Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 04:47:05 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Movies  |  Topic: Star Trek 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 22 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Star Trek  (Read 206431 times)
Riggswolfe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8046


Reply #210 on: January 05, 2009, 02:03:25 PM

In any case, you're obviously one of those guys that hasn't liked Trek in a good twenty years.  You  just don't like it anymore. It's ok. Tastes change.

*takes a deep breath* I'm by no means a Trekkie or Trekker or whatever the term is but I like Trek. I didn't like shows past TNG because they were sterile, poorly written pieces of crap that are being produced solely to cash in on the fans. Star Trek became horrible and needed to be stopped before it was past saving. This new movie looks interesting and I have some hopes for it but we'll see what happens.

"We live in a country, where John Lennon takes six bullets in the chest, Yoko Ono was standing right next to him and not one fucking bullet! Explain that to me! Explain that to me, God! Explain it to me, God!" - Denis Leary summing up my feelings about the nature of the universe.
Reg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5281


Reply #211 on: January 05, 2009, 02:11:45 PM

Who knows? I guess it's remotely possible that you will suddenly start to enjoy it again for the first time in decades.

Perhaps the new Trek movie will have a spunky 13 year old who saves the ship over and over and over until blood shoots out of your ears. 'Cause really. That's what Star Trek is all about.
Tebonas
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6365


Reply #212 on: January 05, 2009, 04:26:59 PM

You sure you watched DS9? Usually the attacks against DS9 are the exact opposite of what you say. That its too gritty for a Trek, and that its long story arches run counter to the standard episode of the week concept.
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #213 on: January 05, 2009, 04:46:40 PM

It had it's share of "grit", but it also had a lot of humor to it. Obvious humor and subtle. That's always the first thing that comes to mind when I think of it. Some people recommended BSG to me because it focused on "grit", but that isn't why I even watched DS9. Those two shows weren't going for the same thing at all (it's nothing like "Babylon 5" to me either, another show people recommend. I mean, if BSG and Babylon 5 is someone's idea of a better DS9, then they weren't watching DS9. They might be better by some standard, but they're entirely different).
Evildrider
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5521


Reply #214 on: January 05, 2009, 05:03:11 PM

Babylon 5 sucked ass. 

stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #215 on: January 05, 2009, 05:04:57 PM

I've only seen a few episodes of it.. Same with BSG. Couldn't get into either one.

But.. I understand that's how some people feel about DS9 as well (I'll be the first to admit that it didn't get off to a good start too --- but neither did any other Trek.).
« Last Edit: January 05, 2009, 05:06:38 PM by Stray »
ahoythematey
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1729


Reply #216 on: January 05, 2009, 05:37:06 PM

Just rewatched Wrath of Khan.  It's still awesome.  If Abrams is smart he'll have looked to a lot of that films more subtle touches as inspiration.
Jain Zar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1362


Reply #217 on: January 05, 2009, 07:27:31 PM

I hope the new flick is good.  Itll give me impetus to run the old FASA Star Trek RPG I just got.  Ship counters only half punched out.  Great price and outside of the box wear and tear (its a 20+ year old copy!) its practically in perfect condition!  DRILLING AND MANLINESS
Abagadro
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12227

Possibly the only user with more posts in the Den than PC/Console Gaming.


Reply #218 on: January 05, 2009, 07:47:22 PM

Quote
Some people recommended BSG to me because it focused on "grit", but that isn't why I even watched DS9. Those two shows weren't going for the same thing at all

I actually think they are remarkably similar. Not surprising considering they were made by the same guy.

I'm one of those (and there are many) who think Trek improved mightily after Roddenberry had nothing to do with it. The entire first season and a half of TNG was absolutely terrible except for maybe 2 episodes. Only when Gene stepped aside did things really get going well IMO.

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

-H.L. Mencken
FatuousTwat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2223


Reply #219 on: January 05, 2009, 08:10:54 PM

I'm one of those (and there are many) who think Trek improved mightily after Roddenberry had nothing to do with it. The entire first season and a half of TNG was absolutely terrible except for maybe 2 episodes. Only when Gene stepped aside did things really get going well IMO.

QFT. I've heard that Patrick Stewart kept his bags packed for the first 3 or so seasons. He expected it to fail any day.

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #220 on: January 05, 2009, 09:29:14 PM

Quote
Some people recommended BSG to me because it focused on "grit", but that isn't why I even watched DS9. Those two shows weren't going for the same thing at all

I actually think they are remarkably similar. Not surprising considering they were made by the same guy.

Yeah, and I gravitated towards it when some told me that he was involved. I just couldn't get into it though. This may sound cheesy, but it could have been because it was a post 9/11 type of deal -- I mean, it seemed a lot more bleak and in touch with themes of war and crisis. I didn't stick around long, but I didn't notice much potential for humor either. On the flipside, even when DS9 got fully settled into it's Dominion story arc, characters like Weyoun (who was always getting killed by his shapeshifter superiors and cloned) were funny. And BSG Cylons are nowhere near as funny in their deception as Cardassians. I can't emphasize enough how funny Garak and Dukat become as the show progresses. Garak's the best Star Trek side character ever, and Dukat the best villain ever.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2009, 09:31:53 PM by Stray »
Riggswolfe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8046


Reply #221 on: January 06, 2009, 06:00:58 AM

You sure you watched DS9? Usually the attacks against DS9 are the exact opposite of what you say. That its too gritty for a Trek, and that its long story arches run counter to the standard episode of the week concept.

To be fair, I was generalizing. My problem with DS9 was that the characters didn't click with me, especially the Captain. How that particular actor managed to play a Captain that I not only didn't like but that actively pissed me off I don't know. So, yeah, with DS9 it was more about the characters than the writing. I liked a couple of them, Quark and Bashir mostly. I liked umm...spotfacegirl kinda, but that's mostly because she was hot. Her character was kind of boring in the first season. I hear she improved later but they'd already lost me by then.

"We live in a country, where John Lennon takes six bullets in the chest, Yoko Ono was standing right next to him and not one fucking bullet! Explain that to me! Explain that to me, God! Explain it to me, God!" - Denis Leary summing up my feelings about the nature of the universe.
Arthur_Parker
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5865

Internet Detective


Reply #222 on: January 06, 2009, 06:23:26 AM

The first DS9 episode had Sisko hating Picard, I thought the forced hate was such a lazy and obvious way to introduce an important new character.  I liked the original series, the casting in the later ones was either excellent or terrible, also too many kids.
Slyfeind
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2037


Reply #223 on: January 06, 2009, 10:55:28 AM

Some people recommended BSG to me because it focused on "grit", but that isn't why I even watched DS9. Those two shows weren't going for the same thing at all

I actually think they are remarkably similar. Not surprising considering they were made by the same guy.

Oh dang. I didn't know Ronald Moore had a hand in DS9. I love everything I've seen of his except BSG. By all rights I should like that show, but it just never clicked with me.

Quote
I'm one of those (and there are many) who think Trek improved mightily after Roddenberry had nothing to do with it. The entire first season and a half of TNG was absolutely terrible except for maybe 2 episodes. Only when Gene stepped aside did things really get going well IMO.

Sad yet true.

Edit: quote blocks >_<

"Role playing in an MMO is more like an open orchestra with no conductor, anyone of any skill level can walk in at any time, and everyone brings their own instrument and plays whatever song they want.  Then toss PvP into the mix and things REALLY get ugly!" -Count Nerfedalot
Simond
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6742


Reply #224 on: January 06, 2009, 11:53:00 AM

Counterpoint to the "Voyager was good Star Trek" arguement: Threshold.

And seriously, people complaining about DS9/B5/BSG because they have story arcs? Really? You like reset buttons every week?

"You're really a good person, aren't you? So, there's no path for you to take here. Go home. This isn't a place for someone like you."
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #225 on: January 06, 2009, 12:24:58 PM

Babylon 5 sucked ass. 

You're dead to me.

stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #226 on: January 06, 2009, 02:17:45 PM

Counterpoint to the "Voyager was good Star Trek" arguement: Threshold.

And seriously, people complaining about DS9/B5/BSG because they have story arcs? Really? You like reset buttons every week?

Mind you, I never said it was good. Just that it had some good elements. So did Enterprise, but I'm not that much of a fan of either one.
FatuousTwat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2223


Reply #227 on: January 06, 2009, 06:31:47 PM

Counterpoint to the "Voyager was good Star Trek" arguement: Threshold.

And seriously, people complaining about DS9/B5/BSG because they have story arcs? Really? You like reset buttons every week?

I'm going to admit a horrible secret. I like Voyager. It was the first Trek I watched as a kid when it was first starting (DS9 was on too late), and I pretty much never missed an episode. It is probably my second fav series after TNG (which I also watched the hell out of when I was a kid).

I never really watched DS9, it has never really been on at a good time for me even to this day.

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #228 on: January 07, 2009, 03:13:45 PM

Babylon 5 sucked ass. 

You're dead to me.

I don't know that I've ever seen a show with such a completely huge gulf in acting quality between the best performances and the worst performances than B5. On the 'incredibly good' end you had Londo and G'Kar just completely dominating the screen every time they were on it, despite their extreme makeup and prosthetics and such, and on the 'incredibly awful' end you had Lyta, who had no sense of timing AT ALL - and the doctor was painful too.

I liked the show but it was definitely held back by some of the actors.

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449

Badge Whore


Reply #229 on: January 07, 2009, 03:21:31 PM

It helps that Andreas Katsulas (G'kar) was one of those fanatics as far as character actors go. The DVD set has a story that he'd get into makeup and WAS G'Kar until he took it off again, even at meal breaks or when having a cigarette.   Too bad he never got any really big roles.  His only other series with more than 2 appearances was TNG.

The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
Abagadro
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12227

Possibly the only user with more posts in the Den than PC/Console Gaming.


Reply #230 on: January 07, 2009, 10:29:06 PM

Quote
and on the 'incredibly awful' end you had Lyta, who had no sense of timing AT ALL

To be fair, Patricia Tallman is more of a stunt woman than an actress. The only reason she ended up in the series past the pilot was because Andrea Thompson bailed to go be on CNN.

I agree there was a huge gulf but mainly because Katsulas and Jurasik were so awesome (I'd also throw in Mummy, Furlan and Boxlietner in an elevated category, but not as elevated as those two).

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

-H.L. Mencken
Reg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5281


Reply #231 on: January 08, 2009, 03:21:56 AM

It always cracked me up seeing Billy Mumy in the credits. It gave me Lost in Space flashbacks.
Johny Cee
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3454


Reply #232 on: January 08, 2009, 05:27:34 AM

It always cracked me up seeing Billy Mumy in the credits. It gave me Lost in Space flashbacks.

I always wondered why he didn't send the bad guys to the corn field....
Venkman
Terracotta Army
Posts: 11536


Reply #233 on: January 10, 2009, 07:52:00 AM

Voyager had high points?  Really? 

Year of Hell, that episode where they're introduced to Slipstream tech (by that vengeful guy), and the one where the prototype Federation ship split into three parts were all pretty cool. Where they fell down was that they didn't carry through in almost any of these concepts because their contracts required full seasons on programmed cycles.

I didn't hate this show with the bile some have here. I didn't really hate DS9 either, I just got bored with it purportedly before it got good. And Enterprise was just a bunch of retconned crap I was glad to see them stop doing. I like the lore of Star Trek, but the entire IP needed the reboot we may get with the next movie. And if that doesn't succeed in breathing life back into it, ah well. More important things in this world are no longer with us either.
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #234 on: January 10, 2009, 08:10:47 AM

Enterprise had one standout story arc: Brent Spiner came in and played Data's grandfather -- the Soong before the Soong. Hell, I don't even remember all of the details, but umm.. He was a genetic engineer or some such. He created these super soldier kids -- the oldest of which was played by the guy who played Paul Atreides in the Sci Fi Dune movies. Anyways, they got out of control with the asskicking or somesuch. Again, I don't remember the details, but something about his genetic modifactions were tied into how the appearance of the Klingons changed as well (from the TOS look to the TNG ridged foreheads).. which is where it got pretty funny.


Also, General Shran was a funny character. Because the actor Jeffrey Combs (who played a Ferenghi in DS9, along with Weyoun from the Dominion, along with a host of other shit.. the best of which is the doctor from Re-Animator...) is basically the funniest actor to ever be in Trek.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2009, 08:21:48 AM by Stray »
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449

Badge Whore


Reply #235 on: January 10, 2009, 08:58:13 AM

It always cracked me up seeing Billy Mumy in the credits. It gave me Lost in Space flashbacks.

I always wondered why he didn't send the bad guys to the corn field....

That one's even more obscure, and even more awesome.

The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
Reg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5281


Reply #236 on: January 11, 2009, 04:55:41 PM

That Brent Spiner story arc was in the last season after they'd replaced the writers who gave us the mutant vampire time travelling space nazis.  The last season really wasn't bad. I was sorry they didn't get that writing team earlier. They might have saved the show.
Ironwood
Terracotta Army
Posts: 28240


Reply #237 on: January 12, 2009, 12:21:29 AM

You're dreaming.

Pretty much all the way through the thread.

"Mr Soft Owl has Seen Some Shit." - Sun Tzu
Reg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5281


Reply #238 on: January 12, 2009, 02:25:05 AM

Yeah, yea, I know. It's all shit and the writers are cunts. Trek has been dead since the Wrath of Khan.
DraconianOne
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2905


Reply #239 on: January 12, 2009, 05:47:23 AM

Also, General Shran was a funny character. Because the actor Jeffrey Combs (who played a Ferenghi in DS9, along with Weyoun from the Dominion, along with a host of other shit.. the best of which is the doctor from Re-Animator...) is basically the funniest actor to ever be in Trek.

Also had a one episode role in Voyager and Babylon 5 too.  Soon to be appearing as Wilbur Whateley in a new version of the Dunwich Horror from the director that brought you "Transmorphers", "Flu Bird Horror" and "Hillside Cannibals".


A point can be MOOT. MUTE is more along the lines of what you should be. - WayAbvPar
Draegan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10043


Reply #240 on: January 12, 2009, 12:51:49 PM

Last season of Enterprise was actually pretty cool if you ask me, the rest was crap.

I liked DS9 once the better story arcs were getting established.  I will always watch a TNG show, and Voyager was always shit.
palmer_eldritch
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1999


WWW
Reply #241 on: January 15, 2009, 10:38:01 AM

You sure you watched DS9? Usually the attacks against DS9 are the exact opposite of what you say. That its too gritty for a Trek, and that its long story arches run counter to the standard episode of the week concept.

You had to stick with it for a while to get to that though. The first couple of seasons had a very different feel to the later ones.
Ironwood
Terracotta Army
Posts: 28240


Reply #242 on: January 16, 2009, 06:54:32 AM

Last season of Enterprise was actually pretty cool if you ask me, the rest was crap.


Yeah, but this is the important bit.  It was dead already.  The last season was merely giving a transfusion to a corpse.

"Mr Soft Owl has Seen Some Shit." - Sun Tzu
Draegan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10043


Reply #243 on: January 21, 2009, 01:54:21 PM

Once the put in a pretty good plot line and figured out how to create a storyline it got good.  They had to many retarded "lets explore random space" episodes that got rediculous.
UnSub
Contributor
Posts: 8064


WWW
Reply #244 on: January 21, 2009, 09:49:21 PM

It's probably already been said, but I would have preferred Star Trek to take on a new crew and ship for the movie, not rehash TOS.

Also, I don't get the excitement around this. The preview did nothing for me.

... I'll show myself out.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 22 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Movies  |  Topic: Star Trek  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC