Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 16, 2017, 06:25:19 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
Donate! | Subscribe! | Shop: Amazon

***DONATION DRIVE 2 HAS BEGUN:
CLICK HERE TO BURN MONEY***
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  PC/Console Gaming  |  League of Legends  |  Topic: Why so few maps? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Why so few maps?  (Read 2597 times)
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


on: April 03, 2012, 10:26:17 AM

This games, what, a few years old. Why are there so few maps?

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Thrawn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3089


Reply #1 on: April 03, 2012, 10:31:37 AM

This games, what, a few years old. Why are there so few maps?

For the same reason the game doesn't have a replay function.  Because.....uhh.......hmm.....HEY LOOK A NEW CHAMPION!

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
Rasix
Moderator
Posts: 14142

I am the harbinger of your doom!


Reply #2 on: April 03, 2012, 10:48:04 AM

I'd hazard a guess that a large majority of people don't even play Twisted Tree Line or Dominion. Releasing more maps seems to be a losing proposition for them.  I'd be interested to see statistics on what's actually played, but I don't tihnk LoL wants to release those numbers.

However, an official ARAM/ARAB map would be pretty cool, and I'd be down for that. But I really have no desire to play 3s or LoL's take on Arathi Basin.  

Were their a variety of DOTA maps that saw a large amount of play?  And yah, the team that does something other than champion design doesn't seem to be large/active.  
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 12:10:12 PM by Rasix »

-Rasix
statisticalfool
Terracotta Army
Posts: 159


Reply #3 on: April 03, 2012, 11:06:21 AM

I think it's largely because there are probably a lot of cool things they could do as a one night mess-around with the map editor, just like a lot of custom DOTA maps were, but that getting it to their level of fit and finish is probably a lot bigger of a thing.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 37711

Prevent all damage that would be dealt to you and other troops you control.


WWW
Reply #4 on: April 03, 2012, 11:09:17 AM

I always figured it was because of the focus on competitive play - the big-time ranked tourney guys don't want to learn new maps, they want to own on the maps they have. Twisted Treeline doesn't get a lot of play at all, and Dominion is kind of relegated to deathmatch style games. They are both fun, but I haven't played either in close to a month now, and it doesn't seem as if the LoL guys want to try to add either to the competitive scene.

Thrawn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3089


Reply #5 on: April 03, 2012, 11:14:31 AM

However, an official ARAM/ARAB map would be pretty cool, and I'd be down for that. But I really have no desire to play 3s or LoL's take on Arathi Basin.   

Did were their a variety of DOTA maps that saw a large amount of play?  And yah, the team that does something other than champion design doesn't seem to be large/active. 

I'm going to guess the reason we haven't/won't see "official" ARAM or single draft mode has to do with using a random pool of champions when some people might only own the free week champs.  Which is a bummer, I'm really enjoying single draft mode in DotA 2 (you are given 3 random champions to chose from).

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
K9
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7435


Reply #6 on: April 03, 2012, 11:15:19 AM

Starcraft would suggest otherwise, there you have a ton of maps. Not all are used competitively and some are genuinely biased, but you can have diversity. I suspect the major limiting factor is the need to have the mobs pathing between bases, and with three lanes you only have so many practical topologies. I don't know why they haven't explored the possibility of more 5-player 2-lane maps though.

I love the smell of facepalm in the morning
Thrawn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3089


Reply #7 on: April 03, 2012, 11:25:39 AM

Well Molten Chamber should be released in 2011 so people can look forward to trying that.  why so serious?

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #8 on: April 03, 2012, 12:00:59 PM

I guess I just don't get why after...what 2 years or so there isn't more. Considering the "world" map looks to allow for more. It can't be that hard to make some variety.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
schild
Administrator
Posts: 55015


WWW
Reply #9 on: April 03, 2012, 12:04:59 PM

Quote
Did were their a variety of DOTA maps that saw a large amount of play?

That's a fun sentence.

Competitive games aren't about the number of maps, Bloodworth. Not even a little. Creating one balanced, fun map is hard enough. There's thousands of maps for counterstrike. People play on about 2 or 3 of them.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 12:07:20 PM by schild »
Rasix
Moderator
Posts: 14142

I am the harbinger of your doom!


Reply #10 on: April 03, 2012, 12:09:16 PM

I guess I just don't get why after...what 2 years or so there isn't more. Considering the "world" map looks to allow for more. It can't be that hard to make some variety.

New maps don't make them money, at least not directly.  They can sell you $7.50 spark ponies bi-monthly for little effort.  They're absolutely huge, and I think like WoW, they aren't going to deviate from their working business model until something start whittling down their player base.

Plus, it seems like their tools for creating new maps or implementing additional features are just not there.  I imagine their code base is a mess.  Someone asked recently why they couldn't just use the tutorial map for an ARAM, and their response was "it's hard coded, so it's basically a stand alone game.  There's no way to import it."

« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 12:11:54 PM by Rasix »

-Rasix
Rasix
Moderator
Posts: 14142

I am the harbinger of your doom!


Reply #11 on: April 03, 2012, 12:11:02 PM

Quote
Did were their a variety of DOTA maps that saw a large amount of play?

That's a fun sentence.

Competitive games aren't about the number of maps, Bloodworth. Not even a little. Creating one balanced, fun map is hard enough. There's thousands of maps for counterstrike. People play on about 2 or 3 of them.

Jerk. 

LoL pretty much is Summoner's Rift.  That's all it'll ever be on the competitive scene as well.  This does influence things.

-Rasix
Thrawn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3089


Reply #12 on: April 03, 2012, 12:14:05 PM

Would still love to see an ARAM rule set though, even though it probably won't ever happen.  Doesn't seem that hard though...just remove healing from the spawn completely, use a trimmed down one lane map, all random and you're done with the majority of it.  Although people would never agree on what the "correct" rule set is.

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #13 on: April 03, 2012, 12:25:26 PM

Right, because clearly you can't have competition on different layouts, or even themes.   awesome, for real   I get that a fun balanced map is work. But, its not like they haven't had some time to work that out. Kind of interesting, they have sold this idea, so they only need to add champs. Brilliant.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
pxib
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4287


Reply #14 on: April 03, 2012, 02:55:10 PM

They have a one-lane map. It's used in the tutorial section.

At the very least they could do a few more random pallet/model swaps like they have for Christmas and Halloween. Break up the monotony a little.
Thrawn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3089


Reply #15 on: April 03, 2012, 02:58:02 PM

They have a one-lane map. It's used in the tutorial section.

Plus, it seems like their tools for creating new maps or implementing additional features are just not there.  I imagine their code base is a mess.  Someone asked recently why they couldn't just use the tutorial map for an ARAM, and their response was "it's hard coded, so it's basically a stand alone game.  There's no way to import it."

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
pxib
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4287


Reply #16 on: April 03, 2012, 03:02:46 PM

Duhr herp dur.

My guess is that most people just want to play whichever map they think they're most likely to win on... and, if they think they're equally likely to win everywhere, they want the one with the shortest wait time. As a general tendency: After visiting and figuring out which new map is "best", that's quickly the only one anybody visits.
ezrast
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1935


WWW
Reply #17 on: April 03, 2012, 07:02:35 PM

I think that too much of the game is tied up in all the details of SR, and changing those requires tweaking so many other aspects to maintain balance that by the time you're done you can barely even consider the result to be League of Legends any more. Dominion, for example, has to apply a huge mana regen buff to all champions (in addition to all the free levels) to offset the more active play style and lack of blue. This in turn changes item balance because MP5 is devalued, and so on. One of the biggest reasons nobody plays Twisted Treeline is because there are so many champs that just aren't considered viable there.
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #18 on: April 05, 2012, 02:30:37 AM

I think that too much of the game is tied up in all the details of SR, and changing those requires tweaking so many other aspects to maintain balance that by the time you're done you can barely even consider the result to be League of Legends any more. Dominion, for example, has to apply a huge mana regen buff to all champions (in addition to all the free levels) to offset the more active play style and lack of blue.

This exactly.

I can't play Dominion because it's just a a totally different game. The value of items is different, the relative strength of champions is different, the important skills are different.

The map is not really separate from the game rules. A new map is a new game.

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
Furiously
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7183


WWW
Reply #19 on: April 06, 2012, 12:12:03 AM

I would like an all mid map.

Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #20 on: April 06, 2012, 03:37:44 AM

ARAM is pretty fun but the champion balance is atrocious. I played a couple All Draft All Mid games but the other team chose poorly and we completely crushed them worse than if the champs had been assigned randomly.

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  PC/Console Gaming  |  League of Legends  |  Topic: Why so few maps?  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC