Title: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Morfiend on November 17, 2008, 04:22:24 PM So, it seems a whole bunch of people on my server where using some sort of exploit to level really fast. I think it had to do with one of the instances but I am not sure. I didnt ask for details. Anyway, it seems that Blizzard is aware of the problem and taking steps.
Quite a lot of people got a 3 day ban on Thursday and Friday. One guild that did it very heavily had 80% of their members banned, and even had their levels rolled back to 70. It remains to been seen if ever one who got banned will be rolled back or not. Good job Blizz. /clap Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: K9 on November 17, 2008, 04:35:24 PM I think it works something like:
1) Enter instance with group 2) Leave group 3) Tag as many mobs as possible, group AoEs them down and heals you 4) Rejoin group before the 1-min kick timer hits zero 5) Goto 1 Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 17, 2008, 05:06:12 PM The best part about all this, is people were doing that to get the "Server's First 80 <class>" achievements.
Too bad for them :grin: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Kail on November 17, 2008, 05:50:25 PM I think it works something like: 1) Enter instance with group 2) Leave group 3) Tag as many mobs as possible, group AoEs them down and heals you 4) Rejoin group before the 1-min kick timer hits zero 5) Goto 1 Is that seriously a bannable exploit? I thought people had been doing that for years. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 17, 2008, 06:35:31 PM I think it works something like: 1) Enter instance with group 2) Leave group 3) Tag as many mobs as possible, group AoEs them down and heals you 4) Rejoin group before the 1-min kick timer hits zero 5) Goto 1 Is that seriously a bannable exploit? I thought people had been doing that for years. They've been banned for that for years too, its just big news because of the new achievements. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Venkman on November 17, 2008, 06:38:21 PM Apparently this was fixed years ago but then unfixed in beta without having been refixed. And a whole bunch of people realized that.
What they DIDN'T realize was that Blizzard didn't also unfix their datamonitoring tools :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Brolan on November 17, 2008, 07:37:48 PM Apparently this was fixed years ago but then unfixed in beta without having been refixed. And a whole bunch of people realized that. What they DIDN'T realize was that Blizzard didn't also unfix their datamonitoring tools :awesome_for_real: I thought it was common knowledge that MMO devs watch the extreme performers for evidence of exploits? That's the easiest way to find them. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: tissa on November 17, 2008, 07:58:18 PM So, it seems a whole bunch of people on my server where using some sort of exploit to level really fast. I think it had to do with one of the instances but I am not sure. I didnt ask for details. Anyway, it seems that Blizzard is aware of the problem and taking steps. Quite a lot of people got a 3 day ban on Thursday and Friday. One guild that did it very heavily had 80% of their members banned, and even had their levels rolled back to 70. It remains to been seen if ever one who got banned will be rolled back or not. Good job Blizz. /clap Yeah from all signs they were exploiting instances and their timers. Personally I detest people that are so poor of players that they are willing to cheat hack and exploit to be the best, because to me that is not the Best... the best can do it with in the rules. :mob: I give props to the guild and players that bust their balls to get to the top and be server first when they do it the old fashion way... I just laughed my ass off when the qq's about this hit the forum. All the QQ'ers, but it is not fair to ban for this... we didn't do anything that the game didn't allow us to do. *giggles* Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Cheddar on November 17, 2008, 08:58:18 PM Yeah from all signs they were exploiting instances and their timers. Personally I detest people that are so poor of players that they are willing to cheat hack and exploit to be the best, because to me that is not the Best... the best can do it with in the rules. :mob: I give props to the guild and players that bust their balls to get to the top and be server first when they do it the old fashion way... I just laughed my ass off when the qq's about this hit the forum. All the QQ'ers, but it is not fair to ban for this... we didn't do anything that the game didn't allow us to do. *giggles* Who the fuck are you? Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: WindupAtheist on November 17, 2008, 09:04:30 PM On one hand, do we really have to ritually murder every newbie who wanders in here? On the other hand they did use "QQ" without irony, so I don't know.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Xerapis on November 17, 2008, 09:27:11 PM On the other hand, they DID giggle, so I have to give them +1 gay point for that :drillf:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Ragnoros on November 17, 2008, 09:30:14 PM Welcomed by Cheddar and WUA. :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Lantyssa on November 17, 2008, 10:49:42 PM On the other hand, they DID giggle, so I have to give them +1 gay point for that :drillf: If the name is any indicator, I don't think your point award is valid.*giggle* See? No point for me. :cry: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 17, 2008, 10:57:35 PM And :mob: is such an appropriate emoticon for the f13 welcoming committee :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Xerapis on November 17, 2008, 11:03:38 PM Yeah, but if I judged by name or avatar, I'd have gotten a lot of y'alls genders/orientations/etc wrong :drillf:
We'll make it a probationary gay point for "tissa" And +1 adorable red panda point for Lantyssa and NO, dear newbies, we don't actually have a point system here...this is a disclaimer so Schild doesn't smite me Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Wasted on November 17, 2008, 11:05:37 PM Is this is the same tactic that Athene used to make his powerleveling record?
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Yoshimaru on November 18, 2008, 12:13:56 AM Yep, and the same one that got him banned and reset to 70.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: tissa on November 18, 2008, 04:31:12 AM Who the fuck are you? I am Tissa or would you prefer a full bio? Either way thanks for the welcome. =) Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Koyasha on November 18, 2008, 05:29:41 AM I don't understand this. Do instance mobs somehow behave differently than outdoor mobs in their exp distribution when tagged by one person but mostly killed by others? Cause typically if this happens, the person who tagged gets to loot, and a little exp, but it's a tiny percentage of what they normally get.
Also, banning for this is bloody retarded. This PLing tactic has been around since forever. Back in EQ it was having one person fire off an AE to do at least one point of damage to all mobs, then allow them to suicide on a damage shield. City of Mist was great for this since the skeletons didn't run, and they didn't have a standard agro table, they just hit whatever was closest. Banning for exploitation of bugs, such as duping or mobs that don't fight back or whatever is one thing. Banning for figuring out the most effective way to use exp allocation mechanics to funnel exp to one player is retarded. The mobs aren't being killed via an exploit, and everyone involved is willingly giving up the exp they would be gaining to the player being powerleveled. No one is taking advantage of anyone. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Dewdrop on November 18, 2008, 06:06:43 AM I don't understand this. Do instance mobs somehow behave differently than outdoor mobs in their exp distribution when tagged by one person but mostly killed by others? Cause typically if this happens, the person who tagged gets to loot, and a little exp, but it's a tiny percentage of what they normally get. Elite mobs in instances grant more xp, but its usually shared amongst the 5 people. If you are the only person in the group, you get ALL the xp and you can do this repeatedly in certain instances that have weak hitting non-caster mobs. The tap on the mobs is assigned to the group, too, so the person getting powerleveled, afaik, doesn't even have to tap the mobs. They just need to be the leader of the group and, thus, the last person IN the group when it disbands to get the full hit of XP. It something like 3000+ xp/kill, and in an instance like Utgarge Keep you can kill them so fast it really adds up. Clear UK twice, get a level.. Disclaimer: I could be wrong on the mechanics, this is how I understood it to work based on what I've read recently. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Oban on November 18, 2008, 06:08:08 AM Do they get to keep their achievements for getting server firsts?
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nebu on November 18, 2008, 06:18:15 AM A 3 day ban is "FU"?
Give them a character and bank wipe. If you're not going to send a real message, don't bother. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Cheddar on November 18, 2008, 06:27:03 AM On one hand, do we really have to ritually murder every newbie who wanders in here? u r 2 cute. :why_so_serious: I am the champion of noobs, but come on. Giving props to catassery? QQ? Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nevermore on November 18, 2008, 06:40:36 AM Who the fuck are you? I am Tissa or would you prefer a full bio? Either way thanks for the welcome. =) No you aren't. You're tissa. You couldn't be arsed to use the shift key when coming up with a forum name. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Reg on November 18, 2008, 07:04:22 AM I didn't think our stringent capitalization standards applied to forum names. I imagine this comes as a surprise to apocrypha as well.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: UnSub on November 18, 2008, 07:08:43 AM I didn't think our stringent capitalization standards applied to forum names. I imagine this comes as a surprise to apocrypha as well. A lot of new sign-ups appeared unable to use the shift key on the first letter of their nic. That had a strong correlation with low quality first posts and ergo long-term survival. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Reg on November 18, 2008, 07:15:34 AM The capitalization in tissa's posts has been fine. The only place where it hasn't been done is in his/her forum name.
The instant hostility towards newcomers from some of the veteran posters here is a little much. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: kildorn on November 18, 2008, 07:16:06 AM Who the fuck are you? I am Tissa or would you prefer a full bio? Either way thanks for the welcome. =) No you aren't. You're tissa. You couldn't be arsed to use the shift key when coming up with a forum name. That hurts. :( Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nevermore on November 18, 2008, 07:18:59 AM The capitalization in tissa's posts has been fine. The only place where it hasn't been done is in his/her forum name. The instant hostility towards newcomers from some of the veteran posters here is a little much. Oh please. Ironwood hasn't even called this new person a cunt yet. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: NiX on November 18, 2008, 07:22:01 AM The instant hostility towards newcomers from some of the veteran posters here is a little much. Almost like being instantly kick/banned from IRC upon joining the channel. Just cause.Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Ironwood on November 18, 2008, 07:23:22 AM Actually, I'm with Reg. You're all a little hostile.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Oban on November 18, 2008, 07:35:31 AM Actually, I'm with Reg. You're all a little hostile. (http://www.clisham.com-a.googlepages.com/pig.jpg) Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 18, 2008, 08:10:29 AM No you aren't. You're tissa. You couldn't be arsed to use the shift key when coming up with a forum name. I deliberately left the first letter of my forum name lower case just because I like the look of the word like that.... is that more or less douchey than doing it out of laziness? :why_so_serious: edit: Where'd that ] go? Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Jayce on November 18, 2008, 08:21:44 AM :hello_thar:
It wasn't a particularly retarded first post. Lowercase nick has precedent. *giggles* is permissible depending on gender/orientation. Judgment for the defendant!! Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Rasix on November 18, 2008, 08:27:08 AM On one hand, do we really have to ritually murder every newbie who wanders in here? u r 2 cute. :why_so_serious: I am the champion of noobs, but come on. Giving props to catassery? QQ? Who the fuck are you? We've seen a lot worse in the very recent past. If you have a problem with what they said, respond to that rather than go with the "RAWRRR NEW MEAT" schtick. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: murdoc on November 18, 2008, 08:36:09 AM No you aren't. You're tissa. You couldn't be arsed to use the shift key when coming up with a forum name. [/quote] Awwww... crap. :cry: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Righ on November 18, 2008, 08:49:53 AM I didn't think our stringent capitalization standards applied to forum names. I imagine this comes as a surprise to apocrypha as well. A lot of new sign-ups appeared unable to use the shift key on the first letter of their nic. That had a strong correlation with low quality first posts and ergo long-term survival. Does anybody happen to have a copy of schild's first Waterthread post? Oh, and I'm with Nebu on this - permaban the exploiters or it's a bunch of flowers. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Reg on November 18, 2008, 08:52:47 AM Quote Does anybody happen to have a copy of schild's first Waterthread post? I bet it was great. He was a very advanced 12 year old after all. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Cheddar on November 18, 2008, 08:58:51 AM Who the fuck are you? We've seen a lot worse in the very recent past. If you have a problem with what they said, respond to that rather than go with the "RAWRRR NEW MEAT" schtick. Your right. tissa, I apologize. :geezer: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nebu on November 18, 2008, 09:02:58 AM Almost like being instantly kick/banned from IRC upon joining the channel. Just cause. Is this some sort of #hate reference? Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Signe on November 18, 2008, 09:23:45 AM (http://www.thecatarena.com/forum/images/smilies/kumbaya.gif)
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nevermore on November 18, 2008, 09:26:31 AM :hello_thar: It wasn't a particularly retarded first post. Lowercase nick has precedent. *giggles* is permissible depending on gender/orientation. Judgment for the defendant!! You're absolutely right. What was I thinking? I for one welcome our new shift key challenged, giggling overlords. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Lakov_Sanite on November 18, 2008, 09:46:40 AM =^.^=
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: WindupAtheist on November 18, 2008, 09:48:41 AM WHO THE FUCK ARE ANY OF YOU?!?!?!?
Cheddar, you can't talk after that horrible newb you brought in here from LOTRO or whatever, the one who was saying "hail" instead of "hello" and shit. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Merusk on November 18, 2008, 10:00:00 AM WHO THE FUCK ARE ANY OF YOU?!?!?!? I'm Batman. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Morfiend on November 18, 2008, 10:00:47 AM WHO THE FUCK ARE ANY OF YOU?!?!?!? Cheddar, you can't talk after that horrible newb you brought in here from LOTRO or whatever, the one who was saying "hail" instead of "hello" and shit. :oh_i_see: Since we are giving out completely imaginary points. +2 to WUA for the above. Also, +1 to the giggler, cause he/she's post was much better than any of the new person posts we have got recently. Hell, +5 to me for starting this amazing thread. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nevermore on November 18, 2008, 10:07:38 AM +10,000 points to Colin Mochrie, for being so lovably bald.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: sinij on November 18, 2008, 10:51:47 AM Seems I am late to "cannibalize our young" party. Can I have leftovers in the fridge?
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Signe on November 18, 2008, 11:01:49 AM We never get to eat anyone here, you know that. They get run off too fast. If we were nicer, the "what's in your fridge?" thread would be WAY more interesting. :vv:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Nebu on November 18, 2008, 11:04:19 AM R-U-N-N-O-F-T
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Morfiend on November 18, 2008, 11:34:44 AM R-U-N-N-O-F-T (http://sidesalad.net/archives/DelmarFromOBrotherWhereArtThou.jpg) Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Tarami on November 18, 2008, 12:33:03 PM Also, +1 to the giggler, cause he Too eager on the womanliness and giggles... :tinfoil:Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Paelos on November 18, 2008, 12:34:48 PM Blizzard made an error by putting in the "Realm First" achievements. It's a blank check for stupidity amongst your players. Of course they are going to cheat to get it when you put in a reward for speed.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Valmorian on November 18, 2008, 01:08:03 PM Blizzard made an error by putting in the "Realm First" achievements. It's a blank check for stupidity amongst your players. Of course they are going to cheat to get it when you put in a reward for speed. It's a clever ploy to find cheaters more easily.. and then BAN them!! :ye_gods: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Paelos on November 18, 2008, 01:57:38 PM Oh, and anybody who got a "Realm First!" when I'm on got instantly added to my ignore list. Damn poopsockers.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Morfiend on November 18, 2008, 03:11:48 PM My friend who works at Blizzard said to me: "those achievements are just an official badge for shitsack basement dwellers".
I laughed. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Calantus on November 18, 2008, 04:52:19 PM My brother got first dwarf and first warrior on our server. He now "feels like shit" and thinks he came down with the flu. I was not surprised.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: tissa on November 19, 2008, 12:44:38 AM Who the fuck are you? We've seen a lot worse in the very recent past. If you have a problem with what they said, respond to that rather than go with the "RAWRRR NEW MEAT" schtick. Your right. tissa, I apologize. :geezer: Hell no apologies necessary. I am a big girl and besides I thought it was funny as hell. It is a good way to keep out the dumb shits or at least find out who has very thin skin. Now as for the capitalization of my forum handle. Technically it should have had a ' in front of the tissa, since it is not the whole name. Also it can be seen as submissive in certain internet circles and not to mention it can drive some people nuts. I like to think that Blizzard put in the server first achievements in so they know which accounts to watch for "suspicious" activity or to find out who's life is centered around the game. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Azaroth on November 19, 2008, 01:28:35 AM So they know whose account to threaten cancellation against when they need a free blowjob?
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 19, 2008, 04:47:18 AM I like to think that Blizzard put in the server first achievements in so they know which accounts to watch for "suspicious" activity or to find out who's life is centered around the game. I think rewarding different playstyles is something Blizzard have really been working towards for a long time now with WoW, imo they've resolved a lot of the tension that used to exist in the hardcore vs casual debate. You can get enjoyment out of WoW however hardcore or however casual you are, and this specific achievement is a small dinggratsepeen reward for the hardcore. Of course having a handy marker of which accounts to check for exploiting is an added bonus but I'm sure they were able to track server firsts and abnormal leveling speeds etc before they put the achievement system in place :) Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: tissa on November 19, 2008, 05:57:38 AM I like to think that Blizzard put in the server first achievements in so they know which accounts to watch for "suspicious" activity or to find out who's life is centered around the game. I think rewarding different playstyles is something Blizzard have really been working towards for a long time now with WoW, imo they've resolved a lot of the tension that used to exist in the hardcore vs casual debate. You can get enjoyment out of WoW however hardcore or however casual you are, and this specific achievement is a small dinggratsepeen reward for the hardcore. Of course having a handy marker of which accounts to check for exploiting is an added bonus but I'm sure they were able to track server firsts and abnormal leveling speeds etc before they put the achievement system in place :) Yeah I will admit that I do like the achievements especially now that I am not raiding. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 19, 2008, 06:01:08 AM Yeah I will admit that I do like the achievements especially now that I am not raiding. Me too :) I think it's a great system - they mean nothing but they're really cool when you get them. My girlfriend was so pleased when she accidentally fell off the zeppelin and got an achievement for it :)) Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Numtini on November 19, 2008, 06:14:12 AM I'm actually very disappointed in the achievements. LOTRO and COX both give you titles for all of these, mostly amusing, and are one of my favorite parts of both games. When I first heard about the achievements, that's what I thought and was delighted, but achievements without titles or whatever are pretty pointless.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 19, 2008, 07:30:27 AM There's one (http://www.wowhead.com/?achievement=2188) that I know of that gives you a title...
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Merusk on November 19, 2008, 07:38:25 AM There's titles for several achievements. However, they are gound-out by doing several OTHER achievements first. For example, "The Hallowed" for doing all the requisite Hallow's End Achievement, "The Merry Maker" for the upcoming Winter's Veil holiday. There's also "The Explorer" if you clear the map on all 3 expansions, and "The Loremaster" if you do all of the quest completions for all the zones.
Yes, it's another grind.. err. "Retention mechanic" :grin: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Gobbeldygook on November 19, 2008, 07:44:39 AM I'm actually very disappointed in the achievements. LOTRO and COX both give you titles for all of these, mostly amusing, and are one of my favorite parts of both games. When I first heard about the achievements, that's what I thought and was delighted, but achievements without titles or whatever are pretty pointless. There are shitloads of achievements with rewards, including titles. Here's a list someone else made:General- * Higher Learning (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1956) -- The Schools of Arcane Magic - Mastery (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=43824) and Kirin Tor Familiar (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=44738) * Shop Smart, Shop Pet...Smart (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1250) -- Reeking Pet Carrier (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?spell=40990) * Twenty-Five Tabards (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1021) -- Tabard of the Achiever (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=40643) * Leading the Cavalry (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2143) -- Albino Drake (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=44178) Leeeeeeeeeeeeeroy! (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2188) -- Title: Jenkins Quests and Exploring- 3000 Quests Completed (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=978) -- Title Reward: The Seeker * The Loremaster (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1681)/The Loremaster (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1682) -- Reward: Title & Loremaster's Colors World Explorer (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=46) -- Title Reward: The Explorer * Explore Northrend (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=45) -- Tabard of the Explorer Non-arena PvP- 100000 Honorable Kills (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=870) -- Title Reward: Of the Horde or Of the Alliance Battlemaster (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=230)/Battlemaster (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1175) -- Title Reward: Battlemaster * For The Alliance! (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=614)/For The Horde! (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=619) -- Black War Bear (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=44224) The Justicar (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=907)/The Conqueror (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=714) -- Title Reward: Justicar or Conqueror Arenas- * Brutally Dedicated (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=876) -- Tabard of Brute Force Hot Hot Hot Streak (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1163) -- Title Reward: The Flawless Victor The Arena Master (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1174) -- Title Reward: Arena Master Dungeons and Raiding- Champion of the Frozen Wastes (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1658) -- Title Reward: Champion of the Frozen Wastes * Glory of the Hero (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2136) -- Red Proto-Drake (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?spell=59961) * Glory of the Raider (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2137) -- Plagued Proto-Drake (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?spell=60021) * Heroic: Glory of the Raider (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2138) -- Black Proto-Drake (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?spell=59976) The Undying (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2187) -- Title Reward: The Undying The Twilight Zone (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2051) -- Title Reward: Of the Nightfall The Immortal (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2186) -- Title Reward: The Immortal Heroic: The Twilight Zone (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2054) -- Title Reward: Twilight Vanquisher Professions- Hail to the Chef (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1563) -- Title Reward: Chef * The Coin Master (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2096) -- Titanium Seal of Dalaran (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=44430) Accomplished Angler (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1516) -- Title Reward: Salty Reputations- 40 Exalted Reputations (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1015) -- Title Reward: The Exalted Ambassador of the Alliance (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=948) -- Title Reward: Ambassador Guardian of Cenarius (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=953) -- Title Reward: Guardian of Cenarius The Argent Champion (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=945) -- Title Reward: The Argent Champion The Diplomat (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=942) -- Title Reward: The Diplomat World Events- Brewmaster (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1684)/Brewmaster (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1683) -- Title Reward: Brewmaster Fool For Love (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1707)/Fool For Love (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1693) -- Title Reward: The Love Fool For The Children (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1793) -- Title Reward: Matron/Patron Hallowed Be Thy Name (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1656)/Hallowed Be Thy Name (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1657) -- Title Reward: The Hallowed Merrymaker (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1692)/Merrymaker (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1691) -- Title Reward: Merrymaker The Flame Warden (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1038)/The Flame Keeper (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1039) -- Title Reward: Flame Warden or Flame Keeper To Honor One's Elders (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=913) -- Title Reward: Elder * What A Long, Strange Trip It's Been (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2144)/What a Long, Strange Trips It's Been (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=2145) -- Violet Proto-Drake (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?spell=60024) Feats of Strength- Avast Ye, Admiral! (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=871) -- Title: Bloodsail Admiral Realm First! Conqueror of Naxxramas (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1402) -- Title Reward: Conqueror of Naxxramas Realm First! Magic Seeker (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=1400) -- Title Reward: The Magic Seeker Realm First! Obsidian Slayer (http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?achievement=456) -- Title Reward: Obsidian Slayer[/QUOTE] Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Ratman_tf on November 19, 2008, 08:10:10 AM I want the fishing achievement, but I don't want to be called "Salty" :uhrr:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: DraconianOne on November 19, 2008, 08:21:39 AM I was disappointed that they didn't introduce some titles that were piss easy to get, a la LOTRO but in retrospect and on seeing how many fuckers run around with the "Jenkins" title, I'm not actually that disappointed. I'll stick with "Stone Guard" for now.
Some more flavour titles would be good though - things like <yournamehere> The Feared or <yournamehere> The Cowardly. Or perhaps one for doing the quest "Bring me another shrubbery" umpteen million times which could be "Brave Sir " <yournamehere> Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 19, 2008, 08:22:08 AM I want the fishing achievement, but I don't want to be called "Salty" :uhrr: That's like the best damn PART! Salty Bob at yer service! Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: ClydeJr on November 19, 2008, 08:41:49 AM A guy in my guild was our server's first 80 (elemental troll shaman). Here's what he posted about it:
Quote The plan was to get ahead of the curve to avoid ganks and get server first shaman. I prepped a full set of 20 dailies in the days leading up to launch, so I logged in and was 1/4 of the way to 71 within 10 mins. I'd been in the beta and gotten my mage and rogue up to 72 through Howling Fjord, so I knew the quests there. I started at 2AM PST when everybody in ABS was in bed (seriously, there were like 2 people on), so I wound up connecting with the Ars RS guys for the entire northern part of the zone. I was finishing up the zone around the time that people started getting back on, so I moved to Dragonblight instead of Borean in order to stay in an empty zone. Dinged 73 there and took my planned 4 hour nap. From Dragonblight, went to Grizzly Hills (the zone starts really slow but the last half of the zone is well paced and interesting) till most of the way through 74. It was late night hours by that time, so I hopped over and did about half of Borean Tundra (the starter zones are the fastest for pure leveling speed) while everybody was asleep, which put me most of the way through 75. I got my only gank around 10 AM server in Borean, so I popped back over and finished up Grizzly Hills and moved to Zul'Drak. I had planned on sleeping again when I hit 77, but I got excited about the flying mount and wasn't that tired, so I decided to push on. Kami loaned me 4k gold for the mount and getting a flying mount upped my leveling speed by 40% or so. Burned through 77 and 78 in Zul'Drak and Shalozar and popped over to Storm Peaks because I'd done the quests there on a premade 80 and it's my favorite zone. Decided that I couldn't hit 80 in peaks without getting severely slowed down with the heavy lore quests at the end (which are awesome but not conducive to fast leveling) so I popped over to icecrown and did the initial 3 hubs then back to Storm Peaks to finish. The finish part was fun because I told you all I had 5k to go. At the time I was in an area where the mobs don't give XP (it's for the aforementioned lore quests) but I didn't realize it, so I said like 5k to go and ground through 8 or 9 mobs before I realize they weren't giving XP. When I dinged I had about 600 people whisper me grats, which was awesome. My chat box basically continuously scrolled for about a minute and a half. Chatting as a whole was pretty entertaining. I had transfers talking to me about every 20 minutes from 76 onward and had several dozen people whisper me during 79 asking me "How close are you to 80?" to which I'd reply a percent and they'd respond "cool" and drop the conversation. I also had a bunch of "how u lvl so fast?" for the last two levels. All in all, I was whispering fairly continuously from the time people got up this morning. So that's the story. Took around 40 hours and I wound up being about 45 minutes slower than I expected I'd be when I made my guess at 77. Leveled specced 30/0/3X which is nice because it makes me really tough while keeping most of ele's dps. I died about 15 times and corpse ran once. Quote I have a couple things going for me. First, going so fast lets me treat it like a pve server. I went running around at 1/3 health, no mana, or whatever and didn't have to worry about getting ganked because I was literally the only person in the zone. I similarly didn't have to wait on respawns or escort mobs to appear and didn't have to worry about getting mobs tagged out from under me. More or less all the quests worked for me since I was the first one doing them while others had problems with mobs/objects respawning. In short, going first lets you go faster. Second, ele shamans have really nice burst. My slowest level was 74 (about 4.75 hours) because I got lava burst at 75, which is a guaranteed 4k crit. So the kill pattern was Bolt->Bolt->FlShock->Burst->Bolt, which is 9 seconds per mob with basically no downtime. I maybe went through 2 stacks of water. This is slower than a ret pally can go (I know, buddyshrews really was faster than me, mostly due to aoe) but noticeably faster than a priest. I spent a lot of time chatting with the leading horde priest after I accidentally fell into his battle for undercity and he mentioned it was taking him about 5 hours per level and that his leveling had slowed when he could no longer tab dot targets to death. I really do think prests are faster with spirit tap/surge of light/rest disc than with a shadow build for leveling. Third, I didn't really do anything besides level. No professions, only a few instance runs, few group quests, etc. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 19, 2008, 09:24:03 AM Quote Dinged 73 there and took my planned 4 hour nap. Yea, things like that ensure I'll never be a server first. :ye_gods: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: WindupAtheist on November 19, 2008, 10:27:00 AM Ooh, "The Argent Champion" is a good title for my pally, and I'm already revered with Argent Dawn because I have an OCD fixation on scourgestones. I should finish that off and then go for exalted with Argent Crusade.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 19, 2008, 10:28:18 AM My undead mage is called Hideous. I really have no choice but to go for the Love Fool title :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: K9 on November 19, 2008, 10:42:08 AM I want Chef, sadly I feel that Captain Runsey's lager may hold me back from this goal.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: fuser on November 19, 2008, 10:52:10 AM So far I had two people whisper that they were going to report me for dual boxing on refer a friend when they asked how I was leveling so quick before WoTLK. Funny part is a real friend has referred me as I started over a new account :uhrr:
But honestly that instance leveling is pretty common knowledge and was warned(banned) last time as it was a major way for power leveling services. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 19, 2008, 11:36:53 AM Ooh, "The Argent Champion" is a good title for my pally, and I'm already revered with Argent Dawn because I have an OCD fixation on scourgestones. I should finish that off and then go for exalted with Argent Crusade. AD rep is easy, just rip through Stratholme a few times. My Prot Paladin would pull the live-side undead mobs in chunks of a 100 or so :grin: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Montague on November 19, 2008, 11:40:38 PM So far I had two people whisper that they were going to report me for dual boxing on refer a friend when they asked how I was leveling so quick before WoTLK. Funny part is a real friend has referred me as I started over a new account :uhrr: But honestly that instance leveling is pretty common knowledge and was warned(banned) last time as it was a major way for power leveling services. The funny part is dual boxing isnt against the TOS. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 20, 2008, 01:26:49 AM The funny part is dual boxing isnt against the TOS. Not only that but Blizzard have made several very clear and specific comments (http://www.dual-boxing.com/wiki/index.php/GM_Conversations) saying that dual- and multi- boxing is fine, even using things like keycloning or control of multiple accounts with one keyboard & mouse. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 20, 2008, 03:42:52 AM Yea, as long as there is a person mashing the 'buttons' then they don't really give a shit.
Now a Bot that automatically plays your character through the night farming leather, that will get you a pretty quick ban ticket. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Calantus on November 20, 2008, 03:06:28 PM A guy in my guild was our server's first 80 (elemental troll shaman). Here's what he posted about it: Quote I have a couple things going for me. First, going so fast lets me treat it like a pve server. I went running around at 1/3 health, no mana, or whatever and didn't have to worry about getting ganked because I was literally the only person in the zone. I similarly didn't have to wait on respawns or escort mobs to appear and didn't have to worry about getting mobs tagged out from under me. More or less all the quests worked for me since I was the first one doing them while others had problems with mobs/objects respawning. In short, going first lets you go faster. I have to agree with him here. I really didn't like how I had to wait several minutes to kill every named mob and that most kill/gather quests I had to wait around forever and race to get the tag/item. It would have been much more pleasant being ahead of the pack. The only problem is you need to drop everything else to be ahead of the pack. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Fordel on November 20, 2008, 08:39:04 PM Or you just fall behind the pack :grin:
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 20, 2008, 11:25:36 PM Or you just fall behind the pack :grin: You're going to have to be quite a way behind the pack for it to stop. I'm lvl 70.6 after a week and I usually do my 30 mins in the early morning (like, 6.30am) but I'm still often in competition with others for mobs. However, I have much :heart: for the ultra-fast respawns in Northrend :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: DraconianOne on November 21, 2008, 02:56:55 AM Only had a problem with named spawns on the first day although that was quickly resolved by grouping. The ultra fast spawning is staggering though - the Nerubar spawn around Warsong Hold really did make it feel like an all out invasion. I would clear an area and turn around to find everything had spawned behind me. Extremely manic. Good thing I'd respecced my lock into God mode.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: WindupAtheist on November 21, 2008, 07:39:37 AM AD rep is easy, just rip through Stratholme a few times. My Prot Paladin would pull the live-side undead mobs in chunks of a 100 or so :grin: Decided to do a quick Baron run for AD rep. Deathcharger drops on my second Baron kill ever. Even after being nerfed down from "fucking astronomical" recently, the drop rate is still one percent. :oh_i_see: It has to be because I wasn't really looking for it, and have no particular plans to ride it. (I'm too much of an RP dork to have my paladin go around on an undead horse.) I'm just thinking of the guy on the forums bitching about how he's killed the Baron like 300 times and how the hell can he not have gotten a deathcharger by now, and bla bla bla. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Draegan on November 21, 2008, 10:56:10 AM I was helping a friend of mine powerlevel last weekend with my paladin and I got that piccolo flute thing that makes everyone dance around you.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Oz on November 21, 2008, 11:05:25 AM Quote piccolo flute thing that makes everyone dance around you What? its been a little over a year since i've played. this sounds awesome! where, by chance, can i find one? Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Draegan on November 21, 2008, 11:09:54 AM http://www.wowhead.com/?item=13379
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: apocrypha on November 21, 2008, 11:25:59 AM I love that thing. Favourite WoW item ever.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: WindupAtheist on November 21, 2008, 04:39:28 PM Yeah, I got one of those too. Between the horse, the piccolo, and a fair amount of gold from vendoring obsolete blues and junk, Stratholme hasn't been bad to me.
Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: rk47 on November 21, 2008, 07:42:54 PM I didn't think our stringent capitalization standards applied to forum names. I imagine this comes as a surprise to apocrypha as well. A lot of new sign-ups appeared unable to use the shift key on the first letter of their nic. That had a strong correlation with low quality first posts and ergo long-term survival. Does anybody happen to have a copy of schild's first Waterthread post? Oh, and I'm with Nebu on this - permaban the exploiters or it's a bunch of flowers. They did get reset back to 70, and with a 3 day handicap. Heheh. I assume the next time they're caught doing this, they might be in for a longer ban. I think it's pretty good of a slap. You lost your chance of being the first 80. Then you lost all that effort for nothing. Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Llyse on November 21, 2008, 09:48:15 PM "Time is Money friend!" :awesome_for_real:
geh, looks like I'll have to resub WoW at some point :heartbreak: Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Gobbeldygook on November 21, 2008, 11:08:05 PM Oh, and I'm with Nebu on this - permaban the exploiters or it's a bunch of flowers. They do permaban exploiters, just not on a first offense. I believe Blizzard follows a 'Two strikes and you're out' rule. The first time you step out of line, you get a 3 day ban. The second time is a permaban.Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: Oban on November 22, 2008, 03:23:55 AM Had one of these drop from an elite mob in Icecrown yesterday, kind of odd...
http://www.wowhead.com/?item=37254 (http://www.wowhead.com/?item=37254) Title: Re: Blizz to Exploiters "F U" Post by: WindupAtheist on November 24, 2008, 05:28:54 PM Paladin or no, I broke down and have been using my Baron mount more than my pally epic or my AV goat. Riding through Stormwind, some stranger sends me a tell.
Stranger: Lucky! Me: Huh? Stranger: The deathcharger. Me: Oh yeah, I like it. Stranger: They're hard to get. Me: Funny part is, it dropped on my 2nd kill while farming AD rep. Stranger: OMG I hate you! Me: ^_^ Epeen + 1 |