Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 06:35:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  Gaming  |  Topic: New Computer Build, advice requested 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Down Print
Author Topic: New Computer Build, advice requested  (Read 36597 times)
Stewie
Terracotta Army
Posts: 439


Reply #105 on: November 06, 2009, 10:46:47 AM

Wow, that price is awesome. How long ago did you get that? My memory cost me $124 cdn
If I went with the i7 and tri channel memory generic ocz memory would have cost around $180 for the 6gb

here is the memory I got

Professional Forum Lurker.
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #106 on: November 06, 2009, 11:13:30 AM

Wow, that price is awesome. How long ago did you get that?
I paid $47 ($67-$20 MIR) for 4 GB in March.

My RAM is ddr2 800, but I use crucial memory.
AutomaticZen
Terracotta Army
Posts: 768


Reply #107 on: November 06, 2009, 02:59:39 PM

Wow, that price is awesome. How long ago did you get that? My memory cost me $124 cdn
If I went with the i7 and tri channel memory generic ocz memory would have cost around $180 for the 6gb

here is the memory I got

I went with the same brand, but the 1333 set, per the link I posted before saying that premium memory isn't quite worth it over latency.
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #108 on: November 08, 2009, 02:58:33 AM

(Oblivion is the one that comes to mind).

705 Kbps, 44 kHz sample, mono channel PCM.

And people wonder why their computer fucking explodes when a horse gallops by.
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #109 on: November 08, 2009, 08:15:29 AM

You actually think writing ~88KB over an entire second to a sound card buffer should have any noticeable effect on a modern computer?

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #110 on: November 08, 2009, 11:08:20 AM


I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation why disabling footfalls yields a 16 fps increase when fighting wolves and rats that doesn't involve me being right.

EDIT: This also happens to be the reason I always recommend a real sound card.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2009, 11:10:05 AM by Sheepherder »
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #111 on: November 08, 2009, 11:21:58 AM


I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation why disabling footfalls yields a 16 fps increase when fighting wolves and rats that doesn't involve me being right.

EDIT: This also happens to be the reason I always recommend a real sound card.

No, there is an issue with how they handle sound files (possibly - bugs are hardly ever that straight forward) the size of the file you mentioned though, or it's sampling rate or any other detail about it, really has nothing to do with it.

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Tarami
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1980


Reply #112 on: November 08, 2009, 11:39:46 AM

On the topic of sound cards and computer building, I feel I want to promote this card a bit, if you're fine with stereo sound:

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Audiophile2496.html

Hands down the cleanest, highest quality stereo sound you can get for under $150, hell, under $300 for that matter. I absolutely love mine and will never buy another bloated, shitty Creative card.

- I'm giving you this one for free.
- Nothing's free in the waterworld.
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #113 on: November 08, 2009, 12:53:50 PM

No, there is an issue with how they handle sound files (possibly - bugs are hardly ever that straight forward) the size of the file you mentioned though, or it's sampling rate or any other detail about it, really has nothing to do with it.

So, effectively your argument is that one variable in a compound problem is more important than the others by dint of my being wrong, predicated on that assumption.  For future reference: it's trivially easy to downsample audio with a batch converter, whereas patching a game engine is not.
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #114 on: November 08, 2009, 01:53:50 PM

So, effectively your argument is that one variable in a compound problem is more important than the others by dint of my being wrong, predicated on that assumption.  For future reference: it's trivially easy to downsample audio with a batch converter, whereas patching a game engine is not.

No my argument is the things you quoted didn't have the effect you say they did.  My evidence is that of the millions and millions of people who played Oblivion very, very few ran into a problem with audio playback causing frame rate drop (Which everyone would have had if that had actually been the issue).  This is also supported by the fact that I know a modern computer bus can handle several orders of magnitude more data transfer than 705kbps across the Northbridge to the Southbridge and out to an Audio Device regardless of if that audio device is located on the motherboard or on a separate daughter card.

I'm glad that you know how to resample audio through a batch file, I am sure it will make your life much more wonderful.

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Engels
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9029

inflicts shingles.


Reply #115 on: November 08, 2009, 03:19:49 PM

On the topic of sound cards and computer building, I feel I want to promote this card a bit, if you're fine with stereo sound:

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Audiophile2496.html

Hands down the cleanest, highest quality stereo sound you can get for under $150, hell, under $300 for that matter. I absolutely love mine and will never buy another bloated, shitty Creative card.

So to get to your speakers, do you have this going through a mixer or a tuner or directly to speakers that can take that type of connection?

I should get back to nature, too.  You know, like going to a shop for groceries instead of the computer.  Maybe a condo in the woods that doesn't even have a health club or restaurant attached.  Buy a car with only two cup holders or something. -Signe

I LIKE being bounced around by Tonkors. - Lantyssa

Babies shooting themselves in the head is the state bird of West Virginia. - schild
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657


Reply #116 on: November 08, 2009, 03:33:48 PM

If you mean computer speakers this is what you want:

http://www.amazon.com/3-5mm-Mini-Plug-Computer-Stereo/dp/B000FEHO0U
Engels
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9029

inflicts shingles.


Reply #117 on: November 08, 2009, 03:40:39 PM

Thanks Trippy. That was pretty much my question. I'm also wondering if using ye-olde 'comes with a Dell' computer speakers would pretty much waste that sound card's potential. I can tell the difference between on-board sound and my creative PCI card even on my cheapo harman/kardon speaker set, but I wonder if I would really note an improvement with a more sophisticated sound card like the one above.

I should get back to nature, too.  You know, like going to a shop for groceries instead of the computer.  Maybe a condo in the woods that doesn't even have a health club or restaurant attached.  Buy a car with only two cup holders or something. -Signe

I LIKE being bounced around by Tonkors. - Lantyssa

Babies shooting themselves in the head is the state bird of West Virginia. - schild
Tarami
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1980


Reply #118 on: November 08, 2009, 04:01:37 PM

It could be considered a waste if you're already relatively happy with your current soundcard, but it's worth considering if you're planning an upgrade, as it's not more expensive than your typical Creative card. To be realistic, no, I don't think there'll be a considerable difference to your current card, especially as Creative's cards are usually quite biased to fit well with systems lacking midrange (such as satellites + subwoofer.) However, if you're the kind of person who has headphones worth more than $150 or using the home audio system from the computer, I would recommend looking into it, because it gives a much more "honest" sound than most gaming soundcards do.

- I'm giving you this one for free.
- Nothing's free in the waterworld.
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #119 on: November 08, 2009, 04:37:36 PM

Murgos:

Yes, I alone found and corrected this.

Will that suffice?  Or should I hit up the modding and community sites too?  Will you also need a search for Realtek audio?

Bethesda's sound engine is bad.  The sound files are all excessively high quality.  And onboard audio unloads large quantities of floating-point math on your processor proportional to the size and number of sound effects.  Point one and two should not have ever occurred, because point three is inevitable in consumer computers.  Sky's problem with the Auzentech is probably Codec or driver related, which doesn't surprise me coming from a game that can be interfered with by an HP printer.  I was more pointing out that Oblivion is a reasonable benchmark like this is an argument that a pair of sane individuals would have.  Don't make me throw a cat at you.
Engels
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9029

inflicts shingles.


Reply #120 on: November 08, 2009, 05:08:21 PM

stuff

Thanks Tarami. That describes my situation well. Maybe once I upgrade my system entirely I will reconsider what card to buy.

I should get back to nature, too.  You know, like going to a shop for groceries instead of the computer.  Maybe a condo in the woods that doesn't even have a health club or restaurant attached.  Buy a car with only two cup holders or something. -Signe

I LIKE being bounced around by Tonkors. - Lantyssa

Babies shooting themselves in the head is the state bird of West Virginia. - schild
Hoax
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8110

l33t kiddie


Reply #121 on: November 08, 2009, 07:20:13 PM

On the topic of sound cards and computer building, I feel I want to promote this card a bit, if you're fine with stereo sound:

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Audiophile2496.html

Hands down the cleanest, highest quality stereo sound you can get for under $150, hell, under $300 for that matter. I absolutely love mine and will never buy another bloated, shitty Creative card.

I own one of these, mostly because I hate Creative's shitty shit cards with a passion.  I haven't had the money to actually get some speakers to use it yet but I plan to, possibly xmas (sigh).

A nation consists of its laws. A nation does not consist of its situation at a given time. If an individual's morals are situational, then that individual is without morals. If a nation's laws are situational, that nation has no laws, and soon isn't a nation.
-William Gibson
Kageh
Terracotta Army
Posts: 359


Reply #122 on: November 09, 2009, 04:02:36 AM

I own one of these, mostly because I hate Creative's shitty shit cards with a passion.  I haven't had the money to actually get some speakers to use it yet but I plan to, possibly xmas (sigh).

I think the hardware is quite okay. Sadly, the drivers and policies concerning them are a totally different story  ACK!
Mosesandstick
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2476


Reply #123 on: November 09, 2009, 04:48:13 AM

Fark. I've got problems.

I can get the computer to boot. For half a second. When I only have the mobo, PSU and one stick of ram connected. And then it'll refuse to start again unless I start taking stuff out and putting it back in.

Ok, managed to get the CPU to boot permanently. Connected the GPU. Turns off after half a second again. I have to connect the 24 pin connector and reconnect it everytime to get it to re-boot.

I'm leaning towards it being a wonky PSU (and the first time I've bought a branded PSU... heh). Any advice?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2009, 05:17:41 AM by Mosesandstick »
Kageh
Terracotta Army
Posts: 359


Reply #124 on: November 09, 2009, 05:27:02 AM

Not sure, doesn't sound like the usual PSU troubles I know.

If you clear CMOS after a failed boot, does that help like disconnecting the 24-pin connector?
Mosesandstick
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2476


Reply #125 on: November 09, 2009, 05:47:09 AM

That did something. I think I might be able to get it work.  Thanks.

I tried the magic method of taking everything out, reconnecting everything and putting it back in. Seems to be working so far.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2009, 07:28:31 AM by Mosesandstick »
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #126 on: November 09, 2009, 07:30:19 AM

Murgos:

Yes, I alone found and corrected this.

Will that suffice?  Or should I hit up the modding and community sites too?  Will you also need a search for Realtek audio?

Bethesda's sound engine is bad.  The sound files are all excessively high quality.  And onboard audio unloads large quantities of floating-point math on your processor proportional to the size and number of sound effects.  Point one and two should not have ever occurred, because point three is inevitable in consumer computers.  Sky's problem with the Auzentech is probably Codec or driver related, which doesn't surprise me coming from a game that can be interfered with by an HP printer.  I was more pointing out that Oblivion is a reasonable benchmark like this is an argument that a pair of sane individuals would have.  Don't make me throw a cat at you.

Point 1, is the point I made.  If point 1 didn't happen points 2 and 3 are inconsequential.

I played Oblivion with Real-Tek onboard sound without the issues linked, I've only ever used on-baord sound since it became standard.  Again, because a few people had problems that could be partially addressed with lower quality sound/turning off sound effects doesn't mean that the sound files were the actual problem.  Chances are their problems were actually tied to some other third party software installed in their system at the time.

16 bit, 44kHz samples are not the issue.

Edit:  To be absolutely clear.  The AC'97 specification from Intel requires that parts can move 12 channels @ 960 kbps of raw PCM data.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2009, 07:42:27 AM by Murgos »

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Mosesandstick
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2476


Reply #127 on: November 09, 2009, 08:25:37 AM

Ok I'm pretty sure that my something between my mobo and PSU is shorting - I have really no clue what though. Any advice?
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #128 on: November 09, 2009, 08:28:42 AM

Ok I'm pretty sure that my something between my mobo and PSU is shorting - I have really no clue what though. Any advice?

Check out the comments on THIS THREAD.

Some good advice there.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Kageh
Terracotta Army
Posts: 359


Reply #129 on: November 09, 2009, 09:41:03 AM

Ok I'm pretty sure that my something between my mobo and PSU is shorting - I have really no clue what though. Any advice?

If you leave the rather obvious stuff aside (screws/solder pins making contact with the motherboard or the metal tray or something like this, where the manufacturing has to have really fucked up), it should be one of the components you have connected. CPU pins, a ram bank, the PCI-E connector, somewhere like that.

And my favorite, which, I kid you not, happened to me on my $300 i7 board: The CMOS battery was put in the wrong way. By ASUS. From the manufacturer. I accidentally noticed that in a googled picture, or otherwise I would have despaired.
Mosesandstick
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2476


Reply #130 on: November 09, 2009, 12:45:05 PM

I *think* it was one of the screws mounting the mobo to the case. Not kidding. There's a pretty good chance it was something else, but now that it's finally working I'm not going to try and replicate it. I'm sure it'll crop up the next time I accidently kick the computer.
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #131 on: November 09, 2009, 12:51:57 PM

I *think* it was one of the screws mounting the mobo to the case. Not kidding. There's a pretty good chance it was something else, but now that it's finally working I'm not going to try and replicate it. I'm sure it'll crop up the next time I accidently kick the computer.

This is actually pretty common.  If one shifts a little bit it can cause a short to ground (the case is ground, so the edge of a screw that touches a lead and touches the case bridges the gap) for which, if you are lucky, the system will just refuse to start up.  If you're unlucky the magic blue smoke gets out.

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Hoax
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8110

l33t kiddie


Reply #132 on: November 09, 2009, 12:58:34 PM

I had that happen once, fully my fault I had a spacer in the wrong place.  Thank god it wasn't a cheapo mobo that would have shit itself and caught fire but that is a mistake I will not ever let happen again.

A nation consists of its laws. A nation does not consist of its situation at a given time. If an individual's morals are situational, then that individual is without morals. If a nation's laws are situational, that nation has no laws, and soon isn't a nation.
-William Gibson
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #133 on: November 10, 2009, 02:41:29 AM

Chances are their problems were actually tied to some other third party software installed in their system at the time.

16 bit, 44kHz samples are not the issue.

Edit:  To be absolutely clear.  The AC'97 specification from Intel requires that parts can move 12 channels @ 960 kbps of raw PCM data.

Going from a Sigmatel AC'97 variant to an Audigy 2 cleared my problems completely with no other hardware or software changes except that which is entailed by such an upgrade.  Either the common vendors of onboard audio are putting out unusually shitty drivers even for audio devices, or something else is going on.  I'd imagine that something else is writing sound operations to the SIMD registers which also happen to be doing physics operations at the same moment, which neatly sidesteps your bandwidth objection, because it has nothing to do with bandwidth and everything to do with processing speed and intrinsically slow calculations.  But that's an uneducated guess.
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #134 on: November 10, 2009, 06:51:01 AM

If nvidia was still making boards with soundstorm, I'd still be using onboard sound. DD5.1 optical hardware on the board? Hell yeah.
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #135 on: November 10, 2009, 08:29:43 AM

Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #136 on: November 10, 2009, 09:16:12 AM

Am I missing the DD5.1 hardware? I was under the impression that onboard sound does DD5.1 through software codecs. The soundstorm had a licensed DD5.1 chip onboard to do real time hardware encoding, thanks to nvidia's deal with dolby for the xbox.

And auzentech was the only other provider I know of that did hardware DD encoding and had an HDCP digital path.
Sheepherder
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5192


Reply #137 on: November 10, 2009, 06:14:02 PM

Am I missing the DD5.1 hardware? I was under the impression that onboard sound does DD5.1 through software codecs. The soundstorm had a licensed DD5.1 chip onboard to do real time hardware encoding, thanks to nvidia's deal with dolby for the xbox.

Okay, assuming both I and you know what we are saying, that's *significantly* different.  Almost to the point of not being a real onboard sound device at all.
Tebonas
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6365


Reply #138 on: November 13, 2009, 08:48:39 AM

Fuckers!

I got my whole rig ready to be set up, and there are no Radeon 5850 available for at least 3 weeks, average wait time 1 to 3 months.

WTF? Do these cards cure cancer???
Cyrrex
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10603


Reply #139 on: November 13, 2009, 11:17:40 AM

Fuckers!

I got my whole rig ready to be set up, and there are no Radeon 5850 available for at least 3 weeks, average wait time 1 to 3 months.

WTF? Do these cards cure cancer???

No, but they are so powerful that they may be causing cancer.  They need FDA approval.

"...maybe if you cleaned the piss out of the sunny d bottles under your desks and returned em, you could upgrade you vid cards, fucken lusers.." - Grunk
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  Gaming  |  Topic: New Computer Build, advice requested  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC