Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 18, 2024, 06:15:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  The Gaming Graveyard  |  Star Wars: The Old Republic  |  Topic: The AC-Changing/Dual-Spec/"I'd rather play Rift" Thread 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 Go Down Print
Author Topic: The AC-Changing/Dual-Spec/"I'd rather play Rift" Thread  (Read 46491 times)
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #140 on: December 02, 2011, 09:41:02 AM

Because design by forum whining is a great idea.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #141 on: December 02, 2011, 09:58:44 AM

Because design by forum whining is a great idea.

That kind of logic is why devs never learn. Not all forum whining is bad.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Pezzle
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1618


Reply #142 on: December 02, 2011, 10:03:07 AM

True, but that does not make hundreds of posts a good whine.
Amaron
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2020


Reply #143 on: December 02, 2011, 10:06:06 AM

AC switching would not take much to implement, frankly. Especially if they're putting in dual speccing.

You'd be surprised.   There are always problems for something they never anticipated when writing the software.   Respecing is already in so the backend supports dual spec for the most part.

Either way there's still no rush.   People who want to play both AC's can just roll other characters while they wait.   There's plenty of content here.
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #144 on: December 02, 2011, 10:25:19 AM

True, but that does not make hundreds of posts a good whine.
Right, the loudest != the best.
Bunk
Contributor
Posts: 5828

Operating Thetan One


Reply #145 on: December 02, 2011, 10:26:39 AM

While Bioware games don't change massively in plot based on what dialog choices you make, there is still a difference. A playthrough of the same story as Male, Goody twoshoes, Soldier Shep is a drastically different experience from a Female, Snarky, Engineer Shep. I can play it through with different companions and make totaly different choices throughout the story. Yes, I'll end up in the same place at the end, but it is a different experience.
This is an MMO that has been slightly touched by Bioware story philosophy.  The experience is not significantly different.
To be fair, being a drastically different story hasn't really impacted my motivation to replay the same experience in past games. In WoW, I actually tended to replay the same starting areas that I liked as alts, despite knowing it would be all the same quests - the key was though, I was getting the experience of a different class. I played three different class Blood Elfs for example.

I haven't played Beta, so I don't know how much overlap there is between say a SW's early game experience vs. an IA, but I'm assuming its similar to WoW in that they don't even start on the same planet. If I like the experience of the SW's starting world, I'm actually likely to play another SW again. The fact that I'll have an alternate AC to select improves that experience for me, and increases my replay value.

Don't get me wrong here, whether or not these options actually go in means far less to me than say the item modifying being talked about in another thread. If it's a feature I don't wan't, I'll ignore it. I just get a little annoyed at some of the "OMG THe Sky is Falling! How can we have an MMO in this day and age without this!!!1!! " type reactions to features that didn't exist when I played WoW.I'm all for improvements to the genre that are clear improvements, but not everyone agrees that instant spec switching is one of those.

"Welcome to the internet, pussy." - VDL
"I have retard strength." - Schild
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #146 on: December 02, 2011, 10:59:09 AM

True, but that does not make hundreds of posts a good whine.
Right, the loudest != the best.

That's an incorrect statement; it might or might not be the best. You can't dismiss an idea just because a bunch of mouthbreathers are yelling that they want it; there's as good a chance that it would be a good change as there is that it would be a bad one.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Draegan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10043


Reply #147 on: December 02, 2011, 11:06:37 AM

I think we've got another WAR on our hands, here.  Which shouldn't be surprising given the pedigree and EA's tentacled presence but it's still disappointing.  Ah well, I'll still enjoy it for a few stories-worth of playtime at least.

How much you wanna bet on this?   why so serious?
Rasix
Moderator
Posts: 15024

I am the harbinger of your doom!


Reply #148 on: December 02, 2011, 11:11:08 AM

I think we've got another WAR on our hands, here.  

Ohh, I don't know.  I think at least I'll get past level 14 here.  I'm not sure how you all nearly made it to cap in that game.

-Rasix
Draegan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10043


Reply #149 on: December 02, 2011, 11:13:00 AM

I think I made it to level 28 or 29 before I finally quit.
Sobelius
Terracotta Army
Posts: 761


Reply #150 on: December 02, 2011, 11:25:47 AM

...I haven't played Beta, so I don't know how much overlap there is between say a SW's early game experience vs. an IA, but I'm assuming its similar to WoW in that they don't even start on the same planet....

Classes = Starting worlds:

IA/BH = Hutta
SW/SI = Khorraban
JK/JC = Tython
TR/SM = Ord Mantell

That said, the storylines of the two classes on a given starting planet only overlap as far as the current state of that area (e.g. local factional warfare/turf wars) and some side quests.

The IA/BH and TR/SM differences felt more distinct from each other to me than the SW/SI or JK/JC did.

"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire
"A world without Vin Diesel is sad." -- me
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #151 on: December 02, 2011, 11:41:02 AM

That's an incorrect statement; it might or might not be the best.
Point conceded. In my defense, I'm not a math geek and used a sloppy operand.

About starting worlds: I played the JC and JK, there's overlap but it still felt like a distinct experience in the same setting. As the Knight I kept going over to places that had figured centrally in the Consular plot and wondering why I couldn't interact with them.
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #152 on: December 02, 2011, 11:49:19 AM

- Because if it is there, and its easy, I'm going to be expected to do it. I'm going to be expected to have multiple gear sets, two carefully planned out ACs, and to have practiced playing both effectively. If I refuse, I'll likely be considered gimpy and not worth inviting to group.

That's probably my biggest objection to on-the-fly swapping right there. If I play as a Sith Juggernaut, I don't want some group expecting me to change to a Marauder for the next boss or whatever.

I have no real objections to MA's suggestion that the ACs just be separate classes, but I can also see why they might want some level of homogeneity at lower levels.

This is the biggest load of bullshit I've seen yet in this thread.  I have never once in all the years of playing WoW ever been barred or kicked from a group because of a lack of a second spec.  Ever.

Edit: Let's just say for the sake of argument that this ends up being a problem.  It won't, but let's just pretend it would be.  You'd still have that problem without AC switching anyway!  "Hey DPS Shadow, switch to tank now or we'll kick you!"  Yes, I see that happening all the time.  swamp poop
« Last Edit: December 02, 2011, 11:58:41 AM by Nevermore »

Over and out.
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #153 on: December 02, 2011, 11:53:28 AM

It helps having a dungeon finder type thing available of course. Which is my next big crusade.  why so serious?

Also, let me put my half-assed casual raid leader hat on for a minute: multi-role spec switching makes it easier for *everyone* in my guild to get into a raid, even the people who choose not to do it. The reason being that most people *will* choose to do it, and the fact that they have a tank or heal spec hanging around makes it more likely that the raid will happen *at all*. So even for hardcore I ONLY DO ONE ROLE EVER purists, having this available is a plus IMO.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
kildorn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5014


Reply #154 on: December 02, 2011, 11:58:57 AM

Heck, we've had rare nights when we simply had too many healers or tanks or whatnot and people needed to fake DPS.

The reason you never see this happen in pugs is because I'm presuming you're in the spec that you have the best gear/playstyle for. Sure you could switch to a healer possibly, in your green con level 50 healing gear. Woo.

Spec switching doesn't cause you to be required to lug around multiple sets of gear. It just gives you options when life gives you 3 tanks, 4 healers and 1 dps logged in on the guild.
Bunk
Contributor
Posts: 5828

Operating Thetan One


Reply #155 on: December 02, 2011, 12:05:06 PM

- Because if it is there, and its easy, I'm going to be expected to do it. I'm going to be expected to have multiple gear sets, two carefully planned out ACs, and to have practiced playing both effectively. If I refuse, I'll likely be considered gimpy and not worth inviting to group.

That's probably my biggest objection to on-the-fly swapping right there. If I play as a Sith Juggernaut, I don't want some group expecting me to change to a Marauder for the next boss or whatever.

I have no real objections to MA's suggestion that the ACs just be separate classes, but I can also see why they might want some level of homogeneity at lower levels.

This is the biggest load of bullshit I've seen yet in this thread.  I have never once in all the years of playing WoW ever been barred or kicked from a group because of a lack of a second spec.  Ever.

Edit: Let's just say for the sake of argument that this ends up being a problem.  It won't, but let's just pretend it would be.  You'd still have that problem without AC switching anyway!  "Hey DPS Shadow, switch to tank now or we'll kick you!"  Yes, I see that happening all the time.  swamp poop

Hey, fair enough. I stopped my WoW run before switching came in, so have no idea whether it was an issue. Just seemed like the kind of stupid thing that would occur.

You can't deny though that if I'm playing my SW as just a Juggernaught, and everyone having two ACs per character, it would double my chances of losing Tank loot to someone's "need" for their second spec.
Coming in to this thread, my only solid argument against switching ACs was that my gut told me it wasn't something I wanted. Now I'm just brainstorming more valid reasons to back up that feeling.

"Welcome to the internet, pussy." - VDL
"I have retard strength." - Schild
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #156 on: December 02, 2011, 12:07:40 PM

From what I saw at the low levels I played, the loot that dropped in at least the Esseles flashpoint was all named stuff like "Commando's Heavy Boots" or whatever; if they did that all the way through everything it would be pretty easy to restrict need rolls (or give a bonus to need rolls like the LFR thing does in WoW) based on *current* AC.

It also seemed like they were tailoring blue+ drops to the people there, Sjofn and I didn't see anything drop that wasn't for us. Could have been coincidence though.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2011, 12:09:15 PM by Ingmar »

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Jherad
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1040

I find Rachel Maddow seriously hot.


Reply #157 on: December 02, 2011, 12:08:40 PM

Yeah, I never experienced switching in WoW either, as per my earlier comment.

Again, I *had* been asked on more than one occasion to go back to the trainer to respec for a particular raid, and I remember at the time this was par for the course for certain classes, at least on my server.

If you don't think it'll be a problem, then great.  Ohhhhh, I see.
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12003

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #158 on: December 02, 2011, 12:09:10 PM

IMHO AC switching should not be allowed. My reasons are my own opinion and my own meaning I give to the Adv Classes. But hey, wtf do I know... all I have is my opinion.  why so serious?

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #159 on: December 02, 2011, 12:13:36 PM

You can't deny though that if I'm playing my SW as just a Juggernaught, and everyone having two ACs per character, it would double my chances of losing Tank loot to someone's "need" for their second spec.
Coming in to this thread, my only solid argument against switching ACs was that my gut told me it wasn't something I wanted. Now I'm just brainstorming more valid reasons to back up that feeling.

This is a dual spec problem though, not a AC switching problem.  Dual specs have already been confirmed as going in (or has it? I've lost track.) so this is going to be a problem anyway.  To pull a percentage out of my ass, I'd say maybe 75% to 80% of the time people were generally pretty good about only needing stuff for their main spec in random pugs in WoW.  But yes, there would be times the person healing needed the tank trinket or whatever.

You aren't going to avoid this problem by disallowing AC switching though, since most ACs already have two possible roles to fill.

Over and out.
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #160 on: December 02, 2011, 12:27:21 PM

Yeah, I never experienced switching in WoW either, as per my earlier comment.

Again, I *had* been asked on more than one occasion to go back to the trainer to respec for a particular raid, and I remember at the time this was par for the course for certain classes, at least on my server.

If you don't think it'll be a problem, then great.  Ohhhhh, I see.

I do remember a time when WoW was first released when certain specs were deliberately gimped to the point of near unusability, so to get into a raid you had to have a certain spec or talent a specific ability.  See: trying to raid as a feral Druid when they only wanted Innervate (which at the time was the 31 point Resto talent).  That was more due to bad game design than anything else though, and went away as Blizzard actually started to make an effort to make most specs reasonably viable.

So if this ends up being a problem in SWTOR, you can look to poor talent trees as the problem.  Don't think that you'll somehow magically get into a raid just because you can't switch ACs if that's the case, though.  If it turns out (for the sake of argument) that all Sentinels are crap for raiding regardless of spec, you just won't get into a raid at all if there's no AC switching.  If there is AC switching, you can at least have a Guardian spec to raid with until the devs fix the problems with Sentinels.

Over and out.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #161 on: December 02, 2011, 12:34:05 PM

Or to put it another way, if you're a dps character, you will always feel pressured to switch if you like guaranteed spots in stuff.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Pezzle
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1618


Reply #162 on: December 02, 2011, 12:40:22 PM

It helps having a dungeon finder type thing available of course. Which is my next big crusade.  why so serious?

Also, let me put my half-assed casual raid leader hat on for a minute: multi-role spec switching makes it easier for *everyone* in my guild to get into a raid, even the people who choose not to do it. The reason being that most people *will* choose to do it, and the fact that they have a tank or heal spec hanging around makes it more likely that the raid will happen *at all*. So even for hardcore I ONLY DO ONE ROLE EVER purists, having this available is a plus IMO.

Companions? 

A bunch of healers around with damage and tank companions would be just fine.  Unless you mean the level 50 raid stuff, I cannot say how that works out.
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #163 on: December 02, 2011, 12:41:06 PM

Can't take companions to raids. They go in dungeons fine, but dungeons aren't going to be an issue in composition terms anyway.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Pezzle
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1618


Reply #164 on: December 02, 2011, 12:45:31 PM

Ok, was making sure we are on the same page.  Amid the slapfighting terms and meanings can get fuzzy.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #165 on: December 02, 2011, 12:52:46 PM

Can't take companions to raids. They go in dungeons fine, but dungeons aren't going to be an issue in composition terms anyway.

That's a dumb design decision if there ever was one.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Reg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5271


Reply #166 on: December 02, 2011, 12:55:45 PM

I think we should have the option to send our companions out on raids without our even having to go along!
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #167 on: December 02, 2011, 12:56:09 PM

Nah, it makes sense. Raids have to have a tighter balance than dungeons if they're going to work as 'endgame content' and because a companion is only about 60% as good as a regular player, if they balanced it for a group with maximum companions it would be far too easy for a group that is all real players.

I imagine that companions also don't play well with more complicated boss mechanics. I've already noticed them not running out of fire in the Esseles.

Now, they *could* have made it so the raids are balanced for a group where everyone also has a companion along, but that probably would make raiding healers quit the game.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #168 on: December 02, 2011, 01:00:53 PM

that probably would make raiding healers quit the game.

 Love Letters

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Pezzle
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1618


Reply #169 on: December 02, 2011, 01:14:34 PM

Nah, it makes sense. Raids have to have a tighter balance than dungeons if they're going to work as 'endgame content' and because a companion is only about 60% as good as a regular player, if they balanced it for a group with maximum companions it would be far too easy for a group that is all real players.

I imagine that companions also don't play well with more complicated boss mechanics. I've already noticed them not running out of fire in the Esseles.

Now, they *could* have made it so the raids are balanced for a group where everyone also has a companion along, but that probably would make raiding healers quit the game.

60% as good as which people?  why so serious?
Draegan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10043


Reply #170 on: December 02, 2011, 01:24:53 PM

Nah, it makes sense. Raids have to have a tighter balance than dungeons if they're going to work as 'endgame content' and because a companion is only about 60% as good as a regular player, if they balanced it for a group with maximum companions it would be far too easy for a group that is all real players.

I imagine that companions also don't play well with more complicated boss mechanics. I've already noticed them not running out of fire in the Esseles.

Now, they *could* have made it so the raids are balanced for a group where everyone also has a companion along, but that probably would make raiding healers quit the game.

60% as good as which people?  why so serious?

Racist.
Miasma
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5283

Stopgap Measure


Reply #171 on: December 02, 2011, 01:31:41 PM

I hope they do this.  One of the reasons I used to quit wow so often (before duel spec) was that as a healer I would really suck at anything single player, it was painful.  As far as I can tell this will be worse in swtor since if I want to be a healer I have to make that decision at level 10 and then proceed through the next 40 levels semi sucking compared to the more dps oriented AC.  I have been seriously considering just being another dps guy instead of the healer I normally am.
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #172 on: December 02, 2011, 01:33:01 PM

Actually THAT shouldn't be a problem, since your companion will cover a lot of your problems when you're solo.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #173 on: December 02, 2011, 01:34:50 PM

Every AC has at least one DPS tree as well.

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Pezzle
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1618


Reply #174 on: December 02, 2011, 01:56:50 PM

Yeah, my Sage is mostly ?balance? Fun with force quake and throwing junked out droids plus I can heal!
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  The Gaming Graveyard  |  Star Wars: The Old Republic  |  Topic: The AC-Changing/Dual-Spec/"I'd rather play Rift" Thread  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC