Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 12:32:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Serious Business  |  Topic: Scarlett Johannson engaged to Van Wilder 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Scarlett Johannson engaged to Van Wilder  (Read 37552 times)
Viin
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6159


Reply #70 on: January 24, 2008, 02:50:27 PM

?
« Last Edit: January 26, 2008, 08:35:30 AM by Viin »

- Viin
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #71 on: January 26, 2008, 01:17:16 AM

There is fast twitch and slow twitch muscle. However you can't really switch between them and I don't know that there is any size difference anyway.

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #72 on: January 26, 2008, 01:10:31 PM


Edit:  There's no such thing as "lean" muscle.  There's just muscle.  If you're super desperate, you could just become wheelchair bound until your legs waste away Stephen Hawking style.

It never was supposed to indicate a different type of muscle. It's a distinction between training and dieting types. The term is used througout every aspect of fitness discussion.
dusematic
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2250

Diablo 3's Number One Fan


Reply #73 on: January 26, 2008, 02:44:48 PM

yes but almost always in a misleading way by the dieting/weight loss/exercise machine industries.  I mean we can talk about someone who "looks" lean.  But "building" lean muscle?  Not appropriate. 
« Last Edit: January 26, 2008, 02:48:24 PM by dusematic »
Samwise
Moderator
Posts: 19324

sentient yeast infection


WWW
Reply #74 on: January 26, 2008, 04:27:54 PM

Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #75 on: January 26, 2008, 04:42:21 PM

stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #76 on: January 26, 2008, 04:56:10 PM

yes but almost always in a misleading way by the dieting/weight loss/exercise machine industries.  I mean we can talk about someone who "looks" lean.  But "building" lean muscle?  Not appropriate. 

I don't know what you're talking about.
Samwise
Moderator
Posts: 19324

sentient yeast infection


WWW
Reply #77 on: January 26, 2008, 05:14:04 PM

Llava
Contributor
Posts: 4602

Rrava roves you rong time


Reply #78 on: January 26, 2008, 07:51:08 PM

Samwise once again proves that you can be glib without uttering a single word.

That the saints may enjoy their beatitude and the grace of God more abundantly they are permitted to see the punishment of the damned in hell. -Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #79 on: January 26, 2008, 08:40:54 PM

I welcome his glibness. I don't want to argue about any of the things dusematic thinks I want to argue.
lamaros
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8021


Reply #80 on: January 27, 2008, 01:36:36 AM

Yeah, using words correctly is kinda frowned on in these parts.
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #81 on: January 27, 2008, 11:07:31 AM

I use the word the only way it's been used in all fitness discussion since I could remember. "Lean muscle" will give you over 2 million results in Google -- so I'm not some isolated case of oddity to warrant any of you geeking out about it. A lot of people say it. Nor I can find one example of someone making the fallacy of using it to indicate an actual biological distinction in muscle fibers -- so I have no idea what "machine" dusematic is trying to rage against here. If there is one, it's not big enough to bring it up and project that on to me. It's always meant to signify diet and training regimen, nothing more.

Now post a funny gif or shut the fuck up, please. Not every subject needs to be some outlet for "debate". For crissakes.
dusematic
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2250

Diablo 3's Number One Fan


Reply #82 on: January 27, 2008, 01:05:43 PM

I'm not raging, dipshit.  You're simply being a douchebag because you were talking out of your ass and someone called you on it.  "Lean muscle" returns 2 million Google hits?  Irrelevant.  "Poopy pants" returns 47,000.  What the fuck is your point?  Lean muscle is almost as redundant and stupid as saying "fatty fat."  All fat is fat you fucking idiot.  All muscle is muscle.  There is no debate.  You're wrong.  Deal with it bitch.
Samwise
Moderator
Posts: 19324

sentient yeast infection


WWW
Reply #83 on: January 27, 2008, 01:07:49 PM

dusematic
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2250

Diablo 3's Number One Fan


Reply #84 on: January 27, 2008, 01:14:57 PM

yes but almost always in a misleading way by the dieting/weight loss/exercise machine industries.  I mean we can talk about someone who "looks" lean.  But "building" lean muscle?  Not appropriate. 

I don't know what you're talking about.


I'm talking about how someone like you could end up sounding like such a complete idiot.  Get it now?
schild
Administrator
Posts: 60350


WWW
Reply #85 on: January 27, 2008, 01:29:26 PM

stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #86 on: January 27, 2008, 01:41:52 PM

[edit] Actually, I'm pretty speechless here. What the hell is all of this anger about? It's like you're expecting me to represent a point of view that I don't even hold, just so you can fight with me. And now that I don't hold that view, you want to get angry about that too. I'm sorry I can't oblige, but please, get a grip. This isn't worth your rage.

And yes, you are raging. That much is evident.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2008, 02:07:22 PM by Stray »
dusematic
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2250

Diablo 3's Number One Fan


Reply #87 on: January 27, 2008, 02:16:33 PM

Dude, please. This is basically your MO.  The most recent example being the book thread spat between you and Schild that got denned.  Periodically, you say a bunch of stupid shit, someone calls you on it, and then you throw a hissy fit. 
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #88 on: January 27, 2008, 05:18:22 PM

My MO? I probably have a record around here for saying "my bad", "sorry", "oh, I was wrong", or "I stand corrected" when things get to that point. I'm almost sure of it. I hardly have a problem with being wrong about things. It's not some big priority of mine to be "right".

I barely argued with Schild in that book thread. Not sure why that stands out to you. It was like two or three exchanges, we disagreed, and left it at that. Fine with me. But since when did it get resolved? Was he just declared right by fiat? I missed that part.

And as far you go, I don't even see what you're "calling me out" on. At least me and Schild actually had a clear difference of opinion. While all I see here is someone pissed about something other people supposedly said -- and then blamed me for it! Then I tell you "I don't know what you're talking about" when it came to these hypothetical people. After that, you somehow managed to find a way to take offense when I said "I don't know", and started talking like a maniac. Ooohkay.

I have no clue what "hissy fit" I'm guilty of either. I'm amused. It never ceases to amaze me how mundane subjects like this can go sour at F13. Serious business indeed.
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #89 on: January 27, 2008, 09:02:42 PM

What exactly would "lean muscle" be? What makes muscle "lean" exactly?

By the way if I google "lean muscle" the first few links are all to marketing BS and the next is to a discussion like this one with people questioning the term.

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #90 on: January 27, 2008, 10:36:43 PM

I can't answer your second question (because, again, I never made a literal distinction between types of muscle), but I'll answer the first.

Lean muscle, again, is simply what I used to signify training that focuses on bulking up, while at the same time burning fat (and one without an emphasis on an insane protein intake) -- not literal biological differences. Now that I know what a fuss this has caused though, I could admit that it sounds strange. Perhaps the better set of terms would be "lean musculature" (or something to that effect) -- because that's all that is meant.

What sparked this conversation was when I was comparing Bruce Lee's training with that of a typical beefed up actor (like Christian Bale). Someone was under the impression that since a guy might be bigger than Lee, then it would follow that he worked harder than Lee. Which wouldn't be the case. Lee was superhumanly out of his fucking mind, as far as hard training goes. What he and others like him did require as much work as guys twice as big -- unlike them, he basically had no body fat at all. A guy with a physique like Bale still has a bit of fat surrounding his muscles (which can be told just by appearances), and if that's the case, has fat between muscle sinew as well. Both give off the illusion of having more bulk than one has. Also worth mentioning is the route these bulkier types take to achieve their look -- they boost up on creatine, which pulls water into your muscles, ballooning them up.

Don't make too big a deal about me using the Google hit thing either. The only reason why I mentioned it is because some of you were acting all shocked and shit, like I just made up the word.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2008, 10:41:31 PM by Stray »
Margalis
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12335


Reply #91 on: January 27, 2008, 10:42:06 PM

Ok, understood, lean musculature is a much better term, or just lean in general.

I look pretty lean myself. A sexy beast.

vampirehipi23: I would enjoy a book written by a monkey and turned into a movie rather than this.
lamaros
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8021


Reply #92 on: January 27, 2008, 10:53:53 PM

Don't make too big a deal about me using the Google hit thing either. The only reason why I mentioned it is because some of you were acting all shocked and shit, like I just made up the word.

I can't speak for everyone, but as far as I can tell you were just acting like a dick.

On another note, being really lean is bad for you. Bicycle riders get the leanest and they only do it for short periods of time. It's not healthy.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2008, 10:56:05 PM by lamaros »
stray
Terracotta Army
Posts: 16818

has an iMac.


Reply #93 on: January 27, 2008, 10:56:15 PM

No really, I wasn't. I'd never deny it if I was either.

Or at the very least, I wasn't being a dick anymore than usual.

[edit] As for the lean being bad thing, that's the first I've heard of it. Got any links? I don't know what to think about that. I would suspect that it'd be ideal to be as lean as any typical wild predator is.

On a sidenote, I live in one of the fattest cities in the world. I'm nowhere near 0% body fat (and never will be, I imagine), but I am lean. Every once in awhile, I run into a fat person who tries to make me feel bad about it... By saying just that -- that's it's not "healthy". Like I'm not the normal one. Heh.

By the way, this has nothing to do with what you're saying lamaros.. I know you're talking about extremities (I think?). It just reminds of it.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2008, 11:15:47 PM by Stray »
dusematic
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2250

Diablo 3's Number One Fan


Reply #94 on: January 28, 2008, 12:41:21 AM

I love lamp lean.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #95 on: January 28, 2008, 06:15:00 AM

I hear physicians describe fitness regimen as building "lean muscle" all the time.  The term is used to denote a specific type of workout routine where the ratio  of muscle to fat is high relative to more traditional weight gaining methods.  Yes, you are correct in stating that muscle is muscle.  I think you're being a bit overly critical of Stray though.  The term gets thrown around a lot among health professionals.  I think the term gets as much play as it does because gaining weight through training that is largely due to the building of muscle mass with limited fat is one of the tougher things any athlete can do. 

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Soukyan
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1995


WWW
Reply #96 on: January 28, 2008, 07:05:31 AM

So it's an oxymoron. Woo. We've got loads of oxymorons in the English language. Lean muscle or muscle, same difference. Good grief this thread makes me want to issue a silent scream. Some people were clearly misunderstood and passive aggressive behavior ensued. We're a small crowd here at the forums, but in the interest of being left alone together, we could make peace and go get legally drunk and listen to some soft rock, because nobody likes a butt head, and I would hate to have to call in the peace force, because that would be almost exactly the same difference as what has already occurred. Oh, and British fashion is as much an oxymoron as the living dead.  Oh ho ho ho. Reallllly?

"Life is no cabaret... we're inviting you anyway." ~Amanda Palmer
"Tree, awesome, numa numa, love triangle, internal combustion engine, mountain, walk, whiskey, peace, pascagoula" ~Lantyssa
"Les vrais paradis sont les paradis qu'on a perdus." ~Marcel Proust
Broughden
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3232

I put the 'shill' in 'cockmonkey'.


Reply #97 on: January 29, 2008, 02:55:04 AM

Are you fucking kidding me? This is a Scarlett Johannson thread which should contain copius amounts of pictures of her breasts. Instead we have people getting all angsty McAngst on the term "lean muscle"?

 swamp poop


The wave of the Reagan coalition has shattered on the rocky shore of Bush's incompetence. - Abagadro
Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #98 on: January 29, 2008, 06:45:48 AM

Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #99 on: January 29, 2008, 06:59:10 AM

Are you fucking kidding me? This is a Scarlett Johannson thread which should contain copius amounts of pictures of her breasts. Instead we have people getting all angsty McAngst on the term "lean muscle"?

 swamp poop



Right on. Lets get back to johannson and stop talking about beefy McBeefersion.








There, that should clean off the manliness left on this thread.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2008, 07:04:02 AM by Mrbloodworth »

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Signe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 18942

Muse.


Reply #100 on: January 29, 2008, 07:10:20 AM

You're all wrong.  This is a thread about the beautiful body of some guy who played some bloke named Van Wilder in a film I didn't see! 






So there.

My Sig Image: hath rid itself of this mortal coil.
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #101 on: January 29, 2008, 07:12:05 AM

Fair enough.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Ironwood
Terracotta Army
Posts: 28240


Reply #102 on: January 29, 2008, 08:29:21 AM

That boy really did buff up a bit, didn't he ?

"Mr Soft Owl has Seen Some Shit." - Sun Tzu
Signe
Terracotta Army
Posts: 18942

Muse.


Reply #103 on: January 29, 2008, 08:43:58 AM

He did.  It sort of reminds me of Jeff Goldblum.  He was some tall skinny goofy guy and then The Fly happened and he had a new body.

My Sig Image: hath rid itself of this mortal coil.
WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19270


Reply #104 on: January 29, 2008, 08:55:36 AM

Except Ryan Reynolds drips charisma (buff or not), while Jeff Goldblum is genuinely creepy.

When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Serious Business  |  Topic: Scarlett Johannson engaged to Van Wilder  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC