Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 07, 2025, 05:04:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  TV  |  Topic: Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 46 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.  (Read 403679 times)
MahrinSkel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10859

When she crossed over, she was just a ship. But when she came back... she was bullshit!


Reply #1015 on: April 13, 2014, 08:54:44 PM

I like how you think the direct insult is the acme of trolling.  If you want to draw someone into a flame war, try more subtle implications of stupidity, rather than running straight for the four-letter words.  You want to hit someone's insecurities by making them *feel* stupid, rather than just making an easily shrugged off declaration.

--Dave

--Signature Unclear
jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1016 on: April 13, 2014, 10:38:00 PM

And recall, once again, that the pilot had not yet been filmed and the second episode had not yet been written when the showrunners read the Cap 2 script.  The entire first season was built around Cap 2.  Cap 2 did not do anything to this show other than set the stage.

At this point, it appears that there are a few ways in which they failed to synch the show with movie in fine detail, but we're still a few episodes from the end of the season, and they've attempted a few misleads.   We'll have to see how it ends.

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
Tannhauser
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4436


Reply #1017 on: April 15, 2014, 07:10:47 PM

I liked the Hydra parts better than the Shield parts this episode.  Enjoying all the chaos the last episode unleashed. 


Bottom line to me though is the show now keeps my attention and I enjoy it.  They are keeping up a nice urgency with the shows pace which helps greatly.
Threash
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9171


Reply #1018 on: April 15, 2014, 07:22:48 PM


I am the .00000001428%
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1019 on: April 15, 2014, 08:36:03 PM


"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #1020 on: April 15, 2014, 10:57:04 PM

TV episodes generally are written pretty seat-of-the-pants.

I find it hard to believe that the acting and writing choices in the first few episodes were a deliberate plan. It seems much more likely that they produced a few episodes, got feedback on Ward, realized the audience thought he sucked and figured out a fix.

It's like those Lost characters Nikki and Paulo. They were introduced, they were annoying, they were killed off. But they weren't annoying on purpose, that wasn't the plan. Killing them off was just giving the fans what they wanted when the characters didn't hit the way the creators hoped.

That's not really a criticism. Almost every TV show has a "making it up as we go along" element. In many ways that's a good thing, as it can lead to more organic and honest results than trying to stick to a rigid plan. (See "How I Met Your Mother") It's only a big problem for shows that rely or imply some sort of elaborate long-term planning but can't pull it off.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2014, 11:00:04 PM by Margalis »

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
Velorath
Contributor
Posts: 8996


Reply #1021 on: April 15, 2014, 11:07:50 PM

TV episodes generally are written pretty seat-of-the-pants.

I find it hard to believe that the acting and writing choices in the first few episodes were a deliberate plan. It seems much more likely that they produced a few episodes, got feedback on Ward, realized the audience thought he sucked and figured out a fix.

It's like those Lost characters Nikki and Paulo. They were introduced, they were annoying, they were killed off. But they weren't annoying on purpose, that wasn't the plan. Killing them off was just giving the fans what they wanted when the characters didn't hit the way the creators hoped.

I understand what you're saying but I'm not sure if that's the case here. Partly because people seem to complain about Skye a lot more than Ward, so I'm not sure why they'd "fix" his character and not hers. More than that though, if people aren't really digging a particular character/actor and the writers decide they need to do something about it, killing the character off or otherwise writing them out of the story is generally the fix. Giving the character a more prominent role is the opposite of what most writing teams would usually do, especially something tricky like this where they're requiring the actor to essentially play a dual role. The writers would have to have a lot of faith in the actor to do this in response to the audience not liking him, and prior to the last couple episodes, I'm not sure where that faith would have come from.
eldaec
Terracotta Army
Posts: 11844


Reply #1022 on: April 16, 2014, 12:23:15 AM

Feels to me like Ward possibly was planned to be unlikable. Skye was not.

"People will not assume that what they read on the internet is trustworthy or that it carries any particular ­assurance or accuracy" - Lord Leveson
"Hyperbole is a cancer" - Lakov Sanite
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #1023 on: April 16, 2014, 12:59:53 AM

Maybe it's worth distinguishing between writing and acting choices.

I recall a conversation earlier in this thread about who knew what when, to the tune of the writers knew a fair amount about what was to happen in CA2 but the actors didn't know as much. I can believe that there was a plan for Ward to be evil or fake evil - I have trouble believing that his bad acting and unlikable character were actor choices to support that.

Remember back to the pilot - it had a ton of stupid shit. I assume for no reason other than that sometimes TV is bad.

http://www.tvguide.com/News/Agents-SHIELD-Spoilers-Hydra-Clairvoyant-1080215.aspx

According to the producers they had a loose plan and Dalton / Ward wasn't in on it at first.

Quote
Feels to me like Ward possibly was planned to be unlikable. Skye was not.

Skye pretty clearly fits in with Joss Whedon female characters. Super competent waif / martial arts hottie / space hooker ninja with a heart of gold. She's also pretty clearly supposed to be the point of view character, as the outsider introduced to SHIELD along with the viewers. So it's hard to believe that she was intended to be unlikable. It seems like more of trying to jam a square peg into a round hole, where the typical Whedon character just didn't work in this setting.

Ward-style characters aren't as common in Whedon stuff and usually aren't very well done. Riley from Buffy wasn't particularly likable IIRC. (Probably the least likable of male cast members in that period) Hawkeye is bland unlikable nothing in the Avengers. I'm not sure that Whedon can write a straightforward bad ass male without making him bland or a douche.


vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #1024 on: April 16, 2014, 01:15:45 AM

Quote
Hawkeye is bland unlikable nothing in the Avengers. I'm not sure that Whedon can write a straightforward bad ass male without making him bland or a douche.


Can anyone?  why so serious?

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Threash
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9171


Reply #1025 on: April 16, 2014, 07:16:09 AM

Patton Oswalt once again knocks it out of the park as the unlikely badass.

I am the .00000001428%
eldaec
Terracotta Army
Posts: 11844


Reply #1026 on: April 16, 2014, 08:05:06 AM

Wesley and Gunn did fine in Angel.

Malcolm and Jane were good in Firefly.

Also Giles, Spike (only a douche some of the time), Book, and of course Coulsen.

Being a bad ass wasn't their entire characters, but they were all suitably competant when appropriate, yet did not bore me to tears the rest of the time.

"People will not assume that what they read on the internet is trustworthy or that it carries any particular ­assurance or accuracy" - Lord Leveson
"Hyperbole is a cancer" - Lakov Sanite
jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1027 on: April 16, 2014, 08:32:54 AM

Outside of the unlikely possibility that they've brainwashed Ward into thinking he is Hydra,  I was wrong about him.  In retrospect, after seeing some clips put together from throughout the season that show individual Ward moments that had subtle double meanings, I'm now thinking it was planned all along and executed well.  

The main lingering issue for me is Hand telling Ward to shoot Garrett in the plane.  It makes no sense.  Risk piercing the hull to kill a prisoner which is the sole reason you're in the air in the first place?  I still would not be surprised if there were more there... however, I can't come up with a good storyline that isn't riddled with logic holes.
I thought for just a second that we were going to get to see Blonsky (Abomination) when Ward curt through the floor in the Fridge, but then I recalled that the Fridge was on a beach somewhere and Blonksy was in Cryo in Alaska - not the Fridge.  
« Last Edit: April 16, 2014, 09:44:13 AM by jgsugden »

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
Evildrider
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5521


Reply #1028 on: April 16, 2014, 12:04:02 PM

Telling Ward to kill Garret is totally within Hand's character from how I remember her in the comics.
MahrinSkel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10859

When she crossed over, she was just a ship. But when she came back... she was bullshit!


Reply #1029 on: April 16, 2014, 12:17:38 PM

Whedon does best with 'revealed/retired Badass', where a character that at first is played for laughs becomes a Badass.  He caan go the other way, generally with a Heel/Face Turn, where a Bad Guy Badass gets emasculated and kicked around for a while.  But he can't do straight-up Tough Guy without it feeling flat.

I think you guys were right and Ward really was evil all along.  But Garret is just a decoy for the real Clairvoyant, and Raina is probably the one that will reveal it.

--Dave

--Signature Unclear
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1030 on: April 16, 2014, 12:20:54 PM

Telling Ward to kill Garret is totally within Hand's character from how I remember her in the comics.


Except for the fact she let Sith Ward kill two agents before even moving a nanometer and then taking a bullet herself.  Not very shield-like reaction time there from her or her trained guards.   Ohhhhh, I see.
They all had to be LMDs.  No doubt.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2014, 07:12:59 PM by Ghambit »

"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
eldaec
Terracotta Army
Posts: 11844


Reply #1031 on: April 16, 2014, 12:24:46 PM

Whedon does best with 'revealed/retired Badass', where a character that at first is played for laughs becomes a Badass.  He caan go the other way, generally with a Heel/Face Turn, where a Bad Guy Badass gets emasculated and kicked around for a while.  But he can't do straight-up Tough Guy without it feeling flat.

I think you guys were right and Ward really was evil all along.  But Garret is just a decoy for the real Clairvoyant, and Raina is probably the one that will reveal it.

--Dave

Nobody can write straight up tough guy with no other personality traits. The problem with early Ward, or with Riley was that they had no character traits to write for.

"People will not assume that what they read on the internet is trustworthy or that it carries any particular ­assurance or accuracy" - Lord Leveson
"Hyperbole is a cancer" - Lakov Sanite
jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1032 on: April 16, 2014, 01:32:37 PM

...Nobody can write straight up tough guy with no other personality traits. The problem with early Ward, or with Riley was that they had no character traits to write for.
There is a lot of character set up for Ward.  There is some stuff that was just the persona he put on, but there is also the whole thing with the well - which takes on a different meaning in retrospect.

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1033 on: April 16, 2014, 07:16:48 PM

Maybe Garrett is one of Ward's brothers; maybe the older abusive one (and what Ward actually owes Garrett is vengeful).  I thought initially Garrett would be the younger one that got thrown down a well, but he's too old for that.

"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1034 on: April 17, 2014, 07:29:51 AM

They reveal that Ward was the one at the top of the well at the end of that episode. It is still interesting to me that he reflected on that moment.

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #1035 on: April 17, 2014, 08:14:17 AM

I actually thought the actor playing Ward really showed some acting chops in this episode. In the conversation with Raina and Skye, the way he shifts from Sith Ward to boring early show Ward was a nice flick of the switch type of acting change. I like him more now.

Skye still sucks.

Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1036 on: April 17, 2014, 09:02:46 AM

They reveal that Ward was the one at the top of the well at the end of that episode. It is still interesting to me that he reflected on that moment.

There were two brothers.  One threw the little one down the well whilst Ward stood and watched, no?  I bet Garrett is one of em.

"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1037 on: April 17, 2014, 12:35:45 PM

They reveal that Ward was the one at the top of the well at the end of that episode. It is still interesting to me that he reflected on that moment.

There were two brothers.  One threw the little one down the well whilst Ward stood and watched, no?  I bet Garrett is one of em.
Brain fart on my end - I thoiught you were saying Wardf was in the well, not Garrett.  My bad.

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
Threash
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9171


Reply #1038 on: April 23, 2014, 06:24:58 AM

So Skye's name is Mary Sue, that's fucking hilarious.

I am the .00000001428%
Ironwood
Terracotta Army
Posts: 28240


Reply #1039 on: April 23, 2014, 07:30:45 AM

Seriously ?

"Mr Soft Owl has Seen Some Shit." - Sun Tzu
RhyssaFireheart
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3525


WWW
Reply #1040 on: April 23, 2014, 07:43:40 AM

Well, that's supposedly the name she was given at the orphanage, she said.  I heard her say it but didn't make the connection until Threash posted in there.  That's too laughable.

And I'm rather enjoying evil!Grant, he's much more "likeable" as a bad guy.  I wonder how Skye left a message for the rest of the team, now that she's figured out Grant is HYDRA.

Also, a friend posted this the other day in her FB feed -


Threash
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9171


Reply #1041 on: April 23, 2014, 08:54:08 AM

  I wonder how Skye left a message for the rest of the team, now that she's figured out Grant is HYDRA.


Quote

That's fucking awesome.

I am the .00000001428%
Raguel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1419


Reply #1042 on: April 23, 2014, 10:10:57 PM

And I'm rather enjoying evil!Grant, he's much more "likeable" as a bad guy. 
EvilGrant is best Grant.

This show is finally becoming the one I wanted from the beginning.  I'm even starting to like Skye.
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #1043 on: April 23, 2014, 10:22:20 PM

We're seeing more of those obscure, C-List super powered folks some people have been wanting to see from the beginning.  Even that off-hand comment in the previous episode about Johnny Horton turns out to be referring to an actual character.

Over and out.
Raguel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1419


Reply #1044 on: April 23, 2014, 11:04:12 PM

I never really got that demand. What I wanted was SHIELD, and to me that means fighting groups like HYDRA and AIM.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #1045 on: April 24, 2014, 09:16:31 AM

We're seeing more of those obscure, C-List super powered folks some people have been wanting to see from the beginning.  Even that off-hand comment in the previous episode about Johnny Horton turns out to be referring to an actual character.

I thought I noticed something about the guy with the lion's head as the Griffin.

And yes, Evil Grant is definitely a lot more interesting. Skye still bothers the shit out of me, but the Mary Sue nickname was a good little bit of self-deprecating humor by the writers. They are getting better. Also glad to see them bring in an actual Marvel super-villain (the darkforce guy in this one is actually Blackout from the comics) even if he didn't have a costume. I want more costumes.

jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1046 on: April 24, 2014, 09:44:23 AM

For those that do not get the reference: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MarySue

I think costumes are on the way in the next 18 months.  Cap II ends S.H.I.E.L.D. as the protector of the people - leaving the job in the hands of vigilantes and heroes.  Before that truly takes shape, I think that the next season of S.H.I.E.L.D. will show the world falling into chaos.  I think Avengers II will end with the Avengers being an authorized peace keeping force, filling the void.  People will start using (less flamboyant) costumes to hide their identies and become vigilantes to assist, which would roll into the Netflix shows.

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
RhyssaFireheart
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3525


WWW
Reply #1047 on: April 24, 2014, 09:47:21 AM

I'm fine with no costumes though.  I mean, think about it, the idea of costumes is more than a bit silly, especially if you're thinking of them in the comics way, because who the hell is going to run around wearing spandex in public?  That's why I like uniforms instead, similar to how they've been done in the X-Men movies.  You don't think twice about a police officer or a deliveryman in their uniform.  It's something that you notice but tend to disregard because it's "normal" to you.  And a lot of the official costumes that heroes and villains have tend to make you wonder what drugs the artist was doing at the time.

RhyssaFireheart
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3525


WWW
Reply #1048 on: April 24, 2014, 09:48:53 AM

For those that do not get the reference: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MarySue

I think costumes are on the way in the next 18 months.  Cap II ends S.H.I.E.L.D. as the protector of the people - leaving the job in the hands of vigilantes and heroes.  Before that truly takes shape, I think that the next season of S.H.I.E.L.D. will show the world falling into chaos.  I think Avengers II will end with the Avengers being an authorized peace keeping force, filling the void.  People will start using (less flamboyant) costumes to hide their identies and become vigilantes to assist, which would roll into the Netflix shows.
Don't TVTropes links require and automatic warning?  Even if they're open links? ;)

My reply was to Haemish but it works for this post too. 

jgsugden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3888


Reply #1049 on: April 24, 2014, 09:53:32 AM

...  And a lot of the official costumes that heroes and villains have tend to make you wonder what drugs the artist was doing at the time.
Considering the percentage of characters designed in the 70s, the answer is usually LSD/pot mix.

2020 will be the year I gave up all hope.
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 46 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  TV  |  Topic: Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC