Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 24, 2025, 06:11:13 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  Gaming  |  Topic: Battlefield 1943 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Battlefield 1943  (Read 19082 times)
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


on: February 06, 2009, 08:16:50 AM

Battlefield 1943 Debut Trailer

Quote
However, that is not all coming from EA and DICE. Battlefield 1943 will be available for the PC, PSN, and Xbox Live Arcade and will offer multiplayer modes for up to 24 players with the “through-the-gun and vehicle warfare experience” DICE and the franchise are recognized for.

Yes, 24 not, 64, but take note of the buildings to the end of the video. (and trees)
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 09:04:37 AM by Mrbloodworth »

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #1 on: February 06, 2009, 08:51:54 AM

Now...I dislike the direction DICE has gone for a while now....but that looks pretty wicked.
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #2 on: February 06, 2009, 09:04:08 AM

Now...I dislike the direction DICE has gone for a while now....but that looks pretty wicked.

Its basically the bastard child of Battlefield, and Bad company.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Engels
Terracotta Army
Posts: 9029

inflicts shingles.


Reply #3 on: February 06, 2009, 09:18:42 AM

I'm confused and sad. How is the trailer a herald of anything different at all?

I should get back to nature, too.  You know, like going to a shop for groceries instead of the computer.  Maybe a condo in the woods that doesn't even have a health club or restaurant attached.  Buy a car with only two cup holders or something. -Signe

I LIKE being bounced around by Tonkors. - Lantyssa

Babies shooting themselves in the head is the state bird of West Virginia. - schild
TripleDES
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1086


WWW
Reply #4 on: February 06, 2009, 09:23:19 AM

Prettier BF1942...

What made the initial Battlefield game for me was the glitching. TNT jumping and all that shit.

EVE (inactive): Deakin Frost -- APB (fukken dead): Kayleigh (on Patriot).
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #5 on: February 06, 2009, 09:31:45 AM

Lots of good Battlefield news yesterday. 1943 looks decent, though I'm not sure about the 24 player limit. Bad Company getting made for the PC - meh, I could take it or leave it.

But a new patch is coming for both Battlefield 2 and 2142, which will also have a new map for each. Yeah, I'm all over that. Hopefully it'll fix some of the rampant cheats in 2142.

Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #6 on: February 06, 2009, 09:44:23 AM

I'm confused and sad. How is the trailer a herald of anything different at all?

Its seems to be a collection of the most popular 42 maps, redone, with destructible environments, that means physics and all that across a network, like Bad Company.

I really liked Bad Company. I love the fact that ill be able to play it with mouse and keyboard. To me, they dropped the ball with B2, and 2142 was just a bad B2 re-skin that stole Borrowed to much from Plantside, with out realizing what made PS great.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 09:46:49 AM by Mrbloodworth »

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #7 on: February 06, 2009, 10:12:57 AM

Slower planes, return of ships, great classic maps redone with modern tech, modern graphics...What's not to like? Herald of something different? I think you want to stick to MMO for that :)


Thanks to TripleDES for reminding me that exploiters will probably just ruin it for everyone and saving me the cost of buying it.
Samwise
Moderator
Posts: 19324

sentient yeast infection


WWW
Reply #8 on: February 06, 2009, 10:22:31 AM

 DRILLING AND MANLINESS
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #9 on: February 06, 2009, 10:32:02 AM

Slower planes, return of ships, great classic maps redone with modern tech, modern graphics...What's not to like? Herald of something different? I think you want to stick to MMO for that :)


Thanks to TripleDES for reminding me that exploiters will probably just ruin it for everyone and saving me the cost of buying it.

I'm in anyway.  Maybe we could open a private server so I can show off how terrible I am.  Damn I love WW2 era games.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Azazel
Contributor
Posts: 7735


Reply #10 on: February 06, 2009, 10:37:33 AM

Well, it looks good. I'm not sure how badly DICE might will fuck it up, though.   ACK!

http://azazelx.wordpress.com/ - My Miniatures and Hobby Blog.
TripleDES
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1086


WWW
Reply #11 on: February 06, 2009, 11:09:15 AM

Thanks to TripleDES for reminding me that exploiters will probably just ruin it for everyone and saving me the cost of buying it.
Shitty physics while FF off isn't exploits.

EVE (inactive): Deakin Frost -- APB (fukken dead): Kayleigh (on Patriot).
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #12 on: February 06, 2009, 11:15:50 AM

To me, they dropped the ball with B2, and 2142 was just a bad B2 re-skin that stole Borrowed to much from Plantside, with out realizing what made PS great.

You are on crack. I still play and love both B2 and 2142.

Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #13 on: February 06, 2009, 11:35:14 AM

To me, they dropped the ball with B2, and 2142 was just a bad B2 re-skin that stole Borrowed to much from Plantside, with out realizing what made PS great.

You are on crack. I still play and love both B2 and 2142.

To each his own. 2142 was terrible (Read: Buggy ass POS), and B2...well....yeah, just not my favorite in the line, and seemed to break from all the fun stuff of 42.  Ohhhhh, I see.

I don't think less of you for liking them  Oh ho ho ho. Reallllly? I had good times in the too... Just not for long. 2142 had some really cool stuff like titan assaults. Something we had asked for in PS a long time ago. Shitt, i wonder if i can find the posting on the PS boards where the exact same mechanic was illustrated and pitched (CHARTS!). The conspiracy in me things someone at dice was a PS fan.  why so serious?

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Prospero
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1473


Reply #14 on: February 06, 2009, 11:35:53 AM

Apparently they are trying to make 1943 casual friendly. I'll be curious to see how that turns out. As long as the planes are still awesome, I'm sold.
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 32117

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


Reply #15 on: February 06, 2009, 11:38:06 AM

Shitty physics while FF off isn't exploits.
Well, you can't really have FF on for a pub! Anyway, your post is contradicting itself. You were exploiting the shitty physics with FF off.

Part of the reason, probably the only reason, I loved 1942 so much was playing on private servers with a clan. FF on, no name tags, it was the way the game should've been experienced. Pubbing is so crappy, boring and pointless. Especially with DICE's abysmal server browser that seems to never get fixed game after game.

B2 was ok, but I hated the planes in it. The 1942 planes were so much more artful with their slower speeds allowing more surface-hugging and aerobatics, the slower bombs with their graceful arcs of death...but on pubs it was tard central trying to get into a plane, and forget a pub with FF on.

Nebu, a Bat Country 1943 server would rock. For two weeks  Ohhhhh, I see.
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #16 on: February 06, 2009, 11:40:14 AM

Nebu, a Bat Country 1943 server would rock. For two weeks  Ohhhhh, I see.

Woot!

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
NiX
Wiki Admin
Posts: 7770

Locomotive Pandamonium


Reply #17 on: February 06, 2009, 11:48:39 AM

Well, it looks good. I'm not sure how badly DICE might will fuck it up, though.   ACK!
You didn't play Bad Company, did you? If this is just WW2 Bad Company it's going to be awesome.
ahoythematey
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1729


Reply #18 on: February 06, 2009, 11:55:26 AM

24 people is plenty.  I am fucking down for Bat Country with this, assuming it works better than BF2.  I love that game, but goddamn it has problems.  And load times.

God the load times, they are a problem.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #19 on: February 06, 2009, 12:14:46 PM

Nebu, a Bat Country 1943 server would rock. For two weeks  Ohhhhh, I see.

If it's like the usual Bat Country FPS, 2 weeks is long enough to remind me that I'm too old to be competitive in an FPS.  Still... good for a few laughs.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
TripleDES
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1086


WWW
Reply #20 on: February 06, 2009, 02:14:11 PM

Well, you can't really have FF on for a pub! Anyway, your post is contradicting itself. You were exploiting the shitty physics with FF off.
Almost all pubs I've played BF1942 and BF2 on had FF on. If you don't think sending tanks or jeeps across the maps is hilarious, you're a sad person.

And FYI, most FF off servers were stunt servers. Can't really be exploiting if it's desired gameplay.

EVE (inactive): Deakin Frost -- APB (fukken dead): Kayleigh (on Patriot).
ahoythematey
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1729


Reply #21 on: February 06, 2009, 03:53:52 PM

Concerning Friendly Fire: only noobs prefer to play with FF off.
Ingmar
Terracotta Army
Posts: 19280

Auto Assault Affectionado


Reply #22 on: February 06, 2009, 04:33:06 PM

Concerning Friendly Fire: only noobs prefer to play with FF off.

<----- noob

The Transcendent One: AH... THE ROGUE CONSTRUCT.
Nordom: Sense of closure: imminent.
Azazel
Contributor
Posts: 7735


Reply #23 on: February 06, 2009, 04:38:00 PM

Well, it looks good. I'm not sure how badly DICE might will fuck it up, though.   ACK!
You didn't play Bad Company, did you? If this is just WW2 Bad Company it's going to be awesome.

I played the demo. But console FPS controls and all that. You know what I'm talkin' bout.

Their biggest failing is always the browser and gametypes. Though I've played less of the game each iteration (except VN goes somewhere around 2142)

http://azazelx.wordpress.com/ - My Miniatures and Hobby Blog.
ahoythematey
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1729


Reply #24 on: February 06, 2009, 06:03:38 PM

Concerning Friendly Fire: only noobs prefer to play with FF off.

<----- noob

Hey, it's all cool.  Everybody has to start somewhere.  Hell, even I used to prefer friendly fire off back when I was a noob.  Well, except for Doom2 LAN.  God that was some fun griefing.
Goreschach
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1546


Reply #25 on: February 06, 2009, 06:16:31 PM

I'm in the '42 was awesome, everything after sucked' camp. If this really is a return to the original gameplay style, I'd be up for it.
NiX
Wiki Admin
Posts: 7770

Locomotive Pandamonium


Reply #26 on: February 06, 2009, 06:36:41 PM

You know what I'm talkin' bout.
Yeah, I do. Bad Company was really fun and I usually hate the level up and unlock guns deal. There was something about the accessibility that made BF:BC so much fun and you had moments where you felt useful over a sustained amount of time. Best example was me rigged as a sniper, breaking a window to a boarded up house, sneaking into the attic and picking off enemy soldiers as they tried to advance up the road.
Hindenburg
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1854

Itto


Reply #27 on: February 06, 2009, 07:06:07 PM

Concerning Friendly Fire: only noobs prefer to play with FF off.

Concerning Friendly Fire: only noobs care. Cool kids own faces either way.  Ohhhhh, I see.

"Who uses Outlook anyway?  People who get what they deserve, that's who." - Ard.
ahoythematey
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1729


Reply #28 on: February 06, 2009, 07:44:48 PM

In theory, it shouldn't matter.  However, too often I've been to servers where the majority of players are using friendly fire being turned off as a crutch, and just blindly shooting at anything that moves, or shooting through their allies.  I won't stand for it!
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 07:53:48 PM by ahoythematey »
Azazel
Contributor
Posts: 7735


Reply #29 on: February 06, 2009, 10:41:26 PM

BC was on my "games to buy when they're really super-cheap" list, because I liked it reasonably for a FPS. Does it have a 3rd-person option? For some reason I can do shooters in 3rd person on the consoles wheras 1st just doesn't work.


http://azazelx.wordpress.com/ - My Miniatures and Hobby Blog.
Falwell
Terracotta Army
Posts: 619

Ghetto Gear Solid: Raiden


WWW
Reply #30 on: February 07, 2009, 03:00:15 AM

Twenty four isn't enough. Considering that of your team of twelve, at LEAST three will be camping planes and killing the guy who "steals" theirs. At LEAST one will be practicing driving tanks on the bottom of the ocean. At LEAST four will be snipers with three kills in four hours, and at LEAST one will be griefing the other team by placing explosive charges on the enemies landing boats, no, it isn't enough.


Not to worry though, it'll take the better part of a day before you start seeing 32+ player games being hosted.

« Last Edit: February 07, 2009, 03:04:17 AM by Falwell »
AcidCat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 919


Reply #31 on: February 07, 2009, 08:58:22 AM

If this really is a return to the original gameplay style, I'd be up for it.

I was pretty excited until I read about the gameplay changes  -  I can deal with less players, but cutting the classes down to 3, having regenerating health, unlimited ammo, and giving all classes anti-armor capability just totally changes the gameplay dynamic. I'll probably still pick it up but I don't know why they had to fuck with a great formula.
Jimbo
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1478

still drives a stick shift


Reply #32 on: February 07, 2009, 09:17:38 AM

Ya!  More Battlefield!  So that means Bad Co will get a PC port, Hero's will come out  NDA , & now this, plus the maps for 2142 & BF2!  Rock on, time to dig out and re-install both BF2 and 2142!

I've noticed some things, but CoD4 is better to play on Xbox live than on PC.  Something about only 9 people max per side and getting on a full server each game is more fun for me.  I liked Battlefield Modern combat for Xbox, but it never had the fun that BF2 or BF 2142 had, and I only played the beta for Battlefield Bad Co (was too busy with other games).  As long as I can drive a tank & blow people up it sounds good to me. 
Azazel
Contributor
Posts: 7735


Reply #33 on: February 07, 2009, 11:35:47 AM

I was pretty excited until I read about the gameplay changes  -  I can deal with less players, but cutting the classes down to 3, having regenerating health, unlimited ammo, and giving all classes anti-armor capability just totally changes the gameplay dynamic. I'll probably still pick it up but I don't know why they had to fuck with a great formula.

wait.

wat?

http://azazelx.wordpress.com/ - My Miniatures and Hobby Blog.
ahoythematey
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1729


Reply #34 on: February 07, 2009, 01:05:24 PM

...

Please tell me you're talking about Battlefield Heroes.
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  Gaming  |  Topic: Battlefield 1943  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC