f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Sports / Fantasy Sports => Topic started by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 10:01:18 AM



Title: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 10:01:18 AM
This seems to have been a good draft.  Of course, there is no way to know until years later (2000 draft case in point).

Some thoughts:

1.  Cousins-  this could be a Michael Jordan type draft fuckup for the four teams that chose not to take him.  The guy is an absolute beast with a bit of a mean streak.  Both go well in the NBA.  I expect him to be spectacular.
2.  Wall-  Again, great pick.  I don't think he'll be quite as good as everyone expects on the offensive end, but I do think his defense is underrated.  
3.  Turner-  Think he may turn out to be a Tayshaun Prince type, good for 12-15 points a game and a few assists/rebounds.  I question this at the #2 pick.
4.  Favors-  lots of potential but raw.  Risky pick.  
5.  Monroe-  the Pistons are so happy that Monroe fell to seventh and that the Warriors (in typical Warrior fashion) made a very doltish pick with Udoh.  
6.  Aminu-  another steal.  Should have gone a bit higher, in my opinion.
7.  James Anderson-  the Spurs do it again.  This guy is a great pick.  
8.  The rest of the draft generally sucked.  It was very top heavy in talent.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 25, 2010, 10:48:28 AM
I'll preface this by saying I live in Atlanta, so I get a lot of the sports talk/love from around the area, but Favors is an outright stupid pick over Cousins. He is lazy as hell, not physcial enough and only won rookie of the year in the ACC because the best teams in the conference didn't have any rookies playing.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on June 25, 2010, 10:59:58 AM
The Utah Jazz select... the best white guy available!


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 11:02:27 AM
Hayward might have been a decent choice if he could shoot, but he is a 29% three point shooter.  He was a decent defender in college, but guarding Kobe Bryant is a whole different ball of wax. 

This guy will make Adam Morrison look like a smart choice before it's all over. 


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Malakili on June 25, 2010, 11:04:35 AM
The Utah Jazz select... the best white guy available!

I couldn't help but think the same thing.


I watched some of this, and I'm not a HUGE basketball fan, so I can't give a ton of useful feedback, but I was a bit surprised at just how quickly there stopped being names I recognized.  Now, like I said that isn't saying much, but it did seem like a fairly mediocre draft class to me.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on June 25, 2010, 11:06:48 AM
This guy will make Adam Morrison look like a smart choice before it's all over.  

I can't help but think you're right here.  He's soft, undersized, and a bad shooter.  Talented, but then again, so is everyone else in the NBA.  Drafting someone almost purely on their tournament heroics is a bad idea.

edit:  I'm not really an NBA fan in the slightest.  I do love drafts though, always interesting to see what happens.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Nebu on June 25, 2010, 11:12:37 AM
I think Wall is the only player with any superstar potential and that won't be realized for 3 years.  He may be the fastest player I've ever seen from line to line, but he panics when going to the hole against a big man and still has turnover issues.  He's also worthless beyond 19 feet. 

Evan Turner is coming back from a back injury.  I don't know why any team would take a risk on him in the first round beyond the fact that there's just noone very interesting in this year's draft after Wall.   


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 11:37:22 AM
Yeah, I'm much more of a fan of the college game in both football and basketball.  That is why I love the draft, I guess.

Another couple of lost souls that went very, very late based on talent:  Wayne Chism from Tennessee and Stanley Robinson from UConn.  Robinson is better than half the guys in the first round. 


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Nebu on June 25, 2010, 11:43:34 AM
I think the most difficult part about drafting for the pros would be projecting future value.  You want to grab a player that hasn't peaked yet.  I think this is precisely the reason that the general population grumbles with many picks.  It's not about taking the player that is best now.  It's about taking the player that will be best in 2-3 years.  


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 11:53:42 AM
Exactly.  And then factor in injuries and psychological issues and it can become a real crap shoot.  That's how  you end up with Sam Bowie being drafted ahead of Michael Jordan. 

Sometimes though, you really have to question the intelligence of NBA GMs.  Here are some NBA number one picks that either already are head scratchers or are heading that way:

1.  Michael Olowokandi (1998)
2.  Joe Smith (1995)
3.  Kenyon Martin (2000)
4.  Kwame Brown (2001)
5.  Andrew Bogut (2005)
6.  Gred Oden (2007)

And I will go on record as saying that Yao Ming will be viewed as a bust before it's all said and done, even though he was the right choice.  Man that was a hideous draft.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Nebu on June 25, 2010, 11:56:13 AM
You can't coach height.  A player with good hands and size will have greater value than a smaller skilled player in many cases.  Most of the players on that list are 6'9" or taller.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 12:01:52 PM
Very true.  If you look at the NBA "impact players" that are critical to their teams' successes right now, though, very few of them are above 6'9".  I still don't understand why GMs continue to worry about having a great center.  Small forward/shooting guard is where championships are generally won in the NBA and that is where the most legendary players reside-  Kobe and MJ being good examples of players that carry their team from that position.  Certainly you have to build around those players a solid team, but teams never seem to do well drafting for height and then building around the Center position. 


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on June 25, 2010, 12:15:45 PM
Andrew Bogut is turning into one of the bestbetter centers in the league.  I don't know if that is just saying something about the quality of big men in the league, but he may turn out to have been a good pick when it's all said and done.  Of course, he did go ahead of Chris Paul and Deron Wiliams, but the rest of the draft was mediocre to poor that year.



Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 25, 2010, 04:26:00 PM
By the time it's done, I'm pretty sure Andrew Bogut will not be considered a bad pick. He's already one of the best defensive players in the league.

Pretty much every championship team has had a dominant big man. Gasol, Garnett, Duncan, Wallaces, Shaq. The teams that didn't have one (notably MJ) were exceptional (best perimeter defenders, etc.) I think that's why GMs are so willing to try and strike it lucky with height.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on June 25, 2010, 08:19:31 PM
Andrew Bogut is turning into one of the bestbetter centers in the league.  


No argument there.  I don't think he's going to lead the Bucks to the championship anytime soon, though. 

Out of that draft I would have taken Deron Williams, Chris Paul and Andrew Bynum ahead of Bogut. 


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: FatuousTwat on June 25, 2010, 09:16:41 PM
FUCKING ODEN. >:(


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 25, 2010, 09:28:42 PM
Very true.  If you look at the NBA "impact players" that are critical to their teams' successes right now, though, very few of them are above 6'9".

True statement. The center position will not win you a title. It's akin to asking why the best tight end in football didn't win you a super bowl. It's a great asset, it's a great thing to draft, but if you don't have solid starting ball-handers, you're totally fucked.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Nebu on June 25, 2010, 09:41:43 PM
I'd argue that a big man is more like an offensive line in football.  Sure, a great QB (PG or 1 in basketball) can get you wins, but he can do a hell of a lot more for your team with a good offensive line (basketball: big man or 5).  Kobe would have NEVER won this year without Gasol. 


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 25, 2010, 10:05:23 PM
I'd argue that a big man is more like an offensive line in football.  Sure, a great QB (PG or 1 in basketball) can get you wins, but he can do a hell of a lot more for your team with a good offensive line (basketball: big man or 5).  Kobe would have NEVER won this year without Gasol.  

And the counter is that a Gasol is worthless without a Kobe. Would anybody consider him a great player without the exposure he's received from winning with the Lakers? The main force comes from the people who have the ball in their hands the most. That's why QB's make the difference in football, pitchers in baseball, and guards in basketball.

I'm not discounting the total ability of a team to win in a sport, but you build from those points outward.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on July 04, 2010, 09:11:41 AM
It's looking like the Spurs are looking to move Tony Parker, and possibly to the Knicks.  That trade doesn't sound good for either team.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on July 04, 2010, 09:21:55 AM
This off season is getting retarded. 80 million for Rudy Gay? 100+ for Amare?  39 million for John Salmons?  Overpay much?


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on July 04, 2010, 01:11:12 PM
No kidding. 

Can you imagine what Amare would be worth if he had every played a second of defense?


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on July 04, 2010, 03:04:15 PM
Amare without an injury and with defence would probably be on course for the HOF. Joe Johnson is supposed to get an unbelievable extension as well. Why do these GMs have jobs?  :uhrr: A lot of these contracts are being given to older players as well. I'd be better if they were front-loaded, but that's pretty damn rare.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on July 04, 2010, 03:41:48 PM
120 million for Joe Johnson.  Unbelievable.  Enjoy your star who can't create his own shot.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on July 04, 2010, 09:29:31 PM
And 7 million per year for Amir Johnson :uhrr:


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 05, 2010, 09:50:32 AM
120 million for Joe Johnson.  Unbelievable.  Enjoy your star who can't create his own shot.

The Hawks ownership has no idea what it takes to win in the playoffs. You need a leader, and Atlanta hasn't had one. They just paid $120M for what will be the nail in the coffin for the Hawks owners. They will sell this team before they win in the second round.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on July 07, 2010, 02:38:20 PM
Bosh with Wade in Miami.

Boozer in Chicago.

Lebron doing some ridiculous announcement show (although raising cash for a good cause in the process), which means he's likely staying in Cleveland.  So.. uhh, who's left to join him?  Seems like he's going to end up on the one of the most talent poor teams in the conference.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: caladein on July 07, 2010, 04:40:04 PM
If Boozer's going to Chicago, there's really no one left on the table that they could even overpay for, much less get.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on July 07, 2010, 05:11:30 PM
Lebron would be silly stupid to spurn the Heat if the money is equal.  Well, if he wants to win he would be silly stupid.  If he wants to be the big fish in a small pond and be the NBA version of Ken Griffey, Jr., I guess he could do any of a number of things.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Trippy on July 07, 2010, 06:38:21 PM
Lebron would be silly stupid to spurn the Heat if the money is equal.  Well, if he wants to win he would be silly stupid.  If he wants to be the big fish in a small pond and be the NBA version of Ken Griffey, Jr., I guess he could do any of a number of things.
Money can't be equal cause Wade and Bosh are signing with Miami. He would have to be willing to take less than what he can get at Cleveland (the max) for a better chance to win a championship.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on July 07, 2010, 08:13:08 PM
Not if Miamuh can pull off an interesting trade.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Malakili on July 07, 2010, 08:18:39 PM
Lebron would be silly stupid to spurn the Heat if the money is equal.  Well, if he wants to win he would be silly stupid.  If he wants to be the big fish in a small pond and be the NBA version of Ken Griffey, Jr., I guess he could do any of a number of things.
Money can't be equal cause Wade and Bosh are signing with Miami. He would have to be willing to take less than what he can get at Cleveland (the max) for a better chance to win a championship.


Well, he'd have to take less to go anywhere but cleveland, though the idea is if he went somewhere like New York or Chicago the endorsement deals would more than make up for it.  Miami isn't exactly a big basketball town though, not compared to some of the others in the running.  I've been saying since the beginning I think he'll stay in Cleveland just because I don't think any of the other teams he would go to are really going to be any better.  Miami is definitely better now though, hypotheticlaly, so I dunno.  Of course, if they signed THREE max players, the rest of their team would be made up of anyone they can scrounge together (which might actually be a fair amount, if people are willing to play for league minimum to win).

Still, I could do without the whole charade, the only reason this is such a big deal is because ESPN hasn't been able to shut up about it for the last year, let along the last month.   I really do like sports, but sometimes ESPN makes me want to claw my eyes out of my head.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: ghost on July 08, 2010, 06:04:52 AM
Looking like Miamuh (http://nba.fanhouse.com/2010/07/08/lebron-james-miami-dwyane-wade-chris-bosh/?ncid=txtlnkusspor00000002&hpt=C2)


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 08, 2010, 07:53:56 AM
If Lebron goes to Miami, I want Shaq in Atlanta. Just so we'll have something to chuckle about as we get our asses kicked roundly.


Title: Re: NBA Draft 2010
Post by: Rasix on July 08, 2010, 07:57:36 AM
It'll be interesting seeing those 3, Mario Chalmers and a bunch of guys signing for the league minimum.  I didn't think Lebron's ego would accomodate this.  Miami won't be "his team".

Hopefully Wade can stay healthy, which hasn't been a given for him.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 08, 2010, 10:13:12 AM
I think Lebron's ego can deal with that.  He's a fairly unselfish player and I think his overall popularity won't be eclipsed by the other two guys.

I changed the name of the thread to more accurately represent the direction we are taking it.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on July 08, 2010, 10:16:57 AM
http://deadspin.com/5581889/lebron-james-is-a-cocksucker?skyline=true&s=i

I agree wholeheartedly...and I hate the NBA.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 08, 2010, 12:47:46 PM
Linas Kleiza........really? (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5364021)

I think Canada should have their last remaining NBA franchise revoked for this contract.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Triforcer on July 08, 2010, 06:47:40 PM
What a spoiled little narcissist.  If you are going to abandon your home, don't do it on national TV and then say you expect Cleveland fans to be unprofessional when you come back.  Go fuck yourself in Miami, fucker. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on July 08, 2010, 06:55:08 PM
I live in Cleveland, was born and raised here, and I don't hold it against him for leaving. He tried to make it work for 7 years, took us to the finals (which we've never been) but we just didn't get over the hump. I think more than anything he just wanted to play with his friends. If I was to attend the Miami Vs Cleveland game I wouldn't boo him.

I think it'll be interesting to see; who exactly is the top scorer on that team? Who takes the game-winning shot?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Triforcer on July 08, 2010, 07:00:17 PM
I don't mind the basic fact that he left.  The manner in which he did it could have been much more professional and respectful toward Cleveland.  He doesn't owe them staying forever, he DOES owe them a bit of grace.  It wouldn't have made it hurt less now, but it would have helped later.  He pissed that opportunity away.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on July 08, 2010, 07:08:22 PM
As someone who never even been to Cleveland, I don't begrudge him for leaving.  I do hope the Miami faceplants because blowing all your money on three guys with nearly nothing left over is insane.

I don't even think Miami is going to be the best team in East unless they pull some serious miracles out at the minimum.  Chicago's about as good right now and has a maximum contract's worth of cash to spend :awesome_for_real:.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 08, 2010, 07:10:50 PM
Miami is going to destroy everyone they play.   :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on July 08, 2010, 07:33:35 PM
I live in Cleveland, was born and raised here, and I don't hold it against him for leaving. He tried to make it work for 7 years, took us to the finals (which we've never been) but we just didn't get over the hump. I think more than anything he just wanted to play with his friends. If I was to attend the Miami Vs Cleveland game I wouldn't boo him.

I think it'll be interesting to see; who exactly is the top scorer on that team? Who takes the game-winning shot?

Hey there neighbor. Though I haven't been back to live in Cleveland since 1998, I was born and raised around there. I don't give two shits about the NBA so I am just glad this "oh look at me" shit is done. However, that said, I do think he just did his best Art Modell impersonation.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 08, 2010, 07:49:54 PM
Well, he did at least take less money to go to the team he has the best chance of winning with.  Most people expected him  to follow the money or stay home.  You have to give him some credit for sticking his neck out a bit and taking less money.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Nebu on July 08, 2010, 08:13:30 PM
The guy is one of the two best people in the world at what he does.  He used the opportunity to raise money for charity while simultaneously getting out of Cleveland.  Win-Win in my book. 

I think all the LeBron hate is nothing but veiled jealousy.  I don't think 99.999% of the world could even comprehend the daily pressure that guy has to live with... and he's been handling it pretty damn well since he was about 15.  All the haters can fuck off.  The guy is great and has earned the ability to do what he wants and use the stupid media to his advantage any way that he can.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on July 08, 2010, 09:43:20 PM
Do Cleveland fans not understand the concept of "free agent"?  It's not like he did anything remotely as bad as Boozer did to you in '03.

Ohh, and 80 million for David Lee.   :awesome_for_real:

edit: I just find it really hard to blame Lebron for leaving.  Sure the way he did it was nauseating but so what? Blame ESPN for going along with it.  The state of Ohio was going to be pissed whether he had a week long reality show or a simple line on a Twitter feed.

Cleveland never put a decent #2 option on that team.  Mo Williams?  Antwain Jamison (in decline)? A well past his prime Shaq (not to mention a giant body clogging the lane.. duuuurrrr)? Just surrounded him with a bunch of underachievers and over priced aging free agents.  That team got lucky winning him and then managed to be the biggest boobs in the front office for the next 7 years.  Only people worse at overpaying for crap have been the Knicks.

Dan Gilbert is a stooge.  Danny Ferry was a failure.  And poor Byron Scott will get fired after a season when this team makes last years Nets seem awesome.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Trippy on July 08, 2010, 11:23:03 PM
Bitter much? :awesome_for_real:

http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/news/gilbert_letter_100708.html


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on July 08, 2010, 11:49:49 PM
I don't think Lebron left in the right way, but it was fully in his rights. Cleveland was basically the opposite of how Miami is going to be, it was full of some (lots?) very good roleplayers, but few players who were dynamic enough to get involved in the offence (what offence?). Cleveland was one of the worst teams to watch in the nba for a long time (beautiful D though).

I predict the 1-3 Wade-Lebron pick and roll being both the most deadly and the only play the Heat run  :awesome_for_real:. My initial guess is considering Bosh's range he's going to get sidelined offensively pretty quickly and pick up the kick-outs from Bron and Wade.

When was the last time any team had such heavy talent in a few of it's positions?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 09, 2010, 07:23:01 AM
Good on Lebron for getting out and taking a small paycut in order to have a chance at winning. I'd rather he want to be competetive than simply take a huge paychex as the face of Losertown, USA. Shame on Lebron for breaking up with his team on national TV, and making a reality show out of it. That was a dick move, only slightly to be eclipsed by the dick move of the Cleveland owner whining like a petulant child.

I hope he wins down in Miami because I want him to get a ring. I don't want Lebron to be the Dan Marino of the NBA.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: MisterNoisy on July 09, 2010, 07:45:31 AM
Bitter much? :awesome_for_real:

http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/news/gilbert_letter_100708.html

The font choice seems strangely...  appropriate.  Whoever put the page together is having a bit of fun.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: HaemishM on July 09, 2010, 08:52:39 AM
Fuck ESPN for making such a grandstanding deal about this shit. Fuck the NBA for letting them, hell, for encouraging it. The NBA has been a league about all inflated egos and substance-less style for years now. I'm a Lebron fan, because I think he plays the game the right way and is a decent enough human being, especially in comparison to other luminaries in the NBA (Kobe the Rapist, Artest the Fan Beater, and the other coach chokers, gun thugs and shitbags). But Fuck Lebron for choosing to reveal your destination in such a showy way.

But most importantly - fuck the Cavs owner for that letter. You had YEARS with Lebron to give him a team worth a fuck. You gave him shit. Even when you got to the Finals, he had nothing around him to take the pressure off of him. You turned that franchise around with Lebron - he sold tickets, put asses in seats, sold jerseys and made you more money than you would have had if you had drafted anyone else that year. You had multiple chances to show him you gave a shit about him and about winning a championship and you EPIC FAILED. I watched the Finals against San Antonio. Your team got demolished by a superior team that played the most boring game of basketball I've ever seen. But they won because they put a good TEAM together out there on the floor, not one superstar surrounded by has-beens, also-rans and bench players. You can't win with a team of 4 sixth man's and Lebron. If you'd put half the dedication into building a decent team around the superstar, even using the Indy Colts' model of lots of cheap young guys surrounding the star that you replenish when their price goes up, you still could have won. You didn't, don't bitch and whinge now. Go cry on that pile of money you made off Lebron.

Lebron didn't go for the most money or the biggest stage (they happen to be one and the same) because the Knicks are a worse franchise than the Cavs and the Nets are almost as bad. I'm not sure he'll win in Miami, as Duane Wade seems about as durable as a china doll. But at least it ain't the Lakers.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 09, 2010, 09:14:30 AM
Quote
I hope he wins down in Miami because I want him to get a ring. I don't want Lebron to be the Dan Marino of the NBA.

I, on the other hand, hope he drowns in the storm surge of a hurricane big enough to encompass his ego. Which would probably destroy the earth, but them's the breaks. I am so utterly fucking sick of all the non-sports bullshit I see pass for sports news these days I can't even begin to express it. A one hour special? The fucking President has to fight tooth and nail to get 30 minutes of prime time for actual important things, not where Posse James is going to set up shop and bang groupies.

Fuck LeBron, fuck Miami, fuck David Stern, fuck the NBA, and fuck every drooling retard that breathlessly reported every time LeBron sneezed the past few weeks. What a crock of shit.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 09, 2010, 10:07:00 AM
Meh hating Lebron takes too much effort because the NBA is so meaningless. The regular season hardly matters, the playoffs have been dominated by San Antonio and the Lakers for the last 12 years, and the East as a whole has been a joke since the Bulls stopped being good in 1998.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on July 09, 2010, 10:18:58 AM
Fuck ESPN for making such a grandstanding deal about this shit. Fuck the NBA for letting them, hell, for encouraging it. The NBA has been a league about all inflated egos and substance-less style for years now. I'm a Lebron fan, because I think he plays the game the right way and is a decent enough human being, especially in comparison to other luminaries in the NBA (Kobe the Rapist, Artest the Fan Beater, and the other coach chokers, gun thugs and shitbags). But Fuck Lebron for choosing to reveal your destination in such a showy way.

But most importantly - fuck the Cavs owner for that letter. You had YEARS with Lebron to give him a team worth a fuck. You gave him shit. Even when you got to the Finals, he had nothing around him to take the pressure off of him. You turned that franchise around with Lebron - he sold tickets, put asses in seats, sold jerseys and made you more money than you would have had if you had drafted anyone else that year. You had multiple chances to show him you gave a shit about him and about winning a championship and you EPIC FAILED. I watched the Finals against San Antonio. Your team got demolished by a superior team that played the most boring game of basketball I've ever seen. But they won because they put a good TEAM together out there on the floor, not one superstar surrounded by has-beens, also-rans and bench players. You can't win with a team of 4 sixth man's and Lebron. If you'd put half the dedication into building a decent team around the superstar, even using the Indy Colts' model of lots of cheap young guys surrounding the star that you replenish when their price goes up, you still could have won. You didn't, don't bitch and whinge now. Go cry on that pile of money you made off Lebron.

Lebron didn't go for the most money or the biggest stage (they happen to be one and the same) because the Knicks are a worse franchise than the Cavs and the Nets are almost as bad. I'm not sure he'll win in Miami, as Duane Wade seems about as durable as a china doll. But at least it ain't the Lakers.

Well technically Gilbert did break cap on many occasions with bringing in players that Lebron had input into. Tied the organizations hands in a way and couldn't get in anyone else for fear that Lebron would bolt before their proposed contracts would be up (ah la Shaq-fu). Mo Williams was supposed to turn into something...he was on track and never developed into his projection. Took Chicago with Jordan 7 years to bring that city into the NBA spotlight, 7 years of being pistol whipped by Boston and Detroit. But hey, its like Ditka said (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/jeff_pearlman/05/28/ditka.loyalty/index.html): about football in 2010 and how nobody who plays the game and nobody who coaches the game and nobody who owns a team exercises even the slightest bit of honor. "It's all gone," he said. "Completely gone. Replaced by selfishness and greed." It boils down to essentially player colluding to "buy" a championship. Hell if that's all it takes, then why not?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Nevermore on July 09, 2010, 11:15:31 AM
Wow, that Gilbert guy sounds like a colossal dick.  Way to throw a temper tantrum there.  If I were James I'd have given him a giant middle finger, too.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on July 09, 2010, 11:33:19 AM
Meh hating Lebron takes too much effort because the NBA is so meaningless. The regular season hardly matters, the playoffs have been dominated by San Antonio and the Lakers for the last 12 years, and the East as a whole has been a joke since the Bulls stopped being good in 1998.

The playoffs last year where fucking amazing. Not liking Basketball is one thing, but the above statement is just wrong.

San Antonio didnt make it out of the second round this year, and didnt make it out of the first round last year. The celtics where a fantastic team the last 3 years. If you had made this post in 2007, it might hold water, but not today.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Trippy on July 09, 2010, 11:40:24 AM
Wow, that Gilbert guy sounds like a colossal dick.  Way to throw a temper tantrum there.  If I were James I'd have given him a giant middle finger, too.
I can't find the quote right now but Wade made a comment after seeing Gilbert's statement to the effect of "I'm glad my owner is Micky Arison I and understand better why LeBron didn't want to stay".


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 09, 2010, 11:42:59 AM
I like unstable people in positions of sports power.  It makes for a better show. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 09, 2010, 12:22:37 PM
Meh hating Lebron takes too much effort because the NBA is so meaningless. The regular season hardly matters, the playoffs have been dominated by San Antonio and the Lakers for the last 12 years, and the East as a whole has been a joke since the Bulls stopped being good in 1998.

The playoffs last year where fucking amazing. Not liking Basketball is one thing, but the above statement is just wrong.

San Antonio didnt make it out of the second round this year, and didnt make it out of the first round last year. The celtics where a fantastic team the last 3 years. If you had made this post in 2007, it might hold water, but not today.

Last year, the 5-8 seeds in the East wouldn't have made the playoffs in the West. The year before that, 4-8 wouldn't have made it the West. Face it, the East has a couple of teams that are great, and the rest are pretty substandard.

The Celtics were great over the last three years. The Kings were better, though. Celtics won once, Kings once twice, and the Kings were in all three finals post-2007. Before that, it was even worse. The Lakers/Spurs combined for 9 NBA titles in 12 years, if the Lakers had won two more finals they were in, it would have been 11.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 09, 2010, 12:48:33 PM
Hey, a team from the East has made the finals every year, so they can't be that bad  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: El Gallo on July 11, 2010, 06:09:08 AM
The NFL has been irrelevant for almost its entire post-merger history!  1969-1981 (AFC wins 11 of 13), 1982-1997 (NFC wins 15 of 16), 1998-2007 (AFC wins 8 of 10).    :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on July 11, 2010, 06:18:14 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5372266

There you have it. Its nothing more than about slavery.

:facepalm:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on July 11, 2010, 07:07:29 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5372266

There you have it. Its nothing more than about slavery.

:facepalm:

 :uhrr:



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 11, 2010, 07:34:47 PM
Glad Jesse could clear that up for us   :pedobear:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 11, 2010, 08:27:49 PM
God I love Jesse and his shenanigans.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Trippy on July 11, 2010, 08:35:08 PM
Jackson's ramblings make as much sense as Gilbert's rantings.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on July 12, 2010, 11:20:57 AM
Fuck ESPN for making such a grandstanding deal about this shit.

The thing that gets me about this is their online site is full of columns about how stupid and selfish and over the top it all was, and NOT ONE of them, as far as I saw, assigns ESPN itself any of the blame for it.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: HaemishM on July 12, 2010, 11:23:50 AM
ESPN treated it just like the fucking Favre thing. "Oh we're so sick of talking about it! Here's 16 more hours of coverage!"

Fuck right off.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 12, 2010, 11:36:36 AM
ESPN treated it just like the fucking Favre thing. "Oh we're so sick of talking about it! Here's 16 more hours of coverage!"

Fuck right off.

I love it when the talking heads on sports shows talk about how disgusted they are with the way the media is handling things.  :facepalm:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on July 12, 2010, 11:43:11 AM
ESPN treated it just like the fucking Favre thing. "Oh we're so sick of talking about it! Here's 16 more hours of coverage!"

Fuck right off.

I love it when the talking heads on sports shows talk about how disgusted they are with the way the media is handling things.  :facepalm:

Especially when their own network is the one that broadcast the special.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on July 12, 2010, 11:59:10 AM
ESPN treated it just like the fucking Favre thing. "Oh we're so sick of talking about it! Here's 16 more hours of coverage!"

Fuck right off.

I love it when the talking heads on sports shows talk about how disgusted they are with the way the media is handling things.  :facepalm:

Especially when their own network is the one that broadcast the special.

Yeah, it was ridiculous.   But this is what happens when you have three television stations, and a radio station devoted to cover just sports 24 hours a day.  There just isn't that much to talk about, so when something even remotely important happens they trump it up all over every single one of their shows as if its the end all and be all.  If you've ever spent any time watching like an entire day of ESPN (which I know is kind of ridiculous but bear with me here), the narrative they have running through the day is ridiculous.  Each show brings up the same talking points, in the same order of importance, interviews the same people, and so forth.

Basically they have so little to talk about that they are most often reduced to doing commentary ON THE COMMENTARY of other people.  :argh:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 12, 2010, 12:01:56 PM
Fuck, you don't even have to watch it all day. Just watch "Around the Horn" and then immediately after that watch "PTI."

They bring up the exact same shit right in a row. The only difference is that on PTI they usually do an interview.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 12, 2010, 01:33:48 PM
Over half and maybe even 3/4 of ESPN's coverage, in general, is of the NFL.  Which I guess it should be, considering the popularity of the sport. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 12, 2010, 01:38:59 PM
Over half and maybe even 3/4 of ESPN's coverage, in general, is of the NFL.  Which I guess it should be, considering the popularity of the sport. 

During the season, absolutely. In off-season, it's usually only 40% tops, and that includes college football. Right now the majority of the time is going to baseball highlights, NBA free agency, and off the field craziness.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on July 12, 2010, 01:42:22 PM
Eh, it generally takes half of Sports Center just to go through the baseball highlights. Although after the highlights, there usually isn't much interesting to say on that subject.  This part of the year is generally pretty boring for sports related programming. The worst though is the part of the year when all that's left is NBA. SNOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE.  Nothing interesting happens during the NBA season.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 12, 2010, 01:46:41 PM
Nothing interesting happens during the NBA season.

Oh man, I totally agree. The worst month is February after the Super Bowl is over. It's too early for the March Madness, the NFL is over, and hockey isn't even close to the playoffs yet. ESPN is practically unwatchable at that point. All you get are horrible dunk highlights and endless shows talking about tournament bubble teams.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on July 12, 2010, 02:33:16 PM
February's not so bad.  Start of spring training, NBA and NHL All-Star Games, maybe a Winter Olympics.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 12, 2010, 02:38:27 PM
Three of those are meaningless exhibition games and one only happens every four years.

Tis a cruel, cruel month indeed.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 12, 2010, 05:33:05 PM
To me, March Madness is when basketball is supposed to end.  And then the NBA keeps going and going and going.  Now they are getting ready for training camp.


Not to bring this into the NFL, but I think the fact that every game is important really lends a lot to the allure of the game.  I really hope they don't add more season games. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: El Gallo on July 12, 2010, 08:19:20 PM
The horrible part of the sports season starts after the NBA and Stanley Cup finals are over: when there's nothing but baseball.  The only hope for entertainment is the dream that Bob Costas or George Will will actually die on screen from outrage over Barry Bonds raping Betsy Ross's corpse.

The World Cup delayed this annual dark age for a month this year, for which I am grateful every four years.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 12, 2010, 08:23:29 PM
Every once in a while we get the summer olympics, too. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 13, 2010, 07:20:07 AM
I used to hate baseball for taking over the entire summer, but then hockey went on strike for the entire year and I had absolutely nothing to watch after football ended. I spent the entire summer just watching baseball and going to games. Mind you, this was still the latter part of the steroid era so balls were flying out of the park at that point.

Still, I never went back to hockey. I had moved to a town with a great baseball team and a shitty hockey team. The beauty of baseball was that it was on every night, and you didn't have to sit there and actively watch every single play to keep track of the game. It was nice background to my other gaming. When there were runners on, I could pause and watch baseball. It works perfectly for my playstyle.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on July 16, 2010, 08:28:27 AM
Apparently JJ Redick is worth 19 million dollars.

Wot the fuck. (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5385470)

I suppose my grandmother was right:  a fool and his money really are soon parted.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on July 16, 2010, 08:44:33 AM
I was going to say that sounds like a good deal for a 5 year contract...  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 16, 2010, 09:05:31 AM
The bad economy obviously didn't hit NBA franchises. Good grief.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 16, 2010, 09:38:14 AM
The NBA financial model has been utterly and completely broken for decades. The league would be in much better shape if David Stern got hit by a bus tomorrow.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on July 16, 2010, 10:29:38 AM
The NBA financial model has been utterly and completely broken for decades. The league would be in much better shape if David Stern got hit by a bus tomorrow.

Sports would be better if Bud Selig was holding his hand.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 16, 2010, 10:34:39 AM
And Gary Bettman. And Sepp Blatter. And probably Don Garber. Goddell gets a pass for now  :grin:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 22, 2010, 06:37:50 AM
Well, the preseason is going strong and it looks like Lebron hasn't really shed the target he had on his back.  It is unfortunate (or fortunate, depending on you point of view) that the Heat's season will probably depend upon the health of Wade.  Without him, they are as weak or weaker than the Cavaliers. 

Heat versus Hawks box score (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=301021001)


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on October 22, 2010, 08:06:37 AM
Fans in Atlanta booed the shit out of Lebron. Also, that's the most people we've had at a preseason game in like...ever.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 22, 2010, 08:23:56 AM
Fans in Atlanta booed the shit out of Lebron. Also, that's the most people we've had at a preseason game in like...ever.
It was probably one of the most attended preseason games ever for any team.  I'm not sure Lebron understands how big of a target he pInted on his back with the "decision" special.  I'm going with e Lakers to win again.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 26, 2010, 12:13:34 PM
The season tips off tonight.  There are three good games, including Heat-Celtics, Blazers-Suns and Lakers-Rockets.

I'm actually a bit excited to see how the Heat do. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on October 26, 2010, 12:25:16 PM
Tough to ignore Heat-Celtics even if you don't like the NBA. It's a Tuesday. I'll probably check it out while flipping back and forth between the Boise State trainwreck football game against LA Tech.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 26, 2010, 12:29:24 PM
The NBA has improved by leaps and bounds over the 98-2005 time frame after Jordan left.  Kobe is absolutely turning into a top five player ever and the Heat trio will be a lot of fun to watch.  It should be a good season.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on October 26, 2010, 12:32:25 PM
The NBA has improved by leaps and bounds over the 98-2005 time frame after Jordan left.  Kobe is absolutely turning into a top five player ever and the Heat trio will be a lot of fun to watch.  It should be a good season.

It should be interesting with the Miami Heat taking over the role of the evil empire. That storyline will continue coast to coast where ever they travel. Unless they don't work well as a team and suck.

I'd say this season rides entirely on how well Miami plays. Nobody really wants to watch Kobe get ANOTHER ring.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 26, 2010, 12:40:15 PM
It should be interesting with the Miami Heat taking over the role of the evil empire

I guess I don't understand all the "hate Lebron" vibes going around.  He is, for all intents and purposes, a decent enough fellow.  He took less money to go to a better team and a cooler city.  He doesn't kill dogs or beat his kids or rape women or get caught snorting coke off a hooker's ass while trying to drive.  And he actually seems to be a bit witty and intelligent.  Sure he has a huge ego, but who doesn't in the NBA? 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on October 26, 2010, 12:49:25 PM
He broke some African-American unspoken rule about sticking with his community or something. It doesn't really make any sense, and frankly it doesn't have to. He was going to make Cleveland something awesome, and now it's back to being just Cleveland. So, they hate him for it. America hates him for the fact he went on national television in his own primetime special to tell his hometown to fuck off.

In reality, he's just immature, but that comes off as him being a total dick. People love to hate something, and he's it.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 26, 2010, 12:52:12 PM
But they love assholes like Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan and Michael Vick.  I'm a huge Lebron fan.  I hope he does great. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on October 26, 2010, 12:54:36 PM
But they love assholes like Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan and Michael Vick.  I'm a huge Lebron fan.  I hope he does great. 

Winner, Winner, went to prison.

I won't go into how the community feels about these things (because I have no clue), but they all seem to respond more to those attributes than giving the finger to your hometown.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on October 26, 2010, 02:27:38 PM
It is the white folks who mostly hate LeBron, not black. I happened to catch some ESPN polling stuff this last weekend while hunting for Giants highlights at the hotel and his 'favorability' is at like 30% with white people and 65% with black.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 26, 2010, 06:35:25 PM
It is the white folks who mostly hate LeBron, not black. I happened to catch some ESPN polling stuff this last weekend while hunting for Giants highlights at the hotel and his 'favorability' is at like 30% with white people and 65% with black.



Much of the anti-NBA angst is racially motivated.  And the NFL, which has a much much higher rate of arrests and other problems, is the "white mans sport". 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Margalis on October 27, 2010, 01:45:15 AM
It is the white folks who mostly hate LeBron, not black.

Of course conversely you could spin it as it's black folks who mostly like LeBron.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on October 27, 2010, 12:40:54 PM
Of course. But the context of the conversation was people hating LeBron, not people loving him.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on October 27, 2010, 12:54:53 PM
I don't think it's spin.  It irritated me that Lebron brought up the race thing, but he was right.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 27, 2010, 01:42:05 PM
I doubt it is racially motivated, at least for most people (there are always fuckheads and Southerners). I was indifferent to LeBron until this past summer. Now I loathe him. I used to love Brett Favre (4 or 5 years ago). Now I want to see him die in a car fire. Doesn't mean I hate black people or white people; it means I hate self-indulgent assholes.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Margalis on October 30, 2010, 09:16:15 PM
There is absolutely nothing likable about LeBron. Period. He has talent. He's also an ultra-douche. Keep in mind I like Iverson. It isn't a race thing, it's an asshole thing.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on November 05, 2010, 07:02:55 AM
Isaiah likes his draft record, apparently.  Insanity is a wonderful, wonderful thing. 

Quote
"When I look at my GM/executive record, if I'm evaluated on that, then whoever's after Donnie, if you're not talking about some of the top people in the game, I'll put my draft evaluation record up against anyone's."

This nimrod actually thinks he's got a shot at being rehired by the Knicks (http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/columns/story?columnist=oconnor_ian&id=5766026).


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on November 05, 2010, 05:37:42 PM
To be fair, the Knicks are pretty stupid.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: FatuousTwat on November 07, 2010, 02:45:11 PM
I'm glad the Blazers are doing so well, but I can already see them falling into their standard pattern;

Win a few games, get overconfident and start fucking up, over-extend while trying to fight their way back and suffer a ton of injuries.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on November 07, 2010, 05:15:19 PM
The Atlanta Hawks and the Atlanta Falcons are leading their conferences. I think this may be the end times.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: trias_e on November 09, 2010, 07:49:41 PM
Did anyone watch the Utah-Miami game?  Un-fucking-believable.  Paul Millsap basically turned on God mode, Lebron did basically nothing near the end.  Life is good if you're a Jazz fan.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on November 10, 2010, 04:59:55 AM
Milsap really is the second coming of the Mailman, isn't he?  Wow. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on November 10, 2010, 06:35:45 AM
We'll see how Utah fares against Orlando tonight.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: trias_e on November 10, 2010, 09:04:55 AM
2nd end of a back to back, on the road against a good team, after a crazy emotional OT game?

If it's not a loss, I'll be absolutely shocked.  Maybe if Milsap goes for 46 again though  :grin:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on November 12, 2010, 07:01:04 AM
John Wall is going to be a fucking god once everything is said and done.  And Rajon Rondo is going to be just behind him in godliness. 

Wall's stat line-  19 ppg  10 apg  3.2 steals pg  4.3 rpg
Rondo's stat line-  11 ppg  15 apg  3 steals pg  5 rpg

I can't wait to see these guys play against each other.  It's going to be epic.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on November 12, 2010, 07:35:03 AM
Home team here v. the Jazz tonight. I'm not sure how it will go off the drubbing that the Bucks put on the Hawks.  :ye_gods:

I'm probably taking the Jazz and the +4.5 unless something shifts.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on November 12, 2010, 09:36:33 AM
It's nice to see that whole experiment down in Miami working so nicely  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on November 12, 2010, 09:40:01 AM
I've never been a huge fan of Bosh and Wade is injury prone and overrated from his title run his rookie year.  Overall Wade just isn't as good as people like to prop him up to be.  They greatly overpaid for him when they could have gotten two serviceable bigs to actually rebound and come out better off.  I think James and Wade will eventually pull it together, but it's going to take a while.  I suspect a #4-5 seed in the playoffs. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on November 12, 2010, 10:01:55 AM
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/40252/hella-dunks-o.gif)

I could watch this all day, and I pretty much hate the Cs.

E: Changed image link.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on November 12, 2010, 10:16:45 AM
As a Lakers fan, it is pretty much required that I hate the Celtics, but I can appreciate them as a team and what they are able to do. Rondo can be amazing and Pierce has the potential to explode and is an all around great player.

As to Lebron, personally I feel he is overrated, it seems that he has a tendency to totally disappear in clutch moments.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on November 15, 2010, 10:49:16 AM
I don't know how he's doing this year, but last year he was the best "clutch" performer in the NBA by a wide margin:

http://www.82games.com/0910/CSORT11.HTM


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on November 15, 2010, 12:19:03 PM
I don't know how he's doing this year, but last year he was the best "clutch" performer in the NBA by a wide margin:

http://www.82games.com/0910/CSORT11.HTM

Talk about missing the point by the overuse of meaningless statistics.  The knock on Lebron is that he cannot pull his team (or arguably himself) through adversity during huge playoff games.  The only stat you need to support it can be measured by counting the number of rings on his fingers, or number of finals appearances.  Guys like MJ or Kobe (Bird, Magic, etc.)...they WILL their way through.  Lebron quits.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on November 15, 2010, 12:33:20 PM
Let's be fair. Kobe and Lebron can both put up 40 a game in the playoffs. They weren't the difference in why the Lakers won and the Cavs lost. The difference is that the Lakers could spread the ball around to other people if Kobe went cold early on. It wasn't all on him. They had the much better team.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on November 15, 2010, 02:59:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1Px-jPm_TU

Those last few games against the Magic, I think he quit, but prior to that he always took the team as far as the team could go given who was on the roster. That Cavs finals team is possibly the worst finals team of the last few decades.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on November 15, 2010, 03:40:10 PM
Let's be fair. Kobe and Lebron can both put up 40 a game in the playoffs. They weren't the difference in why the Lakers won and the Cavs lost. The difference is that the Lakers could spread the ball around to other people if Kobe went cold early on. It wasn't all on him. They had the much better team.

And Phil really is a hell of a coach. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on November 15, 2010, 07:09:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1Px-jPm_TU

Those last few games against the Magic, I think he quit,

Against Boston too, watching that last game it was just so blatant he was not interested i don't know how anyone could think he was going to stay in cleveland.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on November 30, 2010, 06:40:11 PM
Everyone needs to read this article about King James  the Bully (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=Ao0Bj8fJo.7r2znjQLOn67m8vLYF?slug=aw-lebronspoelstra112910). 

What a turd.  Some of the shit he does sounds like Randy Moss type tomfoolery. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on December 23, 2010, 08:14:43 AM
So the Bobcats fired Larry Brown and replaced him with Paul Silas.  When would you ever, ever think that Paul Fucking Silas is a good choice, even as an interim coach? 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on December 23, 2010, 08:29:52 AM
So the Bobcats fired Larry Brown and replaced him with Paul Silas.  When would you ever, ever think that Paul Fucking Silas is a good choice, even as an interim coach?  

It shows how ridiculously uneven the NBA is right now. You have 8 teams that are functional, have legitimate shots at a conference title, and have the winning mentality not to check out during the regular season. Then, you have 22 other teams.

Just look at the standings. Boston has lost 4 games and has a 7 game lead. That division is done in December. The Lakers are the same, 7 games up, and nobody else has a chance.

Right now unless you are either Boston, Atlanta, Miami, Orlando, Lakers, Spurs, Mavs, or Chicago, or you have zero shot at making it to the Finals. Eight more teams will get in, but I don't think anybody believe they are functional, and the Bobcats won't even make the playoffs.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on December 23, 2010, 08:46:08 AM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.  The talent pool is now so watered down due to the massive over expansion of the leagues that the "small market" will very rarely have a chance to compete.  We haven't really seen it in the NBA too much but with the Lakers, Miami, Celtics and Knicks looking to horde talent it's starting to become baseball. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on January 11, 2011, 09:55:37 AM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.  The talent pool is now so watered down due to the massive over expansion of the leagues that the "small market" will very rarely have a chance to compete.  We haven't really seen it in the NBA too much but with the Lakers, Miami, Celtics and Knicks looking to horde talent it's starting to become baseball. 

Yeah, I'd much prefer smaller leagues across the board with fewer but higher quality games.  There just aren't enough good players to fill these leagues.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 11, 2011, 10:00:19 AM
Turns out I agree with Lebron about contraction.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 11, 2011, 10:12:57 AM
If the Buttnuggets can end up pulling off this Carmelo Anthony trade it will be huge for the Nets.  They might even be able to make the playoffs. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Hoax on January 11, 2011, 01:00:41 PM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.

The nfl would like a word with you, actually the nhl would too it has a host of problems but top heavy bullshit isn't exactly one of them. So that leaves you with half instead of all but yes we can all agree with Lebron that the nba regular season would be less boring if there were fewer bad teams.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 11, 2011, 01:47:13 PM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.  The talent pool is now so watered down due to the massive over expansion of the leagues that the "small market" will very rarely have a chance to compete.  We haven't really seen it in the NBA too much but with the Lakers, Miami, Celtics and Knicks looking to horde talent it's starting to become baseball.  

Baseball? The sport that has had 9 different teams win championships in the last 10 years? That baseball? Even in the 90s when the Yankees were really going, the NBA was more dynasty-ridden than baseball.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 11, 2011, 01:47:31 PM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.

The nfl would like a word with you, actually the nhl would too it has a host of problems but top heavy bullshit isn't exactly one of them. So that leaves you with half instead of all but yes we can all agree with Lebron that the nba regular season would be less boring if there were fewer bad teams.

I disagree about the NFL.  The number of terrible teams in the NFL is simply staggering.  Hell, a team with a losing record made the playoffs in football.  I really can't speak to the NHL, but if you say it's balanced then I guess it is.  

And let's talk about the absolutely shitty teams in baseball, many of which have no place being in MLB-  Baltimore, Kansas City, Seattle, Washington, Pittsburgh, Florida.......heck, take out three of those teams and you've improved the overall quality of play immensely. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 11, 2011, 01:54:30 PM
Well if we want to do that we should probably do it in the baseball thread, but seriously, go look at Wikipedia's list of champions for the various sports. The NBA is *by far* the worst offender in the 'same teams win every year' category, and that's despite the fact that they let a huge number of teams into the playoffs. Competitive balance has always been terrible in the NBA, always.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 11, 2011, 01:56:41 PM
If I were in charge I would axe every expansion team since 1980 in all sports.  I understand that there have been different teams win the title in baseball, but the same teams seem to be sucking ass every single year.  Some of those teams just need to go.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 11, 2011, 02:24:39 PM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.  The talent pool is now so watered down due to the massive over expansion of the leagues that the "small market" will very rarely have a chance to compete.  We haven't really seen it in the NBA too much but with the Lakers, Miami, Celtics and Knicks looking to horde talent it's starting to become baseball.  

Here's the last 30 years of championships for each league, and how many different teams have won, going back to 1980.

NBA - 8 teams
NHL - 14 teams
NFL - 15 teams
MLB - 19 teams

It's pretty much just basketball. The rest of the leagues have sent half if not more of their teams to a championship in that span of time.

EDIT: Oh, and of those 8 teams that won in the NBA, only the Lakers, Celtics, Spurs, Heat, and Bulls are currently relevant.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 11, 2011, 02:33:06 PM
It's not necessarily about the number of teams that have won the titles.  The bigger issue is that the same teams are completely shitty year after year, e.g. the Raiders and the Lions and the Pirates and the Royals and the Clippers.  Bleh. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 11, 2011, 03:13:15 PM
It's not necessarily about the number of teams that have won the titles.  The bigger issue is that the same teams are completely shitty year after year, e.g. the Raiders and the Lions and the Pirates and the Royals and the Clippers.  Bleh. 

All of those are as much or more about bad management as they are about anything else. And hell, the Raiders have been to the Super Bowl in the last decade.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 11, 2011, 04:29:11 PM
It's not necessarily about the number of teams that have won the titles.  The bigger issue is that the same teams are completely shitty year after year, e.g. the Raiders and the Lions and the Pirates and the Royals and the Clippers.  Bleh. 

Raiders, Pirates, and Royals have all won in the last 30 years.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on January 11, 2011, 05:04:28 PM
It's not necessarily about the number of teams that have won the titles.  The bigger issue is that the same teams are completely shitty year after year, e.g. the Raiders and the Lions and the Pirates and the Royals and the Clippers.  Bleh. 

Raiders, Pirates, and Royals have all won in the last 30 years.


It has less to do with what franchises suck and more to do with the fact that SOME teams seem REALLY bad every year.  Not just bad, but like, waste of time to watch bad.   If you moved the LA Lakers into LA Clippers uniforms and vice versa you might get a championship team in a new uniform, but the problem still exists.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Sjofn on January 11, 2011, 05:39:18 PM
But then all the teams, in this ideal scenario, would be posting around .500 records, and you'd be bitching none of the teams are any good.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on January 11, 2011, 06:15:21 PM
The Clippers are bad because Donald Sterling is... Donald Sterling. I don't think the nba is completely fair but it seems to me that generally speaking teams deserve what they get.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Fordel on January 11, 2011, 06:37:11 PM
All the pro leagues are devolving into this same top heavy bullshit.  The talent pool is now so watered down due to the massive over expansion of the leagues that the "small market" will very rarely have a chance to compete.  We haven't really seen it in the NBA too much but with the Lakers, Miami, Celtics and Knicks looking to horde talent it's starting to become baseball. 

Yeah, I'd much prefer smaller leagues across the board with fewer but higher quality games.  There just aren't enough good players to fill these leagues.


Small Leagues are horseshit and boring. I use the CFL and pre-expansion NHL as my examples. Fewer teams and you just end up with the same team winning for half a decade in a row. Edge of your seat entertainment there.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 11, 2011, 06:38:57 PM
I still say that if you trim 4-5 teams from each league things would be diverse enough to remain entertaining, yet it would bump the talent pool up significantly for the remaining teams. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 12, 2011, 12:30:40 AM
And fuck over a bunch of cities, and put a lot of people out of work.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 06:14:24 AM
And fuck over a bunch of cities, and put a lot of people out of work.  :why_so_serious:

Welcome to hell  :grin:

The economy sucks, eh?  And good job moving this over to politics. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 12, 2011, 11:26:53 AM
Seriously though, I think it is striking that the sport with the *least* amount of revenue management (Baseball only has the luxury tax, no salary cap, no real revenue sharing) actually has the best competitive balance, despite all the whining about the Yankees.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 11:47:22 AM
I think it's a mistake to call competitive balance good play.  Diluting the talent pool sucks the quality out no matter how you look at it.  A good example of this is NCAA basketball, which has suffered horribly in quality since the mass exodus of the early entry players to the pros even though there is a supposed "parity" that makes things better somehow.  To hell with that.  I want the big guys to have the best talent and put on the best show for me.  This is a little Colin Cowherd-ish of me, but when it comes to baseball I would much rather watch Yankees- Red Sox than any number of the other shitty teams out there.  I want the talent level to be high all around so the quality is better.  Seriously- in MLB take Kansas City, Florida, Pittsburgh, Arizona, Washington, Baltimore and Seattle and try to come up with an 18 man team that would be competitive.  You'd still have trouble truly competing with the Yankees, Phillies, Boston or other big market teams on a regular basis. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Sjofn on January 12, 2011, 12:12:42 PM
Are you going to ever make up your mind? TOP HEAVY BULLSHIT BAD ... NO WAIT, ONE TEAM WINNING THE CHAMPIONSHIP FOREVER GOOD

I am 100% certain if they shrunk the league so it's some sort of CFL hellhole where it is always, ALWAYS the Alouettes versus Whoever Didn't Choke in the finals, you wouldn't like it as much as you think you would.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 12:31:06 PM
Are you going to ever make up your mind? TOP HEAVY BULLSHIT BAD ... NO WAIT, ONE TEAM WINNING THE CHAMPIONSHIP FOREVER GOOD

I am 100% certain if they shrunk the league so it's some sort of CFL hellhole where it is always, ALWAYS the Alouettes versus Whoever Didn't Choke in the finals, you wouldn't like it as much as you think you would.

Let me clarify for you-  It's not about who wins the championships.  It's everything to do with the shit talent on the bottom third of the leagues' teams.  Shrink all leagues by the 4-6 teams that nobody cares about so that we can see real quality play.    I could care less if the same team wins the title 50% of the time or if it's a different team every year.  It really makes no difference.  I just want to get rid of the shite teams that are almost never competitive.  Seriously, the Pirates are probably the worst team ever fielded, with a close second by the Washington Wizards.  Who would care if they faded into oblivion and donated their starters to other teams to make them more competitive on the court?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 12, 2011, 01:14:02 PM
There's always going to be a worst team, and they're always going to look bad compared to the best team. All that would happen is we'd get even pickier.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 01:25:59 PM
All that would happen is we'd get even pickier.

Is that possible?    :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on January 12, 2011, 01:31:22 PM
I don't need like, 12 teams or something, but I bet you could cut out a solid 10 teams and it'd be fine.  I really don't need any more games like Lakers/Cavs was last night. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 01:42:29 PM
Getting this discussion a little bit more on target, I believe that the following NBA teams could be cut and it would significantly help the overall level of play by having a supplemental draft for the other lower tier NBA teams.

1.  Washington Wizards
2.  Toronto Raptors
3.  Minnesota Timberwolves
4.  Memhpis Grizzlies



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on January 12, 2011, 02:36:35 PM
Unfortunately that contradicts one of your earlier statements Ghost, some of those teams have very talented players. The problem isn't the talent pool, it's mismanagement, poor coaching, rebuilding and youth.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 03:54:47 PM
Unfortunately that contradicts one of your earlier statements Ghost, some of those teams have very talented players. The problem isn't the talent pool, it's mismanagement, poor coaching, rebuilding and youth.

Actually, most of those teams would have 2-3 players max that would get picked up by other teams.  And those players would take the place of other, less talented players on the teams that drafted them.  It's not contradictory at all. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Hoax on January 12, 2011, 03:55:16 PM
Seriously though, I think it is striking that the sport with the *least* amount of revenue management (Baseball only has the luxury tax, no salary cap, no real revenue sharing) actually has the best competitive balance, despite all the whining about the Yankees.

No it doesn't. Number of teams winning championships should not be the best competitive balance metric.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on January 12, 2011, 05:53:20 PM
Whilst I understand your point Ghost, I don't agree. Teams would risk themselves on quite a few of those players if they didn't have to deal with the salary cap and a roster limit. Especially with the way the nba draft is designed, there's a (supposedly) a lot of long-term benefit to developing your young talent and/or tanking.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 12, 2011, 05:57:20 PM
With the exception of the few divisions in baseball, almost of all them have two teams that compete for the title, one that's a dark horse who usually fades post-All-Star break, and one that's hopeless.

For example, Yankees and Sox compete, Tampa is the dark horse (who won this year), and Baltimore is hopeless.
Or another example, Atlanta and Philly compete, Mets are the dark horse, and Washington is hopeless.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 12, 2011, 06:18:40 PM
if they didn't have to deal with the salary cap and a roster limit.

But they do have to deal with the salary cap and roster limit. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on January 24, 2011, 01:02:39 PM
Getting this discussion a little bit more on target, I believe that the following NBA teams could be cut and it would significantly help the overall level of play by having a supplemental draft for the other lower tier NBA teams.

1.  Washington Wizards
2.  Toronto Raptors
3.  Minnesota Timberwolves
4.  Memhpis Grizzlies



Not the cavs? they are worse than all four of them, record not withstanding.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 24, 2011, 01:24:13 PM
Cutting Toronto's a given. They should only have a hockey team.
Cutting Minnesota is a given. That's a shitty market filled with honkies.
Memphis stays. They are a primarily black city with nothing else except a bad AAA hockey team. They can make it work.
Washington stays. That market is huge, and they can afford to support a team.

I'd also cut the Clippers. You don't need two LA teams. The Lakers dominate and the Clippers are a regular joke.
I'd cut the Nets. Same reason as the Clippers. You are dominated by a better team you can't compete with in that market.
I'd also dump Charlotte becase they are hopeless and in terrible towns nobody cares about.

Let Cleveland stay. They like suffering.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Hoax on January 24, 2011, 03:07:32 PM
I'd cut the Hawks, Bobcats, Hornets, Magic, Grizzlies and Hornets.



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 24, 2011, 03:45:02 PM
The Hawks and the Magic???  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on January 24, 2011, 05:05:20 PM
The Hawks and the Magic???  :ye_gods:

Yeah that seems a bit silly, hell Orlando just built the best arena in the league.  The Clippers have always been profitable no matter their failures on the court, you really can't argue with that.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 24, 2011, 06:37:16 PM
New Orleans was very close to getting downsized before they got CPIII. 

To switch topics a bit, here's a nice list of the NBA's worst players. (http://nba.fanhouse.com/2011/01/24/the-works-who-are-the-nbas-worst-players/) 

I find it interesting that Brian Scalabrine is still playing.  What is he, 100?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on January 28, 2011, 09:06:38 PM
Was curious so I looked up the bottom 5 teams by home attendance per game this year:

26   Hawks   14,172
27   Pacers   13,943
28   76ers           13,885   
29   Kings      13,292   
30   Nets          12,929

Not a lot of overlap with the suggestions in the thread (but hi2u Nets.)

I can't allow the Nets to be removed though, the antics of Russian Steinbrenner promise to be too entertaining.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 28, 2011, 09:19:50 PM
Was curious so I looked up the bottom 5 teams by home attendance per game this year:

26   Hawks   14,172
27   Pacers   13,943
28   76ers           13,885   
29   Kings      13,292   
30   Nets          12,929

Not a lot of overlap with the suggestions in the thread (but hi2u Nets.)

I can't allow the Nets to be removed though, the antics of Russian Steinbrenner promise to be too entertaining.

It is amazing that Toronto and Memphis aren't on this list.  It's probably better to look at last 5 years. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on January 28, 2011, 09:41:05 PM
http://espn.go.com/nba/attendance (http://espn.go.com/nba/attendance)

You're right about Memphis, but the Raptors are pretty middle-of-the-pack actually.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 28, 2011, 09:43:54 PM
They're a little low for middle of the pack, but it's still fucking amazing.  They're fucking awful. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on January 29, 2011, 02:24:37 AM
How are the Cavs #2 on that list? I live in Cleveland, I've been to a few Cavs games, but once LeBron left I lost any desire to go see them play. For good reason, the Cavs are horrible without him. If I remember right we were dead last in attendance the year before we got LeBron.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on January 29, 2011, 07:16:58 AM
I'm always embarrassed by Atlanta's unwillingness to show up for anything when a team is doing well. The Hawks are 4th in the East, and 2 games behind Miami for the division lead. And yet, they are 5th to last in attendence next to teams that have zero shot at making the playoffs.  :facepalm:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on January 29, 2011, 08:32:24 AM
I'm always embarrassed by Atlanta's unwillingness to show up for anything when a team is doing well. The Hawks are 4th in the East, and 2 games behind Miami for the division lead. And yet, they are 5th to last in attendence next to teams that have zero shot at making the playoffs.  :facepalm:

Not everywhere has the same sports culture.  Hell, the New York Knicks have had high attendence for the last decade and their team has been barely tolerable. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Sjofn on January 29, 2011, 01:45:28 PM
They're a little low for middle of the pack, but it's still fucking amazing.  They're fucking awful. 

People might go because the tickets are cheap and they can see the OTHER team?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Muffled on January 29, 2011, 09:12:53 PM
They're a little low for middle of the pack, but it's still fucking amazing.  They're fucking awful. 

People go because what the hell else is there to do in Toronto?  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on January 30, 2011, 02:04:33 PM
They're a little low for middle of the pack, but it's still fucking amazing.  They're fucking awful. 

People go because what the hell else is there to do in Toronto?  :why_so_serious:

I thought Toronto was actually fairly cosmopolitan. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Muffled on January 30, 2011, 05:22:16 PM
I don't know, I just like to give Canada shit.

They're so far away that I'm not skeered.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Fordel on January 30, 2011, 08:09:04 PM
They're a little low for middle of the pack, but it's still fucking amazing.  They're fucking awful. 

If being awful stopped Toronto fans from going to games, the Leafs would have folded decades ago.  :why_so_serious:



Seriously, go look at the earlier years on those seat charts, the Raptors are often in the Top 10, let alone middle of the pack. When ever I see a game on TV, all the seats are full, with red jerseys and people waving those sticks or towels or whatever they give them to try and spoil enemy free throws.

I think folks might be underestimating how large of a city Toronto actually is, or how many people live within easy travel distance of it, OR how stupidly loyal Toronto Sport Fans can actually be, for no logical reason that science can explain. The simple fact they aren't the god damn Leafs is enough for a lot of people to just latch onto them.  :why_so_serious:

Basketball is slowly gaining more and more traction in the city overall. The sport is significantly cheaper to play and follow then hockey and the city has a enormous immigrant population that doesn't have the 'hockey madness' that more established families seem to develop.




If you want a mystery to solve, figure out how the god damn Blue Jays are still in Toronto. The Raptors are doing fine, in terms of fan presence at least.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: trias_e on February 10, 2011, 12:27:55 PM
Jerry Sloan just fucking resigned.

As a Jazz fan for ~18 years now...wow.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 10, 2011, 12:29:51 PM
Quote
Two sources close to the situation told ESPN.com's Marc Stein that Sloan reacted angrily during Wednesday night's home loss when guard Deron Williams called his own play on the floor different from the play Sloan called from the sideline.

I suspect that Sloan figures he doesn't have to put up with that shit (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=6109031).  And I agree with him. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Fordel on February 10, 2011, 04:51:26 PM
I'm not very familiar with how basketball plays out, but I take it that players normally damn well better do whatever the coach calls out?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 10, 2011, 05:02:41 PM
With Jerry Sloan you had better do it that way.  He's a bit old school.  Some coaches will give the players more leeway than others.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 16, 2011, 08:30:50 AM
Are the Hornets on the chopping block (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=6125242)? 

I would think they would be a possibility for relocation far before contraction.  They have a good team.  To that point, I'm really surprised there isn't a team in San Diego.  Las Vegas could probably support a team, too, although the politics of that might be a bit off putting. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on February 16, 2011, 08:34:15 AM
Are the Hornets on the chopping block (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=6125242)? 

I would think they would be a possibility for relocation far before contraction.  They have a good team.  To that point, I'm really surprised there isn't a team in San Diego.  Las Vegas could probably support a team, too, although the politics of that might be a bit off putting. 

California can't possibly support another NBA team. There's already the Kings, Lakers, Clippers, and Warriors. Adding a fifth would just be crazy. Vegas would be interesting, but there's a reason that city can't do pro sports.

Honestly, I think the best call is probably St. Louis. Good facilities, good crowds, solid sports town that actively supports 3 pro teams with decent success.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 16, 2011, 09:09:03 AM
I could see Sacramento not being in Sacramento for long. 

Saint Louis is a good choice for relocation. 

Here are some others that I thought of that might be decent:

1.  Seattle
2.  Cincinnati
3.  Pittsburgh

That's it though.  I couldn't think of anywhere that could support a team other than those teams and St. Louis.  Any other options you can think of?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on February 16, 2011, 09:48:49 AM
That's it though.  I couldn't think of anywhere that could support a team other than those teams and St. Louis.  Any other options you can think of?

People like to toss out KC and Tampa, but I don't believe in either of those, especially Tampa.

I could see the Jacksonsville market doing ok. I would also say perhaps Birmingham, but there's a chance they might burn crosses at the stadium or just not notice it was there since it's not football.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 18, 2011, 06:50:04 AM
This whole Carmelo Anthony trade brouhaha is starting to make me laugh.  It's not like the guy is a franchise changer or anything.  Look what he's done for the Nuggets...... not much.  They've made it to the conference finals with him once-  2009.  He even looks like a doughboy, all soft and pudgy.  I hope he goes to the Nets and tanks.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 21, 2011, 10:54:23 AM
Tuned in to the ASG just long enough to see exactly how goddamned FUGLY the uniforms were. Jesus- I wore better looking stuff playing public rec center games in 5th grade. We just had T-shirts, but it looked better than that crap.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 21, 2011, 07:55:58 PM
Carmelo Anthony is now a Knick (http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/nba/news/story?id=6145912). 

Look to see CPIII end up there after his contract is up.  He's already said that he's probably not going to exercise his option in his contract.  Knicks also get Chauncey Billups.  Billups, Melo and Stoudemire will be a formidable lineup, but I still think they fall short of the Magic, Celtics, Lakers, Heat and Spurs. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 23, 2011, 10:04:12 AM
Now Deron Williams to the Nets.  This is getting very, very interesting.  The Nets will still suck, of course, but they'll be better.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on February 24, 2011, 06:06:19 AM
Hawks just unloaded a ton of people in a large trade. Bibby, Crawford, Evans, and a pick to the Wizards for Kirk Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong.

I know nothing about those two guys we got.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 24, 2011, 06:09:26 AM
Heinrich is a good little player.  He's a combo guard and what I would call a "glue guy" in that he doesn't make a lot of mistakes and makes people around him better.  He won't replace Bibby, for sure, and is a totally different player. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on February 24, 2011, 07:12:47 AM
Heinrich is uh, slightly more defensively sound than Bibby. For fun check out how badly Wade plays against him.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on February 24, 2011, 08:00:45 AM
Heinrich is a good little player.  He's a combo guard and what I would call a "glue guy" in that he doesn't make a lot of mistakes and makes people around him better.  He won't replace Bibby, for sure, and is a totally different player. 

Well the point was to replace an aging Bibby.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 24, 2011, 08:35:23 AM
Yeah, unfortunately he doesn't have the talent to do that.  Bibby is a much, much better passer and a little quicker, even with his age.  Heinrich is probably a better shooter at this point though.  One thing about Bibby that has always concerned me is attitude.  I think Heinrich will provide a much needed boost there.  


Here's an interesting rant from Mark Cuban (http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nba/news/story?id=6152463).  His gist is that the Hornets shouldn't be taking on additional salary (Carl Landry to the tune of $2,000,000) if they are already in trouble financially.  I tend to agree.  And it sounds like the Kings might end up in the same league-owned boat as the Hornets.  I really look for the NBA to downsize 1 or 2 teams, and these may be those teams. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on February 24, 2011, 08:37:02 PM
(http://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/filestorage/carmelo-anthony-second-round-playoffs-sports-ecards-someecards.png)


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on February 25, 2011, 12:08:50 AM
Over two thirds of your payroll locked in to two players who are probably overrated? The Knicks aren't going anywhere  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 25, 2011, 05:26:04 AM
Probably overrated? 

Stoudemire defends like a stop sign, not because he can't do it, but he won't.  Same with Anthony.  There is no probably in the conversation. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 28, 2011, 10:12:42 AM
Went to a Spurs game last night.  Manu Ginobili is a really, really solid basketball player.  He doesn't have the physique of a lot of these guys and yet he still takes it strong to the hole and passes like a point guard. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on February 28, 2011, 10:19:01 AM
I'm loving the Knicks move already, and it's all because of Chauncey Billups. That has to be the biggest "throw-in" player to a trade ever.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on February 28, 2011, 11:15:19 AM
Went to a Spurs game last night.  Manu Ginobili is a really, really solid basketball player.  He doesn't have the physique of a lot of these guys and yet he still takes it strong to the hole and passes like a point guard. 

Plus his well-honed flopping technique pays off well.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on February 28, 2011, 11:51:35 AM
He flops from time to time, no doubt.  I think that the reputation for flopping is a bit overdone after seeing them play in person though.  He takes it on the chin a fair amount.  I was pretty close to the floor and I could hear the solid thuds from him getting smacked around on several of the plays.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on February 28, 2011, 02:49:03 PM
I've always wondered how we'd view him if he had played 40 minutes a game throughout his career, injuries notwithstanding. He's a brilliant player.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Muffled on February 28, 2011, 07:29:11 PM
Dude didn't even start playing in the NBA until he was 25, if he'd come up through a U.S. university or in some other way been noticed earlier (and stayed relatively healthy) he'd have some amazing numbers.

I think getting him with a trash draft pick is probably the biggest reason the Spurs have had such a long run of championship contending teams.

That said, as a dutiful Mavericks fan I hate him with a fiery passion and hope he, and Parker and Duncan, fall off a cliff. :-P


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on March 01, 2011, 09:15:21 AM
Quote
He flops from time to time, no doubt.

Only when he is playing basketball. I am sure he manages to stay on his feet most other times. At least when he isn't on his knees.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on March 01, 2011, 08:09:11 PM
7 straight for the Mavs. They are quietly putting together a better record than the Lakers, and they are in second place in the division.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on March 02, 2011, 07:22:27 AM
Mavs are going to give the Spurs a run for the top spot, particularly with Parker being out for 2-3 weeks. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on March 03, 2011, 11:26:16 AM
Bibby to the Heat (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/truehoop/miamiheat/news/story?id=6177927)

This isn't too surprising, and if he plays up to his potential this could be the final piece for the Heat. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on March 03, 2011, 11:30:26 AM
I wish nothing but bad things for him and the Heat. He was notoriously inconsistent in Atlanta and actually had the balls to play the "disrespect" card when he got traded. Have fun in south beach, douchebag.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on March 03, 2011, 11:32:36 AM
I've never been a big fan of him either, but he'll probably do very well with the Heat.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on March 23, 2011, 06:50:27 AM
Rose and the Bulls are just ridiculous.

One of the all-time funny quotes from the Hawks announcers. "Derrick Rose pulls up and...(disgusted sound) hits at the buzzer. The Bulls have just put up 72 points on the Hawks in their own building in the first half. For the love of God!"

It was a Major League type moment.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on March 28, 2011, 06:50:49 AM
Donny Walsh-  Trades didn't fix the Knicks (http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/275112-knicks-gm-we-didnt-fix-flaws-with-trade?eref=fromSI).

I'm not sure why this surprises him.  When you trade for two "superstars" who refuse to play any defense at all this is what you get.  What a laugher. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on March 28, 2011, 07:25:41 AM
Not only that, but Denver seems no worse for losing Carmelo.

Also, I've not been much of an NBA fan over the past several years, but I've lately taken to watching the Bulls plays now and then.  Derrick Rose is one of the best players I've seen in a long time.  When he puts in the effort on defense, he's murder.  There's just nothing like a (relatively) small guy who consistently takes it to the hole and makes everyone else look fucking stupid.  He's Jordan-like in that respect.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on March 28, 2011, 07:30:51 AM
Donnie Walsh better expect to get fired after this season. I bet he's the kind of guy who believes that having a kid can fix a troubled marriage.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on March 28, 2011, 07:42:17 AM
Carmelo is just like Stevie Franchise and Stephon Starbury.  They were all about their points and being bigger than the team.  I've never liked him. 

Here's a list of the NBA All Defensive teams in the past (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_All-Defensive_Team). 

Notable names include MJ (9 times :oh_i_see:), Dwight Howard, Tim Duncan, Koby Bryant, Kevin Garnett, Chris Paul, LBJ, Rajon Rondo, CPIII,  Ron Artest, Jason Kidd and so on.  The best players in the league play defense.  The Knicks would have been better off with Gerald Wallace than fatty Carmelo.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on March 28, 2011, 07:43:59 AM
I think at this point Walsh wants to get fired.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 01, 2011, 05:41:36 PM
There is a several month back order on Melo jerseys and the knicks raised ticket prices by 40% for next year, and honestly no matter how bad they are doing now the team with two real superstars will be better off than the team with a bunch of good roleplayers eventually.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 01, 2011, 05:45:49 PM
There is a several month back order on Melo jerseys and the knicks raised ticket prices by 40% for next year, and honestly no matter how bad they are doing now the team with two real superstars will be better off than the team with a bunch of good roleplayers eventually.

Reminding us once again that New York fans are idiots.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Malakili on April 01, 2011, 05:57:50 PM
There is a several month back order on Melo jerseys and the knicks raised ticket prices by 40% for next year, and honestly no matter how bad they are doing now the team with two real superstars will be better off than the team with a bunch of good roleplayers eventually.

Reminding us once again that New York fans are idiots.

NY is a basketball town and they've got 2 big names to draw people to the arena.  They knicks have been irrelevant for years and still near the top in ticket sales. This is obviously going to blow the top off, even if the results aren't great.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 01, 2011, 06:05:19 PM
My point is that basketball teams are actually in the business of making money, like any other business.  Wins and losses matter some, but there is no way in hell getting Carmelo Anthony can be seen as a bad move, even if the knicks end up in the lottery for years to come.  Which they shouldn't, Miami sucked for stretches too and they've managed to turn into a scary team.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 01, 2011, 06:36:38 PM
My point is that basketball teams are actually in the business of making money, like any other business.  Wins and losses matter some, but there is no way in hell getting Carmelo Anthony can be seen as a bad move, even if the knicks end up in the lottery for years to come.  Which they shouldn't, Miami sucked for stretches too and they've managed to turn into a scary team.

So your point is that Melo puts asses in the seats, even if they lose?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 01, 2011, 06:51:14 PM
No, the asses were already there.  It does allow them to charge a ton more for the seats though.  And i don't think long term they will be worse off than Denver, specially after the new CBA makes it harder for stars to dictate where they want to play.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 01, 2011, 07:15:21 PM
I don't see how this doesn't make NY fans bigger idiots to pay more for the same crap.

It's flashier crap, I'll give them that.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 04, 2011, 11:40:33 AM
I hate this time of the season, there is like three teams left that give a shit about any remaining games.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on April 06, 2011, 09:08:40 AM
I am pulling for the Bulls in the postseason this year. Derrick Rose, while I don't think he should be the MVP (it should be Dwight Howard), is incredibly fun to watch. In the West I'm pulling for the Thunder, mostly because I really like watching Kevin Durant and Brian Westbrook.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2011, 10:51:20 AM
I am pulling for the Bulls in the postseason this year. Derrick Rose, while I don't think he should be the MVP (it should be Dwight Howard), is incredibly fun to watch. In the West I'm pulling for the Thunder, mostly because I really like watching Kevin Durant and Brian Westbrook.

The East is even more laughable than ever this season. Best case scenario, a team that's 5 games under .500 is going to make the playoffs. The 6 and 7 seeds could very well go .500 on the season.

Compare that to an 8 seed out of the West that's 10 games over .500, hmmmm.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on April 06, 2011, 05:27:37 PM
It is pathetic, I believe the thinking would be that eventually this will start evening out but I have to think maybe we should start restructuring which teams are in which conference? There's been a huge disparity for years, and it's really unfair to those 9 or 10 seeds out West that would easily make the playoffs in the East.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2011, 05:43:21 PM
It is pathetic, I believe the thinking would be that eventually this will start evening out but I have to think maybe we should start restructuring which teams are in which conference? There's been a huge disparity for years, and it's really unfair to those 9 or 10 seeds out West that would easily make the playoffs in the East.

All I've ever heard out of the NBA is that it's an anomaly and it will work itself out. Except that's total horseshit. Compare the last team getting in over the last 8 seasons against a .500 record. You'll notice that if anything, it's not working itself out, it's getting ridiculously worse!

2010 - even in the East, 18 over in the West - +18 West
2009 - 4 under in the East, 14 over in the West - +18 West
2008 - 7 under in the East, 18 over in the West - +25 West
2007 - 2 under in the East, 2 over in the West - +4 West
2006 - 2 under in the East, 6 over in the West - +8 West
2005 - 2 over in the East, 8 over in the West - +6 West
2004 - 10 under in the East, 4 over in the West - +14 West
2003 - 2 over in the East, 6 over in the West - +4 West


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 06, 2011, 07:20:26 PM
I wonder why that is happening?  It makes no sense, particularly when the west has such shitstains a the Golden State Warriors, the Sacramento Kings, and the Clippers. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 06, 2011, 07:24:16 PM
Having those worthless teams actually inflates the record of the good teams in the west.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2011, 07:31:40 PM
Having those worthless teams actually inflates the record of the good teams in the west.

It's equal opportunity though, unlike the overall records. In the last 10 years (counting this one) the worst team in the league has come out of the East 4 times, the West 3 times, and 3 times it's been a tie.

Pretty damn even on cellar dwelling.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 06, 2011, 08:03:13 PM
If there's a discrepancy it's because the west teams are generally beating their eastern counterparts more.  There are dogs in the east as well.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 08, 2011, 09:23:33 AM
The Bulls are starting to look like the real deal after a shaky start to the season.  Good, I like the Bulls.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 08, 2011, 10:14:41 AM
The Bulls are starting to look like the real deal after a shaky start to the season.  Good, I like the Bulls.

I wouldn't fall in love with them. They are destined to break people's hearts in the playoffs by losing in the second round. They are the new Cleveland, I think.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on April 08, 2011, 11:13:50 AM
Cleveland was one badass with a bunch of has beens and roleplayers badly mashed together. I would think these Bulls have a better core with which to advance.

Still, it's a hard prospect when you've got to beat Orlando in the playoffs in a 7 game series.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: KallDrexx on April 08, 2011, 11:34:07 AM
It's going to be sad when Dwight Howard becomes a free agent next year (I think?) and Orlando goes back to being a nobody for another 20 years.  If only they could learn to be consistent, they might actually win a championship.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 08, 2011, 11:41:05 AM
Teams with a shot at the title, in my opinion and in order:

1.  Lakers
2.  Bulls
3.  Celtics
4.  Orlando
5.  Heat
6.  Spurs


I really don't think the Spurs have it in them, but they've surprised me before.  The Lakers have the engine to do it.  I think they'll threepeat. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 08, 2011, 11:43:39 AM
It's going to be sad when Dwight Howard becomes a free agent next year (I think?) and Orlando goes back to being a nobody for another 20 years.  If only they could learn to be consistent, they might actually win a championship.

Maybe the Heat could pick him up too.  :awesome_for_real:

Seems like pretty soon the East is going to be Boston and Miami and no one else.

Here is the playoff picture if it started today. NBA Playoff Picture (http://www.nba.com/statistics/playoff_picture.html). If things stay roughly the same, the second round looks like it could pretty amazing.

Oh yeah. Go Lakers.

*Edit*

1.  Lakers
2.  Bulls
3.  Celtics
4.  Orlando
5.  Heat
6.  Spurs

I really dont think that Bulls or Orlando have it in them to take any of these teams in 7 games. The Lakers have the ability to play absolutely fantastic, and just destroy these teams, if they are playing well. I just hope they didnt peak too early. Consistent is something the Lakers have always struggled with.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 08, 2011, 12:25:01 PM
Here's my list:

1. Lakers


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: KallDrexx on April 08, 2011, 12:25:43 PM
Orlando will progress through the playoffs like they always do, but they will do something fuck-stupid and not get to the championship (like lose the first 3 games of the series, like last year against Boston).

Really, the only interest I have in the championship game is if some new teams get into the final round.  I'm bored of both Celtics and Lakers.  


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Zetleft on April 09, 2011, 06:26:37 AM
I love how no one gives props to the Spurs year after year.  That said I was more confident of them a few weeks ago before their slide but I still think they have it in them to go all the way.  LOS SPURS  :drill:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 09, 2011, 06:53:51 AM
I love how no one gives props to the Spurs year after year.  That said I was more confident of them a few weeks ago before their slide but I still think they have it in them to go all the way.  LOS SPURS  :drill:

The Spurs are a dangerous team, no doubt.  They've got a lot of savvy leadership and good team play.  They don't have the horses to defend against a truly talented team like the Lakers, and I think that Orlando would give them fits because of Howard.  I would love to see them win it though.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 10, 2011, 01:39:52 PM
I want to amend my prediction. I don't think Boston can do it any more. Not since the Perkins trade. They are playing like crap, and they have no real threat in the middle. Not to mention that team chemistry seems to be shot to shit.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 10, 2011, 01:46:35 PM
I want to amend my prediction. I don't think Boston can do it any more. Not since the Perkins trade. They are playing like crap, and they have no real threat in the middle. Not to mention that team chemistry seems to be shot to shit.

Pffft. They simply don't care and aren't playing out the season. I wouldn't take anything from their play over the last 10 games.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 10, 2011, 05:45:03 PM
Here's a pretty decent article talking about the contenders (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/110408&sportCat=nba) from ESPN.

Quote
13. Atlanta Hawks
Six reasons we need a lockout ...

$16,324,500
$18,038,573
$19,752,645
$21,466,718
$23,180,790
$24,894,863

That's what Atlanta owes Joe Johnson, by year, through 2016. You know, because any time you can totally overpay someone hitting his 30s who isn't one of the best 15 players in the league, you have to do it.



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 11, 2011, 08:34:01 PM
Apparently the WNBA had a draft, and it gets a highlight segment on ESPN. Do we really have to keep justifying this sport? Aren't there better things to empower women than pretending that they are relevant in basketball or we should care? Oh and god help you if you're a broadcaster and you don't kiss their asses publically. That would be wrong.

Does the league make money? No. Does it have a hope of making money or actually commanding television dollars above on par with the other professional leagues? Not unless you count the MLS as a relevant league. Even if you do, the WNBA finals last year still got beat by the MLS finals in a down year. Hell, one of the teams in the WNBA final was in my own city, and nobody gave a shit.

Jokingly in Atlanta we say if you're white, you follow the Braves. If you're black, you follow the Hawks. If you're drunk, you follow the Thrashers. If you have a pulse, you follow the Falcons. If you're lost, you follow the Dream.



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on April 12, 2011, 05:40:47 AM
Thunder actually have an chance to nab the number 2 seed in the west, which is insane.  I hope they make it deep into the playoffs...I'm fucking tired of the Lakers and Celtics.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 12, 2011, 08:00:35 AM

Seems like pretty soon the East is going to be Boston and Miami and no one else.


Boston is done, they are too old.  The only way they can even contend in the playoffs is by shutting down during the season.  It worked last year, they basically quit playing after christmas and got to the Finals, this year they had to fight harder and it has cost them.  The east is going to be Miami and Chicago and whoever wins the Dwight Howard lotto, if it's New Jersey and they keep Deron they are instant contenders.  Chicago might not even get past the second round this year, they are likely facing Orlando and after Howard knocks Rose on his ass a couple of times the Bulls are going to be left without an offense, either through injury or by Rose becoming a shooter instead of a driver.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 12, 2011, 08:02:29 AM
Both the Spurs and the Celtics have been in "shut it down" mode for the past month or so.  I expect them to be formidable in the playoffs.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 12, 2011, 08:12:57 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3OXVegfbIA&feature=player_embedded

 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 12, 2011, 08:53:07 AM
Thunder actually have an chance to nab the number 2 seed in the west, which is insane.  I hope they make it deep into the playoffs...I'm fucking tired of the Lakers and Celtics.

I, on the other hand, hope they never win another game. Fuck Clay Bennett in his inbred lying asshole.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on April 12, 2011, 09:25:31 AM
Thunder actually have an chance to nab the number 2 seed in the west, which is insane.  I hope they make it deep into the playoffs...I'm fucking tired of the Lakers and Celtics.

I, on the other hand, hope they never win another game. Fuck Clay Bennett in his inbred lying asshole.

Don't get me wrong, I hate the the fact that they moved and the whole way it went down.  I was a huge Sonics fan, though, so they are still the team I root for, no matter what.  Most sports teams owners can go fuck themselves.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 12, 2011, 09:29:15 AM
It's a business that is focused on making money, which makes the move from Seattle so weird.  I don't think they are in any better position now than they were in Seattle.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 13, 2011, 08:50:00 AM

Seems like pretty soon the East is going to be Boston and Miami and no one else.


Boston is done, they are too old.  The only way they can even contend in the playoffs is by shutting down during the season.  It worked last year, they basically quit playing after christmas and got to the Finals, this year they had to fight harder and it has cost them.  The east is going to be Miami and Chicago and whoever wins the Dwight Howard lotto, if it's New Jersey and they keep Deron they are instant contenders.  Chicago might not even get past the second round this year, they are likely facing Orlando and after Howard knocks Rose on his ass a couple of times the Bulls are going to be left without an offense, either through injury or by Rose becoming a shooter instead of a driver.

I watched a ton of NBA at the beginning of the season, and then for various reasons, I didnt get to much the second half. During the first half Boston was a machine. They where too old and too tired, yet they just steamrolled everyone. I think it had to do with them having amazing chemistry and really knowing each other. I think this Perkins/Robinson trade really fucked that up.

The Thunder and Bulls for me are this years "Wait, who?" teams. Kind of came out of nowhere, for me anyway.

I hope the Heat choke in the first round. I don't think they will, but it would be fantastic if they did.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 13, 2011, 10:25:24 AM
Atlanta is going to suuuuuuuuuuuuck in the playoffs.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 13, 2011, 11:34:32 AM

Seems like pretty soon the East is going to be Boston and Miami and no one else.


Boston is done, they are too old.  The only way they can even contend in the playoffs is by shutting down during the season.  It worked last year, they basically quit playing after christmas and got to the Finals, this year they had to fight harder and it has cost them.  The east is going to be Miami and Chicago and whoever wins the Dwight Howard lotto, if it's New Jersey and they keep Deron they are instant contenders.  Chicago might not even get past the second round this year, they are likely facing Orlando and after Howard knocks Rose on his ass a couple of times the Bulls are going to be left without an offense, either through injury or by Rose becoming a shooter instead of a driver.

I watched a ton of NBA at the beginning of the season, and then for various reasons, I didnt get to much the second half. During the first half Boston was a machine. They where too old and too tired, yet they just steamrolled everyone. I think it had to do with them having amazing chemistry and really knowing each other. I think this Perkins/Robinson trade really fucked that up.



But Perkins was injured through the beginning of the season, the fact that they played so well without him was one of the reasons they felt they could trade him.  That is just how Boston plays, last year they started 25-3 and finished 27-27 and it got them to the finals.  They bust their ass to secure a decent playoff seed then they shut down to recuperate before the playoffs, i doubt it is going to work nearly as well this year as it did last though.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 13, 2011, 01:16:00 PM
Atlanta is going to suuuuuuuuuuuuck in the playoffs.

You're not giving Joe Johnson enough credit.....  :grin:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on April 14, 2011, 08:27:37 AM
It's a business that is focused on making money...

I know you're right and that it's naive to want it to be otherwise, but shit, you'd like to think that people who owned professional sports teams would love the sport and care for their team before any bottom line implications.  Shit, most of them are multi-billionaires and the financial results of their sporting teams are probably only a small part of their portfolios...they just can't break the life-long habit of being the same fucking assholes that got them where they are in the first place.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 14, 2011, 08:31:05 AM
They didn't get to multi-billionaires by enjoying losing money.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 14, 2011, 09:54:37 AM
It's a business that is focused on making money...

I know you're right and that it's naive to want it to be otherwise, but shit, you'd like to think that people who owned professional sports teams would love the sport and care for their team before any bottom line implications.  Shit, most of them are multi-billionaires and the financial results of their sporting teams are probably only a small part of their portfolios...they just can't break the life-long habit of being the same fucking assholes that got them where they are in the first place.

The Magic owner is like that.  He's a very old multi billionaire and he wants a championship more than anything.  That's why the Magic have had basically a blank checkbook the past few seasons, which they haven't exactly used wisely but you can't say the owner hasn't given them free reigns to spend on talent.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on April 14, 2011, 10:46:09 AM
Yeah, see, that's what I'm talking about.  I'd like to think that if I were that billionaire, I'd be my usual douchebag self in all my other ventures.  For my sports team, I would try to win at all costs, because FUCK those other teams.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 14, 2011, 10:55:32 AM
That's awesome, Cyrrex.  That's why I like Mark Cuban.  He's a competitive bastard for sure. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 14, 2011, 10:59:58 AM
Cuban is a giant douche, but I do admire the way he runs his sports teams.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on April 14, 2011, 11:06:35 AM
Yeah, there are plenty of reasons not to like the guy, but he loves him some sports.  Even as much as I dislike Jerry Jones, that motherfucker sure wants to win.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 14, 2011, 01:47:14 PM
All these big owners are douches.  I wouldn't be surprised if all of them had big freezers full of dead bodies somewhere. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 14, 2011, 03:15:21 PM
All these big owners are douches.  I wouldn't be surprised if all of them had big freezers full of dead bodies somewhere. 

I like to think the Buss family have a bit more class than some of the other owners, but then I'm really fucking biased.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 14, 2011, 03:53:22 PM
From what little I could glean from watching Buss play poker on TV, he seems like a decent enough dude. Which is why I was disappointed when he didn't drop Kobe when he got to rapin'.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 14, 2011, 05:11:17 PM
From what little I could glean from watching Buss play poker on TV, he seems like a decent enough dude. Which is why I was disappointed when he didn't drop Kobe when he got to rapin'.

Kobe didn't rape that chick. Just saying. He's an adulterous jackass, but he's not a Ben Rothlesfucker.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 14, 2011, 05:35:32 PM
It was buttsex, so technically it wasn't cheatin' either.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 14, 2011, 06:02:19 PM
Butt Intruder?  :rimshot:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 16, 2011, 12:53:59 PM
I can't believe that Indianapolis blew that lead.  Good.  Fuck Tyler Hansbrough.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 19, 2011, 02:14:54 PM
There have been some fun games to watch.

Oddly, the Chicago game yesterday, while constantly close, just wasnt a very fun game to watch for me. Sundays Boston game was pretty awesome, and the Lakers, gah. Gasol decided to not show up.

The 76ers vs The heat is just sad to watch.

I missed the first Portland game, hoping to catch game 2 tonight.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 19, 2011, 02:17:49 PM
Wake me in round 2 when the bottom feeders are out.

Pacers v. the Bulls? We're letting sub .500 teams play D-Rose? Yeah, that's good TV.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 20, 2011, 06:19:30 AM
Uh the Pacers have done incredibly well.  The Bulls are barely beating them at home and both of those games could have easily gone the other way.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 20, 2011, 06:50:07 AM
Uh the Pacers have done incredibly well.  The Bulls are barely beating them at home and both of those games could have easily gone the other way.

You don't get any kudos from me for a close loss in the playoffs. Knicks played the Celtics close too. They will still both be out in 5 games.

What seperates a winning team from a losing team in the NBA is ability to close out a game in the 4th quarter.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 20, 2011, 07:13:28 AM
You are still missing out on some good basketball if you don't think Bulls/Pacers is worth paying attention to.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 20, 2011, 07:21:36 AM
You are still missing out on some good basketball if you don't think Bulls/Pacers is worth paying attention to.

There are some intriguing matchups in the first round. Denver versus OKC, Atlanta versus Orlando, and Memphis versus San Antonio are all going to have tight games where the teams will trade some wins.

Chicago and the Pacers don't make that list. I can't get excited by close basketball unless the outcome is in doubt.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on April 20, 2011, 11:03:54 AM
I am not a big fan of 'Mello, but damn. He put on a great performance last night. He almost beat the Celtics all by himself. Hell, he should have, but one of the scrubs choked right at the end there and fumbled the ball.

Even though Boston is up 2-0 in the series, so far it has been the most exciting to watch for me.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 20, 2011, 02:11:16 PM
He almost beat the Celtics all by himself.

This has been the story of his NBA life-  "almost".


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 22, 2011, 06:54:37 AM
So how we feeling about the matchups at this point?

One's I like - Atlanta and Orlando looks to be really good heading back to Atlanta. The comments about "see you in round 2" have been good fodder for the local sportsjocks here.
Memphis and Spurs - I still like this matchup and think it will be back and forth. The Grizz fill in the gaps well to exploit the Spurs weaknesses.
Portland and Dallas - I think that Portland can close the gap and make this 2-2. If that happens, it's a freaking war and has the potentional to be the best round 1 matchup

One's I don't like - I think yall know. The Miami and Chicago series are total jokes. I want to see them against some real competition before I make a judgement if they can go the distance.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 22, 2011, 07:16:49 AM
Memphis totally has the ability to beat the Spurs.  They played them tough at home at the end of the season, beat them in Memphis and now stole a game from them at home in the playoffs.  I think the Spurs will eventually pull ahead and send the Grizzlies packing, but they've got the athletic type players that are tough on D (Tony Allen) that can give the Spurs fits.

The Mavericks are a house of cards.  I've never been completely impressed with them, even though I love Nowitski. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 22, 2011, 07:37:35 PM
Wow, Atlanta. Just...WOW!

If yall didn't see that one, it might be the best finish of round one so far.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 23, 2011, 06:22:09 AM
All that money to Joe Johnson seems to be paying off.   :grin:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 23, 2011, 08:19:40 AM
I mean that game had everything at the end. 4 lead changes, a headbutt, a face slap, technical fouls, 2 ejections, and a prayer 3 off the glass to seal it at the end.

Pure awesome.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 23, 2011, 04:20:39 PM
Dallas is looking very good so far.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 23, 2011, 04:51:11 PM
Dallas is looking very good so far.


Oh boy.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 24, 2011, 08:31:48 AM
Dallas is looking very good so far.


Oh boy.

Guess I quit watching that one too early.  What a choke.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 24, 2011, 09:56:37 AM
This has been one of the most interesting first rounds in a long time.  Hell one of the only interesting first rounds in like ever.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: FatuousTwat on April 24, 2011, 07:11:00 PM
I can't believe I fucking missed that. GAH!

I'm glad Roy has gotten his confidence back.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 26, 2011, 08:26:53 AM
Wow.  The Spurs really suck. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 26, 2011, 10:29:03 AM
Wow.  The Spurs really suck. 

The Grizz are my new bandwagon team because it's funny.

Also, good lord how pissed are you if you're a Sonics fan in Seattle right now? 3 years in OKC and they are crushing people in the playoffs?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: KallDrexx on April 26, 2011, 10:37:25 AM
The Magic's amazing beard powers haven't come into full effect yet I see  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 26, 2011, 01:22:46 PM
The Grizzlies are a fun bandwagon team because they play so hard.  They really hustle like you don't typically see in pro sports any more.  I hope they beat the Spurs and anyone else they play.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on April 26, 2011, 01:35:03 PM
My new bandwagon team is Chris Paul.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 26, 2011, 06:59:51 PM
Hawks getting the smackdown.  The Magic finally came to play.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 26, 2011, 07:02:00 PM
Hawks getting the smackdown.  The Magic finally came to play.


There's the Hawks team I was expecting. Maybe they get lucky and win at home in game 6. Otherwise, spectacular failure imminent.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on April 26, 2011, 07:45:12 PM
Orlando plays a thoroughly average game and wins by 25, this is how i expected the series to go.  If Orlando can manage to keep playing at least average they will take the next two games too.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 26, 2011, 08:16:50 PM
Orlando plays a thoroughly average game and wins by 25, this is how i expected the series to go.  If Orlando can manage to keep playing at least average they will take the next two games too.

Well, we knew things were bad when they went 2-23 beyond the arc and still only managed to lose by 4 on the road.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Zetleft on April 27, 2011, 08:33:15 PM
Holy shit that Spurs game was stressfull. Amazing finish, clutch almost 3 by Manu followed by the actual 3 by Neal to get it to OT.    :drill:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 28, 2011, 05:40:57 PM
Spurs got lucky as fuck.  They should be home right now.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: KallDrexx on April 28, 2011, 06:00:05 PM
This magic game is fucking embarrassing


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 28, 2011, 06:43:21 PM
Dammit why can the Hawks not put people away when they are playing TERRIBLE!

AHGHAGA!  :tantrum:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on April 28, 2011, 06:58:25 PM
Hey Nelson, the Hawks will say "Hi" to Derrick Rose for you in the second round.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on April 29, 2011, 07:14:55 AM
Really great first round.  I think my interest in basketball is finally re-kindled.

I fucking hate Ron Artest.  Because he's good and he's a Laker.  He and Bynum squished the Hornets yesterday.  I see them playing OKC in the Western Finals, and then Artest is going to shut down OKC again all by his damn self.  Fuck.

No idea what to expect in the East.  Other than Rose, the Bulls are too hit/miss.  The Heat can go fuck themselves.  Boston is supposed to be old and crusty, but Rondo is a freaking basketball genius.  The Hawks?  Fuck if I know, but I don't think they can beat Rose. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on April 29, 2011, 04:02:47 PM
(http://lakers.topbuzz.com/gallery/d/278140-2/Laker+fan+holds+up+a+sign+that+says+Ron+Ron.JPG)


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on April 29, 2011, 08:51:57 PM
Zach Randolph is a fucking stud.  He looks like a fat kid in a skinny kid's body but he can ball.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 05, 2011, 04:20:08 AM
Wow.  Mavs going home with a 2 game lead on the Lakers.  That was unexpected. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on May 05, 2011, 06:12:34 AM
Hilarious. Also the Hawks acted like the Hawks last night. Nice shooting, dickheads.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 05, 2011, 06:33:20 AM
When the Hawks shoot well they are very, very good.  And Josh Smith should be able to do better than that against Carlos Boozer, who is an absolute sieve when it comes to defense.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on May 05, 2011, 06:56:28 AM
Josh Smith draws the ire of Atlanta fans. He's extremely talented, well paid, and falls in love with horrible jump shots when he should take it to the rack. He's 7-25 shooting from the field. He's also bricked a trio of the 3 pointers in the series. Why is my forward shooting 3's?!?!

21 points in this series sucks. He's getting outscored, outrebounded, and outplayed by an older Carlos Boozer.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on May 05, 2011, 07:10:35 AM
Haha, Lakers!


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 05, 2011, 07:22:24 AM
Josh Smith, if I remember all the things I've read about him correctly, seems to be a very immature kid.  If he the work ethic of Kobe or Derrick Rose he would be a perennial all star.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on May 05, 2011, 08:19:01 AM
Haha, Lakers!

Yes, indeed.  I still think they'll win.  They are playing the Mavs afterall.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on May 05, 2011, 08:24:16 AM
Haha, Lakers!

Yes, indeed.  I still think they'll win.  They are playing the Mavs afterall.

That was brutal to watch. I have to agree with a comment I read. That was probably the worst Lakers game I have ever watched. It wasnt like the Mavs played very well, it was that the Lakers couldnt do anything.

2/18 from 3 point land? Previous franchise worse was 2/13.
Shooting 50% free throws.
Steve Blake 0-5.
Several streaks of 0 points scored for multiple minutes.

I think when all was said and done, the Lakers managed to score around 1 point a minute for the second half of the game.

And even with all those horrible stats the Lakers where still within easy striking distance the whole game.

Ugh. Horrible. It was like Bynum was the only player who showed up to play.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 05, 2011, 12:04:39 PM
Looks like Artest will likely be suspended for game 3 (http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/news/story?id=6483153).  Woo!


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 05, 2011, 12:18:23 PM
That was a retarded foul.  Hope they suspend him more than that.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 05, 2011, 12:27:48 PM
With his history of a year long suspension I bet they aren't too lenient with him.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on May 06, 2011, 09:00:22 PM
:sad_panda:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 07, 2011, 06:38:45 AM
If the Lakers end up getting swept on the second round that might be a more disappointing ending than even the Spurs and Magic got for their season.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on May 07, 2011, 01:15:46 PM
I'm loving this round, I hope the Celtics and Lakers both get swept, I don't want to see either of them in the finals.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 07, 2011, 01:21:44 PM
Since Orlando lost i'm an anyone-but-Miami fan, hoping the Lakers pull through because i think they are the only ones with a chance.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on May 07, 2011, 04:59:08 PM
I'm supporting the Lakers, but I want to see Dirk do well.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on May 08, 2011, 02:39:04 PM
Lakers sure went out with class.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 08, 2011, 03:03:09 PM
Lakers sure went out with class.  :uhrr:

I was surprised to see Bynum pull such a jackass maneuver.  He's not normally a guy you'd associate with that shit, unlike Artest.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on May 08, 2011, 03:43:55 PM
I really enjoy watching Kobe at press conferences sometimes. It just seems like he still can't believe how asinine the questions he's being asked are.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on May 08, 2011, 03:51:52 PM
Tough to argue that was the Lakers out there.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on May 08, 2011, 04:33:58 PM
Lakers sure went out with class.  :uhrr:

I was surprised to see Bynum pull such a jackass maneuver.  He's not normally a guy you'd associate with that shit, unlike Artest.

Actually, thats not true. This is the second time this year, third time in total, he has pulled that BS.

That was just crap.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 08, 2011, 04:51:46 PM
Turned off the game after the half, what did he do?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on May 08, 2011, 05:06:56 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAnzAesm8e0

Quoth the announcer "that is one of the biggest Bush League things I've ever seen"


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 08, 2011, 05:29:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAnzAesm8e0

Quoth the announcer "that is one of the biggest Bush League things I've ever seen"

Biggest since the last (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbcjL7AVxMA&feature=player_embedded) two (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuSoxYFRlAI&feature=player_embedded) times Bynum did it he means?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on May 08, 2011, 06:51:42 PM
That's unreal. How do you continue to let a guy play when he's pulling that shit?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 08, 2011, 06:58:05 PM
Lakers sure went out with class.  :uhrr:

I was surprised to see Bynum pull such a jackass maneuver.  He's not normally a guy you'd associate with that shit, unlike Artest.

Actually, thats not true. This is the second time this year, third time in total, he has pulled that BS.

That was just crap.

Yeah, I just read that on ESPN.  I totally missed it, which is pretty strange because I'm usually up to speed with what is going on in the NBA.  I hope they trade him to the Clippers.

Edit:  Somehow Bynum still has a reputation of being a "nice guy".  I'm not sure how after those two clips.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 08, 2011, 08:41:33 PM
It's cause he looks exactly (http://ll-media.tmz.com/2009/06/04/0603-getty-1.jpg) like Tracy Morgan.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on May 09, 2011, 05:09:02 AM
All I know is that OKC and Chicago need to pull their shit together, ASAP.



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Hoax on May 09, 2011, 09:28:37 AM
How can you root against Zach Randolf? I have $$$ reasons to want to see OKC win but I can't help but root for that crazy motherfucker.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 09, 2011, 10:48:05 AM
I actually like Randolph on the court.  He's a beast on offense and defense and rebounds like crazy.  I hope the Grizzlies go far.  I agree with you that he's a nutjob though, although less so than say, Gilbert Arenas or Ron Artest. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 09, 2011, 03:33:44 PM
Glad to see my lifelong hatred of the Lakers justified yet again. What a giant pack of cunts.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on May 09, 2011, 10:47:21 PM
OKC-Memphis is why I watch the NBA.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 10, 2011, 09:14:45 AM
OKC-Memphis is why I watch the NBA.

Should be Seattle-Vancouver  :oh_i_see: :heartbreak:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on May 12, 2011, 06:23:51 PM
Kobe face...win championships (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFgNtAh2TsE&feature=player_embedded)


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on May 12, 2011, 06:57:33 PM
I'm sure Stern feels the same way.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on May 18, 2011, 01:05:32 PM
I used to have a lot of respect for Kareem.  As he's getting older he just seems like a whiney punk (http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/news/story?id=6563112). 

Quote
"I don't understand (it). It's either an oversight or they're taking me for granted," Abdul-Jabbar told The Sporting News in a recent interview. "I'm not going to try to read people's minds, but it doesn't make me happy. It's definitely a slight. I feel slighted."

The six-time NBA MVP sounded even more offended in a statement released subsequently by his business manager.

"I am highly offended by the total lack of acknowledgement of my contribution to Laker success," Abdul-Jabbar was quoted as saying. "I guess being the lynchpin for five world championships is not considered significant enough in terms of being part of Laker history."



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on May 18, 2011, 02:54:57 PM
Disrespected.

It's the athlete's whine-du-jour. Seems to be more popular with the African-Americans.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 18, 2011, 03:06:05 PM
Shocking that a bitter whiny young man turned into a bitterer whinier old man. Who would have seen that coming?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on May 18, 2011, 05:03:34 PM
Quote
It's definitely a slight. I feel slighted.

Just reading this as text makes me think it should be in green.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 03, 2011, 06:34:19 AM
Dirk Nowitzki is an absolute badass.  He's truly Larry Bird with athletic ability and height.  Wow, what a game that was.



Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on June 03, 2011, 11:26:07 AM
Yeah this may be the first (and last) time I'll ever be rooting for a Texas team in anything. Helps that they have Kidd too.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Jeff Kelly on June 08, 2011, 05:34:46 AM
The only thing going for the Heat is Wade he made 33 Points in game 4. LeBron was awful and has been the entire final series (Karma is a bitch apparently and I suppose quite a few Cleveland fans are rooting for the Mavs right now).

Ever since the Supersonics played the Bulls in 1996, this is probably the closest a German player ever got to winning an NBA ring and I hope they will pull though and win game 5 and 6.

Dirk was simply awesome, broken finger, 104° fever and still the boss on the court.

If only the games weren't on at 3 a.m. Central European Time.

The refereeing so far has been truly awful, though. I get that NBA finals are competitive but the amount of defensive and offensive fouls and interferences the refs have allowed so far is ridiculous, the Heat should lead on fouls by quite a margin in my book.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on June 08, 2011, 06:33:23 AM
A star player in the NBA pretty much has to attack someone with an angle grinder to get called for a foul.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 08, 2011, 06:52:38 AM
Dallas is locked in right now. They need this next game to establish momentum. Force Miami to win 2 at home to take it.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 08, 2011, 07:33:26 AM
Dirk was simply awesome, broken finger, 104° fever and still the boss on the court.


There's a lot of talk about Koby and Wade and James, but Nowitzki is the best player in the NBA right now.  His cast is, and has been, dismal compared to the surrounding teams of these other guys, but he still manages to pull his team along. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 08, 2011, 07:20:17 PM
Charles Barkley is fucking awesome. (http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nba/news/story?id=6642006) 

Quote
"Listen, if the Miami Heat were playing the Washington Generals I would pick the Washington Generals," Barkley said with a chuckle. "It's something about that team that annoys me.

"They just a whiny bunch and I can't root for them."


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on June 08, 2011, 08:24:09 PM
I've always <3ed Sir Charles.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ozzu on June 09, 2011, 06:08:23 AM
The Mavs pretty much have to win tonight. If they go down 3-2 and have to win 2 in a row in Miami to take the series? I don't see that happening.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 07:04:36 AM
Yep.  Tonight should be an awesome game.  I recommend tuning in.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 09, 2011, 07:23:16 AM
I think this game comes down to two players, and they aren't the stars.

Jason Terry and Shawn Marion need to be effective for the Mavericks in order for them to claim a win. Terry needs to get some steals, play solid D, and get his assists. Marion needs to get 5 rebounds, a block, and put up at least 10 in the paint. They both need to combine for at least 30 points.

When they both live up to those expectations, the Mavericks win games. When they don't, the Mavs are a mediocre team that Dirk can't carry.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 09:13:53 AM
Don't rule out the contribution of Tyson Chandler.  When he scores double digits the Mavs often win.  He's an important defensive/rebounding presence, sure, but when he's having a good game it opens thing sup more for Terry and Marion.  The Jet and The Matrix......what a couple of stupid nicknames. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Hoax on June 09, 2011, 10:01:37 AM
Really? I'm pretty sure this is Lebron's game to win long before it comes down to the contributions of those three or hell anyone on the Mavs. He's either going to complete some kind of confidence meltdown tonight or take the game over and I don't think there is much the Mavs can do to influence which happens short of Stevenson saying something dumb during the game and making LBJ go all hulk on his ass.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on June 09, 2011, 10:23:44 AM
Yeah, I think you guys are giving the Mavs a bit too much credit.  The Heat have simply collapsed near end of games and reverted into their early-season hot-potato style of offense.

The Mavs have played well enough to be able to capitalize on Miami's collapses, but without them this series would have been over already.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 09, 2011, 11:04:32 AM
Yeah, I think you guys are giving the Mavs a bit too much credit.  The Heat have simply collapsed near end of games and reverted into their early-season hot-potato style of offense.

The Mavs have played well enough to be able to capitalize on Miami's collapses, but without them this series would have been over already.

I don't think so. There's a pattern here about Lebron, and it has nothing to do with how well he plays. In fact, he's been getting progressively worse throughout the series, yet they are still 2-2. I'll go as far as saying he's a non-factor so far.

Lebron has 24 points and 9 rebounds = win
20 points and 8 rebounds = loss
17 points and 3 rebounds = win
8 points and 9 rebounds = loss


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 09, 2011, 11:18:37 AM
Yeah, I think you guys are giving the Mavs a bit too much credit.  The Heat have simply collapsed near end of games and reverted into their early-season hot-potato style of offense.

The Mavs have played well enough to be able to capitalize on Miami's collapses, but without them this series would have been over already.

This.  This series was a sweep if it wasn't for about 12 minutes of horrible basketball by the Heat.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 11:22:10 AM
Games are 48 minutes though.  And a great team doesn't tank two games in the final minutes (almost three).


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 09, 2011, 11:58:30 AM
Miami collapses, so the Mavs win?

I think you're giving the Mavs no credit personally. Let's look at game 2. The Heat are up 15 with 7:11 left. Look at how many outside shots Miami is forced to take, and look how many times Dallas misses. Dallas went 10/11 in the last 7 minutes, and forced Miami to take nothing but outside shots. That's not a collapse by Miami, that's domination by Dallas.

Dallas forces Miami to take a 3 pointer, they miss. Dallas makes a jumper. Down 13.
Dallas forces Miami to take a 3 pointer, they miss. Dallas makes a layup. Down 11.
Lebron misses a driving layup. Dallas gets fouled, makes both shots. Down 9.
Dallas forces Miami to take a 21 foot jumper, they miss. Dallas makes a layup. Down 7.
Lebron fouled, makes both shots. Dallas makes a 3 pointer. Down 6.
Lebron misses a 16 footer. Dallas makes an 18 footer. Down 4.
Miami turns it over out of bounds. Dirk makes an 18 footer. Down 2.
Miami misses a 15 footer. Dallas gets blocked and turns it over. Still down 2.
Lebron misses 3 pointer, offensive rebound, Lebron misses 3 pointer, offensive rebound, stolen by Dallas. Dallas makes a layup. Tied
Dallas forces a 3 pointer, Miami misses. Dirk makes a 3 pointer. Up by 3.
Miami makes a 3 pointer. Dirk makes a driving layup. Dallas wins by 2.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 12:06:59 PM
And besides, how many times had Lebron done this in his career?  I think that we've moved beyond the "he's mailing it in" phase to the "he just can't do it" era.  He's not mentally tough enough to seal the deal.  Wade is, but he's bringing along a simpering crybaby and an overblown "star" in Bosh. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 09, 2011, 12:16:24 PM
Seriously? Before the finals Lebron was one of the top if not the best player in the playoffs. Matchups and defensive schemes matter.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 09, 2011, 12:25:00 PM
Lebron's a great player. He is one of the best in the league in terms of talent. He is not consistent, though.

I also don't think Miami dictates this series. I think Dallas does.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on June 09, 2011, 12:28:10 PM
He's just a polarizing figure, now especially.

People like to forget he won 55-60 game a year on Cleveland with a bunch dead weight around him.  Those teams were never going to win a championship.

He has bad games.  All of them do.  Just when he does it, it seems like it's an invalidation of his entire career every time it occurs.  Nobody shrug a shoulder when Wade throws up a stinker in the previous series. Wade just murders Dallas.  I don't know what it is about this team, but he just gets nutty.

Lebron doesn't seem like more a crybaby than every other player in the NBA.  All of them whine and bitch that they were fouled on every single shot they miss and most they make.  Just look at Dirk, Wade or even JJ Barea (if you can find him on the floor).  Kobe? He'll cry and then throw the entire team under the bus when he's done (had every right to, his supporting cast played like garbage this playoffs).

I suppose I'm a Lebron defender, but I don't find him any more odious than any other player in the NBA.  They've almost all got issues and unlikable aspects depending on where you stand.

edit: As for the series, I think Dallas is a better team when they play well.  Their ball movement and floor spacing can be incredible at times.  Plus, they've got some serviceable big interior players, which Miami lacks. I think Miami is poorly coached as well, their offensive sets disappear at times and that has to be on the coach.




Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 12:32:18 PM
Lebron is a very, very good player.  Then again so were Karl Malone, John Stockton, Allen Iverson and Charles Barkley.  They didn't have what it took to win a championship.  Lebron is in the prime of his playing days.  Age 26-29 is when most athletes are at their physical and mental best, yet he still can't get over the hump in the finals.  If they win this year it certainly isn't because of him, but because of the excellent play of Dwyane Wade.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on June 09, 2011, 12:44:13 PM
Iverson had a shit cast his entire career. Plus, he seemed to be unwilling to be less selfish.  I wouldn't put him with Malone, Stockton, Barkley (or Ewing, Miller, etc).

Stockton, Malone, Ewing and Barkley ran into Michael Fucking Jordan.  In a game of "rock, paper, scissors" Jordan is a nuclear bomb being lauched from orbit.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 01:01:10 PM
This is true, but out of a cast of the top 50 NBA players of all time very few do not have an NBA title.  I'm just throwing those guys out there as very good players who didn't have a title.  There are more than just those to pick from- Patrick Ewing, for instance.  And you actually make the point a little bit by showing that Lebron doesn't have a "Jordan" to go up against.  Koby is good, but he's not MJ and none of these teams, not even the Lakers of the past four years, can match up to the MJ teams of the 90s.  LBJ should have, by all rights, gotten himself a title by now.  And he probably would have one if he didn't choke so bad when the game got to the nitty gritty.  He just doesn't have the mental toughness of the true winners.  Of course if he can finish it up this year I'll take it all back and give him praise.  Still, he had to have Wade to make it happen......  This makes me think he's more the Pippin than the Jordan figure.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Jeff Kelly on June 09, 2011, 01:35:46 PM
Nowitzki is the far better player than LeBron. Without Nowitzki the Mavs would have never made it to the playoffs, without LeBron the Heat would have barely noticed a difference if you look at the stats.

Also I don't care for the Heat even if James were the best player since Jordan, he's still a ginormous dick and the Team is the NBA equivalent of a boy band with a cast of mercenaries that would sell their own grandmothers for a few dollars.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 01:46:16 PM
Dwyane Wade is a far better player than Lebron.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 09, 2011, 04:03:01 PM
Dwyane Wade is a far better player than Lebron.

Dwayne Wade has more confidence/mental toughness/clutch/whatever than LeBron, but if we're just going on basketball skills the above statement is completely wrong. If you were defining player in a more rounded sense then I would agree.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Hoax on June 09, 2011, 04:39:38 PM
You guys are fucking jokers.

You can't have it every way. If he doesn't win it proves he doesn't have it if he wins its because of Wade even though he carried Miami to the finals and nobody in their right mind would say that he couldn't have been mvp this season if not for a lot of non basketball factors.

Does he lack the steel of MJ or Kobe? Sure seems like it. But he also has 2-3 games to find that and I really think that if he does find his edge and win this championship it will not be the first and that wont be because he has Wade.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 09, 2011, 05:35:59 PM
Seriously? Before the finals Lebron was one of the top if not the best player in the playoffs. Matchups and defensive schemes matter.

Deshawn Stevenson did not hold Lebron to 8 points, nobody but Lebron did that.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on June 09, 2011, 06:38:45 PM
You guys are fucking jokers.

You can't have it every way. If he doesn't win it proves he doesn't have it if he wins its because of Wade even though he carried Miami to the finals and nobody in their right mind would say that he couldn't have been mvp this season if not for a lot of non basketball factors.

I should preface this comment by admitting I loathe the NBA in all it's splendor. That said, LeBron dug his own grave. He left Cleveland because he couldn't do it all by himself and the Cavs were not putting the pieces in place to supplement him. He showed this "MIA" performance several times in the playoffs in Cleveland and it begs the question, now that he has his supporting cast, why is he still under performing in some of these key games and relying on his teammates to bail out his poor play. Same shit happened in Cleveland, only with what some would consider a second rate cast - now that he has a first rate class, why does it continue to happen? It's eerily similar to exactly what happened in Cleveland in the playoffs. I will admit, LeBron is incredible when he is in the mindset and damn near unstoppable on the court when that happens. However, even if he wins, it will tainted with the notion that he basically sold out for a championship. I can't argue with what he did since a championship really does define you as a pro-American athlete (looking at you Marino). But how he went about doing it was a huge black mark.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 07:51:14 PM
Until Lebron brings home some trophies he will always be under the microscope in a bad way.  These people that are comparing him to MJ or even Koby are full of shit until that happens.  And yes, if they bring home a title this year it will be because of D-Wade.  Just look at Wade's stat line from the series (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/1987/dwyane-wade).  That's all you need to know.

Edit:  Here is James's (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/1966/lebron-james), just for shits and giggles.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 09, 2011, 08:39:34 PM
See what I meant about Terry and Marion now?

Barea was also HUGE.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 09, 2011, 08:42:40 PM
Note that Chandler had 13 points.  If he scores in double digits versus the Heat they win.  Marion had a good game but only had 8 points.  The whole team played well, which is really the big deal in the Heat versus Mavericks discussion.  The Mavs play as a team, the Heat don't. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 09, 2011, 08:46:48 PM
Marion's contributions aren't as a points guy though. He's a defensive dude, and he was +17 on the floor. That's frankly amazing. Add in the 4 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 steals, and he was a force.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 09, 2011, 08:49:01 PM
This is whats wrong with Lebron, the guy gets a triple double but his only two points in the fourth quarter come when the game is already decided.  Lebron James cannot score 2 points in the fourth quarter, i don't care how many rebounds or assists he gets.  Specially in a game that Wade is hurt.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Chimpy on June 09, 2011, 08:57:07 PM
I watched most of tonight's game because ABC is one of the 2 channels I get over the air.

I used to enjoy watching basketball on occasion when I was younger, but the game now just really does nothing for me. I think it is because seeing guys take 54 fucking steps from the 3 point line all the way to a layup at the basket and not having a travel called just seems  :ye_gods: . Why do they even bother making people dribble the ball at all anymore?

That being said, while I loathe rooting for Dallas because Mark Cuban has always rubbed me the wrong way when I see him interviewed etc., I was glad to see Dallas beat Miami simply because the stupid assed LeBron James bullshit last summer annoyed me more. Plus, seeing a guy who played for local small town high school rival (Brian Cardinal) when I was in high school win a title would be kind of cool.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on June 10, 2011, 01:17:14 AM
The Jet and The Matrix......what a couple of stupid nicknames. 

Was going through an ESPN article and I noticed that JET was in all capitals.  It's from his initials, Jason Terry's middle name Eugene :awesome_for_real:.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 10, 2011, 05:51:13 AM
I guess JET is acceptable then.   :oh_i_see:

I'm still not sold on the Matrix. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 10, 2011, 06:12:14 AM
I feel bad for Wade, the guy is playing like a champion but he can't do it alone in the fourth.  Championship teams don't collapse at the end of every single game.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 10, 2011, 06:43:34 AM
I'm going to pick at that again, but the Heat aren't collapsing at the end. They are getting beat by a better team.

How many times does it have to happen before people realize that?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 10, 2011, 06:47:02 AM
How many times does it have to happen before people realize that?

Apparently 4.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 10, 2011, 08:44:13 AM
I would like to invite LeBron and his buddies to eat a dick, and I hope Dallas wins games 6 and Mark Cuban moons the Miami crowd. Cuban is a douche, but LeBron is on a whole different planet of douchedom.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on June 10, 2011, 08:47:50 AM
I'm going to pick at that again, but the Heat aren't collapsing at the end. They are getting beat by a better team.

How many times does it have to happen before people realize that?

LeBron's 4th quarter stats say differently. It's apparently very similar to the idea of a prevent defense and playing not to lose in the NFL.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 10, 2011, 08:48:49 AM
Dear Lebron,

I cordially invite you and your associates to join me for an evening of entertainment and revelry. We will be celebrating the NBA title arriving in Dallas for the first time. Mark Cuban will be there to provide a special viewing of his posterior. Phallus will be served at 11PM sharp. Please RSVP by Sunday.

Yours in Christ,
WayAbvPar


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on June 10, 2011, 09:13:22 AM
I'm going to pick at that again, but the Heat aren't collapsing at the end. They are getting beat by a better team.

How many times does it have to happen before people realize that?

Dallas is clearly winning games, especially this last one.  A .692 True Shooting % is a big time performance.

What Dallas isn't doing is making LBJ disappear for quarters or entire games at time (G1/4 are his two lowest playoff usage rates) and chuck up long-shot jumpers with half the shot clock instead of doing anything that can be called "attacking".  Or, less number-y:

Deshawn Stevenson did not hold Lebron to 8 points, nobody but Lebron did that.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 12, 2011, 07:37:12 PM
Series over, baby!  Lebron James's Heat are at -23 when he's on the court (http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=310612014&refresh=30). 

But the Heat lost the series, right?  There's no way the Mavericks actually won it


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 12, 2011, 07:39:32 PM
How many times does it have to happen before people realize that?

Apparently 4.   :awesome_for_real:

Guess what?  :grin:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 12, 2011, 07:40:18 PM
Good series, glad to see the Mavs win. Hopefully this will allow us to truly appreciate Dirk and Kidd.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 12, 2011, 07:43:42 PM
And it completely exposed Lebron James yet again.  He may go down as the most overrated player to every play the game. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 12, 2011, 07:45:00 PM
Jason Terry should be MVP.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Surlyboi on June 12, 2011, 07:45:15 PM
Lebr0wned.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Rasix on June 12, 2011, 07:48:11 PM
And it completely exposed Lebron James yet again.  He may go down as the most overrated player to every play the game. 

It's a little early for that.  But yah, if he doesn't make good in a final, he'll never shake it.   

Better team won.  Terry should get the MVP as well.  When he came through, they won. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 12, 2011, 07:48:45 PM
Jason Terry should be MVP.

He was a critical reason they won, but I disagree.  He didn't bring it every night like Nowitzki did.  Dirk deserves it more.  

And it completely exposed Lebron James yet again.  He may go down as the most overrated player to every play the game. 

It's a little early for that.  But yah, if he doesn't make good in a final, he'll never shake it.   

Don't get me wrong, James is damned good.  But all this talk comparing him to MJ just has to stop.  The guy's nowhere close. 


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 12, 2011, 07:49:25 PM
Dirk was gonna get it anyway, but I love Marion and Terry, as I said earlier  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Strazos on June 12, 2011, 08:04:46 PM
I don't normally care about the basketball, but...

YAY!  :yahoo:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 12, 2011, 08:18:46 PM
As big as Jason Terry was on offense Marion and Kidd defending Wade and Lebron were a much bigger factor for their win, they all pale compared to Dirk though.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 12, 2011, 08:40:53 PM
Gotta love Terry calling out Lebron saying that the superstar couldn't guard him, and then put up 27.

The city of Cleveland should send JET some gift baskets.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on June 12, 2011, 08:46:36 PM
Series over, baby!  Lebron James's Heat are at -23 when he's on the court (http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=310612014&refresh=30).  

But the Heat lost the series, right?  There's no way the Mavericks actually won it.  

I'm a nerd so I'll point out that individual +/- is a pretty shitty stat.  It's basically the ERA of basketball.

That said, the Mavs totally closed this series out with two big shooting performances, especially tonight where Dirk really wasn't in his rhythm and the rest of the team came through.

LeBron though... it's telling that Spoelstra kept hitting on "mental stability" in the second half.  Usually how "clutch" a guy is is a load of bullshit, but LBJ is one of those dudes that has a boat-load of talent but just doesn't have it when it counts.  It's different from Kobe who is ultra-confident when everything's on the line but isn't actually better then he is normally (I'm saying that as a Lakers fan).  LBJ though has been worse both in his production and his assertiveness the past two losing series.

Maybe he'll figure it out down the line but this is something he has to fix, we can now be pretty sure that last season's series against the Celtics was clearly not some freak blip.

Still though, Dallas won close games early and then just shot the lights out to bring it home.  Grats to them and their fans on their first!

Edit: Celtics/Cavs last year was the second round, not the third.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Montague on June 13, 2011, 12:10:35 AM
Jason Terry should be MVP.

He was a critical reason they won, but I disagree.  He didn't bring it every night like Nowitzki did.  Dirk deserves it more.  

And it completely exposed Lebron James yet again.  He may go down as the most overrated player to every play the game. 

It's a little early for that.  But yah, if he doesn't make good in a final, he'll never shake it.   

Don't get me wrong, James is damned good.  But all this talk comparing him to MJ just has to stop.  The guy's nowhere close. 

He shouldn't even be in the same breath. Jordan made himself from a player with freakish athleticism but limited skills into probably the greatest all around player the game has ever seen. I hated the hype while it was going on but Jordan was a fucking assassin with 2 minutes left in the game. You just knew he was getting the ball in the last two minutes and you knew it was going in. Fucking fadeaway jumper with two guys in his face every single fucking time.

Meanwhile everybody laughs at Lebron.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on June 13, 2011, 12:19:35 AM
I think his upside is more Magic than Michael, but he's a ways from fulfilling it either way.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 13, 2011, 05:23:06 AM
Jason Terry should be MVP.

He was a critical reason they won, but I disagree.  He didn't bring it every night like Nowitzki did.  Dirk deserves it more.  

And it completely exposed Lebron James yet again.  He may go down as the most overrated player to every play the game. 

It's a little early for that.  But yah, if he doesn't make good in a final, he'll never shake it.   

Don't get me wrong, James is damned good.  But all this talk comparing him to MJ just has to stop.  The guy's nowhere close. 

He shouldn't even be in the same breath. Jordan made himself from a player with freakish athleticism but limited skills into probably the greatest all around player the game has ever seen. I hated the hype while it was going on but Jordan was a fucking assassin with 2 minutes left in the game. You just knew he was getting the ball in the last two minutes and you knew it was going in. Fucking fadeaway jumper with two guys in his face every single fucking time.

Meanwhile everybody laughs at Lebron.

Everyone said Lebron went to Miami because he wanted to be Pippen and not Jordan, at this point he isn't even measuring up to Pippen.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 06:02:35 AM
You just knew he was getting the ball in the last two minutes and you knew it was going in. Fucking fadeaway jumper with two guys in his face every single fucking time.

Just as an aside here, we tend to have a pretty selective memory of Jordan. From http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9665 (http://www.basketball-reference.com/blog/?p=9665) comments;

Quote
There's more to the narrative than just the success too. It's the way he was so dramatically crucial to all that success. He not only won, but he did it in such a way that it was clearly his play that decided the outcome - which puts a strange pressure on modern players to not just win, but to win in spectacular fashion, something Bryant seemed to get caught up in at times with his shoot first and find an opening later style. Take a trip down memory lane at the story of Jordan's titles:

1991 - Defeats the best player of the last decade (Magic Johnson), has maybe the best statistical Finals ever (according to SPM it is), does the switch hand move to cap off the most ridiculous string of made field goals anybody could remember in game 2, hits a buzzer-beater in game 3 to go to OT and then dominates for the series turning win. Finishes off LA with passes to open teammates (averaged 11 assists to 3 turnovers on the series) while winning all three road games, and the lasting image is him holding the Finals trophy crying.

1992 - 6 treys and 35 points in 1st half of game 1, domination of rival Clyde Drexler, caps 15 point game 6 comeback with go-ahead steal and dunk sequence. Lasting image is the shrug.

1993 - Sets Finals record by averaging 41+ points per game. Dramatic 55 point performance in game 4 (5?) with game winning make over Barkley. Scores 9 of Chicago's 12 4th quarter points in clinching game 6 and draws the double team in the back court that frees up Paxson for the series winner. Lasting image is him whispering something in Chuck's ear after proving he was better than the MVP.

1996 - Has what might be his worst playoff series ever and still manages to have the best game of any player in the series in game 3, where he scored 35 or so and put his team up 3-0. Kerr told Simmons in one of their podcasts that he thought the team lost focus and gave up the next two, but the crucial point is that the only road game either team won was the one Jordan took in hand. Other than that it was ugly. Lasting image is Jordan on the floor with the game ball balling on Father's Day two years after his dad passed.

1997 & 1998 - In 8 Bulls wins over Utah Jordan hit 3 game winners (game 1 '97, flu game, and game 6 '98) and had a game winning assist (game 6 '97). He also closed both series with a game winning pass and a game winning assist. He basically redefined the notion of clutch and made everyone believe that even if Shaq, Robinson, and Malone had better numbers than him all year long, he was indisputably the best of the best at ages 34 and 35.

This is why his shoe company slogan is "Become legendary". The man created his own mythos on the court. And here's what's lost: he had some bad games. He missed some big shots. But nobody remembers those, and so the players cast in his role in today's games aren't given the slack at the time.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on June 13, 2011, 08:07:08 AM
MJ was amazing for more than just his numbers, and probably even more than how clutch he appeared to be.  It was the manner in which he did things, and his confidence in doing so.  He didn't just throw up 35 points on you, he threw up 35 fucking amazing points on you.  He didn't just dunk the ball on you, he fucking soared over you with the grace of a gazelle and the power of a lion and stabbed you in the face with his cock on the way to the rim.  He did things with the ball that you never dreamed of, and couldn't possibly imitate.  He defied gravity.  He made his teammates look amazing and his opponents look utterly stupid.

Lebron does one or two of these things some of the time.  MJ did it all the time.  For all his talent, Lebron isn't even the best player on his own team.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 13, 2011, 08:26:31 AM
NBA and David Stern can still go jump up their own assholes, but knowing LBJ lost definitely warms the cockles of my cold dead black heart.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Merusk on June 13, 2011, 08:28:32 AM
I hate basketball and Jordan was one of the only players I've ever enjoyed watching.   That kind of showmanship is what made him legendary.

LeBron not only looks awkward, but it seems like he chokes when he's needed the most.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 13, 2011, 09:01:37 AM
I don't hate Lebron. I think he's going to win a ring in the next 3 years. I think he needs to learn how to be humble. I think he needs to learn how to be cold in the clutch, and have the media off his back.

Now that he's lost. Now that he's been humbled on the biggest stage. I think the media will ease off of him a bit. Not a ton, but enough.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on June 13, 2011, 09:16:50 AM
I actually think it'll get even worse for him now.  And he kinda deserves it...not for losing, but for being a giant douche.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 13, 2011, 09:24:14 AM
I think Colin Cowherd had it right. Guys with good fathers in their lives make the best superstars in the NBA. Guys that didn't have that always seem to lack the maturity necessary to get to that pinnacle.

Lebron lacks a lot of the maturity he needs, even his is post-game interviews, to be a "cold-iron" player.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on June 13, 2011, 09:50:01 AM
I don't hate Lebron. I think he's going to win a ring in the next 3 years. I think he needs to learn how to be humble. I think he needs to learn how to be cold in the clutch, and have the media off his back.

Now that he's lost, AGAIN. Now that he's been humbled on the biggest stage AGAIN. I think the media will ease off of him a bit. Not a ton, but enough.

I see this a lot lately. People seem to assume his years in Cleveland were done in some black hole, minor league. He was perennially in the playoffs and got swept in the only finals with the Cavs by an insanely good Spurs team. Say what you will about the Cleveland teams he played for, but he didn't play alone and didn't have the seasons they had by being completely alone. Granted, he didn't have Wade or Bosch to lean on while in Cleveland, but the results with his own game are eerily similar.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: naum on June 13, 2011, 09:57:50 AM
A man is in a bar drinking and LeBron James walks in. The man walks up to him and asks LeBron if he has change for a dollar. LeBron hands the man 75 cents back. The man looks at LeBron puzzled until LeBron says "Sorry about that, I always forget about the fourth quarter"…  :yahoo:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 13, 2011, 10:14:52 AM
Say what you will about the Cleveland teams he played for, but he didn't play alone and didn't have the seasons they had by being completely alone. Granted, he didn't have Wade or Bosch to lean on while in Cleveland, but the results with his own game are eerily similar.

Right. The reason they don't bring that up is because he didn't play alone (that would just be silly). He played with the worst teammates in the NBA. Playing alone might have been better.

Before Lebron came into the league, Cleveland was 17-65. Three years later, they are 50-32. They make the playoffs for 5 years in a row, and were the #1 team in 2009 and 2010. The absolute moment he leaves, this very year, they went from 61-21 to 19-63.

Nobody does that. Nobody falls that far. Nobody suddenly goes from 40 games over .500 to 44 UNDER in a year!!! That team was the worst "team" in the decade.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 13, 2011, 10:19:51 AM
Cleveland didn't just lose Lebron though, they lost their entire front line (Shaq, Big Z and Varejao), they were basically in tank mode the whole season.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 13, 2011, 11:01:50 AM
Hey Lebron, how does my Dirk taste? (http://ll-media.tmz.com/2011/06/13/0613-t-shirt-tmz-ex-wm-2-credit.jpg)


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 11:26:38 AM
It's strange because LeBron was amazing in the fourth quarter when he played for Cleveland. I have no idea what happened to him this year. To me it would indicate it's more growing pains than he lacks some kind of mental fortitude needed to be clutch. They had the big show at the beginning of the year which made everyone think "championship or bust" but the way they talked all year about how they still need to learn to play as a team makes me think that privately they still think they had a great year and they proved they can make it to the finals and now they just need to seal the deal.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 13, 2011, 11:29:53 AM
Lebron was amazing in the fourth quarter against Boston and Chicago THIS YEAR.  He just disappears completely when the stage gets big.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Morfiend on June 13, 2011, 12:19:42 PM
I think Colin Cowherd had it right. Guys with good fathers in their lives make the best superstars in the NBA. Guys that didn't have that always seem to lack the maturity necessary to get to that pinnacle.

Lebron lacks a lot of the maturity he needs, even his is post-game interviews, to be a "cold-iron" player.

I listen to Cowherd in the mornings on my drive to work sometimes, and this guy while very sports savvy seems to have the same problem a lot of the "lebron lovers" have. They don't understand why people dont like him. They (Cowherd and others) always say "why do people hate Lebron for leaving Cleaveland" and to that I respond "We dont hate Lebron for leaving, we hate him for the way he left".

Also, I think Lebron is the greatest physical player in the NBA right now. As in pure physical talent. Its his mental game thats holding him back. I'm pretty happy Dallas won.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 12:24:16 PM
Lebron was amazing in the fourth quarter against Boston and Chicago THIS YEAR.  He just disappears completely when the stage gets big.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1Px-jPm_TU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc0b73xeSYg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c4l8LW_ebw


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 13, 2011, 12:38:50 PM
Uh what are those videos supposed to prove? Lebron destroyed Detroit then got swept by the Spurs, he lost against Orlando and Boston.  You are basically just reinforcing exactly what i said.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on June 13, 2011, 12:40:01 PM
Seems like you have a pretty arbitrary definition of when the stage is 'big' or not. He made it farther this year, after all.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 13, 2011, 01:07:17 PM
But it's not my definition that matters, it is his.  He keeps getting to a level where he seems to go "oh god i don't want to do this anymore" and checks out.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: 01101010 on June 13, 2011, 01:14:22 PM
Seems like you have a pretty arbitrary definition of when the stage is 'big' or not. He made it farther this year, after all.

So Wade and Bosch got him 2 more games than before - still no ring though.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 01:18:14 PM
But it's not my definition that matters, it is his.  He keeps getting to a level where he seems to go "oh god i don't want to do this anymore" and checks out.

Armchair psychology?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 13, 2011, 01:24:37 PM
I listen to Cowherd in the mornings on my drive to work sometimes, and this guy while very sports savvy seems to have the same problem a lot of the "lebron lovers" have. They don't understand why people dont like him. They (Cowherd and others) always say "why do people hate Lebron for leaving Cleaveland" and to that I respond "We dont hate Lebron for leaving, we hate him for the way he left".

Also, I think Lebron is the greatest physical player in the NBA right now. As in pure physical talent. Its his mental game thats holding him back. I'm pretty happy Dallas won.

I think he gets it, but he thinks that's a ridiculous reason. He's stated as such. He compared it to "it's not what you said, it's how you said it" that you get from women sometimes. He's about perspective and results, which is a good thing for a national sports analyst. Local markets put very little emphasis on either. My only problem is that he's an obvious contrarian, even though he says he's not. He could never admit it, of course, but the secret to grabbing interest is to go against the grain in sports if you can back it up with fact.

I'm happy Dallas won because I grew up there. I'm by no means a fan and won't pretend that I jumped on the bandwagon. Still it's nice to finally have some remote connection with success for a guy like Jason Kidd that I can remember playing for the Mavs when I was still in grade school.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on June 13, 2011, 01:35:05 PM
with success for a guy like Jason Kidd that I can remember playing for the Mavs when I was still in grade school.
:ye_gods:


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 01:44:03 PM
I think he gets it, but he thinks that's a ridiculous reason. He's stated as such. He compared it to "it's not what you said, it's how you said it" that you get from women sometimes. He's about perspective and results, which is a good thing for a national sports analyst. Local markets put very little emphasis on either. My only problem is that he's an obvious contrarian, even though he says he's not. He could never admit it, of course, but the secret to grabbing interest is to go against the grain in sports if you can back it up with fact.

I'm happy Dallas won because I grew up there. I'm by no means a fan and won't pretend that I jumped on the bandwagon. Still it's nice to finally have some remote connection with success for a guy like Jason Kidd that I can remember playing for the Mavs when I was still in grade school.

I like listening to Cowherd because he's an obvious contrarian."Golf is just Golf …and then when Tiger gets going, it’s like a sport!"


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Strazos on June 13, 2011, 03:18:57 PM
He's stated as such. He compared it to "it's not what you said, it's how you said it" that you get from women sometimes.

Just to confirm, we're in agreement that this is bullshit - that the how can sometimes matter more than the what...right?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Jeff Kelly on June 13, 2011, 03:40:11 PM
I'm rather sad that the NBA final is already only discussed in terms of the Heat and especially LeBron losing instead of that the Mavericks won.

It's like the Mavericks only won because LeBron sucked, belittling an awesome achievement by a team in the process.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 03:53:43 PM
It is depressing, isn't it. So can we say it now, Nowitzki is the best European player ever?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Strazos on June 13, 2011, 03:55:35 PM
I thought that went without saying?


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Azuredream on June 13, 2011, 04:00:26 PM
Dominique Wilkins maybe, but I don't know if that one really counts since he grew up in America even though he was born in France.

edit; and you might have had some people championing Pau Gasol if you asked them before the playoffs this year.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ingmar on June 13, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
(http://www.basketball-reference.com/images/players/marcisa01.jpg)


...OK not really.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Paelos on June 13, 2011, 04:17:08 PM
He's stated as such. He compared it to "it's not what you said, it's how you said it" that you get from women sometimes.

Just to confirm, we're in agreement that this is bullshit - that the how can sometimes matter more than the what...right?

It's not 100% no. Sometimes you can say something and be a complete dick about it when you just didn't have to. Most of the time though, it wouldn't matter how you said it if it's horrible news.

I personally don't think Cleveland would have been happy however he said it. I also don't think it would have been the national brand of hatred if he hadn't done it on TV like a dipshit.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Jeff Kelly on June 13, 2011, 04:19:44 PM
I wasn't aiming this at Dirk specifically.

It's just that it's somewhat insulting to what has clearly been an exceptional team effort all year. The Mavericks with Kidd, Michaels and Nowitzki basically achieved what people had hoped LeBron would do, win the championship in the right way. They emphasized what this game should be about - building a cohesive team, that uses the individual strengths  of each team member. Nowitzki wasn't that great in game 6 and his team mates picked up the slack turning what could have easily been a loss into a win, with a rather big lead at that.

Team spirit trumped ego and a team that that everybody before the finals thought would steamroll the Mavs.

Yet somehow this has already turned into a "If LeBron would have played better the Heat would have won" situation. I mean come on, we've had one player that had an injured hand and at one point  a fever and a cold (that could easily turn into cardiomyopathy or other serious health issues) and still gave all for his team and another player that choked because somehow the opposing players had the audacity to not roll over and die stunned by his legendary awesomeness and who even got upstaged by other players in his own team.

Hell Cuban was one of only two owners that voted against the move of the Sonics to Oklahoma which gives him an golden star in my book.

Ifs and buts don't win games and focusing so much about James gives off a vibe that Dallas somehow shouldn't have won if everything had went as it was supposed to be. Which is kind of insulting if you think about it.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: caladein on June 13, 2011, 04:24:33 PM
I thought that went without saying?

If you're just looking at NBA games, yeah, it's Dirk and then everyone else.  If you're looking at someone's full professional and international career when asking that, it's Dirk and Arvydas Sabonis and then everyone else.

Pau is a great player and could definitely make it a conversation as he's two years younger and his rate stats are in the same ballpark as Dirk's.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Jeff Kelly on June 13, 2011, 04:32:12 PM
Well to be fair as an European I'm always forgetting that switching teams is a lot less common in US sports than in other places. In international football it's rather common that players switch teams when contracts have expired. It's so common actually that no broadcast network would air a one hour special for any player even if hypothetically Pele, Beckenbauer or Ronaldo were the ones switching teams. Just look at how many teams a player like Beckham has played for during his career and if rumors are accurate he will add another station to that list when the Galaxy borrows him to Tottenham.

Yet for me it is one thing if you just leave and an entirely different thing to make a one hour national TV special out of your decision just so that you can publicly indulge in your own brand of narcissism and at the same time humiliate an entire city, region and fanbase.

It's the difference between telling your partner you're breaking up in private or telling him on Maury or Jerry Springer. You'll have hurt feelings either way but you'd have to be a major douchebag to add public humiliation before an entire nation to it.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Ozzu on June 13, 2011, 05:31:08 PM
Interesting graphic which I think puts Dirk's greatness in perspective:

(http://i.imgur.com/8f4mF.png)


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Cyrrex on June 14, 2011, 05:29:14 AM
That is fairly amazing.

What can't be taken away from Dallas is that they had a knack, through the whole post season, of withering their opponents away in the fourth quarter.  It didn't seem to matter that they were down by 10 to 15 points, they just seemed to keep coming back and winning anyway.  Lebron is a giant cock and I'm glad he lost, but Dallas earned that trophy, period.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 17, 2011, 04:18:45 AM
Stay soft Dirk Nowitzki (http://deadspin.com/5805082/)

Pretty good article about the media's perception on Dirk and his softness, and how the basketball media has always wanted players to be "tough".


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: Threash on June 17, 2011, 10:42:40 AM
Yeah, as much as i hate the Heat i think it is pretty ridiculous how much uhh... heat? Bosh gets for showing any emotion.  Grief, lets go with grief yeah.


Title: Re: NBA 2010
Post by: ghost on June 22, 2011, 01:57:18 PM
This should be an interesting draft, though not because of the draftees in particular.  The prospects other than the top five are pretty dismal.  This could turn out to be a 2000 type draft where the best player was Michael Redd, a second rounder.  What should be interesting is the trade talk.  They're already talking about dealing Tony Parker and I know that some other big names are liable to get thrown around.  I plan on watching this one for sure.  .