Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 20, 2025, 08:32:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  The Gaming Graveyard  |  MMOG Discussion  |  Topic: Daoc going even more classic! 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Daoc going even more classic!  (Read 11152 times)
KallDrexx
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3510


on: May 10, 2008, 09:43:02 PM

http://www.camelotherald.com/polls/

Quote
Would you be interested in playing on a new Dark Age of Camelot server that does the following?

    * Brings back the Old Frontiers territory
    * Brings back the old Keeps, Relics, and related systems
    * Does not include the following systems or components:
          o Master levels
          o Champion levels
          o Artifacts
          o Minotaur Relics
          o Champion weapons
          o Mythirians
    * Focuses on the "classic" zone territories that existed prior to the expansion packs
    * Focuses mainly on the class types that existed prior to the expansion packs
    * No buffbots, but rather a universally available buffing option
HRose
I'm Special
Posts: 1205

VIKLAS!


WWW
Reply #1 on: May 10, 2008, 10:04:07 PM

Involution for the win.

That said it would be fun if they brought back old frontiers AND consolidated it into just one Emain shared by the three realms.

In any way it will only bring back not more than an handful of players.

-HRose / Abalieno
cesspit.net
schild
Administrator
Posts: 60350


WWW
Reply #2 on: May 11, 2008, 12:33:26 AM

HRose, do you have a Google Nerd Alert for things like "DAOC" and "PASTA?"

Edit: Here's you look for things to post in:



You've become a parody, dude.
eldaec
Terracotta Army
Posts: 11844


Reply #3 on: May 11, 2008, 01:46:00 AM

Classic (good) + Old Frontiers (meh) + no buffbots (good)

Thing is I would imagine most players left have sucked it up and got themselves a bot by now, so I don't really see this being as important as the original classic servers.

And I don't see the attraction of Old Frontiers.

"People will not assume that what they read on the internet is trustworthy or that it carries any particular ­assurance or accuracy" - Lord Leveson
"Hyperbole is a cancer" - Lakov Sanite
Xanthippe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4779


Reply #4 on: May 11, 2008, 06:23:39 AM

I liked old frontiers better than new because they were smaller.  I played Midgard. If I played Hib, then I probably wouldn't have liked it.
Falconeer
Terracotta Army
Posts: 11127

a polyamorous pansexual genderqueer born and living in the wrong country


WWW
Reply #5 on: May 11, 2008, 06:37:52 AM

I never saw him posting about pasta. That sounds like my territory.

Signe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 18942

Muse.


Reply #6 on: May 11, 2008, 08:23:38 AM

I will be making pasta this evening.

My Sig Image: hath rid itself of this mortal coil.
Cadaverine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1655


Reply #7 on: May 11, 2008, 08:31:53 AM

I offered to make the SO some fancy pasta with homemade red sauce of some sort, but she insists on making beef stew instead.   swamp poop

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.
waylander
Terracotta Army
Posts: 526


Reply #8 on: May 11, 2008, 03:54:47 PM

DAOC is almost dead as a game IMHO. AOC, once its more stable, will probably put a big dent in what's left of their population.

Lords of the Dead
Gaming Press - Retired
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #9 on: June 06, 2008, 10:37:05 AM

So I was reading up on this, and the amount of rose coloured nostalgia floating around the idea is going to create some spectacular fail.


Even all the gameplay and mechanics aside, DaoC plays like it is, old. You turn slow, You run slow, you 'slide' when you stop. People are going to come back from WoW or wherever, spend 5 minutes fighting the controls and go right back to where they came from.


I have a lot of  Heart for DaoC, but it's ARCHAIC. There is a lot of Lore/Flavour/Atmosphere in the three realms, lots of good ideas and unique ways of playing, but it's all half-assed or presented poorly.


Maybe I'll check it out if they offer another 'please come back, please' trial again, but I doubt it. The horse, she be dead.


Really, I want a DaoC 2, but that's probably MY nostalgia talking  Ohhhhh, I see.

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Brogarn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1372


Reply #10 on: June 06, 2008, 11:05:44 AM

I loved DAoC. Hands down favorite of the MMO's. But it's most certainly dead, Jim.
Xanthippe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4779


Reply #11 on: June 08, 2008, 07:16:56 AM

I'm pretty sure I can't play DAOC again, but I can still enjoy original Zelda for some odd reason.
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #12 on: June 08, 2008, 10:24:33 AM

I have issues playing the original, the SNES version I can play all day though.

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
KallDrexx
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3510


Reply #13 on: June 08, 2008, 07:35:53 PM

FAQ for if anyone cares.

Summary is theurgist gets removed (HAH), no expansions (not even SI, though midgard does get valks), no more bgs, level 20+ pvp objectives in the frontiers combined with anti-griefing methods, as well as a bunch of balance stuff (no mez longer than 20 or so seconds).

They are looking around august/sept to do this.

It's too bad daoc is passed it's prime cause I'd hit this.  Also leveling without catacombs would make me weep.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #14 on: June 08, 2008, 08:14:51 PM

If they address block rates and shield spec (9s anytime stun and engage need to be removed), I'll probably resub to play.  Sure, it will get boring after a few weeks but what the hell.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Simond
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6742


Reply #15 on: June 09, 2008, 03:55:54 AM

They are looking around august/sept to do this.
WAR must have slipped to 2009 then.

"You're really a good person, aren't you? So, there's no path for you to take here. Go home. This isn't a place for someone like you."
KallDrexx
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3510


Reply #16 on: June 09, 2008, 04:06:31 AM

WAR must have slipped to 2009 then.

My thoughts are more along the lines of WAR releasing around november or december, thus this is the "goodbye daoc" event, giving a few months of "refreshed fun" before everyone bails for WAR.
Murgos
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7474


Reply #17 on: June 09, 2008, 04:26:38 AM

I never saw him posting about pasta. That sounds like my territory.

I'm still not convinced that you two aren't the same person.  smiley

"You have all recieved youre last warning. I am in the process of currently tracking all of youre ips and pinging your home adressess. you should not have commencemed a war with me" - Aaron Rayburn
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #18 on: June 09, 2008, 08:09:34 AM

If they address block rates and shield spec (9s anytime stun and engage need to be removed), I'll probably resub to play.  Sure, it will get boring after a few weeks but what the hell.


I never thought I'd see the day when Sword and Board tanks were the new overpowered class.

Brings a tear to my eye.  cry

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #19 on: June 09, 2008, 11:04:45 AM

I never thought I'd see the day when Sword and Board tanks were the new overpowered class.

Brings a tear to my eye.  cry

They are pretty crazy when they get a lifetap (reavers) or a self HoT (valkyries) in 1v1.  Add that reavers get TWF and it's a painful fight against one. 

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #20 on: June 09, 2008, 12:56:15 PM

Ahh, Reavers were always a strong 1v1 class, Valks came in after I stopped playing so I only know 'of' them.



I was thinking more like Hero's and Warriors when I meant Sword and Board tanks (well warriors could switch on the fly). When I played DaoC, the only reaction my shield Hero brought from the enemy was "oh thank God, he doesn't have a fucking LargeWeapon!". My warrior had a similar effect, "Good, it isn't another zerk/savage!".

Still had the 'melee trinity' going then, so the only thing I was blocking was arrows, arrows and other sword/board users. Then they added the Bodyguard ability, but made it like, ML8 or some nonsense. So all those LargeWeapon hero's could do the Job I specced for, better then me, because I refused to sit through all that ToA shit... I stopped playing soon after.

/totally not bitter  awesome, for real

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Jimbo
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1478

still drives a stick shift


Reply #21 on: June 09, 2008, 01:16:39 PM

I didn't play past 2 months, hated the grind, and hated that meele was pretty pathetic.  They sure changed alot of the game it sounds like...

Would be cool to play a game where meele is king.
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #22 on: June 09, 2008, 01:21:56 PM

Really depended on which patch you were on. The Nerfs in DaoC shifted so much power among the classes so rapidly, you could literally go from God mode to RealmPoint Bag over night.


It was *never* small, gradual changes to abilities. Never minor tweaks. The used the sledge hammer or did nothing at all.

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
TheWall
Terracotta Army
Posts: 144


Reply #23 on: June 12, 2008, 07:40:43 AM

You weren't kidding. It seemed like I had to roll a new toon after most major patches because my previous one became unplayable. In fact the very first archer nerf was the reason I took an extended break from the game.
Numtini
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7675


Reply #24 on: June 12, 2008, 07:58:10 AM

Really depended on which patch you were on. The Nerfs in DaoC shifted so much power among the classes so rapidly, you could literally go from God mode to RealmPoint Bag over night.


It was *never* small, gradual changes to abilities. Never minor tweaks. The used the sledge hammer or did nothing at all.

And then you went to the bottom of the stack and you weren't looked at for 12-18 months. That was the part that really really stung. You knew it wasn't going to get fixed for a very very long time.

If you can read this, you're on a board populated by misogynist assholes.
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #25 on: June 12, 2008, 10:39:37 AM

Then there was the rationale from Mythic that "Lots of people still play the class, It can't be THAT bad!" in a game that (at the time) took months of shit-tastic grinding to have another RvR worthy character.


/still not bitter  awesome, for real

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
TheWall
Terracotta Army
Posts: 144


Reply #26 on: June 12, 2008, 12:23:12 PM

There was always a level 19 24 bondancer twink in thidranki to make you feel all better.  DRILLING AND MANLINESS

Edit: I forgot the levels for BGs. Oops.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42666

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #27 on: June 12, 2008, 01:25:47 PM

You know, I'd go back to DAOC if they pulled a free two months like EQ2 did. I might even stay after the free time was up, though that might won't necessarily translate into dollars for Mythic.

To pay to come back? No, not gonna do it.

TheWall
Terracotta Army
Posts: 144


Reply #28 on: June 13, 2008, 05:55:47 AM

I found some version of it on ebay about 4 months ago with every expansion on one DVD for like $20. So I picked it up and played for the free month. It was still very fun. The leveling is stupid easy now. I got to 49 without much effort and I played very casually. I wanted to try the classic servers. Trouble is there is so much new crap from all the expansions that it may as well have been TOA for me. Though admittedly the champion stuff was very doable solo. I'll probably go back for the new server though I'm really hoping they do a come back to camelot thing for it. The question is will I be able to stomach the crappy interface and slow movement beyond 2 weeks.
Numtini
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7675


Reply #29 on: June 13, 2008, 06:42:52 AM

I think it's really hard if not impossible to play a PVP game like DAOC or Eve or Shadowbane in any sort of casual way. You need to be attached to others, you need a solid guild/corp/whatever. You need to keep up on everything in the game. If you're going to be casual at pvp, you're better off doing sport pvp in wow.

If you can read this, you're on a board populated by misogynist assholes.
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #30 on: June 13, 2008, 08:49:08 AM

In DaoC, you could always latch onto the Zerg. Which is how most people got their PVP fix in DaoC. The game only *really* started to suffer once all the OTHER things wrong with it (DaoC), drove off enough players to seriously hamper the Zerg generation. Without a proper Zerg, the casual folks would just be meat for the hardcore gank groups which in turn would cause the casual folks to get frustrated and leave, which would shrink the Zerg some more, which would etc...


DaoC got really stupid if you were on a realm where /who frontiers resulted in 1 gank group, 1 stealth group and Me+AssBot defending a tower.


As long as the zerg was healthy, everyone could play, could contribute and could have fun. It also helped generate a sense of team across the realm and a sense of actual war, but without all the nasty Item/Territory loss from games like EVE or Shadowbane.

The only skill you needed to join a zerg, was knowing how to read the frontier map or work the /who command to find who owned the Frontier chat group currently.

and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27449

Badge Whore


Reply #31 on: June 13, 2008, 08:56:10 AM

I think it's really hard if not impossible to play a PVP game like DAOC or Eve or Shadowbane in any sort of casual way. You need to be attached to others, you need a solid guild/corp/whatever. You need to keep up on everything in the game. If you're going to be casual at pvp, you're better off doing sport pvp in wow.

You are 100% correct.  It's not just MMOs, but FPS and any competitive game.  I recall Sky talking about 'training sessions' for playing with his clan in BF:1942 and was aghast.  Sure, it makes sense but fuck that.  I'm here for fun, and in full-on PVP games, you simply can't do that without being a sheep or a random ganker.

The past cannot be changed. The future is yet within your power.
Brogarn
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1372


Reply #32 on: June 13, 2008, 08:57:02 AM

That's the first time I've ever looked at "teh zerg" in a positive light. I think you hit on something that I missed or took for granted in the past. Nice post, Fordel.
TheWall
Terracotta Army
Posts: 144


Reply #33 on: June 16, 2008, 06:54:39 AM

I ran solo in emain a lot. So usually I was playing dodge the zerg. So fun though to mezz someone off the back of the zerg and take them out when their group left them in the dust.  DRILLING AND MANLINESS
Fordel
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8306


Reply #34 on: June 17, 2008, 02:03:38 PM

Solo in Emain for my Hero usually meant hide behind the AM wall and hope it's our stealthers that own it currently.



and the gate is like I TOO AM CAPABLE OF SPEECH
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  The Gaming Graveyard  |  MMOG Discussion  |  Topic: Daoc going even more classic!  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC