f13.net

f13.net General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Sky on February 08, 2005, 01:13:13 PM



Title: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 08, 2005, 01:13:13 PM
I started a reply to a pm from Stray (from a while back, it's not very personal so I hope he doesn't mind, pm if you do, Stray), but I figured maybe it'd spark some conversation from the musicians in the crowd, and imo we need more music talk!

Anyway, here's the quote I was addressing:
Quote
I try downtuning, but the sound just gets muddy, and the strings seem a little loose and "wobbly", if you know what I mean. Is it almost necessary to get a 7-string? Or are nu-metal guitarists using octave pedals or something? Where the hell does all that low end come from, man?
We were talking about tone and gear. I didn't have any experience in newer gear, so at the time I couldn't really provide a decent answer.

Lately, I've been thinking of ditching my cheesy cheapo guitar and buying a 'real' guitar. Also been playing sickly downtuned, inspired by my recent purchase of the live Black Label Society discs. Since I hate the idea of a 7-string guitar, I started looking into baritone guitars, which are very nice indeed. Fills an aural gap I often have playing either the guitar or bass, sounds heavy as hell and great for squeels and bends.

I think for the time being I'm going to shoot for a standard guitar (probably a les paul studio, can't afford custom with the tastier necks).

But one thing of interest I learned from my blues buddy, Jimmy Wolf (http://jimmywolf.iuma.com), who uses a baritone when he plays without a bass player (duo with drummer). He avoids the mud that baritone and downtuned guitars suffer by cranking up the mids most guitarists scoop out for a heavy sound these days. It cleaned up a lot of the sound, though there's obviously a lot farther you can take it, but that little bit helped me out (and was obvious once he said it). Didn't do much for the muddiness when palm-muting, though, but then, I'm still on an extremely downtuned standard guitar.

Anyone else want to talk guitar playing or gear? And if I'm playing a mmog with you and suddenly disappear...I'm playing guitar and forgot I'm logged in ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 08, 2005, 01:54:27 PM
I have nothing to add here, except that I want one of these basses:

(http://www.spaltbasses.com/images/lwpage1.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on February 08, 2005, 02:02:54 PM
You're well aware of my n00bishness when it comes to all things guitar, but I'm all about this sort of thing, particularly where gear is concerned.  I may not have talent/skill, but I do have disposable income.  :P

Have you checked out the Schecter Hellcat VI?  

(http://www.schecterguitars.com/Dproducts/2004_models/hellcat_VI/hellcat_VI_blk.jpg)

Sounds like what you're looking for gear-wise.  I played with one for a little at the Mobile GC and was pretty impressed w/fit/finish.  30" scale(!) and 3 'buckers.  It really punches out that 'chunka-chunka' sound it sounds like you're looking for.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 08, 2005, 06:49:39 PM
I had the good fortune of speaking with Tommy Victor after that PM (singer/guitar of Prong, current guitarist for Danzig). Straight from the horse's mouth! He gave me the rundown on baritones, and recommended the Schecter C1-EX (the Schecter Scorpion is similar, just a different body shape -- the Hellcat has a 30" scale and is kind of in a category of it's own). It's a 6 string slim neck, with a slightly longer scale to compensate for the big strings (String size is 13 to 62 -- standard tuning is B to B, but can go even lower than that and still sound great. The Hellcat is too crazy for me -- 25 to 95).

Funny that you mentioned this though. I finally gathered enough spare cash that I ordered one this morning, in fact. I'm not sure if it'll replace my SG or Fenders, but I understand what you're saying about that aural gap between bass and guitar. It may not be standard, but somehow this sounds just right. I'm also 6'4", and the extended scale feels perfect...Like a bass. Yet, it isn't a bass.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/bj_c1_ex_blk_pop.jpg)
C1-EX - Simple, but pretty

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/scorpion_sbk_pop.jpg)
Scorpion - Same great sound, but a little tacky for my tastes


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 09, 2005, 05:00:16 AM
I think for the time being I'm going to shoot for a standard guitar (probably a les paul studio, can't afford custom with the tastier necks).

Since you like Black Label, why not go for a Zakk model (Supposedly the Epiphone models are still pretty good....but about $2000 dollars cheaper)? From what I understand, he downtunes to the C range on some of his guitars, but still sounds great. Not exactly what baritones are capable of, but that's low enough.

I'm sure it's possible to get a LP Studio to do some of the same things, but I think the ZW necks are a little different than most LP models (not sure about that). I was thinking of doing the same with my SG, but figured it best to keep it how it is, since it's my only Gibson.

A couple of things to do is get the neck set up to handle really thick strings. Supposedly, Zakk's signature GHS strings (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/base_pid/100447/) are perfect for it : He uses very thick guages for rhythm (70), but normal guages on the high notes for leads (10). The EMG active pickups (EMG 81's and 85's) on his models boost a lot of midrange as well (among other things), so you're friend may be on to something.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 09, 2005, 08:54:05 AM
He says he shaves the necks down, I'm not sure if he's just talking shaving off the finish or if he actually digs down deeper to change the shape at all. He says he's going for the feel of a baseball bat, heh. But yeah, I was checking out his model, it seems to make a lot of the upgrades I'd need anyway...I just hate to have another guitarist's recognizable pattern on my guitar :) Like playing Eddie's black and red or something. Just feels cheesy.

Part of the issue I have with BLS tuning, they super detune the low string, I prefer standard tuning, which is why I was thinking about the baritones. Get some of the low end but keep the standard tuning. I dunno, might just have to learn to play detuned (I can do drop d, it's just annoying imo, though it makes basic power chords simple, I guess).

That Schecter looks nice, I need to get myself to a decent guitar shop (long drive, over an hour heh). Kinda looks like a PRS imo. I don't like the shallowed body scoop of the Scorpion, though, looks like it's not as friendly to playing on the higher frets. Thanks for the heads-up.

Bought the BLS concert DVD, pretty nice. Besides being a great show (and Trujillo on bass), there is a bit from some guitar instruction thing Zakk did, three solos. I ran through those and watching him riff just brought me back to the days of shred, so I did some shred practice and learned just how much stamina I've lost. Great practice, though, and highlighted the fact that I never learned a good climbing arpeggio to match my descending arpeggios. My landlord must've thought someone else was playing, because I'd rip out the descending and then struggle to find a good picking pattern (hint: alternate picking ain't cutting it, heh) for teh ascending, and it's all sloppy and mistimed...and then rip back down the descending. I got a kick out of sounding like total garbage, oddly enough. Fun to learn something I've let slide for decades. Also hilarious to hear Zakk, who's a boozing, cussing redneck, give a lesson, trying to be polite and aiming it toward younger guitarists, obviously.
Quote from: Mr N
It really punches out that 'chunka-chunka' sound it sounds like you're looking for.
Yeah, that's the dilemma...I want a nice guitar for my more aggressive stuff, and a baritone is perfect. But I really need to get hands-on to see how it fits with all the other stuff I play. I definitely need a good acoustic, too, love playing acoustic guitar, I love the rich tone and percussiveness. Maybe what I really need is a second job ;)
Quote from: Righ
I have nothing to add here, except that I want one of these basses:
Nice looking bass. I'd like to get a Warwick bass (http://www.warwickbass.com/basses/thumb_bass.html) if I had the dough. Hell, even some new pickups (bartolini PJs) for my old ESP Custom bass (bought at their shop in hollyweird directly from the luthier!)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 09, 2005, 08:59:43 AM
Nice looking bass. I'd like to get a Warwick bass (http://www.warwickbass.com/basses/thumb_bass.html) if I had the dough. Hell, even some new pickups (bartolini PJs) for my old ESP Custom bass (bought at their shop in hollyweird directly from the luthier!)

I'd love one of those too! All I have is the getting started bass from Ibanez. Of course, I haven't been playing it enough to really get started. Fucking computer games.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 09, 2005, 09:52:46 AM
Part of the issue I have with BLS tuning, they super detune the low string, I prefer standard tuning, which is why I was thinking about the baritones. Get some of the low end but keep the standard tuning. I dunno, might just have to learn to play detuned (I can do drop d, it's just annoying imo, though it makes basic power chords simple, I guess).

Heh, I'm what you'd call a "slow hand". Don't feel bad about losing any of the shredding capabilities that you had -- I never really had them to begin with. I'm mainly into rhythm, or songwriting, I guess....Pretty much stink at everything else. So I won't have some of the issues with baritones that I suspect you may have. Hard to say. It could be just that I suck at leads in the first place.  :wink:

For what it's worth, reviewers on Harmony Central seem to be of all types though. Some lead players, some not, but just about all of them consider it (or the Scorpion) one of the better guitars they've ever played. And for $500, it's a steal. It may not be American made, but very rarely are guitars with the same features that cheap. The only thing I'm going to replace is the bridge pickup with a Dimebucker. But after that, I don't really see much to improve.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on February 09, 2005, 11:37:39 AM
Here is my experience with detuning:

Dropped D - works well for a heavy sound, and can make some heavy licks a bit easier to play.  Works well because you have a complete octave scale within two strings playing basically only two frets.  :-)

Half step down (E flat) - Metallica did this, and SRV used to play like this.  Songs in this tuning are a bit easier to sing (natural E is a difficult scale to sing in for some reason).  String tension is still ok with a standard scale length.

Dropped C - this is where you tune down a full step (D G C F A D), then drop the low D string down a full step (just like dropped D with a standard tuning).  I'm not a big fan of this, but many a metal band has tried this.  For me, the sound gets too muddy because there is no string tension, and you loose a lot of harmonic content.

7 String (low B) - This is my current favorite tuning, because everything is standard.  7 string guitars also have a little bit longer scale length, which means you can maintain string tension at alternate tunings without loosing sustain.  I posted a few song clips I did with my new 7 string here on F13 about a month ago.

I got my 7 string from the Carvin custom shop, and it's a spawn of Satan.  Gloss black, black chrome hardware, and no fret dots.  I'll take some pics of my gear tonight and post them here, if anyone is interested.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 09, 2005, 11:41:19 AM
I got my 7 string from the Carvin custom shop, and it's a spawn of Satan.  Gloss black, black chrome hardware, and no fret dots.  I'll take some pics of my gear tonight and post them here, if anyone is interested.

I'm interested  :) How much did it run anyways?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on February 09, 2005, 11:52:11 AM
Quote
How much did it run anyways?

It was about $800 delivered, with case.
 (http://www.carvin.com/products/guitar.php?ItemNumber=DC747)
The Carvin custom shop does some really fantastic work, especially considering the cost.  About the only complaint I have with this guitar is the pickups.  I'm thinking of switching to an EMG setup (http://www.emginc.com/displayproducts.asp?section=Guitar&categoryid=6&catalogid=89), which I basically use on ALL my guitars.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 09, 2005, 12:08:42 PM
Miguel - that was some good stuff, too. I haven't unchecked it in iTunes yet (bad songs get unchecked quickly, only 2100 songs on my work pc, though), it comes up on random now and again and I have to think "Who the heck is this, pretty good!...Oh, that guy!" If you want to show off your gear, please do! When my band was first getting out and about, we used to keep a current Carvin catalog in our van to drool over the PA systems and whatnot. Always been a solid company imo.

I think part of what I dislike about drop-d is that it's so easy to do basic metal stuff, so a TON of players use it. I don't like things the easy way, I guess, but at the same time, the running transposition of what fret on the "E" string I should be playing when in drop d gets annoying to me. So I use it for stuff I wrote years ago in drop d, but I don't write or play with it otherwise.

I was playing my cheesy guitar (real cheesy, an exgirlfriend's that she left me because she felt pity, a Cort strat knock-off) sickly downtuned, as I mentioned. I just tuned it back up last night, forget what the E was at, but it was waaaay down, I think it was A, the rest tuned to that in standard tuning. Jangly and wicked muddy. Sabbath also played in Eb (flat, heh), I think I'm tuned in standard tuning with the low string at D or Db right now.

Another problem I have with nonstandard tuning is that I can play in any key pretty easily in standard E tuning, and as I say about drop d, it's just annoying to constantly try transposing keys in my head, I'd rather just sit back and play ;) If I'm thinking about scales and signatures, I'm not playing well.
Quote
Heh, I'm what you'd call a "slow hand"
I have spent the last couple years rebulding my chops, and I've really spent a lot more time playing blues than anything else. My good friend is a blues connysewer, and he absolutely hates when people start shredding during a blues song. To be fair, he means inappropriately, and we discussed this because one standard guy at a local open mic is ALWAYS shredding at the wrong time, in the wrong song, with his teeth (I'd even slap Hendrix for that crap, heh). So I almost feel bad about having shred chops, heh. I'm putting them in more now that I have a lot better emotion, I've gotten my bends and phrasing up to snuff (acceptable, anyway), so they are fitting in here and there.

But shredding is definitely only one aspect to what I'm shooting for. I'd like to get a band where I can be polyinstrumental and polygenre, play some reggae, blues, metal, rock, jazz, country, just have fun and jam type thing. Shredding just takes a lot of physical practice, no getting around it, heh...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 10, 2005, 06:30:25 AM
Here's another question: How many guitars, basses, and amps have you owned in your lifetime? Just wondering if you're like me. I'm 27 now, started playing around 12, and off the top of my head, I can think of something around 20 guitars (some pretty good), several basses, and at least 10 amps (some were crappy combos, but not all) that I have passed through my hands. All doomed to pawn shop hell  :evil: It seems like only recently that I've managed to hold on to my gear for more than a few years (don't get me started on effects pedals heh).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 10, 2005, 09:03:08 AM
Oh hell, I don't know. What I do know is that I've never sold anything, it's always been ripped off. I'd estimate maybe a dozen guitars, I find one I like and stick with it. Nothing too fancy, I used to play BC Rich Biches when I was playing a lot of guitar in the band, when I was playing bass, I'd play my guitarist's (very nice) Ibanezes. Ibanezii? For the bass, I started on a Peavey which I had gutted and rebuilt, my sound guy and I redid all the electronics, it was hot as hell, huge body that held a shitton of stickers, super long maple neck. When that got stolen, I used a Rickenbacker for about a year, which was pretty limiting as far as upper fret access, so I bought the ESP custom (kind of a cross between an explorer and a bich) I have now, which has the best neck I've ever played, real long and thin, great action.

Effects, can't count those, either. I was a studio rat in addition to my band being a road dog, we played an average of three or four hours every day for years, not counting individual practice. Part of why I'm such a fan of great live bands. But as a studio rat, I collected a ton of gear, I liked the older effects over the newer digital combo effects units (though that's what I'm using now, because it's cheap and available: a Boss GT-6, decent pedal, but just a placeholder until I can get some decent amps). Stomp pedals, I'd say I've had at least 50 over the years (some traded, most stolen). My favorite stomp pedal is probably the proco rat distortion.

Amps, as a guitarist I was using a Laney full stack. The only thing besides my first guitar my parents bought me, as a high school graduation present (for graduating with honors). Thanks mom and dad, heh. Nice stack for metal stuff, which is where I was then. We had been cobbling old amps together before that, my singer was singing through my old guitar head (for rehearsal, natch). When I moved to bass, I took that guitar head, which was some crazy 60's brand Kustom Lounge or something, but had great raw power without distortion. Put it on a 2-15" Peavey cab loaded out with a couple full range 400W EV speakers. Wicked solid and punchy, I stuck with that cheesy combo through my whole professional bass career, much to the amusement of other bassists....until they heard the tone I pulled from it, then they came with lots of questions, heh. I was alll about the tone, who cares how you get it! After that was stolen, I picked up a cheesy Peavey bass amp (only like 150W, limp) but a couple nice cabs, an Ampeg 8x10" and a Dean Markley 1x15" loaded with my sweet EV 400W full-ranger. That's what I'm playing guitar through as well, these days.

The band also went through a couple PA systems. Got our first one from a retiring local band for a song, complete. We had no clue how to use it at the time, and an art school friend of mine was at a rehearsal and laughed at our setup. Turns out his dad's an electrician and he knows his stuff, so he rewired everything and updated a lot of the cheesy electronics and became our first sound guy (the one who helped customize my peavey bass). When we 'made it' (heh) we bought a sick sound system with 4 4x15"s as the main beef, upgraded our board and rack.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on February 10, 2005, 02:37:48 PM
I have two different rigs I use depending on what kind of band I'm playing/practicing with at the time:

Rig #1 - Jazz Setup - I am playing a fretless 5 string Carvin with Tomastik Infield flat wound strings.  Gives that great "muwah" sound for jazz.  For amplification, I'm playing through a Sovtek Mig 100B 100W tube bass head, with a ported 4x10" cabinet.  Great gobs of low end, however it can get a bit growly if I turn it up too much.  I'd love to get a real upright double bass but I don't have two grand to throw around at this time.

Rig #2 - Rock Setup - Playing my new Ibanez 5 string (the Music Man copy, SRX505 (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=SRX505)) with dual humbuckers.  I am using a preamp/power amp setup:  preamp is a SansAmp RBI (http://www.sansamp.com/rbi.html) rack mount preamp, into a QSC 700 watt PLX power amp (http://www.qscaudio.com/products/amps/plx/plx.htm).  Takes up only 3 rack spaces in total, and weight less than 30 pounds total.  Cabinets vary depending on where I am playing:  I have a 2x12" cab I use, and sometimes I use the 4x10" cabinet from the jazz gigs.  I am currently assembling parts to make up one of Len Moskowitz's Compact Bottom Ends (http://www.core-sound.com/bottom-article.html) since I am selling my truck, my main avenue of mass gear transportation.  I don't have a ton of room to lug around huge cabinets anymore.

However I don't use any of this stuff for making recordings, with the exception of the Sanamp RBI.  For everything else I am using a Vamp Pro system from Behringer and recording everything direct using a cabinet simulator.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 10, 2005, 04:09:20 PM
Right now, my primary guitars are an SG Special and an American Standard Strat. Everything is pretty much stock atm. I have a couple Tex Mex Teles and Strats, a Tex Mex Jazz Bass (no bass amp atm), and an old Ibanez as well (not sure what model...I just keep it around for the Floyd Rose). And of course, the Schecter is on it's way.

The only gig worthy amp is a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe (40 watts, but tube power!=solid state). When Fenders are plugged in, I'm jacked in through the guitar input. Just Fender tone. Rarely any effects. For the Gibson, I use a V-Amp, but jacked directly into the preamp input, which bypasses the Hot Rod's 12ax7 preamp (Digital modeling preamp with a 6L6 poweramp -- Sweet as hell).

Since I've purchased a Vox Valvetronix (http://www.voxamps.co.uk/products/valvetronix/vt_audition.htm), I use it more often though. It isn't nearly as loud as the Hot Rod, but the tone blows away any of the other digital modelers like Line 6 and Behringer. Compare them yourself. It kind of follows the same principle of what I do with combining the Vamp and the Hotrod's 6L6's (by using real tube saturation for the power stage), but with 12AX7's (at least for saturation. The output is still dependent on a solid state power stage). Not only that, but it models famous stomp boxes as well. The only better combo I could think of is if I purchased a Vox Tonelab (stompbox version of the Valvetronix) and ran it through the power amp of the Hot Rod (like I do with the V-Amp).

EDIT: Hmm...I was just reading that previous paragraph over, and on second glance, it seems a little confusing. My bad.

Anyways, point is: Combining power tube saturation with a digital modeling preamp has given me the best tone (and verstatility as well) for the least amount of cash.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on February 15, 2005, 03:06:13 AM
Zakk plays a pretty bare bones rig.  His Les Pauls sport EMGs and that's about it.  He tunes 'em down, but you can get the same strings he uses at any big store.  His amplification is strictly 80s and was produced long before the downtuning trend began.  I think he does a  good job at showing that one doesn't need exotic equipment to produce "modern" sounds.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on February 15, 2005, 03:11:03 AM
Right now, my primary guitars are an SG Special and an American Standard Strat. Everything is pretty much stock atm. I have a couple Tex Mex Teles and Strats, a Tex Mex Jazz Bass (no bass amp atm), and an old Ibanez as well (not sure what model...I just keep it around for the Floyd Rose). And of course, the Schecter is on it's way.

The only gig worthy amp is a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe (40 watts, but tube power!=solid state). When Fenders are plugged in, I'm jacked in through the guitar input. Just Fender tone. Rarely any effects. For the Gibson, I use a V-Amp, but jacked directly into the preamp input, which bypasses the Hot Rod's 12ax7 preamp (Digital modeling preamp with a 6L6 poweramp -- Sweet as hell).

Since I've purchased a Vox Valvetronix (http://www.voxamps.co.uk/products/valvetronix/vt_audition.htm), I use it more often though. It isn't nearly as loud as the Hot Rod, but the tone blows away any of the other digital modelers like Line 6 and Behringer. Compare them yourself. It kind of follows the same principle of what I do with combining the Vamp and the Hotrod's 6L6's (by using real tube saturation for the power stage), but with 12AX7's (at least for saturation. The output is still dependent on a solid state power stage). Not only that, but it models famous stomp boxes as well. The only better combo I could think of is if I purchased a Vox Tonelab (stompbox version of the Valvetronix) and ran it through the power amp of the Hot Rod (like I do with the V-Amp).

EDIT: Hmm...I was just reading that previous paragraph over, and on second glance, it seems a little confusing. My bad.

Anyways, point is: Combining power tube saturation with a digital modeling preamp has given me the best tone (and verstatility as well) for the least amount of cash.

I've always had a thing for Line6 because they have dedicated themselves to 100% digital.  Their newest software is pretty damn good, IMO.

But if you want to combine digital with loud, run a line out from your Valvetronix, into the line in of your HRD, which will bypass the preamp section of your HRD.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 16, 2005, 02:24:17 PM
So...Just got that Schecter today. The top string is creating a lot of fret buzz, but since baritones and 7 strings are kind of new to me, I'm not sure if I should try adjusting it myself or not. I don't want to fuck with the truss rod. At a glance, the neck looks OK, so I don't think that's it anyways.

Do you think a simple bridge adjustment may work, or should I just take it to a shop? Did any of you with baritones or 7-strings need additional setup after you got 'em?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: CmdrSlack on February 16, 2005, 02:50:40 PM
Not on the topic of gear (cause my bass is a sucky one for fooling around on), but on the topic of guitars....

Does anyone know of a good place to find scales/drills for bass to build dexterity/speed?

I'm tired of seeing how fast I can play a 12 bar blues progression....


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on February 16, 2005, 02:50:56 PM
So...Just got that Schecter today. The top string is creating a lot of fret buzz, but since baritones and 7 strings are kind of new to me, I'm not sure if I should try adjusting it myself or not. I don't want to fuck with the truss rod. At a glance, the neck looks OK, so I don't think that's it anyways.

Do you think a simple bridge adjustment may work, or should I just take it to a shop? Did any of you with baritones or 7-strings need additional setup after you got 'em?

Where's it buzzing?  Nearer the headstock or the bridge?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on February 16, 2005, 02:51:36 PM
Not on the topic of gear (cause my bass is a sucky one for fooling around on), but on the topic of guitars....

Does anyone know of a good place to find scales/drills for bass to build dexterity/speed?

I'm tired of seeing how fast I can play a 12 bar blues progression....

http://www.activebass.com/lessons/lessdir.asp
http://www.cyberfretbass.com/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 16, 2005, 04:16:46 PM
So...Just got that Schecter today. The top string is creating a lot of fret buzz, but since baritones and 7 strings are kind of new to me, I'm not sure if I should try adjusting it myself or not. I don't want to fuck with the truss rod. At a glance, the neck looks OK, so I don't think that's it anyways.

Do you think a simple bridge adjustment may work, or should I just take it to a shop? Did any of you with baritones or 7-strings need additional setup after you got 'em?

Where's it buzzing?  Nearer the headstock or the bridge?

Both....Think I solved most of it though. I called Schecter up and they told me to just loosen the truss rod one turn. I might need to raise the bridge a tiny bit too, not sure. There's still a little buzz, but not as much before, especially when plugged in. Now it sounds like another one I played, so I guess I'm cool.

Next stop: New pickups  :-D

This guitar is frickin' sweet as it is though. And the next chance I get, I'm gonna have to buy a standard tuning C-Series Schecter as well.

Sky: In case you lose interest in the baritones, you should still try one of the normal Schecters. They're a fuckload better than any Gibson or Fender in the same price range. Hell, even better than some models that cost twice as much...and a Schecter is versatile enough to sound like both.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on February 16, 2005, 06:15:28 PM
Both....Think I solved most of it though. I called Schecter up and they told me to just loosen the truss rod one turn. I might need to raise the bridge a tiny bit too, not sure. There's still a little buzz, but not as much before, especially when plugged in. Now it sounds like another one I played, so I guess I'm cool.

Next stop: New pickups  :-D

Sweet!  :)

Quote
This guitar is frickin' sweet as it is though. And the next chance I get, I'm gonna have to buy a standard tuning C-Series Schecter as well.

Sky: In case you lose interest in the baritones, you should still try one of the normal Schecters. They're a fuckload better than any Gibson or Fender in the same price range. Hell, even better than some models that cost twice as much...and a Schecter is versatile enough to sound like both.

(http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM05/Content/Schecter/PR/Banshee-Marine-Metallic-sm.jpg)

This upcoming Schecter model has me drooling something fierce, but I really dig vintage-style guitars.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trias_e on February 16, 2005, 06:26:21 PM
I love my schecter, it's a Blackjack C-1.

I mainly play metal, but this guitar has got some versatility.  The stock pickups have a quite nice sound to my eyes, clean or distortion.

I don't know a ton about guitars by any means, I just know what I like.  And I like this.  Probably better than anything else I've played thats priced around 500 bucks, although the ESP Viper 400 for me definitely was up there as well.


(http://www.schecterguitars.com/Dproducts/2004_models/bj_c1/bj_c1_blk_pop.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 16, 2005, 07:34:04 PM
The C-1 is exactly like mine, except the EX is extended scale. Other than that, same good guitar.

To derail a bit:

I hate drummers.

At least I do right now. Lately, it seems like every one of them wants to be the next Neil Peart. I'm tired of that shit -- play a fucking song damnit! Everything I've tried to get going lately turns into session of watching the drummer getting his rocks off -- at the exclusion of everyone else (i.e. the song). With all due respect to Neil, fuck him. Fuck Keith Moon and fuck Dave Lombardo too. Give me Charlie Watts instead.

Better yet, I'll just use a sequencer.

edit: Heh...Sorry, bad night.

Oh, and don't correct me on Neil. I'm just ranting. I know full well what he's capable of, and that he himself has no problem with song structure. Hell, he's even the primary songwriter for his band. I just don't get the deal with some of the guys I've run into lately. I've accomplished nothing with any of them. Seems to me like they've been playing by themselves for far too long.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 17, 2005, 06:39:05 AM
Shit, that's why I'm not in a band. I've sauntered through the musical community in my backwater town and found it sorely lacking. I did find one good drummer, but he's in a long term project that I thought sucked. Too bad, that cat was good on drums and could play guitar, too (which was cool because it let me get some time on the bass).

I like active, syncopated drummers. I don't like drummers who play stock beats, straight 4/4 rock beats, that stuff. That said, I assume a drummer can play to the song and stay in time, etc. If you can't even do that, you need a few more year's practice with people who need practice. I mean, I feel I need a ton of practice, but with higher level stuff, not just playing the song and keeping it in time.

The other side of it is personality. I like strong, confident players, but not egotistical ones. Unfortunately, it seems in this local arena, confidence and ego seem to go hand in hand. One kid I was going to approach for bass duties in my project totally blew it one night. Walked into an open mic night and I was jamming with the aforementioned wicked drummer, improving some tasty metal and shredding some leads (we were talking about doing a totally improvisational metal project. well more than talking, heh) and the bassist walked in. At first I was excited, I wanted him in on this project...and he just played some off the wall shit, out of tune and time, basically killed the jam we had going. When we stopped, he kept asking us if we wanted to play some Primus. After he asked like a dozen times (literally), in the interest of not being seen as the local jerk guitarist, I set the guitar down and hit the bar with the drummer, leaving the kid alone on stage. He then went to the mic and started asking the house if anyone wanted to play Primus. I hate folks who get so hung up on one artist like that, if I really like an artist, I intentionally try to NOT learn their music, to avoid getting stuck on them and not developing my own sound. I'd heard the kid (bassist) was a pita to work with, but then, so am I, heh. But apparently I'm a bit less so....unless you want to play Primus, I guess. There's also a tension, because I used to be the pre-eminent bassist in my podunk town before my band moved on to pursue a professional career, I think he always held that against me and was trying to show off. Of course, I was also the last of the traditional Geezer Butler/Cliff Burton type bassists, after our band most bands started with that slap bass crap. I can appreciate it, I think Les Claypool is nothing short of an amazing genius...just totally not my thing.

Funny thing is...I watched Some Kind of Monster last night, and seeing Cliff always inspires me. I got to the audition scene and was surprised at how many 'big name' bass players (jeordi white, danny lohner, eric avery, etc) just don't have much going on. They could barely play Seek&Destroy, a song that was so overplayed in our old scene that I actually boycotted it (and creeping death). Now.,..I was a guitarist back then, I don't actually know any metallica songs (well, a few like master of puppets, battery, and shortest straw) on bass. But I picked up the bass and wailed through the audition, I guess part of it is that Cliff was such an influence, got me into music theory, and the jammy Geezer, so I tend to jam through pieces more (leaving room for the singer and solos, natch, it's a balancing act). And I'm sure being in my living room cut down on the stress of jamming with metallica, heh. Anyway, point it, I've been working on my guitar chops for a few years now and I can still pick up the bass and destroy my guitar playing, like riding a bike (except for the massive blood blisters because I play so hard hehe).

/morning ramble where's my caffeine whew that was a ramblation sorry


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 17, 2005, 08:09:58 AM
Neil Peart is a great drummer. But like you both said, he plays to the song and adds his personality moments TO the song, instead of in spite of the song. Any asshead who wants to be in a band has to learn it isn't all about him and his instrument. Same with Les Claypool. Outstanding bass player, but if he tried to play the Primus type stuff in a Metallica joint, it would totally fuck the song up, because they wouldn't mesh. I don't play anymore, but I at least understand that colloborative projects like bands require compromise on all fronts, or you end up sounding like Yngwie Malmsteen.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trias_e on February 17, 2005, 08:49:15 AM
What, is there something wrong with liking 'Rising Force'?

......


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 17, 2005, 08:57:01 AM
Nothing wrong with liking Malmsteen, I just think he's a great guitarist who can't write a good song to save his life. He's too caught up in scales and blistering solos to worry about melody, harmony and good hooks.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trias_e on February 17, 2005, 09:02:57 AM
I agree actually, my elipses were more of a contemplation on the probably non-existant possibility of internet sarcasm...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 17, 2005, 09:04:49 AM
Ygnwie was extremely talented, and put on a great live show, too.

But his albums were nothing more than musical masturbation, lacking soul entirely. I wonder if I can still play Black Star...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 17, 2005, 09:13:11 AM
The Oysterhead album consisting of Claypool, Anastasio and Copeland is brilliance. Peart was the wrong example for the arrogant drummer. You should have used Carl Palmer. Brilliant, but prone to excesses that compromise the music.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 17, 2005, 09:28:16 AM
I've got just about everything Les has put to disc :) Oysterhead does indeed rock, there are a couple tracks floating around the net, maybe from the official site or Les's site, leftovers from the studio sessions. Just a couple nice little ditties. Another great disc is the 2 cds (sold seperately) from a live show the Flying Frog Brigade did. First disc is mostly Les and Sausage tunes plus Shine On You Crazy Diamond. Second disc is the entirity of my favorite Pink Floyd album, Animals. I always wanted to play it live in its entirity, Les lived my vision. Pretty cool.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on February 17, 2005, 11:22:17 AM
Quote
Funny thing is...I watched Some Kind of Monster last night, and seeing Cliff always inspires me. I got to the audition scene and was surprised at how many 'big name' bass players (jeordi white, danny lohner, eric avery, etc) just don't have much going on.

I'm glad someone else picked up on this!  I too watched this a few nights ago, and thought the exact same things!

Now I wonder a bit:  those additions happened about 35 miles from where I live, could I have done better than those douchebags?  Could I have gotten a 1 million dollar signing deal, and been granted a red name on F13? :)

Where is the talent today?  Where did all the bass gods go?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 17, 2005, 11:35:04 AM
Well..the thought of what would I have done did occur to me (I was on the wrong coast at the time, anyway). So as they were jamming Seek & Destroy, I picked up my bass and ripped that out, sounding better than everyone but Trujillo (who definitely deserves the job, he totally rocks imo). Then I thought further as to what /I/ would have done, and that's pretty easy: play Anesthesia/Pulling Teeth! I've played that for so many years I have rewritten and extended some sections, it's familiar yet different than the original. And Lars jams through part of it, and I'd bet he doesn't get to sit and jam it out with a creative bass player too much, so it may have been fun for him. The song which follows it on the album was Whiplash, which I never really knew on bass. But I know the song backward and forward, we listened to so much metallica as kids, so I was able to wail out Whiplash, as well.

Then I saw the conference James, Lars, and Kirk had and one thing they were amazed by was Trujillo playing Whiplash with his fingers, and using his index finger as a pick for the sections that are physically impossible to play with traditional alternating fingerpicking, and how they hadn't seen anyone play it like that since Cliff...and I had just set my bass down after doing so. I felt pretty damned good after that, even though I've been focused on guitar. Or maybe because I've been focused on guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 18, 2005, 07:37:30 AM
\Where is the talent today?  Where did all the bass gods go?

Have you seen Bela Fleck and the Flecktones live? Victor Wooten is a GOD. As good as Pastorius ever was.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on February 19, 2005, 03:40:37 AM
Neil Peart is a great drummer. But like you both said, he plays to the song and adds his personality moments TO the song, instead of in spite of the song. Any asshead who wants to be in a band has to learn it isn't all about him and his instrument. Same with Les Claypool. Outstanding bass player, but if he tried to play the Primus type stuff in a Metallica joint, it would totally fuck the song up, because they wouldn't mesh. I don't play anymore, but I at least understand that colloborative projects like bands require compromise on all fronts, or you end up sounding like Yngwie Malmsteen.

Which is why Metallica didn't hire Claypool when he tried out for them after Cliff Burton died.

Also, LOT'S of bands cover thier ears and say "na na na!" the second any drummer says he worships Neil Peart.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 23, 2005, 02:56:03 AM
"slow hand"

Hah! One good thing about having that baritone around: I'm flying on my other guitars now. If I was into shredding, this would be as good a practice technique as any.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 23, 2005, 06:39:47 AM
Speed really isn't much of an issue for me, my first band started on thrash metal. I'm also trying to get in more time on the bass, which is great for finger strength. It's more finger articulation, I'm trying to force myself to re-learn theory. I really hated school and textbooks, so it's been tough going, I learn a couple little things and just start jamming. I can jam for hours on end if I stick to minor and mixolydians, I struggle with everything else. Great for metal, some rock, and blues, but I'd like to master at least major playing as well. Luckily, one thing that did stick from my (years) of theory was fretboard integration, I'm still pretty decent at playing something anywhere on the neck and rusty but still can transpose in realtime.

Got my transposition skills in the theater, oddly enough, playing in the house band for my high school production of Grease. It was so very cool to have a real band playing those rock-n-roll tunes, but our teacher (and my renfaire wench!) insisted on using drama club actors, not singers. So we had to transpose every song to a key the actor was comfortable with. 

I talked with my buddy who I mentioned plays baritones in his duo setup (he has three marketed setups: solo, duo with a drummer, and trio) and I think I might just stick with a standard tuning guitar for now, because I really need a nice guitar and I tend to drift across styles, so I'd be better off with the most versatile instrument, getting the baritone down the road somewhere. I'm extremely good at talking myself out of buying expensive things, I've needed a new guitar for years.

I just need a house of my own a lot more (for a studio I want to build).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on February 23, 2005, 10:36:24 AM
This being the guitar thread, I'll barge in with a request for advice.  My beloved old acoustic guitar seems to be losing its bridge (looks like the pressure from the strings is slowly but surely prying it loose).  Is this something I can remedy myself with commonly available tools (like, say, wood glue), or should I bring it to the guitar hospital and show it to somebody who knows what they're doing?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 23, 2005, 01:12:47 PM
This being the guitar thread, I'll barge in with a request for advice.  My beloved old acoustic guitar seems to be losing its bridge (looks like the pressure from the strings is slowly but surely prying it loose).  Is this something I can remedy myself with commonly available tools (like, say, wood glue), or should I bring it to the guitar hospital and show it to somebody who knows what they're doing?

Yeah, it's doable, but I wouldn't recommend it. Acoustics need a tech's hand moreso than electrics, and it usually won't cost much anyways. Also, they'll find other things to adjust in the process of fixing the bridge, and getting it sounding as good as it can in every aspect (usually for free).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on February 23, 2005, 03:54:54 PM
I'll bring it to a reputable instrumentician then.   :-)  Thanks!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 24, 2005, 06:20:46 AM
Stray, is your sig being dynamically generated?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 24, 2005, 06:39:03 AM
Stray, is your sig being dynamically generated?

Yeah, I'm using the Audioscrobbler plug-in that Big Gulp pointed out (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=2263.0) the other day. Pretty cool.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 07, 2005, 04:57:14 AM
http://cyberjamarchive.com/mp3-uploads/bach-chaconne.mp3

Free music. Bach in Drop D  :-D

Damn, I don't know if I'm crying from the beauty of the song, or the fact that I'll never be this good  :cry:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SirBruce on March 07, 2005, 05:30:56 AM
That's weird; I don't see Stray's sig anymore.

Bruce


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 07, 2005, 05:50:53 AM
I took it off. Just for you  :-o


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 23, 2005, 11:52:36 PM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/Jaguar_HH.jpg)
Jaguar HH

Oh my.

This comes out at just the wrong time too. Just when I thought I had all the humbucking guitars I'd want, Fender comes out with this. I was actually planning on getting another Strat, or a Jazzmaster, but damn, I can't resist. My affinity for old "twangy" guitars is going to have to wait.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 24, 2005, 06:53:52 AM
That's a nice looking guitar, good price on it, too. I like the electronics, some nice options for pickup control. I think I might be going with a standard maple neck strat for my next guitar, I've been playing rosewood (on El Cheapo...hey I have an idea for a new headstock graphic!) necks for a few years now. I kinda wish that guitar had an ebony neck (which is what I've specced for my humbucking guitar, a les paul as of now, but daaamn are they expensive) Back in the day I played maple necks (because I mostly played strats). But I'd like to tap the pickups like that, phase inversion ftw and whatnot.

I'm holding out for the baritone Jag ;) New guitar #3, ETA: 2112, heh. But I'm thinking #1 is the black american hardtail strat, maple neck (I'm no whammy man, I've always taken the bar off and twist the body use the string beyond the nut, or move the bridge itself, etc, I hurt guitars when I play :) Heck, I wear down the thickest picks I can find, too...)

That bach piece was cool, reminds me of being in school. I could never play that cleanly, I've always been more about passion. Well, not always, I used to think Jimmy Page was way too sloppy when I was a kid just starting out, heh. But after going to school to learn how to play classical, I wanted to play dirty. After going to recording school, I wanted to underproduce my sound. I was actually working through a paganini piece I found in a magazine, but I dropped it because really all I do is sit back and wail. I've always found it much better to listen to an hour or so of good classical music and then apply the theory, the structure, but not try to imitate the actual work. Thus my 'improv classical' stuff, which snakes into my blues in an odd way (I mostly do slow minor blues). Tough to pull off without sounding like a wanker showing off, I strive for that balance and it can be really sweet and different.

/ramble


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 24, 2005, 01:25:19 PM
That's a nice looking guitar, good price on it, too. I like the electronics, some nice options for pickup control. I think I might be going with a standard maple neck strat for my next guitar, I've been playing rosewood (on El Cheapo...hey I have an idea for a new headstock graphic!) necks for a few years now. I kinda wish that guitar had an ebony neck (which is what I've specced for my humbucking guitar, a les paul as of now, but daaamn are they expensive) Back in the day I played maple necks (because I mostly played strats). But I'd like to tap the pickups like that, phase inversion ftw and whatnot.

Yeah, I prefer maple necks too. The strats and teles I have now are all maple. But I've always wanted a Fender with a 60's C-Shape neck. The ones with a 7.25 radius. To me, the Fender 60's models are perfect.

All 7.25 C Shaped necks are rosewood though (at least that I know of). The cheapest model with a neck like that is the 60's reissue Strat and the Jaguar HH above. Further up, the vintage Jags and the Jazzmaster. Further up from that, the "relic" and "NOS" models. And of course, further up from that, a real 60's model. All rosewood though. The only way I can get a 60's shape neck with maple is through the custom shop (and one day I'll get just that!...I just need more.....money).

Anyways, I don't prefer rosewood, but I don't hate it either. I just have to accept my options. For now, I was in the market for either the 60's reissue (Mex made guitar, but to me, those things feel better than many of their expensive American models), or I was going to throw down for a Jazzmaster (which I've ALWAYS wanted, but end up talking my self out of for one reason or another).

The Jags, on the other hand, have never been what I want out of a Fender. The short scale of a Gibson = one of the more un-Fender-like guitars they make. To top it off, these new ones have humbuckers and no tremolo bar. The thing that's appealing to me here is the looks!

I really should be talking myself out of this. Heh.

I dunno. I still want to get it, but I just know I'll regret it sooner or later. I already have a Gibson and an Ibanez (and that Schecter baritone as well). I really don't need another "hot" guitar. I barely play the ones I have.

Which brings me to another thing: I've been "experimenting" too much lately. Nothing wrong with that, of course, but it really isn't getting me anywhere. It's just for kicks....but it ends up costing me. I'm starting to realize that my best playing is always going to come through with single coils. That Fender "quack" sound. Same goes for what I prefer to listen to. While I love players like Angus, Townsend, B.B. King, Iommi, Page, and metal guitarists in general, I worship players like Jimi, Keith Richards, SRV, Dick Dale, and Tom Verlaine (and if you haven't heard Tom, go out and get the Television album Marquee Moon. He's subtle, and not necessarily "rockin'", but it's beautiful nonetheless).

Anywho...I didn't realize you were into Fenders as well. Cool deal, man. "Hardtail" or not  :-P

Quote
Thus my 'improv classical' stuff, which snakes into my blues in an odd way (I mostly do slow minor blues). Tough to pull off without sounding like a wanker showing off, I strive for that balance and it can be really sweet and different.

I'm kinda the same way, but I'm not exactly sure to what extent I'm using the minor scale. I know jack about theory. I wish I did. Someone told me once that I'm messing around in mixolydian...But I don't even know that means. As far as injecting bluesy stuff into "classical" type improv playing, I know that I'm bringing blues technique into that style (i.e. bends and the like), but really, it's not the blues either :-)

To make it even more confusing, if I'm playing classical sounding stuff, I came up with a weird tuning to play it in (I doubt I really "came up" with it actually. I'm sure it's listed somewhere, but I did find it intuitively on my own).  D-A-D-G-A#-D --- Basically, Keith Richards' or Open G slide tuning, except with the B string tuned to A#. With the way I tune it, one finger bar chords are in minor instead of major. Not bluesy like Open G at all, but it's still pretty interesting.

Overall, I kind of suck at "real" classical or blues. I've been playing for about 15 years now, and I've gotten pretty good at this "other thing" I'm doing though. It makes sense musically, that much I know, but I'm not sure how to identify scales and modes. There's some classical melody in my tunes, some blues and jazz technique, applied through the freakout aesthetics of Jazz horn players like Coltrane/Davis, with the "twangy" sounds of Dick Dale and Duane Eddy. Heh. That's all I know. I've tried learning theory from time to time, but without a teacher, it isn't easy.

Rhythm wise: Whatever works, I guess!  :wink: I usually prefer single note melodies in my rhythms rather than strumming chords though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on March 25, 2005, 01:39:01 AM

I'm kinda the same way, but I'm not exactly sure to what extent I'm using the minor scale. I know jack about theory. I wish I did. Someone told me once that I'm messing around in mixolydian...But I don't even know that means. As far as injecting bluesy stuff into "classical" type improv playing, I know that I'm bringing blues technique into that style (i.e. bends and the like), but really, it's not the blues either :-)


The Mixolydian mode is basically the major scale, with a flat 7th interval.  But it does matter what chord you play it over.  If you're playing over a C chord, you play C D E F G A Bb.  However, if you are playing over,say, a I IV V progression, you can't play those same notes and have it be "mixolydian" the whole time; you have to change with the chord changes(C D E F G A Bb/ F G A Bb C D Eb/G A B C D E F).

I'm no expert in the area of modes (in fact, I suspect someone will correct something I posted above).  But be aware, there is a TON of misinformation when it comes to modal teachings aimed at guitar players.  Most books will tell you that modal playing is a matter of the note you start and end on (Ionian = C D E F G A B C, Dorian = D E F G A B C D, Phrygian = E F G A B C D E, etc), but this is flat out WRONG.  What really matters is what chord you are playing a certain scale over.  That is what gives you the modal sound.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2005, 06:49:52 AM
Modes are merely an expression of scalar intervals. Ionian = Major, for instance. That's why mixolydian is 'basically' the major scale, with a slightly different interval. I remember my theory book having the modes written out on the inside cover (by me, I was in a Leonardo DV phase), and it was like:

Mode name: 1-1-1/2-1-1-1/2-1
Mode name: 1-1/2-1-1-1/2-1-1
etc

(and this is a little spotty, because I last took theory in college over ten years ago, heh...I can look up the true answer if you'd like with each mode and it's intervals, I still have my old theory book at home somewhere)

Right now I'm just using a mode of convinience, the B mixolydian over the E minor. It has all the notes of the E minor scale, played on a B tonal center. It's my 'stock' metal riffing material, the stuff I was using for my improv metal nights at an open mic club last summer. I'm pretty tired of it's restrictions, though. But I'm insane inside those scales, total fretboard mastery, so I tend to fall back on 'em for freedom of playing. Kinda ironic, limiting yet freedom as far as playing in any position within those limits.
Quote
I usually prefer single note melodies in my rhythms rather than strumming chords though.
I don't have any preference, I try not to, intentionally. I like all kinds of stuff, from palm-muted stuff, single and chords, to strummy acoustic stuff. I try to always keep it interesting, with walking bass lines, passing tones, little independant melodies, chord inversions, etc. That's really where I am right now, chops coming back and moving on to more advanced stuff and trying to get the theory down once again.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 25, 2005, 12:44:55 PM
Thanks for the explanations. Except...err...I still don't get it.

Could either of you two recommend a book on scales and modes? Preferably, one that assumes no prior knowledge or experience with music notation and theory. Something geared more towards guitars and fretboard patterns, and has lots of pretty little pictures.

Everything I've learned up to this point has been by ear or imitation (and by "imitation" I don't mean cover songs or whatnot. I just mean by learning patterns and techniques by listening to other guitarists). I think I've got a pretty good intuitive sense on what kinds of notes I should mashing together, but it's not uncommon for me to hit those "sour" notes when I'm trying to improvise. Sometimes those sour notes turn out to be not so bad at all, and simply take me into a new direction. Most of time though, they just fuck up a song. I'd like to get to the point where I know exactly what I'm doing. Where accidents (at least the bad kind) never happen.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2005, 01:40:56 PM
I'm working with this book (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0825821711/qid=1111785826/sr=8-1/ref=pd_csp_1/002-5409200-1240800?v=glance&s=books&n=507846) right now. It's a series and I'll probably check out the others, it's fairly well done. It has almost no prose in it, but a gajillion scales in tab. I also got a little gig bag book of chords which is nowhere near as extensive as I want, as I said, I'll probably get the guitar grimoire version. I like to work on scales and chord progressions concurrently, and build chords straight from scale tones, but at some point I need to work more on standard chording, too.

It's been a pain, since I'm really just getting back into theory, but it's fun when things fall back into place, and I'm glad I'm doing it, because it's a lot more satisfying knowing the individual notes in each chord, because then it's so much easier to build things up from there.

I can totally empathize with hitting sour notes during improv, it's to be expected from anyone but a true master. But that's why I'd been sticking to the safety net of my minor scales, which I can improv anywhere with almost zero sour notes. Like I said, it makes me feel like a newbler when I play anything else, heh. But there's a funny sense of dedication that brings out in me...because I can play a blistering full neck minor run and then struggle with some basic patterns or scales I'm not used to, makes me want to get as good at those as I am with the minor stuff. I'm intentionally revisiting a lot of problem areas from when I first learned to play, I skipped alot because it wasn't relevant to the music I was playing at the time, which let me get good a lot faster than if I had done things 'properly'.

And don't knock the ...For Dummies series, it's been damn good on just about any topic I can think of, guitar is no exception. I'm actually using it, as well. Mostly as a springboard, but also as a nice review of some basic techniques across a variety of styles. Your local library probably has it or can get it for you, the copy I am using is from work (the library).

Thinking about it...I think I can trace this whole renewed interest in major scales and whotnat to a single lick, I was listening to some minor blues and they kept using a cool major passing tone. Rather than just cop that one lick, I wanted to learn how to mix and match scales like that on my own, so I'm not so stratified. And of course, at speed in real-time, because I'm hell-bent on becoming an improv player (first time around the focus was on writing and structure).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 25, 2005, 05:07:58 PM
Thanks. I've seen those Grimoire books around for years. They've always seemed a bit daunting to me, but maybe I should just dive in. After all, it's a better way to devote my time than with a lot of other things.


Slightly off topic:

You want to hear something sad? Jimi Hendrix only played for 11 years of his life.

What gives? I could devote all my time to music education for the rest of my life, and at the ripe age of 70, I'd probably say to myself: "You've gotten pretty good over the years, haven't you? But you know what? Compared to Jimi, you still suck!" Heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on March 25, 2005, 08:03:05 PM
Here's how I think of modes:

Modes are just ways of playing scales with different intervals inbetween certain notes.  You can memorize the patterns on a fret board then you can play any mode in any key, by selecting a different starting note.

If you write the notes of a scale, you can see the starting notes for each of the seven modes, in a particular key.  Let's do the Key of C:

C - Ionian
D - Dorian
E - Phyrgian
F - Lydian
G - Mixolydian
A - Aeolian
B - Locrian

All seven of these modes are based on the key of C, thus contain the same notes as the C scale.

If we use the example above (from Sky) of the E minor scale, we have the following:

E - Ionian
F# - Dorian
G - Phrygian
A - Lydian
B - Mixolydian
C# - Aeolian
D# - Locrian

Hence we can see that for the Mixolydian mode, we are actually playing notes from the E minor scale (as was pointed out by Sky above).  Since a lot of metal is based around the E power chord, you will see a lot of riffing around the minor modes, which are B Mixolydian and G Phrygian (the two most common).

The modes follow a set number of intervals from the root note of the key (or tonic note).  They all follow the same pattern:

Ionian - based on major scale
Dorian - based on major scale one whole step below tonic
Phrygian - based on major scale two whole tones below tonic (major third)
Lydian - based on major scale 5 half steps below tonic (major 4th)
Mixolydian - based on major scale a perfect 5th below tonic (6 semi tones)
Aeolian - based on major scale one whole step above tonic
Locrian - based on major scale one third above tonic

So if someone says "play an C Mixolydian scale", you count a perfect 5th below that note, which would be F (so this would be based on notes in the F major scale).  So a solo based on the C Mixolydian scale would be appropriate for certain songs in the K of F (provided the scale fit the intended mood of the piece).

We don't tend to think of modes since as guitarists we play chromatic instruments.  This means we can play every semi-tome (or half step) starting from the low E up to the high E two octaves up.  Older instruments, like dulcimers, were tuned to major scales, so you really had to think about modes when the key of the song was changed!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 26, 2005, 12:19:25 AM
We don't tend to think of modes since as guitarists we play chromatic instruments.  This means we can play every semi-tome (or half step) starting from the low E up to the high E two octaves up.  Older instruments, like dulcimers, were tuned to major scales, so you really had to think about modes when the key of the song was changed!

Hmm...There's a recent thread goin' on at Harmony Central about this actually. I'm finding some of it interesting (even though I don't quite understand it all).

"Do you think modally or in terms of superimposing a scale?" (http://acapella.harmony-central.com/forums/showthread.php?s=ea91e39c0088c259adbca2498101c630&threadid=891092)

Quote
My teacher and I sort of have an ongoing debate about this. He'll say play a Ab melodic minor over a G altered dominant chord. I'll say 'oh you mean G super locrian.' He'll say fine you learn your 21 scales and I'll learn my 3. But in my case I know that the #5 of the super locrian scale will also be the #5 of the chord I'm playing it over, while he has to remember that the 5th of the Ab melodic minor is the #5 of of the chord. On the other hand there are situations where the scale you would superimpose doesn't have the chords root in it. Then there's no mode.

Some of the thread is too technical for me, but it seems like many guitarists think in terms of modes.


Also, this guy derailed a bit, but I thought he made a cool point:

Quote
Once you can feel the intervals in your fingers, you don't NEED to think - thinking melodically, diatonically, whatever, it all just gets in the way. Scales and modes are, to me, all about training your fingers. Arpeggios are extremely important because they train you to play certain intervals, and different modes incorporate all sorts of weird intervals in their arpeggios.

But the most important thing is: This is NOT NECESSARY (oh, playing chromatically through the entire range of the guitar in different positions can actually help - if you do this a lot when you're bored, you will become more intuitively connected with your instrument) [...] Eventually all that playing will make you fluent in music exactly the same as you probably/most likely/heck/definitely are with your spoken native language.

I guess it's much the same as how babies babble to learn different ways of shaping the mouth and tongue to form various syllables, and then they instinctively learn how to piece them together to create meaning, and eventually words (i guess this is partially why practicing riffs is another way to sound a lot better with a minimal amount of effort). The more I play nowadays, it seems, thinking along these lines, improvisation gets easier and easier, and the only thing holding me back from truly exploring what I feel musically is my own technical limitations - which can all be remedied simply by playing more. Improvisation can teach itself just as well as any method, at least in my humble and fairly uneducated opinion.

A book for a linguistics class I took [...] called The Language Instinct by Stephen Pinker [...] describes how people acquire language, in terms of what modern science percieves [...] It seems to me that the ability to play music in a way that is "natural" comes the same way the ability to speak a language comes ... although certainly without as much ease unless you either work very hard or begin at a younger age.

As obvious as it is, I've never given much thought on the similarities between spoken language and music. I mean, how much does one have to understand about their language in order to convey a powerful message?

Really, not much at all.

I think the examples are endless, so I'm not going to bother listing any here. I will say, however, that a George Carlin can stir up a crowd long before a William F. Buckley could even make an impression. Doesn't the same apply to music to an extent? Or any art for that matter?

Anyways, it's slightly off point and all that, but it's interesting to me. I'm still going to devote more time to learning more, but I think "reaching one's potential" with music is an entirely different thing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 26, 2005, 08:16:28 PM
I mentioned Tom Verlaine earlier, so I thought I'd post this. Bootleg quality, but still...

His quirky singing style may not be for everyone, but IMO, this is some of the best guitar playing ever put to tape: Little Johnny Jewel (http://home.satx.rr.com/dasnake/music/Little_Johnny_Jewel.mp3) (27 MB)

The second solo, 7 and 1/2 minutes in, kicks my ass every time.

Kind of a shame what happened to punk after the 70's. It pretty much became synonymous with lack of skill on one's instrument, and vanity, when in the beginning it was just about putting the balls back into Rock.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on March 27, 2005, 02:17:05 PM
Thanks for the explanations. Except...err...I still don't get it.


Try this exercise I got from a Joe Satriani article and it should help you get it.  It will show you that a mode is a certain sound and not just a series of notes with a certain beginning or ending, as many other sources suggest.

Use your low E string as an open drone.  Strike it and then play the E Major scale (starting on on the 7th fret of the A string is probably the easiest position); that's your E Ionian.

Next, strike the drone again, and while it is ringing, play the D major scale over it.  This is D Dorian, and it has a b3 and b7 (compared to the E Ionian).

Then play the drone and a C Major over it.  This is C Phrygian.  The Phrygian mode has a b2, b3, b6 and b7.  Remember that E Ioninan is E F# G# A B C# D# E and C Major is C D E F G A B C, so if you flat the 2, 3, 6 and 7 in E Ionian, you get the C Major scale (this same idea applies to all the modes).

I'm not going to take you through all the modes, but you should get the idea and hear the sounds.  A good thing to help you is memorizing the circle of fifths.  If you know that the Lydian mode has 1 sharp (the 4th) and you are playing over E, you can just add 1 sharp to the "key signature", to go from E to B. 

E F# G# A B C# D#

to

B C# D# E F# G# A# B

The progression of sharps and flats is always the same in the circle of fifths.  So if flatting some notes leaves you with 2 sharps, you know the mode you end up with will be a D and it will have the notes D E F# G A B C# D, no matter what mode it is.  The circle of fifths makes it easy to do "musical arithmetic" by just adding sharps or flats to the key signature.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on March 27, 2005, 03:17:28 PM

So if someone says "play an C Mixolydian scale", you count a perfect 5th below that note, which would be F (so this would be based on notes in the F major scale).  So a solo based on the C Mixolydian scale would be appropriate for certain songs in the K of F (provided the scale fit the intended mood of the piece).

What's interesting is reading guitar boards and seeing all the different ways people use to think these things out and the little mental devices they use to make them work.

Since I come at it from the circle of fifths angle, when I think Mixolydian, I think "1 flat".  Since C major has no sharps or flats, adding one flat to it gives me the key signature of F Major.  If I was to play D Mixolydian, I'd add one flat (aka, subtract a sharp) and end up with 1 sharp in the "key signature", which means G Major.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on March 28, 2005, 11:58:09 AM
Quote
What's interesting is reading guitar boards and seeing all the different ways people use to think these things out and the little mental devices they use to make them work.

Yes, I find this interesting as well.

For me, it made more sense to think of modes as positional entities.  Like in thinking of how I changed frets within a scale in order to play a different mode.

If you look online, you'll find fret board charts for each mode (http://www.theguitarsuite.com/modepositions.html) that will show you the pattern that each mode follows.  So I know for example that if I want to play C Mixolydian scale, you just select the starting position and follow the pattern.  Also notice that the circle of fifths follows a sepcific pattern on a fretboard too!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on March 28, 2005, 10:11:19 PM
Quote
What's interesting is reading guitar boards and seeing all the different ways people use to think these things out and the little mental devices they use to make them work.

Yes, I find this interesting as well.

For me, it made more sense to think of modes as positional entities.  Like in thinking of how I changed frets within a scale in order to play a different mode.

If you look online, you'll find fret board charts for each mode (http://www.theguitarsuite.com/modepositions.html) that will show you the pattern that each mode follows.  So I know for example that if I want to play C Mixolydian scale, you just select the starting position and follow the pattern.  Also notice that the circle of fifths follows a sepcific pattern on a fretboard too!

I try to stay away from fretboard patterns and think in terms of notes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on March 29, 2005, 05:27:10 PM
If I put together some quick MP3 clips of the various modes played over a basic root chord (like an E power chord used in rock or metal), would anyone be interested in hearing them here on F13?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 29, 2005, 05:56:23 PM
If I put together some quick MP3 clips of the various modes played over a basic root chord (like an E power chord used in rock or metal), would anyone be interested in hearing them here on F13?

Heh. You might want to pm one of the admins. I'm not sure if they even look at this thread.

Oh, and btw, if possible, can you give me a brief idea of what the guitarist is doing in that song I posted above (Little Johnny Jewel)? I'm just curious. He was originally a classically trained pianist, then moved to free jazz on saxophones. According to him, he didn't even care about guitars until he was older (he called them "twee" -- whatever that means) -- but I'll be damned if I could find a better guitar player that I could name as my personal favorite (he completely restored my faith in lead playing, at a time when I considered guitars to be a bit "twee" myself).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 05, 2005, 12:14:23 PM
Miguel, we really should start posting some little snippets, that would be cool. For me personally, I'd like to record something polished for once, I usually just throw down some ideas for future exploration and never revisit them. I was listening through my clips a while back when I put in a new hd, sometimes the same idea will crop up several months later in some odd morphed form, I'm actually building a song out of three of those clips. My obstacle is that I grew up (literally, from age 14) as half of a songwriting duo. Get some ideas cooked up, throw it on tape, then bounce it off my singer and we work to arrange and fill out the ideas and put lyrics to it. It's crushing trying to do it alone, imo.

Wish I wasn't saving for a house, a new guitar and a Digi002 would go a long ways in helping me record more easily... :)

(downloading that song now)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on April 05, 2005, 03:49:01 PM
Quote
Miguel, we really should start posting some little snippets, that would be cool.

My PC has been apart for the past few weeks so I haven't had access to any of my recording gear.  I've been converting it with a new power supply, fans, vid card coolers, etc in order to silence it.  It was getting distracting trying to record songs in the same room as a PC that sounded like a 12 HP leafblower on gardening day.

My mic pre is on loan ATM, but if you all don't mind listening to direct recordings of guitar I should be able to throw a sample clip together by this weekend.  I'll host in on my own website and link it here.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 06, 2005, 11:22:47 AM
Wish I wasn't saving for a house, a new guitar and a Digi002 would go a long ways in helping me record more easily... :)

You might want to look into getting a ProTools MIX system. Hell of a lot better and slightly cheaper than Digi002's, M-Audio, and the like. The only reason they're cheap is that Digidesign moved on to HD for their Pro systems. But they'll still do everything an 002 can do (and more). You might even getting lucky and end up paying half than you would for something new.

On the subject of guitars, I ended up getting ordering one of these over the weekend:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/jazzmaster.jpg)

Really cheap too ($300). Mine's white. I was going to settle on a Am. Vintage reissue, but I found this used Made in Japan model (usually these still run $600 or so, but I don't think the dealer knew wtf he was doing). I ended saving about a grand. All I have to do now is upgrade the pups ($100 for a pair) and I'll be happy with it. Hopefully this will subside the G.A.S.

Did you find a method to Verlaine's madness btw? I read that he used the Bop Scale a lot (from his Sax experience), but I'm not sure to what extent and whatnot.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 07, 2005, 09:23:03 AM
If I put together some quick MP3 clips of the various modes played over a basic root chord (like an E power chord used in rock or metal), would anyone be interested in hearing them here on F13?

PM Shockeye and Schild. I have no problem with it, but Shockeye's the one who'd have to put them up.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: schild on April 07, 2005, 09:24:34 AM
No need to PM Me, I'm all good with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 08, 2005, 08:57:28 AM
Quote
Hell of a lot better and slightly cheaper than Digi002's, M-Audio, and the like.
But the control surfaces = $$$. The reason I'm thinking the 002 is the motorized control surface that is included. Otherwise, I'd just go with an m-box and do stereo recordings.

To the admins:
Quote
I'll host in on my own website and link it here.
Reading comprehension is HARD ;)

I wub u 2.
Quote
Did you find a method to Verlaine's madness btw?
That was a great piece, their live album is up on my fye wishlist now :) My ears are out of shape, I couldn't tell you what he was playing over the top. If he's anything like me, though, he's not sticking to any particular thing, but just using whatever occurs to him as he's jamming. I'd like to get to the point where I can play 100% by ear, it's insanely difficult for me for some reason, but I do practice just closing my eyes and humming melodies, then play them on guitar. Good for the ear and the technique (but I'm pretty crappy at it, heh).

Got out to the local Fender dealer (I've known the manager for years). The only maple neck strat they had was the 50th Ann. gold-tone model, with the U neck. I've always played C necks, so it was like playing a baseball bat. Felt odd. Then when I got home, I noticed I arch my hand a lot, and there is room for a U neck in there, so I'm thinking I might spend some more time playing that one next week when I go up there. Downside is the garbage truss rod system, it's like the vintage models, you have to take the neck off to adjust the truss, but he showed me a cool trick - put a capo at the base of the neck and leave the strings on. Still, a pita. A nice bonus - he said they could get in any Fenders I was interested in (slowly, a few at a time) so I could try them out, no obligations.

Gave me some crazy gore-tex strings, they are supposed to keep that 'new string' feel forever. They are super slick, nice in a way, but I actually prefer playing on dead strings, I think. I like the rough texture and extra grippiness for bending. Totally weird.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 08, 2005, 09:40:50 AM
That was a great piece, their live album is up on my fye wishlist now :)

My guess is you're talking about the Blow Up, which is where that version of Little Johnny Jewel is from.

Anyways, yeah, great album, but fair warning: He's struggles a lot with vocals live. LJJ is one of the exceptions, for some reason. They're all great songs though....But most of them make better sense after listening to Marquee Moon imho. Marquee Moon = Best dual guitar album ever  :-D

Also, I have every "unreleased" live performance if you're ever interested.

Quote
My ears are out of shape, I couldn't tell you what he was playing over the top. If he's anything like me, though, he's not sticking to any particular thing, but just using whatever occurs to him as he's jamming.

Yeah, I'm the same way. But like I said earlier, I tend to hit those sour notes often. Trying to educate myself lately though. I ordered that book you suggested as well.
 
Quote
Got out to the local Fender dealer (I've known the manager for years). The only maple neck strat they had was the 50th Ann. gold-tone model, with the U neck. I've always played C necks, so it was like playing a baseball bat. Felt odd. Then when I got home, I noticed I arch my hand a lot, and there is room for a U neck in there, so I'm thinking I might spend some more time playing that one next week when I go up there. Downside is the garbage truss rod system, it's like the vintage models, you have to take the neck off to adjust the truss, but he showed me a cool trick - put a capo at the base of the neck and leave the strings on. Still, a pita. A nice bonus - he said they could get in any Fenders I was interested in (slowly, a few at a time) so I could try them out, no obligations.

C Neck guy here too. The old 60's "chunky C" though....Which would be mean Vintage models or reissues. I don't like the truss rod adjustment on those either, but I figure it's a tradeoff. That Jazzmaster I just got is the same way as well.

As for the arch in your hand, have you ever tried V Necks? Sounds like that may work, without it being too big.

Quote
Gave me some crazy gore-tex strings, they are supposed to keep that 'new string' feel forever. They are super slick, nice in a way, but I actually prefer playing on dead strings, I think. I like the rough texture and extra grippiness for bending. Totally weird.

I strung up some Elixers on a couple guitars recently, which are similar. I'll keep 'em on the acoustic and the baritone (which needs as much brightness to it that it can get), but I already took them off the other electrics. Pure Nickel all the way. Only problem is that I have to order them all the time, as the stores around here never carry them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 08, 2005, 12:17:09 PM
Quote
Marquee Moon = Best dual guitar album ever
You better smiley that shit! Priest, Allmans, Maiden, Mercyful Fate, Skynyrd, etc etc ad nauseum :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 08, 2005, 12:51:32 PM
Quote
Marquee Moon = Best dual guitar album ever
You better smiley that shit! Priest, Allmans, Maiden, Mercyful Fate, Skynyrd, etc etc ad nauseum :)

Heh, the smiley was just another way of saying "imho".  :wink:

It's much different from what those other bands are doing though (by virtue of Verlaine...Lloyd is the more rock oriented guy), that it's probably not even wise for me to make a comparison. There's also a subtle difference in how the guitars accompany each other -- instead of dualing and trading off each other with leads, Lloyd and Verlaine dual and layer over each other more in the rhythms. Like violin players would, for example, and not like guitar duos (or trios etc.) usually do. Plus, they play mostly in clean settings, which sets it apart somewhat.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 08, 2005, 02:02:14 PM
Ok, then. I'll pull out the big gun (http://shop.fye.com/product.aspx?sku=60108226&loc=50244).

Best guitar album EVER. Period. You must own this. If you do not, you know what to do.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 08, 2005, 03:33:59 PM
Ok, then. I'll pull out the big gun (http://shop.fye.com/product.aspx?sku=60108226&loc=50244).

Best guitar album EVER. Period. You must own this. If you do not, you know what to do.

I don't have that one, but those three are some of my favorites. McLaughlin in particular. I'll take note.  :-)

As for Marquee Moon, it's not anywhere near that territory. The only one who plays like that is Lloyd, and his acrobatics are kept to a minimum (he does let loose on the Matthew Sweet albums though). It's not a virtuoso guitar album by any means. It's romantic through and through.

I always liked the ending of that movie Crossroads (not the Britney Spears version!), because it makes that distinction between the two types of musicians. I don't really think Ry Cooder could own Steve Vai like the movie portrays though. I think they're equal -- just completely different, and can't be measured against each other.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 11, 2005, 04:36:46 PM
Hell, I like Crossroads for a bevy of reasons, as a blues fan/musician. Robert Johnson is the father of modern rock music, imo, since everyone from Clapton to Pagey (hell, half the early Zep tunes were Johnson's) to the friggin' Blues Brothers movie (Sweet Home Chicago). Ry Cooder doing the music was just sweet, way underrated player. Having Vai during his (arguable) peak was great, too.

But it's even more personal for me now, because I feel it represents my own internal struggle of the classically trained shredder (such as my skills are now) against the feel player I'm growing into. I'd rather master a single bend than an arpeggio these days, and holding back the shred so it doesn't taint the music is damned hard (as in I can't seem to yet, heh).

Then again, I listen to a guy like Johnny Winter, who can shred tastefully through an entire SET, let alone a single solo. Put in some ear time with a couple of his live mid-70s albums, I love the guy. If I can't downplay my tendency to shred, I hope to channel it into this style. He uses a lot of lick-based stuff, too, which makes it easier and fun (less to remember :)).

And I do think Cooder could pwn Vai, because Vai lacks a certain soul (imo). That's what gives Cooder (who has great chops) the edge, Vai has great technique, and even great melodicity, but not very good feel. When I was a young woodchuck in shredding school, I always thought Jimmy Page was /sloppy/. Took me years before I came to appreciate the rough edges and despise overly clean studio work (which then led to many heated debates as I was in recording school at the height of ultra clean recordings...). Partly why I prefer live albums today.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on April 12, 2005, 11:44:33 AM
Some more details on modes and scales.

I discussed this topic (modes and scales, and how we decide which one to use in any given situation) with my bandmates and several interesting things came out.

First, a common practice for guitar players to learn modes is to memorize the fretboard patterns that are associated with each mode.  For example, check out this link:

Fret patterns for all seven modes (http://www.theguitarsuite.com/modepositions.html)

So if you know the root of the mode you wish to play (for example, C Dorian), then you align the root of the pattern with that root note (in this case, C), then you follow that pattern and out comes the scale!

The reason this method works well for guitar players is that it goes very well with matching a mode with any given key on the fly.  If I know I am playing a C7 chord, and I want to solo using a Mixolydian scale, then I know I want to play in the G Mixolydian mode.  I align the pattern to the root (in this case G), and away I go.

The problem with this method is that you need to learn at seven fretboard patterns!  And of course this does not even completely cover all the minor variations that one can play in a given situation.

However there's another way to think about it.  As I said before, all modes are based on major scales.  All scales are relatable by the circle of fifths, by adding sharps and flats to any major scale you can get to any mode.

Hence if you learn the pattern for the Ionian (or major) mode/scale, you automatically know the pattern to every mode possible!  All that is required is to know the major scale any given mode is based on, then you play that scale starting on a different note and you have the exact same modes as the patterns above dictate.  However in this case, I only need to memorize two patterns (one for starting on the low E string, and another for starting on the A string).  However these two patterns are based on the common Ionian scale (look at the first pattern on the link above to play the major scale).

Using this second method is much easier from a memorization point of view, however we now have to think about what major scale each mode in any given key is based on.  We can do this fairly easily by remembering how many steps in the major scale we need to move down from the root of the chord we are playing.

Let's set up a hypothetical situation where we want to solo over a plain E power chord.  Our song is in E minor, so we get the following notes for the scale (this is the E natural minor scale, which is a major scale with flat 3rd, 6th, and 7th notes):

E natural minor scale:

E - Root
D - Flatted seventh
C - Flatted sixth
B - Fifth
A - Forth
G - Minor Third
F# - Second
E - Root

We know for a fact that all of these notes are 'good' notes for soloing, which means we can solo using the E natural minor scale.

However there are seven modes which we could theoretically play over this chord and would 'work out' (in the sense that the notes may be legal, but the scale may not fit the intended mood of the piece).

E - Ionian
E - Dorian
E - Phrygian
E - Lydian
E - Mixolydian
E - Aeolian
E - Locrian

Some of these modes we can throw out right away.  Since our song is in E minor, we should stick to the 'minor' modes, and not play any of the 'major' modes (since that major third would be dissonent with the minor third the song is based on.  Also, the flatted seveth would not match!).  The major modes would also be too 'happy' to go along with a song in a minor key.

If you look at this link (http://www.mandolincafe.com/niles2.html), you'll see that we have four modes that are based on minor scale progressions:  Dorian, Phrygian, Locrian, and Aeolian.  So these we already know are going to be good choices for soloing in the key of E minor.

So based on the information above, I know I have four potential modes I can choose from, and I know that they have to be based on major scales.  I know the Ionian scale pattern by heart so I'm now ready to play my solo!  All I need to figure out now is what scale each mode is based on!

From my previous post, you'll see that the different modes can be related to major scale using the following pattern:

Ionian - based on major scale
Dorian - based on major scale one whole step below tonic
Phrygian - based on major scale two whole tones below tonic
Lydian - based on major scale 5 half steps below tonic
Mixolydian - based on major scale a perfect 5th above tonic
Aeolian - based on major scale one whole step above tonic
Locrian - based on major scale one third above tonic

If I super-impose these two patterns, here's what I get:

E natural minor scale:

E - Root - Ionian
D - Flatted seventh - Dorian
C - Flatted sixth - Phygian
B - Fifth - Lydian
A - Forth - Mixolydian
G - Minor Third - Aeolian
F# - Second - Locrian

So now I'm really close to the answer!  Let me throw away the 'major' modes, and I'm left with the following:

D - Flatted seventh - Dorian
C - Flatted sixth - Phygian
G - Minor Third - Aeolian
F# - Second - Locrian

So we have:

I want to solo in E Dorian, I play a D major scale starting on E.
I want to solo in E Phyrgian, I play a C major scale starting on E.
I want to solo in E Aeolian, I play a G major scale starting on E.
I want to solo in E Locrian, I play a F# (or Gb) major scale starting on E.

I now have the all the scales I need in order to solo in this key.

I am going to do my backing tracks and make some MP3 clips of all these scales in the comnig week and post in this thread so you can hear what I am talking about.

Stay tuned!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on April 12, 2005, 04:55:49 PM
The note you start on doesn't matter; that's just a bit of misinformation that has creeped into guitar lore.  Just play the right major scale and you will be playing the right mode.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 12, 2005, 05:00:05 PM
Screw patterns.  Just learn your scales and learn how they are constructed.  Patterns are a major roadblock that guitar players use as a crutch.

Did you guys teach yourselves? God, I've tried off and on since the time I started strumming, and just can't get a grasp on it. Patterns (and a good ear) are so much easier, and it's never been a roadblock for me.

I wouldn't mind learning more, but would I be better off getting an instructor?

Edit:

Also, would you guys indulge me a little and talk about gear and songwriting (as opposed to shredding) every once in a while?  I feel so left out with all this talk about scales and modes.   :-P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 13, 2005, 07:00:46 AM
Don't feel too bad. I don't have that level of theory any more. It was a nice refresher for me, too. As I've said, I'm much more of a feel player now. An instructor is always a good idea, no matter your level of playing. Randy Rhoades took classes in every city he played, iirc. I've been keeping my ear to the ground to find a decent instructor here that's not a long drive, but I mostly just self-teach. I had theory in high school and college, but that was 15 years ago and I had set the guitar down for 10 of those years.

But I can't say much about gear, because I'm not a gear guy. When I was at the Fender shop the other day my buddy was laughing at me, he's way into gear (well, he does work at the fender shop!). For me, it's all about playing and making whatever you play through sound good, because when I was learning, all we had were crap amps. So I had to make those amps sound better, and that's where technique comes in (to a certain extent, some amps just sound bad).
Quote
The note you start on doesn't matter; that's just a bit of misinformation that has creeped into guitar lore. 
Right. That's why I can so easily play a B Mixolydian because it's the E minor scale started on a B. There are several ways to approach modes, as evidenced by this thread, heh. None are "wrong". Besides, all this talk of everything being based on major scale is funny to me, because I'm terrrible at playing major scale leads :) That's why my personal way of looking at modes is simply intervals. Because that's what modes are to me, an expression of intervals across an octave.

I like to focus on intervals partly because that's how I was taught in school. We'd be given a key signature and told to transcribe music by ear, and intervallic listening is essential. We spent a lot of time on training the ear to hear different intervals, and even with as much as I've forgotten and/or atrophied over the years, it's still the core of my playing. Whenever I'm successful playing what I hear in my head, it's because I'm almost 'transcribing' it, and intervals are how I transcribe (or used to, heh). I guess learning all the scales would be a huge boon, but I'm not all that disciplined these days :) So I learn little sections off intervals and then transpose it around the neck, after a while I have a decent mental map for that "sound", like a spanish sound, f'rinstance. I don't worry about the scales so much as playing the right intervals to make the "sound" or "flavor". Hard to explain, I guess.

Songwriting...that makes me cry. Miss my old songwriting partner, but I have been penning a few more tunes lately. Started one last night called Backstabbin' Blues, going to use it to write a more elaborate fingerpicking song than I've done in a while, I think. Songwriting is tough as hell, or easy as pie. My band's best songs were alternately written in the time it takes to play it, or broken down and restructured over the course of months to make an epic. Sometimes we'd have a concept we'd write to, sometimes we'd have a riff we'd have to make a concept for. Sometimes I'd be futzing with effects and stumble across something, because I always tried to write parts that fit effects when I was in futzing mode.

Hell, let's talk about pentatonics, I play them too much anyway! :) That's what has actually spurred my reinterest in learning some scales, the multitude of variations on the pentatonic scales I play leave holes when I try to do more styles of blues, and I used to suck at 7th chords. It's funny because they are so easy...and I remember them by an interval, actually (by remembering to play one interval down from the higher octave root, one or two steps depending on chord quality)! :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samprimary on April 13, 2005, 07:27:32 AM
I always liked the ending of that movie Crossroads (not the Britney Spears version!), because it makes that distinction between the two types of musicians. I don't really think Ry Cooder could own Steve Vai like the movie portrays though. I think they're equal -- just completely different, and can't be measured against each other.

Vai played everything, except for the slide parts, which Ry did.

Vai actually wrote and performed Eugene's Trick Bag in that movie, then he was pretending to be unable to play his own piece, so he's actually defeating himself.

Most people don't know about Vai's love of classical guitar, or his ability to do it so ridiculously well, as he had been practicing it since his time at the Berklee College Of Music in Boston.

/edit

http://epicrecords.com/g3/quicktime/

Vai on a tripleneck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 13, 2005, 07:47:24 AM
Vai played everything, except for the slide parts, which Ry did.

Vai actually wrote and performed Eugene's Trick Bag in that movie

Actually, it came on yesterday, and I started suspecting that very thing.

He really should play a Tele more (or something besides an Ibanez). I'd probably buy one of his albums if he did.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samprimary on April 13, 2005, 12:02:54 PM
Actually, it came on yesterday, and I started suspecting that very thing.

He really should play a Tele more (or something besides an Ibanez). I'd probably buy one of his albums if he did.

Oh yeah .. Vai took on Satriani's use of Ibanez. Hmm.

I love Vai, I really do. Great guy, family man, absolute master of what he does, etc. But I understand what is said when his music does not have 'feel'. I don't feel any aesthetic behind most of his pieces, but understand when listening to them that they are being constructed in a way that makes them amazing on a technical level. Problem is, I don't really like the way most of his music sounds, because he so rarely creates .. yeah, a .. I dunno, feel.

But he does have the technical amazingosity, which is why I love his live performances, and have the G3 DVD. His music, to me, is entertaining to watch. In fact, I was live at that concert in the clip I posted, just to watch that kind of stuff.

Occasionally, he manages to emulate the feel that his sensei Satriani has (Always With Me, A Train Of Angels, etc), and makes songs like Juice, which have wider appeal.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 14, 2005, 12:17:32 PM
Quote
Most people don't know about Vai's love of classical guitar, or his ability to do it so ridiculously well, as he had been practicing it since his time at the Berklee College Of Music in Boston.
Don't forget his early gig as a transcriber for Frank Zappa. That's great ear and theory practice alone.

I'm not a fan of Vai, though I do hold him in great respect. To me, Vai is the guitar Yanni/Tesh.

In guitar news, I'm going to be getting an acoustic, I've decided. Relatively cheap, don't want to spend more than $500, if anyone has recommendations (or cautions/warnings). I like/enjoy using two words/concepts like this! :) Sorry.

I also grabbed a few books for some inspiration since I've done so much electric lead playing lately. I listen to a lot of old blues masters, but I've put in more time than usual with Robert Johnson the past couple weeks and I'm itching to work on my acoustic fingerstyle, which I used to be pretty good at (albeit classical style, not blues). Hoping to also locate my grandfather's banjo and apply some things to that, too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2005, 12:28:54 PM
In guitar news, I'm going to be getting an acoustic, I've decided. Relatively cheap, don't want to spend more than $500, if anyone has recommendations (or cautions/warnings). I like/enjoy using two words/concepts like this! :) Sorry.

I'll keep my recommendations to Fenders:

Standard Tele or Strat. Mex made has become a good value in the past few years methinks. Even better, find a used 50's/60's reissue model (the MIM ones) -- fucking great guitars, and just as good as Am. Standards, but with vintage hardware (new, around $500-600...used, $300-$400 range). The 60's neck is sweetness.

EDIT: At least get that guy to order one so you can play it for yourself. Then decide.

If you don't happen to like those, the Jimmy Vaughn is a great value (similar to the 60's model, but with a modern radius and Tex-Mex pickups. He was even nice enough to put the "Jimmy Vaughn" signature at the back of the headstock, instead of the front).

The Deluxe Players Strat is in the same price range, and has some cool features as well. 12" radius, ala Gibson/SRV, Noiseless pickups, 7 way switching

If those don't entice you (I highly recommend that 60's reissue...I can't express that enough), I'm looking to sell a 2002 Gibson SG Special for $450 (paid around $700). No case, barely a scratch, and the only mods are (better) Schaller tuners.

I'll post pics soon...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 14, 2005, 12:39:14 PM
Just watched the G3 stuff linked.

Vai. Meh. Could barely sit through the entire thing. I would sum it up as simply showing off without much thought toward making good music. This guy needs to learn songwriting and structure from more than a technical perspective. Good chops delivered in a boring and bland fashion.

Satriani. I put it there with Vai's piece, but with a band. He fit the music better and made a song out of it, but it wasn't a very good song, not memorable in the least. Good chops delivered in an unflattering medium.

Malmsteen. I'd never thought I'd say Malmsteen is the strongest songwriter of the bunch. It helps he's playing one of my favorite tunes (of his). But note how he integrates his shredding with the band, strong melodic lines and structure. Good chops delivered in a kick ass format with a shredding band. Everyone has huge chops and is using them to play to the song and unify the melodic movements. Song has hooks without rock cliche.

To sum up, I need to go get me some old Rising Force stuff. Hell, I was trying to remember how to play Black Star a while back...Yngwie is the man, he just don't like donuts (no-prize to whoever gets the reference!!).
Quote
I'll keep my recommendations to Fenders:
Acoustics, man, acoustics! :) Martin, Rodriguez, etc. Not sure whether to go steel strings for blues/rock or gut strings for flamenco/classical...seperate pickups, I'm thinking, though, rather than acoustic/electric combo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2005, 12:49:40 PM
Those "3" could have benefited from a "fourth" imo. Like I mentioned before, I'm not a big fan of the shredder type of guitarists, but Eric Johnson kind of stands out to me. He's also one of the only ones that uses better (vintage) gear....Another plus for him in my book. If he happens to not play "soulful" all the time, his guitar will make up for some of it at least.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2005, 05:03:44 PM
Oops, didn't realize that you only wanted recommendations on "Acoustics"....At least that's what it sounds like on a second reading (?). Sorry for my rant on the Electrics.

Anyways, I've always been happy with Takamine. Then again, what do I know? I've never had anything but sub-$500 acoustics.

I know that Martin offers some guitars in the sub $500 range now (USA made too). I've only messed with some of those in store, but they sound and look great. If I wasn't already happy with my own acoustic, I'd probably get one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 15, 2005, 10:58:03 AM
I'll just post pics of the Gibson anyways, just in case you're interested. My camera is broken, so I had to take pics with DV. I'll find something else later if you want.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/sgsc_wc.gif)
Gibson's pic

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/sg_body.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/sg_inlays.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/sg_headstock.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/sg_serial.jpg)

The only difference between mine and the one at the top is that I have better tuners and moon inlays.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/sg_scratch.jpg)
Couple scratches too.

EDIT: Actually, $450 is probably a little too much. $400 (that's with shipping price) sounds better.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 15, 2005, 12:06:25 PM
Nice SG, those inlays are a nice touch. Wish I were in the market for an electric! Got the $500 in my pocket right now, goign to hit up the local El Cheapo shops and see if I can find something with decent sound and construction (the acoustic I referred to), I'm going to attempt to ignore branding and whatnot.

Nice way to slip in a pic of that Jag, heh. And the Apple/Jesus Hawk board, heh. My favorite board back in the day was a funky Christian Hosoi design (shark or mako or something). I did tigerstriped grip tape over the top of it, bought it in Long Beach, CA in summer '86, iirc. I'm so not a skater anymore, heh. Fall and bust my ass kind of skater, maybe.

Good luck on that SG, though, damned fine guitar! I'd be embarassed to post my guitar, but I just might for fun and grins (it's pretty bad, heh).



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 15, 2005, 12:36:43 PM
Nice SG, those inlays are a nice touch. Wish I were in the market for an electric! Got the $500 in my pocket right now, goign to hit up the local El Cheapo shops and see if I can find something with decent sound and construction (the acoustic I referred to), I'm going to attempt to ignore branding and whatnot.

Good luck then  :-)

Quote
My favorite board back in the day was a funky Christian Hosoi design (shark or mako or something). I did tigerstriped grip tape over the top of it, bought it in Long Beach, CA in summer '86, iirc.

Sweet. I know exactly what you're talking about. My brother always skated those.

edit:
Quote
I'm so not a skater anymore, heh. Fall and bust my ass kind of skater, maybe.

That Hawk board you see is the last I've stepped on...So far. Chipped my 4 front teeth skating that thing, and had to get a bridge. Don't feel bad -- I'd give anything if I had simply "busted my ass". That was more of a "Face" --- Meet your new friend "Concrete" ordeal.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 16, 2005, 11:43:47 AM
Well, that was pretty easy! Hit up the local shop (they have a great tech there) and played through their acoustic guitars. They had a decent selection of acoustics (yay school music programs), played some Deans, Yamahas, Alvarez, and Washburns (and a few El Cheapos I've never heard of). Since I tend to downplay my guitar experience, he started me on starter guitars, which was cool to get a feel from the bottom up.

As soon as I'd played through a few starters, I had a much better feel for what I was looking for, indeed, the neck I was liking the most was the cheap Alvarez. But I didn't like the electronics, nor the finish and inlays. He said, oh, here's the higher quality version, and I swear it had a little halo when he brought it down (could have been beer+sunlight). Had everything the cheaper model didn't, decent electronics, all natural finish with maple side/back, and just an inlay at the 12th fret. Alvarez AJ60-SC. The maple back is perfectly matched with a nice knurl on each side, a beautiful piece of wood.

Sound is nice and bright with good low-end punch. Loud. The electronics are good, some tone control beyond the 3 band eq and two gain stages. Running through the electric rig, it's serviceable with only a little mud at the very bottom and twang up higher. And the action is so nice, besides bending I forget I'm on the acoustic. Bending whole steps is a grade-A bitch, but that's the nature of the beast with acoustics, in my experience.

Paid $500 on the nose for the guitar + case + tax (which is nearing 10% in New York, yay).
(http://www.alvarezgtr.com/heartprodmedia/artistsprodmed/aj60sc.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 16, 2005, 11:52:23 AM
Oh, yeah. I was checking prices on a few things, and noticed this mandolin (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=guitar/search/detail/base_pid/519193/) was going for $40! Sure, it's cheap....but $40! Less than a damned console game. Think I'll grab one for the hell of it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 16, 2005, 11:55:29 AM
Nice choice! Is that as big as it looks? Kind of looks like a Gibson Jumbo shape, except with a cutaway.

Btw, have you ever tried Silk and Steel strings? They give a quicker feel, like electrics or classical nylon, in my experience. Good for bending too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: schild on April 17, 2005, 04:41:30 PM
I like men, i'm also a little girl.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 18, 2005, 10:56:06 AM
It's pretty huge. Kinda feels like playing a Gretsch with a thicker body.

Downside is I now have to buy another guitar, because I wanted to take this one hiking/camping with me, and it's too nice ;)

Schild: yeah, it's no secret.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 18, 2005, 11:04:55 AM
It's pretty huge. Kinda feels like playing a Gretsch with a thicker body.

Downside is I now have to buy another guitar, because I wanted to take this one hiking/camping with me, and it's too nice ;)

Live on the edge, man!

Seriously, it's meant for playing. Play it. Heh. Just don't let it fall of a cliff or something.

I like men, i'm also a little girl.

Well, don't feel left out. Little girls (http://www.daisyrock.com/) can play the guitar too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 18, 2005, 02:59:26 PM
Nah, they didn't have a hardshell case, I'm not going hiking with a huge fragile instrument in a gig bag. Maybe you have to know me in person...it's just not a good idea, I'm way too impulsive and hyperactive. I know in no uncertain terms I'd break it within an hour if I were out in the wilderness with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on April 18, 2005, 03:09:27 PM
I don't worry about the scales so much as playing the right intervals to make the "sound" or "flavor". Hard to explain, I guess.

Now that's the essence of modal playing, IMO.  The Phrygian mode isn't a scale to me, it's a sound.  I love it, so I throw the flat 2 into my playing a lot, just for that sound.

You obviously understand modes, but what I was trying to say is the way most method books teach students about modes is wrong.  If you play the C major scale, starting on F, over a C chord, you aren't playing in the Lydian mode; you are playing the C Major scale.  If, however, you played the C Major scale over an F chord, you would be playing in C Lydian.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on April 18, 2005, 03:16:32 PM
Those "3" could have benefited from a "fourth" imo. Like I mentioned before, I'm not a big fan of the shredder type of guitarists, but Eric Johnson kind of stands out to me. He's also one of the only ones that uses better (vintage) gear....Another plus for him in my book. If he happens to not play "soulful" all the time, his guitar will make up for some of it at least.

I saw the first G3.  Johnson followed Vai and got booed by the crowd, but he had a really hard act to follow.  Vai put on an amazing set with great showmanship.  Johnson had major problems from his vintage equipment and because so, wasn't that good.

Vai was my favorite of the night (missed the KWS set).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on April 18, 2005, 03:24:20 PM
It's pretty huge. Kinda feels like playing a Gretsch with a thicker body.

Downside is I now have to buy another guitar, because I wanted to take this one hiking/camping with me, and it's too nice ;)

Schild: yeah, it's no secret.

Get a Baby Taylor.  I got one for when I was travelling for work and it kicks ass.  When you get your hands on one, it looks very cheap and delicate, but it can take a beating.  And they sound HUGE for their size.  I've played with people who had cheap, full sized acoutstics and the Baby kept up, and in some cqases, sounded bigger.  Oh, and because of the short scale, they almost play like an electric.

The only downside is that because of the short scale, the intonation isn't the best.  You have to tune the B string a bit flat to get all your basic, open chords to sound in tune.  Playing chords up higher on the neck is annoying too, because they sound out of tune.  I need new strings for my regular Taylor, so I'm using my Baby and it annoys the hell out of me when I sing "No Excuses".  Luckily, I'm just singin' for myself :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samprimary on April 21, 2005, 07:51:09 PM
I saw Vai on Tuesday at the Fox in Boulder.

Y'know, I wasn't expecting much. His music is not stuff I consider to be interesting, and I hadn't enjoyed his performance at the Fillmore at G3 in Denver (The performance in that video I posted was taped there and then)

Buuuut this performance was dynomite. Absolutely wonderful, including a wonderful opening show by Eric Sardinas. It was incredibly cool, and far more than I would have expected given the fact that Steve and co. had picked up a bug and were performing sick.

Even though I have no particular interest in his CD's still .. I now thoroughly reccomend seeing his performances.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 21, 2005, 08:11:19 PM
Those "3" could have benefited from a "fourth" imo. Like I mentioned before, I'm not a big fan of the shredder type of guitarists, but Eric Johnson kind of stands out to me. He's also one of the only ones that uses better (vintage) gear....Another plus for him in my book. If he happens to not play "soulful" all the time, his guitar will make up for some of it at least.

I saw the first G3.  Johnson followed Vai and got booed by the crowd, but he had a really hard act to follow.  Vai put on an amazing set with great showmanship.  Johnson had major problems from his vintage equipment and because so, wasn't that good.

Vai was my favorite of the night (missed the KWS set).

Hmm, well that's a shame. It's not like I'm a big fan of his either, but I think I think he just stepped up a notch in my book. Anyone who gets booed by the Vai/Satriani crowd that easily is OK with me.  :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 22, 2005, 07:46:43 AM
I've only seen Vai once, with David Lee Roth on the Eat 'Em And Smile tour (Tesla opening behind their debut album, they kicked all kinds of ass, too), with Sheehan and Bissonette. Great show.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on April 25, 2005, 04:55:46 PM
I've only seen Vai once, with David Lee Roth on the Eat 'Em And Smile tour (Tesla opening behind their debut album, they kicked all kinds of ass, too), with Sheehan and Bissonette. Great show.

I saw Tesla a couple years ago, in Sacramento (their home town), right after they reformed.  They kicked major ass.  I forgot how many good songs they had; almost every one they played was a sing-along.  Plus, they had a beer cooler on stage.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 18, 2005, 01:15:07 PM
Since Stray whined about me ignoring this thread :)

I found this clip (http://home.twcny.rr.com/iamthey/bwlg.mp3) among a bunch of guitar riff clips when I was cleaning out my data drive. I like to "jot" down ideas and back them up to cd every now and again, so I don't lose them. It was the only bass riff among hundreds of guitar riffs, according to the file metadata I recorded it last october.

I remember doing it, it is the germ of a song idea I have on guitar that I was trying to flesh out with a bass line and come up with some bass hooks. This is just me trying to jam out a few ideas, so it's pretty rough both in content and timing, lots of pauses and crap. But as I don't play bass any more, and only recently started playing guitar again, I thought it was pretty decent, the latter half is closer to the style I played professionally, I was pretty classical-heavy (hey, that was the era for it!).

Not much, but it's something to keep the thread alive :) Some day I'll actually record something worth listening to, I'm not much for polished recordings, heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 18, 2005, 01:32:53 PM
You sound like a Geezer.  :wink:

Pretty cool. I've got stuff laying around here that I should go through....I "notebook" just about everything, but haven't put together something substantial in a while. It's hard to get a good rockin' song going without some friends around (for me at least).

Also been buying a lot of "guitar" albums lately. Getting CD versions of some old albums (Band of Gypsies and Jeff Beck for the win). Also been getting a lot of this guy (http://www.nelscline.com/). Nels Cline. He's the bees knees, I tell you. If Di Meola was in Sonic Youth, it'd sound like him. Some MP3 samples here (http://www.nelscline.com/mp3.html). I recommend getting the "Instrumentals" album.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 18, 2005, 02:00:38 PM
Geezer 'taught' me how to play bass. I worship at the altar of Geezer. I love Cliff, but to me Geezer is what a bass player should be. Heck, lots of my blues guitar riffs are Geezer riffs, too :) So...thanks!

I hear you on trying to write without a band, it's tough. I always had a songwriting partner in my singer, but it's been over a decade since I've seen him.

Speaking of guitar albums, which I'm always buying, finally got the cd version of Ozzy's Tribute to Randy. Goddamned I love Randy. He's so aggro when he plays, listening to his Iron Man or Paranoid is refreshing. Also got Clapton's From Cradle to Grave disc, some great blues soloing on there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 18, 2005, 02:31:22 PM
I've wondered what would have happened to EVH's rep if Randy hadn't died. Rhoads was just as good (well, maybe that's arguable), but much different as well. Would Eddie still have been the most influential 80's rock guitarist? Would there have been as many imitators?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 19, 2005, 11:24:09 AM
I'll just post some Cline clips directly. Most of this is his Jazzy stuff, not the noise rock-ish stuff.

Beer Bottle Collection (http://www.nelscline.com/sounds/Ground/beer_bottle_collection.mp3)

Square King (http://www.nelscline.com/sounds/Pin/squareking_edit.mp3)

Bath (http://www.nelscline.com/sounds/Chest/bath.mp3)

Cause for Concern (http://www.nelscline.com/sounds/Instrumentals/cause_for_concern.mp3)

Ghost of the Pinata (http://www.nelscline.com/sounds/Instrumentals/ghost_of_the_pinata.mp3)

Anyways, I'm always happy when I stumble upon an indie/punk musician who's really skilled on his/her instrument. It's like the best of both worlds to me. Too bad that there's very few of them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 19, 2005, 12:31:57 PM
That's good stuff. I think if I were playing with a band currently, I'd be a lot looser like that, as I enjoy just jamming along. But playing alone, I focus a lot more on not only technique, but note selection and a hundred other critical things (critical in that I self-criticize a lot while playing alone, whereas I'm more likely to forget minor flubs in favor of the overall groove when playing with others).

Bath was very nice, but they all rocked. Cause for Concern reminds me of my scale jams. When I get tired of running scales, I start to make little melodies that still traverse back and forth, up and down. I like the syncopation in the last clip. I saw the Holmes Brothers sunday (completely incredible, from soul to blues to gospel, and awesome guitar work) and I noticed I tend to watch the drummer more than anyone else, part of why I can always lock into that groove, and why 'stock' drummers bore me. I like them to constantly change up the rhythym...to give me ideas!

Really bums me out that cat from Syracuse lives so far away and has a band (with his brother, so a solid band connection). The freeform classical/metal stuff we were doing on open mic nights was completely fucking amazing, wish I had recorded it. It was a constant jam, him throwing out new rhythyms and me weaving them together, him feeding off what I played and viceversa, just a great experience, and pretty much what I'm looking for in a band. Start with a drummer like that and then try to find other musicians who can keep up.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on May 24, 2005, 02:53:08 PM
Geezer 'taught' me how to play bass. I worship at the altar of Geezer. I love Cliff, but to me Geezer is what a bass player should be. Heck, lots of my blues guitar riffs are Geezer riffs, too :) So...thanks!

Geezer kicks ass!  I love how he's so tight when it's time for the monolithic riffs, be he gets loose and groovy when one of those isn't happening.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 29, 2005, 01:30:24 AM
I made out like a bandit recently....Picked up a Vibro-King (i.e. the Holy Fucking Grail of Tone) off eBay for cheap.

A $2100 hand wired, Fender Custom Shop amp for $900. Kind of different from other Fenders, in that it doesn't just produce a Blackface or Tweed type sound. It'll do the Stevie Ray or Dick Dale thing, but it'll go into MC5-ish territory too (Townsend and Chris Isaak both use them these days, if that gives you any indication of it's versatility and how good it sounds). It's a 3x10, which makes it a little different from other Fenders as well.

It has a built in Fender Reverb Unit (not the standard kind, but the old school stand alone 3 knobbed one, like this (http://www.pedaldoctor.com/images/IMG_0586.JPG)), and I can get a perfect Surf sound out of it. Especially with the Jazzmaster. Only downside is that it's a single channel 60 watter...Which means, if I want overdrive, it has to be CRANKED......But when it is, it's one of the best.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/vibro-king-ebay.jpg)

I'll take a snapshot of my guitar with it soon.

I'm downsizing on just about everything I own now. Besides the occasional stompbox, I don't need anything else.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 11, 2005, 03:00:13 AM
So anyways, here's my new rig...I got rid of all of my electrics except for a Tele and Jazzmaster (including the baritone that sparked this thread). No more amps except this bad boy:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/VK_and_Jazzmaster.jpg).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2005, 01:08:31 PM
That's a sweet combo! The 3x10 is interesting, I was playing through my 7x10 (an 8x10 with a bad speaker ;)) and it is real nice and punchy, but now I'm playing through my 1x15 (dean markley cab with an ev 400W full range 15" in it).

I really need to forget the mortgage for a couple months and buy a decent guitar. I've been playing a lot more lately, trying to master the happier styles, less doom and sludge playing. Recently I've been studying the Allmans and Betts, much to the delight of my girl. Just got the 2-disc Setzer Orchestra live set, it smokes. Also got in a Rev. Horton Heat compilation, really been stretching out and it feels great.

And my electric strat knockoff is dying in a big way, the electronics are shot, and it's not worth fixing. I've had a big eye for a couple Epiphones, the Epi les paul custom and the Epi les paul baritone, or perhaps a real strat. I'm pretty excited about it, hopefully I'll have some pics to share soon!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 11, 2005, 01:34:49 PM
Those Epi's are great guitars for the money....There's just too damn heavy for me personally. Les Pauls in general, I mean. I've gotten wimpy over the years or something.

I've been eyeing a Gretsch Duo Jet lately, but it's the same deal. Heavy as shit, but man, they sound great. They look sweet too:

(http://www.gretschguitars.com/repository/gretsch/images/G6128T-1962_xl.jpg)

Anyways, go for it....Just get it out of the way :) Good luck on whatever you get.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2005, 02:57:36 PM
That Gretsch is teh sexay!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 12, 2005, 08:48:46 AM
Listening to all this Setzer and Horton really, really makes that Gretsch look teh sexay! If only for that nice tremolo system, I don't use a tremolo bar (I'm a bender with crazy vibrato), but for the psychobilly, it's essential.

Also, I was at the shop my buddy works at and one of the teachers there thought I sounded very rockabilly, he thought that was my 'specialty' from the jam I was playing. At the time I found it odd, but I can hear it in my chording and phrasing now that I'm listening to more of it.

I'm not sure what the heck I'm good at any more, classical, metal, blues, rockabilly, rock, southern rock...I don't care so long as it sounds good! It's interesting having my girl listen to me play (she loves the guitar, luckily), she picks out so many more mishmashed influences and trends in my playing, it's been a great analytical tool.

Edit: Holy crap, it's not cheap, though! $2700 for the bigsby model @ musician's friend!! Yowzers, but it IS nice...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 12, 2005, 09:41:53 AM
Listening to all this Setzer and Horton really, really makes that Gretsch look teh sexay! If only for that tremolo system, I don't use a tremolo bar (I'm a bender with crazy vibrato), but for the psychobilly, it's essential.

Also, I was at the shop my buddy works at and one of the teachers there thought I sounded very rockabilly, he thought that was my 'specialty' from the jam I was playing. At the time I found it odd, but I can hear it in my chording and phrasing now that I'm listening to more of it.

I'm not sure what the heck I'm good at any more, classical, metal, blues, rockabilly, rock, southern rock...I don't care so long as it sounds good! It's interesting having my girl listen to me play (she loves the guitar, luckily), she picks out so many more mishmashed influences and trends in my playing, it's been a great analytical tool.

The guy who taught me how to play was into all of this 60's instrumental type stuff (like surf), so I think it's always resonated with me the most. Not just surf necessarily, but the general approach. Spacious reverb, echos, not really blues based. That could be anything from Television, Sonic Youth, My Bloody Valentine, Surf, or Spaghetti Western music. Then again, I'm just as enamored with Link Wray...Who was more in-your-face and rockin'. I've also been...for all intents and purposes....into "punk" (then again, that word means little these days).

I guess you could say that I play slow surf (i.e. Spaghetti).....Just with more "noise". I like single note type riffs drowned in reverb, but when I play chords, I like them to be hard and ring out. And sometimes, I just play "noise". *shrug*  :wink: I need to upload some clips.

Not that I don't like anything else, but playing-wise, I'm just comfortable along those lines. I can do a little "Angus", or "Jimi", or "Kerry King"....But to be honest, it isn't really happening. That much I know.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 12, 2005, 01:55:00 PM
To me, punk is old  CoC (though the newer stuff is cool, too, Pepper Keenan rocks), Accused, Black Flag, the traditionals like the Pistols/Ramones/Clash/Kennedies, Butthole Surfers, Fear, stuff that was raw and uncommercial. Not so much the Good Charlotte or Green Day, though those are decent punky pop bands imo. I listened to a lot of that stuff, still have some LPs around I think, because I was in the skate scene when I was a kid, back when Tony Hawk was making videos in his backyard. I recently dug up my Fear tape because they butchered "Let's Have a War" from The Record on that eMotive APC disc, which I thought sucked (a first for MJ Keenan imo). "I Love Living in the City" is a classic. The Surfer's "Lady Sniff" was one of my favorites for rawness, with their entire "Rembrandt Pussyhorse" album being one of my favorites of all time, stuff like "Waiting for Jimmy to Kick", "Whirling Hall of Blades", and the hauntingly cool "Creep in the Cellar".

I should upload some clips, too. I moved the room around and everything is unplugged. When I first started playing again a couple years ago, I recorded everything, because I have CRS (can't remember shit). Now that I'm getting a little better and actually trying to write stuff I could use the focus of the recording. I'm just way too jammy, my girl cracks up because I have exercises designed to play boring rythyms without going off: throwing in fills, trying for alternate fingerings, etc. I don't think it's possible :P I think my best is two repetitions of a 12 bar blues/rockabilly riff before I start noodling about.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on July 12, 2005, 11:06:01 PM
I know nothing about any of this.

But my cousin and brother are both very big into music.

Here are a couple songs my cousin digitally recorded.  All him, all original stuff.  Just in case you guys want to hear it.

If you're impatient- it's definitely Vai or Satriani inspired, reminds me of The Black Mages (Japanese rock band who cover Final Fantasy music)

http://travisaustin.bluedomino.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/breakpoint.mp3
http://travisaustin.bluedomino.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/blue.mp3

Now I will step back out of this thread, into a subject where I belong.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 13, 2005, 06:53:28 AM
That's some cool guitar work. It does sound a lot like the Vai/Satriani thing. I enjoyed it, though it's not really my thing: a bit too slick. And I hate synths. I blame Eddie VH and Geddy Lee for that.

The composition is nice, too. A bit more dynamic than most one-man projects, and the drums didn't annoy me, which often happens with drum machines. Personally, I intend to play my own acoustic drums when I put my stuff together, even if it means it's messier.

I also have the benefit of a great bass player...I find it funny (and sometimes frustrating) that I'm /still/ a better bass player than guitar player, even though I put the bass down almost ten years ago and have only been focusing on guitar for the last couple years. I actually started as a thrash metal guitarist, then learned classical in school, then picked up the bass when every bass player we auditioned sucked (our original bass player was from a Rush cover band). When I was playing open mics to see if I could still rock the stage (I can, phew), it was funny how nobody believed (from my playing) that I wasn't really a bass player anymore, hadn't played in years.

Then they saw my right hand fingers dripping blood after two songs, from the burst blood blisters on the tips...I play hard, and had no callouses...but it did prove my point...Anyway, one project I've got going on right now is restoring the neck on my bass, it was gunkified to hell and back from being in storage.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 13, 2005, 07:14:51 AM
I had a friend who told me I was a better bass player than a guitar player (I had a guitar in my hand at the time)....

I was *this close* to knocking him across the head with it.

Heh, it's true though...I just won't let anyone else tell me that  :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: AOFanboi on August 29, 2005, 12:33:18 PM
Me? I play guitars, not mmogs.
Ah, aiming for that level 60 Metallica world tour end game? You need to kill the Kirk Hammet boss mob first.

See? You cannot escape!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 29, 2005, 03:03:00 PM
Kill Kirk Hammett? He's the only one left that shouldn't be smacked across the head.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on August 29, 2005, 03:34:09 PM
Every shmoe wants to play lead/rhythm.  The real men play Bass.    :evil:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 29, 2005, 03:55:15 PM
I play both....As do most guitarists. I rarely meet a straight up "bass player". They're just guitarists who see bass as having less of a barrier to entry.

Besides, this is Metallica we're talking about. Why someone would want to play bass in a metal band is beyond me. You're going to get mixed out in the end anyways.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on August 29, 2005, 04:16:53 PM
Playing and being are two different things.  I could give a crap either way as I do neither and was just parroting something I'd read years ago.   However, as you said, you get mixed out in the end*, so you have to REALLY want to play it to be the bassist, IMO. 

*Unless  of course you're Burton oldschool or Terjilligjilo on that newest piece of shit.. Damnit let Kirk play!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 29, 2005, 04:45:07 PM
I don't mean to derail further, but I don't know what the difference is in "playing a bass" and "being a bass player".  Care to explain that to me? Is it some kind of Lemmy thing, or what? :) I mean, I guess I prefer the timbre and feel of guitars more often than other instruments, but all I really am is a musician.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on August 29, 2005, 06:11:14 PM
Yeah, it's a philosophy and a mindset thing.  Kind of the difference between playing an instrument and being a musician.  I can play the sax, but I'm no musician. It's all technical to me, I have no heart in it.  You can play a bass, but that doesn't make you a bassist if you're just playing it because they won't let you play lead or rhythm. You'll suck at it because your heart won't be in it, even if you're technically perfect.  Just MNSHO.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 29, 2005, 06:57:29 PM
All I'm trying to say is that the same "dedication" that requires a musician to be proficient on bass is the same dedication that's used when they pick up a guitar. With basses and guitars, there isn't much to learn to switch from one and have the same effect on the other.

All fall under the disicpline of "string instruments", then further differentiate themselves in such ways like violins and cellos and their use of bows; harps and lutes being non fretted and intonated on a string by string basis; dulcimers using a hammer to sound off notes; sitars using some strings for droning, etc., etc.. Basses aren't too much different than guitars other than that their necks are about 6 inches longer, and they (traditionally, though not exclusively) provide 4 strings instead of 6. Both have at least 21 frets, notes are primarily sounded with a plectrum or finger (and not a hammer or bow), both are traditionally tuned to standard EADG(BE) tuning and use the same scale fingerings......The only striking difference is that the bass is an octave lower. Which kind of, though not necessarily, lends itself to a rhythm mindset (but a "rhythm mindset" is very much a big part of guitar playing anyways....).

Other than that, it's a guitar in every sense. If a guy is a good "bassist" then he's probably pretty competent on a guitar as well. And vice versa. Look at Geddy Lee playing classical duets with Lifeson, or Paul McCartney, who could play better than either John or George -- They're both awesome bass players, and awesome guitar players as well.

I don't see how there's any inherent personality differences in the people who use them, because neither instrument requires much of a paradigm shift to switch to the other. It's not like moving from guitar to percussion or horns. That would make a little more sense.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 30, 2005, 06:42:50 AM
Quote
I play both....As do most guitarists. I rarely meet a straight up "bass player". They're just guitarists who see bass as having less of a barrier to entry.
Ahh...I see my perspective is called for! ;)

I started on guitar, but switched to bass when we couldn't find a good bass player. I was good with my fingers from classical fingerpicking. After playing strictly bass for a year, I pretty much started becoming a bass player. There's a different approach and mindset to playing bass, you can't just play guitar licks. It's pretty easy for me to pick out guitar players on bass in local bands, they play it like a low-tuned guitar.

Stray, you're talking technicality. Sure, they're both stringed instruments*. But the way in which they are utilized in a band setting are quite different, a different philosophy. Almost completely different. Hard to explain, I guess.

I'm feeling this now because a local blues artist is interested in me playing bass with him, I told him give me a couple weeks to build up my callouses...but now I'm finding my mindset has shifted and I'm playing bass like the guitar (which I've been practicing exclusively the last few years). That's why he hasn't asked me previously, and I tend to agree with him, as it's a disservice to the music to have a half-assed bass line driving things. A "full-time" or "real" bass player is always preferable.

* But really, one can't play the bass as a guitar due to the low register, the chording gets muddy, you have to adjust everything to fit the honkin' big sound waves you are pumping out and be careful about muddiness. And it's a different 'rhythym mindset', too, more locked in with the drums. My girlfriend finds it fascinating how much I tune into the drums when listening to music, it's from years of bass playing. Not that guitarists don't, as well, just that it's a more visceral thing on bass because your job is to hold the whole mothership together through the ride.

In my college days, we had 6 or 9 guitarists on each track...1 bass player. Even though we had a dozen guitarists and three bass players in the band. Totally different, despite all the similarities.

Hell, listen to a guitarist's solo album, if he's playing the bass. It's generally nowhere near as good as a real bass player, I'm listening to some Buckethead...great guitarist, but leave the bass to the bassists imo. Almost all guitarists make that mistake. I do, too, though at least I have the benefit of 6 years of professional bassing in my repertoire.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 30, 2005, 08:02:18 AM
Hard to explain, I guess.

Hah..Give me a little credit here, man. I've been playing both instruments for close to 20 years now. It's not that I play chords on the bass or anything. I hate tooting my own horn --- But I rip it up plenty. Many people have even pointed out (much to my chagrine) that I should be playing bass more than guitar  :x.

The thing is, I wouldn't know anything about bass or guitar playing if it wasn't, first and foremost, because of a general understanding of music. I'm a musician, in the generic sense.

Like I said, I don't play chords on the bass. Nor do I "shred" on the bass. What I do, however, is break chords down to their individual notes. And from there I build a melody and a rhythm. The rhythm is always in the root, and depending on whether the song is major, minor, 7th, 9th, whatever..That's where my note options will be.  The same options are there if I was playing lead guitar instead of bass. Take a C major chord being strummed on the guitar, for example, and you've already got a bassline with C, D, E, G, and A (the same way it'd be safe bet to melodize with those notes on lead guitar).

Now, as for a "guitar player's" mentality coming into the picture. I can understand one thing here -- Some (immature/wanker) guitar players don't understand the role of the backbeat. Which is why they sound like shit on bass. They don't have enough control to keep the rhythm, and start doing fill ins all over the place. They lose track of the root notes and throw themselves off (and the listener as well). But you know what? Those kind of guys suck at guitar too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on August 30, 2005, 08:31:40 AM
Now, as for a "guitar player's" mentality coming into the picture. I can understand one thing here -- Some (immature/wanker) guitar players don't understand the role of the backbeat. Which is why they sound like shit on bass. They don't have enough control to keep the rhythm, and start doing fill ins all over the place. They lose track of the root notes and throw themselves off (and the listener as well). But you know what? Those kind of guys suck at guitar too.

See, you get what I was saying, I just had no idea how to convey it to you. These are guys who aren't thinking like Bassists.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 30, 2005, 09:09:18 AM
Oh, I play chords on the bass. Just have to be careful so they sound good. The 7th chord turnaround on a 12 bar blues is tight.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 30, 2005, 09:13:00 AM
Chords or intervals? More than 2 notes at a time on bass just doesn't fit for me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 30, 2005, 09:50:30 AM
Oh, I play chords on the bass. Just have to be careful so they sound good. The 7th chord turnaround on a 12 bar blues is tight.

Duck Dunn would hurt me cry if I played chords on my bass.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 30, 2005, 09:53:25 AM
Nice name drop.  :-D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 30, 2005, 09:57:14 AM
Nice name drop.  :-D

It was an attempt at humor... apparently, a poor one on my part.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Shockeye on August 30, 2005, 10:42:38 AM
Speaking of Donald "Duck" Dunn, the 25th Anniversary edition of "The Blues Brothers" comes out on DVD today.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: AOFanboi on August 30, 2005, 10:45:29 AM
Why someone would want to play bass in a metal band is beyond me. You're going to get mixed out in the end anyways.
*points at Steve Harris of Iron Maiden as counter-example*

That said, it seems that the Metallica/Ozzy switcheroo has brought them a bass player that knows what you wrote to be true, and thus aims for stage showmanship instead.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Margalis on August 30, 2005, 11:04:53 AM
Iron Maiden doesn't have a lot of low register drums, which is probably why Harris can play bass the way he does.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 30, 2005, 11:34:59 AM
/rerail 

I am looking forward to this game (it is in no sense a virtual world).  How the hell did you guys get into that wierdo musician chat anyhow?
I am legally bound from answering this question.

Anyway, Harris is out front because he, you know, started the band and wrote most of the music. It's pretty much the Steve Harris Band, always has been. But as a former metal bassist, I agree with the sentiment, it's certainly possible to have a good metal mix with a strong bass. I would've mixed out Newstead, too. I never found him very interesting on the bass, I really like Trujillo, though. I hope he gets some love on the next album (I actually like St. Anger, too)

The 7th turnaround I refer to is a 3-note chord the way I play it. I actually used bass chords quite a bit, which is why I know how finicky they are, we had one guitarist so I'd do a lot of higher octave playing while he did solo work. And intervals...I do love me some intervals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 06, 2005, 09:58:58 AM
Funny Duck Dunn was brought up...about a week ago I was talking to my local blues buddy and I realized he hasn't had a bass player in his band in two years or so (he duets with a drummer ala white stripes, still a great sound).

So I ragged on him for a bit and looks like I'll probably get the gig. He just told me to work over some Albert King material (King played with the memphis folks - Booker T and Co, including Duck). Duck uses a lot of solid basics, but adds so much flavor to it, it'll take a while to get all the intricacies down, but I can pull off a lot of that stuff without a sweat (as in, all but one track off Born Under a Bad Sign learned in the time it took to play the track, same as this blues buddy's original material).

But it's all about the nuances. Takes a couple minutes to learn the song, a couple years to master the nuances, especially since this is new ground for me, tonally I skipped a lot of theory that didn't apply to minor keys (:(). Fun stuff.

I figured the downside would be my right hand, when I was doing open mics they literally broke out in blood blisters and I bled all over the place. But oddly, it's my left thumb that's killing me, I guess it got out of shape for those long stretches on bass (I have stubby fingers) and increased pressure.

But it's feeling pretty good and once I strengthen that thumb some more, I'll be playing in a blues outfit! Woot and whatnot. Even though my girlfriend feels I should be fronting my own, playing guitar. She just doesn't understand paying dues and learning on the road. What better way to enhance my blues guitar than playing with an excellent blues guitarist, even if it's on bass. I'm still learning all his tricks. Oh, and free beer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 06, 2005, 10:19:05 AM
Dunn is great, but I think I learned more about bass playing from listening to James Jamerson (and Paul McCartney, who's very much like Jamerson in many ways). Maybe it's my preference for Motown over Stax, I don't know.

Albert King is the shit as well. I hate to say it, but umm....Stevie Ray Vaughn....I'm sorry, but he's just trying to be Albert King (and I do like SRV, don't take me wrong). Also, as much as I like BB King, it's kind of sad that everyone knows who BB is, but Albert's barely remembered outside of guitarist circles these days.....But that could just be because BB has had the fortune of living a long time. Albert's influence on modern electric blues is just as far reaching as BB's. They're like the two branches that set the tone for what is blues today..But only BB gets the mention, and the sound that is Albert's is attributed to Stevie Ray.

Anyways, that's my rant..

Blues Power (http://home.earthlink.net/~kthompsen/Blues_Power.mp3) (always a good track...)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 06, 2005, 10:22:27 AM
I'm the guilty party that brought "Duck" into this.  

I've been playing bass for over 20 years now.  As I've grown and matured (yes, they are different things), I've come to realize that more isn't necessarily better.  When I was in my early twenties I got all caught up in technical bass (Lee, Squire, etc.).  Now that I'm older and more secure in my playing, I find that it's more about "the groove" than it is about the notes.  That's something I've always loved about Dunn.  The guy has all the technical skills needed to be a flashy bassist, but would rather find his place in the music.  

Then again, it could be that my fingers just don't move like they used to... damn those synapses.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 06, 2005, 11:29:14 AM
That's one thing my girlfriend was concerned with: this guy I'll be jamming with is pretty basic, and I tend to be pretty fancypantsy on guitar. I had to explain it's all about that groove and subtlety.

SRV...I don't really listen to his stuff since I started a serious blues journey through time. He's ok, but he's also real..I dunno, clean and commercial, like a more talented Robert Cray. Too slick imo. Sure, he can crush that texas guitar, and his Little Wing is my very favorite song ever, but overall I don't give him much ear time.

Otoh, Albert's BUBS, which I mentioned above as the album I went to, is one of my very favorites. His voice is just so mellifluous, almost like Orbison on the ballads. His left-handed crazy bending is mind-blowing, and then adding in the band...just some great stuff.

Some other great stuff I've been wearing out: John Mayall's Bluesbreakers with Clapton: such an incredible album. I'm working through some of that on guitar, in fact (I got the majority of All Your Love in one playthrough, woot!). Clapton plays a lot of minor pentatonic, which is my safety zone, so I love jamming his stuff, it flows off my fingers, whereas SRV is a struggle because of the texas shuffle style. Also why I can identify with Pagey really well, too: he does a lot of pentatonic minor with modal coloring. Clapton's From the Cradle is pretty intense, and I've got the DVD he made during the sessions for the Me & Mr. Johnson sessions...I actually like the sessions more than the finished product. And of course, my beloved Robert Johnson cd...I'm years away from his incredible fingerpicking style, but I'm whittling away at it slowly. And Muddy...always listening to Muddy, my first bluesman. Gotta track down that album I had as a kid, a live Muddy disk with Johhny Winter on guitar (which turned me onto that crazy mofo).

So much good stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 06, 2005, 12:15:46 PM
Quote
Albert King is the shit as well. I hate to say it, but umm....Stevie Ray Vaughn....I'm sorry, but he's just trying to be Albert King (and I do like SRV, don't take me wrong).
Hope you got that tune, gotta be fast when I'm leeching webspace :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 06, 2005, 12:55:10 PM
He's ok, but he's also real..I dunno, clean and commercial, like a more talented Robert Cray. Too slick imo. Sure, he can crush that texas guitar, and his Little Wing is my very favorite song ever, but overall I don't give him much ear time.

You know what it is? It's that damn in-phase sound (2 and 4 positions on the Strat pickups) that Cray exclusively uses, and Stevie/modern Clapton to an extent. It's good for a lot of things, but for the blues, there's just no balls in it. I don't understand why these guys, who are some of the best blues guitarists ever, gravitate towards that sound. You can hear Stevie's weaker moments in that Stormy clip, for example, and it's only when he's flipped in the in-phase position. Out of phase, he grows his balls back.

Almost everything Clapton does these days (on electrics, that is) sounds sterile and weak for the same reason too.

Little Wing has balls because SRV was doing Jimi, who played in the neck.

Don't take me wrong though...These guys could outplay me for all eternity, even with a shitty tone. It isn't the playing I'm knocking, for sure.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 06, 2005, 01:58:18 PM
No, I understand about the criticism disclaimer ;)

Like when I was explaining why I didn't like Tull's guitarist to my girl. I told her that's why I have to be good, I have to be able to back up my opinion with my own playing...eventually. She laughs because I don't compare myself to my peers in the area, I compare myself to Page, Clapton, King, etc. The way it should be imo. Why pat myself on the back because I'm better than some podunk nobody, anyway?

Found an old copy of Cakewalk (9 iirc, with the manual for 8, heh) an old bass buddy gave me years ago. Without the gimping of shareware (no multitracking) I'd been using, I've got to start laying some shit down! I'm not used to cleaning things up for recording, my loose playing style + listening perfectionism run at counter purposes... The bass gig thing is another thing I didn't need on top of trying to work in more guitar.

Gaming? I remember when I had time for that...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 06, 2005, 02:02:58 PM
Well, good luck with all that, man. I hope you have fun.

I haven't done much of anything myself in the way of gigging, or even jamming, for a while now. Not because I don't want to, or because I'm busy....I'm just lacking the motivation or something.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 11, 2005, 11:17:28 AM
I've got a new favorite blues album: Hound Dog Taylor's first (http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:5287gjer86ix).

Holy crap man. If you like the blues, check this puppy out. I'm using it for bass practice right now, but the guitarwork is phenomenal as well. Leans a bit to the boogie side of the blues. This is the cd that will clinch my spot in my buddy's band ;)

I also found out I'm improving on slide, I had my acoustic and slide out when doing my first listen and my girl was pretty impressed (though that's not real tough, heh). Improving from totally sucking isn't saying much, heh. Slide ain't easy (good slide anyway...haven't explored open tunings yet ala Derek Trucks, Allman, ad nauseum).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 11, 2005, 11:32:32 AM
I love slide too, but admittedly, I'm not too good at it. I don't play blues slide much though....I use open minor tunings mainly. Kind of gives it a more arabesque/gypsy feel.

[edit] I'll check that CD out.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 21, 2005, 06:23:08 AM
Try soloing in that open minor tuning over major chords, that's how a lot of blues go. I'm struggling learning bass lines for blues because there is so much major keying, I keep hitting sour notes :P But it's coming along pretty damn good, I've got a few good patterns with fills and if it calls for a pentatonic bass line, I'm golden.

I was hitting up some guitar sites, and I found a 'lesson' that got me thinking. It was for 'dexterity', just chromatic patterns all up and down the neck. That got me to wondering...do you guys do that kind of stuff? I used to when I first started many revolutions ago, but I found it to be a waste of time. I get my dexterity practice by playing tough pieces or by focusing on tough passages (like repeating a section of string skipping or whatever). I basically don't like playing stuff that's not musical, especially if I can get the same benefit from playing music instead (I tend to the shred side, which bugs me :P).

Still loving that Hound Dog album, got Derek Truck's live album, too. Trucks' live album is a nice melange of styles, blues, jazz, latin, african. Not something I'd listen to every day, but some great jams in there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 21, 2005, 01:09:28 PM
Try soloing in that open minor tuning over major chords, that's how a lot of blues go.

Well, the one I mainly use is open G minor tuning. All I have to do is put the second string back to B, and I've got major G (ala Keef)....So, that works pretty good for blues. I use open D a lot too, which is a blues tuning (i.e. Robert Johnson), but you can do other things with it too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 03, 2005, 07:36:59 AM
Stray, don't kick me :)

Just bought a Gibson SG.

No idea I wanted one, I spent saturday with a guitar tech at a local music shop going through about 50 guitars (a fraction of their selection, just the good stuff). Played a wide variety of strats, because I thought I wanted one...but it's just not versatile enough (and I dislike the out-of-phase positions). Played some expeeeensive Les Pauls, including the Black Beauty (omg...I didn't plug it in, the pickups are too sweet), which I actually didn't care for. The neck was a baseball bat. Went through a couple Schecters, almost bought one with a sweet neck with an abalone vine inlay all up the neck and another with abalone around the perimeter of the fretboard..but they just looked a little too slick for me.

Played some great Gretsches, but again, they are a little too limiting for my main guitar (it'll be a while before I can swing another one as I'm saving for a mortgage). Also worked over some Teles, I really like those guitars, but again, limited sound. I can definitely see a Gretsch, Strat, and Tele in my future, though.

Finally narrowed it down to a sweet Strat and the SG. I had no intention of buying an SG, but when I finally plugged them in, there was no contest. All the guys at the store agreed I was really tearing it up on the SG compared to the Strat, it was pretty funny how the tone made that much of a difference in my playing.

'61 Reissue, standard red stain finish. Got in the car and remembered this thread. D'oh! ;) Anyway, I'm pretty happy with it.
Quote
So, that works pretty good for blues. I use open D a lot too, which is a blues tuning (i.e. Robert Johnson), but you can do other things with it too.
Actually he seems to use an oddball open Aadd7 or something. The exact tuning escapes me just now, I'm still lazily working slide in standard tuning.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 03, 2005, 10:11:19 AM
Hey, a 62 RI is FAR better than what I was gonna sell you (though for much cheaper). Mine was a SG Special (did end up selling it though).

Anyways...Congratulations, man. Kick ass guitar. I'd probably have my SG around still, but it helped pay for that Vibro-King I ended up buying. I'm sure I'll get around to owning another some day. Probably a 60's model as well (that 60's slim neck is much better than what they do on current models imo).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 03, 2005, 11:48:29 AM
Going to pick it up tonight, I'm totally stoked. So is my girlfriend...since she doesn't have to hear me say "Damn I need a new guitar" anymore. Now it's "Damn I need a new amp", I was also checking out tube combos surreptitiously :P There was one sweet vintage tweed 2x12 that really sounded shweet...

She also loves Derek Trucks, I didn't tell her until I chose the SG that it's what he plays. Bonus points with the little woman there. We have a deal - she can marry Trucks if I can marry Susan Tedeschi ;)

On the playing front, been making great progress on acoustic blues, getting my foundations. Working turnarounds and vamps and bridges, etc, then applying them to a lot of tunes from Johnson to Clapton, Muddy to Buddy. Listening to a lot of Buddy Guy and Muddy lately.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2005, 08:31:50 AM
OMG why didn't I buy a new guitar years ago!?!

This guitar is so sweet I can't stop playing it. Brought it into work, ostensibly to play show & tell, but really just an excuse to play it some more :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 04, 2005, 08:54:25 AM
Now it's time to buy more  :-D.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2005, 11:20:56 AM
I wish. I'm cool for now, I've got two great guitars now, the SG and the Alvarez jumbo acoustic I bought a few months back. Really going to buy a lot more once I get settled into a nice house in the country, though. Might have a line on a used banjo (gratis) so I don't have to refurb my grandfather's. Then maybe a mandolin. After that, I'll start considering the laundry list: Telecaster, Strat, Gretsch (or Gibson semi), baritone (Jag, maybe), P bass, Ricky bass, dobro, etc, etc, etc.

But for now I'm more than happy.

Actually, as I mention above, now I'm thinking about a nice little tube combo amp...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 18, 2005, 12:15:30 PM
I'm starting to realize lately JUST how much bending is a whole discipline in it's own right.

Of course, I've always known how to bend....But to really make 3 or 4 notes sing, and flow into each other: That isn't easy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 19, 2005, 06:58:24 AM
Yep. And unlike my el cheapo, the SG is set up for very wide bends. I should make a run at some Albert King 2 and 2-1/2 step bending again, literally couldn't bend my old guitar enough to hit them. The SG is like bending butter. If that makes any sense :P

The more I try to work on scales and now chords, the more I have to remember to focus on just a handful of notes and work the shit out of them. My inner critic keeps popping up and saying I need to play an arpeggio or something. I need a popup blocker in my brain. I'm still feeling pretty bad about my playing, but for the first time since I've been dating my girl, I said it sounded good. I mean, it does sound good at times, I guess it's the first time I told her so...odd.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 19, 2005, 07:06:48 AM
The SG is like bending butter. If that makes any sense :P

Yeah, though I do like Fenders more, and the old 7.25 radius (newer Fenders are almost 10), I fret out a lot. I don't have my SG anymore, but it's was always better for this kind of stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 25, 2005, 08:33:22 PM
You electric players crack me up. :)

Then again, I am not much of a gear-head.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 25, 2005, 08:48:32 PM
You electric players crack me up. :)

Then again, I am not much of a gear-head.

Ah, I love my acoustic too! Been playing more of that lately actually.

But yeah, I sound pretty silly when it comes to gear. Ever since I got my new amp and Jazzmaster though, the G.A.S. (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) has subsided. I haven't bought a thing.

[edit]

But...The same madness still applies to all instruments for me. It's a matter of timbre and playability. I could never truly be happy with just one sound and feel. I wish I could though...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on October 26, 2005, 01:02:28 AM
I had a bad case of GAS when I got my first good job, and I bought a lot of gear.  I was up to 5 electrics at one point (now I'm at 2).  I still have 5 tube amps though.  But mostly, I've been playing acoustic these days and working on the playing/singing thing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 26, 2005, 06:16:57 AM
Bah, I'm no gearhead. When I was playing bass professionally, I was using a hock shop bass with a hock shop amp. And it was originally the amp powering our singer, pre-PA days when he sang through a 4x12. I like things as simple as possible, with a basic decent tone which I then work with to find a good tone. I'd really like to get a new amp, looks like I'll be playing Oblivion on low settings! With the new guitar, though, my Boss GT6 got some legs and sounds decent enough, I guess. Sky want toobs.

I have crappy tone, but playing through a few Sabbath cds last night (been a looong time since I've jammed metal, though Sab is almost blues a lot of the time), it was sounding really nice with minimal effects. I was in a serious hammering groove, Iommi style. It was a nice break from what I've been working on. My main goal right now is visualization, being able to mentally see more options so I can more closely play what I hear in my head. I can often do this with Em/B mixolydian, but I need to work over more scales and get them all memorized. Blah, I hate that stuff, but it makes me better at what I love, improvisation.

Acoustic? I love mine, read back a few pages, Raph ;) Got one earlier this year.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 26, 2005, 02:13:14 PM
Walking lines on the bass (in blues) is exceedingly easy if you remember 4 notes: 1, 3, 5, and 7 (and yes, that's *major* third).  Every other lead in tone around those notes is legal as well, and sounds damn good.  Bass lines in classical I-IV-V blues changes (12 bar blues) are centered around the root not so you are always safe with those 1-3-5-7 notes, regardless of the key.

As to why this sounds good over a pentatonic blues scale, well, I can't explain the thoery, I just know it works.  Guitarists rarely riff around the minor third so this may be why.  I also walk chromatically to the root of each chord change from whereever I am, since all those lead-in tones are 'legal' as well.

Of course this isn't jazz, so you will spend a lot of time on the roots and 5ths of the chords, especially if the guitar player is way far out there in their soloing.  People don't like it if someone isn't constantly reminding them of the chords!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 27, 2005, 06:24:05 AM
That's what trips me up, the difference between bass lines that sound good with the rock-n-rolly 1,3,5,7 and stuff that sounds good with the walking pentatonic. Just a lack of experience in blues bass, in a way, since most of my blues bass actually came from Sabbath :P I can walk a /mean/ pentatonic line, which bleeds over into my soloing and vice versa (in soloing my blues pentatonic is often merged with various minor scales). But not having a firm grasp of major keys, the 1357 line always sounds like shit if I improv away from standard patterns, mostly because I don't know all the sweet spots.

I'm often on the minor third as a soloist, actually. With a 1/4 step bend, it's very bluesy. I dunno, it's just a great tone all around, not sure why people wouldn't use it.

My next project is a big ol' fretmap so I can start paying attention to note names in places I just have memorized, and to start using that to pay attention to notes I play alot and also as a reminder of coming back to tonal center and to make this a ridiculous runon sentence, also becoming more aware of my melodic motion through changes. Basically trying to pull my theory education back up through the decades of mental sludge I've built up...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 27, 2005, 10:43:35 AM
Quote
I'm often on the minor third as a soloist, actually. With a 1/4 step bend, it's very bluesy. I dunno, it's just a great tone all around, not sure why people wouldn't use it.

I think I stated it badly in my original post:  actually, the minor third is a *great* note in the pentatonic blues scale, however most of the time guitarists don't start their solo phrasings on it.  Roots and fifths are more traditional places to start, however of course there are exceptions.

The way I think if it is like this:  if I am in a Bflat blues progression, I know that I have four major (or strong) notes that I can emphasive in the chord:  Bflat (the root), D (the major third), F (the major fifth), and Aflat (the seventh).  I always start a walking pattern at the root, and go from there:  if you are jamming with only a guitarist, you are the only person there to establish the root of the chord so it's important that you do so.  If you have a keyboard or piano player with you, he/she will often leave out the roots in order not to tread on your playing.

So a common progression on the first chord (Bf7th) would be something like this (the first four beats leading into the IV chord):

Bf -> D -> F -> Af

Then we go to the IV chord, which is Ef7th:

Ef -> G -> Bf -> Df

Then for the V chord (F7th):

F -> A -> C -> Ef

You could play these four notes and it would sound perfect, since of course the progression is based off the notes of these chords.  However this would be incredibly boring.

So the 'trick' is that you can walk chromatically to the next chord from any of these notes, and it sounds perfect.  Let's take the first example:

Bf -> D -> F -> Af

We are in Bf, and we want to go to Ef, so lets go 'towards' this note:

Bf -> D -> F -> E -> Ef

So once we got on the F, we descend down chromatically towards Ef.  We can do this on the Ef chord going back into Bf:

Ef -> G -> Af -> A -> Bf

This would be a chromatic trend upwards toward Bf.

This sounds good because it leads the ear towards the chord you are moving towards, and the ear picks that up and 'completes' the progresssion.

I have an MP3 of my band playing a progression like this, with bass lines that follow this pattern.  Try this link (http://www.savefile.com/files3.php?fid=4092765)
to download it.  If someone can host permanently that would be great.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 25, 2005, 06:32:50 AM
(from stray's aborted true confessions derail)

I've been jamming along with major key stuff, trying to get some good riffs going. It's so funny to have a huge trick bag I can't touch while playing. My girlfriend thinks it sounds great (she's a former pianist), because I have to focus on strict melody without riffing at all. Damn her being right sometimes.

But I still crush when a minor key comes on, I can play just about any genre in minor keys.

I've really gotta get into the stuff Miguel is mentioning, playing more interesting stuff over progressions, and developing some good progressions and chords.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 28, 2005, 11:24:30 AM
I have a question for you guys:

I'm a bass player but get dragged into playing guitar quite often (usually because I like to play rhythm and sing harmony and have no desire to solo or vamp much).  I've been playing a strat or tele most of my years and have been toying with the idea of buying a Gibson.  I've had my eye on a late 80's - early 90's Les Paul Studio double cutaway but won't have a chance to play it before buying.  I've played a few Les Pauls and I love the sustain and tone.  Have any of you played the double cutaway and have an opinion to share?  How does the double cutaway vary from the standard Les Paul.  Also, are there other guitars you'd recommend?  I've thought about a Rick or Gretsch as well. I had an old Gibson ES325 a while back and liked it a bit.

Thanks!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 28, 2005, 11:36:15 AM
The DC is obviously lighter....In Gibson terms at least (all mahogany bodies are pretty heavy to begin with). Upper fret access compared to an LP is easier as well.

Soundwise, as far as I'm concerned, the DC's, SG's, and LP's all sound the same when equipped with the same electronics. Besides the 60's models and remakes (like Sky's new SG....Which has a slimmer neck), you'll get the Gibson solid body sound and feel from any of them.

The ES325 is a different beast though, and if you like that, don't expect the same. They're louder, nastier, more prone to feedback, and don't carry the same sustain as a solidbody. Not to say loud and nasty isn't good though! Just different.

Rics are similar, and if it's a Ric with single coils, it even more nasty. Just with more high end bite ala Fender.

So what do you like anyways? Fat, easily overdriven chords, with smooth leads and long sustain? Get the DC if the price is good. Or do you want something more like the Tele and Strat sounds you've been messing with?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 28, 2005, 11:38:50 AM
I would recommend the Gibson SG 61 reissue :P It's a great guitar, I played about a hundred guitars before settling on it. But that's me. I didn't get my hands on a Les Paul double-cutaway, though. Any reason you can't get your hands on it first? It's really worth the journey to a big guitar store to put the entire stable through the motions, imo, especially if you're going to drop big bucks on one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 28, 2005, 12:15:51 PM
Playing a newer version is possible, but finding a place to play vintage instruments is tougher.  I guess I'll make a trip to Denver and see what I can get my hands on.  Living in Wyoming really has had a profound effect on my ability to explore instruments.  Sometimes I miss my days working as a tech in a guitar shop in Minneapolis.

Thanks for the input Sky.  I'll give the reissue a try... though I think I may be too much of a hack to really appreciate it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 28, 2005, 12:27:16 PM
Playing a newer version is possible, but finding a place to play vintage instruments is tougher.  I guess I'll make a trip to Denver and see what I can get my hands on.  Living in Wyoming really has had a profound effect on my ability to explore instruments.  Sometimes I miss my days working as a tech in a guitar shop in Minneapolis.

Thanks for the input Sky.  I'll give the reissue a try... though I think I may be too much of a hack to really appreciate it.

Yeah, that kind of sucks if you can't explore a bit. Even same model guitars sometimes differ from each other. Especially Gibsons (a lot of the newer, more affordable, multi piece bodies are sketchy especially).

[edit] can't spell today...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 28, 2005, 01:43:10 PM
though I think I may be too much of a hack to really appreciate it.

No one is too much of a hack to appreciate a good guitar. I think even kids deserve a decent instrument, but that's me.

It's a Gibson, just like the DC. The differences apart from the horned and thin body shape (which makes it lighter than both the DC and standard LP), is that it has a 60's style slim taper neck, and '57 Classic pickups (the 57's are modeled after the standard Gibson PAF pickup sound. It's the sound heard in just about all Gibson guitars before 1980. They're not super hot like modern metal humbuckers. Think Angus/Townsend).

The slim neck is what makes it really stand out. 60's Gibsons tried to go for more slim feel like Fenders, but resorted back to the older style baseball bat sized necks by the 70's. Some people prefer the 60's feel.

Note: Depending on what year that DC is, it could have 57's as well.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 29, 2005, 06:19:05 AM
Yep, the neck sealed the deal for me. There was a $3500 Les Paul that felt like a baseball bat, I thought it sucked...to the amusement of the shop staff. My SG is very thin, but also pretty wide. I'm honest when I say I've never played a better guitar (for me). I can't believe I waited 12 years to get a good guitar, it's really worth it if you enjoy playing, no matter your ability level. Hell, it brought my playing up a notch, easily.

Odd thing - now I see SGs everywhere I go, though a lot seem to have the whammy bar (boo!).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 29, 2005, 11:42:01 AM
though a lot seem to have the whammy bar (boo!).

Yeah, and those Gibson trems are barely stable. Worse than a Strat. Pretty much why I use a Jazzmaster for that kind of thing. It's just as stable as a Floyd Rose, but not as ugly or hard to work on.

I'd still buy a Firebird though:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/gibson_firebird.jpg)

As for the use of whammy's in general, I play a lot of surf-ish type stuff and like...Among other things. I like them. I like making all kinds of noises besides just touching frets. I'll yank my strings out with my bare hands if I think it'll make a good song!  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 01, 2005, 10:14:28 AM
I just came across this (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7369771912&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1) during my daily trip through eBay.  I figured that some of you guitar players might appreciate this bass.  It has a thin, fast neck for a bass and a wonderful fuzzy/hollow sound.  I've recorded with one of these basses and while they're pretty terrible for live shows they produce sounds so unique that they're tough to duplicate.

I may just have to buy this thing. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 01, 2005, 11:36:08 AM
I actually prefer bigger bass guitars, not small ones that guitarists are supposed to like. I did play bass professionally for six years or so, it was tough getting back into guitar after quitting music altogether for about 5 years. My first bass, which was a beater when I was playing guitar in the band, was some monstrously huge peavey bass. Very wide, thick, and long neck. My current bass (after that one was stolen) is a custom bass from the ESP shop in Hollywood. It's pretty thin, thin and long. The custom has some really shitty pickups I never got around to replacing, I was going to slap some bartollinis in it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Shockeye on December 01, 2005, 12:12:53 PM
Yes, please. (http://cgi.ebay.com/Rare-1969-Gibson-Les-Paul-Goldtop-69-dead-perfect_W0QQitemZ7371020630QQcategoryZ38086QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 01, 2005, 12:45:06 PM
Yes, please. (http://cgi.ebay.com/Rare-1969-Gibson-Les-Paul-Goldtop-69-dead-perfect_W0QQitemZ7371020630QQcategoryZ38086QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)

This (http://cgi.ebay.com/ORIGINAL-PRE-CBS-FENDER-CUSTOM-TELECASTER-GUITAR-CASE_W0QQitemZ7369791585QQcategoryZ38083QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem) would be more to my liking.  I just need to win the lottery or WSOP.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Shockeye on December 01, 2005, 12:50:27 PM
Yes, please. (http://cgi.ebay.com/Rare-1969-Gibson-Les-Paul-Goldtop-69-dead-perfect_W0QQitemZ7371020630QQcategoryZ38086QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)

This (http://cgi.ebay.com/ORIGINAL-PRE-CBS-FENDER-CUSTOM-TELECASTER-GUITAR-CASE_W0QQitemZ7369791585QQcategoryZ38083QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem) would be more to my liking.  I just need to win the lottery or WSOP.

Very beautiful.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 01, 2005, 01:49:05 PM
Vintage guitar prices make me cry. Please.

There was a time....Hell, only a little over a decade ago.....When yuppies didn't inflate the shit out of everything.

That P90 Goldtop is cheaper than usual though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 01, 2005, 07:01:18 PM
Vintage guitar prices make me cry. Please.

There was a time....Hell, only a little over a decade ago.....When yuppies didn't inflate the shit out of everything.

That P90 Goldtop is cheaper than usual though.

When I worked in a guitar store in the early 80's, I took a pre-CBS p-base in on trade for about $300.  I'm sorry I ever sold that bass. 

I want that goldtop ...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 02, 2005, 06:16:45 AM
I let a buddy stay with me during his divorce in the mid90s, right about as I was giving up on music. He picked up a mint condition, in case, with tags, Gibson Grabber bass, I forget the year, 63 maybe. For $150 at a yard sale in Mass. He didn't play, just thought he might some day. Even though I opened my doors to him and offered him $500 (all I had, I was warshin' dishes), he wouldn't part with it. Hell, I told him I'd give him my custom ESP plus cash, so he could still pick up the bass, he refused.

That guy was a dick, I'm friends with his ex-wife now.

As far as vintage goes, who cares. If it plays great, I don't care when it was made or what it looks like, really. People should stop watching antiques roadshow.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Pococurante on December 02, 2005, 07:45:41 PM
That guy was a dick, I'm friends with his ex-wife now.

You have a steady now right?  Just want to make sure dick still isn't involved... ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 04, 2005, 12:44:43 AM
My latest blog post actually has a recording in it. Feedback welcome, tho of course I will ignore it all. ;) It's a pretty simple little piece, and a hurried recording.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2005, 01:24:02 AM
I liked the music, but no offense: Midi guitar cracks me up  :-D.  No fluidity or finger/pick dynamics. I look forward to an audio clip though.

Again, I liked the music itself. No offense.


Also, that partial capo tuning is great. I've never used it before....There's a Townsend vibe coming from my guitar now.

[edit] Something about that song strikes me as sort of....Civil War-ish (?). Y'know, like those old folks songs used in PBS specials? And if it was recorded on a real guitar, it would seem that it'd be even moreso.

Maybe it's the name "Memorial" that's making me say that, I don't know. You can call me crazy if you want :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 04, 2005, 12:58:15 PM
Uh, the blog post has an actual recording. Did you miss that? There should be a little flash player embedded in the post, and you can click on Play and hear the real thing. The whole point was to replace the crappy MIDI. Go forth, and check again! ;)

I wrote the song on Memorial Day quite a long time ago, and yeah, it does have a bit of that old-school sound to it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2005, 02:45:13 PM
Ah, I see it now. Beautiful, man :)

Much different with the new tempo as well. Only at the slower pace did it take on that 19th century feel. Do you have a recorded version at the MIDI pace too?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 04, 2005, 03:17:16 PM
No, I'm lucky to have this recording of it. I think it was originally written somewhere halfway between the two tempos.

Hey, since you have the tab and a reference recording, you can record it yourself, any tempo you like! I'll post the cover on the blog if you do it. :) Think you can do a shredder version?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2005, 04:08:03 PM
No, I'm lucky to have this recording of it. I think it was originally written somewhere halfway between the two tempos.

Hey, since you have the tab and a reference recording, you can record it yourself, any tempo you like! I'll post the cover on the blog if you do it. :) Think you can do a shredder version?

Heh. Probably not. I'm a bit of slowhand...With a clanky Fender to boot. I'm sure someone here could though.

I did try messing with that tab last night on my acoustic actually, but ended up getting lost in the possibilities of that capo tuning. I never learned your song, but I did come up with two little things of my own.

A little explanation on "slowhand": I'm lefthanded, but I learned how to play righthanded. It's been 15 years since then, so I doubt I'll ever correct that mistake. In some ways, it may aid me, but my right hand technique, quick fingerpicking especially, isn't all that great. I doubt I could play your song with the same ease as you....And seriously doubt that I could shred it!

I love the loud, racuous, sound of electric guitars and all that, but I've never been much of a shredder. I can if I put my mind to it, I guess, but I'm more from the Neil Young or Richard Thompson school of shredders -- Those who play loud, but try to be as expressive with as little notes as possible ;).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 04, 2005, 05:53:47 PM
That partial capoing style was taught to me by Don Conoscenti  -- http://www.donconoscenti.com/ -- and I use it a lot. Basically, what it does is make an open strum give you the same intervals as a DADGAD tuning, only up one step. But you can use standard tuning chord shapes above it, to either meld with the modal sound, or if you barre or pluck carefully, come back in with a standard diatonic or chromatic sort of vibe.

I like it because it leads to a lot of really cool open fingerings. Just taking your current standard tuning pieces and playing them in it will open up your ears to some cool modal stuff, without putting you as far afield as actually going to a total alternate tuning.

If you feel adventurous, try moving the capo to 4th fret. If you have a second capo, you can also put it on first wherever you like, then capo with the partial two frets above it.

If you feel totally adventurous and are comfy in DADGAD, tune to DADGAD first, THEN use the partial capo. It's yet another world.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2005, 07:16:39 PM
Cool thanks for the tips. I'm going to play around with this for awhile now. I can't believe I've ignored the capo all this time!

DADGAD was the first alternate tuning I ever experimented with I think, but since I started playing with DGDGA#D a few years ago, I've become less comfortable and adventurous with the former. The partial capo sounds great though (while DGDGA#D with partial capoing sounds like shit....So far at least).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 04, 2005, 10:02:20 PM

The partial capo sounds great though (while DGDGA#D with partial capoing sounds like shit....So far at least).

Well, yeah... for one, you are losing one note out of the harmony since you have those two octave pairs on your low strings. For another, it's effectively DAEAA#D, which is strange. On the 3rd fret you would get more A#s at least (I'd write it as D-Bb-F-Bb-Bb-D, and now you're in Bb major...) Kinda plain.

What sort of stuff do you play in that tuning? It's like Gm power chord central.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2005, 11:37:41 PM
Crap. I just had a whole bunch written out, but my browser crashed.

I'd offer a few recordings, by my mics suck. The songs that I have been writing lately are being jotted down on a memo recorder. It doesn't make for quality listening.

Anyways....It varies on what I play. The tuning lends itself to a lot of droning and minor sounds, so I do that a lot. There's sort of a Morrocan/Gypsy feel to my leads (Sorry for the non technical terms. Most of my music training has been intuitive and guitar/fretboard pattern oriented). I already have a liking for that Spanish/Surf/Phrygian? sound in standard tuning, so all of that rubs off here as well.

I also alternate between a tuning with the low D dropped to an even lower C.

Sometimes I'll full capo at the second fret for A minor and play slide (it doesn't sound anything like blues slide though).

Over time, I've stumbled into various chord fingerings and areas that have expanded it's use beyond droning leads. Some of the rhythms I'll strum about on my acoustic just sound like normal folkish or pop songs.

I still play in standard tuning more often than not though...And in that respect, I'm pretty traditional. A little mixo/penta based Rock as well as surf and spaghetti western-ish stuff. Alternate tunings are always an adventure though....Not knowing what the hell I'm exactly doing with them is half the fun ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2005, 07:12:22 AM
Bah, I'm crappy at acoustic or I'd give it a shot. Sounds great though (!), wish I could play like that! I'm working some fingerpicking techniques but I get frustrated pretty easily by them.

And to make matters worse, I'm a capotard. I've never used one. And a bit of a tabtard, so even if I wanted to put up a version of it (that'd be a cool exercise as I need to record more!), it'd take me forever to transcribe the notation to something I could use.

The only open tuning I've used, and this only in the last month, has been DADF#AD for my slide playing. I've got one nice tune in the works with that tuning, but without my old writing partner I'm super lazy about progressing things beyond the raw ideas phase. I've got a few dozen song ideas mapped out without any structure ;) I used to write with my singer, I'd pull out the main ideas and as he developed lyrics, they gained structure.

I've put this one piece up before, it's my spanishy jam (http://home.twcny.rr.com/iamthey/spanish_jam.mp3). Recording quality sucks, because it's through some crappy shareware, and it was a one-off, just jotting an idea down. I want to get a little hard disk recorder for ideas, because using the pc (well, MY pc) is onerous for that kind of thing. I was practicing fingerpicking patterns a couple years ago and laid the first (barely audible for a lot of it) track down. While listening to playback, I was playing the second track, so before the first track was up, I rewound it and laid the second track over it, never went back to fix it up or do an alternate take...but it's all I've got on my work pc besides some crappy shred piece. I don't even know why I'm posting this after Raph posted that nice piece :P

edit: That was on my crappy old electric guitar, I had the EQ and effects set to make it kinda sound like a nylon string acoustic ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 06, 2005, 12:08:56 AM
Hmm, I should put up a produced track, if you like that one so much!

Your spanishy piece sounded good, but I couldn't really hear the backing track, only the lead line. :(

What notation do you use if not tab? Just chord shapes? I notate a lot of pieces first pass with chord shapes like this:

Memorial would go something like...

partial capo at 2nd fret as advised (note the tablature on the site is already capoed at 2nd fret, then partial capoed at 4th fret, so don't let that mess you up).

now, pretending that the partial capo is the nut, your chord forms are:

xxx2x2  (e.g., open strings on the x's, holding the highest string and the string two strings lower at 2 frets above the partial capo)
x2xx2x
x4x2xx
xx2xxx
3xxxx3
2xxxxx
0xxxx0
xxx23x

that should get you the main riff. Obviously, most of those x's are strings that are actually played.

I generally record using a A-T condenser mic in front, a cardioid pointed at the 12th fret or at the amp, plus the pickup running direct, all running into my 4-track (which has a 6 track mixer on it); from there into the Audigy card, into ACID usually. I also have a compressor/limiter I just about never use (it seems so NOISY!). ACID is just very handy for messing about.

My pickup in my main acoustic (which is what you heard in the recording) sucks though. I think that recording is just the mic open air.

Besides my main acoustic (a Blueridge with a neck like a baseball bat, the way I like it) I also have a Baby Taylor, a Mike Kelly mandolin, a mtn dulcimer, a Gibson '62 acoustic that I use for slide, a goofy Star Wars Fernandes electric, and my grandfather's old Harmony uke. Like I said, not an electric gearhead. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 06, 2005, 06:38:37 AM
No, I use tab...it's just that whole partial capo thing I'm not getting. I don't use capos, and I'm not sure I understand the partial capo concept. I was saying I'd have to transcribe the notation into raw tab, not considering the capo, which might make it impossible to play :P

That spanishy thing was recorded on el cheapo, direct into my asus a7n8x :P Using some shareware I don't like and don't have a manual for, heh. As I mentioned earlier, I really need a little 4 track of some kind for jotting stuff down, I haven't recorded anything in the last year or so!

I used to be a little bit of a gearhead, but it was all stuff that I got very cheaply. I had one of those first gen ART DSPs, but other than that I had about six stomp boxes (ProCo Rat distortion was my favorite, I was into metal in the 80s). My favorite rack gear was a Time Machine or summat, a great 70s echo/reverb unit that was capable of some truly odd stuff, got that one in a deal from a band that was hanging it up (their whole PA system for $1k!). I was playing a pearl BC Rich Bich, a knockoff V, knockoff Strat, a Martin Acoustic (man I wish I still had that), various cheapo guitars for throwing around, and my Peavey Bass. Laney full stack (head + 8x12 loaded with nice celestions) for guitar and an ancient amp (forget the name) and 2x15 for bass.

My current rig is also piecemeal: my SG, as mentioned, Alvarez Jumbo Acoustic, my el cheapo Cort for slide, and my ESP custom bass. Up until this year I only had my bass and el cheapo. A couple years ago I bought a Boss GT6, which is nice enough. I've not found a real comfortable sound on it yet, though, but it's fine for practice. I'm playing guitar through part of my bass rig. When my old band split and certain people absconded with much of the gear (meh, fuckers, it's happened many times to me), a bunch of locals who knew me back when helped me get my shit together, I got a crappy Peavey amp (Mark III Centurion) that I'm putting into a Dean Markley 1x15 cab loaded with a 400W EV full range 15". That's what I'm playing guitar through now, I also have an Ampeg 8x10" that I'm not using because it's a bit much for practice ;) Also, the Mark III doesn't drive it well, need the head for that unit some day, it's sweet. Got the head, the 1x15 and the 8x10 for $200. Got a ubiquitous shure sm57 laying around somewhere, I run that through the GT6 into headphones when I'm in the mood. The list is rounded out by an old beater drumset, it's beat to hell and back, really needs new heads but I hate dropping any money on it. I replaced the footpedal because I broke the cheap old one ;)

Thinking about getting a Fender Twin at some point, but the current setup cuts the mustard ok for just messing around.

/ramble


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 06, 2005, 08:55:23 AM
See, the whole last paragraph just about lost me entirely. :)

I have a Boss ME-50 effects pedal unit, and a Genz-Benz acoustic amp (Shenandoah Jr). That ends my lengthy list of amplified gear.

Oh, and I do have a bass, I forgot to list that, it's a Washburn.

The tab that is there is written as if the capo is not there at all. So if you follow the tab straight, you'll learn the piece in standard tuning. But I bet it'll be a bitch. :) At the very least, capo normally at 2nd fret, or you'll have to try to play the whole thing out of position.

The partial capo concept... well, a regular capo just moves the tuning of the guitar up by as many half-steps as you want depending on what fret you put it on. But a partial capo is like having a third hand that just holds down a chord shape for you, and you play above that chord shape. Imagine if you were in standard tuning in the key of A, and someone held down the regular open A for you down at the 2nd fret, which you noodled aorund up the neck. Every open string you hit will be in tune, because the A is held for you down there.

The particular capoing we're discussing actually gives you an Esus4 as your "base chord" down there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 06, 2005, 09:13:46 AM
Ahh, ok, I understand how you tabbed it now. Capos are still voodoo or mob bosses in my book :P I'd probably play it a whole step low with 2=O, etc. But I can see how the capo is superior in a lot of situations because you can play in standard tuning for the rest of the neck. Just tough wrapping my head around a partial capo, I only think of them as a full bar across the fretboard.

That gear paragraph really just boils down to a few guitars, the Boss GT6 effects unit, an amp head and cabinet. Nothing fancy, I just got rambly talking about it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on December 06, 2005, 10:37:00 AM
I thought that this was a partial capo:

http://media.putfile.com/thumpoff


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 06, 2005, 11:09:04 AM
Heh, I guess you could call it that, but that's "partial" in a different sense. He's just muffling basically.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on December 06, 2005, 11:32:19 AM
I know - I was being facetious, and using it as an excuse to post some fabulous Wooten bass. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 06, 2005, 08:16:18 PM
[edit] Oops. Wrong thread.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Jimbo on December 08, 2005, 04:14:53 AM
I still have my first real guitar that I saved my money from detasiling corn and doing odd jobs.  It is a Gibson Corvus II, still in great shape after all these years.  I'm not sure what happened to my Peavey Decade practice amp...should have gotten the Marshal 10 back in the 80's, but hey I was a rock-n-roll plowboy who dug the country/rock mix.   :-D

I'm glad I didn't add the Kahler aftermarket or Floyd Rose aftermarket tremolos system and I'm really glad I didn't get the Washburn tremolos system that the guitar shop wanted me to get, even if it didn't add any holes to my ax (heck I can't find any information on that unit...it was a big clunky system that mounted in your bridge and had all the cams in there so they didn't have to cut into your body, with a neck locker too...).

Found a pic of what the Corvus I looks like :
http://www.muc.de/~hm/music/Guitars/gibson-corvus-82973530/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 08, 2005, 04:43:46 AM
I still have my first real guitar that I saved my money from detasiling corn and doing odd jobs.  It is a Gibson Corvus II, still in great shape after all these years.  I'm not sure what happened to my Peavey Decade practice amp...should have gotten the Marshal 10 back in the 80's, but hey I was a rock-n-roll plowboy who dug the country/rock mix.   :-D

I'm glad I didn't add the Kahler aftermarket or Floyd Rose aftermarket tremolos system and I'm really glad I didn't get the Washburn tremolos system that the guitar shop wanted me to get, even if it didn't add any holes to my ax (heck I can't find any information on that unit...it was a big clunky system that mounted in your bridge and had all the cams in there so they didn't have to cut into your body, with a neck locker too...).

Found a pic of what the Corvus I looks like :
http://www.muc.de/~hm/music/Guitars/gibson-corvus-82973530/

Yeah, those were made when 80's guitarists considered Gibson's timeless designs, like the LP, to be out of touch (when it was actually those guitarists who were out of touch). The same thing happened to Fender to an extent as well. That was probably the last time when an average player could get a real nice vintage piece for an affordable price......Because all of the expensive guitars were Jacksons and Kramers!

Some of the ideas from back then were pretty neat though. The Corvus is both can opener AND guitar at the same time ;).[


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 08, 2005, 06:26:26 AM
My guitar player had a couple nice Ibanez blade guitars, a bit thinner than my SG, basic strat body shape, though. My bass is an 80s metal shape, very pointy, kinda like an explorer put through the Buzz Bunny experience. And I did play BC Richs for a while, I would still play a Warlock, they are pretty nice. But yeah, the 80s had some very weird stuff, especially the headless little box guitars.

Tremolos...blah. Everyone and their brother was using Floyd Rose floating bridges (and Jacksons and Kramers, heh), and I had such a heavy right hand (my band began as pure thrash metal, we were blistering) I'd fuck up everyone's guitar when I played it :P I hated those things, probably formed my anti-tremolo bias I still have. First thing I'd do with a new guitar is take off the bar if it had one. Love my SG with just a simple fixed bridge, it's perfect.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on December 09, 2005, 10:55:09 PM
good stuff here for you Sky

http://www.godofguitar.com/poses.htm


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on December 15, 2005, 03:15:59 AM
Nice thread.

I'll be buying my first guitar tommorow. Not sure what one yet, will be heading down to see whats good for me and in my price range. Will be doing the equivilent of taking a mechanic along when buying a car as my guitar playing sound engineer/muscian friend is coming and will test, advise and haggle for me :)

Will also be getting a Guitarport (http://www.line6.com/guitarport/) (watch out for the dodgy music on the flash intro if at work, it blares unexpectedly) for effects and stuff. I'm into metal but my (and aforesaid music bloke) roots are in tech/dance music so its a cool crossover with an interface i understand and i like the idea of the online lessons and stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: OcellotJenkins on December 15, 2005, 06:10:33 AM
Anybody here, besides me, into bluegrass or appalachian folk music?  I've been flat picking on a Martin DMX for 5 or 6 years now but aside from festivals, it's hard to find people to play with anymore. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 15, 2005, 06:39:13 AM
I saw an incredible mandolin player with a trio (guitar and fiddle) a couple weeks ago in Clinton. The guy's name escapes me, but he's a legend in the field, he was 71 or 72 and jamming like mad. Had a great and funny personality, too. Wish I could remember his name! An acquaintence of mine from the local Fender shop plays mandolin in a jam band and got on stage with that guy for a few numbers, he was phenomenal as well. Here's the site for his band, WoodenSpoon (http://www.woodenspoontheband.com/).

I got a line on another local metal jam, I had mentioned the old one I played at a few times (the first time I've played 'out' in a decade!). This one has all the usual local suspects, so I'm not real hot to get down there, especially in the winter when there is poor turnout (of musicians). There is a reason my band left this area, it's amazingly bad for creative eclectic musical folk....unless you dig a commute to jam, and I like to play a lot. I've gotten responses from a few guys I know that range from a 45 minute commute (each way), which blows for me since I want to jam at least three nights a week, to "I need $150 to plug in" (we call him HunnertFitty now) to "I only practice with the band once a week, I can learn the songs at home" Everyone is very paying-gig oriented, and I'm not in it for money at all, just to jam. Bah.

At least I'm still making (slow) progress in my own playing. It's cool when you're working on some theory and suddenly realize why you've been playing certain riffs for years. I love the feeling when something magically drops into place like that, it's pretty rare. Listening to a lot of Buddy Guy for inspiration, he's the man. Also Susan Tedeschi, she's a total badass. And Brian Setzer, but his playing fries my fragile circuits.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on December 15, 2005, 07:33:20 AM
Nice thread.

I'll be buying my first guitar tommorow. Not sure what one yet, will be heading down to see whats good for me and in my price range. Will be doing the equivilent of taking a mechanic along when buying a car as my guitar playing sound engineer/muscian friend is coming and will test, advise and haggle for me :)

Awesome.  Good idea taking a knowledgeable player with you if it's your first guitar purchase, too.  :)

I also picked up a new bass (http://www.zzounds.com/item--IBAEDA900SVF) fairly recently when Musician's Friend was blowing them out at $299 including HSC.  It's not the 5'er I really wanted, but it's still a damned sweet instrument.  Super-articulate (occasionally a bit too bright) thanks to the piezos, and has the ultra-skinny/slim Ibanez bass neck.  Lightweight and very resonant -- sounds great even when played unplugged.  The distinctive looks are just icing, though they're likely the reason the bass is discontinued now.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 15, 2005, 09:13:35 AM
Anybody here, besides me, into bluegrass or appalachian folk music?  I've been flat picking on a Martin DMX for 5 or 6 years now but aside from festivals, it's hard to find people to play with anymore. 

I'm into the more catch-all "Americana", if that counts? I like a lot of old American roots and folk as well, but nothing particularly/strictly bluegrass (not to say that I don't like it....I just don't own any specific albums or play that way).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 15, 2005, 09:27:36 AM
That's a shweet looking bass, Mr N! Cool beans. I did the same thing when I got my ESP custom, I had been at the Carvin store playing a very nice 5 string, but I was sold on the neck on the ESP. I do miss Hollywood, with manufacturer stores, vintage stores, and Guitar Center all in a couple blocks.

Now I need some new damn pickups for the old clunker, that's one reason I got it pretty cheap: stock passive crap pickups I always meant to replace with some Bartollini p-bass pickups.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 15, 2005, 10:12:11 AM
Nice bass Mr. N.  As for the 5 string bit, I always figured that if I wanted more than 4 strings I'd play guitar.  I'm still banging away on my 1970's Fender Jazz 4 string and can't imagine going to 5.  The neck width alone makes me cry. 

I hope that you discover the joy in music that all of us in this thread find. 

I picked this bass (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=AGB140) on eBay for dirt cheap last week and have been using it to see if I could harness some new sounds.  It's an inexpensive bass, but put together relatively well for the cost.  If I like the sound and feel of the open body, I'll likely pick up a vintage Vox teardrop or a Gibson from the late 60's.  Now I just need to find a good guitar and I can stop buying instruments for a while... I need an excuse to build myself a new cabinet!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on December 17, 2005, 02:21:07 AM
I still have my first real guitar that I saved my money from detasiling corn and doing odd jobs.  It is a Gibson Corvus II, still in great shape after all these years.  I'm not sure what happened to my Peavey Decade practice amp...should have gotten the Marshal 10 back in the 80's, but hey I was a rock-n-roll plowboy who dug the country/rock mix.   :-D

I'm glad I didn't add the Kahler aftermarket or Floyd Rose aftermarket tremolos system and I'm really glad I didn't get the Washburn tremolos system that the guitar shop wanted me to get, even if it didn't add any holes to my ax (heck I can't find any information on that unit...it was a big clunky system that mounted in your bridge and had all the cams in there so they didn't have to cut into your body, with a neck locker too...).

Found a pic of what the Corvus I looks like :
http://www.muc.de/~hm/music/Guitars/gibson-corvus-82973530/

Yeah, those were made when 80's guitarists considered Gibson's timeless designs, like the LP, to be out of touch (when it was actually those guitarists who were out of touch). The same thing happened to Fender to an extent as well. That was probably the last time when an average player could get a real nice vintage piece for an affordable price......Because all of the expensive guitars were Jacksons and Kramers!

Some of the ideas from back then were pretty neat though. The Corvus is both can opener AND guitar at the same time ;).[

The Fender of the day was stupid though.  They should have made out like bandits in the 80s, but they waited too long before trying to get in on the action.  They should have gone humbucker + Floyd Rose WAY earlier, and they should have backed a dump truck, filled with money, into EVH's driveway.

Now they've got Charvel/Jackson + EVH, and it will add a different market share and, in the case of EVH, boost their sales, but they should have done that shit when he was a REALLY hot property.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on December 17, 2005, 02:24:46 AM
Also Susan Tedeschi, she's a total badass.

No Derek Trucks love?  He is amazing.  I love Warren Haynes, but whenever I watch that newest ABB DVD, I scream at the screen, "JUST STFU AND LET TRUCKS SOLO!" everytime Warren takes a solo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on December 17, 2005, 11:52:03 AM
Bought myself a Yamaha RGX121Z (http://www.chamberlainmusic.com/ProductDetail.asp?ProductID=RGX121Z) in sliver, a Guitarport (which is great) and various assorted accessories and am happy so far :)

My friend got the Ibanez S520EX (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=S520EX) and will be putting in some EMG pickups, i get the ones in the S if they fit, and my brother took back an ESP he bought last week that turned out to be slightly damaged and upgraded to the Ibanez JEM7V. (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=JEM7V)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on December 17, 2005, 05:31:27 PM
Nice bass Mr. N.  As for the 5 string bit, I always figured that if I wanted more than 4 strings I'd play guitar.  I'm still banging away on my 1970's Fender Jazz 4 string and can't imagine going to 5.  The neck width alone makes me cry.

Thanks, Neb and Sky.  :) 

As for the 5-string thing, I just like the extra bit of range that they offer, though I prefer narrower neck widths in general (I started with an Iby Soundgear).  The EDA905 5-string, and to a lesser extent, my Peavey bass, have fairly narrow string spacing, so it's tolerable still - I've fiddled around with some others (Warwick 5-strings in particular) that always make me feel like I'm trying to play an aircraft carier, even with fairly long hands.

I picked this bass (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=AGB140) on eBay for dirt cheap last week and have been using it to see if I could harness some new sounds.  It's an inexpensive bass, but put together relatively well for the cost.  If I like the sound and feel of the open body, I'll likely pick up a vintage Vox teardrop or a Gibson from the late 60's.  Now I just need to find a good guitar and I can stop buying instruments for a while... I need an excuse to build myself a new cabinet!

Damn, I like those Iby semi-hollows.  They've got both that and the doublecut version of it at the local shop, and I can't resist picking 'em up and doodling away for a little every time I visit.  Right now, I'm kinda hankering for a short-scale (mmm... Mustang bass reissue)  for some reason though, and am running out of space for all my instruments as it is. 

Gah.  So much gear, so little time.

Bought myself a Yamaha RGX121Z (http://www.chamberlainmusic.com/ProductDetail.asp?ProductID=RGX121Z) in sliver, a Guitarport (which is great) and various assorted accessories and am happy so far :)

My friend got the Ibanez S520EX (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=S520EX) and will be putting in some EMG pickups, i get the ones in the S if they fit, and my brother took back an ESP he bought last week that turned out to be slightly damaged and upgraded to the Ibanez JEM7V. (http://www.ibanez.com/guitars/guitar.asp?model=JEM7V)

Awesome -- the two or three other Yamahas I've picked around on have been nice playing axes, and the pickup swap shouldn't be a problem.  I've been really curious about the GuitarPort, but have had decent (nothing pro-quality, but it's tolerable) results simply feeding a multi-FX directly to my soundcard for recording.  I hope you dig it and keep at it -- even though I'll probably never play for anyone but myself, I get a lot of pleasure from it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 19, 2005, 07:12:05 AM
No Derek Trucks love?  He is amazing.  I love Warren Haynes, but whenever I watch that newest ABB DVD, I scream at the screen, "JUST STFU AND LET TRUCKS SOLO!" everytime Warren takes a solo.
Trucks is great. We saw him with ABB in September and with his band in November. I prefer him with ABB way more, because of the interplay with Haynes and because his solo stuff is jazzier, and I barely like jazz. Both were great performances, though. I totally disagree with you about Haynes, he's an incredible guitarist and singer, too. It's one of the reasons ABB shows are so great, everyone on the stage (including the Juke Horns w/La Bamba) just kills. You can focus in on anything on stage and it's better than many bands entire output. We got the Instant Live cds (3) of the show, they hold up to the vintage ABB stuff I've got (Atlanta Pop and Fillmore). But...they've got a DVD with the new lineup? Woohoo!

After the holidays, I'm thinking of getting one of these (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/base_pid/240341/). I need something for ideas, and I don't like using the mouse to move sliders :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 16, 2006, 07:50:15 AM
Prompted by a joke in the Useless Video thread, I remembered my camera has video capability. So I made a crappy improv video just to see how it'd turn out. Here it is, fuckups and all (removed video link, took it down due to MB), I'm just jamming off the cuff to test the idea. Figured it might be passingly interesting to someone, at the least you can see my nice SG :P Well, kinda.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on February 16, 2006, 11:00:29 PM
You cut your head off.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on February 17, 2006, 06:41:58 AM
You cut your head off.

Hey... guitar players want to see guitar and the hands playing it :)

Nice one Sky. I enjoyed watching it. I like SGs


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 17, 2006, 07:34:08 AM
Guitar players have heads?


<Nice improv Sky.  You're going to make me want an SG damn you!>


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Soln on February 17, 2006, 07:54:36 AM
So my two cents.  And I have not read the full thread.  :)

Haven't posted since I haven't played seriously in a while.  Regardless...

My goal in 1994 was a Gibson _anything_.  Through great karma I got my hands in 1995 on a Gibsons ES-335 to supplement my hopelessly thick and high-action acoustic Fender FGx.  I played a lot of pop, some funk with it, wee jazz.  Had a "guitar computer" second hand for a while that allowed me to change to strat, etc.  Also had a lovely twin-chorus amp which was a jazz delight.   When I say "jazz" you must know I mean "standards" and BS, nothing original or interesting.

Ultimately, what I find myself pining for these days is a really really nice (American made) Strat AND one of these ... GODIN  (http://www.godinguitars.com/godinproductlistingp.htm).  I first encountered the Godin guitars (from Quebec no less) in a music shop in Belgium.  They are fascinating guitars.  One day, when I'm as rich as Raph I too shall have n+1 amazing guitars.  /dream

(http://www.godinguitars.com/gtrsacs.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 17, 2006, 08:30:32 AM
The thing about guitars...they make a great investment if you buy quality. I'll have my SG on my deathbed, after going through another 18 pcs or so (assuming I die in my mid70s), a few more hdtvs and projectors and cars and maybe even houses.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 17, 2006, 10:07:29 AM
If you like the Godin guitars but are looking for a non-classical for flat or fingerpicking, this (http://www.tacomaguitars.com/products/search.php?partno=0381100721) isn't a bad alternative.  As a resonant guitar for onstage or recording, Tacoma makes a very decent guitar for the money.  Think of it as a budget alternative for the non-nylon crowd.

I actually own a Tacoma acoustic and bought it to ease my urge to own a Martin. I'm very pleased with the quality and sound of the instrument for the price.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 20, 2006, 05:11:24 AM
Thought it'd be cool to post some guitar vids

Otis Rush (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1u18IFzvbA) (gotta love that crowd)

If you didn't know, he played upside down (Low E on the Bottom, High E on Top).

Jeff Beck - Brush with the Blues (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKVr6CZg4HQ&search=jeff%20beck) (aka How to really use a vibrato bar...And a guitar for that matter)

And just for a laugh: Sun Ra (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SsBtfuSDxw&search=sun%20ra)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on April 20, 2006, 05:25:08 AM
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=guitars+suck

3 vids showing clips of guitarists doing tricks and other virtuoso type stuff. Bumblefoot, Rusty Cooley,  Shawn Lane, Jimi, Buckethead,  Satch, Vai, the usual lot. The original is the best one i think, although theres some cool accoustic stuff on No. 3.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 20, 2006, 07:48:13 AM
Oh man, I loves me some Otis Rush. There's the real deal. Almost all I listen to these days are the old-timers. Nice little arpeggios in there, so much feeling. I wish I could slow down and phrase more like that, I always end up playing more like Johnny Winter... And man, can that cat SWEAT!

Jeff Beck is a great guitarist, but his performances somehow are always lacking, imo. I guess I'm just a bit too into traditional blues? I dunno, I definitely like his playing, but not his style, or something. I'm not a fan of the whammy bar or tapping. He's also kind of a dick.

Guitars Suck 3...the 12-string stuff was decent. The rest of it was pretty much shitty masturbation. Great technique, shitty music. Exhibit A in why I hate drum machines, at the very least. Reminds me of when I was 16 and too young to know any better.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on April 20, 2006, 11:03:18 AM
My background is drum and bass/hard techno music, as with the musician friends I know (heh, we end up playing highly repetative, very heavy rhythm without even realising it when jamming but im gradually slowing my head down to some different timings). All that tech and drum machine business sounds pretty good when done right and with the appropiate kit, virtual drummers have come a long way since an 808. The Guitars Suck vids are admittedly a complete wankfest though, and theres a couple of examples of why shredding a million notes a minute is pointless if none of the million notes actually go together, but I love that shit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 20, 2006, 11:31:16 AM
Bah computerized drums. I used them extensively in the studio and in college (I was a studio engineering dual majored with improvisational performance). But it's a matter of taste, when I was younger I dug it and electronica (which wasn't electronica then...). I used to use very early generation digital gear and echo boxes to create what can be done real easy with modern effects. It was fun stuff, but almost totally lacking in emotion.

Now I have my own (cheap, crappy) drum kit and I'm dying to buy a house so I can set them up and record rhythym tracks to play over.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on April 20, 2006, 01:29:25 PM
My friend uses the Steinberg Virtual Instrument plugins for the backing tracks, mainly the bassist and drummer. They are huge sample librarys basically (50gb install or something), although as he's a sound engie/musician type he can actually combine the digital recording/logic pro/instrument plugins and real instrument into something workable and actually has the ability to lay down something structured enough to play over. There's way too much of a learning curve for me to use unfortunatly.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 20, 2006, 05:17:10 PM
Hillybilly Yngwie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q8N-HDUvvg&search=60%27s%20country)

Sister Rossetta Sharpe (http://youtube.com/watch?v=4xzr_GBa8qk&search=rosetta%20tharpe) rocking gospel on a White SG

More upside down crazyness. This time from Albert King (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4xhS3dPTdk&search=albert%20king)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 20, 2006, 09:18:34 PM
Jeff Beck is a great guitarist, but his performances somehow are always lacking, imo. I guess I'm just a bit too into traditional blues? I dunno, I definitely like his playing, but not his style, or something. I'm not a fan of the whammy bar or tapping. He's also kind of a dick.

I understand, I think. I think it's a matter of his songwriting style, and not necessarily his playing?

Anyways, it's not like I'm a big fan or anything, but I still dig the guy if only because he's so innovative when it comes to technique. Nobody really sounded like that or got those kind of noises out of an electric guitar until he came along.

He might be better off if he didn't even try to resemble blues or rock at all though...Like in this clip: Link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3Vktv_yB7s&search=jeff%20beck)

The other cool thing about him is that he's probably the only person in the world who's maintained a Ziggy Stardust haircut for 30 years.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on April 26, 2006, 11:27:27 AM
Just saw this (http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/lightsnake-smart-audio-cable-169650.php) at Gizmodo.  Quite possibly the coolest thing for guitar I've seen in a long time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 26, 2006, 03:09:36 PM
Pretty cool. Not that expensive either ($40).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 26, 2006, 03:14:02 PM
Just saw this (http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/lightsnake-smart-audio-cable-169650.php) at Gizmodo.  Quite possibly the coolest thing for guitar I've seen in a long time.

That's very cool.  It reminds me that I need to record more... except that recording always reminds me of those little bad habits that I can so easily hide with effects pedals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 28, 2006, 06:50:29 AM
That looks cool. I've been shopping for a HD recorder for a while, though, because I tend to lose ideas in the time it takes my pc to boot up and run a cable to it  :| Also, mouse != faders, I hate the mouse interface for recording.

I've learned HD recorders are a gaggle of compromise. Either it's too feature-limited or it's a total goddamned studio.

At the least I want four simultaneous mic/line inputs (for drums, snare/bass/2 ambient), the ability to upload discreet tracks to the pc (cheap models export the whole bundle), decent onboard faders, aux for punch-ins, stuff I thought was pretty basic, heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 28, 2006, 06:56:18 AM
Believe it or not, a Roland drum sample disc and a sampler are a pretty good alternative. The disc I have has about 30 different kits on it (which you can mix and match, etc.). You'd be missing actual drumming dynamics, of course, but it's still a lot more realistic than the average drum machine.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 04, 2006, 04:59:30 AM
/rant

So is it me or is the typical guitar player flat out ignorant of "technical" things?

And when I say technical, I use that term lightly. I'm not talking about mods or amp maintainance. Just little things. Like adjusting intonation or getting their EQ settings right. Hell, I know plenty of people who'd consider even a string change some kind of big job....And then when they do happen to change strings, they can't even do that right either (You know, when they just wind the string all the way into the post, instead of giving it slack? Or when they let 8 inches of wire swing around on their headstock?).

Also, I have a neighbor who's probably been playing for 40 years, and he barely changes his strings.....And when he does, he tries to salvage the old ones by boiling them. I'll tell him: "Dude, I've got a gazillion packs at home. Take one," but then he acts like that's some big deal.

I don't know what's that's all about.

Secondly: Tuning. More often than not the sound coming out people's guitars is out of tune and out of pitch. Yet, they go about their happy way, completely oblivious that they sound like complete shit (regardless of what the song is, or if they have skills).

Thirdly: Tone/Timbre/etc. I may be a little picky here, but again, I'm not talking about anything silly, like Ash vs Mahogany or Rosewood vs Maple. Just simple things.

For example, I've got a friend, who for the life of me, can't distinguish between a humbucker and a single coil sound. Apparantly, all guitars are the same to him, besides looks. The same goes for amps -- There's just clean and distorted in his world. This is a guy, who, for some reason, makes (rather, has made) money playing music.

/rant off


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on May 04, 2006, 07:42:42 AM
/rant

So is it me or is the typical guitar player flat out ignorant of "technical" things?

And when I say technical, I use that term lightly. I'm not talking about mods or amp maintainance. Just little things. Like adjusting intonation or getting their EQ settings right. Hell, I know plenty of people who'd consider even a string change some kind of big job....And then when they do happen to change strings, they can't even do that right either (You know, when they just wind the string all the way into the post, instead of giving it slack? Or when they let 8 inches of wire swing around on their headstock?).

I've noticed it, but what other people do has never really bothered me - if the situation permits, I usually offer to do a setup for them.  The combination of fear and ignorance is what keeps 'guitar techs' in business doing maintenance and setups, despite the ready availability of the Internet and cheap tools.  One of the advantages to buying and modding up cheap gear or building from kits is that you have no fear when it comes time to take the things apart, and can then apply that experience elsewhere.

I keep waiting for one of the guys with strings hanging out all over the place to stab someone in the eye.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 10, 2006, 11:59:00 PM
Being an acoustic player, I just learned how to adjust intonation on an electric two weeks ago.  :|

I also have no idea what the tonal difference between a single coil and a humbucker is. :)

I can tell the difference between spruce and koa tops, though.

Anyway, that's all about to change. I just inherited a '61 Gibson Melody Maker. Despite being in a basement for thirty years, it's in great shape. The repair guy at the local shop looked at it, and sent it back, saying "you can do everything that needs done to it."

It sounds great too. I can tell the tonal difference between it and the cheapo Fernandes electric I have.

The repair prognosis on the 112-year-old banjo (not a typo -- SS Stewart, 1894), however, was a bit dicier. Looks like it'll be maybe $175 and a few weeks to get it back into shape.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Broughden on May 11, 2006, 01:31:48 AM

The repair prognosis on the 112-year-old banjo (not a typo -- SS Stewart, 1894), however, was a bit dicier. Looks like it'll be maybe $175 and a few weeks to get it back into shape.

I wouldnt have a "guy at the local repair shop" working on a 112 year old musical instrument. I would look for a professional antique restoration company, so as to ensure the greatest historical and therefore potential monetary value is retained. Maybe thats just me though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 11, 2006, 06:00:10 AM
I also have no idea what the tonal difference between a single coil and a humbucker is. :)

Singles vary from each other more than humbuckers do, but generally speaking, they're more bright and crisp (and noisy). Humbuckers offer higher gain and output, produce more sustain, but lack the high end dynamics of a single coil. For clean, non distorted playing, humbuckers are more mellow and lack the chime that a single coil produces. Both are great in their own way though.

More than likely, that Melody Maker you have has P-90 pickups. These are single coils, but they're more compressed, hot, and midrangey than the average Fender design.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 11, 2006, 06:43:57 AM
Quote
so as to ensure the greatest historical and therefore potential monetary value is retained.
Fucking capitalists. I agree with you about the professional restoration, but from a player's viewpoint.

I've traditionally played Strat knockoffs, but since I got my Gibson SG, I'm a total convert. Well, probably not total, because my Strat knockoffs were cheap, playing with some quality single coils would probably mitigate that a lot. I am hooked on the 61 reissue's thin wide neck, though. Bendy bendy bendy, big chunky Albert King bends.

Went to a great blues jam last night, hosted by my buddy Jim Wolf (http://www.myspace.com/jimmywolf). He's an amazing guitar player, he started playing a few years before I did, but kept with it professionally all through (and didn't make a major genre switch halfway along, heh). My girlfriend kept kicking me under the table to play, because I was better than a lot of the guys up there, but I'm simply not that comfortable playing blues yet. I don't want to halfass things, and my playing has been progressing well, so it's just a matter of time until things gel.

Now I just have to learn some actual blues songs (opposed to jams) :P I've got much of "All Your Love" (Mayall's version w/EC), "Since I've Been Loving You" (Zep, got that one pretty cold but requires a keyboardist), a decent chunk of "Hideaway" (Freddie King),  "Born Under a Bad Sign" (Albert King), a couple EC tunes off "From the Cradle". I can play pretty much anything with a standard progression without much in the way of tricky signature passages, but of course I enjoy playing songs with those passages to tie together extended jamming to avoid the dreaded jamband syndrome (beating the same three chords to death). I just have a hard time focusing on learning a song without going off constantly :) Luckily, that'll pay off as I learn some tunes, because I love to play around with arrangements and change the way I play songs to keep it interesting.

Best part of the jam last night was when there was an ensemble onstage and this old guy (had to be in his 70s) comes out of nowhere, walking through the crowd, playing trombone. He was really wailing on it, too. Great stuff. If I ever form another band, it'll be goddamned huge, horns, keys, I love varied instrumentation.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 11, 2006, 06:55:14 AM
Sounds fun, man.

I haven't made a conscious effort for blues in quite some time, but lately I've been getting better at slide (mainly open E tuning). Tried to learn some Robert Johnson tunes as well, but that ain't happenin'! So I'm learning Keith riffs instead  :lol:.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 11, 2006, 08:10:59 AM
Robert Johnson seems a lot more complex than he is, but it's sure not easy. The seperate bass line is killing me, it's the reason I'll never be a drummer. I've been working on acoustic blues a bit lately, but it's slow going and hard to stick with when I'm still at such a beginner level (imo) compared to my skill at other styles.

I'm working some slide, too. Open G stuff "In My Time of Dying" was the first slide tune I learned a couple years ago, now I'm working on some Muddy stuff like "Can't Be Satisfied" (actually the Library of Congress version "I Be's Troubled").

My latest cd binge:

T-Bone Walker - Blues Masters
Sonny Boy Williamson II - King Biscuit Time
Muddy Waters - Folk Singer (with Willie Dixon and Buddy Guy)
Elmore James - King of the Slide Guitar (3cd)
Paul Butterfield - Paul Butterfield Blues Band
Paul Butterfield - East West
Little Walter - His Best (my favorite harp player)
Otis Rush - The Essential Otis Rush
Alan Lomax - Deep River of Song (Alan and his dad among a few others did the Library of Congress field recordings, some great stuff from varied artists, some of the most essential listening you can do for blues imo, the /real/ stuff, non-commercial)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 11, 2006, 08:37:45 AM
Robert Johnson seems a lot more complex than he is, but it's sure not easy.

Well, I've got the general idea and can do some of those songs "my" way, I guess.  8-) I know the notes, but it's his attack and sense of rhythm. It's sketchy. It's amazing that he sang the way he did against this stuff.

Plus, combining slide with all of that finger picking isn't doing me any favors. I'm a lefty, but I play righty, so I'm a little slow for this kind of thing (same goes for classical).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 11, 2006, 09:18:59 AM
Yeah, I can't really bring slide into it because I play on my middle finger :( It's just how I learned, originally (up until a couple months ago) I played slide with a bic lighter that I pressed down with my middle finger.

And singing while playing anything is pretty much out for me, still. I'm working on it, and I've been having fun harmonizing...but when the rhythms start to get too independent of each other, sayanora to one of them :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 11, 2006, 12:18:34 PM
Im still having great fun with my guitars. Been at it since Xmas now, and pick up the guitar daily so looks like its here to stay.

I still havent got a clue about scales, have trouble knowing what key im playing in and can barely remember a chord, but can now getting hang of play some powerchords, play can jam rhythm along with mate, palm mute, pinch harmonics, tune the guitar down, as well as play some nice spanish melody stuff when the chicks are round, and yeh blimey, to think ive missed out on such a good fannymagnet for all these years.....


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 11, 2006, 12:31:25 PM
Scales....Well...

I've been playing for about 16 years, and I'm no authority on scales either (though I do know some things intuitively i.e. or as a result of learning riffs and whatnot over the years). My advice is just learn the songs and musicians you've been dying to learn, get at least a rudimentary understanding of rhythm (That's the real bane of new musicians. Not scales), how to recognize chords and keys a song's in, learn riffs and patterns (if not scales), and let it go from there.

There are more musicians (especially guitar players) who don't know a lot about theory than those who do. You're not alone.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 11, 2006, 02:03:03 PM
Having played professionally for years I can honestly admit that while I know how to set up my instrument, I often pay people to do it for me.  They are often more efficient and can sometimes bring new ideas to the table. 

As for the rest, there are many people out there that can play an instrument... very few of them would I consider musicians.  Too many young musicians focus far too much energy on becoming technical gurus and lose sight of the purpose of music. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 12, 2006, 06:43:46 AM
That's definitely true. There was one young guy at that open mic wednesday that was a decent player, but he kept plugging in these stock riffs rather than play melodies along with the band. It was kind of sad, really. But it was a good point to explain to my girlfriend that that was what I was trying to work out of my playing before I look to form a band. Riffs should be there to support the melodic playing, not just to wank off.

The worst part was he was playing a SRV strat and half of his band's covers used very recognizable SRV licks. It's like "Oh, they're doing the intro to Pride & Joy...no it's an original that is bland and stock beyond the SRV lick." Bah.

Actually, I'm starting to feel pretty comfortable in the blues, when a few more things become automatic, a couple scales (major pentatonic for instance, I always have to think to play in that mode because I've played minor and blues pentatonic for almost twenty years) and some chord variations (working on 7th variations has really enhanced my blues, but now I have to fit them with my scales!). I don't like to think about the technical stuff when I'm playing, I like to be very playful with the melodies and rhythms. Rhythms are really my strong point, I love playing around the beat and doing interesting attacks, a leftover from my metal days.

It's funny learning basically the opposite way I did originally. Back then, I practiced for hours every day with my band, at least two hours a day, often all day long writing sessions. But I rarely had time to practice alone, because it was either playing or partying. Now I never get time to jam with a band to work things out :) There were a couple tracks on the last...Guitar One, I think...guitar mag cd that are nice. They are basically cheesy backing tracks, a C shuffle and Am slow blues (which I totally crush, heh, I kerpwn minor keys).

/ramble


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 12, 2006, 12:47:44 PM
Er, the guitar shop is Buffalo Brothers (http://www.buffalobrosguitars.com/) and the repair guy is a banjo specialist who regularly works on vintage instruments. :) Give me some credit...!

Tho, fwiw, finding 100-year old banjos isn't that uncommon. There were several there for sale in the store. It's not like finding a 100 year old guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 12, 2006, 01:02:37 PM
Yeah, I've noticed that. Same goes for most folk instruments (dulcimers, etc). A lot of them seem to sell for pretty cheap.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 14, 2006, 02:13:30 PM
So yesterday I cleaned and restrung my grandfather's 1950's Harmony ukulele.  It's a baritone, so it's tuned like a guitar's 4 high strings. It came out rather gorgeous looking -- I never expected that underneath the dust. Sounds quite nice.

There doesn't seem to be a way to date these more accurately than by decade. I'm going off the logo styling...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 14, 2006, 04:52:19 PM
I posted a pic of the uke and also a recording. Wow, the tone on that thing, for a uke! Sounds like a classical guitar.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2006/05/14/may/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 14, 2006, 05:35:52 PM
Watch out, Tiny Tim!

Sounds like a cool thing to have around actually.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 23, 2006, 09:42:56 PM
When he's not snapping necks, he's just your average, humble "blues man" (http://www.stevenseagal.com/music/index.shtml).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 24, 2006, 06:51:47 AM
Hey, the guitar thread.

I think I'm breaking down and taking lessons for a while. I'm signed up for some basic blues harmonica lessons from a local cat (through our Art&Community Center), and went to see him play the other night. The guy he was with did some great acoustic blues guitar, and he gives lessons (through another Music & Art Center), so I figured wth. I'm also getting to the networking phase where I need to integrate into the local blues scene, this should help a lot because he has a studio as well.

He asked if SRV got me into blues, I chuckled and started listing my listening, I listen mostly to pre-1970 stuff, heavy on the 20s-50s. SRV is cool, but I'm not too interested in sounding like him, more like Big Bill Broonzy style. Should be good times as I finally figure out what chords I'm playing (some of them I can't quite pin down), and re-learn some theory I've forgotten.

Also, something to do on Tuesday night, heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 24, 2006, 06:54:07 AM
When he's not snapping necks, he's just your average, humble "blues man" (http://www.stevenseagal.com/music/index.shtml).
The sad part is....I've heard worse.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 24, 2006, 08:49:10 AM
I posted a pic of the uke and also a recording. Wow, the tone on that thing, for a uke! Sounds like a classical guitar.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2006/05/14/may/

Looking at getting a baritone ukulele myself, just for a bit of fun.

I was going to link Jake Shimabukuro but your article about him on your website comes up on page 1 of google searches for him, so i guess you know ....

Here's a vid of his thats not the Ukulele Gently Weeps one.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8395698617458049023&q=ukulele


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 24, 2006, 03:34:59 PM
When he's not snapping necks, he's just your average, humble "blues man" (http://www.stevenseagal.com/music/index.shtml).
The sad part is....I've heard worse.

Strange article (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2003012147_seagal25.html) here.


I gotta admit though. I don't really dislike him. Out for Justice is one of my favorite comedies.


[edit]

What's pretty kickass though is that he owns Jimi's Jazzmaster. That's even cooler than Jimi's white strat imo, since it's the first Fender guitar Hendrix was gigging with.

The only video of it in action, I think (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmRXikp8GAo&search=jimi%20hendrix). Very cool.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 24, 2006, 05:24:27 PM
Strange article (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2003012147_seagal25.html) here.

Quote from: Steven Seagal
I'm very quiet about it. I'm kind of reclusive as it is; I never like to blow my horn.

Right after he answers some of the preceeding questions as if he was the soul of jimi hendrix reborn.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 25, 2006, 02:09:12 PM
Might as well show off my new guitar. Im a big fan of Lamb of God and for ages I've wondered what guitars Willie uses, Ive always seen the ones with the sunburst many times. I found out exactly what it was on ebay last night;

(http://myspace-716.vo.llnwd.net/00767/61/71/767801716_m.jpg)

Its Willie Adler from Lamb of God's Framus Diablo Custom Shop (http://www.framus.de/modules/frameset/frameset.php) guitar and differs from the others they do as has a fast flame maple neck and wilkinson bridge. It was a bit battered and dirty from the tour it was used on (bloke said was relic finish, but just looks scratched and dinged to me) and willl need new strings and setting up again but I'm pleased.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2006, 06:33:09 AM
That guitar looks nice, but the site doesn't likey Safari :(

Lamb of God is cool, but I'm not big on yelling guys. Love the music, though.

I actually got my non-metal girlfriend into metal watching the VH-1 stuff this past week, because she's never really heard the heavy stuff with a melodic vocalist that doesn't sing in piercing registers. Unfortunately, there really isn't much actual heavy stuff like that, but she was digging Maiden, vintage Priest, etc. I'm a bad influence  :evil:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 26, 2006, 06:54:55 AM
Unfortunately, there really isn't much actual heavy stuff like that, but she was digging Maiden, vintage Priest, etc. I'm a bad influence  :evil:

I hate to admit it, but I just recently discovered the first two Iron Maiden albums. Bruce Dickinson's amazing and all, but I can only take him in small doses. Paul Di'Anno rocks! And the sound of Maiden in that stage was tight. Very "unepic", less spacious, etc.. It's just raw and rockin'. Not at all what I expected.

Best non high pitched vocalist in metal is Glenn Danzig. He's also the best Goth and Punk vocalist as well. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2006, 07:39:25 AM
I like all Maiden, up until Bruce quit, really. But the Dianno stuff is really great, so punky, raw and punchy. They are actually the only Maiden albums I own in cd format right now, since my blues buying interrupted backfilling my metal catalogue. Wait, I do have Live After Death.

Rime of the Ancient Mariner helped me pass 9th grade english :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 26, 2006, 08:24:35 AM
Do you know what show this clip (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eG37Mol9ms&search=iron%20maiden) is from? That's pretty a good quality and performance for an early vid.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2006, 09:40:54 AM
It might be from the Early Years (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0006B29Z2/qid=1148661464/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-5695724-7348745?s=dvd&v=glance&n=130) DVD. Not sure, I haven't watched it in a while. HIGHLY recommend grabbing it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 12, 2006, 12:39:39 PM
Posted another thing, this one with some electric in it (gasp!).

http://www.raphkoster.com/2006/06/11/the-sunday-poemsong-feel-the-slide/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 12, 2006, 01:04:19 PM
I like the lyrics; it's really not my musical style, but it does grow on me, it's catchy. A coworker (a vintage hippy) liked it. I didn't care for it at first, but by the end of the song I liked it.

Since it's guitar update time: I'm learning to read music. Again.

Took my first lesson last tuesday and it was a real barrier not being able to read music. Spent the last week grinding the very basics of music theory, which I remember enough to know I knew it, but not enough to use it. It's been torture.

But good stuff, in the end. My knowledge expands, my chops expand, and my repertoire expands (+All Your Love - Mayall's Bluesbreakers or Otis Rush). Not sure where these lessons are going, because I'm on track for a few months worth of re-learning basic theory, which I can do alone, I think it's time to needle the guy for some style lessons in early (pre-WWII) delta blues.

Just added the first Taj Mahal album and a Mississippi John Hurt disc to the collection, both strong albums in their styles. I can't believe I didn't have that Taj album, it's great funky blues. And Hurt is a great transfer technically, the stuff sounds like it was just recorded, but it's from 1928. I love that old multiple melody solo acoustic stuff, that's where I want to go in my current phase of playing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 12, 2006, 01:26:09 PM
that's where I want to go in my current phase of playing.

My Personal Update:  Still wishing I was Keith Richards. Electric, acoustic, whatever...


Also, my acoustic sucks.

Actually, it doesn't suck per se. It's just a plain jane Takamine dreadnought is all. I want a Jumbo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 13, 2006, 06:53:37 AM
Mine's a jumbo, an Alvarez. I loved it so much when I just had the Cort electric, but the SG has totally spoiled me. I played an incredible Taylor classical that was marked down to $900 from $1500, I came sooo close to buying it, I really wish I had. I've been hunting a classical for years.

Funny you mention the acoustic, I'm compiling a list of acoustic stuff to burn to give my instructor an idea of where I want to be on the acoustic. Here's the list so far:

Too Too Train Blues - Big Bill Broonzy
Brown Skin Shuffle - Big Bill Broonzy
Mistreatin' Mama Blues - Big Bill Broonzy
Catfish Blues - Buddy Guy & Junior Wells
Bukka's Jitterbug Swing - Bukka White
A Spoonful Blues - Charley Patton
Dimples In Your Jaws - Joe Lee, Boy Blue, Darnel Walker
Crawlin' King Snake - John Lee Hooker
Stagolee - Mississippi John Hurt
Rolling Stone - Muddy Waters
I Be's Troubled - Muddy Waters
Bowlegged Charlie - Otis Taylor
From 4 Until Late - Robert Johnson
Love In Vain - Robert Johnson
Rolled and Tumbled - Rosalie Hill
The Ponly Blues - Son House
Mississippi Blues - William Brown


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 13, 2006, 07:34:48 AM
On a scary note, I think I'm developing carpal tunnel in my left hand. Last week, I was waking up with sharp pains in my fingertips, which would carry on and off throughout the day. The past two days though I've been waking up with a sore in my bottom thumb/wrist area.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 14, 2006, 05:48:33 PM
Greatest white blues lineup ever (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H7TEIveNZY&search=rolling%20stones) (and Yoko Ono killing it, just like she did with the Beatles).



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 15, 2006, 06:25:45 AM
I must've missed Mike Bloomfield, Johnny Winter, Ry Cooder, Stevie Ray, Billy Gibbons, Peter Green, and that's just the start of the guitar section :P

Ok, I've never hated Yoko until now. Whoever let her and that violinist on stage needs to be kicked in the nuts, even if it was Lennon's idea. The first jam was nice, though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 15, 2006, 07:58:53 AM
I must've missed Mike Bloomfield, Johnny Winter, Ry Cooder, Stevie Ray, Billy Gibbons, Peter Green, and that's just the start of the guitar section :P

Heh, I was kidding really. But when Keith, Clapton, and Lennon are in the same song, it's hard to think of another link title.

Anyways....Funny thing about Yoko is that Lennon didn't start writing cool, depressing, earthy stuff until he met her. She's a double edged sword, I guess. Another song I can think of like that is Cold Turkey (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtcUEP6goZ0&search=john%20lennon%20cold%20turkey) (too bad that's the dubbed version).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 15, 2006, 11:32:46 AM
Man, I swear, Youtube has everything...

Gatemouth on a Jag (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkJkBorWQTM&mode=suggested&search=ry%20cooder)

More swingin' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szKnP17bR4Y&mode=suggested&search=ry%20cooder). So much style man.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 15, 2006, 11:45:03 AM
Heh, you're hurting my productivity, man.

The King (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4xhS3dPTdk&search=albert%20king)

The more of this stuff I watch, the more I think I'm going to cancel my guitar lessons. This instructor played some decent acoustic blues and has really gotten me on the right track for practicing better, but he keeps pushing me into jazz, which I hate. So far every decent instructor I've met is way too into jazz, and argues with me when I say blues shouldn't be tainted by jazz. Country delta blooze forever (with some Chicago spice), bitches!

I just need to practice more, is all. Screw these jazztards.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 15, 2006, 11:48:21 AM
Yeah, that one's great. Seen it (and watching it again now).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 15, 2006, 11:51:59 AM
blues shouldn't be tainted by jazz

That Gatemouth vid says otherwise. Though to be fair, that's New Orleans jazz. More sweaty, less smooth :)





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 15, 2006, 01:05:32 PM
I don't care for it.

Matt Murphy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDi9XdDamE8), all vintage-like.
My man Buddy Guy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5VmOPrmviA). Love his vocals and guitar style, very distinctive. Great saxomaphone.
Great video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grfp3iJ6czg) of T-Bone Walker with Willie Dixon, Memphis Slim and others. Dig those keys!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 15, 2006, 01:41:42 PM
Matt Murphy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDi9XdDamE8), all vintage-like.

Thank you for that.   :heart:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on June 15, 2006, 02:03:06 PM
Here's a fun guitarist in a quite different style - Porcupine Tree's Steven Wilson:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxeANJx8uho

And because he was mentioned... Kid Rock (skip ahead 3 mins of crap til Billy Gibbons):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJSi7vbNznA


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 19, 2006, 07:17:43 AM
Cancelled my lessons. As I said, screw jazztards. I just want to play blues, maybe some rock.

Just need to practice more, in the non-comfort zone. My hand aches from working on chord forms. I actually considered plastic surgery to slim down my fingertips (they are very wide). Only for a split-second, but the thought was there (damn you A chord form high on the neck!). I always hated physical limitations when I was college, I was at the point on the bass where I was pushing my physical limitations on how fast I could play with my fingers. I really miss the times I had 8 or more hours a day to practice and sit at the top of my game. It just sucks knowing I could be so much better than I am :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 19, 2006, 08:36:02 AM
I really miss the times I had 8 or more hours a day to practice and sit at the top of my game. It just sucks knowing I could be so much better than I am :)

I know exactly how you feel.  I've been listening to some studio stuff I did about 20 years ago and I can't even play my own licks.  It amazes me how much style and polish you get from just playing out all the time. 

As for the lessons, I think it's a good call.  There are so few instructors out there willing to teach what the student wants to learn that it's often a lost cause.  Use the cash you would have spent on lessons on cds instead.  With your level of self-discipline, you'll do well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 19, 2006, 09:44:21 AM
Quote
With your level of self-discipline, you'll do well.
I lolled. I have almost no self-discipline. That's why I started taking lessons.

I did quickly see several things to work on, chord vocab using the CAGED system was one. Of course, the book he wanted me to work out of was on my amazon wishlist for about two years  (Fretboard Logic, it's a great book and the source of my aching hand the other night), so it's not like it was some groundbreaking idea. Same with the fingerpicking acoustic blues, he was showing me stuff out of a book I already had.

So it's really that I just need to practice more :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 19, 2006, 09:51:39 AM
I lolled. I have almost no self-discipline. That's why I started taking lessons.

You had me fooled.  You're always talking about playing and trying new things here.  I tend to fall back into old patters and rarely stretch myself musically anymore.  That's where my comment came from.  You seem much more self-disciplined than I do musically. 

My latest stretch has been playing scales.  I've basically gone back to basics and took a look at some commonly used scales and reviewed my pentatonics.  I'm hoping that if I get these things ingrained in my head again, that I'll be able to vamp more around basic keys.  Sadly after about 20-30 mins, I just slam on a few cd's and start playing along.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 22, 2006, 11:50:52 AM
Just an update. Working with a couple books right now and thought I'd pass them along, as they are excellent.

Fretboard Logic (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0962477060/sr=8-2/qid=1151000799/ref=pd_bbs_2/104-5695724-7348745?%5Fencoding=UTF8) - I mentioned this one above. Nice way to put together the guitar's fretboard mentally. CAGED system, which I pretty much used subconsciously already. But studying it and putting it together with theory is cool. I just never thought about the fact I had been using the C form, and I didn't really use the G form much, but the C, A and D I had been using pretty extensively. The author then uses that simple system to build out chords anywhere on the neck spontaneously and then as a platform to learn scales and arpeggios. Good stuff.

Fretboard Workbook (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0634049011/ref=pd_bxgy_text_b/104-5695724-7348745?%5Fencoding=UTF8) - Similar to the above, by Musician's Institute Press. Same idea, substituting numbers 1-5 for C-D.

Berklee's Guitar Series v1 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0793545110/sr=1-2/qid=1151000954/ref=pd_bbs_2/104-5695724-7348745?%5Fencoding=UTF8&s=books) - The Beast. Guitar exercises, all in notation (I'm a recovering tabtard).

Mostly trying to learn notation and master the fretboard in all positions at this point. Funny how boring yet exciting something can be. Also working some repertoire development, open G slide on "Can't Be Satisfied" (http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=50:y9d7yz7jxpmb~T).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 20, 2006, 11:37:49 AM
Posted another track off the CD, an acoustic instrumental piece.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2006/08/20/the-sunday-song-after-the-flood/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 21, 2006, 07:55:21 AM
That was nice. Some of the arpeggios were a bit labored, but I really liked the little slides at the end of phrases.

Speaking of acoustic stuff, I'm very tempted to buy a Baby Taylor after playing one a couple weeks ago. I could've used one out on Monhegan Island last week. I missed out on a classic Taylor that was only $900, really bummed me out. To wrap up gear news, I'm also considering a Pignose amp.

My playing's been a bit stalled lately, but I've been working on a version of Catfish Blues I can actually sing, so it has to be artfully sparse because I can't play and sing at the same time. I throw in a lot of fills and I'm doing one line in unison with the guitar, which actually sounds very Hendrixy. I wish digital hard disk recorder tech would catch up to what I want. Right now it seems everything is mixed onboard at the low end or just a front end for the pc software at the high end. I want something totally integrated, so I can record without the pc on but mix on the pc. Ah, well. Maybe next year.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 21, 2006, 12:31:07 PM
I really do enjoy my Baby, though I don't play it hardly at all these days given that it sits at home and my main guitar is equally within reach. I tried a lot of travel guitars, and it was literally the only one with anything resembling a real tone. It also sounds better to the audience than it does to you, I've found.

Why can't you sing and play at the same time? Maybe you need to back up, play some simpler stuff and get the simultaneous singing and playing down a bit better, then work the guitar part complexity back up.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 21, 2006, 01:42:09 PM
I dunno, I've chalked it up to coordination difficulties. It's not so much I can't sing and play simultaneously as I can't do differing melodies/rhythms. Thus doing the unison thing with Catfish. I am trying some simple chording, it's no problem at all to strum chords as long as there isn't too much going on under a lyric. But something as simple as a shuffle blues? Not happening. I have a version of Kind Hearted Woman Blues I've been doing, based on George Thorogood's slide version (it's quite nice) with a shuffle inserted in a middle verse ("Ain't but one thing that make Mr. Johnson drink...."). I can do nice slide chording and fills but the shuffle defeats me every time.

It's the exact thing that happens to me on the drums when I can't play a straight high-hat line (like straight 8ths) while syncopating the bass drum. It's like the right hand and foot are connected or something.

Both problems bug the hell out of me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 21, 2006, 03:38:08 PM
Hmm. All I can think of is to try some basic rhythm sightreading exercises.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Sky on August 31, 2006, 11:54:11 AM
Is your SG a cherry red (like mine was), or the cooler brownish/maroon? I can't tell.
Heritage Cherry (http://gibson.com/Products%5FEuro/GibsonElectric/Gibson%20Electric%20Guitars/SG%20Specials/SG%20%5F61%20Reissue/) sez Gibson.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: stray on August 31, 2006, 12:10:49 PM
Is your SG a cherry red (like mine was), or the cooler brownish/maroon? I can't tell.
Heritage Cherry (http://gibson.com/Products%5FEuro/GibsonElectric/Gibson%20Electric%20Guitars/SG%20Specials/SG%20%5F61%20Reissue/) sez Gibson.

Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Much cooler version of cherry than mine was (which I sold). I'd like to get another like yours one day.

Ever seen this? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID2q35M5gk4)


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Sky on August 31, 2006, 01:39:58 PM
Keith Moon is one of the best drummer ever. Bonham is my favorite, though. Mitch Mitchell was awesome, too. I tend to really key in on drummers, probably from playing bass for so long.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Nebu on August 31, 2006, 02:05:16 PM
I own a dvd of that concert.  Damn I miss the Ox. 


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: stray on August 31, 2006, 02:15:47 PM
You guys are right about Entwistle and Moon, but the real star of the show is Townsend's windmill! It's never looked better.  :-P

Seriously, I love that kind of stuff. What's with SG players (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBcZpN05_lk&search=bon%20scott) anyways? They all seem to have more "show business" savvy than the average git player.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Engels on August 31, 2006, 02:18:48 PM
Is your SG a cherry red (like mine was), or the cooler brownish/maroon? I can't tell.
Heritage Cherry (http://gibson.com/Products%5FEuro/GibsonElectric/Gibson%20Electric%20Guitars/SG%20Specials/SG%20%5F61%20Reissue/) sez Gibson.

Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Much cooler version of cherry than mine was (which I sold). I'd like to get another like yours one day.



Are you using Marschall tube amps with that SG? Cuz if you're not, you're not really playing an SG! Sorry, had to add 70s metal guitar freak to my list of strange fetishes


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: stray on August 31, 2006, 02:37:07 PM
I worship at the altar of 70's guitar gods -- But as far as playing goes, that sound is just not me. I've had a couple of Marshalls before, but never really liked them. The amp I have now is a Fender VK, which can do the "Marshall" thing better than other Fender amps, but I use it for other reasons. Anything sounds great through it. It's versatile enough for everyone from the present day Townsend (Marshall poster boy and cabinet destroyer if there ever was one) to completely opposite players like Dick Dale and Chris Isaak to use.

I also have a Vox amp modeler, if that counts. It has Marshall Bluesbreakers, Plexis, and 80's, 90's, and 00 stack models on it. I was dialing them in from time to time when I had a Gibson to muck around with.

Or are you asking Sky? If so, then I'm gonna feel like an ass for saying all of that then. :)


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2006, 07:17:38 AM
Hmm. My guitar gods are all over the place. Priest, Maiden, Mercyful Fate, Zakk, Dime, Iommi over to Buddy Guy, Muddy, Albert King, Johnny Winter to Jimi, Page, Clapton, Gilmour, etc, etc. I basically like good guitars over interesting music. I'm not picky, though I'm picky in a way, which is not intended to be a pun on picking.

I'm playing a cheap old bass head a guy sold me when I moved back from CA and my guitarist decided to keep my rig. One guy sold me a nice 8x10 Ampeg cab I'm not currently using (and one 10 needs replaced) for $100. Another guy sold me an old Peavey Mark III bass head (crappy model without the graphic eq, but it's serviceable) and a 1x15 (nice Dean Markley cab) loaded with a 400W EV 15", my old favorite speaker from when I played bass. My main rig was a Peavey 2x15 with two of those in it, back in the day. Crunchy. Got the amp head and cab for $100, too.

So I'm running into a Boss GT-6 I bought but don't really know how to use properly, thence into the Peavey bass amp into the 1x15.

The sound in that clip was my default metal lead sound, something with distortion and some echo and verb. I normally use a very dry sound with just a hint of overdrive, I'm tempted to pull the GT-6 out of the loop and just use the amp's gain circuit. I'm a pretty firm believer in pulling good sound out of whatever you're plugged into. I didn't use any effects when I played bass, just an ancient Kustom guitar head (that used to be our singer's amp before we had a PA!) into the 2x15. It's mostly in the fingers and attack. I used to beat the shit out of the bass when I played, last time I played in public a couple years ago I played three songs and my fingers were literally bleeding, it was very gorey (and kinda cool, heh).

That said, I'd love to have a marshall tube stack! I'd have to sell my truck to afford it, though....I've been looking at some combo amps, a couple decent looking fenders, maybe a 4x10 super reverb. Also toying with the idea of grabbing a Pignose amp.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: stray on September 01, 2006, 08:02:47 AM
I would recommend the Super Reverb. The only Fender combo better than it is the VK, imho. But that's about a $1000 more and doesn't do bright and clean as well as an SR. Have you played your guitar through one already? Since you're a plug and play kind of guy, I'd think you'd be really happy with it for sure. Even with your SG, it might take a lot of volume to push it into hard overdrive, but if you like crunchy-clean, it's perfect.

There's also the Deluxe Reverb. It's more than half the wattage and half the price. It has a similar sound to an SR, but if you want it to saturate at lower volumes (like small club/garage levels), that's what it's good for.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Llava on September 01, 2006, 08:35:31 AM
Didn't one of you guys just say earlier in this very thread that you're "no guitar geek"?

How do you defend a statement like that after this discussion?


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Engels on September 01, 2006, 09:09:30 AM
Stray, I was talking to both of ya. I'm no longer a guitar geek, so most of what you talked about went over my head. However, for arty lines, wicked sounds and a clean flat neck, you just can't get better than an SG. If I were to seriously pick up playing again, I would lust after the SG.

As for amps, I never managed to pony up enough for a marshall tube. You're right that it does tend to be very limited in what sounds it can make, and I did have a Fender Blackwidow amp, which had a lot of built-in toys, including chorus and flange, which were a hoot to play with.

Regrettably, I had to put the guitar down and admit defeat. I just have no musical ear and my sense of rhythm sucks. Badly. I'm the kind of dancer that makes white people think they have a some black in them because at least they aren't as bad as I am.


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2006, 09:58:47 AM
I know what I wrote /sounds/ guitar geeky, even when we get into some discussion of modes and stuff in the Guitar Thread (which some mod should probably split this into :P). But not really.

A guitar geek knows how to download custom GT6 sounds and hack his GT6. Fuck, a guitar geek would know how to work the stupid thing properly. I have maybe 4 tones I ever use out of 200, and I haven't done any custom tones of my own.

A guitar geek would actually care that he made mistakes in that video or maybe discuss how I overused pentatonics and maybe praise my integration of melodic minors and blues pentatonics or summat. I just play and whatever comes out is what it is :)

Basically, I don't get too hung up in technical stuff, theory or gear. I do enjoy talking about it, though, so I won't deny a bit of geekism in that respect. I'd say 'enthusiast', though ;)


Title: Re: Useless Videos
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 01, 2006, 10:02:52 AM
Quote
(which some mod should probably split this into Tongue). But not really.

Was planning on it. Gotta keep you guitar geeks somewhere I can safely ignore you  :-D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 01, 2006, 10:49:10 AM
I don't know a lot about theory, but I guess I'm a guitar geek. More like a tone freak really. I'm probably better at that than I am playing. I don't wind my own pickups or anything, but I do like to tweak things to an extent. Outside of major modifications, I work on my own stuff. I can be pretty obsessive over less-than-optimal guitar setups, if the pickups are 1 cm too high, or lame amplifier speakers, and fix them accordingly. I can operate a GT6, but I'm more geeky in an analog kind of way. I tend to not like digital stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2006, 11:12:32 AM
I used to be into that stuff when I had a full studio at my disposal. I guess it's a whole shift in my perspective since I got back into playing.

I got real lucky when I bought the SG, the shop's setup guy was there and had just finished setting it up (and several others). He walked me through stuff, watched how I played, he was a great help assisting me. He got a kick out of how I insisted on playing about 40 guitars before I'd plug any in. I had it narrowed to the SG and a nice little strat before I ever plugged them in, because I wanted a sweet fretboard.

I might have to pull out the 8x10 this weekend and see if I can rig it up to play through 2 of them for a practice cab ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 01, 2006, 11:34:38 AM
Ah, here's another cool SG vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUHz0i8_ziA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUHz0i8_ziA)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2006, 12:28:25 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-twUOi1CM0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjYOXcWz_Uk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkbMd3Bygzs - nice bonus, Geez is playing a Ricky bass. I had a chance to borrow one of those when my old bass got stolen, they're such great bass guitars (though they do lack some frets up top)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Abc2WoORw54 - Not sure what kind of SG Frank is playing


FYI this is NOT me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkNAZcF18NA :) Ouch.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 01, 2006, 01:44:09 PM
Cool vids. I was checking out some of those, but couldn't decide what to post.

I wish there were vids of the Wipers. Greg Sage is my favorite SG player by far.

...

Moving away from SG's for a sec, I was looking up examples of cool Jazzmaster players. Too many Sonic Youth and Dinosaur Jr. vids to sift from; I don't have the time. And there was hardly any video footage of Television back in the day.

I found this gem (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHpBOhwXMak) though.

Not sure if that's anybody else's kind of thing, but as far as I'm concerned, that's the shit. That's a perfect Jazzmaster song if there ever was one. Never heard of those guys before (of course, it's a 60's Lounge band from Belgium....So I guess I wouldn't).

[edit]

You mean to tell me there's another guy named "Sky" on Youtube posting faceless vids of himself playing his SG?



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on September 01, 2006, 02:55:16 PM
Basically, this seems to me like knowing all the events in the Lord of the Rings, having read the Silmarillon, knowing Aragorn's lineage and all the regions of Middle-Earth, but because you only speak a little Sindarin and no Quenya you don't consider yourself a Lord of the Rings geek.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 01, 2006, 05:09:03 PM
I think I'm just the type of person who, when he/she likes something, likes it in a totally obsessive way. I have no casual hobbies or interests. I geek out on all of them.

MMO's are one of the things I often wish I could pull away from though. :D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on September 01, 2006, 08:06:05 PM
I should clarify that I'm not mocking you on this.  I'm certainly a geek on many worse things, and there's no doubt that if you're going to geek out about something, guitar is one of the few that'll get you laid.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Engels on September 08, 2006, 09:38:58 AM
More SG goodness from Seattle's all-women AC/DC cover band. Chose this particular track because its got better sound than most. Its still bootleg quality.

Semi NSFW due to semi-topless guitarist

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rNcOSAE-RM&mode=related&search=



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 08, 2006, 03:35:46 PM
Heh, too bad the singer adopts Johnson's manner and garb instead of Bon Scott's.


Scott makes a funny chick (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VlRUIHwygc) btw.  :-D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 12, 2006, 10:19:22 AM
Funny:

The "better" version of Third Stone. (http://home.earthlink.net/~kthompsen/Third_Stone_from_the%20Sun.mp3)

I finally listened to my entire Hendrix box set and came across that. Is that a well known clip or what? I know it's basically the same track, but I never heard it before.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 16, 2006, 09:38:19 PM
Ah, how could I forget this? I ran across this vid awhile back. Very cool.

Sister Rosetta Sharpe and her Pearly Gates SG (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xzr_GBa8qk).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on September 16, 2006, 10:34:11 PM
Scott makes a funny chick (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VlRUIHwygc) btw.  :-D

If you like that, you should buy the Family Jewels (http://www.cdconnection.com/details/Ac/Dc__Family_Jewels_(2pc)_/_(Rmst_Dig)/1017712) DVD, which is split evenly across two discs between Scott & Johnson periods.

Fuck SGs. '59 Les Paul (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-940116725401968736)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 16, 2006, 11:36:21 PM
Oh, I love LP's too. They're pretty heavy, but I'm not complaining (To speak of something totally silly, I've always thought that a Black LP would seal the deal for me as a rock star. Haha. They look perfect on me. Now if I just knew how to sound like a rock star, I'd be set ;) ).

Soundwise, both SG's and LP's aren't totally my thing, but there are times when I wish had one or the other around. Over the years, I've purchased several mahogany/humbucker guitars (Gibson or Gibson like SG's, LP and 335 copies, double cutaways), but I have a bad habit of selling them off. Next time I get one, I plan on keeping it.

....

Jimmy Page seems to look more and more Chinese with age. Is he part Chinese? I wonder now. Not long ago, I found out that the Van Halen brothers AND Zak from Saved By the Bell (yeah, the blonde guy) are part Indonesian. Surprised me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 18, 2006, 09:38:15 AM
I guess you could see it in Alex, he always looked a bit odd.

I'm all about the SG sound, with whatever pickups are in my 61 reiss. One of the first guitars I tried when I was shopping was a Black Beauty LP, but it was like trying to fret a baseball bat. Which was cool by me since it was also $4k. The thin, wide neck of the 61 SG is just too sweet for bending imo.

Just got back from vacation playing just my Alvarez acoustic/electric and my fingers are just recovering. Shredded them and then built up monster callus. It was great for building strength for bends and chords, especially since I'm trying to work on the CAGED system I've mentioned, which seems to be very cool.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 18, 2006, 11:46:51 AM
I remember playing a Gibson Explorer and an ES 325 when I was working in the 80's.  Neither belonged to me, but I really enjoyed their sound and how well they played.  I've never spent much time on an SG, is the neck much different than the Explorer? I remember both of them being more comfortable to my bass-player hands than the Telecaster I owned. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on September 18, 2006, 12:54:01 PM
I need to learn that CAGED system, i bought the book recommended further up the thread but havent really had any decent time with it yet. My latest guitar is finally back in action after i broke the output jack some time ago. I bought a replacement and soldering iron today and got it working and am pleased i bothered to do myself instead of taking it in.

I have problems with its tuning tho, its loses tune within seconds when im tuning, and i re-do over and over for 5 mins or so  and then it keeps it for a few sessions. Its a wilkinson trem, not a locking nut/floyd rose setup. I suspect i have too much string wrapped around the tuners, would that do it ? I think the innotation is ok. It's also used (toured with even) and is a bit battered.

 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on September 18, 2006, 12:57:02 PM
Jimmy Page seems to look more and more Chinese with age. Is he part Chinese? I wonder now. Not long ago, I found out that the Van Halen brothers AND Zak from Saved By the Bell (yeah, the blonde guy) are part Indonesian. Surprised me.

There are rumours that he has some Chinese blood, though they're unsubstantiated as far as I know. I suspect its more likely that the majick rituals haven't been doing their job and he's had to resort to a little nip/tuck. :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 18, 2006, 01:25:50 PM
I remember playing a Gibson Explorer and an ES 325 when I was working in the 80's.  Neither belonged to me, but I really enjoyed their sound and how well they played.  I've never spent much time on an SG, is the neck much different than the Explorer? I remember both of them being more comfortable to my bass-player hands than the Telecaster I owned. 


Most Gibson necks fall under the same category. The original Gibson design was borrowed from acoustic guitars (fat neck profile, 12" radius, etc.).

The SG, however, has a slim tapered neck (more akin to Fender), but retains the 12" radius (Fenders usually have a 7-9" radius). It's kind of a cross between the Fender and LP feel. This only goes for 60's reissues though (as well as Angus and Iommi models, which are based on the 60's design). Modern SG's feel more like Les Pauls and have fatter necks (though they are much lighter).

Anyways, to answer your question: A modern SG will feel more like that Explorer or 325 you played, but a 61 reissue, like Sky has, won't.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 18, 2006, 04:14:23 PM
Anyways, to answer your question: A modern SG will feel more like that Explorer or 325 you played, but a 61 reissue, like Sky has, won't.

Thanks!

Now the 2h drive to Denver to give it a whirl.  I've set aside money for a new 6 string, I just haven't found anything that screamed "BUY ME" yet.  I played a Schecter and a Les Paul studio, but I rather prefered my old G&L.  Maybe I should just buy a strat from the late 70s or early 80s.  A good compromise were the early Ibanez guitars.  Very similar feel for a fraction of the price.  The hard part is finding an early 80's Ibanez that wasn't beat to shreds as a backup. 

The only guitar that has really tempted me in the last 6 months was a 1978 Rickenbacker bass... I played one through the 80's (like everyone else) and miss the tone.  I like the feel of my Jazz, but I miss that Rick-o-sound.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 18, 2006, 05:23:56 PM
I wouldn't recommend 70's or 80's Strats really.  :-) Your G&L is more than likely much, much better. Same goes for Ernie Ball: Whereever Leo went, the guitars were better Fenders than Fender's (Standout Fenders from the 70's were the Tele Deluxes, Tele Customs, and the Basses though. Not the Strats. Standout Fenders from the 80's were the Japanese ones, both for price and that they didn't try to change the original designs too much, as the Americans did).

[edit]

I must say though, unless you're set on getting a vintage Strat, you're much better off with a new one. Especially the '62 reissue. They're awesome guitars. No Strat from the 70's is going to match it in quality. Besides actually having a real 62 Strat (which I think will run about 30 or 40 thousand dollars these days), it's as good as a Strat can be.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 19, 2006, 12:45:38 AM
Thanks Stray.  Excellent advice as always!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 19, 2006, 06:37:48 AM
I'd love a Ricky bass, too. At this point I'd consider trading up my ESP Custom bass for one, since I don't think I need more than one bass in my lineup. I would like a nice standup, but those are a bit pricey for a secondary instrument (these days). I'm still toying with the idea of a Baby Taylor, but I can't get over the decision-hump on it. I don't really need another steel-string acoustic, but it would be nice to have in the office...

At this point I'm balancing urges for an iPod 80GB, a hard disk recorder unit, and building a new pc next februaryish (which will cost a bundle). I'd like to get the recorder this winter if I can swing it, but as I've mentioned before the market is kinda odd. Doesn't seem to be a unit to do exactly what I'd like, fully functioning unit that can also bounce individual tracks to the pc for the mixing stage. They seem to either be pc interfaces (I don't want to have to boot my pc every time I want to jot an idea down) or only able to burn to cd or bounce a fully mixed stereo track over. Also on the wishlist is a drum machine for scratch tracks (I can play drums enough to lay the final) and a nice vintage wooden metronome (which I've found aren't cheap).

I did splurge and get a little pignose with some leftover vacation fundage ;) Hope to have it in by the weekend.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on September 20, 2006, 07:01:03 PM
Just get a portable flash recorder like an Edirol R-09 or M-Audio MicroTrack 24/96 and use that instead of an iPod.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 22, 2006, 08:30:58 AM
Those are cool but still don't quite fit the bill. I need a couple more tracks and better monitoring, as well as bouncing. For instance, if I have a bass track, a guitar track, a scratch drum machine track and I'm laying down the drums on another track. I'd love to have a flash recorder for jotting down ideas, but that'd have to come after a more fully-featured recorder.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on September 22, 2006, 08:49:36 AM
Those are cool but still don't quite fit the bill. I need a couple more tracks and better monitoring, as well as bouncing. For instance, if I have a bass track, a guitar track, a scratch drum machine track and I'm laying down the drums on another track. I'd love to have a flash recorder for jotting down ideas, but that'd have to come after a more fully-featured recorder.

What about something like this (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Korg-D4-4Track-Digital-Recording-Studio?sku=242060) or this (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR8HD-8Track-Digital-Recorder-with-40GB-Hard-Drive?sku=240341)?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 22, 2006, 09:20:28 AM
Yeah, I'm familiar with all the current hard disk recorders out there right now, I think. They're all just a bit lacking, and that's a lot of dough (imo) to drop on something that doesn't quite do what I want. I keep holding out hoping someone makes what I'm looking for, but I'm not sure it'll happen. It's academic right now anyway, truck is in the shop and I'm broke :)

Ideally, it'd be a fully-functioning recording unit (we used to have a tascam 8 channel for demos, but we also had a studio setup with a 24 channel board we fed into it, so I'm a little picky on features) that could be mounted as a hard drive on the pc/mac to be worked from in the full featured recording package (pro tools, eventually), importing individual tracks discreetly. There are some decent units way up high, but that's more than I want to spend on an intermidiate unit, it's in the price range of the Digi002 I hope to buy when I put the studio in my house (that I haven't found yet, heh).

I'll probably end up buying the Fostex at some point, though. Seems to be the only choice for a low-end unit, really.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 03, 2006, 08:14:28 AM
Been playing around with the pignose amp for a while now. Great little amp, has a nice tone to it and really shines when I hook up the Boss GT-6. I've been playing long enough to have messed aroung with the onboard tone and volume settings on my guitars, but the pignose really puts that out front, because it doesn't have much, just the one volume knob. I can set it pretty loud and a little distorted and with the onboard controls shape the sound from fingerpicking rhythm to lead tones.

Hooking up the effects unit makes it a perfect practice amp, actually a bit loud (according to my girlfriend). Oddly, I could play quieter on my amp + 15" cab. *shrug*

The only downside is a noticeable hum, especially at low volume. Trying to isolate it, at first I had thought it was the flourescent bulbs I've been using, but it's not.

Anyway, for $75 or so, can't go wrong. Can't wait to try it with batteries, it has little bolts for a guitar strap, too. I've got an old Pantera video with Dimebag out on the street using this amp to play blues and beg for money.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 06, 2006, 02:41:54 PM
I know you said you didn't want to boot up a PC in order to lay down ideas, but for now if you want to do more than 4 tracks without bouncing it really is the best way to go.

You can get a copy of Sonar bundled with a Firewire audio interface for right around the $550 level.  It's totally worth the money.  You can record two mics and four line sources simultaneously (which I have found to be more than enough for most projects), and you can even connect it to a laptop for quick takes when out somewhere.  You can put hundreds of tracks in (provided you have the CPU horsepower) along with some really nice effects package (like Sonitus).

I just haven't found an all inclusive unit that offers the same amount of editing and tracking flexibility for a comparable cost.  I was using the Boss (e.g. Roland) unit and although it is nice and portable, you'll go out of your mind trying to fix mixes after you have bounced a few times.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on October 13, 2006, 09:09:05 PM
Gear envy time again. Saw Porcupine Tree last week. As well as incorporating gorgeous Les Pauls into their arsenal for the first time, they also used these new Babicz Octanes. They sure do sound and look nice:

(http://www.studiomlive.com/artists/porcupinetree1006/images/_DSC9730.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 14, 2006, 02:49:01 AM
Those are nice. Even the introductory model is nice (The Spider (http://www.babiczguitars.com/spider.shtml)). Only in the $600 range too. I want one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on October 23, 2006, 03:36:53 PM
I traded in my Yamaha Strat and got myself a Pod XT Live. I was actually after the XT but the Live has come down in price and with the trade in worked out very cheap.  I've not bought any proper kit like this before, it even came with a ringbinder manual, which really appealed to the inner geek in me.

It's already changed so much, just having access to so many (128 presets you can programme or download to) tones and fx at the press of a pedal opens up so many more possibilities. Best still, i can just use it with headphones, as i'm in a small flat with thin walls..... according to the neighbours, heh. I've been playing with some user created sounds from customtone.com (http://www.customtone.com). various tones that sound like pantera, slayer, metalica etc. Mainly using a Burzum one tonight, but I won't be burning any churches down any time soon.

The next step is using it and the Line 6 software to interface with some means to record, and play over backing tracks, and I really must structure my learning on the guitar. I've more or less been playing for fun but now im at the stage I can hear stuff in my head that i just can't play.


 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 23, 2006, 08:02:59 PM
Took me awhile to play the stuff I was hearing in my head (and frankly, I still can't do it well after over 15 years of playing. Most of the songs I make up are just snippets of what I heard in my head --- I flesh the rest out with whatever my fingers want to do). So....Just have fun, like you're doing.

Pods are cool. Grats on the purchase. I used to have one, but I've since purchased a Vox/Valvetronix amp. Same principle, but it has better Vox and Marshall models than the Pod (Pod does other brands better.....Plus, it has custom cabinet configuration....While the Vox doesn't).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on October 23, 2006, 08:49:10 PM
Just picked up one of these (http://www.seagullguitars.com/products6+cedargt.htm) from my buddies brother for a decent price. Just wondering if you guys knew of any good resources for learning? I was learning to play and then my old acoustic fell to shit. It was something someone dumped on me. Esteban quality kinda guitar. Finally got around to picking up a new one and lost all my resources for learning acoustic.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 23, 2006, 11:24:15 PM
Lol, Esteban.

If possible, the best thing you can do is find an experienced guitar player (even someone who has played for a year or two) to strum songs with. Nothing beats learning that way.

If you're completely on your own, then learn the basic chords (if you haven't already) and get some kind of songbook. Learn through songs. The most important lessons are understanding the different sounds chords make (your ear), getting physically comfortable shaping those chords (your left hand), and getting a sense of rhythm (your right hand). Songs will help you with all three.

Stay away from bland/esoteric theory for the moment. Without an understand of songs, that shit is a vacuum.

I'll leave it up you about which songs to learn, but I'd suggest oldies. They lend themselves better to learning on an acoustic. Songs like Bad Moon Rising by CCR, No Reply by the Beatles, Knockin' On Heaven's Door by Bob Dylan. Beautifully simplistic songs.

If you had an electric, I'd just tell you to learn Iron Man and the Ramones' Commando. You'd be well on your way to rock stardom from there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 24, 2006, 07:02:29 AM
Esteban was the only flamenco instruction I could find in a store :| Looking at his picture and the packaging, I passed on it and went online and found some decent rasgeudo (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0786649224/ref=pd_cp_b_title/102-8653668-0511355?ie=UTF8) (sp) instruction books to slap on ye olde wishe liste. I'd like to flesh out my flamenco a bit because I'm pretty decent at the couple of things I've conjured from my anus, some celtic guys I jammed with a couple months ago were calling me the flamenco guy. Of course, I'm no Esteban or even a Charo (she rocks on guitar).

I'm completely inept as a teacher, though. I learned by smoking copious amounts of pot, drinking Yukon Jack, and jamming with friends who were also trying to learn. We sucked for at least a year or two, but it sure was fun.

I guess maybe one of the Travis picking books (http://www.amazon.com/Art-Contemporary-Travis-Picking-Fingerpicking/dp/0936799005/sr=8-1/qid=1161698292/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8653668-0511355?ie=UTF8&s=books) would be a good place to start with an acoustic. Fretboard Logic (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-Reasoning-Arpeggios-Complete/dp/0962477060/ref=pd_bxgy_d_text_b/102-8653668-0511355?ie=UTF8) is a great book to wrap your head around the fingerboard, I'm working through that one now. Wish I'd had it when I was starting out. This general book (http://www.amazon.com/Play-Acoustic-Complete-Mastering-Guitar/dp/0879308532/sr=8-1/qid=1161698667/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-8653668-0511355?ie=UTF8&s=books[/url) has some nice ideas, but it's a bit light. There's a few pages on different genres, bluegrass, celtic, blues, rock, folk, etc, but the first half of the book is prose about acoustic guitarists so it's not all instruction.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 24, 2006, 05:28:26 PM
Ack, don't start with Travis picking. Start with plain old chords. D, C, G, E, A, Em, Dm, Am. Then when you hit the "hard ones" like Bb, F, and B7, you'll feel  like a god. :) And you can stack Travis-style on top of this basic knowledge.

I learned off of songbooks for old folk songs and for singer-songwriters. Pick the music you like, though, you want songs you know in your bones so that you can hear what you're shooting for.

BTW, any acoustic guitarist should grab "Rise Up Singing" (the spiral-bound one, of course) -- yeah, it's got a ton of shit you don't want. But it's also guaranteed to have dozens you do want to learn, plus dozens more you've at least heard. And it's portable, and you'll be armed for playing when someone asks you to play something, because it does have something for damn ner everyone. Just ignore the hippie vibe. :) http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Up-Singing-Songbook-Anniversary/dp/1881322122/ref=ed_oe_o/102-9784383-0470531?ie=UTF8



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 24, 2006, 05:49:35 PM
Hell, I can barely do Travis picking very well after the length that I've been playing.

I blame it on being a lefty who learned on a righty though ;). In some cases, this can be a benefit. In others, it can be a real problem.

Either way, it's a bit advanced. I agree.

Just get basic chords and rhythms down. Your only goal right now should be getting used to fingering chords/pressing down on frets, getting every string to ring clearly throughout a chord, transitioning between chords clearly, and not sounding so sketchy when you strum.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on October 24, 2006, 08:31:40 PM
Another of my cousin's pieces:
http://travisaustin.bluedomino.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/downtherabbithole.mp3

Again, heavily Satriani/Vai inspired, so you ain't gonna like it if you don't like them.  Not my style personally, but some people here might enjoy it.

(It's all him, no other people.)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 24, 2006, 08:53:51 PM
Not my thing either, but I thought it was pretty cool. I think he'd sound 10 times more impressive ripping it up within a more raw/rockin' song.

Then again, the same would go for Steve Vai and Satriani as well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on October 24, 2006, 10:49:09 PM
Made me think of it because his name is Travis.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on October 24, 2006, 11:17:13 PM
I found some instructional videos online that's teaching notes. Figured it would be a better start than just learning off tabs. Right now I'm learning to play Ode To Joy. YAY!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 26, 2006, 07:13:09 AM
If you want to learn theory 'the right way', I suggest Berklee's stuff, starting with this one:

http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Method-Guitar/dp/0793545110/

I'll see Raph's oddball collection and raise you a cowboy campfire songbook:

http://www.amazon.com/Cowboy-Campfire-Songs-Tab-Guitar/dp/1569221464/

It's got some popular stuff like Clementine. I like the grim tone of the lyrics in songs like Bury Me Not On The Lone Prairie.
Quote
Ack, don't start with Travis picking.
I dunno, I did mention I'm not good with teaching :P Unless my suggestion to find a few mates, get piss drunk and have at some music is good teaching...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Damn Dirty Ape on October 26, 2006, 02:31:40 PM
This is a cool thread.

I did mention I'm not good with teaching :P Unless my suggestion to find a few mates, get piss drunk and have at some music is good teaching...

That's the way I learned my first few chords.  My step-father and his brothers would cook fish in a cauldron, get all liquored up, and play bluegrass on Saturday night.  Of course, I was too young at the time to drink but it's the thought that counts.

I'm still pretty much a n00b on guitar.  I play sporadically but I love it and enjoy instruments themselves as works of art.  Currently, I've got a Rickenbacker 4003 bass, a Geddy Lee signature Fender Jazz bass, and a 60th anniversary Fender Strat that I just picked up a couple of months ago.  The Ric is in bad need of repairs with a stripped-thread volume knob and bridge screw.   I could probably replace the volume knob myself but I'd like to get someone with experience to work on the bridge, perhaps replacing it with a Bad Ass.

Here's a video from Dead Meadow, a band I'm currently digging mightily at the moment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2SnG7iE4c4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2SnG7iE4c4)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 26, 2006, 02:48:57 PM
Heh. For a second there, I thought you said you were gigging with Dead Meadow (as in, you were in Dead Meadow).  :-D

But yeah, cool band.

...

Those are cool instruments for a "n00b". What year is that Ric? Is it old and beat up, or just fairly new and in need of repairs?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Damn Dirty Ape on October 26, 2006, 03:07:06 PM
Heh. For a second there, I thought you said you were gigging with Dead Meadow (as in, you were in Dead Meadow).  :-D

I wish.  Given their sound, I imagine they tour in their Mystery Machine, solving groovy mysteries along the way.

Quote
Those are cool instruments for a "n00b". What year is that Ric? Is it old and beat up, or just fairly new and in need of repairs?

It's an '85 model.  I bought it used back in '95 from an evangelist who was hesitant to sell it to a long-haired hippie type but I won him over in the end.  It played without a single problem up until about two years ago, and that's when I decided to pack it up and get the Jazz bass.  I prefer the bottom end sound of the Jazz over the Ric, but no other bass cuts through mid and high ranges like a Ric can.  I'm a big sucker for that Chris Squire/Geddy Lee type sound.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on October 26, 2006, 03:20:58 PM
This is a cool thread.

I did mention I'm not good with teaching :P Unless my suggestion to find a few mates, get piss drunk and have at some music is good teaching...

That's the way I learned my first few chords.  My step-father and his brothers would cook fish in a cauldron, get all liquored up, and play bluegrass on Saturday night.  Of course, I was too young at the time to drink but it's the thought that counts.

I'm still pretty much a n00b on guitar.  I play sporadically but I love it and enjoy instruments themselves as works of art.  Currently, I've got a Rickenbacker 4003 bass, a Geddy Lee signature Fender Jazz bass, and a 60th anniversary Fender Strat that I just picked up a couple of months ago.  The Ric is in bad need of repairs with a stripped-thread volume knob and bridge screw.   I could probably replace the volume knob myself but I'd like to get someone with experience to work on the bridge, perhaps replacing it with a Bad Ass.

Here's a video from Dead Meadow, a band I'm currently digging mightily at the moment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2SnG7iE4c4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2SnG7iE4c4)

Nice axes (particularly the Ric - love those things, but they're too pricey for me), and many thanks for the YouTube link/band recommendation - good stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on October 27, 2006, 06:11:34 PM
Just discovered this online jam app tonight, thought was worth a mention.

http://www.ninjam.com/

Just had a long jam with a friend, and it worked well. Had it set up in minutes, I ran the server and my own client, and just used pod via usb and set ninjam's input and output to asio and it was ready to go.

Anyone else tried this type of thing? This was near the top of a google search, but noticed some others too.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 27, 2006, 11:50:53 PM
There used to be something called the Rocket(?) Network. Something like that. You could jam, but it was mainly used for collaborating. It was bundled with a stripped down version of Logic (when Logic was owned by Logic, and not by Apple).

This is pretty cool though.

I'm still strapped for mics, but I might have something crappy lying around for input. I'd love to jam with you guys.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on November 18, 2006, 10:45:55 PM
Alrighty, so I just bought myself a Spencer acoustic. Nothing fancy.

I also don't know how to play guitar. I can play the piano, so I figured I could pick up the guitar no-problem. Turns out my music reading skill has atrophed mightily, so I've turned to tabs. I've fooled around with them a bit, but my biggest problem is moving my uncoordinated left hand around the neck in to hit the next chord in time. Do you experienced guitar players have any tips for easy tabs of recognizable songs for an acoustic guitar?

I listen to mostly classic rock, so those are really the songs I know best. Furthermore, my not-so-distant goal is to be able to play "Kiss Me" by Sixpence None the Richer for my wife. She loves that song. I do alright until I hit the chords that look similar to this on a tablature:

0            3
1            3
2            4
3            5
-            5
1            3

Could anyone help me out with the fingering of those?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2006, 05:14:41 AM
Them be barre chords...

A little hard to form for a newbie, but it's merely a physical thing. Takes practice is all I can say. Your index finger needs to lie flat, straight down on the fretboard:

(http://www.electric-guitar.co.uk/Images/Lessons/Barre_Chords/gminphoto.jpg)

That's a picture of a G barre chord (edit: wait, he's lifting up his middle finger, so in actuality it's a G minor....same basic concept though):

3
3
4
5
5
3

====================

Here's another way to break it down:

3 -- Index finger, 1st string, 3rd fret
3 -- Index finger, 2nd string, 3rd fret
4 -- Middle finger, 3rd string, 4th fret
5 -- Pinky finger, 4th string, 5th fret
5 -- Ring finger, 5th string, 5th fret
3 -- Index finger, 6th string, 3rd fret


Note, "6th string" means the big, bass string, and "1st string" means the thinnest string. Standard numbering conventions count from bottom to top, high notes to low.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Big Gulp on November 19, 2006, 06:22:55 AM
Suck on it, Muddy Waters! (http://www.desktopblues.lichtlabor.ch/)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on November 19, 2006, 12:17:19 PM
Hey Stray, thanks for the help - that picture was extra useful. I will point out that I'm not so much of a newb that I don't know which strings are which :)

I'm having a lot of fun learning how to play the guitar. I already know how to read music, so thats bonus, but I am not familiar with the chords and such so I can't read fast enough to play at speed. That's why tabs are a godsend.

Thanks again Stray.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2006, 12:38:18 PM
No prob.

Heh, when I said newb, I was only referring to the "dexterous" aspect of guitar playing. ;)

Since you have experience with pianos, you more than halfway there, as far as music making goes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on November 19, 2006, 05:16:37 PM
Another question for you Stray:

I've had more luck with fingerpicking style than chord songs so far. For instance, Classical Gas is something I would think that I'd never be able to play. I was bored, though, and found a tab and after a hour or so of practice I can play through the intro and into some of the first verse. Maybe I should learn more about that style of playing? Know of any good online references for that kind of stuff? Also, I'd really like to learn a bit about the blues style so that I can sit and do a lot of improv, but I've yet to find a site for that stuff with good info.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2006, 06:05:19 PM
I'm a pretty shitty fingerstyle player, so I'm the last to ask there. I can get by alright, but I'm a lefty who learned righty -- my picking/right hand technique is lacking.

Whether you like fingerstyling or not though, you'll still have to learn chords. It's fundamental. Even with fingerstyling, you're still forming chord shapes with your left hand.

As for Blues...Hmm, I don't know any online sources really. There's a nice little book though called "101 Must Know Blues Licks" (http://www.amazon.com/Must-Know-Blues-Licks-Wolf-Marshall/dp/0793595878/sr=8-1/qid=1163988372/ref=sr_1_1/002-6183995-7351264?ie=UTF8&s=books) that charts riffs and lines from pre-war Charlie Christian/Robert Johnson type blues to Delta style to Memphis to early British rock. It's cheap, helpful, and comes with a CD as well. It's a good way to learn blues lead concepts (through riffs, instead of indirectly through pentatonic theory).

Some groundwork needs to be laid though -- mainly physical stuff. You need to get comfortable bending strings, learning how to do hammer ons and slides smoothly. That sort of thing.

All that being said, the first thing you should do is just learn basic rock songs you like. You mentioned Classic Rock earlier -- Can you give a specific example? Sabbath? Zep? Neil Young? The Beatles? Punk?


Either way, many rock rhythms can be played or imitated with power chords (especially hard rock, metal, and punk). Power chords are just basic 2 or 3 string chords.

Like that G barre chord above would just be this in power chord form:

5
5
3




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on November 19, 2006, 06:51:40 PM
Again, thanks for the help Stray.

Songs I've been working on, from most interested to least:

Kiss Me by Sixpence None the Richer
Classical Gas - Eric Clapton version and only because I seem to have good luck with it.
Canon in D - Pachelbel and because it's the individual string picking style
Give Me One Reason - Tracey Chapman and because it's good and bluesish.
House of the Rising Sun - Animals and again bluesey.
Horse With No Name - Neil Diamond and because I can play it with two chords only.

As far as classic rock goes, it's typically stuff like Clapton, Cream, The Who, The JHE - that type of music.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2006, 07:07:58 PM
Some Clapton and Who is easy, some really complex.

White Room and Sunshine are easy. My Generation and I Can't Explain are easy. -- Do a Google tab search for those.

Layla isn't easy. Love Ain't for Keeping isn't easy.

House of the Rising Sun -- Definitely a 'rite of passage' type of song:

Am, C, D, F, Am, C, E, E

Am, C, D, F, Am, E, Am, E


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on November 19, 2006, 07:37:46 PM
Hey Stray, have you got AIM or something? It would make these conversations easier.

Either way, my biggest problem is fighting my rampant ADD. If I sit and concentrate on one thing for a while I will certainly improve. However, I flop between too many songs and never get anywhere. Actually, that's my downfall in MMO's too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2006, 07:44:03 PM
Don't have an IM atm.

As for the ADD:

You need to learn a song you really, really like  8-). That way you'll enthrall yourself to learning it, and stay enthusiastic each time it sounds more and more like the real thing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 20, 2006, 07:35:05 AM
I'm the king of song ADD, you'll never beat me because I have such a long headstart.

I jammed with a couple folks on some acoustics last week. They were folkies, and looked at me to pick a song. I just kinda shrugged and had to admit I really don't know any front to back. I can cobble a few together (I did Old Man by Young and Wish You Were Here by Floyd...because they were folkies). But I sit in like a mofo, they did Scarborough Fair and I tried to pick out the melody with some success but played some great minor leads and fills. Basically, if I can play a minor lead, I'm jamming, if not, I'm struggling :)

I also found I really need to work on my rhythms, I tend to wander into leads. The folkies laid down a decent 12 bar for me to play over, and then I basically forced the guy to do a solo (they were both very tentative players, which was too bad because they're both solid). I had a real hard time staying focused on rhythm playing.

My Fostex MR8HD comes in today. I'm hoping that will help me focus on song structure again, it's the skill that seems to be eluding me the most, as I don't really jam with others much.

Climbjtree: check out the entire thread, there's a few fingerpicking suggestions. I have one book that I keep ignoring, beginning blues fingerpicking or something. Alternate bass thumb independent of melody fingers makes hulk smash.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 20, 2006, 07:39:58 AM
Suck on it, Muddy Waters! (http://www.desktopblues.lichtlabor.ch/)
That sounds a lot like where I am on acoustic blues right now. I have a pretty aggressive style, especially when I fingerpick it, I have a tendency to pop the strings. Holdover from playing the bass for so many years, I had a super loud aggressive style on the bass. I dislike namby-pamby guys who barely brush the strings :) You gots to rough her up to get her to scream, babies.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Damn Dirty Ape on November 20, 2006, 03:43:03 PM
Holy shit!

Someone on youtube has posted video of Rush performing "2112", "Anthem", and "Bastille Day" live from 1976.  I've collected bootleg audio/video for Rush for many years now and this is the first time I've even heard of, much less seen, live footage from this era.

2112 (part 1):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm08ZO9fZqw&mode=related&search= (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm08ZO9fZqw&mode=related&search=)

2112 (part 2):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_QJMYIRvRA&mode=related&search= (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_QJMYIRvRA&mode=related&search=)

Anthem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15GXZ8lvLBg&mode=related&search= (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15GXZ8lvLBg&mode=related&search=)

Bastille Day:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCt4orYLBJA&mode=related&search= (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCt4orYLBJA&mode=related&search=)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 20, 2006, 05:28:48 PM
Climbjtree, you don't need to do that G barre if you don't want to. You can play the open G and get by, at least until you feel comfy with barre chords.

In fact, newbies often learn a "cheap G" where they play xx0003. (finger the open G chord shape but don't try for the bass strings).

For blues suitable for beginners, I suggest Pride and Joy by SRV. Ignore the fills, just try to master the basic chords first, then layer in the bass line.

If you want advice on fingerpicking, I can probably help out where Sky can't. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 21, 2006, 08:27:39 AM
Arg, I wouldn't recommend Pride & Joy. For me, at least, the strum is very tough. The walking bass I can pull off, but the high strings backstrum is so damned awkward. Maybe something like Mannish Boy, bada bada bump! All E without chord changes. And also Hootchie Cootchie Man, a solid 12 bar (though Muddy was very loose with the format, more like a 10-15 bar, heh).

Blues basics are easy. 12 bar I-IV-V, most blues follow this format, often with 7th chords for the IV and V. Once you get the basic chording down, work on a shuffle which is the 02xxxx-04xxxx repetition (IV = x02xxx-x04xxx, V = x24xxx-x26xxx, etc). Then get into turnarounds to glue it together. Solo with a minor pentatonic (1, m3, 4, 5, d7, 8; in E: e, g, a, b, d, e). That's basically the blues, with about a gajillion things you can do within the framework. The best thing to do is listen to some Muddy Waters and play along, imo. And remember: you can never play the blues too slow (Muddy's phrase, not mine :)).

My open G always defaults to 320033, it's hard for me to do a standard open G. Sucks because it makes open G7s tougher for me. Ah well, I'm a horrid mishmash of styles and learning :)

First comments on the Fostex MR8HD unit: It's pretty slick. Metal unit, sliders are a bit cheesy, but it's a relatively low-end unit. It lists for $400, I paid $350 at musician's friend. 40GB hard drive in it. Display is very tiny, the unit is a bit loud due to the hd spin. Forgot to buy a punch-in switch and headphones :P Going to spend a few days learning the interface and then try to get something up for you guys to hear. Can't wait to start recording some of my truly stupid ideas, like my blues version of Jay Z's '99 Problems'.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 24, 2006, 12:35:52 PM
Arpeggios from Hell (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiYwOfaPf5I&mode=related&search=)

Interesting to see all the modes Yngwie goes through.  My only complaint is that it would have been more interesting to hear clean. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 24, 2006, 02:06:47 PM
He has great technique but I get bored pretty fast with that stuff. Especially the rhythm section, no groove at all. It's the 'hey look at me' show, blah. I wasn't a big fan of shred even back in the day when I could do some shred. Now shred is 'in' again. I'd rather listen to someone creative like the cat playing with Mars Volta, or more traditional stuff like Warren Haynes or Derek Trucks.

Shred? Bah. Maybe I'll be happier about it if the new shred trend gets rid of cookie monster vocals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 24, 2006, 02:51:03 PM
He has great technique but I get bored pretty fast with that stuff.

I agree completely.  I was more interested in the modes and neck usage.  The guy obviously has a firm grasp of theory... he must have gotten that in exchange for his soul.  That's what his music has always lacked, soul.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on November 25, 2006, 05:30:04 AM
I guess the shredders can do all that hold out a note for 5 mins whilst making fuckfaces so the audience can hold lighters in the air malarkey, it's just that their market dont want anything less than 10 note a second neo classical stuff. Yngwie's been churning out variations of Far beyond the Sun for decades heh. I don't mind heavily arpeggiated music anyway, I was brought up on electronica and classical.

There's a time and place for guitar music with soul too, I saw my first Slayer concert on Monday. I don't think they are going for that type of emotional response. There's feeling to it, but as it's the musical equivilent of an artillery barrage it's a bit more physical and tangible than a bluesman's licks.

Here's a bit of guitar wankery thats a little bit more musical than chaining endless sweep argeggio's (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-741601852741074772&q=bob+zabek)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 25, 2006, 10:21:41 AM
I saw my first Slayer concert on Monday. I don't think they are going for that type of emotional response. There's feeling to it, but as it's the musical equivilent of an artillery barrage it's a bit more physical and tangible than a bluesman's licks.

Here's a bit of guitar wankery thats a little bit more musical than chaining endless sweep argeggio's (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-741601852741074772&q=bob+zabek)


I always thought of Slayer, or just about any thrash/death metal guitar players, as percussionists. With a few exceptions.

I feel that's the kind of state of mind I have to be in when jamming with metal buddies as well. I just don't really feel like a "guitar player"....The way I see it.

Not to say I don't like it though. Slayer riffs are the shit. Raining Blood, Behind the Crooked Cross --   :rock:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 26, 2006, 08:53:59 PM
This thread lacks acoustic stuff in it.  :-D

Months ago, I broke the 4th string on my 112-year-old banjo that I think I have mentioned here before. Since it predates steel strings, that means I had to go looking for gut or nylon. I ended up getting several sets of LaBella nylons that seemed like they were decent. Then I picked up one set of Aquila "Nylgut" strings, which are supposed to have the same characteristics as gut. They cost like it too... one set was $8, whereas $8 got me three sets of the LaBellas. The Aquila ones are what the guy who fixed up the banjo put on there in the first place. I replaced the broken 4th with a LaBella for now. I figure, I'll try replacing them all with the complete Aquila set when they wear out.

This means I started playing banjo again for the first time in ages.

I was getting these strings at Elderly Instruments because of course nobody close by stocks weird-ass banjo strings. (I went to three stores and only two of them even had the steel strings). Elderly has free shipping if you get your order large enough. So I figured I should shop. I picked up some polish and fretboard cleaner and the like.

Then I grabbed a Kyser partial capo, because my usual trick of turning the capo upside-down doesn't work so well on the Melody Maker (which I love to play, btw, you may get me to try doing more electric stuff just because of this guitar). This is great for doing the partial capo 3-4-5 thing, which I do a lot, but I also do other things (for example, partial 2-3-4-5-6 at the 5th fret, or 1-2-3-4 at a variety of frets, particularly when in DADGAD tuning) and this won't help with those. But for what it does, it's really nice, much nicer than the upside-down solution.

This led me to also find this thing called a Third Hand Capo -- basically, you can capo each string independently. It's basically an elastic capo, but with rotatable plastic ovals for each string. You just roll them out of the way. Unfortunately, well, it's an elastic capo. It does let me do all of my weird capoings (hey, at least I have mostly stopped doing double capoing -- one regular and then a partial above it!) so I may mess with it for that purpose.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 26, 2006, 11:10:20 PM
I usually order strings online. Hate going to a store for that.

http://www.juststrings.com/ (http://www.juststrings.com/)

They have those La Bellas you were talking about, I think. It's a good and fast site to buy bulk from.

Who made that banjo anyways? Or can you tell?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 27, 2006, 08:57:49 AM
I enjoy buying strings. Supports the local music shop, I always buy a few picks though with the heavy gauge I use my picks last for years. I try to buy what I can from them, but they don't stock much good stuff. I got my Alvarez jumbo there. They mostly focus on lessons and school band stuff. Also, good opportunity to shoot the shit with some locals, I helped some guys with a recording solution for their band.

I inherited my grandfather's banjo, a crappy Silvertone. Real crappy, action is ridiculous. I thought about trying to lower the bridge, but I don't want to destroy the thing. I just bought some new strings for it. Need to actually learn how to play it, I tune it like a 5 string guitar :) Right now it's strung with the high and low string and I've been doing an Indian chant with it. Don't ask. In other stringed instrument news, I've been thinking about picking up a Charango (http://www.bolivianstuff.com/index.php?cPath=43_87&osCsid=855b990f84b518560ec1fc03681d7934). I know a guy from Chile who is just amazing, a master of the instrument. I know him from the renfaire circuit and might be able to talk him into lessons during the summer while his band is here.

Slayer. One of my favorite bands from the early 80s, I remember buying a Metal Massacre compilation with them on it, it turned out to be their vinyl debut. We used to get a lot of compilations because it was a great way back in the pre-internet days of digging new music (and a huge thanks to metal blade records!). There was some metallica, helloween, lots of cool stuff. Then I got their debut, Show No Mercy. Bought every subsequent album up until Seasons of the Abyss. Reign in Blood, of course, is the classic, but there were some great tracks on every album. I even arranged South of Heaven with a midi orchestra when I was in music school. The teacher didn't know the source, but my clique of metal buddies were sniggering in the back of the room. It really lent itself to the full orchestral treatment, suprisingly. For so many instruments, I had to layer in a lot more harmonies and side melodies than the band put in, but it turned out great. Wish I still had a tape of that.

Speaking of tape (I now date myself by calling all recording tape, like the DVR "Did I tape that episode"...bah), I laid down my very first full vocal/guitar song :) I never used to sing (except a few regretable backups) back in my band days. And I did lay down a snippet of "Sweet Dreams" when testing a recording setup (that sucked) in the late 90s. But this is my very first actual recording with my instrumentation + vocals. I did "I Can't Be Satisfied", a Muddy Waters slide in open G. Turned out ok, and I need to clean it up because I was kinda nervous and not really in the zone. Messed up the guitar several times, and my vocals...well, they're on there, anyway. A friend was over for football on Sunday and I played it for him. He loves slide guitar, so he liked it. I asked him about the vocals and he said it sounds like Tom Waits. Not sure if that's a compliment.

I'll probably retrack both the guitar and vocals, but first I want to test out the whole bouncing to the pc thing. The Fostex MR8HD is a nice little unit. A bit limited, but hey, it was only $350. Actually...my first track was "Old Man" by Neil Young...but oof...the vocals on that had me laughing my ass off. I'll stick with Muddy for a while ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 27, 2006, 11:49:54 AM
Supports the local music shop

Hmm...What's that?  :-D

Seems like everything has been taken over by the Sam Ash and Guitar Centers of the world. Even the local shops that do exist function in much the same way as Guitar Center. There's a popular local shop here in my town called "Hermes Music", but it's just as big and impersonal as Wal Mart.

There's one cool shop that's fairly small, but they specialize in boutique-ish triple rec amps, and not much else.

The used shops spread about have shit for vintage equipment.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 27, 2006, 01:14:06 PM
When I'm feeling nostalgic, I like to check out Ed Roman (http://www.iwantguitars.com/store/?search=1&select2=&order=sku&s_dept=&s_brand=&s_name=&s_model=&s_desc=&s_vint=on&s_rstr=&page=0) and eBay for vintage stuff. Some of the prices make my jaw drop, but it's still fun to look.  I miss all of the local shops, but can understand why it's so hard to stay in business as one.  Finding cheap gear is as easy as firing up your computer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 27, 2006, 01:17:51 PM
I like to check out Ed Roman for his rants. He's incredibly asshole-ish.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 27, 2006, 01:23:43 PM
I like to check out Ed Roman for his rants. He's incredibly asshole-ish.

I agree.  I think it's his best quality.  Reading the tips on his site reminds me of a sign hanging in a small guitar shop in Minneapolis (B-Sharp was the store if you've ever been there):  "In God we trust.  All others pay with cash."


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 27, 2006, 03:56:42 PM
I usually order strings online. Hate going to a store for that.

http://www.juststrings.com/ (http://www.juststrings.com/)

Well, I was hoping to have them that day. No such luck.

Quote
They have those La Bellas you were talking about, I think. It's a good and fast site to buy bulk from.

Who made that banjo anyways? Or can you tell?

S S Stewart. I blogged in detail, including pictures, here:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2006/07/07/1894-stewart-banjo/

(http://www.raphkoster.com/wp-content/_Banjo.JPG)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sir Fodder on November 30, 2006, 03:31:18 PM

I got a steel string acoustic when I was 16 and tried to learn how to play for about 15 years on and off, I was pathetically bad however. I could be considered one of the worlds' worst guitar players but I probably don't even qualify for that. Anyways, I've got a masochistic streak and want to give it another go. I remember the first time sitting down with my guitar and not being able to figure out which way to hold it (righty or lefty). I'm sort of ambidextrous, probably more accurate to say I'm neither handed though. I think I wanted to play it lefty but it was strung right-handed so I just stuck with that.

I recently got a cheap nylon string guitar and am thinking maybe I'd have more success playing it lefty, but is it ok to just flip it over to play lefty? I restrung it a few days ago and it seems to work OK but I'm worried the string tensions might warp the neck or something... also should I flip the plastic bridge thingies around (the one at top seems glued in place)?

Another question I have is that I hate having long fingernails, I always cut them all down to the quick so I'm using my fingertips to pluck the strings. Seems like every finger-player (term?) uses their fingernails. I'm also using my pinky to pluck, I haven't noticed guitarists using their pinky much, but I'm thinking why let that bugger go to waste? Will this style work out ok in the long run? thanks


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 30, 2006, 04:39:38 PM
I recently got a cheap nylon string guitar and am thinking maybe I'd have more success playing it lefty, but is it ok to just flip it over to play lefty? I restrung it a few days ago and it seems to work OK but I'm worried the string tensions might warp the neck or something... also should I flip the plastic bridge thingies around (the one at top seems glued in place)?

Don't worry about neck tensions. It's quite fine. If the guitar has been strung like that for a LONG time though (i.e. is it new or old?), then it might mess with the tension a tiny bit. If that's the case, all you'd have to do is readjust the truss rod a small amount (like a 45 degree turn).

Flipping the bridge around is up to you, but not absolutely necessary. It might mess up your intonation a bit though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 30, 2006, 11:35:10 PM
You can play quite successfully with flesh as opposed to nails. So don't worry about it. With nylon, it will not make a huge difference except in tone. If you were playing on steel, playing on nails helps reduce blistering on the fingertips of the picking hand.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 01, 2006, 06:49:07 AM
I use my fleshy bits to fingerpick (term: fingerpicker). I'd like to cultivate nails, the guy I mentioned who plays charango has some crazy hard pointy nails, I just can't do it. Also, my style is very influenced by my years playing bass with my fingers (striving to be Cliff Burton or Steve Harris...I can be percussive...). I have a shortcut to callous my right hand, I practice bass for a few hours a day before doing some intense fingerpicking guitar.

Righty/lefty, just go with your writing stance. If you write left-handed, play lefthanded. It really doesn't matter. In fact, that's kinda been my credo: it doesn't matter, go with what's right for you. If it feels natural (and sounds good) playing with your pinky, go for it. I use my pinky occasionally because it just kinda does it (I'm not real disciplined :)). I got a lot of compliments on my bass style when I was in music school because of my (disciplined!) two finger style (it took a lot of work to make them alternate properly), but mostly for my incorporation of the ring finger into more complex rhythm patterns (especially triplets, it's the only way I could play Maiden tunes, hours spent playing The Trooper ftw). So yeah, if it works, work it. If it feels odder than playing without it, maybe you could learn pieces with and without the pinky so you'll be able to play both ways or drop one down the line.

If you do decide to go lefty, you have to make the string flip decision early. Some lefties played with restrung right-hand guitars (Hendrix), some with lefty guitars, some with right-hand guitars strung for right-handers (Albert King, it's one of the reasons for his mighty bends, I've read).

I'm dying to post my crappy little song I recorded, but I'm striving mightily to wait until I have a better version recorded. I've already laid down a new (a bit too drunken) voice part that is much more in the direction I'm trying for. I have a very non-melodic voice (I find it very unpleasant :P) so I'm going for more of a Howlin' Wolf growl, which isn't so apparent in the first take. Also, need to fix a couple guitar bits. My girlfriend says I have 'show & tell' syndrome, as soon as I do something or get something new, I love to share it with everyone.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sir Fodder on December 02, 2006, 06:17:58 PM
Thanks for the info and tips. Its a new guitar ($99 Yamaha, seems pretty nice considering). Its a very pleasant feeling to play with the fingertips, physically satisfying (I tried with steel strings + pick in the past), though the tone is maybe not as clear as with a pick/nails. I write lefty but do other stuff righty/ambi - I always wondered about guitar handedness, thought the fret hand is the trickier part so its seems a bit counterintuitive how it works out for most people.

Go for it Sky I'd like to hear it, seems like a friendly place here, no worries.

Raph, that ukulele is freaking kool, nice tune (May) and the tone is sweet. Its astounding to me you are an accomplished musician on top of all the other stuff, makes me wonder what your parents/childhood were like. That your granddad had the uke is really neat, such a personal thing, all that sweat and care going into playing it... I wish I had been able to snag my granddads piano.

Thats interesting about Hendrix, his later live recordings have always tore me up real bad, 'Machine Gun' especially just lays me low. I was reading the BBC website last week with my mom nearby, there was a blurb for Jimi's birthday and I mentioned to her that he would have been 64 that day. She said "I didn't know you like Jimi Hendrix" then told me about how she and my dad had taken me to a Hendrix concert when I was about 4 months old, I was like "WHAT?!?"; my mom is the last person in the world I would have expected to be at a Hendrix concert, she is straight out of the old world (from Latvia on a donkey fleeing the Russians during WWII) and very elegant/conservative. She said "I couldn't believe that so much...(pause, clenches fists and grimaces) power could be going through one person." Damn, damn, damn... that hit me in the chest like a hammer.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 02, 2006, 11:35:35 PM
Raph, that ukulele is freaking kool, nice tune (May) and the tone is sweet. Its astounding to me you are an accomplished musician on top of all the other stuff, makes me wonder what your parents/childhood were like. That your granddad had the uke is really neat, such a personal thing, all that sweat and care going into playing it... I wish I had been able to snag my granddads piano.

The music stuff seems to have skipped a generation, actually. Both of my grandfathers were musicians. Of my paternal grandfather, my dad said "if it had strings, he could play it." But none of my uncles and aunts play. I do have a few cousins who do, though -- one's a drummer, and I think there's another guitar player. Many of my memories of my paternal grandparents involve song circles around a camper in Key Largo, lots of older folks playing all these jazz tunes.

My other grandfather played the Puerto Rican cuatro. He loved to sit on the porch and noodle on it. I never really listened to him much on it -- now I wish I had. I should chase down a cuatro at some point. Who knows where his ended up.

But me, I didn't pick up the guitar until I was 18. I messed around with keyboards before that. It was one of those things that I just said, "you know, I think I would like to learn how," and I had an old guitar that my brother had taken lessons on and ended up not pursuing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 03, 2006, 12:11:19 AM
No musicians in my family (that I know of). Several kinds of artists though. My grandmother illustrated a lot of old Hollywood magazines. Mom's involved in arts and crafts stuff. Brother's a painter. I'm a fairly competent doodler. ;)

Picked up guitar at 13. Probably would have done it sooner if I had known it was "possible" (I had been under the impression that it was one of those things only famous people did or something. Hehe). The second I saw one of my old neighbors bust out his electric, I had to get one. He's the guy that originally taught me a lot of surf stuff, and to this day, those sensibilities have stuck with me.

SirFodder, I'm a lefty playing righty too (if I read you correctly). I, too, think it's a natural fit. Most notable guitarist in our boat that I can think of is Nels Cline. Pretty kickass experimental/jazz player, but probably more known for being in Wilco.

Here he is in Banyan (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmddP2cJkJ8).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 04, 2006, 06:52:58 AM
No great musicians in my family, and I'm the only one still practicing. I grew up under the piano, though. Had an uncle and grandmother who played a lot, she did all spitiruals (southern baptist) and he was real eclectic (ragtime, 70s rock, classical, tv themes, he had a great ear). My mother used to play, too, but she hasn't in years. I think everyone should play a musical instrument, it's part of being a human :)

Part of why I'm reluctant to upload stuff is that I set the bar very high for myself. Fodder is new and maybe hasn't read the whole thread, but I used to be a pro metal bass player back in the 80s/90s (no you never heard of us or I'd still be pro hehe). Now I play blues guitar. My bar for quality is set where I left it when playing metal, very high. I was at the top of my game, pushed to what I could do with my genetics, when I was playing metal, vs being a blues newb. I'm used to having a singer as good as Bruce Dickinson or Geoff Tate, and my voice is barely musical. I've forgotten just about everything about recording I learned in school. So I'm wicked shy about my music right now, even if I'm not exactly a shy person about anything else...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 04, 2006, 09:24:47 AM
[link removed]

Sorry, the hosting was only temoporary. I lost my isp password :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2006, 11:23:22 AM
Link doesn't work. You did that on purpose, didn't you?  :-P


I don't upload anything because I sold my mics. Serious!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 04, 2006, 11:38:43 AM
Oops.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2006, 12:18:41 PM
Pretty cool man. I thought you said you had problems with slide? Sounds good to me. That was G right? Do you have anything in E too? I've been dabbling with that tuning lately myself.

One nitpick though: Need to turn down the lows a bit, and get that bad boy in the midrange (or alternatively, play on your bridge pickup). Also, bring those vocals to the forefront (not bad btw!).

[edit] Or in other words, I'd really like to record you Sky ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 04, 2006, 12:33:17 PM
I botched a spot where the lyrics break for a bass solo (that's not on there), and ended on the wrong note :) It's in open G. I don't have any EQ set up (I don't have an EQ), I probably could have imported it into Cakewalk, but I don't know how to use Cakewalk. I've got an old copy a friend gave me without a manual and the only manual I could find to download is the wrong version...And forget adjusting the guitar, that's my crapola guitar an ex-girlfriend left me because she felt too bad about me not having a guitar to take it. Cort strat knock-off, total garbage. I set the strings wicked high so it works decent for slide stuff and I can leave it in open tunings rather than always retuning. I also prefer a low boost like that, chalk it up to years of cutting out the midrange playing bass. But even when I was in school, no 'trained' people ever like my mixes, I guess I have an odd ear.

I did mess around with open E a couple weeks ago when I was toying with Statesboro Blues (Allmans version), but I decided to stick with works-in-progress before starting anything new. Muddy Waters played in open G for all of his early career, which is what I'm working on right now.

Finally, my bass thumb on guitar just sucks imo :) It's hard for me to break it into two seperate lines.

Vocals intentionally put way in the back :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sir Fodder on December 04, 2006, 10:37:44 PM
That put a big  8-) on my face Sky, bravo! (btw I've been around forever, just don't post much).

I was one of 6 kids, and the only one to never receive musical instruction. All the rest got extensive training, I was the only kid seriously interested in music too, WTF mom and dad? They said I was too "difficult" to even try,  jeesh; I went downtown (a BIG no no!) with a pocket full of change when I was in second grade and bought Sgt. Peppers. The thin tie clerks gave me a ton of good natured crap, especially when they found I was short some change, they still let me have the album. Of course nowadays I'm the only one among my siblings still pursuing music.

One note regarding my folks bringing me to see Hendrix when I was an infant; I've always "bragged" tongue in cheek that my first concert was a Neil Sedaka and Carpenters show I saw at age 7 or so, haha! Apparently I also got to see Glen Campbell perform "in a small restaurant with about 5 other people present" a few days after the Hendrix show. Damn. Neil and Carpenters were only my 3rd show  :cry:   :-D



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2006, 09:26:00 AM
Hardly worth a bravo, but thanks.

My lady gets out of work a half hour later than I, so last night I broke out the guitar when I got home, intending to lay down a twelve bar to play over. I'm very bad at discipline, as I've mentioned, I can't even keep a twelve bar rhythm going without noodling around...Anyway, while I was tuning up the acoustic, I revisited an old jam I'd shared here before, so I decided to lay it down for grins. And just like the original, once I'd laid down the rhythm I had to put a lead on it...then I decided to add another rhythm track...and then I decided to put on a mysterious background sound..

It's a fingerpicked acoustic rhythm on 1, I think I flatpicked the acoustic solo on 2, a flatpicked acoustic rhythm (for percussiveness) on 3, and some spacey guitar sound on my SG on 4. Pushed the two rhythm tracks left and right, pushed the SG way back for just a kind of ethereal odd sound in the back. Very sloppy as always, just first take improv stuff I quickly laid down (about 15 minutes total) while waiting to go to the store. Once I spend the time to do good takes I might actually be happy with my stuff :)

I've got a lot of work ahead to get back my recording skills. One reason my mixes are not up to snuff is my monitor situation. I used to have good studio monitors and headphones, as well as a variety of stuff to play the mixes on (home stereo with nice speakers, etc). Now I've got cheap old pc powered monitors (shorted out, they suck), a cheap headphone I used to use for teamspeak, and my 5.1 (which lacks good stereo fronts because I'm cheap).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 05, 2006, 09:51:18 AM
Nice solo/lead playing, but yeah, you're right, you lack discipline for rhythm. I thought you had played bass! Next time, only lay one rhythm track. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2006, 10:00:33 AM
I was trying to layer and intertwine them, because the fingerpicked and percussive things played well off each other...I just couldn't hear the first one well when I was laying down the second one and kept forgetting where the changes were because I was doing it off the cuff :) When I played bass, I had an amazing drummer to keep time and whatnot.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on December 05, 2006, 11:12:07 AM
Oh i liked that spanish like one. Mix was a bit messy, but solo and fingerpicking was real nice.

Its nearly a year since i started playing, and seem to be keen as ever. Hope i keep it up as long as you guys, perhaps one day i will be able to lay down the Dragonforce solo of my dreams lol.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on December 09, 2006, 12:01:53 PM
I missed the performance - maybe you could find another host? I'd like to hear it!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sir Fodder on December 19, 2006, 12:41:13 AM
I'm still trying to figure out the best way to hold my classical type guitar, the left side of my back ends up getting fatigued real quick (playing left handed). I put a strap on it and it helps a lot though its still not great. I don't like the idea of using a foot stool / raising one leg up to rest the guitar on. I watched some videos of classical guitarists not using a foot stool but I can't figure out how they do it, like this guy (who IMO is amazing): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W7CCQi-CWI     I tried holding the guitar like him but the neck wants to just fall down to horizontal, how the heck is he holding it like that?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 19, 2006, 01:44:17 AM
Takes practice.

Like I said to someone earlier in this thread, a big part about learning an instrument is dexterous. Getting acquainted and used to the physicality of it. Be it piano, horns, percussion, or string instruments.

----

Sorry to derail, but I came across a cool video of one of my favorite guitarists (and singer/songwriters to boot):

Richard Thompson - 1952 Vincent Black Lightning (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxKTzwaEa2o)

Pretty cool. I wish all my favorite musicians filmed themselves strumming in their living rooms.

Any Fairport/Thompson fans here?



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 19, 2006, 07:27:38 AM
That guy was pretty good. As far as classical guitarists, I've been listening to Christopher Parkening (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ7iX_dWec4) doing some Segovia and flamenco. Sans Placido, though ;) Also some Pepe Romero (http://youtube.com/watch?v=X0m2iSLaWQo), who is pretty amazing. The guy who first got me into flamenco style (though he's really more jazz now that I'm eruditer ;)) was Paco DeLucia (http://youtube.com/watch?v=OV_OysllKJQ) on the amazing Friday Night in San Francisco, with John McLaughlin (http://youtube.com/watch?v=W-MkGO0th9Y) and Al DiMeola (http://youtube.com/watch?v=RHnth4Av-Nk). If you don't own that album, YOU MUST GO BUY IT NOW. It's the best guitar album I've ever heard, I've had a copy since 84 or so.

The guy Fodder is looking at seems to be balancing the butt of the guitar in his lap. I imagine that would take some practice. I sit the hip of the guitar on my right leg (I'm right-handed), though I was taught to sit it on my left leg with a foot step. I might play around with new stances because lately I've really been digging into the top side with my upper right arm. I don't know if that's because I'm just playing so much more acoustic now (blues and some clsasical I'm working on for the holidays) or if it's because it's a jumbo guitar or what.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sir Fodder on December 19, 2006, 01:45:06 PM
Damn, you people have some good taste, I usually have a hard time finding music I like. Thompson is amazing, I just heard his stuff for the first time a few weeks ago on a Sierra Nevada show that popped up on a public access channel. I was admiring his stage presence/writing/singing for a while, then suddenly it hit me what an amazing guitarist he is.  DeLucia yes! DiMeola not so much, he always seemed to me a bit spastic and infatuated with technique, same for McLaughlin but I do like some of his early 70's stuff. Haven't heard any of their more recent (post mid 70s) stuff though, I'll keep an eye out for the live album.


Back to guitar holding: in that Parkening video he seems comfortable with the foot stool but his torso appears sort of twisted, I want to avoid that (my spine is really long and back not too strong) and the between the legs style seems more ergonomic (I'm not sure though) and sexy to boot. If I try to hold the guitar this way though it seems to be more than just a matter of dexterity, it would require superhuman picking-arm-strength or a super sticky guitar without propping it with the fretting hand, which seems awkward...

Hmm! I was looking for more examples of guitar holding and came across this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbeAbllBpGo  and this  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZkK5Bbn0Og  There appears to be some kind of stand attached to the side-underside ofthe guitar. I thought there was something fishy going on. Anyone know anything about this prop thingy?

Damn though, I took another look at that Peo Kindgren video I posted and there appears to be no prop, the guitar seems to just magically stick there, it can't be balanced at that angle! and it's clear that his fret hand isn't propping it up, what the heck is going on? Hmm, is it just a shadow here? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC0tuRFHbUg maybe he's got a mini-prop?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on December 19, 2006, 03:17:16 PM
If you want a guitar that naturally holds itself in an upright position you could always try a Flying V Accoustic (http://www.deanguitars.com/dean_winter_06/v_coustic.htm). Gimmicky though!

Paul Gilbert playing spanish guitar. (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4136369911221730998&q=paul+gilbert+flamingo) I won't comment on the standard of his playing compared to the masters listed above, but it's a really nice tune.
I don't really have a clue whats going on here. Some kind of Japanese TV show (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peQiudKTyiE&mode=related&search=) involving him and Marty Friedman. I like the way that even though they both speak Japanese, they get subtitled. Bizarre and strangely watchable though, and plenty of good ol' guitar wankery.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 19, 2006, 04:52:01 PM
Yeah, that's a great show. I wish someone did something like that in America.

...Then again, maybe not. Without the Japanese goofiness, it'd probably suck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 19, 2006, 05:31:48 PM
Damn, you people have some good taste, I usually have a hard time finding music I like. Thompson is amazing, I just heard his stuff for the first time a few weeks ago on a Sierra Nevada show that popped up on a public access channel. I was admiring his stage presence/writing/singing for a while, then suddenly it hit me what an amazing guitarist he is.

Yeah, I really dig him. Definitely in my top 10. Too bad there aren't very many good examples of his electric playing on Youtube...Especially before he left Fairport. He's an amazing lead guitar player, but on acoustic, it's the singing and songwriting that stand out (I'm not complaining though).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sir Fodder on December 19, 2006, 10:56:04 PM
Oh wow, I didn't realize Richard Thompson was in Fairport. Back in '84 I saw an open air Jethro Tull concert on a pier in NYC (right next to that aircraft carrier they just moved); the opening act was supposed to be "Fairport Five" but there was a transport problem and only 2 of the members made it on time, I'm now almost certain one of them must have been Thompson - there was some prodigious acoustic jamming going on. The Tull band joined them on stage and they had a raucous medievalish acoustic set that was freaking amazing, one of those things where everything just came together perfect.

OK, I think I've got to the bottom of this mysteriously balanced guitar mystery! Take a look at the ErgoPlay and Efel Rest on this page: http://www.staffordguitar.com/shop/accessoriesnew.asp  I must have one of these things, anyone have recommendations for online guitar gear sellers?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 20, 2006, 02:20:29 AM
That might have been him in 84, but not likely. He was one of the founders of Fairport, but he left in the early 70's. He occasionally gigs with them though.

The Thompson era Fairport (which was more Folk Rock-ish, with Thompson's guitar antics) is a completely different beast than what it became (more Folk and Experimental).

This is the only decent example of him in Fairport on Youtube:

Time Will Show the Wiser (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMIq_pmHLAI)

Really cool groove, some great lead fill ins (although brief). Still not a good example though.

[EDIT] Crap, I screwed up in editing this thing and lost another link I put up....Oh well.

Anyhow, he's not doing Paganini like some of these links you guys are posting. ;) I don't like him because of virtuosity or anything. He just has these quivering vibrato techniques that I love...Really expressive, even with one note.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 20, 2006, 07:08:02 AM
I'm not really into the folk thing. I occasionally jam with two folkies and it's tough to integrate into their playing. I usually just sit back and noodle. It's funny with them and the capoes, though (hi Raph!). I just find capoes throw me off, so I just play in whatever key without the capo.

I have been getting a little into the Renaissance thing, I've been very inspired by a chilean guy Conrado Garcia. I think I've mentioned him before, he's a charangista (plays the charango), and he's got amazing technique. The main reason I go to our local renfest is to watch him. You can check out some videos and mp3s here (http://www.cantigamusic.com/music.html), though he's not on all of them. I also picked up this book (http://www.amazon.com/Cantigas-Renaissance-Festival-Favorites-Bielefeld/dp/078664432X/sr=8-2/qid=1166627042/ref=sr_1_2/102-5870137-5632113?ie=UTF8&s=books) they just put out. Nice collection of instrumentals and renfest singalongs.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 20, 2006, 07:16:55 AM
My neighbor (and the guy I play with the most these days) is pretty renfaire-ish and folky. He even looks like James Taylor. Hehe. Very cool guy though. He's been playing for 30 years longer than I have, and has taught me a lot.

But anyways, Fairport is definitely folk-y. You'd have to be into it somewhat. The early Fairport was better at incorporating it with rock though.

Umm....

Here's a good example I just uploaded:

Matty Groves (http://files.filefront.com//;6390859;;/)

Probably the coolest version of Matty Groves ever. Almost gets a little Prog-ish towards the end there. But the standout in that song is not Thompson, it's Sandy Denny on vocals.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 28, 2006, 07:00:49 AM
I don't think I've mentioned these fun books I found: Blues Play-along (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0634056271). There's a couple blues (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0793574625), some funk, some soul, some rock, etc, etc. I got the two blues and a southern rock (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0634084003) for xmas. They have two versions of each track: one with the vocal stripped and one with vocals and guitar stripped. Fun to play along with and kind of interesting to hear some very guitar-heavy tunes sans guitar, bringing out the piano and horn parts (which I love). Wish I had known about these years ago. Thanks, Hal Leonard!

Santa also brought me a couple of things for the SIAB (studio-in-a-box, my MR8HD): a decent pair of Sennheiser headphones (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Sennheiser-HD280-Pro-ClosedBack-Headphones?sku=242411) for monitoring and the all-important footswitch (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Korg-PS100-Momentary-Footswitch?sku=152189) for punching in. I'm also starting to learn how to use the dern thing. I'll spare you guys my test recordings for a while :) I did a decent Kind-Hearted Woman and an atrocious Sweet Home Chicago (Robert Johnson not Blues Brothers). Robert Johnson is so simple yet so complex, it's pretty wild stuff. If you haven't listened to his stuff, I highly recommend it (if you're interested in blues, of course). Also a super-seekr1t version of Melissa by Gregg Allman for my ladyfriend, going to surprise her with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 04, 2007, 07:34:08 AM
Man, grab one of those Fostex MR8HD units I just got. They are great. Not sure what your financial constraints are, but one of those plus a cd burner in your pc is all you really need for a basic cd.

I still have my trusty old PowerMac for recording, but I sold my mics awhile back. And I'm picky about mics. Almost as picky as I am with guitars. The only thing I can record right now is MIDI/synth. I've yet to put this amp I have in a recording, and that's what I want to do (the Fender VK I posted some time back). As for the songs I have on the backburner, they were all recorded with a handheld and either an acoustic or my cheapo Vox. Just scrapbooks really.

I have some older stuff on file that I used to do for my brother's multimedia firm, and an old demo album for a friend's metal band too. I'd post them, but I'm not too proud of that stuff. It's not really me ;).
(Continued from pet projects)

I've been going direct guitar > Boss GT6 > Fostex MR8HD. I don't have a good sounding amp right now, so it's not a huge deal, but at some point I'll need to get something for playing shows, a fender twin or something. Right now it's some cheezy Peavey 150W bass amp into a Dean Markley 1x15 cab loaded with my old favorite bass speaker, the EVMB 400W 15". Also, using the phantom on the MR8HD for my only mic right now, the mighty dynamic Shure SM58 road warrior. I should probably look to upgrade that at some point or learn how to use the mic better (I actually do know how to use one well, though...) because it's been more uneven than it should be for recording.

I could see mics becoming an obsession. I wasn't too obsessed in the band days, because I didn't really have any money, I just worked with what I had. But now I have to be real disciplined...At the very least I want to grab a large diaphram condenser and a few small diaphrams for my drum kit when I get to that point. And a new drum kit at some point, bought mine for $100. The SM58 actually isn't too bad for my vocals as I'm going for a growly thing anyway, but I'd like some flexibility.

And then there's equalization...I'm a fan of analog gear, it's what I learned on. Or at least hardware, I haven't really enjoyed using a computer for recording (though I learned them, too, back in the early 90s). My thought there is one of those nice rack graphic EQs with the shiny lights :) I'm working hard at not getting GAS (gear acquisition syndrome) until I've recorded at least one cd worth of material, though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 04, 2007, 02:25:21 PM
Right now I just want a Senn MD421 and an SM57. Nothing too fancy, but I keep spending cash on other stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 05, 2007, 06:32:05 AM
Me, too. Especially trying to build a high end pc next month. And I think I want to grab an ipod before they screw them up. My bets are on a bigger screen with the next product refresh, and I don't want a big screen. There's a decent SM57 drum set (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Shure-Drum-Mic-Package?sku=270263) I'm considering because it then gives me three 57s to play with (plus 'free' drum mounts). I'm tentative about the kick mic, since it doesn't look like it'll be a multitasker, but it might be ok for my bass. I'll probably hold off on a large diaphram condenser until I can afford something nice, the dynamic really should be good enough with my crappy vocals.

I really wish I had somewhere better to set up my drums. They are in the basement of my mom's house (she LOVES that), and it scares the hell out of her cats when I go over there to play. And I'm limited to times when she's not there, it's a long drive, etc. Bah. Drums r fun.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 09, 2007, 08:20:08 AM
Not strictly a guitar thing, but I'll drop it in here: Belkin Tunestudio (http://playlistmag.com/news/2007/01/08/tunestudio/index.php). Rather limited (16bit) but to be expected given the device involved. Basically, a ministudio to interface with an ipod. Kinda nifty (though I still don't have an ipod!).

(http://edge.macworld.com/2007/01/images/content/tunestudio.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 09, 2007, 04:06:29 PM
That's slick.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 10, 2007, 11:45:57 PM
Sniff, I don't own an iPod, but that thing looks like a good replacement for my aging setup: a Tascam Portastudio II that I use only as a mixer, running into an Audigy EX (yeah, the original Audigy).



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 11, 2007, 07:02:26 AM
I'll pimp the fostex mr8hd again. Great little unit, though I really think I need some EQ. And more mics. And near-field monitors. :| The 40GB HD is nice, my biggest worry was that I couldn't bounce discreet tracks, only the stereo mixdown...in fact, that's what the manual says, too. But when I mounted it on my pc (as an external USB drive), I had access to all the files. I'm not sure about the other way (discreet tracks from the pc to the unit, but mixdowns to the unit are supposed to work, not sure why).

So if I ever get off my lazy ass and get a decent pc program to edit and mix (I'll take suggestions, I have an old undocumented copy of Cakewalk (6 maybe?)), I should be golden until I want to move into the low-end professional space.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 11, 2007, 07:51:23 AM
At the end of the day, just remember that Bruce Springsteen made Nebraska on a tape 4 track.  :-P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 11, 2007, 02:09:21 PM
Well, I do my recording to hard disk on my computer these days. But having something more portable would be cool. This thing looks like it does double-duty.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 07, 2007, 12:49:27 AM
Thread... must... not... slip... off... front... page....!

Recent musicky stuff I have posted:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/02/04/the-sunday-poemsong-longitude/
http://www.raphkoster.com/2006/11/26/the-sunday-song-the-coming-gloria/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 07, 2007, 06:22:40 AM
You are far more focused than I :P I should have some new stuff soonish, though. I think I need to take my acoustic into the shop and get a winter shim made (or figger it out meself), it usually bottoms out on bends on the first couple strings in the 10-13 fret range, where I play alot (bb box area!). This morning it was totally fretting out and unplayable there :( Sonofa. I mostly practice on the acoustic for finger strength, so I might raise the action a little, too.

The Longitude reminds me of some stuff I wrote in the 80s, about archeologists in Egypt. My singer rejected them as 'geek songs' :P I took it as a compliment, but they were never recorded.

The Coming sounds like it could have been an early Claypool tune, I like how you crafted it as a story.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 07, 2007, 04:20:01 PM
I have built a 350 song fakebook of stuff I enjoy playing at jams, and have a copy of it at the office now too. That's where most of my playing has gone lately... those songs are actually years old (Longitude dates from 2001 and that recording from 2002).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on February 08, 2007, 02:08:43 AM
I have a new accoustic, a Yamaha APX 500BL (http://www.musik-service.de/yamaha-apx-500-bl-prx395756080de.aspx). Its was only cheap, but the neck and action are more like an electric than other accoustics i've played, although strings little close together, and cant do bends as easy. Tone could be better of course, but its nice for its price. Just so easy to pick up and play for a little bit without having to plug in my POD etc. It's small too and more suited to me. A dreadnought body is too big i can barely get my right arm over those, and are uncomfortable to play.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 08, 2007, 08:31:25 AM
I have built a 350 song fakebook of stuff I enjoy playing at jams, and have a copy of it at the office now too. That's where most of my playing has gone lately... those songs are actually years old (Longitude dates from 2001 and that recording from 2002).
I've been trying to focus enough to play a few songs in their entirity :) I really, really need to get out and play at some blues jams, we have one a month here. Problem is I tend to odder songs, and nobody really plays the older country blues style I enjoy (my boss called it 'sittin on the porch' music). I've mentioned the play-along books I got and they are great for discipline, as the recorder has been. I'm feeling pretty confident (although I'm sure I'll do better than at least a third of the hackers that get up there), but I'm a perfectionist coming from (ok, 15 years ago!) being at the top of the game as a metal bassist, so my standards are set really high.

I'm sure it'll be cool to just sit in on a minor blues jam or something. One thing I'd like to do is get a decent amp to bring along so I'm not struggling with someone else's tone....

Really just a matter of making time to sit and work through multiple versions while recording. I'm way too used to throwing something down and not going back to do better versions. Didn't need to in the old days, we were a one-take live band, so I never built up any discipline...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 08, 2007, 11:30:35 AM
The fakebook I did is all over the map. From folkie stuff I play (Ellis Paul, Martin Sexton, Dar Williams, Bill Morrissey, Greg Brown) to 80s stuff ("Take on Me" by a-ha is a fun campfire singalong when everyone's drunk enough, Eurythmics, even "Eye of the Tiger" or whatever) to some standards (Ray Charles, "Puttin' on the Ritz," "Summertime," etc). Basically, it's based on "what would make for a fun time of people swapping tunes."

I can play through most any song in the book -- some more "authentic" sounding than most.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 08, 2007, 11:35:34 AM
I need something like that. I used one in college for jazz standards. But I always had to have my guitar buddy show me the melody lines because I suck at reading music (still). I've got one for renfaire songs (listed at the top of this page). I've also got a few tab books with a crazy plethora of stuff, the White Pages books for Acoustic, Guitar and Bass. Fun to flip through and play a little, but fake books allow for more easy playing of songs, no doubt.

Music purchasing (book and audio) is on hold for a few months while my budget recovers from my new pc (see the $$$ thread in pc forum) and the x-country ski package I bought last night (getting dumped with snow, I'm making the most of it).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Moaner on March 22, 2007, 02:39:07 AM
Rise!

So after about 5 years I finally picked up my guitar again.  It's a PRS which I bought new in '96.  After a quick string change and some tuning I'm amazed at how well this thing has held up.  There is a little rust on the pick ups, the intonation is a little off, and the truss rods need some adjusting but other than that I think it's good to go. 

So, I'm looking for some advice here.  In the past I took my guitars to a man who built classical instruments for students at U of M.  He was fucking amazing to say the least, but he's also dead now.  I'm looking for some help learning to maintain this thing myself but I'm not finding a definitive source easily.  This thing has 4 (I think) Truss rods and that intimidates me.  So, does anyone have a good guide bookmarked that may be of help?  I've done some searches, read the manual that came with the guitar, and visited the PRS site but I'm still not comfy doing it myself.  I guess I just need to buck up and trust in the fact I'm not going to kill the thing?  Normally I'd try without hesitation, but this guitar is my baby.  I'd have sex with it if I thought I could, I like it that much.

Also, I was shocked to see how little I had lost in the way of dexterity.  Within 20 minutes I was shredding almost as well as I used to.  I remember all my scales, most of my theory, and even a few old songs from my band.  I'm almost glad I took the long break as I have not been this excited about playing since I was a teenager. 

Now the hunt for the perfect amp, and now that I actually make money, this should be a blast.  I have GAS again!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 22, 2007, 03:42:49 AM
Don't do it.

I like mucking around with guitars a lot, but I even I wouldn't mess with that.

I don't know why PRS did that really. That kind of truss rod setup is really only necessary for super high tension instruments, like 5 or 6 string basses.


However, a good rule of thumb for a tech is: Find the shop in your town that sells boutique equipment. Top Hats, Orange, Mesas. etc.. Or alternatively, a shop that has a lot of vintage equipment. Like a good one with Fender blackfaces, and not just silvers. More than likely, the guys working there know what they're doing. Or simply, find a PRS dealer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 30, 2007, 07:19:25 AM
omfgdrool (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Gibson-SG-61-Reissue-Antique-Ebony-with-Gold-Hardware-?sku=512788)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 03, 2007, 12:44:26 PM
A few months after I finally buy the MR8HD....they release a MR16HD (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR16HD-16Track-Digital-Recorder?sku=701051). Goddamned technology. Anyone need a great 8-track? ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 13, 2007, 11:19:24 AM
Posted another guitar instrumental, this one from ten years ago.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/04/08/the-sunday-song-the-march-of-the-elephants/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on April 18, 2007, 08:22:43 PM
Virtual Band Idea:

I've come up with a short new song which I play mainly on the ukulele. My idea is that I'll record it as a .wav, upload it somewhere for ya'll to download, you'll add something to it, and then re-upload it for the next guy.

Any takers? I think this could be a fun little side project.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 19, 2007, 08:13:00 AM
Can't hurt. I don't have any permanent upload space though.

Posted another guitar instrumental, this one from ten years ago.
That downslide part is perfect. Great song, might be my favorite of your stuff thus far (I hope that doesn't come across as an insult :P). DADGAD I always associate with Jimmy Page, but leave it to you to put on your crazy capo thingy.

My acoustic's neck was warped to hell for about a month or two, but now it's back to only fretting out on a couple bends :| Gotta get it fixed at some point, not sure it's worth what it'd cost, though. I miss the feel of the acoustic where I can really apply a lot more of my fingerpicking and bass styles (though I'm a horrid fingerpicker technically, I just play normal stuff with my fingers).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 23, 2007, 12:12:09 PM
I'm up for the uke-overdubbing.

Glad you liked the tune, Sky. Me, I associate DADGAD with people like Hedges and Bensusan, but whatever!

I posted some noodling yesterday: http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/04/22/the-sunday-song-pick-em-all-up/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 23, 2007, 01:53:18 PM
Quote
The recording is a bit muddy, and a bit messy — I didn’t actually write parts for anything other than the mandolin, so everything else is just improv and more than a bit rough, since some of the parts stomp each other or collide. But what the hey, it’s dinnertime and I have been working on it for around 6 hours, so I am posting it.
Now you're sounding like me :P Except I don't really write anything ahead of time and don't spend more than 15 minutes or so on stuff. Damned ADHD imo. I did do a version of a Willie Dixon tune I'm fond of, using some backing tracks I got in a book. The backing tracks are real hit-or-miss (the organ parts on Thrill is Gone are obnoxious) but it's nice to get into the swing of playing with a full band again, so I can put a lot more space in my playing (or could if I could). I do want to clean it up some, then I'll post it. Maybe that instrumental Thrill is Gone at some point, too. I've been busy, but as usual it's all sloppy stuff just jamming or jotting down ideas (I wrote a love song, heh).

Banjo debut! Intertube connection at work is being it's usual shit self, so I only got about a quarter in. Nice stuff, you make me want a mandolin :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 25, 2007, 07:42:04 AM
So....

I sold my Vibro-King (at a profit heh). Sweet, sweet amp (if you can recall (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Guitars/VK_and_Jazzmaster.jpg)), but too much amp for me (I mean, to give an indication, freakin' Pete Townsend uses them....and I'm not Pete). It was also very high maintenance ($200+ for tube replacements, for example).

I'll probably get a Deluxe Reverb to replace it. 22 Watter, and unlike the VK, can be saturated at acceptable levels. Good for garages and possibly small clubs.


Anyways, I still have my Vox Valvetronix for now. The preamp's kind of finnicky in it, but it's a cool little thing. Not really an ideal alternative to real valves though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 25, 2007, 09:06:48 AM
I went through the amp dilemma last year iirc (Heh...page 9!). I still don't have a decent amp and I want to start playing at the blues jam nights (I'm part of the local Blues Society, cool group). I just don't have the dough to do it right, right now.

All I have now is my practice Pignose and my old bass practice amp, a 125W Peavey Mk III (run through a 400W 15" EV full-range in a Dean Markley cab). Both sound pretty crappy, even running through my Boss GT6. These days I usually am running direct through my mixer into my Sennheisers, so I'm all set to punch record if I stumble across something cool.

I need to do a LOT of test driving amps because my amp knowledge is circa 1993, and it was all about the MONSTER STACKS. In fact, I'd still like to get a nice Marshall tube half-stack for grins. But in reality, a nice club amp is what I need right now. A 1x12 or 2x10 kinda deal, maybe tubes. I'd prefer to ditch my Boss GT6 for my blues stuff and just use it to record, so an amp that has a good tone and breaks up nicely for leads would be perfect. I had a Peavey 2x12 for a while in the 80s, and it was a nice amp, but might be too beefy for blues.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 25, 2007, 10:29:32 AM
A 1x12 or 2x10 kinda deal, maybe tubes.

Try the Deluxe Reverb I mentioned above. Either that, or a Custom Vibrolux. They break up nicely (to say the least) at acceptable volumes (the Lux can be pretty loud though...But it's wired to break up earlier).



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 25, 2007, 12:14:51 PM
I like loud, I'm an old metal guy ;) But I want to be good in the mix, I'm more of a team player, partly from playing bass for so long (though as a bass player, I had the guitarist tendency to crank my amp...). Lookiloo at musiciansfriend (as I have no dough), the Fender Blues Deluxe looks decent (40W 1x12). The Super Reverb I mentioned before would be nice (45W 4x10), but probably too loud for clubs and too heavy to tug around.

One thing that drives me nuts are all these blues guys that only talk about SRV in the comment threads.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 25, 2007, 12:41:15 PM
The Super Reverb is the pretty the be all end all of blackface Fender amps (while the VK I had was the be all end all for blondes and tweeds, and bassman types).

Yeah, it's a kickass amp. And very loud (remember that Little Johnny Jewel track I posted here awhile back? That was a Super Reverb, but with a Tube Screamer).

Also, there's probably too much headroom than you're looking for. You'll get great clean sounds at very high volumes, but won't hear breakup until the very upper limit.

The Deluxe Reverb I mentioned is basically a mini version of the SR (sort of...it's a little brighter, especially with single coils). Standard blackface sound, but breaks up early.


If you really want to cut into a mix though, high mids is what you should go for. That's where a Vox AC (or an Orange for that matter) kicks everyone's ass. They make single 12" models now, so you should test one out.

[EDIT]

Excuse this guy's guitar face, but he provides a good sample of the Deluxe Reverb for blues playing. This is what it'd sound like through a Gibson once it breaks up. Different story with Fenders, of course.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JlvXI71FKg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JlvXI71FKg)

[edit] Fixed link :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 25, 2007, 01:58:23 PM
I've gotta get more stuff up on the tube.  Note I don't show my face when I play  :-P

I had one good blues jam on my acoustic...but I forgot to put on pants, hehe. Woops, I won't inflict that on you guys.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 25, 2007, 02:01:00 PM
It should be mentioned that that same guy has a Super Reverb vid as well. I think he modded the speakers a bit, but you'll find that it and the Deluxe Reverb are similar in tone with a Gibson. Just one's a fuckload louder than the other.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 26, 2007, 05:56:13 AM
I recently acquired a Marshall MG 250DFX.  After 9 years of never having an amplifier that worked, this thing is quite impressive.  Sure, it's digital and doesn't use tubes, therefore I'm not ready to be a professional just yet, but I love the sound it gives to my crappy guitars ;-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 26, 2007, 06:28:34 AM
I had something similar at one time (actually, I had the exact amp, I think. Except it was an older model with just chorus). Never could get into those Marshalls though (I mean, Marshall from the 80's to Present). Great high gain, shredding sound... But not much in the way of simple overdrive and cleans. Especially with Fenders and single coil guitars, which sound pretty atrocious with them.

Not that I don't like metal or anything, but I always feel limited with them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 26, 2007, 06:55:20 AM
Reading a guitar history book (see the Book Thread). Turns out we tabtards are traditionalists. Next time some haughty sight-reader of 'traditional' notation gives you shit for being a tabtard (dunno 'bout you guys, I get shit all the time from jazztards and the like, but I was in school and whatnot), tell them that what we call tablature now is how guitar was originally transcribed in the 16th century. I flipped the first time I turned the page and saw a sheet of 16th century music in tablature!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 26, 2007, 07:08:32 AM
I don't play with too many notation readers really. One of my friends is a trumpet player, but he's easy to communicate ideas with. There's another friend who plays piano. She isn't difficult about it or anything, but she gets preachy sometimes (but in a nice way).

I've ran into strangers across the years though that sound like the jazz guys you mention, but not much.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 26, 2007, 07:17:07 AM
Pretty cool.

http://damncoolpics.blogspot.com/2007/04/lego-guitar.html (http://damncoolpics.blogspot.com/2007/04/lego-guitar.html)

(http://bp0.blogger.com/_mmBw3uzPnJI/RipwlR37UHI/AAAAAAAADf4/759qBsr4O0k/s400/lego_guitar_05.jpg)


Not sure why he put real pickups in it though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 27, 2007, 08:27:55 PM
Jazz players can't talk -- a jazz guitar lead sheet isn't much more than the main riff in notation, and a set of chords.

Tablature is a superior notation for stringed plucked instruments because timbre varies from string to string and position to position. In jazz guitar, for example, they avoid playing open strings because of this fact. 5 on the E and 0 on the A just sound different; and 4 on the G and 0 on the B sound WAY different.

If only tab also notated some of the other subtleties -- like strum hand position. After all, timbre varies significantly depending on whether you are playing by the bridge, soundhole, or close to the neck. Naturally, you electric players cheat and just adjust your pickups to only pick up the stuff you want. Us acoustic guys get to mix it up personally, analog, just by moving our hand!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 27, 2007, 09:33:43 PM
Naturally, you electric players cheat and just adjust your pickups to only pick up the stuff you want.
Those of us with a guitar that has 2 dead sets of pickups and only one working set actually get to do this too!  It's amazing how you can vary the way a string is played just by moving the position you strum from.  I've always done this instead of using nifty effects that fancy-pants professionals use.  I like to think it makes me cooler, but it really doesn't (at least my mom likes me).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 27, 2007, 09:42:00 PM
Yeah, you misunderstand us electric guys Raph ;). Perhaps it's a little more subtle, but positioning is still used for changing timbre on electrics too. Probably more with certain styles than others (say, country players who transition between chicken pickin' leads high on their bridges and then into the low end for those bassy Johnny Cash/Duane Eddy type rhythms).

I know there's some songs of mine where changing to a neck pickup just doesn't get what I want -- but playing low with a bridge pickup setting hits the timbre I'm looking for.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 28, 2007, 04:38:25 AM
I was just teasing. I do have that 62 Melody maker, remember? It's got 2 P90s in it... so I know how it works. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 30, 2007, 07:52:26 AM
And some of us are stringed instrumentalists, the electric is only one of several instruments we play :P I'm in a money crunch (still) with trying to buy a house, but I want to get a bit more variety in my lineup: a mandolin, a resonator, a charango, a lute, some early guitars like chittarinos or something. But I love playing my acoustic equally as much as my electric, there's so much you can do on it that you can't do on the other, they're extremely complementary. And honestly, I'm still getting used to pickup switching and playing with volumes and tones. The SG is great for that (like the Les Paul), my old guitars were so shitty I was better off not touching the electronics!

As for rt-hand position, it's critical in some tunes. When I play All Your Love by Otis Rush, where it breaks into the solo arpeggiated triad, it's nice to move up close to the neck and get a real nice rich ringing tone, and when you slide down to the Bm triad it usually sends shivers down my spine.

Conversely, I like to play right on the bridge for the opening of Wish You Were Here by Floyd. That song has served me so well back when I'd sit in with hippies and use it as trade for reefers. Right-hand position subtlety gave me an edge over a lot of other guitarists, because Floyd used a few sounds on that track.

Wrote a new song last night at 1am, my poor landlord. I can direct-in to my recorded but the vocals...well, I'm loud. At least I don't have my drums there. It's a new spin on Kind-Hearted Woman, with a little Allman-y feel to the vocals (at least that's where I want it to end up, I'm not a great vocalist).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 01, 2007, 05:32:43 AM
I went to the London Guitar Show this weekend. As its the UK hardly any of the big names had stands, and wasnt much on show that really took my fancy as i did plan on buying a V with a Floyd Rose. Played around on the Dean stall (low end models nice, high end 2900 GBP USA Dean new Razorback V model was incredibly disappointing), with some rather nice ESPs, watched the Sikth (http://www.sikth.com/) guitarists do a demo, which was awesome power/extreme metal/mathcore, and caught a bit of Phil Hilborne and Nicko McBrain doing their usual LGS show, which included guest vocals by Bruce Dickinson.

The highlight of the show had to be:

BlackMachine Guitars (http://www.blackmachine.net/)

In particular, one with handwound Nailbomb pickups (http://www.bareknucklepickups.co.uk/ZH-nailbomb.html) that we played through a Diezel amp and cab (http://www.diezel.ch/en/news/download_read.php?mode=listall)

Wow, just wow. Once you've played a luthier made guitar using handmade pickups and through a handbuilt amp, (total cost of setup was roughly 8000 GBP) nothing will be ever be quite the same again.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 01, 2007, 09:55:41 AM
I can't emphasize how badass that VK I had was. It was handmade too -- the only handmade amps Fender does anymore (that can be had through retail channels at least). It was one of the first ones they made at that.

But....Like I said. It was too much amp for me.

My pickups are custom as well (Curtis Novak (http://www.curtisnovak.com/pickups/jazzmaster.shtml)). As is my main stompbox (http://www.klon-siberia.com/).


The weak link in the chain is my guitar --- but I meticulously set it up myself. Down to sanding the small moving parts. That counts for something, right?  :-D


Heh. Actually, as far as guitars go, I'd want vintage more than some custom job. If only because the feel of a played in neck is superior to anything else. And can't really be replicated. Besides, guitars back then were made with more personal care too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on May 01, 2007, 10:02:36 AM
This is why I'm not impressed by the Trans-Siberian Orchestra.  My cousin, by himself in his homemade studio, basically did what it took them a ton more people and money to accomplish.  He's even started playing drums now, damn him.

Christmas Rush, as he's titled it (http://travisaustin.bluedomino.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/thechristmasrush.mp3)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 01, 2007, 10:13:58 AM
I haven't heard anything from them except....whatever that song is that gets played on the radio a lot.



Anyhow, he recorded it well. Not to criticize too much or anything, but is he only playing the snare part? Sounds like the rest of the drum kit is a drum machine.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 01, 2007, 11:18:17 AM
Much as I would liike a decent amp, I live in a small flat, so my amp is an old Peavy thing of my bro's that I think is broken and is little more than a speaker for the POD.  More often than not I run guitar into POD into earphones. My next guitar is going to be something spiky, EMGs or Nailbombs, with a Floyd, 12-70s and tuned so low the strings flap in the wind.

Brutal.

 :rock:

Quote
I haven't heard anything from them except....whatever that song is that gets played on the radio a lot.

I think TSO only release Christmas stuff? The website didn't show much else.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 01, 2007, 11:29:08 AM
Actually, as far as guitars go, I'd want vintage more than some custom job. If only because the feel of a played in neck is superior to anything else. And can't really be replicated. Besides, guitars back then were made with more personal care too.
I can't imagine a guitar feeling better in my hands than my 61 reissue (except, I guess, a 61 SG but I think Townshend broke them all ;)). I lament the Taylor classical I let slip by me last year, it's literally the only classical I've ever played that didn't feel like a plank (http://invention.smithsonian.org/centerpieces/guitars/images/eg08.jpg). I'm bringing my Alvarez back into shape, the neck was a bit out of whack for a few months there but I have hope for her. She plays pretty damned nice for an acoustic.

I want to get a cheapish acoustic to have here at the office so I can work on some stuff during lunch now and again, I just hate wasting money on cheap guitars that play like shit. Maybe one of those trashy high school classicals or something. I'm still considering a Baby Taylor, but that's too nice to leave sitting at the office imo.

Llava, if I didn't say it last time you posted his stuff, he's Splendid.

Penfold, you'd like my bass, it's EXTREME SPIKY. I'd have to take a picture, can't find any online (it's from the ESP shop in hollyweird).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 01, 2007, 11:45:04 AM
Yeah, that's all I'm saying. A real 61 would be better. Just for the neck alone.

And 61 (and pre) PAF pickups are another story entirely. All of them were custom back then, so Gibson doesn't have any set spec to replicate them in a reissue. Unfortunately, this is what makes them so difficult to get your hands on now. 50's and 60's Gibson pickups alone (not the guitars) sell up to $10,000 a piece.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 01, 2007, 05:31:16 PM

I want to get a cheapish acoustic to have here at the office so I can work on some stuff during lunch now and again, I just hate wasting money on cheap guitars that play like shit. Maybe one of those trashy high school classicals or something. I'm still considering a Baby Taylor, but that's too nice to leave sitting at the office imo.

I keep my Baby at the office. Also one of those Nomad electrics with the built-in speakers (the Star Wars limited edition, no less). I always say it sounds like a dying duck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on May 01, 2007, 08:31:27 PM
I haven't heard anything from them except....whatever that song is that gets played on the radio a lot.



Anyhow, he recorded it well. Not to criticize too much or anything, but is he only playing the snare part? Sounds like the rest of the drum kit is a drum machine.

Nope, he said it's "live acoustic drums" performed by him.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 01, 2007, 08:48:19 PM
Ah cool. Just a variance in the snare level I guess. Good job though, I dig it :).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Der Helm on May 05, 2007, 05:05:38 AM
OK, that other thread did it for me. I am definitely going to buy a new guitar. The problem is, I do not know what to look out for. Almost 15 years ago (wow, that is a really long time *shudder*) bought a guitar and tried to play. Sadly I never took any lessons and the thing I bought was one broken piece of shit, even friends of mine who where really good players at that time found it frustrating to play.

So, any good advice (apart from the "practice, practice, practice part, I know that already :-D ) on what kind of instrument I should look out for ?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on May 05, 2007, 05:29:34 AM
OK, that other thread did it for me. I am definitely going to buy a new guitar. The problem is, I do not know what to look out for. Almost 15 years ago (wow, that is a really long time *shudder*) bought a guitar and tried to play. Sadly I never took any lessons and the thing I bought was one broken piece of shit, even friends of mine who where really good players at that time found it frustrating to play.

So, any good advice (apart from the "practice, practice, practice part, I know that already :-D ) on what kind of instrument I should look out for ?
I haven't shopped for a guitar in a long long time and I'm not sure what's available where you are at but my suggestion would be to start with a Fender Standard Stratocaster since those should be relatively easy to find (there are a lot of different Stratocaster models, the Standard is one of the cheaper ones). If you remember some basic barr cords try out the fingerboard and study how it feels playing it (or holding it as the case may be :D) standing up wearing a strap and sitting down, paying special attention to the feel and shape of the back of the fingerboard (the way it curves). That plus the shape/size of your hand is going to dictate in large part how comfortable and easy the guitar will be to play for you.

Then just start comparing the Strat to other guitars in your price range and pick one you like.

Edit: typos


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 05, 2007, 10:06:30 AM
Just find a guitar shop with a lot of decent guitars and try each one. You don't have to be able to play them well, just see how each feels in your hands. That's the most important thing, you can always change pickups to get a different sound, but neck/body feel is critical, even in a cheap guitar. If it's awkward to play, you'll be less likely to practice as often.

I planned on getting a strat when I got my sg, so keep an open mind and try 'em all :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Jimbo on May 05, 2007, 11:09:58 AM
Agree with Sky, I had no idea I would have picked up a Gibson Corvus II back in '85, still have it and just got it re-strung and tuned up...now to find a small practice amp (I could get a mini-stack from Marshall, Carvin, Mesa Boogie, etc...), was thinking of getting an Ibanez or Kramer back then (would have been there budget guitars) and the quality on the Corvus was much better than the cheap imports by Kramer and Ibanez.  I owe it to my 11 year old for having picked it up again, he is jamming on the keyboard and violin and sometimes he strums my guitar, wish I had his ear (he figured out Ode to Joy & Star Spangled Banner on the keyboard by ear).  I used to date a gal that had a beautiful Ovation, would love to have one of those too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 07, 2007, 06:35:31 AM
Whenever I practice major scale stuff (my kryptonite), I end up slipping into the First Noel for some reason. My ears just pick it out every time.

On my thinking about getting a Baby or something for the office...now I'm thinking of maybe getting a strat instead. Maybe a tele. If I can get a decent one on the cheap, anyway. Thing is, the local blues jam (which I'm getting up the fortitude to join in) was in a nice, safe hotel bar for a year. Now it's in the damn ghetto and I'm not bringing a $1500 guitar there! And, of course, I was thinking of playing this wednesday...but they invited the local media to film the event  :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on May 07, 2007, 08:43:43 PM
Now it's in the damn ghetto and I'm not bringing a $1500 guitar there!
I love my $60 guitar for this reason.  I'd be very unhappy if someone stole it just because it has such sentimental value, but it sure doesn't look like something that would command high dollar.  I even used to carry it around in an old Target bag back before I managed to locate a case for it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 08, 2007, 07:04:56 AM
I have a cheap guitar (free), but it's set up for slide, the action is wicked high and I keep it in open G. I guess I could bring it and play slide, but I'm trying to learn how to sing the tunes I play on slide, especially I Can't Be Satisfied and Kind Hearted Woman. I posted a version of Satisfied here played on that crappy guitar a while back. I can cover maybe better than half of each, but that just don't cut it in my thinking ;)

Just looked up the jampod thing we tallked about a long time ago (plug your guitar into the ipod and play along)...doesn't work with 5G ipods :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 14, 2007, 06:54:10 AM
Continuing from the Live Music thread...last week was a great music week. Great blues jam Wednesday and Guy Davis Saturday. Also picked up Andy Aledort's Hendrix DVD. I was a big Hendrix fan when I was a kid, some of the first stuff I played badly on guitar. He does a nice job laying things out if you know what you're about, for beginners it would be real rough. I only intended on learning Little Wing (finally..and in preparation of learning the SRV version, which is one of my guitar milestones I want to hit), but I just started playing along from the beginning and ended up working on Spanish Castle Magic, inserting my own solos (of course!).

Good stuff, ten bones is a pittance for inspiration imo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 14, 2007, 07:04:26 AM
Little Wing is quite a milestone, but was never anything I've tried. I always wanted to get a feel for Jimi's funk oriented riffs though (Ezy Ryder, Crosstown Traffic, and especially Straight Ahead). I love those funky little grooves he was doing later in his life.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 14, 2007, 09:18:23 AM
Thank you for this thread...

I spent a good portion of my weekend listening to some CD's and reminding myself why I need to play my bass more.  My finger tips are still sore from about 8h playing and I'm embarrassed by how much my skills have deteriorated since I used to play professionally.  I have a mid-1970's Fender Jazz that I play through a crappy old crate bass head and a homemade 2x12 enclosure (sold most of my gear 10+ years ago).  I have a few pedals that I like to mess with (phaser, chorus, compressor) but usually opt for a mid-supressed, clean sound. I play mostly with my fingers but will play with a pick when the mood strikes me.  I prefer a softer pick for running and a hard pick when I want attack punch.  Anyway, I thought I'd share the list of CD's with you guys.  It's a mixed bag of styles, but the techniques were a great exercise in humility. 

The Best of Larry Graham and Graham Central Station:  Great funk groove with some great slap techniques in E.

Jaco Pastorius, Self titled:  While I think Jaco was a bit more self-indulgent than musical, songs like Donna Lee are an outstanding example of breaking the typical jazz bass mold. Great harmonics exercises.

Stanley Clarke, School Days: Classic combination of scales, funk, and chording.  One of the kings of bass guitar.

Cream, Disraeli Gears: Jack Bruce and his no nonsense style.  Always fun to emulate.

Rush, Circumstances:  I have a hard enough time trying to play the title track without trying to imagine singing it as well.  Geddy Lee is one bassist that reminds me that I'll never be more than average technically.  I spent a lot of time retraining myself to double pick with my fingers.  I need work.

Yes, Fragile: Christopher Squire... need I say more. The circular scale patterns give me fits on occasion.  I find I can actually play this stuff better when I just stop tring to think about what I'm doing and just let it flow. 

Beatles, Revolver and Sgt. Pepper:  While not all that difficult technically, I always get great pleasure from playing songs like Taxman and A Day in the Life.  I enjoy McCartney's musical style as it's both rhythmic and approachable.

Victor Wooten, Live in America:  This guy is a bit all over the place, but there's no denying his natural talent.  Great practice for hammer, funk, and harmonics work.  If I had 1/10th of this guy's natural ability, I'd die a happy man. 

Primus, They Can't all be zingers: While I love Claypool for his talent, he can get to be a bit repetitive.  His singing grates on me after a while as well, but I think there's a lot to be learned from his style. 

Note: I made this list from memory, so I apologize for any errors. 



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 14, 2007, 09:26:37 AM
McCartney doesn't get enough credit as a bass player imo.


Besides him and Jack Bruce, your tastes confuse me a little (nothing wrong with others though, of course). I always thought you were more into the "no nonsense" Motown type grooves, but it seems like you're more into progressive and virtuosic stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 14, 2007, 09:29:37 AM
Besides him and Jack Bruce, your tastes confuse me a little (nothing wrong with others though, of course). I always thought you were more into the "no nonsense" Motown type grooves, but it seems like you're more into progressive and virtuosic stuff.

Stray, I think I'm confusing in that the music I enjoy listening to is often very different than the music I learn from.  You're right in that I enjoy a more straightforward approach in the music I listen to, but these cd's are a staple for educating myself as a musician.  I don't want to directly emulate these guys, but they do a great deal to help me grow in my playing repertoire. Does that make sense?  I also wanted to offer up this as a list of cd's that have a lot to offer the bass community.  It's a diverse collection of some of the most talented bass players across genres. 

This weekend also had me wishing I still had my early 70's Rick 4001.  I'm going to start browsing eBay to see if I can find another one.  I miss the growl that only a Rick with flatwounds can provide. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 14, 2007, 03:27:42 PM
Looking back it seems I didn't even buy a guitar until page 7 of this thread, and now I'm on my fourth, a sign, I suspect, that I could be turning into a collector. The low price of the dollar has driven the US guitar market prices right down, even in the UK, which is why I've managed to pick up a Jackson Custom Shop Soloist.

(http://img120.imagevenue.com/loc418/th_79938_CS_Soloist_21_122_418lo.jpg) (http://img120.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=79938_CS_Soloist_21_122_418lo.jpg)   (http://img14.imagevenue.com/loc1049/th_80032_CS_Soloist_20_122_1049lo.jpg) (http://img14.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=80032_CS_Soloist_20_122_1049lo.jpg)

More or less my dream guitar seeing I love the Chlorine Blue Quilt top that their custom shop do.  The Dimarzio Evolution pickups scream like a b***h, very hot. One of the strings is broken so I will replace them all with 9s and give the fret a clean, and then wrestle with the Floyd for a bit as I learn to string one. I've helped my friend restring his but not quite the same when sitting there alone.  I'll probably take it down the local shop to get the tech to set it up for some heavier strings and lower tunings at a later point, I'm not 100% sure on innotations and if I need extra springs etc and its too expensive to experiment on. 

As my playing abilties are coming on a bit slower than I am capable of (laziness really), it's a bit of a case of a newbie driver buying himself a V8, but I can see this lasting me a very long time.

I have been experimenting with recording over the weekend, playing about with the track in colloboration thread, as well as some of my own metal tunes. Its nice to actually hear things that sound like music and for it to all start gradually coming together.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 14, 2007, 03:48:53 PM
Really nice. Cool idea to go with maple too.

I've never had a shredder like that myself, but I've always wanted one. Kind of sucks when you get in that mood, and all you've got are Fenders and Gibsons (which is to say, they can wail plenty -- but they can't scream ;).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 15, 2007, 07:14:29 AM
When I was playing bass, my main inspirations were Geezer Butler and Steve Harris. Geez for the bluesy jamming (actually the basis of my current blues led playing, heh...everyone said I played bass like a lead guitar and now I play lead guitar like I played bass...) and Steve for the omg thumping rhythms. Imo there weren't a whole lot of good role models for metal bass players, and I didn't (and mostly still don't) like jazz. Oh, and Cliff Burton of course. Monster fingers and great theory, he is what turned me onto incorporating classical fingerpicking on the bass.

You think you're bummed about your technique? I used to be at the very physical limits of what I could do on the bass. Fast fingers, great chording, a triplet that only Steve Harris could beat...I miss impressing the shit out of every band I met in CA, it was great for the ego. Funny, because I always saw my limitations and don't consider myself braggy, I jsut honestly admitted my skills, but a lot of people thought I had a big ego. Some folks never truly listen to you, though, and hear how much I know I don't know and how much I daily strove to be better, practicing a solid eight hours a day back then when I was in a band (and in music school for a while). Bah. Played a bit last night and tore my fingers up, which is good for my guitar fingerstyle.

You should also add the mighty Duck Dunn to your list. Stax records stuff like Albert King's  Born Under A Bad Sign. There's also a book called What Duck Done that's been on my Amazon wishlist for a while.

Penfold - that's a hot guitar. When I was still playing guitar in my band (metal), I had a strat knockoff loaded with EMGs (the /other/ hot pickup) and a really nice pearl white finish BC Rich Bich with a rosewood fretboard. Unfortunately, I broke my Rich :| and never had money to get a decent guitar after that. The gear I used to play when I was in a band was actually pretty sad, but I feel it taught me how to pull a great sound out of subpar gear. Basically I used a Proco Rat into a clean amp head (Kasino or summat) I got at a hock shop. Later I got a Laney full stack, but I never liked it as much (the speakers, yes, 8x12 celestions).

Our other guitarist had a super hot Ibanez custom he picked up in Hollywood, it had a really cool polychrome purple/blue finish (like those shirts that change color depending on the angle).

I never liked the floating bridges or tremolo bars, I always took 'em off my guitars. I did have a locking nut on both my guitars, those are nice. Floyd Rose...ecch, I've played a few, not my style.

When you get it worked on, be sure to ask the tech if you can look over his shoulder. Ask questions if he doesn't mind. A good guitar is never a bad investment, imo!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 15, 2007, 07:44:43 AM
Nothing but love for trem bars here. I wish I sounded like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASF30_WXL9E). MBV is sex.

I've always dug the more traditional (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adue3e3blO4) stuff as well. The guy who taught how to play was an old surf guitarist, and that's never left me.


And I freakin' love those harmonic dives (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TpYcA9bSaU&mode=related&search=) Dimebag used to pull off. They're the only reason why I'd want a shredder axe. Otherwise, Jazzmasters and Jags are fine by me.


I like pretty much whatever I can do to warp guitar sounds. Whether it be with different tunings or effects or slides or trem bars.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on May 15, 2007, 01:02:03 PM
I'm in the market for an acoustic resonator. If it's old an worn, that's great since I'll be using it for slide guitar. I don't mind buying online since I can be less particular about quality since it'll be set up for slide.

If you guys are selling one, or happen to see one, let me know?

Thanks


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 15, 2007, 01:05:03 PM
You can get new ones pretty cheap.

Or relatively cheap. I mean, you're not going find anything good for $50 if that's what you're after. I wouldn't even recommend any of those off brands under $200.


Here's the cheapest Regal (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Regal-RD30-Resonator?sku=518044) for $260.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on May 15, 2007, 01:12:54 PM
Yeah, I'm looking at the 200-300 dollar range. I don't have any experience with guitar makers other than the big names. Do you have any good info on lower end guitar makers? I'm not good enough to take advantage of having a really nice guitar. I sound the same either way.

edit: Also, what about ebaying instruments? Any experience with that?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 15, 2007, 01:25:03 PM
Regal is good (they range from semi-budget to pricey). They're one of the only companies that specializes in them these days (and they've been around since the 30's).

National/Dobro is the more expensive brand. The truly old school resonator maker. They're owned by Gibson now. Don't bother though -- Their cheapest instruments are still in the $1000 range.

Fender is Fender. I've messed with them a bunch in stores. Servicable quality like their acoustics, but nothing to get crazy about. You can't really go wrong with one though.


Off brands are crap like "Rogue" that you see at GC or Musicians Friend. Sometimes another store may have the same exact Korean made guitars under a different brand name. Don't bother. Don't buy electrics, acoustics, or anything else from these companies. You're lucky if they're even set up right when you get them -- or even warped -- and even if they are, they'll magically fall apart in your hands eventually. Don't buy off brand electronics either (even practice amps). They'll crap out on you and sound like shit anyways.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on May 15, 2007, 05:51:03 PM
Thanks Stray. I'll see if I can find a Regal around here. I'm excited to get a resonator because I love the sound they give my blues, and if I develop my slide stuff I'll have a real good time. My biggest problem with slide is an alternating bass line. I've started to play with fingerpicks, but I broke my hand in a motorcycle accident once and my ring finger doesn't cooperate well. With any luck I'll be able to work with a two finger setup.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 15, 2007, 06:21:16 PM
I can't do alternating bass lines with slide. A whole lot of pros can't either. Hell, not even Robert Johnson did that (though he'd move to bass parts at the closing of a verse or whatnot, or maybe just do a simple pluck on the open bottom string).

[EDIT] Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying.

If you're going for pick heavy slide playing, you're going to have more difficulty alternating through certain types of bass parts. Picking is better for focusing on leads.

If you want a fuller rhythm slide sound with bass parts, drop the pick. Pluck everything.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on May 15, 2007, 06:55:15 PM
I'm tuned to open D, and my typical playing is something like a low D bass line, then work my way up the strings for licks and back down to the D for a bass line. I don't sing at all, so I use the high D(and other strings, but mainly the D) like my vocal and the low D in between. That's how I get around alternating bass.

While I'm not as loud without a pick, I pretty much play with a bare thumb and forefinger.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 16, 2007, 05:27:53 AM
Hmm, can't say I give much advice for open D.

I play open D a lot, but rarely do it for sliding (I like open E and G, and even this weird Gm tuning I sort of..made up. I think.).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on May 16, 2007, 06:26:16 AM
Nothing but love for trem bars here. I wish I sounded like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASF30_WXL9E). MBV is sex.

I've always dug the more traditional (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adue3e3blO4) stuff as well. The guy who taught how to play was an old surf guitarist, and that's never left me.


And I freakin' love those harmonic dives (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TpYcA9bSaU&mode=related&search=) Dimebag used to pull off. They're the only reason why I'd want a shredder axe. Otherwise, Jazzmasters and Jags are fine by me.


I like pretty much whatever I can do to warp guitar sounds. Whether it be with different tunings or effects or slides or trem bars.

I'm still upset whenever I see a Dime vid, such a waste.  Tom Morello is also one for making sounds that don't sound like he's playing it on a guitar. The Dragonforce guys have some excellent whammy tricks (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtUiQJc7ZMI) too. I can't get enough of Dragonforce, video game music+ridiculously fast dual lead shredding+tons of tricks=teh fun.
 
Doubt anyone else here is into metal as much as I am, but for that type of music the ESP Ltd range is the best quality and guitars for the 300-900GBP bracket, played 3 or 4 of the models and they've all played and sounded really nice, on the higher end Korean made Ltds you get original brand electronics and hardware too (EMGs, original Floyd's and other bridges, Sperzel tuners etc), something lacking from most other makes at that price. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 16, 2007, 08:47:12 AM
Hmm, can't say I give much advice for open D.

I play open D a lot, but rarely do it for sliding (I like open E and G, and even this weird Gm tuning I sort of..made up. I think.).
Iirc, open D and E are just a whole step different, same intervals. Open G is the oddball (and the one I play in, because lots of the delta blues guys used it). You could also look into clawhammer banjo style, it only uses thumb + 1, again iirc.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 16, 2007, 08:57:42 AM
The voicing just sits with me better in Open E. It's just one of those weird things...

The tension level on my guitars is better set up for the tightness of E as well. It just doesn't feel right sliding in D to me. I play completely different in D.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 16, 2007, 01:28:48 PM
My open G guitar is set up wicked high action and like a friggin' high tension wire. Great for sliding, though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on May 16, 2007, 02:17:12 PM
Guitar-ish question:

I've been wanting to start 'playing' again.  'Playing' being used very loosely.  Problem is, I don't have anyone to noodle or jam around with.  I'm mostly selftaught, and pretty much suck.  But I enjoy(ed) it nonetheless.  Anyway, what I am looking for is something that I can throw a CD in or other media in which music is saved, start it up, and play along with it with my guitar mixed in.  The ghetto version would just be to turn up my stereo to a decent level to match my amp, but that's not really feasible with a 5.5 month old in the house.  Something that mixes the guitar/amp with the music and with a headphone output would be ideal.

Anything like that, or am I SOL?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 16, 2007, 02:26:53 PM
Tascam has this guitar trainer thing I've seen around. I haven't used it though, so I'm not sure if it works well.

http://www.tascam.com/Products/cdgt1mkii.html (http://www.tascam.com/Products/cdgt1mkii.html)

Basically, it's a portable CD player that allows you to "cancel" out guitar sounds on CD's, so you can jam along with songs (I'm really not sure how it accomplishes that, since there aren't multiple tracks for CD audio). Basically, it's karaoke for guitarists.

It also allows you to change tempo and loop parts to help you learn riffs better.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on May 16, 2007, 04:06:58 PM
Very cool, that's exactly what I was looking for - thanks.  Good set of earphones and I'll be living arena rock dreams in my living room and scaring the shit out of the dog.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on May 18, 2007, 09:12:52 AM
And what about keyboards? I was thinking of buying one to use for input to a computer. I'd want a semi-nice once, but I don't know the first thing about them. I'd expect it to have a few different sounds, i.e. piano and synth and strings. I really dont know what I'm looking at as far as keyboards go, so if you've got any experience I'd appreciate it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 18, 2007, 09:29:55 AM
This may seem like a ghetto choice, but you really can't go wrong just starting with a simple Yamaha. They have enough decent, built in instruments to have fun with, as well as MIDI connectivity to expand on that. Most of them usually come with helpful training materials, so you can at least throw down some chords in no time. Just get something with at least 61 keys and you'll be set.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 23, 2007, 08:18:53 AM
I dunno, I really want to get a keyboard for the old lady. She used to play, and now she feels I'm pressuring her too much. Hell, I just want someone to jam with, and she only needs three chords to get up and running on the blues, I'm not expecting Billy Powell (Skynyrd, great keyboarder). My motto is 'if you had bought (instrument x) when you first said you wanted to, you'd have been playing for (x years) already!'. The president of our blues society got that one last week when he was pining away about playing bass.

You just gotta jump in feet first and swim to shore, imo. Best way to learn is to start playing.

Anyway, I want to get something with full keys and good weights so it feels like a real piano. Good natural piano sound, maybe a leslie sound, probably wouldn't need any other gadgety stuff. Looks like anything decent is in the $1000+ range.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 28, 2007, 01:57:38 PM
Posted another old track. Stretch Williams on lead guitar, me on the acoustic. It's a blues, Stray & Sky. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/05/27/the-sunday-song-share-some-secrets/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 29, 2007, 07:59:11 AM
Cool on the whole, gets a bit too jazzy for my tastes. I like the kinda darker tone, though. I've been too lax in recording to share :(

I've written a couple nice stubs, though. Good beginnings to songs, seeds. I'm just not used to doing all the fleshing and finishing by myself, curse of having a band full of talented writers. I'd bring in a stub and have a full song an hour later.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 17, 2007, 08:12:39 PM
Posted this from gak, maybe 1998. Off analog tape. Tune's still fun though.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/06/17/the-sunday-song-son-de-don-con



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 18, 2007, 01:41:38 PM
Oh snappity snap.

We hosted a jazz night with a great local musician last week, my band had recorded our only studio work with him in Jan 91. On a lark (because one of my core beliefs is the closed mouth does not get fed), I asked if he still had our master laying around. Not only did he remember the session, he said he had the tape.

I didn't post it here, because I frankly didn't want to get my hopes up. We had little money and he said he was probably going to record over the master. The last copy I had of that tape was one a fan had given me and went missing (ok, stolen) a solid twelve years ago.

Just got back from the studio, master in hand!  :-o :-D :heart:

Now the problem is getting it off this 8-track reel to digital files so I can remix it to cd and try to look up my old band members' addresses and sent them this incredible find out of the blue.

It's a goddamned good day...hopefully I can find someone to do the transfer...I still can't believe it and I'm looking at the tape.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 18, 2007, 01:46:45 PM
Posted this from gak, maybe 1998. Off analog tape. Tune's still fun though.
You say it like it's a bad thing. I liked the sound of it, I favor rough live-sounding recordings. Was always getting into trouble when I was in school for that. Might be my favorite of yours, nice and vibrant, and as you say, rockin'.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on June 19, 2007, 06:30:38 PM
Just got a new 12-string acoustic by Carlo Robelli.  Sam Ash was giving them away.  Now I just need to learn how to play.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 01, 2007, 11:34:12 PM
I was adding a half dozen tunes to my fakebook tonight (prompted by the Paul Simon Gershwin Prize special on PBS) and I thought I would post the song list. I can play anything on this list, to varying degrees of competency depending on how recently I have played it and how often I play it. That's with the book in front of me, of course. No book, and all bets are off. :)

The book was designed after The Fat Man's famous fakebook from his 20-year running jam session in Austin. My song list has almost no overlap with his, however. Basically, it's built for drunken singalongs, campfires, song circles, that sort of thing. You'll notice a lot of the singer-songwriter stuff I like. Euro readers will note that there is actually a recent a-ha song in there (American readers will be dismayed and somewhat boggled). Also, there's an Xmas tunes section at the back, but I didn't bother listing it.

PS, yes, I know, I am missing a ton of Beatles stuff that ought to be in there.

0-9
1952 Vincent Black Lightning - Richard Thompson
3,000 Miles – Ellis Paul
32 Flavors – Ani diFranco

A
Across the Universe – The Beatles
Addicted to Love – Robert Palmer
Africa – Toto
Afterglow - INXS
Against All Odds – Phil Collins
Ain’t No Sunshine – Bill Withers
All Along the Watchtower - Bob Dylan
Alleluia - Dar Williams
Allentown  - Billy Joel
America – Simon & Garfunkel
American Tune – Paul Simon
A Most Peculiar Man – Simon & Garfunkel
And She Was – Talking Heads
Angel From Montgomery – John Prine
Angeline – James McMurtry
Another Folk Song - Uncle Bonsai
Ants Marching – Dave Matthews Band
April Come She Will - Simon and Garfunkel
Are You Happy Now? – Richard Shindell
Are You Out There - Dar Williams
As Close to Flying - Christine Lavin

B
Baby’s Gone Blues – Reckless Kelly
Bad to the Bone – George Thorogood
Bamboleo – Gipsy Kings
The Bare Necessities – Jungle Book movie
Beautiful Wreck – Shawn Mullins
Because the Night – Bruce Springsteen
Beer Run – Todd Snider
Bein' Green – The Muppet Movie
Biko – Peter Gabriel
Billie Jean - Michael Jackson
Billy From The Hills - Greg Brown
Birches - Bill Morrissey
Black Horse and the Cherry Tree – KT Tunstall
Black Sheep – Martin Sexton
Blacktop Train – Ellis Paul
Black Velvet – Alannah Myles
Blister in the Sun - Violent Femmes
Blood and Fire - Indigo Girls
Blow ‘Em Away – Chuck Brodsky
Blowin’ in the Wind - Bob Dylan
Born to Be Wild - Steppenwolf
Boy in the Bubble - Paul Simon
A Boy Named Sue – Johnny Cash
Boys of Summer  - Don Henley
Breakfast at Tiffany's - Deep Blue Something
Bridge Over Troubled Water – Simon & Garfunkel
Broken Wings – Mr. Mister
Brown Eyed Girl – Van Morrison
Burning Down the House – Talking Heads

C
California Dreamin’ - The Mamas and the Papas
Castanets - Alejandro Escovedo
Cat Came Back - Harry S. Miller
Cat Came Back (Muppets version)
Cat’s in the Cradle - Harry Chapin
Center Stage - Indigo Girls
The Chain – Fleetwood Mac
Changed the Locks - Lucinda Williams
Christians and the Pagans - Dar Williams
Chrome Plated Heart - Melissa Etheridge
Cinnamon Girl – Neil Young
Closer to Fine - Indigo Girls
Close to You – The Carpenters
Comes Love – Billie Holiday
Come Together – The Beatles
Coming Up for Air - Patty Larkin
Conversation With a Ghost – Ellis Paul
Copacabana - Barry Manilow
Copperhead Road – Steve Earle
Cradle and All – Ani diFranco
Crime for Crime – Ani diFranco

D
Dancing Queen - ABBA
Dangling Conversation - Simon & Garfunkel
Dear Abby - John Prine
Deep Soul Diver  - disappear fear
Desire – U2
Devil Inside – INXS
Diamond In The Rough - Shawn Colvin
Don't Ask Me Why  - Billy Joel
Down by the River – Neil Young
Downeaster 'Alexa' - Billy Joel
Down Under – Men at Work
Dude (Looks Like A Lady) – Aerosmith

E
Eleanor Rigby – The Beatles
End of the Innocence – Don Henley
Every Little Bit - Patty Griffin
Everybody Hurts- REM
Every Breath You Take – The Police
Eye of the Hurricane - David Wilcox
Eye of the Tiger – Survivor

F
Fast Car - Tracy Chapman
Father and Son - Cat Stevens
February – Dar Williams
Feelin’ Groovy - Simon & Garfunkel
Fields Of Gold - Sting
Flake – Jack Johnson
Flintstones – TV Theme
Follow That Road - Anne Hills
Folsom Prison Blues – Johnny Cash
For Emily, Wherever I May Find Her - Simon and Garfunkel
For my Lover -Tracy Chapman
The Fox – Nickel Creek
Fragile    - Sting
Free Fallin' - Tom Petty

G
Get Right With God – Lucinda Williams
Ghostbusters – Ray Parker Jr
Ghost of a Dog – Edie Brickell & The New Bohemians
Gimme Some Lovin’ – Spencer Davis Group
Give me One Reason - Tracy Chapman
Glory Bound – Martin Sexton
Goin’ Down Judah – Dana Cooper
Good Morning Coffee - Greg Brown
Goodnight Saigon  - Billy Joel
Good Thing – Patty Larkin
Graceland - Paul Simon
Great Day in the Morning – Dana Cooper
Grizzly Bear – Bill Morrissey
Gypsy Woman – Martin Sexton

H
Happy Days – TV Theme
Hard to Handle – Otis Redding
He Said, She Said - Loudon Wainwright III
Hearts and Bones - Paul Simon
Here Comes the Rain Again  - The Eurythmics
Homeward Bound - Simon & Garfunkel
Honesty – Billy Joel
Honky Tonk Women – The Rolling Stones
Horse with No Name - America
Hotel California  - The Eagles
Hound Dog - Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller
Houses in the Fields  -  John Gorka

I
I Can See Clearly Now – Johnny Nash
I Love Rock ‘N’ Roll – Joan Jett
Imagine – John Lennon
I’m On Fire – Bruce Springsteen
In The Living Years – Mike & the Mechanics
In Your Eyes – Peter Gabriel
I Shot the Sheriff – Bob Marley and the Wailers
Istanbul (Not Constantinople) – They Might Be Giants
I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For - U2
I Told Him That My Dog Wouldn't Run - Patty Larkin
I Walk the Line – Johnny & June Carter Cash
I Wanna Be Sedated  - Ramones
I Want To Hold Your Hand – The Beatles
I Will Survive – Gloria Gaynor
If I Had Known - Greg Brown
Iko Iko
I'm a Lumberjack - Monty Python
I'm Gonna Be (500 Miles) - The Proclaimers
In the Air Tonight - Phil Collins
Iowa (Traveling III) - Dar Williams
It's the End of the World As We Know It - REM

J
Jack and Diane - John Mellencamp
Jet Plane – John Denver
Johnny Rottentail – Amy Ray
The Joker – Steve Miller Band

K
Kathy's Song - Simon and Garfunkel
Keep the Customer Satisfied – Simon & Garfunkel
The Kid – Buddy Mondlock

L
Landslide – Fleetwood Mac
Late in the Evening – Paul Simon
Layla – Eric Clapton
Leave it Like it Is - David Wilcox
Lemon Tree – Peter, Paul & Mary
Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off – Gershwin
Life by the Drop - Stevie Ray Vaughan
Life in a Northern Town  - Dream Academy
Lightning Crashes – Live
Live Free or Die – Bill Morrissey
Logical Song - Supertramp
Long Ride Home - Patty Griffin
Losing My Religion  - REM
Love Keep Us Together – Martin Sexton
Love Shack – B-52’s
Lovesong – The Cure
Luka - Suzanne Vega

M
Makin' Whoopee – Ray Charles
Marlene on the Wall – Suzanne Vega
Me and Julio Down by the Schoolyard - Paul Simon
Meanies – Jim Infantino
Mercedes Benz – Janis Joplin
Message in a Bottle - The Police
Metal Drums – Patty Larkin
The Mickey Mouse Club March – TV Theme
Money for Nothing - Dire Straits
Moon Over Bourbon Street - Sting
Moondance - Van Morrison
Moonshadow - Cat Stevens
Moses – Patty Griffin
Movin' Out - Billy Joel
Movin' Right Along - The Muppet Movie
Muppet Show Theme Song
My Wife Thinks You’re Dead – Junior Brown

N
Need You Tonight – INXS
New York State of Mind - Billy Joel
No Man's Land - Billy Joel
No One Is To Blame – Howard Jones
Not a Pretty Girl – Ani diFranco

O
Ocean -  Dar Williams
Ode to Billie Joe – Bobby Gentry
Old Time Rock ‘n’ Roll – Bob Seger
One of Us – Joan Osborne
Only the Good Die Young - Billy Joel
Orinoco Flow – Enya

P
Peggy-O – Traditional
Perfectly Good Guitar – John Hiatt
Poet Game - Greg Brown
Pretty Vegas – INXS
Pride and Joy - Stevie Ray Vaughan
Prince of Darkness - Indigo Girls
Puttin’ on the Ritz – Irving Berlin
The Rainbow Connection – The Muppets
Ready for the Storm – Dougie McLean
Reasons Why – Nickel Creek
The Remedy – Jason Mraz
Richard Cory - Paul Simon
The Road Goes On Forever – Robert Earl Keen
Robert Johnson - Bill Morrissey
Rock This Town - Stray Cats
Romeo and Juliet - Dire Straits
Rosanna – Toto
Roxanne – The Police
Runnin' Down a Dream - Tom Petty
Rusty Old American Dream - David Wilcox

S
Sad Lisa – Cat Stevens
Saga Begins  - "Weird Al" Yankovic
St. Judy’s Comet – Paul Simon
Santa Ana Winds – Survivor
Scarborough Fair - Simon and Garfunkel
Scenes from an Italian Restaurant – Billy Joel
Scream – Todd McKimmey
Sensitive New Age Guys – Christine Lavin
Shame on You  - Indigo Girls
She’s No Lady – Lyle Lovett
She’s Your Baby Now – Bill Morrissey
Shotgun Down the Avalanche – Shawn Colvin
Should I Stay or Should I Go - The Clash
Shy – Ani diFranco
Sing – Sesame Street
Sledgehammer – Peter Gabriel
Slip Slidin' Away - Paul Simon
Smells Like Teen Spirit - Nirvana
So Far Away  - Dire Straits
Solsbury Hill - Peter Gabriel
Something to Talk About - Bonnie Raitt
Somewhere Over the Rainbow – Judy Garland
Song for a Deck Hand’s Daughter – James McMurtry
Son of a Preacher Man – Dusty Springfield
Space Oddity – David Bowie
Spider-Man – TV Theme
Stand – REM
Stand By Me – Ben E. King
Stayin’ Alive – The Bee Gees
Still Crazy After All These Years - Paul Simon
Strange Fire - Indigo Girls
Stray Cat Strut – The Stray Cats
Strings of Wings – Karen Goldberg
Strong Chemistry - David Wilcox
Sultans of Swing  - Dire Straits
Summer, Highland Falls – Billy Joel
Summer Moved On - a-ha
Summer of ’69 – Bryan Adams
Summertime – George Gershwin
Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This) - The Eurythmics
Sweet Home Alabama – Lynyrd Skynyrd

T
Take Me Home – Phil Collins
Take On Me - A-ha
Talkin’ at the Texaco – James McMurtry
Talkin' Bout A Revolution – Tracy Chapman
Talkin’ Seattle Grunge Rock Blues – Todd Snider
Tangled Up in Blue  - Bob Dylan
Tears in Heaven – Eric Clapton
Tempted – Squeeze
That’s All – Genesis
That’s My Toy – Steve Fisher
That’s Right (You’re Not From Texas) – Lyle Lovett
These Boots Are Made For Walkin’ – Nancy Sinatra
These Cold Fingers – Bill Morrissey
The Way It Is  - Bruce Hornsby and the Range
The Whole Of The Moon – The Waterboys
Thirteen Step Boogie – Martin Sexton
Thriller - Michael Jackson
Time Bomb – Reckless Kelly
Time After Time – Cyndi Lauper
Tom's Diner - Suzanne Vega
Too Long in the Wasteland – James McMurtry
Total Eclipse of the Heart – Bonnie Tyler
Train in the Distance – Paul Simon
Trees – Marty Casey
Twist and Shout – Isley Brothers
Two Princes – Spin Doctors

U
Unknown Legend – Neil Young
Up Until Then - John Gorka

V
Velvet – a-ha
Veronica - Elvis Costello

W
Waiting for the Rain – Bill Morrissey
Wake Up Little Susie – Everly Brothers
Walk of Life  - Dire Straits
Walking in Memphis - Marc Cohn
Waltzing With Bears – Dr. Seuss
Washington Work Song - disappear fear
Way Over Yonder in the Minor Key - Woody Guthrie/Billy Bragg
We Can’t Dance – Genesis
We Didn't Start the Fire - Billy Joel
Welcome Me - Indigo Girls
What a Wonderful World – Louis Armstrong
What I Am – Edie Brickell & The New Bohemians
What I Like About You – The Romantics
What’s Up? – 4 Non Blondes
When Fall Comes to New England  - Cheryl Wheeler
When I Was a Boy - Dar Williams
When Love Comes To Town – U2
When You Love Somebody and They Dick You Around, Doesn't That Really Suck - David Wilcox
Where Have All the Flowers Gone - Pete Seeger
Where the Streets Have No Name - U2
Whip It – Devo
Who Will Save Your Soul? – Jewel
Who Woulda Thunk It? - Greg Brown
Why Aye Man – Mark Knopfler
Wicked Game    - Chris Isaak
Wild Abandon – Damion Schubert
Wild Night – Van Morrison
Wild World - Cat Stevens
With or Without You - U2
The World Ain’t Slowing Down – Ellis Paul
World Falls - Indigo Girls
Wrapped Around Your Finger – The Police

X

Y
YMCA – The Village People
Yoda  - "Weird Al" Yankovic
You Can Call Me Al - Paul Simon
You Can Sleep While I Drive - Melissa Etheridge
You Can't Always Get What You Want - The Rolling Stones
You Never Get What You Want – Patty Griffin
You’re the One That I Want – Grease
You Shook Me All Night Long – AC/DC

Z
Ziggy Stardust – David Bowie



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2007, 07:45:00 AM
That's a good idea I should lift since I've been jotting tunes in a notebook anyway. I've got a dozen or two songs listed, mostly for lyrics, though I can't sing and play simultaneously on all but a couple (Hootchie Cootchie Man, Mannish Boy, Kind Hearted Woman Blues (ala Thorogood)). I also know the bulk of a couple more tunes without the fake book, Since I've Been Loving You by Zep is my favorite, though song form and I share an uneasy truce. Me likee jammy.

Dickey Betts was on HDNet again, his gig at the R&R hall of fame. I love jamming along with that show as it really stretches my major key jamming and I improve with every show. Then he kicks in Liz Reed in the middle of the set and I just crush it and cry at my crappy major key skills (Liz Reed being a minor key song with extended jams).

+2 SkyPts for Life By The Drop. Should sub Simple Man for Sweet Home Alabama imo. Also, you should learn Melissa by the Allmans (in my fakebook!), good, simple acoustic jam. Lots of good tunes on the list, though!

Hmm. I'm actually inspired. Thanks, Raph.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on July 02, 2007, 08:25:52 AM
You need to make fakebook entries for:

Queen Jane Approximately - Bob Dylan

Radio Radio - Elvis Costello and The Attractions

X-Ray - The Kinks


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 02, 2007, 09:32:29 AM
I can't drop Sweet Home Alabama, it's exactly the sort of tune that everyone knows and wants in the fakebook. Heck, I should add Freebird. :P

Righ, none of those three are ones I know really.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2007, 12:13:09 PM
How about Uneasy Rider by Charlie Daniels?  :-D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on July 02, 2007, 11:31:35 PM
Righ, none of those three are ones I know really.

Okay, how about:

Question - Moody Blues (cool Cdim, G7sus, C)

Red House - everybody, not least Hendrix

Xanadu - Olivia Newton John

Okay, I'm just trying to complete your alphabet. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 03, 2007, 06:35:05 AM
Nix on Red House. Decent enough song, but the blues catalog has SO many better tunes, especially for campfirey applications. Go for something pre-war and funny like I'm a Doctor for Women by Champion Jack Dupree or Brown Skin Shuffle by Big Bill Broonzy.

You could also go for Guster's X-Ray Eyes to flesh out X. And add Airport song while you're adding Guster, that's a cool acoustic tune.

This is fun. I forgot to jot down the contents of my nascent fakebook. Inspiration...it comes and goes for me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 03, 2007, 10:53:07 AM
Hmm. So, I imagine that for you guys some of these tunes fill the same role as the Ellis Paul and Greg Brown tunes do for me. But I barely get to slip those in when doing the jam sessions, and I don't really expect otherwise -- because nobody knows them. :)

The popular songs are the ones people know from their teen years, basically. :) Among the Cub Scouts, the little kids all want Weird Al "Saga Begins" and (boggle) "Black Horse and the Cherry Tree." The older parents want Simon & Garfunkel. The younger parents want Talking Heads and Police, unless they are sensitive or liberal types, in which case they also want Simon & Garfunkel. (In general, actually, most everyone wants Simon & Garfunkel or Paul Simon -- talk about cross-generational appeal...)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 03, 2007, 11:37:51 AM
Hmm. So, I imagine that for you guys some of these tunes fill the same role as the Ellis Paul and Greg Brown tunes do for me. But I barely get to slip those in when doing the jam sessions, and I don't really expect otherwise -- because nobody knows them. :)

The popular songs are the ones people know from their teen years, basically. :) Among the Cub Scouts, the little kids all want Weird Al "Saga Begins" and (boggle) "Black Horse and the Cherry Tree." The older parents want Simon & Garfunkel. The younger parents want Talking Heads and Police, unless they are sensitive or lebal types, in which case they also want Simon & Garfunkel. (In general, actually, most everyone wants Simon & Garfunkel or Paul Simon -- talk about cross-generational appeal...)

I think it's a matter of having different lists for different purposes.  I have a set of songs I play for myself (depending on mood and lesson goal) and song lists tailored for my audience.  I don't play out as much as I used to, but have played a large variety of gigs.  If I'm playing a coffee house, I have different solo sets than if I play with a friend for example.  I'll also play very different tunes at a bar gig than I would at a wedding... though I'm sure this is all common sense. 

I like your list though.  It shows a great deal of variety for both you and your audience. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 03, 2007, 11:57:26 AM
Yeah, sorry. I'm an artist, not a DJ :P In fact, that's what really pissed off the DJ I used to work with, he thought I was so good at it but in the end I couldn't just sit and play music I was so tired of just because someone else loves it. And the metric we always used was to gauge the age of the audience and play stuff from their high school years. Works every time. Maybe not surprisingly, it doesn't work real well for me...

I have made some compromises because I'm building a basic set to play at the blues open mics, but even those are songs I dig anyway. I'd rather play other stuff, but you have to start on the standards and work your way out from their as you get to know some of the guys. It's kind of a rite of passage, if you can rock Hootchie Cootchie Man, you're in. I do think I have a workaround with Early In The Morning by Junior Wells because a newer band likes to play that one.

If I could play and sing simultaneously, all bets would be off. Bringing the metal grit and volume to blues is friggin' awesome, especially when all but a couple of the other singers have that generic white guy blues voice.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 03, 2007, 01:04:44 PM
Yeah, sorry. I'm an artist, not a DJ :P

It's always been a fine line for me, even when I was signed as a recording artist and songwriter.  I look at it like this: If it's my stuff or something that I've personally re-invented, then I'm an artist.  The rest of the time, I'm being paid to entertain and I do my best to deliver.  I don't think I've been an "artist" in public for a long time... I'm mostly still playing just to entertain and have a little fun. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 03, 2007, 08:04:47 PM
Nebu, I see an acoustic in your iconavatar thingie over there. Since I don't recall what all has been said in this eon-spanning thread... what do you primarily play? And if you were signed, is any of it still out there lurking?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 04, 2007, 12:03:42 AM
Raph,

I was a musician for 7 years in the early 80's during a VERY active music period in Minneapolis (The Suburbs, Prince, Morris Day and the Time, The Jets, and later Soul Asylum and Husker Du (aka Bob Mould)).  I played with a number of moderately successful bands. To be completely honest, I never considered myself particularly talented as a musician.  I think my greatest skill was in surrounding myself with talent.  Between that and knowing many of the right people (I had been doing guitar repair work in a local guitar store since the age of 12), I got a lot of mileage in the business.  I'll see if I can dig up a few old demo tracks, but the music is painfully dated.

As for the avatar, you should see that the acoustic is actually a bass... it's a pic of Stanley Clarke.  As you may guess, I'm a bass player by trade but actually was a brass player when I studied music in college.  I can play the guitar well enough to get by, but I consider myself too much of a hack to ever call myself a guitarist. 

Edited for late night rambling-ness.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 09, 2007, 06:49:08 AM
You guys should be getting used to my extremely long decision-making cycles on musical stuff :) I've been bringing the acoustic into work the last week and a half to test the theory that I'll get in more playing time every day, and it's averaged about a half-hour more, and most of that concise study. Right now it's the Berklee Press Guitar 1 (http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Method-Guitar-DVD-ROM-Berklee/dp/0876390696/) book (and snagging that link...it now ships with a DVD...might have to rebuy and donate my old copy to the library!). My theory is still way too rusty and my reading, too. And sight-reading is pretty much non-existent. I love working on stuff like this because my playing is really starting to open up (FINALLY) a little bit more. Some day I'll consider myself good on guitar ;)

Aaaanyway. The theory I'm testing about an office guitar (also for travel, renfaire, bbqs, etc) is in contemplation of getting a Baby Taylor. Heading out tonight to get one, hopefully they still have a mahogany in stock. New guitar, woohoo!

Continuing the fakebook thread, I'm still inspired to formalize mine, but didn't get to it over the weekend. Sunday I just jammed and played Gothic, Saturday was RenFaire day to watch Cantiga featuring the mighty Charry Garcia (for Charango, not Jerry) from South America on charango. The man is phenomenal, his precise machinegun strumming (fingers only, of course!) always amazes me. When he sees me coming he grins and really starts hamming it up because he knows I dig it. They also have a new guy playing some form of viola, which was really cool. Charry kept goading him to play faster and he did a few times, but he seemed uncomfortable showing off. I told him they should really go for it and get jammy, but the two bandleaders (the harpist and flutist) frown on too much showmanship :( So I went home that night and jammed renfaire tunes, I have a book the band published.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on July 09, 2007, 01:23:43 PM
I apologize in advance for the n00biness of this post, as it seems there a lot of people who know what they're doing in this thread.

Thanks, in large part to this thread (and GH  :lol:) I decided to pick up the geetar as I've wanted to learn for a long time.  Went yesterday to a music shop and picked up an  Epiphone Special II Les Paul  (http://www.guitarcenter.com/shop/product/buy_epiphone_les_paul_special_ii_electric_guitar?full_sku=100161340). The vintage sunburst in the middle.
It's cheap, I'm learning, and the reviews were good, so i bought it. My father in law has a great Peavey amp, so I just bought a tuner, bag, new strings, and some picks (did I miss anything?)

I'd like to start taking lessons, and I found this site that looks pretty solid for beginners: Guitarnoise (http://Guitarnoise)

Anyway, thanks to all for this thread, I'm excited to get started.

Trot


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on July 09, 2007, 02:21:24 PM
Hmm. So, I imagine that for you guys some of these tunes fill the same role as the Ellis Paul and Greg Brown tunes do for me. But I barely get to slip those in when doing the jam sessions, and I don't really expect otherwise -- because nobody knows them. :)

The popular songs are the ones people know from their teen years, basically. :) Among the Cub Scouts, the little kids all want Weird Al "Saga Begins" and (boggle) "Black Horse and the Cherry Tree." The older parents want Simon & Garfunkel. The younger parents want Talking Heads and Police, unless they are sensitive or liberal types, in which case they also want Simon & Garfunkel. (In general, actually, most everyone wants Simon & Garfunkel or Paul Simon -- talk about cross-generational appeal...)

Because we don't want to.   :-D

I'd love to hear a recording of that one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: RhyssaFireheart on July 09, 2007, 10:11:35 PM
This thread, while going completely over my head, is interesting as hell.

That's why I thought of it when I saw an icon on LJ that said "I broke my G string yesterday while finger A minor."  Sorry, I know it's bad.

No, I didn't save the icon, just wrote the the saying down.  I wish I had the time to learn guitar, but my time management skills suck as it is, and trying to keep up with my art/writing is enough of a challenge without adding something else to the mix.

/lurkon



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 10, 2007, 12:17:20 AM
Aaaanyway. The theory I'm testing about an office guitar (also for travel, renfaire, bbqs, etc) is in contemplation of getting a Baby Taylor. Heading out tonight to get one, hopefully they still have a mahogany in stock. New guitar, woohoo!

Let me know how you like it -- I still love mine. Just remember -- treat her lightly, only put light strings and strum gentle, there's no pickguard. Did I ever tell the story of how the back on mine got INVERTED on a plane flight, by a clueless attendant jamming it into a bin? Also remember, she sounds tinny from behind the soundhole, but better to the listener.

Quote
Continuing the fakebook thread, I'm still inspired to formalize mine, but didn't get to it over the weekend.

We had a party at my place on the 4th. Plugged in amps, electrics, plus acoustic and even keyboards for a while. Based on that, the fakebook gained "Knockin' on Heaven's Door," "Black Magic Woman," "Smooth" ... the other guitar player likes Santana and rock, as you can see. He only knew the Hendrix "Watchtower," had never heard the Dylan one. And he knew "Knockin'" via GnR. So I also threw in there "Paradise City" "Welcome to the Jungle" -- huh, a straight swamp blues pretty much, who'da thunk? Sounds... different... on an acoustic -- and "Seet Child O' Mine" which of course works perfectly on acoustic.
[/quote]


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 10, 2007, 12:18:26 AM
I apologize in advance for the n00biness of this post, as it seems there a lot of people who know what they're doing in this thread.

Thanks, in large part to this thread (and GH  :lol:) I decided to pick up the geetar as I've wanted to learn for a long time.  Went yesterday to a music shop and picked up an  Epiphone Special II Les Paul  (http://www.guitarcenter.com/shop/product/buy_epiphone_les_paul_special_ii_electric_guitar?full_sku=100161340). The vintage sunburst in the middle.
It's cheap, I'm learning, and the reviews were good, so i bought it. My father in law has a great Peavey amp, so I just bought a tuner, bag, new strings, and some picks (did I miss anything?)

I'd like to start taking lessons, and I found this site that looks pretty solid for beginners: Guitarnoise (http://Guitarnoise)

Anyway, thanks to all for this thread, I'm excited to get started.

Trot

Welcome to the dark side. Your fingers will hurt. Work up to the calluses. Or just play for two hours a day obsessively, that will push thru the pain. :)

Never took lessons, so I can't speak to that...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 10, 2007, 12:19:19 AM
Hmm. So, I imagine that for you guys some of these tunes fill the same role as the Ellis Paul and Greg Brown tunes do for me. But I barely get to slip those in when doing the jam sessions, and I don't really expect otherwise -- because nobody knows them. :)

The popular songs are the ones people know from their teen years, basically. :) Among the Cub Scouts, the little kids all want Weird Al "Saga Begins" and (boggle) "Black Horse and the Cherry Tree." The older parents want Simon & Garfunkel. The younger parents want Talking Heads and Police, unless they are sensitive or liberal types, in which case they also want Simon & Garfunkel. (In general, actually, most everyone wants Simon & Garfunkel or Paul Simon -- talk about cross-generational appeal...)

Because we don't want to.   :-D

I'd love to hear a recording of that one.

Either you are quoting Greg Brown's "Who Woulda Thunk It" or I don't know which song you are referring to.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2007, 07:53:49 AM
Woohoo! Conversation in the guitar thread always makes me happy.

Trotsky: Woohoo! Good for you. I highly encourage everyone to pick up a musical instrument, it makes life richer. You get to stretch out creativity and also lizard brain stuff, plus some math thrown in. That Epi is way better than the guitar I started with, also way better than the guitar I re-started with a few years back (which I still use for slide, I set the action way high). Look back over the thread, I've made a few book recommendations. My first theory book (from high school) was this one (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882842250). I recommend Fretboard Logic (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-SE-Reasoning-Arpeggios/dp/0962477060), I wish someone had turned me onto that twenty years ago! I still struggle with theory and fretboard knowledge. There's also a box set (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-Volumes-Videos-Combined/dp/1893884058) I wish I had known about before I bought I & II.

The main thing is to also take some time to play along with recordings you enjoy. Try to pick out what they're doing, spend time really critically listening and picking things apart. As long as you're playing music you enjoy, you'll have fun.

Rhyssa: Woohoo, lurker! At least you have a creative outlet in life, that's great. Music is wonderful, but I also had to make that decision when I was in high school (I was an art/science major who wanted to be DaVinci). I chose music because I sucked at art. Little did I know that apparently doesn't matter so much :|

Raph: Woohoo pt nauseum. Got a mahogany Baby, it's great. A lot louder than I expected, and I definitely have to change up my style so I won't break it. I still think I will at some point, it really makes me aware of how hard I play and how much I lean into the guitar. But it's cool. Got it for less than the going internet price, which was also nice. Of course, been shopping at the local store for decades, soo....The recording guy there didn't know where to find someone to do a transfer of my 1/2" 8-track master from 91. Bah. I believe you have mentioned your Baby inversion, probably a year ago when I was first considering one.

Black Magic Woman. Bah, Santana. I HIGHLY recommend this Fleetwood Mac (http://www.amazon.com/Live-Boston-Vol-Fleetwood-Mac/dp/B000007P3N) album. Peter Green wrote Black Magic Woman and it's a great version without the Oyo Como Va crap :P I like Santana, but he's no Peter Green. That album is in my top ten live albums, which is saying something since I have a LOT of live albums (I prefer live albums over studio). I was also surprised to find they wrote 'Green Manalishi', which I know via an early 80s Judas Priest album (British Steel, iirc). I was into early Priest, Sad Wings of Destiny was a great album. Anyway. Forget Rhiannon, THIS album is the real Mac ;) They were originally playing with John Mayall, so there's yer blues.

I know 'Knockin' via a local bar band. I still dislike that song because they played an extended version every night when I was a teenager. At one local open mic (which I haven't been to in ages, we mostly go to the blues jam now) there is a kid who plays 'Watchtower' every week...the Dave Matthews version, sung like Dave, he acts like Dave with the little foot twisty thing...it's annoying imo. "Jungle" as a slow swamp blues sounds like a great idea! *yoink*


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on July 11, 2007, 10:21:01 AM
Raph: My fingers are already sore as hell.  Two days of learning chords and twisting my fingers into pretzels. I can already tell this is an addiction, all I've done since I got the damn thing is think about what I'm going to work on when I get home. 

Sky: Thanks for the recommendations!  I think I'll order the Fretboard Logic set at some point.  What's your opinion on tab vs. reading music? I see people in other forums go back and forth on it all the time.  But I've seen musicians in interviews talk about never learning to read music in their life.  Just wondering what the value of learning to read music is for a casual player like me, who will probably never make it pro, sadly  :roll:. (Apologies if you covered this earlier in the thread, haven't quite made it through all 15 pages yet.)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on July 11, 2007, 10:32:32 AM

Because we don't want to.   :-D

I'd love to hear a recording of that one.

Either you are quoting Greg Brown's "Who Woulda Thunk It" or I don't know which song you are referring to.

Yes I am and you did.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2007, 11:16:58 AM
Sky: Thanks for the recommendations!  I think I'll order the Fretboard Logic set at some point.  What's your opinion on tab vs. reading music? I see people in other forums go back and forth on it all the time.  But I've seen musicians in interviews talk about never learning to read music in their life.  Just wondering what the value of learning to read music is for a casual player like me, who will probably never make it pro, sadly  :roll:. (Apologies if you covered this earlier in the thread, haven't quite made it through all 15 pages yet.)
Heh. I think I did bring this up a while ago, because I've struggled with traditional standard notation for decades now. I was good at theory, but applied theory, so I lost most of it. Now I'm working on it again, with the Berklee book I mentioned a few posts ago. That's also a great book. I'll probably never be able to sight-read complex stuff, but at least I want a working knowledge to pick apart things that aren't in tab.

A lot of musicians scorn tab as a crutch, and to a degree it is because they don't account for rhythymic notation well. But I was reading a book on 15th-16th century guitar (and viola) and tablature was the way music was originally laid out for those instruments. I find tab nice because it can lay out where to finger some things, but it's only as good as the transcriber, I've found a lot who have transcribed things quite wrong after watching the artist live.

So, I really don't have a good opinion on it ;) Tab is probably good if you're just fooling around, most musicians I know can't read standard notation. But if you start with tab, it'll be that much harder to pick up standard notation down the line if you want to. So...it's up to you :) You might want to check out that Berklee book at least and get a foundation in written notation, though it's not a theory book, it's meant to have an instructor but you could make do with a 'how to read music' book along side it. It also ramps up in difficulty pretty quick, I'm just repeating the first chapter over and over for now (easy to play for me, but tough to sight-read, calling out the notes as I play).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 12, 2007, 11:34:45 PM

Because we don't want to.   :-D

I'd love to hear a recording of that one.

Either you are quoting Greg Brown's "Who Woulda Thunk It" or I don't know which song you are referring to.

Yes I am and you did.

I approve most mightily.

The chording is actually really simple, mostly just D and A. He does venture into alternate tunings ("Poet Game" is in open G for example), but many of his songs are standard tuning.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 12, 2007, 11:37:11 PM
The guitar has different timbres for the same note. 5 on the low E is not the same tone as open on the A string. Hence tab lets you see the actual timbres as well as the pitch. Really well done tab (like, professionally laid out, with stems) can give as much rhythmic accuracy as standard notation can.

That said, I recommend you learn as many notations as you can. Rhythm notation (I can read two of these), standard notation, and tab. :) It just doesn't hurt to learn it. My standard notation is really really rusty now, though, I can't sight-read anymore.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 13, 2007, 07:44:24 AM
I mostly learn by ear, using any notation systems as a crutch to learn chords (I'm poor at picking out complex chords by ear) or very fast passages.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on July 13, 2007, 01:27:33 PM
Think I've played the Jackson 3 times since I bought it. Oops. It's because I'm spending hours on my acoustic, having found I can all of a sudden pick with more than just 1 finger or my thumb. Kinda clicked one day and opened up so much for me.

These two feature heavily on my playlists at the moment.

Rodrigo Y Gabriela (http://video.google.com/videosearch?um=1&tab=wv&client=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=en&q=Rodrigo%20y%20Gabriela)

They headlined one of the stages at Glastonbury this year, reminded me to look them up having heard the name before somewhere else.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 14, 2007, 11:29:11 AM
Rodrigo Y Gabriela are fantastic.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on July 18, 2007, 11:57:20 AM
So after approximately a week and half, the fingers are starting to toughen up.  They definitely don't hurt as bad, after practicing, as they did last week. I've gotten chords A, E & D down.  Now I'm working on a couple songs that only utilize those three chords. Johnny B. Goode and Walk of Life.  So far, my chord progessions suck holy ass.  I play the chord -> look at my fingers -> change chords -> play chord...repeat. So it sounds completely disjointed.  I'm trying to memorize hand positions so I can make more fluid transitions.

Anyway, it's a lot of fun. I look forward to practicing everyday, and get pissed when I can't.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 18, 2007, 01:32:45 PM
You're 3/5ths of the way to knowing all the chords. Well, the basic chord shapes anyway. C, A, G, E, D. I'm still suggesting that Fretboard Logic book I mentioned above, I wish I'd had it early on, it really puts things into context on the guitar fretboard. Once you start connecting chords, the scales follow, learn the variations and blam, fretboard mastery. Well, if blam = a significant amount of time, work and practice :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on July 18, 2007, 01:47:01 PM
Hehe.  Ahh, yes! Thanks for the reminder.  Just ordered the  Fretboard Logic box set. Amazon Prime gogogogogo!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 19, 2007, 12:16:55 AM
You silly lead players, always pushing towards that... how about developing right hand technique before tackling scales? Sheesh.

One that would force you to learn rapid switches is U2's "Desire." The whole song is D, A, E, A, E. Yes, that "thump, thump, thump, thump-thump" riff is just that.

That said, I'd seriously work on right hand. Make sure you get the habit of both upstrokes and downstrokes -- it actually took me months to get the hang of that. Learn to appreggiate. Learn how to flatpick alternating bass. Learn how to hit only some strings and not all. Figure out how to do palm muting, and how to get the different timbres from the strings based on where you strum. Learn how to play SLOWLY, to milk a note for emotion.

A cheesy tune that forces some of this stuff -- "Clementine," believe it or not. If you can do the tune's melody just strumming, you will have learned a lot -- playing the melody as you strum can only be done if you can control your right hand. The whole song is just D and A -- you should be able to pick it out on single strings, then learn how to weave it into the strumming.

D
In a canyon, in a cavern, excavating for a
A
mine, lived a miner, 49er, and his daughter Clemen
D
tine



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2007, 07:53:47 AM
Well, of course you need to work the right hand, too. I always tend to take that for granted because it's what I worked on first and it's probably my strong point, both fingerpicking and plectrum, though I still consider it pretty weak compared to an old-timer from the '20s fingerpicking a rag or early blues. Like the complex bass lines, rhythms and melody line going over the top. It's hard for me to remember the early learning stuff because I was usually hammered while playing and it was almost 24 years ago now (!!). I should really be a lot better than I am :P

Fwiw, I don't consider myself a lead player at all, though that would also be a strength of mine if you gauge it by popular music standards. I just try to play good melodic and/or rhythmic stuff without worrying about the classification much ;) I want to get more chording into my leads and I already incorporate a lot of single-note lines into my rhythyms (people say I play guitar like a bass, I say I play both like stringed instruments!)

Anyway, to add to what Raph said, make sure you not only get good strumming, focus on alternate picking and look into different plectrum styles (when you start getting into more advanced stuff like string-skipping). Learning it right the first time will save you years of unlearning bad habits. I was self-taught for the first couple years and learned some real bad habits, when I picked up the bass I started the hard way and gained some great skills much faster.

The most important thing is to put in the practice time. It takes a metric shit-ton of practice to get good, and there are no shortcuts.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on July 20, 2007, 09:31:43 AM
You silly lead players, always pushing towards that... how about developing right hand technique before tackling scales? Sheesh.

One that would force you to learn rapid switches is U2's "Desire." The whole song is D, A, E, A, E. Yes, that "thump, thump, thump, thump-thump" riff is just that.

That said, I'd seriously work on right hand. Make sure you get the habit of both upstrokes and downstrokes -- it actually took me months to get the hang of that. Learn to appreggiate. Learn how to flatpick alternating bass. Learn how to hit only some strings and not all. Figure out how to do palm muting, and how to get the different timbres from the strings based on where you strum. Learn how to play SLOWLY, to milk a note for emotion.

A cheesy tune that forces some of this stuff -- "Clementine," believe it or not. If you can do the tune's melody just strumming, you will have learned a lot -- playing the melody as you strum can only be done if you can control your right hand. The whole song is just D and A -- you should be able to pick it out on single strings, then learn how to weave it into the strumming.

D
In a canyon, in a cavern, excavating for a
A
mine, lived a miner, 49er, and his daughter Clemen
D
tine



Cool, thanks Raph.  Any other good exercises you'd recommend for the right hand?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 22, 2007, 01:19:20 AM

Cool, thanks Raph.  Any other good exercises you'd recommend for the right hand?

Well, it's deadly dull, but just plain old alternating bass exercises.

If you want to liven it up, you could try doing a blues walking bass, like what SRV uses in "Pride and Joy". You'll need the B chord to do an E blues, though, and the B and F are probably your bugaboos at this stage.

A tune that I learned a lot of right hand from was Indigo Girls, "Blood and Fire." It uses a couple of common things you will never stop using: the Dsus-D-D9 pattern and the Asus and A2 chords. And it's also just D, A, and G. It's nice for right hand because it's a somewhat delicate song that works best with varied pacing and with flat or fingerpicking with some sensitivity to it. Pay attention to dynamics.

If G is a stretch for you, you can use the "cheat G" -- don't try to fret the two low strings, only hold down the high E at the 3rd fret. Then be sure to only strum the four highest strings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 23, 2007, 07:02:48 AM
The closed A-form B chord is one I still don't like. For blues, I use the B7 that goes x21202. It looks more complex than x24442 but for me it's way easier to finger, my hand just naturally slides into it. Sliding it up one fret instead of going back to the IV chord is a nice little frill. But for basic blues, I'd just go for E 022100 (maybe adding in  the seventh as an exercise 022130), A7 x02020, and the aforementioned B7.

That also sets you up for the triads I mostly use, like x212xx, a nice sliding form based on the A-string root. Also works on the E-string root as 212xxx (which would be F#7). Taking that to the D-string root, you can get a good feel for the B-string jump because it changes to xx213x (E7) and finally the G-string-based version is xxx233 (A7).

Playing this along with a pentatonic box can get you up and running with the blues pretty quick (it's my current rut :P). But it does open up all keys to you, which is good for jamming with others (darn keyboard players and horns imo).

Think the open form G is bad, wait until you play with the closed G-form. I mostly use the closed E-form and then fragments of everything else, except maybe a closed A-form minor. I use some 9th chords for T-Bone Walker-style stuff or maybe funk like James Brown, but I don't think I use sus chords. I'm a pretty basic player. You mentioned that SRV tune, I have a tough time with it as SRV played it because of the half-beat upper register strums. Those drive me nuts.

Anyway, I don't really remember where I got my strumming practice from. I can tell you that being in a metal band gave me incredible right-hand chops. I still can't down-pick (all downs, no ups) like I used to back then, it's intense. But between alternate picking and legato (hammer-ons and pull-offs), I can live with it. Playing a tune like Metallica's Master of Puppets with all downpicking is a good primer, we used to play that almost double speed with downpicking, I still get turned on listening to the one old tape I still have.

The best advice I can give (which Raph will chime in and mock me, I'm sure :P) is to listen to the whole band. I play guitar, bass and drums, and sing a bit. But I really like to do critical listening where I'll listen to a track several times and try to figure out each instrument. The bass line will give you the solid melody or at least the rhythmic pulses, the keyboardist or horns will give you interesting lead ideas. But for me, the key is the drums. I probably should've been a drummer, I key in on them almost completely. So I'd say most of my right-hand is locked in there, I try to listen for their changes and fills and follow that. The good side effect is that if you and the drummer fuck up a change, it sounds like everyone else were the ones to screw up!

Finally, Raph mentioned palm-muting. It can't be stressed how important that is. It's a primary means of string control and is crucial to rhythym guitar. Spend some time working on that and also making sure you dampen any unwanted notes (with either hand). Also try playing your rhythyms with various levels of palm-muting, you can really get more attack by playing hard but keeping it under control by muting it simultaneously.

/ramble


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on July 25, 2007, 10:53:17 AM
You guys fucking rule.  I'm incorporating a lot of your suggested elements into my practice routine, hopefully can speed up my learning curve a bit.

I received the Fretboard Logic box set yesterday and started reading through volume I.  It seems a little over my head at this point, but I'm trying to figure it out. They go straight into barre chords and different positions, so that will take a little getttin used to, It looks very, very solid though.

Also, my father-in-law, who has played guitar since he was kid, restrung my guitar with my new strings.  Holy crap what a difference it makes.  They're the Elixir nanoweb strings, and they are incredibly light and soooooo much easier to fret. I was shocked. Thanks guys, I can't tell you how much fun I'm having, and thanks for all the advice.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 25, 2007, 11:27:01 AM
Light elixir strings are definitely a good way to start. I prefer old rusty medium/thick strings ;) Ok, maybe not actually rusty, but I basically don't change strings until they break, and I almost never break a string. I've yet to change the strings on my acoustic that's two or three years old, or on my SG. I did change the strings on my bass a few years ago, because I had to break it down for a thorough cleaning from sitting in the basement for a few years, oiled down the fretboard and it's been fine since. I also use a pretty thick pick (http://www.jimdunlop.com/index.php?page=products/pip&id=53&pmh=products/picks) (1.5mm) when I actually use a pick. Even using the 1.5mm, I wear them down like crazy and they lose the point and become rounded after six months to a year.

I like the control of the heavier picks, a holdover from playing metal and having a real tight rhythm played very hard without the flap-flap of lighter picks. Also used to break medium picks like crazy and used a bronze pick for a while. I have to always carry one on me because almost nobody uses picks that thick, so I can't really borrow someone's.

On Fretboard Logic: it gets pretty steep, pretty quick. But it's going to be great as soon as you start moving beyond the basic open positions, and everything in it is based on those open positions, just barred versions. Don't sweat it if it's over your head, just pop back in every now and again and give it a whirl. At some point the info will start to gel. I'm also really digging the Berklee book (http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Method-Guitar-DVD-ROM-Berklee/dp/0876390696/) I mentioned before, it's really starting to open some things up for me, like actually trying to pay attention to the actual notes I'm playing rather than just doing forms and patterns. That's my #1 priority right now, and trust me...it ain't easy. I set that book aside to work on some other stuff because it was overloading my poor brain, it gets steep quick. So it happens to us old-timers, as well!

Anyway, glad we could help out some. Playing an instrument is one of the very best parts of life imo. Don't give up hope, you'll always think you sound pretty bad, I've been playing over twenty years and think I mostly suck. You'll always be falling into ruts and feel like you're just playing the same old crap over and over. Stick with it and you'll always get better and have fun with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amp on July 25, 2007, 08:16:24 PM
Sky!!...ya punkass!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 25, 2007, 09:23:28 PM
I'm a big fan of old worn strings.  As long as they hold a tune, they work for me.  My ugly guitar has 10 year old strings on it and I have played it so much that I have worn nubs into the strings on all of them where the fret lines are.  That guitar is to the point where I can sit down and play it hard for a few hours and only the bottom 3 strings are out of tune (not that going out of tune all of the time is that great of a thing).

Regarding picks, I like solid picks too.  I used to play with a quarter when I was first starting out because I was too poor to buy picks (combined with the music store guys being really big dicks and me being an antisocial prick).  It was fun and it's still something I do when I am trying to make it sound a certain way.  The ridges were nifty for sliding and striking the strings, I have absolutely zero professional training so I learned to improvise when I was bored.  I hardly advocate doing that ;-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 25, 2007, 10:37:42 PM
Elixir strings rule.

My finger oils turn even those green, though, and I wear off the nanoweb coating. :P

One thing that is a subtlety you'll just have to learn is that light and medium strings play pretty differently once you get to a certain point. I play mediums on my main acoustic.

Tonally, I prefer strings that are past the jangly phase. Eventually, I do find them to go dead, but it takes like a couple of years. I only do a full restring (and thorough cleaning/fretboard oiling) maybe once a year these days.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 26, 2007, 06:55:12 AM
Sky!!...ya punkass!
Amp!!! Don't be such a stranger, mang.

Elixirs: I hate them because I destroy the coating and it's godawful. I still have an old set on my crappy guitar (the one set up for slide). I really need to change them. The bridge end are totally shredded, the coating is all over the place.

Selby, I find that newer strings are always going out of tune on me, I bend a LOT. More Buddy Guy than Albert King, but a 2-step bend will throw most new strings out of tune, even with a good stretching. Takes so long to get them broken in properly. My older strings are like rocks, I can go nuts for an hour and have them still in tune. Of course, if you have a locking nut system, most of those troubles go away, but I don't want to deface my SG with one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 26, 2007, 12:40:51 PM
I came across a neat lesson on YouTube and thought I'd share.  It's pretty fundamental theory, but it has been a nice exercise for a bassist like myself trying to learn to become a better guitar player. 

Jazz guitar - walking bass lesson. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grK43Poye1U)

Edit: sorry for the topic change mid stream.  All of this "learning to play" stuff has gotten me motivated to practice the 6 string more  8-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 26, 2007, 01:00:09 PM
Bass lines are one of my big concerns playing acoustic guitar. It's funny playing blues, because I'm getting better at the guitar parts, but I don't know a lot of the sweet patterns for stuff like the sixth scale, so my bass lines are just real rote patterns. I've actually been playing bass the last couple nights, I found an old bass instruction book from 73 with some cool blues and funk stuff in it.

My main problem is splitting the melodies, playing a bass line independent of the melody line is damned tough for me. I've been getting a little better, I can mostly do a John Lee Hooker basic thing, as long as I don't try getting too clever.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 31, 2007, 07:21:54 AM
Just saw George Thorogood. Had great seats, so I got to see a lot of his technique. It's almost ALL right hand. I was amazed, listening to his albums, how much of it was just barre slide stuff, with his right hand contributing all but a few slurs. Really inspired me to explore that style of playing (rather than a more Duane Allman-style full-on slide attack) and I feel my playing got a lot better through a very simple visualization. Worth the price of admission right there (though it was a good show!).

Combine Thorogood's almost non-moving (out of position, so when he's on the V chord, he sits at the 7th fret; I he's open, sliding down from the 3rd fret, and using the 12th for accents; etc) and Duane's more fluid moving style and I might be getting onto something here.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 31, 2007, 01:37:18 PM
Paul Simon's stuff also frequently works this way. If you do a straight guitar-only version of something like "Graceland" or "Late in the Evening" you'll find that all those complicated horn shouts or lead riffs are actually just straight picking patterns on top of barre chords.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 01, 2007, 09:05:51 AM
I tend to like books, working at a library and whatnot, also the slow pace of digestion. I love critical listening, that's where you get all the feel and timing for changes imo (if you don't regularly gig, of course). But there's much to be said for seeing great players do their thing live and copping their chops :)

I've got a few great DVDs, but seeing someone live without the cameraman screwing around with things is unbeatable. I am so lucky to have seen the incomparable Buddy Guy three times this year. Normally we get to see the Allmans once or twice a year, but we're missing them this year. But I'll see Rossington, Setzer, Gibbons, Bonamassa, still some great shows left this year.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 02, 2007, 07:52:25 AM
I was in the mood to play some bass last night. Sucks how rusty I am on it, I should really practice more on it. I used to be pretty good once. Anyway, I grabbed the camera and took a vid of anesthesia, a cliff burton solo (posting about it in wibble made me want to play it when I got home). I forgot some parts, and it's wicked sloppy, but what the heck. Not like I'm in it for the money :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm6KMVEUDt0

Playing my old ESP custom bass through a crappy Peavey Mark III head into a Dean Markley 1x15" cab loaded with an old EVMB 400W speaker. Sounds like crap, that bass has needed new pickups for ages. In a few spots you can still hear some of my killer triplet technique. Super rusty now, I used to play The Trooper by Iron Maiden several times just to warm it up before playing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 02, 2007, 09:26:42 AM
Thanks for posting the vid Sky, I really enjoyed it.  You use a nice combination of finger and thumb use on the chording.  I also didn't think the sound was bad at all.  Watching that really showed me the guitar influence and it is obvious that you've been playing your guitar a lot lately.  I hope that you're brave enough to post more stuff in the future.  I always love to watch videos like that as it gives me the chance to learn from the technique of others.  I'll have to work on something here and maybe post it as well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 02, 2007, 12:28:58 PM
Thanks! I hate how rusty it is, so it's tough for me to post things. The bane of having been really good a really long time ago and slowly working my way back into things without the benefit of the 8 hours of practice every day that got me good in the first place.

The right hand stuff is all from high school classical fingerpicked guitar class, though I've of course expanded it from there. It is what allowed me to jump over to bass in the first place imo. There's actually a lot of different techniques going on in that piece, which is why it was a practice staple for me. Two and three string arpeggios for the left hand, and the gamut for the right: alternate fingerpicking, 'chord' fingering (the thing with the thumb), drone picking, a few nail-strummed accents and my patented super triplets.

The last part is just some blues hacking, I don't know blues bass very well because I've learned all that on guitar and keep looking for the upper strings to make chord shapes :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on August 02, 2007, 03:59:37 PM
Sky --  Great vid. You sounded just fine to me!  Definitely throw a few more vids up for us n00bs who aspire to be great  :-D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on August 03, 2007, 10:41:08 AM
You're almost making me want to go out and buy a guitar, even though I suck and have not played one in 15 years.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 03, 2007, 12:07:10 PM
Ok, I don't feel bad for how shitty mine came out. I just spent twenty minutes watching some awful versions of that song on youtube :) Best one was cello, the guy's not the greatest cello player and has a tough time with some of the arpeggiated chording, but it's really cool nonetheless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOugi_inC58

Probably the best version, based on the live Cliff 'Em All version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9puftcB0g0


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on August 13, 2007, 01:02:16 PM
I was on vacation for the last week, so I brought the guitar with me.  As luck would have it, my father-in-law who is a pretty damn good guitar player, brought his as well. As a side note, it's been cool to see him pick it up again since I bought my guitar and started learning.  He's busted his out and started playing more regularly. So he's been showing chords and songs, etc.

So he showed me Whole Lotta Love, and god it has been fun to play.  It's a pretty easy song to get the hang of, until the solo, obv.  But I've got a pretty good grasp on it, and it's been fun playing along with the recording.  My repotoire now 85% of Whole Lotta Love, Horse with No Name, and a walking bass line. W00t, look out world.

A question on an interesting technique the FIL showed me.  He showed me this two-string harmonic style (that apparently a lot of metal guys use?) on the E and A strings to play songs.  I was surprised how cool it is, however I googletarded it, and couldn't find anything really associated with it. I'd like to learn some songs in this style, if i can find some.  He played a couple, including WLL. Anyway, if you know anything about this, I'd like to learn more.

OT: I also started reading The Beatles by Bob Spitz...it's FANTASTIC if you haven't read it yet.  Very long, but really in depth not only on the band, but how they all learned their chosen instruments, etc. 



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 13, 2007, 01:26:52 PM
You need to define "two string harmonic style" a little bit better. At a guess, you probably mean power chords, but it's also possible you mean dropped-D tuning.

Power chords: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_chord

Basically, it's a barre chord where you only play the 1 and the 5, leaving out the note that makes the chord major or minor. Distorted guitars often don't sound good with major or minor, but they sound very nice with fifths and fourths.

Dropped-D tuning is often used to accomplish power chords, because it makes the fingering even easier. Basically, tune your low E string down to D, and now strumming open on the three lowest strings is a D power chord.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropped_d_tuning






Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on August 13, 2007, 01:47:12 PM
Ah, ok.  So, hopefully this explains it a little better: For WLL, he would play the 3rd fret on the low E, and the 5th fret on the A, together - then move up to the 5th fret on the low E, and the 7th fret on A.  Does that make more sense?

From the wikipedias you sent, I think power chords are the correct answer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on August 13, 2007, 05:22:21 PM
Distorted guitars often don't sound good with major or minor, but they sound very nice with fifths and fourths.
So says you ;-)  I prefer anything but "power" chords just because it is too easy and I always get the feeling I've played that song before even when it is a new one...  I can definitely understand what you mean though.

I have no problem with D tuning, but it seems like every "heavy" band in the last 10 years has done that and run up and down the fret board with 1 finger all the while the guitar magazines continually spooge themselves over how "original" and "great" they are and the kids run out to emulate them.  Gee.  If only they had applied all of that talent from 1 finger into the other 4, imagine how much of a living legend they could have been!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 14, 2007, 07:16:01 AM
Har, power chords. Cheap, effective, but pretty generic and lacking in flavor. Stock in tons of songs because they're easy to play and pretty neutral-sounding, so you can stick them in songs you don't know well and not sound too bad. Stock metal riffing.

I do disagree with Raph, though, a lil bit. On one hand, you haven't lived as a guitarist until you've slammed a power chord through a full stack with tons of distortion. That's a form of sonic bliss. But you can get much more complex, I used to use all kinds of triads to make music more interesting. It's all situational, sometimes it'd fit, sometimes it'd muddy things up and you'd need to use a power chord or (when we were a two guitar band) play in harmony to define a chord.

Drop-D tuning has it's place. However, the total misuse of it over the past ten years makes me pretty much spurn it. I'm with Selby, I sat in with some metal guys when I was first getting back into playing and it's completely retarded their playing. They could play all this complex stuff...with one finger. I just downtuned the whole thing to D (standard tuning) and got compliments on how old-school I was  :roll: Playing actual chords and knowing my scales (somewhat, anyway) put me on a level far above those one-finger cases. Sad, really.

On a personal front, making more progress singing and playing. Working on some repertoire for a blues set at some point. I could probably get out and hamfist some stuff, I'm definitely making some (slow) progress, but I don't want to be 'that guy'. In the past I was always one of the better musicians in the room because I had so much time to practice and was so focused. So being anything less than really good is tough for me :) I still haven't synced up "I Can't Be Satisfied", one of my favorites. Generally I need something with a call & response style vocal/guitar, or an echoed line. Luckily, there's a ton of blues out there just like that.

Right now my main practice tunes are "Baby Please Don't Go" by Muddy, "Catfish Blues" (in whatever form, right now "Rolling Stone" by Muddy), "Long Distance Call" by Muddy. I like Muddy Waters a lot. He's played with so many great guitarists most people have never heard of. Going to stretch out into some Junior Wells stuff, been listening to a lot of the stuff he did with Buddy Guy. I'll be putting in a version of "She's Nineteen Years Old" Buddy-style. A standard for the harp players at the jam is "Early in the Morning" by Junior, so that'll go into rotation at some point. Oh yeah, also the standards "Mannish Boy" and "Hootchie Cootchie Man", though for Hootchie I'm not real happy with the hybrid version (guitar/vocal). I do a really powerful vocal on that and it really lacks when I'm splitting my attention. Might have to relegate the guitar to a solo in that one.

Anyway, making progress is a good thing. I try to get a little better every week, learn some new trick or at least jam over a couple new songs. Been playing around with ye olde T-Bone Walker chords, always a nice addition to the bag.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 14, 2007, 11:35:12 PM
Sheesh, one side comment and all you electric players jump on me...

Distorted guitars often don't sound good with major and minor because distortion by its nature cycles the tone in and out of tune. Depending on the exact distortion settings, you can get the "beating waves" going, get a nice harmony, or you can just get stuff that sounds out of tune. It depends heavily on what processing you are applying to the guitar signal. Further, because the fourth/fifth wavelength relationship is a very strong one, whereas the major and minor relationships are less so, depending on how you have your pickups balanced, it can actually be hard for an amplified and distorted signal to carry much of the major or minor if there's fourths or fifths in the mix as well -- it can get drowned out.

Simple proof test of the above is to pluck perfect fourths, fifths, major thirds, and minor thirds, on a distorted guitar while trying a variety of pedals or settings. You'll quickly hear how the tone goes sour on the thirds in many cases.

But you guys KNOW that, I am sure. Never met an electric player who didn't know it. And the best players USE it. So quit picking on me!

Me, I'm not a metal guy, so I don't care how metal has misused the dropped D. :) In the acoustic world, dropped-D is a vital technique mostly used for specific effects, and it's the gateway to stuff like double-dropped D and then DADGAD. Yes, you can do simplistic stuff with it, but it's also the underpinning of a lot of fingerstyle. There's a variety of acoustic players who like to drop further; David Wilcox for example has been known to drop to C quite a lot, and Peter Mulvey actually drops all the way to an A sometimes.

I will confess to occasionally having plugged in and distorted on a dropped D. It's absurdly easy to suddenly sound like a shredder that way. :P I mean, picture some of the acoustic riffs I have posted here before in metal style... they're often in dropped or alternate tunings, and they'd be exactly the sort of fast showoffy thing that those one-finger players find impressive...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 14, 2007, 11:46:47 PM
Distorted guitars often don't sound good with major and minor because distortion by its nature cycles the tone in and out of tune.

Using an O-scope, most distortion mearly square-waves the sound.  Changing pitch would involve changing the frequency.  Now, some distortion pedals also "color" the sound, but that is beyond distortion loved by us purists. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 15, 2007, 12:20:29 AM
Square waving is enough to cause what I am talking about. 3rds are "unstable" relationships, unlike 4th/5th/8ve. When you map the two waveforms against one another on an o-scope, as you say, they have to line up pretty closely to sound right. I'm not talking about distortion of ONE note, I'm talking about distorting the two together causing the 3rd as a whole to sound out of tune.

Er, again though, you know this. :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 15, 2007, 12:24:24 AM
Since right-hand technique came up before, here's something I posted a little while ago:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/08/the-sunday-song-variations-on-longitude/

This is flatpicked, not fingerpicked.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 15, 2007, 08:10:47 AM
I had a great teacher in jr high school who let us play with all these waveform generators. The kids who enjoyed it, she actually took the time to explain how they all worked and how real sounds reflected the basic waveforms. That also helped me a lot in science class, and understanding things in general. Waveforms are incredibly important, can't believe more kids aren't taught about them!

Raph, I'm not jumping on you. As I said, you do have to be careful how you use them, but even a diad is an awesome twist on a plain old power chord progression. I was in a gigging metal band for almost ten years, I do know wherof I speak. But then, I did a lot of chording on the bass (not 6-string), another 'taboo' because it supposedly muddied the sound. Well, again, experience differs with common knowledge. I certainly don't consider myself 'the best', but we sure abused the hell out of any sounds we could get into, and we pretty much were self-taught through our formative years.

Thirds being unstable is a beautiful thing, welcome to the blues ;) Use and abuse that unstable interval, it builds tension and resolves nicely.

Anyway, I should throw together an example. Problem is, I don't have a metal setup anymore, to really get the proper sound you need an overdriven tube stack on 11, or at least a Proco Rat pedal. Maybe I can do something with the little crappy practice setup I have. See the multiple posts in this thread about needing a new amp.

Not to put up this crappy old clip (http://youtube.com/watch?v=3iacZDoXaVQ) again, but at 1:15 I start using powerchords (by way of demonstration for trotski), though I pretty much use the 1-5-8, throwing the octave on the top. To get a really fat chord you can also barre the 5th underneath, so a D fat powerchord would be 5577xx. Also, by using the 1-5-8 habitually, you can drop the 5th from the middle of it and just do the octave for a cool sound. Start replacing single solo lines with it and you're on the road to Wes Montgomery land. Anyway, back to my crappy vid, at 1:26 I replace the C powerchord (the progression is Bm C D, I forget which mode I'm in, B mixo? B tonality with notes from the Em scale) with a C diad (C-E, 1-3) and it makes a nice flavor.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trotski on August 16, 2007, 11:09:38 AM
Thanks for the demo Sky, very cool.  I guess I was pretty ignorant as to the proliferation of power chords, there are a metric fuck ton of songs that just utilize them. (Although good for me, since you don't really need any talent to play them, and I have none, so it kinda works out.) Since i've been playing, i can definitely tell my ear has gotten better at picking out notes and chords, i listen much closer than I use to.

I'm a huge Muddy fan; I definitely love me some blues.  LZ, Muddy, Clapton, Jack White, B.B., I love all of it.  I saw John Lee Hooker in Seattle about 3 years before he died, it was amazing.  He had three little hotties help him from backstage to his chair. Once he sat down, he launched right into 'Boom Boom'. Getting to see him play was definitely an experience.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on August 16, 2007, 06:53:38 PM
Anyway, I should throw together an example. Problem is, I don't have a metal setup anymore, to really get the proper sound you need an overdriven tube stack on 11, or at least a Proco Rat pedal. Maybe I can do something with the little crappy practice setup I have. See the multiple posts in this thread about needing a new amp.
That was what I thought back when I was first learning how to play.  Then I realized that by adjusting the knobs on the guitar and how I was playing the strings helped quite a bit.  I could make it sound nasty and distorted to hell on my shitty guitar and broken $50 Fender practice amp which excited me (I still haven't found anyone who plays a similar setup, probably because no one would want to sound so shitty yet still play technically decent).  Sure, a good metal setup will really cover up flaws and shitty playing, but I like to think that a good guitarist can make even the ugliest and cheapest guitar still sound good or exciting.  It's almost too easy on my new Marshall setup honestly, and playing this thick heavy 15lb guitar is easier\more fun than my new lightweight one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 17, 2007, 06:40:28 AM
Well, I can get a decent sound from a lot of things. My specialty back in the day was playing with shitty equipment because that's all we could afford. We just bought (mostly, heh) LOTS of it. It was all about being loud, loud, loud, fast and heavy. The crappy guitar clip is recorded through one of my first post-band purchases, my peavey mark III (crap) head and a decent Dean Markley 1x15" loaded with a 400W EV full-range, using my Boss GT6 for the effects. Meh, it works, but I've never found any distortion as satisfyingly chunky as a true full stack + rat pedal.

Lately I've been playing dry into my Pignose, which can get real burpy if you're not careful, and seems to need a 60 cycle filter desperately. But I make it sound good. It really is mostly in the fingers and tone shaping at the guitar controls, another reason I love the SG.

Was just up buying a couple knick-knacks at the music store (tuner + boom stand), eyed some amps. I'd still really like the fender super reverb (http://www.fender.com/products//search.php?partno=0217600000), but 4x10 would probably be too much for the venue I'd most likely start at (blues open mic). Talking with the local guru, he's suggesting the deluxe reverb (http://www.fender.com/products//search.php?partno=0217400000) with 1x12", and it does look like a nice amp, and they have both in stock for me to mess around with.  I was also toying with the idea of the vibroverb (http://www.fender.com/products//search.php?partno=8140000000), because I've been playing through a 1x15" setup for so long, and I like the sound of it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ixxit on August 17, 2007, 10:02:52 AM
Hey all,

Fairly new here at F13, but finally took a peek outside the MMO forum and was really happy to find this thread, which at some point I will have to read in its entirety.

I started playing electric back in 1984 at 18 after taking accordian lessons since I was a kid, and played an practiced seriously up until 95 when I met the woman of my dreams, got married and had a family etc.  Ended up selling my Marshal half stack,  my guitars (Gibson Les Paul and a Squier Strat) and other guitar related gear.  Of course I regretted it, but always intended to pick it up again.

A couple of years ago, under the guise of  an impending mid life crisis, I talked to my wife about picking up some gear again (and hey I slyly told her it would be much cheaper than buying a Harley) to which she was very supportive.

At this stage of my life, I can't really justify spending thousands of dollars on gear,  but I did manage to pick up a few choice items.

At a pawn shop I picked up a Univox Les Paul copy, which was made in Japan in the '70's for are mere $150 bucks.  The picture below is not my exact guitar (the finish is different) and the original pickups were replaced with some really muddy Di Marzio pups (I think they are one of their super distortion models) that I am not really fond of and will replace them eventually.

(http://www.univox.org/pics/guitars/deluxe_sunburst.jpg)

I also got a Squier Showmaster which has a Floyd Royse on it, and Duncan pups - one humbucker and one single coil (well designed by Seymour Duncan anyway), which sound great, although the single coil is a litty noisy.  I picked this up from my local guitar shop for half price ($200.00) when they were discontinuing the model)

http://www.soundsmusical.com/popup_prod_largeImage.asp?prodID=6650


My amp is a 90's Peavey Ultra 212 which is 60 watt all tube combo, which sounds awesome and is extremely versatile and I picked up used for $500.00.  The great thing is that the tubes are self biasing, so you all you need to do is pop the new ones in.

For effects all I have  Crybaby Wah, and a Boss Super Overdrive which I use to add a touch of compression  and a little hoodoo to the signal.

Nice warm and brown sounding setup. 

As far as musical style I like play dirty blues, straight up rock,  80's and 90's metal (and hey it's fun to goof around with this NU-metal stuff), and am starting to experiment with heavy funk.

Sky I like you you mention how  technique really effects and shapes the final sound.  My amp is usually  on one gain setting for pretty much all the music I play, and basically I roll the mids up and down; higher for blues and rock, and lower for metal and thrash as well as utilizing the guitar volume.   If I want a modern  heavy chunky percussive sound, I play pysically harder, and mute with the palm.

This ties in with what Raph was saying about certain chordal tonalities and inversions sounding bad with distortion.  A lot of guitariest lay on the gain at the pedal or amp level which over compresses and completely muddies up the sound.  I use a lot inversions and partial chords  in my playing which sound great (major, minor, 7th, 9th) even with a heavy sound.

Like Sky said, I wish I had the time to noodle like I did when I was a teen. My technique was extremely developed back then.  I still manage to practice a several times a week, and with those restrictions it's hard to be disciplined to practice purely on building up pure technique. 

I spend most of my time writing (coming up with riffs and song parts)  instead of practicing multi octave 64th note runs up and down the neck, which in a way is a breath of fresh air as it allows me to concentrate on melody and  rhythm which is what music is all about (well for middle aged guitarists who don't have 8 hours a day to practice anyway  :lol:).

Luckily one of my multi-talented  (bass, guitar, killer drums) co-workers has a Cubase based  home studio. We have started getting  together bi weekly to  arrange and record.  He has been a boon to me personaly as he has the discipline (something I am lacking) to help me arrange that  ginormous riff box in my head into what I hope will be some  decent tunes. Hopefully in about a month or so we'll have a track or two that I can shoot by guys if you are interested.

Well I have babbled on too much, hope to follow and contribute more in this thread in the future.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 17, 2007, 11:24:20 AM
Ah, cool. Another guitarist in the f13 crowd. Glad to hear you got back into things, as a musician friend of mine once said "You never quit, you just set it aside while life takes over for a while." When I bought my baby taylor, it really expanded my playtime every week because I leave it in the office all week and play on the second half of my lunch hour. An extra two and a half hours a week is incredible, especially as I'm more focused when I'm at work with limited time to play. That's why my repertoire is getting better and I've been able to focus on T-Bone chording. Started messing with some of his lead work, which jazzily intertwines the mixo mode into normal pentatonic blues (though I hate modern jazz, this is more in the big band sense).

Finally starting to feel a bit more comfortable with acoustic blues, working the thumb but trying not to stress about getting it better. Basically bringing a lot more joy to my workday, every day. Glad I made that change and the baby is a superb sounding little guitar, a real joy to play.

Funny to watch people walk past my little balcony off my office and look around for where the guitarist is.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ixxit on August 17, 2007, 11:50:10 AM
Quote
When I bought my baby taylor, it really expanded my playtime every week because I leave it in the office all week and play on the second half of my lunch hour. An extra two and a half hours a week is incredible, especially as I'm more focused when I'm at work with limited time to play

You're lucky you can do that at work.  Being a night  owl affords me extra time when the wife and kids are sleeping, which I usually play video games or watch movies.  I'm so sick of MMO's at point (none currently installed) that a few extra hours have opened up for practicing, and it's quite easy to combine watching movies and playing guitar so there's quite a few more hours.

Now that I am actively writing and recording with my  friend , I have a purpose to my playing which before was sometimes just noodling for my own pleasure and a for a limited audience (friends wife and kids).  Now I have looming recording dates which kinds of kicks me in the ass to get busy.

Eventually I'd like to learn to play slide, classical  and acoustic fingerstyle but at this point of my life, considering my social and family obligations, I'm sticking with getting back in sync with what I do best, and am familiar with.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on August 19, 2007, 07:49:13 PM
Did you hear about the drummer that locked his keys in the car? It took him three hours to get his bass player out.

How do you know when a drummer is at the door? The knocking keeps getting faster.

What do you do when you answer the door? Pay him for the pizza.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 19, 2007, 08:56:12 PM
Posted another tune... even tho nobody commented on the last one. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/08/19/he-sunday-song-she-walked-acoustic-version/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on August 19, 2007, 09:07:23 PM
I broke down and ordered one. I went into the local guitar center and it was just a little un-inviting somehow.

Heard someone playing Hallelujah in SL and I think it might be the most covered song of all time...
http://myoldkyhome.blogspot.com/2006/05/hallelujah.html (http://myoldkyhome.blogspot.com/2006/05/hallelujah.html)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 20, 2007, 08:02:31 AM
I like that tune Raph. I subscribe to the theory that any good song can be done acoustically and still be great. Hell, we used to take some of our songs and throw them into different genres, like country. We used to have a practice room over a bookmaking joint (gotta love the eye-talians) and they'd knock a few bucks off our rent if we played lounge music, so we'd just play our songs in a lounge style. It was a good musical workout, and you learned what songs transcended the metal format.
Quote
Yah, I know, the bass is muddy as hell, I mixed the backing vocals a little too low, and the electric guitar part sux. But hey, it’s very much a tongue-in-cheek song anyway. Who cares? It’s supposed to sound like everyone is just hanging out jamming
Now you sound like me! I play muddy (ooh punny), messy and poorly mixed. I don't think music should be perfect, but I can't help being an apologist because people get so uptight about things.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on August 20, 2007, 08:10:08 AM
Posted another tune... even tho nobody commented on the last one. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/08/19/he-sunday-song-she-walked-acoustic-version/
Reminds me a bit of Paul Simon.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on August 20, 2007, 10:01:33 AM
Anybody watched the PBS special on Les Paul I think it's called chasing sound? Looked decent from what I caught.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 20, 2007, 10:52:08 PM
Posted another tune... even tho nobody commented on the last one. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/08/19/he-sunday-song-she-walked-acoustic-version/
Reminds me a bit of Paul Simon.


I'll take that as a compliment. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on August 20, 2007, 10:53:57 PM
Yes, though the singing needs some work :-D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 02, 2007, 12:41:29 PM
Thread's about to slip off the page, so... thought I'd mention i am doing a birthday party/jam at my place. We'll bust out of the fakebook (see prior posts). Maybe I'll record some of it. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Signe on September 02, 2007, 02:25:45 PM
Was that an invitation?  For all of us?  I hope there's refreshments!  (http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/eat.gif)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 09, 2007, 05:22:29 PM
New tune: http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/09/09/the-sunday-song-carry-the-message/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 17, 2007, 12:44:34 PM
Some good stuff with your voice in that one. You should cut loose more like that. Nice solo, too. I love the spanishy sound.

I finally started my fake book! Took some time while in VT to scratch out some pages, mostly Muddy stuff at this point. Really trying to work on singing and playing simultaneously. It's so damned tough, I get so completely wrapped up in what I'm playing I can't divide out attention to sing. But making some progress. Always making some progress, that's the key. Been playing a little bass lately, too. I sometimes forget how damned good I used to be ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 21, 2007, 08:56:36 AM
This is what I'm talkin' 'bout. http://youtube.com/watch?v=n3bp4ohqugI Bukka White just kicking it out, that's the basic bass strum I'd love to have. WIsh I hadn't left my guitar home today, I'm inspired.

Speaking of inspired, when I got home from the ZZ Top show last night I cut a quick version of Blue Jean Blues (with only one verse, heh). Got home, cracked a nice Hefeweizen and laid it down in one take, as I always do. Well, three takes, rhythym (which I don't know, I faked it), lyric (again, just one and an improv based on the improv Billy did when he forgot the words) and a lead. I've got to find the mic doohickey that connects it to a stand, I just bought a boom stand but can't put my mic on it, heh. So it's miked awfully, I just laid it on the coffee table. It gets a bit percussive on the lead, I never realized how much I pop strings when I play fingerstyle. Recorded on the Baby. I'll bounce it down to stereo and bring it in next week to upload from work.

Maybe I'll even throw down something else, I did a little sketch of Gimme Back My Wig that I'm not sure what I want to do with, maybe do it as High Heeled Sneakers instead. Maybe as a mashup in true old blues-style, just pick verses at random as they come to me. Based on a Buddy Guy 12-string part from an album he did with Junior Wells.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 15, 2007, 09:28:45 PM
/kicks to the top....

Anyway, I'm in the market for a starter guitar / amp.  Something to cut my teeth on again.  I'm partial to the traditional strat body/neck.  Nothing too loud as far as amp is concerned, as I'll mostly be playing through headphones.  Minimal effects needed at this point.  Possibly a chorus and/or overdrive pedal down the road.

If it matters:  Musical tastes run from Ozzy to Sister Hazel to Screamin' Cheetah Wheelies to Dirks Bentley to Kenny Chesney to early ACDC to Van Halen to Los Lonely Boys to...well...You name it.  Bluesy rock to metal to country.

I'd rather patronize a local musician for lessons, but my schedule and such make it a bit difficult.  Honest answer needed here:  How much could one actually learn from websites such as http://www.guitartricks.com/?  I'm guessing not much since there's noone on the other side to say "You're doing it wrong".





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2007, 10:00:29 PM
You're as good as your own desire to learn. I wouldn't worry too much about actual lessons for now. Do you know basic chords already and shit? Just get physically comfortable moving around again then. Then get the chords or tab of a song you haven't learned to refresh yourself with. After you're confident enough that you've gotten the basic chord progression down, fill it in with the more complex parts you think you couldn't learn -- testing your limits is where the real education and fun of playing starts popping up (and it's not a bad thing if you do have limits either, so don't get too frustrated).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on October 15, 2007, 10:07:10 PM
I'd rather patronize a local musician for lessons, but my schedule and such make it a bit difficult.  Honest answer needed here:  How much could one actually learn from websites such as http://www.guitartricks.com/?  I'm guessing not much since there's noone on the other side to say "You're doing it wrong".
Do you have a muscial background? I.e. did your parents make you learn an instrument as a kid? You can certainly learn how to play without taking formal lessons but it helps if you have at least some muscial training.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 16, 2007, 01:23:16 AM
I'm guessing not much since there's noone on the other side to say "You're doing it wrong".


I need to address somethin here again:

Who cares if you're doing it wrong. About the only thing that's going to be truly grating and "wrong" is when you don't have a sense of rhythm. Otherwise, fuck it. Just get a good foundation and then play with your balls. I put forth that every musician that has moved people, guitarists and otherwise, ended up doing just that. This goes for anyone from John Cage to John Coltrane to Jerry Lee Lewis to Joey Ramone. Anyone who takes it too seriously and geeks out too much ends up just churning out elevator dogshit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 16, 2007, 07:45:33 AM
I agree with Stray.  Too technical begins to sound sterile (Satriani, Malmsteen, etc). I could listen to Clapton, Page, or Gilmour for hours. 

Learn enough theory to feel comfortable with experimentation.  Then just mess with sounds, tones, and effects until you find yourself in the instrument.  Play from the heart


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 16, 2007, 08:01:10 AM
Do you know basic chords already and shit?

Yes.  Basic chords, barre chords, that sort of thing.  I vaguely remember some basic arpeggio (sp?) progressions for practice.

Do you have a muscial background? I.e. did your parents make you learn an instrument as a kid? You can certainly learn how to play without taking formal lessons but it helps if you have at least some muscial training.

Played around with a guitar for a couple years back off and on when I was about 15-19 years old.  Never very good, and my repetoire consisted of songs off the basic G, A, C, and D chords.  I've got a decent ear, nothing special. 

Goddamn, that was a long time ago....

Who cares if you're doing it wrong. About the only thing that's going to be truly grating and "wrong" is when you don't have a sense of rhythm.

*Decent* sense of rhythm.  Not great, but not awful.  Something I'll definately have to work on.



So, is there such a thing as an 'easy' guitar to play? I've got decent sized hands, fingers are a little bit on the short side (I've got big palms, shortish fingers), both a little bit mangled from more than my share of bar fights.  I can't touch my thumb to my pinky on my left hand.  I think I've broken just about every metacarple at some point, and my right wrist is beyond fucked. :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 16, 2007, 08:10:15 AM
So, is there such a thing as an 'easy' guitar to play?

My advice as a bass player that plays some guitar: 

1) Go to a larger guitar store and try a number of guitars.  The key is to find a neck that feels good to your hand.  Some like fender, some like gibson, etc.  It's about the width and the radius. 

2) Spend a little extra money and have the guitar set up by a professional.  Moderate to low action will make playing feel much easier. 

Alternatively, buying a cheap acoustic guitar has helped my electric playing a ton.  If I can bang out a riff on acoustic, it's about 1000 times easier to play on a well set up electric.  The guitar players here may have some better advice, but that's what has helped me the most as a bassist.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: CharlieMopps on October 16, 2007, 08:10:49 AM
I've been playing metal for about a decade. If you want "Low" get a baritone guitar. A 7 string just lets you downtune and keep the high E. No point unless you need it for a particular solo... in which case I'd recommend a Baritone guitar and a whammy bar pedal. Just pitch up when you need the higher octave. You are less likely to notice the pitch shift in the solo than in the rythem sections.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 16, 2007, 09:11:28 AM
By "easy to play", it depends on how you play.

The flatter the radius, the easier single note shredding becomes. The more convex the radius, the easier chords and barre chords become.

-

You'll find the flattest necks on metal-oriented guitars (like Jackson and Ibanez) or spanish/classical acoustics.

More convex fretboards are on traditional Fender and Gibson electrics, dreadnought and jumbo acoustics and the like. Fenders stand out though, as the back of the neck shape on them is thinner compared to a Gibson or an acoustic. Gibsons generally feel like baseball bats (with the exception for some of the earlier SG's). Also, most of those metalhead guitars I mentioned above follow the Fender design as far as back-of-neck feel goes. Classical guitars have a very fat feel to them however, even moreso than other acoustics -- but their fretboards are flat.

-

So that's two factors -- back of the neck shape/grip, and fretboard radius. Only you can know what you'd prefer though, but just check out 1) a Strat  2) a Les Paul  3) a Jackson 4) a Classical, and see what you like. Those four pretty much cover the variations out there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Montague on October 16, 2007, 10:24:13 AM
I'm in the same boat as Snake. I used to play when I was young (about 20 years ago) and went to the local guitar store last night and bought a cheap $200 guitar that felt good on the hands, plus a Marshall practice amp for another $100.

Took it home and began busting out power chords and the few licks I could remember. Man, technology has sure changed. Back in the day the only little amps I could get were dinky Gorillas with horrible sound that needed a Boss pedal to get any sort of sustain. That little 10-watt Marshall though kicks ass and the sound is great, had a lot of fun getting back into it. I just need to get my callouses back, my fingers are kinda raw this morning.  :rock:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 16, 2007, 10:44:36 AM
By "easy to play", it depends on how you play.

The flatter the radius, the easier single note shredding becomes. The more convex the radius, the easier chords and barre chords become.

-

You'll find the flattest necks on metal-oriented guitars (like Jackson and Ibanez) or spanish/classical acoustics.

More convex fretboards are on traditional Fender and Gibson electrics, dreadnought and jumbo acoustics and the like. Fenders stand out though, as the back of the neck shape on them is thinner compared to a Gibson or an acoustic. Gibsons generally feel like baseball bats (with the exception for some of the earlier SG's). Also, most of those metalhead guitars I mentioned above follow the Fender design as far as back-of-neck feel goes. Classical guitars have a very fat feel to them however, even moreso than other acoustics -- but their fretboards are flat.

-

So that's two factors -- back of the neck shape/grip, and fretboard radius. Only you can know what you'd prefer though, but just check out 1) a Strat  2) a Les Paul  3) a Jackson 4) a Classical, and see what you like. Those four pretty much cover the variations out there.

That's the info I was looking for.  Thanks.

It sounds like a Fender is in the middle between the two extremes?



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 16, 2007, 10:54:22 AM
Yep.

-------

ALTHOUGH it should be mentioned that there are minor variations in Fender neck contour too. Heh.

There's the V shape (mostly found on 50's and 50's remake models), which come in both hard and soft V's... Really the best for like barre work and stuff.

The U shape (found in 70's stuff), which is closest to the Gibson necks.

And the C shape (60's, and just about all modern designs).

The feel is just like the letters would suggest. Triangular, chunky and roundish, and oval respectively.


Don't mean to complicate things though! Just about any Fender you pick up will be a C, and most of them have the same radius (slight convex).


[EDIT] It's funny how I suggest not to geek out too much about theory and such, but here I am being a dork with all of this techy shit. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 16, 2007, 07:27:58 PM
Some obvious advice...

Lighter strings = easier to play. Some electric players like heavy strings for the sake of the tone. If you are just getting back into it, don't go that route.

The only big "learn wrong" thing you can do is end up with really bad hand position on your left hand. But cramps will quickly tell you if that is the case. If it feels painful to do stuff, you are probably doing it wrong (excluding fingertip blisters from lack of calluses, and stretching when you first do barres).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on October 16, 2007, 07:32:07 PM
The only big "learn wrong" thing you can do is end up with really bad hand position on your left hand. But cramps will quickly tell you if that is the case. If it feels painful to do stuff, you are probably doing it wrong (excluding fingertip blisters from lack of calluses, and stretching when you first do barres).
Given the problems with his left hand it may still hurt when he is doing it "right" so he'll probably just have to improvise some of that technique.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 16, 2007, 07:34:57 PM
Hmm, good point. May also do his hand some good, though. "Wraparound" barres may be tough (fretting the low strings with the thumb). My hands are too small to do those anyway.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on October 16, 2007, 09:13:40 PM
Totally stress going to the guitar shop and trying out different styles.  They may look similar, but so many of them play differently.  I have huge hands with ginormously long fingers (almost more suitable for a bass) and finding a guitar that fits right and feels good is not the easiest thing to do.  Quite a few of them feel too crowded for the fingers to hit individual notes easily on the higher fret positions.  If I ever lose or break my guitar it is going to be a sad sad day to try and replace it despite being a cheap piece of crap (you get attached to them after many years of playing).

And yeah, even 10 years ago it was almost impossible to buy a starter guitar package for less than $500 (the cheapest "new" guitars in my town were $595 and they sounded like ass).  Nowadays you can get a decent sounding one for practice for less than half that.  It used to be that pawn shops were the only game in town for guitars that were cheap (but often didn't work on all of the pickups, like mine) but now you can go pick up a cheap made in Mexico or Indonesia guitar that looks like the real deal and plays similarly as the $2500+ ones.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 17, 2007, 12:51:05 AM
The larger the nut width, the better it's gonna feel in bigger hands. Standard size for Fender and Gibson (or derivatives) electrics is 43mm. Most dreadnoughts, as well as many PRS and some ESP electrics are 45mm, with some classicals and 12 strings going up to 50mm.

I'm weird, I guess. I'm a tall guy with fairly big hands, but I prefer the more narrow neck on my Jazzmaster -- 41mm (my fingers are skinny though, so maybe it makes sense).

Anyways, look into PRS (if you can afford it!!).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on October 17, 2007, 01:01:20 PM
I tried going to the local guitar center.. I just couldn't relax there... Might also look at local pawn shops.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 17, 2007, 01:05:46 PM
What happened? Too many kids clanking out Green Day riffs or somethin'? Or were the floor people buggin you?


Fuck a pawn shop though. That's a big mistake. Go to a real used/boutique shop.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on October 17, 2007, 01:37:33 PM
I got my first drum set from a pawn shop.  What a mistake that was, they were from a company I've never even heard of.  TJ Percussion.

Although to be fair, the pawn shop near my school does have a Les Paul in pretty good condition.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 23, 2007, 03:44:33 PM
I should post the picture of my kit, it's quite possibly the worst pile of shit ever stacked together. Can't recall the maker. The heads are all messed up and dented, they need tuning but I don't know how and certainly wouldn't waste anyone else's time on that kit. I got a crappy medium ride but some decent sabian highhats with it. A guy that was working for me had them in storage and needed some dough for xmas, I quite generously gave him $100 for the set (nice hats and cheap kit imo).

I've since put $10 into a nice pawn-shop tama straight stand that I don't have a cymbal for. I also stomped through the cheap bass drum pedal, not surprising because I stomp the shit out of it. So I sprung for a nice chain-drive dealy, tama or something.

As soon as I get my own house (or some amazing apartment situation), I would like to get a decent kit set up in a little studio room. Something like this (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Gretsch-Drums-Catalina-Maple-Fusion-Shell-Pack-with-Free-16-Floor-Tom?sku=445670). I was going to go even more stripped down, I played with a bunch of configs back when I had the opportunity. But I was watching some old Who concert footage and I decided I should have a few toms set up. I love playing drums, with my senheisser recording cans and ipod, there's a couple hours of good loud fun. Earbuds and earphones don't cut it, need full ear cup action...and probably an ear-damaging ipod volume...I do play hard.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 23, 2007, 03:47:15 PM
Oops, forgot what I came in here to post. Setting up ye olde amazon wishlist for the xmas season's hopes...I just threw in this (http://www.amazon.com/Clayton-Movie-Replica-Pick-Destiny/dp/B000OT8PAE) and these (http://www.amazon.com/Clayton-Functional-Replica-Destiny-6-Pack/dp/B000K6B4E0/).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on October 24, 2007, 01:40:55 AM
I actually have that exact Gretsch setup in birchwood.  I prefer maple, but I got a good deal on it.  Guitar Center & Sam Ash like to give away the little tom for free.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Signe on October 24, 2007, 02:37:17 PM
Love, love, love the Pick of Destiny!  Definitely one of those in the xmas stocking for my incredibly talented guitar, bass, drum, sax, keyboard playing nephew.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on October 24, 2007, 09:29:27 PM
Yeah, wouldn't surprise me if he has the real thing.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 25, 2007, 02:35:26 PM
So when push comes to shove and you have to evacuate, and it means choosing what instruments to take, here's how it boils down:

S S Stewart banjo (1894), 62 Melody Maker, 62 L000 Gibson acoustic, Blueridge acoustic, 1950's Harmony bari uke: save.
Michael Kelly mandolin, Washburn bass, Applecreek mtn dulcimer, Shenandoah Jr amp, rest of gear: leave.

 :heartbreak:

But I am home again and everything is fine.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Signe on October 25, 2007, 05:20:22 PM
My nephew started out interested in bass but kept going and now has become very accomplished at a number of instruments.  He seems to have a knack.  A couple of years ago we got him an electric violin (just for fun) and he's had a blast with it.  I've been thinking for a while of giving him a banjo.  I don't think he's ever messed around with one but he's a huge Bela Fleck fan.

PS  I'm glad everything went okay, Raph.  Good luck!  I'm thinking the stress would have probably done me in by now.  It's hard to believe some of those fires were set intentionally.   :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 26, 2007, 09:45:55 AM
By Al Qaeda?

I have a banjo, my grandfather's cheapo Silvertone. But it's in such awful condition, I cleaned it up but it needs some setup work because the action at the 12 is about an inch  :-o I'd love to learn some basic banjo stuff, and it's close to the open tuning I use for slide guitar (open G). Of course, the Scruggs book lists many alt tunings anyway, but I thought the open G was cool as I saw Guy Davis (who is awesome btw) play Can't Be Satisfied on banjo earlier this year.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: CharlieMopps on October 28, 2007, 12:44:21 PM
Some obvious advice...

Lighter strings = easier to play. Some electric players like heavy strings for the sake of the tone. If you are just getting back into it, don't go that route.

The only big "learn wrong" thing you can do is end up with really bad hand position on your left hand. But cramps will quickly tell you if that is the case. If it feels painful to do stuff, you are probably doing it wrong (excluding fingertip blisters from lack of calluses, and stretching when you first do barres).

Having played in Death metal bands for years, I can promise you... heavier strings do not give you heavier or even different tone. I know a lot of guys as well, that think the gauge of their strings effects tone... but it doesn't.

The only thing I've found they do, is that when tuning very low (I've been know to tune to B) they lose less tension. When you have ultralight strings and you tune down to B, they are "loose" on the guitar and you have to have extremely good finger control to prevent them from swinging out of tune just from the pressure of your hand. If you ARE really good at controlling the pressure of your fingers you can use this to your advantage, look at Morbid Angel... that tone they have comes strait from very lite gauge strings on a very down tuned guitar.

My tip? Practice with medium gauge strings. Play shows with lite gauge. The medium build finger strength, then the lite will make you fly over the fretboard at the show.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 28, 2007, 01:03:45 PM
There was a time when I played with .013's or even higher. Particularly on Jags or JM's. I mainly used those guages because the bridges on those two particular guitars are literally broken by design (it's not in my head either...that's been the gripe about them for 40 years). Awesome guitars, but the absolute most retarded saddle design ever.

EXAMPLE:

(http://www.guitarpartsresource.com/JAGSADDLEKIT.jpg)


They need a lot of tension or the strings pop right out of the grooves.

This goes without mentioning all of the other little quirks (and there are many).

I finally started equipping a new saddle design though and can manage with .010's, but still prefer .011's, which is what I do on other electrics. I just can't stand the feel of anything smaller, and I'll break .009's or .008's almost immediately.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: CharlieMopps on October 28, 2007, 01:10:13 PM
Good point... I have played many guitars that would not play correctly with strings that were too lite or too heavy. My Les Paul will not take heavy gauge strings. I never pay attention to the .0013's or whatever the numbers are. I just get "Ultra lite" and leave it at that. I usually buy whatever brand comes with a free beer glass that month. Although, I won't play BlueSteel, there's something that just feels wrong with those strings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 28, 2007, 01:16:36 PM
Well, Ultra Lights are .008's or .009's.

.013's or .014's are Fucking Stupid Heavy ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on October 28, 2007, 03:33:58 PM
If you ARE really good at controlling the pressure of your fingers you can use this to your advantage, look at Morbid Angel... that tone they have comes strait from very lite gauge strings on a very down tuned guitar.
Trey is one hell of a guitar player in some of their work.  God of Emptiness is one of my favorite songs where he shines (in addition to all of their first 2 albums).

I'm a fan of 0.010 gauge strings.  Anything thinner and I feel like it's too thin for my hand to easily control and thicker I end up fighting the strings more than I care to.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 29, 2007, 12:16:23 PM
Funny this comes up. I've been playing a bit more lately, especially focusing on singing and playing simultaneously (zomgsuck). And last night I was thinking about bumping up the gauge on my SG and fiddling with the gauges on my Open G-tuned slide guitar. I'm using GHS .01s on my SG, but after playing the Baby Taylor so much recently, they feel very jangly and imprecise. I'm going to grab .11s next time and keep tweaking it. I might mix and match, keeping .01s on the high strings and going heavier on the low strings. I have a very heavy hand for palm muting and I like to have a thicker string for that, also probably a bass playing thing.

Actually I was planning out an instrument that was between guitar and bass, not like a baritone guitar but more of a true hybrid. The low strings of the guitar over the high strings of the bass, with string spacing maybe a bit tighter than a six-string bass...anyway. My brain is crapping out stuff like this constantly, my notebook is fun. On the other page from the guitarbass design is a custom parquet floor design...

Back in the band days, we used to use .09s or .08s. Our guitarist loved them, but I would've switched to heavier strings if I hadn't taken over bass duties.

Strings contribute a HUGE amount to tone, but with metal bands, it might not be as obvious because the signal has been utterly mutilated by the time it comes out the speaker :) I really like thicker strings, I feel much more in control and the sound is far less jangly (and as mentioned, you don't have the problem of sharping out by simply fretting a note!). I also use a fairly ridiculously thick pick (1.5mm), so that's a factor.

What amazes me is I never really break strings. Or change them. This thought occurred to me last night while I was playing really hard on some old Muddy Waters riffs, beating the shit out of the .01s on the SG with the slab of plastic I call a pick. I wear down the tips on the 1.5mm picks, too, eventually I have to retire them because they're too rounded off.

Practicing on an acoustic is so great for hand strength.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 29, 2007, 12:59:51 PM
Here's at least one guy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwlLaJuwEr4) who wouldn't have sounded right with little strings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 29, 2007, 06:20:07 PM
Strings absolutely do affect tone. :P Jangliness, sustain, intonation...

I use .013's on my acoustic. That's a Medium, not a Heavy. I think I have .011's on the electric and on the Baby Taylor.

Supposedly SRV used heavy strings on his electric.

Posted a new tune yesterday, btw. http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/10/28/the-sunday-song-up-near-witch-creek/



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 29, 2007, 07:03:19 PM
.013's would be medium on acoustic, yes, but electric, that's pretty bulky.

SRV used .013 to .058, similar to a lot of jazz guitarists actually -- but as we all know, he played much more maniacally than any of those guys. Supposedly, he'd play till they were downright bloody and skinned, and if the set wasn't finished, he'd apply super glue on his wounded fingertips to play some more.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 30, 2007, 09:00:20 AM
The SRV superglue thing was about his nails pulling away from the nailbeds from bending those heavier strings. That's one reason Albert King was such a monster bender, besides having the strong hands you need, he was playing upside down so his high string bends went toward the floor, saving his nailbeds a lot of torture.

I stop playing when the pain gets to be too much, but when gigging, I have played until I'm a bloody mess several times. Mostly on bass, though. And I don't really feel it until the gig is over and I realize I've bled all over everything.

I was going to post a rambly five-minute piece I did last night, but it was way too disjointed and I actually went out of key of a measure...twice! It was a cool jam, though, hopefully I can get into the zone again and record a better version. Got in the new Guitar World and they had a piece on Coheed and Cambria, with a nice chord progression, I forget exactly but something like Dm - F - Cadd9 - B5. I turned up a nice high-gain and started wailing it. I should just record /everything/ because I had a wicked version, tried to record it and couldn't quite recapture it. There was a whole section in the middle where I threw in a Dm - C reggae rhythym, it also had some nice melodic passages and some shred, some rock licks, a nice hodgepodge of stuff.

Then when I went to record it, I blew the Cadd9-B5 progression (twice!), dropped the reggae groove (which imo ruined the piece). But on the playback I was fingerpicking and then reggae strumming the Baby and it was really, really slick. But I had just re-arranged my recording setup and hadn't thought through recording the acoustic and it was waay too late last night to mess around with it (go Favre!).

Definitely the seeds of a cool song in there, though. You may have noticed the trend of me not polishing or even really finishing anything.

edit: Raph, nice piece. Poignant and a nice jam to boot. Vocals a bit out front, trying to hear more of the slidework ;) Then again, I'm the opposite, I tend to bury my vocals because I hate my voice. This verse in particular was creepy as hell:

So hush my baby girl, don’t cry but don’t you dare go sleep
And son, you’ll need to be brave and decide which toys to keep
Your momma’s got some pieces of our lives packed and no its not enough
But we’ll all stay together until the sun comes up


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 30, 2007, 05:32:26 PM
Glad you dug it. I barely mixed it, really... wasn't til I had rendered to mp3 that I realized the vocals were too foregrounded and the bass was mostly inaudible. The bass needs redone anyhow.

The slide work is... noodley at best. There's only like a five note figure and a 2 note figure there, everything else is just whatever came to mind really briefly. Mostly just wanted the atmosphere.

Open D, so if you want to mess with it, the acoustic parts are all played fretting just the three low strings mostly. I think I fingered it this way:

Verses:
222000
222000
020020
222000

little riff there sometimes is 000000 hammer on to 222000, then to 5 then back to 000000 and hammer on to 222000 again.

Chorus:
555000
555000
777000
222000

Bridge ("So hush..." verses)
000000 to 222000 midway thru the line
000000 to 222000 midway thru the line
032000 to 020000
777000 to 222000

I could put up a version w/o the slide and you could layer in your own part. :) Plus, there's a gap there for a brief solo that I kinda forgot to play.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 11, 2007, 12:00:36 PM
http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/11/11/the-sunday-song-october/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 20, 2007, 12:08:48 PM
I've been building my own speaker cabinets for years but I just don't have the time anymore.  I was wondering if you guys could recommend a solid value (bang-for-buck) in a 2x10" speaker cabinet.  I've been playing my bass a lot more lately and am looking for a tight practice enclosure.  I have been playing through a VERY old 2x15, but it's really loose on the low end, particularly at practice volumes as well as being a pain to move around.  I'm planning to head to Denver this weekend, so any input before then would be appreciated. 

Oh... I play a 70's Fender Jazz with roundwound strings through a clean Ampeg amp (like 450 watt @ 4 ohm) if that helps. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 20, 2007, 12:24:07 PM
I have the ubiquitous ampeg 8x10 cab, with one speaker gone (got it that way for $100, cover is also shot, but who cares). I wish I had your amp to drive it, I'm using a shitty (shitty shitty) Peavey MkIII head, I think it's 125W. Combine that with the crappy passive pickups on my old bass and it leaves a lot of room for improvement. I used to play through a Peavey 2x15 loaded with 400W EV full-range 15"s, but as you mention, that's better for loud thumping than practicing, and it's heavy as hell (motherfucker stole my shipping money AND cabinet...another story).

So I dunno. Maybe an ampeg 2x10 cab? Maybe a crap pawn shop 2x10 cab and buy some nice 10"s for it?

My advice after a few cross-country moves is to buy it after you move :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 20, 2007, 12:33:05 PM
So I dunno. Maybe an ampeg 2x10 cab? Maybe a crap pawn shop 2x10 cab and buy some nice 10"s for it?

Good ideas.  Ampeg makes a 4x10, but I'm not sure they make a 2x10.  The 4x10 is about $450 new which isn't bad, so that's an option.  I also found a Galien Kruger 2x10 for about $200.  I could just grab that and if the speakers suck, replace them.  Behrenger, Hartke, and SWR all scare me and I'm nto willing to shell out the cash for Eden.  Mayeb I'll have to look at a Peavey cap and re-load.  Decisions, decisions.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on November 20, 2007, 11:34:01 PM
I pulled my guitar out today and my fingers are sore as hell. 

Got it in tune and belted out some "Horse with no name" I felt pretty impressed with myself.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on November 21, 2007, 05:36:46 AM
I pulled my guitar out today and my fingers are sore as hell.
I decided to break mine out for the first time in about 2 months.  I gave myself a blister after about 2 hours.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 21, 2007, 07:07:23 AM
I'm addicted to my Baby Taylor. It's so resonant and rich. I have to force myself to pick up the SG (which I still love playing!).

It's actually a really good thing. My lead powers are slipping a bit, but I've been making decent headway into acoustic blues, one of my goals. Build the fundamentals that will make my more advanced solo stuff so much better. I stick to a few basic chords for now (E/E7 - A/A7 - B7) and work on adding multiple lines. My goal is to be able to juggle three independent lines - lead, rhythm and bass. I've even been picking up the bass to solidfy the bass portions by playing it a few times on bass to make sure it feels like a real bass line. Also working on bringing in interesting rhythmic elements.

I'm doing horrible :) but I'm making some progress, which is always a good thing! I wish I both was not a perfectionist or so resistant to doing multiple takes. I lose the feeling for a tune really quick without a band, I guess.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on November 24, 2007, 07:33:11 PM
Time for my biannual mention of my cousin's stuff:
http://myspace.com/travisaustinmusic

He got a myspace.  Seduction by A Kiss to Betray rocks pretty goddamn hard.  Needs to work on his singing, but I'll give him a break since he plays every fucking instrument in those things- keyboards, drums, guitar, and whatever the hell else he's using.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 24, 2007, 07:42:31 PM
I hope this doesn't come off shitty, cuz I like it. Not my kind of rock song really, but Seduction sounds like the score of a Castlevania boss battle or something. The boards and static-y percussion do the trick.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 24, 2007, 09:50:13 PM
I posted a non-sucky performance of the song I posted last time. :P About as far from rock as you can get, of course.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/11/23/a-better-version-of-october/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: bhodi on November 24, 2007, 10:02:42 PM
I like the new recording setup. I think it adds a warm sound to the lower notes on the guitar, giving sort of a acoustic recording quality to the piece. That is, if it wasn't your mic placement, it's your tuning, or something. Anyway, whatever it was, I liked the way it was recorded and it sounded better than your previous October. A comparison came out of lieft field randomly, of the Eric Clapton's unplugged Signe that I have. I pulled it up, and with only a slight hint of I guess you'd call it tinniness on the higher notes (maybe from that bouceback you mentioned) the recording sounds similar to my untrained ears :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 24, 2007, 10:13:01 PM
Forgot to mention the latest addition to my weirdo collection of acoustic instruments... a Venezuelan cuatro. Sent my my uncle who found it in a flea market in NYC, badly beaten up, with some cracks on the side. Still has a nice voice though. Clearly a low-end folk instrument, it has a hole in the headstock so it can be hung on a nail. He swears it's an authentic one from Venezuela based on the much faded maker's mark on the inside.

One broken gear on a tuning peg, one missing string. Plus cracks on the sides. Plus old cracks apparently repaired by smearing wood glue all over it. He paid $1. I wonder how much I will pay to have it fixed up. Sigh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 24, 2007, 10:16:03 PM
I like the new recording setup. I think it adds a warm sound to the lower notes on the guitar, giving sort of a acoustic recording quality to the piece. That is, if it wasn't your mic placement, it's your tuning, or something. Anyway, whatever it was, I liked the way it was recorded and it sounded better than your previous October. A comparison came out of lieft field randomly, of the Eric Clapton's unplugged Signe that I have. I pulled it up, and with only a slight hint of I guess you'd call it tinniness on the higher notes (maybe from that bouceback you mentioned) the recording sounds similar to my untrained ears :)

The previous October was a bit of a train wreck. I mean, not just the recording, I think the performance was a trainwreck too. This one is better, tho not great.

I would hope it has an acoustic recording quality... it basically is! There's no amplification there at all, just a little bit of reverb after the fact in the mix, along with some volume. I ended up panning the whole mix to the right a fair amount because one of the mics came in so much stronger than the other.

Some of the warmth comes from the tuning. It's in C G C G Bb C.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on November 25, 2007, 12:00:17 AM
I hope this doesn't come off shitty, cuz I like it. Not my kind of rock song really, but Seduction sounds like the score of a Castlevania boss battle or something. The boards and static-y percussion do the trick.

You're right, it does kind of sound like that.  I wouldn't take it as an insult, though- boss battle music rules.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 25, 2007, 11:25:16 AM
And yes, another.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/11/25/the-sunday-song-november/



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on December 06, 2007, 10:30:09 AM
Kinda a fun site for someone who just wants to pick up a guitar and play a song.

http://www.actiontab.com/view_actiontab.html?id=109 (http://www.actiontab.com/view_actiontab.html?id=109)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 06, 2007, 12:33:37 PM
Eeet's backwards! I guess it's good if you're used to learning stuff from watching someone else play, but it would seem to make more sense if they had the standard training POV of looking down at the fretboard from playing position. Nifty, though.

Kinda gives me GH3 flashbacks, though. I'll stick with a piece of paper :P

Not much guitar news in my neck of the woods, just doing some woodshedding in case I play next week with some friends. Opened my mouth at the last blues gig and might get called up to sit in on Thrill Is Gone. I'm irrationally nervous about it, or maybe rationally...it would be my first blues jam with anyone, and in front of an audience of the best blues musicians in the county. Everyone turns out for the December jam because it's a charity jam session. No pressure! :| Maybe stay in and comp a few 7th chords behind some other stuff and hide during solo shoutouts.

The guy I'll play with has an absolutely amazing amp, a Vero (http://www.veroamps.com/) 20th Century Ltd. He plays a Gibson semi-hollow and his tone has never quite been there, but he is now easily the reigning tone monster of the jam session. While I'm still considering a little Fender tube jobby for starters (and going shopping tomorrow...), I'm sorely tempted by the Vero. If only they weren't $$$...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 06, 2007, 05:58:35 PM
I hate to say this, but after learning more and more of your tastes, I don't think you'll be happy with a Fender in the end. It's a killer tone, don't get me wrong (and a Gibson with a Fender amp is perfect for BB stuff like Thrill is Gone), but the overdrive characteristics are not in the same area as typical rock. If you have any inclination at all to seriously crank up, then you might be disappointed. Fenders are good for lots of clean, glistening tones (and a lot of headroom to not distort) or those right on the edge, slightly overdriven leads like you'd hear from old blues cats. When you crank them up, they're really muddy, punk like, and garage-y...Especially anything of the Bassman variety (vibrolux, vibro king, hot rod, most blondes and tweeds). I'm in love with Fender stuff myself, but even I feel limited sometimes.


ANYWAYS... Have you played it with Marshalls much? You'll find plenty of blues tone out of one, and have more options for harder stuff too. I mean... Look at Cream era Clapton, Townsend, Angus, and Tony Iommi -- all roughly the same amp and guitar, but a huge difference.

[edit] Or hell, get both! Get a modeller. It certainly makes recording easier, I'll say that much. Maintaining a tube amp can be pricey and a bitch too. And they do sound pretty accurate these days, down to the feedback characteristics. I have a little trusty Valvetronix for messing around with, but the Cyber Twin is cool too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 07, 2007, 07:34:43 AM
I've got a modeler and I fuckin' hate it (Boss GT-6), too much stuff to dick around with.  I play pretty clean these days, I just want an amp that will break up nicely without deafening me. Something that will be good for cutting through the mix at a small club, which is where I'd be using it most of the time. I'm talking combos, a place I think Marshall loses something in the translation. Would I love to have a 100W Marshall stack? Hell yeah, but I'm not in my 20s anymore, I won't ever have a need for that kind of power. I've done the full stack thing, I used to play through a Laney stack when I was doing thrash metal in the 80s.

I'm just going by what I'm seeing people with killer tone playing, and it's been 95% Fender amps, no Marshalls at all (unless you consider the metal guys like Zakk). Irl and on tv. The only amp I've heard whip the shit out of a Fender has been that Vero, and that was the most amazing tone I think I've ever heard, I just can't afford one right now. We'll be over in the city with a decent guitar store today, so I'm hoping they still have my SG in stock (or at least something with the same pickups) so I can try a few things out.

If I ever do need metal crunch, I'll just route through a proco rat pedal. Those used to define my tone back in the day, monster crunch, palm-muted riffs of death.

One thing I need to learn more about is the variety of tubes and how to bias them. Guys have been saying that is important even with a good amp.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 07, 2007, 07:46:54 AM
One thing I need to learn more about is the variety of tubes and how to bias them. Guys have been saying that is important even with a good amp.

The tubes you choose can define the sound every bit as much as the amp itself.  There are some good intarweb resources for it and you'd be amazed at some of the tubes you can find on eBay.  I recently bought a set of 1950's GE tubes for a preamp that I have and they were surprisingly both available and inexpensive. 

The Tube Store has useful reviews and info on the front page. (http://thetubestore.com/)  <see the lower right corner "Answers and info">



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 07, 2007, 08:51:32 AM
Great! Thanks!  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 07, 2007, 02:53:16 PM
Sky, the GT-6 is not in the same league as a Cyber Twin or Valvetronix amp. There's a lot more electronic wizardry going in there (mainly in the emulating of powerstages... in this respect, the Vox amps are the best, because they do at least use some real tubes).



Anyways, I'm not knocking Fender amps in any way. Most of my amps have been Fenders. The last one was by far the greatest Fender amp ever made (the hand wired Vibro-King). If you can find one of those for cheap, you'd be lucky. But as far as versatility goes, that they are not. It will dictate your sound a lot... So I'm just saying. It's a sound I happen to like, but I've run across many players who couldn't get used to it.


If you want a combo that can really cut through a mix though, nothing beats a Vox AC. The key to cutting through is High-Mids -- that's pretty much the natural voicing of a guitar, where other instruments don't invade in on the sound spectrum. It's strange, since most guitar players (when by themselves), cut out the mids and boost bass and treb, but in a band situation, mids will get you heard the best. The funny thing is, Vox amps don't even have a Mid knob. Just treble and bass. The mid level is hard wired into the amp. Check one out though!

Fuck biasing and getting into the nitty gritty parts of these things. I'm no electrician. Many a professional have been shocked to death by that shit, and my amateur ass isn't going to try. The downside is, it's usually $100 bucks just to get someone to do it.

Those GE tubes are only cheap because they're preamp tubes. All preamp tubes are dirt cheap. It's starts to hurt when your amp (like that VK, for example), has 6-8 power tubes in it (among others). Especially if you're going for new old stock shit -- you could easily break $200-300 just on fucking tubes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 07, 2007, 03:09:47 PM
This is a man cutting through the mix with an AC30 (http://www.colorblue.dreamhosters.com/mp3/Psychedelic/01 Messin With The Kid (Live).mp3)  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 10, 2007, 11:51:57 AM
Dicked around with the multitrack saturday, pooped out a draft version of The Thrill is Gone.

The fiancee is always making fun of my 'usual disclaimers', but I can't help myself. Firstly, it's a draft :) Just throwing down ideas, I have another one that's more of a Hendrix vibe on guitar. Secondly, I hate my voice, I just haven't found a comfort zone. For some reason this song is exceptionally challenging for me, I'm not sure why. It's not quite spoken, not quite sung, BB has a very odd thing going imo.

That said, technically there are a few issues, I blew the change just before the first solo, then the first couple solo lines were subpar because I was distracted by that. I'm firmly an improv player, with all the negatives that go with it! Now, I know I can go back and fix that little bit, but my studio skills are so rusty I wasn't getting it right in the limited time I spent messing with it, and I totally ruled out punching in/out destructively! One of the things on my list, get better with my multitracker.

The bass line is sloppy, I threw it on as an afterthought because I was inspired by a Janis Joplin documentary and I haven't played bass in a while. As always, first take, off-the-cuff. Finally, the acoustic part is weak. I totally cramped out my thumb because I'm not used to playing big chords on the jumbo for so long. And toward the end, the song drones on Em, though that did bring out a nice quiet section where I started muting the acoustic part and then followed my own lead on the subsequent instrumentation.

Recording technique: Played the acoustic on my Alvarez jumbo while listening to the original recording of Thrill is Gone. I like starting out that way because it gives me the percussion and chord/song structure to build from. Then I laid on the vocals to flesh out the form. Third track was the lead line (forgot to switch off the lead pickup after the solo, heh). Then I threw the bass line on there. Half-hour front to back, total time spent on this.

No mixing on the track or anything, I was just using it for ideas and to bolster my confidence in my playing. I thought it almost came together and there's the bones of a good track in there, so I figured I'd share it. I really suck with finalizing songs, I'd rather just keep jamming :) Hope you enjoy it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 12, 2007, 12:22:39 PM
Arg, now I know how you feel when you put up a tune and nobody comments on it, Raph :P

Anyway, check out this link for gadget coolness:

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/iphone/proremote-pro-tools-controller-may-be-coolest-iphone-app-ever-updated-332324.php


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 12, 2007, 01:03:48 PM
Good playing man. Good luck on finding that amp too. A good tone will definitely bring out the best in that playing. With that high gain right now, you sound a bit like Santana! Not a bad thing though.

Anyways.. Forgot to look back at this thread to comment. Sorry!

The acoustic causes a bit of dissonance though, I have to say..



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 12, 2007, 01:10:54 PM
By the way, for the vocals: They're not as bad as you think, but I have this suspicion that you'd be more comfortable a half step sharp.

[edit] P.S. Don't even pay attention to BB  :-) Do your own thing, just find your range.

Like this little cat here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHoO3JHnn3Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHoO3JHnn3Q)




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 13, 2007, 10:52:00 AM
Arg, now I know how you feel when you put up a tune and nobody comments on it, Raph :P

Heh... and I didn't even see it until today! Will grab it and take a listen and offer comments.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 13, 2007, 01:46:37 PM
The bass line is sloppy, I threw it on as an afterthought because I was inspired by a Janis Joplin documentary and I haven't played bass in a while.

I'd say that it was a bit too busy for the song.  You're obviously a talented bass player, but sometimes less is more (aka Duck Dunn). 

Overall, I really enjoyed your guitar playing and wish it had been a bit more highlighted.  I also think that your singing is better than you think.  You have a unique voice that suits the style well.  Were I to have mixed the track, I would have a) given the guitar a tad more depth b) replaced the acoustic with a backbeat strumed clean electric (would sound great on a compressed ES 335 with some reverb and a little tremolo) c) kept the bass line fat and simple and d) added a little delay to the vocal. 

It's very brave of you to put stuff like this out into the internet void and I'm glad you did.  You're a talented musician and it's clear where your strengths are. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 13, 2007, 02:22:27 PM
I like the electric part quite a lot. Hate the tone on the acoustic. Noisy AND rubberbandy. :) Replace it! I agree the bass is a bit too busy, but you're a good bass player. I think a bit of effects in the mix would make a big difference on the vocal. I also think you're trying a bit too hard on it in a few places, pushing it too much.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 13, 2007, 03:16:52 PM
Hehe Raph finally gets to be a critic  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on December 13, 2007, 08:29:31 PM
30 seconds later I'm still laughing at that comment...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on December 14, 2007, 12:04:29 AM
I expect anything he'd describe as having been pooped out is probably going to need some cleaning up.  For what it's worth, I enjoyed it.  More people should post some work and expose themselves to ridicule.  As such, I played the drums on this little number (http://www.maffamatix.com/Media/Spaceheater%20-%20Subway.MP3).

And for the sake of humor, I composed this (http://maffamatix.com/tested.mp3) in class when they forced us to mess around with some MIDI gear.  It's the first song I've written since I was 4 years old, and probably the last.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 14, 2007, 06:39:24 AM
Thanks for the feedback guys, I really appreciate it. Very helpful to get some perspective on stuff, my fiancee just gives me positive reviews :P

Raph, since you do a lot of acoustic stuff, could you expand on what you mean about the acoustic part? It was just my cheap Alvarez run through a crappy patch on my GT-6 direct in to the recorder. There's a volume boost and a little verb on it. I've never been able to find a good setup for that guitar, my Baby Taylor sounds so much better recorded through my SM-58 lying on the coffee table :P Not sure if there's any hope for the Alvarez, I'd hate to get rid of it because the fiancee loves it (it was my main guitar when we were first dating).

I mean, it's got a jangly tone I'm not a big fan of, I prefer nylon-stringed guitars (Willie Nelson FTW). Also, the rhythm is easily the weakest part imo because I haven't really been working on chorded rhythms much, I usually just play fragments and inversions on the electric (even if I don't know what half of them actually are :P). Not really sure how I could improve the rhythm part without a drum part, I guess part of getting this setup together is getting a good instrumentation setup in my head :) I was spoiled when I was young, always had a band to work my ideas through.

The bass...yeah, I've always been accused of being a bit busy. There are a few places where I don't think it worked because I was trying to jam in a phrase that didn't quite fit. Overall, though, it's a stylistic thing. If I could play like Duck, I would. But that's how I play bass, and I don't really have time to focus on improving my bass skills without removing focus from improving on guitar (especially the aforementioned rhythm stuff).

When Raph says I'm trying to hard...it just sounds that way. I don't even really pay attention to how notey it is, I'm just thinking ahead to the next phrasing and playing off the cuff. But it's a valid criticism, my fiancee is always telling me to give it some more space, especially when we watch Buddy Guy who's phrasing is monstrously good (I guess she does give good criticism now and again, heh).

My voice. Yeah. We'll get there. I usually add a drop of verb to a finished recording, forgot to put it on this one when I bounced to stereo because I didn't give it a final mixdown, just the bounce to stereo. I already destroyed that vocal track on the original trying to change it around. Got one really nice verse (again inspired by Janis who I've been listening to lately), but it's at the top-end of my range and there wasn't much room to riff on things and it REALLY fell apart on the third verse because I tried to change it up too much.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 14, 2007, 06:44:02 AM
Best way to record an acoustic is to DISTORT it  :grin:

Mmm, Jumpin' Jack Flash/Street Fighting Man style


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 14, 2007, 06:58:47 AM
To be serious though, I don't really see much wrong about how it's recorded though. I mentioned dissonance earlier, and that's just to do with syncing and some of the mix levels clashing. A better backing guitar track for that song should be a little more muffled, trebs and level down, etc.. Think jazzy. Kind hard to pull off with a typical steel string, but it can be done. Or hell, you can do the rhythm on the electric too, of course.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on December 14, 2007, 07:19:17 AM
And for the sake of humor, I composed this (http://maffamatix.com/tested.mp3) in class when they forced us to mess around with some MIDI gear.  It's the first song I've written since I was 4 years old, and probably the last.

It just needs some LL Cool J saying, "I'm in love girl."


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 14, 2007, 10:42:24 PM
What I meant was that you were getting fuzz and crackle on the acoustic part, but only some of the time. That's a tricky line to walk tonally, for me. (YMMV). I would either play it up or play it down. Most of the time, getting the touch of distortion only on loud signal just sounds messy, especially on a rhythm part which is supposed to be backgrounded and filler. If you think about it on electric guitars, when you aim for that sort of "clean sometimes" sort of tone, it usually happens because of multiple strings vibrating at the same time, not just because of playing one note louder.

Most low-end acoustic pickups aren't very good at capturing the sound of wood, and the result is a tone that to me always sounds like rubberbands. :) This is just an issue with pickups, unless you're up at the high end with something like a Taylor ES system (drool) or a Fishman Blender style thing.

Poor man's version of the blender effect would be to record direct and also mike the guitar, record on two tracks simultaneously, then adjust the mix to get the balance of tone you want. This is probably why your Baby sounds better miked -- no pickup involved.

If you want to try miking to get better acoustic tone and just have the one mic, try pointing it at the 12th fret. If you want to try better tone via the pickup, try turning the volume knob down on the pickup, adjusting the tone knob towards mid or lower end, and boosting the volume on the amp instead. And fiddle some with the EQ. A pickup on an acoustic tends to emphasize the treble too much. And try older strings, which jangle less -- that jangle gets magnified greatly.

The rubberbandy sound isn't BAD per se, btw. It just conjures up Ovation guitars to me. :)

BTW, I meant the vocal was what sounded like it was trying too hard -- not the song as a whole. There were some places where the growl sounded a little affected to me, like you tried too hard to get it.

PS, "Hehe Raph finally gets to be a critic"

Heh, people either forget or don't know: I spent years in writing workshops and have an MFA, I studied music theory and composition in college, and studio art to boot. I AM a critic. ;) Or can easily be one, anyway!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 15, 2007, 08:17:12 AM
Woo, great feedback, thanks Mr Critic!  :grin:

On the 'affected' growl...that's actually me trying to sing in tune on the one hand and trying to keep it from sounding metal on the other. It's really difficult, part of my searching for my voice. But you're definitely right, that track has been very difficult for me. I tend to sing Muddy and Junior Wells stuff a lot better, BB and Otis Rush much less so.

Re: Ovation sound. I completely understand with just that phrase :) I'll mess around with the stuff you mentioned. You guys have probably noticed I'm not the most methodical and patient person in the room...I like to plug in and lay it down. This morning my voice was totally shot thanks to a head cold...but that's when I get this incredible low register going. Wanted to lay down She's Nineteen Years Old and rushed recorded it simply awful. I need a drum machine or something, that's one reason for the acoustic base track on Thrill Is Gone. Great vocal part on the 19yo track, though, hate to lose it.

I wish I could remember a fraction of my college training, studio engineering major, theory minor. Now I construct chords by pattern  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 15, 2007, 08:56:24 AM
Dude, who can sing Otis Rush except.... Otis Rush? Don't even sweat it :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 18, 2007, 06:47:57 AM
So. Drums. What do you guys use? I have a real kit, but I can't really set it up at my apartment and driving out to my parents to record them is not feasible. Of course, I'd prefer laying my own drums tracks. So I need something electronic, I guess.

We used to have an awful Alesis machine, later we upgraded to a Boss I used at school. I remember that being nicer but still pretty limiting. Looking at musiciansfriend.com, that same (or minorly upgraded) Alesis is still around. Arg. The 'cheap' Boss ($280) sounds real limiting (only two measures at a time?) and the better one ($500) is loaded with nonsense I don't need (COSM, bass lines). If I had to buy one, I'd probably save up for the better Boss unit, which would probably push it into next summer (since I'll be getting a guitar amp soon!).

I'd be interested in any feedback on units you guys have used, or alternatives like software even though I'd rather have a dedicated unit and not dick around with the pc unless it was a really compelling package.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 07:00:07 AM
I use a neighbor. I also used to use an old Akai MPC, with a bunch of nice drum samples on it [you could feed any samples you want.. I believe the drum disc I had was made by Roland though.. Had dozens of real kits]. I'm just not very creative with drum dynamics though, so even with that kind automation, my beats aren't that good.

Either way though, I haven't recorded anything in awhile, let alone anything that needed a drum track. Pretty much slackin' on the entire music thing, I guess.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on December 18, 2007, 10:46:49 AM
MPC is good, but it can get a little expensive.  If you have a laptop, throw a copy of FL Studio on it and use that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 19, 2007, 08:47:29 AM
I have an Alesis SR-16. But a fair amount of the time I use loops for Acid Pro. Occasionally I'll pull out shakers or the bongos, but not often.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 19, 2007, 09:04:16 AM
Let me know what you end up with, Sky.  I've been considering buying a drum machine for years, but I can't get away from the subtle imperfections that make a live drummer a good thing to have.  I've actually been toying with the idea of just getting a cheap kit and learning to play better myself... though I have the luxury of owning a house in a quiet neighborhood. 

On a side note, I just picked up one of THESE (http://www.zzounds.com/item--SCEBJS1) for next to nothing on eBay.  I figured it would make a nice contrast to the Telecaster I've been playing and I didn't want to shuck out $1k for an SG or Les Paul until my skills get back to where they used to be. 

Now all I need is a new guitar head...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 19, 2007, 01:15:54 PM
I'm really just a frustrated drummer, I think.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 21, 2007, 11:08:16 AM
ARGHH!

I'm stumped.

Beeswing (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K18xQgDS3U)

Even with a tab (http://www.guitaretab.com/t/thompson-richard/19377.html)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 21, 2007, 11:34:16 AM
Beautiful song... god I wish I had that thing... what was it... oh, yeah: Talent. 

Thanks for the link.  I may tinker with this song over the Holidays.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on December 21, 2007, 11:40:28 AM
ARGHH!

I'm stumped.

Well he capo'd the 3rd and it sounds like a dropped tuning.  It looks like Am to F to start the chorus.  The section of video starting at 3:02 is instructive.  That's all I got from work.  Great song, though.

Edit: I'm an idiot.  I just noticed you linked the tab.  I'm not going to improve on that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 21, 2007, 11:47:42 AM
Think it's capo at 3, dropped D. I still suck though.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 21, 2007, 12:45:39 PM
Ah, Richard Thompson. I still haven't mastered "'52 Vincent Black Lightning" properly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxKTzwaEa2o


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 21, 2007, 12:47:28 PM
Yeah, 52 is great. I should probably just focus on that (although I suck at it too). I'm better with steel strings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 25, 2007, 09:39:55 AM
Musical gear in this year's gift pile:

  • Audio-Technica noise-cancelling headphones.
  • A keyboard stand. For the nice keyboard I need to get. Which one am I getting?
  • The Beatles Complete Chord Songbook.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2007, 10:16:01 AM
Uh, how big is the stand? I guess that'll dictate which board you'll get!

Are you interested in full blown synths or just digital pianos?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 25, 2007, 12:25:24 PM
I used to futz around with MIDI stuff in like 1992. :P Haven't in a long time. I guess I want something that feels like a piano (weighted keys, velocity sensitive), and that I can use as a controller. I have actual MIDI jacks all over the place, not just USB, btw.

I don't know what the typical way is these days to use a keyboard as a controller, what format for patches everyone prefers, and where you get the sounds. I loaded a SoundFont once. :)

The stand can handle a full-size keyboard. I think I'd rather have 88, but would settle for 61...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2007, 02:56:53 PM
USB or Midi, doesn't matter.

Mostly anything with 88 weighted keys will be a digital piano. There are vanilla controllers though that are more or less built the same way. M-Audio (http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/KeystationPro88-main.html) makes a pretty affordable one ($400 @ Musician's Friend (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/MAudio-Keystation-Pro-88-MIDI-Controller?sku=709203)).

Not very many of the fancier synths are weighted though, or even 88 keys for that matter.


Uhh, as for typical use these days.. Just running sequencing/soft synth programs as usual. That m-audio board above apparently comes with Ableton Live "Lite" -- not sure what the lite version has, but the normal version is one of the popular sequencer programs around these days (despite it's name, it's good for composing too, not just performance). There's always the big multitracker programs as well -- ProTools, Logic (and by extension Quicktime), Cubase. Can't go wrong with any of them either for multitracking or sequencing. The simple answer though is ProTools.

As for sounds... Umm. Any of the standard instruments through these progs will more than do. If you're really adventurous, you could build your own soft synths too --- this I know little about, and not sure what direction to point in. I could ask a buddy later.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on December 25, 2007, 05:18:00 PM
I agree, the M-Audio key stations are great if you're just using it as a controller, although I don't like the way the keys are weighted.  Can your budget incorporate something like a Triton or Phantom?  Those are the big two for MIDI right now, from what I understand.

I believe I mentioned it before, but FL Studio is a great program for MIDI sequencing, and it can incorporate homemade synths very easily.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 25, 2007, 10:45:56 PM
So, what I really want to do is just add richer arrangements to my music. So I don't want spacey synths, I want realistic stuff. A good piano sound, strings that don't sound like a synth.

I generally use Sibelius to capture notation, and if I make a MIDI it's usually from there because it will play it back with expression. I am incredibly rusty on keys but feel like I can work my way back to knowing my way around given some time.

So I want a) decent sounds b) something that feels good to play on

That's basically it. I don't know what I'd be controlling if I only had a controller, I guess. :) You tell me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 26, 2007, 01:47:07 AM
You could control any kind of virtual instrument you want. Not necessarily "spacey" stuff. :-)

There are some good software based instruments out there... Better than anything you'll find hardcoded in most keyboards. They can usually be interacted with as standalone programs, or as plug-ins for Cubase, ProTools, MOTU, Logic..

For a realistic piano, take a look at Synthogy (http://www.synthogy.com/index.html) (Rachmaninoff example (http://www.synthogy.com/demo/Rachmaninoff_op21n12.mp3)). It's not synthesis, but midi controllable sample playback/streaming -- at a pretty insane level. It's so extensive in sampling all of the dynamics and range of the 3 piano models it includes that it takes up about 40GB of space. It'll respond to whatever you're pounding away at on the controller.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 26, 2007, 06:55:26 AM
I want to get the fiancee something to get back into playing piano, so I'm also kind of interested in Raph's query. We looked at a bunch at the local music shop, but anything with decent key action was in the $1000+ range, which we're not quite ready to dive into. The consensus is we'll wait until we get a house and get a used piano, so I guess I have nothing to add to the discussion. Except to suggest you get a piano and mic it!

My big gift this year was enough money to get me into a decent amp (I've been saving most of this year, too). She's tired of hearing me use it as 'an excuse'.  :grin: I should've brought my SG to the last blues jam, though, the guy with the incredible Vero amp I linked before said I could've used his  :ye_gods: On the downside, he's the guy I wanted to jam with, he's got a sick chord knowledge.

On the playing front, I've been making some incredible breakthroughs. Baby steps, little things, but incredibly liberating. Also embarassing I'm learning this stuff over twenty years after picking up the guitar :) I blame the years I played bass :P Anyway, learning the neck through the CAGED system. It's finally filtering into my playing, we were watching the 2007 Farm Aid thing and Haynes does a nice acoustic version of Soulshine. I was playing along with open chords and then started to monkey around with playing different triads on the top three strings, it was wild. The CAGED system pwns. I may actually be a decent guitarist someday.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on December 26, 2007, 09:30:58 AM
Raph, you can save a good deal of money by purchasing a straight controller and having it run directly into Acid, which can use any of the numerous VST virtual synths out there.  I don't have much personal experience with VSTs, but I do know it's the most numerous of the plug-in formats.  The M-audio stuff already mentioned would be perfect for it.

Quick google search turned up this list of VST synths: http://www.synthzone.com/softsyn.htm

There are tons out there and you can edit the sounds on most of them, so finding the particular sound you're looking for is just a matter of experimentation  with parameters most of the time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 26, 2007, 09:47:27 AM
Agreed. Besides, I'd think the whole the soft synth thing would be up your alley anyways, being that you have an interest in software programming and design.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 26, 2007, 04:59:47 PM
So I went and found some free VSTs and messed with 'em with some of the Sibelius stuff I have notated and turned into MIDIs... easy peasy. :) Basically acts like a different MIDI instrument.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on December 26, 2007, 05:14:22 PM
So, what I really want to do is just add richer arrangements to my music. So I don't want spacey synths, I want realistic stuff. A good piano sound, strings that don't sound like a synth.

http://www.synthogy.com/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 26, 2007, 06:10:04 PM
For a realistic piano, take a look at Synthogy (http://www.synthogy.com/index.html) (Rachmaninoff example (http://www.synthogy.com/demo/Rachmaninoff_op21n12.mp3)). It's not synthesis, but midi controllable sample playback/streaming -- at a pretty insane level. It's so extensive in sampling all of the dynamics and range of the 3 piano models it includes that it takes up about 40GB of space. It'll respond to whatever you're pounding away at on the controller.


Nyah, nyah. Already linked to it Righ.


j/k  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on December 26, 2007, 07:29:55 PM
The wife gave me a gift certificate to Guitar Center at Christmas. Here's what I got:

(http://images.miretail.com/products/full/mitchell/633195038644841974_X.jpg)

It's a Mitchell concert uke with a spruce top and rosewood sides an fretboard. It has a very full and rich sound. I'd say I prefer it to my sopranos, and maybe even to my tenor.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on December 26, 2007, 07:31:51 PM
Nyah, nyah. Already linked to it Righ.

Ooops. I've heard it played live, and its decidedly more impressive than most other software. Rudess was also much more tolerable without the rest of Dream Theater. :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGk5aUDntwY


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 28, 2007, 07:56:30 PM
No keyboard yet, but those VSTs got me going. This is a quickie orchestration (http://www.raphkoster.com/music/MarketOrchestrated.mp3), quite incomplete, of a solo acoustic guitar instrumental from years ago. I didn't get around to orchestrating all of it, so I just repeated what I had several times with different arrangements.

Orchestrating is fun. I skipped that class in college somehow. Hmm.

I demand feedback. I know, not guitar, but it began life that way.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 28, 2007, 08:18:54 PM
Dang, you got right to work didn't you? Sounds cool. A little freestyley maybe, kinda hard for me to anchor on to the theme, but I still like it.

I don't mind anything that isn't guitars by the way. We should just name this the Musical Instrument Thread.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 29, 2007, 01:39:49 PM
Looks like I either get a MIDI controller that I can't play at a jam session, or get a digital piano that doesn't make for a good MIDI controller, or I get a Yamaha S90 and spend $2000. :P

Anyway, in wandering around pricing stuff on the Net, I stumbled across the Axon AX 50 (http://messe.harmony-central.com/Musikmesse07/Content/TerraTecProducer/PR/AXON-AX-50-USB.html). Kinda neat. Not that I know anyone who has a MIDI pickup on their guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 31, 2007, 06:55:36 AM
That's great, very baroque-y, and I'm a baroque whore. My girlfriend just asked for a copy.

I used to mess with this stuff back when I was in school, it's a lot of fun and you can get a pretty good output with a minimum of effort, and since it's notation you can strengthen that, if you're weak on it like I was and am again.

I went to guitar center yesterday, in the Big City. I felt totally dumb, unreasonably, playing way too fucking loud in the midst of about fifty musician strangers. Very uncomfortable and weird. So I only checked out a little of the Fender 65 reverb, which was cool. I had a Vox AC30 up on deck, but I was so far out of my comfort zone I ditched. If it doesn't snow too bad, I'm planning on heading out to the local guitar store (which has both amps) and playing in a more comfortable environment. Totally un-nerved me, because I've never been nervous or had stage fright, ever. It sucks. Also reinforced the thing I've been saying about not wanting to have my first jam with a blues band in public, don't these motherfuckers rehearse at all? Apparently not. I really don't want to share this, because I was incredibly stupid and vulnerable, but there you go. Even the cocky arrogant musicians (or at least formerly so) can be humbled by something as simple as trying out a new amp. Didn't bring my guitar, either, and all the SGs there sucked ass, the 61 rules imo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 31, 2007, 11:51:12 AM
Looks like I either get a MIDI controller that I can't play at a jam session

Laptop/Monitors/Keyboard. Should work well :)


When there's 50 shredders in the room who can smoke me (and there always is), I turn on an echo pedal and I play dub reggae riffs. Simple, but no one else around here can do it! Turns their heads every time.

If it's an acoustic, I play Prodigal Son.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 31, 2007, 12:07:31 PM
Laptop & all that feels obnoxious... ah well.

Maybe I will head up to Guitar Center to try some stuff out in person.

If you're a baroque whore, I can give you the guitar tab to that piece. :) Make the girlfriend happy... I look forward to hearing it as a reggae dub.

Just posted a year-end summary. Man, I posted a lot of music this year: http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/31/year-end-roundup/




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 31, 2007, 12:22:10 PM
I told you that you were inspiring this year, Raph!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 01, 2008, 11:58:40 PM
My Baby Taylor has developed a crack in the top, smack in the center, from the bridge to the heel. :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 02, 2008, 07:41:52 AM
DUCT TAPE FTW  :awesome_for_real:

That totally sucks. On the bright side, at least it didn't happen to a higher end guitar....I would honestly cry if something happened to my SG, I'm irrationally in love with it.  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 03, 2008, 11:37:19 PM
Hmm, I don't even know what to do about this. A repair is probably expensive, and the guitar itself is not. Plus, it is 7 years old. Is it likely to fly apart on me? The crack runs from bridge to heel. But it does not seem to be getting worse.

I tried calling Taylor to basically say "what do I do? I know you think I am terrible for letting it happen, and that you think I let it dry out or something, but it shows no other symptoms of that. Do I just go buy a new one?" But they are closed until Monday.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 04, 2008, 12:06:45 AM
I'm really good at giving electric advice, but repairing acoustics is such a bitch.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 04, 2008, 07:04:12 AM
A repair is probably expensive, and the guitar itself is not.
That was pretty much my thoughts on it. If it's not getting worse, just stick it out and see what happens. If it does get worse, try a local guitar shop (or see what Taylor says), not for a repair but for repair advice. It is a relatively cheap guitar despite the high quality, so radical repairs (or duct tape :awesome_for_real:) are probably worth trying yourself. If it doesn't work, you're out another $250 for a new Baby.

Fiancee just pointed out there are guitar repair books at your local library  ;D


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on January 04, 2008, 02:03:48 PM
Beat up guitars have improved sound.  Willie Nelson spent most of his time playing on a guitar that was slightly more hole than guitar.  Go with the flow.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 05, 2008, 07:37:18 AM
Man's got a point. Imo Willie Nelson has the best guitar sound evar. He's what drove me to take up guitar lessons in school just to get access to the nylon stringed guitars. My straight 100s in that class led me to music theory class (which was only for 4-yr music majors!) which I never dipped below 95 in.

Anyway, my fiancee was intruiged by how much influence Willie has on me, he's an amazing musician and songwriter. Because of his unique style, he can often have a bad performance and it's very difficult for others to jam with him, most of his live collabs fall flat. But when he's on, it's amazing. I don't even really consider it country music, his leads are amazing with jazz and spanish influences plus a mastery of melodic forms.

Oops, I gushed there. I heart Willie. I need a nylon string, shoulda bought that Taylor when I had a chance ($1400 Taylor for $800)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 05, 2008, 10:54:27 AM
I bet we all have ""guitar that got away" stories.

For me it was a Larrivee acoustic. We were at a music store shopping for my mandolin -- so we were about to blow around $1000 anyway. While we're there, I try out a guitjo, try out some of the guitars they have there... on the guitjo I cut loose with this fast flatpick breakdown thing I do in G, and after that, the shop manager starts steering me to specific instruments to try them out. So I try a Breedlove acoustic, and it's super gorgeous when mellow, but didn't have any snap, growl or bite in its tone at all.

Then we hit this Larrivee. Even more gorgeous mellow. But it also had bite. I played it for like 20 minutes, the manager & me and others clustered around. I keep saying "Man, that's a nice guitar" over and over. But we're here to buy the mandolin. The guy says "yeah, it's been here for maybe a year already, because a lot of folks don't know Larrivee, and it costs $2000... but..." And I am thinking to myself "But if I get a new acoustic, I kind of want the Taylor ES pickup system in it... and this has its own thing, and... hmm."

In the end, i regretfully shake my head and we buy the mandolin (which has been awesome). And Kristen says, "You know, if you really wanted it..." And I said no, because spending $3k was not in the plan...

I still daydream about that guitar and wonder if it's still there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 05, 2008, 02:46:15 PM
Ohh, the guitar that got away for me was a Fender Bass VI,  in lake placid blue like this one (http://www.gbase.com/files/store_images/414/1696248/photo1_c4537.jpg). They're one of the rarer production guitars Fender made (although they've been resissued just recently, in slightly different form). When I was younger, I saw one selling merely in the hundreds of dollars range. Now they run $6000-$7000.

They weren't really guitars, weren't really basses, and not really baritones either! They were tuned E-E and had a 30" scale, unlike most baritones, but the strings were a lot thinner than a bass (or a modern 6 string bass).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 05, 2008, 06:52:23 PM
I worked in a guitar store in downtown Minneapolis for 4 years during my teens doing bench work and setups.  The number of stories I have about lost opportunity are many. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 11, 2008, 08:35:41 AM
I broke my high E! It's the first guitar string I've broken in....well, I can't remember the last time I broke one. I did break a bass string about three years ago. I never change my strings. Was doing a Buddy Guy/Albert King 2 step bend over the V chord while playing for my fiancee. Can't even remember what brand or gauge I have on the SG.

Capped off a day full of bad luck, she told me to leave my guitars alone until midnight. Despite being anti-superstitious, I complied.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on January 11, 2008, 08:43:07 AM
I went through the first five years of drumming before I broke a stick.  Some kid in high school told me I wasn't a real drummer until I did.  That haunted me for a while, until I realized how much of an idiot he was.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 11, 2008, 03:21:01 PM
I always used to break the G string. Apparently, it's slightly likelier to break because of the amount of tension you have to put on it to get to pitch.

That said, these days I usually only break strings when tuning up, not when playing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on January 11, 2008, 07:51:18 PM
I haven't broken a string in almost 10 years.  And I am not easy on my strings.  They all have grooves worn into them from the fret markers.  I like to think they give the guitar some class and character that you just can't get from a new guitar off the shelf.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: DarkSign on January 11, 2008, 08:17:24 PM
I just found this thread. Who knew so many of you were fellow axe-men.

I've got a Chet Atkins Country Gentleman, a Flying V, and a Gibson Les Paul Studio.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 11, 2008, 08:50:16 PM
I've got a Chet Atkins Country Gentleman

Ouch! That's some mojo twangy goodness right there.


I break strings all the time. Every month at least. I think it's because of my smoking or something...Acidy fingers maybe? Not sure. I play big strings too, so that isn't a factor.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 12, 2008, 07:47:56 AM
http://guitarworld.com/backissueviewer

Also, I want your Chet guitar kthx. I'd also go for one of those Setzer models with the dice knobs, they smoke, too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 12, 2008, 12:49:20 PM
Wow, Guitar World has changed its vibe. I never pick it up because it's all glitzy these days. An article on 50 influential guitar recordings that is 1/4 steel? Wow.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 12, 2008, 06:25:31 PM
Laptop & all that feels obnoxious... ah well.

Maybe I will head up to Guitar Center to try some stuff out in person.


Ended up ordering a Yamaha P70. It'll be here Wednesday. I thought I was going to get an M-Audio ProKeys 88, but they didn't have any to try, and the keybed on the M-Audio Keystation 88 is the same -- I tried it and didn't like it. And I decided to get something people could play on at jams, which left out straight controllers. The Yamaha has less controller type features, but it played and sounded the best for under $2k.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on January 16, 2008, 07:34:57 AM
Went microphone shopping the other day and picked up these guys (http://www.guitarcenter.com/R0DE-Matched-Pair-of-NT5-Microphones-101778009-i1126923.gc) for stereo recording.  Guy at the store said they also make good vocal and guitar mics when used individually.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 16, 2008, 09:12:03 AM
Wow, Guitar World has changed its vibe. I never pick it up because it's all glitzy these days. An article on 50 influential guitar recordings that is 1/4 steel? Wow.
Yeah, it's pretty obnoxious and barely readable. But it's cheap and due to some errors on their end (missed a couple issues) and the closing of Guitar One, I have a sub until the end of next year. Haven't needed to pay on it since 2006, I think I've put a total of $20 into it.

I go back and forth on Acoustic Guitar mag. It's not really aimed at me, but I like some of their solo guitar transcriptions and every few months there is an interesting piece.

In bloggy type music news, I'm still needing a guitar amp, heh. At January's blues jam, the best guitarist in the jam was giving me a hard time for not bringing my guitar. So I'm trying to focus on getting a tune down solid so I can play in Feb. Mostly, it's remembering the damn lyrics, I have no memory for that, they slip right away. Going to do "She's Nineteen Years Old" based on a version I saw Buddy Guy do, with some alternate dirty lyrics he threw in "She got one leg in the east, one leg in the west, but it's what's down south that I like best".


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 16, 2008, 09:41:34 AM
Went microphone shopping the other day and picked up these guys (http://www.guitarcenter.com/R0DE-Matched-Pair-of-NT5-Microphones-101778009-i1126923.gc) for stereo recording.  Guy at the store said they also make good vocal and guitar mics when used individually.

Hmmph. Been mic-less myself for a long while now. Kind of half-assed in the market for some old 421's.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on January 16, 2008, 09:48:19 AM
What are you planning on micing?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 16, 2008, 10:17:03 AM
Guitar amps mainly, but I like mics that can do anything when I or anyone needs it. 421's and 57's are great at this. Besides a kick, an entire band could run off of them. I play my Vox more and more though, and it's already got a huge midrange bite. Not that a 57 or black 421 would be bad, but a silver 421 would be great for it. 441 wouldn't be bad either.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on January 16, 2008, 10:22:30 AM
Definitely.  A good all-purpose dynamic is just what you need.  Someone at my school described the 57 as the 'swiss army knife of microphones.'


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 16, 2008, 05:06:47 PM
I just have two mics:

ATM41HE (http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/wired_mics/2b9116f40d416b8e/index.html)
AT4033a/SM (http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/wired_mics/9da35d460627c96c/index.html) -- basically that one, altho mine is the SM version, somewhat older.

I use the ATM41 for most things, including miking the amp, if I need to.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 17, 2008, 06:06:39 AM
I've only got the one Shure SM58, the ol' battleaxe. Been meaning to pick up a couple 57s, that'll wait a while though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 17, 2008, 10:46:37 AM
I have a 58 and a 57.  I was unaware that any other mics existed outside of the studio!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on January 17, 2008, 10:59:03 AM
AT4033a/SM (http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/wired_mics/9da35d460627c96c/index.html) -- basically that one, altho mine is the SM version, somewhat older.

According to the specs on their site, the 4033 can really take a sonic beating!  145 dB SPL is pretty high for a condenser.

I'm planning on picking up some 57s myself.  zZsounds.com is running a pretty sweet deal on them, packaging in a 20-foot XLR cable and a boom stand.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 17, 2008, 11:00:46 AM
I'm planning on picking up some 57s myself.  zZsounds.com is running a pretty sweet deal on them, packaging in a 20-foot XLR cable and a boom stand.

Thanks for the heads-up.  I may have to grab one with that deal. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 18, 2008, 10:52:17 AM
AT4033a/SM (http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/wired_mics/9da35d460627c96c/index.html) -- basically that one, altho mine is the SM version, somewhat older.

According to the specs on their site, the 4033 can really take a sonic beating!  145 dB SPL is pretty high for a condenser.

I use this mic a lot less than the other simply because it is so damn sensitive. I mean, I am not in a studio situation -- I have zero soundproofing. If I turn up the gain to max, I'll get noises from the house next door. With it turned up even 1/3rd or so, I usually pick up most of the house. Gives a lot of "space" to the recordings, though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 20, 2008, 07:56:41 PM
New stuff: http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/01/20/the-sunday-song-let-us-just-be-music/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on January 21, 2008, 02:07:17 AM
I dig what you did with the cello.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 22, 2008, 07:57:58 AM
Just bought the Fender 65 reverb amp. Now I've got to find my guitar tone again. Blah. I like the amp, but it's such a new thing I'm back out of the comfort zone /again/, heh. It's louder than what I'm used to, since I've mostly been playing direct GT6 -> console -> headphones or GT6 -> Pignose. So now I have to re-learn how to play through a loud amp, it reacts very nicely to my pick attack, but I attack like a mofo in some sections and less in others, so it's uneven and can be unexpectedly loud, brings out a lot of stuff I never even knew I did (smacking strings percussively and whatnot). It's interesting and will be good once I get used to the volume and dial in my tone. Feel sorry for my landlord during the interim while I suck on it!  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 22, 2008, 08:05:16 AM
Ah, I didn't hear you bought that...

Is it the Deluxe Reverb? Because that shouldn't be too loud.

If you're talking Super Reverb, then yeah... It took me awhile to learn my lesson, but I won't get anything over 30 watts anymore. Can't get the ideal use out of amps like that. The deluxe's wattage would be great for me, but I don't really dig it's brightness (different story with Fender guitars than it is with your SG).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 28, 2008, 06:54:46 AM
65 Deluxe Reverb. It's not that it is LOUD, it's that I've been playing through headphones or a Pignose, as I said.

Still adjusting to the way the amp reacts to my pick attack, but overall I'm more than pleased with it. I still have to use my GT6 when I'm playing at low volumes, but when I can turn it up it's wicked. High end is still a bit thin and I'm trying to dial it in because I love a real sharp trebly sound to replicate some of the Muddy telecaster sound. The thinness does work when playing stuff that was recorded on a strat, I was doing some Buddy Guy rhythm lines from a Jr Wells recording and it was nice. But when I crank it up with the other pickup, nice warm sound, almost perfect.

Getting a lesson on using the volume and tone knobs, though. In the old days I always used pedals to control that stuff (not to mention I had shit guitars). With the bass I did use the controls for tone, but volume was mostly in the finger attack.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 28, 2008, 09:35:28 AM
Best way to get a Muddy sound is to get a Tele! There's a Muddy model actually, which is about the sweetest thing Fender does that's Mex made. Only problem is that it's only in red. :\

Picking real close to the bridge could help too. Most tele players do that anyways .


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 28, 2008, 11:30:42 AM
I own a mexican tele and it's the biggest piece of garbage I've ever laid hands on.  I immediately replaced the pickup and tuning pegs and it's just bearable.  The Schecter S-1 I just picked up blows it out of the water and it's not a particularly great guitar. 

Were I to get another Tele, it would have to be a standard.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 28, 2008, 11:42:26 AM
I'll take any donations, but another guitar isn't in the works for quite some time. A Tele is on the list, along with a maple neck Strat and a Gretsch. Right now the SG is about perfect for electric duties, though. My cheap Cort that I have set up for slide in open G is a single coil, though. Might be worth dropping a decent single coil in there and updating the electrics with something cheap but durable. Wouldn't want to put a lot of money into it, because it's a crappy guitar.

Saving for a honeymoon in Ireland now that I have an amp. Still thinking about a drum machine or something, though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2008, 08:14:41 AM
Bah, that version of 19 Years Old I posted took most of the criticism levied here into account and nobody posted a thing. Bah, I say! Not really intentionally changed due to the criticisms, but I figured I'd share it because it was naturally similar to the stuff you guys were saying. The vocals were much more comfortable for me, as it's one of my favorite tunes. Rhythm was done on an electric, bass was more traditional, yada. 

 :drill:

It was recorded before I got the amp, so it's all direct into the recorder, guitar via the Boss GT6. Thinking of getting a little pre-amp for the vocals, the phantom power in the recorder is a little weak and dry.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2008, 08:20:01 AM
Where the heck is the link?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2008, 08:37:01 AM
Took it down after a week. Time friggin Warner only give me 5 measly MB, not enough to fit a 5 minute song. The last couple songs I've leeched on a library host :) Shh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 29, 2008, 04:35:06 PM
It was an MP4. So I downloaded it, and found I couldn't play it without doing some other download... See, classic MMOG conversion funnel: persuade the mto download, then to log in, then to comment. Low conversion ratio. ;)

It's still sitting here on my desktop though. I'll download the codec at some point, I promise!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 30, 2008, 06:15:07 AM
Don't you people use iTunes? Heathens!

 :awesome_for_real:

(I'll remember to mp3 it next time, maybe)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 01, 2008, 08:51:50 PM
Good band I think you might like Sky. Old timey swing/acoustic/punk

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51pXYJwMyCL._SS500_.jpg)

Old Number 7 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNJowyYkoOs)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on February 04, 2008, 11:52:20 AM
I'd say more punky bluegrass.  I catch Devil Makes Three at the Tractor Tavern with a frequency.  The bassist is money.  She's about 4 feet shorter than her upright, but rips it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 04, 2008, 12:13:09 PM
Oh, I meant country/nashville swing. My bad. A lot of fast waltzy 7th chord stuff.

Really liking them though. Would be nice to see them, but it doesn't look like they tour outside of cali too much.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on February 04, 2008, 01:02:42 PM
They go up and down the west coast, but yeah.  Not so much east of the rockies.

Never Learn and Tow are classic songs.  Good times.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 04, 2008, 01:09:52 PM
Also, possibly the most frightening band I've heard since NWA. If you know what I mean? Attitude, balls, sincerity, belly of the beast shit. Ain't much of that goin' around anymore.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 05, 2008, 05:39:01 AM
Y'know, I'm just now realizing how cool Steve Stevens was. Those muffled riffs were slicker than anything other 80's hard rock guitarists were doing at the time. Plus, he could make his guitar sound like a laser gun (Rebel Yell solo). I could go on about Billy Idol himself, but I somehow ignored Stevens all these years.

Enjoy it again for the millionth time (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToeY7MkCm0c)

Agree or disagree?



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 05, 2008, 06:53:12 AM
Billy Idol taught me to sing. There, I said it. Well, not him exactly. I owned all his albums. They looked funny with all the Mercyful Fate, Slayer, Venom, etc.

Rebel Yell was a great rhythm piece bum JANK JANK JANK. Damned synths, though.

I really like that Devil Makes Three stuff. Sounds like a lot of stuff I've been listening to lately, except about 80 years later :) Like a jazzy piedmont sound.

Funny you mention balls in music, one of the things I want to bring to our local blues society is a set of nuts. Those white guys are so fuckin' pasty. As Big Bill said, them blues is s'posed to be barrelhoused! I'm trying to get them to bring in Otis Taylor, they're bringing in these lame pasty acts. Good guitars, but blues is about more than a good guitar line and cheesy blues band imo. Then again, I'm biased as my favorite signers are the hollerers...which is where the goddamned genre came from in the first place. Robert Cray can suck my dick.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 05, 2008, 08:19:56 AM
Y'know, I'm just now realizing how cool Steve Stevens was. Those muffled riffs were slicker than anything other 80's hard rock guitarists were doing at the time. Plus, he could make his guitar sound like a laser gun (Rebel Yell solo). I could go on about Billy Idol himself, but I somehow ignored Stevens all these years.

If you haven't heard the music he made with Terry Bozzio and Tony Levin, you're missing his best stuff:

http://www.magnacarta.net/audiofiles/bozziolevinstevens/473_sitdangerous-3.mp3

http://www.magnacarta.net/guitar/songs/4.mp3



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on February 05, 2008, 08:57:28 AM
Funny you mention balls in music, one of the things I want to bring to our local blues society is a set of nuts.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/music/wma-pop-up/B00004WFCY002006/ref=mu_sam_wma_002_006

Those white guys are so fuckin' pasty.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU


For blues I'm mostly listening to R.L. Burnside and Sonny Boy Williamson.  No fucking around there.  It makes me very  :sad_panda: when people think the blues is a 15 minute guitar solo over a 12-bar rhythm.  I'm looking at you, Stevie Ray Vaughan.  Yeah, I said it.  Jerking your whammy bar while you play relentless blue notes and make the "O" face is not the blues. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 05, 2008, 09:43:28 AM
Can't hear the amazon link, it must be the old WMA engine they used. Doesn't play nice with safari. The new embedded player works fine. Given your second link...  :awesome_for_real:

For blues, I listen to tons of stuff. Critically I've been listening to Broonzy, Son House (thinking of covering American Defense), Blind Willie Johnson for the acoustic guys. Electric mostly Junior Wells, Howlin' Wolf, Muddy (always Muddy, Our Lord and Saviour), and some Peter Green-era Mac. I like both the guitar solo kind of stuff and the old barrelhouse acoustic stuff. But I feel the former is lacking if you don't know the latter.

SRV is ok by me, not my favorite. But I do get annoyed (as do most fans of older blues) when he is considered synonymous with blues. Buddy Guy called someone an ignorant motherfucker at a show I saw because Buddy was telling stories about the old timers and someone shouted out SRV. "SRV. SRV? You ignorant motherfucker. SRV was good and all, but sit there and learn about the fuckin' blues" was about how it went.

By Sonny, do you mean Rice Miller or the original? I've got a great Rice Miller album (King Biscuit Time) where you can hear the band hanging out between songs. It's really good stuff. But our local best harp player (who also digs the old and new) insists I get a disc of original Sonny Boy, who is his biggest influence along with Little Walter and Jr Wells.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on February 05, 2008, 10:57:57 AM
The second.  I think it's hilarious he basically jacked another guy's name.  That's extra bluesy.  I haven't heard much of the original.  I keep meaning to get into Robert Johnson (what it's possible to get of him) and Son House.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd60nI4sa9A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jN5vqEyV7g


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 05, 2008, 11:27:28 AM
Just get the Complete Recordings (http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Recordings-Robert-Johnson/dp/B000002ADN) of Johnson, he didn't record much. I wasn't very erudite when I got my Johnson disc and it's only like 16 of the 41 he recorded. Both he and Son are great. Son influenced both Johnson and Muddy, so he's got a special place in history even beyond being a great musician with a classic tortured preacher/bluesman schism.

Blind Willie is on the Voyager spacecraft with this amazing tune: http://youtube.com/watch?v=BNj2BXW852g Here's one of Willie with his wife that showcases the vocal style (which I really dig): http://youtube.com/watch?v=7R8RuOagzck

Junior Wells doing one of my favorites with Otis Rush on geetar: http://youtube.com/watch?v=47djAb6jVJk

Muddy Waters used to say you couldn't play the blues too slow. Here he demonstrates the concept quite well with Junior and Buddy backing: http://youtube.com/watch?v=oiEBopPts1E


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 05, 2008, 03:16:38 PM
Y'know, I'm just now realizing how cool Steve Stevens was. Those muffled riffs were slicker than anything other 80's hard rock guitarists were doing at the time. Plus, he could make his guitar sound like a laser gun (Rebel Yell solo). I could go on about Billy Idol himself, but I somehow ignored Stevens all these years.

If you haven't heard the music he made with Terry Bozzio and Tony Levin, you're missing his best stuff:

http://www.magnacarta.net/audiofiles/bozziolevinstevens/473_sitdangerous-3.mp3

http://www.magnacarta.net/guitar/songs/4.mp3



Those are cool, but it's his rhythm I like the most (the "bum JANK JANK JANK" that Sky mentioned). The second track there kind of has it at first though.

Billy Idol taught me to sing. There, I said it.

Same here. I'm a baritone, and can just growl through my throat, so singers like that are natural fit. When I was real young though, he was like the "ultimate rockstar" to me... Even if there's only a handful of good songs. The dude's got a little bit punk, new wave, glam, Elvis and Morrison crooning, and the coolest hair EVER.


My favorite bluesman is Otis Rush. I've said that before in this thread, I think. And of course, Robert Johnson.

Keith will always be my favorite "pasty" blues player. Even if he's just mostly rhythm.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 05, 2008, 04:53:31 PM
Just to continue on my Steve Stevens kick... Can any of you do that Rebel Yell intro? Where he's tapping the 10th fret on the b and e strings, but playing that little walk line in b at the same time? I'm having trouble... I know HOW to do it. I just can't.

On a nylon (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSxyMTFfV2A)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 05, 2008, 08:07:05 PM
Ooh, 3 posts in a row.  8-)


Was just gonna say, since I was trying that Steve Stevens shit on my acoustic, I started messing around with other shit. I don't think I've ever posted ANY of my music here, have I? Anyways, this is my humble little start. I don't have any good mics at the moment, so I used my webcam's.

I've rambled about this open minor tuning I play in a lot.. Raph was puzzled about it once, I think. It's Open G minor (just open G, with an additional downtuning of the B string down a half step to A sharp). I do little frenchie/gypsy sounding rhythms in it. Easy way to get droning minor chord sounds, and easy access to 7ths.

ANYWAYS, nothing special or virtuosic. Just wanted to show an example of what I meant.

I'll call it... Making Ends Meet (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/making_ends_meet.mp3)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 05, 2008, 10:40:19 PM
Lol, I'm re-listening to that... Sketchy as shit!  :grin:

Hard to detect the rhythm there maybe. I'm playing with a steel string capo, which made it difficult (strings would buzz if I struck too hard). Oh well.

[edit] Here's a plucked version of the same chords. Link (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/ends_meet2.m4a). Hah, now it sounds like a Tetris song. Easier to follow rhythm though, I guess. Just to get you to know where I was shooting at.

Sorry for the sketchiness though.. I was just noodling around like 5 minutes before I posted the other one. Noodling here too. Maybe I should make an actual composition out of this.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 06, 2008, 06:37:09 AM
Sorry for the sketchiness though.. I was just noodling around like 5 minutes before I posted the other one. Noodling here too. Maybe I should make an actual composition out of this.
Now you're sounding like me!  :grin:  I really like it, you should expand it to a full tune. Would you mind if I threw some vocals down on it? It's got a great swing.

On the Rebel Yell intro: he's combo picking it, he's got really good combo picking chops. Playing the walking bass with the pick and plucking the top figure with his fingers. Don't feel to bad, I can't play two lines with separate rhythms, either. It's related to why I'm not a drummer, I'll never be a great acoustic blues guitarist. I can do some fun things but it's just faking it mostly.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on February 06, 2008, 11:06:01 AM
I knew I heard the name Steve Stevens elsewhere and I couldn't remember where.

Then I realised who did one of the songs on my Ace Combat 6 playlist (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCTJmXrgsFg)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 06, 2008, 06:07:26 PM
Sorry for the sketchiness though.. I was just noodling around like 5 minutes before I posted the other one. Noodling here too. Maybe I should make an actual composition out of this.
Now you're sounding like me!  :grin:  I really like it, you should expand it to a full tune. Would you mind if I threw some vocals down on it? It's got a great swing.

On the Rebel Yell intro: he's combo picking it, he's got really good combo picking chops. Playing the walking bass with the pick and plucking the top figure with his fingers. Don't feel to bad, I can't play two lines with separate rhythms, either. It's related to why I'm not a drummer, I'll never be a great acoustic blues guitarist. I can do some fun things but it's just faking it mostly.

I'm a lefty playing righty, so my picking chops will be off. Helps dexterity on the fretboard though.

Anyways, yeah you can put a vocal on there. I could put it in a lower key if you want. I might make at least one part for the song as well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 06, 2008, 10:14:37 PM
I was trying something more swingy, but it turned out to be kind of hard to get right in recording. I'll look into it later maybe.

Was just gonna posting something else. It's the same wacky tuning, but with the bottom string down to C now. Again, I'm not trying to show my leet chops or anything (I don't have any), but this is an example of something completely different in that tuning. Kind of sounds like a j mascis song or something.

I'll call it.... Blowfish (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/blowfish.mp3). Because it sounds watery and fat.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 07, 2008, 06:12:01 AM
Eh, by the time I got it home and on the 8-track, I forgot my inspiration and nothing was fitting in. Rule #1 of writing is you have to do it when the inspiration strikes. Kinda tough when you also have to work a 9-5. Ah, well.

Stray, nobody on here has leet chops  :grin: Raph's a good singer/songwriter and I'm a good noodler, but we're nothing special compared to the big kahunas imo. Even when I'm playing fast or wailing, it's not to show off, I'm too old for that crap. I'm glad you're sharing some stuff, makes this forum more interesting :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 08, 2008, 07:24:55 AM
I'll call it.... Blowfish (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/blowfish.mp3). Because it sounds watery and fat.

I like it.  It has a really mellow feel and lots of potential for a bridge. 

About chops: what Sky said.  I'm a solid bass player and was a very good songwriter in my day, but I'm humbled by people out there doing it for a living.  Just enjoy what you're doing!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 08, 2008, 03:16:05 PM
That's all I do! Try to enjoy myself I mean. I play for my own therapy mainly. Not self conscious or anything, I don't care about chops. Just a fair warning, since I know there are some prog-ish types here. Most of my stuff is like that, just alt/poppy/punk riffage. I just spew out that stuff at will. I don't really take the time to compose anything. Especially not with a webcam mic! I like playing a lot of twangy spaghetti western leads too..With a lot of those ringing Link Wray chords. Who was the shit by the way, and didn't have "chops" in the technical sense at all.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 15, 2008, 11:27:40 PM
Ok, this is an obscure question.

Anyone know who played Bark at the Moon with Ozzie at the 2007 VH1 Rock Honors?  It doesn't look like Jerry Cantrell (although I guess it could be him if he grew a beard as you don't get a great shot of his face) who is the last guitarist that I know of who was working with Ozzy. I see the video pretty much every week during Metal Mania and it bugs me that I can't place who it is.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 16, 2008, 12:01:03 AM
Had to search for it.. Never saw it before...

That's definitely Zakk.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 16, 2008, 11:32:58 PM
Duh. I feel el stupido now.

Didn't realize he was back with Ozzy which is why I didn't place him.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 16, 2008, 11:50:09 PM
Heh yeah. Just remember: If the guitar has a white and black bulls-eye, if the guitarist looks like a cross between a biker and Thor, and if every other note he plays is a squeeling harmonic, then it is no other than Zakk Wylde.

Kick ass version of the song too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 17, 2008, 12:00:16 AM
Ya, I thought that version was really well done, which is why I asked. I can't believe I spaced on it being Zakk. I think this means I am getting old.  :sad:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 17, 2008, 12:02:17 AM
Oh, and speaking of bikers and Thor, does anyone here like Valient Thorr? Link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zvh_N64nCZo) (not the best track imo, but cool)

Fun band. Good, classic riffage. Records like they sound live. Funny gimmick (in this age where music woefully lack a good gimmick):

Quote
The short version of the story, as told by "Valient Himself" [his full name], goes like this: The band was traveling through time and space from Venus doing scientific research and visited Earth three times -- 1957, '63 and 2000. They were traveling in time to research ways to save life on Venus. At some point Himself and his crew stashed their time machine outside of Arlington, Virginia, and Walt Disney stole it.

"He's a wily guy," Himself said of Disney. "He could still be alive floating through space right now, or he could've just burned up. Who knows if he knows how to operate that thing?"

Now the band is stuck here on Earth attempting to find a way to save Earth from the fate of Venus through its guitar-driven, Southern-rock-meets-power-metal music.

"Warring and other things lead to the demise of our planet and we see a lot of the same things happening here on Earth," he said. "Rock n' roll on Earth is one of the most important and powerful weapons ever created. If it is used for the right things its power is unstoppable."


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 17, 2008, 12:09:50 AM
I just realized that the last time I saw Ozzy live was when Jake E. Lee was playing with them, i.e. 22 years ago. Good god where does the time go.

Sorry, I'm being maudlin tonight and crying in my beer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 17, 2008, 12:20:59 AM
I have unfortunately never seen the Oz Man. He popped around here for awhile for all of this ozfests, but that was probably my last chance. I think he's getting tool old and unhealthy for touring.

I DID however, almost get in a fight with some guys from Slipknot just blocks from the ozfest. Didn't know it was slipknot at the time of course (what with them usually wearing those masks and all)... But the fuckers stole a cigarette from my buddy. We all got kicked out and the police called on us. I'm sure Ozzy would have been proud.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 17, 2008, 12:29:57 AM
It was a great show. Metallica opened for him supporting Master of Puppets. I remember not liking them very much as it was the first time I had really heard speed metal. Of course a month later I bought all their albums. Heh.

We were really blessed in SLC as there was a huge metal fan base in the 80s and big acts always played here at the old Salt Palace although I do remember Iron Maiden being bumped into a convention hall because a Monster Truck show got double booked on the same date.  We were pissed but it was a good show anyways.

EDIT: Heh, and as a true "plate of shrimp" moment the A Shot in the Dark video comes on Metal Mania as I am hitting the post button.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 17, 2008, 12:36:10 AM
Damn, Metallica (with Cliff!) opening for Ozzy. I was too young for that sort of thing.

Haven't seen that many popular metal bands, for that matter. I mean.. White Zombie might be the biggest and best one (during the Thunderkiss years, not the electronic stuff). That was a small venue too, really great. Sean Yseult ended up having an appendicitis right at the hotel by my house, after the show. Not so great. She was hot.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 17, 2008, 12:41:39 AM
Yes, Sean was very hot. I'll make you jealous. I saw them at the 9:30 Club (which holds at most 100 people) on that same tour. One of the most amazing "club" shows I've ever seen. We BSed our way back stage based upon running the GU radio station and hung out with them after the show (this was our schtick at the time and was incredibly effective with the bands that played the 9:30 as most weren't all that established yet, and therefore desperate to ingratiate themselves with "radio" people, although many became huge successes) . Rob was (and seems to still be) an incredibly cool guy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 17, 2008, 12:50:25 AM
Yeah, my friend got to bullshit with them a lot because he was working in that hotel. I was jealous. I thought that band was the shit at the time. They were on tour with Prong too (really underrated)... Tommy Victor (singer/gits) I have gotten to meet since. He's a cool guy. Even wanted me to be a tech for some fucked up reason.

I miss small shows like that. Or at least "tolerable" large shows (I imagine that Oz/Metallica show couldn't have been that bad, for a large one). That's why I haven't gone to anything like ozfest to see Ozzy. I either like bars or general admission. Not to derail from metal, but my dream would be to "happen" to be in one of these bumfuck bars that the Stones apparently set up in occassionally when they're on the road. The pricing isn't the thing that gets me about modern concerts really, it's the lack of intimacy. Seeing any good band, playing in a type of place where they cut their teeth at, is the greatest thing. I've seen a couple like that when the band wasn't that big yet, and it's always good.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 17, 2008, 12:52:19 AM
I agree. There really isn't anything like being up at the rail or in a tiny club at a great concert.  Being in the upper deck of some arena isn't even close.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 20, 2008, 07:32:29 AM
I went to the Metallica/Ozzy show for Metallica. Oz was all glammed out, kinda sad. Still a decent show, but Metallica kicked his ass five ways to wednesday. Last time I saw Metallica, unless you count listening to them from the parking lot of the last woodstock while drinking beer.

I saw Oz with Zakk back in the early 90s, but he had some guy named Joe (forget the last name, one of Randy's students) who channeled Randy at the first Sabbath reunion Ozzfest. Zakk is a monster guitarist, with more range than most people give him credit for (love his southern rock).

I watched the Lennon Imagine movie for like the hundredth time last night and dug out Abbey Road. What a great album that was. Recorded a blues version of I Want You based on a Jr Wells riff. Wish I had a band, but what a pain in the ass that is.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 20, 2008, 07:36:34 AM
I'm a big Zakk Wylde fan.  His sound just oozes power, for lack of a better word.  I listen to No More Tears quite often, and dig every minute of it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 20, 2008, 07:47:15 AM
Lennon was so much the shit in the post Beatles years (in the Beatles years too, of course). Imagine isn't one of the harder tracks (still like it though), but a lot of the stuff he did after the Beatles was raunchy. I love the production on those early albums, real blues-y. Also, I think Yoko wasn't such a bad influence on him.

Abbey Road is my favorite Beatles album. We should figure out how to lay some tracks with that, Sky. I can play all the parts to I Want You pretty well. Also, Paul kicks all kinds of ass on that song.

Because just gives me the chills. Sun King is another favorite track.

[edit] I've always wanted to play I Want You with someone actually. Can't do it alone and sound right really. One of the guitars needs to be a drop-D, I believe.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 20, 2008, 01:01:27 PM
Speaking of I Want You:

http://www.guitaretab.com/b/beatles/1159.html (http://www.guitaretab.com/b/beatles/1159.html)

Holy crap, I can't decipher that. I don't play it that way at all. I just start with a simple dm chord. There's another part of that main riff that's just bass strings, but I figured it was a second guitar. I'm not sure if the person in that tab is trying it all at once or not. I'll play the two parts I know here (the bassier part runs afterwards)...

Sample (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/i_want_you_sample.mp3)




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 08:08:37 AM
3 in a row  :oh_i_see:


Here's another cool Lennon track, Sky Well Well Well (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhYrMb6pJQw)

Kind of like I Want You... In both songs, I like how he matches the vox to the main blues riff.. I can't do that shit well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 21, 2008, 08:13:08 AM
Stray,

I bought The Complete Beatles (http://www.amazon.com/Beatles-Complete-Scores/dp/0793518326/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203611598&sr=8-1) a few years ago and have found it helpful in better understanding structure.  I will comment that the book is less than perfect, but does help you get the basics of the song down quickly.  Developing the rest just takes a bit of time and experience. 

It's also a bargain at that price (like $50 for 1100 some pages).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 08:21:11 AM
The Beatles are great for contemporary (ish) arrangement, harmony and composition. I wasn't that into them when I was younger, though I of course know most of their stuff (hippy uncle who played piano). When some music school friends of mine tried to turn me onto them, I was more interested in Bach (interested = obsessed, actually).

Anyway, Stray's version of IWY is waaaay more straight than the one I did. I didn't want to ass around actually learning it!  :awesome_for_real: Actually, one reason I did it the way I did was thinking of playing it at the blues jam, where you can't play anything non-standard unless you have a band (because the house band + random peeps won't know it, so my version of Since I've Been Loving You languishes). So I basically made it a 12-bar blues and destroyed it, just for fun. I call it deconstructionist blues, taking what rock had progressed from the blues back to the old formats (actually that's ironic punning, because I hate deconstructionist art). I have a great version of After Midnight (Clapton) done in a real skanky delta/chicago blues.

I'd post it up, but I forgot to mix it down to stereo. I also had a HELL migraine the last couple days, so it's even worse than my usual 1-take schlock, it's one-take and not very interesting and the vocals are pitchy, dawg. I couldn't really think about it much, I was just trying to jot down the concept, mostly. Had to be 1-take because my head split apart after it, heh. Did do the guitar through the new amp, which I'm loving (with ear-plugs, I'm old and the room is small).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 08:21:54 AM
Stray,

I bought The Complete Beatles (http://www.amazon.com/Beatles-Complete-Scores/dp/0793518326/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203611598&sr=8-1) a few years ago and have found it helpful in better understanding structure.  I will comment that the book is less than perfect, but does help you get the basics of the song down quickly.  Developing the rest just takes a bit of time and experience. 

It's also a bargain at that price (like $50 for 1100 some pages).

That's actually pretty expensive for me. Thanks though.

I'm not too big on books, other than theory/instructional ones. I find a lot of times that songbooks have transcriptions that are off a lot.. Sometimes with a note, or sometimes in just where they place a note (like a dm chord at the 5th fret on the A string is a different beast altogether from dm on the D string).


I don't have a problem with learning most songs anyways. Not rhythms at least. She's So Heavy isn't one my problems at least. I know that part I posted is correct. There's just another part that George plays in Drop D (you'll most hear it in the last romp at the end of song) -- it's those bass notes I posted in the last part of my clip. The blues riffs where John sings are easy. Basically though, what I'm saying is that it's at least a two person song. Doesn't sound right otherwise.

The only thing truly hard about that song is Paul. He fucking KILLS on it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 08:30:17 AM
Kind of like I Want You... In both songs, I like how he matches the vox to the main blues riff.. I can't do that shit well.
Actually I find it much easier to stay in tune and sing along like that. The riff changes too much and I can't do both simultaneously. Hendrix showed me that trick and I'm working on it.

But yeah, you need at least two people, or a multitrack. I love mine, so glad I got it (the MR8HD). And listening to Abbey Road gives me a new appreciation of Paul, I never cared for him but I hadn't done any critical listening, either.

On books. I like them. They can fill in little things I'm missing. I'm really good at picking things up by ear, but I also like the visual. And the stuff you're saying about correcting the transcriptions, that's key, man. That's good theory in practice, it's something they teach in school, transposing things around the way you like it. One reason I never use a capo, I like to learn to play in as many keys as possible in standard setup. Then you can get into inversions and triads and stuff. I like learning the basic progressions and then fucking around with them until it morphs into something entirely different while still being the same song, spiritually. I used to do that a lot more when I smoked pot, though, I'd groove for hours on a riff and morph it all over, don't have the attention span without the weed, though.  :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 21, 2008, 08:38:53 AM
I really recommended the book only because reading music scores often helps me get a mental image of the composition.  Tabs really do nothing for me as I often play song in a different position than most of the common tab writers (this is particularly true on bass, where I prefer playing in positions up the neck rather than down by the nut). 

If you've ever played a Hoffner, you'll know why Paul can play a lot of what he does.  They have necks more like a guitar than a bass.  Don't get me wrong though, the guy is still a very good bass player.  I've found that once I get a feel for where Paul is on the neck, that he tends to follow similar patterns in the more common songs.  Dare I say that he becomes a tad predictable. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 08:52:02 AM
See, but.. (and I hate to get all Beatles-phile here  :grin:), Paul switched to a Rick in those later years. He was playing a Rick around Sgt Peppers till Abbey Road. The Hofner still came in every so often, but it wasn't his main thing at that point.

I understand where you getting at with his feel though. He's fairly easy to find -- it's just that he's got that thing where he floats around those areas, but adds just the right bit of chaos to it all. Almost every bar has a subtle difference, and he stays on beat doing it. It's a good middle road between ho-hum rhythm and full blown wankery. I disagree completely with predictable -- listen to I Want You again.

Another unlikely favorite bassist of mine is.... Sting! People usually laugh when I say that, but he's got that subtlety like Paul.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 21, 2008, 09:04:44 AM
If you want to achieve full Beatles-phile status, you'll have to do better than the Rick bit.   I'll give "I want you" a thorough listen tonight. 

I agree with you on the rest.  I'm not a huge fan of wankery though I can appreciate the skill necessary to do it well (Pastorius, Wooten, Clarke, Claypool etc).  I'm a much bigger fan of subtle and melodic.  I love the Duck, for example.   Sting is a very "listenable" bass player.  The use of a frettless in pop music was a nice (albeit not new) touch.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 09:49:50 AM
Just kidding about the Beatles-phile thing, but I'm just saying. The Hofner wasn't his only thing, especially in the later/studio years. Just too damn bad that there aren't many vids from that time period to show him jamming the Rick -- There's All You Need is Love, Hello Goodbye, stuff like that. Not bass heavy songs really -- but it's the same era.

Anyways, he's admitted himself to his liking for the Hofner because it allowed him to move with speed, do more typical guitar techniques, shit like that. He was more comfortable playing with it live as well. What the Hofner sucked at was bad intonation in the high end of the neck/bassier sections (which wasn't corrected until recent models actually). He didn't play like a typical bass player with it.

"Because the Hofner's so light you play it a bit like a guitar - all that sort of high trilling stuff I used to do, I think, was because of the Hofner. When I play a heavier bass like a Fender, it sits me down a bit and I play just bass."

There's a sharp difference in the recordings after he got his Rick. He's playing more bass. It's heavier. It's not the sound of a Hofner. And unlike the Hof, he could play higher on the neck more often. Secondly, the Beatles vowed to stop playing live at that point. What Paul started doing after that was sitting around a lot in a studio -- And it was for that practical reason alone that he dropped the Hofner. You can't sit down with one. So he got a Rick -- then his sound changed. Technically, it was around Rubber Soul when he got it (and you'll hear it on Rubber Soul and Revolver tracks, like Taxman), but once they really started just becoming a studio band, that was his main instrument.

[edit] I should add that he went back to the Hof for Get Back/Let It Be period for a second, then moved to the Rick again on Abbey Road. There's a book called Beatles Gear, if you're interested in any of this. It's interesting to note some of the unlikely parts he played in songs as well.. Like the lead guitars in "And Your Bird Can Sing". (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ilx0KvBnZlY)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 10:52:34 AM
My bass (ESP custom shop) is very guitarish in the neck, except it's got a pretty long scale. I started on a wider neck (that got stolen), though. After my first bass was stolen, I used a friend's Rick, and it was a great bass. But I couldn't do a lot of the fiddly stuff higher on the neck, so it fits with the theory about Paul's playing. There were a couple tunes I had to basically rewrite during that period, just so I could play them live.

Also, I need to put new pickups in the puppy some day, never been happy with them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 02:56:22 PM
Again with Steve Stevens' multi-tasking.. White Wedding (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXBrFUBSmlM)

Really.. I've got devote myself to learning how he does that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 21, 2008, 03:01:13 PM
Great link.  I wish they had shown the guitar work more.  The guy is truly amazing... and makes it look effortless in the process. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 21, 2008, 03:46:15 PM
This one of the best books for understanding the Beatles recordings. Out of print, but generally available:

http://www.amazon.com/EMIs-Complete-Beatles-Recording-Sessions/dp/0600557847


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 04:16:17 PM
So... Is there a technical term for what Steve is doing? Maintaining a bass line whilst playing a arpeggio like in that version of White Wedding, or when he's tapping frets while playing a bass line in Rebel Yell? I'd like to know if there's a term so I can find simple lessons to do that. I hear classical/flamenco players do it all the time, so there must be something...

On a sidenote: If I could pull off White Wedding like those guys above, then I could have any woman I wanted. Almost sure of it.  :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2008, 09:22:36 PM
Here's my poor attempt at emulating Steve:

White Wedding (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/white_wedding.mp3)

Easy song really... But amazing what a difference cool technique can make. Technique I ain't got...


Anyways, something should try singing over it.  :awesome_for_real:

[edit] Somebody, I mean. Not "something".


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 22, 2008, 06:16:13 AM
Wouldn't it just be playing multiple parts? Some of the old blues guys would have three parts going on at once because they were imitating a whole band. They still blow my mind when I listen to them, it's why I listen to so much early recording.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 06:29:43 AM
Yeah, there's those old fingerstyle players doing it too.. Blind Blake, Leadbelly.. I just hear it a lot in classical music as well. I'm sure that's where Steve got his chops. I said before though that my (piss poor  :oh_i_see:) excuse is that I'm left handed -- but I play right handed. I'm doomed to never have good right hand technique.  :cry: It was a bitch when I started learning as a kid... But by the time I realized I was supposed to playing lefty guitars, it was too late.

Anyways... Here's a slightly improved version of WW. Hah. Improved the rhythm here maybe. I know it isn't original, but it's fun to play.  :-)

Link (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/white_wedding_2.mp3)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 07:25:33 AM
Alright, just to show I'm not just playing 80's covers, here's an original:

I'll call it the Phone Ringing Blues (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/phone_ringing_blues.mp3)  :angryfist:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 08:07:57 AM
ALRIGHT, one more for the road.... Sorry for the multiple posts. I guess I'm posting shit now because Sky used to comment on me not doing it.


So I'm gonna name this song for him:  :grin:


Organic Meat (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/organic_meat.mp3)

[edit] On a sidenote, I need to stop posting shit fifteen minutes after I made it up. Sounds empty. I vow to give you more intricacy later on!  :-P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on February 22, 2008, 01:17:36 PM
So... Is there a technical term for what Steve is doing? Maintaining a bass line whilst playing a arpeggio like in that version of White Wedding

I could get quite close to the verse by very fast downpicking the E string and 3 powerchords. I never play my accoustic with a pick so found it hard not to mute all the time as I don't play metal on it, but that's what it felt like I was doing :)

I've never seen that video before, but it's definetly the best version I've heard of the song.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 22, 2008, 03:56:53 PM
So... Is there a technical term for what Steve is doing?

Hybrid picking?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 04:36:13 PM
I guess that's it... Though it seems to be associated with country stuff.

..

Hell, I don't know. The hybrid picking examples I'm seeing are impressive, don't get me wrong, but the multiple parts seem to be basically following the same beat. What Stevens is doing seems trickier. Especially in the Rebel Yell intro.

I'm getting close like penfold with the main WW riff though.. Just using thumb and index finger though, no pick.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 22, 2008, 04:41:47 PM
Hehe. The power of Google:

http://www.skinnydevil.com/Stevens-1.html


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 04:46:03 PM
Thanks! Hybrid picking it is. Lol, at the midi samples though.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 22, 2008, 04:47:14 PM
I know. Clearly we shouldn't use the standard GM instruments there. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on February 24, 2008, 06:17:48 AM
I changed my rig this weekend. Now instead of setting up the >Pod Live>Peavy Express 112 amp or >Pod>PC>PC speakers or using ath amp alone, which meant lots of fiddling with wires and moving stuff about,  I now have guitar to Pod, and Pod outputting via balanced XLR to 2 Adam A7 (http://www.adam-audio.de/studio/nearfield/a7_data.htm) nearfield active monitors.

The Pod never really sounded good through the Peavy as its a bit old, crackles and hums and along with the way the Pod works the emulation never sounded right. It was the same with the below average Phillips 5.1 speakers.  I can connect my Ipod to the Pods auxillary input too, either to play along with or just for music alone. The difference is stunning.  My next step is a decent mixer with a range of inputs and outputs and I'll connect the TV and Xbox up too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 24, 2008, 08:38:42 PM
Good investment. Are you just mainly interested in recording though? Don't want a proper amp for jamming? Or at least... A powered cabinet or something?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 25, 2008, 06:29:24 AM
Only problem with monitors or monitoring headphones is they have poor low end response.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on February 25, 2008, 11:52:52 AM
I'm limited by my apartment with regards to amps. Anything over volume 1 on just about any amp short of a sub 100 buck toy is too loud. Walls like bloody paper.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 25, 2008, 12:40:52 PM
Couple weeks ago my friend said he heard my amp a half-block away. It was on 6. Only 22W. Yeah, I feel your pain.

I've been using my Boss GT-6 to add some sizzle since I can't crank it up often.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 25, 2008, 01:15:38 PM
I might be technically wrong on this, but in my experience, valve powered amps are just plain louder than solid state. I've had a couple of 40 watters that could drown 100 watt stacks, and keep up with some very hard hitting drummers.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 25, 2008, 01:18:49 PM
I can tell you this; my neighbors hate my 2x15 bass box.  My ampeg head makes my basement shake.  I was playing "Peg" by Steely Dan on bass last night and got a knock on my door at about 10:15pm.  It made my day. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 25, 2008, 01:26:29 PM
Even a modern solid state bass head can get really loud (I mean, they're usually up in the 400-500 watt range), but if you've got one of those old ampeg heads, that's pretty sick.

As for Sky's amp, I've seen people gig with them often. Couldn't say the same, for say, a twenty watt Peavey.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 25, 2008, 01:55:17 PM
Its largely to do with circuit efficiency. Depending on the type of power tubes and the circuit used, a tube amplifier may sound 2-5 times louder than a transistor amplifier of similar wattage. Watts are not a measure of volume, just power handling/consumption. Two different solid-state circuits of 100W each may amplify a source by different amounts at the same gain too. More affordable tube circuits tend to allow for greater sustain than their solid state counterparts. This also adds to a perceived increase in volume.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on February 25, 2008, 09:07:49 PM
I decided to start playing guitar semi-seriously again since I have a nice amp sitting here and someone has mentioned actually getting together and playing cover songs from Guitar Hero on REAL instruments as a parody, so I've re-started a routine again.  I picked up some Bad Religion over the past few days and it's gone pretty well, feeling pretty good.  Then I decided to open back up and re-start the Slayer setlist I used to be able to run through.  I started with a quick one, The Antichrist and remembered all the chord changes and whatnot then I ran it through a few times.  My hands are killing me now.  I am seriously out of practice.  But having a nice amp sure makes up for all the shit sound I used to have back in high school and college, so I don't sound completely terrible (just mostly terrible).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 25, 2008, 10:19:01 PM
I wish I could play Behind the Crooked Cross. Probably the grooviest thing they ever did (as much as Slayer can get into a groove at least). I know how to play it.. Just can't do it for long. Too much downpicking for me. And that's a slower Slayer song!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 26, 2008, 06:44:34 AM
I can tell you this; my neighbors hate my 2x15 bass box.  My ampeg head makes my basement shake.  I was playing "Peg" by Steely Dan on bass last night and got a knock on my door at about 10:15pm.  It made my day. 
I miss my old rig. It was the cheapest thing imaginable, the (solid state) amp was something our singer used to use in rehearsals, but ended up having absolutely sick tone, a Kasino Koncert, iirc. Don't remember the wattage, but through my peavey 2x15 loaded with a couple 400W EV full ranges it was sick. Real loud but tight and punchy.

I've probably mentioned I now have a decent ampeg 8x10, but can't work up the budget to get a decent head for it. And of course, some new pickups for my bass at some point, too. The blues guys from the jam all wish I'd take up bass again, so many guitarists around. That's why I'm trying to work on vocals, because a guitarist + vocals is way more desirable (and fun), and gives the house band a break from singing. So you're hearing more bass in my recordings as I learn some blues lines (at least more authentic than Geezer lines like I played in Thrill is Gone, heh).

Downpicking. Mine is sad these days. Back in the mid-80s when I was still playing guitar and we were doing thrash...I was a downpicking monster, although the other guy in my band was a genetic freak of precise timing, so I always worked syncopated stuff around that. I remember some local guitarists that tried to sit in with us once Metallica got big, everyone loved to cover Master. We played it double time, heh. Was cool and punky. Trying to downpick it at album speed is just beyond what I can sustain now, I can do some short sections but the verse sections break down. And that's a pretty slow downpicked song imo (at least, the album version).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 07, 2008, 10:50:14 AM
Just saw these guys. Wish I had grabbed a vid of their opening suite of Bach stuff (Bach is my favorite composer by far).

Went home and played my entire book of Bach Inventions. Fiancee was happy, she asked me "How many people do you think got a third set of guitar tonight?" :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5S1MQeCsnAE


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 07, 2008, 10:58:57 PM
Ok, I'm sure this has been covered, but maybe not in these exact terms, so whatever.

I'm thinking about picking up the axe again after 15 years. My old guitar was stolen years ago, so recommend a good model for me to grab that doesn't cost a fortune. I'm a big fan of the Les Paul Cherry Sunburst if that give you any indication of the style I'm looking for. I'd say my budget tops out at around a grand.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on March 07, 2008, 11:48:15 PM
I'm thinking about picking up the axe again after 15 years.
I would personally just go around to various pawn shops in the area and play what they have and buy the cheapest guitar that you like that doesn't have major issues like a warped neck or broken tuners.  If you stick with it and enjoy it afterwards, then look into getting a newer guitar.  My favorite guitar is this one:

(http://www.slyagent.com/geetar.jpg)

which I picked up at a pawn shop for $50.  It plays better and feels nicer than almost every higher end guitar I've played in the music shops.  It was darn well worth it to wait despite the fact that everyone gives me shit about how awful it looks.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 08, 2008, 06:47:44 AM
Try out the Epiphone Les Pauls. But really, I found the best bet is to hit the local music stores and play everything. Everything! I went in expecting to buy a strat and now I'm a total Gibson SG convert. Well, 61 reissue convert, most SGs suck.

I'm still kicking myself for not buying the limited edition run of 400 black with gold hardware 61 reissues. Grr, damn you, self!

Boom ka-blam: linky (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/navigation/epiphone-guitars-basses-accessories-solid-body-electric-guitars?N=100001+306241+200990)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 08, 2008, 11:14:14 AM
If you're willing to spend just under a grand, you've opened a lot of options for yourself. No offense to Selby, but I generally wouldn't recommend pawn shops though. Used guitar shops are better. It's very possible to find a used cherryburst LP in one of them -- and not get fucked in the process.

Or like Sky said, check out some of the Epi's (it's basically Gibson's "budget" brand). Some of the more expensive $1k range Epi's are using better materials than the cheaper $1k range Gibsons. They're equipped with some of the better woods and parts that Gibson uses in it's best guitars, but cheap because they're assembled overseas.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on March 08, 2008, 11:19:38 AM
Used guitar shops are better.
Naturally, but the hardest part I had was growing up in a town without one.  There were 2 music shops that sold guitars and entry level price was $800 for an acoustic.  As a 15 year old who wanted to learn to play, that was cost prohibitive from a practical and realistic standpoint ($800 just to find out I dislike it?).  Plus the people that worked there were douchebags who ridiculed your playing style and guitar choices if it didn't match theirs.  I preferred pawn shops because the people left me alone and I took a friend who knew guitars and what to look for with me who said "this is a problem" or "this can be fixed easily."  I always forget that bigger cities have used music shops that may actually contain helpful people ;-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 08, 2008, 11:30:12 AM
Fair enough!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 12, 2008, 06:25:18 AM
Motherfucker. I've finally got the "hybrid picking" part down on White Wedding -- but now I can't transition the volume right when he starts striking chords afterwards.  :uhrr:

Such a simple song, but playing it the way he does requires some subtle picking mastery.

On another Stevens' note, I found this track : Link (http://www.playcast.ru/uploads/2008/01/07/439651.mp3)

Kinda corny sounding, yes... But pretty cool playing. I thought the beginning was a synth at first.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miasma on March 12, 2008, 12:33:41 PM
Gibson gets into the predatory patent game. (http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-activision-gibson.html)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on March 13, 2008, 01:55:25 PM
Gibson gets into the predatory patent game. (http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-activision-gibson.html)

That's a particularly stupid lawsuit. They were in partnership with Activision for years on GH, there's prior art in form of some of the Japanese Bemani games, and the patent itself doesn't resemble GH at all.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 17, 2008, 02:56:29 AM
Lol, before I begin, yes, I'm still on a Steve Stevens kick. Just at the right time, I guess.. A lot of interviews are popping up, since he just released a new album.

I mentioned awhile back that the shit that really gets me about him are those cool little riffs he does on the top strings. In the case of White Wedding, I found this bit really interesting:

Quote
I just want to pull out one last bit about Billy here. “White Wedding”, your rhythm on the verses is different. The accents seem so strange but they’re perfect.

Well that was really influenced by a…there was a band in New York that Billy and I used to go see and it was called, Suicide. And it was a singer/keyboard player; it was only two people on stage. It was the keyboard player was Marty Rev and the singer was Allen Vega. And Allen was sort of this weird kinda Elvis, like this out-of-space Elvis Puerto Rican guy and Marty Rev would play the bass lines with his left hand and then he’d do these keyboard stabs against it. And I remember they had this song called, “The Ghost Rider,” and it had these kinda staccato dotted 1/8th rhythm to it and I thought it was so cool. When we were working on “White Wedding” I said, “What if I do like a Marty Rev idea with the guitar?” and that’s that guitar figure that comes in on the second verse, so I think I was looking at keyboard parts more than guitar parts.

That's the shit.. I never would have guessed he was copping Suicide! (Just for reference: Ghost Rider (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a224CkygvR4))


Anyhow, I got that song down now on acoustic. Hybrid picking and all. I'm so proud of myself.  :-) I haven't actually sat down and learned new techniques in a long time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 18, 2008, 06:48:51 AM
Cool, man! New techniques are so tough when you've got a solid comfort zone. I'm working on the old classical fingerstyle, with all bass strings played by the thumb, I find it very difficult. I'm using the opening melody chords of Sleepwalk (Santo & Johnny, I'm doing the Setzer version (http://youtube.com/watch?v=CMJOPno3jWY)), fingerpicking rather than raking/muting. Great song to play for the fiancee when she lays down for a nap or at bedtime. Funny watching the old Setzer video, he plays it so much smoother and confidently now.

I've also started working on Devil Went Down to Georgia, it's nowhere near as tough as I thought it'd be. Just one of those songs I know from my youth that has a magic appeal of zomgtough fast playing.

As always, memorizing the parts is way harder than actually playing them, for me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 18, 2008, 07:08:25 AM
Sleepwalk is one of my favorites. I don't play it like Setzer, but I've always liked playing it without a slide, as he does. The difference is that he chords everything, which is cool, but I prefer to drop the chords after the intro and play the leads by themselves. I like the sound of the original Santo and Johnny version, but since it takes two guitarists, I just compensate with a lot of feedback!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 18, 2008, 08:23:35 AM
I'm really trying to focus in on chording, too. So it works out well. I'm doing a lot of exercises like only using three strings and trying to invert chords to fit in different positions and stuff. It's tough as hell and half the time I feel like I'm barely making sense....but it works out and sounds great. Good mental exercise, though I need to concentrate more on notes and names rather than shapes and numbers.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 19, 2008, 06:34:51 AM
I don't think I'll ever truly think in notes. Not to say I don't care about musical arrangements making sense.. I do, of course... But it's just more of an intuitive thing. I know the basics, and the rest of my musical sense is just garnered from all of the listening I do. I'm not sure what thinking in notes would change? To me, what really determines your sound is simply what's influencing you. Not necessarily an understanding of theory. And I don't mean just the stuff that I like, but also the stuff that I hate too!  :-P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 19, 2008, 11:16:01 AM
Yeah, but theory allows you the freedom to go beyond a few memorized riffs and really open up to playing what you hear inside.

That's where a lot of jazz starts to fall down, when it becomes theory and technique for it's own sake (I won't even get into deconstructionism).

But for me, playing around with theory allows me to play in any position comfortably and to try out new chord shapes to keep the very basic style of music I play fresh and interesting, without getting in the way of the passion that is integral to the style.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 19, 2008, 01:12:36 PM
Yeah, I hear ya on that. I could use a little more understanding, just for the sake of transitioning well in different positions, etc.. I guess I'm just saying that it's not really a starting point for me as far as composing goes (sounds like you're saying the same thing). Usually when I hear someone who writes from their heavy understanding of theory and technical prowess, then it sounds lifeless.

Although... Every once in awhile, a guy comes along (say, Randy Rhoads) who has both elements in spades. Nothing to be mocked at all!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on March 19, 2008, 08:11:33 PM
So, anyone have problems with their finger tips splitting open and bleeding every now and again?  I never used to have this problem when I played for hours on end, but ever since I've been playing more regularly I noticed that every other week or so I split a finger tip playing and it hurts like hell for 3-4 days before I can play again.  Any advice for how to better care for my fingers?  My guitar instructor was a classical guitarist and said there was an art to maintaining your fingers as well as your technique, but he died before I could find out what he meant by that.

And for the record I am not playing that much or that hard, just an hour or two every other day or so.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 19, 2008, 11:58:36 PM
My guitar instructor was a classical guitarist and said there was an art to maintaining your fingers as well as your technique, but he died before I could find out what he meant by that.

Hah! Man, I'm sorry, but that's pretty funny. It sounds like the plot to Dragonslayer. Or dozens of kung-fu flicks.  :wink:


Anyways, I've never had the problem of bleeding per se, but I suggest that you simply keep trying to play as much as possible. Play more, not less. Eventually you'll develop callouses and toughen up.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 21, 2008, 07:00:05 AM
Where, exactly? Nail bed, pad? Nail bed is from heavy bending, and it's awful...and nothing you can really do about it except superglue it shut. I call that procedure 'The SRV'. Splitting on the actual pads is odd. Are your calluses healthy or all gnarly? Mine can get pretty gnarly because my fiancee refuses to do dishes (and I do all the cooking  :oh_i_see:), if I play guitar with the calluses moist it wreaks havoc on them. When I was unloading trucks, I always had to moisturize them because the cardboard sucked all the moisture out and that's really the only time I've ever had anything with bleeding on my left fingers.

I'd say it's probably best to stop playing until the splits heal or you'll exacerbate the wound.

On my right hand, I'm used to that being a mess. I don't play enough bass to keep it properly callused, so I always get blisters. Played some metal bass with some guys about 6 or 7 years ago and my middle and index fingers blistered, broke open, and bled all over the place. I kept playing. I did feel bad about the bass...since it was borrowed and bloody. So metal, though. Didn't hurt until after we got done playing, I get a wicked adrenaline high when I play.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on March 21, 2008, 06:28:47 PM
Nail bed once (OUCH, took like 2 weeks to heal).  Mostly just the pad.  It's only on my ring finger, never the index or middle (or pinky, but it isn't used all of the time and is the wimpiest).  They are pretty healthy and decent on all fingers except my ring.  It's all funky-fied and cratered (which is odd) and there isn't a ton of sensation in the tip of it compared to the rest of my fingers (except when you know, it's split open and bleeding).  It's healed and I can play again, but it sure is strange.

I do all of the dishes too.  I also work with transformer oil alot and rubbing alcohol\arctic silver on a regular basis recently.  I have thought about moisturizing, but I'm not sure if that would help or make the situation worse.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 24, 2008, 10:42:28 AM
Learned the bulk of Stray Cat Strut sunday. I wasn't concentrating on learning it so much as analyzing the solo section, so I still have a few fills to actually learn...but I tend to like to learn the thought behind the fill and just throw my own in, less to remember. Setzer is a goddamned master, just picking apart the way he sets up solos, so simple yet so elegant. It reminded me of our talk about theory, he's a great example of theory serving the song rather than the reverse.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 24, 2008, 12:08:44 PM
Yeah, he's a very knowledgeable/technical player too... But beautifully simplistic as well.

I never tried learning that one (uh, except the rhythm I guess). I should try that.

[edit] On another note, I need a new acoustic. I'm mainly playing my classical now, because the steel string sucks. It doesn't have a wide enough neck. This is what I've learned with all of this fingerstyle playing I've been doing. I didn't realize that so many fingerstylers are using wide necks this whole time either.. No wonder why they're good.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 24, 2008, 12:29:04 PM
Yeah, I need a nylon string something fierce. My steel acoustic really needs a new shim in the bridge, so I've mostly been playing the Baby Taylor for my acoustic stuff. My fingerstyle is partly inspired by my classic training from school, partly from my horrid technique from after school (a mishmash that I adopted just to play songs we were writing, many broken 'rules'), and the inspiration of Conrado Garcia, one of my favorite musicians. He's from Chile and plays in a traditional style, kind of a flamenco. I asked him for tips on certain passages he played and he laughed and said "I just play the way I need to play....don't think about it" So that's what I'm doing, trying to use my previous training while forgetting about it. Kind of hard to explain. But a wider stringing would benefit the single-note runs that are basically from my bass playing style.

Listening to Iron Maiden on Saturday, blisters on my right index finger from my bass. But I can still pump some of that stuff out, I love it. Two songs til blister, and the middle finger didn't actually raise a blister!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 24, 2008, 12:45:30 PM
Listening to Iron Maiden on Saturday, blisters on my right index finger from my bass. But I can still pump some of that stuff out, I love it. Two songs til blister, and the middle finger didn't actually raise a blister!

I need to start playing Number of the Beast again.  Some nice bass work through that song.  Very straightforward, but fun to play.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 24, 2008, 01:23:33 PM
Two songs to blister were: The Trooper and Revelations. The Trooper was one of my warm-up and practice songs. I had it on a tape looped over and over and would play one side of the tape to build my triplets. One tune I've always meant to learn was Rime of the Ancient Mariner, one of my favorite maiden tunes. But what got me pumped up Saturday was the album Iron Maiden, not the Bruce stuff. Don't have much on CD, just Iron Maiden and Live After Death. I'm ashamed to admit it!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 24, 2008, 01:37:07 PM
Yeah, I like that album. Phantom of the Opera  :rock:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 04, 2008, 12:15:51 PM
I haven't picked up  an instrument of any sort in weeks. Just thought I would share. :x


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 04, 2008, 12:22:25 PM
BOO ON RAPH!  :angryfist: All work and no play sucks!

I've been wanting to make my live debut for a couple months now, but circumstances are kicking my ass. Haven't been to an open mic this year, iirc. Maybe in Jan? Don't remember, don't think so. I think the last one was December, it's a massive jam and fund-raiser.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 04, 2008, 03:44:50 PM
I re-remembered how to play Over The Hills And Far Away by Zeppelin the other night.  Amazing how quickly it comes back when you just glance over the tab and make a few run throughs.  I used to play it all from memory without missing a beat.  I used to be good dammit, what happened?  Oh yeah, I went to college for 6 years after deciding that music would never be a good money maker.  I've even taught myself 3-4 songs over the last few weeks too just for fun and I'm amazed at how easy it is becoming again.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Cadaverine on April 04, 2008, 06:31:38 PM
Stupid newb guitar player question incoming.

Since reading this thread has rekindled my urge to learn to play guitar, along with watching black snake moan, I went out, got a guitar, and have been practicing scales, and such.

Anywho, I've noticed that I tend to "fat finger" things a good bit, particularly chords. It just seems that my fingers tend to overlap, and touch other strings unless I really concentrate on it, to the point of having to bend the strings away from each other a bit while contorting my hand in new and unusual ways.  Is this par for the course as a newb, or is it just the guitar, which is just a cheap Burton for learning purposes, or my fingers just to thick, and I am just SOL, or some combination of the three.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on April 04, 2008, 07:09:00 PM
I doubt you're SOL.  I've seen guys with fingers as big as a side of beef fingertap.

I assume your problems come when you try to play the same fret on adjacent strings.  One solution with big fingers is to stagger your fingers a bit, sort of like a stair case instead of a straight vertical line.  You can buzz if you get too far from the fret bar, but you just have to press a little harder.  In other cases you can bar instead of using a finger per string, meaning you use the side of one finger to fret a bunch of adjacent strings.  About half the guitar players I know bar E minor and A major chords, for example.  The trick here is avoiding barring the other strings, although you can be sloppy with chords generally and it won't cause problems.  Another option is getting a guitar with a wider neck.  Classicals tend to have much wider necks.  But then you need to deal with more stretching and finger yoga to make up for it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 05, 2008, 11:28:45 AM
Could be just newb problems... Not sure. My hands are big too, but I don't run into quite the same problems (can't recall if I ever did). I do know that I do some things weird... Like how I finger power chords --- with my index and pinky, instead of index and ring finger.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 05, 2008, 07:40:38 PM
I do power chords with my index and then ring and pinky.  Gives middle finger the chance to do something crazy from time to time and more control over what the other two strings are sounding.  And I''ve got extremely long fingers (not overly fat, but just long) so I've had this problem whenever I learn new finger positions or new songs using strange positioning compared to what I am used to.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 07, 2008, 06:03:42 AM
Yeah, you probably just need to learn what works for you. I've got short fingers with wide tips, so I don't do a whole lot high on the neck and the open A chord is a stone bitch for me (actually that chord shape in any position is difficult). I usually just bar it. Only chord I really have trouble with, but not much I can do - simply a limitation of genetics.

Not nearly as bad as having short fingers on a bass, that was tough, way more movement than necessary.

I fake the solo in Over the Hills. On a bootleg, Ottawa Sunshine, Page plays the high part at the end of the beginning section (the part just before the band kicks in) over the space between the verses. So I do that sometimes. Watching Page live is great, you can really get a feel for his intention for a song, which parts are written and which are to be jammed (most).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 07, 2008, 07:31:34 PM
...and the open A chord is a stone bitch for me
If I have a bad night with it, I lay down my middle finger on the 4 & 3 string and use the ring for the 2.  Terrible form, but it works sometimes.  I really try and stagger the fingers to get them all on the fret without having interference, but I usually mute one of them on accident.  Just more things to practice.

Watching Page live is great, you can really get a feel for his intention for a song, which parts are written and which are to be jammed (most).
All of the people I have ever played with refused to even think about covering a Zep song.  It's some "sacred ground" that absolutely has to be played perfectly every time to be worthy of Page's honor.  Anything less is heresy.  I always ask if they ever heard Zeppelin live or saw how Page plays, but they say it doesn't matter.  Hell, the 2-3 live albums I have of theirs, half the songs have a consistent basic structure and various licks and solo changes that are completely different than the album version.  And it all works.  Purists can really annoy me sometimes (I've probably bitched about this before).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 08, 2008, 06:23:08 AM
Not to mention Page was often wicked sloppy. I didn't like him when I was a kid, for that reason. I can definitely appreciate it now, though.

Purists, bah. I ignore 'em, you can't really win them over to an improvisational mindset if they're not there already. Why not just hire a DJ? One thing I was working on a while ago was taking Clapton's shitty mid-career rock stuff and forging it into delta/chicago blues ala muddy. After Midnight lyrics over Catfish Blues music. Stuff like that is fun.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 08, 2008, 06:37:39 AM
If you want to appreciate Page, just listen to Satriana, Malmsteen, and Dream Theater.  Yes, those other guys are technically clean but it sure does get sterile and boring after a while.  Page and Clapton I can listen to for hours. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 08, 2008, 07:31:57 AM
There's a Satch concert that's been doing the rounds on the HD circuit. He has moments (Satch Boogie), but for the most part it's almost laughable. Dream Theater I haven't listened to a ton of, but I haven't liked anything I've heard. Malmsteen also has moments of greatness (Black Star).

Clapton is ok, I liked him a lot more before I got into the blues deeply. I like his Mayall stuff, the Yardbirds stuff, but that's a bit...I dunno, spastic? All the sped-up blues the brits did. My favorite Clapton album is From the Cradle, I also like his Johnson tribute.

But I lean more towards Muddy, who has always surrounded himself with great players. Buddy Guy is great, his phrasing and spontaneity is still amazing (and he turns 72 this year iirc). Otis Rush, Junior Wells on harp. So many great blues players, and it's almost never about technicality, it's all technique and feel. Bends, vibrato, phrasing rather than a scale lexicon and speed. Some of the later cats like Luther Allison and Son Seals are badass, too. Then you can crawl back to the acoustic era and really get blown away by guys like Big Bill Broonzy. To me, they're still the best. I remember reading in a blues history book written in the 60s, talking about the transition to electric around WW2. The electric bands had a real difficult time meshing with the old-timers because the acoustic guys wouldn't leave any room for them to play. Their feet were the percussion, they played the bass, rhythm and melody lines and sang. And loud enough to be heard over a bar-room full of people.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on April 08, 2008, 08:13:27 AM
Add Steve Vai to the list of technical guitarists to sleep through. Not that all technical guitarists are yawn inducing - Robert Fripp is one of the most accomplished guitarists alive, and yet he manages to remain interesting no matter what band or solo thing he's up to. Likewise John McLaughlin. Steve Howe and Allan Holdsworth are somewhere in the middle and can captivate or bore depending on what they do. But yes, there are many more proficient guitarists that are great enough players and who are incredible entertainers. I wouldn't put Ritchie Blackmore, Jimmy Page, Brian May, The Edge or even Jeff Beck into the same league technically as virtuosos such as Fripp or Howe, but they're certainly among the 'best' guitarists as far as this listener is concerned.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 08, 2008, 09:07:49 AM
It seems a lot of jazz players get lured down the technical path, too. There's always been something about jazz I don't care for, yet my favorite guitarist is probably Setzer, who I'd put squarely in the jazz vein. But he knows how to keep music as the most important element and let his technicality serve the song, rather than wankers who think the song is just a backdrop for their technicality.

I guess that goes into jam music, too. Though I'm all about extended improvisation these days, I don't like most jam bands. The songs suck and are just wankery excuses. But throw on some Allman Brothers, where the jamming is in the context of a great song with killer hooks, and it works great. My current favorite 'jam' album is Fleetwood Mac's Live in Boston (http://www.amazon.com/Live-Boston-Dig-Fleetwood-Mac/dp/B00007FZGA/). I've had it a couple years now and I never get tired of it. Peter Green and Kirwin pwn.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 08, 2008, 11:44:51 AM
I still contend that the only people that enjoy true jazz music are the ones playing it. 

I'll second the Fleetwood Mac recommendation. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 08, 2008, 04:39:16 PM
Heavier gauge strings help for detuning but it really depends on how much I play open C tuning and use 0.11 on my leccy guitars. Jimi used to downtune a half step(correction made by stray) and use heavyish strings for a more gritty tone. but I presume you might be talking for metal and be downtuning a couple or more octaves. Also if you have a floating bridge I hear it can cause some problems (I reluctantly removed mine from my strat cause I write a lot of music in open tunings.)

Also my contention is the majority of people are happy to hear guitarists who play with a bit of feel and pizazz over someone who is lightning fast, its a form of expression not motor car racing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 08, 2008, 05:09:48 PM
Jimi just downtuned a half step, @ Eb. He played normal .010's and .011's. He used an Octavio for getting those weird sounds (and it was an "octave up", not octave down pedal). You can't even downtune an octave on a guitar, no matter how big your strings. Can't even do it on a B baritone (.70-ish gauge) well either. You need a true baritone, which is closer to a bass than a guitar.

[edit] Umm... If you're having trouble playing in C on a strat, then first off get another spring (usually they only come with 3). Or at the very least, tighten the spring tension more. You don't need to hardtail it. Then give your truss rod a quarter clockwise turn, just a little more stiffness. Helps to get a mix-matched string set as well -- like a .010-.060. Your small E string doesn't need to be .011 necessarily (unless you want it to, which is cool), but you're better off with fatter low E and A strings. For the sake of convenience, GHS makes a Zakk Wylde set that's 10-60 gauge. E is 60, A is 52. Would work well whether you're in Open C or drop C.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on April 08, 2008, 07:31:39 PM
My current favorite 'jam' album is Fleetwood Mac's Live in Boston (http://www.amazon.com/Live-Boston-Dig-Fleetwood-Mac/dp/B00007FZGA/). I've had it a couple years now and I never get tired of it. Peter Green and Kirwin pwn.

Excellent album. My current favorites include Man's Be Good To Yourself At Least Once A Day (http://www.amazon.com/Good-Yourself-Least-Once-Day/dp/B0000011LA) and Mountain's Twin Peaks (http://www.amazon.com/Twin-Peaks-Mountain/dp/B00000252J). 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 08, 2008, 07:59:03 PM
Jimi just downtuned a half step, @ Eb. He played normal .010's and .011's. He used an Octavio for getting those weird sounds (and it was an "octave up", not octave down pedal). You can't even downtune an octave on a guitar, no matter how big your strings. Can't even do it on a B baritone (.70-ish gauge) well either. You need a true baritone, which is closer to a bass than a guitar.

[edit] Umm... If you're having trouble playing in C on a strat, then first off get another spring (usually they only come with 3). Or at the very least, tighten the spring tension more. You don't need to hardtail it. Then give your truss rod a quarter clockwise turn, just a little more stiffness. Helps to get a mix-matched string set as well -- like a .010-.060. Your small E string doesn't need to be .011 necessarily (unless you want it to, which is cool), but you're better off with fatter low E and A strings. For the sake of convenience, GHS makes aZakk Wylde set that's 10-60 gauge. E is 60, A is 52. Would work well whether you're in Open C or drop C.

Yeh ur right half step is what I meant actually my terminology isn't great being kinda self taught or from just watching others. Needed to switch tunings quickly playing live sometimes and hence had to put a shaped wooden block against the springs (no truss rod for me til I get that back to normal). Was playing live with 3/4 different tunings and didn't have enough guitars to pass around so was best option at the time & tbh I don't do much truss rod work so not suffering for it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 08, 2008, 08:12:36 PM
Add Steve Vai to the list of technical guitarists to sleep through.
Steve Vai... is one of those guitarists who I only liked one aspect of their work, that of his time with Zappa.  His solo work is yawn inducing for me, even if it is technically brilliant at times.

Steve Howe did some amazing work on several Yes albums, but alot of it is just... so uninspiring.  I mean so much of it gets lost in the mix of keyboards and flutes and other wacky stuff it makes it hard for me to take it seriously.  My guitar instructor worshipped Steve Howe and could play any song he ever put to record.

Dream Theatre... ugh.  I bought one album of theirs that was supposedly their "best" at the time.  I couldn't believe how boring it was.  I pretty much don't buy albums based on "sounds like artist X, Y" that most music links try and put together, because they suck ;-)

My favorite guitarist are always ones who aren't recognized as "geniuses" or "virtuosos" but people whose playing I just admire.  A good punk record can be more enjoyable than some of the most technically proficient and well played guitar work in my opinion.  A good song is a good song regardless of genre.  Technical wankery minus a good song is just technical wankery.  Put a good song with it and keep the wanking to the song's structure and you have a recipe for delight.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 08, 2008, 09:50:35 PM
Yeh ur right half step is what I meant actually my terminology isn't great being kinda self taught or from just watching others. Needed to switch tunings quickly playing live sometimes and hence had to put a shaped wooden block against the springs (no truss rod for me til I get that back to normal). Was playing live with 3/4 different tunings and didn't have enough guitars to pass around so was best option at the time & tbh I don't do much truss rod work so not suffering for it.

Ah yeah, I have the same problem sometimes (lots of tunings, not enough guitars).

Truss rods... Yeah, you can screw up a guitar big time if you don't know what you're doing.. But like I said, little quarter turns are the key. If you don't see a difference after a couple of days, then do another quarter turn. As long as you know that, you're a-ok. People who screw up their necks turn multiple rounds, not realizing what a dramatic difference that makes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 09, 2008, 06:10:24 AM
NEED MOAR GEETARS :)

I need to make a winter shim for my Alvarez acoustic. It's been sitting in the closet with the first string unplayable all winter. Still frets out on bends around the 10-13 on the 1st string, it's pretty cheap and the fretboard humps a little over the body connection :| Anyway, it's playable now and I love it because it has a built-in tuner. Only time I play the Rain Song is when that guitar is 'in season'.

I've also mentioned I keep my old crappy electric around with the action raised very high to play slide on. I need to learn an easy memory trick for transitioning from open G to open E/D. I love open G for the old Muddy Waters/delta stuff but Allmans/Trucks and a lot of other more modern stuff uses open E. And then there's later era Muddy/Margolin/Haynes slide in standard tuning...but I bash the shit out of the slide and don't want to mess up my beloved SG with it...

NEED MOAR GEETARS!!!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 09, 2008, 09:58:16 AM
I don't play slide much in open G either. Really like Open E though. I have no idea how those dudes played slide in standard.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 09, 2008, 11:32:43 AM
Lots of chord fragments. Problem with open tunings is learning scale positions and chord fragments. I find it very limiting to do anything beyond some basic riffs in open tunings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 09, 2008, 01:16:38 PM
Ah yeah, I have the same problem sometimes (lots of tunings, not enough guitars).

Truss rods... Yeah, you can screw up a guitar big time if you don't know what you're doing.. But like I said, little quarter turns are the key. If you don't see a difference after a couple of days, then do another quarter turn. As long as you know that, you're a-ok. People who screw up their necks turn multiple rounds, not realizing what a dramatic difference that makes.

I got a guitar tech to do it to be on the safe side its an  1954 anniversary USA strat I wasn't goin messin with it cost me enough but worth every penny love it.

One thing about open tunings is that G C and D all have the same chord shapes except you move a string across C G D (in that order) same for the slide licks.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 09, 2008, 01:37:02 PM
Cool. Is that one of the masterbuilt ones?

Anyhow, it's easy. Unless your tech is doing it for free, it's good to know this stuff. I am/used to be a guitar tech btw. Trust me. Muhaha  :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 09, 2008, 11:35:09 PM
It has the original contour body and the original machine heads but I don't think its a masterbuild is there somewhere I can check it? Its one of the nicest guitars I've ever picked up much less to own it  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 10, 2008, 12:13:28 AM
I don't know about limited Custom Shop models if that's what it is, but masterbuilt guitars usually have a decaled name of the builder on the back of the headstock.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 10, 2008, 01:14:45 AM
Right it ain't masterbuilt that would have been a bonus. Playing slide in standard tuning ain't so bad cause you know most of the positions already although if you mean solo slide players playing in standard then I have no clue how that could be done.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 10, 2008, 06:30:27 AM
Well, playing a C, G or a D isn't very difficult with a slide in open tunings. Playing a C, G7 and Am in the same tuning...not so easy.

There's never enough time to play guitar imo. Here's a guy who knows how to play properly in open G:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=pJQNiYQqmIQ

I like the version Johnny Winter does on Hard Again, it swings a lot more. Keb Mo did a nice version on the Tribute to Muddy PBS special, real snap on the A#, which Margolin said Muddy always used to bust his balls about (not snapping it hard enough).

Playing around watching the Keb Mo clip again, I noticed a pretty hot related link:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=0891fMsvBy4

I need to learn that tune bluesy like that! Most need to learn open G better and get an independent thumb. My thumb/bass lines are always my weakest thing with acoustic blues. Back when I linked my first recorded slide tune (Can't Be Satisfied) here, the bass was awful, uneven and frenetic.

Since I'm posting links, here's one of the tunes I have pretty well under the belt and want to debut at the blues jam assuming I ever make it to another one :P http://youtube.com/watch?v=8MlHxDsaWMU


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 10, 2008, 07:44:54 AM
Ha nice links not really listened to much keb mo but very cool must get more of his stuff. Open D is great for practicing thumbwork the 6th string (E) is your bass lines and you if you have the thumbpick (Im a leftie so I have to order mine in :( ) You can get some real nice snapping going on.


Went to see this guy last year hes techinically awesome slide playin. Probably playing slide since he was 3 years old.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=3hMIdxb_pYY&feature=related


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 10, 2008, 08:56:56 AM
The location of the root isn't the problem, it's my problem of not being able to play two things independently. Not sure I'll ever surmount it, it's the same reason I'll never be a good drummer, I can't keep a steady hi-hat while playing syncopation on the drums. I also don't use thumb or fingerpicks, I originally learned to play classical style and then my fingerwork was honed during the years I played bass.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 10, 2008, 11:58:51 AM
I just like open E/D for the bluesy slide riffs, and Open G for rock riffs or folky stuff. If I could play blues in G more, I would. I can kind of fake an RJ style, but it's buzzy and sketchy. So much plucking. I think this goes to what I saying awhile back about fingerstyles -- I need a wider neck. I play that stuff better on a classical, but it needs a steel sound. Besides, nylon sounds like shit with a slide. Once I get a new steel string though, I'm gonna try to improve it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on April 11, 2008, 12:40:15 PM
You can't even downtune an octave on a guitar, no matter how big your strings. Can't even do it on a B baritone (.70-ish gauge) well either. You need a true baritone, which is closer to a bass than a guitar.


The current Metal solution to down tuning is add more strings. Dino Cazares talks about it extensively in this Ibanez 8 string promo. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-tIw6XAuPA)

There's a track on Meshuggah's Nothing album that used a detuned 7 string to BbO.






Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 11, 2008, 04:50:33 PM
The current Metal solution to down tuning is add more strings.
And yet half of these bands still can't write a tune to save their life.  Blast beats and de-tuned 1 finger races up the fretboard combined with gutteral groans or tough guy screams.  Just a tad one-dimensional...  Adding one more string to the mix isn't going to make up for writing boring songs!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on April 11, 2008, 05:20:38 PM
That's okay, listen to the other half of the bands. Meshuggah's mesmeric polyrhythms and instrumental interplay is anything but boring.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 11, 2008, 06:35:11 PM
Messhugah's cool. Drummer is sick.

I'm just confused on how they'd get a 7 string to "BbO" -- assuming you mean Bb, but a full octave down? A standard 7 string tuning starts off in a low B. So do you just mean they tune down half a step to Bb? Because as far as I can tell, getting a full octave down seems impossible. The neck isn't long enough -- and B is already low to begin with.

Besides that, Bb but an octave lower would just be the 6th fret of the low E on a standard 4 string bass. I mean, if you want an octave lower, then just play a bass! If it's the feel/thickness of bass strings you're concerned about, then play something like a Fender Bass VI (or Schecter's Hellcat VI). You can riff quite well on them (a lot of Cure songs use them, to give an example).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on April 11, 2008, 08:18:56 PM
I think you're right - just standard Bb:

http://www.deadtide.com/interviews/page.php?id=41


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on April 12, 2008, 06:54:06 AM
Ah i confess to reading about the BbO tuning elsewhere. I just know it's looooow.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 12, 2008, 07:27:36 AM
Messhugah's cool. Drummer is sick.
Minus their vocals, I have to agree that their earlier stuff is pretty cool.  I haven't listened to anything they've done since 2002 or so, so I can't really comment.  My problem is more with the lame opening bands I have to suffer through opening good metal bands ;-)  That and Hatebreed.  I don't see why they are worshipped so and I've seen them live twice.  Tons of energy and decent stage presence... just every song sounds the same and does not excite me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on April 12, 2008, 08:33:57 AM
Here you go, have fun:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jIf6Z4cOQSA&feature=related

I'm still practicing with the bass, Paul McCartney makes me angry.  RELAX MAN.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 12, 2008, 11:08:29 PM
Did the Taylor factory tour on Friday. The T5 is sweet, didn't get to try any of the new solidbody models, none were in the visitor center. Did get to see some of the Builder's Reserve half-built. All of them preordered going back to January.

Tonight saw David Wilcox live. He does nutso tunings. BTW, on one of his songs he drilled a larger hole in the tuner to string a bass string thru there, and tuned it down a full octave below whatever it was at.

Peter Mulvey detunes the low E to an A, or sometimes both of 'em to a GG pair.  For what he's doing he wants the buzzy sound, and frets 'em together. This is actually an F# in the bass, the rest capoed at the 5th fret, I think.

http://www.last.fm/music/Peter+Mulvey/_/If+Love+is+Not+Enough

I did a tune with it that way too, don't have a recording of it though; I actually tuned AADGAD, then capoed the four higher strings at the 7th fret.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 13, 2008, 10:46:02 PM
OK, here's a bit of a trainwreck. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/13/the-sunday-song-polliwog/

200bpm blues jam trainwreck! Whee!  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2008, 12:53:54 AM
Here you go, have fun:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jIf6Z4cOQSA&feature=related

I'm still practicing with the bass, Paul McCartney makes me angry.  RELAX MAN.

Uh, video's dead.

OK, here's a bit of a trainwreck. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/13/the-sunday-song-polliwog/

200bpm blues jam trainwreck! Whee!  :awesome_for_real:

Yes, a bit of a trainwreck.  :wink:

Are all of those real instruments? I can't tell with the drums.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Llava on April 14, 2008, 01:09:33 AM
Here you go, have fun:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jIf6Z4cOQSA&feature=related

I'm still practicing with the bass, Paul McCartney makes me angry.  RELAX MAN.

Uh, video's dead.


Still works for me.

Try this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uWAbyFQxqG8


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2008, 01:18:52 AM
Got it now. Funny. Had to search for what song he was referencing though (don't watch the show much).

[edit] In other news, my classical's tuning pegs are thrashed.  :uhrr: Back to playing my shitty takamine steel string -- which not only sucks now to me because of the neck width, but I can't seem to cure of it intonation issues. It's a piece of shit.

I played a Seagull over the weekend. A $500 range guitar, and it sounded SWEET. I'm surprised. Just a mere vibrato on it sounded like it came out of a much more expensive guitar. Neck width suited fingerstyling as well. I may have to get one of these. I'd rather shell out big for an electric.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 14, 2008, 06:18:01 AM
Quote
OK, here's a bit of a trainwreck. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/13/the-sunday-song-polliwog/

200bpm blues jam trainwreck! Whee!  :awesome_for_real:

Yes, a bit of a trainwreck.  :wink:

Are all of those real instruments? I can't tell with the drums.

The drums are sample loops. The instruments -- Washburn bass, the Melody Maker for the two electric parts, and the Yamaha P70 with a piano VST.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2008, 06:22:09 AM
Well it sounds like you're having fun, trainwreck or not. I don't think you mentioned before that you finally settled on a keyboard (or did you?).. P70 eh?


I must re-mention Seagull. Have you played any of them? Check em out, if you can. You're a discerning acoustic player. I'd like to know anyone else's opinions.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 14, 2008, 07:35:39 AM
I liked some parts of your trainwreck, Raph. Not sure why you jumbled all that together like that, though  :ye_gods: The piano in particular I enjoyed because there a bajillion blues guitarists around, but not many good blues pianists.

I do hate fake drums, though.

Totally jealous you toured Taylor. Want want Taylor classical cutaway. Never played a Seagull.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on April 14, 2008, 08:09:33 AM
I bought a capo to play the Jeff Buckley Hallelujah version, have to look at the tabs a bit more.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2008, 08:34:14 AM
5th fret capo, basically a G shape chord to Em (C to Am in standard). I can't type the tab here, but the intro is based around E->G->A to umm B, then to the main G/Em rhythm.

...

Eh, I'm sure you find something better to explain it! Pretty easy song, except for singing, of course  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 14, 2008, 08:53:32 AM
Quote from: Stray
Well it sounds like you're having fun, trainwreck or not. I don't think you mentioned before that you finally settled on a keyboard (or did you?).. P70 eh?

Yeah, with some venturing into the world of VSTs. The interface on the P70 is terrible for doing anything complex (basically, hold down buttons and press actual keys on the keyboard, while referring to the manual), but it had by far the best keybed of anything I tried -- crushed the M-Audio stuff. But it's not got aftertouch or mod wheels or anything, since it is aimed more at a digital piano. But it sounds really good played by itself. I've been playing it that way for enjoyment, and then for recording I usually run it into VSTs.

Quote
I must re-mention Seagull. Have you played any of them? Check em out, if you can. You're a discerning acoustic player. I'd like to know anyone else's opinions.

I have played Seagulls in stores. They are not bad little guitars. Have made a name for themselves as one of the best choices in an affordable acoustic.

I liked some parts of your trainwreck, Raph. Not sure why you jumbled all that together like that, though  :ye_gods: The piano in particular I enjoyed because there a bajillion blues guitarists around, but not many good blues pianists.

I am NOT a good blues pianist. I am horribly out of practice on piano. I just happen to have this one thing I can still do in F. So I transposed the keyboard so I could play it in F and hear it in the key of E. :)

Far as jumbling it all together -- I was just having fun recording jams one on top of another.  :grin: Plus, setting the pace at 200bpm was not conducive to clean playing. And man, the tone of the second guitar part is awful. :P

Maybe this week I'll do "Polliwog Minus Warts" and try to do it up for real.

Quote
I do hate fake drums, though.

Technically, they are real drums, just in loops.

Quote
Totally jealous you toured Taylor.

Second time I have toured there, actually. Last time was several years ago though. They do tours at 1pm every weekday, just be in the lobby at the right time.

I LOVE Taylor's ES pickup system. It is just amazing. But I have to admit, I have not yet fallen in love with a given Taylor guitar. If I did, I suspect I would suddenly and magically have a multi-thousand dollar hole in my wallet.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 14, 2008, 09:06:38 AM
Quote
Technically, they are real drums, just in loops.
:awesome_for_real:
Quote
Plus, setting the pace at 200bpm was not conducive to clean playing.
Eh, fast boogie goes about that fast. Snot about being clean. Sbout jammin.

I do prefer a real slow burn, though. Was playing a real nice slow minor thing for the fiancee this weekend I wish I had recorded. Haven't recorded shit lately. Lost my focus and been dicking around with a bunch of styles. I did come up with a cool idea for a strummy country version of Can't Be Satisfied, though. I was working on an idea of making the melody line of the slide guitar walk through the middle of simple open chords. Needs work but I like the idea, simple but with some clever bits hidden away.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2008, 10:38:38 AM
Here's a habit you should learn: I keep a little memo recorder by me when I jam. If I come up with something good, I press record and repeat. 90% of the stuff I call "recordings" are in this form -- waiting to be looked at later.

As for really good acoustics: Collings (http://www.collingsguitars.com/). Built in Austin. Good shit. Wish I had the cash.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on April 17, 2008, 07:58:27 PM
Just picked up a Seagull Performer (http://www.seagullguitars.com/productperformermjcwgt.htm) for DADGAD work.  Very pleased.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 17, 2008, 08:23:38 PM
What made you decide on one? Kind of weird that you mentioned it, since I've been looking for more opinions on Seagulls in this thread.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on April 17, 2008, 09:02:14 PM
Neat.  I hadn't read the whole thread.

I wanted a deadnought Acoustic/Electric that had good, heavy mid and low tone in dropped D and DADGAD for Celtic, blues, and bluegrass accompaniment.  I've found quite a few guitars can detune a little or get muddy on the higher frets when they're downtuned even a little.  I played quite a few and found the Seagulls had great sound for the money, especially when plugged in.  Everyone online says the electronics are top notch, and the pickup/internal mic combo lets you switch back and forth from solo fingerpicking to strumming.  It came down to a Performer or a Maritime, and the Performer was on sale, so that's that.  If I wanted to spend more, I might have gone with a Takamine, but this is a great guitar. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 17, 2008, 09:19:40 PM
I can't say that I've played really expensive Takamines, just a couple of midrange ones (and own one as well). A Seagull at the same price is just SO much better to my ears, so I believe you've made the right choice. I need to get one myself. I hate my Takamine, to be honest.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 18, 2008, 05:56:33 AM
I'm starting to hate my Alvarez jumbo. The SG and Baby Taylor spoil me. My fiancee doesn't understand, she's attached to the Alvarez because I bought it just after we started dating. I should've planned ahead and bought a nylon Taylor when I proposed to her  :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Engels on May 02, 2008, 10:43:42 PM
Some fab blues/jazz finger tapping by Stanley Jordan. Dual guitars at around the half way mark (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8DCDrKX4_I)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 12, 2008, 07:59:29 AM
The Polliwog is back!  :uhrr:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/11/the-sunday-song-polliwog-sans-warts/



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 07, 2008, 11:55:54 PM
Best. Guitar. Ever.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y222/Abagadro/Marshall-Guitar-Auction.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on June 10, 2008, 12:48:18 AM
The older takamines were pretty awesome so if you can pick up a second hand one that was made in the 80s you will be happy a lot of the mid range ones now are extremely mass produced. Still not bad though owned a g-series for a while had a really nice soound out of it but it wasn't a nice guitar to play.

I'm looking to buy a firewire soundcard for recording purposes anyone have suggestions? I'll be using ableton live most likely. Don't need a lot of inputs but more than one would be nice.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on June 10, 2008, 09:45:48 AM
Not sure about soundcards specifically, but I've always liked Presonus.

http://www.zzounds.com/item--PRSFSPROJECT


Edit: This (http://www.zzounds.com/item--MTUULTRALITE) appears to be awesome as well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on June 10, 2008, 10:43:57 AM
That MOTU one looks pretty slick, but I forgot to mention my budget is probably only about $300-$350 :S


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 10, 2008, 04:23:04 PM
The older takamines were pretty awesome so if you can pick up a second hand one that was made in the 80s you will be happy a lot of the mid range ones now are extremely mass produced. Still not bad though owned a g-series for a while had a really nice soound out of it but it wasn't a nice guitar to play.

I'm looking to buy a firewire soundcard for recording purposes anyone have suggestions? I'll be using ableton live most likely. Don't need a lot of inputs but more than one would be nice.

Mine's a g-series as well... It has a tolerable sound in recording, I guess, but not from my playing perspective. If that makes sense. But yeah, it plays like shit. Err, or maybe it plays like shit because I can't enjoy the sound when I play. Hah!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on June 10, 2008, 05:47:00 PM
All I have to say is that I just tuned a guitar to C the other night to learn to play Arch Enemy and... man.  Damn that is pretty low.  Makes the guitar sound downright sinister.

Maybe one of you who actually KNOW your guitar tech can help me.  I was given this new lower end Ibanez and it has a funny buzz\vibration when I strike the G string (4th one from the lowest, 3rd highest).  It almost sounds like something rattling\vibrating.  It drives me nuts not playing with an amp turned up to drown it out.  Unfortunately I have no clue as to how to go about getting rid of this noise.  Any geniuses out there who can at least point me in the correct direction?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on June 11, 2008, 04:08:49 AM
There is a few ways you can do it check inside the hole look towards the neck and there should be a small tunnel for adjusting your neck shape with an alan/hex key. Now be very careful with this you can snap your neck if you overdo it but basically your neck could be too straight right now. To increase the bow of you neck it's counterclockwise I believe. An easier & potentially less damaging solution could be to merely fit heavier gauge strings for playing in open tunings you should essentially have really thick strings and hands like dumptrucks. Final way is a good guitar tech but they can cost.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on June 11, 2008, 04:14:18 AM
Here's a decent vid on how to adjust your truss rod/neck.

http://www.expertvillage.com/video/5024_neck-guitar-acoustic.htm (http://www.expertvillage.com/video/5024_neck-guitar-acoustic.htm)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on June 11, 2008, 10:51:57 AM
It's buzzing in standard tuning too right? Adjusting the truss rod would be a brave act for a beginner. I'd see a tech myself.

I'm off to the London International Music Show (http://www.londoninternationalmusicshow.com/) this weekend. Looking forward to seeing Paul Gilbert and Yngwie "You've unleashed the fucking fury" (http://www.blabbermouth.net/yngwie_tokyo_flight.mp3) Malsteem, but the exhibitor list doesn't seem to include any major manufacturers at all. Last year they at least had Gibson, Ibanez and Dean.

It's different this year too, this time they have the bass, drum and classical instrument shows on at the same time. I'm looking forward to trying out a whole bunch of instruments I've never played before.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on June 11, 2008, 05:50:55 PM
It's buzzing in standard tuning too right? Adjusting the truss rod would be a brave act for a beginner. I'd see a tech myself.
Sure is.  Buzzes regardless of tuning, and only on that one string and none of the others.  Buzzing doesn't get any worse in lower tuning either apparently (or at least not that I noticed).  I don't think the truss rod needs adjusting, the neck is decently straight.  I'd still not adjust it myself ;-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 11, 2008, 09:12:03 PM
I second the tech notion.

Does it only buzz when plucked open, or does it buzz when fretted, and at which frets?

If one string buzzes, it is entirely possible that other strings will as well, when fretted elsewhere. I have played guitars that only buzzed when fretted at the 9th fret, for example.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on June 12, 2008, 04:57:49 AM
Does it only buzz when plucked open, or does it buzz when fretted, and at which frets?
Seems to buzz everywhere.  Open, fretted (from 1-~17), etc.  I've run up and down a bit with the other 5 strings and haven't found any places where they buzz, but that doesn't mean they won't...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 16, 2008, 06:02:49 AM
Check the saddle height and also take the string off and inspect the nut slot. Either might be low.

A truss problem would probably affect more than one string, a fret problem might only affect one string, but probably not the entire run.

My alvarez acoustic has an awful fretting problem during the winter months, keep meaning to fix that. I'd really rather buy a new acoustic than spend the money on a tech, though  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 16, 2008, 08:44:11 PM
Took my daughter to a tiny little folk fest held in a local town park. We checked out the Irish fiddling, the craft booths. etc. Then we wandered over to the Open Mike tent, and sat to listen. Some decent performers, but honestly I am probably as good or better. Then they run out of performers, and the emcee starts literally picking people from the audience and putting them on stage. So I did a four-song set and doubled their audience size, with my daughter singing backing vocals. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 16, 2008, 08:47:50 PM
Cool beans, man.  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on June 18, 2008, 10:58:30 AM
The Guitar Show was fun. We got there in time for Paul Gilbert, but the stage was running late so we caught a jam session with Billy Sheehan and Guthrie Govan. Sheehan is really amazing, I've never heard anything like it. I'll forgive him for being OT III, lol. Govan is actually a fellow Essex dweller, and really talented although most of his music is not to my style.

Paul's set was marred by the crew f*cking up his backing tracks, so he just improvised with a few Hendrix songs. Once working he played a couple of fast tunes from his new album, Scarified from his Racer X days and a slower melodic one.

The show itself was ok, I spent most time playing around with different accoustics, there was a hall specialising in accoustic instruments of all sorts. Played most of the big name brands, Taylor, Larrivee, Tanglewood but also ones from UK and European luthiers. My favourite was a cutaway by Patrick James Eggle (http://www.eggle.co.uk/) (7000 USD + !). I also got to play some Spanish guitars, basses, a mandolin, banjo, uke, some lute thing, a cello, lots of Korg synths and pianos, and meet Jim Marshall, who although very old and wheelchair bound, was signing and doing a meet and greet all afternoon. My friends dad met Rick Squire from Yes, and he was over the moon. 

On the way out we caught Yngwie finshing with Far Beyond The Sun, and he always does a great performance of that.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on June 30, 2008, 06:13:09 PM
Sorry for the necro.

My birthday was on Sunday, and my parents decided to buy me a guitar. I've been interested in learning for quite a long time, but never really had the balls to go and pick one up.

The problem is, I really have no idea how to choose one. What I should buy along with it? Does anyone know of a good program for learning? I would go for private lessons, but I'm broke.

I'm leaning towards a nylon-string, maybe a Yamaha C40? I've heard nothing but good things about it.

Please mention anything I'm forgetting about.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 01, 2008, 06:21:57 AM
Why a nylon string? I love them, but they're spaced wider and tough for beginners, even if most schools use them...

I'd say the first thing is the kind of music you intend to play. That will help you figure out the style of guitar, nylons are basically classical and flamenco primarily but Willie Nelson plays one, also.

Secondly, it would really help if you had a guitar-playing friend to help you shop. You definitely need to hit guitar shops, but as a novice, you won't know what to look for and haven't developed a feel for what kind of neck you like.

Thirdly, don't spend a lot of money until you know if you'll stick with it. A few years learning the basics on a cheapo and you will be ready to move up to a mid-range instrument and know what to look for in one.

For instruction, I really like the CAGED method to learn the fretboard. I use this book (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-SE-Reasoning-Arpeggios/dp/0962477060/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1214921872&sr=8-1). You can search on amazon for "fretboard logic", they also have dvds and a big combo box with everything. But the one I linked is the first two books and cheap.

There isn't anything on how to actually play, it's just learning where the chords are and how to find your way around. So you'll need a book or three more specific to the style you want to play. Something like this (http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Rhythm-Guitar-Guide-Blues/dp/1574241389/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1214922094&sr=8-1) or this (http://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Acoustic-Blues-Guitar-Book/dp/0739036734/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1214922138&sr=1-1). Guitar for Dummies (http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Dummies-Lifestyles-Paperback/dp/0764599046/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1214922215&sr=1-1) is also a good general starter.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on July 01, 2008, 10:47:31 AM
Classical is what I am most interested in, that's why I was contemplating a nylon string. Nothing is really set in stone though, if you think that it's a bad choice for a first guitar, I'll think about something else.

I have a friend who owns a guitar, but he doesn't play it much. He plays trombone mainly, I think he just wanted to try something different.

I figured that about $200 bucks was the max I wanted to pay for... Does that sound reasonable?

Thanks for the reply! I'm gonna check those books out.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 01, 2008, 11:17:28 AM
That would probably be a great beginning guitar, then. Don't sweat the blues book links I gave you, that was just examples. But the CAGED method can benefit all guitar players, I love it. Helped me break my mental block on playing all over the neck, though that's something I'm still working through 20 years into my playing :)

It's hard for me to recommend classical guitar books for beginners, Raph will yell at me for recommending advanced stuff :) You can check out the Berklee method books (amazon, search for berklee guitar), that is good for learning positions and notation (I prefer tablature, the true guitar notation). I have a couple nice books that are 'easy' classical, but they aren't very instructive. You probably want to get a couple of each, the CAGED and Berklee stuff for mechanics and a couple of easy songbooks (which is a misnomer).

The 'easy' book (http://www.amazon.com/Easy-Classical-Guitar-Gig-Book/dp/0825628334) I'm working through now is filled with some great stuff, but it doesn't really do any chord charts or anything. I also have a nice book of Bach Inventions that I don't see at amazon, for guitar duet.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 01, 2008, 06:53:36 PM
I figured that about $200 bucks was the max I wanted to pay for... Does that sound reasonable?
I paid $65 for my first one 12 years ago.  Best investment I ever made.  I didn't even own a second guitar or amp until 18 months ago and I still mainly play the el-cheap-o because I love the way it plays (and haven't found another guitar that I like as much).

I'd say the first thing is the kind of music you intend to play. That will help you figure out the style of guitar, nylons are basically classical and flamenco primarily but Willie Nelson plays one, also.
Very important.  Everyone has their favorite guitar styles.  Where I grew up, Garth Brooks and country music was huge, so that was the guitar everyone said to get (one those bigger acoustic styles, whatever he was playing), "a Gibson" at $2500, or some other guitar they liked and you weren't cool or a real musician unless you had the good stuff.  I knew what music I wanted to play, so I saw what the artists I liked were playing (most list in the album info) or what the local live musicians I liked were doing and took notes.

Secondly, it would really help if you had a guitar-playing friend to help you shop. You definitely need to hit guitar shops, but as a novice, you won't know what to look for and haven't developed a feel for what kind of neck you like.
Also very important.  Nothing can drive a beginner further away than a "comic book guy" music shop (what I had to work with).  A guy who talks down to you and refuses to sell you things or let you try out various guitars?  Keep walking.  Not to mention when you see 30 guitars hanging on the rack and have no idea what to look for besides price, it can be daunting (especially with guys who have been doing this for 35-40 years and seem intimidating).

Thirdly, don't spend a lot of money until you know if you'll stick with it. A few years learning the basics on a cheapo and you will be ready to move up to a mid-range instrument and know what to look for in one.
I quoted this one just because it is so true it bears repeating.  Don't invest any serious money until you know you are going to stick with it or just have tons of cash to blow on a setup that will collect dust.  Like I said earlier, my $65 guitar was all I had for 10 years since I didn't have the money or time to get serious about playing that would require taking it to the next level.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2008, 05:55:49 AM
Since I was playing bass with my band in the last several years, I had sold off my guitars and the last one was stolen. So when I started getting back into it, all I had was my girlfriend's El Cheapo Cort that was all kinds of jacked up. When we split, she let me keep it. When I got serious about playing again, that was what I worked my chops on, I ended up playing it for about six years. I told myself that if I got my chops back to a decent level, I'd buy myself the best guitar in the local shop. It was nice, because by the time I had the nice guitar, I could do justice to owning it and actually appreciate the quality of the instrument. It's still and utter joy to play, I've had it a couple years and it makes me smile every time I pick it up.

A few years on a starter guitar and you can do like I did, just go to the shop, tell them you are going to buy a guitar that day if you find one you like. Then play every single guitar in the shop. I've told the story earlier in this thread, but I went in thinking I was going to buy a Fender Strat, most of my idols play them. I walked out with the Gibson SG 61 reissue because it's the perfect guitar for me.

I'm still kicking myself in the ass for not buying the limited edition they had out a year or two ago. Same exact guitar as mine, black with gold hardware (and made in USA, baby). Maybe I'll get this (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Gibson-Custom-Shop-SG-Custom-Reissue-VOS-Electric-Guitar?sku=517998) in white if I ever have money again (broke due to updating my new house).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on July 02, 2008, 06:44:44 AM
So I stumbled across this in one of my music folders today. It's a recording of me playing the Indiana Jones theme on a ukulele. The quality is shabby and it's only a few seconds long because it was recorded on a cell phone.

http://www.supload.com/sound_confirm.php?get=481332882.wav (http://www.supload.com/sound_confirm.php?get=481332882.wav)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2008, 07:25:41 AM
Heh, that's cool! I almost busted out the recorder last night, I got hooked on singing Big Bad Bill driving home last night. I have the Van Halen version burned into my psyche but the version I listed to these days is Leon Redbone's, he's so amazing. I can't quite go low enough to do his version justice, so I slipped into a Tom Waits style for it and had a lot of fun. But I was too lazy to boot up the pc and find the chords for it.

Ended up playing some Purple Haze instead, I don't get enough time with the SG these days. I'm mostly playing my Alvarez over at the new house. I'm working on three pieces from the book I linked earlier: a 16th century jig, an 18th century classical piece and a flamenco style piece that I can't play to speed on the alvarez because the strings are too close together - there's a single note triplet in the main melody. I can physically play it thanks to my bass experience, but need a nylon stringer to do it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on July 02, 2008, 11:36:06 AM
Thanks man, I wish I had a good way to record my stuff. What I'd really like is an acoustic electric tenor. I recently found an 8 string A/E tenor on musician's friend, but I've no experience with buying instruments online. I do want one though.

Here's (http://youtube.com/watch?v=7L-u4CrFiTM) a guy playing a crappy one, but he manages to get some good sound out of it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2008, 11:54:18 AM
Reminds me a little of a charango. My favorite non-famous musician is a charango player named Conrado Garcia, I can't quickly dig up any of his solo stuff, he's sorta-famous as a composer, plays in the renfaire band Cantiga. Mind blowing technique, effortless.

Here's an example of charango: http://youtube.com/watch?v=MMPZqXxYF0g


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2008, 12:49:04 PM
Got thinking about gear. Kinda want an o/d pedal to pair with my little fender cab, not metal distortion, just a little dirty tone to moisten things up a bit. Researching wah pedals, too. Found this guy: http://www.fulltone.com/stpframe.html who seems to have a decent offering of both. The  FullDrive-2 MOFSET and the Clyde Deluxe Wah. Yum.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on July 04, 2008, 02:36:34 PM
So here's the hollow-body Ibanez I just bought. It sounds amazing. Sorry for the poor quality image. It's a phone picture.

(http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll171/climbjtree/ibanez.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Engels on July 04, 2008, 02:38:38 PM
That looks awsome.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on July 04, 2008, 02:42:50 PM
The cool part is that it sounds better than it looks. I need a better amp; an old Marshall or something would be great.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 04, 2008, 03:42:17 PM
Grats! Good choice.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 04, 2008, 11:37:38 PM
Even though I always found hollow bodies a bit too bulky, that is a gorgeous guitar. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 05, 2008, 07:03:18 AM
Well, they're pretty light...so kind of offsets the bulkiness in some respect. Err..maybe.

My only problem with them is that they're seriously noisy and prone to feedback. Used to have a pretty nice one, but I couldn't take it anymore (it's tolerable though if the environment's right).

[edit] No marshall! Go for a Fender Twin (or a deluxe reverb)...get a tubescreamer...then sound like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBm79O-IwXg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBm79O-IwXg)

Take off tubescreamer, sound like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGg3_T_FcOQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGg3_T_FcOQ)  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 07, 2008, 06:26:24 AM
More like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA3lTf-lh6E  :grin:

But I am very tempted to get the overdrive pedal I linked earlier to get some drive into things without blowing my amp up. At least now I don't have to worry about getting evicted, just blowing out my eardrums.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 08, 2008, 06:38:27 PM
Dude, young Brian Setzer pwns Old Brian Setzer, I'm sorry.  :-P


Yes, he's an even better musician now -- but the young version, well...that's possibly one of the only guys I'd have sex with (ahem...True Romance reference).

The dude is just the embodiment of cool though, either way.

Black Rebel M C is a cool band though... A little one tricked, but don't even deny that guitar sound. It's killer.

[edit] Hilarious comment on youtube:

"coreect me if im wrong, but is he playing a Gretsch White Falcon?

such a good guitar to have while your drummer uses garbage cans :D?"


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on July 09, 2008, 09:53:19 PM
Bah, I've been off and on trying to learn guitar from a book. This is not working out for me. I'm more of a visual learner and this book is atrocious for teaching considering the guy tends to drift off in the middle of important stuff. Suggestions for maybe videos or some other method of learning?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 09, 2008, 10:39:20 PM
I learned by getting the sheet music for one of my favorite albums, and some more that was of songs I knew well, and just pounding on it till I could play the chords.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 09, 2008, 11:18:40 PM
I never learned well from books (at first) either, Nix. Don't feel bad.

Best way to go about it (imo) is to talk to people who play themselves, and trade some licks (or rather, steal some). A little here and there.

Or start out simple. Screw 6 string chords for now. Screw blues riffs. Screw single note walks. Seriously, fuck that shit. It's lame and self indulgent on the teacher/book's part. Fuck it up it's pretentious ass.  :x

Ahem. Anyways... That stuff will happen in time. Just learn how to form a power chord for now. Then play the most boneheaded punk songs -- they're the easiest, and melodic enough where you can feel cool that you're making music. This is what matters.

Don't go through what I did -- the guy who taught me was some sadistic hippy who 1) made me learn to tune my own guitar by ear (a shitty $10 non-tunable hand-me-down at that) and 2) made me learn Pipeline (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aqKsvSVkr0&feature=related) and 3) made me learn righthanded when I was left!

On the flipside, I taught a friend who was a late bloomer how to play Die Die My Darling (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQlF-JVKRK4), and he became very fun and competent enough to play with in 6 months time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2008, 06:13:04 AM
Grow a bunch of pot plants with a couple friends. Make your friends buy instruments. Form a band. Try to learn how to play in between getting laid and high.

Well, that worked for me.

If you're visual, try looking on amazon for DVDs from an artist you like and would like to sound like. Shoot for someone simple at first, don't go straight for a virtuoso or you'll just get frustrated. Also hit up youtube, there's lots of cool instructional stuff there.

I disagree with Stray on 6-string chords, blues, and single note lines. Remember, this is a guy who likes young Brian Setzer better than old Brian Setzer because he's gay for him. Learning your open position chords and the basic barre chords is TOUGH, but essential to becoming a good guitarist. Learning to play guitar is TOUGH. There are years of work before you'll be any good. If you stick with it, you'll eventually regret any shortcuts you take. The 5 major open chords CAGED set up everything else you'll ever learn on guitar.

What's the important stuff you're wanting to work on right now? That could help us guide you.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on July 10, 2008, 06:44:41 AM
Right now I'm just trying to get simple stuff down. Power chords and basic transitioning between notes. My goal for the next month or so is to be able to play simple shit like some of those Green Day songs with all them fancy power chords :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2008, 06:52:21 AM
Get a Green Day songbook :) Can you read tab? It's easy and will help out alot.

http://www.amazon.com/Green-Day-Dookie-Authentic-Guitar-Tab/dp/0897244826

Play along versions are cool. They include two tracks for each song, one with guitar and one without, so you can play along with the bass and drums. Not original recording, it's done over guitar hero-style, but they're usually pretty good.

http://www.amazon.com/Green-Along-Guitar-Ultimate-Play-Along/dp/0739044273


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on July 10, 2008, 07:02:00 AM
I'll have to go stop in to a Chapter or something and see if I can find a copy of that. Or some other band who has a fascination with power chords.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 10, 2008, 07:48:32 AM
Sky! Of course, all of the main chords are important -- I just think it's something that should come later. Gotta walk, don't run (another great early song I learned btw  :-P).

Both of us have been playing for almost 20 years or more, and sometimes it's hard to forget how easy those things come to us now. Learning a G or a C or a barre (not to mention transitioning between them) is just a fat old bitch when you start out --- and it makes the student emphasize finger/physical dexterity more than, well.... Music. They get frustrated. I'd rather help people get to the roots of it.

I disagree about learning the guitar being tough. Playing is easy -- so many dickwads can do it, as we all know. Mastering is the hard part.

As for young Brian Setzer --- Stray Cat Strut is basically the direction he's gone to ever since, even if simplified. Not an easy song to play either (besides the base line). His solos are already in the jazzy spot at that stage. I wouldn't use that as an example for my liking for visceral songs...


Anyways.. Sorry, that was a mouthful. I just love the subject, of course.  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2008, 07:55:33 AM
Learning guitar is tough. You can have fun and learn power chord songs, but you should also learn to play properly. I did both, I took some classical guitar classes and learned fingerpicking and proper chords and all these years later I am so glad I got that early foundation, because it makes a lot of things easier now. Of course, I blew off a lot of the lessons on fingerpicking and though I'm very good at playing without a pick, I totally suck at learning structured fingerpicking because I took so many shortcuts over the years.

If you just want to be a hack and do power chords, don't ask me for advice.  :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 10, 2008, 08:36:54 AM
Heh, well I'm not exactly in the same school, but as I said, I learned through surf songs. Not classical, but hard enough.

I don't think it means you're a hack though if you start out powerchording. Look at the Clash -- started out as a straight up punk band, and then became one of the most creative bands of their time on all sonic fronts (not just guitars). And there are many others like that...

Not to mention that being able to just concentrate on a simple chord emphasize the by far most important thing -- rhythm. I know people who can do some complicated fingerings, but still have sketchiness on rhythm -- and they simply can't just "rock out".

And look at Malcolm Young, for example. We all know Angus is the shit and all that -- but it was Malcolm that wrote most of the riffs and was the core of that band. And the dude barely knows anything except like 2 chords (I'm kidding, of course...but y'know what I'm saying...the guy is basic). I'd rather listen to him than the billion wankers out there running complicated scales, but simply can't make anyone dance.

[edit] This is an age old argument, I guess. In "classical" music terms, it was the war between the virtuosic and the romantic take on music. Big derail though, blah blah blah.

You and I probably shouldn't be in much disagreement though. There's a middle ground, and we're probably both there. We like a lot of the same shit at least.  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on July 10, 2008, 10:15:23 AM
You two are like guitar lovers.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2008, 10:39:35 AM
What we both agree on is the only wrong way to play guitar is to not play guitar. Git practicin', Nixel!  :geezer:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on July 10, 2008, 10:42:33 AM
I have a small collection of really, really shitty guitars.  With 2 exceptions.  A nice wood bodied resonator and a brand new Ibanez ART100 i just got for father's day.  I'm glad to say i've been playing every single day since i got the new guitar (even if only for like 30min while i play a couple songs and screw around with scales).  I just have to make sure i pick it up every day...otherwise next thing i know its been a month or two and i havn't done shit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2008, 12:37:17 PM
I like having a few different guitars, it changes up the way I play and each style bolsters the others. Lately I've been playing the cheap Alvarez acoustic at the new house, so when I get a chance to plug in the SG, I can bend the shit out of stuff, with my fingerpicking maybe being a little too aggressive. But my leads end up better because I've been playing so much old delta-style blues and classical that I'm thinking more about chord shapes than linear lines. Then I go back to the acoustic and start all over again, trying to incorporate linear lines into chord movements.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on July 10, 2008, 01:15:00 PM
i agree with having lots of guitars (tried unsuccessfully to explain why to my wife and mother recently).
So far i've got

Hohner Acoustic (shitty)
Epi SG (super shitty, keep it in drop D b/c the G tuner is blown)
squire bass (just got for $20...shitty)

Rogue biscuit cone resonator (beautiful, awesome in open G for playing a little Son House, hurts my ears if i use a pick so i stick to fingers/slide)
Ibanez ART100 (nice little LP knockoff)

I'd love a semi-hollow body to round out my collection (maybe a gretsh)  but that will have to wait till i can stock up on gift certificates from Bday/xmas/etc.  This was my first father's day this year and it was kinda cool.  Like a bonus Bday etc.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on July 10, 2008, 01:37:57 PM
I say that all of you need to add ukuleles to your collections.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 10, 2008, 04:25:23 PM
I've probably had about 30-40 guitars. A few basses, and some other shit. I just never seem to hold on to anything. I have some weird "world" instruments that I have no clue how to play. I've had my Jazzmaster for awhile now too, I guess. It's my own custom wired frankenstein Jap/US model (soon to be even more gutted). No one else is gonna have it.

(http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/2443/jazzmasterandvibroking1dp0.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 10, 2008, 07:00:32 PM
I guess I am the odd one out who doesn't see a need for many guitars.  I've survived on one and only recently acquired another.  But then I am cheap cheap cheap when it comes to my instruments ($60 for the win!).

But yes, the only true wrong way to practice is not practice at all.  My guitar instructor said that the fundamentals are very important, but unless you plan on taking it to that high level or playing certain types of music professionally, it probably won't hurt to be sloppy if you can tolerate having to unlearn bad habits later on.  He had been playing for 8 years when his instructor in college told him his technique was poor and he had to essentially re-learn how to play if he wanted to get better, but he said the changes in his style and how much better of an artist on the guitar he was because of it was almost unreal and made the pain worth it.  Honestly, I think I learned more about how technique and fundamentals of music work from an artist point of view than I ever learned how to actually play songs when I took lessons from him, which now I appreciate even more than I did then.

My hardest part originally learning was finding songs I wanted to play.  They were either extremely difficult (which is frustrating) or extremely simple (which is boring).  It was hard to find a good balance.  Now I am almost on a song-a-day regimen where I figure I'll pick up a song and learn to play it for an hour or so and usually find myself not sucking too bad.  When I don't feel like learning a new one, I run through all of the old ones I've recently picked up.  Most of the stuff isn't that hard, the most difficult recently has been Zoot Alures or Fear Of The Dark, but last night was Don't Fear The Reaper and it was actually loads of fun.  It's nice to not suck too badly anymore.  Once I got over that hump, guitar life has been good.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 10, 2008, 08:08:51 PM
I'm lazy... Don't have the fire of my youth anymore.  :oh_i_see: I remember the old days, rewinding and playing and rewinding tapes, trying to learn shit. It rarely happens now. When I do learn songs, I can always get the basic structure, but when it comes to the more wankier parts, I just approximate and improvise. And if I can't do that, then fuck it. I have my own [lame] songs to play.  :awesome_for_real:

Just being realistic, I guess! Besides my laziness in replicating wanky solos, there are also those simple riffs that the great guitar gods have done, but I can't seem to make come out right --- For example: Over the Mountain (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8rPky04fbs). I mean, I know the notes. Easy song. But that sound Randy makes after "Take me across the sky!!!"

That shit ain't gonna come out of my fingers, sorry.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2008, 05:50:25 AM
 :heart: RR, one of the first guys I remember as a kid going "Holy shit that's a guitarist!" I used to wail that song on the tennis racket in front of the mirror :) My Moby Dick is SRV's version of Little Wing. I've been chasing that for a few years on and off (so maybe not totally monomaniacal). Lately I've just taken the chord structure and jammed over it. My fiancee thinks it's great but I want to play the full SRV version before I move onto playing my own. Same with my favorite song to play, the one I knew I was finally over the hump and getting better: Since I've Been Loving You (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89yw7wqoaio) by Zep. I learned it note for note before I started jamming it. The linked version is from the DVD and I actually play it closer to that version because it shows how loose Pagey actually played it live. I fuckin' love that song.

Now I'm working on singing it while playing, as part of my whole learning to sing while playing thing. It's almost like starting over again, at first it just seems like it will never happen. But it gets a bit easier as long as the guitar parts aren't too complex. And once you get started, it kinda changes the way you approach a song, because I'm more likely to be singing along as I learn the chord changes and filling in the fiddly bits after.

Looking at some different versions, this one (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_wMslbxwOA&NR=1) shows the importance of the rhythm section. Bonham made that song every bit as much as Page and Plant, and the bass and keyboard on that version can't touch Jonesy alone on keyboards. Also stumbled across this great vocal (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQK5iupEp6I) by Corrine Bailey Rae


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on July 11, 2008, 06:24:38 AM
Quote
I say that all of you need to add ukuleles to your collections.

Actually i was just listing my guitars.

I also have 1 ukulele (from Hawaii, gift from a friend)
1 Banjo (gift for wife, she never plays it so i started trying to learn it)
and 20+ harmonicas...

I guess i'm an instrument junkie (that's not even counting my wife's amazingly nice viola).
Maybe i'm making up for being a late starter.  Never had lessons.  my parents asked me if i wanted to learn something as a kid, so being the little shit i was i said "hell no."  I've regretted that for a long time now.  But its ok, Once my daughter gets older the question will not be IF she wants to learn but rather "What instrument do you want to learn."
For being 11.9 months (her birthday is next weekend) old she's got decent rhythm and a good love of music.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 11, 2008, 07:07:36 AM
SRV's Little Wing. Definitely another one, Sky.

I hate to admit it, I had a "SRV" hate phase, maybe just because his name is dropped so, so much, but Little Wing seriously outfuckingdoes Hendrix. That's all there is to it.

Nowadays, I think that Stevie Ray is a god. I listen to that live version of "Texas Flood (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWLw7nozO_U) and just go "Whoa! There's a dude that accomplished something on earth. Fuck."


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2008, 08:35:49 AM
It's hard to put aside the ignorance SRV has caused among younger blues fans. You go see a guy like BB or Buddy Guy and they start telling stories about the old blues guys, and everyone starts yelling "STEVIE!". Buddy Guy got wicked pissed at one show, saying SRV was great, but you gotta learn about what went before, same as SRV. Most of SRV's great stuff is built on what came before. I got into blues hardcore mostly listening to SRV one summer, but I had been listening to Muddy for years before that, so I kinda got into the SRV hate phase for a long time. Now I can enjoy it all. I just try to turn the kids onto Albert (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5dpp2iCRwM), Buddy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rd8y8A2oE), Otis (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy2tEP3I3DM), T-Bone (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1xvx0UHa0A), Freddie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aimj-mTeFKA), Sam (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoXI1zZbGIc), Matt (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxmyFGrR9V4[/url) (with Memphis Slim and Willie Dixon), Hound Dog (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8atogELhv_Q), Earl (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RBcCIMvg8U), Johnny (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9aFHQG7w5E), Rory (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33Jaodra7AY), Peter (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zukpuHTL6vA) (and Danny, I'm on a huge Mac bender lately, love their live stuff), Lightnin' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQQ4YTL1P1A), Luther (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=disChgvT5tg), Son (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN0RNZE2q68), uhh etc :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on July 11, 2008, 08:44:09 AM
I'd say SRV's Little Wing is amazing, but half of what makes Hendrix's so good is his vocals, in my opinion.

Also, are y'all familiar with the hang drum? I am completely hooked on this thing. Looks like I'll be taking a trip to Switzerland, I guess. Super hard to get one of these things.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on July 11, 2008, 09:36:38 AM
favorite blues vocalist:  Robert Johnson
favorite slide: Son House
Favorite harp: Big Walter "Shakey" Horton (not to be confused with that Little Walter hack...imho)

as you can see i dig the rural blues more than the city incarnation (i like the stuff after too, but the old shit just feels...i dunno...right)

edit: on a sad note i was totally stoked about moving to Memphis "Home of the Blues" but i'm finding very little blues here.  Its almost all rap that is shitty and tourist blues on beale.

edit2: some spelling.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2008, 10:15:13 AM
I love the older stuff, too. Though my favorite vocalist is hard to pin down, I love Muddy but Howlin' Wolf is more like what I wish I sounded like. Blind Willie Johnson is great for vocals and slide. And of course Elmore is amazing on slide. Big Bill is maybe my overall favorite from the acoustic-only set.

I certainly wouldn't call Little Walter a hack. I like him, but I probably prefer Junior Wells, but Jr's vocals and Buddy Guy help with that one.

I don't really have favorites anymore.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 11, 2008, 12:36:45 PM
It's hard to put aside the ignorance SRV has caused among younger blues fans. You go see a guy like BB or Buddy Guy and they start telling stories about the old blues guys, and everyone starts yelling "STEVIE!". Buddy Guy got wicked pissed at one show, saying SRV was great, but you gotta learn about what went before, same as SRV. Most of SRV's great stuff is built on what came before. I got into blues hardcore mostly listening to SRV one summer, but I had been listening to Muddy for years before that, so I kinda got into the SRV hate phase for a long time. Now I can enjoy it all. I just try to turn the kids onto Albert (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5dpp2iCRwM), Buddy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rd8y8A2oE), Otis (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy2tEP3I3DM), T-Bone (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1xvx0UHa0A), Freddie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aimj-mTeFKA), Sam (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoXI1zZbGIc), Matt (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxmyFGrR9V4[/url) (with Memphis Slim and Willie Dixon), Hound Dog (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8atogELhv_Q), Earl (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RBcCIMvg8U), Johnny (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9aFHQG7w5E), Rory (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33Jaodra7AY), Peter (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zukpuHTL6vA) (and Danny, I'm on a huge Mac bender lately, love their live stuff), Lightnin' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQQ4YTL1P1A), Luther (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=disChgvT5tg), Son (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN0RNZE2q68), uhh etc :)


Gotcha! But dude, I'm not that young! Probably only a few years younger than you (31). I got respect my brutha!

Otis is the best fucking guitar player/singer combo ever. That man is in my top 5, and my top 1 blues player.

Albert IS Stevie without the manic-ness. And I'm from Texas, so I dig the Texas blues shit, it's all over here man. Favorite current Texas dude is Doyle Bramhall II (well, he's not current...been around since Stevie, and made that excellent Arc Angels album about/after Stevie passed away). What I meant though is, I loved Stevie, and then just kind of wanted to stop hearing about him...He's just talked about all the time. Then I came back around again. He deserves to be talked about. The guy was so passionate, playing wise, singing wise. Amazing through and through.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2008, 12:54:07 PM
I just agreed with you, dipshit  :grin:

Doyle's fucking awesome, I got turned onto his stuff by a coworker but the first thing I have with him on it is the CD/DVD set of Clapton's Sessions for Robert J, which is a cool set (and the Robert Johnson tribute album is pretty good, too, for a bunch of white dudes). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADfRtUJ01oI

And then there was the last Clapton tour I REALLY wanted to see, with Clapton, Bramhall and Trucks. Holy shnikes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yaJVT1yV9s


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 11, 2008, 06:55:06 PM
Haven't seen any of that (I think?). Will try to check it out, thanks.

Yeah, Doyle's great. Moving away from Blues and a little into the Soul/R&B kind of thing lately, but it's still groovy, positive stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on July 14, 2008, 05:18:14 AM
Quote
Howlin' Wolf is more like what I wish I sounded like.

I think every male wishes they had that deep, gravely voice.  Its genetics or some shit.

Quote
I certainly wouldn't call Little Walter a hack


I know, i'm just a little bitter about him because everytime i bring up Big Walter people think i'm talking about Little Walter.  The difference is astronomical.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 14, 2008, 07:50:44 AM
I wish I had a gravely voice, but more in the Jeff Tweedy sense. Any Wilco fans here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGlsfM3Tf70 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGlsfM3Tf70)


Not their most rockin' song (but they do have a MONSTROUS guitar player in Nels Cline (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmddP2cJkJ8&feature=related)), but that song is great stuff imo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 18, 2008, 04:17:19 AM
Revisting Little Wing...

While I admire if you try to learn a Jimi or SRV version, don't you think it's just a damn fun song to run with on your own? Y'know getting the basic Jimi hammer-ons and shit, knowing the chords, and just doing your own version? Just curious...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 18, 2008, 04:29:48 AM
...don't you think it's just a damn fun song to run with on your own?
I used to do this for hours in my room in high school.  Figure out a song's basic structure and just run with it for 15-20m.  None of my friends ever understood why you wouldn't want to make it sound just like the record.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 18, 2008, 04:42:49 AM
Fuck em!  :awesome_for_real: I think if Jimi himself played Little Wing in front of people, it would definitely not sound like the album version either.

Seriously though, I had the same problem back in highschool days. This is even when I WOULD play a song perfectly, but say, did it on an acoustic or used a different tone than the original. People come around as you get older though. The only ones who I'd say are completely forgiving are the girls. As long as you can strike a note, you're probably OK!

This goes without saying that this is exactly what SRV did with the song anyways.  :-)

[edit] See, I'm just mentioning this because I'm trying to get a decent sounding version on acoustic. I can't really hit that nice lead bend at the end on this guitar, so I'm trying to substitute the lead with a kind of bass-y, jazzy thing.

[edit] Ah, so here's a guy doing it the way I'm shooting for. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9KIHzvMCE8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9KIHzvMCE8)

I was checkin' other versions, and while good, they blow off into shredder wankery. The guy above is keeping it tasteful and simple (I'm trying to sing my version too, Eb much easier to do it with).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 18, 2008, 05:43:51 AM
I am incapable of playing a song straight. Just can't do it. Was playing through some stuff from the Guitar Hero songbook I linked in the GH3 thread, and I was laughing at myself how much I meandered through songs. The reason I want to learn the Hendrix version as recorded is part tribute, part base. I listened to a LOT of Hendrix as a kid, even when I was full-on metal, and it's my fiancee's favorite song, so that's the tribute. Then I take the original as a base, so I can work off that and just put in the touchstone phrases that everyone wants to hear and that identify the song.

The SRV version is simply the best song ever recorded on guitar, so same kinda deal. I want to learn it to play straight for myself and also to have the phrase bag for when I'm jamming it.

Basically, what I said about Since I've Been Loving You. It was a bit easier with that because there are a few live versions of Jimmy playing it. I'm all over on that song, it's my favorite pattern (12/8) and my favorite style (minor blues), so I can really explore different ways of playing it. But you need the touchstone phrases to bring it back to the recognizable, and also as lead-ins if you're playing with a band, so they know you're moving into another part of the song.

The worst version I've heard to date is the G3 version from Vai, Satriani and Malmsteen. Vai's cheesy lounge vocals and the inappropriate soloing. Satch did a decent solo in the song, but did join the wankfest at the end. I fucking hate wankers and struggle to not do that when I play, since I was birthed (musically speaking) in the age of the shred.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 18, 2008, 06:01:41 AM
Right on. Everything you said I agree with. Get the key phrases and just explore a little.

I couldn't really wank even if I wanted to though. Although I find myself *able* to wank sometimes, depending on the guitar. I have this Ibanez sitting around right now that I can shred on much easier than I can on a Strat or my JM. The fretboard is so damn flat, and the strings feel like air (as opposed to the cables on my Fender). I digress though.

I'm sure that SRV can wank with the best of them (and Jimi, of course), but he just had that instinct to not go over the top, and injected everything with soul (if that makes sense). OR more importantly, he kept it what it was -- essentially a blues-y song. I am impressed on a technical level by wankers, but they never give me goosepumps. It's no better than elevator music to me. That kid above does a better acoustic version than this guy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31QQ1gNpAaY) in my opinion (i.e. the Welcome to Squareville version).

[edit] OK, I just watched that G3 version. Still not as bad as that Monte Montgomery version above (seriously, that shit would be the version of Little Wing I'd hear in Hell).

At least the G3 version started out OK. Even Steve's vocals were cool...BUT then, yeah, he started getting all Perry Como and shit. Malmsteen fucked it all up. Malmsteen fucks everything up, for that matter. Steve did a cool solo, even if it was wankery. Joe did the right thing though and brought it down to earth. All in all though, it still lacked balls.

There's only two shredders that I really like, I think. That's Randy and EVH (well Zakk, Dime, and that Billy Idol dude too). I don't know what it is about them, but they manage to wank and have soul at the same time (well EVH used to at least). There's still a tinge of blues to what they do.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 18, 2008, 08:25:30 AM
I fucking hate wankers and struggle to not do that when I play, since I was birthed (musically speaking) in the age of the shred.

I appreciate the technical mastery of wankers, but they are unlistenable to me.  Gilmour in Comfortably Numb or most any Clapton solo evokes far more raw emotion while drawing the listener in.  I always brought this to my professional playing.  When I practice, I'll play crazy Chris Squire of Geddy Lee bass lines, but in front of people I prefer to sit in back and support a solid groove.  I think it's all part of being secure enough to adopt a less-is-more philosophy with music. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 18, 2008, 08:33:49 AM
Eh, I was all over as a bass player. Whatever worked with the song. I was watching a thing on MHD the other night about the Who, and it's funny how similar Entwistle is when it comes to bass lines, at least conceptually. We were also a four-piece, so it was just me and the guitar, and that's a LOT of space to fill, especially during solo time. I rarely saw the bass as a bass, more as just another instrument. People say I play bass like guitar and guitar like bass, but whatever. I don't bother with those kind of preconceived notions of what's proper, as long as it works in the context of whatever you're playing.

And we saw the Colbert Report with Rush and I was reminded of my bass tone, before I took over bass duties our old bass player was a huge Rush fan and had that tone totally dialed in. So when I started playing bass, I just stole his tone :) I love playing guitar, but there's just something you can't replace about a good, LOUD, thunderous tone coming out of your fingers.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 18, 2008, 08:47:15 AM
Btw, new Buddy Guy album out soon: http://www.buddyguy.net/site.html for some tracks. If he is in your area, I /highly/ recommend getting out to see him. He's in his 70s and still puts on a damned good show.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 18, 2008, 10:31:12 AM
Heh yeah, I get the same comment Sky. Almost had to kick my friend's ass once, when he told me  "Dude, you need to quit guitar. You're so much better on bass." Haha.

But it's all purposeful, y'see (yeah, so I say  :awesome_for_real:).

Really though, I don't necessarily get crazy on bass -- I couldn't anyways. I both hold Nebu's philosophy about the groove, but sometimes go out of my way to not keep it completely straight. I still do fill-ins and jump to seemingly odd areas. A melodic bass player.. or whatever you want to call it.

I like to play rhythm guitar though, and flourish someone else's rhythm with a seemingly different riff that makes it all sound bigger. That's what's fun to me. Not bass playing. It could be the simplest shit that turns a basic rock song into something better. This is why I harp on about Television so much. If you take the time to learn the second guitar in See No Evil (below), you see how brilliant it is... It could have been just another punk song, but it isn't.

Example: Television - See No Evil (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/seenoevil.mp3)

Anyhow, not enough people explore the secondary/possible rhythms in a song, so when I jam, I aspire to that. I don't give a shit if it's technically impressive or not. I just want a song to sound better.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 18, 2008, 10:50:08 AM
We were also a four-piece, so it was just me and the guitar, and that's a LOT of space to fill, especially during solo time.

I played in a 3 piece, so I understand.  You also make a great point about Entwistle.  What I loved about Entwistle was that he recognized that the sound of the bass was every bit as important as the notes.  Don't get fooled again is a great example.  After years playing bass, taurus pedals, and singing, I always felt that playing in a 4 or 5 piece allowed a lot more creativity.  This may be why I was such a huge Nirvana fan.  They did a lot with the 3 piece especially considering how hamstrumg they were at bass.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 18, 2008, 11:29:09 AM
Don't forget the Police!  :awesome_for_real: At least on the earlier albums.

Speaking of Nirvana, sometimes I think the young Sting was even more depressed and dark than Cobain was (especially in this song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bXMi3PSyW8)). All while doing reggae. Hah!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 18, 2008, 12:08:58 PM
NSFW - http://kingdomofstyle.typepad.co.uk/photos/uncategorized/mond1.jpg I want that as an inspirational poster :P

I always wanted some of those pedals, a friend had some and they seemed cool as hell.

Rhythm, lead whatever. Too categorical imo. It's one reason I love the old-time blues guys. I was reading a blues history book a few years ago and one of the 'young guys' (first gen electric players) was complaining about the old guys sitting in with them. "Them old guys, can't sit in with you. They play the bottom, the top, the middle, they don't leave no room for nobody else!"

I can't wait for this moving stuff to settle down, finish the last few major construction projects and get back to jamming. I was actually about to start playing out at the open mic nights when the whole house thing gelled, so it was bad timing as far as playing goes! Here's the two songs I have ready to go (that I can also sing with):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Humlh4YeEw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odhl-UqBymw
(heh - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VlRUIHwygc )

While I'm making friday afternoon links, I got a coupon for amazon as a credit card bonus reward thingy, which is nirvana for a broke guy. Here's the loot drops:

http://www.amazon.com/Live-Boston-Dig-Fleetwood-Mac/dp/B000086EOF - second part of the live show I've been listening to alot lately  :heart: Green + Kirwin
http://www.amazon.com/Acoustic-Masters-Brozmans-Bottleneck-Guitar/dp/1576237273 - been on my wishlist for years
http://www.amazon.com/Birth-Groove-Guitar-1945-1965-Inside/dp/0793551668 - I've got another book in the series that's about the blues, good reading and style summation
http://www.amazon.com/Play-Solo-Flamenco-Guitar-Martin/dp/0786664584 - another style I like to dabble in, so I want to start getting better...now I need a nylon string :)
http://www.amazon.com/Country-Guitar-Grossmanæs-Masters-American/dp/0739042815 - Checking out this series, looks pretty decent. Mishmash of prose, fake sheets and tab/notation.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 18, 2008, 12:26:00 PM
Kind of my point! I like different types of parts to be layered on to each other. If you're crunching chords, it's kind of pointless for the other guy to be crunching the same chords as you. Or vice versa. Throw some part of a lead in there, something that his fingers can't get to physically, and run around the rhythm. Then switch roles accordingly. I don't like the "system" of a strictly rhythm guitar player, with the lead guitarist following the chords until he breaks into a solo. There are more possibilities.

Supposedly, one of the first examples of this type interchanging of riffs was the Stones, when Brian was alive (in 19th Nervous Breakdown (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgpXwDduyhs)).

My other point is that I could be doing a very minor thing (cuz that's all it takes sometimes), but a dipshit audience/friend of mine thinks the playing is not impressive. It doesn't have to be. Only the song needs to be.

I'd take that poster. Only rock poster I have is of Elvis. I'm a fag.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 18, 2008, 07:00:42 PM
Right on. Everything you said I agree with. Get the key phrases and just explore a little.
I remember learning Black Dog from Led Zeppelin at 16 and playing the shit out of it for 10-15 minutes at a time.  Extra chorus, extra verse, nifty things tossed in at the end to extend it considerably.  I wanked and sucked at it, but I had a good time figuring out what sounded good and what sounded lame (no matter how much you read or theorize, it doesn't mean anything unless you try it and verify).  I had an interesting version of War Pigs into Behind The Wall Of Sleep and NIB then back to War Pigs with an extended outro that was fun and went on for almost half an hour with various parts tossed in to make it interesting (too bad the shitty cassette recording was lost years ago - technology was JUST there on computer recording but I didn't have the machine to do it).

I don't like the "system" of a strictly rhythm guitar player, with the lead guitarist following the chords until he breaks into a solo. There are more possibilities.
Agreed wholeheartedly here.  Listen to Iron Maiden and Judas Priest, all the guitarists are playing different parts of the song at the same time.  Sometimes one guy does lead, sometimes another just jams on the chords, every now and again some nifty harmonies show up.  Then there are guitar solos that switch back and forth 3-4 times and all complement each other.  Beats 2 guitarists mashing the same power chords the whole time.  I can't remember specifically which artist I listened to where I came to the realization that "lead" and "rhythm" were just terms that didn't mean anything without some soul behind the song.  And that I didn't have to stick to one or the other.

One thing I am not much of a fan of is 5-6 layered guitar tracks on a song in a 3 or 4 piece band.  Either they end up faded so poorly into the mix you can't hear them or they jumble around and don't contribute much to the song besides a mess and expense.  Then there is the complication of actually trying to make the song sound something similar live.

Regarding tone, it is interesting to toy around with it.  I used to ignore it, then I got an amp that actually worked and could make changes.  Certain artists I can absolutely nail the guitar sound (Judas Priest, Jeff Hanneman of Slayer, certain Bad Religion songs) others I just can't make it sound remotely close (Alex Lifeson: looking at YOU, especially on The Pass).  It is interesting to hear the studio trickery in the guitar work on certain artists and then see how they play it live, then realize that YES, there really is studio trickery going on to make the guitar sound the way it does.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 19, 2008, 09:44:28 AM
Heh, I guess I could say that I can be wanker when it comes to tone. Not always necessarily in replicating a song (as I said, I don't get too crazy about that), but I do stop midway through songs a lot when jamming other stuff. Just when everyone's in a groove, all of the sudden I'm tweaking all of my knobs or grabbing a different guitar and getting pissed lol. Sometimes though, it's understandable. I live in a town of hard rockers and metalheads -- and I'm the guy who plays fenders and blues amps (not to say my gear can't get "hard", but more in a overdrive, garage-y kind of way). I have a digital amp that can bring out harder tones, but I only recently got a guitar with hot pickups again. You can not play metal or anything even resembling metal on a jazzmaster.

In a way though, I would that that I'M the one who sounds harder than the metalheads. My gear is just beautifully ugly. I usually shoot for something Jack White-ish/JSBX/Sage/Verlaine-ish. A lot of metal is technically harder, but it sounds a lot more sanitized imo.

Never run into tone problems on bass. So much easier to get what I want there.

It's easier to approximate other artists conveniently through digital amps now, but not exactly ideal either. You'll find though that cab emulation is the bigger problem. These amps do a pretty good job of getting some nuances of a plexi's pre/power stage, or a twin, or whatever, but then, if you're amp only has one or two speakers, it's going to sound off in some songs. This goes without mentioning how the original track was mic'ed, or double tracked, and shit like that. Heh


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 19, 2008, 06:16:16 PM
I was just going through some old cd's and came across this song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x6uoNqH-_A).  If you forward to about 1:10 you'll see a great example of bass playing minimalizm that generates a tremendous groove.  God I love the bass line in this song. 

Never run into tone problems on bass. So much easier to get what I want there.

I wish I could say that.  I have a 70's era jazz that I play through an old ampeg and a 2x10 enclosure.  I love the crispness, but can't get the growl that I want without going back to a Rick bass.  The other thing that's killing me is this hollow body bass I have.  I used to play through a vox hollow and recently bought an ibanez bass that looks like a ES335.  It makes some interesting sounds, but I can't get a solid bottom end from it.  Maybe that's just the deal with the hollow body.  Maybe I need to use my 2x15 cab more... I need to replace the drivers in it. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 19, 2008, 09:25:31 PM
I bet that ampeg is the shit. The 10's are fine for that growling sound, though you might to add more 10's.  :awesome_for_real:

Besides that, just crank mids and bass, turn down treb. Not sure what the nature is of your jazz, maybe since it's vintage, the pickups have cooled down over time, but j's can definitely growl (not to say they can sound like a Ric though). Perhaps you're Ric just had hotter pickups at the time, and was more suitable to how that amp started breaking up. I'd suggest checking out a solid body with humbuckers, even a cheapo, and seeing how it sounds. You're hollow probably has hb's (as does everything Ibanez), but yeah, they're kind of thin otherwise.

[edit] My favorite bass groove.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPH3xNkHFhE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPH3xNkHFhE)

Obvious choice, I know. It's great stuff though. I go long periods without playing bass, and it's always the first thing I start playing when I pick one up.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 21, 2008, 07:33:09 AM
I'd really like to get an ampeg head to match my ampeg 8x10 cab (really 7x10 :| ). I've needed to upgrade my bass pickups for about ten years now. With my old gigging rig (which was stolen) of Kasino power amp into a peavey 2x15 loaded with 2 400W full range EV's, I played so loud that I got a pretty decent Geddy Lee thumping tone. A lot of it was in the fingers, though. Now with my shitty little Peavey Mk III and the whole not playing at extreme volume, the pickups are lame. Had a roommate for a while with an old Gibson grabber, the pickups on that thing fucking rocked. I tried to buy it from him since he didn't play bass, but he wouldn't sell (vintage early 60s, in case, mint condition with tags...he bought for $150). I kept pestering him, and one day he was all "Oh yeah, I sold that." Fucker. A rickey is definitely on the list to get some day.

Minimalism, eh. We had a few songs where I went for that, but I tend to have a hard time playing minimalist. My only problem with minimalism is when people criticize my non-minimalist playing (cough Nebu cough).  :awesome_for_real:

Check out something like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K91Qj870HHk The bass line is pretty simpy, but tight and active. And even with that in most modern blues setups, the bass and guitar would be covering piano parts, too. I tend toward the active bass players, just my own preference and natural style. When I picked up the bass the guys I learned from were Geez, Geddy, Harris, and Cliff. The first bass songs I learned were http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKQ5jhtFypg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjoxJsgbWbM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_ofFa50LzY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CplR6xl5-14


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 21, 2008, 08:39:51 AM
My speakers aren't working very well. Can't hear the bass in that Muddy song.  :|

I think I'm in agreement with both of ya though. I like minimalism, but yet, I like moving around in it a little, and not following root notes all the time. There's the minimalists, the badass maestros, and the melodic guys, I guess. I fall in the last category. Most of what I learned/admired about bass playing came from Paul McCartney actually.. He'd play some simple groove for the first few bars, and then start moving around, keeping the groove, but in completely different ways. Mike Watt (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjAAml_AtPM&feature=related) is another favorite. And of course, Flea. I mean, Flea can rip with the best of em, but he's mostly melodic when it comes to recorded songs.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 21, 2008, 09:09:03 AM
I've found that my movement in a piece depends on a couple of things:  How good the drummer is and how busy the guitar/keyboards are.  It's all about creating a cohesive piece of music.  I'm not a huge fan of Mozart and try to keep my meandering appropriate to the music.  John Paul Jones is a master at this which is why I think he's often very underrated as a bass player. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 21, 2008, 09:18:11 AM
You're right... It's all about the song in the end. Whatever works!  :-)

I'll admit, I'm probably guilty of "underrating" John Paul Jones. Hell, and Entwistle as well. Both of those guys had to keep their bands in check though. Who else was gonna do it? Bonham? Moon? Page? Townsend? Yeah, right.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 21, 2008, 09:49:12 AM
OK, on to a different subject (well, back to Jimi songs).

Don't know why I didn't notice this before, but is it kind of...well...impossible...to get Jimi right without playing with your thumb (that is, if you're really trying to get it right)?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 21, 2008, 10:02:41 AM
SRV is like that, too, for obvious reasons. Luckily, I was really into Hendrix when I was playing the tennis racket, so when I got a guitar, I learned a few of his tunes, though not the lead parts. So even though I have pretty small hands, playing stuff like Wind Cries Mary during that formative time paid off for the old thumb.

I like Andy Aledort's Hendrix instructional DVD. Andy rocks. He's on tour with Dickey Betts.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 21, 2008, 10:08:28 AM
I noticed that John Frusciante is the same way.

Oh well! I learned that fingerpicking technique from White Wedding. Using my thumb is long overdue. Time to learn something new.  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 21, 2008, 04:58:00 PM
Don't know why I didn't notice this before, but is it kind of...well...impossible...to get Jimi right without playing with your thumb (that is, if you're really trying to get it right)?
Yes.  Very amusing to see that pop up from time to time, and since I don't usually play with my thumb that way, it alway sounds like crap until I've practiced it a few times (well, less like crap than it normally sounds like).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 21, 2008, 06:18:51 PM
All of this time, I've just played some of his chords by barre-ing, and then used my pinky when he does those hammer-ons. I'm noticing though from Little Wing that it's really difficult doing it that way, when transitioning from some chords (like that sliding riff at the end of the intro run, right before he sings)....He's hitting bass notes at the oddest times. Figured it was the thumb.

It's not physically hard though. I have big hands. But it is a bigger pain in the ass on my acoustic (which is how I want to cover some Jimi songs).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 07, 2008, 09:16:50 AM
Recently tossed up on the blog:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/07/27/the-sunday-song-dadgaething/

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/07/06/the-sunday-song-midsummer/

Both mostly just messing around.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 19, 2008, 07:05:26 AM
Picks...

What do you prefer?


I'm finding my habits are changing in different ways (been kinda touching on that). Picks are another thing. Almost always used to use very thin picks (and just burned through a lot of them). Now I'm preferring super fucking hard ones. I'm not as fast and can't strum as easily, but the attack is so much more ballsy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 19, 2008, 07:56:44 AM
It's interesting that you mention this.  I found that the better the guitarist I played with was, the thicker the pick they used.  I've always loved the attack of a thick pick, but found I could control a thin pick better.  I guess this says a lot about my guitar skill. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 19, 2008, 08:23:41 AM
It's interesting that you mention this.  I found that the better the guitarist I played with was, the thicker the pick they used.  I've always loved the attack of a thick pick, but found I could control a thin pick better.  I guess this says a lot about my guitar skill. 

That is interesting. I feel like I'm finally getting decent at least.  :why_so_serious:


Actually, I don't think I'll ever be that great. I'm too lazy! Or maybe I should say complacent. Not really in learning so much - I like learning. But I'm lazy in implementation. Especially recording. I think I've always been pretty good at getting a good riff out... But I hate making up a bunch of parts and composing things to make it all sound truly great. I don't have the discipline or patience for that. I need someone else to kick my ass probably. It's either that, or I join jam bands. Not much of a middle ground between the two for me.

======

On another note.. I was just wondering... Does anyone here rip off Jimi a little? I ran into a little riff earlier, and it sounds really Jimi like (but not exactly something he's done himself). It's weird though... I've been spending time trying to learn Little Wing, but this sounds more like late period funk Jimi.


Jimi Ripoff (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/jimiripoff.mp3)

Bad quality, I know. It's just a garageband thing through my computer mic I did real quick. You get the idea though. And if anything, this PROVES that a Jazzmaster can sound like a Strat.  :wink:


[edit] On a sidenote, John Frusciante is the premier "funk period Jimi" knockoff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 19, 2008, 06:09:20 PM
Lenny Kravitz has his Jimi moments too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on August 19, 2008, 07:03:23 PM
I hate thin picks and always have, even back when I was a novice first learning.  I prefer a good thick pick.  A quarter or nickel works well too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 20, 2008, 09:08:07 AM
If I use a pick, I use mediums. Lately, I don't use a pick -- have actually gotten in the habit of keeping my right hand nails a little bit long. I tear them regularly, given that I mostly fingerpick on medium-gauge steel strings!

I only ever really used a thin pick for that particularly slappy-slappy strum sound, but when I do that I invariably break the tip off them, I guess because I hold them too tight.

Posted a video of myself playing that tune "November" which I posted here a while back.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/08/17/the-sunday-video-november/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 20, 2008, 09:10:55 AM
Really beautiful Raph.  :-)

Who would you say is your main influence anyways?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 20, 2008, 08:35:22 PM
For writing, it's Paul Simon and Billy Joel. I aim for that sort of melodic quality (I like stuff you can hum), and if it has lyrics, that literate quality when they are at their best. For playing... lots and lots of folk artists with alternate tunings and stuff, some obscure and some not. I don't actually listen to all THAT much instrumental acoustic guitar. So for me an instrumental piece is just a song that doesn't have lyrics.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 03:49:44 AM

One thing I am not much of a fan of is 5-6 layered guitar tracks on a song in a 3 or 4 piece band.  Either they end up faded so poorly into the mix you can't hear them or they jumble around and don't contribute much to the song besides a mess and expense.  Then there is the complication of actually trying to make the song sound something similar live.

I always thought that was cool about Dimebag on, what album was that? (I think it was first on Vulgar Display of Power).  They decided to just play what they could reproduce live and would drop the rhythm guitar tracks during the solo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 03:52:21 AM
I hate thin picks and always have, even back when I was a novice first learning.  I prefer a good thick pick.  A quarter or nickel works well too.
I prefer the green Dunlop Tortex picks.  I've used thicker ones before though.  The Dunlop Jazz IIIs are pretty cool.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 03:56:04 AM
It's interesting that you mention this.  I found that the better the guitarist I played with was, the thicker the pick they used.  I've always loved the attack of a thick pick, but found I could control a thin pick better.  I guess this says a lot about my guitar skill. 

I got ahead of myself with the last two posts because I am reading this backwards, but yeah, I agree.  Pick attack is a huge part of the guitar sound, and I don't understand why guys, like Eric Johnson, shy away from it. Zakk Wylde has kinda got out of control lately, and has not been in my taste with his "HARDCORE PENTATONIC!!!!!!!!!" style, but I always loved his pick attack and how much a part of his sound it was.  I just liked him when he was more melodic.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 03:58:40 AM
Favorite current Texas dude is Doyle Bramhall II (well, he's not current...been around since Stevie, and made that excellent Arc Angels album about/after Stevie passed away). What I meant though is, I loved Stevie, and then just kind of wanted to stop hearing about him...He's just talked about all the time. Then I came back around again. He deserves to be talked about. The guy was so passionate, playing wise, singing wise. Amazing through and through.

I have that Smokestack album and it kicks ass.  Plus, Doyle's dad helped Stevie write some of his best tunes on "In Step"!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 04:02:00 AM
I fucking hate wankers and struggle to not do that when I play, since I was birthed (musically speaking) in the age of the shred.

I appreciate the technical mastery of wankers, but they are unlistenable to me.  Gilmour in Comfortably Numb or most any Clapton solo evokes far more raw emotion while drawing the listener in.  I always brought this to my professional playing.  When I practice, I'll play crazy Chris Squire of Geddy Lee bass lines, but in front of people I prefer to sit in back and support a solid groove.  I think it's all part of being secure enough to adopt a less-is-more philosophy with music. 

OMG, the first solo for "Comfortably Numb", and especially the first bar of the solo, is one of the most incredibly constructed solos, ever.  It sends shivers down my spine every time I hear it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 04:16:33 AM
Learning guitar is tough. You can have fun and learn power chord songs, but you should also learn to play properly. I did both, I took some classical guitar classes and learned fingerpicking and proper chords and all these years later I am so glad I got that early foundation, because it makes a lot of things easier now. Of course, I blew off a lot of the lessons on fingerpicking and though I'm very good at playing without a pick, I totally suck at learning structured fingerpicking because I took so many shortcuts over the years.

If you just want to be a hack and do power chords, don't ask me for advice.  :drill:

I look back and think that all the tabs in the music mgazines and this idea that I had to learn shit note for note (which I was too lazy too do in reality) really hampered me.  It was discouraging to look at that stuff and try to get it down.  But at the same time, I looked down on the song books that just showed you the basic chords, with no riffs.

It wasn't until I was able to sing and play at the same time that things started to come together.  I'm super out of practice right now, but at least I know how to do it if I want to get it together.

Yeah, it's long and boring to learn all those scales, chords, and arpeggios, but that's where it is at.  You can learn riffs until the cows come home, but learning riffs, "note for note", doesn't really teach you how to mix everything together.  Once you learn all that "other" stuff, your bass player can start playing something he came up with and you can derive riffs from the things he's playing and not have to resort to doubling what he's playing (and vice versa).



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 04:24:21 AM
Sorry for the necro.

My birthday was on Sunday, and my parents decided to buy me a guitar. I've been interested in learning for quite a long time, but never really had the balls to go and pick one up.

The problem is, I really have no idea how to choose one. What I should buy along with it? Does anyone know of a good program for learning? I would go for private lessons, but I'm broke.

I'm leaning towards a nylon-string, maybe a Yamaha C40? I've heard nothing but good things about it.

Please mention anything I'm forgetting about.

Thanks.

I didn't know anything about acoutsics when I got my first.  I needed one because my college dorm did not allow electrics.  I got a nylon string because my uncle suggested one, but I wasn't interested in classical music and was kicking myself for not getting a steel string.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 04:29:20 AM
Thirdly, don't spend a lot of money until you know if you'll stick with it. A few years learning the basics on a cheapo and you will be ready to move up to a mid-range instrument and know what to look for in one.

YES!!!!

Beginners are so lucky these days with all the quality cheap guitars available.  I remember when the Korean stuff sucked, but it all seems really good now, and is CHEAP!  Yamaha seems to make really good beginner stuff.

I own a Baby Taylor that I bought for airline travel.  It sounds great and was cheap.  However, you do have to make tuning adjustments because of the very short scale.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 21, 2008, 08:10:54 AM
Wow, that's a lot of replies in a row.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 21, 2008, 08:14:54 PM
Wow, that's a lot of replies in a row.  :awesome_for_real:

My computer is in an office outside my house and I got locked out, without my keys.  My roommate had company over and I didn't want to bother him, so I stayed up super late and posted to some old threads.  I ended up sleeping on the floor, using my backpack as a pillow, until he got up and unlocked the house.

It was a weird night.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 25, 2008, 08:31:01 AM
Dunlop 1.5mm. Don't like anything else, I wear the fuck out of them. Most are rounded way down, I need some new ones. I started on mediums, always broke them and they just didn't have enough dig for heavy palm-muting I was doing back then. Got a 1.5mm and never looked back, perfect thickness. Also use my fingers a lot. Raph has some nice technique. Found a vid of the guy I keep mentioning from the ren faire, Conrado Garcia on charango: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvHyTs_EMOI I want that technique! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2xmbm2rTik

(http://www.keynshammusic.co.uk/prodimages/1.5d.jpg)

On the topic of playing accessories, my first slide was a bic lighter, held between my index and ring finger with the middle holding it down. Now I can only play slide with my middle finger. Currently using a chromed steel slide. I bought three originally, the steel one and two made of glass. One glass was too thin, the other is nice and thick but it's blown glass and not straight, so tough to chord.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 25, 2008, 08:53:40 AM
I play on my middle too. I prefer glass on acoustic, and steel on electric (but I hardly ever play slide on electric...if I had a specific guitar to set up the bridge for it, I would).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 25, 2008, 06:34:48 PM
Thanks for the compliment, Sky. :) It's funny how posting a video got so much more of a response (not here, but everywhere) than just posting an audio track.

I play slide with a medium glass slide, on the index finger, in my lap, usually, and sometimes with the guitar held normally, on my middle finger.

And when I play slide, I am usually doing it on the '62 Gibson L000 acoustic, where it just *screams* -- totally awesome sound. That guitar has a very old-timey sort of sound to it, and it just really clicks with slide. Plus the action is a bit high anyway. Or I'll play it on the (also '62) Gibson Melody Maker, where I have to be very careful and light and am usually doing it fuzzed out.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 26, 2008, 05:48:22 AM
I don't know what the hell I was saying.. I actually use my slide on my pinky. Mostly open E or G. For whatever reason that I can't explain, I like playing in both tunings with a capo on the first fret. Especially open E/capo 1st. I just love that. My acoustic isn't set up for slide, but it still works well. Pretty interchangeable.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 26, 2008, 07:15:27 AM
I don't want to bang up the SG with the slide, I play on my old Cort that I set the action way high and keep in open G. I need to get back to playing more, this whole home buying/construction/moving thing has been hell on my free time. It is nice to finally have a place where I can open up the amp and play without bothering the landlord, or sit out in my backyard with birds accompanying my acoustic. My recorder sits in a box somewhere  :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 26, 2008, 10:47:52 PM
What do you guys use for recording software?  I've got a super old version of Cubasis that is really buggy and has had latency issues with some of the operating systems I've used.  I'm itching to set up my computer to do some basic recording - all my hardware and guitar stuff are right next to it, but I need a low cost solution because this is just for fun.

I've used Kristal and loved that, but it doesn't support MIDI and I've got a Boss DR-660 drum machine for my drums, so I need MIDI to make everything synch up.

Or perhaps I just need a good software solution for the drums.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 27, 2008, 12:09:00 AM
I still use Acid Pro, SoundForge, and now I have added some VSTs to the mix. Drums for me come from either an Alesis SR-16 or loops.

Acid has supported MIDI since version 5 I think. I have done a few things that were half-and-half.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 27, 2008, 08:33:52 AM
I have Cubase and Live on Windows, and only old versions of ProTools on Mac. I don't do much recording anymore, so I just fuck around with garage band....which is actually pretty good for simple home recording.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 27, 2008, 08:36:53 AM
I WANT A MACBOOK PRO.

What? Did I yell. I really do want one. Preferably with a Digi002+protools. Right now I'm using a Fostex MR8HD, it's a really cool unit for basic demo/ideas.

Anyway, I do need to look into recording software, too. Anyone use Audacity?

I've also lamented not having a drum machine to play to. I have a serious love/hate with drum machines, because I hate uninteresting drums and I'm very into syncopation and horrid at notation for time. Once I get unpacked at the new house, my drums are coming out of storage and I'll try to record them. It'll bring out the limitations of my recorder, but paired with software it might be perfect for my basic recording needs. I have to check if it's got a click track, I meander.

Raph, I hope you're using midi to control that Alesis or something. I'm a miditard and putting in step patterns on that unit was TEH DEBIL. We had one in the band room, and doing anything complex on it was impossible, even when blasted on cocaine. The Boss was much better, but still waaaay too limited. And those are pretty much your choices for drum machines. I need a computer package or something, but then things start getting too complex, because I don't want to have to boot the computer to record, I like solid state units I can lug around. I believe I've had this gripe before in this thread :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 27, 2008, 08:39:05 AM
Uh, yeah, I use audacity, but just for touching up some things. I've never really found much use for sound editors actually. Or post-production in general! Just like to get my shit right through my gear and press record.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 27, 2008, 11:21:54 AM
It's nice you can play bass, guitar, drums and sing all at the same time and have enough tracks to record it all, too!  :awesome_for_real:

I can only record four live tracks at a time, meaning one 'song' on my Fostex would be the drum kit: snare, kick and two stereo room mics. Rather than bounce that down to two tracks, I'd prefer to copy it over to the pc after the performance and still have all those tracks open to mess around with if needed.

I'm very hands off, if you couldn't tell by the levels and mistakes in my recordings. I do just hit record, I don't even bother getting my shit right first.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 27, 2008, 11:35:03 AM
Nah, I can't play drums for fuck. I have two neighborhood drummers for that, if I ever need them. I also have a ton of loops and some samplers...just haven't messed with that. Got yet another beatmeister (hip hop oriented though) with all kinds of shit too. In fact, it's kind of a shame that I don't take advantage of them much..  :|

Anyhow, I'm pretty hands off like you too. I can make my way around synths and get something done really well if i put my mind to it, but I'd rather just be a simple guitar player....with someone else doing all the production work. Shit man, I still don't even have any good mics. So I can't even make a decent guitar recording either, when I'm alone at least.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 27, 2008, 11:39:54 PM

Anyway, I do need to look into recording software, too. Anyone use Audacity?

I know it is heresy but I can't stand it. Give me SoundForge or give me death. :P

Quote
Raph, I hope you're using midi to control that Alesis or something. I'm a miditard and putting in step patterns on that unit was TEH DEBIL.

I don't do it that way, I do the overlay loop way -- you set the click track going, hit the pads, and it loops and you build up the part. I do it with little quantization. Comes out much more musical, to my mind.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on August 28, 2008, 03:57:43 AM
Reaper (http://www.cockos.com/reaper/)

It's free and it's great.  Both Audacity and SoundForge are useful programs for sound design, but they don't stack up well for recording compared to other programs.

Stray: if you want to mic your amp then a cheap SM57 will be more than adequate.  You can get a good sound with that, assuming you don't want to drop several hundred on a good condensor.  Otherwise, just run the guitar directly into your computer and use some amp modeling plugin.  It will give you more control over the tone anyway.

Edit: I'm generally bored and in need of some practice, so if you guys need any mixing or drum sequencing done I'd be happy to take a stab at it.

Edit 2: Apparently Reaper might not be free anymore.  It was when I downloaded it a few months ago.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 28, 2008, 07:04:11 AM
I do the overlay loop way -- you set the click track going, hit the pads, and it loops and you build up the part. I do it with little quantization. Comes out much more musical, to my mind.
How do you program in specific parts, changes and non-repetitive beats? I was trying to program a song (prog metal I guess) for my band back in 91 and almost threw the thing out the window.

I mic my guitar with the sm58. Actually I mic everything with it, since it's my only mic :) I used to go direct from my GT6 effects unit into the board, but I've been happy with the mic/amp setup. Still want to get a decent overdrive for when I start playing out, so I'm not lugging the big GT6 board around, even if it's nice to have the versatility at my feet.

Maybe some day when my home is finished, hah. Even thinking about a set of mics for the drum kit is fantasy at this point. Guess that solves my drum tracking issue...mono drum track!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on August 28, 2008, 09:12:36 PM
Reaper (http://www.cockos.com/reaper/)

It's free and it's great.  Both Audacity and SoundForge are useful programs for sound design, but they don't stack up well for recording compared to other programs.

Kristal Audio Engine + Audacity is a great, free setup.  However, I'd like MIDI support.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 28, 2008, 11:07:15 PM
I do the overlay loop way -- you set the click track going, hit the pads, and it loops and you build up the part. I do it with little quantization. Comes out much more musical, to my mind.
How do you program in specific parts, changes and non-repetitive beats? I was trying to program a song (prog metal I guess) for my band back in 91 and almost threw the thing out the window.

I lay down one loop, bring it digital, stripe it, then play fills and the like over it, or replacing bits of it. Same if I need a second drum part.

One of the last things I do to make the drums sound better is to go over the whole drum track with a volume envelope, often beat by beat. It breaks up the sound of looping.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 04, 2008, 02:23:01 PM
Bought meself a new beater guitar. I think it's a Hamer PRS copy... I don't know, I got it for cheap.

It's black like this Washburn:

(http://www.backstreetsymphony.co.uk/g3.jpg)

Except no floyd rose (more of a PRS trem on it).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 04, 2008, 02:31:45 PM
I've been playing a mexican Fender Tele as my beater guitar.  I'm thinking the only good use for a mexican Fender is for practicing Who moves.  What a worthless chunk of wood. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 04, 2008, 02:32:23 PM
Ah here's a pic. It's not a bad guitar at all for under $300

(http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/2792/hamerfk2.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 04, 2008, 02:42:18 PM
If you put my hands on a Mexican Tele, I could surely make it sound good Nebu. They're not bad guitars (although there can be a few lemons, I'll give you that). [edit] I mean, setting it up wise!


The Hamer is a Hamer Studio, I believe. Still not sure! The left "wing" is higher than the right, which doesn't seem to be the case with Studio pics I've seen. It's more like a PRS (sexy).

Anyhow, it's a helluva lot better guitar than anything else for $300, for sure. The pickups are duncan designed, which, more or less, makes them duncans.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on September 04, 2008, 02:49:32 PM
Quote
Anyhow, it's a helluva lot better guitar than anything else for $300, for sure

I like my Ibanez ART-100 i got for $300.  Don't know about comparison to the Hamer, but i dig it. 

On a side note what has been your (a collective you for anyone) experience with tremolo bar (Bigsby, Fender, Floyd Rose, Kahler etc).  I've heard they lose tuning like a motherfucker, which has always deterred me from getting a nice archtop or semi-hollow with one on it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 04, 2008, 03:02:47 PM
I almost bought an Ibanez actually (not an Art, but an archtop). It was my second choice. They are a good deal for the money.

Floyd Roses are sturdy as all fuck. And the coolest sounding/most versatile ones to boot. They're just a bitch when they do break. And kind of daunting to newbs, even if you're just tuning or re-stringing. Bigsby's really don't work any better than Strat/Fender ones. But they're doable. You can't go crazy with them and really divebomb, but they're fairly low-maintenance.

Second after Floyd Rose is Fender's other, less talked about trem system -- the jag/jazzmaster one. They work well. It's the guitar that created the surf sound, after all. You can get pretty deep with them, and stay in tune, but it's nothing like a floyd rose either. Thing is, the problem with these guitars is their bridges in general (doesn't matter if you use the trem or not). The whole thing is basically broken by design. The saddles are the most assbackwards, retarded things ever conceived.

(http://www.jag-stang.com/JaguarHtml/Images/jagBridge_stock.jpg)

See the little rivets? They're very shallow, and your strings are prone to just pop out or skip when you bend or play hard. A lot of players back in the day used huge strings on these guitars to combat it (like .014's and up). Now there's replacement saddles (TUSQ's, specifically), but it's a little extra cash...and they're hard to find now.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2008, 05:35:33 AM
Man, this little Hamer is badass. I'm upgrading it from beater to keeper. Very well constructed for a cheapo. I needed a rocker like this.  8-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 05, 2008, 09:58:26 AM
Someday I might get a guitar with a bar on it. In the past, I've always removed them because I use them so rarely, but for some more rockabilly/ventures type stuff they are nice. I love the bar on my SG for my main guitar, though. A lot of folks use Bigby's with SGs.

(http://www.everythingsg.com/images/identify/photos/SG_61_Reissue_1.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2008, 11:27:36 AM
One of my favorite guitarists (Greg Sage) uses an SG with a bigsby. He kind of does the warped Neil Young/Jeff Beck thing, but in his rhythms. Love that shit. link (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/so_young.mp3)

There isn't anyone who sounds like him really.

Kevin Shields and Bilinda Butcher kind of do the same thing, but in a less frenetic way. link (http://homepage.mac.com/kthompsen/music/soon.mp3)

Lots of neat stuff with trem bars really! I like to have them rather than not. If I want to use them they're there.

[edit] fixed links!



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on September 05, 2008, 11:59:12 AM
Thanks for your input Stray.

Quote
your strings are prone to just pop out or skip when you bend or play hard

My resonator/dobro used to do that, but for a totally different reason.  The damned high E would jump out of the bridge so i cut it a little deeper and now i have no problems.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2008, 12:29:43 PM
Welcome.

Just found out that Hamer is an "ST3" model. Retailed new at $800. No wonder.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on September 05, 2008, 01:59:26 PM
nice fucking deal!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 12, 2008, 08:09:06 PM
Wandered into a guitar shop in Encinitas today, mostly old stuff on the walls -- an 1898 Gibson, among other things. Signs everywhere saying "don't play anything without us helping you." Spotted a Larrivee, asked how it sounded. I still regret not getting that one I saw in that other store two years ago. Shop guy said "one of my favorites in here, wanna try?" So he got it down and I jammed for a while... in the middle he says "You know Leo Kottke's coming to town? I mention it because you sound like that kind of player." I took that as a compliment. :)

I didn't buy it though -- it sounded too much like my current guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on September 12, 2008, 10:46:32 PM
The "Raph Sound"?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 13, 2008, 12:03:30 AM
Heh, no. I don't claim to have anything like that! But there's certain things I need a guitar to be able to do -- it's got to growl and it's got to be sensitive to harmonics, and I need to be able to get certain tones from it, and this one felt a little "dead" in some ways. Its full tone was, like I said, too similar to my Blueridge, and it wasn't as responsive to harmonics either. The growl was pretty good, but i couldn't get the more bell-like tones, and the string separation when chording was just OK.

I sound like such a geek there. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 13, 2008, 03:05:42 AM
I'm geekin' out right with ya. Understood what you said  :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on September 13, 2008, 09:58:12 AM
I think I followed that too, and I'm still mostly a drummer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on September 13, 2008, 02:26:39 PM
I more than understood, and that is why I have such a hard time finding guitars to play.  Most just don't have the right feel or sound I am going for.  Some sure play nice and people tend to soil themselves over the name and whatnot, but I just don't like the way they play or sound.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 13, 2008, 02:37:20 PM
Finding a guitar that feels good is easy.  Doing a good setup and finding the right neck width and radius is most of it.  Finding a guitar that sounds good is the hard part.  It takes time and money.  Most of the pros I played with owned several guitars that they could swap for tone.  All that made being a crappy bass player wonderful.  I just found myself a nice chunk of wood (like my old precision) and I was gtg. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Engels on September 20, 2008, 10:21:37 AM
world record speed guitar (http://view.break.com/545325)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 20, 2008, 09:38:42 PM
That's kind of what I was saying about my SG, once I played it, I knew it was my guitar. Instantly. I'm so glad to have it, it makes playing so much better, it reacts to my grip and really allows me to focus on playing because I never worry about the feel or sound of the guitar. It even sounds nice acoustically.

I've also played a bunch of Gibsons I absolutely hated, actually I've never played one I've even liked except mine. When I was trying out amps, I went through a Guitar Center trying to find something to play, I played ten (!!) SGs and a couple Les Pauls to no avail.

Getting spoiled can suck too. Since I got the Baby T, it's tough to go back to my Alvarez. Just a bit less responsive and the tone is deader and less full, even though it's a jumbo. The Baby is just an amazing guitar, the notes ring out almost unrealistically for a $250 "cheap" guitar. Way more overtones.

Raph, the last time a guitar store owner commented on my playing, I was on a strat (the 50th anniversary iirc) and he said he thought my style was rockabilly  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 21, 2008, 12:41:08 AM
Yep, that's the danger of ordering online and such. There are variations/factors in the wood in even same model instruments. You'd be doing OK going custom shop, but production models can be hit and miss. Amp-wise, it's a different story. If I know what one sounds like (and I've played tons), I'll just find a good deal online. My Jazzmaster is also another exception... It's a Jap model, made from alder (not Ash like the US reissues...or the originals). I knew what I was getting into. It was still a good deal though. I wouldn't even call it exactly a Jazzmaster as I have it now either.. It's been modded. I may just mod it more, and cram a humbucker under the bridge (then it definitely won't sound like a jm).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on September 21, 2008, 07:58:03 AM
That's kind of what I was saying about my SG, once I played it, I knew it was my guitar. Instantly. I'm so glad to have it, it makes playing so much better, it reacts to my grip and really allows me to focus on playing because I never worry about the feel or sound of the guitar. It even sounds nice acoustically.

I've also played a bunch of Gibsons I absolutely hated, actually I've never played one I've even liked except mine. When I was trying out amps, I went through a Guitar Center trying to find something to play, I played ten (!!) SGs and a couple Les Pauls to no avail.

Getting spoiled can suck too. Since I got the Baby T, it's tough to go back to my Alvarez. Just a bit less responsive and the tone is deader and less full, even though it's a jumbo. The Baby is just an amazing guitar, the notes ring out almost unrealistically for a $250 "cheap" guitar. Way more overtones.

Raph, the last time a guitar store owner commented on my playing, I was on a strat (the 50th anniversary iirc) and he said he thought my style was rockabilly  :awesome_for_real:

That's the exact same experience I had with my 50th anniversary Strat when I played it in the shop. I always wanted a starburst Fender a la Rory Gallagher but after picking this one up (classic Clapton b&w) I didn't care. Also I had a lot of people were telling me to buy a Les Paul but I never felt that comfortable with the feel (or pricetag) even the originals, though I would like to own one someday.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 21, 2008, 07:59:39 AM
Umm, if you can afford an original Les Paul, and still be picky, then I envy you. Just one pickup costs $10,000 now.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on September 21, 2008, 08:11:01 AM
Didn't know that at the time an original cost about $5000.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 21, 2008, 11:02:48 AM
Well, it depends on the year. By original, I assumed you meant 57-63ish. When Gibson's humbucker's were still in the PAF/Patent Applied For stage. Like I said, even the pups are high priced.. The guitars themselves range in the 80k area. There's a lot mythical/mojo mumbo jumbo surrounding just the pickups (literally like the Pick of Destiny... not only was it "mojo" for the Les Paul's... but there are silly ideas surrounding them just because guys like Keith play one almost exclusively in the Tele neck...thus creating the Stones sound, or EVH with his single pickup striped Charvel..thus conquering arena rock with it).

Late 60's and onwards are in the 10k range these days. But anyways, yeah, I see what you're saying.

There is a technical reason for the difference though, not just the voodoo bullshit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on September 21, 2008, 04:51:37 PM
Oh by original I mean not a copy like Epiphone etc.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 21, 2008, 08:03:31 PM
Ah..  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 01, 2008, 09:07:40 AM
I just got in a couple books from amazon last week, and this is one I took a chance on, after getting an excellent fretboard book in the same series by the author:

http://www.amazon.com/Chord-Tone-Soloing-Guitarists-Improvising/dp/0634083651

Wow. This book takes a lot of the good bits in other instructional books and puts it together in a very cohesive way. I'm starting slow with the basics as the author suggests, even though a lot of it is already below my level since I solo pretty decently. But the way he's got it laid out, it builds very nicely on the CAGED system for the fretboard to proper chord changes, scale choice, and of course the point of the book, highlighting chord tones across changes (and implying changes). Very understated book, seems pretty simplistic at first but it's my practice schedule for the next...however long.

I've admitted in the past some serious holes in my knowledge, it's so amazing to find a book that does a good job addressing exactly my weak points.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 01, 2008, 10:45:01 AM
Cool, I might just pick it up myself.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 06, 2008, 02:31:15 AM
Cool bluegrassy blues duo from Oregon..

Sidestreet Reny (http://www.myspace.com/sidestreetreny)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 08, 2008, 01:30:12 PM
Can anyone recommend a good fingerpicking technique series/book?  I've decided to start playing my acoustic more so that my girlfriend and I can sing duets and I really want to improve beyond flatpicking. 

Thanks!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 08, 2008, 01:40:54 PM
My finger technique is awful, though I play about half the time with my fingers. I learned early and then spent a long time with bad habits, so it sounds good but makes instructors cringe. Raph might be able to point you in the right direction. I have a Travis picking book that's good if your into that style, there's one called Beginning Acoustic Blues that's good for that style, or you could look into a classical style beginner book.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 08, 2008, 05:07:32 PM
I'd start with picking a style of music you love from the following choices: country, folk, blues.

Then you can get going on alternating bass picking to start with, almost clawhammer style, and work your way up. The thing is that the WAY you work your way up varies a bit by musical style, so the beginner books tend to focus on one or the other. Like country will show Travis style next where a blues book might show walking bass instead, that sort of thing.

Classical is a whole other kettle of fish -- you'll be forced to work with standard notation instead of tab, dunno how you feel about that.

I am in London and all my books are in San Diego, so I can't cite titles at you. :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 09, 2008, 10:10:05 AM
I'm thinking more folk/bluegrass.  I'm heading to Memphis this weekend to hit a few guitar stores to look at guitars and books (Barnes & Noble).  I've been playing my bass a lot lately and I really need to admit to myself that I'm a crappy guitar player and start devoting the practice time.  I'm debating between buying a classical guitar for the larger fingerboard just to get my hand in shape.  I have a Takoma that I enjoy, but I don't play it well without a pick. 

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/Aaguitar.jpg/300px-Aaguitar.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 11, 2008, 10:35:11 AM
I learned from this one for folk, found it in a used bookstore somewhere.

How to Play Better Guitar, Jerry Silverman (http://www.amazon.com/Play-Better-Guitar-Jerry-Silverman/dp/0385005792/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223746685&sr=1-1)

I am sure there are other books around these days! But basically, you want to start with alternating bass, then walking bass and picking patterns, such as Travis.

Bluegrass is often flatpicked btw.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 12, 2008, 11:11:06 AM
Thanks Raph.  I'll check it out.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 13, 2008, 09:12:59 AM
A couple of sites suggested that I try this book: The Art of Contemporary Travis Picking, by Mark Hanson (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0936799005).  I'm going to give it a shot.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 14, 2008, 07:49:43 AM
I've got that book, it seems nice. I haven't done much with it because my thumb is retarded.

In my quest to find the right strings, I think I've finally come close. I bought a set of Ernie Ball 11s and swapped in a 6th string from a pack of 10s because my guitar is set up for 9s still, it buzzes a bit. If I stick with 11s, I'll have to rework some of the setup and hopefully not throw off the beautiful setup I got from the shop :)

11s are a motherfucker to bend for very long. I had been up to about 2-1/2 hour jam sessions, and yesterday I shredded my fingers after an hour of mostly just doing rhythms with only about 1/4 bendy solo jamming. I hope my fingers are up to it, because 11s feel right in just about every respect. Maybe it's the acoustic playing that has me favoring the heavier strings with a more rigid setup?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 14, 2008, 10:39:34 AM
I have 9's on the electric, and I go nuts bending every which way when I play it, because I am so used to 13s on the acoustic.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on October 14, 2008, 11:08:02 AM
The guitar I use for playing slide uses 13/17/24(steel not wound)/35/46/56. The steel 24 is really hard to find luckily quite hard to snap also and when I haven't played consistently for a while this guitar cuts the fingers off me but great for the slide playin. I get funny looks in the guitar shop when I ask for one but I'll usually settle for a 22 steel.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 14, 2008, 11:16:40 AM
Have you looked at www.juststrings.com for the heavier steel strings?

They seem to have everything I need at decent prices.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on October 14, 2008, 01:37:28 PM
For some odd reason I never really think to buy stuff for my guitar on the net. I did once buy some lefthanded thumbpicks though as they were nowhere to be found, if I ever break a 24 I'll be ordering from that site thanks for that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 14, 2008, 01:45:34 PM
I have 9's on the electric, and I go nuts bending every which way when I play it, because I am so used to 13s on the acoustic.
I'm going to work on the 11s for a while because they feel so good. If they tear up my fingers too much I'll just have to suck it up and go back to 10s. 9s are too thin, I really like to power into bends. I've been breaking strings more lately and talking with the guy at the local shop to figure out why, he had me pull down a guitar and play. I never noticed how fucking savagely I attack with a pick. Well, I knew I was heavy-handed, but I blast the shit out of the strings, and my 1st strings are breaking right over the bridge pickup, where I generally hit the hardest.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 14, 2008, 01:58:44 PM
Funny. I'm the opposite. I've been playing 11's and even larger for years, but I'd rather go 10's or 9's these days.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 14, 2008, 02:14:01 PM
As you get older, lighter strings become attractive.  I found that as I play less and less per week that I lose a lot of speed and technique.  Using lighter strings allows me to keep some of the playing subtleties at the cost of richer tones.  I used to play some heavy damn cables on my bass 20 years ago.  Now, I play lighter strings and just give up the deeper tones.  As a hack guitarist, I guess I can't comment as well there. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2008, 09:03:42 AM
Oh, I'm a hack. I've just been able to play a lot more recently  :drill:

Still digging the Chord Tone Soloing book, though I've taken a break to work through the author's MI workbook on Fretboard Mastery. Because it's waaaaay past fucking time I can map out the notes on the fretboard. I'm much further along than I had thought, but it's time to plug the gaps, so I can break out of pattern-based playing. One thing about pattern-based playing, though, is that as long as I don't look at the fretboard, I can play in any key :) My favorite is probably Fb.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on October 15, 2008, 10:32:17 AM
Quote
My favorite is probably Fb

I see what you did there.  a music funny.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2008, 12:12:41 PM
 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 15, 2008, 11:05:52 PM
You go through more books...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2008, 11:31:22 PM
I still didn't get that one book he mentioned like I said I would.. but I want to.

I've not been very good with books in general. I read the fuck out of guitar tech and recording books though. Things with a technical/engineering and recording effects bent. I wish I had the resources to learn how to be a luthier or something too. And wished I knew enough about electronics to build my own amplifiers, stompboxes, and preamps.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 16, 2008, 07:00:20 AM
You go through more books...
I do work at a library and my fiancee's a librarian. Lots of time at B&N :) Anyway, it's mostly searching for books that I connect with. Most have a chapter or two I can integrate but most doesn't sink in, and instructors are too expensive, especially since I have to travel a half hour to get to a decent one.

The two I'm working on now, along with a couple others, are pretty much exactly what I need for fretboard mastery and basic theory. I've got my ear most of the way back, but I still like tab books to get the nuances I might miss, and I do make corrections in bad tabs, which is pretty helpful. If I had more time in the day, I'd go back to transcribing stuff in blank tab books, but I'd rather spend my time playing.

I'm really happy with where I'm at right now, though. As I've said, it's long overdue to fill in the knowledge gaps and I'm a good enough player that I owe it to myself. Along with making a little progress singing and playing. The last really big hurdle is thumb training and maybe reading notation a little faster.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 19, 2008, 09:23:13 PM
My latest noodling around... only half guitar. Hmm.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/10/19/the-sunday-song-harvest-festival/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 20, 2008, 07:08:30 AM
My girlfriend and I have started to do some singing/playing and this may be the time to build small recording setup to start capturing some of my original stuff.  Any suggestions?  I have mics, monitors, cabinets, etc.  I just want something to do the recording. 

Is there a reasonable (read: inexpensive) 4-8 channel out there worth buying?

What effects should I consider (rack mount, multi units, compressors, EQ, etc)? 

Drum machines worth a damn?

Basically, what is the minimum I need to record decent quality composed arrangements?  I can play all the stringed instruments, keyboards, and any brass/sax parts.  The last time I did any serious home recording was duing the fostex cassette 4-track days. 

Any input appreciated.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 20, 2008, 09:21:14 AM
I like my MR8HD (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR8HD-8Track-Digital-Recorder-with-40GB-Hard-Drive?sku=240341). You can get 8 tracks with bouncing, but it's basically a 4 track. I've meant to start post-processing on the pc, but that's the part where I get lazy. Actually, before that.

I've decided I don't like any drum machines. The one I used to use was a Boss DRsomething 808, maybe. I really have an abiding hate for the model Raph will suggest :) But Raph uses MIDI, so it's probably easier to set up. I used the pads to play the beat into it, and tried to manually program some stuff step-wise. I'm setting up my drums as soon as I can cobble together a little riser in the garage, will record them when I get a couple more mics.

I just watched Keith Moon at the Isle of Wight and he only had three crash cymbals, set at 10, 12 and 2. Awesome! Keith Moon amazes me. Then I was watching the Ginger cat play with Cream and Blind Faith and, well, he sucks. I don't like drummers that lose the beat when they're putting in fills (acknowledging I'm a shitty drummer, though!).

Raph: the drums seem forced and inorganic (and not just because of the aforementioned feelings about your machine, heh). I wish your widget allowed me to reduce volume :) Anyway, the interaction between the guitar chop chords and drums was weird, imo. Note: I don't like modern jazz (but I love old jazz, Django and Basie stuff). Nice tinkling piano, the acoustic patch line. Boo on the synth patch (personal dislike, again). Potential in the progression, but for some reason I kept stalling out around 12-14 seconds in. Sorry this is kinda rough criticism, I must be grumpy :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 20, 2008, 09:24:53 AM
The person I know who made drum machines sound good was.....

a drummer.

Go figure.

It's really not so much about the tool (not saying real drums aren't better!).. They can sound pretty good.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 20, 2008, 09:47:37 AM
I just watched Keith Moon at the Isle of Wight and he only had three crash cymbals, set at 10, 12 and 2. Awesome! Keith Moon amazes me. Then I was watching the Ginger cat play with Cream and Blind Faith and, well, he sucks. I don't like drummers that lose the beat when they're putting in fills (acknowledging I'm a shitty drummer, though!).

Keith plays drums like it's just another instrument... it's not about backbeat, it's about being part of the music.  There used to be an old joke that went something like "did you hear the band that went down in a plane crash?  The headlines stated that 3 musicians and a drummer died."   I love Keith, Bonham, and Peart for this reason.  All three are musicians rather than just being drummers. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 20, 2008, 11:12:41 AM
Nebu:

First off, I would go digital. I have a rackmount compressor and a reverb unit gathering dust under my desk. Record to hard drive, do everything else digitally.

You'll still want multiple channels of input into the computer -- a mixer with XLR and 1/4 inch inputs and effects loop (in case you do want to add outboard stuff). I manage to use my old Tascam 4 track for this -- the tape sits idle, I just use the mixing capabilities and go through the line out.

Drum machines -- I just use the one I happen to know. Pick the one you like the sound of. I don't do the drum machine via MIDI, actually.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 20, 2008, 11:17:18 AM
Nebu:

First off, I would go digital. I have a rackmount compressor and a reverb unit gathering dust under my desk. Record to hard drive, do everything else digitally.

You'll still want multiple channels of input into the computer -- a mixer with XLR and 1/4 inch inputs and effects loop (in case you do want to add outboard stuff). I manage to use my old Tascam 4 track for this -- the tape sits idle, I just use the mixing capabilities and go through the line out.

Raph,

I saw you guys mentioning software a few pages back.  Should I just go with those recommendations or do you have other suggestions.  I'm used to recording bass and guitar by direct box, but have a new room with great acoustics that I may start live micing with instead.  If you have any opinions on ways to do this, I'd be grateful.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 20, 2008, 11:26:34 AM
Raph: the drums seem forced and inorganic (and not just because of the aforementioned feelings about your machine, heh). I wish your widget allowed me to reduce volume :) Anyway, the interaction between the guitar chop chords and drums was weird, imo. Note: I don't like modern jazz (but I love old jazz, Django and Basie stuff). Nice tinkling piano, the acoustic patch line. Boo on the synth patch (personal dislike, again). Potential in the progression, but for some reason I kept stalling out around 12-14 seconds in. Sorry this is kinda rough criticism, I must be grumpy :)

No worries on the rough criticism, I am used to getting it since I never wait until something is baked to post it up. :)

The drums are straight out of the machine, I didn't program them at all, So I am unsurprised they sound inorganic!

This one was a pain to put together, rhythmically. I did the guitar part first over the drums, and it's just tricky to do right all the way through. I got it better at middle than at the opening. The bass is a mess too. It's really frustrating to hear something in your head and hear how snappy it would sound if you just could play it right! Sigh. I couldn't quite find a horns patch I was happy with.

I'll have to go dig up the chords I used for the progression, lots of crazy jazzy chords I will need to figure out what they are. :)

You know, I didn't try mixing it without the drums... maybe i should try that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 20, 2008, 11:34:05 AM
Raph,

I saw you guys mentioning software a few pages back.  Should I just go with those recommendations or do you have other suggestions.  I'm used to recording bass and guitar by direct box, but have a new room with great acoustics that I may start live micing with instead.  If you have any opinions on ways to do this, I'd be grateful.

There are a lot of software choices. Personally, I prefer using something more studio-oriented than something that is pure audio recording, but others prefer the reverse.

By audio oriented I mean stuff like SoundForge, Audacity. You're working with raw sound.

By studio-oriented I mean something like Cakewalk, Acid, etc.

If you're less into techno and MIDI and the like, then you may prefer the stuff that is not aimed in that direction, but I know folks who swear by Reason.

Acid, Garage Band, those are loop-based. Which I find really handy even if I am doing full length recording, because you can stripe stuff, cut and paste really easily, etc, and mix MIDI and acoustic stuff easily.

You can pick up the lowest end Acid for around $50 at Walmart or Target, and it might be nice for getting your feet wet.

As far as using mics -- I have the following set up:

Mic -> mic preamp -> Tascam -> sound card -> Acid
Mic -> Tascam
Drum machine - > Tascam
Guitar/bass -> Acoustic amp -> line out to Tascam (use for mixing the line and the acoustic signal)
Keyboard -> Midi -> Acid (for MIDI patches)
Keyboard -> line out to sound card (for recording the keyboard directly)

I tend to use the pre-amped mic for room and overall detail, and the other mic as a closely miked instrument mic, or for vocals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: IainC on October 20, 2008, 11:43:26 AM
The person I know who made drum machines sound good was.....

a drummer.

Go figure.

It's really not so much about the tool (not saying real drums aren't better!).. They can sound pretty good.
Chris Vrenna (Nine Inch Nails) is pretty much the reference for digital drumming.

Years ago I was at a symposium in London where Ginger Baker, Chad Smith and Bernard Purdie were talking about acoustic vs digital instruments. All good stuff then Chris came on stage and proved them all wrong.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on October 20, 2008, 11:55:14 AM
(had a whole thing written out here but it go lost - thanks Internet)

Nebu: what Raph said.  Pick something in your price range, or keep using what you're already familiar with.  The major differences between everything (except for pro-tools) are what plug-in formats they use (look for VST compatibility) and the UI.

Stray/IainC: This is my friend from Orlando. (http://www.myspace.com/thelowerrhythm)  He's not a drummer at all, but he makes some of the coolest percussion sequences.  Be warned, his music is a bit odd.  He works primarily in FL Studio, and he makes his own VSTs for some of his synths.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 20, 2008, 12:17:58 PM
Keith plays drums like it's just another instrument... it's not about backbeat, it's about being part of the music. 
That's what I said (and caught a LOT of shit for) when I was playing bass primarily. I'm a musician who plays a few instruments. I do not play them like I'm "supposed to", I play them the way that feels right and best captures what I hear mentally to the best of my limited capacity to carry out. I would add Mitch Mitchell to your list. I also like some slightly more traditional drummer if they drip soul, like the cat playing on my very favoritist James Brown disc (one you MUST own, go buy it now, I'll wait) Say It Live And Loud from Dallas TX.

I don't inherently dislike drum machines, it's just that it's so difficult to get the kind of drumming I like out of one without being a complete master. And honestly, NIN's style of music is much better suited to a machine than Mr. Brown's would be :)

Since we're talking a bit of recording, I am still at the bare-bones stage.

61 SG -> Boss GT6 -> Fender Deluxe Reverb 65 -> Shure SM58 -> MR8HD
Vocals -> Shure SM58 -> MR8HD
Bass -> MR8HD (laziness)
Acoustic -> Shure SM58 -> MR8HD or
Acoustic -> MR8HD (which sounds like dookie)

I need some new mics, a couple SM57s and something for the kick drum /at least/. SM57s would serve duty for almost everything from amps to ambient to drum miking whether I go stereo or positional or whatever.

I used a cheap copy of acid that came bundled with something back in the 90s and liked it. I should've cowboyed up for a recording setup before I bought the house :) MacBook Pro + Digi002 *drool*


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 20, 2008, 12:24:42 PM
(had a whole thing written out here but it go lost - thanks Internet)

Nebu: what Raph said.  Pick something in your price range, or keep using what you're already familiar with.  The major differences between everything (except for pro-tools) are what plug-in formats they use (look for VST compatibility) and the UI.

Stray/IainC: This is my friend from Orlando. (http://www.myspace.com/thelowerrhythm)  He's not a drummer at all, but he makes some of the coolest percussion sequences.  Be warned, his music is a bit odd.  He works primarily in FL Studio, and he makes his own VSTs for some of his synths.

That's cool. I know some dnb and hip hop producers who do cool beats as well... I just meant that my drummer friend knew how to turn a pad into a bonafide instrument, and be pretty dynamic about it. He could get a lot of use out of one without sequencing... just improvising with a live band.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 20, 2008, 12:32:57 PM
Here's a setup I found useful:  I use a Roland TD8 (http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?ObjectId=231) along with one of Roland's Snare Drum Triggers (http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?ObjectId=628&ParentId=98) to capture a more natural performance.  If I'm not using the manual trigger with a pair of sticks I can also trigger the sound module with MIDI.

Also, a lot of the MIDI sound libraries are starting to have very good drum kits if you don't want a hardware solution.  For example, Garritan's Jazz Brush Kit (http://www.garritan.com/jazz.html) is excellent, especially when coupled to a real person playing a good triggering system like a VDrum set that understands velocity, etc.  MIDI generated drum lines can be made to sound good if you take care to vary the timing of the hits and apply random velocities, as too perfect timing for drums just sounds 'wrong', no matter how good of a sound library is attached.

Good trigger setups and libraries are expensive, but totally worth it for really professional results.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 20, 2008, 04:48:50 PM
Appreciate all the input.  I'm going to see what I can put together for $1000 or so.  My new livingroom is empty and has some really amazing acoustics.  If I can con my girlfriend into doing some vocal tracks, I may post a song or two once I get them to a point that I can live with them.  Of course, this may be a month or two down the road. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 20, 2008, 11:40:38 PM
You know, I didn't try mixing it without the drums... maybe i should try that.

MUCH better, I think.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/10/20/a-much-better-harvest-festival/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 21, 2008, 07:09:45 AM
Still gets stuck at Buffering... after ten to fourteen seconds. Sounds way better without the drums confusing things, though.

I also need to get off my ass and start recording again. No excuse at this point :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 21, 2008, 08:16:16 AM
Here's a direct link:

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/HarvestFestival2.mp3


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 21, 2008, 08:21:00 AM
Quote
This Account Has Exceeded Its CPU Quota


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 21, 2008, 09:26:09 AM
I just got thru, try again?

My webhosting makes me a sad panda lately.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 21, 2008, 11:40:30 AM
Hmm. Just kept stalling every .3MB, so I kept stopping and restarting the download and eventually got it all.

Like the guitar parts and the acoustic piano patch parts. Not a fan of the synth or what sounds like an accordian. If you played the piano part in real-time, you've got monster chops and my fiancee is jealous :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 21, 2008, 01:06:57 PM
That's a "trombone section" and a "trumpet." I have a few choices on the trombone section -- so maybe I will try some others. I did want that smooth sort of sound. They're orchestral patches, though, not jazz patches, which is part of why they sounds TOO smooth.

Yes, I did play the piano live in realtime (I played all the parts in realtime actually, except the now-extinct drums). I do not, however, have monster chops. :) You'll notice it's a one-handed piano part -- it just happens to be a scale I know REALLY well (blues scale in F, overlaid on top of a C13 - G13 vamp on the guitar).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 21, 2008, 03:34:48 PM
Here's a demo I put together of various sound libraries doing a Dizzy Gillespie change:

Dizzy Demo.mp3 (http://24.6.100.201/mp3/01%20Dizzy%20Demo.mp3)

So there are no real players here:  the drum line is the Garritan Jazz brush kit, the upright bass is from their Jazz package, and the piano is a Steinway Grand and the xylophone is from there Personal Orchestra package.  The solo lines were generated by Band-In-A-Box and exported as MIDI to Cakewalk Sonar.

Note that this is all MIDI, but if you listen carefully, you'll hear that all the snare drops and ride cymbals have been 'un-quantized' (or moved slightly off beat), and have had their velocities changed to indicate emphasis.  The same was applied to root-less chords for the piano part.  This makes all the difference between tricking a listener into think it's a real player playing a real instrument.  It takes time, but it's well worth it.

I bet some of the people who read this board can spot the hints that this is a MIDI generated song, but I have fooled countless listeners with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on October 21, 2008, 08:51:30 PM
For you guys still recording instruments and vocals with dynamic microphones, here's a decent, affordable condenser solution:
(http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/3426/8ballnk8.jpg) (http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/8Ball/)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 21, 2008, 10:13:36 PM
Here's a demo I put together of various sound libraries doing a Dizzy Gillespie change:

Dizzy Demo.mp3 (http://24.6.100.201/mp3/01%20Dizzy%20Demo.mp3)

all the snare drops and ride cymbals have been 'un-quantized' (or moved slightly off beat)

Back when I first learned MIDI (uh, 1993?) we called that "humanized." :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 22, 2008, 06:46:00 AM
For you guys still recording instruments and vocals with dynamic microphones, here's a decent, affordable condenser solution:

I'm still in love with my sm57 and sm58.  How does this compare?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 22, 2008, 07:49:11 AM
Yeah, I've looked at a few condensers but I like my dynamic for vocals. I like the color the sm58 adds, it's not like I have some great singing voice. The more growl the better...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on October 22, 2008, 01:01:30 PM
Oh, I've never used it.  Just did a search for cheap condensers and Blue is a fantastic manufacturer.  It also comes as a USB version.

Micing is all about finding a tone you like, of course.  Per what sky says, use the mic that works the way you like it.  A condenser should give you a much clearer and natural recording, and you can add flavor to it in the mixing stage later on.  Or you can use the mic that gives you that dirty tone you're looking for right off the bat.

For myself, I prefer the idea of a totally clean and dry recording so that the mixing possibilities are bigger.  You should be able to reproduce just about anything with the right software.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 22, 2008, 01:31:22 PM
See, I got my recording chops doing live rehearsal recordings with a boom-box. I've said before that most of the guys in studio engineering hated my guts, I have an odd ear for mixing. All I care about is a decent performance and a nice raw sound, with zero processing or production. If my guitar sounds like shit, I need to fix the guitar sound, not clean up the recording later.

I'm not slamming more produced work, it's fine for others. I just like it very garagey, because that's how I was 'raised'.

My main challenge is layering all my parts on and keeping things synced up, which is why I've considered a drum machine for a scratch track. Like doing '19 yrs old', there's a guitar intro but the bass line is a much better track to do first. But I can't time the bass intro without doing the guitar intro first. I guess I need to throw down the guitar intro, then key the bass line off that, then throw down the rest of the guitar line and maybe vocals at that point, too (to keep me honest). Recording is a pain in the ass imo :) I miss just hitting record and then playing with the band until the tape stopped.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Phildo on October 22, 2008, 01:39:10 PM
Having a scratch drum track can definitely be a huge help.  Doesn't even need to be that good as long as it keeps the time accurately, and it's more interesting to play with than a metronome.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 22, 2008, 05:43:22 PM
So one of my neighbors got one of these..

http://www.gibson.com/RobotGuitar/ (http://www.gibson.com/RobotGuitar/)


Pretty cool... It's gimmicky, and something I would never need, but it's a cool gimmick and a Les Paul besides.

Only thing that sucks is that, while it covers just about most of the tunings people use, it doesn't (and I wouldn't expect it to) cover my wacky G minor tuning.... and too much trouble to manually use the tuning pegs (it's complicated).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 23, 2008, 06:55:18 AM
Eh, I am usually in A440 on my SG all the time because I don't want to beat it up with the slide. The only song I'd want to retune for would be the Rain Song. Otoh, it would be nice to have an LED showing when a string went out of tune so you could see it before you play a bad chord. Of course, the audience would see it, too, and if you were playing with your eyes closed that could be funny...

For the price, I'd buy two guitars and keep them in the two tunings I use :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 23, 2008, 07:03:23 AM
Hell, for the price of that guitar you could buy one nice guitar and hire a full time roadie!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 23, 2008, 07:24:28 AM
Well, he got it for something like 2 grand... So I don't blame him for picking it up. You're going to pay something near that for a new LP anyways.

Personally though, I'm with you. I'd easily take two gits over one gimmicky one. I don't really like to play slide in the same neck/bridge setup as I would in standard tuning anyways (would rather have the strings raised higher in a seperate guitar, if I could).


[edit] Uh, for some reason, it's very light too.. and it's not the Studio LP. It's a regular LP. I really liked the feel of it. Most of the time, they weigh like bricks to me. This felt more like an SG. I'm not sure what the difference was... didn't seem like it using Ash or anything.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on October 23, 2008, 11:18:09 AM
Uh, for some reason, it's very light too.. and it's not the Studio LP. It's a regular LP. I really liked the feel of it. Most of the time, they weigh like bricks to me. This felt more like an SG. I'm not sure what the difference was... didn't seem like it using Ash or anything.

The body's probably got some areas hollowed out for the electronics and may be chambered like some of the other LPs on top of that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 27, 2008, 12:04:05 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsePsTEgiqU

Chet Atkins playing Vincent  :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on October 28, 2008, 04:15:07 AM
So one of my neighbors got one of these..

http://www.gibson.com/RobotGuitar/ (http://www.gibson.com/RobotGuitar/)


Pretty cool... It's gimmicky, and something I would never need, but it's a cool gimmick and a Les Paul besides.

Only thing that sucks is that, while it covers just about most of the tunings people use, it doesn't (and I wouldn't expect it to) cover my wacky G minor tuning.... and too much trouble to manually use the tuning pegs (it's complicated).

They are great. Iirc the demonstration video correctly, you can manually tune it your G minor tuning, hit a button and have as one of the custom presets. You can also manually tune one string, and then the rest will tune themselves to it.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 28, 2008, 07:05:07 PM
Woohoo, broke my cherry last night. Went to the local open mic and one of the bassist from our society was there. Despite a shitty lineup of drummers, at the last minute an amazing blues drummer came in with one of the best guitarists in the area. Nabbed a harp player and basically took over the place for an hour and a half. Good thing I had been putting in longer practice sessions with the new heavier string setup I've been using!

I opened with a minor key instrumental off Jr Well's first album, then I did Buddy Guy's version of She's 19 Years Old. Then the bassist sang what was supposed to be a slower blues but the drummer and I "misunderstood" and played it as a funk blues, which the bassist really enjoyed. Then I reprised the 19 Yrs Old riff (a very common blues) so a drunk guy could sing something incoherent. Then the good guitarist got up and did three or four tunes, I lost track after a while. One guy started to record our back and forth soloing, it was cool.

Met a couple decent musicians, got a line on a blues practice room weekly, got to jam with my favorite local guy, got the place jumping, guys yelling and girls dancing, and the owner told me I was to come back every week to play :) Feels really good to have that out of the way, but I'm glad I waited until I had some acceptable chops so I could make a decent first impression and not totally embarrass myself.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Jimbo on November 29, 2008, 03:35:11 AM
Hey my musical inclined son is wanting to try the bass.  He plays alto sax, is doing great in the jazz band @ school, plus is in another sax band from his private teacher, and can figure out a lot of things by ear.  He will take his keyboard, my old guitar, and his sax and figure out stuff from youtube or other music he has heard and right stuff up on all three.  He is more curious about it, so I've been looking in the used sections.  I don't know crap about bass guitars and what to look for, beside peevey and fender...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 29, 2008, 03:52:37 AM
You can't really go wrong with Fender. Even the Mexican ones. Precision or Jazz. There aren't that many differences between the two other than that the J is a little more flexible in sound, has a more narrow neck... it's got an offset waist too, so it's a little easier to play while sitting down. The P Bass is thee good ole standby though. No frills, straightforward, still looks cool. Not overwhelming, easy to learn on.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Grimwell on November 30, 2008, 10:31:07 AM
On the topic of kids and guitars... can anyone suggest a very good small form factor acoustic that isn't one billion dollars? One of my daughters really wants to take a stab at playing, and I will not buy anything sold at a toy retailer to get her started, but won't spend a lot of money either, until I know she's serious. She's only 8 to make that point more clear.

My guitar is too big for her to handle, and not very good in itself anyway.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 30, 2008, 12:23:36 PM
Daisy Rock (a brand with a lot of femme stylings) makes these short scale guitars.. The "Wildwood" model.

Wildwood (http://www.daisyrock.com/products/wildwood/ww_acoustic.htm)


Musician's Friend has them for $169 (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Daisy-Rock-Wildwood-Short-Scale-Acoustic-Guitar?sku=514482). That shouldn't be too expensive, right? I mean... You're lucky to get anything decent that is cheaper than that (and yes, these are decent.. they're using typical guitar woods.. not some easily warpable shit that toys would have).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on November 30, 2008, 01:34:22 PM
Hey my musical inclined son is wanting to try the bass.  He plays alto sax, is doing great in the jazz band @ school, plus is in another sax band from his private teacher, and can figure out a lot of things by ear.  He will take his keyboard, my old guitar, and his sax and figure out stuff from youtube or other music he has heard and right stuff up on all three.  He is more curious about it, so I've been looking in the used sections.  I don't know crap about bass guitars and what to look for, beside peevey and fender...

Fender/Squier Jazz bass or Ibanez SR/GSR-series.  Both have nice thin necks and are super easy to play.  If we're talking about a very young son, the GSRM-20 is a short scale (28.6").

On a related note, I've finally found a fairly regular group of guys to jam with and it's done worlds for my playing.   :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Jimbo on November 30, 2008, 06:10:38 PM
Hey my musical inclined son is wanting to try the bass.  He plays alto sax, is doing great in the jazz band @ school, plus is in another sax band from his private teacher, and can figure out a lot of things by ear.  He will take his keyboard, my old guitar, and his sax and figure out stuff from youtube or other music he has heard and right stuff up on all three.  He is more curious about it, so I've been looking in the used sections.  I don't know crap about bass guitars and what to look for, beside peevey and fender...

Fender/Squier Jazz bass or Ibanez SR/GSR-series.  Both have nice thin necks and are super easy to play.  If we're talking about a very young son, the GSRM-20 is a short scale (28.6").

On a related note, I've finally found a fairly regular group of guys to jam with and it's done worlds for my playing.   :drill:

Thanks, but my "little guy" is now 5' 9" & 150lbs, so he is into the adult sized stuff (and he isn't even 13 yet...dang it need to buy a chicken ranch to feed him).  I forgot about Ibanez, are the hopes of getting a L-head Steinberger are pretty slim.  Wow! Ned Steinberger is making some radical electric traditional insturments!  How are the Gibson Steinberger L-head basses now?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on November 30, 2008, 08:19:39 PM
Well shit.  I already gave away my starter bass (a GSR-200) to a friend that expressed interest in learning to play.

I'd really recommend the Iby GSR-200, if only because it's fairly cheap and a nice-playing instrument that really just needs better electronics (thought it's totally serviceable out of the box).  They're an even better bargain used if you can find them in good condition - the thin neck and narrow string spacing made things a bit easier for me at the outset. 

One thing that buying cheap helped me with is a complete lack of fear when it comes to learning how to set up/maintain and repair or modify these things.  Fucking around with the truss rod and other setup shit, fretless conversions, tearing the guts out/installing new pickups/alternate switching configs and the like are much less intimidating on a cheap CNC-built instrument than a $2K Gibby. 

I know that guitar snobs swear by their MIA Fenders and high-end Gibsons but I love cheap, good-playing gear that I can monkey around with without feeling guilty or like I'm destroying something.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ashrik on December 01, 2008, 04:49:13 AM
Oh awesome, I was going to start a Guitar thread to ask some questions but it seems I was beaten to the punch 33 pages ago.

I want to try and learn the Bass guitar. This is all from scratch with no experience on bass, and next to none on a regular. I saw an advertisement for an acoustic electric bass guitar which immediately piqued my interest as I don't have an amp or any other equipment and don't want to sink too much money into it before I know more.

Are acoustic/electric guitars generally worth the purchase? I only want to spend 100-200 on it since it's just a starter. Does anyone have any experience with them in this price range- or maybe even a suggestion on a particularly good model to get?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Grimwell on December 01, 2008, 02:55:11 PM
There is nothing wrong with going acoustic to learn in theory, but in practice they have limitations. Like you can't plug them into a pedal or two to tinker with the sound, unless you mic it up. I'd love me a nice acoustic bass someday, but I'm buying a pink $200 guitar linked above in a month or so and have no budget for myself quite yet.

My most recent accomplishment was buying a guitar stand. I lost the last one in a move a few years ago. Go me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 01, 2008, 03:06:21 PM
I've always been meaning to get an acoustic bass guitar, but never have. Great sound -- but oddly, I've never heard anyone capture it as badass as that dude from the Violent Femmes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 01, 2008, 03:13:28 PM
Been playing bass for 30 years and I don't see a reason to own one beyond playing on MTV unplugged.  Since we all know that MTV no longer plays music, there no longer exists a reason. 

Buy an electric bass (Ibanez, Fender Precision, Schecter, or Yamaha are decent for the cash).  With new strings you'll have plenty of resonance.  If you want more volume, this is a great time of year to buy a REALLY cheap used amp at the local pawn shop. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 01, 2008, 03:17:53 PM
Been playing bass for 30 years and I don't see a reason to own one beyond playing on MTV unplugged.  Since we all know that MTV no longer plays music, there no longer exists a reason. 

That's what I was kinda trying to say. A lot of bands are just using it in a way that doesn't differentiate from an electric.

Like I said though, the Femmes guy was different (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F17OpDLjRg).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 02, 2008, 06:24:21 AM
After all the years I've been talking about playing out, I figured it might garner at least one comment when I actually did.  :why_so_serious:

Acoustic bass...don't bother. Almost a novelty item (unless you mean a double bass, which is a whole 'nother thing and splendid). I've played a couple but have had no urge to own one in over twenty years of playing. Get an electric and practice amp.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 02, 2008, 07:13:09 AM
After all the years I've been talking about playing out, I figured it might garner at least one comment when I actually did.  :why_so_serious:

I'm sorry.  I meant to comment, but the acoustic bass stuff distracted me.

I'm glad to hear that you're getting out there and have to confess that I'm jealous.  I really wish that I could find work as a 40-something bass player, but fear that I'm relegated to wedding bands at this point.  You'll have to update us on the progress of next week.  I want to know what was being played and what you think of the younger musicians these days.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ashrik on December 02, 2008, 08:52:06 AM
Quote
acoustic bass stuff
So by what everyone has said about the acoustic bass (MTV unplugged, etc), I'll guess the same applies to an acoustic-electric bass as well?

I was looking at something along the lines of this fairly cheap Dean bass (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Dean-EAB-Acoustic-Electric-Bass-519943-i1150843.gc) I guess. It wouldn't give me the best of both worlds, by being to play effectively with or without an amp? I'm new to this whole thing and just want to make sure I don't mess up before I even begin.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ashrik on December 02, 2008, 09:01:11 AM
Oh, and big big congratulations Sky. Didn't mean to steal your thunder with my noobishness


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 02, 2008, 09:31:29 AM
I was looking at something along the lines of this fairly cheap Dean bass (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Dean-EAB-Acoustic-Electric-Bass-519943-i1150843.gc) I guess. It wouldn't give me the best of both worlds, by being to play effectively with or without an amp? I'm new to this whole thing and just want to make sure I don't mess up before I even begin.

You'll never use it beyond practice.  If that's ok and you're excited to play it, I'd say go for it.  It's going to be harder to play and less versatile than an electric bass, so know that going in. 

I bought one of these (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Ibanez-Artcore-AFB200-Hollowbody-Electric-Bass-Guitar-511838-i1172977.gc) on eBay for $150.  It's fun to play, but I'm going to get rid of it.  The neck is too wide for my tastes and I find that it's not giving me the hollow body tones I was really wanting. 

I would recommend either a Fender Jazz (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Squier-by-Fender-Standard-Jazz-Bass-102581394-i1146516.gc), Fender Precision (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Squier-by-Fender-Standard-P-Bass-Special-Edition-519630-i1150675.gc), an Ibanez (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Ibanez-SR300DX-Soundgear-Bass-Guitar-102661881-i1150627.gc), or a Yamaha (http://www.guitarcenter.com/Yamaha-RBX374-Electric-Bass-Guitar-519038-i1150344.gc).  When you get more cash, you should be able to buy a cheap practice amp for next to nothing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 02, 2008, 09:45:43 AM
Talk to the folks at your local guitar stores, they usually run starter bundles for cheap. I'd rather have a cheap electric + amp than a decent acoustic/electric.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 02, 2008, 09:48:53 AM
Talk to the folks at your local guitar stores, they usually run starter bundles for cheap. I'd rather have a cheap electric + amp than a decent acoustic/electric.

Sage advice. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Grimwell on December 02, 2008, 12:47:55 PM
I always knew you were good Sky, so I didn't even think to comment. It sounded fun, but I was like "Well yeah, of course he did well." :)

Quote from: Nebu
I really wish that I could find work as a 40-something bass player, but fear that I'm relegated to wedding bands at this point.
No, you will never be famous, but that is really about as honest and true as it was when you were a 20-something bass player. Very few people get famous for this after all.

Steal the idea I have yet to have time for: Make a Guitar Hero, Rock Band tribute cover act. Everyone will know your songs, most of them are fun to play, and with the Rock Band stuff if your vocalist is out at least one person in the crowd will give it a try. :)

Those are solid set lists for playing local bars and just having fun after all.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 02, 2008, 12:58:54 PM
No, you will never be famous, but that is really about as honest and true as it was when you were a 20-something bass player. Very few people get famous for this after all.

I was signed as both a songwriter and a musician when I was in my 20's. Between management decisions (image over substance, etc.) and a heroin addicted lead singer, I became disillusioned by the music industry within the first year. My goal was never to get famous.  It was to make a solid living in the music industry... which is nearly as tough as becoming famous.  I'm sure Sky can tell you guys as many stories as I can about playing decent sized venues and not making enough to pay for gear, techs, and sound/light guys.  Hell, I have as many stories about getting stiffed. 

Music is a young kid's game.  Image and show are king, at least in the mainstream.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Grimwell on December 02, 2008, 01:02:31 PM
Ok, you are the exception and not the rule then. Even without going the distance. I made it as far as local radio and then sold all my gear and moved to LA metro and have never been in a band again since.

One exception to the young mans game is to go off of mainstream. Country, folk, bluegrass, jazz and more all welcome anyone with talent. Age is not a gate. Oh sure, it is an asset to be young and good looking, but talent is talent in some areas.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 02, 2008, 01:49:15 PM
One exception to the young mans game is to go off of mainstream. Country, folk, bluegrass, jazz and more all welcome anyone with talent. Age is not a gate. Oh sure, it is an asset to be young and good looking, but talent is talent in some areas.

Very true.  I've always loved bluegrass and there is a plethora of talented players. I think my problem has always been that I don't have the raw talent to make it as a player.  Sky, Stray, and Raph have me beat there. 

I did have a stint playing upright bass for a swing jazz band, but my music theory was a tad weak and it really showed in the music of that era.  Time to go back into the garage and brush up!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 02, 2008, 01:59:17 PM
As much as I like this form of "entertainment", I really don't like entertaining anybody.. Therefore I'm not famous. I have no discipline for that. It really just is for myself, and my own therapy. And I have a problem sticking with routines. I could never do acting either.. which is worse. Day in day out doing the same play. Meh


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 02, 2008, 02:05:49 PM
I could never do acting either.. which is worse. Day in day out doing the same play. Meh

It cracks me up how all the actors and actresses all act like an authority on things.  I can't imagine pretending to be someone of substance rather than, you know, actually doing something.  Don't get me wrong, I appreciate and value the Arts.  I just wish 'TEH TALENT' would take a good look at what it is they do. They pretend and get paid (sometimes silly amounts) to do it. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 02, 2008, 02:14:12 PM
I need to add to "therefore I'm not famous" -- I mean, therefore I didn't even choose a path that would lead to fame.

That was probably obvious though.


As for acting.. I did dabble with acting a bit, and still would for fun maybe.. My only two cents towards that is that being an actor is bit like being a librarian (which is my new career path btw hah). I mean, at least any actor worth their salt wants to research and put some effort into what it's like to be this or that person.. It was my favorite part of it actually.. the research and rehearsing parts. Besides research, you're also an observer, and a bit of psychology student.. You fill in the gaps of what you can't know about some person's place and time with universal psychological themes.

You're right though, some actors get a little arrogant like that... I don't think the profession encourages it though. My teachers always addressed the fact that you simply can't know anyone ultimately.. So just do as much research as possible. I'm just not interested enough in the whole thing to be an ambitious workhorse about it. Just as hard as touring in a band probably (just referring to stage acting btw).

Anyways.. Sorry for the derail  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 03, 2008, 06:31:02 AM
a librarian (which is my new career path btw hah)
Woohoo! Good luck finding a job, heh. Try to line something up while you're in graduate school. It's a great field (my fiancee being a librarian and I've worked among them for 8 years, if it weren't for the MLS req, I'd go for it, too). Problem is, most librarians settle down and work in the same position to retirement, so finding openings can be tough. And the political and financial environment is a bit rough on libraries.

Anyway, back to the thread. The whole concept of "making it" is a young man's game. Pop forms are mostly for the kids, too, stuff like hip hop, rap and metal. That's why I love the blues, you get better every year until you die or have a stroke. If you go blind, you just get a cooler nickname.

Nebu: I don't have talent, imo. What I have is tenacity. Well, maybe a little raw talent, but talent doesn't mean shit. The only (ONLY) way to be good is to practice. A lot. You should be practicing right now. Practice while watching tv. Practice on lunch. And practice well, develop a routine and schedule. (Note: don't do as I do, do as I say! :P) Keep yourself on your toes, work on scales, theory, fretmapping, repertoire, improv, inversions, etc. I know you guys know this stuff, but I always scoff when people think I'm talented. It's 24 years, on and off, of lots of practice and experience. Always learn and strive to improve...and you will.

Some more sage advice for any young musicians, since we're doing career retrospective stuff: don't go to LA. Stay in your pond and become the big fish, the labels will find you. Fuck, you don't want a major, anyway, you just want their distro and ad channels. The most important thing is getting savvy management and a good smaller label, then let them negotiate stuff. And stay sober and keep tabs on the business end. Like Nebu, I never wanted to be famous, just make a living touring and making albums. Maybe get a couple things used in movies or jingles to get some royalties when I got old. As far as getting stiffed, I'll update my sig with one of my favorite HST quotes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 03, 2008, 06:44:09 AM
Nebu: I don't have talent, imo. What I have is tenacity. Well, maybe a little raw talent, but talent doesn't mean shit. The only (ONLY) way to be good is to practice. A lot. You should be practicing right now. Practice while watching tv. Practice on lunch. And practice well, develop a routine and schedule. (Note: don't do as I do, do as I say! :P) Keep yourself on your toes, work on scales, theory, fretmapping, repertoire, improv, inversions, etc. I know you guys know this stuff, but I always scoff when people think I'm talented. It's 24 years, on and off, of lots of practice and experience. Always learn and strive to improve...and you will.

Humility too.  I've listened to your playing... you do have talent.  There are musicians and there are people that play instruments.  You definately have that "thing" that makes you a musician.  I play about an hour a day, but it's just not enough to stay as sharp as I was when I was actively playing.  One resource that I absolutely LOVE is youtube.  Laugh if you want, but I've learned a ton of great new techniques and scale patterns from watching some instructional stuff on youtube.  Sure, 99% of it is crap... there are a few gems among the rubble.

Some more sage advice for any young musicians, since we're doing career retrospective stuff: don't go to LA. Stay in your pond and become the big fish, the labels will find you. Fuck, you don't want a major, anyway, you just want their distro and ad channels. The most important thing is getting savvy management and a good smaller label, then let them negotiate stuff. And stay sober and keep tabs on the business end. Like Nebu, I never wanted to be famous, just make a living touring and making albums. Maybe get a couple things used in movies or jingles to get some royalties when I got old. As far as getting stiffed, I'll update my sig with one of my favorite HST quotes.

Great advice.  LA is what killed the music business for me.  Granted it was LA in the mid-80's.  I wish I had kept my hand in writing and composing more.  I wasn't particularly good, but my timing was wonderful.  Playing in the music scene in Minneapolis during the Prince/Time/Husker Du/Loud Fast Rules era brought a lot of attention to the area. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 03, 2008, 07:00:41 AM
I'll agree on the tenacity and practice thing.

I think my biggest learning moments come from just learning a run from someone... and then playing it 3 or 4 notes down or up.. then mixing it up.. reversing it.. something..bringing new bends and vibrato here and there.. just exploring that territory. It is literally exploring a territory to me.. and I play in that sandbox for weeks.

I know when I'm dry and stagnating and not truly learning if I'm not introducing new elements to the original...if I'm just repeating the original thing over and over again, like some mindless activity. It's easy to get trapped in that too. And I don't think I'm understanding anything about the theory or mechanics behind it if I don't dig through the possibilities and participate.. throwing my own ideas in it and seeing what works or not.

I'm no good at memorizing scales per se, but I guess I start gathering theory through riffs and patterns like that. Maybe I'm doing it the hard way, I don't know.. Maybe if I knew all of the technical stuff beforehand, I'd recognize things easier, and wouldn't need to explore in this way.

Anyways, I ran into a couple of painters who also jam out.. a wife and husband. They want to make a band. Maybe I will.. We've all got this thing to want to make a sort of tongue in cheek gothy punk band. Would be nice. Just playing with people is always good for me too.

[edit] slimmed down, and grammar


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 03, 2008, 07:17:56 AM
Oh yeah (sorry to get carried away here), I think just wanting to learn is about courage too.. When I first told myself "Learn Johnny B Goode" that shit was daunting.  :uhrr: But I tried. Right now, and Sky will appreciate this, I'm telling myself.. "Learn more Setzer". Just touching a tiny bit of his "territory" is doing wonders with my understanding of jazzy type of leads. Oddly enough, not so much Rockabilly (I think I need to go to Chet Atkins and Scotty Moore for the real country tinged Rockabilly shit). Setzer is rockabilly, but playing him, and getting more close, I see how jazzy it is.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 03, 2008, 08:31:51 AM
One resource that I absolutely LOVE is youtube.  Laugh if you want, but I've learned a ton of great new techniques and scale patterns from watching some instructional stuff on youtube.  Sure, 99% of it is crap... there are a few gems among the rubble.
First off, thanks for your compliment. Always feels good. I know I've come a long way, but I see my goal and I'm so far from it that some days it seems impossible. Stuff like getting out at the open mic and getting that immediate feedback is so long overdue. But I wanted to wait long enough to make a good first impression. Rather than see me get on stage and groan, I want people to see me walk in the door and come over and ask if I'll be playing. Mission accomplished, now the work starts: building a reputation as a solid improviser and featured player, so I can just kind of be free to sit in with bands and recordings over the next few decades.

Youtube, it's great. Not just to trade chops, though I did just get a compliment about that old anesthesia piece I tossed up a while back for you guys. But for lessons, and as I learned last night while thinking about overdrive pedals, it's great for product demos. Search for the pedal you're thinking about and you'll find someone demoing it, and some of the demos are really good (like using a strat and then a les paul). I'm really leaning toward the Fulltone Fulldrive 2 MOSFET, it just seems real nice and transparent. The TS808 seems a little too present, especially for my amp, and I thought the Sparkle Drive sounded like a blanket. I've never had a good ear for effects, I always have made the best of what I've had on hand, so it's nice to develop it. I shouldn't have listened to the Fulltone TTE tape effect unit, it's  :drill: and $1080  :ye_gods: .

LA. Early 90s. Went from being the top of the local underground circuit, kings of our domain, to nobodies in a glam metal hell. SF was slightly better, but by then we had lost our drummer and our guitarist was done but we couldn't see it at the time. I'm glad for the life experiences, but it killed my music career. And then the fact that I played with such a talented band that wrote copious amounts of good original material across multiple genres...when I came home and tried to rebuild, well, most local guys just aren't all that good. That's why I put the bass down for a few years, just had to re-evaluate why I was playing.

Setzer is phenomenal. If I could Rogue anyone's talent away, it'd be him. I saw him a while ago, and I was speechless. He did rock, rockabilly, swing jazz, gypsy jazz, christmas tunes, and blues. Probably something else I'm forgetting. Part of why I was looking at that TTE unit is that he uses one and tube and tape  sound amazing, unlike most echo units. But his style is so far from mine, all I can do is grab a few bits and feels and throw them in and try to climb that mountain. I've got Stray Cat Strut in my practice rotation right now, one nice thing is that he's recorded it so many times you can see how he plays with the core ideas. I learn more from that than from the actual song.

Same thing goes with country blues. I'd really just like to be a country delta acoustic guy, hammering out old tunes and hollering along. But I've got what I've got so that's what I work with, just incorporate some of the acoustic style chordings and runs. Guy at the jam thought I was kidding when I said I don't practice speed. Coming from the thrash metal background, speed is pretty much there to be tapped. Like riding a bike, you need to practice it, but the tough part is knowing how to do it. My downpicking is so rusty, you don't want to hear my Master of Puppets, which we used to play almost double speed back in the day.

Stray, the stuff you're talking about is where I find the fun. In learning new stuff and then stretching it out and playing around with it. Good dual guitar bands, like the Allmans, will work a lick back and forth between each other, morphing and changing it, challenging themselves and the other guitarist. That's really what I'd like to be doing right now, which is why I'm focusing the "work" part of my practice on fretboard knowledge, inversions, patterns and all that. The CAGED system is really making that stuff a lot easier. Funny you mention rockabilly, the song I just threw on my new "to learn" list is Keep a Knockin', Chuck Berry was the man. One of the first solos I learned was from Johnny B Goode, to use in a production of Grease I was in (as the house band, not an actor).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 03, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Slim down shmim down  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2008, 01:36:34 AM
Setzer is phenomenal. If I could Rogue anyone's talent away, it'd be him. I saw him a while ago, and I was speechless. He did rock, rockabilly, swing jazz, gypsy jazz, christmas tunes, and blues. Probably something else I'm forgetting. Part of why I was looking at that TTE unit is that he uses one and tube and tape  sound amazing, unlike most echo units. But his style is so far from mine, all I can do is grab a few bits and feels and throw them in and try to climb that mountain. I've got Stray Cat Strut in my practice rotation right now, one nice thing is that he's recorded it so many times you can see how he plays with the core ideas. I learn more from that than from the actual song.

Yeah, Strut's something I have in mind. I just like going through the lead in different keys, and switching things around a bit. Really jazzy tune..

To me though, the epitomy of rockabilly is Scotty Moore.. simplistic, fingerpicking stuff..

Baby Lets Play House (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX-4__DdhzA)

Or that face smackin' lead in Hound Dog (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We8P_Ww27hY)

Those two are like "gateways" to me, if you will. What rockabilly rhythm is. What rockabilly lead is. :awesome_for_real:

I know that Setzer can easily play in that territory though. He can do almost anything.  :awesome_for_real: I like that he gives his nod to Scotty in this Mystery Train (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggN-HKq3FG8) cover, but you can hear the difference in style (ignore the fact that Setzer just flat out wails harder). He blew past Scotty long ago - but you know he sat around in his domain once... Now he incorporates all kinds of shit.. Especially those Django-ish type of runs. Which is cool. Fucking awesome really. I guess what I mean though is that I don't think I'll really understand rockabilly by jumping ahead into Setzer. Gotta start with Scotty's basics (which is already hard as it is! I used to think Chuck was the ace guitarist of the 50's, but now it's Scotty.. or at least, his rhythms are a lot harder for me to learn).

[edit] added some shit


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2008, 02:47:16 AM
Ah yes, youtube is great, isn't it?

Here's a guy singling it all out on Baby Lets Play House.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQ2fK7cuG6Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQ2fK7cuG6Q)

It's just simple killer rhythm.. If can I do that, then I'll be  :awesome_for_real:


So yeah, I need to get with it. It's fairly easy.. I've just always sucked at fingerpicking. A little sketchy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 04, 2008, 07:18:33 AM
Sounds kinda like you approach rockabilly the way I approach blues. SRV was cool, but I'd rather go to his source and find my own voice. There's something of a purity in that approach, I think.

Hound Dog is actually on my practice rotation right now, off Jr Well's amazing first album (which is definitely a desert island pick for me). Check out the sample on amazon (http://www.amazon.com/Hoodoo-Man-Blues-Junior-Wells/dp/B000004BI9/). I play it more aggressively than Buddy Guy does on that track, and also I end up mixing in a lot of Chitlin Con Carne in there, too. It's my favorite practice album because it's a good mix of single-note lines and chording, it's really straight forward, and Buddy Guy is about as restrained as he gets playing behind Junior. I usually run through this entire album when I practice.

That last video kinda reminds me of part of my style, I try to do chords in my solos and also add in a lot of single-note bass lines, I just hear them, having been a bassist for so long. One thing I'm still pinning down is those little chord fills that is really the cornerstone of that style. That's why I'm so hot on the CAGED stuff and the MI books in particular, because all that stuff becomes almost easy when you can see the whole fretmap for the different positions. I've been lax the last few weeks, focusing on repertoire and hardly practicing at all this week.

That fulltone OD pedal (the fulldrive 2) has been in my amazon shopping cart for a week now :) Here's a link (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fulltone+fulldrive+2&search_type=&aq=1&oq=fulltone+) to the product demos I alluded to in my big post up there. Since I have an SG, I mostly going by the first part of the Pro Guitar Shop demo. They have an impressive collection of demos, and it's the same guy doing it with the same amp (and two guitars for some of them). Really opened my ears, along with the harmony central reviews.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2008, 02:38:34 PM
I have some good pedals.. Used to have more. So far, I don't need an overdrive so much as a good Fuzz (want a Z Vox).


---

Lmao, I wasn't kidding about the "bravery" thing. I was recording this, and couldn't bring myself to improvise yet. Heh. I really don't feel comfortable with it enough yet.. like I said, still sketchy.

Baby Lets Play House (http://sites.google.com/site/straykat101/music/baby_lets_play_house_01.mp3?attredirects=0)


[edit] Fuckin' A.. I kept looking at that guy's youtube vid for pointers, but just listened to Scotty's again. There's just way more going on there. I feel bad for posting that now. :\


Tell me if that file is working though. I just moved it to Google Sites.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2008, 05:16:14 PM
Huh. This is pretty dope. I'm sure you've seen it, but those bass lines are cool (not in the original).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdkTRMU_vpc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdkTRMU_vpc)

If I didn't have a clanky Fender, I'd throw a clip in.. But it's in drop D with an octave.. Sounds pretty messy.

I need to make up my own lead to this, because I'm not playing that way anytime soon.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on December 04, 2008, 08:17:41 PM
Funny.  My parents told me guitar was a waste of time and that I'd never be famous, so why bother trying to learn?  Since I never gave a shit about being famous or even making money off of it, that was all the more incentive for me to learn to play.  I enjoy playing in my room by myself almost more than playing with other musicians, because quite honestly I'm my own worst critic, but I'm not a douchebag to myself about it like other people are.  I am honest about messing up or playing sloppy, but I don't do it just to make myself feel bad.

Regarding big fish in little ponds, that is true to an extent.  But unless you want to play Texas Country, staying in W. Texas and playing the bar circuit is just not a lot of fun or rewarding.  There have to at least be fans out there that even remotely want to hear you do something besides cover their favorite Alan Jackson or Garth Brooks song.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2008, 06:58:18 AM
Huh. This is pretty dope. I'm sure you've seen it, but those bass lines are cool (not in the original).
I've got the DVD :) Some nice chops on your clip, too!
My parents told me guitar was a waste of time and that I'd never be famous, so why bother trying to learn?
Talk about missing the point. The ability to play a musical instrument can stimulate creativity and problem solving, helps coordination, reduces stress. While I certainly went through a "making it" phase, it was over by the time I was 23 and I've had many years of enjoyment out of playing guitar for myself and others. I mostly do it for myself though, I just enjoy making music and the physical act of being able to play, and it's such a contructive hobby (unlike passive stuff like tv or gaming), the more I play the better I get, the better I get, the more I enjoy playing.

But eh, as Will "Fresh Prince" Smith said, parents just don't understand. My parents never went to any of my band's performances. Mostly because we were underground, but they never showed an interest in seeing me play with my band, who they disliked. Supportive, but not very interested, I guess.

Re: big fish in small ponds, we almost never played bars or clubs. Pure underground and we'd get many more fans that way. We had a ridiculous following, it was pretty cool. I've got nothing against straight cover bands, they fill a niche and beat a jukebox if they're decent. Just not what I'm into, even though I mostly play "cover" material now, it's a whole different thing with the blues, and the sheer level of improvisation involved is cool. If there's only an audience for Garth covers at the bars, think of how many people are sitting around unhappy with their bar scene and looking for an alternative. Seek opportunities :) More easterly, but Pantera was from Texas, and they sure put out a ton of blues players down there, too.

edit: Pulled the trigger on the Fulltone. Fuck it, if I've been looking at something that long and I'm still interested, might as well get it. Had to order the power supply separate, though. Probably going to order another power supply (at $20/ea), because the pedal is built to be over-volted. Easier with a power system like the voodoo pedal power, but you can also rewire two power supplies for the 18v dc.

Just trying to build a simple tone that I can add to later for more specialized stuff. And I don't want to be stuck lugging the Boss GT-6 everywhere, that thing is a pain in the ass and I never did learn how to program it :) The FD-2 will be my first pedal in...I'd have to say over twenty years. My last pedal was probably a proco rat, those things were sick metal tone in front of a Laney full stack. Had a couple cheap flange, verb type pedals and the world's crappiest wah. Then I got into rack effects for a bit with some ART stuff and then some mid-70s units including a great echo machine. Bass I played straight into my amp, though I did keep the rat and wah for playing anesthesia.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 05, 2008, 02:23:10 PM
Thanks Sky. I have a better version already.. Better than Youtube guy's.  :grin: Scotty's version is in constant motion, that dude has some stops.. I tried recording a newer one last night, but got tired. Maybe later. I still don't know how to move in it well though. Keep trying to improve on Scotty's basic solo, but whatever I keep playing doesn't quite fit his rockabilly rhythm well. Keeps coming out all jazzy and shit (and not in a cool Setzer way  :-P).

I'm finding that Rock this Town is even more fun to play now than any of these. I love tunes that just stand on their own like that, just on guitar and vox. That can be very complex, but still doable by one's self - not so complex that you can't sing along. I need to build a repertoire or something of covers like that. For picnics or some shit. Heh


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 05, 2008, 02:36:52 PM
Speaking of which, did I ever mention Scott H Biram? He's one of my brother's best friends. I remember meeting this dude like 10 years ago in "humble beginnings"... But now a lot of people are crowning him the king of austin alt country  :-o

Anyways, he's one of these dudes that I can just really entertain you all by himself. I've never good at that. Not that his songs are complex, but he's just damn good and right up your alley.

Spoonful (http://ninebullets.s3.amazonaws.com/Scott_H_Biram_-_spoonful.mp3)

Whiskey (http://ninebullets.s3.amazonaws.com/Scott_H_Biram_-_Whiskey.mp3)


(http://www.bloodshotrecords.com/files/imagecache/double-col-header/files/artist-headers/artist_main_scottbiram.jpg)

"He has a true stage presence that could be fairly compared to that of Clint Eastwood on film. The dude's more dude than most other dudes you will ever meet." —Austinist

Rock 'n' Roll ain't pretty and neither is Scott H. Biram. The self proclaimed "Dirty Old One Man Band" successfully, and sometimes violently, lashes together blues, hillbilly and country precariously to raucous punk and godless metal.


Heh


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 06, 2008, 02:43:06 PM
Wow, he's down and dirty. :)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 08, 2008, 09:30:09 AM
Yeah, that's cool stuff. My kind of 'production', no doubts! Spoonful is a great tune, my favorite version is Charley Patton's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxHn8WIgGbQ He doesn't sing the spoonful part, he uses the slide to say 'spoonful'. It's sitting in my pile of 'to learn' tunes. I'm a lazy fuck.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 11, 2008, 01:46:26 PM
Got the Fulldrive 2 MOSFET in yesterday. Going to have to practice with it a while to get used to the different tones, but WOW. I'm going to have to struggle against GAS now, this pedal sounds amazing. Gives my upper-register notes the singing quality the amp itself can't quite provide at the sound levels I practice at, or really what levels I could use at the bar given the one show I played, though we got a lot louder as the night went on, dueling lead syndrome :)

But I normally play with headphones on, not noise cancelling, but decent isolation sennheisers. So playing without them to dial in tone has left my ears ringing like a mofo (ringing right now, about 18 hours later!). But I've dialed in a decent vintage tone, in my case I refer to something like Buddy Guy on Jr Well's debut, if he was playing an SG instead of a strat :), and hit the boost channel (gain boost, not volume, very nice) for leads and upper register playing.

Still a little...dunno how to articulate it...a little noise when I play an open E power chord (EBE) or even a 7th-fret E7 with the low E open (EEG#D). Trying to dial it out, because it's the only flaw I can find right now for a solid basic tone. And it's really minor, I have to listen for it but now it drives me nuts.

One of my volume knobs broke off the SG :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 12, 2008, 07:56:51 AM
I'm OCD and like a lot of tones (modeling gear is a godsend), but I always gravitate towards a certain sound that's real mid-heavy and crunchy, not distorted..I think I've said before how much I liked Rory Gallagher's tone. Vox and Strat. You can cut through anything with that. I really don't know what to do with a lot of distortion, or a lot of treb, or a lot of bass.

This is an odd one, but I've always liked John Christ/Danzig's old sound too (got more metal later on). It's basically a mid heavy crunch too... just harder. That guy is a fucking mean guitar player, underrated, and sounds cooler than everybody in metal.

Not of this World (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oNnttFmzuQ)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 15, 2008, 04:00:09 AM
I learned Rock this Town, but I keep digging those basslines he does.. I want to do a cool song with something like that.

Had this thing I was just noodling with:

Riff (http://sites.google.com/site/straykat101/music/psychobilly_riff.mp3?attredirects=0) (sorry for the bad quality.. just fucking around as usual)

Sounds more like psychobilly than rockabilly.. That bass part could sound better if I had my amp set to make it slap, I guess. Not sure what kind of leads to play with though other than some DK/East Bay Ray surf thing (note, I wasn't trying to do much here). Not sure if that's the difference between psycho and rockabilly...? Rockabilly seems more bluesy and jazzy. Psycho sounds like there are more surfy possibilities. Or so I think.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 15, 2008, 06:15:33 AM
OK, don't listen to that one.  :oh_i_see:


I made a few more rhythm parts that were jazzier.. and incorporated that riff above into a bridge and half-assed solo.  :oh_i_see:

Slightly better. Not sure if it's rockabilly or psychobilly like now though. Hopefully it makes some sense.


Second version (http://sites.google.com/site/straykat101/music/Psychobilly_2.mp3?attredirects=0)


Also, my finger feels funny and the pick keeps slipping. Excuses, excuses..

[edit] Heh, god that's a bad solo.

Anyways, after a second listen, I'm realizing that there's too much of a minor key sound to it for it be rockabilly like. Not sure wtf that is. Has some kind of potential though. :awesome_for_real:

[edit] By the way, this would be the vocal melody, I guess (kind of just trying to do it on guitar.. humming a little.. I can't sing).

link (http://sites.google.com/site/straykat101/music/Psychobilly_2_melody.mp3?attredirects=0)

Anyhoo.. Just writing a song, I guess. Felt like sharing. Feel free to help if you like it. :P It usually starts off like this, if I hear a cool idea (like Setzers little bass walk in Rock this Town), and then I do my own thing.  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 15, 2008, 06:59:07 AM
Not too minor key at all, that was cool. The middle part had a very nice melody going that you could expand on as the main theme (around 2:30 iirc). I don't know what's not to like about it, I thought it sounded great. Don't be so rough on yourself, that's my gig.  :awesome_for_real:

I started messing around some more, since I probably won't be playing out until after the holidays. Got down the lead section of Peter Gunn because my fiancee was asking about it, some dumb commercial is always on using the theme. I've known the rhythm forever, might as well finish it off. Then I got to playing some Hendrix, fleshed out some of Wind Cries Mary, which I've been meaning to learn since I first started playing guitar, I've known the intro and verse for over twenty years :P Need to clean up the solo and play it more so I remember it. Wrote it and Hey Joe out in my cheat sheet format (lyrics, chords and a few licks I don't remember, my memory sucks). Also started working on Stray Cat Strut again, I always forget the first solo section.

Also working the xmas tunes for the family stuff. I wish I had started earlier, Jingle Bell Rock would've been cool for an open mic. Ah, well. There's always next year. Well, until you die. That's why we should all practice more!  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 15, 2008, 07:50:27 AM
Jingle Bell Rock would be neat.

Thanks for the input.


The problem with rockabilly is it's so damn flashy. And I'm not.  :uhrr: Man, that takes a lot of knowledge and dexterity.

I slowed down the pace here.. This is just a redone intro with better fill-ins. But for me, it'd be hard to keep up like that, simple as it sounds.

Last clip before I hit the road.

Intro (http://sites.google.com/site/straykat101/music/Psychobilly_intro.mp3?attredirects=0)




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 16, 2008, 08:21:44 PM
I didn't see this come up before on a quick forum search (and being too lazy to search 34 pages of posts):

Can anyone recommend a decent acoustic guitar?

I used to own a real cheap one (I think it was a Bentley?? or something similar), that never stayed in tune, would change action after every string replacement, and buzzed like mad around the 9th or 10th fret on the D and G strings.  I'm guessing that the fretboard was never really true.  It really soured me against acoustic guitars in general.

So I'm done with the ultra cheap pieces of crap.  I'm not even sure what features I should be looking for, but so far I have found:

1) Solid top (as opposed to laminated plywood)? Spruce? Mahogany? Cedar?
2) Mahogany sides? Back?
3) Rosewood fretboard?
4) Dreadnaught? (cut-away to reach the higher frets?)
5) Ebony headstock?

I don't really care about on-board electronics, but if it has them I don't mind.

Can anyone recommend some manufacturers / models that fit the above, or recommend an alternative?

I would be looking at about the $500 price range.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 17, 2008, 06:44:55 AM
Taaaaaylor! I love Taylors, though I only have the Baby ($250). It's more of a travel guitar, I guess, but I love the tone more than my $400 alvarez. The Alv is engelman spruce top with maple body, looks great but the projection is only decent. The all-mahogany Baby, otoh, projects like a mofo, has much richer overtones and just a nice full sound. Alv has a rosewood neck, Baby is ebony. I do like the Alv's cutaway, I can access alot more of the neck, so it's more useful overall. But no contest if I had to choose one, I'd take the Taylor in a second.

Raph is really the guy to ask, he's the most acoustic-oriented and experienced.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 17, 2008, 06:53:20 AM
I suggest a Seagull. They're quality and sub-$1000. The cool thing about them too is that their nuts/necks are a little wide at 1.8". Good for fingerpicking. Guitar Center has them.. go play one. They sound very nice. You'll see what I mean.

Besides the Baby, Taylors are a bit pricey.

[edit] I don't have one btw, but plan on it. I have a Takamine which is OK, I guess.. and a classical. I want both in one. I can't fingerpick as easily on a standard steel string. The Seagulls meet that need, and sound and feel great, especially for the price.

Some nice clips.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztXbsgOlTGs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztXbsgOlTGs)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amqCEZkCbpI&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amqCEZkCbpI&feature=related)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 17, 2008, 02:26:27 PM
Quote
The cool thing about them too is that their nuts/necks are a little wide at 1.8".

This is actually a good point.  I have massive hands, and a wider neck would be a welcome feature.

Does anyone make a neck wider than 1.8"


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 17, 2008, 02:32:39 PM
Not sure. Any twelve string would be as wide as classical, I believe.. but it'd take some setting up.

Django/Gypsy Jazz type guitars have pretty wide necks.

But really, 1 7/8 or 1.8 is pretty wide. I have big hands too, and it isn't bothersome.

I think most manufacturers make at least one model or two with wide necks. Or some will custom do it. Seagull seems to do it as a rule, so it's an easy way to check out if that width feels good or not.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 17, 2008, 03:11:30 PM
Quote
But really, 1 7/8 or 1.8 is pretty wide. I have big hands too, and it isn't bothersome.

I'll give it a try in person, if I can stomach 15 minutes at Guitar Center these days.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 17, 2008, 03:21:14 PM
Heh. Well, the good thing about acoustic section, I guess, is that they're booths and closed off. You can sit in there for a long time without anyone noticing you.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 17, 2008, 08:18:06 PM
In that price range, Seagull, Alvarez, Yamaha, and even Washburns. There might be a Takamine in the right price range, not sure. I would stay away from the thin Fender ones, they tend to need to be plugged in to sound decent. I also dislike the tone of Ovations -- they make one sound, at various volumes, and I like a guitar capable of more than one. But don't be driven solely by brand, find the instrument that works for you. My main guitar (which plenty here have heard recordings of, and know how lovely it sounds) is a $500 Saga-imported Blueridge. It outplays just about every Taylor, Martin, and Gibson I have ever touched.

Take a player with you to help pick, if you are not experienced at it yourself; instruments can have subtle flaws. Specifically, check for even action up the neck, buzzes at various positions on the neck, intonation up the neck, and how it sounds to a listener as opposed to how it sounds to you.

If you get someone who pushes the electronics on you, insist on playing it acoustic and making the decision that way, then moving on to trying out electronics. But discard a choice based on the acoustic sound.

Try playing two or three sorts of music on it: something with some fingerpicking, something with barres up the neck, something rough sounding and something delicate -- some guitars will shine with one tonal area versus another, and getting a fingerpicking parlor guitar when you want to play punk is no good. A versatile instrument will grow better with you as a player, as you explore more tonalities.

You do want a solid top. The rest of the woods almost don't matter -- they affect the sound, not the quality of it but the timbre. So go by ear, not by looks.

For massive hands -- again, you pretty much have to try them out. Do you want to play nylon or steel? Most of my advice here is centered on steel, though a lot of it is generally applicable.

I personally like a cutaway, for what I play, but a lot depends on what you want to play. It does affect the sound slightly.

For styles -- dreadnought, jumbo, parlor, whatever, it depends on your goals as a player. In general, the bigger the guitar, the more bass and the more volume. The jumbos get bassier than the dreadnoughts. But jumbos and dreadnoughts are a pain to lug around. A small parlor guitar won't project well outdoors or in loud areas, if you plan to do that. Smaller guitars are often more expressive, but are also a bit more fragile, and if you find a really expressive big guitar it can have a bigger tonal range.

A Baby Taylor is quite nice btw. Probably too small for your hands though.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 17, 2008, 08:20:41 PM
Oh... if you find a used guitar at a pawn shop, it's worth a play and may be a steal. I learned on a pawn shop Yamaha, and it was quite decent, and I think it was $150.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 18, 2008, 10:23:21 AM
Awesome info Raph.  I think I'll take a guitar-player friend of mine who can really work out the acoustic for me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: WitchKiller on December 20, 2008, 02:53:56 PM
I see a lot of guys here talking about fame like it's impossible.  Maybe my perspective is different because I'm in Austin (we have a lot of music come through here), but I think it's just a matter of work invested, and not some magic lottery.  Anyway, that seems like a face-to-face kind of topic.

Anyone going to see Lorenzo Michelli while he's in the states?  The guitarist from By Any Means Necessary (phenomenal 21 year old guitarist) and I are headed to Nashville in February to check him out.  I only play European style metal, but I admire all virtuosos, especially string players.


Pretty good psychobilly, stray.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 20, 2008, 03:02:37 PM
Been in and out of Austin myself (in SA now). I don't think it's impossible. There's a lot of talented songwriters, I think -- more than that's represented in the general public, for sure.. But not all of them have the skill at selling and packaging things in a way for that. Music is just music to them.. an end in itself. Like what musicians were doing 500 years ago (or even 100 really). I think the ones who've gotten some wide notoriety have played the game in some way -- even when they say they don't...

J Mascis (Dino Jr.), for instance -- biggest slacker there ever was.. The Godfather of Slack.. He really doesn't give a shit -- yet, he places himself in situations, with other musicians, studios, etc. where it just fell in his lap naturally. Some people don't even do that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 20, 2008, 09:30:11 PM
I see a lot of guys here talking about fame like it's impossible. 
Nobody said impossible.

By the way, who are you?  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 20, 2008, 09:49:22 PM
I used to live in Austin. I got to hang out with folks who were somewhat well known (in Austin anyway, in the singer-songwriter area). DIana Jones, before she moved away and got critical acclaim for her Appalachian stuff. Steve Brooks and Steve Hopkins. Dana Cooper, when he was in town. Paul Sanchez. Some folks should have been better known than they were or are.

My sense is, you have to keep working and working and working at it. And I always had other things to do. *shrug*


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: WitchKiller on December 20, 2008, 10:55:29 PM
I see a lot of guys here talking about fame like it's impossible. 
Nobody said impossible.

By the way, who are you?  :why_so_serious:

Sorry Sky, I usually just lurk around here.  I'm just a dude.  I played bass in an Austin heavy metal band for a couple of years, but left after I started school full time.  Right now I just practice, and work on some instrumental stuff with pro tools.  I have an upright Stray if you want to start a Psychobilly 3-piece.  I might even have a drummer.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 21, 2008, 02:35:23 AM
No shit? I've been pissing and moaning to friends about not meeting enough people with an upright. ...and wondering to myself why I'm trying to learn these type of tunes when I've got nobody to play off. Heh. Yeah, sounds like a cool idea dude. Can you sing and play too?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 21, 2008, 03:54:53 AM
BTW, have you heard older Tiger Army (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MRPWObX48U) stuff? That's kind of what I'm shooting for (not intentionally.. though I dig the band..). Not psychobilly per se, but something in between punk, rockabilly, and psycho. I'm about as good (or bad) a guitar player as Nick..which is to say, not as good as rockabilly musicians, but know some of the trappings well enough. He sings about dark shit like psychobilly too, plays fast like them.. but delivers a little more smoothly like rockabilly.

I like the Quakes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbpQqo2jvuE) too. They don't limit themselves to anything traditionally rockabilly.. they really evolve the sound, I think.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: WitchKiller on December 22, 2008, 05:44:25 PM
Yeah Stray, I used to really love Tiger Army, but never really followed them after their 3rd album (Ghost Tigers Rise?).  Nick13 shifted too far from the 50's for my tastes.  They seem like they're still enjoying a lot of success though, so that's good. 

I can play and sing, but only back up style.  Playing anything on an acoustic 4/4 double bass is so much of a pain compared to the guitar, but I can still sing along.

I just picked up strings, but still need to see the luthier, and I really need to get a new pre-amp (the sound is kinda brittle right now) but give me a few months to really get it all sorted and I'll gladly start playing songs about zombie prom queens, Roadsters driven by bats, and whatever other crazy psychobilly shit you can think of. 

I don't have many excuses though, the bassist for the Flame Trick Subs only has one hand.

EDIT:  Are you playing a hollow body?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 23, 2008, 03:08:03 AM
Nope.. some of these clips is either a fender jazzmaster or a hamer solidbody. I plan on getting a gretsch though -- but it'll probably be a solid (the jet model.. the umm.. the les paul shaped one).

Yeah the 4th Tiger Army album really veered into a place I don't like. It just sounds too much like AFI or something.

[edit] I'm not sure about Zombie porn queens. That's too innocent. I've always liked the seriousness of glenn danzig's lyrics -- how he could be campy, yet graphic about gore and depression in a way to make you question whether he was really fucking crazy or not. Heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 23, 2008, 06:51:19 AM
I'm not sure about Zombie porn queens.
What do you have against Signe??

I haven't had much time to practice the last couple weeks, which is killing me because now I have my new overdrive and I've pretty much dialed it in. It's so nice playing with good tone, even though I've got to crank the amp to get some of its gain going or the notes won't sing above the twelfth fret. My friend Jim keeps busting my balls about vintage tone, but I'm too spoiled by high gain amps when I was younger, I guess. Listening to a lot of Setzer lately makes me want one of these (http://fulltone.com/tte.asp), though...never be able to afford one of 'em!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 23, 2008, 09:49:12 AM
Heh, yeah just get an emulated echo. It's nice having that sound around period, authentic or not.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: WitchKiller on December 23, 2008, 12:28:45 PM

[edit] I'm not sure about Zombie porn queens. That's too innocent.

Well, I was thinking Zombie prom queens.  Maybe I'm too innocent.

I just went and checked up on Tiger Army's 4th album after you posted.  I only heard one song and I'll leave it at that.  Whenever I think of Tiger Army, I compare Fred Hell to Cliff Burton.  Shortly after he got wasted, the band's entire sound transformed.  Oh how different things might be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBNJ0etA2y8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBNJ0etA2y8)  Nothing is impossible, Stray.  Check out the Bassist's fret hand.  Go Go dancers and all


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 23, 2008, 03:07:27 PM
Well, I was thinking Zombie prom queens.  Maybe I'm too innocent.

Doh!

Quote
I just went and checked up on Tiger Army's 4th album after you posted.  I only heard one song and I'll leave it at that.  Whenever I think of Tiger Army, I compare Fred Hell to Cliff Burton.  Shortly after he got wasted, the band's entire sound transformed.  Oh how different things might be.

Yeah, I'm almost positive the AFI dudes had a hand in it. The two bands associate together a lot these days, and Tiger Army's sound has changed from it.

Hell, AFI used to not be a bad band either.

Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBNJ0etA2y8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBNJ0etA2y8)  Nothing is impossible, Stray.  Check out the Bassist's fret hand.  Go Go dancers and all

Nice. Ever heard of Jim Abbott? He's the Jim Abbott of bass players.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 24, 2008, 10:26:50 AM
[edit] Bah, sorry I'll get back to this later. :oh_i_see:

Postcount ++

Lol, I'm finding that a new song I made up sounds a lot like some Holy Water (Soundgarden) ripoff. Rockabilly though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 26, 2008, 05:23:04 PM
Sky, I was wondering, have you ever seen Sweet and Lowdown? Never brought that up. Not that many guitar movies, and it's a good one.

It's about a fictional guitarist named Emmet Ray -- self proclaimed "2nd greatest guitar player in the world", only after Django. He's haunted by that fact too.. Haunted by Django. If you don't like Sean Penn, you'll probably end up liking him after this. Good gypsy jazz soundtrack.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 26, 2008, 09:11:34 PM
I'll check that out, gypsy jazz rocks (err..jazzes?) and Woody Allen is great.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 26, 2008, 09:46:07 PM
Oh, well if you like Allen, then you'll definitely like it. He's in it, but as himself... he kind of does this movie as a mock biopic, with little bits of jazz commentary thrown in, like it's a documentary.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 26, 2008, 11:23:55 PM
Sweet & Lowdown...It's slow paced, but the soundtrack is awesome and Penn is excellent in it.

I just ordered one of these, Xmas present to myself...

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000NJY60S

http://www.digitech.com/products/Vocalist/VocalistLive4.php

Got it for $375 with free shipping. I messed with a prototype one at the Fat Man's house a couple of years ago and loved it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 27, 2008, 11:18:49 AM
Hmm, is it easy to use? Seems complicated!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 27, 2008, 02:49:37 PM
It isn't here yet -- probably won't even ship until Monday. But basically, you plug the guitar into the in jack (and out the thru), a mic (phantom powered or not) into the XLR jack, and you hit the pedal. Strum a chord, then open your mouth, and you get up to four part harmonies matching the chord you strummed. Hold the note, strum a new chord, harmonies follow the guitar. That's it.

There's a bunch of other options on it -- pitch correction, EQ, reverb, other vocal sweetener stuff, and a guitar tuner -- but that's the main point.

I found the prototype really easy to use as a singer (Fat Man was driving the knobs), though it did encourage singing a particular way to get the best harmonies out of it.

Just spent a nice three hours getting every instrument out of its case, polishing it, getting a new string onto the banjo, making sure everything was tuned to the piano... ahhh. Been a while since I got to really spend time with any instruments.

Rediscovered that little Fernandes Nomad. (This one (http://img.epinions.com/images/opti/69/7e/pr-Guitars_Basses-Fernandes_Star_Wars_Stormtrooper_Nomad_Guitar-resized200.jpg)). Sounds like a dirty quacky duck with its onboard amp -- good in its place, but not like the Gibson Melody Maker, for sure. Then I zeroed out everything on my acoustic amp and ran it into that on a clean cable. Dang. Chimy and very tight. Plays fast too. Now I need a project to use it on.

Is funny, all these instruments here, and I realized that I have barely bought any myself. Mostly gifts and inheritances and stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 28, 2008, 09:01:43 AM
I don't have a whole lot of instruments (YET), but I did pull out the Alvarez the last couple nights. I've mostly been playing the SG amplified, especially since I got the Fulldrive, or playing the Baby because I love the tone, even if the upper stuff isn't as accessible as the Alvarez.

Broke a string on the SG, I've been busting high E like fucking crazy, I used to be good for a year with a set of strings. I decided to load up on some extra 11s, I bought a six-pack of 'em from Ernie Ball. I also ordered a pack of pure nickel strings to check them out, still trying to tweak my string preferences. And until I get around to either learning how to set up my own guitar  :why_so_serious: or taking it to the shop when the good guy is in, I had to buy a pack of 46s to replace the 48s in the power slinky set. The bigger low E messes with my guitar's setup, but the rest of the set is really nice.

Dirty, quacky duck? Give it some funk!

edit Note my string breakage may be due to Buddy Guy/Albert King style two whole step bend kinda stuff. I bend and vibrato like a mofo. Actually been concentrating on making my vibrato even better after listening to some Kirwan in the early Mac. But I broke this one at the tuning peg, usually they go over the bridge pickup or lower, from my heavy pick attack and thick picks.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 28, 2008, 10:32:52 AM
Yeah, you should learn set up as much as possible. Saves cash. Techs are crooks... even the friendly ones.

Where is it breaking at? The bridge or up the neck?

I've been using those pure nickel ernie balls for years myself (at .011 as well). Been recently going smaller though.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 29, 2008, 01:00:07 AM
First song I have written on piano in maybe a decade and a half.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/12/29/the-sunday-poemsong-in-progress-the-road-ii/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 29, 2008, 10:52:57 AM
Pretty nice Raph. Are those string parts a second track, or just a second instrument on the keyboard?


That's a hefty bulk of lyrics! I'm trying to wonder how you sing all of them in a song like that.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 29, 2008, 12:13:04 PM
Craps out at about 39 seconds for me, I've been having trouble with your host or something for a while, Raph. Sounds great before that, I really wish I had your keyboard skills. Some extremely good lyrics, too.

Stray, I noted where my breakage was occurring. This time was odd because it broke up north of the nut, not sure I've ever done that before. New strings should be in today, psyched to get the SG plugged back in!

Here, blow your mind: http://www.dinosaurrockguitar.com/new/node/640 <--I wish I knew all this stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 29, 2008, 04:13:03 PM
Yeah, a lot of lyircs, it's still in progress and needs cut down. Glad you like them though, Sky! The progression you hear is F - C - Dm - Bb, and covers two lines of lyrics in what I posted...

I really do not have that much keyboarding skill. It's been like 15 years since I had my three months of lessons or noodled around with the one I had in high school.

The strings are a vibrato cello patch played as an overdub live on the keyboard. I don't know if I will leave that in the arrangement. It does thicken it up a bit, but the piano part is interesting enough on its own, I don't know if I want to gild the lily. I stuff too much in, usually, am trying to be good. :)

Direct link is http://www.raphkoster.com/music/RoadII.mp3


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 29, 2008, 07:55:36 PM
I just ordered one of these, Xmas present to myself...

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000NJY60S

http://www.digitech.com/products/Vocalist/VocalistLive4.php

Got it for $375 with free shipping. I messed with a prototype one at the Fat Man's house a couple of years ago and loved it.

That's pretty cool.  I remember when a thing called a "harmonizer" came out in the 80's and we used to use them a lot live when I was playing with a 3 piece.  The ability to follow guitar chord progressions is pretty nifty... I wish they had that ability back then.  All we used to be able to do is have them sing in intervals above or below our voice.  Then again, making a talk box out of a horn magnet and some fuel hose was high tech back then. 

Nice track by the way Raph.  I really need to start donating to this thread more.  If for no other reason than to show off my girlfriend's amazing voice. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 29, 2008, 10:22:20 PM
Here, blow your mind: http://www.dinosaurrockguitar.com/new/node/640 <--I wish I knew all this stuff.

The Guitar Player Repair Guide is a must have book, you should get it. You'll pick up a lot of things from it. I don't know how to do major repairs or anything, but it's good to be able to set up and install things the way you want. It's not hard at all, and you get exactly what you're going for that way. The only thing that requires some patience is setting up your truss rod, but that's nothing either.

[edit] Umm, anyways, if it's breaking somewhere near the nut, look for sharp edges on the nut or in the bridge pins. File em down.

Those are awfully old strings though. They're probably just naturally crapping out.

You sound like you play as much as me -- and I change at least every couple of months. Whether they're broken or not. Those nickel Ernie Balls are pretty cool sounding after a little playing too. They don't stay extremely bright for too long. They stay just right - for the classic rock/bluesy shit you and I like to listen to at least. Umm.. until, as I said, after a couple of months. There's a nice sound there in between though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 30, 2008, 06:25:09 AM
This thread is good reference. I've had the 11s on for a month and a half. I've heard people complain about the nickel strings getting dull, but I don't like my strings bright, so it should work out ok. It's funny how the brightness of the Fender amp colors my tone opinion, even though I've always favored "dead" strings. Nothing is really going to stop the high E from breaking, short of not bending like I do :) Especially after enduring over a month of it, I'm amazed they last that long. I expect it to break every time I go over a 1-1/2 step bend. On the V I tend to go for as much as I can physically push the bend and bring the bend back chromatically to the IV. That's pretty punishing on a string!

Anyway, I've got the repair guide. It's good, but that interview linked is beyond simple guitar shop setup and into a whole other level. My SG has a great setup, I wouldn't want to mess with it beyond tweaking it to accommodate 11s. Might need a new nut and a little tweak to the bridge.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 30, 2008, 09:05:12 AM
EVERY time I would setup my guitars/basses it was standard practice to cut a new nut.  I'm not sure it's possible to have a lasting setup without that. 

That article goes a bit beyond my comfort level and I used to do guitar work in my younger days.  Now, I'm too lazy and just let a local tech do it for me for $30.  Granted, he usually screws it up the first time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2008, 09:12:53 AM
What I'd really like to learn is amp modding, but that's a good way to get killed if you don't know what you're doing. Heh. But that's really where they charge you up the ass.. even for a simple rebiasing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 30, 2008, 09:22:56 AM
What I'd really like to learn is amp modding, but that's a good way to get killed if you don't know what you're doing. Heh. But that's really where they charge you up the ass.. even for a simple rebiasing.

I think I'm too easy to please.  When it comes to amps, here's my usual plan:

1) Find a head that provides clean power.  If I want warmth, I go tube.  Solid state for versatility.  More power usually provides the best foundation as long as the dynamic range is good. 

2) Find a well made cabinet and fill it with speakers that suit my playing style. 

3) Buy high quality effects.

4) Buy instruments with the sound foundation that you like.  If I were a serious guitar player, I'd have a strat, a tele, a les paul, an SG and an ES335. 

Effects these days can do everything you want with your amp for far less than the cost of modding.  Buy a good head and cabinet and they will take care of the rest.  A nice rack mount setup can really do wonders with a great amp and you can foot switch wave shapers and reverb/echo for changes on the fly.

NOTE: I realize that it's not practical to own this many instruments... the fundamental point is that with a good head and cabinet, you can shape your sound for minor additional expense. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2008, 09:58:51 AM
Bass players are always easy to please  :grin:

There's certain territory that can't be replicated without a bit of modding though. All effects color and center around the preamp stage, and overdrive just boosts and modifies the signal after it's already been outputted. A power stage mod can give everything more balls, even while keeping your overall sound. Take Eddie Van Halen's "Brown" sound. The sound on "Panama", for example, is the same exact amp (a Mashall Plexi/Superlead) that Hendrix used on dozens of his songs (say, Foxy Lady), and that Page and Angus used as well. It doesn't sound anything like them though -- and it wasn't his guitar or effects. He only had one pickup in his guitar, it was very basic. And only used a Phaser pedal occasionally. Wasn't all that big on effects.

There's also just little tweaks and stuff that have nothing to do with tone, but are good to know anyhow. Whether your reverb is humming a little and you want to cancel it out, or you change to a new tube model and need to rebias.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 30, 2008, 10:07:28 AM
If I were a serious guitar player, I'd have a strat, a tele, a les paul, an SG and an ES335. 

NOTE: I realize that it's not practical to own this many instruments...

Eep. (Counts the ten stringed instruments lined up here... though only 4 of them are guitars).

And what, nothing for slide? ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2008, 10:20:00 AM
I'd use a Tele for slide. Sounds like Swamp ooze.  :grin: And you get that subtle crackling, rattling sound on the bass strings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 30, 2008, 11:45:06 AM
If I were a serious guitar player, I'd have a strat, a tele, an es335, my sg, an lp, a gretsch, a reso, a taylor classical, a guitjo, the baby taylor....for starters...

I was like Nebs when I was playing bass. I had a strong, clean amp, solid state Kasino. Ran that into a couple 400W EV speakers. Had real nice thumb and definition, always went for a Geddy Lee tone. At first I used a couple pedals, an overdrive and a wah, but I dropped those pretty quickly and just played straight into the amp. Bass was so easy, most of it was in the fingers. Never liked the pickups on my bass, but maybe having to push the amp volume to make it louder was a good thing. With my wimpy bass amp (the peavey mark III), it sounds like thin ass. I put a guy's gibson grabber through it and it sounded much nicer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2008, 12:00:38 PM
My first good guitar was a Tele and I wish I had never gotten rid of it. Been wanting just a cheap one for awhile, but when I get around to it, I will set it up for slide. My Jazzmaster covers both a lot of Strat and Tele territory and then some. It does things that no other guitars do, so I won't part with it. I just need some hotter pickup equipped solidbody with a bigsby (like a Gretsch or LP with bigsby), and I'd be pretty happy. That little Hamer I bought is just a good beater, but it's basically a Strat ripoff with a humbucker and mid switch. I have a Floyd Rose Ibanez that I'm too lazy to fix, but that covers another front too.

I'd drop both my steel string and classical if I had a steel string with wider spacing. Or even better, some Selmer/Django thing. That would truly be bridging the gap between classical and steel string feel.

Anyhow, if I could, I'd have a hell of lot more amps than guitars.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 30, 2008, 12:22:45 PM
I admit I've been having the urge for at least a half-stack, Orange or Marshall. My ears thank my wallet.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2008, 01:34:18 PM
You could save a little money and get a Vox Valvetronix stack (or even pedal). The one thing they really excel at is their own Vox models (which Orange is somewhat modeled after, if you think of the Vox sound without the top boost) and their Marshall models. I've had one for years now and it's pretty nice. And not at all too "digitally". They've made it feel as analog as possible.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 30, 2008, 01:41:52 PM
Quote
What I'd really like to learn is amp modding, but that's a good way to get killed if you don't know what you're doing. Heh. But that's really where they charge you up the ass.. even for a simple rebiasing.

Re-biasing is exceptionally easy...all you need is a screwdriver and and voltmeter.  Tube amps almost always have plate voltage bleeder resistors, so if you turn off the amp, waiting for a minute or two, you are fine to go poking around.

I built a little 6W class A (like a Fender Champ) a while back:  if I can find some old images I'll upload them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2008, 08:36:23 PM
Better yet, post a clip. I'd love to hear it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 31, 2008, 06:13:17 AM
I have a hard time saving money by buying less than what I really want. I've learned to bide my time and save up. Actually makes you savor things more, too. Though my next five years are pretty much shot until I pay the truck off :| Glad I got a decent bar setup to tide me over, a half stack is WAY more than I'd ever use...especially since I've learned that I love pushing tubes.

Going to have to practice with my volume knob more. Some folks make it look so effortless, it distracts the hell out of me.

Miguel, more info on your amp would be cool!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 31, 2008, 09:09:25 AM
I have a hard time saving money by buying less than what I really want. I've learned to bide my time and save up. Actually makes you savor things more, too.

BINGO!  This is what I've been doing since I hit 30 and I've never regretted it.  Also, if you know EXACTLY what you want, you can occasionally grab a bargain on eBay though my luck has been hit and miss. I think I need to stick to Craigslist and want ads.  Buying new is just too crazy expensive and I tend to prefer the feel/look of vintage gear.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 31, 2008, 01:09:59 PM
Well, the good thing about digital amps is that it does make the idea of having many amps an affordable option. It's not the same, but good enough. There should at least be one important tone you're looking for though, and you get a real valve amp for that.. but it's nice to be able to fuck around with other sounds when you can.

Unfortunately, the same applies to pedals. Buy some real ones for the most important effects, but settle on a multi for other shit.

Unfortunately (again), I sold my good tube amp -- an early edition Custom Shop Vibro-King I got off of eBay for $900, but was worth about $3000  :awesome_for_real:. I couldn't resist selling it and making a profit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 02, 2009, 01:58:45 PM
This is so ridiculous that I had to share. (http://www.musiciansfriend.com/document?doc_id=104496&src=3TP9A2&ZYXSEM=0&Prime=ElectricGuitar)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 02, 2009, 02:18:44 PM
Yeah, they've been doing that for some time with a lot of "relic models". They also produce "new old stock" type of guitars that were painted with the methods of the past, and artificially faded to look like your Uncle Willy's cool Strat that he never played.

People are buying them though, funnily enough. Just like jeans, people like a worn out look. Unlike jeans, you're aren't going to find a vintage strat that isn't the same price as a house. So they've targeted that market this way instead.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ashrik on January 02, 2009, 06:11:14 PM
I done went and bought me one
Thanks for the help earlier. It's an Ibanez GSR200BK (http://www.thomann.de/gb/ibanez_gsr200bk.htm). The salesmen helped me out plenty, right up until the moment when started to push the $40 cords.


BOOM


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 02, 2009, 08:16:43 PM
Grats. Used to have one like that myself (but in that dark blue that many Ibanez guitars come in).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 02, 2009, 09:49:16 PM
To be fair to the sales guy, the cord you bought looks chintzy  :why_so_serious:

Cool bass, though!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ashrik on January 02, 2009, 11:38:21 PM
Thank you muchly.

I've decided to up my game by buying Bass Guitar for Dummies and downloading about 90 different books way above my skill level. I'm no doctor but I believe I can say with confidence that I will be a Rock God in 6 to 8 weeks.

Edit: Green text, in case the ghosts of my failed Wolverine joke lurk here.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 03, 2009, 12:17:01 AM
No, you're only playing bass, that's about right.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 04, 2009, 10:08:31 AM
I done went and bought me one

Nice choice.  Early on, I had an Ibanez and it was one of my favorite basses.  With the action set right, they have a really fast neck and a bright sound. 

Bass for dummies is also a nice book to start with.  There is a wealth of resources online (tabs, youtube, etc), so check that out as well. 

Enjoy!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2009, 05:07:46 PM
Allow me to rant about "production".. Do you have any pet peeves as far as sound goes?

I'm getting really fed up with too much space and reverb in recordings myself. I've indulged in it a bit too, but.. I don't know, I've been trying to make a mix tape lately, and perusing through tons of songs, and realizing how much I dislike recordings that sound that way. This is the extreme example, but I especially hate anything overtly "ethereal" -- especially keyboards with a lot of reverb -- you know, that sound that's popular with Trance, Enya types, or gothic metal.

Now here's where I'll find disagreement. I hate it in Classic Rock too. I hate it in really good stuff like King Crimson even. 21st Century Schizoid Man (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TrtwQXezaU) is an awesome song, but it'd be even better if it was straight up in your face. It just feels too distant to me.

The great majority of 80's recordings indulged in spaciousness too. Even thrash metal. And it kind of ruins it imo.

Yeah..anyways.. like I said: Rant.   :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 06, 2009, 07:10:22 PM
Well, which do you hate more... that or overdubbing to the point of ridiculousness?  I love me some Queen, but after Def Leppard, it became so much the norm that you rarely ever heard what the band was actually playiing.  You know it has gotten out of hand when bands have to start hiring extra musicians just to get a decent sound in concert.

Very VERY few bands have the talent to pull off two mic live recordings these days and it makes me sad.  I really love to hear a good live album where the band just played well in a nice acoustic setting. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2009, 07:42:10 PM
I don't mind overdubbing when the talent is there. I think some musicians -- like Freddie Mercury and Brian May -- have minds that exceed the rock format. They're not using recording as a crutch, but as a way to express their grand ideas. Then others are really very typical in their song structure -- like you can tell that the underlying song is basically the same, with or without fancy production. You can't say the same for Queen. I mentioned Death on Two Legs in another thread recently.. It's brilliant. But then, if they were just doing something more pop oriented, they never got carried away with making it sound more than it was. Another One Bites the Dust is a basic idea, and they recorded it in a basic way (same could be said for all songs like it.. they never indulged themselves).

[edit] Damn, keep on having to edit today


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on January 06, 2009, 07:51:37 PM
I done went and bought me one
Thanks for the help earlier. It's an Ibanez GSR200BK (http://www.thomann.de/gb/ibanez_gsr200bk.htm). The salesmen helped me out plenty, right up until the moment when started to push the $40 cords.


BOOM

That's a great little bass.  I've since given mine (same model and color even, though mine didn't have the active electronics) to a friend that was looking to start playing, but I find that I miss it on occasion.  Fortunately, he lives 3 blocks away so I still get to fuck around with it every now and then.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on January 06, 2009, 08:50:42 PM
The great majority of 80's recordings indulged in spaciousness too. Even thrash metal. And it kind of ruins it imo.

You're a youngster who is used to modern sound of over-compressing at the mastering stage. The good news for you is that some free software will allow you to remove all the dynamic range and any sense of 'spaciousness'. Unfortunately for people who prefer some semblance of a sound stage in their recordings, you can't go the other way.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2009, 09:00:14 PM
I knew it. I knew you'd come in and say that. :awesome_for_real:


Seriously though, I'm not really like that. There's certain sorts of spaciousness that can be intimate, I guess (Doors.. and umm.. Trip Hop in general.. just to name examples), and then there's something that makes me feel a bit removed from the music. I can't pinpoint why that it is though.. sorry.

In the extreme Enya/Goth Metal/Trance case, I not only feel removed -- I feel like the band is literally trying to pontificate to me -- from another dimension. Fuck that otherworldly shit. It's very dehumanized to me. [edit] Trying to induce a mood through "atmosphere", instead of letting a song stand on it's own to give me a mood rubs me the wrong way as well. But this could apply to a lot of things, I guess.

I like a lot of old stuff though. I'm a big Stones fan (already mentioned the Doors). Most of their stuff is right up front. Even when they were trying to be "otherworldly" (http://pierrecaubel.typepad.com/qui_si_frott_si_pik/files/rolling_stones_sympathy_for_the_devil.mp3), they'd make a mostly in-your-face song.

If you ask me, my sensibility comes from punk rock. I don't particularly enjoy a lot of overly compressed stuff on the radio these days. I just like things to be a little balls to the wall, even if it's folk.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2009, 09:35:03 PM
You know, now that we're talking about it, you know what's interesting to me? That Robert Johnson made his recordings played with his back turned on the mic, facing the corner of a wall. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd60nI4sa9A) This guy's sense of space is in a category all it's own. Heh. I mean, he sounds that way.. intimate, but like a man with his back turned on the world.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on January 06, 2009, 11:15:24 PM
When you said otherworldly with reference to the Stones, I thought for sure you'd be going here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIGdWzXhqlo). I do like a lot of music that is atmospheric, but I'll spare you the synth-led stuff in this thread and just give you some dreamy Manuel Gottsching (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cVaxPy16lw) guitar work instead. :P

You can do a lot with a microphone and placement. I'd take Robert Johnson or CAN standing around a single mic in the center of their studio (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtOXjNAIyPs) over any ProTools sanitized shit any day.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2009, 11:36:36 PM
Ah yes, the Stones' psychedelic phase. Heh.

I don't mind synths.. if there's stuff you want to post, have at it. I just don't like shit that borders on sounding like Yanni. :grin:

[edit] Yeah that guitarist you linked to is what I'm talking about as well. I've had enough of that kind of thing.

Oh, and don't get me wrong. One of my favorite guitarists does a lot of stuff like the above too (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxsDDk0DJgs) (Tom Verlaine). So I'm not trying to hate on your taste or anything.. I'm just not in the mood for that sort of sound anymore, I guess. Even when it's people I greatly admire.

Mind you though, he was a guy who went against everyone in his band once and recorded their first single by just plugging his guitar directly into the PA. The complete opposite of spacious production. Possibly in a bad way. It sounded like shit. Heh. Even funnier that he did it in the late-70's, when rock recording was moving towards extreme excess.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 07, 2009, 07:26:25 AM
Gah, production. I've mentioned before how my ideal of production got me into trouble in recording school. To guys who learned a board in the 70s and 80s, my ideas weren't going over well. My ideal production was a slightly more detailed version of what we got out of our boombox in our practice room. Just to get the drums sounding more like live miked drums (because thumping drums are good in metal). Our sound was so down and our set so tight, we didn't really have to dick around with tweaking things or multiple takes. Mic it up and go. We cut a three song demo in a studio and it wasn't better than the rehearsal tapes we pumped out every day.

Then I got used to that raw sound and it became my preference. It's tough listening to studio recordings, even of great bands. You lose the vitality most of the time, imo. I try to buy live albums when I can. If a band can't play live, fuck 'em. Not a band. I'm not too harsh on bands for bringing in mercs to fill things out, but it'd be better if they brought them into the band rather than hide them as a 'road band'.

Anyway, it is funny to see how people's ears are trained. Stuff that sounds great to me can sound awful to a listener. That's what's nice about playing for myself these days, if people don't like it, I don't give a fuck. I'm playing what I enjoy and makes me feel good.

Synths. Meh. Rush is one of the few bands I can endure that use synths. Maybe like Deep Purple or someone. I don't like much in the way of purely electronic music, though. I also like a band that has soul and can kick out songs in a more or less traditional fashion. I'm thinking of guys like Vai, Satriani or Johnson. Real clean production, even live, and boring and soulless.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 07, 2009, 08:26:39 AM
If you look at my home stereo equipment, it will tell you a lot about how unprocessed I like my music.  My preamp has nothing but an input selector and a volume knob.  No bass or treble adjustments.  Well recorded music will give you the feeling that you're in the same room with the band.  Over processed music makes you feel like you're listening to an iPod. 

This remaster of "Let it Be" (http://www.amazon.com/Let-Be-Naked-Beatles/dp/B0000DJZA5) is a great example of what I mean.  It removes the Spector "wall-of-sound" from the equation and lets you hear the band as they were meant to be.  If you have a good home system, the staging is wonderful. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on January 07, 2009, 11:59:32 AM
The great majority of 80's recordings indulged in spaciousness too. Even thrash metal. And it kind of ruins it imo.
The 80's were horrible, yes.  And today is not much better.  But I cite Slayer's Reign In Blood album as the perfect example of what thrash metal should sound like - 2 guitar channels, 1 bass channel, mic'd drums, and vocals.  Nothing else, no fancy synths, no fancy vocal work, no phase shifting, etc.  And able to be perfectly reproduced live if so chosen to.  That album could have been recorded yesterday or 10 years or 20 years ago - it doesn't have a stigma of the recording timeframe imprinted on it giving it a dated sound.  Other bands require multiple guitarists or special electronics to get their sound, I prefer the whole ethos that if it can't be reproduced on stage without multiple instrument changes or having many backing tracks, you've got a problem.  Not that the song is necessarily bad or unworthy, just that something has changed.  Queen ran into this problem with Bohemian Rhapsody and most of their following albums, but it was still great music.  Just not something you could reproduce live easily without multiple recordings playing.  I just find it hard to get into music that has several synth tracks, a drum machine, multiple vocal tracks, all in addition to what is going on with the regular band on-stage.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Grimwell on January 07, 2009, 01:08:05 PM
I favor bands who can walk in and lay it down in one recording over bands who noodle; but at heart I prefer a nugget of wisdom that Jake E. Lee gave up in a magazine interview post-Ozzy.

He basically said that the studio and live experiences are different and that when he's in the studio his focus is on making a good record and he will willingly take advantage of things the studio offers (him being able to play more than one guitar track, etc.). When he's live he does not try to recreate the studio. He can't. He instead focuses on doing a good live show.

Jake may not have been the greatest guitarist in the world (I like him and that's good enough for me), but I liked how that made sense. The studio is not a stage, don't be confused. Use each for different purposes.

I prefer the sound of a good band on stage to the studio any day, but I don't expect the stage of the studio.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 08, 2009, 09:50:13 AM
http://www.stewmac.com/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 08, 2009, 10:24:41 AM
Yes?


That Guitar Player Repair Guide was written by the guy who's the brains behind that operation, I believe.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 08, 2009, 07:22:02 PM
That's where the abalone dot on my Melody Maker came from. :) Only had one missing...

That Digitech pedal arrived today but am still at work but will try it shortly  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 11, 2009, 09:42:49 PM
And... I got to try it, but barely. :P I also upgraded ACID, and spent like four hours dealing with all that did to my setup. It came with Garritan Aria, and now I need a small controller with a mod wheel to use that correctly. And it came with that Native Guitar Combos thing, which I can't get to send me the stupid email for the reg process, which is nuts: register. Get code. Enter code. Get sent image with encrypted crap in it. Drag image onto reg tool. Save image forever bc if you lose it and need to reinstall you are screwed.

What with all that (plus the random trip-to-take-kids-to-Star-Trek-exhibit) I haven't actually gotten to try using any of the new toys seriously. My kids have had fun with it though. :P


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 12, 2009, 01:44:40 AM
My dry periods in playing coincide with the shittyness of how my guitars sound.

It's a weird phenomenon. Everything sounds "tinny". Like shit. Therefore I can't play.

Looking forward to some clips Raph


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 16, 2009, 06:34:29 AM
I've been trying to find a good strap for so long. There is so much garbage out there! I'm still using a free crapstrap (nylon and fake leather 2", the ubiquitous "I'll even throw in a strap!" type strap) that I've had for fifteen years. I've got a decent black leather strap for my bass, but I'd like to have one better suited to guitar height.

I think I've found a good candidate, if I can find them for sale somewhere.

http://www.levysleathers.com/product;cat,127;item,490;Urban-Prints-MN3P

They've also got some cool stuff over here:

http://www.eldoradostraps.com/products-over.htm

And I've thought about emailing Jodi down in NYC to see if she'll make me a custom version of the autographed Buddy Guy strap I have, because it rocks and I don't want to fuck up the autograph on it (and it's polka-dotted...).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 16, 2009, 06:40:28 AM
I've been using something like one of THESE (http://www.zzounds.com/item--EAGNLS25BK) for years.  $20 or so and they last forever.  Add strap locks and you're good to go.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 16, 2009, 06:52:29 AM
I use a old timey Fender strap.. Strap locks as well. Kinda only look good on Fenders though.

I've got a plain black Kepur (http://www.coreoneproduct.com/pages/products.html) strap as well -- thing is tough as hell.. and you don't need straplocks. Just not very comfortable though.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on January 16, 2009, 02:26:49 PM
A question to any and all bass players out there.

i have been playing for quite a long time (~15 years) off and on.  I found I quickly progressed in the first few years, however I have languished at the same level for about the past 10 or so.

I'm wondering about techniques to play faster.  I've always had it in the back of my mind that in order to get a good tone, one must do a single finger pluck per note.  However guitar players never do this:  at certain speeds, they can single pick, but at some point, they begin picking on the up and down stroke.  At even faster speeds, they pick every other note, and hammer-on consecutive notes.  At very fast speeds, they may only be picking every other note.  In fact, when you want insane speed players like John Petrucci play, their right hand is relatively quiet, and the left hand is soundings notes by hammer-on and pull-off techniques.  I think guitar players can get away with this and get good tone.

However I have found on bass, unless you give a single right-hand finger pluck (for us right handed players) per note it just doesn't 'sound' right.  However when I see Youtube videos of other players doing very fast licks (say, 120bpm at 16th note speed), that many of them are only picking every other note.  I'm wondering if it's a matter of needed to hammer-on with the fingers of the left hand much harder than I have ever tried before.  I spent a lot of time trying to get three and four finger plucking technique down on my right hand to gain speed, but it's pretty difficult to single pluck every note at those speeds, especially when switching from string to string.  I see a lot of these players getting very fast speeds without using three or four fingers.

Am I on the right track here?  I thought that maybe I would try some scales where instead of plucking every note with three fingers. I plucked every other note (1,3,5, etc)  then did hammer on's to the even notes.

Check out this Youtube clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdT8g-tNvXU

At around the 30 second timeframe there are some 32nd note patterns.  He's clearly not single picking at those speeds, but it *sounds* like he is.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 16, 2009, 04:30:10 PM
When I need to play fast with my fingers, I use the back and forth motion on both fingers.  It makes use of each finger like a pick and allows you to get 4 notes from a 2 note movement.  When I was practicing a lot, I used to practice using one finger at a time like a pick (front back front back of the finger like a pick) and then do two fingers as a 1234 pattern.  I think Vic Wooten may have some youtube footage doing this kind of thing. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: K9 on January 16, 2009, 07:16:55 PM
(http://www.filedump.net/dumped/wang71232162443.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on January 16, 2009, 08:14:02 PM
I've been trying to find a good strap for so long.
This is funny.  The strap on my guitar has a pink, violet, and turqoise pattern that reminds me of the old arcade game Space Invaders.  It's warped but is decently strong and feels good compared to the cheap crap you can buy now (probably what they thought about it when it was new).  It came for free with a bass guitar that I got out of a pawn shop, which I no longer have.  It's hysterical that I paid $50 for the guitar that turned out to be warped and broken after a month of playing it, yet I still kept the strap.  My $50 strap!  Too bad it doesn't match the red and black zebra striping on the guitar, although it is a good conversation piece when people comment on my shitty looking gear that is plugged into a higher dollar amp.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 17, 2009, 09:35:24 AM
I really want something gaudy like that, with a Van Halen-esque Kramer to go with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 22, 2009, 08:53:51 AM
I have been playing for quite a long time (~15 years) off and on.  I found I quickly progressed in the first few years, however I have languished at the same level for about the past 10 or so.
I found there is a physical wall, where you can hit the limit of what your genetics have given you. I've got pretty stubby fingers, but practicing for over eight hours a day when I was in school pushed them to the limits of what they could do. I was just doing some insanely fast stuff, wish we had been recording more back then. Hell, wish my singer hadn't given away most of the recordings we did make...

Anyway, I used to watch Steve Harris play and he drove me nuts, I could never figure out how he played so fast. For our fastest thrash metal songs, I usually needed a pick, because they were physically impossible to play with fingers. I used to write a lot of triplet-based stuff because I had a great three-finger triplet (think The Trooper) that I actually stole from my singer, who was the world's worst guitarist. He played "fingerstyle" because he hated the pick, and he had this weird three finger strum thing he did. When I picked up the bass, I remembered that and it became the basis of my triplet style. I also used a ton of syncopation because A) it's awesome and B) easier to play fast than a straight-note passage.

So for right hand, I mostly used alternating index and middle, bolstered by the triplet stroke above and the four-finger chorded fingerstyle that's basically a rip of classical guitar style. We only had two songs that were too fast to play with my fingers.

One reason I used to practice Anesthesia so much was that it had a bunch of different styles all jumbled up in one piece, a good warmup. There are some of my triplets using three fingers (ima), some hammering and pulling, some chorded fingerstyle (pima), some fast passages and arpeggios. I'll link my crappy youtube version, though it was much better in the day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm6KMVEUDt0


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 22, 2009, 09:03:44 AM
Great stuff Sky.  I remember watching that the first time you posted it.  It has a great combination of styles and techniques.  If you consider that rusty, you must have been one hell of a player in your prime. 

I'd love to see a full length shot of your bass front and back (or a link to a manufacturer site).  Looks like an interesting body shape. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 22, 2009, 11:36:55 AM
I think of this as plateaus. And every few years, I break through one and my perception of the instrument changes. I think some of it isn't just practice, but also stepping away from habits. For me, alternate tunings didn't just teach me alternate tunings -- it opened up new techniques which went back over to standard playing. Mandolin opened up different lead playing on guitar. Learning a bunch of cover songs opened up new rhythmic stuff.  And so on.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 22, 2009, 01:56:50 PM
Thanks, Nebs. It's beyond rusty :P I only pick up the bass a couple times a year, my right hand is crap and my left is a lot weaker. The only pic I have of the bass right now is from this batch I did a year or two ago: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/228/512239226_7348baefa7_o.jpg and you still can't see it very good in that shot. I'll get some of it for you to check out.

It's always been a mystery to me. I bought it in the ESP shop on Sunset, which wikipedia says didn't exist until 1993 (I bought it in 1991 iirc). The guy had it in the back of the shop and assembled it for me, told me they weren't US models and that it was custom, the nameplate is Edwards. I'm still not sure on the custom part, but wiki says they were made for a japanese market and slightly higher quality than the US ESPs were. Dunno, I just know it has an amazing neck and crappy pickups. I've never seen one like it and actually can't find a pic on the intarweb, either.

Raph, there are plateaus and then there are genetic physical limitations. There is only so much you can push your muscular and skeletal systems, and I found it after over a year of playing at peak performance. I got /better/ as I learned more things and ways to play, but there was a hard physical limit on how fast I could alternate fingerpick the bass. Most people don't have the time to find that limitation, so I consider myself lucky.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 28, 2009, 07:15:00 AM
I'm in such a rut lately. Anyone doing anything interesting or inspiring?

I haven't made a single recording since I moved into the house. Scratch that, I did make one awful early rock song, but it was just an idea jot, and that was months ago. Need to work on repertoire, spinning my wheels with theory practice. Blah, I hate these periods. Luckily I've been doing this long enough that I know there's some great inspiration just around the corner to get me going again. Just hope it gets here soon.

Talking with some blues bassists on another forum, I might ride out the rut with some bass playing to change things up. I got everyone pissed off because I railed against the idea of bass as merely a support instrument. It's actually why I don't play blues bass (and hardly know how), because most of the good guitarist/singers in the area fall under the small-minded/egotistical idealism that the band is there to support them, whereas coming from the background of my band where everyone was an equal it just seems like some odd form of musical slavery..."Yes, massah, I jes' sit back here in da back o da stage and play reeeal nice, massah!"


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 28, 2009, 09:59:59 AM
I wrote a GREAT song this past weekend. :) It has been stuck in my head for days, and stuck in my daughter's head too, she's been wandering around singing it. It's just bouncy happy singalongy infectious, if you know what I mean. And it works great with that harmonizing pedal thing I got (which I am starting to get the hang of). I hope to record it this weekend.

Lyrics:

Got some sand in my pocket and a wink in my eye
Got skipping hopping tripping and a sun in the sky
Got a whistling a tune and an orchestra mine
And the whole world’s humming like the fruit on the vine
There’s some knowing and some growing that’s about to go by
With green grass showing all its pointy pride

Chorus-
It's the last song going on its own way
It's all our dreams sailing on the bay
It's the way we hold hands on a summer's day
It's the way, it's the way, it's the way it's the way

If the sun shines through your hair I might go blind
If the laughter jingle jangles all the sparks in your eyes
With the sidewalk a cracking and the gardens alongside
The street crossing zebra with the stripes on its hide
The clouds are blue the sky is white, we’re all upside down
And the dizzy whizzy world is dancing us around, yeah yeah yeah

bridge -
But don’t don’t, don’t don’t, do-do-do don’t
Say no, no, no, no, no, no, you won’t
It’s the way , it’s a yes, it’s the way, yes, say hey hey hey yeah

Got some sand in my pocket and what is it for?
There’s a whole beach full of seashells and a whole lot more
Kites and parades and an acrobat
A big brass band bouncing, how about that
Come on let’s put our hands together now
I promise not to pull your hair if you kiss me

It’s the last song last dance first kiss first chance
Pillows dreaming birds a cheering tap tap tap heels clack hear that
It’s the way, it’s the way, it’s the way, it’s the way
And the whole world’s humming like the fruit on the vine
There’s some knowing and some growing that’s about to go by


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 28, 2009, 08:54:08 PM
Probably old to you guys, but I've never seen this Stanley Jordan Stairway (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjXN3OLgoqs) rendition before. I don't give a fuck about his jazzy tone. That's pretty much beyond sick. Not even sick. He's accompanying himself. Lol


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 28, 2009, 09:45:19 PM
I always thought he added too many notes. :) But he's a monster player. This two guitar tapping stunt is... nuts.

Have you heard stuff on the Chapman Stick? It's all tapping, and played almost pianistically. I've got one bob Culbertson album... here's a version of Little Wing he did:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcZ7Deu0V9A


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 28, 2009, 10:41:07 PM
Pretty cool. He does take the blues out of a bit, but it's a great tune in it's own right.


These kind of guys humble me to the point that I think my playing isn't THAT much better than playing Guitar Hero. I need to start merely referring to myself as a "songwriter". I am NOT a guitar player or instrumentalist in any real sense. :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on January 28, 2009, 11:19:49 PM
Probably old to you guys, but I've never seen this Stanley Jordan Stairway (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjXN3OLgoqs) rendition before. I don't give a fuck about his jazzy tone. That's pretty much beyond sick. Not even sick. He's accompanying himself. Lol
He was one of the "speakers" at one of my high school's career days :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on January 28, 2009, 11:25:39 PM
I always thought he added too many notes. :) But he's a monster player. This two guitar tapping stunt is... nuts.

Have you heard stuff on the Chapman Stick? It's all tapping, and played almost pianistically. I've got one bob Culbertson album... here's a version of Little Wing he did:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcZ7Deu0V9A
Yeah I saw him play somewhere a while back which I can't even remember and ended up getting his Cafe San Francisco album.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 28, 2009, 11:40:45 PM
Just to post another guy I discovered recently, who humbles me. Jimmy Rosenberg.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzkQt4QAhHk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzkQt4QAhHk)


These days (almost 30 now), he's apparently in and out of jail, but it's pretty badass that's he been so good since so young. Playing Django as a kid is a helluva lot more cool than playing Crazy Train, if you ask me. Apparently, his brothers are pretty well known Gypsy Swing guys, but Jimmy is the one known for more improvising.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2009, 12:53:50 AM
To get off the subject of geniuses, but to stick with gypsies, this guy rocks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjRKsoMM2QI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjRKsoMM2QI)

All of them rock actually, but the second guy, I mean. His name is Titi Demeter. Seems to play a little slower than most of these type of guitarists, but he sounds better (imo).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2009, 07:24:46 AM
I saw Jordan waaay back in the 80s when I was a kid, he was on Letterman or something. Blew my widdle mind, but was one of my early enlightenment moments where I saw that the guitar (or bass) are instruments to be played in whatever way makes them sound good. I even saw Limp Bizkit a few times because their guitarist is very talented in the Jordan style of double-tapping, especially their first couple of tours.

That Chapman Stick is cool, and the guy playing it is pretty talented. But I think he overplays it and kinda kills the mood of the piece. Also kinda stretches out too far trying to play fast passages and screwed up a couple times. My playing is a constant struggle to not overplay :)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2009, 08:24:25 AM
Yeah, it's pretty silly when people start making up rules. There were comments in that vid like "tapping and hammer ons are just for fill-ins, not a whole song. This is just masturbatory!" I hate - hate in the truest sense of the word - anyone who talks like that. About any subject really. There's personal taste, and then there are rules you try to make for everybody. You should probably get punched for the latter. Hell, I'm pretty sure the guitar's history wouldn't exist if it wasn't for rule breaking. And rules might be the very thing holding other instruments back from being as popular.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on January 29, 2009, 07:47:40 PM
Tommy Emmanuel is another guitarist with an "unorthodox" style, using his guitar as a percussive instrument in many of his songs (he's also a drummer):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZzUCuCosnE&NR=1


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on January 30, 2009, 03:44:52 AM
Tommy Emmanuel is another guitarist with an "unorthodox" style, using his guitar as a percussive instrument in many of his songs (he's also a drummer):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZzUCuCosnE&NR=1


I love his version of "Somewhere over the rainbow", the beginning reminds me of Zelda http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZNJf-h7F8s awesome guitar playing though.

I went to see this guy a few years ago his intermittent percussion while playing was unreal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DH41Vnkq44, here's some of his music philosophy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oPXRWRxda8.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 30, 2009, 04:36:40 AM
His soloing style is a little too egg heady for me, but I love the philosophy, and subject matter he's interested in.


[edit] On that note, I really - really like musicians who are in touch with the "blues-y" side of music (in any particular culture), but keep the hooks alive, and not get too technical. Who can make it popular music, and not experimental. I am blown away by how many great musicians there are out there -- hell, on youtube particularly -- but sometimes they get a bit.. indulgent.. is the word, I guess. Be they blues, jazz, renaissance types, cajun, bluegrass, etc.. Less is more sometimes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on January 30, 2009, 06:08:41 AM
There were comments in that vid like "tapping and hammer ons are just for fill-ins, not a whole song. This is just masturbatory!" I hate - hate in the truest sense of the word - anyone who talks like that.
I totally agree.  I can understand the sentiment, high technical skill isn't going to save a boring song, but at the same time adding extra embelishments to a good song can really make a great song.  These are the same type of people who think that dropping to D and playing power chords with 1 finger is all you ever need to do to make a good song.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 30, 2009, 06:17:47 AM
I guess... it's just all about balance. I mean, yeah, it's possible to get "masturbatory", but using a tapping technique doesn't necessarily mean that. No more than using slide through a whole song is masturbatory. Although I guess you can get masturbatory in how you express it all. But that applies to regular fretting too.

Like I said above, my own particular tastes swing towards hooks, so I do prefer things a bit more sparse -- but I believe you can express great skill through that too. Most of the great "guitar gods" did just that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on January 30, 2009, 06:24:05 AM
Yeah, it's pretty silly when people start making up rules. There were comments in that vid like "tapping and hammer ons are just for fill-ins, not a whole song. This is just masturbatory!" I hate - hate in the truest sense of the word - anyone who talks like that. About any subject really. There's personal taste, and then there are rules you try to make for everybody. You should probably get punched for the latter. Hell, I'm pretty sure the guitar's history wouldn't exist if it wasn't for rule breaking. And rules might be the very thing holding other instruments back from being as popular.

Well I hope you agree however that a lot of guitarists do such stuff just for showing off. I once went to a Deep Purple concert where the guys actually played a 45 minute rendition of 'smoke on the water' including two guitar solos plus drum and keyboard solo. That was way beyond rulebreaking and clearly in the realm of 'look how awesome a guitarist I am'. There is a fine line between brealking rules and creating great music and just showing off your giant musician's ego on stage. Unfortunately too many guitarists today are on the wrong side of that line.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 30, 2009, 06:49:54 AM
Yeah.. like I said, I like hooks -- which is just another way to say emphasis on the song. I mean, I guess it's cool to masturbate if that's what your listeners want. Most listeners want something to bob and groove to though, I think. Or something to identify with clearly -- even if it's not overtly groovy stuff, you should be trying to identify and speak to listeners, right, touching their mood.. something? I think it's the funniest when some people play the blues, for example, and aren't actually showing any bluesiness at all! They're showing that they're pretty damn pleased with themselves. Heh. Like the whole idea of what the blues is about is a joke to them. "My Baby left me.. blah blah blah" <insert sterile guitar solo here>

But, Son House (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI0Ux3-JoBc) was not a fucking joke, no matter how much better you play than him.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sigil on January 30, 2009, 12:30:49 PM
Chapman stick, Warr guitar, look at trey gunn and Tony levin for some fascinating interplay. but that goes more into newer crimson, which isn't everyones bag.


Greg Howard does some nice stick work as well.

I play, but merely for myself, although I had a huge leap after ten years in a rut and it's made me think more about collaborating with others.

I will own a stick one day. and I will grove to my own beat, probably in the basement in headphones.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on January 31, 2009, 02:25:30 AM
Yeh Brozman is a bit "egg-heady" watching him live is quite enjoyable though, he swaps instruments from sitar to weissenborns, to ukelele and plays  numerous musical styles cajun hawaiin indian/blues so I really enjoyed the show from the eclectic mix and the historical value. I got some of his blues-Dvds, but I learned more really from sitting on a beach jamming with an awesome street busker (it kinda helped that I was totally baked on cookies at the time too).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on January 31, 2009, 05:40:55 PM
Tony levin

Here is a photo I took of him playing his stick with Liquid Tension Experiment at NEARfest last year:



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sigil on February 01, 2009, 06:13:22 AM
I envy you, it's been twenty years since I've seen him live


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on February 01, 2009, 08:41:42 AM
King Crimson were even better, but Robert Fripp didn't want us to bring cameras to that one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sigil on February 01, 2009, 11:02:21 AM
Fripp's disdain of cameras is legendary.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 03, 2009, 09:46:54 AM
Trying to bust this rut, I decided to start working on this book (http://www.amazon.com/Mel-Cantigas-Renaissance-Festival-Favorites/dp/078664432X), from one of my favorite bands. Great stuff, and I highly recommend it if you dig traditional music. Worth it for the CD alone!

The book is notation of the main melody and some chord names, so there's a lot of room to interpret. Sometimes the chords seem off, not sure if that's the instrumentation or if they're just not showing inversions and extensions and whatnot. I'm putting the notation into tab, which is a good exercise in reading. Hopefully I can get a few good numbers workable and then sit in with the band this summer :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sidereal on February 03, 2009, 10:25:24 AM
Random fact:  Trey Gunn's (step-?)kid goes to school with my kid.  Also Dave Matthews' twins.  We run into each other frequently at bake sales and what not.  Trey's Warr guitar is some fucked up shit.  I don't have the heart to tell him I hate prog rock.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sigil on February 03, 2009, 03:25:35 PM
I wouldn't have the heart to tell him that Tony will always be better than him at stick.

However, cool to know.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 10, 2009, 11:32:12 AM
To get off the subject of geniuses, but to stick with gypsies, this guy rocks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjRKsoMM2QI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjRKsoMM2QI)

All of them rock actually, but the second guy, I mean. His name is Titi Demeter. Seems to play a little slower than most of these type of guitarists, but he sounds better (imo).


I've been obsessed with this song lately. It's called Bossa Dorado. Kind of new chords for me... Especially the F#m Diminished.. thing. Easy phrases to learn, but not so easy to wrap my head around and improvise. But it's a nice step into gypsy/rumba type of rhythms.

This guy points out the chords:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqO1MWT5fSo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqO1MWT5fSo)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 10, 2009, 11:38:49 AM
Very cool tune.  The first guy playing leads makes me think I should sell all my guitars and just give up on the instrument.  His dexterity is amazing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 10, 2009, 11:46:37 AM
The second suit guy, like I said above, is what I wish I sounded like. As for dexterity, this guy Joscho Stephan is crazy on this song. I still like it a little smoother though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_jzSv7G6vQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_jzSv7G6vQ)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 23, 2009, 10:57:10 AM
Cool DTB contest (http://www.indabamusic.com/contests/show/dtb?utm_medium=legacy-email&utm_source=derektrucks&utm_campaign=legacy-email|derektrucks|20090221).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sigil on February 23, 2009, 11:19:14 AM
I recieved a Baby Taylor as  a prize in a drawing.

Wow.

for such a small guitar, just wow.

I'd never experienced a piece of equipment elevating my playing, but I was putting out stuff I'd never been able to express outside of my head. additionally my repitoire of covers just about tripled as  stuff from twenty years ago came to me and I was able to put chords and rhythm together in way's I'd never seen.


So, although I can't swing anything else now, I know this won't be the end.

I prefer a smaller fretboard. the spacing on the baby felt perfect to me. am I stuck playing overgrown uke's for my best performances?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 23, 2009, 11:33:14 AM
Well, a lot of Martin's have a similarly skinny neck, but are full size bodies. Might want to check some out. Look for any model @ 1 11/16.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 23, 2009, 11:36:44 AM
Taylors are amazing guitars, I love my Baby. She does need some setup, though, too long in a non-temp controlled closet is starting to mess with the intonation. I have the mahogany one and it's the most mellifluous sounding instrument I've heard. I have a sitka spruce-top Alvarez jumbo that is nowhere near as loud or rich, despite costing almost twice as much as the Baby.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 23, 2009, 11:50:17 AM
I can barely do what I want on my guitar, it's too small, yet it's still wider than a baby.

I'm saving up for something big, like 1.8". Something that plays like my classical, but isn't a classical. I feel the opposite - that I can pull off better stuff the wider the spacing is. I'm just torn between finding a fingerstyle steel string, or getting some gypsy guitar. Both would be wide, but both are totally different niches.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 23, 2009, 07:07:34 PM
I need to bring my Baby back to the office so she gets played... I know exactly what you mean about it elevating your playing though... it opened up new tonal atreas for me that I was then able to take back to the other guitars.

Maybe you should try parlor fingerstyle guitars?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: sigil on February 23, 2009, 10:28:52 PM
I need to bring my Baby back to the office so she gets played... I know exactly what you mean about it elevating your playing though... it opened up new tonal atreas for me that I was then able to take back to the other guitars.

Maybe you should try parlor fingerstyle guitars?

That's exactly it. It was like a door was opened.

I'll  definitely look at the recommendation




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 24, 2009, 11:08:56 PM
As promised ages and ages ago, here's some stuff using the Digitech Vocalist Live 4 pedal. Basically, this thing lets you do up to 4 part harmonies that track the guitar chords. You can choose from 50 presets, or make up your own.  Here's an MP3 file with three songs I have written recently -- I posted the lyrics to one a couple of pages back. In these, I stuck to a few presets.

All of these are basically quick live renditions, so forgive the over-reverb and stuff -- not worked up AT ALL.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/harmonysampler.mp3

1st tune, "Woodson Song," is in a crazy tuning -- capo on second fret, partial 3-4-5 at fret 6. Preset is "Bass Altos" I think. I played the song too fast, alas.

2nd tune, "It's The Way," some present called "Alt Harmony" -- basically, uses inversions on the harmony parts I think. Yah, there's a bad bass part there too, please ignore. I tried doing main vocal and harmony guide vocal separate here, didn't work as well. This one is also in a crazy partial capo tuning, just slightly less crazy than the last one.

3rd tune, "Two Bodies," just a female duet voice. And the guitar is too loud, sorry -- it ought to sound spare and empty and instead it's jangly. And yes, another crazy partial capo tuning. ;) On this one, I play behind the partial capo for some of it...

So there you go, that's what it can do. It is taking a bit to master it -- I don't usually play with pedals for punching in and out; expression, sure, but remembering to punch in and not miss the one pedal out of four is something I keep messing up. And getting the mix right is tricky. But it's definitely adding something.

Feedback on the tunes welcome too. ;)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on February 24, 2009, 11:31:25 PM
Taylors are amazing guitars, I love my Baby. She does need some setup, though, too long in a non-temp controlled closet is starting to mess with the intonation. I have the mahogany one and it's the most mellifluous sounding instrument I've heard. I have a sitka spruce-top Alvarez jumbo that is nowhere near as loud or rich, despite costing almost twice as much as the Baby.

Baby's a killer guitars!  I have a full-sized Taylor (420B), which I love and is the far superior guitar, but the Baby Taylor is so much guitar for such a small price tag.

I heard great things about them and went to buy one when I was traveling a lot for work.  I looked at them and thought, "What a bunch of GARBAGE!!!"  They just looked so damn cheap and cheesy.  Then I started playing them and it was a revelation.  They are tiny, but sound bigger than just about any student-level, and full-sized guitar I've heard.  Plus they play easy, like an electric.

While nothing close to the problems presented by, say a Martin Backpacker, they do have intonation issues.  But for the size, sound, price, and surprising durability for something that looks so cheap, they are killer guitars.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 25, 2009, 06:03:56 AM
Dunno Raph, the bass alto sounds good but the others sound like an effect more than additional voices, at least to my ears. I know what you're saying about pedals, too. I hate just about anything that distracts my fragile mind, part of why I can't sing and play anything complex.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 25, 2009, 09:15:01 AM
Dunno Raph, the bass alto sounds good but the others sound like an effect more than additional voices, at least to my ears. I know what you're saying about pedals, too. I hate just about anything that distracts my fragile mind, part of why I can't sing and play anything complex.

Well, it IS an effects pedal. :)

I've done a fair amount of emulating backing vocals via pitch shifters and effects, and the big thing here is just how easy it is. No fiddly trying to match the pitch shift note by note. It follows the chords for you. In the first example, there's four chords per line for the chorus. Same in the last example. But the harmony effect doesn't sound out of tune unless I am singing flat. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 10, 2009, 04:24:43 PM
Hmm. Guess what I found out this evening? The AC outlet in the back of my FJ has enough juice to power my guitar amp.

 :drill: :drill: :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on March 12, 2009, 11:12:01 PM
BTW, I saw you guys were talking about Chapman Sticks.  I have owned one for years and aside from messing with it for a few days, have never touched the thing.  If someone is interested in buying one, PM me. 

I'm the third owner of this one.  The first guy was a professional musician who used it regularly.  The second owner was just like me - a guitar player who thought it would be cool, but just never used it and played his guitars. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 13, 2009, 06:30:06 AM
If I had any money in my budget for non-guitar stringed instruments, it'd be a charango and a viola de gamba.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 11, 2009, 07:16:18 AM
Open G is an oddly good cockrock tuning. Who woulda thought? ;D Does anyone here know a lot of Mick Mars stuff? Some of the riffs I'm coming up with sound kind of Crue-ish. Either way, he's a pretty tasteful guitarist (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g34vmj2EdS8). Fuck it, no shame in admitting it.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Grimwell on April 11, 2009, 08:50:22 AM
No shame at all. He's better than their music (and I'm a Crue fan). I caught them live a few years back, for the first time ever, and he was pretty mean to his guitars. He does not touch things lightly, to say the least. It was fun to watch someone hang the entire guitar by the tremolo bar and let it bend some strings for effect.

Plus, he nailed the songs. Age and time didn't cause him to try to reinterpret the songs as something else. He knew what most of the drunk folks wanted, and ripped the old stuff right up. I'd kinda like to see him do a solo album with the focus on guitar and not three minute songs. Just to see what he would put out there. I think he's better than the bands reputation. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 12, 2009, 10:03:59 AM
Yesterday was the first time I have gotten to touch the strings in weeks. Trolled the Net for new material to noddle with, figured out the basics of Chris Whitley's "Phone Call from Leavenworth" (standard tuning, picked, not slide, though I want to tackle that at some point) and "Big SKy Country"... then got Chuck Brodsky's "Bill & Annie" off the recording.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Famine on April 12, 2009, 10:20:14 AM
Open G is an oddly good cockrock tuning. Who woulda thought? ;D

I use to love playing in Open G when I was in the 'metalcore' listening phase for some very odd reason. I couldn't deal with it in the end. Now I just stick to Drop D or standard.  :heartbreak:

Quote from: Sky
Taylors are amazing guitars, I love my Baby. She does need some setup, though, too long in a non-temp controlled closet is starting to mess with the intonation. I have the mahogany one and it's the most mellifluous sounding instrument I've heard. I have a sitka spruce-top Alvarez jumbo that is nowhere near as loud or rich, despite costing almost twice as much as the Baby.

Taylors are nice but I'm stuck on Martins myself. However, I haven't bought a new one in a very long time. I use to play live and when it came down to it, you never play a expensive ear-blowing guitar at a gig for risk of damage or being stolen. So I always stick to my bang-for-the-buck Fender.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 12, 2009, 10:26:45 AM
I thought the standard tuning for metal was standard Eb.  Van Halen, G&R, etc.  Thrash is what loves the drop D.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Famine on April 12, 2009, 11:05:45 AM
I thought the standard tuning for metal was standard Eb.  Van Halen, G&R, etc.  Thrash is what loves the drop D.

Depends on what you consider metal. Lot of kids today just consider metal tuning as D and C. Then you have the 7-String tunings like B and A. I've also seen some sick 8 string playing but no clue what tunings they are using. Mostly, there is a lot of blues/jazz being mixed up in todays metalcore/hardcore scenes that I've seen where people are going beyond dropped tuning to spice it up with some sick jazz or blues tunes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 12, 2009, 11:09:50 AM
99% of players I've seen on a 7 string still haven't mastered a 6 string... same could be said for people playing 5 and 6 string basses.  Call me a purist, but I prefer music player with the classic rock instruments.  I hate synthesizers and drum machines too and don't even get me started on the overuse of vocal enhancers and harmonizers. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Famine on April 12, 2009, 11:14:18 AM
99% of players I've seen on a 7 string still haven't mastered a 6 string... same could be said for people playing 5 and 6 string basses.  Call me a purist, but I prefer music player with the classic rock instruments.  I hate synthesizers and drum machines too and don't even get me started on the overuse of vocal enhancers and harmonizers. 

Well, there is a lot of classic rock, hard rock, and metal out there. Can't hurt to think outside the box sometimes. You can do that playing the same old 6-string tech or you can maybe branch out and explore new sounds like the 7-string, 8-string, or even synths or drum machines.

I've seen very few local bands using 7-strings but the ones that did were pretty insane with their style. They played weird tunings and did crazy things with synths in their music and I couldn't really see this as a bad thing for trying to explore something different than what was already being mimiced 10 times over. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 12, 2009, 11:18:49 AM
Well, there is a lot of classic rock, hard rock, and metal out there. Can't hurt to think outside the box sometimes. You can do that playing the same old 6-string tech or you can maybe branch out and explore new sounds like the 7-string, 8-string, or even synths or drum machines.

I've seen very few local bands using 7-strings but the ones that did were pretty insane with their style. They played weird tunings and did crazy things with synths in their music and I couldn't really see this as a bad thing for trying to explore something different than what was already being mimiced 10 times over. :)

I'd argue that Les Claypool and Vic Wooten do a lot to demonstrate innovation without having to resort to more strings.  I guess it's just a taste thing.  I am a fan of Dream Theater which uses new tech to expand things, so I definately get where you're coming from. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Famine on April 12, 2009, 11:24:59 AM
Speaking on 7-strings, I bought one awhile back that was merely because I never seen one from the brand. It was a 7-string Fender Bullet. It was a poorly made store brand guitar that I guess they made to see if anyone had interest in buying 7-strings at the time. I don't think they make 7-strings any more (going to google this) but it was sure funny to have a 7-string Fender that no one had seen before. I ended up giving it away because I struggle playing something so huge and so weird after playing 6-string for so long. :D

Edit: Totally wrong, it was a Squier Stratocaster VII (same company anyways). Don't know why I was thinking it was a bullet or a Fender. Memory starting to fade away.

(http://i3.tinypic.com/8aokdix.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 12, 2009, 11:34:00 AM
I thought the standard tuning for metal was standard Eb.  Van Halen, G&R, etc.  Thrash is what loves the drop D.

Depends on what you consider metal. Lot of kids today just consider metal tuning as D and C. Then you have the 7-String tunings like B and A. I've also seen some sick 8 string playing but no clue what tunings they are using. Mostly, there is a lot of blues/jazz being mixed up in todays metalcore/hardcore scenes that I've seen where people are going beyond dropped tuning to spice it up with some sick jazz or blues tunes.

Yeah I'd say it's rare to find metal players in Eb nowadays. ala Metallica type of metal (mostly Eb). Although there were times when Sabbath played in C# even (Children of the Grave, Supernaut), so it's nothing new. Eddie Van Halen actually played Drop D occasionally (Unchained). A lot of trend towards Drop D and Drop C I guess came from the Grunge and Groovemetal bands.. Then the baritones got popular and people were doing Drop B and A and shit with Nu-Metal. As an aside, I like baritones more than 7 strings myself.

Ack.. the history of Metal tunings.  :awesome_for_real:

Anyhow, Crue might have been metal but really Mick Mars is a blues guitarist the more I listen. Reading up on him, I was surprised to see how old he was in comparison to the rest of the band (born in 1951). He's basically a 70's blues-rock guitarist in an 80's hair metal band. His tastes are different from other guitarists in similar bands. He just used these loud fucking amps that aren't common to blues rock.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Famine on April 12, 2009, 11:42:47 AM
Well that's the cycle of music really. Old School versus New School. It's the same with games now as old UO/EQ players versus WoW/LoTRO players (old playing styles versus new playing styles). You will see the common practices and influenced artist fade away from when you were young. What was considered standard for metal or rock then is not considered standard for today. You will start having lower tunings to bring more music out there that's even heavier than before and next (Numetal/Hardcore/Metalcore players for example) we'll see their influences/styles crushed by more electronic styles (synths etc) I think.  :why_so_serious:

/failing today



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 12, 2009, 11:55:03 AM
I like it all.  :grin: Synths included. As long as the underlying song is good, of course. I play a lot of tunings.. although I sold my baritone. As for that (and to get off the subject of metal real quick), what's kind of interesting is a lot of country was playing that stuff before anyone else. Those real deep twangy lines are baritones.

The Cure was playing them too.. A lot of what sounds like bass lines is a bari. Although Lullaby (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEx7pkmFc6s) is a baritone riff, a guitar, and a bassline backing it. Can't hate on that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 13, 2009, 07:30:12 AM
I thought the standard tuning for metal was standard Eb.  Van Halen, G&R, etc.  Thrash is what loves the drop D.
Pfft, thrash was around waaay before the drop-d thing. That was the big nu-metal thing. Maybe other bands have picked up on it, but it does fuck with the elegance of the guitar's tuning (CAGED).

Of course, being in a thrash metal band that started in 84, I am the authority  :awesome_for_real: It was funny playing some metal back in 2001 and being considered 'old school' "Man, you're so /authentic/!" Heh. It was also just as lead playing got popular again, so a lot of cats were playing catch-up and the drop-d kids were hurting because they struggled with chords because they were lazing out with single-finger chords. At least locally, can't speak of national because it's not like I've been plugged into that scene for over a decade now...

Mick is a great guitarist, always has been. I thought it was pretty well known the way he fit into the band as an older, more technical musician lending some credibility to the young kids. But I don't knock Cure too much, I was a huge fan of their first two albums. The guitar tone on Too Young To Fall In Love is just sick, one of my favorite tunes of that era. Wish I had seen them then, I only saw them on the Theater of Pain tour (with Y&T). You know I'm a dreamer.... :oh_i_see:

Going to buy a shure sm57 so I can mike vocals and guitar simultaneously and get back to recording some stuff. Initially just gauging where I am with my sing+play, since a couple years ago I couldn't do it at all and I've got a couple tunes pretty workable. It's really all about song choice, and finding artists who had the same challenges I do with coordinating two (or more) melodies. At this point I'm focusing on Otis Rush, Muddy, Buddy (and Junior), and Hendrix.

Fiancee has also requested more Alice in Chains, she didn't know I had spent time studying Layne and the other day I busted out Got Me Wrong. Was just messing around strumming barre chords and found that pattern, started singing over it, though I mess up the rhythm when I do, heh. After playing through a few other tunes, she said "Was that Alice?" She liked it, so it gets put on the practice list.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 13, 2009, 07:58:29 AM
Of course, being in a thrash metal band that started in 84...

Christ, you're almost as old as I am!  I was playing the bar scene in Mpls from 82 - 85.  I played in metal bands only to make money.  Funny that.  Cover bands are where the good money was.  I'd play in cover bands to make enough to pay for recording time in my originals bands.  Still, I was a bass player.  Proof that I don't know what the hell I'm talking about when it comes to guitar.  I've been dabbling with guitar for 20 years and I still consider myself a hack.  I don't know why, but I just never made the transition from 4 to 6 strings. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 13, 2009, 11:35:00 AM
I've been playing guitar for almost 20 years too, and people just praise me when I pick up the bass. Makes me feel like beating their asses when they say that. Even the females.  :rofl: It's not my instrument, even if it comes more easily. These people - friends included - are just ignorant. They don't recognize genius when they see it.

I guess that last line deserves another laugh emote:  :rofl:


Umm.. But I do harbor some resentment there. I'm not the most orthodox player. Or listener for that matter. And they just don't know what the fuck is going with music. As much as I like some of the conventional kind of stuff people want to hear, I don't end up playing it. I end up doing something else.. mostly just musicians know I'm a better guitar player than a bass player. If that makes sense.

Basically, fuck the haters.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 13, 2009, 12:13:57 PM
Well, yeah. Some people give a shit about the audience. I'm not really in that group, I've always been about enjoying what I'm doing and interacting with the others on stage. If you like it, great. If you don't, have another beer. I got a kick out of the kid who gave me a critique at that open mic, saying how I started off slow but really warmed up. The first song was great, I was in my comfort zone doing all kinds of cool minor jams, riffing off the harp player. The second song was just a bawdy crowd-pleaser where I got to bellow a bit, but the soloing was just a few riffs I stole from Muddy and Buddy.

So I stand behind my feeling that you just have to do what you enjoy and don't sweat what people say.

Just got in my amazon gift card (go go amazon visa rewards), so I got a book of country easy songs (chords+lyrics, fun for sitting out back goofing off), a book of Pink Floyd play-a-long (I'm addicted to that Hal Leonard series, it rocks for the most part) and a blues bass playalong. I'm thinking of upping my open mic stuff to double threat by getting some bass lines down. Then hopefully triple-threat once I get the basement finished up a bit and get my drums set up....they've also got drum playalongs! :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 14, 2009, 08:07:18 AM
So I stand behind my feeling that you just have to do what you enjoy and don't sweat what people say.
Yup.  I never would have actually learned to play "metal" songs from the 1970's and 1980's if I cared what others said.  Playing Hootie & the Blowfish and Bush was where the money and girls were at though!  And that's why I have a day job (in addition to being a shitty player ;-) ).  I sure enjoy my playing though and at the end of the day, that's what really matters.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 14, 2009, 09:22:16 AM
I'll give you that Hootie may have been where the money was at, but the girls are everywhere :) We played underground, keg parties and whatnot, and never went wanting. In fact, I kinda liked the vibe of the word-of-mouth crowd rather than the pay-to-play crowd. A zen kinda thing.

Was hell on the lifestyle, since we didn't really have day jobs. But also pretty awesome, spending all day cliff diving and smoking weed, all night drinking and playing at parties (and making a party if there wasn't one to play at). My theme song used to be Long Haired Country Boy :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 14, 2009, 09:41:36 AM
Speaking of slide tunings again, a low open Db is sick. :D This is a raunchy slide tuning, just right on a big overdrive and some echo. I'm just gonna keep my beater in this.

Well, I found that Mick is playing just a D-D a lot, standard.. not an open tuning.. Even when he slides. Might be cool to learn some Crue songs.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 14, 2009, 10:40:44 AM
I've slacked off on slide playing because I don't like beating up the SG and the beater's pickups sound like garbage with a decent amp. But although I keep the beater in open G for early Muddy stuff (and some Zep, In My Time of Dying), I pretty much want to learn standard tuning slide, late-era Muddy and Warren Haynes. Just makes it more versatile imo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 14, 2009, 10:48:01 AM
Might be cool to learn some Crue songs.
I used to not think the same way, then I realized that a good song is a good song regardless of who does it, and if it's fun to play, that just makes it that much more enjoyable.  I've found all sorts of gems from various bands I never heard of or paid attention to, often on the album as opposed to the radio single that may (or may not) have gotten played to death.

I'll give you that Hootie may have been where the money was at, but the girls are everywhere :)
I can agree to a degree, but every metal show I ever went to in my home town consisted of a roomful of dirty guys and maybe the occasional girlfriend of someone in the place.  Out here in SoCal I went to a show with my Iron Maiden shirt on and I got more thumbs up and conversation started from girls than from guys.  A friend of mine plays in a country band back in the old town and I asked him "I thought you hated country, why do you do it?" and he said "Of course I hate country, but for $600/week the band will play it for a few hours on Fridays and Saturdays."  Kind of hard to argue with that, essentially $75 per night and free drinks at the local bars.  If you're into that, why not?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 22, 2009, 01:23:33 PM
I think I may have found the solution to my old demo master tape dilemma: http://www.sonicraft.com/

That dude has a very nice setup, going to contact him once I jot down the info on the tape. But I'm pretty sure this picture has the exact kind of reel on it that I have:

(http://www.sonicraft.com/images/440Cs_W.jpg)

Hopefully the old metal will ride again!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 22, 2009, 03:50:11 PM
I was a musician in the early 80's.  If noone ever heard my music again, it would be just fine with me.  Metal is a lot more timeless than the stuff I was writing.  I think I need to burn my old demo masters. 

Maybe I'll do that tonight.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 22, 2009, 07:02:02 PM
I've got a reel to reel machine that was a professional quality rack-mount system in its day (my dad bought it in 1977 for $500 or so).  It looks almost identical to the ones you show.  It weighs almost 40lbs and has a sound like none other.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 22, 2009, 08:10:22 PM
Reel still is a great way to record. Tape is ridiculously expensive, that's the problem.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 23, 2009, 07:22:09 AM
I think I need to burn my old demo masters. 
I'm expecting to get a good laugh out of it. It was a total rush job, done live in the studio.

I don't think they do any mixing, so it'll be a straight transfer of the 8 tracks, most likely. I'll have to finally get around to learning Audacity unless I sneak it into work to do it in Garageband.

Even though I haven't seen my old band in years, I plan on tracking them down so I can mail them copies of the masters and a mixdown. What a great opportunity this is, I had griped for years about not having a copy of our one studio gig, and now I hold the masters! I feel it's only right to get copies to the guys, no matter what water has passed under various bridges. I'll probably also give copies to a few old fans I still know in the area, their tapes are probably long gone or worn out by now.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 23, 2009, 07:26:21 AM
I think it sounds like a fun endeavor.  I wonder if you could ever remix those masters to something you like even more? 

My masters were the result of the demo that got us signed.  They were done over the course of 10 days in a Minneapolis studio and cost us a pretty penny to mix.  The sad truth is that they sound horribly dated (like a mix between the Cure and REM).  I listened to the mix on an old tape a few nights ago.  It made me laugh listening to just how high I used to be able to sing back then.  I can't even sqeak that high now. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 23, 2009, 08:52:54 AM
There's probably a ton of bleed, especially in the vocals. But yeah, I hope to mess around with the mix a bit. Could be fun, and maybe drop in a few new parts if I get creative.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on April 23, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
Up the guitar's mids!

Almost surely an 80's metal band had them scooped.  :grin:

Also, make the bass "existent".


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 24, 2009, 06:22:53 AM
My bass was more like 'HOLY FUCK IS THERE A FREIGHT TRAIN IN MY BRAIN'. Though this recording would be before I had dialed my tone in, indeed before I knew what the hell I was doing. Probably six months after I had begun playing bass, still using a pick for some stuff (though I never abandoned the pick for the really fast stuff, to keep definition).

I'm kind of scared to hear my bass parts, since the few tapes I have are from rehearsals where I had my tone dialed in and was up to speed with finger thumping. But moving from lead guitar to bass, yeah, I was all about being present in the mix as an equal player, used to play melodic figures and whatnot.

Our guitarist wasn't a scooper, we had a guy who sat in with us and did that, it always sounded odd.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on April 24, 2009, 08:26:50 AM
I was a musician in the early 80's.  If noone ever heard my music again, it would be just fine with me.  Metal is a lot more timeless than the stuff I was writing.  I think I need to burn my old demo masters. 

I think that instead you should upload each of the individual tracks (guitar, vox, etc) and invite people to remix it. You'll get a contemporary sounding song out of it that way. I'll even do a version heavy with synth and drum machines just for you.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on April 24, 2009, 10:31:45 AM
Quote
I think that instead you should upload each of the individual tracks (guitar, vox, etc) and invite people to remix it.

I was thinking the exact same thing!  Post up the raw tracks in PCM format, and let's see what kind of abomination we can put together.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 03, 2009, 09:54:26 PM
Posted a new tune. Been a while. :)

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/IWillBeThereForYou.mp3

Yes, I know, the bass especially.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 04, 2009, 06:52:20 AM
I was thinking the exact same thing!  Post up the raw tracks in PCM format, and let's see what kind of abomination we can put together.

You guys and your fancy technology talk frightens and amazes me.  I fould some old reel master tapes and some cassette copies this weekend. 

Dated would be the nicest thing I could say about the music.  I swear the only reason we got signed was because we were popular in the Minneapolis market when some other, more talented bands, were also popular here. 

On a side not: interesting stuff Raph.  I really need to learn to record like that. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2009, 08:39:33 AM
Piano just classes up any tune imo, wish I could play.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 04, 2009, 10:18:29 AM
Nebu, what are the aspects of recording you don't feel comfortable with? I am no expert, not by a loooooong stretch.

I have to admit, after the fourth take on recording the bass, I thought about just asking one of you guys to record the part. ;)

You guys always give me more comments/feedback on the recording than on the music. :)

Here's some stuff that I got asked on the blog about how I recorded it:

    What did you use to record?

I double-miked the acoustic guitar with an ATM41HE pointed at the 12th fret from around 4 inches away, and an AT4033a/SM around 18 inches away, both with pop filters on.

The vocals are on the ATM41HE. The “ooohs” in the backing on the bridge are run through a Digitech Vocalist Live 4 to get automatic harmonies.

From there it goes into a Tascam 4 track I use as a mixer, then into Acid Pro 7.

The clarinet and piano parts are played live on a Yamaha P70, with VSTs.

    Which axes did you use?

This is on the Blueridge. The bass is a Washburn.

    How many tracks?

Acoustic guitar: added a small bit of reverb.
Lead vocal. Close to dry.
Bass.
Backing vocal is a doubled stereo track panned hard left and hard right.
Piano.
Clarinets.

    Are you playing and singing at the same time?

No, actually. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. I get better timing but worse vocals when I do. And this song was kind of hard to sing (I have a bit of sinus congestion right now, hitting that high note was hard). This was the only vocal take, whereas I had to do the guitar a couple of times. There a little inversion on the picking pattern, 2nd chord in the verse, that I kept messing up. :)

    Yeah, a little more bass and a melodic bass line, but that’s a taste call and you should do what works for yours, not mine.

I did the bass like four times, and at first I thought I needed to make it move more, especially as the song built. Then the movement started to show up more in the piano, and now I think I need to background it more — there’s places, specially as the final repeated verse starts, where you can hear the bass bumping along and it just doesn’t seem to need to.

The thing that is missing for sure is that the final verse is supposed to have harmonized backing vocals repeating the refrain under all of that, and that audio clip got corrupted in one of the crashes. I had already gone and adjusted the mic levels, so it was more work than i wanted to do just then to recreate them…


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2009, 10:49:20 AM
You guys always give me more comments/feedback on the recording than on the music. :)
Be careful what you wish for :) I'm not a fan of the genre, though your tunes are usually nice to listen to. It's tough building anything around a piano part, it's like the 'younger' blues guys said about the old timers when blues was electrifying; the acoustic guys were basically one-man bands, playing all the parts and the kids would say "They don't leave no place to play nothin on it!"

Nebu, my recording setup is far simpler, because I am. I have a MR8HD which purports to be an 8 track, but is really a 4 track for most purposes. I can bounce to 5/6 and 7/8 is for stereo mixdowns.

I have two ways of recording: with a backing track or "solo". Solo I just start with one track and build it up. So for track 1 I'd usually lay down a rhythm guitar piece. Then on track two I'd put bass, then lay vocals on 3 and put a lead on 4.

For a backing track, I'll put the backer on 4 or maybe bounce it to 5 or 6. Then layer on the pieces similar to the above. If it's a Hal Leonard Play-along, I'll leave the backer on. If it's just an album track, I'll cut it out after laying the rhythm parts down so I can sing and solo over my own parts.

Either way, I then bounce it to a stereo track after doing minimal mixing (live while bouncing). Send that to the pc via USB and that's about it. At some point I need to get audacity or acid or something and actually mix on the pc where I can actually spend some time tweaking things. I don't really do anything that is worth bothering with all that kind of stuff, imo. Would really love to get a macbook pro and go nuts, but $$$

I just got another mic (shure sm57 for guitar, sm58 for vox) so I can sing and play simultaneously. At first mostly going to use it for critical listening, finding out where the worst spots are in my simultaneous performance. I haven't really been doing disciplined practice lately, so it was pretty messy saturday when I was able to get in 2 hours straight. Wind Cries Mary actually made the wind cry imo.

Still need to come up with a solution for drums without blowing a lot of money. At least a click track or a drum machine, though I dislike them and find it hard to spend money on such a thing. Eventually I'll have my drums set up in the basement (seems dry enough now, need to build a riser though) and I'll end up putting live drums on my tracks...once I get back up to speed with that, anyway.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 04, 2009, 10:50:39 AM
I have two exeprience levels with recording:

1) on a fostex 4 track cassette recorder (circa 1984)

2) In a studio with a bajillion dollars worth of gear I don't understand.

I'd like to be able to record at least 8 tracks at home including a volcal harmonizer, a keyboard/synth, and a drum machine.  I may also buy an amp modeller for my guitar or anything else that will help hide how terrible my playing is.  

I'm guessing that I could run this through my desktop, but I don't even know where to begin with that.  I assumed I'd just buy a small mixing board and just direct box everything to it, but technology has gone well beyond this I'm sure.  

EDIT: Thanks Sky, you posted as I hit my reply.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 04, 2009, 10:52:47 AM
Quote from: Raph
I did the bass like four times, and at first I thought I needed to make it move more, especially as the song built.

In tunes without drums it's especially challenging to make a good bass line.  Good bass lines should always interplay with the kick drum and low toms, and when you don't have drums you almost have to make up a drum part yourself (or that's how you should be thinking about it).

Raph, in that tune you have natural accents on your rhythm guitar track which make great hook points for a bass line.  The tune sounds like it is in 8/4, but you are accenting in a 3/4 pattern, creating a syncopation.  Try doing a bass line in an opposing 3/4 and you'll get the movement you are looking for.

Quote from: Sky
Still need to come up with a solution for drums without blowing a lot of money.

Would you entertain stepping up to a DAW?  If so, there's a billion sampled drum libraries that are amazing.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2009, 11:23:44 AM
Nebs, links to the Fostex I mentioned (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR8HD-8Track-Digital-Recorder-with-40GB-Hard-Drive?sku=240341). There's a 16 track version, but it's still only 4 live tracks.

Miguel, I've considered it (assuming just the software and importing individual tracks from the multitracker). But I have a low tolerance for fucking around with technology, it's why I prefer my Fulldrive2 over my Boss GT-6.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 04, 2009, 11:26:23 AM
I think I posted about my setup before... it really is not all that complicated.

I run microphones, line ins, whatever, into my 4 track. I use that as a mixer, basically. It lets me set relative levels for the instrument mic versus the vocal mic, set some EQ, that sort of thing. It also lets me adjust the signal so that I don't clip there. I run drum machine, vocal harmonizer, and two offboard rack units I never use (compressor/limiter & reverb) into there. Sometimes I run the amp's out to there. Sometimes I run the guitars direct to there. All depends on the sound you want.

From there I connect to my soundcard. I have an old Audigy 2, but there's a zillion cards out there that would work. Back when, you had to have a card with regular audio inputs to get quality, but these days you can use USB pretty easily. I just run from the monitor out to the inputs. The end, very straightforward.

Then your audio software can pick it up from there. Audacity will do fine, it's not as slick as the higher-end DAWs ("digital audio workstation"). Hook it all up, put on headphones, turn off your speakers, and play something. Watch the meters to make sure you aren't too quiet or too loud. Try recording something loud, something soft, adjust mic positions and look for the tone you want. Then record.

Then go back to overdub, which is just rinse, repeat. You can use the DAW to mute some of the tracks, punch in, loop things, all that. It should feel mostly like using a computerized 4 track, honestly.

You can mix some as you go, or do it all at the end. You don't need to bounce anything, and your track capacity is limited only by RAM and disk space.

MIDI adds some extra requirements. You need a MIDI interface, and VSTs (digital virtual instruments) to play back the MIDI. But once you get it hooked up, in the simplest form you can just play the keyboard and it comes into the DAW basically as another track of whatever instrument it is.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 04, 2009, 11:31:26 AM
Be careful what you wish for :) I'm not a fan of the genre, though your tunes are usually nice to listen to. It's tough building anything around a piano part, it's like the 'younger' blues guys said about the old timers when blues was electrifying; the acoustic guys were basically one-man bands, playing all the parts and the kids would say "They don't leave no place to play nothin on it!"

This tune was actually born on the guitar, not the piano... :) I do have a habit of filling up space, because I play solo just about always, so I know exactly what you mean.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 04, 2009, 11:35:24 AM
Nebs, links to the Fostex I mentioned (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR8HD-8Track-Digital-Recorder-with-40GB-Hard-Drive?sku=240341). There's a 16 track version, but it's still only 4 live tracks.

Only $299?  Damn, things have changed. 

I have a spare bedroom in my house that I was planning to soundproof.  It has high ceilings for a nice echo, so I may just start with this and build something.  I've been hesitant to start messing with home recording because I know it will fast become a financial money sink, but with no MMOs worth playing, I think this is a perfect time.  Now I'm starting to regret having gotten rid of much of my old gear... hindsight and all that.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2009, 12:04:18 PM
The 16 track version is only $50 more (MR16HD), I'd probably go that way if I were buying it today. I think I paid $250 on sale for the MR8HD.

I think one of my main dislikes of the DAW setup is the lack of physical interface, which is why (before I got weighed down with mortgage) I was considering the Digi002. Programmable motorized faders I could use traditionally or program with the Pro Tools software. Also, skills that would translate directly to modern studios. But....$$$$
in the simplest form you can just play the keyboard and it comes into the DAW basically as another track of whatever instrument it is.
Assuming you know how to play keyboard :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 04, 2009, 12:06:29 PM
You don't need that much to get started.  I wouldn't record through a mixer, as most of the audio input devices (that have more than 1 stereo input, that is) have hardware mixers you can control in software.

If you don't mind single tracking, you only need an interface with one stereo input/microphone preamp.  If you want to record multiple inputs simultaneously, then adjust to taste.  MAudio and Presonus make some good units for less than a few hundred bucks.

If you are only tracking, and you are using a Mac, Garageband will do most of what you want for free.  For PC, a good option is Reaper, which you can get for $50.

If you want to record amps, acoustic guitars, singing, etc, you can't go wrong with an SM-57 and SM-58 pair.  The thing about the Shure dynamic mikes though is they need good volume to get a good sound, so if you are recording delicate instruments then a large diaphragm condenser may be better than a '57.

Also, someone recently turned me on to Naiant (http://www.naiant.com) microphones.  You can get a matched pair for $40 and they sound great based on the reviews I have read.  If you have a good sounding room it's had to beat a stereo pair of omni's, but you would need two mic preamps to take advantage of them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 04, 2009, 12:22:13 PM
Miguel: The only reason I record through the mixer is because I mess around with multiple signals for the guitar. If you are happy with a direct sound, you definitely don't need one. For recording acoustic, though, I have had much better results in the end by having my choice of signals to mix. And my audio setup has limited inputs.

I tend to think of the Shure mics as better for live sound than recording, but they are certainly decent. Diaphragm condensers of course, you have to be careful not to drop!

Sky: quite a lot of the DAWs do hardware fader integration now. You're more likely to end up with that challenge on the controller side than the software.

You don't need to know how to play the keyboard, honestly. You can go into step recording mode, and go a note at a time! And these days, so many keyboards & VSTs do automatic arpeggiation, etc, that you can totally fake it. :P

Nebu, that song was recorded in a spare bedroom where one wall is sliding glass mirror closet doors. Just about worse case for bounceback. :P Start with the basics, improve the room second, is my advice.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 04, 2009, 12:23:48 PM
If you want to record amps, acoustic guitars, singing, etc, you can't go wrong with an SM-57 and SM-58 pair.  The thing about the Shure dynamic mikes though is they need good volume to get a good sound, so if you are recording delicate instruments then a large diaphragm condenser may be better than a '57.

I have both.  Dumb question: If I don't have a mixing board is there a way to directly connect the mics into the thing Sky is talking about or do I need some type of 1/4" converter like a direct box for each channel.  

To be honest, the only reason that I'd ever record more than one channel at a time were if I wanted to add a live drum track.  Since my kit skills suck, I may opt to go with a drum machine instead.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 04, 2009, 12:33:57 PM
Nebu: It depends how many inputs your sound hardware has. You can get them anywhere from "one" to "lots, of all sorts." You can get them with XLRs, with 1/4", with RCA, with a mix... you get the idea. And you can get it with the inputs on a breakout box, or not, or even just as a wierd octopus. The Audigy 2 Ex I have has a small mix -- basically, one set of inputs per type, basically, on a breakout box. It is ancient, but that is why it is cheap. :) There's much better stuff out there now.

Push comes to shove, you can just daisy chain converters to get to what you want. XLR to 1/4" to mini-RCA will get a decent mic into a laptop. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2009, 12:39:15 PM
Nebu, my unit has XLR with phantom power for all 4 live channels, as well as 1/4" inputs with gain for DI. So you could do either/or XLR/1/4". I can then mix down on the unit or send the individual tracks to the computer via usb to mess around with in software. It's really a pretty cool device for someone like me who doesn't want to mess around with stuff much.

I'll have to look into some software stuff. The hardware integrations sounds $$$. Have I mentioned complexity and cost are my banes? I blew the last of my music budget on the sm57 and that money had been sitting on my dresser for over a year. No more music budget.  :oh_i_see:

Also, did step recording in music school  :uhrr: No likey. No likey faking it, either.

Have I mentioned I'm also curmudgeonly?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 04, 2009, 02:18:03 PM
I guess I should have qualified that:  there's nothing wrong with recording through a mixer, especially if you are tracking multiple separate mixes at once.  If the mixer is good that helps a ton.  Crappy mixers can be a real headache.

However if you are only recording one or two mics, it's better to not use a mixer, as mixers have a ton of internal busses before you get to the recording outputs (e.g. input trims, master bus sends, returns, etc).  If you aren't side-chaining, mixing effects live, etc, it's much better to do the whole 'mic+gain+into the computer', as you'll get a much better sound with less in-between the source and your track on your DAW.  This can be especially apparent when you get into mixing +4db and -10db equipment into the same setup, unbalancing of balanced sources, etc.

If your mixer has individual side-chain outputs for the preamps, that also works well, since side-chain sends are typically pre-fader, pre-eq, etc.  But you need to have as many inputs on your DAW as mic's you are recording, which can be a problem.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 04, 2009, 02:59:33 PM
Yeah. I don't have that many inputs, hence why I use the mixer. :) It's a limitation on my hardware, actually, not the DAW itself. The soundcard can handle multiple inputs just fine, but I only have so many jacks of each sort.

Ideally, I would move to an interface with multiple XLR and 1/4" jacks, and maybe a separate MIDI interface with multiple jacks there as well. Then I could run all the audio signals to the one interface, and all the MIDI to the other. Right now, I use the Alesis SR-16 as an audio device rather than a MIDI one for example, because I don't have enough MIDI capacity, but I can handle a bunch of audio inputs into the mixer.

Edit: oops, everywhere I said Audigy 2, please replace with Audigy Platinum eX. Like I said, OLD.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 05, 2009, 06:00:22 AM
Computers aren't real friendly to creativity imo. I like just hitting power, record, and recording an idea. Maybe if I spent more time recording longer sessions it might be a better deal.

Also, I loved the sound my band used to get taping rehearsals through a boom box, I love a hot messy mix (and bassy I've been told). I've mentioned before how that got me in 'trouble' in school. So I may not be the best person to recommend recording techniques, unless you dig the rebel underground sound.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on May 05, 2009, 09:08:20 AM
Nebs, links to the Fostex I mentioned (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR8HD-8Track-Digital-Recorder-with-40GB-Hard-Drive?sku=240341). There's a 16 track version, but it's still only 4 live tracks.

Only $299?  Damn, things have changed. 

I have a spare bedroom in my house that I was planning to soundproof.  It has high ceilings for a nice echo, so I may just start with this and build something.  I've been hesitant to start messing with home recording because I know it will fast become a financial money sink, but with no MMOs worth playing, I think this is a perfect time.  Now I'm starting to regret having gotten rid of much of my old gear... hindsight and all that.

Much of your old recording gear would probably be a nuisance compared to modern equipment. The Fostex above is ideal for practice & demo work if you just want something standalone to record ideas. You know what it's the modern equivalent of. If you want as much control as the pros, you should think about a couple of grand of Pro Tools gear - something like this (http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&navid=464&ref=003r+-p) fits the home studio bill. Along with a control deck (the modern MIDI enabled mixing deck that can control software settings in computer editors) and some digital audio workstation software, you can build a system that will outperform the multi-million dollar studios you recorded in in the 80s for what is insanely cheap by comparison. Ten grand buys you everything you need to make professional albums apart from the CD pressing plant, but you've probably already got the computer investment taken care of. Apart from the fact that its quality stuff that's had all the kinks beaten out of it over the years, the big sell for Pro Tools is that its what most of the big studios use, so even if you use a cheap $300 system such as this (http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&navid=114&itemid=4962), you can open the finished projects in the $250,000 Pro Tools HD based systems that EMI studios use. In fact, if you just want to fiddle, the Mbox 2 and a laptop is a great portable system that can go anywhere your instrument/mic can. I know musicians who go on tour with a MacBook Pro and one of the Mbox systems just so that they can compose while on the tour bus. There's a lot less downtime for a touring musician these days.  :-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 05, 2009, 11:13:11 AM
Yeah, a digi003 or mbox2/mbp would be perfect. It would also run you close to 3 grand, either way :) Maybe the only purchase I regret not making before buying a house.

Now excuse me while I cough up a kidney to find $1000 for repairing my chimneys.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 05, 2009, 11:14:56 AM
All I want is something that I can dabble with but eventually use to create complete arrangements.  I play many instruments and would ideally enjoy making full scale works while playing everything myself.  If I can do that on a portable 8 track, then that works fine. I don't mind ping-ponging, but sometimes you need everything separate for the final mix.  

Maybe I need to look at something PC driven?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 05, 2009, 11:41:06 AM
Quote from: Nebu
Maybe I need to look at something PC driven?

Let us know a few things:

1) What is the budget?
2) PC only? Mac?
3) How many inputs do you want to be able to record simultaneously?
4) What kind of sources do you want to be able to record simultaneously?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 05, 2009, 12:55:22 PM
All I want is something that I can dabble with but eventually use to create complete arrangements.  I play many instruments and would ideally enjoy making full scale works while playing everything myself.  If I can do that on a portable 8 track, then that works fine. I don't mind ping-ponging, but sometimes you need everything separate for the final mix.  

Maybe I need to look at something PC driven?
I'm just going to go ahead and make assumptions ;) Unless you've got a big budget... The reason I went with the unit I did is because I can have the ease of quick recording without dicking around with the computer, but then I can send those tracks to the PC and work with them in something like Audacity or Acid later (or garageband on the mac). Unless you outgrow the 4 inputs simultaneously, it's a pretty decent compromise, especially with the 16 track unit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 05, 2009, 01:22:32 PM
1) What is the budget?

I want bang for buck.  If that costs money, I'll find it.

2) PC only? Mac?

PC only.

3) How many inputs do you want to be able to record simultaneously?

At most 2.  I'd either record the instrument directly or with two live mics.  I'd record vocals myself or with a friend singing harmony. 

4) What kind of sources do you want to be able to record simultaneously?

Instruments, microphones, or both.  Brass, strings, and woodwinds would need to be miced.  I would love to have 4 inputs for live drum tracks, but I can do that with two live mics in a pinch.  My skills are such that I'd stick with a drum machine the majority of the time.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 06, 2009, 06:06:20 AM
Ah, drum mics. Forgot I'm going to need two more mics for snare and kick. D'oh.

Well, after a shitload of practice, anyway. Watching that funk drummer lesson in another thread reeeally has me thinking about building a drum riser. Somebody subscribe to me, at least you'd get something for something :) Even if it would just be shitty blues rock recordings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 06, 2009, 10:18:16 AM
...requirements...

Ok that is a good place to start.

So what you really need are:

1) The PC (assuming you already have this)
2) An interface

There are a ton of two+ channel interfaces out there.  It sounds like you'll need at least two preamps on it as well.

I would suggest one of these:
MAudio Fast Track Pro USB (http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/FastTrackPro.html) - 2 mic pre's or instrument inputs, MIDI, SPDIF, headphone monitor outs, balanced and unbalanced outputs, just about everything you need.  It is class compliant, so if you are only recording 16bit/48KHz you don't even need drivers.  It comes with Ableton Live Lite for basic recording needs. About $200 bucks online.

Digidesign MBox 2 USB (http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&navid=29&itemid=4893) - 2 mic pre's or instrument inputs, MIDI, SDPIF.  Basically the same features as the MAudio unit, but also comes with Protools LE.  About $450 online.

3) Recording SW

If you go with the MAudio unit, you can buy ProTools M-Powered, which is basically the same as Protools LE (but works with MAudio HW).  Protools M-Powered is about $250, so the cost of the two packages above is about the same.  Other good choices are Steinburg's Cubase and Cakewalk's SONAR.

Going to higher price points gets you more inputs, (hopefully) better mic pre's, and wordclock inputs/outputs.  Pretty much all of the interfaces can record at 24 bit (and I would recommend always recording in 24 bit) and at higher-than-redbook-cd sampling rates, if you so desire.

The nice thing about the setup(s) above is that as you expand your recording palette, you can start bringing in external devices, like discrete mic pre's, DI boxes, external preamps for instruments, etc, and still get full use of the great A/D convertors in the MAudio/Digidesign input boxes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on May 06, 2009, 10:22:26 AM
All I want is something that I can dabble with but eventually use to create complete arrangements.  I play many instruments and would ideally enjoy making full scale works while playing everything myself.  If I can do that on a portable 8 track, then that works fine. I don't mind ping-ponging, but sometimes you need everything separate for the final mix.  

Maybe I need to look at something PC driven?

I would go for the Mbox 2 at $500 (http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=29&itemid=4893) for a home PC system. You've already got the PC, so the full hardware and software solution will cost you $500. That gives you a computer recording system that can go up to 96 (48 stereo) tracks. You'll only have two analog inputs and 16 MIDI channels, but since you're planning to play everything yourself and edit, that will work just fine.

It will afford you much more versatility and capability for $200 more than a discounted Fostek portastudio thing. The Fostek is good for something cheap and portable that you can take to band practices, although again I'd be after the $330 Mbox unit so I could have all the goodies on a laptop instead.

Go look through the bumpf on the Pro Tools software (http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=507&langid=100&itemid=35911) and all the plugins you can get for a ProTools LE based DAW (http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=119&langid=100&mkt=LE) and then tell me you don't want that power for $500. I personally think its worth it for the score editor alone.   :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 06, 2009, 06:21:04 PM
I wanted to thank everyone for the input.  I'm heading to Minneapolis, Chicago, and St. Louis over the next week and will likely use this as an excuse to hit some music stores along the way.  Once I get something setup, I'll probably mess around with a couple of covers before doing some original material.  If I feel brave, I may even post something.

I appreciate the help.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 07, 2009, 08:13:55 AM
So I heard back from the studio that does analog to digital transfers. $250+25 to get the tape back. Going to have to wait, as I'm broke. I'm pretty excited to hear that old crap...but that's almost what it cost to record it in the first place!

He said they use a broadcast wav file, I didn't know there were different kinds of wav. They also offer aiff, but I think I'm better off with wav, right?

The other thing is sample rate, I hadn't thought of that. They offer 44.1, 48, 88.2 or 96kHz. I want the highest, right?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 07, 2009, 10:26:13 AM
He said they use a broadcast wav file, I didn't know there were different kinds of wav. They also offer aiff, but I think I'm better off with wav, right?

The other thing is sample rate, I hadn't thought of that. They offer 44.1, 48, 88.2 or 96kHz. I want the highest, right?

Braodcast WAV is regular WAV with some metadata extensions.  Most players will ignore them.

AIFF is just Mac's version of uncompressed PCM encoding.  Mac's can play either format, not sure about Windows support for AIFF...probably just a function of the particular player.

I would get the highest sample rate:  you can always down-sample to CD standard if you want to make discs.

Did they offer you a bit depth option?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 07, 2009, 11:11:22 AM
He seems very receptive toward making the best transfer and having it just the way I want it, within his studio's limits, of course. So I'll ask. What would be good to go for with that, I use 192 VBR for my AAC stuff, I imagine I'd want something higher. 256? More? Or is bit depth different than rate? Damn computers!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on May 07, 2009, 03:00:40 PM
Bit depth is not the same as bit rate. Bit depth is the number of bits allocated to store a single sample. For a compact disk, the sample rate is 44,100 hertz, so there are 44,100 samples per second. The bit depth of CD is 16 bits. Digital masters will probably use 24 bit samples at 96,000 samples per second which is common on A-DAT hardware. If you want make a digital archive of an analog source, you want the fastest sample rate and the greatest bit depth you can 'affordably' get, and in most studios, that means 96kHz and 24 bit. The most modern, high-end studios can offer 192kHz but frankly you're doing crazy stuff with inaudible frequencies if you need to sample that fast.

Lossy algorithms such as MP3 and AAC are not comparable technology. Don't get confused with terms used to describe their behaviour.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 07, 2009, 04:37:26 PM
Sky, if you want to think about linear PCM in terms of 'bit rate', it's pretty easy:

Bit Rate = Bit Depth * Sample Frequency

So Red Book CD is 16 bits * 44.1k Samples/Sec = 705 kbps

24 bit * 96k = 2,304 kbps

Also note that linear PCM would be considered a type of CBR encoding.

But like Righ says, gets the highest bit depth and sampling rate you can get without going crazy with file sizes and cost.  A 24/96, you are looking at about 288 KBytes per second of audio.  So an hour's worth of material will be almost 17GB of data...and that's PER TRACK!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 07, 2009, 04:50:56 PM
Correction...cause math is hard!

CD 16/44.1 = 310 MB per hour per track
24/96 = 1 GB per hour per track
24/192 = 2 GB per hour per track


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 08, 2009, 06:18:02 AM
Rereading the email, he does mention the wavs are 24 bit. So it would be 24/96 WAV.

Going to have to put it off for a while ($1k chimney repair), maybe contact the studio I got my master from and see if the owner wants to go in on any more transfers, since half the cost is setup for the studio maybe I can split it with him.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 13, 2009, 08:44:34 AM
Summer time, out with EQ2, in with guitar. I get a lot more focused (well, as much as I can manage) during the summer. It's odd to be able to play some cools songs, but not remember them, heh. Finally got back to working on Jessica, got it down up to the piano break. Learn the overall form and plug the riffs in, since it's mostly repeats of the top I know. Then it's a good platform for some major scale improv, aka kryptonite.

Going to work through my repertoire list and polish up some stuff.

Also a cool link:

http://www.stewmac.com/freeinfo/String_action_and_setup/a-famoussetups.html


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2009, 06:46:59 AM
ZOMG major scale soloing is difficult. Still working on the improv sections of Jessica, focusing more on playing correct scales that the musicality is suffering. It's one of those odd things about my playing, in a minor key I can just focus on the melody of what I'm playing because all the scales are imprinted in some section of my brain. So going back to the drawing board to learn the major stuff, with all the different sweet bendy spots and go-to licks just sucks! Cry more, newb, I guess.

Watched some of The Song Remains the Same last night, jammed along with the mighty Page. Took his jam section from the middle of Dazed and Confused, basically Em to C with a little walking bass riff; expanded that out to work on fretboard knowledge, playing it all over the place using different fingerings and positions. Then tried voicing the walking bass line in different parts of the chord depending on how I was fingering it. Some real fun stuff, and basically the way Pagey was doing it anyway.

Love watching him live, it always makes me want to get my shit together. He's just so goddamned knowledgable across the board, and a very creative and active imagination. Watching him play a song across several recordings is a good lesson in improvisation. The video stuff is funny, too, because I love watching JPJ and Bonham working behind Page, they have pretty amazing stage communication.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 26, 2009, 06:48:52 AM
Page and Jones had an amazing understanding of the fretboard.  Every time I watch them play live I learn something new.  I wish they had shown more footage of Jones... the guy is so underrated. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2009, 08:47:30 AM
There's one section, maybe in that break for Dazed and Confused, where Page is just jamming, leading into the jam section. JPJ and Bonham are trying to figure out when to come in and they keep going "nope.....nope...." and laughing. Probably my favorite part of the movie. I wish they'd show how Page was playing the Rain Song on there, I'm pretty sure he's playing it differently than the way I learned it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 26, 2009, 09:58:12 AM
Not too change the subject (too much)...especially since there is no 'Bass Thread':

I've been wanting a Steinberger bass since I first saw Geddy Lee play one.  I finally got the opportunity to play one (an XL from the late 80's I believe), and I really liked it.  I'm not sure if it is the same scale length as a normal bass (various web sites have it at 34", which I believe is standard for 4 string basses), but the strings definitely felt much less 'flabby' than my other basses (which are an old Peavey, a 5 string fretless Carvin B5, and a Ibanez SRX505).  The tone was tight and consistent up and down the fretboard.  I really like the '0th' fret idea as well.

I really like aggressive tones:  the Ibanez comes fairly close, but can be fiddly with intonation and setup.  It's also HUGE and HEAVY.  The Carvin plays nice, but I don't have a need for fretless anymore since I stopped playing in a Jazz group.  The Peavey is garbage, but is good for a beater.

I'm thinking of selling off these three bases, and investing in a headless bass.  The original Steinbergers are going for the multi-thousand dollar level, so are way out of my price range.  The new Steinberger Synapses can be had for around a grand, but they have changed the shape and the electronics and I haven't been able to locate any sound demos.  I have found some headless copies made by Hohner, but they are all wood, so I don't know how their sound compares.

Any chance anyone has tried one of the Hohner's?  Apparently they are made in the Cort factory in Korea.  They sell for about $450-$500, are all maple (neck through) and play well.  One downside is the electronics are apparently pretty crappy, but I have installed many pickup and on-board preamps in my day so it doesn't scare me to much.  I'm mostly worried about build quality of Cort/Hohner, and if a non-graphite instrument would play in a similar fashion.  Unfortunately nobody around here carries any of them, so I would be buying sight-unseen.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 26, 2009, 10:04:20 AM
I played a Cort headless in the 80's and found it to be a very fast and playable instrument.  Unfortunately, while playable, it isn't much for tone.  They are gimic basses and I'd never use one for anything but live work.  In the studio I'll still take a rick, fender, or G&L.  I love my 70's fender jazz. It's not as fast on the fretboard, but it's got such a great tone that it's irreplaceable. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2009, 11:40:29 AM
There is a bass thread...this one! It's a bass guitar!

Remember, Nebs and I are bass players, though I've reconverted back to mostly guitar these days. I've never played a headless bass, though. I loved my beater Peavey (back when everything I had was beater)! One of the local blues guys always plays a fretless bass with some kind of plastic strings, it's fun to play but kind of odd.

I would never buy an instrument without playing it first, though. Way too much variation in factory quality. Most SGs I play are crap, but my 61RI is the best guitar I've ever played.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 27, 2009, 01:43:01 AM
anyone heard the recent Frusciante stuff. the synthed out solo at the end is [splendid]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRp1G8Po3tM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRp1G8Po3tM)



i know he's part of a trendy hit n miss band, but i love the guy. he's kept that band alive (twice!), and his own stuff is great.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 27, 2009, 06:03:22 AM
The song itself is pretty forgettable, but the solo is very nice. I think he kinda overdoes the effects through the last half of it, though. Main riff sounds very Pepper-y. But I've been a Pepper fan since a loooooong time ago and John has always been my favorite guitarist with them. Too bad he decided to take those years off and do heroin, since Navarro was probably their worst period.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 27, 2009, 06:53:45 AM
He uses that effect a lot it seems. It's quite cool. There's this vid (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE3dUUj4_4Q) about Dani California, showing his synth.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on May 27, 2009, 06:56:55 AM
Quote
I would never buy an instrument without playing it first, though

I tend to agree.  I wish someone around here carried them in the store!

I wish I could describe the sensation of playing the original graphite instrument.  A lot of basses (to me), have strings that I could only describe as flabby.  Meaning that if you take the string, and bend it with your finger (right around the point in-between the neck and bridge pickups), it gives considerably before releasing and sounding.  Like if you took a rubber band, and just barely stretched it tight, and tried to pluck it, it would give and give and never snap back to the initial position until it was stretched significantly.  The Steinberger bass seemed to have much higher string tension, which made it easier (for me) to pluck quickly.

Based on reading I have done, string tension is a function of scale length and gauge of string:  e.g., the longer the scale length, the more the string tension for a fixed gauge of string tuned to a fixed pitch.  Also, the thicker the string, the more tension at a given pitch and length.  The problem is a) scale lengths are pretty much fixed, and b) heavy gauge strings are darker and have progressively shittier tone (to my ears).

I wonder if a lot of the apparent tension comes from the essentially completely rigid fretboard and body?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 27, 2009, 07:54:35 AM
I always liked having that range of pliability, though. It lends itself to different tones, and I had really worked the bass tones since I just played clean into an amp. For faster stuff, I would stiffen my fingers a bit (aping Steve Harris) and play right above the bridge where the strings were almost immobile, but you sacrifice some of the tone for that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on May 28, 2009, 11:41:23 PM
If anybody feels like single-handedly kick-starting the economy:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150346408570&ssPageName=ADME:B:EF:US:1123

Edit: video of the guitar being played (zip to 5 mins in for the real fun), actually the buy it now price is a bargain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LB6WNzwQWU


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 29, 2009, 03:10:06 AM
original LP PAF pickups sell for 10000 each. You could kickstart the economy even with just that.


seriously though, it's quite ridiculous. kind of a pick of destiny thing, i think? like the some unspoken rumor going on that they have the devil's mojo. Even some of the great guys who didn't play Les Paul's still had PAF's. Keith Richards has a PAF on his 52 Tele in the neck. EVH had that famous striped Kramer he got famous with... only one pickup in that guitar - and it was a PAF.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 29, 2009, 06:45:46 AM
Auction just ended.  Someone apparently wanted to help the economy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on May 29, 2009, 08:39:28 AM
Ended early by Hackett's guitar tech, so presumably somebody made an acceptable offer that wasn't quite the $125,000. Sadly, its probably going to be a 'bargain' wall decoration for a Rock Cafe as such famous instruments normally are when priced to sell.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on May 29, 2009, 09:00:16 AM
Or the wall of a corporate office.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 05, 2009, 09:27:47 AM
FFH2 and now Drakensang kinda eating into guitar time, blah. But I've been making some really good progress soloing in major keys, still using Jessica as the basis for improvisation. I've got most of the plug-ins down, the main riffs that structure the improv parts, I can get into and out of them with several versions of the song. The original version is the toughest for me to play, they play it a bit faster than about every other recording of it, and they've changed the intro strum riff. When I was first learning it, my fiancee kept saying I was playing it wrong, but it felt right to me. I listened to the album and it was wrong, but I just keep playing it wrong (more like the Chuck's piano part). I was playing to the Jazz Fest 2007 version (with Chuck) and the modern incarnation of the band plays the intro the way I do  :drill:

I've still got to put it together with the theory, I've mostly been sounding out sweet spots, and can't figure if they're using major or mixolydian (flatted 7th), because neither 7th sounds right and I've also got to work to make the major 3rd sound right. But I've got a couple nice bend spots (love the 2nd) and some cross-neck applications. Also, the modern ABB is SO DAMNED GOOD, playing call & response with Derek and Warren has been leading me to much less of a homing on the root and letting things breathe a bit. Really good stuff.

Once I put together some of the improv work I'm doing now with some theory so I know a bit better what I'm playing, then work on integrating that with minor and modal playing...I'll finally start to be a decent guitarist.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 05, 2009, 11:57:32 PM
I've always meant to take a whack at learning Jessica... I love that song.

Got a Shoutcast stream hooked up to my Metaplace world now, so I can play live to people in the world. Just tested it tonight with three people, but it was kinda fun! No audible feedback from them, though, which was a bit weird.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: taolurker on June 06, 2009, 02:35:59 AM
Some days I miss singing with a band and wish I learned a musical instrument instead of trying to be a crooner.

I personally love the Allmans and used to sing a few of their songs.

If only I weren't in New Jersey, pushing forty and without musicians or contacts anymore, I'd still be out earning some cash singing.

I always wished I could play guitar, and have all the respect for guitar people.

I want the next Raph album interpretive music sample to feature Jessica and then maybe I'll ask about starting the MMO Blues Band.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 07, 2009, 09:08:35 AM
I can sing Jessica great!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: taolurker on June 07, 2009, 10:27:55 AM
Jessica has no vocals... but you knew that.

I have yet to meet any guitarist play that reasonably well, and was wanting to hear a Raph jam of that. Can you play it Sky?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2009, 08:47:58 AM
Well, that's a bit of a thing. I played metal for many years, and fucked myself by learning minor and pentatonic (and I think phrygian) scales incredibly well. Can play 'em backwards, forwards, all over the neck, play chords up and down, etc. But I'm a major key retard, it's difficult to play anything musical in major keys for me, which is why I'm working on Jessica, which has an extended jam section in D major (the song is in A). So the improv parts are a good workout for me, and I'm getting better. Also applied it to the E major solo in Melissa yesterday out on the back patio playing to my fiancee. So the idea is working, but it takes time.

That said, yeah I can play it, but there are two fuzzy parts. Where the piano solo leads into the guitar improv section, I pretty much hack that every time. Just need to sit down and go over it a few times, I learn quickly and then practice repetitively to imprint in memory. (I actually sat in with a metal band in the 90s after seeing them play the song once live, and learned it from watching, heh...but I was on top of my game back then). The other part is coming out of the improv section back down to the main melody in A. I mostly learned it by just playing along, but I need to go back and isolate my part (there are two lines) and commit it to memory so it's not quite so messy.

Also, the modern Allmans love to sit on the 7th for a while, so the outro is different, centered on G before resolving to A. The original version just outros in A.

Then it's back to nailing down Liz Reed.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 08, 2009, 08:55:43 AM
Well, that's a bit of a thing. I played metal for many years, and fucked myself by learning minor and pentatonic (and I think phrygian) scales incredibly well. Can play 'em backwards, forwards, all over the neck, play chords up and down, etc. But I'm a major key retard, it's difficult to play anything musical in major keys for me, which is why I'm working on Jessica, which has an extended jam section in D major (the song is in A). So the improv parts are a good workout for me, and I'm getting better. Also applied it to the E major solo in Melissa yesterday out on the back patio playing to my fiancee. So the idea is working, but it takes time.

If I recall correctly, don't Walter Becker, Clapton, and David Gilmour play a lot of their solos in major keys?  Might give you some other examples to work with.  


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 08, 2009, 09:35:33 AM
I wish I knew wtf I was doing on a music theory level. I just don't - and honestly, I don't care! Not to be rude or anti-music theory. I'm just really kind of lazy in that way.. it's a fault. I think learning gypsy and setzer's take on rockabilly though is starting to make me move in other ways... jumping to some odd 7th or diminished sounding shit seems to come more naturally now. I think for years I was stuck in that mode where pentatonic stuff always made the most musical sense in my subconscious.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2009, 09:42:36 AM
I think for years I was stuck in that mode where pentatonic stuff always made the most musical sense in my subconscious.
Because that was the theory you knew! As someone who actually was taught theory, it really bothered me how little I could apply to the guitar. I've talked about the CAGED system before here, but for me it's a miracle. It does take a lot of time applying the concepts, but the basics are pretty simple. But supremely powerful! I /highly/ recommend these books to start with, in this order (and all three are worth getting):

http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-SE-Reasoning-Arpeggios/dp/0962477060/
http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Fretboard-Workbook-Barrett-Tagliarino/dp/0634049011/
http://www.amazon.com/Chord-Tone-Soloing-Guitarists-Improvising/dp/0634083651/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 08, 2009, 10:03:29 AM
Hmm, thanks, I'll think about it.  :awesome_for_real:

I'm sort of on an all-round self improvement kick anyways.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2009, 10:36:10 AM
I'm sort of on an all-round self improvement kick anyways.
That's a good philosophy for life, because it should be more than a kick, but a underlying approach to life. I've gradually tried to better myself, but for the last four years I've really made a concerted effort to become a better person and it pays off more than I ever could've imagined.

"A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life." - Muhammed Ali


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on June 08, 2009, 10:38:00 AM
I'm sort of on an all-round self improvement kick anyways.
That's a good philosophy for life, because it should be more than a kick, but a underlying approach to life. I've gradually tried to better myself, but for the last four years I've really made a concerted effort to become a better person and it pays off more than I ever could've imagined.

"A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life." - Muhammed Ali

It helps more if you have a fiance though. You're cheating  :grin: :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 11, 2009, 09:18:24 AM
So I looked up the tab on ultimate-guitar. The fingering isn't hard for 1 guitar part -- remembering all the little variations and the timing is the hardest part. But it sounds WAY thin solo acoustic with just the one part. Actually, it sounded way thin solo electric too. I am tempted to come up with a fingerstyle arrangement. Someone must have done that before... hmm.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 12, 2009, 11:18:00 AM
I had a rough version on the MR8HD that I transferred over to the pc, but apparently time warner is using some retarded new flash-based home page system so I can't just link it. Not sure how to upload it to the tube with just audio. So there's that. Not like it was great anyway, veeery rough in spots due to being a work in progress since I'm just using it to learn major improv...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 16, 2009, 08:15:13 AM
Here's a link to my pile of shit new TW style homepage (http://home.rr.com/cashwiley). It's got a flash player thing. Usual disclaimers apply. Just a recording I made to listen back and critique, I'm wicked hard on myself. As I said, the point is to work out jamming in a major key, so there is some repetitiveness and bum notes because when I really start letting go, I slip into minor still. Also, I'm still working on the bridges into and out of the improv section so those are messy as hell. The version I play over is from Jazzfest 2007 with Chuck Leavell sitting in, so there's an extended piano solo and I haven't quite worked out the kinks in the rhythm parts, I've got them more or less down but need to plug them into each other and get it grooving...and Chuck does go on for a while, which you can't hear so it sounds odd. Finally, for some reason the recording ended up quiet, though I used my normal recording methods, just turn it up and picture the paint peeling, it was LOUD in the room :)

Anyway, this one's for Tau. :)

A question for the crowd, how do you like the tone? That's where I'm at with the boost channel of the Fulldrive. Mostly use it to fatten up the Fender amp and give the dry signal more sustain, but I do come from a metal background so it's hard for me to dial back the overdrive  :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 17, 2009, 11:55:07 PM
Nice. :)

The tone sounds good except for a sharp bit of noise on the attack sometimes in the early part? It's got more bite than what I associate with this tune, which makes for a refreshing change.

Also, does the version you are playing to have all the slide downs on all the notes ending phrases? Or is that just the way you play it? Again, mostly in the early part.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 18, 2009, 07:18:08 AM
I dunno, I don't go for perfecting the way they play it. So the little slide down parts is just how I play, I've kind of always slid into notes like that. Always liked legato sound and hammer/pulls and bends and whatnot.

The aggressive attack...also how I play. I use a 1.5mm pick on 11s and really dig into it. Clapton was slowhand, I'm heavy hand. Another thing I do wrong when I play fast, economy of motion isn't something I've embraced :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 19, 2009, 09:10:25 AM
You certainly play guitar better than I do.  Having admitted that, my comments:

I'm guessing you played this on the SG.  It's thin.  It really begs for some sustain and maybe a touch of chorus/reverb. Your strong attack also makes this much more noticeable.  You also seem a bit nervous while playing this (from the sound of the recording).  I can understand as you always get a little of this when recording... the only way to get past the tense feel is to play it so much on tape that you stop caring that the tape is rolling.  I'd love to hear you re-record this again in a few weeks after you've played the song to death.  I bet it would have a more relaxed feel.  Technically, you're fine.  I just don't think you've got your soul into the tune yet because it's still new.  In time, I bet this comes to life and will be played with more of a sense of ownership.

Do you know what I mean?  Right now, it sounds like you're playing someone else's licks.  I want to hear the song played more like Sky would play it. 



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 19, 2009, 09:51:39 AM
I despise chorus/verb. Lack of it is a normal complaint about everything I do :) Using the boost stage of the FD2 pedal gives me a lot more sustain than I have playing normally. Any more and it goes into metal territory, so it's basically the best I've been able to wring out thus far with the SG 61 RI > Fulldrive 2 > Fender 65 Deluxe RI. The Fender amp is what contributes to the lack of sustain (at middle volumes) and thinner tone. I pretty much always use the rhythm pickup for the fatter tone. Maybe it was the way it was mic'd?

Sky doesn't know how he'd play it because Sky is just learning to solo in major keys and has no voice there yet. There are a few moments where I get close, but I've got way more than a few weeks before I settle into a comfort zone playing a song in a major key.

Also, I have awesome musical adhd and haven't played the song since I recorded this last week :P Last night I was playing along with The Song Remains The Same and it's really not Pagey's best moments, the newer DVD set has much better stuff. But there's a lot of great ideas, especially when he's not really paying attention to what he's playing, I was trying to lift some of his rhythm work during Stairway, he does a nice passage that's very Hendrixy (probably my favorite rhythm player, oddly enough).

Thanks for the critique, it really helps. MOAR PLZ! :) Now I'm inspired to dick around with the tone some more. I've been toying with the idea of one of those EQ pedals or something, I used to have a big parametric when I was recording back in the day and I love the control it gives you.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 19, 2009, 10:37:17 AM
Please don't take my comments as negative.  They were intended as food for thought.  Of course, they do contain some personal taste, so your comments there help me better understand your intentions.

You play well.  I just want to hear your guitar sing!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 19, 2009, 12:08:13 PM
Don't mistake me, I'm not taking them negatively. I enjoy honesty because it's difficult to get honest critique out of most people around me, as they're both nice and not musicians.

I'm not nearly as good a guitarist as I seem to be :) My decent technique hides my crappy playing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 19, 2009, 02:39:36 PM
I dunno, I don't go for perfecting the way they play it. So the little slide down parts is just how I play, I've kind of always slid into notes like that. Always liked legato sound and hammer/pulls and bends and whatnot.

I actually meant sliding AWAY, not into notes. You'd finish a phrase and on the last note, slide down and away. I mention it because it felt like you did it a tad too much early on, then later on you used it more rarely. But early on it jumped out at me as a performance "tic."



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 19, 2009, 02:45:40 PM
Ah, I hear it now. Yeah, just filling some space, couldn't really hear it when I was playing it with my ipod earbuds in blasting the original recording, but listening back I can. Stuff like that is why I record it, find my tics. Though with the full band it wouldn't sound quite so out of place.

Not as bad as Derek Trucks doing that with his slide while he pauses, he's one of my very favorite guitarists but that drives me batty.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 22, 2009, 07:47:17 AM
Played a bunch over the weekend, working on a bunch of technical stuff like chord shapes, arpeggios and even venturing into the dangerous 'slipping a mixolydian over the IV', one of the milestones I've been heading toward. I really enjoy where I am now on guitar, even if it's frustrating at times. I have decent enough technique to achieve most goals I set for myself if I put in the time and effort to practice, but not so knowledgeable that I'm burned out on stuff or cynical.

Most of what I was doing was just goofing off with tab books and trying to internalize what I was playing, analyzing chords and figuring out scales. I'm still a bit weak in scale analyzation (ok, wicked weak). But I'm getting a lot better about understanding chords, and the time I put in with the CAGED system has really been paying off, even with the half-assed effort I put in. For example, there was a C-shape E chord in a Zep tune that my fingers just went to because of the system, before CAGED I had never played a C or G shape closed chord up the neck. Then there was a nice A I'll have to remember, he uses a couple open strings to give it a nice air. With the stock Bm, the chords were: Bm x24432 E x76454 A x07650. Though I continue to be unable to play good A-shape chords due to my stubby fingertips and relatively big knuckles, don't think I'll ever get good at those (ex: x79997).

Then the arpeggio work came out of dicking around that passage from Stairway I mentioned. Need to incorporate more of those chord tones in my soloing, very nice and easy melodic effect. Some more chord and arpeggio study with a cheesy fingerpicking classical book I have, really nice for working out theory because they don't list chords over the staff like most rock guitar books and the author loved to invert and play partials.

I threw in my Warren Haynes DVD, he covers a lot of basic stuff, but he's such a great player I always pick things up just jamming along with it. And of course, a lot of the gaps in my playing are pretty basic, thus the mixo over IV I mentioned above. Just being able to finally break away from pentatonics in a standard blues will be huge. Lots of work to get there, but it'll definitely pay off big time (hell, just a nice bend on the 2 resolving to root (of the I) is a nice addition over the IV, a riff I lifted from Jessica!). I usually have to shut Warren off after a half hour because my brain starts to overload, it's great stuff.

Need more hours in the day!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 29, 2009, 12:03:47 PM
I hope I sound like this when I'm 73.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yv1knfDLRTA

Front row ftw.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on July 29, 2009, 05:38:46 PM
Heh.. hey i followed your youtube link and saw your cliff vid too. Pretty good, man. You gotta a great feel for it. Bet it sounds great when you're really cranked up. :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 29, 2009, 09:14:55 PM
Yeah, it was much better when I was actually a bass player! Plus, running through a 2x15 with some dirt and a wah, loud enough to shake your molars. Part of why I get down on myself about guitar is that I was pretty damned good on the bass in my day. Ran into our first drummer a week ago and he wants to put together a Rush tribute and was pissed I don't play bass any more. I'd love to get into it again, playing bass is a lot of fun if you can find people who don't get intimidated by a good bass instrumentalist (vs a regular bassist). Just need about four more hours in the day. Wish I had more time to get back on the skins, too.

I should take the guitar bit off, it seems so silly and dated now.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 31, 2009, 12:12:30 PM
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNzc1NDQ0NTY=.html

 :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 12, 2009, 08:51:50 PM
Cool Otis Rush vid I've never seen on Youtube before (I keep track! lol.. )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsXK2zL2-yM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsXK2zL2-yM)


Hey, do you know he plays upside down? As in, he was a lefty, but never restrung.. just turned it upside down. What a trip


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 12, 2009, 10:09:49 PM
That's a cool track I dig the band too. Being a leftie sometimes I'm lumped with playing that way when I'm at parties or at an impromptu jam & only guitars in the house are right hand. Interestingly I have found you can change up your phrasing a little and come up with stuff you wouldn't normally playing with the strings the right way, bit of a mindfuck you're thinking like maybe I should pratice this way around more often but never do it.

My old man gigs with a guy who plays that way http://www.eddeane.com/ (http://www.eddeane.com/) he plays a similar style to Otis Rush when they are doing the Bluesy stuff but a bit more overdriven.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 12, 2009, 11:44:16 PM
Pretty cool vibe to that song, although I can't stand the rubbery sound of his strings.  :grin: Would love to hear his bluesy stuff.


Yeah, Otis Rush is the man. Guitar wise, singing wise.. Even looks cool.  8-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on August 13, 2009, 11:11:04 AM
RIP Les Paul  (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8200385.stm)

This thread would have been alot shorter without Les.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 13, 2009, 11:20:45 AM
RIP Les Paul  (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8200385.stm)

This thread would have been alot shorter without Les.

Sad news. 

The picture was very avatar worthy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 13, 2009, 12:20:50 PM
Even though Les didn't like my SG, it's sad to see him go. He changed the world for the better, not many can say that. Throwing some of his instrumentals on for the afternoon.

Long live The Log!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: 01101010 on August 13, 2009, 02:33:20 PM
Sad day for music in general. Multitrack recording is historical and often gets overlooked because of his awesomeness and the guitars...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 13, 2009, 08:18:50 PM
RIP

I've never owned a Les Paul..  I'm sad about that as well :cry:  :-P Been wanting a standard one in black (with white pg). Only Gibson I've had is an SG too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 13, 2009, 08:41:45 PM
Pretty cool vibe to that song, although I can't stand the rubbery sound of his strings.  :grin: Would love to hear his bluesy stuff.


Yeah, Otis Rush is the man. Guitar wise, singing wise.. Even looks cool.  8-)

It's hard to say if it's his sound really cause everything on Irish TV tends to come out sounding like guff, I think they just hire shoddy engineers.

But yeh Otis I'll be honing in on that guy's stuff. Les Paul had some good innings I hope I'm rocking it to 94.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 14, 2009, 05:07:22 AM
could be the amp too.. some pickups/amps give acoustics that rubbery sound.. i just never dug it. well, except when it's supposed to be rubbery ;D like with a classical guitar

you're in ireland?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 14, 2009, 06:34:03 AM
Actually it could be the delay/looping pedal he is using that has created that rubbery sound & yes I'm Irish, the land of Guinness & Rory Gallagher :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 14, 2009, 06:47:55 AM
That's cool. Well, I bet you can sing too, right? heh


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 14, 2009, 08:02:37 AM
I used to think I could after a few pints like any bonafide Irish man, but to be honest I'm a terrible singer, I can play a bit of harmonica though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 14, 2009, 08:19:48 AM
When I was shopping for a decent guitar a few years ago, the first guitar I tried was a Black Beauty style with triple buckers. Not a fan of the baseball bat necks, though that may have changed since I last tried one out, because my playing has become a lot better/different.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on August 17, 2009, 12:47:26 PM
Sky, did you get those tapes converted to digital tracks yet?

I'm still waiting to see the F13-mixathon contest. :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 17, 2009, 01:29:52 PM
No, I won't be able to afford it until I pay off my truck. The tape has sat in a closet for almost twenty years, a few more won't hurt. Hopefully.

I've been SUPER LAZY about recording, the only thing I've done in an age was that little Jessica jam.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 17, 2009, 05:21:03 PM
Snapped a string on the Blueridge (acoustic) over the weekend. Figured it was a good chance to strip it all down, polish, apply fretboard oil, and in general baby it, and get a new set of Elixirs on it. I fish broken pick bits out of the inside, even slide the pick-up out from under the saddle to make sure I get the gunk out.

Get all the way through it, tune it up, and notice a 2nd fret buzz while tuning it up. Hurm. But coming to pitch fixed it. Still, slightly worrisome.

Then I try it plugged in, and there's basically no signal. With both knobs all the way up there's almost nothing through the amp. Very perplexing. I start wondering if I broke a lead on the pickup. I try half a dozen things... check it's not the cable, did I have a knob turned down on the pedal...

Then I notice that the bridge saddle fell out while I was polishing, and I had restrung the guitar without it in there at all. Doh. Turns out undersaddle pickups do better if there's a saddle touching them.

Sounds AND looks great now. Waiting for the overly jangly sound of fresh strings to subside a bit though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 17, 2009, 05:24:17 PM
I don't think I've ever used elixir acoustics. Really dislike the electric versions though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 18, 2009, 07:39:28 AM
Yeah, I also dislike coated strings. I'll probably need to replace the strings on my baby soon, I never have so I'm not sure what it's strung with. They're coated, though, and the coating is shredded and everywhere.

Turns out the tuner I hate for my electric is great for the baby (the alvarez has a built-in jobby). It's tough to tune the baby for some reason, so that's nice. I've been playing it a lot the last week or so, been playing a lot more in general. Playing the baby out on the patio for strummy singy type stuff (Wild Horses, One, Old Man, Wish You Were Here, Melissa, On the Road Again, Catfish), still trying to get the coordination down. My strumming really suffers when I sing, I'm working on it but it's sooo tough.

Also been playing the electric a bit more, they're blitzing HD Woodstock content for a few marketing campaigns right now, so there's some good viewing. A whole bunch of footage I hadn't seen and HD versions of some stuff I have. Always fun jamming with Santana or Sly, or getting vocally inspired by Janice. Oddly, Jimi is one of my least favorites. He really turns me off when he's doing his noise lead thing, it may have been revolutionary at the time, but to me it's noise. Actually I probably like Jimi more for his rhythm work than his leads! And Shankar and Havens are a nice inspiration to jam to, as well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 18, 2009, 09:17:05 AM
Elixir strings remind me of listening to cds through a tube preamp.  They take the bite off the attack.  If you like a strong attack (as someone like Sky may), they're not going to be your thing.  I play with elixirs because they hold their sound well over weeks of unuse.  I prefer the brighter tone of uncoated strings, but they lose their shine when I leave my guitar idle for weeks to play my bass more. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 18, 2009, 09:56:50 AM
I dislike the snappy jangly bright tone of new strings -- my playing depends on a variety of tones, and I find that too much of the metal jangle limits that. Elixirs are quieter out of the box, fight the oils in my fingers a lot better (I kill uncoated strings FAST), and were a must when playing outdoors all the time for the Cub Scouts.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 18, 2009, 10:38:39 AM
I love old crappy strings, I generally only change them when they break. Taking the bite off the attack might be good for me, except I don't like the coatings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 18, 2009, 04:31:00 PM
Yeah, I've been looking for the old crappy robert johnson sound.. Can't do anything with brightness.  :grin: Classicals sound pretty great when bright though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 21, 2009, 09:47:53 AM
Got in the new Mastodon the other day, really getting me back into the metal vibe. Such a great album. The drummer is almost exactly how I wish I could play, and the bass player is a monster at creating melody.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nkeBG0nh84
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YloOBK60c04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVTat27lkmM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDZckzjjK5Y

Rocking the strat at one point, and a cool 9-string at about 4 minutes.

I want to go play some guitar (or drums) right now! Should have my drum riser set up in my basement soon, I'm psyched.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 24, 2009, 10:22:18 PM
Despite the metal vibe I had, the gods of creativity have given me a new country tune (Get Off My Back) and a new blues tune (Old Black Magic).  :why_so_serious: Strange are their ways. I'll try to at least get a taste of them up if anyone's interested, you know I never finish things :)

Saturday we saw the Allmans with Widespread Panic opening. Not a jam band fan, and frankly those fans are annoying (if usually harmless). Last time we saw the ABB, Ratdog was opening. Both jam bands feature mediocre songs with rambling, centerless jams. At least Widespread Panic features Jimmy Herring, who fucking jams and elevates the band when he's playing. He sat in with ABB for a couple amazing jams, including a phenomenal three guitar Liz Reed.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on August 25, 2009, 03:57:15 AM
Look forward to it! I know I have problems recording too. I think I actually just hate the recording process. At least if I'm the one who has to do everything.

My little vox amp has turned to shit (can't repair it.. it's digital). I think I should save for a Line 6. They're better anyways. I like the digital thing, despite the weird problems I'm having (seems to be some short, where the volume kicks down a notch, and everything gets "tinny". I'm not going to even bother figuring it out).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 30, 2009, 03:08:59 PM
Been ages, but I posted up a new recording. Old old old song though. http://www.raphkoster.com/2009/08/30/the-sunday-song-the-sculptor/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2009, 02:25:02 PM
This has got to be legit:

Quote
for sale 1958 gibson ele gutair - $60

I have a 1958 gibson ele gutair for sale body has been refinish has bran new saddle all org keys only needs pick ups put in hollow body literst gutair you will ever hold in you hand color metelic red use to have four volume switch pick up s were a double set of hummbuc asking 60.00 obo call gary anytime


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 03, 2009, 10:21:37 PM
lol it might have made sense if he just said "gibson" (then you'd assume he was a dumbass just referring to shape, not exact model)



not sure where else to fit this. i decided to stop thumbing my nose for a second.... and discovered that my chemical romance is one fucking amazing band. i wrote them off as typical emo for years now (kinda surprised that the singer is older than me).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 04, 2009, 07:15:42 AM
I've always liked MCR, they seem pretty creative and talented for what they do. Ran into an old guitar buddy who says my second drummer is trying to get him into a project. They're both metal guys, and the stuff they listen to is a lot heavier than the Mastodon type stuff I've been listening to lately. But they're both very talented and the guitarist has a career, kids, etc so it fits in nicely with the whole "not full time band" idea I've been thinking about. Too bad they're about six years too late, I'm way past my metal peak. And they'd want me to play bass, because they both know what a badass bassist I was. Ah, well.

Lately I've mostly been playing the Baby, it's got tone and voice that just won't quit. Whether I'm playing a blues or a classical piece, it sounds so much better than my Alvarez that it's kind of embarrassing for Alvarez imo. I've also been working on a few country tracks. They're fairly difficult since they're playing and singing simultaneously, which is still a barrier for me. Lots of blues where there is space to play then sing, but country guys are usually strumming along and even simple strums trip me up vocally. Bunch of Willie stuff, a couple Cash tunes, some odds and ends that might go well at the local bar, Friends in Low Places kinda stuff.

I wish I could focus on one thing, heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 04, 2009, 11:41:30 AM
It's funny, but I almost want to say MCR delivers on just about everything I'd want out of a rock band. It's crazy actually... how they sort of meet this checklist I had in my head. And I was writing them off the whole time simply on what amounts to appearances.

I also wrote Billy Corgan off for the longest time for the same reasons (and it's funny that Gerard Way resembles him..).


Sounds like you should save up for a real Taylor ;)


I have lousy right hand technique, so that's the only thing that trips me up when trying to sing. I can sing fine when doing up-down strumming motions. Problem is, a lot of my own songs aren't like that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on September 04, 2009, 03:18:27 PM
Hey, Sky.

is your baby the spruce or mahogany one?  just curious.

Edit:  nevermind, you've got the mahogany one.  Search function FTW!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 05, 2009, 12:14:45 PM
Sounds like you should save up for a real Taylor ;)
I was just lamenting my big miss. The guy I mentioned in my last post used to manage a chain music store. One day I was there and he told me to check out the Taylor they got in. Another store in the chain couldn't sell it, so he took it at a discount. It was a nylon string cutaway, but with a neck that was not a full classical neck, much more playable for regular guitarists, but still wider to keep the feel of a classical, plus a cutaway, spruce top/ebony board. It was amazing, the best acoustic I've ever played and it was going for $800 a few years ago...normal price around $1400 iirc. I was in hardcore savings mode and didn't get it.

The whole way home I was going on about it, and all night. My fiancee told me to go back and buy it. Went back the next day and it was gone, shoulda called my friend and had him put it away when they opened. My biggest missed opportunity for gear since I passed up a BC Rich Bich in a pawn shop when I was 15.

We were just talking about that stupid guitar (the Taylor cutaway), he was wishing he had bought it, too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2009, 01:19:48 PM
Yeah, that sucks.. Has happened to me too.


Hey, check out Seagull guitars. Not Taylors, but they are cheaper and still pretty nice. Better than your Alv maybe.. (I dunno).. They have wide, yet not too wide necks too.. But they are steel strings. I think if you sat down with one, you wouldn't be disappointed. Been meaning to get one myself..


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on September 20, 2009, 03:10:51 PM
Live from Iraq! Me fucking around (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/82469/mario.wmv). Is it just me, or do songs become infinitely more difficult once you try to record? I can usually play the entire song (well past where the recording stops) with only a minor error here or there. I hit record and its like I've never played before in my life!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on September 20, 2009, 04:16:28 PM
I can usually play the entire song (well past where the recording stops) with only a minor error here or there. I hit record and its like I've never played before in my life!
Years ago when I was young and screwing around more, I would just record any time I played.  That way it didn't matter whether I was good or bad, I could save the takes I liked and junk the rest.  Very little pressure when it is something you are always doing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on September 20, 2009, 04:52:57 PM
Yeah, that's what I intend to do. I'm basically days away from being home, so I've done a little online shopping. I've bought a new amp and digital recorder, and once I get back I'm sure I'll make some more purchases. I'm excited about the recorder though! 8 tracks and with an internal HDD, and also can burn to a CD.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on September 20, 2009, 06:38:21 PM
Quite a long ways away from my tape recorder plugged into a cheap amp ;-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 20, 2009, 07:39:44 PM
I think recording is unbearably hard.. I give up 3/4's of the time. I'm just not responsible enough with my music.. always thought it'd be better if someone directed me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 21, 2009, 07:40:54 AM
Yeah, recording these days is much tougher. I have no patience for multiple takes. Back in the olden tymes, we recorded so much we couldn't help but have good performances. But then, we were playing every day for hours so we were super-tight, even recorded our first demo in one shot with time left to play one song twice (I think we had an hour booked :)). Guy was a jazz engineer, so he was used to recording live stuff in his studio, great experience. We used a boom box and recorded everything we played, and we used to play a good four hours a day together. The tragedy: I only have two tapes of the thousands we had.

Now with the digital 8 track, it's nice for jotting stuff down, but I'm absolutely awful with finishing things. I blame it on the adhd (srsly). Mine doesn't burn CDs, though. I just wrote another one, another spanishy feeling one that kinda came out of nowhere. I'm tentatively calling it Uno Más. But as a sketch, I'm playing it as I'm writing it, so it's positively terrible, but there are definitely some moments of potential in there.

CJT: that was wicked! Though I hate that song  :why_so_serious: Nice sound from the uke.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on September 21, 2009, 08:13:35 AM
Probably a mixture of adhd and unhealthy perfectionism for me. I'm that way in general unfortunately. For instance, I went through a sketchpad the other day.. and only had 2 drawings to show for it. Kept ripping everything else out. Recording is the same.. Maybe when I'm in a band type of groove, I make less mistakes, I don't know.. But when I record, I'll start detecting the slightest fuckups or variation in rhythm, and keep trying to redo everything.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 21, 2009, 09:30:25 AM
I can't begin to tell you how many bands booted me because I was a perfectionist in the booth.  This is one reason why I'm hesitant to release anything to you guys.  I obsess over recordings to the point of it being unhealthy. 

Sadly, I was the same about live performances.  It got really bad when I started getting into successful bands where entertainment took priority over musical quality.  Playing with alcoholics and drug addicts really ruined my joy for live performance. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: climbjtree on September 22, 2009, 02:45:45 AM
Thanks Sky! Irritates me that I can't lay down the whole thing though.

I think I've developed some pretty bad habits playing only the ukulele the last year. I watched the video and noticed that I only pick with two fingers as well as a few other things. We'll see how things go when I get back!

I'm definitely buying an upscale keyboard too. It's certainly what I'm most excited about.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 22, 2009, 09:17:27 AM
Nice sounding uke!

The new Rodrigo y Gabriela CD arrived from Amazon, and there was a DVD with video lessons. I can now do Gabriela's crazy percussive strum at 1/4 speed.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 23, 2009, 08:04:55 AM
I want to get my fiancee into the piano again, she keeps coming up with reasons not to  :oops: She played many years ago, and she wants a new hobby. Duh!

Anyway, re: strums. I was playing the baby in the mirror and noticed my strums are slowly (!!) improving, too. I'm stuck between wanting to learn real flamenco right hand technique (ZOMG TOUGH) and going with my inspiration, Conrado Garcia, who says just play it however it feels natural and don't pay too much attention. Since the latter is easy, and I'm lazy, I've been going that route. Caught myself in the mirror doing Babe I'm Gonna Leave You and the triplet strummy part looks kind of impressive, and follows Garcia's method :) Sometimes I do it with a flamencoish index finger flourish, sometimes I do it with my old bass guitar three-finger strum (thanks Steve Harris).

But I am trying to apply good principles to it, flamenco (and probably classical, been so long I forget) wants you to flick the three fingers down to get the nail sound, and it does sound good. But my brain always wants to do the three fingers up, because that's how it works on the bass (if you look at that mediocre anesthesia on the tube, I use it here and there, and the riff around 1:50 is based on it). I've grown my right hand nails out and enjoy the sound the nail lends to fingerpicking, but I don't think I can be assed to keep them up like a pro. I also have issues with fingerpicking over the soundhole, because I like to feel something solid with the corner heel of my hand, I can't just float pick it (well).

Working on a couple Francisco Tarrega tunes and still in that spanishy vibe. Not sure where that really comes from :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on September 23, 2009, 08:45:25 AM
Speaking of Anesthesia...I found this recording from circa 2001 that I did of the first part of Anesthesia after I got my ProCo Rat distortion pedal.

Distortion on bass is a real PITA, since it tends to get really muddy.  This was on my incredibly shitty Peavey Foundation bass, which has the worst pickups known to mankind.  I'd like to redo it on my new Ibanez.

Check it out here (http://lainesbrain.homelinux.org/mp3/ANA-EDIT-M.mp3)

Speaking of gear lust, I've been really wanting to get one of these:
(http://www.chrisguitars.com/fen-geddylee-jazz-mirc.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 23, 2009, 09:57:08 AM
Sky, the Gabriela 4/4 strum for most of the R y G tunes is slap, index up, middle/ring down and on the nail, thumb up and on the nail. The triplets she does are index down, thumb down, thumb up.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 23, 2009, 02:38:10 PM
That index thumb down thumb up sounds like one I was experimenting with, you get a nice flow going once you get it moving.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 03, 2009, 12:19:46 AM
finally bought one of those Seagulls I kept mentioning.. The S6 dread (kind of their basic flagship). Pretty awesome. And only $400. If it was American, it'd be priced like a basic Martin probably. IMO though, it sounds better. edit: Oh, forgot.. most of their gits are wide neck, so that's another reason I got it. Finally can move around with fingerstyles a bit more. But they do have like 2 models that are standard width (a dread and a mini jumbo).

Anyways! I love not having a shitty acoustic guitar  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2009, 01:49:49 AM
Cool beans! I really need to sell my Alvarez at some point, I never play it any more. The Baby has totally spoiled me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 04, 2009, 10:51:22 PM
Check these out.. It might be the kind of guitar that'll sit happily next to the Taylor.. without actually having to buy a Taylor.

I heard Larivee is good too (also Canadian).. they're stuff is reasonably priced, but what I heard is that the owner was one of the main dudes who helped Taylor get his start (I forgot which actual building technique he contributed though).

Now on to saving up for an LP Custom.. I only want an Epi though  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 14, 2009, 07:43:53 AM
I'm apparently becoming a country artist. Discussing teeth with my fiancee, I mentioned I only had three wisdom teeth. She asked if I had one pulled, I told her it never came in. But the way I phrased it was: "Jesus stole my wisdom tooth."

Inspiration, and a new song, Jesus Stole My Wisdom Tooth (I Am A Dumbass Now).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 14, 2009, 07:54:43 AM
I came across this bass exercise called the 'spider' from John Patitucci's bass instructional video:

Code:

The spider:

G: -----7-----8-----5-----6--  (Repeat x times)
D: --5-----6-----7-----8-----
A: --------------------------
E: --------------------------
     1  3  2  4  3  1  4  2


-----7-----8-----5-----6--
--------------------------
--5-----6-----7-----8-----
--------------------------

-----7-----8-----5-----6--
--------------------------
--------------------------
--5-----6-----7-----8-----

It works on guitar too of course.  It's absolutely brutal on the coordination at anything but very slow speeds.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 14, 2009, 08:34:30 AM
That's interesting. I used to do a lot of shape practice back in the day, but I never really do stuff like that anymore. I'll rarely do some scale run practice, but my speed has gone way down and I hardly use it anymore. On the flip side, I'm thinking a lot more about what I'm playing, trying to spontaneously compose (a phrase I lifted from a baroque composition book talking about blues heh). So at some point I'll probably build up speed again when my brain can keep up with it. I'm amazingly dysfunctional on guitar.

One pattern exercise I was using a couple years ago was trying to play only using the ring and pinky fingers. I do still do some hammer-on exercises, but I'm a huge Iommi fan and nobody can touch his hammers. So working ring/pinky hammers or even middle/ring hammers can get brutal real quick.

A funny thing about that bass pattern...when I tap my fingers, I can't do it well straight, pima(+pinky, not sure if theres a letter, heh). I do it pmiam(pinky) or the same with dropping the thumb. It's similar in practice to that pattern.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 14, 2009, 08:46:46 AM
Still a lazy-ass with scales and such. I'm just rhythm. But not in that way where I've ever happy with bass either. I'm just big on those thumps and melodies that worth repeating - on guitar.

I think making up dozens of melodies and lines on spot... being lead and shit.. that's really cool. But I know my limits, and haven't been able to do it well for years. So fuck it. :P

Doing that and playing rhythm well even better.. That's probably the definition of a guitar "god", I think. Some lead players *think* they are guitar gods for simply being able to play rhythm, and good lead, but they are not gods. Their rhythms suck. In this case, I feel like I might have a few things they can't do. The lines they care to repeat suck.. That's why no one listens to them except enthusiasts. But then you got the Slashes, and the Jimis, and whatnot.. Those guys are great. But I know I'm not them either.

Wtf am I talking about anyways.. ? /rantoff  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 14, 2009, 10:38:28 AM
I found a YouTube showing the technique (well, the first one playing adjacent strings)...when it's fast it's very  :uhrr:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsAEUryULPc


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 14, 2009, 02:50:41 PM
Stray, I've mentioned before that Jimi is one of my favorite rhythm guitarists. Everyone focuses on his leads, but I like the other stuff better. I can do a bit of it in Wind Cries Mary, but it's so deep and effortless. Early Eddie VH was like that, too. Lots of arpeggios and fills, and a heavy slathering of good strumming.

The bit I mentioned about spontaneous composition was pretty cool. They were writing it to a classical composer audience, but said it was worth learning how to solo over blues changes because that's a solid foundation for endless improvisation and got into a bit about improvisation being a great testing ground for ideas you were working through for written composition, basically you're taking the incredibly challenging task of composing solid musical ideas and compressing it into real time and also throwing uncontrolled variables in the form of other musicians.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2009, 04:00:07 AM
Stray, I've mentioned before that Jimi is one of my favorite rhythm guitarists. Everyone focuses on his leads, but I like the other stuff better. I can do a bit of it in Wind Cries Mary, but it's so deep and effortless. Early Eddie VH was like that, too. Lots of arpeggios and fills, and a heavy slathering of good strumming.

The bit I mentioned about spontaneous composition was pretty cool. They were writing it to a classical composer audience, but said it was worth learning how to solo over blues changes because that's a solid foundation for endless improvisation and got into a bit about improvisation being a great testing ground for ideas you were working through for written composition, basically you're taking the incredibly challenging task of composing solid musical ideas and compressing it into real time and also throwing uncontrolled variables in the form of other musicians.

Yeah, that's always been my favorite way to hear guitar playing.. All of those leads of VH or Hendrix in their progressions and shit.. But the underlying songs and rhythms were just catchy too (and usually technically thinking outside the box as well), which sets them apart.

Anyways, I can "spontaneously" compose a bit, but you know, it's just like blues licks and and a few things I pick up here and there. I just can't shred. Oh, and I'm probably overly defensive right now cuz I recently had a run-in with shredders.  :grin: I should just smack these fuckers (literally), because they're the types that have specifically said Hendrix and people like that are overrated. I sometimes think that they come from a different planet, and see music differently. It's.. like music is just some big mathematical + dexterity wankfest for them. I wish I had their talent and understanding though. I think I'd do something better with it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2009, 07:01:12 AM
I got over that pretty early, but I always listened to a wide variety of stuff. While I was in high school, I remember a couple of younger kids talking in the hall one day about sharping some note descending on some scale kinda thing, a long discussion on all this technical stuff. Having heard the guitarist in question, I broke in and said, "Yeah, but your feel sucks. You can't calculate that." Dave Gilmour played on the first 45 I bought with my own money, and I grew up in the era of great FM radio. All the classical stuff came later, but I was just old enough that I could take my enjoyment of classical music and apply it to guitar, rather than be influenced indirectly by Yngwie and co. And our band was thrash, so my early shred was more Kerry King than Yngwie :)

I was working that pattern a bit last night, it's a good workout but my brain slips off it and I keep forgetting what I'm playing because it's not very melodic. I guess I like to practice things I actually play, even though I see the merit in a separate exercise for your hands like that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2009, 07:18:01 AM
Heh well it doesn't help that the guy who taught me was into surfer stuff (and not even Dick Dale.. more like the slower Ventures stuff). Cool though. From there, I learned Sex Pistols and Misfits songs. That wasn't helping. Jimi and Chuck Berry were my first real dives into something better. Jimi was always harder back then too because his leads, in like, say, Purple Haze had those octave effects.. Hard to pull off. Damn kids these days have cool Line6 amps and shit. :P Then of course I learned Metallica and Sabbath stuff. Really I've never evolved much beyond that.. power chords and pentatonics :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2009, 07:45:05 AM
Hell, I was using power chords for years. I did make some advances in minor keys and I knew some cowboy chords, but as bad as I feel as I am at theory now, for a long time I was sooo bad, while at the same time at the height of creativity. It's all about using the tools you have to create good music, not matter how primitive or lacking in eloquence. We took on a second guitarist in LA, and he knew theory out the wazoo, a Randy Rhoades guy, and I always envied his tasty chord choices but wasn't able to learn much because I was so focused on the bass at the time. And the guy was a total asshole and the only person ever kicked out of the band.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2009, 08:06:13 AM
Eee, need to correct that.. I mean, of course I know the cowboy chords and various shapes/intervals.. I do barre-ing too, with little hammer ons and progressions and stuff. I can play just about any whacked out diminished or 7th and provide a gypsy jazz rhythm or something.. But my sound I guess is still pretty dependent on just the usual shit. \m/  .. ;)


Not sure if I'd kick out a Randy Rhoads sound-alike in my band. Asshole or not.  :grin:

edit: Just to add, I stayed strictly in that power chord mode for quite some time though. 13-20 ish. I think listening to the Beatles opened up a lot about rhythm for me honestly. Nowadays I try to tell young kids to learn shit like that. They never listen. :P Hell, they don't even want to touch an acoustic and just strum something. Kid next door to me has been playing a year, and he is impressively fast at the chugga-chugga shit.. Better than I ever was (he listens to a lot Slipknot.. stuff like that), but the kid actually has no understanding of chord progression well. So I find it hard jamming with him. He goes nowhere with it, melodically I mean. But I was probably the same way once.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 15, 2009, 08:30:11 AM
We had a Juliard trained guitarist in a band of mine back in the 80's.  The guy could play any style, in any key, and improvise on the fly.  He was also drug free and one of the most humble guys I'd ever met.  Our manager fired him because he was 6' 4", overweight, and had an acne problem.  Shortly after I left the music business. 

I need to learn more chord shapes.  I feel VERY limited in my guitar playing by my knowledge moreso than my ability.  If any of you have some suggestions, I'd be grateful. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2009, 08:49:37 AM
CAGED! I've mentioned it before, but I'm a total convert. It's really opened up the fretboard to me, though I have a looong way to go. I started with this book (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-SE-Reasoning-Arpeggios/dp/0962477060) and still recommend it as the starting point. I later got this book (http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Fretboard-Workbook-Barrett-Tagliarino/dp/0634049011) and I like it better in some ways, though he doesn't adhere to the CAGED naming conventions. I prefer calling it CAGED over 'shape 1 shape 2 etc', because CAGED evokes the cowboy chords we have burned in our memories.

Basically it links chord shapes (and scales derived thereof, though I'm mostly still working on the chords!) up the neck. Get out your guitar and play a cowboy C chord. Then play it as a barre chord on the 3rd fret, that's the A form of the C chord. And then play it behind the barre chord you'd think of on the 8th fret of the 6th string...eh, let me write it out, these are all C chords:

x 3 2 0 1 0 C shape
x 3 5 5 5 3 A Shape
8 7 5 5 5 8 G shape
8 10 10 9 8 8 E shape
x x 10 12 13 12 D shape

Look for places the shapes match up, like the little triangle at the top of the D shape and C shape or the three notes on the same fret shared by the A and G shapes. Powerful stuff. Remember to keep the shape name and chord names separate.

Tagliarino, the guy who wrote the second book I listed also has another book I love that ties into his first book, Chord Tone Soloing (http://www.amazon.com/Chord-Tone-Soloing-Guitarists-Improvising/dp/0634083651). Those three books are the basis of all the improvement I've made over the last couple years. I wish I could go back in time and hand them to my younger self. Instead of memorizing a bajillion chords, learn the basic shapes across the neck and how to properly modify them. There's about a lifetime of study, heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2009, 09:04:20 AM
We had a Juliard trained guitarist in a band of mine back in the 80's.  The guy could play any style, in any key, and improvise on the fly.  He was also drug free and one of the most humble guys I'd ever met.  Our manager fired him because he was 6' 4", overweight, and had an acne problem.  Shortly after I left the music business.  

I need to learn more chord shapes.  I feel VERY limited in my guitar playing by my knowledge moreso than my ability.  If any of you have some suggestions, I'd be grateful.  

I'm not sure what you mean by limited, but like I suggest and what helped me, just learning songs opens up new doors. Or Sky's route is good too. I've never been good at learning anything in the abstract myself. I just start sensing the abstract through people's examples I guess.

Anyways as for songs.. Maybe the Beatles or something like that is simplistic.. Maybe even Jimi is, even though his rhythm is awesome anyways... just that the underlying chords with him are mostly majors and minors.

I'd say try your hand at rumba or gypsy type rhythms.. They're full of unusual chords, or if not that, different techniques.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 15, 2009, 09:22:40 AM
Thank you gentlemen.  Great information!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2009, 11:30:24 AM
NP, Nebu. Let me know if it helps. This quote is me 100%:
I feel VERY limited in my guitar playing by my knowledge moreso than my ability.
I don't know that I'll ever be satisfied with my knowledge /or/ ability :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2009, 11:32:15 AM
I don't know that I'll ever be satisfied with my knowledge /or/ ability :)

Heh. Well I need another guitar player to really sound like I want.

Think Iron Maiden... except the other guitar player doing all the good work.  :grin: Still know that Randy Rhoads-alike-asshole?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 15, 2009, 12:14:29 PM
No, you don't want to know that guy. My band was bad news and he was a problem for us.

I agree with you in a different way about second guitarists. Many of my early influences when we were in metal were dual guitar bands, Priest, Maiden, Mercyful Fate, Metallica, etc. And I love the way bands like the Allmans use harmony runs. I also like having other talented people to bounce song ideas around, I'm horrid at fleshing out my own ideas, but if I have someone to write with I can really be voluminous. We had two strong writers and two weak writers in the band, but everyone wrote something and for the most part had independence to write their own parts unless it was some concept or layered idea. I do miss that part a lot.

Listening to Mastadon right now, another good example of a dual guitar band. (Even if it makes me want to play drums more than guitar)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 15, 2009, 01:21:49 PM
Well, Metallica is actually more of what I'm talking about. I know Hetfield does leads occasionally, but he's more of the riff guy and songwriter. I don't really think they're Maiden like? If I could be Maiden-like though, I would. I told you before that I liked that band Television a lot? Yeah, they're pretty much dueling guitars, but punk (albeit, skilled punks).

Mastodon's cool.. They're just a bit sludgy for me.

Speaking of newer metal bands, I said in that Music thread that I was listening to Emo metal shit. I really don't know what us to call it. Haha.. But really, some of these bands have talent. The guys in Avenged Sevenfold play off each other well. link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuNQ9FgUf5g). Same with Bullet for My Valentine (not everyone's cup of tea, but it's a cool solo imo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKUmcLfOaMg)). I'm sort of surprised that there's some pretty good guitar players coming from left field.. They play better than what passes off as metal these days (FM Radio metal, I mean).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 20, 2009, 11:52:39 AM
If you go to the wolfgang's vault site I posted in the music thread, there's a '78 Guy and Wells show where they play The Thrill is Gone (and the opening jam number) with a similar active bass line to the way I play it :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 20, 2009, 03:50:10 PM
I searched and think I found the right show/track, but I have to register.  :oh_i_see: Will look around there later though. Looks like a unique site.


I don't have much experience playing bass in blues.. What do you mean by active? I sort of just play typical/not very inventive blues walks on bass. Throw in a fill here and there. Are you telling me there's something better?  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 20, 2009, 07:04:04 PM
http://www.wolfgangsvault.com/buddy-guy-and-junior-wells-blues-band/ Well worth the registration, if you browse their full artist list, it's amazing. Just looking at the B list, it's everyone from Bad Brains to the Backstreet Boys. Free streaming and cheap mp3 albums. edit = ok, looking at the artists I just mentioned, they don't have concerts for all the artists they list, woops.

The Jan 9th show, first two tracks. Especially the first one. You will almost never hear a bass player like that in a blues setting, or even a rock setting. Too many guitarists try and propagate the theory that a bass line should just be the root and the guitar should have all the fun.

The book I referenced earlier about composition mentions the rock composition method and gave an 8 measure example of rock bass, all 8th note root playing.  :oh_i_see:

Honestly, though...my blues has a strong funk streak to it. Son Seals, Luther Alison, Albert King with Stax. I like a funky blues or a nice slow minor blues, with a little traditional stuff thrown in...mostly to be able to mesh with other players.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Righ on October 20, 2009, 07:26:11 PM
Heh. Well I need another guitar player to really sound like I want.

Pfft. You just need a stand (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOQdA98HcCM).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 20, 2009, 07:41:49 PM
Lol, he ain't got shit on Nitro (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-XfnkLdkjo)!  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 20, 2009, 08:16:16 PM
http://www.wolfgangsvault.com/buddy-guy-and-junior-wells-blues-band/ Well worth the registration, if you browse their full artist list, it's amazing. Just looking at the B list, it's everyone from Bad Brains to the Backstreet Boys. Free streaming and cheap mp3 albums. edit = ok, looking at the artists I just mentioned, they don't have concerts for all the artists they list, woops.

The Jan 9th show, first two tracks. Especially the first one. You will almost never hear a bass player like that in a blues setting, or even a rock setting. Too many guitarists try and propagate the theory that a bass line should just be the root and the guitar should have all the fun.

The book I referenced earlier about composition mentions the rock composition method and gave an 8 measure example of rock bass, all 8th note root playing.  :oh_i_see:

Honestly, though...my blues has a strong funk streak to it. Son Seals, Luther Alison, Albert King with Stax. I like a funky blues or a nice slow minor blues, with a little traditional stuff thrown in...mostly to be able to mesh with other players.

Grr, still haven't registered.. I'll check it out.

Well, I sort agree that guitar shouldn't have all the fun, but then, it's good for blues to have some anchors. Iif bass players can't have fun just getting a groove, then they should probably be playing a guitar. I'm sure this guy is cool though.. not trying to hate ;)

That said, I don't necessarily like boring, formulaic bass lines either. I like the kind of bass playing that both drives and provides the melody to boot. There's so many badass players, but how many are worth humming to? Or can even be hummed to? I mean in general. It's kind of hard to be melodic in straight blues playing imo. But as for hummable guys, James Jamerson (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND-iW51idC0) is the king imo. I've probably said before that Inner City Blues (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tOpwgrqshU) is my favorite bassline from him, but from what I know, it came out of Gaye watching Jamerson jam around.. So credit goes to Gaye to just limiting it to that main line, I guess. But I think he sort of was "active", I guess? Just not in a "showcasing"/jammy kind of way. More like he was active as a songwriter.. A lot of the principle artists of motown built songs out of his melodies and jamming. Which is pretty remarkable for a bass player. Usually bass players move around and underneath existing melodies. So I would call him the most active bass player ever, considering how many songs he was behind.

[edit]

I feel like buying a bass now. Haven't had one in a long time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 21, 2009, 07:52:30 AM
Quote
I feel like buying a bass now. Haven't had one in a long time.

I'm right there with you.  :grin:

I've played bass (off and on) for the past 20 years, and I sold most of my axes when I had to move.  Right now I have an Ibanez 5 string and an old Peavey Foundation from the late 80's.

I love the Ibanez, but the string spacing is quite narrow (even for a 5 string), so it's not as comfortable for me to just play.  Sounds great recorded however.

I've been looking to pick up a 4-string practice bass, and here's what I've found so far:

1) I really want a Fender American Jazz....they go for $1200 or so (see previous post of my current favorite, the Geddy Lee Jazz).
2) There's a guy on EBay that sells Fender Jazz bass kits for about $700....all genuine Fender American parts.  About half the cost but you only get a box of parts you have to assemble yourself (although everything is pre-finished at the Fender factory).
3) I also found Rondo Music (http://www.rondomusic.com/bassguitars4.html), importers of Chinese Jazz Bass clones from SX Instruments (http://www.sxbasses.com/).  Alder bodies, maple necks: from all of the reviews I have read on the net, these are really nice, despite the rock bottom prices.  I am actually considering buying two of them and keeping the second just for parts!

My Peavey Foundation is actually pretty nice...but the stock pickups are shit and there's no direct replacements (they are soapbar-type of a very odd size), and getting replacements and redoing a pickguard to cover up the existing holes would cost more than just getting a beater SX.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 21, 2009, 09:40:38 AM
I've heard of Rondo.. I wished I had jumped on that a little earlier. I remember a couple of years ago they were doing nice LP clones, but I think Gibson has required other companies to not directly copy the LP shape these days.


I had a Jazz for awhile, but I think I prefer just a plain old P-Bass now. Hell, I'd do with a cheap model. Any bass would be nice. I'm not too picky about them like I am guitars, where I'm downright OCD. I just require a good neck.. I'm usually weary of anything too cheap because it's hit or miss there, but I heard the Rondo models are fine.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 22, 2009, 06:17:57 AM
I had a Jazz for awhile, but I think I prefer just a plain old P-Bass now. Hell, I'd do with a cheap model. Any bass would be nice. I'm not too picky about them like I am guitars, where I'm downright OCD. I just require a good neck.. I'm usually weary of anything too cheap because it's hit or miss there, but I heard the Rondo models are fine.

I definately prefer my precision to my jazz.  I'm starting to think that I should eBay my Jazz because I rarely pick it up any more.  Maybe it's time to buy that alembic I've been looking at.

Necks are very much the player's preference.  If I could get precision tone out of an Ibanez, I would have sold my precision for an Ibanez a long time ago.  My hands just love Ibanez and Rick necks.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 22, 2009, 08:00:04 AM
I haven't actually used a lot of basses. When I test drove basses after mine was stolen, it was almost twenty years ago now, heh. So I don't remember my preferences, other than I bought the Edwards for the neck. Iirc, the neck is between a jazz and precision. That's still my bass. My first bass was some kind of old hock shop Peavey, I think it may have been a t-20, massive slab of a body. Between the two I had a loaner Rickenbacker that I FRIGGIN LOVED but didn't have enough upper register for our music (there were parts I had written for fingerpicked guitar that I emulated high on the neck when the guitarist took a solo).

I wish I had more time to get back into the bass, it's a wicked fun instrument to play. But I barely have time to play guitar!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 22, 2009, 08:27:17 AM
I wish I had more time to get back into the bass, it's a wicked fun instrument to play. But I barely have time to play guitar!

If you sucked at guitar like I do, you'd be playing your bass more. 

You've also given me Rick fever.  I really love those bases, but the double truss necks could sometimes be high maintenence. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 22, 2009, 11:07:35 AM
Quote
I definately prefer my precision to my jazz.

What is it that you prefer?  The playability?  The tone? The look?

I really like aggressive, growly bass tones, and the more aggressive bass tones I have heard all come from Jazzes....here's two examples:

http://www.lizzydaymont.com/sounds/Bass-Drums2.mp3 (http://www.lizzydaymont.com/sounds/Bass-Drums2.mp3)
http://www.danatkinson.net/audio/sx_upgrade.mp3 (http://www.danatkinson.net/audio/sx_upgrade.mp3)

When I think of P-bass tone, I think less growl, more fat lows and highs - a woodier, more high-fi tone:

http://www.lakland.com/multimedia/audio/glaub/10%20glaub_hardrock_rounds.mp3 (http://www.lakland.com/multimedia/audio/glaub/10%20glaub_hardrock_rounds.mp3)

Anyone got some good examples of P-bass and J-bass tones?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 22, 2009, 11:56:12 AM
P-bass: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgqxQmAbTBc (my triplet practice song when I was in the band, play this about 10 times in a row, or for a few minutes after your hand melts, can't believe Harris plays it with two fingers!)

J-bass: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1lWK4PvIAw

Actually, those guys have very similar live sounds, very punchy and crisp but with good low end. SO I dunno, just posting cool stuff for fun!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 22, 2009, 02:46:32 PM
I had a Jazz for awhile, but I think I prefer just a plain old P-Bass now. Hell, I'd do with a cheap model. Any bass would be nice. I'm not too picky about them like I am guitars, where I'm downright OCD. I just require a good neck.. I'm usually weary of anything too cheap because it's hit or miss there, but I heard the Rondo models are fine.

I definately prefer my precision to my jazz.  I'm starting to think that I should eBay my Jazz because I rarely pick it up any more.  Maybe it's time to buy that alembic I've been looking at.

Necks are very much the player's preference.  If I could get precision tone out of an Ibanez, I would have sold my precision for an Ibanez a long time ago.  My hands just love Ibanez and Rick necks.  

See, I don't even mean that when I say I require a good neck!  :grin:

I mean, all basses are fine with me, so long as the neck is sturdy. That's the only thing that sucks about cheap basses, although there are some decent ones. The reason why I like the P-bass though is that it's no frills, simple controls, and I like the look I guess. Plain white with black pickguard.. that's always been a sweet looking instrument, simple as it is. If there's anything else I'd prefer on the neck, I like a worn down or sanded feel.

Agreed on Steve Harris.. Umm, I like the Queen bassist. Hell, early Police. Clash.. They're all pretty similar in a way.. like classic P-Bass sounds there, albeit different genres of course.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 26, 2009, 07:39:20 AM
Jason Becker (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z1vn1QAhV4). Never heard of him before. I hate shredder albums, but I'm blown away. I was pointed to a Marty Friedman album with him, but it's Becker that's catching me. Just doesn't seem "badly" wanky to me at all... Cool melodies, thrashy.. and wanky in a way that's just cooler than everyone else.

I feel bad for the guy. He made that album above when he was only 17! He barely was in the scene and ended up getting Lou Gehrigs disease. I'm downloading tracks to listen to, but it sucks.. I should buy his shit. I read an interview where he just came off all cynical.. Like the interviewer asked him a question: "Your listed as one of the greatest guitarists of all time. How do you feel about that?"

"I think it's sweet, but I don't sell shit. I can't perform, so the records are the only way for income, but no one buys the shit."


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 26, 2009, 04:33:24 PM
I have a new word for what constitutes a great guitarist. "Belligerent".  :awesome_for_real: Or rather, belligerent with chops.

There's something that makes a lame guitarist lame, no matter how skilled they are: They're too "polite". Great guitarists are rude. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu6mi5-5Flw) (fuck! I love how that crowd doesn't even cheer at the end  :grin:). Even when laying down beautiful softer tunes, they'd spaz out eventually (Diary of a Madman being a fine example (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiEJOzAVAXc)). I think EVH used to be rude, but now he's just another pussy. He relied on so many belligerent gimmicks back in the day, so it makes it extra sad. Heh...

I hate to name all of the "polite" guitarists on my shitlist though. I don't think the good ones had some magical "it", or that they're just more creative. In many cases, they are not more creative. Nor are the good ones the ones "playing from their heart". I think many do.. these pussies play from their heart too. That's why the shit sucks so bad.

edit: needs a live "diary of a madman"... I'm sure it'd be extra belligerent. anyone know of a good one? randy's so much better live.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 28, 2009, 06:57:29 AM
I disagree with what you said.

Anyway, got an amazon gift certificate from my credit card points, so mini buying spree time. Been playing some more renaissance, baroque and romance kind of stuff, thus the focus of the list:

The Francisco Tarrega Collection (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0793560527) - Francisco is my man right now. Bach will always be my all-time favorite, but he doesn't mind me cheating on him. Comes with a CD, which is nice, fiancee tried to steal the CD, she's been loving the Tarrega pieces I've been working on.

Classical Guitar 2000 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0874876818) - Technique book in notation (blah). Pairing this with my flamenco book to try to  find my way through some of the technical passages when my informal technique just isn't cutting it.

The Library of Easy Classical Guitar Solos (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0825635047) - Saw this one in B&N last week, same author of the book that got me on my current composer kick so I'm used to some of his transcription quirks. Easy refers to classical skill level, if you're not a trained classical guitarist, they ain't easy :) This one is huge and has a nice span of time covered.

Pumping Nylon in Tab (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882848356) - Technique book in Tab (yay!). Speaking of belligerence, I've become even more incorrigibly a 'tabtard' since reading a book on the history of guitar and seeing the old lute music written in tablature. Both have their place, I prefer a page printed with both, tab for fingering and standard for timing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on October 28, 2009, 07:17:39 AM
I don't mean belligerence in the sense of "hard" or "distortion" btw. Not something so superficial. A guy ripping up on an acoustic can be belligerent. Plenty of bluesman with few skills could too. Great classical performances are full of this energy. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZRbko3UsnQ)

[edit] I wish I could put it in a clearer way. Maybe it's intangible. I don't know.. maybe there's a time to not a make a powerful statement.

What sparked off my rant though is seeing some prog players - with great skill btw - NOT DO A SINGLE FUCKING THING FOR ME. I'm trying so hard to find it, and it's not there. Maybe it's subjective, but maybe.. just maybe.. it's just for pussies. I'm a little insulted when someone tells me I'm going to hear one of the "great metal guitarists of all time", and he ends up sounding as tame as UB40.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 01, 2009, 09:50:28 PM
I did a two hour+ concert on Metaplace. I have posted the recording of it here:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2009/11/01/the-sunday-concert-halloween/

It's like a 200MB file...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 02, 2009, 07:02:06 AM
It's like a 200MB file...
:ye_gods:

Just saw Derek Trucks last night from the third row. That band is so ridiculous, Derek is some kind of musical freak. His playing is just so good and so different from the way most people approach the guitar. Kofi is also amazing, as is Mike, I don't think Mike gets enough credit because it's an 'instrumental' band. He's such an amazing soul singer. But I mostly ended up just watching the drums, once again proving I'm just a frustrated drummer :)

Local band Los Blancos (http://www.casablancos.com/) opened, they're also a great band. Good to see the locals get a good gig like that. They closed with a great cover of one of my favorite Muddy tunes, Can't Be Satisfied. Picked up a couple nice chord changes to work on in open G, but it kinda sucks because I'm in full-on classical mode right now, not really been practicing anything else.

Derek plays in open E which is a foreign land to me, so I tried to absorb more his single-string legato stuff and of course his ridiculous slide technique. His right hand is a nice mishmash of style, there's a certain latin style it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 02, 2009, 08:03:42 AM
Well open E is just like D of course.. Just feels more old school blues-y to me for some reason.

I was introduced to open E by this Stones song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xle0kTH-cIA). Had to learn it instantly. Fun little jam, but pretty easy to play if you're interested.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 02, 2009, 11:11:35 AM
I posted a ZIP of the show with the songs as individual MP3s. Same linked post, it's just an edit there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 13, 2009, 06:49:19 AM
Splitting this from the general music thread because they don't care:
I think it's the difference between Beethoven and Mozart.  I tend to be more of a minimalist when it comes to guitar.  I love Clapton and Gilmour while Vai and Satriana give me a headache.  I appreciate Setzer, but he tries too hard to fit Rockabilly into everything.  His new album sounds like a bunch of 50's detective show themes.  Great concept, but still too much guitar work for my tastes.  For me it's the difference in balancing melodic and technical.  I prefer the melodic end. 
Eh...I don't like Vai or Satriani :) I feel Setzer is a great example of putting technical guitar playing into a melodic setting that fits in well with the music. Not sure about the forced rockabilly thing, I think he's pretty good at several genres, if anything his rockabilly was too jazzy :) I've only seen him once, but it was like watching three bands play: a big swing band, a rockabilly trio, and a gypsy jazz band.

As for balance, that's where guys like Warren Haynes shine, something you don't see in guys who don't sublimate. I don't know that Vai or Satriani know how to take a back seat and play an interesting support role for another soloist. Listening to someone like Setzer or Haynes play rhythm guitar is a lesson in itself.

We saw Gregg Allman last night with his "solo" band. They were wicked, though the guitarist was a bit too clean and jazzy for my taste and only got into his groove when he was overplaying. It really showed what guys like Haynes bring to the table with a well-rounded approach. No guitar pick, though, stingy! I let the milf in the next seat get the set list from the horn player, but the road crew and security were dickheads.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 13, 2009, 07:43:41 AM
Splitting this from the general music thread because they don't care:
I think it's the difference between Beethoven and Mozart.  I tend to be more of a minimalist when it comes to guitar.  I love Clapton and Gilmour while Vai and Satriana give me a headache.  I appreciate Setzer, but he tries too hard to fit Rockabilly into everything.  His new album sounds like a bunch of 50's detective show themes.  Great concept, but still too much guitar work for my tastes.  For me it's the difference in balancing melodic and technical.  I prefer the melodic end.  
Eh...I don't like Vai or Satriani :) I feel Setzer is a great example of putting technical guitar playing into a melodic setting that fits in well with the music. Not sure about the forced rockabilly thing, I think he's pretty good at several genres, if anything his rockabilly was too jazzy :) I've only seen him once, but it was like watching three bands play: a big swing band, a rockabilly trio, and a gypsy jazz band.

This.. Yes, he's seriously jazzy. Rockabilly does have some roots in a country swing jazziness, but he takes it into boppy jazz at times. Or like you said, gypsy jazz. That's what sets him apart though. As good as say, the Rev is, he's a joke compared to Setzer. Maybe equals on the songwriting level though..


I've come to appreciate Satriani and Vai over time. Especially Satriani.. That shredder I mentioned somewhere above though (Jason Becker.. the one living with Lou Gehrig's now?) is just amazing. He's immobile now, but still composes --- with his eyes using some computer device..

I think it's pretty cool that Vai records the guitar parts for him. But it shows how well Becker plays with his head rather than his hands. His older tunes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGzGPSN_9cU) when he could play had an appeal above the typical shredder for the same reason, I think.

[edit] You know, the other thing that makes some shredders appealing to me is that the best have a "Thrash" background in a way. You can get me to agree with you all day when it comes to the shittyness of shred albums. They're very sterile. Yet OTOH, the two kings of shred - Rhoads and EVH were thrashy. Dimebag was also very thrashy. Zakk is thrashy.. Our favorite Metallica and Maiden shit was thrashy. Blackmore - pretty thrashy. This guy Becker was thrashy. So maybe it's not that I have a problem with indulgence or virtuousic neo-classicism in shredding.. or whatever!... It's just that the typical shredder simply has no attitude, and produces his albums in a shitty elevator music kind of way.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 13, 2009, 08:11:58 AM
Since my band started as thrash band and I was the lead guitarist, I agree. :)

We were just talking about technicality last night after the Allman show, with the guitarist who overplayed a lot. Speed and technicality are an accent. I love chocolate cake, but I don't want it for every meal every day.

Take everything I say with a grain of salt (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iacZDoXaVQ), of course. Not that I really play like that anymore :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 13, 2009, 08:21:19 AM
Shredding just gives me a headache.  If you want to be technical, at least do it in an interesting mode.  Steve Howe is a great example of making a technical playstyle interesting.  Again, just a personal taste thing.  One of my favorite guitar solos of all time is from Comfortably Numb.  I still get a chill every time I hear it.  All feel and tone. 



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 13, 2009, 08:25:27 AM
Not that I really play like that anymore :)

Heh.. Why not? :P

I wonder if you're like my friend and just let your "shred" die off on purpose? He used to be so good at it, much better than me in highschool.. and then he just chilled.. He usually introduces me to people as the "guitar player"/wants me to play for people. I'm like wtf.. He used to walk in circles around me.


Since I'm mentioning Becker, I'll let y'all suffer through another tune (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtjOe5e9VFA). I hope that doesn't give a headache.. It's just beautiful, and shows how advanced he is. I think it's pretty great for being a modern, original piece too.

On a completely silly note, I always have these stupid thoughts of what it'd be like if I was Bill or Ted and brought Beethoven back. Who would I turn him on to? I think I'd play Jason Becker now.. I think he'd hate the majority of shred though too.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 13, 2009, 08:59:52 AM
It just doesn't fit the music I'm playing now. I really should practice it at least once a week just to keep the chops up.

Since I've been doing the classical thing, I've been finding a few occasions to throw in some runs as I learn the pieces a bit better and see where they fit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 13, 2009, 09:42:45 AM
Well, smoke em if you got em.  :awesome_for_real: I think it'd be easy to throw it all in together, if I knew how to both shred and played classical. Natural fit. I mean, it's not easy to me - but if I knew them both, it'd be. Err, hope I make sense...

Anyways, I'm rediscovering the appeal of classical with electrics.. You know, I never noticed it before, but I wonder why so many guitarists went the EVH route in the 80's, with the trem equipped flat fretboards etc.. Yet, they dropped Randy's name a lot -- except he played an LP. And if he used the Jackson, it doesn't seem like he incorporated trem mechanics much. He was just a fretboard guy, with a bulky guitar at that. Really different.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 13, 2009, 10:11:08 AM
My classical playing is almost entirely on the Baby. That thing sounds better than any $250 guitar has a right to. The decay and harmonics are ridiculous. Only downside is I'm probably cramping myself a bit with the small fretboard if I ever can afford moving up to a nylon taylor (WHEN NOT IF, heh)

Been focusing on Carcassi the last couple days, and trying to get down sight reading tab while also watching the standard notation for time. Both have gotten much better in the last couple weeks, so much that I'm tempted to actually tackle sight reading standard notation itself. Though I still feel the combination of both is superior overall, standard lacks fingering info and tab lacks time notation.

Some day I'll be a decent guitar player.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on November 13, 2009, 05:08:15 PM
Heh.. Why not? :P
My biggest problem is it makes me have a hard time playing slower songs ;-)  I don't care too much for slower stuff, so I don't play it.  But when I do, it's serious work for me compared to the speed\shred\thrashy styles.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on November 18, 2009, 11:55:18 AM
Any advice on a good acoustic to learn and grow with?  Heavy emphasis on comfort, playability and value.  I was thinking of getting an Ovation CC24 (http://www.amazon.com/Ovation-Celebrity-Cutaway-Acoustic-Electric/dp/B000E4IYUU/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=musical-instruments&qid=1258573100&sr=8-6) but $350 is about the max I want to spend.  I looked at the CC28 as well but am afraid if the body is too shallow it will sacrifice a bit too much on the sound.

Being in Austin there is also a plethora of used equipment for sale, unfortunately the wife will be buying it for me and I am not sure if she has the eye for detail that is needed when purchasing used equipment.

I did have an electric like 20 years ago but pawned it shortly after about a year, pawning that thing was a huge mistake I have never found another like it and I loved the way it sound and felt.  I sort of wanted to go with another electric (easier on the fingers) but I don't want the hassle of an amp and cords.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 18, 2009, 12:40:54 PM
You don't need to plug an electric in :) Ovations are good guitars, but I personally dislike them. It's an 80s thing.

You should buy it and pretend she did. Srsly. I wouldn't even buy something online, I need to put hands on and play it for a while before making that decision.

I have a $400 Alvarez that I thought was ok until I played my $250 mahogany Baby Taylor. (http://www.amazon.com/Taylor-Guitars-BT2-Mahogany-Natural/dp/B001R2R11Q) I bought mine locally, so the price was better and I put in time playing it in the store before buying. I can't say enough about how great it sounds, almost freakishly so.

What kinds of hands do you have? Mine are on the small side, so the short scale and thin neck doesn't bother me and it sounds amazing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on November 18, 2009, 01:59:00 PM
Med to Large hands (more on the large side).  The review on that link said this isn't a good 1st guitar (I'm assuming because of the scaled down fret board).  Seeing how it's been 20 years and even then my experience level was pretty much limited to being able to butcher ride the lightening so for practical reasons I would classify this as my 1st/learning to play guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 19, 2009, 07:00:32 AM
Go to a music store and try one out, most decent stores should stock Taylors, the Babies sell very well. It will probably be too small, but I'm not sure you'll find an acoustic that sounds that good in the price range, so it might be worth checking out.

Anyway, go to a music store and spend a few hours playing every guitar there. Only way to decide, it's different for everyone. Take the wife if she's intent on buying it herself so she can hear each one. My fiancee knew exactly which guitar I should get, as did everyone in the shop (my SG, I had intended to buy a Strat).

Also, if you're uncomfortable with your skill level and playing in a shop, the acoustics are usually in a seperate room :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 19, 2009, 07:05:13 AM
I have a Tacoma and love it, but they start a bit higher in price.  If you're wanting a dreadnought in size and also want a pickup in your acoustic, I've found Washburn guitars to be a lot of instrument for the money.  Acoustic Guitar magazine routinely rates them as a best buy under $500.

Check out Zzounds.  (http://www.zzounds.com/item--WASD10S)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 26, 2009, 01:14:41 PM
I'm doing it again! From 2-4pm Pacific tomorrow (Black Friday) I'm playing a live 2 hour acoustic set on Metaplace.

http://www.metaplace.com/TheStage/play is the direct link.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 27, 2009, 01:07:05 PM
Telling you guys... Just play a Seagull. It won't kill you. Be it beginner or expert, they are hard to top in price/value. They are every bit as good as a baby taylor (in their own way), but at full sizes. And the affordable models are every bit as good as Martin's "cheaper" line (which are still a bit more). The only caveat is that most are constructed with slightly wider necks, but to me, that's a good thing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 27, 2009, 07:08:18 PM
In that price range, I second Seagull. Also try some Washburns and Yamahas. You can often find nice ones in pawn shops too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on November 29, 2009, 03:42:07 PM
I put together a short MP3 demo of my new Rondo/SX Jazz bass.  It's a clone of a 75 Fender, but I removed
the ash try covers over the pickups and bridge (this one is very similar (http://www.rondomusic.com/product932.html)).

Drums are the Native Instruments Battery Pop Kit with overhead and room mic samples.  No effects, no EQ, bass goes direct into my Sansamp Bass RBI then to my M-Audio Fast Track Ultra.

Bass / Drum Demo (http://69.181.170.82/mp3/Bass_Demo.mp3)

I really like the barky, growly tone I can get out of this thing, and it cost $150!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 30, 2009, 07:40:17 AM
Funky! Nice sounds for $150, no doubt.

But I still despise fake drums with a burning hatred.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2009, 11:11:00 AM
If you really want to see where you are, record.

While I can sit and wail away blues or metal for hours, this classical shit is killin' me. Thought I had a couple pieces down, but the perfection required by the material + my own natural tendency to perfection (which I loosen up on with blues and smudge with distortion in metal, heh) = fffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Sat last night trying to get something down and almost threw the guitar through the window. Even stuff I've been playing for a couple years now, a missed note here, a poorly barred chord there, a slightly popped note, it's insane how perfect you have to be in every facet when recording classical stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 05, 2009, 12:37:16 PM
I know what you mean.. Even if the slightest mistake while I'm muffling/doing some beat gets me nutty. The classical players can play that well in performance too. I'm not really sure why they're so precise. It can't just be proper "form" can it?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on December 05, 2009, 12:45:41 PM
I'm not really sure why they're so precise. It can't just be proper "form" can it?
My guitar instructor was a classical guitarist.  He stressed proper form just as a means of preventing bad habits and being able to take it to the next level.  He said proper form wasn't necessary to be a "good" guitarist if that was what I was after, but if I wanted to be "great" I would need to fix some bad habits and practice form lots.  I changed to suit what he said, and it did make me "better" but I am far from "great" or even "good."  He did mention that he would practice for 7-8 hours per day as if it was a job to ensure that he was on top of his game at all times (performance, practice, etc) because he was getting paid to do so.  He was an interesting guy... said I needed to get laid to loosen up and relax more.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2009, 02:39:18 PM
Yeah, when I was doing it for a living I was practicing at least 7 hours a day and then when I was in school it was more like 10 minimum, between school, homework, personal practice and band rehearsal and performance. It was insane, but musically one of the highlights of my life, living music with everyone around you.

Most of that period I was on bass, though  :oh_i_see:

I have begun cleaning up my form and posture, some of the old method books (so far I'm preferring Carcassi over Sor) are amazing for technique, even without an instructor. I've changed several fingerings, though it's tough to remove over twenty years of muscle memory.

But in the end, that's one of the things I love about music and the guitar. No matter how good you get, you're never good enough. Maybe the top handful of guitarists who have been lucky enough to have good genetics, talent, dedication, and the time to invest can see the pinnacle. But to be a pretty damned decent guitar player and still be crappy in the grand scheme of things says volumes about the depth of the art.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 06, 2009, 10:13:29 AM
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/TakeOnMe.mp3

Yes, THAT Take On Me. Heh. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on December 06, 2009, 03:13:23 PM
Selby is right on the money or his teacher was, it really allows a lot more freedom of movement and likely a lot less stress on the hands/wrists/arms if you maintain good posture.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBE3C3IG46g (shameless plug of an old school friend of mine)

This position totally makes sense when you think about it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 20, 2009, 11:57:55 AM
http://www.raphkoster.com/2009/12/20/the-sunday-song-holidays/

Direct MP3 link: http://www.raphkoster.com/music/Holidays.mp3

I put some rough tab there this time. Open D.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 20, 2009, 07:33:36 PM
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/TakeOnMe.mp3

Yes, THAT Take On Me. Heh. :)

Nice arrangement. I might have to borrow it  :grin:



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 23, 2009, 12:02:32 AM
You want the chord chart?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 23, 2009, 12:06:57 AM
Sure, saves me trouble. My acoustic string's are broke though, and I'm lazy atm. Might not get around to it yet.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 27, 2009, 11:21:38 AM
Opening riff is basically the verse part. You can pick out the melody right on the Bm to E part, then on the high E string go 4-5-7 while plucking just the bass note. The A is just on the chord, and the melody on the D is just a D to D2.

Verse is like this. I play them all in root position, but at Capo IV. Capo whatever gets you the vocal range. :)

Bm        E    A                 D     
Talking away,  I don’t know what I’m to say
Bm               E   A              D     
I’ll say it anyway,Today’s another day to find you
Bm      E    F#m                      D   
Shine away, I’ll be coming for your love OK

Chorus is like this. For the vibe I was going for, when singing, I usually didn't play the G# bass on the E, and I fingered the F#m as 2xx222. When playing it instrumentally, I fingered all four chords off a barre on the 2nd fret, so

x0222x x02454 x4422x xxx232

A   E/G#  F#m  D
Take on me  (take on me) (2x)
A   E/G#  F#m  D
I’ll be gone
           A  E/G# F#m D
in a day or two

Chorus

Instrumental break is C#m G, repeated, then Bm E, then the verse, then the chorus.

Now, of course, you are obligated to post a recording, when you get to it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 28, 2009, 09:22:58 PM
Xmas present from my mom, a Venezuelan cuatro. Cedar body, jacaranda neck, hard case.

Turns out it is tuned low-to-high A-D-F#-B, which means it is fingered exactly like a guitar or my bari uke even though the tuning is re-entrant (the B is not higher than the F# -- it's down by the A again). Meant to be strummed madly though, this sort of thing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BsjejU6bWE -- a song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=db7SHs758Hs -- strumming techniques



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on December 30, 2009, 08:18:35 AM
Hey thanks.. More basic than I thought.

I don't know if I'll get around to recording anytime soon. I don't have the equipment atm. I'm playing it in Drop C though. Heh. Not really working out well.. Trying to give the main melody a heavy punk feel.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on January 06, 2010, 04:06:23 PM
Ramble ahead So I guess the point of that ramble was "used to play, stopped, getting back into it"

It was suggested to me to get an Mbox2 http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?itemid=4893
 and to pay for the full upgrade to my trial version of Ableton Live http://www.ableton.com/

These recommendations are coming from my younger brother who is a fairly serious electronica "musician".   I have read articles and reviews and yeah they both sound great.   But is it a bit overkill for a guy who just wants to basically make primitive industrial music (early godflesh and pitchshifter)?   I can see the Mbox 2 but my Cakewalk audio certainly still works.

So my real question is: what software do you folks use when you are recording your guitars?  Any experience with Ableton Live, and if so is it truely the bees knees?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2010, 05:37:04 PM
Ableton is performance/real time oriented, but for general recording, it simplifies workflow to just get your ideas down quickly (which is related to being Live oriented). If you really wanted it, I think you could skip the mbox and get something from m-audio instead (they bundle some version of Live last I checked). The mbox comes with ProTools, which is strictly a composing tool - but it's robust, industry standard, and every plug-in under the sun is made for it. Also, if you wanted to screw around with Live later, it can interface with ProTools.

What do I do? I used to have an old Mac with a nice (for the time) ProTools setup, but I haven't had shit for years. Honestly, if I want to record, I just lay down some idea through my webcam mic and record in Garage Band.  :why_so_serious: Really, I should spend some money, but I guess I'm not into it these days.

That said, look at m-audio for a Live bundle


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 07, 2010, 06:52:51 AM
I don't use computers to record. Some day I hope to use something to put things back together.

I use a Fostex MR8HD (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product?sku=240341V) to record, it's wicked. 4 live simultaneous tracks with phantom XLRs or 1/4" DIs and 4 more tracks to bounce down. If I were to buy one again, I'd get the 16 track version (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR16HD-16Track-Digital-Recorder?sku=701051). I like knobs, I learned to record back in the old days with mixing desks.

If you really want to use the computer, go with what Stray is saying. Don't get an mbox unless you want to use ProTools. If I were to do it, I'd go for a digi003 :) I use Shure mics for recording, a SM57 for the guitar and SM58 for vox.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on January 07, 2010, 12:50:24 PM
Thanks for the feedback, appreciate it.   I think I will stick with Cakewalk for now and pick up a Lexicon Omega http://www.lexiconpro.com/product.php?id=6  for use along with my trusty Shure sm57.  My brother has  the lexicon omega and it is cheap and I already have used it a bit.

My brother gave me a Blue Snowball usb mic for Xmas.  Haven't really had time to play with it, but I like the idea.
http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Microphones-Snowball-Microphone-Bundle/dp/B001THR8K8

cheers


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 07, 2010, 12:52:39 PM
Can't go wrong with the 57's  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on January 08, 2010, 01:53:27 PM
Don't listen to Sky: next thing he'll be telling you is that you can only record on reel-to-reel machines and you have to do your overdubs with a razor blade and acetate glue.  :geezer:

In all seriousness, what do you want to spend on your interface?  I assume you need mic pre's?  How many mic's do you want to record simultaneously?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on January 09, 2010, 07:52:06 PM
Don't listen to Sky: next thing he'll be telling you is that you can only record on reel-to-reel machines and you have to do your overdubs with a razor blade and acetate glue.  :geezer:

In all seriousness, what do you want to spend on your interface?  I assume you need mic pre's?  How many mic's do you want to record simultaneously?

Well my drum set is in California and now that I am in an Apt. in new mexico I don't see needing that many mics any time soon.  I just bought the lexicon omega pro new for $160 it is what my brother uses and I have used it a bit.  For what I will be doing this should be plenty.   I will be recording guitar, and random screams and shouts which I will try and pass off for singing.  Once I have a house here, I will see about getting my drumset out here. In the meantime, unlike Sky, I have zero issues with using drum machines.  Godflesh and Ghengis Tron are two bands that come to mind that have made amazing music just using drum machines (Ghengis tron has recorded all their albums using Ableton live btw)

Ableton is having a huge sale until jan 15 http://www.ableton.com/nl495-able10-discounts
I thought about it for a bit and said f'it and bought the upgrade from Ableton lite to the Ableton 8 full suite which is normally has a fairly hefty price tag but with the reduced upgrade price was worth it for me.  My brother uses Ableton live and our *hope* is that this will make collabrating much easier given that we will be using the exact same software.  Ableton also has a new utility specifically for collaborating, basically an export feature that exports the midi, audio, samples etc all into a file that someone else using ableton can simply open up and begin working on without any fiddling.  So basically we can just bounce projects back and forth to each other on an ftp server.  I am leaving my comfort zone of Cakewalk Audio, but I think this will be worth it.

Next up for me is buying a drum pad and eventually a midi trigger.  Looking at:

Korg http://www.zzounds.com/item--KORPADKONTROL
Akai Akai Professional APC40 http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/APC40/?gclid=CMOjgdvqmJ8CFQchDQodoxV6yQ

and dunno just need a cheap keyboard with mid out for triggers


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 10, 2010, 12:06:28 PM
Yeah, I've really got to get my kit set up in the basement. Hopefully it stays dry this spring, then I'll put in a small riser for it. Some day I hope to get a real kit, only my bass pedal and my two cymbals (crash/ride and high-hats, they're $$ ffs) are decent. Need new heads and a throne at the very least.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on January 10, 2010, 02:50:58 PM
Quote
Well my drum set is in California

For recording of the things you mentioned, I would forget the SM57 and SM58 and go for a pair of these:

Cascade Fat Head Ribbon Mic (http://www.cascademicrophones.com/cascade_FAT%20HEAD.html)

$325 for a matched pair.  These are by far the best overhead mic's I have ever heard on drums (for the price), and they are wonderful on voice and guitar as well.

You could also go with a pair of X-M Omni's (http://www.naiant.com/studiostore/microphones.html) which I have heard are really good for the $$ as well, but I don't have personal experience with them as I do the Cascades.

57's make decent snare mics, but the drum sound is all about the room and the kit as a whole. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on January 10, 2010, 03:02:14 PM
it makes me sad just how much more money drumming seems to cost.   I was very lucky I had a good friend in undergrad who had a huge Tama Rockstar drum set, double bass, two floor toms, rack for cymbals the thing was huge. He got sick of the amount of time to set it up and break it down for gigs so basically he split it in half and sold me two toms, floor tom, bass, and some stands for a silly low price.  Already had a slingerland knockoff snare, HH, and some other hardware... so all in all I got a decent set for a steal.  But the cost to replace all the heads (which I really need to do) definately comes with some sticker shock when you compare it to a set of 6 dollar guitar strings. 

Just before I moved to NM I bought an Iron Cobra twin double bass peddle with dreams of heavy metal double bass madness  :drill:  The reality of my double bass metal godhood was a bit more along the lines of  :roffle:  hmm there isn't an emiticon for "hey I suck"


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on January 10, 2010, 03:03:35 PM
Quote
Well my drum set is in California

For recording of the things you mentioned, I would forget the SM57 and SM58 and go for a pair of these:

Cascade Fat Head Ribbon Mic (http://www.cascademicrophones.com/cascade_FAT%20HEAD.html)

$325 for a matched pair.  These are by far the best overhead mic's I have ever heard on drums (for the price), and they are wonderful on voice and guitar as well.

You could also go with a pair of X-M Omni's (http://www.naiant.com/studiostore/microphones.html) which I have heard are really good for the $$ as well, but I don't have personal experience with them as I do the Cascades.

57's make decent snare mics, but the drum sound is all about the room and the kit as a whole. 

Thanks for the feedback I will definately look into those once I get into a house and have my set with me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 11, 2010, 06:28:46 AM
it makes me sad just how much more money drumming seems to cost. 
When you're not a gigging musician, it's much tougher, because now I'm out of the loop for deals. When my stuff got robbed (some by a former band member  :oh_i_see:), a couple local bassist kicked in with some of their b-line gear. I got an ampeg 8x10 for $100 and a crappy peavey mk3 head on top of a nice dean markley cab loaded with an evmb 400w (my speaker of choice in the day) for another $100. My current drum kit I got from a coworker about fifteen years ago (heh), paid $100 for the kit and broke the pedal a day later. I forget what I paid for the pedal, it's nothing special but cost me more than the kit. The heads on it are a joke, dented to fuck.

I did get a decent Tama cymbal stand from a hock shop about ten years ago, but haven't found a cymbal for it. That hock shop was the last of the true hock shops, run by the same old lady who could haggle better than a mexican open air market vendor, but you could find some real deals there (like the original BC Rich Bich I missed when I was first starting out). Now hock shops are mostly fences, national chains that shift merchandise out of the hot zone.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on January 11, 2010, 04:06:32 PM
sounds like you got the same Frankenstein thing going that I do with my drums. 

Original Rich Bich? As in you didn't notice it was there in the store ?

There was an amazing store in San Francisco called Black Market Music that was all commission sales.  The owner was a bit sketchy, but you could find some amazing bargains there.  My brothers 60 something or another SG with a repaired neck (cracked headstock) came from there for something like $200, and a several of my cymbals came from there.   As you mention about hock shops.. there was definately some things there at prices low enough to raise eyebrows.   I believe that shop has gone the way of the Dodo


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 11, 2010, 04:34:05 PM
There's one pawn shop here that's vry old school, but it's such a hole in the wall redneck joint that I'm better off finding landscape equipment there than a good guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 12, 2010, 07:33:10 AM
Original Rich Bich? As in you didn't notice it was there in the store ?
I was in Jr High and had no money. Missed it meaning I didn't buy it when I saw it. Like that Taylor nylon cutaway..and Musician's Friend is having a Taylor sale today (phone only). I really, really want to call in to see what the deal is, since that Taylor is the other big miss.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 12, 2010, 08:02:17 AM
When I was very young (12 - 16), I used to do tech work for a specialty music store in downtown Minneapolis.  I had the opportunity to buy so many used instruments and equipment that it now makes me cry.  Pre-CBS Fender stuff (Precisions, Teles, Strats) for a couple hundred bucks, Ampeg, Fender, HiWatt, and Vox tube amps, Gibson and Gretch hollow bodies, you name it.  I look at the price of these things in vintage shops now and it makes me wish I had just bought everything I could back then and tossed it into a vault. 

I feel your pain Sky. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 14, 2010, 04:29:50 PM
Figured out a standard tuning version of Ellis Paul's "Speed of Trees" at like half past midnight last night. Here's his live version of it (skip the interview bit).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSaWVrnXvRI


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 26, 2010, 11:12:33 AM
Got my drums set up in the basement. Tired of sitting on a chair, got the local music shop owner to dig up a throne for me. Depending on how the next couple of months go (read: if I still love playing drums and can improve my right hand a bit), I think I'm going to try and strike a deal with him for a low-end Mapex kit. I've known the guy since I was a kid hanging out bugging the hell out of him in the mid-80s, so prospects are good. I'll probably trade my Alvarez, I just don't play it much since I got the Baby.

Went home for lunch break and played through the first four songs on Hoodoo Man Blues (which should be in absolutely everyone's collection! :)).

Edit: his current location is right next door to the pawn shop that had that BC Rich, heh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 27, 2010, 07:33:09 AM
Oh, mah achin' leg. Still tweaking the positions of the kit, but put in over an hour last night. My right leg was so shot I had to stop, the last half-hour was actually funny with the right leg disobeying me every now and again. Put the ipod on random and skipped through anything uninteresting. Everything from Phantom of the Opera (Maiden, not Broadway!) to Miss Ida B (Buddy Guy) to Come As You Are (Nirvana).

Nirvana was actually tougher because it's so structured, most stuff I have is pretty jammy and you can just fill it in. Dave's stuff is so recognizable while still being pretty basic. Maiden was tough physically, but I grew up on Maiden so the changes and accents were easy. Some Allman Bros stuff was odd because there are two drummers (three now), so multiple parts going on.

Really want to improve my fills, get some good tom action going like a swing drummer. And the omnipresent issue with the right hand time keeping on the cymbals, grr. Some really easy beats are the most difficult because the bass and time keeping cymbal are playing two patterns but my right hand and foot are connected.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 22, 2010, 07:31:13 AM
Thread almost slipping off the 1st page! Are you guys up to anything?

I'm working through some classical stuff ("easy" classical, still brutal at times, and beautiful: Sans, Carcassi, Sor, Tarrega, etc). Did start up with the electric a bit again, because my rock skills are really hurtin'. An old friends band reunited but I couldn't even do justice to their stuff, too much time on the baby last year.

Still putting in time on the drum throne. Finally updated my ipod and tried to play some Mastodon. That drummer is....good. I can't really play near his level, but it's good for the general feel of his fills, which is a massively advanced version of what I try to do, gives me the timing and patterns to work towards.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 22, 2010, 08:17:25 AM
I listened to some live local music on Friday night, but that's about it.  It was sad to watch... the bass player had such a stranglehold on the neck that he always seemed about half a beat behind the rest of the band.  The experience had me thinking about playing in some hack cover band again, but I don't think I have the stomach for it anymore. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 22, 2010, 12:21:32 PM
There's a library patron who is an old dog, played bass mostly but also enjoys guitar; Beatles, Stones, etc. Talked at length with him the other night and might have him over for some jamming and see how it goes. It's such a pita to try and get a real band going, but I'm trying to find a few blokes to hammer out some noise a few nights a month. Now that I have the drums set up and a semi-"band room" going, it could be fun.

Last bassist I jammed with was pretty solid but uncreative at an open mic. Then I went over to his room and things just didn't click. I like older rootsier ballsy blues and he likes modern white guy smooth blues. Bleh. So many factors, even if it sounds good. Wish I had a recording of some Muddy/Buddy stuff we did at the open mic, it fucking ripped. Drunks screaming, women gyrating, good times.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 22, 2010, 03:37:38 PM
Figured out a heretofore-unknown capability of my soundcard with updated ASIO drivers, and now I can record two mono and one stereo track at once (and could probably manage more with more cables). Recorded two old tunes over the weekend, and time to completion was cut in half, which was nice. :)

I only have a backlog of 200-odd songs to record. Should finish by lunchtime tomorrow. :P Yeah right.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on February 22, 2010, 05:57:27 PM
I am wading through learning Ableton Live, bought it while it was on sale, along with a few other goodies like a Korg PadKontrol....  500 page manuals are fun  :oh_i_see:

Something I am very happy about is I took my departed friends guitar into a shop to have it completely rewired, intonation, etc.  It is nothing special just a strat knockoff, but it is a greath thing to have and I feel very happy that his family gave it to me.  Looking forward to playing it when I pick it up on Weds.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on February 23, 2010, 02:27:41 PM
Thread almost slipping off the 1st page! Are you guys up to anything?

I've started working through "A Modern Method For Guitar: Vol I", again.  I've never been too far into that one before stopping for whatever reason.  But damn it, I'm determined to learn how to read music this time.  Also, that book makes me put my fingers into places and positions they are unaccustomed to going, which is cool because otherwise my fingers just go back to the repetitive patterns and licks they are used to.

I also loaned my Baby Taylor to my cousin's kids.  His 9 year old has taken an interest in it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 24, 2010, 06:46:28 AM
But damn it, I'm determined to learn how to read music this time.  
I've recommended a few books along the way in this thread. The book that started opening doors was Fretboard Logic (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-SE-Reasoning-Arpeggios/dp/0962477060/), introduced me to the CAGED method. But the author isn't the best at explaining things or organizing a workbook. Then I discovered Barrett Tagliarino, who excels at that (he's an MI instructor). The first book of his I got was Fretboard Workbook (http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Fretboard-Workbook-Barrett-Tagliarino/dp/0634049011/), which is exactly that. Go through, do the exercises. He lays it out in a good manner, learn the fretboard shapes and patterns. Only thing is he uses a 1-5 naming convention for CAGED and for me, CAGED is easier to remember (because we all learn cowboy chords so early). The next book I got builds off the first one: Chord Tone Soloing (http://www.amazon.com/Chord-Tone-Soloing-Guitarists-Improvising/dp/0634083651/). Highly recommend both of those books unless you've already mastered the fretboard and improvisational soloing (heh).

Now, on to reading music. I've been able to read music since high school, but I'm awful at it. So it's tough for me to find a book that's not too basic but not too advanced. Barrett has published a great theory book (http://www.amazon.com/Music-Theory-Practical-Musicians-Instruction/dp/1423401778/) that seems to be about like most theory books I used in school (my first school theory book was this one (http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Theory-Complete-Self-Instruction-Course/dp/0882842250/)). I haven't worked through it, but given how strong Barrett is at writing workbooks, I'd cautiously recommend it, even so. But the other book I got with that order, Guitar Reading Workbook (http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Reading-Workbook-Barrett-Tagliarino/dp/0980235308/) is a door-opening gem on the level of the first two Barrett books. It's your basic notation reading/light theory book, but the entire thing is structured around the guitar.

I love Modern Method, too. It just seems a bit more dense and tough to work through than Barrett's stuff. I also love good books, so I just get them all and go back and forth :) I think Barrett's is better as a self-instruction book. Leavitt's seems to be more suited to a teacher, especially given the duet examples I think that was his intention.

Quote
Also, that book makes me put my fingers into places and positions they are unaccustomed to going, which is cool because otherwise my fingers just go back to the repetitive patterns and licks they are used to.
That's one reason I'm digging the classical books right now. Even the 'easy' versions have some hairy chord changes, especially when you get to allegretto or faster. It's also helping me read note values, if not pitch. I'm still half-tarded reading tab* but now I can almost sight read the tempo in standard notation.

* Tab is the original and proper notation for fretted instruments and when combined with standard notation for tempo is the best way to convey the composer's intent. I feel like I always have to add this footnote for educated purist assholes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on February 25, 2010, 12:15:05 AM
I love Modern Method, too. It just seems a bit more dense and tough to work through than Barrett's stuff. I also love good books, so I just get them all and go back and forth :) I think Barrett's is better as a self-instruction book. Leavitt's seems to be more suited to a teacher, especially given the duet examples I think that was his intention.

I took lessons a while back and it was one of the books my teacher had me working on.  I don't think I had a good teacher - he was a nice guy and a good musician, but he had me working on too many things at once and I didn't feel like I was making good progress.  I've still got the book and it's supposed to be good, so I'm using it again.  It came with a CD too, so if something is confusing on paper I can resort to using my ear to get the idea of what the notation is trying to tell me.

He also had me get this jazz chord book... "Mel Bay's Rhythm Guitar Chord System" and it's a BITCH.  That damn thing makes my left hand and forearm ache in a bad way, and I'm talking about right from the beginning.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 25, 2010, 06:13:17 AM
Stay away from Pumping Nylon, then  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 03, 2010, 08:11:14 AM
I lasted one day with a teacher a long while back. That's more of a fault of mine than his probably. Just not good with school in general. And not good at teaching myself except by doing/muscle memory/listening. All sensory type of stuff. And most importantly, it all makes me a lousy teacher too :D I don't even want to "talk". I'm all "dude", "put your hands HERE. Don't you hear it???"  :grin:


Eh.. anyways. That probably wasn't relevant.

I'm really torn right now between getting a new laptop or a nice Epi Les Paul I wanted.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 03, 2010, 08:24:52 AM
I'm really torn right now between getting a new laptop or a nice Epi Les Paul I wanted.

Save your money and get either a Les Paul Studio or a Les Paul Standard.  The hardware on the Epi models suffers by comparison (in my humble opinion).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 03, 2010, 08:26:36 AM
Ah, but I can't get a cheaper Gibon Custom in that nice white with gold hardware  :awesome_for_real: I want to be Randy Rhoads you see. The non-flying V version. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRbPWcLode0)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 03, 2010, 08:29:22 AM
Sure you can.  It's just expensive.  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 03, 2010, 08:31:46 AM
You can get well-constructed Epis, just like you can get a crappy Gibby. Imo you always have to put hands on a guitar. If it plays good, you can always drop in new electronics, tuners, etc.

Last time I sat down with a teacher, a couple years ago, I learned I really just need to learn the neck and brush up on theory. A couple years later I've made a bit of progress and saved a ton of money. I really enjoyed our sessions, but I'd rather sit around drinking beer shooting the shit and trading ideas.

I'd like to get a recording or two or the stuff I'm playing right now, but acoustic classical stuff is so brutal to record, the smallest mistake is so pronounced, even a minor misfret or mispluck is just awful. And you know how sloppy my blues recordings were :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 03, 2010, 08:33:56 AM
I've seen high end Epis that were nice, I agree. I've only had one Gibson.. an SG. It was cool too, but probably not worth what I paid for it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on March 05, 2010, 08:04:23 AM
I ended up getting a notebook. maybe i'll figure a way of making this an instrument too. heh. i almost bought a used firebird though. which got me thinking...... why does NO ONE play a firebird? is there something i don't know? always dug the style myself. plus, they're neckthroughs... not sure if gibson makes anything else like it. anyways i would have bought it if the color was better.

[edit] wait johnny winter played one.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Arnold on March 05, 2010, 09:00:02 AM
Warren Haynes plays a Firebird sometimes.  I think he only does that with Gov't Mule though and sticks with Les Pauls for The Allman Brothers.  Nikki Sixx plays a Firebird bass.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 05, 2010, 09:38:25 AM
Last summer when we saw ABB at Canandaigua he was leaning heavily on his ES-335.

I can't wait until some mythical day when the house is in good shape, truck is paid off, and I can start filling out the guitar collection. The next guitar I'll be getting is a Taylor nylon string with a cutaway. Or some Taylor. I love the Baby so much I'd really like to get a full-sized model. I'll probably end up with two, a nylon and a steel, so maybe no need for cutaway on the nylon.

For electrics, eventually I'd like to fill out with a bunch: Tele, Strat, Gretsch, baritone, etc. But the SG is such an amazing guitar I'm pretty much good to go in that department for now.

I'd also like to get a couple new amps, too. Forget the boutique brand I heard a couple years ago that one local guy had just gotten, but it was the best amp I've ever heard, probably could look back through this thread and find it :) Tone...it's so elusive. 90% from the fingers but that 10% is a bitch.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 22, 2010, 07:46:50 AM
Dicked around with some Mercyful Fate on guitar, thanks to the music thread last week. Never learned their stuff back in the day, it was more for inspiration than imitation.

Then I sat down at the drum kit and played some of their stuff  :ye_gods:

Broke my snare head :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 22, 2010, 08:10:47 AM
I've seen high end Epis that were nice, I agree. I've only had one Gibson.. an SG. It was cool too, but probably not worth what I paid for it.

Saw a Gibson Les Paul Studio on Amazon of all places for $789.  It's pretty bare bones, but may be worth a look when you get the money. 

I bought a Schecter S-1 Elite (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/-S1-Elite-Electric-Guitar?sku=518153) on eBay for about $300 and have to say that it has all the sustain I could ever want with a very fast neck for a fraction of the price.  I'm no guitar player, but to my hands and ears this guitar was every bit as good as a LP Studio for my needs.  To be fair, I bought my Schecter from a studio in Cal, so it was modded and setup up in a wonderful way, so that may color my opinion. 

Been playing bass quite a bit lately and am starting to look at replacing some of my pedals with a rack mount, digital effect system.  Is this a mistake?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 22, 2010, 11:20:57 AM
Depends on the pedals and the rack, and how you're playing these days. For recording, rack all the way (do as I say, not as I do!). I used to run a rack and it's very handy, but you need a good foot controller. These days I'm trying to simplify and oddly, that means pedals. More units, but much easier to run. I have a decent Boss GT-6 board, but programming it is  :ye_gods: I just don't have the patience for it, and programming a rack is similar. I like to just twist a couple knobs and stomp on things.

No right or wrong, just depends on preference. And also if you're into boutique stuff, you won't get those sounds out of a multi-effect unit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 22, 2010, 01:45:09 PM
Saw a clip of this song on tv last night (on a rambly and uneven Bill Wyman's Blues Odyssey), lefty plays Robert Johnson on bass. Not the most technical thing but it's pretty cool: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFKxnj5PMvU


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 22, 2010, 03:16:29 PM
Saw a clip of this song on tv last night (on a rambly and uneven Bill Wyman's Blues Odyssey), lefty plays Robert Johnson on bass. Not the most technical thing but it's pretty cool: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFKxnj5PMvU

I'm all for innovative bass stuff (a la Wooten, Pastorious, etc), but it's still a bass.   We already have an instrument that does the whole melodic strumming thing better.  It's called a guitar.

I appreciate the talent that goes into the playing and I don't mean to be an ass.  I do appreciate you posting the youtube link and it was a good watch. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2010, 06:47:13 AM
Jammed with a guy who been coming to the library for a while, he's a few years older and a big Beatles fan (has that violin-style bass and what what). Sat on the drums and he played through a bunch of Beatles tunes on bass. That was fun and he wanted me to drum for him and a couple guitarists that play Beatles  :why_so_serious: (I said no, I'm awful on the drums, but maybe in the future after I've improved).

Switched to guitar and played some blues for a bit. Trying to do some delta blues and he kept speeding them up, damned British invasion people. "You can't play the blues too slow" - Muddy Waters.

Went upstairs with the acoustics and he played some of his songs, the fiancee says he sounds like James Taylor. I'm not a big folk fan, so I just sat back and channeled Warren Haynes playing behind Gregg Allman on their acoustic tour.

Didn't get much done, really, but it was fun to mess around.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 25, 2010, 09:44:46 AM
Funny you mention this.  Since I've lost my taste for MMO's, I've been playing my bass a lot more.  Most nights I spend 30 mins running scales and pentatonics up and down the neck and follow it up with covers from my cd collection.  I've been playing a lot of Beatles, Zeppelin, Rush, and some pop stuff (Duran Duran, Green Day, AC/DC, Kansas, etc.).  Playing some of the old Beatles stuff reminds me of just how good McCartney was in his prime.  He does some cool stuff on Taxman that I struggle to keep up with.  I'm guessing that the guitar style neck of his Hofner helps.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2010, 11:21:17 AM
Taxman was one of the tunes I recognized him playing. We played a bunch and I recognized about half of them. He didn't like my long scale basses, I've always favored a really long scale though the neck isn't too wide, and I like it thin behind the frets. And jumbo frets. His McCartney knock-off was a club neck, thin width but fat behind the frets. Short scale with almost no fret wire, almost like playing a fretless. I had a little trouble with it. He played mine and complained his hands were too small, so we compared and mine are smaller :)

He had a nice Guild acoustic guitar.

Mentioned in the 'what are you playing' thread that I've just not been in the mood for gaming lately. Trying to get back into my theory and fretboard training, the little I've done (out of the books I often mention) has given amazing dividends on every level. Every day at lunch I get at least 10-20 minutes playing Renaissance through Romance pieces from this Jerry Willard book (http://www.amazon.com/Library-Easy-Classical-Guitar-Solos/dp/0825635047). And lounging on the sofa I'll pull out Pumping Nylon (in tab, for now) to utterly defeat my hands. That book is amazing for strength and dexterity. I hate and love it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 25, 2010, 12:53:36 PM
I play a 70's Fender Jazz.  To be honest, I've never liked the feel of the neck as much as either my Rick 4001 or an 80's Ibanez that I used to gig with.  I stick with the fender because it has such wonderfully woody tone that I've never really found anything with the low end that suited me as well.  I also have a deep hatred for active electronics after all of the times I've had a 9V battery die in the middle of a song. 

I may have to take a look at those books.  I'm always looking for new finger training techniques.  I've actually been spending a lot of time on my right hand (my left is much faster than my right) by practicing some pick style finger techniques.  I've been trying to go up and down the strings using a back and forth motion on my first three fingers a la Wooten.  A tip I learned was to use a piece of rubber tubing under the strings near the nut to deaden them and require more force from my fingers to make noise.  It has helped a lot with hand strength, but my speed is still really lacking.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2010, 01:01:25 PM
Playing metal bass pretty much took care of my right hand :) I'm pretty much straight alternating for most stuff (index/middle), with three fingers for triplets and of course pima for any more complex fingerstyle stuff. For triplets I played the Trooper a few times to warm up, though Harris claims he only uses two fingers.

The books I linked are for guitar, though. You might be able to adapt a few things for the bass, but I can't even do the stretches on guitar (like 1st finger 1st fret to 4th finger 7th fret wtfno). I can't even do a boogie in F 1st position.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 25, 2010, 01:06:35 PM
Playing metal bass pretty much took care of my right hand :) I'm pretty much straight alternating for most stuff (index/middle), with three fingers for triplets and of course pima for any more complex fingerstyle stuff. For triplets I played the Trooper a few times to warm up, though Harris claims he only uses two fingers.

I'm 100% certain that you're a better bass player than I ever was.  I just enjoy the challenge of trying to figure things out.  I can emulate many bass players alright, but the guy that gives me fits is still John Paul Jones.  I don't know what it is about his playing, but just when I think I have it down he does something to let me realize that I'm never going to come close to his league.   

I did realize that the books were for guitar.  I've been playing my Tacoma acoustic more as my new girlfriend enjoys singing while I play.  Sadly, playing old standards has shown me how deficient my guitar skills are.  Capo + bar chords ftw!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 26, 2010, 08:36:39 AM
I shocked the guy I just jammed with when I said I never capo. Learn how to play in multiple keys in standard tuning! (Hi Raph!  :why_so_serious:)

I did struggle playing Hootchie Man in A at the open position, I've always played it in E or at the 5th position. It's funny to struggle to play basic things like turnarounds when I'm out of comfortable positions. But it's also good for you.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on March 26, 2010, 10:46:40 AM
I don't capo for key, usually, but for tunings or tone. Cowboy chords on a capo VII just have a certain timbre that you aren't going to easily get with a barre... but most of my capoing these days is for partial capo work.

Been playing more piano than guitar lately, I have to admit.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/Dubious.mp3
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/AfterConferring.mp3


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 31, 2010, 09:35:45 AM
Ell oh ell, the guitarist for that bass player's beatles band just asked me to drum for them. Poor bastards if I'm the best they can dig up. I told him I'm mostly a funk drummer (James Brown, Luther Allison, Son Seals, Jr Walker are some of the most fun stuff to play), so it might work out oddly.

Partly why I want to get in more time on the drums, though. They're a hell of a lot of fun and there are so few good groove drummers. And you just show up to open mics with sticks.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 01, 2010, 07:40:02 AM
Cannibal Corpse - Frantic Disembowelment (Guitar, Bass & Drums only) Studio footage.
 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOb6JSQd-Qw)
 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 01, 2010, 08:21:19 AM
Are you playing in that video? If not, wrong thread   :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 01, 2010, 08:23:34 AM
Oh, sorry, just figured some of you may get a trip out of the finger work. (and Sans vocals, lol)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 01, 2010, 08:35:10 AM
Ah, I see what you did now. I was reading some amazon comments while previewing and album by The Sword. People ding them on actually singing.  :uhrr:

The Sword is pretty awesome, though.

To keep with the thread, I played guitar for an hour last night, wicked fucking loud. Just in the mood to overdrive the shit out of the amp, add some more overdrive and cut loose. This was after I had played drums for two hours straight. Great evening, it's so nice having a little band room in the house. Here's some of the Beatles songs I was feeling more comfortable with on drums:

Come Together
I Want You (She's So Heavy)
You Never Give Me Your Money
Back In The USSR (if it doesn't kill my wrist on the high hat)
Glass Onion
While My Guitar Gently Weeps
Yer Blues
Helter Skelter
Revolution
Taxman
Good Day Sunshine
Drive My Car
Girl
Run For Your Life


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 13, 2010, 08:12:08 AM
Many many many pages ago, someone (can't find it now!) spotted that I have Greg Brown's "Who Woulda Thunk It" in my fakebook and said they'd like to hear me do it.

I did a live streamed show a while back and recorded it, so here it is, warts and all.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/22WhoWouldaThunkIt.mp3


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 13, 2010, 08:46:41 AM
That was nice, Raph. Starting to work with a singer/songwriter type, so getting a bit more of an ear for that kind of thing. Like the vocal harmonizer for the choruses, too.

First rehearsal with the bassist for the Beatles thing tonight. Supposed to be first time playing with the full band friday, but I've got to make a big dinner for family.

Guitar-wise, still mostly playing renaissance through romance from that book I've been mining for a while now. Trying to grow out my nails a bit, not sure I like it (and it never really works out anyway, I'm too rough and break them). I think coming from the bass makes playing with nails feel unnatural compared to a more plucky style. Luckily I'm no purist!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on April 14, 2010, 07:40:09 PM
Many many many pages ago, someone (can't find it now!) spotted that I have Greg Brown's "Who Woulda Thunk It" in my fakebook and said they'd like to hear me do it.

I did a live streamed show a while back and recorded it, so here it is, warts and all.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/22WhoWouldaThunkIt.mp3

Very nice. Thank you.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 15, 2010, 07:10:01 PM
That was nice, Raph. Starting to work with a singer/songwriter type, so getting a bit more of an ear for that kind of thing. Like the vocal harmonizer for the choruses, too.

Glad you two liked it. I have like 50 of that sort of thing recorded from live shows... when I listen to this one, I just go "yikes, keep the tempo steady!!!" Owell.

The harmonizer is a lot of fun. I really came to like it for these purposes.

Usually, I do a lot more guitar work, throw in a solo, that sort of thing.

What are the challenges you find working with a singer/songwriter type, Sky?

Quote
First rehearsal with the bassist for the Beatles thing tonight. Supposed to be first time playing with the full band friday....

how'd that go?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 16, 2010, 07:10:39 AM
Not great, but again...he thought it was awesome. It was very humbling, because I'm used to being good at what I do and the drums are just an odd thing. Also frustrating, because I'm naturally a good drummer, but it exposes a lot of habits I've fallen into in 26 (!) years of guitar/bass playing. I learned I do not count. I key off the drums and vocals, so just playing with a bass player was difficult, and frankly kind of boring and repetitious (not good for the adhd). It's been so long since I was writing with my band that I forgot how many tricks I used to get out of counting, like varying each melody slightly so I could remember where I was in the song. I literally can't just play the same thing over repeatedly, I both get bored and distracted and lose my place.

Anyway, that translates to an odd experience on the drums, since, you know, counting is important there. Maybe it would be better with the full band, but I've been in bands with drummers who keep starting and stopping and I don't want to be that guy. That said, when we're grooving, I lose myself in it and it's a ton of fun, and I'm pretty good. So maybe with some practice and teaching this old dog some old tricks, there might be some possibility in the future. The bassist still wants me to jam with them  :oh_i_see:

Challenges as a guitarist would actually be similar, for slightly different reasons. When I'm jamming on my own stuff I can just kind of meander all over the place and not worry about changes. Dude's got a boatload of songs and fragments, and there's some really cool stuff to work on, but I forgot how much work went into it :) I've spent the last 10 years+ playing totally undisciplined, so I'm uncertain as to whether I want to change that. It's mostly a lazy thing, so I probably should.

I'm still not used to the way you guys sing, so I'm trying not to insert myself into the vocal part at all (Junior Wells would not be a good backing vocalist for James Taylor, for instance). On guitar I mostly try to channel Warren Haynes playing behind Gregg Allman on their acoustic stuff (think Melissa or live at Red Rocks (http://www.store.livenation.com/Product.aspx?cp=13281_16771_268_5453&pc=HADD060902)). He's got one great riff that his old partner hated, but it's soaked in funk even though he didn't plan it that way. I dropped in a funk drum thing behind it and had him play it straight and it took a great turn. That'll probably be one of the first we record, but I'll need a few more mics and a sub-mixer for the drums before we get to that point. I'm just set up for recording myself with my guitar.

Song-wise, I've been playing blues for a while now. While it's a great structure to solo over, trying to remember different changes and solo over them is amazingly different and challenging. It's pushing me back to my study work that I've really slacked off on, but it's also great applicable practice for chord tone soloing. He's kind of a flat singer, so I'm trying to find alternate melodies from the chord structure and pull those out and put them into the lead lines. Maybe have them work back into the vocal when I'm more comfortable interacting with that part, I'm trying not to inject myself into his work too much at this point, which is difficult because I used to do a lot of arranging in my band, nothing is sacred imo. I guess it's tough to submerge the musical ego after so many years of being a leader and then soloist, heh.

Sorry this rambled, it's an interesting (to me, anyway) and humbling time right now, which is good. I'm trying to challenge myself to get more serious and focused on one hand, but also to relax and do whatever strikes my fancy on the other. Don't know if I can balance those two goals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 16, 2010, 11:33:27 AM
As far as the way "us guys" sing... heh. I guess the way I would put it is that in singer-songwriter stuff, lyrics matter. A lot. So when you listen to a lot of the best-produced stuff in this vein, you'll notice that the arrangements leave the vocals front and center so that the story can be told, even if the vocalist isn't all that. It's meant to be actively listened to.

Depending on who the singer-songwriter is, the guitar parts can be either supersimple, or harmonically very complex. And since most singer-songwriters play solo or maybe with one accompanist, you often get '"ill the space" syndrome, where the song itself has been elaborated so much that there's little room for another instrument in the mix.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: penfold on April 17, 2010, 02:43:13 AM
Cannibal Corpse - Frantic Disembowelment (Guitar, Bass & Drums only) Studio footage.
 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOb6JSQd-Qw)
 

That's a clip from the "Making Of"  DVD that came with Wretched Spawn. It's a great DVD, and follows them making the album at an isolated country studio.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 24, 2010, 09:36:35 AM
The harmonizer is a lot of fun. I really came to like it for these purposes.

Is it an EHX Voice box perchance? I was thinking of getting one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 24, 2010, 11:26:58 PM
The harmonizer is a lot of fun. I really came to like it for these purposes.

Is it an EHX Voice box perchance? I was thinking of getting one.

No, it's a Vocalist Live 4.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 25, 2010, 03:24:26 PM
Ah ok the more expensive one, sounds good though.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on May 07, 2010, 11:37:48 AM
Anyone know anything about the new VOX AC30 Customs? I have pre-order on one and I'm looking around for opinions before I finalise.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Soln on May 14, 2010, 09:34:42 AM
via Slashdot today:  Music Notation with HTML5 Canvas (http://0xfe.blogspot.com/2010/05/music-notation-with-html5-canvas.html)

simply extraordinary -- with tab


after years of growing up and then missing OLGA badly, this is very welcome


(yeah I lurk in this thread.  So what?)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 19, 2010, 02:19:26 PM
I don't get it?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on May 30, 2010, 02:29:44 PM
Musical notation drawn with JS calls on a HTML5 canvas.  As opposed to done with ASCII art, which doesn't work very well with standard notation (fine for tab though), or with raster images, which are very space-inefficient.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 01, 2010, 06:11:39 AM
As opposed to done with ASCII art, which doesn't work very well with standard notation (fine for tab though)
I disagree, but I'm a tab snob.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on June 02, 2010, 12:02:48 AM
I actually like the ASCII art version better because then you don't have lines going through 0s making them look like 8s.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 02, 2010, 08:20:44 AM
Summer spree:  I need a versatile guitar head that I can use with a 2 x 12 cab for practice stuff.  Not interested in Marshall unless you think they can give me a variety of tones.  I'd be extra happy of I could also use it with an acoustic and a pickup, but that may be unreasonable. 

Any suggestions on bang for the buck?  Should I just buy an amp instead of a head + cab?   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 02, 2010, 08:30:57 AM
What kind of music, tones, guitars and budget? :)

I'm no expert on amps, I'm just dipping my toes back in with the fender amp I bought a couple years ago. You should probably just take your guitar around to some guitar shops and try some stuff out.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 02, 2010, 08:42:03 AM
What kind of music, tones, guitars and budget? :)

You should probably just take your guitar around to some guitar shops and try some stuff out.

I would, but I'm way too self-conscious. 

I play clean, square wave, phase, flange, echo, compressor... the usual stuff.  Everything from the Beatles to AC/DC. 

Maybe I should just buy an amp with 2x 12 and 2 channels?  I used to have a Fender Twin reverb.  Loved kicking it and making the cool spring sound.  I gave it away a few years ago to a student that was incredible but broke. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 02, 2010, 11:18:18 AM
How loud do you need it? My 22W (@8 Ohms) Fender Deluxe Reverb (1x12) is wicked loud, when I get it to the right level of overdrive on the tubes, it's almost shaking the room. I was looking at a VibroKing, but at 60W (3x10) I'm not sure I'd ever be able to use the amp's natural overdrive.

If you're thinking of heads, maybe something like these smaller watt heads, unless you were looking for something to gig, you might need a bit mroe:

http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Blackstar-HT5-Series-HT5H-5W-Tube-Guitar-Amp-Head?sku=483560
http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Egnater-Tweaker-15W-Tube-Guitar-Amp-Head?sku=423553

This one also looks kind of interesting.

http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Bugera-V55HD-55W-Tube-Guitar-Amp-Head?sku=502585

But I'm not much help here, I haven't heard any of them. I like my little Fender, it's not perfect but it gets the job done and is loud enough for the small club I visit. I'm also self-conscious about my playing, especially since I know most of the guys that work at the local guitar shops and I feel dumb playing in front of them...and I'm pretty good. But those guys are scary good. After buying the amp and guitar there, though, I now feel better about playing...when I have no money for new toys, heh. Listen, if you're halfway decent they'll enjoy the break from the millionth kid hacking up Enter Sandman or Stairway or whatever the song is that EVERY newb is hacking in every guitar shops everywhere.

My next toy is already pretty well scoped. Of course, it will be many, many years before I'll be able to afford it: http://www.taylorguitar.com/Guitars/Acoustic-Electric/Nylon/NS72ce/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 02, 2010, 12:54:11 PM
Thanks Sky.

I've been thinking about a head because I have a 2 x 10 enclosure that I use for bass and I wanted to see how it sounded with guitar.  I may also look at some other stuff. A local guy is selling a Fender Stage 100 for next to nothing.  It's a lot more power than I need, but the price is right.  There's always the pawn shop hunt.  Local pawn shop has a lake kayak I want and I may get him to throw in a 25 W amp for cheap.  I'll keep looking. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on June 03, 2010, 09:00:31 AM
Did you say what your budget was?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 03, 2010, 09:06:47 AM
Ideally, $500 or less.  I'm fine with used.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on June 03, 2010, 09:32:02 AM
Nebu,

if you just need a head and are wanting it to do musical masturbation (you know...playing by yourself) or home recording, I highly recomend getting the Vox AC4TV head.  The attenuater sucks, but 4watts is suprisingly loud and sounds very good, especially through 1x12, let alone 2x12 (it shakes my windows at 75+% volume, plus you get nice Vox overdrive at 50% for single coil and 40% for humbuckers). 

Plus, it's only ~$200.  Order the head from musiciansfriend, play it, and if you don't like it send it back.  They have a suprisingly good "not 100% satisfied" return policy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 03, 2010, 09:35:27 AM
Thanks Oz.  I'll take a look and may even mess with one when I go to Memphis on Saturday.  As Sky pointed out, a low wattage amp may do the trick since a) I don't play loud most of the time and b) it would be easy to overdrive when I wanted to do more distorted stuff. 

Appreciate the ideas.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on June 08, 2010, 05:09:17 PM
I bought a new Vox AC30 :heart:. Really versatile and it can really pack a punch though not a huge gainy sound, more of 30 watt face melter. I used it for a festival on Saturday and for a local gig on sunday and it worked well in both scenarios. The distortion channel is that Who my generation type of sound or Lennons sound on revolver, you need an AB foot pedal and two leads to switch between them though as there is no channel select pedal available.

The AC15 is supposed to be awesome too though a slightly different sound. If you don't need to cut over a loud rhytym section like I do then it would be definitely worth looking at as it's more affordable.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: NiX on June 15, 2010, 02:58:19 PM
Beginner acoustic guitar...and GO!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 16, 2010, 06:50:10 AM
I play this one every day while I'm saving for a real Taylor:

http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Taylor-Baby-Taylor-Mahogany-Top-Dreadnought-Acoustic-Guitar?sku=514967

I have a 'cheap' Alvarez that is full scale (jumbo, actually) that cost $400 (vs $250 for the Baby when I got it) that can't touch the Baby's tone. That said, the Baby doesn't intonate well, for a beginner that might not be a problem, though. On the upside, tone out the wazoo, an ebony fretboard is really rare in that price range, smaller scale means easy to play, and it's technically a travel guitar, easy to carry around (comes with a nicely padded gig bag).

If you want real cheap starter guitar, you should hit up the local music stores and ask the guys there to explain the trade-offs with cheap guitars. I'll put in some links, but I can't endorse any of these as I haven't played them - and of course remember that build quality can vary wildly within the same model range, so I always recommend playing a guitar before buying it as possible. Disclaimers disclaimed, here's the 'cheaper than the Baby' ideas:

Rogue (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Rogue-Starter-Acoustic-Guitar?sku=519266), these guys have been around for a while doing the super cheap guitar thing. If you just want to spend less than a video game to dick around, this might be an entry point @ $35. You can run it over and not feel too bad, but I don't know if you're doing yourself any favors if it doesn't sound or play well (easier to get frustrated). Cheap tuners = goes out of tune more often, etc. Just mentioning this to let you know there are super cheaps in the market.

Epiphone (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Epiphone-DR100-Acoustic-Guitar-?sku=518569) is Gibson's 'other' label these days, been making acoustics since the 1800s. Build quality can sometimes rival or exceed the Gibsons, I've played some beautiful Epis (and some stinkers). But here's a $99 option that I'd tentatively endorse as the cheap option.

Fender (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fender-CD60-Dreadnought-Acoustic-Guitar?sku=513903) also has a line of cheap guitars, comes with what is probably the cheap cardboard and vinyl case. I've never played a Fender acoustic.

I'd recommend the Baby, obviously, but the Epi might not be bad. Also, you might think about nylon string guitars, they're easier on newbie fingers. In fact, I think this Yamaha (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Yamaha-CGS104A-Classical-Guitar?sku=520139) is the same kind I started on 26 years ago :) At $140, that's another really good option. Heck, I think I'm going to have to buy one of those until I can afford the Taylor I long for (a couple posts back, @ $2650).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on June 16, 2010, 07:40:19 AM
Rogue's are hit or miss...  Their mandolins are total shit, but the resonator I have is amazing, especially considering its price vs. a national, etc.  The acoustics though...no clue. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on June 16, 2010, 08:13:01 AM
I think that the $200 price point is a good place to be.  Takemine, Washburn, Yamaha, Ibanez, and others will give you good bang for the buck.  If the person is a true beginner, then I'd say to buy the guitar that you really want to put your hands on.  If you aren't drawn to playing it, no guitar is worth the money.  I suggest $200 as this is a guitar sturdy enough to last until you build skill and of decent enough build to sound good as you begin to improve. 

If you live in an area with pawn shops, I'd consider that as well.  You can get a used acoustic for half price and get some great deals if you bring a friend that can play it and check for the straightness of the neck. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 17, 2010, 10:02:05 AM
We should have a whole forum, then we could make the "starter acoustic" topic sticky. :)

Seagull came up in the past too. Been years since I touched one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 16, 2010, 06:46:58 AM
Nebu,

if you just need a head and are wanting it to do musical masturbation (you know...playing by yourself) or home recording, I highly recomend getting the Vox AC4TV head.  The attenuater sucks, but 4watts is suprisingly loud and sounds very good, especially through 1x12, let alone 2x12 (it shakes my windows at 75+% volume, plus you get nice Vox overdrive at 50% for single coil and 40% for humbuckers).  

Plus, it's only ~$200.  Order the head from musiciansfriend, play it, and if you don't like it send it back.  They have a suprisingly good "not 100% satisfied" return policy.

I went down to Memphis and looked at the Vox gear and was pleasantly surprised by the quality for the money.  I ended up buying a Vox AC4TV Tube amp (http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Vox-AC4TV-4W-1x10-Tube-Guitar-Combo-Amp?sku=476326).  Thanks for the suggestion!



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 18, 2010, 08:09:58 PM
How loud do you need it? My 22W (@8 Ohms) Fender Deluxe Reverb (1x12) is wicked loud, when I get it to the right level of overdrive on the tubes, it's almost shaking the room. I was looking at a VibroKing, but at 60W (3x10) I'm not sure I'd ever be able to use the amp's natural overdrive.

If you're thinking of heads, maybe something like these smaller watt heads, unless you were looking for something to gig, you might need a bit mroe:

http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Blackstar-HT5-Series-HT5H-5W-Tube-Guitar-Amp-Head?sku=483560
http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Egnater-Tweaker-15W-Tube-Guitar-Amp-Head?sku=423553

This one also looks kind of interesting.

http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Bugera-V55HD-55W-Tube-Guitar-Amp-Head?sku=502585

But I'm not much help here, I haven't heard any of them. I like my little Fender, it's not perfect but it gets the job done and is loud enough for the small club I visit. I'm also self-conscious about my playing, especially since I know most of the guys that work at the local guitar shops and I feel dumb playing in front of them...and I'm pretty good. But those guys are scary good. After buying the amp and guitar there, though, I now feel better about playing...when I have no money for new toys, heh. Listen, if you're halfway decent they'll enjoy the break from the millionth kid hacking up Enter Sandman or Stairway or whatever the song is that EVERY newb is hacking in every guitar shops everywhere.

My next toy is already pretty well scoped. Of course, it will be many, many years before I'll be able to afford it: http://www.taylorguitar.com/Guitars/Acoustic-Electric/Nylon/NS72ce/


Thanks for the links, I have been pondering how to replace my usa made fender hot rod deluxe.  I picked up a peavey 6505+ 1x12" 60w  tube combo amp based on a recommendation but it really isn't what I am looking for.  It clearly says "metal and Metal only" when I play it, also the clean channel is piss poor.

Perhaps I am trying to have my cake and eat it to, but I want the crushing heavy tone of say Godflesh, Sleep, Boris, Sunn O))), Entombed, and the ability to play nice cleanish bluesy stuff, without:

a) taking out a loan to pay for it all
b) having to play at skull shattering volumes in order to achieve said tones.

I am thinking a small 10-20w head is the way to go, then get a cab that will still meet my needs.


anyone else with some recommendations? my budget: I would prefer to stay sub 1k hell sub 700 if possible, but for something truly once in a lifetime I could go higher.

gotta say, given your past, I am surprised to see you rocking to the Beatles so much Sky, variety is the spice of life.

oh as others have said I am far too self conscious to just bring my guitar to a store and try and bring an amp through its paces.  I have been playing quite some time, but I am an absolute hack. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2010, 06:56:20 AM
Hrm. Based on personal experience, I'd use the Fender for your cleaner/bluesy tones and then tack this on: http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Pro-Co-Whiteface-Rat-Distortion-Guitar-Effects-Pedal?sku=430631

That's what we used back in the day before we had full stacks to destroy ears. I'm "old school" though, there might be a better solution. But when we needed crunch, we were all about the Rat pedal.

And Beatles = drums, I can't play much of any of it on guitar or bass, other than a few singalongs on acoustic many years ago to bed hippy chicks. Even on the drums, it's more like James Brown than Ringo.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Amarr HM on July 19, 2010, 10:32:37 AM
I like my little Fender, it's not perfect but it gets the job done and is loud enough for the small club I visit. I'm also self-conscious about my playing, especially since I know most of the guys that work at the local guitar shops and I feel dumb playing in front of them...and I'm pretty good. But those guys are scary good.

oh as others have said I am far too self conscious to just bring my guitar to a store and try and bring an amp through its paces.  I have been playing quite some time, but I am an absolute hack.  

You shouldn't care it's your money, your music, your expression, there's always gonna be someone out there better than you no matter what. If that was everybodies attitude there would only be a handful of musicians in the world. Playing music is how good you are at expressing yourself, not necessarily how good you are. I've played gigs with friends & patrons in the crowd who are million times better (at least technically) than I am, but it doesn't stop me getting up there and doing my damnedest, I do admit it can get a bit nerve wracking as no-one wants to make a fool of themselves, but I always get positive feedback from somewhere which makes it worth it.

If it's really that hard, have a piece of music rehearsed before you go in, one that sounds interesting or you like playing and just chug away on that. I know when I try out an amp or guitar it usually dictates what I end up playing, if I try out a fender amp I usually end up with some delta blues or orange amps make me wanna bang out some Zeppelin riffs etc.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 19, 2010, 11:00:43 AM
Rearranged my recording setup to swap main mics. Also found that i can get multiple simultaneous mics going to the Audigy card and then to separate tracks, which is great... I didn't know my card could do that!

Also just set up AC-7 Pro on my new iPad, now I have wireless remote control of my DAW, which kinda rocks.

http://www.saitarasoftware.com/Site/AC-7_Pro.html


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2010, 11:10:11 AM
 :Love_Letters:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 19, 2010, 08:26:28 PM
Hrm. Based on personal experience, I'd use the Fender for your cleaner/bluesy tones and then tack this on: http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/Pro-Co-Whiteface-Rat-Distortion-Guitar-Effects-Pedal?sku=430631

That's what we used back in the day before we had full stacks to destroy ears. I'm "old school" though, there might be a better solution. But when we needed crunch, we were all about the Rat pedal.

And Beatles = drums, I can't play much of any of it on guitar or bass, other than a few singalongs on acoustic many years ago to bed hippy chicks. Even on the drums, it's more like James Brown than Ringo.

I bought a 1986 japan made boss hm-2 which is the exact stombox entombed and dismember used for that early swedish DM sound.  been messing with it, it very very fickle.  Later Roland moved production to china and those peddles aren't worth owning. (for example ebay japan made peddle starts at 80 bucks, china made ones go for around 10 bucks.)

Yeah I am thinking of returning the peavey and just buying the same fender hotrod deluxe.

*edit* Raph out of curiosity, what DAW do you use? (Ableton user here)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 23, 2010, 10:47:18 AM
I use Acid 7.0 Pro... a freebie version of version, uh, maybe 3? came with the first quality soundcard I owned, and I have just upgraded and stuck with it all these years. I loved how easy it was to use back then, and now of course, it's all grown up and complicated, but I know it so I don't mind.

I don't really do electronica or the like, mostly recording acoustic instruments and some electric, MIDI recording, orchestration, that sort of thing. So stuff like Reason, FruityLoops, etc, never really clicked with me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 23, 2010, 11:24:39 AM
I think I still have that acid disc that was bundled with a sound card, heh. I really need to get my shit together on the pc part of recording, ironically.

Though as I've mentioned, I'm mostly working on classical pieces, and recording precise pieces like that is a complete pain in the balls. Doesn't help that I don't bother 100%ing any one piece, I just flip through sight-reading as I go. Some of them get really  :ye_gods: like Bach's Prelude in C Minor (which is transcribed in D minor in my book). I can physically play most of it pretty easily - a couple trick string skips and I hate this arpeggio: 4xx431 that comes at the tail end of a D minor descending and is a huge finger shift (I think the preceding arpeggio is x0x231). Listening to the piece, you'd think the right hand would be difficult, but it's really easy, the left hand is a stone cold bitch that doesn't stop changing.

Here's a vid of Segovia playing it, my recorded version is a wee bit faster. And he pauses over the same chord I hate at around :25  :drill:

So anyway. Yeah, the first hurdle is memorizing the piece, then nailing it. Then the really tough part is to record the entire thing without making any mistakes in fingering or timbre, because the mic picks up every damned nuance. Blerg.

edit: Forgot to mention I did a quick run of recording drums, I definitely need a few more mics and also need to record my bass to a click track :) Doesn't help that the song I was writing was something completely bizarre, kind of a Mars Volta vocal and bass with funk drums and southern slide guitar. Wish I had more time and patience to nail things down better, I'd have quite a few recordings by now!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 23, 2010, 05:58:24 PM
psst Sky, you forgot to link the video.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 24, 2010, 10:17:42 AM
Oops, got busy at work while posting that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJd5kzuBSlc

Some of the other pieces in rotation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb3fK-xuTCU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrQBNeY-y0A (love this one)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jot7Q9n7L9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-JToCsJhmo (he adds in another piece, but I like his version of the core song, so there)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvgHlDNczL8 (one of my more favorite pieces in rotation right now, especially around 1:05, I've been working on an alternate version that recalls that minor arpeggiation section a couple more times in the piece)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XWCfpYrcLE (another Carulli rondo, I have 4 in rotation)

And some older stuff like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jovQE7gMhA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSAWZcRb_9o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEmeero7LUA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0-_8NI6wEo (trying to find this interpreted better on youtube = fail...thnik I need to upload a copy and get yelled at by purists :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFfH1eUKmLM

Ok, I'll stop now. You get the idear.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 24, 2010, 11:26:27 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0-_8NI6wEo (trying to find this interpreted better on youtube = fail...thnik I need to upload a copy and get yelled at by purists :)
Camera won't connect to the computer, not that seeing me play it is anything special :P Luckily I recorded the video in my nascent basement studio and hit play on the recorder. For some reason, really quiet. Need to boost it in post, I guess. Blah. And really, I'd have rejected it outright for flaws, but I wanted to share /something/ I've been up to, it's been so long.

Se io m'accorgo be mio d'un altra amante (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/seiomaccorgo.m4a)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 27, 2010, 09:05:07 AM
Amp update: Traded in my Vox AC4TV Tube amp for a Vox VT30 Modelling amp.

DEMO Video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLmci_K3CKc&feature=related)

The versatility is fabulous for getting my guitar chops back and the amp was pretty reasonably priced.  While the AC4TV had better sound overall, I'm really enjoying the toys that this modelling amp gives without having to dig up all of my old pedals.  It's a great spacesaver.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 27, 2010, 09:47:33 AM
I want to beat that demo guy, heh. Years ago when I just had my crappy practice bass amp as a guitar amp (my post-band, everything got stolen amp), I got a Boss GT6. That's basically the same kind of thing, it can do a million things that I never use. I try to keep things simple, the only sacrifice I make is the Fulltone FD2 because I can't play loud enough to keep my amp driven where I want it. Though now that I have my proto-studio set up in the basement, I have been using the straight amp drive more. Can't wait to get that room finished, still holding off to see if it stays dry from year 1 improvements to the house (a couple wet spots last year, nothing this year, so I'm very cautious).

Anyway, versatility is nice to have. I like to just sit sometimes and punch through all the factory presets and play to whatever effect comes up. I was the studio rat in the band, though, always spending time in front of the rack dialing in new sounds. Probably why I don't do as much of that now, I guess.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 27, 2010, 10:54:20 AM
I figure I'll buy a good tube head when I have the guitar skills to appreciate it.  Right now, I like having a lot of toys to color the fact that I'm a hack guitarist. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on July 27, 2010, 11:06:03 AM
If anyone is interested in a dead-simple recording program (for free), check out:

Audacity (http://"http://audacity.sourceforge.net/")

I designed and built a small 6W tube guitar amp modeled loosely on the old '59 Fender Champ, however I changed the tone stack to a Baxandall configuration.  With a 12AX7, it completely saturates and is loud enough to hurt.  With a 12AY7 it's mostly clean, and with a 12AT7 is completely clean (and very low volume even dimed).

If you like DIY'ing your own gear, you can build a AX84 P1 (http://"http://www.ax84.com/static/p1/AX84_P1_100616.pdf").



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 27, 2010, 11:19:00 AM
I figure I'll buy a good tube head when I have the guitar skills to appreciate it.  Right now, I like having a lot of toys to color the fact that I'm a hack guitarist. 
That's exactly how I did it. Played my shitty guitar until I felt like I needed a better one. And I've gone from playing with 80s metal distortion with flange and verb to just overdrive (with the amp verb and vibe, though).

I also need to get off the pot with a DAW already. I've been holding out hope for way too long of getting a laptop to bring down to the "studio", it gets old unplugging everything and bringing it upstairs, downloading the raw tracks into the pc. I'm not sure my old pc is up to snuff for DAW duties. Might be better now that I'm not trying to record directly to the pc, though ultimately I would like to have an interface for exactly that. Also starting to feel limited by the MR8HD and would like to trade up to the MR16HD (http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Fostex-MR16HD-16Track-Digital-Recorder?sku=701051). Still 4 live inputs, but unless I'm doing way more than I am now, that's enough for say 4 drum mics, or I could maybe pick up another small mixer to make a drum sub-mix. With the magical cash I don't have :)

Would love to build an amp someday. A guitar, too. Ah, well. Some day.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on August 02, 2010, 10:39:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0-_8NI6wEo (trying to find this interpreted better on youtube = fail...thnik I need to upload a copy and get yelled at by purists :)
Camera won't connect to the computer, not that seeing me play it is anything special :P Luckily I recorded the video in my nascent basement studio and hit play on the recorder. For some reason, really quiet. Need to boost it in post, I guess. Blah. And really, I'd have rejected it outright for flaws, but I wanted to share /something/ I've been up to, it's been so long.

Se io m'accorgo be mio d'un altra amante (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/seiomaccorgo.m4a)

nice.. very quiet, but nice man. I have to say it is a very interesting contrast to the initial impression I built of you music wise.  Earlier I had an image of (indulge me here) long thinning hair, ratty Jeans, and old 80's concert t-shirts (uhmmm not that there is anything wrong with that if that is indeed the way you roll).

As for a DAW, I have found it really useful in my *productivity*, I went with ableton live, which is probably not very well geared to what you are doing (Live is more DJ/looping stuff -> industrial type crap).  That said, lots of DAWs have promo cds, which is how i settled with Live, ask friends/shops if they have promo DAW cds and check some things out.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 03, 2010, 07:42:31 AM
Har! My hair is anything but thinning, I've donated to Locks of Love two years running (min donation is 10"). Right now I've got more of a 30s gangster pomade thing going, though. And my long beard has been shorn, I'm clean shaven. Casual wear would probably be a sports jacket, some very not ratty jeans and a modern concert shirt (because I like to support artists I see and buying merch is a good way to do that). I got a laugh out of most of the musicians at the renfaire digging on my Derek & Susan shirt.

You're not the only one surprised by my classical stuff. I'm what you might call....boisterous...and given the fact that when I was a pro I was playing metal and most locals know me from sitting in on blues jams, classical might not seem like my thing. But my first formal training was on classical guitar in school and I've always loved it. Several of my band's songs were classical pieces I wrote re-arranged for the band, and the training in fingerpicking is why I became such a good bass player, which then reflected back onto my guitar playing with a lot more percussiveness (too much, purists might say).

My favorite renfaire band was only at half strength - the harpist is in Spain doing a pilgimage and the charangist is in TX with his Andean band. On the good side, the viola de gamba player was playing a great 8-double-course lute and covering a lot of the harp parts while also getting in his solo vdg parts. At one point he was doing a bass line, arpeggiated chords and a solo on top.  :eek3:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 12, 2010, 10:41:57 AM
Rescuing thread from page 2.

I have been neglecting playing lately. So much so that I started to lose my calluses. I figured it out when I wrote a new song for the first time in ages, and had trouble recording it because my fingers hurt too much!

So I have resorted to the Baby Taylor to play in the meantime. It has light gauge strings, unlike my main beast the Blueridge jumbo, which I string with mediums (.013s and up).

I decided to try out the iPad's built-in mic, so I practiced for an hour or two with the iPad running Multitrack DAW (iTunes link (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/multitrack-daw/id329322101?mt=8)). Turned out to be pretty easy to blow out the mic, but the quality is surprisingly good for a tiny mic like that. Unsure what it is doing to my iPad's memory :) , but I have the 64gig wifi so I think I have room. Getting the songs off of there was a little counterintuitive, but the docs make it clear... just not used to looking at docs for an iPad app!

Oh, and the new song (http://www.raphkoster.com/music/DeadCheerleaders.mp3)... you guys are probably the right audience for it.  :awesome_for_real: Comments welcome.

Not recorded on the iPad, but does use the Baby Taylor. Was trying out a new mic I picked up at a Guitar Center sale for $50, a Digital Reference DRI100 instrumental mic. It turned out to have a sound I didn't love, but liked OK (my vocal mics are better) but does have great directionality and did a decent job of not picking up the vocal. The vocal mic however picked up everything on the guitar, oh well. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 13, 2010, 09:02:34 AM
I just bought an el-cheapo no-name classical guitar to get my nylon fix. It was set up really well, I love the local shop's setup guy (who did my Baby and SG). I just went for strings and picked it up on a whim, the fiancee loved it and I was able to snag it for $80, so what the hell. Be a long damned time before I'll have $2400 for a Taylor. Sounds decent, biggest problem is the cheap fretboard, I'm all about vibrato and the wound strings scratch. It's really quite awful and I probably won't be able to record with it, but it's good for retraining my fingers on a proper-sized fretboard (vs the Baby I've been playing for the last couple years). Some songs I have to re-learn because the stretches are so much longer, and my blues-based thumb-over playing doesn't work on the wider and fatter neck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 16, 2010, 01:59:18 PM
I just bought an el-cheapo no-name classical guitar to get my nylon fix.

Came across THIS. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ9jrBg4Lwc)

Amazing what you can do with a classical guitar and some skill.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 17, 2010, 07:26:01 AM
That guy bars right on the fret wire, odd. Great performance, of course. I don't know how those guys keep their nails like that. I follow the Tarrega school of fleshy picking, mostly because having long nails is not very compatible with manual labor.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 17, 2010, 11:16:17 AM
You know what one of the most humbling devices in the world is? A metronome.

Ye gods. I think I have a piece down and find the fastest I can play it (all 16th notes) is 66 bpm without errors. And the piece is moderato, like 108-120 bpm, ffs.

That said, being able to go home and get about a half hour every day on guitar is awesome. Fiancee agrees, since most days she gets to listen.

According to this WICKED PAGE (https://rex.kb.dk/F?func=find-c&ccl_term=(WRD=Aguado%20AND%20WWW=http%20NOT%20WWW=sheetmusicnow%20NOT%20WWW=freehandmusic%20NOT%20WWW=hebeonline)&local_base=mus01&con_lng=ENG) I just found, it's actually andante, which is a bit more humane (76-108bpm). Around 70 is where it starts really falling apart from a technique standpoint, my fingers aren't able to keep a steady pace and actually have a tough time even keeping up with the tempo...and it's an easy pattern. The sheer repetition and trying to play it so evenly is challenging.

If you scroll down to 25 pièces pour guitare : extraites de la Méthode / de D. Aguado, it's piece #18 in that book.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on September 17, 2010, 05:01:08 PM
I don't know how those guys keep their nails like that.
Lots of TLC.  I clear mine and still work a semi-manual labor job without too much trouble (laying cement\construction\etc would probably be much harder).  My guitar instructor used to chastise me for not taking better care of mine.  I still do it out of habit after all this time and when I pick up the guitar I can tell whether I let them get too long or not ;-)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on September 22, 2010, 12:04:10 PM
Hi all, check this out and tell me what you think:

Enter Sandman - My Version (http://69.181.243.144/mp3/ES.mp3)

I found the drum part to Enter Sandman from Metallica online (ostensibly from the Rock Band tracks), and added my own bass and guitar parts.  I consider Metallica's 'Black' album the quintessential hard rock sound, and I've been trying to get a recording setup that gets me close to that raw sound.  So the only part that remains from the original is the drum track:  everything else I added.  The whole thing I was trying to accomplish here is to perfect my recording technique to get close to this kind of hard rock sound.

Please forgive the sloppy guitar playing ... bass is my main gig.  I never liked Jason's original track so I took it up a notch, played with more distortion and played through a wah pedal (much like I feel Cliff might have done).

Let me know how close I got, and if you have any suggestions on the sound quality.  I didn't spend a lot of time mixing this so it may be guitar heavy.  I also gave up in the middle so it drops off rather abruptly.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 22, 2010, 12:21:47 PM
I hate that song so much.

edit: Sounds great, man. I still hate that song. I want to get a good wah, they're great for tone control on the fly even if you don't wakka wakka. Definitely guitar-heavy, most guitarists would say the mix is perfect :P I'd like to hear the bass a bit more, sounds like a nice tone on it. When recording a 'four piece', I like the bass and guitar to sit right at the same volume...of course, I used to do the mixing for our four piece, hah.

One thing on the palm-muting on guitar, a personal thing. I like to use a very heavy pick (like over a mm, I use a 1.5 iirc) and really push your palm into the strings hard and bash the shit out of them. When we were a five piece I was the 'feel' player, the other kid was much cleaner, I could've been called sloppy I guess, but the combination of the extremely clean articulation and my tone from bashing the shit out of the pms was just intense. Also, adding the lower fifth to a power chord when you're playing a doubled part adds a lot of sound to it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 23, 2010, 09:34:32 AM
I like it. 

You're making me want to start recording again.  I'm just not sure I'm brave enough to post it.  I have a feeling that my original stuff would sound horribly dated... ah, the 80's.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on September 23, 2010, 12:56:13 PM
Danke for the feedback.

I used a 3mm pick.  :wink: My technique has lapsed considerably over the years as I don't play much anymore, and spend most of my time recording and mixing rather than playing.  Palm muting is so much about muting everything just right so that there is a clean distinction between the open notes and the muted notes, but not so much that the resonance is choked off.

But I've found the 4-piece heavy rock sound to be the most challenging one to 'get right'.  Heavy distorted guitars tend to wash away everything else, and getting a mix just right to where you can hear everything has been a real pain.  But I've learned a few good pointers:

1) However good the human ear is at frequency selection (especially in the midrange), the louder of two equal-frequency sounds will always win.  So if you have two distorted guitars mixed together along with a male singer, they are all competing in the 500Hz to 1.5kHz range.  But I've found the secret is to use compression to emphasize the attack of everything:  drums, guitars, bass, etc.  This means fast attack and release times to really let the initial 'thwack' through.

2) Bass can't compete with metal guitar sounds.  The hash send out by a heavily overdriven guitar is almost impossible to compete with.  I've found distortion and attack is the only way to do it and have it heard in the mix.  Also, guitars need severe low-end rolloff below 200Hz or so to let the bass fundamental come thorough.  But for guitar, more distortion is definitely not more.

3) The amount of reverb needed to glue a hard rock mix is staggering.  You should hear the drum part solo'd:  it has almost 2 seconds of reverb decay time, and the snare is the worst.

#2 was a real epiphany for mixing for me:  I always tried to get everything sounding good in isolation, then blend afterwards.  It just doesn't work.  The guitar have to sound mid-rangy and snarly with high end, bass needs lots of distortion to put content up in the frequency ranges sensitive to human hearing, and the entire mix needs saturation to glue together.  For example, the guitar tracks solo'd on the mix above sound *awful*: trebly, screechy, snarly, but you can hear them over everything else!

Also, all of the sounds were recorded direct:  the guitar tone was from Guitar Rig 3's JCM800 model, the bass was through my Sansamp RBI mixed with a DI track.  I will also try panning the guitars to create more space.

And Nebu, record and post away.  We're only judgmental assholes in the Politics forum, right? :wink:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 23, 2010, 01:57:30 PM
Now that I have my drums set up, I really want to get something together. I do have one new track I wrote inspired by a track off suicide girls' guide to living, which has an great soundtrack (http://www.myspace.com/suicidegirls/music/playlists/sg-guide-to-living-1328113).  The Temptress by The Flies was the inspiration track, I call mine Come Hither Stare. It showed me I need to record to a click track :P But I love that Flies track, try to spin in a little Mars Volta rhythm section and some slide guitars. I lost a couple of the verses in the time it took to get everything down, I write extremely fast and then the inspiration is gone. But at some point I need to go back and clean it up and get it in a recorded form.

I use no reverb. I hate it, I was taught in the 80s when people were drenching shit in reverb and it biased me against it. I guess I should note you should not at all ever listen to my thoughts on mixing, because most 'professionals' hated my mixes. Too loud, too hot, too much bass, drums are too dry, blah. I'm so fucking lofi, my ideal is the way my band sounded through our boom box. To achieve perfection is to have failed, for artistry is imperfection (says the perfectionist, hah).

Wait, I do use some reverb, but not as glue or to make a part sound better. I use it purely to achieve a sound, like on the slide track I mentioned above. Same as I might use a little delay as an accent. I used to be very into effects (but not verbglue!), part of why I got away from them. I don't have the patience (or weed) to sit in front of a rack for hours on end dicking around with sounds anymore.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 24, 2010, 06:00:43 AM
2) Bass can't compete with metal guitar sounds.  The hash send out by a heavily overdriven guitar is almost impossible to compete with.  I've found distortion and attack is the only way to do it and have it heard in the mix.  Also, guitars need severe low-end rolloff below 200Hz or so to let the bass fundamental come thorough.  But for guitar, more distortion is definitely not more.

Two things I learned "back in the day"

1) I could rise above the guitar more easily if I brightened up my tone.  Something with some solid low-end punch, but thick in the mid range helps a lot.  I used to pattern my sound after Geddy Lee and Chris Squire (sound, not playing).  The brightness really helped compliment the oversaturation of guitar.

2) With bass, a good amp head and cabinet are really a must.  I played through a lot of rigs, but never felt that my sound was where it needed to be until I got my Ampeg tube head.  I'm not suggesting that you spend crazy $$ on bass gear, but will say that it makes a big difference.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 24, 2010, 06:52:06 AM
I played through a Kustom Kasino Koncert solid state head. It was originally bought for our singer before we had a PA, one of the toughest amps I've ever seen. And wicked loud, though I forget the amps on it. Had a wicked punchy tone, I also used to try and dial in Geddy's tone (I stole the settings from our first bass player while I was still playing guitar in the band, he played in a rush cover trio with our first drummer). Played it through a peavey 2x15 that I loaded with 2 EV full-range 15" 400W speakers. Used no effects except a rat pedal and wah for playing Cliff's bass solo (and of course my own at times). I bought the speakers new retail, but the cab and head I maybe paid $150 for both used in 1987 or 8.

Bass shouldn't compete with guitar, it should counterpoint and complement. Thickens up when playing similar lines, and good writing should provide enough places where the guitar is freed up to do more in the upper registers. I dunno, we never had a big issue with mixing - again, most engineers I knew when I was in school hated my hot lofi mixes, though. I lost the hdd that had my tape transfers from the lone rehearsal/writing tape I have left (out of hundreds  :sad_panda:). I did have a sample tune that we had just begun writing that had a good example of what I'm talking about...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 01, 2010, 02:16:58 PM
I posted up the chords and lyrics for the song I posted here a bit ago.

recording:
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/DeadCheerleaders.mp3

chords & words:
http://www.raphkoster.com/2010/10/31/the-halloween-song-dead-cheerleaders/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on November 01, 2010, 10:37:30 PM
been slouching, the fact that all i have is a horrid sounding 5w practice amp is not helping.

thinking about buying one of these as a head, 20w tube with a great price.  Unsure about cabinets, I have always had combos, thinking a 2x12

http://www.jetcityamplification.com/2009/09/19/jca-20h/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 27, 2010, 08:12:49 PM
Xmas this year, I asked for (and got) music gear.

It took me all day today, but I have managed to set up a brand-new M-Audio ProjectMix I/O as my recording soundcard for Acid Pro. 8 inputs plus MIDI and it is managing to coexist with my Audigy, so i still have the MIDI on that plus I can use it for ordinary sound needs. Having motorized faders and being able to do automation with them feels awesome. :)

I also got a Blue Yeti mic and an Icicle (XLR to USB adapter) for messing about with iPad recording.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 28, 2010, 09:12:20 AM
*drool*

I got a footstand for playing classical. We're on tough times around here, probably going to get a lot tougher.

I'm still working a bit on my classical repertoire and need to focus down onto a few pieces to polish up. Been playing a lot of Tarrega through a couple transcribers and I've hit the point where I need to take about 50% of one transcirption, 25% of another and 25% of my own fingerings and write my own transcription.

And trying to get a clean recording of a classical piece, I've complained about that before (as well as learning new hand placements with my el cheapo full size classical instead of the Baby). When I was cooking on xmas, I had a classical guitar cd from the library in and had to turn it off because the guy was messing up so much, without any finesse to the playing...so I do realize I put a lot of pressure on myself, hah.

Here's a couple I'm working on (not me, but good versions):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K474y2EpHN4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrQBNeY-y0A


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on December 28, 2010, 10:01:42 AM
I feel lame even posting in this thread since I'm nowhere near the level of you all, but I have been getting back in the habit of picking up the guitar and messing around (it tends to come and go).  Got all excited when I realized that my fingertips had proper calluses again.   :drill:

Since I've got a little more room in my home office these days I'm thinking I might dedicate some space to getting all my guitars in one room and setting up the amp.  The last time I tried messing around with that I was living in an apartment and the downstairs neighbors would complain regardless of how low the volume was set, so I just had to give up and go back to the acoustic, but that shouldn't be an issue these days.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 29, 2010, 07:49:34 AM
Sam, now you shut your damned piehole about that 'nowhere near the level' hooey. Nonsense. We all start somewhere, and some of us started twice. Back in 99, when I was unemployed and pretty disconsolate, I was listening to Houses of the Holy and decided to learn Over the Hills and Far Away, after not playing for about four years (and even then, I hadn't played much guitar for years, as I was a bassist). Took me a while to learn it, but that sense of accomplishment got me back into playing and now I'm way better than I ever was on guitar.

So three cheers for Samwise, always like hearing about people getting into playing.

Got turned onto a barn jam, but it's a bit of a haul, over an hour away. Hate logistics. Not sure if I'm more excited about the jam sessions or volunteering to split wood. Several of the acts have begun recording together, though, so it could be interesting. Seems like roots/blues/bluegrass stuff with a bit of obligatory classic rock.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on January 14, 2011, 12:11:06 PM
Here is my latest creation:

Rage - Killing in the Name (New Bass) (http://69.181.243.144/mp3/KillingInTheName-NewBass3.mp3)

I took the Rock Band stem tracks and re-mixed it with my own bass track.

I'm working on an album where we are trying to get that Rage/groove/hard rock sound, so I'm starting with known entities.  Here's my bass setup:

1) Fender Jazz clone - rewired to support series mode (used on this recording)
2) Two bass tracks recorded - one is clean DI, the other is through my Sansamp RBI (which nails the SVT grit sound)
3) Both bass tracks are run through speaker sims (8x10" cab sims to be exact)
4) I used tape saturation plugins extensively to try to add that 'saturated' mix sound

Let me know what you think of the overall sound (please forgive the bass screw-ups...it was 1 take!).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 20, 2011, 07:25:50 AM
I now play a PRS SE (the 25th anniversary models.. 25" scale.. they are awesome cheapos) and a Line 6 Spider IV. I still have a my modded Jazzmaster sitting around, but it's like I don't need anything else. I feel like I can "shred" a little more than I ever did, and the amp is versatile is hell. Line 6 is definitely where to go for digital.. Probably old news. But I've owned the Vox amps and they just don't have their shit together as far as tying the product line in with PC interactivity.

And Sam, I'll reiterate what Sky said. For someone who's played since he was 13, I'm going to say that I "suck".  :grin: Hendrix started when he was 13 and look where he got. :\ I sat in my room alone as long as he did and I'm still not there.. He's not even an advanced player, technically. Some people just have the right "feel", I think, even if it's John Lee Hooker playing 2 notes. And some people take a long time to get anywhere.

Uh.. not sure what my point is. Don't feel bad.

On a sidenote, any of you acoustic guys like Bert Jansch (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqjUWJtH88c)? He's old, but I just discovered him. Good stuff


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 20, 2011, 10:11:52 AM
My old hd that had some of my digital transfers of old practice tapes (I only have a couple) died a long time ago, finally started that project again. Found some old tapes when cleaning out some boxes at my mother's place and got all excited...but my goddamned ex-girlfriend's mother had taped over parts of two of them and even then they're from a period when we were breaking in a new drummer, so it's mostly teaching him songs. The rest is just song idea jottings and one cassette that was from our 4-track, so the speed is all slow on a regular cassette player (and only two tracks per side). Kinda bummed. I did find a fragment of one song I had forgotten, in its first stage of being written. Really sucks not having recordings of the vast majority of our stuff, we wrote prolifically and I don't have a single good recording of anything, really. And what I do have is a fraction of our catalog.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on January 21, 2011, 07:20:11 AM
So my daughter has been bugging us for a guitar for over a year now. We'd said no because she joined band in 6th grade and wanted to play sax but lost interest after 4 months and won't practice.  I wasn't going to blow the cash on a guitar and have her do the same thing.

Well, at Christmas she was still adamant that she wanted to play guitar so I bought her a cheap $40 one off Amazon that's been on backorder until this week and will arrive Monday or Tuesday.  I figure this way I'm not out too much if she loses interest.  Who knows, I was the same way about photography at her age and my parents didn't indulge me and now I feel like I missed out on a lot of time for my favorite hobby.  I can't do the same to her.

She's got picks and a strap and I was going to pay for lessons, but being unemployed now there's no way we can afford the $80 a month.  So, my question to you guys is this.  Do you know of any decent resources online that'll teach a 12 year old?  She's found a bunch of youtube vids and I can of course try  :google: but I'd rather get some leads from you guys who actually know about this.

Thanks!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 21, 2011, 07:56:43 AM
I don't really do much of anything online for lessons, so grains of salts and whatnots.

http://www.acguitar.com/lessons/ I used to sub to this mag, but it's usually aimed way too low with too much advertising. Since we're talking beginner, it might be something to look into. They cover a lot of the basic strums, chords and rhythms.

http://www.guitarworld.com/articles/lessons Guitar World is one of the last lesson-based mags standing after the deaths of Guitar One and GftPM. Lessons are probably too advanced, but feature a somewhat more diverse range (mostly metal/rock/blues/jazz).

Google kicks over a couple more stones, but I don't know anything about them. I would highly recommend getting a real instructor. Someone she feels comfortable with and can understand her goals, musically; basically teach her the fundamentals in a framework of artists she gives a damn about, rather than Mary Had A Little Lamb (unless she's a Buddy Guy/SRV fan, I guess). Youtube is also a good idea, I've heard the kids are into that and whatnot.

Again, the teacher could be the thing, but it can also totally turn her off if it's not a good fit. The ideal is to get someone who can get her up and running playing some basic strum versions of songs she loves to hook her in, and then give her the tools she needs (repertoire/practice/study) to improve from there.

edit: oops, just saw the 'financial clause'. What kind of music does she want to play, who are her favorite artists? I'll see if I can track down some cheap/free ideas suited to the student.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on January 21, 2011, 08:20:49 AM
She says she wants to play rock.  Her favorite bands are Green Day, Evanesence, 3-doors down, Fallout Boy, Bruno Mars.  She also mentioned Cage the Elephant, Muse and Rob/ White Zombie.  Needless to say an understanding of a consistent style is not quite instilled in her.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 21, 2011, 08:34:31 AM
She says she wants to play rock.  Her favorite bands are Green Day, Evanesence, 3-doors down, Fallout Boy, Bruno Mars.  She also mentioned Cage the Elephant, Muse and Rob/ White Zombie.  Needless to say an understanding of a consistent style is not quite instilled in her.

I think the best way to learn is to start with the major open chord forms first (E, A, C, D, G, F) and then recognize how they transform in bar chords.  Once you learn that and the shapes of the scales and pentatonics, then move on to the minor chords and repeat.

That right there will open the door to thousands of songs.  Then again, I'm a bass player.  I learned everything by understanding chord shapes and scales first.  If you can see the neck in patterns, it all begins to fall apart.  I wish that someone would have taught me this way rather than playing Smoke on the Water a hundred times.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 21, 2011, 09:09:06 AM
Well, there's the right way and the fast track. I'd also recommend learning the right way, but the fast track is what hooks you in. It's better to play smoke on the water than practice making an A chord for an hour (I still can't make 'em good in open position).

Something like a strum book (http://www.amazon.com/Green-Favorites-Strum-Guitar-Songbook/dp/0739040707) give some nice chord charts so you can visualize how a chord looks and refer back to it as you learn the song. These work best if you know the songs, because it's just the lyrics with a note of what chord to play. The upside is it's relatively easy, you're just strumming the chords. The downside is you're not getting the actual guitar parts, for which you'd need a more advanced book like this (http://www.amazon.com/21st-Century-Breakdown-Authentic-Guitar-Tab/dp/0739062050).

A website like this (http://www.rockmagic.net/guitar-tabs/green-day/) can give you a similar chart (http://www.rockmagic.net/guitar-tabs/green-day/boulevard_of_broken_dreams.crd) as well as tablature (http://www.rockmagic.net/guitar-tabs/green-day/boulevard_of_broken_dreams.tab) that should be pretty close to the recorded version, internet tabs are notoriously sloppy. But you don't get the chord diagrams on the web, so visualization is tougher.

There's a whole school of thought about standard notation vs tablature. I like both, ideally you'd learn standard notation first, but once you figure out tablature, it's easy. Another scenario where I favor getting the student to the fun asap. They may regret not learning the 'right way' (as Nebu and I and most guitarists will), but I think it's more important to hook the student in so they play long enough to regret taking shortcuts :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 21, 2011, 07:29:43 PM
I have never had a guitar lesson ever. I did it all out of books. Find the songbook for her favorite album and a chord book and see what happens.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on January 22, 2011, 02:05:03 AM
I took lessons for a bit when I was 13, and I kind of wish I had stuck with it.. he was a Julliard grad. I probably would have turned out badass.

Anyways, I just used books or played by ear myself. I created little "rites of passage" for myself.. So I'd just reiterate what Raph said. Have her learn songs she likes.

As for me, I got lazy on even learning those things note for note, and started learning only parts or the basic melody.. and then improvising the rest.. and then moving on to my own riffs, taking little bits and pieces of everything I learned and putting them together into something new. I respect people who put more thought into it all, but I'm not a technical player myself. There's a different level of discipline there. I used to kind of feel inferior for this, but people are different. This is going to seem unrelated, but I've been on this Jungian/MBTI kick, and I definitely fall in the "F" category. Some people play technical, some go by aesthetic feel. Not to carry about that, but I think it'd be a great help to pinpoint where a person is on that level and encourage it. If you force some alien approach, they'll quit or just starting lack any enthusiasm for it down the road.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Merusk on January 23, 2011, 08:33:06 AM
Yeah I agree getting lessons is probably the best way, but short of a winning lottery ticket that's not happening for a few months at least. (Yay job market.)  I shall look into all of these.  Thanks for the tips, guys.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 09, 2011, 12:03:30 PM
Going off the Moore thread, lest it get too musiciany :)

I mentioned Cantiga, they're really one of my favorite bands. Check out Conrado once he picks up the charanga partway through (especially ay 2:48 when he starts his mad strum attack). He's a big inspiration on my playing. I've asked him for tips, he just does what he does, without thinking about it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2xmbm2rTik

Last night I got out of the shower with a strong urge to play some Master of Puppets. Plugged in for the first time in a looong time, the SG was a bit resistant at first. Turns out I remember most of it (except all but a sketch of the solo parts) and can still play it to speed, though the downpicking during the verse is a specialized skill that would need polishing. I just played syncopated parts instead and pulled through it. Then I went into some Buddy Guy stuff from Hoodoo Man Blues, then some Allman Brothers jamming. Then went upstairs and hit the Baby (wait, you know what I mean) for some Classical tunes, my current favorite is Folias by Gaspar Sanz.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWzswSPbsNM - though done with a bit more ornamentation than my version has notated...guy has perfect emotive force on it, though. Missing from so much classical guitar. For instance, here's a less perfect version, lacking the passion (imo): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEmeero7LUA

I wish I could concentrate on perfecting one part of my repertoire before getting distracted :p


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 11, 2011, 11:40:11 AM
My main repertoire book is sitting at my desk at work waiting to be broken down, hole punched and put into a binder. 300 page sheet music books should be spiral-bound, ffs. Went to do it and realized I'd need a 9x12 binder, and who has those? So off to teh intarnets for a special order that setting me back a few, waiting on that to come in. I bought two, one for current tunes and another for storage. I hope this allows me some better portability to maybe take the setup to the renfaire and sit in with some folks at some point.

The good thing is that sitting under my main book was my Tarrega book, which I'd been neglecting. So I've dipped back into Capricho Arabe in a big way, and also Adelita. I'd done some work on both, but both contain a couple tough fingerings. Capricho has several, though they're getting much easier already, and it forces a nice lesson in playing closed position D-shape chord with an alternating bass (3rd and 4th figures being the LH fingers for the 1st and 2nd figures, respectively):

5    5    3    3
6    6    4    4
5    5    2    2
x    x    x     x
3    x    1    x
x    3    x    1

There's a couple of closed chords with the alternating bass like that. Not super difficult, really, but not stuff I'd normally play so just a matter of getting the muscle memory, which means practice, practice, practice! The Adelita has a barre with a pull-off that my fingers just hate. I suck at barres anyway and usually just use fragments, so that's not helping. It's kind of a

8---9p8----------- 
x---------------8--   
x----------8---8--
x---------------7--
x-------------------
8-------------------


I also had an issue when I tried changing strings, I've never actually owned a classical guitar before, I just played them at school. So it's my first time changing strings because the wrappings were gone at the first several frets. The rocktards at the local music shop gave me ball-end replacement strings. Cheesy, but easy I guess. The high E broke immediately. So I bought a traditional set and just used the high E...which broke immediately.

They also seem much thinner than the ones that came on the guitar, or that I've ever played. When I was buying the second set, I intentionally looked for thicker strings, but they looked to be one size, which is crazy (since it's too thin). Both sets (Martin and D'Addario iirc) are also very bright, like electric wound strings. The G and B are ok (if a bit thin and loose). I solved the E string issue by using the B from the second pack, that seems to be working great so far.

Didn't realize how much I missed my classical guitar, I really love playing it, even if it's a supra cheapo - the neck finish is already going away. The guitar is basically disposable and I'm eyeing a battered old spanish-make nylon as a trade-in. It's old and cheap and beat to shit...but it's got an ebony fingerboard, at least.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on March 11, 2011, 01:12:15 PM
I don't think my fingers are long enough to do those Capricho fingerings on a classical's fretboard. I have small hands.

Got the last Rock Band "real guitar" in all of San Diego yesterday. Have barely started to mess with it... just tried hooking it to the game. But the real thing I got it for was to try it out as a MIDI guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 11, 2011, 07:20:53 PM
I don't think my fingers are long enough to do those Capricho fingerings on a classical's fretboard. I have small hands.
Me too. Made playing bass on a long scale bass (my old Peavey I started on) a total bitch. Still not the toughest chord in my practice list. That belongs to Bach's Prelude in Dm, which goes from a standard fingering Dm with a descending bass pattern to this monster:

1
3
4
x
x
4

With a descending bass on the D string! Even the stretch of

5
5
5
x
x
1

after an intervening Am chord is a relief. Goddamned Bach voicings :p That said, I do love the classical's scale for playing fingerstyle, it's wide enough to let me use a little bit of the techniques I developed over the years on the bass. I was playing some electric for the first time in a while and the pick felt so limiting, although the ability to play faster single note runs was nice.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 10, 2011, 07:52:47 PM
One wall of the music room, which is finally starting to take shape. In order: 1894 S S Stewart banjo, Washburn electric bass, 1962 Gibson acoustic, Blueridge jumbo cutaway acoustic electric, 1962 Gibson Melody Maker.

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/218019_10150214218996528_651391527_8551614_7597273_n.jpg)

Another wall here we have a new Venezuelan cuatro, an Xmas present from my mom. Played very percussively, note the strike plate on the top. A Michael Kelly mandolin, round soundhole on an F style body. Then a 1950s Harmony baritone uke that used to be my grandfather's. Haven't been able to date it more precisely. Below you can see my new ProjectMix board and monitors, a drum machine, and the corner of the digital piano. Oh, and the dragon.

(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/207577_10150214223471528_651391527_8551636_7586735_n.jpg)

Have not got enough hangers to do anything with the Rock Band Squier MIDI guitar, the Baby Taylor, the Fernandes Nomad Star Wars electric, and have no idea what to do with the mountain dulcimer.

First thing recorded in here, pretty rough.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/AprilSnails.mp3

Fun guitar playing factoid: the closing harmonics are played at fret 2.2 (between frets 2 & 3).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on April 10, 2011, 08:02:06 PM
Yeah I agree getting lessons is probably the best way, but short of a winning lottery ticket that's not happening for a few months at least. (Yay job market.)  I shall look into all of these.  Thanks for the tips, guys.
Is your daughter still playing the guitar?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 11, 2011, 09:37:35 AM
Congrats on the music room, Raph. I'm relegated to the basement, my house is too small for a better dedicated space right now. Cool on the cuatro, have you tried the charango? One of my favorite players is a charangista, it's mostly a percussive instrument but also allows for a lot of scale work (he uses a pignose as a cheater for volume on the melodic passages).

Nothing new here, still same status as last post. B section of Capricho Arabe (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dqzGgMnypw) (about 2:30 to 3:00) still a stone cold bitch thanks to the d-shaped chording at the third fret. Just lots of barre work with ornamentals above, and barres are a weak spot for me, as I mentioned (and that one barre in Adelita is still challenging). A section is completely memorized and C section is playable without error much of the time. Having unbound the books into a 3-ring binder was a really great move, it's wide enough to lay out all three pages and I only have to flip one (since I have the A-section memorized).

Well, a couple new developments, I've been approached for some gigs. Local renfaire promoter has been making suggestions and a coffee house has also asked me to play. Cable tv gets turned off at the end of the month and my goal is to build at least a solid 45 minute set by July. I can probably scrape together enough really basic pieces to pad it out, but I really, really want the Capricho as my centerpiece, since it's my favorite tune. I've put off the Bach Prelude for now, only room for one technical piece at a time!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 12, 2011, 09:32:35 AM
I've recruited the fiancee to "Pandora" my repertoire, give me thumbs up or down on whether to incorporate a song. Problem is, she's all thumbs up, dammit.

I was going through marking my sheet music with three tabs *ready *tough passages and *needs work/not ready. Breaks down to about 1/2 ready, and split between the other two for the other half. Spent an hour playing through that, so I already have roughly a half hour out of that material, and it's about half of my normal practice repertoire. So I'm in better shape than I thought, even if the stuff I really like most is in the *tough passages and *not ready categories :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 31, 2011, 11:12:05 AM
RISE!

I just played around with one of these the other day and thought that it may be a handy gadget to help my daughter get more excited about learning new songs on guitar/bass.  Amazon is selling them today for $99 and it gave me pause.  Anyone else play with one of these?

Tascam Guitar Trainer (http://tascam.com/product/gb-10/)



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 31, 2011, 11:50:36 AM
I never used a slow downer (soft or hardware), but I'm probably atypical for every answer, heh. I mean, if you like it and think it will stimulate some progress (and if it's in your budget, obviously), why not? At worst, if she doesn't like it, you can mess around with it. I can see a lot of use for it when I listen to guys like Kruno Spisic and my heads spins trying to think of playing sustained fast passages without sheet music.

With the SD card and overdubbing, it could be a great idea notepad, too.

To update my gig possibility: the renfaire was rainy, so I didn't go. The local renfaire drunks said it was great...but probably less so for the sober.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 06, 2011, 02:55:11 PM
just picked up a modded Orange tiny Terror head, and have ordered a Whitebox Amplification 2x12 cab with a Governer and a Texas Heat speakers.   Still waiting on the cab so all i can do is gaze longengly at my Tiny Terror.   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 07, 2011, 08:18:15 PM
I've been working on several Zappa songs a lot lately and my fingers are killing me.  In addition to resuming lessons to be able to read sheet music and understand theory, I'm having a better time than I've had in years with it.  15 years of bad and lazy habits are hard to undo though.

Still thinking about hunting down an acoustic guitar... but have zero idea what is actually "good" vs. "really expensive" vs. "complete crap"


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on July 07, 2011, 10:18:01 PM
Still thinking about hunting down an acoustic guitar... but have zero idea what is actually "good" vs. "really expensive" vs. "complete crap"
What's your budget and what type of playing (fingerstyle, strumming, etc.)?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 10, 2011, 09:07:28 PM
What's your budget and what type of playing (fingerstyle, strumming, etc.)?
I really play both styles depending on the song.

As far as budget, I don't want to break the bank.  I was thinking $350-500 would be a nice start, but I've been so out of touch with musical instrument costs I have zero idea what is "fair" vs. what is "ripping you off."  The music stores in my town growing up had the market cornered and a cheap electric or acoustic to start with ran upwards of $600 and most models they carried were in the $1500+ range (this was in the mid 90's too).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2011, 09:41:20 PM
I'd start by looking at the Yamaha FG730S ($300) and the Seagull S6 ($400). Those two guitars are probably the most recommended entry-level acoustic guitars. Both have solid tops and laminated sides and backs. The Seagull is made in Canada rather than China like the Yamaha is which is one of the reasons it's more expensive and is probably slightly better suited to fingerstyle than the Yamaha because it has a cedar top, wider string spacing and slightly shorter scale length (less string tension). Neither of those come with a case or gig bag at those prices so you'll want to factor that in as well.

There are a lot of reasonable quality acoustic guitars coming out of China now so in terms of "bang for the buck" at your price range that's where most of the choices will be (the Godin-brands guitars like the Seagull above being one of the exceptions). Brands that specialize in these kinds of guitars include Blueridge, Recording King, Silver Creek, and Eastman.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2011, 06:49:07 AM
My two full-sized acoustics are crap.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2011, 11:59:43 AM
Raph, I just posted a youtube of a nice version of Stones (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc6oTi_fcP0) over in the Ultima Forever thread...which reminded me that you did a version. Is it similar to that version and if so, do you have the sheet music for it? I'd like to add it to the repertoire, maybe play it at the renfaire and see how many Ultima geeks it turns up.

Really hoping to get a couple things recorded soon. This summer, it's been crazy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on July 19, 2011, 05:15:54 PM
My version was the one that was on the alarm clock on Earth in U9. It was buried in production, you could hardly hear the guitar. I went looking to see if it was up on youTube anywhere, and didn't find it in a quick glance.

It was not a classical version really; like, I played the melody partly on harmonics. I'd have to figure it out all over again.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 19, 2011, 05:54:01 PM
my 2x12 cab arrived and I am in heaven

(http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk112/Fraeg/DSCN0263.jpg)

Sounds simply amazing, I have a Celestion Texas Heat and The Governer in it.  Is is built like a tank, and the tone... ooooh the tone.  Last night i realized I was just strumming the same chord over and over just bathing in the sound.  By far the nicest setup I have ever owned.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2011, 08:10:22 PM
Wow, that's a nice little setup there. Really nice.

Whatcha got for pedals?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trias_e on July 19, 2011, 08:37:13 PM
So I've been trying to learn classical guitar, and had been working out setzer's epitaph (one of my favorite tracks ever) from FF6 incredibly slowly and painfully. 

Then I found this awesome guy.  Been on his channel for about an hour now.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BgUsFa5nBI&feature=relmfu


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2011, 09:05:05 PM
I highly recommend this Willard book: http://www.amazon.com/Library-Easy-Classical-Guitar-Solos/dp/0825635047 It says 'easy', but that's in the context of classical guitar. There are some ridiculously challenging pieces in there (imo). I'm a tab reader, and I'll forego the lecture on how it's an appropriate form of notation for classical guitar :)

It's probably my desert island songbook and has been for the last couple years. I dip into other stuff, but I go back to that one and also the first Willard book I bought long ago, http://www.amazon.com/Easy-Classical-Guitar-Gig-Book/dp/0825628334 The gig book has some overlap, and a few pieces I prefer the notation in one or the other.

The first link will get you a solid repertoire of everything from Bach to Dowland to Carcassi to Sor to Tarrega.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: trias_e on July 19, 2011, 09:15:21 PM
Awesome, thanks for the recommendations.  I'm actually taking a beginner's course in university right now which is unfortunately a bit too, well, beginner for me.   So having some books to jump ahead to will be nice.
 
I just wanna play this stuff right now though!  :D  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ytTyMGbDZA&feature=related


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 19, 2011, 09:37:15 PM
I just wanna play this stuff right now though!
It doesn't look like anything he's doing is overly complicated, if you had the tablature I bet you could work on it and figure it out ;-)  I've always wanted to find the music to some of those older games I heard that had impressive soundtracks... but it's not exactly the easiest thing to do in my experience.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 20, 2011, 12:16:28 AM
Wow, that's a nice little setup there. Really nice.

Whatcha got for pedals?


Boss:  NS-2 noise suppresor, DD-3 Digital delay, MT-2 metal zone (kinda meh), Japanese made HM-2 (the later ones made in china are garbage),

Other: circa 1995 Sovtek Big Muff Pi (an absolute beast, amazing and well worth it if you can find one at a reasonable price, i have been told that what you can buy new today is not the same pedal at all), and an Ernie Ball volume pedal.  

Have a strat knockoff, and  a 1996 PRS CE-22.  I bought the head used and it was moded with an effects loop.
a crappy photo taken with a flash, this photo does no justice to the grain of the maple top on the PRS.
(http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk112/Fraeg/DSCN0274.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 20, 2011, 12:23:38 AM
So I've been trying to learn classical guitar, and had been working out setzer's epitaph (one of my favorite tracks ever) from FF6 incredibly slowly and painfully. 

Then I found this awesome guy.  Been on his channel for about an hour now.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BgUsFa5nBI&feature=relmfu


a book i highly recommend that is just an awesome resource is The Guitar Players Handbook by Ralph Denyer   http://www.bestguitarbooks.com/the-guitar-handbook/   Hard to explain, it isn't say a "how to play the guitar book" but it is just an amazing resource for an absolute beginner or an accomplished player.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 20, 2011, 06:19:33 AM
Nothing more humbling than trying to record classical guitar.

Probably shouldn't have started with a couple beers in me and the cat spazzing around the house.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 18, 2011, 10:51:19 AM
I was in LA this past weekend and stopped in at McCabe's Guitar (http://www.mccabes.com/), which was a pretty amazing place. They had Dean Markley Pro Mag Grand pickups on sale, so I picked one up because only one of my acoustics has a pickup in it, and I figured this would let me amplify the Baby Taylor and the Gibson.

My Blueridge has an undersaddle. I tried the two side by side and it hammered home to me how crappy the undersaddle in this 20 yr old guitar is. :P Really no comparison. And by all accounts, the Dean Markley is no great shakes.

Now I am wondering what would be involved in getting a quality pickup into that guitar... It has a couple of small knobs built in, and I hate the idea of chopping a larger hole in the side to get one of those fancier setups... sigh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 18, 2011, 11:04:44 AM
I've just been using an SM57 pointed at the hole of sound.

And still being utterly humbled by the perfection required of classical recording. There's an entire wing of hell that forces guitarist to attempt recording classical.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 18, 2011, 11:32:30 AM
I've got mics that I record with, for sure, but often when recording I like to have the mic signal and a line signal, so I can pan them to opposite sides, or if I want to accent a phrase, I can fade in the line signal, even apply effects to it... With the slide guitar especially.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on August 18, 2011, 11:45:42 AM
I was in LA this past weekend and stopped in at McCabe's Guitar (http://www.mccabes.com/), which was a pretty amazing place. They had Dean Markley Pro Mag Grand pickups on sale, so I picked one up because only one of my acoustics has a pickup in it, and I figured this would let me amplify the Baby Taylor and the Gibson.

My Blueridge has an undersaddle. I tried the two side by side and it hammered home to me how crappy the undersaddle in this 20 yr old guitar is. :P Really no comparison. And by all accounts, the Dean Markley is no great shakes.

Now I am wondering what would be involved in getting a quality pickup into that guitar... It has a couple of small knobs built in, and I hate the idea of chopping a larger hole in the side to get one of those fancier setups... sigh.
There are pickups that have soundhole mounted controls or you could just use an external preamp/DI.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 29, 2011, 11:05:43 AM
A new piece recorded with a harmonic capo. ( http://www.weaseltrap.com/ )

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/AugustTimepieces.mp3

Open G.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 29, 2011, 11:46:00 AM
I wish I could play guitar as good as you :(

Might be my favorite of yours yet.

Talking with the fiancee, we were discussing a local band made up of siblings that is actually three or four incarnations, an irish band, an allmans/southern rock band, country, etc. They invited me to play with them looong ago, and the topic recently was sitting in with the irish incarnation, because they play at the place we stay in VT. I believe I framed it as "you know, if I play the Inn with them, I'd get paid to vacation in VT and get a room for a night or two," which went over pretty well.

Which is a long introduction to why I pulled out my celtic songbook, and leafing through it found the first song I want to learn. "Cock Up Your Beaver" My poor fiancee. To be fair, it's an archaic way of saying "tip your hat" (a beaver-skin hat). But so filled with awesome (and not a bad tune, either). I just want to announce the song at a pub.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 29, 2011, 05:08:59 PM
I wish I could play guitar as good as you :(

Might be my favorite of yours yet.

Thanks!

Funny though, I think of myself as merely "pretty good." I am guessing everyone does, though. I don't think I can play a lot of the stuff you do.

Also it helps to write my own stuff. ;)

...found the first song I want to learn. "Cock Up Your Beaver" My poor fiancee. To be fair, it's an archaic way of saying "tip your hat" (a beaver-skin hat). But so filled with awesome (and not a bad tune, either). I just want to announce the song at a pub.

 :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 30, 2011, 07:30:26 AM
Fair enough on the playing your own stuff part. I just think I've lost my patience to work on a single piece of music for very long. I should probably start smoking pot again, at least then I had a pretty large volume of recording because I'd just sit and jam for hours. I'm also in an odd spot where I've got a lot of genre schizophrenia happening, which makes for some interesting parts overall but the individual components are suffering.

My speed and accuracy is way down, but my understanding and selection is on the rise. So it's rewarding on one hand, but utterly frustrating on the other. If I could have one wish, it would be that I could concentrate on actually learning proper theory and notation long enough for my understanding to catch up to my playing ability.

Anyway, enough self-criticism. Although I may cringe, I'll upload a song or two that I recorded a month or so ago (and alluded to earlier). Also need to get my foot switch working with my recorder, that would make things much easier...the interface is very clunky and I've got about 200 "Song045" "Song198" etc....


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 30, 2011, 10:24:03 PM
You know, I should share the chord forms for this piece, because it really is so stupid simple, much simpler than the classical stuff you have been learning. What sound impressive is mostly just regular semi-fast arpeggio picking on the right hand. I bet you would figure it out in no time.

Tuning: open G (DGDGBD). Originally played with a harmonic capo.

Verse:
002100 with a hammer on, 054000 with a hammer on
002100 with a hammer on, 054000 with a hammer on
032000 to 022000 to 000203 000023  000034
032000 to 022000 to 000203 000023  000304 000034 

Chorus:
Hammer on bass string 0 - 3 – 5 to bend on 2nd string at 7th fret
Hammer on bass string 0 - 3 – 5 to bend on 2nd string at 7th fret then 5th
Hammer on bass string 0 - 3 – 5 to bend on 2nd string at 7th fret then 9th
Hammer on bass string 0 - 3 – 5 to bend on 2nd string at 7th fret then 5th
(repeat all four)
000780 slide to 000890 to 000870 and back to 000890 then down to 000550 and 050050
020020 to 050050 then 020020 030030 040040 050050 (2x)
000000 to 200002 to 300003 to 400004
020020 to 050050 then 020020 030030 040040 050050
000000 to 200002 to 300003 to 400004
020020 to 050050 then 020020 030030 040040 050050  and hold

Bridge:
xx000-11 to xx0005 to xx0002 to pull off on xx0000 (repeat)
007650 to 004320 to 007650 to 003210 032100 054300

Overall song structure:
Verse, chorus
Verse, chorus
Bridge
Verse, Chorus


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 31, 2011, 06:36:52 AM
Going off my last post, I try to turn a negative into motivation so I pulled out Cantiga's songbook to mess around with the Tarentella. Bob (the piper/founder) said they love to jam on it, and after messing around with it for a while I can see why. Learning the melody from notation is a bit slow, because I can't sight read the notation (YET), but it's good practice as the main melody is pretty simple and I know the song well. But just going over the chord structure and then playing it as a loose jam "in the style of", I can see the value of it as a jam platform: a good progression that has a major A section and minor B section. So many great choices for melodic improv over those, only held back by my aforementioned atrophied and stunted theory.

But I definitely learn better through jamming on concepts, so it worked my reading a bit and I'm still working on major key jamming. Trying to make it sound less Allman Bros, since that's where I opened the door to playing in major keys. In minor keys, I'm extremely comfortable and I can play a decent mixolydian (my trick is just to play a minor scale but use the 5th as a root).

I like open G, I used to play a couple blues tunes in that tuning. I should pull out the alvarez and set it up for that. Actually, I should probably raise the action and use it as a slide platform...

Oh, I also worked through a few of the celtic tunes, mostly scottish highlands in the section I was working through. Really cool arrangements, the guy explains what he's doing for voicings, since a lot of it is drone, he'll say "this part is the drone and melody of the pipes," etc. Totally different from the other stuff I'm playing, tons of hammers and pulls, which I love to do (I've favored legato forever), so it's difficult but lots of fun and puts a new sound in the trick bag. I think this is the right version below. I just wish it was ring-bound, going to have to unbind it and put it into a binder, best move I ever made for my classical sheet music.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 31, 2011, 07:06:18 PM
Nothing more humbling than trying to record classical guitar.

Probably shouldn't have started with a couple beers in me and the cat spazzing around the house.
So, ok. Cringing time will be had by me now!  :grin: Here is a random selection of crap played slightly drunk, please be forgiving of the sloppy playing (and I'm not blaming the beer, hah).

Andantino Mosso (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/andantinomosso.mp3) - I put comment about the songs here, dunno this one is just one in the rotation
Capricho Arabe (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/caprichaaarg.mp3) - Just the A section, without the evil B section...I'm normally much better since I play it alot...
Etude 7 Opus 60 (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/etude7opus60.mp3) - love this piece, but sooo badly played. Sorry!
Prelude (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/prelude.mp3) - Good example of one of the shorter little ditties, tons of these 1-page, no-repeat jobbies in my binder
Rondo in G (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/rondo1.mp3) - called it quits after Bart attacks me at 40s in  :ye_gods: Love the minor section of this tune

Listening back, I threw in my experiment on Capricho, it's normally AABCBA or something and on the 3rd A I've been playing it as a soft polka/roma beat so I just threw that in the truncated version.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on September 01, 2011, 11:04:53 AM
These sound great to me. No cringing necessary. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2011, 11:08:27 AM
Thanks! Quick recordings but I did finally grab Audacity to boost the volume a bit and add a touch of verb to moisten things up slightly.

Of course, my fiancee's favorite track is the one Bart interrupted  :oh_i_see: "It's so cuute" Makes me laugh because I hustled through the end of it before he could strike again. He was upset because I normally let him rub his face on the headstock between songs.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 28, 2011, 10:05:20 AM
Just bought this for cheap on eBay.

(http://www.americanmusical.com/ItemImages/Large/25372.jpg)

Pretty fun instrument to play and pretty well built.  Thin and fast neck, bartolini pickups that are very hot, and it slaps as well as it plays straight (though I'm a terrible slapper).  The range of sounds is amazing.  I still prefer my old Fender Jazz, but wanted something with active electronics to mess with and this was too cheap to pass up. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 28, 2011, 10:35:37 AM
Looks slick. I never played through actives, too hot for me. But then I liked solid state medium scooped, so whattoiknow.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 28, 2011, 10:57:43 PM
Grats on the bass Nebu!

I just finished my parts bass:  a Fender Geddy Lee clone from SX Jazz bass parts ($110 for the bass, and $60 for the blocked maple neck).

(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww296/mglmatador_photos/SX%20Geddy%20Lee%20Jazz%20Bass/IMG_6774.jpg)

(http://i729.photobucket.com/albums/ww296/mglmatador_photos/SX%20Geddy%20Lee%20Jazz%20Bass/IMG_6770.jpg)

I have another fretless one from parts to finish as well.  Looking into a set of Nordstrands to go in both.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 30, 2011, 09:32:04 AM
Nice bass Miguel.  I like the Geddy neck.

Does anyone know some software for looping mp3 files?  That or some type of freeware tool that will allow me to A--> B repeat some music?  I'm trying to improve my guitar chops and it would help me learn some solos and look for patters. 

Thanks!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on October 30, 2011, 01:37:37 PM
Nice bass Miguel.  I like the Geddy neck.

Does anyone know some software for looping mp3 files?  That or some type of freeware tool that will allow me to A--> B repeat some music?  I'm trying to improve my guitar chops and it would help me learn some solos and look for patters. 

Thanks!

Probably overkill, but Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net) does this.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 01, 2011, 06:40:47 AM
So... just been given a very basic acoustic guitar by a friend. I used to strum a few chords, about 15 years ago, I used to be able to read music, albeit slowly as if translating a foreign language with a dictionary, and I quite fancy spending half an hour a day to try and learn some basic skill with this instrument.

Any recommendations for a book I could work through to help? Are the "dummies" books any good for this kind of casual approach?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 01, 2011, 06:45:34 AM
Yes, the dummies books :) What kind of music are you interested in playing?

I need to make an amazon list of my usual recommendations.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 01, 2011, 06:56:31 AM
No preference for music type really, I just want to be able to play it without making people shout at me to stop! :why_so_serious: I do listen to a lot of folk type stuff, so that'd be nice.

I just spent 30 mins playing the ~10 chords I can remember and jesus christ my fingers hurt!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 01, 2011, 09:27:07 AM
Well, I can't help with the shouting, but practice might  :grin:

Raph might have better tips for getting up to speed on folky type stuff. I guess Guitar for Dummies would be a good start/refresher. If you've dialed in your chords, something like this series (http://www.amazon.com/Acoustic-Rock-Guitar-Chord-Songbook/dp/0634050613) is nice. Lyrics and chords, but you've got to know the songs, no actual music except a melody example.

For the nuts and bolts, here's my stock "I want to learn how to play guitar" suggestions:

Fretboard Logic (http://www.amazon.com/Fretboard-Logic-SE-Reasoning-Arpeggios/dp/0962477060) - An instructor friend recommended this years ago. This is the key that unlocked the last few years of my improvement and understanding of the guitar. Although I prefer the next book in this list now, I recommend starting here even though it's not as well-written and a bit primitive. It introduces the CAGED concept and once you get that under your belt, it opens up a lot of options for you.

Guitar Fretboard Workbook (http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Fretboard-Workbook-Barrett-Tagliarino/dp/0634049011). I'm still dabbling with this. Basically the primer on the guitar fretboard, how to understand it and move around freely. I love this book so much. However, Barrett uses a 'pattern 1, pattern 2' nomenclature and I prefer the straight CAGED nomenclature, which is why I recommend the Logic book first. Since you already know cowboy chords, it will probably make more sense thinking of CAGED, then just translate Barrett's stuff into that system (it's easy enough 1=C 2=A etc).

Chord Tone Soloing (http://www.amazon.com/Chord-Tone-Soloing-Guitarists-Improvising/dp/0634083651) - The second of the Barrett books. His teaching style resonates with me, and I like his workbook approach, so this list will be Barrett-heavy. Ymmv. This takes some of the concepts of the last book and applies them to improvisation.

Guitar Reading Workbook (http://www.amazon.com/Guitar-Reading-Workbook-Barrett-Tagliarino/dp/0980235308) - Self-explanatory, workbook for reading notation on the guitar. I should really tackle this book a bit deeper :)

Music Theory Guide (http://www.amazon.com/Music-Theory-Practical-Guide-Musicians/dp/1423401778) - Not guitar-specific, but as Barrett is an MIT guitar instructor, it's one of the more guitar-friendly manuals out there. Probably any decent theory guide will do, and you should learn theory (do as I say, not as I do!).

Library of Easy Classical Guitar Solos (http://www.amazon.com/Library-Easy-Classical-Guitar-Solos/dp/0825635047) - "Easy" in classical guitar terms. Not necessarily easy for you or me. I've been working this book for three plus years now, and I love it. The classical stuff I linked upthread is all out of here. A pretty wide variety of eras and styles, lots of pieces from method books (Carcassi, Sor, Guiliani etc). Some real basic stuff to pretty tough stuff (for me, anyway), love the spectrum. Get frustrated working through a piece, and you can always move on to a dozen more easier pieces.


Addendum on CAGED: if you know those 5 chords, you can pretty much play any chord anywhere on the guitar. Going to take a bit of learning and practice, but it's well worth it and other guitarists will think you're all fancy and whatnot.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 01, 2011, 10:13:35 AM
If you like old-school folk-type stuff, then I'd suggest RISE UP SINGING (http://"http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Up-Singing-Songbook-Anniversary/dp/1881322122"). It's just lyrics and chords to a giant pile of classics. That and a chord sheet will go a looooong way.

I also always recommend just picking up some stuff by people whose music you like. You'll be more willing to push through it.

For newer folk stuff, a lot of it is alternate tunings and fingerpicking, which is a bit beyond where you seem to be right now. So a lot would depend on who you listen to when you say "folk type stuff."

There's also ultimate-guitar.com and the like if you are looking for specific tunes.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 01, 2011, 11:13:01 PM
Awesome, thanks guys!

I think the "strum along to stuff you like" approach is going to work well for me, along with a basic book - the Dummies one to start with probably. I listen to something like Mumford & Sons or Johnny Flynn etc,  and I can hear a lot of fingerpicking going on in that that yeah, is way beyond me, but I can also hear chords that I can probably look up and have a go at. I also hear a lot of banjos or something so, whatever :p


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 02, 2011, 06:15:29 AM
Nobody ever likes my books!  :sad_panda:

You might check out acoustic guitar magazine, too. I dropped it because I was mostly using it for the chord chart/lyric and they only put one or two a month in. Most of the articles were either ads or aimed at beginning guitarists, so that might work for you. Lots of good basics like strums, easy finger patterns, etc.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 02, 2011, 06:49:48 AM
Your books look great Sky, just probably a bit advanced for me right now! Think Dr Seuss equivalent level.  :why_so_serious:

I need to practise a lot to build up finger strength. I have such girly little hands.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 02, 2011, 07:27:47 AM
My thumb still sucks for doing barre chords. I tend to just run inversions on the upper three or four strings because I'm lazy. Another reason I love CAGED so much, it allows me to be lazier because I can play better chords. But then I pay because sometimes you need to do a lot of full barre chords and it kills my thumb.

Playing classical has also isolated another odd weak point - my pinky, which is normally pretty accurate and strong, really struggles with complex chords in the middle strings. To give an example I've talked about before, in Bach's Prelude in Dm there is a jump from a Dm cowboy xx0231 to this monstrosity 4xx431. The 4th fret in the middle is the pinky and I struggle like crazy with that, even without the big shift between chords. The fingerings are, respectively, xxx0231 to 3xx421. So it's a big leap for the ring finger but also an accurate placement for the pinky. Also, I have small hands; made playing bass quite a feat. But don't let your genetics deter you, they just set an upper limit, it's up to you to find what you can do within that (answer: quite a bit!).

Anyway. My point it, even after you've been playing for years and have some idea what you're about, you'll still hit frustrating roadblocks. The only way through them is practice, practice, practice. That's really the best advice I can give: find some music you enjoy and practice it as much as you possibly can.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 02, 2011, 07:34:30 AM
I could spend pages going over my weaknesses.  Hell, I'm still trying to figure out what the hell those two extra strings are doing on the fretboard. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 02, 2011, 08:17:40 AM
in Bach's Prelude in Dm there is a jump from a Dm cowboy xx0231 to this monstrosity 4xx431. The 4th fret in the middle is the pinky and I struggle like crazy with that, even without the big shift between chords. The fingerings are, respectively, xxx0231 to 3xx421.

Ah, I see your problem. You're trying that with the human-standard 2 arms yeah? Having just tried it you clearly need at least 1 extra hand somewhere.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 02, 2011, 08:54:30 AM
Nah, just an extra finger or two.

Also, as my fiancee would point out at this juncture, I'm complaining that I can't instantly play a Bach piece that Segovia plays....so I should keep it in perspective. I'll link it just because I love it so much (it's a BW in this thread).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmTnLcOYEGE

There's also a couple twists in it. One is easy for me, some pull offs as the arpeggio would have gone beyond the nut, but the other is a string skipper, so arpeggiation of something like 0x6x45 (probably not that, just trying to go from memory). That skip I have highlighted in the notation because I always forget it. Great piece of music, though!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 03, 2011, 04:11:39 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmTnLcOYEGE

Wow, amazing stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 03, 2011, 08:12:59 PM
For the bass players out there, I found this cover of one of my favorite bass lines.  This guy does all the little things well.  I'm really trying to pick up some playing tips from watching him play. 

Do I Do - Stevie Wonder (cover) (http://www.youtube.com/user/bassowman#p/u/22/VpR3LkxXDwA)

I hope you appreciate the talent as much as I did.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 04, 2011, 06:57:46 AM
He nails the line, but how do you sit that still while playing Stevie?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on November 04, 2011, 01:52:35 PM
He nails the line, but how do you sit that still while playing Stevie?

Hello, he's a bass player. Most of them would sit that still during an earthquake.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on November 04, 2011, 03:07:14 PM
Bass lines in Stevie's songs are the perfect blend of groove and technical ability:  the feel is so damn important, and the runs are always challenging.

I got the master stem tracks for Superstition and I'm adding a bass line (the original was played on a clav through a Moog synth pedal).  I'll post it here when I'm done.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 04, 2011, 07:49:20 PM
Hello, he's a bass player. Most of them would sit that still during an earthquake.
I guess I was not 'most'  :drill:

Miguel: can't wait!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 15, 2011, 06:54:26 PM
My CD is back in print. Well, digital downloads, anyway.

This was recorded twelve years ago, in the Origin recording studio. It has been intermittently available but really, the main way to get it was originally the original mp3.com... Where some of the songs did OK on the of charts there.

http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/raphkoster


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 16, 2011, 06:24:32 AM
Does that mean you're putting cdbaby out of business?

 :cthulu:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 16, 2011, 07:51:44 AM
It's worse than that... from there, it goes to iTunes too!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 16, 2011, 08:47:12 AM
RAPH KILLED STEVE JOBS!

I hope you get some movement out of it. As you can tell from my classical recordings this year, I'm a long way from prime time when it comes to laying down a commercial recording, I'm jealous.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 17, 2011, 11:03:09 AM
I actually sold a copy of the album to someone I don't know yesterday. Amazing, this whole crazy Internet thing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 17, 2011, 11:43:46 AM
I actually sold a copy of the album to someone I don't know yesterday. Amazing, this whole crazy Internet thing.

Does that make you a 'professional recording artist'?  You now have a new line on your CV.

All joking aside, it's a wonderful thing releasing music to the general public.  Congrats on the release! 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 17, 2011, 01:32:49 PM
Technically, I already was... this same CD was on sale on MP3.com a decade ago, and I sold copies of it back then. Never been *profitable* with it though. So no tax writeoffs for me, by law I think that makes it a hobby not a business...!

FWIW, the process of getting something up for digital distro on CDBaby is around $60, and that gets you to iTunes and a ton of other stores. Getting actual CDs for order is a few hundred more. So the bar is pretty low. That album sale made me $7.59...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 18, 2011, 05:14:04 AM
Most of the small artists I know use cdbaby or are dumbasses.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on November 22, 2011, 11:12:04 AM
I wonder if I will ever properly record.... anything.

I was never that guy who was that interested in getting a 4 track, next to my guitar purchase. I've had some gear, but never make much use of it. I'd be happy if someone did it all themselves and press record for me.

If I do, the whole perfectionist side comes out and I truly get nothing done. Other than getting into some state of mind that starts hating my own songs.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 22, 2011, 01:15:35 PM
My recordings drive me nuts and certainly aren't ready for retail, but I did a bunch off the cuff a couple months ago that are on the previous page, Stray.

http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=4508.msg971403#msg971403

I'm hoping to get enough of a repertoire cleaned up to release a cd at some point. It would be cool just to say I did it. Classical is so tough if you're a perfectionist, though. Blues and rock you can get away with a lot of stuff, especially with effects masking some of it. Doesn't help that my natural reaction to messing up is to PLAY FASTER :)

edit - I also love this thread because I can go back and remind myself of stuff. In the case, the post just before the one with the music where I'm talking about transcribing and jamming on the Tarentella. Need to get back on that project, it was a lot of fun.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 06, 2011, 10:08:53 PM
Santa came early this year....

(http://www.musicalsparks.com/images/al3100/lp-new.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on December 06, 2011, 10:34:59 PM
Oh yeah, the Classic.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Furiously on December 07, 2011, 01:18:51 AM
What brand of Les Paul is that?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 07, 2011, 08:43:24 AM
Nice! Every stable should have at least an LP and a Strat. I went for the SG with the thin neck, the baseball bat LPs didn't work for me.

What kind of pickups?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on December 07, 2011, 10:53:35 AM
It's from Agile, which is essentially a rebrand of parts coming from Korea (like from the Cort factory).  A good friend of mine has a Cort LP and the parts look virtually identical (although the finishing is somewhat different).

The pickups are from Seymour Duncan, but I already have replacements.  The stock picks are SH-1's which are the PAF '59 clones.  I'm switching to the SH-2N and SH-4B combo (the 'Jazz' neck and 'Jeff Beck' bridge) as I think the tones are more diversified.

In addition, I'll be putting in a real shielding job and changing the volume pots to ones with pull-up DPDT switches, so I can coil tap each pickup.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 07, 2011, 03:07:31 PM
So I joined a local Meetup group for acoustic music get-togethers. They do a variety of things, and it looks like there's something every week just about. It's all mostly traditional music, with occasional folk scare or 60s stuff thrown in, it seems like.

The first on I went to was a "Slow Jam" -- people bring songs, you break into small groups each with a coupl eof tunes, spend two hours learning and rehearsing the songs, and then every group gets their turn on stage and performs.

The second was at the local craft fair at the park, and it was basically just everyone standing up and playing Xmas carols.  But afterwards, most folks left and some of us stayed behind and started trading acoustic jazz arrangements, which was a lot of fun, and felt like busking.

They also do a bluegrass picking party, and workshops, and more. Kinda nice, and it's great to get out and play with other folks. I got asked to join a band in the first couple of hours. I think I'll keep visiting them.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 07, 2011, 06:57:23 PM
That's cool, Raph. We have something like that in a local farm's barn, but it's about forty minutes away so I haven't been out there. I need to get something going with some people, but this area is so dead.

And I always get asked to join bands, the last time was that Beatles tribute as a drummer. If I can nail a decent classical set down, I've got a gig at a new coffee shop/restaurant just up the road a bit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on December 07, 2011, 07:40:45 PM
So I joined a local Meetup group for acoustic music get-togethers.
A friend of mine hosts these occasionally in her garage.  Always a good time to get 7-8 older hippies playing acoustic guitars with the ukulele and the occasional bass.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on December 08, 2011, 10:33:02 AM
I am so jealous of you guys.  I can't find any musicians to play with for the life of me and I'd love to play in some kind of a cover band again.

I hope Raph will provide some updates on the group.  That way I can at least live vicariously. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 08, 2011, 11:07:02 AM
I was tooling around with some guitar mags last night. Couldn't find my transcription of Holy Wars by Megadeth, I was watching some of the Sonisphere 2011 or Big 4 or something. Forgot how awesome that band is.

So, tooling through Working Man by Rush, first time I've played Lifeson's parts. I've done a few tunes on the bass, our first unofficial drummer was a Rush fanatic and keeps asking me to play covers (it's all he plays now). Lot of fun, now I'm thinking I should get a few more down to sit in with him. Not sure how he would deal with my jam factor, though. Not only do I just wing leads (preserving signature passages, of course), but at one point the tune drifted into the outro solo section of Iron Man with the descending blues pentatonic staccato riff, which I played through another verse and chorus then folded it back into Working Man.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on December 08, 2011, 04:40:18 PM
Not sure how he would deal with my jam factor, though. Not only do I just wing leads (preserving signature passages, of course), but at one point the tune drifted into the outro solo section of Iron Man with the descending blues pentatonic staccato riff, which I played through another verse and chorus then folded it back into Working Man.
If he's a hardcore Rush fanatic, he'll have heard the band do it numerous times live and not have a single problem with it, likely thinking it's pretty awesome.  Unless he's one of those "album way only, man!" kinda people (why would anyone be?) then he would actually welcome someone who isn't stuck to the sheet music or recorded album version that so many other musicians are.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 08, 2011, 05:53:43 PM
I can't think of a single cover I play that matches the album.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 11, 2012, 01:03:40 PM
This is from last month, but:

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/100-greatest-guitarists-20111123

Rage? Joy?

There are some things I like about the list (Johnny Marr gets credit for being awesome) and some things that make me go  :headscratch: (Hetfield over Hammett?)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 11, 2012, 02:02:33 PM
Holy shit, I'm 4 guitarists into it and my head just exploded. Lifeson is 98 below STEVE FUCKING JONES from the Sex Pistols? REALLY?

EDIT: PAUL SIMON? What the fuck is wrong with these people?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on January 11, 2012, 06:02:15 PM
Rage? Joy?
Most of that list is pure crap regarding the order.  And some of it is misplaced.  Paul Simon is a great songwriter, not so much a great guitar player.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 11, 2012, 06:10:52 PM
List badly needs Skunk Baxter too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 12, 2012, 07:08:11 AM
I love watching people get upset by those lists. They're awful.

At best, it's about what Ingmar mentions: spotlighting some guys who didn't get the spotlight. Tom Verlaine, Eddie Fucking "Play it like yo mama just died" Hazel; having spotify links for the artists to turn on folks to new stuff. James Burton but no Albert Lee? Also, a lot of cult of personality going on there (but ironically, no Vernon Reid).

And as someone who plays classical, just a general lol. At the very least you have to split it out by genre or you're going to get bizarre shit like 'minimalist' players outranking technical geniuses like Yngwie (was he on the list?).

No Zakk? BERSERKER RAGE


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 12, 2012, 08:19:34 AM
No Zakk, no Yngwie, no Satriani, no Vai, no Hammett, and guys like John Lennon (who was known as a bass player and songwriter more than he ever was as a guitarist) high on the list. Total fucking idiot list. They might as well have called it "Guitarists we think are awesome that you should totally listen to."


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 12, 2012, 10:03:51 AM
How about "Guys that hold a guitar and sell lots of records"

Keith Richards? Please.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 12, 2012, 10:16:47 AM
I'm not sure that's the whole story, given the voters are... a bunch of guitarists.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 12, 2012, 11:01:34 AM
Yeah, but guitarists are weird.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 12, 2012, 01:47:55 PM
Lol pop guitarists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx7vOb7GNBg


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 15, 2012, 06:49:26 PM
Holy shit, I'm 4 guitarists into it and my head just exploded. Lifeson is 98 below STEVE FUCKING JONES from the Sex Pistols? REALLY?

EDIT: PAUL SIMON? What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Once upon a time, he was actually a pretty phenomenal fingerstyle player, back when the style barely existed. You can go back to tracks like "Anji" to see that. Times have moved on some.

Also, I don't know if you have ever noticed this, but even in his later stuff, it's all arranged on guitar. The horn shouts, the piano parts, the bass line, everything. He always backgrounds the acoustic in recording and concerts these days, and just strums, but if you try to do all the parts at once on a guitar, you'll find that in fact it's all from one guitar part.

Haven't read the whole list, but he's made this list before... not surprised to see him on there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 15, 2012, 07:21:48 PM
Bah, Fahey but not Michael Hedges... that guy redefined acoustic guitar for just about everyone since.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 17, 2012, 08:50:48 AM
My point about Paul Simon is that he's not known as a guitarist anymore than Lennon is known as a guitarist. In fact, they are known as songwriters. Just because they happen to write it on a guitar doesn't make them a great guitarist, in my mind. The list was about great guitarists and those two just don't make the list to me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 17, 2012, 08:58:05 AM
So we're going to see Stephen Wrembel at the Egg next week. Just got in the promo email for it and turns out he's doing a free guitar workshop that afternoon...SO TEMPTING to try and get the time off and go sit in. Unfortunately, it's two hours away and I'm listening to our scheduler try to call in subs for THIS week, so I don't think my fiancee can get the day off to go.

For reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9YNKRwI5aU

You guys should keep and eye open for Stephen, he's getting a bit more notoriety now that he's done the soundtrack for that Woody Allen flick (Midnight in Paris), we saw him here in my nowhere town at the college just after he had cut the tracks (front row ftw). Kruno Spisic is another good one in that vein, but watch your lady friend, his voice tends to make them swoon a lilbit. Reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tji0YEc15yY

I would put Paul Simon on a great guitarist list, but there are a lot of guys not on that list that would be on there before him on mine. The two guys I just mentioned. Hell, was Brian Setzer on the list? He played a gypsy jazz set in the last show I caught.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 23, 2012, 05:48:50 PM
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/IdEst.mp3

On page 155 of Theory of Fun for Game Design there is some sheet music. This is that song, played on solo acoustic guitar.

The song is played in DADGAE tuning, one of my favorite “weird” tunings — basically DADGAD with an added 2nd. As usual, I miked up like crazy: two condenser mics aimed at the guitar (one at the soundhole, the other at the 12th fret) plus a bigger diaphragm mic sitting a couple of feet away. I also used a pickup on this one, a Dean Markley Promag Grand.

I have the sound space set up a little weird… the ambient mic is “in the back,” by applying a fair amount of reverb to it. It’s panned around 36% to the right. The fretboard mic and the pickup and panned hard left and right, with much lighter reverb. And the soundhole mic is dead center, with a dry signal.

This has been knocking around the house since 2003, but I just got around to recording it right before the holidays. Enjoy!



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on February 11, 2012, 11:14:28 AM
So even though I have not touched one in 20 years I have been pining for a guitar for a few years (midlife crisis?), anyway I finally gave in and snapped up a copy of Rocksmith and an intro level washburn (http://www.worldmusicsupply.com/Washburn-WISTDLITEB-Electric-Guitar-Black.html) on clearance for $180.  I was thinking I will be wanting an amp in the very near future but since I already spent more than I should have It needs to be cheap (preferably a modelling amp).

Currently wondering if this is a total waste of money (ie crap) or maybe a deal I should hop on while it is there:
Behringer V-TONE GMA106 (http://www.worldmusicsupply.com/Behringer-V-TONE-GMA106-Guitar-Amplifier.html) on clearance for $30.

Or should I wait a month spend a bit more and get something like this:
Line 6 Spider IV 15 - Combo Guitar Amplifier (15 Watts)  (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/650445-REG/Line_6_99_010_3205_Spider_IV_15_.html) for $80.

Or go out of my comfort zone $$ wise and spend twice that and go for a full featured modelling amp:
Vox Valvetronix+ VT20+  (http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/VT20Plus) for $169.

My guess is headphones most of the time and occasionally play over the speaker, but either way I can't have it too loud.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 12, 2012, 08:44:54 AM
My 2 cents:

1) An acoustic guitar will help you develop better technique.  An electric will be more fun to play.  I also suggest that people start with an acoustic unless they are younger.  It doesn't require an amp, the strings are harder to break, and it's completely portable.  I keep a guitar and a bass in my office at work for when I need to clear my head.  Think about which you'd enjoy playing more and plan to spend about $300 on a decent quality, entry level instrument. If you can't afford that, consider used.  I've bought a number of used guitars on eBay for half of their new price.  Many arrived with professional setups. I did get stung once... but that's bound to happen with eBay.   

2) If you do want to buy an amp, I'd suggest an inexpensive modelling amp.  I bought the Vox that's a couple of steps above the one that you linked and I absolutely love it.  It has an endless variety of tones and allows me the flexibility to try things.  As you improve, the amp will definitely grow with you.  It's well worth the extra $100 if you play for more than a year.  

3) Use youtube when you hit the wall.  You can find tutorials for about any common song that you want to learn and it brings a great sense of accomplishment to play through a complete song.  After a long day at work, I still love to go home and crank out "you shook me all night long".  It's a great stress release.  It's also a fun way to learn new chords and find new chord shapes in different neck positions.  


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: stray on February 12, 2012, 12:13:35 PM
I've owned Beheringer, Vox, and Line 6 amps. I'd definitely go with the Line 6. They're popular for a reason. Vox is OK, but they're better off making tube amps. Beheringer is cheap shit. It's ok if that's all you can afford, but I don't know.. something about their models and software doesn't sound very realistic. At least, last I checked, it just sounded very thin and tinny.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 13, 2012, 07:52:40 AM
the strings are harder to break
:why_so_serious:  I'm going to have to start building custom sets of nylon strings like I do with my electric. The high E on a nylon set is absolutely way too thin for me. I use a thicker than stock set of 11 nickels for electric, excepting the low E because it's a bit too big and smacks the pickups which are set pretty high on my SG.

As far as acoustic guitars go, these (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=4508.msg971403#msg971403) were recorded on a $70 el-cheapo classical (a display model, no less). I'm a fan of not spending a lot of money up front, then make the shortcomings of that gear a challenge to practice until I'm worthy of decent gear. Of course, that's said with a couple decades of experience behind me, so I don't get discouraged by the bad equipment, ymmv.

Instead of a tiny amp, you might think about getting something like the line 6 pod and putting some decent headphones into it. If you decide to get more into it, you have a decent bridge into the amplified world using the pod as your effects loop.

I had a little gorilla that bit the dust last year, it was nice for a fix (with my Boss GT6), but it pretty much sucked. I'd either surf hock shops for a decent tube amp or stick with the pod. You'll probably want some effects once you get an amp anyway, unless you're buying a pro rig and can play it at volume.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 13, 2012, 01:57:59 PM
My daughter, after years of ignoring the little student classical 3/4-sized guitar she begged for when she was seven, suddenly decided last night that she wanted to learn. So I started he out with five songs that are only D, G, and A ... the simplest (Clementine, Iko Iko) just D and A. They are mostly songs she knows, a few she loves, which I suspect will help a lot. I got her started with he own fake book in a binder and a chord chart. We'll see what comes of it, but she was willing to sit for two hours last night and practice.

Her "stretch" song has an Em in it... soon as she masters switching chords in time, I can try her on more stuff in Em.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on February 13, 2012, 05:15:23 PM
I'm a fan of not spending a lot of money up front, then make the shortcomings of that gear a challenge to practice until I'm worthy of decent gear. Of course, that's said with a couple decades of experience behind me, so I don't get discouraged by the bad equipment, ymmv.
Seriously I can relate to this.  My first and favorite guitar was a cheap piece of crap that I learned how to tune myself and work with its shortcomings.  I didn't even have an amp for the better part of 4-5 years on my electric, I was just learning to make it work and play without it.  I actually scared myself when I got a nice amp with a nice set of adjustments after 11 years, made it sound like someone decent was playing rather than me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 13, 2012, 07:26:08 PM
The biggest shock going from a $50 Cort reject to the SG was that it STAYED IN FUCKING TUNE.

I mean WOW. Game-changer.

Back to a cheap guitar, it's never in tune for long and the intonation is garbage. Really looking forward to getting a nice classical...the one Joe Walsh played at the Grammy's would serve nicely!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on February 15, 2012, 07:21:19 AM
Instead of a tiny amp, you might think about getting something like the line 6 pod and putting some decent headphones into it. If you decide to get more into it, you have a decent bridge into the amplified world using the pod as your effects loop.

Thank you, awesome advice!  I am pretty sure I will go with a line 6 pocket pod (http://line6.com/pocketpod/).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on February 15, 2012, 02:17:04 PM
So new guitar got here and the 3rd fret is slightly loose at the edge under the 6th string (can see about a hairs width of vertical movement between pressed and unpressed) it also feels jagged when running my hands down the edge of the neck.  At first the guy on the phone said it was just dry and a little humidity would tighten it up, I didn't sound very convinced so they are supposed to call me tomorrow with an RMA.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 15, 2012, 06:33:17 PM
Loose fret bad, not worth fixing on a cheap guitar. RMA would be good imo.

Cheap fretwire hanging over the side, yeah, cheap guitars have that pretty often.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on February 15, 2012, 07:22:51 PM
On closer inspection it was hanging over because the fret slide a little, I slid it back and it seems to be staying in place. I suppose it would tighten up if the wood absorbed some moisture.  I will probably still RMA it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 16, 2012, 06:39:38 AM
Frets are supposed to be glued in, you should not have to rely on humidity to hold it in place. Otherwise, there would be no guitarists in Arizona! Definitely RMA. I bet that's why it's on clearance.

I would have a hard time buying a guitar online. Go to a local music shop so you can actually put your hands on the instrument. Even with good guitars, there is a ton of variance in construction.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 16, 2012, 06:48:54 AM
I would have a hard time buying a guitar online. Go to a local music shop so you can actually put your hands on the instrument. Even with good guitars, there is a ton of variance in construction.

Even that is tricky business.  A cheap guitar with a good setup will feel better than a good guitar with a lousy setup.  I always tell new players (or returning players) to buy an instrument that they are excited to play.  After a few hundred hours on it, they'll know what they want/like.  Good call on the pod.  All this new tech is really cool. 

On a side note: I buy quite a few guitars online, but mostly because I know what I want/like and have experience working in a guitar store.  I also buy low.  If a guitar shows up and I don't enjoy it, I put on a new nut, a new set of strings, set the action low, and resell the thing for a couple hundred bucks more than I bought it for.  I should probably have said bass guitars, because 6 stringed instruments still mystify me. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 16, 2012, 06:56:58 AM
How do you sell? I've tried listing my old Alvarez on craigslist but even at a bargain price I got no interest.

Not to mention it probably needs some work, since I really have never gotten into doing setups and need to learn how to do so (maybe before I die would be nice). I think it's just a structural thing, in certain levels of humidity it's worse: where the neck meets the body the fretboard moves up slightly enough to make for some major buzzing. I guess I could raise the action or maybe look at restting the neck, but for a guitar I paid $400 and wouldn't get much out of, not sure I want to bother.

Maybe I should look at it as a project guitar to learn on...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on February 16, 2012, 06:58:43 AM
I would have a hard time buying a guitar online. Go to a local music shop so you can actually put your hands on the instrument. Even with good guitars, there is a ton of variance in construction.

I totally agree and if I at all knew wtf I was looking for I would do as you say.  Also, if I didn't live in Austin (aka the land of over priced used instruments) I would buy used.

This is basically my $180 learning guitar if I play it for 2 years and it holds together I'll consider it a job well done then hopefully proceed on to guitar #2 which I will buy in person.  Other than the fret issue I like it very much (so far) and even with the fret issue which hasn't moved since I slid it back into place) I would have paid $180 for this if I saw it in a shop.  

I tuned it once yesterday, dorked around with it + the pod (awesome) for an hour or so, then rocksmith arrived in the mail (even more awesome) and I screwed around with that for another few hours and the guitar stayed in tune the entire time.  My only complaints really (other than the fret) are the fact that it is a set neck so if the neck goes bad replacement isn't really an option and there wasn't a manual or documentation covering the switch positions/knobs, probably pretty standard stuff but how's a noob to know.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 16, 2012, 07:17:19 AM
How do you sell? I've tried listing my old Alvarez on craigslist but even at a bargain price I got no interest.

eBay. Find a similar guitar and price yours slightly below it with a solid "Buy it Now" price.  


I find cheap guitars to be discouraging.  They don't hold tune well and often have uneven necks due to cheap truss rod design.  Pawn shops were my best friend when I started playing guitar more.  You can play them on site and haggle when you find one you like.  Plus most pawn shops have a ton of them that they're dying to get rid of.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 16, 2012, 08:24:38 AM
It's been tough for me the last few years being broke with the truck payments. There was a really nice flamenco guitar at my local music shop for a couple hundred bones last year. Would've taken some work to get back up and running, but it played really nice. So I've been avoiding music stores :)

On ebay: how do you handle boxing/shipping (mine doesn't have a case)? There's one on Amazon for $530, I guess I could try to sell through there. On the bay there's one with a case for $375 BiN with no bids....I am a bad capitalist, because it's a pita.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 16, 2012, 08:39:41 AM
On ebay: how do you handle boxing/shipping (mine doesn't have a case)? There's one on Amazon for $530, I guess I could try to sell through there. On the bay there's one with a case for $375 BiN with no bids....I am a bad capitalist, because it's a pita.

One of the graduate students working for me has a small eBay business.  He does everything for me and I give him a cut.

In other words, I'm an idiot when it comes to eBay.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 16, 2012, 11:42:29 AM
Had to stop by the bank at lunch...that  guitar is still there. There's an Alhambra label in it, but the excessive gluing inside and rough fretboard have me concerned. The tag says $300, so I must've talk the owner down on it once already, and it's been sitting there a year since then.

Even at $200, I hesitate to spend that kind of money on a guitar in such rough shape. I'd probably have to at least sand the fretboard and refinish it (with no idea of how!). And the fret wire is too long and would need to be filed down. I'd also have to put in some cheater dots on the side of the fretboard, because it's hardcore no markings at all. Not a problem in the middle of a piece, but I like my crutches.

But it does play nice.

They also had one with a bizarre body shape, kind of a pear cut-away lutey kinda thing. But the fret wire was /really/ messy on that one. Wish I had grabbed the name off it, or at least got the price.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 26, 2012, 11:28:36 AM
Was given a pair of comped tickets by a friend to go see the Guitar Masters tour here last night. Andy McKee, Antoine Dufour, and Stephen Bennett. It was fantastic, and reminded me that I am within reach of playing a lot of the "modern guitar" sort of stuff if I just set my mind to it. I ended up buying 10(!) CDs, so it worked out as much as the tickets in the first place, but it was just fantastic. We were in fifth row or so, and got to go backstage and meet them after the show...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on February 27, 2012, 01:08:00 PM
I just finished up a new microphone build - basically a Neumann U87 copy in design, but only about $180 in parts (replacement capsule, transformer, new FET with a proper bias adjustment, etc):

(http://www.musicalsparks.com/images/aurycle/mic_complete.JPG)

I did a test recording of a cheap acoustic guitar with it:

U87 - Guitar Test Recording (http://www.musicalsparks.com/images/aurycle/guitar_sample.mp3)

This guitar was from Costco for about $100.  You don't need an expensive guitar to either sound good or get good recordings.  This is the main guitar part for a song I'm writing for my 3 year old daughter, and the sound is very usable in a mix.

One thing the more expensive guitars do give:  better playability and better construction.  This guitar is constantly needing to be retuned, and the tuners aren't exactly smooth.  But the sound is fine.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 06, 2012, 11:32:34 AM
Flattus Maximus custom Schecter electric guitar ( Ebay ) (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Flattus-Maximus-custom-Schecter-electric-guitar-/130659917863?pt=Guitar&hash=item1e6bf02027)

Proceeds go to his family.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 14, 2012, 07:40:26 AM
So I was at a meeting at our system building a month ago, talking about that guitar in my last post to a colleague who is a folky. She mentioned she had a hand-made spanish classical with case, looking for $250. I thought it was a bit too good to be true, but she's a super-honest person so I told her I wanted to check it out. Out of the blue yesterday she dropped it off for me to play while I was in a meeting. I couldn't stop pulling it out to play, then played for three hours last night. It's still a fairly low-end instrument, but at least it's not rock-bottom like the one I've been playing.

Reviews say pony up for the next model, which has rosewood back/sides; but I actually like the tone of mahogany thanks to the Baby Taylor. With the cedar top it's got a really nice punchy warm tone without a lot of top end (I guess I'll always favor my old bass sound!). Even so, it's a much deeper yet crisper sound than the el-cheapo. Might look into replacing the tuners and nut at some point, but it plays really well. Definitely the guitar to get me through until I can afford a 'real' classical or flamenco model. Even the case is nice, a kind of solid/gig bag hybrid with an inch of rigid foam.

Very odd to play something with no fret markers. I don't need fretboard markers, but I've always had the cheaters on the side. Going totally marker-less was really rough when playing from memory because I tend to watch myself play and kept getting lost. Playing from the sheet music was much better, since I tend to ignore the fretboard while I do that. Bizarre.

(http://www.olddavy.com/lucida/images/LucidaArtista755Virtuoso.jpg) (http://www.olddavy.com/lucida/l755.html)

I just noticed Miguel said he BUILT that mic. Sheesh! Nice job, man.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 14, 2012, 07:45:16 AM
U87 - Guitar Test Recording (http://www.musicalsparks.com/images/aurycle/guitar_sample.mp3)

Sounds wonderful!  Nice job on the mic build.  I've made effects and cords, but never attempted a mic.  Well done!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on March 14, 2012, 07:30:10 PM
It's actually a mike kit from Aurycle (only $69!):

Aurycle FET Mike Kits (http://www.aurycle.com/aurycle-a460-large-diaphragm-fet-condenser-diy-microphone.html)

I just use the brass body and internal frame and pitch the rest.  You can get them direct from China for $35 but you need to buy 100 of them to get that price.  :wink:  You'll notice identical mikes from Nady, Carvin, MXL, etc, this company OEM's for many mike manufacturers.

I'm building two more:  a U47fet and a KM84.  :grin: I'm a total microphone whore.

BTW, I recently switched to Elixir Nanoweb Phosphor Bronze strings for acoustic....very nice!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 15, 2012, 06:34:58 AM
I need to find some good strings. Nylon string packs I've found around here are too thin, especially the high E. And the low strings are way too brassy/shiny/whatever. I like a little bit of sparkle on it, but given the relatively flat tone of the nylon, it's jarring. I've tried every pack I could find in a local store, but the old rock guys around here like to play on the thinnest strings possible, where I prefer a medium-heavy gauge on electric (a custom 11-based set I order online). I'm not a fan of coated strings, either...I tend to like old strings and only change them when they break or corrode.

Also, putting the new guitar through its paces, I think I'm going to have to raise the action on it. I'm getting some weird tone out of a couple of strings when I'm playing hard (thanks, bass guitar), I kind of pull the string a bit and I think it's slapping the low frets a bit too soon or something. I think the lady I bought it from had it lowered, much like thin strings, lower action seems the rule of the day around here whereas I like it at a low-medium even though that makes me struggle with barres. I play too hard to have it very low...it almost gets harpsichordy at times.

Anyone ever change out a nut and saddle? I've never done it or really anything beyond switching out pickups. I'd like to learn but I would hate to screw up my new guitar doing it. Should I use a bone nut for a classical (seems to be the thing)?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 15, 2012, 07:34:54 AM
Replacing an acoustic guitar nut. (http://www.fretnotguitarrepair.com/repair/acoustic-guitar/nut.php)

I've replaced many and it's a pretty easy process and a great way to adjust action.  I've not done much saddle work, so I'm no help there.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 15, 2012, 08:39:07 AM
Posted this on my blog - finally scratched the itch I'd had for a while and bought a guitar (http://www.garyballardauthor.info/my-latest-toyhobbycreative-outlet/). It's been over 15 years since I played a lick and MAN DO I SUCK. It's amazing how much I forgot, but it's coming back quickly. The callouses are forming, I'm starting to learn the rhythm bits to some songs (got most of War Pigs bar the solo) and I'm trying to do it a little bit right this time by learning a bunch of scales and the actual musical notes instead of just fret numbers. I had forgotten how much I really do like playing the guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 15, 2012, 08:56:32 AM
Here's a link to my stock recommendations.

http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=4508.msg998065#msg998065

And congrats on getting back into it! Everyone should play something.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 15, 2012, 09:46:47 AM
I had forgotten how much I really do like playing the guitar.

Welcome back!  I'm excited that you've picked up a guitar and look forward to your thoughts/updates as the fingerboard starts making sense again.  I'm heading to Minneapolis next week and one of the first things I'm going to do while I'm there is visit a few of the old guitar shops that I used to hang out in while I was a musician there in the 80's.  I'm hoping that it will encourage me to play guitar more and MMO's less.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 15, 2012, 09:57:23 AM
  I'm hoping that it will encourage me to play guitar more and MMO's less.
In this thread I'll admit that thought crossed my mind in my TOR venting.

That triple wipe I mentioned? Alt-F4, play new guitar for an hour. Happy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Salamok on March 15, 2012, 10:00:18 AM
I'll once again recommend Rocksmith (PC version coming in May!) as a pretty fun guitar game, I still haven't tried out the arcadey style minigames in it but the main game gives me reason enough to play/practice for 7 or 8 hours a week.  It does have me turning on the PS3 more which is also having the side effect of more gaming in general.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Oz on March 15, 2012, 12:07:46 PM
I'll second the rocksmith recommendation.  Even at a minimum it will teach you some songs.  I just finished learning eric clapton's Run back to you.  Fun song.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 03, 2012, 10:45:29 AM
Need a little advice:  I've been thinking about buying a nylon string classical guitar for my office at work.  Is this worth the investment in terms of increasing my practice time or should I just keep playing one of my two acoustics?  I find the wider neck of a classical easier to play as a bass player, but mainly want to improve my technique and knowledge of a 6-string fingerboard.

Thoughts appreciated.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 03, 2012, 02:39:32 PM
Not sure what you're asking. Do you think you'll play more with a guitar at work? When I had my old office with the balcony, I'd get in an extra half-hour with the baby taylor (now I just get in that time at home on lunch).

If you think you'll get more mileage out of a classical guitar as a bassist, I agree. Especially if you're going to be doing fingerstyle, it's waaay easier, even if the skills don't completely translate over. I was amazed (and so was the fiancee) when I picked up the bass last week and ripped it up for a while. So some translates back the other way, too.

You'll probably want to look for something with side dots, unless you don't need them. I'm having to learn a new skill set on the new classical because it doesn't have ANY fret markings anywhere.

I love classical guitars, they've always been my favorite going back to high school music class...so I'm a bit biased. But I was also a bassist for long enough that that probably influences the bias, too. I originally got started on the bass because of my early exposure to classical guitar in school.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on April 05, 2012, 10:43:28 AM
R.I.P. Jim Marshall


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 04, 2012, 08:09:29 AM
Picked up a Takemine classical on Wed for cheap at a local music store. 

(http://orcoastmusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/EG128C.jpg)

It has a bridge pickup that works well, but it needs new strings and I may have to cut a new nut for it.  Can anyone suggest some good nylon classical strings?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2012, 02:07:22 PM
I'm using D'Addario Pro Arte. Still trying to dial in which ones I like, the light tension were nice but a bit loosey for me. I'm on normal tension now, the thicker G in particular is nice. Going to work through heavy and extra heavy tension, I have a feeling I might like those as I play pretty heavy strings on the electric. The light tension nylons also have the benefit of being a bit more bendy, though you're still not going to ever get over a step Buddy Guy-style bends out of them. I'm hoping the heavier tensions also resolve the buzz on the open D string...but I think I'll have to swap the nut on it (as I mentioned before, I've never had to do that before). The upside to all this stringing lately is that I can string a damned classical more or less correctly now. I really hated those ball end strings everyone seems to like...I break them easily and they look cheap.

Working at an outreach event for the library I ran into a local weirdo who is married to a cool ex of mine from high school, he's got a ren band with his kid and they have tons of weird instruments. We jammed a bit at his booth, he's going to do a little bit at the local art center and told me to get my shit together. So I'm working on a set list, the absolute ren(ish) stuff is about 15 minutes worth, might be able to milk another 5 with repeats and banter. Most ren acts are pretty loose, so I should get a pretty easy half-hour set by adding on some later pieces (up through romance).

And the chick who runs the art center was saying she wants to learn guitar and also get back into painting. Since I want to learn some painting...have to talk to her about a possible lesson swap.

Really need to sit down and record a few things, but as I've only recently began sharpening my focus it's still about the same level as the last stuff I posted here though my fiancee laughs when she listens, she says she can hear a huge difference. My ear is so critical :) I have been playing quite a bit more, I'm hardly gaming at all the last month or so.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 23, 2012, 07:06:10 AM
Cross posting from the music thread. Really been digging on David Rawlings:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBke402nyIQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzcMWE5FTAo

Just so tasty and perfectly matched to Gillian's songs. Highly recommend their new disc (under her name).

Finally got around to putting the Bream disc in the truck, and I'm in the weird spot of being snobby on it. I just don't like a lot of his interpretation and he tends to be almost mechanical at times, or somehow just faking thte emotive passages. Can't put my finger on it, but it makes me feel better about my interpretations of songs I'd never heard, glad I built my own style before hearing how it's 'supposed' to be played by Bream/Parkening/Segovia/de Lucia/etc. I may be sloppy as hell, but it's got some decent emotive force behind it! :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 25, 2012, 06:37:14 AM
What is this, my guitar blog? I know you guys are playing, what's up? Nebu, how is the classical treating you? This (http://www.amazon.com/Library-Easy-Classical-Guitar-Solos/dp/0825635047) is the book I play out of for the most part, but I'm a tab reader. The stuff I posted a few pages ago is out of there.

Since we saw Primus Sunday, been playing a bit of bass again. Oddly, it's my left hand that's getting sore from friction (the pinky mostly). All the classical has toughened up my right hand pretty well, though it still does get crampy playing true triplets on the Trooper (my old warm-up tune, I'd play it four or five times straight, once I played it ten times over, heh). Les doesn't really play my style, but I've been trying to incorporate a few things and my bass playing sounds hilarious right now because it's part old metal bass playing (ie, what I did for money); part blues guitar (my period from a few years back) and part classical fingerstyle...and trying to put a bit of funk into it (I'm not really a slap/popper and I don't do rt-hand hammering, which limits the catalog, as does my lack of a six string bass). Turns out I remember how to play Southbound Pachyderm, which I used to jam with some guys in the day.

One awesome thing, my triplets are siiiick from all the control I've added with playing classical. I already had a pretty wicked right hand back in the day, it's so cool to pick up the bass after so much neglect and just rip it up. Yay. Watching Les, I commented to the fiancee about how he plays triplets the same way I do, I learned it from my trippy old singer who'd play guitar upside down and horribly, with his fingers. But he did this strummy thing that went rmi rmi rmi rmi rmi, so when I was starting on bass I remembered that. Les was playing a song that was all triplet in the verse, it was cool seeing "my" style done so perfectly...then I went home and found I could play them just as good. Wild.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: jth on May 25, 2012, 07:48:26 PM
Since you asked, here's one "what's up" :)

I had an acoustic guitar 20+ years ago, I played it literally to pieces but never had any teaching or knew how to properly learn so I was never any good at it. Also at the time some of my friends had electric guitars and I couldn't afford one, so my "playing" was often trying to emulate electric on acoustic.

Some months ago I finally realised that wtf, I've had the money to buy any type of guitar for several years, so why haven't I done it? So after some consideration of where to begin I bought a Fender "Stop Dreaming, Start Playing" Affinity Strat package. The amp was crap, but living in an apartment with thin walls I was always going to use headphones anyway.

When I got the guitar it was somewhat a shock how I had forgotten absolutely everything, but also surprising how fast I was able to (re-)learn some basic things. After a month or two when I saw I was still serious about learning, I decided to invest some more, so I bought a Zoom G2.1Nu (http://www.zoom.co.jp/english/products/g2nu/) and a slightly more expensive guitar, Schecter Hellraiser Omen Extreme (http://www.schecterguitars.com/International/Products/Guitar/Omen-Extreme-6.aspx).

Afterwards I found out that for some reason the Schecter wasn't easier to play like I expected, I guess I have too short fingers for it or something so the thinner neck in the Affinity Strat is much easier for me. I still try to use both of them when practising, the problem with the cheap Strat though is that I can only get the neck just about straight, but not curved to get the action as low as I'd like it.

So where I'm now, I still suck at playing but there's been some noticeable progress at least, I've downloaded lots of tabs and been practising parts of songs, also trying to follow "The Rock House Method - Rock Guitar" lessons which I found cheap. I'm also torn between wanting to buy an acoustic and worrying about my thin apartment walls, but if I decide to go for it I've read that a Yamaha C-40 would be a good choice for a first (nylon) acoustic. Also recently I've found myself craving for a bass guitar, I've never even tried one but I might get a cheap one to see what it's about. Only problem is I need to buy some amp or another Zoom for that too.

But all in all, I'm happy that I decided to finally start playing again, and I'm still beating myself for how long I waited to do it.


edit: link corrected


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 25, 2012, 08:30:32 PM
I've also got wicked short fingers, my fiancee sighed in relief after I picked up a $3500 LP Black Beauty and immediately put it down because the neck was a baseball bat. Try out the 61 Gibson SG Reissue, or any of those models with the thin Gibson neck, it's perfect imo. There are so many bum SGs out there, but a good one is the best thing I've played (electric).

You should definitely take the time to hit the music shop to put hands on new guitars, I've never bought anything I haven't played first. There's just so much variation from unit to unit. I'd be wary of moving to a nylon string guitar, the string spacing is wider because it's primarily for fingerstyle (which is why they are great for bassists). Also realize that an electric through a headphone amp is going to be much more neighbor-friendly than an acoustic.

Ditto being cautious about bass, the string scale is much longer than a guitar. My ESP custom is a wicked thin neck as far as string spacing, but the scale is still too long (I'm a decent bass player despite that, but it's a handicap that took years to master). I use my guitar effects when I practice bass (I have an old Boss GT6). Back in the day, I had a few guitar pedals I used on my bass rig when I was starting out, a RAT pedal, flange and wah. Later I just played through the amp direct, though.

As far as learning goes, sounds like you're off to a good start. I just learned by playing, but it was teh long and hard way to do it. I've got a list of my core books a few pages back (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=4508.msg998065#msg998065). Fretboard Logic and the Fretboard Workbook are probably the two most valuable books I own. If you want to learn tunes, online is good but also tends to be sketchy transcription, I like stuff like the Guitar White Pages books to just flip through and learn stuff, a sub to Guitar One might be worth it as well.

Most important thing I can tell you to up your game is learn the CAGED system in Fretboard Logic.  The Fretboard Workbook is a better learning tool, but the explanation in the Logic book worked better for me to unlock the second book's lessons.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 26, 2012, 09:07:40 AM
Nebu, how is the classical treating you?
I feel out of my realm with it.  I can play bass with my fingers and flat pick a 6 string, but fingerpicking eludes me.  I'm also not sure that I like the sound of nylon strings.  They sound GREAT through a modded amp, but a bit cheap without it.  I have a couple of books that I'm going to try out and see if I can develop 'chops'.  I mostly bought the thing to dabble with between projects in my office.

On the bright side, struggling with guitar always makes me play bass more!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2012, 10:07:16 AM
You should grab that Library of Easy Classical Guitar Solos from the link in my last post. Starts super basic and then goes to Bach.

I'm still struggling to integrate a lot of my bass right hand still, I'd love to fully incorporate the triplets I was talking about, but I pound the shit out of the bass when I play so it doesn't really transfer over yet. I was playing some bass last night and my fiancee commented on how good it was sounding and I agreed, kind of amazed. She then asked me when was the last time I played with a pick...maybe three or four times in the last two years, when I've plugged in the SG and even then I used my fingers half the time. Weird.

As far as the sound of nylon, it's always been my favorite - I grew up on Willie Nelson. But a pickup in a classical...even someone as non-traditional as me finds that heretical.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 30, 2012, 06:19:41 PM
I was up at Buffalo Brothers (http://www.buffalobrosguitars.com/) dropping off my Melody Maker this weekend. The taper on the volume pots is uneven and tapping on one of them made the pickup crackle in and out. They are also going to do a general setup on it -- probably the first and only one it has had since it was made in 1962. I look forward to playing it when it gets back, since it already plays really well.

While I was there I noodled around with a brand-new Taylor nylon string cutaway acoustic. It played really nicely, had the ES pickup system, and the neck was as narrow as a steel string. You may want to look into it, jth. The website disagrees on the model -- it was either the 214CE-N or the 414CE-N. It was around $800 new.

Have continued to attend the acoustic meetups in the park. Am probably going to miss the festival and open mic this weekend because I am having my wisdom teeth out on Friday, darn it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 30, 2012, 08:14:23 PM
If it was the 414, you should go buy it right now, it's the one I've been looking at, it runs a solid $1900. Though honestly, I haven't played it since I've been playing more standard classicals, so I bet the neck would be too thin for me. And pfft electronics  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on July 03, 2012, 08:55:37 PM
Thought this was pretty cool.  Not the riffs I would have chosen, but cool nonetheless.

The brief history of Rock & Roll in 100 riffs... done in a single take. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xiC__IjCa2s)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 04, 2012, 04:26:49 AM
14. Black Magic Woman - Santana

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRu7Pt42x6Y

 :oh_i_see:

But yeah, more like '100 riffs I know'. Some were pretty iffy, but gotta give the guy credit for stitching them all together in one take.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on July 04, 2012, 01:42:30 PM
I'm more impressed by all the effects programming he had to do than the actual playing :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 05, 2012, 07:13:18 AM
Probably a cover band vet with a pedal full of presets from gigging. Maybe it's '100 riffs I have presets for in my pedal'  :why_so_serious:

And to add a bit of 'what's up in classical guitarland': another post about my bass triplet technique. I have honed (yet not quite perfected) the Carcassi Etude I linked to before (played poorly here (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/etude7opus60.mp3), need to update that with the new guitar). The triplet pedal tone is played with alternating imi.

I tried to play Tarrega's Recuerdos de la Alhambra (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrtW99qTk6E), which features an even more prominent triplet pedal tone, yet it's played insanely fast and I couldn't wrap my head around the technique....and I was looking through an alternate transcription which put it as ami triplets...the very technique I was talking about on the bass! The problem is when I play bass, I play it very aggressively with the right hand, so dialing down to the level of control and horizontal symmetry required by the piece is wicked fucking hard. I wish I could stop chasing some of the toughest pieces to play, heh.

I also tried to import the technique into the Carcassi piece, which used to be speed-limited by the alternate picked triplet. The ami triplet speeds it up so much that in that technique the piece is limited by the arpeggios instead. Crazy. Going to stick with the alternate picked version, since it's the traditional way it's played, but it's a nice platform to work on the ami technique in a piece I can already play front to back (the A section from memory, even!).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 08, 2012, 11:25:32 PM
could also just be a straight line in and all the effects were done after the take using modeling software..... pretty meh overall... but that said, that dude is playing his guitar and I have been a lazy ass... so props to him and his cabbage



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Minvaren on September 19, 2012, 08:12:16 PM
I'm debating picking up Rocksmith and a REAL GUITAR again in order to learn it for a third time in my life.  To this point, I've been a switched lefty and have learned guitar right-handed previously, but am re-learning everything with my left hand for reasons of my own - and this could be a great aid.  Can someone speak to the difference between learning a native left-handed guitar versus flipping a right-handed guitar?  Face value-wise, there's utility by being able to play most guitars flopped, but I'm curious as to the advantages of the left-handed guitar (minus the whammy bar being in the right place).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on September 19, 2012, 08:17:30 PM
I tried flipping the guitar since my natural inclination is for the left, it wasn't that horrible or different other than tone\volume knobs being in an awkward position depending on make and model, same with tuning knobs.  Assuming you re-string it of course...  I eventually switched to standard right hand configuration because my left hand is so much stronger than my right and it made doing impressive fret work much easier (but caused problems with strumming\picking, but nothing that forcing myself to practice hard didn't fix).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Minvaren on September 19, 2012, 09:30:50 PM
In my brief forays into LH fake guitar (Rock Band/Guitar Hero), my left is keeping FAR better tempo than my right.  At present, my right is stronger than my left, but less coordinated (surprisingly).  I've read that there's a precision/speed tradeoff for working against natural inclination, any thoughts there?

Re-stringing a RH guitar for LH makes sense, but I've heard it negatively affects acoustics with some guitars - plus it kills the versatility of picking up a a RH guitar and just playing.  Is that right?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 20, 2012, 09:41:29 AM
Don't really have any advice on this one. I'd say go for whatever feels most natural. Might be best to get a real lefty if you go that way, but hey; not going to argue with Jimi, either.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on September 20, 2012, 09:53:43 AM
I'd say that it's always better to buy lefty. 

1) You can get a used one cheap.
2) Your cutaway will be in the right place for access to the neck.
3) Unless you use a volume pedal, it's nice to be able to get to knobs and pickup switches easily.
4) Strap locks in the right place is nice.




Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on September 20, 2012, 01:44:16 PM
If the ability to just pick up someone else's guitar and play it is important to you, then just learn it right handed. Otherwise get a real lefty.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 08, 2012, 12:39:24 AM
So tomorrow I will likely pull the trigger on a nylon classical guitar.  Likely a cedar/rw cutaway with a piezo and USP.  I stumbled on a cedar/dao Crafter being dumped for $350 but I have to hear it played first, otherwise it'll just be a Cordoba.  I fooled with the new hybrid Yamahas that everyone has gone crazy about (since Rodrigo y Gabriela) but they just feel really dull w/o an amp and are pretty heavy.  Definitely designed for the nylon "thrasher."

Man oh man I fooled with a nice full-body standard Rodriguez in GC a few days ago and that thing just sang to me though.  But, I really wanna be able to plug in and mess around when I feel like it... rocksmith, computer, recordning, etc.  Also, I really liked the feel of the hybrid necks (they're skinnier and sometimes rounded) and having the ability to reach the higher frets easily.  Alas, you lose a shitton of expression in a cutaway I'm finding.

Anyways, I figure the cutaway will keep me more interested through my beginning phases since I'll be more versatile.  But eventually I aspire to get a full-body solid classical.  I'll keep the cutaway as close to traditional as I can (only a slightly skinnier neck, 12 fret, flat fingerboard, higher action, etc.)  while learning.

I've been having a lot of fun bein all newbsaucy and shopping so far.   :grin:   But I refuse to start collecting these things.

Oh, and this guy... holy shit (I'm sure he's been linked here already):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIoCh6V_F-Y


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 08, 2012, 09:26:46 AM
Asturias is on my short list of tunes to learn. Though it will be a LONG time before I can play it :) I've been chipping away at the ami triplet with Rescuedos de Alhambra (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTgcVhMTRh0), which I talked about a bit a few posts ago, heh.

Also, a much nicer version of Asturias (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx7vOb7GNBg) :)  Even Segovia played it (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1ICFdH7IaA) with a broken ami technique, I hope to get it as fast as the modern kids playing it, thanks to my years at the altar of Steve Harris. But it's taking a lot longer than I expected to reduce the range of motion for a classical.

I've been pining for a Taylor cutaway nylon for a long time, but for now I prefer a full standard classical. Even with my smaller hands it allows at least some of my bass technique to be brought over and I like a flat wide neck. You do not need the higher frets to play classical music on the guitar, because classical guitars do not have upper fret access. Most of my technique practice for the last six months has been transferring bass technique and pinky discipline on broken chords or outre fingerings. I completely eschew electronics in the guitar. Get a boom mic stand and Shure SM57 and you're gtg. And it will sound better, I'm not a fan of integrated mics or pickups, especially on the low end instruments.

Anyway, in guitar news, not much. I've had a couple guys asking where they can buy my cd when I link my pieces as an example of how unhappy I am with my playing  :oh_i_see: So, my project for this winter is to update some recordings and look into what I need to do legally and logistically to release them. The fiancee advises against my initial idea for a title "Great Songs Played Poorly" :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 08, 2012, 12:31:55 PM
If it's original stuff, you can always release it on Tunecore (http://www.tunecore.com/1) or Bandcamp (http://bandcamp.com/). If it's covers, well you're SOL unless it's all classical public domain stuff.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 08, 2012, 01:48:15 PM
If it's covers, well you're SOL unless it's all classical public domain stuff.
It would be the latter, though I might venture into some original composition, like inserting some slayer or sabbath into a piece :) There's one I'm cobbling together that features four classical pieces and some slayer, sabbath and metallica, it's probably ten+ minutes long. I would probably need a big doobie to be able to record it, so I doubt it will make the cut...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 09, 2012, 04:32:34 PM
So I lucked into an older spanish-made Rodriguez cutaway classical with a pickup.  Rodriguez is kinda low on the totem pole but it'll serve me well as a beginner and I tried to stay away from Chinese.  We'll see how this goes, but if she doesn't play well I'll probably go buy a newer full-body Godin.  Supposedly they're building La Patrie all solid wood classicals now for the same pricings as laminate.  I fooled with one today at GC and really liked the sound.

Books...  Doin Hal Leonard complete guitar and the same in classical.  I'll toss in Rocksmith but I'd like to fool around with some other software-based stuff.   I saw the one "for dummies" and another eMedia one.   Anyone have some recommendations??

I'm a former musician.  My theory is fine, but I enjoy muddling through method books.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 09, 2012, 08:12:09 PM
Here's a link to my stock recommendations.

http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=4508.msg998065#msg998065

And congrats on getting back into it! Everyone should play something.

:)

http://www.amazon.com/Library-Easy-Classical-Guitar-Solos/dp/0825635047 is a definite if you want to ease into some classical. Basically all I play these days, just rifle through this book. But that list has some good method things. I've got a pile of classical guitar method books I ignore because I can't read music or seem to learn to.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 09, 2012, 10:21:15 PM
Yah, I've got the advantage of about 10 yrs symphonic experience so that part of it is super-easy.  I just need to learn tab., but I'd prefer to stick with standard notation if possible.
Is Carcassi really the bees knees as I keep reading???  Seems your typical high lvl scale and technical work; boring stuff, but fundamental.

edit: ok Sky so I'm gonna start with leonard's complete guitar (my goto relaxing brainfart general guitar methodbook),  then your fretboard workbook, topped off with "pumping nylon" which is just your all around modern classical method with a lot of technique, and your solo book for songs.  Rocksmith for some pickup fun (1st goal is holiday music [free DLC btw], then some jazz).   Some zen guitar vids from here (http://jaykauffman.com/) for some mind-body technique.   Maybe some telepresence instruction when necessary from him... I really like his style.

My main goal is to be ready for the holidays when everyone will inevitably ask me to play.  :oh_i_see:   If I can do a respectable 'good king wenceslas' I'll be happy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 10, 2012, 09:31:09 AM
Oh yeah, pumping nylon is a bitch. If you already know music and jump into that, you;ll be better than me in a month. Carcassi, I like it. There's a large selection of his stuff in the easy book I use. My favorite composer (besides bach, of course) is Tarrega.

The fretboard book is really nice for gaining an understanding of the layout of the guitar.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 10, 2012, 02:19:28 PM
I've read some of that fretboard workbook online and it almost feels like cheating.  Nice find.
Btw, here's the new precious (it arrives tomorrow).  Gotta find a name for her.  I'm thinkin "Rose" but we'll see.  Bought it from some old cuban guy in Miami (as you can see). 

I know you wont like it Sky and tbh I'm a purest when it comes to classical guitar also, but this will serve me fine utility-wise for now.  I dont want to collect equipment.  I can rock classical, fusion latin, jazz (my main reason for the cutaway and pickup), country twang (willie style), or whatever on this thing.  She's a bit much on the laquer but she's pretty.  Hopefully she projects well enough like the one I tested, but I'm pretty concerned about how succinct she'll sound with each note.  These Rodriguez' tend to be very mellow, haunting type guitars and can sometimes muddle a melody.  I figure the wood's opened up by now, but typically the Spanish versions are fairlly aged before construction anyways.   (I'm turning into a guitar geek)

We'll see.  The guy claims his instructor tried to buy it off of him.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 11, 2012, 07:32:26 AM
I've really been enjoying the cheap spanish 'handmade' guitar I picked up from a co-worker. It's certainly not a pro instrument, but it's a sight better than what's coming out of China. I still have to set a new nut and saddle for it (or rather, learn how to do so), because the lady I bought it from has a light touch and it's set really low. Great for fretting, but I have a very heavy touch (bass player, Iron Maiden, etc) so it frets out alot on me. Also could stand some new tuners, they're pretty cheap. But the woods are nice on it and it sounds good, and for $250 I'm ok with that.

What did you pay for the Rodriguez? I'm a purist, but I could always use a nylon with a cutaway. The first one I fell in love with was a Taylor cutaway (which is $2400 now, I could've had for $800 five years ago).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 11, 2012, 09:16:24 AM
I paid $400 for it.  A tad high probably but new these things were $1200 list and $800 in the shop.  Most of these spanish guitars are still actually made in China, but the Rodriguez I found was made in Spain (an older unit)... which makes it sexier :awesome_for_real:   My requirements were solid cedar-top and rosewood sides.  Something taken care of and has some age.  So this one fit.  Its achilles will be the pickup, as the newer cutaways all sport new tech... blended piezo+undersaddle, tuner, etc.  This one just has a simple LR-Baggs USP.  You can get a cutaway Cordoba c7ce (if you dont mind Chinese) with a badass Fishman pickup for $350.  There's a guy in Kentucky that refurbs and tunes "b-stock" guitars that has a few still left.  I'd definitely buy one of those if you dont care about the slight damage.

If I had a do-over I'd probably spend a bit more and get a new Godin La Patrie (canada), either the Concert (mahogany) or the Presentation (rosewood).  The new ones are all solid-body and sound awesome.  Probably the best bang for the buck in a new guitar right now, not made in China.  Used they still sound great though, but wont be solid-body.

If you're a thrasher though, you'll want the new Yamaha NTX700 (or NCX if you prefer a more classical neck).  $400 at GC new.  It's fairly dull unplugged but a solid instrument that can take the poundings these modern latin players put on em.  The pickup is the best for a non-blended one.  The 900 isnt worth the bump in price.  Just go for the highest of the series in that case -1000?.   Same one rod y gab play on basically.

What are you wanting to do on it?  Whadaya wanna spend?  :grin:   At this point I probably know vastly more than any guitar salesman should.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 11, 2012, 11:15:53 AM
I'm fine with my current guitar (http://www.olddavy.com/lucida/l755.html) until I buy a pro-level instrument. I dig mahogany, and it's got the cedar top and ebony fretboard. Like I said, I'd just tweak a few things but it's pretty awesome.

And again, pickups suck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 11, 2012, 11:23:36 AM
And again, pickups suck.

I like playing my classical through and amp with effects.  It produces sounds that you can't get any other way. 

That and I'm terrible.  Chorus and reverb fix bad technique!  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 11, 2012, 01:04:55 PM
Chorus and reverb fix bad technique!  :why_so_serious:
I hate you so much.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 11, 2012, 03:38:25 PM
I just gotta play some blues/jazz.  And I may do some open mics down the road, so obviously I'll need a pickup.  I really wish "Rosa" had a piezo though.  :(    USPs for classical or latin are an abortion really.
And like I said, I really wanted to fool with software-based learning... eMedia, Rocksmith, etc.  So a pickup makes that a lot easier, let alone easier for impromptu recordings.

Sky, can you recommend a good external card/box to plug into my PC for this??  I cant simply go into a "line in" or "mic in" can I?  I need a pre-amp of some kind yah?  Even though the LR Baggs UST should have one already.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 11, 2012, 05:46:48 PM
I think you underestimate what a luddite I am. I don't know what half of what you're saying is. I'm not a gear guy, I just play guitar. Guitar -> mic -> multitrack. One take, no dubs. Although my multitrack does plug into my PC via USB, but that's just for moving tracks over.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 11, 2012, 07:21:07 PM
Well you generally have 2 types of commonly used acoustic pickups.  Undersaddle transducers and piezos.  Piezo is a fancy word for a mic and is obviously the preferred method for nylon users since it gives the purest sound.  They're installed right around the soundhole usually.  USTs are thin pickups that live underneath the bridge of the guitar and give off a decidedly more "electric" sound.  These days guys are getting pickups that have BOTH and can blend them together or not, as needed.  So at home or doing recordings on a nylon you'd blend it all the way to the piezo/mic and on-stage, in a band, playing with effects, jazz, whatever you'll put in some or all UST.

All this can be plugged into a PC, but you'll typically have to amp/process the signal before it gets to your sound card unless you've got a high-end card in your rig.  These are those boxes they sell at GC to go with pro tools, etc.  Most of these guitar pickups are pre-amps so I'm wondering if that's enough to get a good recording on a simple mobo line-in or mic-in.

Anyways, my guitar came today and it sounds great for a cutaway.  Plenty of volume and depth.  I have a buzz at the bridge though  :uhrr:  So I'm gonna have to take it in to get inspected.  Figures.  Fuckin eBay.  Hopefully it's just the way I strung it.  The guy included a wicked nice hardcase with it though.  Case alone has to be $150.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on October 12, 2012, 12:29:03 AM
Well you generally have 2 types of commonly used acoustic pickups.  Undersaddle transducers and piezos.  Piezo is a fancy word for a mic and is obviously the preferred method for nylon users since it gives the purest sound.  They're installed right around the soundhole usually.  USTs are thin pickups that live underneath the bridge of the guitar and give off a decidedly more "electric" sound.  These days guys are getting pickups that have BOTH and can blend them together or not, as needed.  So at home or doing recordings on a nylon you'd blend it all the way to the piezo/mic and on-stage, in a band, playing with effects, jazz, whatever you'll put in some or all UST.
This is not correct. Undersaddle transducers *are* piezos in that they use piezo-electric crystals to pickup the vibrations transmitted through the bridge. Yes you can call a piezoelectric transducer a "microphone" but that's not normally what somebody means when they say they are using a microphone to amplify their acoustic guitar sound. Those would be condenser or dynamic microphones, typically.

http://www.acousticguitar.com/article/default.aspx?articleid=26793&printable=yes


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on October 12, 2012, 06:47:27 AM
You're right.  Not sayin I was correct, nor that I agreed with the terminology, but I've seen it used to describe a mic.  Probably incorrectly.  Anyways, you can get a Fishman blend for like $50.  Not sure how much it is to install.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 28, 2012, 01:15:14 PM
. I've had a couple guys asking where they can buy my cd when I link my pieces as an example of how unhappy I am with my playing  :oh_i_see: So, my project for this winter is to update some recordings and look into what I need to do legally and logistically to release them. The fiancee advises against my initial idea for a title "Great Songs Played Poorly" :)
Started chipping away at this project, it's so difficult to record classical guitar. No dubs, no fudging, no playing with the mix. I love playing a 4 minute piece perfectly until I'm about 8 bars from the end and flubbing a chord disastrously. Anyway, the first session yesterday yielded a few acceptable pieces, but I've got a looong way to go with this one. Here's a teaser, the A section of Capricho Arabe (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/Capricho_A.mp3), which is all you're going to get as the B section still eludes me (the C would be fine if I could get there).

I started by cleaning everything off my MR8HD, so here's a little nugget that was on there from 2006: Maggot Brain (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3667682/Music/Maggot%20Brain.mp3).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on November 03, 2012, 10:35:42 AM
See Sting's hurricane-benefit piece last night?  Stole the show.   :grin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFbWe-GTEMk

Also, swoon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2a_yfT84KQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx7vOb7GNBg

If you live in the Baltimore area I do believe she gives lessons.  Her and Milos seem to be the frontrunners right now for young guitarists.  Pretty to look at of course.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 03, 2012, 11:22:09 AM
Sky, that sounds pretty good! But it feels too airy and distant for my taste. Are you adding reverb, or recording with a mic set far away?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 03, 2012, 11:37:08 AM
I just put on some scratch verb quickly, it's not the final mix (or even the final recording, probably). I know it sounds horrid, but I'm trying not to blurt too much negativity about stuff these days  :grin:

The
Quote
one from last year
is what I'm shooting for mix-wise, I like the sound of it. It's fun to see the progress I've made in a year, too. It's funny how much better the crappy $70 guitar sounds recorded, the new guitar is much nicer live.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Dren on November 06, 2012, 09:39:29 AM
Complete newb here.  Bit the bullet and got an electric guitar (Rogue,) and got Rocksmith to basically have fun and see how far I can get.  I have to say it has been really fun and is its own kind of therapy  after working at a desk all day.

Since I'm completely starting from nothing, I'm going very slow with the first few songs.  It took me a bit to figure out that I have to go into the song selection and then play with the Riff practice mode thing.  Otherwise, the game was going too fast for me to really learn anything.  You progress to new gigs and songs, but that doesn't really mean you can play it.  The bar for "succeeding" at a song is really low. 

I choose to use the "leveller" mode to step me through the sections of the songs I select.  It quickly finds where I'm competent and then pushes me to get better with practice.

Fun songs, playing along with music, and there are some fun arcade style games to work on finger-play and selective techniques.  Videos and how-to's enough for even a pre-novice like me starting no idea how to play. 

I got it for PS3, but I may also get it on Steam (my first thought.)  PS3 has really long load screens and saving, which gets annoying.  Getting around the screens is awkward too, but workable now that I know where everything is. Biggest issue is I have to completely stop to interact with the gamepad at times...not sure what else could be done there.

My biggest complaint is not having the real notes being displayed at all.  I can read music (piano and violin) and it would be good to relate what I'm playing to sheet music somehow.  I figure I'll just have to add that learning on my own manually at some point.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 06, 2012, 09:52:57 AM
Sounds good. Shame about not showing the notes, that's a missed opportunity. Even to have it enabled as a less graphically fancy option or something.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on November 07, 2012, 11:16:11 AM
Here is a test recording I did with a Neumann U87 and a friends acoustic guitar.  I don't know the brand, but it is a solid spruce top and mahogany sides and bottom.  It has a very tight and controlled sound I think.  Strings are medium gauge phosphor-broze.

http://www.musicalsparks.com/images/u87/u87_guitar.mp3 (http://www.musicalsparks.com/images/u87/u87_guitar.mp3)

This is not a raw sound file:  I did my normal "acoustic guitar only" mix tweaks:  high-passed it at 80Hz, dipped 3dB out of the 1.5kHz range (spanning about 800Hz to about 2.2kHz), and boosted everything above 3kHz by 1.5dB to bring out a bit more of the pick attack.  There is also a slight amount of compression (very little...this track still has over 15dB of dynamic range!) and a bit of room sized reverb.  Mike is about 2 feet away right at about the 12th fret, pointed at the space between the sound hole and the beginning of the neck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 07, 2012, 01:38:48 PM
Very pretty.

It should be for that mic! I should probably upgrade the SM57 I'm recording with...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 08, 2012, 11:36:08 AM
Suck it Guitar Hero! (http://www.youtube.com/user/sleepymanbanjoboys?v=J7MoWPTeYS4&feature=pyv&ad=19764705594&kw=bluegrass%20music)

This is what happens when you hand a kid an instrument instead of a video game... (ok, a really REALLY talented kid).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 08, 2012, 12:11:07 PM
We had this kid that used to play around back in the late 80s, early 90s. Really kicked ass at playing blues guitar even though he was just a little kid.

You may have heard of him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWsDen3la50


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on November 08, 2012, 04:40:20 PM
(ok, a really REALLY talented kid).
Yeah no matter how much I practice I would never be that good.  Some people have talent and the rest of us have to make due with whatever skill we can eke out along the way.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on November 09, 2012, 05:46:58 AM
Yeah no matter how much I practice I would never be that good.  Some people have talent and the rest of us have to make due with whatever skill we can eke out along the way.

I don't know.  When I was playing 8+ hours a day I got pretty freaking good.  It's really about time and muscle memory.  Do the same thing 10,000 times and it becomes ingrained.  The hurdle you have to get over is the thinking about where to go next.  Once you have that down, your speed increases dramatically. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 09, 2012, 06:49:02 AM
It's a few vectors. You've got to have drive, period. You've got to put in the hours of practice. You have to undergo disciplined study, even if it's informal (listening or jamming with blues artists, for instance, vs classical education).

When I was playing every day with the band, we got good. But it was also a little limited because we were an underground metal act in an area with almost no other metal acts doing what we were doing.

When I went to college and was surrounded by every stripe of music and most of the classes were performance-based, and then I'd go home and do homework (more performance, lots of writing), and THEN work on band stuff...I was playing 8-10 hours/day, from 8am to after midnight....every day. I got so good I hit several of my physical/genetic limitations. It was a scary moment when I hit the hard cap of being a bassist with short fingers. I could still do amazing stuff and adapt, but you learn there are just some things that are physically impossible.

Anyway. If you listen to the Smokin' Joe clip I linked, he even talks about having the drive when he was a kid. Without that and years of hard playing, you'll never be much. Most 'talent' is just years of practice. I'm not very talented, I have to work extra hard to get what success I do at my endeavors. That's why I encourage everyone to pick up an instrument, the one that you always love to hear the most. With that love of the sound to drive you, it's just a bit of disciplined practice to get to an enjoyable level of proficiency. Most people that complain they can't do it lack drive or discipline.

(These days I lack both :( )


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Dren on November 09, 2012, 04:31:40 PM
Been playing about 1.5 hours a day on Rocksmith.  I have always respected players, but now I'm in awe.

1.  My finger tips are either in pain, number, or deadened depending on how long it has been since my last session with the game.
2.  I still just can't pick fast enough most times.  I don't have the muscle memory at all so I have to think my way through everything.  Starting to get a glimpse of better things to come.....sort of.
3.  I find myself thinking about songs I hear on the radio and how cool or uncool they are based on the amount of guitar in them.
4.  I feel dirty on days I don't play (much like when I don't exercise....)
5.  My biggest pet peeve is my inability to stop hitting or brushing other strings, not being able to stop tones when I should, or carry them, slides, .....

Yeah, I'm in awe....so much work and dedication.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on November 09, 2012, 04:59:52 PM
Been playing about 1.5 hours a day on Rocksmith.  I have always respected players, but now I'm in awe.

1.  My finger tips are either in pain, number, or deadened depending on how long it has been since my last session with the game.
You can get a grip strength gadget and/or a tool to help build calluses if your fingertips are hurting too much. Examples:

http://www.musiciansfriend.com/accessories/ruff-rider-ruff-grip-callus-builder
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/accessories/planet-waves-varigrip-hand-exerciser

You can also use lighter gauge strings and/or lower your string action to make it easier on your fingers.

Quote
2.  I still just can't pick fast enough most times.  I don't have the muscle memory at all so I have to think my way through everything.  Starting to get a glimpse of better things to come.....sort of.
Most beginning guitar lessons usually have you learning some basic chord shapes and basic strumming patterns first. Rocksmith is weird to me, as somebody who can already fiddle around a bit on a guitar, in that it starts you off teaching these weird hybrid single note rhythm/melody lines. Not sure that's a good way to learn proper guitar technique. In any event, it can help to learn one hand well before learning the other, instead of trying to learn both at once. I.e. for a song learn the fingerings first (especially the hand shifts) and don't worry so much about the picking the strings in time or learning the string pickings first and then learning the fingerings.

Edit: comma movement


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on November 09, 2012, 08:04:04 PM
Dren, please do do not get fooled into thinking that speed is how you determine guitar playing skill! It is a component, for sure, but far from the be all end all. Guitar games emphasize lots of notes because that's the easiest thing for a computer to measure.

Playing less notes well is just as important.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 10, 2012, 07:02:47 AM
1.  My finger tips are either in pain, number, or deadened depending on how long it has been since my last session with the game.

Welcome to hell. The good news is, it goes away. The bad news is, the best way to get through it is to get through it. At this stage in your development, a week break could be enough to go back to square 1. Stick with it, but it sounds like you'll need to back off a bit. Keep up the frequency of sessions, but make them shorter. I wouldn't recommend the stuff Trippy did, but I'm not a gadget guy :)

2.  I still just can't pick fast enough most times.  I don't have the muscle memory at all so I have to think my way through everything.  Starting to get a glimpse of better things to come.....sort of.

This is kind of like playing along with albums. At some point, you need to back off and learn to play things slowly. If there is a complex or difficult section you can't play to speed, break it down into pieces and learn them slowly and individually. Then string them together slowly. Then work on bringing it up to speed. Clean playing is better than fast playing. This last sentence is 'do as I say, not as I did', because I totally played fast and sloppy when I was a kid.

3.  I find myself thinking about songs I hear on the radio and how cool or uncool they are based on the amount of guitar in them.

Bah. Listen to Kofi Burbridge from the Derek Trucks Band hammer on his flute. Listen to horn sections. Check out violinists and mando, banjo guys. Guitar is awesome but only listening to guitar players is very limiting.

4.  I feel dirty on days I don't play (much like when I don't exercise....)

For me, it's like a junkie withdrawal. I keep a cheap classical in a closet in the server room at work. Then I have to 'go work on the server'. Once I bang out a few songs, I can make it through the day.

5.  My biggest pet peeve is my inability to stop hitting or brushing other strings, not being able to stop tones when I should, or carry them, slides, .....

That's another learned skill that at this point in your journey you're going to have to really pay attention to and pick up tricks to work around. The good news is, you will pick these tricks up and it will be your natural playing style. The bad news, it's a bit different for every player. Depends on how you pick, hold the guitar, your hand size and shape, etc. Watch guys who are similar in these things.

Some things to be aware of in general. Deaden strings: on the left hand, you'll want to touch adjacent strings to deaden them. Whether it's a finger on a fretted note touching an adjacent string (lightly) or a non-fretting finger gently resting on the adjacent string(s). With your right hand, deadening strings is actually a great technique called palm muting. See: awesome heavy metal riffs, but it's used in every kind of music to gain a percussive staccato attack. You'll also get a feel for resting your right palm on the strings for rest notes.

Yeah, I'm in awe....so much work and dedication.
Go back and read how much I tear myself up about my playing. I've been playing guitar and bass on and off since 1984. It's a never ending journey of self-improvement, which is pretty awesome. On the upside, you WILL get better if you stick with it. 1.5 hours a day is a great start towards being a good guitarist. Kudos to you, the first year is BY FAR the most difficult. And it's a skill that will provide enjoyment for you (and hopefully others!) for the rest of your life.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 10, 2012, 07:06:54 AM
Most beginning guitar lessons usually have you learning some basic chord shapes and basic strumming patterns first. Rocksmith is weird to me, as somebody who can already fiddle around a bit on a guitar, in that it starts you off teaching these weird hybrid single note rhythm/melody lines. Not sure that's a good way to learn proper guitar technique. In any event, it can help to learn one hand well before learning the other, instead of trying to learn both at once. I.e. for a song learn the fingerings first (especially the hand shifts) and don't worry so much about the picking the strings in time or learning the string pickings first and then learning the fingerings.
The weird thing is, this sounds like how I learned to play. I didn't know real chords until I had been playing a couple years. Hell, I didn't learn a power chord for at least six months after my band had been playing, we all started together. We just made single note melody covers of Priest and AC/DC songs, then mostly did originals because the covers were so bad. This ended up being awesome because it was natural for us to write music.

Anyway. Learning by playing along with albums is a valid way to do it. I'm still a weak strum player and go for broken inverted chords played in finger arpeggios and weird stuff like that as a natural thing. Takes all kinds.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on November 11, 2012, 05:48:33 PM
I've been doing pretty well of late.  Work stuff has limited some of my practice time but like other beginners I was destroying the tips of my fingers (mostly nerve damage), so it's helped to take a break.  I've been taking a pretty traditional/musical approach though.  It's a bit more work but since I've already got a musical background it'll definitely pay dividends later on.  It's for these reasons my Rocksmith hasnt even been opened yet. (as my fingers just cant take the abuse, even on a nylon and it's EXTREMELY important to understand classical guitar notation if you can)

Anyways, right now I'm using very abbreviated "pumping nylon" warmup techniques and a VERY beginning classical guitar method book by Lenard pub.  Unlike some other methods (like the Mel Bay) they're focusing more on understanding the notation and fingerings in melody/baseline.  Chords arent even a part of the picture yet; which to me is smart.  You can't learn chords well w/o understanding the notes behind them first.  Also, it's more important in a classical imo to get used to playing baselines first rather than chords.  And good right-hand technique is imperative to learn from the start.

I WAS using a generic guitar book method but I started to realize that I was getting into bad habits (like a weak right-hand) and immediately moved to the strictly classical method (albeit a modern technique).  Once that book is done, which is basically just getting you through all the strings maybe halfway up the neck,   I'll start focusing more on the technique book (pumping nylon) and mastering chords with my chord workbook.  And TRY to work through the classical solos book.

The best time I've had so far is showing up at my mom's for the first time with my guitar and dueting with her as she played her new Hohner accordion.  I'm really regretting not picking up the instrument earlier in my life.  Helluva useful thing to know how to play, and very gratifying.  I believe Beethoven said "the guitar is like a small orchestra."  He aint lyin.

Anyways, for you non-classical pickers I highly recommend the other method book I was using.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000RQ73GQ/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=0881881392&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1VG0V33DAT75N6W2KRVK

If you're goin classical I'd stay away from it until you've got your basic techniques down; then you can dip into it for other guitar techniques.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 14, 2012, 09:18:24 AM
2.  I still just can't pick fast enough most times.  I don't have the muscle memory at all so I have to think my way through everything.  Starting to get a glimpse of better things to come.....sort of.

This is kind of like playing along with albums. At some point, you need to back off and learn to play things slowly. If there is a complex or difficult section you can't play to speed, break it down into pieces and learn them slowly and individually. Then string them together slowly. Then work on bringing it up to speed. Clean playing is better than fast playing. This last sentence is 'do as I say, not as I did', because I totally played fast and sloppy when I was a kid.

Totally this. Trying to play everything at actual speed is part of what discouraged me as a younger kid trying to learn to play. Now that I've picked it back up, I've realized you have to learn to play the notes well before you can play them fast. Doesn't mean I don't just hammer away some nights but it's mostly as a way to build up finger dexterity more than learning to play a particular stretch fast.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on November 21, 2012, 07:13:44 PM
I've learned that it's much easier to play/learn if my sheet music is orientated so I can somewhat see my hand and fretboard.  This means keeping the stand and music off to the left a bit.  It's a bit tough getting used to looking to the left, but my unconscious mind has an easier time telling my fingers what to do w/o relying solely on muscle memory.  I leave my right hand to fend for itself.

Coming from a woodwind background, it's the main reason why it's technically simpler to blow through a method book on a wind instrument (assuming you have the chops) then it is on guitar, because one can always see their fingers unless they're playing something like flute.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 21, 2012, 09:33:17 PM
When I'm playing sheet music, I never look at the guitar. When I'm playing from memory, I look at the guitar a lot. It's weird.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on November 24, 2012, 10:20:06 AM
You're not actually looking at the guitar, just keeping it in your line-of-sight.  It's a subconscious thing.  Eventually the fingers will move on their own anyways, and 'thinking' just gets in the way.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 24, 2012, 12:10:39 PM
Ok.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: craan on November 24, 2012, 05:11:24 PM
So I finally noticed this thread awhile ago and have been slogging through it.  After about 10 pages I went out and got my first guitar.  I'm borrowing one of my brother's amps while he's at college.

(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44560/guitar.jpg)

I took 2 lessons from a local instructor but I didn't get along with him.  For whatever reason I am extremely slow at picking up finger positions and I just get more nervous and more derpy when I have to keep asking him to slow down and repeat things.  So I grabbed a few numbers for lessons from another music store.  I was going to start calling but stumbled across http://justinguitar.com/ (http://justinguitar.com/) and so far its right up my alley.  He's pretty clear and I can pause/go back, etc until I feel comfortable.

And I wanted to say thanks to Sky, stray, Miguel, Nebu, Raph, and everyone else (sorry, forgetting some names).  Almost all of the talk is way, way above my head but I like immersing myself in it.  Was interesting to wade through 50+ pages of this thread spanning a few years.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 26, 2012, 09:40:10 AM
I was going to start calling but stumbled across http://justinguitar.com/ (http://justinguitar.com/) and so far its right up my alley.  He's pretty clear and I can pause/go back, etc until I feel comfortable.

I've used some of his lessons myself. He's pretty good.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 26, 2012, 11:47:06 AM
And I wanted to say thanks to Sky, stray, Miguel, Nebu, Raph, and everyone else (sorry, forgetting some names).  Almost all of the talk is way, way above my head but I like immersing myself in it.  Was interesting to wade through 50+ pages of this thread spanning a few years.
:thumbs_up:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on December 05, 2012, 05:40:40 AM
Sky, how in the crap nebula do you record an entire song on Classical w/o making a single goddamned mistake (whilst reading sheet music mind you, not playing by memory)?  It's frustrating.  Is it considered 'cheating' if I record in composite??   :grin:  Y'know, I'll hit a few lines perfect.  Stop recording.  Hit the next few lines.  Etc.  Then add em all together.   :awesome_for_real:  

In other news, I've grown weary of my strings already (especially the G string) and ordered some new-fangled Dogal Diamantes.  Ever tried em?  I might just use em for the trebles, we'll see.  And I added an armrest so I can get bloodflow back into my arm.   :oh_i_see:

Btw, if you're interested in armrests, definitely use this guy:
http://www.krisbarnettguitars.com/

I didnt put his custom armrest on this particular guitar (not worth it), but if you've got something fancy it seems like it'd definitely be worth it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 05, 2012, 11:23:25 AM
Random guitar stuff.

My daughter has decided her old 3/4 classical is not for her, and keeps borrowing my Baby Taylor. Thinking of getting her one for Xmas.

A while back I mentioned I took the '62 Gibson Melody Maker in to get the electronics looked at. Well, they did a setup on it, and warned me that i would need to bring it back in within a couple of months to gt readjusted. Sure enough, it has developed a buzz on the G string at the 7th fret. And ONLY there. Sigh.

Also, the pickup in my Blueridge has stopped working. Which means that I am in the market for an acoustic guitar pickup to replace it with... given that this is my main guitar, I kind of want to put in something moderately nice. The commonest use of the pickup is as an additional signal when recording. Ideas? I do have a Dean Markley soundhole pickup laying around, but I would really prefer something that I can run to the existing hole for the jack (it's not at the pin, it's one of those where it's on the lower bout on the side).

I see a visit to Buffalo Bros in my near future...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on December 05, 2012, 12:13:19 PM
Also, the pickup in my Blueridge has stopped working. Which means that I am in the market for an acoustic guitar pickup to replace it with... given that this is my main guitar, I kind of want to put in something moderately nice. The commonest use of the pickup is as an additional signal when recording. Ideas? I do have a Dean Markley soundhole pickup laying around, but I would really prefer something that I can run to the existing hole for the jack (it's not at the pin, it's one of those where it's on the lower bout on the side).
What pickup is/was in there now? It sounds like you are already using an external mic(s) so you want something you can blend in with that? What kind of playing are you trying to record?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2012, 01:40:43 PM
Sky, how in the crap nebula do you record an entire song on Classical w/o making a single goddamned mistake (whilst reading sheet music mind you, not playing by memory)?  It's frustrating.  Is it considered 'cheating' if I record in composite??   :grin:  Y'know, I'll hit a few lines perfect.  Stop recording.  Hit the next few lines.  Etc.  Then add em all together.   :awesome_for_real:  

In other news, I've grown weary of my strings already (especially the G string) and ordered some new-fangled Dogal Diamantes.  Ever tried em?  I might just use em for the trebles, we'll see.  And I added an armrest so I can get bloodflow back into my arm.   :oh_i_see:

Btw, if you're interested in armrests, definitely use this guy:
http://www.krisbarnettguitars.com/

I didnt put his custom armrest on this particular guitar (not worth it), but if you've got something fancy it seems like it'd definitely be worth it.
Hm. Lots of practice. My band was a live band, we played a LOT every day, several hours for us and a couple hours for fans, often blurring together. So that also influenced our recording, we used to use a boom box and just record full takes of a song. When we did our first demo, the jazz guy was impressed because we booked an hour and had everything in one take. We had enough time for a second take on one song we wanted to try a bit differently and still had time to mix it down. So I never really got into punching in and out, though I do like multitracking (like my version of Maggot Brain).

I'm using D'Addario Pro Arte. I think I'm on medium tension, I've been trying different sets but I do like the brand. Never considered an arm rest, though it now feels odd playing without a foot rest. I was playing the Gibson last night (the SG) and used my foot rest and left leg stance!

But to go back to your initial question...I'll let you know how to record an entire classical track without making a mistake when I actually do it :) That Capricho track I linked earlier is from memory, though...but you'd laugh if I tried to launch into the B section. It's played with a 3rd fret barre position for F major, which is just evil. I can barely play it at all, much less play it at speed, much less have it record-worthy.

Raph, I don't use pickups in my acoustics, sorry! But speaking of acoustic mics, how crappy is this mic (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002LASBRG)? I almost bought it on black friday and I should have enough amazon reward points to buy it next month. I still need to raise the action on my guitar before I can record for reals, but it might also be nice to get a better-than-SM57 mic to record through.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 05, 2012, 05:45:13 PM
What pickup is/was in there now? It sounds like you are already using an external mic(s) so you want something you can blend in with that? What kind of playing are you trying to record?


If you go through the thread you can find many many examples of what I tend to record. :) Fingerpicking, flatpicking, strumming. Stuff from fingerstyle pieces to percussive to folk rock and whatever else in between.

The pickup in it now is just some undersaddle piezo thing, no idea what exactly. It never sounded good until I got the Shenandoah Jr acoustic amp, and even then it still has that piezo sound to it.

Who knows, at some point I might actually play out, in which case I would like to have something that actually holds the tone of the wood.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 05, 2012, 05:53:12 PM
Raph, I don't use pickups in my acoustics, sorry! But speaking of acoustic mics, how crappy is this mic (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002LASBRG)? I almost bought it on black friday and I should have enough amazon reward points to buy it next month. I still need to raise the action on my guitar before I can record for reals, but it might also be nice to get a better-than-SM57 mic to record through.

Well, the reviews call it comparable to an AT3035. You have heard stuff of mine on the 4033, which people say is comparable to THAT. :)

There are a lot of threads on gearslutz... here's one: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/397313-mxl-r44-large-ribbon.html

If you haven't used a ribbon or large condenser, be aware that sensitivity vs gain is a way different sort of issue from a 57... those mics will literally pick up something from the next house.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on December 05, 2012, 06:05:36 PM
Speaking of, how exactly would you go about getting rid of that buzzing on a particular string\fret combo?  I've got a spare guitar that is fun to play but it has a buzzing and bad vibration on the G string on about half of the frets.  It doesn't adversely invade the sound with the amp, but it sure is noticeable when I'm playing as I can feel it in my fingers and hands and it REALLY annoys me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 05, 2012, 06:43:19 PM
Check the neck, but if it's just the G it's probably a bad fret or two, or maybe it's set too low at the bridge.

My alvarez has a hump that would do the elephant man proud, but it only really affects the high E string 10+...still enough to drive me insane. My bass also developed a buzz in storage that I need to track down someday.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on December 05, 2012, 11:18:49 PM
What pickup is/was in there now? It sounds like you are already using an external mic(s) so you want something you can blend in with that? What kind of playing are you trying to record?
If you go through the thread you can find many many examples of what I tend to record. :) Fingerpicking, flatpicking, strumming. Stuff from fingerstyle pieces to percussive to folk rock and whatever else in between.

The pickup in it now is just some undersaddle piezo thing, no idea what exactly. It never sounded good until I got the Shenandoah Jr acoustic amp, and even then it still has that piezo sound to it.

Who knows, at some point I might actually play out, in which case I would like to have something that actually holds the tone of the wood.
I'd go with a soundboard transducer like a K&K system or maybe a combo transducer and (internal) mic if you want to play live. However those systems typically come wired with their own endpin jacks and I'm not sure how hard it would be to modify one to connect through your existing side panel.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on December 06, 2012, 12:46:34 AM
Raph, I don't use pickups in my acoustics, sorry! But speaking of acoustic mics, how crappy is this mic (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002LASBRG)? I almost bought it on black friday and I should have enough amazon reward points to buy it next month. I still need to raise the action on my guitar before I can record for reals, but it might also be nice to get a better-than-SM57 mic to record through.
It should be okay if you have a good preamp. Ribbon mics typically require more gain than a condenser or dynamic mic.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 06, 2012, 10:36:35 AM
Sky, what do you run into from the mic? Trippy is right that preamp is going to be important with a mic like that. For that matter, do you have phantom power?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 06, 2012, 11:29:24 AM
I plug mics into my little MR8HD mixer unit. It's got phantom on the XLR ins. I don't have it yet, but reading a bit about it I think I might.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on December 07, 2012, 02:18:36 PM
So I tried out those carbon-nylon strings (the Diamantes).  They're made in Venice.  Could immediately tell the difference (so could the gf, and she's got no ear for music).  Much brighter trebles, fuller G, and lows that hit a bit harder though maybe not as expressive as the pro artes.   Also much longer sustain.  Since they're getting the same/better sound from lesser tension (even though they're rated medium or hard and at the same diameters as traditional strings) the soundboard is opened up too.  And they're much easier on my fingers.  I anticipate the bass getting better over time as well once they break in.

Give em a try.  You can get em from Strings By Mail.  Pricey though.  $20 for mine shipped.   :oh_i_see:   You can even go higher tension if you'd like and get the same feel on your fingers as lesser tension.  Seems like a lotta folk are matching them with the pro arte basses, but I'm gonna give it a few months to work in before doing that.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 09, 2012, 08:32:55 PM
Shh, don't tell my daughter but I got her a Baby Taylor for Xmas.

In the process, tried out the GS Mini. Felt like an upgrade from the Baby, but a bit outside the budget given that I don't know if she'll stick with it.

Anyway, that's not why I am here, I did a new song and posted it up. First one I have posted in ages (have been holding back some of them, thinking of working towards another CD). So it's here, along with the chords and the words and all the recording details. Recorded some bits in kind of a hurry (vox especially)... so not the greatest mix.

But it's a song about ZOMBIE CHRISTMAS TREES!! So you must click.

http://www.raphkoster.com/2012/12/09/the-sunday-song-zombie-christmas-trees/

Direct MP3 link:

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/ZombieChristmasTrees.mp3 (http://www.raphkoster.com/music/ZombieChristmasTrees.mp3)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 10, 2012, 08:04:39 AM
Recorded some bits in kind of a hurry (vox especially)... so not the greatest mix.

What are you, me? :)

You're an odd bird, Raph. It's a funny song, but the 'drums' were driving me nuts. All the stringwork, excellent as always.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Viin on December 10, 2012, 09:50:35 AM
Starting to get interested in guitar again, but still don't have time for it yet. This looks like fun though:

How to REALLY play Norwegian Wood on guitar like the Beatles (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ysBRpSThuw)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on December 10, 2012, 02:23:01 PM
Starting to get interested in guitar again, but still don't have time for it yet. This looks like fun though:

How to REALLY play Norwegian Wood on guitar like the Beatles (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ysBRpSThuw)


Anyone have the notation or tab for this?  I'm pretty much required to learn it now.   :oh_i_see:
Damned Norwegian family.

This my fav. version btw:
PM Dawn (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY0bh0pbHSE&list=AL94UKMTqg-9Bxfk8vuzOgk8jINk1RCt7P&index=3)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 10, 2012, 02:38:09 PM


You're an odd bird, Raph. It's a funny song, but the 'drums' were driving me nuts. All the stringwork, excellent as always.

I just striped down two generic drum loops from ACID, one with brushes and one with actual hits. They are pretty generic. :) I originally only had them in there as a metronome (I find I play MUCH better in time to actual drumming than to a click) and I just didn't take them out. And I used two so it cued me between parts of the song.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 10, 2012, 03:47:57 PM
In my dream setup I'd like to have enough tracks to play to a drum track and then once I've got a bunch of stuff down go back and play live drums over the top. I'm not great, but it's not horrid, either. Water-proofing the basement was a good (expensive) first step in that direction.

My mother is getting a Macbook Pro for xmas, so I'm 'setting it up' aka playing with it, mostly poking around garageband which is pretty nifty. I used Acid back in the day, it's similar to how I remember that interface as far as loops and stuff go. I'd love to hook that up to a decent sized mixer and put together a for-real small studio.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 11, 2012, 10:03:47 AM
I have been playing with migrating to Reaper fo a while now. Since I am on PC, GarageBand is not an option. Reaper is supercheap and very powerful.

ACID seems to be end of life at this point... no update in like five years.

Maybe you can lay down drum tracks for me. ;)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on December 11, 2012, 10:16:09 AM
If you are on PC's, try out Mixcraft (http://www.acoustica.com/mixcraft/index.htm). I bought it a while back and have been futzing around with it. I record guitar tracks with an M-Audio Fast Track using Guitar Rig for amps and effects, and Mixcraft for the recording software and virtual instruments. There are a shitton of free/low-cost VST plugins that work with it and it's every bit as good as GarageBand for $75. It comes with a really good set of virtual instruments, including a pretty decent set of drums styled as a heavy metal drum kit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 11, 2012, 12:53:41 PM
My next step to a good studio is a killer, though. To mic a drum kit I need at least 6 XLR ins for the audio interface if I go DAW. Even now I only have 4 XLR simultaneous recording with the MR8HD.

Then mics, then a laptop, it adds up. Still, I hope to get something going in the next couple years. The classical project is a good start to give some focus. I think I will pick up one of those cheap ribbons sooner than later; I also have to get the guitar set up. Either have the local guru do it or practice on my cheap classical...I have to at least add a shim to the bridge, maybe even a new nut. I've just never done it.

Then there are legal things I'll have to look into if I want to start releasing stuff. Boo. More research :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 12, 2012, 07:23:53 AM
There are no cheap  options for that many ins. Believe me, I looked.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 27, 2012, 06:49:53 PM
The Baby Taylor for the daughter was a hit :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 28, 2012, 06:38:04 AM
The Baby Taylor for the daughter was a hit :)
Of course it was! Those are really nice little guitars.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 06, 2013, 12:53:33 PM
New toy to help with the synth instruments that I have been using in my arrangements: http://www.amazon.com/ARTURIA-Analog-Experience-Laboratory-Controller/dp/B004SL8XFG

Setting up the programming is a pain, but already I can get WAY more expressive stuff from my fake strings and horns and the like.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 07, 2013, 07:12:37 AM
New toy = cool!

I've got to let the budget recover from all the plastic toys I bought last year, then I think I'm going to start socking away cash for some upgrades to the msuic setup. Now that my basement's dry I can put in a permanent jam room down there. At the very least I want to get a decent drum kit.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 10, 2013, 10:44:35 PM
Posted new tune: http://www.raphkoster.com/2013/02/10/the-sunday-song-freedom/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Soln on February 16, 2013, 04:22:42 PM
Johnny Marr has a solo album.  And he's touring.  Now.  And the album (first cut (http://youtu.be/d2W8aVDxeBY)) is good.  i.e. "bright".   :star:   

oldhappyweepyguy.gif


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 24, 2013, 03:57:15 PM
Got my Blueridge and Gibson electric back from the shop.

Blueridge had the pickup replaced. They put a Fishman in, since it had the knobs in the same place. New saddle, too. The pickup is dramatically better than the old one. It moved the jack from the side to the endpin, which I will have to get used to. :)

The Gibson got a fair-sized going-over. The other shop had done a setup on it, lowered the action, and it resulted in bad buzz on the 9th fret. Blue Guitar went in and leveled all the frets, cleaned out the electronics, and in general babied it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 25, 2013, 06:41:43 AM
I've been slacking so bad on guitar lately. Have to get the chops back up to start recording again now that my 'studio' is unfrozen. With the basement waterproofed, I'm hoping to get it a little bit finished and setup up more permanently in there, so the guitars can adjust to that environment rather than the radical changes at each end of my (small) house.

Current project I'm slacking on: learning Bistro Fada. It's actually fairly simple to play, it's just remembering all the bits. Not sure if I'm going to incorporate Wrembel's picking style, he calls for a downstroke on every string change which is pretty tough for me. I just play and don't pay any attention to how I pick. Also working on La Pompe, 'the pump', the manouche style of playing chords. It's also fairly simple but you have to swing into it and I keep getting the accents wrong :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ghost on April 25, 2013, 05:45:58 PM
So I inherited a pretty kick ass guitar from my mother in law.  I've never played.  Can you recommend any way to start on my own, Sky?  I don't really have time for lessons or hanging out at the guitar shop right now. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 25, 2013, 06:35:55 PM
(in before the Rocksmith plug by Sky)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on April 25, 2013, 09:34:27 PM
So I inherited a pretty kick ass guitar from my mother in law.  I've never played.  Can you recommend any way to start on my own, Sky?  I don't really have time for lessons or hanging out at the guitar shop right now. 
Can you read sheet music?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 25, 2013, 10:36:04 PM
Learn how to make a G, a C, a D, an E, and an A.

Then to go a site like ultimate-guitar.com and find songs you know and love that happen to just use those chords. Do not try anything that has tablature yet. Just chords.

Then practice until you get to Carnegie Hall. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 26, 2013, 05:48:25 AM
Learn how to make a G, a C, a D, an E, and an A.

Then to go a site like ultimate-guitar.com and find songs you know and love that happen to just use those chords. Do not try anything that has tablature yet. Just chords.

Then practice until you get to Carnegie Hall. :)

After that, Am, Em, and bar chords.  Then you can play everything every written for pop music since 1980!  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 26, 2013, 06:53:33 AM
What kind of guitar? What kind of music do you want to learn?

The downside to Rocksmith is you're not learning any real notation.

I should set up a google hangout for lessons to fund my KS habit :p


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 28, 2013, 06:52:41 PM
Been playing a bit of bass lately, picked up some Rush tabs and been messing around with that stuff. Wrote a nice jam over the A/F section of La Villa Strangiato. Messing around showing the old lady a few things and stumbled on an old piece I had written at the tail end of my professional stint (actually backed into it jamming over Southbound Pachyderm by Primus). So cool to have remembered that after all these years, the last attempt at a band had two guitarists with no clue of what to play over it. That's actually what convinced me to hang it up, nobody could write!

I've got to move a few things around but should be able to get my little recording set up in its more or less permanent home pretty soon, hopefully before I forget it for another ~18 years :|


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ghost on April 29, 2013, 06:12:32 AM
What kind of guitar? What kind of music do you want to learn?

The downside to Rocksmith is you're not learning any real notation.

I should set up a google hangout for lessons to fund my KS habit :p

It's a Gibson ES-175 with a single pickup, as opposed to the model with two pickups.  As far as reading sheet music, I used to be able to, but haven't messed with it in over 20 years so it would take me some time to pick that back up. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 29, 2013, 06:37:49 AM
Bastard! That's a really nice guitar.

You still haven't said what you're interested in learning. Raph's hippy stuff or what? I've got a good mechanics booklist in this thread, but some people just want to learn chords and be done with it. I've set up my list to be more mechanics and agnostic to style, but it's also a bit more of an advanced learning path, ramps up really quick.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ghost on April 29, 2013, 07:08:03 AM
I'm mostly interested in learning Reign in Blood, in its entirety.   :awesome_for_real:

Just kidding.  I really haven't thought about what I'd like to play that much, to be honest.  Maybe if I just started out with some chords, to get used to playing? 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 29, 2013, 09:00:35 AM
Well, like Raph said, then. Learn the cowboy chords for C,A,G,E and D. With those basic shapes you can play pretty much everything else.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on April 29, 2013, 10:11:45 AM
It's a Gibson ES-175 with a single pickup, as opposed to the model with two pickups.  As far as reading sheet music, I used to be able to, but haven't messed with it in over 20 years so it would take me some time to pick that back up. 

I want a picture!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ghost on April 29, 2013, 10:26:23 AM
Okay.  I'll take one when I get home.  My buddy that is in a band down here (Band of Heathens (http://www.bandofheathens.com/)) fixed it up and played it for about a year. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Engels on April 29, 2013, 11:32:03 AM
Always comforting to know that a dentist wants to learn Reign in Blood. I'll be over here rocking myself in a fetal position.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 29, 2013, 11:33:29 AM
At least he didn't say Angel of Death.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 29, 2013, 11:35:15 AM
Neither song is very easy to learn. Mostly because it's played at WWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!! speed.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: ghost on April 29, 2013, 07:34:55 PM
It was either that or James Taylor.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 29, 2013, 11:37:48 PM
I just looked up Angel of Death and it's actually not very hard, just fast. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on April 30, 2013, 05:32:30 AM
I just looked up Angel of Death and it's actually not very hard, just fast. :)
Exactly! ;-)  Raining Blood is actually extremely simple once you get the speed down.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 02, 2013, 06:14:04 PM
We jinxed him.

http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/1560534/slayer-guitarist-jeff-hanneman-dead-at-49
 :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on May 02, 2013, 06:19:54 PM
Sad panda =(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 03, 2013, 09:33:59 AM
Way too young. I am /sadf.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 13, 2013, 07:32:50 PM
I've been playing stuff with a group of mostly older acoustic folkies in a local park a couple of times a month. It's a Meetup thing. Well, the group is partially sponsored by the local Folk Heritage Society. And that means that the group got a performance slot at the little folk festival in that park this summer.

And our main organizer is ill. So I am now roped into helping out on this. We're the opener for the festival!

We have 3 weeks to finalize a set, with no leader. Should be interesting. :) At least it's all stuff like Oh Susanna and Home on the Range.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 14, 2013, 06:58:47 AM
Request: Bury Me Not on the Lone Prairie.

Love that tune.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on May 16, 2013, 10:24:09 PM
edit - already answered


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on May 28, 2013, 11:18:20 AM
I don't post in this thread often, but I realized something interesting the other day and wanted to ask some other musicians if it's universal.

Playing music is maybe the only thing that doesn't allow me to mentally multitask.  With anything else I do, my attention is almost always divided, or at least can be, but when my mind is on a piece of music, I can't carry on a conversation, I can't think about work, I can't fit anything else in my head.  Doesn't matter if it's a song I'm working on learning or one I know by heart.  I think this is why when I'm stressing out about something my instinct is to grab a guitar; it's the only thing that'll shut my brain off (or at least repurpose it).

Is this something inherent to music, or is it just that my brain isn't wired as well for music as it is for other stuff?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 28, 2013, 11:32:19 AM
Same happens to me, with the exception of doing patter to an audience. I can strum on repetitive chords and make announcements, but as soon as I have to actually mentally engage with something coming at me, I find it very hard to answer. My kids have gotten used to coming up to me, saying something, expecting a response, and not getting one. Sometimes, it takes me like 45 seconds to "break out of the trance" and actually answer.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on May 28, 2013, 11:45:26 AM
I don't post in this thread often, but I realized something interesting the other day and wanted to ask some other musicians if it's universal.

Playing music is maybe the only thing that doesn't allow me to mentally multitask.  With anything else I do, my attention is almost always divided, or at least can be, but when my mind is on a piece of music, I can't carry on a conversation, I can't think about work, I can't fit anything else in my head.  Doesn't matter if it's a song I'm working on learning or one I know by heart.  I think this is why when I'm stressing out about something my instinct is to grab a guitar; it's the only thing that'll shut my brain off (or at least repurpose it).

Is this something inherent to music, or is it just that my brain isn't wired as well for music as it is for other stuff?

I don't find this to be unique to music; it may just be that nothing else you currently do requires that high a level of concentration. I find I get a similar result at kendo practice for example.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on May 28, 2013, 11:54:50 AM
My ability to multitask is directly related to how much I'm playing.  When I was gigging 4 nights a week on a consistent set list, I would often find myself mentally wandering while playing the bass, singling, and playing taurus pedals with my feet.  There's a point where you get SO in the groove that you stop thinking about playing altogether.

To be fair, this never happens during the creative process (writing, arranging, production, etc).  That always requires 100% focus.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on May 28, 2013, 05:49:40 PM
Is this something inherent to music, or is it just that my brain isn't wired as well for music as it is for other stuff?
If I know the song really well and whatnot, I can carry on a conversation or read other material while playing along.  It won't necessarily be perfect but it won't be terrible either.  Being creative and committing things to memory, I can zone out and not pay attention to anything for hours.  I do this with other tasks too, depending on how complicated or how much processing power is involved.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 29, 2013, 07:08:57 AM
Count me as another who has to focus on guitar. Just the way it is, when I'm playing I can't do anything else. But it's even hard for me to play something repetitive, I'll start wandering around and jamming on things, an odd juxtaposition of extreme focus and adhd.

When I started playing blues and singing a few years back, I found I had to be real picky with song selection and work with things played by people who can't play anything complex while singing. Luckily, one of my very favorites, Buddy Guy, is the same way.

My fiancee hates when I play when there is other music on...and I'm playing a different song. When I'm playing it's extreme focus, the tv or radio or whatever fades into the background and I can't really hear it anymore. But when I'm jamming with others, I'm constantly picking up on what they're doing and jamming off that, especially drummers. Drummers love jamming with me because I'll hear the little patterns they throw in and build off them, it's a lot of fun to get that going when I'm playing bass.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 01, 2013, 04:19:45 PM
Well, we played our set today at the Sam Hinton Folk Fest. It was fun. Had a decent little crowd. I did an open mic set afterwards too. I should do this more. Sigh.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 01, 2013, 07:44:27 PM
Yeah, I kick myself for finally starting to play out and get crowds into it with the blues...and then I started playing classical.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ghambit on July 05, 2013, 10:24:39 AM
Though I'm sure this is easily had in stores by now, I'll just leave this right here (for complete beginners and intermediate):
http://jaykauffman.com/game-of-thrones-arranged-for-classical-guitar-duet/

pw is "partofartofguitar"

Now go practice.   :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 05, 2013, 12:01:52 PM
The only thing that puts that into Intermediate is the tremolo, it's easy otherwise. I still haven't nailed the technique, need it for two of my favorites:

Asturias http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx7vOb7GNBg

and Recuerdos de la Alhambra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrtW99qTk6E

I had it up to about 75% speed at one point by building on Carcassi's Etude 7 Opus 60, which is supposed to be played slow, but pushing fast give that tremolo feel (and ruins the song, for practice only!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmOJbFV0INE


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 31, 2013, 09:44:34 AM
Has anyone bought or played with Riffstation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECvinPjmBVE&list=PLfuld-XeTFDYRe4Eue8QXQDlr4hDoCtLG)?  Looks like a great way to learn tracks and solos.  


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 31, 2013, 11:23:57 AM
That does look cool. I've been using a subscription to Ultimate Guitar (http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/) which has a huge selection of tabs for all sorts of music.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 31, 2013, 12:25:25 PM
Riffstation looks pretty awesome, but I might be more inclined to the tab site (if they're accurate). I was trying to learn Hanger 18's solo on Rocksmith and between their refusal to just have a straight tab mode and zomg Marty Freidman I just chucked it. I find it easier just to see it laid out on paper.

The slow and isolate features of Riffstation would work great in conjunction with the tabs, though. Some of those fast riffs are so much more interesting slowed down.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on January 13, 2014, 04:03:49 PM
It has been forever, but:

http://www.raphkoster.com/2014/01/12/the-sunday-song-the-ballad-of-chris-and-chris/

Direct mp3 link:

http://www.raphkoster.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/The-Ballad-of-Chris-and-Chris.mp3


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 04, 2014, 08:27:34 AM
So Ingmar solicited some questions about theory, and since I'm a guitarist primarily, I'll redirect this into this thread in hopes others find it useful.

So here's the basics. I've taken high school theory (94% final avg) and college level theory (dropped out to move to the Bay area). For some reason it doesn't really seem to 'stick' for me. I've tried working with a teacher, books, etc. I'm a fairly smart and talented person and it bugs me that I can't communicate with other musicians very well and it's holding me back from the next level of playing and being able to sit in with a more diverse set of musicians. And most of all, I'm extremely limited as an improvisationalist yet with the small amount I do know I'm quite adept with improvisation and I know theory can help me get to the level I want to achieve.

Second. I know a large part of my current dilemma is practice time, I'm super adhd with music and it's tough for me to focus on lessons (a teacher was better for focus, but also $$$). That said, I was very focused in high school and college, not only in class but applying the lessons directly in my own band's rehearsal, and yet I can't tell you what the 2nd is for a Bb scale or build the 9th chord for it. I'm lucky I can remember they are the same thing, even the whole 11th naming stuff (why can't they just call it a damned 4th chord) throws me. I have difficulty counting up and down scales, for intervals etc.

However, I'm pretty good with the fretboard and can play at least a passable fragment of a 9th chord if it comes up on a chart.

I mentioned in the Music thread that I found out an old family friend's daughter recently married a guy who is a serious player in the NYC music scene and has played with my favorite guitarist. So there is a possibility of maybe sitting in with him and some of his friends and I go back to being frustrated that my playing ability is so far advanced while my knowledge is so stunted.

Is there a question in there? I don't know. My action plan is to hit a couple of the theory books that seemed to mesh with my learning style and then hit up a local guy I know who used to give lessons and is a phenomenal jazz guitarist (I saw him at both gypsy jazz concerts in town over the last few years, so I think he'd be into it since I want to move in that direction).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 04, 2014, 09:17:04 AM
I studied theory in college and this is always where I started in my journey into theory.

(http://learnguitaronlinetoday.com/wp-content/images/circ5ths.gif)

1. know your major and minor scale shapes.

2. learn the pentatonic shapes for major and minor. 

3. learn 1 and 2 in several positions up and down the neck

Once you have that, then worry about dim, aug, etc.

Hope that helps.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 04, 2014, 09:36:19 AM
Yep, have pentatonic minor (but not pentatonic major!), major, melodic and harmonic minor shapes all memorized and I'm decent at improvisation with all of them. The pentatonics I'm pretty scary good, as well as the minors. The majors I only really began improvising with a couple years ago, using Allman Brothers tracks (Jessica in particular) as bases. I can play in any key in any position because I'm good with pattern recognition on the fretboard thanks to the CAGED method I promote here every now and again.

The dim and aug I always forget, though.

And chaining things together beyond just shapes is difficult. I can solo in a scale over a basic chord (maj/min/7th) but using different scales over chords or having anything beyond following the chords over changes is beyond me.

Having this dichotomy in skill and knowledge is maddening. I've even considered taking violin lessons or something to remove the advanced guitar stuff from the equation.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on February 04, 2014, 11:42:18 AM
As much as I struggled with the piano there's probably no better instrument for learning theory, so if you were going to try lessons that's the direction I'd go.

Also, this is pretty much the bible for music theory:

http://www.amazon.com/Harmony-Fifth-Walter-Piston/dp/0393954803


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on February 04, 2014, 04:26:50 PM
The previous conversation combined with my ex and her amazing ability to look at me like I was retarded for "not getting it" regarding various theory parts is exactly why I'm glad I didn't pursue music as a career.  I'll never be good at it, my mind just apparently doesn't think that way.  I miss playing the guitar, but overcoming that hurdle to take it to the next level and actually be "good" is an exercise in frustration.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 04, 2014, 10:04:58 PM
I agree on the piano -- it just makes it easier to visualize modes and scales.

Major: white keys starting at C.
Natural minor: white keys starting at A.
Dorian: from D
Mixolydian: From G
Pentatonic: black keys only

And so on. It's not until you get to exotic stuff like Hungarian scales or something that you start breaking the obvious patterns.

The trick to memorizing them is counting keys between notes. I know it's an extra thing to memorize, but there's 8 keys to a perfect fifth. Six to a perfect fourth. A major third is 5, a minor third is 4. A major 2nd is 3, a minor second is two. You count the root note in all these, obvously.

Flip a fourth upsidedown and it is a fifth.

7 is the tritone, the devil's interval. It falls between the two perfects. Stack them and you get diminished chords. There are actually only three diminished chords, because when you move, they'll cycle.

So to diminish a chord you find the perfect fifth and you flat it. You'll find that in jazz all over as a b5.

To augment it, you push the fifth up one piano key (minor sixth). that's 8 keys. One more key and it's a major sixth. 9 keys. One more and it's a minor seventh (the "bbq sauce" 7th). 10. One more and it's the maj7, the "lounge jazz" one. 11. And then you are at the octave -- that's 12 keys.

If you have that in your head, you can get to any chord pretty quick on the fretboard.

Putting scales over specific harmonies boils down to figuring out which scales work over which chords. There are SO many scales that this is really not something that is easy to master, but it basically boils down to "this scale starting at THIS root actually works over this DIFFERENT major or minor key", or it just works in the same key, depending on the scale. Sort of like crossplaying with a harmonica so that you can play blues with a major harp. I make no claims to being able to DO this mind you. :) But I understand the theory.

Progressions and modulations all boil down to leading tones or holding tones from one chord to the next. The vast majority of them involve taking a major third and moving it to a perfect fourth or fifth or (most commonly) the root note. This last one is what the V-I progression does.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 04, 2014, 10:31:17 PM
You know, given my fretboard knowledge it's probably better to stick with guitar. I do a lot of major and minor triads and can build them pretty much anywhere, so roots, octaves, fifths and thirds are pretty much down. My brain definitely thinks in guitar pretty well, I try to improvise progressions with triads in different positions and shapes as a somewhat regular exercise. So I think maybe building off that, but it looks like I need to break out a workbook and spend some real shitty rote time working on notation yet a goddamn gain.

That's the thing, I'm no novice, I have a pretty good idea what I need to do, but I'm not a rote learner at all and school settings completely failed me, and further books tend to leave me bored out of my mind. It's really upsetting because I /want/ to learn, I sit and start studying a book and I know it has stuff I need to know, and my mind just shuts off. I'm getting upset just thinking about it.

The second interval (after the 5th for a power chord) that any metalhead learned was a 7th for the devil's tritone aka Black Sabbath :) Another quirk is I think in minor keys, so to me a major third is a raised third, not vice versa so even if I learned on a piano I'd probably base everything on Am :) On the guitar everything I learned grew out of Em, for years I'd play a B Phrygian without really knowing what it was, because it was just the mode that fell under my fingers with Em notes starting from the B.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 04, 2014, 10:46:02 PM
Well, you can count frets just as easily as keys, it's just that the whole white/black thing helps visualize it a bit better. :)





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on February 05, 2014, 12:58:27 AM
It's been nigh 20 years since I looked at a copy of Piston but my recollection is that it has written exercises (here's 3 chords, add the next 3, or w/e), which adds an element of 'doing' to the whole process beyond just dry studying. If I can figure out which box all my old stuff is in I can check.

EDIT: I don't know a ton about guitar, do you have to worry about chord inversions at all?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 05, 2014, 07:14:52 AM
What do you mean 'worry about'? One of the tough weird things about guitar is there are multiple places to play the same note. Which is great for versatility in both voicing and timbre, as the different strings give you slightly different feels. Since I can more or less play anywhere on the neck, it's one reason I get a bit frustrated...learning the quirks of the fretboard is one of the steps to mastery. I still have a few blank spots I need to fill in, but for the most part I can just play along however which is really good for jamming with multiple guitarists or other instrumentation that sits in the same freq spectrum.

But I hardly think about inversions, I'm really just playing chord fragments for the most part, you can just stack them differently on guitar depending on position.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 05, 2014, 11:03:48 AM
Ingmar, virtually all guitar chord voicing feature inversions. Of the core open chord shapes:

C strummed open actually starts on the third (E), or you carefully don't play it (the "official" way, like the image), so that the next string gives you the root; or you start it on the 5.

(http://www.guitarlessons.com/images/chords/jpg/c-major.jpg)

So that's GCEGCE if you hit the low string, xCEGCE if you don't, and it might have the G in the bass (pretty common to do alternating 1-5 bass lines that way). Also sometimes ornamented with the G up top, as xCEGCG.

The A chord has similar: it is supposed to skip the low string so it can be played xAEAC#E, but if you hit the low string then you add the E bass.

The G chord goes GBDGBG, though there's an alternate form that is GBDGDG.

E starts on the root, but goes EBEG#BE and is always played that way. The standard guitar tuning is to E.

The D chord has the least range because unlike the others, you can't get at the 1 or 5 on the lowest string. So it is customarily played xxDADF#, alternating bass can be done with xADADF#, and fingerpickers or people with big enough hands to wrap around might actually play it as F#ADADF#, usually as part of a bass line into a chord change.

All of these can be barred and moved up and down the neck, which of course preserves the intervals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Ingmar on February 05, 2014, 11:10:33 AM
OK cool, I was just wondering if all the material on voicing would be wasted or not.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 05, 2014, 11:50:03 AM
No, not at all.

Because of the fingerings, given a particular chord shape, some inversions are easy to play and some aren't. It's why hearing sus2 is common with C shapes and D shapes and A shapes, but is a pain with G or E shapes. Sus4 is trivial with D and A shapes, and only easily done in the bass range for G and C.

This is part of why alternate tunings have always been a big part of plucked stirng instruments... opens up new sorts of intervals.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 05, 2014, 12:41:04 PM
Ooh, I found a cool new toy. I've been coming across this D shape a lot more in the earlier pieces I've been playing. Oddly enough, I learned it initially from the Allman Brothers. It's a nice way to hit the D shape off the A shape. I guess it's a D/F#?

(http://i.imgur.com/J4sJjsw.jpg)

http://chordgenerator.net/D.png?p=xx4232&f=--3121&s=4

Yeah, look at that there! The URL is the input. Awesome!

Though I tend to be super lazy and just play the x0222x A chord and hammer on this (I forgot to leave the open A x0423x):

(http://i.imgur.com/tIIUZgZ.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 05, 2014, 05:47:58 PM
Psst, the D shape is actually the C shape with a partial barre. :) That's the fingering that makes it obvious.

That fingering of it is common for descending bass lines in folk music.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 06, 2014, 07:05:49 AM
Heh, I didn't even notice! The C/D interface is one I've been trying to work on. All the interfaces between the shapes, really. It's probably my favorite 'theory' thing to noodle with (fretboard theory). Most of my work on that particular shape interface has been in Em (of course!) which is weird because of the minor third.

Hmm. Maybe I should try to notate out the exercises I do trying to link things together on the fretboard as a first step to integrating the music and fretboard theory. Like I'll try to run triads up and down but it's all just shape memory though some of the intervals I'm aware of when I'm playing (the aforementioned root/third/fifth).

Yes, that's it...I think I've got a plan, by George! Something that lets me noodle but can be used to further my notation and if not theory learning, then theory awareness. I can mine that vein and see how things look on the other side.

Thanks for bouncing ideas around!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 06, 2014, 09:51:52 AM
The G shape is also the same as the A shape. A is the "barre" part. That's why you can play it xx2225 or xx2255... it's partial for 542225, whih is just the G up two frets.

The other neat thing you start to twig to is this:

022100  start here, but then move across strings, towards the higher strings. Watch the numbers slide sideways:
002220  and notice that the 1 becomes a 2 on that pesky B string bc it's tuned off from the others. Do it again,
200232  and notice that it wraps right back around to the other side when "pushed off the edge."
320033  here the other 2 becomes a 3... or a 0.
332010  and here the 0 becomes a 1 as it hits the B string
133211  and now we have slid everything up by 1 fret, thanks to that B string raising things

You just navigated down by 4ths through the circle of fifths. If the B string were a C, it would be incredibly obvious. Of course, then the high E would need to change too, to preserve the intervals...





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 06, 2014, 10:00:37 AM
The G shape is also the same as the A shape. A is the "barre" part. That's why you can play it xx2225 or xx2255... it's partial for 542225, whih is just the G up two frets.
Yeah, it's not the chords but linking the scales between the shapes that's tough :) All the shapes dovetail into each other, CAGED repeat. The outer 5s in your example set up the E shape. Most scale forms I only know in E or A shapes.

That other thing you posted is just weirf  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 06, 2014, 01:59:03 PM
It's because the guitar is tuned (mostly) in fourths.

One thing it shows is that there's a movable low string chord form that just isn't used very much:

221xxx

You can slide that up and down the neck just like you slide xxx232.

People tend to use the power chord form instead, but it can actually be handy to play full major/minor chords on the low three.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 06, 2014, 10:21:16 PM
Yep I use that, though sporadically as my A-string rut is duads or maybe arpeggiated triads root on the A string and 3rd and 5th on the D string. That triad figure I learned really young and became a cornerstone thing early on, it's great on the bass. The duads I began to use in place of r-5th power chords (which I generally played as 5th-root-5th-octave anyway, BIG).

When I complain about my lack of theory (and it is stunted), I get a laugh out of how much more I know now than I did when I was all checked out on drugs, booze and women. I did a lot with very little, but it was a struggle to make any progress in writing.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 10, 2014, 11:34:33 AM
For the bass players.  :heart:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVPCC6V3xRs


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 10, 2014, 01:15:41 PM
For the bass players.  :heart:

I was expecting THIS. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nvAkWB1ESI)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 03, 2014, 12:58:39 PM
Hey, I've been playing a bit more lately! Andy Aledort (one of my favorites) just put out a new column that hits right on something I've been studying the last couple weeks, playing with rhythmic voicings up the neck. Really good stuff in here and this should propel my little adventures into this theory quite nicely.

http://www.guitarworld.com/deep-andy-aledort-how-create-inventive-rhythm-parts-connecting-mode-based-chord-voicings-video

And some work in progress while trying to get up to snuff for the CD sessions again:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3667682/Music/Etude7_Op60.mp3
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3667682/Music/Estudio.mp3

And working some more on one of my favorite songs, Bistro Fada. Really need to get the B section down! I have a similar problem with Capricho Arabe, but that one is more about the B section being a barred notation, I might just have to rewrite it to physically play it! Anyway, Bistro's A section, with original recorded variations intact more or less:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3667682/Music/bistro_fada_wip1.mp3


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 06, 2014, 08:52:13 PM
So, been messing about with jazz chords more, and now I am craving a nylon-string hybrid guitar.

I have now tried all these, all with solid tops.

Guild GN-5
Yamaha NTX700
Cordoba Orchestra w/ cutaway (solid cedar top)
Cordoba Fusion 12 Maple
Cordoba GK Studio
Kremona Verea

Next step up would be solid backs and sides too, but nobody seems to carry those in store.

Guild -- kinda dry.

Yamaha -- Great blend across the strings, but  it wasa bit plasticky and tinny played acoustic, sounded good plugged in. Alas, they don't have the higher models to try in store.

Orchestra with cedar -- my favorite, I think. Warm tone, kinda dark.

Maple -- leans to the treble, wasn't as balanced, IMHO.

GK Studio -- thinner again, thin body, meant for flamenco, seemed like. There was also a GK Studio "negra" -- that one was pretty nice too, but action was a bit high for my tastes. Nicer tone than the spruce ones.

Kremona -- a real surprise. Very nice tone. Less playable than the Orchestra, though, it was bigger and felt like a chunkier neck (not width, but thickness). Just felt more like a tank. This bigger body also made it super boomy and feedback prone when plugged in.

Now I need to drop way way more Xmas hints to my wife. :)

For those here who play nylon (Sky!) what do you play? I had the higher end Yamaha's recommended -- NTX1200's -- but nobody has them in stores. :( The 700 just didn't impress me.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 07, 2014, 05:05:10 PM
I once played a Taylor cutaway nylon that was amazing....and I've never found a good once since. So far the cheap Lucida Artista LG-755 I paid $300 for used (with case, friend price) is unbeatable. I always pop into a music store while traveling and I've yet to find a better one. The bass strings give a nice loud, warm bass and the nylons just sing with a purity I can't get enough of.

I don't like pickups and mic mine. I didn't like the mic'd sound until I got the ribbon mic (MXL R144). Still tweaking the ribbon mic placement to reduce boom (around the sound hole), because it's a loud, warm guitar so the ribbon mic being warm enhances that a bit too much. I pair it with the SM57 pointed at the 12th for the trebley bits.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 14, 2014, 05:35:00 PM
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/keyhole/Old%20Teeth.mp3

Been too long since music was posted. Sorry for the fuckup right at the start, but it gets better from there.

DADGAD tuning, then partial capo 3-4-5 at the 4th fret.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 30, 2015, 09:38:24 PM
The worst part about letting my chops get rusty is the pauses in my improvisation. Playing some bass, I'm just a beat or three behind where I know I can be, struggling to keep up rather than planning out a couple bars ahead. Then I went and sat behind the drums (because I had left the snares engaged and it was making me crazy) and kick out a badass funk. Blah.

I've pretty much lost focus across all instruments currently, kinda sucks. Going to have to put some time into something to at least feel good about playing. Of course I'm currently getting a bunch of offers to jam with folks now. Thanks, fate.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on March 13, 2015, 07:39:49 PM
Nylon crossover obtained. I ended up spending quite a little pile of pennies on a Cervantes Crossover I, with solid Palo Escrito back and sides and a solid cedar top. Here's a little bit of noodling on it that does it no justice whatsoever. Action is slightly higher than I am used to, so I keep fumbling. I promise I will play more cleanly as I learn the neck on this a bit better. No dots, aaaah! Well, one side dot on the 7th fret, thank god. No pickup in it, dunno if I will add one. It has sustain for days.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/CervantesTest.mp3

In this hunt I looked at Kenny Hill, Alhambra, Cordoba, Ramirez, and a lot of other makes. Basically been shopping for four months. My criteria started out just being a crossover neck (48mm nut), but grew to include a radiused fingerboard, and a cutaway. Once I realized that there weren't very many instruments out there that fit all the criteria, I widened the search to include stuff a bit more expensive than I originally planned. But as the sales guy said, it's a lot cheaper than a red sports car.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 13, 2015, 10:13:35 PM
Niiiice! Not having dots (side or face) is still throwing me a couple years playing primarily on the classical. I was chalk marking for a while, I should keep that up. Even the 7th fret would be enough to guide things (that's where I tend to lose my place when I jump up from open positions). I do like the full size classical neck, I could actually live with a bit wider neck actually. String spacing is still a bit tight for my fingers, which were trained on bass as far as single line picking goes.

Love the sound of nylon. Absolutely my favorite tone. Your recording sounds great!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on March 28, 2015, 01:22:33 AM
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/keyhole/Ration%20Books.mp3

Ironically, didn't use the nylon string at all on this one. Pretty much recorded it all today after writing it very very quickly (like, 20 mins tops) earlier this week.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 13, 2015, 11:01:53 PM
Forgot to update here when I fronted a three piece for four damn hours. I guess I should stop bitching about not having enough repertoire.

Anyway.

I just had a breakthrough on Hendrix style rhythm while screwing around with Hey Joe yesterday. I changed from cowboy chords to closed position and closing the C and sprinkling with some Allmans dust (pent maj ala Blue Sky) fills a giant hole in my ability to jam Hendrix. I'm pretty decent with open stuff and the E shape (low e root barre chord for you non-CAGED folks), but there was a gap in there with the C shape (the 5th string root barre chords, heathen).

Showing the old lady how I was throwing off the bass player trying to follow me because I wasn't playing roots, I used Hey Joe as an example. Just fragmenting the G by dropping the bottom root and fifth and then doing a cheap C inversion by barring the middle three strings popped a light. I plugged in some Allmans-style fills with less single-note and more fragments and bam! The missing link to move around freely like Hendrix.

Still a few years of screwing around to get the positions worked out and comfortable, but that was pretty huge for both my Hendrix jams and playing in general. The guys were loving it because apparently not many guitarists like to play Hendrix, and if they do it's all the nonsense part (playing with teeth, behind the head, tons of crappy effects and weird sounds).

At such a weird place with my playing as I don't practice any one style, so there's a lot of weirdness. Then I picked up the electric AND had to sing, stuff just started pouring out. Pretty cool to realize I'm probably better by a loooong shot than I ever was when I was doing it for real.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 14, 2015, 11:09:37 AM
Just found out the old lady got me a lesson with Stephane Wrembel for my xmas present :)

Only one of my very favorite guitarists. I've linked him before, but for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9YNKRwI5aU


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on November 15, 2015, 08:57:44 AM
I had that guitar workshop with the mighty Stephane Wrembel yesterday and after he taught us basic gypsy jazz rhythm he had me accompany him while he did examples! Woah! And then he had me do a few progressions of how to implement basic melodic motifs to begin developing solos and improvisation. I was floored! And he was doing the accompaniment! Craziness, I'd never thought that even at such a rudimentary level I'd have a proper lesson with the master. And during the show later that night he kept looking over at me with a 'see how this is based on what we talked about' look as he would play certain passages.

My thumb is blistered...

Had a laugh before the show when the other guys in the class came up and complimented me on my playing and were asking questions about what I did. Fiancee gave me the 'you can't say you suck' look, she's eating it up. Then one guy gives me his card, turns out he's a music teacher and wants me to show him some stuff. I was dying, I'm just a noodler :p

Best part about it is, while the lessons were rudimentary, it gave me the foundation to learn beginning through intermediate gypsy style (at least manouche style). Just the spirit of how to play and the basic approach, things that are hard to convey in a book (I have Stephane's and it's excellent). It was like discovering the CAGED system, an 'aha!' moment that I know I will spend years trying to integrate into my playing...

But that moment after we developed the basic rhythm strum (incremented it up at 60 second intervals by 10bpm from 60 to 120)...he turns to me and says, "ok you play the chords 3 and 4 and..." and boom now I'm on the spot! Then he did the same thing with motifs, "ok, play a basic motif over the chords 3 and 4 and..." First time I was shocked and just did something simple, for the second progression he said 'again, something different' and I got a little fancy and added a bit of ornamentation... "Stop. No. Keep it simple until you understand. Those notes were nice, but too soon. Learn first, then explore. 3 and 4 and..."

I'm still kind of in awe of the experience, both at having the lesson itself and being the star pupil that got to be the accompaniment! Craaazy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 27, 2016, 08:18:18 AM
Poking around on my multitrack looking for something and stumbled across this. I love when I discover some idea I randomly jotted down and then completely forgot.

https://db.tt/iq3uLBBV


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 21, 2016, 11:38:53 AM
Really want one of these effect pedals, turn your guitar into a mellotron!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiTHc8d9D20


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on March 21, 2016, 02:47:23 PM
Really want one of these effect pedals, turn your guitar into a mellotron!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiTHc8d9D20

That is beyond awesome.  Thanks for the link.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Tale on March 21, 2016, 03:38:16 PM
Ukeleles played like guitars. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2keZjbn4C6k) Rock on.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on March 21, 2016, 03:44:21 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puSkP3uym5k


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Tale on March 21, 2016, 03:48:54 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puSkP3uym5k

Wow to that, too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 21, 2016, 07:46:05 PM
Really want one of these effect pedals, turn your guitar into a mellotron!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiTHc8d9D20

That is beyond awesome.  Thanks for the link.
I know. Being on austerity right now HUUUURTS.

Goddammit, Electroharmonix STAHP IT  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZKVPzRyn50


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 28, 2016, 07:47:42 PM
So I tweaked my back last week. Not sure if it's my shitty chair at work or the fact that I was playing a lot of bass last week with the new Rush pack on Rocksmith.

Considering a new, lighter, bass. My guitar is light (Gibson SG), so thinking of maybe an SG bass or something, also going with a shorter scale. On the upside, better for my stubby fingers. On the downside, I already fret so hard it goes too sharp for Rocksmith a lot of the time.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 28, 2016, 09:13:18 PM
The newer Ibanez basses have a great tone, thin necks, and are quite light.  I'd suggest the SR series.  I normally play a Fender Jazz, but also have an Ibanez SR500 that I like for the tone control and fast neck. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 28, 2016, 10:05:54 PM
The neck on my custom ESP is pretty thin, but it's 35-1/2" scale. A few songs that should be easy are difficult due to the long frets at the 1-5 range. I'm hoping to find a 30" at a shop to try.

I'd really love a Ricky, but those aren't light, and that's my main excuse em reason for buying one...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 29, 2016, 05:15:53 AM
I'd really love a Ricky, but those aren't light, and that's my main excuse em reason for buying one...

Do they still have a double truss neck?  That was my big deterrent to getting one.  Seemed like a constant wrestling match with the neck.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 29, 2016, 08:45:51 AM
No idea, just basing it off my experience back in the early 90s with a loaner after my Peavey got stolen. Loved it.

Looks like they redesigned the SG bass in 2015 with a decent bridge, it also has a 30" scale... Got an email from AMS, and though I'm loath to buy a guitar online they have a pretty nifty feature where you can compare photos of the actual instruments they have in stock by serial number and buy the exact one. Weeds out some of the bum wood options, and they have one with nice tight grain throughout...

I blame the old lady. After she bought the new car she made some comments about me needing to get something shiny so I don't feel 'left out'...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 29, 2016, 12:51:07 PM
And I just read that Gibson may be discontinuing their bass lines? Sheesh.

Now I'm even more tempted to pull the trigger on the SG bass (with free shipping and free returns/no restock fee for 45 days...). And the old lady approves. Ye gods.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 29, 2016, 04:39:07 PM
And I just read that Gibson may be discontinuing their bass lines? Sheesh.

Now I'm even more tempted to pull the trigger on the SG bass (with free shipping and free returns/no restock fee for 45 days...). And the old lady approves. Ye gods.

Why not just buy an old Grabber or Ripper bass? They are marvelous chunks of wood and have a great vintage feel. 


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 29, 2016, 07:53:03 PM
Because I need a light bass and want a short scale.

I guy stayed with me while he was going through a divorce, had an early grabber that he bought in case with the tag still attached for $150 at a garage sale. I am the person who took the tag off, he 'always wanted to learn to play bass'. I told him if he ever sold it (because I knew he would, being bad with money and not a bassist) to give me first dibs, I would buy it for going rate, cash money, any time. He worked at a record store, so I'd see him every week on payday. Every week I asked about that bass, it became a regular thing. One week he goes, "oh yeah, I sold that thing, wasn't ever going to play it and needed the money"

What a dick.

Anyway, loved the grabber. Would love to have one, but I have a pretty specific list. If there were better stocked stores around here, I'd try a few things. Jag SS or something, maybe. But eh, I ordered the SG, we'll see how she plays. I do like mahogany and being able to see pics of the actual grain (and have generous return policies) makes me feel better than buying something sight unseen. Enough time to have my setup guy do his thing, too.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 29, 2016, 08:03:20 PM
I was going to mention that I have one of these lying around.

(http://www.dolphinmusic.co.uk/shop_image/product/24527-ibanez-agb200-transparent-brown--large.jpg)

Ibanez Artcore.  It's really a wonderful hollow body that's light and nice for sound variety.  

Big fan of Ibanez for cheap, but good value basses.

EDIT: I know you already have your choice in mind.  Just sharing at this point.  I'm actually looking for a 70's era Precision at the moment.  One of the great benefits of being 1 hour from Memphis.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 01, 2016, 09:53:50 AM
Just got in the bass today, Fedex guy was bummed I scheduled evening delivery (it's a signed-for delivery and I didn't want it loaded/unloaded an extra time for delivery tomorrow), called me and brought it over to the library. So it's been show-n-tell a lilbit here :)

Grain is as beautifully straight and tight as it looked online, I have to give props to AMS for that web feature. Plays great, sounds really good acoustically (as the guitar SG did). Has a buzzing (from vibration) pickup, which is apparently endemic to the model. I'll see if I can fix it with a little foam spacer hack, shouldn't be a big deal. And of course I need to plug it in and put it through it's paces. But on sheer playability, I love it, total keeper. Short scale works for me, though I'll have to test how sharp notes go once I get to my tuner. Doesn't seem bad to my ear.

Main thing that might possibly bug me is the trade-off for the shorter scale, it's a 20 fret and my Edwards is a full 24 frets and I'm just used to having that (since it's the only bass I've played in 24 years or so :)). It does have the top note from Southbound Pachyderm, so that's encouraging. I'll have to try Anesthesia... But at the end of the day, I can always pull out the Edwards for a song or two if needed. Having a lighter bass with a shorter scale is so worth it!

edit: bonus points for made in USA and hard shell case :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on September 20, 2016, 01:00:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/user/Musicianru/videos Some nice instruction from the legendary Pepe Romero on left and right hand techniques.

Still totally loving the SG bass, it plays so ridiculously well.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 05, 2016, 12:19:14 PM
I want one of these: acoustic guitar with built-in reverb and chorus (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Ho1pVfE4o). Woah!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 07, 2016, 07:48:23 AM
It's cool... but $1600 for a guitar with a battery powered pickup in it seems a bit much.  I'd just as soon buy a nice Martin D28.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 07, 2016, 07:54:13 AM
Well, it's a bit more than that, since it has an actuator that feeds the top to create the sound. The battery is more for the actuator and to a lesser degree the circuitry for the two effects.

It's a really amazing idea. I know it would be great for things like the renfaire circuit, where acoustic instruments are struggling for volume (my charangista buddy finally bought a pignose a few years back). Heck, it would be good for the redneck campfire across the street, they're rowdy as hell.

And that's just the volume boost ability of sending a wet signal with low effects through the top. The ability to have chorus and reverb without any other device is unprecedented.

I wouldn't have it as my first guitar, but I wouldn't mind having a classical version as my second!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on October 07, 2016, 08:55:46 AM
I agree that it's an amazing idea.  I think the best part of it is that it will encourage people to actually play their guitars more.  Just a bit pricey.  Current comments are that it's significantly heavier than a regular dreadnaught as well.



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 07, 2016, 09:00:20 AM
Yeah, that assembly is cast metal, so...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 26, 2016, 10:42:52 PM
Got one of these as a stocking stuffer this year.

https://www.amazon.com/NG-1-Classical-Flamenco-Acoustic-Guitar/dp/B00LTL0KLI

Going to try it out on the Cervantes. In theory, it would work on the charango, the bari uke, or the cuatro too. I'll see if I can post up recordings with and without.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 14, 2017, 07:45:53 PM
I'm guessing that many of you guitar guys already know about this, but I thought I'd share just in case.

Harmonic inconsistencies (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT4oOYj4SwQ)

I have been delving more into theory lately and the wave properties of string instruments interested me in a nerdy, physics sort of way.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on February 15, 2017, 08:08:02 AM
Nah, I'm a simple man :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on February 15, 2017, 10:46:09 AM
3rds are why so much amplified and especially distorted guitar music uses perfect 4ths and 5ths. :)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on February 15, 2017, 11:20:02 AM
Also ran across this tuning video with accompanying comparisons.  I appreciate what he's saying as a bass player... the heavier gauge strings do ring sharp when you attack them.

Taylor tuning (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvthw9XZrmw)

I also found this tuning to provide a much warmer sound.





Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on May 27, 2017, 05:28:27 PM
Nobody mentions Gregg Allman? :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 16, 2017, 09:20:02 AM
Not in here. Played a ton of ABB after it happened, though.

Now that I have a decent laptop for work, I plugged my interface into it and made a quick test recording last night.

http://cashwiley.com/test1-61617-12-15-am/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on August 24, 2017, 07:29:37 AM
Came across this video of Mark Knopfler discussing the evolution of his picking style and his use of different guitars. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG__SwkV3wg)  He seems like such a humble guy given the talent that he has.

Enjoy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on August 24, 2017, 11:32:57 PM
What a fantastic video, thanks for posting it. He's one of my favorites.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on October 26, 2017, 04:46:05 PM
recently bought an EVH lunchbox 15 watt tube amp to go with my Orange Tiny Terror.  Running it through a 2x12 with Celestions - Texas Heat and The Governor. I borrowed two guitars from my brother so now I have:

2x heads
1x  two by 12 cab
4x electric guitars
  • PRS CE 22 with Gibson humbuckers
  • Strat knockoff - single coil
  • Gilford with active pickups
  • Ibanez (forget model) with Zack Wylde EMG active pickups

I am in heaven.  This many options.  I will come up with a riff on the Ibanez and think "Hmm more of a strat riff" swap guitars and presto, or go "yeah this is more of an Orange vibe than the EVH".  Granted the Gilford and Ibanez are simply loaners, but man I am in heaven.  I realize I have been trying to make orange juice with apples for years.  Trying to get modern high gain metal tones through the strat and PRS through the orange pedals.  Simply plug the Ibanez into the EVH and off we go.   Tempted to buy a 1x12 with V30 Greenbacks in it to absolutely seal the deal on the metal tone.

I haven't felt this much desire to just play in ages.

/Squeeeee off


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 26, 2017, 05:51:29 PM
One of these:

https://www.larrivee.com/products/omv-03-recording-series

is sitting at a local thrift store for $800, and has been for two months.

But I need a new laptop (mine died). And various pricey house repairs. And...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 26, 2017, 08:10:16 PM
I think I've officially inherited the ampeg SVT head I needed for my 8x10 cab, along with a 15 cab. I was storing them in my garage for an old friend who's dad died. She got kinda bummed when I told her most of the stuff (including his handmade standup electric bass) was broken or junk, but this head and cab are decent. It's not the best SVT, but it's worlds better than my old Peavey POS.

Moves into the basement this winter after years of sitting in the garage, and it ain't coming out unless I start gigging. Excited to play the Gibson through it, the weak spot on my old ESP custom was the pickups, it never sounded punchy through the Peavey...

I think my classical guitar is in protest, decided to break a string on the stand. Granted, I only change strings when they break...(and then I replace the set). I don't even remember what I had on it.

I did buy a couple MXL condensers on a good AMS sale, so I should probably record stuff. You know, now that I don't have excuses for not plugging in the Scarlett 18i8. The last remaining snag in my recording ideas is how to track everything myself, since 90% of what I do is improvisational and writing and planning sucks all the enjoyment out of it for me. Also, I'd need to pick up a set of drum mics. And tune my drums. And get another cymbal.

I love drums and avoid that rabbit hole.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on October 26, 2017, 09:02:44 PM
the drum hole... yeah I have a half build Ludwig set I inherited from an uncle in my garage.  I really need to soundproof that place before I start smacking drums.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 27, 2017, 06:47:35 AM
Mine are in the basement, when I first looked at my house there was a kit in the living room. And that kid sucked bad. So I'm pretty much good with drumming as long as I don't go over into sound ordinance times...and even when I may have had an urge at midnight to play a bit, nobody has complained, ever.

My guitar was probably much louder, I used to play my amp cranked for natural tube distortion back in the day. It's amazing how loud a 12W amp with a 12" speaker can get.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 27, 2017, 11:23:36 AM
I'm trying to ignore gear mostly because I've not been playing so much since picking up art...but I was watching a thing with Isaiah Mitchell and holy shit is his fuzz pedal amazing. And just about impossible to get (a Tym Seaweed).

edit: he plays for Earthless and is a monster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sicDBhLQo4U


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 09, 2018, 10:52:07 AM
Like him or hate him, James is a master.  I thought you'd enjoy seeing how he does his job in a sort of unorthodox way.

Enjoy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8-5czYJvPM).

The camera placement is amazing.  


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 09, 2018, 01:51:42 PM
Who could hate James Taylor? We saw him a couple years back. I'm not too into folk music but he transcends the genre into just a wonderful warm listening experience.

Very cool, he's great at what he does.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 09, 2018, 01:55:58 PM
I've been focusing on art the last couple years and I feel when I come back around to guitar I'm going to hit Stephane's stuff really hard. It's just sooo good, and he is willing to sit and talk like this video, I've talked with him about this stuff and it bums me out I don't study harder to be worth getting such great instruction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH-82YLTjaM


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Nebu on January 22, 2018, 09:16:18 AM
For all of you that were forced to learn piano when you wanted to play guitar, I bring you THIS. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJW9N-h8UgI)

Creative people... love em.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on January 22, 2018, 01:19:19 PM
I wish I had been forced to learn piano!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on December 19, 2018, 07:17:44 PM
Almost no posts all YEAR? This cannot stand.

I went to a closing music store today because they were selling things for 50-70% off. Picked up guitar cables and the like on the cheap. All the instruments left were Chinese makers I'd never heard of. There was one all solid very nice looking Merida acoustic -- list $1800 for half that. Passed it up -- slightly too boomy for me. But they had a whole mess of concert ukuleles, and one lonely tenor. We're talking all solid wood $600 ukes. I grabbed the tenor -- solid spruce top, solid bookmatched sapele with a lovely sapwood figuring on both the back and sides, onboard electronics. Sounds pretty sweet. They had the soprano one right next to it -- looked like probably the same tree. Sound was almost identical. But of course, the tenor was sweeter and more playable.

They also had an all cherry wood soprano, but frankly I didn't like the sound of it as much.

If anyone else wants to take a flyer on mail order, or happens to be in the vicinity of Carlsbad CA, it's this place: https://audio-depot.com/ Also on Reverb here: https://reverb.com/shop/audio-depot


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 20, 2018, 07:25:09 AM
Taking up art has really put a crimp in my musical pursuits!

I still plonk away now and again, but it's mostly just noodling to keep the chops from disappearing entirely. I have started playing bass more regularly (via Rocksmith), because the 2015 SG Bass I picked up a while back is just such a joy to play. For guitar, still mostly playing my spanish nylon stringer. I've been toying with the idea of getting an EHX C9 (or B9 or Mel9, but iirc the C9 suits me best), but I just don't play enough to justify it right now (and art is expensive).

I also bought a cheesy little USB cassette deck to transfer a couple old band rehearsal tapes I found, but the build quality is so abysmal, that project stalled. I hate to spend the money to have them transferred, since they're just rehearsals and pretty bad (even the best audio quality one is when we were breaking in a new drummer). Don't want to spend much on a deck, either, because I'll only use it to transfer a handful of tapes and I hate reselling stuff. Blah.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on April 01, 2020, 11:56:55 PM
Threw this together this evening. Just me and my nylon-string, though I actually wrote it on electric. Standard tuning.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/PlagueYear.mp3

In a plague year, here we are inside
Just you and me together, letting minutes slide
Outside you’d never know it, sun is shining bright
Spring is sprung and flowers do not hide
Open all the windows, but don’t go out the door
You’re here with me,
And I don’t need nothin’
Don’t need nothin’
Don’t need nothin’ more

In this plague year you’ve got to stay in line
Sleep all day, worry all night, and sip our hoarded wine
We are each other’s safety, I’m yours and you are mine
We’re counting on each other’s hands and on borrowed time
Dontcha know that loan has always come due
We can tally up the years
But I don’t need more than
I don’t need more than
Don’t need more than you

(instrumental break)

In this plague year, crows are cawing loud
Such a cliché for them to parade around
Some may call it bad luck, having to hide
But where else do you keep love but on the inside
Let’s hold each other close, do what we do best
You’re here with me
And I don’t need nothin’
I don’t need nothin’
I don’t need nothin’ else!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MournelitheCalix on June 20, 2020, 09:44:22 PM
Threw this together this evening. Just me and my nylon-string, though I actually wrote it on electric. Standard tuning.

http://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/PlagueYear.mp3

In a plague year, here we are inside
Just you and me together, letting minutes slide
Outside you’d never know it, sun is shining bright
Spring is sprung and flowers do not hide
Open all the windows, but don’t go out the door
You’re here with me,
And I don’t need nothin’
Don’t need nothin’
Don’t need nothin’ more

In this plague year you’ve got to stay in line
Sleep all day, worry all night, and sip our hoarded wine
We are each other’s safety, I’m yours and you are mine
We’re counting on each other’s hands and on borrowed time
Dontcha know that loan has always come due
We can tally up the years
But I don’t need more than
I don’t need more than
Don’t need more than you

(instrumental break)

In this plague year, crows are cawing loud
Such a cliché for them to parade around
Some may call it bad luck, having to hide
But where else do you keep love but on the inside
Let’s hold each other close, do what we do best
You’re here with me
And I don’t need nothin’
I don’t need nothin’
I don’t need nothin’ else!

Right before COVID-19 became a thing here in the US I was able to purchase a 1980 Alvarez Yairi CY-117 in near mint condition from an old couple who wanted it gone and whose son decided he didn't want it.   Been learning to play Beethoven and Bach on it while social distancing.   The strings are nylon I believe (got it restrung at a local luthier here, cleaned up and polished) .  Its been an amazing find.  Really eye opening to hear translations of Bourree and Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring translated for guitar tableture.   I have played since I was a boy in grade school but limited my exposure to rock and metal.  I never had the desire to try classical music and I am impressed not only with how hard it actually is but how much skill it takes to play these instruments.   La Vie en Rose took me a lot longer then I care to admit as the movement was relentless.  In order to properly learn the timings, I had to invest in a metronome and even today I practice 30 minutes each day just doing progressions to the beat of that machine.   One thing this plague has given me is time, time to learn new things.  I haven't tried composing, hopefully I am not too far from that.  One thing is for certain, I wish I had some formal training on musical theory.  My compliments on your tune.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 21, 2020, 09:40:19 AM
Dude, I was practicing classical and got pretty good but when I went to record an album I got really burned out trying to get takes that were clean enough. In metal and blues, my feel playing (which was considered 'sloppy' was a huge asset in a sea of mechanical precise metal players and lackluster old white blues dudes. But for classical, though the feel tends to give me a good interpretation of many pieces (my Capricho Arabe is still on of my favorite versions), having to be so precise was a serious challenge.

Here's the A section of Capricho Arabe (https://dl.dropbox.com/s/etr6nuu6i4ntf2l/Capricho_A.mp) I recorded back in 2012. I can still hear the two mistakes that caused me to reject it, and a couple more I could live with but still make me cringe a bit. The B section modulates up and was much more difficult to play, never even got it that good. Though sitting here in 2020 I wish I had just stuck with it and released it with flaws, just to have a record (ahaha) of what I was playing at the time.

I'm still playing a lot more bass on Rocksmith.I've gotten so many more CDLC tunes over the last couple years, I've been getting into a lot of new and old stuff. My nostalgia playlist is getting pretty epic with old school rock and metal, from Distant Early Warning to Harvester of Sorrow to A Mansion in the Darkness to Angel of Death. For newer stuff, I've been digging into Mars Volta, Goliath and Cicatriz ESP are my favorite jams rn.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: MournelitheCalix on June 21, 2020, 02:37:21 PM
Here's the A section of Capricho Arabe (https://dl.dropbox.com/s/etr6nuu6i4ntf2l/Capricho_A.mp) I recorded back in 2012.

Absolutely beautiful.   Classical guitars are an absolutely amazing class of instruments.  You should have definitely published it, I couldn't tell where it was though admitting I have never heard the piece your playing before.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 21, 2020, 04:38:28 PM
Mine is a spanish guitar I got from a colleague when she moved to Seattle. She knew I loved playing it (she kept it in her office and I'd play it every time there was a meeting in her building) and she wanted it to have a good home. It's my favorite guitar by a long shot, the tone is rich and has a ton of overtones. I paid 250 for it and like it better than some guitars I've played that were in the 2k-3k range. Though I still weep about that nylon Taylor cutaway I let get away years ago (800 for a 2k guitar, ouch), it was pretty comparable (and had more access to higher frets).

I like the wider classical necks because it's more comfortable despite having short fingers. Since I play bass, I'm used to longer frets and wider spacing, as well as playing with my fingers (I play both guitar and bass almost exclusively with fingers unless the song calls for a pick). It's not too uncommon to find crossover between bass players and classical/flamenco/roma/etc. Robert Trujillo from Metallica plays some flamenco: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXcxRF1_4HA


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on June 29, 2020, 09:21:43 PM
Raph,

Thanks for posting this.  On a surreal Monday night as I contemplate a host of uncomfortable topics this is a great soundtrack to have in the background.  Thanks for sharing.

As for guitars - as the shutdown hit I ordered a cheap Ibanez and Seymour Duncan Black Winter pickups (can you guess what style of music they are intended for  :why_so_serious: ) and have been making the local squirrel population nervous with my shrieks, wails, and chugs.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on June 30, 2020, 12:58:05 PM
I have been remiss. There are now a HOST of "Songs for a Plague Year."

"At the Mercy" - about the politico-medical mess.
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/At%20the%20Mercy.mp3 (studio)

"Plague Year" - about quarantining with your sweetie
http://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/PlagueYear.mp3 (version above)
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/Plague%20Year.mp3 (newer studio version)

"Sign it Love" - about NOT quarantining with your sweetie, aka "save the post office!"
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/Sign%20It%20Love.mp3

"Another Hero's Gone" - RIP John Prine
https://www.facebook.com/raphkoster/videos/10158349673186528/ (live)
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/Another%20Hero's%20Gone.mp3 (studio)

"Optimistic Beast" - about quarantining with pets
https://www.facebook.com/raphkoster/videos/10158357098371528/ (live video)
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/Optimistic%20Beast.mp3 (studio)

"Essential" - about essential workers
https://www.facebook.com/raphkoster/posts/10158383094186528 (live video)

"My Back Yard" - about having the back yard as a refuge
https://www.facebook.com/raphkoster/posts/10158388431191528 (live video)
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/My%20Back%20Yard.mp3 (studio)

"George Floyd" - about Black lives mattering
https://www.raphkoster.com/music/plagueyear/George%20Floyd.mp3 (studio)

"Karen" - brand new!
https://www.facebook.com/raphkoster/posts/10158654722276528 (live video)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2020, 09:37:49 AM
Has anyone played a Harley Benton guitar? I just heard about them, and as much as I hate the thought of buying a cheapo chinese guitar, I'm seriously tempted by a few of these.

Namely this one, a black Ricky. I've always wanted one but can't justify the cost of an actual Ricky... but at this price... https://www.thomannmusic.com/harley_benton_rb_414bk_classic_series.htm

If I still have a job by the end of the year, I've been thinking about rounding out my stock of guitars with the basic set: LP, Strat, Tele, etc, and basses Jazz, Grabber, P, etc...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on July 24, 2020, 02:43:49 PM
I can't speak to the guitars, but a friend of mine got a Harley Benton 4x12" cabinet and it was absolutely killer (for right about $400).  It had 4 Celestion Vintage 30's, and the amazing thing is that about the cheapest one can get just a V30 speaker alone is right around $125, which means you could buy the cabinet, throw it away, and save about $100.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on July 26, 2020, 09:11:52 PM
I can't speak to the guitars, but a friend of mine got a Harley Benton 4x12" cabinet and it was absolutely killer (for right about $400).  It had 4 Celestion Vintage 30's, and the amazing thing is that about the cheapest one can get just a V30 speaker alone is right around $125, which means you could buy the cabinet, throw it away, and save about $100.

sounds very loud and very metal!   


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 27, 2020, 11:35:47 AM
Talked myself out of it, as I'm happy with my Gibson SG bass and don't really need more basses.

Then my strap slipped off for the first time in decades and I've got a cm divot on the back of the neck behind the first fret and it's already chipping. Dammit. I love that fucking bass, man.

Now I'm thinking about it again...


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on July 27, 2020, 09:20:32 PM
and don't really need more basses.
Ummm...what? That sentence doesn't even make any sense.  Edit your post and we'll forgive you.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 28, 2020, 06:13:30 AM
Eh, I'm not a hoarder. I'd sell at least one of my guitars if it wasn't such a pain in the ass. As long as I've got a good electric, bass, and classical, I'm good. I do want to hold on to my old gigging bass I got when I was living in LA, just for sentimental reasons (I can't go back to long scale!). But when you have the perfect instrument, why would you need another one?

Part of it is I just don't have room in my small house. I only had a small storage room, and that is now my (way too small) studio. And as we're in the middle of housing bubble 2.0 (prices have literally doubled in the last year in my poverty-prone area), this is likely the house I'll die in (no interest in a mortgage in retirement, assuming my career survives the coming depression and strife).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Selby on July 28, 2020, 06:28:31 AM
But when you have the perfect instrument, why would you need another one?
I concur! I have one electric I bought when I was 16 that I love to play that cost me $60. It has a tone and feel I've never been able to duplicate holding some MUCH more expensive and fancier guitars, so why bother? My ex gave me an Ibanez for Christmas one year and it is a fine guitar to play, but it just doesn't do it for me so all I use it for is alternate tunings.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Raph on October 06, 2020, 12:57:12 PM
Eddie van Halen just died of cancer. :(


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 06, 2020, 01:10:46 PM
Just posted that over in the celeb death thread. His music was so much a part of my youth, EVERYONE wanted to play guitar like EVH.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9r-NxuYszg


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on October 06, 2020, 01:16:03 PM
Yeah. I taught myself hammer ons/pull offs from trying to learn the main part of Eruption.

Edit: and tapping, duh


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on October 22, 2020, 05:06:08 PM
Finally caved and begun to use guitar plugins. Using Neural DSP and wow what a game changer. Using Archtype Nolly, Nameless, and Corey Wong.

They have a free 2 week trial for all their plugins.

https://neuraldsp.com/


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on October 23, 2020, 06:31:45 AM
Finally caved and begun to use guitar plugins. Using Neural DSP and wow what a game changer. Using Archtype Nolly, Nameless, and Corey Wong.

They have a free 2 week trial for all their plugins.

https://neuraldsp.com/
Cool, I look forward to hearing more about your experiments. I personally dislike technology in my setup, though to be fair I don't have a setup conducive to using tech for music right now.

I did mess around with the ASIO mod for Rocksmith, which allows me to connect my DAC to use as both DAC and monitor, which is cool. Except my flat response recording headphones lose the thump of playing through my sound system, so.... It does reduce latency and sound better, just not rockin' enough für mich.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 11, 2021, 07:00:18 AM
I don't know how I managed to play bass for almost 4 decades and not get exposed to flat-wound strings.

I'm normally not too fussed about strings, I leave them on until they break or begin corroding. My SG bass still had its factory strings on it! I'm not really a 'gear guy', keep it simple and have fun has always been my motto. Since I've been playing a lot of bass the last couple years, I decided to put some new strings on her and for some reason I thought to look up a couple guys who I enjoy tonally, Steve Harris and Geddy Lee. Turns out both use Rotosounds, one uses flat-wound, the other round-wound. Since I've never played flat-wound, I loaded those on first.

As soon as I took them out of the package, I was pretty excited that I had found something revelatory...but I've played tape-wound (the black nylon wraps) on bass and they were kinda meh.

Flats are SO GOOD. I don't really care too much about the brassy tone, I play hard and it tends to be something I have to manage to keep from pissing off the guy on the mixer. The flats reward this with a nice full sound but none of the harsh high freqs and artifacts of round-wounds. And I was able to play a fairly normal session (an hour) without burning the heck out of my fingers. I slide a lot, and flats are a joy to slide. Both hands quite happy with the change!

Main downside is the set of RS77S flats I got are 40 50 75 90, which are really thin. I like CABLES on there (I play 11s on guitar, 13s when I'm in full form, I like the stiffness but also like to grab 2-step bends). The Harris signature set is a 50 75 95 110, which sounds about right...but they're long scale (my SG bass is short scale). The search goes on...

It's funny, because I think back to when I was in music school and was just tearing it up, technically. That was on a very long scale bass (I have stubby fingerlings) with roundwounds. If I had a short scale with flats, I would've been SO MUCH BETTER. Crazy.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 13, 2021, 09:05:24 AM
I bought myself a bass guitar and a keyboard recently, to try to get back to doing some songwriting as well as learning bass and piano-ish. The bass guitar was an Ibanez beginner type (no idea if it's short scale or not) and it came in last night, so I loaded up Rocksmith and went to town. Turns out all those years of playing guitar, mostly as a rhythm type guitarist, means I was able to pick up the bass pretty easily. I'm not rocking Geddy Lee level stuff there, but punk/alt and metal bass playing seems to be much easier than I expected it to be.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on March 16, 2021, 11:27:49 PM
I bought myself a bass guitar and a keyboard recently, to try to get back to doing some songwriting as well as learning bass and piano-ish. The bass guitar was an Ibanez beginner type (no idea if it's short scale or not) and it came in last night, so I loaded up Rocksmith and went to town. Turns out all those years of playing guitar, mostly as a rhythm type guitarist, means I was able to pick up the bass pretty easily. I'm not rocking Geddy Lee level stuff there, but punk/alt and metal bass playing seems to be much easier than I expected it to be.

good deal man.   I am contemplating buying a bass as well


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 22, 2021, 09:10:02 PM
Haemmy, Little Wing is an amazing song to learn to move through a chord progression up and down the neck, it flows beautifully and loops nicely. I got a massive boost in fretboard understanding by letting the progression change position based on linking that I learned with CAGED method. Starting to link with bass notes and melodies and stuff (copping a lot from what SRV would do to it, ofc).

Then I started to apply that to solos, using the chord tones and leading melody stuff I was doing with the rhythm.

Bonus is that it's the fiancee's favorite, so my noodling practice gets rave reviews...but once you learn the progression, take it offline and use it to stretch out to the far ends of your fretboard understanding and you'll probably get some more freedom to move around comfortably.

If you're into that. Sorry for the uninvited advice, I just really got a ton out of applying CAGED to it and can't help but pass it on. I still benefit from noodling it and wish I had known that stuff back in the day! Just saw that DLC pop up on steam and felt compelled  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 24, 2021, 08:05:34 PM
I actually bought Little Wing Rocksmith DLC the other day when it was on sale, just because I figured it'd be a fun one to play.  :why_so_serious:

I'm finding that simpler bass lines (picked) are pretty easy for me to pick up. Fingering it is a whole other thing that I'm going to struggle with, simply because my days of playing "Spanish style" classical guitar arpeggios for metal are almost 30 years in my rearview mirror. Not used to using all the fingers of both hands independently.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2021, 06:34:53 AM
I'm probably not much help, I'm still working on my right hand technique after 37 years or so.

I might be over the initial glow of the flatwounds though  :why_so_serious: I think I actually enjoy the way the roundwounds bite into my fingers, it's weird. Not sure if it's just getting used to the different feel after the aforementioned decades. I haven't managed a more in-depth session to mess with them, I want to get in the zone at some point before I make a serious judgement on them.

I'm also kind of bummed I can't dial in a good tone in the game. Partly my home theater setup is not great for music, esp bass (just a 10" sub that's boomy af). Spent some time yesterday trying to track down my old gigging bass head, because I used to get great tone with just 4 knobs (3 eq/1 vol). But I'm pretty sure a lot of my tone also came from running that amp hot through 2x 400W 15" EVMB full range.

Guitar it's relatively easy to emulate some good tones. For bass, it seems almost impossible! I wasn't happy with my sound before, but trying to compensate for the flatwounds has been pretty frustrating.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 06, 2021, 06:47:20 AM
Managed to find the head that helped give me my sound back in the gigging days. Many heads were scratched when other bassist were trying to figure out my tone and I showed them this. I just went direct into this head and out into a 2x15 loaded with EVMB full range speakers. It's true what so many guitarists say in interviews about it being in the fingers!

https://reverb.com/item/29981533-listing-update-kustom-kasino-concert-guitar-bass-amplifier-head-black-and-blue

Now I just wish I could find one in good shape. I'm not a gear head, but I'm still salty that got stolen (along with the speakers. by my guitarist.). I've forgiven and moved on, but I've yet to find an amp I'm happy with!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 15, 2021, 07:55:44 AM
Speaking of filling out my gear with stuff I liked back in teh day....I guess I won't be getting a new/old distortion pedal any time soon. My band was addicted to Proco Rat pedals, and one from the vintage that we used runs $400-800  :uhrr:

These were just cheap distortion pedals back in the day, almost nobody around here used them but they're weren't rare or anything, afaik. Best tone in the world, bass or guitar. There are clones and someone is making the Rats again, but it's weird how much people will drop for some of the plain old gear. It's not like my old Casino/Proco setup was sought after, lol!

At least the Casino was a pretty rare amp, I've never actually seen another one in the model I had, until that reverb listing. Rats were pretty common on the west coast by the early 90s, maybe they were all the post-88 run (ours were bought in 85 iirc).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 16, 2021, 08:00:04 AM
The reason is probably the same as why the Roland 808 goes for thousands now. They likely made them with binned transistors to get the distortion/sound they wanted and since the semiconductor industry has A) gotten a lot better at getting high yields of good chips and B) no longer making the transistors in question anyway, there is no supply of the piece that gives them the distinctive tone people want.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 16, 2021, 08:39:35 AM
Yeah, I know. We didn't know how good we had it. I also had an 808. Sad trombone.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on June 23, 2021, 10:51:24 AM
I just picked up one of these on my local Craigslist for $400 (with the footswitch!) listed as 'broken, for parts'.  They typically sell for $1k to 1.5k used on Reverb.  It's from the mid-90's.

When I got home it powered up fine, but no sound, however it looked brand new, even with new tubes.  I opened it up, and after a few tests, I realized with was a broken LDR that controls the master volume.  One $15 part and 10 minutes to solder it in, and it runs perfectly.  It may be replacing my Sansamp RBI for bass duties when running on the Green rhythm channel.

(https://mesa-boogie.imgix.net/media/Amplifiers/Electric/Tube%20Pre-Amplifier/TriAxis/triaxis_programmable_preamp_fd1_front_panel.jpg)


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on June 23, 2021, 11:16:56 AM
Nice find! I have a couple old pieces of gear I inherited from a friend's dad, one is a little bass kicker amp that I need to open up, because it's barely working and a fire hazard. Super gross, dog hair and smell...no wonder it got left behind after the estate sale lol. I did get a decent 4x10 out of the deal, not that I really need that at all. Should sell that and the cheap ampeg head that came on it and buy something like that Sansamp (I've been eyeing a DI from them for a while now, for my rocksmith setup).

edited to add: after 3 months with the heavier flatwounds, I'm never going back to rounds. I may opt for the mediumer gauge set. Which might make more sense if I had mentioned the set I've settled on is the 'medium' set of short scale flats from La Bella (but is the heaviest of the 3 sets they make in that style). I could probably lighten up the E and A a bit, they're honkin massive, but the D and G are just about right, so similar to guitar I may have to try to find single strings to make my sets (doubtful with such a small company, I may have to call them as they're in NY). String Gauges: .049, .069, .089, .109 https://www.labella.com/strings/category/short-scale-4-string-deep-talkin-bass-flat-wounds-bass/

Srslytho I can play longer, harder, and not have my fingers so beat up I need to take days off. In fact, I'm usually taking rest days because I play so hard I'm risking my knuckles!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 03, 2021, 11:34:58 AM
I've been on the fence for a couple years about getting a Digitech Whammy DT, not so much to actually use it as such, but someone wrote a mod for Rocksmith that can use the auto-tuning feature via midi to auto tune for every song. A429? No problem, Malcolm. D Standard, easy. Only caveat is the need to drop the E to D for drop tunings, but even for that I've been thinking about a hipshot (they stopped making the model I need though).

But the $400 price tag before tax/ship, just to avoid tuning in RS? Yeah, nah. But I check Reverb now and again, and look for deals...it's backordered all over the place right now, too...today one popped up Like New on the amazon warehouse (damaged box) for $300, and I've been sitting on my amazon credit for a couple months (in anticipation of maybe buying a Darkglass Alpha Omega DI), so $200 later it's on a truck to my house!

It's kind of a silly thing, but after so many years of filtering by E Standard I got out of the habit of even bothering to retune for other songs and just stick to the E Standard end of the library. This opens up at least a thousand more songs, so it's definitely going to be worth it in the long run...as long as latency doesn't mess around (but reports are it's not too bad, relatively speaking).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on August 26, 2021, 12:48:05 PM
Every now and again, even old musicians can have 'holy shit' moments.

Victor Wooten simplifies keys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3vYVGMgZYY

edited to clarify: by old musicians I mean me, not Victor  :grin:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Velorath on December 14, 2021, 08:22:01 PM
Kickstarter modular pedal (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/modaleffects/introducing-disruption?ref=discovery_staff_picks_newest). Don't know nearly enough about guitars to whether this thing has potential or if it's total garbage, but figured Sky if nobody else might at least want to glance at it.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: HaemishM on December 15, 2021, 07:26:22 PM
Oh, it's guitar gear snobs trying to get the same versatility that amp/pedal sims give you digitally without using a computer/DAW setup.

K.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on December 16, 2021, 05:51:47 AM
Honestly, that's the one selling feature for me  :why_so_serious: The more I can get my other passions away from a computer, the better. If I didn't like pc gaming so much, I'd be happily living in a cave in the deep woods (with solar for my amps ofc, I'm a man in a cave, not a caveman!).

You would be hard-pressed to find someone less into gear than me. I never found any effects outside a very simple gain pedal (a proco rat ~85) that I kept for more than a couple days. I just like a fairly pure signal. My guitar rig was guitar - rat - laney stack; my bass rig was bass - kasino + 2x15. Simple, and the sound comes from the fingers.

That said, I've had a yearning for a Darkglass bass pedal for a while. If I /was/ a more gear-oriented person, I'd get a nice small amp and run a darkglass and maybe some compression/eq....so I could use it in conjunction with Rocksmith through my dusty old Scarlett interface. I've tried headphones, but as a bassist, that shit doesn't cut it. Need to /feel/ it.

Also, I may be forced to move back to guitar because I may be getting osteoarthritis in my right hand knuckles :( Or they're breaking constantly, I play pretty hard. And I'm hoping it doesn't lock up my left hand at some point. Thankfully I can still draw and paint without pain, but getting old sucks!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on March 01, 2022, 02:38:22 AM

That said, I've had a yearning for a Darkglass bass pedal for a while. If I /was/ a more gear-oriented person, I'd get a nice small amp and run a darkglass and maybe some compression/eq....so I could use it in conjunction with Rocksmith through my dusty old Scarlett interface. I've tried headphones, but as a bassist, that shit doesn't cut it. Need to /feel/ it.


come to the darkside, I own this and love it:   https://neuraldsp.com/plugins/darkglass-ultra



Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 01, 2022, 07:29:23 AM
come to the darkside, I own this and love it:   https://neuraldsp.com/plugins/darkglass-ultra


No more computers! I have my eye on the newer Photon pedal, though. They keep improving the darn thing!

https://www.darkglass.com/creations/alpha-omega-photon/

I dig the integrated compression in the new one, it's a pretty amazing looking stomper!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on March 03, 2022, 01:06:02 AM
$519  for the new shiny hardcopy, or $50ish on sale for the digital version of the old one.....   I mean if I could have my cake and eat it I would have both.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 03, 2022, 06:50:51 AM
$519  for the new shiny hardcopy, or $50ish on sale for the digital version of the old one.....   I mean if I could have my cake and eat it I would have both.
Paying a ~$400 premium (ignoring what you did there with retail vs sale pricing) to not use a computer to play bass is acceptable to me. I'd likely recoup most of that money if I needed to, because DG hardware sells like hotcakes on the secondary market.

None of that matters since no place near me stocks DG stuff (or really any decent bass DI stuff), and I'd really like to a/b a slew of pedals before picking one, as I do hate reselling gear. Also, the photon puts in a decent (not great) compression circuit into the mix, one reason it's attractive to me - one less piece of gear to deal with. In fact, you're getting a lot for that extra dough, it's a standalone interface, as well.

Part of it is updating the sound, sure, but part of it is getting an ASIO setup for Rocksmith (to reduce latency and improve tone) WITHOUT involving any more computer bullshit. But if I can't get a decent setup for that, I'd still need something like it in an ABY setup to route the bass to an amp and get some tone on it. Problem with chasing my tone is that NOBODY is modeling an old Kasino Concert amp head through a Peavey 2x15 with 2 full range 400W EV speakers played at 11.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on March 09, 2022, 11:38:11 AM
I was recently commissioned to design a custom tube guitar amp.  The basic requirements:

1) 50W output
2) Two channels - first channel is based on basic Fender Twin, second channel is Dumble overdrive based
3) Effects loop that can accept either a) pedals as preamps, b) external preamps

I'll post some sound clips when it's completely in it's cabinet.

(https://www.musicalsparks.com/images/kh/kh1.jpg)
(https://www.musicalsparks.com/images/kh/kh2.jpg)
(https://www.musicalsparks.com/images/kh/kh3.jpg)
(https://www.musicalsparks.com/images/kh/kh4.jpg)

EDIT: relocated image hosting.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on March 09, 2022, 11:42:05 AM
Nice!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 09, 2022, 01:16:32 PM
Will it have knobs that go to 11?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Fraeg on March 10, 2022, 11:36:22 PM
broken images for me and would really like to see what you are building.  and yes... knobs that go to 11... or... a hidden knob in the back that goes to 11 that doesn't do anything cept maybe turn on some LEDs  gotta get that RGB in the guitar cab  :drill:


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 11, 2022, 06:37:17 AM
Broken images for me as well. I like the idea for the circuits though!


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on March 11, 2022, 07:22:53 AM
Does that work?


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on March 11, 2022, 12:23:17 PM
Does that work?
Hnnngh ooo yeah that works for me.

I love tubes and point-to-point wiring. Hell, I should probably give up on that Kasino amp I talk about and just look for a schematic and build one.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 01, 2022, 11:30:01 AM
So now I'm thinking I might have a reason to get the Darkglass  :grin:

I've been running through a few Rocksmith setups to find something better than the stock 'realtone cable into pc output to home theater' I've been using all along.

ASIO is a cool option and I have an old Scarlett interface that works well with it. But I've been struggling to get the output to my receiver and I hate headphones (no thump, way too much treble directly on my damaged ears). No way I've found yet to split and route the signal from the pc (game/backing track to receiver, bass to amp). I think my only option for using ASIO would be a little PA setup, and I don't have any need for that in general. Most people using ASIO seem to be using headphones. The main benefit to me would be getting the in-game tone programming...which I don't really use anyway, just use my own custom tone for everything.

I decided to simplify my thought process. To test proof of concept, used a crap Y splitter to split the input between the realtone cable to the pc and a stock cable to amp (a crap Kasino 8" I got for free and is not good, I put an old Fulltone OD in front of it just so I could get through the testing). Turned down in-game bass audio to 0. Good enough to prove the concept works.

So now comes the expensive parts, because I'm probably going to want an amp. I have an old Crate 12" kicker-style combo that's really messed up (I got for free from the same estate), so I don't think my meager electrical skills are up to fix that. So maybe a little Rumble or something, I dunno. Basically I want the richer lows of a big speaker (I prefer 15s) without so much volume it summons the cops at midnight. Then the DG to tone it and something like a Saturnworks ABY to split it better.

Works pretty good. I think with a better amp and the DG for compression/dirt I've solved the upgrade path. Also a cleaner splitter, I'm looking at the


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on April 10, 2022, 12:54:55 PM
aaaawwww yissssssss DG test 1 complete.

The interface/layout works ok, a bit weird but whatever. I tweaked the 3 presets to a clean, dirt, and od setup (they were kinda close already). Spent a few minutes dialing them in while jamming in Rocksmith, then just enjoyed having a simple 3-button solution that also had a nice tweakability without messing with the presets. Cool. Actually perfect for how I've been playing (using 3 presets in Rocksmith, but no tweakability oh and garbage tones). I'll need to spend more time of course, but so far I'm impressed.

Works perfectly in Rocksmith, as well. It has 2 balanced 1/4" outs, so there's my splitter (realtone to pc, line to amp). RS reads the notes about as well as it ever does with bass. Also, the Whammy DT sounds fantastic, I just put Sleep Dragonaut in my favorites list because it was sofa king crisp and dirty with my test dirt pre. Before it was muddy af (and not the good way). And best of all, it's really quiet on the line and makes the busted old amp sound good enough to convince me I don't need a new amp. Though I may dust off my fender 12" for the verb and vibrato (we'll see how that goes over in the living room heh).


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on May 23, 2022, 07:26:10 AM
If you like gypsy jazz, Stephane Wrembel has released a ton of playalong backing tracks on youtube (notation on his site for each): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0SnbbdCiY_H3o2I4-LQWMo9VBTFzpYBc


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on July 28, 2022, 10:50:49 AM
I hit the proverbial jackpot while perusing some musical equipment at an estate sale.

A local widow held an auction for a bunch of her late husbands musical equipment: most had been picked over when I got around to seeing what was left, and I came across this gem:

(https://musicalsparks.com/images/mesa/PXL_20210914_172535258.jpg)

It is a Mesa Boogie Mark 2C from the mid 1980's.  It's non-functional (which is why it was passed up) however when I looked on the inside, it held the coveted Simulclass transformer set.  I took a chance and purchased it.

It was completely butchered on the inside, but all the pieces are there to rebuild a Mark 2C+, which is probably the most famous quintessential metal amp, which launched the thrash metal band tone like Metallica and Slayer.  These routinely sell for over $8K on Reverb.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Sky on July 28, 2022, 11:43:03 AM
Nice! I wish I had kept up with my electrical tinkering (stepdad was an electrician, I once built a PA that was used by Porter Wagoner....using Radio Shack parts heh). I'd love to tune-up a little Kustom amp I've been using for bass in Rocksmith. And I have a little hartke kicker that I think I could fix with just a deep clean, maybe new pots (it's....gross with smokey dust and dog hair).

The Kustom is ok, and I love the brand because that was my bass amp back in the day (as I've mentioned a few times, iirc). Sounds great with the Darkglass in front of it with a little compression, but it's bassy (which I don't mind but I do tend to play after midnight and live in a city). So I am looking at one of these to iso it a bit: https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/SubDudeII--auralex-subdude-ii-subwoofer-isolation-pad


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Trippy on July 28, 2022, 01:07:01 PM
Rick Beato just uploaded a studio tour if you want to indulge in some gear and studio envy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EedvUGZRUXQ


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Miguel on July 28, 2022, 01:22:49 PM
Nice! I wish I had kept up with my electrical tinkering (stepdad was an electrician, I once built a PA that was used by Porter Wagoner....using Radio Shack parts heh).
It's shocking to me how much stuff people get rid of for pennies on the dollar because they don't seem to want to find someone who can fix it.  Now of course I have an advantage, in that I repair this stuff for people as a side gig, and I know how a good portion of it works internally, but I've scored so much good gear and have been able to resale for much higher (at least the stuff I can't part with).

The week prior I picked up a '68 Fender Deluxe Reverb for $250, when the dude didn't wan't to spend $450 to repair it.  It had a blown power transformer, a bad output tube, and one of the volume controls didn't work.  So $100 for the new transformer, $60 for a tube set, and $5 for a volume pot (and of course the normal cleaning and maintenance), and three hours of my time, and I resold it for $1500 not two weeks later.


Title: Re: Guitar thread
Post by: Samwise on June 04, 2023, 01:24:58 PM
It’s been a long while since I played regularly, but I was sorting through boxes of papers yesterday and came across this tune (https://www.dropbox.com/s/5h9rvigocn3u2lh/Secret%20Waltz%20and%20Curve%20of%20Her%20Brow.pdf?dl=0) that my dad transcribed and arranged for me almost twenty years ago, originally written by one of his old bandmates around the time I was born.  Odds are good it’s the only written copy in existence.  Been plinking away at it all morning and it’s very gratifying to feel the old muscle memory kicking in.