Title: Watches Post by: stray on July 21, 2005, 11:49:00 AM My generation would probably have to take the blame for ridiculously oversized trousers as well. I can't throw stones at another generation when it comes to bad pants: (http://80sguy85.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/parachutepants.jpg) Aww hell, those are the shit man. By the time I was old enough to fit in them, I had to jack my brother's old pants. You guys had great things: Swatches Checker vans Feathered haircuts Izods Title: Re: Watches Post by: Strazos on July 21, 2005, 11:53:40 AM Um, we still have Izod and Swatches.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 21, 2005, 12:00:07 PM Um, we still have Izod and Swatches. It just isn't the same: (http://home.earthlink.net/~marutgers/fun/Objects/swatch.gif) Today (http://homepage1.nifty.com/gsc/Swatch4.jpg) Yesterday Title: Re: Watches Post by: Strazos on July 21, 2005, 12:03:12 PM Um, we still have Izod and Swatches. It just isn't the same: Thankfully. I like my Swatch just the way it is. (http://store.swatch.com/watch/YCS408G) Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 21, 2005, 12:18:26 PM I never wear a watch. Time doesn't make any sense to me. I bought Righ a totally awesome looking Oakley Bullet watch for his birthday one year, but he hated it so I returned it. :cry: I was gutted. I thought it was the coolest looking thing ever. Anyway, I got him sunglasses instead. Ho-hum.
I found a pic of one! (http://www.rubensmenswear.com/pages/photographs/oakley/accessories/watches/bullet/images/bullet_carbon_fiber.jpg) Is that not the coolest watch ever? Or do I have really sucky taste? Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 21, 2005, 12:23:09 PM I like me some sunglasses too. I love the blue GA's I bought in Florence. How much? Title: Re: Watches Post by: Strazos on July 21, 2005, 12:35:19 PM I think the prices exchanges back into something around $160-$170 USD. I would have to find the receipt.
I almost bought some sick Versace glasses too, but I had to control myself. EDIT: Possibly these, but they were cheaper in Florence (http://www.sunglasshut.com/sghus.cfm?dir=templates&page=productpage&sitecategory=sunglasses&nproductid=158832) Title: Re: Watches Post by: Daydreamer on July 21, 2005, 12:43:16 PM I've seen something like 20 states in the US, from urban to rural, and perhaps the funniest thing in all my travels was the fact that I saw the most foakley glasses and folex watches inside our nations capital, surrounding the major museums and parks and monuments. In fact I think I still have a pair somewhere around here....
Title: Re: Watches Post by: HaemishM on July 21, 2005, 12:47:24 PM I never wear a watch. Time doesn't make any sense to me. I bought Righ a totally awesome looking Oakley Bullet watch for his birthday one year, but he hated it so I returned it. :cry: I was gutted. I thought it was the coolest looking thing ever. Anyway, I got him sunglasses instead. Ho-hum. I found a pic of one! (http://www.rubensmenswear.com/pages/photographs/oakley/accessories/watches/bullet/images/bullet_carbon_fiber.jpg) Is that not the coolest watch ever? Or do I have really sucky taste? That goes on your arm? It looks like a time amoeba has clamped onto your wrist and is sucking for dear life. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 21, 2005, 12:50:16 PM Oh. I guess he was right and it is ugly. Why do I like it so much?
Title: Re: Watches Post by: HaemishM on July 21, 2005, 12:50:34 PM You have a thing for one-celled lifeforms?
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Fargull on July 21, 2005, 12:51:43 PM Looks like it should go on your ankle.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: schild on July 21, 2005, 02:27:36 PM (http://www.tokyoflash.com/pics/PIM003_L4.jpg)
I don't know what that other watch in this thread is, but the picture above is a WATCH. Booyakasha. Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 21, 2005, 02:36:05 PM I'm an analog and/or gears and cranks kind of guy myself. Color is nice too.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: schild on July 21, 2005, 03:31:49 PM Tis a good watch, but I'm getting one of the following 3:
(http://www.tokyoflash.com/pics/CYP001_L1.jpg) (http://www.tokyoflash.com/pics/PIM007_L1.jpg) (http://www.tokyoflash.com/pics/TWE002_L3.jpg) Title: Re: Watches Post by: WayAbvPar on July 21, 2005, 03:33:00 PM Who needs a watch? I have a clock in my system tray, and a clock on my cell phone on those rare occasions when I am away from my PC.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Paelos on July 21, 2005, 03:40:38 PM (http://www.blitzwatches.co.uk/images/16710.jpg)
I wear this one. It matches my Georgia Bulldog school colors. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Shockeye on July 21, 2005, 03:43:29 PM I'm with WayAbvPar on this. You're all pretentious pricks.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Hanzii on July 21, 2005, 03:45:02 PM Since this thread has become something actually interesting, you guys with all the pictures of watches - point me towards a good (usefull) diverswatch, that I could wear on dry land. That's all I need (i probably couldn't part with more than $1500)
(and regarding design, I like Signes watch more than Paelos') Title: Re: Watches Post by: schild on July 21, 2005, 03:45:49 PM There's something to be said about most classic technology. It's boring.
That goes for nearly everything except vacuum tubes. If I'm getting a classic watch, it's a Movado. I am a pretentious prick. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Paelos on July 21, 2005, 03:48:53 PM I didn't get the watch because of the design really, though. I got it because it will last forever. IMO, buy a really nice watch when you are young that is very well made. $3k for 50 years of use is an excellent value.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Hanzii on July 21, 2005, 03:59:59 PM There's something to be said about most classic technology. It's boring. That goes for nearly everything except vacuum tubes. If I'm getting a classic watch, it's a Movado. (http://www.movado.com/selector/results.cfm?Category=Sport%20Luxury&pgNumber=1&thisImg=8) Nice watches, but since I never go on dive trips wearing a dress, I'll pass. Title: Re: Watches Post by: schild on July 21, 2005, 04:04:43 PM Boooo. Meanie. I meant something like this:
(http://www.movado.com/selector/large/0604460.jpg) And I wasn't talking about diving. Nyah nyah. Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 21, 2005, 04:11:57 PM As long as it's not gold, a vintage pocket watch, or uses Pierce Brosnan as an endorser, I don't see how watches are for pretentious pricks.
I've got no problem with classic technology: (http://wristfashion.com/imgsrc//vrbg.jpg) Title: Re: Watches Post by: Samwise on July 21, 2005, 04:28:08 PM Since I stopped wearing watches I've been a happier person. I like not always knowing what time it is.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 21, 2005, 04:54:10 PM Since I stopped wearing watches I've been a happier person. I like not always knowing what time it is. Me too. Time is just annoying. Title: Re: Watches Post by: MrHat on July 21, 2005, 07:32:21 PM Since I stopped wearing watches I've been a happier person. I like not always knowing what time it is. Me too. Time is just annoying. Agreed. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Daydreamer on July 21, 2005, 08:04:13 PM Since I stopped wearing watches I've been a happier person. I like not always knowing what time it is. Me too. Time is just annoying. Agreed. I dunno, Quarm was kinda cool. Title: Re: Watches Post by: penfold on July 22, 2005, 01:06:09 AM Im looking to get a Chronoswiss (http://www.chronoswiss.com/eng/) (expensive) or the Moonwatch Speedmaster Professional (http://www.accutronservice.com/omega_speedmaster.htm) (original steel, hesalite crystal and leather strap model is still available - model 3570.50.00 ) The Moonwatch, with its technical specs and durability, as well as its history makes it very appealing.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Strazos on July 22, 2005, 01:31:00 AM Heh, my watch was ~$135 USD.
I need a nice TAG. I need a real job, eventually. Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 22, 2005, 02:44:18 AM Since this thread has become something actually interesting, you guys with all the pictures of watches - point me towards a good (usefull) diverswatch, that I could wear on dry land. That's all I need (i probably couldn't part with more than $1500) (and regarding design, I like Signes watch more than Paelos') I had to look up those Oakley's. I'm kind of surprised that all of them (at least the analog ones) are only suitable for shallow water. Even the "Torpedo" model. :roll: There's lots of watches suitable for diving though, but most of them seem to be in that Swiss style that you might not like (?). Title: Re: Watches Post by: penfold on July 22, 2005, 05:49:03 AM The Seamaster Pro (as worn by Bond) is the sailors version of the Speedmaster Pro and rated to 300m/1000ft.
http://home.xnet.com/~cmaddox/mlsemp.html The Speedmaster Pro is rated to 30m. The Speedmaster Pro is so cool, next time you watch NASA doing EVAs, check out the Speedmaster with velcro strap... on the outside of the space suit. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 22, 2005, 06:54:48 AM I had been buying Righ Oakley sunglasses for years and had no idea they sold watches. Neither one of us are watch people but sometimes he could use one for work and I have no idea what I did with the one he used to have. (it may have accidentally fallen in the toilet, accidentally by mistake) Anyway, I've given up and he just goes watchless. Sometimes he's late but it generally doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Yegolev on July 22, 2005, 07:59:28 AM I am in the watchless camp. I need to know what time it is when I am working, and I have several sources for precise time, such as my laptop and every AIX server on our network. When I am not working, your Earth time codes are irrelevant to me. If it does come up, though, my shitty Blackberry has a reasonable grasp of what the local time is.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Sky on July 22, 2005, 08:27:27 AM I'm also watchless. I hate constrictions, don't wear necklaces, rings, anything. Hell, if public nudity were acceptable, that'd be me. No cell phones, pagers. I'm a luddite, which is kinda funny for a sysadmin, I guess.
The kicker is that I'm always on time and my girl is always late, despite her wearing a watch. Title: Re: Watches Post by: HaemishM on July 22, 2005, 08:33:16 AM (http://www.tokyoflash.com/pics/CYP001_L1.jpg) How the fuck do you tell time with that pretentious, Ipod-fruity-skinny-tie-designer-fag-jagoff piece of shit? I spent $10 on a watch at Target, with velcro and digital numbers. It tells time. I'm late anyway. Why the fuck would you spend more money than the cost of a Gamecube on a portable armclock? Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 22, 2005, 08:37:50 AM I'm with you, Sky. I only wear my wedding ring, no other jewelry, despite having several holes in my ears. Righ only needs a watch or something when he has a contract or job that requires lots of meetings, hence watches being lost around here. He's pretty good at getting around the need for one, anyway, in exactly the same way Sky is. I don't use a cell phone and his is only used for work... our T-Mobile bill comes to $23 nearly every month. I used to be big on jewerly, pierced bits and bobs, etc... it's only in the last 8-10 years I became semi-Luddite. I feel much better now... watches, jewelry, cell phones and the like are too stressy for me. Half those watches wouldn't do me any good either... I can't tell what they're trying to say to me.
On the other hand, expensive fast cars, cutting edge toys, top of the line hi-fi equipment and that sort of thing calms me right down. :-) I need more of it! Title: Re: Watches Post by: schild on July 22, 2005, 08:40:30 AM How the fuck do you tell time with that pretentious, Ipod-fruity-skinny-tie-designer-fag-jagoff piece of shit? I spent $10 on a watch at Target, with velcro and digital numbers. It tells time. I'm late anyway. Why the fuck would you spend more money than the cost of a Gamecube on a portable armclock? Hey now, just because gamecubes are underpriced because they are underloved doesn't mean you have to drag them into it. Everyone knows you'd love that watch. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Yegolev on July 22, 2005, 08:42:16 AM I'm a luddite, which is kinda funny for a sysadmin, I guess. It's only funny to people who don't wrangle computers for a living. I wrangle some relatively well-behaved beasts, and I really have come to appreciate a low Batman factor. Currently I have a "one". I hate this Blackberry so much, but I really don't want to get a cell phone. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Paelos on July 22, 2005, 09:02:53 AM I'm also watchless. I hate constrictions, don't wear necklaces, rings, anything. Hell, if public nudity were acceptable, that'd be me. No cell phones, pagers. I'm a luddite, which is kinda funny for a sysadmin, I guess. The kicker is that I'm always on time and my girl is always late, despite her wearing a watch. Sky sometimes when you post I just wanna go, DUUUUUUDE! :rock: Title: Re: Watches Post by: Sky on July 22, 2005, 10:28:44 AM Well, people love or hate me :| Usually the latter, but hey.
Quote from: Signe pierced bits and bobs pixplzkthxplz to not pk me irl righ Title: Re: Watches Post by: Merusk on July 22, 2005, 10:39:57 AM I wear a watch because I'm not always in front of a computer. Going to lunch or out in the field = I need to know the time. Even then, the 6-year-old fossil watch I got as a graduation present serves far, far better than one of those artsy too-damn-expensive pieces of aluminum. Phooey on shiney for shiney's sake.
I also refuse to own a cell phone or pager, because if you need to get ahold of me that fucking badly your arm better be off or a house better be collapsing.. in which case why didn't you call me at the office in the first place. As far as jewelery, I've got the wedding ring and a necklace I was given as a valentine's present 10 years ago. That's it. Wow, I'd be like the most boring rich guy, ever. I blame the Scottiish part of my heritage... the part that makes me say "Don't throw away that aluminum foil, damnit. Straighten it out and re-wrap the leftovers in it!" Title: Re: Watches Post by: voodoolily on July 22, 2005, 10:49:59 AM (http://a712.g.akamai.net/7/712/225/1h/www.espnshop.com/images/products/large/50095907_l.jpg)
This is the wristband/watch that I got from my Nike-employee friends for my b-day. To be rebellious, I put the clock in upside-down so there's an inverted swoosh. :rock: Edit: typo Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 22, 2005, 10:51:03 AM Well, people love or hate me :| Usually the latter, but hey. Quote from: Signe pierced bits and bobs pixplzkthxplz to not pk me irl righ Bits and bobs not tits and boobs. You wacky perv, you. Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 22, 2005, 10:52:38 AM 1 earring, 3 rings, a necklace, a bracelet, a watch, and no cell phones. I also like funny hats.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 22, 2005, 10:57:33 AM I love silly hats! The sillier, the betterer. er.
(http://www.productsofnepal.com/pImage/ca12.gif) I would wear this... oh yes. Title: Re: Watches Post by: penfold on July 22, 2005, 11:20:11 AM A good watch is an investment, or an heirloom to pass on. If i spend 1500 on watch, the odds are I will be wearing it when i retire. If I spend 1500 on a plasma tv, car or PC I certainly wont be using it in 50 years time. A quality watch is not a disposable item.
Bear in mind both watches i linked are expensive due to their build and complexity. My preference will always be for steel, not precious metals, although gold etc are available. You pay for quality, not because they are dripping in diamonds and jewels. Chronoswiss are handmade, the craftsmanship is absolutely exquisite, and one of a limited amount made each year. Mechanical perfection. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Viin on July 22, 2005, 12:46:16 PM Check out the watches by Breitling (http://www.breitling.com) - their site is really slick too. I currently wear a simple Swiss Army analog watch with nothing but the current day of the month. But what I really want this:
(http://www.blitzwatches.co.uk/images/620.121.jpg) Or one of their cool Emergency Mission watches (http://www.breitling.com/en/models/professional/emergency_mission/) that includes a pull-out antenna that transmits to location-finding radios in case you get lost. (Not really helpful unless you tend to get lost a lot or (like me) fly over mountains in small airplanes). Title: Re: Watches Post by: NowhereMan on July 22, 2005, 01:01:36 PM See I want to get me a good watch sometime. Seeing as my dad lives out in Beijing I've been wearing cheap Chinese rip-offs of decent watches for the last few years and just got sick of watches dying on me. I like to know what the time is just because, I don't (usually) have a great need to know exactly what time it is but it's nice to know, say, how close it is to the last Tube home if I'm out with friends. I have a mobile that can serve this function but I dislike always taking it out when I want to know the time. I also feel it just invites a mugging doing that too often in London.
However being a poor college student I don't think I'm going to be affording any of those Omegas or Breightlings any time soon, have to make do with something cheaper but hopefully not tackier. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Abagadro on July 22, 2005, 01:13:09 PM I'm still wearing my Seiko four-dial, moon-phase chronograph that I got 15 years ago. I love the style and they don't really make them any more. I need to send it to Seiko to get refurbished one of these days.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 22, 2005, 01:16:17 PM However being a poor college student I don't think I'm going to be affording any of those Omegas or Breightlings any time soon, have to make do with something cheaper but hopefully not tackier. ESQ (Movado's cheaper line), or things from the big designer brands like Kenneth Cole fit the bill. Title: Re: Watches Post by: NowhereMan on July 22, 2005, 03:09:53 PM I'll have a look into some of these, thanks.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: penfold on July 22, 2005, 03:34:07 PM You can also look into the used watch market.
Some older watches from less well known watchmakers are affordable, and definetly original. The amount of research and study needed to go into online auctions to avoid fakes isnt worth it imho so keep to reputable sellers. Some interesting ex-military stuff here (http://www.chronomaster.co.uk/vintage_military_watches.htm) Title: Re: Watches Post by: Paelos on July 22, 2005, 04:19:10 PM I agree about the used watches. Used Rolex watches in particular if you can find a reputable middle man.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 22, 2005, 04:30:00 PM Here's a used Rolex (http://store.yahoo.com/gotyourwatch/menrolpreswa.html) for $89,250. Damn.
Seriously though, I doubt you can find any good Rolex watches in the price range he's talking about. Cartier > Rolex anyhow. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 22, 2005, 05:07:06 PM Righ didn't buy me this for my unB-Day:
(http://www.ciprianijewelry.com/images/full/watches/6.jpg) But he did send me a bloody finger unB-Day greeting. (I was feeling left out) Title: Re: Watches Post by: penfold on July 22, 2005, 05:15:35 PM Oh if we are talking silly money lets jump to the end with Patek Phillipes The Supercomplication (http://www.patekmuseum.com/EN/theWatch.asp?id=24&themeId=3&floorId=First) created in a competiton between millionaires Henry Graves Jr and James Ward Packard over who, bascially, had the l33test watch.
$11,000,000 in Sothebys to an anonymous collector. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Strazos on July 22, 2005, 09:35:56 PM ESQ (Movado's cheaper line), or things from the big designer brands like Kenneth Cole fit the bill. The K. Cole I bought for my Europe trip (when my fake TAG died) was replaced by my Swatch. I love my Swatch, though the Kenneth Cole didn't look Bad, per se. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Strazos on July 22, 2005, 09:44:55 PM Oh if we are talking silly money lets jump to the end with Patek Phillipes The Supercomplication (http://www.patekmuseum.com/EN/theWatch.asp?id=24&themeId=3&floorId=First) created in a competiton between millionaires Henry Graves Jr and James Ward Packard over who, bascially, had the l33test watch. $11,000,000 in Sothebys to an anonymous collector. Are you shitting me? Just from looking at it, it does the time, date, day of the week, phase of the moon, and orientation of the constellations. It probably cooks your dinner too. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Hanzii on July 23, 2005, 03:05:38 PM See, here's the problem.
I don't wear a watch because I hate jewelry. I brought home rhe fucking diamond in my wifes wedding band from South Africa myself, just so that she would accept, that she'd be the only one to wear one (not as much accept as take her mind of...). I love gadgets, though. I never go out without at least one mobile phone (which I buy a new of at least once a year). Usually I carry a mobile, a MP3-player and my PSP... sometimes a PDA too. So I don't mind to carry stuff. I need a diving watch (for diving, d'uh). So if I could find a cool looking diving watch, I'd actually wear it. I asked you guys to help me find a cool diving watch... and you all post pretty pictures of fuckin' jewelry?! What's wrong with you? I can forgive Signe. She's a girl and they don't seem to grasp the concept of too many diamonds at all... but the one Penfold posted? Title: Re: Watches Post by: NiX on July 23, 2005, 03:21:40 PM Tis a good watch, but I'm getting one of the following 3: <pictures of gay removed> Stop being such a whore for stupid nonsensical japanese shit. Here's my watch: (http://www.mercadolibre.com.mx/org-img/preview/MLM/032005/8025077_1536.jpg) I paid 20 bucks for this. Title: Re: Watches Post by: stray on July 23, 2005, 03:26:32 PM See, here's the problem. I don't wear a watch because I hate jewelry. I brought home rhe fucking diamond in my wifes wedding band from South Africa myself, just so that she would accept, that she'd be the only one to wear one (not as much accept as take her mind of...). I love gadgets, though. I never go out without at least one mobile phone (which I buy a new of at least once a year). Usually I carry a mobile, a MP3-player and my PSP... sometimes a PDA too. So I don't mind to carry stuff. I need a diving watch (for diving, d'uh). So if I could find a cool looking diving watch, I'd actually wear it. I asked you guys to help me find a cool diving watch... and you all post pretty pictures of fuckin' jewelry?! What's wrong with you? I can forgive Signe. She's a girl and they don't seem to grasp the concept of too many diamonds at all... but the one Penfold posted? I don't think I'm guilty of posting jewelry here.....But like I said, those Oakley's are only suitable for shallow water. Most, if not all, diving watches are Swiss styled. That is, at least analog ones are. Since you mentioned that you wanted something you could wear on land every once in a while too, I assumed you meant something fairly presentable. Even Navy Seal type watches fall under this category. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Samprimary on July 24, 2005, 02:43:15 AM I have two watches. One's complicated and expensive. One's pragmatic and .. uh, expensive.
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y123/samprimary/Casio_Pathfinder_PAT401L_3V_Outdoor.jpg) This is a Casio Pathfinder and I wear it when doing the whole outdoorsy-type-thing. Barometer, temperature gague, altimeter, with measuring bars for measurements over time, and a super convenient triple-sensor compass which is why I got the thing in the first place. Plus it's got other features, like telling time. (http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y123/samprimary/ti5010.jpg) This is the closest I could find to the particular watch that I wear most of the time. It's made out of titanium, which is stronger and about 40% lighter than stainless steel, so it works well for watches. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Signe on July 24, 2005, 06:39:31 AM Yeah, that top one is the kind I said I hate... because it's so big. I didn't know they had so many uses. I thought people just wore them to annoy me. I should give people the benefit of a doubt more often. Unless they're at the mall. There is NO reason for a watch like that at the mall! Dammit.
Title: Re: Watches Post by: ClydeJr on July 25, 2005, 08:13:38 AM (http://ww2.tagheuer.com/_images/big/WK2116_BA0311_b.jpg)
This is the watch Mrs. ClydeJr got for me as a wedding gift. I wanted a nice watch that had a good solid feel. Has enough bulk to it to feel right but not overly bulky. I didn't want something with all the funky dials, just something sleek and purty. I always have to wear a watch. I feel unbalanced as if my right arm isn't heavy enought (I'm left handed so I wear watches on my right hand). Same thing if I'm not wearing my wedding ring or Aggie ring. I need the weight to feel right. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Murgos on July 25, 2005, 08:35:39 AM My everyday wear to work watch. It's about 9 years old now.
(http://www.swissarmy.com/webstore/images/watches/24205.jpg) Title: Re: Watches Post by: Fargull on July 25, 2005, 09:12:43 AM Here's my watch: I paid 20 bucks for this. Same damn watch here, though I paid $25.00. I have not worn a watch for almost 12 years now. Hate the damn things. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Polysorbate80 on July 25, 2005, 09:48:48 AM I'm also watchless. I hate constrictions, don't wear necklaces, rings, anything.... No cell phones, pagers. I'm a luddite, which is kinda funny for a sysadmin, I guess.. I'm sort of the same way, with the odd exception that I'm a die-hard clock-watcher. Gotta know what time it is, even if it's totally pointless. Dunno why. My taste in watche is pretty simple though. I want to be able to look at it and instantly tell the time, without squinting through a lot of dials, or guessing what numbers the hands are supposed to be pointing at (watches with no markings irritate me) and those watches in this thread with wierd-ass LED displays and shit? That ain't a watch, it's decoration. The closest I get to pretty-fying my watch is maybe a cartoon character (ah, Marvin the Martian, how I shall miss thee--too bad someone drove over you, alas). Or my current watch: (http://www.fossil.com/images/us/local/products/thumb/AM3846.gif) It only changes from blue to green (whoopie and all) but my two-year old loves it. Hell, she picked it out when my wife bought it for me. The wife, on the other hand, cannot wear a watch. She has some kind of eeeee-vil aura or something that kills watches dead within a few days. It's eerie. Title: Re: Watches Post by: Samwise on July 25, 2005, 09:51:18 AM She has some kind of eeeee-vil aura or something that kills watches dead within a few days. It's eerie. Unusually iron-rich blood and very good circulation in her wrists? Title: Re: Watches Post by: Pococurante on July 25, 2005, 12:16:37 PM Since I stopped wearing watches I've been a happier person. I like not always knowing what time it is. Me too. Time is just annoying.Fourthed. A sundial has more precision than I can tolerate. |