Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 04:24:37 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Topic: New Google Browser 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] Go Down Print
Author Topic: New Google Browser  (Read 69819 times)
Teleku
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10516

https://i.imgur.com/mcj5kz7.png


Reply #245 on: December 09, 2009, 01:12:27 PM

Is there any difference between Chrome and Chromium for performance?  Or is the only difference one doesn't have the auto-updater?

"My great-grandfather did not travel across four thousand miles of the Atlantic Ocean to see this nation overrun by immigrants.  He did it because he killed a man back in Ireland. That's the rumor."
-Stephen Colbert
tazelbain
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6603

tazelbain


Reply #246 on: December 09, 2009, 01:22:07 PM

Hopeful now that extensions have been released,  Adblock is close to follow then I can use Chrome.

"Me am play gods"
caladein
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3174


WWW
Reply #247 on: December 09, 2009, 01:45:15 PM

Hopeful now that extensions have been released,  Adblock is close to follow then I can use Chrome.

There are a couple of extensions that use EasyList for filtering ads out already.

"Point being, they can't make everyone happy, so I hope they pick me." -Ingmar
"OH MY GOD WE'RE SURROUNDED SEND FOR BACKUP DIG IN DEFENSIVE POSITIONS MAN YOUR NECKBEARDS" -tgr
naum
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4263


WWW
Reply #248 on: December 09, 2009, 05:11:39 PM

Is there any difference between Chrome and Chromium for performance?  Or is the only difference one doesn't have the auto-updater?

AFAIK, the only difference is the auto-updater and the Google branding.

"Should the batman kill Joker because it would save more lives?" is a fundamentally different question from "should the batman have a bunch of machineguns that go BATBATBATBATBAT because its totally cool?". ~Goumindong
Engels
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9029

inflicts shingles.


Reply #249 on: December 10, 2009, 09:19:00 AM

Well, I still can't really use Chrome comfortably for two related reasons:

A) it doesn't remember zoom settings. Its important to me because at home I use a 26 inch monitor at high resolution and I like to sit a bit back from the behemoth. Since changing font size doesn't fix everything on any given website, I like to have the browser zoomed at 125% or so. Chrome doesn't keep this as a sticky setting, while IE and Firefox do.

B) If you do zoom in, some flash player functionality is lost. The dailyshow flashplayer, for example, can't be 'controlled' if you have the page at anything other than normal zoom. This isn't an issue with IE or Firefox either.


I should get back to nature, too.  You know, like going to a shop for groceries instead of the computer.  Maybe a condo in the woods that doesn't even have a health club or restaurant attached.  Buy a car with only two cup holders or something. -Signe

I LIKE being bounced around by Tonkors. - Lantyssa

Babies shooting themselves in the head is the state bird of West Virginia. - schild
Teleku
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10516

https://i.imgur.com/mcj5kz7.png


Reply #250 on: December 10, 2009, 09:27:13 AM

Is there any difference between Chrome and Chromium for performance?  Or is the only difference one doesn't have the auto-updater?

AFAIK, the only difference is the auto-updater and the Google branding.
Ah, ok then.  I like my auto-updates, so sticking with Chrome.

"My great-grandfather did not travel across four thousand miles of the Atlantic Ocean to see this nation overrun by immigrants.  He did it because he killed a man back in Ireland. That's the rumor."
-Stephen Colbert
fuser
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1572


Reply #251 on: December 10, 2009, 09:39:21 AM

Every time I end up switching back to firefox from chrome/chromium because of some key addons like others have highlighted (noscript, modify headers, foxyproxy, syncplaces, igoogle tab remover).

Seriously the tab is annoying and no way to remove it via options, only extensions or greasemonkey scripts. Here's an example of it:
[/s]

Wow there is a tab remover already here.

With the move of extensions now in the stable builds hopefully most of the firefox extensions will be developed because its really nice.

« Last Edit: December 10, 2009, 09:57:35 AM by fuser »
Fabricated
Moderator
Posts: 8978

~Living the Dream~


WWW
Reply #252 on: December 10, 2009, 12:01:38 PM

What's weird and kinda depressing is that one of the authors for an adblocker is claiming that anybody claiming to release a "real ad blocker" is full of shit since the way extensions work, you can't just block ads. I guess all they can do is not display them, but they still load I guess?

"The world is populated in the main by people who should not exist." - George Bernard Shaw
fuser
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1572


Reply #253 on: December 10, 2009, 12:33:07 PM

What's weird and kinda depressing is that one of the authors for an adblocker is claiming that anybody claiming to release a "real ad blocker" is full of shit since the way extensions work, you can't just block ads. I guess all they can do is not display them, but they still load I guess?

Yeah its all post render modifications, same for the igoogle tab blocker. It renders for a second then kills the div tag.
Fabricated
Moderator
Posts: 8978

~Living the Dream~


WWW
Reply #254 on: December 10, 2009, 02:08:14 PM

That's basically the end of Chrome possibly becoming my default browser then. No real AdBlock plugin means Firefox forever I guess.

"The world is populated in the main by people who should not exist." - George Bernard Shaw
tazelbain
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6603

tazelbain


Reply #255 on: December 10, 2009, 02:34:18 PM

I remember hearing that threaded tabs will be in Firefox 4, but I can't find confirmation.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2009, 02:43:53 PM by tazelbain »

"Me am play gods"
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #256 on: December 10, 2009, 02:42:47 PM

That's basically the end of Chrome possibly becoming my default browser then. No real AdBlock plugin means Firefox forever I guess.
You could install a proxy to strip out the ads.
BitWarrior
Terracotta Army
Posts: 336


WWW
Reply #257 on: December 10, 2009, 03:56:14 PM

That's basically the end of Chrome possibly becoming my default browser then. No real AdBlock plugin means Firefox forever I guess.

Use a hosts file.

http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.
fuser
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1572


Reply #258 on: December 10, 2009, 05:18:05 PM

Well that kinda seals the fate for now

Eight months later, Chrome extensions are here but NoScript is not among them yet, and people are asking why. The reason is very simple: Chrome is still lacking the required infrastructure for selective script disablement and object blocking.

Maybe Google plans to implement the missing stuff later, maybe they’re still trying to figure out whether it can be done without enabling effective ad blocking, but in the meanwhile the pale AdBlock and FlashBlock imitations which have been hacked together by overwhelming popular demand, are forced to use a very fragile CSS-based hiding approach, ridiculously easy to circumvent.
caladein
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3174


WWW
Reply #259 on: February 01, 2010, 05:02:39 PM

For any Greasemonkey users out there: Chrome now natively supports Greasemonkey scripts.

About 15-25% of them don't work on Chrome right now, but the couple I remember from my primary-FF days work well.

"Point being, they can't make everyone happy, so I hope they pick me." -Ingmar
"OH MY GOD WE'RE SURROUNDED SEND FOR BACKUP DIG IN DEFENSIVE POSITIONS MAN YOUR NECKBEARDS" -tgr
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Topic: New Google Browser  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC