f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Sports / Fantasy Sports => Topic started by: ghost on October 16, 2013, 12:35:07 PM



Title: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on October 16, 2013, 12:35:07 PM
The season is getting cranked up soon. 

Imma start this off by saying that Dwight Howard is a complete prima dona asshat (http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/9834281/dwight-howard-houston-rockets-upset-tobias-harris-orlando-magic-wears-no-12-jersey). 


Would any of you losers be interested in an NBA fantasy league?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on October 18, 2013, 12:14:58 PM
Not a lot of fantasy interest for me on this one.

Warriors should be fun again this year. Bogut already hurt himself, of course.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on October 18, 2013, 12:16:51 PM
I'll be watching, but my home team is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo shitty, I don't think the Hawks will actually win 25 games.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 18, 2013, 12:23:03 PM
As soon as an EF-5 knocks down the arena in OKC, I will try to care again. You owe me one, Mother Nature.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on October 18, 2013, 12:42:25 PM
Just be happy you still have a football team.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on October 18, 2013, 02:07:26 PM
I guess the deal with Sacramento relocating to Seattle died?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Hoax on October 18, 2013, 11:22:41 PM
Bogut already hurt himself, of course.

Oh ffs.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 04, 2013, 06:39:57 AM
Philly, Orlando and Phoenix don't seem to get the whole tanking thing.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 14, 2013, 12:59:16 PM
This season is freaking insane.  Good teams are playing bad, bad teams are playing great, LAL got better by subtracting two hall of famers, BKN got worse by adding two, the first pick is shooting something like 5% from the field while the 11th is making philly think about Iverson with Dr.Js body.  All in all it has been incredibly fun so far, i would love a Pacers Spurs final even if the league would hate it.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 14, 2013, 01:03:28 PM
The Cleveland draft pick guy has to be the most  :uhrr: thing I've seen in ... forever. That city puts fail in the water.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 14, 2013, 07:10:38 PM
That was one of the worst drafts in the history of the NBA, though.  You have to remember that.  There was maybe one or two quality guys in the entire first round. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 14, 2013, 07:52:11 PM
That was one of the worst drafts in the history of the NBA, though.  You have to remember that.  There was maybe one or two quality guys in the entire first round. 

Yep it was. And this one will be star-studded.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 14, 2013, 08:20:31 PM
Jabari Parker, Julius Randle and Andrew Wiggins will all be superstars in the league.  Those guys are all spectacular. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on November 14, 2013, 11:35:59 PM
Get Dante Exum on your radar too.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on November 14, 2013, 11:37:40 PM
Aaron Gordon isn't too bad either.  Too bad we're just renting him.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 15, 2013, 06:36:52 AM
I'm also impressed by Keith Appling and Gary Harris are both really good players.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 15, 2013, 07:13:03 AM
Yeah, there is a lot of talent in the NCAA right now.  This draft could go down as one of the best ever. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 15, 2013, 11:36:51 AM
That was one of the worst drafts in the history of the NBA, though.  You have to remember that.  There was maybe one or two quality guys in the entire first round. 

A lot of the other rookies are performing above expectations though.  Oladipo and Michael Carter-Williams are going to be all stars eventually but plenty of others are contributing, nobody at all had Bennet going very high and he would still be a bust as a 10th pick.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 15, 2013, 11:46:39 AM
I think probably half of these guys will be out of the league by the end of their rookie contracts.  It will be interesting to see what Nerlens Noel does when he gets healthy though.  He has the potential to be a Dikembe Mutombo type defender. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 25, 2013, 07:23:18 AM
(http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/823646782.gif)


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 07:28:11 AM
Matt Bonner is hilarious.  He reminds me of a 1 year old Golden Retriever that just can't handle it and runs around the house like an idiot jumping on all the furniture. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on November 25, 2013, 08:45:18 AM
In other NBA news, Derrick Rose done for the season.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 09:02:54 AM
That guy just can't catch a break. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 25, 2013, 10:50:33 AM
Kobe just signed a two year 48.5 mil extension.  Makes sense for Kobe, makes sense for the owners, fuck the fans who expect a good team though.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 12:01:11 PM
Why does it make sense for the owners?  He did just have a fucking nasty injury and he's old. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 25, 2013, 12:36:34 PM
They could be wheeling him out there at 75 years old and he would still be worth over 20 mil a year, for the same reason actors are worth tens of millions even if they can't actually act worth a shit.  Kobe is a world wide super star, he makes the franchise a whole lot more than they are paying him even if it doesn't translate to wins on the court.  Jordan right now would be worth about the same.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 01:23:06 PM
I think you underestimate how much Laker fans care about winning.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 25, 2013, 02:09:56 PM
I'm sure they care plenty, but Kobe has millions of fans around the world who don't even know when the Lakers play.  "Lakers" just happens to be the color of his uniform.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 25, 2013, 02:15:04 PM
Yeah a large contingent of NBA fans follow the player, not the team. They honestly don't give a crap if they win or lose if their guy isn't playing.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 03:02:57 PM
Is that why the NBA attendance values generally go from worst to first (http://espn.go.com/nba/attendance)?  I understand that Koby is a big draw, but he won't be in five years and, by then, he will have tanked the team. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 25, 2013, 03:05:12 PM
Well it's a two year contract, and attendance has nothing to do with his worldwide appeal.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 03:08:03 PM
His worldwide appeal mostly affects him, not necessarily the Lakers, although they will reap some of the benefits from things sold with his name on them. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 25, 2013, 03:10:40 PM
There are two cities where winning is basically irrelevant to attendance in professional sports. Boston and Chicago.

For everyone else it matters, but in combination with other factors like star players, the community, the weather, and pricing.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 03:18:47 PM
I think that there are two issues here:  1.  Money and 2.  Winning.  The assumption in the initial statement makes it sound as if money was all that the ownership was interested in, and the Buss family has clearly shown, over the years, that money takes a back seat to their goal, which is winning championships.  I'm still not sold that this was a great money move for the Lakers as they will sell jerseys with someones name on them regardless, particularly since if they dropped Koby they would be able to pick up a Kevin Durant or even LeBron next year (which would be a solid move for them).  Now their hands are really tied to a lame duck (literally) player.  

There is no argument that works to make this a positive, on the court, basketball move.  


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 25, 2013, 03:41:27 PM
You forget. Jerry is dead. He's no longer making decisions about winning anymore.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on November 25, 2013, 04:11:32 PM
There are two cities where winning is basically irrelevant to attendance in professional sports. Boston and Chicago.

For everyone else it matters, but in combination with other factors like star players, the community, the weather, and pricing.

Oakland for basketball is right up there. The Warriors didn't win shit for 20 years before last year and were still drawing big crowds. Not sure why the A's and Raiders don't get that pass, maybe the facility.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 25, 2013, 04:12:28 PM
Well I was referring to the totality, but yeah everyone forgets Oakland on general principle, winning or not.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 25, 2013, 08:45:57 PM
Maybe some people still pissed off about them moving to LA?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 26, 2013, 02:45:33 PM
Mitch Kupchak is smoking crack (http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/story/_/id/10041523/mitch-kupchak-says-los-angeles-lakers-compete-titles-kobe-bryant-final-seasons).  The Lakers are done contending for titles as long as Koby hangs around. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 26, 2013, 02:47:45 PM
They do have enough for a max deal next season.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 26, 2013, 02:50:30 PM
It has nothing to do with the money.  As long as Koby is there he will demand all the attention and to be the center of the team.  I dislike Dwight Howard, but you can see how well that deal worked out.  They (LA) could have conceivably lured Lebron next year when he's a free agent, but he's not going to play with Koby.  I just don't see it happening.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 26, 2013, 02:52:38 PM
This isn't Carmelo Anthony we are talking about.  Kobe is a proven winner and you can build a contending team around him.  It depends on how good he is when he comes back though.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 26, 2013, 03:02:59 PM
He's 35 coming off of a ruptured Achilles.  He's also been playing for 17 years already, which has taken its toll on his body.  I'm not a big fan of keeping him around. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 26, 2013, 03:04:48 PM
Kevin Love, FA in 2015, would be a great get for the Lakers.  I don't think they get Lebron, but they could conceivably pair him with Koby.  I think he would play better with a strong personality than Howard did. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 26, 2013, 03:05:21 PM
Well it certainly depends on how good he is coming back from that torn acl, but last year he practically dragged that team into the playoffs singlehandedly before going down.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 26, 2013, 03:06:40 PM
He's obviously an LA kid, so I'm sure he would love to play at home.  I love his game, too. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 26, 2013, 03:08:51 PM
Yeah, he's from Santa Monica and played for UCLA.  His dad also taught him basketball by showing him showtime Lakers games.  I would be shocked if he didn't end up a Laker.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on November 26, 2013, 03:35:12 PM
Kobe's points have fallen off a lot since he turned 30. He's had some good years and a really terrible year with injury. In 4 years, he's never seen 2200 points a season when in his late 20s he was putting up 2300 easy when healthy.

I mean we're talking about 100-200 points lost every year. That's easily the difference in 10 games won or lost in the NBA.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 28, 2013, 02:11:44 PM
Two teams in the Eastern Conference have a winning record... :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 28, 2013, 03:40:07 PM
Brooklyn has to get their shit together eventually, a team with that much talent can't be that horrible.  Everyone else is on a race to the bottom though.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Fordel on November 28, 2013, 04:24:19 PM
How are the Raptors going to do this year? Irrelevant as usual or any hope?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on November 28, 2013, 08:30:22 PM
I don't think the Nets are going to pull their shit together.  Garnett and Pierce are fucking ancient and D Will isn't really all that good.  Lopez is decent, but he's not the guy you want to center your team around.  And I've never been a Joe Johnson fan.  I don't expect them to do much of anything this year.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on November 28, 2013, 09:39:43 PM
They do have enough for a max deal next season.

'Bron is starting to dump a lot of money into the local Miami economy (bought a stake in a soccer team and has some other local ventures going), just got married (his wife opened a retail store here also), has his hands likely in a lot of HUGE city re-development plans, is really settling in now, etc.  I do not foresee him opting out at the end of this year... especially with the way Beasley is re-developing and the Heat bench can beat most NBA teams by themselves.  Btw, Oden's also dropped like 60lbs now I hear and is coming along nicely.

So if that idea gets into the heads of Laker fans (or anyone), I think they can forget it.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on November 29, 2013, 07:20:28 AM
Yeah, anyone who thinks Lebron is leaving a dynasty team is deluded.  It's mostly cav fans who think this though.  My guess is the Lakers are shooting for Love or Melo.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on December 02, 2013, 06:08:13 AM
Haha.  Austin Rivers was on the court for 4 minutes in the Pelicans game versus the Knicks (http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400489127).  During that time the Knicks were +10....  That guy is so awful. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on December 04, 2013, 02:55:00 PM
Those unprotected picks Atlanta got from BK on the joe johnson trade are looking so good right now.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on December 04, 2013, 03:40:52 PM
Atlanta fans hated him and Josh Smith. They were the worst high dollar players on the team.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on December 05, 2013, 07:09:22 AM
Joe Johnson is one of the most overrated players to ever be in the NBA.  Josh Smith is one of the best players in the league when he gets his head out of his ass.  But he'll never live up to his potential. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on December 05, 2013, 07:10:58 AM
The Bucks have the shittiest roster in the league right now.  Jesus they are bad.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on December 25, 2013, 04:35:36 PM
Fucking hell, Miami is good. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on January 03, 2014, 08:36:12 PM
Fucking hell, Miami is good. 

Nah.  :grin:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on January 04, 2014, 02:11:08 AM
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10233011/carmelo-anthony-blake-griffin-proposal-mulled

Quote
With the looming possibility of Carmelo Anthony departing New York as a free agent this summer, New York Knicks officials have discussed proposing a trade to the Los Angeles Clippers for Blake Griffin, according to league sources.

Sources say Clippers management has also had internal discussions about such a deal but that the clubs have not yet spoken to one another about a potential trade.


Can anyone tell me why the clippers would want to entertain this in the slightest?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on January 04, 2014, 09:52:45 AM
Because Melo is a lot better.  Not that i would do it.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on January 04, 2014, 11:14:42 AM
Melo is the exact opposite of moneyball.  Bad idea.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on January 20, 2014, 08:20:41 AM
(http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/834243701.gif)


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on February 08, 2014, 01:34:01 PM
(http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/photos/large/837730494.gif)

Check out the score + timer.  What an incredible finish.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on February 08, 2014, 03:15:50 PM
Dark home uniforms are confusing.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 03, 2014, 01:45:32 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/5YovKN3.jpg)


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Fordel on April 03, 2014, 03:08:17 PM
That's fantastic.


The Raptors made the playoffs? Is this a hoax!


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on April 20, 2014, 03:43:25 PM
Getting rid of Rudy Gay and Bargnani did that team so much good.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 20, 2014, 05:10:45 PM
So yeah, Hawks won a game. Um, how is Indy this bad?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: ghost on April 20, 2014, 08:09:54 PM
So yeah, Hawks won a game. Um, how is Indy this bad?

I think they were playing above their talent level for much of the season.   And I think there is probably a locker room issue.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 21, 2014, 09:28:35 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/5YovKN3.jpg)

whytheNBAsucks.gif


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 21, 2014, 10:23:24 AM
Now we begin the long ridiculous journey of the first round that takes a month. Why? The Hawks played on Saturday, they don't play again until Tuesday. We need a 3 day layoff when they don't even leave town? And yet, when they do change cities, they play on 2 days rest. The fuck? How does that make any sense at all. It should be reversed.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on April 22, 2014, 12:17:37 AM
Now we begin the long ridiculous journey of the first round that takes a month. Why? The Hawks played on Saturday, they don't play again until Tuesday. We need a 3 day layoff when they don't even leave town? And yet, when they do change cities, they play on 2 days rest. The fuck? How does that make any sense at all. It should be reversed.


I imagine its all decided with TV ratings in mind.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 26, 2014, 01:29:30 PM
Clippers are a dead team walking.  All that work to become championship calibre?  Yah, flush it down the toilet.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on April 26, 2014, 02:24:55 PM
Clippers are a dead team walking.  All that work to become championship calibre?  Yah, flush it down the toilet.

I listened to that whole recording.   :ye_gods:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Hoax on April 26, 2014, 03:19:44 PM
Quote
VS: I wish I could change the skin. The color of my skin
DS: That isn't the issue. You've missed the issue.
VS: What's the issue?
DS: The issue is we don't have to broadcast everything.
VS: I'm not broadcasting anything. I don't do anything wrong.

DS: Why are you taking pictures with minorities... why?
The conversation centered around a now-deleted photo that Stiviano put on Instagram of herself and Magic Johnson (pictured)
The conversation centered around a now-deleted photo that Stiviano put on Instagram of herself and Magic Johnson (pictured)
VS: What's wrong with minorities? What's wrong with black people?
DS: Nothing, nothing, nothing.
VS: What's wrong with Hispanics?
DS: It's like talking to an enemy. There's nothing wrong with minorities, they're fabulous. Fabulous. Because you're an enemy to me.
VS: Why?
DS: Because you don't understand.
VS: I don't understand what?
DS: Nothing, nothing.
VS: That racism still is a lie?
DS: No but there's a culture.
VS: What culture?
DS: People feel certain things. Hispanics feel certain things towards blacks. Blacks feel certain things towards other groups. It's been that way historically and it will always be that way.
VS: But it's not that way in my heart and in my mind.
DS: But maybe you want to adjust to the world.

DS: Yea it bothers me a lot that you want to broadcast that you're associated with black people. Do you have to?
VS: You associate with black people.
DS: I'm not you and you're not me. You're supposed to be a delicate white or a delicate Latina girl.
VS: I'm a mixed girl.
DS: Ok well.
VS: And you're in love with me. And I'm black and Mexican. Whether you like it or not. Whether the world accepts it or not. And you're asking me to remove.... you want me to have hate towards black people?
DS: I don't want you to have hate. That's what people do- they turn things around. I want you to love them- privately. In your whole life, everyday you can be with them. Every single day of your life.
VS: But not in public?
DS: But why publicize it on the Instagram and why bring it to my games?
Recorded: A call between Sterling and his girlfriend was released and he is heard making racist assertions
Recorded: A call between Sterling and his girlfriend was released and he is heard making racist assertions

VS: I can't believe that a man who's educated, a man who's a scholar, a man...
DS: Well believe it, and stop talking about it. Let's finish our discussion with a period, ok?

VS: I took a picture with someone I admire (Magic Johnson).
DS: Good
VS: He happens to be black, and I'm sorry.
DS: I think the fact that you admire him- I've known him well, and he should be admired. And I'm just saying that it's too bad you can't just admire him privately, and during your entire f****** life, your whole life- admire him, bring him here, feed him, f*** him, I don't care. You can do anything. But don't put him on an Instagram for the world to have to see so they have to call me. And don't bring him to my games, OK?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on April 26, 2014, 04:05:27 PM
Am i a horrible person for thinking it makes it super extra racist that he is complaining about Magic Johnson and not some random black dude?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 26, 2014, 04:13:53 PM
That's not even the entire convo.  Thing was painful to listen to; gave me flashbacks to a few convos I wish I recorded myself actually.  Honestly, as much as I hate sugarbabies I kinda commend his particular half-breed trophygirl for having the balls to record it.

Let's see how much tapdancing occurs in the media come Monday.  Honestly, I really hope people just talk openly rather then just shuffling shit under-the-rug (like StephenA tends to do).  Tired of it at this point.

Am i a horrible person for thinking it makes it super extra racist that he is complaining about Magic Johnson and not some random black dude?

Nope, not at all.  But, you have to realize the point of privilege Sterling comes from.  To him MJ is a flea on the social/financial spectrum.  His celebrity means little.  Relatively speaking, MJ to him is exactly some "random black dude."


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 26, 2014, 06:44:10 PM
ESPN isn't in bed with the NBA, so they're already running it as front page on the website. I don't think they'll stuff any of this under the rug.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 26, 2014, 07:59:54 PM
Quote
“We have heard the tape on TMZ. We do not know if it is legitimate or it has been altered. We do know that the woman on the tape -- who we believe released it to TMZ -- is the defendant in a lawsuit brought by the Sterling family alleging that she embezzled more than $1.8 million, who told Mr. Sterling that she would 'get even.' Mr. Sterling is emphatic that what is reflected on that recording is not consistent with, nor does it reflect his views, beliefs or feelings. It is the antithesis of who he is, what he believes and how he has lived his life. He feels terrible that such sentiments are being attributed to him and apologizes to anyone who might have been hurt by them.

 :awesome_for_real:  Woman scorned and all that.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 26, 2014, 10:53:47 PM
I guess Sterling was tired of Dan Snyder getting all the 'worst owner in sports' buzz lately. What a cretin.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on April 27, 2014, 03:45:12 AM
Quote
“We have heard the tape on TMZ. We do not know if it is legitimate or it has been altered. We do know that the woman on the tape -- who we believe released it to TMZ -- is the defendant in a lawsuit brought by the Sterling family alleging that she embezzled more than $1.8 million, who told Mr. Sterling that she would 'get even.' Mr. Sterling is emphatic that what is reflected on that recording is not consistent with, nor does it reflect his views, beliefs or feelings. It is the antithesis of who he is, what he believes and how he has lived his life. He feels terrible that such sentiments are being attributed to him and apologizes to anyone who might have been hurt by them.

 :awesome_for_real:  Woman scorned and all that.

Oh please, how can they have heard the tape and not know whether it was altered? he either said those things or he didn't, and if he hadn't he'd know for sure.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2014, 08:33:23 AM
This is pretty consistent with some of the other crap he's said over the years. It's not shocking given his history, nor do I think it was doctored. I think people across the USA are just finding out what kind of scumbag he really is.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on April 27, 2014, 11:22:09 AM
This is the first I've heard of this but... HOLY SHIT.  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2014, 02:48:22 PM
Clippers are unshockingly getting annihilated.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 27, 2014, 05:29:17 PM
Just as I suspected, there's more.  I was going to "go there" but turns out Sterling will just do it for me:
The extended clip. (http://deadspin.com/exclusive-the-extended-donald-sterling-tape-1568291249)

 :popcorn:

Somewhere, far away, Bryant Gumbel (who tried his best to investigatively shed light on this exact topic during the Stern regime, and was lambasted for it) is laughing his ass off.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 27, 2014, 06:46:56 PM
Even funnier he made his wife show up to the game. So not only is he not man enough to take the hit in public, he sends the woman he cheated on to face the inevitable questions about what his mistress put on tape.

But did Mrs. Sterling threaten divorce? Nope, she sued the mistress for community property. I mean this is only the kind of crazy you see in the uber-rich.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 27, 2014, 08:10:47 PM
The part where she basically says "well I thought it was OK to leave Matt Kemp in there because he's less black than me" is the cap on the whole what-the-fuckness of it. "I hate black people, except I have a black girlfriend, and somehow I assume she'll be ok with me hating black people." Soooooo weird.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on April 27, 2014, 09:07:06 PM
Not weird for me... maybe because I come from the South. Old racists really like the idea of their strange being a little dark. Probably got something to do with the power trip they can't get because one can't be a slaveowner anymore.  :uhrr: I wish I was kidding, but I'm afraid that's probably closer to the truth than anyone would care to admit.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 27, 2014, 11:04:12 PM
Even funnier he made his wife show up to the game. So not only is he not man enough to take the hit in public, he sends the woman he cheated on to face the inevitable questions about what his mistress put on tape.

But did Mrs. Sterling threaten divorce? Nope, she sued the mistress for community property. I mean this is only the kind of crazy you see in the uber-rich.

Stuff like that happens all the time in this world.  The ol' mistress-embezzlement lawsuit is an age old trick; I've seen it before.  Hell, in my old line of work the owners would give the crew carte blanche and a black amex... then if they had a falling out for whatever reason, it's "you stole from us!"

As for his wife, it's likely she is under a pre-nup that hasn't matured yet... so she's going nowhere until it does.  Also, I dont hold her accountable at all - yet.  It's often women in her situation are the ones that truly appreciate, identify, and empathize with "the help."  That's probably the reason she went to the game; she was supporting her team and quietly siding with them.   She could really give two fucks about Donald, I can guarantee you that... and likely has a boy-toy of her own to toodle around on her jet with.  When her pre-nup is up she'll start liquidating assets and pocketing the cash, just like the mistress did.

Not weird for me... maybe because I come from the South. Old racists really like the idea of their strange being a little dark. Probably got something to do with the power trip they can't get because one can't be a slaveowner anymore.  :uhrr: I wish I was kidding, but I'm afraid that's probably closer to the truth than anyone would care to admit.

I'd agree, but this is not your typical southernish racist issue.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 28, 2014, 12:46:16 AM
Not weird for me... maybe because I come from the South. Old racists really like the idea of their strange being a little dark. Probably got something to do with the power trip they can't get because one can't be a slaveowner anymore.  :uhrr: I wish I was kidding, but I'm afraid that's probably closer to the truth than anyone would care to admit.

 :psyduck:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Sir T on April 28, 2014, 02:16:06 AM
Not weird for me... maybe because I come from the South. Old racists really like the idea of their strange being a little dark. Probably got something to do with the power trip they can't get because one can't be a slaveowner anymore.  :uhrr: I wish I was kidding, but I'm afraid that's probably closer to the truth than anyone would care to admit.

I'd say its more to do with the extra pleasure they get from feeling guilty.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 28, 2014, 06:42:19 AM
Not weird for me... maybe because I come from the South. Old racists really like the idea of their strange being a little dark. Probably got something to do with the power trip they can't get because one can't be a slaveowner anymore.  :uhrr: I wish I was kidding, but I'm afraid that's probably closer to the truth than anyone would care to admit.

 :psyduck:

He's right. That's more common in the south than you'd think.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 28, 2014, 06:43:58 AM
I'd say its more to do with the extra pleasure they get from feeling guilty.

No, Haemish is pretty close to it. There's a power play involved by literally fucking black people for these guys. Then they can discard them at will.

They want sex things they don't have to think of as people.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on April 28, 2014, 08:03:10 AM
Just listened to the whole Deadspin recording. FUCK. ME.

It's not just about having sex with what he considers a lesser human that he can exert power over. It's the same kind of "job creator" power trip over his players. "I feed them, I give them cars and houses."

Fuck that piece of shit in his earhole. I hope the NBA is allowed to revoke his franchise and give it to someone else. All these idiots talking about how the woman that made the tape is a gold digger who is just trying to damage his reputation. AND? How does that make what he said any less despicable? I don't have to give two shits about what this chick was trying to do, she didn't say what he said on that tape, he did.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 28, 2014, 08:08:30 AM
One of the really messed up things about the NBA is bylaws are confidential. So nobody really knows what the maximum penalty is for something like this.

I've never trusted the NBA in terms of being a truly competitive sport. It's fun for what it is, but I think the organization controls which teams are successful to a degree. They thrive on star potential, I think they fix games through the refs, and there are numerous instances where refs have admitted they were fixing games. The lottery is closed, the bylaws are closed. It's just a bunch of shady shit that seems to protect these owners and nobody else.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 28, 2014, 08:50:13 AM
Just listened to the whole Deadspin recording. FUCK. ME.


I'm waiting patiently for the tv-media to play that last bit to the world.  I haven't seen them do it yet.  To me, it's way more of a timebomb than the earlier tapes.  As an aside, Arison (Heat owner) is starting to feel the heat (pun intended) a bit in MIA.  Undeservedly so; I dont believe him to be a racial hardliner.  He's a younger, hipper, more culturally active Arison.  His father (RIP) though?  Not so sure.  Nevertheless, guys in his position have to answer for idiots like Sterling, unfortunately.

As for the NBA and the sports media are concerned, like I said at the start... they will tapdance around much of the issue; likely just chalking up Sterling as your typical bigoted individual w/o tackling the innate cultural differences involved.  And before I get pegged, yes, I have worked directly and closely for a guy just like Sterling - eerily so.  The only reason I stayed on is because of his wife (who was the one that hired me in the 1st place and I knew since I was a kid).  Cool guy mind you and I actually liked him alot - we got along very well.  But deep down we both knew he really could give two fucks.  To him everyone should just stick to their own kind and blacks were lowest on the totem pole.

As a further aside:  The last guy I worked for, a very wealthy Black-American from the south, was also fairly bigoted - mostly towards whites.  Uncomfortably so.  We were friends and close enough that he felt comfortable showing that side to me.  He forgot my mother, and the majority of my close family, are white though.   :oh_i_see:   Needless to say, it was one of the catalysts for me quitting that job.

The only way that type of mentality goes away is for those old crusty WW2 era guys to just die.  That goes for blacks, whites, jews, whatever.

Ahhh memories.  Reminds me of a few months ago when I had to have the HOA scrape the KKK and swastika (done artfully in concrete) off my back sidewalk.  The jewish couple next door were all like "hey, look at that!  One for you and one for me!"  I was all like "yah, more like both for me!  It's in my backyard, not yours."  :awesome_for_real:

p.s.
Just read how Doc Rivers had his house burned down and all of his animals tortured and burned when he lived in San Antonio (likely due to race and marrying outside of it).   :facepalm:
Fuck me, I couldn't do it.  I'd have to walk out of the NBA if I played/coached on the Clippers.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 28, 2014, 10:48:07 AM
Nobody is going to walk away from their money on their contracts as a player. What they will do is not sign any more deals with the Clippers. Now that this is out there, I don't know how the NBA can let him run a team. Why would you sign up to play for a confirmed bigot when there are 29 other teams who would be willing to pay you?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 28, 2014, 10:50:21 AM
Plus, walking out on your contract would just mean that this knob would get to keep more of his money, which I would hardly be inclined to let happen were I one of his players.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on April 29, 2014, 11:29:40 AM
Welp, banned for life and the maximum allowed fine which is a paltry 2.5 mil.  That was the worst they could do, he pretty much has to sell the team at this point.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Trippy on April 29, 2014, 11:37:19 AM
Impressively quick and decisive decision.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on April 29, 2014, 11:38:20 AM
Adam Silver said the owners can force him to sell with a 3/4ths vote, which it seems like they have.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Trippy on April 29, 2014, 11:40:46 AM
And he'll likely make >$500 million from doing so :awesome_for_real: :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on April 29, 2014, 11:41:49 AM
And he'll likely make >$500 million from doing so :awesome_for_real: :oh_i_see:


Yup.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on April 29, 2014, 11:50:07 AM
Adam Silver said the owners can force him to sell with a 3/4ths vote, which it seems like they have.

Considering the Clippers have lost a SHITTON of corporate sponsorship deals in the last 4 days just because of the controversy, I'm pretty sure the other owners will be smart enough to see the writing on the wall, whether they agree with Sterling's racist views or not. Money talks, bullshit walks.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 11:54:10 AM
Yep, if they won't vote him out, the entire world is going to know they condone working with a racist idiot who can't keep his mouth shut or keep it in his pants.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 29, 2014, 11:54:37 AM
And he'll likely make >$500 million from doing so :awesome_for_real: :oh_i_see:


Yup.

Plus whatever profits gleaned from the Clippers going deep into the playoffs, assuming they do.  Recall, the league is largely revenue shared as well.  So Sterling and and his ilk make out like bandits regardless.
This is why most folk with half a brain called for the players and coaches to simply not play.  Any other show of solidarity (like the retarded inside-out shirt crap) is lame beyond belief.

Any other normal work environment, where folk are strapped for cash, living check-to-check, etc. and the employees would walk under racial-harassment.  Women put under similar conditions would do the same.  However, these guys all have golden parachutes, and they all stayed to make this guy money.  It's despicable.  If this was the 60's or they were unpaid amateurs, none of them would be playing tonite.

Therein lie the reason Gumbel did the piece he did on the hypocrisy of the NBA.

Furthermore, no one will remember the '14 Clippers for going deep into the playoffs.  It's unimportant.  They would be remembered as the team that sat out for a racist; which is wholly more credible, important, and valued then even a championship in some cases.  Do none of these fools (including Doc Rivers) see that?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 12:06:03 PM
I'm never going to lambast someone for protecting their own money from a racist idiot. Walking away only voids their contracts.

It's easy when you're guy on the internet with no stake. It's another thing when you're about to give up $10M to make a stand against a guy who didn't do anything criminally wrong. I don't think it's worth it at all. I'd wait for the NBA to do what it's doing, and go on about my business.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 29, 2014, 12:47:44 PM
Good for Silver. Not much else he could really do, but I am sure the Satanic turd he replaced would have done far less, taken far longer, and been far smugger about it at every turn.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 12:48:50 PM
Good for Silver. Not much else he could really do, but I am sure the Satanic turd he replaced would have done far less, taken far longer, and been far smugger about it at every turn.

He'd still be doing his intro speech.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 29, 2014, 01:00:27 PM
Given that Sterling has been a known racist idiot for decades:

- I can't blame the players. They've known about this clown for years, all their predecessors at the Clippers knew about it and did nothing overt, because it was obvious the league didn't care and they have their own careers and families to worry about. Potentially hanging your free agent future out to dry, especially as one of the guys who is more borderline, and in the process giving this chucklefuck several million dollars back doesn't seem like the right move. Collective action has to hurt the target more than it hurts you in order to be a sensible strategy, especially if the reason for it is purely symbolic as it would have been in this case. This wouldn't have been like workers striking for fair pay or safe working conditions. The union doing something league-wide, might have had an effect, because then the borderline guys are protected. A unilateral action by just one team's worth of players? Probably backfires on them and they know it.

- Fuck the league for not doing something about it years ago, like for example when it became public that he doesn't just say vile shit, but actually puts vile shit into action in his day job as a landlord. These guys circled the wagons around him until he forced their hand Marge Schott style, probably because most of them have similarly terrible shit in their closets they don't want dug up. They get no credit from me for doing something they should have done ages ago.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 01:06:28 PM
In a rare case I actually agree with you. They botched this thing from years ago by not kicking his slumlord ass to the curb.

But as I said, I don't trust the NBA to do anything that isn't for shiny veneer. How many owners if we taped them talking about race would have similar issues? I'm betting more than half.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on April 29, 2014, 02:11:48 PM
How many owners if we taped them talking about race would have similar issues? I'm betting more than half.

Probably at least that many. However, they didn't get busted, he did. I think the NBA took the right action with this. They really should have kicked his ass to the curb years ago. The fact that a Justice Department investigation found he was racially discriminating against tenants back in 2006 didn't cause any sort of media stir but a fight with his gold digging girlfriend over a fucking Instagram photo is not only an indictment of the NBA, but the whole goddamn media. I knew NOTHING about that Justice Dept. thing until today. ZERO. Why the fuck was that not front page news?

However, this ought to be a fucking lesson to billionaire shitheads. Stop fucking gold digging bitches young enough to be your fucking granddaughter. Bitches be crazy. You never know what they are going to do and you won't always like it.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 02:34:49 PM
At the very least, be more choosy. I mean if you're worth a billion and own a sports team, I'm fairly sure bitches are literally tossing themselves at you daily. I'm sorry, but as a dude that's almost impossible to ignore. I've seen some of these women at NBA games that are in full chase mode, and it's absurd how hot they are.

If you're going to get some strange you can make them jump through a few hoops at the very least. Get a better screening process.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 29, 2014, 03:00:59 PM
I'm never going to lambast someone for protecting their own money from a racist idiot. Walking away only voids their contracts.

It's easy when you're guy on the internet with no stake. It's another thing when you're about to give up $10M to make a stand against a guy who didn't do anything criminally wrong. I don't think it's worth it at all. I'd wait for the NBA to do what it's doing, and go on about my business.

No stake?  I left my last job partly for similar reasons.  And I left myself w/o a pot to piss in; and it was far from well paying.   Prior to that I had a job for 8+ yrs wherein I was woefully underpaid for similar reasons and had to "quit" ala Elgin Baylor in order to get some semblance of restitution.   Those guys (Clippers) will be just fine (they've been paid for their season already), and likely gain endorsements and better contracts from their actions.... yet they stayed.  Their contracts??  Moot points for a soon-to-be-defunct owner.

Also, realize this.  Sterling now has all the leverage because he will likely be forced to sell.  Which means he'll get the highest bidder and max value for his team... the same team that decided it was smart to not walk away.  Sources say now even, that Sterling has no intention of even selling.

Had they walked, his team would have little value and Sterling would be forced to sell regardless... the same players likely getting picked up by the next regime.

Their current contracts mean absolutely jack and shit except to appease the current owner.  All those contracts would have to be re-written under a new one anyways and the NBA likely would render them currently void regardless.

You can try as you might to convince me otherwise, but I still firmly believe, given all the relevant facts, that a team lockout would've been the smartest option.  Guys like Sterling and leagues like the NBA only get the hint when you quit.  Anything else only serves to line their smug pockets.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 03:06:45 PM
Why in the world would they have to rewrite legally binding contracts because the team sells? That doesn't happen in other industries. You buy what you buy, contracts and all.

Also, I wouldn't walk away from $10M because the guy was a racist jerk. I don't care if I have $20M in the bank. That kind of money isn't something you can just handwave, that's my point. People change their minds when faced with those kinds of tough decisions.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 29, 2014, 03:18:22 PM
Quote
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from fining individuals for opposing discrimination. NBA contracts can also not "contract around" civil rights protections, meaning NBA players who boycott games over an owners' racism may be protected under the law.

Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nba/news/20140426/donald-sterling-la-clippers-adam-silver-nba/#ixzz30JfGDA7M

Contracts get re-negotiated all the time when conditions within the workplace change.  An ownership change due to racism is about a big a change there is.  The players have plenty of power in this.

edit:
Also realize, there's not a league or owner in their right mind that would hang Doc Rivers and the entire Clippers team out to dry.  They could quit and not get paid and still likely be recompensed by the league out of good faith, even if their existing contracts were upheld in court.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 29, 2014, 03:36:46 PM
I'm never going to lambast someone for protecting their own money from a racist idiot. Walking away only voids their contracts.

It's easy when you're guy on the internet with no stake. It's another thing when you're about to give up $10M to make a stand against a guy who didn't do anything criminally wrong. I don't think it's worth it at all. I'd wait for the NBA to do what it's doing, and go on about my business.

No stake?  I left my last job partly for similar reasons.  And I left myself w/o a pot to piss in; and it was far from well paying.   Prior to that I had a job for 8+ yrs wherein I was woefully underpaid for similar reasons and had to "quit" ala Elgin Baylor in order to get some semblance of restitution.   Those guys (Clippers) will be just fine (they've been paid for their season already), and likely gain endorsements and better contracts from their actions.... yet they stayed.  Their contracts??  Moot points for a soon-to-be-defunct owner.

Also, realize this.  Sterling now has all the leverage because he will likely be forced to sell.  Which means he'll get the highest bidder and max value for his team... the same team that decided it was smart to not walk away.  Sources say now even, that Sterling has no intention of even selling.

Had they walked, his team would have little value and Sterling would be forced to sell regardless... the same players likely getting picked up by the next regime.

Their current contracts mean absolutely jack and shit except to appease the current owner.  All those contracts would have to be re-written under a new one anyways and the NBA likely would render them currently void regardless.

You can try as you might to convince me otherwise, but I still firmly believe, given all the relevant facts, that a team lockout would've been the smartest option.  Guys like Sterling and leagues like the NBA only get the hint when you quit.  Anything else only serves to line their smug pockets.

You weren't a union member, right? I think that is an important factor here.

From what I heard on the radio today from Mark Silver, the union was prepared to call a boycott of all 3 games tonight if the penalty for Sterling wasn't high enough, and they had already gotten buy-in from all the players. I would think that should satisfy your wishes here.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 29, 2014, 03:44:52 PM
No, it satisfies nothing but Donald Sterling.  He's still a racist and will now be rewarded handsomely for it.  This time next year you'll find him hiding in a phat penthouse in Tel Aviv so his kin can avoid the estate tax from the billion+ dollar sale of his slave-team.  Satisfied?  Lolz.

I fail to even see how this man was even penalized.  The paltry fine he got doesn't even dent the profits he'll make from the playoffs alone.  And the forced sale of a complete hall-of-fame level team just jacks up the price.  Shit, I wouldn't doubt if he orchestrated the whole thing on purpose.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on April 29, 2014, 03:47:41 PM
I mean in terms of a gesture from the players.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on April 29, 2014, 03:50:41 PM
No, it satisfies nothing but Donald Sterling.  He's still a racist and will now be rewarded handsomely for it.  This time next year you'll find him hiding in a phat penthouse in Tel Aviv so his kin can avoid the estate tax from the billion+ dollar sale of his slave-team.  Satisfied?  Lolz.

I fail to even see how this man was even penalized.  The paltry fine he got doesn't even dent the profits he'll make from the playoffs alone.  And the forced sale of a complete hall-of-fame level team just jacks up the price.  Shit, I wouldn't doubt if he orchestrated the whole thing on purpose.

If he wanted to sell the team he could've just done so.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 29, 2014, 04:18:56 PM
I posit he doesn't want to sell the team right now because he'd have to give his wife a large chunk of the proceeds.  Why do you think she hung around and allowed him to roam freely with his adulteress?  I'm sure she's got a pre-nup; when it matures he'll sell the team.  If the league forces him to sell earlier, it may abdicate him of having to give her as much money... if any at all.   Regardless, it's another chip in Donald's favor as he'll require more recompense with his wife in the picture.   Furthermore, his tax base is not likely setup quite yet to maximally benefit from a sale at this time (as I somewhat alluded to before).

He'll stall to get his ducks in a row I'm sure.

I'd say if there's any real penalty in all of this, is that the sudden force of sale will make it more difficult to hide his money.  But that's it.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 05:25:08 PM
We're not going to cut his head off in the street and seize his assets for being a bigot. This isn't a revolution.

Removing him from the league is the best solution. You don't just get to steal the man's team because he's an asshole.

EDIT: Also here's a problem I have with the boycott idea, did he discriminate against players based on race? I don't think it's that cut and dry.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on April 29, 2014, 06:15:11 PM
Actually there were reports that he wanted to nix the Reddick trade because he didn't want to pay that much for a white player.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on April 29, 2014, 06:22:01 PM
Let's get this out of the way.  He does not own the team, he owns the Clippers.  There is a difference.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on April 29, 2014, 06:37:02 PM
He's a billionaire in America. Short of the actual blood in the streets, there is no penalty anyone in this fucking country can stick to him that won't leave him still insanely wealthy and immune. The NBA did the most it could do, apparently, and the deal was signed off on by the player's union, which means the players didn't have to and shouldn't pull a boycott. Would it hurt him? A little but in the long run, this isn't about punishing him so much as just getting him and his toxic PR away from the league.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on April 29, 2014, 06:56:49 PM
Let's get this out of the way.  He does not own the team, he owns the Clippers.  There is a difference.

He won't own anything in the NBA soon.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Sir T on May 01, 2014, 01:01:51 AM
In an interesting response, the NBA released it's formerly secret constitution yesterday.

http://mediacentral.nba.com/media/mediacentral/NBA-Constitution-and-By-Laws.pdf

Two lawyers on another forum I read have looked it over, and they think the 2.5 million fine looks really iffy, and the NBA is in for a really hard fight if they want to force him out. the 2.5 Million fine is based on Article 24(l), but that provision only applies in cases where no other rule applies. Article 35A(d) covers conduct prejudicial or detrimental to the organization, and allows the lifetime ban, but allows for a max 1 million fine. So if Sterling decides to fight that fine he is is on very solid ground.

Worse, forcing him out is going to be harder. Their attempt is probably going to be based on Article 13(a) - but that article requires a willful violation of the Constitution/Bylaws. Given that the remarks were made in an illegally recorded and subsequently leaked private conversation, "willful" is going to be a very hard sell. Particularly since the remarks were on the privacy of his own home and regarded personal matters mainly.

So if sterling decides to fight this on a matter of principle he actually has a strong case.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on May 01, 2014, 01:49:31 AM
There is all kinds of other pressure though.  Doc Rivers will quit if he is the owner next year, or so he says.  Tons of sponsors have pulled out.  If he remains owner, I think we might seem players refusing to play.  There is more than just a legal battle going on.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Yegolev on May 01, 2014, 06:47:35 AM
In related news, Harry Reid is asking Dan Snyder to rename his team.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on May 01, 2014, 04:16:38 PM
In related news, Harry Reid is asking Dan Snyder to rename his team.

I asked for that for years, ever since I was a little kid watching the NFL actually.  It's always been a ridiculous team name to me, especially given the location of the team.

There is all kinds of other pressure though.  Doc Rivers will quit if he is the owner next year, or so he says.  Tons of sponsors have pulled out.  If he remains owner, I think we might seem players refusing to play.  There is more than just a legal battle going on.

And they just go back to being the old clippers.   :oh_i_see:
The player's union (or clippers team) not acting quickly just made this whole situation a lot more complicated then it needed to be.  The fact that they were locked-out not too long ago and negotiated a contract largely not in their own favor, furthers the lunacy.

Doc knows deep down they shouldn't have played; you can see it on his face.  He holds his tongue for his players' sake, as a professional, but if he had absolute authority over what the team would do - they wouldn't be playing.

Meh, I'm done with it (at least this particular bout with racism).  Now 'scuse me while I go re-fill out some job applications.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 01, 2014, 04:19:44 PM
I'll agree with you on one point, the NBA players union is one of the worst in professional sports.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on May 01, 2014, 04:54:47 PM
I don't think we can assume the conversation was illegally recorded; per at least some writers, Sterling supposedly actually asked to have his conversations recorded because he was having trouble remembering things.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on May 02, 2014, 10:31:00 PM
Holy shit, Portland.

This first round has been great.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on May 03, 2014, 03:16:11 PM
That's all I need is another reason to move to the Pacific NW.  Fuckers are good at everything these days... plus the min. wage is now higher.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on May 03, 2014, 11:00:41 PM
/knocks over gameboard

I hate Matt Barnes so much.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on May 04, 2014, 02:19:49 PM


However, this ought to be a fucking lesson to billionaire shitheads. Stop fucking gold digging bitches young enough to be your fucking granddaughter. Bitches be crazy. You never know what they are going to do and you won't always like it.  :why_so_serious:

Then what's the point of being a billionaire shithead? The problem here wasn't the gold digger, it was the wife who went after her to try to get the money back and put her into revenge mode.  You can't sue the poor girl after she's had to deal with his wrinkly old man balls, i don't care how many millions she took him for, they were well earned.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on May 04, 2014, 06:19:21 PM
Apparently in California, you can sue the mistress?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ghambit on May 05, 2014, 09:36:35 AM


However, this ought to be a fucking lesson to billionaire shitheads. Stop fucking gold digging bitches young enough to be your fucking granddaughter. Bitches be crazy. You never know what they are going to do and you won't always like it.  :why_so_serious:

Then what's the point of being a billionaire shithead? The problem here wasn't the gold digger, it was the wife who went after her to try to get the money back and put her into revenge mode.  You can't sue the poor girl after she's had to deal with his wrinkly old man balls, i don't care how many millions she took him for, they were well earned.

This.
Also, half the economy of my environs (SoFla) would cease to exist if these types of lawsuits ran rampant and the general lifestyle became taboo.  It is what it is.  As for the 1.5m the wife sued for??  absolute fuckin peanuts in the grande scheme of things.  It's not even cash, it's assets (condo, cars, etc.) bought for the mistress.  She never had the cash to begin with, and it's possible she never even had true ownership.

Good for him I say, even though he's a prick.  She'll help keep him interested in life, young, in tune with the current generation, etc.   Look at it like an old vampire taking young familiars.  Same deal.
Tbh, a few of my old friends would likely be dead (or have died sooner) had they not had gf/wives 20+ years younger then them.  The billionaire's mindset accounts for this; it's not simply dicks and giggles.

Hell, I know guys who go through both a mistress and the mistress' daughter.  When one runs dry, he contracts out the next (who's already familiar with the lifestyle).  The mistress and her family are set for life; millionaires in their own right and entrenched in old-money. 



Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on May 20, 2014, 05:40:25 PM
Cleveland gets the first pick again.  Let's see if they can out do the epic fuck up of last year.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Hoax on May 20, 2014, 06:40:35 PM
The fat kid from UNLV never turned into anything so far right?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Mosesandstick on May 20, 2014, 11:37:18 PM
I think Bennett was getting a lot better but then he went down with an injury.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 06:33:21 AM
The lottery just keeps looking more and more rigged every year.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Hoax on May 21, 2014, 07:13:58 AM
Must be the jews.

There is literally no theory in the world where sane people would believe that someone is rigging things in Cleveland's favor. Or is it rigged to help MJ and the Bobcats Hornets from whichever Carolina? Please stop being such an idiot.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 07:21:27 AM
The odds of Cleveland actually winning 3 years given the percentages is something like .007 percent.

At what point of ridiculous odds do you not question what's going on here?

EDIT: My problem with the draft is the appearance. The NBA already has had scandals of rigging in the past with the refs. The league itself holds this thing behind closed doors for literally no reason at all. None. There is no viable purpose for hiding the draft other than confusing the issue.

Another site saying the odds of this happening at 1 in 8 million. It's just absurd.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Trippy on May 21, 2014, 07:35:40 AM
The Clippers have won it 5 times and the Magic have won it 3 times (same as Cleveland).


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 07:45:51 AM
Absolutely, but when the Clippers won with a 2.8% chance, the pick went to Cleveland. Cleveland also won with a 1.7% chance and a 15.60% chance. All of this happening since Lebron left in a 4 year time frame.

Prior to this 4 year stretch, 9 other teams have won, and nobody has won twice in a five year stretch. Once the Bulls won with a 1.7% chance. The average was around 11.50%.



Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on May 21, 2014, 08:31:45 AM
and nobody has won twice in a five year stretch.


Orlando won back to back in the 90s, turned into Shaq and Penny.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 08:32:30 AM
I should have clarified since 2000.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on May 21, 2014, 08:33:53 AM
The odds of Cleveland actually winning 3 years given the percentages is something like .007 percent.

At what point of ridiculous odds do you not question what's going on here?

EDIT: My problem with the draft is the appearance. The NBA already has had scandals of rigging in the past with the refs. The league itself holds this thing behind closed doors for literally no reason at all. None. There is no viable purpose for hiding the draft other than confusing the issue.

Another site saying the odds of this happening at 1 in 8 million. It's just absurd.

Question what? that the NBA would rig the draft to benefit a boring shitty franchise nobody gives a shit about while screwing the Lakers and Celtics?  the fact that it was the cavaliers is about the best proof you could have that it isn't fixed.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 08:44:00 AM
You guys think the NBA needs to further help the Lakers and Celtics? Those franchises will draw no matter what, and have the money to fix whatever problems they encounter.

Teams like Boston, Chicago, LA, New York they don't struggle to fill the stands, put eyeballs on the TV, or draw attention. Even when losing. The Lakers were hot garbage this year and still finished 8th in attendance.

Cleveland is in a market that will show up for a product, and that can be nationally interesting. They are centered in an area of the country that loves basketball. The NBA has been trying to make them attractive for free agents for the last few years to correct the LeBron issue. You're talking about a city that would fall over itself to hand the NBA money if they are remotely relevant.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on May 21, 2014, 08:48:43 AM
Yeah no, there is no way the NBA is happy with the Lakers and Celtics and Knicks being bottom feeders.  The franchises themselves don't need help, but it benefits the NBA tremendously to have their best known teams be at the top.  To the NBA the Lakers/Celtics/Knicks being the top three picks would have been ideal, of course then you would really need to start questioning the validity of the lottery, not to mention it wasn't even technically possible for the knicks to even have a pick.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Hoax on May 21, 2014, 09:37:03 AM
You guys think the NBA needs to further help the Lakers and Celtics? Those franchises will draw no matter what, and have the money to fix whatever problems they encounter.

Teams like Boston, Chicago, LA, New York they don't struggle to fill the stands, put eyeballs on the TV, or draw attention. Even when losing. The Lakers were hot garbage this year and still finished 8th in attendance.

Cleveland is in a market that will show up for a product, and that can be nationally interesting. They are centered in an area of the country that loves basketball. The NBA has been trying to make them attractive for free agents for the last few years to correct the LeBron issue. You're talking about a city that would fall over itself to hand the NBA money if they are remotely relevant.

When this is your argument you really would be better off blaming the jews. Give me a fucking break. Nobody cares about Orlando basketball or Cleveland basketball nationally. It could much more easily be argued that the Cavs getting #1 is the worst case scenario for the league. Its much less exciting than if Detroit or LA or Boston was adding a top 3 pick to their rosters. The feel good small market team of the era is undoubtedly the Suns so the sports media would be gushing if they had won it. The Cavs getting #1 has been met with a resounding "oh great, how can they fuck it up this time?". So its not good press for the league. It doesn't energize an almost there roster (the Cavs are a fucking mess with locker issues and no coach) into a fresh new contender it doesn't make your big draw teams better. This is the most asinine conspiracy ever.

Imagine if New Orleans had beaten the odds even that might have put a new team on the map in the next couple of years. There is almost no upside to the Cavs getting the chance to continue to be a joke-ass franchise despite getting yet another top pick. Unless the conspiracy is to prove how much god hates Cleveland and make Gilbert look like the biggest shithead in the nba not named Sterling.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on May 21, 2014, 10:04:39 AM
Cavs are going to pull an Oden and draft Embiid.  Big man with health issues... GOGOGOGOGO. Not drafting Wiggins or Parker at this point is a pretty stupid movi, which is why they most definitely will do it.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 10:25:18 AM
None of your points explain the absurdity of the math behind these draws in the last 4 years. It puts a pretty hefty strain on probability given the two times they won with less than 3% in a short time frame.

People care nationally about whatever teams have the stars on them. Nobody gave a shit about the Clippers until the stars showed up there. Or OKC for that matter nationally. The cities are irrelevant to the NBA other than if they are a top 20 TV market. Send stars where ever and as long as you put the product on TV, the NBA will be just fine. It runs completely unopposed for the most part during the playoffs.

The reason for the NBA manipulating things could be as simple as a deal cut with Stern when Lebron left, or that the NBA didn't want to reward Philly for absolutely tanking, or that the balls simply fell true this year after previous rigged years making them look stupid.

Either way, rigged or not, there's no reason to put it behind closed doors in today's media connected world. People said it was fucking insane that the NBA would rig games, and yet people are in jail for it as we speak.



Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on May 21, 2014, 10:29:36 AM
People went to jail for rigging games for themselves, not on behalf of the NBA.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on May 21, 2014, 10:33:30 AM
This is a terrible conspiracy theory. Unlikely events are not impossible events.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 10:37:22 AM
People went to jail for rigging games for themselves, not on behalf of the NBA.

That's not what one of the convicted refs says. He's said repeatedly that the NBA wanted series to go to 7 games, and the refs complied.

As far as the lottery, the problem I have with probability apologists is that no matter how long of a shot something is, they can always pat themselves on the back since "it's not impossible" or "it happened."

It's never an indication that the odds aren't what they thought they were or could have been manipulated in a closed door event. We could fictionally run it a billion more times in their heads, and they can sleep comfortably at night.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on May 21, 2014, 10:46:25 AM
You really think all the other owners would be on board with picking out 1 owner and showering them with extra help?

The shit with the Chris Paul trade - that's fertile ground for suspecting people were fucking around with things. The lottery just doesn't have a smoking gun at all.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on May 21, 2014, 10:57:09 AM
You really think all the other owners would be on board with picking out 1 owner and showering them with extra help?

The shit with the Chris Paul trade - that's fertile ground for suspecting people were fucking around with things. The lottery just doesn't have a smoking gun at all.

I think the owners only care about cashflow. There's going to be $200M changing hands by new year due to the new CBA. If the owners are having to fork over money to the other teams, the NBA needs to make sure it's not going straight down the toilet.

The Chris Paul trade is another issue but a good point. Even since the cheating scandal was proven with the refs, regardless of the denials by the league that they had any part of it, I've never trusted them again. I'll continue to point it out over and over. Why is this behind closed doors? What possible gain is there other than manipulation? With the tarnish of that scandal, and the inevitable questions about it, the fact it isn't done in the open is just pure hubris especially if the process is above reproach as they say.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on May 21, 2014, 11:27:03 AM
The Chris Paul thing was a perfectly logical action taken by the league as owners of the hornets.  If any other GM had come to any other owner with that deal they would have been told to fuck off.  You don't trade a star for established players on bloated contracts, that was insanely retarded. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on May 31, 2014, 08:59:08 PM
Go Spurs I guess? They're like the only team in any sport from Texas I don't mind rooting for.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on June 01, 2014, 10:47:45 AM
I still can't believe they gave away a 5 point lead in 30 seconds on a championship deciding game by pulling Duncan out twice.  Hopefully homecourt advantage this time around makes things easier for them. Duncan shows absolutely no signs of slowing down, the man is not human.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on June 08, 2014, 08:18:08 AM
All is lost. (http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2014/6/3/5772796/nba-y2k-series-finale-the-death-of-basketball) Hilarious article about the end of the NBA (in a videogame).  The GIFs alone make it worth the read.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on June 08, 2014, 05:07:53 PM
My roommate and I used to play franchise mode on games like this back in college.  We used to make it our mission to get great stats with the terrible new players.  It was difficult.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ginaz on June 15, 2014, 10:22:01 PM
Well, Heat are done.  I guess getting to (and winning 2) NBA finals is good but losing this one sinks any claim Lebron is better than Jordan.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on June 15, 2014, 10:45:06 PM
He's 29 years old, it's way too early to draw conclusions on that sort of thing. I'm also not sure I'd say any of the teams Jordan faced in the finals were of San Antonio's caliber - they're just absurdly deep and well-coached - and Jordan had a better second banana in Scottie Pippen than LeBron has had in Dwayne Wade (late career version).

I mean I'm not going to say LeBron is better at this point, but the argument is a long, long way from over.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ginaz on June 15, 2014, 11:50:41 PM
He's 29 years old, it's way too early to draw conclusions on that sort of thing. I'm also not sure I'd say any of the teams Jordan faced in the finals were of San Antonio's caliber - they're just absurdly deep and well-coached - and Jordan had a better second banana in Scottie Pippen than LeBron has had in Dwayne Wade (late career version).

I mean I'm not going to say LeBron is better at this point, but the argument is a long, long way from over.

Jordan was 6-0 in the finals (the only team with multiple titles in history never to have lost).  Lebron is 2-3.  Not only has Lebron lost 3 finals, his teams lost badly in each of them.  Jordan had way lesser teammates to work with than Lebron has had (minus his one finals with Cleveland) and the teams he faced were comparable in skill to the ones Lebron has faced.  Bottom line, if you could only pick one, who would you have play on your team in an NBA final?  Jordan or Lebron?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on June 16, 2014, 12:44:58 AM
I don't agree at all with your assessment of Jordan's teammates. Scottie Pippen was a better player than either Wade or Bosh, IMO, and it sounds to me like you're significantly underrating Horace Grant and Dennis Rodman.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on June 16, 2014, 06:58:26 AM
The NBA is finally getting to the point where team is trumping the idea that "one guy" can make a team. San Antonio was the best team, with the best play, and they shot the ball the best. The advent of coaches realizing that defense and the 3-ball is the key to victory? It's changed the star player garbage in order to succeed.

San Antonio has awesome talent, but they are balanced and very deep. They share. They move the ball and they shoot when they are open. They play shut down defense with all the guys playing both sides of the floor. That's what wins. I love that about the game, and I really hope it continues to win in the future, because the NBA desperately needs to get back to solid basketball with less bullshit flashy talk. Stern is gone. Selling the big stars is fine, but believing they are the difference between winning and losing trophies is ridiculous.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on June 16, 2014, 07:02:23 AM
Miami didn't just lose, they got epically embarrassed.  Sweet georgia brown should've been playing whenever the Spurs got the ball.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on June 16, 2014, 07:56:09 AM
ESPN is the biggest culprit of the what I call the Star Farce in sports right now. They continually drive home the fallacy to fans that Stars are what win. And when it doesn't happen, they focus the narrative on those stars choking.

The people in the media aren't talking about how San Antonio won the series and didn't make it even sporting. They are talking about how Lebron choked, and how for some reason Carmello Anthony will make the Heat better if he transfers. It's stupid.

They do the same thing with QB's in football. IT'S ABOUT LEET QB'S EVERYBODY! Oh except Eli, and Joe Flacco, and Russell Westbrook. But they are elite now that they won right? Because stars right?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on June 16, 2014, 09:19:09 AM
Meh, the Spurs are a great team who play wonderfully together but they are not lacking in stars either.  They had three hall of famers and an emerging star on that team.  It is mostly true that you are not going to win without superstars in this league, the Spurs wouldn't have done this without Parker Duncan and Ginobli no matter how good their system is.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: HaemishM on June 16, 2014, 09:21:22 AM
I don't agree at all with your assessment of Jordan's teammates. Scottie Pippen was a better player than either Wade or Bosh, IMO, and it sounds to me like you're significantly underrating Horace Grant and Dennis Rodman.

This. I don't even know shit about the modern NBA, but I can tell you now, Rodman is still considered one of the best defensive players in the game. Jordan had a load of good players around him AND a HOF coach as well. Even if you consider Miami a dream team type of situation, it's not ever been the quality of the Bulls during their title runs.

EDIT: Also, again not knowing much of shit about the modern NBA, but I know enough to know that Carmelo Anthony would not make this Heat team better but worse. That's just what they need, a ball-hawking man-baby who has to be the center of attention on whatever team he's on having to share the spotlight with the guy the entire sports media world thinks is the greatest basketball player on the planet.

NO.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on June 16, 2014, 09:26:14 AM
Miami is extremely top heavy, Lebron Wade and Bosh are better than almost all other best teams ever top three.  The rest of the team is super hot garbage though, Ray Allen's skeleton is the only other decent player on that team.  Wade is almost done too and Bosh is completely wasted in their system.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on June 16, 2014, 09:31:55 AM
The supporting cast in Miami is pretty awful and never really gelled.  The East was just so bad that it didn't matter at all.  So with the Heat you have a top shelf Lebron, a beat-up Wade, and whatever the hell Bosh is right now (it seems like they fit him in better last year).   The rest are either washed up or too inconsistent to matter.   Anytime you have Mario Chalmers playing significant minutes, you know you are hurting.  He's like having Mo Williams.  There is no reason you want this guy doing anything, but sometimes you don't have any better options.

The Spurs, on the other hand, were finally healthy and Leonard has developed into a core member. Plus, they have a ton of quality subs that can play significant minutes.  Oh, and they're the best three point shooting team.  And have guys that have been playing together longer than most other players have even been in the league.  They are a well built team, like a more talent diffused version of the Bulls.

I don't think if you swapped James for Jordan, the series would have been any different.  


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Nebu on June 16, 2014, 10:05:20 AM
LeBron did pretty well to carry the Cavs on his back in 06-07.  Granted, the Spurs outmatched them in the finals.  I'd say that LeBron is about as good as anyone that has ever played the game.  He's just different from Michael, Larry, or Magic.  Karl Malone would be another person that carried a team on his back but didn't have quite enough to win a championship (no, I didn't forget about Stockton... he just wasn't good from a scoring perspective).  

It really does take a team effort to win a final, but one strong player can carry you there.  


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on June 16, 2014, 10:16:27 AM
This seems like the expected result to me.  A rematch from last year where the Spurs gave the Heat all the could handle.  This year, the Spurs are a little better and the Heat are a little worse. 

It'll be interesting to see if this Heat team stays together another year.  The East is so bad they can probably make it back to the finals, but can they really beat whatever the West throws at them regardless?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Shannow on June 16, 2014, 10:22:04 AM
Australians on the Spurs? 2
Australians on the Heat? 0

Coincidence? I think not!


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Cyrrex on June 16, 2014, 11:29:56 PM
Re:  Lebron vs. Jordan

Their raw ability may well be equal.  Hell, given his physical stature, Lebron may have the edge.  But here's the thing:  Michael Jordan was nearly invincible.  He smashed everyone, all the time, and you could basically never get the better of him.  He beat the shit out of you when he was the only talent on his team.  And then, when surrounded by talent later in his career, he made it so the other guys also beat the shit out of you.  And when the other guys were having a bad day, he swooped in like Superman and beat the shit out of you some more.  Every.  Fucking.  Time.  You could not break that motherfucker.  He had a chip on his shoulder basically all the time, and good luck to you if you had to go up against him.

Lebron, on the other hand, is as fragile as glass in comparison.  Totally breakable, totally beatable.  He does not have the mental fortitude that Jordan had, not even half of it. 

The series that Miami just got blow the fuck out of?  Michael Jordan would simply not have let that happen.  Not like that.  That is the difference.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 16, 2014, 11:38:51 PM
We are talking about the same MJ who was swept out of the playoffs multiple times, lost to the same team three years in a row and quit basketball twice?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on June 16, 2014, 11:50:29 PM
gibberish

(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/82533/docrivers.gif)

Can you produce a chart of their clutchedness (3 dimensional moxie v. grit v. indestructability)?


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Cyrrex on June 17, 2014, 12:18:38 AM
We are talking about the same MJ who was swept out of the playoffs multiple times, lost to the same team three years in a row and quit basketball twice?

I don't think I got across the point I was intending.  It wasn't that he never failed, because he did so often enough early in his career.  It was his mindset that he wasn't going to fail if there was any damned thing he could do about it.  I don't see that in Lebron.

I wonder if some of you are even old enough to have watched his full career.  If you are just looking at historical records, you won't have a clue.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on June 17, 2014, 07:19:20 AM
It was his mindset that he wasn't going to fail if there was any damned thing he could do about it.  I don't see that in Lebron.


So basically you just like the fact that he was an angry asshole?

Look, Jordan was amazing.  But the way you're talking about him is the way people talk about myths, not real people.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on June 17, 2014, 08:40:12 AM
Jordan was a jerk. He still is a jerk. He's one of the worst tippers alive, and to hear Charles Barkley tell it Jordan would spit on every cinnamon roll his private chef made so that nobody else could have one, even if there were leftovers. That's not a joke, Barkley actually said that in an interview.

Lebron will never live up to Jordan's legacy because Jordan's team was better. But nobody cares about the teams in American media. They single out one guy because it's easier to sell.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on June 26, 2014, 04:52:05 PM
So I guess the draft for this is going on right now or something.  You can tell how much this board is in to the NBA by hype in this thread.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on June 27, 2014, 07:00:38 PM
So I guess the draft for this is going on right now or something.  You can tell how much this board is in to the NBA by hype in this thread.

My team didn't have a pick.  :-P


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on June 29, 2014, 11:46:36 AM
Unless you are a cavs bucks or sixers fan the draft wasn't terribly interesting.  I hope the guy my magic took over Exum turns out to be worth it.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Mithas on July 11, 2014, 09:47:16 AM
So he is headed back to Cleveland.

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/eye-on-basketball/24616046/lebron-james-announces-return-to-cleveland-cavaliers

I'm a little surprised. I believe he would have gotten more money in Miami plus an already proven team. I guess if he wins in Cleveland, they will erect statues of him.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on July 11, 2014, 09:52:37 AM
I think that's a fun move.  The Miami big 3 was producing rather boring basketball and Dwayne Wade's knees are being held together with dental floss and the happy thoughts of children.

Lebron has 2 championships.  He won't end up being a Karl Malone or Charles Barkley. He can't be Jordan on court, and I don't think he really wants to.  He can basically do whatever he wants and this instantly makes Cleveland the odds on favorite in the east to go to the finals given that Bosh will probably land in the west. 

This greatly raises his post basketball earning potential and helps him finish out his career on a good note. 


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on July 11, 2014, 09:54:44 AM
He's righting a wrong, and this time they have the pieces to make it possibly work.

I don't think it WILL work, but the potential is higher there than in Miami plus the feels, man.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Rasix on July 11, 2014, 09:55:54 AM
Kyrie Irving is a big upgrade over Mo Williams.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: 01101010 on July 11, 2014, 10:07:37 AM
So he is headed back to Cleveland.

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/eye-on-basketball/24616046/lebron-james-announces-return-to-cleveland-cavaliers

I'm a little surprised. I believe he would have gotten more money in Miami plus an already proven team. I guess if he wins in Cleveland, they will erect statues of him.

If anyone brings Cleveland a championship (in any sport), they'll erect statues. Sadly, I still don't see it happening.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 11, 2014, 10:10:45 AM
I am not sure I can adequately express how fucking sick I am of hearing about anything to do with LeBron fucking James. I hope he falls into the Cuyahoga and is burned to death before he drowns just so everyone will SHUT THE FUCK UP about him.


e- saw this on Twitter and had to share.

Most popular search in Cleveland right now-

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsR1btLIIAEHDYx.png)


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Jeff Kelly on July 11, 2014, 05:26:53 PM
Wait, so the team that LeBron publicly humiliated in front of millions with his 'The Decision' shit will take him back?

Wow


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on July 11, 2014, 05:36:39 PM
It's a business.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Paelos on July 11, 2014, 05:41:10 PM
Wait, so the team that LeBron publicly humiliated in front of millions with his 'The Decision' shit will take him back?

Wow

Fans are all whores in varying degrees. They'll put up with anything for wins.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Nevermore on July 11, 2014, 05:56:12 PM
Yeah well, Gilbert didn't behave any better and LeBron is still going back. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ingmar on July 11, 2014, 05:59:56 PM
I'd say he behaved worse, really. That's the part that surprises me more - LeBron going back, not LeBron being taken back.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Mithas on July 11, 2014, 11:26:40 PM
Fans/ESPN will eat this shit up. They will love him more than before he left. Prodigal son and all that. Lebron is smart, he has played this perfectly. He will make even more from endorsements than he would have if he'd stayed in Miami.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: DevilsAdvocate25 on July 22, 2014, 11:06:32 AM
Fans/ESPN will eat this shit up. They will love him more than before he left. Prodigal son and all that. Lebron is smart, he has played this perfectly. He will make even more from endorsements than he would have if he'd stayed in Miami.

Not only that, but he no longer has the pressure to win a championship, since he has his rings. Now he can rightly point the finger at the organization and tell them to put up the money and get him the players and he will lead them to a championship and it can't come back on him for not being a winner, since he already is.


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Ginaz on July 24, 2014, 04:16:32 PM
Morgan Freeman reads Lebron's letter on going back to Cleveland. :awesome_for_real:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj9Ei7FGQgg


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Malakili on February 09, 2015, 12:55:09 PM
DeMarcus Cousins went off on an incoherent rant about "god's plan" after a recent game, apparently:

Quote
"I ain't pumped up. I've just got a lot on my mind," he told reporters. "The crazy thing about it is, I've just got a question for y'all: How you gonna stop God's plan? How you gonna do that? How you gonna do that? That's all I want to know. How you gonna stop God's plan?

"Man, this city done put me through so much, and I stayed loyal to it the whole time. Hey, I just wanna know, how you gonna stop God's plan? God gives his hardest battles to his strongest soldiers. The marathon continues. I'm out."

 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: 2014 NBA
Post by: Threash on February 09, 2015, 01:21:04 PM
Is that you Kanye?