Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 05:52:53 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Sports / Fantasy Sports  |  Topic: NFL 2013 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 70 Go Down Print
Author Topic: NFL 2013  (Read 528989 times)
Segoris
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2637


Reply #560 on: July 14, 2013, 01:44:52 PM

You could be a lot worse off at the position, I'll give you that. You could be the Jags, Raiders or Jets. Now THEY have fuckall for wideouts.

 why so serious?
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #561 on: July 14, 2013, 02:25:04 PM

The fact the Patriots get to play in that greasefire of a division is almost criminal.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #562 on: July 14, 2013, 04:00:04 PM

You know, Miami might be good this year. The Bills may even be competitive. The Jets though... no. Just... no.

WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19270


Reply #563 on: July 17, 2013, 08:30:38 AM


When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #564 on: July 17, 2013, 09:11:40 AM

I don't see how following the Cowboys has been bandwagon since the 90s, but then again people are still butthurt over that dynasty.  why so serious?

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
tazelbain
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6603

tazelbain


Reply #565 on: July 17, 2013, 09:17:18 AM

JJ is the quintessential rich douche bag. I don't think ripping on him and anything associated with him will ever cease to be entertaining.

"Me am play gods"
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #566 on: July 17, 2013, 09:26:14 AM

JJ is the quintessential rich douche bag. I don't think ripping on him and anything associated with him will ever cease to be entertaining.

It could only be better if Trump owned and NFL club.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #567 on: July 22, 2013, 08:44:02 AM

« Last Edit: July 22, 2013, 09:49:22 AM by sickrubik »

beer geek.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #568 on: July 22, 2013, 10:25:56 AM

Summer of Drugs.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #569 on: July 22, 2013, 10:35:45 AM

As far as OH GOD DRUGS go, I am so beyond not worried about pot and mdma, but the biggest sign of this is sheer stupidity, given it's right in the period of time when the NFL regularly test for recreational drugs.

Losing Dumervil, two executives popped for DUIs, now this. Just ugh.

beer geek.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #570 on: July 22, 2013, 10:37:49 AM

Denver has an image problem atm.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #571 on: July 22, 2013, 10:49:17 AM

Apparently the positive test was from his rookie season back in 2011?  If that's true the league certainly took its time in suspending him.

Over and out.
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12007

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #572 on: July 22, 2013, 10:50:42 AM

As far as OH GOD DRUGS go, I am so beyond not worried about pot and mdma, but the biggest sign of this is sheer stupidity, given it's right in the period of time when the NFL regularly test for recreational drugs.

Losing Dumervil, two executives popped for DUIs, now this. Just ugh.

Weed sure... but X? That has such a short half-life and at most would be in your system 5 days. You have to be able to know some kinda testing is coming up so why chance it that close to the testing windows? I don't even.... swamp poop

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #573 on: July 22, 2013, 10:54:08 AM

Athletes are dumb. Next question.  why so serious?

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #574 on: July 22, 2013, 11:03:01 AM

Apparently the positive test was from his rookie season back in 2011?  If that's true the league certainly took its time in suspending him.

I think that's being misunderstood. I think the report is coming out that he tested positive in 2011 ALSO, which would make, at least, his second offense, which would trigger the 4 game suspension.

The first is usually treatment/fine.

beer geek.
WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19270


Reply #575 on: July 22, 2013, 01:51:10 PM

Pot should be ignored, especially in WA and CO where it is legal. I would be willing to bet it gets written out of the next CBA.

When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #576 on: July 22, 2013, 01:59:40 PM

Pot should be ignored, especially in WA and CO where it is legal. I would be willing to bet it gets written out of the next CBA.

Not unless it becomes legal at the federal level.

Cyrrex
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10603


Reply #577 on: July 22, 2013, 10:58:19 PM

Pot should be ignored, especially in WA and CO where it is legal. I would be willing to bet it gets written out of the next CBA.

I want to get on board with this, but not sure if I can.  Can your employers in those states still legally hold it against you if it comes up in a piss test?  Sure, it is no longer criminal, but your employer can usually set higher standards than the law allows. 

"...maybe if you cleaned the piss out of the sunny d bottles under your desks and returned em, you could upgrade you vid cards, fucken lusers.." - Grunk
MrHat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7432

Out of the frying pan, into the fire.


Reply #578 on: July 23, 2013, 06:28:52 AM

Pot should be ignored, especially in WA and CO where it is legal. I would be willing to bet it gets written out of the next CBA.

I want to get on board with this, but not sure if I can.  Can your employers in those states still legally hold it against you if it comes up in a piss test?  Sure, it is no longer criminal, but your employer can usually set higher standards than the law allows. 

I think Employee contracts have to be rewritten as they stand on 'higher standards' now still.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #579 on: July 23, 2013, 07:12:19 AM

Sorry, I don't want my players smoking dope so much that they can't stop for 5 days for a drug test. I don't care about all the hippy bullshit about what it does and doesn't cause, it's done nothing but exacerbate every guy I know who smoked it religiously into a lazy fuck-up. Even worse, you want these guys are peak performance and smoking in general isn't going to help that at all.

I'm not saying people can't smoke it recreationally, but that's not what I would expect of million dollar athletes who supposedly look for every edge to stay fit.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #580 on: July 23, 2013, 07:34:11 AM

Well, if it was legal, and allowed there wouldn't be need for a test.

beer geek.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #581 on: July 23, 2013, 08:11:31 AM

Well, if it was legal, and allowed there wouldn't be need for a test.

The NFL could still restrict whatever substance they deem to be improper to the job. Any job has drug or alcohol policies, legal or otherwise.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #582 on: July 23, 2013, 08:24:15 AM

I don't care about marijuana smoking, tbh, other than the fact that it is still illegal in some places and could actually (and shockingly so) land someone in jail in the wrong spot.  It's entertainment.  If they can be fried out of their gourd and still catch a football (Randy Moss, ahem) then so be it.
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #583 on: July 23, 2013, 09:24:57 AM

Well, if it was legal, and allowed there wouldn't be need for a test.

The NFL could still restrict whatever substance they deem to be improper to the job. Any job has drug or alcohol policies, legal or otherwise.

Did you read where I said "and allowed"? You said "Sorry, I don't want my players smoking dope so much that they can't stop for 5 days for a drug test.", which is what I responded to. If it were legal and allowed, there would be no need for tests. That was my only clarification.

The larger point from that is that there could easily be a similar policy as there is to alcohol under the NFL. If the player smokes too much and it affects his play, that's on him. In addition to that, you have counseling issues just as you do with alcohol. Which isn't any different really as it is now on that end of it.

beer geek.
ghost
The Dentist
Posts: 10619


Reply #584 on: July 23, 2013, 10:44:40 AM

You know, if the NFL banned alcohol and instated pot instead it would probably help with their off the field violence issues.   why so serious?
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #585 on: July 23, 2013, 01:37:56 PM

Did you read where I said "and allowed"? You said "Sorry, I don't want my players smoking dope so much that they can't stop for 5 days for a drug test.", which is what I responded to. If it were legal and allowed, there would be no need for tests. That was my only clarification.

The larger point from that is that there could easily be a similar policy as there is to alcohol under the NFL. If the player smokes too much and it affects his play, that's on him. In addition to that, you have counseling issues just as you do with alcohol. Which isn't any different really as it is now on that end of it.

No I didn't see that. My mistake.

My point about smoking doesn't really have to do with the drug test. If you smoke daily, I'm not sure I want that guy on a pro team. Nor do I want the guy who drinks every day. They are punishing their bodies enough on the field without the off the field poisons that will screw with your healing.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #586 on: July 23, 2013, 02:16:30 PM

What are you expecting to happen if pot is legal, or what do you think a normal person drinks in a day?

beer geek.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #587 on: July 23, 2013, 02:31:12 PM

What are you expecting to happen if pot is legal, or what do you think a normal person drinks in a day?

If pot is legal I expect some NFL players will have problems with their newfound freedom in terms of making commitments. It's a multi-billion dollar business, and these guys are unfortunately mostly uneducated labor. Giving people that lack the tools to make good decisions even fewer restrictions isn't going to lead to the best behavior. That's why guys with alcohol problems on NFL teams right now usually get baby sitters. And when they don't you end up with situations like Josh Brent on the Cowboys.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #588 on: July 23, 2013, 02:40:00 PM

That's fine, but that shows there is a need for education rather than outlawing it. There's plenty of people that smoke and drink that have no problem controlling that. The people that have control issues likely already do, and would have problems with something else besides pot if it didn't theoretically exist. That's largely my point, alcohol is not banned, why would it be bad if pot wasn't banned. It just seems you fear something apocalyptic if it was suddenly legal. The dudes that would have issues with it are already smoking it.

beer geek.
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12007

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #589 on: July 23, 2013, 02:52:12 PM



As a Browns fan, I hate Jimmy Harrison and the Steelers. However, this picture is causing me some kinda of warped cognitive dissonance.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #590 on: July 23, 2013, 05:40:38 PM

That's fine, but that shows there is a need for education rather than outlawing it. There's plenty of people that smoke and drink that have no problem controlling that. The people that have control issues likely already do, and would have problems with something else besides pot if it didn't theoretically exist. That's largely my point, alcohol is not banned, why would it be bad if pot wasn't banned. It just seems you fear something apocalyptic if it was suddenly legal. The dudes that would have issues with it are already smoking it.

You are confusing two things. I have no real problems with pot being legal. I have problems with NFL players using it and pretending it doesn't affect them or their play. Everything you put in your body affects the way you live. Right now it's just one thing they can do in the NFL to regulate their players. Believe me, if the NFL could outlaw booze amongst their guys, they would.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #591 on: July 23, 2013, 05:55:18 PM

It seems like that would be a self-correcting problem, though.  If a player's performance is impacted on the field, he'll be replaced by someone who performs better.

Over and out.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #592 on: July 23, 2013, 06:21:50 PM

It seems like that would be a self-correcting problem, though.  If a player's performance is impacted on the field, he'll be replaced by someone who performs better.

Possibly, but in a cap league if you find that out mid-season, you're boned for the year. Also, who's to say teams would bother replacing them? What if they sign a big deal and then hit the bong hard getting lazy and fat? Would other guys get a shot? What about dead money? Right now my understanding is if you volatile the substance abuse policy of the NFL enough, a team can void your guarantees.

Tossing one more thing into the mix for NFL players to have out in the open without any fear of consequence doesn't sit well with me. Maybe it's not logical, but I barely trust them to be functional members of society even with the stuff we have legalized.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #593 on: July 23, 2013, 06:45:06 PM

Possibly, but in a cap league if you find that out mid-season, you're boned for the year. Also, who's to say teams would bother replacing them? What if they sign a big deal and then hit the bong hard getting lazy and fat? Would other guys get a shot? What about dead money? Right now my understanding is if you volatile the substance abuse policy of the NFL enough, a team can void your guarantees.

Well except for the possibility of voiding a contract, you don't need pot for any of that stuff.  Nothing is stopping a player from getting fat and lazy after signing a big contract already, other than losing his job to someone who's not fat and lazy.  Look at Chris Johnson, who's been terrible once he signed that big contract after holding out.  Yes, they gave another player a shot at his job but Javon Ringer turned out to be not much better than lazy Chris Johnson.  Point is, this is the NFL and players who perform poorly for whatever reason (pot or not) don't last long.

Over and out.
sickrubik
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2967


WWW
Reply #594 on: July 23, 2013, 10:24:13 PM

You are confusing two things. I have no real problems with pot being legal. I have problems with NFL players using it and pretending it doesn't affect them or their play. Everything you put in your body affects the way you live. Right now it's just one thing they can do in the NFL to regulate their players. Believe me, if the NFL could outlaw booze amongst their guys, they would.

I am not confusing anything, my point is as Nevermore is illustrating as well, is that the pot isn't the real problem in that context. There's a reason why it takes the NFL three strikes to punish pot before suspension. As Tom Nalen (former broncos center) said this week, "the NFL wouldn't be able to field any teams if they suspended players for 1st time weed offense."

Pot use isn't going to affect anything, or rather, will affect just as much as alcohol does. While the perception is that there is a MAJOR PROBLEM, in reality, it's still a very small portion of the player base that is getting in trouble.

I'm just not sure why we would expect players suddenly to fall into REEFER MADNESS.

beer geek.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 70 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Sports / Fantasy Sports  |  Topic: NFL 2013  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC