Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: IP routing/ AT&T contact info help? (Read 4636 times)
|
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449
Badge Whore
|
For the last 5 days I've had problems connecting to my Guild's vent. It's not a problem with vent (and I'm going to strangle the 5 fucktards who keep saying it is and to enter the ip#.) but the routing to the server itself.
A tracert travels to ATT land at 12.122.87.62 then bounces around 4 times before dying.
9 -> cr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.87.62] 10 -> cr2.s19no.ip.att.net [12.122.2.61] 11 -> cr2.kc9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.22.89] 12 -> gar3.kc9mo.ip.att.net [122.123.130.89] 13 -> 12.88.210.110 14 -> Request timed out... Destination host unreachable.
I'm trying to reach 64.254.38.226 but that's what I wind up with. Since my ISP can't do anything, and nationvoice claims they're good I need some AT&T numbers so I can ask wtf they're doing. (All I find are the web contacts that need an account.) If anyone else has any ideas on what I can do to resolve this I'd appreciate it.
|
The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
|
|
|
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657
|
Can you ping the Vent server and what's the IP of that server?
|
|
|
|
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449
Badge Whore
|
Nope, can't ping the vent server. The IP is in the last bit above: 64.254.38.226.
|
The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
|
|
|
SurfD
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4039
|
I'm Located in Toronto.
I did a tracert on that address you said you were trying to reach: 64.254.38.226 got the following
9 28 ms 28 ms 28 ms 64.212.107.98 10 63 ms 75 ms 61 ms cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.81.58] 11 59 ms 59 ms 59 ms cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.1.2] 12 61 ms 59 ms 61 ms cr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.2.22] 13 60 ms 59 ms 59 ms cr2.kc9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.28.89] 14 61 ms 59 ms 59 ms gar3.kc9mo.ip.att.net [12.123.130.89] 15 67 ms 67 ms 71 ms 12.88.210.110 16 12.88.210.110 reports: Destination host unreachable.
Trace complete.
a ping to the same returned:
Pinging 64.254.38.226 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 64.254.38.226: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Assuming other people can connect to that vent, something is definately screwy for anyone on the East coast maybe?
|
Darwinism is the Gateway Science.
|
|
|
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449
Badge Whore
|
Yeah the west coast folks have no problems. I'm not sure how many east coasters there are, but I know that I and one other person can't connect at all. Several others can't do the fatal.nationvoice.com address and have to enter the IP manually.
|
The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
|
|
|
Reg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5281
|
I'm also in Toronto and get the same results as SurfD.
|
|
|
|
sanctuary
Terracotta Army
Posts: 90
|
In Western Australia
Tracing route to port064254038226.valnet.net [64.254.38.226] over a maximum of 30 hops:
6 79 ms 80 ms 79 ms i-10-0.sydp-core02.bi.reach.com [202.84.220.149] 7 228 ms 227 ms 228 ms i-2-1-1.wil-core02.bx.reach.com [202.84.140.38] 8 229 ms 229 ms 229 ms i-1-2.tlot03.bi.reach.com [202.84.251.238] 9 261 ms 336 ms 423 ms 208.175.201.5 10 264 ms 263 ms 264 ms cr2-tengig-0-7-3-0.losangeles.savvis.net [204.70.193.49] 11 263 ms 263 ms 263 ms er2-tengig-3-1.lay.savvis.net [204.70.198.10] 12 264 ms 263 ms 264 ms 208.174.194.66 13 307 ms 307 ms 307 ms cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.30.134] 14 304 ms 304 ms 304 ms cr1.slkut.ip.att.net [12.122.30.29] 15 308 ms 307 ms 307 ms cr2.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.30.26] 16 307 ms 306 ms 306 ms cr1.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.31.21] 17 308 ms 307 ms 307 ms cr1.kc9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.3.46] 18 307 ms 307 ms 306 ms gar3.kc9mo.ip.att.net [12.123.130.37] 19 315 ms 314 ms 314 ms 12.88.210.110 20 12.88.210.110 reports: Destination host unreachable.
Trace complete.
|
|
|
|
JWIV
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2392
|
Hrm. Fun. Both a west and east coast traceroute off of different networks are coming back with host unreachable.
Probably going to need someone to do a traceroute that's working to see where the path differs (or if the vent host is dual-homed and maybe the people working are using the other pipe).
East Coast Trace off of the AT&T route server route-server>traceroute 64.254.38.226
Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to port064254038226.valnet.net (64.254.38.226)
1 white-dwarf.cbbtier3.att.net (12.0.1.1) [AS 7018] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 2 12.89.5.13 [AS 7018] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec 3 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.2.6) [MPLS: Label 16748 Exp 0] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 4 cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.1.2) [MPLS: Labels 20486/16021 Exp 0] 36 msec 3 6 msec 36 msec 5 cr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.2.22) [MPLS: Labels 20105/16021 Exp 0] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 6 cr2.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.28.89) [MPLS: Labels 0/16021 Exp 0] 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 7 gar3.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.123.130.89) 36 msec 36 msec 36 msec 8 12.88.210.110 [AS 7018] 44 msec 44 msec 44 msec 9 * !H * route-server>
West Coast Trace off the Oregon-IX route server
route-views.oregon-ix.net>traceroute 64.254.38.226
Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to port064254038226.valnet.net (64.254.38.226)
1 vl-51.uonet1-gw.uoregon.edu (128.223.51.2) [AS 3582] 0 msec 200 msec 200 msec 2 vl-3.uonet9-gw.uoregon.edu (128.223.3.9) [AS 3582] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 3 eugn-car1-gw.nero.net (207.98.68.181) [AS 3701] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 4 eugn-core2-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.162) [AS 3701] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 5 ptck-core2-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.10) [AS 3701] 200 msec 200 msec 200 msec 6 ptck-core1-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.137) [AS 3701] 200 msec 212 msec 200 msec 7 so-6-1.hsa2.Seattle1.Level3.net (63.211.200.245) [AS 3356] 200 msec 204 msec 200 msec 8 ge-2-0-0-52.gar1.Seattle1.Level3.net (4.68.105.41) [AS 3356] 200 msec 208 msec 200 msec 9 att-level3-oc48.seattle1.level3.net (4.68.127.110) [AS 3356] 204 msec 200 msec 192.205.33.145 [AS 7018] 332 msec 10 cr2.st6wa.ip.att.net (12.122.146.178) [AS 7018] [MPLS: Label 16852 Exp 0] 200 msec 204 msec 200 msec 11 cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.31.129) [AS 7018] [MPLS: Labels 20458/16021 Exp 0] 204 msec 204 msec 200 msec 12 cr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.2.22) [AS 7018] [MPLS: Labels 20422/16021 Exp 0] 200 msec 200 msec 200 msec 13 cr2.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.28.89) [AS 7018] [MPLS: Labels 0/16021 Exp 0] 200 msec 64 msec 224 msec 14 gar3.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.123.130.89) [AS 7018] 200 msec 208 msec 200 msec 15 12.88.210.110 [AS 7018] 200 msec 200 msec 200 msec 16 * !H * route-views.oregon-ix.net>
|
|
|
|
Morfiend
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6009
wants a greif tittle
|
Yeah the west coast folks have no problems. I'm not sure how many east coasters there are, but I know that I and one other person can't connect at all. Several others can't do the fatal.nationvoice.com address and have to enter the IP manually.
I'm pretty much as west coast as you can get, and I cant hit that IP ether. I am in southern california. traceroute to 64.254.38.226 (64.254.38.226), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 wsip-98-174-154-145 (98.174.154.145) 0.938 ms 0.779 ms 1.032 ms 2 wsip-64-147-12-233 (64.147.12.233) 81.483 ms 36.431 ms 42.494 ms 3 wsip-64-58-133-221 (64.58.133.221) 18.897 ms 43.036 ms 57.195 ms 4 ip68-4-13-245 (68.4.13.245) 69.165 ms ip68-4-13-69 (68.4.13.69) 41.872 ms ip68-4-13-245 (68.4.13.245) 11.597 ms 5 rsmtdsrj02-ge600.0.rd.oc.cox.net (68.4.14.213) 4.592 ms ip68-4-13-93 (68.4.13.93) 10.670 ms rsmtdsrj02-ge600.0.rd.oc.cox.net (68.4.14.213) 3.315 ms 6 langbbr01-as0.r2.la.cox.net (68.1.0.230) 4.899 ms 9.012 ms 8.612 ms 7 ae-1-60.edge1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.144.7) 5.239 ms ae-4-90.edge1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.144.199) 5.302 ms ae-1-60.edge1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.144.7) 23.625 ms 8 level3-gw.la2ca.ip.att.net (192.205.33.229) 7.422 ms 192.205.33.225 (192.205.33.225) 10.003 ms 5.484 ms 9 cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.129.14) 51.603 ms 51.744 ms 51.939 ms 10 cr1.slkut.ip.att.net (12.122.30.29) 51.309 ms 51.033 ms 119.017 ms 11 cr2.dvmco.ip.att.net (12.122.30.26) 83.871 ms 51.908 ms 111.983 ms 12 cr1.dvmco.ip.att.net (12.122.31.21) 79.028 ms 51.569 ms 110.001 ms 13 cr1.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.3.46) 53.271 ms 51.256 ms 51.365 ms 14 gar3.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.123.130.37) 51.293 ms 64.914 ms 112.770 ms 15 12.88.210.110 (12.88.210.110) 128.894 ms 58.440 ms 112.642 ms 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * *
|
|
|
|
Lantyssa
Terracotta Army
Posts: 20848
|
That doesn't necessarily tell you anything as the server could just be blocking ICMP.
If you can get a reply with traceroute and one of the servers shows the reply time spike, then you have a culprit. Or if you can get a host some times, but not others.
DSLreports has some constant ping tools you may be able to find a problem with, but it's entirely dependent upon ICMP, which far too many machines block nowadays.
|
Hahahaha! I'm really good at this!
|
|
|
Ookii
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 2676
is actually Trippy
|
It's really a moot point, whoever is in charge of 64.254.38.226 has fucked up. Tell the admin to fix his shit.
|
|
|
|
Tmon
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1232
|
Your chances of getting help from AT&T (or any other provider you don't have an account with) are pretty much 0. They only care about paying customers and then only the big ones. They especially don't care about individual users trying to push Voice or VPN tunnels through their networks. If the guy hosting the server is a customer and has the right kind of data plan with them, he might get them to open a ticket and pursue it but it's a long shot.
|
|
|
|
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449
Badge Whore
|
Well crap. Meh, thanks folks.
|
The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
|
|
|
Chimpy
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10633
|
Your chances of getting help from AT&T (or any other provider you don't have an account with) are pretty much 0. They only care about paying customers and then only the big ones. They especially don't care about individual users trying to push Voice or VPN tunnels through their networks. If the guy hosting the server is a customer and has the right kind of data plan with them, he might get them to open a ticket and pursue it but it's a long shot.
Shit, my company pays AT&T millions a year for circuits and we can't get them to fix shit in any reasonable amount of time. And it really sounds like the vent hosting service has hosed something with their upstream provider or their equipment, if people can't get to it off of a canonical name then their DNS records are not propagating correctly either. OrgName: Terra World, Inc. OrgID: TERW Address: 200 ARCO Place, Suite 252 City: Independence StateProv: KS PostalCode: 67301 Country: US NetRange: 64.254.32.0 - 64.254.63.255 CIDR: 64.254.32.0/19 NetName: TERRAWORLD-INC NetHandle: NET-64-254-32-0-1 Parent: NET-64-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1-AUTH.TERRAWORLD.NET NameServer: NS2-AUTH.TERRAWORLD.NET Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE RegDate: 2001-01-24 Updated: 2001-06-27 RTechHandle: DS1958-ARIN RTechName: Schaub, Duane RTechPhone: +1-316-332-1616 RTechEmail: dschaub@terraworld.net OrgTechHandle: DS1958-ARIN OrgTechName: Schaub, Duane OrgTechPhone: +1-316-332-1616 OrgTechEmail: dschaub@terraworld.netLooks like from everyone's traceroutes, it is dying pretty much where AT&T would hand off to this dude (last 2 registered hops are routers in Kansas City, and the hop after that is an IP that is in the 12.x.x.x range which is AT&T's class A). www.terraworld.net redirects to http://www.valnet.net/
|
'Reality' is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
|
|
|
fuser
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1572
|
Shit, my company pays AT&T millions a year for circuits and we can't get them to fix shit in any reasonable amount of time.
And it really sounds like the vent hosting service has hosed something with their upstream provider or their equipment, if people can't get to it off of a canonical name then their DNS records are not propagating correctly either.
I'd say its some DDoS mitigation gone wrong. As everyone else has said start at the Vent provider and work back.
|
|
|
|
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23657
|
That doesn't necessarily tell you anything as the server could just be blocking ICMP.
Even if it did make it all the way through it doesn't tell you much cause routing these days for paths of any decent length are almost always asymmetrical (unlike the good old days). In other words the path a packet takes *to* a destination is not always the same path as the packet takes *from* the destination. So the hops you see in a traceroute typically only show one half of the true route and problems along the way, if any, are not necessarily caused at the spot shown in traceroute cause it could be a hop along the return path that's causing the issue.
|
|
|
|
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449
Badge Whore
|
Got the vent owner to talk to Nationvoice, since he started having problems too so suddenly he believed me. There's using a custom domain name for the vent server, and Nationvoice's custom server hosed its routing somewhere. I got the 'true name' (vent servers are demons?) of the server from the owner when he sent in the service ticket and was able to connect fine. They're doing reboots of the name server and our vent server to try and fix it now. I blame an unnamed/ unknown intern as I always do in these situations. Thanks folks.
|
The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
|
|
|
Lantyssa
Terracotta Army
Posts: 20848
|
If it's hosted, then yes it's likely it's a daemon. (I know next to nothing about Vent.) The name simply points to a specific path/port on the server. They can then host as many 'servers' as the machine has capacity for. Or likely a few more.  It's more of a server in the software client-server model sense if that is the case, we just think of it as its own machine since it has a unique URL.
|
Hahahaha! I'm really good at this!
|
|
|
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449
Badge Whore
|
If it's hosted, then yes it's likely it's a daemon.
The joke was apparently too fantasy geek for you. D-E-M-O-N not D-A-E-M-O-N.. unless you were punning on my geek joke about demons and true names. If that, then well played.
|
The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
|
|
|
Lantyssa
Terracotta Army
Posts: 20848
|
No, I was just too tired and skipping every other word when reading to get it. Since it would be a daemon process, you questioned if it was a 'demon', and the "true name" might mean a real designator, it kind of went over my head. Too geeky for my own good.
Though daemons and devils have true names, too, so it still works.
|
Hahahaha! I'm really good at this!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
 |