Title: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Ozzu on November 14, 2008, 10:36:39 PM Yeah, I'm starting a "Lost" thread. I started watching it on DVD a couple of weeks ago. I just started season 3. I dig it. However, I can see how this show would be extremely frustrating if you're attempting to actually tune in each week.
You're given very little when it comes to actually answering what the hell is going on and when they do, they give you more questions. However, watching them all back to back to back, it's just like a really long movie and the "no answers" issue isn't really an issue at all. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on November 14, 2008, 11:11:35 PM Yes, this. When I watched the first season it was on DVD so I got to see it all in one go and it was amazing. I still like the show but it is harder to enjoy when you only get one hour a week to advance a plot.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: stray on November 14, 2008, 11:29:50 PM I gave up on it, just like Heroes. Too many damn plot changes.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rasix on November 14, 2008, 11:35:29 PM I think it was either the first part of season 2 or 3 where the show got really bad. I almost gave up on it then, but it righted the ship somewhat. Still, you kind of get the feeling that they're making this shit up as they go along.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on November 14, 2008, 11:39:07 PM I think it was either the first part of season 2 or 3 where the show got really bad. I almost gave up on it then, but it righted the ship somewhat. Still, you kind of get the feeling that they're making this shit up as they go along. I enjoyed the hell out of the first two seasons and the first couple of season three have been pretty good too. I see that season 4 is really short. I guess the writer's strike screwed it up? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on November 15, 2008, 12:10:48 AM I love Lost. One of the better shows ever done. I've never understood the "waaaah, no answers" nonsense. If you are reading a great book, are you wishing that it answers every mystery and ends? No. Things got a tad muddled in the middle of Season 3 because they weren't sure how long the show was going to be on. Once they got the full order for the entire run and knew how many episodes they needed to spread the entire arc over, the show really picked up and Season 3 ended with one of the more amazing episodes (Through the Looking Glass). Season 4, despite being jerked around by the writers strike, was damn god (with "The Constant," despite being an admitted homage to STNG's "All Good Things..." being one of the best eps of TV ever).
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on November 15, 2008, 06:50:48 AM Is this back on? I haven't seen it in ages. I remember the story that they were going to sort out the loose ends, have less episodes and would have an ending for it in 2010 or something but that was the last thing I heard.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on November 15, 2008, 08:54:39 AM Starts back up in 2009, not sure when.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on November 15, 2008, 10:06:57 AM January 21st, with a clip show at 8 EST, followed by back-to-back new shows at 9 and 10. The rest of the season will run on Wednesdays at 9 EST.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on November 15, 2008, 05:02:09 PM Watching back-to-back on DVD is definitely the best way to enjoy this show- without a doubt.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on November 15, 2008, 05:34:02 PM I think it was either the first part of season 2 or 3 where the show got really bad. I almost gave up on it then, but it righted the ship somewhat. Still, you kind of get the feeling that they're making this shit up as they go along. Erm, I"m the opposite. Now granted I first saw Lost season 3 first, then 1 and 2 (roommates bought season 3 and I watched them) but I think that Season 3 and most of season 4 are a hell of a lot better than seasons 1 and the first half of 2. I just did not find the whole "everyone needs to work together and be friends so we survive" arc to be that interesting. I enjoyed the mystery of the island much more than the personalities of the main survivors. I think the first season would have been more interesting from the perspective of the tail survivors, as it seemed like their troubles were more of surviving the harsh environment and circumstances rather than just trying to survive the retarded drama. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on November 15, 2008, 10:00:29 PM I enjoyed the mystery of the island much more than the personalities of the main survivors. For me, that's the case with some of the characters. However, for a character like Locke, I really enjoy his backstory. His life was very interesting/depressing. There are a couple of other characters who I enjoy seeing some flashbacks with. Others, I can take or leave and there are also those that I just take a deep breath because I know what's coming and I'm going to be agitated everytime they flash back on them. Jack is one of those. His daddy issues are kinda old. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on November 16, 2008, 08:55:03 AM See, I still like Jack, though the writers seem to keep taking great pains to show how flawed a character he is. By now, we've gotten that they are all flawed characters. I think the flashbacks are going to really have to be rethought for the next season, because there shouldn't be much more interesting things to mine in those veins. Kate and Jack can't have much more soul-crushing drama to obsess over.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on November 16, 2008, 10:45:42 AM I'm still waiting for them to start actually showcasing Jack's supposed leadership ability, instead of his angst and anger issues. I still like his character, but seriously, he needs to grow up a little. I think it was HaemishM who mentioned at one point, "The dude can't seem to get over shit. At all."
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on November 16, 2008, 10:49:09 AM Meh
I wish Jack's character was cut after the pilot like he was supposed to be. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on November 17, 2008, 11:04:15 AM Watching back-to-back on DVD is definitely the best way to enjoy this show- without a doubt. Agreed, but once you know there's a new episode out and you could be watching it RIGHT NOW rather than having to try to avoid spoilers for the next year while you wait for it to come out on DVD... well, they have you by the balls. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on November 28, 2008, 02:40:48 AM Just finished season 4 and am caught up. Instead of waiting for season 4 to come out on DVD, I watched the episodes on http://www.abc.com which was actually kinda cool. Good quality, very little commercial interruption, and no waiting. :grin:
Season 4 = win. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tannhauser on November 28, 2008, 03:40:51 AM For you WoW players, there is a big time Lost reference in Sholazar Basin.
Hint: It's on an island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on December 20, 2008, 11:40:45 PM I'm in the middle of season 2 now for the first time. Amazing show.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on December 21, 2008, 12:40:05 AM I'm in the middle of season 2 now for the first time. Amazing show. It really is. The best segment of episodes, to me, was the season finale of 3 through season 4. So, it gets better. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on December 29, 2008, 01:25:51 PM I just finished the series over the weekend. Wow. I'm glad I watched it all at once rather than over time. That shit would of pissed me off having to wait each week and deal with commercials.
Great series. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 04, 2009, 02:01:49 AM I just finished the series over the weekend. Wow. I'm glad I watched it all at once rather than over time. That shit would of pissed me off having to wait each week and deal with commercials. Great series. Indeed. I'm really looking forward to the beginning of season 5. It's too bad I'll have to do the weekly wait thing. I guess I could wait until the series has completely run its course and come out on DVD, but I sure as hell don't have the willpower for that. :heartbreak: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on January 04, 2009, 11:43:07 PM It's coming down the pipeline soon for the new stuff. I personally never watch it live, but always pick it up on the abc site when they do the video feed. As for predictions, I think this season will move the show into a even more fantasy direction. The island is gone, and there's very few places to go beyond magic. Perhaps some wacky version of sci-fi bullshit, but oh well. It's a morality play with no real direction.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on January 09, 2009, 02:31:17 PM This upcoming season is supposed to be the 2nd to last right?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on January 09, 2009, 02:32:32 PM Yeah, I thought it was they try to get back on the Island and then the last season they all try to get off.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 14, 2009, 06:47:53 AM Tonight, ABC is showing an "enhanced" season 4 finale. It's like a pop-up video thing that gives little explanations and points out things you might have missed the first time watching it. I guess they're getting geared up for next week. :grin:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on January 17, 2009, 01:02:12 AM I've really enjoyed the show. It's a bit rough in spots, particularly the first chunk of season three which really seemed to flounder a bit, but it's just chock full of great characters and a lot of fun bits. Looking forward to more Lost soon. I should rewatch the last 4-5 episodes of last season before this next one starts up.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on January 17, 2009, 07:29:52 AM It looks like it's on the primetime broadcast On Demand, too, which helps a bit. I would use the DVR bit that says to record the series and not just the episodes but it seems to record every episode including the repeated ones even when I tell it not to. I'm tired of screaming at the tv set. On Demand is a good thing. Especially for Righ who watches very little tv but doesn't have to use his concerned look so much when I get frustrated with all the little buttons which allegedly make everything work.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on January 21, 2009, 11:50:51 PM I'm so confused now. :uhrr:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 22, 2009, 06:30:24 AM I'm so confused now. :uhrr: :awesome_for_real: It was a great couple of episodes. I'm pretty sure I have a decent grasp on what's going on at the moment. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on January 22, 2009, 07:32:25 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on January 22, 2009, 08:32:18 AM I thought they explained the island didn't really move but is just out of phase with time now. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on January 22, 2009, 08:42:18 AM Yes.
I loved this episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nonentity on January 22, 2009, 09:39:30 AM Well...
Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on January 22, 2009, 09:54:13 AM I have to say at this point I kinda wish one of the survivors would get a clue and a gun and kill both linus and penny's dad. Seriously has anything good come to anybody following what either of those guys has said? If you cannot figure out which your enemy is kill both its safer.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on January 22, 2009, 10:03:05 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on January 22, 2009, 10:13:28 AM Why are we using spoilers?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on January 22, 2009, 10:29:05 AM Guys with guns in the end are not Dharma folks in my opinion.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on January 22, 2009, 11:01:58 AM Here's what I'm hoping *isn't* going to happen.
By being "Lost in Time" (haha, that's clever) the survivors and their actions create the whole "society" of Others/Dharma and for all the mysterious leftovers on the island (the old dead couple from Season 1 for example). Because that would make me want to choke a bitch. Who was with the lady at the end? Wasn't she the weird old lady from Desmond's time-travelling episodes where she tells him he can't fuck with time? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on January 22, 2009, 11:58:09 AM Yes, that's her.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on January 22, 2009, 12:09:05 PM prediction: she's Daniel's Mom
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nonentity on January 22, 2009, 01:44:38 PM Yogurt got hit with a flaming arrow!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on January 22, 2009, 08:16:10 PM Here's what I'm hoping *isn't* going to happen. By being "Lost in Time" (haha, that's clever) the survivors and their actions create the whole "society" of Others/Dharma and for all the mysterious leftovers on the island (the old dead couple from Season 1 for example). Because that would make me want to choke a bitch. I'm pretty sure that's exactly where they're going with it. I took it as a forgone conclusion that Bernard and Rose will be the dead couple in the cave once the time jumping started happening. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on January 22, 2009, 10:14:02 PM Oooo good one. Hadn't thought of that.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on January 22, 2009, 10:39:00 PM Yep it's all going to be about time travel, sadly. It still doesn't explain a freaky ass smoke monster.
Remember when "what's that roar" was the biggest question on this show? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on January 23, 2009, 03:19:32 AM No. But I do remember when it was 'when's Kate going to get her tits out.'
Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on January 23, 2009, 09:32:31 AM I did not watch much of a couple seasons did they every really explain what the hell the deal with the polar bears was?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on January 23, 2009, 09:40:28 AM Zoological experiments being done on the island. They bought some bears over.
Every non-watcher I talk to always asks about the polar bears. I can't understand why that's such a sticking point with so many people, neither the mystery nor the answer really seemed important to me. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 23, 2009, 01:44:13 PM Yep it's all going to be about time travel, sadly. It still doesn't explain a freaky ass smoke monster. Remember when "what's that roar" was the biggest question on this show? The creators have said they're going to explain the smoke monster. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 23, 2009, 11:04:50 PM The polar bears were there to turn the donkey wheel that Ben turned to move the island as evidenced by the skeleton w/ the Dharma collar found in Tunisia (where Ben popped out after he turned the wheel in the ICY cave).
I love this freaking show. These guys have managed to get 7 seasons of the most geeky sci-fi on network television without large swaths of the viewing public realizing it. Quote Yogurt got hit with a flaming arrow! Oh, and that would be Frogurt, not this guy: (http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y222/Abagadro/yogurt.jpg) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on January 24, 2009, 09:34:52 AM Oh, and that would be Frogurt, not this guy: Yeah, the thing that got me, even though I have seen the actor before, I dont recall him on this show...he just..appeared somewhere in the jumping. Then got shot. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 24, 2009, 10:18:40 AM Frogurt has been around. He tried to help Bernard build the SOS sign and (in one of the webisodes) had a tussle with Hurley over Libby. He was in the Zodiac with Faraday when the island jumped. Definitely a minor character.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on January 24, 2009, 10:26:54 AM So can we call the red-shirts on LOST "Frogurts" now?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 24, 2009, 10:37:36 AM He's a little higher in profile than a Sock, which is what the producers call the actors whose sole purpose is to be background and die. They've killed most of those off by now anyways.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: UnSub on January 26, 2009, 05:22:29 PM Yep it's all going to be about time travel, sadly. It still doesn't explain a freaky ass smoke monster. Remember when "what's that roar" was the biggest question on this show? The creators have said they're going to explain the smoke monster. The creators say a lot of things. I really liked the first series of "Lost". But somewhere in the heaping mystery upon mystery, everything of note happening in the last five minute of each show, every series introducing a new group of people (so we could go through their stories too) and major characters acting like retards just to keep the plot moving (see: Why Isn't Linus Dead?), I gave up. I'm waiting for the end so someone can distil everything into one pithy line that explains things (e.g. "It was Laura Palmer's dad"). Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on January 26, 2009, 07:23:42 PM Didn't the creators also say the island had nothing to do with time travel?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: pxib on January 26, 2009, 07:30:57 PM I watched two episodes of Lost and realized that there was no big plan. Television exists to sell advertising, so the point is to keep folks tuning in all the way through a commercial break and, ideally, all the way through the week until the next episode. A continuing plot provides this sort of continuity by promising that questions asked in one episode will be answered in another. It's why soap operas have such cultic followings. The "genius" of Lost is in removing the plot in order to streamline the posing and answering of questions. Characters do not grow and develop because that might actually make things resolve... which would stop the money.
Lost made me feel used rather than entertained. I get my amusement listening in on discussions at work... and they summarize entire story arcs in less than a minute. Plus there are no commercials. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on January 27, 2009, 04:29:59 AM Didn't the creators also say the island had nothing to do with time travel? I don't remember that, but I do remember them saying "No, they're not dead and it's not Purgatory," which was a prevalent theory the first year and a half. I watched two episodes of Lost and realized that there was no big plan. Television exists to sell advertising, so the point is to keep folks tuning in all the way through a commercial break and, ideally, all the way through the week until the next episode. A continuing plot provides this sort of continuity by promising that questions asked in one episode will be answered in another. It's why soap operas have such cultic followings. The "genius" of Lost is in removing the plot in order to streamline the posing and answering of questions. Characters do not grow and develop because that might actually make things resolve... which would stop the money. Lost made me feel used rather than entertained. I get my amusement listening in on discussions at work... and they summarize entire story arcs in less than a minute. Plus there are no commercials. This was certainly the case in season 3 and I nearly stopped watching myself. When ratings were plummeting and the show looked like it was going to be canceled the creators wrangled out a 2 year contract in which to wrap things up. Since that point the show's gotten better, questions have been resolved and things have gotten considerably better because there WILL be an ending point. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on January 27, 2009, 03:34:32 PM I only got into Lost when I could watch every episode immediately. I can see the rage that would happen having to wait a week for the next.
Didn't the series get renewed for an other 2 years? Although I think it's great, I was kind of disappointed to hear that... Should leave on a high note. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tannhauser on January 27, 2009, 04:33:48 PM I watched my first episode since 1st season the other night and I was entertained. They had a show that caught folks like me up in the plot beforehand, a good move. The show format was much better (i.e. linear narrative more or less) instead of the old 5min setup, 40min flashback, 5min shocking ending.
So kudos to them for turning the show around, but I am not sure I am going to get back on the bandwagon. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Sunbury on January 28, 2009, 11:52:48 AM I'm confused about something. If the whole island and everyone on it is NOT jumping in time and space, but only the 815 survivors... Why did the island appear to disappear from the helo's view? Wouldn't have just the 815's on the the island vanished? If the island did move in space, but the Others did not move in time/space, are they now treading water? Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on January 28, 2009, 12:01:06 PM That's what I was bitching about. It doesn't make sense. Richard isn't threading water so I guess the rest of the Others aren't either. I guess they have protection as natives. Of course that doesn't explain Juliet who has been stuck on the island 3+ years.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on January 28, 2009, 12:49:12 PM I'm confused about something. If the whole island and everyone on it is NOT jumping in time and space, but only the 815 survivors... Why did the island appear to disappear from the helo's view? Wouldn't have just the 815's on the the island vanished? If the island did move in space, but the Others did not move in time/space, are they now treading water? They said they were outside of the bubble. They were to far, and outside "the shield" to be taken with the island and the others. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 28, 2009, 01:05:47 PM I believe it was explaned as that the island did move but that the people are "skipping" along the time continuum. So the island is like the record and the people are the needle.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on January 28, 2009, 09:23:53 PM I thought the first two episodes were great, and this one was even better. Removing the flash forwards and flash backs was a good move. Charlotte, Miles and Faraday are turning out to be interesting characters, which I didn't think they would.
http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f118/TheBossLambada/ladyericstoltz.jpg The file name is :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 28, 2009, 09:48:05 PM Tonight's episode was greatness. It explained a couple of things I was curious about in the whole Locke/Alpert relationship.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on January 28, 2009, 10:14:16 PM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 28, 2009, 10:21:53 PM Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on January 29, 2009, 08:07:21 AM Ya pretty good episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on January 29, 2009, 11:08:11 AM Fucking-a awesome episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on January 29, 2009, 01:57:40 PM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on January 29, 2009, 04:58:10 PM Awesome Episodes so far. God I love this show.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on January 29, 2009, 06:22:06 PM ...leads me to believe that he will get banished from the island at some point and he spends all these years attempting to get back. That explains his motivation in a way. We'll see I guess. With his kind of weird rivalry/standoff with Ben, and the lines of dialogue he had ("You think he knows the Island better than me?") it feels like they're setting it up for him to have a kind of deluded sense of entitlement that he's being groomed or chosen to be the new leader, then that gets yanked away from him and he's all pissy to get back and take back what is rightfully his from those know-nothing idiots. Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on February 04, 2009, 06:44:32 PM Oh FuckShit Jin!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 04, 2009, 06:50:51 PM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 04, 2009, 07:06:52 PM Kate cleans up nice.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Xerapis on February 04, 2009, 09:44:00 PM Thank you Lord!
I TAKE THAT BACK! Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 04, 2009, 10:00:49 PM Haha, was just about to post that myself.
Decent episode, not to much plot or secret exposure, just mainly set up. Though the end was great (I knew Jin was still alive!!). My theory is that the boat they took belonged to Ben/Jack/Sayed and group from when they finally get back on the island. Jack probably is the one who gets shot :why_so_serious:. And yes, fuck it, no more spoiler tags. This is a god damn lost discussion thread. If anybody was afraid of spoilers, they wouldn't be in here. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 05, 2009, 12:07:29 AM Good episode. Season 5 has been pretty fast paced thus far. My biggest question is who the hell was shooting at them while they were in the boat? I guess it could be "the Others", but I figure we'll probably never know for sure since it doesn't seem as though they have repeat visits to the same time.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on February 05, 2009, 07:04:12 AM Here's my guess- it was themselves shooting at them because they're about to go shit the space/time bed.
Also: The lawyer for Oceanic works for Ben? Perhaps Ben/Others are members or owners of the Oceanic plane? Perhaps, they bought it only after the crash? I imagine that those with the power of The Island can use it to build quite a stash for themselves as they flit backwards and forwards through time. I'm going to guess that Charles Widmore used it to amass quite a bit of personal wealth and was kicked off The Island for his greed. Perhaps "what's done is done" only applies to some things and not others. Anyways, now that Widmore has a good chunk of the Philosopher's Legacy or whatever you want to call his time travel fortune, he's trying to use it to get back to The Island and reassume control. Control that maybe is "rightfully" his. Since he's already sitting on a boatload of cash, I'll guess that he doesn't just want it to make more of it. There has to be something greater at stake that Island control will give him. Immortality, by way of constantly going to the past? Some greater function that we haven't really been clued in on yet? Maybe it is simply to be able to go back and steer the course of humanity. Are The Others interested in the same thing, or just in keeping Widmore's hands off of it? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 05, 2009, 10:05:59 PM Quote The lawyer for Oceanic works for Ben That wasn't Oceanic's lawyer, that was Claire's mom's lawyer who was suing Oceanic and also Ben's lawyer. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 07, 2009, 05:16:17 AM Ben remains my absolute favorite character on the show. I feel certain that, in the end, I'm not going to get a satisfying explanation as to exactly why he does what he does, but goddamn I enjoy the hell out of his neverending scheming bastardry. Every now and again he skates the edge of being a sympathetic character, which just adds to the fun.
"I always have a plan, John." Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on February 09, 2009, 01:27:50 PM I just cannot understand why somebody has not capped ben yet. There comes a point when all the characters have to realize that nothing good has ever come from listening to a word he says no matter how good it may have looked in the short term it always turns to poop.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 09, 2009, 05:17:55 PM I just cannot understand why somebody has not capped ben yet. There comes a point when all the characters have to realize that nothing good has ever come from listening to a word he says no matter how good it may have looked in the short term it always turns to poop. They seem to have a common goal with him now though. Some of them might not know it yet, but they do. So, it's in their best interest to listen to what he has to say until they actually get back to the island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: AngryGumball on February 09, 2009, 11:54:19 PM I somehow believed that Ben was being redeemed for the good of the island with his removal from it and being the wetwork man along with Saeed. Then to help get the others back onto the island to continue his redemption
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 12, 2009, 07:09:26 AM Another excellent episode last night. I knew something had to be up with Charlotte and her growing up on the island makes some sense. The fact that she remembers Farraday warning her not to come back is interesting as well.
As I've said before, Locke's story and his character are by far my favorite. Well, the next episode is entitled "The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham". I can't wait to see exactly what happens when he exits the island. Not only is his leg broken, but if I had to guess, I would think he'd be back in a wheelchair. Another curious thing about what we see of him turning the wheel is that the wheel was off its axis a little. I wonder if that's why the island was jumping? Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 12, 2009, 09:08:35 AM Lots of good in this episode. We finally got an explanation for what the black smoke is - it just isn't the explanation we wanted. "A security system for that temple" really just makes me even more interested in the damn thing. I keep wondering if they are going to jump in time back to the pirate ship landing. That would be awesome, but probably won't happen.
Looks like Ben is really going to try going back with or without the full compliment. The season just keeps getting better. Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on February 13, 2009, 11:29:28 AM I'm pretty sure we've been told the security system bit a few seasons ago, what was new to me was that the temple and smokey had a hand in making Danielle and company go crazy.
Does that peek at the wall with the hieroglyphics also mark our first view of the temple? Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 13, 2009, 12:07:31 PM I don't remember ever seeing the temple before, and based on Jin's reactions, I don't think he'd seen it either.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 13, 2009, 12:19:32 PM It's been referred to a "security system" since the first season when Rousseau called it that. I believe it was again called that in third season when both Mikhail Bakunin and Juliet called it that when they were dealing with the sonic barrier. This is the first time it has been referred to as a security system for "the temple" that I can recall.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 15, 2009, 04:17:54 PM Jin being alive rules. Also, the blond chick with the gun in Richard's camp was a little naughty hottie. If these people would stop shooting at each other long enough, they could open a modelling agency on that island.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 16, 2009, 09:05:21 AM Also, the blond chick with the gun in Richard's camp was a little naughty hottie. A little too :pedobear: for my tastes. Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on February 17, 2009, 08:04:47 AM Yeah, she was past her prime but that's alright enough for me.
Any possibility of her being Mrs. Hawking or any other character known to us? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 17, 2009, 11:27:39 AM Yeah, she was past her prime but that's alright enough for me. Any possibility of her being Mrs. Hawking or any other character known to us? In my mind, it's a guarantee that miss blonde hottie is Faraday's mother. In that flashback they called her "Ellie". Faraday's mother is Eloise Hawking. Which brings up so much more comedy that she was holding a gun to her own future son's head. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 17, 2009, 11:12:08 PM I was fucking floored that they actually, FINALLY went back and tried to give an explanation of the "sickness" that Rousseau talked about. I thought it was an idea they had in the 1st/2nd season that just never came to be and they abandoned. Pretty cool explanation for what she was talking about, actually, and now I want to know WTF is in that temple. Also, Why does Jakes father appear to be Jacob? Yesh.
The season has been great so far. Ever since they hammered down a set time for when the series needs to be completed by (and shorted the number of episodes in the season) the quality has flown up exponetially. God I wish we could get more single season or 'mini-series' in the US. At least HBO seems to be making good ones. Is it sad that I'm somewhat depressed that I'll miss tomorrows episode, because I'll be out drinking/clubbing in SF with a very hot red heading bi-sexual French Chick? Don't answer that. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on February 17, 2009, 11:14:06 PM I'm liking where Lost is taking us.
One thing that strikes me is that they either have rather neat writers, or they knew roughly where they were going for a while. Title: Re: Lost Post by: schild on February 17, 2009, 11:18:11 PM Quote One thing that strikes me is that they either have rather neat writers, or they knew roughly where they were going for a while. They knew where they were going for exactly 3 episodes. After that it was darts thrown at a Jump to Conclusions mat. They probably just watched all the old episodes and are closing things up because they ran out of squares. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on February 17, 2009, 11:22:22 PM I'm still impressed with it. I would get into an argument with you, but I think I'd have to be Reg.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Reg on February 18, 2009, 12:06:08 AM I've really traumatized you over in the Star Trek thread haven't I? Good. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on February 18, 2009, 12:23:57 AM Not so much. You're just a reference point. Like, if I was going to cut Schild's post into stupid chunks, it'd be Sirbrucing. Or if I was going to make what appears to be a really sweet comment that's actually a total removal of your manhood that you wouldn't understand for weeks, it'd be Signeing. Or making it all about Republican awesomeness, as a Triforcing.
:awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Reg on February 18, 2009, 01:22:08 AM Ah cool. We all have our little internet routines and as they go mine isn't so bad. I can live with it anyway.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 18, 2009, 07:39:56 AM Not so much. You're just a reference point. Like, if I was going to cut Schild's post into stupid chunks, it'd be Sirbrucing. Or if I was going to make what appears to be a really sweet comment that's actually a total removal of your manhood that you wouldn't understand for weeks, it'd be Signeing. Or making it all about Republican awesomeness, as a Triforcing. :awesome_for_real: So would calling everyone cunts in one-line be termed an Ironwoody? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 18, 2009, 10:31:30 AM While calling a specific person a cunt for several lines would be a Haemishmash?
Edit: wrong name Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 18, 2009, 06:36:06 PM You just know that letter says something like, "If you're reading this, Ben killed me. Don't listen to that motherfucker!'
Edit: guess not :/ Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on February 18, 2009, 08:30:34 PM The entire time, I was like "so what about all the other assholes in coach?" and then Ben gave his line and I :awesome_for_real:'d
You know, they've had the definite end of the series known for what? A year and a half now? I like to think they've got the barebones of a plot fleshed out already. And if not? I realize that I don't give a shit. The ride is well worth it, even if it doesn't end in some life-changing loopdaloop. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 18, 2009, 10:30:52 PM They always had a full arc of where they were going, they just didn't know how much filler they would have to put into it (which makes it difficult). Once they had a defined number of episodes they could really focus down and get where they wanted to go.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 18, 2009, 11:54:08 PM We want to do a story about people crashing on an island that has time travel technology.
Now stretch it out for 6 years. Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on February 19, 2009, 08:51:53 AM "We aren't going to Guam are we?"
It was kinda corny, but I lol'd. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on February 19, 2009, 08:52:42 AM At least Hurley bought all the seats he could so that some people would be spared. Not every one of them is an asshole. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 19, 2009, 08:58:51 AM This show just keeps bring the win. We're back to the first season's form of awesome - you know the feeling you get when you know this week's episode is over and goddamnit you have to wait a whole week to see what's next. I love that they threw all the characters onto the plane without explaining why everyone is going - that just leaves me with more questions and a desire to see more of the show.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 19, 2009, 09:03:11 AM Ya, but the plane didn't crash anyway. They "skipped" just like the people left on the island.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on February 19, 2009, 09:14:00 AM It was like an earlier episode in that it raised far more questions than it answered.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 19, 2009, 09:20:38 AM They even went back to the old school close-up of the eye opening to start the ep. which was a nice touch. Lindeman and Cruse wrote it and next week's so this is pure Lost goodness.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: UnSub on February 20, 2009, 08:35:10 AM Not so much. You're just a reference point. Like, if I was going to cut Schild's post into stupid chunks, it'd be Sirbrucing. Or if I was going to make what appears to be a really sweet comment that's actually a total removal of your manhood that you wouldn't understand for weeks, it'd be Signeing. Or making it all about Republican awesomeness, as a Triforcing. :awesome_for_real: So would calling everyone cunts in one-line be termed an Ironwoody? I don't think I want Ironwood to give me an Ironwoody. I'd be left... confused. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 26, 2009, 08:50:23 AM Fucking awesome episode. They are really keeping up the pace. I think the switch to focusing on smaller amounts of the cast each episode has helped a lot, not to mention the time flips that have given them the ability to fill in pieces of already elapsed time. I knew that Ben would end up killing Locke, and making Widmore the sympathetic benefactor for an episode really helps show both sides of the war. I don't think either side gives one shit about Locke except for the fact that he can get them back to the island.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 26, 2009, 09:05:00 AM Season 5 continues to be great, but not quite as good as season 4. I think we are in for quite a number of flash backs as we still don't know why Kate,Hurley, and Sayid were on the plane. Or why Ben couldn't take Locke's body to the airport. Lots of interesting twists. I like were this is going. But still disgruntled that they have gone with Mysticism than SciFi.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 26, 2009, 09:30:50 AM But still disgruntled that they have going more with Mysticism than SciFi. Pika? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on February 26, 2009, 04:01:49 PM Or why Ben couldn't take Locke's body to the airport. Because he was busy trying to kill Penny (since he saw Desmond at the church), just like he promised Widmore he would. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 26, 2009, 06:46:33 PM Because he was busy trying to kill Penny (since he saw Desmond at the church), just like he promised Widmore he would. That's exactly what I'm thinking as well. I guess we'll find out soon if he was successful. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 26, 2009, 07:57:17 PM Because he was busy trying to kill Penny (since he saw Desmond at the church), just like he promised Widmore he would. That's exactly what I'm thinking as well. I guess we'll find out soon if he was successful. And yes, every episode has been great so far. Why did Ben kill Locke though? I mean, he stopped him from killing himself, then kills him. Was it just so that he could keep him alive long enough to tell him Eloise Hawkings name? Which seems kind of odd because Ben seemed like he already knew the name. But in any event, dear god do they just keep going back and forth on making Ben seem good/evil. Every time I'm convinced he's a complete fucker, they slowly lead me to believe he really has best intentions at heart and is working to help, before making him a complete fucker again. I've never seen any show/book do a character like that this well. I keep falling for it. Though now I pretty much believe they are all fuckers, and the only 'other' type character that seems like he might not be a complete evil asshole is the Richard Alpert guy, who has his own agenda. God I wish they would start to reveal more about him. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 26, 2009, 08:31:38 PM Eloise's name was his leverage to get Locke to take Ben back to the island?
Ben is a megalomaniac. Any good he does is to ingratiate himself with others. Obviously he thinks that the Island is extremely important. So being the Island's chief "protector" is what needs to make himself important. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 26, 2009, 08:33:19 PM But in any event, dear god do they just keep going back and forth on making Ben seem good/evil. Every time I'm convinced he's a complete fucker, they slowly lead me to believe he really has best intentions at heart and is working to help, before making him a complete fucker again. I've never seen any show/book do a character like that this well. I keep falling for it. Ben Linus is entirely my favorite character on the show. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on February 26, 2009, 08:45:04 PM Because he was busy trying to kill Penny (since he saw Desmond at the church), just like he promised Widmore he would. That's exactly what I'm thinking as well. I guess we'll find out soon if he was successful. His success in murdering Penny would give Desmond a pretty strong motivation to come back to the Island for revenge. After she dies in his arms, of course. Wow... I just capitalized "island" without realizing it. Here's a longshot that hit me today, after watching the latest episode a second time. Jacob is really John Locke after all his travels and trials, and the war that everyone is referring to is the original conflict between the Others and Dharma. Everyone needs John there so as to become Jacob. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 26, 2009, 08:45:33 PM Quote But in any event, dear god do they just keep going back and forth on making Ben seem good/evil. I've always assumed Ben was the bad guy. He's a bald faced liar, he's tried to kill Locke twice now, he ain't down with Jacob (I think he's trapped Jacob in that cabin), he doesn't care about the lives of anyone else, etc. But you're right, they do a decent job of obfuscating his true motive. He seems to have known that John would be resurrected, so why kill him to begin with? Was it Mrs. Hawking who told him he'd come back to life, and he just had to role with it to get back on the island? Now that he's becoming a more overt bastard, I'm wondering if they're not setting him up for some redemption arc down the line. I think I'd prefer him being a cold-hearted, manipulative prick out for his own, over someone willing to sacrifice anyone for a hidden, righteous purpose. Anyone notice that Hurley was painting the Sphinx? Maybe we'll get more info on the hieroglyphs soon. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 26, 2009, 09:16:56 PM I am fairly certain that Ben will (or did) kill Penny. And that Desmond will kill Ben in the last episode of the show or thereabouts.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 26, 2009, 10:22:48 PM But you're right, they do a decent job of obfuscating his true motive. He seems to have known that John would be resurrected, so why kill him to begin with? Was it Mrs. Hawking who told him he'd come back to life, and he just had to role with it to get back on the island? Now that he's becoming a more overt bastard, I'm wondering if they're not setting him up for some redemption arc down the line. I think I'd prefer him being a cold-hearted, manipulative prick out for his own, over someone willing to sacrifice anyone for a hidden, righteous purpose. Yeah, I'd actually prefer he just remain the villian. He's an interesting villian to watch though. We've seen the occasional glimpses of some of what makes him tick, but not the whole picture. We've seen that he's not always as in control as he likes to believe he is and seen him snap a couple times (both times he tried to kill John in what I read as a jealous rage, his reaction to Keamy shooting Alex, who I believe he did care about a lot, in his special, psychotic way... etc). I love that he just never stops manipulating everyone around him, and that he really does seem very sincere at times even when you know he's a total bastard. Just a fascinating character to watch. I love the way the actor portrays him. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on February 26, 2009, 10:29:12 PM I don't think there will be a redemption arc for Ben. He has always been written as a Sociopath, likeable if he wants to, but devoid of any real empathy for other people (not entirely sure he isn't just pissed about Alex because she was "His", not because he loved her so dearly. Replace Alex with The Island and you get basically the same reaction).
And I love him that way. That magnificent bastard makes the series fun and the actor does hell of a job with him. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 26, 2009, 10:31:00 PM My favorite thing about Ben is that the character was supposed to be in 2 episodes and Emmerson was so damn good at the delivery of one line "Got any milk?" that the character has evolved into the central pivot-point of the entire series.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 26, 2009, 10:50:43 PM Perhaps Ben had a plan behind killing Locke. Maybe Locke's death couldn't be a suicide (a bit far-fetched, but stick with me). He knows that Locke needs to die to get back on the island, so he does it himself. However, he doesn't do it before finding out exactly what needs to be done next from Locke himself. He then hauls Locke's corpse around knowing that he'll be brought back to the island and resurrected and will serve as a proxy for Christian Shepherd to get them back on the island.
Ben always has a plan. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 27, 2009, 09:55:15 AM He seemed genuinely disturbed though when Locke mentioned Eloise Hawking. He didn't have the demeanor of someone who was simply waiting to ferret out required info before offing the guy. The look on his face wasn't "Oh, so it's her? Got it. Don't need your ass anymore." It was more like "Oh Shit!! Her?!? I'm fucked unless I choke this bitch right here!"
Short version: He was more :ye_gods: than :oh_i_see:. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 27, 2009, 10:23:47 AM Nothing I love more than an avatar bandwagon. :drill:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on February 27, 2009, 10:33:22 AM If Desmond or Penny dies I will fly into a rage. I actually cried when they were reunited - one of the most touching moments I have EVER seen on an entertainment medium.
Fucking masterpiece of a series. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on February 27, 2009, 10:56:20 AM I missed series 3 and the first half of 4, kinda gave up on this. Back into it now, I know Ben pretended to be that crashed Balloon guy, was it ever explained where he came from and how he got on the island? Also what's the war about between him and Whitmore, is it just for control of the island?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 27, 2009, 11:20:42 AM From wikipedia.
EDIT: Reminds me how so many of the characters have daddy issues. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on February 27, 2009, 11:48:17 AM Thanks, sounds interesting.
edit, Heh, I actually caught the end of that episode before, I remember the Jacob in the shack part and the gas attack. It was worth watching the whole thing just to see the evil Harry Potter. Think I'll try to catch up with the other episodes I've missed. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 27, 2009, 02:11:39 PM Thanks, sounds interesting. edit, Heh, I actually caught the end of that episode before, I remember the Jacob in the shack part and the gas attack. It was worth watching the whole thing just to see the evil Harry Potter. Think I'll try to catch up with the other episodes I've missed. The first half of season three was kinda slow moving and clunky, but they made up for it in the second half and season four and five have been just fantastic fun. Having a known end date has done wonders for them tightening up the pacing and getting things moving at a good clip. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on February 27, 2009, 02:21:14 PM If only it worked the same for BSG.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 27, 2009, 02:23:58 PM My favorite thing about Ben is that the character was supposed to be in 2 episodes and Emmerson was so damn good at the delivery of one line "Got any milk?" that the character has evolved into the central pivot-point of the entire series. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBuuT6x4IL4 Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on February 27, 2009, 02:32:05 PM That link lead me to this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfgcZgcYLdY Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 27, 2009, 03:10:20 PM That reminds me of one of my favorite scenes: Ben scaring the rabbit to death (http://abc.go.com/player/index?pn=index&show=93372&season=96319&episode=73512×tamp=835) :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 27, 2009, 04:34:39 PM To be honest, that last episode bored the crap out me until people started dying. It basically told you nothing you didn't already know. What did we learn exactly from all this crap except the fact that Locke is alive on the island in the future with all the future people? Whitmoore and Ben are still dicking everybody over because they had a powerplay on the island? That's a small revelation at best that we inferred from seeing Whitmoore as a kid on the island. That Ben offed Locke? Like we didn't see that one coming a mile away.
I didn't really like it because it went nowhere. We knew what Locke was doing, we knew why, we knew he got back, we knew he was dead, and we knew the people got back on the island. If we have to suffer through more of the POV-of-the-same-timespan crap, I'm just going to stop watching until it all comes out on video and I can fast forward. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 04, 2009, 08:13:14 PM Sweet mother. Tonight's episode rocked.
The statue had very long hair. It almost looked womanly from the back, but it also had pointy ears. :uhrr: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on March 04, 2009, 10:14:13 PM Conjecture is that it was of the Egyptian god Anubis, part man, part jackal.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on March 04, 2009, 11:16:18 PM Juliet deserves better than to be everyone's fallback romance option. Please, Sawyer, don't be an asshole like Jack and leave her twisting at the first sight of Kate's smile.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on March 05, 2009, 12:11:41 AM Sweet mother. Tonight's episode rocked. Yeah this was a lot of fun. I hope we get to spend a couple episodes back in Dharma time. I wonder whenabouts Young Ben Linus shows up in this timeline.... ^^ Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 05, 2009, 05:18:42 AM The only negative thing about this episode is my rising dread that there will be another goddamn love triangle involving Kate. Enough of those already!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 05, 2009, 02:28:50 PM Agreed about the love triangle, and the awesomeness of the episode.
Trying to figure out the timelines - they are in 1974. Most likely Ben and his dad are already on the island, which means there is probably about 15 years before Ben ganks all the Dharma folks (didn't he do it on his 21st birthday). Horace has appeared before, building Jacob's shack, and appeared to be in a time loop then. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 05, 2009, 03:07:47 PM All the time travel might end up ironing out some of the inexplicable stuff that's been getting chalked up as fantasy. If all the main characters are back in the Dharma days they're in a very good position to set up just about anything weird that happened in the first few seasons.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 05, 2009, 03:10:52 PM Juliet deserves better than to be everyone's fallback romance option. Juliet is awesome. A great, great character: cool, calm, massively competent, very attractive in a mature and unselfconscious manner. She and Ben are the best characters on the show.... though new, improved Sawyer is close behind. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Kirth on March 06, 2009, 03:02:52 PM Agreed about the love triangle, and the awesomeness of the episode. Trying to figure out the timelines - they are in 1974. Most likely Ben and his dad are already on the island, which means there is probably about 15 years before Ben ganks all the Dharma folks (didn't he do it on his 21st birthday). Horace has appeared before, building Jacob's shack, and appeared to be in a time loop then. 1974 is when they first encounter the dharma people. I believe currently they are in 1977. Horace in a time loop was a dream, or a actual time loop who knows :uhrr: Ban gassed dharma in the early 90's . so the time adds up I spose. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 09, 2009, 09:11:18 PM Everyone is terribly broken on this show, and somehow they all fit "logically" according to the authors. I don't believe any of that personally. I like where the show has gone so far with this season, but I'm hoping they stop showing us what we already know. It's getting old. If I can boil an entire one hour show into 2 sentences, and nobody loses a step, that's a failure in my book.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on March 11, 2009, 11:12:48 AM It's going to be interesting to see who from the cast end up being the corpses in the caves with the backgammon game. If my memory isn't too fuzzy, they found male and female skeletons in the caves with what I assume was the backgammon set Locke and Michael were playing with in season 1. I had an inkling that time travel was going to be a factor at that point. Seemed like too much of a coincidence that right after Locke is playing backgammon that they also find backgammon pieces on the corpses.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on March 11, 2009, 12:35:26 PM Probably Bernard and Rose.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Morfiend on March 19, 2009, 10:21:08 AM This season has just blown me away. I was to the point of about dropping the show 2 seasons ago. Last season really picked it up, and this season has been awesome. I am glad they ditched the "focus on one character's past or future thing", as I think that has allowed them to really get more done in an episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on March 19, 2009, 11:50:31 AM I like the New and Improved Sawyer. Particularly when he dropped the well-deserved hammer on Jack.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 19, 2009, 12:54:43 PM I think someone said earlier that the Producers never had any plan to keep Jack as a character -- so I guess Sawyer as the man was always in the cards.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 19, 2009, 01:48:26 PM Still not as good as season 4 but I expect that to change once the shit hits the fan.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on March 19, 2009, 02:05:34 PM Sawyer and Kate batting eyelids at each other is going to get old fast, but I'm enjoying the whole time line thing.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 19, 2009, 03:00:10 PM I like the New and Improved Sawyer. Particularly when he dropped the well-deserved hammer on Jack. This. It was about time someone did a good job of smacking him around a little bit. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Morfiend on March 19, 2009, 03:03:03 PM Sawyer and Kate batting eyelids at each other is going to get old fast, but I'm enjoying the whole time line thing. I can't wait for Juliet to put Kate in her place next episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 19, 2009, 03:05:15 PM I can't wait for Juliet to put Kate in her place next episode. I'm looking forward to that as well. Speaking of next week, from the preview, it seems as though all hell breaks loose. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 19, 2009, 03:05:56 PM WTF does Jack care, he's glad someone (who isn't insane) is stepping up. Sawyer isn't going to have much time bask in the glory of tell Jack to STFU.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on March 19, 2009, 04:13:06 PM Time travel as a mysterious force operating in the background is one thing.
Actually pulling off a time travel tale on a television series... ...in an era where the writers read their own fan sites and change the stories to confound the viewers? I'm not so sure. I fully expect that by the end of the series, we will have discovered Rambaldi's remains on the Slaver shipwreck and a secret crypto device that is continuously broadcasting (via 15th century technology) a repeating series of numbers... 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 ... that are the key to activating another Rambaldi device that the Russians built on 1954 and which looks suspiciously like an A-bomb, but is really an H2O molecule exciter that will boil the ocean if it is activated at the Orchid. In the final episode, Sidney will parachute into the Dharma compound (wearing only a cocktail dress) to kill Kate, who is really her grandmother and working for the Russians. The only one left standing will be Jack Bristoe (aka Jacob) the evil genius. fade to black. Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on March 19, 2009, 05:06:21 PM Sawyer and Kate batting eyelids at each other is going to get old fast, but I'm enjoying the whole time line thing. I can't wait for Juliet to put Kate in her place next episode. I was amused when Juliet left Kate off the passenger list only to swoop in at the last second and "save" her. That was a serious "don't fuck with me" right there. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 19, 2009, 06:23:26 PM Time travel as a mysterious force operating in the background is one thing. Actually pulling off a time travel tale on a television series... ...in an era where the writers read their own fan sites and change the stories to confound the viewers? I'm not so sure. There are some nice indications that the story has been adequately planned out from fairly early on.... The latest: - Sawyer and Kate are building a runway at the beginning of season 3, which is what the plane lands on in season 5. - Juliet lives at Dharma in the past, where a young Ben Linus also lives. In one of the Juliet centric episodes from 3/4, someone comments on Ben having a crush on Juliet by saying "She looks just like her" and nothing else. Is an adolescent crush on time-traveller Juliet the reason why he has the Season 3/4 Juliet fixation? - The dude in the communications center this past episode is the guy that killed himself in the hatch, right before Desmond shows up. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 19, 2009, 06:28:39 PM Sawyer and Kate batting eyelids at each other is going to get old fast, but I'm enjoying the whole time line thing. I can't wait for Juliet to put Kate in her place next episode. I was amused when Juliet left Kate off the passenger list only to swoop in at the last second and "save" her. That was a serious "don't fuck with me" right there. This was clever, and very ambiguous. When Juliet picks up the list, she's told that only two people had refused to take the sedatives. That means that it could have been that Juliet had to do far more paperwork to fake Kate onto the sub. Or it could just be Juliet firing a warning shot, to stop Kate from fucking up another of her romances. Juliet is canny enough, and devious enough, to pull off the later. She's been portrayed as pretty goddamn ruthless though (she might have the highest body count of killed in cold blood, next to Ben), so if the scheme occured to her why didn't she just fuck it up to the point where Kate is screwed? Hmm. I think I just implied Juliet screws Kate.... I'll be in my bunk. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 19, 2009, 07:18:55 PM So the Island isn't killing pregnant woman and their babies. Probably whatever was released from the Tempest is doing it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on March 19, 2009, 07:45:33 PM Fucking awesome.
I have a bad feeling Sawyer is the start of the downfall for the Dharma folk. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 19, 2009, 11:35:54 PM Sawyer's cool, Kate's back, and Juliet's gonna go horribly nuts.
Still, this episode is completely forgettable. Oceanic three get into Dharma through Sawyer's lies, and Sayid gets tossed in jail. That was it. Fade to fucking black. Absolutely nothing happened yet again. For basically the 3rd time in a row. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on March 19, 2009, 11:43:10 PM There were quite a lot of reveals and character movements in this ep actually (Ethan, what happened to the plane, Sun/Ben/Christian, Radzinsky, the Swan, Sawyer/Jack showdown, Jack/Juliet showdown, Kate/Juliet showdown).
Hurley's "uh, wut?" made the ep worth it just by itself. Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on March 20, 2009, 06:12:15 AM Time travel as a mysterious force operating in the background is one thing. Actually pulling off a time travel tale on a television series... ...in an era where the writers read their own fan sites and change the stories to confound the viewers? I'm not so sure. There are some nice indications that the story has been adequately planned out from fairly early on.... I hope so, since I enjoy the show. My point is that Time Travel (more so than, say, your average lusty-action-soap) requires razor sharp writing and editing to keep us all from turning into heaps'o'Hurley - uh, wut? I'm simply not convinced that the current TV milieu will ignore the interwebs and deliver a coherent story. The temptation is too great, and past habits already indicate a weakness. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 20, 2009, 07:21:36 AM There were quite a lot of reveals and character movements in this ep actually (Ethan, what happened to the plane, Sun/Ben/Christian, Radzinsky, the Swan, Sawyer/Jack showdown, Jack/Juliet showdown, Kate/Juliet showdown). Hurley's "uh, wut?" made the ep worth it just by itself. I'm getting worn out by character movements though. That's all well and good but you actually have to have an advancing story involved. This entire episode could be described as buildup to some future event. That's shitty. We've done that before in the second season as they went through backstory after backstory while the plot went absolutely nowhere. It's happening again in my book. The actual revelations/actions/deaths are few and far between. EDIT: I'll say this as well, it's not just me who is getting tired of lack of momentum in the middle. They dropped ~4M viewers over the last 3 episodes. People are getting bored of character interplay. "Namaste" was the lowest number of viewers they've ever had at 9M. Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on March 20, 2009, 07:53:08 AM Yeah, I have to say that while a Juliet vs Kate showdown has been building up for a while I'm completely bored with the whole love
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 20, 2009, 07:59:26 AM Yeah, I have to say that while a Juliet vs Kate showdown has been building up for a while I'm completely bored with the whole love I want Jack and Kate dead. They both irritate the shit out of me. Jack is a moron, and I'm shocked anybody would actually pay attention to anything he says. Also, writers should look to House on how to create a character that's a doctor with a substance abuse issue and a haunted past. Kate just won't go away. Her character has run it's course beyond just being an obstacle for the more interesting characters of Sawyer and Juliet. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on March 20, 2009, 12:16:25 PM I wouldn't mind Jack so much if they made him way more angsty and dark. As they un-dark Sawyer, why not dark the shit out of Jack? He's even got a decent face for it when he's gone all scruffy. Not totally in love with the new Sawyer, either, but I reckon he's in transition and maybe it'll work out ok. Kate can go any time. Now or even sooner. I start to yawn when it even looks as if it's going to be a Kate moment. This show is addicting even when I don't know what the hell is going on.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on March 20, 2009, 01:03:10 PM Eh, I still like most all the Characters who are left. They've killed off everybody I didn't like at this point (except Bernard and Rose, but they've disappeared thankfully). Only Character I don't really like is Juliet. Character is just... boring/shallow to me. Don't like all the screen time they're giving her.
Having said all that, this season still kicks ass and I've enjoyed every episode so far. Love all the information they're giving away. Though I'm a bit aggravated that nobody is asking WHAT THE FUCK IS THE DHARMA INITIATIVE UP TO. Sawyer and all of them seem to be aware of everything that's going on, with all the crazy ass science experiments they built, yet none of the new people back seem to be asking them ANYTHING. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 20, 2009, 01:13:08 PM I think Jack would have eventually gotten to the question of just what is the DI doing on the island if Sawyer wouldn't have chewed him and spit him out. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Morfiend on March 20, 2009, 03:15:25 PM On the topic of characters. I think the guy playing Ben is amazing. The writers couldnt have pulled off a lot of the wacky shit they did with out the actor of Ben being completely believable in his bullshit. He does creepy so well, and yet can still seem like your friend.
I like Juliet a lot. Jack from season 1 and 2 wasnt bad, but then they kind of turned him in to a steriotype of himself. Same with Kate, both of them are just annoying now. I will echo the awesomeness of Hurley's "ummm wut" comment. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on March 20, 2009, 03:40:45 PM I think Jack would have eventually gotten to the question of just what is the DI doing on the island if Sawyer wouldn't have chewed him and spit him out. :awesome_for_real: One thing I liked about that whole exchange was at the end. Jack with his "Hey, yeah, your right, it DOES feel good to not to be the one under pressure to save everybody's ass yet again" comment and smile, and Sawyer looking on at his retreating form with the "Well shit" look.I also liked how somebody finally just said fuck it and smashed Ben over the head instead of listening to him. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 20, 2009, 03:44:08 PM I will echo the awesomeness of Hurley's "ummm wut" comment. the writer's seem to often use Hurley as the explanation vehicle for the audience. I like the way they do it; namely, he's not dumb -- he asks questions exactly in the manner the audience would ask. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 25, 2009, 06:40:35 PM Ok thank god, something finally happened tonight. Good episode! :grin:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 25, 2009, 10:14:56 PM Ok thank god, something finally happened tonight. Good episode! :grin: I enjoyed it. It appears they're going to start doing flashbacks to explain how some of them came to be on the plane. I believe next week is going to explain the Kate and Aaron thing and why she decided to go back to the island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on March 26, 2009, 07:36:39 AM Good try sayid but unfortunately as ben found out if the island does not want something to happen it probably will fix itself.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on March 26, 2009, 07:42:37 AM Good try sayid but unfortunately as ben found out if the island does not want something to happen it probably will fix itself. I thought that too. But is this the first real instance of the 6 explicitly doing something that has ramifications on the future? First time the show is going to try and explain the whole time paradox thing? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 26, 2009, 09:00:17 AM Good try sayid but unfortunately as ben found out if the island does not want something to happen it probably will fix itself. I thought that too. But is this the first real instance of the 6 explicitly doing something that has ramifications on the future? First time the show is going to try and explain the whole time paradox thing? Farraday and Desmond. Desmond didn't remember until later. Farraday tried to warn Charlotte (whose full name was Charlotte S Lewis) not to return to the island, which didn't take either. Farraday, and his mother, have pretty explicitly stated that you can't change the past. Most probably, Sayid is going to find out his actions are entirely futile to serve as more fuel for him moping around. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 26, 2009, 09:05:36 AM Great, now the show has to start over from the beginning to show what things would be like without Ben. :drillf:
Sayid can't kill Ben until Locke comes to the Island. If anything Sayid helped Ben cement his position with the others. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 26, 2009, 09:16:38 AM Great, now the show has to start over from the beginning to show what things would be like without Ben. :drillf: Sayid can't kill Ben until Locke comes to the Island. If anything Sayid helped Ben cement his position with the others. Either: A. Young Ben survives, and it's Sayid's shooting him that turns him into the full blown sociopath we know and love. B. The island brings him back, and sociopath etc etc. C. Old Ben Linus has no relation to young Ben Linus.... Ben Linus is just an identity he adopted to weasel into Dharma. Which would mean Sayid killed an innocent kid. Spoiler from popular media on this season and finale, do not read if you want to maintain your sanity and enjoyment, etc: Also: How many people loved seeing Larry (from Larry, Darryl and Darryl in Newhart; otherwise known as the innkeeper guy from Deadwood; or the Joker's right hand man in the original Batman movie) as the Dharma interrogator? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on March 26, 2009, 09:28:37 AM Gah, thank you. I wondered why the hell he looked so familiar.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 26, 2009, 09:38:43 AM Gah, thank you. I wondered why the hell he looked so familiar. EB Farnum. Gah, had to look it up. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 26, 2009, 11:35:30 PM So that really was Sanderson? Those glasses threw me off, but the voice was quite familiar.
Superb episode. Though I didn't get why Sawyer didn't say Sayid was one of his crew from the shipwreck, you know the people they supposedy stayed on the Island for. Edit: That =/= Those Title: Re: Lost Post by: Reg on March 27, 2009, 01:16:25 AM He might have done that if Sayid had shown up a few years earlier but explaining where he's been for the last three years would be pretty tough.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 27, 2009, 04:21:27 AM I'd use "Being a prisoner of the Hostiles and finally being able to escape. Thats why his hands are bound together".
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nevermore on March 27, 2009, 07:04:52 AM How many people loved seeing Larry (from Larry, Darryl and Darryl in Newhart; otherwise known as the innkeeper guy from Deadwood; or the Joker's right hand man in the original Batman movie) as the Dharma interrogator? William Sanderson. I remember him from Blade Runner. Got the voice right away. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 27, 2009, 09:34:33 AM I'd use "Being a prisoner of the Hostiles and finally being able to escape. Thats why his hands are bound together". Why did Jin bring him in as a hostile then, if Jin was on the boat with Sayid? It also exposes Juliet, Sawyer, and Jin to danger if something goes wrong with that cover story. Look at the way Sawyer added Jack, Hurley, and Kate to the submarine list: If one gets exposed, it's difficult to trace it back to the three that have been in Dharma for the last three years, unless the exposed person rolls. A big part of this is Sawyer has taken over being the boss from Jack, and he's going to fuck up. He's going to drop the ball, make quick decisions that backfire, and get people pissed at the way he's handling things. Just like Jack. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on March 27, 2009, 03:36:17 PM How many people loved seeing Larry (from Larry, Darryl and Darryl in Newhart; otherwise known as the innkeeper guy from Deadwood; or the Joker's right hand man in the original Batman movie) as the Dharma interrogator? William Sanderson. I remember him from Blade Runner. Got the voice right away. I've got to say that the Lost showrunners do an amazing job of getting actors for supporting roles. More times than with any other TV series I've had to go find out where I know a guest star from. Every time I see Charles Whitmore I'm convinced the showrunners wanted Malcolm Mcdowell but couldn't land him for some reason. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on March 30, 2009, 05:31:46 AM Alan Dale (Charles Widmore) is really a superb actor, the best of the show along with Michael Emerson; both have quite a long experience in theatre, and you can notice it when they
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 01, 2009, 07:00:15 PM Really good episode tonight. A couple of thoughts:
I'm not a huge Kate fan, but I thought her having to leave Aaron was pretty damn emotional. Adult Ben waking up to see John Locke sitting right next to him was just priceless. :grin: Hurley asking all the time travel questions that we all wanna know and the expressions he gives when he gets the explanations from Miles? Good stuff. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 01, 2009, 07:05:19 PM Next week's episode looks :drill:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 02, 2009, 12:56:50 AM This season continues to be made of pure awesome.
Hurly and Miles arguing about time travel was great. "Hello, Ben. Welcome back to the land of the living." Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 02, 2009, 07:20:59 AM I loved Miles's "...huh. I never thought of that." Also his subsequent "hey, ask me more questions about time travel!"
So Ben is a twisted fucker because Sayid shot him because he'd grow up to be a twisted fucker and so Richard saves his life while somehow turning him into a twisted fucker? That sounds about right. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 02, 2009, 07:53:48 AM Well, its very interesting to see that there is some sort of transformation process involved in becoming an actual other. Explaining why they all have freaky jungle super powers and are completely committed to the cause (what ever the fuck that may be). Probably should have guessed it after what happened to the French.
Now, I'm happy that they have an explanation for Ben not remembering Sayid (that was bugging me as well). However, that still doesn't explain why he wouldn't remember any of the other Oceanic people he lived with for 3 freak'in years. Particularly Sawyer, who was a major figure in the Dharma initiative. Good episode overall though. Next weeks does look awesome. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 02, 2009, 08:06:19 AM Maybe that's what the whole "get their names" thing was from when they crashed.
If there is an Other transformation process why didn't they do it to Locke? I don't like the "Ben won't remember" bit. It seems much, much cooler that Ben remembers and instead of being upset, he ambitious enough to use a person like Sayid to his advantage. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 02, 2009, 08:33:14 AM A whole lot of the "wtf" shit that happened in the first couple of seasons can be explained pretty readily by the Others having met these people in the past but being cagey enough not to admit to it. I think the writers are doing a pretty good job here of sewing up loose ends.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 02, 2009, 08:38:55 AM Maybe that's what the whole "get their names" thing was from when they crashed. If there is an Other transformation process why didn't they do it to Locke? I don't like the "Ben won't remember" bit. It seems much, much cooler that Ben remembers and instead of being upset, he ambitious enough to use a person like Sayid to his advantage. Locke had to murder his own father (or at least be responsible for it indirectly) to be accepted by the Others. Perhaps Ben wasn't officially accepted until he wiped out the Dharma Initiative. There's probably more to it than that, but those were my first thoughts. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 02, 2009, 08:46:28 AM Locke had to murder his own father (or at least be responsible for it indirectly) to be accepted by the Others. Perhaps Ben wasn't officially accepted until he wiped out the Dharma Initiative. Which just happened to include his own father. :ye_gods: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nevermore on April 02, 2009, 08:48:14 AM The Others: We have daddy issues!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 02, 2009, 08:57:03 AM The Others: We have daddy issues! Hmm, come to think of it...who on the show does NOT have daddy issues? Almost everyone on the show has this in common if you think about it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on April 02, 2009, 08:57:20 AM Maybe that's what the whole "get their names" thing was from when they crashed. If there is an Other transformation process why didn't they do it to Locke? I don't like the "Ben won't remember" bit. It seems much, much cooler that Ben remembers and instead of being upset, he ambitious enough to use a person like Sayid to his advantage. Yeah, this would have been the much cooler move, IMO, not to mention completely in character for Ben. That he HAD known and not said anything would have been much, much more Machiavellian and calculated. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 02, 2009, 09:24:08 AM so where's Faraday? we saw him in the pilot helping to build the Orchid. He's kind of important to the whole time travel thingy...
yeah, the Hurley/Miles dialogue is great -- "let's now take questions from the viewers!". And then they explain some of it via Richard same episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 02, 2009, 09:28:05 AM Faraday hitched a sub back to the mainland to start experimenting with time travel on rats.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on April 02, 2009, 09:47:09 AM I'm watching the episode right now and I just thought about how awesome and funny it'd be if Young Ben dies and Kate+Roger have a child and name it Ben, who then grows up to be big Ben.
I think my giggity muscle flexed when baby Aaron asked for milk Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 02, 2009, 12:19:41 PM Who says Ben DOESN'T remember these Dharma people in the future? He's never said he does, but he never said he doesn't. I wouldn't put it past Ben to have known who was going to return to the '70's the whole time, which may have explained why he's done some of the things he's done to particular people. It may also explain why he took those 3 characters and held them prisoner at the beginning of season 2.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 02, 2009, 01:34:17 PM maybe. but I thought it was the mysterious Jacob who asked for that list.
Who or what is Jacob, where and what is Christian and where is Clair all will be fun to discover. Remember, when Jack found Christian's coffin, the body was gone... Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on April 02, 2009, 01:43:44 PM I found it helpful to remember that the smoke monster can take the shape of people, a lot more things make sense then. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 02, 2009, 08:14:57 PM You know, for an hardened assassin like Sayid standing over a fallen body where you shot the guy in the chest, he would put one in the head. Would you ever walk away from a person that integral that you wanted dead without making absofuckinglutely sure if you're standing over their body holding a gun? These things bother me. Also Ben took the shot right in the damn heart in the middle of the fucking jungle. He's toast.
ANYway, the best part of the episode to me was Jack finally getting it right. The rest of the characters seem to go on some moral crusade about saving a man who is basically responsible for mass genocide and their little 70s shantylife. THEN, after Richard warns them that by giving Ben to him that it's basically going to turn him into the fun-loving pyscho that they remember, they still do it?!?! Nobody even seems to bring up the fact that Ben is going to kill them all in any of this. The line of the show was Kate saying to Jack, "I don't like the new you. I like the old you who tried to help people instead of waiting for stuff to happen." Jack: "You didn't like the old me, Kate." Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on April 02, 2009, 08:19:14 PM I DO love how everyone is indicating that they've all taken loads of, and are entirely done with, Kate's shit.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 02, 2009, 08:31:07 PM Maybe she offs herself and makes everyone really happy in a later episode. Smoke Monster sacrifices!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 02, 2009, 08:40:15 PM I found it helpful to remember that the smoke monster can take the shape of people, a lot more things make sense then. :awesome_for_real: I need a refresher. When did this happen? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on April 02, 2009, 09:10:18 PM I found it helpful to remember that the smoke monster can take the shape of people, a lot more things make sense then. :awesome_for_real: I need a refresher. When did this happen? When some fanboi interviewed the writers. Apparently it's implied. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 02, 2009, 09:37:37 PM I always assume Ben knows a hell of a lot more than he lets on. If he doesn't he fakes it. In both cases he will lie about it. If we know anything about Ben, it's that he's a compulsive liar, manipulative to the last, and he never, ever gives anyone any information for free.
"Ben lies. That's what he does." - Juliet The last episode almost makes me think we'll be spared from yet another round of the kate/jack/sawyer relationship triangle crap, which would be an added bonus. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Triforcer on April 02, 2009, 09:48:09 PM I found it helpful to remember that the smoke monster can take the shape of people, a lot more things make sense then. :awesome_for_real: I need a refresher. When did this happen? When some fanboi interviewed the writers. Apparently it's implied. Didn't the smoke talk to Eko (in the shape of his brother) at some point? I stopped watching two years ago but seem to remember that. Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on April 03, 2009, 06:34:38 AM He could not because he had not. Got to love time travel. Everything they do in the past they had already done in the past so nothing really can be changed all they can do is what they were already going to do but do not know they did.
You know, for an hardened assassin like Sayid standing over a fallen body where you shot the guy in the chest, he would put one in the head. Would you ever walk away from a person that integral that you wanted dead without making absofuckinglutely sure if you're standing over their body holding a gun? These things bother me. Also Ben took the shot right in the damn heart in the middle of the fucking jungle. He's toast. ANYway, the best part of the episode to me was Jack finally getting it right. The rest of the characters seem to go on some moral crusade about saving a man who is basically responsible for mass genocide and their little 70s shantylife. THEN, after Richard warns them that by giving Ben to him that it's basically going to turn him into the fun-loving pyscho that they remember, they still do it?!?! Nobody even seems to bring up the fact that Ben is going to kill them all in any of this. The line of the show was Kate saying to Jack, "I don't like the new you. I like the old you who tried to help people instead of waiting for stuff to happen." Jack: "You didn't like the old me, Kate." Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 08, 2009, 06:40:00 PM My awesome meter just broke.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 08, 2009, 06:43:00 PM Yeah, I don't know how they're going to top that episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on April 08, 2009, 06:47:40 PM Quote from: Instant Messenger Ashrik: If he broke up the Penny/Desmond destiny match up, I would have thrown a brick through my TV Chris: When he shot Desmond Chris: I screamed so loud I shit my pants and passed out Ashrik: My heart stopped Chris: yes but thank god Ashrik: this new show looks very very promising Chris: i bet its lame Ashrik: I feel as if I'm expected to go "Oh boy, that IS unusual" every few minutes Chris: hahaha Chris: i know your doing that alone in your room Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on April 08, 2009, 07:43:10 PM I found it helpful to remember that the smoke monster can take the shape of people, a lot more things make sense then. :awesome_for_real: I need a refresher. When did this happen? When some fanboi interviewed the writers. Apparently it's implied. Didn't the smoke talk to Eko (in the shape of his brother) at some point? I stopped watching two years ago but seem to remember that. Yes. Ben seeing Alex pretty much nails this down. Also, "smoke monster! Form of...." best explains things like Kate's horse and some of the other bits where people see folks that aren't on the island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on April 08, 2009, 09:14:09 PM I love how they reveal something now and you get to see it within the same episode. If this was season three going to the houses, summoning the smoke monster, and then actually going to where he comes from would have been 5 episodes.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 08, 2009, 09:48:54 PM Wow, awesome episode. Smoke monster form of his daughter bitching him out at the end was awesome. Also, it again confirms what a bastard he is after it read his future plans from his head. Even after I said I would NEVER AGAIN fall for Ben being decent in the slightest, they spent the whole damn episode building him up for redemption and sympathy, right up until the very end. And I AGAIN started to fall for it. God damn this show.
Also, the casual way they just sort of ended the Ceasar character was pretty awesome. Has to be one of the shortest lived characters ever introduced, heh. Also: Because he was busy trying to kill Penny (since he saw Desmond at the church), just like he promised Widmore he would. That's exactly what I'm thinking as well. I guess we'll find out soon if he was successful. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 09, 2009, 12:42:36 AM Wow, awesome episode. Smoke monster form of his daughter bitching him out at the end was awesome. Also, it again confirms what a bastard he is after it read his future plans from his head. Even after I said I would NEVER AGAIN fall for Ben being decent in the slightest, they spent the whole damn episode building him up for redemption and sympathy, right up until the very end. And I AGAIN started to fall for it. God damn this show. Indeed. Every single goddamn time. Wow, season four, you do not disappoint me. Soooo.... any bets until how long before Ben goes ahead and tries to kill Locke again anyway? ^^ Also, crazy theory time, I think we're due for a visit to "The Incident" at the Swan station, with a special guest visit from Daniel and our other 1970s time travelers. My money is on that being their path Back To The Future (Hurley waving his hand waiting for it to vanish just killed me...) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Sunbury on April 09, 2009, 05:07:35 AM Calling it now - (not read from spoiler) - we will never 'really know' exactly who/what/where/how the Smoke Monster is even when Lost ends.
Just some ancient thing on the island. The Others/Hostiles don't even have a name for it (according to Ben...), but they use it/follow it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 09, 2009, 05:44:05 AM I think last night's episode was the best of the season and one of the best of the series. That episode was just full of greatness. A couple of things I found particularly amusing/interesting:
John Locke. He seems very at-ease with everything going on. When Ben tells Sun to look out the window after she talks about him being dead, I expected him to be swinging on one of the swingsets. He just sorta wanders around kicking at the dirt, looking at the grass, and just knows things all of the sudden. He was already my favorite character, but right now, he's just so full of win. I saw Anubis on the wall in the temple as I'm sure everyone else did. I guess that basically confirms what the statue is. Speaking of the statue, what in the world are the other survivors of the flight doing with the "What lies in the shadow of the statute?" bullshit? I'm assuming they work for Whidmore? I can't see them just crashing on the island and then start quizzing people about the statue or having secret codes with each other. It's a little weird. Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on April 09, 2009, 08:11:27 AM Speaking of the statue, what in the world are the other survivors of the flight doing with the "What lies in the shadow of the statute?" bullshit? I'm assuming they work for Whidmore? I can't see them just crashing on the island and then start quizzing people about the statue or having secret codes with each other. It's a little weird. Either that, another sect, or they went batshit insane. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 09, 2009, 08:52:27 AM Speaking of the statue, what in the world are the other survivors of the flight doing with the "What lies in the shadow of the statute?" bullshit? I'm assuming they work for Whidmore? I can't see them just crashing on the island and then start quizzing people about the statue or having secret codes with each other. It's a little weird. Well, the chick was obviously working for somebody, as she's the one who captured Sayid. I'd say most likely Whidmore, but they sort of hinted she was working for somebody else. In any event, she was obviously in on all this before they even got on the plane, and I guess it would make sense she would have some partners on the same plane to go with her.Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 09, 2009, 09:01:23 AM Don't really care who they are. Odds are there are other people looking for the Island. But my guess is that they are Dharma 2.0. That will get sorted out later. Love how Lapidus decides not to follow Locke and ends up in deep shit.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 09, 2009, 09:55:26 AM I thought it was pretty obvious at the time that the chick that captured Sayid was hired (indirectly) by Ben under false pretenses to ensure Sayid would be on the airplane. She told Sayid that she was hired by the family of one of the guys Sayid assassinated (the one he shot on the golf course). Ben of course directed Sayid to assassinate said individual and would be able to fabricate the plausible story that she was being hired by said family to bring Sayid to justice.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on April 09, 2009, 12:18:39 PM I thought it was pretty obvious at the time that the chick that captured Sayid was hired (indirectly) by Ben under false pretenses to ensure Sayid would be on the airplane. She told Sayid that she was hired by the family of one of the guys Sayid assassinated (the one he shot on the golf course). Ben of course directed Sayid to assassinate said individual and would be able to fabricate the plausible story that she was being hired by said family to bring Sayid to justice. That was the obvious conclusion until right at the end when she came at Lapidus with "What lies in the shadow of the statue?" It could still be the case though, if what's happening to her and her buddies is the same thing that happened to Rousseau's shipmates.I'm curious about Ben's statement to Rousseau when he took her baby. "If you ever hear whispers, you run the other way." I've been looking forward to finding out more about those whispers for a long time. Has anyone else read the transcriptions of them that have been decoded online? Fascinating stuff. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on April 09, 2009, 02:19:41 PM I thought it was pretty obvious at the time that the chick that captured Sayid was hired (indirectly) by Ben under false pretenses to ensure Sayid would be on the airplane. She told Sayid that she was hired by the family of one of the guys Sayid assassinated (the one he shot on the golf course). Ben of course directed Sayid to assassinate said individual and would be able to fabricate the plausible story that she was being hired by said family to bring Sayid to justice. That was the obvious conclusion until right at the end when she came at Lapidus with "What lies in the shadow of the statue?" It could still be the case though, if what's happening to her and her buddies is the same thing that happened to Rousseau's shipmates.I'm curious about Ben's statement to Rousseau when he took her baby. "If you ever hear whispers, you run the other way." I've been looking forward to finding out more about those whispers for a long time. Has anyone else read the transcriptions of them that have been decoded online? Fascinating stuff. Whispers = Others nearby, I think. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on April 09, 2009, 03:01:29 PM I bet time travel will explain everything in the end, the smoke is going to be skynet from the future or aliens landing in the past, they could tie it into BSG at this point. I'm enjoying it though.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 09, 2009, 03:09:26 PM I do hope we get a flashback to the distant past and the building of the temple at some point.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 09, 2009, 03:18:13 PM God did it!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 09, 2009, 03:43:52 PM whispers are the approaching smoke monster
smoke monster is an alien. Which explains time travelzor. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on April 09, 2009, 04:48:00 PM I bet time travel will explain everything in the end, the smoke is going to be skynet from the future or aliens landing in the past, they could tie it into BSG at this point. I'm enjoying it though. How awesome would verbal dueling between Ben and Adama be? Tigh can come along to play the straight man. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 10, 2009, 02:03:54 PM It could still be the case though, if what's happening to her and her buddies is the same thing that happened to Rousseau's shipmates. That's what I thought at first, but i doubt it now. From the very beginning of the episode, they were trying to move a giant crate off the plane, which obviously has something important in it. They're all part of a group that knew they'd end up on the island. So, they're either part of Widmore's group, or Dharma. Dharma people are known to use riddles ("what does one snowman say to the other"), so I'm going with them. I don't think the apparitions of dead people are being created by the smoke monster, though. You distinctly see the smoke monster go back into the grate before Ben's daughter shows up. I think whatever's responsible for the whispers is also what's capable of this. If the smoke monster is Cerebus, then the whispers/ghosts are Anubis? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evildrider on April 10, 2009, 02:24:25 PM Giant crate holding a Nuke?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on April 10, 2009, 02:26:54 PM I'd like to know where Faraday has ran off too. I liked him.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on April 10, 2009, 02:43:51 PM I'd like to know where Faraday has ran off too. I liked him. I'm still pissed at him for fucking up the end of Saving Private Ryan with his shitty sideplot. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evildrider on April 10, 2009, 03:40:50 PM I'd like to know where Faraday has ran off too. I liked him. Next ep has some stuff about him I think. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on April 10, 2009, 04:32:04 PM I'd like to know where Faraday has ran off too. I liked him. I think that, as we have seen in the very first scene of this season, he is closely watching the ongoing construction of the Orchid station. Oh, and Samwise wrote: Quote I do hope we get a flashback to the distant past and the building of the temple at some point. Well, not really about the temple, but... (small spoiler about the Statue, not the identity, of course) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 12, 2009, 01:50:40 PM The smoke monster taking the form of things is pretty crazy, but it adds to a lot of good drama like it did in the last episode. I do hope they go into detail what the deal is with the monster, because it was THE first question everyone had about the island. Not resolving that effectively would be shitty in my book.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 16, 2009, 09:10:36 AM Didn't see that reveal coming. Loved it. Also, "Ewoks suck, dude."
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 16, 2009, 10:24:16 AM Ewoks Suck should have been the title, that was funny. Still, they are getting really heavy-handed with "Daddy Issue Island" here. Is there a single character who had a decent father who stuck around and/or didn't abuse them?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: fatboy on April 16, 2009, 10:52:42 AM Didn't see that reveal coming. Loved it. Also, "Ewoks suck, dude." Being a die hard Star Wars fan, that was my favorite line of last night's show too. But a close second was Miles "That Douche is my dad." Cracked me up. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 16, 2009, 01:26:51 PM Still, they are getting really heavy-handed with "Daddy Issue Island" here. Is there a single character who had a decent father who stuck around and/or didn't abuse them? Well, we don't actually know what happened to Dr Candle. I do know that the only time we've ever seen him smile was when he was spending time with his son near the end of this episode. In all other cases he's been a cranky bastard. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on April 16, 2009, 02:26:41 PM So basically everyone so far who came on the chopper was born on the Island, or grew up there. So the odds of Daniel being a child on the island are pretty good. Odds of him being born as an Other even better! :D Maybe he is making friends with recovering bullet wound Ben right now.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 16, 2009, 02:34:09 PM So the odds of Daniel being a child on the island are pretty good. Odds of him being born as an Other even better! His mother Eloise appears to have been an Other, if she is (as I suspect) the blonde chick named "Elly" who had him at gunpoint while he was supposed to be defusing the bomb. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 16, 2009, 02:39:30 PM So the odds of Daniel being a child on the island are pretty good. Odds of him being born as an Other even better! His mother Eloise appears to have been an Other, if she is (as I suspect) the blonde chick named "Elly" who had him at gunpoint while he was supposed to be defusing the bomb. I believe she is. Also, I hope everyone noticed that the guy in the van who kidnapped Miles and tried to stop him from going to the island is the same guy that was with the chick on the other plane (the one that asked "what lies in the shadow of the statue"). Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 16, 2009, 03:12:11 PM I was just thinking to myself, this show doesn't have enough factions warring over the island. ENTER: Shadow of the Statue folks.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 16, 2009, 03:14:25 PM They gotta be Dharma Strikes Back.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on April 16, 2009, 03:24:00 PM Thought this was interesting. I don't follow lost that closely so not sure if this is a spoiler or not.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 16, 2009, 08:24:12 PM They gotta be Dharma Strikes Back. Yeah, I'm thinking that too. Introducing a new faction would seem a bit weird. Strange code-phrases (see "What did one snowman say to the other.") smell of Dharma as well. I'm really curious to see what the big twist will be at the end of this season. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 16, 2009, 08:31:07 PM "The Incident" would be the event that led to the installation of the "release valve", if I'm not mistaken. :drill:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 16, 2009, 08:42:32 PM Useful reference from Lost Past:
Full Orientation Video for The Swan Station: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYJf5rZQgb0 Interesting Dharma video from ComicCon 2008: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdWLYVRiin8 Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 17, 2009, 03:01:13 PM "The Incident" would be the event that led to the installation of the "release valve", if I'm not mistaken. :drill: Yes. The incident is the reason they needed "the button" if I'm remembering things correctly. My guess is the incident is caused by those in the 70s switching back to present time. Maybe something that Locke does? He seems to know exactly what the hell is going on and how he's going to fix it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 17, 2009, 03:48:13 PM I'm wondering how Faraday went back in time? Did I miss something there?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 17, 2009, 03:55:24 PM He came with everyone else, when they were skipping around randomly.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 17, 2009, 03:55:45 PM He came back with Sawyer and the others when they were first teleported back in time, and hooked up with the Dharma folk. He just sort of disappeared though, and they haven't said where he went. Apparently he went to Ann Arbor.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 17, 2009, 03:58:14 PM "The Incident" would be the event that led to the installation of the "release valve", if I'm not mistaken. :drill: Yes. The incident is the reason they needed "the button" if I'm remembering things correctly. My guess is the incident is caused by those in the 70s switching back to present time. Maybe something that Locke does? He seems to know exactly what the hell is going on and how he's going to fix it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 18, 2009, 02:19:28 PM He came back with Sawyer and the others when they were first teleported back in time, and hooked up with the Dharma folk. He just sort of disappeared though, and they haven't said where he went. Apparently he went to Ann Arbor. He was described as some dude out of Ann Arbor by a Dharma guy. It seemed like they didn't know him by name. If he was back there earlier with them, how did he get off the Island to Ann Arbor if he didn't meet with the Dharma folks and take their sub? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on April 18, 2009, 06:45:00 PM If memory serves the guy said that the sub was there with "people from Ann Arbor" or "scientists from Ann Arbor" so he was referring to them collectively. I think it is clear that Faraday became part of Dharma just like the others and has become part of the secret team, part of which included going back to Ann Arbor to talk to the Dharma initiators.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 18, 2009, 08:03:56 PM Yeah, rewatched this one last night. Dr Chang told Miles that the sub was bringing scientists from Ann Arbor.
I don't think Jughead will have anything to do with The Swan, though I do think we'll hear about it again -- either in the final episode this season or sometime next season. I'm starting to wonder if maybe the final episode might be named deceptively... I mean I assume "The Incident" is the one at The Swan, but perhaps that's misdirection... Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 18, 2009, 08:21:01 PM They are going to blow up the island at the end. You know it's coming.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 20, 2009, 09:59:13 PM Michael Emerson is entertaining:
http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/video/clips/michael-emerson-part-1-41609/1087731/ http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/video/clips/michael-emerson-part-2-41609/1087762/ Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 20, 2009, 11:18:56 PM He's outstanding. I can see why they just picked him up and ran with it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 21, 2009, 11:32:12 AM Moar Michael Emerson plz. Christ he is good. He needs film work.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 23, 2009, 05:24:26 AM Meh, WTB real episode plz. I was looking forward to Faraday coming back loaded with new found knowledge about The Island.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 23, 2009, 09:43:08 AM Motherfucks fooled me with a clip show. Ruined my Wednesday night plans. They need to legally start labeling clip shows in BOLD BRIGHT LETTERS on the previous week's previews.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 23, 2009, 11:59:20 AM Viewership is tanking lately. They had 13.5M viewers at the beginning of this season, and they were down to as few as 8.5M at episode 12. They have fallen way outside of the Top 10 shows on broadcast TV as well. American Idol and Dancing with the Stars had more viewers in one week than LOST has had total in it's last 6 episodes.
In short, the show is getting murdered because people are tired of their bullshit. Tossing a clip show out there is putting holes in an already sinking ship. I can't believe they pulled that nonsense. I mean Wheel of Fortune puts up better numbers than 8.5M. That's no joke, either. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 23, 2009, 11:59:51 AM I concur, I was sitting down excitedly in front of the TV, beer in hand, and then was suddenly all :heartbreak:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 23, 2009, 12:48:18 PM ya'll surprise -- I knew this was happening this week. It's to help the less interested catch up.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on April 23, 2009, 01:35:48 PM ya'll surprise -- I knew this was happening this week. It's to help the less interested catch up. The taint lickers shoulda ran it in the 8-9 timeslot right before a new episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on April 23, 2009, 01:38:20 PM Wife just told me this is supposedly getting a spinoff called "Flash Forward" or something like that. Look for it to be tied in with next week's Faraday episode and clips/ hints to be shown during the commercial break.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 23, 2009, 01:48:01 PM Not a Lost spinoff.
Story here (http://www.airlockalpha.com/news426284.html) Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on April 25, 2009, 08:42:52 AM Viewership is tanking lately. They had 13.5M viewers at the beginning of this season, and they were down to as few as 8.5M at episode 12. They have fallen way outside of the Top 10 shows on broadcast TV as well. American Idol and Dancing with the Stars had more viewers in one week than LOST has had total in it's last 6 episodes. In short, the show is getting murdered because people are tired of their bullshit. Tossing a clip show out there is putting holes in an already sinking ship. I can't believe they pulled that nonsense. I mean Wheel of Fortune puts up better numbers than 8.5M. That's no joke, either. I noticed the readership numbers too when I was on wikipedia the other day (looking to see how many more episodes there will be in this season) and it kind of disappointed me and reminded me why the quality of TV sucks. I actually think that this season has been great so far, and yet with viewer numbers tanking this season I guess I am far from the majority in what makes a tv show good. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 25, 2009, 04:29:17 PM I noticed the readership numbers too when I was on wikipedia the other day (looking to see how many more episodes there will be in this season) and it kind of disappointed me and reminded me why the quality of TV sucks. I actually think that this season has been great so far, and yet with viewer numbers tanking this season I guess I am far from the majority in what makes a tv show good. This. This has been a great season and probably my favorite season of the whole series. I guess I'm in the minority when it comes to my television viewing habits. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 26, 2009, 11:34:29 AM The average viewer isn't terribly intrigued with character interplay on a show about various mysteries. What they want is answers, and then more questions, with eventually more answers, some deaths, explosions, big events, etc. What they don't want is hour long segments of the show to drag in the middle while they learn about character minutia.
In this season we have: Season Opener - Time is shifting all over the place, bloody noses, Jack and Ben working together, Sayid and Hurley killing potential assassins, and Kate bailing out after the lawyers come a knocking. All in all it was a great opener. Episodes 2-4 - Crazy flaming arrows in the middle of the night, Hurley tries to get Sayid back to health, then turns himself over to the cops when Ben wants him to come back to the island. The timejumpers meet young Widmore, while Faraday's group gets captured and finds a nuke. Kate rambles around trying to find out who's behind the lawyers wanting "her" child. However, it's not Claire's mother, it's actually Ben. Shocker. Everyone meets on a dock. Sun is pissed. Charlotte continues to bleed out with timegroup. That was 3 episodes. Episode 5 - This is the first redeemer episode of the season. After this the numbers jump back up to over 13M viewers. The Smoke Monster is finally back, young Rousseau gets some killer background story, Charlotte finally dies off with an eerie confession, Locke meets Christian and cranks the wheel after busting his leg. This, imo, is one of the best episodes. Episode 6-9 - "aka the boring episodes that killed the viewership" - Jack puts his Dad's shoes on Locke, everyone gets on Flight 316. Locke is revived on the island. Flashback to Locke arriving from the wheel in Tunisia and working for Whitmore, but failing miserably to collect anyone. His driver (creepy Black Dude) gets iced. Ben talks Locke out of killing himself only to kill him anyway. Locke's move has saved the timewandering group, who ends up getting buddy-buddy with Dharma. The 316 wash up 3 years after the wandering group has entrenched their postions with Dharma. Sawyer finagles the returning group into Dharma, except Sayid who gets captured. That was four hours worth of mostly crap you already knew and flashbacks to those points. Outside of Ben killing Locke, it was a total YAWN. Episode 10 - Redeemer episode #2 - We get to see the young Ben Linus interacting with Sayid. We get to see what a jackass Ben's father is. In an ironic twist, Sayid is the one getting tortured, but when he tells the actual truth, it's so outlandish nobody believes it. Dharma actually votes to kill Sayid (and I thought they were hippies). We get the flaming Dharma van crashing into houses. Ben escapes with Sayid, and Sayid actually shoots the little fucker in the chest. All in all, it was really good and probably the second best of the season. Numbers jump up again next week. Episode 11 - aka "The Worst episode of the season" - Kate and Juliet work to give Ben to the others so he can be saved. That was it. The numbers TANKED after this epsiode dropping over 2.8M or 25% because of this bomb. Episodes 12-13 - Imo, they were pretty good. Ben gets judged by the monster, we find out there's this "shadow of the statue" faction running around, Miles has daddy issues and actually gets to meet his father. There's lots of focus on Ben, which is always a good thing considering he's one of the more interesting characters. Also, Locke actually gets cooler as these go on. Oh and we get to see Desmond beat the everyloving shit out of Ben, and also Ben unloading a shotgun for no reason on Caesar. There are a lot of classic moments here, but the fact remains that most of the numbers left the building after the show redeemed itself twice and then failed to deliver yet again the next week. The pacing is just really really shitty right now on LOST and it's hard to keep the audience consistently involved. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 27, 2009, 07:45:35 AM Other than the ratings numbers, I disagree with what you said.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 27, 2009, 07:59:16 AM Ditto
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2009, 09:20:11 AM It's fine that yall believe the shows were good. That's totally subjective. What isn't subjective is that people obviously didn't respond to episodes where very little happened in terms of action or reveals. The middle episodes drove the numbers down slowly, they popped back up briefly, and then they totally tanked.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 27, 2009, 09:24:06 AM Which is why I made the specific exception for your numbers. I think those shows were very good, but most people wouldn't know good shit if it was Cleveland Steamered on their chests.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2009, 09:33:45 AM You can't force people to like something. To be frank, I thought the shows in the middle were slow. They weren't "bad" they were just slow. The problem is that when you are already at half your original viewership over 5 seasons, and the main complaint in the past was that the show was slow, well...
That Place is Death. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 27, 2009, 12:44:35 PM I stopped giving any care about viewership numbers in relation to quality a long time ago. There are many many great things that get horrible ratings (and visa versa). Its a complete non factor to me now.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 27, 2009, 02:19:24 PM I stopped giving any care about viewership numbers in relation to quality a long time ago. There are many many great things that get horrible ratings (and visa versa). Its a complete non factor to me now. It's especially a non-factor when this show is going to get another complete season regardless of what happens with the ratings this season and that is the season that is going to wrap everything up. I honestly don't care about the ratings when it comes to this show because it has zero effect on me or the show itself. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 27, 2009, 02:29:12 PM I stopped giving any care about viewership numbers in relation to quality a long time ago. There are many many great things that get horrible ratings (and visa versa). Its a complete non factor to me now. It's especially a non-factor when this show is going to get another complete season regardless of what happens with the ratings this season and that is the season that is going to wrap everything up. My only concern would be if the ratings are so bad somehow the network could cancel it anyway. I have to admit to being completely puzzled as to the poor ratings given that the whole season has been utterly fantastic, in my opinion. I've enjoyed every episode. Nothing anywhere near polar bear cage levels of suckitude ^^ Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 27, 2009, 02:40:42 PM My only concern would be if the ratings are so bad somehow the network could cancel it anyway. I have to admit to being completely puzzled as to the poor ratings given that the whole season has been utterly fantastic, in my opinion. I've enjoyed every episode. Nothing anywhere near polar bear cage levels of suckitude ^^ Brian That's true. That would be a concern, but considering the poor ratings for ABC shows in general, save Dancing with the Stars, I can't see them cancelling it unless it just goes completely in the toilet. Oh and you are correct about the polar bear cage suckitude. I got some enjoyment out of Sawyer figuring out how to get a fish biscuit, but that was about it out of that whole few episodes. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 27, 2009, 03:30:49 PM Oh and you are correct about the polar bear cage suckitude. I got some enjoyment out of Sawyer figuring out how to get a fish biscuit, but that was about it out of that whole few episodes. I forgot about that. The fish biscuit thing was actually funny. But otherwise those early season three episodes represented the low point of the series for me. Thankfully they redeemed themselves. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 27, 2009, 04:53:25 PM I'm still waiting for the worst case -- they get canceled early and need to solve everything double-time. And finish with an ending like the final (goofball) episode of The Prisoner. That I would not like (regardless of my enjoyment of the rest of that series).
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on April 27, 2009, 05:27:23 PM I stopped giving any care about viewership numbers in relation to quality a long time ago. There are many many great things that get horrible ratings (and visa versa). Its a complete non factor to me now. Viewership numbers are important when compared to production costs, whether you care about popularity or not. I roll my eyes every time a quirky high production genre show is launched. It's got failure stamped on it, because it's only interesting to a minor subsection of the audience that will never provide the numbers to keep the show on the air. The problem with Lost, as Paelos well illustrated, is it jumped straight into a weird time travel story arc, with little consistent episode to episode payoff, while paying short shrift to the drama and character interaction stuff that put the asses in the seats of people that normally wouldn't watch a scifi/fantasy program. Drop in viewership plus high production costs means trouble. Quality is mostly subjective, as well. Compare shows like House, Rescue Me, Firefly, and Seinfeld. All of these have been lauded in general as having especially high quality (at least in their prime). And more likely than not, as individuals, we find that we might not particularly like one or more of them. That doesn't mean your taste sucks. It just means you have different tastes. I enjoy Rescue Me, but couldn't really get into Mad Men. I just find that I like my flawed, self-centered characters (with some redeeming qualities) to self-destruct in a more quickly paced and entertaining manner. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on April 27, 2009, 05:50:06 PM Are you guys taking DVD sales into account?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2009, 06:32:59 PM The only reason I bring up the numbers is that it won't stop them from doing a 6th season, but if the trend they are taking continues it could force them to abbreviate Season 6. That would suck, maybe. Or it could be awesome and make them actually move things forward quickly.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on April 27, 2009, 07:09:19 PM I believe they have contractually locked in the number of episodes left. If it truly tanks, ABC could choose not to air them, but I am fairly confident that all of the episodes have been funded and will be produced so they would be seen eventually. I think Lost does well with a coveted demographic and DVD sales/rentals are good so I'm not all that worried about it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2009, 07:10:12 PM Well that's something then. In the meantime, bring on more monster!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on April 29, 2009, 06:32:28 PM HOLY.
SHIT. :ye_gods: :ye_gods: :ye_gods: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on April 29, 2009, 06:55:25 PM Fuuuuuuuuuuuuck.
And damnit. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 29, 2009, 11:10:40 PM That was spectacular. And sad. Argh. Also, it was all Kate's fault.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evildrider on April 30, 2009, 12:46:52 AM $@#@*!*#^$@!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on April 30, 2009, 04:55:56 AM Anyways, when all it's said and done, it looks like Daniel failed in his attempt to change the course of events: if Jack, Sawyer & Co. will try and eventually succeed in leaving 1977, they will leave the Dharma initiative behind, and whatever happened after 1977 (Purge etc.) will still happen.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on April 30, 2009, 12:59:17 PM Anyways, when all it's said and done, it looks like Daniel failed in his attempt to change the course of events: if Jack, Sawyer & Co. will try and eventually succeed in leaving 1977, they will leave the Dharma initiative behind, and whatever happened after 1977 (Purge etc.) will still happen. Or maybe he was doing all of that to make sure the event happened. And by telling everyone the opposite, he ensures they go and do what they are supposed to do to make it happen. :uhrr: Time travel logic always hurts. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on April 30, 2009, 01:06:45 PM I hope the Island gives him a rez :heartbreak:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 30, 2009, 01:09:09 PM I hope the Island gives him a rez :heartbreak: That was my thought as well. The island has shown an amazing ability to keep people alive for as long as it needs them to be alive, even when they aren't on the island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 30, 2009, 05:15:00 PM It would make Eloise's sending him to the island much more palatable, that's for sure. Because if she knew he was going to die and that the island wasn't going to rez him, that's just all kinds of fucked up.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 30, 2009, 06:12:14 PM Considering her talk with Charles, she seemed pretty damn certain he died. So if he does get a res, its going to have to be without her knowledge.
I do however think, regardless of him living or not, they will change the future somehow. They had Faraday setup the fact that it was possible for them to change things, and I think that was put in place to foreshadow/justify whats coming up. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 30, 2009, 09:53:43 PM On the other hand, her pushing Dan so hard on his research and sending the O6 back may be her attempt to change the past and somehow save him from his fate. Of course, assuming she originally got his journal when he died in '77, she doesn't know what happens from here on -- if her attempt worked or if she doomed him to die at her hand again. Perhaps Jack will save him.
Ben looked like he was damn unlikely to survive when Sayid shot him -- so you never know, maybe they didn't really kill Faraday... though this may just be wishful thinking on my part. Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 01, 2009, 09:57:12 AM I don't buy Dan's explanation that the past can't be changed but the future can. From what the show has demonstrated so far, the past, present and future are all immutable and exist simultaneously. The future is simply the past that hasn't happened yet. The only way Dan's theory pans out is if a whole new branch in the timeline happens and then exists parallel to the original future. It'll be interesting to see how the writers work this one out.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 02, 2009, 10:00:22 PM He made his mother shoot him. There was absolutely no reason for him to demand a gun for a negotiation. He was always planning for it to happen.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on May 02, 2009, 11:49:32 PM He made his mother shoot him. There was absolutely no reason for him to demand a gun for a negotiation. He was always planning for it to happen. Great call. Makes perfect sense. He got Dharma riled up by talking to the Asian doctor. He got the time travellers riled up, and brought Jack and Kate to the Others. He then got the Others riled up. The only way it works is if Dan believes that the past can't be changed, but he knows that he has a part to play to set up the events. If he honestly wanted to stop things, he wouldn't have half-assed the attempt to dissuade Miles father and he wouldn't have walked right into the Others camp and held their leader at gunpoint (especially considering that he never really used guns before, and he commented that he didn't like guns at the locker). The mindscrew is that everyone will act as if the Incident could be prevented, and then find out that Dan set them up to make the incident happen. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 03, 2009, 06:40:57 AM Nor would he have used Kate and Sawyer to get into the Others camp, and then told them to remain behind while he goes wildly shooting into the middle of gun-toting outlaws. If you're going that route, you want obvious gun-toting backup in there with you as well.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 06, 2009, 11:10:48 PM Holy mother of moses, that was good TV! :awesome_for_real:
My jaw hit the floor when Locke said his intention was to kill Jacob. I had always assumed up to this point that all the messages, the "purpose", and all that other island stuff was just Jacob communicating with him. I guess not? Unless Jacob wants to die? I think Ben's reaction basically summed mine up perfectly: (http://i43.tinypic.com/289llkh.gif) Oh and Locke just keeps reaffirming himself as my favorite character. The entire scene where he's telling Richard what to do when he sees a man with a bullet wound to his leg show up at the plane? Just...awesome. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 07, 2009, 03:19:01 AM Holy mother of moses, that was good TV! :awesome_for_real: My jaw hit the floor when Locke said his intention was to kill Jacob. I had always assumed up to this point that all the messages, the "purpose", and all that other island stuff was just Jacob communicating with him. I guess not? Unless Jacob wants to die? I think Ben's reaction basically summed mine up perfectly I think for the first time we have now seen Ben really, seriously, completely at a loss for words. Helluva episode. Was hoping for a bit more Richard Alpert backstory, but still great stuff. Locke sending Richard to meet him... Dr Chang interrogating Hurley ("Who's the president?" "Okay dude, we're from the future.")... all kinds of fun. I'm still kinda hoping that Whatever Happened Happened and Jack and Co are being setup to ensure that everything remains in motion as before. I don't think there's been a single instance of the past being successfully derailed and in a way will be disappointed if it turns out it can be. Of course, if WHH, I'm not sure how it all fits back together. Next week ought to be fun. I'm sure it'll end with some insane twist that will setup some entirely new arc for season six and the endgame -- hopefully it'll be on par with the previous season finales. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 07, 2009, 04:03:41 AM Goddamn that was awesome.
They said 'starting at 8' for next week, but I just checked the listings to see if it was a 2 hour episode. The 8:00 show is another clip sum-up for those who have missed episodes, the finale is at 9:00 as usual. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 07, 2009, 05:19:52 AM Goddamn that was awesome. They said 'starting at 8' for next week, but I just checked the listings to see if it was a 2 hour episode. The 8:00 show is another clip sum-up for those who have missed episodes, the finale is at 9:00 as usual. Yes. So, in total, there's going to be 3 hours of Lost. That's a good night of TV right there. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 07, 2009, 05:21:43 AM They can't change anything in the past, I thought Dan getting killed by mummy (shortly after saying they could) was a fairly major clue that he was wrong.
Edit - But I was wrong about something similar in TSCC so *shrug* Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 07, 2009, 07:15:57 AM I'm going to go with the "nothing changes" theory. Exploding the bomb seems much more likely to cause The Incident than to prevent it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on May 07, 2009, 07:34:10 AM The entire scene where he's telling Richard what to do when he sees a man with a bullet wound to his leg show up at the plane? Just...awesome. That scene was poorly staged. Otherwise a good show. This whole nuke thing seems half bake. It's hard to image how they are going to pull this off in a reasonable manor. I look forward to be proven wrong.It's a total conceit where the writers set up coincidences and inside knowledge so that one character can be a badass as he pwns everyone else. But the way Lost has built up, it works well here. It's like Locke is a surrogate for the viewer and *we* are finally getting some payback after these characters jerked us around for so long. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 07, 2009, 07:55:42 AM Splendid episode. I look forward to Jack trying to set us up the bomb while EVERYBODY fucks with him.
Who wants to bet that the tremendous electromagnetic energy contained in the Hatch was a hydrogen bomb being exploded and captured in a temporal field (time warp) at the exact moment of explosion so that the bomb doesn't go off? Thus ensuring that if Jack succeeds in setting off the bomb, it dooms them to crash on the island in 30 years? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 07, 2009, 10:16:21 AM Good episode, and one that makes me hate Kate even more if that's possible. I wish Juliet would just punch her in the face already. Hurley admitting he doesn't know anything about the 70s was really funny, as was Locke's smirking ass the entire show while Ben is grasping at any sort of foothold on the situation.
As for the incident, I bet they fuck over Jack and try to get rid of the bomb by detonating it right as the island skips through time via the wheel. The explosion occurs in empty space left by the bomb, and everyone else gets shot off into a different time period. Here's the kicker: we know most of the Dharma folk live through the incident, only to be gassed later on by an older Ben. I think they island actually takes the Dharma folks into the future, and that's how they are going to try to unite all the Losties across time periods. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 07, 2009, 01:47:25 PM I bet Jacob is either the remains of the Set statue or the poltergeist-like thing we saw in Horace's cabin way back when. Conjecture: Jacob is an evil spirit haunting the island (smoke?), and the "island" needs Locke to remove it. And then all will be well.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on May 07, 2009, 02:13:43 PM I'm throwing my lot in with the Whatever Happened, Happened crowd in that the past cannot be changed. I think the show is obviously setting up for that to be the case, with perhaps the small exception of Desmond.
Locke, for me, is currently bordering the fine line between unbelievable awesomeness and immeasurable smugness. He does that wide smile with the closed eyes and all I can think of is a Cheshire Cat Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on May 07, 2009, 02:46:24 PM Jacob is what lies in the shadow of the statue.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on May 07, 2009, 04:20:47 PM Hurley's girlfriend gave Desmond the boat so he would end up on the island, and then watched over Hurley in the mental institution to keep an eye on him to ensure he made it to the island. Eloise guided her son's life to make sure he did what he was needed to do. It's not coincidence that they wound up on the island, and it's not simple fate.
Since stopping The Incident would work against all the effort put into bringing them to the island, it won't happen. They were brought there for some purpose, but this ain't it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 07, 2009, 05:01:02 PM I bet Jacob is either the remains of the Set statue or the poltergeist-like thing we saw in Horace's cabin way back when. Conjecture: Jacob is an evil spirit haunting the island (smoke?), and the "island" needs Locke to remove it. And then all will be well. I'm not sure what Jacob is, but if the writers have any sense of names (and given many of their choices, I believe they do) Jacob means "Supplanter". If they run with that meaning, Jacob is not supposed to be in charge of the island. Instead, he stole it and the other force on the island is seeking to regain control. The flip-side it could be JJ Abrams (middle J is Jacob) tossing it out there in the ultimate version of egotistic puppetmaster. Personally, I think Jacob and Richard could both be gods, or the two different facets of the same god. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 13, 2009, 07:25:31 PM Oh well goddamnit.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 07:25:54 PM Wow, what a gigantic fuck you that entire episode was. Outside of actually seeing Jacob which was pretty funny as he came off as the gigantic Darth Sidious puppetmaster.
EDIT: Also I totally knew what was in the box well before it came out. Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on May 13, 2009, 07:28:44 PM oh
my god Equal parts :awesome_for_real: and :ye_gods: Fuck that ending. Forever. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 07:30:14 PM The funny part is the premiere will explain nothing, and they'll dick us over for another 8 episodes.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on May 13, 2009, 07:32:24 PM I figured out what was in the trunk a few minutes after they opened it the first time.
Aside from the cliffhanger, the biggest surprise was them finally revealing the bad guy. 5 seasons before they get back to things they hinted at in the first episode is a long time. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 13, 2009, 07:39:04 PM Yeah the box was predictable, but the ending.. goddamnit.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 13, 2009, 07:40:53 PM Y'know, this show is just about the silliest thing on network TV but I think I finally nailed why I like it: It's Myst in soap opera form. And I hated Myst so go figure why I love this show this much (well, there's less pointing and clicking at any rate). Tonight's episode fucked my brain hard and I need a cerebral cigarette now. Or at least a towel to clean my frontal lobe off.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 07:46:33 PM From beginning to end, there is some reason why Jacob's enemy can't kill him, even though he says he wants to. This has an endgame in time that they are both fighting for, and Jacob was in control of that timeline. This speaks highly to the usurper title assumed by Jacob's name.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 13, 2009, 08:02:35 PM I'm confused as to whether Locke is actually any part Locke anymore or if that was all Jacob's counterpart.
And why would Jacob go through all the trouble of manipulating everyone at various points in their life (including bringing Locke back to life after he fell from a window) to get them to that time period? He obviously knows what's coming, but that means he wanted to die? Or maybe he just flat didn't see Ben in the equation? Oh me. What an episode. My brain seriously fucking hurts though. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 08:13:45 PM Jacob's obviously an even larger and crazier version of Ben.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 13, 2009, 08:32:16 PM Jacob is not a manipulator. He is the embodiment of free will. They all made choices that put them on that island. The loophole was that someone else had to choose to kill him of his own free will. The other dude will turn out to be the embodiment of determinism and the manipulator (how he set up Ben with the whole "you must obey Locke who just happens to be me").
The whole show is organized around fate/destiny vs. choice/free will. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 09:02:31 PM That sort of breaks down when he rezzes Locke for no reason, pulls Kate's feet out of the fire when she's stealing, and essentially lets Sayid's wife get creamed by a car. Granted with Hurley and Ben it was about choice, but if wanted to save himself he wouldn't have given him the "What about you?" line. Even with Hurley, he would have walked away from the Island and hid if it wasn't for Jacob showing up. He's taking choices away from people in most instances I saw. He's forcing the future. From the early part I'm gathering that he's playing blocker to the other guy. I think it's these two Titans locked in a battle for the future of humanity, and there may not be a "good" guy in any of this.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on May 13, 2009, 09:03:57 PM I'm not so sure that was Jacob. As far as we know, Jacob has been trapped on the island and in the cabin up until Locke first broke the circle of ash.
On the other side, we have a shape-changing manipulator (currently) wearing the skin of Locke. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 09:05:21 PM They are both manipulators. There's not going to be a white knight here.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 13, 2009, 09:14:23 PM I disagree on the no choices issue but it's a matter of interpretation.
They both seemed pretty scared at who was "coming" so I don't think they are the ultimate powers. Whoever has been "using" the cabin, i.e. whoever is in Jack's Dad's body, and whoever the "who lies in the shadow" people represent have both yet to be revealed. Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on May 13, 2009, 09:19:44 PM I assumed he meant that the people stuck 30 years in the past were coming. By all accounts, they very much are.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 09:21:41 PM There could be a higher layer of bad guys, I agree. I just think Sawyer's lines about destiny are the authors filling us in. We don't speak destiny here, people do things because they want something, and that's what the two superpowers here are fighting for.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 13, 2009, 09:25:50 PM But then he let Jack do his thing anyways. It's a continuation of the rationality v. faith tension that has been at the heart of the series since the second episode or so that was more explicit in the first three seasons with Jack (rational) v. Locke (faith).
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 09:31:41 PM I'm not disagreeing with you about the theme. I think that's been the undertone of the series from the getgo as you've said.
What I am saying is that they are bad. Both of them. They are slaves to either side of thinking and that's gone too far. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 13, 2009, 09:52:33 PM Could be. The title of that O'Connor book Jacob was reading (in my favorite scene of the whole episode) is based upon a work of Pierre Teilhard De Chardin who was a Jesuit priest who tried to combine both faith and rationality and was a major proponent of directed evolution.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 13, 2009, 09:59:10 PM Yes, the book scene was pretty epic. The timing was without a doubt the best part of the show. I just know they are fucking with their audience at this point, and they keep adding layers to the battles of the destiny v. free will. First it was Jack and Locke, then it was Widmore and Ben, now it's Jacob and this dude.
Who's the last man behind the curtain? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nevermore on May 13, 2009, 10:54:54 PM I caught on pretty early on that 'Locke' wasn't Locke. As soon as he told Ben that he would be the one to kill Jacob, it was very obvious that 'Locke' was the mystery antagonist.
What I'm most curious about is how much of the symbolism is calculated and how much is just thrown out there. The statue was of Sobek, an Egyptian crocodile god, but as far as I remember he isn't the god of anything in particular other than crocodiles. He is considered a 'righter of wrongs' and enemy of evil, which is why he depicted with the ankh, but he's not necessarily 'good'. Jacob weaving at the beginning set off all kinds of warning bells as that's a classic depiction of the weaver at the loom of time, although that could make him a creator, caretaker or manipulator. I wonder if the writers will take a page from Neil Gaiman and it turns out Jacob and the antagonist are what's left of two old gods. On another note, was that supposed to be the Black Rock at the beginning of the episode? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 13, 2009, 11:09:35 PM I'm with Abagadro on this. I also am curious about Claire and Christian at the end of s4. Could be Jacob and other dude are both trapped and there is a third and evil wheel (smoke). All this this Set /Osiris stuff is interesting (both gods of the dead).
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 13, 2009, 11:46:04 PM I've been thinking even more about this episode and just how tragic it is that Locke wasn't actually special at all. His entire life has been one tragedy after another and the character was one that I was really pulling for to have some sort of greater role or meaning. It appears that he'll end up just like he always ended up in the past, a failure.
It's actually pretty damn :heartbreak: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 14, 2009, 12:37:50 AM The writers are total bastards. I enjoyed it a lot. But they are still total bastards.
They actually managed to make me feel bad for Ben too. Even though I've always been a bit sympathetic to that lying manipulative bastard ^^ Looking forward to see if they have some suitable epic way to tie this up now. Hoping we get some Jacob backstory in S6. Glad that they haven't killed Ben off yet. Maybe he gets a redemption arc after all. Or maybe they're just fucking with us. Also, if Locke isn't Locke: 1. Did smokey and the ghost of Alex know? 2. Is Ben still bound to obey "Locke"? 3. Bloody hell! Any bets as to if they'd go so far as to open up on flight 815 pre-crash in S6E1.... that'd really make my head hurt. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Xerapis on May 14, 2009, 02:39:17 AM My favorite line of the evening?
"I'm a Pisces" Not sure exactly why, but it made me laugh my ass off. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on May 14, 2009, 04:04:20 AM Ghost Alex - and every other dead person on the island, including Christian - were all Jacob's enemy.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 14, 2009, 07:55:48 AM I thought that was pretty terrible, the pistol shoot out scene even had a guy fall onto sand, I had an A-Team flashback. Jacob at the end can't say "Hey Ben, just a minor detail but that's not really Locke, it just looks like him", probably against the rules or something.
So everybody is a chess piece, Gods or Aliens, I'm going with Aliens. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on May 14, 2009, 08:32:45 AM I disagree that the loophole is Ben using Free Will to kill Jacob. Ben is the determinism poster child. Ruled by his insecurities, he doesn't have an enlightened bone in his body. His motivation for killing Jacob was revenge and self-preservation. Even when he finally committed the act it a lashing out because his feelings were hurt rather than deliberate act. The loophole wasn't Ben's Free Will but Ben's Psychosis. Jacob had little regard for Ben because Ben's nature is anti-antithetical to Jacob's.
I feel like I want choose sides, but does look like battle of abstractions. When the number 3 goes to war against the color Orange, how can you choose sides. It does seem that island still independent of Jacob and Anti-jacob. Although I am not sure Anti-jacob rule will be any worse than Jacob's. One possibility is this resets board. Ben would be back in charge of the Other's(although fragmented a bit). Jacob's Chosen will battle them because ideology conflict will continue. Maybe it's island wishes to be free of the Demigods. Or maybe Kate, Jack, Sawyer, Sayid, Jin, Sun and Hurley represent a new paradigm to take their place. Of course if they fail, Ben could be the new paradigm. :ye_gods: Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on May 14, 2009, 08:58:00 AM Anyone else get the impression that Jacob was goading Ben on to kill him. I mean, he could've said a lot of things that weren't "What about you? ::raised eyebrow::".
I can totally see Ben being the primary star of the last season. He's already stolen the show. Everyone else imo is secondary. Gods, free will, determinism. You all might be overthinking it. It could be as simple as a group of ancient people managed someone to get to the island. Noticed awesome properties. Lived there. Eventually died. For thousands of years, the last 2 were at odds. Eventually, you grow to hate the other guy. They've been there long enough to maybe figure out a few things about the island, and time, and life, and Not-Jacob decided he's tired of sitting around and wants something, anything, to change, and went about doing it by killing Jacob. And Jacob counter'd him with some grand plan about throwing some variables into Not-Jacob's plans (oceanic's). Or something. Dunno, I got a bit weepy when Juliet went crashing. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 14, 2009, 10:12:10 AM So who is "dead" now?
s5 Juliet Daniel Sayid (fuk) Locke (fawk!) Charlotte s4 Charlie Claire (I guess) Michael Walt (sort of) fill in rest Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 14, 2009, 10:14:58 AM Ghost Alex - and every other dead person on the island, including Christian - were all Jacob's enemy. yeah agreed Also, did everyone notice that for every character Jacob met at whatever age he touched them? Even handing Sawyer the pen? Just sayin -- he didnt just engineer stuff, he had to mark who would be on the island, as it were. Even bringing John back from the dead. Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on May 14, 2009, 10:19:53 AM He got his immortal stank all over them, giving them time-changing variable powers.
At first, I thought, he was engaging in a small activity that would help them become who they were but that seems someone specious. Kate may not have been a bad-ass biddy all her life if she hadn't gotten bailed out just then. But Sawyer definitely would have written that note, just with another pen, and Sun & Jin would still love each other tenderly. But I really do think it was the touch. Either marking them, making them special, or who knows. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nevermore on May 14, 2009, 10:23:08 AM Anyone else get the impression that Jacob was goading Ben on to kill him. I mean, he could've said a lot of things that weren't "What about you? ::raised eyebrow::". I can totally see Ben being the primary star of the last season. He's already stolen the show. Everyone else imo is secondary. Gods, free will, determinism. You all might be overthinking it. It could be as simple as a group of ancient people managed someone to get to the island. Noticed awesome properties. Lived there. Eventually died. For thousands of years, the last 2 were at odds. Eventually, you grow to hate the other guy. They've been there long enough to maybe figure out a few things about the island, and time, and life, and Not-Jacob decided he's tired of sitting around and wants something, anything, to change, and went about doing it by killing Jacob. And Jacob counter'd him with some grand plan about throwing some variables into Not-Jacob's plans (oceanic's). Or something. Dunno, I got a bit weepy when Juliet went crashing. If I'm remembering the opening sequence correctly, if anything the antagonist is upset because of a loss of the status quo since it appears Jacob did something to allow that ship (which I still think is the Black Rock and who's crew is probably the original 'others') to approach the island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Special J on May 14, 2009, 10:31:09 AM Godamn, that was :uhrr:. But in a good way. Had a four hour marathon watching the two episodes leading up to the finale. I missed the first 3-4 minutes I was confused about Jacob's enemy and the 'loophole'. Reading a synopsis its a little more clear. I'll be going crazy waiting for s6.
I have to assume history hasn't changed and "whatever happened..." but I can't put it past the writers to fuck with me even more. The only thing that annoyed the ever living shit out of me in this one was how many times people changed their minds about Jack's plan. Just seemed like it was all there to drag it out to two hours. In case you didn't look it up, according to Lostpedia: Richard Alpert responded to the question of "What lies in the shadow of the statue?" with "Ille qui nos omnes servabit" - “He who will protect/save us all.” Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 14, 2009, 11:10:44 AM Locke is the guy who sat with Jacob at the end. He is the trickster, the devil, while Jacob is God.
The entire show is quite obviously a 6-season homage to the battle episodes between the Devil and Mr. Roarke on Fantasy Island. Also, my first words after the screen went white at the end? Motherfuckers. 2010 is SO LONG. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 14, 2009, 11:21:45 AM So the answer to "What lies in the shadow of the statue" was "He who will save us all" in Latin. The authors are trying to obviously set Jacob up as some kind of hero. In the beginning, he's wearing white, his rival wears black. His rival wants to kill him, and he seems indifferent. The scene is open to a lot of interpretations, but it breaks down like this:
Jacob's rival is there because of the ship, which Jacob arranged to show up. We assume it's the Black Rock. Jacob's rival says Jacob is still trying to prove him wrong. "They come, they fight, they destroy, and they corrupt, and it always ends the same." Jacob says, "It only ends once, anything else that happens before that is progress." I assume Jacob's rival wants to get rid of humanity in this scene. It's obviously not the first time that humans have shown up on the island, and they both know how it's gone in the past because they are immortals. It also seems that Jacob is fighting against the time loop here. The rival seems to believe in the inevitable outcome, while Jacob is trying to shift it off that outcome. I think the Biblical connections between Jacob and his brother Esau are being heavily used by the writers to create this rivalry. I also think that the statue is Sobek, who was a rather ambiguous god in terms of good/evil. This plays into my theory that there are no good guys here at the top. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 14, 2009, 12:05:30 PM Isn't there a whole thing about having real difficulty giving birth on the island? If Esau (might as well call him that for now) doesn't want people on the island he might have something to do with that. Also if Jacob has to be involved to get you to the island, does that mean Esau brought the army just to get the atom bomb? Jacob's followers killed the army personnel but let Daniel guide them to bury the bomb, not Jacob.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 22, 2009, 02:33:15 PM In an interview with Terry O'Quinn:
Quote As for his character, O’Quinn says he’s really gone. Locke’s dead body was rolled out of a metal box toward the end of the two-hour episode, baffling islanders who had been following a Locke imposter. Exactly who is now occupying Locke’s body wasn’t revealed. O’Quinn said it would be “a good guess” to assume it’s a man seen with the infamous Jacob in the beginning of the episode. “I think, unfortunately, I think it’s ended for Locke. But I’m still there, as far as I know,” O’Quinn said. “I don’t know how it’s going to end for this other guy. I’m sad. I miss John Locke, poor guy. He was a pawn.” O’Quinn is gearing up to play a new character when the sixth season begins next year. As for the rest of the story line, he swears he has no idea. “Your guess is honestly as good as mine is,” he said. “There’s going to be some confrontation that will somehow, I’m guessing, have to do with Jack or Locke or something like that. I think these guys are just setting up good and evil. It’s the way Locke said in the very beginning of the show: One is light and one is dark. Two sides. I think that’s what we’ve got.” Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cadaverine on May 22, 2009, 03:24:03 PM Is the the 6th season going to be the last? I watched it here and there at first, but I'm horribad at keeping up w/ tv shows, so I eventually gave up. Once it's all said and done, though, I'd like to sit down, and watch it all on dvd when time permits.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 22, 2009, 03:29:26 PM 6th is last season yes.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on August 31, 2009, 06:50:25 AM I kinda necro the thread because I just finished watching Seasons 1 to 5 back to back.
I am a bit lost for words actually. The whole experience has been really awesome and it is one of the most brilliant shows I have watched in years. It had its share of misses and plotlines that fizzled out or simply didn't work. The best thing they have done however is reducing the episode orders from 24 to 17 and fixing an end date. The ratio of awesome to mediocre episodes really tipped towards better quality after that. I start with the bad: This whole Jack, Sawyer, Kate love triangle needs to stop asap. That alone is responsible for nearly all of the stupid and inane plots of the last 5 seasons. Ice Bear Cages. Depressed Emo Jack. Stubborn emo Jack. With the addition of Juliette to the cast it went on to a whole new dimension of stupid by adding her to the now quadrangle of bad plots and Jack being a stupid douche. This ultimately led to the stupid plot of "I need to jump down into this hole full of electromagnetism because Sawyer looked funny at Kate" and the demise of Juliette which I am still totally furious about. Seriously Kate needs to go and somebody needs to write Jack's character in a different way because right now he is a totally irresponsible douche. On second thought both need to go, they both serve no purpose at all any more. Kate and Jack are by far my most hated characters on the show. They are solely used by the writers as devices for stupidly advancing the plot in certain directions. It's a bad case of plot driven development in which case the characters act all kinds of stupid because the story needs to move in a certain direction. As Sawyer said in "Namaste". He thinks problems through because Jack's approach of just reacting usually leads to people dying If they wanted to keep the angle of "Rationality" vs. "Faith" they should have stuck with Locke vs. Eko. Also they have a lot of far better actors and better designed characters to choose from anyway. The good: For a network TV show the story is extremely well crafted. For a show where a lot of the plot each season is basically made up as they go along (Even if they have a plot outline they never know for certain if they aren't cancelled, if certain actors are or keep available etc.) it has only a few plot holes and unconnected threads. The characters - with the exception of Jack and Kate - are usually well written and multi dimensional although they sometimes go a bit overboard with the back story and the coincidences. It also has a good ratio of drama and mystery and they keep resolving some things which is at least some payoff and helps them prevent the X-fileization of the plot. I especially like that they don't hang on to cast members or keep adding new ones if they prove to be good. Adding Desmond, Miles, Ben, Richard and Juliette to the cast were good moves as were killing off a few of the more unnecessary ones. It keeps the story fresh. However it is sometimes sad that really good characters get killed of too soon (at least in my opinion). Faraday for example. I am really looking forward to Season 6 although they seem to divert from the "whatever happened happened". The comicon teasers - if they are any indication of season 6 - seem to suggest that they did change the future by creating the incident. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on August 31, 2009, 09:16:51 AM I was okay with the love story as a gimmick increase the the show's appeal to women until the end of s5. The Juliet character went off the deep end. Which is disappointing because I liked her more than Kate. It also makes more sense to me that Juliet would ditch Sawyer with the return of Jack then become proactively jealous of Kate.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on August 31, 2009, 04:16:16 PM I found Jack to extremely douchey at points during the series, but I thought that once he was actually doing something other than being a douche, like attempting to advance the plot towards the end of season 5, I started liking him again.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on August 31, 2009, 09:36:27 PM Like Jerry Maguire, I like the man that Jack almost is. One of my favorite episodes in the series is the one that reveals the origin and meaning of Jack's tattoo. Turning to the smug, condescending Sheriff and saying, "That's what it says - not what it means" was a great :drill: moment.
Unfortunately, that episode had me looking forward to the fulfillment of Jack's "destiny" as being a great leader who is saddened and angered by the separation being a leader causes. Well, he's managed to nail the emo/angry bits alright. Still waiting on the "great leader" part. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on September 01, 2009, 02:58:11 PM I like how Jack is ultimately flawed as a person, with very evident weaknesses. And I also liked him a lot during the first two season...Then, yeah, Carlton and Cuse focused too much on the triangle or whatever. Both authors also hinted that they wanted to create a nice contraposition between Locke and Eko, to be further explored in season three and possibly beyond, but the actor portraying Mr. Eko simply couldn't stand staying in Hawaii for such long periods of time, and simply asked to be written off, or something like that.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on September 01, 2009, 09:30:02 PM Jack's character hasn't been cool in 3 seasons. Kate's character has completely stopped making any sense.
I want Claire back, I want Eko back, I want Daniel back, I want the real Locke back, hell I'd even like to see what Boone would be like at this stage on the Island. The funny part is that the writers believe they've written a great leadership character in Jack. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on September 01, 2009, 09:53:10 PM Jack's character hasn't been cool in 3 seasons. Kate's character has completely stopped making any sense. I want Claire back, I want Eko back, I want Daniel back, I want the real Locke back, hell I'd even like to see what Boone would be like at this stage on the Island. The funny part is that the writers believe they've written a great leadership character in Jack. I don't think they think that at all. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on September 02, 2009, 09:17:01 AM What he said. Jack is in no way a great leadership character, nor is he portrayed to be. He's a reactionary - he just reacts, very rarely thinks and usually ends up fucking up. I mean, HE GOT WHAT HE WANTED (Kate in the real world) and he wasn't happy. He started boozing and pill-popping again, and totally fucked the whole relationship up. Didn't he even lose his medical license? He is a tragically self-destructive character whose only solace seems to be leading people on the island - but he fucks that up too, so he keeps trying to unfuck it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ashrik on September 02, 2009, 01:20:15 PM God, I can't stand Jack and Kate.
That moment when Jack turned to Sawyer(?) and told him he needed to go back and the root cause of everything was his love for Kate took his character from irrational reactionary leader to pure stupid town. All I could think of was "Her? What is she, funny or something?" She's been nothing but a weirdly neurotic somehow siren-like woman who's main response to most stimuli appears to be clamming up and running. :uhrr: gahhh Jack turning to her and saying "You didn't like the old me, Kate" was a triumph and a highpoint for his character. To the fellow who thought the tattoo episode was one of the best, I believe you to be nuts Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on September 03, 2009, 08:31:09 PM Jack turning to her and saying "You didn't like the old me, Kate" was a triumph and a highpoint for his character. To the fellow who thought the tattoo episode was one of the best, I believe you to be nuts In my defense, it wasn't because of all the weird shit with Bai Ling. I meant more that it was a favorite in terms of the development of his character. I stand by my declaration of the awesomeness of the burn he gave to the Sheriff. "You didn't like the old me, Kate" was another excellent one, I agree. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Gunzwei on September 06, 2009, 08:41:10 AM After hearing about this show for years I finally sat down this past week and watched seasons 1-5 straight through. Excellent show for the most part.
Kate needed to be written off in season 1/2 or better yet not included as a character to begin with. The romance arcs with her do not work at all. There's no sense of emotional investment with the character that you get with Sun/Jin, Charlie/Claire, Sawyer/Juliet, or Desmond/Penelope. Even Sayid and Shannon (which I read was a joke idea pitched by the actor playing Sayid) was more believable than Kate with anyone. Jack's character got mishandled and should have gone darker beyond season 2 which I thought was where the character was supposed to be heading by the whole "you should have listened and let us torture ben" ending. Again I'll put the blame for this on the love triangle fuckery. Aside from that minor complaint the rest of the cast has been excellent. The story has had a few patched holes here and there but otherwise it's been really good. The foreshadowing at times is beautifully done such as how the chain of manipulation with Locke's father being killed by Sawyer leads to how Ben is manipulated into killing Jacob. I'm guessing season 6 will start off, or at least get into ealry on, the origin of Jacob. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on November 19, 2009, 03:22:19 PM Lost returns on tuesday, February 2 at 9 with a two hour season premiere, regular timeslot for lost will be tuesdays at 9.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on November 19, 2009, 04:10:34 PM I want to hump your leg like a dog.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on November 20, 2009, 02:41:59 AM I want to hump your leg like a dog. You'd have to buy me dinner first Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on November 20, 2009, 05:50:00 AM Well, thanks for that, Jeff Kelly. I was actually just wondering if it was coming back or gone for good. I still have questions!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on November 20, 2009, 05:56:42 AM Well, thanks for that, Jeff Kelly. I was actually just wondering if it was coming back or gone for good. I still have questions! Last season though! Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on November 20, 2009, 07:13:05 AM I knew that it was ending soon but I was hoping they'd follow through and tie up some of the millions of loose ends. I'm sure they'll just let some slide due to the sheer number of plots they left lying around. Most would be nice, though.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on November 20, 2009, 07:15:24 AM I knew that it was ending soon but I was hoping they'd follow through and tie up some of the millions of loose ends. I'm sure they'll just let some slide due to the sheer number of plots they left lying around. Most would be nice, though. I think focusing on tying everything up is the plan. No more flash backs/forwards for this season too so they can just focus on the main stories. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ookii on November 20, 2009, 09:42:33 AM So do you think they slowly answer all of our questions throughout the season, or just in the last episode?
I think they come up with so many more questions that the finale episode is just a Q & A with all the characters. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on November 25, 2009, 01:34:37 PM Well, they actually did a decent job last season of tying off plots or revisit old ones with new info. They've set themselves up in a good position to answer most of the questions while still bringing up some new stuff for the last season. Hopefully they don't do the Battlestar thing and just run towards the last episode without bothering to tie many things up, then try to (poorly) do it all in the series final.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on January 07, 2010, 02:01:54 PM http://www.hulu.com/lost
Hulu has all 5 seasons up and streaming in 480p. Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on January 08, 2010, 06:53:48 AM So do you think they slowly answer all of our questions throughout the season, or just in the last episode? I think they come up with so many more questions that the finale episode is just a Q & A with all the characters. Not enough time for Q&A, i predict just pure scrolling text... will revolutionize series finales. :ye_gods: Seriously though, I don't believe they can "tie-off" all the dangling loops because they aren't writing the same story in 2010 that they started with in 2004. This is new TV... the plot is written in response to audience feedback via the internet; plot twists do not further the story towards a conclusion, they _are_ the story. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on January 08, 2010, 07:20:05 AM Me and the woman are rewatching the whole series (or as much as we can) until Lost comes back. Halfway through Season 1 now and I like picking up a lot of the little things along the way.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rendakor on January 08, 2010, 07:30:39 AM I just started rewatching as well, since my girlfriend has never seen it and wouldn't watch it til there was an end in sight.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on January 08, 2010, 08:28:12 AM I'll probably just read some summaries before season 6 starts to refresh me on things. Then I'll do the grand re-watch after I buy the entire series on BluRay once its out.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on January 08, 2010, 10:07:28 AM One thing we noticed is when Jack started seeing his father, 4-5 episodes , we thought we saw him not wearing any shoes. I don't know if that was significant at all. I do recall something about shoes last season, but wasn't it just jack taking something of his father's and put them on the plane to match the last time to get back to the island?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on January 08, 2010, 10:10:29 AM Heh, I just that this was released:
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41488/Lost-last-supper.jpg) Which of course reminded me of this: (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41488/BSG-last-supper.jpg) Guess all my favorite TV shows are destined to do a Last Supper promo for the final season. Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on January 08, 2010, 10:19:25 AM I'll probably just read some summaries before season 6 starts to refresh me on things. Then I'll do the grand re-watch after I buy the entire series on BluRay once its out. http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1927408That does a pretty good job. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rendakor on January 08, 2010, 10:32:26 AM That video actually sums it up really well.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on January 08, 2010, 11:00:11 AM Yeah it does.
Cool. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Gutboy Barrelhouse on January 08, 2010, 06:45:05 PM They really should market Darma beer, soda, chips. I would buy them if they tasted good.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 12, 2010, 10:15:15 AM Carlton Cuse today at the press tour: "to explain everything down to the last midichlorian would be a mistake."
Awesome. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on January 22, 2010, 02:25:34 AM I just finished watching the first five seasons. My synopsis. It's a great sci-fi/mystery/paranormal show that has horrid romance plots thrown in.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on January 22, 2010, 08:08:26 AM Bad CGI.
The one thing that bothered me is Libby. She was in the crazy house with Hurley and they never explained that. She died like 3-4 episodes after they showed her in that episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on January 22, 2010, 08:16:15 AM She had to leave the show for external reasons I think, so they had to just end her storyline. Maybe they'll revisit it, but I think thats just a dead end plot line they had to stop. Which is good, because I fucking hated that character and her attempted romance with Hurley (who IS an awesome character).
I don't think many of the romance plots are bad. Actually, I think the only one thats gotten annoying is the Jack/Kate/Sawyer triangle, but if they can resist bringing that back up again in the final season, should be fine. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 22, 2010, 08:20:38 AM Carlton Cuse has specifically said Libby is in this last season.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on January 22, 2010, 08:52:07 AM (http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y106/Seijuro_HikoXIII/Kujo_Jotaro/VB218.jpg)
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on January 22, 2010, 08:56:10 AM God, I loved that episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on January 24, 2010, 11:46:57 AM I don't think many of the romance plots are bad. Actually, I think the only one thats gotten annoying is the Jack/Kate/Sawyer triangle, but if they can resist bringing that back up again in the final season, should be fine. I fear with Juliet dead, we are in for a final season of more miserable jack/kate/sawyer triangle. I've got to watch the tail end of S5 again before S6 starts up, so I remember where exactly we are in all the craziness. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on January 24, 2010, 12:13:50 PM I keep wondering if that now they altered things with the bomb, if they don't actually land in LA instead of crashing on the island. But then I think, is there a story to develop there? Do they bring back all the characters that died? Do they all somehow remember each other and try to get back to the island again?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on January 24, 2010, 12:16:04 PM I don't think the bomb can't really reset anything as it was already built into the timeline. It is clearly the "incident" that has been referred to since Season 2.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on January 24, 2010, 02:27:48 PM I like the nuke to change things drasticaly just because that would be much more interesting than "It was meant to be."
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on January 24, 2010, 03:23:29 PM I don't think that it's "it was meant to be" so much as "it needs to be". People have a choice in it the matter, it's just that they choose/are manipulated into a course of events.
Ms. Hawking knew she was going to kill her son but sent him there anyway, because she thought it was important. Abaddon was sent to Locke to motivate him to get on the airplane, because Widmore thought it was important. Libby was seen in flashbacks for Michael, Hugo, and Desmond. She even gave Desmond the boat that gets him to the island. For whatever reason, she's manipulating events and watching over people to to ensure everyone gets to where they need to be. If it was pre-destined - like Charlie dying - the universe would have just found a way to get them all there, and it wouldn't have let 7 of them escape off. Who thinks they needs to be on the Island and why really seem like the questions. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on January 28, 2010, 08:46:25 AM I like this theory for the end of Lost...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY3QHjnn4SQ Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on January 30, 2010, 09:50:59 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on January 30, 2010, 11:49:56 AM I like this theory for the end of Lost... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY3QHjnn4SQ That's actually pretty awesome. If this were Heroes I'd follow that by saying "...and therefore will not happen." :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on January 30, 2010, 11:26:44 PM So, while watching the last few episodes of S5 (in the middle of Follow the Leader now), a thought crossed my mind.
(probably excessive to spoiler, but just in case) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Hawkbit on January 31, 2010, 05:37:48 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 01, 2010, 12:32:49 PM Almost finished with Season 3 rewatching. I really angry that I don't have much of season 5 fresh in my head. Hopefully I'll be able to remember most of it... I think I can.
The small details of the Locke/Jacob/Other Guy plot is fuzzy in my head. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rendakor on February 01, 2010, 02:10:09 PM I'm also doing a big rewatch, a few episodes into Season 4. Am I the only one who finds S4 the worst of the series?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 01, 2010, 02:55:44 PM 4 > 5 > 3 > 2 > 1
Hopefully Lost learned from Sopranos and BSG, so no ambiguous or magic-wand ending. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 01, 2010, 03:04:12 PM I'm also doing a big rewatch, a few episodes into Season 4. Am I the only one who finds S4 the worst of the series? I thought season 4 was excellent. I've enjoyed the show its whole run though. I'd say season 3 was the weakest as they were throwing out tons of filler. Once they got the ok to do exactly 3 more seasons though, the series has been top notch.Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on February 01, 2010, 05:33:29 PM So we're spoilering things that happened at the end of season 5?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 01, 2010, 08:33:49 PM The first chunk of season three (with the polar bear cages, surgery on ben, etc) was the low point of the series for me (though some people seem to hate the middle of season 2 with the talies more). Season four and five were a lot of fun.
I'd say season 3 was the weakest as they were throwing out tons of filler. Once they got the ok to do exactly 3 more seasons though, the series has been top notch. Total agreement. Having an end in sight seems to have resulted in things really tightening up. S3 felt like they were floundering around and then they pulled shit together for the end and it's been steady sailing from then on. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 02, 2010, 08:32:24 AM I hated the flash forwards of the Oceanic 6. So irritating. Season 3 was pretty good I thought.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 02, 2010, 08:38:11 PM Well, the premier was good.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 02, 2010, 08:43:29 PM Well, the premier was good. Best line of the episode, "I'm not a What, I'm a Who." We're heading into something I had feared in the back of my mind. They are going to go to the epic showdown of good and evil. My guess is they twist which side is which. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 02, 2010, 08:57:26 PM Best line of the episode, "I'm not a What, I'm a Who." We're heading into something I had feared in the back of my mind. They are going to go to the epic showdown of good and evil. My guess is they twist which side is which. It appears that's the way it's heading. It seems pretty black and white (ha) which is good and which is bad at this point, but it's almost too convenient at this point. We'll see. Oh and we got a pretty big reveal and now know exactly what the smoke monster is. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 02, 2010, 09:03:57 PM Sayid is Jacob reincarnated.
The LAX timeline is different than "real life". Several characters are different including Desmond being there, Shannon NOT being there and Charlie trying to kill himself saying "he was supposed to die." You will see Man in Black vs. Jacob all season long. The Temple People are just other "others". You saw the stewardess and you saw the two kids that got nabbed in season 2 from the tail of the plain now grown up a little more. I can't remember any of the other tidbits I picked up. I like the recognition of the Man in Black in Locke's body to Richard. "Oh you look good out of chains." and Richard replying with "it's you". Interesting stuff. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 02, 2010, 10:47:49 PM Awesome episodes. It was nice of them to confirm right off that Man in Black was the smoke monster, which the end of season 5 seemed to hint at. I'm also thrilled that they showed there are in fact "other" others. I had that theory ever since season two. Vindicated!
I wouldn't really say though that it looks like a stark battle of good vs. evil. Man in Black is obviously a manipulative dick, but he just wants off the island (god knows how long him and Jacob have been trapped there). He has the power to kill all those people, but didn't. He offered to let the other guys go before they shot him. He wants what he wants, and will do all he can to get it, but I wouldn't really call him a straight on evil evil bad guy. At least from what we've seen so far. However, the smoke monster does bring up some questions though. Like why they were calling it a security system before, and why (going along with that) Ben was able to summon it to defend against the Mercs. Seems odd that Ben could "summon" the man in black. Perhaps theres an automated smoke monster, and then Man in Black can also take on a smoke monster form? Looking forward to them explaining what happened to the French guys who went into the temple, and subsequently "got sick". They went in because the guy who's arm got ripped off yelled he was OK and to come in. But of course we just found his corpse sitting down there. I have no idea where they will go with the flash to parallel time line thing. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 03, 2010, 01:35:20 AM Man in Black is obviously a manipulative dick, but he just wants off the island (god knows how long him and Jacob have been trapped there). Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 03, 2010, 03:03:13 AM Off to a good start. I like the diverging timelines thing -- will be fun to see how these affect / interact / whatever with each other.
Notice that Desmond was on the plane until Jack revived Charlie... and then he was gone. Guess their fates are intertwined there as well as in the original timeline. I suppose we have three major timelines now -- the original 2004 that we followed during the first four seasons (for the most part), the new 2004 where 815 doesn't crash on the island, and the 2007 timeline where Jacob dies and we see the temple. Has unLocke (aka the MIB) always been the smoke monster? Or is the smoke monster a form Jacob can take as well? Or something else entirely? unLocke seemed surprised to learn that unAlex threatened to destroy Ben if he didn't follow Locke at the end of Season 5. Or maybe he was just being extra devious. One wonders. Did Locke actually go on his walkabout in the new timeline or did he lie to Boone? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on February 03, 2010, 03:45:50 AM Did Locke actually go on his walkabout in the new timeline or did he lie to Boone? In the new timeline things are going much better for everyone. I believe what we're seeing is how their lives would have worked-out, had Jacob and MIB not interfered with them at key points in their lives. Hurley still has his chicken franchise and is "the luckiest guy in the world" and Locke seemed genuine about his walkabout. Was a bit of a trip seeing all these old cast members show up, though. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 03, 2010, 05:14:11 AM In the new timeline things are going much better for everyone. I believe what we're seeing is how their lives would have worked-out, had Jacob and MIB not interfered with them at key points in their lives. Hurley still has his chicken franchise and is "the luckiest guy in the world" and Locke seemed genuine about his walkabout. Was a bit of a trip seeing all these old cast members show up, though. I'm not sure on that. Doesn't Jacob bring Locke back to life after he gets pushed out of the window and breaks his back? If he's not there to bring him back to life, wouldn't Locke die right there? Edit: My wife says Jacob was just there. He didn't have anything to do with Locke waking up after the fall. So, hell if I know. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 03, 2010, 07:05:17 AM Man in Black is obviously a manipulative dick, but he just wants off the island (god knows how long him and Jacob have been trapped there). I agree with your spoiler. That's how I took everything. I suppose we have three major timelines now -- the original 2004 that we followed during the first four seasons (for the most part), the new 2004 where 815 doesn't crash on the island, and the 2007 timeline where Jacob dies and we see the temple. There are two timelines now. The "it never happened" timeline and and the current day one (2008). The 1977 guys were kicked back into the same timeline as the rest of the crew. You know this because when the Temple Others set off the fireworks, Richard saw it at the beach. I'm not sure on that. Doesn't Jacob bring Locke back to life after he gets pushed out of the window and breaks his back? If he's not there to bring him back to life, wouldn't Locke die right there? Edit: My wife says Jacob was just there. He didn't have anything to do with Locke waking up after the fall. So, hell if I know. Jacob knelt down and touched him or something when he hit the ground. That was from Season 5. I think with the island blowing up you are seeing the effects of people without the influence of "Fate" and "Free Will" in their lives. I think we might find out that Locke hurt his back a different way, not by being pushed out the window. -- Another thing I just read is that when the stewardess handed Jack more booze on the plane before the turbulance, this time it was only 1 bottle. In season 1 it was two, one he drank and one he put in his pocket which he used as a disinfectant in the pilot episode when he stitched himself up. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 03, 2010, 08:58:47 AM IMDB is not helping me -- does anyone know the name of the actor that played the "translator"? He looked really familiar and I think he might have been the guy who "translated" for Utah Johnny Montana the same way in that one Brisco County episode. If so, that's fucking awesome.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on February 03, 2010, 09:02:49 AM IMDB is not helping me -- does anyone know the name of the actor that played the "translator"? He looked really familiar and I think he might have been the guy who "translated" for Utah Johnny Montana the same way in that one Brisco County episode. If so, that's fucking awesome. The actor is John Hawkes, who played Sol Starr on Deadwood.... Bullock's partner in the general store and Trixie's love interest. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 03, 2010, 09:13:51 AM Much awesome in that episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 03, 2010, 11:07:43 AM She said, "I have a new show. I am outta here, bitches."
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 03, 2010, 11:30:14 AM Much awesome in that episode. Man in Black doesn't want off the island. His home is the island, he doesn't want anyone else on it. My guess his home is the temple that he's being kept out of? My guess. I think the two timelines are not going on at the same time so that the guy can jump between them. I think you're seeing a timeline of what happens after this season is done. Somewhere at the end of season 6 the Losties will do something to change the past. What you're seeing now is that story, but at the same time as everything plays out. It's this season's "flashback". Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 03, 2010, 02:36:54 PM IMDB is not helping me -- does anyone know the name of the actor that played the "translator"? He looked really familiar and I think he might have been the guy who "translated" for Utah Johnny Montana the same way in that one Brisco County episode. If so, that's fucking awesome. The actor is John Hawkes, who played Sol Starr on Deadwood.... Bullock's partner in the general store and Trixie's love interest. Thank you; it is indeed the same guy. In the Brisco episode he was a mute gunslinger's sidekick and his job was to do all his talking. Pretty awesome that he has the exact same role again. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on February 03, 2010, 05:45:53 PM IMDB is not helping me -- does anyone know the name of the actor that played the "translator"? He looked really familiar and I think he might have been the guy who "translated" for Utah Johnny Montana the same way in that one Brisco County episode. If so, that's fucking awesome. The actor is John Hawkes, who played Sol Starr on Deadwood.... Bullock's partner in the general store and Trixie's love interest. Thank you; it is indeed the same guy. In the Brisco episode he was a mute gunslinger's sidekick and his job was to do all his talking. Pretty awesome that he has the exact same role again. One of the things Lost does better than any other show is casting fun and interesting actors in minor parts. - Lt. Daniels from the Wire as Abaddon - Andrea Roth (Rescue Me) as an Other - Mac from It's Always Sunny as an Other - Wayne Pygram (Scorpius in Farscape, young Grand Moff Tarkin in Star Wars) as random faith healer guy - The Dharma torturer is Larry from Newhart (WB Farnsworth in Deadwood, and Joker's henchman in the original Batman, etc) The Whitmore character has always seemed to me to be a part they wrote for Malcolm McDowell. There are just a ton of "hey, it's that guy!" moments that are really fun in Lost. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on February 04, 2010, 02:54:15 AM One of the things Lost does better than any other show is casting fun and interesting actors in minor parts. I expect lost, ultimately to turn out to be a waste of time but I do like the fact that Kimberley Joseph (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0430634/) appeared in the first few seconds of the pilot episode and then disappeared for ages . I recognised her straight away from her major role in cold feet (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0168596/) and was constantly thinking wtf was she doing in such a minor role. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 04, 2010, 11:33:30 AM The Whitmore character has always seemed to me to be a part they wrote for Malcolm McDowell. There are just a ton of "hey, it's that guy!" moments that are really fun in Lost. Widmore :). Anyways, that's probably because of the emphatic, slow way both Alan Dale and Infact, as far as pure acting goes, in my opinion, Michael Emerson (Ben, the actor himself worked a lot in theatres) and Alan Dale (Charles Widmore) are the two best actors in Lost together with Terry O'Quinn, hands down. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 04, 2010, 12:26:27 PM Much awesome in that episode. I wouldn't count Juliet out. When she first saw Sawyer, she thought she was in a Coffee shop, and she new it worked. So I think we are going to run into her in the alternate timeline, and she's going to flash back and forth like Desmond was.Also, is it really necessary to spoiler anything? Everybody is discussing the show here. I'd assume anybody who doesn't want to be spoiler-ed about season 6 wouldn't come reading this. Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on February 04, 2010, 12:33:12 PM Am I the only one who thought that Jack was conscious of the fact that he went from the island back to the plane? It wasn't until he made it clear that he didn't previously know Locke that I realized he was just staring at everyone in confusion. But everytime Jack looked at the black woman (my mind is going blank on her name sorry), Desmond, Kate, etc.. they made him look like he recognized them. That threw me off for a while.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 04, 2010, 01:15:09 PM Her name is Rose. To me it seemed like he was having more of a deja vu type "do I know that person?" thing rather than a conscious recollection.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 04, 2010, 01:35:10 PM It's the deja vu. I don't think he yet realizes that things aren't as they should be yet.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on February 04, 2010, 02:48:10 PM Am I the only one who thought that Jack was conscious of the fact that he went from the island back to the plane? It wasn't until he made it clear that he didn't previously know Locke that I realized he was just staring at everyone in confusion. But everytime Jack looked at the black woman (my mind is going blank on her name sorry), Desmond, Kate, etc.. they made him look like he recognized them. That threw me off for a while. I might be wrong but didn't Jack meet Desmond before the island in a stadium somewhere during one of the old pre time travelling flashbacks, when Desmond called him brother, something to do with his wife. I thought it was him part remembering that. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 04, 2010, 03:05:50 PM Yeah, Jack recognized him from the football stadium when they first met on the island (and he said brother). I'm not sure if the fact that he doesn't recognize him on the plane means they never met like that in this timeline, or the writers got lazy and forgot that if Jack could recognize him in the hatch with a gun pointed at him, he'd probably easily be able to do so on the plane.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 05, 2010, 05:31:52 AM Am I the only one who thought that Jack was conscious of the fact that he went from the island back to the plane? It wasn't until he made it clear that he didn't previously know Locke that I realized he was just staring at everyone in confusion. But everytime Jack looked at the black woman (my mind is going blank on her name sorry), Desmond, Kate, etc.. they made him look like he recognized them. That threw me off for a while. I might be wrong but didn't Jack meet Desmond before the island in a stadium somewhere during one of the old pre time travelling flashbacks, when Desmond called him brother, something to do with his wife. I thought it was him part remembering that. The only thing that threw me, Desmond was never on the plane, he was in the hatch at that point, well after his meeting with jack, and well before they even got to the island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on February 05, 2010, 07:56:44 AM The island was underwater so Desmond could not have landed his boat there.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 05, 2010, 08:01:54 AM The island was underwater so Desmond could not have landed his boat there. Yes, but all of his story, all of it, was invalidated, AND he was on the plane. ALL of it, meeting Lilly, getting the boat, all the penny stuff, her father stuff, meeting jack in the amphitheater (He did not know him on the plane), years of back-story (pre/post hatch or otherwise).... And he is on the plane? I have a feeling that the entire plane thread, is not real. At all. Everyone else essentially picked up where they left off..... Desmond is rewritten, unstuck, out of time, paradox. :tinfoil: At least, in my recollection of all past events. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 05, 2010, 09:01:05 AM You are correct. There is no way that Desmond could be on that plane at that time - except that he never went to the island and we know he was in Australia before Jack got on the plane. If the island doesn't exist, he doesn't crash Widmore's boat on the island, and maybe he doesn't meet Jack before they get on the plane. Remember what he said to Jack when they met in Australia - "See you in another life, brother."
This is that other life. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on February 05, 2010, 11:32:10 AM Here's a good interview with the producers, kind of setting up Season 6 (http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/02/02/lost-premiere-damon-carlton/?ew_packageID=20313460)
Quote LINDELOF: Right out of the gate, in the first five minutes of the premiere, you get hit over the head with two things that you’re not expecting. The first is that Desmond is on the plane. The second thing that we do is we drop out of the plane and we go below the water and we see that the Island is submerged. What we’re trying to do there is basically say to you, “God bless the survivors of Oceanic 815, because they’re so self-centered, they thought the only effect [of detonating the bomb] was going to be that their plane never crashes.” But they don’t stop to think, “If we do this in 1977, what else is going to affected by this?” So that their entire lives can be changed radically. In fact, it would appear that they’ve sunken the Island. That’s our way of saying, “Keep your eyes peeled for the differences that you’re not expecting.”... LINDELOF: ...This is the critical mystery of the season, which is, “What is the relationship between these two shows?” And we don’t use the phrase “alternate reality,” because to call one of them an “alternate reality” is to infer that one of them isn’t real, or one of them is real and the other is the alternate to being real. CUSE: But the questions you’re asking are exactly the right questions. What are we to make of the fact that they’re showing us two different timelines? Are they going to resolve? Are they going to connect? Are they going to co-exist in parallel fashion? Are they going to cross? Do they intersect? Does one prove to be viable and the other one not? I think those are all the kind of speculations that are the right speculations to be having at this point in the season. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 05, 2010, 01:17:22 PM I kinda thought Desmond disappeared on the plane. Like he's skipping through timelines or something.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 05, 2010, 01:19:39 PM Just looked at a wonderful picture of Claire from next week's episode. Will put it in a spoiler, but really there is nothing spoily in it.
The blonde angel is finally back, she's always been my favorite female character of the series :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 05, 2010, 02:00:52 PM What picture?
Here's one for you: (http://media.fukung.net/images/24316/c7f79c60e75780b428b4ba8a919823bd.jpg) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 05, 2010, 02:24:43 PM Oh well, here is the link :heartbreak:
Lovely Claire pic from 6x03: http://i.iimmgg.com/images/gr/d6175825d350ad83b7c9c82a75cb7628.jpg Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 05, 2010, 02:26:22 PM Still not working.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 05, 2010, 02:32:12 PM Still not working. Lies! Posting a Claire pic, take three! And... Action! (http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3499/lovelyclaire.jpg) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 05, 2010, 04:18:24 PM What a terrible picture.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on February 05, 2010, 04:59:43 PM She's cute in this one:
(http://www.lostfan.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/claire_littleton.jpg) Not that it helps make her one of the interesting characters in the show. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 05, 2010, 06:16:51 PM You guys... :heartbreak: :heartbreak: :heartbreak:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 05, 2010, 07:16:09 PM Yeah.....I was never really a Claire fan. Not an annoying character, but not one I really cared about. Thankfully, Lost has done an excellent job of killing every character I didn't like.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 05, 2010, 07:48:20 PM Not that it helps make her one of the interesting characters in the show. I'm assuming by 'favorite' character he means 'most attractive.' It's not like she did all that much in the show other than have a baby and pretend to like Charlie for a while. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rendakor on February 05, 2010, 07:53:45 PM Not that it helps make her one of the interesting characters in the show. I'm assuming by 'favorite' character he means 'most attractive.' It's not like she did all that much in the show other than have a baby and pretend to like Charlie for a while. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on February 06, 2010, 05:07:25 AM Yes, Shannon could win an Oscar for sunbathing. :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rendakor on February 06, 2010, 08:27:19 AM I said she was hot, I didn't say she could act.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on February 06, 2010, 10:57:43 AM No, I agree. They might all be hot and maybe they can even act. I don't think the writers had acting ability in mind for their roles.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 06, 2010, 11:08:37 AM (http://z.about.com/d/lost/1/0/d/I/-/-/shannon-cry.jpg)
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on February 06, 2010, 05:03:29 PM good one
that's how I remember her Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 06, 2010, 05:05:16 PM That pretty much sums up her entire character arc.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 06, 2010, 09:27:35 PM I remember her as, "Oh look, here's a blond bitch I want to die."
To be fair though, Kate is the brunette bitch I wanted to die. :heartbreak: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 07, 2010, 05:25:39 AM I remember her as, "Oh look, here's a blond bitch I want to die." To be fair though, Kate is the brunette bitch I wanted to die. :heartbreak: Kate still sucks and needs to die. She's basically the only character at this point that has annoyed me since almost the beginning that they haven't killed off. I used to say the same about Jack, but over the last season's worth of episodes, he's come around a bit. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 07, 2010, 02:16:41 PM It's started to grate on me more and more, but does anybody notice how often nobody answers questions on the show and they just change topics? Very rarely early on in the show was anybody called on it. That shit just doesn't fly in my fantasy world of a desert island with no laws. It's like everyone has a short term memory problem.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 09, 2010, 07:11:52 PM Worthless episode tonight. Nothing happened. Nothing was answered. Nothing changed.
You could of condensed that whole episode into 5 minutes. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 09, 2010, 08:47:38 PM Worthless episode tonight. Nothing happened. Nothing was answered. Nothing changed. You could of condensed that whole episode into 5 minutes. Yep, it was truly terrible. We're back to the old ways of "Give them something in the first shows, then ramble on with filler in the entire middle." Sayid might have something bad in him, and the Others want to contain that. (We knew this already, or at least could infer it very simply given he died) Crazy other people on the island ask for private meetings all the time, and never tell anybody anything. (Been there, done that, beat the horse we rode in on) Kate and Claire experience similar events to the island in the other reality (Yes, they're setting a stage here, but it's really too long) Sawyer is sad about Juliet. Kate continues to waffle her fucking ass off. (I don't even need to say it) No Ben, no Richard, no Locke-thing, no Jacob, absolutely no reason to bother with this episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 09, 2010, 09:09:42 PM Usually, if there's no Ben or Locke, the show really suffers. Tonight was no exception.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 09, 2010, 09:11:34 PM Ya, but we got our mandatory Kate episode out of way.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nonentity on February 09, 2010, 10:27:47 PM I liked tonight! I was seriously creeped out seeing Ethan in the hospital with Kate and Claire. Also, yay seeing Rob (http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Rob_McElhenney) again! And pissed off. That's when he is at his best.
Maybe I was just hyped up on caffeine, but the scene with Sawyer being all pissy about proposing was... mildly touching? Also, lol, Claire-Rousseau. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 09, 2010, 10:52:16 PM Viewed in a vacuum, I enjoyed this episode just fine, but we're in the final stretch. I was hoping fluff like this would be absent. It's giving me unpleasant BSG flashbacks.
Claire-Rousseau made me chuckle. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 10, 2010, 08:18:04 AM It's a setup episode. I liked it. We're going to have a few episodes like this that clear the table of baggage for other shit to happen. Hopefully, there won't be more table-clearing episodes than HOLY SHIT DO YOU BELIEVE THAT episodes this season.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Johny Cee on February 10, 2010, 09:37:26 AM It's a setup episode. This. You have to move the characters and the story around to set up the next big plot event. There was some decent story movement, though. 1. Indirectly confirmed alot of stuff related to the black smoke. The black smoke is the Big Bad Guy/Un-Locke, who is also responsible for the infection stuff from season 1/2. Also confirms that Christian (and therefore everyone else who has shown up but is dead) is the Bad Guy/Smokey/Un-Locke, since Claire was with Christian the last few times we saw her and Claire is thought to be infected/"claimed". 2. We had to have Sawyer mourning Juliet to set up whatever fucked up nonsense he would get up to later. Otherwise it would come off as completely nonsensical when he showed up and did whatever awful thing he will definitely do. 3. Claire taking over Rousseau's role is an interesting callback, and sets up Jin's arc of trying to get back to Sun while dealing with crazy and/or infected Claire. With any luck, Claire and Kate will kill each other! 4. It did get a Kate-centric episode out of the way in a relatively painless manner, considering she sucks. 5. The Jack/Other leader is setting up Jack for another crack at a leadership arc, hopefully after he learned his lessons in earlier seasons. There was story/plot advancement here. It wasn't a bullshit stand-alone filler episode that didn't do anything. The weakest part about the episode is that it didn't deal with the most interesting characters, which are Locke (un-Locke), Ben, Desmond (does he even have a large role this season?), or Richard. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on February 10, 2010, 10:10:37 AM I don't care about Kate, Claire, Sawyer being emo tough guy at all. I don't care about stupid, obvious circular allusions to Rousseau -- that's lazy. They didn't do much to advance the plot, and this whole flash-present stuff is starting to feel like Touched-by-an-Angel.
If there's threat -- and there is with un-Locke -- they need to get on with that and then watch how everyone else falls into place around that conflict. Including all the history. Evil reveals itself. Watch the drama unfold and understand all the previous conflicts and confusions. But no. More journey of discovery stuff with Kate. Cripes. Bringing back Claire was like as bad as getting into work and finding detergent stains all over your black jumper. "Cripes, how did that not get washed out?" Disappointing bridge episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 10, 2010, 01:25:57 PM Claire is back, and she's pissed off, you bitches. :drill: :drill: :heart:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 10, 2010, 01:55:30 PM So these infected people are other others we have been expecting/fearing. If Claire is one Smokey's minions, that would make her quite different the Rousseau. Rousseau killed her husband after he became minion-fied.
I guess Jacob could be a smoke monster as well. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 10, 2010, 03:07:49 PM I guess Jacob could be a smoke monster as well. Back in season 2, Locke was talking to Eko about the monster, and said what he saw was beautiful and white. So, yeah, probably. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on February 10, 2010, 03:12:37 PM Which means the show will end with an epic smoke monster on smoke monster fight!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 10, 2010, 04:46:25 PM Seen it.
(http://www.shallownation.com/images/snoop-dogg-willie-nelson2.jpg) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 12, 2010, 06:56:41 AM This is all just reinforcing my theory from session one, its all cyclic, the factions always stay the same, just the players progress.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 17, 2010, 01:58:43 AM Great episode. And we now know at least part of the significance of the numbers.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 17, 2010, 06:18:49 AM Great episode. And we now know at least part of the significance of the numbers. Not really. Where are the number in between those? Are they other people? Also, I'm pretty sure that blond haired kid wasn't Jacob but some other "above the fray" guy. Good ep though. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 17, 2010, 08:11:48 AM Very good episode. So Shadow Locke isn't a god, per se, but a man trapped on the island as a cosmic counterbalance - the yang to Jacob's yin (or vice versa). And he's damn tired of being on the island and wants off. To that end, he has to kill Jacob, which I assume triggers some sequence whereby both Jacob and anti-Locke gets replaced with some other
Lots of questions, most having to do with the sideways timeline. Is Ben Linus in Locke's school because he never went to the island (which would lead you to believe the island was sunk long before Ben would have gotten there, meaning the diverging of the timeline didn't happen in the '70's with the incident), or is it the scheming Ben from the island as part of some other plot? Both Locke and anti-Locke make the same statement when told they can't do something: "Don't tell me what I can't do." Or something to that effect. Does that mean anti-Locke escapes as real Locke and the sideways timeline is the way he does it? And why does the Latina Fun Bags on the beach know so much about the people on the island? Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on February 17, 2010, 08:33:23 AM Locke's funeral was one of those great moments that can only happen on Lost.
Sawyer has become a pretty great character. As a con man, he has to be expecting the con, he's basically good but very demoralized. It's impossible to know what he is going to do. Really curious what they are going with Ben, his request to be judged by the island was a sham. So will he seek his redemption in other ways, or will he go back to his old ways? EDIT: Maybe Ben doesn't want redemption anymore if it was predicated on counterfeit resurrection. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on February 17, 2010, 09:12:29 AM yes great stuff. Thank God we got through with Kate last week.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on February 17, 2010, 09:20:17 AM I couldn't help laughing whenever the dramatic lost noises came on during the alternate timeline whenever two Losties would meet each other.
So funny. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on February 17, 2010, 09:41:56 AM nice touch when Locke and Ben meet. Ben teaches European History and Locke is a "substitute", which is the name of the episode. And thus the whole revelation of the Losties as possible candidates, maybe. I love the idea of Sawyer playing the long con.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 17, 2010, 10:40:26 AM Very good episode. So Shadow Locke isn't a god, per se, but a man trapped on the island as a cosmic counterbalance - the yang to Jacob's yin (or vice versa). And he's damn tired of being on the island and wants off. To that end, he has to kill Jacob, which I assume triggers some sequence whereby both Jacob and anti-Locke gets replaced with some other Of course, this all assumes Flocke is telling Sawyer the truth. Remember that conversation he had with Jacob in the finale. He seemed more pissed that Jacob kept bringing annoying strangers to his fun party, than because he was trapped there. Quote And why does the Latina Fun Bags on the beach know so much about the people on the island? This has been bothering me somewhat about *ahem* Latina Fun Bags. She knew what was in the box. She knew why they were carting it across the island to show to the Others. But she didn't recognize Locke right off the bat when he first appeared? Even if, for whatever reason, she didn't immediately look in the box to confirm what Mr. Black looks like, shouldn't she have been at least a little suspicious of some mysterious dude who appeared out of nowhere? Especially when he says shit like, "I remember dying"? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lianka on February 17, 2010, 10:45:25 AM Did anyone notice the names that _weren't_ specifically pointed out on the wall? Kate's, Claire's, and the other Kwon. Did anyone catch them in the background, or were they completely absent?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on February 17, 2010, 10:50:40 AM the other Kwon Notice that when they went through the names, the scene where Jacob met them was replayed, and he made an effort to physically touch each of them? He touched both Kwons on the shoulder, so it can be theorized that they are considered the same 'number,' whatever that actually means. As to your actual question, I don't remember seeing the other names you mentioned, but the scene seemed to be deliberately staged so that the viewer would have a hard time deciphering names on the wall other than the showcased ones. I imagine having a Tivo would help some, though. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 17, 2010, 10:55:48 AM the other Kwon Notice that when they went through the names, the scene where Jacob met them was replayed, and he made an effort to physically touch each of them? He touched both Kwons on the shoulder, so it can be theorized that they are considered the same 'number,' whatever that actually means. I suspect the ambiguity of this point is the sole reason that everyone is referenced by last name on the wall. My guess is that the "important" Kwon is their child. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 17, 2010, 11:43:03 AM There isn't enough time in the show left for their child to be of any consequence unless they do some time traveling later on (which the producers said they weren't going to do).
And here is someone elses theory from another message board regarding the new character (blond kid) that MiB and Sawyer can see. I thought it was interesting. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 17, 2010, 06:17:49 PM I'm starting to think it's more and more likely that the flash-sideways is actually the ending of the show, and the other timeline will show us how that reality came into existence.
There are some inconsistencies that need to be explained if that's true (why did Jack have blood on his neck/seemingly recognize Desmond, where is Christian's corpse, why did Juliet say it worked if The Incident didn't cause the divergence, etc), but I could see satisfactory explanations for those questions that still fit in with the theory. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 17, 2010, 09:44:22 PM At this point, even though they've said it isn't Atlantis, it just screams Atlantis.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 18, 2010, 06:28:51 AM It does?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on February 18, 2010, 06:54:00 AM Well the island IS underwater in the alternate reality...
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 18, 2010, 05:58:00 PM It does? Mystical island, moving around that nobody can find through time, with ancient protectors and a crumbling set of old ruins and temples, magical powers, and outside forces that are trying desperately to get at. There's also a fountain of youth aspect to the island as well. And the whole thing ends up underwater in the other reality, as stated before. I'm really really afraid at this point that what we think of as the alternate reality turns out to be the true reality, and what we witnessed was a whole bunch of dream-related bullshit that never really took place. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 24, 2010, 12:49:22 AM Claire is :ye_gods:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 24, 2010, 01:33:57 AM Why the hell did Jack have to bust the sweet lighthouse dealie? I would have spun that fucker around a few times.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 24, 2010, 07:46:06 AM Because every instinct Jack has is wrong. He's George Costanza and he doesn't know it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 24, 2010, 11:33:28 AM Jack is Jacob's replacement. The appearance of Dogan in the sideways timeline along with Jack's ability to get over his daddy issues for his own son (who didn't exist in the other timeline that I know of) tells me that the sideways timeline is a test to determine which candidate should replace which entity or something.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 24, 2010, 11:36:25 AM Jack is Jacob's replacement. The appearance of Dogan in the sideways timeline along with Jack's ability to get over his daddy issues for his own son (who didn't exist in the other timeline that I know of) tells me that the sideways timeline is a test to determine which candidate should replace which entity or something. Oo, I like that. But then why are we seeing so much of Locke, if he's dead in the "real" timeline? Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on February 24, 2010, 11:38:42 AM He's the smoke monster who has escaped the island, only he did so in a new body without knowledge of his previous life on the island. :grin:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on February 24, 2010, 12:17:33 PM The Man in Black took over Locke but I think there is a little piece of Locke still in there and he may come free one day...
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 24, 2010, 02:37:04 PM Muahhah, I want a splatter spin-off with Claire ripping body parts with her trustworthy hatchet :heart: :heart: :heart:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 24, 2010, 03:22:10 PM I would watch that show in a heartbeat. Maybe she could team up with Sheri Moon Zombie as Baby Firefly.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on February 24, 2010, 03:53:14 PM I mean, that "Are you still my friend Jin?"
Jin -----> :oh_i_see: :ye_gods: "Yes!" :heart: :heart: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 24, 2010, 06:05:14 PM This whole "Candidate" business just seems to be an expanded version of what we had with the hatch. Crazy dude living in his own zone trying desperately to keep the world from ending, waiting forever for a worthy replacement to relieve him of his duties.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on February 24, 2010, 06:08:45 PM Hurley is the new "Jacob." Assuming that is the ending you are predicting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The two timelines will coincide. As with most dual timeline theories they are starting to bleed together "Hey mom when did I get my appendix out?" Whats gonna happen is Jacob will be revived, the crashies will take on the various roles around the island, and we will end where we began. Spaceship or some such shit. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on February 24, 2010, 09:28:53 PM Hurley is the new "Jacob." Assuming that is the ending you are predicting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The two timelines will coincide. As with most dual timeline theories they are starting to bleed together "Hey mom when did I get my appendix out?" Whats gonna happen is Jacob will be revived, the crashies will take on the various roles around the island, and we will end where we began. Spaceship or some such shit. Yep, Hurley is the guy. I'm not sure about the melding part. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on February 24, 2010, 09:33:36 PM Liking this season. "That's not John. That's my friend." That's *creepy* is what that is. ^^
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on February 24, 2010, 11:46:07 PM I really love this series right now. But I'm feeling a cognitive dissonance with the writers. I think I'm not supposed to cheer at the thought of Claire killing Kate. I think I should worry for poor Kate, but I say the sooner the better.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 25, 2010, 05:41:50 AM Whos name was at 160.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 25, 2010, 08:51:19 AM I thought Who was on first?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on February 25, 2010, 10:15:11 AM ya great stuff. Need now the list of all names that were on the wheel. Internet plz deliver....
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on February 25, 2010, 10:30:11 AM Hawking and Widmore would be the two names to look for, methinks.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Hawkbit on February 25, 2010, 10:34:42 AM I missed a couple things in that episode. Jacob asked Hurley to turn the lighthouse mirror to 108 (heh, like the hatch 108 minutes and the sum of 4,8,15,16,23,42) but did we actually see what 108 was? I thought Jack stopped it around 120 or so. I likely missed an important piece.
What's the 160 reference from? I feel like I need a :plane flies over head: emote. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 25, 2010, 11:49:48 AM What's the 160 reference from? I feel like I need a :plane flies over head: emote. Me being confused, I was asking whos name was on the mark jacob sent them to turn the mirror to. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on February 25, 2010, 12:12:16 PM Didn't he say it was a him? My guess is Desmond.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on February 25, 2010, 01:33:10 PM Didn't he say it was a him? My guess is Desmond. Oooh. I bet that's who it is. Nice. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on February 25, 2010, 01:42:47 PM Reports are that it names someone new.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 02, 2010, 07:04:36 PM Fucking...awesome. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 02, 2010, 07:19:59 PM Another terrible episode that really didn't do much to advance the story at all. They are splitting up into a story for all the characters while progressing the plot and hour or two.
This is like one of the later Jordan novels that spend all it's time jerking around and you really don't give a shit going on but you you're hoping for an epic last chapter. I bet Kate start tugging her hair next episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: MournelitheCalix on March 02, 2010, 07:44:45 PM Lost reminds me of the Ravenloft campaign setting.
Darklord ....check. Darklord with fantastic powers.....check. Land is the prison of the darklord......check. Whispers in the shadows..... check. My useless analysis for what its worth. In any case, my guess was proven wrong already. I thought they were in purgatory. I can't wait to see how this ends. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 02, 2010, 08:17:08 PM Another terrible episode that really didn't do much to advance the story at all. They are splitting up into a story for all the characters while progressing the plot and hour or two. This is like one of the later Jordan novels that spend all it's time jerking around and you really don't give a shit going on but you you're hoping for an epic last chapter. I bet Kate start tugging her hair next episode. Wow you really missed the point of this episode. Nothing happened in the story? They iced the whole temple! Kate wandering about the town in alternate universe, that's nothing happening. Not to mention that I still don't think that UnLocke's side is evil yet. They are really really setting the stage for Jacob being the evil force on the island. Notice that when confronted by Sayid, Drogan (if that's the Japanese leader's name) says that the machine is for checking the scales. They test good and evil, and here's the key... he says, "Yours came up on the wrong side." He never says, you were evil. He just says it's the wrong side. Sayid then tries to justify that he's not evil, and gets attacked. I'll go even further with the point. Drogan only pulls off of him when he thinks back to something remotely decent in his life, and intimates that Jacob offers a hard line deal to get to the island. Nothing Jacob is doing so far is for the greater good. Nothing the smoke monster has done beyond smashing the ridiculous followers of Jacob, who answer no questions and kill for reasons beyond our pitiful understanding, has been evil. In fact, he's giving second chances out to most folks like they are candy, unless you side with Jacob. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 02, 2010, 08:51:51 PM Wow you really missed the point of this episode. Nothing happened in the story? They iced the whole temple! Kate wandering about the town in alternate universe, that's nothing happening. Not to mention that I still don't think that UnLocke's side is evil yet. They are really really setting the stage for Jacob being the evil force on the island. Notice that when confronted by Sayid, Drogan (if that's the Japanese leader's name) says that the machine is for checking the scales. They test good and evil, and here's the key... he says, "Yours came up on the wrong side." He never says, you were evil. He just says it's the wrong side. Sayid then tries to justify that he's not evil, and gets attacked. The temple is gone? The one we knew about for 4-5 episodes? Oh I know we knew about it as some mysterious thing that no one knew what is what. Great. But I didn't have any connection with it. I didn't see Kate wandering anywhere in this episode. Where was she? The whole good/evil thing is getting a little thin. It's not progressing at all. it's just more hints and gesturing. Nothing is being resolved. Though I don't expect it to until the end, so still nothing happened. Still a bad episode. They are focusing too much on a single character and not them all as a group. I thought it was bad when they kept going back and forth with the '70s people and the rescued people in the other seasons. This is just irritating. It's that part of the book when your main group of character split up and have to go through a bunch of boring chapters to get back to the good part. Just like Robert Jordan. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on March 02, 2010, 09:34:01 PM Another terrible episode that really didn't do much to advance the story at all. They are splitting up into a story for all the characters while progressing the plot and hour or two. This is like one of the later Jordan novels that spend all it's time jerking around and you really don't give a shit going on but you you're hoping for an epic last chapter. I bet Kate start tugging her hair next episode. Wow you really missed the point of this episode. Nothing happened in the story? They iced the whole temple! Kate wandering about the town in alternate universe, that's nothing happening. Not to mention that I still don't think that UnLocke's side is evil yet. They are really really setting the stage for Jacob being the evil force on the island. Notice that when confronted by Sayid, Drogan (if that's the Japanese leader's name) says that the machine is for checking the scales. They test good and evil, and here's the key... he says, "Yours came up on the wrong side." He never says, you were evil. He just says it's the wrong side. Sayid then tries to justify that he's not evil, and gets attacked. I'll go even further with the point. Drogan only pulls off of him when he thinks back to something remotely decent in his life, and intimates that Jacob offers a hard line deal to get to the island. Nothing Jacob is doing so far is for the greater good. Nothing the smoke monster has done beyond smashing the ridiculous followers of Jacob, who answer no questions and kill for reasons beyond our pitiful understanding, has been evil. In fact, he's giving second chances out to most folks like they are candy, unless you side with Jacob. Dogen specifically says Fake Locke is pure evil. Fake Locke can't kill Sayid, because he's a candidate. It's got nothing to do with having a good nature. The kid in the woods from a few eps ago was even saying how he can't just kill Sawyer. He has to follow the rules (or he forfeits his prize of being able to return home if he wins?). He's manipulated events just as much as Jacob has, all as a means to satisfy his own agenda. I doubt they're setting him up to be the good guy. If anything, they're just blurring the lines. It's a game, and they're both playing to win. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 02, 2010, 10:08:38 PM In the alternate timeline, Dogen's son is alive. Does that mean that Jacob engineered the accident that killed Dogen's son in the first place?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on March 02, 2010, 10:08:45 PM I thought it rocked. Lots of good action, a cool martial arts fight, some good one liners from Miles, and it's always fun seeing Keamy get wiped out.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on March 03, 2010, 03:13:02 AM Perfectly good episode. I'm content!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 03, 2010, 06:11:23 AM Dogen specifically says Fake Locke is pure evil. Everyone says their enemy is pure evil; it doesn't mean he actually is. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on March 03, 2010, 06:39:11 AM Well, let me just say:
Catch a falling star an’ put it in your pocket, Never let it fade away... Catch a falling star an’ put it in your pocket, Save it for a rainy day... Fantastic, chilling episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 03, 2010, 10:05:40 AM Great fucking episode. As for evil/not-evil Locke, I'm thinking he is the dark side of the equation. They aren't necessarily saying that he's evil (Dogan's comment aside) but that he's selfish. It isn't old school Mephistopheles evil, it's "I want what I want and fuck everyone else" evil. He wants off the island, but the Vanzetti equation, the keyboard at the computer, the giant electromagnetic thingie, I think it all points to the island being crucial to the universe. There has to be the balance between Jacob and Anti-Locke or whoever takes their place and if one or both are removed from the equation, shit starts to break down.
The sideways timeline is proving that all of these people are destined to come together somehow, some way. Sayeed's brother showing up in Jack's hospital, Ben Linus showing up at Locke's school, Keemo dealing with Sayeed and Jin, Jack and Dogan meeting up, Hurley and Locke meeting up, etc. Whatever cosmic force brings them to the island brings them together when the island is underwater. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 03, 2010, 12:15:05 PM So I'm rewatching it now on Hulu, and something is bugging me.
Why did Dogan send Sayid out to meet Locke with a dagger in his hand? Locke said it was because Dogan wanted him to kill Sayid, but I think Dogan knew that wouldn't happen -- he sent Sayid after Claire suggested that he send someone Locke wouldn't kill, i.e. a candidate. Did Dogan actually think Sayid would be able to kill Locke, the same way that Ben was able to kill Jacob? I don't get the impression he'd make a mistake like that. Maybe Sayid can only kill Locke after he's been recruited (i.e. Ben could only kill Jacob because Ben had been "recruited" by Jacob)? And Sayid will end up redeeming himself by realizing this and killing Locke at a critical moment? Maybe it'll make more sense once I get to the scene where Dogan is explaining things to Sayid. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 03, 2010, 02:28:05 PM so next week it's Ben's flash sidewise episode. Who is left to profile before we can get on with it?
Ben Jin/Song Hurley Sawyer last episodes to go: Quote 7 110 "Dr. Linus" 8 111 "Recon" 9 112 "Ab Aeterno" (“from the beginning of time”) 10 113 "The Package" 11 114 "Happily Ever After" 12 115 "Everybody Loves Hugo" 13 116 "The Last Recruit" Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on March 03, 2010, 03:27:57 PM "Aeb Aeterno" should be THE Episode, since it's going to deal with
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 03, 2010, 03:37:21 PM Betcha "Recon" is about Sawyer. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 03, 2010, 05:59:19 PM So I'm rewatching it now on Hulu, and something is bugging me. Why did Dogan send Sayid out to meet Locke with a dagger in his hand? Locke said it was because Dogan wanted him to kill Sayid, but I think Dogan knew that wouldn't happen -- he sent Sayid after Claire suggested that he send someone Locke wouldn't kill, i.e. a candidate. Did Dogan actually think Sayid would be able to kill Locke, the same way that Ben was able to kill Jacob? I don't get the impression he'd make a mistake like that. Maybe Sayid can only kill Locke after he's been recruited (i.e. Ben could only kill Jacob because Ben had been "recruited" by Jacob)? And Sayid will end up redeeming himself by realizing this and killing Locke at a critical moment? Maybe it'll make more sense once I get to the scene where Dogan is explaining things to Sayid. Because Dogan and his ilk are the evil on the island, or another evil on the island and there is no good. Jacob and all of his people are seriously into telling everyone lies in order to get what they need all the time for the "greater good." Of course Dogan knew it wouldn't work. That's why he told him to jam it into his chest before he even had the chance to talk. He was hoping BlackLocke would wipe out one of his own before he could turn, since he finally found his moral compass and let Sayid go. He still felt tied to his duty in the temple, but he couldn't pull the trigger himself. Everything I know about Jacob makes him look like a giant manipulative dick. Do we have a lot of examples where Jacob has actually helped anyone when it wasn't directly associated with fucking them into a rock and a hard place later? Here's my guess on what he's up to. He's manipulating and looking hard for the right candidate because he's waiting around to steal their soul and body to feed his "godhood" for the next 1000 years. They aren't there to replace him at all. The more and more it unfolds, I expect the Jacob camp to be the writers shot at organized religion and their duplicity. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 03, 2010, 06:22:09 PM Of course Dogan knew it wouldn't work. That's why he told him to jam it into his chest before he even had the chance to talk. He was hoping BlackLocke would wipe out one of his own before he could turn, since he finally found his moral compass and let Sayid go. That's the story Locke told, but I still don't buy it, specifically because of what Claire said about Dogan sending someone Locke wouldn't kill. At which point Dogan turned to Sayid as being the obvious choice for that job. And he didn't look at all surprised that Sayid came back alive. I don't think he expected either of them to die at that meeting, which means he had some other agenda. Re: Jacob and religion, remember "GOD LOVES YOU AS HE LOVED JACOB" from Ben's brainwashing film? I'm hoping that will make sense at some point. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on March 03, 2010, 07:02:30 PM Dogan saw the baseball drop right before he killed Sayid, and remembered his promise to Jacob. Killing the candidates is against the rules, even if he thinks its for the best. Getting someone else to kill a candidate is just a loophole.
But I'm not sure he thought Flock would kill him. He didn't just hand him any old knife, he was keeping one special. Jacob probably gave it to him, and told Dogan to use it when he had the chance. I also got the impression that Dogan knew he would die on the island; part of his bargain with Jacob. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 03, 2010, 09:23:11 PM Of course Dogan knew it wouldn't work. That's why he told him to jam it into his chest before he even had the chance to talk. He was hoping BlackLocke would wipe out one of his own before he could turn, since he finally found his moral compass and let Sayid go. That's the story Locke told, but I still don't buy it, specifically because of what Claire said about Dogan sending someone Locke wouldn't kill. At which point Dogan turned to Sayid as being the obvious choice for that job. And he didn't look at all surprised that Sayid came back alive. I don't think he expected either of them to die at that meeting, which means he had some other agenda. Re: Jacob and religion, remember "GOD LOVES YOU AS HE LOVED JACOB" from Ben's brainwashing film? I'm hoping that will make sense at some point. The only agenda possible from that line of logic is leading the people out of the temple to follow nonLocke in order to save them. That's assuming you know in advance Sayid comes back and warns the people before he destroys the temple. And after all that Drogan still ends up dead. I'm not buying into Jacob as anything but wrong. The whole white and black imagery. Tossing the white stone into the ocean and calling it an inside joke. Nothing that Jacob says is real. He will lie and use more people than anybody. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on March 03, 2010, 10:25:50 PM Dogan did say: "He will come to you as someone you know. Someone who has died. As soon as you see him, plunge this deep into his chest. If you allow him to speak, it is already too late."
Sayid encounters unlocke: "Hello Sayid." *stab* "Now why'd you go and do that?" Not, mind you, that I entirely trust Dogan. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 04, 2010, 06:13:05 AM Just going to leave that here. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on March 04, 2010, 07:23:39 AM *backs away slowly*
:ye_gods: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 04, 2010, 07:25:56 AM Thats Batmanuel, and he was awesome!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 04, 2010, 09:00:01 AM Oh man, I totally forgot that was the same guy.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Lucas on March 04, 2010, 09:14:11 AM Just a word of warning: in the next couple of days, the Lost crew will start filming the Series Finale (yep, that's it).
Obviously, spoilers will start coming through, albeit slowly, but eventually more and more stuff will start to leak. If you don't want to be spoiled, be extremely careful from now on when surfing forums, blogs, even youtube videos. People are always ready to ruin teh fun, especially in this case, with the anticipation growing and all that. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on March 04, 2010, 09:04:16 PM I use to follow some of the other lost pages to catch up on easter egg's, hints, and theories I missed, but now I've stopped for the last season. This thread is the only Lost related thing I view on the internet. So don't fuck it up, OR THERE WILL BE BLOOD.
As to the Jacob = Evil thing, I'm not seeing it Paelos. That would be the most fucked up "good" side in history if MIB was suppose to be good. He's killed shitloads of people now. He went to a man who's tried desperately to atone for his past and said, "Hey, you want to see your loved one again? I need to to go murder some fucking people and fuck your morals and soul searching. DO IT." Which seems to have taken their toll on him mentally (the end of this last episode seems to show that Dogan's statement that once the darkness reached his heart, Sayid would be totally gone, has come true). As smoke monster (if he was truly the only "smoke monster" on the island at least), he's been knocking off random people, and trying to kill others, since the beginning of the show. Also, remember that Richard Alpert seems terrified of him, and he has some weird deep connection with the island that goes beyond all this. Also, Flocke grabbed the white stone from the scale and threw it into the ocean after Jacob died (though that could easily be mis-direction if your theory is true). Then there's also the fact that the others working for Jacob were concerned about finding the "good" people amongst the survivors and recruiting them. These including children who are innocent. No, I think Flocke is bad, and Jacob is good, but lines are a bit blurred. Flocke is Lawful Evil. Charismatic evil. Manipulative evil. He wants what he wants and will manipulate his way to get it, and will happily betray everybody as need be. Jacob is the same way but good. He needs a "good" replacement for the island. It has to be specific, and he needs to manipulate events out of need to get that person, which fucks up lives, but it needs to be done. He is sympathetic, but there is no help for it. They are both manipulative gods playing chess against each other with Mortals as the pawns, but to achieve different ends. In a way this sort of makes them both bastards, but overall once is working for a good cause while the other isn't. Also, everybody, you guys did notice that both Dogan and hippy dude where killed and left in the magical fountain of life that cures all wounds and apparently death sometimes, right? I wouldn't count them out of this yet, or that things aren't going according to plan. Dogan did very specifically give him that dagger. Maybe the fact that he was stabbed with it did something to him that will make him be defeated later on somehow. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 05, 2010, 09:06:29 AM Someone explain to me how Ben stabbed Jacob and killed him but Sayid stabbed FakeLocke and nothing happened.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on March 05, 2010, 09:42:17 AM Someone explain to me how Ben stabbed Jacob and killed him but Sayid stabbed FakeLocke and nothing happened. I'm assuming it has something to do with the fact that Flocke (or unlocke or whatever) is a condensed smoke monster and I haven't seen any evidence that Jacob was a smoke monster too. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 05, 2010, 10:10:28 AM Someone explain to me how Ben stabbed Jacob and killed him but Sayid stabbed FakeLocke and nothing happened. Again, my theory on this is that they can only be hurt by their own "recruits". The only way for Flocke to kill Jacob was to trick one of his own people into doing the deed. When Sayid stabbed Flocke he wasn't working for him yet. I can't believe the writers would rob Sayid of his redemption, though, which means I think he's going to end up turning on Flocke in the end, like Vader and the Emperor. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 05, 2010, 10:13:11 AM For some reason, I didn't think about Dogan and hippy dude floating in the pool of resurrection. Only, if the pool is corrupted, it means they'll come out corrupted as well.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 05, 2010, 10:14:21 AM For some reason that scene struck me as Sayid deliberately "defiling" the pool, either to corrupt or neutralize it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 09, 2010, 07:08:03 PM Awesome episode tonight.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on March 09, 2010, 07:09:10 PM I totally expected it all to go another way.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 09, 2010, 08:55:22 PM That was some amazing acting. Ben continues to jerk at both the mind and the heart in ridiculously conflicting ways.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 09, 2010, 10:13:57 PM Even if we're headed toward a stupid series finale a la BSG, which I doubt, this season was worth it just to see Ben have a little moment of redemption.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on March 10, 2010, 12:49:02 AM They are so goddamn lucky they had him for a guest star back in season two and decided to keep him.
EDIT: s/start/star/ Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 10, 2010, 07:22:26 AM They are so goddamn lucky they had him for a guest start back in season two and decided to keep him. Yeah. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 10, 2010, 11:19:06 AM Yeah, Ben proves he can act like a motherfucker without saying a word... AGAIN. He is an actor that just keeps on giving.
So we now definitely know that the candidates are there to replace Jacob - but are they also there to replace the Smoke Monster? We don't exactly have confirmation of that, and I'm guessing Anti-Locke is not going to tell his candidates that they are meant to replace him. Also, the Sideways Locke dropping a little hint of corruption into the Sideways Ben Linus pool makes me continue to think I'm right about Sideways Locke - he IS the Smoke Monster escaped though he doesn't know it. They are really going to have to fuck the series finale in the ass to tarnish this season. Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on March 10, 2010, 12:17:52 PM When Anti-Locke helped Ben escape he mentioned that he needed someone to look after things when he left, so I'm definitely thinking someone has to replace Anti-Locke. After seeing the submarine at the end of last night's episode I'm thinking Whidmore might be the front runner now that Ben has made his choice.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 10, 2010, 12:34:10 PM That or maybe MIB (I'm going to go with "Man in Black" because that's what the annotated Lost episodes call him) is trying to influence who will take Jacob's place, because he wants the new Jacob to be someone he can get favors out of? If it was just a matter of finding his own replacement, I don't see why he needed to kill Jacob.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on March 10, 2010, 02:22:53 PM I was thinking more along the lines of:
Step 1: Kill Jacob Step 2: Find replacement Step 3: Leave island and profit We know they're playing by a set of rules. We don't how or what is enforcing those rules, but we know they exist. Perhaps in order for MIB to escape the island he had/has to complete steps 1 and 2. Because dem da rules. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on March 10, 2010, 09:05:18 PM EDIT: Never mind, couldn't get link to work.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 11, 2010, 08:14:11 AM Here's another point I don't know about.
Ben went to the Smoke Monster to be "judged". He wasn't aware of Jacobs vs. Man in Black? However Other's knew who the smoke monster was and how to protect themselves from him. Why did Ben go to the Smoke monster in the first place? I don't get it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 11, 2010, 09:11:12 AM Maybe while Jacob was alive the MIB was bound by a stricter set of rules? Or maybe they could both turn into smoke monsters?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 11, 2010, 09:12:20 AM Its a balance thing.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 11, 2010, 10:47:47 AM Here's another point I don't know about. Ya, Ben's judgment scene doesn't make much sense in the current story. I thought he went to the Temple to be judged by the Island. In past they referred to the smoke monster as a security system, so I guess Ben thought it was an emissary of the Island.Ben went to the Smoke Monster to be "judged". He wasn't aware of Jacobs vs. Man in Black? However Other's knew who the smoke monster was and how to protect themselves from him. Why did Ben go to the Smoke monster in the first place? I don't get it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on March 11, 2010, 11:54:12 AM Ben's "judgment" was entirely a ploy by MIB. He (as Locke) told Ben to go down into the temple and be judged. The smoke monster appears (which is MIB) and takes the form of Alex in order to convince Ben to stop dickering around and just follow Locke (who is now MIB at that point). It was all part of MIB's plan to start working on Ben and get him ready to blindly kill Jacob.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 11, 2010, 12:06:07 PM Hmm I thought it was Ben's idea to do that.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: EWSpider on March 11, 2010, 12:23:39 PM Hmm I thought it was Ben's idea to do that. I couldn't remember either, but I found a clip that answers the question: http://www.cinemablend.com/celebrity/Ben-Gets-Judged-This-Week-On-Lost-16737.html It was Ben's idea, but I think MIB seized upon the opportunity to manipulate Ben. You can almost see the gears turning in Locke's head when Ben says he was coming back to the Island to be judged. Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on March 11, 2010, 01:53:51 PM I thought Ben didn't know that Lock wasn't really alive again until after killing Jacob.
*edit* i.e. He thought the island reincarnated Locke and didn't know Locke's real body was in the box. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on March 11, 2010, 02:15:09 PM Why didn't Ben know it wasn't Jacob in the cabin? The big ring of ash should have been a tip off :oh_i_see:
It seems like someone trapped him in there. Then, the first time Locke was taken there, MiB asks him to help him, presumable to break the ring so he could get out... which we see someone has done when Illana/Bram visited, but we still don't know by who. And if MiB was trapped in the cabin by the ring of ash - and MiB is Smokie and the apparitions people have seen - how were they able to roam about? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on March 11, 2010, 08:12:21 PM Get it together, you guys. I totally rely on you to make me feel as if I know what the fuck is going on.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 12, 2010, 01:06:44 PM Did anyone notice Ben's Dad's comment about how they should have never left the Island? never left the Dharma Initiative?
I found that interesting because so far this season I had the impression that the sunken island indicated in the flash-sidewise-world was real. It suggested that nothing on the Island had ever happened. But with this one remark it seems clear that one timeline did happen, but ended before Flight 815. Maybe up until when Ben was shot by Sayid? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 12, 2010, 01:09:56 PM Yes, I was wondering about that. I figure that in the sideways timeline the island sunk sometime after the Dharma days, or maybe at the time the bomb went off.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 12, 2010, 01:28:00 PM yup but the bomb was in the "past"
Anyways, I forgot why this was interesting.... The flash-sidewise narrative I thought was originally being presented as an "as if" the events on the Island never took place. Instead, it looks some of the narrative did happen. But also, the choices and events that happen to the main characters in the flash-sidewise seem to reflect or anticipate what's happening on the Island in the present. So for instance, Ben choosing Alex in the flash-sideways over power, Sayid killing in cold blood in flash-sideways and then going dark with Flocke. The events in the flash-sideways are revealing the true essence of the characters? It seems more than a dramatic device is what I'm getting at, like flash-sideways is alternate but equal world? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on March 12, 2010, 01:37:21 PM In the first episode of the season, when they show the island underwater, the camera swims by the darmha houses. So what ever happened, the divergent timeline started after the Darmha initiative. My guess is the same as Samwise, that it diverged at the point the nuke went off. In that timeline, Ben and his dad are one of the people evacuated off the island, along with Miles and his mom.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: ahoythematey on March 13, 2010, 02:58:58 AM Anybody else get a kick out of seeing Jackie Treehorn's thug playing Jacob?
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h292/ahoythematey/BlondTreehornThug.jpg) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 13, 2010, 08:34:40 PM Miles comment to Ben about Jacob's last thoughts really bothers me. Miles says Jacob was hoping he was wrong about Ben, but Jacob went out of his way to antagonize him right before Ben puts a knife into his chest: "What about you?" There's not much more of dick move. ANYTHING else could have probably turned Ben away from his course of action, but Jacob chose not to say one of those other things.
He was pushing for Ben to kill him as much as BlackLocke was. For a very very manipulative being, I don't think Jacob just tossed the words out there to test him. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 13, 2010, 08:37:42 PM Anybody else get a kick out of seeing Jackie Treehorn's thug playing Jacob? Or Rita's ex from 'Dexter'. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Hawkbit on March 14, 2010, 05:11:59 PM There's all kinds of weird things about the side timeline. Such as the fact that the whole reason that Locke decided to go on walkabout was because Abbadon told him about them when he was Locke's PT/nurse during recovery from the fall from the high-rise. It always made me wonder how he came up with the idea to walkabout if Abbadon hadn't have told him.... or if Abbadon was simply just a PT/nurse for his whole life in the side timeline.
Anyways, yeah. This is going to be a seriously interesting finale. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on March 15, 2010, 12:40:18 AM I think the finale is going to be a disappointment.
My guess is we're getting a glimpse of the finale every side-flash. Or maybe it will end with Hurley hosting a golf tournament, which would also be awesome. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 15, 2010, 11:25:39 AM Watching this program again convinces me that Hurley is one of the shows greatest inventions. He's not only consistently likeable, which is a feat since several of the show's heroes are pretty insufferable at times, he's a great tool for the writers. Hurley is the audience and not just comedy relief. He's the way the writers can speak directly to the audience in a way the show-don't-tell style of the program would otherwise avoid. He allows the writers to explain things in a direct way. It pushes the story along in a new way. They put the audience's questions in his mouth and he gets to ask about things we want to know. It's a great trick, particularly for a show that's all about obfuscation. I think without Hurley the show would've been a little more irritating and disappointing as it progressed, like Twin Peaks or the X-Files.
I mean, when they started time travelling he wanted to write the script for the Empire Strickes Back... Not Star Wars mind you, but Empire, "because it was the best film." Gold. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: ahoythematey on March 15, 2010, 01:30:12 PM Hurley definitely had the best lines in the series, particularly regarding his questions about Richard's agelessness. "So, are you, like, a terminator? A vampire?"
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 15, 2010, 06:12:35 PM When Hurley breaks down and finally confesses to his mother what actually went on while he was on the island, it was possibly one of the best and funniest recaps of the show.
Quote Okay… See, we did crash. But it was on this crazy island. I mean, we waited for rescue, and there wasn’t a rescue. And there was a smoke monster. And then there were other people on the island — we called them the Others, and they started attacking us. And we found some hatches and there was a button you had to push every 108 minutes or — well, I was never really clear on that — But the Others didn’t have anything to do with the hatches, that was the Dharma Initiative. They were all dead — the Others killed them. And now they’re trying to kill us. And then we teamed up with the Others because some worse people were coming on a freighter. Desmond’s girlfriend’s father sent them to kill us. So we stole their helicopter and we flew it to their freighter, but it blew up. And we couldn’t go back to the island because it disappeared. So then we crashed into the ocean, and we floated there for a while, until a boat came and picked us up. And by then there were six of us. That part was true. But the rest of the people who were on the plane…they’re still on that island. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Hawkbit on March 15, 2010, 06:23:29 PM I'm pretty sure that's the same ep that had his mom saying "Jesus is not a weapon!"... that had me in stitches. Likely the hardest I've laughed on this show ever.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 16, 2010, 10:42:32 AM my hope for the ending is Hurley is made God and left alone to golf and eat and stroll on the island in bliss with a handful of ghosts to talk with. But I fully expect to be disappointed with Jack and Sawyer taking over for Jacob and MrBlack.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 16, 2010, 10:45:23 AM As long as Kate dies, I'm happy.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 16, 2010, 11:47:23 AM my hope for the ending is Hurley is made God and left alone to golf and eat and stroll on the island in bliss with a handful of ghosts to talk with. But I fully expect to be disappointed with Jack and Sawyer taking over for Jacob and MrBlack. I agree with what you said. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on March 16, 2010, 04:57:26 PM my hope for the ending is Hurley is made God and left alone to golf and eat and stroll on the island in bliss with a handful of ghosts to talk with. But I fully expect to be disappointed with Jack and Sawyer taking over for Jacob and MrBlack. Watch it end up being some wacky combination like Sayid and Sun.Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on March 16, 2010, 07:56:39 PM I fully expect a Sun & Sun ending with happiness for all.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 16, 2010, 09:58:38 PM Well that was another setup episode while they wait for the OMG RICHARD!!!1 reveal.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 17, 2010, 07:27:47 AM Yeah, kind of a letdown after the last couple of episodes where things happened. I did love Sawyer and Miles as cop buddies though. That would be a great spinoff.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 17, 2010, 08:39:24 AM It was good. Things moved forward. The thing with Kate/Smokey/Clarie was a bit strange.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 17, 2010, 08:58:06 AM I did love Sawyer and Miles as cop buddies though. That would be a great spinoff. That was the best part, and got me thinking. If Sawyer becomes a cop instead of a criminal, it brings up a few questions: Since we know Jacob visiting the Young Sawyer after his parent's death in the timeline where he becomes a criminal, does that mean Jacob's intervention made him a criminal? If so, does his life as a cop mean that Jacob DID NOT intervene? And if that's true, did he not intervene because the island was gone? Or did he intervene in a different way? Miles mentioned his father being a professor at some museum, which leads me to believe that the doctor survived the nuclear explosion and got off the island (unless Miles meant a stepdad his mom told him was his real dad). Wasn't he right in the area where the blast occurred? If so, how did he make it off the island? And if he made it off, does that mean some of the main characters like Jack or Kate made it off as well, possibly leading to a second set of people living in the sideways timeline, like an Old Jack and a Young Jack? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 17, 2010, 11:49:02 AM It was a boring episode. Nothing happened. If next week's episode isn't brilliant and amazing, then there is no hope in saving it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 17, 2010, 05:35:48 PM I did love Sawyer and Miles as cop buddies though. That would be a great spinoff. That was the best part, and got me thinking. If Sawyer becomes a cop instead of a criminal, it brings up a few questions: Since we know Jacob visiting the Young Sawyer after his parent's death in the timeline where he becomes a criminal, does that mean Jacob's intervention made him a criminal? If so, does his life as a cop mean that Jacob DID NOT intervene? And if that's true, did he not intervene because the island was gone? Or did he intervene in a different way? Because Jacob is an evil douchebag who ruins everyone's life that he touches. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 17, 2010, 06:07:42 PM Yeah, it is striking how by and large everyone is much better off in the flash sideways. Although I don't know if I buy that it's because Jacob is gone and they're free to live their lives without interference, because they all keep conveniently running into each other.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 17, 2010, 09:17:19 PM We don't know that Jacob wasn't in their lives in the flash sideways - just that the island wasn't a part of their lives. They are still being drawn together in various ways.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 17, 2010, 10:25:09 PM We don't know that Jacob wasn't in their lives in the flash sideways - just that the island wasn't a part of their lives. They are still being drawn together in various ways. Hell, nobody believes Jacob is righteous anymore after Richard's meltdown in the shack. Jacob sucks. He's not the white knight. At best he's trying to save the world at all costs. At worst, he's the devil of the show (which is what I believe). Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 18, 2010, 12:40:53 AM Liked the episode, the flash sideways with the buddy cop routine was enjoyable, Charlotte was sufficiently hot, Kate was almost killed. Good times.
But how on earth does Sawyer think using a sub is easier than flying a plane? How many people would he have to force on gunpoint to do their job? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 18, 2010, 06:24:16 AM But how on earth does Sawyer think using a sub is easier than flying a plane? How many people would he have to force on gunpoint to do their job? That's what I said to my fiance. He thinks trying to submerge a sub is going to be easier than flying a large commercial plane? I would think both are impossible. Plus can just two people even operate a sub? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 18, 2010, 06:38:25 AM But how on earth does Sawyer think using a sub is easier than flying a plane? How many people would he have to force on gunpoint to do their job? That's what I said to my fiance. He thinks trying to submerge a sub is going to be easier than flying a large commercial plane? I would think both are impossible. Plus can just two people even operate a sub? Its a priviate sub, not a millitary one. Anyway, I am starting to long for the days where the dharma group was the mystery, I think the show peaked at the arch surrounding the hatch, and dharma. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 18, 2010, 06:39:52 AM Me too.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 18, 2010, 06:50:43 AM It was much more compelling then the current sessions tacked on feel. The show as a whole though, I still like.
I still dont think we know half of what we should about dharma. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on March 18, 2010, 07:46:58 AM Easy way to pilot sub: hold gun to sub pilot's head.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 18, 2010, 08:00:20 AM As I said earlier, how many people do you need for such a sub? How many of those will be fighting Lockes crew while Sawyer sneaks on the Sub during the fight (which is his stated plan).
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 18, 2010, 08:54:50 AM Who says Sawyer didn't learn a little about piloting a sub when he was in the security department with the Dharma Initiative in the '70s?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 18, 2010, 09:00:44 AM As I said earlier, how many people do you need for such a sub? How many of those will be fighting Lockes crew while Sawyer sneaks on the Sub during the fight (which is his stated plan). To make it move? One most likely. To navigate, repair, maintain, troubleshoot, and monitor tolerances? More than one. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 18, 2010, 11:16:58 AM The point of seasons past was that you need an exact course to go to and from the island. So navigating would be a good idea if that still is true.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 18, 2010, 12:11:41 PM so here's where we are with the season:
9 "Ab Aeterno" (“from the beginning of time”) >> Richard, reveal show (more about island history, less flash sidewise drama) 10 "The Package" >> Sun/Jin, transition show (like this week's with Sawyer, more sidewise drama)? 11 "Happily Ever After" >> Claire? reveal show (Christian, Flocke history) 12 "Everybody Loves Hugo" >> Hurley, transition show 13 "The Last Recruit" >> reveal 14 TBD 15 "Across the Sea" 16 TBD 17/18 TBD Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 23, 2010, 07:11:19 PM That was pretty good history stuff. I loved seeing Jacob and the Man in Black actually interact with normal dialogue.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 23, 2010, 07:35:33 PM Good episode, only complaint is that they didn't spend more time with Richard being on the island. It's a minor complaint though.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on March 23, 2010, 08:36:52 PM So the island is a cork for teh evil. Well, according to Jacob at least.
Great episode. Probably the 2nd best of the season. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 23, 2010, 09:18:51 PM So the island is a cork for teh evil. Well, according to Jacob at least. Great episode. Probably the 2nd best of the season. Still not buying it that Jacob's stopping the evil. They both just seem like two total assholes caught in a cycle they don't really want. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 23, 2010, 09:28:31 PM So the island is a cork for teh evil. Well, according to Jacob at least. Great episode. Probably the 2nd best of the season. Still not buying it that Jacob's stopping the evil. They both just seem like two total assholes caught in a cycle they don't really want. I think that's actually the point. Jacob isn't so much stopping the evil as stopping the corrupting influence of the Man in Black, the part of people's psyche that chooses to do bad things to get what they want regardless of the cost to other people. Jacob isn't a white knight, he's just the unlucky SOB who got stuck with the job of keeping this bigger asshole locked in prison. Prison guards can be real assholes until you compare them to the assholes they are guarding. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 23, 2010, 10:15:25 PM Cool episode. The thing with the island being the cork in the wine bottle of evil, and needing two people to maintain it... remind anyone else of the hatch?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on March 24, 2010, 12:30:06 AM "Now *that*, I can do." - Jacob
Interesting that MIB's instructions for killing Jacob are the same as Dogan's instructions for killing the MIB. The former ineffective due to Jacob beating the crap out of Richard, the latter (possibly) due to Sayid failing to stab him *before* he spoke (as instructed). Still loving season six. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on March 24, 2010, 05:06:09 AM Ben stabbed Jacob after he spoke however. So maybe the dagger just doesn't work on MiB and Dogan didn't know that. Or did, and just wanted to get Sayid killed.
edit: I recall a theory somewhere about a candidate having to stab them to kill them. Guess if Sayid stabbed MiB with the dagger now he would die. Richard apparently was brought to the island by Jacob as a candidate of some sort. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 24, 2010, 07:25:55 AM So who noticed that during the episode before it went to commercial that the cut screen didn't say "Lost" it was just a blank screen?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 24, 2010, 07:45:28 AM Also, I just read that the Captain of the Black Rock was named Hanso who's great grand son (or however many greats) was none other than the Hanso that started the Dharma Initiative. Apparently he had bought the Captains journal or something.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 24, 2010, 08:24:21 AM I'm getting a very Shadows/Vorlon from Babylon 5 feeling from the Jacob/MiB conflict. I like that.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Bokonon on March 24, 2010, 08:27:17 AM Heh, Big Lebowski thug got to reprise his toilet dunking scene ;)
I like the theory that I heard that Jacob/MiB are both jerks, but MiB is worse. Or that Jacob is the stereotypical brutal asshole prison guard. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 24, 2010, 08:58:07 AM My only issue is how the Island has become a back drop. All the interesting questions about the island don't seem to matter any more. The Island is just setting for Jacob and Smokey's slap fight.
If Smokey restrained(metaphysically) Jacob while Ben killed him then Sayid and Richard's attempts were doomed because they didn't have help to restrain their target. Smokey could never restrain and kill Jacob before because Jacob could always retreat to his statue. Smokey didn't send Richard to kill Jacob, but to get Richard into Jacob's employ. That way, Smokey could have an opportunity to trick Richard into giving Smokey and Ben an invite to the statue sometime later. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 24, 2010, 12:01:34 PM Saw a theory on the internets that the statue represents the Egyptian god Sobek (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobek).
Quote Sobek's ambiguous nature led some Egyptians to believe that he was a repairer of evil that had been done, rather than a force for good in itself, for example, going to Duat to restore damage done to the dead as a result of their form of death. He was also said to call on suitable gods and goddesses required for protecting people in situation, effectively having a more distant role, nudging things along, rather than taking an active part. Sound like anyone we know? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 24, 2010, 12:05:12 PM all I know is Hurley once again saves the day. Awwww yeah :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on March 24, 2010, 12:09:49 PM The statue is of Taweret. But I wouldn't doubt that Jacob is Sobek or something like that. What with Eqyptian references already all over the place.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on March 24, 2010, 12:15:34 PM Was it confirmed in the show itself that the statue is of Tawaret? It seems like that's the dominant theory based on the glimpses we've seen, but they don't actually look that different.
(edit) Okay, Abrams confirmed it in Wired (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taweret#In_popular_culture). Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on March 24, 2010, 12:28:41 PM Not sure if it was explicitly confirmed in the show. Producers did confirm it a couple times outside it.
Sobek also apparently has ties to Tawaret in Egyptian mythology. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on March 24, 2010, 01:23:46 PM Random thoughts. So if the island is the cork to keep back evil, almost sounds like it the island is basically the gate to hell (or something like it). That could tie in with the hatch and the energy that it was covering. When they bored into it, they inadvertently cracked the the seal over the evil/whatever. The nuke did something, and then they needed to keep hitting the buttons to maintain the seal. Thats why the world would end if they ever stopped hitting the buttons. It'd open the gates to hell/whatever.
Of course thats very similar to the plot of the Wheel of Time, so.... :why_so_serious: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on March 24, 2010, 03:25:19 PM I think this episode just reaffirms that the flash sideways are the ending, or better put, the character resolutions after whatever happens in the finale to cause history to change. The island being sunk at the season premier is symbolic of the cork being pushed all the way in.
My only issue is how the Island has become a back drop. All the interesting questions about the island don't seem to matter any more. Yes. It's annoying to watch - time and time again - people who were supposed to have so many secrets end up not knowing shit. It's past the point of just showing how they're pawns to the endgame. 143 years, and Richard hasn't divined out one damn nugget of information worth telling? I don't know if they're just being tight-lipped because they think it might ruin the ending or what, but they need to start making with the answers post haste. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on March 25, 2010, 07:54:18 AM It's basically about faith vs. reason
You don't need to know the answers if you have faith, you want all the answers if you lean to reason. People like real Locke, Ben, Richard and others never questioned Jacob because they had faith. Richard even thinks he is in Hell and knows a being that has granted him immortality so he doesn't need much to be faithful. Locke could walk again after crashing on the island so he didn't need much to be faithful. Season six is essentially a giant crisis of faith for every one. Richard, Ben and others are frustrated because they sacrificed so much for their faith but never gotten any gratitude for it never got redeemed and never got to an end of their service for Jacob. Ben even sacrificed his daughter for Jacobs cause (something God did not let Abraham do) They never needed answers because they had faith but now that their faith is waning they want them and are frustrated that they never got any. The followers of reason have their own crisis of faith with people like Jack realizing that more of their lives were influenced by some sort of demigod and not by their own decisions than they'd like. The man in black is capitalizing on that by drawing those people closer to him. The flash sideways in my opinion show some sort of "afterlife" with each life being better or worse depending on the person being more on the good or evil side of the equation as the end approaches. I don't even think that Jacob is there to keep the man in black from escaping but that the balance of good and evil on the island is necessary to keep the energy contained. If they were inspired by ancient mythology they would have acknowledged that for most of them good and evil needed to be in balance that either one couldn't exist without the other. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on March 25, 2010, 07:56:45 AM Its Vorlons vs Shadows, the Island Edition.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 25, 2010, 01:28:37 PM Season six is essentially a giant crisis of faith for every one. Richard, Ben and others are frustrated because they sacrificed so much for their faith but never gotten any gratitude for it never got redeemed and never got to an end of their service for Jacob. Ben even sacrificed his daughter for Jacobs cause (something God did not let Abraham do) Actually, I think Ben sacrificed all he did in the name of Jacob, but since he never saw Jacob, he was actually working for the Man in Black the whole time. Jacob has been gone from the cabin for a long time, IIRC, since before the plane crashed. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on March 25, 2010, 01:54:51 PM Probably NSFW.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on March 25, 2010, 01:55:16 PM Ya, the Others seemed committed to a cause that they knew nothing about. It's an gaping big plot hole given the extreme actions that the Others committed.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on March 25, 2010, 02:00:15 PM Season six is essentially a giant crisis of faith for every one. Richard, Ben and others are frustrated because they sacrificed so much for their faith but never gotten any gratitude for it never got redeemed and never got to an end of their service for Jacob. Ben even sacrificed his daughter for Jacobs cause (something God did not let Abraham do) Actually, I think Ben sacrificed all he did in the name of Jacob, but since he never saw Jacob, he was actually working for the Man in Black the whole time. Jacob has been gone from the cabin for a long time, IIRC, since before the plane crashed. Ben said he never talked to Jacob, and Richard should have known Jacob was at the statue, not the cabin. None of that make sense to me yet, and I'm not sure they really have an explanation for it. However, MiB has definitely been playing Ben for a looooong time. He was probably the one appearing as Ben's mother when he was a boy. He's behind the losties being sent back in time so Sayid would shank him. He's probably the reason why Ben got cancer. He let Roussaue live, so Ben would adopt Alex. He kept Michael from killing himself, helping bring Keamy to the island to off his daughter. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 26, 2010, 07:28:41 AM I think anytime we've seen a dead person on the island, it's been the Man in Black. Jacob seems to have no problem appearing as himself. Which leads one to ask if the visions Hurley saw of Dead Charlie were the Man in Black or Jacob, or something else entirely? He seems able to see dead people anywhere.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on March 26, 2010, 07:32:04 AM I think any dead people Hurley sees are actual dead people. Every other dead person the other people on the island have seen are likely the MiB. Last episode makes me think that. Unless it's really convoluted. Seemed to me that when Richard was talking with his dead wife through Hurley, the MiB was on his way to answer Richard, but got cockblocked due to Hurley and Richards dead wife.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on March 30, 2010, 07:05:47 PM The show is completely stalling at this point. I think they are showing all this alternate life crap because at some point the people will have to decide which life they really want. Locke gets off the island, and they get the alternate universe. Locke stays on the island and they have to guard him for all time.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on March 31, 2010, 08:59:56 AM Locke saying that all the people whose names are on the cave wall must leave reminds me of Farraday's mom saying that all the people who left must return. There's a balance to be maintained.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on March 31, 2010, 10:58:36 AM Interesting that MIB's instructions for killing Jacob are the same as Dogan's instructions for killing the MIB. I thought it was interesting that the MIB said something about Jacob stealing his body. I wonder if there's a chance that Jacob and MIB switched sides at one point. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on March 31, 2010, 04:26:33 PM I did like Whidmore's speech to Flocke, describing all the things he could be.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on April 06, 2010, 08:34:51 PM Phenomenal episode tonight.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on April 06, 2010, 09:26:21 PM Indeed.
They should have had this be the Desmond show for the last two seasons. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 06, 2010, 11:10:31 PM Agreed on both accounts. This was a great episode, but all Desmond episodes are great.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on April 07, 2010, 01:17:00 AM What strikes me as odd is that Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof are quite lucky when it comes to casting guest roles. Michael Emerson (Ben), Henry Ian Cusick (Desmond), the guy playing Eko, Elizabeth Mitchell (Juliet), Jeremy Davies (Daniel Faraday).
If only they were as lucky with the main cast. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on April 07, 2010, 06:11:51 AM I hate Faraday's character. I hate how he talks. It's so purposefully dramatic it irritates me.
(in a low and deep voice) No (pause) I don't want to set off a nuke (serious look and pause) Desmond. It's like he's channeling Shatner. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 07, 2010, 08:26:59 AM Well, I always got the impression he talked the way he did before because his brain had been fried in an experiment. He kept forgetting tons of things.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 07, 2010, 08:45:42 AM Yeah, I always thought the Farraday thing was a character thing, not an actor thing, but I haven't seen him in much else.
Love the Desmond episode, but I've always loved that character anyway. So if Eloise doesn't want Desmond to remember, and she was working with Ben Linus, who was mistakenly working for the Smoke Monster (though he thought he worked for Jacob), does that mean the sideways timeline is in fact the result of the Smoke Monster's machinations? That he not only needed to kill Jacob, but also destroy the island prison in order to escape? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on April 07, 2010, 01:39:09 PM I just think Eloise knows whats going on in both timelines. That's the impression I got.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on April 07, 2010, 04:50:20 PM I just think Eloise knows whats going on in both timelines. That's the impression I got. That's what I took away from it. Eloise in the other reality seemed to know more about what was going on than anyone else (Jacob and MiB aside). Being that she's the one at the Lamp Post she may have a handle on both (or all) possible realities. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on April 07, 2010, 05:03:24 PM She looked genuinely scared when she saw Desmond for the first time. She definitely knows more than she lets on
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 07, 2010, 05:55:00 PM To me it sounded like not only did she know about the alternate realities, she had a hand in setting this one up. The pointed way she told Desmond that he had everything he'd ever wanted suggested that this was in fact very deliberate.
Maybe the flash-sideways is the Matrix? :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 07, 2010, 06:27:22 PM To me it sounded like not only did she know about the alternate realities, she had a hand in setting this one up. The pointed way she told Desmond that he had everything he'd ever wanted suggested that this was in fact very deliberate. Maybe the flash-sideways is the Matrix? :awesome_for_real: I'm pretty sure they are hinting at that. It seems to be the life that went perfectly for everyone, but for the most part they are devoid of any real love. When they chase love, it fucks everything up. The exception seems to be Locke's alternate reality, but I think that's by design. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on April 08, 2010, 01:21:46 AM The alternate reality gives them what they want the most not what they actually need to be happy.
Eloise even told this to Desmond. Desmond gets the approval of Charles Widmore although he shouldn't care because his Wife doesn't and is much more important to his life (being his constant and all). Charlie got the Driveshaft reunion at Widmore's charity event but knew he'd need to be with Claire Locke got his Wife and the approval of his father but sacrificed his "don't tell me what I can't do" attitude that made him a chosen one. Sawyer got a life where he didn't kill the innocent man in Australia but never met Juliet. Kate managed to escape the Marshal but is still on the run (and doesn't meet either Jack, Sawyer or gets to raise Aaron). Nadia is still alive but has married Sayid's brother Eloise didn't shoot her own son Raising and loving Aaron gave Kate purpose Being with Juliet gave Sawyer purpose The love of Penny gave Desmond purpose Meeting Claire gave Charlie purpose etc. It kind of makes sense. It's kind of like a twisted take on paradise. People got what they wanted but not what they needed. I also assume that Eloise made a deal with the devil to get the life she always wanted because she definitely knows that this reality is not really real. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on April 08, 2010, 08:07:29 AM She could be MiB's crazy mother. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 08, 2010, 08:31:24 AM If what you're saying is true, JK, the sideways reality is hell. But what about Jack and Hurley? Seems like they've both got pretty good lives.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 08, 2010, 02:18:32 PM She could be MiB's crazy mother. :awesome_for_real: Except we've seen her age. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on April 08, 2010, 06:07:20 PM But, her younger. Rawr.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 08, 2010, 06:19:33 PM If what you're saying is true, JK, the sideways reality is hell. But what about Jack and Hurley? Seems like they've both got pretty good lives. We don't know that really. Also, I think sideways reality might be hell. I think letting the MiB off the island is what makes all that shit actually turn out to be true. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 08, 2010, 06:22:07 PM Pretty mild hell.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on April 08, 2010, 06:26:16 PM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on April 08, 2010, 06:48:15 PM Kate's still alive... that should be hell enough for everyone.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on April 08, 2010, 08:48:24 PM Kate's still alive... that should be hell enough for everyone. Oh don't worry, it's been hinted that will be taken care of soon enough. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 09, 2010, 05:44:13 PM Pretty mild hell. It's the best I can pull out of this half-cock-blocked writing. My real guess is the ending is going to be something blatantly stupid that was never remotely hinted at, but they can probably put together 30s montage of "OMG HOW DID YOU MISS IT..." amongst the 50 hours of character crap you mentally checked out of. Then, when they ask the writers, they will tell us it wasn't about the destination, it was about the journey. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on April 09, 2010, 06:52:10 PM As long as Hugo and Desmond live I'll be happy.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 09, 2010, 06:52:56 PM Luckily this isn't a Joss Whedon show, so they'll probably be okay.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on April 10, 2010, 11:55:47 PM Found this little gem on YouTube last night. This and other related vids had me in stitches for about 20 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLyfgvByE7Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLyfgvByE7Q) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 13, 2010, 06:13:56 PM Kablooey :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 13, 2010, 06:43:55 PM Kablooey :awesome_for_real: About time. Freaking know-it-all nag. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 13, 2010, 10:43:53 PM Kablooey :awesome_for_real: About time. Freaking know-it-all nag. Anyways, great episode, especially the end. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 14, 2010, 12:14:48 AM I think tonight's episode pretty strongly validated the theory that Locke in the sideways timeline is the smoke monster.
Either that or Desmond was confused and has just made a somewhat tragic blunder. :ye_gods: Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 14, 2010, 11:48:04 AM Desmond just hates cripples. :why_so_serious:
I'm loving the new, calm Jesus Desmond. Either Locke in the sideways timeline is the Smoke Monster and Desmond knows it, or Desmond is trying to get Locke to see the fallacy of the sideways timeline by the vehicular version of the zen slap. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 14, 2010, 11:51:36 AM Maybe Desmond can see between the realities at the same time now, and just wanted revenge. Throw me down a well will you? Eat my fender asshole!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 14, 2010, 11:53:40 AM OOH... or maybe he's trying to put Locke in the hospital so Jack will work on him?
If he'd wanted to kill him, hitting him with a sedan is far from the most surefire way. Okay, I take back my smoke monster comment. Title: Re: Lost Post by: stark on April 14, 2010, 11:54:22 AM I don't know why, but this cracks me up (http://cdn.videogum.com/files/2010/04/libby_kiss.jpg) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 14, 2010, 12:06:37 PM Oh my god, that's a brilliant summation of this episode.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 14, 2010, 12:07:41 PM Le awesome.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on April 14, 2010, 12:45:31 PM My initial response to Desmond running over Locke is that once Locke dies in the alt-timeline he will comeback to the island timeline and push out the smoke monster.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 14, 2010, 12:59:13 PM Desmond is fucking rich, though. He can't hire a guy to just pop him? Or buy a gun and do it himself?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on April 14, 2010, 02:00:18 PM My first thought was Desmond was putting things in the sideways timeline "the way they should be" when he hit Locke.
But then I remembered he didn't go murdering Libby. So lol, I dunno. The forcing him to see Jack thing seem the most likely at this point. Followed closely by him seeing both timelines and not knowing Locke is the smoke monster, but knowing Locke pushed him down a well. So fuck that guy. Run his ass over. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 16, 2010, 11:43:47 AM Maybe Desmond can see between the realities at the same time now, and just wanted revenge. Throw me down a well will you? Eat my fender asshole! This. Because of the recent box of magnets encounter, I think he got a cross pollination update. We already knew Desmond seems to not be beholden to the laws of time and space. Poor guy, got dragged right back to the dam island. It's the best I can pull out of this half-cock-blocked writing. My real guess is the ending is going to be something blatantly stupid that was never remotely hinted at, You just described the entire last season. There is close to nothing in this season that has jack all to do with the first. Its been like a bad Stephen king novel, but I'm still watching because I need closure. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 18, 2010, 08:39:54 AM My other fear is that it's something obvious we all guessed back in season 2, but the writers came out and vehemently said, "No it's not that."
"But wait yeah it really was, lulz." :uhrr: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 21, 2010, 10:04:52 AM OOH... or maybe he's trying to put Locke in the hospital so Jack will work on him? :drill: Interesting how quickly all the islanders are converging in the flash sideways, and not solely by Desmond's doing, although he's certainly helping. Anyone else finding it somewhat unrealistic how quickly Jack and his kid have gone from zero to best buds? Did I miss an 80's montage somewhere? Not much happened in the main timeline this episode. Blah. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 21, 2010, 10:25:12 AM Not much? EH? Jack essentially makes the choice that will make him the next Jacob (or at least he believes it will make him the next Jacob) and Widmore decides to waste the entire group of candidates who make it to the island so as to ensure Flocke can't leave? And Sayeed wakes up and goes against Flocke instead of killing Desmond? I'd say those were pretty big, though it certainly might not have seemed it.
Sun's screaming that "IT'S HIM!" when she saw Locke tells me the sideways Locke really is the smoke monster escape vessel, or at least they are certainly positioning it that way. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 21, 2010, 10:42:12 AM Eh, we already knew Jack was lined up to be the next Jacob, and we already knew Widmore is unscrupulous and that he wants to keep Smokey on the island. Sayid going against Smokey was something, but we haven't seen any real ramifications from it yet.
Really, the biggest thing was the implication that Jack has now been recruited by Smokey (the episode title is "The Last Recruit"). But we've already seen from Claire and Sayid's minor betrayals that becoming a "recruit" isn't as big a deal as we thought it was (i.e. it's not an irreversible change). Sun saying "it's him" could mean goddamn anything. She could be recognizing him as Locke, or she could be recognizing him as Smokey. Either could plausibly elicit that reaction from her. And she could be wrong either way. We don't know how much of her memory she has. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jobu on April 22, 2010, 11:26:06 PM Everyone keeps saying to prevent the "man in black" from leaving the island.
Note Sayid and Jack both wear much blacker shirts than Locke does. Just thought it was curious. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 22, 2010, 11:42:41 PM :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on April 23, 2010, 01:45:25 AM I don't think that alignments are as clear cut as any one thinks they are.
Up to now nobody has convinced me yet that Jacob is actually good or that Esau/Flocke/Smoke Monster is actually evil. A lot of people claim that it that is exactly the case but like with any real god/half-god a lot of shit gets attributed to either Jacob or his opponent without any one of them actually aknowledging that they did or didn't do it. Two thoughts. 1. Where are Smoke Monsters others? Jacob has gathered quite a following over the centuries shouldn't his opponent have a similar posse already? I suppose he has but since they are not a visible faction they must be part of other groups which makes anything anybody has said questionable at best. 2. I still think Juliet's last words "it worked" have some meaning. Philosophical speaking good or bad are attributes that people have given to either Jacob or his opponent. I don't think that either of them thinks in such categories. Like Zeus and Hades or Thor and Loki they are immersed in their own little game without regard for their human chesspieces. Right now I wouldn't want either of them to win because I truts neither. Both have done despicable things to the Islanders and manipulated them into doing their bidding while either one claims to be good and right. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on April 23, 2010, 01:55:30 AM So, throwing Desmond down a well and ordering somebody to kill him is not evil?
Neither is telling a mentally unstable person to "go ahead and kill Kate when I don't need her anymore"? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on April 23, 2010, 02:48:15 AM Have you even read the Bible ?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on April 23, 2010, 03:00:15 AM Sadly, I have more often than I should have. And Old Testament God was an asshole and likely evil.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on April 23, 2010, 04:08:54 AM Needs of the Many, bitchfist.
:awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on April 23, 2010, 04:18:09 AM I would say fuck the Many, but thats what got Sodom obliterated! :why_so_serious:
Before we are completely off-topic here. I kind of see Jacob as being able to pull the "For the Greater Good" excuse if he really tries, but Smokemonster kills too freely and without reason to try that defense. Personally I can see it working better as a "Shadows vs Vorlons" thing, but if they choose the "Good vs Evil" axis, Smokemonster is too bloodthirsty to be good. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Jeff Kelly on April 23, 2010, 06:06:51 AM I agree. Yet I don't really see Jacob as being "Good" either.
I don't even think that "Good" vs. "Evil" is the right dynamic here. The point I was trying to make is that the "Good" vs. "Evil" dynamic is something the humans on and off the island attributed to their respective deity/enemy. Tebonas, I think your mentioning of the old testament is spot on. The god of the israelites cared for his followers but was vengeful if his commandmends were not heeded or if you happened to believe in somebody else. Join or die. Either you believe in me and obey my every command or I will direct my wrath on to you. In the point of view of the Egyptians or everybody else he would surely be perceived as evil. Vice versa every other deity must have been seen by the israelites as evil and most other pantheons smote unbelievers in a similar fashion at least if you believe the respective mythologies. :why_so_serious: Jacob and his counterpart are both missionaric in nature (they try to aquire followers and convince unbelievers to join their cause) both harbour their own agenda that is until now totally unclear to their followers, both are manipulative bastards that require blind devotion and sacrifices from their followers. I can't even decide if murdering people (or manipulating your followers into killing) is really so much worse than manipulating the lives of your prospective followers in such a way that they have to end up on your island so that you can use them in your own little game of battle chess. The others have done their own fair share of killing with the purging of the Dharma Initiative and by killing and manipulating the oceanic survivors. Both Jacob and Esau employ different means to advance their own plan with Jacob being less overtly evil which might be construed as "good" (for certain values of good) but I don't buy the "good" vs. "evil" schtick, even if it might be exactly what the Lost producers are going for. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on April 23, 2010, 06:12:14 AM Yeah, this is a shades of grey discussion.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 23, 2010, 06:15:01 AM Gosh, now that you bring it up, it was Jacobs boy that got Ben to wipe out the initiative wasn't it. (Richard)
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Reg on April 23, 2010, 08:25:24 AM That seems fairly evil. The Dharma initiative didn't seem like such bad people. Still, there was a time travel loop involved there. Jacob's hands may have been tied in order to get the candidates back where they belong.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 23, 2010, 08:56:19 AM Remember when the Others took Ben and healed him, and said he'd be "different" afterward? And you know how Sayid has been since they "healed" him? I'm pretty sure there's a connection there. We've also seen cases where the Others have apparently worked with or controlled the smoke monster. And there was that casual throwaway line at the cabin of "Jacob hasn't lived there in a long time," which might suggest that Ben was mistaken about who and what and where Jacob was all along.
Which is to say, I'm not convinced that everything the Others do is representative of Jacob. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 23, 2010, 09:12:30 AM Yeah, last episode they finally admitted smoke monster had been running around the island pretending to look like other people to fuck with the survivors all this time. I'm sure he was pretending to be Jacob to fuck with Ben as well. He's been playing the very very long con on all this to get off the island.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 23, 2010, 09:54:58 AM But he couldn't have been pretending to be Jacob all this time, since Jacob wasn't dead yet. Right?
OTOH Ben had never seen Jacob, or so he claimed, so Smokey wouldn't have had to look like him to fool Ben. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on April 23, 2010, 11:52:37 AM I'm pretty sure Smokey has impersonated Jacob a shitton of times. By the time he was killed, it seemed like Jacob had retreated to the statue of Anubis.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 23, 2010, 01:56:42 PM But he couldn't have been pretending to be Jacob all this time, since Jacob wasn't dead yet. Right? Yeah, thats what I think. He didn't make himself look like the actual Jacob to fool people, since only a few knew wtf Jacob actually looked like.OTOH Ben had never seen Jacob, or so he claimed, so Smokey wouldn't have had to look like him to fool Ben. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on April 23, 2010, 01:59:45 PM But he couldn't have been pretending to be Jacob all this time, since Jacob wasn't dead yet. Right? Yeah, thats what I think. He didn't make himself look like the actual Jacob to fool people, since only a few knew wtf Jacob actually looked like.OTOH Ben had never seen Jacob, or so he claimed, so Smokey wouldn't have had to look like him to fool Ben. Richard should have known. Richard was supposed to be his go-between, so why didn't he take Locke to see Jacob? I think some of these inconsistencies are just from them changing their minds mid-story. Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on April 23, 2010, 09:42:04 PM But he couldn't have been pretending to be Jacob all this time, since Jacob wasn't dead yet. Right? Yeah, thats what I think. He didn't make himself look like the actual Jacob to fool people, since only a few knew wtf Jacob actually looked like.OTOH Ben had never seen Jacob, or so he claimed, so Smokey wouldn't have had to look like him to fool Ben. Maybe Smokey has been playing Jacob the whole time and the real Jacob is that little boy we keep seeing. ::mind,blown:: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Sir T on April 25, 2010, 11:25:56 AM This is sounding more and more like the plot of star trek V :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on April 25, 2010, 11:30:55 AM This is sounding more and more like the plot of star trek V :why_so_serious: What does the devil need with a 737? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 26, 2010, 10:33:55 AM I am ireked that any of the survivors actually think the plane is a viable way to get off the island. Even if it hadn't crashed and was still in perfect condition, theres no fucking way they'd be able to get a 737 off the ground without an actual runway.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on April 26, 2010, 11:26:19 AM Especially with a living, relatively sane and cogent pilot in their midst who could pipe in at any time to knock them out of their fantasy, but he doesn't.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 26, 2010, 11:35:01 AM Wait, who among the survivors thinks they're going to use the plane to escape? I thought that was Smokey's plan (or at least the plan he sold his group). Frank's with Sawyer, who was planning on using the sub.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 26, 2010, 11:57:47 AM Yeah, sawyer wants the sub.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on April 26, 2010, 12:30:47 PM Yeah, I'm just saying that on the surface, everybody still acts like thats viable (even the other guys running around with locke). In reality, if smoky said, "Hey, theres a crashed 737 on a beach over there. We can just fly it off the island!", everybody would just stare at him like he's retarded.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on April 26, 2010, 12:44:22 PM The Others built a runway over on Hydra Island. Kate was forced to work on it when she was in captivity in Season 3. The plane actually landed on it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on April 26, 2010, 02:51:14 PM It was only a runway in the sense that it prevented the plane from erupting into a fireball the moment it hit the ground.
Quote from: Samwise Wait, who among the survivors thinks they're going to use the plane to escape? I thought that was Smokey's plan (or at least the plan he sold his group). Frank's with Sawyer, who was planning on using the sub. True, but the main reason for them to use the sub is for diversionary purposes, not because they think the plane itself isn't viable. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 26, 2010, 04:07:19 PM The Others built a runway over on Hydra Island. Hey, is there any chance that the runway construction was done at Smokey's direction as part of his master plan? Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 26, 2010, 06:30:14 PM The Others built a runway over on Hydra Island. Hey, is there any chance that the runway construction was done at Smokey's direction as part of his master plan? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on April 26, 2010, 06:45:36 PM I don't really care whether the writers had everything planned out ahead of time as long as the final product is an entertaining story. And it's been entertaining so far, so I ain't complaining yet.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on April 26, 2010, 07:06:18 PM I am sure the ending will be good, but some of this continuity just bugs me. And the Stupidity of the Others is the top. Remember when the biggest question of Lost was "Who were these bad-ass jungle Ninja stalking the survivors?". The answer "The biggest chumps to ever walk the Face of Earth" is hardly satisfying. I understand writers did it to preserve the mystery, but it just doesn't make any sense.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on April 26, 2010, 07:44:58 PM Remember when Walt was important?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on April 26, 2010, 08:33:42 PM Remember when Walt was important? He was an alright child actor, but then he grew up and became a poor adult actor. I'm guessing they stopped having him be "important" because of that. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on April 27, 2010, 12:38:59 AM The Others built a runway over on Hydra Island. Kate was forced to work on it when she was in captivity in Season 3. The plane actually landed on it. Alaska Airlines used to land 737's on gravel runways. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on April 27, 2010, 01:06:56 AM http://twitpic.com/1h6mox
http://twitpic.com/1h6kxc http://twitpic.com/1h6iw0 I find this guy's little lost comics amusing. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rendakor on April 27, 2010, 01:25:17 AM http://twitpic.com/1h6mox I really did think that was going to happen; I was wincing and yelling "No, stop you idiots!" at the TV and everything.Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 04, 2010, 07:35:23 PM Well, that's 3 down in one episode. :grin:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on May 04, 2010, 07:37:56 PM You missed one.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 04, 2010, 07:47:24 PM Goddamn fucking cockroach characters.. Grr.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Triforcer on May 04, 2010, 08:50:14 PM EDIT: I have it on good authority that the ending will be this, starting about 3:20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D33B6Y7JaKk Seriously, who thinks that is totally off the table? I don't. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 04, 2010, 09:10:46 PM You missed one. Technically, so did those on the beach at the end of the episode. Poor guy. No one cares. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 04, 2010, 10:15:43 PM :ye_gods:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 05, 2010, 04:34:23 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 05, 2010, 07:38:37 AM Loved the episode, but had to put aside a lot of "Wait, why didn't they..." questions for it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 05, 2010, 09:05:28 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on May 05, 2010, 02:41:23 PM That's not a spoiler, it's wishful thinking! Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 05, 2010, 03:47:00 PM Sorry, I can't hear you over the wishrays emminating from my cranium.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 05, 2010, 10:50:15 PM :ye_gods:
Yeah, we know the ending is going to consist of everybody dieing except one. The only people worth saving from the island are dead now. Though, on that note, I'll burn with the rage of a thousand suns if Desmond doesn't live. Maybe him and Miles can make it. Everybody else is dead for sure now (with Jack being the most obvious choice as the one, but I think they could really misdirect us on that). Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 05, 2010, 11:27:19 PM Huh? Hurley is pretty much the only one I'd be upset with dying. Rest of them seem to want to die anyhow. At least with their actions.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 05, 2010, 11:34:41 PM Prepare yourself then, that will be exactly the reason why he will day. They will think the emotional impact is worth it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 06, 2010, 11:55:08 AM Well yes, Hurley is still cool. But still, the Kwans had a 3 year old daughter back home, loving nottotallyfuckedup relationship (unlike pretty much everybody else on the show), good characters.... they were the ones left who had the most going for them to actually make it back home. With them being killed, there's no fucking way anybody else "on the list" is going to get off the island. There will be the new Jacob, and everybody else dead. Hopefully non-list people may have a chance (again, I'll rage if Desmond doesn't make it), but Miles chances are pretty slim now that he's the only remaining "new guy" not to die.
I can't wait for them to kill Claire. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 06, 2010, 12:25:37 PM I can't wait for them to kill Claire. As long as it's during a cat fight with Kate in a mud pit, I'm down. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 06, 2010, 02:53:46 PM this is all feeling rushed
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 07, 2010, 06:50:45 AM this is all feeling rushed I agree. I was just talking to a buddy of mine last night about this. The first few seasons were all about a bunch of survivors coming across weird shit. They would occasionally walk across this huge mysterious island, often getting lost, and discovering more and more things that weren't right. Now they are running all over the place in the space of a day and quickly converging to an end. I think it's been like 2 days since they plopped back in modern time right? The pacing of the story is all off. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Miguel on May 07, 2010, 02:47:58 PM Not sure if this was discussed already....but according to Lostpedia the names in the cave were:
4 – Locke 8 – Reyes 15 – Ford 16 – Jarrah 23 – Shephard 42 – Kwon What if #23 is referring to Claire and not Jack? Aren't they technically both Shephard's? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 07, 2010, 03:04:38 PM Claire's last name is Littleton. Finding out that you share a biological father does not retroactively change your name. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 07, 2010, 10:43:16 PM Kwon is still alive because their kid is alive :oh_i_see:
Also Kwon is the next Jacob, because she conceived on the island. :why_so_serious: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 07, 2010, 11:12:04 PM If the kid was a candidate, I'm pretty sure she would have had to come to the island with all the others, no?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 08, 2010, 02:35:30 AM If the kid was a candidate, I'm pretty sure she would have had to come to the island with all the others, no? And considering they have 3 episodes left to somehow magically get her to the island and declare her the new Jacob....NO. Even if they did pull it off somehow everybody would declare it the worst Deus Ex ever and revolt. I mean, the idea itself is actually pretty neat, but only if they had started with that to begin with (IE, bringing the child to the island somehow). There's no way they could pull off that idea at this point.Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on May 09, 2010, 11:03:37 PM I'm soooo confused why smokey didn't kill them all before?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 09, 2010, 11:40:58 PM Smokey can't kill them himself. Its in the rules that he has to follow for whatever reasons. So he has to bring them to killing each other instead. I suspect thats why he didn't kill Eko the first time. He was still a candidate.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 10, 2010, 12:12:04 AM Yeah, they said it in that episode, Smokey can't kill any of the candidates. If they had just let the bomb count to zero, it wouldn't have gone off, like jack said. It required Sawyer trying to defuse it and thus starting off another timer to cause it to go off. I'm assuming that's the reason they're going to use as to why Smokey always chased but never really killed any of the survivors.
Of course, that does mean its going to be pretty hard for him to finish the rest off, now that his carefully laid plans only succeed in killing half of them. Perhaps at the end he'll try to kill them, thus breaking the rules, and get bitch slapped by the island/mystery kid in the process. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 10, 2010, 12:15:25 AM He still has Claire to do the dirty work for him.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 10, 2010, 12:19:58 AM He left her at the dock as the strode confidently into the jungle with his gun. :awesome_for_real:
But yeah, your right, that's probably how they'll try to get around it. Which is how Claire will inevitably be killed, thank god. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 10, 2010, 09:33:30 AM doesn't anyone else find it ODD that a monster of smoke and evil can fashion such cool explosives?
and with really intricate timers from the back of a digital watch Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 10, 2010, 09:47:01 AM Well it is a pretty evil thing to be able to do. I just assumed it went with his territory. Being the smoke monster of evil and doom and all.
e: spelling Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 10, 2010, 09:50:28 AM After everything else you've seen him able to do, you consider it odd that he knows how to make a bomb?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 10, 2010, 11:58:56 AM it's odd that he knows all the technical skills he has, yes. Particularly if he's some ancient Egyptian god. Just waiting on the reveal at this point.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 10, 2010, 12:04:14 PM He took the bomb from the plane, didn't he? I presumed either Widmore or Ben/Miles/Richard placed the explosives and Smokey just re-purposed them. Setting a timer on an already existing bomb shouldn't be that difficult.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on May 10, 2010, 12:37:56 PM He's also been shown to read minds, so he could have lifted the know-how from some demolitions expert guy he ran across.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Obo on May 10, 2010, 01:17:54 PM Also clearly a terrorist! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_detainees_accused_of_possessing_Casio_F91W_watches)
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on May 10, 2010, 04:42:21 PM Holy SHIT! I had one of those.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 10, 2010, 05:15:38 PM Me too, but now I'll probably wind up on some terrorist watch list.
Tee hee. Watch list. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 11, 2010, 08:32:43 PM Sooo...
Jacob strikes me as whiny now. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 11, 2010, 09:11:25 PM This episode now makes me retroactively hate the entire series that I've been defending for years.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 11, 2010, 11:18:22 PM Err, how so? I thought it was pretty good.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 12, 2010, 01:03:08 AM huh.
I'm just not sure how useful it was -- it's almost like it simultaneously explained too much (sometimes it's best for things to just be a mystery) and didn't tell us much that we didn't already know. We met another mysterious person who seems less than truthful behind our existing mysterious less than truthful people. I didn't hate it, but it kinda leaves my scratching my head. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 12, 2010, 02:18:27 AM Anyone know if Hulu will let me watch Lost from the UK?
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ironwood on May 12, 2010, 02:21:22 AM Remember we're one behind. Grab Sky at the right time and you'll see it normally. :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 12, 2010, 02:26:10 AM One more episode left. I get this feeling it's going to end like BSG did at this point. Leaving me with a case of "wtf, seriously?"
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 12, 2010, 03:03:22 AM I just took a walk after watching the last episode and it dawned on me.
Lost. I get it now. All this time I thought the title of the show was referring to the people on the island being lost. It's the writers. They are the ones who are lost. The entire show has been about the writer trying to find the plot. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 12, 2010, 03:17:25 AM Remember we're one behind. Grab Sky at the right time and you'll see it normally. :why_so_serious: Yeah, I tuned in last night and saw last week's episode. Again. If Hulu and abc.com are uncooperative maybe I'll just torrent it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 12, 2010, 07:33:50 AM So let me try to explain it. I liked the episode.
I like how they managed to tell a story that could have pissed off the religious without pissing off the religious. Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on May 12, 2010, 08:46:57 AM I am more and more convinced that nobody in the show has any real clue what is going on. Every time we see more about people who we think know whats going on we find they don't have any better clue than anybody else.
I was hoping the ending couple episodes would have some answers but frankly I no longer believe there are any answers to be had. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Hawkbit on May 12, 2010, 08:59:32 AM Haemish hit the nail on the head. I have a different ending in mind, but yeah.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on May 12, 2010, 09:22:01 AM Haemish hit the nail on the head. I have a different ending in mind, but yeah. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 12, 2010, 10:57:55 AM I dunno. I don't feel we needed to have a material explanation for MIB or Jacob. What was offered makes me kind of disappointed.
I don't see how that episode really helped move the narrative forward. I'm now irked they spent so many episodes and scenes with character bios, since the main characters ultimately have no real connection to the Island. Or if they do their lives weren't shown to be that connected (other than the one Jacob meeting with each of them). It's making me feel this is going to have another X-Files and Twin Peaks like ending -- rushed, and with loose ends, but not loose ends that offer speculation, but just plot dead ends. Stuff that got forgotten or ignored. For instance, I don't really need to know what makes the Island special -- it just is. I don't need to know what Jacob is other than he is something special. I'd rather know why the main characters are special since I've been watching them for SIX YEARS. Not explaining that sufficiently is going to really bug me. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 12, 2010, 11:03:20 AM Now I know what was in the briefcase in Pulp Fiction.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 12, 2010, 11:55:24 AM I dunno. I don't feel we needed to have a material explanation for MIB or Jacob. What was offered makes me kind of disappointed. ... For instance, I don't really need to know what makes the Island special -- it just is. I don't need to know what Jacob is other than he is something special. I'd rather know why the main characters are special since I've been watching them for SIX YEARS. Not explaining that sufficiently is going to really bug me. I totally agree with this -- I think they screwed up by explaining "too much" which just resulted in more questions. I would have been happy with "Jacob and his friend have lived on the island forever subject to mysterious rules and had a wager about the corruptibility of humanity" as the backstory, and then sort out what happens to our castaways in that light. Explaining that Jacob and his brother got stuck in that role by their crazy (evil? misguided? who knows!) adoptive mother doesn't actually make much difference, but now raises more (unlikely to be answered) questions and takes time away from what does this mean for the main characters. Title: Re: Lost Post by: croaker69 on May 12, 2010, 12:52:56 PM Who destroyed the village of MiB's people and how? I took it as crazy fake mom (CFM?) due to MiB's murdering her for it. If so can she take the smoke form due to going into the light and just not mentioning it?
How did the ghost of the twin's true mother manifest? Was it really her or CFM as smoke monster again. CFM was a weaver as was Jacob after her. Perhaps she created this whole pattern by manipulating Jacob and his twin. I think Smokey is still the brother just with a new power. There's too much of his personality still there in Locke. He's obsessed with leaving the island, thinks people really suck, and gets things done by lies and manipulation. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 12, 2010, 01:58:00 PM After wasting so much time watching this, I'll just be happy if they just explain what the whole deal with Starbuck was.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on May 12, 2010, 03:18:57 PM I've been pretty patient about this whole thing until this episode. I mean, I've watched six years worth of shows where EVERY question was answered with two more questions, but it never felt like it was a "yeah, we don't know what's happening either" from the writers. Until now. Fuck's sake, guys. There's what, two more episodes until the end, and you're STILL introducing new, "important" characters who are just as untrustworthy and mysterious in their motives as everyone else. Enigmatic liars who, when asked direct questions about what's going on, twaddle about and prevaricate like it's still the first season and they want to save it for a big reveal later on.
I also agree with Quinton about how they seem to be answering too much and not enough at the same time. Another annoyance that's been bothering me for a while is the overall attitude of the Others. From the very beginning, they have been the world's most amazing assholes who, when given a choice between helping someone in need and being a complete cock to them, invariably choose the latter. The closest thing to "good" they seem capable of doing, is uttering the phrase, "we're the good guys." Again, I've been pretty patient over the course of the show, thinking that eventually, it will be revealed why they behave the way they do. The only answer forthcoming seems to be Ranting aside, I still love this show. It's just that some events in the final stretch are frustrating, and I'm still afraid they might pull a variant of The Sopranos or BSG. Title: Re: Lost Post by: palmer_eldritch on May 12, 2010, 03:54:12 PM So let me try to explain it. I liked the episode. I like how they managed to tell a story that could have pissed off the religious without pissing off the religious. I think you explained the episode pretty well but it also (the show's story, not your explanation) amounts to nothing much. It's not a show about anything that relates to real people, it's about some invented mythology that there's no reason for any of us to care about. I'm still interested in characters like Desmond and Hurley and where they end up, as well as alternative reaility Locke if he shows up again, so there's that to look forward to. Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 12, 2010, 06:49:51 PM Just watched it so I'll throw my spoiler'd 2 pennies in:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on May 12, 2010, 08:56:42 PM One more episode left. I get this feeling it's going to end like BSG did at this point. Leaving me with a case of "wtf, seriously?" There are 2 episodes left, with the 2nd episode being 2 and a half hours fyi (according to wikipedia) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 12, 2010, 10:45:56 PM Technically, there are 3 episodes left. 1 next week, and 2 in a row on the Sunday of the following week (just like BSG. I'm really getting nervous about the parallels between the two series at this point :why_so_serious:).
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 13, 2010, 04:05:07 AM Well that's cool. Makes it slightly better. I was under the impression this was a 16 episode season for whatever reason. Think it started as a 16 episode season when it first aired, they must have expanded it at some point and I just never followed. Makes last episode slightly more forgivable, but not by much. Too many new questions too late in the game.
And the everyone who seems to know something knows nothing syndrome is getting abit much. I loved it in I think it was the 3rd of 4th season when Ben started playing a much larger role and was first leaning towards the side of good, when it seemed he knew alot. Was disappointed when he turned out to know NOTHING. Then following that, everyone else who seemed to know something, knew nothing. And now we've been told Jacob, also knows nothing. Can't help but feel the writers know nothing as well. Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on May 13, 2010, 07:22:00 AM I agree with raydeen that the compelling part of the show was fundamentally a metaphysical mystery.
Whether HaemishM's or raydeens speculations end up closer to the reveal, I can't really say. But, I will say categorically that the show will be a complete failure if they do not resolve the mystery one way or another... they can say the answer is Aliens, God, Forgotten Gods, Ancient Tech, Atlanteans or 42; but an answer there must be. A mystery cannot be answered with a mystery and be considered a good mystery. A soap-opera can go from mystery to mystery to mystery because there really is no point to a soap-opera. But Lost has traded on the cache of being something more than a soap-opera. The previous episode might have worked as the 2nd episode of the final season... effectively setting the table for answering all (many) of the open questions of the island; but to introduce as Vaiti says a whole crew of new Know-nothings in positions of supreme power right before the finale? bleh, nothing but incompetence. Whatever they reveal, it is clear to me that it will be purely on an emotional soap-opera level. Unfortunately, I also agree with Vaiti that the writers are fundamentally soap-opera quality, and not really very good at telling a coherent story. I blame the internet. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 13, 2010, 07:27:15 AM I still say, I miss the dharma and hatch days, I found it much more compelling than all this gods stuff.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 13, 2010, 07:57:54 AM The whole story is a parable about life and religion. You have all these people claiming to know all the answers, but when pushed, they really only know a little part, and what they do know is colored by their perceptions and their aims. There are no white knights, just flawed people put into situations they only half understand and asked to make a choice and live with the consequences.
It's unsatisfying, just like life. :why_so_serious: Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on May 13, 2010, 08:10:40 AM The whole story is a parable about life and religion. You have all these people claiming to know all the answers, but when pushed, they really only know a little part, and what they do know is colored by their perceptions and their aims. There are no white knights, just flawed people put into situations they only half understand and asked to make a choice and live with the consequences. It's unsatisfying, just like life. :why_so_serious: Sure, some sort of post-modern agnosticism could very well be the pay-off... except that story does not really work very well - what with resurrections, smoke monsters, time travel, mysterious wells of life-force, and immortality (or at least extreme longevity)... unless the reveal is Jack waking up from the dream at his Father's funeral. In which case, it is just a really long jump over the shark. I'm just sayin' you can't really make a show that hinges on "Dude, we just don't know how much we don't know" when you're eating apples with a Smoke Monster inhabiting the body of your dead friend. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on May 13, 2010, 09:21:45 AM The show jumped the shark in season three. I'd totally settle for it all being Hurley's dream in the asylum at this point. Because that would be a better ending than what I think we will get. We're going to be left unfulfilled.
The show's title refers to the six years of your life you spent watching it. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 13, 2010, 09:40:35 AM I've been having the creeping suspicion that the "it's someones dream" ending is going to happen for awhile. Maybe one of the writers at his computer. With an empty bottle of scotch next to his keyboard.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 13, 2010, 12:52:32 PM http://darkufo.blogspot.com/2010/05/things-i-noticed-across-sea-by-vozzek69.html#more
I liked this synopsis. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 13, 2010, 02:26:11 PM http://darkufo.blogspot.com/2010/05/things-i-noticed-across-sea-by-vozzek69.html#more That is indeed an awesome synopsis. Lets hope its somewhat true!I liked this synopsis. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 13, 2010, 02:26:43 PM Reading that makes the episode makes sense. He seems fairly spot on with alot of his guesses. If half those guesses turn out to be correct and on mark, then there might be saving this show yet.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on May 13, 2010, 07:16:07 PM This episode was crap.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on May 14, 2010, 06:50:58 AM They should just make Flash Forward a side story since they've already shifted most of the people there anyway. And, on the plus side, it's confusing!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on May 18, 2010, 10:19:57 AM Awesomely funny images (http://www.fusedfilm.com/2010/03/new-batch-of-lost-funnies-march-2010/) :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: MrHat on May 18, 2010, 06:40:27 PM That was awesome.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on May 18, 2010, 08:16:02 PM Swing and a miss.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 18, 2010, 08:23:52 PM Swing and a miss. You are smoking crack, sir. That episode rocked. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 18, 2010, 09:29:12 PM God I hate this show now. Tonight was terrible. I've never turned on a show I've been this committed to so quickly.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 19, 2010, 03:44:30 AM I liked the last episode. Was good.
Episode before last would have been better off earlier in the season I think. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Sir T on May 19, 2010, 05:28:57 AM But... TELL ME KAY'S PERFECT HAIR EXCTENTIONS SURVIVED!!!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 19, 2010, 06:15:38 AM Sadly they were... Lost.
or alternatively they are next Jacob Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 19, 2010, 09:26:28 AM alright let's get on with the theorycraft:
1) Jack steps up, confronts Flocke, fails somehow 2) Swayer saves Jack, stops Flocke (shoves him in glowy cave?), maybe with Desmond and Ben betraying. Swayer nobly dies in self-sacrifice 3) Kate looks on, more acting 4) Hurley is troubled 5) everyone else dies 6) Jack leaves island with Kate to take care of Aaron (everyone forgets about Kwon kid) 7) Hurley WINS, plays golf, eats fruits, hangs out with ghosts TEH END! my only fear is that Jack and Sawyer somehow end up switching places with Jacob and MIB. That would be just gah. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 19, 2010, 09:39:03 AM I was a bit underwhelmed by this episode, and disappointed that Richard went out like a punk bitch (if that is indeed what happened). But I get that it was a setup episode, a moving all the pieces into place type of show that never feels all that interesting. Hate that Linus turned back to his killer ways.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 19, 2010, 09:52:14 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on May 19, 2010, 10:52:37 AM Never discount the possiblity that ben is working an angle of his own that may not be obvious.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Special J on May 19, 2010, 11:49:10 AM Never discount the possiblity that ben is working an angle of his own that may not be obvious. I hope. He really hasn't been the conniving asshole he once was since near the end of season 5. I'm hoping he's saving up for something big. Last night gave some hope of that being the case. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 19, 2010, 11:56:11 AM Never discount the possiblity that ben is working an angle of his own that may not be obvious. Survival. If there's one thing Ben's always been good at, it's figuring out how to survive the messes he's gotten himself into. Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on May 19, 2010, 01:09:12 PM I think he did what he did for survival and a chance to stab somebody in the back another day. Heck Ben killed jacob maybe he will wind up doing in the man in black as well.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on May 19, 2010, 01:18:58 PM An ending where Ben wins and everyone else loses would make me very happy.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: kaid on May 19, 2010, 01:28:04 PM well everybody but desmond who would then come out of nowhere and repeatedly punch ben in the face.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 19, 2010, 01:43:51 PM I'm down with that ending. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on May 19, 2010, 01:57:25 PM I just can't shake the feeling that I'm watching the version marked: DRAFT
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 19, 2010, 02:12:03 PM Well, I'm sure he hated Widmore, but he shot him as he was tell Flocke something he wanted to know, with the excuse that it was about his daughter. I think he is still working for team good, and mainly shot him in an attempt to keep him from telling Locke. After seeing Richard taken out, he knew that the only way to go forward was to do as Flocke said, then find a way to stab in him the back later. Any resistance right then would just result in instant death. Also, I'm so happy they finally killed that damn chick that has been running around with Widmore.
Also, I hope that Richard is still alive. Kind of a big let down to have him go out that way (and Widmore as well for that matter. Was expecting something a bit more epic). Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on May 19, 2010, 02:41:44 PM I think killing Richard would be against the rules, so he's probably still alive.
Ben's waiting for his moment. He killed Widmore for the greater good. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on May 19, 2010, 04:45:02 PM Isn't Ben killing Widmore also against the rules? Or was that more of a "you just don't do that" kind of agreement between them? Maybe he shot Widmore when he did because he knew he wouldn't die.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 19, 2010, 04:53:49 PM Isn't Ben killing Widmore also against the rules? Or was that more of a "you just don't do that" kind of agreement between them? Maybe he shot Widmore when he did because he knew he wouldn't die. Gah, oh yeah, I totally forgot about that. I have a sad feeling they'll never explain that exchange, and its just one plot thread they totally abandoned and will pretend never happened.Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 19, 2010, 04:59:31 PM Richard isn't dead. Nobody said he couldn't be severely fucked up, though. He's probably wounded and bleeding/ tied up somewhere safely out of smokey's way. I agree with the Ben working the angles line of thinking. You could see it on his face as soon as Richard was punked, "Oh shit, how do I work this one out?"
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on May 19, 2010, 05:21:04 PM I have a feeling Richard isn't dead yet. I just read an interview with him where he stated he was happy with how his character arc was resolved after reading the finale script. I can't imagine anyone being happy that their character's resoulution was, 'punted like a football.'
... Actually, yes, I can imagine that. :drill: Saw this in the comments section of io9, gave me a good chuckle. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Special J on May 19, 2010, 06:19:52 PM Never thought he was dead. I figured that was smokey's way of telling Richard to fuck off.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 19, 2010, 10:13:20 PM I will be sorely disappointed if Ben doesn't get the drop on flocke somehow in the finale -- maybe it won't be enough, but I expect he's got some quality scheming going on.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Tebonas on May 20, 2010, 12:12:46 AM Since they were only protected by the Candidate status and a successor is chosen, all the other Candidates could be killable by Smokey now. Hope he doesn't find that out.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 20, 2010, 04:09:30 AM I'm looking forward to all the nerd rage after the final episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Special J on May 20, 2010, 06:25:50 AM I'm looking forward to all the nerd rage after the final episode. Pretty much a guarantee no matter what happens. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Sir T on May 20, 2010, 06:38:51 AM I have my popcorn ready. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 21, 2010, 02:49:34 AM disappointed that Richard went out like a punk bitch Richard has always been a punk bitch. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 23, 2010, 09:58:53 AM Gets mentioned this today in irc.
[18:22:11] @Gets: "attention everyone who watches LOST: GET OFF THE INTERNET NOW. finale spoilers are being spammed by 4chan, trolls. some are also coming to irc and spoiling." No idea where he picked the quote up from, but yeah. Apparently the ending got leaked somewhere or something. blah blah. So if you care about that sort of thing, be warned. Advert thine eyes from Lost related comments and whatnot for awhile. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 23, 2010, 10:12:32 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Cheddar on May 23, 2010, 02:10:32 PM REMINDER - tonight is the series finale.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 23, 2010, 03:51:42 PM supposedly they shot 3 endings. Could've audience tested them and that leaked out. Anyways. Tonight. No disappointment please.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 23, 2010, 05:01:10 PM At this point I'm just hoping for MINIMAL disappointment.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 23, 2010, 07:43:18 PM The Target commercials are priceless! :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on May 23, 2010, 08:33:43 PM Oh, right... just in case. Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 23, 2010, 08:34:51 PM I'm not quite sure what the hell I just watched. I do know that it beat out the BSG ending on the WTFometer.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Triforcer on May 23, 2010, 08:38:29 PM I'm not quite sure what the hell I just watched. I do know that it beat out the BSG ending on the WTFometer. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Evil Elvis on May 23, 2010, 08:40:12 PM I am dissapoint.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Merusk on May 23, 2010, 08:47:01 PM I thought it fit the show. I'm not disappointed.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 23, 2010, 08:47:40 PM That has got to be the worse piece of shit I've seen in my life. If anyone is wondering if they should ever watch this show, the answer is, "Don't bother".
Fuck. :heartbreak: Title: Re: Lost Post by: MournelitheCalix on May 23, 2010, 08:51:02 PM Not sure why all the hate, I really liked it. I think some people here wouldn't have been happy with it no matter how they ended it.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Triforcer on May 23, 2010, 08:52:19 PM That has got to be the worse piece of shit I've seen in my life. If anyone is wondering if they should ever watch this show, the answer is, "Don't bother". Fuck. :heartbreak: Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 23, 2010, 08:54:58 PM I'm going to reserve judgement until I see these three alternate endings that will be on Jimmy Kimmel.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: KallDrexx on May 23, 2010, 08:58:55 PM I just don't understand. BSG was more tolerable because it at least gave hints in the last few episodes that it was going to go off on a retarded note. This was actually pretty sane up until the last 5 minutes.... Title: Re: Lost Post by: Triforcer on May 23, 2010, 08:59:33 PM I'm going to reserve judgement until I see these three alternate endings that will be on Jimmy Kimmel. I hope one of them is a comedy ending, where Ben is walking away and suddenly a polar bear jumps out of the bushes and mauls him as the final scene. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 23, 2010, 09:00:23 PM That has got to be the worse piece of shit I've seen in my life. If anyone is wondering if they should ever watch this show, the answer is, "Don't bother". Fuck. :heartbreak: What the hell are you talking about? Keep the stupid religious and political arguments in that forum. Title: Re: Lost Post by: tazelbain on May 23, 2010, 09:38:02 PM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 23, 2010, 09:58:12 PM (http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y222/Abagadro/CartmanLAME.jpg)
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 23, 2010, 10:03:41 PM I really liked it.
It was time for the series to end, but I'm still sad to see it go. Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 23, 2010, 10:14:59 PM Alternate ending #3. Totally would've gone with that.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 24, 2010, 01:32:58 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Furiously on May 24, 2010, 02:09:35 AM Alternate ending #3. Totally would've gone with that. That would have been awesome. Though I bet at the time most people watching felt pretty cheated. So.... when's the movie coming out for what happened between? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 24, 2010, 02:19:44 AM Well.
Yeah, I dunno. I still enjoyed the show overall - certainly there was a lot of fun on the journey... the destination, well, not exactly what I was hoping for. The thing is, they've known for what, the last two years that these were the last two years, right? I was sort of expecting them to build to something that felt a bit more coherent and a bit less tacked on, even if they ended up cheating a bunch to make it fit with the first four years. Just didn't really hang together in the end and didn't even explain the "it worked" and the "alternate timeline" and such... the island on the bottom of the ocean in the opener to S6. Ah well. TV. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 24, 2010, 03:07:55 AM Best spoiler I saw before broadcast.
LOST Spoiler Alert: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 24, 2010, 03:12:10 AM If you stuck with the show for all six years and thought it was more about the "answers" than the characters, I am shocked.
Mind you, I would have enjoyed some nice coherent wrap-it-all-up answers, but at the end of the day that wasn't what kept me coming back every episode. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 24, 2010, 03:22:15 AM I just thought that comment was funny. After watching the ending I thought it was ironic that I would have enjoyed the last episode far more with one less answer given
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 24, 2010, 03:33:29 AM Interesting thought. It certainly would have been a very different ending without the immediately preceding infodump to tell you what it means...
EDIT: also: http://twitpic.com/1qjjtr Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 24, 2010, 03:38:59 AM I found the ending pretty damn emotional.
Then again, with that particular Lost song playing in the background, just about anything seems emotional. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QakUYuHnfrk Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 24, 2010, 03:52:20 AM It's weird. It's not like a hated it or felt burnt by it "the last six years has been a waste!" (the Jacob/MIB Origin Story episode probably wins the "WTF, You're kidding?" award for giving a horribly non-satisfying answer to a question). It's just that I feel like maybe they could have done better than the clip-show to remind me that I enjoyed these characters and their adventures.
A lot of the ending worked for me -- I liked Jack taking Jacob's role temporarily and finally ending up where he began. Hurley as the guardian of the island and Ben finally finding his purpose as Hurley's "Richard". The MIB defeated without us ever knowing if the world really would end (or maybe just the island). I mean think about that... a bunch of people were convinced that somehow the world would be destroyed if the MIB escaped, but really? really? None of those people were people who I believed actually *knew* anything (or that I would even trust to be truthful if they knew). It seems like Unlocke could only find freedom by becoming mortal, in which case he just doesn't seem like that big a threat to the world. And you know, I'm fine with there being no answer to that. Title: Re: Lost Post by: raydeen on May 24, 2010, 03:55:06 AM Y'know, I'm kinda ok with the ending except...
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 24, 2010, 03:58:51 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: Quinton on May 24, 2010, 04:21:07 AM Y'know, I'm kinda ok with the ending except... Title: Re: Lost Post by: Modern Angel on May 24, 2010, 04:57:02 AM I think you dudes are overthinking that last little bit.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 24, 2010, 05:52:16 AM Title: Re: Lost Post by: March on May 24, 2010, 07:00:44 AM Y'know, I'm kinda ok with the ending except... [Spoiler Theory #84721][Questions] Okay, plenty of holes, but what can you do... Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on May 24, 2010, 07:15:23 AM I don't know what I'm supposed to put in spoiler tags. I should think most people who haven't watched the ending yet but intend to, wouldn't come here. Who knows. It's like posting in green. It annoys me when I see it. It looks strange. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 24, 2010, 08:18:14 AM You could of just watched the last season with a little character background and follow the story easy enough because it had zero to do with the rest of the last five years.
It was incredibly lazy writing and a cop-out. Title: Re: Lost Post by: UnSub on May 24, 2010, 08:24:30 AM I'm here, having stopped watching Lost in season 2 (?) when Echo died. I was waiting to see if I missed anything.
Not much, it appears. As for characters: I got tired of them early on having to be idiots to keep the plot rolling along. It really didn't appear that anything changed. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 24, 2010, 08:48:12 AM Deus. Ex. Machina.
Not that I'm surprised. Or anyone on this board is surprised. We expected this kind of ending looooooong ago. It's the trend and status que that must be maintained for good shows I guess. The endings are always complete bullshit. I was actually laughing around the last minute of the episode as I saw what they were doing. I feel this ending is far far worse than BSG even. BSG I feel has somewhat of an excuse for it's horribly shoddy rushed ending. Somewhere around the end of Season 2 or the middle of Season 3 of BSG they got the news that there wasn't going to be more than 4 seasons, and thus things rapidly changed course and we got the ending we did due to them having to wrap things up quick. Lost, on the other hand. Knew damn well in advance, from the start of Season 4, that they were going to have only 6 seasons. I think they even announced that earlier than Season 4, maybe even around the start of Season 3. 2-3 full seasons to wrap this shit up in a way that makes some sense. And they take the "the ending is what you, the viewer, wants it to be" out. Bravo. Well done. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 08:50:02 AM I thought it was less disappointing than the BSG ending. Which is a low bar, but at least it saved me the expense of heaving a brick through my TV. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 24, 2010, 09:15:35 AM Oh, I'll go with less disappointing. I was actually laughing here. Where as with BSG for the last half of it's ending I was in perpetual "WTF are you doing" mode.
They ended the way we pretty much knew it would end. The ending even worked. But it would have worked better 2 seasons ago :grin: The last 2 seasons seem to actually hurt their explanation but adding on 2 extra seasons of questions for an ending that we basically figured out from season 1. For whatever reason while writing the above I was reminded of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dWMIuipn_c (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dWMIuipn_c) Title: Re: Lost Post by: Engels on May 24, 2010, 09:36:09 AM You know what I hate? Idjits that put season finale spoilers in the Facebook status update. I mean, right there, not in the comments, I mean, bold as life, all caps, spoilers.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 24, 2010, 09:36:37 AM I'm sort of torn on that. I guess I could see "less disappointing" in that BSG still retained some of its awesomeness (it was certainly up and down in season 4, but when it was up, it was way up) going into the final episodes. So walking into it, you figured it could have been a good ending, but turned out not to be. With Lost, we've slowly been building up this entire season to disappointment, and we knew it was coming. The way they were just writing of explanations with half ass'ed poorly thought out answers, and just ignoring most things, I think everybody was prepared for something like this going into the final episode.
I will say I think this was a worst ending however. Lost is a mystery/character show. They pretty much fucked over all the characters by this point, but then they completely fucked over all the mystery as well. At least I still enjoyed watching the BSG final episode. Even if I wish they had done it differently, the overall plot for the end was fine, they just didn't execute it very well. With the Lost final episode, I watched them break rule after rule in moving the plot forward, some they had just setup only a few episodes before. They proceeded to not explain a damn thing. And the few things they did explain sucked. I didn't even really enjoy watching this episode, and had several eye rolling moments. I also had to pause and take a break when we went through yet another damn birth scene. So yeah, I'd say they actually managed a worst ending than BSG. But I'm not really that deeply disappointed, since they gave us plenty of foreshadowing that the writers really do just suck. :awesome_for_real: Edit: You know what I hate? Idjits that put season finale spoilers in the Facebook status update. I mean, right there, not in the comments, I mean, bold as life, all caps, spoilers. The sad thing is there is almost nothing to spoil. Like, the thing I just put in spoiler tags and the explanation for the sideways world is pretty much it.Title: Re: Lost Post by: Engels on May 24, 2010, 09:39:29 AM I don't even mind spoilers 'unspoilered' in this thread. I mean, really, if you're going to go to a thread called Lost on a forum, you sorta expect spoilers. I just don't read this thread till I get to see it tomorrow or whenever. But really, in the FB status page. What are you, an idiot?!
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 24, 2010, 09:41:13 AM I thought it was absolutely brilliant. Just go ahead and count me in the fanboy camp, because the only thing I was disappointed that they didn't answer was the origins of Dogan and the temple. Other than that, I was thoroughly satisfied. I think Modern Angel got the gist of the ending correct.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: AcidCat on May 24, 2010, 09:59:06 AM It was an amazing emotional catharsis for me, I thought it ended wonderfully. These characters have been a part of my life for a long time, it is sad to see them go.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 10:04:20 AM I think the most disappointing thing for me might have been the fact that they didn't explain fuck all about Eloise.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 24, 2010, 10:04:34 AM because the show wasn't about the island, it was about these characters and their reactions to what they are put through. [/spoiler] Same excuse they used for the BSG ending. iirc As for the audience expecting too much bit. Here is my take on that. I was expecting more, but most of my expectations came from them dangling a carrot in my face. Here is a giant three toed statue. We're going to make a big deal about how mysterious it is. We'll keep alluding to it abunch. Where did it come from? Why does Jacob live there? You don't need to know. Look at this fucking statue tho. It's fucking mysterious. Stop asking about it. Look at this fucking statue. This statue is really fucking important. Stop asking about it. I'm going with the artistic cop out and "We didn't think it through" on the writers behalf for the answers here. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Nonentity on May 24, 2010, 10:13:19 AM If you stuck with the show for all six years and thought it was more about the "answers" than the characters, I am shocked. Mind you, I would have enjoyed some nice coherent wrap-it-all-up answers, but at the end of the day that wasn't what kept me coming back every episode. I stole this as a quote to stick in my writeup I did on Facebook, because I feel exactly the same way. It's sad to see the characters go, but in their restraints, they did as well as they could have done, and I was happy. Here's what I posted there regarding Lost: Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 10:26:20 AM I was expecting more, but most of my expectations came from them dangling a carrot in my face. Here is a giant three toed statue. We're going to make a big deal about how mysterious it is. We'll keep alluding to it abunch. Where did it come from? Why does Jacob live there? You don't need to know. Look at this fucking statue tho. It's fucking mysterious. Stop asking about it. Look at this fucking statue. This statue is really fucking important. Stop asking about it. Yeah, pretty much this. I thought the things they did wrap up were done well enough, but there was a LOT of stuff that they spent a lot of time getting me curious about with no payoff at the end. Cockteases. :-P Title: Re: Lost Post by: Modern Angel on May 24, 2010, 11:08:59 AM It strikes me, on thinking some more about it and reading some more analysis, that this is actually two shows in one. On the one hand, we had the sprawling genre fiction epic with all of the questions. That show is immensely unsatisfying given the ending and season six.
But on the other hand we have a character drama and, more importantly, an examination of the mythology of storytelling itself. The rub here is that I don't even think they meant to make the second show. This second show, though? It's amazingly consistent in its use of repeated themes. I can't think of another show that did a better job of picking out about two dozen themes and symbols and using them as well and as consistently as Lost has. For this second Lost, the story at the end really didn't matter; only the use of theme, symbol and mood does. I think last night's finale was pretty disappointing for the first Lost but pretty rad for the second. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Vaiti on May 24, 2010, 11:22:38 AM Basically the conclusion I've come to as well. Basically.
Lost was both about the characters and the island and it's mystery. You can group fans into 3 camps. Those who watched for the characters, tho for the island etc; and those who were half and half. There were characters I liked and disliked. If one of the ones I disliked got a episode centering around them, I was less inclined to want to watch it or pay that much attention. However, if said episode preview also happened to include little glimpes of say... some new Hatch or what have you. I would watch the episode more carefully. Not because I honestly gave a crap at all about what Kate was doing for instance. But wtf is up with that Hatch. I MUST KNOW. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Paelos on May 24, 2010, 11:28:46 AM I'm glad I gave up trying to care four or five episodes ago. The train was already totally derailed for me when they kept talking about these stupid side-interactions that I just couldn't see any purpose for. I actually thought it was some version of hell. Turned out it was just my version.
Also the whole, "It's about the journey," copout we hear so often? Think about the number of really good episodes. Then, honestly think about how many of the episodes were total cockblocking filler shit that advanced maybe one setpiece. Run a percentage. My guess is at best across all viewers you're coming up with 60/40. The journey sucked too. Yeah, I watched it for the mystery. I liked some of the characters, but the writers went out of their way to pose a lot of questions they refused to deal with. We were led out to an Oasis, which turned out to be a mirage, and now people are drinking the sand and telling the rest of us how refreshing it is. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on May 24, 2010, 11:31:16 AM I was expecting more, but most of my expectations came from them dangling a carrot in my face. Here is a giant three toed statue. We're going to make a big deal about how mysterious it is. We'll keep alluding to it a bunch. Where did it come from? Why does Jacob live there? You don't need to know. Look at this fucking statue tho. It's fucking mysterious. Stop asking about it. Look at this fucking statue. This statue is really fucking important. Stop asking about it. Yeah, pretty much this. I thought the things they did wrap up were done well enough, but there was a LOT of stuff that they spent a lot of time getting me curious about with no payoff at the end. Cockteases. :-P I completely agree with these statements, but at the same time, I agree with HaemishM. As much as I was intrigued by the mysteries, and as cock-punchingly bad as the writers managed to handle resolving them, I'm still quite happy with the ending. From the very start, what made this show good for me was the characters, and the finale was a nice goodbye to them. Kate and Juliet wear black dresses well. I am somewhat upset that we never really found out what the whole deal with Widmore was, either before or after he 'saw the error of his ways.' What was that shit in the boat going to be used for, anyways? Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 11:33:43 AM Anyone who guessed that the flash sideways was hell wasn't all that far off. The main difference between purgatory and hell is that you eventually get out of purgatory.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 24, 2010, 11:49:56 AM because the show wasn't about the island, it was about these characters and their reactions to what they are put through. Same excuse they used for the BSG ending. iirc No. Ronald Moore came out many times and said that the characters were slaves to the story, which is why they changed fucking moods with the wind. The BSG characters were whoever they needed to be for whatever story the writers wanted to tell that week. That was one of the many flaws with the last half of the series. The characters never had any consistency. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Soln on May 24, 2010, 11:51:41 AM I think Haemish's write up makes the most sense. The ending was a way for the writer's to allow the fans a happy ending for all the characters they cared about, even Ben.
I guess they could've done more, but the on-island scenes were quite well paced. Honest question to us all: what ending would have we preferred? personally, I would've liked a little more about the smoke and all the Egyptian references. And maybe more about the Dharma Initiative. Oh wells, not as bad as the XFiles. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Rishathra on May 24, 2010, 12:02:49 PM Same excuse they used for the BSG ending. iirc No. Ronald Moore came out many times and said that the characters were slaves to the story, which is why they changed fucking moods with the wind. The BSG characters were whoever they needed to be for whatever story the writers wanted to tell that week. That was one of the many flaws with the last half of the series. The characters never had any consistency. In the same breath, he would say that the show was ALL ABOUT the characters, and not about silly things like plot or storyline, apparently oblivious to the contradiction he was making. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Draegan on May 24, 2010, 12:06:38 PM I was looking for a mix of mythology/science/mystery ending where the two timelines met each other and there was some kind of ending where they either reset and they never crashed, or everyone died, or everything started over again.
I really detested the "everyone goes to heaven except the black people", it's like they weren't even trying. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Ozzu on May 24, 2010, 12:10:47 PM While I did end up liking the sideways flashes because I really liked those characters and wanted them to have the "happy ending", I think this season would have been better if they would have left it off. Just let the island timeline play out and leave the other stuff alone. However, it was cool to see everyone again and get to see reunions for people who I never thought would meet again. So, eh, I dunno.
Writing-wise though? Definitely should have left off the sideways flashes. I still really enjoyed it though. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Special J on May 24, 2010, 12:13:12 PM I didn't mind the ending. It didn't blow me away but it was alright. Sure there were some things that I wanted more of: Widmore's exit was rather abrupt, I'd have liked more on some characters, more on the nature of the island or the aftermath (guess we're not really meant to know), and I was hoping for one final act of fuckery from Ben.
But after digesting it a bit, I liked how the side-flashes worked out and wrapped up. Overall I left satisfied. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Signe on May 24, 2010, 12:16:31 PM Maybe my feeling of meh was because I never got quite as emotionally invested or something. It was pretty good series compared to most others. Some episodes were absolutely riveting and some I sort of dozed through. I thought it was inconsistent in that respect. There were a couple of seasons I thought were mostly crap.
As for the last show (not including the catch up show), it had a great beginning, some tedious middle moments and a very disappointing end. I enjoyed the symbolism they used, which is something I liked throughout the series. I loved the little bursts of connections they showed between the characters in and out of the sideways time line (although the whole sideways time line idea could have been better throughout) and how it lead to remembering. They went overboard with the clips, though. It was as if they wanted people who were tuning in to the show for the very first time to understand everything that had happened in the last six years. That's just silly - especially after a catch up show. The very end just seemed like an easy cop out to me. It felt meaningless. After killing some of the main characters several times during the season, they just kill them again and then bring them back but they're dead? What? I thought the glowy cave was very pretty and rather Indiana Jonesish but where the fuck did THAT come from and why did we only know about it a couple of weeks ago? Suddenly the most important item in the show is brand new! I guess that's when they thought it up? I don't need every little thing neatly connected and tied up at the end (although I remember reading that the writers were going to do that) but I would have liked to know what the fuck was up with that giant statue and it's foot, too. The last twenty minutes or so of this show was a let down. I guess we're done with spoiler tags. Good. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 12:19:43 PM I'll start listing unresolved questions.
What was up with the Egyptian stuff? How did Hawking know so much? Who built the temple and why? Why did the hatch built in the 1970s use Jacob's numbers for the six remaining candidates in the 2000s? How did the "normal" people have supernatural abilities (Locke, Desmond, Miles, Hurley, I'm probably missing some)? Why did the mother's protection "charm" for Jacob and Smokey extend to the candidates? If Jacob could just come back from the dead by getting his ashes from Hurley, why'd he wait so long to do it? Why didn't Jack become a smoke monster? Why would the ultimate source of life and goodness turn someone into an evil smoke monster anyway? Why did Hawking want to "preserve" the sideways reality? Was the version of her in that reality even "real" (or was she a figment like Jack's son)? ...etc. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 12:21:32 PM I really detested the "everyone goes to heaven except the black people", it's like they weren't even trying. LOL, good point. They brought back all the white characters that I had totally forgotten the existence of, but no Michael, Walt, or Echo. Nice. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Teleku on May 24, 2010, 12:31:02 PM I really detested the "everyone goes to heaven except the black people", it's like they weren't even trying. LOL, good point. They brought back all the white characters that I had totally forgotten the existence of, but no Michael, Walt, or Echo. Nice. Title: Re: Lost Post by: HaemishM on May 24, 2010, 12:36:10 PM I'll start listing unresolved questions. What was up with the Egyptian stuff? Some Egyptians settled there at some point. Quote How did Hawking know so much? Sideways Hawking? Because she was dead, just like Jack's dad. Other Hawking? Because she was an Other, an original inhabitant of the island. Quote Who built the temple and why? See Egyptians above. Quote Why did the hatch built in the 1970s use Jacob's numbers for the six remaining candidates in the 2000s? The Vanzetti equation? Quote How did the "normal" people have supernatural abilities (Locke, Desmond, Miles, Hurley, I'm probably missing some)? It's a supernatural world. Quote Why did the mother's protection "charm" for Jacob and Smokey extend to the candidates? That was Jacob's "rule" not the mother's. Quote If Jacob could just come back from the dead by getting his ashes from Hurley, why'd he wait so long to do it? Jacob's a dick. Quote Why didn't Jack become a smoke monster? The smoke monster was only that way because he was exposed to the light through an act of sin (murder). Jack sacrificed himself to keep the light alive, thus there was no evil to latch onto. Quote Why would the ultimate source of life and goodness turn someone into an evil smoke monster anyway? Life is ugly and brutal? Quote Why did Hawking want to "preserve" the sideways reality? Was the version of her in that reality even "real" (or was she a figment like Jack's son)? She wasn't ready to move on - she had killed her son in her real life and had not accepted responsibility for it yet. It's the same reason Ben didn't want to leave with the rest of the cast as well. He wanted to make peace with the fact that he'd gotten his daughter killed. Both were happy living with the children whose deaths they caused. Sorry for the SirBrucing. Title: Re: Lost Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2010, 12:46:00 PM Rose got to go to Nirvana so at least one black person got in.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Triforcer on May 24, 2010, 12:52:06 PM How does Ben get to go to heaven? If Eko doesn't get in for massacring random African villagers, how does Ben get in after HIS youthful massacre? Heaven can't be that racist, can it? :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Trippy on May 24, 2010, 12:52:19 PM I changed the title cause I hate using spoiler tags in discussions.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 24, 2010, 01:02:47 PM There are a ton of inconsistencies and un-answered questions that I don't want to even begin thinking about. The whole Black Smoke = Man In Black was terrible. It never made sense.
How about how in seasons 1-5 you got a sense of how large the island was and how hard travel was. Then in season 6 they ran laps around the place in a single day. How about the whole WAAAAAAALT story line they just chopped off? How did we go for Losties vs. Others to some other Others in a Temple? Where were all these factions before? Why is there a cabin? I don't get that in context of the Jacob vs. MiB relationship that we learned about this season. Why can't the smoke monster cross the ashes? In the first episode the black smoke was ripping down trees. Why? You have this interesting pseudo scienece with Hawkings and the Lampost and all the other Dharma shit. In the end it means nothing. Why was the MiB pretending to be Walt? Just to kill Boone's sister? God damn there are tons of stuff that were pretty big events in the show and they have so many holes in them. During the time-skipping thing, who was shooting at the Losties in the canoe? Meh. Most of Season 6 had zero connection with the first five years. Zero. Except maybe the characters. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Modern Angel on May 24, 2010, 01:06:24 PM Ben didn't get into heaven, actually. He said he wasn't joining in the party in the church because he has to spend some more time in purgatory working through his sins.
I won't defend season six as a whole. It was pretty mediocre to terrible (fuck you Kate episode, fuck you horrible Jacob/Smoke Monster episode) as a whole. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Furiously on May 24, 2010, 01:23:17 PM I'm still trying to figure out exactly what the nuke did.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2010, 01:27:29 PM Put them back in present day. That's it. Except there was never really an explanation for how/why they were transported to 1977 anyways so the whole exercise was pointless other than creating a time paradox (never mentioned) with Ben and killing Juliet.
Title: Re: Lost Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 01:36:39 PM Sideways Hawking? Because she was dead, just like Jack's dad. Other Hawking? Because she was an Other, an original inhabitant of the island. Ben was Chief Other, and he didn't know shit. Neither did Richard, it seemed. And they both actually lived on the island. Compare that to Hawking's apparent omniscience, which she by all appearances gained after she left the island. Also, her big island-finding gadget, which was never explained. Quote The Valenzetti equation? Okay, fair enough. New question -- why did Jacob's numbering scheme for candidates happen to make the last six candidates match the coefficients of the Valenzetti equation? They spent so much time waving those numbers at us, I wanted some explanation of why they seem to be behind everything. Even if it was something stupid like "that's God's cel phone number and it reverberates throughout all of reality whenever He gets a text". Quote That was Jacob's "rule" not the mother's. Okay, new question. Why the fuck did Smokey have to follow Jacob's rules? If Jacob had the power to define arbitrary rules affecting Smokey, couldn't he have made a rule like "Smokey has to fucking sit in a corner for the rest of eternity"? Quote The smoke monster was only that way because he was exposed to the light through an act of sin (murder). Jack sacrificed himself to keep the light alive, thus there was no evil to latch onto. Jacob's mother applied no such caveats when Jacob asked what would happen if he went into the light. She made it very clear that touching the light means fate worse than death. Jack touched the light and... died of his previous injuries, apparently. Desmond gets a pass because he's magic, but Jack should have suffered whatever fate Jacob's mother warned him against, which was apparently becoming an evil smoke monster. Points about certain people having to wait in various levels of purgatory are well made. I'll buy those. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Soln on May 24, 2010, 01:37:14 PM Good points all, but I am kind of glad it didn't end with "ALIENS ZOMG!!" or some similar materialism. I really thought they would end up not explaining everything, but that they would give an origin story that would bork any further mystery (explicitly explained or not). So I'm not wholly disappointed. It was "OK". Wouldn't watch again though.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Soln on May 24, 2010, 01:38:41 PM Oh yeah. WTF is up with Ricardus on a jet heading to where? LA? To do what? Open a spa? He was a big mystery for so long. That ending for him seemed a little :uhrr:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 24, 2010, 01:39:13 PM Ben didn't get into heaven, actually. He said he wasn't joining in the party in the church because he has to spend some more time in purgatory working through his sins. I won't defend season six as a whole. It was pretty mediocre to terrible (fuck you Kate episode, fuck you horrible Jacob/Smoke Monster episode) as a whole. I can't defend season six or season three. If you took both of them out, and simply wrapped it up with one or two extra episodes on what was season 5, I'm probably a happy camper. For those of you who don't remember, season three was the never-ending 23 episode slog which was broken up in two parts (3 months apart in airing), that started with everyone imprisoned by the Others, and ended much later with Charlie dead and "Not Penny's boat." That season also introduced two of the most hated characters in the show (Nikki and Paulo), they killed Eko (bastards), and we see how Ben ices Dharma. Most of it was boring, boring shit and also set the record for a low point in viewership throughout the series. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 24, 2010, 01:42:14 PM Oh yeah. WTF is up with Ricardus on a jet heading to where? LA? To do what? Open a spa? He was a big mystery for so long. That ending for him seemed a little :uhrr: Richard himself was :uhrr:. Any mystery he had was dead when we got his rather boring origin story. I assume he went to go live a boring normal life. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2010, 01:48:08 PM I believe Eloise had Farraday's "notebook from the future" from whe she shot him in 1977 so she had a lot of info from there.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 24, 2010, 01:55:45 PM When Desmond was flashing through weird realities and bought an engagement ring from Eloise... what was that all about?
How is she the master of everything? Fuck. Someone needs to create a Lovecraft type of show with some cool mysteries and shit. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Evil Elvis on May 24, 2010, 02:03:10 PM Half the season spent showing me how happy Jack is with imaginary-make-believe-son in purgatory, and not one Walt answer? Nothing on the women dying during childbirth? Nothing about the cabin and the ring of ash? Cocksuckers.
But what really gets me is that they knew full well they weren't going to answer any questions, and these bastards decided to double-down and bring up a dozen new questions this season they knew they wouldn't explain. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 24, 2010, 02:16:02 PM Ok, here's my problem. Lost was a character show, that is for sure. But it was also a mystery show. It was an amazing show because it combined the two awesomely. These characters in a cop show wouldn't be nearly as interesting, just as a mysterious island show wouldn't have been that good without the amazing characters and back story. I've felt they sort of fucked both sides over, however, which is why I'm let down.
Ever since season 4'ish, they stopped really caring about the characters. They kept changing and going back and forth with their actions with no real consistency. In short, the writers just had them be slaves to the plot, and wrote them into doing what ever it was the plot needed done. I still felt and cared for the characters, but the whole deep character aspect of the show was pretty much done for me the last few years. Nothing about them or their actions was very compelling anymore. Certainly not like it was in the first 2 seasons. So going forward, all I really had left to keep me watching the show was the island mystery plot. That was enough to keep me going since the last 2 seasons had plenty of fun action and twists, with a steady stream of minor secret reveals to keep me interested. Then this season came. They introduced all sorts of new things, that in the end, were never explained at all (see, all the temple shit). They didn't explain jack shit really. It became very obvious how lazy and bad the writing was all along with the plot. Jacobs actions completely contradict each other season to season, and frankly, almost episode to episode at some points. There was almost no sense or relevance to anything that happened. The plot holes are massive. No explanations were given about anything (seriously, nothing at all about the fucking hatch that was so important guys?). The way things worked out, every characters actions during the whole show were completely irrelevant. People died and sacrificed for absolutely nothing. So they basically fucked over all mystery storyline stuff as well. I lost my characters and my mystery, which is why I'm pretty upset with how the whole end worked out. I think the only bright spot was the very end, when they all realized that the sideways world was purgatory(or whatever), and were having a happy reunion. It was a nice way of taking the sting away from, what we now see, was the COMPLETELY POINTLESS KILLING of characters we loved over the years. I liked that they did all get a happy ending, because I to cared about the characters. But the very end was the only bright spot on the whole thing, and I think the series as a whole is deeply marred. Really would have been best if they had just stopped the series at season 2 or 3, went with "the island is purgatory" theory, and having everybody eventually "move on" in some touching way. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: AcidCat on May 24, 2010, 02:36:37 PM they killed Eko (bastards) They killed Mr. Eko because the actor wanted out. On a similar note, they wanted him back for a scene in the finale, but he demanded like five times what they were willing to pay. They don't have total creative control over everything just because of these kind of real world issues - originally they had big plans for Eko. Not like an author who can control whatever happens in his book. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 24, 2010, 02:40:29 PM Here's my take:
Both authors always said how much they love Star Wars, the symbolism of the Hero's Journey of Anakyn (if it was portrayed well it's another story) and so on. In the initial script of the pilot, when Jack appears for the first time, they describe him as the "Hero" of our story. - LOST is basically another modern re-interpretation of the Hero's Journey, in this case of Jack Shephard. The objective of this journey, is finally to "let it go" of whatever happened before. During the Journey, the Hero find himself in various situations, adventures (The Island) and he meets lots of characters (the other ones we loved and hated) which will help him gain enough consciousness so he can finally move on. Of course a lot of people are not satisfied with the lack of answers, or lack of coverage of other aspects of the show. This is where the Authors took the more risky and corageous step, because this is not "life", this is just a TV Show, and from a TV show, when it poses questions, you expect straightforward answers, or at least LOTS of tools to answer them yourself. But instead, think about this: during our life, lots of stuff happens. There are some key moments, and other we will barely remember when we look back. This is why the most important aspect of LOST, at least in what I think is the interpretation of the Authors, is the Hero's Journey of Jack Shephard (and yes, even of the other characters), and not the Dharma supplies coming down from the Sky, or MIB name, or whatever. It's all about the growth of our Hero, and the trials he has to undertake. All the rest is a stage. And yes, in no way that means it should please everyone, but the Authors had enough courage to build the show specifically around that concept. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 24, 2010, 03:38:44 PM Here's my take: Both authors always said how much they love Star Wars, the symbolism of the Hero's Journey of Anakyn (if it was portrayed well it's another story) and so on. In the initial script of the pilot, when Jack appears for the first time, they describe him as the "Hero" of our story. - LOST is basically another modern re-interpretation of the Hero's Journey, in this case of Jack Shephard. The objective of this journey, is finally to "let it go" of whatever happened before. During the Journey, the Hero find himself in various situations, adventures (The Island) and he meets lots of characters (the other ones we loved and hated) which will help him gain enough consciousness so he can finally move on. Of course a lot of people are not satisfied with the lack of answers, or lack of coverage of other aspects of the show. This is where the Authors took the more risky and corageous step, because this is not "life", this is just a TV Show, and from a TV show, when it poses questions, you expect straightforward answers, or at least LOTS of tools to answer them yourself. But instead, think about this: during our life, lots of stuff happens. There are some key moments, and other we will barely remember when we look back. This is why the most important aspect of LOST, at least in what I think is the interpretation of the Authors, is the Hero's Journey of Jack Shephard (and yes, even of the other characters), and not the Dharma supplies coming down from the Sky, or MIB name, or whatever. It's all about the growth of our Hero, and the trials he has to undertake. All the rest is a stage. And yes, in no way that means it should please everyone, but the Authors had enough courage to build the show specifically around that concept. You sir, are drinking the sand. What the authors did was for the sole purpose of prolonging a concept that had no legs, and forcing in random elements to keep the audience just engaged enough that they would be willing to limp across the finish line. If you are looking for deeper meaning, goals, or artistic licenses here, you are looking in the wrong place. The writers were put on notice after season 3 when the fans got tired of their drawn out bullshit. The studio cracked down on them to pick up the pace, so instead of just ending it, they added two more seasons of totally whacky shit that had nothing to do with what was going on. Also, Jack is a pretty shitty hero. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 24, 2010, 03:58:40 PM You sir, are drinking the sand. What the authors did was for the sole purpose of prolonging a concept that had no legs, and forcing in random elements to keep the audience just engaged enough that they would be willing to limp across the finish line. If you are looking for deeper meaning, goals, or artistic licenses here, you are looking in the wrong place. The writers were put on notice after season 3 when the fans got tired of their drawn out bullshit. The studio cracked down on them to pick up the pace, so instead of just ending it, they added two more seasons of totally whacky shit that had nothing to do with what was going on. Also, Jack is a pretty shitty hero. I totally disagree with everything you just wrote, but hey, that's fine. Jack is just a flawed hero, a flawed person who at the end of the series just finished walking a personal path of growth. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 24, 2010, 04:09:05 PM Lucas I think you're giving the shitty writers of this show wwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyy too much credit.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 24, 2010, 04:09:42 PM You've got it backwards Paelos. The it was the shows creators who negotiated the ABC execs into setting an end date. The problems with season 3 came from the fact that there was no end in sight for the show, and so they couldn't reveal too much or advance to plot too far. By getting the execs to set an end date, then they could control the flow. The executives just wanted it to run it endlessly until it didn't make anymore money and then cancel it, like every other normal television show.
Lucas, are you really saying it was courageous to make a show about "the hero's journey", when that's what just about every single adventure show ever made is based around? Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 24, 2010, 04:29:18 PM Hehe, ok, look: I understand you can also look it from a more cynical (more realistic? yeah, maybe) point of view, and that's Paleos approach, for example (if I understood well). I just decided to "play along", for now pretending they actually tried to give us something more deep than your usual shitty procedural medic or crime :P
And well, at the beginning of my post, Teleku, I also said it was "another modern re-interpretation" of the hero's journey :). It was "courageous" because they totally haven't tried to please everyone and they decided to send a "final message" about the show that, while open to interpretation, is very focused (and IMO, that's NOT a so called "cop-out"): not about the island mythology, or several other aspect of the show (they could have tried to cover all of them at once, but I'm not sure about a successful outcome :P), but about the Characters, and infact, while in the end is the Journey of Jack Shephard (after all, the first and last scene is centered around him), in reality it is also the Journey of Claire, Locke, Ben and all the others, so I stand corrected on that. Like Christian Shephard say, in the end they all needed each other to move on, to end that personal path of growth (again, through a series of tasks which mostly happened on the Island) that will shoot them in whatever comes next :). Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: March on May 24, 2010, 04:48:56 PM I'm not buying the "It's a character drama" bullshit.
If they wanted to write a character drama, they could have done so: Plane crashes on deserted island; survivors must form a community to stay alive; each character is presented with the opportunity to start anew, yet must confront old demons... how will they react? How will they grow? What will the community look like? Factions? Peace? War? Love? Happiness? Rescue? Home? Everything a writer could possibly want to explore the emotional psyche of dozens of characters - complete with flashbacks to the old life and challenges in the new. In fact, this sort of tale is not new: Swiss Family Robinson, Lord of the Flies, Robinson Crusoe, (heh, even Lost in Space... all the great shipwreck stories require a Robinson, it appears) etc. It is a perfectly compelling setting for whatever Character development/sociological experiment you want to explore. They did not do that. They made a mystery in which the Island _was_ a character. The Island made them do things. The Island had mysterious powers. The Island had secrets. The Island was a fuck-ton more interesting than that pathetic doctor with pretend daddy issues who had to die for the show to end. So, even with all the mewling about the meaningful character focus, you cannot call this a "good" ending because they didn't provide denouement for a (the?) main character: The Island. Nobody says that you have to have polar bears, smoke monsters, resurrection (multiple times), miraculous healing, immortality and time travel to write a compelling character drama - but if you do... then finish the job. p.s. Anyone else notice that the Glowy Life Well was of human construction? Who carved that? Why didn't they become smoke monsters? (Really, for all the importance that the Smoke monster had - can you think of anything less coherently explained?) How did they discover the Glowy place? What did they think it was, and why build a pool for the water? Is the water in the Glowy pool connected to the Water in the Temple? Why did it not heal Jack when it flowed over him? Even in the finale they cannot help but add new mysteries because they really didn't have any answers for which the mysteries were the set-up. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Merusk on May 24, 2010, 04:50:06 PM Here's an easy way around the real-world issues that kept 'the black people' :oh_i_see: out of Lostgatory.
Eko wasn't there because the island wasn't the most important part of his life, just where it ended. He didn't do anything on the island but act badass. His story showed that if he's anywhere, he's in a purgatory trying to resolve the sins committed as a fake priest. Michael, as mentioned, has a lot of bad ju-ju to still burn off and unresolved issues. I'd also argue the island wasn't the most central/ important part of his life it was his relationship with his son. He's off somewhere trying to make amends for that. The island on my made them worse because it took him away from his son. It's the last group of folks he'd want to see after death. The complaints I'm seeing are from those who want answers. Sometimes you just don't get answers. Were they important in the end? Nope. Life's a bitch not all questions get answers. I'm ok with that and wish more shows did it in the same way I wish more movies would let the hero fail. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 24, 2010, 05:15:22 PM I'm not buying the "It's a character drama" bullshit. If they wanted to write a character drama, they could have done so: Plane crashes on deserted island; survivors must form a community to stay alive; each character is presented with the opportunity to start anew, yet must confront old demons... how will they react? How will they grow? What will the community look like? Factions? Peace? War? Love? Happiness? Rescue? Home? Everything a writer could possibly want to explore the emotional psyche of dozens of characters - complete with flashbacks to the old life and challenges in the new. March, but you just wrote a perfect description of Lost Season One :awesome_for_real: Then, they decided to "push the envelope" by exploring other storytelling devices, themes etc. I think the debate will rage for A LOT of time (months and years), if they succeeded or not in their attempt :). And yes, like Merusk wrote, "life's a bitch". Appropriately, the Island was really the "Heart" of the Journey of our Characters. And again, in the following days, months and years, people will be on different sides, neither of which, IMO, is wrong. Let me see, maybe I'm picking a wrong example, but imagine LOST really as a fairy tale story: - One approach is, while you granny narrates it, "why this character did so and so"? Where did they go? What was that strange thing in the forest? Then you also try to grasp the final message the author put in the book, but you STILL want to know the details, because well, you're just like that as a person, no problem. - Another is just trying to grasp that final message: yes, you understand more details could have been given, but hey, everything that was narrated during the tale, in the end, just serve that final message the author wanted to communicate with his book. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 24, 2010, 05:21:27 PM You've got it backwards Paelos. The it was the shows creators who negotiated the ABC execs into setting an end date. The problems with season 3 came from the fact that there was no end in sight for the show, and so they couldn't reveal too much or advance to plot too far. By getting the execs to set an end date, then they could control the flow. The executives just wanted it to run it endlessly until it didn't make anymore money and then cancel it, like every other normal television show. No matter who brought about the change, execs or writers, I can't honestly believe the plan from go was: First 3 Seasons: Crash Here There Be Monsters! Hatch Numbers Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalt! Dharma Initiative Others... The Final Countdown Prison Island Henry Gale is Benjamin Linus Hold Still While I Gas You How the Other Half Lives Not Penny's Boat Start Season 4: Fucking Flash Forwards Constant Time Travel? On the Good Ship Lollipop with Michael Mercs Kill Punky Brewster Giant Wheels and Disappearing Islands Let's do the Time Warp Again, and Again, and Again Random Hydrogen Bomb Zombie Locke Back to the 70s Everyone has Daddy Issues I See Dead People Here's Jacob, Oh wait nevermind he's dead Sideways, Candidates, and Lighthouses, oh my! Who's the bigger dick? Smokey or Jacob? Go into the Light, maybe. On the one hand, there's a sort of progression up to Season Three suggesting a showdown of some kind between all the warring factions involved with the island. Then, the show goes off the fucking rails. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Tarami on May 24, 2010, 06:02:14 PM March, but you just wrote a perfect description of Lost Season One :awesome_for_real: Season one is a character drama? Season one (in like the first six god-damn episodes) was the one that introduced the smoke monsters, Locke magically being able to walk again, the polar bears, the hatches and the mysterious sequences of numbers in the first place, things that went unexplained for the entire run. (Wait, maybe the polar bear was explained. Survivor from another crash or something? Yes, apparently polar bears survive on tropical islands.) The only thing the characters did was being mortifyingly retarded from the second they crashed, just in order to advance the motley plot. No, it was pretty obvious from the very beginning that they were going to go off-rails in a manner that would make David Lynch embarrassed. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 24, 2010, 06:14:53 PM Yes, S1 introduced lots of mysteries but S1 also:
- dedicated one or two episodes to each character. Those episodes presented a certain situation that specific character (maybe with the help of others) had to face/solve. After that, the storytelling brought us back in time (flashbacks) explaining in more detail the traits of that specific character, what tribulations he went through in the past that made him the character which is now in front of us on the island. Then, the story went on, with the character attempting to solve his personal trial, meanwhile growing as a person. And that actually went on for 2 seasons and half, but meanwhile, other elements were introduced, like the Dharma Initiative. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Ratman_tf on May 24, 2010, 06:59:00 PM I blame fucking nuBSG. The clever writer mantra now is "If you can't think up a decent ending for your series, throw some mystical feel good bullshit at them and hope that at least half the audience buys it."
:facepalm: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 24, 2010, 07:00:54 PM I blame the Sopranos for this nonsense as well. It's still the gold-standard for how to ruin a series with an ending.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 24, 2010, 07:01:55 PM Lost was a heavily mystery driven plot line with a very interesting character building flashback mechanism. It was both a character driven show and a plot driven show. It didn't become a solely character driven show until the flash forwards, and finally Season 6.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 24, 2010, 07:07:45 PM The complaints I'm seeing are from those who want answers. Sometimes you just don't get answers. Were they important in the end? Nope. Life's a bitch not all questions get answers. I'm ok with that and wish more shows did it in the same way I wish more movies would let the hero fail. Yes, they were important in the end. A large part of the show was seeking the answers. I hate the "people shouldn't expect all the little twists and turns to get answered" response. I'm not. The problem is that they didn't explain ANYTHING. They left all the main plot basically unanswered, and what explanations they did give were horrible and half ass. Imagine if The Usual Suspects ended with the cops just sitting around going, "Damn, guess we'll never know what happened." Or the end of Seven fading to black as the the delivery van drives up in the desert (its up to each viewer to determine what could have been in the box).This whole approach is a very cliched ending to do. Everybody is doing it lately because writing endings are hard (ask Neil Stephenson). It's a lazy way out of a hard situation, pure and simple. They just aren't good enough writers to write a full good story. Again, I thought the very end was touching. I'd just prefer they made it the main part of the main plot instead of some random thing that had nothing to do with anything. Show should have ended in Season 3, with that scene at the end playing out except with everybody on the island. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Quinton on May 24, 2010, 07:12:51 PM I still think one of their mistakes was trying to explain too much. I don't think we really needed the jacob/mib backstory (especially when it just serves to show that they actually don't *know* why -- they're just doing what they're doing because of "mom"), nor did we necessarily need to see the source of the glowy light, etc.
The "Jacob and his friend have been on the island a long time and have this bet about the nature of humanity" backstory felt like enough to hang things around without trying to take it a step further somehow. We spent 4-5 years leaning about these people and their motivations (through flashbacks and the on-island stories) and what they care about -- let them take sides in this conflict, let it play out, and some of them leave and some of them stay, and in the end, maybe we never learn if it *really* mattered (would unlocke leaving end the world? nobody actually knows). I think I feel like they should have had a shift in season 5 or 6 away from expanding the layers upon layers of crazy happenings and events, turned things around and showed us what happened to all these characters we have followed. I think the writers didn't know how to do this -- how to change the nature of the show so they could wrap it up without losing the audience, so they just kept going... and then "tied it up" with the last episode. EDIT: The thing is, even tough S5/S6 were a mess, things like seeing our castaways try to make a go of it in DharmaVille in the 70s and a lot of the other steps along the way were great fun. I really liked most of these characters. I feel let down that the story didn't do more for them. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Tebonas on May 25, 2010, 01:10:49 AM Yes, it was a copout. But given the mess they have written themself into, I liked it.
The Sideways reality being Purgatory worked on an emotional level, they could give everybody a happy reunion without making any of the sacrifices moot. Despite Ben not deserving such a happy ending I liked the Hurley/Ben guardian combo. As suspected, the one true couple were Rose and Bernard, and they were the smart ones as well realizing one should evade all those wackos so that you don't die in a redshirt incident. From the Lore perspective on the other hand this was a total mess. They forgot things, didn't answer other things, and made new mysteries up on the spot. That was totally annoying. Starting from the Walt thing (wasn't there supposed to be a already filmed scene between Walt and Locke?), many things were a waste of time in retrospect. Too many to list here, I suspect. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: UnSub on May 25, 2010, 02:33:54 AM I always like going back and reading the first few pages of these threads. It reminded me that the writers / creators were made statements that the Island wasn't Purgatory.
:grin: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: TripleDES on May 25, 2010, 02:42:07 AM The first bunch of seasons were cool, since they were still unfolding everything and didn't make you question the quality of the mystery yet.
But now after the finale? Sure, it was all about protecting the damn island. Except, the island is what exactly? Apart from having a fucking light with no known purpose apart from causing earthquakes? I guess I didn't pay enough attention anymore, especially that since season 4, there were always more and more forced conflicts, with new groups showing up from god knows where. Always when it seemed there were finally some answers coming, a new faction shows up and ruins everyone's shit. Just like that fucking temple in this season. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Tebonas on May 25, 2010, 02:59:37 AM I always like going back and reading the first few pages of these threads. It reminded me that the writers / creators were made statements that the Island wasn't Purgatory. :grin: Which is completely true, because the Sideways reality was Purgatory, and everybody that survived the crash was still alive until they died of different causes. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 25, 2010, 03:57:10 AM everybody that survived the crash was still alive until they died of different causes. Your comment prompted me to think how lucky they were surviving the plane crash (http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_deaths). :drillf: Quote Roughly 253 people die in the initial crash of Oceanic Flight 815. The only survivors are in the middle section, the tail and the cockpit, all of which land in different places. Gary Troup is sucked into one of the plane's engine and dies Captain Seth Norris is killed by The Monster. Edward Mars, severely injured in the crash, is euthanized by Jack. Barbara Joanna Miller drowns in a riptide. Scott Jackson is killed, presumably by Ethan Boone Carlyle falls in the drug smugglers' plane and dies of an internal hemorrhage Dr. Leslie Arzt is blown up while handling dynamite. Shannon Rutherford is accidentally shot by Ana Lucia. Donald dies from an infection of a leg injury. Nathan is killed by Goodwin. Ana Lucia Cortez is shot in the chest by Michael. Libby Smith is accidentally shot by Michael Neil "Frogurt" is burnt to death after being shot with a flaming arrow. Seventeen unnamed crash survivors are killed in the flaming arrow attack Two unnamed crash survivors are blown up Eko Tunde is killed by the Monster Nikki Fernandez and Paulo are accidentally buried alive, having been found paralysed and presumed dead. Charlie Pace drowns as a result of the detonation Doug, Jerome and an unnamed female crash survivor are killed by Keamy or one of his men. An unnamed woman goes missing and is presumably killed as well. Michael Dawson dies in the Kahana explosion. Ben strangles John Locke to death. Sayid Jarrah is blown up with C4 saving his friends Sun Kwon and Jin Kwon drown in the submarine explosion Jack Shephard is stabbed by The Man in Black and later dies from his wounds after repairing The Source Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Sir T on May 25, 2010, 03:59:44 AM I read an apt description this morning. It talked about battered viewers syndrome. It lied to us, insulted us, but you still went back again and again looking for that spark of true love that you just knew was there, dammit. And when it finally left you in the lurch, you feel empty. :grin:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 25, 2010, 04:51:52 AM Unanswered Lost Questions (http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1936291)
Again, only posting because I thought it was funny. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 25, 2010, 05:59:14 AM Fuck this show, i'm done with it, I wont be watching any more.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Vaiti on May 25, 2010, 06:17:56 AM I always like going back and reading the first few pages of these threads. It reminded me that the writers / creators were made statements that the Island wasn't Purgatory. :grin: Which is completely true, because the Sideways reality was Purgatory, and everybody that survived the crash was still alive until they died of different causes. That just made me realize exactly how much square hole round pegging they did here to make it fit. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: March on May 25, 2010, 07:12:15 AM I always like going back and reading the first few pages of these threads. It reminded me that the writers / creators were made statements that the Island wasn't Purgatory. :grin: Which is completely true, because the Sideways reality was Purgatory, and everybody that survived the crash was still alive until they died of different causes. Except we were led to believe the "sideways" reality was created by Juliette detonating a nuclear bomb on the "real" island at the feet of the "real" survivors in a "real" point in time which really would have killed them (a few times over)... but no, that propelled them back into the future. And, "it worked" - we were told. but now the nuclear bomb event doesn't make sense because the sideways reality is outside time/space and exists without regard to the bomb. So, it didn't "work" - at least not in the way we were led to believe. Unless they all died in a nuclear explosion at that time and went "sideways" but then the whole of season six is predicated on them surviving the explosion. So, either they died in the explosion (clearly not the case, given s6) or they set-up an arc that they abandoned _during_ the climactic writing of their ending. The sideways reality, is probably the least thought-out of the mysteries, precisely because it has nothing to do with anything they ever wrote, and dollars-to-doughnuts the whole notion was hastily concocted at the time they wrote season six. The island as purgatory could have made sense; I suspect it did make sense, and it probably was the original arc (esp w/Ekko)...but it seems they caught a tiger by its tail and lost whatever coherence they might have originally conceived. It is precisely the "internal" incoherencies that are sloppy... because those are the things they, the writers, can control. So, no, it is not "deep" and it is not a genius stroke of master story-telling. Simple answer: this is the way JJ Abrams and his ilk work... they read the feedback of their audience, and try to write things precisely to confound the audience. Fine... makes for a fun cat and mouse game; Alias was kinda fun too, in that way (until it became mind crushingly stupid). But honestly, that kind of writing is C-grade at best. If you want to earn high marks, then you need to be smarter than your audience and spin order out of chaos - then you'll impress me with your genius. Otherwise you are just hacks with a TV show and an Internet connection. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Vaiti on May 25, 2010, 07:28:32 AM Except we were led to believe the "sideways" reality was created by Juliette detonating a nuclear bomb on the "real" island at the feet of the "real" survivors in a "real" point in time which really would have killed them (a few times over)... but no, that propelled them back into the future. And, "it worked" - we were told. but now the nuclear bomb event doesn't make sense because the sideways reality is outside time/space and exists without regard to the bomb. So, it didn't "work" - at least not in the way we were led to believe. Unless they all died in a nuclear explosion at that time and went "sideways" but then the whole of season six is predicated on them surviving the explosion. So, either they died in the explosion (clearly not the case, given s6) or they set-up an arc that they abandoned _during_ the climactic writing of their ending. The sideways reality, is probably the least thought-out of the mysteries, precisely because it has nothing to do with anything they ever wrote, and dollars-to-doughnuts the whole notion was hastily concocted at the time they wrote season six. The island as purgatory could have made sense; I suspect it did make sense, and it probably was the original arc (esp w/Ekko)...but it seems they caught a tiger by its tail and lost whatever coherence they might have originally conceived. It is precisely the "internal" incoherencies that are sloppy... because those are the things they, the writers, can control. So, no, it is not "deep" and it is not a genius stroke of master story-telling. Simple answer: this is the way JJ Abrams and his ilk work... they read the feedback of their audience, and try to write things precisely to confound the audience. Fine... makes for a fun cat and mouse game; Alias was kinda fun too, in that way (until it became mind crushingly stupid). But honestly, that kind of writing is C-grade at best. If you want to earn high marks, then you need to be smarter than your audience and spin order out of chaos - then you'll impress me with your genius. Otherwise you are just hacks with a TV show and an Internet connection. I :heart: u. Everything you've said is exactly what I think most of us feel but have been unable to articulate as well. To cut off the the incoming Lostpoligist responce or the "LEAVE THE Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: AcidCat on May 25, 2010, 07:30:08 AM So, it didn't "work" - at least not in the way we were led to believe. Yes clearly the bomb instigating a parallel universe was a total red herring - and there have been plenty on the show - to mislead the audience so the revelation of "sideways purgatory" would be a suprise. There has always been an element of misdirection on the show. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: AcidCat on May 25, 2010, 07:31:54 AM keep in mind we tend to think about things harder when we are invested and interested in them. All this criticism you can basically interpret as love for the show. Well there's love and then there's obsessive love. I think a lot of fans over-analyze things to the point where they ruin their own enjoyment and immersion. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Vaiti on May 25, 2010, 07:37:47 AM Perhaps. But is that really so bad?
My wife calls me out my bullshit all the time. (bad example) I still enjoyed the show regardless of the ending. I still watched every show. I just won't give them a free pass. And this show kind of nurtured and encouraged that kind of over-analyze don't you think? So using it as a defense falls on deaf ears abit. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: UnSub on May 25, 2010, 07:42:14 AM There has always been an element of misdirection on the show. Misdirection implies that the truth was there if you only looked closely enough or weren't distracted by the things that were waved in front of you. Viewers weren't misdirected in "Lost" so much as buried in possibly important plot thread after possibly important plot thread until pretty much anything could be justified. "Lost" had a great start. But every new bit lumped in more new characters that got some time in the sun and the whole show went on too long. People complain about the unsatisfactory ending to "The Prisoner" (original) but that was a fairly tight two seasons. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 25, 2010, 07:44:23 AM Actually, yes, at the beginning of LAX, we are led to believe that it worked, but once we see some of the characters on present-day Island, we immediately notice that something is quite amiss.
One of the mantras of S5, also explicated by an episode title, was "Whatever Happened, happened", and infact the detonation of the Hydrogen Bomb, in the end, is the infamous incident Chang talks about in the Orientation video (S2). From a sci-fi point of view, the nuclear bomb acted as a huge "slingshot" for some of the Losties, shooting them in the future, because of the interaction with the pocket of magnetic energy: basically, an uncontrolled use of it (as opposed to the controlled use when operating the underground Wheel). Even if it's not, you can still view the Island as a symbolic Purgatory. After all, at the end of the show, Christian says that it was the most important place Jack visited on his Journey, and where he met the most significant people, a place where, after alll, he sustained the most difficult trials. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: March on May 25, 2010, 07:57:04 AM You are just an enabler. There's therapy for that, you know. :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 25, 2010, 08:08:00 AM You are just an enabler. There's therapy for that, you know. :why_so_serious: Don't worry. Jacob loves you too. :pedobear: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 25, 2010, 11:21:27 AM Yeah, pretty much agree with March. Biggest problem with this last season (or few, really) is that it was pretty obvious they kept re-writing the entire plot the whole way through. There were so many obvious started then abandoned plot path's. Much like the last season of BSG. I'm still baffled how they struggled to write out the final half the way they did when they knew the exact date the show was going to end over 3 years in advance.
I never listened to the podcasts. Are they like the episode commentary podcast that Moore did for BSG? There was a lot of interesting insight in those, because he would talk about all the different plot points they had written or discussed before settling on what actually happened that episode. Was interesting to hear him talk about the plot arc's that could have been, and plot threads that were started and abandoned. They even put up podcasts from some of the writing summits, where they brainstormed ideas for the next season. Did they do anything like that for lost? With discussion of the writing process and changes they made? Would be interesting to hear. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 25, 2010, 01:15:56 PM Apparently this is from one of the writers on Lost. I think it was originally posted on Lostpedia or whatever that site is.
--- I'm still calling bullshit though. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 25, 2010, 01:43:32 PM The show peaked at the hatch.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 01:47:09 PM The show peaked at the hatch. I think I have to agree there. Dharma was a much better mystery than Jacob. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: HaemishM on May 25, 2010, 01:55:37 PM I like that writers explanation. I never much thought about Jacob being the one to bring the Dharma initiative in.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 25, 2010, 02:01:36 PM The whole Lost story reminds me of FFXIII's story. It was confusing as shit and you need to bring in other source material to explain it for you just to make some sort of vague sense.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 02:03:13 PM I like that writers explanation. I never much thought about Jacob being the one to bring the Dharma initiative in. I don't entirely buy that explanation, since Dharma was essentially at war with the Others. If Jacob brought Dharma in, I would think he would have done it through Richard, and Richard (and therefore the Others) would have some sort of friendly relationship with Dharma as a result.There also hasn't been any explanation of how exactly Smokey "tricked" Ben and the Others into wiping out Dharma. I mean, Jacob recruited Richard precisely so that he'd be able to have a voice among humanity and counter Smokey's tricks. Shouldn't he have spoken up and said "hey, Jacob actually said you should NOT do evil things"? Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: March on May 25, 2010, 02:05:25 PM Apparently this is from one of the writers on Lost. I think it was originally posted on Lostpedia or whatever that site is. --- I'm still calling bullshit though. C-grade writers. QED. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 02:09:18 PM Also, the "Smokey was using the Others to try to kill the candidates" is complete bullshit. The Others could have killed all of the "Lostaways" at any time. They even had pretty much all of them held captive at one point or another. If they were taking marching orders from Smokey and there was nothing in the rules stopping them from killing the candidates, all the candidates would have died halfway through Season 1.
(edit) The more I try to figure out what the fuck the Others' motivation was at any point in time the less satisfying it all gets. That was one of the big mysteries I was hoping would get resolved in the last season, and if anything everything they did makes LESS sense in retrospect. Bah. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 25, 2010, 02:39:17 PM Yeah, its obvious they originally intended completely different things for the others and the Dharma initiative, and now are trying to shoehorn it all into the Jacob thing which came much later.
Still, I appreciate the writers explanations (even if a lot of it is retcon). Helps be enjoy the final better. I do think its very cool that what we saw was the original ending, if they aren't bullshitting. I'm curious if they had originally intended for the island itself to be purgatory when they originally wrote it, and then decided to do the flash sideways after deciding to make the Island real. Can you link the original post of that? Got any other good links from writers? Again, I'm interested in seeing them talk about the progression of the story from behind the scenes. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: KallDrexx on May 25, 2010, 02:43:17 PM ... I do think its very cool that what we saw was the original ending, if they aren't bullshitting. They probably aren't bullshitting. Look at where they say the original ending starts. They literally could have applied that ending no matter what the show went like. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 25, 2010, 02:46:05 PM Yeah, exactly. Which is why I wonder if the island itself was originally suppose to be purgatory, as everybody originally hypothesized.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 02:50:13 PM Yeah, exactly. Which is why I wonder if the island itself was originally suppose to be purgatory, as everybody originally hypothesized. A bunch of people crash landing at the foot of something resembling Mount Purgatory from the Divine Comedy and not knowing what the fuck was going on until they eventually finished climbing to the top and saw Paradise could make for a pretty cool show, actually. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Tarami on May 25, 2010, 02:51:11 PM C-grade writers. QED. But A-grade Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: HaemishM on May 25, 2010, 03:08:41 PM I like that writers explanation. I never much thought about Jacob being the one to bring the Dharma initiative in. I don't entirely buy that explanation, since Dharma was essentially at war with the Others. If Jacob brought Dharma in, I would think he would have done it through Richard, and Richard (and therefore the Others) would have some sort of friendly relationship with Dharma as a result.Not necessarily. Keep in mind there seems to be a time where Jacob just disappeared from the island - he was supposedly living in the cabin that Ben kept coming to, but Jacob wasn't there. Ben never saw him there. Ben was led to the Others by the Smoke Monster masquerading as his dead mother. Richard brought Ben to the temple where he was revived after being shot. Dogan must have been in the temple at the time the Dharma massacre took place, and I can reasonably assume that Dogan probably ordered the massacre after realizing that Dharma had succumbed to the corruption. Was the Dharma Initiative sent to the island by Widmore? If so, his expulsion from the Others would have put their backs up about the Dharma people in the first place. Quote There also hasn't been any explanation of how exactly Smokey "tricked" Ben and the Others into wiping out Dharma. I mean, Jacob recruited Richard precisely so that he'd be able to have a voice among humanity and counter Smokey's tricks. Shouldn't he have spoken up and said "hey, Jacob actually said you should NOT do evil things"? Richard wasn't the leader of the Others and was often working FOR the leader, who supposedly took orders from Jacob (though in Ben's case, we know it wasn't Jacob but Smokey). And Jacob didn't have rules against killing people - hell, he often did very bad things in the quest to get someone to kill MIB for real. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 25, 2010, 03:12:30 PM The Jack waking and Jack dying scenes in the same location they maybe had written, I'm sorry but the rest of it was random shit that seemed like a good idea at the time. Mostly enjoyable shit, I lost a lot of interest after the hatch season, but still complete random shit. There's whole episodes that don't make any kind of sense now, Adam and Eve in the cave, Jack reckoned they had been there about 50 years based on their clothes, turns out 2000 years.
I don't have a problem with anyone saying the show was good but there's a bloody good reason the head writers won't be answering specific questions about the plot any time soon. I'm not interested enough to listen to pod casts or whatever, but thinking back to the Polar bear and the comic, I'm pretty sure that the whole Dharma Initiative was invented just to transport Polar bears to a tropical island. Given that another possible answer was that the Polar bear was there because Walt imagined it into existence, it sure seems odd that in the final season magic happens because of what people believe. Dharma Initiative was cool and all but seems to me that some people are twisting themselves in knots trying to explain all this nonsense. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 25, 2010, 03:33:04 PM 10 years from now, after they've made their millions or whatever and people have stopped caring, I want one of the writers to just admit the truth we all know.
They were flying by the seat of their pants, and the show became something they never intended by the time it ended. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Ironwood on May 25, 2010, 03:44:48 PM I didn't mind it.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: AcidCat on May 25, 2010, 03:55:08 PM They were flying by the seat of their pants, and the show became something they never intended by the time it ended. Honestly it doesn't even matter to me if most of it was improv. It sure was entertaining. Oh, and "the reason Ben's not in the church, and the reason no one is in the church but for Season 1 people is because they wrote the ending to the show after writing the pilot. And never changed it." is obviously bullshit because Desmond, Penny, and Juliet were also in the church. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Merusk on May 25, 2010, 05:11:06 PM The butthurt is amusing, let them continue to rant.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 05:28:53 PM Richard wasn't the leader of the Others and was often working FOR the leader, who supposedly took orders from Jacob (though in Ben's case, we know it wasn't Jacob but Smokey). Negative. Ben said at one point to Locke (or maybe it was fake-Locke, I forget now) that he'd never actually spoken to Jacob, and he was butthurt because Locke got to and he didn't. According to Richard's origin story in s6, his purpose was to talk to people on Jacob's behalf. Maybe not "lead" them, but he was supposed to be the voice of Jacob, and presumably "advise" the leaders of the Others based on what Jacob told him. That was his whole purpose in life. But I suspect the writers didn't come up with that purpose until s6, and prior to that point they just had Richard down as "mysterious immortal guy with eyeliner and no particular agenda", which is why that explanation doesn't actually match up with anything he did in previous seasons. Bleh. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Vaiti on May 25, 2010, 05:49:26 PM Quote Remember when Michael appeared to Hurley, he said he was not allowed to leave the Island. Just like the MIB. He wasn't allowed into this sideways world and thus, was not afforded the opportunity to move on. Why? Because he had proven himself to be unworthy with his actions on the Island. He failed the test. The others, passed. They made it into Sideways world when they died Keamy. :why_so_serious: If that was from one of the writers, then he didn't watch the show he was writing. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 25, 2010, 05:59:43 PM then he didn't watch the show he was writing. Would that surprise you? Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 06:07:40 PM The mechanics of the sideways/purgatory world suggest to me that it was entirely constructed for the benefit of the main characters; all the other "people" in that world are figments of their imagination. Jack's son, for sure, and I would guess any characters that they didn't bother to "awaken". The thing from the "writer" that suggests that the purgatory world is someplace everyone goes to doesn't make as much sense to me since everything in that world seemed to revolve around the main characters (i.e. everything had been rearranged to give them all relatively happy existences that would help them find peace, or something).
For example, I would guess that the "real" people in purgatory couldn't die (being already dead), which is why Desmond happily whacked Locke with his car without any fear of killing him and messing the whole thing up. But "imaginary" people who were basically just stage props to help the real people work their issues out could die just fine, like Keamy. The main question this leaves is who all was real and who wasn't. For example, was the newborn Aaron in purgatory real, or was he a prop? If he has to spend his afterlife as a one day old baby just because that was when he was on the island with his mom, that's kinda fucked up IMO; he never gets to reunite with his soulmate then. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Rishathra on May 25, 2010, 07:20:42 PM According to Richard's origin story in s6, his purpose was to talk to people on Jacob's behalf. Maybe not "lead" them, but he was supposed to be the voice of Jacob, and presumably "advise" the leaders of the Others based on what Jacob told him. That was his whole purpose in life. But I suspect the writers didn't come up with that purpose until s6, and prior to that point they just had Richard down as "mysterious immortal guy with eyeliner and no particular agenda", which is why that explanation doesn't actually match up with anything he did in previous seasons. Bleh. Actually it was pointed out pretty early on that Richard was an 'advisor of sorts' to the Others, and that he had been around for a long time. Long before season six, at least, and not long after his character's introduction. As to the nature of the sideways, to me the statement, "there is no now, here" sums it up well enough. Why wasn't <insert character here> in the church? Because this wasn't necessarily the group of people that was most important to them. In fact, I think that we can include Jack's dad in this group. To me, that final scene played out in a way that suggested he was merely there as a guide, and that he had already himself moved on. "Already" being a somewhat nebulous term, of course. I'm in agreement with most here that the handling of the overall story arc and the various plotlines and mysteries was handled atrociously, but ultimately, I'm still happy with how they handled the characters themselves. The finale gave me a nice chance to say goodbye to them. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 25, 2010, 08:05:46 PM I still don't see how people are satisfied with the characters. You got a hamhanded mushy ending where everyone was happy! Yay? Jack died! Oh wait he lived! Who gives a shit! They took out all the emotional punch of the "Jack eyes close for the last time" because you know he's in heaven fucking Kate.
Edit: Oh and Choose your own answer. (http://www.chooseyourownlost.com/) Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 25, 2010, 08:35:54 PM Actually it was pointed out pretty early on that Richard was an 'advisor of sorts' to the Others, and that he had been around for a long time. Long before season six, at least, and not long after his character's introduction. Yes, but I can't think of any instances where we see him offering any advice that seems to further Jacob's supposed goals. On the other hand, I can think of a few cases where if he WAS passing advice from Jacob to the Others, they would have done different things than what they did. Like spending two seasons being giant assholes to the candidates for no apparent reason (but not killing them like they would be if they were somehow taking advice from Smokey instead). Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 25, 2010, 09:24:50 PM I still don't see how people are satisfied with the characters. You got a hamhanded mushy ending where everyone was happy! Yay? Jack died! Oh wait he lived! Who gives a shit! They took out all the emotional punch of the "Jack eyes close for the last time" because you know he's in heaven fucking Kate. Eh, I think that's a bit harsh. While I've been bashing on the ending a lot, I still liked the purgatory way out. I was pissed and upset with them killing off some of the people they did, and it was nice to just give everybody a sort of happy ending (I mean, for fuck sake, most of them still died violent deaths). It didn't take away the emotional impact of the end for me when Jack died.Edit: Oh and Choose your own answer. (http://www.chooseyourownlost.com/) Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Ironwood on May 26, 2010, 03:52:18 AM Still not sure why you would run someone down in your car in heaven.
:oh_i_see: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 26, 2010, 06:53:29 AM Still not sure why you would run someone down in your car in heaven. :oh_i_see: Insurance scam. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 26, 2010, 07:54:45 AM I still don't see how people are satisfied with the characters. You got a hamhanded mushy ending where everyone was happy! Yay? Jack died! Oh wait he lived! Who gives a shit! They took out all the emotional punch of the "Jack eyes close for the last time" because you know he's in heaven fucking Kate. Eh, I think that's a bit harsh. While I've been bashing on the ending a lot, I still liked the purgatory way out. I was pissed and upset with them killing off some of the people they did, and it was nice to just give everybody a sort of happy ending (I mean, for fuck sake, most of them still died violent deaths). It didn't take away the emotional impact of the end for me when Jack died.Edit: Oh and Choose your own answer. (http://www.chooseyourownlost.com/) How is there any emotion in what happens on the island when you know they're all happy in the afterlife. It just cheapens the whole Lost on the Island experience. (I'm getting very close to a death penalty in MMOGs argument) As soon as I figured out everyone was going to heaven (except black people) I really didn't care what happened on the island or if they died or lived. It really didn't matter. I felt like I got taken for an idiot and was force fed a happy ending to make me feel better about myself. Meh. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 26, 2010, 08:27:37 AM Just as a point of advice, don't give any eulogies. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 26, 2010, 08:56:18 AM :grin:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 26, 2010, 09:04:33 AM Just as a point of advice, don't give any eulogies. :awesome_for_real: Haha, yeah, that's what I was thinking. I mean, knowing your love ones are off in heaven doesn't really take away the sting at all that their dead. :-PWouldn't you just assume Jack would be off fucking Kate in heaven anyways, even if they didn't show the afterlife stuff? Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: HaemishM on May 26, 2010, 09:08:25 AM As soon as I figured out everyone was going to heaven (except black people) I really didn't care what happened on the island or if they died or lived. Except everyone didn't go to heaven. Michael was still on the island working out his stuff. Keamy didn't go to heaven, and apparently spends purgatory being shot by people. The man in black wasn't in purgatory, nor was Jacob. A lot of the Others (Dogan, Tom) didn't go to heaven though they may eventually work their way there if they can accept their lives and deaths. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 26, 2010, 09:52:37 AM As soon as I figured out everyone was going to heaven (except black people) I really didn't care what happened on the island or if they died or lived. Except everyone didn't go to heaven. Michael was still on the island working out his stuff. Keamy didn't go to heaven, and apparently spends purgatory being shot by people. The man in black wasn't in purgatory, nor was Jacob. A lot of the Others (Dogan, Tom) didn't go to heaven though they may eventually work their way there if they can accept their lives and deaths. Maybe you can list a bunch of other characters no one cares about. I mean really, Keamy? Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Soln on May 26, 2010, 09:53:23 AM The show peaked at the hatch. I think I have to agree there. Dharma was a much better mystery than Jacob. yeah have to also agree Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Special J on May 26, 2010, 10:33:03 AM Maybe you can list a bunch of other characters no one cares about. I mean really, Keamy? George Minkowski? :why_so_serious: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: tazelbain on May 26, 2010, 10:41:17 AM Kate Austin.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Teleku on May 26, 2010, 11:27:06 AM As soon as I figured out everyone was going to heaven (except black people) I really didn't care what happened on the island or if they died or lived. Except everyone didn't go to heaven. Michael was still on the island working out his stuff. Keamy didn't go to heaven, and apparently spends purgatory being shot by people. The man in black wasn't in purgatory, nor was Jacob. A lot of the Others (Dogan, Tom) didn't go to heaven though they may eventually work their way there if they can accept their lives and deaths. One thing I noticed on my second watch through of the end was the stain glass window in the church. Kind of cool: (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41488/Lost_stainglass_window.jpg) I noticed that the room was filled with idols and trinkets from just about every religion as well. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 26, 2010, 11:37:30 AM Did anyone catch this in the background?
(http://free-stainedglasspatterns.com/3flyingspaghettimonster_btn.jpg) Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 26, 2010, 04:02:09 PM The two main authors of the show (Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse) will be
http://screenrant.com/lost-series-finale-damon-lindelof-aco-61896/ From all of us who made the show, we really hope that you don’t feel it was a waste of your time. We hope that you spent the entire night not just thinking about the finale on a story level, but that you were emotionally affected by it. There are two feelings that you feel when you watch the ending of a television show. The first is the feeling that you have of just understanding that the show is over and the second is what your response is to actually what’s happening on the screen. What I liked about the Soprano’s finale was that it changed the experience because when Chase cut to black, suddenly that feeling of “the show’s over” was replaced by “is my cable out?” – he kind of changed the conversation about it. For us, we tried to write the last two and a half hours of the show so that those two feelings would feel like they were the same thing. So, you’re feeling of saying goodbye to the show – of the show not being around anymore – was actually literally perfectly paralleling what we were showing you on the screen. If you had an experience anything like that, then it was mission accomplished. If you didn’t, we blew it and I apologize. Oh, and by the way, regarding the supposed "writer" who posted a longish interpretation of the finale in a forum, here's a tidbit from DarkUFO (one of the most popular Lost websites out there): Update: 26th May I've spoken to ABC and they have confirmed that this person did use to work for ABC as an Intern but were released 3 years ago. http://lostmediamentions.blogspot.com/2010/05/someone-from-bad-robots-take-on-finale.html Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: MrHat on May 26, 2010, 05:46:46 PM lol
How it should've ended: (http://i.imgur.com/wtzBE.gif) Thank You Internet. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 26, 2010, 06:35:27 PM What I liked about the Soprano’s finale was that it changed the experience because when Chase cut to black, suddenly that feeling of “the show’s over” was replaced by “is my cable out?” – he kind of changed the conversation about it. If I take nothing else away from that quote, this statement alone proves this man is a raving lunatic and shouldn't be allowed to write for anything ever again. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: rattran on May 26, 2010, 07:30:59 PM lol How it should've ended: (http://i.imgur.com/wtzBE.gif) Thank You Internet. Heh, just came to post that. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Samwise on May 26, 2010, 10:51:49 PM I've been cracking up at that goddamn gif for like ten minutes straight now.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Draegan on May 27, 2010, 12:23:49 PM What I liked about the Soprano’s finale was that it changed the experience because when Chase cut to black, suddenly that feeling of “the show’s over” was replaced by “is my cable out?” – he kind of changed the conversation about it. If I take nothing else away from that quote, this statement alone proves this man is a raving lunatic and shouldn't be allowed to write for anything ever again. I knew those two writers were a pair of douchebags but now I know at least one is a dumb asshole too. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: palmer_eldritch on May 27, 2010, 04:23:31 PM The sideways world being purgatory was fine with me, but as others have said it was a separate mystery to all the mysteries we were meant to care about throughout most of the show.
Having watched it all, I still have no idea what the island actually was, what that statue was, what the glowing thing in the water was, how come people came back to life, how come Jacob had the magic powers he seemed to have (seeing as he was just a normal guy apart from not dying?), what the numbers on the lighthouse were all about, why those people were so keen to kidnap Walt and, I dunno, a load of other stuff. I mean, I get that the island and the glowing thing had to survive in order for humanity to survive (is that right?) but I have no idea why. I’m not asking anyone to post the explanations here, just saying. You should have some basic idea what was happening by the end of a show like that, even if there’s plenty left which only the more attentive/smarter viewers will get, or plenty for people to put their own interpretation on. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Sir T on May 27, 2010, 04:54:28 PM I have to compare Lost with another M=ystery based show - Babylon 5. They set up a whole host of mysteries in Season one, why did the Minbari surrender to Earth during the War, why did the previous station vanish, etc. And they began answering all those questions as the show progressed. For instance the answer as to why the Minbari surrendered was answered in the very first episode of Season 2, though it had ramifications that were not fully resolved till the middle of Season 4. At the end all the questions were pretty much answered as they began answering the questions as the show progressed, and using those answers to drive the overall story forward. People might have not have liked some of the answers, but no-one was asking what the hell.
Then again, JMS admitted he changed the story in small ways to fit things together as he went along. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Ratman_tf on May 27, 2010, 07:19:51 PM People might have not have liked some of the answers, but no-one was asking what the hell. B5 is a great example. They left a ton of questions unanswered, but answered the ones they set out at the beginning, and in a way that made sense as they related to the story. I can look back on B5 and say "Yeah, that's what they meant. That's where they were headed." Lost? *snerk* I think the title works on a lot of levels. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: K9 on May 28, 2010, 08:23:09 AM I've been cracking up at that goddamn gif for like ten minutes straight now. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Vaiti on May 28, 2010, 10:03:03 AM Best part of that .gif is the very last frame. The animation rate is too fast on it for you to see it while it's playing, but chrome screwed up the other day on me and .gif's stopped playing right, so it just showed the last frame for me.
It says Lost: The Dream of the Little Yellow Dog :grin: Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: ahoythematey on June 04, 2010, 09:12:17 PM Didn't see this posted.
(http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/138/l_b5296e95fa2d4fd3b1405b7219630035.jpg) I liked the ending. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Miasma on June 04, 2010, 11:00:38 PM Amusing previous post explanation... (http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/insane-clown-posse.php)
I'm also good with the ending. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: HaemishM on June 06, 2010, 09:30:55 AM Goddamn, ICP really sucks monkey balls. :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Ironwood on June 06, 2010, 10:01:39 AM Yeah, but Dick Jones owns ICP and ICP owns the cops.
... You're a cop. *choke* Title: Re: Lost Post by: waffel on July 14, 2010, 09:52:41 PM That has got to be the worse piece of shit I've seen in my life. If anyone is wondering if they should ever watch this show, the answer is, "Don't bother". Fuck. :heartbreak: Well shit, I just watched every episode from all 6 seasons in the span of about 2 months. Around season 3 I read the receptions people had on episodes and decided if I would skip them completely and read reviews (rarely did) or just FF them watching them at 2x speed (kinda fun this way) Season 6 was pretty much FF through most episodes. Mid way through the last episode and I'm pretty sure I just wasted my time completely. edit: hahaha o man. fucking kidding me. In retrospect, the fact I only had to 'connect' with the characters for 2 months isn't bad. I really can't imagine having care about this show for 6 years only to watch it spiral down a drain in the final season. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Furiously on July 28, 2010, 06:54:08 PM Now you can own part of the show!
http://www.profilesinhistory.com/lost-the-auction.html (http://www.profilesinhistory.com/lost-the-auction.html) Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on July 28, 2010, 08:17:24 PM Heh, Dharma Beer. I wonder what kind of beer they put in the cans.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: raydeen on August 01, 2010, 07:17:58 PM Heh, Dharma Beer. I wonder what kind of beer they put in the cans. It's probably 'Billy Beer' with a Dharma label wrapped around it. No other way to get that authentic 1970's taste. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: waffel on August 08, 2010, 05:02:33 PM This may be relevant to some people here:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/celebritology/2010/08/lost_epilogue_leaked_online_an.html Quote The 12-minute epilogue to "Lost," which is included in the DVD box set that releases Aug. 24, leaked online this afternoon. You can get it off *ahem* torrent sites. Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Merusk on March 18, 2011, 10:18:38 AM Yeah it's old, I don't care. Enjoy this vid that makes more sense than the whole series when you think on it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrcF7dYADsw&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=SL Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 24, 2012, 04:39:21 PM Good interview: two years after the final episode, Damon Lindelof talks about the show, its legacy and the infamous last episode (25 minutes video):
http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/21/3030913/damon-lindelof-on-lost-on-the-verge If that's not enough, in this extended version, the writer talks also about a whole lot other stuff (64 minutes long video!) http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/21/3034664/damon-lindelof-extended-interview-On-The-Verge-episode-006 Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Rendakor on May 25, 2012, 12:19:01 AM Is there a transcript somewhere? I'm curious but not curious enough to watch 20-60 mins of video.
Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Lucas on May 25, 2012, 04:48:26 AM Is there a transcript somewhere? I'm curious but not curious enough to watch 20-60 mins of video. Still have to find one; but here is a nice summary :grin: Youtube version of the Lost related portion of the interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5chCMRsEVo Title: Re: Lost [FINALE SPOILERS PAGE 25 ONWARDS] Post by: Paelos on May 25, 2012, 07:15:46 AM I wonder how long I'll have to wait before Lindeloff decides he doesn't want to work in TV anymore and finally tells the truth.
|