Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 19, 2024, 09:09:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Topic: This Film is Not Yet Rated 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: This Film is Not Yet Rated  (Read 4150 times)
Abagadro
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12227

Possibly the only user with more posts in the Den than PC/Console Gaming.


on: January 28, 2006, 09:59:11 PM

Sundance has been pretty anemic this year (one of the most meh I can remember), but I just got back from seeing the documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated which is about the MPAA system and how ridiculous it is. It features interviews with many of the filmmakers who have run up against the system (Aronofsky, Kevin Smith, Matt Stone, Wayne Kramer, John Waters) and also investigates the history and secret nature of the ratings board.   It itself got an NC-17 rating (for showing scenes that had to be cut form other movies to get an R) so I don't know exactly where it will show up. It was made with IFC money so it may show up on the IFC channel late at night sometime. I recommend it.

On an unrelated topic, this is first film I've seen that was filmed digitally that was also projected digitally and holy crap did it look good.

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

-H.L. Mencken
WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19268


Reply #1 on: January 30, 2006, 10:06:23 AM

Thanks for the headsup...will keep an eye out for it on IFC.

When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
Yegolev
Moderator
Posts: 24440

2/10 WOULD NOT INGEST


WWW
Reply #2 on: January 30, 2006, 12:01:04 PM

If you detect it on IFC, let me know because my TiVo-fu is weak.

Why am I homeless?  Why do all you motherfuckers need homes is the real question.
They called it The Prayer, its answer was law
Mommy come back 'cause the water's all gone
Abagadro
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12227

Possibly the only user with more posts in the Den than PC/Console Gaming.


Reply #3 on: January 30, 2006, 10:30:46 PM

I read a write-up in the local rag that said it will be on IFC this fall.

Another funny note is that the MPAA (which is behind the outrageous copyright expansions of late as much as the RIAA) made illegal copies of this movie to distribute internally.

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

-H.L. Mencken
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #4 on: January 30, 2006, 11:26:20 PM

This movie does sound interesting. The MPAA is really an odd thing. The review at aintitcool is worth a read.

What ratings movies are given, and somewhat directly what we can view, is decided by a secret group that has zero accountability. They aren't voted in, they aren't a representative sample and we don't even know who they are! It's amazing really.

At least I'd like these people to explain why crotch-hair is an NC-17 but a guy shooting another guy in the head is PG-13. Whether you argree with that or disagree it it seems nice to have someone actually make the case.

Hopefully this will come out on DVD cause I don't think I get IFC since I moved into a new place, which is a shame.

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
schild
Administrator
Posts: 60345


WWW
Reply #5 on: January 31, 2006, 01:42:56 AM

At least I'd like these people to explain why crotch-hair is an NC-17 but a guy shooting another guy in the head is PG-13. Whether you argree with that or disagree it it seems nice to have someone actually make the case.

I don't remember where I read it, but the FCC can't regulate violence. It's a good taste sort of thing that companies make TV cuts of movies, but essentially they regulate language and sex, but you could show people snuff films at 2 in the afternoon and the FCC really couldn't get on your back. Perhaps the MPAA has the same sort of regulations in place.
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #6 on: January 31, 2006, 05:19:07 AM

You don't think the MPAA requirements are the way they are because of the FCC's restrictions?  Chances are it's a direct relationship.

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Ironwood
Terracotta Army
Posts: 28240


Reply #7 on: January 31, 2006, 05:42:25 AM

Snuff films at 2 in the afternoon.  Good times.

"Mr Soft Owl has Seen Some Shit." - Sun Tzu
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #8 on: January 31, 2006, 06:46:00 AM

tazelbain
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6603

tazelbain


Reply #9 on: January 31, 2006, 07:42:11 AM

Miller v. California
So government can regulate obscenity and violence isn't obscenity.  Although some people are trying to get obscenity to include violence.

They should knock this censorship shit off and let the free market decide.  If it's good enough Social Security, its good enough for TV.

"Me am play gods"
Lt.Dan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 758


Reply #10 on: January 31, 2006, 09:36:49 AM

Miller v. California
They should knock this censorship shit off and let the free market decide. 

We did.  We got Hollywood for mainstream entertainment and we got the internet for nudity and porn.

HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42629

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #11 on: January 31, 2006, 12:20:01 PM

What ratings movies are given, and somewhat directly what we can view, is decided by a secret group that has zero accountability. They aren't voted in, they aren't a representative sample and we don't even know who they are! It's amazing really.

That's the same with the games ratings, comic books (used to be) and any other form of censorship out there that isn't government-mandated. Because really, the MPAA isn't a censorship body because they have no legal authority. They are an industry group that self-regulates in order to keep the government from actually legislating shit.

The problem isn't the MPAA, the problem is the incestuous, backwards-ass movie industry that is strangled by Hollyweird bullshit.

So, you know, it's like the Oscars. 8 nominations for Reacharound Ridge. Fab-ulous.

Abagadro
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12227

Possibly the only user with more posts in the Den than PC/Console Gaming.


Reply #12 on: January 31, 2006, 02:29:02 PM

Quote
The problem isn't the MPAA, the problem is the incestuous, backwards-ass movie industry that is strangled by Hollyweird bullshit.

As the film points out, this is one and the same thing. The MPAA is controlled by 8 companies that control 96% of all movies distributed and 90% of all media in this country.

It's kind of funny actually.  If you follow the chain of ownership, Brokeback Mountain was released and distributed by GE.

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

-H.L. Mencken
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Topic: This Film is Not Yet Rated  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC