Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 01:35:25 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Sports / Fantasy Sports  |  Topic: 2011 College Football 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 36 Go Down Print
Author Topic: 2011 College Football  (Read 258866 times)
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #980 on: November 30, 2011, 05:59:24 PM

Except it isn't. It's a joke pretending to act like a playoff. The only "fair" national championship game we have right now is LSU-Houston, frankly.

If Alabama wanted to go to the party, maybe they should have recruited a kicker?  why so serious?

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
SnakeCharmer
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3807


Reply #981 on: November 30, 2011, 06:01:28 PM

Except it isn't. It's a joke pretending to act like a playoff. The only "fair" national championship game we have right now is LSU-Houston, frankly.

OK now you're being...I dunno what...

Houston?  Just because they're undefeated?  Haha ok.

Quote
If Alabama wanted to go to the party, maybe they should have recruited a kicker?  why so serious?

Or Saban not being a complete dumbass and putting his kickers in those situations  Argh!
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #982 on: November 30, 2011, 06:05:09 PM

You are focusing way too much on the losses and not who the teams beat.
SnakeCharmer
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3807


Reply #983 on: November 30, 2011, 06:09:24 PM

You are focusing way too much on the losses and not who the teams beat.


What?

I'm not the one saying Bama shouldn't play LSU because they already lost to them.

My argument is the rankings.  The other crap I said about the losses was just playing everyone else's game of why Bama shoudn't play in the BCS NCG.
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #984 on: November 30, 2011, 06:21:44 PM

I think what Trippy means is that OK State has way better wins than Alabama.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #985 on: November 30, 2011, 06:22:14 PM

Actually now that I see the BCS rankings I see that Alabama's comp ranking (not that those are "objective" either) is higher than Oklahoma State -- I thought it was the other way around. So I'm okay with LSU being #1 right now and Alabama #2.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #986 on: November 30, 2011, 07:25:49 PM

Nobody except LSU has a really great resume of wins.

That's the reason we'll have a very ridiculous #2 pick. Alabama's best win is going to be Arkansas. OSU's best wins will be K State and Oklahoma if they want to be in the discussion.

Stanford's best win is Notre Dame which is just stupid. VA Tech's best win is GA Tech. Houston's best win is UCLA.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #987 on: November 30, 2011, 07:42:04 PM

Beating the #3 team in the country isn't a bad "best win" to have.   awesome, for real
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #988 on: November 30, 2011, 07:50:21 PM

Beating the #3 team in the country isn't a bad "best win" to have.   awesome, for real

They weren't at the time. In fact I question Arkansas's inclusion in this mess considering their best win is South Carolina.

Then again, Georgia couldn't do that.  Facepalm

I have a feeling this college season will be looked back upon in a very negative light. Sorta like when LSU won the title as a two loss team with one of those as Kentucky.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #989 on: November 30, 2011, 07:54:22 PM

Beating the #3 team in the country isn't a bad "best win" to have.   awesome, for real

They weren't at the time. In fact I question Arkansas's inclusion in this mess considering their best win is South Carolina.

Then again, Georgia couldn't do that.  Facepalm

I have a feeling this college season will be looked back upon in a very negative light. Sorta like when LSU won the title as a two loss team with one of those as Kentucky.

I don't think so, because LSU is going to win the title with 0 losses this year.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #990 on: November 30, 2011, 07:56:06 PM

Oh you don't give us a chance too eh?

That's fine...keep overlooking us....yeeeeeeessssssssss  Oh ho ho ho. Reallllly?

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #991 on: November 30, 2011, 07:59:21 PM

Oh you don't give us a chance too eh?

That's fine...keep overlooking us....yeeeeeeessssssssss  Oh ho ho ho. Reallllly?

A couple of weeks ago I was thinking you were going to give them a good game.  And then you played Kentucky.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #992 on: November 30, 2011, 08:03:53 PM

Hey, they BEAT Tennessee. Kentucky's not that bad of a defense.

I mean they only gave up 35 to LSU.


and 54 to South Carolina and 48 to Florida and 38 to Vandy

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #993 on: November 30, 2011, 08:45:54 PM

Stanford's best win is Notre Dame which is just stupid.
USC
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #994 on: November 30, 2011, 09:28:05 PM

Stanford's best win is Notre Dame which is just stupid.
USC


Doesn't mean shit for the polls though.
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #995 on: November 30, 2011, 10:02:03 PM

Some of the computer rankings include USC.
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #996 on: December 01, 2011, 04:16:18 AM

Some of the computer rankings include USC.


Yes, but while USC is infinitely better than Notre Dame on the field I don't think that beating USC would help them much more in the BCS. 
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #997 on: December 01, 2011, 06:44:15 AM

The other problem is that it was a 3OT win in the 50s, proving that Stanford's defense isn't exactly ready for primetime.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #998 on: December 01, 2011, 06:47:51 AM

I think the discussion was more about Stanford's BCS chances and quality of wins, not necessarily how good they really are.  They have proved to me that they have some really, really good people at a few skill positions but their overall athletic ability is very suspect.  They would get torched by any team with a high level defense. 
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #999 on: December 01, 2011, 10:06:47 AM

Oh I agree that Stanford is overrated. Like who the fucked got picked this year to vote in the Harris poll that would rank Stanford ahead of OSU? Apparently there are other people out there that think it matters more who you lose to than who you beat.
caladein
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3174


WWW
Reply #1000 on: December 01, 2011, 10:08:49 AM

Actually now that I see the BCS rankings I see that Alabama's comp ranking (not that those are "objective" either) is higher than Oklahoma State -- I thought it was the other way around. So I'm okay with LSU being #1 right now and Alabama #2.

They're about even (4-2) and OKST still has Bedlam to play.  The assumption is that a win in that game pulls them even or better.

"Point being, they can't make everyone happy, so I hope they pick me." -Ingmar
"OH MY GOD WE'RE SURROUNDED SEND FOR BACKUP DIG IN DEFENSIVE POSITIONS MAN YOUR NECKBEARDS" -tgr
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #1001 on: December 01, 2011, 10:11:19 AM

Oh I agree that Stanford is overrated. Like who the fucked got picked this year to vote in the Harris poll that would rank Stanford ahead of OSU? Apparently there are other people out there that think it matters more who you lose to than who you beat.


It does matter.  Losing to Iowa State is a lot different than losing to Alabama or LSU.
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12007

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1002 on: December 01, 2011, 10:34:23 AM

If it is Bama and LSU, that will make it yet another SEC team with the crystal football. And I don't see that changing next year considering the age make up of both of these teams as well as Arkansas, SCar, UGA.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #1003 on: December 01, 2011, 10:51:29 AM

The SEC is fully in command of college football and will be so for the foreseeable future.
Tannhauser
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4436


Reply #1004 on: December 01, 2011, 06:12:45 PM

Maybe Urban Meyer, who took the job at Ohio State to spend more time with his family  Ohhhhh, I see. will change that.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #1005 on: December 01, 2011, 07:11:13 PM

Maybe Urban Meyer, who took the job at Ohio State to spend more time with his family  Ohhhhh, I see. will change that.

The downside being that your recruiting base is Ohio, instead of at the heart of one of the best recruiting states in the country.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #1006 on: December 01, 2011, 09:31:04 PM

I'm predicting they get last-year-at-Florida Urban Meyer.   Ohhhhh, I see.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #1007 on: December 02, 2011, 08:42:04 AM

I'm going to pick on the PAC-12 for a moment:

Not only if your inaugural championship game the Ducks v. the lame-ducks, but you're playing it on a Friday? WHAT? That's the day the MAC teams play their games. Totally bush league.

Oh and I can get tickets for $24 on stubhub.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19270


Reply #1008 on: December 02, 2011, 08:47:30 AM

They had to schedule it around Sibling Date Night in SEC country.

When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #1009 on: December 02, 2011, 08:50:12 AM

They had to schedule it around Sibling Date Night in SEC country.

Shouldn't you be celebrating your Seahawks win?

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
SnakeCharmer
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3807


Reply #1010 on: December 03, 2011, 12:43:40 PM

Houston just got plowed by Southern Miss.  Nice.
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #1011 on: December 03, 2011, 03:44:38 PM

LSU up 21-10 with one first down for the game on offense.    Ohhhhh, I see.
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12007

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1012 on: December 03, 2011, 04:31:21 PM

LSU up 21-10 with one first down for the game on offense.    Ohhhhh, I see.

Welcome to Jordan Jefferson. Want him?  Ohhhhh, I see.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #1013 on: December 03, 2011, 06:14:45 PM

LSU up 21-10 with one first down for the game on offense.    Ohhhhh, I see.

Welcome to Jordan Jefferson. Want him?  Ohhhhh, I see.

Are we going to get to hear some more of your whining about how LSU isn't all that good?   awesome, for real
Chimpy
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10633


WWW
Reply #1014 on: December 03, 2011, 06:31:29 PM


Edit:  I don't think any of this will matter because Okie State is going to get the beatdown from Oklahoma this weekend. 

Oh really? 

'Reality' is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 36 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Sports / Fantasy Sports  |  Topic: 2011 College Football  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC