| 
	
		| 
				
					| Pages: [1]   |  |  |  
	
		|  Author | Topic: HTML/Website question for any gurus here  (Read 2228 times) |  
	| 
			| 
					
						| Bunk 
								Contributor 
								Posts: 5828
								
								Operating Thetan One | 
 |  
						| 
 "Welcome to the internet, pussy." - VDL"I have retard strength." - Schild
 |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| HaemishM 
								Staff Emeritus 
								Posts: 42666
								
								the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring   | 
 You could put a script on your page that checks the client for the cookie you are looking for and if they don't have that cookie, it drops it on them. Or if you want to jerry-rig it, create a page on your site that drops the cookie but isn't the home page that drops the cookie on them when they go to the page.  |  
						| 
 |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| Sky 
								Terracotta Army 
								Posts: 32117
								
								I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'. | 
 Or if you want to jerry-rig it, create a page on your site that drops the cookie but isn't the home page that drops the cookie on them when they go to the page. 
 I usually block any cookies not originating from that site, so that might be a problem. |  
						|  |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| naum 
								Terracotta Army 
								Posts: 4263
								
								   | 
 Image cookies.
 But the "image URL" is not really an image — well it can serve up an invisible .gif/.png, but it will be a PHP/Ruby/Perl/$OtherWebScriptingOrProgrammingLanguage invocation that squirts a cookie out…
 
 
 |  
						| 
 "Should the batman kill Joker because it would save more lives?" is a fundamentally different question from "should the batman have a bunch of machineguns that go BATBATBATBATBAT because its totally cool?". ~Goumindong |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| naum 
								Terracotta Army 
								Posts: 4263
								
								   | 
 Or if you want to jerry-rig it, create a page on your site that drops the cookie but isn't the home page that drops the cookie on them when they go to the page. 
 I usually block any cookies not originating from that site, so that might be a problem./ditto But most web visitors are not that savvy, or even possess a desire to toggle on what you and I believe to be a preferable online setting… |  
						| 
 "Should the batman kill Joker because it would save more lives?" is a fundamentally different question from "should the batman have a bunch of machineguns that go BATBATBATBATBAT because its totally cool?". ~Goumindong |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| Ookii 
								Staff Emeritus 
								Posts: 2676
								is actually Trippy   | 
 Privacy defaults to medium in IE which automatically blocks cookies for third party websites. |  
						| 
 |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| naum 
								Terracotta Army 
								Posts: 4263
								
								   | 
 Privacy defaults to medium in IE which automatically blocks cookies for third party websites.
 Eh, my testing has revealed that IE7 privacy settings are highly arbitrary and even going in and fiddling with non-related settings can set/unset other settings… |  
						| 
 "Should the batman kill Joker because it would save more lives?" is a fundamentally different question from "should the batman have a bunch of machineguns that go BATBATBATBATBAT because its totally cool?". ~Goumindong |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| Trippy 
								Administrator 
								Posts: 23657
								
								 | 
 Why aren't they checking the sid URL parameter in addition to checking the cookie?
 |  
						|  |  |  |  | 
			| 
					
						| Bunk 
								Contributor 
								Posts: 5828
								
								Operating Thetan One | 
 Well, if default settings in IE prevent third party cookies (which really, they should) then I probably won't bother. Thanks for the ideas though. |  
						| 
 "Welcome to the internet, pussy." - VDL"I have retard strength." - Schild
 |  |  |  |  |  
	
		| 
				
					| Pages: [1]   |   |  |  
	
 
  |