f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Serious Business => Topic started by: Mrbloodworth on June 18, 2009, 12:15:16 PM



Title: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 18, 2009, 12:15:16 PM


Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist... (http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=011008&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=6093870&referralPlaylistId=playlist)

Fell asleep? REALLY?


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Lantyssa on June 18, 2009, 12:24:33 PM
Possible, but the artist's "her father got pissed" story seems more likely.  Or she got pissed and isn't mentioning it since getting a tattoo while drunk probably wouldn't have gone over well either.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: 01101010 on June 18, 2009, 12:30:32 PM
I don't know... it looks kind of nice actually. And she could have quite a lucrative career at any one of the major amusement parks around the world. My question is, why the face? Thought that sorta tattoo was confined to the insane and the ex-con population (which are not really that distinct)?


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 18, 2009, 12:36:32 PM
I call bullshit. When I got tatted on my chest, and they approached the ribcage area, it was a while body reverberation. Now apply this to a skill. Yeah.

Second, I very seriously doubt that any professional tattoo artiest working in a studio is going to "just do a few more" considering how most are paid. That shit ain't free. If he was just some guy, and did not work at a parlor, then WTF was she expecting?


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Brogarn on June 18, 2009, 12:50:21 PM
Ya, I'm thinking she got what she asked for and then later realized it wasn't what she thought it would look like. Or someone made fun of her. Or whatever else caused her to regret her decision.



Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: gryeyes on June 18, 2009, 12:56:15 PM
Why would a tattoo artist do 12 times the work for the same price? Falling asleep during a face tattoo that was supposed to take 10-15 minutes.  :uhrr: She got a retarded tattoo while probably high on crack her parents/bf were horrified so she makes up a stupid story.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Sky on June 18, 2009, 01:34:23 PM
That woman has a gavel coming out of her cleavage!

(http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/6333/picture1ytk.png)

STOP!

TITTY HAMMER TIME!

I couldn't make it past the opening statements of the stuptarded panel on the clip. What a bunch of raging douches, I really need to get into that line of work once I get better at keeping a straight face while spewing forth garbage.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 18, 2009, 03:01:03 PM
Dude. Fox News.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Hawkbit on June 18, 2009, 03:23:49 PM
I've got ink in weird spots, but I've never once fallen asleep during them. 

His work looked like shit, too.  Half those stars were really crusty.  Looked like he damaged the dermis more than he needed to.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Lantyssa on June 18, 2009, 03:32:32 PM
Second, I very seriously doubt that any professional tattoo artiest working in a studio is going to "just do a few more" considering how most are paid. That shit ain't free. If he was just some guy, and did not work at a parlor, then WTF was she expecting?
Depends on the artist.  One of my friends was getting a pretty simple grim reaper done but the guy really got into it and did some very intricate cross-hatched shading and other touches.  Though he still only did it with permission and did tell him explicitly to not worry about the extra time as it was on him.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Cadaverine on June 18, 2009, 05:35:44 PM
Gonna have to go with bullshit regret story on this one.  While the tats I've gotten weren't super painful, there's no fucking way I'm sleeping through it.  Hell, I'd have liked to have gone to sleep for the last one, as I was pretty fucking tired.

Getting tattooed right over your eye?  Shit no, she wasn't asleep.  She's just stupid, and from the looks of it, chose a shitty artist, or the dude did a shitty job because she was being a douche.

For reference, my latest tattoo

And the original picture, by Bruce Timm


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: IainC on June 18, 2009, 05:42:10 PM
Gonna have to go with bullshit regret story on this one.  While the tats I've gotten weren't super painful, there's no fucking way I'm sleeping through it.  Hell, I'd have liked to have gone to sleep for the last one, as I was pretty fucking tired.

Getting tattooed right over your eye?  Shit no, she wasn't asleep.  She's just stupid, and from the looks of it, chose a shitty artist, or the dude did a shitty job because she was being a douche.

For reference, my latest tattoo

And the original picture, by Bruce Timm


That's some nasty carpet. Just saying.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Paelos on June 18, 2009, 05:54:12 PM
Get Big Gulp in here to call bullshit on this. Doesn't he ink tattoos?


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Evildrider on June 18, 2009, 06:30:38 PM
I've gotten some ink on both my arms and chest.

And if she slept through that whole thing then I'm fucking Jessica Alba.

She was either drunk and stupid, stoned and stupid, or popping vicadin and some sleeping pills.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Grimwell on June 18, 2009, 06:34:12 PM
It's bullshit and the only part I don't understand (I can accept a kid doing something stupid and telling lies to their parents) is the media picking this up and making a story out of it.

She chose a stupid tattoo and instead of having something awesome (chicks with ink are hot) she went for some stars that make the golden arches if you look at them the right way.

Unless she goes into pron this is just a bad decision on many levels for her.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Broughden on June 18, 2009, 11:51:42 PM
I want to have sechs with the blonde TV woman MILF.
Who gives a shit about some white trash girl and her ugly tattooed mug?

If you find nude photos or a celebrity sex tape of the hostess let me know.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: lac on June 19, 2009, 12:48:57 AM
That story triggered a debate about changing the legislation surrounding tattoo's here. They are debating a mandatory two day waiting period for tattoos done to hands or the face and a signed contract describing the design and placement in detail before any tattooing is done.

The French guy who did the tattoo (picture below) is getting some flack from the tattoo artist community because few artists will do such large facial work so readily on young people due to the life long consequences.

  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Broughden on June 19, 2009, 01:07:48 AM
Well he looks like a perfectly well adjusted normal young man.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Tale on June 19, 2009, 02:19:31 AM
It's bullshit and the only part I don't understand (I can accept a kid doing something stupid and telling lies to their parents) is the media picking this up and making a story out of it.

Here is why the media picked up on this and made a story out of it: You clicked on it. CLICKS = MONEY. People making message board threads to discuss stupid stories = MONEY. All the people reading the thread click on the story. They go and make threads on other message boards. People email it to their tattooed friends, who click on it. It snowballs into a gargantuan clickfest.

The more you click, the more money Rupert Murdoch makes. So online news editors like me are paid to find more stories like this.

Read up on CPM/CPI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_per_mille http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_Per_Impression

Get it? The advertiser pays a rate per 1000 clicks on the page where their ad is shown to people. That is, they pay for clicks on the story, not clicks on the ad.

Most high-traffic sites sell ad space using CPM, not just the news media. But it just so happens that sensationalised news stories are one of the things people will click on most. A story like this will generate more clicks on its own than an entire website full of good, honest, worthy news. Because people don't click as much on the worthy stuff.

The stupidest thing is the people who discuss the poor journalism ON THE STORY PAGE ITSELF. They debate it for days, posting comment after comment, refreshing to read other people's comments, i.e. c l i c k i n g.

Controversy makes clicks. Dubious stories make clicks. The best thing is, you run a shitty story like this, then the real facts come out a few days later and all the people who clicked on the original shitty story return for the real story, maybe taking a look at the original story again, i.e. c l i c k i n g.

Other online media outlets pick it up as an attributed rewrite, milking it for clicks from their own readers. Commercial TV networks pick it up because it makes people watch (freaky pictures), and for them it's similar: eyeballs on the ads. Newspapers and magazines do it too.

Everything works the same as my "Recruiter told not to hire WoW players" thread.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: lac on June 19, 2009, 07:43:01 AM
She's sooooo web-famous! You can now Kimberlize  (http://nl.netlog.com/kimberlizer)yourself if you have a webcam. I'm sure T-shirts are coming right up.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 19, 2009, 07:51:25 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/8712/kimberlized.jpg)


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Grimwell on June 19, 2009, 10:55:47 AM
All kinds of good points...
Hrm,

You are right. I'm going to see if I can resist the urge to click stupid 'news' stories that I am emailed, etc. so I don't feed that system. Any time I find a good one that I just have to share, I'm going to full quote the story and save people the link. It's fun for a few seconds to laugh at stupid -- but feeding the system that encourages it isn't worth the yuks.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Gutboy Barrelhouse on June 19, 2009, 05:16:03 PM
I would only be impressed if the tat artist got both eyes pierced.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Cadaverine on June 19, 2009, 07:08:41 PM
After seeing someone get their eyeball tattooed, I've gotta say, they're both a couple of pussies.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: penfold on June 21, 2009, 02:28:24 AM
Rouslan Toumaniantz, former guard at Jabba's palace and Mos Eisley resident.

Fixed.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Tale on June 23, 2009, 12:44:02 AM
The stupidest thing is the people who discuss the poor journalism ON THE STORY PAGE ITSELF. They debate it for days, posting comment after comment, refreshing to read other people's comments, i.e. c l i c k i n g.

Controversy makes clicks. Dubious stories make clicks. The best thing is, you run a shitty story like this, then the real facts come out a few days later and all the people who clicked on the original shitty story return for the real story, maybe taking a look at the original story again, i.e. c l i c k i n g.

The real facts are out, and exactly what I described is now happening: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25676214-401,00.html

Take a look at the anatomy of that news page. You've got a video to watch, earlier stories to read, and 200+ comments to read and respond to. Most of which are along the lines of "why did the media even cover this?". None of these people realise they are answering their own question :)


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: lac on June 23, 2009, 01:13:41 AM
Oh, but this isn't over yet. Everybody involved is doing their utmost to generate as much follow-up stories as possible. At least these people are doing their best to jumpstart the economy, one pageview at a time.
On saturday, her dad, uncle, mom's latest boyfriend rearranged the tattoo shop and threatened to tear the tattoo artist a new one if he didn't pay for the removal of said tattoo (10k-15k € if you want it done right).
On sunday she gave a couple of interviews admitting she changed her mind after her dad, uncle, mom's latest boyfriend freaked out when he saw her new tattoo.
On monday her lawyer told her to STFU but it was too late and the tattoo artist (who isn't flattered by sunlight, see below) will sue for damages and slander This morning, the tattoo shop across the street of where she got her 56 stars announced Kimberley will be giving a workshop on Friday on the dangers of choosing the wrong kind of tattoo for you. I shit you not.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Tale on June 23, 2009, 02:07:34 AM
Courtesy of Twitter: http://imgur.com/gQouk.jpg


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: lac on June 23, 2009, 02:25:07 AM
It sure makes me appreciate firefox & addblock. I had to reload the news.au story in internet explorer to check out the adds on the page.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: K9 on June 23, 2009, 09:39:07 AM
Everyone loves drama


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Sheepherder on June 23, 2009, 12:39:13 PM
(who isn't flattered by sunlight, see below)

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/08/Schreck.jpg)


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: tazelbain on June 23, 2009, 01:18:48 PM
I don't see it here so I'll let you guys know.  In shocking turn of events that nobody saw coming, Starchild has recanted.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Tale on June 23, 2009, 01:57:13 PM
I don't see it here so I'll you guys know.  In shocking turn of events that nobody saw coming, Starchild has recanted.

The real facts are out, and exactly what I described is now happening: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25676214-401,00.html

I sneakily hid it in media criticism.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Sky on June 23, 2009, 02:48:42 PM
I don't see it here so I'll you guys know.  In shocking turn of events that nobody saw coming, Starchild has recanted.
(http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/1707/kissphantom2.jpg)


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Lantyssa on June 23, 2009, 08:01:51 PM
I sneakily hid it in media criticism.
With only the link instead of additionally quoting the text so we had to go read it for the latest.  In an ironic twist, I never fell for the very trap you laid out until your own link. :-P


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Chimpy on June 24, 2009, 07:30:38 PM
Am I the only one disturbed by Daffy fapping it to Kiss Meets the Phantom of the Park?


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Sky on June 25, 2009, 08:07:11 AM
I thought the modern Mr Loaf with his hand on that young chick's titty was much more disturbing to fap to.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Lantyssa on June 25, 2009, 10:04:44 AM
I'm immune to it now.  At least it was amusing for a short bit.


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Sky on June 25, 2009, 10:35:08 AM
At least it was amusing for a short bit.
:awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: voodoolily on June 25, 2009, 12:30:16 PM
What I want to know is why the fuck is Bloodworth watching Fox News?


Title: Re: Teen sues trigger-happy tattoo artist
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 25, 2009, 02:56:53 PM
What I want to know is why the fuck is Bloodworth watching Fox News?

Someone linked me to it.