Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 17, 2017, 10:35:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
Donate! | Subscribe! | Shop: Amazon

***DONATION DRIVE 2 HAS BEGUN:
CLICK HERE TO BURN MONEY***
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  PC/Console Gaming  |  Topic: Civilization VI 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Civilization VI  (Read 12504 times)
Rendakor
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8839


Reply #175 on: May 12, 2017, 12:07:00 PM

I'm sort of a weirdo but I like playing Civ with no AI Civs and just colonizing the world. This usually means opening a game, going into the editor and deleting all the other Civs. Seems like VI wouldn't be terrible for me.

Check out my podcast: ADD&D, Attention Deficit Dungeons & Dragons!
"I think it's time for a dose of F13 RED PILL MOTHER FUCKERS" ~cosapi
Merusk
Terracotta Army
Posts: 27252

Badge Whore


Reply #176 on: May 12, 2017, 01:10:20 PM

Yes. That's how I enjoy it most as well. Huge world but with only 2 other Civs.

You want the other 2 Civs just for trading partners. Sure you could do trade routes with city-states but that's less fun and you don't have good candidates to drop nukes on later.

I can't get past the panties - Alluvian
I really like the cocks. - Lantyssa
People rarely believe just how good I am at sucking. - Lantyssa
I love the swinging dongs - Signe
Sky
Terracotta Army
Posts: 29248

I love my TV an' hug my TV an' call it 'George'.


WWW
Reply #177 on: May 12, 2017, 01:31:58 PM

I usually play huge archipelago with 4-6 civs, so yeah...not exactly a strategy crunch. Mostly colonizing and relaxing.

Though the Mod Which Shall Not Be Named was my one exception in the series, that was way more fun with tons of civs, because each had a flavor and strat of their own.

Endie
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6231


WWW
Reply #178 on: May 12, 2017, 03:30:21 PM

I should probably give this another try.  I tend to ratchet the difficulty way down in Civ anyway and just roll over everything with my massive empire.  Much more cathartic than getting into another nuclear war with Gandhi.

Play EUIV instead, with the (I seem to remember) El Dorado expansion.  Create a custom nation for 800 points with a bunch of maxed-out national ideas in morale, discipline and infantry ability, and give yourself both coasts of the channel from Oldenburg down to Caux and south to Paris but with your capital in London.  You'll still have decisions to make but France and England will be crippled enough that you can steadily progress.

The AI is a bazillion times better tha the current state of Civ VI (not perfect, especially around naval warfare, but functional even there) and you will still "win" at most difficulty levels.

Also why are you not on discord this will not stand and is going in your annual review, young man.

Sorry but don't listen to this advice. EUIV is *not* the same type of game as Civ, and even on easy difficulties it is astronomically harder to play than Civ. I love EUIV, but would never advise people to play it if they like polaying on the lower, more relaxing difficulties of Civ!

If you do play on the lower levels, Civ 6 is fine and works great -0 it looks pretty, has some interesting mechanics, and you can crush Gandhi into the ground as all good Civ players should.

I happen to know that Phildo is very aware that there is a difference between civ 6 and eu4.  I'm not sure if he has ever tried using the custom nation designer.

And Ghandi will always nuke you.

My blog: http://endie.net

Twitter - Endieposts

"What else would one expect of Scottish sociopaths sipping their single malt Glenlivit [sic]?" Jack Thompson
Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5209


Reply #179 on: May 12, 2017, 11:32:15 PM

Truth.  I've never played EUIV, but I'm well aware of it.  I've just had less and less patience for trying to figure out complicated UIs and new systems.  Civ is pretty, largely intuitive and I've been playing it since the first one.

Also, I'm still in discord.  I'm going through a lurking phase.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 26638

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #180 on: May 31, 2017, 02:52:21 PM

I won't buy at release, as these people are on the same rules as Total War now, but I am interested to see if they can make the AI actually decent without turning it into a RNG cheating machine.

And a year later, I guess that answer I'm reading is a solid no. Shame.

CPA, Sports blogger, Mount and Blade enthusiast
Braves by the Numbers, my sports blog
Khaldun
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8640


Reply #181 on: June 01, 2017, 06:27:53 AM

Yeah, as far as I can tell, they're not as committed to improving this as they were with Civ V.
Bunk
Contributor
Posts: 5652

Operating Thetan One


Reply #182 on: June 01, 2017, 09:27:10 AM

Its sad, but I just can't bring myself to play it. Still play Civ V with the Community mod pack on a regular basis.

"Welcome to the internet, pussy." - VDL
"I have retard strength." - Schild
naum
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4225


WWW
Reply #183 on: June 01, 2017, 04:44:59 PM

I still haven't pulled the trigger on this.

It looks beautiful.

But right before Civ VI release, I revisited Civ V and like every game, no matter the settings (and I randomized all of them, every game), every game played out exactly the same.

And then I read all the issues with gameplay upon release. Compelling me to wait until 1st major expansion / patch. But I'm still waiting.

"We offered players a Camelot. We immediately discovered players wanted to smear shit all over the walls, create giant penises out of whatever was available, rape, rob and kill their fellow players and anything else not given invulnerability while making the teabag emote over their corpses and generally be utter and complete cunts. So we dialed it back a little." ~HaemishM
Azuredream
Terracotta Army
Posts: 867


Reply #184 on: June 01, 2017, 06:40:10 PM

I don't play Civ 5 anymore because of what you said, every game plays out exactly the same. Get 4 cities, build stuff, win game. It's why I prefer playing Civ 6 because each game is at least semi-different. You could have some mountains nearby that would make a great campus spot. You've got to figure out where you can put your industrial districts for max efficiency. If there's some desert nearby you can go for Pyramids. You won't be able to do every eureka every game so you have to find out which ones are feasible and which ones you'll skip. Most importantly where you start and how much room you have to expand dictates how many cities you can build. There's not some stupid arbitrary limit of well I have 4 cities so I guess I better stop making settlers for the rest of the game.

This is speaking as someone who doesn't like early war and doesn't bother attacking people in the first 100 turns unless they're walking an unprotected settler next to my unit for some dumb reason.

The Lord of the Land approaches..
Khaldun
Terracotta Army
Posts: 8640


Reply #185 on: June 01, 2017, 07:38:24 PM

It's a really difficult thing with 4X games in general. I've only played a few that produce dramatically different feeling endgames. That famous Civ IV mod that we all like to talk about here is one of the few. It really comes down to having strong factions that are also in some sense play-balanced so that one or two don't become the default alpha faction, and then having an AI that can handle the variations. I'm not sure we'll ever have a game that fully handles all that.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  PC/Console Gaming  |  Topic: Civilization VI  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC