f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Gaming => Topic started by: schild on August 20, 2008, 05:57:49 AM



Title: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on August 20, 2008, 05:57:49 AM
Here. A thread for quick questions. Idea stolen from another board.

Great for things like: What graphics card should I buy right this moment? or Why r my power supply turning sparkly colors?

Anyway, my question:

Photoshop seems to not let me type in lower case anymore, anyone else ever run into this problem?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on August 20, 2008, 06:27:36 AM
That's an odd one.  Some font sets don't have lower case, AoC installed the Hyborian font on my computer and it is all upper.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on August 20, 2008, 06:30:28 AM
Times New Roman, Arial, etc - only upper case.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on August 20, 2008, 06:58:08 AM
You'd think that with all your decades of PC experience that you'd be able to troubleshoot a simple CAPS LOCK problem  :uhrr:

I could soooo work in tech support.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on August 20, 2008, 07:00:48 AM
OH MAN CAPS LOCK WAS ON.

No.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on August 20, 2008, 07:35:22 AM
I guess there are options in the paragraph and character palette pop ups that force all caps, one of the little icons.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 20, 2008, 08:18:57 AM
not super familiar with photoshop but in CS3 if you go to the text properties section there is a setting for all caps, sounds like you have that on. pic inc.

(http://www.devotia.com/img/pscaps.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 20, 2008, 08:26:58 AM
also shouldn't this be a board instead of a thread... Call it EBKC Troubleshooting or something

edit: and my question:

Is there a desktop FTP widget (or even a folder on my desktop) that will automagically upload files I drag and drop into it to a prespecified folder on my ftp server? 

Even better is there something like the above that provides immediate feedback in the form of a url for the most recently dropped file (for example just copying and pasting to a forum)?

It's annoying to fire up filezilla, connecting to my site, navigating to the img folder and dropping an image in. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 20, 2008, 09:30:26 AM
There's tons of drag-drop FTP programs. There was one I used for awhile a few years ago, but I don't remember the name anymore. Google (http://www.google.com/search?q=ftp+drag+drop).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 20, 2008, 09:43:19 AM
There's tons of drag-drop FTP programs. There was one I used for awhile a few years ago, but I don't remember the name anymore. Google (http://www.google.com/search?q=ftp+drag+drop).

sweet, before I hand over my FTP login information to randominternetprogram01 anyone have a recommendation that they have used? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on August 20, 2008, 01:58:27 PM
I use Fire FTP now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 20, 2008, 02:05:12 PM
sweet, before I hand over my FTP login information to randominternetprogram01 anyone have a recommendation that they have used? 

Chicken. I hope anything sensitive on an FTP server is behind your firewall anyways.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 20, 2008, 03:12:58 PM
sweet, before I hand over my FTP login information to randominternetprogram01 anyone have a recommendation that they have used? 

Chicken. I hope anything sensitive on an FTP server is behind your firewall anyways.  :awesome_for_real:

You mean my $15 a month web server that I have no real control over? 

Not quite sure how much good the firewall would be against someone having your username and password and using that info to illegitimately create legitimate traffic...  I suppose IP restriction on FTP requests but that isn't a very good solution for roaming and/or masked IP's.

There isn't anything critical on that server but it might be slightly embarrassing if it was hacked and loaded with malicious content.

Fire FTP looks okay but i'm not really looking to replace Filezilla, ftpdropper (http://www.stilleye.com/ftpdropper/) looks about like what I wanted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 20, 2008, 03:41:42 PM
Yah there's not much you can do about that. You get what you pay for.

FTP is notorious for being easily hacked/cracked, even without the help of suspect FTP programs. Most organizations (such as the one I work for) do not allow FTP outside of the internal network, blocking all external traffic on the common FTP ports. Heck, I think everything is blocked except for the VPN connection.

Here's my question:

What's a good app to use to configure dual monitors in Windows Vista? Such as having your taskbar in both windows?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on August 20, 2008, 03:42:32 PM
Ultramon.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 20, 2008, 03:43:34 PM
Ah ha! I knew one of you knew the one I knew I was looking for.....         Knew.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 20, 2008, 04:04:05 PM
While on the subject of dual monitors, can anyone confirm that vista sp1 remote desktop supports viewing both of them?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 06, 2008, 12:01:23 PM
So what graphics card should I buy right this moment? I'll be replacing an NVIDIA 8600. Want to spend $300-$400.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 06, 2008, 12:01:45 PM
4870


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 06, 2008, 12:07:17 PM
Yeah, but there are so many. :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 06, 2008, 12:08:55 PM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814129113


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 06, 2008, 03:52:16 PM
Sweet, thanks Schild.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 07, 2008, 09:38:49 AM
Kinda a tech question, but does anyone here have inside info on when Newegg plans to open in Canada? Their "teaser" site went up a month ago.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 07, 2008, 10:56:22 AM
No, but I've been using 1click2computers.com, and have had only good experiences so far. Not as polished as newegg, but fast service and good prices. Based out of Mississauga.

There's also directdail.com in Canada. I've heard good things about them, but I haven't used them myself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 07, 2008, 11:33:53 AM
Thanks! I'm right next to Mississauga, so that works out better.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 15, 2008, 02:17:24 PM
pc800 Ram, i hope for at least a gig (2 x 512)


Cheap? Suggestions on where to buy? Snarky comments?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 15, 2008, 02:29:54 PM
http://www.pricewatch.com/system_memory/pc800_512mb.htm (http://www.pricewatch.com/system_memory/pc800_512mb.htm)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 15, 2008, 04:06:00 PM
pc800 Ram, i hope for at least a gig (2 x 512)

Cheap? Suggestions on where to buy? Snarky comments?

Ditch the rambus based board and buy something not so OLD?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lt.Dan on September 15, 2008, 08:04:44 PM
pc800 Ram, i hope for at least a gig (2 x 512)


Cheap? Suggestions on where to buy? Snarky comments?

If you live in Australia I've got some 256 sticks you can have.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lt.Dan on September 15, 2008, 08:06:49 PM
I'm looking at buying a wireless keyboard and mouse to use with HTPC.  Ideally I'd like both to have cradles for recharging and a keyboard without the numeric key pad.  Small and dainty would be nice but I ain't paying double to get it.  Budget (since Trippy always wants to know) would be ~$US100 but 20 bucks over wouldn't kill me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 15, 2008, 08:13:46 PM
the wireless keyboard and mouse I have by Logitech doesn't hog batteries very badly. Have to replace them every two months or so. Its not worth cutting down your options just to have them be rechargeable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 16, 2008, 07:49:21 AM
I'm almost embarassed to ask something that probably seems so obvious to most of you, but...

I have Comcast cable and an HD DVR in my family room.  In my office I have, obviously, my PC and other equipment (consoles, projector, etc.).  I am looking for this particular piece of advice:  What is the best/cheapest/easiest way for me to get full blown HD cable via my PC?  I know I could rent a new tuner from Comcast, but I'm thinking that it probably isn't cost effective.  Will any old HD DVR or HD Tuner card hooked up to cable ultimately net the same effect (and same channels)?  Note that I do not want to sign up for any new subscriptions to make this happen.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 16, 2008, 07:51:55 AM
pc800 Ram, i hope for at least a gig (2 x 512)

Cheap? Suggestions on where to buy? Snarky comments?

Ditch the rambus based board and buy something not so OLD?

Already did, but i can get at lest another year or two of gaming out of the Rambus one, if i can find more sticks.  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 16, 2008, 08:14:41 AM
I'm looking at buying a wireless keyboard and mouse to use with HTPC.  Ideally I'd like both to have cradles for recharging and a keyboard without the numeric key pad.  Small and dainty would be nice but I ain't paying double to get it.  Budget (since Trippy always wants to know) would be ~$US100 but 20 bucks over wouldn't kill me.
Just don't get the Logitech bluetooth dealios. I have one, and truly regret it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 16, 2008, 08:38:29 AM
I'm almost embarassed to ask something that probably seems so obvious to most of you, but...

I have Comcast cable and an HD DVR in my family room.  In my office I have, obviously, my PC and other equipment (consoles, projector, etc.).  I am looking for this particular piece of advice:  What is the best/cheapest/easiest way for me to get full blown HD cable via my PC?  I know I could rent a new tuner from Comcast, but I'm thinking that it probably isn't cost effective.  Will any old HD DVR or HD Tuner card hooked up to cable ultimately net the same effect (and same channels)?  Note that I do not want to sign up for any new subscriptions to make this happen.
Best/cheapest/easiest are all mutually exclusive so you need to pick one. And actually as far as I've been able to figure out so far there is no "easiest" either.

The simplistic answer is that there are number of solutions out there that will allow you to capture QAM cable (i.e. unencrypted digital cable) including HD QAM channels, assuming they are available in your area. In theory with a QAM capture device and the appropriate software you can capture said channels. However as I've been discovering in practice it's anything but straightforward.

If you want to capture encrypted HD programming (like, say, HBO) that's a whole other area that I haven't even bothered to look into yet but would presumably require being able to capture component output assuming your cable box can even output that.

If you have a couple hundred bucks to spend you could try messing around with something like this:

http://www.amazon.com/Hauppauge-1192-HVR-1950-External-Recorder/dp/B00198MYB0

There are cheaper QAM HDTV capture devices out there but it's less likely one of the popular 3rd party PVR software programs will support the hardware, unlike the Hauppauge stuff which is really well supported.

Expect a lot of pain and suffering, though, if you attempt to do this. I'm still suffering through getting my Comcast Digital Cable setup to work acceptably and I may never actually get to that point. Which is unfortunate since my previous ATSC (over the air) HDTV setup worked really well for the channels I was able to receive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 16, 2008, 08:50:23 AM
Quote
Best/cheapest/easiest are all mutually exclusive so you need to pick one.

I knew that, was just being deliberately thick.  Based on what you're saying, and upon some of the reviews I've read, I may just re-consider renting another box from comcast and hooking it up directly to my projector.  I'd frankly be pretty pissed if I had to spend 150 bucks to find out it didn't work for shit.  And to be fair, the HD box from comcast is decent enough....it's more the long term cost that gives me pause.

I don't know if this changes anything, but I don't do premium channels, so I assume all the stuff I am getting is unencrypted.

Edit:  come to think of it, that is probably a poor assumption, since it isn't simple basic cable that I have.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 16, 2008, 08:56:24 AM
I don't know if this changes anything, but I don't do premium channels, so I assume all the stuff I am getting is unencrypted.
Nope. The only digital channels the law requires the cable company to send unencrypted are the local stations (local affliates of FOX, NBC, CBS, PBS, etc.). Where I am I get those (in both SD and HD) and a ton of other crap SD digital channels like the shopping channels in QAM. I don't get any of the "Starter Package" HD channels in QAM, at least as far as I've been able to determine so far.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 16, 2008, 09:00:39 AM
I'm looking at buying a wireless keyboard and mouse to use with HTPC.  Ideally I'd like both to have cradles for recharging and a keyboard without the numeric key pad.  Small and dainty would be nice but I ain't paying double to get it.  Budget (since Trippy always wants to know) would be ~$US100 but 20 bucks over wouldn't kill me.
Just don't get the Logitech bluetooth dealios. I have one, and truly regret it.

I have had some dicey luck with wireless kb/mouse combos (all logitech).  In my experience if you want to go more than 4 or so feet without problems you have to go blue tooth.  For my conference room at work I bought a logitech cordless desktop (mx1000 laser mouse+keyboard)  this wasn't bluetooth and the lack of range made it suck.  So I brought it home and while the keyboard still sucked (lag) the mouse rocked.  For work I then purchased the logitech bluetooth bundle, the mouse isn't as good as the mx1000 and there is still some keyboard lage but the range is pretty impressive, unfortunately it still has the smallest bit of lag.

Now the dell bluetooth kb/mouse bundle (pretty much include it for everyone who asks me to order them a laptop) are pretty snappy (no lag) but the mouse feels a little light and they take batteries instead of having a built in charger.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 16, 2008, 09:03:47 AM
I don't know if this changes anything, but I don't do premium channels, so I assume all the stuff I am getting is unencrypted.
Nope. The only digital channels the law requires the cable company to send unencrypted are the local stations (local affliates of FOX, NBC, CBS, PBS, etc.). Where I am I get those (in both SD and HD) and a ton of other crap SD digital channels like the shopping channels in QAM. I don't get any of the "Starter Package" HD channels in QAM, at least as far as I've been able to determine so far.


Thanks Trippy, that clears it up for me quite well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 16, 2008, 11:34:54 AM
I'm looking at buying a wireless keyboard and mouse to use with HTPC.  Ideally I'd like both to have cradles for recharging and a keyboard without the numeric key pad.  Small and dainty would be nice but I ain't paying double to get it.  Budget (since Trippy always wants to know) would be ~$US100 but 20 bucks over wouldn't kill me.
Just don't get the Logitech bluetooth dealios. I have one, and truly regret it.

I have had some dicey luck with wireless kb/mouse combos (all logitech).  In my experience if you want to go more than 4 or so feet without problems you have to go blue tooth.  For my conference room at work I bought a logitech cordless desktop (mx1000 laser mouse+keyboard)  this wasn't bluetooth and the lack of range made it suck.  So I brought it home and while the keyboard still sucked (lag) the mouse rocked.  For work I then purchased the logitech bluetooth bundle, the mouse isn't as good as the mx1000 and there is still some keyboard lage but the range is pretty impressive, unfortunately it still has the smallest bit of lag.

Now the dell bluetooth kb/mouse bundle (pretty much include it for everyone who asks me to order them a laptop) are pretty snappy (no lag) but the mouse feels a little light and they take batteries instead of having a built in charger.
Guess I'd better elaborate. I also have the mx1000. My problems are
  • Periodically, the keyboard disconnects, reconnects 5 seconds or so later. That behaviour is totally incompatible with gaming.
  • Occasional monster keyboard lag
  • Occasionally, on boot up, mouse and keyboard aren't recognized at all, need to reboot
  • Finicky connector between mouse and charger
  • Ferocious battery use on keyboard.
I won't be buying another of these.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 16, 2008, 11:41:56 AM
Those sound like problems with Bluetooth to me.  I had that with my PS3 controllers for a while, but seems to have cleared up now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 16, 2008, 11:47:03 AM
Well um, yeah. :grin:

But I'm using Logitech's bluetooth tranceiver and Logitech's bluetooth stack, so there's really only one source to blame.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 16, 2008, 12:03:02 PM
Pretty much same experience i had with it, i gave the wireless keybard to my 2 year old and went out and bought a g15 (should have bought a g11).  The mouse though is hands down the best mouse i have owned and has held up well to 3 years of abuse (1 of it's lil glide pad/feet wore off though). 

Too bad they replaced the mx1000 mouse with that newfangled piece of crap that is 2x the size and seems to weigh half as much.  Maybe it's just me but my brain and hand don't seem to be evolving fast enough to keep up with the logitech pace for adding new scrollies and buttons.  I seem to recall a similar feeling when they replaced my easy to click middle button with a hard to click wheelie a decade ago so I guess I'll eventually evolve enough to make a thumb wheel indispensable


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 16, 2008, 03:20:43 PM
My school uses XPRINT for printing. I had an issue with it last year because of a non Dell install of XP being on my laptop which was fixed with a format and Dell install. I re-formatted again and used the same Dell CD and now XPRINT refuses to work again. Any ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 16, 2008, 03:22:04 PM
My school uses XPRINT for printing. I had an issue with it last year because of a non Dell install of XP being on my laptop which was fixed with a format and Dell install. I re-formatted again and used the same Dell CD and now XPRINT refuses to work again. Any ideas?
Be more specific.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 16, 2008, 05:16:43 PM
XPRINT refuses to work again

This section needs elaboration.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: hal on September 16, 2008, 06:00:39 PM
My sub woofer has burned out or something. I am running XP (32) Creative sound card. I am a deaf man but I miss my lump ba dump ( deaf people like bass) . Please to be recommending some speakers with big sub woofers. Current system was surround sound and i think that a satellite with subwoffer is preferred.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 16, 2008, 07:14:39 PM
I get the error "\\xprint - The network path was not found" when I type \\xprint in RUN.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 16, 2008, 10:21:47 PM
I get the error "\\xprint - The network path was not found" when I type \\xprint in RUN.
I know nothing about xpring but how is Windows supposed to know what network resource \\xprint maps to? Is there some sort of directory service that maps that name to the actual device/resource? Or do you have to add an entry to your hosts or other network config file?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 17, 2008, 05:30:40 AM
No idea, to be honest, but I'd assume it has to do with us being connected to the school network when it finds XPRINT. There's 0 documentation through the school, and google knows nothing of XPRINT.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 17, 2008, 05:41:54 AM
My sub woofer has burned out or something. I am running XP (32) Creative sound card. I am a deaf man but I miss my lump ba dump ( deaf people like bass) . Please to be recommending some speakers with big sub woofers. Current system was surround sound and i think that a satellite with subwoffer is preferred.

Not sure how big you need to go, but I have this Klipsch 2.1 setup that seems to be pretty good bang for the buck (can be had for under 150).  In a relatively small room, I get a pretty impressive bass response.  It is only a stereo set, mind you. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2008, 06:19:18 AM
No idea, to be honest, but I'd assume it has to do with us being connected to the school network when it finds XPRINT.

Are you saying that this works when you are on the school network but does not work when you are not?  I'd have you check the name to see how you are reaching it when it is working... possibly you are not resolving the name anymore and if you can determine the IP it might help.  After that, though, you need to see if you can actually hit the IP.  I'm not really a network guy, or a Windows guy, so I'm going to be of limited help.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 17, 2008, 07:00:47 AM
I need a solid workstation for my wife.  My old gaming rig just crapped out. 

I'm thinking that putting one together isn't going to be that much cheaper than just buying a Dell, plus they get to deal with the headaches when she breaks it just by looking at it. 

Anyone know who is putting out solid, simple (cheap) workstations? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2008, 07:38:31 AM
I'd get a Dell for that, assuming she isn't doing the pee-pee dance for The Sims 3.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 17, 2008, 07:59:57 AM
I need a solid workstation for my wife.  My old gaming rig just crapped out. 

I'm thinking that putting one together isn't going to be that much cheaper than just buying a Dell, plus they get to deal with the headaches when she breaks it just by looking at it. 

Anyone know who is putting out solid, simple (cheap) workstations? 
HP/Compaq.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 17, 2008, 08:41:32 AM
Trippy, what's the story there? My experience with HP/Compaq in the past has been dubious. Have they cleaned up their act?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 17, 2008, 08:44:33 AM
It's more that Dell has totally destroyed their once stellar support reputation by outsourcing it to India. I.e. they've fallen to the level of other companies like HP.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on September 17, 2008, 08:55:22 AM
I've bought a number of HP desktops for the guys here at work over the last years, and have had no problems with them. I cannot comment on the quality of their service, since we haven't needed to use it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 17, 2008, 10:16:04 AM
Thanks, all.  I'll price check all three.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 17, 2008, 12:05:34 PM
XPRINT error fixed! They have us register our laptops (my program is a 'mobile' program where we all have to have laptops) and because I originally bought my laptop before we actually had to they decided to undo my registration. Yay! :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 17, 2008, 12:29:58 PM
What the hell is XPRINT?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 17, 2008, 01:46:53 PM
Dual core Or core 2 duo?

Price seems to vary a good deal...but whats the difference?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 17, 2008, 02:20:50 PM
Dual core Or core 2 duo?

Price seems to vary a good deal...but whats the difference?
Give some examples.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 17, 2008, 05:43:16 PM
What the hell is XPRINT?
You don't know what XPRINT is?! ... Neither do I. Wiki has a cryptic entry though (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xprint)!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2008, 06:51:43 PM
What the hell is XPRINT?
You don't know what XPRINT is?! ... Neither do I. Wiki has a cryptic entry though (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xprint)!

I have a strong suspicion that you are using some other XPRINT, partly because that link is for Xprint, not XPRINT, and also I really don't think you are using X11.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 17, 2008, 08:41:14 PM
I have a strong suspicion that you are using some other XPRINT, partly because that link is for Xprint, not XPRINT, and also I really don't think you are using X11.
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31tpiMvNldL._SL500_.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 17, 2008, 10:01:39 PM
It's more that Dell has totally destroyed their once stellar support reputation by outsourcing it to India. I.e. they've fallen to the level of other companies like HP.


It may depend on the level of support you're talking about. I have to replace failed Dell parts on a nearly weekly basis here at work, and their Dell Chat system works like a charm. It doesn't matter if the dude is Indian on the other end of the line, as long as I can explain why the component is truely dead and the machine is still under warranty, I get a replacement within 14-20 hours of the conversation.

Now, I've never had to make any tech support call where I had to actually troubleshoot an item, or had to have a replacement sent for a 'home' purchase I've made, so I can't speak to that, but at a business/government level, they are bar none the best I've ever worked with.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2008, 08:18:51 AM
Dual core Or core 2 duo?

Price seems to vary a good deal...but whats the difference?
Give some examples.


Ok, what i am doing is ditching the idea of upgrading the old DELL (RAMBUS!!!1!).

Now, i need a processor for my girls machine, but i am confused as to what Core 2 duo, and Dual core's differences are. I will link some from new egg.

Dual core (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340343%201051707842%201050729314&name=Dual-Core) Search refinement.

Core 2 duo (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340343%201051707842%201302820275%201050722265&name=Core%202%20Duo) search refinement.

Now, i realize Mhz are Mhz and some are just faster. BUT! some of the dual core CPU's are not that far behind in Mhz, but the price difference is large.

Now, what i need is a decent CPU for my girls machine, something that will allow her to play games like LOTRO and WAR...and what ever else, she doesn't ever have a want to play anything as intensive as oblivion ETC..

So, is dual core a good CPU for the price? or should i spend a little more for the Core 2 duo.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 18, 2008, 08:23:38 AM
The Core 2 Duo's are still two cores, not 4.

The only difference I see is that they aren't making many Dual Core's anymore, and the Core 2 Duo's have 2mb cache instead of the 1mb cache that Dual Core's have.

edit: some of the Core 2 Duo's are 45nm instead of 65nm, but those are the really pricey ones (200+). The ones down at the bottom of $100 (say, $120) are about the same as the Dual Core's but with twice the cache.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2008, 08:32:13 AM
Yeah, i know they are still two cores, hence my confusion, And what does the cache mean to me? (other than more is better)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 18, 2008, 08:40:57 AM
More cache = more data processing at once, so if you are doing things with large files (ie: playing intensive games, editing videos, etc) then more is better. Personally, I would splurge and get at least one of the Core 2 Duos, if not one of the 45mn ones. For your gf the Dual Core is probably fine, as the real bottleneck is going to be the graphics card for LOTRO. A lot of the game stuff uses the video cards GPU instead of the CPU now days, so the CPU is becoming less important for video games.

It's always best to get the best you can afford, so you aren't upgrading as often. So I would start with what you want to spend then work backwards and see what you can afford. I start with the most important piece of hardware then move backwards:

Video Card
CPU
Mobo
Memory

So if you are doing a total upgrade and you want to spend $1000 or less, see what you can get in the first slot that's 1 or 2 slots below "The Best(tm)" then work it through and tweak as needed or you see deals.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2008, 08:53:42 AM
YEah, thanks for the advice, but i have already done that part lol, right now i am trying to get the overall price down. As far as video card, i had already chosen This one. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130318) (I currently use this on my new machine i bought about 2 months ago)

I may just list the whole machine as a public wish list, and let you guys go over it to make sure i'm not buying stupid things. But, what i was thinking is, buy the dual core, and upgrade it later (the slot allows for it)


EDIT: I need to figure out how to make it public, lol.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 18, 2008, 08:58:20 AM
Feel free to post the whole thing, at least one of us will be bored enough to go over it.  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 18, 2008, 04:18:13 PM
Dual core Or core 2 duo?

Price seems to vary a good deal...but whats the difference?
Give some examples.

Ok, what i am doing is ditching the idea of upgrading the old DELL (RAMBUS!!!1!).

Now, i need a processor for my girls machine, but i am confused as to what Core 2 duo, and Dual core's differences are. I will link some from new egg.

Dual core (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340343%201051707842%201050729314&name=Dual-Core) Search refinement.

Core 2 duo (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340343%201051707842%201302820275%201050722265&name=Core%202%20Duo) search refinement.

Now, i realize Mhz are Mhz and some are just faster. BUT! some of the dual core CPU's are not that far behind in Mhz, but the price difference is large.

Now, what i need is a decent CPU for my girls machine, something that will allow her to play games like LOTRO and WAR...and what ever else, she doesn't ever have a want to play anything as intensive as oblivion ETC..

So, is dual core a good CPU for the price? or should i spend a little more for the Core 2 duo.
"dual core" is a generic term meaning 2 CPU cores inside a single package. "Intel Pentium Dual-Core" is an Intel brand name for their low-end Core 2 Duo CPUs. Why they went back to using the Pentium name even though it's really a Core CPU I have no idea.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 19, 2008, 06:18:10 AM
Isn't the i7 coming out in a month or 2 at a reasonable price? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 19, 2008, 06:41:32 AM
Depends on what you mean by reasonable and what Intel launches with.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 19, 2008, 06:56:02 AM
So, your recommendation is... Get the core 2 duo over the dual core?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 19, 2008, 07:12:27 AM
Depends on your budget. The "Pentium Dual-Core" is a Core 2 Duo (if you say "dual core" that's too ambiguous, you could be referring to an AMD CPU for all we know), it's just on the low-end.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 19, 2008, 07:45:26 AM
Will it be up to the task of running the games i had listed? I know i can upgrade later, but if the chip is ass performance wise (Even if Hrtz match), then id rather spend the extra 40$ for the better performance.

I am choosing from the Newegg lists i posted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 19, 2008, 08:29:10 AM
Well it's hard to say since the usual sites typically don't bother benchmarking such low end CPUs, at least not in a way that's useful for comparison to other more expensive CPUs. Tom's probably has the most extensive CPU charts here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2008/benchmarks,16.html

but they don't benchmark the E2200 or the E4500 (i.e. the E2200 with 2 MB of cache). On the TH charts probably the closest equivalent to the E2200 is the Intel Core 2 Duo E6400.

It's also going to depend a lot of the resolution she's going to run the games at and the video card you are getting.

If it was up to me and I was building a budget system and I wasn't going to overclock and I had to get something right now I'd spend a little extra and go with the E7200 over the E2200.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Aez on September 22, 2008, 01:38:26 PM
OK, quick question :

Where do you start?

I have a recurring and really annoying bug that survived a window reinstall,  I'm guessing it's an hardware problem but I can't determine which part is broken.  I don't think it's my videocard, it's the first I returned but the bug stayed with a new card.  I'm thinking about switching my motherboard.

I can try to describe the problem for your amusement, it's a weird non repeatable bug but after 1 year of tolerating it I think I found a pattern.

My machine :
Motherboard : M2N-SLI deluxe
CPU : AMD Atlhon 64 x2 dual core processor 4200+
RAM : 2,21 GHz, 2 GB
videocard : nvidia geforce 7900 GT/GTO

The bug/problem :

Videoflash image freeze when I watch a movie, it unfreeze if I right click anywhere on the screen, the whole screen goes black for 1sec and the video continue like nothing happenned.

I think I freeze too much when I play videogame. I get tons of crash to desktop in spore, complete crash in bioshock, complete crash in Team fortress.  The weirdest part is when I reboot my computer after a complete crash, I get an infinite loading screen for window, starting in safe mode doesn't work.  Sometime I get a : can't find disk error press ctrl + alt + del.  If I wait 5 min before I restart, everything is fine again...  I think I have decent cooling, my case is top notch.
An other weird part is that a game only run normally the first time, if I close it I have to restart window before I play it again or I get glitches and a flickering screen in game.

I tried to get some solutions from random google question but nothing work.  I haven't even found a single thing talking about the videoflash problem.


What would you do?  Is it worth the bother of changing my motherboard has a blind shot in the dark?  Any suggestion?  This kind of problem will probably cost more to fix by a professional than a new computer.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 22, 2008, 03:32:04 PM
I've seen/heard many horror stories about the m2n-sli deluxe. Seems Asus never really got all the bugs out of the design. And the onboard sound appears to have a number of issues.

Check (a fingertip will work) heat on the heatsink on the mcp, and mosfets after it crashes. With the computer shut off but before it has time to cool. The cpu isn't the only thing that can cause heat problems.
Also check to see what voltage your memory requires, and how much you're providing to it. And run memtest86.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 22, 2008, 03:37:05 PM
Hard to track down stuff like that. First thing I'd do is disable the onboard sound via the device manager.. see if that helps any. Also make sure you have updated drivers, etc. Voltage to memory is also important, especially if you have cheap memory.

Might be worth it to buy a new mobo and pay attention to the return policy. You could try a new one see if it helps after running some stuff hard (TF2, etc) and return it if it doesn't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 22, 2008, 05:12:56 PM
Might try a BIOS flash, but that should come after other ideas and before "buy a new mobo".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Aez on September 22, 2008, 05:35:14 PM
I flashed my bios today, it said it couldn't complete the flash but all the hardware autodetected after a reboot and the updater is now telling me I have the new  version.  I'm not seeing any noticeable change.

With the setting I posted above, anyone could recommend a stable motherboard?  Throw in the price tag if you can, I'll google it otherwise.

I haven't done any hardware stuff beside changing a videocard and adding some ram.  I'm guessing I should go to a computer store and pay for an install?


It's too bad Vista is such a POS.  I was waiting on it to double the ram and fix my problem.  That would have been easy, cheap and in my skill range.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 22, 2008, 05:35:57 PM
A friend of mine was having weird problems with his computer (random shutdowns and weirdness when playing games) that was fixed (so far) by replacing his memory modules with better quality sticks rather than bargain basement ones. Might be something to try, it would be pretty cheap to buy a new set of mem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Aez on September 22, 2008, 05:55:27 PM
Thx. Worth a try, and I can return them if it doesn't work.  It might be a RAM problem since a memory optimizer program has a direct impact on my problems.  Any suggestion?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 22, 2008, 06:03:50 PM
what is this 'memory optimizer' program? That sounds wonky to start with. I also vote for ram, or video memory. How many sticks of ram do you have in the board? Use one, run memtest86 on a bootable CD, then if that passes, swap it out and use the other.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Aez on September 22, 2008, 07:20:18 PM
this one (http://pc-system-utilities-software-review.toptenreviews.com/advanced-system-optimizer-review.html)
I didn't reinstall it after my window reinstall, the impact wasn't good enough.  It did prevent my from having to right click my mouse everytime videoflash bug.

I'll try that test memtest86, looks hard to do.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 22, 2008, 07:41:40 PM
not really. its a sinch.

http://www.memtest86.com/download.html

download ISO. Burn ISO to blank CD. Boot to CD. Run test. Buncha lines start flowing as it runs some test. If the bottom 2/3rds of the screen fill up with screaming red columns of numbers, your memory is kaput. Most bad memory sticks only take a minute to discover, if not seconds. Rarely, memory problems are more subtle and take hours for memtest86 to discover.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 23, 2008, 08:05:23 AM
I have always had good luck with ASUS mobos and I have stuck with them for a few years, so I don't know.  If you memory test comes clean, I'd still suggest ASUS.  If you need new RAM, the recommendation is always Crucial.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on September 25, 2008, 04:05:04 AM
I've been lucky enough to recieve a small bit of money recently so I can now most likely get a new PC like I had been planning to for a while. The last time I looked about and got some advice here was a few of months ago from memory. I'll be looking to get the PC before the end of October (end of Uni and Fallout 3) and was wondering if much has changed recently and if waiting a few more weeks would have any influence on price and the like.

My plans back in early July looked like this: http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=12985.msg473043#msg473043

Prices don't seem to have changed much since then here in Australia. I can probably spend a little bit more if it represents significantly better value for money.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 25, 2008, 04:54:36 AM
Depends if you want to wait for Nehalem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Aez on September 25, 2008, 01:10:47 PM
not really. its a sinch.

http://www.memtest86.com/download.html

download ISO. Burn ISO to blank CD. Boot to CD. Run test. Buncha lines start flowing as it runs some test. If the bottom 2/3rds of the screen fill up with screaming red columns of numbers, your memory is kaput. Most bad memory sticks only take a minute to discover, if not seconds. Rarely, memory problems are more subtle and take hours for memtest86 to discover.

Ok, so I ran the test, my memory is perfect...  I did both stick at once.  I figured out I could do one at a time if I had any error.  I hope it's a valid reasoning.

I'm reinstalling again, I'll try it with out any window update. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on September 25, 2008, 04:34:19 PM
Depends if you want to wait for Nehalem.

All I could see is late 2008, 4thQ 2008 and such. Which I assume means it won't be here in Australia within the next couple of months. So I guess I'll just go for the same as earlier.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 25, 2008, 04:48:11 PM
Last I read it'll be available sometime in October. Dunno what sort of delay that translates into for Australia.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 26, 2008, 11:59:46 AM
not really. its a sinch.

http://www.memtest86.com/download.html

download ISO. Burn ISO to blank CD. Boot to CD. Run test. Buncha lines start flowing as it runs some test. If the bottom 2/3rds of the screen fill up with screaming red columns of numbers, your memory is kaput. Most bad memory sticks only take a minute to discover, if not seconds. Rarely, memory problems are more subtle and take hours for memtest86 to discover.

Ok, so I ran the test, my memory is perfect...  I did both stick at once.  I figured out I could do one at a time if I had any error.  I hope it's a valid reasoning.

I'm reinstalling again, I'll try it with out any window update. 
[emphasis mine]
It's not. At the very least, remove your sticks and reverse the order to retest. And passing Memtest86 doesn't mean your memory is good, it just means it passed memtest86.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 26, 2008, 09:42:27 PM
And passing Memtest86 doesn't mean your memory is good, it just means it passed memtest86.

Mind explaining rather than proclaiming from on high? Memtest86 sends data to all memory areas on a stick, in various patterns that cover just about every which way an OS reads and writes to memory blocks. I'm prepared to hear of a way that an OS taxes memory in a way that memtest86 can't reproduce within reason.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 26, 2008, 10:00:55 PM
From the FAQ:
Quote
Using Memtest
  -------------

  - How long does memtest run? How do I stop it?

    Memtest runs indefinately unless you stop it. It does however repeat the
    same tests over and over again. Memtest86+ contains a number of different
    tests which each take different approaches in trying to expose any errors
    in your memory. In the top right of your screen you can see the progress of
    each test in the lower of the two progress bars. The topmost progress bar
    shows the progress of a pass, each pass consists of all the tests in the
    memtest suite.

    Thus all tests are executed in one pass, so does that mean that no errors
    will show after the first pass if that pass didn't reveal any errors? Well
    no, there are several reasons why errors might only show up after a number
    of passes. Firstly as of this writing, the latest version of memtest also
    includes a test which uses random test patterns, each pass these patterns
    will of course be different. Secondly some types of errors simply don't show
    up until the system has been running for a while or are very critical on a
    certain timing condition, are thermal in nature, or other such conditions.

    To conclude, one successful pass of memtest will give you a pretty good
    idea that your memory is ok, only in rare cases will there be errors
    showing after the first pass. To be sure though simply have the test run
    overnight or even for a couple of days depending on the level of importance
    of the system.

  - Which memory is tested?

    As much as possible of the system memory is tested. Unfortunately memtest86+
    can usually not test all of the memory. The reason for this is that todays
    processors and BIOSes have become so complex that they require a small
    amount of memory to keep accounting data of the processor and BIOS state
    respectively. If memtest were to write over these areas the state of the
    processor or BIOS becomes invalid and it's behaviour unpredictable. Alas it
    is also impossible to relocate these areas in the memory.

    This means that a small area of your memory can not be tested by memtest.
    If this part of the memory is defective you will know soon enough though as
    the processor, parts of the processor or the BIOS simply won't work
    correctly if this part of your memory is defective. Do realise though that
    in very rare cases memtest will show no errors even though the module is
    defective, not because memtest can't detect the error, but because memtest
    can't test the area the error is located in.

Basically the longer you run memtest with the widest variety of tests and get no errors you asymptotically approach 100% certainity that your memory modules have no defects but you can never be 100% certain of that fact just from running memtest itself since memtest itself does not exactly simulate your machine under (ab)normal working conditions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 26, 2008, 10:42:24 PM
Ya, I hear you, but really, what are the odds of the exact part of memory that's broken is precisely the part that holds the bios/cpu data?  It also is probably a very very small amount of memory space to boot.

I mean, I guess everything is possible. I've seen file structures on a hard disk trashed and made to look like failing clusters when all that was going on was a failing block of video ram on a card that was mangling the living ell out of the data sent back to the GPU, which was in turn writing borked data to the disk.

I've seen an entire network multicast in Ghostcast server server crawl to 50 MB/min simply because some idiot (me) used a Sun network cable instead of a generic Cat5 cable on an entirely unrelated computer that happened to be plugged into one of the 8 switches in the network.

computers r hard mang


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 26, 2008, 10:56:55 PM
If you have two sticks you can swap them around to handle the BIOS/memory being used issue. The bigger uncertainity is this:
Quote
Secondly some types of errors simply don't show
up until the system has been running for a while or are very critical on a
certain timing condition, are thermal in nature, or other such conditions.
E.g. can you be certain that memtest replicates every timing condition in real-world operation?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 27, 2008, 09:56:17 AM
While I don't doubt for a moment that there are occasionally memory defects that only show when the sticks get to x temperature and the specific bad chip get hit with a specific pattern coming from a very specific type of data stream requireing a timing response that memtest86 can't duplicate, I would have to guess that they have to be rare.

At this stage, in relation to Aez problem, I would go back to Rattan's original suspicions about the motherboard. I'd check BIOS updates, and turn off on-board sound altogether. I would also perhaps check to see if there are any GPU ROM updates.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Aez on September 29, 2008, 06:13:19 PM
In a complete WTF outcome, simply removing and then putting back my RAM solved 90% of my problems...I didn't even switched them.  I hadn't moved them since I got the computer from the store.

WTF?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 29, 2008, 07:06:38 PM
Dust, corrosion, electromagnetic migration, elves.

Could be any of those. Reseating/reconnecting is never a bad idea when troubleshooting.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 29, 2008, 08:35:00 PM
In a complete WTF outcome, simply removing and then putting back my RAM solved 90% of my problems...I didn't even switched them.  I hadn't moved them since I got the computer from the store.

WTF?

Reseating sometimes is all you need.  Mazel tov!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on October 03, 2008, 05:53:33 AM
So I was looking at the rewards points on my credit card, and realized I had enough points to get an HD TV and a PS3, and still have points over. So the TV's I'm looking at are small (30"). Conventional wisdom seems to be that getting 780p is fine for that size - that you can't tell the difference between that and 1080. But I'm really more interested in whether there is a downside to having that TV resolution for hookup to a 360 or PS3. I'm sure there are people here who have very strong opinions on this matter. :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on October 03, 2008, 05:58:44 AM
Quote
Conventional wisdom seems to be that getting 780p is fine for that size - that you can't tell the difference between that and 1080.

I dare you to get a 780p tv. On that note, whoever says the difference between 1080p and 780p (or even 720p  :why_so_serious:) is noticeable, period.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on October 03, 2008, 06:19:46 AM
Yeah, here I'm sitting in an airport bored out of my skull and taking snark from schild.  :awesome_for_real:

Anyway, had trouble parsing that last sentence - you're saying 720p is fine for connecting to a 360?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on October 03, 2008, 06:26:50 AM
I'm saying given the current prices of TV and the fact this is costing you FAKE MAGIC MONEY, get a 1080p tv if they offer it. There is a difference, it's noticeable and the only people that say there isn't have only seen shitty 1080p tvs.

What TVs are they offering?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on October 03, 2008, 06:41:05 AM
I think at smaller sizes (up to 32") there's not a huge difference between the 720p and 1080p sets, but it is noticeable. It becomes dramatic at about 40" for me.

I'd get a 1080p just for clearest image on bluray, which is still the primary use of my ps3.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 03, 2008, 07:41:27 AM
I think the people saying there isn't much difference are arriving at their conclusion by comparing 720 media upscaled to 1080 to 1080 media played at 1080.  The results there are much closer in quality than plopping a 40" 1080 set down next to a 40" 720 set and making the comparison.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on October 04, 2008, 12:46:36 PM
I've been having a problem with my USB ports lately. My motherboard is an old ASUS P4P800s with USB 2.0 ports. In the device manager it shows 4 USB 1 ports and a fifth USB 2.0 port - and this is apparently normal.  All of the ports are supposed to be fast even though some show as the older type.

Unfortunately, about 1/2 the time when I stick a memory stick reader in I get a message saying the USB port is slow and I should use a different port. Sometimes if I uninstall and detect the ports again it fixes itself, sometimes it takes a reboot. Sometimes both.

Has anyone had this problem and found a real fix for it so I don't have to dick around anymore?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 04, 2008, 01:15:36 PM
uhm, I don't presume buying a new motherboard, cpu and ram (and probably video card) is an option, is it? Cuz that's some ancient hardware, bro.

As to how to fix that, I'd see if the motherboard manufacturer's site has any BIOS updates. It may be a known problem with the board.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on October 04, 2008, 02:42:18 PM
Well, it works and so far it's let me play every game that I want to play. There's just no justification for an upgrade until then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 04, 2008, 05:10:44 PM
I've been having a problem with my USB ports lately. My motherboard is an old ASUS P4P800s with USB 2.0 ports. In the device manager it shows 4 USB 1 ports and a fifth USB 2.0 port - and this is apparently normal.  All of the ports are supposed to be fast even though some show as the older type.

Unfortunately, about 1/2 the time when I stick a memory stick reader in I get a message saying the USB port is slow and I should use a different port. Sometimes if I uninstall and detect the ports again it fixes itself, sometimes it takes a reboot. Sometimes both.

Has anyone had this problem and found a real fix for it so I don't have to dick around anymore?
You could try sticking a powered USB 2.0 hub on the USB 2.0 port if you don't mind using up the extra electricity. I'm not sure a non-powered one would be enough to keep the 5th slot always in 2.0 mode but you could try that first if you can get one from a  place that has a good return policy.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on October 05, 2008, 03:26:40 PM
I'm saying given the current prices of TV and the fact this is costing you FAKE MAGIC MONEY, get a 1080p tv if they offer it. There is a difference, it's noticeable and the only people that say there isn't have only seen shitty 1080p tvs.

What TVs are they offering?
The one I was looking at is a Samsung LN32A450 (http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/detail/detail.do?group=televisions&type=televisions&subtype=lcdtv&model_cd=LN32A450C1DXZA). They do offer 1080p's, but they're much bigger TV's (and won't fit in the space we have), and are also double the cost.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on October 05, 2008, 07:06:35 PM
You didn't mention that you'd have to put money towards a 1080p tv or that you had limited space. >_>


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 05, 2008, 08:36:00 PM
The one I was looking at is a Samsung LN32A450 (http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/detail/detail.do?group=televisions&type=televisions&subtype=lcdtv&model_cd=LN32A450C1DXZA). They do offer 1080p's, but they're much bigger TV's (and won't fit in the space we have), and are also double the cost.

I have a slightly older version of that TV, it's a great set. Not too big but not at all small. Crisp pictures, looks awesome with DirecTV HD. Get a Harmony remote to go with it. :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on October 09, 2008, 01:21:46 PM
YEah, thanks for the advice, but i have already done that part lol, right now i am trying to get the overall price down. As far as video card, i had already chosen This one. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130318) (I currently use this on my new machine i bought about 2 months ago)

I may just list the whole machine as a public wish list, and let you guys go over it to make sure i'm not buying stupid things. But, what i was thinking is, buy the dual core, and upgrade it later (the slot allows for it)


EDIT: I need to figure out how to make it public, lol.

OK! it finally posted as public.

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=13007347

Thoughts, comments, recommendations ETC....


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 09, 2008, 04:56:26 PM
OK! it finally posted as public.

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=13007347

Thoughts, comments, recommendations ETC....
Get a DVD burner. Make sure you get a fan for hard drive cage -- that rotated cage really sucks for air flow. For power supply I would recommend something more along the lines of this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817103940



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 09, 2008, 11:45:50 PM

Thoughts, comments, recommendations ETC....

uhm...pink?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 09, 2008, 11:52:05 PM
uhm...pink?

Now, what i need is a decent CPU for my girls machine, something that will allow her to play games like LOTRO and WAR...and what ever else, she doesn't ever have a want to play anything as intensive as oblivion ETC..


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 09, 2008, 11:56:46 PM
fine. destroy my hopes that Mr. Bloodworth was secretly female, bringing our total count of women on this board to, uhm, what, 4? 5?

<shakes fist>


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on October 13, 2008, 07:48:20 AM
That build is pretty close to my current setup.  I've been able to play everything I've wanted with it and generally at max settings.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on October 13, 2008, 10:00:08 AM
Seems i need to choose a new Vid card, as that one is out of stock. I don't pay attention enough to know if its been discontinued or if they are just out. Maybe i can find a cheaper one =)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 13, 2008, 02:43:03 PM
fine. destroy my hopes that Mr. Bloodworth was secretly female, bringing our total count of women on this board to, uhm, what, 4? 5?

<shakes fist>
Seven regulars and semi-regulars, if I'm not forgetting anyone, plus another half-dozen or so less frequent posters.

We can double that once some daughters get old enough to post here.  (Could be many more, but I'm assuming any sensible parent will be blocking the f13 domain until they're like, thirty.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 14, 2008, 08:23:56 AM
children historically will not touch a parent's hobby with a ten foot pole, on account of how uncool it is. F13 daughters will in all likelihood end up in the SA forum, or maybe even FoH.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on October 14, 2008, 10:14:41 AM
fine. destroy my hopes that Mr. Bloodworth was secretly female, bringing our total count of women on this board to, uhm, what, 4? 5?

<shakes fist>

I will not cyber with you, stop PMing me!





 :why_so_serious:

OK! it finally posted as public.

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=13007347

Thoughts, comments, recommendations ETC....
Get a DVD burner. Make sure you get a fan for hard drive cage -- that rotated cage really sucks for air flow. For power supply I would recommend something more along the lines of this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817103940



Fan for hard drive cage?

How about this one? Seems to just take a HD bay.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835119010


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on October 14, 2008, 10:33:41 AM
children historically will not touch a parent's hobby with a ten foot pole, on account of how uncool it is. F13 daughters will in all likelihood end up in the SA forum, or maybe even FoH.
Call it a vice instead of a hobby then warn them never to come here, they will register in droves.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on October 15, 2008, 11:26:14 PM
Been having some issues with one of my harddrive partitions recently.

It is slow transferring files internally on the drive, and PC performance often begins to chug during intensive file activity on the drive.  For example, it took me almost 3 hours to run the installer for the current WoW patch, and the installer failed after that, where as after i copied the WoW directory to a partition on a different drive everything went smoothly, and install was done in less then 20 minutes.

Also, after checking the system log, I noticed that i am getting a large amount of the following entry, flagged as a "Warning":

'An error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk0\D during a paging operation.'

Wondering if anyone with experience in HD diagnostics might be able to tell me if this is an indication of imminent harddisk failure, or if it might be related to drivers, or possibly just that specific partition.  It only seems to occur on that partition.

If you need any other info, let me know what to look for and i will dig it up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 16, 2008, 12:03:42 AM
Get a utility that can display the SMART stats on your hard drives.

What's the actual Error ID reported in the log?

Do you have an anti-virus program running?

How much RAM do you have on your machine?

What's the Page File Usage history like on your machine?

Where's the Page File located?

Is it a fixed size or allowed to dynamically adjust itself?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 16, 2008, 02:12:42 AM
I've got a new one.

AVG (free, 8.0) won't update on this PC any more. It connects fine, pops up box with update details, I click "update" and it starts, then receives 0 bytes from the update server. If I go to the AVG webpage and try to manually download the updates the same thing happens - firefox just won't get a single byte from their servers.

All 5 of the other PC's and laptops in this house update fine. What I've been doing is manually downloading the updates on PC no.2 and putting them on the NAS and then updating this PC from there, but that's a pain in the arse with daily updates.

I've tried disabling my firewall (Sunbelt personal one) and I've looked in my hosts file but that's as far as my technical knowledge gets. I've searched t'web but not come up with anything.

Anyone got any ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 16, 2008, 02:18:22 AM
Do an nslookup and tracert on the machine that's working and not working and compare.

If they are the same download something like wget or curl and try to grab the download URL from the command prompt.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 16, 2008, 02:47:08 AM
OK, they're different!

PC that works:
Code:
C:\Documents and Settings\granny>nslookup downloadfree.avg.com
Server:  SpeedTouch.lan
Address:  10.0.0.138

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    a913.g.akamai.net
Addresses:  77.67.20.155, 77.67.20.163
Aliases:  downloadfree.avg.com, downloadfree.avg.com.edgesuite.net


C:\Documents and Settings\granny>tracert downloadfree.avg.com

Tracing route to a913.g.akamai.net [77.67.20.155]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  SpeedTouch.lan [10.0.0.138]
  2   502 ms   449 ms    39 ms  213.130.147.49
  3    84 ms    38 ms    39 ms  bdr5.lon-th1.as8401.net [195.82.97.237]
  4    36 ms    38 ms    37 ms  ge-4-1-4-0.lon10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.78.229]

  5    57 ms    54 ms    44 ms  xe-2-0-0.par70.ip.tiscali.net [89.149.186.161]
  6   283 ms   287 ms   145 ms  77.67.20.155

Trace complete.

PC that doesn't work:
Code:
C:\Documents and Settings\user>nslookup downloadfree.avg.com
Server:  dnscache0.eng.net
Address:  213.130.128.32

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    a913.g.akamai.net
Addresses:  84.53.177.11, 84.53.177.32
Aliases:  downloadfree.avg.com, downloadfree.avg.com.edgesuite.net


C:\Documents and Settings\user>tracert downloadfree.avg.com

Tracing route to a913.g.akamai.net [84.53.177.32]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  10.0.0.138
  2   262 ms    36 ms    35 ms  213.130.147.49
  3   176 ms   262 ms   116 ms  bdr5.lon-th1.as8401.net [195.82.97.237]
  4    37 ms    36 ms    39 ms  gi9-7.mpd01.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [149.6.3.5]

  5   106 ms    57 ms   245 ms  gig3-3-ies1.ldt.cw.net [208.175.240.29]
  6   181 ms   225 ms   225 ms  xe-11-0-0.xcr1.lsw.cw.net [195.2.25.29]
  7     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
...repeated for 30 hops.

What the hell is going on? Some kind of DNS issue?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 16, 2008, 05:37:57 AM
I'll suggest you have all of your machines use the same DNS server, preferably the one that the working machine is using.

Personally I use OpenDNS instead of my ISP DNS, but I cannot recall why I switched.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 16, 2008, 05:44:45 AM
How do I make that happen? I've never knowingly dicked about with DNS settings on any of them and don't really understand why they seem to be using different ones!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 16, 2008, 05:55:49 AM
On the PC you can change DNS settings in the TCP/IP properties for your ethernet connection.  You will have a similar section on your router, if you are using one.  I'm not at home right now, but I believe my setup is for my router to use the OpenDNS IPs and my PC does also, but I might have my router doing DNS for my PC.  Can't recall.  In your case, though, I'd check Network Connections -> right-click your ethernet -> Properties, choose TCP/IP, click Properties, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tige on October 16, 2008, 06:01:34 AM
I'm configuring a new laptop.

Any advantage or trinkets that make it worth going for Vista 64 over the 32 bit version?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 16, 2008, 06:04:06 AM
It's 64-bit, that's enough of a trinket if you ask me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 16, 2008, 07:24:48 AM
On the PC you can change DNS settings in the TCP/IP properties for your ethernet connection.  You will have a similar section on your router, if you are using one.  I'm not at home right now, but I believe my setup is for my router to use the OpenDNS IPs and my PC does also, but I might have my router doing DNS for my PC.  Can't recall.  In your case, though, I'd check Network Connections -> right-click your ethernet -> Properties, choose TCP/IP, click Properties, etc.

Cool, thanks, will go and try that next time I can get upstairs.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 16, 2008, 11:29:55 PM
Fixed! Somehow my main PC's TCP/IP had a specific IP and DNS set, when I set them back to "Obtain automatically" and set my router to OpenDNS it all started working fine. No idea how or why this PC had those settings, I have no memory of doing that.

Many thanks guys :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 17, 2008, 06:07:11 AM
Having a static IP on your PC isn't a bad thing, it was just your DNS settings.  I set a static IP on my PC so I can do port-forwarding to it, and also so I could give it a name in my wife's hosts file so she could more easily map the shared drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2008, 12:38:16 PM
Yeah.  It's entirely possible after you had set it, your provider changed their DNS address, or where ever you had it set to did.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 21, 2008, 07:28:04 AM
... your provider changed their DNS address...

This is probably why I went with OpenDNS.  Likely avoided some fun times when AT+T bought BellSouth with that decision.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 21, 2008, 09:45:54 AM
Any big provider really.  I've had all my ISPs change at least once or twice over the course of my service with them due to their own internal network upgrades.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 21, 2008, 11:43:10 AM
I want to tack semicolons to the end of my lines using Perl.

In Perl, s/$/;/g  behaves oddly.  I get expected results from s/a/;/g but the end-of-line match is being a pain and it seems to substitute ;\n; instead of just ;.  Anyone have any experience with this so I can shortcut my learning experience?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 21, 2008, 12:19:16 PM
Need to see your code. Best guess at this point is you are adding an "\n" in a print somewhere but not chomp'ing before hand or your input file has screwy line endings.

Contrary to popular belief the "$" metacharacter in Perl regular expressions does not signify "end of line" -- it means "end of string". Depending on how you've slurped up the file you are trying to edit this may or may not be what you want. If you really want $ to mean end-of-line you can use the "m" flag.

Something like this should work if you are dealing with standard Unix text files:

Code:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w

while (<>)
        {
        chomp($_);
        s/$/;/g;
        print $_, "\n";
        }


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 21, 2008, 12:35:49 PM
Pertinent code:
Code:
   while (<F>) {
      if ($oper eq "exact" or $oper eq "e") {
         $count++ if /$orig/;
         s/$orig/$new/g;
      } elsif
        ...
      }
      print O;
   }

I precompile the matching regex using qr//, so for $ the var $orig is (?-xism:$) instead of just a literal $, so it should do what I want.  However since it behaves perfectly well when using something other than $, I need to look into that bit.  I might try to manually deal with the newlines and see if that helps.  I'd rather not write a special case for this situation since new situations could come along that I have not thought of.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 21, 2008, 12:46:03 PM
What is $new set to? You aren't chomping anything either. Are you getting an extra "\n" at the end of your lines? There's also "\z" that can be used to match end of string instead of $, if you think that's messing things up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 21, 2008, 12:46:30 PM
Trippy, you gave me the tipoff since the fix was
Code:
   while (<F>) {
      chomp;
...
print O "$_\n";
   }

 :drill:

EDIT for dorkiness:  $new is, in this case, a ;.  The trouble was, indeed, my misuse of $ in this case, or just something funky with <> that I never noticed before.  The input file is a regular file with no embedded newlines, so... it works now so I'm having a hard time being interested.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on October 21, 2008, 04:08:36 PM
I'm worried about malware for the home.  We run XP boxes with AVG and MSFT security panel on (fw and antivirus).  I also occassionally put up ZoneAlarm.  Any recommendations for good malware detectors?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 21, 2008, 06:48:00 PM
I'm worried about malware for the home.  We run XP boxes with AVG and MSFT security panel on (fw and antivirus).  I also occassionally put up ZoneAlarm.  Any recommendations for good malware detectors?
The safest thing to do is to turn your normal user account into a non-admin account. That way the malware can't (usually) install anything even if you somehow inadverently click on something you shouldn't have in your browser.

I don't know anything about the "real time" protection some of these products provide.

I just had to deal with my dad's computer getting a massive malware infection. The online scanner from MS at http://onecare.live.com is remarkably good. It's far far better than that Windows Defender piece of crap, though it does run quite slowly. It even runs properly when booted into Safe Mode with networking turned on.

Unfortunately no single program can detect everything out there so you end up having to run a bunch of different programs and pray that they've found everything important. I also used Sophos, the online scanner from Panda, AVG, and some other ones.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on October 21, 2008, 08:28:39 PM
So.  I lost a hard drive this morning.  Came in and the computer wouldn't boot because the hard drive is making a funny clicking noise.  Turns out it won't boot as long as it is plugged in.  Not *overly* a problem, it was just the music drive with 10 years of MP3s (5% I don't have CDs for anymore due to attrition).  I had all of the music on several iPods, so it's not like the data is gone, just going to be a major pain the ass to rename 10,000 files from AFDD.mp3 and whatnot (ID3 info all intact).

I did notice that this is a Western Digital drive, of which I have had multiple people ask me about recovery on over the past few years.  Is there anything to be done about said drive once it is borked without shelling out to those expensive data recovery centers?  I don't think so, but it's been about 5 years since I was in the IT field and pickings were slim then on options.  Is there something about WD that means they have higher failures?  All of the drives have been of varying size and the failure is the same - spins, kind of, then clicking every other second or so.  WD's site is pretty much no help here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 21, 2008, 08:36:10 PM
Is there anything to be done about said drive once it is borked without shelling out to those expensive data recovery centers?  I don't think so, but it's been about 5 years since I was in the IT field and pickings were slim then on options.
If it's a mechanical problem you are basically boned without taking the platters out and putting them into another working casing. If it's a bad sector problem there are utilities that may be able to read some of stuff off of the drive.
 
Quote
Is there something about WD that means they have higher failures?
No.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on October 21, 2008, 10:00:39 PM
Thanks Trippy, it was Windows Defender I was looking at.  Sorry Selby.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on October 22, 2008, 05:34:09 AM
Quote
Is there something about WD that means they have higher failures?
No.
I figured not, but listening to people bitch about one brand or another (especially some of the lesser known names) made me wonder the question.

Now the next question is does anyone know of a file renaming program\ID3 library for MP3s or do I get to rename all the files by hand?  All of the ID3 tag info is there, so if I can read that I can rename the file to whatever I want and restore a directory structure that is useful to me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 22, 2008, 05:51:45 AM
I use TagScanner for that sort of thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 22, 2008, 09:56:04 AM
Thanks Trippy, it was Windows Defender I was looking at.  Sorry Selby.
There is always the standbys of Ad Aware and Spybot.  If I think a machine has something, I like to run several as each one seems to catch something the others don't.

Spybot also has TeaTimer for constant protection, but it's annoying as hell as every change in the registry pops up a dialog box.  Due to Microsoft's genius, there are a lot of legitimate changes happening there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 24, 2008, 05:58:21 AM
(http://www.housemd-guide.com/graphics/house_board.jpg)

The symptoms:

After upgrading my hard drive to a SATA, my IDE DVD Rom tends to give up the ghost.
I used to think it was a hardware problem, either with the drive or the cable, but this is now happening to my external RW CD Rom when I try to plug it in.

The hard drive indicator light and the drive light will come on and stay on. This is a very helpful  :uhrr: indicator as to when it's on the fritz.

Whenever I tinker with it, messing with drivers or system settings or the master/slave switch on the drive itself, it will go back to normal and play nice for a few hours or a few days. And then the problem comes back.

I'm very sadf, especially since most games have to be in the drive to play. *Insert snarky DRM complaint here*

I'm running good ole Windows XP SP3 on a M2A-VM motherboard system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 24, 2008, 06:36:24 AM
If this is your time you've used your SATA controller check for MB BIOS updates, check for IRQ conflicts, and try some of the other SATA ports on the MB.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 24, 2008, 09:40:13 AM
Also, uninstall your IDE controllers and let them be reinstalled at reboot. I've seen this problem before with Dell Optiplexes that have both IDE and Sata. Under Device Manager, the entries you're looking for are the Primary IDE Channel, the Secondary IDE Channel, and the Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on October 24, 2008, 09:52:33 AM
Well one would assume your external CD-ROM drive is USB, so both your IDE and USB drives go on the fritz which you can identify by the HDD indicator light (the little led on your case I assume) being constantly on.

Have you tried to plug in your external while your internal was unplugged?  If you have then we know that it isn't anything to do with the internal drive.

Is your old IDE hard drive still hooked up?  If so you might be taxing your power supply which could cause all sorts of odd problems, though chances are small an extra drive pushed it over the edge.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 24, 2008, 12:08:53 PM
Updated BIOS today. No effect.

I couldn't... identify where the IRQ settings are. The CMOS set up screen shows PCI plug & play IRQ's, but the drives are startup stuff. Maybe I'm reading it wrong?

Have tried plug 4 and plug 1 for the SATA HD. No change.

Just now tried uninstalling the IDE controllers and letting them reinstall on bootup. Looked good until I put a CD in the drive... at which point the drive failed.

Old HD is no longer in the computer. (Did a mirror of the old drive's contents when I installed it, and then removed the old drive.)

Will try unplugging the internal and using the external only later. My last fix took two whole days to fail though. So it can take some time to troubleshoot.  :sad_panda:

P.S. The drive lights symptom usually only happens after Windows loads up. I mean, when it's happening it never takes effect until Windows has loaded.  When the problem is happening, I can't even open the drive to insert/remove a disk. But I can open the disk tray before Windows loads.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 24, 2008, 12:39:49 PM
Do you have the StarForce?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 24, 2008, 01:13:27 PM
Or a dvd copying program such as CloneDVD or some such? Sometimes those programs will do a CD/DVD device mount (virtual mount) that can lock up your drive.

Also, when the drive fails, do you get any exclamation marks or Xs in the Device Manager? Or does it just suddenly poof?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 24, 2008, 01:47:39 PM
Or a dvd copying program such as CloneDVD or some such? Sometimes those programs will do a CD/DVD device mount (virtual mount) that can lock up your drive.

Also, when the drive fails, do you get any exclamation marks or Xs in the Device Manager? Or does it just suddenly poof?

Poof. It disappears from the drive manager altogether.

I don't think I have any DRM like Starforce. And I don't have any DvD copying stuff.

I did do another pass with uninstalling the IDE controller. Took both the ATI IDE controller and the dual channel controller out, and then rebooted. It's being good again (played some Guitar Hero 3) will give it a while and see if the problem returns.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 24, 2008, 01:49:59 PM
I figured if you installed something on purpose, you'd have checked it out, like Daemon Tools.  I'm left thinking it must be malware.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 24, 2008, 04:57:14 PM
Updated BIOS today. No effect.

I couldn't... identify where the IRQ settings are. The CMOS set up screen shows PCI plug & play IRQ's, but the drives are startup stuff. Maybe I'm reading it wrong?
First check the device manager for the drive controllers and look at their resources. Easy way is to select View -> Resources by Type -> IRQ. Your ATA controllers should all be on separate IRQs and they also shouldn't overlap with your USB controllers. If there is a conflict there you'll have to fiddle with your BIOS to turn off auto-assignment of IRQs and manually reassign them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 25, 2008, 04:01:49 AM
Updated BIOS today. No effect.

I couldn't... identify where the IRQ settings are. The CMOS set up screen shows PCI plug & play IRQ's, but the drives are startup stuff. Maybe I'm reading it wrong?
First check the device manager for the drive controllers and look at their resources. Easy way is to select View -> Resources by Type -> IRQ. Your ATA controllers should all be on separate IRQs and they also shouldn't overlap with your USB controllers. If there is a conflict there you'll have to fiddle with your BIOS to turn off auto-assignment of IRQs and manually reassign them.


Got another failure tonight.

Pictures!

(http://www.angelfire.com/ak4/ratman/IRQ.jpg)

I see the primary and secondary IDE channels on IRQs 14 and 15, yes?
I see a lot of the USB host controller sharing IRQs all over the place. ?

One other thing I did is get a new case. It has two USB ports on the front, in addition to the USB ports on the motherboard. I connected the front ports up for game controllers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 25, 2008, 04:19:34 AM
I'm not familiar with the AMD 690G chipset but it looks like your computer thinks your SATA ports are acting as standard IDE. I.e. the "Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller" entry does not look right and your SATA drive is probably being accessed in legacy parallel IDE mode and that may be causing your problem.

See here for any example (not saying this solution will work for you but this is an indication of the problem):

http://gammu.org/wiki/index.php?title=HydePark:Nx6325#SATA


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 25, 2008, 09:31:38 AM
The plot sickens.

I did some googling on Trippy's last post. Most likely I installed the drive in IDE mode. I found a post on a tech board about converting it over to AHCI mode.

Quote
It turned out to be straight forward.
 The mainboard (ASUS M2A-VM) comes with a nice driver cd.
You can even boot it. It starts FreeDOS and creates the driver floppy for you.
 In the BIOS I chose AHCI over the default IDE compatibility mode and then booted the Windows XP Home cd.
 It had no issue with the SATA burner.
 I hit F6 and it went for the AHCI/RAID drivers on the floppy.
 No problem whatsoever.

I'm hoping I can create the driver floppies (need to throw a floppy drive in the computer, I haven't needed one until now) change the hard drive to AHCI mode and do a repair install of Windows XP and not have to do a clean install.

Thoughts?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 25, 2008, 09:35:25 AM
Sure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 25, 2008, 09:37:53 AM
Question for Trippy:

Is the ISA designation left over from back in the day when we had ISA slots, or does it stand for something else now? Also, how would one go about changing that? Do you manually assign a PCI IRQ to the device in question, or can you do so via Windows managed IRQ assignment? I mean, I know its possible to switch the assignment from automatic (the defualt) to manual, and monkey around with the devices IRQ numbers, but which is the better way?

Ratman, I think you may be able to change how Windows identifies your hard drives by upgrading the drivers for them from IDE to AHCI via a reinstallation of HD's drivers. To quote Trippy's link:

Quote

According to some people (for example http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/bizsupport/questionanswer.do?threadId=1067638):

While the (HDD) drive itself is a SATA drive it is being accessed using legacy PATA mode.
 
You can change the device "Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller" into "ATI 4379 Serial ATA Controller" in Windows (32Bit) by changing the driver. 3 steps needed:

1. download Silicon Image Driver: http://www.siliconimage.com/docs/3x12-x86-1.3.68.2-logo.zip

2. edit SI3112.inf: replace the subsys "43791002" with "30B0103C" (Line 95,100,401)

3. update the device "Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller" (PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4379&SUBSYS_30B0103C&REV_80) with the modified driver, "ATI 4379 Serial ATA Controller" should be shown now as compatible

(successfully tested an working on Vista32 Business.)



Note, this is for a specific ACHI controller, namely the one from Silicon Image, but the drivers for your particular controller should be out there too. However, it may be more complicated, since it seems that there needs to be some modification for the .inf file, and who knows what it would be for your particular device.

I just tend to shy away from rebuilding the OS. It leaves a lot of orphaned registry entries that clog systems, and you have to re-register windows update once or twice to get all your patches up to snuff. You will also have to reinstall IE7 if you're using an install disk that doesn't include it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 25, 2008, 09:49:07 AM
Question for Trippy:

Is the ISA designation left over from back in the day when we had ISA slots, or does it stand for something else now?
The former. It's mostly legacy now and there's an ISA IRQ<->PCI IRQ handler within the PCI controller that handles converting between ISA-style interrupts and PCI ones.

Quote
Also, how would one go about changing that? Do you manually assign a PCI IRQ to the device in question, or can you do so via Windows managed IRQ assignment? I mean, I know its possible to switch the assignment from automatic (the defualt) to manual, and monkey around with the devices IRQ numbers, but which is the better way?:
Don't know which is the "better" way. If I had to do it I would muck with the BIOS first, but that's just me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 25, 2008, 09:52:32 AM
Note, this is for a specific ACHI controller, namely the one from Silicon Image, but the drivers for your particular controller should be out there too. However, it may be more complicated, since it seems that there needs to be some modification for the .inf file, and who knows what it would be for your particular device.

I just tend to shy away from rebuilding the OS. It leaves a lot of orphaned registry entries that clog systems, and you have to re-register windows update once or twice to get all your patches up to snuff. You will also have to reinstall IE7 if you're using an install disk that doesn't include it.


Yep. That's why I posted for opinions before doing it. I'm in no huge hurry, so I'll poke around some more and see if I can just find the driver tweakage info somewhere.

*Edit to add*

I got the AHCI drivers from the CD (had to use Slyfeind's computer to access the CD, grrr.) ahcix86
Had no luck finding anyone who's tweaked the drivers for a hot swap to AHCI mode though.

Man. I'd settle for IDE emulation mode, if it weren't for the conflict problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 25, 2008, 11:55:39 AM
It might be worth installing the drivers (as in, run the installer, even if the drivers do not 'attatch' to anything yet), then uninstall the SATA drivers and rebooting. Maybe they will automatically be reassigned to a new IRQ and take up the new drivers (now available in /system32). I've seen stranger things happen.

Another way maybe would be to delete the IDE controllers rather than simply uninstall the drivers. However, this may also require registry deletions so that the change is really forced, rather than simply a reassignment process. This gets into nutty territory, tho, and I probably not do it myself without an image to restore to in the event of complete OS vaporization.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 25, 2008, 02:16:28 PM
It might be worth installing the drivers (as in, run the installer, even if the drivers do not 'attatch' to anything yet), then uninstall the SATA drivers and rebooting. Maybe they will automatically be reassigned to a new IRQ and take up the new drivers (now available in /system32). I've seen stranger things happen.

Another way maybe would be to delete the IDE controllers rather than simply uninstall the drivers. However, this may also require registry deletions so that the change is really forced, rather than simply a reassignment process. This gets into nutty territory, tho, and I probably not do it myself without an image to restore to in the event of complete OS vaporization.

There was no install or setup. Just raw drivers.

Well, I found a thread

http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=444831&page=4

One guy in this thread just changed his ATI Dual Channel drivers and bing! Mine wouldn't take the AHCI driver. :(

Another fellow claims to have followed the instructions but changed the registry edit file for an Asus with the ATI SB600 chipset (the same one on my motherboard) That seems like the ticket, but I'm wondering what I have to change between his registry edit and my system. (using the 32 instead of 64 is obvious, but what else is different?

I'm concerned I'm getting in over my head here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jimbo on October 25, 2008, 04:11:51 PM
I finally bought the rest of the parts to upgrade the two computers I have, was wondering if you all think I could put together a cheap machine that runs CoX and WoW for a couple of people I know.  Cheap as in less than $500 if possible.  I have cases and dvd players, but the rest I'm researching.  Oh, it would be good stable stuff that will last, not something that requires a lot of fiddling with.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 25, 2008, 04:57:21 PM
It might be worth installing the drivers (as in, run the installer, even if the drivers do not 'attatch' to anything yet), then uninstall the SATA drivers and rebooting. Maybe they will automatically be reassigned to a new IRQ and take up the new drivers (now available in /system32). I've seen stranger things happen.

Another way maybe would be to delete the IDE controllers rather than simply uninstall the drivers. However, this may also require registry deletions so that the change is really forced, rather than simply a reassignment process. This gets into nutty territory, tho, and I probably not do it myself without an image to restore to in the event of complete OS vaporization.

There was no install or setup. Just raw drivers.

Well, I found a thread

http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=444831&page=4

One guy in this thread just changed his ATI Dual Channel drivers and bing! Mine wouldn't take the AHCI driver. :(

Another fellow claims to have followed the instructions but changed the registry edit file for an Asus with the ATI SB600 chipset (the same one on my motherboard) That seems like the ticket, but I'm wondering what I have to change between his registry edit and my system. (using the 32 instead of 64 is obvious, but what else is different?

I'm concerned I'm getting in over my head here.
Okay I'm confused. Did you download the RAID/AHCI drivers from here?:

http://support.asus.com/download/download.aspx?SLanguage=en-us&model=M2A-VM

When I look inside the archive I see setup programs for the drivers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 25, 2008, 05:43:37 PM
I finally bought the rest of the parts to upgrade the two computers I have, was wondering if you all think I could put together a cheap machine that runs CoX and WoW for a couple of people I know.  Cheap as in less than $500 if possible.  I have cases and dvd players, but the rest I'm researching.  Oh, it would be good stable stuff that will last, not something that requires a lot of fiddling with.
Well thanks to the Microsoft Tax, it's going to be a stretch at $500 a piece but it's doable.

From Newegg:

$_59.99  AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Brisbane 2.6GHz Socket AM2 65W Dual-Core Processor Model ADO5000DOBOX - Retail
$_69.99  BIOSTAR TForce TF720 A2+ AM2+/AM2 NVIDIA nForce 720a ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail
$_64.99  EVGA 512-P3-N954-TR GeForce 9500 GT 512MB 128-bit GDDR2 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card - Retail
$_36.99  CORSAIR XMS2 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model TWIN2X2048-6400 - Retail
$_59.99  Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD3200AAKS 320GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - OEM
$_99.99  Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium SP1 64-bit English for System Builders 1pk DSP OEI DVD - OEM

$391.94  SUBTOTAL

That leaves you $100 for a monitor, if needed, and other misc. items like mouse and keyboard.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 26, 2008, 04:12:58 AM
It might be worth installing the drivers (as in, run the installer, even if the drivers do not 'attatch' to anything yet), then uninstall the SATA drivers and rebooting. Maybe they will automatically be reassigned to a new IRQ and take up the new drivers (now available in /system32). I've seen stranger things happen.

Another way maybe would be to delete the IDE controllers rather than simply uninstall the drivers. However, this may also require registry deletions so that the change is really forced, rather than simply a reassignment process. This gets into nutty territory, tho, and I probably not do it myself without an image to restore to in the event of complete OS vaporization.

There was no install or setup. Just raw drivers.

Well, I found a thread

http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=444831&page=4

One guy in this thread just changed his ATI Dual Channel drivers and bing! Mine wouldn't take the AHCI driver. :(

Another fellow claims to have followed the instructions but changed the registry edit file for an Asus with the ATI SB600 chipset (the same one on my motherboard) That seems like the ticket, but I'm wondering what I have to change between his registry edit and my system. (using the 32 instead of 64 is obvious, but what else is different?

I'm concerned I'm getting in over my head here.
Okay I'm confused. Did you download the RAID/AHCI drivers from here?:

http://support.asus.com/download/download.aspx?SLanguage=en-us&model=M2A-VM

When I look inside the archive I see setup programs for the drivers.


These are the drivers that came with the mobo CD. I did download the AHCI/RAID stuff from Asus, and the setup programs say "Installation Failed" when I try to run them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 26, 2008, 04:18:24 AM
Ah, okay :ye_gods: :uhrr:

Does the system Event Viewer utility show anything after it fails?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 26, 2008, 04:42:10 AM
Ah, okay :ye_gods: :uhrr:

Does the system Event Viewer utility show anything after it fails?


Nothing that I can tell.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 26, 2008, 08:49:22 AM
One has to assumed the installation failed because the devices (the hard drives) are already happily ensconced in their own PATA settings.

My next step would be to go into BIOS and reassign those two PATA IRQs in ISA mode to the higher end PCI IRQs. Change PRimary and Secondary IDE from 14 and 15 ISA IRQ to PCI 23 and 24. Worse comes to worst, you can go back into BIOS and change them back.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 26, 2008, 03:49:56 PM
One has to assumed the installation failed because the devices (the hard drives) are already happily ensconced in their own PATA settings.
No that doesn't make sense because you would never be able to install ACHI drivers under XP if that was the case.

Quote
My next step would be to go into BIOS and reassign those two PATA IRQs in ISA mode to the higher end PCI IRQs. Change PRimary and Secondary IDE from 14 and 15 ISA IRQ to PCI 23 and 24. Worse comes to worst, you can go back into BIOS and change them back.
No you don't want to do that either. 14 and 15 are the proper IRQs for the parallel IDE controller.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 26, 2008, 05:37:55 PM
But I thought the whole issue was that you didn't want them in Parallel IDE drives, but in SATA ones, which would mean higher, unused IRQs? Maybe I lost the thread of the arguement.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 26, 2008, 08:03:17 PM
But I thought the whole issue was that you didn't want them in Parallel IDE drives, but in SATA ones, which would mean higher, unused IRQs? Maybe I lost the thread of the arguement.
The "Primary" IDE controllers at 14 and 15 are, in fact, parallel IDE controllers (that's the standard IRQs for them). It's the hard drive controller at IRQ 22 that I believe is the issue. It's not showing up as an SATA controller when in fact that's what it is. The IRQ assignment itself is fine cause it's not being shared by anything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 26, 2008, 09:13:09 PM
Gocha, I got confused when I saw 14 and 15 assigned to Primary and Secondary IDE, but also saw IRQ 22 assigned to that other IDE controller, which I though somehow was tied to the the other two, and hence that was the source of the problem. If I understand it correctly, 14 and 15 are just fine, since they are the ones actually tied to the CD rom drive that's failing.

So now, if I understand this correctly, the working theory is that by having 22 assigned as an IDE controller, its mucking up the actual IDE controllers at 14 and 15. By chancing 22 to an actual SATA controller, rather than IDE, it would stop gumming up the devices at 14 and 15.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 26, 2008, 09:37:10 PM
No. My current hypothesis is that the fact that the SATA drive is currently running in PATA-emulation mode (cause the SATA controller is running in that mode) is somehow mucking up the other drives in his computer. There's no IRQ issue that I can see.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 26, 2008, 09:45:08 PM
That's what I was saying, just using IRQs as lables to differentiate between the actual IDE drive, the CD rom, and the SATA drive, currently assigned to IRQ 22 and using a PATA emulation (And I do understand now that IRQ assignment has nothing to do with the problem)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 27, 2008, 05:19:08 AM
That's what I was saying, just using IRQs as lables to differentiate between the actual IDE drive, the CD rom, and the SATA drive, currently assigned to IRQ 22 and using a PATA emulation (And I do understand now that IRQ assignment has nothing to do with the problem)

The drives on my machine:

1 SATA hard drive running in IDE emulation mode.
1 IDE DVD Rom running correctly in IDE mode.

In case you thought I might have any other drives. The external RW drive is a USB guy, and is usually not plugged in unless I'm burning CDs. And I don't even have a floppy drive installed ATM.

I would be perfectly fine keeping the SATA drive in IDE mode. It's the possible conflict that's the issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 27, 2008, 05:22:34 AM
No that doesn't make sense because you would never be able to install ACHI drivers under XP if that was the case.

It's possible to install the SATA drivers at OS install. Since I put the drive in IDE mode when installing, no SATA controllers or drivers are installed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 27, 2008, 05:51:16 AM
It's possible to install the SATA drivers at OS install. Since I put the drive in IDE mode when installing, no SATA controllers or drivers are installed.

This is what Engels wrote:

One has to assumed the installation failed because the devices (the hard drives) are already happily ensconced in their own PATA settings.
You have a chicken and egg problem cause you have to turn on and off PATA emulation mode in the BIOS. But you can't boot off an AHCI controller (i.e. emulation mode turned off) and drive unless Windows has a driver for it. If you can't install AHCI drivers "after the fact" (i.e. other than slipstreaming them at OS install time) then none of the solutions you've been reading with installing drivers "manually" or using a setup program would work at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 27, 2008, 07:27:17 AM
Ah. I was under the impression that these guys had managed to load the drivers somehow during the registry tweak and enable AHCI mode after the fact.

So I'm probably looking at a fresh install or somehow resolving the conflict with the SATA in IDE mode then?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 27, 2008, 07:32:40 AM
No you have it backwards. I'm *disagreeing* with Engels ("No that doesn't make sense"). If he's right then you couldn't install AHCI drivers after the fact. I think he's wrong and that you can.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 27, 2008, 09:41:44 AM
I think it has to be possible as well, but I am not expert enough to know how. One would have hoped that that installer would have done the trick, but I bet the installer expects you to have installed the OS using the f6 option of loading the drivers at installation time, and the installer only 'updates' or puts a few packaged software bundles around it.

I don't know if you've tried this, but listing the Devices by type, can you right-click 'update driver' and then go through a manual installation where you navigate to the folder containing the unpacked driver files, and select the correct .inf file? Do the 'Don't search, I will chose the driver to install' option, then select 'Have Disk', which lets you browse directories for the specific file.

I think I may have been misunderstood when I said earlier that the 'drivers are happily ensconced in their IDE emulation role'. Its not that one can't change this, but that Windows may not see that you're trying to change the very type of drive, and hence fails. Windows may have to be forced to accept the entirely different hardware profile by doing it manually. It may even send out large warnings about how this isn't the driver required.

I'd be hesitant to do it, however, without a backup of necessary data, since it may make your OS unbootable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 27, 2008, 12:38:22 PM
I think it has to be possible as well, but I am not expert enough to know how. One would have hoped that that installer would have done the trick, but I bet the installer expects you to have installed the OS using the f6 option of loading the drivers at installation time, and the installer only 'updates' or puts a few packaged software bundles around it.

I don't know if you've tried this, but listing the Devices by type, can you right-click 'update driver' and then go through a manual installation where you navigate to the folder containing the unpacked driver files, and select the correct .inf file? Do the 'Don't search, I will chose the driver to install' option, then select 'Have Disk', which lets you browse directories for the specific file.

Yeah, tried that. It fails to load the drivers.

Quote
I think I may have been misunderstood when I said earlier that the 'drivers are happily ensconced in their IDE emulation role'. Its not that one can't change this, but that Windows may not see that you're trying to change the very type of drive, and hence fails. Windows may have to be forced to accept the entirely different hardware profile by doing it manually. It may even send out large warnings about how this isn't the driver required.

I'd be hesitant to do it, however, without a backup of necessary data, since it may make your OS unbootable.

Yep. Looks like I might have to live with it until I get fed up and then I'll just do a complete reinstall of the OS instead of doing it half-assed and possibly just creating more problems.

Well, thanks for the input guys. And if anyone has any bright ideas about resolving the IDE conflict itself, lemme know.

*Edit for update*

I installed the most recent southbridge chip drivers from ATI today, and it's held up to some decent stress testing. Swapping games out, rebooting, etc. So far so good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 29, 2008, 10:13:00 AM
Still no conflicts. If it makes it to tomorrow, I'm going to call it fixed.  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 29, 2008, 10:14:21 AM
Just curious; when you updated the southbridge drivers, did it change how the PCI controllers are listed? Did it change them from parallel emulation to something else?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on October 29, 2008, 11:28:35 AM
Just curious; when you updated the southbridge drivers, did it change how the PCI controllers are listed? Did it change them from parallel emulation to something else?

I was going to say "No", but I took another look just now, and it did make one change. My floppy drive (IRQ 6) is no longer listed.
(Which is correct, as I have never had a floppy in this computer.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 30, 2008, 11:20:40 AM
Ok so here's a (possibly) quick question. The house I'm living in right now has a wireless network set up on a Thomson TG585 v7 with WEP security and I'm having problems connecting to it from my desktop. Specifically it's not assigning an IP address, I also can't access the router setup through it. I've got a Linksys WUSB54G adaptor and I've tried repairing the connection, messing with the settings (specifically trying to set a static IP address on the computer which didn't help).

Basically it seems my computer can see the router but the router can't see it, presently connected fine with my laptop. What's weird is that I had this problem before with it using the Linksys Monitor to connect and when I switche over to XP's default program it worked fine. Had been for a couple of weeks then yesterday it went poof again. I've not changed any settings it just suddenly decided my computer was invisible again. Any ideas? I've got something of a physical limitation in the if I want to connect it to the router physically I need to take my desktop down two floors or get a very long cable. I'd rather not do that unless absolutely necessary.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 30, 2008, 01:17:30 PM
You probably already covered this, but are you able to connect to any other wireless network with that computer? I ask because sometimes there's a battle between the wireless card software provided by the manufacturer and the Windows software, and switching between them can sometimes 'unclog' the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 30, 2008, 01:39:32 PM
I'v tried switchin back and forth, doesn't seem to make any difference. I've also tried connecting in Ubuntu on the same machine that didn't work either but wireless networking in Ubuntu is dodgy anyway (as I've heard) so I'm not sure what that shows. But yeah, same problem using Windows or the Linksys program.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 30, 2008, 05:35:38 PM
I've had some sketchy experiences with wireless on both my router and my dsl modem. I've found that redoing the WEP (to exactly what you had before, if you like) can unclog it too. My particular trouble has to do with my iPhone at home rather than a computer, but in most cases, its the router that's munging things up, not the computer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 30, 2008, 05:38:18 PM
Bleh, that will involve talking to whoever set it up. I don't know the other people I'm living with that well, guess it's an excuse for another awkward 5 minute chat where I get to know some of them a little more.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 30, 2008, 05:42:18 PM
Bleh, that will involve talking to whoever set it up. I don't know the other people I'm living with that well, guess it's an excuse for another awkward 5 minute chat where I get to know some of them a little more.

you don't have the admin password to the router? cuz the IP should be pretty easy to get, since chances are its just your default gateway. That is, unless, you have another router in between. But even then, looking at your router you should be able to see the forward looking IP the router gets from the uhm, neighbor's router.

One other thing you could check before bugging the neighbors is seeing what protocol the laptop is using, a/b/g/n etc. See if you can force your desktop to use the specific protocol the laptop is using.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 30, 2008, 06:19:19 PM
On checking, I've got admin access to the router, little hesitant to play around with it right now since there seem to be a couple of other people on it but I guess I'll try and see if I can mess about tomorrow. Looking at the setting though there doesn't seem to be anything that would block my desktop from connecting. The router's set to b/g and I've got a g adapter. I also tried setting the desktop IP, DNS, etc. to the settings the laptop was using, it made Windows happy that everything was fine but the router wasn't buying it.

Looking at the router's setup page, my PC claims to be connected to the wireless network but the router clearly doesn't see it at all, it's not listed under connected devices.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: JWIV on October 30, 2008, 06:25:20 PM
is the router running mac filtering,


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 31, 2008, 06:50:30 AM
Nope, my laptop can connect without issue and my desktop did connect for about two weeks. I've tried accessing and pinging the router for shits and giggles with the desktop (in limited connectivity mode) and cannot access it, disabled firewalls, etc. Tried reinstalling the software for my adapter but that didn't help. The fact that it did work for a couple of weeks and then stopped without me doing anything makes me feel it's unlikely to be on my end (also Engel's opinion for this sort of problem generally).

So seeing as the settings before seemed to work and my desktop seems to be the only PC having issues connecting to it now an suggestions as to what settings I should flick around with that may help? I've also got a niggling worry that it may be some sort of clogging with mutiple programs trying to run the adapter since the Linksys adapter needs the linksys program to work at all and I could only connect before when I switched to Windows. It says the Linksys monitor is turned off, I just don't know if I trust it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 31, 2008, 06:55:37 AM
If you think it might be running, you can check for sure with Process Explorer (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 31, 2008, 09:17:58 AM
So according to processor explorer it's definitely still running but isn't taking up any CPU resources when windows tries to connect. Killing it however kills the connection entirely so it's obviously doing something however it doesn't seem possible to run this wireless adapter without it and it isn't able to connect to the router itself.

Is it possible I'm seeing some problem between the windows wireless and Linksys monitor in terms of talking to the router? Seems weird that it would work and then just stop but seems like it could make sense. Any ideas on how I could test this or better yet ways of fixing it if it's the case (would rather not just buy a new network adapter except as a last resort)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on October 31, 2008, 09:27:54 AM
There is a setting somewhere for having windows manage the connection.  You could try turning that off and letting just the Linksys app run or vice-versa.

I've had similar issues before but the Windows driver has always been sufficient for running the connection so I just kill the vendor app and take take it out of the startup routine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 31, 2008, 09:50:45 AM
Ok I've managed to solve it. The adapter wouldn't work at all without the vendor program running so I nuked it from orbit, had to go and find the install CD again since windows wouldn't recognise the drivers I'd downloaded for it. Put the CD in without installing and then plugged the adapter and let XP handle everything, seems to have taken care of it. Thanks to everyone for chipping in with what turned out to be a simple fix that only took me a whole day to think of.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on November 04, 2008, 09:57:51 AM
Trying to find an easy to fix something really dumb in an Excel sheet. Someone at work designed a report that includes nifty little checkmarks and X's.
The report is online, and I needed a copy of the data, so I cust and pasted the whole thing in to Excel. Problem is, it put every one of those checks and x's in as a picture inside the cell. As a result, the whole sheet is slow as hell.

There doesn't appear to be any way to search for pictures in a cell, so I can't find/replace them to replace them .

Any ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 04, 2008, 10:31:17 AM
Select all, copy, Paste Special text only into a new excel sheet? No idea if that's feasible or if it will work though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 05, 2008, 09:05:00 AM
Select all, copy, Paste Special text only into a new excel sheet? No idea if that's feasible or if it will work though.

Yes copy from the web, "paste special"/text into excel then if you are lucky you might get the alt text for the images in the appropriate cells.  If that happens you can search in replace, if it doesn't then you lose all the information represented by the images. 

Alternatively if the online report was truly created in house you could nicely ask the person who did it if they can add an export to excel/csv feature.  Not sure what web tech was used for the report but exporting a csv is generally not that hard and how to do it is easily findable on the web.  I do this in php all the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on November 05, 2008, 11:56:39 AM
That's about what I figured. The images don't register as even being in the cells, so paste special isn't going to work. I worked around it by trimming the sheet down to just Florida data, since I'll be using it at a Florida tradeshow and won't need any other states 95% of the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on November 11, 2008, 07:29:00 AM
After nearly two weeks with no drive issues, the problem resurfaced this morning. I am beginning to suspect DRM on Hellgate: London is the culprit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 11, 2008, 10:50:07 AM
Which is sort of ironic.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on November 11, 2008, 11:17:48 AM
Which is sort of ironic.

If by ironic you mean stupid, then I agree.  :x


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 11, 2008, 07:50:57 PM
On the plus side, it'll only be a problem until the end of January.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on November 12, 2008, 12:36:41 AM
On the plus side, it'll only be a problem until the end of January.   :awesome_for_real:

Actually I usually play offline. Online you don't even need the CD in the drive.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 12, 2008, 06:23:17 PM
Heh, how stupid is this one?

I have a PDF. I need to add text to it.

How?

Without pirating something, please.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on November 12, 2008, 06:28:31 PM
If it's something someone gave you to fill in, like a contract or form, you should be able to add text in the adobe pdf reader. If it's not allowing such writing, it's meant to be printed and filled out - or they fucked up.

That said, there's no such thing as working with a PDF unless you pirate or buy something.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 12, 2008, 06:31:49 PM
Lame. It's just something I need to add my damn name to before I email it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 12, 2008, 06:40:08 PM
You could hack the PostScript :awesome_for_real: (assuming it's not encrypted...)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 12, 2008, 06:47:25 PM
Properties say there is no security on the file. Assembly, commenting, signing, and Creation of Template Pages is not allowed. Not sure if that helps at all.

There's just a line asking for my name in a blank spot, and I want to add it....damnit.


edit: Just to be clear...I'm not trying to do anything dishonest here. It would just be a Lot more convenient if I could type in this bit of into and email the form to whoever I intend to mail it to, have them print it out and fill in what they need to fill in, and return the paperwork to me. I'm trying to save myself a trip to physically deliver a single page to someone.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tige on November 12, 2008, 06:57:51 PM
Heh, how stupid is this one?

I have a PDF. I need to add text to it.

How?

Without pirating something, please.

http://www.foxitsoftware.com (http://www.foxitsoftware.com)

Specifically  http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/pe_intro.php (http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/pe_intro.php)

I think it is still free. 


edit:  Looks like they make you jump through more hoops than before though for the demo or trial.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 12, 2008, 07:13:04 PM
Downloaded their editor...and when I saved, it adds red "evaluation purposes" nonsense into my doc....ugh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tige on November 12, 2008, 07:26:28 PM
Downloaded their editor...and when I saved, it adds red "evaluation purposes" nonsense into my doc....ugh.

That sucks.  They used to have a small, unobtrusive watermark on their demos. 

That was my best shot for a .pdf editor unless there is a way to find the evaluation text within the program and remove it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 12, 2008, 07:37:03 PM
I guess I'll just ask the recipient to fill in my name when they print it. I was trying to avoid this, but it's such a small thing I hope they don't think much of it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on November 13, 2008, 06:13:06 AM
Can't you just take a screenshot and draw your name in with Paint?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 13, 2008, 02:22:33 PM
Illustrator can modify pdf's not free or cheap but you probably know someone who has it.

The screenshot thing works too, once you are done just print it to a pdf writer to make it a pdf again (i personally use pdf redirect and it is free).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 13, 2008, 03:20:00 PM
Ah, good ideas. I'll have to see if anyone I know has Illustrator.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 15, 2008, 07:30:47 AM
MS Word 2007 can write PDF, just can't read it.  Might work for you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on November 15, 2008, 08:15:48 AM
Suggestions that would have taken less time than you've invested so far:
  • Retype the form in Word
  • Print the form, write in your name, put it in an envelope, mail it
Just sayin'.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 15, 2008, 10:07:18 PM
- Form has goofy graphics, tables, and shit. PITA to reproduce.

- Snail mail takes too long. I'd be better off walking it there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on November 16, 2008, 12:13:48 AM
Fax it. Every copy shop has a buck a page fax service.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 16, 2008, 09:49:14 AM
I have an old Compaq Presario 2200 laptop I needed to reinstall XP Home on (been a few years and the computer had many ghosts in machine). I want to back this thing up periodically though to prevent what's turn into about 10 hours of work moving back and organized files. However, I can't find even the default Windows Backup program. I assume it wasn't included under XP Home.

So, suggestions? I'll take anything competent and free, though all I really need to do is back up the entirety of My Documents.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 16, 2008, 09:56:17 AM
If the only thing you need to hold is My Documents, can't you just use a compression program?  I use WinRAR, but there are several out there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 16, 2008, 09:58:59 AM
Sorry, I should have added more details.

I want to back up the folder to a different volume on my network. And I want that to recur weekly. And I want it to happen automatically at around 1am.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 16, 2008, 03:52:35 PM
I have rsync scheduled to do my backups.  It requires mapping a network location to drive letter or a machine which can handle SSH, and a bit of fiddling, but it works alright.  If you want, I can give you my scripts and the programs to download.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on November 17, 2008, 01:36:31 PM
Use SyncToy (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=c26efa36-98e0-4ee9-a7c5-98d0592d8c52&displaylang=en), it's a free Microsoft PowerToy.  Works great for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 17, 2008, 08:24:45 PM
Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 19, 2008, 12:07:31 PM
Goofy question, and I don't have a lot of time to research it.  Our fiscal year is ending in about 24 hours.  :(

We have a art room in our library and we're thinking about putting a LCD TV in there to show a power point presentation that simply rotates through its panels all day.  We found a 19" Samsung LN19A650 19" High Def LCD TV w/ USB 2.0 port.

Is it possible to use this like a digital photo frame, where we don't need a PC but can put the power point on a flash drive, install that into the USB and let that run all day?  I'm thinking it won't work... as the LCD has no way to recognize what a power point is.  But I really have no idea, and don't have enough time to research it. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on November 19, 2008, 12:28:25 PM
Looks like the TV only recognizes mpeg/mp3 and jpeg.  You might be able to convert your .pps into a mpeg video and see if the TV will loop it though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 19, 2008, 12:31:11 PM
Awesome, that's a step in the right direction.  Thanks a ton.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 19, 2008, 12:37:36 PM
Or maybe a slideshow of JPGs if that fails.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kail on November 19, 2008, 02:55:24 PM
My PC is having seisures, wondering if anyone can shed any light on it.

PC's about two years old.  It's always been a bit flaky (some inconsistent error messages regarding the system fan), but I haven't had any real problems with it until last summer, when it died and I had to reformat the hard drive.  Since then, it's gone from "kind of quirky" to "needs to be rebooted every two hours or so".  Disk scan has picked up some bad sectors and things, but it doesn't seem to have helped much.  Virus scan just shows the usual ad cookies and things.  Just installed some new RAM, too.

Problems I'm having are kind of diverse.  A lot of programs crash frequently.  Warhammer has random crashes to desktop, and odd "file missing" error messages.  Flock keeps "encountering an error and needs to close", as does Fallout 3.  World of Warcraft keeps giving weird "file corrupt" messages, even after I run the repair.  Sometimes the system just reboots itself when I'm in the middle of a game.  I'm getting some weird issue where things like my internet and e-mail icons disappear from my Start menu.  The computer occasionally boots up into strange diagnostic modes (e.g. checkdisk, or it'll start telling me that windows has recovered from a critical error).  I'm hoping I won't have to chuck this thing, but it's really going downhill fast.

Anyone have any advice?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 19, 2008, 03:42:31 PM
Sounds like a slowly but increasingly failing hard drive. You're probably getting growing bad blocks on the drive. It often manifests itself by complaints about missing files or full system/program crashes when the needed file is corrupted.


First thing to do is to check your Event Viewer: Right-click on My Computer, select Manage, then Event Viewer, then System. Check for either Warning or Erorrs with the source as disk or something similar. Even if there's nothing noted there, proceed with a disk check:

Double click on My Computer, then right-click on your hard drive and select Properties. On that window, select 'Tools'>'Error Checking'> Check Now. Select both boxes; it'll say it can't do it now, but only next time you reboot. Let it reboot.

A full scan for bad sectors and recovery will take a LONG time, so leave it for overnight.

In the morning, log on, right-click on My Computer, select Manage. There, select Event Viewer and then select Application.  Sort through the events via the time stamp on the to find the report that indicates the results of your scan disk. I forget exactly what the source is called (You'll know what I mean by source when looking at the event viewer). If there are bad blocks, it should be pretty obvious.

If you find that you continue to have errors, it means that your hard drive is progressively degrading, and its time for a new hard drive.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 19, 2008, 04:21:42 PM
Goofy question, and I don't have a lot of time to research it.  Our fiscal year is ending in about 24 hours.  :(

We have a art room in our library and we're thinking about putting a LCD TV in there to show a power point presentation that simply rotates through its panels all day.  We found a 19" Samsung LN19A650 19" High Def LCD TV w/ USB 2.0 port.

Is it possible to use this like a digital photo frame, where we don't need a PC but can put the power point on a flash drive, install that into the USB and let that run all day?  I'm thinking it won't work... as the LCD has no way to recognize what a power point is.  But I really have no idea, and don't have enough time to research it. 
No you can't expect to put an app like PowerPoint on a card and expect it to run on a non-computer. You could get a TV that can read image files like JPEGs and convert your slides into said files.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kail on November 20, 2008, 05:01:53 AM
Sounds like a slowly but increasingly failing hard drive. You're probably getting growing bad blocks on the drive. It often manifests itself by complaints about missing files or full system/program crashes when the needed file is corrupted.

Yeah, that turned up a bunch of stuff, thanks.  Probably have to get it replaced soon, but at least it works better for now, I was going nuts there for a while.  Thanks a million :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 20, 2008, 07:19:54 AM
Glad to help. Make sure you back up the data you don't want to lose.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Thrawn on November 22, 2008, 07:55:16 PM
Wife's computer died the other night.  Her screen just blinked out and gave the no signal error.  Upon restarting it everything spins up and seems to be working correctly.  I suspected the video card so I swapped it with mine (and my computers hard drive then died in an unrelated problem  :uhrr:).  Still no video, tried a different monitor, still no video.  It was then that I noticed when you turn it on you get NO post beeps at all.  So I'm suspecting cpu or MB. 

How do I determine which though?

I disconnected everything except for cpu/mb/ram and still no beep at all when I power up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 22, 2008, 08:10:11 PM
It does get power, but no video?  So lights on the board (if any) and fans all turn on?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 22, 2008, 08:16:08 PM
If it doesn't post at all then I would rule out a CPU issue.  I'd say PSU or MB.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Thrawn on November 22, 2008, 08:20:56 PM
It does get power, but no video?  So lights on the board (if any) and fans all turn on?

Everything turns on, fans, lights, drives.  But no video at all, tried multiple video cards and monitors.  Don't have any alternate cpus of the right socket type around to try though.

If it doesn't post at all then I would rule out a CPU issue.  I'd say PSU or MB.

PSU is fine as far as I can tell, so MB it probably is then!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 22, 2008, 08:46:06 PM
Maybe someone can enlighten us with the facts but you would think a MB+PSU would post a code saying WTF without even having ram, cpu, video card or hard drive installed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Thrawn on November 22, 2008, 09:40:05 PM
So on a related note then, will installing a new motherboard require a fresh install of windows?  If it's the same model of MB?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: BitWarrior on November 22, 2008, 10:16:35 PM
So on a related note then, will installing a new motherboard require a fresh install of windows?  If it's the same model of MB?

If it's the same model, nope.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on November 24, 2008, 04:50:05 AM
Maybe someone can enlighten us with the facts but you would think a MB+PSU would post a code saying WTF without even having ram, cpu, video card or hard drive installed.

Because mostly they do?

Award BIOS Beep Codes:

BeepsError MessageDescription
1long, 2 shortVideo adapter errorEither video adapter is bad or is not seated properly.  Also, check to ensure the monitor cable is connected properly
Repeating (endless loop) Memory errorCheck for improperly seated or missing memory
1long, 3short No video card or bad video RAMReseat or replace the video card
High frequency beeeps while runningOverheated CPU Check the CPU fan for proper operation. Check the case for proper air flow.
Repeating High/LowCPUEither the CPU is not seated properly or the CPU is damaged. May also be due to excess heat. Check the CPU fan or BIOS settings for proper fan speed.
   

There are many more ERROR codes that aren't ties to a beep.  If you have a good motherboard you can still access those codes, for example my motherboard has an 7 segment LED display for showing POST codes in hex.

Edit: Reference - http://www.bioscentral.com/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 26, 2008, 01:22:35 PM
Really very dumb question. Or, more like, seeking knowledge on the why of things.

For years I've managed to get my various computers to talk to each other on the Network. Trouble is I'm not exactly sure how it works. And every time I look up "how does a network work", I get all sorts of crazy cisco/IP/router wierdness. What I really need is layman's explanation.

I've got three laptops and two desktops. I configured Windows Firewall on each to accept connections from computers on the network with IP addresses in the range of .0 - .10. The router automatically assigns these as the computers turn on. Magically then the Network windows on each computer can access the shared folders on the other ones. And I can do fun VNC stuff with the server that I still need a monitor for (really pisses me off when it crashes and I have no idea if the BIOS/did-not-shutdown-right screen is up) because my kids need Christmas more than I need a cheap monitor right now.

Am I doing this right? I always see this thing called "Workgroup" that I always put the same value in on the computers. I would think that doing that would negate the need to configure Firewall to leave the port ranges open, but that's mostly because I have no idea what the purpose of Workgroup is.

Also, because I mentioned it, is there a place I can go to get fab deals on monitors. The cheapest I can get on Dell discount is $100 and none of the local Circuit Citys are closing (and the ones that are don't have anything below $150 from what folks have found out for me).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: hal on November 28, 2008, 05:00:30 PM
I do not get networking. There is something I am not doing


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 28, 2008, 09:01:01 PM
Really very dumb question. Or, more like, seeking knowledge on the why of things.

For years I've managed to get my various computers to talk to each other on the Network. Trouble is I'm not exactly sure how it works. And every time I look up "how does a network work", I get all sorts of crazy cisco/IP/router wierdness. What I really need is layman's explanation.

Seems like you have most of it down. Basically, with Windows, it is doing the heavy lifting for you. As you noted, when you put all local computers on the same Workgroup, they can tend to talk to each other and share their folders. It's not exactly secure, but it's very easy. Your firewall probably doesn't need ports open to allow this, but it depends on what apps you use (your screen sharing app may need access that being in a Workgroup doesn't grant).

There are lots of permutations of this that get more complex, but basically each computer identifies itself to the network whenever it's turned on. It says 'Hi! I'm Computer In the Kitchen, part of the Darniaq's Workgroup workgroup.' And all the other computers stay 'Hi Computer In the Kitchen! I'm in Darniaq's Workgroup too!'. And then they merrily pass packets back and forth, allowing certain types of file sharing to become available automagically.

This is enabled by the fact that they are all on the same router. If you put another router on your network (say you could connect two routers to your cable modem), the computers connected to Router 1 wouldn't be able to talk to the computers connected to Router 2. That is how we segregate computers, so their talk and traffic doesn't affect computers that don't care about whatever Router 2 computers are talking about.

Well hopefully that's a little helpful - throw out more questions if you want details on something in particular.. there are very large books out there that can tell you everything about networking, I don't want to rewrite those here. ;)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 29, 2008, 05:02:22 AM
Viin that was awesome, thanks. So the best way to ensure computers can talk to each other is first by having them on the same router and second having them in the same workgroup?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 29, 2008, 05:27:57 AM
This is enabled by the fact that they are all on the same router. If you put another router on your network (say you could connect two routers to your cable modem), the computers connected to Router 1 wouldn't be able to talk to the computers connected to Router 2.
No. If this was always true there would be no Internet. The entire purpose of routers is to connect separate networks together.

It is true that Windows Workgroup networking was not designed to span multiple subnets so if you wanted to do that you would have to jump through lots of hoops to get that to work properly.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 29, 2008, 06:07:30 AM
How do I get a second router to talk to the first one? I'm not sure if buying a better router or a second one to extend my wi-fi range is the way to go.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 29, 2008, 07:19:27 AM
How do I get a second router to talk to the first one? I'm not sure if buying a better router or a second one to extend my wi-fi range is the way to go.
You setup a route between the two of them.

Let's say Router 1 is the one that has the WAN connection (DSL/Cable/Whatever). Normally in a single router setup with a single "Internet-facing" IP from your ISP all your PCs will have their gateway setting set to Router 1's internal network IP address (a 192.168.X.X address). Router 1 has its own gateway address which is your ISP router address on the other end of your WAN connection. So when a PC sends off a packet with an IP that's not on your local network it first goes to Router 1 (since it's the gateway for that PC) and then Router 1 sends that packet off to your ISP's router since that's Router 1's default gateway.

If you want to add another router you'll need to create a new subnet and make Router 2's gateway the internal address of Router 1.

Let's say on your original network your internal IPs where in the range 192.168.0.X. E.g. Router 1's internal address was 192.168.0.1 and your PCs were 192.168.0.100 - 192.168.0.104 (for 5 computers). If you don't want to fiddle with Router 1 then for Router 2 you would set its "WAN" gateway to 192.168.0.1 (the internal address of Router 1), set its internal address to a new subnet such as 192.168.1.1 (i.e. the new 192.168.1.X subnet) and then configure its DHCP to pass out addresses to your PCs in the range of 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.104 (or you can set them manually if you aren't using DHCP).

So now your outbound IP packets on your network will take an extra "hop" going through both routers before they get to the "outside" and you did that by setting up Router 2 to pass its packets to Router 1.

However...

If you are just trying to extend the range of your wireless network, you can just get a wireless "access point" or run a wireless router in "access point" infrastructure mode (assuming it supports it) and you don't have to worry about segmenting your network since the access point acts as a "bridge" and not a "router" so everything stays on the same internal subnet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 29, 2008, 07:34:51 AM
Ah ok cool Trippy, thanks. I actually understood all of that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 29, 2008, 10:33:09 AM
This is enabled by the fact that they are all on the same router. If you put another router on your network (say you could connect two routers to your cable modem), the computers connected to Router 1 wouldn't be able to talk to the computers connected to Router 2.
No. If this was always true there would be no Internet. The entire purpose of routers is to connect separate networks together.

It is true that Windows Workgroup networking was not designed to span multiple subnets so if you wanted to do that you would have to jump through lots of hoops to get that to work properly.

You are right, I wasn't clear. My point was that, by default, two computers on different routers can't talk to each other. Once you establish a route between them, then of course you can, but that can require extra work/configuration.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 01, 2008, 02:01:59 AM
While we're on the subject of networking, does anyone know if a 20m CAT5 cable is too long? Will I have problems at that kind of length?

I ask because the 10m cables I have at the moment are a real stretch from the router to where I want to put my (soon to be delivered) PS3 and I've had all sorts of trouble with wireless in this house.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 01, 2008, 03:03:06 AM
While we're on the subject of networking, does anyone know if a 20m CAT5 cable is too long? Will I have problems at that kind of length?
No. The spec allows for cables up to 100m.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 01, 2008, 07:42:11 AM
I have a 35m CAT5 ethernet cable in my closet for emergencies.  Works great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 01, 2008, 08:34:15 AM
Awesome thanks folks, 2 cables ordered, girlfriend looking forward to a living room that looks slightly less like a LAN party  :awesome_for_real:

While I'm here, can anyone recommend a NAS enclosure? I've currently got a 2-SATA drive D-Link DNS-323 which, to use the technical term, sucks monkey cocks in Hell. I'm after something cheap that can take 2 SATA drives (pref. in a RAID array) and that I can safely and easily use to stream media to my shiny new PS3.

Forget that, worked it out, crappy D-Link NAS working fine with PS3. I am happy bunny.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on December 01, 2008, 11:34:03 AM
Here's something odd: I go to add another device to my MAC filter list and I get a dead-page error from the router. The heck? So I try going to a few other places on the admin page (Linksys, WRT54G v8) and while I can go to most areas, any changes I try and make can't be saved because the pages being accessed no longer exist. I just tried upgrading the Firmware and even that conked out because the page it tried to hit is no longer there. Going to try a factory reset, but I wanted to put this out there in case these are my last words ever.

Edit: factory reset did reset all settings. But nothings being saved. Is this router hosed?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 01, 2008, 12:13:35 PM
sounds like agressive browser caching. try a different browser?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on December 01, 2008, 12:43:01 PM
Jeezus, you're right! (the shock is not about you being right but yours being the answer). Chrome was "Aggressively caching". IE7 worked fine. Wish I had the patience to wait for your reply :-P Ah well, wanted to take advantage of the gigabyte cards in my two desktops anyway...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 01, 2008, 01:43:20 PM
Futzing with my WRT54GL is the only time I recommend IE.  Haven't tried Chrome but Firefox doesn't really work.  I actually set my home page in IE as 192.168.1.1. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on December 02, 2008, 08:09:25 AM
Yea. Until yesterday I only ever needed IE for webmail for work's Outlook (since it works with MS Office, I can format emails whereas under Firefox, Chrome and others, I can only do ascii). Now I have two tabs that open automatically: webmail and the router page.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 02, 2008, 11:19:48 AM
While I'm here, can anyone recommend a NAS enclosure? I've currently got a 2-SATA drive D-Link DNS-323 which, to use the technical term, sucks monkey cocks in Hell. I'm after something cheap that can take 2 SATA drives (pref. in a RAID array) and that I can safely and easily use to stream media to my shiny new PS3.

Forget that, worked it out, crappy D-Link NAS working fine with PS3. I am happy bunny.

OK, I take it back, this NAS is rubbish and is causing me much hassle.

Can anyone recommend a decent NAS enclosure that won't cost me a fortune?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 02, 2008, 01:22:52 PM
My experience with cheap NAS recently has led me to the conclusion that you are wasting your time.

Get a mini case, MB, cheap processor, linux distro and use that instead.  It will cost (MUCH) less and work (MUCH) better.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: hal on December 02, 2008, 03:49:25 PM
I got an Ipodtouch. This thing is taking over my life. I now need wifi in my ghetto. Please to advise a wifi setup. Money is not a huge object but lets not get stupid. I have DSL a 4 port router ( 2 puters an xbox connected) . I can not think of anything else you would need to recommend so please to be asking if I left out anything. Probally upgrading main box soonish so that could be an option though I would like a slap it on and go if that is a do able thing. Thank you in advance for your responce.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 02, 2008, 11:33:16 PM
My experience with cheap NAS recently has led me to the conclusion that you are wasting your time.

Get a mini case, MB, cheap processor, linux distro and use that instead.  It will cost (MUCH) less and work (MUCH) better.

Damn. I can really do without that kind of hassle atm. Especially since I'm an utter linux noob.

The DNS-323 works most of the time, but occasionally just has a freak out and needs rebooting or the UPnP media server refreshing, which annoyingly only seems to happen 5 minutes before the end of a film  :mob:

I'll stick with it until (workingness - annoyances) < 0

Edit: can't even get fake maths right!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 03, 2008, 03:34:59 AM
I got an Ipodtouch. This thing is taking over my life. I now need wifi in my ghetto. Please to advise a wifi setup. Money is not a huge object but lets not get stupid. I have DSL a 4 port router ( 2 puters an xbox connected) . I can not think of anything else you would need to recommend so please to be asking if I left out anything. Probally upgrading main box soonish so that could be an option though I would like a slap it on and go if that is a do able thing. Thank you in advance for your responce.

http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=14149.msg556241#msg556241


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 03, 2008, 12:06:18 PM
So, I'm looking to upgrade my LCD monitor. What I have is a 20 inch widescreen NEC 20wgx2. I love it, since it does both gaming and video well. I get fairly good color reproduction, good response time, and more crucially, very good video quality for DVDs etc. But I want a bigger monitor. 24" or more. However, its very hard to actually find any monitors on display, and you have to go by reviews, both user and professional, that often leave me with several questions unanswered.

I'm considering this NEC MultiSync LCD2690WUXi (http://xtknight.50webs.com/lcd26/). Its expensive, and an H-IPS type rather than a TN varietal, so although I'm unconcerned about video quality, gaming quality may suffer. Anyone have experience with that type of monitor, the IPS kind?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 03, 2008, 08:42:52 PM
If you like your current TN I would stick with that - the H-IPS will give you ghosting and other issues with fast moving games. EVE would probably be fine, but COD4 would get annoying. Not worth the extra money, IMHO.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 03, 2008, 09:06:50 PM
The 20WGX2 is an S-IPS panel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 03, 2008, 10:38:31 PM
Ya, that's why I'm wondering about H-IPS. My current S-IPS has no ghosting or motion blur at all. If it has to compromise on anything, its color fidelity. I have an older NEC that my GF uses that has just staggeringly beautiful colors. Games like EQ2 look like entirely different games on hers than on my 20wgx2. Then again, video looks like caca on hers, so we've been content with the 20wgx2 as a multi-function screen, since it excells at video, does well at games, and has 'decent' color rendition.

But heck if I know how a S-IPS is different from an H-IPS. I can read the technical explanations till I'm blue in the face, but till I hear someone who's had one, and describes it a bit to me, I don't think I'll really 'get' H-IPS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 04, 2008, 09:26:25 AM
TN is crap, other than cheap there is no longer a reason to specifically want a TN panel.  Ghosting on IPS panels was more or less resolved with the introduction of S-IPS and H-IPS is supposed to improve on that.  There are a few nitpickers out there that scan at superhuman speeds and swear they still see ghosting on on S-IPS panels, you said you used an S-IPS and thought it was great then you probably aren't one of the few who prefer TN.

Either way buy it from some place that has a no questions asked if returned within xx days full refund policy and you will be good to go.

I have heard excellent things about the Dell 27" (2709W) and my personal experience with the Dell 24" (2407W) has left me with 0 complaints.

For reference here is some easy to understand information on panel types:

Excellent pre H-IPS post on Hardforums (http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1039222)

Some great Wikipedia info (covers H-IPS) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD#IPS)


edit: my Dell 24 is a S-PVA panel (not sure what they use now), I also have a dell 20" (S-IPS) that sits right next to it, I prefer the color/contrast/brightness of the 24" S-PVA but part of that may be from a better backlight.

Out of curiosity I looked up what the 2709W uses and it is also a S-PVA panel (6 ms g2g response time).  Also this is a pretty cool site for looking up what type of panel is used in your monitor: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/ (http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 04, 2008, 10:09:25 AM
For some reason I thought my Dell wide screen LCD was TN, but it's not!

Dell 2007WFP   16ms or 8ms G2G   20"WS LG.Philips S-IPS (LM201W01) or Samsung S-PVA (LTM201M1)

So nvrmnd about the TN. From that site, the article on monitor types:
Quote
[IPS] response times were traditionally behind those of TN Film and VA panel variants, but modern IPS panels including the new generation of Horizontal IPS (H-IPS), Enhanced S-IPS and Advanced Super IPS (AS-IPS) panels can offer responsiveness to rival both, thanks primarily to overdrive technologies.

More info:

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/panel_technologies.htm



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 04, 2008, 02:53:52 PM
I was looking at that Dell ultrasharp 2709wfp, but I'm hearing reports that the dot pitch is just too big if you're sitting at a table with it. The 2408 gets some pretty mixed reviews, especially in regards to color saturation, so I'm a bit skittish about it. I am just a princess with a pea when it comes to this stuff. What's the point of blowing hundreds on a video card if your monitor looks like crud. Its like buying a villa with a splendid set of bay windows looking out on a dump if you don't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on December 16, 2008, 08:14:40 AM
Question for Excel Gurus:

Here's my situation: I have a worksheet to calculate a percentage of a credit applied to part of an order. The sheet works great. Once it calculates the appropriate refund though, I want to give the users a nice simple summary of the calculation that they can copy and paste in to their notes. The issue is in the formatting.

Here is the formula I am using to create the "calculation":

="$"&A3&" - ($"&A3&" "&B3&" / $"&A10&" total order = "&C3&" X Total Credits of $"&E3&") = $"&G3&" prorated pricing"

Here is what is displayed in cell C3: 48.02% and for cell G3: $1.32 on the worksheet. Those cells have had thier formating adjusted to "percentage, 2 decimals" and "accounting, 2 decimals"

However, here is the result of my formula above:

$60 - ($60 MS / $124.95 total order = 0.480192076830732 X Total Credits of $-122.21) = $1.31572629051621 prorated pricing

I have attempted to adjust the Formating for the cell that my formula is in; I've set it to Numbers, with two decimal places, but it doesn't change anything. Anyone have any idea how I can get my formula to not display 15 decimal places...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 16, 2008, 08:34:44 AM
I'm not an excel guru at all though we do use it for some things.  I think I would make another cell that displays the value after it's been rounded/truncated to 2 decimal places.

Your values will stay accurate but the one for the customer will be an 'estimate' (in your example something has to happen to that half cent).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on December 16, 2008, 08:44:18 AM
I tried using another cell set to =c3 for example, but I still end up with a result as shown above. It would work if I took c3, copied it, and then used "paste special" in to another cell, but I don't know of any way to automate that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 16, 2008, 09:15:37 AM
No, I was specifically saying to use the ROUND or TRUNC functions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 16, 2008, 11:49:28 AM
I'm going to guess because the cell contents is "$x.xxxxxx prorated pricing" that it is treating it as text.  Can you put the "prorated pricing" in an adjacent cell and see if that helps?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on December 16, 2008, 11:57:44 AM
No, I was specifically saying to use the ROUND or TRUNC functions.

Missed that earlier... ROUND worked perfectly, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on December 23, 2008, 07:12:41 PM
My experience with cheap NAS recently has led me to the conclusion that you are wasting your time.

Get a mini case, MB, cheap processor, linux distro and use that instead.  It will cost (MUCH) less and work (MUCH) better.
I recently picked up an IOMega StorCenter NAS. I'm very very happy. It was cheap, has 1 TB storage with RAID, and basically just works when you plug it in. I priced out rolling my own, and concluded that it was pretty hard to beat this building my own.

EDIT: Just checked, $299 for 1 TB storage including NAS enclosure (http://store.iomega.com/section?SID=fff8331ed86aabb14eab68252150cde5725:4760&secid=40399).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 23, 2008, 11:28:45 PM
That looks great, my only problem with it is that it's fixed drives, i.e. it's not just an enclosure. I want to be able to swap out the drives in a couple of years time when Gb per £ has dropped to half it's current rate, as seems to be the rule  :why_so_serious:

However, since I upgraded my D-Link NAS firmware and told it to auto-refresh the uPnP media server twice a day 99% of my problems with it have gone away! Many thanks for the link though, it's appreciated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on December 24, 2008, 06:50:18 AM
No worries, glad you fixed your problem!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 01, 2009, 05:37:54 PM
I'm re-settng up a Win XP box to serve up music and movies, and like that my X360 can pull content from Windows Media Center. Unfortunately I do not have Media Center on XP. And now that I found an iPhone app that can control Media Center, I'd rather go that route than use iTunes and the Remote app.

So, how can I get Media Center for XP?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lucas on January 02, 2009, 05:46:33 AM
Something very strange is happening with my Pioneer DVD-RW DVR-111DBK . Beside SecuROM raping, I think the "burner" part of it is totally fried, and the system think everything is messed up.

Now, I'm no hardware expert and also I still have to try to replace it with another one (will do it next week) in order to see if the problems listed below still happen, but meanwhile I would like to know your opinion.

BIOS  (AmiBIOS) recognizes it fine; the Windows Vista (32-bit, SP1) Device Manager recognizes it fine and it says it works correctly, no code error or yellow exclamation mark. Now, the latest firmware should be 1.29, September 2006. But here's what is happening:
----

Device Manager:
- When I look up at the properties of the DVD and click on drivers, there is just the generic Microsoft listing, with the date of june 2006 and the driver version of 6.0.6001.18000. So I tried to check automatically for drivers, to no avail, it said it was already updated. So I went to the Pioneer website, downloaded the above mentioned 1.29 firmware, unzipped it correctly, ran the program, but it doesn't work, it says "available target is not found". (yes, I'm sure it's the correct firmware). And yes, I also tried to download an earlier version of the firmware.

If I look at the "details" of my DVD, in "ID Hardware", it says this:

IDE\CdRomPIONEER_DVD-RW__DVR-111D________________1.23____
IDE\PIONEER_DVD-RW__DVR-111D________________1.23____
IDE\CdRomPIONEER_DVD-RW__DVR-111D________________
PIONEER_DVD-RW__DVR-111D________________1.23____
GenCdRom


Is that the latest firmware version installed? And why it doesn't show up in the "Driver" section?
---

Nero:
Also, If I load Nero SmartStart and I try to check the speed of my DVD drive or test it altogether, there is a pop-up window saying "impossible to find the CD Rom unit". Also, if I try to create a Data DVD with Nero, in the "current burner" section it just says "Image Recorder" and the DVD Rom is not listed.


Gaming:
By the way, the problems I'm going to mention were *already* present without Daemon Tools (installed yesterday, trial edition)  and Nero (which I reinstalled yesterday).

- Autoplay runs fine, installation of games runs fine. I only had a problem with the installation of Fallout 3, something a lot of people experienced, looking at the official website.

Currently, I can play Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout 3 and Pro Evolution Soccer 9 with a No CD crack. Why? Because if if try to run the normal exe (through the game launcher or forcing the exe from the game directory), it keeps me asking for the CD even if it is already in . Like I said, this problem was already there even without any cd burning or whatever program installed (regarding nero, with the previous installation I also made sure of cleaning the registry).

Well, that's about it :(




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 04, 2009, 07:11:11 AM
So, how can I get Media Center for XP?

Nevermind. Looks like Windows Media Player 11 effectively does the same thing, at least insofar as the X360 showing stuff is concerned. And there's a few iPhone options for controlling that (will be experimenting with IntelliRemote first). Now I get to see just how much I can push from this ancient PC :wink:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on January 04, 2009, 10:37:03 PM
My new PC is coming on Tuesday with Vista 64 installed. Is there anything important I should tell them about how to install it or can I change any badly chosen options once I get the computer without having to reinstall?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 05, 2009, 11:44:49 AM
So, how can I get Media Center for XP?

Nevermind. Looks like Windows Media Player 11 effectively does the same thing, at least insofar as the X360 showing stuff is concerned. And there's a few iPhone options for controlling that (will be experimenting with IntelliRemote first). Now I get to see just how much I can push from this ancient PC :wink:

If you don't want to shell out cash for an XP license or Media Center you can easily set up a linux box that can serve videos and music to an XBOX 360 (or PS 3) using a UPnP Media Server.  I use UShare (http://ushare.geexbox.org/), It won't transcode from one format to another, like Trippy was looking for earlier, but if you have fairly standard formats (.avi, .mov, .wmv, etc...) the XBOX 360 will play them natively.

It's easy peasy setup, don't cost nothing, other than hardware, and works great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 07, 2009, 01:33:10 PM
I think there is something wrong with your DVD drive. :awesome_for_real:

Firmware and drivers are not the same thing.  Firmware lives on the drive unit, and if you cannot flash it then there is a hardware problem.  Drivers live in the operating system and let softwares talk to hardwares.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on January 07, 2009, 01:51:28 PM
So, how can I get Media Center for XP?

Nevermind. Looks like Windows Media Player 11 effectively does the same thing, at least insofar as the X360 showing stuff is concerned. And there's a few iPhone options for controlling that (will be experimenting with IntelliRemote first). Now I get to see just how much I can push from this ancient PC :wink:

WMP 11 works just fine, it sets up the required service when you install it. Just don't try connecting through the media center area on the 360 dashboard. Go to "my videos" and connect through there.

I currently feed media from an old P4 that I slapped a half TB drive in to via wireless, and it works great. Other than when my router decides to spontaneously reset itself...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on January 07, 2009, 05:25:37 PM
Folks -- what's the criteria for choosing a good case? 

I plan to start a new PC build over the next few months and  I'd be willing to pay <$325. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 07, 2009, 05:40:17 PM
Depends on your needs. Quiet? Cool looking? Small? High end (hot) components going in? HTPC?

Some guidelines are nice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 07, 2009, 05:49:01 PM
I'm building a new forum style for my guild board which just went to phpBB3. However, just like when I did one for phpBB2, I had to hack my way through it. So I'm learning all over again.

I have the style loaded up and it works (incomplete though it is). I can upload new images just fine and they will appear on the page when I hit refresh. However, no matter how many times I change and upload a css file, none of the changes appear to be made. So while I figure out what else I might have screwed up, is it possible that I need to uninstall the style from my admin panel and reinstall it so that it reads the new css file info?

And yes, someone who actually knew what the hell they were talking about would probably be able to ask that question the right way.  :grin:

Edit 1: Wierd. Ok, so phpBB3 Admin Control Panel lets you edit html and css files within it's own UI. And that works ok. But I cannot work offline and then upload/replace the data on the server. Maybe I DO need to uninstall the style and then reinstall. But that's a pita, so I'll probably just do all code adjustments in the phpBB3 UI. Unless someone tells me otherwise


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 07, 2009, 06:05:10 PM
What's the board URL (assuming it's public)?

When you edit things like stylesheets the changes don't always get reflected when you refresh because of page/element caching. To force a reload without mucking around with HTTP headers and forcing people to constantly clear their caches you can append a changing query string on the end of the URL which tricks the browser into thinking it needs to reload it. It's possible the UI admin tool does something of that sort for you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 07, 2009, 06:17:53 PM
Ah, yea, so, like, complicated then :-) It's working well with the Admin CP so I'll just keep doing that. Much faster too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 07, 2009, 07:20:36 PM
just name your new css file with a version number and every time you upload a new css go into the admin tool and load it.  Most forums let you point to a custom css file.  Once you think you are finished just remove all the old versions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on January 08, 2009, 11:25:03 AM
Depends on your needs. Quiet? Cool looking? Small? High end (hot) components going in? HTPC?

Some guidelines are nice.

Sorry.  Quiet and cooling, which I realize may be exclusionary.  Full tower, I guess.  I am hoping for moderately high-end components. This is for gaming, not HTPC.

Basically, I don't care what it looks like or how heavy it is, I just was hoping people were opting for 1 or 2 models.  I have no clue what's best at the moment.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 08, 2009, 08:28:10 PM
I was using the Cosmos (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119138) case until recently. Huge Full tower, quiet (with Scythe s-flex fans) and cool, except not the best harddrive cooling. Not terrible, especially with the alternative fan-shroud placement. But it is very big, and very space age looking. I stopped using it as when I rebuilt my desk, I ended up about 1.5" too shot for the case to fit where I wanted it. The Antec p180/p182 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129025) is also another big, heavy case. I retired one of those due to heat issues, but it was with 2 very hot video cards. Not as quiet as the Cosmos, even with quiet fans, and the hard drive air flow went to hell if you closed the front door. I'm currently using a HAF (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119160) for the gaming machine, and an Elite 330 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119115) for the server. The 330 is small and quiet, the HAF is huge, very cool, and moderately quiet (again, with Scythe s-flex fans) The loudest bit is the 4870.

The other cases I've used recently are the Antec Lanboys (meh) the Antec 900 (loud, annoying to replace big fan) Antec Sonata (meh) and a Lian-li midtower I wasn't impressed with. Too flimsy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 08, 2009, 08:42:13 PM
Depends on your needs. Quiet? Cool looking? Small? High end (hot) components going in? HTPC?

Some guidelines are nice.

Sorry.  Quiet and cooling, which I realize may be exclusionary.  Full tower, I guess.  I am hoping for moderately high-end components. This is for gaming, not HTPC.

Basically, I don't care what it looks like or how heavy it is, I just was hoping people were opting for 1 or 2 models.  I have no clue what's best at the moment.  Thanks.
If you need quiet and cool start with http://silentpcreview.com/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bandit on January 09, 2009, 07:33:09 AM
Can anyone recommend a good free online storage site?  I have a colleague who is driving me crazy about his computer problems.  Basically it sounds like his OS is pooched and he has 5 years of family digital photos on the computer that he needs.  A usb key won't work, burning to CD won't work, home networking to his laptop won't work. I am avoiding having to take his hard drive and slave it on to one of my computers.  Apparently he can get online, so I thought he might be able to transfer to his laptop via a storage site.  Any help would be much appreciated!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 09, 2009, 08:06:16 AM
Can he not buy himself a terrabyte drive and slave it inside his own machine?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bandit on January 09, 2009, 08:15:28 AM
No he is completely computer illiterate, that would require me to go to his house and install and slave it.  Just trying to avoid that option, just looking for a quicker solution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 09, 2009, 09:51:27 AM
An external USB drive?  Plug it in and copy everything over?

Edit: An internet storage site is probably not going to work for transferring a large amount of data simply because your friends 'unlimited' broadband connection probably actually has a limit.

1 TB USB external WD ($119.99):

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136321

If it's actually not that much data he could use gmail accounts for storage...

edit2: http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/01/how-to-use-your-gmail-account-as-a-personal-file-server/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 09, 2009, 09:55:00 AM
Dropbox! You'll have to be careful though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 09, 2009, 10:00:38 AM
Dropbox! You'll have to be careful though.

Careful of what? They don't steal my pictures do they?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 09, 2009, 10:06:03 AM
Well, he was said to be computer illiterate. I don't trust illiterates with even the most simple of computerized actions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 09, 2009, 10:12:21 AM
Well, he was said to be computer illiterate. I don't trust illiterates with even the most simple of computerized actions.

That's true - if he's really illiterate than you are pretty much screwed and will have to do it yourself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 09, 2009, 10:23:02 AM
Seems to be a space limit on dropbox.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bandit on January 09, 2009, 10:57:23 AM
Hmmm, thanks for the suggestions...

Problem with USB storage device is apparently his USB ports are not reading anything at all.  He tried a couple of USB storage keys and other USB devices to no success.

Drop Box, seems to be alright, but he also indicated that he tried to install AVG to run a test on his comp and it wouldn't let him install anything and drop box has a client install.  He has indicated about the only thing he could do was basically get online.  His OS (XP) seems to be completely borked.

It just looks like I am going to have to bite the bullet to slave it.  The help is much appreciated though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 09, 2009, 11:10:23 AM
it's getting to the point where computers are cheap enough and people are ungrateful enough that when they get themselves into these situations i just tell em to go buy a new pc.  Slave the old hard drive into the new pc and copy all the needed files over.  If you fix it then it will just be your fault when he malwares his ass into a corner again.

I wonder if a bart pe disc would make a USB drive accessible or if he screwed up some hardware.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bandit on January 09, 2009, 11:30:03 AM
I wonder if a bart pe disc would make a USB drive accessible or if he screwed up some hardware.

Wow, I remember using that bert a long time ago....never thought of it again.  That may work, not to get the pc working, but just get those pic files off.  Great suggestion.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 09, 2009, 04:03:34 PM
Time to do a bit of early spring cleaning on my computer and do a format/reinstall.  I have an unopened XP Pro 64 case sitting on my desk, looking at me longingly with sad eyes.

Computer is Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, 4GB RAM, 8800GTS G92 512 in SLI.  Gaming rig.

XP Pro 64 vs Vista Home Premium. 

WWF13D.

(what would f13 do)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 09, 2009, 04:20:42 PM
Is your Vista Home Premium 64-bit or 32-bit?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 09, 2009, 04:56:35 PM
64 bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 09, 2009, 05:04:27 PM
Go with Vista.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 09, 2009, 06:16:59 PM
Huh.  That's surprising.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 09, 2009, 10:21:44 PM
How so? Half the Vista-rage out there is from folks that can't handle any sort of a change. At first it was somewhat justified, since Vista had some issues, but they've been ironed out. Vista is a problem for older hardware, but on good hardware, it runs well. Especially 64 bit. Besides, XP driver support for 64 bit has had problems, many left mouldering unresolved. From what I hear, Vista 64 bit has good driver support.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 09, 2009, 10:44:23 PM
To be honest, the only issue I've had thus far with Vista Prem is the error on install that occasionally pops up if you have more than 2GB of RAM.  Other than that, no issues. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 11, 2009, 04:46:42 PM
Depends on your needs. Quiet? Cool looking? Small? High end (hot) components going in? HTPC?

Some guidelines are nice.

Sorry.  Quiet and cooling, which I realize may be exclusionary.  Full tower, I guess.  I am hoping for moderately high-end components. This is for gaming, not HTPC.

Basically, I don't care what it looks like or how heavy it is, I just was hoping people were opting for 1 or 2 models.  I have no clue what's best at the moment.  Thanks.
If you need quiet and cool start with http://silentpcreview.com/


My new gear in my old case (mid 90's inwin crap) was overheating so I decided to take the plunge, I wanted something affordable, quiet, cool , tool free and didn't look like it belonged in a pimps car.  Ended up with this: Cooler Master Sileo 500 (http://www.amazon.com/Cooler-Master-Sileo-Tower-Black/dp/B001NABWZI).  It is insulated for sound, has front and rear fans, and other than the mother board and psu you can add/remove all the hardware sans tools.  I also upgraded my stock cpu heatsink/fan to a Zalman 9500.

Only been a few hours but I had both cores pegged to 100% for most of those 2 hours and my temp has hovered between 46-48 the entire time (seem to hover at 42 when the pc is at rest).  It is noticably quieter than my last case/cpu fan.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: w00key on January 11, 2009, 04:47:16 PM
XP Pro:
+ Got remote desktop support. You have to pay for ultimate in Vista to get that (But I did. The other shiny features like VSC, Encrypted folders are pretty nice to have too)
+ Lower memory footprint (but hey, that's where the 64-bit support comes in. Get ram while it's cheap, 4-8G)

Vista:
+ Shinier. The graphical framework supports fancy stuff, but the built in [win]+[tab] is meh at best. Get switcher the osx expose clone from http://insentient.net/
(http://insentient.net/Files/Screenshots/switcher-2704-tile_t.jpg)
+ Way better driver support. Everything I've bought in the last 2 years just work. No one releases xp64 drivers anymore.
+ New Kernel, better scheduler (cycle delta counter), better memory management (memory priority). SP1 backported the Windows Server 2008 kernel to Vista.
+ Better application support. Some installers like the MSN 9 just breaks on XP64.
+ Execution context for GPU. Think CPU & Memory scheduler for CPU/RAM, but for 3D stuff. Is a big deal when you run multiple clients (WoW :P) at the same time.
+ No more users running around as root. Sudo setup.exe's (via UAC) or Sudo su (open an administrative prompt) before you can mess up your pc.

Same:
- Stability. I never had a XP or Vista crash because of software errors, any instability is always traced back to hardware faults.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 11, 2009, 04:52:00 PM
XP Pro:
+ Got remote desktop support. You have to pay for ultimate in Vista to get that (But I did. The other shiny features like VSC, Encrypted folders are pretty nice to have too)

For awhile I was a bit confused by this feature, thinking I wouldn't be able to remote desktop to my work machine if I had XP or Vista Home editions at home, come to find out they are talking about the ability to recieve remote desktop connections.  Since I never remote desktop to my home machine (only from) this is pretty much a non issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 11, 2009, 06:05:41 PM
XP Pro:
+ Got remote desktop support. You have to pay for ultimate in Vista to get that (But I did. The other shiny features like VSC, Encrypted folders are pretty nice to have too)
Vista Business, the equivalent of XP Professional, has Remote Desktop Support too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 12, 2009, 07:33:11 AM
Does anyone know if there is a flavor of VNC that supports Vista well?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 12, 2009, 03:26:30 PM
Does anyone know if there is a flavor of VNC that supports Vista well?
Do you just need a viewer or do you want to run a VNC server on Vista?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 13, 2009, 05:04:01 AM
Does anyone know if there is a flavor of VNC that supports Vista well?
Do you just need a viewer or do you want to run a VNC server on Vista?

Run the server on Vista.  I looked at RealVNC (Which I use at work) but there was grumbling in the search results about it's Vista support.

I'm not really asking anyone to do research for me.  I'll google around, I was just wondering if anyone had already gone through the effort and had some insights.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 13, 2009, 05:10:08 AM
I've only used the RealVNC viewer to connect to a VNC server running under Linux.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 14, 2009, 06:00:07 AM
Wireless security: MAC address whitelist is totally awesome, right?  Even without WPA?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2009, 06:03:28 AM
MAC addresses can be faked, so it offers some protection but by itself it won't necessarily keep out a determined hacker.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 14, 2009, 06:45:06 AM
How determined would a hacker have to be in order to nab one of my MACs?  Sure, they can be faked but it might take a while to guess the right one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 14, 2009, 07:54:41 AM
How determined would a hacker have to be in order to nab one of my MACs?  Sure, they can be faked but it might take a while to guess the right one.

I'm not so sure about a wireless network.  I don't know enough about how they figure out who to talk to to say yes or no.  Routers build an ARP cache of MAC addresses of the computers that connect to them (MAC is the physical device, IP is the logical address, you need both to talk to someone) and I don't know that someone with a wireless device wandering around collecting handshakes can't grab MACs.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 14, 2009, 08:38:39 AM
pretty sure kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/) can grab MAC & IP addresses out of the air.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 14, 2009, 09:37:31 AM
hmmm shouldn't this read as 2997mhz (333.00 x 9.0) for the frequency?  I didn't adjust any clock settings when I set everything up shouldn't the chipset (mboard: ASUS P5Q SE PLUS 775 P45/ICH10) autodetect the proper setting for the CPU? 

(http://www.devotia.com/img/coretemp.JPG)

Did I get a bogus proc or is the mainboard automatically setting itself to the correct freq expecting too much?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 14, 2009, 09:50:28 AM
It might be the BIOS, too.  Mine had to be flashed to read my Quad correctly.  I still need to do flash the newest one (stupid comp not allowing a USB flash boot ><) to get better compatability.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 14, 2009, 10:13:40 AM
It might be the BIOS, too.  Mine had to be flashed to read my Quad correctly.  I still need to do flash the newest one (stupid comp not allowing a USB flash boot ><) to get better compatability.

Went into the bios and it was reading correctly there, saved and launched the os and it is now correct there as well.  Never actually flashed the bios but I may not have gone back in the bios since installing all the motherboard and chipset crap in windows.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miguel on January 14, 2009, 11:18:19 AM
Problem with USB storage device is apparently his USB ports are not reading anything at all.  He tried a couple of USB storage keys and other USB devices to no success.

A System Rescue CD (http://www.sysresccd.org/Main_Page) comes in very handy for these kinds of things.  It has bailed me out of huge messes more times than I can count.

The newer ones can mount NTFS partitions as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2009, 03:06:50 PM
hmmm shouldn't this read as 2997mhz (333.00 x 9.0) for the frequency?  I didn't adjust any clock settings when I set everything up shouldn't the chipset (mboard: ASUS P5Q SE PLUS 775 P45/ICH10) autodetect the proper setting for the CPU? 

(http://www.devotia.com/img/coretemp.JPG)

Did I get a bogus proc or is the mainboard automatically setting itself to the correct freq expecting too much?

That looks like SpeedStep kicking in. Try disabling it in your BIOS and see if that bumps the multiplier back up.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 14, 2009, 08:40:54 PM
hmmm shouldn't this read as 2997mhz (333.00 x 9.0) for the frequency?  I didn't adjust any clock settings when I set everything up shouldn't the chipset (mboard: ASUS P5Q SE PLUS 775 P45/ICH10) autodetect the proper setting for the CPU? 

..pic..

Did I get a bogus proc or is the mainboard automatically setting itself to the correct freq expecting too much?
That looks like SpeedStep kicking in. Try disabling it in your BIOS and see if that bumps the multiplier back up.

nah fixed now, speedstep was never enabled i just thing the proc was initially misread by the bios, or maybe i never gave it the chance to be set.  I recall going into the bios after setting everything up and everything looked fine i may not have saved after that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 18, 2009, 05:09:47 PM
HomePlug.  Somehow I managed to forget all about this technology but it could solve my LAN problem.  Has anyone had any experience with this?  Gotchas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on January 19, 2009, 07:52:13 PM
I have a problem that is DRIVING ME NUTS.

My Mom bought a laptop around November last year. Everything was working fine, but for the past week or so, every time she logs into the network, everyone else has repeat drops. It makes it impossible to do anything except read web pages. No setting have been changed on the router, or the laptop (according to my Mother and Step-Father). The only difference is that she has recently been using her laptop in the spare bedroom (right across the hall from my room).

What could be causing this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 19, 2009, 08:35:39 PM
Well your post is very vague so I'm going to assume we're talking about some sort of wireless network here. As such it could be a bazillion different problems but if I had to guess I would say her wireless adapter is set to a different protocol/configuration than the other computers. E.g. hers is set to B and everybody else is on G or vice versa and your/their wireless router is a POS and can't handle a mixed network properly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 20, 2009, 10:19:19 AM
Being a Parent and all, she could also have a worm that is flooding the network.  Router difficulties are more likely, but if it only happens with her machine being plugged in, something is going on there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 22, 2009, 08:01:18 AM
I have a XHTML doc and a CSS that work great.  I move these to another location on the same web server, and now only some of the styles seem to be working.  Most do not.  Since at least the font-family style works, I'm going to assume the .css is in the right place and perms are fine.  Mrh?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on January 22, 2009, 08:05:43 AM
I would assume that somewhere in the document you have absolute links instead of relative links.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 22, 2009, 08:23:30 AM
I do/did use absolute links when defining the .css location in the .html.  The bit where it would use the correct font was throwing me off since a bad path should mean I get Times instead of Arial.

Anyway, I changed to a relative path and now it's not even reading in the font-family style.  I cp -p the .css to the same dir as the .html, changed the link to both "./gla.css" and "gla.css" and got zero style.  I'm going to have to suspect Apache at this point because it works just fine in the other dir structure, and also I don't have any other ideas.  How about a related question: is there a place where such errors are logged?

EDIT: The problem was in meat instead of code.  Never trust meat, especially if it is someone else's meat.  Basically the CSS file did not have the contents I expected.  All is well now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 22, 2009, 10:38:12 PM
So here's something for you...

Recently reformatted my HD.  Clean install of Vista Premium.  Everything updated, all drivers, etc.  Reinstalled a few games from Steam, the SOE launcher, and that's basically it.  Here I am trying to run Ventrilo, but it keeps crashing due to a problem with the Skype add-in for Internet Explorer.  I don't have Skype.  I've never had Skype.  I don't have the add-in in IE. 

Vent crashes because of it, IE crashes because of it, SOE Launcher crashes.   

Free and clear of viri, malware, etc.

Also, trying to log into gmail is an excercise in frustration.  All it does it refresh.

Double You Tee Eff, mate?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 22, 2009, 11:13:16 PM
uhm, what's saying that its skype? And what does the Event Viewer say?

(in case you don't know, you find the Event Viewer by right-clicking 'computer', selecting 'Manage', then looking under Windows Logs in Event Viewer. There look at both System and Application


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 23, 2009, 02:54:02 AM
When it crashes, it gives you the option of closing the program or checking online for a solution.  Clicking online for a solution brings up this page:


Here is more crash info:



Here is the Event Viewer says specifically about the Ventrilo crash:
Faulting application Ventrilo.exe, version 3.0.4.0, time stamp 0x49186cdc, faulting module ntdll.dll,
version 6.0.6001.18000, time stamp 0x4791adec, exception code 0xc0000374, fault offset 0x00000000000a6e97,
process id 0x83c, application start time 0x01c97d46ce212322.

I have what seems to be in the hundreds of error messages for DistributedCOM, that pretty much all say the same thing:The machine-default permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID
{BC866CF2-5486-41F7-B46B-9AA49CF3EBB1}
 to the user NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE SID (S-1-5-20) from address LocalHost (Using LRPC). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.

All I know to do is do a fresh install of Vista .


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on January 23, 2009, 04:47:17 AM
If the problem is with a add-in in IE just disable the Add-in.  You should be able to go to Control Panel > Internet Options and disable the Add-in from there, or at least see if it's loading.  You could also download Hijack This! and disable it that way if it's doing something in IE it shouldn't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 23, 2009, 07:39:50 AM
Uhm, I think he's already said that there is no skype, and there is no identifiable add-in. I think that Vista is confusing the vent module with skype. Its possible that they use some of the same .dll files and hence Vista thinks its Skype.

For starters, I would uninstall Ventrilo, then run CCleaner's registry 'fixer'. Be sure to back up the registry changes (the program lets you do that). Restrart the machine.

Also, for the heck of it, go through the add-ins in IE and see if there are any unneeded add-ins active.

Finally, reinstall Vent and see how it goes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 23, 2009, 10:37:18 AM
Did a reinstall of vent, but no luck.  I'll check out the CCleaner registery fixer and see what happens. 

Something hasn't been right with the install since the beginning, so I'm thinking about just redoing everything this weekend and seeing what happens.  Vista only takes about 30 minutes to install, and about 2 hrs to update so, won't take long.

Edit:  Thanks for the help, btw.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 23, 2009, 11:04:56 AM
What's the best way to calibrate your monitor? Just got my dell monitor, but it's 50 on all settings and looks terrible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 23, 2009, 11:57:16 AM
I use AVIA and DVE, along with a set of filters for color. Just set it like I would an LCD tv.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 23, 2009, 02:58:48 PM
I'm beginning to think DVI isn't that good. It locks out auto-adjust, colour settings and the other settings (clock, phase..etc)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 23, 2009, 03:12:40 PM
On my Vista re-install, do I just need to do the Windows Update, or would it be better to download SP1 and run it after Vista is installed?  Then do whatever updates I need to do?

Only bad thing about re-installing is having to yank 2GB of RAM since it fairly always causes a crash if I try and install with 4GB.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 23, 2009, 04:16:35 PM
In general, its safe to apply an SP right out of the box, but then again, this is Vista, so...not sure. You could run WU, and if the first update to install is SP1, cancel out and run the update from your previously downloaded version. If not, and it wants some prior updates first, go that route.

I'm also trying to remember why your installation of Vista would balk at 4 gig. XP before SP2 would indeed barf, but that's another matter.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 23, 2009, 04:48:10 PM
Early (or early-ish) versions of Vista would get a BSOD and 0x00000000E or something error after the first restart when it was installing.  Google 'vista premium 4gb install problem' and it wil give you plenty of info if you're at all curious. 

There's a hotfix for it, and is also covered in the SP1 release.  Doesn't do me much good on install however so 2GB has to come out.  :oh_i_see:

Edit:  Re-installed Vista, everything is peachy.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 24, 2009, 12:37:09 AM
What's the best way to calibrate your monitor? Just got my dell monitor, but it's 50 on all settings and looks terrible.

Depends on your need. If you're wanting to do proper photo work on it then I'd strongly suggest a hardware calibrator like a Huey or a Spyder. Otherwise then you can just use simple tools like Adobe Gamma.

Good page on basic calibration here (http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/monitor_calibration.htm).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 24, 2009, 01:55:21 PM
What's the longest DVI or VGA monitor cable I can get? Ideally it's like 10-12'.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 24, 2009, 03:37:38 PM
5 meters is the dvi spec, though I've used 25' with no problems. For vga, I've used 12' cables with no problems.

Cables from http://www.monoprice.com (http://www.monoprice.com) specifically.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 24, 2009, 04:02:53 PM
Need to pick up a DVD-RW drive, any specific brand to look for or avoid?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 24, 2009, 04:10:29 PM
Lite-On is the largest maker so many of the "name" brand drives like HP and some of the Sony's are just Lite-On drives. I have a few (as Lite-On drives and rebadged drives) and they work fine though I haven't been trying to make copies of copy protected game discs these days so I'm not sure what people recommend for that application these days.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 24, 2009, 04:31:24 PM
5 meters is the dvi spec, though I've used 25' with no problems. For vga, I've used 12' cables with no problems.

Cables from http://www.monoprice.com (http://www.monoprice.com) specifically.
Ok great, thanks. Never been to that site either. Good source.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 24, 2009, 06:12:00 PM
Ok, new problem:

I have a Creative Sound Blaster X-fi card on the below machine. A few months ago I went from WinXP to Vista Ultimate. Prior to switching, I on occasion I'd use a headset for gaming. Been awhile though, and trying again today I've run into nothing but trouble.

1. Finally getting behind the box, I see I have two different sets of ports. Turns out my on-board sound supports surround sound, because I've got a number of ports for that. The X-fi card though only has four ports, and into one goes the headphone part. The other seems to pull double-duty between Optical In or Microphone. I assume it knows how to recognize the difference.
2. I tried launching the Creative Audio Console software; however, while it has three modes (Entertainment, Audio Creation, Gaming), it only allows me to launch into one of them (Audio Creation). If I launch either of the other modes, I get the message "The console for the current mode of your audio device cannot be launched. The console may not be installed, or may not be installed properly".
3. Even in just the Audio Creation mode, "The recording device cannot be used."
4. Thinking the drivers were out of date, I downloaded newer ones from Apr 2, 2008. When the actual installation begins though I get an error that the audio device is not recognized.
5. So I google'd up a separate set of drivers, found a link on some trade journal to a different (and more recent) version, downloaded and installed. That installation went fine. Had to uninstall the old drivers, install new ones, uninstall the audio console altogether, install a new one.
6. I quit the entire Audio Console just to see if that was causing a problem with the mic. Using Sound Recorder, I get nothing. Using the Speech Recorder wizard, I get nothing.

None of this solved the problem. The only mode I can use is Audio Creation and it still doesn't recognize the mic.

Specs:

Motherboard:  Asus P5N32-E SLI nForce® 680i SLI Chipset
Memory: Corsair XMS2 Xtreme 2x1024mb RAM
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6600 (2x 2.4GHz)
Power Supply: NZXT PRC-550 550W Power Supply (SLI-Ready)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
Sound: Creative Lab Sound Blaster X-Fi
Hard Drive: 250gb SATA-II 7200rpm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 24, 2009, 08:08:01 PM
I'm not familiar with the X-Fi cards, but that seems really strange to me. (Edit: having a control panel to activate the ports is the weird part, you should be able to do what you want without a SB specific control panel, just the Windows Sound applet).

Can't you use your onboard card instead? Just put your headset in SPEAKER and mic in MIC? Then, if you really want, pipe your "normal" sound through the SB card to your desktop speakers.

Which X-Fi is it?

Edit: I do see that they recommend OpenAL drivers for Vista (http://www.soundblaster.com/products/gaming/article.asp?articleID=62367&categoryID=13), so check those out if you haven't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 24, 2009, 08:08:49 PM
This is somewhat of a tech question, I think.

Anyway, turns out my computer problems are directly related to the combination of my video card and my motherboard. Neither of which can be returned now, so whose tech support should I be hounding over this? I'm leaning towards Asus (Motherboard) because I've always thought mobos were compatible with all video cards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 24, 2009, 08:19:58 PM
This is somewhat of a tech question, I think.

Anyway, turns out my computer problems are directly related to the combination of my video card and my motherboard. Neither of which can be returned now, so whose tech support should I be hounding over this? I'm leaning towards Asus (Motherboard) because I've always thought mobos were compatible with all video cards.
What's the problem? I would blame the video card first.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 24, 2009, 08:26:14 PM
Ok, new problem:

I have a Creative Sound Blaster X-fi card on the below machine. A few months ago I went from WinXP to Vista Ultimate. Prior to switching, I on occasion I'd use a headset for gaming. Been awhile though, and trying again today I've run into nothing but trouble.

1. Finally getting behind the box, I see I have two different sets of ports. Turns out my on-board sound supports surround sound, because I've got a number of ports for that. The X-fi card though only has four ports, and into one goes the headphone part. The other seems to pull double-duty between Optical In or Microphone. I assume it knows how to recognize the difference.

A couple of things:

The universal color for the mike jack is red. It should be so colored on the back of your x-fi card, next to the green for the headphones/speakers jack.

Secondly, does your case have a front panel with a mike/headphone connection? Open up the box and see where that cable is going. Its probably hooked up to your motherboard, so you should disconnect it from your motherboard and plug it into your sound card (somewhere on your sound card should be a bank of pins, 2 rows, that fit the 'plug' of your front panel audio inputs)

Once you have that set up, try the headphones again, but this time using the front panel. See if that fixes it. You may have a defective mike jack at the back of your sound card, or, alternately, having the front panel hooked into your mobo (if that was the case) could have been causing some internal confusing. Now that you have it hooked into your sound card proper, the confusion may disappear.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 24, 2009, 08:42:09 PM
Hmm, good questions.

So, I have a headphone and mic jack on the front (bottom right side) which I'll trace the wires for. I also have the X-fi card itself (four ports) and then another card above that which appears to be onboard because on the inside it's just a tiny nothing card with a white wire to the board.

I also get three options for sound in WoW: System Default, Regular Speakers (X-fi), SPDIF Out (X-fi). I have no idea what that third one is.

Finally, if the wires thing doesn't solve it I'll go with Viin's AL driver link.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 24, 2009, 09:10:07 PM
What's the problem? I would blame the video card first.
It's hard to say. No one really knows the exact problem, but from what I can gather there's a feature in the P5Q mobo that drops the voltage on the video card slowly causing it to kill itself.

A very detailed explanation from one person here (http://vip.asus.com/forum/view.aspx?id=20080713214821640&board_id=1&model=P5Q&page=1&SLanguage=en-us). Some people say turning off half the energy saving/performance features fixes it, but it's brutal having to reboot and wait for the system to lock up again. It took about an hour last time.

The problem being is that one guy reported his video card breaking from the voltage issue, so I don't know if mine is broken or if it's fine and I can keep trying all the bios option fixes.

Edit: Probably the video card. Problem is, even if I do RMA the card, they're only going to send me another one that won't work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2009, 10:06:09 PM
What's the longest DVI or VGA monitor cable I can get? Ideally it's like 10-12'.

I have used a 50' VGA for a projector, worked great but being a projector the resolution wasn't all that high (1024x768)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Grimwell on January 25, 2009, 12:55:09 AM
You have $200. You want to buy an ATX motherboard that is SLI friendly. The computer this board will support exists only to game. What do you buy?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 25, 2009, 01:02:08 AM
You have $200. You want to buy an ATX motherboard that is SLI friendly. The computer this board will support exists only to game. What do you buy?
Just to be clear do you want SLI (NVIDIA) or Crossfire (AMD/ATI) support?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 25, 2009, 01:06:55 AM
You have $200. You want to buy an ATX motherboard that is SLI friendly. The computer this board will support exists only to game. What do you buy?
Just to be clear do you want SLI (NVIDIA) or Crossfire (AMD/ATI) support?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 25, 2009, 01:07:58 AM
"SLI" is used by many people as a generic term for multiple cards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 25, 2009, 01:09:15 AM
I suppose maybe!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 25, 2009, 01:10:42 AM
Well you probably weren't old enough to remember the Voodoo SLI setup :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 25, 2009, 01:14:25 AM
Well you probably weren't old enough to remember the Voodoo SLI setup :awesome_for_real:

Pfffffffffffft.

I had SLI'd modems. It works for everything in pairs, rite?  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 25, 2009, 07:54:35 AM
Can't you use your onboard card instead? Just put your headset in SPEAKER and mic in MIC? Then, if you really want, pipe your "normal" sound through the SB card to your desktop speakers.

Which X-Fi is it?

Edit: I do see that they recommend OpenAL drivers for Vista (http://www.soundblaster.com/products/gaming/article.asp?articleID=62367&categoryID=13), so check those out if you haven't.

Did a bunch of poking around this morning. It appears the front jacks are not connected (looks like they never were, which I guess makes sense). The onboard card also doesn't work, so I'm guessing it was turned off at assembly (iBuyPower). That onboard card does have the standard red port that Engels talked about though.

It's just an X-Fi Audio card, no special pre-/suffixes like Fatal1ty nor Extremewhatver. I downloaded your OpenAL driver and installed it. I don't know if that's the exact thing that fixed the mic, but plugging the microphone wire into the optical/mic port works.

I still can't get the Audio Console to switch from Audio Creation to Entertainment nor Gaming modes, but honestly I don't care. My computer is in the living room and I'm using just-ok headphones so I can still talk with the wife when gaming anyway. I'll get fidelity someday when I build my game room in the basement :-)

Question: if my onboard sound has been disabled (presumably to prevent it conflicting with the X-Fi), how do I turn it back on? I poked around the BIOS but nothing jumped out at me.
The X-Fi optical/mic port pulls double duty. I downloaded you


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 25, 2009, 09:17:47 AM
Options like that should be in the BIOS, but it might be hidden in a sub-menu.  It's also possible the board is smart enough to automatically disable it because you have the X-Fi card installed.  On board sound doesn't tend to work if you have a card as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 25, 2009, 12:52:09 PM
Ok I'll look in the BIOS again. When I pulled the X-fi out, Vista didn't see a sound capability at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 25, 2009, 01:19:59 PM
Using Firefox 2.0.0.20

For some reason, a while ago my download manager stopped working. I can open it, but anything I download is done "in the background."

Also, I can't save pictures through the browser. As in, when I right-click and go through the dialog of picking a place and naming and saving the file, it does not work. I can open up an old version of IE that I never use and save just fine.

virus/spyware scans turn up nothing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 25, 2009, 01:23:10 PM
Have you considered going to Firefox 3? 2.0.0.20 is pretty old :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 25, 2009, 02:14:06 PM
Yeah, but there was talk awhile ago that Ff 3 sucks ass. Has this changed - is the browser acceptable and such now?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 25, 2009, 04:06:11 PM
Just test it out. If it 'sucks ass' (although I can't see how a mozilla browser can illicit such scathing criticism. Safari, sure, but Mozilla?), uninstall it and reinstall 2, which you can probably find somewhere on the FF site, if nto elsewhere (Twocows prolly still hosts a copy).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 25, 2009, 04:42:43 PM
Yeah, but there was talk awhile ago that Ff 3 sucks ass. Has this changed - is the browser acceptable and such now?
Who said FF3 sucks ass? The memory management in FF3 is much better than that bloated POS FF2. Also FF2 is no longer supported (December 2008 was the last month) so if any security issues come up on FF2 you are on your own.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 25, 2009, 06:27:10 PM
People here were complaining about it when it first hit, so I stayed away. I guess I'll give it a shot myself.

EDIT: Not surprisingly, upgrading to the newest version fixed the problem.

One annoyance though - every time I download something, it's immediately scanned....any way to turn this off, or at least set exceptions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Grimwell on January 26, 2009, 07:10:04 AM
You have $200. You want to buy an ATX motherboard that is SLI friendly. The computer this board will support exists only to game. What do you buy?
Just to be clear do you want SLI (NVIDIA) or Crossfire (AMD/ATI) support?

Sorry for the delayed response.

I want SLI = nVidia. It's a personal thing, but I prefer their cards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Grimwell on January 26, 2009, 07:25:56 AM
I'm thinking this would be good (http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3523225&csid=ITD&body=MAIN#detailspecs). Anyone know of a reason I should not buy it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 26, 2009, 08:50:50 AM
One annoyance though - every time I download something, it's immediately scanned....any way to turn this off, or at least set exceptions?

What is doing the scanning?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 26, 2009, 08:59:25 AM
I'm thinking this would be good (http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3523225&csid=ITD&body=MAIN#detailspecs). Anyone know of a reason I should not buy it?
I wasn't happy with the mcp/mosfet/etc cooler on that board, it's one big, long set of heatsinks/pipes, and if you install the (needed) fan, it defaults to blowing the heat from the mcp directly on the back of the primary video card. And evga's response to me was to suggest I lap the bottom of the heatsink system, and bend it until it fit better, while cautioning that it may void the warranty. Would have been workable, but I was annoyed enough to go for an DFI x38 board instead.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Grimwell on January 26, 2009, 09:50:58 AM
You wouldn't happen to have a link to the DFI x38  board you went with would you?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 26, 2009, 01:38:33 PM
I also get three options for sound in WoW: System Default, Regular Speakers (X-fi), SPDIF Out (X-fi). I have no idea what that third one is.
Probably for someone like me running to a home theater, it's a digital out.

Unfortunately, on the X-Fi, you can't get surround sound on the spdif out, you've got to pony up for their breakout box (http://us.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=720&subcategory=736&product=14191).

Speaking of the X-Fi and Vista, whatever became of the issue of hardware sound acceleration in Vista?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 26, 2009, 02:07:17 PM
You wouldn't happen to have a link to the DFI x38  board you went with would you?

I went with the LP LT x38-T2R, there's an x48 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813136046) equivalent that wasn't out when I upgraded. However, if you really need sli you'll need to go with a 780i/790i for core2 or x58 for CoreI7. None of the 780i boards I've looked at seemed laid out well, and the 790i would be over the $200 mark. But if you've already got chip/memory/etc that will point you toward a few specific boards.

I was quite happy with my evga 680i and an evga 680iLT, sli worked fine, no issues. Bit long in the tooth these days though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 26, 2009, 03:46:10 PM
I also get three options for sound in WoW: System Default, Regular Speakers (X-fi), SPDIF Out (X-fi). I have no idea what that third one is.
Probably for someone like me running to a home theater, it's a digital out.

Unfortunately, on the X-Fi, you can't get surround sound on the spdif out, you've got to pony up for their breakout box (http://us.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=720&subcategory=736&product=14191).

What does it allow you to do? Control your components from the computer?

And feh, my freakin' on board sound supports 5.1 Surround (not uber, but it's there if I ever start caring again) and the X-Fi doesn't?!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 26, 2009, 03:52:16 PM
I also get three options for sound in WoW: System Default, Regular Speakers (X-fi), SPDIF Out (X-fi). I have no idea what that third one is.
Probably for someone like me running to a home theater, it's a digital out.

Unfortunately, on the X-Fi, you can't get surround sound on the spdif out, you've got to pony up for their breakout box (http://us.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=720&subcategory=736&product=14191).

What does it allow you to do? Control your components from the computer?

And feh, my freakin' on board sound supports 5.1 Surround (not uber, but it's there if I ever start caring again) and the X-Fi doesn't?!
X-Fi supports 7.1 analog surround sound out of the output jacks on the card. Sky is talking about digital surround output.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 26, 2009, 03:53:38 PM
I think the whole point of SPDIF is so that you get a clean unprocessed digital signal.  Not something that's already been dorked around with so that you can use a really good piece of equipment on it.  I think the assumption is that the DSP in your multi-thousand dollar audio reciever is a bit better than the 1 dollar part used for the board build in.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 26, 2009, 04:06:07 PM
I think the whole point of SPDIF is so that you get a clean unprocessed digital signal.  Not something that's already been dorked around with so that you can use a really good piece of equipment on it.  I think the assumption is that the DSP in your multi-thousand dollar audio reciever is a bit better than the 1 dollar part used for the board build in.
Yes you would think.

In theory I think it's because many if not most people that are hooking up a surround sound system to their PCs are doing it directly via the computer rather than through a receiver/integrated amplifier first (i.e. their computer is not a dedicated HTPC system). Given the low end nature of the typical PC-centric surround speaker system I don't think they could even tell the difference between analog and digital outputs.

In reality it's just a way for Creative to make a little extra money since they have such a dominate market share they don't have to care if their competitors offer that feature without making people pay extra.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 26, 2009, 04:11:04 PM
What does it allow you to do? Control your components from the computer?

And feh, my freakin' on board sound supports 5.1 Surround (not uber, but it's there if I ever start caring again) and the X-Fi doesn't?!
X-Fi supports 7.1 analog surround sound out of the output jacks on the card. Sky is talking about digital surround output.

Oh, ok, that makes more sense.

And I agree with you that there's probably a lot more people hooking up those 5-in-1 Best Buy box deals of speakers/subwoofer directly to their computer than their Harmon Kardon pre-amp across the room  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 26, 2009, 04:11:40 PM
Speaking of the X-Fi and Vista, whatever became of the issue of hardware sound acceleration in Vista?
http://connect.creativelabs.com/openal/default.aspx


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 26, 2009, 04:31:53 PM
You wouldn't happen to have a link to the DFI x38  board you went with would you?
The DFI LanParty X38 boards use the Intel X38 chipset which means they have CrossFire not SLI support. The DFI LanParty site is here:

http://www.dfi.com.tw/portal/CM/cmproduct

but it doesn't look like they sell any Intel CPU/NVIDIA chipset motherboards in that line anymore.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 26, 2009, 05:05:32 PM
Good motherboard to get since the P5Q has issues with EVGA cards? Preferably without any silly "green" power saving options.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 26, 2009, 05:16:50 PM
One annoyance though - every time I download something, it's immediately scanned....any way to turn this off, or at least set exceptions?

What is doing the scanning?

Firefox itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 26, 2009, 05:41:06 PM
One annoyance though - every time I download something, it's immediately scanned....any way to turn this off, or at least set exceptions?

What is doing the scanning?

Firefox itself.

I didn't know it could do that... what is it looking for?  Virii?  Maybe it is an add-on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 26, 2009, 07:28:12 PM
Are you sure it's not your virus scanner working through Firefox?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on January 26, 2009, 07:45:56 PM
Straz is talking about a default feature of Firefox. It automatically does some quick scan of everything you download when it finishes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 26, 2009, 10:47:13 PM
Straz is talking about a default feature of Firefox. It automatically does some quick scan of everything you download when it finishes.
No Firefox isn't doing the scanning, it's integrating with any virus scanner you have installed:

http://blog.kaizeku.com/ua/firefox/how-to-disabled-firefox-3-dowload-manager-automated-anti-virus-scan/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 27, 2009, 07:38:10 AM
What does it allow you to do? Control your components from the computer?
Nothing. It just sits there. But it's the only way to get digital surround sound to my receiver.

I got spoiled with the old Soundstorm chip, that was the best onboard sound evar. DD5.1 hardware on a mobo? Hell yeah. When that died, I tried running an Auzentech X-Plosion, which was based on the Soundstorm setup. The drivers were god-fucking-awful, Oblivion was unplayable due to a (still) unresolved sound bug that cropped up in a few other games. I finally bit the bullet and went for the X-Fi, then had to scramble to find the way to connect it digitally to my setup.

Pain in the butt and cost me $$ (the linked box was more like $100 a couple years ago, plus the X-Fi), but now I have great sound, so it's worth it in the long run.

Murgos brings up the main problem, though I haven't really seen any tangible effects: It's D/A to A/D rather than a straight digital signal. Fucking Creative.

Trippy, thanks for that link. Very informative! (and thanks for not letmegooglethatforyou'ing me)

Quote
There is always one Listener object (per audio context), which represents the position where the sources are heard -- rendering is done from the perspective of the Listener.
That seems like a silly limitation. What it you wanted to have a speaker that is playing real-time sound from another area. You'd need a Listener for the main actor and a Listener for the microphone feeding the speaker.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 27, 2009, 07:14:22 PM
HomePlug.  Somehow I managed to forget all about this technology but it could solve my LAN problem.  Has anyone had any experience with this?  Gotchas?

Answering my own question for the benefit of everyone.  It's really cool, assuming your outlets are actually connected.  Summary is that my 360 and PS3 are now wired, and my DirecTV receiver will be as well once I put in the IP config.  I got the ZyXEL PLA-470 (four port brick) from newegg.com but I had to get the PLA-401 (one port wall wart) from somewhere less awesome since newegg only has the 470 for some reason.  Unfortunately my remote equipment just disconnected and I'm not sure what's up.  I can see both MACs from the local side (router/DSL/rig side upstairs) but the PS3 isn't getting connected after some great downloading.  I will try a few things, such as going back to DHCP, before I get angry and punch a cat.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 29, 2009, 05:26:13 AM
Can anyone give me some simple advice on connecting a TV, PS3 and surround sound system?

I've got a Sony Bravia (http://www.sony.co.uk/product/t32-w-series/kdl-40w4500) TV, a PS3 and a Sony Home Theatre (http://www.sony.co.uk/product/hcs-cinema-surround-kit/ht-ss1300) all-in-one thingy and there's so many connection options that I'm confused.

I presume that just an optical cable from PS3 to the HTSS will do for that bit of it, or would HDMI be better? And for the TV do I want an HDMI for audio output from the HTSS to the TV and an optical cable for TV output to the HTSS (i.e. for broadcast channel viewing)?

Does that sound reasonable or would there be a better way?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 29, 2009, 06:40:36 AM
Can anyone give me some simple advice on connecting a TV, PS3 and surround sound system?

I've got a Sony Bravia (http://www.sony.co.uk/product/t32-w-series/kdl-40w4500) TV, a PS3 and a Sony Home Theatre (http://www.sony.co.uk/product/hcs-cinema-surround-kit/ht-ss1300) all-in-one thingy and there's so many connection options that I'm confused.

I presume that just an optical cable from PS3 to the HTSS will do for that bit of it, or would HDMI be better? And for the TV do I want an HDMI for audio output from the HTSS to the TV and an optical cable for TV output to the HTSS (i.e. for broadcast channel viewing)?

Does that sound reasonable or would there be a better way?

HDMI from everything to the HTSS.  HDMI out from HTSS to TV.  Done.

Optical cable, despite being called optical (it means fiber optic) is often only a digital audio transport.

edit: Let me rephrase before Trippy corrects me.  Optical out on Home Theater/Audio equipment is generally only used to transport digital audio and not digital video (although it could, I guess they don't due to DRM issues).  HDMI carries both digital video and digital audio.

edit2: wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOSLINK


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 29, 2009, 06:56:48 AM
Can anyone give me some simple advice on connecting a TV, PS3 and surround sound system?

I've got a Sony Bravia (http://www.sony.co.uk/product/t32-w-series/kdl-40w4500) TV, a PS3 and a Sony Home Theatre (http://www.sony.co.uk/product/hcs-cinema-surround-kit/ht-ss1300) all-in-one thingy and there's so many connection options that I'm confused.

I presume that just an optical cable from PS3 to the HTSS will do for that bit of it, or would HDMI be better? And for the TV do I want an HDMI for audio output from the HTSS to the TV and an optical cable for TV output to the HTSS (i.e. for broadcast channel viewing)?

Does that sound reasonable or would there be a better way?

HDMI carries video and sound, and makes everything easier. toslink is just for sound.
hdmi from the ps3 to the Home Theatre, hdmi from the Home Theatre to the tv. If your television signal is from an antenna using the tv's internal tuner, then optical out (sound only of course, the pics already on the tv!) from the tv to the htss. If you're using a cable/sky/plus/whatever box for tv signal, hdmi from that to the htss. That's pretty much how I have my system set up. hdmi for everything except ota sound, which goes from the tv to receiver, so I can watch the occasional program over the good speakers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 29, 2009, 07:13:50 AM
Awesome thankyou guys. So all I need to get is one more HDMI cable and I'm good to go. Right.... off to Argos then  :why_so_serious:

 :heart:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 29, 2009, 07:16:10 AM
Awesome thankyou guys. So all I need to get is one more HDMI cable and I'm good to go. Right.... off to Argos then  :why_so_serious:

 :heart:

Just because your back is better doesn't mean you have to travel to Greece just to get an HDMI cable. If you do, say hi to the Darkfall guys for me!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on February 01, 2009, 05:39:41 PM
Ok, so between these video cards, which one would be the best bang for my buck:

Sapphire ATI RADEON HD 4850 (http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=018942&cid=999.243.272)

Asus EAH4850 (http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=018957&cid=999.243.272)

XFX GeForce 9800GT (http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=019957&cid=999.243.390)

Asus EN9800GT HYBRIDPOWER (http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=019656&cid=999.243.390)

Once again, EVGA is not an option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 01, 2009, 05:53:50 PM
The 4850 is the faster GPU (the 4850 is actually a match for the 9800 GTX/GTX+). Only you can decide if that's worth the extra $20.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on February 01, 2009, 08:16:47 PM
Eh, what's $20. Anything wrong with Sapphire that you know of? Reviews check out, but I've never really seen a terrible review.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 01, 2009, 08:19:15 PM
Sapphire used to make ATI's "reference" boards. Dunno if that's still true post AMD acquisition.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jobu on February 03, 2009, 11:11:20 AM
Anyone know a tool to test video card RAM the same way I would test system RAM with Memtest?

I suspect my video card is on the fritz. I re-installed XP over Vista64 (thinking it was a driver issue) but I still get the same weird behavior. I don't have a spare video card to throw into the mix, so I need to find a way to test it out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 03, 2009, 11:38:29 AM
Eh, what's $20. Anything wrong with Sapphire that you know of? Reviews check out, but I've never really seen a terrible review.
When I had an ATI board, it was Sapphire. Partly for the reason Trippy mentioned, partly because it was a great board. This was a while ago, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 04, 2009, 05:56:31 PM
Trying to add two more 1gb sticks to my computer. Mobo is Asus P5N32-E C2D E6600. I bought it with 2gbs already installed (two sticks of 1gb DDR1). So I purchase two more sticks from Newegg, the same type (Corsair XMS2) and install them.

The first time I did that was a week ago. Computer would crash right before the Vista login screen. One stick would work (for 3gbs) but not the second (for 4gbs). Figuring a bad RAM stick, I return the bad one. Then I get told I needed to return both, so do that.

Today I get the new set and install. This time the computer won't even get the Asus screen. And I cannot enter the BIOS setup menu. Just hangs, no matter how long I leave it. So I pull out one of the sticks and it works fine, albeit with 3gbs. Some guesses:

1) Is it possible I get ANOTHER bad RAM stick? This would be extreme for me. I have never ever received bad RAM, in 20 years of mucking with the innards of computers.

2) Could I have a bad RAM slot? That would suck but I'd live with it, probably return this RAM and buy two 2gb sticks. If I understand the manual correctly, since this is dual channel, whatever I put in the left two slots I need to match in the right two. So if one slot on the left is out, to get 4gbs, I'd need to remove all RAM and just put in to two 2gb sticks. Question here: can I go to 6gb down the road by adding one more 2gb even if I leave the last (broken) slot empty?

3) Could I be missing something in the BIOS? There's an option on the Extreme Tweaker tab at the bottom called "Memory Config" or something like that, but it is greyed out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 04, 2009, 06:12:55 PM
Sounds like you need this (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=91672c7c-614b-404c-850c-377541e93c18&displaylang=en) update from Microsoft.  Take out the additional RAM, download the update and install.  If it prompts you to restart, go ahead and do so.  After getting back to desktop, shut it down, install the RAM.  Then power back up.  Bing badaboom badda bing.

Also, there's some setting called Extended Memory (I think) in the ASUS bios that you need to enable otherwise it won't recognize the additional 2GB.  At least there is on my ASUS P5N-D 750i SLI.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 04, 2009, 06:34:09 PM
Hmm. That seems to only apply to 64bit Vista. I should have mentioned I only have Vista 32.

I think it was the Extended Memory thing in my BIOS that was grayed out. I can't remember the last time I updated the BIOS. Maybe that alone should inspire me to?  :wink:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 04, 2009, 07:11:44 PM
I don't think Vista 32 supports more than 3GB of RAM.  Might be your problem?  A quick google search revealed quite a few people that seem to have had the same problem.  Anyway, according to this (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929777/en-us) page, that same KB929777 update works for both 32 bit and 64 bit versions.

Bios updating?  Eh, I don't update unless I start having problems but that's just me.  Same for drivers.

Then again, it might be worth removing what your old RAM that you know is good, and trying the new 2GB you're not quite sure about.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 04, 2009, 08:01:46 PM
I had 4GB of RAM in my 32bit Vista install no problems .. are they the same speed/type as your originals? (DDR2 800s maybe?) Do both new sticks by themselves work?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 05, 2009, 12:28:32 PM
Yes on them being the same as the original. I'm going to try and swap them tonight. I didn't realize KB929777 would work for Vista32. That'll be step two.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 05, 2009, 12:38:02 PM
I would say 'step up to Vista 64', but W7 is around the proverbial corner.  So, meh. 

But yeah, get that update and you should be good to go (assuming your RAM is, in fact, good).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 05, 2009, 03:54:45 PM
Thanks, trying that in a bit.

Separate question: Charter is going to cap my tier of cable modem speeds to 100g a month. What program can I get to get a sense for how much bandwidth I use?  I think in way far south of 100gbs, but I want to be sure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 05, 2009, 05:11:17 PM
There's a widget gidget gadget thing for the Vista sidebar that keeps up with it I believe.  I know Schild uses something that tells him how much bandwidth he consumes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 06, 2009, 02:52:23 AM
If they're capping you don't they have a webpage you can visit to check?

My ISP has one but it's broken about 50% of the time and when it's broken they don't enforce the caps  :drill:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 06, 2009, 10:46:26 AM
Web browsers on linux.  Which one is the easiest to get up and running and will display at least 90% of what I surf to?  Alternatively, maybe I want a codex pack for Firefox 3 so video.google.com doesn't make it go catatonic?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 06, 2009, 12:11:19 PM
I'm using RHEL and ubuntu that come default with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.6 and after installing flash, it runs just fine. Can you define catatonia? This is on an old P4 with 512 ram and a Radeon X600.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 06, 2009, 12:33:35 PM
Catatonia = hangs up, at least when I'm trying to use video.google.com, requiring me to either wait some indeterminate period or terminate the process.  It occasionally works but is choppy, perhaps due to CPU?  It's a AMD XP 3000+. There were three choices for swf player, seems I chose poorly?  If it matters, this is Firefox 3 on Ubuntu 8.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 06, 2009, 01:00:15 PM
I think I picked the, what, 3rd option down for Debian linux (Ubuntu)? But I think your problem may be slightly different. Sometimes Ubuntu doesn't really install the 'real' device drivers for your vid card and fudges it. Then flash will run like crap. Can you see if its running the right drivers? ATI cards, for example, have 'restricted' drivers that are not installed by default by Ubuntu and need to be specially 'authorised' by you to download and install.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 06, 2009, 01:05:53 PM
I installed the "restricted" drivers for the vid card.  Those might still be the problem, though.  Stupid linux.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 06, 2009, 01:24:44 PM
Yeeeah, I've had touch and go luck with ATI. Its so odd how ATI drags its feet about Linux.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 06, 2009, 03:43:51 PM
So, today one of the department heads decided it was time to clean out a back storage area filled with soil samples and ancient equipment. We discovered some ancient IBM PCs, so I am now typing from an ancient Model M IBM keyboard! Schild was totally right that this thing is the BOMB to type on.

Here's a few pics:





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 06, 2009, 04:26:19 PM
I don't think Vista 32 supports more than 3GB of RAM.  Might be your problem?  A quick google search revealed quite a few people that seem to have had the same problem.  Anyway, according to this (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929777/en-us) page, that same KB929777 update works for both 32 bit and 64 bit versions.

Tried this finally. Didn't work. Said I didn't have the right configuration for it. And this was after I went to the page that said this patch was for "Windows Vista" generic. I also moved the RAM around. It's not the RAM slots (thankfully). I think the schmucks sent back to me what I just returned to them. I really can't calculate the probability that the second version of the same SKU also had one busted RAM stick. I'm trying to find a subtle way to mark these so when I return them I can see if they do it again. Wish my local Circuit Cities still had RAM left.

@apocrypha: Good point. I can't find it at Charter.net, so will probably just call once I receive the official notice about this policy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on February 06, 2009, 04:29:17 PM
So, today one of the department heads decided it was time to clean out a back storage area filled with soil samples and ancient equipment. We discovered some ancient IBM PCs, so I am now typing from an ancient Model M IBM keyboard! Schild was totally right that this thing is the BOMB to type on.

You found SOME IBM PCs?

Get me another one plz.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 06, 2009, 08:03:17 PM
Web browsers on linux.  Which one is the easiest to get up and running and will display at least 90% of what I surf to?  Alternatively, maybe I want a codex pack for Firefox 3 so video.google.com doesn't make it go catatonic?
Are you using a 64-bit version of Ubuntu?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ragnoros on February 07, 2009, 07:39:03 AM
I want to play DoW II. But my old X850 only supports up to Pixel Shader 2.0b and DoW requires 3.0 or higher.

I was more than happy with my X850 for playing Fallout 3. ( the newest, most system testing game I own ) And if it were not for the fact that DoW won't even run under PS 2.0 I would not upgrade.

But anyway, tl;dr: What's the best bang-for-your-buck video card around the $80-$120 range?
I have been using ATI for my last two cards but I an not adverse to Nvidia. I'll do some of my own reaserch, but you guys are always helpful snarky so figured I would ask here.

Fake Edit: Do we still do strikethrough? I heard green was out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 07, 2009, 07:47:11 AM
Cheap vid card?  You could always buy one or both of my 8800GTS G92's if I decide to sell them  Lifetime transferable warranty, never overclocked, aprox 1 year old, like new!! :grin:

Which brings me to...

Thinking about buying one of those snazzy GTX295's.  I'm currently running the aforementioned GTS's in SLI (x16 at each slot) at 1920x1200 resolution.  Am I going to see a measureable increase in performance?  Or will I see a bottleneck at my proc (oc'd q6600 at 3.2ghz) or my RAM (4GB 4-4-4-12 Ballistix) that will limit those gains?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 07, 2009, 09:01:21 AM
I want to play DoW II. But my old X850 only supports up to Pixel Shader 2.0b and DoW requires 3.0 or higher.

I was more than happy with my X850 for playing Fallout 3. ( the newest, most system testing game I own ) And if it were not for the fact that DoW won't even run under PS 2.0 I would not upgrade.

But anyway, tl;dr: What's the best bang-for-your-buck video card around the $80-$120 range?
I have been using ATI for my last two cards but I an not adverse to Nvidia. I'll do some of my own reaserch, but you guys are always helpful snarky so figured I would ask here.

Fake Edit: Do we still do strikethrough? I heard green was out.
If you want to stick with ATI then if you can find one on sale or with a rebate for ~$120 get a 4850 otherwise get the 4830.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 07, 2009, 10:34:55 AM
So, today one of the department heads decided it was time to clean out a back storage area filled with soil samples and ancient equipment. We discovered some ancient IBM PCs, so I am now typing from an ancient Model M IBM keyboard! Schild was totally right that this thing is the BOMB to type on.

You found SOME IBM PCs?

Get me another one plz.

Ah, there were only 2 keyboards, and one of them has the old keyboard connection, not the ps2 kind. I'm not even sure this second one works.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 07, 2009, 01:34:57 PM
So, today one of the department heads decided it was time to clean out a back storage area filled with soil samples and ancient equipment. We discovered some ancient IBM PCs, so I am now typing from an ancient Model M IBM keyboard! Schild was totally right that this thing is the BOMB to type on.

You found SOME IBM PCs?

Get me another one plz.

Ah, there were only 2 keyboards, and one of them has the old keyboard connection, not the ps2 kind. I'm not even sure this second one works.

5 pin din to ps2 converter (http://www.restockit.com/Belkin-Pro-Series-Keyboard-Converter-Cable-Keyboard-Adapter-6-Pin-PS-2-M-5-Pin-DIN-F-6-In-(664044).html?source=froogle&Bvar5=100F1&Bvar6=100F1&Bvar7=100F1)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 07, 2009, 05:51:40 PM
Yep, in fact, in the detritus of the college's basements there is probably a drawer full of them. Unfortunately, my duties prevent me from a full archeological expedition.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 08, 2009, 10:20:27 AM
Thanks, trying that in a bit.

Separate question: Charter is going to cap my tier of cable modem speeds to 100g a month. What program can I get to get a sense for how much bandwidth I use?  I think in way far south of 100gbs, but I want to be sure.

Bitmeter (http://www.download.com/BitMeter/3000-2381_4-10398686.html)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Thrawn on February 09, 2009, 11:58:50 AM
So my computer has just been having more and more problems lately and it's acting up again now and I'm having a tough time pinpointing whats causing the issues.  As most of it is pushing 3 years old I'm way overdue for an overhaul.  But $$ is a bit tight.

Do you think I can do a decent upgrade for <$500?  Or at least something close to that without buying no-name crap parts.  The case, monitor, hard drives, dvd drives should all be good still.  Currently I'm running -

Windows XP
GeForce 7600
4gb DDR SDRAM DDR 400 (PC 3200) (Yes, I know)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+

I'm assuming I'll need/want new MB, CPU, PSU, Memory and Video Card.  Whats the way to go right now, Intel or AMD?

I'm not looking for someone to spoon feed me an exact setup (unless they feel generous) but I haven't been keeping up real well on my hardware lately so an idea of what direction to look at would be great.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 09, 2009, 12:30:50 PM
Web browsers on linux.  Which one is the easiest to get up and running and will display at least 90% of what I surf to?  Alternatively, maybe I want a codex pack for Firefox 3 so video.google.com doesn't make it go catatonic?
Are you using a 64-bit version of Ubuntu?

Pretty sure I am not.  I think the AMD XP 3000+ is 32-bit?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 09, 2009, 12:33:26 PM
I just did this, new p5q mobo, core 2 duo, 4 gig PC8500, Radeon 4850  came in at $480ish after shipping and tax, so if your current PSU can handle it you might be okay.

Fair warning I did end up dumping another $150 on a case and cpu fan 2 weeks later due to some heat issues (thinking my 12 year old single fan case couldn't keep up with the ATI card).

here is sort of what i went with:
mobo $97 (seems like it was cheaper when i bought it) (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131347)
E8400 CPU $165 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115037)
4 gig ram $52 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820104097)
ATI 4850 (asus branded) $165 (was $150 w/o rebates when I bought mine) (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121272)

I left out the mail in rebates for the above but seems like there were about $50 worth all told.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 09, 2009, 08:02:10 PM
Web browsers on linux.  Which one is the easiest to get up and running and will display at least 90% of what I surf to?  Alternatively, maybe I want a codex pack for Firefox 3 so video.google.com doesn't make it go catatonic?
Are you using a 64-bit version of Ubuntu?
Pretty sure I am not.  I think the AMD XP 3000+ is 32-bit?
Yeah the Athlon XP is 32-bit only. Shouldn't be so hard, then, to get Flash working.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 09, 2009, 09:59:09 PM
I think that its not so much flash as that the ATI drivers for Ubuntu blow goats. A while back I managed, finally, to get Ubuntu's graphic drivers for ATI to work as expected, but I had to do some pretty in depth research to find the 'right ones'. This was about two years ago, I must say, so I can't be certain that the solution would be the same. However, that it still doesn't work right doesn't surprise me much.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 10, 2009, 09:27:09 AM
Ok.  Bought the Zalman CNPS9700 LED fan/heatsink.

Probably should have asked this before I bought it, but will it be able to utilize the mobo's (ASUS P5N-D 750i SLI) automatic fan control or do I have to use the external fan speed control?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 10, 2009, 10:28:07 AM
Ok.  Bought the Zalman CNPS9700 LED fan/heatsink.

Probably should have asked this before I bought it, but will it be able to utilize the mobo's (ASUS P5N-D 750i SLI) automatic fan control or do I have to use the external fan speed control?
The fan in the 9700 supports PWM control so it'll work with your motherboard fan controller.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 10, 2009, 11:44:57 AM
Thanks, man.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 11, 2009, 02:47:28 PM
Intardnet question...

I've got Comcast as my service provider, and my plan is the 8MB down / 2MB up.  I rarely break 1MB down, usually averages about 800kb/s.  Occasionally on the start of the initial download I'll hit 2MB down, but it lasts about 2 seconds.  Is there *any* reason I should use the 8MB over the 3MB service?  Is this a problem with Comcast throttling their own download speeds, or is it a problem with my neighborhood size (about 50 houses - unknown how many have broadband, but guessing all of them).  It doesn't matter what time of day, it just seems that my DL speeds are capped awfully low for the service I have.  It seems about the same speed as my old 3MB down service.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on February 11, 2009, 03:18:15 PM
Speedtest (http://www.speedtest.net/) will give you an idea of what you're getting. Comcast does different stuff in different places, where I am they're still borking torrents, but I get ~20M down 3M up most times (less between 5pm and 7pm) on a 12M/1.5M plan


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 11, 2009, 06:31:51 PM
I have a pretty basic plan, and the speedtest swears I should get 10m down. I don't think I've ever seen anything close to that, but I am willing to bet a big part of that is on the other end of my download.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on February 12, 2009, 06:50:43 AM
Make sure that you are comparing apples to apples.

Sometimes your DL speed will be reported in bytes and sometimes in bits and it can be confusing to see which you are getting.

Also, as someone who actually works with the transmission of bits on a wire there is even more ambiguity there than you are aware of because it usually takes ~10 bits to encode 8 bits of information for transmission and there is other overhead as well (preamble, header, crc and other info you never see, etc...).

So, if you have a connection that is physically capable of moving 10 Mbps you cant really expect it to move a 10 Mb file in 1 second.  So what does a 10 Mbps dl speed really mean?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 12, 2009, 07:19:08 AM
So what does a 10 Mbps dl speed really mean?

Hell if I know.  Was hoping you could tell me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 12, 2009, 08:33:36 AM
10Mbps just means "this is faster than 5Mbps".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 12, 2009, 08:49:26 AM
Sad, but true.

Rarely will you ever get the full capacity of your bandwidth due to intervening networks and overhead.  Mostly it means your chances of having a decent download speed are better.  With luck it might also mean better equipment is used so you tend to have a lower latency.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nightshade on February 16, 2009, 10:43:56 AM
I can't seem to find any backgrounds that are up to what I would deem to be decent for my MSN messenger wallpaper. Would anyone have links to a site?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 16, 2009, 11:44:07 AM
So I like having a quasi-media server PC, but we don't use it nearly enough to justify having it on all the time. What's the best solution:

1) Have it go into Standby mode. Can I wake this up remotely? How? Be accessing a shortcut to the server volume or through my RealVNC connection?
2) Find a method to remote-boot it. Is this software based or hardware?

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on February 16, 2009, 12:52:43 PM
Wake on LAN might work, but I'm not 100% sure how that works. If it works in that any device that tries to access the computer over the LAN "wakes" it up, then it should work for you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 16, 2009, 07:32:37 PM
What's a good video card diagnostic program?  Nvidia 8800 GT.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 16, 2009, 09:06:46 PM
I've never heard of one, to be honest. What is the symptom?

Edit: You could download and install nTune (http://www.nvidia.com/object/ntune_5.05.54.00.html) or Riva Tuner  (http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?page=rivatuner) to check the temperature on the GPU, but I don't think they do much more in terms of troubleshooting. NTune has a 'stability test' that you can run as well, but I'm not sure it'll tell you what the problem is if it is a GPU problem. Riva Tuner also says it has a diagnotic ability, but I am not familiar with the program.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 16, 2009, 09:56:17 PM
Usually graphics corruption followed shortly thereafter by a crash.  Typical "dammit my vid card is acting up" stuff, but I'd like a little more to go on than educated guesses and instinct.

Temp is my first concern.  I'll see what nTune tells me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on February 17, 2009, 05:23:54 AM
I know there are programs that check VRAM much in the way MemTest checks normal RAM. Can't quite recall any programs, Sorry Lanty!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 17, 2009, 07:20:20 AM
I was just thinking that I have that same vid card, the 8000 GT, and I had to switch out the cooling fan for an after-market one. The one I got was this Zalman (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835118001). It dropped my GPU temp very significantly.

The issue was that the factory cooler had a solid plate of metal as the heating conductor for both the GPU and the ram chips, and just a small piddly fan for all of it. The temps were high, around 70C at idle, hitting 90C at the drop of a hat. With the Zalman, the temp dropped to ~50C at idle, top temp of 75C, well within safety thresholds.

Now GPU heatsink installation is kinda scary to perform, but I found that this particular model was not difficult. The one plus/minus with this particular heatsink is that the fan speed is manually regulated. This is great in terms of noise control, but you sorta have to remember to crank it up during strenuous game play. Its not that loud, but if sound is a factor its something to consider.

Of course, it may be too late for your card if you're already seeing artifacts, but if you don't wanna plonk down a few hundred for a new card, this might be a troubleshooting option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 17, 2009, 09:41:20 AM
My card has heatpipes, a giant heat sink, plus two fans which are running fine.  I do need to look it over more carefully, but I'm more worried about the failed nVidia board problems catching up with it than it needing a new cooling solution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on February 17, 2009, 10:37:36 AM
My card has heatpipes, a giant heat sink, plus two fans which are running fine.  I do need to look it over more carefully, but I'm more worried about the failed nVidia board problems catching up with it than it needing a new cooling solution.

I had a similar problem once and it turned out that the fans were clogged with dust.  You can't tell while they are running but if you look at them when they are off it's pretty apparent.

I just cleaned 'em out with a cotton swab and the card was fine after that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 17, 2009, 01:24:21 PM
The fans are the secondary cooling, so I'm not to concerned with how gunked up they are.

Here is my card. (http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1284/3/ecs_geforce_8800gt_accelero_s1_512mb/index.html)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 17, 2009, 02:05:14 PM
Ya, that heatsink is actually considered one of the best on the market for the 8800 GT. That said, if you have old and crusty thermal paste, not even the best heatsink in the world is gonna cool the GPU properly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 17, 2009, 08:35:17 PM
nTune showed the fan set to cool at 33% speed when running a 3D application and being 46°C with basic windows tasks.  Seems a little high for essentially idle.  Cranking it up to max fan speed for 3D kept it at 54°C while playing and I didn't have any graphics glitches at all.

Given all that I'm guessing it is a heat issue and I'll just need to make sure everything is clean and maybe reapply some thermal paste.  Thanks for the help.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 17, 2009, 08:45:22 PM
nTune showed the fan set to cool at 33% speed when running a 3D application and being 46°C with basic windows tasks.  Seems a little high for essentially idle.  Cranking it up to max fan speed for 3D kept it at 54°C while playing and I didn't have any graphics glitches at all.

Given all that I'm guessing it is a heat issue and I'll just need to make sure everything is clean and maybe reapply some thermal paste.  Thanks for the help.
GPUs run very hot, even when not doing 3D. My 7800 GT is running at 46C right now just in windows and I can't remember now what the shutdown temp used to be on my GPU (stupid redesigned NVIDIA control panel) but it was above 100C (think maybe 115C?).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 17, 2009, 09:41:10 PM
46 is very respectable for the 8800 chip. That one's pretty hot by nature. Keeping it at 54C while under stress is nothing short of a miracle, really.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 18, 2009, 10:59:47 AM
That's why I chose that card.  But since I've had to change my fan settings (unless multiple upgrades and downgrades made a bad tweak) when it used to work without problem, it had me worried.

I wonder if I can play Mass Effect without it crashing now.  Guess that's a test for this evening.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 18, 2009, 12:22:04 PM
My 8800gtx will crash with crysis at max (hacked for "dx10" effects in xp) at 1280x720. I think it runs around high 80s or so. Mid70s is normal, but it runs fine in most apps (except for mumbly mumbly EQ2 cities mumbly texture crash). I've thought about getting another heat-sink, but I just don't play Crysis instead. I do have rivatuner set the fans to 100% on it, because I can barely notice the difference in sound.

My color wheel in the DLP otoh....considering doing surgery to replace that. Been getting loud this year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 18, 2009, 06:56:13 PM
You might want to consider just cleaning whatever dust you may have sitting in you PC. I was getting consistent EQ2 client crashes recently. Opened up my case, and cleaned out the HSFs of my video card and CPU, and cleaned out my case fans.

Runs quieter and flawlessly....well, as flawless as I can get out of a 6+ year old PC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 19, 2009, 08:54:18 AM
No, it's always done that in a couple zones with max graphics. I can understand Neriak, Kelethin and Gorowyn, the head-scratcher is Pillar of Flames. Doesn't bug me, I've got a good profile saved for those zones, takes about 2 seconds to swap. I do dust my pc and it has filters at every ingress.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 19, 2009, 11:22:53 AM
Quick and stupid question.  What is the other dimension of 1080p on a TV?  I am about to connect my wife's new computer to the 52" LCD. :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 19, 2009, 11:59:32 AM
1920x1080


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on February 19, 2009, 02:18:06 PM
I'm heading over to Japan for work for a week.  I think I can use my laptop safely (transformer brick will handle 100V 60Hz), but can I similarly plug-in other things like a phone?

Basically, would small appliances have built in conversion for 120V->100V and from 60Hz->50Hz (I think that's correct amounts).  Thx.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 19, 2009, 02:44:16 PM
Check your power cable.  My phone could handle Asian voltages, however I still needed an adapter.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on February 19, 2009, 06:49:56 PM
So is there a clear cut "this is the one headset/mic to rule them all" product I can purchase or do I have to read a bunch of reviews?  My current headset's right ear is dead, it's a sennheiser which I've been pretty happy with.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 20, 2009, 09:02:48 AM
anyone ever hear of "backing" up the original adobe cs4 disks causing the originals to become no good (ie wont read in the dvd drives at work)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 20, 2009, 10:59:56 AM
anyone ever hear of "backing" up the original adobe cs4 disks causing the originals to become no good (ie wont read in the dvd drives at work)?
No, but given the fucking rootkit copy protection installed with that stuff it wouldn't surprise me if somehow, someway it actually did fuck something up.

http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b6bd8d?14


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 20, 2009, 09:58:17 PM
I think it's a coincidental combination of crappy adobe disks+ancient cheap dvd drives at work.  After thinking about it a bit Adobe seems to rely more on authenticating you cs4 session every time you launch the product than it does on protecting the install files.  Laptop was able to read the disk as well as one of the mac's at work, just all the old Dell's had issues.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on February 23, 2009, 12:04:12 AM
Ok, I somehow got a virus that un-formatted one of my harddrives, (I'm pretty sure all the data is still all on it...) anyone know the easiest way to get it off/format it with losing all my porn data?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 23, 2009, 05:50:57 AM
Put your porn disk into a linux machine?  If possible, cp things off, wipe the disk and replace porn.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on February 24, 2009, 02:40:04 AM
I just had to install SP2, I guess my drive has a newer standard of NTFS than what plain XP handles.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mortriden on February 26, 2009, 09:13:07 AM
Looking for a bit of help here.  I've got a Logitech G15 keyboard that recently has been acting up.  The issue is that the keyboard will, at random, turn off (keys go blank as does the LCD) and sit idle for roughly 30 sec.  It will then "reboot" and work for as long as 10 minutes; then repeat the process. 

Windows has quit recognizing it as a G15 and now refers to it as a Compatible HID in device manager. 

I have uninstalled the old drivers, and reinstaled new drivers from the logitech site (3.0.180 I believe).  No change.  I've tried different USB plugs, that doesn't seem to make a difference either. 

Is a BIOS update an option?

Windows Vista 32 bit
ASUS P5K-E
Intell Core 2 Duo
8800 GT


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 26, 2009, 11:11:41 AM
I just had to install SP2, I guess my drive has a newer standard of NTFS than what plain XP handles.

They are up to SP3 now, hoss.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 26, 2009, 01:14:44 PM
Mortriden: Those keyboards are not made to last. Mine lasted about 18 months then just died. LCD stopped working first then one day it did pretty much what you're describing. Throw it away, it's fuct. Cheap crap painted up pretty and over-priced tbh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 26, 2009, 05:08:56 PM
Good to know its a POS. I was tempted, and considering my current logitech wireless has lasted 4 years, I thought it would be worth it. Sigh, how the mighty have fallen.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on February 26, 2009, 06:06:11 PM
I just had to install SP2, I guess my drive has a newer standard of NTFS than what plain XP handles.

They are up to SP3 now, hoss.

Yeah, but it started working after SP2. I installed SP3 after posting.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 27, 2009, 03:19:31 AM
Good to know its a POS. I was tempted, and considering my current logitech wireless has lasted 4 years, I thought it would be worth it. Sigh, how the mighty have fallen.

Only thing I'd recommend it for is something like EVE with Ventrillo. Shows you who's talking on vent on the LCD, which is just fucking awesome  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 27, 2009, 07:34:23 AM
Quick tech question. e6600 on a P5W DH Deluxe mobo. Better to run the RAM at higher speed or lower latency?

800 4-4-4-12

or

1066 5-5-5-15


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rturja on February 28, 2009, 07:30:19 AM
Quick tech question. e6600 on a P5W DH Deluxe mobo. Better to run the RAM at higher speed or lower latency?

1066 5-5-5-15

Is the answer if the memory can handle the speed. Despite the latency, faster clock gives a potential of 200 million more memory operations/second. Those refresh values mean in practice the period between the refresh current is run through the chips and doesn't matter read or writespeeds drastically.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 01, 2009, 05:50:51 PM
Recommend an audio card.  150 USD max.  Usage will be gaming 80 percent of the time, music 10 percent, and movie/video 10 percent of the time.  Used exclusively with headphones.  Would LIKE to have USB output option if possible.  Vista 64 compatible.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 01, 2009, 06:25:05 PM
Recommend an audio card.  150 USD max.  Usage will be gaming 80 percent of the time, music 10 percent, and movie/video 10 percent of the time.  Used exclusively with headphones.  Would LIKE to have USB output option if possible.  Vista 64 compatible.

Thanks.
What do you mean by "USB output"?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 01, 2009, 07:50:59 PM
My headphones have USB thingies that they plug into - that then plug into the computer's USB ports.  Not married to it, but that's now the signal is processed in the Plantronics 777 (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/computer/pc-gaming-headsets/gamecom-777) and how the virtual surround is processed in the 770's (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/cat640035/cat1430032/prod5870007) (though this is used on my 360 primarily, so it's not a consideration).  In it's own right, they act as their own sound card(s). 

If need be, I can buy a different set of 5.1 surround headphones down the road - and just go with the 'regular' settings.  But I don't think there's a set with 5 seperate plugs for the 5.1 is there?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 01, 2009, 08:35:52 PM
My headphones have USB thingies that they plug into - that then plug into the computer's USB ports.  Not married to it, but that's now the signal is processed in the Plantronics 777 (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/computer/pc-gaming-headsets/gamecom-777) and how the virtual surround is processed in the 770's (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/cat640035/cat1430032/prod5870007) (though this is used on my 360 primarily, so it's not a consideration).  In it's own right, they act as their own sound card(s). 

If need be, I can buy a different set of 5.1 surround headphones down the road - and just go with the 'regular' settings.  But I don't think there's a set with 5 seperate plugs for the 5.1 is there?
Windows only allows a single sound output device to be active at a time. You will have to choose between your USB box or the sound card. You can't plug your USB box into a USB port on your computer and then somehow redirect the output of the sound card through it. Nor are there sound cards that have a USB input/output for connecting to such a box. Basically if you want to use a sound card you'll have to unplug your headphones from the USB box and plug in the mini-stereo jacks directly into the sound card bypassing the USB box.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 01, 2009, 09:48:29 PM
There are also tie-ins on sound cards that allow you to use the front jacks on most computer cases. The 'out' or headphone jack, and the mike jack are fairly common. That still doesn't allow you to use the USB port, but it alleviates the hassel of having to plug in headphones into the back of your box by switching out the speaker jack and plugging in the headphone jack.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 01, 2009, 09:55:37 PM
My headphones have USB thingies that they plug into - that then plug into the computer's USB ports.  Not married to it, but that's now the signal is processed in the Plantronics 777 (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/computer/pc-gaming-headsets/gamecom-777) and how the virtual surround is processed in the 770's (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/cat640035/cat1430032/prod5870007) (though this is used on my 360 primarily, so it's not a consideration).  In it's own right, they act as their own sound card(s). 

If need be, I can buy a different set of 5.1 surround headphones down the road - and just go with the 'regular' settings.  But I don't think there's a set with 5 seperate plugs for the 5.1 is there?
Windows only allows a single sound output device to be active at a time. You will have to choose between your USB box or the sound card. You can't plug your USB box into a USB port on your computer and then somehow redirect the output of the sound card through it. Nor are there sound cards that have a USB input/output for connecting to such a box. Basically if you want to use a sound card you'll have to unplug your headphones from the USB box and plug in the mini-stereo jacks directly into the sound card bypassing the USB box.


That's not what I'm looking to do. 

If the card supports 5.1 and has a USB output = awesome.
If the card doesn't have a USB output, but still supports 5.1 = not quite as awesome.  But workable.

Like I said, I'm not married to the USB dongle thing for the headphones.   Would be nice, but not a requirement.

Basically, just want a nice sound card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 01, 2009, 09:59:27 PM
I may be out of the loop, but are there even cards with USB jacks at all?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 02, 2009, 03:01:33 AM
My headphones have USB thingies that they plug into - that then plug into the computer's USB ports.  Not married to it, but that's now the signal is processed in the Plantronics 777 (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/computer/pc-gaming-headsets/gamecom-777) and how the virtual surround is processed in the 770's (http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/cat640035/cat1430032/prod5870007) (though this is used on my 360 primarily, so it's not a consideration).  In it's own right, they act as their own sound card(s). 

If need be, I can buy a different set of 5.1 surround headphones down the road - and just go with the 'regular' settings.  But I don't think there's a set with 5 seperate plugs for the 5.1 is there?
Windows only allows a single sound output device to be active at a time. You will have to choose between your USB box or the sound card. You can't plug your USB box into a USB port on your computer and then somehow redirect the output of the sound card through it. Nor are there sound cards that have a USB input/output for connecting to such a box. Basically if you want to use a sound card you'll have to unplug your headphones from the USB box and plug in the mini-stereo jacks directly into the sound card bypassing the USB box.

That's not what I'm looking to do. 

If the card supports 5.1 and has a USB output = awesome.
Like I said above you can't do that (and that is what you are looking to do since you've said it twice so I'm not sure why you said that you aren't).

Quote
If the card doesn't have a USB output, but still supports 5.1 = not quite as awesome.  But workable.
Most cards these days support 5/6/7.1 output.


I may be out of the loop, but are there even cards with USB jacks at all?
No. And even if they did they wouldn't do what SnakeCharmer is trying to do.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 02, 2009, 06:30:47 AM
Trippy - I'm not trying to run two different sound sources on the same card or from one card and one of the computers USB outputs or trying to run sound from the sound card to one of the computers/mobo's USB ports. 

Once more....

The headphones connect via a USB dongle thing (or rather, they have that option).  If I can connect to a sound card via the USB thing, awesome.  If not, not so awesome, but still doable.

What I *want* is a sound card that sends the 5.1 (6.1 or 7.1) signal via a USB output ON THE CARD ITSELF - NOT ANOTHER USB PORT ON THE COMPUTER/CASE.  No other ports on the card are going to be used.  Not any of the mini jacks, not the digital output, nothing.  [

b]Just the USB output on the card[/b].


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on March 02, 2009, 06:45:24 AM
Just the USB output on the card.

Again, there is no such thing.

USB headphones do work just fine though, there is no need to connect them directly to the card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on March 02, 2009, 06:54:11 AM
But you won't have that surround sound stuff, I'm guessing.

What I am wondering is how that thing works at all? Does it have all sorts of fancy drivers that work with the dongle, since use of the dongle means you don't need a dedicated sound card besides the integrated sound? Or, does it just fake the surround sound?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 02, 2009, 07:04:41 AM
Trippy - I'm not trying to run two different sound sources on the same card or from one card and one of the computers USB outputs or trying to run sound from the sound card to one of the computers/mobo's USB ports. 

Once more....

The headphones connect via a USB dongle thing (or rather, they have that option).  If I can connect to a sound card via the USB thing, awesome.  If not, not so awesome, but still doable.

What I *want* is a sound card that sends the 5.1 (6.1 or 7.1) signal via a USB output ON THE CARD ITSELF - NOT ANOTHER USB PORT ON THE COMPUTER/CASE.  No other ports on the card are going to be used.  Not any of the mini jacks, not the digital output, nothing.  [

b]Just the USB output on the card[/b].
Once again, no.

Though now I'm curious. What would you want to do with the USB output on the sound card (if such a thing existed which it doesn't) if you aren't trying to connect your USB dongle to it? Your headphones have regular stereo mini jack plugs when not plugged into the USB dongle. You said it's not necessary to use the dongle and yet you are insisting the sound card have it's own USB port. What you would be plugging into that USB port?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 02, 2009, 07:12:00 AM
But you won't have that surround sound stuff, I'm guessing.

What I am wondering is how that thing works at all? Does it have all sorts of fancy drivers that work with the dongle, since use of the dongle means you don't need a dedicated sound card besides the integrated sound? Or, does it just fake the surround sound?
It uses Dolby Headphone technology to create surround sound.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 02, 2009, 07:31:07 AM
Trippy - I'm not trying to run two different sound sources on the same card or from one card and one of the computers USB outputs or trying to run sound from the sound card to one of the computers/mobo's USB ports. 

Once more....

The headphones connect via a USB dongle thing (or rather, they have that option).  If I can connect to a sound card via the USB thing, awesome.  If not, not so awesome, but still doable.

What I *want* is a sound card that sends the 5.1 (6.1 or 7.1) signal via a USB output ON THE CARD ITSELF - NOT ANOTHER USB PORT ON THE COMPUTER/CASE.  No other ports on the card are going to be used.  Not any of the mini jacks, not the digital output, nothing.  [

b]Just the USB output on the card[/b].
Once again, no.

Though now I'm curious. What would you want to do with the USB output on the sound card (if such a thing existed which it doesn't) if you aren't trying to connect your USB dongle to it? Your headphones have regular stereo mini jack plugs when not plugged into the USB dongle. You said it's not necessary to use the dongle and yet you are insisting the sound card have it's own USB port. What you would be plugging into that USB port?


Because the 5.1 headphones won't be 5.1 without the USB dongle.   

Unless the soundcard can broadcast 5.1 from one minijack...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 02, 2009, 07:35:20 AM
Okay so I was right, you are trying to pass the sound card output into the USB dongle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on March 02, 2009, 07:41:51 AM
Because the 5.1 headphones won't be 5.1 without the USB dongle.   

Unless the soundcard can broadcast 5.1 from one minijack...

But you don't need to connect the usb headphones to a sound card to get 5.1 sound so why do you want to do that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rturja on March 02, 2009, 07:51:33 AM
The whole 'plug these into a Dolby compatible USB soundcard' looks like to be a bad translation or badly written marketese. From the information I gathered at Dolby website and the earphone manufacturer, the headphones already have that USB Dolby 5.1 chip in them - and for getting the surround sound, you just have to plug them into any available USB-port in the machine.

No need getting a dedicated card, if you are happy with the headphones.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 06, 2009, 01:37:03 PM
Ok so the RAM problem from a few weeks back persists. I think some of you were correct: will need Vista 64bit. Should I get it or survive on 3gb of RAM until Windows 7 comes along? And will Windows 7 support 4gb?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on March 06, 2009, 02:02:32 PM
So uhh, what's the deal if one of my fans (pretty sure it's the GPU fan) all of the sudden revs up really fast for like a half a second and then goes back to normal and repeats the same behavior.  I had this happening in the Empire: Total War campaign map but it never happened during the battles or anywhere else (or on any other game). 



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 06, 2009, 02:23:57 PM
what vid card is it? If its Nvidia, download nTune or Riva Tuner so you can manually set fan behavior. I'm not familiar enough with ATI to have advice


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on March 06, 2009, 02:26:08 PM
what vid card is it? If its Nvidia, download nTune or Riva Tuner so you can manually set fan behavior. I'm not familiar enough with ATI to have advice

8800 GTS.  I have RivaTuner just because nTune liked to reset it's fan setting after reboots.  I think it might be that the version of RivaTuner I had wasn't yet updated to the version of nVidia drivers I was using.  I'll try tonight. 



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rturja on March 06, 2009, 02:29:02 PM
Ok so the RAM problem from a few weeks back persists. I think some of you were correct: will need Vista 64bit. Should I get it or survive on 3gb of RAM until Windows 7 comes along? And will Windows 7 support 4gb?

Just to reiterate one thing - have you upgraded the bios? For example broken ACPI can cause funnies when you have the exact amount of RAM which processor can address. Another question is your processor, does it support 64bit addressing mode (make/model)?

With 4 gigs I'd go for 64 bit OS, whether it's Vista or W7, unless you have hardware that doesn't have 64bit drivers, although Vista does better job with 4 gigs without running through the loops then WinXP in 32 bit mode. Our mediacenter has been very stable with 32 bit Vista and 4 gigs of ram.

Speedwise the worst option would be running in 3 stick configuration - most of the speed with ram these days is gained by 'striping' them as a pair, and having 3 stick would drop the whole memory bandwidth significantly. So if at all possible solving the issue somehow would be optimal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 06, 2009, 02:57:30 PM
Good questions :-)

Power Supply: NZXT PRC-550 550W Power Supply (SLI-Ready)
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6600 (2x 2.4GHz)
Motherboard:  Asus P5N32-E SLI nForce® 680i SLI Chipset
Memory: Corsair XMS2 Xtreme 2x1024mb RAM
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
Sound: Creative Lab Sound Blaster X-Fi
Hard Drive: 250gb SATA-II 7200rpm

Whenever I've google'd this, I see posts about 680i having the kind of problems that only Vista 64 seems to fix. I have not updated the bios. I bought this in April 2007.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rturja on March 06, 2009, 03:29:09 PM
Okay, your processor is 64bit capable, so grabbing a copy of 64bit OS isn't a problem on that front.

I'd start by updating the bios first, in case it fixes the apparent addressing issue. I think the thing you are dealing with in there is the fact that basically a 32bit addressing mode can only see and use 4 gigs of memory, and that memory includes all the addresses needed for display and other peripherals. Something causes your MB to report some addresses wrong and later OS tries to access those as regular ram.

If bios upgrade doesn't help, then it's time to check the 64-bit readiness. Only a few programs have issues with it, but check in any case that everything you'll run can handle it. And check your hardware too, there are peripherals without 64-bit drivers.

At present I'm mildly sceptical in upgrading to 64bit Vista, because it seems that W7 is making a good progress out of the door and the reports I've heard have been mostly positive. I'm almost certain that you cannot just upgrade to W7 cheap, even if it is published soon. Of course there is always the option of downloading the beta and giving it a shot. Thus keeping Vista 32 for now, if at all possible, and upgrading to W7/64 later would for me seem like a better alternative.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 06, 2009, 05:29:51 PM
Cool, thanks rturja. I'm going to start with the bios update. If that doesn't do it, then I'll wait for 7.

The first and only time I got my computer to boot with all four sticks, it registered in Task Manager that I had 3.2gb of RAM, which according to various places is typical of Vista 32 not being able to see all four gigs, and usually followed shortly thereafter by a bsod and inability to successfully launch back into Windows. Which then proceeded to happen to me :-) That seems in line with your addresses/OS access comment.

I'm in no rush. Not doing much more than playing Dawn of War II these days and that's already maxxed out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rturja on March 07, 2009, 02:04:23 AM
Yup, that 3.2 gigs is expected. Hopefully the bios upgrade sorts out the rest!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 08, 2009, 07:03:35 AM
I think I might be joining the 3.2GB bandwagon (XP32). To my bafflement, I think I've had the first stick of crucial RAM go tits-up ever. I guess it didn't like being pushed to its rated speed after a couple years of running at 800. Been getting all kinds of crashes, culminating in lots of bsod friday night and yesterday.

Last night I pulled a stick and didn't crash for a couple hours. Blah. Looking at crucial's site, I may as well drop the extra $20 on a 2x2GB setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rturja on March 08, 2009, 07:35:52 AM
Sky, are you using the machine for music related things, like as a multitracker or sampler? Windows XP has a bit different memory allocation schema compared to Vista, giving only 2 gigs of ram for applications at most, unless tweaked a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 08, 2009, 08:57:05 AM
2 gig allocated is better than 2 gig total  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on March 12, 2009, 01:00:16 PM
So, it's finally time for me to pick up one of the current gen consoles, I didn't think bumping a 4 month old thread, derailing a ps3 thread, or starting a new one was worth it for these few questions. From what games I've seen and my type of play, it's clear that I want a PS3. I have a ps2, but one of the models with backwards compatibility would be nice. That said:

If I find one of the older ones that has backwards compatibility, will I lose out with lesser components in other areas on the old 60gb? I've been looking at the PS3 page in Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3) and see the 60gb had 4x usb and a flash card reader, whlie the newer 80/160gb versions only have 2 usb. Are the PS3 accessories taking advantage of the extra usb that would make me want that (I thought the sixaxis and Dual Shock 3 controllers were USB), and if so is it enough to pay the price of an old 60gb compared to buying a brand new and warrantied 80gb?
Since I'd drop one of my extra HDD in the system anyways, I don't think the flash card reader would be all that beneficial, but was there anything else that utilized that port? Any specific model number I should look for that would be better then another model for the backwards compatible and the non backwards compatible?

Or am I putting too much value in all these options the old 60gb version had, and I should just shut up and buy the current 80gb version as I won't really notice the difference and drop a new HDD in it?

Fake edit: Sorry, post is much longer then I thought it would be, bleh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 13, 2009, 12:35:01 AM
You could always get a new PS3 and keep the PS2 for playing the PS2 games.

Personally I don't think you'll miss the extra USB port if you got an older one though - I only ever use 1 USB port at a time to charge up whichever controller needs charging. Everything else is either bluetooth or comes through the ethernet cable, but there are plenty of accessories you can get if you were so inclined.

One other thing about getting an older one is that it'll be older and therefore maybe have a shorter lifespan. At least if you get a new one and it fails then you'll have a warranty.

End of the day I'd say it depends on a) how much you'll actually play the PS2 games and if so then b) how much of a hassle would it be to keep the PS2 for that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on March 13, 2009, 06:32:32 AM
You could always get a new PS3 and keep the PS2 for playing the PS2 games.

Personally I don't think you'll miss the extra USB port if you got an older one though - I only ever use 1 USB port at a time to charge up whichever controller needs charging. Everything else is either bluetooth or comes through the ethernet cable, but there are plenty of accessories you can get if you were so inclined.

One other thing about getting an older one is that it'll be older and therefore maybe have a shorter lifespan. At least if you get a new one and it fails then you'll have a warranty.

End of the day I'd say it depends on a) how much you'll actually play the PS2 games and if so then b) how much of a hassle would it be to keep the PS2 for that.


Thanks, that definitely helps quite a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 13, 2009, 05:40:02 PM
If it makes you feel any better, I have 2 60GB Launch PS3s and neither has shown any sort of notion that it will stop working. No strange lockups (except those KNOWN in any game - Re: GTA4, Ar Tonelico 2, etc) or anything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on March 14, 2009, 11:07:39 AM
If it makes you feel any better, I have 2 60GB Launch PS3s and neither has shown any sort of notion that it will stop working. No strange lockups (except those KNOWN in any game - Re: GTA4, Ar Tonelico 2, etc) or anything.

Do you use, or find a lot of reason to use, the extra USB ports? I looked over the accessories for PS3 (http://www.us.playstation.com/PS3/Accessories#fbid:0yzQMLDOnX6) (which I should have done in the first place, durrr ><) and see there really are only a few devices I'd use besides two controllers unless I'm missing something. Head set and memory card adapter seem about the only things to really take use of the USB. Any other suggestions I should consider or that aren't on that site that I should look for? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on March 14, 2009, 09:51:47 PM
I have a launch 20 gig, and I only use 3 ports as I'm too lazy to remove the GH3 and Rock Band dongles, and leave the drums plugged in. Though I can't remember the last time I used any of that crap, I have a charging base on my desk for the regular controller.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 15, 2009, 02:04:20 AM
Can someone email me the Helvetica and HelveticaNeue TTFs?

For iPhone mockups.


That was fast, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on March 16, 2009, 10:39:46 PM
what do people think of this spec?  I'm asking because I'm trying to understand current non-professional upper end and then what I can economize on. 

(hint: it's Valve future internal spec) (http://news.bigdownload.com/2009/02/21/valve-shares-their-pc-rigs-specs/#comments)

EVGA X58 3X SLI Intel Motherboard
Intel Corei7 940 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor
12GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1333MHz ram (Crucial Ballistix, Kingston ValueRam)
1 x NVidia GTX285 1GB - OR - ATI 4870 1GB graphics card
1 x 250GB 7200RPM SATA HD (Seagate, Western Digital)
1 x 500GB 7200RPM SATA HD (Seagate, Western Digital) Lian Li P60-F Case
Intel CPU Cooler
850W Antec power supply
1 x Dell 3008FPW-HC 30" LCD - OR - 2 x Dell 2001FP 20.1" LCD monitors
Windows Vista 64bit


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2009, 11:02:53 PM
Strange setup.

The RAM I can sort of see but that still seems a bit high. If you have a level editor, a separate 3D package, Photoshop, and the game itself running all that once that might take up 6 - 8 GB of RAM so I guess if you have some other crap running plus the OS you might get close to 12 GB. However they've screwed themselves in terms of future RAM expansion by filling up all 6 RAM slots with 2 GB boards instead of going to, say, 16 GB but only filling up 4 slots. Math is hard.

The hard drive setup is pathetic for a dev machine. 10K drives in a RAID 0 or 0+1 (or 1+0) config would've been what I would've expected. Given the amount of money wasted when a dev is sitting around twiddling his thumbs waiting for stuff to compile/generate/etc. getting more/faster drives is a small price to pay.

A pair of 20" monitors is a joke compared to the 30" in terms of price. I would've offered a pair of 24" or the 30".

what do people think of this spec?  I'm asking because I'm trying to understand current non-professional upper end and then what I can economize on. 
Those are dev machine specs. I wouldn't presume that those are the requirements for future Valve games.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on March 16, 2009, 11:07:03 PM
thanks. 

What of this?  Worth the investment?
Quote
EVGA X58 3X SLI Intel Motherboard
Intel Corei7 940 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2009, 11:09:38 PM
That CPU is kind of pricey still. The slower 920 is a better value, especially if you know how to overclock. The X58 is needed if you go with the i7s cause of the new socket/motherboard design (i.e. integrated memory controller and new bus design).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 17, 2009, 10:51:51 AM
Those are pathetically small and slow drives given the rest of the machine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 17, 2009, 10:58:15 AM
If I was building a monster system it would have at least 1 SSD for my OS drive and considering the cost of the rest of the system it certainly wouldn't be out of place.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 17, 2009, 12:06:12 PM
So I managed to put my new PC together today.

It boots, and Vista starts to install off the DVD, but it's sat doing nothing now (after I told it I was in the UK and to Install Now please) for a really long time. Like 10 minutes now saying "Please wait..." with an hourglass symbol.

How long should it take? Will I know right away if I've fucked up the CPU/heatsink bit or will it wait until it gets hot before exploding?

Hold me, I'm scared!  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on March 17, 2009, 12:18:45 PM
That's scary. Is there mouse activity or isn't there supposed to be any at this stage of the install?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 17, 2009, 12:22:14 PM
So I managed to put my new PC together today.

It boots, and Vista starts to install off the DVD, but it's sat doing nothing now (after I told it I was in the UK and to Install Now please) for a really long time. Like 10 minutes now saying "Please wait..." with an hourglass symbol.

How long should it take? Will I know right away if I've fucked up the CPU/heatsink bit or will it wait until it gets hot before exploding?

Hold me, I'm scared!  :uhrr:
No idea on the Vista install stalling (don't use it). For the CPU/heatsink you can just touch it yourself to check. It will shut itself down if it gets too hot so you can't really "fry" a CPU from too much heat like you could in the past.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 17, 2009, 12:23:12 PM
Awesome thanks Trippy.

While you were replying Vista came to life and carried on installing, I was just being a girly wuss  :drillf:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 17, 2009, 12:28:11 PM
Most BIOSes these days have their own hardware temp monitors. You can check there before the OS if you're worried. Also, they may be a bit more accurate about temp reporting than 3rd party apps you download.

Grats on the new build, btw.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 17, 2009, 12:29:08 PM
Did you hook up a network cable to it? It might have been trying to make a network connection with a really long timeout timer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 17, 2009, 07:11:07 PM
So. I rearranged my monitors. Ventrilo is launching off of the primary monitor space. Right-clicking on the icon bar brings up things I can't use (like move and resize, there is no maximize option). How can I get that window back onto a monitor?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on March 17, 2009, 09:26:38 PM
Have you tried hitting move and dragging it in random directions with the hope that it appears on your monitor(s)?

Failing that, set your PC back to displaying onto your primary monitor only; then open Vent (it should open visibly since it has nowhere else to do so; doing this lets Vent know where to open. Might want to drag it around a little just to make sure it saves its changed position). Then close it, and re-setup your multiple monitors.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 17, 2009, 09:33:20 PM
Nah, I got it. Alt+Space+M then use arrow keys.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 18, 2009, 12:12:31 AM
Most BIOSes these days have their own hardware temp monitors. You can check there before the OS if you're worried. Also, they may be a bit more accurate about temp reporting than 3rd party apps you download.

Grats on the new build, btw.

Discovered it, cheers :)  It also has a thingy that give me a browser, IM, email and all sorts of other stuff before even loading the OS if I want. Nifty! These newfangled doohickeys, what will they come up with next!

Did you hook up a network cable to it? It might have been trying to make a network connection with a really long timeout timer.
Yeah could have been something like that, when Vista did finish installing it wasn't happy with the network for ages until I decided to actually put the CD with the motherboard drivers in  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 18, 2009, 12:59:49 AM
Hrmmm can anyone recommend a good, free firewall for Vista 64? I've used Sunbelt for ages but it's 32-bit only  :sad:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 18, 2009, 08:38:48 AM
I'm happy with Window's Firewall on my home machines as long as I have a good virus scanner and am behind a router.  (My work machines don't even have the router and they're on a university network and do fine.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 19, 2009, 11:33:08 AM
So, i upgraded my laptop, i went from 2 sticks of 1gb, to two sticks of 2gb. However in the properties panel, it says there are only 3gb installed. The video card on the laptop is a x1400 (ATI i think) and says it can use up to 512 ram. (shared of course).

However in the bios, i can't change the list amount of memory, and there is a listing for the Video cards allotment, its set to 128 mb. I can't change any of this, cant even use the arrow keys to get to them. The laptop is running Windows XP.

Any suggestions? More info needed, is so, what?

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 19, 2009, 11:40:01 AM
The laptop is running Windows XP.

That's your problem.  You need a 64 bit OS - either XP Pro 64, or Vista Premium.

I'm 99.9 percent sure on that.

If you're wanting to stick with XP Pro 64, I've got an unused copy at home you can have for way cheap.  Let me know if interested.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 19, 2009, 12:30:21 PM
I was hopeing this wasn't the issue. Its only a dual core laptop, not sure if i care enough to upgrade its OS right now. The video card allotment is still in question, and a problem.

So XP only does up to 3 gigs? That's an odd number.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on March 19, 2009, 12:39:44 PM
Trippy will come to the rescue and explain everything.

Your 32 bit OS wants you to upgrade.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 19, 2009, 01:55:33 PM
So, i upgraded my laptop, i went from 2 sticks of 1gb, to two sticks of 2gb. However in the properties panel, it says there are only 3gb installed. The video card on the laptop is a x1400 (ATI i think) and says it can use up to 512 ram. (shared of course).

However in the bios, i can't change the list amount of memory, and there is a listing for the Video cards allotment, its set to 128 mb. I can't change any of this, cant even use the arrow keys to get to them. The laptop is running Windows XP.

Any suggestions? More info needed, is so, what?

Thanks.
What's the laptop model?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 19, 2009, 01:56:42 PM
The laptop is running Windows XP.

That's your problem.  You need a 64 bit OS - either XP Pro 64, or Vista Premium.

I'm 99.9 percent sure on that.

If you're wanting to stick with XP Pro 64, I've got an unused copy at home you can have for way cheap.  Let me know if interested.
XP Pro 64 actually has no value, so I find your offer intriguing. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 20, 2009, 05:42:43 AM
So, i upgraded my laptop, i went from 2 sticks of 1gb, to two sticks of 2gb. However in the properties panel, it says there are only 3gb installed. The video card on the laptop is a x1400 (ATI i think) and says it can use up to 512 ram. (shared of course).

However in the bios, i can't change the list amount of memory, and there is a listing for the Video cards allotment, its set to 128 mb. I can't change any of this, cant even use the arrow keys to get to them. The laptop is running Windows XP.

Any suggestions? More info needed, is so, what?

Thanks.
What's the laptop model?


Acer Aspire 5670. Intel Core Duo 1.66 (i think), 2gb ram (was)  ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 512 MB (this is what it says right on the sticker i never took off, bios says 128) 120gb HD. Its about 2-3 years old, and has been a great laptop, even now. I beta tested Vanguard on it (on rather high settings too), and my girl uses it for LOTRO. That's the main reason i was trying to squeeze a bit more out of it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 20, 2009, 10:45:13 AM
Not sure how well this works on mobile GPUs but run this (or something similiar) to ID your GPU:

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/

You might actually have the Mobile X1400 that has 128 MB of dedicated VRAM instead of shared RAM. Check the memory type. If it's GDDR3 then it looks like you have the dedicated VRAM model.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 20, 2009, 11:16:53 AM
Not sure how well this works on mobile GPUs but run this (or something similiar) to ID your GPU:

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/

You might actually have the Mobile X1400 that has 128 MB of dedicated VRAM instead of shared RAM. Check the memory type. If it's GDDR3 then it looks like you have the dedicated VRAM model.


I will check, but that would be contrary to what i bought if true. Unless it has 128, but can pull down another 128 if it wants to from system. If that last bit is the case, then i guess all is well, other than the missing 1 gig system memory.

Thanks, ill post back when i get the datas!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 20, 2009, 05:04:28 PM
Thinking of upgrading for no other reason than to do it.  Currently running 8800GTS G92's in SLI.  Considering going with a GTX 260 OC, possibly even SLI'ing that.  Resolution is 1920x1200.

Thoughts?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on March 20, 2009, 07:55:53 PM
Do you have more money than sense? If so, it's a good plan.
At 1920x1200, 8800gt sli should just about max out in everything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 20, 2009, 08:41:31 PM
Do you have more money than sense?

If I only had a nickle to my name, I'd have more money than sense...

Quote
If so, it's a good plan.
At 1920x1200, 8800gt sli should just about max out in everything.

It comes close.  I suppose that if I wouldn't see an anecdotal 50 percent improvement in quality and framerate, I wouldn't do it.  FWIW, the proc is Q6600 (oc'd to 3.2Ghz) and 8GB of RAM.

Just kinda curious. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 20, 2009, 09:24:58 PM
isn't there a significant difference between a GT and  GTS in the 8800 series?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 20, 2009, 11:29:27 PM
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. It really seems to vary with the test:

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/benchmarks,30.html

If you're buying a new card you haven't got to spend much more to get you up to a 9800GTX+ or a GT250. The Radeon 4830 or 4850 would be good choices around that price point too.

The Best Graphics Cards For The Money: March '09 (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-radeon,2218.html) article on TH is pretty informative and brief.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 21, 2009, 10:06:47 PM
This is just a public service announcement.

I noticed over the last few weeks that my machine's fans were going into over drive when I was playing high processing games. I checked my temps, and sure enough, my CPU was idling at ~48C and approaching 67C under load! This was vexing because when I first installed my heatsink and fan assembly for my CPU, the temps were ~34C idle and low 50s under load.

This morning I undertook the hidious process of removing the heatsink and discovering a lot of dust and even dust bunnies accumulated between the fins. I also reapplied thermal paste. I put it all back together and lo and behold, the temps are back to the original ones.

So, in essence, it may be a good idea to reapply paste and check the grime on your CPU heatsink fins every 6 months or so.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 22, 2009, 12:37:02 AM
I always have massive dust problems with my PCs. Two cats in the house, our cavalier attitude towards doing housework and PC cases with plenty of huge fans means that they hoover up metric fucktons of fur and dust.

Reminds me, I need to find a cheap source for compressed air cans in the UK....


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 23, 2009, 08:36:06 AM
I've got filters on my intakes. Still get a bit of dust in there, but nowhere near the evil den of bunnies I've had in the past, and now I've added a cat to the equation.

On video cards: check the pipe widths. Even when I built my pc two years ago, there were a lot of cards with wimpy pipes (128bit) out there. For reference, my 9800pro had 256bit pipes. It made a huuuge difference. I see some with 512bit, that's gotta be pretty sweet. My 8800gtx is 384 or something, runs pretty sweet. Though at this point, 1280x720 for the max settings win.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 23, 2009, 10:48:06 AM
I've got filters on my intakes. Still get a bit of dust in there, but nowhere near the evil den of bunnies I've had in the past, and now I've added a cat to the equation.

Using a cat as a filtration device runs counter to conventional wisdom.  Do you shave it first?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 23, 2009, 11:46:54 AM
No, I added filters to the cat.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lucas on March 27, 2009, 08:09:12 AM
Guys, do you know of any article talking about the next wave of Nvidia graphic cards? Meaning, what's to come after the 2xx series? Just wondering 'cause next Xmas (yeah, I like to plan ahead) I'll probably make a total-global-ultra upgrade of my beast and since I still have a fantastic 8800 GTS 640MB (bought it at the end of 2006 and it is still rockin') I want to stick with Nvidia. Thanks :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miguel on March 27, 2009, 11:53:57 AM
There's this (it basically likes up with your timeframe):

Leaked GeForce driver hints at GT212, GT215, GT216, and GT218 GPUs

Leaked ForceWare 185 drivers provided by German site Hardware Infos hint at several upcoming GeForce GT2xx GPUs. According to ATI-Forum.de, GT212, GT215, GT216, and GT218 GPUs are all mentioned in the driver device list. All of these GPUs are expected to be built around TSMC's 40-nm manufacturing process, with recent rumors suggesting GT212 will replace today's 55-nm GT200b GPUs, while GT216 is expected to displace G96 and GT218 will replace G98 for the entry-level segment.  The unknown here is GT215. This is the first time GT215 has surfaced anywhere. GT214 is expected to be NVIDIA's G94 replacement, but no one outside of NVIDIA knows how GT215 relates to GT214. While previous rumors have suggested NVIDIA's first 40-nm GPUs could arrive during late Q2 or Q3'09, their appearance in a leaked ForceWare driver could suggest an even earlier arrival.


Anything about newer GPU's would probably only be the result of a blatant NDA violation. ;)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 27, 2009, 12:00:57 PM
You know what would rule? GPUs with smaller transistors like this 45 nm so that I wouldn't be able to slow-roast a suckling pig in my case.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 27, 2009, 12:48:31 PM
Guys, do you know of any article talking about the next wave of Nvidia graphic cards? Meaning, what's to come after the 2xx series? Just wondering 'cause next Xmas (yeah, I like to plan ahead) I'll probably make a total-global-ultra upgrade of my beast and since I still have a fantastic 8800 GTS 640MB (bought it at the end of 2006 and it is still rockin') I want to stick with Nvidia. Thanks :)
The GT300 is the one you want to check in on in about 6 months. It's their high end DX11 card core that's supposed to be out Q4 09.

Edit: that's a core not a card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 27, 2009, 01:37:49 PM
Is dx11 going to be anything? I got pretty pissed about the dx10 thing being 'vista only' and then patching my crysis demo to get all the "dx10" effects in xp. At this point I'm only interested in features, not raw speed, being res-locked to 720p. I see this as a good thing, better effects and fsaa/af and shadows and normal mapping and whatnot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 27, 2009, 01:55:15 PM
DirectX 11 is mostly a performance update. It'll better support multi-treading and have an API for using GPUs as general purpose CPUs (GPGPU). Some of the enhancements like some of the multi-threading stuff will work on non-DX11 specific cards so it's not clear yet what a DX11-specific card gets you over a DX10/9 card. Windows 7 will ship with DirectX 11 and it'll be available for Vista as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on March 28, 2009, 11:11:11 AM
I'm looking for a new GFX card 512mb+ I only got about $200 to spend anyone know what's the best bang for buck around at the moment?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 28, 2009, 02:15:33 PM
I found this link to be a good read, although there are a lot of ties:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/benchmarks,30.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on March 30, 2009, 07:30:48 AM
Found this scored quite high on Tom's benchmarks and works out about $210.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-114-OK&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=927


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 31, 2009, 07:20:03 AM
I don't know how quick this will be, but my wife has trouble with USB hard drives.  She has had at least two PCs at her desk and managed to go through at least 4 USB external drives in record time.  Sometimes I can plug them into my PC and they work, sometimes they don't and never do after that.  Last one was a very new WD MyBook that required some repair when I plugged it into my machine.  I gave her the disk and the USB cable I used, but it would not even spin up at her desk.

Currently the only thing I can think is that the power at her desk, or perhaps entire office, is the culprit.  Let's assume no one wants to rewire the office during these uncertain times, what might be done here?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 31, 2009, 08:03:52 AM
You can get a clean source of power by using a UPS. I used to have very flaky power in my old flat from the 40s and using this guy  (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16842101004) helped solve that straight away.

That said, it may be either your or your wife's power supply itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 31, 2009, 08:09:10 AM
If you mean the PC PSU, she has different ones due to having different PCs.  If you mean the wall-wart that comes with the USB drive, she says she uses the one that comes with it each time so there is no commonality there.  Also I don't have this issue.

I was hoping I would not have to suggest a UPS, but then I won't be paying for it so I might as well.  Turns out that everything at her desk connects to one electrical outlet and I'm not entirely sure a UPS will fix something like an overtapped circuit.  If that's the issue, I fear I'm looking for a bandage when I need a limb replacement.

Edit for clarity.  It is probably not apparent that her office is not in my house.  It is in the ramshackle tinderbox that passes for her place of business.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 31, 2009, 09:21:20 AM
You could try a maxtor mini, draws all of it's power via the USB ports, I really like mine as it is fairly compact and I don't have to lug a power brick around with it.

UPS: It's been a 4-5 years since i checked but last time I was in the market for 1 most of these were passive which probably wouldn't solve a dirty power problem much more than a power strip would.  Now if you can find an active UPS that may prove to be helpful, although it won't magically make an overloaded circuit start delivering more juice, it will convert shitty power (lots of fluctuations) to clean power (pure sine wave).

How much equipment is she running off her single outlet?  A full system (cpu/monitor or 2/printer/wireless router/cable modem) can easily run off one of the workstation level 1000/1100va UPS's for at least 30 minutes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 31, 2009, 12:27:14 PM
This actually is an excellent question, regarding active vs passive. My perhaps misinformed understanding is that APC ups have two type of outlets: one bank with is just a surge protected passthrough, and another bank which is actually battery supported. My understanding is that the battery supported outlets actually provide the clean power source, whereas the passthrough ones are just protected against bad surges. Any info you guys have would be very much appreicated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 31, 2009, 12:36:31 PM
Yes in a nutshell, active (i believe tripp lite calls theirs interactive) essentially puts the battery between you and the power source, where passive only switches (very rapidly) to battery power when the power source is not available.  Looking at the tripp lite site it appears that you can get an active 700va interactive (http://www.tripplite.com/EN/products/model.cfm?txtSeriesID=665&EID=13901&txtModelID=23) for $250.  Nothing here against APC (I had 2 smart UPS 3ks in my server room that were rock steady) but the last few personal UPS's I have had were tripp lite and I am simply a bit more familiar with them.

Edit: 700va should be enough to run your core computer components off of for 30-45minutes (cpu, single monitor and cable modem) but you are mostly interested in power quality so that is just icing i suppose.  Also, you may want to investigate the other reason I am more familiar with tripp lite, Costco looks to have a great deal on a 1500va interactive UPS (http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11234507&search=UPS&Mo=2&cm_re=1_en-_-Top_Left_Nav-_-Top_search&lang=en-US&Nr=P_CatalogName:BC&Sp=S&N=4001486&whse=BC&Dx=mode+matchallpartial&Ntk=Text_Search&Dr=P_CatalogName:BC&Ne=4000000&D=UPS&eCat=BC|84&Ntt=UPS&No=2&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&Nty=1&topnav=&s=1)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 31, 2009, 12:43:54 PM
If you are worried about the power coming out of your wall you don't want just an UPS, you want one with "Automatic Voltage Regulation" (AVR). AVR UPSes generate a steady amount of voltage instead of just kicking in when the voltage drops too low which is what Salamok is referring to.

Also, if you really really concerned about your power and you believe the marketing hype (which I don't) get a UPS that generates a sine wave instead of a square wave for it's power.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 31, 2009, 12:51:28 PM
hmm the target audience seems to have changed since i last reviewed specs for UPS's they used to all shoot for a half hour of battery backup, looks like the UPS's i just posted are geared more for clean power and just enough backup power to get you shut down (3-15 minutes depending on model and load).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 31, 2009, 12:52:07 PM
Also, if you really really concerned about your power and you believe the marketing hype (which I don't) get a UPS that generates a sine wave instead of a square wave for it's power.

I'm either too smart or too stupid to believe this makes a difference, unless it's that the sine is worse.

I don't know how much juice is on that circuit she is using but my educated guess is "not enough".  Fluctuations could be from "bad power" or from devices firing up, like a printer.  She has too many things for a single outlet, I know that, but she won't be able to have the office rewired until her brother is convinced.

Consensus seem to be that power fluctuations toward the low end can destroy a USB disk.  I'll see about the low-power ones, since I'll be buying yet another one anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 31, 2009, 12:57:47 PM
Also, if you really really concerned about your power and you believe the marketing hype (which I don't) get a UPS that generates a sine wave instead of a square wave for it's power.
I'm either too smart or too stupid to believe this makes a difference, unless it's that the sine is worse.
Sine is "better", it's what's coming out of your wall socket and the form of power your electronic equipment was designed to. Many UPSes, however, generate something closer to a square wave for it's power, presumably cause it's less expensive than generating a pure sine wave.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 31, 2009, 01:44:51 PM
I'd kind of lean more towards the negligable benefit of having a pure sine wave.  The main benefit has to do with power loss over a large distance (which is why this is what the electric co sends you in the 1st place), combine this with the operating envelope of pretty much all consumer electronics and the benefit to the end user is pretty much invisible.  The square wave coming off a UPS is still going to be filtered to the point that it will stay within the peaks and valleys of a pure sine wave and that is probably the important aspect.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 01, 2009, 09:19:10 AM
You don't think the sharp edges might cause extra wear on the electronics? :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 01, 2009, 09:38:36 AM
I think that is what they are saying.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 02, 2009, 08:38:11 AM
I found this link to be a good read, although there are a lot of ties:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/benchmarks,30.html

Thanks for that it totally helped and the GTX 260 is in the post only thing is I now need to upgrade the power supply which should be fun.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tige on April 02, 2009, 06:09:19 PM
Is there any way to connect a PS2 to a monitor that has a DVI-D and a HD15 connection?       


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 02, 2009, 06:30:37 PM
Is there any way to connect a PS2 to a monitor that has a DVI-D and a HD15 connection?       
You need an S-Video/Component to VGA converter box. I don't have mine with me at my new location so I can't take a pic of it and show you what mine looks like but that's what I used to display my previous gen consoles (PS2/Xbox/GC) on my computer monitor.

Edit: here are some examples (http://www.ramelectronics.net/audio-video/video-converters/s-video-to-vga/c10000-c11200-c11205.html?sorter=productname-en-asc)





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tige on April 02, 2009, 06:46:21 PM
Is there any way to connect a PS2 to a monitor that has a DVI-D and a HD15 connection?       
You need an S-Video/Component to VGA converter box. I don't have mine with me at my new location so I can't take a pic of it and show you what mine looks like but that's what I used to display my previous gen consoles (PS2/Xbox/GC) on my computer monitor.

Edit: here are some examples (http://www.ramelectronics.net/audio-video/video-converters/s-video-to-vga/c10000-c11200-c11205.html?sorter=productname-en-asc)


Gracias.

edit:  Checked amazon a saw a handful of reviews bitching about loss of picture quality.  If you have decent monitor/converter is that an issue or is it just the nature of these things to have some visual degredation?  Curious if text would wind up blurry.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 03, 2009, 06:15:59 AM
I'd think that component-to-vga would give the best picture, but I have not tried this.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 03, 2009, 06:48:07 AM
Component would give the best picture but S-Video works fine as long as the converter is decent enough. Mine "upscales" to 1024 x 768 and the text is fine (I played stuff like FF XII through it).

Edit: also to clarify, things typically aren't going to look the same even if the converter did a "perfect" conversion job. PS2 games are "calibrated" to look their best on CRT TV-only displays. CRT computer monitors don't follow the same design specs as CRT TVs so material created for CRT TV displays don't look the same on CRT computer monitors. The same applies to CRT TV-designed material being shown on other types of computer displays like LCDs. With HDTV materials things converge more but even then there are differences.

In my previous setup the PS2 images on my Sony CRT TV are quite a bit brighter and more the colors more "vibrant" compared to what is shown on my Sony CRT monitors.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on April 03, 2009, 04:08:47 PM
So, DivX plug in has started crashing Firefox, IE and Opera and crashes in Chrome whenever I have a DivX movie try to load. It's just started happening after I moved into University halls so possibly being on their network is causing it but I'd have imagined that would result in error messages rather than the plug-in crashing any time it tries to play. Seen a few things on it having browser specific issues but this seems to be DivX itself. Anyone else seeing anything similar? Or have any ideas what it could be?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 04, 2009, 08:49:28 AM
Last few releases of Divx have done nothing but piss me off, like they sold out to the competition and tanked their own product.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 04, 2009, 04:56:02 PM
Divx's own MPEG-4 codec stopped being relevant a while ago when they were no longer able to compete with the work the Xvid guys were/are doing as they spent more time taking features *out* of their products instead of improving them. They are trying to be relevant again by buying out MainConcept and going with the H.264/MKV combo which has become the standard for HD reencodes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on April 06, 2009, 08:09:33 AM
I have a honeypot on one my work computers, all traffic is normal except for UDP port 1434.  Random computers are sending a packet to it that is 02 in hex.  There is no way the honeypot requested it (it's low interaction) so I'm trying to figure out why the aforementioned random computers are sending 02 to it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 06, 2009, 08:23:21 AM
Found this on the internets. Not sure if its of any help:

http://www.websecurity.mobi/computer-security/692-firewall-reports-attck-udp-port-1434-a.html

Btw, what the heck is a honeypot?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on April 06, 2009, 11:46:30 AM
Btw, what the heck is a honeypot?

A computer all dressed up in drag waiting for someone to come screw it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 06, 2009, 12:10:35 PM
So, DivX plug in has started crashing Firefox, IE and Opera and crashes in Chrome whenever I have a DivX movie try to load. It's just started happening after I moved into University halls so possibly being on their network is causing it but I'd have imagined that would result in error messages rather than the plug-in crashing any time it tries to play. Seen a few things on it having browser specific issues but this seems to be DivX itself. Anyone else seeing anything similar? Or have any ideas what it could be?
If it started happening after you moved in, and given University residence hall network's plague-riddled existances, I'd recommend doing as many virus scans from as many providers as you can manage.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on April 06, 2009, 12:21:32 PM
That isn't it, really I just posted this for anyone who does Enterprise IT.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 06, 2009, 12:46:48 PM
Sounds much like this this (http://www.developmentnow.com/g/107_2006_8_0_0_814684/Broadcast-on-UDP1434.htm), try stopping the "SQL Server Service Manager" service.  Also double check that you don't have an ip conflict with another machine on the network...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on April 06, 2009, 01:18:21 PM
Sounds much like this this (http://www.developmentnow.com/g/107_2006_8_0_0_814684/Broadcast-on-UDP1434.htm), try stopping the "SQL Server Service Manager" service.  Also double check that you don't have an ip conflict with another machine on the network...

Stupid MSDE is broadcasting, you hit it right on the nose!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 06, 2009, 01:31:28 PM
Sounds much like this this (http://www.developmentnow.com/g/107_2006_8_0_0_814684/Broadcast-on-UDP1434.htm), try stopping the "SQL Server Service Manager" service.  Also double check that you don't have an ip conflict with another machine on the network...

Stupid MSDE is broadcasting, you hit it right on the nose!

And here I am not even an enterprise IT professional! ;P


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ookii on April 06, 2009, 01:42:56 PM
Your google-fu is strong then sir.  I am too tired to do anything properly today!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 06, 2009, 01:54:40 PM
well to be honest I do have more than a little smidge of IT in my background and once I saw that SQL server uses that port my 1st instinct was some piss poor implementation of that piece of crap that is MSDE.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 06, 2009, 02:48:43 PM
Btw, what the heck is a honeypot?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeypot_(computing)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on April 08, 2009, 07:04:05 PM
Not really a tech question per se, but what's everyone's choice of a media player these days?  I really don't like WMP, and haven't used winamp in years so I have no idea if it's any good still.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on April 08, 2009, 07:06:40 PM
VLC Player with CCCP (Combined Community Codec Pack) installed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 08, 2009, 08:42:39 PM
Not really a tech question per se, but what's everyone's choice of a media player these days?  I really don't like WMP, and haven't used winamp in years so I have no idea if it's any good still.
foobar2000 on Windows. Haven't found anything I'm happy with yet on Mac but I'm mostly using Songbird. All I need is something that launches super fast, doesn't use a ton of resources, and includes basic play list support. Most players are either bloated monstrosities or totally stripped down without any playlist support.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on April 08, 2009, 09:36:07 PM
oh. music, not porn, my bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 08, 2009, 10:01:36 PM
He mentioned Winamp so I assumed he meant music but I guess these days Winamp plays video as well so I don't know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 08, 2009, 10:52:15 PM
I don't have any problems with winamp as long as you keep an eye on it when installing - pare it down to the minimum and don't let it installl the media library and winamp agent stuff. There's always Media Player Classic too which now has a 64 bit version that seems to work ok.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 09, 2009, 08:46:46 AM
iToooooones! Surprise, cockfags!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on April 09, 2009, 09:01:33 AM
I use mplayer on windows and linux, with the mpui frontend on windows 7. This windows build (http://mulder.dummwiedeutsch.de/home/?page=projects#mplayer) to be specific.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 09, 2009, 11:14:12 AM
I kind of like the cowon/jet audio player.  The only problem I have with it is the web driven add/splash screen that occasional comes up when you open it (also occasional has an error in said splashscreen).  I use the cowon player at work and iTunes at home, I really do not like iTunes but my wife has an ipod and iTunes invaded all user accounts of the PC when installed and I haven't bothered to kick it off my account yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 09, 2009, 04:39:16 PM
So my computer decided to not start up any more. I press the front button, nothing. I turn off the switch in the back and turn it on: lights turn on, fan on the cooling system turns on, fan on the power supply turns on, they all run for 3 seconds and then the whole thing shuts down. Hard drive never even starts spinning up. The computer at least starts the drive checks because I can see the CD-ROM tray lights turn on for a bit.

First thought was power supply. Never replaced one but it looks pretty straightforward (in theory). Just can't see how it'd turn on for a second and then turn off though. There circuit breakers in these things?

Second thought was complete hard drive meltdown. Can't see how it'd go without any of the warning signs at all, but wouldn't be surprising.

Third thought is this little button cell battery on the mobo. Back in the way old days I had to replace the 6v battery on my Power Computer Mac like three times in it's life, and it wouldn't work unless I replaced the battery. That was 15 years ago or so though, and I can't imagine they still design them like that.

Help?

Specs:
Power Supply: NZXT PRC-550 550W Power Supply (SLI-Ready)
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6600 (2x 2.4GHz)
Motherboard:  Asus P5N32-E SLI nForce® 680i SLI Chipset
Memory: Corsair XMS2 Xtreme 2x1024mb RAM
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
Sound: Creative Lab Sound Blaster X-Fi
Hard Drive: 250gb SATA-II 7200rpm
CD/DVD Drive ( 16x DVD-ROM Drive)
CD-RW/DVD-RW Drive 18X Dual Format/Double Layer DVD±R/±RW + CD-R/RW)
Intel Pro 10/100/1000 Network Card
 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 09, 2009, 05:02:05 PM
Does your MB have a tiny speaker and is it hooked up? Do you have a little POST code display on the MB?

I would disconnect the cables from all the drives, pull out the sound card and network card, recheck the power cable to the MB, the CPU fan connector and the connector from the power switch to the motherboard and see if you can get to the startup screen and enter the BIOS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 09, 2009, 05:28:44 PM
No tiny speaker I could see and know POST code display. I assume the latter is some sort of LED/LCD, and couldn't find one.

I disconnected both CD-ROMs, the HD, removed this secondary audio card thing, removed the SoundBlaster, even removed the 8800 GTS. Couldn't remove the network card since that appears to be integrated on the mobo.

Same result: starts up for 2-3 seconds, turns off.

I did notice something else I've never seen before though: on the back of the computer is this Blue LED light next to the word "Combined". It's part of the power supply. When the computer turns on, that turns on, but it is dim. Then when the computer shuts off, it flares very bright then dims back down to dim again.

That seems ominous...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 09, 2009, 05:48:51 PM
Apparently that power supply can either run with the 12V power split between the two lines or combined into one.

Is the CPU fan spinning on power up?

I'd try another power supply.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 09, 2009, 05:56:27 PM
The CPU fan and the Power Supply fan both start spinning up. But then shut off with everything else.

Any advice on a new power supply of equivalent (or greater) capacity? I don't think I have one I can throw in here that's got capacity for what's loaded. The board lacks integrated video so at the very least I need the drive and vidcard in to get to a BIOS screen. So I'll need to order one.

Which is fine since I'm headed out for the holiday anyway. Wouldn't mind having a new supply from Newegg waiting for me when I get back. Just don't want to order the wrong one.

Oh, and I've never installed one before. But I'll learn  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 09, 2009, 06:00:28 PM
You can put in a (relatively) wimpy one just to test things out. An unloaded CPU and GPU draw much less power so you don't need the full 550 Watts of your current one.

You don't need a drive for the BIOS screen.

Look at the Advice on a New Rig thread near the end for suggestions we gave to Strazos for his power supply which is about your range.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 09, 2009, 06:30:37 PM
So, I used some PSU load calculator and it said that I needed ~680 watts. My current 700 watt Truepower (Thermaltake) is starting to be very loud under load. Its got some crazed 14" fan that's just gotten louder over time. Stands to reason, I guess, but I thing I want a new one. So, let me break it down for you guys and see what you think:

At least 5 SATA2 drives with 4 in raid5
4x1 gigs of DDR2 ram
A modern higher end vid card
DVD/BlueRay player
dedicated sound card
4 12" fans (two front, one rear and one for CPU)

Bearing in mind that I will probably be upgrading at the very least my vid card from an 8800GT to a 200 series Nvidia (prolly the new 275) and will eventually go for a DDR3 set of ram & new intel chip, what do you guys suggest?

How important is Active Power?
Good experiences with modular cabling PSUs?
SILENCE is golden, especially with 5 active fans in the case already

Brand recommendations? PC Power & Cooling is now owned by OCZ and they don't seem to be making higher end PSUs, at least not the modular type.

Antec seems to have some patented temp/fanspeed regulation in their PSUs. Are they worth fussing over or should I go for something simpler?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 09, 2009, 06:52:34 PM
How important is Active Power?
Read this:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/coolers/display/atx-psu5_3.html

Quote
Good experiences with modular cabling PSUs?
I have a few that use them (like an Antec NeoPower PS in one of my boxes) but I don't consider them mandatory as I have no problems letting my cabling look like a rat's nest.

Quote
SILENCE is golden, especially with 5 active fans in the case already
Read the reviews in http://silentpcreview.com/ if you want a quiet power supply.

Quote
Brand recommendations? PC Power & Cooling is now owned by OCZ and they don't seem to be making higher end PSUs, at least not the modular type.
Seasonic is still my benchmark though the "enthusiast" power supply market is very crowded these days.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 10, 2009, 09:09:12 AM
I was going to use a Seasonic after talking about this a couple years ago when I built my current computer, but I ended up going with a 610W PCP&C. This feeds my thirsty 8800gtx, but I only have a single 10k hdd.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 10, 2009, 12:11:02 PM
I was looking at the 800 watt Seasonic, and it does indeed seem to be the king of power supplies. Silver rated power management, Active PFC, modular cables, 12 volt high amp rails up the ying yang, silent as a doormouse, etc.

But is it really worth $300 bucks? I mean, sure, it probably merits the sticker price, but am I going overboard?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 10, 2009, 12:39:36 PM
5 hard drives, 4 in raid 5 and you're wondering if a power supply is overboard?  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 10, 2009, 02:30:13 PM
Well, its a gamer box more than a work production box, so ya. That Seasonic is teh serious shtz, if you look at it. There are other ~700 to 800 Watt PSUs for about 100 bucks cheaper from still 'reputable' name brands that would probably never go bad on me, and/or keep silent.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on April 14, 2009, 02:22:37 PM
A little off the build topic, but what would people recommend as a good CSS editor?  I’m been having a balls of a time trying to get freeware editors to work.  I have Dreamweaver, but it might as well be in Arabic.  I need an approachable CSS text editor with a good preview feature.  Thx.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 14, 2009, 02:31:01 PM
Emacs.

More seriously a preview feature is mostly useless unless your site is IE6-only (the IE "rendering engine" is relatively easy to embed in Windows apps). As schild can tell you in great detail, every browser does CSS slightly differently.

Also, what OS are you using?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 14, 2009, 02:39:35 PM
I like to do my CSS editing in firebug, as you can see your changes rendered on the page immediately.

Doesn't Eclipse have a CSS editing plugin too?

The "see your changes in preview" thingy is a bit advanced, so expect it to be clunky in most implementations. Easiest to just edit the CSS file in a good text editor (TextPad on Windows) and save/promote your changes, refresh browser to see changes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on April 14, 2009, 02:46:22 PM
Save and refresh works very well and isn't usually any longer than other methods.

Ctrl-s, alt-tab, F5.

That said, when I was doing a lot of web stuff I found it generally easier to get the page the way I liked it in Firefox/Mozilla and then make IE look right.  Starting with IE as your base can lead you off in directions that work in no other browser.

I worked on state run websites and we had to stay standards compliant and I found that if you try and stay as close to the standards as you can, you may not (probably wont) be able to 100% but making the effort will get rid of a lot of your cross browser compatibility issues.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on April 14, 2009, 03:22:54 PM
I can use Mac or PC.  My copy of Dreamweaver is for Mac.  And yeah I think what I was hoping for was a WYSIWYG editor for only the basic architecture.  Just to get the basic layout, and then finesse everything by text.   Hadn't thought of Eclipse.  Thx.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 15, 2009, 06:45:26 AM
Have you tried textmate on your mac?  DW designer view sucks at CSS so even if you were comfy with it it wouldn't give you the solution you are looking for.  On the other hand DW's built in ftp makes saving local, uploading to web and refreshing your browser as easy as F12.  Personally I think DW is the closest thing out there to becoming the perfect web development tool, unfortunately adobe is clueless so it will never even be a contender.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on April 15, 2009, 11:52:55 AM
"textmate"

thanks very much I will try this.  I know little about the Mac world and for some reason I never encountered textmate in any of my previous searches.  Cheers and thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 15, 2009, 05:01:14 PM
You can put in a (relatively) wimpy one just to test things out. An unloaded CPU and GPU draw much less power so you don't need the full 550 Watts of your current one.

Ok, tried a brand new PSU. Tried turning it on with just the video card and HDD plugged in, after 2 seconds, complete shut down. Tried without the HDD, same thing. Pulled the video card out, same thing. Pulled out the RAM just for kicks, same thing. Tried it when the only thing plugged in was the mobo (it's plugged in in two different places: big ass plug and somewhere near the top left next to a heat sink.

Could it be a fried motherboard?

Specs:
Power Supply: Now a Corsair 650W Power Supply
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6600 (2x 2.4GHz)
Motherboard:  Asus P5N32-E SLI nForce® 680i SLI Chipset
Memory: Corsair XMS2 Xtreme 2x1024mb RAM
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
Sound: Creative Lab Sound Blaster X-Fi
Hard Drive: 250gb SATA-II 7200rpm
CD/DVD Drive ( 16x DVD-ROM Drive)
CD-RW/DVD-RW Drive 18X Dual Format/Double Layer DVD±R/±RW + CD-R/RW)
Intel Pro 10/100/1000 Network Card


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 15, 2009, 05:37:32 PM
You can put in a (relatively) wimpy one just to test things out. An unloaded CPU and GPU draw much less power so you don't need the full 550 Watts of your current one.

Ok, tried a brand new PSU. Tried turning it on with just the video card and HDD plugged in, after 2 seconds, complete shut down. Tried without the HDD, same thing. Pulled the video card out, same thing. Pulled out the RAM just for kicks, same thing. Tried it when the only thing plugged in was the mobo (it's plugged in in two different places: big ass plug and somewhere near the top left next to a heat sink.

Could it be a fried motherboard?
Could be. Is this your own PC/motherboard that can fit your CPU?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 15, 2009, 05:40:14 PM
Hmm, sorry, but I'm not quite sure what you're asking. I am that clueless.  :grin: The computer arrived from iBuyPower all put together already, with those specs. The only thing I did was configure it on the website using their constraints. The only things I've done since is add RAM, go to Vista Ultimate, and now change the power supply.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 15, 2009, 07:10:17 PM
Do you have another computer that's running a Core (2/Quad) CPU?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 15, 2009, 07:44:02 PM
Does sound like it's either the CPU or mobo .. CPUs are pretty darn reliable these days, so my money is on the mobo being fried. But since you'd have to buy a new mobo anyways, might as well get a new CPU to go with it!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 15, 2009, 08:02:16 PM
My friend bought an IBuyPower system a few years ago, against my advice not to. He has crappy problems with his system as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 16, 2009, 05:33:28 AM
Yea, I'm kinda disappointed here. My eight year old Alienware box has been fine as a media server with no problems at all. Both laptops the kids use and abuse have never had anything but a single hard drive failure. Heck, just for kicks I turn on the Mac SE from 1998 and all I ever did there was go to a whopping 2.5mb of RAM from the original 1mb.

I've got another year of labor coverage left on the warranty with iBuyPower so I was thinking of sending it back to them. But then I looked at some of the mobo/CPU combos at Newegg and came across this combo (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.181182) (Intel P45 and Q8200 2.33GHz processor) for what appears to be a pretty attractive price of $284.98. I assume it does not arrive with the processor already on the board. So for a neophyte like me, am I better off:

1. Eating the shipping cost and having iBuyPower do all this for me. I still need to buy the parts from them but at least have (some) confidence they'll be able to install/configure.
2. Buying the mobo/CPU combo and Newegg and taking a crack at it?

Do you have another computer that's running a Core (2/Quad) CPU?
Oh, no. My old one is a Pentium 4.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 16, 2009, 02:42:56 PM
Mwave.com will assemble for you if you don't trust iBuyPower. Installing a CPU with the stock fan is straightforward though you probably will need to pickup some thermal paste and there is some technique involved. Some aftermarket CPU coolers can be a fricking pain in the ass to install.

Personally I think being able to build your own computers is a useful skill for "gaming enthusiasts" and it's really not that hard or dangerous, especially these days (in the old days with AT power supplies and CPUs/MBs without built-in thermal protection cutoffs it didn't take too much effort to fry your CPU or motherboard during install). However I understand people that just want to treat the computers as "black boxes" and don't want to muck around in there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 17, 2009, 07:33:12 AM
Hmm ok thanks Trippy. It all seems pretty straightforward, and for the types of games I'm focusing on these days, it might be a good time to finally take a shot at it. Being able to set CPU chips was about the only thing concerning me. I just know myself and paste  :oh_i_see:. Everything else I've done in some form or another over the years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 17, 2009, 08:11:50 AM
I just took a look at the bundles over at Mwave. Man why I didn't I just go there first. Assuming just dropping the assembled/tested mobo into my case is a simple matter of taking the whole thing apart and plugging in the right stuff from the PSU, I might just go this route.

Right now my (presumably dead) mobo supports SLI. I bought it in case I wanted to go that route, but two years later don't really see a need to. My vidcard seems fine, I have a brand new power supply, and already have the RAM. In NiX's advice thread, you pointed towards ASUS as a good board. So at Mwave, I'm looking at:

  • ASUS P5Q SE intel p45 chipset ATX form factor 1xPCI-E(x16)/2xPCI-E(x1)/3xpci/4xddr2 w/sata2,lan(gb),usb 2.0 & audio (cpu type:intel - socket 775)$97.
  • Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz- $284.

I wanted to try and keep it under $400. I don't really get the differences between all the motherboards. I just wanted a slot for the vidcard, one for the Sound Blaster board, and a third in case I ever want to put in the wifi card (doubtful though). There's four slots for RAM in case I ever do want to go to a 64bit OS to break the 3gb barrier.

Look good?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on April 17, 2009, 12:44:42 PM
Here's one for you guys. I have the following chunk of code:

<iframe src="http://www.homeinsight.com/Widget/default.asp?F1GEILAE2T5V" id="iframeWidget" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="height:380px; width:175px;" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>

It creates a nice little framed widget if I put it on to a webpage. It's a little complex, because it includes fields to fill out, a next page button, etc.

What I would like to do, is find a way to get it in to other things, like an Outlook signature, Craigslist ad, Facebook, that sort of thing.
Any suggestions from web gurus here on how to approach that would be appreciated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 17, 2009, 01:31:02 PM
craigslist only supports a limited number of tags and i doubt iframe is one of them.  You might be able to get it into an outlook sig but my guess is it will trigger the "the following email may contain malicious content" type of flag or at the very least do the click here to download linked content type of thing.

To test on outlook just browse to your signature file in explorer and directly edit the .htm one to include that link.  I would steer clear of trying to add any sort of html to an outlook sig using the built in edit signature functionality (think of creating html using word).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on April 18, 2009, 03:32:00 AM
New GFX card arrived it says minimum PSU requirement is 500w and the one I'm using is a 450w. Is there a risk of permanent damage to anything if I test it out to see if it works before replacing the PSU?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 18, 2009, 03:42:03 AM
  • ASUS P5Q SE intel p45 chipset ATX form factor 1xPCI-E(x16)/2xPCI-E(x1)/3xpci/4xddr2 w/sata2,lan(gb),usb 2.0 & audio (cpu type:intel - socket 775)$97.
  • Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz- $284.

I wanted to try and keep it under $400. I don't really get the differences between all the motherboards. I just wanted a slot for the vidcard, one for the Sound Blaster board, and a third in case I ever want to put in the wifi card (doubtful though). There's four slots for RAM in case I ever do want to go to a 64bit OS to break the 3gb barrier.

Look good?
Sure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 19, 2009, 08:53:30 AM
Just got my new PC up and running (Thanks for that, guys!).

I decided to put Windows 7 on it for now (build 7077 for now). Any ideas for decent freeware anti-virus/spyware that will work on 7?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miguel on April 19, 2009, 09:02:07 AM
New GFX card arrived it says minimum PSU requirement is 500w and the one I'm using is a 450w. Is there a risk of permanent damage to anything if I test it out to see if it works before replacing the PSU?

If your card draws more juice than your power supply can handle, you'll load the voltage rails down and the whole thing becomes flaky.  You'll get BSOD's, freezes, crashes:  you name it.  Other than that I doubt you have anything to worry about.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on April 19, 2009, 10:00:36 AM
I decided to put Windows 7 on it for now (build 7077 for now). Any ideas for decent freeware anti-virus/spyware that will work on 7?
I'm using Avira with the build 7000 x64. Avast! gave me the occasion bsod from interfering network drivers when using network drives. Nod32 (beta) was great, but my beta expired and my sub has run out. Avira does fine, is free, has the daily popup (easily disabled) annoyance. And it's found all the virii in the attachments I've gotten from work  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on April 20, 2009, 08:47:16 AM
What I would like to do, is find a way to get it in to other things, like an Outlook signature, Craigslist ad, Facebook, that sort of thing.
Any suggestions from web gurus here on how to approach that would be appreciated.

When you use an iframe like that you are linking directly to a third party website (in this case you are the third party).  It's not something most websites allow for all kinds of reasons.  Like, oh, you could suddenly decide to link Goatce into the frame, or a pop-up that looks like the hosting website asking for username and password or whatever or an on-load redirect to some other website.

Outlook may allow it but if they do it's because Microsoft has no clue about security because that would be even more exploitable.  Imagine your Grandma opens outlook and clicks on an email from "Your Bank" and in it is a nice alarming account fraud warning notice with a username and password login embedded directly into the email so that she can check on her account safely.

BRILLIANT!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 20, 2009, 10:18:08 AM
outlook allows javascript in your signature block it would not surprise me at all if they allowed an iframe there too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 23, 2009, 02:44:44 PM
So, a wierd memory problem. Here's the set up:

Motherboard is a 939 AMD socket Asus motherboard
CPU is an Athlon 64 San Diego

It supports both dual and single channel memory. It has 2 banks of 2 slots, a total of 4 slots. The memory is meant to be paired so that one stick of ram in one bank is paired with another stick in the other bank in the corresponding slot to provide dual channel memory. Alternately, you can ignore that, and simply put one or two sticks in a single bank to have single channel memory.

The problem is that one of the banks seems to be broken. I can put two or one stick of ram into bank 1 and it runs fine, passing all memory tests I throw at it, in single-channel mode.

If, however, I put in two sticks, one in each bank, the tests fail. Using Windows Memory Test from Ultimate Boot CD, I get LRAND errors, where the memory code written gets garbled (I think its hex code, could be wrong) by one or two entries. For example, if the data sent is 0a1b2c3d the result returned is something slightly off, like 0a1b2f3e (should be c and d in the last set). This is just an example.

I have tested over 4 sticks of ram that pass tests in both other boxes and when just using bank 1 in single channel. The moment I use the 2nd bank, the errors emerge.

Has anyone ever encountered something like this before? I must say I am stumped.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on April 24, 2009, 09:03:44 AM
Is the PS2 Slim region free?

Should I buy a PS2 + old good games or go for a PS3 directly?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 24, 2009, 09:15:01 AM
Is the PS2 Slim region free?

Should I buy a PS2 + old good games or go for a PS3 directly?

I do not think the PS2 Slim is region-free.  Seems like someone would have told me if I did not see it, since that would be the Best Fucking Thing Ever, Almost.

I don't know a lot about the current state PS3 BC in practical terms because I'm using a 60GB.  However, I think the number is something like 80% of all titles.  If I had to decide today, I'd probably get a PS2 if I was intent on continuing my PS2 gaming with seriousness.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on April 24, 2009, 09:27:20 AM
Is the PS2 Slim region free?

Should I buy a PS2 + old good games or go for a PS3 directly?

I do not think the PS2 Slim is region-free.  Seems like someone would have told me if I did not see it, since that would be the Best Fucking Thing Ever, Almost.

I don't know a lot about the current state PS3 BC in practical terms because I'm using a 60GB.  However, I think the number is something like 80% of all titles.  If I had to decide today, I'd probably get a PS2 if I was intent on continuing my PS2 gaming with seriousness.

Cheers!

The new 80gig PS3s aren't BC at all from what I've heard.

I've only owned Xbox and Xbox 360, never any Playstations. I'm selling off my 360 and I can't decide if I want to play games like Persona 4, Ico, Shadow of the Colossus, God Hand, Viewtiful Joe or go straight for PS3. The reason I'd want to buy a PS3 now is so that I still can find Demon's Souls while it's available and relatively easy to find (I don't want to pay 100$ + a couple of years from now).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 26, 2009, 03:19:44 PM
I'm tired of my vid card crashing.  I'll do surgery on it and turn it into a hand-me-down if it works, but if I'm going to go that far I want a new card for when I fail and it gets trashed.

Motherboard is an Abit IP35 Pro with a PCI Express x16 slot.  (One has 4x bandwidth, for what it's worth.)  Is a PCI Express 2.0 card going to work in that slot?  I know it won't be as awesome if so, but restricting myself to non-2.0 cards seems like I can't get anything above a 9xxx series.

I'll take recomendations.  ~$100 +/- $50.  Quiet and cool is good.  My dying one is an ECS with the monster heat sink, and it was great, never getting over 56 C.  I think the 8xxx series problems or general memory failure got to it though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on April 27, 2009, 07:57:47 AM
Is the PS2 Slim region free?

Should I buy a PS2 + old good games or go for a PS3 directly?

Since you've had a 360, unless you have a major affinity for rpg's you ought to get the PS3, see if you can find one of the BC ones used.  That's what I did without too much trouble, cost me $450 but Schild convinced me it was worth it.

***

-I still need a controller that will work for ps3 and vista64.

-Any Dell users have recommendations for replacing a dead default dell keyboard?

-Wireless network cards?  Anyone like a particular brand or card series?




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 27, 2009, 09:02:44 AM
-Wireless network cards?  Anyone like a particular brand or card series?

Perhaps shitty advice, but I've been happy just checking customer ratings on newegg and going for something that looked solid.  I cannot even tell you what brand it was that I installed in my wife's PC that I build just in February, but luckily I was able to download some drivers from the manufacturer that let it work on W7 beta.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 27, 2009, 09:16:03 AM
No one on the vid card?
:sad_red_panda:
-Any Dell users have recommendations for replacing a dead default dell keyboard?
Try Dell (http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/category.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04&category_id=5840&~ck=anav&sort=price).

Alternatively, if you have some small computer shops nearby you might find one there.  I picked up a spare from a stack they had for $10 each.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 27, 2009, 09:26:38 AM
-Wireless network cards?  Anyone like a particular brand or card series?

Perhaps shitty advice, but I've been happy just checking customer ratings on newegg and going for something that looked solid.  I cannot even tell you what brand it was that I installed in my wife's PC that I build just in February, but luckily I was able to download some drivers from the manufacturer that let it work on W7 beta.

In the last decade somehow cell phone audio and wireless setup have regressed.  I use linksys religiously, that said they ain't what they used to be.  Once you are finished installing whatever you end up with you may want to ditch all the vendor grown wifi management and revert to the built in windows stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 27, 2009, 09:51:28 AM
No one on the vid card?
:sad_red_panda:

I was hoping someone would chime in before I re-posted the link to that Tom's article.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/benchmarks,30.html
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/radeon-geforce-gtx,review-31554.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 27, 2009, 10:11:19 AM
I would have chimed in on the vid card issue but I really don't know about the 4x bandwidth issue. I suspect that they are backwards compatible, but that's an entirely unresearched hunch. Word on the street is that the GTX 275 is the price point sweet spot (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-275,2266.html), but other than that..


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on April 27, 2009, 11:57:05 AM
Q3 2008 is a long time ago in video card terms.

The 4850 or a GTS250 would be right in your price range, and a pci-express 2.0 card should work fine in a 1.0 slot. The GTX275 is quite a bit pricier, and the 4870s haven't dropped below $150 (except this one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161268) or this better venting one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102810) with rebate)

That said, the 4870 512m I have runs everything maxxed out at 1920x1200 except Crysis. Which isn't much fun anyway.

Or if you can wait a few weeks, I'll be selling a 9800gtx.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 27, 2009, 12:55:58 PM
I can wait, but if it's used, I'm probably not willing to pay enough to make it worth your while.

As long as the 2.0 cards are compatable with 1.0 slots I'll look into those.  That was my biggest concern.  No point in getting all excited about how awesome a card is if it won't work.

Also I should have qualified:  I'm not interested in a Radeon.  Buyer's remorse, even if it was several generations back.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 27, 2009, 02:33:17 PM
Any ideas as to why I need to periodically hard-reset my Belkin wireless route? By hard-reset, I mean unplug it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 27, 2009, 04:19:41 PM
Belkin is Swahili for "failure"?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 27, 2009, 11:18:52 PM
Belkin is Swahili for "failure"?

I think it's actually an English synonym now too  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jobu on April 29, 2009, 01:12:24 PM
I've always built my own computers for myself and my wife, but my wife's patience for the troubleshooting part of the process is non-existent. She needs a new machine, so I'm probably just going to buy a premade one from somewhere to save her the hassle. The only experience I have with premade computers though are the Dells I have at work. I really like them, they've always been pretty solid and stable. Has anyone had any good experiences with other brands?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 29, 2009, 01:19:47 PM
no


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 29, 2009, 11:03:10 PM
I have decided that self-building is LESS hassle than pre-mades. At least when you build it yourself you know you're not a dribbling idiot and you give a shit if it works or not.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 30, 2009, 05:58:31 AM
My take on it is even if you get a vendor built machine you will want to reinstall the OS to decrapify it and since that is the most time consuming bit you may as well just build your own.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 30, 2009, 06:02:54 AM
The best thing about Dell is that you can point people to their web site and let them buy their own fucking machine.  That is not to be underestimated as a selling-point.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on April 30, 2009, 06:52:40 AM
The problem with a pre-built is you never know exactly what is in the machine and that becomes a big pita down the road when something breaks.  It also is a fucking hassle when you have a hardware issue or you want to upgrade.  My other gripes are that they bundle a shitton of stupid on your machine, they don't give you a real windows disc and the cases that pre-builts use are fucking retarded, they are designed to stop you from getting inside them.  All I know is short term pre-built is nice but if its a machine you want to use 3+ years from now you'll be much happier if you do it yourself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 30, 2009, 08:34:18 AM
The one significant advantage to dell machines is that their CPU cooling is second to none, short of some very serious fiddling with after market heat reduction options. Dells, in my experience, have all had these custom job heat cowls that cover the entire CPU fan/sink and shunt the heat right out of the box.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 30, 2009, 09:46:48 AM
Yeah.  If I wasn't using a monster direct touch pipe cooler I'd want the Dell heat cowl.  Also buy a full-size desktop and Dells are no problem to break into and tinker with.  The space saving models have that trade-off, but then most business users have no, ahem, business fiddling with the internals.

I have decided that self-building is LESS hassle than pre-mades. At least when you build it yourself you know you're not a dribbling idiot and you give a shit if it works or not.
It's still worth it with friends or parental units you don't want to do regular maintenance for.  Format and Forget.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 30, 2009, 10:33:31 AM
Yea, that's only if I'm going to use it myself.  If Uncle Jimmy has a problem with his Dell I told him to buy, I'll have him use the warranty.  If he needs an upgrade, I sent him to dell.com again.  For my own wife, though, I built it from parts and threw a beta OS on there because it will be my headache anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on April 30, 2009, 02:43:39 PM
My friend used his laptop's wireless to get a connection to his 360, will that same method work giving one to my desktop?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 30, 2009, 04:24:57 PM
What are you trying to get onto your 360? Assuming both are on the same router and you've either got Media Center or Vista, it's simply a matter of configuring those to share onto the network and then on the X360 setting up that PC as a source for media content. Last I checked it supports music, movies and photos. I don't know about sharing games, but I suspect not.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on April 30, 2009, 08:05:46 PM
It's still worth it with friends or parental units you don't want to do regular maintenance for.  Format and Forget.
On the software preload point. The amount of time to remove everything and clean it up isn't worth it, not even mentioning how to explain this to a family member. Generally if a friend/co-worker/family needs a PC I offer to "setup" their pc with an nlite/vlite build of their OS/patches/drivers + avg + split partitions (os/data aka user folders) and part image of the running system on the data drive.

This ends up being the same amount of time on building one for them or buying the dell as the disc has to be built, download the latest drivers and system installed/imaged.

So I'm with you, make it idiot proof and save as much time as possible  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 01, 2009, 08:01:38 AM
What are you trying to get onto your 360? Assuming both are on the same router and you've either got Media Center or Vista, it's simply a matter of configuring those to share onto the network and then on the X360 setting up that PC as a source for media content. Last I checked it supports music, movies and photos. I don't know about sharing games, but I suspect not.

It's a weird question and most people assume what you're explaining. I mean, my friend used his laptop as a wireless card for his 360. Laptop would receive a wireless signal, and by plugging his laptop into his 360, the 360 would be able to connect to the internet. Would this same method, plugging my laptop into my desktop instead, net me the same results?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 01, 2009, 10:12:03 AM
Get a real router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on May 01, 2009, 10:20:26 AM
The x-box 360 has an Ethernet port.  It works just like every other computer with an Ethernet port in the entire world.

So, uh, yes you can share your internet connection via the Ethernet port on the XBox 360 IF you have 2 Ethernet cards in your PC.  But what Trippy said is the correct answer.

By a 20 dollar router and plug the PC and XBox into it and the cable modem (or whatever) into it's WAN port.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 01, 2009, 10:26:14 AM
You only need one Ethernet port on the machine that has the Internet connection if it's using something like USB to connect to the "modem". E.g.:

Cable Modem <- USB -> Laptop <- Ethernet -> Xbox 360

or

Cable Modem <- USB -> Laptop <- Ethernet -> Desktop PC


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 01, 2009, 10:36:49 AM
Getting back to NiX's original question, yes in theory you can use Internet Connection Sharing and your laptop that's connecting to a wireless router/bridge to give an Internet connection to an "isolated" desktop PC but that's like backwards since your laptop always has to be on for your desktop PC to have a connection. You are better off moving your wireless router closer to your desktop PC so you can connect it with an Ethernet cable. If for some reason that's not possible you can get a wireless access point with an Ethernet connection and plug in your computer that way or get a wireless card/board for your desktop PC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 01, 2009, 12:22:11 PM
I have a router and it's just a temporary fix until we can figure out if it's possible to run the ethernet cable outside the house because the house is too old to run it inside. Otherwise I'll just buy a card for my desktop.

Thanks for the help.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 01, 2009, 12:36:57 PM
Or you could just run another router and connect them wirelessly? Then wire into the second router from the 360.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 01, 2009, 01:05:11 PM
Would another router pick up a better signal?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 01, 2009, 01:12:11 PM
My thoughts were it would be a more permanent solution. We use a WDS here so we didn't have to run some wires through an old and inimical building, figured it might be a good fit for the same reasons.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 01, 2009, 01:24:06 PM
Doesn't matter if it picks up a better signal. It's the cheaper solution. I'd think a wireless card would be cheaper, not more expensive.

Anyone have any experience with the WRT54G2? I currently have a WRT54G running the wireless signal, figure they would work well together.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on May 02, 2009, 08:20:51 AM
Anyone have any experience with the WRT54G2? I currently have a WRT54G running the wireless signal, figure they would work well together.

Using one right now. I loaded DD-WRT on it and its working great. It's got a faster processor in it but it runs vxworks.

A how-to (http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_WRT54G2) on how to flash it. If you do flash it out of the box it set's up with a max active connections of 512, so set it higher(4096) under Administration -> Management -> IP Filter Settings -> Max Ports

WARNING: It is currently not possible to restore Linksys firmware after DD-WRT has been flashed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on May 02, 2009, 10:26:35 AM
Speaking of which, I'm about to put Gargoyle (http://www.gargoyle-router.com/) on a new WRT54GL1.1, anyone have any experience they want to share?  Apparently I can do it all through web browser, no ssh/telnet 4tw since I haven't used telnet since fuck I dunno back when we were playing games on heat/mplayer/kali?

To add one last point on the pre-built thing, they NEVER partition the fucking drive, which kills me.  Every goddamn prebuilt I end up looking at looks like this:
-constant use by stupid enduser for 2+ years
-this ofc means they have all this precious shit they can't afford to lose!!!
-but the goddamn HD isn't partitioned which means I can't get rid of this bloated fucked up slow Windows install without killing all their shit
-there is NO windows cd, just some recovery disc, system restore, here have a facefull of stupid software you don't want bullshit

That experience has repeated itself enough times and with enough different people that I'm firmly in the fuck pre-built machines for life camp.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 02, 2009, 10:43:24 AM
So, I'll be installing W7RC. I have 4 partitions on 1 drive. If I format the Windows partition, it shouldn't touch the others, right?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on May 02, 2009, 11:59:49 AM
Is it possible to play “some” PlayStation 2 games on a new 80-gig PlayStation 3? I got that impression after looking at Sony’s capability website (http://www.us.playstation.com/Support/CompatibleStatus) (the right option "Model CECHE01").


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on May 02, 2009, 04:50:08 PM
So, I'll be installing W7RC. I have 4 partitions on 1 drive. If I format the Windows partition, it shouldn't touch the others, right?

"Shouldn't". It is beta, but I don't expect it would touch the other partitions without you asking it too - but it may mess with your boot sector.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 02, 2009, 08:20:41 PM
That experience has repeated itself enough times and with enough different people that I'm firmly in the fuck pre-built machines for life camp.
Once again, why I format when the machine arrives.  I can set it up how I want and without all the crap.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 04, 2009, 06:44:09 AM
So, I'll be installing W7RC. I have 4 partitions on 1 drive. If I format the Windows partition, it shouldn't touch the others, right?

The W7 beta did not fuck with my second partition on install, so I'd love to expect the RC would also be as kind.  I still might unplug my other disks, though.

Is it possible to play “some” PlayStation 2 games on a new 80-gig PlayStation 3? I got that impression after looking at Sony’s capability website (http://www.us.playstation.com/Support/CompatibleStatus) (the right option "Model CECHE01").

Sure, it is entirely possible and I keep hearing it's 80% of the PS2 library that works.  The only issue is that the 80GB must do software emulation, while ye olde 60/20GB contained actual PS2 chips.  As such, emulation could cause problems with certain titles.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on May 04, 2009, 06:49:16 AM
So, wait, even the PS-3's that don't claim to be backward compatible actually are, at least partially, backward compatible through emulation?

I just looked up Persona 3 on that link above and it said it runs fine on the 80 GB model.

They might want to clear that aspect up a bit in their literature.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 04, 2009, 06:52:56 AM
So, wait, even the PS-3's that don't claim to be backward compatible actually are, at least partially, backward compatible through emulation?
No. They aren't. There was a transition period where a few shipments over the course of a few months of 80GB had software emulation. It should say it on the box and in the manual for those releases. Post the 80GB, they do not have software emulation.

The software emulation is mostly crap anyway.

Edit: Also, you've got some errant hyphenation going on there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 04, 2009, 06:55:00 AM
Since I have a 60GB, I haven't paid much attention to it.  I think Sony changed their minds at some point and would like for you to buy a PS2 Slim.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 06, 2009, 03:09:54 PM
I'm using the WMP54G wireless card. Whenever I play online games (Steam, StarCraft so far) I get lots of choke in bursts. It's not severe and only happens so often, but it's a known problem. I tried to find a fix and only came up with gaming sites with FPS junkies whining. Is there anything I can do to fix it or should I suck it up and deal with it? My router is a WRT54G running at 54MBPS, signal strength is excellent and I'm the only person on the network.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 06, 2009, 08:14:35 PM
Get wired?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 05:17:58 AM
I need to adjust some partitions on a live Windows machine and I don't want to spend a lot (any) money.  halp?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 07, 2009, 05:20:06 AM
I need to adjust some partitions on a live Windows machine and I don't want to spend a lot (any) money.  halp?

Don't install Windows 7?

I mean, I know there isn't a single REAL reason you're doing it. Feeling left out isn't a reason, sah.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 05:22:24 AM
The reason is I want to stop using W7 beta (since it has some issues) without going back to XP.  I don't want to go back to XP because its 64-bit implementation might as well not exist.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 07, 2009, 05:24:43 AM
The reason is I want to stop using W7 beta (since it has some issues) without going back to XP.  I don't want to go back to XP because its 64-bit implementation might as well not exist.

Wow. That's a lot of OS tinkering on one drive. Uhmmmmmmmmmmmmm, back up all the important stuff and do a full format is the best option. You could repartition but that's not particularly safe, is it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 05:39:11 AM
You could repartition but that's not particularly safe, is it?

No, not safe at all but you can't live your life in fear.  All of the important stuff is not on C:, so as long as I don't dick up the other partition on that disk, I'll be fine.

If there isn't a decent repartition option, I'll just format and do a clean install.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 07, 2009, 07:03:23 AM
You could repartition but that's not particularly safe, is it?

No, not safe at all but you can't live your life in fear.  All of the important stuff is not on C:, so as long as I don't dick up the other partition on that disk, I'll be fine.

If there isn't a decent repartition option, I'll just format and do a clean install.

Do you have another large drive to temporarily hold stuff?  If you have a copy of ghost you could ghost each of your partitions, then wipe the original drive and partition it the way you wanted and ghost back to the newly resized partitions.  Or you could just find a copy of partition magic.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 07, 2009, 07:06:05 AM
I believe that the latest OpenSUSE will let you resize windows partitions during the installation phase, so that may be a work around. You'd have to install Linux, of course, but I think after that you could nuke the Linux partitions, the lilo/grub sector and finally, wipe the MBR and as long as your windows partition is the primary active, you can just use the installation disk to repair the boot sector to boot from Windows again. I am not sure there's a free product to do this otherwise. If you were willing to spend $70, I'd suggest Partition Magic from Symantec (daylight robbery, I know).

I also like Salamok's solution. More time intensive, but pretty guaranteed to work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 07:20:56 AM
I am somehow low on contiguous free space, but the idea of repartitioning that disk is appealing.  Or just doing a clean install.  I'll have to think about it.

I actually do have a copy of ghost from 1997.  I'm sort of afraid to use it. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 07, 2009, 08:01:25 AM
Hmm, did they even have ghost for NTFS back then? Weren't we still all in fat32 land unless we were using Windows NT?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 08:39:17 AM
The GHOST.DOC refers to NTFS so yes... however, I'm still a tad wary of using it.

I had an idea while staring at my disk config.  I have a 70GB disk in here which is less than half full, so I moved all that junk to one of the larger disks and will format it and install on there.  After that I might see about trying a multiboot since I'll still have a 20GB partition laying around.

EDIT: my ghost version = Version 3.1d (8-28-97)  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 07, 2009, 08:42:42 AM
I need to adjust some partitions on a live Windows machine and I don't want to spend a lot (any) money.  halp?
http://www.hiren.info/pages/bootcd ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 08:45:46 AM
I need to adjust some partitions on a live Windows machine and I don't want to spend a lot (any) money.  halp?
http://www.hiren.info/pages/bootcd ?

Good suggestion but I was hoping to avoid a lot of work... although that might not be too much bother.  I think the easiest solution is the one I mentioned previously.  Fingers crossed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 07, 2009, 08:46:30 AM
$50 hard drive is the easiest solution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 07, 2009, 08:58:35 AM
I can now confirm that OpenSUSE 11 does indeed do a nice resizing of Windows 7 partitions. I just shrunk my Win7 partition from 130gb to 80 without a hickup.


Downside is that you end up with a SUSE os installted, and if you don't want that, you'll have to nuke the linux partitions, and wherever you installed grub to. The Win7 CD should come with the boot sector repair tool that vista comes with. That will pretty much re-write the Master Boot Record and you're in business.

On a C2D 6400 with 1 gig of ram it took all of 20 minutes to do.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 07, 2009, 11:57:23 AM
Hmm, did they even have ghost for NTFS back then? Weren't we still all in fat32 land unless we were using Windows NT?

yip there is a switch to get it to work with NTFS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 07, 2009, 08:37:23 PM
$50 hard drive is the easiest solution.

Using the 70GB disk already sitting in my machine was the easiest.  Of course, it's also the most ancient of all my disks...

The disk manager in W7 does a little partition stuff.  There's an option to grown and shrink partitions, unfortunately it only let me shrink the one I wanted by 89MB.  I was able to extend the partition which previously lived on my 70GB disk into the 4GB empty space (that 4GB hole was where Windows lived in Ye Olde Days) but it ended up being a "dynamic" partition; this confused and frightened me, because I'm just an unfrozen caveman computer nerd, so I just deleted it and made a new one.

As long as I don't find anything weird, I'll eventually remove the OS on the 20GB partition and maybe put something else in there... Ubuntu?  Porn?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 11, 2009, 02:25:55 PM
Hurr, really weird and gut-wrenching problem with the PC.

Was watching a video, and just let the pc sit there when it finished. System appeared to go into standby (which it had done before, in a normal fashion), monitor is power-save mode and all. I click tthe mouse to bring the system back up, and....nothing. Tried again, and hit a few random keys, but to no avail. Then both of my USB peripherals go dead. System is now entirely unresponsive. When powering up, all the fans come on, and the mobo power indicator light is green, but the system does not even POST, and send no signal to the monitor. :uhrr:

....HALP?

Intel Q9950
XFX GeForce GTX 260
ASUS P5QL PRO LGA 775 Intel P43 ATX Intel Motherboard
CORSAIR CMPSU-650TX 650W ATX12V / EPS12V PSU
LITE-ON 22X DVD±R DVD Burner with LightScribe Black E-IDE/ATAPI
Western Digital Caviar GP WD7500AACS 750GB 5400 to 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Hard Drive
CORSAIR XMS2 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1066 (PC2 8500) RAM

Gonna try disconnecting some of the components one at a time, trying only 1 stick of RAM, etc, but somehow I think I might have something worse....at least I don't see any evidence that a capacitor has blown.
 

EDIT: I tried clearing BIOS, and my mobo was nice enough to allow me back into BIOS and offer to let me do recovery. I'm currently just letting the system idle on the hardware monitor, where the CPU is idling at about 36.5c while laying on its side with the side panel/fan off (somewhat above room temp - it's warm here, even moreso in my room). Haven't tried going back into W7. Any idea what may have caused the problem, and/or how i could prevent it from reoccuring?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 11, 2009, 03:17:01 PM
I'd peel off the heat sink and check the thermal paste pattern (try not to smear it too much when pulling it off) to see if it was mated well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 11, 2009, 03:27:37 PM
Man, that stupid stock cooler was a huge bitch to get on in the first place; I was afraid of cracking the mobo or something.

Is it possible to just stick it back on after removing it for a short time?

Hell, I'm half-tempted to just buy a new cooler if I need to peel this one off at all; are others, such as Zalmans, easier to install? The stock Intel push-bolt things are....unwieldy.


If it's a heat issue, really odd that it would choose to pop up this far after the initial assembly of the system, and when the system was not even under load.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 11, 2009, 03:35:46 PM
The likely culprits are the power supply and the CPU shutting itself down (either cause it's not mated well to the heat sink or the heat sink fan stopped spinning). I agree it would be odd for the CPU to shut down if it was just "idle". The problem is, it's (sort of) working now, so it's kind of hard to check that the power supply is "working".

I don't know about installing Zalmans in Intel sockets but on AMD their heat sinks usually are the back brace/screw in kind, which I prefer greatly over any sort of "tension"-style clips/pushpins, even though that often means taking out the motherboard to fiddle with the heat sink (if the back brace has some padded sticky tape on it, sometimes you can readjust the heat sink without taking the motherboard out).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on May 11, 2009, 03:57:40 PM
Aftermarket coolers are usually the hardest part of any build I've been involved in but I usually go for the biggest thing I can get my hands on.  I'd guess the problem is with the mobo, start there and see if you can get it to post again.  I had my current machine go into sleep mode on accident (fuck you btw vista) and it wouldn't come out and I ended up in a very similar situation.  Clearing the CMOS was the fix.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 11, 2009, 04:03:45 PM
Appears to have been the problem here, as I'm posting from my normal PC again. I'll probably do a few reboots this evening, just to jump into BIOS and check temps. From RTFM, I had gone into S3 (suspend to RAM) sleep mode. Not the first time my PC had gone into that deep sleep, but now I'm just going to force it to only use S1 (power on suspend) mode, which I'm going to guess is the "classic" sleep mode.

Total aside, but any suggestions for Heat Sinks/Fans for a Q9550? Really have no good idea who is reputable at this point. Note: Don't need big and monstrous, just something that might be on the smaller side but gets the job done. I do not OC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 11, 2009, 06:16:17 PM
I love my Xigmatek 1283.  It's way more heatsink than I need considering I don't overclock and have a Q9300, but until I fiddled with the motherboard the other day it was keeping my CPU cold.  I'm just waiting for my brackets to arrive so I can reseat it, since I am not fiddling with those damn clips again.  Worst design I've seen yet.

Even though you probably don't need a cooler that big, they're not much more than a cheap fan, and I figure with how cool they keep things it'll more than make up the cost difference of replacement by not stressing my CPU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 12, 2009, 11:33:03 AM
COD4 doesn't work in 64 bit operating systems. Dual boot 32 bit XP or 7? Or would the Virtual XP work?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 12, 2009, 11:35:23 AM
Depends if they have full 3d functionality within the virtual windows. I suspect that it don't. Also, CoD4 doesn't work at all in 64 bit, even in emulation mode? That totally BLOWS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 12, 2009, 11:42:24 AM
Virtual XP is out. Friend tried and it doesn't have the power.

CoD4 works, but not the multiplayer. PunkBuster has issues with 64 bit operating systems, something about an API error and they refuse to fix it. Even though it happens to people with Vista/XP 64 too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 13, 2009, 07:28:20 AM
CD standard is case-insensitive, but what about DVD?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on May 14, 2009, 05:45:03 PM
Virtual XP is out. Friend tried and it doesn't have the power.

CoD4 works, but not the multiplayer. PunkBuster has issues with 64 bit operating systems, something about an API error and they refuse to fix it. Even though it happens to people with Vista/XP 64 too.

Sure it does; here's what you do.
 -Install COD4
 -Download punk buster http://websec.evenbalance.com/downloader/download.php?file=1
 -Run the PBsetup.exe; and select "Add game" and choose COD4
 -It should find your install directory. Then select the COD install and "Check for update".
 -Browse to your COD4 install and the PB directory, mine for example is "C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\call of duty 4\PB"
 -Run the pbsvc.exe to install the service on your PC so the game can check your pc.

This has worked fine for me on Vista 64, and I just tested it on Windows7 fine (kept getting punkbuster communication errors till I installed the service correctly).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on May 14, 2009, 07:44:04 PM
So my network at home has been randomly dropping packets and taking 5+ minutes to load pages the last 2 days.  Time Warner tech support says it's my router dying and not their problem (thanks guys) but when I plug directly into the cable modem from a different computer it randomly does the same thing, just not as much.  Some pages take 5+ minutes to load, others come right up, others can't even be found.  I did a tracert and ping to various problem sites, none of which indicate any issues (with the occasional 3200ms in a random step of the way).  Is there a possibility that some router somewhere is taking a shit and no one wants to admit it or is my ancient Linksys switch and\or cable modem router finally biting it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on May 14, 2009, 08:06:18 PM
So my network at home has been randomly dropping packets and taking 5+ minutes to load pages the last 2 days.  Time Warner tech support says it's my router dying and not their problem (thanks guys) but when I plug directly into the cable modem from a different computer it randomly does the same thing, just not as much.  Some pages take 5+ minutes to load, others come right up, others can't even be found.  I did a tracert and ping to various problem sites, none of which indicate any issues (with the occasional 3200ms in a random step of the way).  Is there a possibility that some router somewhere is taking a shit and no one wants to admit it or is my ancient Linksys switch and\or cable modem router finally biting it?

You need a better data sample, a traceroute will only show you the conditions of the exact moment of the trace. Monitor the connection for a few hours with mtr (http://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/) for unix/windows/mac, or 3d Traceroute (http://www.d3tr.de/) for windows. Set it up to trace two sites, say a google address and an known internal ISP connection (say your ISP's mail server).

This should help you on the way to find the issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 14, 2009, 08:47:19 PM
So my network at home has been randomly dropping packets and taking 5+ minutes to load pages the last 2 days.  Time Warner tech support says it's my router dying and not their problem (thanks guys) but when I plug directly into the cable modem from a different computer it randomly does the same thing, just not as much.  Some pages take 5+ minutes to load, others come right up, others can't even be found.  I did a tracert and ping to various problem sites, none of which indicate any issues (with the occasional 3200ms in a random step of the way).  Is there a possibility that some router somewhere is taking a shit and no one wants to admit it or is my ancient Linksys switch and\or cable modem router finally biting it?

I had a recent issue like this as well.  TWC sent someone out and they spotted a damaged cable incoming to the house, a bad splitter inside the house, a bad cable modem and my router being bad.  My theory is their bad shit screwed up my router, tell them you bypassed the router and the problem persisted then make them come test everything prior to letting them blow your router again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on May 14, 2009, 09:12:50 PM
Well the other half did a quick test tonight with a computer plugged directly into the router for hours and it never gave a problem and when switched back it stopped working.  Sounds like either the router or the network switch has problems.  I've used Linksys stuff for years and rarely had problems for almost 10 years on the first set of hardware, but this will be the 2nd switch or router in the last 2 years I've had to replace.  Did they lose their secret formula for making good product or did I just run into bad luck?  I guess the question should be "do Linksys products suck now or should I just replace it and not worry about it?"

All of course naturally assuming that TWC didn't cause my router to give up the ghost - we had an extremely weak signal that got worse over time.  I replaced the ancient rusty cables with higher quality ones and we put an amplifier on the input to the cable modem a while back and the problems disappeared (after TWC phone support told me it was a dead cable modem and go buy a new one).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 14, 2009, 09:35:52 PM
How clean is your power? Do you use a UPS for the router?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on May 15, 2009, 06:56:29 AM
Power's not too bad - haven't checked it in a few years but it was within the +/- 10% we used to design our power supplies to.

Don't use a UPS, just a simple surge protector.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 15, 2009, 07:15:23 AM
You see where I'm going, tho, right? A lynksys router that's worked just fine for years starts to fail. You replace it, and the next one fails. There's two possibilities; Lynksys has been shipping out failing routers for the last two years, or some external factor is hosing them.

Another thing just occured to me; the cabling to the router. It seems unlikely, but a failing wire on a cable may be sending odd low voltage fluctuations that are hosing the routers over time. I've seen individual ports on a switch get hosed by decrepid cabling so I guess it could be something like that. I'd check to make sure the cat5 you are using looks in good shape, without any serious kinks in it. Replace them. Also, you may consider your machine's nic card, and try using another.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on May 15, 2009, 07:48:33 AM
I see where you're going all right.  It's interesting to think about, some of the computers on the switch date back 10 years while a few more are newer.  Naturally I'll be going through the cabling when I change it all out today.

I was more concerned that Linksys had pulled a "cost reduction" effort and was shipping cheaper quality product at the same price as before that had a less impressive lifetime than it did.  I've known plenty of other companies that do that and it is frustrating.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 15, 2009, 08:06:34 AM
I need to mount a filesystem in a case-insensitive fashion for Great Justice.  AIX is blueballing me.  I need options.  Be creative.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 15, 2009, 08:13:37 AM
What kind of issues arise if I use Ghost to image multiple computers? Office with VLK, OS key would be OEM Dell.

For the macs I just use Bombich's stuff and it's easy as fucking pie. Ghost (or rather XP/Office licensing) doesn't seem easy as pie. I like pie.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 15, 2009, 08:14:18 AM
I see where you're going all right.  It's interesting to think about, some of the computers on the switch date back 10 years while a few more are newer.  Naturally I'll be going through the cabling when I change it all out today.

I was more concerned that Linksys had pulled a "cost reduction" effort and was shipping cheaper quality product at the same price as before that had a less impressive lifetime than it did.  I've known plenty of other companies that do that and it is frustrating.

They are not what they used to be.  For some reason ever since the cisco merge they have not been as stable.

How clean is your power? Do you use a UPS for the router?
Doesn't the AC adapter offer protection from all but the worst power situations?

I need to mount a filesystem in a case-insensitive fashion for Great Justice.  AIX is blueballing me.  I need options.  Be creative.
So you are mounting a case insensitive volume (like on a windows box) from the AIX OS which is case sensitive?  You could try renaming all of the files within the volume you are mounting to lower case, the case insensitive host OS shouldn't see the difference.  Other than that i do not know of any tool that will interpret this on the fly for you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 15, 2009, 08:19:23 AM
What kind of issues arise if I use Ghost to image multiple computers? Office with VLK, OS key would be OEM Dell.

For the macs I just use Bombich's stuff and it's easy as fucking pie. Ghost (or rather XP/Office licensing) doesn't seem easy as pie. I like pie.
Configure the machine how you want it, then use sysprep to reseal it back to a preinstallation state, then create your master ghost image. 

Edit: I have only used sysprep on XP and according to this thread it is a bit different on Vista either way this looks to be a helpful thread on sysprep (http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=195)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 15, 2009, 08:49:00 AM
Cool, the sysprep was the thing I was missing. Thanks!

Still easier on Macs :P


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 15, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
I need to mount a filesystem in a case-insensitive fashion for Great Justice.  AIX is blueballing me.  I need options.  Be creative.
Umm...does AIX support HFS+? Otherwise, Linux can mount a JFS file system as case insensitive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 15, 2009, 09:14:23 AM
I need to mount a filesystem in a case-insensitive fashion for Great Justice.  AIX is blueballing me.  I need options.  Be creative.
Umm...does AIX support HFS+?

Not so much.  It's not one of the supported types you can create.  These options exist for a cdrfs, however I'm not interested in somehow attaching 100 optical drives.  I'm looking at cifs as a fs type to create, which brings its own headaches.

The mount command has options nocase and upcase but I have confirmed these only work on cdrfs.

Otherwise, Linux can mount a JFS file system as case insensitive.

I've set the local linux hounds on this.  Hopefully they are as smart as you are, otherwise I'll have to *SIGH* learn some linux.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 15, 2009, 09:51:32 AM
Sure it does; here's what you do.
 -Install COD4
 -Download punk buster http://websec.evenbalance.com/downloader/download.php?file=1
 -Run the PBsetup.exe; and select "Add game" and choose COD4
 -It should find your install directory. Then select the COD install and "Check for update".
 -Browse to your COD4 install and the PB directory, mine for example is "C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\call of duty 4\PB"
 -Run the pbsvc.exe to install the service on your PC so the game can check your pc.

This has worked fine for me on Vista 64, and I just tested it on Windows7 fine (kept getting punkbuster communication errors till I installed the service correctly).

They weren't communication errors, they were API errors. Different kind of monster there. I had both services running and even changed their privilege level trying to correct it. Until that server side patch went out, it just wouldn't work. Same went for a lot of people.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 15, 2009, 10:00:29 AM
Just for those playing Yegolev: The Home Game, this is the linuxy way to do the ISO mount:

Code:
mount -o loop -i iso9660 image.iso /cdimage

Fancy!  AIX requires dd'ing the ISO into an empty lv and assorted other nastiness.  After that I don't know if it will end up being case-insensitive anyway.  I have a hard time believing that we are the first shop to run into this, but then maybe other shops have money for a real jukebox.  After this fiasco, we might get it.  Or get outsourced.

Pretending for a minute that I wanted to do this, I'd want this to be nfs'ed out to an AIX machine and end up case-insensitive.  Really, though, I'd like to have this work without the ISO.  Firstly, I end up with one fs per ISO which is "unwieldy", and secondly I have to rip all those fucking ISOs and then scp them somewhere.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 15, 2009, 02:23:34 PM

What kind of issues arise if I use Ghost to image multiple computers? Office with VLK, OS key would be OEM Dell.

For the macs I just use Bombich's stuff and it's easy as fucking pie. Ghost (or rather XP/Office licensing) doesn't seem easy as pie. I like pie.

er, well, uhm, you sorta can't, I don't think. the OS key needs to be a volume license key to survive the multiple ghostings. The moment Windows detects a hardware change, or is forced to due to sysprep, its gonna see about that key and if its locked to the original hardware. It won't be, so either it'll hang at sysprep or at first boot (I forget which) on every machine cept the original one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 15, 2009, 02:48:12 PM

What kind of issues arise if I use Ghost to image multiple computers? Office with VLK, OS key would be OEM Dell.

For the macs I just use Bombich's stuff and it's easy as fucking pie. Ghost (or rather XP/Office licensing) doesn't seem easy as pie. I like pie.

er, well, uhm, you sorta can't, I don't think. the OS key needs to be a volume license key to survive the multiple ghostings. The moment Windows detects a hardware change, or is forced to due to sysprep, its gonna see about that key and if its locked to the original hardware. It won't be, so either it'll hang at sysprep or at first boot (I forget which) on every machine cept the original one.

you can use sysprep to strip out the OS key and it will ask you for it on 1st boot up.  Works great with Dells where the OS is on a Dell volume license key and is already stickered right onto the box.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 15, 2009, 02:55:45 PM
Samba on AIX.  Who knew?  That is all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on May 15, 2009, 09:52:23 PM
Doesn't the AC adapter offer protection from all but the worst power situations?
The big answer is "it depends."  Some modules use large transformers and extensive circuitry to regulate the output, others use a few capacitors and a barely passable regulator.

Turns out the issue was with the router.  Bought a new one for $59.99 and had it back up and running in no time.  I thought it surely couldn't be it, since I was using it extensively the other day to check configurations out, but it was dropping pages left and right and moving between responsive and unresponsive quite regularly when I checked it tonight.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 16, 2009, 12:36:49 PM
Alright, so I need to figure out how to share an internet connection using a USB wireless adapter. I've heard there are USB routers (tiny little things), but haven't been able to find one. Anyway, I have a computer beside the router, which isn't mine, and mine is upstairs. I can't afford to buy another router, but I can get my hands on a USB wireless adapter and I've heard it's possible to make it capable of sharing an internet connection. Anyone know how?

Edit: I've been trying to setup an ad-hoc network, but I can't seem to get Windows 7 to connect to the XP machines ad-hoc wireless network. Any ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 16, 2009, 05:38:14 PM
I imagine that its the same process you would use on a regular wireless adapter, or any network card. There's a little windows wizard thingie to set it up. Haven't done it in a while, tho.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 17, 2009, 08:33:27 AM
I'm suspicious that it's more to do with the W7-vs-XP situation since I had something very similar when I first put W7 beta on my wife's machine.  It has a wireless PCI and was able to connect to the router but filesharing to my XP Pro rig simply did not work.  Not that this helps you any.

I'm pretty sure the USB NIC is like other NICs except slower, never used one myself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on May 18, 2009, 06:12:16 AM
They weren't communication errors, they were API errors. Different kind of monster there. I had both services running and even changed their privilege level trying to correct it. Until that server side patch went out, it just wouldn't work. Same went for a lot of people.

That's really weird because I have played it online for months with no issues same for a friend. the only problem was the install setup puckered on both of ours (steam delivered).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Pagz on May 18, 2009, 05:35:28 PM
If I'm looking to buy a second hand 40GB PS3, what price range should I be looking at before its a ripoff?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on May 21, 2009, 03:27:05 AM
If I'm looking to buy a second hand 40GB PS3, what price range should I be looking at before its a ripoff?

Why a 40 gig? They aren't backwards compatible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Pagz on May 22, 2009, 01:58:18 AM
If I'm looking to buy a second hand 40GB PS3, what price range should I be looking at before its a ripoff?

Why a 40 gig? They aren't backwards compatible.
Well I mean, it doesn't have to be a 40 gig, I just thought they'd be the least expensive? It doesn't matter if its not backwards compatible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on May 22, 2009, 02:17:25 AM
A very quick look on eBay seems to indicate that used PS3 prices approach new prices... or at least get very close. I'd say you're unlikely to save much unless you find a really good deal on Craigslist or something. Maybe look at a new one and see if those are outside your budget, at least you'd get a warranty then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 22, 2009, 12:18:31 PM
Goddamned iBuyPower. Throw me on the list of haters. First I get the computer back with a broken liquid cooler. Then instead of replacing it they instead install CPU fan. This after going to a new mobo and to quad core at 2.83ghz. And after explaining I don't have my computer in a freakin' temperature controlled server room so ambient can get to 75 degrees easily.

So now while I have a computer that at least doesn't shut off within seconds of boot up, it's the CPU seem to be running hot.

Which leads to this question: what's the safe operating range temperates for CPUs? GPUs? Motherboard? I have SpeedFan but the computer is off atm while I let the crappi window AC try it's luck with the room temp.

Edit: Ok, at computer now

  • GPU: 167deg F. Based on info online, this seems within range.
  • Cores: all between 126F and 133F. Again, seems ok.

I do only have two three fans running: CPU, on the nVidia card, going out the back cabinet. Since they didn't put in liquid cooling, I'm thinking of adding a big ass fan in the front for intake.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 22, 2009, 01:47:36 PM
75F ambient temp? That's nothing; my room gets into the 90s.

133F = ~56c, which I would think is within safe operating parameters for the CPU. Is this under full load?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 22, 2009, 02:04:35 PM
Thanks. No, not under full full load. Didn't want to throw ChampO or Godfather 2 at it yet until I heard back from ya all on operating temp.

Do you have just fans on your computer? And do you have an intake fan on the front?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 22, 2009, 02:13:17 PM
Man. You make buying a computer sound scary.

It's actually fairly impressive.

My opinion? Throw everything and the kitchen sink at it and stop worrying about the fucking temperature. If shit doesn't work than shit doesn't what. What you're doing now is best classified as "unnecessary wankery."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 22, 2009, 02:18:05 PM
If you'd been out of a computer for five weeks under the misguided assumption that having the original assembler fixing it would be efficient, you'd feel the same way. If I could do the last fucking month over again I'd just have ripped the goddamned thing apart myself and learned the last bits of what I should have learned long ago anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 22, 2009, 02:19:35 PM
If you'd been out of a computer for five weeks under the misguided assumption that having the original assembler fixing it would be efficient, you'd feel the same way. If I could do the last fucking month over again I'd just have ripped the goddamned thing apart myself and learned the last bits of what I should have learned long ago anyway.
If I'd been out of a computer 1 week, I'd have told them to bugger off, wandered over to Fry's or Best Buy or wherever and just bought one. 5 weeks is hilariously long. Too long, in fact. >_>


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 22, 2009, 02:28:16 PM
A good half of it was just shipping it. But yea, if I ever need another gaming computer, I'm building it myself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on May 22, 2009, 03:13:03 PM
75c idle is high for a gpu, and 55c idle seems high for the cores. I'd see how the airflow seems, if both the graphics fan and case fan are exhausting, are they moving enough air you can feel it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 22, 2009, 03:39:38 PM
75c idle is high for a gpu, and 55c idle seems high for the cores. I'd see how the airflow seems, if both the graphics fan and case fan are exhausting, are they moving enough air you can feel it?
I agree those temps seem too high for just idling on the Windows desktop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 22, 2009, 04:12:31 PM
Agreed.

Thanks. No, not under full full load. Didn't want to throw ChampO or Godfather 2 at it yet until I heard back from ya all on operating temp.

Do you have just fans on your computer? And do you have an intake fan on the front?

Yes. I have 2 front intakes, 1 side intake, 1 rear and 1 top exhaust. Except for 1 hiccup related to sleep modes, my rig has been unbelievable solid.

And I don't really get AC in my room.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 22, 2009, 04:42:07 PM
Just got back with some fans. There's air coming out of the two exhausts (one side, one back), but it's not like on my older computer. But then, there's a reason people ran for cover when I turned that beast on.

In any case, thanks for the update. I'll see what a better airflow does.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 23, 2009, 07:27:07 AM
If the CPU is still running hot, it might be time to redo the paste.  It's possible they put so much on it's acting as an insulator rather than aiding in heat transfer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 23, 2009, 07:30:47 AM
Yeah, what Lanty said. Also, what type of cpu cooler did they put on it? Just the standard one that comes with your CPU?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 23, 2009, 07:46:15 AM
I'll be flipping pissed if they did what you said Lantyssa. But I'm sorta doubting that atm. They replaced the CoolerMaster liquid cooler with a CPU fan. I've since added the mentioned intake and a separate GPU fan. Cheap tests those. After a few hours of ChampO, I got a hard lock, but I think it might have been the game rather than an overheating anything. While the temperature was high under full load, it wasn't exhibiting any of the sort of usual behavior I've seen.

Right now I have two 80mm intakes and one 120mm exhaust. I'll see how it goes for the next few days. I'd really rather have liquid cooling just because for the first two years I never ever had overheating issues and that's when I was in an even worse environment. But if I go that route, I'll do it myself. I'm done with chuckleheads.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 23, 2009, 01:49:54 PM
If you're not overclocking, I cannot imagine why you'd need liquid cooling.

Just get some decent Arctic Silver and make sure the HSF and CPU are mated correctly. I use the HSF that came in the retail box for my Q9550,and I have no problems.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 25, 2009, 04:03:36 AM
Ok. What about the GPU though? That's still rated as "hot" at 145F.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 25, 2009, 04:20:57 AM
If the GPU idle temp has dropped from 167F to 145F that's better but depending on your GPU (which you haven't told us what you have yet so we've been guessing what "normal" temperatures mean in your case) that still may be high. In comparison my 7800 GT with an aftermarket cooler (the stock fan was too noisy for my tastes) idles at 50C (122F).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 25, 2009, 04:40:48 AM
Ah yea, forgot to post that: 8800GTS w/640mb of RAM.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 25, 2009, 04:45:27 AM
63C idle should be okay then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 25, 2009, 04:46:46 AM
Ok cool thanks.

I gotta learn me my celcius :-)

Edit: what's a good stress test app that'll show stats and whatnot?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 26, 2009, 06:02:47 AM
Ok, related question. I tried looking up airflow articles at Toms, but they're talking to experts in a language I'm just learning (good learning on diminishing returns with fans though). So I'll ask here.

120mm fan exhaust halfway up the back.
80mm fan intake halfway up the side (basically blows right onto the video card)
120mm fan intake in the bottom of the front (arriving Thursday, I only have an 80mm in there now).
VGA Cooling Fan (cheap bet).

Two questions:

1) How much does fan speed matter? I found a cheap 80mm that goes above 2000rpm to replace the one on the side that only goes to 1200rpm, but I wasn't sure so figured I'd ask.
2) Do I need another exhaust in the top of the case or will the one 120mm in the back do it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on May 26, 2009, 06:07:52 AM
So I think I'm going to buy a new video card on my way home from work today, and wanted some feedback. Here are the options I'm looking at:

EVGA GeForce GTX 275 633MHZ 896MB 2.26GHZ DDR3 PCI-E Dual DVI-I HDTV Out Video Card        $278.88 (all prices CDN)
XFX Radeon HD 4890 XT 1GB 875MHZ 1GB 3.9GHZ GDDR5 PCI-E 2XDVI HDTV Video Card               $279.00 (after $20 mail in)
EVGA E-GEFORCE 9800GT 55NM 600MHZ 512MB 1.8GHZ 256BIT GDDR3 Dual DVI-I HDCP HDTV       $119.00 (after $20 mail in)
EVGA E-GEFORCE GTX 260 Core 216 55NM 576MHZ 896MB 1.998GHZ GDDR3 PCI-E 2XDVI-I HDTV    $189.99 (after $30 mail in)

Those appear to be the best deals in my current price range. I haven't been keeping up on video cards lately, so any feedback would be appreciated. I'll be upgrading from an 8800GS.

I'd rather not go right too my $300 limit, but I will if it makes sense.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 26, 2009, 06:32:15 AM
Ok, related question. I tried looking up airflow articles at Toms, but they're talking to experts in a language I'm just learning (good learning on diminishing returns with fans though). So I'll ask here.

120mm fan exhaust halfway up the back.
80mm fan intake halfway up the side (basically blows right onto the video card)
120mm fan intake in the bottom of the front (arriving Thursday, I only have an 80mm in there now).
VGA Cooling Fan (cheap bet).

Two questions:

1) How much does fan speed matter? I found a cheap 80mm that goes above 2000rpm to replace the one on the side that only goes to 1200rpm, but I wasn't sure so figured I'd ask.
CFM is more useful than RPM. CFM = airflow measured as cubic feet per minute. Roughly speaking for fans of the same size the one that spins faster should give you larger CFM but that's not a guarantee. Noise is also an important factor unless you don't mind your case sounding like a jet turbine engine.

Quote
2) Do I need another exhaust in the top of the case or will the one 120mm in the back do it?
Only way to know for sure is to test it. (Take temps with and without the top fan).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 26, 2009, 06:33:16 AM
So I think I'm going to buy a new video card on my way home from work today, and wanted some feedback. Here are the options I'm looking at:

EVGA GeForce GTX 275 633MHZ 896MB 2.26GHZ DDR3 PCI-E Dual DVI-I HDTV Out Video Card        $278.88 (all prices CDN)
XFX Radeon HD 4890 XT 1GB 875MHZ 1GB 3.9GHZ GDDR5 PCI-E 2XDVI HDTV Video Card               $279.00 (after $20 mail in)
EVGA E-GEFORCE 9800GT 55NM 600MHZ 512MB 1.8GHZ 256BIT GDDR3 Dual DVI-I HDCP HDTV       $119.00 (after $20 mail in)
EVGA E-GEFORCE GTX 260 Core 216 55NM 576MHZ 896MB 1.998GHZ GDDR3 PCI-E 2XDVI-I HDTV    $189.99 (after $30 mail in)

Those appear to be the best deals in my current price range. I haven't been keeping up on video cards lately, so any feedback would be appreciated. I'll be upgrading from an 8800GS.

I'd rather not go right too my $300 limit, but I will if it makes sense.
What resolution do you run your games at?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on May 26, 2009, 06:38:00 AM
1680 x 1050


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 26, 2009, 06:40:38 AM
1680 x 1050
I'd go with the 260, or a 4870 if you prefer ATI.

The 9800 GT isn't going to be a big upgrade from your existing card (Think 8800 GS to 8800 GT). The 275 or 4890 is most likely overkill at your resolution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on May 26, 2009, 06:58:10 AM
Thanks man, that'll save me a few bucks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 26, 2009, 07:04:03 AM
Ok thanks Trippy.

And Bunk's question has me thinking about vidcards down the road. If I planned to purchase today, playing at the same 1680x1050, would the 260 be a significant enough upgrade from the 8800GTS? Or would a second 8800GTS in SLI be better?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 26, 2009, 07:41:27 AM
Ok thanks Trippy.

And Bunk's question has me thinking about vidcards down the road. If I planned to purchase today, playing at the same 1680x1050, would the 260 be a significant enough upgrade from the 8800GTS? Or would a second 8800GTS in SLI be better?
2nd 8800 GTS would be better for games that have decent support for SLI. Going from a single G92 8800 GTS to a 260 Core 216, it's going to depend on the game and quality settings. Some games, like say, Source Engine games, you probably won't notice any difference. For other games, like, say Crysis, you'll probably notice a signifcant difference.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on May 26, 2009, 07:57:15 AM
Also worth noting, I have the cheap 8800 that came with 384MB. I would have a really hard time finding a second one to SLI, and wouldn't really want to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on May 26, 2009, 08:01:24 AM
Try to get something without the mail in rebate, because MIR's are really stupid and they wont give it to you half the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 26, 2009, 12:22:05 PM
Ok thanks Trippy.

And Bunk's question has me thinking about vidcards down the road. If I planned to purchase today, playing at the same 1680x1050, would the 260 be a significant enough upgrade from the 8800GTS? Or would a second 8800GTS in SLI be better?
2nd 8800 GTS would be better for games that have decent support for SLI. Going from a single G92 8800 GTS to a 260 Core 216, it's going to depend on the game and quality settings. Some games, like say, Source Engine games, you probably won't notice any difference. For other games, like, say Crysis, you'll probably notice a signifcant difference.

Ah still case by case then. Ok, will wait for now. Nothing has been disappointing me visual/performance wise yet. Just the heat thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 26, 2009, 08:25:33 PM
Have you looked at your CPU/HSF again yet?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 27, 2009, 04:40:39 AM
After a few days, it seems to be operating at a pretty steady range. I have Speedfan logs at home, but the pattern of peaks and valleys (I'm a visual guy :wink:) is what I'd expect between idle/load. It's a little warm in my opinion, but when I get the new fans I ordered tomorrow, I'll be able to tell a bit better. Everything I've read says the 8800GTS runs a bit hot. If the fans/airflow don't impact the temperature under load at all, then I'll be taking it apart to see if they borked the thermal paste as Lantyssa had suggested. At that point I might actually just put liquid cooling back in. It's not so much that I need it per se, since according to the specs (and Trippy's confirmation), I'm now running in the safe idle/load range). It's more a piece of mind thing. No matter what I do this computer still sits under my desk blowing air out the back with no flow under that desk.

I still am curious why the last CPU and mobo broke though after only two years. Maybe that's common, but I've never had that happen over the course of four laptops, two Macs and three other desktops (that's not a lot of computers for 20 years, so I accept that luck could be a part). But heck, my old Alienware box is a media server I barely clean that out annually, and my father's been using my 10 year old Dell (from the DRAM days) to run his business for seven years.

The only things I can think of is either they overclocked it the wrong way, or something went crappy on one component and it took down the other one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 27, 2009, 06:48:57 AM
I have an 8800GT that had a miserable little fan and a dorky heatsink, idling at 70 C (158F) up to 94C (200F) at load .  My box has two 120 front intake fans, one 120 in back and a 120 on the cpu itself. The only thing that brought the GPU temp down was buying an aftermarket zalman GPU fan. It brought the temp down significantly to around 60C at load, 48C at idle.

Not only was the factory cooler's fan miserably small for the task, the 'thermal' paste was gobs and gobs of this white goop, which as Lantyssa suggested earlier, was probably acting as an insulator rather than a conductor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 27, 2009, 08:53:03 AM
One of these guys? (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835118001). I ask because I was checking out one from Artic Cooling (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835186016) and in the process also came across this bigger model (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835186027).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 27, 2009, 09:53:45 AM
Yep, that's exactly the one I used. I don't know if I would bother with the monstrosity you linked. I'm not convinced it would do a better job.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on May 27, 2009, 10:12:08 AM
One problem I've seen with some watercooling setups, is nothing to cool the other hot bits. Northbridge/Southbridge/MCP/mosfets/heat-generating-chip-o-doom whathaveyou on the board. And as annoying as people find 2slot video cards, I prefer them as it gets more of the heat from the gpu out of the case, rather than having it get pushed off the card into the general area.

And the number of fans isn't as important as getting the air to flow through.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 27, 2009, 11:42:09 AM
Ok, so after the new fans I'll take a look at that Zalman VF900. Thanks guys.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 29, 2009, 06:23:15 AM
I have a Win .bat file and I want it to wait instead of closing when it completes, but I forget how to have a batch file request keyboard input.  I just need something stupid that will just wait for input, like 'read'.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 29, 2009, 06:48:01 AM
Would the pause command work? Stops the script and wait for any keystroke to continue. Anyways....

http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/ntcmds.mspx?mfr=true


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 29, 2009, 07:07:49 AM
Would the pause command work? Stops the script and wait for any keystroke to continue.

Yes.  Thank you.  Also thanks for the link, seems like I had that link somewhere in the past but I've been a real dumbass lately.  Too much AIX/SAP/Oracle/DB2/perl/ksh being crammed into my head, pushing out other things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on May 31, 2009, 11:28:43 AM
Anyone know how to remove dud programs from the Uninstall Programs list in Windows 7? I've tried solutions for Vista and they don't work. The program doesn't show up in Registry either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 31, 2009, 02:14:46 PM
Sorry for the length of these "quick" questions. I'm learning a lot here about topics I never worried about before.

I've been manipulating fan intakes and exhausts, trying to find something optimal for noise and temp, and came across Real Temp (and that awesome Toms Hardware Core Temp article) from SnakeCharmer's summer 2008 cooling opinions thread.

While would Real Temp 3.0 show a core temperature a full 20 degrees C less than SpeedFan?  Here's what I've got going on right now:

  • SpeedFan 4.38- GPU: 58C, Core0: 55C, Core1: 52C, Core2: 52C, Core3: 56C
  • Real Temp 3.00- GPU: 58C, Core0: 31C, Core1: 31C, Core2: 28C, Core 3: 28C

Is Real Temp giving me a thermal junction reading why SpeedFan a case reading? Seems like that could be happening given how close the Core temps are to the GPU.

Is this disparity a result in me flubbing some setting in SpeedFan? Here's what I've got atm in Configure (man I love that these programs use CSV logs):


As an aside, according to Intel, my max core temps should be 76.3C. For the last few nights, my peaks and valleys have looked roughly like this:


I'm not particularly comfortable running that close to the cap. Today I moved some of the fans around. The 120mm in the back seems real wimpy though. Any contemporary advice on a good 120mm? And Trippy, you mentioned earlier that CFM > RPM. Any advice on a good CFM? I've got a this Thermaltake (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811999120) in the front, set around 4600RPM (no idea what that is in CFM), but both that 120mm and the other 80mm I have as exhaust on the side don't seem as up to the task as they could be. And I don't want another Thermaltake if I can help it because this one is pretty freakin' loud at max speed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on May 31, 2009, 04:33:47 PM
I like Scythe fans, I'm using Scythe S-Flex Es (http://www.svc.com/sy-fan-sff21e.html) in my case currently, they have slightly louder ones at higher cfm and quieter/lower.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 31, 2009, 05:01:42 PM
I like CoolerMaster fans.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on May 31, 2009, 06:18:44 PM
I have all CoolerMaster cases now, but their fans move less air and are noisier than the various scythes. The only fan of their I haven't replaced is the fairly low rpm huge one on the side of the HAF case. ymmv


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 31, 2009, 08:24:15 PM
Sorry for the length of these "quick" questions. I'm learning a lot here about topics I never worried about before.

I've been manipulating fan intakes and exhausts, trying to find something optimal for noise and temp, and came across Real Temp (and that awesome Toms Hardware Core Temp article) from SnakeCharmer's summer 2008 cooling opinions thread.

While would Real Temp 3.0 show a core temperature a full 20 degrees C less than SpeedFan?  Here's what I've got going on right now:

  • SpeedFan 4.38- GPU: 58C, Core0: 55C, Core1: 52C, Core2: 52C, Core3: 56C
  • Real Temp 3.00- GPU: 58C, Core0: 31C, Core1: 31C, Core2: 28C, Core 3: 28C

Is Real Temp giving me a thermal junction reading why SpeedFan a case reading? Seems like that could be happening given how close the Core temps are to the GPU.

Is this disparity a result in me flubbing some setting in SpeedFan? Here's what I've got atm in Configure (man I love that these programs use CSV logs):
What CPU do you have and what CPUID is Real Temp reporting? And what is the delta from TJ Max?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on June 01, 2009, 06:10:36 AM
Just as an aside, be careful how much faith you put into the numbers generated by 3rd party temp monitoring utilities.

What they do is poll a register on the MB that the maker of the program is 'pretty sure' is where the MB maker stores the readings.  Those readings are usually pretty straight forward and follow a common format but also sometimes they aren't.

Some MB manufacturers publish that info and others don't.  Also, some of the temp monitoring programs are well maintained and others, not so much.

What I am saying is that you might need to do some homework on how well supported your board/utility combo is.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 01, 2009, 06:23:00 AM
These days temperatures can be read directly from the CPU without having to go through some funky sensor monitoring chip on the MB. Unfortunately the way the Intel CPUs report the information is all fucked up as they report a delta from a value (Tjunction Max) that Intel, for some inexplicable reason, is loathe to publish comprehensively. This is why different programs report different temperatures. Their databases of CPUs have differing values for Tj Max.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 01, 2009, 09:32:40 AM
Today I moved some of the fans around. The 120mm in the back seems real wimpy though. Any contemporary advice on a good 120mm?
Keep in mind the larger fans run slower.  They can still move a lot of air when they feel like they are not doing much because of their increased area. (2.25 increase in area for the 80mm -> 120mm)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 01, 2009, 02:58:29 PM
This is less of a question and more of a "give a hoot, don't be a dumbass": in thinking on how to get Demigod to actually connect to other players, I suddenly got the idea that I should put my DSL modem into DMZ mode.  After all, the only thing connecting to it is my router, which does NAT.  In any case, I wasn't able to see a magical improvement in Demigod but I did finally pass a utorrent port-forward test (after I put the new port number into my router's port-forwarding list).  I also decided to enable security on the DSL modem's wireless adapter even though I have it turned off, and I set it to channel 3 (my router uses channel 1) because I don't trust machines.  I am pretty sure that I am not imagining a slight speed boost, but then again I might be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 01, 2009, 03:39:54 PM
What CPU do you have and what CPUID is Real Temp reporting? And what is the delta from TJ Max?

CPU: Quad Q9550
Temp being reported: 23, 23, 18, 19 (all celcius)
Delta from TJ Max: 53, 53, 58, 57.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 01, 2009, 03:40:16 PM
*sorry, double post*


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 01, 2009, 04:01:13 PM
What CPU do you have and what CPUID is Real Temp reporting? And what is the delta from TJ Max?

CPU: Quad Q9550
Temp being reported: 23, 23, 18, 19 (all celcius)
Delta from TJ Max: 53, 53, 58, 57.
That looks wrong. What's are the Tjunction Max values Real Temp is showing? It should be 100Cish (it's 100C plus or minus some calibration number). It looks like it's set to 75Cish.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 01, 2009, 04:18:46 PM
Oh, yea, sorry. The default was 100. I set them to 76 based on what Intel said was the max temp for this processor. So I set it back to default. As you would suspect, the numbers increased by 24 :-)

CPU: Quad Q9550 (forgot to add: 2.83GHz)
Temp being reported: 56, 55, 53, 53 (all celcius)
Delta from TJ Max: 44, 45, 47, 47

And you had asked specifically about "CPUID". I couldn't find it originally but saw this in the *.ini file. Says "CPUID=0x1067A".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 01, 2009, 05:27:00 PM
Are those idle or load temps?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 01, 2009, 05:31:08 PM
Idle (3-4% load). Based on one night of Folding@Home (45-50% load) and Battle Forge (13-17% load), temperature seemed to jump up about 12C. I'm headed into Fallout 3 while the log is running to see if it's the same for that too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 01, 2009, 05:40:34 PM
Oh, yea, sorry. The default was 100. I set them to 76 based on what Intel said was the max temp for this processor. So I set it back to default. As you would suspect, the numbers increased by 24 :-)

CPU: Quad Q9550 (forgot to add: 2.83GHz)
Temp being reported: 56, 55, 53, 53 (all celcius)
Delta from TJ Max: 44, 45, 47, 47

And you had asked specifically about "CPUID". I couldn't find it originally but saw this in the *.ini file. Says "CPUID=0x1067A".
Okay that's more reasonable. Idle temps look a little high by about 5C but going back and looking at your graph I think you are okay CPU cooling-wise now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 01, 2009, 05:43:08 PM
Those temps don't seem a bit high, Trippy?  I mean, my Q6600 overclocked to 3.4Ghz is sitting at 36-38C idle, and mid 50's on load, with ambient temp of about 22C.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 01, 2009, 05:52:41 PM
Ok, just ran Fallout 3 for a few minutes. Results as expected: about 10-12C increase on CPUs with a goodly jump in GPU from 56C to 76C on average.


@SnakeCharmer: definitely interested in that answer too :-) But in struggling to find this exact chip on the Intel Finder tool, I see there's quite a range of max/load temps. There can be some good variance even in the same family. I wish I was running RealTemp before my CPU blew though so I had a frame of reference.

@Trippy: Thanks!

Today I moved some of the fans around. The 120mm in the back seems real wimpy though. Any contemporary advice on a good 120mm?
Keep in mind the larger fans run slower.  They can still move a lot of air when they feel like they are not doing much because of their increased area. (2.25 increase in area for the 80mm -> 120mm)
Good point. Seems like I'm doing ok atm, so I'll probably hold off on new fans.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 01, 2009, 05:54:10 PM
Those temps don't seem a bit high, Trippy?  I mean, my Q6600 overclocked to 3.4Ghz is sitting at 36-38C idle, and mid 50's on load, with ambient temp of about 22C.
From what I can tell given a "standard" (read "non-enthusiast") cooling setup that CPU should idle at around 50C. With a better heatsink/fan and case cooling you can drop it 10C or more but we haven't gotten to that point yet with Darniaq's setup.

Also, unless you know what the Tjunction Max value is for your Intel Core CPU and your temperature monitoring program has it set correctly, you can't trust temperature numbers.

Edit: Actually you can't trust the temperature numbers even if you know the Tjunction Max cause the sensor in the CPU isn't that accurate, and the sensor in the 45nm CPUs are much worse than the 65nm CPUs.

The sensor is more accurate the closer you get to Tjunction Max but the further away you are (i.e. the cooler the CPU) the less accurate the reading.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 01, 2009, 06:51:52 PM
Whoa.  Lots of stuff way over my head.

Anyway, both Real Temp and Speed Fan are reporting identical temps each, and they equal to whats being reported in the bios, so I feel safe, I guess. 

@ Darniaq:  For whatever its work, I'm using a ZALMAN CNPS9700 LED 110mm 2 Ball CPU Cooler (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835118019) and Antec 900 case (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129021), using the 4 stock fans all set to 'low' speed, except the very back one set at medium since it's the one that's closest to the CPU fan.  Whisper quiet, with (apparently) good cooling.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 01, 2009, 07:24:27 PM
With your machine only getting a 10-12C increase under load I would say your cooling is fine.

This is less of a question and more of a "give a hoot, don't be a dumbass": in thinking on how to get Demigod to actually connect to other players, I suddenly got the idea that I should put my DSL modem into DMZ mode.  After all, the only thing connecting to it is my router, which does NAT.
I'm uncomfortable setting my main machine as the DMZ since then my router isn't acting as a dumb firewall.  I don't trust my neighbors enough to not be spewing gunk all over the network.  If it's a little more of a hassle to stop their traffic dead at the router, it's worth it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on June 02, 2009, 08:18:34 AM
This is less of a question and more of a "give a hoot, don't be a dumbass": in thinking on how to get Demigod to actually connect to other players, I suddenly got the idea that I should put my DSL modem into DMZ mode.  After all, the only thing connecting to it is my router, which does NAT.  In any case, I wasn't able to see a magical improvement in Demigod but I did finally pass a utorrent port-forward test (after I put the new port number into my router's port-forwarding list).  I also decided to enable security on the DSL modem's wireless adapter even though I have it turned off, and I set it to channel 3 (my router uses channel 1) because I don't trust machines.  I am pretty sure that I am not imagining a slight speed boost, but then again I might be.

For peer to peer games you should usually start with setting yourself up on a static ip, then setup some port forwarding.  Sadly the games wont always tell you what ports to forward.  You want to pull off something like this. (http://p2p.weblogsinc.com/2005/04/24/how-to-configure-your-router-to-allow-fast-bittorrent-downloads/)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 02, 2009, 09:44:32 AM
I like how the guide you linked doesn't mention setting a static IP for yourself.  It also doesn't mention what happens if you do this and have UPnP enabled. :awesome_for_real:

Anyway, I have set up port-range forwarding on the router (and have had a static IP on my rig for a while, for great justice), although the first comment about port-triggering is interesting.  I might give that one a try since I'm trusting some guy on the internet as to which ports Demigod uses.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on June 02, 2009, 03:08:08 PM
I want to dual boot OSX and have my own HackinTosh running. It's to help a friend out with something he's working on. I'm not asking for someone to link me to illegal software, I just want all the steps outside of that.

I stumbled upon these two links: how to dual boot (http://www.hackint0sh.org/forum/f184/65668.htm) and common issues (http://www.hackint0sh.org/forum/f181/60303.htm). Anything else I should know?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on June 02, 2009, 04:36:43 PM
I like how the guide you linked doesn't mention setting a static IP for yourself.  It also doesn't mention what happens if you do this and have UPnP enabled. :awesome_for_real:

Anyway, I have set up port-range forwarding on the router (and have had a static IP on my rig for a while, for great justice), although the first comment about port-triggering is interesting.  I might give that one a try since I'm trusting some guy on the internet as to which ports Demigod uses.

I just grabbed a link off google without reading it, there are tons of guides on how to setup a Static IP, I think that uTorrent has a built in link to guides even.  There is a dsl related site that gives you guides for almost any router under the sun.  Anyways google that shit yourself, sorry that link sucked.  But really as long as you can get into your router's settings in a browser window its all pretty easy to fiddle with and find it yourself.  Its figuring out the game's ports that is usually a bitch in the f2p korean game world.

http://portforward.com/    <--- has a static ip setup guide, since you need it to port forward. 

http://forums.shoryuken.com/showthread.php?t=185319

That's a useful thread with some basics and the port settings for ps3/360, might as well do it all while your fucking with your router.

More Port Forwarding Infoz (http://linksys.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/linksys.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=688&p_created=1084219690&p_sid=btIGUT4i&p_accessibility=0&p_lva=358&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9zb3J0X2J5PSZwX2dyaWRzb3J0PSZwX3Jvd19jbnQ9MSZwX3Byb2RzPTAmcF9jYXRzPSZwX3B2PSZwX2N2PSZwX3)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 02, 2009, 08:55:58 PM
I know how to forward ports, but as it so happens Demigod is a piece of shit even after the 1.01 patch.  The PS3/360 port info is pretty useful, though, except my 360 doesn't like having a static IP for whatever reason (it's made of garbage and chinese fingertips).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 02, 2009, 09:30:05 PM
Not quite sure how to put this...but do drivers degrade over time?  Degrade may not be the right word, but up until about a week ago, everything was fine.  Now my system is hanging up on startup (Vista Prem 64) at two specific places.  Either when the horizontal progress bar is up, or just shortly thereafter when the mouse pointer appears on the screen.  At first, I thought it was my mouse (Razer DeathAdder - still think it might be) because it wasn't going through its second 'power up' after boot.  So I updated my drivers and it went away for a couple days.  Then the keyboard (G15) started acting a bit wonky on start up, but not going through its second power up cycle.  The mouse is connected to a USB port on the keyboard, so the problem may be starting at the KB.  Is there any way to find a log of any errors on start up?  It does this specifically on start up without fail after being powered off for a few hours.  It seems to correct itself (without fail) by pressing the reset button during the hang on going through the motions again. 

Am updating my G15 drivers and software tonight.  Hopefully this fixes it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 03, 2009, 05:37:06 AM
Not quite sure how to put this...but do drivers degrade over time?

Yes. (http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r6/scv/rl/articles/ser-050323-talk-ref.pdf)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on June 03, 2009, 09:25:08 AM
Not quite sure how to put this...but do drivers degrade over time?

Yes. (http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r6/scv/rl/articles/ser-050323-talk-ref.pdf)

Problem Solved. (http://www.honeywell.com/sites/aero/Data-Processing3_C81A0CEAA-6658-FAB9-52DC-CAA2E754579D_HBA98E945-AC7E-6D56-4466-0FA5D47F769F.htm)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on June 03, 2009, 02:42:18 PM
Edit: Fixed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 05, 2009, 05:48:57 PM
Finally got an enclosure for my old busted 250gb drive. In the enclosure, my PC sees the drive, but can't mount it. I tried a few programs, but none of them see the volume itself.

I'm not really sure just how borked this thing is. Are there any good programs that will a) recognize something, whatever it is, attached; and, b) tell me the type of broken it is and whether it's fixable?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 05, 2009, 06:50:35 PM
If you run Computer Management (or whatever the equivalent is on Vista if you are using that) and look at Disk Management, do you see the drive there? If so what state does it think the drive is in? E.g. does it see a partition or does it think there's no partition on it at all?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 06, 2009, 02:40:19 AM
I had a fairly similar problem a while back. Somehow (I assume my brother) the USB connector on my seagate external broke. So I had to take it apart, which was difficult as those things are built like tanks. Once I had the hard disk I tried putting it a new enclosure, connecting it and nothing happened. I waited a few months, tried again, and it works.  :uhrr:

Keep trying!  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 06, 2009, 05:01:44 AM
Thanks. @Trippy: I'll let you know. Right now I'm running GetBackData for NTFS on the other external drive which seems borked. It's 11 hours into its 4 hour process  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 06, 2009, 07:34:28 AM
Just a quick question, right now I have 2 gig RAM (2x Corsair Value S. PC5300 DDR2 1024mb) but I want more. I'm looking at more (Corsair TWIN2X PC6400 DDR2 4GB KIT CL5
Kit w/2x 2GB XMS2-6400 dimm's, CL5-5-5-18, 800MHz) but I'm not sure my motherboard can handle it. I have an Asus P5N-D, nForce-750i SLI.

Also, right now I have a GeForce 9600GT 512mb, would it be better to buy a new completely new graphic card or just to get another 9600 and run with that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 06, 2009, 08:01:36 AM
Just a quick question, right now I have 2 gig RAM (2x Corsair Value S. PC5300 DDR2 1024mb) but I want more. I'm looking at more (Corsair TWIN2X PC6400 DDR2 4GB KIT CL5
Kit w/2x 2GB XMS2-6400 dimm's, CL5-5-5-18, 800MHz) but I'm not sure my motherboard can handle it. I have an Asus P5N-D, nForce-750i SLI.
What speed is your memory bus running at right now? The RAM you have in there now is actually too slow for your motherboard (or more accurately not rated as fast as the max memory bus speed for your MB). You should be running PC6400 RAM in there (800 MHz memory bus speed). If you are running at 667 MHz (PC5300) you could try running your old RAM at 800 MHz to match the new kit you are looking at or you might have to run the new kit at the slower speed. I.e. you have to run both kits at the same speed.

Quote
Also, right now I have a GeForce 9600GT 512mb, would it be better to buy a new completely new graphic card or just to get another 9600 and run with that?
Get a new card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on June 06, 2009, 09:48:03 AM
corsairmemory.com has a great tool that lets you look these things up btw.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 06, 2009, 11:06:13 AM
I have a dual memory type motherboard, with 4 slots for DDR2 and 2 slots for DDR3.

240-pin DDR2 DIMM Banking:   4 (2 banks of 2)
240-pin DDR3 DIMM Banking:   2 (2 banks of 1)
Chipset:   Intel P35
DDR2 SDRAM Frequencies:   PC2-5300, PC2-6400 and PC2-8500
DDR3 SDRAM Frequencies:   PC3-6400, PC3-8500 and PC3-10600

I run a Core2Duo E6750. I am currently running DDR2 memory. Can I run DDR3 memory with the current cpu, or do I have to upgrade to a different CPU? Also, would it even be worth it if (would DDR3 be faster than DDR2). I know back when I got this board, DDR3 speeds were not faster than DDR2s.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 06, 2009, 02:55:18 PM
Just a quick question, right now I have 2 gig RAM (2x Corsair Value S. PC5300 DDR2 1024mb) but I want more. I'm looking at more (Corsair TWIN2X PC6400 DDR2 4GB KIT CL5
Kit w/2x 2GB XMS2-6400 dimm's, CL5-5-5-18, 800MHz) but I'm not sure my motherboard can handle it. I have an Asus P5N-D, nForce-750i SLI.
What speed is your memory bus running at right now? The RAM you have in there now is actually too slow for your motherboard (or more accurately not rated as fast as the max memory bus speed for your MB). You should be running PC6400 RAM in there (800 MHz memory bus speed). If you are running at 667 MHz (PC5300) you could try running your old RAM at 800 MHz to match the new kit you are looking at or you might have to run the new kit at the slower speed. I.e. you have to run both kits at the same speed.

Is ripping out my old RAM and just put in the new a viable option? That might be easier and 6 gig RAM is dirt cheap right now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 06, 2009, 07:00:16 PM
Just a quick question, right now I have 2 gig RAM (2x Corsair Value S. PC5300 DDR2 1024mb) but I want more. I'm looking at more (Corsair TWIN2X PC6400 DDR2 4GB KIT CL5
Kit w/2x 2GB XMS2-6400 dimm's, CL5-5-5-18, 800MHz) but I'm not sure my motherboard can handle it. I have an Asus P5N-D, nForce-750i SLI.
What speed is your memory bus running at right now? The RAM you have in there now is actually too slow for your motherboard (or more accurately not rated as fast as the max memory bus speed for your MB). You should be running PC6400 RAM in there (800 MHz memory bus speed). If you are running at 667 MHz (PC5300) you could try running your old RAM at 800 MHz to match the new kit you are looking at or you might have to run the new kit at the slower speed. I.e. you have to run both kits at the same speed.
Is ripping out my old RAM and just put in the new a viable option? That might be easier and 6 gig RAM is dirt cheap right now.
Certainly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 07, 2009, 02:44:25 AM
Thanks for the help.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 08, 2009, 08:53:30 AM
If you run Computer Management (or whatever the equivalent is on Vista if you are using that) and look at Disk Management, do you see the drive there? If so what state does it think the drive is in? E.g. does it see a partition or does it think there's no partition on it at all?

Just a note that I believe diskmgmt.msc still exists, I recall using it while setting up W7.  It actually worked for activating some disks, although I don't know why they were not active in the first place.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 09, 2009, 08:12:03 PM
I would love for someone to tell me how to keep my PS3 from kicking my pc and wife's laptop offline everytime I start it up...And if you can do it in the most simple, layman's terms possible I'd greatly appreciate it.  Using a linksys WRT54GS router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on June 10, 2009, 12:27:40 AM
I would guess it's a DHCP issue. DHCP (as I understand it) is a protocol that allows things like routers etc to easily add other devices to your network and to manage the connections without conflicts.

You'll need your router manual. Find out how to access the router configuration - usually it's accessed by pointing your browser at an IP like http://10.0.0.x/ and entering an admin username & password, but check the router manual.

Then you want to find the "DHCP" part of the configuration page and enable DHCP server, save settings and exit. If that doesn't work then someone more knowledgeable than me will have to help you out  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 10, 2009, 09:55:59 AM
Or if you can, set the PS3 to a static address.  I don't have one, so I don't know how their network config works.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 10, 2009, 10:22:23 AM
On the PS3, it's in the Settings column.  Go down to Network Settings > Internet Connection Settings, choose Custom and somewhere in there find IP Address Setting and choose Manual.  Set it to something not used by another computer/device.  If you set it to the same IP as, say, your wife's laptop then you're in for a bad time.  Everyone gets their own IP address.

You can also choose Automatic (it's DHCP, meaning the router picks an IP for you) and this should work fine, but a static IP will open up other possibilities that can be saved for a later time.

Edit: I suppose I can say something about picking an IP address although I can't remember a lot about your previous post on this.  You will have a range of IP for your LAN, probably 192.168.x.x (you can specify this but let's focus!), so by way of example I chose 192.168.1.150 for my PC's IP address.  DHCP won't pick this one to assign out but it's probably a good idea to choose something that isn't the one your wife's laptop has already.  Otherwise we will have to have you do a ipconfig /release, ipconfig /renew or other onerous bullshit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 10, 2009, 10:39:24 AM
So far, everything is set to automatic on every machine.  I reset everything last night and put everything on default settings, with the wireless access set to WPA Personal requiring a key for access.  So far, the PS3 kicks a random machine off for about 5 seconds, until the router decides to give whatever machine was kicked off a new IP address.  Its like the PS3 says 'I want your IP address, so I'm going to tell the router to give it to me.  TAKE THAT!".  FWIW, the PS3 is hard wired to the router rather than going wireless.

I really didnt want to go through the process of assigning everyone a dedicated IP, but looks like I'm going to have to.  FUN!

Edit:  Thanks for the advice, all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: grebo on June 10, 2009, 10:41:10 AM
Finally got an enclosure for my old busted 250gb drive. In the enclosure, my PC sees the drive, but can't mount it. I tried a few programs, but none of them see the volume itself.

I'm not really sure just how borked this thing is. Are there any good programs that will a) recognize something, whatever it is, attached; and, b) tell me the type of broken it is and whether it's fixable?

Spinrite (http://www.grc.com/default.htm) is pretty awesome.  It's resurrected a couple drives from the dead for me long enough to rescue some junk off of them.  Gibson may be a choad, but he writes good code.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: grebo on June 10, 2009, 10:45:46 AM
So far, everything is set to automatic on every machine.  I reset everything last night and put everything on default settings, with the wireless access set to WPA Personal requiring a key for access.  So far, the PS3 kicks a random machine off for about 5 seconds, until the router decides to give whatever machine was kicked off a new IP address.  Its like the PS3 says 'I want your IP address, so I'm going to tell the router to give it to me.  TAKE THAT!".  FWIW, the PS3 is hard wired to the router rather than going wireless.

I really didnt want to go through the process of assigning everyone a dedicated IP, but looks like I'm going to have to.  FUN!

Edit:  Thanks for the advice, all.

Is there a setting in the router for the range of DHCP addresses it will give out?  Are there separate ranges for wired and wireless?  Do they overlap?

Also, doesn't PS3 come with wireless LAN built in?  Maybe try that instead of the wire?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 10, 2009, 10:56:23 AM
I am kind of assuming you are correct when you say the PS3 is snagging a used IP address, however I expect this is a router problem since it should not happen.  You can be sure this is what happens if you note your laptop IP address, Do the Deed, then see what IP your PS3 gets.  The workaround, if so, is to assign a static IP.

You might want to look at installing some third-party firmware onto your router, like dd-wrt or similar.  Or not, since it can be a mild bother.  Stock LinkSys firmware is somewhat suspect, according to Some, but I find it gives me finer control over my router (WRT54GL).

Personally I like static IPs since I know who is doing what and can do port forwarding when things come to that.  Also, having a static IP on my PC means I can put a hosts file on my wife's machine and use a hostname for sharing purposes.  Or I can just remember the IP address. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 11, 2009, 01:02:20 PM
You don't have to assign everyone a static IP.  Just give the PS3 one and see if it stops hijacking the network for those five to ten seconds.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 11, 2009, 02:22:24 PM
I tried it first with just my main rig on a static, and when I started up the PS3, it kicked my PC offline.  So, I just went ahead and assigned every machine a static IP.

Working fine so far.

Still kicking every machine offline.

Damnit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 11, 2009, 02:37:01 PM
Anyone familiar with Dreamweaver using SFTP on a Free BSD/Apache webserver?

Here's the wierdness. We have two apache webservers, one running an earlier version of Free BSD and another the latest version.

On my Windows PC, I can SFTP via Dreamweaver to the old one, but not the new one. Furthermore, I can use a regular SFTP client to connect to either, no problem.

Also, this doesn't seem to happen with the very latest Dreamweaver ( I have a slightly older version).

I suspect that the SFTP authentication protocols invoked by my copy of Dreamweaver work on an older version of either Free BSD or whatever SFTP daemon is running on the server, but not on the new one configured 'as is'.

Either that, or the port that Dreamwaver is talking to FreeBSD on the new machine is something that when replied to by the SFTP server, Windows Firewall balks at.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 12, 2009, 12:22:14 AM
I have pretty much resorted to deleting DW's WinFileCache.dat file as the 1st step in dealing with any DW related problem.  It can be foundin {your profile}\Application Data\Adobe\Dreamweaver CS4\en_US\Configuration

I have even made a shortcut to that dir on my desktop (FU very much adobe!)

Other than that hasn't the ftp (including sftp) protocol been pretty much unchanged for like the last 10 years or more?  As such your DW version shouldn't matter, don't hold me to that though because adobe does suck.  I love how they implemented SVN into CS4 and hard locked it to a version that was a year out of date before CS4 was even released, so maybe they are using some ftp code from 1991.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 12, 2009, 12:42:48 AM
Could be, and thanks for the input. I'll try it tomorrow.

Another thing that occurred to me is that the 'default' sftp authentication method in Free BSD has to be tweaked for the 'particular' authentication methodology THIS particular version of Dreamweaver requires.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on June 12, 2009, 04:01:59 AM
I tried it first with just my main rig on a static, and when I started up the PS3, it kicked my PC offline.  So, I just went ahead and assigned every machine a static IP.

Working fine so far.

Still kicking every machine offline.

Damnit.

OK, try disabling UPnP.

First of all try turning it off on the PS3: Network Settings -> Custom -> in there somewhere.

If that doesn't help try disabling it in the router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 12, 2009, 08:36:10 AM
About the sftp, ftp and sftp are not the same thing.  Don't even look at ftp when working on a sftp problem.  Also there is a v1 and v2 of SSL which might be impactful here.  We have some old machines which we have to use the -1 flag to force the ssh client to use v1 or else it won't connect.

I'll also note that you can use ssh or scp to help diagnose sftp problems since they all use the same ssl stuff under the hood, although I'm not familiar with how this is done on Windows (I use WinSCP).  I'll often pass a -v or -vv or -vvv to ssh (on AIX) and see what happens with the authentication, but often that is very vague (security by obfuscation).  It would probably be a good idea to compare sshd on the two BSD servers, binary version as well as contents of the conf file (/etc/ssh/sshd.conf and/or ssh.conf ?).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 12, 2009, 09:55:56 AM
Windows sftp/ssh is all third party.  It doesn't come native with the system, at least as of XP.  So its implementation will vary.  Who knows what Dreamweaver used?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 12, 2009, 01:15:42 PM
About the sftp, ftp and sftp are not the same thing.  Don't even look at ftp when working on a sftp problem.  Also there is a v1 and v2 of SSL which might be impactful here.  We have some old machines which we have to use the -1 flag to force the ssh client to use v1 or else it won't connect.

I'll also note that you can use ssh or scp to help diagnose sftp problems since they all use the same ssl stuff under the hood, although I'm not familiar with how this is done on Windows (I use WinSCP).  I'll often pass a -v or -vv or -vvv to ssh (on AIX) and see what happens with the authentication, but often that is very vague (security by obfuscation).  It would probably be a good idea to compare sshd on the two BSD servers, binary version as well as contents of the conf file (/etc/ssh/sshd.conf and/or ssh.conf ?).

Thanks Yego, that's a great deal of potentially helpful info. I'm starting to suspect that either the version of dreamweaver I am using uses an ssl v1 and our new BSD uses v2 (which would explain why the latest C4 Dreamweaver authenticats just fine).

Do you know off the top of your head if its possible to set the ssh .conf file to accept either v1 or v2 connections?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 13, 2009, 03:07:59 AM
Put both your sshd_config files in one place (at least somewhere where they can both be accessed by Unix command line tools on a single machine) and type (or munge to the equivalent):

diff sshd_config.old sshd_config.new | grep PasswordAuthentication



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 13, 2009, 08:53:56 AM
Thanks Trippy! Will try that monday.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 13, 2009, 06:38:45 PM
Finally got an enclosure for my old busted 250gb drive. In the enclosure, my PC sees the drive, but can't mount it. I tried a few programs, but none of them see the volume itself.

I'm not really sure just how borked this thing is. Are there any good programs that will a) recognize something, whatever it is, attached; and, b) tell me the type of broken it is and whether it's fixable?

Spinrite (http://www.grc.com/default.htm) is pretty awesome.  It's resurrected a couple drives from the dead for me long enough to rescue some junk off of them.  Gibson may be a choad, but he writes good code.

Thanks. I'll keep it in mind for the future. GetBackData didn't seem to cut it this time. What actually solved the problem was just plugging the drive to the mobo instead of running it through USB. According to some of the links I followed from here, seems like USB ports are less "forgiving" than the motherboard IDE cable.

So I've got the data off the second (Maxtor) drive that failed. Now I just need to pick up a second SATA cable to try that with my first failed drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 15, 2009, 07:25:50 AM
Do you know off the top of your head if its possible to set the ssh .conf file to accept either v1 or v2 connections?

You can, it's the Protocol parameter in sshd_config (server).  Default is "1,2" so check to see if it is commented (leading #).  There is also a Protocol parameter in ssh_config (client); this should (?) be the same even on a Win client.

Webified man pages: sshd_config (http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?sshd_config+5) ssh_config (http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?ssh_config+5)

As for comparing files in general (for this occasion I would use Trippy's suggestion), if you have it, I like using Vim: vim -d sshd_config.old sshd_config.new


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 15, 2009, 09:32:21 PM
Quick Question:

Best value in monitors under $250 from Newegg?

I was looking at this, but may not be best bang for my buck? My current monitor is a shit CRT that might be on the fritz, so I'm not terribly particular on size.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001314


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 16, 2009, 12:03:38 AM
Question is what do you expect to do with the monitor most? Play video games, watch movies, or edit photography? Those are the three features that fluctuate from monitor to monitor, namely, response time, video clarity and color fidelity. Generally speaking, TN monitors do great for games, but have poorer viewing angles for across-the-room movie viewing and color fidelity. The next type is IPS or PVA, but they tend to cost a bit more and come at the cost of some response time.

To get good marks in all 3, you have to spend in the neighborhood of ~400 at the very least, and then that's with smaller monitors.

Samsung has a good reputation, as does Dell, especially in the 20-24 inch range.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 16, 2009, 12:15:00 AM
Quick Question:

Best value in monitors under $250 from Newegg?

I was looking at this, but may not be best bang for my buck? My current monitor is a shit CRT that might be on the fritz, so I'm not terribly particular on size.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001314
Well size does matter cause that'll determine the native resolution of the monitor which in turn will influence how good your 3D performance will be depending on your GPU(s) if you run at the native resolution. I.e. if you are running at, say, 1024 x 768 right now and go to a 1920 x 1200 monitor your video card may go "mommy!" and curl in a corner to die. Or not. It depends on what your hardware is at the moment.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 16, 2009, 11:15:27 AM
if you go with a Dell stick with the crystal/ultra sharp line.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 16, 2009, 04:27:48 PM
I've never understood why you would overclock RAM? Can someone inform me of the benefits and maybe hand me a link to a guide?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 16, 2009, 04:35:10 PM
It's usually more just a side-effect of overclocking your CPU. Speeding up the clockspeed of your RAM can help in a handful of situations but you have to weigh the tradeoff of possibly needing looser timings to run at that faster speed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 16, 2009, 09:53:04 PM
Running a GTX 260, but only in 1280x1024.

Looking to go widescreen in the 20" or so range. I mostly game, and even though I do watch a decent amount of video, I'm not a nazi about the quality really. I don't do photo work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 16, 2009, 11:19:34 PM
I'd probably go for this Dell  (http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Displays/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-6523&~lt=popup&~ck=TopSellers) then.

Its a TN monitor, so not the bestest ever for video, but its also an Ultrasharp, which provides a better level of quality. Its got good response times for gaming. Your 260 will handle the resolution just fine as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2009, 03:07:46 AM
Running a GTX 260, but only in 1280x1024.

Looking to go widescreen in the 20" or so range. I mostly game, and even though I do watch a decent amount of video, I'm not a nazi about the quality really. I don't do photo work.
You should go to a store that has a decent selection of LCDs, write down the model numbers, go home and figure out which ones are TN panels and which ones are (S-)PVA/MVA panels (most "consumer" stores don't carry IPS panels, though you might get lucky) and see if you can stand the crappy colors and horrid viewing angles of TN panels. You probably won't be able to play games on them, unfortunately, so you probably will have difficulty in seeing differences in response times and "ghosting". Another issue is you probably won't be able to judge "input lag", which can be a problem on PVA and MVA panels.

Another thing to consider is whether or not you want to hook up any console systems you have to the monitor, in which case you'll need something that has more inputs beyond the normal D-SUB/DVI connections on the cheaper monitors. More expensive ones will have HDMI and even things like S-Video and component video inputs.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 17, 2009, 03:25:56 PM
Get this! (http://www.popsci.com/gear-amp-gadgets/article/2009-06/worlds-smallest-vga-display-literally-size-thumbnail)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 19, 2009, 01:37:37 PM
A need a good free screen capture program that can either capture a full screen or an active window and which automatically creates the file. Tired of Printscreen>Paint>Paste>(crop)>Save. Fraps seems to only work when there's a fullscreen game running and Quick Screen Capture looks bloated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on June 19, 2009, 02:03:51 PM
Alt-Print Screen will capture only the active window.  You still have to paste it into Paint to save it but should save you time on the cropping part.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 20, 2009, 02:33:23 PM
Time to extend my wi-fi range. I have a 802.11n (http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/WRT160N) for most of the house, and an old 802.11g (http://www.amazon.com/Linksys-WRT54G-Wireless-G-Router/dp/B00007KDVI). I figured I'd use the latter to extend the range by placing it in the far other corner of the house.

Is there a link to a straightforward online guide on how to do this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 20, 2009, 07:18:33 PM
Feh, nevermind the router. Now I got a NEW problem.

Started late last night after trying to buff up Oblivion with some mods. Computer acted fine for the whole day today until I tried to run Oblivion. Few minutes into the game (late last night and just now) the whole screen starts going screwy. Horizontal artifacting pattern. I was about to try Fallout 3 just to see if it's game-specific, but I can't even get the computer to operate stabley at the moment. I'm going to let it cool for an hour.

But here again in the saga of this computer, something I've never seen before. Images below are me taking pictures of the screen. The pictures suck, but they should at least clearly tell this story:

1. Computer is on. Background image not showing. If it wasn't blurry you'd see that there's a pattern of lines across the screen. Those lines are multi-color.
2. After about a minute. More lines across the screen. Everything is moving really slow. Cursor has a box of lines around.
3. I shut down through the START menu. Not clear here is that the shutdown screen is perfectly fine. No lines, no artifacts, nothing.

Could this mean now the video card burned out? Hoping not, but I feel like having just replaced the hdd, cpus, mobo, power supply and cooling system, it's the very last thing that hasn't gone (except the DVD-ROM drives, but I've got a million of those things kicking around anyway so don't care).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 20, 2009, 07:26:16 PM
Probably video card. Could be main memory.

If you boot into Safe Mode do you see the same video problems?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 20, 2009, 08:34:51 PM
After an hour and a half, I restarted into safe mode. Same problem. Slightly worse actually, this time top/bottom vertical lines. Thinking video card. If you think so as well, any recommendations? I don't need uber atm, but would at least like something better than what I had (8800GTS 640mb) if I can get it for under $200.

What would be the signs of main memory (which was also replaced)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on June 20, 2009, 08:43:11 PM
Looks like a bad video card to me. Have you got a spare to test with just in case? And for under $200 you can get a 4890.

memtest is good for checking main memory, as has been covered a few times here :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 21, 2009, 06:11:54 AM
Depending on where you live you can get a 4870 or a 4890 for 200$. A 4870 will be fine for 1900x1200 on almost all games.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 21, 2009, 07:45:36 AM
Hmm, interesting, back to ATI then? Got used to nVidia over the last few years with this computer, but ended my upgrade cycle on the old one with a 9800 pro. I remember having some driver problems a few years ago, but is that still something ATI graphics cards experience at this point? Any particular manfucturer better than the rest? Last time I went ATI it was with Sapphire.

And anything on the nVidia side worth considering in the about-$200 range?

The monitor atm has no artifacting, but any hefty game I try to launch pretty much just crashes at this point.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 21, 2009, 08:17:24 AM
You can get perfectly respectable GTX 260-series cards for under $200. I have one from XFX, and it has easily defeated everything I have thrown at it so far.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 21, 2009, 09:16:56 AM
The GeForce 260 is the Nvidia equivalent and it's a pretty good card. It also supports PhysX so if you enjoy games that feature that you might want to consider it. Just make sure you get the 216 version. But I've heard that the 260 handels large resolutions (1900x1200) worse than the ATI cards in the same pricerange.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 21, 2009, 09:29:19 AM
The GeForce 260 is the Nvidia equivalent and it's a pretty good card. It also supports PhysX so if you enjoy games that feature that you might want to consider it. Just make sure you get the 216 version. But I've heard that the 260 handels large resolutions (1900x1200) worse than the ATI cards in the same pricerange.

Is the 216 version something mentioned on the box?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 21, 2009, 09:42:27 AM
Newegg has 260s listed as both regular and 216 variety. I definitely want something that can handle 1920x1200 down the road, but right now I'm gaming at 1680x1050 anyway.

What's the difference between non-216 and 216? The latter is slightly more pricey but i'd go slightly over $200 if it's worth it.

I haven't played anything where I've noticed PhysX doing anything spectacular. But that could just be the game. Do we thing Modern Warfare 2 or Red Faction Guerilla will utilize it? Those are the next actiony titles on my radar.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on June 21, 2009, 11:14:04 AM
The GTX 275 is the equivalent of the 4890, not the 260. Current(june2009)Comparison (http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3588) And the 4890 beats it on price. As far as drivers go, the ATI 9.6 drivers in Win7x64 work fine, no issues, fan control and overclocking work right and stay where you set them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 21, 2009, 12:22:31 PM
Newegg has 260s listed as both regular and 216 variety. I definitely want something that can handle 1920x1200 down the road, but right now I'm gaming at 1680x1050 anyway.

What's the difference between non-216 and 216? The latter is slightly more pricey but i'd go slightly over $200 if it's worth it.

I haven't played anything where I've noticed PhysX doing anything spectacular. But that could just be the game. Do we thing Modern Warfare 2 or Red Faction Guerilla will utilize it? Those are the next actiony titles on my radar.

The 216 have 24 more Stream processors which makes the card slightly faster and it will probably last you longer. I'd go for, (but I'm no expert) and it doesn't cost more than 200$ if you order from Newegg. There are plenty of variantions on the card and I'm not sure which one you should get. Look at the options and read about it here (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-radeon,2326.html). Oh, and the 260 is a pretty big card and draws plenty of power and generates heat so make sure your system can handle it.

The PhysX website mentions Dark Void, Mirror's Edge, Sacred 2, Cryostasis, Terminator and some other game. It's hard to know what future titles will feature the engine but it's certainly not something negative.

List of all games using PhysX. (http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_physxgames_home.html)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 21, 2009, 03:29:47 PM
Hunh, may have been the RAM after all. Memtest86+ came up with errors on the second chip. Now I just need to find where I stuck the other two sticks I had bought a few months ago. Then I'll be able to give it a real test.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 21, 2009, 06:22:30 PM
Bah. Shit, nevermind. Looks like it was a bad stick and the videocard. Back to rattran's anandtech link (thanks man).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 21, 2009, 06:49:23 PM
Bah. Shit, nevermind. Looks like it was a bad stick and the videocard. Back to rattran's anandtech link (thanks man).
Are you running off of an AVR UPS?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 21, 2009, 07:46:15 PM
Nah, no UPS at all actually. Last one I had melted battery acid onto my hardwood floor :-) Why?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on June 21, 2009, 08:15:32 PM
Nah, no UPS at all actually. Last one I had melted battery acid onto my hardwood floor :-) Why?
:ye_gods:
Umm, you should consider an avr ups. If your power is bad enough to crack a battery, think of what it's doing to your computer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 21, 2009, 09:41:48 PM
Nah, no UPS at all actually. Last one I had melted battery acid onto my hardwood floor :-) Why?
One reason why you might be having multiple hardware issues is that the power going to your components is "flaky". I.e. it's possible either your power supply is flaky or the power going into your power supply is flaky. If it's the power coming from the wall that's wonky a UPS that has a good Automatic Voltage Regulator/ion (AVR) will help mitigate that by adjusting the voltage coming out of its battery-enabled sockets so that the voltage is always within the normal range even if what's coming out of the wall socket isn't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 04:55:23 AM
Hmm. The UPS I once had was in my old house, on which I never had any problems otherwise so assumed the battery just sucked. My current house I don't know well enough yet to know but my computer was running fine for about 11 months before all this started happening. And tbh I'm not quite sure if the powersupply ever did actually crap out. I replaced that first when things started happening, but that didn't fix any problems (unto itself anyway, I've never tested the currrent components with the original power).

But thanks to this suggestion, I'm going to test the voltage after work.

Edit:

Just occurred to me this started happening around the time the window air conditioner went in the same room. I'm going to pretend that timing is not the case though because otherwise that'll mean I could have saved a lot of money if I just checked to see if these outlets were on the same friggin circuit.

Edit 2:

I've been looking at UPSs and am a bit on the confused side. I need the AVR much more than I need the battery power. I never lose power while in the middle of something (storm coming means I shut down), but can imagine fluctuations. So is there a good model/company I should be focusing on? Spec:

CORSAIR CMPSU-650TX 650W ATX12V / EPS12V
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (2.83 GHz/12M Cache/1333 MHz FSB)
Motherboard:  Asus P5N-T Deluxe, 780i 3-way SLI (Socket 775)
CPU and Case Fan
Memory: Corsair XMS2 Xtreme 2x1024mb RAM
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
Sound: Creative Lab Sound Blaster X-Fi
500gb SATA-II 7200rpm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 07:16:42 AM
(Decided editing the eighth time was overkill :wink:)

From what I could find, it seems these are the idle/load wattages for the three main power drawers:

  • Graphics: 64W idle, 144W load
  • CPU: 23W Idle, 60W load
  • Motherboard: 69W
  • Hard drive: 10W-15W (though this is pretty constant)
  • DVD-ROM: 5W Idle, 18W load
  • DVD-Writer: 5W Idle, 18W load

So it seems like I'd need a UPS that at least could handle 300W. But how much does the rated wattage of a UPS contribute to its ability to be an effective AVR? I've seen devices that just regulate voltage, and the comments imply they do that better than the hybrid UPS/AVR ones, so I'm currently leaning that way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 22, 2009, 07:45:19 AM
So it seems like I'd need a UPS that at least could handle 300W. But how much does the rated wattage of a UPS contribute to its ability to be an effective AVR?
It doesn't unless you regularly have bad browouts for extended periods of time. Up to a certain point AVR circuity can boost low-voltages back up to regular voltage levels without needing to use the battery for power.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 07:53:06 AM
Ah ok. I never have brownouts. Only one blackout in this house and that was due to the sort of storm you wouldn't want to be on the computer through anyway :-)

Looking at APC LE1200 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812106005) at the moment. The price is right and the reviews seem good. I'm going to see if I can find it at retail though. I imagine shipping is going to be expensive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 22, 2009, 08:16:51 AM
Is there a reason why you don't want an UPS as well?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 08:36:52 AM
Price. I can do it right now if it's between $50-80 since UPS still to me is "nice to have", but anything over means I'm not gaming for another month or so. Is there a good AVR/UPS in that range? I keep seeing either AVRs or UPSes in that range, but to get both in one well-reviewed unit brings it over $100.

And at the moment, if I get this I pray it solves the problem and that it's not my vidcard (too).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 22, 2009, 08:44:16 AM
Well at this point your hardware may already be toast. An AVR/UPS is more to prevent future problems.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 08:49:27 AM
Heh, well, at least the mobo, CPU and power supply are all new enough to be under warranty if they're busted :-) Do all UPSes include an AVR function?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on June 22, 2009, 11:37:11 AM
Many of them do, but it will be listed in the specs. If you just put a window air conditioner in the same room/circuit, you will be having brownouts whenever it kicks on. Huge draw for a moment is why avr is nice, it'll compensate and keep your power clean.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 12:08:25 PM
Ah ok thanks Rattran. If the card at this point is hosed, I'm thinking of the XFX Radeon HD 4870 1GB (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150394&Tpk=XFX%20HD-487A-ZHFC%20Radeon%20HD%204870%201GB%20256-bit%20GDDR5). The price is right if I need an AVR/UPS and awesome if I don't need one at all. Figure if I get it and the problem is still happening, return it and keep researching. I don't have another PCI-E card I can test, since every one of my RL friends bailed to consoles long ago :-)

Edit: wow, jeezus, didn't mean to ask that retarded question. Nevermind on the card, I am looking again for the right one.

This'd all be a lot easier if I hadn't just dropped $1,400 fixing our family car... :wink:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 22, 2009, 01:53:05 PM
You can use a cross-fire capable card in an sli-capable motherboard.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 02:10:05 PM
Oh, wait, really? I thought that only could work if you hacked drivers? Or do you only need to try and hack it if you're going for an incompatible bridge? I like the 4870 a lot, but the GTX 260 (216) isn't a slouch either and seems to be in a comparable range.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 22, 2009, 02:41:20 PM
Both of the cards are very good. I'll point you towards some stuff (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-radeon,2326-19.html) to read (http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3588) so you can make the decision for yourself.

Oh, and the Nvidia drivers are usually better or so I've heard.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 22, 2009, 03:13:55 PM
Thanks Dion. It was actually those articiles that lead me to the 4870. Great stuff and I appreciate you posting.

I just didn't realize that an Crossfire-capable card can work on an SLI board if I'm only using one card. Now I think I'll be re-ordering the 4870 I just asked Newegg to cancel  :awesome_for_real:

The price, features and values all lined up perfectly. And I'd have enough left over for that AVR if I can't get on a different circle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on June 23, 2009, 03:48:31 AM
Great choice, you are making me jealous  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 24, 2009, 06:52:04 PM
Ok, so I ended up going with the PNY GTX 260 (core 216) instead. Got a slightly better deal and had enough left for the AVR. Only problem now is I'm still running with only 1gb of RAM while I try to track down the two I misplaced (or give up and order more). Talk about a bottleneck!

Thanks again for all the help all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 25, 2009, 08:41:54 AM
Should just run a dedicated circuit for your computer! I'm a cable pulling mofo sumbitch!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on June 25, 2009, 07:15:27 PM
Basically what I did without rewiring. Nothing else on this circuit. Getting the AVR anyway because I could :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ShenMolo on July 02, 2009, 01:41:49 PM
Total noob question but anyways:

On Internet Explorer (8 maybe), I pressed a key recently which expanded the browser window so that the toolbar on top is covered and only pops up if I hover the mouse over it. I thought it must have been a function key I pressed but I pressed them all again and it hasn't fixed it.

How do I restore my browser so that it looks normal? Tried a lot of things short of re-installing the browser. Normally I use Firefox but will occasionally use IE so getting it back to "normal" would be helpful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 02, 2009, 02:28:31 PM
Try f11 again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ShenMolo on July 02, 2009, 02:47:05 PM
Try f11 again.

Perfect!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 03, 2009, 06:09:48 PM
Vague question of the day:  Why is my computer starting to progressively run worse?

I have: Updated drivers, defrag'd the HD, cleared cookies, cleared temp files, ensured the registry is without errors, have made sure it is completely viri/malware/spyware free (in as much as microtrends online virus scanner, avg free, windows defender, spy-bot, ad-aware will allow).  All stress tests do not indicate any problems other than progressively lower scores in benchmarks.  Memtest and prime95 do not yield any errors with RAM (have run stress tests for 12-14 hours at a pop).  I have updated my bios.  I have reverted to different bios versions.  I've tried older driver versions. 

Startup takes about 2 minutes from a power down state to desktop.  It takes 15 seconds for IE7 to come up, during which time the computer freezes up.

Vista prem 64
500GB 7200 HD SATAII (WD, I think)
8800GTS G92 in SLI (temps never higher than abt 60c during gaming/stress tests)
Q6600 oc'd at 3.2Ghz (temps never higher than 52c during gaming/stress tests)
8GB RAM
Asus 750i SLI mobo (P5N-D, I think)

Short of doing a fresh Vista install or upgrading to W7, what are my options?  If I didn't have 100GB plus of games to redownload, I'd do it in a heartbeat.  I don't know how to back up games on an external HD, then move to a new OS install - if that's even possible.  I've got a 1TB external HD collecting dust that I'd love to use, but backing up/then reinstalling games

I'm getting so fed up with it, I'm tempted to go to finallyfast.com or whatever the hell it is.  And I'm only halfway kidding.

Thanks for the help.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 04, 2009, 12:47:10 AM
sounds like malware to me.  you might try disabling some msconfig/startup items or just killing all the unknowns in your task manager to try and narrow it down.  Alternatively if you can remember a date when it was running much better do a system restore to that time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 04, 2009, 02:16:31 AM
Post a HijackThis log.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 04, 2009, 06:55:40 AM
Logfile of Trend Micro HijackThis v2.0.2
Scan saved at 7:51:39 AM, on 7/4/2009
Platform: Windows Vista SP2 (WinNT 6.00.1906)
MSIE: Internet Explorer v7.00 (7.00.6002.18005)
Boot mode: Normal

Running processes:
C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG8\avgtray.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Lavasoft\Ad-Aware\AAWTray.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Razer\DeathAdder\razerhid.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre6\bin\jusched.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Media Player\wmplayer.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Razer\DeathAdder\razertra.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Razer\DeathAdder\razerofa.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe
C:\Program Files (x86)\Trend Micro\HijackThis\HijackThis.exe

R1 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Search Page = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=54896
R0 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Start Page = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=69157
R1 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Default_Page_URL = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=69157
R1 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Default_Search_URL = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=54896
R1 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Search Page = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=54896
R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Start Page = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=69157
R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Search,SearchAssistant =
R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Search,CustomizeSearch =
R1 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings,ProxyServer = :0
R0 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Toolbar,LinksFolderName =
R3 - URLSearchHook: (no name) - *{CFBFAE00-17A6-11D0-99CB-00C04FD64497} - (no file)
R3 - URLSearchHook: AVG Security Toolbar BHO - {A3BC75A2-1F87-4686-AA43-5347D756017C} - C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG8\Toolbar\IEToolbar.dll
F2 - REG:system.ini: UserInit=userinit.exe
O1 - Hosts: ::1 localhost
O2 - BHO: AcroIEHelperStub - {18DF081C-E8AD-4283-A596-FA578C2EBDC3} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\Acrobat\ActiveX\AcroIEHelperShim.dll
O2 - BHO: WormRadar.com IESiteBlocker.NavFilter - {3CA2F312-6F6E-4B53-A66E-4E65E497C8C0} - C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG8\avgssie.dll
O2 - BHO: Spybot-S&D IE Protection - {53707962-6F74-2D53-2644-206D7942484F} - C:\PROGRA~2\SPYBOT~1\SDHelper.dll
O2 - BHO: (no name) - {5C255C8A-E604-49b4-9D64-90988571CECB} - (no file)
O2 - BHO: Windows Live Sign-in Helper - {9030D464-4C02-4ABF-8ECC-5164760863C6} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Windows Live\WindowsLiveLogin.dll
O2 - BHO: AVG Security Toolbar BHO - {A3BC75A2-1F87-4686-AA43-5347D756017C} - C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG8\Toolbar\IEToolbar.dll
O2 - BHO: Java(tm) Plug-In 2 SSV Helper - {DBC80044-A445-435b-BC74-9C25C1C588A9} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre6\bin\jp2ssv.dll
O3 - Toolbar: AVG Security Toolbar - {CCC7A320-B3CA-4199-B1A6-9F516DD69829} - C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG8\Toolbar\IEToolbar.dll
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [AVG8_TRAY] C:\PROGRA~2\AVG\AVG8\avgtray.exe
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Ad-Watch] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Lavasoft\Ad-Aware\AAWTray.exe"
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe Reader Speed Launcher] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe"
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [QuickTime Task] "C:\Program Files (x86)\QuickTime\qttask.exe" -atboottime
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [DeathAdder] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Razer\DeathAdder\razerhid.exe"
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [SunJavaUpdateSched] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre6\bin\jusched.exe"
O4 - HKCU\..\Run: [NVIDIA nTune] "C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\nTune\nTuneCmd.exe" clear
O4 - HKUS\S-1-5-19\..\Run: [Sidebar] %ProgramFiles%\Windows Sidebar\Sidebar.exe /detectMem (User 'LOCAL SERVICE')
O4 - HKUS\S-1-5-19\..\Run: [WindowsWelcomeCenter] rundll32.exe oobefldr.dll,ShowWelcomeCenter (User 'LOCAL SERVICE')
O4 - HKUS\S-1-5-20\..\Run: [Sidebar] %ProgramFiles%\Windows Sidebar\Sidebar.exe /detectMem (User 'NETWORK SERVICE')
O8 - Extra context menu item: E&xport to Microsoft Excel - res://C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~2\OFFICE11\EXCEL.EXE/3000
O9 - Extra button: Research - {92780B25-18CC-41C8-B9BE-3C9C571A8263} - C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~2\OFFICE11\REFIEBAR.DLL
O9 - Extra button: (no name) - {DFB852A3-47F8-48C4-A200-58CAB36FD2A2} - C:\PROGRA~2\SPYBOT~1\SDHelper.dll
O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitem: Spybot - Search & Destroy Configuration - {DFB852A3-47F8-48C4-A200-58CAB36FD2A2} - C:\PROGRA~2\SPYBOT~1\SDHelper.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O10 - Unknown file in Winsock LSP: c:\windows\system32\nvlsp.dll
O13 - Gopher Prefix:
O16 - DPF: {02BF25D5-8C17-4B23-BC80-D3488ABDDC6B} (QuickTime Object) - http://appldnld.apple.com.edgesuite.net/content.info.apple.com/QuickTime/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab
O16 - DPF: {1663ed61-23eb-11d2-b92f-008048fdd814} (MeadCo ScriptX Basic) - http://armada.da-desk.com/scriptx/ScriptX.cab
O16 - DPF: {1E54D648-B804-468d-BC78-4AFFED8E262E} (System Requirements Lab) - http://www.nvidia.com/content/DriverDownload/srl/3.0.0.0/srl_bin/sysreqlab3.cab
O16 - DPF: {1E54D648-B804-468d-BC78-4AFFED8E262F} (System Requirements Lab) - http://www.nvidia.com/content/DriverDownload/srl/3.0.0.4/srl_bin/sysreqlab_nvd.cab
O16 - DPF: {4871A87A-BFDD-4106-8153-FFDE2BAC2967} (DLM Control) - http://dlm.tools.akamai.com/dlmanager/versions/activex/dlm-activex-2.2.4.8.cab
O16 - DPF: {73ECB3AA-4717-450C-A2AB-D00DAD9EE203} (GMNRev Class) - http://h20270.www2.hp.com/ediags/gmn2/install/HPProductDetection.cab
O16 - DPF: {74DBCB52-F298-4110-951D-AD2FF67BC8AB} (NVIDIA Smart Scan) - http://www.nvidia.com/content/DriverDownload/nforce/NvidiaSmartScan.cab
O16 - DPF: {9A57B18E-2F5D-11D5-8997-00104BD12D94} (compid Class) - http://support.gateway.com/support/serialharvest/gwCID.CAB
O16 - DPF: {D27CDB6E-AE6D-11CF-96B8-444553540000} (Shockwave Flash Object) - http://fpdownload2.macromedia.com/get/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab
O17 - HKLM\System\CCS\Services\Tcpip\..\{02810641-70B5-411F-B3B0-7B70A36C2F68}: NameServer = 68.87.68.162,68.87.74.162
O17 - HKLM\System\CS1\Services\Tcpip\..\{02810641-70B5-411F-B3B0-7B70A36C2F68}: NameServer = 68.87.68.162,68.87.74.162
O17 - HKLM\System\CS2\Services\Tcpip\..\{02810641-70B5-411F-B3B0-7B70A36C2F68}: NameServer = 68.87.68.162,68.87.74.162
O18 - Protocol: linkscanner - {F274614C-63F8-47D5-A4D1-FBDDE494F8D1} - C:\Program Files (x86)\AVG\AVG8\avgpp.dll
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\Alg.exe,-112 (ALG) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\System32\alg.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: ASP.NET State Service (aspnet_state) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_state.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: AVG Free8 WatchDog (avg8wd) - AVG Technologies CZ, s.r.o. - C:\PROGRA~2\AVG\AVG8\avgwdsvc.exe
O23 - Service: @dfsrres.dll,-101 (DFSR) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\DFSR.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: ForceWare Intelligent Application Manager (IAM) - Unknown owner - C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NetworkAccessManager\bin32\nSvcAppFlt.exe
O23 - Service: InstallDriver Table Manager (IDriverT) - Macrovision Corporation - C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\InstallShield\Driver\11\Intel 32\IDriverT.exe
O23 - Service: @keyiso.dll,-100 (KeyIso) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: Lavasoft Ad-Aware Service - Lavasoft - C:\Program Files (x86)\Lavasoft\Ad-Aware\AAWService.exe
O23 - Service: @comres.dll,-2797 (MSDTC) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\System32\msdtc.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\System32\netlogon.dll,-102 (Netlogon) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: ForceWare IP service (nSvcIp) - Unknown owner - C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NetworkAccessManager\bin32\nSvcIp.exe
O23 - Service: nTune Service (nTuneService) - NVIDIA - C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\nTune\nTuneService.exe
O23 - Service: NVIDIA Display Driver Service (nvsvc) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\nvvsvc.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: PnkBstrA - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\PnkBstrA.exe
O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\psbase.dll,-300 (ProtectedStorage) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\Locator.exe,-2 (RpcLocator) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\locator.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\samsrv.dll,-1 (SamSs) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: SBSD Security Center Service (SBSDWSCService) - Safer Networking Ltd. - C:\Program Files (x86)\Spybot - Search & Destroy\SDWinSec.exe
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\SLsvc.exe,-101 (slsvc) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\SLsvc.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\snmptrap.exe,-3 (SNMPTRAP) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\System32\snmptrap.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\spoolsv.exe,-1 (Spooler) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\System32\spoolsv.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: Steam Client Service - Valve Corporation - C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Steam\SteamService.exe
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\ui0detect.exe,-101 (UI0Detect) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\UI0Detect.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\vds.exe,-100 (vds) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\System32\vds.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\vssvc.exe,-102 (VSS) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\vssvc.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%Systemroot%\system32\wbem\wmiapsrv.exe,-110 (wmiApSrv) - Unknown owner - C:\Windows\system32\wbem\WmiApSrv.exe (file missing)
O23 - Service: @%ProgramFiles%\Windows Media Player\wmpnetwk.exe,-101 (WMPNetworkSvc) - Unknown owner - C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Media Player\wmpnetwk.exe (file missing)

--
End of file - 10267 bytes


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 04, 2009, 07:14:40 AM
The BHO entires are your IE plugins, and you have a bunch of them that could be slowing it down while it launches. Try disabling some of them and see which ones are causing your comp to freeze up during the launch process.

Running multiple anti-virus/anti-spyware programs is also a good way to slow things down in general as each time something has to be checked it has to be checked multiple times.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 04, 2009, 07:59:26 AM
Thanks, man.

So nothing else looks out of the ordinary?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 04, 2009, 08:15:34 AM
You do have a bunch of stuff being loaded on startup which is presumably slowing down your boot process. As I mentioned above you have a bunch of anti-spyware/anti-virus stuff running so if you want to speed up your boot process you should probably start by disabling some of those to see which might be taking a while to load.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 04, 2009, 09:22:25 AM
Thing is, none of it is 'new'.  Its all stuff I loaded on (or was loaded on) within the first week of my last install.  But it was never a problem until the last week or so.

Oh well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 04, 2009, 09:57:52 AM
SnakeCharmer,

I noticed that you're using Razer software for either keyboard or mouse. I would look at that for a moment, simply because just last night, my Razer Lycosa keyboard started to act up. Essentially, it was sending a 'launch windows media player' signal continuously. It also disabled my 'w' key. I uninstalled the software, and its now running just fine, albeit without the preset functionalities, which I wasn't using in any case.

Its just a hunch, but the software seems pretty crappy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 04, 2009, 11:23:02 AM
Razer mouse and Logitech G15 keyboard. 

But your right, the Razer software absolutely blows ass.  If you install the mouse in one USB port, then move it to another, it won't work and/or it will trip fatal errors on start up.  Only reason I haven't replaced them with something else is that they were too damned expensive just to toss aside.  The only reason I use the G15 is for the illuminated keyboard, and it was one of the few choices I had at the time that offered that.  About the only thing the LCD screen is good for is keeping up with people in ventrillo or teamspeak.  I think I've used the programmable G keys once?  Yeah.  Waste of a 100 bucks.

Anyway, I've heard/read that if you try and upgrade your Razer firmware, you stand a better than average chance of bricking the damn thing  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on July 04, 2009, 11:24:14 AM
I've never installed anything for a Razer mouse. Makes me wonder if you still have software on your computer that it came with.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 05, 2009, 08:27:41 PM
HAELP!  :ye_gods:

A few weeks ago, my computer started to behave stranger than usual. All of a sudden, he would just do something that looks like a hardware reset to me.

No error message, everything runs just fine, suddenly my screen goes black, the pc shuts down completely (in less than a second, as if somebody had pulled the plug/switched of power) and fires back up after a few seconds.

Eventviewer shows the same error everytime this happens. (in german, I try to translate)

"Loading of the following Boot- or Systemstartdriver failed.

To recieve further information click http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp"

Data () Bytes() Words
[Empty, grayed out box]

It might be something heat related because it happens less and less often, the LONGER the PC is running non-stop.

It does not seem to matter if I am browsing the internet, use open office or play prototype.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 05, 2009, 08:47:11 PM
Thing is, none of it is 'new'.  Its all stuff I loaded on (or was loaded on) within the first week of my last install.  But it was never a problem until the last week or so.

Oh well.
Some of the anti-spyware/anti-virus stuff may be taking more time at startup if they are scanning things on startup. E.g. if they are scanning some folders at startup, and those folders are slowly filling up as time goes by, then it'll take them longer to finish their startup procedure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 05, 2009, 08:51:58 PM
HAELP!  :ye_gods:

A few weeks ago, my computer started to behave stranger than usual. All of a sudden, he would just do something that looks like a hardware reset to me.

No error message, everything runs just fine, suddenly my screen goes black, the pc shuts down completely (in less than a second, as if somebody had pulled the plug/switched of power) and fires back up after a few seconds.

Eventviewer shows the same error everytime this happens. (in german, I try to translate)

"Loading of the following Boot- or Systemstartdriver failed.

To recieve further information click http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp"

Data () Bytes() Words
[Empty, grayed out box]

It might be something heat related because it happens less and less often, the LONGER the PC is running non-stop.

It does not seem to matter if I am browsing the internet, use open office or play prototype.
What are your system specs?

Is the computer restarting on its own like you had pressed the hardware reset button? Or is it turning off and you are manually powering it back on?

Are you using an UPS?

Post the error message in the original German (more accurate to Google on that).

The normal thermal shutdown procedure will give you message on startup and put an entry in the log file so it doesn't sound like that is happening though you should get a temperature monitoring program just to see what's going on inside the case.

My guess right now is you have bad RAM.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 05, 2009, 10:07:25 PM
My guess right now is you have bad RAM.
Hm, could a loose RAM bank be the cause of this ? I think I remember I had a little bit of trouble installing the last one, 3 banks of 1Gb Ram atm. It is as if I had hit the "manual reset" button.



Temperature GPU is around 55°C, CPU 1 + 2 are at 50°C


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 05, 2009, 10:33:49 PM
My guess right now is you have bad RAM.
Hm, could a loose RAM bank be the cause of this ? I think I remember I had a little bit of trouble installing the last one, 3 banks of 1Gb Ram atm. It is as if I had hit the "manual reset" button.
Sure this sort of "random" crash, if it isn't temperature related, is definitely a symptom of bad RAM or faulty RAM slots/motherboard.

Check your "System Failure" settings (under XP it's right-click My Computer -> Properties -> Advanced -> Startup Recovery Settings) and uncheck the "automatically" restart option. That should hopefully give you a BSoD instead of rebooting your machine and you might get a more informative display about where the error occurred.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 05, 2009, 11:46:56 PM
Check your "System Failure" settings (under XP it's right-click My Computer -> Properties -> Advanced -> Startup Recovery Settings) and uncheck the "automatically" restart option. That should hopefully give you a BSoD instead of rebooting your machine and you might get a more informative display about where the error occurred.
Did that already, did not change a thing, I doubt the reboot is windows related, I am still suprised though that I don't get an error message because windows was shut down unexpectedly when I reboot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 06, 2009, 12:20:37 AM
Check your "System Failure" settings (under XP it's right-click My Computer -> Properties -> Advanced -> Startup Recovery Settings) and uncheck the "automatically" restart option. That should hopefully give you a BSoD instead of rebooting your machine and you might get a more informative display about where the error occurred.
Did that already, did not change a thing, I doubt the reboot is windows related, I am still suprised though that I don't get an error message because windows was shut down unexpectedly when I reboot.
I would say there's a good chance your motherboard is screwed up somehow, then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 06, 2009, 08:19:06 AM
Wouldn't hurt to download and burn a CD of Ultimate Boot CD (http://www.ultimatebootcd.com/) and then running Memtest86 or Windows Memory Test. Then you may also want to run some of their disk health tools, just in case what you have is a intermittently failing hard drive.

It could also be a failing power supply. Its a bit hard to tell.

Just to eliminate Windows from the equation, it may be worth grabbing an old hard drive, if you have it, and installing Ubuntu on it, and playing in that environment for a while, just browsing the web, playing Mahjong or whatever, to see if the crash occurs then. If it does, then you either have something wonky with Windows (unlikely, but you never know) or your HD is failing in an unusual, but not entirely impossible way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 06, 2009, 09:46:58 AM
Power supply, RAM, or motherboard.  I lean towards power supply based on what you've told us, but they can all have similar symptoms.  Given there's no blue screen after turning on the option, I don't think it's Windows or software related.

Do you have a UPS?  How have outside temperatures been compared to normal?  If the power grid is under load you might be getting brown outs and they're just enough to starve your computer so it shuts down.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 06, 2009, 09:53:37 AM
Odd question, but anyone got a suggestion for how to fix a button on a PS3 controller that seems to be sticking?  The "X" button seems to be randomly getting stuck when I press it down.  Makes action games a bit difficult to play. These controllers aren't cheap either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on July 06, 2009, 03:06:20 PM
I had one (circle) that was sticking, cleaned around it with some 91% alcohol, blew it out with compressed air. Been working fine so far, but my ps3 gets very light use.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on July 06, 2009, 03:07:34 PM
Odd question, but anyone got a suggestion for how to fix a button on a PS3 controller that seems to be sticking?  The "X" button seems to be randomly getting stuck when I press it down.  Makes action games a bit difficult to play. These controllers aren't cheap either.
Less of one of the following:

1. Pizza
2. Cheetohs
3. Maple Syrup


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 06, 2009, 03:30:00 PM
I ran Memtestfor a few hours without any errors, will leave it running longer when I do not need the Computer.

My power supply just barely meets the requirements of my installed devices. I plan on upgrading it anyway.

fakeedit: Just to clarify. I build this thing myself with an cpu/mb upgradekit and spare parts. It was (and still is) my first time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 06, 2009, 08:43:39 PM
Meets the reqs in Amperage, or Wattage?

PSUs are a funny thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 07, 2009, 03:11:09 AM
Meets the reqs in Amperage, or Wattage?

PSUs are a funny thing.

Wattage, amperage is fine. I think.  :uhrr:

Wattage is a real word ? Funny.  :awesome_for_real:

edit: found something new

I just downloaded PC Alert4.

Upon starting it gave me a warning that something that should be running on ~5 Volt is running on 3,26V.

How likely is it that I connected something wrong ? And is there any way of indentifying which one ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on July 07, 2009, 07:06:04 AM
Anyone know if there's a way to get the Windows 7 hotkeys into Windows XP? Unfortunately my work laptop is only allowed to have XP on it. I'm really just looking for the ability to quickly put 2 windows side by side. Windows key left and right would normally do that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on July 07, 2009, 07:07:12 AM
Windows key left and right would normally do that.

What's a Windows Key?

AND WHY ARE THERE 2 OF THEM?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on July 07, 2009, 07:42:46 AM
You're a jerk. Windows key + left or right. Happy now?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on July 07, 2009, 07:54:15 AM
You're a jerk. Windows key + left or right. Happy now?

WHAT'S A WINDOWS KEY OH GOD IS IT SOMETHING NEW

?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on July 07, 2009, 07:59:31 AM
Have I told you lately you're a douche?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 07, 2009, 11:09:14 AM
Upon starting it gave me a warning that something that should be running on ~5 Volt is running on 3,26V.

How likely is it that I connected something wrong ?
Zero, unless you somehow converted a serial ATA power connector into a molex connector. The only connectors that provided +3.3V power are the motherboard connector and the serial ATA ones. Everything else is +5V and/or +12V.

Quote
And is there any way of indentifying which one ?
A lot of connectors are supposed to provide +5V power (motherboard connector, molex connectors, serial ATA connectors) so if that program is correct (never used it before) and a cable is wired wrong or the power supply isn't supplying the proper voltage it might take some time to track down the problem.

Here's an example of how the connectors in an ATX power supply are wired:

http://www.pcpower.com/downloads/turbo_cool_specs1200-ESA_new_3854.pdf


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 07, 2009, 11:30:41 AM
Some BIOS have a feature where your voltage on your various rails is measured. You may want to have a peek in BIOS to see if it has that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on July 07, 2009, 11:58:34 AM
Can you tell us what PSU you have currently Helm?  It really sounds like you have a less then great one which is a big mistake people make when they build a rig.  Always spend top dollar and go namebrand on the PSU.  Always.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 07, 2009, 02:30:35 PM
Can you tell us what PSU you have currently Helm?  It really sounds like you have a less then great one which is a big mistake people make when they build a rig.  Always spend top dollar and go namebrand on the PSU.  Always.
Not without ripping it out of the case, I think.

In other news, I had a look at my motherboard, took the ram out, put it back in, enabled something in the BIOS.

Now 4Gb of Ram are detected, Windows now detects 3 Gb (which is normal for some boards, I heard) and I am waiting for the first crash.

Another semi-related issue is if I should switch to Vista Home 64bit.I could buy it at a nice discount. Looks like there are 64bit drivers avaible for all my stuff.

Btw, my specs are

Motherboard Name   ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35
CPU                          DualCore Intel Core 2 Duo E7200, 2533 MHz (9.5 x 267)
RAM                          4 X    DDR2-800 (400 MHz)

semi-edit: Thanks for the help, guys  :heart:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 07, 2009, 04:21:21 PM
Just get W7 for free for the next year.  Trumps even a heavily discounted V64.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on July 07, 2009, 04:56:42 PM
Ok got a slightly annoying problem here. I did a reinstall of XP on a new HDD since I think the old one may have been moving towards death. I've now got startup issues, primarily I'll get the Bios flash screen and instead of going to bootup information it'll restart (or not). It seems pretty random about whether it does it or not. I think the longest series so far was about 10 minutes of flash screen on for 10-20 seconds followed by reboot. On top of that I've got a problem that isn't new but seems a bit more frequent that XP will freeze on the loading screen while it's fading in (so I've got a dark rendition of the XP loading screen frozen). These two combined meant last time I was booting up it took half an hour (which is the worst it's been, normally it's up and running in at least 15 minutes). Nothing seems to be running slowly and I'm not sure how to check for error messages (especially on the Bios bit) it just either restarts or freezes.

Also I don't think it's related but since I've done this fresh install NTLDR gets reported as missing at boot. Tried fixing it with fixboot and chkdsk (which comes back clean) and tried copying the NTLDR files but nothing seemed to work. It does boot up fine as long as I've got an XP disk in the drive so haven't really looked into that one much more.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 08, 2009, 08:24:36 AM
The hanging at BIOS suggests that the motherboard is struggling with hardware.

You should be able to disable the BIOS flash screen from within BIOS. Poke about in there and you should find it.

Try booting without the new HD. Try booting with only one memory stick, then the other. If any of those relieve the hang, do it again, at least 2 more times, to be sure you've nailed the offending hardware.

NTLDR reported as missing suggests somethings' amiss with the new hard drive, but it may also be something wrong with RAM. The inability for a system to load stuff into RAM can sometimes manifest itself as 'missing' or 'corrupt' files, when in fact the files are just fine on the hard drive, its their transport to bad RAM that  makes them look missing or corrupt. The system just doesn't know how to tell you that.

Lastly, burn a copy of Ultimate Boot CD and do mem tests and HD tests if any of the above is inconclusive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 08, 2009, 10:08:18 AM
Did you install on a new hard drive but leave the old one in?  It's using the old one for the boot record if you didn't physically redorder the bad drives or pull the suspect one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 08, 2009, 11:10:40 PM
Oh, btw, thanks to the folks who helped me a while back with Dreamweaver SFTP and ssh config on FreeBSD. Your direction was correct; PAM doesn't work with Dreamweaver 8, and you need to manually tell sshd to do password authentication.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on July 09, 2009, 03:06:06 PM
Question: Co-worker just got a Dell Precision M4400 laptop. Thing has 4gb of RAM in it but is running WinXP SP3 32-bit. The machine only registers 3.45gb, but that it recognized even that much surprised me. I thought the 32bit OSes wouldn't go over 2gb? At least, that's what I thought from a few months back when I tried to put 4gb on my then-mobo with WinXP (was Asus A7N266C now Asus (P5N-T Deluxe).

So, running WinXP 32bit, could I now be running almost 3.5gb?

But your right, the Razer software absolutely blows ass. 

I agree. So I don't use them. I have the Razer keyboard and mouse. I like them both for performance and really don't care at all what the software has. The computer just sees them as a keyboard and mouse, never asked me to install special drivers, and so after wiping the drive, I never bother. They work just as a keyboard and mouse.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 09, 2009, 04:06:19 PM
The 2 gig limitation is about WinXP SP1 and below and initial installation before patching, which often freaked out if you had more than 2 gig.

After patching to SP2,  you can put in more ram, up to 4 gigs in 32 bit OS.

4 gigl total for 32. 512 or so is reserved for windows OS and devices, plus video card memory is subtracted from the total, hence you only see 3.45. From somewhere else, in nerdish: (http://www.tech-forums.net/pc/f9/difference-between-32-bit-x86-64-bit-x64-171390/#post1349279)
Quote
Registers in x86 PCs are limited to 32 bits, which means the biggest number that can be stored in that register is 2^32, or 4,294,967,296; which means that the CPU can access up to "ADDRESS 4,294,967,296" which is the 4th GB of data.

The problem is that the CPU also access I/O devices (printer, USB, keyboard, mouse, monitor, etc.) by assigning them an address as well. So it reserves half a GB or so of the memory addresses to talk to the I/O devices... So you have 4GB - ~0.5GB -> 3.5 GB (on Windows it is 3.2GB).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on July 09, 2009, 07:00:05 PM
Ah! Ok so if I ever wipe the drive again, I need to remove the extra sticks, reinstall XP, let it patch to SP3, then reinstall the third and fourth gig. I'll remember that. Thanks Engels.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 03:35:43 AM
*sighs*

Thought I had solved my problem but apparenty the loose ram-sticks were not the problem...  :uhrr:

Right now my theory is, that something is wron with my power supply. After a little bit of research, I found out that I have a really shitty PSU.

Here is what I know:

Type: LC-B400-Atx

Output: 400 W +12v= 20A (this seems to be important, but I don't know enough to understand why.

Here is what I am running atm.

CPU Typ   DualCore Intel Core 2 Duo E7200, 2533 MHz (9.5 x 267)
Motherboard Name   ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35  (3 PCI, 2 PCI-E x16, 4 DDR2 DIMM, 2 DDR3 DIMM, Audio, Gigabit LAN)
DIMM1: Team Group Team-Value-800   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-15 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-10 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-8 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM2: Kingston KTC1G-UDIMM   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-18 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-12 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-9 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM3: Team Group Team-Value-800   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-15 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-10 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-8 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM4: Kingston KTC1G-UDIMM   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-18 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-12 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-9 @ 200 MHz)

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT  (512 MB)
Realtek ALC888/1200 @ Intel 82801IB ICH9 - High Definition Audio Controller [A-2]

Hd1: ExcelStor Technology J8160  (153 GB, IDE)
Hd2: SAMSUNG SP1203N  (120 GB, 7200 RPM, Ultra-ATA/133)

AVM FRITZ!WLAN USB Stick  (192.168.178.20)
Microsoft IntelliMouse Explorer (USB)

Right now I am planning to upgrade to  a stonger PSU, something like 500w output, +12v=40A and 80+ certified if memory serves me right.
And a new Sata HD, so I can run my IDE DVD-Drives again. :-)

Untill then I read it might be worth a try to increase Vcore (slowly, step by step) to increase system stability. Is this dangerous ?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 07:50:00 AM
Untill then I read it might be worth a try to increase Vcore (slowly, step by step) to increase system stability. Is this dangerous ?
Yes.

What are your RAM timings set at in your BIOS?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 07:55:06 AM
Untill then I read it might be worth a try to increase Vcore (slowly, step by step) to increase system stability. Is this dangerous ?
Yes.

What are your RAM timings set at in your BIOS?

CPU-Z read this...

Northbridge   Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2
Southbridge   Intel 82801IB (ICH9) rev. 02
Graphic Interface   PCI-Express
PCI-E Link Width   x16
PCI-E Max Link Width   x16
Memory Type   DDR2
Memory Size   4096 MBytes
Memory Frequency   333.4 MHz (4:5)
CAS# Latency (tCL)   5.0 clocks
RAS# to CAS# (tRCD)   5 clocks
RAS# Precharge (tRP)   5 clocks
Cycle Time (tRAS)   15 clocks
Command Rate (CR)   2T


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:08:08 AM
What is your FSB and RAM frequency set to in your BIOS? You have a strange setup if you are really running your RAM at 667 MHz (double the rate of the reported frequency in CPU-Z). Your timings may also be wrong since it's using the faster of your pairs' timings rather than the slowest.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 08:22:57 AM
What is your FSB and RAM frequency set to in your BIOS? You have a strange setup if you are really running your RAM at 667 MHz (double the rate of the reported frequency in CPU-Z).
Hm. Will have a look, but where did you get the 667 Mhz from ?

Quote
Your timings may also be wrong since it's using the faster of your pairs' timings rather than the slowest.
I was under the impression that both ram pairs were of the same speed. They are not ?

edit: Ah. DDR2 at 333 Mhz = 667 Mhz ? BIOS setting was on [Auto] is now on [400]
edit2: Also noticed that my bios setting for the graphic adapter was set to PCI, changed it to PCIe





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:32:32 AM
What is your FSB and RAM frequency set to in your BIOS? You have a strange setup if you are really running your RAM at 667 MHz (double the rate of the reported frequency in CPU-Z).
Hm. Will have a look, but where did you get the 667 Mhz from ?
For DDR RAM the memory bus speed is half the data rate. So if CPU-Z is reporting 333 MHz and assuming that's accurate then you are running your RAM as DDR(2)-667.

Quote
Quote
Your timings may also be wrong since it's using the faster of your pairs' timings rather than the slowest.
I was under the impression that both ram pairs were of the same speed. They are not ?
Quote
DIMM1: Team Group Team-Value-800   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-15 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-10 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-8 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM2: Kingston KTC1G-UDIMM   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-18 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-12 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-9 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM3: Team Group Team-Value-800   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-15 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-10 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-8 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM4: Kingston KTC1G-UDIMM   1 GB DDR2-800 DDR2 SDRAM  (5-5-5-18 @ 400 MHz)  (4-4-4-12 @ 266 MHz)  (3-3-3-9 @ 200 MHz)
The Team Group timings are different than the Kingston ones.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:33:28 AM
edit: Ah. DDR2 at 333 Mhz = 667 Mhz ? BIOS setting was on [Auto] is now on [400]
edit2: Also noticed that my bios setting for the graphic adapter was set to PCI, changed it to PCIe
What is your FSB set to?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:37:19 AM
edit: Ah. DDR2 at 333 Mhz = 667 Mhz ? BIOS setting was on [Auto] is now on [400]
Change your RAM timings to 5-5-5-18 then (to match your slowest timings).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 08:40:35 AM
edit: Ah. DDR2 at 333 Mhz = 667 Mhz ? BIOS setting was on [Auto] is now on [400]
edit2: Also noticed that my bios setting for the graphic adapter was set to PCI, changed it to PCIe
What is your FSB set to?


That is Front size bus, right ? Could not find it in the BIOS, Everest reports : actual 327 MHz (DDR) / effective 653 MHz


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 08:42:15 AM
edit: Ah. DDR2 at 333 Mhz = 667 Mhz ? BIOS setting was on [Auto] is now on [400]
Change your RAM timings to 5-5-5-18 then (to match your slowest timings).

Will try that.

just found out that changing "DRAM frequency" in the bios and saving the settings immediatly causes the same "reset effect" that is my problem


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:51:57 AM
edit: Ah. DDR2 at 333 Mhz = 667 Mhz ? BIOS setting was on [Auto] is now on [400]
edit2: Also noticed that my bios setting for the graphic adapter was set to PCI, changed it to PCIe
What is your FSB set to?
That is Front size bus, right ? Could not find it in the BIOS, Everest reports : actual 327 MHz (DDR) / effective 653 MHz
Front Side Bus. You need a new motherboard -- your MB requires the use of jumpers for certain FSB/memory bus speed combinations :uhrr:

Turn off Speedstep in your BIOS and then check your FSB speed in CPU-Z. What is it reporting?

just found out that changing "DRAM frequency" in the bios and saving the settings immediatly causes the same "reset effect" that is my problem
Take out your RAM and verify that the part numbers are in fact what you ordered.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 08:52:21 AM
Change your RAM timings to 5-5-5-18 then (to match your slowest timings).
Would that be the following settings ?

DRAM CAS# Latency
         RAS to CAS
         Precharge
         Activate to Precharge

All are set to [auto] atm.

"Active to Precharge" has no "18" setting, maximum is 15.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:57:51 AM
Would that be the following settings ?

DRAM CAS# Latency
         RAS to CAS
         Precharge
         Activate to Precharge

All are set to [auto] atm.

"Active to Precharge" has no "18" setting, maximum is 15.
They are in the same order they are spec'd on the RAM. I.e. 5, 5, 5, 15 or 18. If you can't set Activate to Precharge to 18 then take out your Kingston RAM and see if you still have the reset problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 09:06:02 AM
just found out that changing "DRAM frequency" in the bios and saving the settings immediatly causes the same "reset effect" that is my problem
You are going to have to check the jumpers on your motherboard. Reference page 11 and page 26 in your manual and report back on the positions of the FSB1, FSB2, and FSB3 jumpers. The crappy manual doesn't say what the jumpers should be set to for a FSB of 1066 (what your CPU needs) and a memory speed of 800 (what your RAM needs) but I'm assuming the jumpers should all be in their default "1_2" positions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 10, 2009, 09:13:11 AM
Oh, btw, thanks to the folks who helped me a while back with Dreamweaver SFTP and ssh config on FreeBSD. Your direction was correct; PAM doesn't work with Dreamweaver 8, and you need to manually tell sshd to do password authentication.

I am very happy that, for once, I was able to help out with something that I know about rather than making educated guesses.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 01:32:49 PM
just found out that changing "DRAM frequency" in the bios and saving the settings immediatly causes the same "reset effect" that is my problem
You are going to have to check the jumpers on your motherboard. Reference page 11 and page 26 in your manual and report back on the positions of the FSB1, FSB2, and FSB3 jumpers. The crappy manual doesn't say what the jumpers should be set to for a FSB of 1066 (what your CPU needs) and a memory speed of 800 (what your RAM needs) but I'm assuming the jumpers should all be in their default "1_2" positions.

Great. Jumpers are BELOW the fan of the graphic card.

Set as follows

[X][X][][][]FSB2
[X][X][][][]FSB3
[X][X][]FSB1

Which should be the default setting. *shrugs*

I tried setting the FSB to the correct size for my CPU. Did not work, windows did not even start up. Setup showed a fixed DRAM frequecy of 533/DDR2 which I could not adjust at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2009, 02:32:29 PM
How I miss jumpers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 03:27:30 PM
How I miss jumpers.
Wan't to trade motherboards ?   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 04:54:19 PM
You are going to have to check the jumpers on your motherboard. Reference page 11 and page 26 in your manual and report back on the positions of the FSB1, FSB2, and FSB3 jumpers. The crappy manual doesn't say what the jumpers should be set to for a FSB of 1066 (what your CPU needs) and a memory speed of 800 (what your RAM needs) but I'm assuming the jumpers should all be in their default "1_2" positions.
Great. Jumpers are BELOW the fan of the graphic card.

Set as follows

[X][X][][][]FSB2
[X][X][][][]FSB3
[X][X][]FSB1

Which should be the default setting. *shrugs*

I tried setting the FSB to the correct size for my CPU. Did not work, windows did not even start up.
:facepalm:

Is your BIOS up-to-date? I wonder if there is something obvious we are missing here. It's hard to believe a P35 motherboard is doing such a bad job of auto-detecting the hardware installed.

Did you turn off Speedstep in the BIOS and check the auto-detect CPU settings in CPU-Z (FSB, multiplier, etc.)?

Quote
Setup showed a fixed DRAM frequecy of 533/DDR2 which I could not adjust at all.
Okay that's different than the 333 MHz CPU-Z was reporting earlier. Is CPU-Z now showing 533 as well? That would imply you are trying to run your RAM as DDR2-1066, which makes sense since that's what your CPU's FSB should be set (but you still haven't said if that's what it's running at).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 06:02:08 PM
Thanks for all your help, man.


:facepalm:

Is your BIOS up-to-date? I wonder if there is something obvious we are missing here. It's hard to believe a P35 motherboard is doing such a bad job of auto-detecting the hardware installed.

Did you turn off Speedstep in the BIOS and check the auto-detect CPU settings in CPU-Z (FSB, multiplier, etc.)?

Quote
Setup showed a fixed DRAM frequecy of 533/DDR2 which I could not adjust at all.
Okay that's different than the 333 MHz CPU-Z was reporting earlier. Is CPU-Z now showing 533 as well? That would imply you are trying to run your RAM as DDR2-1066, which makes sense since that's what your CPU's FSB should be set (but you still haven't said if that's what it's running at).
I might not have been clear, when I changed the jumpers, windows would not load, at all. So I did set them back to default.

I will look for a Bios Update.

I ripped out the OEM RAM and now have only 2 Gbyte Samsung Ram installed (my father had some lying around). I was able to adjust the BIOS settings for those RAM sticks but I had to lower them to 333 Mhz 5-5-5-15 instead of 400 Mhz (auto).

Speedstep is off.

This is my CPU-Z Dump:


Processors Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Processor 1 (ID = 0)
Number of cores      2 (max 2)
Number of threads   2 (max 2)
Name         Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
Codename      Wolfdale
Specification      Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E7200  @ 2.53GHz
Package         Socket 775 LGA (platform ID = 0h)
CPUID         6.7.6
Extended CPUID      6.17
Core Stepping      M0
Technology      45 nm
Core Speed      2482.5 MHz (9.5 x 261.3 MHz)
Rated Bus speed      1045.3 MHz
Stock frequency      2533 MHz
Instructions sets   MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T
L1 Data cache      2 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L1 Instruction cache   2 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache      3072 KBytes, 12-way set associative, 64-byte line size
FID/VID Control      yes
FID range      6.0x - 9.5x
max VID         1.163 V
Features      

Chipset
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Northbridge      Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2
Southbridge      Intel 82801IB (ICH9) rev. 02
Graphic Interface   PCI-Express
PCI-E Link Width   x16
PCI-E Max Link Width   x16
Memory Type      DDR2
Memory Size      2048 MBytes
Channels      Dual (Symmetric)
Memory Frequency   326.6 MHz (4:5)
CAS#         5.0
RAS# to CAS#      5
RAS# Precharge      5
Cycle Time (tRAS)   15
Command Rate      2T

Memory SPD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIMM #1

General
Memory type      DDR2
Module format      Regular UDIMM
Manufacturer (ID)   Samsung (CE00000000000000)
Size         1024 MBytes
Max bandwidth      PC2-6400 (400 MHz)
Part number      M3 78T2863QZS-CF7
Serial number      647E65B8
Manufacturing date   Week 48/Year 08

Attributes
Number of banks      1
Data width      64 bits
Correction      None
Nominal Voltage      1.80 Volts
EPP         no
XMP         no

Timings table
Frequency (MHz)      266   333   400   
CAS#         4.0   5.0   6.0   
RAS# to CAS# delay   4   5   6   
RAS# Precharge      4   5   6   
TRAS         12   15   18   
TRC         16   20   24   

DIMM #2

General
Memory type      DDR2
Module format      Regular UDIMM
Manufacturer (ID)   Samsung (CE00000000000000)
Size         1024 MBytes
Max bandwidth      PC2-6400 (400 MHz)
Part number      M3 78T2863QZS-CF7
Serial number      8165657D
Manufacturing date   Week 45/Year 08

Attributes
Number of banks      1
Data width      64 bits
Correction      None
Nominal Voltage      1.80 Volts
EPP         no
XMP         no

Winbond W83627DHG hardware monitor

Voltage sensor 0   1.14 Volts [0x8E] (CPU VCORE)
Voltage sensor 1   12.43 Volts [0xDF] (+12V)
Voltage sensor 2   3.26 Volts [0xCC] (AVCC)
Voltage sensor 3   3.26 Volts [0xCC] (+3.3V)
Voltage sensor 4   1.24 Volts [0x9B] (VIN1)
Voltage sensor 5   5.16 Volts [0xD7] (+5V)
Voltage sensor 6   1.66 Volts [0xD0] (VIN3)
Temperature sensor 0   35°C (94°F) [0x23] (SYSTIN)
Temperature sensor 1   34°C (93°F) [0x44] (CPUTIN)
Temperature sensor 2   15°C (58°F) [0x1E] (AUXTIN)
Fan sensor 1      2344 RPM [0x48] (CPUFANIN0)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2009, 06:31:43 PM
Ok, Bios is up to date now.

Stability seems to be getting worse over time. Right now I can't even play Blood Bowl or TF2 for more than a few minutes at best.


Lots of reading on the internet seems to indicate that I have one of the worst PCUs installed that is/was avaible on the market, I think I posted the specs a bit earlier.

Shitty BIOS settings aside, how likely is this PSU related ?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 10, 2009, 08:44:15 PM
I might not have been clear, when I changed the jumpers, windows would not load, at all. So I did set them back to default.
Yes your jumpers should be on the default positions (1_2).

Quote
I will look for a Bios Update.

I ripped out the OEM RAM and now have only 2 Gbyte Samsung Ram installed (my father had some lying around). I was able to adjust the BIOS settings for those RAM sticks but I had to lower them to 333 Mhz 5-5-5-15 instead of 400 Mhz (auto).

Speedstep is off.

This is my CPU-Z Dump:


Processors Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Processor 1 (ID = 0)
Number of cores      2 (max 2)
Number of threads   2 (max 2)
Name         Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
Codename      Wolfdale
Specification      Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E7200  @ 2.53GHz
Package         Socket 775 LGA (platform ID = 0h)
CPUID         6.7.6
Extended CPUID      6.17
Core Stepping      M0
Technology      45 nm
Core Speed      2482.5 MHz (9.5 x 261.3 MHz)
Rated Bus speed      1045.3 MHz
Stock frequency      2533 MHz
Instructions sets   MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T
L1 Data cache      2 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L1 Instruction cache   2 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache      3072 KBytes, 12-way set associative, 64-byte line size
FID/VID Control      yes
FID range      6.0x - 9.5x
max VID         1.163 V
Features      

Chipset
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Northbridge      Intel P35/G33/G31 rev. A2
Southbridge      Intel 82801IB (ICH9) rev. 02
Graphic Interface   PCI-Express
PCI-E Link Width   x16
PCI-E Max Link Width   x16
Memory Type      DDR2
Memory Size      2048 MBytes
Channels      Dual (Symmetric)
Memory Frequency   326.6 MHz (4:5)
CAS#         5.0
RAS# to CAS#      5
RAS# Precharge      5
Cycle Time (tRAS)   15
Command Rate      2T

Memory SPD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIMM #1

General
Memory type      DDR2
Module format      Regular UDIMM
Manufacturer (ID)   Samsung (CE00000000000000)
Size         1024 MBytes
Max bandwidth      PC2-6400 (400 MHz)
Part number      M3 78T2863QZS-CF7
Serial number      647E65B8
Manufacturing date   Week 48/Year 08

Attributes
Number of banks      1
Data width      64 bits
Correction      None
Nominal Voltage      1.80 Volts
EPP         no
XMP         no

Timings table
Frequency (MHz)      266   333   400   
CAS#         4.0   5.0   6.0   
RAS# to CAS# delay   4   5   6   
RAS# Precharge      4   5   6   
TRAS         12   15   18   
TRC         16   20   24   

DIMM #2

General
Memory type      DDR2
Module format      Regular UDIMM
Manufacturer (ID)   Samsung (CE00000000000000)
Size         1024 MBytes
Max bandwidth      PC2-6400 (400 MHz)
Part number      M3 78T2863QZS-CF7
Serial number      8165657D
Manufacturing date   Week 45/Year 08

Attributes
Number of banks      1
Data width      64 bits
Correction      None
Nominal Voltage      1.80 Volts
EPP         no
XMP         no

Winbond W83627DHG hardware monitor

Voltage sensor 0   1.14 Volts [0x8E] (CPU VCORE)
Voltage sensor 1   12.43 Volts [0xDF] (+12V)
Voltage sensor 2   3.26 Volts [0xCC] (AVCC)
Voltage sensor 3   3.26 Volts [0xCC] (+3.3V)
Voltage sensor 4   1.24 Volts [0x9B] (VIN1)
Voltage sensor 5   5.16 Volts [0xD7] (+5V)
Voltage sensor 6   1.66 Volts [0xD0] (VIN3)
Temperature sensor 0   35°C (94°F) [0x23] (SYSTIN)
Temperature sensor 1   34°C (93°F) [0x44] (CPUTIN)
Temperature sensor 2   15°C (58°F) [0x1E] (AUXTIN)
Fan sensor 1      2344 RPM [0x48] (CPUFANIN0)
Okay I think I see what's going on here with your RAM. You would have to put in your original RAM and run the above again to confirm but I think what's happening is your MB only supports a limited range of memory timings and it's dropping the RAM frequency down because it can't support the timings of your RAM at 400 MHz (DDR2-800). If you look at the Samsung data above you can see CPU-Z is reporting 400 MHz as 6-6-6-18 and you said earlier you can't set TRAS above 15. So your Kingston RAM is probably causing the same problem as its TRAS is 18 as well which is forcing the MB to drop the RAM frequency down to 333 MHz.

At least your CPU FSB is correct at 1067 MHz (or thereabouts).

Ok, Bios is up to date now.

Stability seems to be getting worse over time. Right now I can't even play Blood Bowl or TF2 for more than a few minutes at best.


Lots of reading on the internet seems to indicate that I have one of the worst PCUs installed that is/was avaible on the market, I think I posted the specs a bit earlier.

Shitty BIOS settings aside, how likely is this PSU related ?
There's a good chance it's your PSU. I'm still suspicious of your MB, though. Power supplies tend to shut themselves off when things go bad rather than "power cycling" (i.e. rebooting themselves). MBs, though, could definitely "spontaneously" reboot the system if they are going crazy. On the other hand it's possible a voltage drop on one of the lines or other power fluctuation is actually what's triggering the MB to reboot the system. If it was me and I had the money I would replace both components.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 10, 2009, 11:11:25 PM
There's a good chance it's your PSU. I'm still suspicious of your MB, though. Power supplies tend to shut themselves off when things go bad rather than "power cycling" (i.e. rebooting themselves). MBs, though, could definitely "spontaneously" reboot the system if they are going crazy. On the other hand it's possible a voltage drop on one of the lines or other power fluctuation is actually what's triggering the MB to reboot the system. If it was me and I had the money I would replace both components.
If it's a crappy power supply, and running just at its capabilities, I don't think power cycling would be all that unusual.  They PSU may not even really shut off, the motherboard just loses enough power that it resets itself.

There's also the possibility that cycling like that has damaged the motherboard which is compounding the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 11, 2009, 05:29:20 AM
Ok, so I will most likely replace both components, but not at the same time.  :drill:

Suggestions on reliable, not-to-expensive MBs or PSUs ?

And a decent manufacturer of RAM ? I read Samsung is not bad. vOv


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 11, 2009, 05:47:43 AM
Corsair, Kingston, Cruicial.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 11, 2009, 06:08:51 AM
Hm. Right now I can't even run a complete scan on Kaperski AV without rebooting the system  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 11, 2009, 06:15:40 AM
Ok, so I will most likely replace both components, but not at the same time.  :drill:

Suggestions on reliable, not-to-expensive MBs or PSUs ?
What's your budget?

Quote
And a decent manufacturer of RAM ? I read Samsung is not bad. vOv
Samsung is the largest DRAM chip maker so their stuff is obviously used by many of the name brands. Haven't actually used Samsung's own branded DIMMs before though. Corsair is my first choice for RAM.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 11, 2009, 07:48:03 AM
Quote
Suggestions on reliable, not-to-expensive MBs or PSUs ?
What's your budget?
Not more than 100€, less if possible. Right now I am thinking about an "ATX be quiet! Straight 450W" for 60€.

Also that is per piece of equipment, obviously  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 11, 2009, 11:21:57 AM
This guy any good? (http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/ca/en/ho/WF06b/12454-12454-3329738-214846-214846-3824167-3893333.html) I'm not sure about that video card, I assume it could be replaced or disabled. Its currently at sams club for 1200$.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 11, 2009, 12:47:31 PM
Say "NO" to retail prebuilt systems. You can build a pretty awesome system for that amount of money if you did it yourself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on July 11, 2009, 03:39:54 PM
I've been having to do far too much troubleshooting on my boss's new HP, I'd avoid them at this time. His is a couple steps down from that one, with tons of driver issues.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on July 11, 2009, 06:13:24 PM
The hanging at BIOS suggests that the motherboard is struggling with hardware.

NTLDR reported as missing suggests somethings' amiss with the new hard drive, but it may also be something wrong with RAM. The inability for a system to load stuff into RAM can sometimes manifest itself as 'missing' or 'corrupt' files, when in fact the files are just fine on the hard drive, its their transport to bad RAM that  makes them look missing or corrupt. The system just doesn't know how to tell you that.

Lastly, burn a copy of Ultimate Boot CD and do mem tests and HD tests if any of the above is inconclusive.

Ok the problem of BIOS hanging seems to have magically stopped. Windows loading screen is still freezing every now and again but not as often as it was. I actually remember having a similar problem last time I reinstalled XP on the old Hard drive and it died down after a while as well. I suspect you might be right about the RAM being the iffy bit I'll have to run some mem tests. Also the old HDD now has Ubuntu installed and isn't connected at the moment so conflicts from that weren't the problem. Thanks for the help Engels and Lant, magically self-repairing problems are the most worrying kind though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 12, 2009, 06:56:44 PM
Hm. I upped the voltage settings for both north and south bridge to "highest", now I was able to run a whole game of Blood Bowl withough crashing.

Temperature did not rise in any significant way, except for the GPU with rose 5 °C to 55 °C, but that is nothing unusual. I think.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 14, 2009, 01:50:52 PM
Hm. I upped the voltage settings for both north and south bridge to "highest", now I was able to run a whole game of Blood Bowl withough crashing.

Temperature did not rise in any significant way, except for the GPU with rose 5 °C to 55 °C, but that is nothing unusual. I think.
That worked only for a day.

My new PSU arrived today and in a fit of madness I decided to rip my old case apart and to put everything in a new case.

First time I did something like that, so far it worked.

Now I need to find an SATA cable so I can connect my shiny new 1TB HD.

*crosses fingers*

Let's hope my resetting problems are a thing of the past.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 15, 2009, 10:30:56 PM
So, if all of the sudden a hard drive is running slow as dirt, popping up with a ton of bad sectors (around 200+ errors in a SeaTools test) and file problems all over the place, is it worth doing a low level format, reinstalling windows, and just praying it doesn't happen again?

Is there any way to tell if it's a physical drive failure or just mass file corruption due to something else?

Assume I've done many virus and malware checks with nothing resulting.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 15, 2009, 10:36:07 PM
If you get a utility that can read the SMART data on the drive you can get a sense that way if it's the drive that's failing. Another thing to try, though this is somewhat of a longshot, is to switch the cables (power and SATA/IDE) if you can. I recently had an external drive that was acting up (corrupted directory table and stuff) and it was actually the USB cable or the port on the USB hub that was bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 17, 2009, 07:52:49 AM
Switched cables.  Did a "low level format" (what passes for one with the Seagate tools).  However, the drive fails any long test.

Got the blue screen after reinstalling windows that started this whole thing.  Some iastor.sys issue that exists apparently with Dell PCs  :awesome_for_real:, for which the Dell provided solution doesn't work (the driver update refuses to install).  Drive scan is already finding errors, although not many (2 errors at 9%).  The drive seems to be operating fine otherwise, but I'm a bit worried it's just a matter of time before the errors really start creeping in.

 Fun. :|


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 17, 2009, 08:37:25 AM
I always say: hard drives don't get better.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 17, 2009, 08:58:36 AM
I always say: hard drives don't get better.
No, I've heard you say other things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on July 17, 2009, 11:32:02 PM
I always say: hard drives don't get better.
No, I've heard you say other things.

I N Y O U R M O U T H ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on July 20, 2009, 07:25:58 AM
I did the weirdest thing yesterday.  I got a hair up my ass and went out and bought a new case, PSU and graphics card.  I then proceeded to tear out all the contents of my not-so-old Dell (bought it a year ago) and move it all over into the new case.  Never done anything like that before...I mean, I've managed to swap out the odd vid card and piece of RAM in the past, but this was essentially building a machine from scratch (minus operating system installation, but I've done that several times).  Considering I only had a basic clue as to what I was doing, it went pretty well.  Problems encountered included not plugging in what must have been the power to the processor itself, not knowing that I had to go into the BIOS to reset the order of the SATA devices for bootup and not being able to figure out exactly which pins to plug in the stupid Power and Reset buttons and the LED lights for each of those buttons.  I still haven't figure this last part out, because it seems to be all trial and error.  I have it working, but the reset button is now the power button.  The power button does nothing.  The LED lights may be reversed.  Not sure how much I care....I can still turn it on an off.

Oh, and the card I bought was the BFG GTX 285 OC - supposedly the fastest single gpu on the planet, and the reason I had to buy the new case and PSU in the first place.  Haven't had time yet to do anything but boot up a quick Age of Conan session, but it looks like it'll run it at maxed out settings at 30-40 fps in Tortage.  Weeee!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 20, 2009, 08:19:40 AM
sweet. what was the case, and what are your other system specs; cpu, memory, motherboard?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 20, 2009, 08:47:48 AM
The bit about not knowing what the pins do is why you would want to buy a mainboard separately, since it would come with a manual.  The ASUS boards, in fact, have this little dongle that you plug all the wires into and then you slip the dongle over the set of pins; hard to screw that up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on July 20, 2009, 08:50:53 AM
sweet. what was the case, and what are your other system specs; cpu, memory, motherboard?

The case is a "CoolerMaster CM690 nVIDIA Edition ATX Mid-Tower Case"...other than being big enough to house the monster vid card and having the pre-requisite case fans, the only reason I can say I picked it was because there were things about the other cases I didn't like.

The parts I salvaged were from an Inspiron 530

CPU: Core2 Quad 6600
RAM: 4 Gb DDR2 of the 533hz variety, I believe
MB:  Dell Inspiron 530 SMT RY007 (Dual Core 775 socket)...their proprietary shit, I guess.

Motherboard and RAM could use an upgrade in theory, but I doubt I'll notice it for a while.  I'm guessing the vid card is going to make me not care for at least a year.

The bit about not knowing what the pins do is why you would want to buy a mainboard separately, since it would come with a manual.  The ASUS boards, in fact, have this little dongle that you plug all the wires into and then you slip the dongle over the set of pins; hard to screw that up.

Aye, but it isn't serious enough to warrant buying a new board.  Like I said, I did get it to work, even if it is the wrong way around.  Hopefully I won't catch fire.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 20, 2009, 10:55:52 AM
That CoolerMaster case does look rather good. I bet it keeps things pretty cool, but I have to wonder about noise reduction. It looks like its mostly alluminium.

Glad to hear your systemspecs. I had an alterior motive; my specs are very similar, but I run a 8800GT and my AoC framerate isn't the best. I was wondering how a vid upgrade might help, and it looks like it would.

Its very tempting, but I'm also hearing that the Nvidia 300 series will be released this fall. That, combined with Core i7 and SSD drives, and also USB 3.0 makes me want to hold on a bit longer and then do a full rebuild, then take my current machine into work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on July 20, 2009, 11:11:19 AM
I'll post back here with more info on AoC framerates once I get a chance to put it through it's paces.  First impression, though brief, was very promising.

Noise rarely bothers me - a combination of having good after-market speakers cranked up, as well as a decade of marriage teaching me to tune out unnecessary background noises.  That said, it seems only a few decibels louder than my former case.  That may change under stress, where it will probably go higher.

Also keep in mind that BFG has that upgrade policy.  Never used it before myself, but I guess you have 100 days, within which you can trade in your current card at the current market value (value as of the day you trade it).  Last but not least, there are probably better bang-for-the-buck cards out there if you don't want to spend as much.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on July 20, 2009, 11:14:33 AM
I think winter/Q1-2010 is more likely for both Ati and Nvidia's next parts. TSMC's 40nm issues have set everything back quite a bit.

And coolermaster does some nice cases. I loves my HAF from them.

Yeah, bang for the buck is not great on the 285, but it is about as good as it gets for a single card. Can't beat the bang/buck of the Sapphire Atomic 4890 I won a few weeks ago though!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 20, 2009, 11:22:12 AM
The bit about not knowing what the pins do is why you would want to buy a mainboard separately, since it would come with a manual.  The ASUS boards, in fact, have this little dongle that you plug all the wires into and then you slip the dongle over the set of pins; hard to screw that up.

Yah, this is why my next upgrade will be a case/MB/CPU (and likely RAM). It was bad enough putting in a new power supply into my older XPS.  The cable management was a nightmare and things unplugged I had to guess where they went again. I bent the shit out of some dodad on the MB, which scares me.  I really need a new case as keeping this one cool in the location it's in means leaving it open as the air flow in it is crap (plus there's not any room to add more fans in the case).

Despite this, the next time I go for a whole new computer, it'll still likely to be a Dell. I'm so bad at building my own.


To tie up what I posted earlier: I ended up replacing the drive.  It was failing most self tests and small amounts of errors would be discovered continually. Got a 1TB WD.  It only took about 2 hours before Windows was installed and the comp was ready for basic use.  Not a quiet drive, but the transfer speeds and access times are rather nice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 22, 2009, 09:06:06 AM
PSU in my main rig died.  Looking at going to 1000W.  Recommend one.  GO!

Also, thinking about ordering a Q9650 to replace a Q6600 (oc'd to 3.2Ghz).  Yay?  Nay?  Keep in mind, I will overclock it, and will probably be replacing the 8800GTS G92's in about 6 months.  Unsure if I'll be going with one card, or going SLI with whatever is current at that time (also the reason I'm looking at a 1000W PSU). 

Looking to avoid bottlenecks and run any game I want at max settings across the board at 1920x1200 reso.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 22, 2009, 09:34:28 AM
What's your budget? Cuz of course, we're all about the PSU, but they scale a lot. Also, 1000 is A LOT of power. Normally reserved for tripple crossfire configs. Hope you don't mind a steep electric bill!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 22, 2009, 09:45:50 AM
Budget?  $500 max, which is well above what the most expensive 900-1000W I could find on newegg.  Seems once you get above 1000W is when it really starts getting expensive.

I've often wondered what the home appliance equivalent was to a high end / high wattage PSU.  A fridge?  Dryer?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 22, 2009, 09:47:51 AM
As has been said, look at the amperage on the 12V rails. High wattage is nice, but the 12V rail amperage is critical.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_supply_rail

Like memory and, well, everything, I stick to quality name brands for PSUs. I'd rather cry while buying it than cry every time it shits the bed on me or suffer through sub-par performance.

Without taking the time to go through all the currently available supplies, I'll pull out two supplies as an example. PPC&C 750W (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817703009) vs Topower 1100W (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817342013). The PPC&C delivers 60A on the 12V rail, while the Topower delivers 20A.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on July 22, 2009, 11:58:23 AM
Also, thinking about ordering a Q9650 to replace a Q6600 (oc'd to 3.2Ghz).  Yay?  Nay? 

Personally I'm saving for better video card or for a switch to i5/i7 (have a Q6600 + p35 chipset + 8800gt).

775 socket is getting to the end of its life and the P55 is launching this fall bringing the new platform (http://www.techtree.com/India/News/Intel_to_Launch_Core_i5_Core_i7_CPUs_in_Sept/551-104670-893.html) down to a reasonable price so you will start to see more and more of the 775 phased out. I doubt you will cause the q6600 @3.2Ghz to bottleneck performance until you hit the very high end cards and then it's probably more of a benchmark loss then real world.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 22, 2009, 01:26:02 PM
I have heard that Corsairs are good now:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010320058+50001459&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&Subcategory=58&description=&Ntk=&CFG=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc=


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 22, 2009, 01:56:59 PM
I was looking at that Corsair, actually.  Good deal.  Thanks for the input!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on July 22, 2009, 06:48:51 PM
I have a Corsair and no complaints so far, they were heavily recommended on [h]ardocp and also they make modular PSU's which is pretty cool.  However I sometimes wake up in the night wishing it was a Seasonic, you can't beat Seasonic for quality PSU's.  My only other brand experiences have been bad and I one bought a Zalman branded PSU but I had looked up who the manufacturer of the actual unit was and it was rated well by those in the know.  Its still running 6 years later.

Seasonic though is the best of the best with honors and since you have a stupid large budget I would find one of their units that gives you the 12V power you need.  Buying based on the wattage is stupid.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 22, 2009, 07:44:04 PM
Some of the Corsairs are made by Seasonic.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 22, 2009, 08:18:26 PM
Is there a way to tell?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 22, 2009, 08:26:46 PM
Not easily. You can Google on:

Corsair Seasonic CWT

but there's conflicting info out there. I.e. some of the Corsair PSes people say are made by Seasonic may actually be made by CWT and vice versa.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 23, 2009, 10:51:44 AM
So, I ordered the new PC. I have everything hooked up, except for the case fans. the one in the back, and the one in the side.

They each have two plugs, on directly off the fan with two wires, the other is off the connector with the two wires, but it has 4 wires going to it. I assume I connect this to the PSU?

Am I correct in assuming that if I connect the one with just the two wires, it will just be on and off, but if i connect it to the one with 4, that the PSU will control speed?

The only place on the motherboard to connect a fan was for the CPU fan. The case fans have vastly different connectors.

Advice?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on July 23, 2009, 12:27:12 PM
If I understand you right:

  • The four-prong wire from the fan goes to the PSU. That's the only way to power the fan.
  • The two-prong wire goes to the mobo. There's a number of different places to plug it into your mobo. This will allow the BIOS (and apps) to display the fan speed and may allow the mobo to control the fan speed (depending on model).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 23, 2009, 01:29:45 PM
I guess i didn't explain it right. The connectors look like this:

(http://c1.neweggimages.com/NeweggImage/productimage/12-189-119-03.jpg)


With the two small wires attached to the fan. But, I think I have answered my own question, as I didn't notice at the time, but one is male, and the other female, so only one will work attaching it to the PSU. As far as I can tell, the mother board does not accept any connection like that one above. The CPU fan, however, had a spot and a different connector.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on July 23, 2009, 02:16:05 PM
The other end is so you can daisy chain device power lines together.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 23, 2009, 02:26:54 PM
 Most modern motherboards have at least 3, if not 4 or 5 connectors. They should be 3 pronged males that look the end of the connector you just posted a picture of.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 23, 2009, 02:50:36 PM
The larger ones are called "molex" I believe, and I will be happy when they are phased out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 23, 2009, 04:43:27 PM
It's just two different ways to power the fan.  Most motherboards have a few 3/4 pin fan connectors, but not all do, so molex is an alternative power connector.

Much like Yeg, I will be very happy when the molex connectors are phased out.  I've given myself so many cuts trying to separate stuck pieces.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 24, 2009, 08:03:51 AM
Most modern motherboards have at least 3, if not 4 or 5 connectors. They should be 3 pronged males that look the end of the connector you just posted a picture of.

There was nothing on the mother board that would accept that fitting.

This is the motherboard.  (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131377)

The other end is so you can daisy chain device power lines together.


Ahhh, I see now.

Anyway, all is fine, nothing blew up!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 24, 2009, 08:11:46 AM
Most modern motherboards have at least 3, if not 4 or 5 connectors. They should be 3 pronged males that look the end of the connector you just posted a picture of.

There was nothing on the mother board that would accept that fitting.

This is the motherboard.  (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131377)


There are 4 of those on that motherboard. Two by the heat pipe for the chipset cooler, two on the edge by the ram slots.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 24, 2009, 08:15:45 AM
Most modern motherboards have at least 3, if not 4 or 5 connectors. They should be 3 pronged males that look the end of the connector you just posted a picture of.

There was nothing on the mother board that would accept that fitting.

This is the motherboard.  (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131377)


There are 4 of those on that motherboard. Two by the heat pipe for the chipset cooler, two on the edge by the ram slots.

I'm talking about the big white ends, with the 4 posts. There is no connection for that. As I said before, in the image I posted, the two leads go right to the fan, and are attached, it does not have that connector (small, 2-3 prong)

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Molex_female_connector.jpg)

The octopus of a power supply has two stands of this:

(http://reviews.techaddicts.net/albums/mushkinap580/normal_2molex_wm.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 24, 2009, 08:37:03 AM
Sorry if I misunderstood you. I was under the impression that the fans themselves had a wire with a 3 'hole' small female power connector. The cable adapter you posted a picture of earlier can be used if all your motherboard connectors are taken.

Are you saying that the fans themselves do not have the standard 3 prong female end, but end in a molex (the 4 pronged larger connector)? Or are you saying that although they do have a 3 prong small female connector, its just way too short to plug into the motherboard?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 24, 2009, 08:41:02 AM
Are you saying that the fans themselves do not have the standard 3 prong female end, but end in a molex (the 4 pronged larger connector)?

Yep. X2, one is male and one is female. The two wire lead to the fan is not removable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 24, 2009, 09:13:17 AM
Molex connects to the power supply.  Fans do not have to be plugged into the motherboard unless you have some burning desire for every auxillery fan to report its speed in BIOS, in which case go get a different fan.

It just needs power.  Find the matching end and plug it in.  It'll be fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 24, 2009, 12:12:33 PM
Molex connects to the power supply.  Fans do not have to be plugged into the motherboard unless you have some burning desire for every auxillery fan to report its speed in BIOS, in which case go get a different fan.

It just needs power.  Find the matching end and plug it in.  It'll be fine.

Yep, figured that out already =)

The pink machine ran all night with out going into flames!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 24, 2009, 02:43:06 PM
Two words: wire nuts.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 24, 2009, 05:08:40 PM
In fact, I found out that some 12 cm low RPM fans purposefully do not have the 3rd wire and only provide molex because they are specialized fans only meant for low noise, low RPM.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 26, 2009, 07:37:49 PM
If I have this PSU:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139005 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139005)

Besides getting a plug adapter, is there anything other special equipment I would need in order to run the PC on a foreign country's powergrid?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 26, 2009, 09:18:51 PM
No. Though you might want to buy a UPS over there depending on the country and how long you are staying there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 26, 2009, 11:52:04 PM
Europe also runs at 50 hertz. The PSU should tell you if it can handle the 10 hertz drop from the US to EU.

Some info here (http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-the-electrical-voltage-differences-between-the-us-and-europe.htm)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 27, 2009, 04:31:28 PM
Yeah, it says Input Frequency Range     50/60 Hz.

So should I notice zero difference when plugging into a different grid, since it seems the PSU can use so many different grades of power?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 27, 2009, 04:51:44 PM
I'd say so. Unless there's some weird manufacturing shortcut where the parts will 'sorta' work in a different country for a while, but have a greatly reduced lifespan since they weren't -really- made for a different voltage/freq. I have no earthly idea tho.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 27, 2009, 05:36:31 PM
Yeah, it says Input Frequency Range     50/60 Hz.

So should I notice zero difference when plugging into a different grid, since it seems the PSU can use so many different grades of power?
Correct. It's a "universal" power supply cause it supports 50/60 Hz, 100 - 240 Volts.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 31, 2009, 04:45:33 AM
Since I installed my new motherboard and PSU I don't have a cd-rom/dvd-drive connected, because I need the two IDE slots for my two hard drives.

So I have started to use nocd-patches to still be able to run my non-steam games.

Now I have Kapersky Anti Virus installed and all (every single one of them) of my "fixed" exes come up with a keylogger alert. I got them from various sources, a scan of the files does not show anything unusual. I would not be suprised if I got a few infected files, but all of them ? What has the world come to ?

What struck me as odd is that only Kapersky gives a keylogger alert, Avast or AVG did not recognize anything. System scans show nothing as well.

Now I am wondering if Kapersky is the problem.  :awesome_for_real:

Also recomendations for good scan/clean AV software would be much appreciated.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2009, 05:00:48 AM
Where did you get your no-CD patches from?

I've seen this "discrepancy" with trainer programs where one scanner would flag one as a key logger but others wouldn't. I chalked it up to that scanner being "overly sensitive" to keyboard traps (don't remember the scanner but it wasn't Kapersky) which some trainers have so they can activate trainer functions from within the game (I deleted the trainer anyways just in case). I don't see why, though, a no-CD hacked game executable would need to do the same sort of keyboard hack unless the original executable has the same code in it and therefore would be flagged by Kaspersky as well.

It could be there's some other common no-CD hack pattern that is similiar to a pattern within a key logger that Kaspersky is triggering off of but I don't know what that might be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 31, 2009, 05:57:25 AM
Where did you get your no-CD patches from?

I've seen this "discrepancy" with trainer programs where one scanner would flag one as a key logger but others wouldn't. I chalked it up to that scanner being "overly sensitive" to keyboard traps (don't remember the scanner but it wasn't Kapersky) which some trainers have so they can activate trainer functions from within the game (I deleted the trainer anyways just in case). I don't see why, though, a no-CD hacked game executable would need to do the same sort of keyboard hack unless the original executable has the same code in it and therefore would be flagged by Kaspersky as well.

It could be there's some other common no-CD hack pattern that is similiar to a pattern within a key logger that Kaspersky is triggering off of but I don't know what that might be.

Hm. Gamecopyworld is one of them, a few I got from torrent sites.

What I don't get is that the alarm only goes of if I run the file (and only if Kapersky is active, Avast and AVG remain silent), scans of the file or the whole directory or the whole archive show nothing.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2009, 06:04:51 AM
Well it could be the exe code is obfuscated in some way so a file scan isn't picking things up but when the code actually runs in memory Kapersky is picking up an attempt to trap keyboard events or something of that natureal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 31, 2009, 08:38:53 AM
Buy a goddamned Lite-On SATA optical, ya teutonic twat.

$20 or risk getting a keylogger/virus/aids/whatever. Tough one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on July 31, 2009, 09:24:52 AM
Buy a goddamned Lite-On SATA optical, ya teutonic twat.

$20 or risk getting a keylogger/virus/aids/whatever. Tough one.
Got the drive already. I just need to install it.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on July 31, 2009, 10:05:54 AM
Also recomendations for good scan/clean AV software would be much appreciated.  :awesome_for_real:

Microsoft security essentials (http://www.betanews.com/article/print/New-Microsoft-Morro-antimalware-will-share-competitors-security-events/1245792385)  :grin:

Quote
MSE is aimed first and foremost at users who either can’t or won’t pay for antivirus/anti-malware software. There will be no registration required, no trials with an expiration date or required renewals. But Microsoft is restricting the MSE download (both the beta and final) to PCs running Genuine Windows

It's in beta right now Vista/7 (32/64bit) and XP (32bit) for unlimited installs on non production systems.

Dig around and you can find it (but for god sake check the md5/sha signatures (http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/microsoft-security-essentials-md5-and-sh)).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 31, 2009, 10:22:54 AM
Oddly enough, clicking on the MSE link caused IE to lock up and require a complete reboot  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on July 31, 2009, 10:33:19 AM
Sorry about that flash heavy site that had some info (switching links to another review print link)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 02, 2009, 12:22:47 PM
So the other day something in my computer finally snapped and shat itself. Instant diagnosis was either the graphics card or motherboard since the screen was suddenly filled with artifacting and upon trying to reboot it simply refused to do anything for an hour or two. Power light and fans, etc. came on but nothing else. When it finally did boot to Bios there was lots of artifacting and XP wouldn't load. I've been putting off an upgrade for a while and most of the system was 5 years old (Graphics card was closer to 7 :ye_gods:) so went out today and bought myself a shiny i7 with a new MB, RAM, PSU and a cheap Radeon 3650 I plan to upgrade. Installed it all (first time, go me) and the only problem I've got is the power LED doesn't seem to be in right but I think that's down to a slightly weird set up issue and is made up for by the fact that the internal temperature LED is now finally working on the case.

My problem however is that I want to now move to Windows 7 RC, ideally the 64 version. I've downloaded and burned the iso to a DVD but can't install from XP since it's the 32 bit version and the DVD doesn't seem to be bootable. Trying to run it just gives me a message to boot from it which doesn't help. Am I doing something stupid? How do I get this bugger to work so I can enjoy the full upgrade experience?

I also bought a new keyboard since my old one had a couple of keys where the springs had failed. The new one is a lightweight USB thing that's too thin and not very tactile, I now understand Schild's dislike of them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 02, 2009, 12:56:14 PM
Have you checked your BIOS to see if the CD drive comes before the HD in boot priority?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 02, 2009, 02:32:04 PM
Yeah, I even made sure by disabling everything except the CD drive as a boot device and just got a message that I need to insert bootable media or restart. The .iso image seems to be good but won't work as a boot device.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 02, 2009, 03:54:31 PM
When you burned the .iso image did you specify that you were making a bootable DVD? When I make one with Nero I have to specifically choose to make a bootable disk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 02, 2009, 04:58:19 PM
Ya, that's my other suspicion. Might want to burn the iso using something very basic, like the default burn interface that comes with Windows, rather than a program like Nero or Roxio.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 02, 2009, 05:17:58 PM
That could be it. Burned the disc with Alcohol and there doesn't seem to be any option to make a bootable anything there. Followed an on-line guide that used imgburn that also lacked this option (though the guide strongly suggested, as in basically said, that this should work as a bootable disc). Installing Nero now to give that a whirl but I don't seem to have any default DVD burning program bundled with windows. Any suggestions on something reliable (assuming Nero doesn't do the job)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 02, 2009, 05:46:47 PM
Did you actually download the ISO or did you make it yourself from a set of files? There's nothing special you need to do to make an ISO that was made to be bootable into a bootable CD/DVD -- you just burn it. But if your ISO wasn't made to be bootable you need to remake the ISO so that it is, or burn the individual files from the ISO using something like Nero and tell Nero to make a bootable DVD.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 02, 2009, 06:24:41 PM
Using the official straight from MS iso image to burn. I get the feeling I'm just doing something stupid because it seems ridiculous the 64 bit version iso would be borked. However the CD drive works and I even used it to do a fresh XP install before trying to move with the times. I might have a go at burning and booting with a 32 bit version of W7 tomorrow and see if I have any more luck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 02, 2009, 11:58:18 PM
It could be a corrupt download, or your burning process is getting corrupted. I burn a lot of CDs/DVDs at work of bootable OSs, etc, and one out of, say, 5 gets horked in the burn. Its an imperfect science.

One thing that I do sometimes is turn the burn speed down one notch from max. I know it, probably has zero technical merit, but part of me thinks that a slower burn is a more careful burn with less chance of corruption.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 03, 2009, 01:14:05 AM
Any suggestions on something reliable (assuming Nero doesn't do the job)?

Been using the default program in Ubuntu for my ISO burns, zero coasters so far.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 03, 2009, 07:10:44 AM
As I thought, retardedness uncovered :oh_i_see:. The CD drive option in Bios wasn't my CD drive, picked the right drive and am now posting from Windows 7. Seems nice so far but I never got Vista so getting used to the changes may take a little while.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 03, 2009, 09:25:13 PM
If I bring a LCD monitor overseas, do I need to do anything special besides getting the appropriate plug adapter?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: IainC on August 03, 2009, 11:55:04 PM
I have an annoying problem since returning from holiday. Bear in mind that everyhting worked fine before going away for three weeks and the problem manifested itself from the first time I restarted my PC on my return.

I have a wireless network in my house consisting of a DSL box serving two PCs, an Xbox 360 and a PS3. If you're curious the DSL box is Vodafone's DSL Easy-Box 802. My PC only has intermittent internet connectivity, it will be fine for about a minute then drop for a couple of minutes and then start working again. This will repeat over and over. At the moment I'm watching the EvE client download (which resumes automatically) and I can see it's a fairly steady pattern of approximately 1 minute on, 3 minutes off. While I don't have internet connectivity, I do still have a network connection, I can browse the local network and the wireless network icon doesn't show any errors. I can access the DSL box config page at all times and monitor the connection which is reported as being fine - I can even test the connection from there which will succeed even when the internet connection on my PC is unavailable.

My wife's PC is fine and has an uninterrupted connection as are the two consoles so it's pretty clearly an issue with my machine.

I've reinstalled the wireless modem in my OC twice and, in desperation I've performed a clean reinstall of Windows as well (XP Home). At the moment I'm on a pretty much vanilla install with no updates as I can't download them reliably.

I've checked the connection settings via ipconfig and the TCP/IP properties and compared them with those on my wife's PC, they appear to be fine. The DSL box is the  DHCP server to all the machines and that appears to be in order too - there are no conflicts and Ive also tried manually assigning IP addresses across the networkand that makes no odds.

Running a network cable between my PC and the network box is out of the question as they are on different floors of my apartment and there is no convenient path from one to the other.

My DSL box clearly works, my wireless network card clearly works and I seem to have ruled out some fruity Windows issue so I don't understand what the problem could be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 04, 2009, 01:05:27 AM
If I bring a LCD monitor overseas, do I need to do anything special besides getting the appropriate plug adapter?
Depends on the monitor's power supply/brick.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 04, 2009, 01:16:52 AM
Running a network cable between my PC and the network box is out of the question as they are on different floors of my apartment and there is no convenient path from one to the other.
If your machine is the only one that's on and connecting wirelessly (i.e. the game boxes are off and your wife's PC is off) do you still have this problem?

Move your PC temporarily to the floor the router is on and use a cable to connect them.

If a cable works are you using any sort of security mechanisms to keep unauthorized machines for connecting wirelessly? If yes turn it/them off temporarily. If no turn it/them on temporarily.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: IainC on August 04, 2009, 01:30:38 AM
Nevermind, I'm a moron. My machine was still connected to a separate wired router that was providing our network in the weeks before Vodafone connected our DSL up. When I left for my holiday, I unplugged everything and it was off for long enough to reset itself to factory defaults. Thus I had two DHCP servers trying to assign me a network address. Once I unplugged it everything was fine.

Grrr.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 06, 2009, 12:49:14 PM
Firstly I'm running Windows 7, Sapphire HD Radeon 3650 on an Asus P6T with an i7 920 and 4gb RAM.

I'm back with a (hopefully) non-retarded question. With my newly revamped PC I finally got round to installing Fallout 3 but I've encountered some really fuckin annyoing crashes. First session was fine lasted an hour or so then quit the game and booted it up about 20 minutes later and suddenly after about 3 or 4 seconds of play the game would stop responding and I'd get a message saying the video card had rebooted. This continued every time I tried to play. After rebooting the box things improved insofar as after 3 or 4 seconds the screen would freeze for about 10 seconds, briefly switch to desktop and then let me play for another 3 or 4 seconds before repeating. I left the whole thing alone and started it up again today and got a few hours of playtime before quitting the program and the problem started all over again.

Prior to moving to Windows 7 I had a similar problem with DoW II demo on XP which crashed and gave me a message that my video card had stopped responding and been rebooted. I've installed the latest catalyst drivers and the 9.6 drivers. Neither seemed to help. Problem could be overheating I guess, the card seems to be running a little under 50C. I'm not sure if that's hot but it's also set for the lowest overclock settings which means overheats well within design parameters. I'm hoping this isn't the case.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 06, 2009, 12:55:17 PM
My 8800GTX pushes 80C on stuff like Crysis.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 06, 2009, 01:08:11 PM
So probably not an overheating issue as far as I can see but something seems to be screwing with it. I'm not convinced it's a driver issue just because different drivers seem to have made no difference and it can play without a problem. I've got a 750w PSU so it shouldn't be a power issue either but it seems to be something related to the vid card. Have I just got a bum card?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 06, 2009, 02:19:03 PM
Could be RAM or mobo, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 06, 2009, 04:01:57 PM
Hey that's a huge help, now I have to worry about everything else I just bought! :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 06, 2009, 04:08:57 PM
What keyboard are you using? I had VERY strange problems that I thought were anywhere from failing blue ray player to virus infection, and it turned out it was my POS $100.00 Razer keyboard that, after a month of use, is now in the trashcan.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 06, 2009, 04:16:37 PM
Hmm.. Got an MS ergonomic keyboard. Might give my old PS/2 connecting one a shot just to make sure though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on August 06, 2009, 04:25:48 PM
Have you physically inspected the card to make sure the fan is unobstructed, the heat sink is still attached and isn't clogged with dust wolves, the memory heatsinks are still there, and the video card power connection is secure? And that the fan is spinning when on of course. Next I'd go to the catalyst control center > overdrive and see what the fan is defaulting to. Then perhaps turn it to 80% or so and see if that makes a difference. You could be overheating the memory chips on the card itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 06, 2009, 04:50:36 PM
Physical inspection of the card and it seems fine. Big plastic thing covering the fan/chip so it's not impossible that there's something wrong there but it doesn't feel hand meltingly hot right after shut down. Got the message (and game properly crashing) again and it says that the driver stopped responding. Tried a few different versions of the catalyst drivers and all seem to do the same thing, could the drivers just be borked for my card (this would include the drivers on the CD with the card and the ones on the manufacturers website)?

Catalyst control centre seems to suggest the card is running at absoilute minimum, processor is 300mhz and memory is 500mhz. Hitting the autotune button just results in a window saying the system is being tested that stays there until I hit cancel. I've left it for about an hour before and nothing happened.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on August 06, 2009, 07:17:22 PM
I'd remove all driver bits, guru3d I think has a tool for it. DriverSweeper or some such. Then fresh install latest Catalyst. Sounds like something in your driver install is borked.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 08, 2009, 08:03:05 AM
Tried that and it seems to have made absolutely no difference. It isn't unplayable simply because sometimes it will happily play with almost no problems whatsoever for hours. It's even crashed and restarted the program a-ok. Then I'll shut it down, boot it back up 3 minutes later and it starts the crash cycle again. It's persisting and changing stuff doesn't seem to be doing anything (drivers a couple of times and tried swapping it between different PCI-e slots). I'm now getting bored trying to do anything or figure out what's wrong and since I can still play a bit I think I'm just going to write it up as a fucking annoyance. If it persists in all games (still haven't got round to trying anything else) I may start throwing things at walls to calm down.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on August 08, 2009, 09:00:55 AM
Sapphire is pretty good for warranty in my limited experience with them, might want to give them a call. Or pick up a $30 video card and use that to isolate the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 08, 2009, 09:10:03 AM
Yeah, since it seemed to happen in XP 32 and W7 64 I'm going to guess it isn't actually a driver issue even though the message I get is, "The driver stopped responding." Will have a look at borrowing a Vid card or getting a cheap piece of crap for testing purposes. Thanks for the suggestions in the thread guys.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 09, 2009, 08:56:59 AM
Tried that and it seems to have made absolutely no difference. It isn't unplayable simply because sometimes it will happily play with almost no problems whatsoever for hours. It's even crashed and restarted the program a-ok. Then I'll shut it down, boot it back up 3 minutes later and it starts the crash cycle again. It's persisting and changing stuff doesn't seem to be doing anything (drivers a couple of times and tried swapping it between different PCI-e slots). I'm now getting bored trying to do anything or figure out what's wrong and since I can still play a bit I think I'm just going to write it up as a fucking annoyance. If it persists in all games (still haven't got round to trying anything else) I may start throwing things at walls to calm down.
My system was exhibiting something similar earlier this year.  I spent a lot of time and effort trying to track it down (and a new vid card, because the symptoms were perfect for a fried GPU).  It was something at the system level though, because after a full format, things worked perfectly.

I think it was left-overs from an unpleasant little virus I got, or the Mass Effect DRM.  All my problems seemed to start in earnest after I installed it. :sad:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 11, 2009, 07:37:09 AM
Need a bit of help, my in laws PC got badly virused I came over to fix it none of the browsers were working so I tried to reinstall IE. I know it was dumb but I uninstalled the original nonworking one and it removed some important DLLs and I can only assume regvalues so now Windows Explorer doesn't work and I can only access Data through Taskmgr which is having issues aswell. I can't reinstall the IE8 this way as it tells me the crytographic services now aren't working. Anyway I have a boot repair CD and I have mini XP running off it, using which I have removed a couple of nasty viruses. The best solution it seems is running a boot repair off the Windows XP CD. I have this CD but the version I have doesn't have the option for Repair, only an option to format install Windows which is not an option or the recovery console. I can't easily backup their data either as the Harddrive is an old IDE drive and I only have SATA connections on my PC so I can't do a crossover only option there is to burn off a dozen DVDs. Anyone know where I can get my hands on a Boot CD with the Windows-repair option I have the legit XP serial key? Actually the XP CD I have is Windows Professional and they are running Home Edition so I need that disc it seems but not easy to get your hands on, any tips welcome.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 11, 2009, 08:27:33 AM
Uninstalling IE8 should not have horked your OS. I think that's a bi-product of your infection.

You could probably futz around with media and get Windows reinstalled/repaired, but to be honest, at this stage, between the viruses and your horked explorer (the windows 'gui'), I'd say you are better off copying vital files to a thumb drive and then reinstalling. I'd do this via a Ubuntu or Fedora live CD since that OS would probably prevent infection of the thumdrive (allowing, of course, that the files you're copying aren't themselves infected).

That said, if you are hell bent on recovering the OS, you may want to use Task Manager to run 'cmd.exe' and then running a chkdsk command  (http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/chkdsk.mspx?mfr=true) with the appropriate flags. Chkdsk can often recover vital OS files that are corrupted or missing.


If that works, I'd then want to run an off-line scan of your system, so I would suggest installing Avast! antivirus that, upon its first installation, asks you if you want to run a 'at boot time' scan. I've found it useful in removing some pretty entrenched virii in the past. Others may have other solutions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 11, 2009, 08:37:36 AM
I can't easily backup their data either as the Harddrive is an old IDE drive and I only have SATA connections on my PC so I can't do a crossover only option there is to burn off a dozen DVDs.
Buy an external hard drive case that accepts IDE drives and plug that into your computer using USB or FireWire (depending on what the case provides and what your computer accepts).

You are going to have to reinstall Windows. Trying to repair it is not a long term solution since even if you somehow manage to get it working things will still be fucked up from the malware that's still there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 11, 2009, 09:58:26 AM
You could also get one of these, though the external case would come in useful beyond this instance.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812232004


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on August 11, 2009, 09:59:36 AM
You are going to have to reinstall Windows. Trying to repair it is not a long term solution since even if you somehow manage to get it working things will still be fucked up from the malware that's still there.

Do this grab a hard drive caddy with both connectors or something like this converter (http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812816014) so you can connect it right to another PC.

Format format format, your going to waste tons of time trying to repair the damage and never know if its fixed say if there is some damage their pc suffered that effects the install of further patches. Backup their hard drive some how. Take the XP CD, download the latest drivers for their computer and grab sp3 (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&DisplayLang=en), and a copy of nlite (http://www.nliteos.com/). Slipstream in the patch to the cd and the drivers using nlite and reinstall.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 11, 2009, 10:17:53 AM
Thanks fellas I'll look at getting one of those adapters somewhere. Also yeh I agree I got some pretty nasty viruses on my own PC recently and the only solution was a fresh install. Problem is in that case I had no CD but I was able to mirror a working OS from the original HDD in this case there's no mirror or no XP CD hrrumph hate Windows more and more, but alas it's the old folks and they won't take Ubuntu kindly so the age old question where to get my hands on Windows XP install CD?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on August 11, 2009, 10:44:09 PM
no XP CD hrrumph hate Windows more and more, but alas it's the old folks and they won't take Ubuntu kindly so the age old question where to get my hands on Windows XP install CD?

Don't hate XP, hate the system builder that didn't include a CD. It was common till late I think up to a year ago dell charged extra for an OEM branded install disc.

If your lucky there might be an i386 directory on the hard drive for "reinstall" self recovery/CD tool vendors sometimes use. You can take the i386 directory (check it for virii) and load it into nlite as an install source to hopefully build an install CD.

Legally? Contact your system builder and buy a CD.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 12, 2009, 11:43:58 AM
Her old man is going into the city to collect one of those IDE converters tomorrow, in the meantime I've tracked down a Windows XP CD and doing a repair install see how it works after that. And you are correct Fuser this was a Dell machine so no CD in the box but I had one lying around from an old PC from years ago. Funny thing is I hear it's illegal to download and share the Windows install but yet if they don't give you the CD so you need to purchase it even though it is bundled with your machine, total sham if you ask me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 12, 2009, 07:35:07 PM
Ok I managed to do repair install and then a boot run scan with Avast which got rid of another 3 virii, PC is running pretty smooth now. To be on the safe side I'm gonna back everything up with that IDE converter and if it relapses just do a reformat. Thanks for the advice guys was a good platform.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 13, 2009, 02:04:32 AM
How on earth did they get that badly infected in the first place? Does someone have a secret porn obsession or something? Or just not know enough to never, ever click random email links?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 13, 2009, 05:42:38 AM
they come in bundles these days. one acts as a gate-opener, then others come in and root about.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 13, 2009, 03:52:53 PM
About 3-4 days ago my router started giving me trouble with wireless. It's really weird because my downloads go fast, but websites either don't load or go really slow. MSN also pops up a connection error saying changes made might not be saved to the server. I can't figure this out. I've changed the channels on the router, but no dice. What else could be the problem?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 13, 2009, 04:35:03 PM
Just taking a wild stab in the dark: proxy settings for your browser? (If it's on 'auto' turn it off, if it's off turn it on 'auto').

Edit: did you reboot the router? Does it work fine over Ethernet?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 13, 2009, 04:47:35 PM
Changed proxy setting in Firefox to auto from  being off.

I rebooted the router twice through the GUI, twice by power cycle and even factory reset it. Nothing fixed the problem. Last I checked, ethernet was fine, but I'll take another look.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 13, 2009, 06:51:43 PM
Is it hanging during name resolution (DNS lookups)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 13, 2009, 08:33:50 PM
How on earth did they get that badly infected in the first place? Does someone have a secret porn obsession or something? Or just not know enough to never, ever click random email links?

Their Virus Scanner subsrcription ended and they didn't renew it, they are middle aged and completely not internet savvy got the idea in their heads that Kerio firewall would stop everything. Anyway it's like a riot act at the moment might not be salvagable but it's working-ish for now albeit very slowly. Still twice as fast as it was before I got my hands on it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 14, 2009, 02:55:08 PM
Don't know where to stuff this, but the egg is having a 72 hour HDD sale, code HDDSALE15. 15% off up to $10, just bought a WD 500GB Black for $60 free ship.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 15, 2009, 11:11:53 AM
You could also get one of these, though the external case would come in useful beyond this instance.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812232004

I got my hands on one of these but when I plug it in doesn't pick up the HDD, properly, it detects it somewhat but cannot run it.

When I boot I get the message "Secondary drive 0 not found". It's spinning so the power cable is ok, maybe I need to update the BIOS?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 15, 2009, 02:32:47 PM
Just happened to see this in one of the reviews when I went to see what it was:

Quote
    Pros: Now that I got it working, its great... I can use my old IDE optical drive.
    Cons: Well, before I loaded my OS I NEEDED the jumper on my DRIVE set to master for it to work correctly, after it was all loaded, turned the computer off, turned back on & it wouldnt read my drive... switched the jumper to "cable select" then booted & it worked perfectly!!!!
    Other Thoughts: You might have to switch from master before loading OS, then cable select AFTER.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 15, 2009, 03:07:17 PM
I can boot the OS fine, it's seeing the Master drive as the Primary drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 15, 2009, 06:32:53 PM
You could also get one of these, though the external case would come in useful beyond this instance.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812232004

I got my hands on one of these but when I plug it in doesn't pick up the HDD, properly, it detects it somewhat but cannot run it.

When I boot I get the message "Secondary drive 0 not found". It's spinning so the power cable is ok, maybe I need to update the BIOS?
May need to fiddle with the jumper on the IDE drive. Never used that sort of adapter so not totally sure.

Edit: whoops Viin already posted that


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 15, 2009, 07:08:08 PM
I got my hands on one of these but when I plug it in doesn't pick up the HDD, properly, it detects it somewhat but cannot run it.

When I boot I get the message "Secondary drive 0 not found". It's spinning so the power cable is ok, maybe I need to update the BIOS?


Whoops yes excuse my ignorance on that one I didn't know what that meant never really dealt with IDE drives much, it's obviously a physical switch over of leads right? I thought it was something in the bios needed to be switched, I'll get on that. Ok I can see it now but it's pretty awkward to get at and the drive can't be removed without taking out the floppy and CD rom also. I'm gonna try and get a toothpick and pop it out I think it's in this one if that makes any sense >> ::[:]:

(http://www.seagate.com/images/support/en/us/useries9.gif)

Ok I've tried every sequence on this diagram except for the one with the two jumpers on it. It was initially on cable select afaik.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 16, 2009, 07:11:13 PM
You are running another SATA drive I assume? Try unplugging it and just booting up with this drive set as MASTER. Then go into your BIOS and make sure it's recognizing it. After that, plug your SATA back in and set this one to CABLE SELECT and start up again in BIOS.. make sure it shows both. If not, try having it auto detect the drive.

Are you sure this drive still works?  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 16, 2009, 07:52:16 PM
Is it hanging during name resolution (DNS lookups)?

How would I know if it is?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 17, 2009, 01:35:57 AM
Is it hanging during name resolution (DNS lookups)?

How would I know if it is?
Open up a command prompt. Figure out the domain name of a "resource" that's taking a long time to load. Type at the prompt:

nslookup <domain name>

E.g.

nslookup f13.net

If that's taking a long time it's your DNS server that's borked. Many ISPs have poor DNS servers. PacBell/SBC/AT&T was notoriously bad when they were first rolling out DSL lines in the SF Bay Area. I actually just used the DNS servers of my co-location servers for the longest time instead. Comcast isn't so great in my current area either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on August 17, 2009, 04:22:07 AM
You are running another SATA drive I assume? Try unplugging it and just booting up with this drive set as MASTER. Then go into your BIOS and make sure it's recognizing it. After that, plug your SATA back in and set this one to CABLE SELECT and start up again in BIOS.. make sure it shows both. If not, try having it auto detect the drive.

Are you sure this drive still works?  :why_so_serious:

They needed the machine back so never really found out I'll probably be getting it back in a couple of weeks though presumably riddled with viruses again. If/when that happens I'll try again and yes the spare SATA drive works hehe checked that aforehand. Just wondering though should I have set something akin to jumpers somewhere on the converter/SATA drive aswell to mimic IDE? There didn't seem to be a place to do it vOv


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 17, 2009, 03:49:52 PM
If that's taking a long time it's your DNS server that's borked. Many ISPs have poor DNS servers. PacBell/SBC/AT&T was notoriously bad when they were first rolling out DSL lines in the SF Bay Area. I actually just used the DNS servers of my co-location servers for the longest time instead. Comcast isn't so great in my current area either.

Did that and this is what I got:

(http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/41161/Images/cmd.jpg)

Took about 10 seconds to actually get a result.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 17, 2009, 04:13:51 PM
Your DNS is borked unless your router hosts it ;)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 17, 2009, 04:22:21 PM
God damnit. It was perfectly fine 2 weeks ago. God I hate technology.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on August 17, 2009, 05:16:18 PM
It's no big deal, just go into the router settings and set a couple of public DNS servers for look up services:

This is just from a google search but the servers on there are what I expected to see:
http://www.tech-faq.com/public-dns-servers.shtml


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 17, 2009, 05:41:43 PM
Would a slow DNS cause issues with MSN and Newsgroup downloading?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 17, 2009, 05:50:47 PM
A DNS issue can cause your download attempt to "hang" at the very beginning while the program patiently waits for the name server to give it back the IP address of the download host. Once a download starts, DNS issues shouldn't affect the download speed as the program now knows the IP address of the host. Packet loss, congestion, and other routing issues will, however, affect the actual download speed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 17, 2009, 07:35:09 PM
If your router has DHCP it should automagically get the DNS settings from your ISP, so you might look at that. (ie: turn DHCP on rather than hard setting IP address and DNS).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 11:02:50 AM
I have a hard drive in a busted DVR and I'd like to get at the shows on it.  I'm assuming there are "applications" to read it but I haven't been on that side of the Internet for a while.  Ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 18, 2009, 11:07:57 AM
If your router has DHCP it should automagically get the DNS settings from your ISP, so you might look at that. (ie: turn DHCP on rather than hard setting IP address and DNS).
Many times the ISP's DNS server is borked.  If I'm having issues I set mine to include my ISP and my work's DNS, though a public one would be fine, too.

Nix, if you use an IP address instead of a name does it work fine?  That's the easiest test to see if it is a DNS problem or not.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on August 18, 2009, 05:06:39 PM
PS3 40GB backward compatibility?  possible via emulator or anything?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 05:54:49 PM
PS3 40GB backward compatibility?  possible via emulator or anything?

No PS2 BC at all, nor possible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 18, 2009, 06:06:41 PM
Man, I really want one of these SSD hard drives (http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCategory.aspx?SubCategory=636&Tpk=ssd) for my boot partition but they are a bit pricey still. If anyone sees a deal for one, send it over!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 18, 2009, 10:37:53 PM
I have a hard drive in a busted DVR and I'd like to get at the shows on it.  I'm assuming there are "applications" to read it but I haven't been on that side of the Internet for a while.  Ideas?
What's the DVR? Most of the "name" ones have some sort of DRM that prevents you from playing the videos back on anything other than that type of device and you have to be a subscriber at the time (or have a lifetime sub).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 19, 2009, 07:37:09 AM
I have a hard drive in a busted DVR and I'd like to get at the shows on it.  I'm assuming there are "applications" to read it but I haven't been on that side of the Internet for a while.  Ideas?
What's the DVR? Most of the "name" ones have some sort of DRM that prevents you from playing the videos back on anything other than that type of device and you have to be a subscriber at the time (or have a lifetime sub).


I'm assuming it will not be easy.  It's a DirecTV DVR from when they worked with TiVo.  This would likely have been far easier had I needed to do this some years ago but a 2006 unit is probably locked tight.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 19, 2009, 07:51:31 AM
Why don't you just torrent the shows?  If you're willing to bypass the DRM anyway I don't think a little torrenty piracy is much different. And it'd sure be easier than screwing around with that hard drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 19, 2009, 07:57:03 AM
Why don't you just torrent the shows?  If you're willing to bypass the DRM anyway I don't think a little torrenty piracy is much different. And it'd sure be easier than screwing around with that hard drive.

A fine, fine question but I'd be somewhat surprised if the shows I am looking for are on the internets.  Besides, it's a nerd challenge.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 19, 2009, 08:19:04 AM
I'm assuming it will not be easy.  It's a DirecTV DVR from when they worked with TiVo.  This would likely have been far easier had I needed to do this some years ago but a 2006 unit is probably locked tight.
If it's a Tivo box there may be a way to do it then, since there is an active Tivo hacker community out there, though it would be a lot of work. There are ways to mount the Tivo HD on a PC (I've seen guides using Linux) and some of the formats can be decrypted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 22, 2009, 11:37:08 AM
Any suggestions for GPS units that are usable both in and outside of the US?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 22, 2009, 09:46:41 PM
Any recommendations for an external HD enclosure kit that works with a Seagate Momentus 5400.3?  Need to (try, anyway) get data off a dead laptop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 22, 2009, 09:48:03 PM
Any suggestions for GPS units that are usable both in and outside of the US?

For what purpose? Getting driving directions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 23, 2009, 08:00:40 AM
I wasn't aware you could use them for anything else.

I'll be moving to DC soon, and as the road system there is pretty crazy, it'd be nice to not get lost all the time. Same for when I go abroad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 23, 2009, 08:42:42 AM
I wouldn't worry about them once you go overseas.  Most rental cars have them, or at least as an option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 23, 2009, 10:27:20 AM
I'll be living overseas, so a rental isn't really an option.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 23, 2009, 03:55:49 PM
Ah, ok.  (Very cool, btw)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 23, 2009, 11:24:21 PM
Any recommendations for an external HD enclosure kit that works with a Seagate Momentus 5400.3?  Need to (try, anyway) get data off a dead laptop.
You are either going to need an enclosure that has a "double" USB connector to provide extra power or one that has it's own separate power supply. A powered USB port puts out 500mA of current but the Momentus is spec'd to require 1A (1000mA) to power up so with only one USB connector it may not get sufficient power to start up.

I got this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817106099

to use with the laptop drive that used to be in my Mac Mini since it does have an external power supply (its usage is optional, you don't have to use it if your drive doesn't need the extra power) and I wasn't sure what drive was inside my Mini and I didn't want to use up 2 USB ports since the Mini has a limited number.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 24, 2009, 08:55:48 AM
Good deal.  Will give that one a shot. 

Thank ya, sir.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on August 25, 2009, 10:07:30 AM
I just did a fresh install of Windows Vista on a new machine and I have not used Vista before (will get Windows 7 in November for free).

Is there anything I should be aware of ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 25, 2009, 10:11:34 AM
Bears.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 25, 2009, 08:42:05 PM
Windows 7 Envy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on August 31, 2009, 01:49:45 PM
I just did a fresh install of Windows Vista on a new machine and I have not used Vista before (will get Windows 7 in November for free).

Is there anything I should be aware of ?

In all cases that you can, I'd recommend putting your game installs in the Public folder, rather than the default places they'll want to install. This makes patching a lot easier.

Further, turn off the retarded UI that keeps popping up distressing-sounding messages about potentially questionable installs. I can't remember what the system is called, something like "UAC" I think. Whatever it is, it is stupid and needs to be shut off.

Finally, accept now that you'll be constantly annoyed, until you downgrade to WinXP or jump onto W7. I used it for almost a year before giving up on it. There's nothing about the OS that was worth the hassle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on August 31, 2009, 02:34:27 PM
I pretty much disagree with everything Darniaq said.

Leave your games in their default installation directories.  I've never had a problem updating them and the security features stay in effect that way too.

Clicking 'OK' one time when you install something is not a hassle and gives you the piece of mind that nothing else has been installed that you are unaware of.  Leave UAC on.

Basically, not fucking up the built-in security with your own delusional short-cuts means everything will work better, keep it patched (mines automagical) and you will barely notice you aren't using XP.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on August 31, 2009, 04:16:53 PM
This is awesome. Der Helm needs to promise he'll come back in five months to see which side he falls on  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on August 31, 2009, 06:30:15 PM
This is awesome. Der Helm needs to promise he'll come back in five months to see which side he falls on  :grin:

 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: taolurker on August 31, 2009, 07:33:33 PM
Any recommendations for an external HD enclosure kit that works with a Seagate Momentus 5400.3?  Need to (try, anyway) get data off a dead laptop.

Why bother with an enclosure?

Just get a USB adapter, it's a cheap solution to get the data, and is worthwhile to have around in case you need to wire a drive into a computer to test/access/format/copy data from drives.

Amazon kit at $12 (http://www.amazon.com/Drive-Adapter-Converter-Optical-External/dp/B001OORMVQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1251768750&sr=8-2)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on September 02, 2009, 08:20:31 AM
Quick one I never understood. Why do we buy stuff like +500watt PSU's when on full burn a generally normal desktop consumes ~210watts?

Eg: my q6600, 8800gt on full burn peaking at 207watts

Edit: 121watt idle,  +29watt full cpu load, +57watt full gpu load


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 02, 2009, 10:35:33 AM
Easier to buy a high-watt PSU than take metrics and size accordingly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 02, 2009, 10:44:35 AM
It's also incredibly hard if building the system from scratch.  You'd need a power supply with too much juice to not overtax it while testing, else it'd just power off in the middle of figuring out what you need.

And if you replace components, it gives wiggle room.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 02, 2009, 10:55:52 AM
Quick one I never understood. Why do we buy stuff like +500watt PSU's when on full burn a generally normal desktop consumes ~210watts?

Eg: my q6600, 8800gt on full burn peaking at 207watts

Edit: 121watt idle,  +29watt full cpu load, +57watt full gpu load
Your CPU load power usage is off, by a lot. At full load your CPU should be drawing ~+60W (assuming it's a newer stepping) than at idle.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 02, 2009, 03:38:00 PM
Quick one I never understood. Why do we buy stuff like +500watt PSU's when on full burn a generally normal desktop consumes ~210watts?

Eg: my q6600, 8800gt on full burn peaking at 207watts

Edit: 121watt idle,  +29watt full cpu load, +57watt full gpu load


Need to also take in the advertising aspect, I doubt you can find a PSU advertised at 250 watts that will actually produce 250 watts once it gets hot.  I would even guess that there are PSU's advertised as 300 watt that would have problems pushing 207 watts when hot.  I also doubt that you were truly maxing your systems power draw during your test, how many HD's do you have and were they fully active at the time?  How about your DVD/CD burners? USB Devices all operating at max power consumption? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on September 02, 2009, 05:37:37 PM
Well if say the EPA had everyone print the parts 65w and it was the true maximum we'd be good simple chart to build. Trippy its a G0 core so its 95w but honestly sitting idle at the desktop its consuming 122ish watt via the apc monitor then a full core load it peaks at 154ish watt. Speedstep is enabled but I wonder what C level it can drop to at idle. I'm curious so I'll grab a friends p3 kill-a-watt to see if they reach the same levels.

Also wondering the efficiency on this PSU what the true load would be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 02, 2009, 06:32:40 PM
Using a bigger PSU allows it to run more efficiently when under load, since that load is only 50% or so, which is sort of where the sweet spot for efficiency is.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 02, 2009, 07:29:21 PM
Well if say the EPA had everyone print the parts 65w and it was the true maximum we'd be good simple chart to build. Trippy its a G0 core so its 95w but honestly sitting idle at the desktop its consuming 122ish watt via the apc monitor then a full core load it peaks at 154ish watt.
That's still not right. There's no way 4 cores are only generating +8 watts each at full load. Google the power consumption figures for the Q6600. You'll see that its around +50W - 70W over idle when you are running something like Prime95 or cpuburn on all 4 cores.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 02, 2009, 07:34:47 PM
Using a bigger PSU allows it to run more efficiently when under load, since that load is only 50% or so, which is sort of where the sweet spot for efficiency is.
Another thing to remember is that different components require different voltage levels. So you have to make sure your power supply has enough Amps on each of the lines but that can mean it has "surplus" power on some of the other lines depending on your component selection. E.g. if you spec your power supply for an SLI/Crossfire system you'll usually end up with lots of surplus powers on everything but the 12V line(s).

Also unless you know you never are going to upgrade any components on your system you don't want to add a power supply that's just barely big enough cause then you can't upgrade to a CPU or GPU that requires more power.

Edit: without upgrading your power supply too


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 03, 2009, 08:03:38 AM
Then there's those 90º days...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 04, 2009, 09:49:56 AM
So...what would I have to do if I wanted to hook my 360 up to my PC, or at least use my monitor with my 360?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 10:01:42 AM
What kind of monitor is it and what inputs does it have?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 04, 2009, 10:17:02 AM
Viewsonic VX2035wm

Using the DVI currently. Has an open port that says D-SUB (?).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 04, 2009, 10:21:56 AM
Weird labeling. I assume the DSUB is the standard VGA port, so you should be able to use that. I use it on my Samsung LCD TV. You'll have to buy the VGA cable for your Xbox though.

Oh, and see if your monitor lets you switch from DVI to VGA and back, otherwise it might pick one by default if both have a signal on them. (My dell monitor lets me switch between inputs and even have a picture-in-picture with some of them).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 04, 2009, 10:24:58 AM
So if there's an option to swap between Analog and Digital, I guess that means switch between DVI and VGA (D-SUB)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 04, 2009, 10:26:27 AM
Yeah, that should be it.

Ninja edit: With the VGA cable you get a stereo jack that you can use to plug your Xbox into your sound card's input which will let you hear it on your desktop speakers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 10:36:57 AM
Does your Xbox 360 have HDMI output? If so you'll get the best quality by using an HDMI to DVI cable. You'll need a switch box or something to share it with your PC, though. Otherwise the VGA AV cable would work like Viin mentioned above.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 04, 2009, 11:16:03 AM
Yes, it does. Do such switchboxes exist, and if so, is there signal degradation in using one?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 04, 2009, 01:26:40 PM
I think they do, but I haven't been able to find one that's not overkill. There'd probably be some signal degradation, but prolly not enough to worry about unless it's a really crappy converter. But unless you are running a really large monitor I (personally) don't think it's worth it.  If you can find a not expensive switcher/converter it might be worth trying out, but it'd probably cost the same or more than the VGA cable for the xbox.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 05:42:59 PM
Yes, it does. Do such switchboxes exist, and if so, is there signal degradation in using one?
Yes they do. For what you would want to do there are two kinds. One is full blown "KVM" switch which allows one keyboard, video unit, mouse set to be shared with multiple computers. That's more than you would need since you only need to share the monitor and not the keyboard and mouse as well. There are also HDMI switch boxes for just switching the digital video component. Since DVI and HDMI are digital, signal degradation shouldn't an issue as long as your cable runs aren't too long. With VGA KVM switches you can lose some video quality depending on the quality of the electronics in the box and the video cables you are using.

I've never actually used a HDMI switch to switch between mixed HDMI and DVI inputs/outputs but it should work since the digital video electrical signals are essentially the same, it's just the connectors that are different (for the digital video part, HDMI also carries audio). However if you also need HDCP support I don't know if these boxes can interfere with that.

Edit: since


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on September 06, 2009, 09:20:47 PM
Here's a new question - is is possible to have a home network that is partly wired and partly wireless?

I have a 7-port router at home, 5 of which are permanently used (3 desktops, 360, XBMC) and 2 which are used sometimes (laptops in different rooms). I'd like to hook up a second 360 and that fucking nintendo POS (Wii) but prefer not to be running a whole lot more wires across the floor through to the living room.

I prefer to keep the 5 items that are currently wired using ethernet cables, and I need one of the extra cables for my friend's laptop that he brings to game on to avoid fucking around with wireless shit on his lappy, but I'm willing to hook up the second 360, my own lap (when I rarely bring it home from work), my wife's lap and the Wii wirelessly.

Is there any way to do this?

 :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 06, 2009, 09:31:41 PM
Sure, buy a wireless access point and plug it into your existing router. All devices that connect to it wirelessly will get DHCP from your router and will be able to communicate with any other device on the network.

If all you need is more ethernet ports, just buy a mini-switch such as a Netgear FS-108.

If you are in need of both more ports and wireless, a wireless router with DHCP and NAT off gets you an access point and a switch in one package.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 06, 2009, 09:36:15 PM
Unless you are asking for wired ports for your 360/Wii connected wirelessly to your current router? (In which case you'd need a wireless router/access point as above and then a wireless bridge for the 360/Wii).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 07, 2009, 01:47:41 AM
It might be easier just to get a new wireless router rather than a wireless access point and you'll need an Ethernet switch. That way all the network settings will be in one place rather than having to fiddle with things in two different places. Most wireless routers don't have that many RJ-45 ports (4 is a typical number) hence the need for a separate switch in your case.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on September 07, 2009, 02:23:18 AM
If I get a wireless access point, I can just connect it via RJ-45 to my existing D-Link router and everything wireless connected to it will work without a ton of dicking around? And I can secure it?

I don't get you on the switch thing?

Actually, I don't get the wireless bridge thing either.


Sorry, I just don't fully understand this kind of networking stuff. I'm pretty much just used to plug and play with ethernet, except now I have more devices than plugs, and an aversion to having 4 cables snaking across the livingroom floor.

This is also in anticipation of getting a PS3 in the next couple of months as well, and wanting to network that as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 07, 2009, 02:44:25 AM
If I get a wireless access point, I can just connect it via RJ-45 to my existing D-Link router and everything wireless connected to it will work without a ton of dicking around?
Yes you just connect it to a RJ-45 port. I've never configured a separate wireless access point (one not part of the router) before but it shouldn't be hard.

Quote
And I can secure it?
Yes as long as it supports MAC address whitelists and WPA2 (do not use WPA-TKIP) though wireless is still not as secure as a wired connection.

Quote
I don't get you on the switch thing?
Wireless routers typically only have 4 or less RJ-45 ports. You have at least 5 wired devices. So you need a switch to provide the extra ports if you went with the single wireless router option I described above.

Quote
Actually, I don't get the wireless bridge thing either.
Think of a bridge as a really dumb router that only knows how to forward packets to one place: the router it's connected to. You could setup multiple routers on your network (as full routers) but that's an unneeded complexity if you only need one LAN network.

Edit: this is also why I suggested a single wireless router (+switch) solution rather than having router and a bridge. Things are easier to configure and understand that way.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on September 07, 2009, 04:54:08 AM
OK that makes it simpler.

And I can secure it?
Yes as long as it supports MAC address whitelists and WPA2 (do not use WPA-TKIP) though wireless is still not as secure as a wired connection.

I do not understand the first part. Any specific tips to keep the network as secure as possible?


Quote
Wireless routers typically only have 4 or less RJ-45 ports. You have at least 5 wired devices. So you need a switch to provide the extra ports if you went with the single wireless router option I described above.

But the switch doesn't literally mean a switch that's toggled. It's a term, like "router", correct?


Quote
Think of a bridge as a really dumb router that only knows how to forward packets to one place: the router it's connected to. You could setup multiple routers on your network (as full routers) but that's an unneeded complexity if you only need one LAN network.

Edit: this is also why I suggested a single wireless router (+switch) solution rather than having router and a bridge. Things are easier to configure and understand that way.

I get you there, I just don't want to bin my existing router which has worked without a hitch. I just want to "add on" some wirelessness. Come to think of it. I actually want to keep 6 devices wired. 3 desktops, 360, XBMC and a wire for my mate's laptop



Actually - Option B - Staying Wired?
Is it possible to, say, unplug the RJ45 cable that links my 360 to my router on the 360's side and plug in a switch/router/magic box in the home entertainment unit, and then run a bunch of short RJ-45 cables to the second 360/PS3/Wii/etc?

So one end in the router, one end in a "hub"(switch/whatever), and the consoles all connected to the "hub".

Would the consoles all still have their own network identities and work online/offline together? I'm wanting to set up my second 360 as a machine for my wife on the second TV in the lounge, so we can play system-link co-op games via LAN, or even via XBL.

If you could let me know what I actually would need to buy for the wireless option, and/or the wired option (if it is actually doable). I'd probably prefer the wired option, actually.

http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalog/default.php?cPath=67_103


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 07, 2009, 06:12:19 AM
And I can secure it?
Yes as long as it supports MAC address whitelists and WPA2 (do not use WPA-TKIP) though wireless is still not as secure as a wired connection.
I do not understand the first part. Any specific tips to keep the network as secure as possible?
Every Ethernet adapter has a global unique identifier -- its MAC address. By entering the MAC addresses of your devices into a "white list" on the wireless bridge/router only those MAC addresses will be able to connect. Note that you can "spoof" MAC addresses so this isn't a guarantee to lock out non-authorized devices from using your wireless connection.

Quote
Quote
Wireless routers typically only have 4 or less RJ-45 ports. You have at least 5 wired devices. So you need a switch to provide the extra ports if you went with the single wireless router option I described above.
But the switch doesn't literally mean a switch that's toggled. It's a term, like "router", correct?
It's more like an old fashioned telephone switchboard than a toggle but toggle works as well depending on how you define the word but none of that is important really (though I end up explaining below). Just think of it as box you can use to increase the number of RJ-45 ports you can use to connect things to your router with.

Quote
Actually - Option B - Staying Wired?
Is it possible to, say, unplug the RJ45 cable that links my 360 to my router on the 360's side and plug in a switch/router/magic box in the home entertainment unit, and then run a bunch of short RJ-45 cables to the second 360/PS3/Wii/etc?

So one end in the router, one end in a "hub"(switch/whatever), and the consoles all connected to the "hub".
In technical terms a hub is different than a switch. A hub broadcasts all packets going through the hub to all ports on the hub. A switch only sends the packets addressed to a particular device on a port to that port (hence the telephone switchboard metaphor). Unless you happen to need to do some packet sniffing on a separate box you'll want to get a switch instead of a hub for performance reasons.

If you've run out of RJ-45 ports on your router and every device you want to hook up to it is within reasonable cable length then yes all you have to do is get an Ethernet switch, plug a cable between it and the router and then plug whatever extra devices you want into the switch. I'd recommend getting a Gigabit Ethernet switch if you can afford it if you have more than one device that uses Gigabit Ethernet just for the performance boost. Note, though, that if your router's Ethernet ports aren't Gigabit Ethernet you'll need to move all your Gigabit Ethernet devices onto the Gigabit switch. The non-Gigabit devices can stay on the router or you can move them to the switch, the switch doesn't care (you can mix speeds on it).

Quote
Would the consoles all still have their own network identities and work online/offline together? I'm wanting to set up my second 360 as a machine for my wife on the second TV in the lounge, so we can play system-link co-op games via LAN, or even via XBL.
Adding a switch is conceptually just like adding additional Ethernet ports onto your router (ignoring the Gigabit Ethernet part of things). You don't need to configure the switch or anything, it just works.

Quote
If you could let me know what I actually would need to buy for the wireless option, and/or the wired option (if it is actually doable). I'd probably prefer the wired option, actually.

http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalog/default.php?cPath=67_103
If you don't have any Gigabit Ethernet devices these would work fine for a pure wired solution:

http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=67_103&products_id=14504
http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=67_103&products_id=14619

You can drop down the 5 port models if you only need 3 extra ports.

If you do have more than one thing with Gigabit Ethernet you'll want something like these:

http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=67_103&products_id=14562
http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=67_103&products_id=14606

or the 8-port model if you need more than 3 extra ports.

To figure out how many ports you need on your switch you count of the wired devices you want to connect. Then you count the ports on your router. If the router has fewer ports than you need then the formula is:

Total devices to connect wired <= (Ports on router - 1) + (Ports on switch - 1)

Connecting a switch to your router uses up a port on each device, hence the "-1"s. E.g. if your router has 4 ports and the switch has 5 ports then you can connect a total of 7 devices. An 8-port switch would allow up to 10 devices (4 + 8 - 2).


If you wanted to go wireless I would need to know if you have any Wireless-N devices before I could recommend something from that site.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 07, 2009, 08:42:14 AM
If you wanted to connect the Wii with a wire, you would need to buy a USB ethernet adapter. Of course, unless you already have the XBox wireless adaptor, you would need to buy that to connect the XBox wirelessly. You can run ethernet wiring pretty much any distance in a typical home as the maximum segment length is 100meters. I have never heard of anyone using one of those USB-ethernet adapters for the Wii, but every customer I have dealt with who has an X-Box connected to our networks wirelessly has had problems. The 360 wireless adapter is about 3x the price of those Wii adapters too.

If you are looking for wireless anyway, but want wired to all the contraptions on your entertainment center, I would probably run one cable along the walls (you can buy cable by the foot from many places, in a variety of colors and either put ends on yourself, or take it into a computer store and they can probably do it for you for a couple bucks) and buy a wireless router to put on the entertainment center. Then I would turn all the routing functions off on it if you are liking your existing router.

I think Trippy and I could both probably come up with half a dozen elegant solutions to your problem. I think we probably need to know more of how much you want to spend to get a better idea.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on September 08, 2009, 01:16:06 AM
Prerferring at this point to not spend too much money -
The house is a rental, and the computers and router are on a diagonal to the area in the living room where the TV and consoles are. We've got one cable and that's managable, I just want to avoid multiples, so having a switch over at the home entertainment unit is the best solution at this stage. My concern with a switch was that it would be like trying to share one of the router's ip addresses into several devices, but if as Trippy says it's just like adding more ports, than that it the ideal solution for the time being (until we move).

I think I'll stick with my 7-port router and just buy the 8-point switch and keep it over near the consoles. Buy the ethernet adaptor for the Wii and be done with it (I'd either have to wireless the 360 or wire the Wii) until I'm setting up my new house. At that point I can look at Gigabit Ethernet stuff - this PC I am typing on has it, not sure about the wife's PC, but we'll buy a new PC shortly afer we move anyway and so just get a gigabit router then.

Once we've got the new house, it'll be time to start cabling up the walls and everything in sight.  :grin: :drill:

I assume none of the 360/ps3/wii use Gigabit?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 08, 2009, 03:08:54 AM
The PS3, as has been the case, has the better hardware and does in fact have Gigabit Ethernet. The Xbox 360 only has Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps) and the Wii's USB Ethernet Adapter is also Fast Ethernet (USB 2.0 isn't fast enough to support Gigabit Ethernet, 480 Mbps is the limit of USB 2.0).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 08, 2009, 07:01:47 AM
TKIP has a lot of problems or is just not as good as WPA2?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 08, 2009, 07:09:03 AM
WPA/TKIP can supposedly be cracked in less than a minute (http://jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/paper/A%20Practical%20Message%20Falsification%20Attack%20on%20WPA.pdf) now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 08, 2009, 07:31:33 AM
Sigh.  Thanks for the link.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on September 08, 2009, 09:10:29 AM
WPA/TKIP can supposedly be cracked in less than a minute (http://jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/paper/A%20Practical%20Message%20Falsification%20Attack%20on%20WPA.pdf) now.

I'm not sure if I'm reading that right but it appears to me that the proposed attack requires that the client be out of range of the access point or otherwise cutoff from the access point.

If you're just worried about your home network it doesn't look to me like a credible threat but if it's just a matter of clicking WPA2 (or WPA + AES) on the router config then why not just do that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 08, 2009, 11:44:29 AM
I don't think all of my devices can do WPA2 or AES, I just know TKIP works and I can remember the password I set.  Not that I'm worried too much, really: if someone is close enough to my house to tap my wireless network, I'll be able to see him.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on September 08, 2009, 01:21:54 PM
From looking around a little more it appears that if you set your key renewal time for TKIP to 120 seconds it pretty much foils this particular attack.

I don't know how much that will affect connection quality but it seems like a reasonable stopgap for a home network until you get a chance to upgrade.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 08, 2009, 04:52:52 PM
The researchers of that paper are going to present a practical example of that attack at a conference at the end of September. We'll know more about how you would actually do it "in the wild" then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on September 09, 2009, 01:25:06 AM
Thanks guys, got my wife to pick up a switch and some more patch cables on her way home. Fun weekend of wiring coming soon!



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 13, 2009, 11:16:07 AM
Really weird one.

Just moved into my new place. Internet connection seems to work fine, but Steam games are having a fit:

World in Conflict just will not launch
TF2 has a hell of a time actually connecting to a server, and when it did, it locked up in less than a hour.
Left 4 Dead will connect, and immediately time out.


No idea what the problem is. Could it be a port block-type of problem? Pings seem to be fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 13, 2009, 01:02:20 PM
Who is your ISP/what type of service?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 13, 2009, 03:51:26 PM
That's a good question. I'll have to ask building management after I fool around with this some more.

I just hope it doesn't bring on unwanted questions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 14, 2009, 05:48:07 AM
I just hope it doesn't bring on unwanted questions.
I'm wondering, if perhaps, you could be more needlessly paranoid.

What, pray tell, could be an "unwanted question?"



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 14, 2009, 07:56:41 AM
What, pray tell, could be an "unwanted question?"

"WHERE'S MAH RENT?"


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on September 14, 2009, 08:23:51 AM
More like, "Do you actually pay have an account with the ISP?"

Cause, you know, it doesn't sound like it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 14, 2009, 04:09:57 PM
Comes with the room.

I just don't want to explain what I am doing with the connection.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 14, 2009, 04:51:09 PM
If it comes with the rent, and the property does not support it themselves, your ISP will have its own policies about how to deal with "what you do." If it is just playing video games, no one at the ISPs (well, except the upper management if you are AT&T) cares, they may ask you what games you are playing to make sure it isn't being mis-categorized in QoS, but other than that they could care less if it is not detrimental to their network as a whole. Generate a ton of traffic which fucks with the stability of their network, and they will probably shut you down without warning.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 14, 2009, 08:12:49 PM
Oddly enough, I get home today, and all problems are resolved.  :grin:

Weird.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on September 15, 2009, 02:46:06 PM
Comes with the room.

I just don't want to explain what I am doing with the connection.

Put shoe on head!  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: RUiN 427 on September 16, 2009, 05:56:06 PM
Thinking about getting a second 360 for another room in my house, for convenience reasons. Wondering if anyone has any experience with xbox live "account roaming" with a memory unit. Looking for an effortless solution for when the lady wants to watch her shows on the big tv and I want to play some games. The information i have found elsewhere is pretty vague. Any help would be appreciated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 16, 2009, 05:58:35 PM
Comes with the room.

I just don't want to explain what I am doing with the connection.
Paranoia Paranoia everybody's coming to get me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on September 16, 2009, 10:23:24 PM
Thinking about getting a second 360 for another room in my house, for convenience reasons. Wondering if anyone has any experience with xbox live "account roaming" with a memory unit. Looking for an effortless solution for when the lady wants to watch her shows on the big tv and I want to play some games. The information i have found elsewhere is pretty vague. Any help would be appreciated.

I now have 2 360s set up, but I'm not sure what you're asking exactly?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 17, 2009, 09:45:23 AM
Comes with the room.

I just don't want to explain what I am doing with the connection.
:hello_thar: :hello_kitty_2:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on September 17, 2009, 10:46:34 AM
Thinking about getting a second 360 for another room in my house, for convenience reasons. Wondering if anyone has any experience with xbox live "account roaming" with a memory unit. Looking for an effortless solution for when the lady wants to watch her shows on the big tv and I want to play some games. The information i have found elsewhere is pretty vague. Any help would be appreciated.

If you are just trying to log in with your XBOX Live account then, you can just do that.  It will be stored on the HDD and you can log in with it whenever you want.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: RUiN 427 on September 17, 2009, 11:12:58 AM
Thinking about getting a second 360 for another room in my house, for convenience reasons. Wondering if anyone has any experience with xbox live "account roaming" with a memory unit. Looking for an effortless solution for when the lady wants to watch her shows on the big tv and I want to play some games. The information i have found elsewhere is pretty vague. Any help would be appreciated.

If you are just trying to log in with your XBOX Live account then, you can just do that.  It will be stored on the HDD and you can log in with it whenever you want.

and just use an MU for the game saves and stuff?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 11:15:55 AM
Assuming it lets you copy the saves.  Some are bound to be set to not allow copying.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jobu on September 18, 2009, 03:41:14 PM
I'm starting to evaluate building a new computer for the wife. Her biggest issue is all the third party cases are all ugly (I generally agree). She likes the candy colored Inspirons you can buy at Dell, but that stuff is a few generations behind (hence the custom build idea).

I found this case (http://www.atxcases.com/Cases/images/100/kitty/kitty-03.jpg) online but it's not actually for sale anywhere. The website I linked is horribly outdated, but she instantly fell in love with it. Anyone got any links or ideas on where to find equally "cute" cases?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on September 18, 2009, 03:59:46 PM
You sure that's a model and not a CAD rendering? I'm a few years out of practice, but there are things about that image that remind me of the kind of product renderings I used to pump out.

Not that this answers your need of course. Just curious :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jobu on September 18, 2009, 04:05:21 PM
You sure that's a model and not a CAD rendering? I'm a few years out of practice, but there are things about that image that remind me of the kind of product renderings I used to pump out.

Not that this answers your need of course. Just curious :-)

Pretty sure.

Inside Guts (http://www.atxcases.com/Cases/images/100/kitty/kitty-04.jpg)
Also a Doggy variant (http://nuxx.net/gallery/v/computers/newcomputer/doggie/). It looks like they were all made back in the P4 era.

But really, it's very hard to find cases that aren't marketed to the piano-finished-black-high-end-A/V crowd, or the oversized-silk-anime-flame-shirt crowd.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on September 18, 2009, 04:12:04 PM
Ok, I'm officially old.  :awesome_for_real:

I like your demographics titles though :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 18, 2009, 07:43:54 PM
reminds me of the old crappy compaq presario cases.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on September 21, 2009, 07:28:26 PM
Anyone have a working link to the Razer DeathAdder drivers from any webpage?  The official site is SHIT, and the downloads page is down.  Vista64 version.  I've searched everywhere and my googlefu is failing.

Nevermind.  Got it working. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on September 24, 2009, 07:23:38 AM
Edit: Found the drivers

Next question. Are there possible software reasons why my LAN - Connection displays "no cable connected" ?

This is my motherboad (http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=4Core1600Twins-P35&s=n) , I am trying to use the onboard LAN because I just got a new fibre optic cable connection installed.

edit: onboard LAN is enabled  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 26, 2009, 10:32:39 AM
No cable connected means there is no electrical link (or optical in the case of fiber) to the other side.

Make sure the device you are plugging into is working. It may be that your NIC or the port it is plugged into is fried and the port does not work.

Occasionally, it can be a driver issue, but that is very rare. A "media state disconnected" issue is no link at all. Limited or no connection would mean that you get a link but you are unable to pull an address for some reason.

If you are plugging into a home router or a switch, try rebooting the device/trying another port/another cable. If it is plugging directly into whatever fiber-converter you were supplied, you might want to power cycle that as well.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on September 28, 2009, 12:07:32 PM
Fixed, after trying sever cable I decided to look for even more new drivers and found them. Works like a charm now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on September 29, 2009, 11:06:22 AM
In the last few days, my FHD2400 has been exhibiting some strange behavior.  I notice it on black backgrounds the most.  If I were to type something, then backspace a few spots to correct a typo or erase what I wrong, I'd get dots where I backspaced over.  So, 'backspace' would like like 'back.....'.

Bad graphics card or monitor trying to take a crap?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 29, 2009, 01:48:53 PM
I would lean towards graphics card, but cannot say for certain.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 02, 2009, 11:25:09 AM
Awesome.

Speaking of video cards, anyone have an idea when the Nvidia DX11 cards are coming out?  Not looking to buy a DX11 card yet, but just trying to get a ballpark idea when the current high end cards will drop in price.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 02, 2009, 11:29:30 AM
Speaking of video cards, anyone have an idea when the Nvidia DX11 cards are coming out?  Not looking to buy a DX11 card yet, but just trying to get a ballpark idea when the current high end cards will drop in price.
Supposedly this December.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 11, 2009, 06:38:13 PM
Anyone have a lead on a quick and dirty way to convert ogg vorbis files into something usable on an ipod?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 11, 2009, 06:56:53 PM
If you are using iTunes you can install the Ogg/Xiph QuickTime component and then iTunes can convert the files to AAC/MP4 format.

http://www.xiph.org/quicktime/download.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 12, 2009, 05:31:23 PM
Good stuff, now I just have to figure out how to clean up the mess iTunes makes.  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on October 20, 2009, 06:35:07 AM
I think(don't have the cash yet) I sold my current desktop system q6600/8800gt for a tidy little sum, now mulling over on what to do. Wait to see Nvidia's new products change the video card market pricing. Or more disturbingly wait till late q1 2010 to see the 32nm i5's (http://news.softpedia.com/images/news2/Intel-039-s-Upcoming-Core-i3-i5-i7-Lineup-Unveiled-3.jpg). I have a e2180 + nvidia 8something crap that can tide me over so in no big rush and only borderlands I want to play soon which i doubt will be demanding.

So wait?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 20, 2009, 06:42:21 AM
What?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on October 20, 2009, 06:46:34 AM
What?

Looking for recommendation, buy an i5-750/ATI HD5570 or wait?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 20, 2009, 06:52:23 AM
You answered your own question. There will always be something better/cheaper/faster if you wait. If what you have now works fine then there's no reason to get something new now unless you have to spend the money now, for some reason.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jimbo on October 20, 2009, 03:52:53 PM
Got mad as hell at my LINKSYS WAP54G, it went belly up after a 1 year, then the replacement went bad after 3 months, so I dug out my old Linksys wired router and got some cable and drilled some holes and was back surfing the net again.  It is only a 10/100, is the D-Link (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833127060) or Cisco (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124091) 10/100/1000 worth getting?  I have a decent cable speed and I have the 10/100/1000 on my motherboards.  Plus I found a good price on Cat 6 cable that I'll install when it gets here (and finish up with the cable covers & paint them to match the walls I think), so I don't mind spending the extra money for a decent wired router anyway.  The D-Link is cheaper and seems to be more popular and I really would like a break from Linksys/Cisco products I think.

Oh yeah, I'm sure I made 2 of my neighbors made, the little bastards were stealing my connection and I hadn't noticed till about a week ago...the whole damn linksys security system was nuty to set up anyway...so glad I'm back on wired route.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 20, 2009, 05:12:21 PM
If you are transferring large files (as in gigabytes) between two computers Gigabit Ethernet makes a huge difference. If that's your only computer or you only transfer documents and stuff Fast Ethernet is plenty.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 21, 2009, 07:39:38 AM
More importantly it isn't going to make the internet any faster.  If you are streaming within your home network it might be nice to have.  Also a wired connection has less overhead and a much larger portion of the bandwidth will be used for your data, so your 100mbit wired will probably be a noticeable improvement over the 54g you were using.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on October 23, 2009, 11:09:57 AM
Hey Trippy, what do you think of this (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833162026) router?  I've been thinking of upgrading to wireless N for a while and I want to get 2 of these and use one as a bridge in the living room for the Xbox 360, and laptops and the other in the home office with the cable modem.

Do you see an obvious issue that I am missing?  I.e. why the $35 price tag?

Edit: beaten by bbcode :(


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 23, 2009, 01:11:03 PM
According to one review you'll have to wire the two together to get the 2nd one to act as a bridge. That may not be what you are trying to do. I don't know anything about how good Buffalo's wireless products are.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on October 23, 2009, 06:49:47 PM
I was hoping the DD-WRT firmware would fix that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 23, 2009, 08:27:27 PM
I am pretty sure dd-wrt can do that but I haven't looked into it.
(http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/85916/ddwrt1.png)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on October 25, 2009, 11:35:24 AM
I was hoping the DD-WRT firmware would fix that.

DD-WRT is unstable (http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=58949) for it at best at the moment. The client bridge mode (ie wifi client bridging same subnets) only seen work on WRT-54's. On a WRT160N on client mode is accessible but you use the "bridge" part so you have to use a different subnet.

The WRT-320N (http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=58566) is highly experimental but looks like a final replacement for my wrt54gl's.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 26, 2009, 10:47:37 AM
Ick.  I'll wait on that. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 30, 2009, 01:26:56 PM
Storage questions:

I'm organizing 10 years of digital photos.  I'm thinking about getting an external HDD to store them all on.  The goal would be to make the drive read-only so it can be used on any PC in the house but it should also be good enough equipment that it will last a long time. 

Any other ideas for this come to mind?  What about HDD brands on externals?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 30, 2009, 04:44:04 PM
how much space is it taking up?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 30, 2009, 08:47:08 PM
It's growing almost exponentially.  It's only 15gig now, but easily 10 of that has been in the last year since we dropped $1000 on a new digital SLR. 

I suppose if I need to I can just burn the stuff down to CDs/DVDs, but I was hoping for an all in one solution. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 30, 2009, 09:40:06 PM
It's growing almost exponentially.  It's only 15gig now, but easily 10 of that has been in the last year since we dropped $1000 on a new digital SLR. 

I suppose if I need to I can just burn the stuff down to CDs/DVDs, but I was hoping for an all in one solution. 

I was going to suggest getting a blu-ray burner.  Not sure why you want it to be read only.  Have you considered a NAS device.  I think Buffalo has 500mb & 1gb solutions targeted at the home user for a few hundred $$.  You will still need to back whatever you do up though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 31, 2009, 09:54:06 AM
Yeah, I'm guessing CD/DVD is going to be the way to go then.  Since my wife and kid have access to the discs I wanted a read only option so they can't go jacking up the masters.  Best way is with CD/DVD-r I suppose. 

Thanks for the advice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on October 31, 2009, 06:04:00 PM
Probably building a new PC in a month-ish.

Should I go with XP, or Win7? (XP would be free and totally legit, Win7 would be an extra couple of hundred bucks).


What's Win7's compatability like with games/older games? Any issues?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 02, 2009, 07:18:14 AM
Nebu, hard drives are cheap, you should just get a big external and dump it on there. Then burn it to optical for longer-term storage. Depending on the importance, don't forget you may want an off-site backup (in a lockbox or at a relative's or whatever). I've been using WDs lately, black for performance, green for low-power. The new black chassis elements drives are sleek and cool-looking, we just got a pair of TB externals for digitized documents.

Az, I love Win7 so far. You can get home premium for $107 from the egg, OEM version (tied to that machine). I've yet to find a problem with it, running LotRO, EQ2, Torchlight Demo and Borderlands. It actually fixed a persistent crash issue in EQ2 for me!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on November 02, 2009, 10:10:46 AM
anyone have experience with SVN?  I'm thinking of getting an external drive to host a repository.  Would that work or does one really need a separate box?  I don't really need access outside my LAN.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 02, 2009, 10:51:12 AM
Why do you need a drive just for SVN?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on November 02, 2009, 08:05:13 PM
ultimately just for safety -- I'd like a dedicated platter and an other backup platter.  From experience, sadly.  And my other internal drives are already full'ish.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 02, 2009, 08:07:14 PM
It'd be pretty easy to setup an SVN repository on your local drive and have it backed up to .. anything really. Dropbox, iDisk, another HD, whatever. Just do a normal automated backup routine.

You could also use a 3rd party SVN provider such as www.unfuddle.com - you can get a free account if you don't need a lot of room and only 2 accounts to access the SVN.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 03, 2009, 06:42:10 AM
Anyone know of a quick wee application that can count amounts of files in a structure ?

I'm looking for a count of xls files on a server.  Windows is shite for that kinda thing (unless you know different...)



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 03, 2009, 07:39:17 AM
Try http://windirstat.info I believe it will analyse useage by file type.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 03, 2009, 07:40:56 AM
Can't you just search by *.xls in the normal Windows search window and view the number of files in the status bar when it's done?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 03, 2009, 08:01:09 AM
Finance firm.  I have over a quarter of a million files.

So, no.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on November 03, 2009, 08:16:24 AM
Anyone know of a quick wee application that can count amounts of files in a structure ?

I'm looking for a count of xls files on a server.  Windows is shite for that kinda thing (unless you know different...)



dir /b /s *.xls > xlscount.txt

will give you a list of all the files (and their path, one to a line) in a file called xlscount.txt

Windows doesn't have a 'wc' command otherwise counting would be trivial however then you can do something like

find /c ".xls" xlscount.txt

which will count all the lines that have .xls in it in the file xlscount.txt and display that on the screen

In my case from where I launched the search the output I got was

-------- XLSCOUNT.TXT: 133

which seems right.

YMMV, free internet help and all.

edit: in UNIX you would do:

\>find . -name "*.xls" -print | wc -l


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 03, 2009, 09:06:17 AM
Try http://windirstat.info I believe it will analyse useage by file type.

Fucking lovely.

Cheers mate.

Thanks also to the other advisors.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 03, 2009, 10:53:03 PM
glad to be of service!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 08, 2009, 11:27:22 AM
Anyone know if current motherboards can handle two PCI-E video cards that aren't SLIed/CrossFired together?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 09, 2009, 05:15:20 AM
Sorry to jump in, I have another question.

Company has a lot of Word Documents with a particular logo and brand (I mean a lot of Word documents.)

Lo and behold, new images and footers and wee fiddly bits are needed as part of the rebrand.

How the hell does one make sure that the old letters have the new style ?  If it was in Powerpoint, I could apply a style globablly to a master, but in Word it seems NOT TO BE THERE.

Help me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on November 09, 2009, 06:59:08 AM
New quick question:

From what i can see, windows 7 will give you the option to install either a 32 or 64 bit version of the OS off of one Product Key.  Does anyone know if Windows XP was the same way?

I have an XP Pro product key, and my current system is 32 bit.  Getting a new PC very soon, and would like to know if I can just download a 64 bit XP install disk and switch to 64 bit when the new machine is ready.  Or would i need a 64 bit specific Product key for that?

Yeah, i know, I should go Win 7, but I cant justify spending 200 to 300 bucks on a retail install package for that just yet, and I will probably have the machine ready to go before i can get around to trying to score a copy of Win 7 through one of my colledge buddies and a student discount.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kageh on November 09, 2009, 07:03:58 AM
Anyone know if current motherboards can handle two PCI-E video cards that aren't SLIed/CrossFired together?

Depends on what you want to do with them. I think it is possible to use an Nvidia something for PhysX in addition to a regular video card, on most motherboards with two PCI-E slots. I can't think of other scenarios aside from SLI/Crossfire or that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 09, 2009, 09:42:17 AM
Anyone know if current motherboards can handle two PCI-E video cards that aren't SLIed/CrossFired together?

Depends on what you want to do with them. I think it is possible to use an Nvidia something for PhysX in addition to a regular video card, on most motherboards with two PCI-E slots. I can't think of other scenarios aside from SLI/Crossfire or that.
probably wants to run 4 monitors

New quick question:

From what i can see, windows 7 will give you the option to install either a 32 or 64 bit version of the OS off of one Product Key.  Does anyone know if Windows XP was the same way?

I have an XP Pro product key, and my current system is 32 bit.  Getting a new PC very soon, and would like to know if I can just download a 64 bit XP install disk and switch to 64 bit when the new machine is ready.  Or would i need a 64 bit specific Product key for that?

Yeah, i know, I should go Win 7, but I cant justify spending 200 to 300 bucks on a retail install package for that just yet, and I will probably have the machine ready to go before i can get around to trying to score a copy of Win 7 through one of my colledge buddies and a student discount.
I seem to recall Microsoft offering a 1 way/1 time trade to upgrade your 32bit XP Pro for 64bit XP Pro, but it has been awhile so I may be remembering that wrong.  Either way XP 64 bit is a really really bad OS, if you are planning on using it as your main workstation you should probably stick with XP 32 bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 09, 2009, 10:53:18 AM
Anyone know if current motherboards can handle two PCI-E video cards that aren't SLIed/CrossFired together?

Depends on what you want to do with them. I think it is possible to use an Nvidia something for PhysX in addition to a regular video card, on most motherboards with two PCI-E slots. I can't think of other scenarios aside from SLI/Crossfire or that.
probably wants to run 4 monitors

Just 2. Figured I could put my aux monitor on my second (crappier) Nvidia card, with my primary card dedicated to my primary display for games. But if that doesn't work I may try the PhysX dedicated card, as that sounds interesting as well (though I donno if my crappier Nvidia card supports PhysX).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on November 09, 2009, 03:58:40 PM
I seem to recall Microsoft offering a 1 way/1 time trade to upgrade your 32bit XP Pro for 64bit XP Pro, but it has been awhile so I may be remembering that wrong.  Either way XP 64 bit is a really really bad OS, if you are planning on using it as your main workstation you should probably stick with XP 32 bit.
Well, thing is, my new machine will have 6 gigs of ram (tripple channel memory), and i would like to take advantage of all of it.  If i did stick with XP 32 bit, is it going to be unstable trying to deal with more memory then it can properly access, or will it just ignore the extra ram it can't use?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 09, 2009, 06:19:18 PM
I seem to recall Microsoft offering a 1 way/1 time trade to upgrade your 32bit XP Pro for 64bit XP Pro, but it has been awhile so I may be remembering that wrong.  Either way XP 64 bit is a really really bad OS, if you are planning on using it as your main workstation you should probably stick with XP 32 bit.
Well, thing is, my new machine will have 6 gigs of ram (tripple channel memory), and i would like to take advantage of all of it.  If i did stick with XP 32 bit, is it going to be unstable trying to deal with more memory then it can properly access, or will it just ignore the extra ram it can't use?

It just ignores it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 10, 2009, 12:03:24 AM
Nevermind I'm an idiot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Redgiant on November 11, 2009, 12:54:56 PM
I seem to recall Microsoft offering a 1 way/1 time trade to upgrade your 32bit XP Pro for 64bit XP Pro, but it has been awhile so I may be remembering that wrong.  Either way XP 64 bit is a really really bad OS, if you are planning on using it as your main workstation you should probably stick with XP 32 bit.
Well, thing is, my new machine will have 6 gigs of ram (tripple channel memory), and i would like to take advantage of all of it.  If i did stick with XP 32 bit, is it going to be unstable trying to deal with more memory then it can properly access, or will it just ignore the extra ram it can't use?

It just ignores it.

"Go directly to Win7. Do not pass XP64 or Vista, do not collect lose $200."

That is how you use your 6 Gb.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 15, 2009, 05:13:34 PM
Phew, what a way to spend a Sunday. A corrupted bios can lead to all sorts of fun methodic hardware testing! Fun for you and your ulcer!

Long story short, in the process of switching out CPUs to test -that- element, I broke the small little connector pin on one of the 4 push-insert-snap-on thingies on my CPU cooler. I'm going to have to replace the whole danged thing, since I can't see an easy way of replacing the pin 'element'.

So, anyone have a suggestion for an aftermarket LGA 755 socket CPU cooler? I don't OC, but the current one in there, the factory cooler, isn't all that great.

My preference is to not have to remove the MOBO to install it. I know, this means I'm stuck with the dreadely awful intel push-pin mechanism, but I'll live till I upgrade to another system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 16, 2009, 09:03:05 AM
Honestly, I found yanking the motherboard to get a permanent fan mount was worth never having to deal with a push pin again.  Whomever designed them is sponsored by all that is Evil and Unholy.

Thirty minutes of futzing only to have the damn fan pop off within the week?  No thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 16, 2009, 12:26:26 PM
Ok, assuming I'm willing to cave and unscrew the mobo to do this, what CPU fan do you recommend? I've been out of the loop in this dept for 2 years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 16, 2009, 01:16:30 PM
I have a Xigmatek fan (push-pin out of the box so I had to get a mounting bracket from them as well).  It's worked well and is quiet.  I don't know much about fans though, so I can't say which would be the best brand overall.

Whatever you get, make sure a mounting bracket is included or available.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 16, 2009, 01:44:33 PM
Hah, that's the cooler I have. The pushpin broke. So you can order the bracket mount? Did you get it from newegg?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 16, 2009, 03:49:38 PM
Hah, that's the cooler I have. The pushpin broke. So you can order the bracket mount? Did you get it from newegg?
Yes, both were from Newegg.  Make sure you get the correct type though.  Some match the 4-pipe mounts and some the 3-pipe.  I had to search a bit to find the one for mine as they had it categorized incorrectly at the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 21, 2009, 11:29:31 AM
Well, I took your advice, Lanty. I got the right bracket (thanks for the heads up on the 3 vs 4 pipe) and I just got done installing the bish. Sure enough, as mentioned, the factory cooler push-pin mount had indeed popped out on one corner. I had temps verging on nearly 70 degrees running prime95. Crezy hot. The factory fan was throttling up to 2000 rpm to keep it down.

Now, I've run prime95 under the Xigmatek, screw mounted. With an ambient temp of 36, the fan throttles from a low of 1000 to 1200 under full load, with temps staying at 50 under continuous full load, idling at 38. In other words, a vast improvement (granted, with the borky pushpin coming out, even the factory cooler couldn't do its job).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lac on November 21, 2009, 12:45:57 PM
Do I need cooling on a 10k rpm disk (http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=494)?
I run ashampoo hdd control to keep an eye on the health of my disks and it tells me 42° C is too hot. My data disk (http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=610) runs at 38° and apparently that's cool enough for the software.
I'm asking because I remember seeing those velociraptors packed in a 3.5 tray heatsink. Mine is a naked 2.5 suspended in a 3.5 slot with elastic bands to reduce noise.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 21, 2009, 08:58:37 PM
Now, I've run prime95 under the Xigmatek, screw mounted. With an ambient temp of 36, the fan throttles from a low of 1000 to 1200 under full load, with temps staying at 50 under continuous full load, idling at 38. In other words, a vast improvement (granted, with the borky pushpin coming out, even the factory cooler couldn't do its job).
I'm glad it's working so well for you.

Do I need cooling on a 10k rpm disk (http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=494)?
lac, if it's a 4 degree difference then it sounds like it's just where the program is set to warn.  If you can fit it and you have a concern though, then sure, why not?  $20 for a reusable cooler which might save you HD degredation is probably worth it.  That's why I bought two heat-pipe HD coolers.  (Unfortunately they are not compatible with my current case, so I'm not using them.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on November 22, 2009, 05:35:45 AM
Well, I know through experience that some HDD's will shut themselves off at 180F.  Interpret that how you want.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 22, 2009, 09:03:05 AM
This is a bit ma-and-pa, but my first instinct is to attatch a bunch of VGA heatsinks like these (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835708008). Just siphoning off the heat onto the cooling fins might be enough to keep the disk safe.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lac on November 23, 2009, 12:50:35 AM
It seems that when the disk came out, people would remove the drive from it's cooling tray and suspend it to reduce noise. After a while Wester Digital started selling the drives without cooling tray so people wouldn't void their warranties by removing it. That's the model I ended up with.
A silent pc is pretty much my number one concern so I'll stick with the naked drive for now and see what the temperature does during next summer. Thanks for the info.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Thrawn on November 23, 2009, 10:05:40 AM
So I'm thinking of picking up an external HD for my wife for Christmas, she really wants one for storing her photography on.

How sturdy are these drives usually?  As much as she will say she'll take care of it I know in time it will just be something she probably tosses in her purse as she heads out the door.  Any particular brands I should look for or avoid?  I know I've quit buying WD internal drives because I've had so many problems with them.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 23, 2009, 10:19:56 AM
So I'm thinking of picking up an external HD for my wife for Christmas, she really wants one for storing her photography on.

How sturdy are these drives usually?  As much as she will say she'll take care of it I know in time it will just be something she probably tosses in her purse as she heads out the door.  Any particular brands I should look for or avoid?  I know I've quit buying WD internal drives because I've had so many problems with them.

I have the Maxtor Onetouch III Mini drive and it is great.  I left it in the console of my truck for 6 months (during our record temp summer) and have had no issues.  I don't think I have dropped it yet though.  Best part of this drive is it is 100% USB powered, this is much easier to haul around than a solution that requires a power cord or even worse a brick.  It comes with a  2 foot USB Y cable to draw some extra juice from a 2nd USB port if needed but I haven't needed the 2nd hookup yet.

As much as I like this drive I think if I had to do it over again I'd go for a 64 gig USB stick, in theory that should be much more durable as well as being far more portable.

edit: I have the 160gb model, the Onetouch Mini 4 also offers 250gb and 320gb models.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 23, 2009, 10:26:35 AM
I'll also suggest the smaller ones which do not require additional power.  At least in my case there is a bad power circuit at my wife's office that eats external drives.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 24, 2009, 09:01:14 AM
A silent pc is pretty much my number one concern so I'll stick with the naked drive for now and see what the temperature does during next summer. Thanks for the info.
This is out of order, but the concept of what I meant.  No fans, no noise, and if they do fit your case provide vibration damping.  I think mine are Zalman:  HD cooler (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835199002&cm_re=disk_heat_pipe_cooler-_-35-199-002-_-Product)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on November 27, 2009, 08:11:54 PM
Win7 / Latest Firefox beta.

When I click on a web page, a little flashing text thing will show up to the right of whatever I clicked - like I can type. Page Up, Page Down, Home, and End don't work, which is often how I browse forums. It's driving me fucking bonkers.

Halp.

Edit: IE works properly. No plugins, tried another theme for Firefox, still broken.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on November 27, 2009, 09:06:18 PM
Fixed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 29, 2009, 07:06:18 AM
Have not looked in this thread for about a month, missed the discussion a couple of pages ago about Buffalo wireless routers.

They are pieces of shit. I have experience working with them for work. One guy says he has one at home flashed with DDWRT that works great, but the ones we have out in the field fail pretty regularly.

One must also remember that they were banned for sale in the US for a little over a year as part of a patent suit/injunction.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chenghiz on December 03, 2009, 06:48:22 PM
God, I hope this is a quick question.

I had explorer freeze up in my install of Windows Vista. I hard-rebooted and the computer got past the green-bar loading screen for windows, only to give me a black screen and a cursor. When I tried to repair the install with my CD, my install of Vista didn't show up in the box where it asks you which install to repair.

I decided to go ahead and install Windows 7. That went pretty well, but now I can't see my secondary HDD in My Computer. It's listed in the device manager as functioning properly, and the defrag utility can see it as well, but it has no drive letter. I suspect this is because while my primary HDD is hooked up by IDE, the secondary is SATA and for some reason windows doesn't have the proper drivers for it. Note that this computer is not currently on the internet, so windows can't look for drivers.

Am I on the money here? I won't have internet on this computer for a month or so, but if I can download drivers elsewhere and transfer them to the computer that would be grand.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 03, 2009, 07:02:01 PM
Can the Disk Manager see the drive?  If so, can you assign it a drive letter?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chenghiz on December 03, 2009, 07:14:30 PM
Can the Disk Manager see the drive?  If so, can you assign it a drive letter?
Um, that's a fantastic question. I'll look into that. For whatever reason, I always forget that the disk manager exists.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 03, 2009, 09:05:04 PM
Pre-Windows XP SP3 there were no generic SATA drivers on the install discs/images. I can't imagine Windows 7 is somehow missing those. You can check in the Device Manager to see if it sees your SATA controller(s).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 11, 2009, 07:45:41 AM
Protip: A TCP/IP packet which contains two bits which are are "flipped" and are also 1216 bytes apart will pass a CRC checksum.  Unlikely?  Sure, but transmitting a 10TB database where lots of bad packets crop up will push this from UNLIKELY into INEVITABLE.  This was specifically noted on a Nortel Passport 8600.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 11, 2009, 08:47:04 AM
Just out of curiosity what size frames are you using?  Jumbo?  Super Jumbo?  Just regular old 1518?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 11, 2009, 12:13:56 PM
I can tell you we use 1500 MTU on the client, since I'm the client.  Beyond that, the switches are impenetrable to me and the diagnosis (performed by someone else since I'm too fucking busy to do fun things) jives with a previous problem wherein packets were being mangled for some reason.  If memory serves, and it may not, we had some misaligned packet sizes causing "truncation" of the frame data between certain network appliances.  The idea that the network team is not aware of large-quantity resends is not surprising or interesting, but the ability for the CRC to fail is.  To me, anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 11, 2009, 12:48:54 PM
I just ask because the CRC algorithm changes depending on frame size, obviously the larger the packet the less robust the CRC check is with a 32 bit CRC.  The IEEE CRC standard was not chosen for accuracy, more for ease of implementation and speed, add to that even more emphasis on speedy, less resource intensive CRC checking for those jumbo and super jumbo (which are not IEEE standards btw) and I could easily anticipate more chance of false positives on a CRC check.  That said, even with a Jumbo Frame the CRC should be able to handle ~72Kb of data reliably (8*9k interestingly enough) from what I've read.

That you have enough double bit errors to practically guarantee 1 that passes the CRC check every 10TB of data (which is hefty but not really OMGWTFBBQ!), seems to me, to be pretty alarming.  The error rate is supposed specced to be 1x10^-12 for a well implemented 10GBASE-T Ethernet bus (that's the error rate due to electrical issues, not the rate at which you would expect a false positive CRC check which, I think, should be MUCH lower).  If you do have that many errors your network must be dog slow.

I don't really know all that much about it other than having spent the last few days reading the 802.3 spec and other assorted info and evaluating MAC & PHY IP cores for a BUS down select meeting.  If we decide to go with 1000BASE-T or 10G Ethernet (unlikely, it will probably be Spacewire) it would still be months until I had implemented anything and then months more before I was actually familiar enough with it in a lab to really help trouble-shoot or provide a reasonable chance at a solution.  Mostly, I was just curious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 11, 2009, 01:30:54 PM
Yeah, no problem at all... personally I'd like to get into what the (UNIX) guy did to determine this, but I don't have time for it.  I agree with you that there has to be a hell of a lot of errors somewhere.  The network isn't detectably slow, though we're using gigabit almost universally and I think the bottleneck is CPU or local IO.  It is almost assuredly contained in one particular route since restoring the same 10TB DB onto a machine on an entirely different (and newer) network produced zero corruption.  The target that is on the bad route has been corrupted on each of the past six or so restores, over a period of time slightly larger than one year.  The size is just big enough for us to see the corruption easily, it's not a size issue at all, like you said.  We might just be dodging it elsewhere with smaller DBs but I'm pretty sure it is isolated to a few clients on an older segment.

Interesting bit about the CRC standard.  I had no idea but it makes sense.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 18, 2009, 05:29:00 AM
Anyone ever open up a Razer Diamondback or similar?  My mousewheel has sudddenly become resistant to movement so I figure a quick de-gunking is in order, but turns out there are no screws on this thing.  I don't want to buy a new mouse just because my current one is dirty, but I also don't want to pry it open and end up with a crap mouse.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lesion on December 21, 2009, 06:35:34 PM
Haven't done it personally. About halfway down, this says the screw is under the rear foot: http://www.dansdata.com/diamondback.htm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 03, 2010, 03:30:05 PM
So I finally found a game that makes good use of my second monitor (World in Conflict, was on sale on Steam a couple of weeks ago - you can put the "mini map" on a second monitor - rock!), but my computer dies after playing it for a bit.

It basically goes into sleep mode (monitors turn off, go into sleep mode) with no response from the keyboard or mouse. The fans in the case are still running, everything else looks like it's ON but it won't respond. Music/sound stops. Keyboard still has numlock lit but won't change. iPod still getting power from the mobo.

Any ideas what might cause this?

I had thought it might be a mobo/memory issue when this happened to me a few months ago, but at the time I wasn't even playing games when it started randomly 'sleeping'. So I took the opportunity to buy a new mobo/cpu/memory, and now that I'm trying to play games again, it's back!

I'm leaning toward the graphics card (eVGA Geforce 8800 GT), which pisses me off.. the NVIDIA system monitor (which barely works on Win7) keeps reporting GPU temps going from 64*C to 192*C, fluctuating back and forth every few seconds even when just sitting on the desktop. So something (the software or the hardware) is flakey there.

Any second opinions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 03, 2010, 03:32:55 PM
My guess is either your CPU or GPU is overheating, probably the GPU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 03, 2010, 07:23:47 PM
Ya, the 8800GT is a pretty good card when used on a single monitor, but asking the card to do two monitor renderings at once is probably asking a bit too much. Also, the factory cooling for that series of cards sucked ass, for the most part.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 04, 2010, 05:39:48 AM
Any second opinions?

Blow all the dust out of your case and fans and run a temperature monitor, if you have two HDD's in adjacent bays move them at least 1 space apart.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 04, 2010, 10:13:25 AM
An OSX question:

If I remote VNC into an OSX session can I have the remote desktop be a different size than the current system desktop?

The current desktop is 1024x800 but the computer I am connecting in from has much more screen real-estate and I would like to make use of it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 04, 2010, 10:18:04 AM
Blew out my case, also blew out the gpu's fan/heatsink. Didn't seem to help any. Using HWMonitor my HDs are running coolish (34*C) and don't increase when playing a game.

I ran a Prime95 test with Core Temp up, and even at 85*C the i5 worked like a charm - no shutdown problems there.

I'm 80% positive it's my gfx card, as when I start the game I get FPS where I expect to see them (60+) with the settings I have. After about 5 mins the FPS drops to 30+ and then 5 more mins it'll croak. This happens in single or dual monitor mode - just faster in dual mode.

But hell, I bought a new PSU and gfx just in case.

Oddly, RivaTuner is the only app I could find that'd give me a good steady reading on the GPU temp. Even the Nvidia System Monitor software fluctuated all over the place (maybe because it's an ATI chipset mobo?)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 04, 2010, 11:52:36 AM
An OSX question:

If I remote VNC into an OSX session can I have the remote desktop be a different size than the current system desktop?

The current desktop is 1024x800 but the computer I am connecting in from has much more screen real-estate and I would like to make use of it.
Don't think so, though I haven't dug too far into remote desktop. I'm using an older version and get annoyed by it setting the window to the size of the login screen (10.3), have to close out the window and reopen it after logging in remotely to get the full desktop res without scrollbars. :|


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 04, 2010, 01:23:42 PM
For RealVNC when you start the server on the command line you pass it a value for remote desktops (i.e. vncserver --geometry 1280x1024).   Is there a command line argument to start the vncserver in OSX or is it only through the GUI?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 04, 2010, 01:42:18 PM
Dunno, I just use the gooey.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 04, 2010, 08:01:16 PM

I ran a Prime95 test with Core Temp up, and even at 85*C the i5 worked like a charm - no shutdown problems there.


Is it even safe to bring the i5 to those sorts of temps?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 04, 2010, 09:46:19 PM
I ran a Prime95 test with Core Temp up, and even at 85*C the i5 worked like a charm - no shutdown problems there.
Is it even safe to bring the i5 to those sorts of temps?
The limit for LGA 1156 chips is <100C.

85C is pretty high, though. I would be worried with anything above around 65C myself. My i7 doesn't even break 50C on Prime95 using this Noctua heat sink (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835608014&cm_re=noctua-_-35-608-014-_-Product) (with both fans installed).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 05, 2010, 01:29:39 PM
I ran a Prime95 test with Core Temp up, and even at 85*C the i5 worked like a charm - no shutdown problems there.
Is it even safe to bring the i5 to those sorts of temps?
The limit for LGA 1156 chips is <100C.

85C is pretty high, though. I would be worried with anything above around 65C myself. My i7 doesn't even break 50C on Prime95 using this Noctua heat sink (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835608014&cm_re=noctua-_-35-608-014-_-Product) (with both fans installed).

Actually, I do think 85*C is high, though not awful. Maybe my thermal paste is old or whatever, so I'll be checking that out too - it was pretty stable even at those temperatures for 10-15 minutes. (Though I've never seen it go over 50% usage on all four cores unless doing something like Prime95). Maybe next month I'll get a new heatsink, but for now I've spent enough cash on random computer parts (and games!).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 05, 2010, 05:06:08 PM
How old could that paste possibly be?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 05, 2010, 05:23:39 PM
Heh, no idea .. I got it with the CPU, but who knows how long it was on the shelf before I got it. I could have put too much on or not enough - hard to say, but I'll take the CPU off and see when I open it up this weekend.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 07, 2010, 05:27:23 AM
Can anyone enlighten me at all with regards to choosing a decent soundcard?

I'm running Win 7 64 and want something better than the onboard AC97 I've got now. It's going to output to a Sony HT-SF1300 home theatre system which as a wide range of possible input options - Optical, COAX, HDMI and standard red/white audio jack things. I have no idea what the best option for connection is nor what the difference between all those options is!

It's for gaming, music and video playback although gaming is the main focus (the PS3 is used mostly for music/video through the same audio system).

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 07, 2010, 07:51:50 AM
If you want onboard DD5.1, you're going to have to get an Auzentech. I had an older card and the drivers were shit. (edit: just looked at their site and looks like they dumped the dolby chip but added hdmi out and x-fi parts). You still want to go with Auzentech if you need bluray on the pc to keep the digital path, the creative x-fi runs analog through part of the chain - no latency and it works great, but it's enough to break HDCP bullshit.

I'm using an X-Fi with the extra memory through their DTS-610 which outputs optical to my receiver. It's also on sale for $25 right now, which is a good deal.

http://us.store.creative.com/Home-Theater-Connect-DTS610/M/B002651ZEM.htm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 07, 2010, 10:50:06 AM
I don't need BluRay on the PC, the PS3 handles that with aplomb.

I admit I don't really understand a lot of the rest of what you said..  :oh_i_see:  I need something else inbetween the soundcard and the theatre system? Huh? Why? Also the only Auzentech card I can find for sale in the UK (with a cursory search) is £152. That seems like a vast amount for a soundcard!

I'm confused :(


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 07, 2010, 11:59:51 AM
Creative X-Fi cards output surround sound to analog and need an intermediate step. Either setup (creative or auzentech) will cost you over a hundred bucks unless you get that deal on the DTS-610 at $25. Looking at PCI express X-Fi, that route would cost you around $75 ($50 X-Fi + DTS-610).

(http://images.americas.creative.com/images/products/inline/pc_audio.gif)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 07, 2010, 01:18:17 PM
You still want to go with Auzentech if you need bluray on the pc to keep the digital path, the creative x-fi runs analog through part of the chain - no latency and it works great, but it's enough to break HDCP bullshit.

Are you saying that you can't use creative x-fi if you want to run bluray through a reciever? Cuz I watch bluray on my PC and use a creative x-fi card, but I don't have a reciever, just go straight to speakers from the card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 07, 2010, 01:55:39 PM
Stereo downsampled, unless you're running a digital out to the speakers? There may be a way to pass surround that's already encoded, but for encoding on the fly, you need the stupid DTS-610.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 07, 2010, 05:59:57 PM
Oh, its not surroundsound, its just two speakers and a woofer. Standard PC sound system. I think I get you now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 07, 2010, 11:22:20 PM
OK gotcha. So how about something like this:
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=SC-001-AS&groupid=701&catid=11&subcat=

Says "Real-time DDL and DTS Connect encoders for amazing gaming and surround sounds over your Home Theater System". They seem to make a lot of noise about still giving EAX/surround with VIsta. Am I understand that right?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 08, 2010, 06:43:19 AM
I dunno, that whole bit confuses the heck out of me. Not sure where everything stands with EAX and OpenAL and ALchemy, I skipped Vista and thus far things seem to be working on 7 but I'm mostly playing newer games. If anyone has the skinny on the whole situation as it pertains to Win7, a primer would be welcome :)

Hardware encoding is really nice, though. It lacks optical out, but does have coax SPDIF, so that should preserve the HDCP chain (I guess if the soundcard has the magical blessing, who the fuck knows with content nazis).

I guess you could always give it a whirl and return it if you don't like it. I had to do that twice trying to get my setup running through my receiver after my soundstorm chip died.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 08, 2010, 09:19:11 AM
That sounds like a good plan. That retailer are pretty good about that kind of thing - I'm in the process of RMA'ing a Logitech wireless keyboard and mouse set with them right now because the bluetooth only worked and <1m  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 08, 2010, 10:03:50 AM
I've been much happier with RF, but even that sucks the bed for consistent connection. I end up with the receiver on the coffee table for the 5% of the time it wants to be shabby with the connection distance. Yet my 360 controller will work great from the kitchen.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 08, 2010, 11:09:18 AM
I picked up the Xonar D2X last week. The win7 drivers WORK! No flaky left rear speaker, optical and coax work, and DD outputs DD, not murky upmixed stereo. And my microphone stays as a microphone, not reverting every few days to line-in or 'disabled' I did get a LotRO crash when running with eax checked, but it did that with the xfi too. It was odd to have to hook power into a sound card, but whatever.

The Xfi titanium will not be missed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 08, 2010, 11:28:23 AM
Wait wait, the Xonar's Win7 drivers aren't crap?

Oh noes. Might have to get. How is everything else with it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 08, 2010, 11:38:51 AM
Fine, so far.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on January 11, 2010, 08:50:36 AM
Yeah, so that question again. My GPU fried, and I'm looking for the next one.

I had a 512 MB 4870. I was pretty happy with it, but it was incredibly loud - felt like I was in an airplane hanger.

What are peoples' recommendations for a $200ish graphics card that, well, doesn't sound like you're in an airplane hanger?

Thanks in advance...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 11, 2010, 09:57:36 AM
That 4870 is indeed like a hairdryer, especially when attempting to run Sims 3.  I'm interesting in posing the same question but with a leaning toward my Old Pal Nvidia.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 11, 2010, 10:44:16 AM
Best bet is probably visiting http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=19&sid=d6e2e597f9f0d00ca48eb33fd98166b8 forums for video cards. Seems they are talking about http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102868 this card a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 11, 2010, 11:56:22 AM
I bought this guy, just last week based on reviews and Toms Hardware's best buys for Dec 09.

SAPPHIRE Vapor-X 100283VXL Radeon HD 5770 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102868) - $175

Much quieter than my (failing) EVGA Nvidia card.

Edit: haha, see Engels' post.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 11, 2010, 12:29:59 PM
ONETWENTYEIGHTBIT
 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 11, 2010, 12:30:49 PM
:oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 11, 2010, 01:10:53 PM
 :raspberry:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 11, 2010, 07:32:33 PM
Dude that's twice as good as 64 bit.  You are jealous.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on January 12, 2010, 09:15:31 PM
So reviews are saying it's similar performance to the 4870, but quiet. We may have a winner.

Viin, how are you finding performance?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 13, 2010, 07:27:48 AM
Briefly returning to the soundcard issue from ealier, I did end up getting the Asus Xonar D2X.

Got it installed and after some tweaking got it working mostly OK. Great sound from it and very good surround (in Win 7 64) in games, although I have had to play with the levels of my 5.1 speakers a bit to get it sounding just right.

One small problem though, whenever I start a new sound source I get a very short but quite loud burst of what sounds like white noise, a kind of pop or brief scratch or single crackle. Once something is initialised and making sound it's fine, no repeat of it, but starting up or stopping anything that outputs sound gets the nasty noise.

Anyone got any ideas what could cause that, if it's serious and if so how I can make it stop?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 13, 2010, 07:47:29 AM
That shit is exactly why I dropped the auzentech. In several games it would suddenly decide to blast me with some white noise, about a second long and full volume. Seemed to happen totally at random, totally unacceptable. I hope you can find a fix for it, I wasn't able to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 13, 2010, 12:00:20 PM
It's not doing it on my system (win7 x64), perhaps something else is stepping on it? Old drivers all removed and such? On-board sound disabled, etc



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 13, 2010, 05:48:49 PM
So reviews are saying it's similar performance to the 4870, but quiet. We may have a winner.

Viin, how are you finding performance?

Working well, running in World in Conflict with 8x AA and High settings without a stutter at 1680x1050. Probably could do Very High with small stutters during crazy times, but saw no need. Haven't run a 3d Mark or anything yet though.

i can do that if you wanna see it.

Edit: in conflict, not of conflict


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Baldrake on January 13, 2010, 06:00:24 PM
Teh awesome. Thanks Viin. No need to do a 3dmark - there's loads of benchmarks all over the web.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 13, 2010, 11:31:41 PM
It's not doing it on my system (win7 x64), perhaps something else is stepping on it? Old drivers all removed and such? On-board sound disabled, etc

Yeah to both. I suspect it's the home theatre system at fault since it used to do it on the PS3 with some games, notable Fallout3. I'll have a play with moar settings, of which there are a lot of a lot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 14, 2010, 12:10:57 PM
Yeah, I messed about trying optical, coax, and regular speaker out, and couldn't reproduce it. Good luck tracking it down.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 21, 2010, 08:42:18 AM
Anyone else really annoyed at the 'new' Windows 7 & Vista Advanced Firewall functionality, or lack thereof? Services like Remote Desktop and File and Printer Sharing are limted to local subnet range by default, it seems. This would be fine if it were easily editable, but whereas in XP its simply a matter of a 3 button choice 3 clicks away, in Windows 7 you have to sort through 3 different firewall profiles (domain, private & public), select each and every element of a particular service and then tab to one of 6 options to open the local subnet.

Although on the one hand I appreciate the probabe intent of giving the IT person greater control and detail over firewall configuration, couldn't they have make it just a wee tad simpler to edit? Its as if they think that the network environment they use in some ghastly Redmond office park is the way it works in the entire rest of the civilized world. And I'm only 30 miles away.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 21, 2010, 08:49:45 AM
I have not had to do this and therefore am not annoyed, but I was wondering if there was some script or just a command-set you could run to do this without all the drilldown?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 21, 2010, 09:41:03 AM
Can't you edit the settings for 'Remote Desktop' and change it for all 3 at once? (I haven't looked at this in awhile).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 21, 2010, 08:33:37 PM
Not as far as I know, Viin. You can't select the whole batch and right-click properties, and the limitation to a specific scope isn't allowed through the 'vanilla' Windows Firewall interface. You have to to to Control Panel> Administrative Tools> Windows with Advanced Pain In the Neck to edit scope and other restrictions, and there it seems to be a port by port breakdown. So, for example, the 6 ports or so assigned to File and Printer Sharing have to each be individually fiddled with if you want to set it for, say, 3 subnets rather than just Local Subnet (the default).

Yegolev, there are pretty nice commandline options using the netsh tool. It has a very very deep configuration tree, and that's great for, say, automated batch settings to multiple computers at once, but its not so practical if you just need to quickly modify something on a single machine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 21, 2010, 10:17:49 PM
I make no apologies for my love of the command-line. :oh_i_see:  However I agree that it depends on how much typing is involved and whether it is worth your time to write something which would take a few args and do what you want quickly.  Settings per port?  Jeez.  You poor bastard. :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2010, 10:35:25 AM
So, my home machine keeps restarting during power up.  When I go to turn it on there are no error beeps, the lights on the front are dead but the fans spin up then powere cuts out and 10 seconds later the fans spin up, basically stuck in an endless power up/reset loop. 

Power supply (6 year old pcpower&cooling) or mothereboard (1 year old asus p5q se plus)?

I have already reseated the power & vid card then blown everything out.

Headed to fry's I guess.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 24, 2010, 10:40:22 AM
Quote
the lights on the front are dead

Is this the only indicator that something's wrong? Other than the reboot, of course.

If so, do you have another machine to test the PSU on? Or another PSU to test the motherboard on?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2010, 11:06:21 AM
Quote
the lights on the front are dead

Is this the only indicator that something's wrong? Other than the reboot, of course.

If so, do you have another machine to test the PSU on? Or another PSU to test the motherboard on?
No spare parts, I figured I would just buy a psu and if that isn't it then return it.  Is there a decent modular psu (over 500 watts) for under $100 that isn't too loud?

Edit: how about coolmax? Looking at a 700 Watt 4 rail modular for $65.

Edit2: or an antec 650 truepower for $80.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 24, 2010, 11:35:27 AM
I've had issues with a few Antec supplies in the last couple years. I'm using a Corsair (non-modular) in my machine, and have been using Thermaltake modulars (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817153115) and normal (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817153036) in machines for other people.

Both are a bit over $100, and more voltage than you specified, but are the two I've got experience with. No problems so far, but I've only built about a dozen machines with them over two years, so dunno the long-term yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2010, 11:43:52 AM
I've had issues with a few Antec supplies in the last couple years. I'm using a Corsair (non-modular) in my machine, and have been using Thermaltake modulars (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817153115) and normal (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817153036) in machines for other people.

Both are a bit over $100, and more voltage than you specified, but are the two I've got experience with. No problems so far, but I've only built about a dozen machines with them over two years, so dunno the long-term yet.

Went with the antec, I've heard about the reliability issues before but they seem to have their share of fanbois.  I was pretty sold on the PC power & cooling but a $200 psu should last more than 6 years.  Who knows it may still be good, but if it ends up being my mobo not sure I would trust the psu anymore.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 24, 2010, 11:50:02 AM
I pretty much consider 5 years of service to be a good run when it comes to computer things. If they last longer, great, but I don't rely on anything that old.

And I used to use antec psus, just got 2 doas (both truepower), and several that stopped working after a few months. None of the 3 NeoPower units lasted a full year. So I've stopped using Antec entirely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2010, 01:06:04 PM
Well, it doesn't appear to be the psu, same thing is happening with the antec.  I'm going to pull everything (including CPU) then reseat it all.  If that doesn't work I guess I'll be looking for a new mobo, anyone have suggestions for a good core2 duo board with onboard sound?

Or maybe I should call Asus the mobo is. Only 13 months old.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2010, 05:27:43 PM
Looks like it was the mobo. I dropped a new gigabyte board in and it now boots fine.  I think I'll keep the new psu as well since it is significantly quieter than my other one.  Now I suppose I'll reinstall w7 as it really didn't like what just happened.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 24, 2010, 05:46:49 PM
Can you define 'really didn't like what just happened'? If you could even boot to the OS when you replaced the mobo, that's probably a good thing, since all  you should have to do is install the native mobo drivers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2010, 07:16:16 PM
It boots to recover/repair tool.  Doesn't let me into safe mode & repair fails.  Pretty sure Microsoft recommends a reinstall when switching mobos, even if repair appears so work (which it didn't). It did flash up a system restore option which I cancelled out of.  I may try restoring to the earliest point and going from there. This might work since I am still using the same chipset.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 24, 2010, 09:57:48 PM
I doubt the system restore will do much. Chances are the OS is seeing new hardware and balking. This may be a driver issue, or more likely, a licensing issue. Go with the full reinstall if its not too big a deal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 25, 2010, 08:15:45 AM
When switching motherboards I always recommend a full reinstall for stability reasons.  (I haven't attempted many transfers like this, but none have worked since Win2k.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 27, 2010, 01:01:29 PM
Yeah I ended up doing a full reinstall, good news is my PC is ultra quiet now and my new motherboard is always pushing power to the usb ports so I can go back to using my mamba wirelessly w/o worrying about charging while the pc is off.  Bad news is I dumped $240 on parts and forgot to import my pst files from windows.old before deleting it so I lost about 2 months worth of email.  The reinstall also let me ditch some registry gems left behind by the Nero Trial Version that I really really regret trying.

Also, found out FF 3.6 is crap and rolled back to 3.5.7, so other than virtual box and some steam games I am more or less back to normal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 27, 2010, 10:49:31 PM
How's the new FF crap? Just curious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 28, 2010, 03:26:40 PM
How's the new FF crap? Just curious.
Mucho crashes.  Was consistently crashing on Reddit and a few other of my frequently visited sites.

Edit - most likely a FF + addons quirk, I had firebug, web dev toolbar, tab mix plus and noscript loaded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 28, 2010, 07:57:51 PM
It seems to have lost some stability recently, in my opinion.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 28, 2010, 08:19:00 PM
Anyone run into a problem where their extra mouse buttons stop working after the monitor goes into sleep mode? When I wake the monitor back up my left/right buttons work fine by my scroll wheel and back button don't ... seems to take a reboot to get back, annoying!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 28, 2010, 08:51:45 PM
I neither sleep my monitor nor press my extra mouse buttons.

:oh_i_see:

Although I might suspect sleepy USB ports... but then why would the buttons work?  Could be the driver doesn't cooperate with sleepy USB?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 28, 2010, 09:06:11 PM
Anyone run into a problem where their extra mouse buttons stop working after the monitor goes into sleep mode? When I wake the monitor back up my left/right buttons work fine by my scroll wheel and back button don't ... seems to take a reboot to get back, annoying!
That's just way too little information to help diagnose your prolblem. Don't know your OS, what kind of mouse you have, where it's plugged into, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 29, 2010, 08:55:56 AM
Oops I meant to add a line that says:

Windows 7 running a Microsoft Bluetooth mouse (with Intellimouse) and connects via a USB dongle.

Oddly, the dongle *is* plugged into the monitor, but if that was causing the problem I would expect it to not work at all .. not just the back button and scroll wheel.

I'll move it to the computer proper and see if that helps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 29, 2010, 09:10:48 AM
I've seen this problem with some KVM switches where the special mouse USB port doesn't pass through all the non-standard mouse functionality (extra buttons, special scroll functions, etc.). This happens because that port is sending special "mouse emulation" signals so the computers don't freak out and think a mouse is being unplugged and plugged everytime you switch between them but the emulation mode doesn't support all the non-standard mouse functions your mouse might have.

It's possible when the monitor goes to sleep the monitor USB ports go into a different state so the dongle gets confused and reverts back to some sort of "compatibility" mode akin to what the above KVM mouse USB port is doing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 29, 2010, 04:22:15 PM
Heh, that was some quality information-withholding.  I salute you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 01, 2010, 07:50:06 AM
Oops I meant to add a line that says:

Windows 7 running a Microsoft Bluetooth mouse (with Intellimouse) and connects via a USB dongle.

Oddly, the dongle *is* plugged into the monitor, but if that was causing the problem I would expect it to not work at all .. not just the back button and scroll wheel.

I'll move it to the computer proper and see if that helps.

Moved it to the computer, no joy - same issue. If I unplug the usb dongle and plug it into a new USB slot, it'll reinitialize the dongle and give me all my buttons back.

Must be a Win7 driver issue, didn't have this problem with Vista. Sooo I guess I'll wait for MS to give me a new driver. Sigh.

Heh, that was some quality information-withholding.  I salute you.

I've spent many years perfecting the art. Do not try this at home!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on February 01, 2010, 07:51:55 AM
So over the weekend my system screwed itself, startup got me an 'NTLDR is missing' message. Took a few starts but eventually a total restore from the last backup got it working (the replace or whichever one, just system restore didn't work). Annoying since it had been almost a week since my last weekly backup but not too destructive. However since then my backups haven't worked. I've got 3 hard drivess and 4 partitions (one OS and one for programs) and it was backing up to my 1TB drive. However the backup now fails every time it tries and if I go to select settings I only get the option of the program partition or my 500gb hard drive. The big one is still working and I can still save files to it and access them but it seems the OS has decided this no longer works for backups. I'm running W7 and aside from the NTLDR thing and system backups no changes to it.

The NTLDR error was slightly weird since it worked fine on Friday night and I didn't really do anything with aside from web browsing, went to boot it on and Saturday and got the error message.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 01, 2010, 09:25:20 AM
Nowhereman, I have heard that the Windows 7 backup utility is very very buggy and doesn't like some of the south bridge (storage controllers) chipset drivers sometimes.

I spent most of yesterday fighting with Windows 7 too. The idea was to make a disk clone of my Win 7 RC so that I can try the 'upgrade' method of installing a retail copy without having to do a clean install without compromising my existing install of RC.

Oh boy.

First, Acronis 2009 was not happy with my new 1TB WD Caviar Black. No sure why. I think its actually not happy with the Window 7 partitioning and can't collect the data to write to the new drive. I suspect is that 'administrative' partition that Win 7 places before the OS has some level of encryption that a 1 year old Acronis can't handle.

Next I tried a straight up partition to partition with Norton Ghost. It could see both the OS and the admin partition, so I cloned those in order. I should have probably done a flat out disk-to-disk.

Tecnically speaking, it worked. However, when I booted the original OS with the new drive in there, it labled the new OS partition on the new drive D. Then when I booted to the new drive with the old drive entirely disconnected, Win 7 declared my copy of Windows 7 'non genuine' and wouldn't let me do jack in the system. The OS partition remained named Drive D:. Not sure if the symptoms are related.

Plan B is to use the aformentioned Window 7 backup utility and 'restore my image' to the new Caviar drive, then try the Win 7 retail upgrade on that, if I can boot to the danged thing without getting locked out.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on February 04, 2010, 04:30:39 PM
Hay guise. I've noticed my ATI Saphire 3870 is kinda loud after our last spat of upgrades. I dunno if the new case just means I hear the fan better or what. Anyway, it starts out quiet and then the fans kick in. I'm wondering if throwing a case fan into the mix might help keep the whole thing cooler, or if I'm just going to be adding more noise.

The stock case has no fans at all. Just the stuff that comes with the PS, CPU and video card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 04, 2010, 04:46:14 PM
Does the video card fan get louder only when playings games or does it do that as well just doing Windows desktop-type stuff?

What size is your rear exhaust fan mount? If it's larger > 80mm (e.g. 92mm or 120mm) and you get a low RPM fan it's unlikely you'll hear it and it can only help things. If it's only 80mm you'll need to be more choosy in terms of what fan to install there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on February 04, 2010, 05:56:42 PM
Does the video card fan get louder only when playings games or does it do that as well just doing Windows desktop-type stuff?

What size is your rear exhaust fan mount? If it's larger > 80mm (e.g. 92mm or 120mm) and you get a low RPM fan it's unlikely you'll hear it and it can only help things. If it's only 80mm you'll need to be more choosy in terms of what fan to install there.


Only when playing 3-D games. Otherwise it doesn't even kick in, that I can notice, when doing desktop stuff.

80mm on the back fan mount. I was thinking about getting a fan for the front mount, to draw cool air in.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Dion on February 06, 2010, 05:47:41 AM
I'm just curious what you guys think of the i3 530, I'm considering it for my next gaming PC as I'm on a budget.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 06, 2010, 09:01:07 AM
I'm just curious what you guys think of the i3 530, I'm considering it for my next gaming PC as I'm on a budget.
If you don't need quad-core (HT doesn't count) it's a good budget CPU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 06, 2010, 10:37:00 AM
Has anyone here purchased a software download from NewEgg? I just did, and for the life of me I can't find where to download it. I got a credit card charge confirmation email, the order shows up on my account, but nothing about how to -get- the danged thing downloaded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 06, 2010, 11:15:09 AM
Has anyone here purchased a software download from NewEgg? I just did, and for the life of me I can't find where to download it. I got a credit card charge confirmation email, the order shows up on my account, but nothing about how to -get- the danged thing downloaded.

You have to wait for the CD which has the download app and the key on it.

Just kidding.

Quote
How do I download software that I have purchased?

Begin the download by clicking on the link provided in your Order Confirmation email. Once you have selected the link, choose to 'Save Target As' or 'Save Link As.' Once the download starts, you will see a box pop up with a status bar, and a percentage that will climb to 100%.

After the download has completed, you will need to go to the folder or point in which you saved the file, and double click on the new icon to start the installation. Please contact Customer Support if you require any assistance.

You may download the file anywhere you like, just make sure to remember where you saved it, along with the name of the file. If you download the software to your Desktop, it will be easier to locate and to install the product once you have finished the download.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 06, 2010, 11:37:56 AM
Thanks Viin. It just took them over an hour to send me the email confirmation. All's good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ratman_tf on February 06, 2010, 12:59:29 PM
Well, I got off my butt and ordered some ties to tame the cables and a set of 28db case fans for each computer. Couldn't hurt!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 08, 2010, 04:23:15 AM
So, my Radeon X1900 GT idles at 78* C and looks fairly clean, games black screen and stop responding, and occasionally a reset nets a STOP PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA error.  This is a sign I need to buy a new card, right Trippy?

EDIT: Maybe not, even at 110* C it doesn't artifact according to ATi Tray Tools.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 08, 2010, 07:04:57 AM
A page faults is normally associated with bad memory. Could be video memory, could be regular. Burn an ISO of Memtest86 (http://www.memtest86.com/download.html) and boot to that, let that run for a while, see if you get errors. Memory problems can go undetected till you load a memory intensive program that takes all your memory's address spaces up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on February 08, 2010, 09:42:14 AM
78/110 seems awfully hot for that card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 08, 2010, 10:41:09 AM
So, my Radeon X1900 GT idles at 78* C and looks fairly clean, games black screen and stop responding, and occasionally a reset nets a STOP PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA error.  This is a sign I need to buy a new card, right Trippy?

EDIT: Maybe not, even at 110* C it doesn't artifact according to ATi Tray Tools.
Those temps look to be at least 10C too high. That idle temp looks especially odd.

What are your CPU temps like?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 08, 2010, 11:16:51 AM
My 8800GTX pushed mid-90C under load and kept faulting, turned out it was a production fault with the memory heat spreaders on evga's initial run of 8800s. Third card had a decent heat sink, but it was also the regular superclock version, not the one with the massive full-body armor sheath.

Anyway, if you have heat sinks on the vram, might want to check that. If not, might need it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 08, 2010, 03:45:04 PM
What are your CPU temps like?

52* C idle, it's a P4 so it will run hot.  I did say my computer was ancient, right?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 08, 2010, 06:08:28 PM
What are your CPU temps like?

52* C idle, it's a P4 so it will run hot.  I did say my computer was ancient, right?
Can you reliably get a black screen in a game? If so what happens if you open up the side of your case and then try to reproduce the black screen?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 08, 2010, 08:49:20 PM
I think I tracked the black screen to Blizzard's recent ATi DirectX fix, it appears to have cut it out with that disabled, I already had opened my case when the problem first started cropping up, though I've put some airflow through the case with a fan and it seems to drop the card temperature down a fair bit, that's probably just my room being hot as the devil's asscrack and poorly ventilated.  Still no fucking clue what caused the BSoD on hard reset.

When you get a STOP error, the first hex value is the error identifier and the ones in brackets show where the bad shit occurred, right?  Because if so the bracketed addresses direct me to the PCI Bus, but there is no corresponding device also with those memory locations.

Really, don't kill yourself over this, it may be the last straw in me deciding to move to an i3/i5 processor.  I just like to tinker far too much for my own good to let a chance to experiment slide.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: caladein on February 09, 2010, 05:12:54 AM
I picked up this switch (http://trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=355_TE100-S5&cat=114) to add some more ports down at another part of the house.

From what I understand of switches and Auto-MDIX: I can just run straight cables from my router and other devices into it and it should all "work".  Right?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 09, 2010, 02:43:33 PM
I picked up this switch (http://trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=355_TE100-S5&cat=114) to add some more ports down at another part of the house.

From what I understand of switches and Auto-MDIX: I can just run straight cables from my router and other devices into it and it should all "work".  Right?

Well if it doesn't you could just clip the end of the cable and manually unflip it as you put a new end on it, but yes it should work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 09, 2010, 05:16:41 PM
I picked up this switch (http://trendnet.com/products/proddetail.asp?prod=355_TE100-S5&cat=114) to add some more ports down at another part of the house.

From what I understand of switches and Auto-MDIX: I can just run straight cables from my router and other devices into it and it should all "work".  Right?

Yes. Auto-MDIX should allow any device to connect with either a straight or crossover.

Few if any devices used for home and small office networking these days require a crossover. Even most enterprise switches have auto-MDIX for switch to switch connections.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Fraeg on February 10, 2010, 07:24:39 PM
Power Supply/Booting question

windows xp pro
amd 64 2.2 duo
uhmm not at home forget power supply not generic but not  :drill:

recently when I shutdown my computer a error message flickers on the screen just before it shuts off.  It is there for just fractions of a second, too fast for me to actually read it.   The result is when I go to turn on my computer by simply pressing the *on* button nothing happens.   I have to turn the power supply off and unplug, replug and turn power supply back on.  Generally this works the first time.  Sometimes I basically have to flip the power supply on and off while hitting the start button.

If not for the error message I would assume that it is a bad power supply... but not sure. 

Penny for your thoughts?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 10, 2010, 07:52:51 PM
If you turn on the machine, wait for Winodows to finish booting, and then immediately shutdown, do you get the message/have turning it back on?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Fraeg on February 11, 2010, 08:27:17 AM
hmm if i do a restart it restarts fine

if I boot it up and then shut it down before windows loads I get the problem with having to turn power on and off (had to do that several times just to boot it this morning)

will try what you mention next.

*edit*

If you turn on the machine, wait for Winodows to finish booting, and then immediately shutdown, do you get the message/have turning it back on?


I have done this twice each time it flashes the error message too fast for me to read and then, although I clicked shutdown, it restarts  :oh_i_see:

*edit 2* make that three times, after posting the first edit I shutdown and it behaves as if I hit restart


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 11, 2010, 10:36:37 AM
If you restart the machine and then power off manually (e.g. holding in the power button) when Windows finishes shutting down (i.e. when your screen goes blank and the power on startup screen starts to appear), can you power the machine back on without doing the power supply dance?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Fraeg on February 11, 2010, 09:02:34 PM
If you restart the machine and then power off manually (e.g. holding in the power button) when Windows finishes shutting down (i.e. when your screen goes blank and the power on startup screen starts to appear), can you power the machine back on without doing the power supply dance?


it still reboots, tried it several times.  Shutdown, manual (hold power button) whatever, it shuts down for a few seconds then boots up again.  Currently short of pulling the plug I am unable to turn off my PC, which is an interesting twist from being unable to turn it on  :heartbreak:

I am wondering if I simply have a wiring/connection issue with the Antec tower itself?  Leave money under my pillow for the PC Fairy?


*edit 2/16/10*  It was the power supply, which is the first one I have ever had fail on me.  I always thought when they failed it was *snap* gone/toast, and you hope it didn't fry stuff.  In conjunction with the power supply Samsung's "magictune" program was causing the shutdown issues. 

Thanks all for the feedback.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 12, 2010, 10:14:11 PM
Did you look to see if anything is in the event log?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 12, 2010, 10:21:34 PM
If you restart the machine and then power off manually (e.g. holding in the power button) when Windows finishes shutting down (i.e. when your screen goes blank and the power on startup screen starts to appear), can you power the machine back on without doing the power supply dance?
it still reboots, tried it several times.  Shutdown, manual (hold power button) whatever, it shuts down for a few seconds then boots up again.  Currently short of pulling the plug I am unable to turn off my PC, which is an interesting twist from being unable to turn it on  :heartbreak:

I am wondering if I simply have a wiring/connection issue with the Antec tower itself?  Leave money under my pillow for the PC Fairy?
Did your machine somehow get set to reboot on a BSoD?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 14, 2010, 12:05:55 PM
Any recommendations for video conferencing software that allows side by side video and recording of said video?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 14, 2010, 09:02:01 PM
What's side-by-side video? Is that what you call showing a video and a slideshow at the same time? Or two different screens at once?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 15, 2010, 08:00:30 AM
What's side-by-side video? Is that what you call showing a video and a slideshow at the same time? Or two different screens at once?

Not sure if I can describe it...

Rather than the person's videofeed I'm viewing being the large video, and mine being the smaller one inside or or somewhere off to the side, I'd rather have our two video feeds side by side and equal size.  And I'd like to be able to record the video as well.

Does that make sense?

Here's a crappy paint drawing

(http://i768.photobucket.com/albums/xx322/GHM1125/VIDEO.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 15, 2010, 08:25:35 AM
I don't think you'll find an all-in-one, but there are a few options:

http://www.ecamm.com/mac/callrecorder/ (Mac-based Skype video chat recorder, does side-by-side)
http://www.ivisit.com/products_presenter (might be able to do side-by-side, not sure)
http://www.camfrog.com/ (might be able to do side-by-side video)

You'd need to use a recorder with the last two, and Skype with the first.

http://www.oovoo.com/HowToooVooItem.aspx?pname=HowToooVooVideoCalling (allows 1-on-1 video and 1minute recording for free, paid option too)


Blog about this here:
http://www.djchuang.com/2009/how-to-stream-and-record-video-chat-interview/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 15, 2010, 08:46:59 AM
Good stuff, man.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 15, 2010, 10:13:39 AM
Crossfire question.  Accepting the inevitability of using ATi graphics cards, I noticed that I can put three cards into a Crossfire setup on a ASUS P6T Deluxe.  Having not researched SLI or Crossfire much, seems I can get two cards on x16/x16 or three cards on x16/x8/x8.  Pros/cons?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 15, 2010, 11:31:56 AM
I'm no expert, but I think it depends on what you hope to use all this for. One monitor or three?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 15, 2010, 12:28:53 PM
One monitor.  The idea of trying to have The Sims 3 run on multiple monitors causes me to shake a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 15, 2010, 02:27:41 PM
What size? Because I think that you could probably just get a single 5870, even for a fairly large monitor (1920x1200), and it'll handle just about anything you can throw at it. Or are you trying to future proof?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 15, 2010, 05:54:25 PM
Hmmm, my Windows 7 Beta just had a pop-up telling me to back shit up and get a retail version...I thought it was good for a year after release?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 15, 2010, 05:56:43 PM
Hmmm, my Windows 7 Beta just had a pop-up telling me to back shit up and get a retail version...I thought it was good for a year after release?
Technically it doesn't expire until June but starting March 1 it's going to shut down on you every 2 hours. Just because.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Fraeg on February 16, 2010, 01:19:02 PM
are you shitting us? it will really shutdown every two hours? What a great way to get return beta testers next go around  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 16, 2010, 01:25:32 PM
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Microsoft-Windows-OS-Release-Candidate,9564.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 16, 2010, 01:31:22 PM
are you shitting us? it will really shutdown every two hours? What a great way to get return beta testers next go around  :why_so_serious:

That doesn't seem *that* catastrophic. After all, the program has been released for retail (quite awhile ago I might add). How long do you expect a beta version to run? Forever? Then why would anyone ever buy it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 16, 2010, 06:47:37 PM
So I guess Win7 Ultimate OEM would be the equivalent release version?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 16, 2010, 07:32:02 PM
What size? Because I think that you could probably just get a single 5870, even for a fairly large monitor (1920x1200), and it'll handle just about anything you can throw at it. Or are you trying to future proof?

You'd think that, but I would have thought a HD 4870 would have done the same at 1680x1050 or less.  Now I am going to attempt to compensate for bad programming by putting a shit-ton of video cards in a computer.

Here's what I don't know: do I lose anything with a non-primary video card in a x8 slot?  How much data does it pump through the PCIE slot compared to across the Crossfire cable?  Might there be a bottleneck if I don't go x16?  Because I am probably about to put three 5850s in my wife's PC.  Yeah, I'm at least not going to do this with 5970s. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 16, 2010, 07:49:21 PM
What size? Because I think that you could probably just get a single 5870, even for a fairly large monitor (1920x1200), and it'll handle just about anything you can throw at it. Or are you trying to future proof?

You'd think that, but I would have thought a HD 4870 would have done the same at 1680x1050 or less.  Now I am going to attempt to compensate for bad programming by putting a shit-ton of video cards in a computer.

Here's what I don't know: do I lose anything with a non-primary video card in a x8 slot?  How much data does it pump through the PCIE slot compared to across the Crossfire cable?  Might there be a bottleneck if I don't go x16?  Because I am probably about to put three 5850s in my wife's PC.  Yeah, I'm at least not going to do this with 5970s. :oh_i_see:
Yes there's potentially a bottleneck at x8. Does it actually matter in practice? Hard to say.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on February 16, 2010, 07:51:32 PM
Isn't your wife just playing the sims? What the fuck does she need more than an 8800GT for?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 16, 2010, 08:28:10 PM
Isn't your wife just playing the sims? What the fuck does she need more than an 8800GT for?

Sounds like Yegolev is trying to brute force himself out of a fucked up situation or something.  He needs to just bite the bullet and pop in a spare test drive and try a fresh install of w7 on a newly formatted drive, install sims 3 as the 1st app and see if it truly has any of these phantom issues that apparently can only be addressed by triple SLI video cards and bandwidth in excess of of an x8 slot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 17, 2010, 08:23:57 AM
Isn't your wife just playing the sims? What the fuck does she need more than an 8800GT for?

Please see the Windows Performance Tuning thread.  Also: idk :uhrr: ? rofl  I think that it is an overabundance of textures, myself, coupled with shitty programming since EA knows that The Sims: Maggoty Turd would sell in the millions.  The advice you get on Sims forums almost always involves turning down video options, against which I rail.  So, it doesn't matter that her machines makes LoTRO look better than mine or that Dawn of Discovery runs like butter down the back of a whore if she can't play the game that this machine was ostensibly built to run.

Sounds like Yegolev is trying to brute force himself out of a fucked up situation or something.  He needs to just bite the bullet and pop in a spare test drive and try a fresh install of w7 on a newly formatted drive, install sims 3 as the 1st app and see if it truly has any of these phantom issues that apparently can only be addressed by triple SLI video cards and bandwidth in excess of of an x8 slot.

Correct.  Sensible approaches fail in the face of crazy women.  Although I think I can install TS3 on my own machine and see how that goes.  My rig is of lesser power and may shed some light... or not.  I wish I had time to do this the proper way but I have been working a lot lately.

Anyway, why should I NOT put three video cards in it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 17, 2010, 08:41:27 AM
See if it runs better on your less powerful machine, then give it to her, fer cryin' out loud :P You take the more powerful one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on February 17, 2010, 09:00:09 AM
Interesting tidbit about Sims 3:

If you are using custom content not supplied directly by EA, be careful about what ends up inside your \mods\packages folder. It turns out that the extension used for Sims 3 mods is the exact same as the extension for Sims 2 mods. If you inadvertantly put a Sims 2 mod in the Sims 3 mod directory, you will get some very interesting behaviour. The game will attempt to open the Sims 2 mod over and over and over again. A check with Process Monitor showed the Sims3 app attempting to open the same mod file over 100,000 times in about a two minute data capture.

Needless to say, this had a detrimental effect on game performance.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 17, 2010, 09:25:06 AM
Another interesting thing about TS3 is how it manages to find things on its own, so that is something to consider.  There's a lot more opacity in TS3 than in TS2, from what I have found so far, and I spent a while trying to understand where things are kept and how it found things I thought it should not know about.  Also the net connectivity is another variable.  I don't believe this TS2 content nugget is relevant unless one of the custom content items is really a TS2 one and she thought it was a TS3 item when she downloaded it.

See if it runs better on your less powerful machine, then give it to her, fer cryin' out loud :P You take the more powerful one.

Logistically frightening but strategically appealing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 17, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
I mentioned Bunk's idea to my wife and she moved the contents of the mods folder somewhere, saying "it's only 1.3 gigabytes".  Performance picked up greatly so I told her now she has to start one of the metagames of The Sims where you try to figure out which mod dicks over your game.  And then the PSU exploded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 17, 2010, 02:57:47 PM
It might just be the game trying to access 1.3 gigabytes of data...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on February 17, 2010, 03:06:48 PM
Quote
Anyway, why should I NOT put three video cards in it?

Because it probably has zero to do with the graphics cards. I'd wager it has more to do with memory leaks, caching and generally shitty code. I bet if you strip everything, reformat and only install TS3 and never anything else, it'll run like butter.

Get her a netbook for everything else. Har.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 17, 2010, 03:31:06 PM
Quote
Anyway, why should I NOT put three video cards in it?

Because it probably has zero to do with the graphics cards. I'd wager it has more to do with memory leaks, caching and generally shitty code. I bet if you strip everything, reformat and only install TS3 and never anything else, it'll run like butter.

You are correct but I have discovered that the real reason is that the PCIE slots 2 and 3 are too close together to hold a pair of 5850s, so I can't physically get three in there.

Anyway I have to buy a PSU first. :oh_i_see:

It might just be the game trying to access 1.3 gigabytes of data...

Yeah, when she said that, I made this face:
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/85916/oj-simpson-mugshot.jpg)

Then when the PSU shot fire and smoke, this was me:
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/85916/darren.png)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 18, 2010, 06:49:20 AM
Anyway, why should I NOT put three video cards in it?
:popcorn:

And then the PSU exploded.
:rimshot:

You know for the cost of those 3 video cards, some serious cooling solution (unless you spaghetti monstered your wife's rig as well), the bitchin new sound system to overcome the jet engine that is now her case and that new 1200 watt PSU you will need to run them you could just go get her a nice 160gb Intel SSD which should load those 1.3gb of textures incredibly fast.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 18, 2010, 06:56:26 AM
Hey anyone have some software and settings they would recommend to rip my DVD collection to my PC for streaming to my PS3? 

I'm already using the w7 media server and have that streaming fine I just wondered how to convert my existing DVD collection to some aXXo quality (700mb per movie) ps3 compatible files.

I'm hoping this will prevent me having to repurchase the Little Mermaid over and over again, Disney needs to start packaging their crack in brown paper bags so the kid doesn't feel the burning desire to play with the DVD's.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 18, 2010, 09:51:06 AM
you could just go get her a nice 160gb Intel SSD which should load those 1.3gb of textures incredibly fast.

This is not out of consideration, but I'd be interested in making sure the bottleneck is disk-read.  The dead PSU has bought me some time.  My list is currently some sort of PSU +500W, two 5850, some "aftermarket cooling", and a SSD.  Probably another 4GB RAM too.  Unless, of course, I can demonstrate that it is one or more bad CC items.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 18, 2010, 02:52:47 PM
I really don't think the video card was your problem.

Disk access and memory are probably the biggest concerns.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: 01101010 on February 18, 2010, 04:19:45 PM
2 quick questions. I upgraded my DDR2 from a pair of 1gig chips to a pair of 2gig chips. I have two pairs of slots on my gigabyte board and for shits and giggles plugged them all in. Now my gigabyte board was pretty cheap but its fairly flexible in overclocking and whatnot - but its ez-mode since it color codes the slots into pairs, red and yellow - so yes they were paired appropriately. Plugging them all in, fired up the machine and it auto-located all 6 and booted fine. I superficially checked the mem with cpu-z and the 2gig chips were reading ok but the 1gig chips were severely under clocked. A lot of bad noise and a BSOD/reboot later, I figured I would remove the old pair of 1gigs and see if the new pair was the culprit. Tore down the box and pulled the 1 gig pair out. Running stable now with just the two new 2gig chips but would there be any reason the 1gig pair would make my pc unstable? The ram is PC8500 with 5-5-5-15 @2.1V (same manufacturer), for all 4 chips but the pairs don't seem to play nice with each other. I had the 1 gig chips in the pc for over a year now so I know they were stable. I have no issue with running 4gigs on this WIN7-64bit machine, but 6 should have been ok unless I missed a day in school.

Also, why would a mobo autoset ram to a 5-7-7-24 2.0V timing? Is this an issue of a default setting or a board that is unable to read the mem correctly and runs it on a slower latency at a lower voltage for safety reasons? When I built this box I noticed the timings were off and manually set them in the BIOS (though completely forgot to set the voltage to 2.1V which was a fun 45 minutes wasted). However, when I plugged the new ram in it again defaulted down to the 5-7-7-24 timing. Manually reset it and upped the voltage and its running stable, though I am curious as to those timings.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 18, 2010, 05:12:32 PM
you could just go get her a nice 160gb Intel SSD which should load those 1.3gb of textures incredibly fast.

This is not out of consideration, but I'd be interested in making sure the bottleneck is disk-read.  The dead PSU has bought me some time.  My list is currently some sort of PSU +500W, two 5850, some "aftermarket cooling", and a SSD.  Probably another 4GB RAM too.  Unless, of course, I can demonstrate that it is one or more bad CC items.

If you are serious about the SLI you may want to aim for a PSU in the 700+ range.  I still think your issue is more related to disk access and a SSD probably has more noticeable performance impact than any other upgrade you could do.  If you were experiencing problems like screen tearing or freezing I would say more vid card and RAM but what you described earlier sounded like a texture load type of thing and the bottleneck there is disk access.

If you read any of the reviews most of them say an SSD doesn't make actual game play faster but they do all but eliminate load time when starting up or zoning (aka loading new textures).

Then again maybe your goal is to justify all these expenses to the wife in the name of "fixing the problem" then once the system is totally pimped and nothing is left to spend money on you go for the SSD and actually fix the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 18, 2010, 06:08:51 PM
stuff

Basically, ya, all mobos will set ram timings to a default 'safe' level; it can't read the timings on the ram's spec sheet, since those are timings are not set in the ram itself. Its just that the manufacturers know that they will run at those timings well.

As to why you can't run two pairs, its unclear to me. Were you manually setting the timings at the time when you put all 4 in, or did you let them autoconfigure at 'loose' timings? Also, can you define 'severely underclocked' regarding the two 1gig sticks in CPU-Z? Do you mean that they had lower hertz ratings than the 2 gig sticks?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: 01101010 on February 19, 2010, 03:03:17 AM
stuff

Basically, ya, all mobos will set ram timings to a default 'safe' level; it can't read the timings on the ram's spec sheet, since those are timings are not set in the ram itself. Its just that the manufacturers know that they will run at those timings well.

As to why you can't run two pairs, its unclear to me. Were you manually setting the timings at the time when you put all 4 in, or did you let them autoconfigure at 'loose' timings? Also, can you define 'severely underclocked' regarding the two 1gig sticks in CPU-Z? Do you mean that they had lower hertz ratings than the 2 gig sticks?

When I plugged all 4 sticks in, I let the mobo set them. Perhaps severely underclocked would not be the appropriate way to put it, but the 2gig sticks were EPP 400 and the 1gig sticks were EPP 333. It ran for about 30 minutes before getting cock-eyed and resetting. I then manually set the timings and voltages and it lasted all of 5 minutes before puking up blue screen memory dumps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 19, 2010, 10:25:11 AM
And you're absolutely sure both sets of ram, the 2x2 and the 2x1 are both PC8500 with 5-5-5-15 @2.1V ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: 01101010 on February 19, 2010, 12:41:49 PM
And you're absolutely sure both sets of ram, the 2x2 and the 2x1 are both PC8500 with 5-5-5-15 @2.1V ?

Yes. OCZ 1066 PC8500 with 5-5-5-15 @2.1V on the labels. 1 pair 2gig, other pair 4gig. I will check tonight, but I may have missed something in the BIOS, either I forgot to set the voltage when all 6 gigs were in or something. I am going to feed the box the 6gig and check the mobo manual and see what shakes out. I really think this is my own error somewhere, but won't know till I get in there and make some ozone shred some years off my life. I'll check back when I fuck around with it. I just wanted to know I wasn't crazy thinking all 6 would run being the same manufacturer, speed, and timings only with different sizes.

And trust me, I can live with 4 gig - but I'd rather not have 2gig just sitting around the desk with no purpose.

--edit: after playing around with it (and watching my computer BSOD and freeze three or four times) and checking various gigabyte and tweaker/overclocker forums I come to find out its my board that is shafting me. It has major problems pushing 1066 if all the chips are not the same. If I lower that down, it will involve more fucking around than my patience will allow at this point. Suffice it to say, I got what I paid for in the board and the 4gigs running now is stable @ 1066 5-5-5-15 running at 2.15V. So meh...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 19, 2010, 01:29:38 PM
Question: I juse AVG (free), and it seems to work well. In that I haven't had a problem yet, except with LinkScanner which "blocks dangerous websites and checks links on the most popular search engines for threats".

The problem is that with this feature happens, I have a 25% chance of timing-out on any web activity, from opening a page to switching views in my online banking to posting on F13. I don't know what exactly was causing the timeout, just that it was this feature which is the culprit.

I disabled that one features of AVG, but I rather liked the theory behind it. Anyone else experience this problem?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on February 21, 2010, 10:32:55 AM
I had a problem that has kind of the same symptoms but it wasn't related to AVG at all. For some reason I found myself getting intermittent DNS failures when using Firefox. If I hit refresh a couple of times the page would load but it was annoying. After putting up with it for weeks I finally did a little investigating.  Over on the Firefox website they claim that it's really caused by a bug in my router (in my case a DSL wireless modem/router) but they had a fix that I could make by editing the about:config page.

I made the change a couple of days ago and haven't had the problem since so it seems to have worked.

Anyway, here's a link to the problem and solution in case any of you are having this:

http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/548813?s=DNS%20failure&as=q (http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/548813?s=DNS%20failure&as=q)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 26, 2010, 05:03:06 PM
Thanks. And sorry for the double post. After some research (and because it impacted all of my browsers), it turned out to be the LinkScanner thing. I think it's because the LinkScanner is constantly comparing where you're going to their own server-side database.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on March 03, 2010, 09:09:17 AM
Just a heads up for anyone buying a hard drive soon.

WD is flipping over to 4k sectors on any drives designated by the "EARS" or "Advance Format" line. None of these drives are recognized by XP.

You have to run a alignment utility to use the hard drive with XP or run Vista/7. I'm caught out because it's for a Windows Home Server which is based on Server 2003 which has no native support. The drive will have a single partition for my datastore so I can use the jumpered offset legacy support.  :oh_i_see:

Edit:
AnandTech (http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3691) has an article with tech details of the new 4K sector switch over.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: 01101010 on March 03, 2010, 12:16:35 PM
Just a heads up for anyone buying a hard drive soon.

WD is flipping over to 4k sectors on any drives designated by the "EARS" or "Advance Format" line. None of these drives are recognized by XP.

You have to run a alignment utility to use the hard drive with XP or run Vista/7. I'm caught out because it's for a Windows Home Server which is based on Server 2003 which has no native support. The drive will have a single partition for my datastore so I can use the jumpered offset legacy support.  :oh_i_see:

Edit:
AnandTech (http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3691) has an article with tech details of the new 4K sector switch over.

Is it wrong that I read that whole thing and actually found it interesting?  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 03, 2010, 12:23:48 PM
I did, too. Then sent it along to a bunch of people. I missed that at some point, nice to have the heads-up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 04, 2010, 10:35:29 PM
Question: Anyone have a GIGABYTE GA-P55M-UD2?  The chipset drivers on the supplied disk and website all seem to be for RAID controllers, but the Engrish in the manual is a tad bewildering.  To install or not to install?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 05, 2010, 08:30:36 PM
Question: ok really baffled here.

I have two MS Excel 2007 files. I try to copy dates from one file to the other. In the process of copying from File A to File B, the year increases by 4 years and 1 day.

I have tried everything, from linking the data to converting it to text. In addition to just manually typing the dates myself, I also "wash" it through Notepad (copy to Notepad, paste, copy out to File B). This is fine since there's not that  much data yet. But in time there will be.

What the heck is going on? There some document property in File A that says "subtract whatever date is entered by four years and one day"?!

Edit: Think I found something. An option called "Use 1904 date system". Does anyone use that at all? Sure nuf when I uncheck it, all the dates lose four years and a day. Why the hell does this option exist?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 05, 2010, 08:44:51 PM
Some legacy program that Excel can import data from would be my guess, without bothering to do any search.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 05, 2010, 10:10:14 PM
Mac support :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on March 10, 2010, 07:23:52 AM
5 devices trying to access a network through ethernet. 4 port router. Easiest solution for getting that 1 extra device connected to the router? Would it work connected a hub to one of the ports and connecting the last 2 devices to that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 10, 2010, 08:55:19 AM
Probably. Unless the device is a toaster. Then you're SOL.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on March 10, 2010, 11:49:12 AM
Probably. Unless the device is a toaster. Then you're SOL.

FUUUUUUUUUUUUU!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 11, 2010, 01:55:41 PM
the easiest solution would be to just upgrade to an 8-12 port router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on March 15, 2010, 09:45:03 AM
Accidentally deleted a video on my camera (Canon S90) while wiping my blurry shots. What's a good way to get it back? I've tried a few image recovery tools but none of them seem able to detect the camera. Windows picks it up no problem but it identifies as a camera rather than a removable hard-drive and none of the programs pick it up while looking for removable media things either. All they return are my 3 physical drives and CD drive. All the on-line tips just say to d/l one of these programs and seem to assume that they'll work fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rrazcueta on March 15, 2010, 04:48:06 PM
Anyone have headset or mic recommendations?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 15, 2010, 09:25:30 PM
Sennheiser.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Pennilenko on March 15, 2010, 09:40:13 PM
Anyone have headset or mic recommendations?

Plantronics


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 15, 2010, 09:46:42 PM
I've gotten a plantronics in the past. Although the sound quality is good, the comfort level was bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kageh on March 16, 2010, 07:14:57 AM
Sennheiser.

+1 vote for that. Or AKG, they make some very good headphones.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on March 16, 2010, 09:45:19 AM
Elaborating on earlier question: Problem is pretty obviously that the memory card loads as a logical drive inside the camera rather than the computer. I haven't got a card reader device so is there any way to take an image of the whole card and try data recovery that way or am I just going to have to get some way of reading the card directly to do it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 16, 2010, 05:15:18 PM
Want to rip a cdrom but WMP sucks.  Suggestions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2010, 06:22:50 PM
Want to rip a cdrom but WMP sucks.  Suggestions?
http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 16, 2010, 08:43:09 PM
Want to rip a cdrom but WMP sucks.  Suggestions?
http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/

(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/85916/eac.trojan.png)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2010, 10:41:51 PM
Sucks to be you :awesome_for_real:

It's probably complaining about the ebayshortcuts.exe file:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1546569


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on March 16, 2010, 11:57:09 PM
CDex (http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/) has never given me a virus.

I should probably add that it's a lot easier to use than EAC, as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ginaz on April 02, 2010, 12:44:16 AM
Quick question.  I can't use my Blu Ray disk drive because it says there is a problem with the driver.  I tried to update it but I can't because it doesn't show up anywhere.  Normally I can find it using My Computer.  It was listed as my E: drive.  I tried un-connecting and reconnecting the drive physically by opening up my computer but it doesn't work.  I have another drive from my old computer I can put in but I'd like to save that as a last resort.  Any suggestions?  Thanks.  And yes, I can't computer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 02, 2010, 06:53:30 AM
For XP (though should be similar on all WinOSs):

Open Control Panel -> Computer Management.  Once that is open, under Storage on the left, choose Disk Management.  Does the DVD drive show in the bottom left pane?  If so, you can right click and assign a drive letter.

If not, then does it show in the Device Manager list?  (Another tab in the left pane.)  Look either under the DVD/CD-ROM tab to the right, or for a question mark in an expanded tab.  If it shows there, you can install drivers by right-clicking and choosing the option.

If it doesn't, then your drive isn't being recognized by the computer at all.  Check your cables, both data and power.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ginaz on April 02, 2010, 09:56:04 PM
I was able to get it working by downloading something from the MS site called Mats_Run.dvd. Most likely it was a problem with the drivers. Anyways, everything is gtg now.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 03, 2010, 08:43:26 PM
Okay just bought a new laptop, anyone have recommendations for a laptop bag that will handle 17.3" for under $75?

P.S. - WTF is this a WLED, RGB LED or some other kinda LED (bonus points for actual brightness/contrast/gamut specs)?
Dell 17.3" FHD (1920 x 1080) TrueLife WLED (B+RG LED) 1080p


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on April 20, 2010, 08:14:00 AM
I'm wondering what the best way to save a whole webpage is for offline viewing, or chunk of a page.

Basically, there's some stuff that's disappeared, but I can still find (most of) it on one of the webarchives. However, it's 101 pages, and I'd like to save them while preserving the links, images, and navigatability.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 20, 2010, 09:19:48 AM
A webpage, or a website?

If it's a single page, just do a "save as..."  All the major browsers can grab everything linked.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on April 20, 2010, 02:04:37 PM
Well, a website. Or a former one nested within waybackmachine. But obviously not the whole wayback machine. 101 pages.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 22, 2010, 03:36:00 PM
http://www.sitesucker.us/home.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on April 27, 2010, 01:33:12 PM
I've got the stupidest little problem.  I'm trying to change a shortcut icon on Windows Vista 64 but for some reason the shortcut tab isn't showing up when I do a properties. Not on the shortcut I'm trying to change or on any of the shortcuts I've changed in the past.

I must have messed something up but Google isn't being very helpful today.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Snee on May 12, 2010, 08:53:27 AM
anyone have a relatively cheap wireless repeater they like?

I put my gaming box on wireless so I could move my dsl modem to a spot where its wireless would reach the roku in my living room.

my ping went up by a factor of 10 and I can't play anything.


Thanks for all advice.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 12, 2010, 10:38:59 AM
I have a sideways suggestion to look at using a powerline network extender.  Currently using a Cisco model to bridge my DSL modem to my consoles.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 13, 2010, 11:31:06 AM
Looks like I accidentally ordered a 5870 Eyefinity 6 instead of a normal 5870.  I discovered this when I tried to plug my monitor into it.  I am hoping that I am not doomed, but the fact that I seem to be relegated to a preview version of Catalyst 10.3 bodes ill.  Anyone have any experience here?  Should I just go ahead and return it for a non-flight-simulator card?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 13, 2010, 11:38:05 AM
I might have answered my own question since the installer won't actually install.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 13, 2010, 05:18:06 PM
I love newegg because they let me return things that have a No Return policy.  The Sapphire 5870 that I got the wife is sold out, so I was forced to get the 2GB version. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 14, 2010, 07:02:45 AM
When I first got my 8800GTX, there was a manufacturing defect from evga: memory heatsinks weren't sticking properly and they were very overclocked. Card kept crashing, I returned to evga (their packaging says to do so!), got another crashy one, returned that, got another crashy one that was a refurb. Finally I told them to fuck off, contacted newegg and told them the situation, by then it was outside newegg's return for replacement timeframe. Newegg allowed me to RMA the refurb to them and refunded me the money (I bought the non-overclocked version).

Newegg does indeed have good customer service. They listen to the customer and aren't scripted drones.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 14, 2010, 08:46:27 AM
I love newegg because they let me return things that have a No Return policy.  The Sapphire 5870 that I got the wife is sold out, so I was forced to get the 2GB version. :oh_i_see:

Wait, I'm not sure I get why the eyefinity version isn't desireable, even if you're not going to use the multi monitor set up? I have the 'regular' 5870, and I have quietly cursed myself for not waiting to get the eyefinity one, in case I decide that that's something I'd like to do some day. Now it sounds as if you're saying the eyefinity version won't work as a 'normal' vid card? Is the performance gimped when used on only one monitor?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 14, 2010, 10:53:40 AM
I love newegg because they let me return things that have a No Return policy.  The Sapphire 5870 that I got the wife is sold out, so I was forced to get the 2GB version. :oh_i_see:

Wait, I'm not sure I get why the eyefinity version isn't desireable, even if you're not going to use the multi monitor set up? I have the 'regular' 5870, and I have quietly cursed myself for not waiting to get the eyefinity one, in case I decide that that's something I'd like to do some day. Now it sounds as if you're saying the eyefinity version won't work as a 'normal' vid card? Is the performance gimped when used on only one monitor?

The one I had did not have any DVI ports, instead it had six other ports and a few dongles.  I tried to make it work but the problem was the Catalyst installer on the CD and the one I downloaded from ATi just would not install the drivers.  I'm sure it would have been awesome to have six monitors (:uhrr:) but... well the stock Win7 drivers won't help me with that and they didn't even offer my native resolution and so everything looked like shit.  The one I ordered to replace it will support Eyefinity, as my wife's does, but it also has a pair of DVI ports and I expect it will use the normal Catalyst branch.

Have I ever mentioned how much I despise ATi?

I reinstalled the 9800 GTX instead of trying out the 4870 I removed from my wife's PC.  After that I noticed one of my hard disks and my DVD drive did not come back, so I had to shut her down, wiggle some wires and boot up again.  Looking like it is time to start researching a new build.

EDIT: The card in question. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102888)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 14, 2010, 11:19:03 AM
I loathe displayport. There's a reason they put little screws on monitor cable ends. When I upgraded about twenty mac minis from DVI to DisplayPort, the #1 complaint was "My monitor just shut off", meaning they had jostled the computer and the monitor came unplugged at the displayport end. Hasn't happened recently, but now people are doing things like standing their computers up on the face so the ports stick straight up...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 14, 2010, 04:00:53 PM
Hmm, that's super odd Yego. I am wondering if it had to do with the dongle and your monitor. Some monitors might lose their HDMI compliance when you use a dongle. They essentially don't allow the 'authentication code' or whatever it is to traverse the dongle so your vid card won't even allow the drivers to install. I'm pulling this theory out of my vaguely informed posterior.

I had a situation perhaps similar back in the day; I had a DVI/VGA monitor, and I tried to use the DVI port. When I installed the Netflix player, the installer said that my monitor was not HDMI compliant so I couldn't use the player. I then switched to VGA and the thing worked. Later on, my monitor was added to a list of a approved hardware, and I could use DVI again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 17, 2010, 06:04:23 AM
I'd like to think that there would be some visible error if it was programmed that way.  Since the installer processes die without an utterance, I'm going to blame shitty programming.  Besides that, the Win7 driver worked well enough that I could use my machine, it just didn't support 1680x1050.

I later found a 10.5 version of Catalyst (CD was 10.2 and ATi's was 10.3) on Sapphire's web site, but since I had already finagled a RMA for a card I didn't want anyway, I didn't bother.  I had concerns about the lack of screws, and Sky just confirmed my suspicions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 18, 2010, 06:47:53 PM
Installed the new 5870, a Vapor-X 2GB one, and the Catalyst shit would not install again.  I decided to skip the issue and applied the drivers directly, minus Catalyst.  Works great, and I still hate ATI.

Apparently they are no longer "ATi".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 18, 2010, 07:02:56 PM
Never heard of Vapor...off-brand? Would that even make a difference?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 18, 2010, 07:13:55 PM
If memory serves, the Catalyst Control Center requires the C++ redistributable. I'd uninstall whichever one you have installed and try again. The CCC should reinstall. However, before uninstalling, note the version number and find the download so you can reinstall in case the CCC installation doesn't work. Other programs might depend on it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 18, 2010, 09:05:13 PM
Installed the new 5870, a Vapor-X 2GB one, and the Catalyst shit would not install again.  I decided to skip the issue and applied the drivers directly, minus Catalyst.  Works great, and I still hate ATI.
This is why I shall never buy ATI again.  Not worth the headaches.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on May 18, 2010, 09:55:10 PM
Vapor-X is just Sapphire's heatpipe cooling system name. It's cooler and quieter than stock, and what Sapphire uses on all their oc'd cards. Toxic, and Atomics.

And Yeg is just special, I've been using ATI cards since the 4870 hit, and had no driver issues like his.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 19, 2010, 08:36:59 AM
I tend to be special when dealing with their cards, too.  You might be fine, but I never have been.  Fool me once, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on May 19, 2010, 09:38:04 AM
Anybody know a good way to search through (multiple) pdfs on both windows 7 and linux? (Academics, give me an answer!)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 19, 2010, 10:26:27 AM
Search for keywords on many PDFs at the same time you mean, rather than opening one, doing the search function, etc?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2010, 11:25:05 AM
Anybody know a good way to search through (multiple) pdfs on both windows 7 and linux? (Academics, give me an answer!)
Get a Mac? :awesome_for_real: (Spotlight can index PDFs for searching)

Actually Windows Search can do it too if you have the Adobe PDF iFilter installed and configured correctly.

Linux, use grep? :why_so_serious: (No clue)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on May 19, 2010, 11:31:31 AM
If memory serves, the Catalyst Control Center requires the C++ redistributable.

It might be .Net.

The ATi drivers themselves aren't so bad aside from weird glitches with some games.  The CCC utility is bloated, sweaty and hairy man ass.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on May 19, 2010, 03:42:36 PM
Search for keywords on many PDFs at the same time you mean, rather than opening one, doing the search function, etc?

Exactly. My sup was using spotlight (damn you Trippy...) and a little bit of me died inside. I've been using google desktop, but I'm not sure how well it works and it can't do any of the other fancy things spotlight does. And I still need a solution for my ubuntu netbook...

A lot of the papers I need to read for my thesis aren't journal papers but conference ones, making it much easier to find things by indexing, tagging, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 19, 2010, 08:06:44 PM
If memory serves, the Catalyst Control Center requires the C++ redistributable.

It might be .Net.

The ATi drivers themselves aren't so bad aside from weird glitches with some games.  The CCC utility is bloated, sweaty and hairy man ass.

That's it. So, hum, maybe .Net is horked. I've seen it happen with installations of other programs. AutoCad 2006, for one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 20, 2010, 06:58:11 AM
Get a Mac? :awesome_for_real: (Spotlight can index PDFs for searching)
I'm interested in this as well. We're using Spotlight to search pdfs of our local paper and I want a good way to do it in windows. We're still mostly on XP, though.

As an aside, pdfs of newspapers from the printer are wicked to play around with. Great photos, selectable and searchable text. An amazing leap from microfilm  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on May 20, 2010, 07:57:23 AM
How the hell did PDF's become so widely used for archival purposes without being able to easily search the contents of several documents?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on May 20, 2010, 08:09:06 AM
Um ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 20, 2010, 09:32:32 AM
And Yeg is just special, I've been using ATI cards since the 4870 hit, and had no driver issues like his.

I am.  The ATI cards on my wife's machine, which I built myself and used the same Win7 media for install, work perfectly.  Catalyst installs and everything.  No time or interest in digging that deep, though.  I'll just root for Nvidia to make better cards one day rather than fuck around with my .NET installation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 20, 2010, 11:44:28 AM
How the hell did PDF's become so widely used for archival purposes without being able to easily search the contents of several documents?
(Spotlight can index PDFs for searching)
We're using Spotlight to search pdfs
Sounds like a windows issue, not a pdf issue  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 20, 2010, 12:02:41 PM
Get a Mac? :awesome_for_real: (Spotlight can index PDFs for searching)
I'm interested in this as well. We're using Spotlight to search pdfs of our local paper and I want a good way to do it in windows. We're still mostly on XP, though.
Windows Search is available for XP. However I'm not sure if iFilters work on the XP versiom (docs imply that feature is >= Vista).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on May 21, 2010, 12:19:14 AM
You can search the internal contents of files in anything XP+, it just seems to exclude PDF's.  The OS doesn't seem to consider it a text file, which is Adobe's problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 21, 2010, 12:22:05 AM
That's what IFilters are for in Windows Search. Vendors with their own formats can have Windows Search index the content if they provide the IFilters.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Polysorbate80 on May 26, 2010, 01:29:42 PM
Anyone have suggestions for a good wireless mouse and/or keyboard with a range of ~20'? 

Doesn't have to be gaming quality, just a solid connection.  This is to drive the htpc in my basement via kvm extender from my living room.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 26, 2010, 02:02:05 PM
I've had two logitech keyb/m with RF tech that have sucked balls. Lots of signal drop, I've taken to just putting the receiver on my coffee table. Might not be bad for non-gaming, as it's mostly a problem with click & drag type commands (in gaming, right clicking to move the camera or something).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 26, 2010, 03:21:48 PM
I've had two logitech keyb/m with RF tech that have sucked balls. Lots of signal drop, I've taken to just putting the receiver on my coffee table. Might not be bad for non-gaming, as it's mostly a problem with click & drag type commands (in gaming, right clicking to move the camera or something).

I have never used a wireless keyboard that I was happy with but the Logitech Performance MX mouse I bought a few weeks ago is probably the best mouse I have ever used and it works from 20 feet easily.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 26, 2010, 03:30:39 PM
I've owned at least 3 Logitech Comfort Cordless keyboards and they've never had any issues, other than getting scuzzy and having to replace them because of that. Its the only keyboard I really love. As far as Mice are concerned, I have no real opinion.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 27, 2010, 07:14:17 AM
I dunno, I've had problems with two different models on two different computers in two different living situations. Maybe it's interference or something. Even now, while I'm set up in the den while construction drags on in the living room, I still get interference, not sure what could be causing it.

The one I'm using now: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823126007


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 27, 2010, 03:49:05 PM
Blech. Looks like my fave has been discontinued. I'm gonna get real angsty when I have to find a replacement sometime in the future.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Megrim on June 02, 2010, 08:38:16 PM
I didn't want to derail WUA's BG thread, so i figured i'd ask in here: has anyone had success running Baldur's Gate tcp/ip multiplayer games on Vista? If so, then how? My mates and i are trying to set up a game, but we'll be damned if we can get it to connect.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 03, 2010, 07:43:42 AM
At a guess there are ports you'll need to open up in the firewall.  No idea what they are or time to search right now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Megrim on June 03, 2010, 08:46:55 AM
Nah, it's not the ports. We tried for a day straight and figured it wasn't worth the trouble. We did manage to get BG2 working over hamachi. Six man failtrain here we come.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on June 06, 2010, 11:22:00 PM
New question for you gurus:

In Windows XP, when you are connected to the net, you had the option of displaying a connection icon in the system tray, with blinkin lights that would indicate that there was network traffic going on when your connection was doing something.

I would like to know if there is any similar function available for Win 7.  Currently, the only thing i have been able to find is the "network" icon, which only indicates if my connection is connected / disconnected.  No option appears to be available to indicate if there is actual network traffic going on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on June 07, 2010, 12:26:35 AM

No?

Link (http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Windows+7+network+blink)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on June 07, 2010, 08:35:51 AM
I wouldn't trust the blinking light in the tray to tell me if the connection was working properly or not anyway.

netstat like sheepherder said above, or even ping or tracert would be more accurate.  Or sysmon will tell you statistics like packets sent/lost and etc...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on June 07, 2010, 10:35:49 AM
Or wireshark (http://www.wireshark.org/download.html).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 07, 2010, 04:29:14 PM
Well, now, that looks fancy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 07, 2010, 08:04:12 PM
Running a wireshark packet capture full time just to know you have "network activity" seems a bit  :ye_gods: to me.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on June 07, 2010, 08:55:00 PM
Wanting blinking lights so that you know when arbitrary amounts of data is being sent/received seems pointless.

Does it say connected?  If so, it's sending data.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on June 07, 2010, 09:40:25 PM
I dont know, I just liked the blinking light because it told me my connection was doing something.   No blinking lights, connection is connected but idle.  Suddenly the lights start blinking; could make me curious enough to check and find out hey, my torrent program started itself up in the background and is downloading shit, or hey my antivirus is updating itself.

With the current blank, no blinking lights icon, i could be working away typeing out a doccument or something, and my computer could be busy downloading gigs of shit in the background and i would have no way of knowing my connection is even transmiting data.

I dont really need to know EVERYTHING that my connection is doing, but knowing more then just "hey, your connection is connected" would be nice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 07, 2010, 09:54:22 PM
I use something called NetMeter 1.1.3 (http://www.softpedia.com/get/PORTABLE-SOFTWARE/Network/Windows-Portable-Applications-Portable-NetMeter.shtml).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on June 07, 2010, 09:57:25 PM
How about a desktop widget?

http://gallery.live.com/results.aspx?bt=1&pl=1&ds=2&la=en&tier=0&st=1&p=1&q=network&c=0


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 09, 2010, 08:40:41 AM
Is there a qick and permanent way to enable/disable the touchpad on a dell studio laptop?  Currently I uninstall it using the device manager but I would rather something more along the lines of a disable/enable toggle, plus if I forget to turn on my wireless mouse it reinstalls the touchpad on startup.

I pretty much want it off all the time except for when I am in a car or on a plane.  If all else fails I may go low tech and cover the thing up with something.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on June 09, 2010, 09:20:23 AM
Do you have the Dell laptop tools installed? They sometimes have a touchpad "app" that runs next to your clock on the taskbar, with the option to disable it with a right-click menu.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 09, 2010, 11:28:23 AM
Do you have the Dell laptop tools installed? They sometimes have a touchpad "app" that runs next to your clock on the taskbar, with the option to disable it with a right-click menu.

Yeah I suppose therein lies the problem behind my problem.  The dell touchpad app had a serious conflict with virtualbox guest additions so I removed it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on June 09, 2010, 01:03:28 PM
Guess you have to figure out which one you want more.  :grin:

Did you try updated touchpad drivers?
http://www.synaptics.com/support/drivers


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on June 09, 2010, 02:06:18 PM
Device console (http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=311272) + Batch file.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 09, 2010, 02:42:35 PM
Device console (http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=311272) + Batch file.

Thank i'll give that a try.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on June 10, 2010, 01:32:25 PM
There is a folder in my recycle bin that is pissing me the fuck off. It's named "Dd26" right now. When I try and empty the bin, delete it or restore it I get an "Access is denied" box. The program Unlocker can delete it but it instantly comes back as "Dd27" and so on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on June 11, 2010, 12:54:30 AM
Sounds like a virus.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 11, 2010, 06:53:18 AM
Very much a virus behavior.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on June 11, 2010, 10:52:35 AM
It seems like I would have something else going on other than that but nothing else weird is happening. Always have had Avast running, never any red flags and scanning finds nothing. I can't really think of how I could have gotten a virus either, I don't really do anything except go to the same few websites every day.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 12, 2010, 08:58:14 AM
If its really bugging you, burn a copy of Parted Magic, boot to it from CD, then navigate to C:\$Recycle.Bin and nuke it there. Be sure to have 'show hidden system folders' checked in the view options.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 12, 2010, 11:14:57 AM
He can delete it but it comes right back. The question is what is creating that directory in there?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on June 26, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Question, I need a new laptop and was toying with getting a new Mac Book Pro.
I play TF2 and WoW, so really dont need a powerful computer but I was wondering, for 2,500 what is the best PC laptop manufacturer to go with? I don't mind the wallet-rape for going with a mac, but if there was a solid PC laptop that wasn't an obtrusive looking pain to carry around, I might choose that instead.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Pennilenko on June 26, 2010, 02:51:48 PM
2500 should get you two or three times the machine with any manufacturer compared to a mac book.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 26, 2010, 11:07:40 PM
What size are you looking for? The video card on a Mac Book Pro 13 isn't bad, but due to internal size restrictions, it has kept a Core 2 Duo class processor rather than going to the i3/i5/i7 series. For less money, you can get a seriously pimped out Alienware 17 inch from Dell. For the amount you want to spend, you have many many options open to you. Since your gaming is fairly light, I'd go for other features, such as a solid state drive. You could probably get away with a Dell Studio 15 with a 'decent' video card (the ATI radeon) and then splurge on an aftermarket solid state drive (only do this if you're comfortable and have access to disk cloning software). Alternately, a Dell Studio XPS 16 might do ya. With a 250 GB SSD, 4 gig of ram and an i7, you'd spend ~$1800

Another thing to note is that even if there are TF2 and Wow ports, the peformance for most games, especially TF2, are not very great on a Mac Book Pro. They are definately playable, don't get me wrong, but Macs have to use GL for graphics while Windows uses DirectX, which for now is a much better platform for games. It may change in the future, if Mac ever gets serious about their computer being a gaming platform, but I'm not holding my breath.

If there's a new game you want to play that's Windows only, you'd have to go the boot camp route too, so factor that pricing into the equation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 27, 2010, 04:23:47 AM
What size are you looking for? The video card on a Mac Book Pro 13 isn't bad, but due to internal size restrictions, it has kept a Core 2 Duo class processor rather than going to the i3/i5/i7 series.
The latest MacBook Pros use the i5 and i7. The NVIDIA 330M is an okay gaming GPU but with a $2500 budget you can do a lot better than that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on June 27, 2010, 06:31:15 AM
Any suggestions on an all-in-one printer? Shopping for my mom who uses scanning, copying, printing in both b&w and color. Both mac & pc compatible and wireless networking capable. She has a disliking of HP so it can't be that brand. Budget of ~$300


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 27, 2010, 10:17:21 AM
What size are you looking for? The video card on a Mac Book Pro 13 isn't bad, but due to internal size restrictions, it has kept a Core 2 Duo class processor rather than going to the i3/i5/i7 series.
The latest MacBook Pros use the i5 and i7. The NVIDIA 330M is an okay gaming GPU but with a $2500 budget you can do a lot better than that.


I was only referring to the 13 in ch MacBook Pro, which is stuck to the Core2Duo. The 15 and 17 do use the i series processors.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on June 27, 2010, 10:41:24 AM
Any suggestions on an all-in-one printer? Shopping for my mom who uses scanning, copying, printing in both b&w and color. Both mac & pc compatible and wireless networking capable. She has a disliking of HP so it can't be that brand. Budget of ~$300

I've had very good experiences with Epson printers, but not that kind of all-in-one, only photo printers. All-in-ones have a habit of being very unreliable because there's too much packed into one box. It's like the TV+DVD combos... they're shit at the end of the day.

My approach would be to get a decent printer and then save up a bit longer and get a decent scanner too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 27, 2010, 12:29:20 PM
What size are you looking for? The video card on a Mac Book Pro 13 isn't bad, but due to internal size restrictions, it has kept a Core 2 Duo class processor rather than going to the i3/i5/i7 series.
The latest MacBook Pros use the i5 and i7. The NVIDIA 330M is an okay gaming GPU but with a $2500 budget you can do a lot better than that.
I was only referring to the 13 in ch MacBook Pro, which is stuck to the Core2Duo. The 15 and 17 do use the i series processors.
Ah, right, I missed that part.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on June 27, 2010, 02:18:19 PM
Any suggestions on an all-in-one printer? Shopping for my mom who uses scanning, copying, printing in both b&w and color. Both mac & pc compatible and wireless networking capable. She has a disliking of HP so it can't be that brand. Budget of ~$300

I've had very good experiences with Epson printers, but not that kind of all-in-one, only photo printers. All-in-ones have a habit of being very unreliable because there's too much packed into one box. It's like the TV+DVD combos... they're shit at the end of the day.

My approach would be to get a decent printer and then save up a bit longer and get a decent scanner too.

Thanks for the tip on epson, I never tried them that I know of. While I agree all in one are a bit of a waste and lower quality in the few I've seen, my mom likes having the all in one since she and my dad do a lot of traveling by RV during winter, so space is an issue as well as having the copier/scanner being really helpful for them on the road with the stuff they use it for. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 12, 2010, 10:38:55 AM
Question: Can I mix DDR 2 with DDR 3 memory sticks?

I currently have 4gb of DDR 2 (2 x 2gb), was looking to fill the other slots. Was wondering if I can toss some DDR 3 in there to take me up to 8gb. I have this motherboard. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131196)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 12, 2010, 12:17:15 PM
Uhm, from what I can see that motherboard only has DDR2 slots. But even if you had the fairly rare hybrid dual memory type board, you could only use one type at a time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 12, 2010, 12:20:17 PM
Uhm, from what I can see that motherboard only has DDR2 slots. But even if you had the fairly rare hybrid dual memory type board, you could only use one type at a time.

Answers that then, I was slightly confused by the use of "standard" in that line.

Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 12, 2010, 05:35:14 PM
Weird start up issue.  Sometimes freezes on on bios, other times makes it all the way to desktop. Then it freezes.  If I can make it past the first 45 seconds, I'm good to go.  If it freezes, the only thing to do is press the power button and try a reboot.

Oddities noted:  Most often occurs just after opening IE.  When it freezes on bios, it freezes at the "INITIALIZING USB CONTROLLERS" message.

I5-750 at 3.8Ghz
MSI P55-GD65 mobo
8 GB of RAM
EVGA GTX 470 GPU
Seagate Barracuda 1TB HDD
Corsair 850W PSU
Corsair H50 water cooler, using two Corsair fans in a push/pull exhaust configuration
Using latest bios (1.8 I think)
Windows is up to date - FWIW, this has occurred on two fresh installs of W7 64
Using onboard sound with Triton AX720 headphones connected via digital optical
Logitech X540 connected through other onboard sound.

Heat is not an issue (29-32C idle, 58-61C load under Prime95).  RAM has been tested with memtest and I've swapped it all out and tested a stick at a time.  I get spectacular results in all my games, so no performance problems there.  Just the odd hard freeze on boot/start up.

I'm thinking a flaky mobo, as the RAM has been tested and swapped.  I've yanked the GTX 470 out and put in a spare 8800GTS G92. 

Halp?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 12, 2010, 05:45:43 PM
Bloodworth, I wouldn't sweat the extra ram too much, either. Folks are all agog over shittons of ram, but I have yet to throw anything at my PC that's needed more than 4.

SnakeCharmer, do you have anything odd plugged into your USB slots? Could be a dying keyboard (I have had MAJOR issues with a Razer keyboard which I had to trash cuz it bugged out my machine so bad) or a drive that powers off USB and has power issues, or something like that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 12, 2010, 05:47:27 PM
Yeah.  What USB devices do you have plugged in?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 12, 2010, 06:16:13 PM
SnakeCharmer, do you have anything odd plugged into your USB slots? Could be a dying keyboard (I have had MAJOR issues with a Razer keyboard which I had to trash cuz it bugged out my machine so bad) or a drive that powers off USB and has power issues, or something like that.

No, nothing odd.  Just a new G110 keyboard (replacing a Lycosis keyboard) and a MX518 mouse.  No webcam, no external HDD.  The Triton AX720 connects to both optical and USB (for the mic).  The start up issue was there when I had the Lycosis as well.    I'm trying to remember if the Razer keyboard was used on my second Windows install trying to find a cure...Either way, the drivers and such for it have been long removed. 

But that's it.  Nothing else.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 12, 2010, 07:41:19 PM
Do you have non-motherboard USB slots that are connected via cable to the motherboard? Front case USB ports connect that way. If so, are you using them? I'd do a process of elimination and unplug the front USB slots from the motherboard via the motherboard's connector, see if that clears it up.

If not, it sounds like some electronic fault on the motherboard's native USB functionality, in which case, do the reverse; use the front connectors through the motherboard's connector, and don't use the back native USB connectors. There may even be a way of disabling, through BIOS, certain USB ports. I don't know this for a fact, tho. You'd have to poke about in BIOS to see.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 12, 2010, 08:21:35 PM
Weird start up issue.  Sometimes freezes on on bios, other times makes it all the way to desktop. Then it freezes.  If I can make it past the first 45 seconds, I'm good to go.  If it freezes, the only thing to do is press the power button and try a reboot.

Oddities noted:  Most often occurs just after opening IE.  When it freezes on bios, it freezes at the "INITIALIZING USB CONTROLLERS" message.

I5-750 at 3.8Ghz
MSI P55-GD65 mobo
8 GB of RAM
EVGA GTX 470 GPU
Seagate Barracuda 1TB HDD
Corsair 850W PSU
Corsair H50 water cooler, using two Corsair fans in a push/pull exhaust configuration
Using latest bios (1.8 I think)
Windows is up to date - FWIW, this has occurred on two fresh installs of W7 64
Using onboard sound with Triton AX720 headphones connected via digital optical
Logitech X540 connected through other onboard sound.

Heat is not an issue (29-32C idle, 58-61C load under Prime95).  RAM has been tested with memtest and I've swapped it all out and tested a stick at a time.  I get spectacular results in all my games, so no performance problems there.  Just the odd hard freeze on boot/start up.

I'm thinking a flaky mobo, as the RAM has been tested and swapped.  I've yanked the GTX 470 out and put in a spare 8800GTS G92. 

Halp?
I'd say MB or PS, probably MB. The fact it works okay after a bit suggests as the temperature of components increases some connection is being (re)made that isn't when things are cold. Once the system's working, if you turn it off and then immediately turn it back on does it startup okay? How does this behavior contrast with starting up the computer that's been off for a while (like overnight)?

Another thing is is there some weird delay in terms of the water cooling system kicking in? Do you have a convention cooling system you can install to test this out?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 12, 2010, 10:30:54 PM
Gotta SirBruce it...Sorry...

I'd say MB or PS, probably MB.

Not the PSU.  I swapped out a slightly smaller one (750W, but still plenty of power on the 12v rails) and still had the same issue.

Quote
The fact it works okay after a bit suggests as the temperature of components increases some connection is being (re)made that isn't when things are cold. Once the system's working, if you turn it off and then immediately turn it back on does it startup okay?

Sometimes.  It's hit or miss.  But what you're saying makes complete and total sense.

Quote
How does this behavior contrast with starting up the computer that's been off for a while (like overnight)?

Sometimes it starts up fine, other times it freezes.  I know I sound like a broken record, but there's really no constant theme to it.

Quote
Another thing is is there some weird delay in terms of the water cooling system kicking in? Do you have a convention cooling system you can install to test this out?

I thought about that.  Even when I have it at stock speeds, would it heat up enough in the first 5 seconds to freeze up?  Because even when it's not overclocked, it still has a pretty good chance of freezing up on the bios screen at start up.  You can hear the pump 'click' as it starts up on power up.  I hate to take off the water cooler, but at this point I'm willing to try anything.  I've got the stock fan that came with it (somewhere).  Soon as I get a free hour or two, I'll put it on and see what happens.  The cooler is the only thing I haven't swapped out to narrow it down.  

I really really hope it's not the cooler, because I absolutely LOVE that thing.

Do you have non-motherboard USB slots that are connected via cable to the motherboard? Front case USB ports connect that way. If so, are you using them? I'd do a process of elimination and unplug the front USB slots from the motherboard via the motherboard's connector, see if that clears it up.

Just the front USB ports which aren't being used.

Quote
If not, it sounds like some electronic fault on the motherboard's native USB functionality, in which case, do the reverse; use the front connectors through the motherboard's connector, and don't use the back native USB connectors. There may even be a way of disabling, through BIOS, certain USB ports. I don't know this for a fact, tho. You'd have to poke about in BIOS to see.

I'll give it a shot and see what happens.  I need to see if I have something plugged into one of the new fangled 3.0 USB ports that shouldn't be and see if that is the issue...



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 13, 2010, 05:20:38 AM
Bloodworth, I wouldn't sweat the extra ram too much, either. Folks are all agog over shittons of ram, but I have yet to throw anything at my PC that's needed more than 4.

I do a lot of 3d + Photoshop layers (Non-destructive editing) work, so it helps a great deal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 13, 2010, 07:40:25 AM
Oh, well, yep, there is that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 13, 2010, 07:47:54 AM
It also makes games awesome.   :grin: Correct key or not, Lightwave 9.6 SCREAMS in 64 bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 13, 2010, 11:43:04 AM
It also makes games awesome.   :grin: Correct key or not, Lightwave 9.6 SCREAMS in 64 bit.
There's only a handful of PC games that are 64-bit -- i.e. that can take advantage of more than 2 GB of RAM.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 14, 2010, 09:23:12 AM
It also makes games awesome.   :grin: Correct key or not, Lightwave 9.6 SCREAMS in 64 bit.
There's only a handful of PC games that are 64-bit -- i.e. that can take advantage of more than 2 GB of RAM.

Much like multiple cores, can't the OS take advantage of it though?  For example if you are on a multiple core machine with 4 gigs of ram, won't a 64bit OS be able to dedicate a relatively unused core and a full 2 gigs of RAM to your 32 bit game?

edit: for spelling and clarity.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 14, 2010, 10:20:07 AM
It also makes games awesome.   :grin: Correct key or not, Lightwave 9.6 SCREAMS in 64 bit.
There's only a handful of PC games that are 64-bit -- i.e. that can take advantage of more than 2 GB of RAM.

Much like multiple cores, can't the OS take advantage of it though?  For example if you are on a multiple core machine with 4 gigs of ram, won't a 64bit OS be able to dedicate a relatively unused core and a full 2 gigs of RAM to your 32 bit game?

edit: for spelling and clarity.
Yes but unless you are playing, say, multiple City of Heroes accounts at the same time on the same box, it's not likely you are going to be running multiple 3D games (the biggest memory hogs) at the same time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 14, 2010, 11:28:23 AM
Anyone have a list of 64-bit games? I think HL2 is. I googled it! And I found a cool mod for HL2 http://www.cinematicmod.com/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 14, 2010, 05:38:47 PM
Do you have a convention cooling system you can install to test this out?

Just as a follow up...

Took off the water cooler, put on a Cooler Master Hyper 212.  So far, a day and a half without any freezing.  Which is a relief that nothing else was wrong, but bummed that I have to replace it.  Maybe in a few months I'll get another one, but for now I'm just going to go back to traditional cooling.  It's amazing how quiet it was, and how loud my machine sounds now.

Just froze.

Goddamn it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 14, 2010, 09:40:47 PM
Have you tried to run the windows memory test at startup?

Could have a stick of RAM that went bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 15, 2010, 06:26:03 AM
It also makes games awesome.   :grin: Correct key or not, Lightwave 9.6 SCREAMS in 64 bit.
There's only a handful of PC games that are 64-bit -- i.e. that can take advantage of more than 2 GB of RAM.

Much like multiple cores, can't the OS take advantage of it though?  For example if you are on a multiple core machine with 4 gigs of ram, won't a 64bit OS be able to dedicate a relatively unused core and a full 2 gigs of RAM to your 32 bit game?

edit: for spelling and clarity.
Yes but unless you are playing, say, multiple City of Heroes accounts at the same time on the same box, it's not likely you are going to be running multiple 3D games (the biggest memory hogs) at the same time.


Well, i know for a fact that APB runs in 32 bit mode, however its able to address all the ram you throw at it on a 64 bit system. How? I dunno, magic?

Anyway, I mostly did it so I can avoid slowdowns with my art tools. I have never been one to keep unnecessary things open, but now I can worry about it less, also, photoshop is a bitch when you are working with files in the 200 mb range (not saved size, but active file memory size).

And ram is cheap.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 15, 2010, 07:06:54 AM
Have you tried to run the windows memory test at startup?

Could have a stick of RAM that went bad.

Yeah, comes up fine using both the windows memory test and memtest.  I've tried one/either/both sticks.  Same result.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 15, 2010, 07:12:54 AM
Can you check to see if your BIOS has a built in volt meter for the 3, 5, and 12 volt rails? Maybe post the readings here? A certain degree of fluctuation is normal, but over a certain amount is considered sing of a failing PSU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 15, 2010, 10:14:18 AM
I'll check it when I get home and let you know


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on July 15, 2010, 11:23:58 PM
I'm guessing motherboard, if you're not getting beep codes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 18, 2010, 10:26:08 AM
So repartition, reformat (full) and reinstall XP, forgot to backup 1 directory with some photo's in it.  I realize that if any portion of the disk that contained a file has been overwritten with something else there is nothing that can be done but since the new install is smaller than the old install and the image folder in question was somewhat recent this may be unlikely...

Currently looking at:
http://www.easeus-photorecovery.com/

Any thoughts or suggestions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 18, 2010, 02:04:19 PM
As long as things haven't over-written it, any data recovery tool should work.  If possible, download it on another disk and install it on a CD.  (The chance is small, but having the data recovery program sitting on the sectors of your data is the height of painful irony.)

It's old now, and can be clunky, but the program I last used successfully was: Drive Rescue (http://www.canadiancontent.net/tech/download/Drive_Rescue.html).  I'm not sure what's the most current, unfortunately.  (Or maybe fortunately for myself...)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 19, 2010, 05:02:47 PM
Suggestions on a free/CHEAP registry cleaner for someone who doesn't want to get into the weeds of their registry?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 19, 2010, 06:38:42 PM
FDISK


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 19, 2010, 08:04:44 PM
Ccleaner. Allows you to make a backup before you erase the invalid entries, in case you need to roll back your changes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 21, 2010, 08:28:37 AM
Can you check to see if your BIOS has a built in volt meter for the 3, 5, and 12 volt rails? Maybe post the readings here? A certain degree of fluctuation is normal, but over a certain amount is considered sing of a failing PSU.

After finally getting a response from MSI, I've got to RMA the board.  Not entirely happy with being without my gaming rig for a week or two, but better than having to buy a new mobo.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 22, 2010, 10:18:54 AM
Ok, I'm having some intermittent networking issues.

Network goes down (can't connect to the internet).  I have to unplug the cable modem, unplug the router and replug everything back in.  Then it usually comes back online.   This last time it took a while for me to get everything working again.

This happens perhaps 3-5 times a week and can be annoying when it kicks me out of a game or interrupts work.  Could my router be starting to fail or is it just Comcast? I don't think it's interference since both the wireless and wired connections go down.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 22, 2010, 10:31:18 AM
Do you have another computer to see if the connection is computer specific? You didn't clarify if the wireless/wired connection are on the same machine or not.

Routers -rarely- break. You may want to do a factory reset, and if that doesn't work, see if there's an available firmware update, but proceed with caution, since there may be comcast user account settings that need to be reentered after a reset.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 22, 2010, 10:37:39 AM
I have my home PC sitting right next to my work laptop.  First is wired, second is wireless.

Just curious because this is happening a lot lately when previous connection interruptions would only happen very infrequently (maybe once every few months).   

The light for "Activity" is usually solid when this happens.  I've been lazy a few times and a reset of the router has solved it on it's own without having to go to the standard Comcast way of fixing your connection (modem and router off, plug in modem, wait, plug in router).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 22, 2010, 10:40:40 AM
Hmm. Next time it happens, just plug in the computer straight into the comcast modem and see if you're still blocked. If you are, well, then its not the router, but something wonky with the comcast modem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 23, 2010, 05:37:18 AM
Have you changed the default username/password on your router? There are a couple of DNS poisoning viruses now that specifially target consumer grade routers that use default username/pw strings to access them and then load into memory.

If you are having to reboot your modem, it may be a dying modem (if you lease the modem from Comcast their techs will replace it if you get a service call even if it is not the issue) or your modem is not getting good enough signal. I would call Comcast when it stops working and let them take a look at their CMTS to determine if your modem is having connection issues.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 28, 2010, 07:50:00 PM
Odd question...

I've been using an ethernet cable that is about 10 inches long between my modem and router.  I heard/read something somewhere today that said that the signal might be too strong, and it's hurting my connection speed/ping.  Is that possible?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 28, 2010, 07:55:30 PM
Sounds like BS to me.  I seriously doubt the specifications for transmit and receive for those ports would require the minuscule amount of resistance provided by an extra foot of cable to avoid damage.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 28, 2010, 08:21:00 PM
Odd question...

I've been using an ethernet cable that is about 10 inches long between my modem and router.  I heard/read something somewhere today that said that the signal might be too strong, and it's hurting my connection speed/ping.  Is that possible?

That is total BS.

You can have too hot a signal on wireless which can cause drops and retransmits if your computer is too close to an AP that is screaming, but ethernet does not have that issue.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on July 28, 2010, 08:22:12 PM
Thanks.  I thought it was a crazy, bullshit statement but wanted to be sure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on July 29, 2010, 05:59:53 AM
Thanks.  I thought it was a crazy, bullshit statement but wanted to be sure.

Ethernet uses differential signaling which pretty much negates signal noise.  Basically, the signal is transmitted on two wires with one being the exact inverse of the other.  You raise the signal on wire A and the receiver lowers the signal on wire B, since this is proportional the the difference is always maintained at spec.  Effectively this means that difference between high (1) and low (0) is always maintained.  Shortness of the cable isn't really an issue.  Once you get over a certain length the signal does start to attenuate and the reflection of the signal from the terminus (it bounces back and forth on the line at a weaker strength but eventually that's strong enough) can cause the signal to be indistinct but that's at like 120 meters or so (depending on cable spec).

If one side were transmitting out of spec (over 3.5 mA I think for ethernet) then you could burn out the receiver but, uh, not likely.   If the transmitter were too weak you would actually want a shorter wire as a longer one would cause more attenuation of the signal.

TLDR, on a short wire the if there is no fire the signal should be clear.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on July 30, 2010, 09:31:21 AM
I'm having problem connecting to my college's VPN at home. I'm pretty sure it's a router/ISP issue as it's worked on and off before. Anybody have experience with these sort of issues?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 30, 2010, 10:05:22 AM
PS3 died, "yellow light of death" issue.  Currently I am only really interested in getting my saves off of the hard disk, which you need the matching PS3 to do.  I don't find anything in a quick search about being able to read a PS3 disk with any other device/PC, so my only recourse seems to be to manage to get my PS3 to power on for at least an hour so I can make a new backup.  Anyone have any tips?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 30, 2010, 01:14:40 PM
I'm having problem connecting to my college's VPN at home. I'm pretty sure it's a router/ISP issue as it's worked on and off before. Anybody have experience with these sort of issues?

We've recently had problems with our VPN's connectivity with faculty/staff that are on comcast or another ISP who's connectivity speed fluctuates depending on the traffic at their local hub. It didn't happen in the past, but we've gotten complaints recently. It doesn't seem to affect people on DSL or other services where there's a 'guaranteed' speed connection.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 03, 2010, 02:12:38 AM
Windows 7 question (maybe this was in Vista too, never used it):

So I've got a bunch of Windows Explorer windows open since I'm managing a bunch of files and I decide to drag one of those windows somewhere so I can reveal/see some stuff in another window and Windows fucking decides that what I really wanted to do in addition to dragging that one window is fucking minimize all the other Explorer windows. So now I have to figure out all the fucking Explorer windows I had open and bring those up one by one and pray to Ballmer that dragging another window doesn't fucking minimize all the other windows again.

How do I turn off that "feature"?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 03, 2010, 08:24:05 AM
Well, there's the 'show desktop' thingie on the bottom right (in XP and vista, it was on the left side quicklaunch bar). Did you accidentally hit that? Cuz I have been using 7 for a while now and I haven't ever had all explorer windows minimize just from moving one of them. I'm not saying you must be wrong, but I'm wondering if there's some feature enabled in, for example, the 'Personalize' control panel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 03, 2010, 10:53:26 AM
Well, there's the 'show desktop' thingie on the bottom right (in XP and vista, it was on the left side quicklaunch bar). Did you accidentally hit that?
Nope. I think it's part of the same feature where if you "push" a window against the top of the screen it'll maximize the window for you or if you push it to one of the corners it'll resize the window to "portrait" mode so you can have side-by-side windows.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 03, 2010, 11:33:32 AM
I was not able to immediately duplicate the issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 03, 2010, 12:45:21 PM
You people are useless! Useless I say!

Video showing "feature" (sorry about the large file size): Stupid Windows 7 Tricks (http://pandadesigns.com/f13/stupid_windows_7_tricks.mpg)

This behavior happens with other types of windows as well (e.g. Firefox) not just Windows Explorer it's just with Explorer I usually have more windows of that type open so it happens more often with those. I don't know how to trigger the "minimize all other windows of that type" "feature" on demand, as you can see in the video, as I just randomly move things around until it happens but for me it happens *a lot*, hence my original post.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on August 03, 2010, 12:51:59 PM
If you click on the top of the window and shake it it minimises everything else. I just tested it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on August 03, 2010, 12:54:36 PM
Your video doesn't want to play for me, but it sounds like you're talking about the "shake" feature where if you take a window and "shake" it other windows minimize. You can disable it using the group policy editor:

From a command prompt, run gpedit.msc
Go to user config->administrative templates->desktop
set "turn off Aero shake window..." to enabled

You can do it with a registry hack as well but it involved adding new keys and such, easier to just use gpedit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 03, 2010, 01:10:37 PM
Your video doesn't want to play for me, but it sounds like you're talking about the "shake" feature where if you take a window and "shake" it other windows minimize. You can disable it using the group policy editor:

From a command prompt, run gpedit.msc
Go to user config->administrative templates->desktop
set "turn off Aero shake window..." to enabled

You can do it with a registry hack as well but it involved adding new keys and such, easier to just use gpedit.
Thank you! You people aren't useless after all :awesome_for_real:

And fuck MS for burying that setting.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 03, 2010, 08:52:10 PM
Thank you! You people aren't useless after all :awesome_for_real:

And fuck MS for burying that setting.

Stop shaking your fucking windows! Dumbass!

 :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 03, 2010, 09:18:54 PM
My poor mouse hand is crippled thanks to years of, uh, mousing. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on August 04, 2010, 05:53:13 AM
Well, now we all know that Trippy mouses spastically.   :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on August 08, 2010, 05:56:36 PM
I want to send my Dad a couple of videos on a DVD -- what's the most common format(s) an industry standard, non-Blueray player might read?  For example, mpg4, avi, what?  I've burnt the files as a "data" DVD, so there's no homemade intro etc.  Thank ye.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 08, 2010, 06:07:07 PM
I want to send my Dad a couple of videos on a DVD -- what's the most common format(s) an industry standard, non-Blueray player might read?  For example, mpg4, avi, what?  I've burnt the files as a "data" DVD, so there's no homemade intro etc.  Thank ye.

The only video format that you can be guaranteed will work on any DVD player is MPEG2, as that is the encoding used in the DVD video standard. A lot of players started supporting WMV and Divx encoded AVI files several years ago, but I would not say that you are guaranteed it will work without knowing what formats the player supports.

You may also want to make sure you burn it as a video disc and not a data disc as older players may not be able to view the videos if they do not see a file structure they recognize.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on August 09, 2010, 09:42:25 AM
good advice and info, thanks


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on August 16, 2010, 09:04:47 AM
If I'm going with an I7 for a new build should I go with LGA 1366 or 1165 socket? Is one going to be around longer than the other?

Also, I see three different DDR3 1300 memory standards. 10600, 10666 and one other I can't remember. Difference?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 16, 2010, 09:23:06 AM
Anecdotally I hear the 1366 is going to be around longer, but remember, this is Intel. They up and switch socket types at the drop of a hat.

As to memory standards, well, check your motherboard to see what's supported, but essentially the difference is speed. You do have to be careful, since a board will advertise that it clocks the memory at this super speed, you get the memory for it, and it doesn't do it well.

Bottom line is you should visit the motherboard's website and see their list of approved memory types/brands and buy those and those only.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on August 16, 2010, 09:59:24 AM
I was looking at the specs for the motherboard and all it says is DDR3 1333 but it looks like there is a few different speeds? I was looking at MSI's site for the list of memory but it lists model numbers and I can never find the exact model numbers since I think they vary all the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 16, 2010, 10:32:41 AM
DDR 1333 is a pretty standard memory speed, so I'd just go for a reputable brand (crucial, corsair, kingston) at that speed. You should be fine. You get into trouble if you go for the custom speed low latency 'configure your motherboard to use this uber memory' type of module, such as the Corsair XMS (extreme memory speed) line.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 17, 2010, 07:11:35 AM
Bottom line is you should visit the motherboard's website and see their list of approved memory types/brands and buy those and those only.
Crucial's memory configurator is pretty good, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on August 17, 2010, 10:06:35 AM
In Excel/Openoffice anyone know how to set the line widths of a line graph automatically (or all at the same time) to a smaller value? Having to try and click each data series and change it seperately is completely out of the question for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 21, 2010, 09:52:52 AM
I was copying some stuff onto Data DVDs this morning when I ran into a problem.  The first two worked out just fine but then I failed several  times in a row. I'm using Nero Express to burn the DVD and the write succeeds but then it fails about 10 percent of the way into the verification stage where it reads back all of the data.

I tried burning the same data with two other utilities and it always fails reading it at about the same spot. I'm guessing that something has gone wrong with the writer part of the DVD player as it reads other DVDs with no problem.

Is there any point to trying one of those DVD cleaner discs or should I just blow 30 bucks and get a new DVD burner?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 21, 2010, 10:48:54 AM
Have you tried burning it at a slower rate? Also, is it the same data that you're copying? Is there a chance that there's some corruption on the source files themselves?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 21, 2010, 11:01:44 AM
I haven't tried a slower rate but I did try burning different data with the same result. I tried burning with Nero, Alcohol-120 and with the standard Windows Vista utility software and all three failed in the same way. ie. The write says it succeeds but you can't fully read the disk afterwards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 21, 2010, 11:08:30 AM
Try a slower burn rate. Sometimes the drives really don't operate at top speed as advertised.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on August 21, 2010, 11:22:41 AM
Try a slower burn rate. Sometimes the drives really don't operate at top speed as advertised.

Or, try different media.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 21, 2010, 01:01:47 PM
I tried burning at 4x rather than 8x and things improved a lot. It made it almost to the end before reads started failing. Then when I tried again at 2x I discovered that 4x is as slow as my DVD writer is willing to go.

I think I'll just get a new one.  The DVDs I'm using aren't top of the line by any means but they're a package of 25 and the first 15 worked just fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 21, 2010, 11:26:31 PM
Ya, time to pick up a new one. Sorry. I guess you could try using a Linux OS to burn a disk, to see if its the DVD or the driver, but I suspect the hardware itself has gone bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on August 21, 2010, 11:33:52 PM
In Excel/Openoffice anyone know how to set the line widths of a line graph automatically (or all at the same time) to a smaller value? Having to try and click each data series and change it seperately is completely out of the question for me.

Either my google-fu has failed me or the only way to do this is to create a graph with 255 series, all at the line width you want and save it as the default template.

My question, what kind of temps should my GTX260 run at? I noticed a lot of heat coming out of the back of the PC the other day when I'd left WoW on the character selection screen for a while. Checked out the temps and the card is idling at 60oC and under load goes over 90oC very quickly.

Since then I've been running EVGA's Precision tool and manually ramping up the fan speed to 70% or more which keeps it at 60-70oC under load but is noisy as fuck. Auto fan control means the fan is always at 40%, whatever the temp, which is clearly inadequate.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 22, 2010, 08:32:27 AM
That sounds about right with the crappy factory coolers they're putting out there. Its nearly as if they want your card to burn out! Your card is probably safe-ish till its hitting the 100 C mark. Then again that's getting so hot its probably endangering the lifespan of other components in your box.

Get after market factory cooling for the vid card. I know, it sounds super nerdy over clocker l33t kiddy stuff, but even a simple kind of VGA cooler, not one of these 2 inch thick monstrosities, can drop the temps well below the temps you're citing.

I had a 8800 GT that ran to the mid to high 90s then I put in a childishly simple Zalman fan and the temps dropped to a playable 65C under load.

Another thought is to see what your ventilation is inside the case. Rising temps that can't get out will contribute significantly to an overheated VGA.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on August 22, 2010, 09:31:03 AM
Either my google-fu has failed me or the only way to do this is to create a graph with 255 series, all at the line width you want and save it as the default template.

That's what I've done. Though I used 10 as I don't have anything that requires 255. I think you might be able to do it with VBA macros. This is the sort of shit why Excel is such a pain in the ass. A simple thing like line widths makes it practically completely unusable for scientific work  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on August 22, 2010, 09:46:40 AM
Thanks Engels. The case airflow is excellent, it's a HAF and the mobo & CPU temps always stay very low. For now I'm just sticking with manually cranking the fans up when gaming. I'll look into aftermarket coolers though.

Moses, yeah, Excel sucks wet farts out of dead pigeons for scientific graphs. Prism or SigmaPlot are far better, but not exactly user friendly  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 23, 2010, 12:20:55 PM
I tried burning at 4x rather than 8x and things improved a lot. It made it almost to the end before reads started failing. Then when I tried again at 2x I discovered that 4x is as slow as my DVD writer is willing to go.

I think I'll just get a new one.  The DVDs I'm using aren't top of the line by any means but they're a package of 25 and the first 15 worked just fine.

On cheap media, QA/QC can be bad enough that a single pack will have random good ones and random bad ones. Using different/higher quality media may fix your issue.

Also, is the drive you are using as a scratch drive (where the app writes before putting to disc) near full or heavily fragmented? That sometimes can cause random errors with copying.

Of course, you can buy a decent quality DVD writer for less than 40 bucks now so it might just be as easy to replace the drive and see if that fixes it.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 24, 2010, 05:58:16 AM
Well I've wasted so many blank DVDs that I need to buy some more anyway. Maybe I'll buy a name brand and see if that fixes it.  It'll only cost me one disk to find out I guess.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on August 31, 2010, 05:17:01 AM
By the sounds of it my HD isn't going to last much longer (gone from quiet to making incredible amounts of noise on read/write). So, is it worth it to get an SSD or should I make an effort to wait for better/cheaper ones?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on August 31, 2010, 06:46:36 PM
Anyone know how to make mysqldmp return a success/fail code into a text file or something? This would be in Windows. (Install Linux problem solved, I know).

I am cobbling together a really shitty email notification thing for a backup batch job on a Wordpress server but I can't figure out how to make it aware of whether the job succeeded or not when it sends the email, so it is a little shittier than I would like at the moment.

(Probably totally the wrong forum but it seemed like way too unfun a question for Useless Conversation.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 31, 2010, 06:50:07 PM
By the sounds of it my HD isn't going to last much longer (gone from quiet to making incredible amounts of noise on read/write). So, is it worth it to get an SSD or should I make an effort to wait for better/cheaper ones?

I would hold off until the new Intel drives hit, they are pretty much doubling the storage on everything and the spiel is price won't be doubling along with that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 31, 2010, 06:54:05 PM
Anyone know how to make mysqldmp return a success/fail code into a text file or something? This would be in Windows. (Install Linux problem solved, I know).

I am cobbling together a really shitty email notification thing for a backup batch job on a Wordpress server but I can't figure out how to make it aware of whether the job succeeded or not when it sends the email, so it is a little shittier than I would like at the moment.

(Probably totally the wrong forum but it seemed like way too unfun a question for Useless Conversation.)

I have not used mysqldmp but if you are using windows task scheduler you can create a batch file to call the exe and pipe the output to a text file, iirc something like:

somecommand.exe > results.txt


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on August 31, 2010, 07:15:28 PM
I actually found a flag to dump errors/warnings to a file, I must have looked through that list 5 times before I saw it.  :argh:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on September 01, 2010, 08:12:13 AM
Alt-tab freezing issues. Basically, when I open Team Speak, Warhammer, or League of Legends and try to alt tab into or out of any of them my comp freezes for 10-20 seconds. Any other game (EvE, Mass Effect 2, DA:O, SC2, etc) are fine. I've tried completely removing and then updating my GPU drivers with no good results. I've run a defrag (which is done once a week anyways as a scheduled maintenance event) since Team Speak, Warhammer, and LoL were the last 3 things installed on my computer (EvE right before TS, then TS, WAR, and then LoL) and this started after installing TS. After those 3 were installed, I still had about 80 gigs free out of ~475gb. I've since uninstalled TS and LoL with no effect and will be uninstalling WAR and EvE to try that out as well.

Anyone have any other ideas as to what may be causing this? There is another issue where if I hit esc while in LoL I would get the same freeze as I did when I alt tabbed, which I figured was due to LoL probably being coded to have the menu work with the client while the game was separate, probably wrong but it was my initial thought.

Basic System Rundown (I really should upload a DxDiag somewhere for times like this):
Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L mobo
Intel e8400 cpu
4gig pc6400 DDR2 Kingston HyperX
Asus Ati HD4870 gpu

I can run any other tests/diagnosis programs when I get home if needed, as well as post a real DxDiag. For now, I figured it would be good to get some ideas to test out when I get home tonight.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 01, 2010, 08:49:59 AM
How about the sound driver? A driver hang with TS suggests a sound issue. On-board sound, or dedicated?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on September 01, 2010, 08:51:57 AM
On board sound and definitely a good thought that I'll try updating tonight since I didn't update that recently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 01, 2010, 10:56:21 AM
I actually found a flag to dump errors/warnings to a file, I must have looked through that list 5 times before I saw it.  :argh:
I figured you had already looked through that list and found it didn't do what you needed.  Otherwise I would have suggested it.  :oops:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on September 01, 2010, 05:35:11 PM
How about the sound driver? A driver hang with TS suggests a sound issue. On-board sound, or dedicated?

Wasn't the sound driver. I've tried a couple versions of the drivers, including the stock one, and no change. I've uninstalled all Logitech devices (read of other people having the same issue and some were solved by uninstalling Logitech items) but that didn't work. So I'm still lost and going to uninstall all programs installed around the time TS was and reinstall them as perhaps with all this stuff uninstalled a setting I'm not seeing may be different.

Any other ideas are welcome before I end up format/reinstall which I'd prefer not to do.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on September 01, 2010, 06:31:51 PM
By the sounds of it my HD isn't going to last much longer (gone from quiet to making incredible amounts of noise on read/write). So, is it worth it to get an SSD or should I make an effort to wait for better/cheaper ones?

PMR (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular_recording) is hot shit, so depending on how old your drive is  and who made it you might get a pretty hefty speed boost.

Really, it depends on whether you can wait, and whether you would like a hefty storage volume if you ever decide to jump to SSD.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 01, 2010, 06:38:34 PM
I think at any given time I only have 100GB of data on my drive, so I'm not in need of 200+ GB of space.

Wasn't the sound driver. I've tried a couple versions of the drivers, including the stock one, and no change. I've uninstalled all Logitech devices (read of other people having the same issue and some were solved by uninstalling Logitech items) but that didn't work. So I'm still lost and going to uninstall all programs installed around the time TS was and reinstall them as perhaps with all this stuff uninstalled a setting I'm not seeing may be different.

Any other ideas are welcome before I end up format/reinstall which I'd prefer not to do.

Hardware acceleration? Sometimes that causes issues.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on September 01, 2010, 08:12:34 PM
Hardware acceleration? Sometimes that causes issues.

Nope, it was something really stupid that I found out tonight. Somewhere along the line TeamSpeak and PowerDVD didn't play nice. Uninstalling both of them got rid of the hang on my system and now it's working great again.

Thanks for the input people, case closed now, woot!  :rock:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 01, 2010, 09:26:52 PM
Good to hear. You know how PowerDVD installs some crap that runs at startup that's 100% unnecessary. I bet you can install PowerDVD again and then edit either the registery (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run in 32 bit, HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run in 64 bit or something like that) or use msconfig to disable the item at startup. Or I think Windows Defender, if you're using it, allows you to remove startup programs too.

Edit: btw, if you aren't familiar with registry fiddling, use msconfig, its safer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 01, 2010, 11:53:00 PM
Can anyone recommend a good (also simple and free) file sync app for Win7 64? I've installed SyncToys 2.1 and started it running my photos backup, which is 150Gb, 20,000 files from local hdd to NAS. It's now been running for 8 hours and is about 5% done, which seems ludicrously slow. I could just manually copy the entire directory a lot faster.

Edit: It's ok, answered my own question. FreeFileSync (http://sourceforge.net/projects/freefilesync/) has just done the same job in 5 minutes. Hurrah.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Segoris on September 02, 2010, 08:55:47 AM
Good to hear. You know how PowerDVD installs some crap that runs at startup that's 100% unnecessary. I bet you can install PowerDVD again and then edit either the registery (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run in 32 bit, HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run in 64 bit or something like that) or use msconfig to disable the item at startup. Or I think Windows Defender, if you're using it, allows you to remove startup programs too.

Edit: btw, if you aren't familiar with registry fiddling, use msconfig, its safer.

Good thought, though I'll probably just leave it uninstalled for now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 02, 2010, 08:59:33 PM
Can anyone recommend a good (also simple and free) file sync app for Win7 64? I've installed SyncToys 2.1 and started it running my photos backup, which is 150Gb, 20,000 files from local hdd to NAS. It's now been running for 8 hours and is about 5% done, which seems ludicrously slow. I could just manually copy the entire directory a lot faster.

Edit: It's ok, answered my own question. FreeFileSync (http://sourceforge.net/projects/freefilesync/) has just done the same job in 5 minutes. Hurrah.

That's kinda weird, because maybe I'm misinformed, but SyncToy is meant to simply be a gui for simple robocopy commands, which are as basic as you get. Then again, leave it to Windows to not manage a simple file comparison effectively.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 02, 2010, 11:10:50 PM
A bit of googling turned up a bunch of other people having the same problem with SyncToy since it went to version 2 or something. Microsoft support guys posting to update to 2.1 to fix these problems and said people responding that makes no difference and that's as far as the discussions seem to go.

So, if you use SyncToy stick with 1.4 would appear to be the advice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 03, 2010, 02:52:43 AM
Ah, me again!

Anyone know how I can make the Google search built into Firefox default to .co.uk instead of .com? I've made sure my google account knows I'm in the UK, I've searched for google.co.uk search engine plugins, all failed.

My google-fu is *really* failing me!   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 03, 2010, 03:22:17 AM
Ah, me again!

Anyone know how I can make the Google search built into Firefox default to .co.uk instead of .com? I've made sure my google account knows I'm in the UK, I've searched for google.co.uk search engine plugins, all failed.

My google-fu is *really* failing me!   :oh_i_see:

Google returns search results based on the geo-location of your IP address. So you may be SOL if the IP address your ISP gives you is not in google's geo-location DB as being in the UK.

Actually.....looks like you can get a plugin that uses the .uk page: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/13514


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 06, 2010, 05:49:16 AM
Thanks Chimpy, that addon works great.

It's a weird problem though because as you say, it should send me to google.co.uk automatically. And in fact every other PC in the house does so, just not this one. I'm wondering if there's some odd IP address shenanigans going on with my router...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 06, 2010, 06:28:32 AM
If all of your computers are coming from behind the same NAT that would not make sense.

Is your computer set to send web traffic through a proxy that is not geolocated to the UK or are you always connected to a VPN on that machine?

That is the only thing that I can think of that might cause one machine behind the same home router to be geolocating differently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 06, 2010, 11:00:47 AM
All going through the same NAT. It makes no sense at all. But it doesn't matter now, Chimpy gave me a workaround  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on September 10, 2010, 08:04:29 PM
I'm thinking of switching to AT&T U Verse.  Pleased to hear experiences, good and bad.  What questions should I ask with regards to download speeds to determine if it is better/worse than my current Comcast 16Mbps service?  FWIW, I have the the option to getting their 18Mbps or 24Mbps DSL service.  I think pretty much everybody on my street/neighborhood has Comcast...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 10, 2010, 09:39:38 PM
As with any copper loop product, your speeds will be heavily determined by your distance and the quality of the line to the DSLAM in your node. Whatever your speed gets will not be affected by how much your neighbors use it like cable, but AT&T does dynamically adjust the available bandwidth for internet to ensure that you have proper HDTV service if you are watching something on the TV at the same time.

AT&T you will have as shitty (if not shittier) customer service than Comcast so that is always something to keep in mind.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: birdsguts on September 10, 2010, 10:16:19 PM
We have U-verse and their fastest package.
I hate it. But then again my situation might be caused by the total package that we have.
I think the big issue is that my roommates are always recording on the tv and it is scaling the bandwidth (didn't think of this until I read the above post) and pinching off whatever I'm doing on the computer all the time. So I guess if you aren't recording alot of tv or using that service for cable at all it might be pretty decent, but as it is for our package the thing drives me crazy. Way too unreliable to really enjoy gaming right now. One of the things I'm trying to solve. I need to remember to call them about opening up some bandwidth or something. I dunno.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 10, 2010, 10:26:48 PM
I could have sworn that AT&T wasn't going to QoS the internet down to unusable for relatively low bandwidth applications like gaming or VoIP. Sounds like you may have some other problems as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on September 10, 2010, 10:38:41 PM
I'll be keeping my TV through Comcast, and just switching internet providers, so no worries about that.

I guess, all things being equal, will I see consistently higher speeds with 18Mbps DSL versus 16Mbps cable if a) I am reasonably close to the hub, b) the majority of my neighborhood is cable internet, and c) copper wiring currently in the house is less than 10 years old (or even brand new with a direct from the outside junction box to the outlet in my home office)?  If so, how much appreciably higher will it be?  I know the answer is mostly guestimation on anyones part, but I am interested in opinions on it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 11, 2010, 12:03:31 AM
I'll be keeping my TV through Comcast, and just switching internet providers, so no worries about that.

I guess, all things being equal, will I see consistently higher speeds with 18Mbps DSL versus 16Mbps cable if a) I am reasonably close to the hub, b) the majority of my neighborhood is cable internet, and c) copper wiring currently in the house is less than 10 years old (or even brand new with a direct from the outside junction box to the outlet in my home office)?  If so, how much appreciably higher will it be?  I know the answer is mostly guestimation on anyones part, but I am interested in opinions on it.

U-Verse upstream speeds even on their highest tier internet will be lower than your Comcast cable modem.

The thing I have heard from all former Comcast customers that went to U-Verse is that the TV is actually the reason to switch as they say TV is a lot better, especially the DVR they give you.

You are also going to pay a premium for not having a bundle with AT&T just like you would with Comcast.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 11, 2010, 06:45:43 AM
I could have sworn that AT&T wasn't going to QoS the internet down to unusable for relatively low bandwidth applications like gaming or VoIP. Sounds like you may have some other problems as well.
All the internet companies do it.  Watching HighDef kills a bunch of the bandwidth, so if you try to record a show, watch a show, and do internet the connection is going to suffer.  Depending on distance to the office in the case of DSL, there may just not be that much bandwidth available.  Cable has the timing issue since it depends on the local loop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: caladein on September 22, 2010, 08:33:50 PM
One of our old-ish CRT televisions started displaying a blank screen and emitting a buzzing noise.

Now usually that would lead me call it dead and leave it at that but the on-screen display (channel number, volume display, etc.) and audio work just fine.  At this point, I'm not finding reports of similar symptoms via searches so uh... help.

I'll be leaving it unplugged overnight at the very least to see if that does anything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 23, 2010, 05:52:06 AM
If the OSD works then I'd guess it was the tuner that was fucked. I'm totally making this up as I go along, but surely the OSD uses the CRT and steering coils to display information, so all of that must be working yeah?

What happens if you play an external source, like a DVD player, through it?

On another note, why do routers break? My ADSL modem/router has started dying - frequent connection dropouts, especially when someone rings the landline, which means it's a sensitivity issue with the ADSL modem yeah? I've changed the microfilters but no dice. I'm having to reboot it once or twice a day at the moment, which is a PITA.

Odd thing is that this is the 2nd ADSL modem/router I've had die in 12 months. My previous one worked perfectly for 5 years and then just went this way suddenly, but this one is only about 9 months old and is doing the same.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 23, 2010, 09:08:51 AM
I started having DSL disconnects a while back.  Replaced the modem, no joy.  Eventually the tech moved my pair to another cabinet and, minus taking WAY too long to provision me, works fantastically now.  So, might not be the modem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 23, 2010, 09:19:18 AM
Eventually the tech moved my pair to another cabinet

...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: caladein on September 23, 2010, 10:14:38 AM
If the OSD works then I'd guess it was the tuner that was fucked. I'm totally making this up as I go along, but surely the OSD uses the CRT and steering coils to display information, so all of that must be working yeah?

What happens if you play an external source, like a DVD player, through it?

Yeah, trying the DVD player and getting the same issue is what lead me to rule out the DTV tuner.  Not really sure what it was, but leaving it unplugged overnight appears to have fixed it for now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 23, 2010, 11:40:36 AM
I started having DSL disconnects a while back.  Replaced the modem, no joy.  Eventually the tech moved my pair to another cabinet and, minus taking WAY too long to provision me, works fantastically now.  So, might not be the modem.

Hmm, long wait time in telephone queue to have chat with ISP tomorrow then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 24, 2010, 08:55:06 AM
On another note, why do routers break? My ADSL modem/router has started dying - frequent connection dropouts, especially when someone rings the landline, which means it's a sensitivity issue with the ADSL modem yeah? I've changed the microfilters but no dice. I'm having to reboot it once or twice a day at the moment, which is a PITA.
It could be for any number of reasons.  Most commonly, cheap soldering or components, causing them to wear out with just being on.  (Leaky transistors, heat eroding components, etc.)  If it's a router with software, then it could be a degradation in memory chips, or full logs, or a software state entered that wasn't accounted for.

Often it's external as Yeg mentions though.  One bad connection to one wire you've got problems.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 24, 2010, 09:33:24 AM
Combo ADSL modems/routers are more prone to failure for weird reasons than a purely modem + external router.

I think a lot of it has to do with heat. All that circuitry packed in a small package, and I have found that ADSL modems for whatever reason generate a lot more heat than other network devices. Not sure exactly why, but I never had a cable modem that heated up as much as my DSL modems have.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 24, 2010, 12:47:06 PM
Hmm, so would I be better off getting a seperate modem & router? That sounds like more things for me to fuck up...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 24, 2010, 07:28:18 PM
I'll say that you will have more flexibility if you put a router behind your modem and stick the router in the DMZ, but also you will have to learn things.  The separate router will be more reliable and probably faster, but that's less important if you're not transferring a lot on your LAN.  Also if you are like me you might forget which IP ranges you set and various other tidbits and have to get angry at yourself when you rebuild your WAN/LAN incorrectly a few times. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 25, 2010, 01:14:18 AM
Hmm that does sound like stuff I would be very good at fucking up. I'll get round to calling the ISP one day next week and see if they can drop me down to ADSL1 instead of 2 and see if that stabilises things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 27, 2010, 07:46:37 AM
I love ISPs. I've been getting intermittent 20% packet loss. An hour will be lossy, then a fine for a while, then lossy again. I've unplugged the cable box to exclude dual HD recording as a suspect. I'm thinking it's either a faulty piece of equipment on a pole (read: fixed when hell freezes) or a neighbor has suddenly begun hogging the shit out of the bandwidth, though I should'nt really be getting loss under that scenario, eh?

Been a couple weeks now, I'm starting to get pissed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 27, 2010, 08:26:03 AM
Is it packet loss to your default gateway, or just to sites around the internet?

I know I had issues with Comcast years ago where they had a bad router at the point it left their network but everything to the CMTS was fine. If you have a neighbor who is on the same Upstream channel on the CMTS as you who is upstream torrenting a storm, it is possible you would see issues as the upstream channel you are on will have a maximum total throughput of ~ 32Mb/s if you are on a DOCSIS 2 plant (though it might be lower depending on configuration).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 27, 2010, 09:00:55 AM
Good idea, I'll ping that tonight and see what I see. My usual ping target is www.apple.com (har) as a constant because I know what the times should be for that from several locations. Then I add in a ping to whatever servers I'm trying to access and having problems with ( :nda: ) So is the WAN default gateway the CMTS? And that's the local 'hub' for a cable network, right? How do I not know this stuff, heh.

I did chat with TW a few nights ago about it, they do some reset on their end that has helped with this in the past (it's happened a couple times in the last two years), but it didn't work this time. It was a funny transcript, because only about...20%...of my responses made it to the chat tech.

What should I be asking the techs to do on their end?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 27, 2010, 09:15:43 AM
Try a traceroute instead of a ping when the connection goes wonky.  (And maybe when it's alright for a control.)  That might give you more information on where packets start dropping.  If you get a decent tech on the line, it'll be helpful to resolving the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 27, 2010, 09:32:47 AM
Good idea, I'll ping that tonight and see what I see. My usual ping target is www.apple.com (har) as a constant because I know what the times should be for that from several locations. Then I add in a ping to whatever servers I'm trying to access and having problems with ( :nda: ) So is the WAN default gateway the CMTS? And that's the local 'hub' for a cable network, right? How do I not know this stuff, heh.

I did chat with TW a few nights ago about it, they do some reset on their end that has helped with this in the past (it's happened a couple times in the last two years), but it didn't work this time. It was a funny transcript, because only about...20%...of my responses made it to the chat tech.

What should I be asking the techs to do on their end?

It depends on how their network is setup. In the case of a large setup like TWs, the CMTS will usually be between you and the DGW, but only by one step (similar to how your library probably has you plugged into a switch which then feeds into the router which is your DGW).

If you are talking to TW on the phone and they can see into the CMTS, they should know what SNR and upstream power to expect. You could ask them if they have the ability to check the amount of usage on the upstream interface you are connected to when you are having troubles, this would indicate quickly whether or not it is a bandwidth issue.

Like Lantyssa said, a traceroute to someplace like Apple or Google will help determine where the drops are happening. In most cases, you will find that your problem is somewhere a couple hops upstream of your DGW.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on September 30, 2010, 12:54:52 PM
My video card has been RMA'd and been in limbo for 3 weeks now.  Manufacturer wants to send me 2 GTX 460 OC's (http://www3.pny.com/GTX-460-OVERCLOCKED-1024MB-PCIe-P2899C434.aspx) in place of my old GTX 470 (or a GTX 480) as they say they won't have any in for another 2-3 weeks.  I have a Thermaltake TR2 WX 850W PSU (http://www.thermaltakeusa.com/Product.aspx?C=1245&ID=1830#Tab0) (69A @ 12V). 
Two questions:
Should I take the two 460's?  Or wait?  Performance would be better according to a post by , and I'm not scared of SLI
Will my PSU handle it?  Keep in mind, I'm overclocked at 4.0Ghz (i5-750), 8GB of RAM (no big deal)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 30, 2010, 01:21:03 PM
After looking over the stuff at anands I've shifted my position to cautiously optimistic about two 460s in SLI vs a 480. As long as the money end comes together ok and you are up for SLI, I don't see why not.

Also, on the cable issue...I forgot I had tapped into the line when I moved the a/v stuff into the den while we worked on the living room. It shouldn't make a difference, the tap has one of those little booster dealies in it, but I changed it out for the barrel connector that was originally in the line there. Worked fine for at least a few hours last night, we'll see going forward if it was the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 30, 2010, 01:33:13 PM
After looking over the stuff at anands I've shifted my position to cautiously optimistic about two 460s in SLI vs a 480. As long as the money end comes together ok and you are up for SLI, I don't see why not.

Also, on the cable issue...I forgot I had tapped into the line when I moved the a/v stuff into the den while we worked on the living room. It shouldn't make a difference, the tap has one of those little booster dealies in it, but I changed it out for the barrel connector that was originally in the line there. Worked fine for at least a few hours last night, we'll see going forward if it was the problem.

If the tap/amp you put in does not have a return path amp in it, then it would probably be the cause. Most cheap tap/amps only amp on the downstream and cable modems rely on the upstream power level more than the downstream.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on September 30, 2010, 01:34:52 PM
What I'm not sure about is the amp requirement.  The 460 OC needs 38A @ 12v rail.  Does that mean that two will require 76A @ 12v?  Or does it not scale that way?  According to the Thermaltake rep I spoke to, he said everything should be fine - but I'm not 100 percent sure he knew what he was talking about...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on September 30, 2010, 04:38:05 PM
What I'm not sure about is the amp requirement.  The 460 OC needs 38A @ 12v rail.  Does that mean that two will require 76A @ 12v?  Or does it not scale that way?  According to the Thermaltake rep I spoke to, he said everything should be fine - but I'm not 100 percent sure he knew what he was talking about...

38A is awfully fucking high for a single 460, they're probably factoring for shitty PSU's.  Two of those should kick some major ass.

Also, I think my new HDD is dead.  Fuck my life.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 30, 2010, 05:17:28 PM
What I'm not sure about is the amp requirement.  The 460 OC needs 38A @ 12v rail.  Does that mean that two will require 76A @ 12v?  Or does it not scale that way?  According to the Thermaltake rep I spoke to, he said everything should be fine - but I'm not 100 percent sure he knew what he was talking about...
That's not how it works. Those numbers you see is the recommend amps on the 12V line(s) for the entire system including the GPU. The GPU itself not-OC'd will draw max 160W or 13.3A on the 12V line (scroll to bottom):

http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-geforce-gtx-460-us.html

For total system power draw you can check out measurements such as this one:

http://www.techspot.com/review/309-geforce-gtx-460-sli-performance/page9.html

The above is only a rough estimate since the system they used to measure the power draw may not be close to what you are using so you need to extropolate/guesstimate a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 01, 2010, 08:45:43 AM
Ah, ok.  Thanks for the information, good stuff as always.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 01, 2010, 08:51:38 AM
So, I'm wondering what the deal is with SLI for us 'average' gamers. Even if you have a big screen, wouldn't it be best to just get the top single card than running the risk that some kewl new hotness won't run on SLI properly?

I can understand the budget approach of getting a single cheaper card and then have, in theory at least, the option to add in another of the same later on down the line to keep costs down, but for folks with ready cash for multi thousand dollar systems, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 01, 2010, 12:53:47 PM
The game communicates to the hardware through several layers of software, and the signal going to the display is no different.  The game itself doesn't actually need to know what kind of hardware it's running on: that's the role of DirectX and display drivers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on October 01, 2010, 02:08:15 PM
The game communicates to the hardware through several layers of software, and the signal going to the display is no different.  The game itself doesn't actually need to know what kind of hardware it's running on: that's the role of DirectX and display drivers.

Do you still have to wait for nvidia to still create profiles for games?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 01, 2010, 07:48:49 PM
You can make your own. (http://www.slizone.com/page/slizone_appprofile.html)

The profiles are just slightly more advanced GPU settings.  The most significant change they make is whether the two cards operate in tandem or whether they draw alternate frames, most of the rest will be stuff you could access via the registry if you were so inclined (alternate methods of drawing certain shaders/effects, or substituting one for another of similar effect), or stuff you could change normally via the control panel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 02, 2010, 12:59:15 PM
I have an untold amount of digital family pictures and videos I desperately need to get organized.  Some of it is duplicates of backups of backups because I'm so paranoid about losing something.  And it's spread over 2 external HDD.  Long shot in the dark:  Is there any program out there that can pool all the video and photos together, organize/rename them according to the date, search for duplicates, etc?  Or do I just need to set aside a week or two and physically look at everything by hand?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 02, 2010, 01:58:29 PM
Well, assuming that your duplicates have the same file name, then you can probably do some fairly easy filtered searches, then dump all the search results into one folder. When the copying process runs across a duplicate, it will ask if you want to overwrite, etc.

I'd do a search for *.jpg for example. All the results, no matter what, put 'em in one folder. In the event of duplicates, if they have the same file name, they will have a (2) or so after the name.

As for dates, they should all have a created-on label.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on October 02, 2010, 07:02:49 PM
I use Null medialink to stream files to my PS3 from my mac, although it prohibits me from changing audio tracks or subtitle tracks when I watch them on my PS3. Since I watch a lot of foreign films/anime, getting stuck with the english audio track since it is the primary in a lot of these .mkv files is annoying. I was wondering if there was a way to switch up the primary audio track for the individual files, or get it switched through medialink itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 02, 2010, 07:16:12 PM
I'm trying to decide if this is just going to be a total piece of crap, but for $10 it is tough not to just roll the dice:

Verizon Westell 7501 Wireless G Router (https://sites.google.com/a/tds.net/unlock-your-verizon-westell-7501-wireless-g-router/home)

I'm even considering buying 2, 1 for a print server and 1 for a media server to set next to my ps3 with a 500gb usb drive attached.  Add to this the total piles of shit that linksys seems to be content cranking out lately and the urge to try something new is quite compelling.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on October 03, 2010, 07:52:37 PM
Well, assuming that your duplicates have the same file name, then you can probably do some fairly easy filtered searches, then dump all the search results into one folder. When the copying process runs across a duplicate, it will ask if you want to overwrite, etc.

I'd do a search for *.jpg for example. All the results, no matter what, put 'em in one folder. In the event of duplicates, if they have the same file name, they will have a (2) or so after the name.

As for dates, they should all have a created-on label.

They don't have the same file name - some have copy, or (1) or even a completely different name.  I have 125,000someodd .jpgs.

Maybe I've watched too much CSI, but isn't there some sort of embedded data on every photograph that some sort of software can sort through to pick out duplicates.  Free would be nice as I could start on this tonight, but I'm not worried about cost.  I'd rather spend the money than lose the entire set of photos from the day my son was born.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 03, 2010, 08:56:54 PM
You could probably find something that sorts by EXIF metadata. But the files actually have to have information there. That is all dependant on the software that saved the file in the first place.

Also, I do not have any information about a specific program that will "do that for you".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2010, 07:51:31 AM
Will a PCI Express 2.0 x16 card work in a PCI Express x16 slot?

As I mentioned in Useless Conversation, my pc is tits-up right now. Getting graphical garbage, neon pixels in a different pattern seemingly per resolution. Difficulty booting, safe mode does work, albeit with the graphical anomalies. I've isolated out the RAM and it doesn't seem to be a factor. The graphical issues seem to point at the gpu, but being able to boot into safe mode and run the computer seems odd.

I spent some time trying to stabilize the computer, nothing's working. I can imagine it being many different vectors, and honestly I'm wary of slapping a new video card into a suspect environment, even if the answer to my above question is yes (and I can magically conjure up a couple hundred bucks from nothing, heh).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 04, 2010, 08:23:57 AM
It should as long as it fits in the slot.

The PCI-E spec is supposed to be backwards compatible with the cards working at the highest clock speed of the slot if it is slower than the card (and vice versa).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 04, 2010, 08:36:44 AM
That said, Sky, chances are pretty danged good that it is your vid card. The reason it can boot to safe mode is that it doesn't call on the advanced chipset features on your GPU that are broken; its using a simpler basic VGA driver that probably doesn't engage the seriously horked elements.

I know this because I had the exact same problem a few months ago. I swore up and down it couldn't be the GPU because not only would it boot to safe mode, but the system could use a Linux boot CD without a problem either. Lo and behold, I put in a spare vid card and all the problems went away.  We also recently encountered this on a laptop with a dedicated nvidia gpu. Turns out its an HP with those broken Nvidia cards that's causing a class-action suit.

I know you don't have a spare GPU, but do you have a spare computer you can put the broken card into?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2010, 08:40:10 AM
Ok, that's cool. I'm tempted to get a 460gtx to slap in there (again, if I can work budgetary miracles given the lack of a wall in two of my rooms right now), if that's really what ails the pc. Could be months before I can do that and we're getting into Kepler territory at that point. I'd hate to grab the 460 on the eve of a really nice upgrade in gpu tech...and longer term I was thinking of two 460s in SLI (I made a quick convert, eh?), but it might be literally years before I can do the cpu/mobo/ram/gpu upgrade I talked about in the upgrade thread. If it turns out to be systemic and the psu is screwed as well, I'm truly fucked at this point.

Engels - only an AGP computer :| I long for the days when we had a good LAN group in the area, things were so much simpler then. A room of six geeks and everyone had pcs and a duffel with spare bits to swap around and troubleshoot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 04, 2010, 09:15:02 AM
Sky, what mobo and cpu do you have? I ask because it may not be worth upgrading to a 460 and you can get away with buying a chapo 9000 or ATI 4000 series card instead.

Also, what is this new revolutionary graphics tech of which you speak? If you mean the Nvidia Kepler 28 nm chip that's slated for 2011, I personally wouldn't hold my breath. The one before, the Fermi chip now used in the 400 series cards took forever to release. AMD is releasing the 6000 series, but it looks like just mild boosts to the existing 5000 series.

If you are refering to Zacate, AMD's new on-board gpu, that's not really for us. That's maybe for the mid range laptop market. For people who want to play full screen Hulu on their laptop without having a dedicated GPU. Same thing goes for Sandy Bridge, Intel's new 32 nm cpu that ostensibly does graphics.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2010, 09:34:01 AM
Kepler. My reasoning with a 460 is not having to duplicate effort, the hundred bucks I'd drop on a 9800gt would put me halfway to the 460, which I could then SLI when I can finally upgrade the system. I'm running a C2D e6600 stock 2.4GHz on an ASUS P5W DH Deluxe which is an intel 975X board.

I can't see getting a cheapo 9 series, because it would perform worse than my monster 8800gtx, which (was) really a hell of a card for its time.

All this based on conjecture that it's actually /just/ the gpu at fault here...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 04, 2010, 10:58:44 AM
well, its rock, meet hard place then :/ Sorry bud.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2010, 12:35:07 PM
I'd be excited if I weren't getting pummeled by expenses this year. Not going to bitch about it when people are looking for jobs, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 05, 2010, 06:58:37 AM
Was able to keep it stable in safe mode for a couple hours last night to run some tests that weren't turning up any results. Ordered the 460 linked below, if it turns out to be something else the egg is awesome about returns. 6 months no interest ftw.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130568


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 06, 2010, 08:37:22 AM
I need LEDs, coin batteries and possibly other bits, and I don't know if Radio Shack is the place to get that nerd shit anymore.  Anyone have any preferred electronic parts dealers?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 06, 2010, 08:57:30 AM
Radio Shack has that stuff, just not as much as it use to.

I also see those types of things at Lowe's, in the bolts, screws, washers, etc area.

But, I mostly order all that stuff online. www.mouser.com


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 06, 2010, 09:25:37 AM
I need LEDs, coin batteries and possibly other bits, and I don't know if Radio Shack is the place to get that nerd shit anymore.  Anyone have any preferred electronic parts dealers?

If there is a Fry's nearby, they have that shit. Probably more than your local radio junk does nowdays as they have shrunk their electronics parts down to almost nothing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 06, 2010, 11:21:43 AM
460 - fixed.

Then it occurs to me I should've used evga's lifetime warranty on the 8800. Dammit. I guess I could return the 460, but....I'm weak when it comes to issues of graphics and gpus...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 06, 2010, 11:51:35 AM
But you would have to wait for the RMA on the 8800!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 06, 2010, 11:58:14 AM
And once you use that new card for the 3D games that your 8800 was having trouble keeping up with...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 06, 2010, 12:01:12 PM
But, I mostly order all that stuff online. www.mouser.com

SPROING

Thanks for the link, assuming the service is good.  Exactly what I was looking for.

One Fry's in Georgia, not in a reasonable place.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 06, 2010, 12:25:39 PM
And once you use that new card for the 3D games that your 8800 was having trouble keeping up with...
They were mostly cpu-bound, and additionally the 460 is probably bound by the PCIe (not 2.0) slot it's in. The 8800gtx was a hell of a card. We'll see :P

Chimpy, true, but evga is pretty awesome about cross-shipping. Still, a few more days...and it's a 5-day weekend starting in 2-1/2 hrs....


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on October 06, 2010, 12:38:55 PM
They were mostly cpu-bound, and additionally the 460 is probably bound by the PCIe (not 2.0) slot it's in. The 8800gtx was a hell of a card. We'll see :P

I'm curious about how this is going to turn out.  My MB is also only  PCIe x16 (Intel P35 chipset) 1.0 and I'm currently running an 8800GTS in it.  On Civ V I can run in DX9 with most settings medium or high without too much issue but selecting DX 11 just makes it crap out.

I'm not really ready to upgrade my MB just yet (and by extension RAM, CPU, GPU and probably OS) so a nice intermediate step would be good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 06, 2010, 09:26:30 PM
So far the 460 is exactly what I hoped to get, a decent speed bump that draws less power and generates less heat. The rear exhaust setup on the model I got really pumps all the hot air right out of the case...but the fan seems cheap. Not super loud, but I can hear it when it gets up around 60% under heavy load (modern dx10 with ridiculous amounts of polys and effects).

Civ 5 I'm running with everything cranked in dx11, runs much better. Some odd draw-in behavior on my small map save game near the end of the game, low res terrain seems to stick until I move the camera back and forth over it a few times, then the high res stays loaded. Dunno. Anyway, it runs the dx11 client well, we'll see how it gets later in the game on bigger maps, though.

Nothing has put it over 72 degrees and about 65% fan so far. Haven't measures case internals, but they've got to be drastically lower with the external exhaust setup, the gpu exhaust is hot and the 12cm rear pc exhaust is barely over room temp under load. Note - that exhaust is unique to certain evga cards like the one I linked/bought.

Hope I can swing a system upgrade and SLI this puppy, but for now I've got a decent little speed bump to get me through for a while.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 06, 2010, 10:17:16 PM
Good to hear. Thanks for the review, specially about the specialty cooling.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 06, 2010, 11:18:02 PM
The GTX460 is a very nice card, I'd have a hard time not recommending a single for midrange systems, or SLI for high end.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on October 12, 2010, 07:45:27 PM
Have had my new computer for about a week now. Build as follows:

EVGA P55 LE
I5 760 2.8ghz
Coolermaster V8 CPU Cooler
8gb 1333mhz Corsair RAM
GeForce 470 1.2gb
Antec 850W PS

Everything's been great but when I start it up all of the lights come on, fans whirl for about 3 seconds then it shuts off. No beeps, POST, display or anything. 2 seconds pass and then it turns on and fires up normally. I've never had a PC do this, is it some kind of self-test? It's not a problem for me, just intriguing.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 12, 2010, 07:59:51 PM
Sounds like it might be shorting out. Check to see that the motherboard is not touching the baseplate in the case; ie, that the risers are all in and nothing got stuck underneath.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on October 12, 2010, 08:15:39 PM
Just a couple of hours ago I took the motherboard out to install the new CPU cooler since I'd been using the stock one. Risers are all in, nothing underneath.

FAKE EDIT: Flashed to the newest BIOS and it boots all the way through every time now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on October 12, 2010, 10:06:38 PM
Hmm after a little more reading it looks like it is a feature of EVGA mobos. I guess it is supposed to sync the CPU and PCIe clocks for better stability? With the new BIOS updates it gives you an option to disable it. Good to know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 12, 2010, 11:24:01 PM
Glad you figured it out. Sorry you had to remove the motherboard for no reason!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on October 13, 2010, 10:26:43 AM
Well, I had to take the motherboard out anyways to attach the backplate for the CPU cooler I bought. Took my idle temps from 45 down to 35 degrees which is pretty good considering it is 82F in my place. Overclocked to 3.5ghz last night and it's still sitting at 39 degrees, will probably be as far as I take it. Awesome cooler, it's quieter than the stock which is awesome too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: slog on October 13, 2010, 12:56:18 PM
Is this Nintendo DSi the right hand held console for a 5 year old?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: PkProjects on October 13, 2010, 02:42:02 PM
Is this Nintendo DSi the right hand held console for a 5 year old?

Really, I don't think any 5 year old should have a handheld. If you give them one at that age, they'll miss the ability to entertain themselves, which might result in a lack of concentration later in life.
But if you really insist on giving one, then yea, a DS would work. The PSP is more mature, as the graphics are more 'realistic' and there's more mature content on it.
Whereas the DS has games as pokemon, mario, and other cartoony looking fun games, like Mario Party.
But really, don't give them a handheld untill they reach at least the age of 7~8.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on October 17, 2010, 03:57:58 PM
Anyone know where I could find a Socket 939 motherboard? The mobo went in one of my friend's computers; neither newegg nor tiger direct seem to carry anything that old though. Worst case scenario she'll just buy a new PC, but I figured I'd ask in case someone knew a good site to buy old hardware.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 17, 2010, 06:30:43 PM
Finally installed Win 7 on my home machine.  The fonts in Firefox look way off.  I've poked around various places, without much luck.  After an all-day reinstall my question is simple: How do I make my browser fonts not look like ass?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 17, 2010, 06:53:19 PM
Weird, mine looks fine. Did you do an in-place upgrade or a wipe-and-install?

May just need to reinstall Firefox to get the fonts reloaded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 17, 2010, 07:33:30 PM
Anyone know where I could find a Socket 939 motherboard? The mobo went in one of my friend's computers; neither newegg nor tiger direct seem to carry anything that old though. Worst case scenario she'll just buy a new PC, but I figured I'd ask in case someone knew a good site to buy old hardware.

I don't know of any specifics, but you can search google shopping for "socket 939" and a bunch show up. If I am looking for something end of lifed I usually do that and then find a site that doesn't seem too shady.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 17, 2010, 08:41:46 PM
Weird, mine looks fine. Did you do an in-place upgrade or a wipe-and-install?

May just need to reinstall Firefox to get the fonts reloaded.
Fresh new disk, no upgrade.  (I never upgrade.)  I'm going to try a DVI cable tomorrow, and see if that makes any difference.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 17, 2010, 10:45:51 PM
It might. Also wondering if you're using the monitor's native resolution. Also check to see if you've got the right hertz. Some monitors are actually 59 hertz, rather than 60. Just throwing stuff out there. Also, there's a setting under Firefox (Options>Display>Fonts>Advance) that has a check box that states 'let websites determine what fonts to use instead of the default ones above' or something like that. See if toggling that makes a difference.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 17, 2010, 10:50:34 PM
Is it just the fonts on pages or the entire application, menus etc.?

Could be a font scaling issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2010, 06:50:16 AM
The text on the tab headers is blurry, with the active tab's bold being worse (any site).  F13 is amongst the worse, especially small fonts such as signatures.

I am in native resolution, however Win7 won't let me set it to 59 Hz, only 60.  I've downloaded monitor drivers, but it hasn't made any difference.  Unchecking fonts in Firefox changes the font, but doesn't really help, and makes it ugly to boot.  Is there a way to force it to let me choose 59 Hz?

(I had a similar problem where their "We know best" philosophy hurt me.  The right channel on my sound output doesn't work.  So I had it plugged into my "rear" channel.  XP detected it and let it work.  W7 detects it, but only lets me use it as a rear channel.  So my speakers are plugged into my headphone jack now. :awesome_for_real:)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 18, 2010, 07:16:39 AM
Did you try the DVI cable? I think that's still your best be. Also, if you happen to have another monitor about, even a cheapo, it would be a good quick way of troubleshooting. Honestly, I think my suggestion of 59 hertz is a stretch. I think the setting itself is not really needed, but a vestigial value from CRT days where one would have to be specific.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 18, 2010, 07:19:59 AM
Is this only an issue in firefox?

Do you have aero turned on?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2010, 08:45:53 AM
Aero is on.  It's duplicated in IE.  Nothing else I use has enough text to see if it carries over.

Turning Cleartype on and off affects windows explorer and other OS windows, but seemed to do nothing for browsers.  My work machine is still XP.  The clear font looks so much nicer right now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 18, 2010, 09:35:11 AM
Quick question: What monitor is it? I ask because I've seen some 2 year old Dell 22" monitors act really badly to higher resolutions. The messed up font is one of the symptoms. The monitor may have an 'autoadjust' feature that may be worth poking at.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 18, 2010, 10:58:23 AM
I recall having this problem at one point during the RC, but I can't recall what I did to fix it.

some things to try from a different forum:

1) Unselect cleartype
2)
   - Click Start Orb > right-click computer > click properties
   - On the left pane click Advanced system settings
   - Under performance click Settings
   - Check mark Smooth edges of screen fonts
   - Click OK > click OK

3) Change all fonts sizes and types to tahoma and Trebuchet MS (XP style).

Edit: Another thread at AnandTech says to just disable 'smooth edges of screen fonts'
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=333998


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2010, 01:35:21 PM
Hyundai K224W.  Same resolution as under XP (1680x1050).  60 Hz instead of the 59 Hz I ran under XP, but no way to change it.

I thought (2) was how to turn off cleartype.  Is there another setting for that?  (WTF can't MS put related settings in related windows for gods' sake?)  I know (2) doesn't work, and I think (3) is for system windows.  My only issue is in browsers.

I have the DVI cable in my bag.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on October 18, 2010, 01:56:59 PM
Optometrist maybe?  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 18, 2010, 03:15:07 PM
Can you post some screenshots of what you are seeing?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: proudft on October 18, 2010, 03:26:47 PM
Yeah screenshots will help narrow down rendering vs. monitor weirdness.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2010, 04:56:26 PM
Finding Cleartype and the DVI cable combined seemed to mostly get there.  Still not perfect, but much better.

Actually all the tab headings, menus, and system windows look terrible. :awesome_for_real:

Edit:  I'm going to see if I can find a refresh rate hack.  I don't feel like reproducing all the combinations of Cleartype and font smoothing right now to get a dozen screen shots.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2010, 05:15:49 PM
Current settings:

Sample 1 (http://escapedredpanda.net/hotlink/f13/font_hell_01.gif)

Sample 2 (http://escapedredpanda.net/hotlink/f13/font_hell_02.gif)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 18, 2010, 06:34:02 PM
It looks like for your desktop theme or your browser skin* you've picked a menu font that's a bitmapped font not a Open/TrueType font. Do you know what font it's using for the menu font?

Also you should run ClearType Tuner on your system -- your anti-aliasing looks wrong for your panel type.

* though you mentioned you have the same problem in IE so it's probably from a system-wide theme setting


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: proudft on October 18, 2010, 06:55:41 PM
Most of those shots look fine to me, with the exception of the 'Administrator' font.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 18, 2010, 07:06:13 PM
It looks like for your desktop theme or your browser skin* you've picked a menu font that's a bitmapped font not a Open/TrueType font. Do you know what font it's using for the menu font?

Also you should run ClearType Tuner on your system -- your anti-aliasing looks wrong for your panel type.

* though you mentioned you have the same problem in IE so it's probably from a system-wide theme setting
I'm using the default Win 7 theme.  The only thing I changed is my desktop picture.

I've tried turning ClearType on and off, and turning it on goes through a four page wizard, which seems to make no difference.

Also I'm a Win 7 newbie.  I have no clue where, if they exist, any system refinements are.  All the systems I managed were XP until a month ago.  Which worked without giving me any crap.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 18, 2010, 11:21:20 PM
If you go to Fonts in Control Panel do you have Segoe UI installed? If you do make sure ClearType is turned on and go to Preview. Unfortunately it won't show a sample at 9 point which is what the default system menus and text are in but do things look okay there (i.e. not bitmapped)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 19, 2010, 06:13:19 AM
Your samples look like my display.  I spent minimal time dicking with it before giving up.  I think I can resist being dissatisfied with my display but this post string is making it difficult.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 19, 2010, 06:26:01 AM
If you go to Fonts in Control Panel do you have Segoe UI installed? If you do make sure ClearType is turned on and go to Preview. Unfortunately it won't show a sample at 9 point which is what the default system menus and text are in but do things look okay there (i.e. not bitmapped)?
It is installed.

ClearType seems to be my problem.  After flipping switches for another thirty minutes (I couldn't read the boards in the last state I had it), I have ClearType off and Font Smoothing on.  Any title bars rendered by Aero seem a little off, but they're less off than general text going any other route.  I can probably get used to things as they are now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yoshimaru on November 05, 2010, 05:37:47 AM
Anyone have a fix for stuck pixels? I have a cluster of pixels that turned white about a month ago, I was hoping it would sort itself out but not looking like it. I've seen programs that say they can fix it by flashing colors in the area to try and reset the pixels, but not sure if that's just BS.

This (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009126) is my monitor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 05, 2010, 06:31:19 AM
A new monitor will fix it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 05, 2010, 01:07:30 PM
http://www.amazon.com/Fiskars-7854-Splitting-28-Inch-4-Pound/dp/B00004SD7B


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on November 10, 2010, 08:44:26 AM
Anyone have a fix for stuck pixels? I have a cluster of pixels that turned white about a month ago, I was hoping it would sort itself out but not looking like it. I've seen programs that say they can fix it by flashing colors in the area to try and reset the pixels, but not sure if that's just BS.

This (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009126) is my monitor.

Depends on the reason for them being stuck. I would try: Flashing colors, all white picture or leaving the monitor off for an extended period of time (24-48 hours.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yoshimaru on November 11, 2010, 04:12:04 PM
Anyone have a fix for stuck pixels? I have a cluster of pixels that turned white about a month ago, I was hoping it would sort itself out but not looking like it. I've seen programs that say they can fix it by flashing colors in the area to try and reset the pixels, but not sure if that's just BS.

This (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009126) is my monitor.

Depends on the reason for them being stuck. I would try: Flashing colors, all white picture or leaving the monitor off for an extended period of time (24-48 hours.)

Cool, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on November 16, 2010, 09:32:17 PM
Anyone heard of Windows Validation crapping itself and claiming your OS isn't genuine? Had this happen today and it only stopped bugging me after I repaired the Validation files.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 16, 2010, 10:36:12 PM
Anyone heard of Windows Validation crapping itself and claiming your OS isn't genuine? Had this happen today and it only stopped bugging me after I repaired the Validation files.

I know that for Enterprise, you need to be on the actual enterprise network it is registered to for the validation to go through. It then will work anywhere provided you don't delete the network location in "Merge/Delete Networks" that is for that network (annoying as hell for troubleshooting network issues as that step is basically step 1 on the weird network issues checklist for Vista/7) . By deleting that network location you instantly send your OS back to the "30 days to validate" BS.

I can only assume that there is a similar yet equally vague and ridiculous method of caching the registration information for other versions of 7.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: slog on November 17, 2010, 08:55:22 AM
Is it worth it to upgrade from Vista to 7?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 17, 2010, 11:41:55 AM
Is it worth it to upgrade from Vista to 7?
yes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 18, 2010, 07:55:34 PM
So other than tracking down detailed motherboard specs, is there some utility that can tell if my system will support a SATA III drive w/o downgrading it to SATA II?

Also I find it hilarious that the dell part list for my system clearly identifies the intel sticker as a part and yet the motherboard and chipset used is not apparent.

edit - Under my device manager it does say the the SATA controller is a:
Intel 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset Family 6 port SATA AHCI Controller - 3B2F

edit 2 - after searching for the controller listed above I find no mention of SATA III / 6.0 GBs capability, controller specification update pdf (http://www.intel.com/assets/pdf/specupdate/322170.pdf)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 18, 2010, 08:55:06 PM
SATA3 support is still fairly rare, and doesn't seem to make a whole lot of difference on non-ssd stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 18, 2010, 10:23:02 PM
Ya, I don't think anything from Dell is going to use SATA3. Dell also has never posted chipset specs on their documentation.

TBH, I'm not sure Intel has any chipsets that support SATA3 on the southbridge yet. They have been roadblocking it because they have their own standard coming out, I think. This info may be old.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 29, 2010, 12:59:43 PM
Wireless printer that will support both Vista and Mac OSX 10.3?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 29, 2010, 05:10:02 PM
I'm not sure why an off-the-shelf HP would not do this.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 29, 2010, 05:46:24 PM
You would think so, but the printer specs on the hp site shows OSX 10.4+ or 10.5+ under system requirements.  After my last experience trying to buy something for OSX 10.3 (a webcam) I have learned that 10.4 seems to be the magic line where all kinds of peripherals just started working with Mac.

Currently looking at either an officejet all in 1 (http://www.shopping.hp.com/store/product/product_detail/CB057A%2523B1H/1?) or a deskjet printer (http://www.shopping.hp.com/product/printer/Deskjet/1/storefronts/CH393A%2523B1H) but a little gunshy about the mac support.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 29, 2010, 08:17:06 PM
Why not upgrade? isn't it like $30 for 10.5?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 29, 2010, 11:26:59 PM
Why not upgrade? isn't it like $30 for 10.5?

You know how it goes you do something like that for a family member and all of a sudden you become responsible for every nitpicking thing on that system until it dies.  I'm not comfy enough with OSX to want that burden from 4 states away.  Plus a cousin who is familiar with OSX said that the hardware could handle an OS upgrade but it would probably be noticeably slower.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 30, 2010, 06:50:57 AM
I agree there.  Too many people know I "work on computers".  Got a call from a cousin about how he lent his computer to a friend's son to finish some homework and now he seems to have problems with his antivirus.  I had to back away from that one.  Sent his ass to Geek Squad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 30, 2010, 09:17:17 AM
10.5 and .6 run pretty well on older hardware, actually. But you run into things like 10.5 won't open the cd tray on an eMac or the fact that 10.6 won't run on PPC. I think you really need to be running the newest version your hardware supports, even on a Core Duo mini 10.6 runs pretty good with only a gig of ram. Of course, all the governmental budget destruction means no upgrade for me, everyone else (EVERYONE ELSE) is running a c2d with 4GB, dernit. I was slated to upgrade next year, I put it off to afford better upgrades for everyone else. Nothing good comes of being selfless, nobody gives a thank or a shit, really.

Friends/family know I'm to be contacted for things like help removing a tree from their property, not for fixing their computers (though I usually end up doing that anyway - how the fuck are some of these bottom-feeding shysters even in business with their expensive and incompetent "support".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on November 30, 2010, 06:47:46 PM
I am ready to freaking KILL here. I mean it. I'm about ten minutes from taking a sledgehammer to this POS Linksys WRT54G fucker.

Here's my problem: I can't log into my goddamn router. 192.168.1.1. That's the address. I tripled checked. Yes, I ran ipconfig. Yes, it's my defualt gateway. I don't even get a password prompt. I get a "cannot load page" message. From IE, from Chrome, from multiple computers.

The fucker's been giving me grief, refusing to load properly, for months -- it's like the damn thing is degrading. Worked fine for awhile, then suddenly wouldn't fully load, buttons wouldn't work, etc. And now it's acting like it's not even fucking there. I'm attached to the goddamn thing through a wire. It obviously works, since my computer, my laptop, my xbox -- all can get data just fine.

I just cannot get into the fucker to change some ports. I swear I'm about to kill. Does ANYONE have any ideas besides "Replace it" or "Hard Reset"?

I'd prefer NOT to go fuck around with all the wireless keys and redo all the shit for making the fucker work if I can avoid it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 30, 2010, 08:04:55 PM
Did you power cycle it for a couple minutes?

Hard reset is your best option, honestly.

If you have had the thing for more than 2-3 years you are well into the end of the life-cycle of the hardware anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on November 30, 2010, 08:39:56 PM
I hard resetted it and updated it's firmware. I honestly think it's a damn bug with the model. I found people bitching EVERYWHERE about it. Of course, my favorite part was trying to update the firmware without....being able to get to the modem. Linksys used to have a utility that, while twitchy to use, would update it as long as you could get a connection with it. (Which I had in spades. Ping, tracert, and of course the stupid thing WORKS fine).

It's like the magical degrading router website.

All of this shit to try to get my wife's laptop to hook up to WoW, 'cause she's finally done with her double Master's. And, of course, 90% of the problem was Vista's damn weird-ass lock on what is, and is not, 'adiminstrator'.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 30, 2010, 11:40:25 PM
I had a WRT54G. It was shit. Died after 18-ish months, doing exactly what you describe. The next step from where you are now was regular dropouts and shit wireless speeds.

Replace it now, it's not going to get better I'm afraid.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 30, 2010, 11:45:33 PM
Now you've offended my 5 year old WRT54G and it will soon cease to function.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 01, 2010, 06:07:35 AM
My experience is only with WRT54GL.  Still, sounds like drastic measures are in order.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 01, 2010, 06:32:29 AM
I think linksys's melt themselves to death over time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 01, 2010, 10:52:10 AM
I think linksys's melt themselves to death over time.
I'm due to have U-verse installed on the 13th. Doesn't that basically come with a wireless router? (I got their triple package -- phone, internet, TV). Hopefully I'll go from my anemic and practically third-world 2.5 Mbs to 10 to 12ish.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 01, 2010, 11:15:48 AM
I think linksys's melt themselves to death over time.
I'm due to have U-verse installed on the 13th. Doesn't that basically come with a wireless router? (I got their triple package -- phone, internet, TV). Hopefully I'll go from my anemic and practically third-world 2.5 Mbs to 10 to 12ish.
If it is thrown in for "free" why not, if it ends up being one of those $10 a month line item for wireless charges on your bill then I think I'd rather just go get a new linksys every year for $60.

I could give a shit less about how easy valet may or may not be to set up the bottom line is if they spent $5/unit more on making the hardware more robust I would probably never need to go through the setup process more than once. Unfortunately they spend the money on adding easy setup features because you buying a new router every year is a much better business model for them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 01, 2010, 12:07:50 PM
I think linksys's melt themselves to death over time.
I'm due to have U-verse installed on the 13th. Doesn't that basically come with a wireless router? (I got their triple package -- phone, internet, TV). Hopefully I'll go from my anemic and practically third-world 2.5 Mbs to 10 to 12ish.

Yes, the Uverse modem contains a WAP, which I am currently using in favor of my WRT54GL due to LAN design issues.  It also has four ethernet ports on the back (one goes to the DVR).  I'm possibly going to yank the router out of the equation, requiring my work laptops to go wireless, since it's just acting as a passthrough which is kind of silly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 01, 2010, 12:44:17 PM
I think linksys's melt themselves to death over time.

Pretty much all consumer grade DSL/Cable modems and routers/access points have a roughly 2 year lifecycle. The chips inside get pretty hot and the poor passive cooling and thick plastic enclosures make them a lot more susceptible to failure due to thermal issues.

Sure, you can have one last longer, but if it has lasted for 2 years you can assume your next set of problems will be easiest fixed by a replacement.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 01, 2010, 01:12:25 PM
Yes, the Uverse modem contains a WAP, which I am currently using in favor of my WRT54GL due to LAN design issues.  It also has four ethernet ports on the back (one goes to the DVR).  I'm possibly going to yank the router out of the equation, requiring my work laptops to go wireless, since it's just acting as a passthrough which is kind of silly.
The DVR is, itself, wireless to the set-top boxes, right? I live in an older house, which means only some of my wall sockets are properly grounded. Sadly, the room my TV in is not one of them. (it's grounded by having a lovely adapter plug that grounds to the house frame via the screw holding the socket plate on. I should get that fixed. Anyways, right now I'm looking at "everything U-verse needs" having to go basically 30 feet from the TV, across a wide room. That spot is, however, close to the phone jack.

My biggest issue is both my desktops lack a wireless card, although both the laptop and the Xbox have wireless setup already. Thankfully, one of the desktops is dead until I figure out what the hell burnt up, so I can always buy a cheap-o wireless card for my other one and shove it in an empty slot.

Salamok: Yeah, it's like built in. It's how you get to watch the DVR on other tvs and shit. Their set-top boxes come built in with wireless, so you really only need the one DVR.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 01, 2010, 01:44:57 PM
Why would you want to go wireless in your home?  Your speed suffers if you're not wired. :|


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 01, 2010, 01:51:34 PM
Why would you want to go wireless in your home?  Your speed suffers if you're not wired. :|

108mbps wireless-n yeah I get that there is a ton of overhead taking up bandwidth but it is still much faster than the 5-10mbs my ISP is allocating me.  My ps3 sits about a foot from my router and I don't even bother running a wire for that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 01, 2010, 02:47:47 PM
Why would you want to go wireless in your home?  Your speed suffers if you're not wired. :|
Well...the laptop's obvious. Xbox is...well the hell away from any jacks and the desktops. The logical places to put the Uverse boxes are also nowhere near anything except the phones.

My house is 30 years old. It's not wired for it, and I have no intention of spending the money or time trying to cable it.

And my max U-verse speed is...12Mbs. I'm pretty sure that's not going to max out my wireless, even with three TV signals (only one HD).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 01, 2010, 03:25:41 PM
The DVR is, itself, wireless to the set-top boxes, right?

Mine isn't.  Is there an option?  Seems unlikely, I do not believe a wireless connection could provide the proper connection speed.  Besides the guy who installed my five units spent all fucking day running coax, testing lines and whatnot so if it was an option he would have mentioned it.  You will have a hard line from the phone jack to the modem, and it's ethernet from there to the DVR.  Additional units use coax connections run from the DVR, but not having bothered to look they might also use ethernet.  Not that you have that.

They will also install a UPS since if you lose power to your modem, your phones do not work.  Pitfall of VOIP.

My biggest issue is both my desktops lack a wireless card,

The "inside tech" should give you a USB dongle, so you're not SOL.

Also if you have an alarm system, ask the security guy if it works well with VOIP.

EDIT to add that, despite what you might have been told or inferred, you cannot pause live TV on the non-DVR units.  Pause recordings, yes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 01, 2010, 03:36:02 PM
Related, anyone want a 2Wire 2701HG-B DSL modem?  I have two spare.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 01, 2010, 03:45:29 PM
The "inside tech" should give you a USB dongle, so you're not SOL.

Also if you have an alarm system, ask the security guy if it works well with VOIP.

EDIT to add that, despite what you might have been told or inferred, you cannot pause live TV on the non-DVR units.  Pause recordings, yes.
That explains the install time. USB dongle is fine, unless it's got some ridiculously low bandwidth issues. I'd assume the wireless part of their WAP is at least 54Mpbs.

Best I can understand on Uverse, they really have either 25 or (if you're fucking lucky on distance) 32 to the house. They reserve some of that for phone and TV. I think it's 8, might be twelve. I got the impression it was a hard split -- very similiar to DSL's "Here's your voice part, here's your Internet part" -- so I don't think it leeches off my internet bandwidth if I'm watching TV.

Downsides, can only view 4 channels -- (each HD counts as 2) -- live, which means if I'm watching an HD and recording an HD, then the other two tvs have to be watching DVR'd shit. (Which is one reason I got the DVR, although everyone watches Netflix most of the time anyways).

Of course, if it is a hard split, I'm getting 25Mbs to my house just to get the TV service, so why do they charged tiered prices at 3, 6, 9 and 12 Mbs for internet on top? Besides the obvious "So we can make more dough?"


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 01, 2010, 06:59:17 PM
UVerse says it dedicates 7 mb/s to video, but they QoS your internet down if you are watching multiple different TV streams in HD as 7 is basically just a little more than enough for one HD stream.

You have to remember that UVerse is not FiOS where the fiber comes directly to your house, they are dealing with DSL technology and the length and quality of the copper loop back to the node is a big deal. They are probably doing pair bonded profile 12a which would give you at best about 45mb/s at a wire mile if I remember the documentation I was going through at the old job.

One thing of note, if you get 4 set top boxes you should be able to watch the same channel in HD on 3 of them at the same time and still be able to watch a second on another TV as it should be multicast.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 02, 2010, 06:42:16 AM
So, I've been given a NP2900 network media player (http://www.philips.co.uk/c/wireless-audio-products/streamium-free-internet-radio-full-colour-display-np2900_05/prd/) as a gift and I'm having some issues getting it to play nice with media libraries.

It reads and plays from a WMP12 library on a PC fine - songs are in the right order in albums, there's artwork, etc. But I also have a D-Link NAS (http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=509) that runs a uPnP media server, and it'd be awesome to be able to use that as the main source rather than having to have a PC on all the time. Problem is that whatever I do, the NAS media server won't tell the NP2900 what order to play albums in, doesn't show artwork, etc.

Anyone got any ideas how I can make the NAS media server replicate the functionality of the WMP12 server? I've tried copying the WMP12 music files directly onto the NAS but no dice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 02, 2010, 08:23:47 AM
You have to remember that UVerse is not FiOS where the fiber comes directly to your house, they are dealing with DSL technology and the length and quality of the copper loop back to the node is a big deal. They are probably doing pair bonded profile 12a which would give you at best about 45mb/s at a wire mile if I remember the documentation I was going through at the old job.

I think the max range is 2500 feet.  It's definitely more sensitive than ADSL.  It seems to drop more often than the ADSL did but it's cheaper overall than the discrete items it replaces, particularly DirecTV.  And my internet speed is definitely faster.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 02, 2010, 09:20:49 AM
UVerse says it dedicates 7 mb/s to video, but they QoS your internet down if you are watching multiple different TV streams in HD as 7 is basically just a little more than enough for one HD stream.

You have to remember that UVerse is not FiOS where the fiber comes directly to your house, they are dealing with DSL technology and the length and quality of the copper loop back to the node is a big deal. They are probably doing pair bonded profile 12a which would give you at best about 45mb/s at a wire mile if I remember the documentation I was going through at the old job.

One thing of note, if you get 4 set top boxes you should be able to watch the same channel in HD on 3 of them at the same time and still be able to watch a second on another TV as it should be multicast.
Yeah, they offer...4 input streams for TV. HD counts as two, which means that "7 mb/s" can't be right. Has to be 14 mb/s. That leaves 11 mb/s for internet and phone, if you're streaming max channels. Which fits, as they'll only install if you can get 25 mb/s on their system (that's what seems to inform their distance requirements). They have a new setup for people who can get 32 mb/s, but the one person I know that got bumped to that rapidly ran into pixelization problems which didn't resolve until they dropped him back to 25 mb/s.

My wife finds it amusing that I have to absolutely understand all this crap before I'm comfortable with it in the house. She's happy to view it as "magic plug in the wall that makes the internet and TV work".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 02, 2010, 01:28:24 PM
It's fine to be ignorant as long as the magic works as expected.  First problem?  Demand explanation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 04, 2010, 07:46:13 AM
It's fine to be ignorant as long as the magic works as expected.  First problem?  Demand explanation.
Yes. She's currently learning the intricacies of a specific Motorala built driod. I think she almost made Class A, 'Jesus Christ, agree to anything to get her off the phone and stop yelling at me' coldly-pissed off customer when the phone they shipped her to replace her broken phone was more broken than the one she had.

"Dp you know how to do a master reset of the phone?"
"I know A method. Do you have a secret method that deals with the fucking fact that this goddamn phone won't go past the motorala splash screen more than 10% of the time? It's randomly rebooting mid-bood sequence. Do I sacrifice a fucking chicken?"


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 04, 2010, 09:30:34 AM
At least it didn't explode.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 06, 2010, 11:47:04 AM
I have a ASUS RT-N12 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833320039) wireless router. Two odd things.

1) Wireless seems flaky. Every few hours it will drop connection and I have to disable/enable the adapter on the pc to get a connection again. Wired connection is solid.

2) Wired speed is about 20% of the wireless speed?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 06, 2010, 12:08:24 PM
Is there a device in the range of the AP that is broadcasting in 802.11a? I have read a couple of articles on extremely degraded 802.11n performance when there is signalling being done by devices in 802.11a (uses the same frequency bands) which could lead to the connection needing to be reset. This all assumes you are connecting with n and not b/g,

Only time I have seen weird speed issues on a home router through the wire, I had the customer reset to defaults and it fixed the issue (his was a linksys and he could connect fine direct to the wall, but through his router he had a 90% speed loss) but I am not familiar with the ASUS routers at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 06, 2010, 12:18:37 PM
I'm on b iirc, her laptop is n. Not sure what else might be using that freq, it's the only 802.11 device afaik. I also have transceivers for my gamepad, keyboard and 3d glasses (went to a wired mouse because the wireless mouse was flaky). Really, really good connection when it's working, though. Afaik, the performance is fine right up until it quits.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 06, 2010, 12:22:57 PM
Are your wireless adapter's drivers up to date? Also, if you are running Win Vista/7, turn off IPv6 for the wireless connection.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on December 07, 2010, 10:38:09 PM
I remember a few years back hearing good things about GoogleGear. Never bought anything from them but they had prices comparable to Newegg. They were forced to change their name to ZipZoomFly in 2003 it looks like.

When I was putting my PC together last month I checked their site and damned near everything is out of stock. Out of curiosity, does anyone know what happened to them? It's like an online version of a zombie mall.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on December 08, 2010, 08:27:19 AM
So I have a file that is about 10-12 Gigabytes that I need to back up every work day.  My current method is to use two externals and back up on one locally and take the other home.  I am thinking of trying to set up an online system and wondered if anyone had an opinion as to the feasibility of backing up this amount of data over the internet. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on December 08, 2010, 10:38:03 AM
Paid (not free) dropbox? Can't remember what the size limit is.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 08, 2010, 10:51:31 AM
So I have a file that is about 10-12 Gigabytes that I need to back up every work day.  My current method is to use two externals and back up on one locally and take the other home.  I am thinking of trying to set up an online system and wondered if anyone had an opinion as to the feasibility of backing up this amount of data over the internet. 

I am suspicious that the bandwidth options will not be to your liking.  Not without paying someone some badass monies.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 08, 2010, 02:41:14 PM
So I have a file that is about 10-12 Gigabytes that I need to back up every work day.  My current method is to use two externals and back up on one locally and take the other home.  I am thinking of trying to set up an online system and wondered if anyone had an opinion as to the feasibility of backing up this amount of data over the internet.

Do you really mean "file" as in "file", rather than "folder?"  As in "SB.pdf is 12 GB large, the fuck?  Do we even have a computer that can open this without generating an apphang?"


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 08, 2010, 03:07:25 PM
My only guess was it is some kind of large access (or similar) database where the "file" is the actual full database tree and records.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 08, 2010, 03:40:13 PM
I've been using Amazon's S3 service with an app that connects to it while emulating a networked folder. Works pretty well, but use the cost calculator to determine your monthly charges for upload/storage of the beast. The daily upload will cost a bit, maybe just upload it once a week?

Edit:
Here: http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html

Quick numbers with S3 (select on the left side)
12gb storage a month
12gb upload a day
$36.08/month


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 08, 2010, 05:09:54 PM
My only guess was it is some kind of large access (or similar) database where the "file" is the actual full database tree and records.

I'm sort of guessing that too, but those are usually the sort of thing that are can be accessed from home provided the proper security credentials anyways.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on December 08, 2010, 06:16:29 PM
I've been using Amazon's S3 service with an app that connects to it while emulating a networked folder. Works pretty well, but use the cost calculator to determine your monthly charges for upload/storage of the beast. The daily upload will cost a bit, maybe just upload it once a week?

Edit:
Here: http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html

Quick numbers with S3 (select on the left side)
12gb storage a month
12gb upload a day
$36.08/month

The cost isn't particularly a problem, from what I can tell from looking at services that are out there, however it does need to be uploaded daily.  It's patient files, so I have to be very careful about it.  And yes, it is a single "file" that contains a bunch of crap that I'm too lazy to figure out exactly what it is.  I wish the people that do my patient management software would come up with an incremental backup solution, but this portion of the system sucks ass.  I have a multi location practice and the server is at one office.  I'm essentially trying to figure out how to keep from going to the central location every day to back up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 08, 2010, 06:24:40 PM
Do you really mean "file" as in "file", rather than "folder?"  As in "SB.pdf is 12 GB large, the fuck?  Do we even have a computer that can open this without generating an apphang?"
Our genome sequencer cannot fit two runs on a terabyte drive.  Yes, it's one file.  A patent we submitted was 33 GB (though only 1.4 GB compressed).

The cost isn't particularly a problem, from what I can tell from looking at services that are out there, however it does need to be uploaded daily.  It's patient files, so I have to be very careful about it.  And yes, it is a single "file" that contains a bunch of crap that I'm too lazy to figure out exactly what it is.  I wish the people that do my patient management software would come up with an incremental backup solution, but this portion of the system sucks ass.  I have a multi location practice and the server is at one office.  I'm essentially trying to figure out how to keep from going to the central location every day to back up.
I'd lean towards keeping it in-house then.

Does rsync have an incremental option, in case of disconnection?  You could break it apart into more reasonable blocks and then it's not such a worry.  Simply restart that portion if it fails.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 08, 2010, 07:05:23 PM
Do you need to have an actual copy of the file on-site at your other location(s) or are you already connecting to the database remotely and just need a method to do automatic backups?

You probably want some kind of NAS that integrates normal "tape" style backup solutions with remote replication. Something along the lines of the SnapServer from Overland Storage http://www.overlandstorage.com/products/network-attached-storage/#top might be what you are really looking for.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 08, 2010, 07:05:31 PM
As I'm sure you know, if it's patient data (something I have some new experience with) be very careful where you put it and how: HIPAA, HITECH and all that. If you encrypt it well (use HTTPS to upload, as well as encrypt the file with 128bit encryption) it might be ok - not sure what your software provides.

If you setup Gladinet Cloud Desktop to connect to your S3 account you just need to setup a Windows backup job to copy the file to the folder every night. Pretty simple really. If its not on a Windows server there are other solutions as well. The S3 SLA of '99.999999999% Durability' is probably sufficient to make it your only backup, but a local copy wouldn't hurt for ease of recovery if needed.

Have you looked at management software that is web-based? Such as:

http://www.eclinicalworks.com/products-practice-management.htm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on December 08, 2010, 07:16:14 PM
I'm an orthodontist, so the software I use is pretty specific for what I do.  It wouldn't be easy to switch, and the options all have their positives and negatives.  The particular one I use is mac based and actually allows me to reach my patient data from any location quite easily as it is stored in the central office.  The big issue, it seems to me, is going to be trying to upload a chunk of data that is 8-12 GB every night.  This will get bigger as time goes on, as well, probably causing me even more headaches if I try to do online backup.  I have been testing an online backup today, and it looks like I may end up having to opt for doing a remote desktop and putting a drive somewhere on the other side of the office for ghetto remote. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 08, 2010, 07:36:47 PM
If you are already accessing this remotely, and you are just doing off-site backups for catastrophic data loss, you really should think about how often doing offsite backups is necessary to keep your data at the point where the loss of a certain amount is not catastrophic.

You could just have a tape backup run every day, then one day a week you take a copy of the tape with you to the other office for "disaster" recovery. Or you get some kind of solution that does an upload to a remote storage facility once every 3 days automatically (or whatever interval you have decided is your ideal interval).

Also, have you talked to your software vendor about what backup solutions they recommend? (this usually gives you a good starting point to go from)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 08, 2010, 07:48:44 PM
So really, you just want a backup since remote access is already possible?

Build a low performance desktop with a RAID, put it on a UPS, connect it to your network, stick it somewhere cool and dry.  If your software supports automatic backups do that.  It won't protect it from fire and flood, but it will from random hardware failure, and from electrical damage that does not include a near direct lightning strike.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on December 08, 2010, 07:52:35 PM
Also, have you talked to your software vendor about what backup solutions they recommend? (this usually gives you a good starting point to go from)

They recommend two external disks to which you drag over a "backup file" every day.  One you take home, one you leave on site.  It isn't that big of a deal, other than having to actually be physically at the location. 

And yes, it needs to absolutely be backed up every day that I see patients.  Losing even one day's worth of notes could be a real problem.  In reality, it should probably be backed up at lunch hour, too, but I don't do that. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 08, 2010, 09:24:10 PM
I don't think you understood my question. You can run an automated backup with just about any system that does backups (tape/disk etc.) and that is something that can easily be done as someone posted above. Having a remote backup is a disaster recovery thing. Not like "the hard drive crashed" kind of recovery but the "the whole office got uprooted by a tornado" kind. If that absolutely has to be done every day, then you need to have some form of replication of your backups.

You need an automated backup system, be it a cheap open source NAS RAID or a tape drive that does daily (or even twice daily backups) that is local to your office with the server. By local I mean somewhere on that office LAN be it directly connected to the server itself, or a network attached device. How you then make off-site backups of that, and how often you do that, becomes the question of the day.

Doing a daily replication of 12gb over the internet is going to probably get you into "paying a lot more for internet service" territory as well.

It seems like the vendor you are using for the software has a huge hole in their design if their only backup solution is "copy the entire database". There should at the very least be some form of incremental backup option where only records that have been changed since the last backup are added to the new backup (in a system like this, remote replication can be done a lot easier/quickly/more often as I am sure the actual changes to your database are likely less than 100mb a day and not the whole 12gb a day).

EDIT: Also, your server absolutely has to have some form of RAID in it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on December 08, 2010, 09:57:36 PM
So really, you just want a backup since remote access is already possible?

Build a low performance desktop with a RAID, put it on a UPS, connect it to your network, stick it somewhere cool and dry.  If your software supports automatic backups do that.  It won't protect it from fire and flood, but it will from random hardware failure, and from electrical damage that does not include a near direct lightning strike.

Pretty much this.  I've also seen some low end NAS solutions that would be affordable.   Fill it with disks, set up your raid, and you're good to go.  There's got to be commercial software that does some form of ghetto remote mirroring for cheap. 

You'd have WAY more storage than you'd ever need.  You could keep multiple backups, no sweat.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 09, 2010, 04:56:45 AM
Do you actually need to replicate the whole file everyday?  Or just the delta?  Decent back up software should be able to handle incremental back ups which should be much smaller than 12 gb.

Or

Get a co-lo somewhere decent and sftp (or whatever) the files to it.

I googled "colo w/ 300gb transfer" and see prices from 60/mo to 300/mo.  If this actually is a legit expense a couple of hundred a month doesn't sound unreasonable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 09, 2010, 05:50:17 AM
I've been using Amazon's S3 service with an app that connects to it while emulating a networked folder. Works pretty well, but use the cost calculator to determine your monthly charges for upload/storage of the beast. The daily upload will cost a bit, maybe just upload it once a week?

Edit:
Here: http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html

Quick numbers with S3 (select on the left side)
12gb storage a month
12gb upload a day
$36.08/month

Informative.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 09, 2010, 05:58:58 AM
Just thinking about the backup issue here, automation is the way to go.  Your IT guys telling you to manually drag a file into a folder is bullshit, so hopefully you are not paying them very much.  Using a Mac, I would assume you can write a Apple version of a shell script.  With Windows you can do the same with batch files.  If it's just copying a file then it's amazingly easy to write this.  If you are using a real DB (would hope so) then things get more complicated.

I don't know what rdbms you are using.  Why would you not want an online backup if you have that ability?  A DB with online backup ability would, I assume, have some crash recovery and log archiving (Oracle, DB2, but my experience is with commercial products).  You could run a online DB backup every 2-3 days (aggressive) and every hour or two copy off the recovery logs.  Like I said, I don't know what DB you are using or what it is capable of.  I do know, however, if you are doing a daily offline of the whole DB, you're doing it wrong.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on December 09, 2010, 05:59:38 AM
Just thinking about the backup issue here, automation is the way to go.  Your IT guys telling you to manually drag a file into a folder is bullshit, so hopefully you are not paying them very much.  Using a Mac, I would assume you can write a Apple version of a shell script.  With Windows you can do the same with batch files.  If it's just copying a file then it's amazingly easy to write this.  If you are using a real DB (would hope so) then things get more complicated.

I don't know what rdbms you are using.  Why would you not want an online backup if you have that ability?  A DB with online backup ability would, I assume, have some crash recovery and log archiving (Oracle, DB2, but my experience is with commercial products).  You could run a online DB backup every 2-3 days (aggressive) and every hour or two copy off the recovery logs.  Like I said, I don't know what DB you are using or what it is capable of.  I do know, however, if you are doing a daily offline of the whole DB, you're doing it wrong.

I pay my IT guys nothing, for it is me.  The backup scheme is simply the company's recommendation. 

The backup setup for this program is actually decent if you have something go wrong and I really have no issues with implementing it if I am at the main office.  I have two friends that have had issues (one flood and one theft) where the main server got put out of commission.  The program company had them back up and running within a few hours.  Manual backup works decent if you're just in one office, it just doesn't work well for multi office.  I've also had some folks that had tape drives and all other sorts of backup schemes go to restore their data after a disaster only to find there's nothing there..... Woo that would suck. 

Yeah, after dicking around with this for a bit I think I'm just going to have to do an "off site" backup on days that I'm at the main office.  It's a bit risky, but bandwidth is a real bitch on this one.  I'm also going to bitch at the program company and see if I can't get them to do something about file backup size.  They have got to get into the modern world and figure out off site backup automation. 

As for the issues with the program itself, yes, this portion of it sucks.  The problem is that these programs are very niche and quite expensive, so switching is not really an option.  There are some other options out there that have better backup plans, but they don't do what I need them to do for the clinical and financial management and their remote access kind of sucks.  So I'm stuck with it for a while.  I would love an online record, but that won't be coming for orthodontics any time soon, I don't think.

Thanks for the advice, everyone!   :drill:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 09, 2010, 06:23:09 AM
Years ago we used Retrospect with a tape drive.  It did incremental deltas, so once a full backup was done, the rest went quickly.  Disks are huge nowadays, so the tape drive is unnecessary, but the software should work the same.  What you want is out there, it's just a matter of finding what will work with your set-up.

Whatever you do, I have to echo what was said and say make sure it's automated.  Certainly check it for integrity as often as you can, but you'll forget to do the back ups at all eventually if you have to always do it yourself.  (You'll always forget to either check or to perform the backup.  With one there's a reasonable chance of the data being there with no action on your part once it's working.  The other, you're out of luck.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on December 09, 2010, 06:30:09 AM
How about this.  Get a BD burner and a stack of blu-ray discs.  Set a script to burn the disc every day at the end of the day.  Every morning, swap out the disc and mail the old one to yourself at home or where ever.

If you can't be on site one day to swap discs it doesn't take much training to get a knucklehead to do it for you.

You spend 30 seconds a day on it and 100 bucks up front and otherwise can forget about it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 09, 2010, 07:02:25 AM
Most importantly, make sure you can recover from backup.  Backups are really useless, it's the restore that's important.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 09, 2010, 08:27:31 AM
Depends on your bandwidth. At home, I use Mozy. They have a business/professional setup as well. The first full backup takes awhile, but after that it's incremental and automatic.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 09, 2010, 01:30:13 PM
That's ghost's problem, tho, if I have understood him. He can't do incremental because its one single honkin file, which while it may have 'bits' inside it, the format is of one file. So incremental data backup is not going to work, unless he can somehow expand that one file, do a comparison of the inside of the file to an older one, and then only update those files, and then recompress/close/whatever. That seems unlikely.

I like the idea of the BluRay backup. My only caveat is that, like tape drives, involves fairly delicate physical media that's susceptible to wear and tear over time. I've gone through 3 BluRay players, nevermind recorders, in the last year.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lt.Dan on December 09, 2010, 03:35:07 PM
So I'm considering installing Windows 7 on my PC.  I want to do an upgrade install on a new hard drive which seems to be possible although there is the potential for it go wrong.  I'm going from 32 bit Vista Home Premium to 64 bit Windows Home Premium.

Has anyone else tried this?

Aside from the possible/not-possible question, are there other things I should be aware of?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 09, 2010, 06:00:29 PM
an upgrade install on a new hard drive is the same as a full reinstall, it will just ask you for your vista media to prove you have a qualifying upgrade product.  W7 was the easiest OS install I ever did.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 09, 2010, 06:34:37 PM
Agree, W7 was even slightly easier than Ubuntu.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 10, 2010, 06:49:29 AM
Newb question time.  How do these speakers attach to my PC?  My system has onboard sound, simple setup.  I've used stock cheapo 3.5mm jack speakers for the longest time and I'm looking to take it up a notch.  

Can they simply hook directly into the 3.5mm on my MB, or does it need other hardware?  Thanks!

http://www.amazon.com/M-Audio-Studiophile-AV-Powered-Speakers/dp/B000MUXJCO/ref=dp_cp_ob_e_title_1


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 10, 2010, 07:45:25 AM
Newb question time.  How do these speakers attach to my PC?  My system has onboard sound, simple setup.  I've used stock cheapo 3.5mm jack speakers for the longest time and I'm looking to take it up a notch.  

Can they simply hook directly into the 3.5mm on my MB, or does it need other hardware?  Thanks!

http://www.amazon.com/M-Audio-Studiophile-AV-Powered-Speakers/dp/B000MUXJCO/ref=dp_cp_ob_e_title_1

They will most likely have either an RCA connector on the back for left-right or a TRS jack of some size. All you will need is an adapter.

While I love me some M-Audio (and I love me some studio monitors), I have been very happy with my Alesis M1Acitve 320USB speakers which are about half the price. LINK (http://www.amazon.com/Alesis-M1Active-Studio-Monitor-Pair/dp/B0011Z87I0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=musical-instruments&qid=1291996012&sr=1-1)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 11, 2010, 04:32:39 PM
You would think so, but the printer specs on the hp site shows OSX 10.4+ or 10.5+ under system requirements.  After my last experience trying to buy something for OSX 10.3 (a webcam) I have learned that 10.4 seems to be the magic line where all kinds of peripherals just started working with Mac.

Currently looking at either an officejet all in 1 (http://www.shopping.hp.com/store/product/product_detail/CB057A%2523B1H/1?) or a deskjet printer (http://www.shopping.hp.com/product/printer/Deskjet/1/storefronts/CH393A%2523B1H) but a little gunshy about the mac support.

After I finally end up tracking down a wireless printer (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16828103315) that lists itself as compatable with OS 10.3.9/Win Vista and 30 minutes after ordering my Mom is telling me that they just switched from comcast to Direct TV/AT&T, the install tech convinced her that she needs to upgrade to 10.4 or her internet won't work  :facepalm:

Maybe I'll show up for Christmas wearing clown shoes so I won't feel left out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on December 13, 2010, 12:59:26 PM
I have two inboxes at work running on Outlook 2007: Personal and general. The general box started receiving in only plain text a week or two ago, but I can't figure out why. It's an IMAP account and I originally thought it was AVG, but I had everyone disable the email scanner with no luck. If they copy my personal email when sending to the general one, it's received with formatting in my personal box and plain text in the general.

I'm at a loss for what the hell is going on. Any ideas?

If it matters: We use Google for our email and Google Sync.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 13, 2010, 01:07:28 PM
Did you go to your mail options in Outlook and see if it has "show plain text" checked?

I think there might be a contextual menu option that toggles that on as well but not sure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 13, 2010, 01:29:20 PM
I know there's a toggle to -send- in Html or plain text, but I'm not sure where the receive options are. I couldn't find them in my Office 2010.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 13, 2010, 01:54:13 PM
Stupid ATT, whose computers apparently are incapable of calculating distance. I spend the weekend moving furniture around, getting shit ready for U-verse, and being very happy at:

1) Ditching motherfucking Comcast.
2) Going from 3 Mb/s to 12 Mb/s for internet.
3) Saving 60+ bucks a month.

What I get, after the techs are gone, is told that am I not close enough (apparently I am just as far away, or possibly further, than I was two years ago. Their boxes are migrating, it appears). I think find that 3Mb/s is the best I can do, DSL-wise, because apparently despite living in the suburbs, to the phone company I apparently live in a shack in the woods. Hope is briefly raised at the suggestion -- from ATT -- that TV might be a no-go, but the range for a uverse phone+internet is much longer. I would only be saving about 10 bucks a month, and eat an installation fee, but that might waive the latter.

Only to find out that the engineer who came out flagged my entire neighborhood as 'out of range' (probably because, as he noted, he'd personally been out twice  this month to this pair of streets to tell people "Sorry" -- apparently we're the asshole streets, who don't get service) which means no one short of God himself can even put an order out for phone+internet, because as far as uverse is concerend, we're on Mars.

Fuck. I DON'T want comcast internet. I don't want to turn to that pile of evil and villiany, and mostly I don't want a variable pipe.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 13, 2010, 02:32:10 PM
The outside installers told me that it's all guesswork until the cable is laid and measured.  They use a signal to measure so it's not literally physical distance but rather Magic Distance based on interference; first measure had me at 5500 feet, which was ludicrous unless the original installers buried a whole spool in my field.  Which makes me happy that I got it.  For a while there no one was sure, and in fact they laid a new cable for me which measured 550 feet.  Even better, they didn't hit my gas, water or power lines while crisscrossing them with the ditchwitch.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 13, 2010, 02:34:57 PM
Currently on hold with Qwest. I feel your pain Morat. No, really, actually, at this very moment. I've spent more time on the phone with Qwest in the last week than I have with my entire extended family for the last two years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 13, 2010, 03:00:46 PM
The outside installers told me that it's all guesswork until the cable is laid and measured.  They use a signal to measure so it's not literally physical distance but rather Magic Distance based on interference; first measure had me at 5500 feet, which was ludicrous unless the original installers buried a whole spool in my field.  Which makes me happy that I got it.  For a while there no one was sure, and in fact they laid a new cable for me which measured 550 feet.  Even better, they didn't hit my gas, water or power lines while crisscrossing them with the ditchwitch.
At this point, they can stick whole new neighberhood box in my front yard. Go for it. Screw property values. I want something faster than 3 mb/s and I don't want comcast. Is there some magic variant of "please" that will get them to come do SOMETHING? I don't live on a farm. I live within 2 blocks of a high school and a junior high, within two miles of a huge collection of refineries, in a city of 20,000+ less than 15 miles from downtown houston. Yes, it's an older neighborhood, which is why all the new fucking neighborhoods have u-verse and I don't. UPGRADE MY DAMN LINES.

I've spent my whole life avoiding cable internet, because I don't like variables speeds. I want a constant range, that I will always be at, because when you run a "it depends on what your neighbors are doing" pipe, I constantly suspect somehow I'm getting played. The fact that I'd totally believe comcast would drop my speed and blame my neighbors just for shits and giggles doesn't help. (Yes, I loathe Comcast. I loathe their shitty DVR's that break constantly. I loathe their piss-poor service, with it's constant pixellation and dropouts. I loathe their customer service, apparently run by drunken assholes. There is NOTHING good about them. Satan takes notes from them on how to make Hell worse).

Fuck, fuck, fuckity fuck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 13, 2010, 04:27:31 PM
Dude, I haven't had any issues with Comcast's speed in a decade.  I'm at Beltway 8 and my bandwidth surrounded by "the bad part of town" is easily 5 Mb/s and not the limiting factor for the majority of my downloads.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 13, 2010, 04:30:29 PM
You can get variable speeds with DSL too it just happens at a different place. Nobody that I'm aware of sells consumer-grade (read cheap) bandwidth with guaranteed minimum bandwidth to a peering point.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 13, 2010, 05:29:29 PM
Dude, I haven't had any issues with Comcast's speed in a decade.  I'm at Beltway 8 and my bandwidth surrounded by "the bad part of town" is easily 5 Mb/s and not the limiting factor for the majority of my downloads.
That's just one of my many issues with comcast. Since my others all revolve around the shitty quality of their service (bad pictures, stuttering, constant outages) and their worse customer service, I can't think their internet service will magically be better.

Which is sort of the problem. ATT's been pretty solid, and the only reason I haven't switched to satellite for TV is that Comcast cleaned up it's act (coinicdentally when u-verse was rolled out in Houston0 JUST ENOUGH for me not to want to futz with satellite, but bundling TV with my phone and internet? Price savings is totally worth the hassle.

If I could get it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 13, 2010, 05:43:31 PM
You can get variable speeds with DSL too it just happens at a different place. Nobody that I'm aware of sells consumer-grade (read cheap) bandwidth with guaranteed minimum bandwidth to a peering point.


This.

It is all shared SOMEWHERE. It is just that your link to the DSLAM on DSL is on a dedicated pair. In cable, you share from your house to the CMTS.

As far as the distance thing goes, until a tech plunks a meter on your pair going back to the DSLAM, there is no way to know what speeds you will be able to get over your pair. And you have to remember that the distance number they use is Wire miles, not road miles. The cabinet could be a block away from you but you may be connected to it via a chain that goes 10 blocks out of the way to get there. The wireline infrastructure was installed, in many cases, 40+ years ago and was usually dictated by "get phone service to this address however is easiest" not "layout network in most efficient fashion for DSL".



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 14, 2010, 07:39:51 AM
I'm not advocating Comcast, not at all, but AT+T does QoS the shit out of you.  That's basically how they manage TV/voice/data.  Although I usually get 2-3x the speed I had on ADSL (with going from "3Gb" to "12Gb"), it is somewhat quirky.  I'm attributing this mostly to new technology.

The way that I got the line quality that I did was that they had to install a new line for my new address in 2002 (no previous house on the field), and I was connected to then-new equipment back at the CO.  Right now there should be fibre to my DSLAM, and I am not in a dense neighborhood, and it's mostly old and poor people.  My only advice on getting a modern line is to build a new house; I'm guessing AT+T isn't upgrading aggressively.  During the housing boom, there was no real need or available people since they were doing new installs.  Currently, AT+T is doing what every other large corp is doing: outsourcing and laying off people.  I don't know... good luck.

I feel like I have to say that Comcast is not ever getting any money from me again, for being absolute dicks back when they had no competition.

Edit to say that you might be able to get moved to a new cabinet if you complain about your existing service enough.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 14, 2010, 08:49:55 AM
Edit to say that you might be able to get moved to a new cabinet if you complain about your existing service enough.

If there is another cabinet close enough. A fresh set of pairs to the existing cabinet would be more likely.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 14, 2010, 09:02:17 AM
Edit to say that you might be able to get moved to a new cabinet if you complain about your existing service enough.

If there is another cabinet close enough. A fresh set of pairs to the existing cabinet would be more likely.
Who the fuck knows? However, I can tell you this: My neighborhood has been listed as "in range" for two fucking years, despite me trying -- two years ago -- and being out of range. They've finally moved us to "out of range".

Which probably means nothing, but I can't help but wonder if the reason I'm still out of range had to do with "not being on the upgrade/booster list" because they firmly believed my area was set already.

So I can hope that now that my little area is properly listed as "fucked", upgrading the area might actually land on their 'to do' list.

I think Chimpy's right on the problem -- 30+ year old neighborhood, I bet the circuits aren't routed in even a semi-efficient manner.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 14, 2010, 09:09:08 AM
Oh it is probably very efficient - for phones. Running one 25 pair cable and tapping it every couple of houses is infinitely more efficient than running 2pairs from the CO to each house in as short a distance as possible. And in many cases, the way it is routed (while maybe not great for DSL) may BE the shortest route they had available.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 14, 2010, 12:26:53 PM
I have a ASUS RT-N12 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833320039) wireless router. Two odd things.

1) Wireless seems flaky. Every few hours it will drop connection and I have to disable/enable the adapter on the pc to get a connection again. Wired connection is solid.

2) Wired speed is about 20% of the wireless speed?
This shit, still happening. I've been using the wire for stability in gaming, the wireless for downloading speed. Last thing I feel like dicking around with when I get home from dealing with tech shit all day is more tech shit. It's partly why I love my fucking woodpile and axe so much.

Anyway, per Chimpy: drivers are up to date and ipv6 is now off on the wireless adapter.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on December 14, 2010, 09:31:02 PM
I'm using a new Mac Book Pro with 4gigs of ram, and the Nvidia 330M, i7 and was wondering what kind of frame-rate reduction I would take if I set up my 30inch HDTV as a second monitor? Id really only use it to play WoW on, which seems to run fine at really high settings. Really im just seeing if it's worth spending the $30 for the HDMI adaptor cable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 14, 2010, 10:02:52 PM
I suspect it would be fine. Remember, TVs have really low resolutions, so its not that big a deal. In fact, I suspect your laptop has a higher resolution than your TV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on December 14, 2010, 10:50:32 PM
I suspect it would be fine. Remember, TVs have really low resolutions, so its not that big a deal. In fact, I suspect your laptop has a higher resolution than your TV.

I suppose I just ignorantly assumed that since it had to project over a larger space, that it would eat up more processing power.
Reading that sentence I suppose I am retarded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 15, 2010, 12:31:31 AM
I suspect it would be fine. Remember, TVs have really low resolutions, so its not that big a deal. In fact, I suspect your laptop has a higher resolution than your TV.
No they don't unless he has a 17" MacBook Pro. If it's a 1080p HDTV that's 1920 x 1080. 720p is 1280 x 720. 13" MacBook Pro is 1280 x 800 native, 15" is 1440 x 900, 17" is 1920 x 1200.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 15, 2010, 12:56:59 AM
Is your notebook capable of running 2x or greater FSAA in WoW?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on December 15, 2010, 06:16:48 PM
I suspect it would be fine. Remember, TVs have really low resolutions, so its not that big a deal. In fact, I suspect your laptop has a higher resolution than your TV.
No they don't unless he has a 17" MacBook Pro. If it's a 1080p HDTV that's 1920 x 1080. 720p is 1280 x 720. 13" MacBook Pro is 1280 x 800 native, 15" is 1440 x 900, 17" is 1920 x 1200.


I actually do have the 17inch, and I'm pretty sure Im running 8xFSAA, I'm not sure what the UI option is for that in the video tab though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 15, 2010, 06:39:31 PM
So that's easy then. If it runs fine on the laptop display it'll run essentially the same on a 1080p TV and with a higher frame rate on a 720p TV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 15, 2010, 08:36:29 PM
Also, FSAA is for all intents and purposes downsampling a screen drawn at a higher resolution, so there's that too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 29, 2010, 10:10:43 AM
Anyone have a preferred piece of equipment that can act as a wireless bridge?  I guess you need internet access to your direct tv box to order on demand items (unless you want to call every time).  BTW is it normal for the AT&T installers to not do any of this shit?  They pretty much just made the wireless router hot and hooked up the satellite then left, they did not configure the mail clients or make sure the satellite receiver had internet access for the aforementioned on demand ordering.

Personally I never let the cable guy touch my shit but leaving it all in the hands of my 70 year old parents with the comment that it is so easy an 11 year old could do it doesn't seem like the best customer service model available.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Brolan on December 29, 2010, 11:45:18 AM
I got an upgrade question.  I've got a computer that I would to play games at the highest graphic settings.  It does pretty well for a 2 and half year box, but I'm not sure what to upgrade first.  I only have $200 spare dollars right now.

Here is how it looks now:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Windsor 2.6GHz Socket AM2 89W Dual-Core
Crucial Ballistix 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)
ASUS M2N-E AM2 NVIDIA nForce 570 Ultra MCP ATX AMD Motherboard
EVGA 320-P2-N815-AR GeForce 8800GTS 320MB 320-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 Video Card
ENERMAX EG495AX-VE FMA 485W ATX12V Power Supply

What do you think?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 29, 2010, 12:09:15 PM
I'd say a 1GB 460gtx but you're also hurting for RAM. If you expect to spend $200 to play games on the highest graphic settings, invest in some weed instead.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on December 29, 2010, 12:09:54 PM
lolz!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 29, 2010, 12:31:02 PM
I'd say a 1GB 460gtx but you're also hurting for RAM. I'd say if you expect to spend $200 to play games on the highest graphic settings, invest in some weed instead.

Joking aside, I'm gonna concur with Sky here. Your system needs a full overhaul. You could get an upgraded vid card, but it would bottleneck with your current CPU. Your ram's also a bit tight for most games coming out right now. I would hang tight, save some money, and then get a new system. With the new line of Intel CPUs coming out, there's probably going to be a price drop in current i5s and i7s on the 1156 chipsets. We picked up a Gigabyte motherboard, i5 750 cpu, 4 gb corsair ram & gold standard Seasonic psu for 700 bucks, and that was a few months back. You'll probably be able to get the same within a few months for around 500 to 600.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 29, 2010, 12:40:59 PM
A 460 might be bottlenecked, but it would give a small speed boost and be portable to a new system. That was my thinking in getting mine (well, really it was more that my 8800gtx died). The RAM would probably not carry forward as well, though. I'm also eying prices on the i5 750, 4GB, mobo for an upgrade, possibly to SLI the 460 next xmas.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Brolan on December 29, 2010, 05:21:29 PM
Actually as I said before this system does a pretty good job, so I don't think its time to trash everything and start over.   

Adding another 2 gigs of memory is cheap so I might go with that for now.  Then I can update the video card later as that can be reused in a new system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 29, 2010, 06:27:45 PM
Anyone have a preferred piece of equipment that can act as a wireless bridge?  I guess you need internet access to your direct tv box to order on demand items (unless you want to call every time).  BTW is it normal for the AT&T installers to not do any of this shit?  They pretty much just made the wireless router hot and hooked up the satellite then left, they did not configure the mail clients or make sure the satellite receiver had internet access for the aforementioned on demand ordering.

Personally I never let the cable guy touch my shit but leaving it all in the hands of my 70 year old parents with the comment that it is so easy an 11 year old could do it doesn't seem like the best customer service model available.

You probably want to go to the DDWRT forums and find which routers work with their firmware, then buy 2 of those and flash them and turn them into bridges. There are a lot of cheap devices that will take DDWRT.

But honestly, less hassle and fuss if you just buy enough cat5 cable and hard wire it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 29, 2010, 09:45:01 PM
I'm also eying prices on the i5 750, 4GB, mobo for an upgrade, possibly to SLI the 460 next xmas.

The i5 760 is the new beast.  It's pretty much the same deal with higher stock clocks, and the price difference is marginal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 29, 2010, 11:25:10 PM
I blame Engels.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 29, 2010, 11:37:11 PM
again!?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 30, 2010, 07:59:46 AM
The i5 760 is the new beast.

I have one of these on my desk in front of me.

Win7 question: I'm building a new rig and traditionally I just transplanted the hard drives into the new system and went on my way.  Since I haven't the time or inclination to experiment or read books about a OS that I am not paid to support, I wanted to ask if this is a good idea or do I just need to do a fresh install?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on December 30, 2010, 08:44:12 AM
Fresh install, I've had 2 people turn to me so far when just moving over the drive win 7 drive with a new motherboard. It seemed to work marginally (occasional bsod) for a while, but over time the amount of bsods increased. Had one guy drive his computer from Phoenix to Denver this summer for me to fix.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 30, 2010, 08:52:22 AM
During a manual installation of Windows 7, the installer puts in a gob load of registry entries specific to the hardware you're using. The motherboard, as you can imagine, isn't just one piece of hardware; it has dozens of individual components that need to be identified by the installation routine.

When you slap a hard drive into new motherboard, Windows 7 does its best to identify the new hardware, and more often than not these days there's enough software lying about in the Windows 7 driver repository to launch the OS to desktop.

From here, however, one would still want to install the drivers that came with the new motherboard by hand.

After that, make sure you've uninstalled all the old motherboard specific drivers/programs using the 'uninstallers' in Control Panel > Programs.

Finally, I'd try to find and remove the old registry entries created by the old hardware by running CCleaner's registry fixer.

You may be ok then, but again, its no guarantee.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 30, 2010, 09:06:47 AM
Sounds like a reinstall.  Maybe a good excuse to get a SSD for the OS.  I can get the new machine mostly built and then move over my hard drives, perhaps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on December 31, 2010, 09:56:52 PM
Well, when I installed Win 7 over XP (kept my HDD), it left my data alone.  A reinstall is pretty low risk/hassle.

But yah, get the SSD.  I would.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on January 01, 2011, 06:53:13 PM
Computer has locked up flashing bios on my laptop. Nothing doing at all. At stage of verifying block 9 of 32. What should I do?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 01, 2011, 07:42:56 PM
Wait, the block being verified is on the ROM of your BIOS? Will it boot at all? Or just 'dead'? If the latter, then could there be a bios reset jumper on your laptop's motherboard? May try that if its not booting at all, but if the ROM flash process got permanently and irrecoverably corrupted, its beyond my level of expertise.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on January 01, 2011, 08:30:09 PM
Wait, the block being verified is on the ROM of your BIOS? Will it boot at all? Or just 'dead'? If the latter, then could there be a bios reset jumper on your laptop's motherboard? May try that if its not booting at all, but if the ROM flash process got permanently and irrecoverably corrupted, its beyond my level of expertise.

I don't know really, I'm a bit daft to be doing this. Hard reset the computer and it seems to have booted so mayhaps I've survived.  Though it's hanging again but that is prob another issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 01, 2011, 10:14:58 PM
I asked because 'blocks' are normally associated with a failing hard drive, not a BIOS flash, but it may be referring to ROM 'flashable' blocks/sectors/whathaveyou.

If you saw your machine boot and then run into a disk check and it reported bad blocks, then I'd recommend backing up your data asap. Disk failures like that tend to cascade fast into utter unreadability. Then its time to get a new hard drive, and reinstall everything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on January 01, 2011, 10:34:52 PM
I asked because 'blocks' are normally associated with a failing hard drive, not a BIOS flash, but it may be referring to ROM 'flashable' blocks/sectors/whathaveyou.

If you saw your machine boot and then run into a disk check and it reported bad blocks, then I'd recommend backing up your data asap. Disk failures like that tend to cascade fast into utter unreadability. Then its time to get a new hard drive, and reinstall everything.

Hmm. Well I was voluntarily updating the BIOS and the computer just locked up completely halfway through. It managed to work when I reset it via taking out the battery, and the BIOS version now says it's the one I was attempting to update it to. So I guess I will just eave it as it is now and if it fails later on so be it. All my important stuff is backed up normally.

Thanks for the help.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 01, 2011, 10:53:53 PM
Good to hear. I have sometimes flashed a rom and it takes a bit to read it at first boot, specially with dells. Glad that taking out the battery fixed it/knocked it back into place.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 02, 2011, 03:16:50 AM
Anyone have a preferred piece of equipment that can act as a wireless bridge?  I guess you need internet access to your direct tv box to order on demand items (unless you want to call every time).  BTW is it normal for the AT&T installers to not do any of this shit?  They pretty much just made the wireless router hot and hooked up the satellite then left, they did not configure the mail clients or make sure the satellite receiver had internet access for the aforementioned on demand ordering.

Personally I never let the cable guy touch my shit but leaving it all in the hands of my 70 year old parents with the comment that it is so easy an 11 year old could do it doesn't seem like the best customer service model available.

You probably want to go to the DDWRT forums and find which routers work with their firmware, then buy 2 of those and flash them and turn them into bridges. There are a lot of cheap devices that will take DDWRT.

But honestly, less hassle and fuss if you just buy enough cat5 cable and hard wire it.

I ended up trying out a wireless adapter which worked fine for the laptop but when I tried switching it over to the DirecTV box it wouldn't work.  Ran out of time messing with other stuff so I will probably just hardwire it in a few months when I am next out that way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 06, 2011, 03:40:26 PM
I didn't want to make a thread to ask this since it's just kind a general tech question....

Either Comcast or Bellsouth is running new fiber just outside of our neighborhood and they have some decent sized canisters of nitrogen at different points.  What's the nitrogen used for?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 07, 2011, 12:40:04 AM
Purging subterranean lines probably.  Maybe welding if they're using one of the processes that require inert gas.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 13, 2011, 10:59:37 AM
Question -- sadly this is for Vista:

The hard drive in my wife's laptop decided to eat itself again. While probably repairable (the issue was a bad block somewhere in the OS or boot area. I couldn't even get chkdsk to work, it'd cancel itself even on autorun at startup) since it'd still boot and work, just badly, I've had such problems with her drive that I just up and bought a new one.

I reloaded Vista (shudder), office, built her new profiles, and attached her old drive via a USB drive enclosure to snag her data and port it into her new profiles. I managed to get all the important data out of her user profiles, but ran into a PITA permission issue.

I finally managed to get access to everything I need and get it to copy, but only after a long and painful process of explitly taking ownership of the folder and all it's children and files, then granting myself total permission (as administrator on her computer). Is that the only way to do it, or did I miss something simple?

Because I can't really understand why a drive I have slaved to the laptop, of which I am an administrator, was locked off from me to begin with. (I think that's my old Unix stuff saying "You're root. If it's connected, you can do whatever the fuck you want with it).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 13, 2011, 11:11:08 AM
Question -- sadly this is for Vista:
<snipped>

I think I recall that in Vista the Administrator account is disabled by default and has to be explicitly enabled.  I don't think that if you just add yourself to the administrators group you get the same level of access...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 13, 2011, 02:40:23 PM
I think I recall that in Vista the Administrator account is disabled by default and has to be explicitly enabled.  I don't think that if you just add yourself to the administrators group you get the same level of access...
I booted it in safe mood, hooked up the drive, planted my flag via Ownership, and declared that all the Hard Drive belonged to me. Strangely, it still refused me access to some of the boot files. However, the Users directory fell beneath my awesome mouse-clicking powers.

Nonetheless, it was a real pain.

I can understand Microsoft's security goals, and their absolute and justified fears of what casual users would do if they could (for instance) find the registry, but jesus.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 13, 2011, 02:50:57 PM
Just plugging a drive into a machine doesn't do anything to change the permissions on the files that are already on it - those are explicitly assigned to the administrator account et. al. on the other machine. It might have worked if you used the exact same machine name, I've never tried that, but I suspect that the SIDs would still be wrong. It isn't a security paranoia thing, that's just how NTFS works.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 13, 2011, 03:04:51 PM
Just plugging a drive into a machine doesn't do anything to change the permissions on the files that are already on it - those are explicitly assigned to the administrator account et. al. on the other machine. It might have worked if you used the exact same machine name, I've never tried that, but I suspect that the SIDs would still be wrong. It isn't a security paranoia thing, that's just how NTFS works.
It doesn't. The SIDs are different, even with the same machine name. (It does, however, make it a bit tricky to determine which machinename/user account you're assigning permissions with). I was replacing her drive, so I kept the name and user account names, which was a bit tricky. :)

My complaint was more that there simply wasn't a way to brute force ownership of the drive -- the equivilant of an override or something. Like I said, I tend to think of "Administrator' as 'root' which to me means that I automatically have permissions for everything. I can theoretically understand why it's done the way it's done, it just caused me a lot of grief doing it. In my head, hooking up the drive means the new OS should own it's ass. (And technically does, since the OS can declare itself owner of the drive. Making me explicitly do it, however, instead of just saying 'You are in admin mode, this is a hard drive access via the OS you are admin of, everything is open to you" was obnoxious.

I can see the security reasons behind it. Doesn't make it any less obnoxious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 13, 2011, 07:50:18 PM
You have to brute-force it as far as I've ever been able to find.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Brolan on January 16, 2011, 01:31:46 PM
I think I recall that in Vista the Administrator account is disabled by default and has to be explicitly enabled.  I don't think that if you just add yourself to the administrators group you get the same level of access...
I booted it in safe mood, hooked up the drive, planted my flag via Ownership, and declared that all the Hard Drive belonged to me. Strangely, it still refused me access to some of the boot files. However, the Users directory fell beneath my awesome mouse-clicking powers.

Nonetheless, it was a real pain.

I can understand Microsoft's security goals, and their absolute and justified fears of what casual users would do if they could (for instance) find the registry, but jesus.

If Microsoft built cars it would be a 12-step process to open the hood.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 16, 2011, 03:43:19 PM
This isn't the thread for "lulz I h8 M$ 'cause I wear a beret."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on January 16, 2011, 11:40:42 PM
Newb question time.  How do these speakers attach to my PC?  My system has onboard sound, simple setup.  I've used stock cheapo 3.5mm jack speakers for the longest time and I'm looking to take it up a notch.  

Can they simply hook directly into the 3.5mm on my MB, or does it need other hardware?  Thanks!

http://www.amazon.com/M-Audio-Studiophile-AV-Powered-Speakers/dp/B000MUXJCO/ref=dp_cp_ob_e_title_1

They will most likely have either an RCA connector on the back for left-right or a TRS jack of some size. All you will need is an adapter.

While I love me some M-Audio (and I love me some studio monitors), I have been very happy with my Alesis M1Acitve 320USB speakers which are about half the price. LINK (http://www.amazon.com/Alesis-M1Active-Studio-Monitor-Pair/dp/B0011Z87I0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=musical-instruments&qid=1291996012&sr=1-1)

My 10yr old speakers finally died.  They're popping and all sorts, a bad connection somewhere and I don't feel like fixing what I don't like anyways. 

Are there any speakers out that are good in the sub-$50 range?  I suppose I could do those Alesis, but hoping to get the price down.  Don't need a subwoofer set, though I have been listening to a lot more music on my system lately.  Onboard sound.  Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 19, 2011, 12:14:41 PM
My 2007 Mitsubishi TV is dying.  Not so suddenly that I can grieve and get over it with a replacement, however this gives me time to carefully consider a purchase.  It occurs to me that maybe Mitsubishi makes shit TVs but they also make very thin frame TVs.  Searching for thin frame TVs makes my brain baby kick, and besides this the first thing I find is a Mitsubishi.  The determining spec is "less than 48 inches wide" and ideally "exactly 48 inches wide".  I suppose my question is: anyone have a Mitsubishi TV that has lasted longer than three years?  It looks good on paper.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 19, 2011, 01:02:14 PM
Is there even a way to search for a TV by total width, other than hitting the stores with a tape measure or manually navigating your way through hundreds of manufacturer specs online?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 19, 2011, 01:06:52 PM
Not on Amazon, and any sort of measurement in a Google search gets hits on the diagonal.

Mathematics tells me that it cannot possibly have a diagonal longer than 55 even if there was no frame.  Past history tells me that if I downgrade from a 52 to anything under 50, I'm liable to spend lots of time stewing in a pool of hate.

I'm also pretending that I actually have the money for this.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 20, 2011, 08:02:29 AM
Is depth an issue as well, or are you just talking about a thin bezel? The Mitsu DLP I have has about a half inch bezel. I never realized how large the Samsung's bezel was until I got this set, it's almost all screen. It's less than a year old, though, so no word on reliability.

What exactly is 'dying'?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 21, 2011, 06:28:52 AM
There are vertical lines of LCDs that don't twist.  The first ones appeared on the right edge so I was pretending they did not exist.  A few months ago, one appeared in the center.  These all go away eventually if you leave the TV on long enough.  Then this week I notice some minuscule color artifacts in a band on the left side.  Difficult to see, but at first I thought my PS3 was dying again and my eyes got red.  In any case, I don't expect these issues to get better over time.

From my brief searches, if you need a thin bezel then you have to get a Mitsubishi.  My problem is that I have a large cabinet system built into the wall and the opening for the TV is 48 inches wide.  This is very deep, designed in 2002 when CRTs ruled the fern-laden swamps, and it even opens into the room behind so depth is not an issue.  Having the TV jut out from the opening, if it's more than 48" wide, has been kiboshed by the wife, but I'm keeping this idea in my back pocket for when she is dead and/or gone.  Looking at TV reviews, I see brands such as Sony and Samsung, not Mitsu, getting high marks.  My decision is then to either get a smaller screen size of a different brand, or get a Mitsu and cross my fingers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 21, 2011, 07:35:51 AM
I can't even push you to DLP (though it would make a lot of sense given your criteria), because Mitsubishi's smallest DLP is a 60". Dammit.

Even though I have a Mitsu DLP, the Samsung was much better build quality.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on January 24, 2011, 08:56:28 AM
Anyone got advice on a good, cheap router?  Updating my network at home since most components are fairly old including a cable modem that I can't even remember when I bought it (already found one).   This router has to be around 7 years old as well.

Devices on the network are my PC (wired), two consoles (wireless), iphone, ipad, and at most 2 notebooks on the wireless.

Seems like every router on newegg has someone bitching about it.  50% seem like people too retarded to set it up and the other 50% seem like geniune defective merchandise.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 24, 2011, 09:56:09 AM
I've got this one, from a link in a thread here somewhere: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833320039

It's not the most solid wireless connection but it's fast. The wired connection is solid, but slow. No idea why, very frustrating. I'm not sure if I'm recommending it or not, heh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on January 24, 2011, 01:20:43 PM
Is going to wireless N or gigabit ethernet going to make much a difference in the set up I've mentioned above?  ISP is Comcast.

edit: I suppose the iPad and other current and future iPhones could use the wireless n.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 24, 2011, 01:33:58 PM
N should be backwards compatible, yeah?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on January 24, 2011, 01:42:44 PM
Most anything that says n says a/b/g/n.  Not worried about that really. 

Most new routers seem to have a lot of gripes.  The only router people seem to love is the Linksys WRT54GL.  I have one but it's old as dirt and starting to act up.  It's g, not n, which is why I'm wondering if n will do noticeably better with our mobile devices.

I just know pretty much zilch about networking other than the basic stuff and zoning (which is non applicable at home).  Reading up as best as I can while disks format at work.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 24, 2011, 03:32:42 PM
In general it's better to get dual band 2.4 GHz/5 GHz router in a mixed G/N environment. That way the newer devices like the iPad using N won't be stuck at slower speeds cause you have the PS3 and Xbox 360 hooked up through G. If you don't do much device-to-device transfers over wireless (e.g. laptop to laptop), however, then it doesn't matter that much as even at G speeds the wireless speed should still be faster than your Comcast connection itself.

Gigabit Ethernet only matters if you have multiple devices wired that support it. If you only ever have the single PC wired then it doesn't matter if the router only has Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps). However, if you wanted to hook up one of the laptops and transfer large amounts of files back and forth you might want to consider spending the extra money to get a router with Gigabit Ethernet.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on January 24, 2011, 04:11:49 PM
I've been looking for a router as well since my wireless seems to be taking poops in the bed of late.  The opinion of the massive thread over at SA says the preferred router of choice is the WRT54GL.  But that seems to be based on the ability for the really smart people to install different firmware and all the fun that it allows (whatever that may be).  I just want something that's fast, reliable, works, and is pretty idiot proof.  The newegg reviews are overtly positive (3K reviews, 5 stars), so I'll probably pick one up soon.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 26, 2011, 10:58:33 AM
What can I do to find out which process is causing my disk churn?  (Win vista)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Xilren's Twin on January 26, 2011, 06:31:43 PM
What programs (ideally free) do people use to compress and/or link fraps videos into something less gi-normus?  One of my boys wants to play around with gameplay videos.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 26, 2011, 08:54:30 PM
What programs (ideally free) do people use to compress and/or link fraps videos into something less gi-normus?  One of my boys wants to play around with gameplay videos.

I would use ffmpeg as it can do the conversion while streaming, but it is a command line tool with shit for documentation and decent tutorials on it are a bit hard to find.  A few of the gui based tools use ffmpeg on the back end to do the work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 27, 2011, 09:20:17 PM
What can I do to find out which process is causing my disk churn?  (Win vista)

Not 100% on Vista, but Process Monitor from Sysinternals might do what you want.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 27, 2011, 09:31:08 PM
I've been looking for a router as well since my wireless seems to be taking poops in the bed of late.  The opinion of the massive thread over at SA says the preferred router of choice is the WRT54GL.  But that seems to be based on the ability for the really smart people to install different firmware and all the fun that it allows (whatever that may be).  I just want something that's fast, reliable, works, and is pretty idiot proof.  The newegg reviews are overtly positive (3K reviews, 5 stars), so I'll probably pick one up soon.

The WRT54G in general is a pretty decent router for home use. And while the super-nerdy hacker types all buy the GL to be able to flash it with DD-WRT, the built in firmware is actually pretty damn solid and does pretty much all the same things.

A big rule of thumb is: stay the hell away from Belkin routers.

Wireless n is NOT backwards compatible with b/g (though it is with a) as n is 5ghz and b/g are 2.4. You want to make sure that if you do have n and g devices you want to connect at the same time, that you buy a router that can have both radios on at the same time (most of the lower priced ones are one or the other, set in the control panel).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 27, 2011, 09:38:05 PM
N can run at 2.4 GHz too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 28, 2011, 08:29:07 AM
What can I do to find out which process is causing my disk churn?  (Win vista)

Not 100% on Vista, but Process Monitor from Sysinternals might do what you want.

Possibly a simpler method is to bring up the Task Manager (right click on your task bar) and then under the View menu choose Select Columns and find I/O Reads and I/O writes. Those two tend to be two good indicators of what's doing what to your hd under the Processes column.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 28, 2011, 10:05:25 AM
What can I do to find out which process is causing my disk churn?  (Win vista)

Not 100% on Vista, but Process Monitor from Sysinternals might do what you want.

Possibly a simpler method is to bring up the Task Manager (right click on your task bar) and then under the View menu choose Select Columns and find I/O Reads and I/O writes. Those two tend to be two good indicators of what's doing what to your hd under the Processes column.

Yea that too, assumed he had tried this.  I have replaced my taskman with process explorer and do the same.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 07, 2011, 04:28:06 PM
Anyone able to describe what a LCD generally looks like when it is dying? Viewsonic display was freaking out while playing ToEE (not exactly tough on the video card). Wasn't sure if it was the video card, so I activated my dual display, which is connected to the TV - monitor was freaking out, while the TV display was fine.

Wasn't sure if it was a port on the card, so I reconnected the monitor and it's fine now...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 07, 2011, 06:22:43 PM
What's the latest and greatest on SSDs?  Are they coming down in price soon (next 3 months) or have the hit their price/GB mark for a while?  I want one for no other reason than to just to have one, preferably in the 250GB range to store multiple games/MMOs on, but don't want to just toss money at it willy nilly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on February 08, 2011, 07:33:52 AM
What's the latest and greatest on SSDs?  Are they coming down in price soon (next 3 months) or have the hit their price/GB mark for a while?  I want one for no other reason than to just to have one, preferably in the 250GB range to store multiple games/MMOs on, but don't want to just toss money at it willy nilly.

Anything Sandforce SF-1200 series based controllers are the latest and greatest. The next revision of the Intel SSD's are suppose to be out this month so i'd hold out for a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 08, 2011, 07:38:32 AM
Yeesh, they're still about 500 USD for something in the 250GB range.  Think I'll pass until the $/GB ratio isn't so out of whack.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 08, 2011, 08:43:31 AM
Anyone able to describe what a LCD generally looks like when it is dying? Viewsonic display was freaking out while playing ToEE (not exactly tough on the video card). Wasn't sure if it was the video card, so I activated my dual display, which is connected to the TV - monitor was freaking out, while the TV display was fine.
For the monitor of mine which went bad it was flickering and a general dimness.  Usually I was able to get it working by powering it off then on after it warmed up a bit, but it got worse and worse with time.  I've seen another one exhibit similar symptoms, but they are much more minor and it's still in use for a year since it started.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 08, 2011, 02:37:44 PM
I happened again last night, but is fine at the moment. Seems to be intermittent, sometimes temporarily fixed by reseating the DVI cable.

I'm tempted to try another cable before taking the plunge on a new monitor...one that has to make its way to Africa this year. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 08, 2011, 03:31:13 PM
What's the latest and greatest on SSDs?  Are they coming down in price soon (next 3 months) or have the hit their price/GB mark for a while?  I want one for no other reason than to just to have one, preferably in the 250GB range to store multiple games/MMOs on, but don't want to just toss money at it willy nilly.

Anything Sandforce SF-1200 series based controllers are the latest and greatest. The next revision of the Intel SSD's are suppose to be out this month so i'd hold out for a bit.

The 25nm g3 Intel ssd's were supposed to hit in q1 of this year and almost double the gb per $, unfortunately intel just pulled a switch and is now going to release the previously unannounced 510 series ssd which is more or less the same $/gb but offer SATA 3 and sandforce speeds using the existing 34nm chips.  I can't help but think this will push back the 25nm drives by another quarter or 2, especially considering the rumored 1/3 lifespan they are currently experiencing (3k writes/cell vs 10k writes/cell).

Edit: by "same $/gb" I mean same as is currently offered not same as the upcoming g3's with double capacity per $.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on February 10, 2011, 09:15:23 AM
On my 23" LCD monitor exactly half of the screen looks correct and half is noticeably brighter (there's a clear divide).  All searches seem to indicate that my monitor is toast.  Is this a safe assumption?

Through an act of generosity I don't have a backup to test if it's the card, although I really doubt that'd be the case. I'll try to rule out the cable tonight, but I'm expecting that not to matter as well.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 10, 2011, 06:58:07 PM
Memory is fuzzy, but I seem to recall that some if not all video cards do partial screen renderings, half and half. I'd see if you can get your hands on a laptop and use a vga cable to test the monitor before drawing any conclusions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on February 11, 2011, 08:50:29 PM
Memory is fuzzy, but I seem to recall that some if not all video cards do partial screen renderings, half and half. I'd see if you can get your hands on a laptop and use a vga cable to test the monitor before drawing any conclusions.

Did this just a few minutes ago.  It's the monitor. 

I'm going to blame my cat that tends to sleep right in front of it when I'm not around. Next monitor is going to have a nice strip of dual sided tape on the desk in front of it and in back.  HAVE FUN LAYING IN THAT, YOU FUZZY BASTARD.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 12, 2011, 08:51:38 AM
Really? You think it was the cat's fault? Or are there just no other rational explanations?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 12, 2011, 10:12:36 AM
I hate cats, so blaming it for monitor woes seems right by me.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 12, 2011, 10:34:32 AM
Anyone have a recommendation for a wall mounted keyboard tray/arm that doesn't cost a fortune?  I just bought the monitor version of this ergotron arm (http://www.provantage.com/ergotron-45-246-026~7ERGT0K7.htm) but am not overly keen on spending $185 on the keyboard version.  I am really pleased with the ergotron monitor arm but that was $50 cheaper than the keyboard version and actually is useful beyond the exercise bike.

I am trying to get a setup where I can swing my monitor around to the recumbent exercise bike (next to my desk) and get something that will support my keyboard and mouse in a usable position while sitting there...  The keyboard tray doesn't need to necessarily be usable at the desk position as my keyboard and mouse are wireless and I can just move them to my desk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 14, 2011, 06:29:47 AM
On the subject of monitors...

I've been looking hard at the Dell U2410 (IPS) or the Asus VG236H (TN, 120Hz, 3D Ready).  I'm in a bit of a dilemma. 

I won't need the color clarity of the Dell because I don't do any photo/video editing, but I understand the picture is quite stunning.
I won't need the 3D capability of the Asus, but the reviews for gaming are through the roof and (for a TN panel) the picture is also amazing.  Not quite as good as the Dell, but as good as a TN panel gets.

They're both within ~100 bucks of each other, so the price isn't really the issue.  But for someone that will use the monitor for 99 percent gaming and the majority of THAT time spent playing MMOs, what would you recommend?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 14, 2011, 06:51:02 AM
Dell Ultrasharps are damn good monitors.

I don't really think you can go wrong with one. If the Asus is more expensive I don't think there would be a question if you are not interested in 3d.

I have a friend that has used them for gaming for years (from his office /shakefist) and never heard a complaint.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 14, 2011, 06:57:44 AM
With a Dell coupon, I can get the U2410 for 450ish.  I can get the Asus (w/o the 3D gear) for 349.00ish.  I mean...Yeah, a 100 bucks is a 100 bucks, but in the grand scheme of things in terms of 4 plus years of use out of it, it's no real bid deal.

There's nothing technically wrong with my current monitor (Gateway FHD2400), but the backlight bleed and color shifting if I move my head 2 inches is finally getting annoying after 3 or 4 years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on February 14, 2011, 07:56:39 AM
I have the Dell U23 and I love it. Picture is sharp and clear, no weird light patterns like my cheap Viewsonic. And it looks exactly the same at a 10 degree viewing angle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 14, 2011, 09:52:33 AM
WoW works really well with 3D Vision, so did EQ2.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 14, 2011, 10:32:51 PM
Another consideration with IPS is video picture quality. If you do any movie viewing, IPS is nicer than TN, and not only for the viewing angle. TN tends to do blacks and greys  in splotches, whereas IPS blends darker shades well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 15, 2011, 03:05:26 PM
So speaking of monitors, my ViewSonic appears to be crapping out. The display routed to my TV is fine, I've replaced the cable, so I think that only leaves the monitor that is a number of years old.

Any suggestions? I'd rather hang somewhere around the $250 range or so. Used primarily for gaming and web browsing, no video or image editing to consider.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 15, 2011, 07:30:10 PM
I'd find a Dell model that you like, find out who the OEM was, and buy that model.  Fuck Dell and their marvelous selection of rebranded monitors.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 15, 2011, 07:34:44 PM
Where do you even go to look at Dell monitors?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 15, 2011, 08:16:46 PM
Where do you even go to look at Dell monitors?

Best Buy and a few other stores sell some models now. But other than that, the UltraSharps are really good (and usually price competitive with equal quality displays).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 15, 2011, 08:27:21 PM
I like Dell branded monitors.  I'm looking at one right now.  But shit like this (http://www.allpinouts.org/index.php/Dell_Dimension_8100_Power_Supply) means I'm not buying another Dell, even if they claim to have mended their ways. [/herfderf]

For reference. (http://www.allpinouts.org/index.php/ATX_-_BTX_Motherboard_Power_-_24_Pin_%28ver._2.x%29)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 15, 2011, 08:54:31 PM
...Wat?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 16, 2011, 07:12:01 AM
Yeah, I'm scratching my head at that one too


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on February 16, 2011, 07:38:03 AM
He's referencing in the power supply pin-outs that dell use to do. It was common in their pre Intel Core based computers to have a totally messed up connection. The Dell 24pins are pinned out differently vs a standard ATX/BTX 20+4 yet the molex is keyed the same so you'd probably break things by using a standard PSU. 3rd parties even started making ATX -> Dell converters (http://www.endpcnoise.com/cgi-bin/e/std/sku=dellconverter).

But yea totally weird for a conversation on monitors, comparing a 7+ year old PSU practice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 16, 2011, 09:29:31 AM
Yeah, I'm saying that Dell's business practices have historically been shitty.  Do with that information what you like.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 16, 2011, 10:58:44 AM
Yeah, I'm saying that Dell's business practices have historically been shitty.  Do with that information what you like.

You buy a computer from any large OEM (Dell, Lenovo, HP, Acer) and you are going to get stuff that is proprietary. Just open up a damn Dell case with all the weird mounting brackets etc and it is obvious they are doing stuff that is not interchangeable with off the shelf homebuilder stuff. Half of them put the board in on the opposite side so add-on cards don't fit the same too. It is the S.O.P. going back since the beginning of the computer industry.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 16, 2011, 01:10:34 PM
Proprietary isn't the issue as long as it isn't particularly egregious.  Booby trapping your own machines is.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 16, 2011, 05:10:33 PM
Any recommended blu ray burning software?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on February 16, 2011, 06:00:32 PM
Proprietary isn't the issue as long as it isn't particularly egregious.  Booby trapping your own machines is.

Dell desktop line has been pretty standard now for the past 5 years. At work I deal with quite a few of their desktop lines and the only custom parts in the last while are the case/motherboards/bios. They shifted to using a BTX layout at the time of the P4 to combat heat inside the chassis and there's no way an ATX motherboard will fix inside their case. Recently most of the systems are headed to a pure ATX layout, take a look at the mainstream Inspiron (http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/insp560mt/en/sm/techov.htm#wp1200202) / Vostro (http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/vos230/en/sm/MT/sysbd_diagram.htm) / XPS (http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/studio9100/en/sm/techov.htm#wp1194395) lines. The last truly custom part on a mainstream midtower consumer computer is the case which has the molded I/O shield.

If your going to hold a grudge against Dell for the PSU practice you have to lump HP/Compaq and almost any OEM because they all did custom power supplies. Early to mid 2000 Dell wised up and decided to go standard ATX high efficiency and reliable PSU's.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 16, 2011, 11:11:53 PM
Seriously. An 11 year old grudge for the PSU issues of yesteryear seems a poor decision. There are other, valid reasons not to get a dell, but they are the same reasons not to get any prefab OEM brand.

As to Dell monitors, in particular the ultrasharps, is it really a matter of figuring out who makes the panel and seeing what other brands use that panel? I know that its the case with some TN stuff, but I do wonder if the IPS stuff is available elsewhere, at a lower price.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 17, 2011, 11:46:07 AM
Seriously. An 11 year old grudge for the PSU issues of yesteryear seems a poor decision.

Given that the ATX connector that is not an ATX connector cost me a PSU and a motherboard I'd say I made the right call.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 17, 2011, 01:51:28 PM
So what are the key things one should be looking for in a new gaming monitor? Looking to buy a 22"-24", color quality doesn't need to be super duper fantastic with great view angle consistency. I haven't bought a monitor retail in about 10 years, so not really sure what makes a monitor good or decent, or when enough is enough?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 17, 2011, 08:13:15 PM
Go to a store and look at some monitors.  For certain you should try and get a look at a comparable IPS and TN panel side-by-side.

Buy something you're comfortable looking at (size-wise) if it's sitting on your desk.  These days resolution should be 1980x1080.  Response time and contrast are often cooked numbers and therefore of dubious use as a point of comparison.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 18, 2011, 09:35:29 AM
Its somewhat true that the numbers can be 'bent' to seem more favorable, particularly in regards to response times and view angle.

Strazos, I'd look at Asus and Samsung for good gaming monitors. Since color fidelity, photo and video are not your top priority, you have essentially taken away the top three things that make monitors expensive. Now that that's out of the way, go look at monitors in stores, read new egg reviews on them for such things as dead pixel reports and other manufacturing problems.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 18, 2011, 02:23:23 PM
Went and looked at Best Buy today (which sucked by the way, the placards didn't tell much), which was not terribly informative, especially since video was mostly not running at all. However, figured out that Samsung, LG, and Asus looked the best.

Pretty much narrowed down to these three:

(not seen in-person) http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-9334 (http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-9334)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=24-236-049&SortField=0&SummaryType=0&PageSize=10&SelectedRating=-1&VideoOnlyMark=False&IsFeedbackTab=true#scrollFullInfo (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=24-236-049&SortField=0&SummaryType=0&PageSize=10&SelectedRating=-1&VideoOnlyMark=False&IsFeedbackTab=true#scrollFullInfo)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001378 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001378)

Anyone have any particular thoughts or experiences with any of these?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 18, 2011, 02:32:26 PM
Personally, I'd go with the Dell. They generally make a higher quality monitor than I typically run into.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 18, 2011, 03:44:28 PM
Eh, used to be true, but we've recently got a slew of 16:9 aspect ratio 20" monitors that are really really cheap looking, even for TN monitors. Ghastly viewing angles. I'm talking about color washout at a mere weave or bob of your head. This particular monitor, according to the reviews posted, seems to be one of those.

I'd honestly go for the ASUS, based on the newegg reviews. Asus is primarily a gaming brand, and those are its target audience.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 18, 2011, 04:45:49 PM
Since the Asus can take DVI and HDMI, is there any difference between using a DVI-DVI cable from the video card, or is there an advantage with DVI-HDMI?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 18, 2011, 05:11:24 PM
HDMI is for teh TV. As in, you can plug in your Playstation/XBox/Wii into it as if it were an actual TV!

DVI is for teh 'puter. You are probably thinking of a DisplayPort output, which looks like HDMI, but ain't, and is now appearing more and more frequently on video cards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 18, 2011, 05:31:55 PM
No, I meant what I typed. My video card has 2 DVI outputs, but also came with a DVI-HDMI cable, which I use for the TV right now. Wasn't sure if it made any difference whatsoever.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 19, 2011, 02:10:52 AM
If your monitor has speakers the HDMI can sometimes also supply sound.  I'm not sure exactly how that works.  Otherwise, no difference.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 19, 2011, 07:31:25 AM
Went with the Asus as some weird issues came up with the Samsung reviews. Hopefully I can has pretty monitor soon. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on February 19, 2011, 08:09:45 AM
I recall having this problem at one point during the RC, but I can't recall what I did to fix it.

some things to try from a different forum:

1) Unselect cleartype
2)
   - Click Start Orb > right-click computer > click properties
   - On the left pane click Advanced system settings
   - Under performance click Settings
   - Check mark Smooth edges of screen fonts
   - Click OK > click OK

3) Change all fonts sizes and types to tahoma and Trebuchet MS (XP style).

Edit: Another thread at AnandTech says to just disable 'smooth edges of screen fonts'
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=333998
Quoting this from forever ago just to say thanks. I had a similar issue to what Lantyssa was having (and remember reading about it months ago), and #2 fixed it.

Edit: Or at least, it fixed the issue in Firefox.

To elaborate: since building a new computer and upgrading to Win7 for the first time, fonts on everything look like shit. They're blurry and really hard to read. F13 was the worst, but Viin's suggestion there seems to have fixed Firefox. WoW, however, is another matter; chat and menus are basically illegible. Color seems to be a factor; the green of guild chat isn't too bad, but reds are godawful. I took a pic with my cellphone:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on February 19, 2011, 01:13:18 PM
Since switching to Win7 on my new machine, I've found that I can no longer view MKV files using Media Player, and stuff like MP4 doesn't work either. I've googled, but I'd rather get advice on which codec to download from here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on February 19, 2011, 01:22:14 PM
I had the same issue too so I switched back to VLC. (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/) I'm not really sure why I ever switched away in the first place, most likely laziness.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on February 19, 2011, 05:05:52 PM
Ran into an issue that a friend bought a GTX 460(mainstream) video card and he's hitting CPU bottleneck in video games. I was kinda shocked to see how bad it was in-person but here's a graph of a GTX 280 (http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/cpu_scaling_with_the_geforce_gtx_280,6.html) to illustrate the effects.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 19, 2011, 06:14:05 PM
Where exactly are you seeing this bottleneck? Seems like the graph illustrates that slower CPUs = less performance, which makes sense.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 19, 2011, 11:45:29 PM
No, I meant what I typed. My video card has 2 DVI outputs, but also came with a DVI-HDMI cable, which I use for the TV right now. Wasn't sure if it made any difference whatsoever.

HDMI is effectively DVI + Audio in the same connector (though the spec has changed and that is not entirely true anymore). If your monitor has a DVI in, and your computer has a DVI out, you should use that.

Number one rule of thumb for any cabling that carries a signal of any sort: the fewer connections you have to make the better, if you don't need an adapter don't use one. Every connection has the potential to introduce both signal loss and interference and is one more possible point of failure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 20, 2011, 05:30:26 AM
Ran into an issue that a friend bought a GTX 460(mainstream) video card and he's hitting CPU bottleneck in video games. I was kinda shocked to see how bad it was in-person but here's a graph of a GTX 280 (http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/cpu_scaling_with_the_geforce_gtx_280,6.html) to illustrate the effects.
I'd believe it.  Unless you're really pushing resolution, or the graphics routines aren't well optimized, then graphics cards are far past what you need these days, and CPU does become the main limiter.  At least your friend has a good card for when he updates the rest of the system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on February 21, 2011, 08:14:32 AM
Where exactly are you seeing this bottleneck? Seems like the graph illustrates that slower CPUs = less performance, which makes sense.

The game started stuttering like there was a lag. The resolution increased slightly (1680x1050) but the detail still wasn't able to be cranked. Monitoring the system with process explorer we could see the CPU hitting 75-90% usage. Pulled the card out and dropped it into my q6600 and it was preforming fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on February 21, 2011, 03:50:47 PM
HDMI is effectively DVI + Audio in the same connector (though the spec has changed and that is not entirely true anymore). If your monitor has a DVI in, and your computer has a DVI out, you should use that.

Number one rule of thumb for any cabling that carries a signal of any sort: the fewer connections you have to make the better, if you don't need an adapter don't use one. Every connection has the potential to introduce both signal loss and interference and is one more possible point of failure.

Interesting thing I found out recently - DVI from most modern video cards carries the audio signal when used with a DVI to HDMI dongle and an HDMI cable.  Nifty.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 21, 2011, 04:28:51 PM
I haven't found that to be true, but perhaps the video card I bought 2 years ago isn't modern enough.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on February 21, 2011, 05:01:34 PM
I discovered it entirely by accident - I wasn't getting any video signal from the card with the DisplayPort/Micro-HDMI dongle to HDMI on the GTX460, so I swapped out for the DVI dongle just to fiddle in the BIOS and get Windows installed/working.  When everything was said and done, I had audio coming out with no other fiddling needed and Windows had picked up my A/V receiver (by model number!) as an audio device option in the control panel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 24, 2011, 11:52:30 PM
So, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is available now. Anyone installed it? If so any problems? 64-bit?

Wary of SP's, they've utterly b0rked PC's for me before now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on February 26, 2011, 04:44:29 PM
Any other suggestions? I used to have the correct codecs etc, but with my old machine being vapourised, I have no idea what they were, and I'm wary of downloading shit from randomly googled sites. I'll check out VLC probably, but I'd really much prefer to just have all my videos play in Media Player.

I'm also looking for a good comics reader that won't require me to shit up my system with .net framework - I dislike needing to log onto my machine manually after when I turn it on.



Since switching to Win7 on my new machine, I've found that I can no longer view MKV files using Media Player, and stuff like MP4 doesn't work either. I've googled, but I'd rather get advice on which codec to download from here.

I had the same issue too so I switched back to VLC. (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/) I'm not really sure why I ever switched away in the first place, most likely laziness.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 26, 2011, 04:56:57 PM
Worth a shot: http://www.cccp-project.net/ (http://www.cccp-project.net/)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on February 26, 2011, 06:07:44 PM
I used Media Player Classic, though I haven't installed it since I upgraded to Win 7.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 27, 2011, 01:29:48 AM
I've been using VLC for years now, seems far better than WMP. It just works for everything. Also looks better with lower res source (eg DVDs) than WMP on a large screen, especially if you try out different post-processing options.

CDisplay is the standard comic reader AFAIK. Old, but still seems to work fine in Win 7.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 27, 2011, 07:13:27 PM
So, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is available now. Anyone installed it? If so any problems? 64-bit?

Wary of SP's, they've utterly b0rked PC's for me before now.

I installed it and it's business as usual.  I haven't had any notable problems with W764 in the first place, though.

Circling back to my Sims 3 performance trouble in the wife's machine, I had sometimes suspected the hard disk (a WD 1TB Green) but wasn't able to pin anything on it.  It recently went toes up, though, with SMART giving a hard failure in the BIOS startup screen.  So either there needs to be some SMART logging in the Win7 error log, or I didn't know what I was looking for.  Knowing there was an electronics issue with the disk would have saved me a lot of grief.

On the good side, I installed W7 on the SSD that I had already put in there to hold TS3, and it's running fine now.  I do have to order a replacement storage disk, though, since the SSD is only ~100GB or something.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 28, 2011, 12:17:09 AM
I've had a nearly utterly fucked WD Black not throw up any SMART errors at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 28, 2011, 12:46:37 AM
So, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is available now. Anyone installed it? If so any problems? 64-bit?

Wary of SP's, they've utterly b0rked PC's for me before now.

I installed it and it's business as usual.  I haven't had any notable problems with W764 in the first place, though.

Thanks Yeg.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 28, 2011, 10:30:34 AM
I've had a nearly utterly fucked WD Black not throw up any SMART errors at all.

Honestly, I was surprised to see any.  First time for me, usually the drive letter just disappears on me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 28, 2011, 04:44:40 PM
Audio Help Please!

Relevant info:

I had a pair of the $100 Bose 2.0 PC Speakers (I know, I know, everyone says they're shit), but they fit me perfectly and didn't keep the wife up at night.  They started making a bunch of weird noise, first thought it was the janky MB driver/codec or sound card, but after yanking the speakers off the PC and testing them on my iPhone, I was getting the same noise.  Okay, so new speaker time.  

First, I tried a pair of M Audio AV30s, but they sounded too much like a boom box and I couldn't get the sound to NOT be in the rest of the house when using them, so they went back.  

Next, I went and bought the newer model of the $100 Bose 2.0 speakers, but they're missing a whole section of sound in the middle that was in the old pair, so they went back.  

Now I have a set of Klipsch ProMedia 2.1.  They seem to be okay after futzing with them a bit, the subwoofer I can turn off when the family is asleep and they seem to put out fairly decent sound for the price.  I'd love to spend $500 for an receiver and bookshelf speakers, but money is tight right now.  


The problem, need advice:

Getting the sound right where I like it required using iTunes to tinker with the equalizer and adjust some things around on my music.  I've actually got my music sounding better now than when they were on the Bose, no surprise there.  But how in the hell can I adjust the *rest* of my computer.... there's no equalizer in Win7 64bit.  Right now games sound terrible.

I've gotten used to iTunes for my music storage and don't want to switch out, is there some program I can download that will offer a "whole system" equalizer?  Or am I limited because I'm using stock s/c off my mb?

Thanks in advance!

EDIT:  The biggest issue with both the Klipsch and the Bose second pair are that there's some mid-range that seems like it's missing.  For example, explosions in RIFT sound hollow, and using a pick in Minecraft sounds almost hollow too, or like it's happening far-off.  This is really frustrating.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 28, 2011, 05:55:22 PM
If you have the realtek onboard audio on your mobo, the sound manager has an EQ that you can tweak, or use generic settings (rock, pop, etc).  I've set mine on rock and just left it.  Other than that, you could pick up a new sound card and use the software that (likely) comes with that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 28, 2011, 07:44:07 PM
Oh fuck it all.

Thanks, SnakeCharmer.  I failed to realize that when I did my Win7 upgrade last year that I never installed Realtek, so it was using stock Win7 drivers on audio.   :uhrr:

That said, after tinkering with the EQ on the Klipsch, I can't get them right either.  I'm seriously at a loss where to go now.  I don't need a powerhouse 2.0/2.1 system, just that it needs to sound good at a moderate volume.  It doesn't help that none of these dumbass stores have these hooked up, or if they are, they're playing the most sensitive piece of demo music that highlights all the good and none of the bad. 

Thanks again, any advice on 2.x systems, let me know. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 28, 2011, 08:46:10 PM
Should've kept the AV30s and readjusted your ears to the way your music is supposed to sound like :awesome_for_real: (I love my AV40s)

Which Bose did you have originally and which ones did you try to replace them with?

I still use my Bose MediaMate speakers as secondary speakers which were freakin expensive for computer speakers but have very good sound.

If you want 2.0 computers speakers and you don't want monitors have you listened to the Creative T40s?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 28, 2011, 09:25:50 PM
These are what I've had for a long time, they're perfect for my needs.  Sadly, they've got a short in them somewhere that is getting some weird digital static/interference noise:

http://www.amazon.com/Bose-MediaMate-multimedia-speakers-graphite/dp/B00008VGRC/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1298956898&sr=8-11

I tried to replace them with these:

http://www.amazon.com/Bose-Companion-multimedia-speaker-system/dp/B000HZDF8W/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1298956898&sr=8-1

Something in the 2-8k range is hosed on the Bose Companion and the Klipsch.  It's likely because I'm so used to the MediaMates, but I have to figure something out.  My MediaMates on my desk sound almost exactly like my Sennheiser HD595s do on my head. 

My local Microcenter has a pair of AV40s, I'm considering returning the Klipsch tomorrow and snagging the AV40s.  Outside of that, I'm at a loss.  I can't find the Creative T40s anywhere to buy them local or hear them even. 

Next step after the AV40s?  A box home theatre system? LOL.  I don't know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 28, 2011, 09:55:29 PM
If you are looking at studio monitors (which it sounds like you are with the M-Audio), I highly recommend the Alesis M1Acitve 320 USB. I went to Guitar Center to buy AV30s but they had none in stock, and the Alesis were recommended by the guy at the store. They cost considerably less than AV30/40s and they sound nearly as good as my M-Audio BX-5s Studio Monitors (which are WAY overkill for computer speakers).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 28, 2011, 10:38:18 PM
I would LOVE to listen to them, but they're nowhere in town.  Amazon has a pair for $84.00 but it's through a dealer I don't know that charges a 18% restock fee if returned.  I've also heard that they're bass heavy, which I need to avoid as I don't want to keep the family up at night.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 28, 2011, 11:13:00 PM
I would LOVE to listen to them, but they're nowhere in town.  Amazon has a pair for $84.00 but it's through a dealer I don't know that charges a 18% restock fee if returned.  I've also heard that they're bass heavy, which I need to avoid as I don't want to keep the family up at night.

The Bass is actually not super heavy if you turn the boost switch on the back to off. They are considerably more Bassy when that is turned on though, I think the only time I used it was when I was messing around and decided to listen to some house music with the bass way up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 01, 2011, 12:52:50 AM
Are you certain the games sounding terrible is a speaker problem?

Specifically, are you certain that your sound card is outputting stereo sound, that you have the correct drivers, that the drivers are recent, and that audio enhancements that could fuck with your sound quality are turned off?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 01, 2011, 07:42:56 AM
Also, have you tried a different output port and/or a different cord? A $5 cord could be your problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 01, 2011, 08:19:02 AM
I've triple checked everything in Sheepherder's post since yesterday.  The driver/codec was not installed properly, but I've got the recent driver installed now and while it offers the options I'm looking for, its not altering the speakers the way I want. 

The MediaMates still work, though intermittently.  They work normally about 80% of the time, then I get this weird interference/static "digital hopping" noise, almost like someone is tapping Morse code through them.  It lasts for 30 seconds, then goes off.  It might go away for a few hours, or a few seconds.  It also varies in volume, regardless of where the system AND speaker volume is set at.  Sometimes I can barely hear it, others I can hear it across the house.  It's really, really odd. 

It *could* be a short in a cord, maybe.  I might have to tinker with that.  I hate dicking around with intermittent problems, though.  So hard to troubleshoot. 

Anyways, I took the Klipschs back - regardless of audio issues I'm having I don't need a subwoofer and frankly, the wires were too thin for my liking.  My cats have been known to chew through thin wires, the bastards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 01, 2011, 08:28:21 AM
Why aren't you just using headphones at night and speakers when family aggro isn't an issue?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 01, 2011, 09:12:05 AM
I game mostly at night, for a few hours - more than an hour with headphones gives me a headache, though.  I'm weird.  Good question. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 01, 2011, 10:08:07 AM
Okay, after setting up the AV40s, I think this is what I was looking for all along.  These are tight - I wish I could have had access to the Alesis for listening purposes, but this will be good, I think.  Going to let them warm for a few hours and see if I can get them to break in a bit.  The AV40's highs crush my Bose MediaMates, finally *something* good. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 01, 2011, 11:13:18 AM
These are what I've had for a long time, they're perfect for my needs.  Sadly, they've got a short in them somewhere that is getting some weird digital static/interference noise:

http://www.amazon.com/Bose-MediaMate-multimedia-speakers-graphite/dp/B00008VGRC/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1298956898&sr=8-11
Those are what I have except in the original white color. They served me well as my primary computer speakers for a long time.


The MediaMates still work, though intermittently.  They work normally about 80% of the time, then I get this weird interference/static "digital hopping" noise, almost like someone is tapping Morse code through them.  It lasts for 30 seconds, then goes off.  It might go away for a few hours, or a few seconds.  It also varies in volume, regardless of where the system AND speaker volume is set at.  Sometimes I can barely hear it, others I can hear it across the house.  It's really, really odd. 
Do you have an iPhone that you leave turned on on your computer desk near the speakers? That'll cause that sort of static through some speakers.


I game mostly at night, for a few hours - more than an hour with headphones gives me a headache, though.  I'm weird.  Good question. 
Might want to checkout a HeadRoom headphone amp then:

http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/about-headroom-crossfeed.php


Okay, after setting up the AV40s, I think this is what I was looking for all along.  These are tight - I wish I could have had access to the Alesis for listening purposes, but this will be good, I think.  Going to let them warm for a few hours and see if I can get them to break in a bit.  The AV40's highs crush my Bose MediaMates, finally *something* good. 
MediaMates use a single midrange driver per speaker, which is presumably why you became accustomed to that "mid-range" sound, while the AV40s have the more traditional (for regular speakers) tweeter and woofer setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 01, 2011, 11:34:25 AM
Yeah, I do have both my iPhone and touch close to them.  I'll switch that around and see if it changes anything, thanks for the tip. 

The AV40s seem to have a volume dip situation with them.  They're only a few hours old, so I'll give them a few days to break in, but the volume level is wavering.  I'm making this entirely more complicated than it needs to be. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 01, 2011, 11:46:18 AM
Yes, yes you are.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 01, 2011, 11:52:56 AM
FYI: You won't get the cell phone distortion with the AV40s as they are magnetically shielded (unless the interference is hitting the wire between the computer and the speakers which is less likely but still possible).I am not familiar with the Bose ones you were using, but those could very possibly not be shielded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 01, 2011, 12:17:27 PM
FYI: You won't get the cell phone distortion with the AV40s as they are magnetically shielded (unless the interference is hitting the wire between the computer and the speakers which is less likely but still possible).I am not familiar with the Bose ones you were using, but those could very possibly not be shielded.
The Bose are shielded though not to the same extent the AV40s are. The iPhone is just one noisy GSM phone :awesome_for_real: I used to rest my old iPhone on an aluminum foil "sled" to cut down on that GSM noise.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 01, 2011, 02:53:41 PM
Son of a bitch!!!  The interference just popped up on the AV40s - and the iPhone was near the speakers when it happened.  Damn damn damn.  All this time... it was my phone.  It only took four pairs of speakers to get here...

Bose on the PC with phone nearby - interference.
Bose off the PC with phone nearby, used as source - interference.
AV40s on the PC with the phone nearby - interference. 

Just did an email push with the phone next to the speakers - interference, almost could hear the speakers talking there was so much.

Phone out of the room - nothing so far. 

---------

Thanks again, all for the info.  Now to decide if I want to keep my $150 upgrades!  :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 01, 2011, 04:47:00 PM
The Bose are shielded though not to the same extent the AV40s are. The iPhone is just one noisy GSM phone :awesome_for_real: I used to rest my old iPhone on an aluminum foil "sled" to cut down on that GSM noise.

Pretty much all smart phones are bad about that kind of interference. The guys who carried a Blackberry at my old job would set the speaker in the cisco voip phones to start buzzing from about 10 feet away.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 01, 2011, 05:01:37 PM
You never noticed the speakers go crazy whenever you got a call?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 01, 2011, 06:14:38 PM
Who uses a phone for calls?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 02, 2011, 07:56:52 AM
Anyone have a Sidewinder X6 keyboard?  If so, couple questions:
Does it have any USB inputs? 
If no, could I use a couple male/female adapters to plug in a Logitech G13 on one side and my wireless mouse USB thing on the other?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on March 02, 2011, 08:18:00 AM
Anyone have a Sidewinder X6 keyboard?  If so, couple questions:
Does it have any USB inputs?  
If no, could I use a couple male/female adapters to plug in a Logitech G13 on one side and my wireless mouse USB thing on the other?

No USB ports on the Sidewinder, and I'm not sure that you can connect anything but the number pad to the number pad interface and have it work (which I assume is what you're asking) - I've never tried it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 02, 2011, 08:48:29 AM
Yeah, the numpad connectors on the sides are totally proprietary, nothing else will connect there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 02, 2011, 10:20:00 AM
Crap.

Thanks guys.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 03, 2011, 03:24:49 PM
I have a new video camera which does not use tape.  This is fantastic, really, but new to me and my tired brain.  Without using the software that came with it, I'm copying off some .mts files which seem to be "AVCHD Video" according to Win7.  Supposing I purchase some BluRay authoring software, am I going to need some intermediate conversion software or is this standard enough that I might expect to hit the ground running?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 03, 2011, 03:52:11 PM
I have a new video camera which does not use tape.  This is fantastic, really, but new to me and my tired brain.  Without using the software that came with it, I'm copying off some .mts files which seem to be "AVCHD Video" according to Win7.  Supposing I purchase some BluRay authoring software, am I going to need some intermediate conversion software or is this standard enough that I might expect to hit the ground running?
You shouldn't need to convert it as AVCHD is the standard format used on Blu-ray right now so any relatively recent Blu-ray authoring program should support it directly (ancient ones might only support MPEG-2).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 03, 2011, 04:32:50 PM
New speakers are breaking in nicely.  It's time for a new sound card. 

Any recommendations?  I don't need to get crazy, but would like to see what options are there that might offer some better audio than onboard.  It's for 60% gaming 40% music.  Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 03, 2011, 04:35:15 PM
Which audio chipset does your MB have?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 03, 2011, 06:02:56 PM
I'm finding that sound card shopping is a minefield and I will be interested to find how this discussion plays out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 03, 2011, 07:30:03 PM
Asus P5K

http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=yS3ZeqfUdCTCIFT2

Quote
Realtek ALC 883, 8 -Channel High-Definition Audio CODEC
Coaxial / Optical S/PDIF out ports
ASUS Noise Filter
Support Jack-Sensing, Enumeration, Multi-streaming

EDIT: Obviously looking for something that will go into a new system I build later this year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 03, 2011, 08:16:41 PM
The software developers at Creative Labs are a bunch of turdburglars that deserve to be eaten by wolves.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 04, 2011, 07:23:49 AM
And yet their drivers were miles ahead of the Auzentech, which was a far superior slab of hardware. I really miss my onboard 5.1 DD conversion output through optical. With the X-Fi, I need a converter box, which breaks the digital chain...but I can't tell how it's affecting anything in windows 7, since I don't have surround working at all in windows 7, FFS.

Maybe I should try the Auzentech in the w7 machine...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 04, 2011, 12:32:18 PM
Creative apparently has a fix for 5.1 and EAX.  Whether I'd trust it not to rape my OS is another thing


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 04, 2011, 01:50:11 PM
This one?

http://forums.creative.com/t5/Sound-Blaster/%C2%BA/m-p/516445?view=by_date_ascending


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 04, 2011, 03:05:36 PM
Anytime I think of Creative now I have my old boss (who worked at Creative in the late 90s) imitating the CEO of Creative chanting at a company wide meeting "D V D is good for porn!" in a bad asian accent.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 04, 2011, 04:03:31 PM
The actual download page has some stuff described as fixes, I may sort through it eventually, but at the moment I just thought it would be easier to pull the card out again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 04, 2011, 07:24:54 PM
OK, so I do have a question...

All my TVs are modern flat screens with digital tuners.  Will the TVs not using the big Comcast HD box require the DTAs? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 05, 2011, 10:28:35 AM
Are you connecting the TV to the cable?

If you are conencting it to the cable without a box, you probably won't get any channels (or will only get them for a short period) as Comcast is rolling to a "converter box only" digital system in all markets nationwide. No a digital tuner won't resolve that as digital cable uses a different technology than digital over-the-air broadcast.

If you are just trying to get the local stations over the air you will be fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 05, 2011, 10:45:04 AM
Yes, connecting via coaxial.  Hell, the cable from the little DTA to the TV is coaxial cable.

Well.  Shit.  Goddamnit I hate Comcast.  U-verse is terrible here, can't get Verizon, and satellite is out of the question (massive freaking trees) and all three would require me to hook up one more goddamn thing than I should need or want just to watch TV.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 05, 2011, 05:16:36 PM
Give up on TV and your problem is solved!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 05, 2011, 07:29:10 PM
Less than two months until the great No TV Experiment of 2011 begins. Should be interesting, I'm actually looking forward to it. It's already nice looking forward to no phone bill for another 11 months or so.

And on my surround issues...it's always fun being a dumbass. Windows 7 put an extra layer on the amount of speaker configuration selections (I think there were three places total). They all had to be ticked 5.1, I had only hit 2 of the 3. Poking around I found the one buried like four control panels deep and now it's working. Well, after I properly wired it, I had two connections backward but couldn't tell because it had been putting out a stereo signal. So...I'm happy now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 05, 2011, 08:59:01 PM
Windows 7 put an extra layer on the amount of speaker configuration selections (I think there were three places total).

Lolwut?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 06, 2011, 04:08:33 AM
So my front panel audio is AC97, which is shitty, because it means no auto-detection/configuration when I plug my headphones in.  My options are to have my headphones only receive 2/5 channels with the other three being lost, or have my soundcard have front and back as two separate outputs (need to change sound device every time I want to swap).  Does anyone know a way to force a Realtek onboard to output stereo and 5.1 simultaneously?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 06, 2011, 08:55:41 AM
Get an X-Fi  :drill:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 06, 2011, 02:49:03 PM
Oh, that reminds me.  The hardware guys at Creative should die of syphilis for that horseshit proprietary Creative front panel output.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 07, 2011, 07:14:51 AM
Yeah, fuck those assclowns who make a product that does what your onboard sound can't. They suck lolz. And Bill Gates, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 07, 2011, 07:48:31 AM
Yeah, fuck those assclowns who make a product that does what your onboard sound can't.

Well, you see: since neither my Audigy 2, nor my X-Fi actually have front panel connectors I can use without fabricating my own wiring harnesses and possibly a hardware codec, it would be kind of hard for them to clone a 5.1 signal, downsample it to 2.1, and output it to my front panel, wouldn't it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 07, 2011, 11:28:27 AM
Get USB headphones  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on March 07, 2011, 01:20:53 PM
I bought a pair of logitech g35s for myself for Christmas and they're just great. They felt a little heavy at first but I don't even notice them now even after several hours.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 07, 2011, 09:07:22 PM
Kind of defeats the purpose of having a nice sound card, though.

Also, the entire reason I'm trying to do this is so that I don't have to fuck with sound settings ever time I plug in a headset.  I'm not certain that USB headphones allow that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 07, 2011, 10:22:41 PM
Kind of defeats the purpose of having a nice sound card, though.

Also, the entire reason I'm trying to do this is so that I don't have to fuck with sound settings ever time I plug in a headset.  I'm not certain that USB headphones allow that.

They probably won't.

USB sound devices still have to go through the system sound drivers to have audio routed to them. You might get away with having the USB dongle you get with some headsets plugged in and then you could plug your headphones in as you wish.

I know on my machine, the Realtek drivers allow for 2 outputs, one which is defined as a secondary one for VoIP applications, and one which the main system sounds are routed to. It is how I keep games/tv/music etc on the speakers while having Ventrilo come through the headset. But I don't have any fancy 5.1 or anything, just a set of studio monitors for stereo output.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 07, 2011, 11:59:56 PM
I know on my machine, the Realtek drivers allow for 2 outputs, one which is defined as a secondary one for VoIP applications, and one which the main system sounds are routed to. It is how I keep games/tv/music etc on the speakers while having Ventrilo come through the headset. But I don't have any fancy 5.1 or anything, just a set of studio monitors for stereo output.

Yeah, that's effectively what I have now, but reconfiguring the game's audio output every time I want to use headphones (or not) pisses me off.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 08, 2011, 08:11:13 AM
Do your speakers have a headphone jack on them? If you just plug a set of headphones into there it should route all audio to the headphones and remove the sound card from the loop entirely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 09, 2011, 07:11:52 AM
Wait...

Are you trying to route sound through your speakers and headphones at the same time?  Or just from the same source (i.e. a nice new sound card, or using onboard Realtek)?

If so, just get one of these and plug it in the output of your sound card.  Plug in the headphones to one side, plug the speakers into the other.  If your headphones have inline volume adjustment just turn it down when you don't want to listen to it.

(http://lh4.googleusercontent.com/public/k7aYkn0VGigLJ0Cf4p4QMV91JNqTp4H3jGTVMvduKvnBwU5ApD-HwP1Xf5UJ8_E11t3Ljd9bqD6AHyxx29DNa9HIyCQmWbBtvQt6ynm3orvuCrf0WzRtu4IWQz8_sNMC5BVcC-1p6w)

And if this isn't what you're trying to do, ignore this post  :grin:  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 09, 2011, 07:25:21 PM
Do your speakers have a headphone jack on them? If you just plug a set of headphones into there it should route all audio to the headphones and remove the sound card from the loop entirely.
If so, just get one of these and plug it in the output of your sound card.  Plug in the headphones to one side, plug the speakers into the other.  If your headphones have inline volume adjustment just turn it down when you don't want to listen to it.

That splitter is effectively the same thing as a headphone jack on the speakers, which is effectively the same thing as my front panel if I set it to play the same signal as my rear panel.  They both would result in my headphones getting only the front right and front left speakers, which means audio dead zones to front, rear right, and rear left.

Unless I reconfigured my audio to Stereo every time I want to switch, which is what I want to avoid, because a number of games seem to need a restart for output changes to take effect, and then I have to fuck with volume settings because my headphones will skullfuck me in the earholes if I leave it at 100%.  Then, when I want to enable my 5.1 again, it's a toss of a coin as to whether or not I've lost the +/- dB gain/loss on my speakers.  Creative's drivers in particular seemed to like wiping out settings once you change the output format.

My current setup uses my Realtek card with the front and rear outputs handled independently, which keeps the output and volume adjustments intact.  But it requires I change the sound device every time I make the switch, and sometimes it requires I change the system default sound device when the game doesn't have that setting.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 10, 2011, 07:06:03 AM
Ah, I didn't notice you had 5.1 headphones...Sorry

Which brand?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 10, 2011, 09:44:10 AM
5.1 speakers and stereo headphones.

There are 3 jacks outputting 6 channels on a 5.1 setup, one of which is the subwoofer.  There is 1 jack on a headphone.  The jack on the front panel, rather than outputting something appropriate for headphones, instead outputs the FR and FL channels from my 5.1 setup.  There are two workarounds, both of them require me to manually reconfigure my sound card often, ergo both of them suck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on March 10, 2011, 12:24:09 PM
I see what you're saying.  Sounds like the simple solution is to just get a set of USB headphones and call it a day?  The Plantronics stuff has always been good to me, and their USB dongle has a built in sound card.

Or you could pop open your case and make sure your cases front headphone/mic jack wires are connected to the right pins.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 10, 2011, 02:35:18 PM
They are.  Intel's spec even says I'm not supposed to have jack sensing.

It's kind of retarded.  Two programs, one in stereo and one in 5.1?  Can do, if the program allows you to specify a sound device.  One program output in both stereo and 5.1?  That's crazy talk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Xilren's Twin on March 12, 2011, 08:52:42 AM
So i know what what the problem with EA's drm activation program is.  It apparently uses the windows managment information WMI, and since mine is not properly reporting stuff like processoer make and type, it fails. i.e.
(http://i.imgur.com/HN86i.jpg)

I have attempted Win7/Vista:
Command Prompt ' net stop winmgmt '
  then 'winmgmt /salvagerepository' without quotations.
net localgroup administrators NetworkService /ADD

The above command is supposed to rebuild the repository if it is corrupted and then restart the WMI service.
I also updated my BIOS, no change.

Any ideas on how to fix WMI?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 12, 2011, 10:09:39 AM
Does Windows need updated drivers for your motherboard?

It shouldn't, but maybe being in the bioware.ad.ea.com domain has an effect?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Xilren's Twin on March 12, 2011, 11:33:38 AM
Does Windows need updated drivers for your motherboard?

It shouldn't, but maybe being in the bioware.ad.ea.com domain has an effect?

Actually, thats not my pc it's just an example of the problem a bioware guy posted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 12, 2011, 11:50:26 AM
I was wondering why you weren't sharing all of those delicious secret documents with us.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 12, 2011, 12:34:15 PM
So the Bioware/EA guys don't know how to fix it either?  And it's their downloader that's messed up by it? :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 12, 2011, 12:48:39 PM
My initial guess is that it is a chipset driver thing. Possibly lack of them being installed.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: JWIV on March 17, 2011, 03:33:17 PM
Should've kept the AV30s and readjusted your ears to the way your music is supposed to sound like :awesome_for_real: (I love my AV40s)

Which Bose did you have originally and which ones did you try to replace them with?

I still use my Bose MediaMate speakers as secondary speakers which were freakin expensive for computer speakers but have very good sound.

If you want 2.0 computers speakers and you don't want monitors have you listened to the Creative T40s?


Thanks for the recommendation of the AV's.  I missed out on the AV40's in the last woot-off, but I did go ahead and snag the AV30's to replace a shitty logitech 2.1 setup.  They sound absolutely fantastic. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on March 21, 2011, 03:31:41 PM
Not a question, really, but IE9 is out today for those of you who pay attention to such things.

The url is kind of  :uhrr::

http://www.beautyoftheweb.com/#/download


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 21, 2011, 03:44:47 PM
Anyone know what the latest and greatest in malware removal is for w7 64bit?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 21, 2011, 04:31:00 PM
Microsoft Security Essentials:

http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/default.aspx


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 21, 2011, 04:39:24 PM
Microsoft Security Essentials:

http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/default.aspx

Already has that running, looking more for removal not prevention.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 21, 2011, 05:10:26 PM
MSE does removal.

If you are looking for a second "opinion", Malwarebytes (http://www.malwarebytes.org) is pretty good.

For trojans, I tend to use Stinger (http://www.mcafee.com/us/downloads/free-tools/stinger.aspx) as it historically seemed to catch things that other larger suites sometimes miss.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 21, 2011, 07:24:14 PM
When I turned my laptop off last night it was working fine. When i turned it on today it is taking 10min to boot, can't access the second harddrive petition, and is unusably slow.

I am trying to go through all the usual virus etc steps, but it taking half a lifetime. Is it likely to be from that or could the hard drive has crapped itself?

Impossible to do work at the moment and really really annoying.

Is it perhaps a broken partition table or something like that?


Confirmed hd failure, getting a new one under warranty. Fun.
Yeah, second partition not showing in defrag (though showing but inaccessable in explorer)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 21, 2011, 08:58:00 PM
Could be a lot of things. Since they are sending you a new drive finding the cause is somewhat moot.

Back up any important data you can now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 21, 2011, 10:55:24 PM
Any free and easy way to try reclaim what was on the broken partition? I can't remember what I had on there and might regret it later.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 21, 2011, 11:14:05 PM
Sledgehammer works wonders for crushing regrets. Not so good for recovering regrets to bask in later.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 22, 2011, 03:24:09 AM
Any free and easy way to try reclaim what was on the broken partition? I can't remember what I had on there and might regret it later.

I'd try plugging it into a desktop, assuming it has SATA connectors.  I know nothing about laptop drives though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 22, 2011, 05:55:12 AM
You can try Drive Rescue 1.9d to see if the data is accessible at all.  There's probably something newer, but that's what I've used in the distant past.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on March 22, 2011, 10:30:52 AM
The industry standard seems to be SpinRite (http://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm) Its $90 USD however.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 22, 2011, 11:24:13 AM
I believe Drive Rescue has a limited trial. I forget how limited, probably too much for your purposes, but worth checking out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 22, 2011, 02:17:26 PM
Thanks for the suggestions everyone.

Just being able to see what is on there would be helpful, so a limited trial might be all I need.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 23, 2011, 06:18:14 PM
So they gave me a new hard drive. Installed with Windows 7 ultimate. Now the stupid thing is telling me the version of windows is not genuine, and after being dicked about on the phone for a while, it seems I cannot make it so without changing my version of windows back to home premium?

Should I care and bother to do this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 23, 2011, 06:42:54 PM
So they gave me a new hard drive. Installed with Windows 7 ultimate. Now the stupid thing is telling me the version of windows is not genuine, and after being dicked about on the phone for a while, it seems I cannot make it so without changing my version of windows back to home premium?

Should I care and bother to do this?
Who were you talking to, Microsoft or the laptop manufacturer? Did you get a Windows 7 Ultimate key with the new drive?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on March 23, 2011, 06:44:35 PM
Should I care and bother to do this?

If your still not genuine your OS will switch to a reduced functionality (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925582) after a period of 30 days. It will trigger automatic logouts/shutdowns after one hour of being logged in so you really want to resolve it.

Trippy your quick!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 23, 2011, 09:42:07 PM
So they gave me a new hard drive. Installed with Windows 7 ultimate. Now the stupid thing is telling me the version of windows is not genuine, and after being dicked about on the phone for a while, it seems I cannot make it so without changing my version of windows back to home premium?

Should I care and bother to do this?
Who were you talking to, Microsoft or the laptop manufacturer? Did you get a Windows 7 Ultimate key with the new drive?

Nope, no key. Was talking to both of them at one time or the other. A useless and frustrating process.

All I have are my vista to windows 7 home premium upgrade disks, with the product key for that.

There is no "Windows activation" section in the system menu.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on March 23, 2011, 09:45:44 PM
You lost your ultimate key?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 23, 2011, 09:51:42 PM
Never had one. I don't know why the guy put ultimate on the hard drive. I only have a home premium key.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 23, 2011, 11:41:46 PM
I thought Win7 activation was all based on the type of key you put in, not the actual installer... Oh wait, that is Server 2008 R2...nm.

You basically want to figure out how to get a copy of the proper install file, or see about upgrading your home premium to ultimate (not sure if that is even possible).

There is no "Windows activation" section in the system menu.

There should be a section at the bottom of the system contol panel with a link to "change product key", is that not there?

EDIT: Do you still have your original system restore disk and the upgrade disk for 7? Your quickest solution is probably going to be just nuking the Ultimate install from orbit and doing the install rather than fighting with MS and/or your computer manufacturer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 23, 2011, 11:50:50 PM
There is no "Windows activation" section in the system menu.

There should be a section at the bottom of the system contol panel with a link to "change product key", is that not there?

EDIT: Do you still have your original system restore disk and the upgrade disk for 7? Your quickest solution is probably going to be just nuking the Ultimate install from orbit and doing the install rather than fighting with MS and/or your computer manufacturer.

Wasn't there all day. Checked again now and it is there. However slui.exe gives an application error when I try to change it. Progress of sorts... Might try a restart and see what happens.

Now I'm being told that because I only have an "upgrade" version of Windows 7 I can't even do this myself, but need Dell to do it for me. These idiots...

EDIT: Installed Home Premium from ugrade disks. All seems to be ok. Activated and etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 25, 2011, 02:22:36 PM
I believe that the upgrade installer just has a check for an existing OS in it, but otherwise does a full installation.  It doesn't actually "upgrade" your OS.  But you figured it out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 25, 2011, 04:18:36 PM
Adobe Acrobat has to go.  Suggestions on a replacement?  I just need a viewer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 25, 2011, 04:35:36 PM
I used Foxit for a while with reasonable results until I got a machine powerful enough to run Acrobat :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 25, 2011, 05:33:38 PM
Adobe Acrobat has to go.  Suggestions on a replacement?  I just need a viewer.

Foxit is definitely the best general purpose reader I have used. Much faster than Acrobat.

Has some problems with some pdf files with weird watermarks but 99% of the time it works great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2011, 10:02:39 PM
Preview.







 :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 26, 2011, 01:51:35 AM
PDF Xchange (http://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-viewer) works very well on Win7 64bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 26, 2011, 10:48:06 AM
Thanks.  It's less of a hardware power issue and more of a "acrobatxwtfbbq" issue.  I don't give too much of a shit as long as I can view the files I want to view, but when it hangs my browser or starts popping errors, it's time for a change.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on March 27, 2011, 03:40:46 PM
If you use google chrome.. assign the default open (http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/43764/how-to-enable-google-chrome-as-your-default-pdf-reader-the-easy-way/) to the browser and it will render it well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 28, 2011, 11:51:13 AM
If you use google chrome..

NoScript


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on March 28, 2011, 12:51:24 PM
If you use google chrome..

NoScript

Depends on what you use it for, if its to kill flash/plug-ins that's simple via

Wrench -> Options -> Under the bonnet -> Content Settings 
Look for Plug-ins and choose "Block All"

Any website will then have a greyed out box like noscript you can interact with the element and a site exception button in the address/search bar.

You can kill all JavaScript in the same spot also but it doesn't filter out XSS like noscript, seems to be a blanket site exception.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 28, 2011, 01:23:44 PM
I use it to be ridiculously paranoid. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 04, 2011, 12:57:50 PM
So, I got a forwarded email from...let's call it "Family" wherein they (correctly) summed up the difference between HTTP and HTTPS, noted that they had verified the contents fron Snopes, and correctly linked it to "Why the people at Facebook are idiots" and stated that, at a bare minimum, you shouldn't be sending anything confidential over HTTP.

My question is this: Should I explain what a 'certificate' is and how to check on their default browser that the one they have is legitimate? (Not that it's hard, and hopefully their settings would kick it to the main screen with a 'This certificate can't be verified') or should I just go ahead and consider this a 'win'?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 04, 2011, 04:26:04 PM
That's pretty good for a newb, so I'd run with it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 04, 2011, 08:39:49 PM
So, I got a forwarded email from...let's call it "Family" wherein they (correctly) summed up the difference between HTTP and HTTPS, noted that they had verified the contents fron Snopes, and correctly linked it to "Why the people at Facebook are idiots" and stated that, at a bare minimum, you shouldn't be sending anything confidential over HTTP.

My question is this: Should I explain what a 'certificate' is and how to check on their default browser that the one they have is legitimate? (Not that it's hard, and hopefully their settings would kick it to the main screen with a 'This certificate can't be verified') or should I just go ahead and consider this a 'win'?

Consider it a win, nearly all modern browsers rain down hellfire and brimstone if god himself didn't descend from the heavens and install the cert.  I mean really with each browser generation it gets harder and harder to friggen add my own self signed cert that I issued to my private server a permanent exception.  No really thanks chrome I didn't want to use the relatively painless to acquire and install self issued never expiring free cert for my own purposes anyhow.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 05, 2011, 10:57:49 AM
My work can't even get their certificates done properly. I'm serious -- I work for fucking NASA, and they -- for someone unknown reason -- have not bothered to get their own certificates certified by a TRA that comes with the browser, meaning we all have to install as TRA NASA's own.

I'm pretty sure that the US government has some trusted root authority certificates that come setup in the default browser packs, insofar as it's "the fucking US government" but apparently getting their shit signed by that is just too hard.

The fact that hand-installing all this crap gives users bad ideas about whether installing certificates or clicking "continue" on "this certificate cannot be authenticated, do you wish to continue?" is just ignored.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 05, 2011, 12:55:06 PM
Microsoft has a program for government agencies to get their cert servers added to the root authority list, unfortunately that doesn't help you ditch ie. 

I think it is completely retarded that there is not a single root authority for cost effective (ie nonprofit) certs to cover .gov and .us domains for federal, state and local government.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 10, 2011, 08:19:07 AM
This morning my wife bumps her computer with her knee and it powers down.  After a few minutes of ranting from me (this fucking computer...), I determine that if I unplug and replug the power, I get a subsecond poweron: LEDs flash and the CPU fan starts to spin.  It immediately powers down, though, and subsequent presses of the power button do nothing.  The above occurs when I detach/retach the mobo power link as well.  I see two LEDs on the mobo are lit (no Picard jokes please).  I'm hoping for a loose wire so I reseat the power/reset/etc cluster but no change.  I'm not sure where to go from here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on April 10, 2011, 08:26:14 AM
New board.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 10, 2011, 08:35:02 AM
Loose memory sticks?

Worst case, there was a loose wire and when she bumped it it hit something and shorted. Probably the mobo in that case.

But, try resetting cmos and pulling out cards one at a time to see if you can at least get it to boot. Other option is your power supply is shot and short itself with the sudden off.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 10, 2011, 08:57:04 AM
Failing power supply?  Do you have a spare?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 10, 2011, 01:00:02 PM
This morning my wife bumps her computer with her knee and it powers down.  After a few minutes of ranting from me (this fucking computer...), I determine that if I unplug and replug the power, I get a subsecond poweron: LEDs flash and the CPU fan starts to spin.  It immediately powers down, though, and subsequent presses of the power button do nothing.  The above occurs when I detach/retach the mobo power link as well.  I see two LEDs on the mobo are lit (no Picard jokes please).  I'm hoping for a loose wire so I reseat the power/reset/etc cluster but no change.  I'm not sure where to go from here.
Which LEDs are lit? Does your MB have a POST code display or is your MB speaker hooked up? Did you check to make sure the heat sink is still attached properly?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 11, 2011, 05:48:58 AM
I don't have a spare power supply of sufficient modernity... except the one in my own rig which I need to rebuild anyway, so I might try that.  Did not check the HS but I think that must be a low-chance item.

There's no post code display, there is a red power mode control button and a reset button.  They light up but neither one do anything.

I unplugged things one by one, and when I unplugged the video card from the power, I got a beep despite not having a speaker wired up.

I would expect a loose memory stick would still allow the fans to spin up, but I can pull those as well.  Since it's mobile, meaning it lives in a small desk with casters, there could be something shaken loose or otherwise fried due to that.  Maybe I'll pull out the battery to reset; do you need to short the battery pins on a PC mobo or can I just wait ten seconds?

The fun bit is that the cheapest matching mobo (ASUS P6T Deluxe) I find on newegg is $205, which seems odd considering the relative age of this machine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 11, 2011, 04:26:52 PM
The fun bit is that the cheapest matching mobo (ASUS P6T Deluxe) I find on newegg is $205, which seems odd considering the relative age of this machine.

End of Life parts = more spendy due to supply and demand.

The "older is cheaper" method works when you are in the "oh shit no one wants to buy the 5million of these we have in stock, cut prices!" mode and not the "there are 20 of these left on earth" mode.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 11, 2011, 05:28:15 PM
You are probably right, I will try something other than ASUS, blasphemous though it might be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 12, 2011, 08:19:52 AM
So I would like to install W7 SP1, but it needs a few gigs on the C:\. Is there a way to reallocate unused space from another partition to the C:\ ? I seem to be able to add/remove space from my storage partition at will, but not my system partition.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 12, 2011, 10:15:02 AM
So I would like to install W7 SP1, but it needs a few gigs on the C:\. Is there a way to reallocate unused space from another partition to the C:\ ? I seem to be able to add/remove space from my storage partition at will, but not my system partition.
There is a way but it's a bit tricky. Essentially you need to have an unallocated block of free space next to your system partition and then you can extend the system partition to include that unallocated space.

So let's say you have a 500 GB drive with something like

C: 50 GB (full)
D: 450 GB (100 GB free)
no unallocated space

The first step would be to shrink the D: partition by some amount of free space left, we'll do 50 GB

C: 50 GB
D: 400 GB
Unalloc: 50 GB

Next we need to move that unallocated space next to the C: partition

C: 50 GB
Unalloc: 50 GB
D: 400 GB

Now we can extend the C: partition

C: 100 GB
D: 400 GB

The hard part is moving that unallocated block. The standard Windows 7 disk management tools can't do that I don't believe so you'll need to find a third party tool that can do that.

Another option would be to backup your secondary partition, image your system partition, repartition your entire drive with a larger system partition and restore the image to that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 12, 2011, 10:44:05 AM
I've used Parted Magic (http://partedmagic.com) to do my partition resizing. You need to burn the ISO to a CD and boot from it. It will enter a linux-based environment with a parition editing tool on the desktop. 

Other than what Trippy said, the failures I've had with it surround the ability to shuffle the data around. If the data is too 'tight' and there's not enough wiggle room to do a temporary write, it may fail.

Read this:

http://gparted.sourceforge.net/larry/resize/resizing.htm

with special attention to this passage on NTFS file system (what windows uses for the most part)

Quote
DON'T DO any other operations on this (resized) partition before the reboot,
otherwise you will get errors. After the boot-up Windows logo,
the system will show a special screen, and a message
asking about drive consistency : Checking file system on c :


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 12, 2011, 11:27:54 AM
Hmm, that all sounds...painful.

Another question - when SP1 says it needs x free space to install the SP, is it asking for that space in order to unpack and do it's thing, or is it asking for permanent space? I'm thinking it's the latter.

And to think, I thought 34gb was enough... :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on April 12, 2011, 03:57:30 PM
The best first step might be to run something like SpaceMonger on the disk to see if there's any big obvious crap you can get rid of or move.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 13, 2011, 08:36:06 AM
At this point, I'd purchase a new drive of correct size and reinstall on that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 13, 2011, 11:38:42 AM
The drive itself has PLENTY of room...I just underestimated how much I needed for my OS partition.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2011, 11:47:09 AM
How much are you short? You could try and free up some space like Ingmar suggested. One big file you might be able to move is your swap file. By default it's created on your system partition but you can move it to another partition. That could free up quite a bit of space (e.g. mine is fixed at 8 GB).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 13, 2011, 11:59:47 AM
Currently have 2.28GB free on the drive. I could free up a bit more by deleting some things, but I'll have to look into both your suggestions.

Separately, really annoyed that some games (looking at YOU, recent BioWare titles) make their save files on my c:\ for no good reason, and I see no way to change that.

Fakeedit: And moving the pagefile from C to D didn't actually seem to change the space available on the drives. :oh_i_see:

Fakeedit 2: So SpaceMonger is actually a really neat little tool! I just wish I knew what the colors and symbols meant.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 13, 2011, 02:08:42 PM
Did you reboot after changing the pagefile?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 13, 2011, 05:29:43 PM
...no.  :awesome_for_real:

Also, I noticed the large amount of space reserved for Hibernate mode, which I've always had disabled. I should look into removing that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 14, 2011, 07:00:53 AM
The drive itself has PLENTY of room...I just underestimated how much I needed for my OS partition.

Sure but my suggestion would eliminate a lot of work+time spent.  You probably have quite a bit more free time than I do, and there's nothing wrong with dicking around with partitions.  Can be fun.

If you have hibernate disabled, I would think the file would not even be there.

The trick to the Win pagefile is that shrinking it requires a restart.  You can make new ones all day long.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 14, 2011, 03:18:30 PM
So after changing my pagefile (I shut down every night, so this is the first time I've looked after booting since the change) and disabled hibernate from the command line, I seem to magically have ~9GB free.  :awesome_for_real:

Anyone know offhand what exactly SP1 adds? Any known issues?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 14, 2011, 03:37:54 PM
SP1 is largely a collection of prior security updates. Do not expect any performance changes. If you have been keeping your machine up to date, it shouldn't be a very substantial download or install time. It is nowhere near the 2 hour ordeal of Vista SPs.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on April 14, 2011, 04:08:41 PM
BTW I believe you can delete the screenshots associated with those recent BioWare save game files without breaking anything (test on an unimportant save first.) Depending on your settings those files can take up a LOT of space.

EDIT:

And if you want to get into more potentially dangerous fucking around, here is a method I have not tested for relocating your Users directory off of the C: drive:

http://lifehacker.com/#!5467758/move-the-users-directory-in-windows-7 (http://lifehacker.com/#!5467758/move-the-users-directory-in-windows-7)

It appears to not be for the faint hearted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 15, 2011, 09:29:36 AM
Ya, moving the entire user directory structure to another drive and then creating a hard link from the C to the new user residence seems doable, but potentially problematic in the future. I might be a bit of a chicken here, but how many odd configurations have gone south when MS puts out an update that doesn't take into account the hacks you've had working for years, and you wake up one morning with a system that reports being broken?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 15, 2011, 03:42:41 PM
Which is one of the minor reasons I just make 1 partition on a drive when I install windows. The major reason is simply that I am lazy, of course.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on April 16, 2011, 05:23:18 AM
Doing that with Windows 7 is shooting yourself in the leg.  With a rocket launcher.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 16, 2011, 11:10:09 AM
I think CCleaner fucked up some network related part of my registry. Restoring an older registry did not work.
This is what my (paraphrasing here, cause I run the German version obviously) "Network" screen looks like...


I run Windows 7 (64bit) home, reinstalled the network driver from scratch and now I am out of ideas.

Internet still works, though.

Haelp!

edit: Sound seems to be fucked too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 16, 2011, 12:27:07 PM
Go to search box, type : cmd

Right click on the little CMD icon, select "Run as Administrator"

in the command prompt type: netsh winsock reset

Will require a reboot, but that will rebuild the network stack on any Microsoft OS XP SP2 or later.

Might solve your network problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 16, 2011, 01:47:47 PM
Thanks, but that did nothing for me.

I have the feeling that my problem are motherboard related, since both sound and LAN are onboard.

I got THIS  (http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.asp?Model=4Core1600Twins-P35)model. Now I can't find any Windows 7 drivers anywhere. What the f...  :awesome_for_real:



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 16, 2011, 02:05:45 PM
I got THIS  (http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.asp?Model=4Core1600Twins-P35)model. Now I can't find any Windows 7 drivers anywhere. What the f...  :awesome_for_real:

Usually, the Vista drivers will work for 7 in a worst case scenario.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 16, 2011, 04:36:10 PM
I got THIS  (http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.asp?Model=4Core1600Twins-P35)model. Now I can't find any Windows 7 drivers anywhere. What the f...  :awesome_for_real:

Usually, the Vista drivers will work for 7 in a worst case scenario.



So far they don't, I suppose I should use the 64bit drivers if I use Windows 7 (64) ?

fakeedit: Looks like the microsoft support pages are actually helpfull. Apparently there is a programm that scans for missing system files (sfc.exe). Sadly I am at work right now and can't give it a try.

Weird stuff happened, some menue items in the "Systemsteuerung" (System Control Panel ?) would not even respond to clicking them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 17, 2011, 12:48:08 AM
Ok, I am home from work now. SFC does not work because of "resource-protection" ?

Aa repair-install does not work, either. Looks like I will have to do a clean install, which would result in a loss of all data on all hard drives if I understood the process right.  :heartbreak:

Any other suggestions before I pull the trigger ? Going to get a few hours sleep beforehand.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: vex on April 17, 2011, 03:36:19 AM
You shouldn't lose everything on a clean install.  You will have to reinstall things but unless you format you shouldn't lose anything. 

If your destined for the reinstall route try doing an upgrade from your windows 7 to windows 7 first.  I think that is still possible as it's one of the ways to do a clean install with an upgrade disk and have the licensing work.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on April 17, 2011, 04:26:48 AM
If Windows 7 is anything like Vista a repair-install won't work unless you uninstall any Service Packs that might have gone in since you first installed Windows.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 17, 2011, 07:01:50 AM
If Windows 7 is anything like Vista a repair-install won't work unless you uninstall any Service Packs that might have gone in since you first installed Windows.
Which I can't, because the SP1 installation seems to be broken as well.  What the fuck did I do. :D

Actually this is the perfect timing for me, I have to finish a paper till Wednesday, this way Gaming won't distract me until I am done.  :grin:

On a related note, microsoft support pages said that registry "cleaners" are "snakeoil" anyway and do not help with system performance at all. True ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 17, 2011, 08:23:18 AM
Sorta. With windows xp and a machine that's been heavily used for years and years, it will collect a bunch of registry clutter that does hamper performance. CCleaner is free, and does what these 'snake oil' ones claim to do. Registry Mechanic -used- to be a good program, but now is a benign form of malware.

As to the effectiveness of a registry cleaner on Windows 7, I don't have a machine that's gummed up enough to do a comparison, but it wouldn't surprise me if by comparison to XP the impact is less.

One thing that is probably true is that registry cleaners will in all likelihood NOT solve a problem with your computer.

Der Helm, its possible that Windows 7 has the drivers for your card in Windows Updates. During driver installation, when it asks you to locate the drivers, there's a 'check automatic updates' or somesuch that will download a much larger listing of existing drivers. Not sure if you did that yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on April 17, 2011, 12:39:52 PM
Which I can't, because the SP1 installation seems to be broken as well.  What the fuck did I do. :D

Did you use driversweeper at one point? Older versions really messed up the base Windows 7 causing SP1 install failures.

See: driver sweeper issue thread (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139745)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 18, 2011, 04:13:50 AM
No, that one I did not use. Can't check on the name of the program since I am not at home right now but I THINK it was Glary registry repair.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on April 18, 2011, 11:00:12 AM
I'm with MS, registry cleaners are useless. (And actively harmful at worst.)

You could try going back to your oldest system restore point, unless you already did.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 18, 2011, 01:04:31 PM
I'm with MS, registry cleaners are useless. (And actively harmful at worst.)

You could try going back to your oldest system restore point, unless you already did.

No dice, restore points are broken as well.

 :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 18, 2011, 02:09:50 PM
smells of either HD failure or virusy stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 18, 2011, 04:39:33 PM
smells of either HD failure or virusy stuff.

Yeah, sounds like the nasty rootkit kind of virusy stuff at that.

I say back up any important files you can, and nuke it from orbit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 19, 2011, 08:08:28 AM
Is there a decent rootkit revealer for windows 7 yet?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on April 19, 2011, 05:55:53 PM
smells of either HD failure or virusy stuff.

Yeah, sounds like the nasty rootkit kind of virusy stuff at that.

I say back up any important files you can, and nuke it from orbit.
I very much doubt it, shit started hitting the fan while/after I was cleaning out my HD. I was uninstalling programms left and right and (now) I remember that I allowed one registry cleaner to delete some yellow coloured shit. Looking back that was a very dumb idea, looks like there really IS some important stuff hidden in the registry. I have the feeling that I deleted references to a big part of the SYSTEM, SYSTEM32 and SYSTEM64 folders. At least in my limited understand that would explain why big parts of windows simply ceased to function.

I blame being an old school MS DOS user, I am still used to pruning config.sys and autoexec.bat to free up enough memory to start up my games. I am still able to navigate and use  the "MSDOS-interface" when I have to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 20, 2011, 06:08:27 AM
You could try malwarebytes to see if it's able to repair those registry entries, but otherwise it sounds like it's time to backup and reformat.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 20, 2011, 06:56:44 AM
I blame being an old school MS DOS user, I am still used to pruning config.sys and autoexec.bat to free up enough memory to start up my games. I am still able to navigate and use  the "MSDOS-interface" when I have to.
When I'm tired and not paying attention, I mistakenly enter DOS commands into the BSD cmd line. I also do the opposite and I've run ls -al on my windows cmd line.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on April 20, 2011, 11:44:15 AM
I am surprised the spam post survived til now - maybe the gambling links in KittyKat's sig there were TOO hidden?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 20, 2011, 11:48:33 AM
They are getting smarter.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 20, 2011, 12:55:13 PM
They are getting smarter.


Almost....self-aware!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 20, 2011, 04:14:09 PM
They are getting smarter.



Yeah, they copied what I said. And since no one around here reads what I say, it got entirely missed.  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 20, 2011, 04:25:52 PM
Almost....self-aware!
So it's a step up from Cloud Dating?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 22, 2011, 10:28:53 AM
If you use powershell on Win, since it's POSIX you can expect `ls` to work.

My wife's computer is still down, I don't have time to repair it.  I am now suspicious that it is a CPU breakage rather than mobo since the new computer I built is doing the exact same thing.  Although I'm really just choosing to suspect the Intel i5 instead of the ASUS P7P55D.  Might me a smart move to RMA whichever one has the shortest warranty first.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on April 23, 2011, 08:22:52 AM
Didn't you recently have a PSsomething die?  Talk about a bad run of luck with electronics.  Is the power going to your house extremely dirty or something?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 24, 2011, 03:01:11 PM
Actually, now I think it was the eight-year-old power strip behind my AV center.  My TV, though, is just a piece of shit.  Stupid Mitsubishi.

My PC, being a new build, isn't related to the other stuff.  Pretty sure I just got a bad CPU.  My wife's PC, on the other hand, could be the victim of vibration since it's a regular PC on a rolling table.  It's had tons of issues since I built it, though.

In 2010, I did have two PS3 and one 360 die.  I'm blaming this on the power strip.  I don't like the non-60GB PS3 at all.  I really wish that Sony had the online storage last summer since I would have been able to save a lot of things which were destroyed when the first PS3 Slim went tits-up.  I had managed to use a heat gun to get the 60GB PS3 working so I could do a PS3-to-PS3 transfer, which was a bit hairy since I somehow broke the fan in the old one when I disassembled/reassembled it.  After THAT one died, I invoked the warranty and Sony send me a new unit, so some of my saves were lost forever (Demon's Souls, Dragon Age).  Also I had not done a backup for about two months, but now I backup individual saves every time before I shut down the console.  When the 360 died, I bought a new power strip and things have been quiet since then (minus the TV).

The upside is that I have a 360 in the bedroom now.

So far this year, I've only endured a failed ATi 5870 and a broken monitor on my corporate laptop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 25, 2011, 03:28:43 PM
Wow, you have lots of things die on you. I've only ever had a 360 die on me about 2 years ago, and it was covered. I had back-to-back Radeon cards die on me (those OEM fans SUCKED), and an old GeForce slip out of the AGP slot while the system was on, shorting it out. Had a LED monitor fritz out a few months back, but I didn't buy it new anyway, and the upgrade was So Worth It.

I guess I've had good luck with electronics, generally.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on April 27, 2011, 09:55:38 AM
My GPU (GTX260) is starting to have what I hope are heating issues. NVIDIA monitor software does not give me gpu temp so what do I need to download to keep tabs on my card?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 27, 2011, 10:26:05 AM
I did forget that my 21" LG PC monitor died last December, while I was on a cruise in which all of my luggage was soaked and my wife's $200 silk coat was ruined, and now I have a 26" ASUS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 27, 2011, 10:47:56 AM
Try RealTemp.  It reports GPU as well as CPU temps for my NVidia.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 27, 2011, 12:38:06 PM
EVGA has a decent utility, not sure if it's for their cards only or what. I was using something else with the 8800, but since I got the 460 I've been ok with the EVGA one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on April 27, 2011, 08:39:12 PM
EVGA Precision.  Works for any nvidia based card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on April 27, 2011, 08:58:16 PM
If you have a MSI card, their Afterburner software monitors temps quite nicely. Integrates with my G15 keyboard as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 28, 2011, 05:52:27 PM
Anyone know what the default font was in Firefox 3? Upgraded to 4 today, and the font has changed...somehow. It's subtle, but not as easy on the eyes as previously.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on April 28, 2011, 07:47:07 PM
Times New Roman


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 29, 2011, 08:15:02 AM
Decent PCI video card that Win XP and Win 7 (w/aero) compatable?  I want to add a 3rd monitor to my work machine and this crappy dell doesn't seem to have a large enough PCIe slot for a 2nd vid card but it does have 3 old school PCI slots avail.

edit: not for gaming so basically looking for the cheapest reliable card that will support aero at 1280x1024.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 29, 2011, 08:30:26 AM
New egg filtered search results r ur fren. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161353)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 29, 2011, 08:40:14 AM
I really miss newegg's filter power when I'm on just about any other retail site.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 29, 2011, 10:09:46 AM
New egg filtered search results r ur fren. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161353)

I suppose, but pricing and the probable need to upgrade the PSU has me thinking about an eyefinity card (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102875).

Either solution says a 400w PSU is required but the PCI would be a card in addition to the existing card vs eyefinity being a replacement for the existing card.  Anyone have experience with using a triple+ monitor setup with eyefinity?

edit: another alternative - do the cards that have vga+dvi+hdmi allow for triple monitors?  A bit wary since the stock Dell implementation I have now disables the DVI if I enable the display port.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Amarr HM on May 01, 2011, 11:52:09 AM
I'm trying to tether XBOX live using my Android phone I can connect no problem but I'm getting an error, it says nat type set to strict which means I can connect but connecting to other hosts doesn't work 90% of the time.  Can my provider fix this or do I need to Root the phone to get around this issue?

Btw: I have managed to play a few games of FIFA, but getting a game started takes forever I keep losing connection to host.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 01, 2011, 02:20:41 PM
The NAT issues are most likely with the phone and how it handles routing traffic to hosts going through it, not with your provider.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 05, 2011, 02:46:45 PM
I mentioned some crashes in one or two other threads.  During Torchlight and Dead Space.  I tried something on the advice of a friend, didn't think it would work but it did: I disconnected the new bluray drive.  Just now my only question is: WTF?  DRM?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 09, 2011, 08:42:11 AM
CentOS comes on eight CDs.  How much of that do I immediately need?  Eventually all of it if I'm going whole-hog into RHEL, but immediately I would expect to only need the first disc to do an installation.  Confirm?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 09, 2011, 09:10:12 AM
CentOS comes on eight CDs.  How much of that do I immediately need?  Eventually all of it if I'm going whole-hog into RHEL, but immediately I would expect to only need the first disc to do an installation.  Confirm?

Seriously doubt that.  I haven't installed CentOS but the other distros I have tried have all required multiple disks (not 8 but more than 1) for fairly standard install options. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 09, 2011, 09:51:33 AM
Alright, I was hoping to save some time and effort here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 09, 2011, 06:31:36 PM
The CentOS 8 disk multiple ISO thing is supposed to install the base OS without X off of the first CD. That being said, I could not get the fucking thing to work (hell it would not even "verify" the first ISO when I tried to install it that way). I ended up just installing bit torrent on one of the machines in the office and grabbing the DVD iso so I could actually get it to install when I built a VM with it a couple months ago.

YMMV


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 10, 2011, 06:42:32 AM
Eh, I considered that but... torrenting.  We shall see.  I'm still in RMA Hell as far as computer parts are concerned, will be shipping my i5 CPU to Intel this week.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 10, 2011, 04:55:42 PM
So what sort of video card tuning programs are in vogue right now? Specifically, I'm just looking to "fix" my fan settings for my GTX260, as it seems the fans never budge from 40%. I was getting some weird graphics performance in ME3 (artifacting, I think) and I think it may have been the cooling. Case exhaust is still below room temperature, but who knows.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on May 14, 2011, 05:00:30 PM
CentOS comes on eight CDs.  How much of that do I immediately need?  Eventually all of it if I'm going whole-hog into RHEL, but immediately I would expect to only need the first disc to do an installation.  Confirm?

If you unselect everything from the group package selection on install and ONLY choose"base" (under the advanced package selection choice) you can install from one CD. It allows you to bootstrap servers and YUM install/update everything else.

If you go with the defaults you need like 1/3/4 or something like that, and that changes if you choose a GUI setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 15, 2011, 09:09:11 AM
So what sort of video card tuning programs are in vogue right now? Specifically, I'm just looking to "fix" my fan settings for my GTX260, as it seems the fans never budge from 40%. I was getting some weird graphics performance in ME3 (artifacting, I think) and I think it may have been the cooling. Case exhaust is still below room temperature, but who knows.

Your first step is to download RealTemp (http://www.techpowerup.com/realtemp/). Run the RealTempGT executable has a GPU heat monitor. Play a game or two and then see what the temperature is. Also look up the temp thresholds for the GPU. I'm guessing if you're hitting the low 90s, that's normal, but above that, you have an issue. That's a speculative guess.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 15, 2011, 09:53:53 AM
Actually, it appears the issues were specific to one or two rooms - as soon as I left the room, the problem went away. The room was Anderson's on the Citadel.

I have a monitor gadget running, and sometimes when I alt-tab out in the middle of a game, I see the GPU temps in the 50s or 60s. For reference, the GPU is current at 41c, PCB at 34c, more-or-less idle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 15, 2011, 09:56:45 AM
GPUs have way higher heat tolerance than CPUs, so your temps are actually very very good. You may simply have such a good ventilation system or the games your playing are so light on your GPU that the fan just isn't kicking in. I know mine doesn't even start to thrum at all till I get past 80C.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on May 15, 2011, 11:14:42 AM
Well, it's a 895mb (heh, oddball memory) GTX260, which wasn't even top of the line when I build the system, and I play with settings fairly well-cranked.

The card itself exhausts a bit, and that has felt pretty warm before, but you're probably right. I was concerned since when I was poking around online, I'd heard plenty of people say that the drivers suck in a way since they never adjust the fan.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on May 15, 2011, 10:34:59 PM
Well, it's a 895mb (heh, oddball memory) GTX260, which wasn't even top of the line when I build the system, and I play with settings fairly well-cranked.

Doesn't mean anything.  Tolerances on cards are sloppy, old technology can run hot or cold compared to the latest and greatest, and the way a component performs under stress is seemingly never linear.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 16, 2011, 08:15:09 AM
Took me 3 8800GTXs until I got one with properly installed memory heatsinks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 15, 2011, 09:25:19 AM
I made some HTML and I have some links to files for download.  A .ODC and a .XLSX, both of which work fine in Firefox but in IE8 the .ODC shows up as XML (I think) and the .XLSX comes across as a .ZIP.  This is annoying and I'm not suspecting the Apache server since it works as expected in Firefox.  So, are my IE8 MIME types fucked?  What do I do?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 15, 2011, 09:41:03 AM
Don't use OpenOffice?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 15, 2011, 09:55:30 AM
Corporate Apache server, corporate workstations.  WinXP+MS Office 2010.  I'm hoping it's a IE8 problem and not a httpd problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on June 15, 2011, 10:10:16 AM
I'd say just migrate to IE9 because it fixes the issue but your all WindowsXP

Ran into it before and it's an aggravating issue, hopefully you can push a fix out via group policies. Try changing the setting under the security settings -> misc ->  Open files based on content not file extension. Make sure you modify the correct zone too or add your site to the trusted sites and modify that zone.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 15, 2011, 11:09:46 AM
Are you linking directly to a file on the server or are you linking to a download script?  If you use a download script you can modify the headers and force the file to download/save instead of attempting to open it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 15, 2011, 11:29:28 AM
A quick google on it indicated that I can modify the headers, but I didn't want to do that.  I also have nothing to do with the rumored Win7 rollout, or group policies, or even any inclination to open a RFC to restart the Apache app. :why_so_serious:

So I added a note saying if there is a problem downloading the file, use Firefox or email me for a copy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on June 15, 2011, 11:32:35 AM
Has anyone built their own computer overseas before? More specifically Japan? My job there starts in August and it will be the first time in a while I have a legitimate cash flow to spend on a PC. The problem is I'm on Kyushu, so going to Akihabara and getting parts a la carte isn't really an option (if I wanted to do that anyway). Are there any vendors that are good on shipping overseas, or even within Japan? I don't know if using Newegg is a great idea incase I need to RMA something and send it back.

Just looking for input, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 15, 2011, 11:47:24 AM
Order the parts from amazon.co.jp?

These days I buy most of my computer components from Amazon (US) cause I don't have to pay sales taxes like I do with Newegg :awesome_for_real: and 2 day shipping is free for me (Amazon Prime).




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on June 15, 2011, 01:04:12 PM
I'm looking to see if I can RMA through amazon, or if it makes me sent it back to each vendor.
I could imagine that being a problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on June 15, 2011, 09:30:32 PM
Seem to have worked it out, finalllly. *crosses fingers)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 17, 2011, 03:31:15 AM
Anybody got advice on ripping dvds and transferring them to single media files? I've got a martial arts DVD I want to split up for my own purposes and I haven't managed to get anything done. I've tried using dvd decrypter and handbrake, but all I end up is a mess with no video and the wrong audio channel (Jap instead of English).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2011, 04:20:04 AM
Not sure why Handbrake isn't generating any video but for the audio you need to pick the correct stream if you want to get English rather than Japanese. I don't remember how to do that in Handbrake but DVD Decrypter can do it you are in IFO mode and fiddle with the Stream Processing selections to write out a VOB with the Japanese audio track (and other non-English tracks) removed. Also if you care about quality and/or don't care about file size you can use DVD Decrypter in IFO mode to write a single file VOB which pretty much any MPEG-2 player can read. Note that if you keep it as a VOB you don't need to strip out any of the audio streams as you can just select between them in your MPEG-2 video player assuming it has that capability.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 17, 2011, 05:59:37 AM
Thanks Trippy, think I got it working. The makers of the DVD messed things up and despite having two sound channels have duplicates of some scenes with both channels being either English or Japanese!

Edit: Next question. When I watch the converted mkv/vob/dvd on Vlc I get compression artifacts (at places with rapid movement). I don't get any when watching the DVD with WMP. Any advice?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2011, 08:37:57 AM
Increase the video bitrate and/or do a two-pass VBR encoding. Or just write out a single VOB file in DVD Decrypter as that doesn't do any transcoding.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 17, 2011, 11:05:49 AM
These days I buy most of my computer components from Amazon (US) cause I don't have to pay sales taxes like I do with Newegg :awesome_for_real: and 2 day shipping is free for me (Amazon Prime).
I'm in exactly the reverse situation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 20, 2011, 07:05:15 PM
Was doing some disk space management when I noticed three things taking up lots of space that I don't like -

1) DA:O. Bought it on Steam and installed to my large partition. Unfortunately, the program sees fit to still toss stuff in my user folders on my system partition. As I still want to hang on to the install for now, I'll let it be...
2) An "Installer" folder, which seems to hold a ton of files for downloaded system patch executables. The folders all have completely garbage names, such as "{B6CF2967-C81E-40C0-9815-C05774FEF120}", and I'm wondering if I can nuke this folder. At about 800mb, I'd like to.
3) Under "Software Distribution" there's some downloaded stuff, specifically a 880mb cab file called windows6.1-kb976932-x64. What is this, and do I need it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 20, 2011, 08:13:30 PM
#3 is Win 7 SP1 .

You can remove those windows patch installers if you want, but you might not be able to properly rollback updates.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on June 21, 2011, 02:21:43 PM
Not exactly a tech question, but now that my 360 has RROD I need to send it back to msoft for servicing. My 360 only RROD after a system update and I don't want to pay for something Msoft might have screwed up. Anybody have any feedback with getting their 360s repaired (its out of warranty)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 21, 2011, 02:37:53 PM
Fairly certain that when you go to the xbox website and file a claim for the RROD they'll let you know the cost.  Anything under 100 bucks and I would jump all over it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 21, 2011, 02:50:45 PM
#3 is Win 7 SP1 .

You can remove those windows patch installers if you want, but you might not be able to properly rollback updates.



Welp, I guess it's a good thing all my updates work, and I see no reason for a rollback any time soon.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 23, 2011, 01:53:24 PM
I have a new video camera which does not use tape.  This is fantastic, really, but new to me and my tired brain.  Without using the software that came with it, I'm copying off some .mts files which seem to be "AVCHD Video" according to Win7.  Supposing I purchase some BluRay authoring software, am I going to need some intermediate conversion software or is this standard enough that I might expect to hit the ground running?
You shouldn't need to convert it as AVCHD is the standard format used on Blu-ray right now so any relatively recent Blu-ray authoring program should support it directly (ancient ones might only support MPEG-2).


I'm back to this.  I sort of gave up on completing the rebuild of my computer but since I have lots of .mts videos on a hard disk here, I wanted to burn this to BD anyway.  Turns out the software that comes with my camera does not recognize a simple pile of files.  It is geared toward pulling the data directly from the camera and burning directly or storing it into some mysterious dir structure, so it's useless to me.  Does anyone have any suggestions on a software to use to edit/burn .mts to BD?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 23, 2011, 10:07:03 PM
I have a new video camera which does not use tape.  This is fantastic, really, but new to me and my tired brain.  Without using the software that came with it, I'm copying off some .mts files which seem to be "AVCHD Video" according to Win7.  Supposing I purchase some BluRay authoring software, am I going to need some intermediate conversion software or is this standard enough that I might expect to hit the ground running?
You shouldn't need to convert it as AVCHD is the standard format used on Blu-ray right now so any relatively recent Blu-ray authoring program should support it directly (ancient ones might only support MPEG-2).
I'm back to this.  I sort of gave up on completing the rebuild of my computer but since I have lots of .mts videos on a hard disk here, I wanted to burn this to BD anyway.  Turns out the software that comes with my camera does not recognize a simple pile of files.  It is geared toward pulling the data directly from the camera and burning directly or storing it into some mysterious dir structure, so it's useless to me.  Does anyone have any suggestions on a software to use to edit/burn .mts to BD?
If your "mysterious dir" structure is actually the Blu-ray folder structure (BDMV, CERTIFICATE) with all the metadata files plus the video files you might able to use something like ImgBurn, which is donateware, to burn the disc. It's made by the same guy who did DVD Decrypter:

http://www.imgburn.com/

I don't know if there are any good free tools for Blu-ray mastering starting from just the raw video files. If you don't mind a commercial product you could try the Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD trial:

http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/moviestudiope



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 24, 2011, 05:20:01 AM
I'm not yet so destitute that I won't pay for a good tool. :awesome_for_real:

Anyway, when I manually copied the files from the camera, I just put them into a dir, and I didn't copy off any metadata.  There wasn't much and I assumed it was not necessary for editing/burning the vids, so I'm interested in a tool which doesn't need the metadata.  Otherwise I suppose I'm boned, but that seems nuts.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on June 29, 2011, 03:25:58 PM
Okay, this is bizarre.  My Windows 7 computer is showing that there is "limited connectivity" with the little caution icon in the task bar yet the internet works just fine.  Any thoughts?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 29, 2011, 03:29:50 PM
It may be from some other network adapter you aren't using but have enabled (e.g. second Ethernet port, Wi-Fi, Firewire connection, etc.).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on June 29, 2011, 03:43:22 PM
Is it something you think I need to fuck with, or just ignore?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 29, 2011, 03:48:23 PM
Run the network diagnostics and see if it provides further info.

Control Panel>Network & Sharing Center>Change Adapter Settings>Right-Click on adapter, select Diagnose


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on June 29, 2011, 06:42:35 PM
No dice. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 30, 2011, 07:17:56 AM
I generally disable all network adapters I'm not using, have you tried that? Properties for the adapter you're using showing anything?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 30, 2011, 03:13:21 PM
Is it a computer that moves around a lot between network connections?

Deleting multiple networks usually helps just about any networking issue with those types of computers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 02, 2011, 10:20:22 AM
Hmm, so I bought some DVDs, but they're Region 2 discs. My Xbox, predictably, wouldn't play them. However, my PC also wouldn't play them without changing my drive to Region 2 (still had 4 changes left), and I'd rather not do that unless absolutely necessary.

Are there any easy workarounds to this? I purchased these completely legitimately, so I have no compunction with circumventing the moronic region locking system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 02, 2011, 12:21:35 PM
Hmm, so I bought some DVDs, but they're Region 2 discs. My Xbox, predictably, wouldn't play them. However, my PC also wouldn't play them without changing my drive to Region 2 (still had 4 changes left), and I'd rather not do that unless absolutely necessary.

Are there any easy workarounds to this? I purchased these completely legitimately, so I have no compunction with circumventing the moronic region locking system.
A few options:

* Install DVD43 and see if that will patch out the region code on-the-fly

* Rip the DVD with DVD Decrypter with it set to strip out RCEs and then burn that image to a disc so your Xbox can play them

* Flash your DVD-ROM drive with region-free firmware assuming you can find such a thing for your drive




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 02, 2011, 10:58:43 PM
I should have been clear-er...I don't need to Xbox to actually play the discs at this point - I can either watch on the PC or enable the desktop to stretch onto the TV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 02, 2011, 11:23:30 PM
Doesn't change my reply.

DVD43 is the easiest option if it works. Writing an ISO image or burning a new disc with RCE removed is the next easiest. Writing new DVD-ROM firmware is the last resort.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on July 10, 2011, 08:31:04 AM
Is it a computer that moves around a lot between network connections?

Deleting multiple networks usually helps just about any networking issue with those types of computers.

It's a desktop computer that stays put and only has one network.  It just started doing it recently. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 10, 2011, 09:20:26 AM
Sometimes viruses change your proxy settings. Could you have recovered from a virus attack recently, but this element remains unchanged?

Go here:

Control Panel > Internet Options > Connections > Lan Settings. It should all be blank. If Automatically Detect Settings is checked, this may be ok too, but to test the problem uncheck it and see if that clears the problem. If so, the proxy settings in registry may have been hijacked.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ghost on July 11, 2011, 10:12:14 AM
Interesting.  I'll check that when I get home tonight.  Thanks.

I don't know where I would have gotten a virus.  I don't use that computer for anything but watching porn.   :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 18, 2011, 01:59:26 PM
Ok I have to ask for help.

A number of weeks ago a very small, personal MYSQL instance of mine went boom and I've been in the process off/on of trying to recover without a backup.  I don't know why the backups (dump) did not work, suffice to say all I have is the ibdata1 and ib_log0 files (and maybe other stuff, but no export dump).

I have another host running to monkey with and I'm fresh out of options.  I'm up to stopping MYSQL, dropping in the 2 files, changing their ownership to root and then re-start to see what happens.

Does anyone have any advice?  Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 18, 2011, 02:01:21 PM
What do the log files say when you try to start up the server?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 18, 2011, 02:30:26 PM
server will no restart :(  I am going to try again tonight and change permissions to root.  Are there logs created even on attempting to start and it hangs?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 18, 2011, 02:51:49 PM
What OS (don't say Windows)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 18, 2011, 03:25:04 PM
Sorry Sir -- Ubuntu (10.04)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 18, 2011, 03:44:27 PM
Look in /var/log. On mysql startup it normally writes to syslog. If there's an error on startup it should show up in there. There may also be log files starting with mysql, there might even be a /var/log/mysql directory depending on your setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 18, 2011, 11:47:13 PM
got mysql running again with the files copied over, but while I know ibdata1 has the original data (since I checked a copy with an editor), the db isn't showing up.  I wonder, is there some --force  table create syntax I can try? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stewie on July 30, 2011, 12:19:38 PM
I wasn't sure where to put this so its in general for now.

Out of the blue one of my HDs has stopped being recognized by my system.

It was hosting a minecraft server and it just disappeared. I was at work when it happened, was not doing anything with my system, no changes to my system and had been running fine for ages.
My system now does not recognize it at all anymore. I have swapped the cables with a different drive that was working. After doing that the other drive works but this one still does not recognize. So I know its not the cables.
I cant imagine its my jumper, its sata2 and again nothing has changed at all.

I have booted into bios = does not see it.
It is definitely spinning but its just like its not there at all.
I really don't care if the drive is pooched but i want the data off of it.

Any advice??
It is a 200 gb samsung. (was one of 4 hd's)
I have a msi p55 mobo
running win 7 64bit



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: CmdrSlack on July 30, 2011, 01:24:16 PM
You could try to get an inexpensive enclosure from a big box store and see if that doesn't work.

I have the HD from an old machine in one. It was nice, I grabbed what I needed, then formatted the drive and now use it as a local backup drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 30, 2011, 01:25:03 PM
You probably want to have this moved to the Quick Tech Questions thread in the PC Console Gaming forum.

The problem seems to be a failed controller on the hard drive itself. The good news seems to be that there's no mechanical failure (no broken motor or reader needle), but the bad news is that you're probably going to have to ship it to a HD repair place, and those can get expensive. They normally have local offices that then ship your HD to a lab for repair.  Some place like this: http://www.dataretrieval.com/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on July 30, 2011, 01:27:04 PM
Does the drive spin up when you put power to it? Are you running a UPS? Have you given it a "thump" against the palm of your hand?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stewie on July 30, 2011, 02:02:39 PM
It definately has power and is spinning up. I am not using a ups and I have tried the good old fashioned thump.

I think engels may have it right. I'm gonna try my buddies exrenal enclousre. If that doesnt worj I'm not sure what I'm going to do but I'm not willing to spend on out as its just an old 200 gb hd


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 30, 2011, 06:41:07 PM
just making sure you covered all the cheap options first, did you try plugging it into a different sata port on your mb?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stewie on July 30, 2011, 08:59:57 PM
Yup, and tried that. I actually swapped the cables it was using one that was working. The borked drive still didn't work but the other one worked fine with the sata cables that were previously plugged in to the borked drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 30, 2011, 09:29:42 PM
Have you given it a chance to completely cool down?  How much would you be willing to spend on it to get the data back?  Most likely it is going to be a few hundred to get your data off of it, if it is just the controller board that is.  Hard drive recovery gets really expensive when it hits the "need to swap out the heads phase", at that point it can run several thousand and you still don't usually get all your data back.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on August 04, 2011, 05:17:23 PM
My Kaspersky Anti-Virus is expiring today. Should I renew or is there another program that's considered the tits? NOD32?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 04, 2011, 07:24:03 PM
Surprisingly, MS Security Essentials isn't bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 04, 2011, 09:07:41 PM
Surprisingly, MS Security Essentials isn't bad.
Define 'not bad'. We had a virus in the computer lab that was at least 6 months old that MSSE wouldn't even detect. Not simply 'not stop', but not even notice. Other AV could stop it cold. This was about a year ago, tho. Things may have improved.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 04, 2011, 09:47:11 PM
I've always been told that all AV have holes. MSSE works great* as long as I turn off the real-time monitoring.  Otherwise it's a performance drag.  Other AV are too intrusive or too flashy, while MSSE just does its thing quietly.

*I don't get viruses, as a general rule, so YMMV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 05, 2011, 06:50:28 AM
It's true.  Every AV suite has something stupid it will miss.  That's why I use Malwarebytes, Stinger, and others to do scans as well.

MSSE would on occasion boot up in some CPU hogging state.  Killing the front end would always fix it for me in those cases (the protection is still running).  You could relaunch and it'd be fine.

I used to love McAfee Enterprise, but that started having performance issues only Norton could top, and I dumped them on all personal machines after their update that nuked any machine that was logged into.  The only reason I survived that with sanity intact was because I was trialing MSSE on my own at the time and many of our group machines I had set to update later in the day.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on August 05, 2011, 12:01:16 PM
What camera do I buy? No special requirements, just inexpensive and won't fall apart.

Or, if it's easier - what brand of camera do I be sure to not buy?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 05, 2011, 04:26:33 PM
I bought a Logitech c525 recently while it was on sale at Staples, and I haven't had any complaints. Installed seamlessly in W7, and does what I need it to do.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on August 05, 2011, 06:56:07 PM
Sorry, I mean a point and shoot camera. For taking photos.

This brand Vivitar seems to be cheaper than everything else on the websites I've looked at, but I've never heard of them. Avoid?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 05, 2011, 07:07:37 PM
Vivitar made their name selling cheap (relatively speaking) SLR camera lenses and have expanded into other related areas. No clue about the quality of their digital P&S cameras.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on August 06, 2011, 02:15:49 AM
All I can tell you about Vivitar digital cameras is that DPReview (http://www.dpreview.com/) doesn't even have a Vivitar section in their reviews... which isn't a good sign.

If they're cheap, they're cheap for a reason. Caveat emptor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MuffinMan on August 06, 2011, 08:04:14 AM
I received a Vivitar digital camera a few years ago for Christmas, it was the biggest piece. Pictures looked terrible, batteries would die after ~10 pictures. Things may have changed since it's probably been close to 5-6 years since then but I ended up tossing it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on August 07, 2011, 05:49:22 AM
Just took some videos at a martial arts grading. Now I need free video editing software and to learn how to edit videos. Help please?

I guess I can use PS for stills editing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on August 07, 2011, 10:28:51 AM
Windows Movie Maker.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on August 15, 2011, 11:49:06 AM
Just dumped half a cup of coffee into my blue G15... it's dead.  Really sad day, typing this out on a $12 keyboard until I can get a new decent one in next month's budget.  /sigh


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 17, 2011, 07:46:15 AM
So for the latest version of netflix on the ps3 how the F do I get to my queue?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 21, 2011, 01:12:13 PM
So in preparation for getting a new graphics card I cleaned out the inside of my PC for the first time in 9 months (:ye_gods:) and gave it a good full on clean and tidied up the wiring a bit as well. Pulling apart a bit also inspired me to try and get the front audio panel working since I never managed it when I first put all the shiny new innards (ASUS P6T motherboard) into my old case (Antec P160). Welp I failed but having spent a few hours researching and trying different shit I still can't figure out why. In fact previously the front audio jacks were registered but it wouldn't acknowledge any devices being connected. Now I can't see the jacks at all whether as disconnected or disabled in the windows playback devices. I should mention this has come up as well because I've actually started using Skype recently and it's a pain in the ass disconnecting the speakers to plug in my headphones. It should be simple as there's a front panel set of pins on the motherboard and the case comes with a standard 10 pin plug to use.

Now things I've tried: I've set the Front Panel sound as both HD (which it was originally) and AC97 as I can't seem to find out which the case actually is. Done this for every other thing I've done too. Have tried connecting the individual pins (the case plug also has all the wires splitting off as individual connections in case the motherboard isn't standard). This step was complicated by the fact that the labels for the pins in the motherboard manual differ from what the case manual tells you to connect to (case says MIC pin into mic power, MIC BIAS into mic pin. Seems more similar to the AC97 connection labelling for the motherboard). It's back to the standard 10 pin plug in it but the front panel jacks are gonesville. Have I just possibly fubared it totally? Can't seem to find anything on google beyond the relevant manuals. I'm wondering if I could do the individual wiring thing if I had a better idea of what should go where (i.e. matching labels), I'm also wondering if the 10 pin thing is set up for a non-standard board/the P6T is non-standard (doesn't seem to be).

tl;dr Front audio isn't working on an Antec P160 case and ASUS P6T motherboard. Have tried a few fixes and would appreciate someone pointing me at something other than the manuals with a solution or that will let me educate myself enough to solve it. Failing that slowly explaining what to do with diagrams would also be appreciated by simply monkey brain.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 21, 2011, 01:57:16 PM
Couldn't you just use Y-splitters to have speakers and headphones use the same output port?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 21, 2011, 02:00:22 PM
Hmm... Hadn't really considered that, certainly an option. I guess I'd rather get everything working, since I've already got it and can't see why it isn't working. I'd also like to be able to plug in the headphones and get the speakers muted rather than switching them off when I want to use the headphones. If I can't solve it 'properly' though that'd do the trick for the major annoyance and isn't something I can go too wrong with. Cheers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on August 21, 2011, 05:30:20 PM
  2
  4
  6
10

1: Analog Port 1 - left channel (Microphone)
2: Ground
3: Analog Port 1 - right channel (Microphone)
4: Active low signal that signals BIOS that an Intel® HD Audio dongle is connected to the analog header.
5: Analog Port 2 - right channel (Headphone)
6: Jack detection return for front panel (JACK1)
7: Jack detection sense line from the Intel® HD Audio CODEC jack detection resistor network
8: No pin
9: Analog Port 2 - left channel (Headphone)
10: Jack detection return for front panel (JACK2)

http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-015851.htm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 22, 2011, 12:49:21 AM
Hmm... I think I've mostly solved it actually following a bit of advice I found setting the Realtek Audio manager to disable front panel detection (a setting that I had to hunt around a bit for). The result is that the front mic and headset work, they just don't cause the rear plugged things to mute so I've got to turn off the speakers when using the headphones. Not really a problem there, though it seems the front panel is AC97 or something as the sound isn't as nice as the rear connectors. Thanks for the diagram anyway Sheepherder.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on August 22, 2011, 12:33:59 PM
AC97 sound is shitty and lacks the ability to automatically configure itself.  I hate those goddamn manufacturers that label shit as "Intel compatible" when it's the AC97 connections present rather than the Intel Azalia/HD.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 22, 2011, 01:59:24 PM
Couldn't you just use Y-splitters to have speakers and headphones use the same output port?

Before I got my AX Pros that utilize the digital optical, this is what I used for all my other headphones and speaker combos.  Works well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 26, 2011, 09:53:27 AM
I need some help.

I got my RMA'ed mainboard and am using my RMA'ed CPU, and they are doing the same thing that the previous parts did.  Which is the CPU fan spins for a split second and it powers down.  It repeats this each second or two.  Having built this using two different CPU and two different mainboards, it must be something else.  Frankly I am the end of my brain rope.  Any idea which rabbit hole I need to poke my head down?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on August 26, 2011, 09:55:56 AM
Given your propensity for frying PS3s and various other home electronics, I'd start looking at your electrical situation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: kildorn on August 26, 2011, 10:02:20 AM
That does sound like a power drain issue to me. The system is supposed to rev up fully on boot, then head back down to normal operation. If it's unable to fully rev, it may be browning out.

Do you know what the board make/model is, and I presume it's completely unbootable (can't even get to bios in that state and such)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 26, 2011, 10:14:25 AM
I need some help.

I got my RMA'ed mainboard and am using my RMA'ed CPU, and they are doing the same thing that the previous parts did.  Which is the CPU fan spins for a split second and it powers down.  It repeats this each second or two.  Having built this using two different CPU and two different mainboards, it must be something else.  Frankly I am the end of my brain rope.  Any idea which rabbit hole I need to poke my head down?
Is your MB mounted properly? Try powering it up with the MB outside of the case.

And make sure your heatsink is attached properly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 26, 2011, 10:25:53 AM
I need some help.
http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCategory.aspx?SubCategory=72&name=UPS

Do you have another power supply you can use to check the mobo/cpu?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 26, 2011, 12:11:40 PM
Smells like failing PSU, but I like Trippy's idea of a poorly mounted board. Make sure all the risers are in place and that you're not accidentally shorting out the mobo on the backplate. Also, if that doesn't do it, and you've tested it with a different PSU, see if it behaves the same at a different location with different power. It could be that your home's power is 'unclean'. This can be solved with a UPS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 26, 2011, 02:39:44 PM
I resolved the frying problem, it was a very tired power strip behind the AV center.  This was in a different location anyway.

It could be power but my PSU should be more than adequate, a high-watt OCZ jobber.  So it didn't cross my mind, frankly.  Might be lacking voltage on some particular line, but I have plenty of cables to fit into all the sockets.  So what I'll try next is taking it out of the case.  My previous main/CPU works just fine in this new case but maybe something is shorted.

It's a ASUS P7P55D Pro with a i5 processor and four Crucial sticks.

I've removed and installed this Zalman HSF unit enough times that I have it down to a science.

I'll come back later.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 27, 2011, 09:25:13 AM
So having mostly ignored it I discovered the reason my 1TB drive hasn't been showing as a location for backups it has been flagged as a system drive by Windows (and is marked as a boot drive by MiniTool Partition, W7 doesn't seem to think it is). Checking the volume descriptions of the drives in Device Manager it seems like both are marked as Master Boot Records. Any idea how I can get W7 to stop treating that drive as a boot drive and go back to just using C:? I can't help but feel booting off a separate drive to my W7 installation might be slowing things down a touch. More importantly I'd like to be able to actually make back ups as I don't seem to have enough space on any of the other drives.

Edit: Just checking, W7 sees F: as the System drive and C: is marked as Boot, Page File and Crash Dump. Like I said C: is the W7 installation partition and certainly used to be system disk. The physical disk is marked as disk 3 though, I don't know if that's going to have an effect.

Although when I try to make run Windows backup it tells me I should have a drive with 859.99GB of free space, which seems like a lot for a backup. Is something more screwed with this than just the boot thing? If I'm going to get an SSD to use as a new OS drive I'd like to be able to just copy the present installation over and I'm really not sure if I can at the moment.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 27, 2011, 10:35:48 AM
Dude, to be honest,what you're describing sounds like a mess. I don't know how a spare drive got marked as a system drive. Can you post a screenshot of the disk manager layout? Also, if it weren't for the scary part where your computer seems to think its a system drive, I'd just format it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 27, 2011, 11:18:18 AM
Well I decided to be an idiot and it looks like it was a relatively simple fix that involved pulling the other drives and running a W7 disk startup repair on my C: drive. I suspect I had the boot priority in BIOS checking the F: drive first and, either when this happened or just eventually, W7 made it the boot drive :uhrr: This may have involved something I did at some point but I remember when F: suddenly stopped being available for running backups and the reason it confused me so much was because I hadn't been messing about or even installing anything prior to it. The labelling as a system drive I just don't get at all (like I said MiniTool was registering it as a boot drive rather than a system one, it had the system on my C:). So no screenshot (I probably should have made one for posterity).

So that much is sorted out, I'm now seeing whether this has done anything to me needing 859GB of free space to run a backup. I strongly suspect that Windows keeps trying to make a full copy of everything on all my hard drives but that just seems like such a :uhrr: option that I'm assuming it isn't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 27, 2011, 01:30:34 PM
Actually, it probably is just that. Windows imaging backup software isn't the smartest design I've encountered. I'd see about getting Acronis or something else. If you end up getting an Intel SSD, that comes with an intel licensed acronis download that burns to an CD or USB flash drive that will then let you clone your HD to an SSD without having to futz with a whole backup program. I cloned my 200GB OS to my new 250GB Intel 550 SSD without issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 27, 2011, 01:59:53 PM
Yeah, I think that's what I'll end up doing. Since sorting out the weird partition assignments I've been able to back up and it apparently doesn't require a TB of space to do so. Hopefully this will speed up the system bootup a bit or something. I will keep in mind the Intel SSD thing, I think that would really be the best upgrade I could give my system in the near future.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on August 28, 2011, 11:04:47 PM
It could be power but my PSU should be more than adequate, a high-watt OCZ jobber.  So it didn't cross my mind, frankly.

Last time I checked OCZ was selling some pretty dodgy shit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 29, 2011, 06:23:13 AM
It could be power but my PSU should be more than adequate, a high-watt OCZ jobber.  So it didn't cross my mind, frankly.

Last time I checked OCZ was selling some pretty dodgy shit.

I'm not ruling out the idea that the PSU isn't suited to the new mobo/cpu.  In fact, I am inclined to think it's not up to the latest standard.  I will need to check the age of the thing, probably more time has passed than I think.  It works great with the old unit but that only makes me think there isn't a short behind the board.

I can report some success, having stolen Sky's research and gotten that MSI P67A-GD65 + i5-2400 to replace my wife's machine's innards.  I also noted some slight differences in the PSU connections on her 750W Corsair.  Specifically, her EATX connector is a single eight-pin block where I seem to have two four-pin blocks.  Plus my main power has a supplemental four-pin block while hers is a single block.

Today I will see about wrapping up the ASUS RMA cross-ship and order a new PSU.  In between gassing up the car, taking clothes to the dry cleaner, attending a parent-teacher meeting, maybe some work, and posting on F13. :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Talpidae on September 04, 2011, 11:53:53 AM
Anyone got Desktop Scanner reccomendations ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: RUiN 427 on September 07, 2011, 09:37:10 AM
Is there such a thing as easy to use vent hosting/renting? If so, which of the multitude of sites should I look into? I don't have an extra computer to host myself. I'm just looking to host about 5-10 people.

Thanks in advance


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 07, 2011, 08:01:46 PM
Typefrag is pretty much the gold standard in vent hosting services. I have heard their web panel works well.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: RUiN 427 on September 07, 2011, 11:18:51 PM
Typefrag is pretty much the gold standard in vent hosting services. I have heard their web panel works well.



Indeed it does. I couldn't resist the ridiculously cheap part either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 13, 2011, 07:37:19 AM
Need some ideas troubleshooting an issue with my computer. Occasionally it hard locks in a very weird way where any program running can still be used, but explorer freezes so no other programs can be run. I have to hold down the power button because pushing the reset button just gets it to hang at posting. I originally thought it was my SSD (Corsair Force 3 60GB) since the HDD activity light goes solid, but even after flashing the firmware the issue still happens. My next thought was my Wireless N usb adapter being plugged into the USB 3.0 port, so I switched it to 2.0, but that didn't work either. All drivers are updated as they were installed from the website and the computer is only 2 months old.

I'm at a loss, so any ideas would be great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 13, 2011, 07:44:41 AM
Isolate the RAM?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 13, 2011, 07:54:33 AM
I can try that. Problem I'm having is recreating the issue, it doesn't happen with any consistency though the Dead Island helper program seemed to trigger it. I'll pull a stick of RAM out tonight and see if I can get it to happen again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 13, 2011, 08:13:42 AM
Keep Task Manager up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on September 13, 2011, 12:03:01 PM
I feel stupid for not thinking to do that. Will do and see what's going on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: luckton on September 21, 2011, 10:32:12 AM
Quick question: I changed my forum avatar here, but it's supposed to be animated.  It shows up animated when I uploaded it to Imgur, and on my computer, but here, still frame.  How am I failing?

Edit: Nevermind, fixed it.   :drill:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on September 21, 2011, 01:50:35 PM
Edit: Nevermind, fixed it.   :drill:
You could go ahead and unfix that at any time.





 :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 21, 2011, 11:32:59 PM
If you use Firefox then Adblock lets you block specific images.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on September 22, 2011, 09:03:33 PM
Just started using Windows again after years, and I downloaded  MSE + EMET, and set UAC to max. Do I need an additional firewall? Someone suggested Zonealarm.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 23, 2011, 03:45:30 AM
Oh gods, no.  Just don't be an idiot about opening ports and there's no need for anything more than Windows Firewall.

Zone Alarm is just a friggin' hassle that causes more problems than it prevents.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on September 23, 2011, 06:58:04 AM
Oh gods, no.  Just don't be an idiot about opening ports and there's no need for anything more than Windows Firewall.

Zone Alarm is just a friggin' hassle that causes more problems than it prevents.

Great thanks. I think it was casuing BSOD's so I uninstalled it anyway.

Any tips on how to properly navigate Windows 7? I feel like I get to everything the long way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on September 23, 2011, 12:54:25 PM
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Keyboard-shortcuts


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 28, 2011, 07:07:29 PM
Can anyone on Comcast recommend a solid, compatible cable modem I can buy instead of being billed out the ass by them for renting one?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 29, 2011, 01:47:55 AM
I used a Motorola SB6120, not only was it easy to set up on my end, it was easy on theirs as they had a script. Only not using it now as I dropped Comcast.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 29, 2011, 07:20:10 AM
Can anyone on Comcast recommend a solid, compatible cable modem I can buy instead of being billed out the ass by them for renting one?

Last time I had Comcast, the difference in price between owning and leasing the modem was $3 a month.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 29, 2011, 07:55:02 AM
It is now $7 per month.  With the modem costing $80 through Amazon, it should pay for itself in a year.  If it doesn't break, that is.

The more absurd thing is the $16/month HDDVR rental for the TV.  That finally made my mind up to dump TV.  We'll hit a bar for sports, otherwise I'll have to look into Roku or something else.  Frankly, I won't miss TV at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 29, 2011, 10:41:01 AM
The modem rental was always $7 a month, but they changed their pricing a few years ago to where the base rate for people with a rented modem was $4 or $5 less than the base rate they charge people who use their own modem. A buddy of mine was pissed because they made the change about a month after he had bought a replacement modem because his died (which cable modems do relatively often).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 29, 2011, 06:36:02 PM
Fuck if I know.  Their setup is so goddamn complicated, I think for internet only they had nine different 'bundles'.  I got something like $20/mo for 12mo, then $35/mo for 12mo for a 2yr contract.  15mb down, 3up. 

There were so many different offers and bullshit... I'm not sure what is wrong with just being upfront about your business.  I mean, they're the only cable company in town.  When you have a monopoly, does it matter how convoluted you can make it?  Fuck no, just charge the shit out of everyone.  Boardwalk, motherfuckers. 

I was able to get a surfboard and wireless router shipped from Amazon for $120.  Hopefully they last. 

I'm leaving Uverse, which has been absolutely awesome.  It is one of the only things I'll miss about Ohio.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 01, 2011, 05:15:35 AM
Just got a Surfboard last night due to electrically fried equipment.  Cost $60 at Frys, and after calling them to get the MAC put into their system, works fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 01, 2011, 10:02:01 AM
What's a surfboard again? Don't tell me to google Surfboard :P


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 01, 2011, 10:30:45 AM
Motorola Surfboard.  Think my model is a SB5101 or something like that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on October 06, 2011, 11:48:52 PM
I've been using my TV as a monitor, but its a 720p 32 inch and I can\t read shit on it, although the BF3 beta looks good. Windows sayings its outputting 1920X1080, but my native resolution is only 720p, I'm just curious what this means and if it is worth spending the dollars for an actual monitor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 06, 2011, 11:52:50 PM
I've been using my TV as a monitor, but its a 720p 32 inch and I can\t read shit on it, although the BF3 beta looks good. Windows sayings its outputting 1920X1080, but my native resolution is only 720p, I'm just curious what this means and if it is worth spending the dollars for an actual monitor.
I would assume your TV advertises that it accepts 1080p signals but then downscales them to 720p.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 07, 2011, 07:53:25 AM
Yerp.

Give it a 720p signal if you want to read teh text, but the UI is usually huuge in 720p (my old "George" tv was 720p). 1080p is a mixed bag, even on a big monitor (65"), it's 95% awesome all the time, but there are the outliers where the text is just too damned small and a game won't let you scale the UI (pretty much Anno 1404, can't think of another).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 07, 2011, 09:13:33 AM
So anyone own a TV for PC gaming that doesn't make fonts and so forth look blurry? I'm pretty picky, and that's why I've stuck with expensive 21-26" IPS panels, but I'm considering, vaguely, a thirty something TV if, and only if, it doesn't make PC output look like blurry ass.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 07, 2011, 10:10:55 AM
I've got a 40" Bravia KDL 40W4500 that's great.

You have to tweak AA settings and resolutions on some games - main problem being that at native res (1080p) fonts are too small to read from normal TV viewing distance. Would be fine if I was 1m away but I'm 3m away usually. Games with a lot of important text I tend to crank the res down and play with AA options til they're readable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 07, 2011, 01:11:29 PM
I read f13 just fine from my sofa about 9' or 10' away (varies as I move furniture seasonally) at 1080p. Even the little "Hey, Sky, you have 4569 messages" is easily legible. It's a 1080p display, but has a bit of overscan, so the nvidia driver compensates making it 1824x1026, which hasn't been an issue with anything, really. Pixel perfect, sharp text.

http://www.amazon.com/Mitsubishi-WD-65638-65-Inch-3D-Ready-HDTV/dp/B003HIPKR0

(under a grand!)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on October 07, 2011, 04:35:33 PM
I use a 40" samsung 1080p lcd tv I use as a monitor in Spring, nice and legible. I set it to 'just scan' and it looks great


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 07, 2011, 09:54:07 PM
For reading stuff out of games just crank windows DPI up to where you need it. Only problem with that is it fucks with lots of games, so you usually end up trying to find a "fullscreen windowed" work-around.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on October 08, 2011, 07:31:17 AM
So anyone own a TV for PC gaming that doesn't make fonts and so forth look blurry? I'm pretty picky, and that's why I've stuck with expensive 21-26" IPS panels, but I'm considering, vaguely, a thirty something TV if, and only if, it doesn't make PC output look like blurry ass.

Almost any 1080p TV should be fine as long as it has a 'just scan'/no overscan setting (which almost any modern set does).  Just make sure that your TV and PC are set at 1920 x 1080 with no overscan and you should be fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 08, 2011, 12:10:21 PM
Good info. Thanks all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on October 10, 2011, 12:16:04 AM
I'm having connection issues. We have two computers hooked up (wired) to our router. Mine is fine, but my girlfriend's has been losing internet connection periodically. We only really notice it when playing WoW, since that's all she really does on it, but it knocks her whole connection out (can't browse web pages, etc.) when it happens so I don't think it's a bad addon or something. Our router is only 6 months old so that shouldn't be the problem. My other thoughts were maybe the onboard network card is going; the PC is about 4 years old now. Not really sure what else it could be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NowhereMan on October 10, 2011, 01:32:39 AM
I had similar problems a few months back, I kept network connection but lost internet connectivity. Turned out it was my wireless adapter acting up, replacing that sorted it out and if you're not having any problems with then her network adapter seems a likely candidate.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on October 10, 2011, 01:41:57 AM
New issue that has popped up on my PC over the last 3 days or so:  keep getting a warning that my 12v rail is only putting out something like 10.7 volts.  Not within normal spec.  Haven't noticed any adverse effects, other than a single shutdown.  I am trying to figure out what could be causing it by process of elimination...I don't think I have too many devices running on my machine for the PSU (nor am I sure that can even cause that problem).  Might have too many things plugged into the outlet?  That seems a possibility, but then I wonder why I haven't seen the problem before.  Are there any other explanations you guys can come up with, other than a bum PSU?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 10, 2011, 05:42:19 AM
Too many things on an outlet should not have any effect on the voltage coming across. You may be severely under-voltage in your house as a whole, but if you were under-voltage enough for the transformer in your PSU to not output enough DC voltage you would notice it in other things like the lights being dim/flickering.

I am guessing it is either your PSU, or the sensor that is taking the reading.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 10, 2011, 07:13:42 AM
It took me a while, but one Corsair HX750W PSU later my rig is again operational after... I don't know how many months.  Since the OCZ 750W works with my old mainboard setup, I think I'll put that into the old chassis and get it running.  Ubuntu, I guess.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 13, 2011, 05:24:13 PM
New internet setup issues:

We setup the new cable out here in Seattle through Comcast.  We are only using internet, no cable TV at this point.  Motorola Surfboard SB6121 and a router Medialink Wireless-N. 

Any device that is wireless can download and upload just fine, 20mb down, 2.5mb up.  That includes phones, PS3, two notebook computers. 

My PC, which is hard-wired to the router, can download just fine but when I try to upload anything (attach to email, speedtest, etc..) it fails and kicks only my computer off the network.  Then I have to reboot my system to get it to recognize the network again. 

I removed the router from the network and connected just the modem only directly to the PC and I'm still getting the same issue.  Comcast is saying that all is well on their side. 

Is this driver-related on my side?  Or where do I start troubleshooting this?  Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 13, 2011, 06:20:13 PM
It is almost definitely an issue on your machine if you are not having issues using the connection through the router on other machines and your computer exhibits the same issue when connecting to the modem directly.

What OS are you running?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kail on October 13, 2011, 07:21:04 PM
I'm having some kind of annoying video card issue on my laptop.  It's running an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 card, and worked fine up until Rage came out, but then wouldn't run Rage.  Carmack says "update drivers, noob" so I do, but the thing still won't run Rage, and now I'm getting video issues with all my other games, too.  Mostly just extremely low quality textures on everything (regardless of what the video options are), but there's other weird glitches like objects flickering or framerate that's maybe 1/10 of what it used to be in some games.

I'm thinking this is a driver issue, but I've tried reinstalling them, uninstalling them, redownloading them, and every combination of the above I can think of and it's still a problem.  The way ATI is telling me to do this is to go into control panel, uninstall the video driver, reboot, and then reinstall it, but I've tried this a number of times and no dice.  Am I mucking something up in the installation process, do I have to wait for ATI to release a new driver, or does it sound like a problem with something else?  Anyone know?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 13, 2011, 07:58:12 PM
It is almost definitely an issue on your machine if you are not having issues using the connection through the router on other machines and your computer exhibits the same issue when connecting to the modem directly.

What OS are you running?

Win7 64 Pro.  I replaced the ethernet cable going from router to PC, no effect.  It's a four year old MB with integrated ethernet... I wouldn't think there was a newer driver for it, but that's the only logical thing.  I also tinkered with Windows firewall and my AV/AS programs, turning them off one-by-one, to no avail.  It's a confounding issue. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 13, 2011, 08:48:11 PM
What OS are you running?
Win7 64 Pro.  I replaced the ethernet cable going from router to PC, no effect.  It's a four year old MB with integrated ethernet... I wouldn't think there was a newer driver for it, but that's the only logical thing.  I also tinkered with Windows firewall and my AV/AS programs, turning them off one-by-one, to no avail.  It's a confounding issue. 

Couple things you may want to look at:

Go into your network and sharing center, click on the bench/house/office building next to your connection and in the Set Network Location window, click the "merge and delete multiple networks", delete all of them that are not listed as active.

Open a cmd window as administrator (Search: cmd, right click and run as administrator) and type in the following command "netsh winsock reset" . This will rebuild your Windows networking stack.

Those two usually resolve most odd network connection issues with Vista/7 if it is a windows problem. Your NIC might be the problem, might want to download the driver, uninstall it entirely and then re-install from scratch after a reboot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 13, 2011, 09:34:35 PM
Well thanks for putting me in the right direction.  The first two didn't help, so I went diving for an updated driver.  Best I could find was a 2007 LAN driver for this board (again, it's 4 years old).  I DLd it and uninstalled the one that was in place, then rebooted.  Unfortunately, the driver wasn't recognized by Win7 when I tried to install it, so Win7 installed the Aetheros in its place.  For giggles, I tested it and it works perfectly. 

So it's a roundabout fix, but a fix nonetheless.  Thanks again.  I owe you a beer. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on October 16, 2011, 06:12:16 AM
Welp, I'm still having blue screens, though they're showing up less. I did happen to run CPU-Z and find that my DRAM Frequency is at 665. If my RAM is listed as 1333 MHZ, shouldn't the DRAM Frequency reported be that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 16, 2011, 08:28:08 AM
I'm thinking this is a driver issue, but I've tried reinstalling them, uninstalling them, redownloading them, and every combination of the above I can think of and it's still a problem.  The way ATI is telling me to do this is to go into control panel, uninstall the video driver, reboot, and then reinstall it, but I've tried this a number of times and no dice.  Am I mucking something up in the installation process, do I have to wait for ATI to release a new driver, or does it sound like a problem with something else?  Anyone know?
Have you tried reverting to a previous version?  The new drivers might just be crap, in which case reinstalling them won't do much for you.

Welp, I'm still having blue screens, though they're showing up less. I did happen to run CPU-Z and find that my DRAM Frequency is at 665. If my RAM is listed as 1333 MHZ, shouldn't the DRAM Frequency reported be that?
That is a half-step.  Not sure if it's really running at that speed or what though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 16, 2011, 11:52:10 AM
Welp, I'm still having blue screens, though they're showing up less. I did happen to run CPU-Z and find that my DRAM Frequency is at 665. If my RAM is listed as 1333 MHZ, shouldn't the DRAM Frequency reported be that?
DDR-double data rate :) 665*2


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on October 16, 2011, 01:36:49 PM
DDR-double data rate :) 665*2

Well then, don't I feel stupid. Thanks!

In the process of looking into this I think I solved my own problem. Motherboard was auto setting the RAM voltage to 1.590 instead of 1.5. Googling tells me this RAM usually goes unstable after 1.570


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 17, 2011, 12:38:54 AM
Well then, don't I feel stupid. Thanks!

In the process of looking into this I think I solved my own problem. Motherboard was auto setting the RAM voltage to 1.590 instead of 1.5. Googling tells me this RAM usually goes unstable after 1.570

DDR cycles at the high and low of the clock cycle, if you're at all curious as to why it's twice as fast as the clock.

Normally 1.5v is the design spec for DDR3-1333.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kail on October 17, 2011, 07:46:29 AM
I'm thinking this is a driver issue, but I've tried reinstalling them, uninstalling them, redownloading them, and every combination of the above I can think of and it's still a problem.
Have you tried reverting to a previous version?  The new drivers might just be crap, in which case reinstalling them won't do much for you.

Yeah, thanks, that seems to be working better.  I didn't realize you could still get the old drivers!

There was some weirdness going on with everything running at sub-10 fps for a while, and then the card deciding to override the software video options to shift everything to low quality, but in a flurry of scrubbing, I think I deleted whatever was causing the major problem.

Rage still doesn't work, but I'm not poking anything for a while.

Thanks again :D


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on October 17, 2011, 12:06:54 PM
I've set my forth mouse button to be my push-to-talk button in Teamspeak. It works great in games.

I start surfing and it becomes my page back and push-to-talk button. How do I make it not be a page back button?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 17, 2011, 12:16:37 PM
Might have to install the mouse software? Is there a setting in the control panel for extra buttons? The driver probably auto-assigns them (thus needing the software to expose them if windows isn't).

I use the same button, but then I like to use the back and forward buttons in mmo for pet attack/back off...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 17, 2011, 01:52:32 PM
Forth?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 17, 2011, 01:55:34 PM
Forth?

Its the 'go forth and prattle on yonder TS server" button. Jeeze.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on October 21, 2011, 05:30:46 PM
Okay downloaded Witcher 2 on Steam tonight. Tried to run it and my lap top threw a hissy fit.

I have a Lenovo T500 which according to manufacturer is supposed to have "switchable" graphics between a on board Intel chip set and the ATI Mobility Radeon 3650.
Checked hardware under control panel and ran dxdiag. Some how, some where the ATI 3650 has disappeared. And the ATI catalyst control center refuses to load since its not detecting an ATI GPU.

Any idea how to fix this or nail down if the ATI gpu fried itself at some point with out my noticing?


UPDATE
Edit: Nevermind fixed it. This is rich. Supposedly it shipped with these switchable graphics but neither the BIOS or Power Manager installed at shipment allowed you to actually switch to using the ATI gpu card. So after flashing my bios and updating the power manager and driver it seems I am actually using the gpu card for the first time in two years. Funny that the Intel IGA on the board handled past games like Dragon Age.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on October 27, 2011, 01:56:17 AM
I\ve finally gotten the energy to overclock my CPU after finding that my GPU wont unlock, much to my dismay.

Ive never overclocked anything before, so I was hoping there was some easy guide to doing it right. I\m on air with a zalman heatsink, and an Asus z68 board with an i5 2500k


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 27, 2011, 07:06:20 AM
I'm an MSI convert based on my P67 board. I was going to get into an OC on my i5 2500K, but it was late the night of my build. So I skeptically pressed their magic "OC Genie" button and booted into a stable 4.2GHz OC on a hyper212.

So you'll have a bit more tweaking to get there, but you should easily break the 4GHz barrier with a zalman.

A quick google pulled up this guide (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/01/07/how-to-overclock-the-intel-core-i5-2500k/1) for the P67. Should be similar enough to get you going, or maybe dig a bit deeper for a Z68 article.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on October 28, 2011, 10:01:20 AM
I'm an MSI convert based on my P67 board. I was going to get into an OC on my i5 2500K, but it was late the night of my build. So I skeptically pressed their magic "OC Genie" button and booted into a stable 4.2GHz OC on a hyper212.

I remember having to set jumpers on the board in arcane sequences that denoted timing relationships between various devices derived from an incomprehensible table in the board manual.  That sounds much easier.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on October 28, 2011, 11:48:33 AM
I'm an MSI convert based on my P67 board. I was going to get into an OC on my i5 2500K, but it was late the night of my build. So I skeptically pressed their magic "OC Genie" button and booted into a stable 4.2GHz OC on a hyper212.

So you'll have a bit more tweaking to get there, but you should easily break the 4GHz barrier with a zalman.

A quick google pulled up this guide (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/01/07/how-to-overclock-the-intel-core-i5-2500k/1) for the P67. Should be similar enough to get you going, or maybe dig a bit deeper for a Z68 article.

Z68 should be practically identical since the UEFI for ASUS's Z68 boards is pretty much identical to the one used on their P67 boards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 28, 2011, 01:15:40 PM
I was kind of looking forward to the GUI BIOS, but it's more intrusive than anything and it's not really changing interaction, because it's still basically keyboard driven text menus underneath. Just a few mouse clicks to get there, instead of just backing out with the keyboard (which you're already interacting with).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Vision on October 28, 2011, 08:17:32 PM
I'm an MSI convert based on my P67 board. I was going to get into an OC on my i5 2500K, but it was late the night of my build. So I skeptically pressed their magic "OC Genie" button and booted into a stable 4.2GHz OC on a hyper212.

So you'll have a bit more tweaking to get there, but you should easily break the 4GHz barrier with a zalman.

A quick google pulled up this guide (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/01/07/how-to-overclock-the-intel-core-i5-2500k/1) for the P67. Should be similar enough to get you going, or maybe dig a bit deeper for a Z68 article.

This guide just sort of says what settings to use to get a stable 4.5 overclock, however I always thought you wanted to go up in increments? Or should I just copy the settings according to that guide?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 28, 2011, 11:47:49 PM
You're less likely to hurt the motherboard and CPU by doing it incrementally, unless you're terrible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on October 29, 2011, 06:02:29 AM
Overclocking isn't really that helpful, I could see doing it as a last resort as your gear gets old though.  Hopefully at that point if you start breaking things it isn't as big of a deal to rebuild.  Since most video cards come overclocked nowadays I usually download all the oc software just to lower them down to stock so that I don't have to hear the fan stress out.

Unless you're doing encoding and such I also don't think overclocking the cpu will be usefull, it won't do anything to improve your video game experience.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on October 29, 2011, 03:56:04 PM
Except, it can make a huge difference in games.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 31, 2011, 07:22:19 AM

This guide just sort of says what settings to use to get a stable 4.5 overclock, however I always thought you wanted to go up in increments? Or should I just copy the settings according to that guide?
I did say 'quick google'. Go find guides written to your chipset and learn them. Then do incremental increases and test for stability/heat.

If you want easy, go buy the MSI board with the button. Otherwise, you need to do you some learnin'.

To echo rattran: a solid OC on the cpu can get you some good performance gains. As long as you have the proper cooling, why not? A properly cooled OC will last you longer than a poorly-cooled stock.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 06, 2011, 05:58:40 PM
Getting ready to move soon, so could use some advice on power inverters and UPSs. Going to need someone to cover my PC, TV, 360, networking equipment.

Advice on brands and stats would be nice - no real idea on how big I need to buy to cover everything adequately. Will be buying through the Egg.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 06, 2011, 08:19:04 PM
Are you taking a desktop PC or a laptop?

With the exception of the TV (and if it is a desktop PC) it is best if you just purchase a new power brick if the one your device has cannot handle 220v. In most cases these days, the transformers in the power brick can actually handle either 110/220 and the only thing you may need to buy is a new cord to go from the wall to the brick.

With a desktop PC, the little red switch on the power supply should be all you need to make it work on 220v systems (i.e. not in the Americas).

If you can get everything to work with 220v input power, then just purchase a UPS designed for their system (outlet types etc) when you get there would be my recommedation.

Buying a transformer to turn international power to u.s. is going to be expensive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on November 06, 2011, 08:36:30 PM
then just purchase a UPS designed for their system (outlet types etc) when you get there would be my recommedation.


Where he's going I dont think they have neighborhood computer stores or Best Buys. Just a guess.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 07, 2011, 08:40:52 AM
Yes, we're talking Desktop and TV (plus speakers, the monitor, networking gear, other little things).

I'm fairly the the desktop can switch over to 220v, but not sure about the others. Don't think the TV has an actual brick (thinking it's internal), monitor I know does not have one. Same with a few other things.

Also, while I CAN actually buy a 220v UPS when I get there, I'm not sure how trustworthy they are. And once I get there, I can not easily order this stuff from the US (has internal batteries, exceeds my volume/weight limits) without getting reamed by FedEx or something.

ALSO - the local power grid is...suspect, at best. I really cannot afford to lose components to dirty power if I can avoid it at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 07, 2011, 09:03:51 AM
ALSO - the local power grid is...suspect, at best. I really cannot afford to lose components to dirty power if I can avoid it at all.
Say hello to Yegolev when you get there.

 :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 07, 2011, 05:28:51 PM
So, unless folks have suggestions, I guess I'm buying that that's rated 1000w or 1500w+ in order to make sure i can handle everything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 07, 2011, 05:55:00 PM
Sounds good to me. Just make sure it has a quiet fan and enough of the type of connectors you want.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 07, 2011, 08:58:57 PM
So how much wattage should a 40" LCD TV take up?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 08, 2011, 06:52:24 AM
Really depends on age and model, anywhere from 75 to 200 or so.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on November 08, 2011, 07:08:03 AM
My wired 360 controller causes my computer to hang when posting if I leave it plugged in. Unplug it, no problems. Any suggestions on what to check in the bios to fix this? Checked to see if it was trying to boot from it, but that's not the issue. Tried different USB ports too. The odd thing is the first player indicator flashes when this happens.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 08, 2011, 08:03:11 AM
Disable legacy devices in the BIOS?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on November 08, 2011, 11:44:39 AM
Disable legacy devices in the BIOS?
Yar.  My board hangs during POST if I leave 'Legacy USB Support' enabled with my keyboard attached.  Kind of a pain in the ass because I need to swap a PS/2 board in to enter the BIOS.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: NiX on November 08, 2011, 05:54:11 PM
That did it. Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 17, 2011, 12:23:17 PM
I'm seeing semi-regular slowdowns on my PC.  It does, of course, not do it as much if I stop most of the running programs but I would like to pinpoint what it is.  Resource Monitor tells me I have IO spikes on C:, which is very annoying since I am now running on a SSD.  I can't seem to remember what is the best route to isolating this, or maybe I'm imagining that we covered this topic in the past.

Said spikes:
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/85916/pc_io1.png)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on November 18, 2011, 09:14:47 PM
Okay need help with a hard drive problem. My main drive partition has 137 gigs in memory. Saw in the SWTOR thread that the game will require about 20 gigs for installation, so I decided to check how much space on my drive I had left. It was only 17 gigs in free space left.
I thought "maybe I should uninstall all the programs I dont use anymore" but then I noticed my installed programs only took up around 20 gigs. So I thought maybe I should move my pics and documents to a back up drive, but they were only using up about 12 gigs.

So how can I find out what is eatting up a 100 gigs of my hard drive and clean it up?
Yes I've run the basic windows cleaner and the disk defragmentor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on November 18, 2011, 09:17:26 PM
http://windirstat.info/ (http://windirstat.info/)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on November 19, 2011, 07:55:16 AM

So how can I find out what is eatting up a 100 gigs of my hard drive and clean it up?
Yes I've run the basic windows cleaner and the disk defragmentor.

I can tell you now that it's your windows restore points.  Under the cleaner go to the advanced tab and somewhere in there is an option to delete all but the last restore point.  Click it and *boom* 100gb+ free.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on November 19, 2011, 08:59:28 AM

So how can I find out what is eatting up a 100 gigs of my hard drive and clean it up?
Yes I've run the basic windows cleaner and the disk defragmentor.

I can tell you now that it's your windows restore points.  Under the cleaner go to the advanced tab and somewhere in there is an option to delete all but the last restore point.  Click it and *boom* 100gb+ free.

I'd already done that. It only grabbed me an extra 15 gigs. Im now at 27 gigs total free.
Im downloading CCleaner and and the program Furiously recommended. Going to see how much that gets me.

Last option will be moving all documents and photos to backup HD, and doing a clean install of Windows during which I will upgrade from Vista to 7.


Edit:
CCleaner got me to 42 gigs free.

Edit 2:
Looks like Windirstat.info is going to grab me another 20 or so gigs. Biggest culprits were DDO leaving 5 or so gigs of installation files on my computer after installing the game. Shouldnt a program auto-delete its installation files after installing itself?  :uhrr: And a gargantuan Outlook mail folder and back up mail folder averaging 8 gigs each.  :ye_gods:


Edit 3: At the end of a very long day I managed to go from 15 or so gigs left on the HD to freeing up over 50 gigs of space.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on November 20, 2011, 07:23:20 PM
Shouldnt a program auto-delete its installation files after installing itself?  :uhrr:
Heavens no. :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on November 21, 2011, 12:41:24 AM
Shouldnt a program auto-delete its installation files after installing itself?  :uhrr:
Heavens no. :ye_gods:

Okay I'll bite, why not? Why do I need the downloaded 4 gigs of installation files sitting on my HD taking up space after the program is installed?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 21, 2011, 07:49:49 AM
I like to have them for when I set up my next pc. My stash of installers has come in handy more than once. You can always manually clean them out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 21, 2011, 01:30:02 PM
Protip: Update your SSD firmware.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 22, 2011, 09:13:48 AM
Protip: Update your SSD firmware.

Yeah, but be careful with that. Although I know some of the newer Intel SSDs allow for a fimrware update without wiping the drive, many of them still completely reset the drive, wiping the contents out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 22, 2011, 01:01:18 PM
Protip: Update your SSD firmware.

Yeah, but be careful with that. Although I know some of the newer Intel SSDs allow for a fimrware update without wiping the drive, many of them still completely reset the drive, wiping the contents out.

So true.  Luckily I only had a Win7 image on it; or not, I don't think I'd use a SSD as general storage.  In any case, the Crucial C300 manages to go from rev 0006 to 0007 without data loss.  IO spikes gone, and I would have done a reinstall to fix that.  Even better, it operates much faster now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 22, 2011, 01:13:30 PM
I looked at getting a couple of more SSD 60gb hard drives last night in order to put them into a RAID 5 setup as my main OS disk. Really, still $100 each? Sigh.

Currently have 3 7200rpm 80gb HDs in RAID for my main disk, guess I'll keep that for now - but I can't get a Windows score over 6.1 with it!

My single SSD 60gb'er is where I install my games, which seems to work pretty well but I think that overall performance would go up if Windows was installed on the SSD instead ... anyone disagree with that? (If I feel like making this change, I would probably install the OS on my SSD and then change Program Files to point to my RAID).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 22, 2011, 02:17:23 PM
Try putting your pagefile on your SSD:

(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/82194/pagefile.JPG)

In the above image, the pagefile is on the C drive, which is the default location. You can manually put it on the E drive or whatever drive letter your SSD uses. Also, remove it from your C Drive. That should give your OS a performance boost.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on November 22, 2011, 04:51:54 PM
I thought it was bad to have the page file on the SSD because the frequent read/writes wore it down quick?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 22, 2011, 10:31:21 PM
I thought it was bad to have the page file on the SSD because the frequent read/writes wore it down quick?

Well, if that were the case, then any of us who are using an SSD as the system's single drive are hosed :) Honestly, everything I've read regarding the rewritability of SSDs is inconclusive. Some people are convinced that an average SSD won't last more than a few years, others do something else with the math and estimate that even with constant use, SSDs will outlast conventional hard drives. Maybe someone else knows more on the subject, or can point to a more conclusive study than I have found.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on November 23, 2011, 04:41:35 AM
The most convincing stuff I've seen is that you can expect, at worst, 4-5 years of heavy use from an SSD used as a cache.  The argument goes, in 4 or 5 years though SSD will be 4-6 X larger for the same price so you're going to want to buy a new one in 4 or 5 years anyway so who cares if it only lasts 4 or 5 years?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 23, 2011, 08:18:31 AM
Performance-wise, my config currently is OS on SSD, pagefile on some other 7200 RPM disk.  After I flashed the SSD fw, the boot time and general operation is pleasantly fast across the board.  The C: i/o seems to revolve around constant updates to the system files, so my thought is installing Win7 on a SSD will get you the most performance from it, not by using it as a data store.  I also have 8GB of RAM which has a big impact, reading game data from the platter disks one time being more efficient than ongoing r/w.  So far I haven't done any noticeable paging... I say noticeable because I expect Win7 will page something just to do it.  But the usage is always 1% when I check it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on November 23, 2011, 09:29:12 AM
My old 19'' monitor seems to be giving up the ghost slowly but steadily. So I am window shopping for a replacement. Probably a 22''(ish).

I have never bought a new monitor before, I always just used old ones my father replaced, so is there anything I should now about technical details when I buy a new one ?

At the moment I run a Geforce 9600 GT which runs even Skyrim just fine (will see about SWTOR this weekend  :awesome_for_real: ) What would be a cheap upgrade for this one ?

edit to add: Btw, what max. resolution should I be aiming for in regards to monitor and videocard ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on November 23, 2011, 10:32:59 AM
For that vid card, stick to 1920x1080 max. Also, define cheap as far as replacement vid card goes?

With regards to monitors, what's your budget and how picky are you about image quality and viewing angles? That's the biggie, since you have to go from a TN (twisted pneumatic) monitor to an IPS (In Plane Switching) monitor to get that fab Apple monitor type image. If its just for gaming, Asus is probably gonna do more than fine. If you're gonna watch a lot of video, say as a replacement for a TV, then IPS may be of interest, although the pricing is higher.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: fuser on November 25, 2011, 09:08:19 AM
For that vid card, stick to 1920x1080 max. Also, define cheap as far as replacement vid card goes?

With regards to monitors, what's your budget and how picky are you about image quality and viewing angles? That's the biggie, since you have to go from a TN (twisted pneumatic) monitor to an IPS (In Plane Switching) monitor to get that fab Apple monitor type image. If its just for gaming, Asus is probably gonna do more than fine. If you're gonna watch a lot of video, say as a replacement for a TV, then IPS may be of interest, although the pricing is higher.

Dell is selling a newer 24" e-IPS monitor, as a part of the black friday sales for $299 (http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-2676&baynote_bnrank=0&baynote_irrank=0&~ck=baynoteSearch). It's LED and not the normal p-IPS the refresh rate suffers slightly but a good price (review (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/47128-dell-ultrasharp-u2412m-24-ips-monitor-review-9.html)).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on December 02, 2011, 08:54:18 AM
I have an answer without a question. I've wanted so simplify my speaker setup for a while, one of my friends is making TinyMix (http://www.amazon.com/Stoweblank-TinyMix/dp/B005WEES3Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1322845072&sr=8-1) Little stereo mixers for 4 sources through 1 set of speakers, isolated sources, consistent volume. Simple, pricey, works. Now I have 5.1 for my desktop, and use the same fronts for stereo from the server without pops and distortion. Which frees up a  bit of room on my crowded ass desk.

Hooray, and make sure you use the f13Amazon link (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/f13-20) if you decide to try. Full Disclaimer: I get no kickback or anything for this, just a guy I know irl.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 03, 2011, 12:58:14 PM
For that vid card, stick to 1920x1080 max. Also, define cheap as far as replacement vid card goes?

With regards to monitors, what's your budget and how picky are you about image quality and viewing angles? That's the biggie, since you have to go from a TN (twisted pneumatic) monitor to an IPS (In Plane Switching) monitor to get that fab Apple monitor type image. If its just for gaming, Asus is probably gonna do more than fine. If you're gonna watch a lot of video, say as a replacement for a TV, then IPS may be of interest, although the pricing is higher.

Dell is selling a newer 24" e-IPS monitor, as a part of the black friday sales for $299 (http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-2676&baynote_bnrank=0&baynote_irrank=0&~ck=baynoteSearch). It's LED and not the normal p-IPS the refresh rate suffers slightly but a good price (review (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/47128-dell-ultrasharp-u2412m-24-ips-monitor-review-9.html)).

Or go with a dell 23" IPS for even less for a bit less resolution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 03, 2011, 09:00:24 PM
Is it just me, or have UPS not really improved any over the last 10 years? 1 minute backup time for $180? really? come on ...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on December 04, 2011, 10:34:52 AM
So here's an interesting question.
Came into the office today to fire an employee and get some work done.
Computer was running really slow. Hit ctrl-alt-delete to check task manager and I see a program called hki1480834.executive running in six instances. Additionally another program fafIj4cj.com is running in two instances.
Tried Googling both and came up empty.
Booted to safe mode and am running scans. So far nothing more than 19 tracking cookies.

Anyone know what those two programs are?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 04, 2011, 10:44:04 AM
I'd guess malware, but I'm not 100% positive so don't do anything rash yet!

.com file was a big red flag, as they are similar to .exe files, but are often used by malware creators to confuse users thinking it is a .com internet address suffix. 

There are also types of malware that create random filenames to prevent their filenames from being searched and properly reported.  That's likely why you didn't find those filenames on a search.

Again, I'm not an expert and I can't recommend ripping them out.  But I am suspicious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 04, 2011, 04:47:30 PM
Likely random names generated by malware.  They do that so there is no way to "google" an easy solution.

What are you using for a virus scanner?  Likely it's either too new to be in virus definitions, or it turned off or added exceptions to your scanner.  Try downloading malwarebytes.  Great program, though sometimes hard to find now, because the sites that carry it make you jump through a dozen hoops to download.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 04, 2011, 05:12:47 PM
Try downloading malwarebytes.  Great program, though sometimes hard to find now, because the sites that carry it make you jump through a dozen hoops to download.

www.malwarebytes.org is the official site.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sand on December 05, 2011, 05:49:15 AM
I was running Norton's Internet Security 2011. Not sure why it didnt stop it, or even catch it when I booted to safe mode and did a full system scan.

Ended up downloading and running:
TDSSKiller
Combofix

Those two removed it.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 05, 2011, 11:02:29 PM
Norton didn't detect it because Norton is shit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 06, 2011, 04:39:20 AM
Secret IT tip:  Norton doesn't actually do anything but take up a machine's resources.  It's a placebo that makes you think you feel better.
www.malwarebytes.org is the official site.
They've stream-lined the process a lot.  Last time I tried to do it I had to go through a convoluted mess from their front page.  Then there was that time I had to walk my mom through it when I had no internet access, and things were still convoluted...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lac on December 06, 2011, 11:08:25 AM
ninite.com (http://www.ninite.com) is a great way to get people to download and install a couple of malware scanners without effort or confusion.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on December 06, 2011, 11:40:59 AM
Ok, here's my tech dilemna for anyone who wants to take a stab (my IT dept is stumped).

Windows 7 machine at work. Part of a large corporate network. We use a CRM called Onyx which is hosted at another location. I log in to it through IE8. The site for it is in my trusted domains, and is set to login automatically using my network credentials.

Works perfectly fine for months, and then poof, everything explodes. Something in my system is trying to authenticate me and failing, I end up locked out the CRM. It promptly pops up a login window asking for my credentials, which fail. IT department shows me as locked out for "too many failed logon attempts".

Problem is, we can't figure out what the system is trying to log me in to...

 - Nothing in event manager showing failed logons anywhere that I can see; no items in event manager corresponding with the frequency of the issue at all
 - IT has determined the logon attempts are coming from my machine, but can't track what its trying to log in to
 - only PC I have used Remote Desktop to log in to in the past is turned off.
 - only network share is one setup by the system, and even though I am currently locked out of the CRM, I can access that share just fine right now, along with the rest of the local network and the internet - only issue is with accessing anything from a remote site.

It's not specifically the CRM I am being "locked out" of, it's the network. If I log off right now, I won't be able to log back in until they clear the lock.
As soon as they clear the lock, I'll have full access to everything again, CRM, Intranet, etc.
Anyone have any ideas on how to trace what I am specifically failing to log in to?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 06, 2011, 12:05:45 PM
We had a similar problem with Dreamweaver accessing subversion using ldap, our passwords expire every 90 days and the only way to update the subversion password in DW w/o locking our accounts was to disconnect from the network before opening Dreamweaver and updating the password.  Apparently on a failed auth attempt DW immediately retries and does this until it times out.  

This probably is not your problem but I am sure Dreamweaver isn't the only well written bit of software out there that does this.  So some program or service on your computer has an old password and is repeatedly attempting to authenticate you with it.  

Try looking at the networking tab in the windows 7 performance monitor for requests to your ldap/authentication server then backtrack whatever processes those are to things you have installed.

Once you have that list of suspects see if you can kill the process/parent process and have IT unlock you account to see if you auto relock again, keep killing processes/having IT unlock you until it stops locking you out, then it will probably be the last process you killed.

Alternatively you can try blowing your user profile away and starting fresh.

edit: you could also try clearing your browser history in the off chance there is a cookie with your old password that some web app is using to authenticate you.

edit2:  I bet if you change your password back to the password you were using when you last did not have this problem it would "work", I wouldn't say it was fixed but it would be working...

edit3:  I am also assuming your IT folks have narrowed this down to a problem with your machine, ie shut your machine down, get your account unlocked and manage to successfully access the CRM from someone else's machine.  If this is not the case then none of the above may be pertinent.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 06, 2011, 01:24:08 PM
Also, check your system clock, make sure its synchronizing correctly with a time server. Although some authentication will pass without a synced time stamp, others won't let you in.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on December 06, 2011, 05:28:09 PM
Ok, here's my tech dilemna for anyone who wants to take a stab (my IT dept is stumped).

Windows 7 machine at work. Part of a large corporate network. We use a CRM called Onyx which is hosted at another location. I log in to it through IE8. The site for it is in my trusted domains, and is set to login automatically using my network credentials.

Works perfectly fine for months, and then poof, everything explodes. Something in my system is trying to authenticate me and failing, I end up locked out the CRM. It promptly pops up a login window asking for my credentials, which fail. IT department shows me as locked out for "too many failed logon attempts".

Problem is, we can't figure out what the system is trying to log me in to...

 - Nothing in event manager showing failed logons anywhere that I can see; no items in event manager corresponding with the frequency of the issue at all
 - IT has determined the logon attempts are coming from my machine, but can't track what its trying to log in to
 - only PC I have used Remote Desktop to log in to in the past is turned off.
 - only network share is one setup by the system, and even though I am currently locked out of the CRM, I can access that share just fine right now, along with the rest of the local network and the internet - only issue is with accessing anything from a remote site.

It's not specifically the CRM I am being "locked out" of, it's the network. If I log off right now, I won't be able to log back in until they clear the lock.
As soon as they clear the lock, I'll have full access to everything again, CRM, Intranet, etc.
Anyone have any ideas on how to trace what I am specifically failing to log in to?

Did you recently change your password and forget to change it on a phone or something? 99% of the time when I see this problem it is because of something along those lines. Password change + forgetting to update it on something that is auto-logging you in somewhere.

How sure are they that the failed attempts are coming from that particular machine?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on December 07, 2011, 07:35:52 AM
They've checked twice and keep telling me its coming from my machine, but can't identify what specifically.

Been scanning Resource Monitor, but not seeing anything stand out.

It could potentially be the phone, though if it is I'm going to yell at them about being wrong on the source. Also weird, considering my last password change was at least a month ago. Guess I could have toggled something in wireless settings on my phone recently and not noticed.

Will disable the phone and see what happens...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 07, 2011, 09:34:42 AM
How do they know the source?  Your account, sure, but the source?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on December 07, 2011, 10:53:46 AM
The call is coming from your house! Get out!!!!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bunk on December 07, 2011, 11:51:21 AM
Yep, sure enough, was my phone trying to access the inhouse wireless network. Makes little sense based on timeline of password changes, but telling it to forget that that access point exists has cleared up my issues.

The IT guy's response to my question about the login attempts supposedly coming from my computer? "Well, your phone was beside your computer, right?"
 :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on December 07, 2011, 05:56:33 PM
Yay, I helped. Takes a little sting off of the 8 hour mail outage I had last night.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 07, 2011, 07:00:08 PM
Yay, I helped. Takes a little sting off of the 8 hour mail outage I had last night.  :uhrr:

Did you get to watch the no-progress bar while Exchange rebuilt mailboxes?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on December 07, 2011, 07:03:27 PM
No, 7.5 of the hours were because I wasn't notified. (Backup failed, transaction log drive filled up, stores dismounted.) I should have noticed the backup failure sooner, so still ultimately my fault, but I'm a little cranky that several people didn't open tickets after noticing the outage the night before, I work way better at midnight than at 7 am.

We need way better monitoring too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 07, 2011, 07:11:56 PM
No, 7.5 of the hours were because I wasn't notified.
I hate that so much. Daddy doesn't get mad because you broke something, he gets mad because you don't tell him about it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on December 12, 2011, 03:26:28 PM
So, AVG has killed my laptop somewhat and I'd appreciate any sugegstions on how I can fix it. The problem seems to be a known one and relates to updates for the AVG2011 program on 64 bit windows machines. As it stands the computer will not boot normally, nor will it boot to the repair facility natively, and if I try to boot it into safe mode it gets stuck when trying to load AVGIDSEH.SYS

The AVG support suggests booting to the command prompt (if you can) and then renaming a bunch of avg***.*** files to different names then reeboting. If you cannot access the command line then they provide a bootable script which you can run from a CD/DVD or USB that renames all the relevant files for you, then reeboots your computer, unfortunately this doesn't seem to work for me and if I try to boot from such a USB I get stuck at a screen with 'Missing operating system_' and nothing else happens.

My laptop is technically a work laptop, running Win7, but they have said it will take a while to fix as they have a backlog, and they'd probably just wipe it and reinstall everything, however I need to get some data off, and ideally want this fixed sooner than they can offer. It's an academic institution so they're not too fussy about people tinkering with their machines.

So I have tried:

1) Repair tool - Doesn't boot, goes to a blank screen
2) Safe mode + Command Prompt - Gets stuck at AVGIDSEH.SYS
3) AVG USB repair tool - Gets stuck at 'Missing operating system_'
4) Win7_64 install CD - Lots of CD activity, then goes back to the repair utility and hangs (however I am not convinced the CD was right since it was a copy, also I didn't set CD/DVD to top priority in the BIOS boot order, which I have since read should be done, so this might still be an option)

Things I haven't tried (yet):

1) Building a Win7 recovery CD and booting from that
2) Booting off a linux install on a USB

If I boot to linux off a USB (which I have never done before) would I be able to access my files? I normally have to log into the computer, and I do not know if I will be able to see documents in my documents folder or on my desktop if I try to go around this with this approach, any comments on this would be welcome.

Any other suggestions, pointers, advice or corrections would be most welcome, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 12, 2011, 04:06:21 PM
You should be able to see your files in Linux if you have an NTFS filesystem driver like NTFS-3G installed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on December 12, 2011, 04:09:05 PM
Is that the usual type of filesystem? How should I check?

Do you think booting linux from a usb might be a good solution?

Thanks for the help Trippy.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on December 12, 2011, 04:12:48 PM
Did you try formatting the USB as a startup disk?  I may be leading you entirely astray here it's been years since I've done something like that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on December 12, 2011, 04:28:06 PM
Not specifically, since I didn't have an available .iso of the startup disk.

AVG have a specific rescue utility which you install onto a USB (http://forums.avg.com/ww-en/avg-forums?sec=thread&act=show&id=68967), which doesn't seem to be quite the same as a true startup disk, rather I think it is just a script which renames all the relevant avg drivers to something else so your system doesn't load them. When I download the .zip or .rar I run the setup utility and it loads the files onto the USB, but when I try booting from it it gives me the 'Missing operating system_' error.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 12, 2011, 05:36:05 PM
You need to format your USB stick as a bootable drive of some sort if you expect to boot off of it.  It needs a Master Boot Record or GUID Partition Table for your BIOS to be able to read the rest of the shit on the drive.  This application should do what you want and work for any USB drive. (http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?swItem=MTX-UNITY-I23839)

Also, you should set the drive you intend to boot off of as the top priority, else it may just select your primary drive/partition and continue to attempt loading your fucked up Windows install.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Margalis on December 12, 2011, 05:56:16 PM
My LCD monitor is flickering like a bad florescent light and the menu randomly comes on by itself. Shot?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 12, 2011, 06:09:21 PM
Smack the buttons around a bit, maybe some are stuck?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Margalis on December 12, 2011, 06:27:33 PM
The "buttons" are touch sensitive pads, not actual buttons. I did try messing around with them a bit but to no effect.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on December 12, 2011, 06:37:18 PM
Hit them with a hammer. Then replace your monitor.

Or try to clean them with a cloth first, my samsung kept turning on and off when there was some gunk on the touch button.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on December 18, 2011, 08:51:01 AM
Anyone remember when I was looking to buy a UPS?

Well, it got here last week. I go to plug it into my transformer when I see a problem - the plug is...weird. Turns out it's a NEMA 5-20 spec plug, which I've never seen before, and my transformer only accepts "normal" 5-15 plugs. It looks like I could buy something like this (http://www.amazon.com/Conntek-1F515520-1-Foot-15-Amp-Adapter/dp/B00439KIF6/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1324226943&sr=8-8 (http://www.amazon.com/Conntek-1F515520-1-Foot-15-Amp-Adapter/dp/B00439KIF6/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1324226943&sr=8-8)) to get the right plug configuration...but does anyone thing that'd be a problem? Doesn't seem to me that giving the UPS 15 amps when it can accept 20 amps should hurt anything, but what do I know?

My maintenance guys were ready to perform surgery on the plug to "convert" it to a 15 amp plug, but I'd like to avoid cutting up my expensive UPS if at all possible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 18, 2011, 10:39:18 AM
Likely not a big deal, a few of the UPS manufacturers seem to sell adapters that do exactly that.  Probably will recharge the battery backup slowly though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 18, 2011, 10:46:31 AM
You need to make sure that the UPS you bought can actually handle input current at or below 15A before you go adapting things or changing plugs. You could very easily start a fire if you pull too many amps through a 5-15P (which is why there are different plug types for different amperages).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on December 18, 2011, 12:47:29 PM
Good to know - how would I actually determine that? The UPS is this model: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16842102090 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16842102090) I see frequency measured in hz, but nothing about amperage.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 18, 2011, 03:34:39 PM
Check the label on the side of the ups all electronic/electrical devices say what their electricity use is on that panel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 18, 2011, 06:41:27 PM
Anyone have experience using a mini amp to power good-sized speakers for computer audio? Maybe something along the lines of these two?

Scythe's Kama Bay Amp (http://www.silentpcreview.com/article817-page1.html)
NuForce Icon (http://www.nuforce.com/hp/products/icon/index.php)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 18, 2011, 07:01:15 PM
Anyone have experience using a mini amp to power good-sized speakers for computer audio? Maybe something along the lines of these two?

Scythe's Kama Bay Amp (http://www.silentpcreview.com/article817-page1.html)
NuForce Icon (http://www.nuforce.com/hp/products/icon/index.php)

How big are the speakers? You need to make sure you have an amp powerful enough to drive them. Just as many speakers are blown from being underpowered than are blown from being overpowered.

I used to use a mini-bookshelf stereo as my "speakers" for my computer, used one of the line ins and always got great sound.

For the price of that Nu-Force you could just buy a pair of M-Audio AV40 powered monitors which will probably give you a lot better sound. Or, for less than $100 you could do the Alesis M1Active320USB monitors. I love my M-Audio BX-5s but those are "used" for my turntables so I bought the M1Actives for my PC speakers and am very happy with them, especially for the price (they have the same wattage amp built in as the one you linked). One big advantage to using monitors is that they are always shielded so you can use them close to other equipment and not have magnetism issues, though unless you are using a CRT still you probably would not notice the lack of shielding.

Of course, the whole "some people don't like studio monitor sound" argument Ingmar will bring up comes into play if you go with monitors.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 18, 2011, 07:55:21 PM
They are floor speakers from Bose, 7-8 years old. Just found the manual for them online, and it says they are compatible with 10-200 watt/channel receivers, 4-8 ohms. I believe they are 100 watts.

I got rid of my old 100lb receiver and though I'd hook these up to the comp for playing music through.

The speakers you mention below look interesting though, will look some more ..


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 18, 2011, 10:23:08 PM
I went from $100 Bose PC speakers to M-Audio AV40s about a year ago.  I didn't like their 'boomyness' for the first few days, so I returned them and tried a few other pairs.  I ended up returning them all and went back to the AV40s.  After about a week of use, the AV40s just 'clicked' with me and they are without question the best PC speakers I have owned.  Buy them. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 18, 2011, 11:42:36 PM
Note that M-Audio is now selling newer gimped versions of the AV40 that are cheaper but have less power per channel (15 watts vs 20 watts).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 19, 2011, 12:02:41 AM
Wow, that's shady.  I've got the 20s and they're worth it.  Can't comment on the 15s.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: vex on December 19, 2011, 04:17:11 AM
I had AV-30's  and they just did not last and truthfully I was never really happy with them.  When they did die I decided to move away from the integrated amplifier.  I looked at the NuForce but thought they were pricey.  I ended up with a DTA-100a from Parts Express and a set of somewhat inexpensive bookshelf speakers.  For the price I've been much happier with this combo than any PC speakers I've owned in the past.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 19, 2011, 06:08:09 AM
Wow, that's shady.  I've got the 20s and they're worth it.  Can't comment on the 15s.

You don't necessarily need a big amp when the amp is integrated. You lose a lot of that power over cable runs which you don't have to worry about when the amp is inside there.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 19, 2011, 08:50:36 AM
I ended up with a DTA-100a from Parts Express and a set of somewhat inexpensive bookshelf speakers.

Oo that might be a good option. The M-Audio speakers look nice, but they are bit big to fit on my desk and a bit small to sit on the floor. I'll mockup a box that fits their size and see if I can get them to sit on my desk somehow ..


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 19, 2011, 09:31:21 AM
Get some monitor speaker stands that are height adjustable (they really dhould be at ear level) and put them behind your desk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 19, 2011, 02:58:20 PM
You need to make sure that the UPS you bought can actually handle input current at or below 15A before you go adapting things or changing plugs. You could very easily start a fire if you pull too many amps through a 5-15P (which is why there are different plug types for different amperages).

The cord he intends to buy is purpose-built to do the conversion, it shouldn't ignite.  Just like those dollar store extension cords shouldn't ignite.  How well the transformer or UPS likes it is a question for the manufacturer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on December 19, 2011, 04:35:45 PM
I'd be more worried about the wires in the walls igniting from too heavy a draw.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on December 20, 2011, 11:15:02 AM
Well, the transformer is converting from 220 down to 110.

I asked my maintenance folks at work as well. They didn't seem concerned, for whatever that's worth.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 20, 2011, 11:56:41 AM
I've never seen a maintenance guy get concerned over anything. Ever.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 20, 2011, 01:21:39 PM
I've never seen a maintenance guy get concerned over anything. Ever.

This. Most maintenance guys don't know much about electricity beyond how to change a lightbulb.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 29, 2011, 12:08:23 PM
I am looking to upgrade my monitor from a 20.1" Dell 2005 into a 24" or 27".  Any recommendations?  Usage will be about 50% gaming, 50% web dev/schoolwork.  I'm looking for a good balance between price and quality, if possible. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 29, 2011, 12:12:18 PM
What does "web dev" mean? If you are doing any graphic design work involving color I would strongly recommend staying as far away from TN panels as possible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 29, 2011, 12:16:20 PM
Yeah, I'm in school for design, but just starting to get into my graphics classes now.  What other options are there from TN panels?  CRTs, or something I'm less familiar with?

Upon reading further, is IPS the way to go, then?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 29, 2011, 12:28:25 PM
There are different panel technologies used in LCD displays -- the main ones for desktop computer displays being TN, MVA/PVA, and IPS. If you are doing graphic design work I would get a low end IPS display. Those have the best color reproduction everything else being equal. TN panels are almost always 6 bits per color instead of the normal 8 bits so they have to "dither" the missing colors. The down sides with IPS are that they are more expensive and their refresh rates aren't as good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 29, 2011, 12:30:55 PM
Thanks, reading on that tech now.  It narrows things down a bit.  Any brands stick out as general winners/losers?  Samsung and Dell were both decent when I bought four years ago.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 29, 2011, 12:31:06 PM
Upon reading further, is IPS the way to go, then?
Yes get something like a Dell U2412M.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 29, 2011, 12:33:44 PM
Thanks, reading on that tech now.  It narrows things down a bit.  Any brands stick out as general winners/losers?  Samsung and Dell were both decent when I bought four years ago.
At the low end it doesn't matter much. If you were doing this professionally there are special monitors you can get which cost a lot that have features that make the colors they produce even more accurate.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 29, 2011, 12:36:22 PM
Thanks a ton, that's a great start.  Much appreciated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 29, 2011, 01:05:36 PM
Being a monitor nut myself, what Trippy said.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 29, 2011, 05:32:08 PM
It is too bad we can't sticky inside of a thread. I swear I knew exactly what Trippy was going to say about LCD panels based on the seven or eight other times the topic has come up in this thread.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 29, 2011, 09:29:52 PM
I hate Dell with an irrational fiery passion, but their monitors are pretty sweet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2011, 02:03:35 AM
I just read a review of a Dell 23" e-IPS monitor with a 6-bit display :facepalm: Fucking marketing people. If you want to get an IPS display you'll need to verify that it's an 8-bit display.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 30, 2011, 08:11:02 AM
I tell you, they're cutting corners these days. Wait till IPS becomes a 'buzz word' and they'll be selling any ole crap with the term IPS shoved in there somehow.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 30, 2011, 10:39:21 AM
It already is a buzz word.

I saw some LG panels like that the other day.  $150 for an IPS seems like a great deal, until you read the specs.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 31, 2011, 06:58:44 PM
I just read a review of a Dell 23" e-IPS monitor with a 6-bit display :facepalm: Fucking marketing people. If you want to get an IPS display you'll need to verify that it's an 8-bit display.


not just the 23" I have seen many posts saying that the quality on a u2412 is significantly less than a u2410 (2410 usually sells for about $150 more on Dell's site).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 31, 2011, 07:12:52 PM
Yes the U2412 is apparently a 6-bit display as well. Oh well...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 31, 2011, 07:19:59 PM
Upon reading further, is IPS the way to go, then?
Yes get something like a Dell U2412M U2410M (the 2412 is a 6-bit display).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 01, 2012, 03:50:24 PM
So the machine just packed in.  Not mine, the wifes WoW station.  Big ole blank screen.

Disks fine, memory fine, video and monitor fine.  CPU hot as a motherfucker.  Looked like it just burned itself out.

Cocksuckers.

Now I'm trying to do an in place upgrade of XP without an A drive for the Raid drivers.  Fuck me.

I suppose my question is :  Why does this shit happen to me ?  And does anyone have any bright ideas about the drivers ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 01, 2012, 04:16:47 PM
There's a way to make your own XP install image that slipstreams the drivers but I've never tried it before.

Edit: never even


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 01, 2012, 04:34:57 PM
Yeah, I was hoping to avoid that.  It's one of those 'I only have one Floppy Drive' type deals and I'd rather not rip shit apart.

I suspect a quick linux boot might do it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 02, 2012, 08:31:04 AM
It wont accept a usb stick as a source for drivers during install?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 02, 2012, 02:29:57 PM
It wont accept a usb stick as a source for drivers during install?

Not XP. A solution may be to purchase a USB floppy drive, so long as your system recognizes it as such, you can install the raid drivers from that.

I had a program to make slipstream Winxp cds, but its at work, and I can't remember the name. It was a bit fiddly, and took a bit of  praying, but if that's the only recourse, I can dig it up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 02, 2012, 03:39:21 PM
I got it sorted.  Took more than an hour due to swapping one fucking Floppy Drive about.  Also, the driver disk I made was corrupt the first time.

If this is New Year, you can shove it.

 :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 03, 2012, 10:58:55 AM
Don't use RAID for an xp wow station?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 03, 2012, 02:24:48 PM
Its not about using raid, its about the chipset storage controller, which can be set to raid or AHCI, but regardles, WinXP will need 'pre-os' drivers. Some machines let you go to 'legacy' mode on the controller, which would sometimes let XP see the HD, but most of the times, its either raid or AHCI, and you will need the drivers for it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 04, 2012, 07:39:16 PM
Isn't there a linux client for WoW yet?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 05, 2012, 08:13:12 AM
Isn't there a linux client for WoW yet?
:rofl:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Margalis on January 08, 2012, 08:25:44 PM
My internet connection is super slow all of the sudden. I can't watch streaming video at all and podcasts that used to download in 40 seconds now take 12 minutes.

But if I run a bit torrent client I get the same speed there I always did. Maybe a time of day thing? (I have a cable modem) Is there some way to diagnose whether this is my machine, my router / cable modem or some stop along the way?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 08, 2012, 09:12:05 PM
What numbers are you getting from speedtest.net?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Margalis on January 08, 2012, 09:35:54 PM
Ping: 25ms

DL Speed: 0.57 Mbps
UL Speed: 0.92 Mbps

Definitely not my computer because my 360 can barely load images for the dashboard.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 08, 2012, 10:14:29 PM
Restart your router(s)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Margalis on January 08, 2012, 10:22:07 PM
Tried a bunch of the obvious things, talked to Time Warner, they did something, seems better, will talk to them about line test tomorrow.

Seems like their problem probably.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 08, 2012, 10:22:59 PM


Note the asterixes in the second screenshot?  Those are dropped packets, a large number of those tend to indicate bad news.  Also, I redacted a bunch of hops in the tracert, you should do the same if you post text or screencaps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 09, 2012, 05:36:06 AM


Note the asterixes in the second screenshot?  Those are dropped packets, a large number of those tend to indicate bad news.  Also, I redacted a bunch of hops in the tracert, you should do the same if you post text or screencaps.

Having a dropped packet near the terminus of a trace is not uncommon, all that means is the device doesn't respond to pings. With a trace, having big spikes in time between hops is what is most worrying.

Marsalis: did you run a speed test directly connected to the modem and get different results?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Margalis on January 10, 2012, 05:56:27 AM
It seems mostly better now. Connecting directly to the cable modem didn't make any difference. Guy on Time Warner's end worked some magic remotely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 17, 2012, 08:51:45 AM
Can anyone recommend a good content filter program for Exchange 2003?  Other features are fine, but being able to keep our people from sending out sensitive data is the most important thing.

I wanted to go with CodeTwo's product, but it seems to only be for 2007/2010.  (Their disclaimer product is pretty slick and simple.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 17, 2012, 09:05:27 AM
Does anything support Exchange 2003 anymore?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 17, 2012, 10:07:40 AM
I hope so...

We don't need anything complicated, just the ability to block emails containing a SSN or CC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 17, 2012, 11:44:06 AM
GFI was always best for 2003, but I'm not sure quite what features it has anymore or what you're after.

Maybe using MEHS gateway would work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 17, 2012, 12:33:44 PM
GFI has been forbidden.  I'm after what I said in the previous post.

Ability to block, or redact, any email sent containing credit card or SSN information.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 17, 2012, 12:58:08 PM
Do you have a current spam filter for incoming mail? Your cheapest option might be seeing if you can leverage that for outgoing filtering as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 17, 2012, 01:28:56 PM
Sounds dangerously close to "write a perl script". :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 17, 2012, 01:37:03 PM
HOWDY!

(http://image1.findagrave.com/photos250/photos/2011/62/4498_129922889660.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 17, 2012, 01:50:03 PM
Do you have a current spam filter for incoming mail? Your cheapest option might be seeing if you can leverage that for outgoing filtering as well.
We had a filter.  Then they went out of business a few months ago.  Presumably.  Their web page is still up, but we've been unable to contact them for some time.

A spam filter that can do outgoing is fine, too.  It's just we don't really need spam filtering, so it's already overkill.  At this point, I'll take a suggestion for anything that's reasonably cheap and easy to use, as long as it also meets our (I would think) simple requirements.

Sounds dangerously close to "write a perl script". :why_so_serious:
It is.  Or "write a lexer".  Delving into figuring out how to code for Exchange, SMTP, or whatever probably isn't feasible, either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 17, 2012, 02:57:15 PM
How many mailboxes do you have? Postini (shut up Ironwood  :why_so_serious:) is pretty cheap ($5/user/month with discounts as you go up in accounts) and can do outgoing and incoming filtering. Bonus is that the processing all happens offsite so there's no load on your mail server itself and if your internet goes down, they spool up your mail for you til it comes back again instead of just having it bounce.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 17, 2012, 04:17:59 PM
Off-site is not an option, unfortunately.  I could suggest it were I feeling particularly mischievous or wanting to encourage the boss to have a reason to drink, but it'll be shot down.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 17, 2012, 08:54:39 PM
http://www.mydlp.com/
http://www.clearswift.com/products/mimesweeper-for-smtp
http://www.nemx.com/products/SecurExchange/index.html
http://us.trendmicro.com/us/products/enterprise/scanmail-for-microsoft-exchange/
http://www.vircom.com/en/products/

It's all my Google-fu and almost complete ignorance of the topic could turn up.  MyDLP is open source and apparently their Microsoft Exchange help info is under construction, so probably not an easy solution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 17, 2012, 11:15:45 PM
I would think if you used an appliance it wouldn't matter so much what mail server you were using.  We had a Barracuda spam/antivirus appliance that worked great, I did not use the outbound mail filter policies but it looked like it was meant for what you are looking for.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 18, 2012, 06:45:58 AM
Nemx is the product we were using. :awesome_for_real:

A few of those are possibilities.  My google-fu did not use the term "data leak prevention" as my Corporate Speak skill is still very low.  Thanks, more to research.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 18, 2012, 01:36:09 PM
If you're going to do it onsite, DO use an appliance or something that doesn't run on the Exchange server itself. The gateway scanners that run directly on the Exchange server are asking for trouble IMO.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 18, 2012, 04:08:00 PM
If you're going to do it onsite, DO use an appliance or something that doesn't run on the Exchange server itself. The gateway scanners that run directly on the Exchange server are asking for trouble IMO.

Isn't the definition of an appliance vs software or a service is the fact that it has it's own dedicated hardware to run on?  Then again I suppose the marketing folks can fuck up the definition of just about anything these days.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on January 18, 2012, 05:19:19 PM
I was just reinforcing the recommendation to use an appliance.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 19, 2012, 09:15:45 PM
My definition of an appliance is anything that isn't customer-supportable.  But people like to imagine little black boxes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ShenMolo on January 20, 2012, 02:04:39 PM
I have a question regarding my Motorola Droid phone and Verizon.

I am at the end of my 2 year contract, and am considering cancelling my phone & data plan that's running me $117/month.

I have a work Blackberry that I can use for phone and text and some internet.

If I cancel my service with Verizon, will I be able to:

1. Continue using the Droid as a pocket computer (like an Ipod touch)?
2. Continue connecting via Wi-Fi?
3. Download music, apps etc via Wi-Fi?
4. Make calls via VoIP?
5. Continue using the GPS functionality?

I can potentially get a mobile Hot Spot for my company laptop through work. if so, and all the above are true, I don't see much need in paying Verizon anymore, except for keeping my old phone #.

Thanks


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on January 24, 2012, 12:39:38 PM
I want to say some gps apps will no longer work as they require cel tower connections.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on January 24, 2012, 01:50:24 PM
I want to say some gps apps will no longer work as they require cel tower connections.

I don't know exactly what the algorithm is but there has to be some data transfer even without a contract.  Even if just to handshake and decide that your out of the network.  I would imagine that data still has tower location/id and time in it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 24, 2012, 04:53:42 PM
You can still use it for emergency calls, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 25, 2012, 06:42:44 AM
I managed to lose my old Droid in record time but if I find it I will turn it on and see what it does.  The problem, however, is that I moved most everything to the SD card which now lives in my Razr.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 28, 2012, 06:59:20 PM
Trippy, halp.

BenQ EW2420 (http://ncix.com/products/?sku=55964&vpn=EW2420&manufacture=BenQ) $200 seems like an awfully good deal, and reviews seem to be mostly positive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 28, 2012, 07:28:11 PM
Seems okay but not great. You'll want a colorimeter to adjust the poor factory default color settings. Relatively high input lag may be a concern if you are playing twitchy games on it.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/content/benq_ew2420.htm
http://wecravegamestoo.com/forums/gadgetry-electronics-discussion/5382-benq-ew2420-mva-3-000-1-ansi-contrast-led-monitor-review.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 28, 2012, 08:31:24 PM
My current monitor is not much better in any of those respects, ancient TN FTL.  But I might have to pass unless there's a cheap way to calibrate.

Why the hell does every reasonably priced IPS have to use 18-bit colour?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 30, 2012, 01:28:15 AM
You can always calibrate using QuickGamma (http://quickgamma.de/indexen.html) or windows 7 calibration - control panel -> color management -> advanced. Both options aren't bad, almost certainly good enough for general usage. If you're doing photo work though then you probably want to look into hardware calibration for sure.

Changing the subject, we've got a bunch of devices in the house now that need charging via a micro-USB connection: 2 phones (different manufacturers), a kindle, a couple of wireless mice. When we want to charge from a power socket rather than a USB port on a PC do we need to be concerned about using the right adaptor for the right device or can we just use one that they all plug into? It's getting really tedious having multiple chargers all over the place.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 30, 2012, 08:35:01 AM
I'm not doing artwork.  Would just like a nice monitor.  There's a few other options I've spotted that look nice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on January 31, 2012, 01:48:25 PM
Changing the subject, we've got a bunch of devices in the house now that need charging via a micro-USB connection: 2 phones (different manufacturers), a kindle, a couple of wireless mice. When we want to charge from a power socket rather than a USB port on a PC do we need to be concerned about using the right adaptor for the right device or can we just use one that they all plug into? It's getting really tedious having multiple chargers all over the place.

I mix and match those things all the time and have never had an issue.  They're all putting out 5v.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 31, 2012, 02:05:37 PM
Just need to make sure it will put out enough juice to charge whatever device you are charging. Some devices require more current than others to charge properly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 01, 2012, 12:04:26 AM
Cheers. I did have a look at the ratings on the ones that had a visible one and they all said 5v just with some small variances in the mA (from 850 to 1000).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 01, 2012, 05:29:11 PM
I'm a nub with wifi networking.

So I'm configuring two laptops and a Linksys wireless router I'm shipping down to Florida for my folks. I want to be able to remote desktop in to both computers in case something goes wrong. In the dim distant past, they had one computer connected to the cable modem and I could WinVNC right in at whim. But that was easy to figure out. For some reason, I need new instructions in crayon.

1. Once they have everything plugged in and the router connected to the cable modem, they'll have whatever IP address their ISP gives them. What is the absolute easiest way my Mom could get that info to me? I could have her just do an ipconfig /all, but it'd be awesome if there was just some desktop gadget or taskbar thing that I could put on both computers that would show both the cable modem IP address and whatever IP the wifi router assigned to them. Then if they call with something broken, they can just read me both numbers. Which leads to the next question:

2. When I want to remote desktop into their computer, I assume the settings in RD Connection are something like:

- Computer <their cable modem IP>/<their computer IP>/<their computer name>
- User name: <their username>

Is that the case? The default example in RD Connection has a web domain and sub domain. I assume I don't need to register a domain for this, but if I do, I'm happy to. Florida is freakin' far.

3. In order to remote desktop into their computer, do I also need to enable remote router access on the router? Or is that only if i want to change a setting on their router (which I might if I want to turn off SSID, update firmware, or turn on MAC filtering once they've confirmed everything including their wifi printer is up and running).

Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on February 01, 2012, 05:32:59 PM
I would suggest just using some remote access provider like Logmein or something similar. Being able to tell parents 'just go to this website and click this' is a lot less painful than having them mess with all those other variables.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 01, 2012, 05:51:52 PM
Ah good idea. Lemme take a look at that.

Edit: Wow that was embarassingly easier. Took me longer to write the damned post above. Thanks again Ing!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 01, 2012, 06:18:41 PM
To RDP into their machines through a router you would need to set up port forwarding to each machine (which assumes that you know which IP they will get always).

As Ingmar said, LogMeIn or something similar is the best bet.

Also, if you need to find the outside IP of any computer, www.ipchicken.com is your friend.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 02, 2012, 06:53:41 AM
Or type "my ip" into google.

Thanks on the logmein thing, my dad moved to FLA last year. I'll be needing that, he's already borked his computer in 3 months.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on February 03, 2012, 10:31:10 PM
Anyone had experience with recent SSD's?  There are a couple of SATA 3 models on Newegg for about $100, 60-64GB, and since I am *completely* rebuilding my system (thanks to a video card upgrade gone horribly wrong), I thought I might want to get one of those (since I'm having to make a fresh OS install).

Anyway, assuming a 500MB/sec read speed, will Windows 7 64bit run enough faster to be worth it?  Or should I reserve the SSD for games (since Win7 will take most of the capacity if it's on there) and install Windows to my 1.5TB WD Green?  Everything indicates that Win7 will take up 40-45GB, which won't leave room for more than one or two games (and not even that, if they keep growing).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 03, 2012, 10:40:25 PM
My install of Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit on my file/media server is taking up 16.1 GB currently. I'm actually using an SSD as the boot drive on that system but I got that for reliability reasons (the boot drive used to be a consumer-level hard drive but it died) and not performance reasons.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on February 03, 2012, 11:48:20 PM
Anyone had experience with recent SSD's?  There are a couple of SATA 3 models on Newegg for about $100, 60-64GB, and since I am *completely* rebuilding my system (thanks to a video card upgrade gone horribly wrong), I thought I might want to get one of those (since I'm having to make a fresh OS install).

Anyway, assuming a 500MB/sec read speed, will Windows 7 64bit run enough faster to be worth it?  Or should I reserve the SSD for games (since Win7 will take most of the capacity if it's on there) and install Windows to my 1.5TB WD Green?  Everything indicates that Win7 will take up 40-45GB, which won't leave room for more than one or two games (and not even that, if they keep growing).

--Dave

I put in a 180 gig in my computer. Windows boots so nice and fast. Should have room for a game on the windows drive. Move the pagefile to another drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on February 04, 2012, 01:49:11 PM
If I have 12 gigs of 1600 speed ram, do I even need a pagefile?

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on February 04, 2012, 04:53:15 PM
Yes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on February 04, 2012, 06:21:34 PM
If I have 12 gigs of 1600 speed ram, do I even need a pagefile?

--Dave

Only if you never run programs totaling more than 12 GB HDD space.  So, uh, no Windows 7.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on February 04, 2012, 06:40:46 PM
If I have 12 gigs of 1600 speed ram, do I even need a pagefile?

--Dave

Only if you never run programs totaling more than 12 GB HDD space.  So, uh, no Windows 7.
Okay, I know that isn't true.  The only function of a pagefile is to hold data that won't fit in physical memory, but that doesn't need you need an amount equal to the disk size of the program you're running.  I know I could limit it to no more than 4GB, I'm just wondering if I can get away without having one at all (since few programs are going to have a big enough footprint to overwhelm 12GB of ram until 32-bit OS's completely go away).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 04, 2012, 06:42:10 PM
Modern operating systems use the pagefile all the time. It is not just for "what doesn't fit in physical RAM" anymore.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 04, 2012, 08:06:38 PM
What Murgos said is still false, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on February 05, 2012, 09:06:42 AM
What Murgos said is still false, though.


Fine, turn off your pagefile and sit and spin as you churn your drive everytime you switch context.

e:  Specifically a pagefile extends the addressable area of your RAM so that during a memory fetch when the data is not in cache you get to just grab the wanted page off the HDD because the CPU can directly address the data wanted via it's virtual address.  Without that you have to load blocks by contiguous physical memory, so if you can't fit the entire physical address space of all the programs you are running simultaneously into RAM you much more frequently load portions of data/instructions because they may not be stored in physically contiguous blocks.

So, then you lose most advantages of temporal locality in programming.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 05, 2012, 09:24:18 AM
Trippy is not saying to turn off the pagefile. He is just saying that your assertion about filesize is wrong.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mosesandstick on February 10, 2012, 09:48:37 AM
I have a feeling I've asked this before, I hope I haven't. Are there any advantages to having a headset over headphones + seperate mic? Surround sound?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 10, 2012, 10:23:15 AM
I have a feeling I've asked this before, I hope I haven't. Are there any advantages to having a headset over headphones + seperate mic? Surround sound?

The only ones I can think of are that it's only 1 thing to plug in, and the mic stays near your mouth easily. Everyone I know who has a separate mic is a nightmare on voice comms because of all the background noise you pick up because their mic is never, ever near enough to their mouth.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 10, 2012, 07:50:29 PM
Also, with a headset, you can pipe your game sound to the desktop speakers and just have voice comm in your ears. You can do this with headphones and a mic, but the mic will more likely pickup the noise from your desktop speakers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on February 14, 2012, 10:25:55 PM
I just upgraded from Firefox 3.6 (or something, something old) to the latest version (10?) and I've noticed that the fonts on certain websites are...subtly different. Bold things in particular look, well, odd. They still look bold, but they don't look the way they looked 10 minutes ago and it bothers me. Anyone have any idea what changed and how I can change it back? 4chan is the most strikingly different looking, but my Yahoo mail looks funky also.

Edit: Nevermind, finally found it via google.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 18, 2012, 10:40:20 AM
Using autohotkey, can you create an onscreen message via overlay, and not a pop up box?  Or is there another solution?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on February 23, 2012, 02:42:51 AM
Ok.... Google has failed me on this one...

I'm looking for a distributed macro program to have a couple people click the start fight button at the same time in World of Tanks.
"Three....Two....One....Click" fails a bit too often.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 06, 2012, 03:28:38 AM
Furi, can't you form a platoon and join a fight together?

My question: wanting to upgrade an old laptop to make it a bit more usable. It's about 8 years old, running XP, and only has 512Mb RAM. It's got 2 x 256Mb sticks in it, do we need to replace those with 2 sticks or can we just put a single 1Gb stick in and leave one slot empty?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 06, 2012, 06:50:19 AM
Depends on what you mean by usable. That's relatively ancient, and laptops don't age well.

My first stop would be the crucial.com configurator, see what the max for your system is. You can probably just put one stick in it, but it's probably dual channel memory so you'd get better performance out of two matched sticks...and you'd need every ounce of performance out of that dinosaur.

My advice: put the money you'd spend on RAM in a jar and save for a new laptop. The worst modern laptop is probably better than an 8 year old one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 06, 2012, 12:19:14 PM
Cheers Sky, will have a look at the configurator.

Would much rather get a new one, even a crappy one, but we just don't have the money for that right now, and if we can make it less painful to use for £20 then that'd do us.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on March 06, 2012, 12:28:02 PM
Furi, can't you form a platoon and join a fight together?

Can but if you want to get like 6-8 people in the same match you need both platoons to hit yes at the same time to get into the que together.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 07, 2012, 05:28:26 AM
Cheers Sky, will have a look at the configurator.

Would much rather get a new one, even a crappy one, but we just don't have the money for that right now, and if we can make it less painful to use for £20 then that'd do us.

If the laptop is so old that it only has 512mb RAM in it...I cannot imagine you will get any noticeable difference in anything worthwhile.  What are you trying to do with it?  Seems to me that a better way to make it less painful would be to use that 20 quid for some hash or something.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 07, 2012, 05:52:17 AM
Lol  :awesome_for_real:

Situation is that we're having to relocate because my GFs job is moving to the other side of the UK, so we're putting the house on the market, so we're making the bedrooms actually look like bedrooms again. To that end we've taken the desk which had my GFs PC on it out of the room it was in, and put her (aging) PC in a box in the loft. So she just wants a way to surf the net, run Office and log onto her work PC via Citrix sometimes. This crappy old laptop is all we have that she can do that on.

Given that she is on a mediocre salary and I am effectively unemployed we're having to spend every last penny on getting the urgent things done on the house that need doing. So we *really* can't afford a replacement laptop atm without having to borrow some money, which we'd rather not do.

At the moment browsing is painfully slow. I've stripped down the XP install as much as I can, disabled a lot of superfluous services, killed as many applications as I can, and it's still awful. I'm even wondering if putting Ubuntu on it would be an improvement, although I think <1Gb RAM will make even that a bit chuggy :/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Minvaren on March 07, 2012, 06:04:41 AM
Without knowing more about your specific model, the HD is generally the biggest bottleneck on laptops.  Anything you can do to prevent the PC from going to it (more ram, uninstall cruft), or allow it to access it faster (defrag, then 7200rpm model or SSD) will probably be your biggest bang for the buck.

Also, if it's an older Centrino, updating the wireless drivers can help a bit with the surfing speed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 07, 2012, 07:02:20 AM
If the laptop is so old that it only has 512mb RAM in it...

I can't imagine finding memory for that for $20, once RAM falls out of production the hoarders tend to gobble up the remaining supply and jack up the prices.  I wouldn't be surprised at all if it was well above $100 to push it to 2gb at this point the used PC market starts looking attractive and you aren't even that far off from a new netbook or a low end tablet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 07, 2012, 09:04:28 AM
It's running a Celeron 1.5GHz processor, 512Mb RAM, 40Gb 4200RPM HDD.

I couldn't get the wireless to work at all so in the end I just disabled the card in the BIOS and wired it up, so network speed isn't an issue.

I've already found RAM for it on Amazon for £20 for 1Gb sticks, double checked it's the right stuff too, 200-pin DDR PC2700 CL2.5.

Gateway no longer have *any* details at all for this laptop on their site, and no tool I can find for checking what RAM etc it can take. We've been looking at a range of options for new laptops and tablets and none of them seem to be what we need. Netbooks all seem to have tiny screens and are £100 and up. Tablets are just stupidly overpriced unless you get a really shit one... and we don't want to swap one kind of shit for another kind of shit. And new laptops that'd be worth the upgrade are in the £400+ bracket, which we just can't afford.

So I think we're just gonna leave it for now. Majority opinion here seems to be that going from 512Mb to 1Gb won't make that much difference, and there's no sense spending even £20 if we can help it right now! Thanks for the opinions everyone, maybe we'll be able to replace it if I manage to earn some money (ANY fucking money) this year. I hate recessions! :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 07, 2012, 09:34:35 AM
Gateway no longer have *any* details at all for this laptop on their site, and no tool I can find for checking what RAM etc it can take.
Crucial.com didn't come through? I could look up memory for the Dell laptop I had in 2000.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 07, 2012, 09:50:12 AM
Yep, it did, thanks for that suggestion Sky. I had to download their scanner tool but that was what enabled me to confirm that I had found the right stuff on Amazon.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 10, 2012, 12:40:18 PM
Seems okay but not great. You'll want a colorimeter to adjust the poor factory default color settings. Relatively high input lag may be a concern if you are playing twitchy games on it.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/content/benq_ew2420.htm
http://wecravegamestoo.com/forums/gadgetry-electronics-discussion/5382-benq-ew2420-mva-3-000-1-ansi-contrast-led-monitor-review.html

Update in case anyone else is looking for a cheap monitor: bought this when it was offered at $190 + free shipping.  No complaints at that price: it's huge and cheap and doesn't get crawling pixels or flicker from FRC/dithering.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 11, 2012, 07:28:49 PM
As much as I wanted to get us down to one TV in the house, we're all fighting over it.  How would this be for a 95% console gaming TV?  It appears to have Component Composite for the Wii and one HDMI for the PS3, I can't imagine I'd need much else.

Samsung P2770HD-27inch (http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-P2770HD-27-Inch-1920x1080-Monitor/dp/B0032ANC00/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1330832466&sr=8-1)

Any better in that price/size range?  I'm limited by size a bit, but could maybe do a 32".  Don't want to go much over $300 if I can help it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 11, 2012, 08:43:46 PM
As much as I wanted to get us down to one TV in the house, we're all fighting over it.  How would this be for a 95% console gaming TV?  It appears to have Component Composite for the Wii and one HDMI for the PS3, I can't imagine I'd need much else.

Samsung P2770HD-27inch (http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-P2770HD-27-Inch-1920x1080-Monitor/dp/B0032ANC00/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1330832466&sr=8-1)

Any better in that price/size range?  I'm limited by size a bit, but could maybe do a 32".  Don't want to go much over $300 if I can help it.
Is this a desktop monitor or are you going to be using it sitting on a couch?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 11, 2012, 09:30:45 PM
Mostly for a desktop.  Close, straight ahead viewing and I won't hook a PC to it.  I've read that it does PC text somewhat poorly. 

Really, it's just so I can use my consoles while the wife watches TV. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 12, 2012, 06:29:31 AM
Really, it's just so I can use my consoles the wife can watch tv while the wife watches TV I'm using my consoles.  


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 13, 2012, 12:43:26 AM
Mostly for a desktop.  Close, straight ahead viewing and I won't hook a PC to it.  I've read that it does PC text somewhat poorly. 

Really, it's just so I can use my consoles while the wife watches TV. 
I would prefer something with more HDMI inputs but I'm not sure there's anything in that size range with more than one of those.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 13, 2012, 07:49:31 AM
Maybe if you had an hdmi switching receiver, one hdmi wouldn't be so bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 13, 2012, 08:11:44 AM
No TV tuner and might be slightly risky, but this is a pretty tempting 27":
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l2736&_nkw=catleap

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1675393

Stand is supposed to be shitty and there really is kind of no way to return it if there are issues, but $370 for a 27" IPS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 14, 2012, 02:27:54 AM
No TV tuner and might be slightly risky, but this is a pretty tempting 27":
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l2736&_nkw=catleap

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1675393

Stand is supposed to be shitty and there really is kind of no way to return it if there are issues, but $370 for a 27" IPS.

See, I was sitting here all nice and comfortable, thinking to myself that I didn't need any more consumer electronics.  FUCK YOU for proving me wrong.

Damn I want that.  Damn.

I should know this, but dual link DVI?  What's that for?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 14, 2012, 02:51:56 AM
Regular DVI only supports up to 1920 x 1200. Higher resolutions like 2560 x 1600 (e.g. 30" 16:10 monitors) or 2560 x 1440 (27" 16:9 monitors) require a dual-link DVI interface.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 14, 2012, 03:00:40 AM
Ah, roger.  So you connect both of your dvi slots to it to get the extra resolution goodness.  I didn't know DVI had that limitation.  I am starting to get very curious as to what an extra 350 lines of resolution gets you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 14, 2012, 01:09:56 PM
No, it's one plug, there's just more pins.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 15, 2012, 07:00:23 AM
There was a similar limitation to the early HDMI stuff, without the ability to use dual-link.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 23, 2014, 11:13:25 AM
Anyone knowledgable about SSDs?

I've just got a Crucial M4 64Gb one and installed Win7 on it. Someone then linked me an optimisation guide (here (http://thessdreview.com/ssd-guides/optimization-guides/the-ssd-optimization-guide-2/)) that says to enable AHCI mode.

So I rebooted, checked the BIOS and the SATA is set to IDE. If I set it to AHCI then the system won't boot, as suspected. Does this mean I need to reinstall win7?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 23, 2014, 11:16:01 AM
Anyone knowledgable about SSDs?

I've just got a Crucial M4 64Gb one and installed Win7 on it. Someone then linked me an optimisation guide (here (http://thessdreview.com/ssd-guides/optimization-guides/the-ssd-optimization-guide-2/)) that says to enable AHCI mode.

So I rebooted, checked the BIOS and the SATA is set to IDE. If I set it to AHCI then the system won't boot, as suspected. Does this mean I need to reinstall win7?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922976


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 23, 2014, 11:25:44 AM
You are a god among men. Thankyou  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 06, 2012, 06:58:30 PM
Not sure how much of a tech question this is, but...

Just received my el-cheapo HT system (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00627UOK6 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00627UOK6)). I mostly bought it so that I could actually hear the TV over our loud AC units. However, I did not notice a way to pipe the 360 through it, so I'm guessing I need a receiver to pump all inputs through, correct?

If so, any suggestions for an OK entry-level receiver?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 06, 2012, 07:12:15 PM
It looks like that system has an optical audio input. If you so you could connect the Xbox 360 to that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: 01101010 on April 06, 2012, 07:13:56 PM
It looks like that system has an optical audio input. If you so you could connect the Xbox 360 to that.


Damn you Trippy... beat me to it by seconds.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on April 06, 2012, 07:56:07 PM
Maybe my 360 is too old, but it doesn't appear to have optical-out.

Fake-edit: Ah, seems I need to pick up a "HDMI Audio Adapter."  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on April 19, 2012, 11:08:07 AM
I need a wifi adaptor for my PC, there are tons on amazon but most seem to have pretty conflicting reviews. Does anyone have any suggestions or advice for a good (preferably USB) adaptor for a Win7 PC?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 19, 2012, 11:50:56 AM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833704045

Thing is awesome imo. I pull around 1.2MB down through it. My old pc with onboard wifi pulled 750k down.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 20, 2012, 08:08:07 PM
Does anyone have a lead on a mini receiver that can take 5.1 in and handle 3-5 speakers? Just looking for something to power some small L/C/R speakers and no other bells or whistles.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 21, 2012, 06:38:02 AM
Does anyone have a lead on a mini receiver that can take 5.1 in and handle 3-5 speakers? Just looking for something to power some small L/C/R speakers and no other bells or whistles.

I think there are some links somewhere up-thread from like a year ago when someone asked about a similar thing. I know I did some digging at some point (have to run to work so can't search now).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 21, 2012, 07:32:25 PM
Too bad you can't search a single thread. If you remember any keywords, let me know! Otherwise, I'll skim some pages of this monster ..


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on April 22, 2012, 02:50:19 AM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833704045

Thing is awesome imo. I pull around 1.2MB down through it. My old pc with onboard wifi pulled 750k down.

Cheers! I have ordered one of these.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 23, 2012, 05:30:49 PM
Very strange problem (for me anyway):

At least four nights a week between 6 and 8pm ET, there's a good chance Google.com will 404. At first I thought it was crashing. But after awhile I realized it was just me (at least within my circle). Trying to go to http://www.google.com in any browser just 404s. Meanwhile:

- I can tracert to google.com, so I don't think it's a DNS thing.
- I can go directly to the IP address (74.125.224.197 which I assume is some east coast base)
- I can use Google Mail, Docs, Blogspot and all other Google services I care about. I assume though this is because they're all located on different servers or VMs.

If I restart my computer, it's usually fine.

Any ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 23, 2012, 05:37:48 PM
It's proibably a DNS thing or you've been hacked :awesome_for_real:

google.com maps to many IP addresses so even if you try a single IP address that doesn't mean that's the IP address your browser was using. If you try a different browser that hasn't visited google.com in a while does it also give you a 404?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 23, 2012, 05:58:29 PM
Aaanndd, like clockwork, it's back. Next time it happens I'll try the different browsers thing again. Tonight I just did Chrome and IE9 (both cleared of everything).

If it's a hack, it's a very strange one :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 23, 2012, 06:01:19 PM
It's common for malware to muck with the hosts file and/or DNS settings.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 24, 2012, 04:27:55 AM
Given the time frame, I would lean towards DNS issues.  Whomever you use is probably getting overloaded.  Do you have a second computer you can try from, or a laptop you can borrow for an evening?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 24, 2012, 05:25:41 AM
Put in manual DNS servers and put 8.8.8.8 (google DNS) as your first one. Then put in the ones your ISP gives you (write them down first).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 06, 2012, 08:56:32 PM
Shouldn't Google use 7.7.7.7?

I have a small problem that is irritating me.  I have some mp3 that my car doesn't recognize, and some mp3 that it does.  Not know much about audio, I am initially assuming it is an encoding issue.  Is there a simple way to determine the encoding of a mp3, and also to re-encode an mp3?  I'm sure there are tools for this but I don't have the time or energy to break open something fancy or complex.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on June 06, 2012, 08:59:59 PM
Maybe some of those are too high of a bit-rate for your car's player? Could try converting them to a lower quality (smaller size) and see if that fixes it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 06, 2012, 09:05:26 PM
Are they VBR? I know some players don't support VBR.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 06, 2012, 09:39:06 PM
I don't have the ability to answer these questions at this time.  I'll have to search for "mp3 converter for idiots".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 07, 2012, 06:49:51 AM
I know my truck doesn't like it when I put a full disc mp3 playlist together. As long as I stick to burning audio CDs, it's great. I would also put my guesses along the lines of VBR or high bitrate (I use 192kbs VBR for compressed stuff).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on June 17, 2012, 09:23:43 AM
I am looking for some easy, safe password managing software, I finally decided to take internet security a bit more seriously. Any recommendations ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on June 17, 2012, 09:11:38 PM
Pencil paper safe.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on June 17, 2012, 10:45:11 PM
I tried Keepass, but found it simply too much to keep track of.  Yeah, I know that sounds dumb. 

I recently added two-step auth to Gmail, and that feels a bit safer overall.  Especially with Google docs being rolled into Drive soon-ish.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 18, 2012, 07:40:43 AM
I've been using Password Safe for several years now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 18, 2012, 09:06:17 AM
I tried Keepass, but found it simply too much to keep track of.  Yeah, I know that sounds dumb. 
I can't get over it sounding like keep ass. Since they spell it that way.

I, too, go for pencil paper safe method. I have a system for most of mine (avg 16-24 characters these days), so I can remember the majority.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Severian on June 23, 2012, 05:51:51 AM
Consider padding (https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm) your passwords.

Quote
Which of the following two passwords is stronger, more secure, and more difficult to crack?

D0g.....................

PrXyc.N(n4k77#L!eVdAfp9



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 23, 2012, 12:10:48 PM
Oh god it's Steve Gibson again :facepalm:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on June 24, 2012, 07:00:21 AM
I guess I've never gotten the entropy argument for passwords.  Sure single or even double words can be pretty easy to brute force but a short phrase of 16-24 letters with some some caps and some numbers and some special characters seems like it's just as hard as a string of all random alpha-numerics & special characters for a brute force attack to break.

There is just too many permutations even if you started with a simple phrase.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 24, 2012, 10:41:47 AM
It's dependent upon how the brute-force cracker is designed.  If it tries all of a subset of possibilities first (all lower, all caps, all symbols, all numbers), then having a password consisting of any single type means that particular program will stumble across it faster.

But cracking a password intelligently will look for ways to get around that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Murgos on June 25, 2012, 05:19:46 AM
I am specifically talking about the subset of people who say that A5^Jfdsj*99Nqqq! is harder to break than D!dgyr34ndGymb(3 because the second has information embedded in it (being that it's derived from a portion of the poem Jabberwocky) and the first is just me banging on the key board.  I don't think any intelligent hacking algorithm could crack either one any faster than brute forcing all n trillion permutations.

Except that the second is almost trivial to remember for a human and the first would be nearly impossible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 29, 2012, 10:25:29 AM
Surely there is a Steve Gibson meme.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on June 30, 2012, 11:47:22 PM
Need advice and confirmation: How do I conclusively tell if a GPU has melted?  I have a HIS IceQ Turbo Radeon HD 6950 that was not overclocked and was well ventilated.  It's maybe 9-10 months old.  Everything is black.  PC still passes the POST test fine, and from ear I think starts fully.  Nothing is displayed.  Cables fine.

Was playing Magic 2012 and nothing else.  Only other supporting evidence is 1) room was hotter than normal and 2) everything went black, and then fans kicked in faster than I've ever heard them before.  So, gone? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 01, 2012, 08:30:26 AM
Try the onboard video (cpu or mobo). You could try swapping in a known good gpu, but most don't have one around - if it's good, it's the gpu; if it's bad it's the slot. You could also try swapping the cable, or the monitor. Another thing I've seen a few times is the monitor being on the wrong input.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on July 02, 2012, 01:16:37 AM
You could also try smelling it.  Generally when electronics fry they forever have "that acrid smell".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 02, 2012, 05:32:26 PM
Weird.  Next day it displayed fine.  I assume it's the CPU then that had a heart attack?   Either way, I'll look at getting after stock coolers for the GPU and the i5.  Thanks for the advice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2012, 06:54:22 PM
Hyper 212 for the cpu and I apparently won't shut up about Arctic Cooling's gpu coolers   :grin:  And of course, get a tube of Arctic Silver, don't use whatever comes with.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on July 05, 2012, 08:29:14 AM
Weird.  Next day it displayed fine.  I assume it's the CPU then that had a heart attack?   Either way, I'll look at getting after stock coolers for the GPU and the i5.  Thanks for the advice.

I can't recommend an aftermarket CPU cooler enough, but I'd use HWMonitor (http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html) to see if your CPU/GPU are actually running hot before dropping serious coin on coolers - just leave it on in the background while you're gaming and check the max temps it records.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on July 09, 2012, 11:03:16 AM
My last (out of 4) computer with an IDE bus on it has finally given up the ghost.  Problem is I still have data that I was in the process of backing up to my computer that only has SATA support.  I'd rather not buy a junk computer just to get the data off of these 3 drives.  Is there a decent portable enclosure kit still available for IDE drives?  All I can find searching is units that have snazzy colors and bragging about how portable and awesome they are, oh yeah they're all SATA too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 09, 2012, 11:06:46 AM
I think for like $10 you can get a pata to sata converter.

edit: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812270269


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on July 10, 2012, 06:22:36 AM
I'm already thinking the answer is no, but can you get a PCI Wireless card to work with VMWare ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2012, 07:06:34 AM
I think for like $10 you can get a pata to sata converter.

edit: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812270269
I would think something like that. I have an ide to usb that has seen heavy usage over the years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 10, 2012, 08:48:43 AM
I'm already thinking the answer is no, but can you get a PCI Wireless card to work with VMWare ?
Only if there is a way to get it to see actual hardware.  Does VMWare have some kind of pass-through functionality?

Does it need to see it specifically though?  If the underlying OS can use the card, VMWare shouldn't care about the specifics of the network.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 10, 2012, 10:41:22 AM
Well, in most enterprise applications, wouldn't the underlying OS be the VMWare hypervisor?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on July 10, 2012, 04:04:30 PM
I have to imagine in this case we're talking about VMWare Workstation or Player running on a PC, the idea of an enterprise server running off a wireless card is kind of frightening. I've never set it up myself, but a little Googling reveals this:

http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=760

So it seems like it should be possible, given the right version of VMWare.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 12, 2012, 07:26:45 AM
Can I put this:
EVGA 02G-P4-2670-KR GeForce GTX 670 2GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130782)

On this:
Quote
MB ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP P35 775 RT (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131196) - Retail (Qty=1, Price=$149.99)

The question is really about this: PCI Express 3.0


EDIT: looks like yes, but possibly with some performance loss due to the transfer speed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on July 12, 2012, 08:23:40 AM
What exactly about pcie 3.0? Are you asking if it's back compatibile with pcie 1.1? It is, as long as the card and motherboard follow the pcie specifications, which in all likelyhood they do. PCIE is funny like that. You can take a modern videocard and with some grounding tricks and an xacto knife, get it to run in a pcie 1.0 1x slot.

The problem is, of course, that it'll downregulate to the speed of whatever port you have it plugged into. I'm assuming you want to buy a new gpu now and upgrade your cpu/motherboard shortly afterwards? Trying to run a modern gpu in such an old system may be possible, but I'd think it would be rather pointless as you'd probably end up siginificantly cpu-bound.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on July 12, 2012, 08:25:40 AM
The PCIe stuff is supposed to be backwards compatible but I haven't kept up with how that turned out.  A lot of complaints about where the sata ports are on that motherboard, sounds like two of them get blocked by long video cards.  Might need special sata cables if you use them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on July 12, 2012, 08:30:25 AM
If that's a problem he could use a pcie riser.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 12, 2012, 09:37:34 AM
Yes, asking about backwards compatibility. I don't really want to make a new machine right now, though I was quite sad my CPU was near the bottom of the list in a hardware survey I took recently.

This is my current setup: http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=18439.msg1079515#msg1079515


I had thought, I would be good for a few years with that motherboard, but it seems pins change really fast currently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 12, 2012, 01:26:52 PM
The second fan on my Twin Frozr isn't spinning anymore.  RMA time?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 13, 2012, 07:21:09 AM
ZOMG TIME TO BUY AN ARCTIC COO....ok, sorry. You could take it apart, check connections and reseat everything with new thermal goop; but I doubt MSI is as friendly to that kind of stuff as EVGA is.

But srsly the accelero is awesome, fans run lower, way less dbs and runs cooler than the twin frozr I have in sli with it


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on July 13, 2012, 10:02:18 AM
I might go that direction.  Luckily it seems to be handling itself OK in most games I play.  I worry that I'm going to play something with a little more graphical punch and it's going to start blue screening due to heat.

I took it out and looked at the two fans.  Cleaned everything out.  The second fan (most interior) is just stiff as hell. The first one spins fine, but the second one just resists any type of movement.  I'm a bit afraid to unseat the whole fan and heat pipe thingamabob.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on July 13, 2012, 12:46:31 PM
Just change your mental approach. Go in figuring, "it's already busted."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 18, 2012, 06:33:50 PM
Need advice and confirmation: How do I conclusively tell if a GPU has melted?  I have a HIS IceQ Turbo Radeon HD 6950 that was not overclocked and was well ventilated.  It's maybe 9-10 months old.  Everything is black.  PC still passes the POST test fine, and from ear I think starts fully.  Nothing is displayed.  Cables fine.

Was playing Magic 2012 and nothing else.  Only other supporting evidence is 1) room was hotter than normal and 2) everything went black, and then fans kicked in faster than I've ever heard them before.  So, gone? 

Check for a label with "ATI" on it.  Then you'll know. :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on July 18, 2012, 07:11:09 PM
Ha. My last ATI card died that way. I burned my finger pulling it out. Had an actual blister. That seemed a sign it was, in fact, dead.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on July 30, 2012, 07:19:36 PM
I...hate....Microsoft. HATE THEM.

Not only is getting my Vista reauthorized turning into a nightmare, but I've got some weird ass bug. I *think* it's some deep registry fuckup, some service not starting, or something....

But get this -- on a regular boot, double clicking an exe file? Doesn't run. Gives me a "C:\blah-blah\Desktop\blah.exe" (insert real values there) "A device attached to the system is not functioning" error and then does nothing.

I go to the event viewer and maybe, maybe, there's an error in profsvc (I think that's it) that's a brief "filepath not found" thing. Except I'm not sure that's actually the root cause. I don't know crap about the event system, so I don't even know what to look for.

Weird thing? Stuff installed works. Run whatever from the Start Menu? Just dandy. Just won't run a raw executable that's not installed. Have NO idea why. Google-fu fails me, mostly because 95% of that error message is in scan logs for viruses.

Anyone got a clue?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 30, 2012, 07:32:56 PM
Nuke that laptop from orbit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on July 30, 2012, 08:17:44 PM
Nuke that laptop from orbit.
It's getting there. Virus is gone. I think critical windows files just got eaten, corrupted, or didn't get repaired back. I'm trying a system restore to way back. If that doesn't work, it's time to save the data and reinstall.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on July 30, 2012, 08:42:37 PM
Nuking it from orbit feels like failure, but....I think failure it is.

Tomorrow I'll spend my evening finding her files and backing them up to a DVD or something. And then Format C: and on from there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on July 30, 2012, 09:21:38 PM
Ok, 2 hours after my pc has unceremoniously shit itself during beta I give up.  I've reset my bios and tried the restore disk but nothing works.  Shortly after post it will start windows to attempt to recover then it freezes.  The light on my mouse goes dark and the syste mists there, silently running nothing but the case fan.  Same if I try to boot from the restore disk or a USB.  Post to. ..nothing.  Any suggestions? I'm going to bed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 30, 2012, 09:26:51 PM
Is your CPU fan still working? Some possibilities:

* CPU is overheating and shutting the system down

* Power supply is dying

* Something is wrong with the voltage management on the motherboard (e.g. leaky capacitor)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on July 31, 2012, 03:56:30 AM
So far as I can tell the CPU fan is still working.  I didn't want to try and unseat it last night as it was nearly 12:30 and I had to get up in 5 hours. There was air movement but I couldn't tell if it was the case fan right next to it or the cpu fan.

Any way I can test the other two items tonight when I get home from work? At the office now so any further troubleshooting will have to wait.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2012, 07:14:56 AM
If you have another PC you can swap power supplies. MB is trickier to troubleshoot. Also make sure whatever you are plugged into is still good. I've had plenty of power strip sockets die over time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on July 31, 2012, 07:26:34 AM
I'm plenty sure the socket's ok but I'll give that a shot.  My other power supply is underpowered as it's from an old Dell and the new machine needs a 600w supply.  I've put in a support ticket w/ where I bought it as the machine is only 7 month old. I'd read they had power problems in their support when buying so perhaps that's what it is.

Think it could be anything else that I might want to troubleshoot or are these the only 3 likely causes?  Seems odd I didn't have any problems until running MWO.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2012, 07:38:18 AM
Could also be the video card having issues, though with that you normally see some visual indication or a BSoD.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on July 31, 2012, 07:55:36 AM
So far as I can tell the CPU fan is still working.  I didn't want to try and unseat it last night as it was nearly 12:30 and I had to get up in 5 hours. There was air movement but I couldn't tell if it was the case fan right next to it or the cpu fan.

Any way I can test the other two items tonight when I get home from work? At the office now so any further troubleshooting will have to wait.

Assuming the PC is the one you mentioned in this (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=21600.msg1019681#msg1019681) post, I'm going to hazard a guess that your PSU is probably fucked.  Those CyberPower OEM PSUs are complete shit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on July 31, 2012, 08:01:48 AM
That's the one and, yeah, I figured as much based on the research I'd done at the time, Noisy.

Trippy - Well, it could be that MWO fried the vid. drivers with its crashes.   I've got a spare card I'll try swapping-in or maybe the onboard video.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 31, 2012, 08:30:19 AM
More than likely MWO pushed the video card which increased the power draw, which shortened its capacity to provide stable power.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on July 31, 2012, 09:34:35 AM
That makes sense, I certainly hadn't been taxing it with World of Tanks and World of Warcraft or FA3.  I think the most taxing thing I'd played was Two Worlds 2 and Team Fortress.

Hm.. hopefully they'll get back to me.   I really don't feel like buying the only 800w supply on newegg.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on July 31, 2012, 10:02:29 AM
That makes sense, I certainly hadn't been taxing it with World of Tanks and World of Warcraft or FA3.  I think the most taxing thing I'd played was Two Worlds 2 and Team Fortress.

Hm.. hopefully they'll get back to me.   I really don't feel like buying the only 800w supply on newegg.

As long as you buy a quality power supply, you shouldn't need more than 600w for any single GPU system. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on July 31, 2012, 07:26:47 PM
Bought a power supply at mirocenter tonight.  Nope, that's not it.   :oh_i_see:  I'll return it this weekend.

So instead I pulled the HDD and I'm running check disk on it with the old box to see if there's bad sectors or files.  Sigh.

After this I'm gng to pull the old machine HDD and put it in the new box.  If it won't boot then it's something more severe and I'll force a service call on cyberpower.

Ed:
Update! Exchanged the power supply for a HDD today.  Same problem as before.  So I swapped the vid card with an old one..still the same freeze on 'loading windows.'. Arg.  In a fit do desperation I started swapping Sata cables around.  Yep that did it.  :oh_i_see:

So looks like I just had a bad plug on the board.  Though now the old HDD isn't recognized by and machine, so it may be bad too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 08, 2012, 08:29:58 PM
I...hate....Microsoft. HATE THEM.

Not sure why I got chuckles when I suggested Ubuntu.  It has a browser.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 21, 2012, 10:56:00 AM
bleh!  So I am getting a screen full of errors after post but prior to fully booting the OS, the main focal point for me of this screen full of error codes are the following 2 lines:

[Hardware Error]: Machine Check: Processor context corrupt
Kernal panic - not syncing: Fatal Machine check

After some googling I see hints that there might be a way to decode the "Machine Check: Processor context corrupt" messages but assistance of the CPU manufacturer (Intel) is required.  The google also told me to try disabling CPU features and see if that got me any further but disabling speed step, turbo boost, and vcx extensions got me such a minuscule amount further that I feel like it is just a random fluke.  

I am running ubuntu 64 bit sans gui, basically I can get to the grub menu every single time and I either then bomb out shortly after selecting a boot option or I make it to the next step which is to enter my password to decrypt my drive and as soon as I type the first character or 2 of that password I bomb out.  I did see a comment from 1 guy saying he switched to 32 bit and it worked I guess I will try that, I also have yet to run a memtest and that is certainly on the rather short todo list.

The spidey sense is telling me this is a fried CPU with bad RAM being a distant second.

Any other suggetions?

If it is a bad CPU and I have discarded the stock cooler and box will intel/newegg still offer any sort of replacement?

This entire system is only 8 months old, it has been powered on for nearly the entire 8 months but I have not checked on it for several months now.  

I can't recall the exact numbers but in the bios the temps all looked to be within reason (cpu at 50c is a bit high but certainly not at omfg levels).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 21, 2012, 11:35:51 AM
Corrupt disk which is causing the encryption to send a sequence which puts the kernal into a panic?

Do you have a spare HD around you could do a small test install on?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 21, 2012, 11:41:30 AM
bleh!  So I am getting a screen full of errors after post but prior to fully booting the OS, the main focal point for me of this screen full of error codes are the following 2 lines:

[Hardware Error]: Machine Check: Processor context corrupt
Kernal panic - not syncing: Fatal Machine check

After some googling I see hints that there might be a way to decode the "Machine Check: Processor context corrupt" messages but assistance of the CPU manufacturer (Intel) is required.  The google also told me to try disabling CPU features and see if that got me any further but disabling speed step, turbo boost, and vcx extensions got me such a minuscule amount further that I feel like it is just a random fluke.  

I am running ubuntu 64 bit sans gui, basically I can get to the grub menu every single time and I either then bomb out shortly after selecting a boot option or I make it to the next step which is to enter my password to decrypt my drive and as soon as I type the first character or 2 of that password I bomb out.  I did see a comment from 1 guy saying he switched to 32 bit and it worked I guess I will try that, I also have yet to run a memtest and that is certainly on the rather short todo list.

The spidey sense is telling me this is a fried CPU with bad RAM being a distant second.

Any other suggetions?

If it is a bad CPU and I have discarded the stock cooler and box will intel/newegg still offer any sort of replacement?

This entire system is only 8 months old, it has been powered on for nearly the entire 8 months but I have not checked on it for several months now.  

I can't recall the exact numbers but in the bios the temps all looked to be within reason (cpu at 50c is a bit high but certainly not at omfg levels).

Any chance you can get a spare HDD and bum a copy of Win7 and see if it'll install to that HDD and operate normally for a bit?  No need to register it or anything - just see if you get any weird hardware issues in (or installing) Windows.  It could be an OS-specific issue, since you're seemingly hunky-dory in the BIOS, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 21, 2012, 11:49:17 AM
Not the hard drive or OS, same message occurs when I was trying to install 64bit Mint off of a bootable usb.

edit - I do have a spare sata drive hanging around so I may give a w7 install a shot, I think I will try 32bit Mint first though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 21, 2012, 06:45:54 PM
What type of processor do you have?

I know that in the past, certain processors have had issues with various 64bit distros and kernel panics.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 21, 2012, 10:55:49 PM
Intel Core i3-2120 Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz LGA 1155 65W Dual-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 2000 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115077)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 21, 2012, 11:48:00 PM
Ran memtest86 for half an hour or so? Those errors sound like memory more than CPU, even if it talks about kernel panic (I get an image of a corn kernels running around screaming).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ragnoros on August 24, 2012, 10:40:22 PM
Sister did a budget upgrade to her PC. Went from Windows XP to 7 Pro. For some reason her games' textures seem to not be loading properly to varying degrees. Best I can describe it is they are all like the very low res placeholder textures you often see in a game for a few seconds while it loads the higher res textures, or applies meshes, or whatever the fuck video cards do these days.

My current thoughts are either driver issues, as her programs keep bitching about outdated drivers. But she has updated those and dxdiag shows they are current. Or the old PCIe 2.0 video card is not playing nice with new motherboard. FWIW she has tried both slots available to no avail. Not being on site makes it hard to do the normal poking around in bios I would usually do. Any thoughts on a good angle to pursue?

Specs.
(New) ASRock Z75 Pro3 Motherboard
(New) Intel Core i3-2120 3.3 GHz
(New) 8 Gigs Kingston DDR3 1333
(Old) EVGA GForce GTS 250
(Old) HDD & DVD Drive.
(Old) Antec 400W PSU


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 24, 2012, 10:48:23 PM
Is AHCI turned on in the BIOS? What kind of hard drives are in there? Did she do a clean install of the video drivers? If you do a Custom Install of the NVIDIA drivers it'll be one of the options in there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 25, 2012, 07:07:24 AM
Although my GPU works pretty well (GTS 250), I'm considering an upgrade.  Looking in the $150 range, must be Nvidia, and I like quiet.  This leads me to believe a GTX 560 is the likely choice.

Any suggestions on which should be at the top of my list?  Quiet trumps price, as long as it's not excessively more expensive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on August 25, 2012, 10:09:32 AM
The 560 Ti is reputedly pretty sweet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 25, 2012, 11:27:39 AM
Although my GPU works pretty well (GTS 250), I'm considering an upgrade.  Looking in the $150 range, must be Nvidia, and I like quiet.  This leads me to believe a GTX 560 is the likely choice.

Any suggestions on which should be at the top of my list?  Quiet trumps price, as long as it's not excessively more expensive.

I've bought two MSI Twin Frozr 560ti (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127594)s and have been happy with them, though as long as you get one with a twin-fan custom/non-reference cooler, you're likely to be okay with the purchase if noise is a priority.  They're currently a bit more than $150, but I'd skip lunch for a couple of days to get the ti versus the 'plain' 560.

All that said, The 660ti (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121653) is where it's really at, but that's another $150.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 25, 2012, 11:33:40 AM
Although my GPU works pretty well (GTS 250), I'm considering an upgrade.  Looking in the $150 range, must be Nvidia, and I like quiet.  This leads me to believe a GTX 560 is the likely choice.

Any suggestions on which should be at the top of my list?  Quiet trumps price, as long as it's not excessively more expensive.
Yes the GTX 560 is your best choice performance-wise barring some sort of special sale / rebate on the 560 Ti. For quiet something like the Gigabyte GV-N56GOC-1GI is pretty good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 25, 2012, 11:42:22 AM
Now that you mention it, I've got a 560ti (one of the MSI Twin Frozr units I mentioned earlier) that I'd be willing to pack and ship for $100+(likely ~$10) shipping costs, since that'd take the edge off replacing it with a 660ti in my LAN party box.

If you're interested, let me know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 25, 2012, 05:25:54 PM
That's a far better deal than I'd find in a store.  As long as it's not on its last legs, I'll take it.

You've got PMs blocked.  (I didn't even know that was possible.)  Otherwise I'd send you details in one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 25, 2012, 07:46:20 PM
That's a far better deal than I'd find in a store.  As long as it's not on its last legs, I'll take it.

You've got PMs blocked.  (I didn't even know that was possible.)  Otherwise I'd send you details in one.

I wasn't aware it was possible either.  :/

At any rate, I think Ive turned that off - if you're still interested, let me know and it's yours.  The card hasn't been overclocked or anything, so it should be fine.  I'm not aware of any issues with it beyond having to dust it off every now and then.  :P


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 27, 2012, 09:21:22 AM
Although my GPU works pretty well (GTS 250), I'm considering an upgrade.  Looking in the $150 range, must be Nvidia, and I like quiet.  This leads me to believe a GTX 560 is the likely choice.

Any suggestions on which should be at the top of my list?  Quiet trumps price, as long as it's not excessively more expensive.
Consider the awesome aftermarket coolers I always pimp here. Then when you can upgrade the gpu, you can transfer that forward.

The Twin Frozr is decent, but quite audible under load (from GW2, say). The Accelero is not.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 27, 2012, 10:54:24 AM
Consider the awesome aftermarket coolers I always pimp here. Then when you can upgrade the gpu, you can transfer that forward.

The Twin Frozr is decent, but quite audible under load (from GW2, say). The Accelero is not.

That would damn near double the cost of the card!  :P

That said, my TFII-cooled cards have been quiet, though I'm running them in cases with a LOT of airflow and not packed right up against each other in SLI.  Worst case scenario, just use Afterburner (http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm) to tune the fan noise/heat tradeoff to your liking.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 28, 2012, 06:38:56 AM
That would damn near double the cost of the card!  :P
Amortize it out across several builds!

She said quiet was important, and that cooling is the quietest you're going to get short of messy liquid tubing stuff. Without any sacrifice to performance, indeed it lets you push cards beyond what you can do with stock cooling without budging the temps, because it's also an amazing performer. My TF2 card gets hotter and is noisier. Sure, SLI is part of it, but the card that's getting the massive heat intake is the one with the Accelero and it's running cooler and quieter, at half the rpms of the TF2!

Ok, I'll let off for now. It's just such an amazing upgrade, I wouldn't be without it. I mean, look at everyone with the hyper212s. Same damn thing!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on August 28, 2012, 07:31:42 AM
It's not like I actually push my graphics cards very hard.  I'm still running 1650x1080.  When the new card comes in and it's loud enough I can hear it, then I'll consider an after-market cooler.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 29, 2012, 07:35:35 PM
Ran memtest86 for half an hour or so? Those errors sound like memory more than CPU, even if it talks about kernel panic (I get an image of a corn kernels running around screaming).

Even more, ran through 10 reps and it was clean.  I am fairly certain it is the cpu but a bad motherboard might be possible as well.  Still not sure if I can get the cpu swapped after tossing the factory heat sink, I am contemplating buying the same CPU and grabbing the heat sink off of that so I have something complete to exchange.  I would then have a spare cpu at least, the downside is I don't really want to shell out another $125 for a part that is only 8 months old and if I did I would rather throw in another $10 and get that new 35w core i3.   

Anyone know if the following 2 processors would have the exact same heat sink?

Intel Core i3-2120 Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz LGA 1155 65W Dual-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 2000 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115077)
Intel Core i3-2120T Sandy Bridge 2.6GHz LGA 1155 35W Dual-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 2000 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115094)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 30, 2012, 03:01:46 AM
Anyone know if the following 2 processors would have the exact same heat sink?

Intel Core i3-2120 Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz LGA 1155 65W Dual-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 2000 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115077)
Intel Core i3-2120T Sandy Bridge 2.6GHz LGA 1155 35W Dual-Core Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 2000 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115094)

Based on a little googling, there do seem to be some differences:

2120T - All-aluminum, spiral fin design, Delta fan - images taken from a 2012 forum post:

2120 - All aluminum, straight split-fin design, NIDEC fan - images taken from HardwareCanucks review in 2011:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 30, 2012, 03:17:19 AM
Not exactly a PC issue for once...

I've had one of these (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00627UOK6/ref=oh_details_o06_s03_i00 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00627UOK6/ref=oh_details_o06_s03_i00)) and it seems the disc drive died (it always kind of made odd noises anyway).

What would be the best thing to replace it with? The speakers are actually OK enough for me, so I'm definitely not looking to buy a whole new system - just need something that can do Blu-ray, run the speakers, and hopefully accept my 360's optical connection as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 30, 2012, 07:54:48 AM
You are probably going to end up having to buy a new system if you want something that will drive speakers and have a built in drive. They don't typically sell the head unit stand alone.

Since you only have one input on that unit you can't just buy a stand alone blu ray and plug it into the system.


Does your TV have an optical audio out? You could plug your 360 and a stand alone blu-ray into HDMI on the TV, then use the optical out to go from the TV to that unit to do audio only.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 30, 2012, 08:43:11 AM
The port on the back is called "Digital Out" but it would appear to be the same asymmetric shape that Optical uses. The original head unit appears to work, except for the drive. I tried opening it up today, but wasn't able to access the innards of the drive without breaking things (was hoping something would just be out of alignment or caught somehow).

I guess it's worth a shot anyway. Any particular players better than others at this point? I don't think I'll be using any of the BD Live or other online functions anytime soon.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 05, 2012, 08:58:03 AM
Any recommendations on starter capture tablets?  I'm sketching for the next two semesters of graphic design classes, and would like to supplement my physical sketchbook with a digital. 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823100093 - $67

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823100088 - $90


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 05, 2012, 12:00:39 PM
I've got an Intuos 4 M and I love it, although it took me a lot of getting used to. If you are already good at drawing you may find the learning curve less steep :)

I would say that I could probably have got away with a smaller one than the M, mostly because of the huge amount of desk space it takes up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on October 07, 2012, 09:50:06 AM
1) Not sure how many times in my life so far I've had to ask this, but here we go again:  what's a reliable (non malware!) good DVD Ripper?

2) Also, lubuntu:  good and reliable, or not?  I need a reliable, lightweight distro for an x86 laptop.  Options?


Thank ye.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 07, 2012, 11:29:15 AM
1) Not sure how many times in my life so far I've had to ask this, but here we go again:  what's a reliable (non malware!) good DVD Ripper?
DVD Decrypter (http://www.dvddecrypter.org.uk/)



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on October 09, 2012, 08:12:37 PM
Thank you Sir.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 11, 2012, 12:41:27 PM
So what's the latest whizzbang on laptops? I'll be back in the US in a week or two (probably) and will be picking up a laptop of some sort. I'm either going to go with a simple netbook, or more of an actual laptop.

If I go netbook, are there any that are generally better than the rest? How do they perform with gaming? I recognize I would have to keep it to simple stuff from Steam or GOG.

If I go laptop, I don't need to be able to play Crysis-level stuff, but maybe WoT or something of that caliber would be nice.

Suggestions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 11, 2012, 12:44:50 PM
Obligatory "what's your budget" reply.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 11, 2012, 02:42:50 PM
Um...under $1000? It's really going to depend on what I am seeing - I've never owned a laptop of any sort.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 11, 2012, 05:51:17 PM
Um...under $1000? It's really going to depend on what I am seeing - I've never owned a laptop of any sort.
You do not want a netbook. The CPUs on those things are incredibly gimpy (typically an Intel Atom or the AMD equivalent) even for doing basic things like Web surfing.

I would use this new model Dell Inspiron 14z Ultrabook as the basis for comparison:

http://www.dell.com/us/p/inspiron-14z-5423/pd?oc=fncwt23b&model_id=inspiron-14z-5423

$899
~ 4 lbs
i5 2.6 GHz GPU
14" screen (only 1366 x 768 though)
AMD 7570M dedicated GPU
Okay battery life


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 12, 2012, 10:27:56 AM
Hmmm...

Seems nice, but the problem is that (as per the link) it takes more than a week to ship the thing. I'm only back in the US for 3 weeks, and I'm not even going to be in the same place the whole time - in DC for a week, then on leave for 11 days in 2 locations, then back to DC.

Is it possible to buy something like that at a brick and mortar shop, or is it online only?

If I was going to get that, how good is the video card? I'm not familiar with mobile chipsets.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 12, 2012, 10:34:05 AM
The asus zen book is pretty cool if you want something light yet powerful, problem with ultrabooks is no cd/dvd drive and no discrete graphics.  If you want something with a larger form factor or discrete graphics I usually recommend getting a Dell Studio or XPS from their outlet, unfortunately the 25% off outlet laptops coupon I had expired on 10/2.

edit - just saw your post about travelling, 1 good thing about using the Dell Outlet is the stuff is available right now so it ships almost same day and you can have it in 3 or 4 days.  The downside is that there can be the occasional lemon in the mix so if you are shopping on the go then leaving the country you may have trouble returning your purchase.  I will say that in my experience Dell has a pretty hassle free refund process, if you don't feel like troubleshooting something that you just bought just return it and ask for a refund.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 12, 2012, 12:32:34 PM
Hmmm...

Seems nice, but the problem is that (as per the link) it takes more than a week to ship the thing. I'm only back in the US for 3 weeks, and I'm not even going to be in the same place the whole time - in DC for a week, then on leave for 11 days in 2 locations, then back to DC.

Is it possible to buy something like that at a brick and mortar shop, or is it online only?

If I was going to get that, how good is the video card? I'm not familiar with mobile chipsets.
The 7570M is okay at that price range. You can find relatively rankings of mobile GPUs here:

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html

Amazon has a variant of the configuration (http://www.amazon.com/Dell-Inspiron-i14z-8001sLV-14-Inch-Ultrabook/dp/B0081YPUS4/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1350068953&sr=8-4&keywords=inspiron+14z) I linked above available (it has a different CPU). So that may be an option, though it is $100 more expensive.

If you want to buy something at a B&M store print out the ranking of mobile GPUs and see what you can find at a Best Buy, Sony Style or some place like that.

Depending on your schedule and if you are willing to splurge a bit there's this upcoming VAIO S prebuilt model (http://store.sony.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=8198552921666493378#specifications) from Sony. I have a customized version of that model cause I wanted an IPS display as I was tired of all the color shifting on my other laptop's crappy TN panel display (at my normal viewing distance the colors at the top and bottom are off from the center no matter what angle I have the display at). The GPU is an NVIDIA 640M LE which is better than the AMD 7570M, though it's not as good as the regular 640M. However there's a readily available firmware patch that let's you boost the clock speeds substantially that people have reported very good success with. I have another laptop that has a better GPU (an NVIDIA 560M) that I game on so I haven't tried it myself yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 12, 2012, 12:53:37 PM
I wanted an IPS display as I was tired of all the color shifting on my other laptop's crappy TN panel display (at my normal viewing distance the colors at the top and bottom are off from the center no matter what angle I have the display at).

This has been driving me nuts the last couple months. I've been doing post-processing on pics of my mini paint jobs using my fiancee's laptop (a dell studio) and GIMP. Driving. Me. Nuts.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 12, 2012, 12:54:27 PM
Dell Outlet has a 15.6" XPS for $1400ish and their is a coupon code for 25% off, they are also running a 25% off alienware coupon code as well so you could get a screaming 14" laptop for under 1k but it would be on the heavy side.

It has been a few years but the 3 vaio's I've worked on were all a nightmare.

Base alienware 14x r2:
    Processor: Intel Core 3rd Generation i7-3610QM Processor (2.3GHz up to 3.3GHz,6MB Cache,w/ Turbo Boost 2.0)
    Genuine Windows 7 Home Premium
    Dell Outlet Alienware M14x R2 Laptop
    500 GB SATA Hard Drive (7200 RPM)
    6 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1600MHz (2 DIMMs)
    8X DVD +/- RW Drive
    2 GB DDR5 NVIDIA GeForceGT 650M using NVIDIA Optimus technology

XPS Studio 15 with nvidia 640:
    Processor: Intel Core 3rd Generation i7-3612QM Processor (6MB cache, up to 3.1 GHz)
    Genuine Windows 7 Home Premium
    XPS 15
    32GB SSDR mSATA Card
    750 GB SATA Hard Drive (7200RPM)
    8 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1600MHz (2 DIMMs)
    8X Blu-Ray BD Combo (Blu-ray ROM + DVD+/- RW)
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M with 2GB GDDR5 VRAM

some coupon codes:
http://slickdeals.net/f/5318032-DELL-Outlet-Coupons-3-Day-Sale-Upto-25-Off


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 12, 2012, 01:04:10 PM
Something like this might work for you at ~$800:

Acer TimelineU M5-481TG-6814: Newegg (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834215392), Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/Acer-TimelineU-M5-481TG-6814-14-Inch-Ultrabook/dp/B0085H65VS/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1350071823&sr=1-1&keywords=Acer+Aspire+TimelineU+M5-481TG-6814)

A bit heavier than the Inspiron 14Z and not as nice looking but it has a better GPU (640LE). Not sure on battery life.

Here's also the list of laptops from Newegg (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=Property&Subcategory=32&Description=&Type=&N=100006740&IsNodeId=1&IsPowerSearch=1&srchInDesc=&MinPrice=&MaxPrice=&PropertyCodeValue=2923%3A18470&PropertyCodeValue=445%3A14143&PropertyCodeValue=445%3A14140&PropertyCodeValue=445%3A14141&PropertyCodeValue=445%3A14142) under 5 lbs with a dedicated GPU. A lot of them don't have very good GPUs so you'll need to refer to the notebookcheck.net list to see which ones are decent at your price range.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on October 14, 2012, 06:36:17 AM
So it appears that I have a failing HDD. The good and bad news is that it is my games drive, so no irreplaceable software or anything but I really do not want to lose any of my games saves, especially for stuff like Skyrim. So I am wondering if anyone here can point me to some exceptionally cheap (or free!) hard disk recovery software. It is not really worth paying an exorbitant amount for the professionals to recover some game saves. I keep getting an I/O error and a hard drive failure warning but Hardware Manager says the device is working properly. I have pulled it from the case and have it sitting in an external dock.

WD 1TB SATA /64

Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 14, 2012, 09:37:03 AM
I would try booting into something like Parted Magic (http://partedmagic.com/doku.php?id=start) and using the various disk utilities therin to copy the data off. You can either use it to mount the filesystem and copy the files or (which I think would probably be best) use disk cloning to put the entire contents onto a new disk and then see what you can recover that way if the drive is failing.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Raging Turtle on October 18, 2012, 05:40:24 PM
I cracked the screen on my macbook air today - the computer still works perfectly well, but the cracks spread if I'm not careful when handling it.  Anyone know if there's a way to get this fixed without paying $400-450 (seems to be the going rate)?  I've heard I can order the part and repair it myself, but I'm pretty sure that'd void the warranty for anything else that might happen.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 18, 2012, 06:03:19 PM
Repair a screen on a MacBook Air yourself? :rofl:

*Ahem*

It seems like you would need to replace the entire display assembly. So the part by itself is probably pretty expensive and you won't save much money doing it yourself. However if you want to see what it takes to replace the entire display assembly ifixit.com has the answer:

http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Installing+MacBook+Air+13-Inch+Mid+2012+Display+Assembly/10951/1


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Raging Turtle on October 18, 2012, 08:36:53 PM
Figured it be something like that.  Thanks for the link.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 18, 2012, 09:44:21 PM
So it appears that I have a failing HDD.

Parted Magic has ddrescue, that and a new disk is all you need.

Repair a screen on a MacBook Air yourself? :rofl:

It's possible to just replace the panel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHNtnvzfSzY

Looks like the screen is about $100.  The same people quote $250-$370 to service it, depending on panel type.  That doesn't sound too bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 18, 2012, 10:36:46 PM
Uh, yeah, that video conveniently leaves out how to glue everything back together without fucking things up or making the new screen look like shit. I've taken apart my share of unibody MacBook Pros but there's no way I would attempt to unglue a panel and glue a new one back in. Replacing the entire assembly, though, definitely looks doable with enough patience and care.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on October 19, 2012, 01:03:45 AM
Eh, obviously it was done by someone at some point, but I take your meaning.

Also, this is why I don't do laptops.  I rage when I have to hook up front panel audio and LEDs to those retardedly tiny and tightly clustered pinouts on a standard ATX tower, I'd just utterly lose my shit servicing a laptop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 19, 2012, 06:37:56 AM
Working on laptops sucks.  I pretty much refuse.  If the issue is pressed (bosses :roll:), I do my best and pray to the computer gods, while telling the owners it's probably going to never be quite right again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 19, 2012, 07:50:30 AM
. I've taken apart my share of unibody MacBook Pros but there's no way I would attempt to unglue a panel and glue a new one back in. Replacing the entire assembly, though, definitely looks doable with enough patience and care.

Agreed, as usual. Way more expensive, but really the only way you'll get a good result.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 22, 2012, 07:09:52 PM
So I ended up getting the Dell...seems pretty nice so far, but haven't gotten a game pulled down on it yet. It's pretty sleek, though I wish there wasn't nearly as many odd bloatware programs installed...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 22, 2012, 07:16:08 PM
Make the recovery disks if the computer didn't already come with them and then go wild and uninstall as much crapware as you can.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 22, 2012, 08:01:22 PM
First thing to delete is whatever McAfee/TrendMicro bullshit is on there and install Microsoft Security Essentials.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 22, 2012, 08:34:25 PM
So I ended up getting the Dell...seems pretty nice so far, but haven't gotten a game pulled down on it yet. It's pretty sleek, though I wish there wasn't nearly as many odd bloatware programs installed...

That's how Dell/et all make their money on each laptop these days - what, you expect them to make a profit on just the hardware alone? Pffft.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 24, 2012, 07:09:08 PM
Make the recovery disks if the computer didn't already come with them and then go wild and uninstall as much crapware as you can.


How I do this?  :uhrr:

Also, I think it's odd that I have a SSD + HDD...but cannot see it in Explorer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 24, 2012, 08:40:52 PM
Make the recovery disks if the computer didn't already come with them and then go wild and uninstall as much crapware as you can.


How I do this?  :uhrr:

Also, I think it's odd that I have a SSD + HDD...but cannot see it in Explorer.
Check the docs or the Dell specific utilities that are installed. There's usually an app that you run to create the disks. It may be buried within a non-obvious app like a "System checkup" app or the like.

The SSD you have is being used as a caching drive through Intel's Smart Response technology which is why you don't see it. (It's a special mSATA "mini" SSD, not a regular 2.5" SSD). You can if you want disable Smart Response and make that drive available as a regular drive. You could even with a lot of work possibly use it for the OS drive but I wouldn't recommend it cause it would be a really tight fit with only 32 GB available (Windows 7 will take up at least 20 GB by itself).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 25, 2012, 08:58:15 AM
Does someone want to save me time and effort by recommending a method to aggressively rotate/truncate /var/log/messages on Redhat?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 25, 2012, 09:08:57 AM
Change what's in /etc/logrotate.conf or add a custom config to /etc/logrotate.d/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 25, 2012, 09:17:51 AM
Good start, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 25, 2012, 09:21:54 AM
Does someone want to save me time and effort by recommending a method to aggressively rotate/truncate /var/log/messages on Redhat?

store them on their own partition, ignore everything and let partition fill up = logs truncated!

or something like they do for the apache logs:
http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2011/07/rotate-apache-logs/

or if you want to throw something in cron that occasionally does a purge.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 25, 2012, 10:01:36 AM
A chron job that does "rm -f /var/log"?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 25, 2012, 06:53:16 PM
You guys are awesome.  For all the wrong reasons.

Mostly I just needed to get a starting point on how it works in Redhat: needlessly complex, it turns out, but that's linux for you.  There was some sort of rotation going on, since there was a messages.1 file, and since I identified the basic location of things I just changed the general syslog parameters to daily and rotate 90... since I was told we need to keep 90 days of information.  I also added compress, which will hopefully solve mask the problem.  Which is lots of connection messages from a syslog server.  Which I don't know anything about, either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on October 25, 2012, 08:15:25 PM
Make the recovery disks if the computer didn't already come with them and then go wild and uninstall as much crapware as you can.


How I do this?  :uhrr:

Also, I think it's odd that I have a SSD + HDD...but cannot see it in Explorer.
Check the docs or the Dell specific utilities that are installed. There's usually an app that you run to create the disks. It may be buried within a non-obvious app like a "System checkup" app or the like.

The SSD you have is being used as a caching drive through Intel's Smart Response technology which is why you don't see it. (It's a special mSATA "mini" SSD, not a regular 2.5" SSD). You can if you want disable Smart Response and make that drive available as a regular drive. You could even with a lot of work possibly use it for the OS drive but I wouldn't recommend it cause it would be a really tight fit with only 32 GB available (Windows 7 will take up at least 20 GB by itself).


Trippy - TO THE RESCUE!  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 26, 2012, 05:20:55 AM
Mostly I just needed to get a starting point on how it works in Redhat: needlessly complex, it turns out, but that's linux for you.  There was some sort of rotation going on, since there was a messages.1 file, and since I identified the basic location of things I just changed the general syslog parameters to daily and rotate 90... since I was told we need to keep 90 days of information.  I also added compress, which will hopefully solve mask the problem.  Which is lots of connection messages from a syslog server.  Which I don't know anything about, either.
Syslogs generate a TON of useless data.  One of our clients requires we collect every bit of data imaginable.  (For a company our size, that much is just useless.)  It generated several gigs of log data a month.  In a database.  And we have to keep 13 months of it at all times.

Thankfully I found a way to extract all that and compress the hell out of it, but it wasn't pleasant with the tools I'm given.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 29, 2012, 07:17:22 PM
The best part is that the messages log is filling with TCP/UDP connection lines to the syslog server.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on October 29, 2012, 09:04:33 PM
The weirdest thing is happening with my PC -- (Windows 7). The volume control on flash videos is...gone. It's just not there. No problems with sound anywhere else, but Youtube? 95% of the time on IE9 I'm just missing the volume control on the videos! (And obviously no sound).

Chrome's fine. But not IE9. And I can't figure out why.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 30, 2012, 04:46:18 AM
Uninstall Flash, then download the package again from within IE (so you definitely get the ActiveX version) and reinstall.

Or you don't actually HAVE Flash and Youtube is giving you the HTML5 versions and IE is borking it (Chrome has Flash built in).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 30, 2012, 06:36:04 AM
The best part is that the messages log is filling with TCP/UDP connection lines to the syslog server.
At least it's not writing a log for each time it writes a log.  That you've found. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 05, 2012, 08:00:16 PM
Can anyone recommend me a decent and free video compression thingo?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 05, 2012, 09:41:18 PM
What are you trying to compress to what?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 06, 2012, 03:06:14 AM
What are you trying to compress to what?

Fraps avi into anything that is small enough to actually handle/upload to youtube/dropbox.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 06, 2012, 05:37:17 AM
If you need to edit it as well, I have had pretty decent luck with windows live
Movie maker. It will allow you to mess with resolution/etc on save.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 06, 2012, 07:17:04 AM
What are you trying to compress to what?

Fraps avi into anything that is small enough to actually handle/upload to youtube/dropbox.

Once you verify your account properly youtube will let you upload some pretty insane sized videos. 

The documentation is horrid but if you are capable of programming simple scripts ffmpeg is the best.  For example if the movies you are converting are always of a certain file type/size/aspect ratio and you always want to convert that to a specific output, you just dork around with ffmpeg until you have the right command to do that.  Then you include that in a script that just watches a certain directory and any time you place a file in that "input" directory it will convert it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2012, 07:41:28 AM
What are you trying to compress to what?
Fraps avi into anything that is small enough to actually handle/upload to youtube/dropbox.
Fraps can be a bit tricky when it comes to free tools as Fraps uses a custom DirectShow codec and a lot of the free open source tools don't use DirectShow since it's Windows-specific and a lot of the tools come from the Linux world. That all being said libavcodec, which a lot of open source tools use (including ffmpeg that Salamok mentioned above) for their codecs (bypassing DirectShow on Windows), does support Fraps. My recommendation is to try Handbrake (http://handbrake.fr/), which also uses libavcodec.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 06, 2012, 02:45:38 PM
Many thanks to you all for the recommendations.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 14, 2012, 08:48:02 PM
Any recommendations on a low-priced TV or monitor for my broken PS3?  The BR drive went on my third gen, so I bought a new 5th gen for the living room.  However, that leaves the near-fully functional PS3 that can play any PSN games and Netflix.  So we're thinking of throwing a small TV/monitor at it for a spare room. 

Only needs are that it's cheap, +20" and has HDMI.  Much apprecaited!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 15, 2012, 08:01:32 AM
How cheap is cheap?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 15, 2012, 08:21:54 AM
$200 max, preferably more in the $100 range.  I don't know, I was really thinking just a small monitor to throw in my kid's room so she can watch Netflix and a few downloadable games from PSN.  It really doesn't have to be awesome, she's 7 years old.  But I may end up cannibalizing my PC on my next build, and I'd use it for a PC for her. 

Newegg had this unit, which was overbudget, but doable.  I was hoping for something more in the $100 range. 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236049


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 15, 2012, 08:28:51 AM
23" Dell for $135 on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Dell-ST2321L-23-Inch-Screen-Monitor/dp/B007Y0EQE0/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 15, 2012, 03:21:39 PM
Thanks!  That's right up my alley.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on November 22, 2012, 08:18:27 AM
Happy Thanksgiving!

Parents are wondering about netbooks for my aunt, but I saw Trippy's post from last month about netbooks. Aunt needs email and a fully functioning web experience for a variety of things that take tablets out of the equation.

Any recommendations on ultrabooks in the $500 range? And do any include dedicated 3G/4G/LTE connections or are those modems still separate?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on November 22, 2012, 09:49:44 AM
Doctor Trippy, can I get a consult. (http://ncix.com/products/?sku=66286&vpn=M12II%20750&manufacture=Seasonic%20Electronics&promoid=1209) (or anyone who keeps up to date on these things, really)  I can't find much if anything on the intarwebs about this particular model.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on November 22, 2012, 10:10:03 AM
Doctor Trippy, can I get a consult. (http://ncix.com/products/?sku=66286&vpn=M12II%20750&manufacture=Seasonic%20Electronics&promoid=1209)  I can't find much if anything on the intarwebs about this particular model.
When buying from ncix I usually just look up the same item on newegg because it will have more ratings and reviews.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151107&Tpk=M12II%20750


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on November 22, 2012, 10:41:17 AM
Not to be a dick when you obviously intend to help, but this is a pretty good example of why I generally look for expert opinions.

"Lots of cables, this is great."
"Too many cables."
"The cables are long enough to route behind the mobo."
"The cables are too short to route behind the mobo."
"Stealthy like ninja!"
"...dressed in half plate."
"Reliable."
"DOA."
"It raped my sister."
"That's not what she told her friends."

EDIT: I checked HardOCP and HardwareSecrets for both the M12II 750 and S12II 750, as well as doing the standard Google search.  There are reviews of lower wattage versions, but I'm pretty sure it's not safe to extrapolate like that when there are obvious physical differences.  An attempt to find rebrands of the same model hasn't turned up much yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on November 22, 2012, 11:39:54 AM
By the way: yes, I know black friday starts tomorrow.  I'm still tempted.

EDIT

While I'm at it asking stupid questions: DDR3 for an i5 750.  If I stick a DDR3-1600 kit in the x10 multiplier of the processor will limit the frequency to 667/1333 at stock frequencies anyways, right?  Would there be any point to buying DDR3-1600 (i.e. is it better binned and therefore maybe I could squeeze tighter timings / better overclocks out of it)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2012, 12:18:52 PM
Happy Thanksgiving!

Parents are wondering about netbooks for my aunt, but I saw Trippy's post from last month about netbooks. Aunt needs email and a fully functioning web experience for a variety of things that take tablets out of the equation.

Any recommendations on ultrabooks in the $500 range? And do any include dedicated 3G/4G/LTE connections or are those modems still separate?
How good is your aunt's eyesight?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2012, 12:24:51 PM
Doctor Trippy, can I get a consult. (http://ncix.com/products/?sku=66286&vpn=M12II%20750&manufacture=Seasonic%20Electronics&promoid=1209) (or anyone who keeps up to date on these things, really)  I can't find much if anything on the intarwebs about this particular model.
The Seasonic M12II is a solid choice. There are more efficient power supplies these days (Silver, Gold, Platinum) if you care about that sort of thing. Do you really need 750W? I.e. are you planning on multiple video cards? If you have a case with the power supply mount on the bottom and you like having a clean cabling look you will want to Google around and see if the motherboard power cables are long enough for your case/motherboard combination.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2012, 12:31:38 PM
While I'm at it asking stupid questions: DDR3 for an i5 750.  If I stick a DDR3-1600 kit in the x10 multiplier of the processor will limit the frequency to 667/1333 at stock frequencies anyways, right?  Would there be any point to buying DDR3-1600 (i.e. is it better binned and therefore maybe I could squeeze tighter timings / better overclocks out of it)?
Yes DDR3-1333 would be the memory speed at stock frequency. DDR3-1600 may be better if you plan on overclocking but you also need to look at the latency specs. Often the higher frequency memory will have longer latencies.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on November 22, 2012, 02:39:44 PM
So basically I'd need to find out what the spec is for a given module of DDR3-1600 is at 1333.  Which probably means tracking down what chips were used to assemble that module.

I'm looking at a PSU (and memory) because of some minor graphical glitching and artifacting that I couldn't pin down.  I may have figured it out in the process of sussing out memory purchasing stuff with the help of CPU-Z.  For some reason completely unbeknownst to me, my memory was set to 9-9-9-24-1T @ 1.5v when the XMP profile I had selected was 7-7-7-21-2T @ 1.35v.  It may have been a wonky BIOS flash (I did one recently).  It is a mystery.  Anyways, I'm impressed.

I'd be buying a big PSU for future-proofing more than anything rather than something I need in the now.  I'm not too concerned with efficiency ratings because the value of the 80+ rating system is dubious (http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/856).  My current PSU probably has no real headroom once you factor aging caps, and since a difference of 250 watts is $20 depending on the day it seems like not a bad spot to overbuild within reason.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2012, 02:43:51 PM
So basically I'd need to find out what the spec is for a given module of DDR3-1600 is at 1333.  Which probably means tracking down what chips were used to assemble that module.

I'm looking at a PSU (and memory) because of some minor graphical glitching and artifacting that I couldn't pin down.  I may have figured it out in the process of sussing out memory purchasing stuff with the help of CPU-Z.  For some reason completely unbeknownst to me, my memory was set to 9-9-9-24-1T @ 1.5v when the XMP profile I had selected was 7-7-7-21-2T @ 1.35v.  It may have been a wonky BIOS flash (I did one recently).  It is a mystery.  Anyways, I'm impressed.
Download FurMark (http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/) and see if that's glitching. Graphical glitching is often a defective card (I had a bad 560ti that I confirmed using FurMark).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on November 22, 2012, 02:50:42 PM
I downloaded it weeks ago, I may just not be torturing it long enough.  I've done that dance before.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2012, 02:53:17 PM
Then it's probably not the card so yeah you might want to burn a memtest86 disc and try that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on November 22, 2012, 03:41:39 PM
Expecting to drop a reasonable amount of cash on hardware over the weekend. Are i5s still the way to go for gaming performance or are AMD's more recent offerings worth looking at?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2012, 03:48:08 PM
AMD is still not worth looking at. i5 3570K is still the way to go.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on November 22, 2012, 03:54:07 PM
Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Threash on November 25, 2012, 08:41:05 AM
How can i tell if something is a monitor or videocard problem? the screen goes black for several seconds at a time and when it doesn't sometimes it is shaky.  I just plugged in this monitor to the computer, the last one completely gave out (i tried it on a diff computer and didn't work at all) but it has been sitting in a closet collecting dust for years.  Device manager doesn't seem to think there is anything wrong with the videocard but two monitors malfunctioning at the same time strikes me as a bit odd.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on November 25, 2012, 01:46:29 PM
What are you using as a cable?  My HDMI cable has a tendency to lose signal if I bump it too hard.  This is why DVI and VGA had those little screws, I imagine.
Do you ever get a "the driver stopped working and had to be restarted" notification?
Furmark. (http://www.geeks3d.com/20120911/furmark-1-10-2-gpu-burn-in-videocard-vga-stress-test-opengl-nvidia-geforce-amd-radeon/)  Make it beg for mercy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on November 26, 2012, 02:10:23 PM
How can i tell if something is a monitor or videocard problem? the screen goes black for several seconds at a time and when it doesn't sometimes it is shaky.  I just plugged in this monitor to the computer, the last one completely gave out (i tried it on a diff computer and didn't work at all) but it has been sitting in a closet collecting dust for years.  Device manager doesn't seem to think there is anything wrong with the videocard but two monitors malfunctioning at the same time strikes me as a bit odd.

Sounds like what was happening with my card.  Have you tried re-seating the card and making sure it's fastened securely.  My huge-ass 470 Twin Frozr was so heavy that it was wiggling itself out of the PCI-E slot and causing all sorts of weirdness.

And that was the second card.  First one I had to RMI.  One of the fans went bad and then the second started going bad as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Draegan on November 30, 2012, 07:26:51 AM
Looking at the Lenovo Yoga Ideapads, what would the performance difference be between the 4GB and the 8GB versions on this specific machine?  The 8GB is supposedly on a 4-8 week backorder and there seems to be some of the 4GB in stock at a local Best Buy.

Other than the extra $100 is it a bigger performance hit?  I have zero experience or knowledge about the operation of Windows 8.  I think the biggest use of this thing will be messing around with photoshop and maybe try to get an old MMO on it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 30, 2012, 11:03:54 AM
For Photoshop you'll likely want 8 GB (or as much as it can hold). For MMOs 4 GB is fine as long as you shut down your other apps before playing (browsers are huge memory hogs). Download the user manual(s) for that model and see how hard it is to add memory to it yourself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Draegan on November 30, 2012, 12:44:30 PM
Yeah I bought a 4gb version when I realized an 8gb stick is 30 bucks and ill I have to do is lift up the keyboard. Save myself 70 bucks.

Now I just have to find the best memory for the laptop since I've never bought laptop memory before.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 01, 2012, 05:16:40 AM
Yeah I bought a 4gb version when I realized an 8gb stick is 30 bucks and ill I have to do is lift up the keyboard. Save myself 70 bucks.

Now I just have to find the best memory for the laptop since I've never bought laptop memory before.

Find the specs of the type of RAM you need, buy Crucial or Kingston and you should be good. (They both have very good quality control and a lifetime warranty/good support)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on December 14, 2012, 03:22:51 AM
So the builders did something that tripped the power for a split second and it seems to have toasted the HDD in my computer. The system hangs at the first loading screen (before windows) and then gives an error:

ACHI Port0 Device Error
Press F2 to Resume

F2 takes me into the BIOS menu and as far as I can tell the computer can't detect a HDD anymore.

I managed to boot to Ubuntu from a USB, and from there I can't see any filesystem, so I'm assuming whatever the builders did has killed my HD for good?

If anyone has any advice that would be great; I'm not much of a hardware guy so I don't even know how to find out what sort of HDD I might want to buy as a replacement (assuming I need one) let alone how I might go about recovering the data off my old HDD (if that's even possible).

Ugh, and then I just have to reinstall everything... joy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 14, 2012, 05:15:22 AM
Did you try moving the drive to a different SATA port on the motherboard? It could just be that the port got fried and not the drive itself.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on December 14, 2012, 05:48:27 AM
Thanks for the suggestion, I just tried that and now I get ACHI Port1 Device Error instead. If I look at what's connected to what in the BIOS Menu it lists a Hard Drive as connected to SATA1, but states its size as 0MB. So I'm guessing the port is fine, and it's the HDD that is toast?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 14, 2012, 09:03:41 AM
Switch the hard drive setting in your BIOS from ACHI to IDE to see if that changes anything. Or if you have a USB external hard drive case or dock stick it in there and see if you can mount it. For Linux you need to make sure you have a driver installed for the NTFS file system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 14, 2012, 03:29:59 PM
Also,if your DVD/CD drive is SATA, plug that into Port0 and see if that is detected in BIOS. Its still not entirely conclusive, since there's a slim chance that your Mass Storage Controller (ie, the intel chipset that controls sata connections) is fucked in such a way that it sees a DVD/CD but not an HDD. Slim, but possible.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on December 15, 2012, 03:54:46 PM
Thanks for the suggestions. I have been out all day, but I'll give them a try.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on December 17, 2012, 03:23:28 PM
It's possible that that only the hard disk controller is fried, since it's not reporting anything.  So you may be able to salvage the data off of it fairly cheaply depending on how much your local repair shops like to gouge you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 18, 2012, 03:15:35 AM
How the hell does one export from Thunderbird 17 to Outlook ?

GAH.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 18, 2012, 04:39:39 AM
How the hell does one export from Thunderbird 17 to Outlook ?

GAH.


Select the mailbox, Events and Tasks -> Export? 

EDIT: BAH never mind, that is a Lightning addon thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 18, 2012, 07:55:49 AM
Forward everything?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 18, 2012, 08:17:51 AM
Create another account within Thunderbird that points to the Outlook server and drag and drop all the messages from the original account to the new one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 18, 2012, 09:15:01 AM
Damn.  That would have been a good idea.

I did it the opposite way.  I created another Outlook account that pointed to the Thunderbird IMAP and then dragged them the other way.

But I like the way you think.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on December 30, 2012, 01:04:06 PM
I'm trying to work on an older computer and I've reached that stage in troubleshooting where I'm down to "replace everying one component at a time and see it that fixes it".  But I've grown quite weary of fighting with the case.  So I had the grand idea of laying out all the components on a bench top (not screwed or fastened to anything), hooking everything together and firing it up.  Then I have easy access to memory, GFX card, power supp, etc. and can swap them at will till I locate the problem.

HOWEVER, I am also sure that this is a bad idea.  Static is my main worry.  Can anyone suggest a good surface that would make this idea viable?  If I grounded the legs on a cafeteria table (my current workbench) would that be sufficient?  Is there some sort of vynil sheeting (like the anti-static bags most stuff comes in) I could put down ?

Any suggestions would be welcome.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2012, 02:56:38 PM
What are the symptoms?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on December 30, 2012, 04:16:03 PM
What are the symptoms?


Northbridge on an K8N-Neo4 motherboard burned up.  I got a refurbed motherboard from China to replace it, but I can't even get the damned thing to post.   I power it up, the fans all spin for about 2 seconds, then it shuts down again.

I have to get it working, becasue I had two drives in a RAID 0 config, using the onboard Raid controller.  Several folks have told me since I got the exact same chipset to act as the raid controller, it will probably be able to read the drives in the RAID config.  The drives have the pics of my daughter from age 4 to 7, so I'd really like to get this working.  Not life critical, but important enough.

Anyway, I've been fighting with this thing for about a year.  I'll work on it for a weekend, get totally frustrated, and not touch it for a few months.  Like I said above, I'm now down to the hot swapping stage, and just want to spread out all the components and not have to worry about snaking my largish hands into tiny, tiny spaces and bending connector pins while plugging and unplugging stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2012, 05:17:18 PM
Remove all the addon cards if they have nothing to do with your need to pull data off the RAID.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2012, 06:17:59 PM
I'm trying to work on an older computer and I've reached that stage in troubleshooting where I'm down to "replace everying one component at a time and see it that fixes it".  But I've grown quite weary of fighting with the case.  So I had the grand idea of laying out all the components on a bench top (not screwed or fastened to anything), hooking everything together and firing it up.  Then I have easy access to memory, GFX card, power supp, etc. and can swap them at will till I locate the problem.

HOWEVER, I am also sure that this is a bad idea.  Static is my main worry.  Can anyone suggest a good surface that would make this idea viable?  If I grounded the legs on a cafeteria table (my current workbench) would that be sufficient?  Is there some sort of vynil sheeting (like the anti-static bags most stuff comes in) I could put down ?

Any suggestions would be welcome.
Anything that doesn't conduct electricity is fine. I've powered motherboards outside of a case on lots of different surfaces like wood (a table top) or cardboard (the motherboard box) or on top of the anti-static bag the motherboard came in (which you probably don't have). If you are really worried, install some standoffs on the motherboard so that it's elevated and only the standoffs are touching the surface.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 30, 2012, 08:07:19 PM
Trying to fix a friend's machine that I built a few years ago.

Its an i7 build on a p6t Asus mobo.

He went from a HD 4XXX card to one of the truly badass 7950's, its the 3GB OC'd Sapphire Vapor-X card. Before I got to it this happened:

-There was some artifacting on the desktop. From online info he went with updating the BIOS (makes sense to me, the card is pcie 3.0) so he set the bios to ASUS's 1408 version with no issues.

-Since the Bios update he's getting BSODs in games that say the cpu is overheating. That's not to say that with the older Bios he wouldn't have gotten same issues. He never got around to playing games until the desktop shit was cleared up by the update.

From everything I can figure it seems like it could be a legit heat issue. The system is idling at high 50's low 60's but if I even start up Torchlight 2 (which is the biggest offender although Borderlands2 and GW2 will cause the BSOD just not as fast) without entering the game I see core temps in CPUID's hardware monitor jump to 90 C.

What is this card doing that is causing the cpu to get so heat stressed? I mean granted its fucking huge and beastly compared to the last one but I'm not seeing a ton of info online and I'm lost.


I've tested the newer Bios with the old card in TL2 and the game played at the same temp that the start screen idles on with the newer card.

The 7950 has a pretty advanced cooling system on it and according to hardware monitor and ATI's catalyst center the card itself is having zero heat issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2012, 08:26:55 PM
Was he on the newest catalyst drivers before the upgrade?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2012, 08:30:14 PM
Sounds like you might have some airflow issues in the case. How are things if you run with the side of the case off? Is the new video card in the slot closest to the CPU or as far away as possible?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 30, 2012, 08:32:59 PM
Was he on the newest catalyst drivers before the upgrade?

No the latest 4XXX drivers I don't think are even the same as the latest latest drivers. The 4XXX was on some legacy drivers.

But how could a driver issue cause a real heat problem? Or is there a way it could fool everything into thinking there is a heat problem with the cpu no less?

Sounds like you might have some airflow issues in the case. How are things if you run with the side of the case off? Is the new video card in the slot closest to the CPU or as far away as possible?

The side is off. I was thinking of moving the card to the lower pcie 16x slot which would move it 2" or so away from cpu. I will try that next but is it reasonable for the card to cause something like this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2012, 08:53:05 PM
There could be a bug in the driver that spikes the CPU cycles under high graphics load, thus why I asked.

As for the location thing, if the card placement is either restricting airflow or pushing hot air onto the processor's heat sink it could be contributing to the heat. Does he have a stock heatsink/fan or is he using an aftermarket cooler?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Raging Turtle on December 30, 2012, 08:58:40 PM
I could use some advice on the next step to take for getting my 2011 Macbook Air screen replaced.  The glass was cracked (my fault) and the screen was 'bleeding' black ink (or whatever it is, it was all internal in the screen) around the edges and cracks.

I sent it in to a shop because they guaranteed they could do it in a week and I don't trust myself to replace it on my own - apparently macbook airs are tricky?  3 weeks and several defective or missing parts later, they want ME to order the necessary part and have it shipped to them, probably so they don't lose any more money doing it themselves  :uhrr:

They also say that upon replacing the screen, they saw that the inverter wasn't working - but if that's just the part that makes (or help makes) the screen light up, then it was working just fine when I sent it in.  What are the odds they broke that?

Anyway, I've copied their email detailing the situation below.  Somebody please let me know if I should just ask for it back and take it in to Apple (where the replacement would probably cost $500-800, hard to get an exact estimate) or demand they order the part themself and give me a discount.  Thanks.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2012, 09:18:19 PM
What's your MacBook Air model number? Or be more specific about the model (13" vs. 11", etc.).

Repairing a MacBook screen is extremely difficult. It's very possible they broke something taking the display assembly apart. Your best bet at this point is to replace the entire display assembly as suggested rather than trying to have them or somebody else fix your now taken apart display assembly.

We actually had this discussion a couple of months ago. You can see a video of what it takes to take apart a display assembly here:

http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=14149.msg1123849#msg1123849


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Raging Turtle on December 30, 2012, 09:36:59 PM
Yeah that was me asking the question :awesome_for_real: The cracks and bleeding finally spread until it was time to do something.

The model is A1369 13” screen.  Are you suggesting I just ask for my computer back and try to do it myself?  In the email I spoilered they suggested doing the whole screen as well - of course they want me to pay for the whole screen myself, rather than the problem that I brought in  :oh_i_see:



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2012, 10:08:28 PM
Sounds like you might have some airflow issues in the case. How are things if you run with the side of the case off? Is the new video card in the slot closest to the CPU or as far away as possible?
The side is off. I was thinking of moving the card to the lower pcie 16x slot which would move it 2" or so away from cpu. I will try that next but is it reasonable for the card to cause something like this?
Have you tried running a CPU burn in test like CPU Burn-In or Prime95? It's possible the CPU has always been running hot but now that games are no longer GPU-bound they are really taxing the CPU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2012, 10:15:02 PM
Yeah that was me asking the question :awesome_for_real: The cracks and bleeding finally spread until it was time to do something.

The model is A1369 13” screen.  Are you suggesting I just ask for my computer back and try to do it myself?  In the email I spoilered they suggested doing the whole screen as well - of course they want me to pay for the whole screen myself, rather than the problem that I brought in  :oh_i_see:
Well you would only save the $99 if you did the reassembly yourself and who knows if they'll screw something up putting things back in for you to do the reassembly yourself since they'll have no way of knowing they put things back together properly. I wanted your specific model so I could check prices. ifixit has your display assembly (http://www.ifixit.com/MacBook-Parts/MacBook-Air-13-Inch-Late-2010-Mid-2011-Display-Assembly/IF188-050) for $499 if you return your broken one to them ($599 otherwise) but that's a used (i.e. refurbished) display, so the prices you were quoted are within the ballpark.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 31, 2012, 06:54:20 AM
Sounds like you might have some airflow issues in the case. How are things if you run with the side of the case off? Is the new video card in the slot closest to the CPU or as far away as possible?
The side is off. I was thinking of moving the card to the lower pcie 16x slot which would move it 2" or so away from cpu. I will try that next but is it reasonable for the card to cause something like this?
Have you tried running a CPU burn in test like CPU Burn-In or Prime95? It's possible the CPU has always been running hot but now that games are no longer GPU-bound they are really taxing the CPU.

Trippy, you just blew my fucking mind. Thanks dude I'll tackle it from that angle and let you guys know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on December 31, 2012, 01:46:27 PM
Or perhaps the CPU cooler was knocked off slightly when the graphics card was replaced.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on January 01, 2013, 03:15:25 PM
Reseating or replacing with a good aftermarket cooler is the direction I've been heading. Don't see any sign that it had been knocked.

I've run prime95 torture testing to 100% cpu with the new card and the old card and the cpu temps show no difference.

So how can the video card, which isn't been taxed at all be generating enough heat or heat in the wrong place perhaps to almost instantly overheat the cpu to the point of bsod...

I'm going to look at driver options and try the other pcie slot next.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 02, 2013, 08:08:59 AM
Sounds like the cpu just needs a better cooler, or its thermal paste redone.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 02, 2013, 09:35:17 AM
Reseating or replacing with a good aftermarket cooler is the direction I've been heading. Don't see any sign that it had been knocked.

I've run prime95 torture testing to 100% cpu with the new card and the old card and the cpu temps show no difference.

So how can the video card, which isn't been taxed at all be generating enough heat or heat in the wrong place perhaps to almost instantly overheat the cpu to the point of bsod...

I'm going to look at driver options and try the other pcie slot next.

When you run Prime95 do you also get the overheating, or only when you're launching Torchlight?

My thoughts that its the interface between video and cpu/northbridge that's at fault. Try down-throttling the ATI card using the ATI overclock utility so that less data's pushed between cpu/motherboard and vid card and see how that does.

The BSOD shouldn't happen before your CPU gets automatically downclocked, so it sounds like something else (northbridge chipset?) overheating, but due to the limited hardware reporting tools, its being reported as CPU overheat.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 02, 2013, 10:32:24 AM
Reseating or replacing with a good aftermarket cooler is the direction I've been heading. Don't see any sign that it had been knocked.

I've run prime95 torture testing to 100% cpu with the new card and the old card and the cpu temps show no difference.

So how can the video card, which isn't been taxed at all be generating enough heat or heat in the wrong place perhaps to almost instantly overheat the cpu to the point of bsod...

I'm going to look at driver options and try the other pcie slot next.
Do you have a floor fan you can blow into the side of your open case?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on January 02, 2013, 07:41:46 PM
Reseating or replacing with a good aftermarket cooler is the direction I've been heading. Don't see any sign that it had been knocked.

I've run prime95 torture testing to 100% cpu with the new card and the old card and the cpu temps show no difference.

So how can the video card, which isn't been taxed at all be generating enough heat or heat in the wrong place perhaps to almost instantly overheat the cpu to the point of bsod...

I'm going to look at driver options and try the other pcie slot next.

Out of curiosity, what case is it in and what CPU cooler is on it now?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 03, 2013, 01:47:08 AM
Anyone used any decent unnatended backups to S3 ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 03, 2013, 02:07:14 AM
Anyone used any decent unnatended backups to S3 ?
Are you using EC2 and EBS volumes as well?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 03, 2013, 05:23:36 PM
I use Gladinet Cloud Desktop (free version). Mounts your S3 volume as a drive and you drag-drop files to upload - it manages the upload process. Could use this with automated backup to the drive too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 08, 2013, 04:56:18 AM
I think Ingmar's computer aids got my PC now.  PC won't turn on and the fan on the power supply doesn't spin-up at all so I think the PS is fried.  Anything else I should check that it could be?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 08, 2013, 05:28:55 AM
Do you have another power supply you can use just to see if it the motherboard POSTs?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on January 08, 2013, 05:37:07 AM
I think Ingmar's computer aids got my PC now.  PC won't turn on and the fan on the power supply doesn't spin-up at all so I think the PS is fried.  Anything else I should check that it could be?

If this is the same machine you posted in the SWtoR thread way back, I'd wager it's most likely the PSU as well - everything else was pretty quality stuff, but unless you spec a brand name unit, iBuypower puts pretty shitty power supplies in their boxes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 08, 2013, 05:56:38 AM
Do you have another power supply you can use just to see if it the motherboard POSTs?

Yeah I have the machine I replaced, I didn't bother trying to swap it last night, though as I've been sick and just wanted to hit the bed at 8:30.

I think Ingmar's computer aids got my PC now.  PC won't turn on and the fan on the power supply doesn't spin-up at all so I think the PS is fried.  Anything else I should check that it could be?

If this is the same machine you posted in the SWtoR thread way back, I'd wager it's most likely the PSU as well - everything else was pretty quality stuff, but unless you spec a brand name unit, iBuypower puts pretty shitty power supplies in their boxes.

Yep, it is.  Previous problem was corrupted drivers that a windows reinstall fixed, but as I tried to do that again yesterday the power supply went kaput. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 08, 2013, 08:41:45 AM
So my work machine is a Dell Optiplex 790 (w7 pro 64bit) with a Radeon HD6350 card in it.  I was kind of hoping to pimp this up to 4 monitors by adding a cheap 2nd video card, so for $35 I bought a Asus HD 5450 Silent (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121447&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleAdwords&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-_-pla-_-NA-_-NA&gclid=CLOf9u6Y2bQCFayPPAodSEAACA) I popped it in there but if I connect a monitor to it I get a bluescreen when it attempts to detect the display (Display also gets some weird slanted red checkerboard pattern over part of it).  Now the crappy monitor I am attaching is VGA only and I only had 1 slot available on the machine so I had to ditch the VGA port as it requires a 2nd slot for the low profile option, so I am using a DVI->VGA adapter (I have tried 2 of them oddly both with slightly different pin outs).

Any ideas or just return card for a different model?

edit:  This is a small form factor machine so I am thinking that the 240w PSU is possibly causing a problem. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on January 08, 2013, 12:28:50 PM
Have you tried it with just the new card? My guess is 240 isn't enough juice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 08, 2013, 04:44:22 PM
So my work machine is a Dell Optiplex 790 (w7 pro 64bit) with a Radeon HD6350 card in it.  I was kind of hoping to pimp this up to 4 monitors by adding a cheap 2nd video card, so for $35 I bought a Asus HD 5450 Silent (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121447&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleAdwords&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-_-pla-_-NA-_-NA&gclid=CLOf9u6Y2bQCFayPPAodSEAACA) I popped it in there but if I connect a monitor to it I get a bluescreen when it attempts to detect the display (Display also gets some weird slanted red checkerboard pattern over part of it).  Now the crappy monitor I am attaching is VGA only and I only had 1 slot available on the machine so I had to ditch the VGA port as it requires a 2nd slot for the low profile option, so I am using a DVI->VGA adapter (I have tried 2 of them oddly both with slightly different pin outs).

Any ideas or just return card for a different model?

edit:  This is a small form factor machine so I am thinking that the 240w PSU is possibly causing a problem. 

There are also BIOS settings on the 790 you may need to change to multi-view with more than one addon card. (I don't know what they are as we skipped the 790 and went to 7010s from 780s)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Draegan on January 08, 2013, 06:44:09 PM
Anyone know how to unify the Sync polarity of three monitors?  I've got two identical Dells and an odd high def korean monitor.  Damn you Nvidia surround!

Bah. Nevermind.  I need another DVI cable.  How the fuck do two DELL monitors not come with DVI cables.  VGA?  Really?  Now I have to get an HDMI -> DVI adapter tomorrow since apparently I don't own one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 09, 2013, 03:10:33 AM
I think Ingmar's computer aids got my PC now.  PC won't turn on and the fan on the power supply doesn't spin-up at all so I think the PS is fried.  Anything else I should check that it could be?

http://seasonicusa.com/RMABeta/JumpStart/JS.pdf

Which black wire you choose to jumper it to doesn't actually matter.  All black wires are grounds.

If you then plug it in and turn the back switch on it will supply power to anything attached to the various and sundry connectors.  Plugging a Molex fan or cold cathode or what have you will tell you whether it's the mobo or PSU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 09, 2013, 03:45:44 PM
This is my Steam icon:
(https://dl.dropbox.com/u/85916/steam_icon.png)

I don't know how to fix this on Win7.  It's mildly irritating.  I did a reinstall.  Thoughts?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 09, 2013, 04:03:44 PM
http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/how-to-rebuild-the-icon-cache-in-windows-vista/

Could also try unpinning it from the taskbar, delete any shortcuts you have elsewhere, and then recreate them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 09, 2013, 09:03:18 PM
Well, it's not pinned to the taskbar.  I wasn't very clear on that.  But in any case, deleting the icon cache fixed it.  Thanks!  I also learned some things about Win7 processes, I think, but maybe I need to reboot or something.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 21, 2013, 09:58:05 AM
I think Ingmar's computer aids got my PC now.  PC won't turn on and the fan on the power supply doesn't spin-up at all so I think the PS is fried.  Anything else I should check that it could be?

http://seasonicusa.com/RMABeta/JumpStart/JS.pdf

Which black wire you choose to jumper it to doesn't actually matter.  All black wires are grounds.

If you then plug it in and turn the back switch on it will supply power to anything attached to the various and sundry connectors.  Plugging a Molex fan or cold cathode or what have you will tell you whether it's the mobo or PSU.

Didn't have to do this, the PSU was just not properly plugged-in. Reseating it worked out, I guess when I removed the vid card I jostled it and didn't try to reseat until the next day when I calmed down a bit.   Don't fiddle angry!

Turns out the vid card IS fried, though.  I was getting crashes and bluescreens more frequently over the last week, even after deleting and reinstalling the drivers so I picked-up a cheapass $50 card at BB this weekend and Tada, no more crashes, bluescreens or overheats.  No FPS, but hey it's a $50 card.

I'd installed the temp monitor someone mentioned upthread and I was hitting 135-140F on the card just standing around in Skyrim.  MW would heat it up a bit as would WOT, but  turing all the vid settings down to "looks like shit!" still caused a heat problem, so I'm just going to RMA the fucker since it's still under its 3-year warranty.   No need to reseat the sink if I've got things covered that way, I figure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 21, 2013, 01:12:23 PM
140 F / 60 C isn't too hot for a card under moderate load.  You probably just had a card that was on the verge of being binned as something else, or a shit memory chip.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: satael on January 21, 2013, 02:03:54 PM
just google the proper temperature for the card. Some can go pretty high without it being anything unusual. If your card really does operate (correctly) at a high temperature you could consider adding an additional fan into the chassis to blow some air towards it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 21, 2013, 03:55:00 PM
just google the proper temperature for the card. Some can go pretty high without it being anything unusual. If your card really does operate (correctly) at a high temperature you could consider adding an additional fan into the chassis to blow some air towards it.

Side of the case is off right now but when it's on I have 3 20mm fans and a 100mm fan and it's sitting in a wide-open area.  Can't get cooler without actually installing an AC unit.

140 F / 60 C isn't too hot for a card under moderate load.  You probably just had a card that was on the verge of being binned as something else, or a shit memory chip.

Google said it should do fine all the way up to 160 or so, but every time it hit 141, it was a guaranteed  bluescreen or crash within a minute.  All I can do is figure it's a faulty card.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on January 21, 2013, 05:51:30 PM
Hmm.  Maybe the heat sink on a component wasn't on right.  The temperature probe is usually placed to measure the temperature near what is normally the hottest part of the die, but that doesn't mean much if the cooling is incorrectly installed elsewhere.  Or, it could just be a flaky SM or RAM chip that temporarily fails under high heat.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on January 21, 2013, 06:43:11 PM
Just built my box and have a SSD as my primary and my HDD as a backup.  My bios finds both drives, but Windows 7 doesn't recognize my standard HDD.  I have them both plugged into SATA 3 connectors.  Do I need to add hardware in windows to find and format my second HDD?

Any thoughts helpful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 21, 2013, 06:59:58 PM
Go to Administrative Tools -> Computer Management -> Disk Management

Find the drive in the list and then initialize, partition and format it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 21, 2013, 08:52:43 PM
Make sure the SATA port the HDD is connected to is turned on in the BIOS. I have had boards that had some of the higher numbered ports turned off by default.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on January 22, 2013, 07:42:18 AM
Go to Administrative Tools -> Computer Management -> Disk Management

Find the drive in the list and then initialize, partition and format it.


Thanks!  All good now. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 22, 2013, 09:51:48 AM
Would it kill MS to say 'Found some hard drive, can't read it, please go to Disk Management HERE' or something helpful, for a change.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 22, 2013, 09:58:45 AM
Too busy making TOUCH SQUARES.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 22, 2013, 11:14:53 AM
Would it kill MS to say 'Found some hard drive, can't read it, please go to Disk Management HERE' or something helpful, for a change.
MS and the hard drive manufacturers assume that very few end users are installing their own internal drives so Windows doesn't display anything and internal drives are typically not preformatted like external drives are.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2013, 07:35:08 AM
A few questions:

- Is it still recommended to manually set the cache size to 1.5x system memory for win7 64bit when dealing with larger amounts of memory like 12gb/16gb/32gb?

- Using Microsoft Hyper-V VM's if I set 1 VM to be my database server (MS SQL) and another VM to be my webserver (IIS).  If I multihome the VM instances and set up a subnet that doesn't really exist off the box do database queries from the webserver to the database server ever really hit the physical switch or even the physical NIC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 24, 2013, 10:00:26 AM
Is the subnet linked to a physical card?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2013, 10:12:08 AM
Is the subnet linked to a physical card?
I haven't actually tried it yet but I was thinking it would just exist on the virtual host adapter.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 24, 2013, 11:02:51 AM
If you can do that, then it shouldn't ever hit the physical network.  I'm just getting into VMs myself though, so my knowledge is still minimal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2013, 12:19:38 PM
If you can do that, then it shouldn't ever hit the physical network.  I'm just getting into VMs myself though, so my knowledge is still minimal.

what speed would it be? Autonegotiate: infinity!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 24, 2013, 01:09:08 PM
You're still limited by the speed of light.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 24, 2013, 01:20:33 PM
You're still limited by the speed of light.
Yes but the distances are much shorter.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 24, 2013, 05:07:59 PM
If you use an internal-only virtual interface in Hyper-V it will not ever leave the box (the internal only NICs cannot access the physical NICs at all in Hyper-V).

As far as speed, it will be faster than going out and back into the box but won't go plaid or anything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 24, 2013, 06:12:43 PM
Disclaimer that I work on other OSes.  I believe the link speed setting is 64k for hypervisor-only networking.  However communication is at memory-speed, not sure the number has any meaning.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on February 08, 2013, 01:27:59 AM
My 27 inch Catleap monitor appears to be on the brink of failure. If I unplug is it will work for a few seconds. But after a couple seconds it will essentially pixelate and fade to black, then the onscreen menus stop working. Then it crashes the system. Any ideas?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 08, 2013, 03:16:19 AM
Might be a bad power supply capacitor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on February 08, 2013, 11:59:18 PM
Opened up the power supply, it did have a funky smell inside. So I'm guessing that's it. Didn't see any bulges on the caps though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 09, 2013, 05:49:18 AM
Does it have an external brick? You should be able to find one with the same specs without too much hassle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 11, 2013, 07:29:26 AM
Not sure where to post this, so will start here.

I'm once again re-engineering some scripts, mentioned it in another thread or two.  While driving my son to school today I realized that I'm probably re-inventing a wheel or two by laying out the various functions in a excel sheet and attempting to use that as a way to juggle them around.  Wondering if there is some small guide on programming principles which will speed up this process?  I suppose it might be called refactoring, although I don't intend to change the bulk of functions, instead I'm going to move some into separate files.  Before I do that I need to lay out which ones call which ones, then determine how I want it to look in the future.  There must be something better than napkin sketches and excel cells.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 11, 2013, 08:15:02 AM
Not sure where to post this, so will start here.

I'm once again re-engineering some scripts, mentioned it in another thread or two.  While driving my son to school today I realized that I'm probably re-inventing a wheel or two by laying out the various functions in a excel sheet and attempting to use that as a way to juggle them around.  Wondering if there is some small guide on programming principles which will speed up this process?  I suppose it might be called refactoring, although I don't intend to change the bulk of functions, instead I'm going to move some into separate files.  Before I do that I need to lay out which ones call which ones, then determine how I want it to look in the future.  There must be something better than napkin sketches and excel cells.

Some IDE's support refactoring, for example PHPStorm allows you to refactor common boiler plate code into functions or methods, rename stuff, move files and dirs around, etc...  I don't think it has a tool for planning out your refactor but it is pretty handy at helping you orchestrate your grand design.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 11, 2013, 09:25:29 AM
Hmm, I'll see if I can find that.

Anything out there like "Refactoring 101" for people who either didn't take CS or failed out of it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on February 13, 2013, 08:28:58 PM
Ok, starting to build that barebones PC from a few weeks back. Now a separate question (maybe related):

I'd like to get a projector. It would mostly be used for movies. HD/widescreen but I don't care about 3D. I have no idea what to look for and certainly don't trust Best Buy.

Recos?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 13, 2013, 10:14:34 PM
Hmm, I'll see if I can find that.

Anything out there like "Refactoring 101" for people who either didn't take CS or failed out of it?
There's a book by Martin Fowler called "Refactoring", oddly enough, that's the standard. There's also a book called "Design Patterns" by the "gang of four" (Gamma, et al) that ypu may also want to read.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 14, 2013, 08:24:48 AM
Hmm, I'll see if I can find that.

Anything out there like "Refactoring 101" for people who either didn't take CS or failed out of it?

As a neophyte developer myself, I asked my buddy about this.  His recommendations were the Michael Feathers book "Working Effectively with Legacy Code", with a followup of "Clean Code" by Martin. 

His feeling is that the whole refactoring process is cyclical, in which the best code eligible for refactoring is testable code, but the testable code needs to be in a somewhat decently working state.  And the cycle begins anew. 

I don't really have personal experience with it myself; any web code I've written so far I've left after a week and never touched again. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on February 27, 2013, 11:27:20 AM
So I ended up getting the Dell...seems pretty nice so far, but haven't gotten a game pulled down on it yet. It's pretty sleek, though I wish there wasn't nearly as many odd bloatware programs installed...

Just an update, but wanted to say that the Dell Inspiron that I purchased last year (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0081YPUS4/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0081YPUS4/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1)) has been totally worth the $1000 I paid for it. Has great performance, the screen is OK; it just does whatever I want it to. And it's lightweight and sharply designed, to boot. The battery life is pretty OK, though it understandably tanks a bit if it's off the powerpack while you're gaming. It runs WoT and XCOM very nicely without issues.

Sooo, thanks Trippy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 27, 2013, 11:40:14 AM
NP.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on March 03, 2013, 08:50:53 AM
Hmm, so my iPod Nano (maybe 4th gen? Purchased Sept 2009) inexplicably stopped playing music today. It didn't seem frozen, all the menus worked, and I could still get sound (menu sounds, radio). The songs are still coming up, but not playing (the play button works, but shows a track length of zero seconds).

I get back today and read online to remember how to do a hard restart - but now all my songs are gone. Does this sound like a dead iPod? The files appear to still be there, as the iPod reports only about 100mb free.

If it's not actually dead and just needs to be hooked back up to my PC at home to upgrade software or re-download music, that's fine, though I'd rather be able to use it for the remainder of this week.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 23, 2013, 06:56:29 PM
Anyone try using a Chromebook?  My kid is starting to get to the point where she needs a PC, lots of web math games and Club Penguin.  Google Docs integration for her diary would be great.  Plus, $250 is pretty hard to beat. 

Any advice would be great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on March 24, 2013, 01:54:41 AM
Anyone been having issues with the new nVidia drivers? Using 314.07 with my GTX 260, and I've started to get fairly frequent driver crashes in Win7...really annoying when I'm trying to play World of Tanks. Occasionally the drivers crash just when browsing.

Not seeing any other video-related problems, so I'm thinking this is a software problem vice hardware. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on March 26, 2013, 05:52:11 AM
Anyone have concrete info on the rumor that the new GPU's for both NVIDIA and AMD have been delayed until q4? I was hoping to replace my aging 8800 soon. It's been freezing up a lot, and it's probably about to crap itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 26, 2013, 01:33:13 PM
Anyone been having issues with the new nVidia drivers? Using 314.07 with my GTX 260, and I've started to get fairly frequent driver crashes in Win7...really annoying when I'm trying to play World of Tanks. Occasionally the drivers crash just when browsing.

Not seeing any other video-related problems, so I'm thinking this is a software problem vice hardware. :oh_i_see:
314.22 is the latest WHQL driver. You should should also clean out your old driver files before installing any new ones. You can do that through the installer by selecting "Customize" during install.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 26, 2013, 01:37:28 PM
Anyone have concrete info on the rumor that the new GPU's for both NVIDIA and AMD have been delayed until q4? I was hoping to replace my aging 8800 soon. It's been freezing up a lot, and it's probably about to crap itself.
Which new GPUs? NVIDIA next architecture -- Maxwell -- is delayed until 2014 but that was announced last year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sheepherder on March 27, 2013, 02:05:05 PM
314.22 is the latest WHQL driver. You should should also clean out your old driver files before installing any new ones. You can do that through the installer by selecting "Customize" during install.
Worth noting: don't use any sort of standalone driver cleaning utility.    Some of them are not very discriminating in what they trash.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on March 28, 2013, 12:03:34 PM
314.22 is the latest WHQL driver. You should should also clean out your old driver files before installing any new ones. You can do that through the installer by selecting "Customize" during install.

Could this be accomplished by simply re-running the installer and doing as you suggest?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 28, 2013, 12:15:54 PM
Yes you can do a clean install doing a reinstall of your current drivers. The selection is "Custom", though, not "Customize" like I said above.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 24, 2013, 05:43:13 PM
Everytime I have to reboot my router, Windows 7 takes AGES (like I'd have to leave it alone for twenty minutes or so) to detect the wireless connection is back up.

My phone, my xbox, ipad -- everything else sees a solid, regular connection as soon as it reboots. Windows? Nada. I have to manually disable and enable the connection to get it to see it again -- and it's still hosed up a bit. (Tracert finds errors between my PC and the wireless -- lots of timeout problems).

Any idea how to fix this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 24, 2013, 11:05:58 PM
Reboot the Windows box too :awesome_for_real:

Does

ipconfig /release
ipconfig /renew

speed things up?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 25, 2013, 12:07:34 AM
Try Merge or delete network connections Link to instructions (http://www.sevenforums.com/network-sharing/130473-rename-delete-merge-your-network-connections.html).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 27, 2013, 09:15:21 AM
Two unrelated:

1. What's a good way to block my kids from seeing explicit content on YouTube? I think there's a setting in Google but I always clear cache on exit of Chrome. If the only way to block content on YT is to be logged into a kids-friendly account on Google then I'd configure the browser on the OS account I have for them to not clear cache.

2. How exactly does iPhone camera - cloud - photo stream work? Like, I thought it was that any picture/video taken went into photostream and therefore wasn't eating space on the phone. But I'm perpetually out of space with no way to limited the size of the photo stream cache, and then recently realized all pictures I ever took are still in the "camera" app folder. What I want is what I thought it did: take picture -> upload to photostream -> take file off phone.
2a. And does photostream keep every picture ever taken? I recall something about only the recent X amount?
2b. And what does backup-to-cloud do? I have that storage space for backups, but not sure what's going there (and my important things are in Google Docs anyway)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 27, 2013, 11:36:18 AM
Two unrelated:

1. What's a good way to block my kids from seeing explicit content on YouTube? I think there's a setting in Google but I always clear cache on exit of Chrome. If the only way to block content on YT is to be logged into a kids-friendly account on Google then I'd configure the browser on the OS account I have for them to not clear cache.
Instructions here -- not sure how effective they are, though:

http://www.safesearchkids.com/youtube-parental-controls.html

Quote
2. How exactly does iPhone camera - cloud - photo stream work? Like, I thought it was that any picture/video taken went into photostream and therefore wasn't eating space on the phone. But I'm perpetually out of space with no way to limited the size of the photo stream cache, and then recently realized all pictures I ever took are still in the "camera" app folder. What I want is what I thought it did: take picture -> upload to photostream -> take file off phone.
2a. And does photostream keep every picture ever taken? I recall something about only the recent X amount?
Photo Stream is meant to be a synchronization mechanism, not a backup solution, for sharing photos onto a Mac or PC or another iOS device.  If you can't physically sync your iPhone to a Mac or PC (which will sync your photos), you can use Photo Stream to sync that way. Your iPhone will send new stuff to Photo Stream and then a Mac or PC you can download those images locally.

Photo Stream and iCloud only store your photos temporarily. Do not try and use it for as a backup solution.

http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4486

Quote
2b. And what does backup-to-cloud do? I have that storage space for backups, but not sure what's going there (and my important things are in Google Docs anyway)
Nobody else knows so you are in good company there. No seriously, iCloud does not "just work". I wouldn't rely on it to keep even the stuff that's on there now safe.

Edit: article with some of the issues with iCloud:

http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/26/4148628/why-doesnt-icloud-just-work


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 27, 2013, 12:09:18 PM
Fantastic thanks Trippy. Seems like a few of their half ripe baked things, but glad I asked before I started deleting pictures. Though, those goddamned Toca Salon images my kids keep saving...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: luckton on April 29, 2013, 09:36:26 AM
Alright, story time.

Way back in the day of 2004, I picked up a D-Link DGL-4300 for my home wifi/router solution.  Worked magnificently for years as my router for Comcast cable internet, along with LAN parties and other stuffs.

Last year, we switched to CenturyLink Prism for TV and internet.  It's their new version of DSL that uses fiber to get past the 1.5M cap that most DSL people had/still have; the new stuff gives me a 10M pipe.  It works great, but when we got the service, I had to shelf the DGL-4300, as the device CenturyLink installed was a Cisco DDR2200, a modem/router/wifi device that could also handle the video feeds to the cable boxes and such.

For a while, service was great, but then over time I began noticing that whenever I was pulling down anything large, say, a game client off of Steam, the router would start to bog down, the TV video feed would start to get choppy, and eventually the router would just crash and reboot, resulting in a loss of both internet and TV for about 5 minutes while the system got back up.

Finally got to the point where I said "fuck it".  I took the DGL-4300 out of storage, turned off the DHCP, turned off the wifi on the Cisco device, and hooked the DGL back up.  With the wifi offloaded to the DGL, the system works flawlessly.  No lag now when I pull down large files, TV signal is clean, no more crashes.

Now my new issue is upgrading the DGL.  See, for an over-the-counter router, esp. for the number of power surges and such that it's taken over the last 9 years of use, I can tell it's starting to have it's own little hiccups.  I get occasional lag-spikes while gaming and such; nothing severe, but enough to affect my LoL game a bit.  Plus, there's the whole thing of "I'm now two generations behind in the wifi spec" rocking the 802.11b/g mixed mode.  I'd like to get on-board with the new ac spec.

I know I could just pick up a wifi access point device, but most of what I've seen is selective mode; it's either wireless b/g or n, not simultaneous.  If I want simultaneous, I've got to spring for a full-on router, which won't actually be doing any WAN routing as it was intended to do.  My DGL-4300's descendant, the new DGL-5500 (http://www.dlink.com/us/en/home-solutions/connect/routers/dgl-5500-gaming-router), can do everything I want it to do (dual simultaneous 2.4/5G bands for both b/g and n/ac support, all the latest in wifi tech and tricks), but I feel like I'm wasting part of it by turning it into a simple access point to handle the wifi-work of the Cisco device.

Any thoughts on this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 29, 2013, 10:44:17 AM
Get the full router.  Even if you're only using it as an access point, it off-loads that bit as you say, and you'll still have it if you change service again in a few years.

Plus more ports to mess around with if you get other devices.  Now you can plug your refrigerator and toaster in, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 29, 2013, 02:05:31 PM
Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on May 04, 2013, 04:55:04 PM
I'm posting this in a couple of forums filled with people smarter than me...

I have a PS3. I'd like to run it through my PC, taking input from PS3 and outputting through my video and sound cards, so I can view it on my PC monitor and hear it through my PC speakers. Is this possible? My video card has HDMI connection, but AFAIK it only goes out.

I can hook the PS3 up to my monitor with an HDMI-to-DisplayPort adapter, but since my monitor has no sound capability, this is... not completely helpful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 04, 2013, 06:11:06 PM
I know of no way to use a PC as an HDMI passthru device.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 04, 2013, 06:46:44 PM
I'm posting this in a couple of forums filled with people smarter than me...

I have a PS3. I'd like to run it through my PC, taking input from PS3 and outputting through my video and sound cards, so I can view it on my PC monitor and hear it through my PC speakers. Is this possible? My video card has HDMI connection, but AFAIK it only goes out.

I can hook the PS3 up to my monitor with an HDMI-to-DisplayPort adapter, but since my monitor has no sound capability, this is... not completely helpful.
Yes this is possible but there are other ways to do what you want that are cheaper and easier.

If you really wanted to play your PS3 through your PC the easiest way is to get a capture device that captures component video like this one from Hauppauge (http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hdpvr-gaming.html). This is typically how people make videos of their PS3 or Xbox 360 game play (that aren't just them pointing a video camera at their screen). You can also, in theory, do the same thing with HDMI video, which would give you better quality (in theory), but that requires more esoteric hardware and you have to work around the HDCP copy protection on the video signal. Note that most of these devices introduce some amount of input lag into the game play. Whether or not it's noticeable depends on the game, hardware device, and software used to display the video.

The other way to do this is to not try and play the PS3 video through your PC (the most complicated part) and just have it connected straight to the monitor. Then the only thing to solve is getting the audio signal through your PC speakers. A simple way is getting an audio mixer to attach to your speakers if your speakers can't already handle a secondary input. You could also pass the audio signal from the PS3 into the mic or aux input on your PC sound system and use it as the mixer but that would mean you would have to have your PC on just to get the audio. Another option, which is what I use for some of my consoles, is to get a KVM switch that includes audio switching and switch your monitor and speaker inputs that way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: luckton on May 05, 2013, 08:23:52 AM
I'll vouch for the Hauppauge stuff.  Really simple stuff for getting video feeds into your computer with little hassle.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on May 05, 2013, 09:12:03 PM
Apparently my home Win7 install is several months behind security updates from MS. I think moving my Users folder to my RAID drive borked it up, but Microsoft doesn't even know what this error number is. Stupid jackasses.

Has anyone done the trick of moving the Users folder from C: and still have Windows Update work?

Edit: not only is Windows Update borked, Windows Live is also screwed (won't update) which means DiRT3 won't save my progress.  :sad_panda:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 06, 2013, 05:18:17 AM
Not being able to run windows updates doesn't sound like something that would be broken by the users folder being moved.

Does your event log say anything about the user profile service having errors?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 06, 2013, 05:03:57 PM
So I have a Dell Studio 1747 (Service Tag: 1LJX0M1) and would like to bump the memory up as high as I can for as cheap as I can.  Currently I have 6gb and the largest memory modules Dell recommends on their site for my system are 4gb (http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=A5039688&mfgpid=204715&chassisid=8560) for $45, Newegg has these cheaper but I am not sure how closely it will need to match what I have in my system.  They also state that my system has 2 slots and the max memory is 8gb.  I assume I have a 4gb and a 2gb module installed and I can just order another 4gb to get to 8gb.

I also noticed Newegg has 16gb kits of PC3 10600 (204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM) will my Dell support them?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 07, 2013, 01:38:31 PM
So I took a look at the memory calculator on kingston's site (http://www.kingston.com/us/memory/search?DeviceType=2&Mfr=DEL&Line=Studio&Model=59447) and it too is telling me 8gb is max for this system.  Does anyone know if they are going off the actual chip set used on the MB or are they just taking this from Dell's system specs?'

Also found out it uses the PM55 Express Chipset (http://ark.intel.com/products/42694/Intel-BD82PM55-PCH) and looked that up on Intel's site but it does not specify any memory controller specifics.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 07, 2013, 01:52:09 PM
Which CPU does your laptop have? The memory limitation is coming from the CPU like so:

http://ark.intel.com/products/43122/Intel-Core-i7-720QM-Processor-6M-Cache-1_60-GHz


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on May 07, 2013, 01:54:55 PM
Not being able to run windows updates doesn't sound like something that would be broken by the users folder being moved.

Does your event log say anything about the user profile service having errors?

Nothing specific to that, but am seeing some BFE errors (service doesn't exist) so looking into that. What a PITA - could be a previous virus with files that weren't replaced.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on May 07, 2013, 02:46:11 PM
Hey guys. It sounds like the Hauppage might introduce lag for for games, and wouldn't play the movies at all without some kind of hackery (movies are 85% of why I have the PS3).

Someone on another ofrum suggested a dedicated video capture card like this one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815158317) for my PC. Would that actually work?

I'm somewhat at a loss on the audio if I use direct connection to the monitor. The PS3 has an "optical audio" output port (a name which... just baffles me), but I'm not sure I can make it work with my sound setup. The card is an X-Fi Elite Pro (http://us.store.creative.com/XFi-Elite-Pro/M/B000TKDRCE.htm) (I don't have the I/O Console box with me, but I'm headed home at the end of the month). The speakers are Creative GigaWorks S700, which come with an "audio control pod" with a couple of input ports (closeup image here (http://www.red5audio.com/Graphics/external/other/gigaworkscontrolpod.jpg)).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 07, 2013, 02:59:28 PM
Someone on another ofrum suggested a dedicated video capture card like this one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815158317) for my PC. Would that actually work?
Not without bypassing the HDCP copy protection (which is doable but requires more hardware).

Quote
I'm somewhat at a loss on the audio if I use direct connection to the monitor. The PS3 has an "optical audio" output port (a name which... just baffles me), but I'm not sure I can make it work with my sound setup. The card is an X-Fi Elite Pro (http://us.store.creative.com/XFi-Elite-Pro/M/B000TKDRCE.htm) (I don't have the I/O Console box with me, but I'm headed home at the end of the month). The speakers are Creative GigaWorks S700, which come with an "audio control pod" with a couple of input ports (closeup image here (http://www.red5audio.com/Graphics/external/other/gigaworkscontrolpod.jpg)).
It's really not that complicated. The PS3 can output stereo audio with regular RCA plugs using the standard AV connector (http://www.amazon.com/eForCity-Composite-Video-PLAYSTATION-Packaging-3/dp/B002TK3GYG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1367963870&sr=8-2&keywords=PS3+av+connector+Sony) that came with the system (which you may have lost). Unlike the fucked up Xbox 360 you can by default have both an HDMI cable hooked up and the AV connector hooked up and in the settings you can specify which output should be used for audio. If you really really wanted to output the audio over the PS3 digital audio port you would need something like this guy (http://www.amazon.com/Gefen-GTV-DD-2-AA-Digital-Audio-Decoder/dp/B0021QBIBQ/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=3MKTC2B8J7DYW&coliid=I23RKL2FTMCHSC) and connect it into your audio system (assuming it doesn't have a digital audio input). The input next to the headphone jack on your control pod is the aux input jack for your speakers. You'll need something like this (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000J1H4VI/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1) to convert the RCA plugs on the PS3 AV connector to something you can plug into that input.
 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 07, 2013, 03:29:57 PM
Someone on another ofrum suggested a dedicated video capture card like this one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815158317) for my PC. Would that actually work?
Not without bypassing the HDCP copy protection (which is doable but requires more hardware).
If you really really wanted to use an HDMI capture card here's a decent video explaining the kind of hardware you will need to both bypass HDCP and deal with the input lag issue (there are other ways and hardware to use, this is just one setup):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ny43jZd7d1Q

But really in your situation all you need to do is plug in the stereo audio output on the PS3 to your control box.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 08, 2013, 06:24:25 AM
Which CPU does your laptop have? The memory limitation is coming from the CPU like so:

http://ark.intel.com/products/43122/Intel-Core-i7-720QM-Processor-6M-Cache-1_60-GHz


Wow thanks for that, I had just assumed a 64bit processor wouldn't gimp the memory like that but it does: Core-I7-820QM (http://ark.intel.com/products/43124/Intel-Core-i7-820QM-Processor-8M-Cache-1_73-GHz)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 11, 2013, 04:52:58 PM
I purchased a 3TB SATA internal hard drive without realising that this might not be a straightforward thing to install. When I tried to install Win7 (64bit) on it I got an error at the end of installation claiming that there was an issue with the hardware. Some googling later and I see that this is due to Windows having issues with large hard drives.

I checked the BIOS, and it lists the drive as 801GB and change, which is apparently to be expected. I have installed ubuntu 13.04 on it, and that can see the whole 3TB it seems.

Is there any workaround to get Win7 to see this drive as something it can use? I was wondering if I could partition the drive into two or three partitions each less than 2TB and see if this might let the Win7 install work; however when I tried to partitio the drive during install I didn't seem to have the ntfs option for any partition (just every other possible file system it seemed). Will partitioning the disk get around this problem, and if so, can I resolve this from inside ubuntu? Or am I going to have to return the drive and get a 2Tb one instead?

Many thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 11, 2013, 05:10:08 PM
I purchased a 3TB SATA internal hard drive without realising that this might not be a straightforward thing to install. When I tried to install Win7 (64bit) on it I got an error at the end of installation claiming that there was an issue with the hardware. Some googling later and I see that this is due to Windows having issues with large hard drives.

I checked the BIOS, and it lists the drive as 801GB and change, which is apparently to be expected. I have installed ubuntu 13.04 on it, and that can see the whole 3TB it seems.

Is there any workaround to get Win7 to see this drive as something it can use? I was wondering if I could partition the drive into two or three partitions each less than 2TB and see if this might let the Win7 install work; however when I tried to partitio the drive during install I didn't seem to have the ntfs option for any partition (just every other possible file system it seemed). Will partitioning the disk get around this problem, and if so, can I resolve this from inside ubuntu? Or am I going to have to return the drive and get a 2Tb one instead?

Many thanks.
You need a BIOS that can boot Windows on a drive >2TB. All EFI/UEFI BIOSes can do that. Almost all non-EFI/UEFI BIOSes can not. So you might be screwed. As a secondary drive it only needs need to initialized as GPT for Windows 7 to see the full 3 TB. To see if you can boot from it you can try reinitializing the drive as GPT, reformat it, and then check the BIOS to see if it sees the full 3 TB.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 12, 2013, 02:09:56 AM
Thanks Trippy, I suspected as much, I was just surprised that Linux was happy with the 3TB, I thought that might offer a means around. So I can mount it as a second drive and have it as a 3TB volume fine, but just not as the primary drive? That seems dumb beyond belief...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 12, 2013, 09:46:03 AM
This guide here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/gg463525.aspx) states that UEFI is not necessary to identify a GPT partition, and that its 'self identifying'. So do as Trippy says, install the drive as a secondary drive, format it as GPT, and then see if Windows 7 bootloader/installation disk sees it as a viable medium.

Then again, it also says

Q.   Can Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows Server 2008 read, write, and boot from GPT disks?
    
A.   Yes, all versions can use GPT partitioned disks for data. Booting is only supported for 64-bit editions on UEFI-based systems.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 12, 2013, 02:19:34 PM
Thanks Trippy, I suspected as much, I was just surprised that Linux was happy with the 3TB, I thought that might offer a means around. So I can mount it as a second drive and have it as a 3TB volume fine, but just not as the primary drive? That seems dumb beyond belief...
Newer Linux kernels + the grub2 boot loader can handle booting off of >2 TB hard drives (with GPT) even if the BIOS doesn't have explicit support for it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Shannow on May 13, 2013, 06:13:29 AM
Question on identifying exactly WHAT is wrong with my PC.

PC will now boot up, even gives me login to windows but then screen goes black. Can't appear to click on anything (havent tested exhaustively) but I can ctrl atl tab to taskmaster and then start games....even played a game of FIFA 13 no problems....

I had a cpl of BSOD...sooo corrupted HD? Windows install? Any ideas on how I can figure out exactly which part of my PC I need to fix?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 13, 2013, 08:53:08 AM
Question on identifying exactly WHAT is wrong with my PC.

PC will now boot up, even gives me login to windows but then screen goes black. Can't appear to click on anything (havent tested exhaustively) but I can ctrl atl tab to taskmaster and then start games....even played a game of FIFA 13 no problems....

I had a cpl of BSOD...sooo corrupted HD? Windows install? Any ideas on how I can figure out exactly which part of my PC I need to fix?
In task manager is explorer.exe running? If not what happens if you try and run it? Do you see your desktop if you boot into Safe Mode?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 19, 2013, 11:10:06 AM
So, I exchanged my 3TB harddisk for a 2TB one that matches the one I used to have (now dead), and I seem to have messed something up, because now when I try to install Win7 on it I get an error at the stage where you specify partitions:

"system was unable to create a new system partition or locate an existing system partition"

I did manage to install Win7 professional on the disc when it came straight out of the box, but I realised that I only had a product key for Win7 home premium. So I made a new USB installer, deleted the partitions during the reinstall, but I must have screwed something up, because the installer won't automatically create a new system partition for me.

I can access the command line through the install program, and I can use diskpart to create new partitions, I can even create a new partition called "system" that is listed as a system partition during the install process, but despite that I can't actually install anything there and I get the above error message.

I have set the disk to MBR, I have tried changing pretty much every setting in the BIOS that seems relevant, then I have reset to the defaults and tried again. The only thing I can see that seems off is when I use the 'attributes disk' or 'details disk' commands in diskpart, and the Boot Disk attribute is set to 'No'. I have googled hard, and I can't find any way to set this to 'Yes', and other than that I am out of ideas.

If anyone can shed any light on this that would be great, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 19, 2013, 12:00:46 PM
Do you have anything on the disk?

In cases where I dont have any data I need on the disk, I usually just delete all volumes in the installer and then tell the setup to create a new volume which should set the disk to bootable etc.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2013, 01:29:49 PM
Do you have a 2nd hard drive plugged in as well? If so try it with only the DVD-ROM drive and the hard drive you are trying install onto.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 19, 2013, 01:38:28 PM
Do you have anything on the disk?

In cases where I dont have any data I need on the disk, I usually just delete all volumes in the installer and then tell the setup to create a new volume which should set the disk to bootable etc.

No, it's a brand new disk. It had a Win7 Pro install on it, but it's been reformatted since. One of the reformattings seems to have buggered everything though. For some reason the setup doesn't want to create a bootable volume, and I can't figure out how to manually create one.

Do you have a 2nd hard drive plugged in as well? If so try it with only the DVD-ROM drive and the hard drive you are trying install onto.


It's the only disk in the machine. The only peripheral I had connected other than DVD/Keyboard/Mouse was a USB wifi adapter. I tried installing without that and had no success. Frustratingly the machine won't even install Ubuntu now either, which makes me think that I have somehow broken the disk inadvertently.

I'm trying to install from a USB key. I have the boot order set so the SATA disk has priority, and then manually select boot from USB by hitting F12 at the bios loading screen.

Thanks for the suggestions, if you have any other ideas I'd gladly try them


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2013, 02:00:20 PM
I would delete the entire partition with diskpart and see if the installer will create a new partition and volume for you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 19, 2013, 02:14:16 PM
Gave that a try, it gives me the same error:

"system was unable to create a new system partition or locate an existing system partition"

I tried doing this too (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/297800), but none of the commands are in the right format for diskpart as it exists on my install USB apparently. Also I have no idea if an efi system partition is the thing I want, or what anything else on that page means really. It's all a bit arcane to me...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2013, 02:18:15 PM
No you don't want a GUID partition table, that'll make things worse.

Try using the clean command in diskpart and making sure your hard drive is setup in the BIOS as the first boot drive.

http://windows7forums.com/windows-7-installation-upgrade/75832-setup-unable-create-new-system-partition-locate-existing-system-partition-installation-error.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 19, 2013, 02:53:51 PM
Ok thanks, that clarifies one thing at least, heh.

I have tried that, still no joy.

I tried this:

Code:
Select Disk 0
Clean
Create Partition Primary Size=40000
Select Partition 1
Format fs=ntfs label="System" Quick
Active
Create Partition Primary
Format fs=ntfs Label="Windows" Quick
Assign Letter C
Exit

As I understand it, 'active' should make the partition bootable, but it doesn't. If I do all this and then look at the details I get the following

Code:
DISKPART> detail disk

Disk ID : 2417C0F9
Type : RAID
Status : Online
Path : 0
Target : 0
LUN ID : 0
Location Path : PCIROOT<0>#PCI<1F02>#RAID<P00T00L00>
Current Read-only State : No
Read-only : No
Boot Disk : No
Pagefile Disk : No
Hibernation File Disk : No
Crashdump Disk : No
Clustered Disk : No

Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info
---------- --- ----------- ----- --------- ------- --------- --------
* Volume 1 system NTFS Partition 39 GB Healthy
Volume 2 windows NTFS Partition 1823 GB Healthy

DISKPART> detail volume

Disk ### Status Size Free Dyn Gpt
-------- ------------- ------- ------- --- ---
* Disk 0 Online 1863 GB 0 B

Read-only : No
Hidden : No
No Default Drive Letter : No
Shadow Copy : No
Offline : No
BitLocker Encrypted : No
Installable : Yes

Volume Capacity : 39 GB
Volume Free Space : 38 GB

Switching back to the installer lists the type of Partition 1 as "system" yet it won't let me install there. *sigh*


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2013, 03:04:08 PM
Why are you creating two volumes?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 19, 2013, 03:06:46 PM
I thought I needed to create a separate partition to be the system partition? I won't lie, I'm out of my depth here, hardware really isn't my thing.

I'll try it again with just the one partition.

Edit: It made no difference


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2013, 03:12:35 PM
Turn off RAID in the BIOS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 19, 2013, 03:21:01 PM
I switched it to ATA, that was the only other option.

Still getting the same error during install.

Thanks for taking the time to help Trippy, I appreciate it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 19, 2013, 09:23:52 PM
What does detail disk look like now?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 21, 2013, 06:13:57 AM
I'm confused.  Are you creating the volumes in diskpart then trying to do a windows install?

Nuke the partitions, nuke the volumes, nuke everything.  Don't format.  That's higher level stuff.  Nuke nuke nuke.

With a completely blank disk, what does the Windows installer see?  Does it see volumes or nothing at all?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 22, 2013, 04:51:34 AM
I'm also confused; I've been tryign to manually create a system partition because the windows installer doesn't seem to want to.

If I nuke all the partitions then in setup I see Disc 0: Unallocated xxx, and if I try to hit next I get the "system was unable to create a new system partition or locate an existing system partition"; if I create any arrangement of partitions I get the same error. I really don't know what I did to mess up this disk so bad, all I did was stick it in, install Win7 Pro, then reformat and try again, but somewhere the reformatting broke the disk.

I may just send it back and ask for a replacement if I can't fix this soon.

What does detail disk look like now?


Same as before, only RAID has been replaced by ATA.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 22, 2013, 05:33:24 AM
Are you clicking the "new" option on the volume select screen that says disk 0 unallocated?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 22, 2013, 08:58:25 AM
Yeesh.  I'm not sure what the heck you've managed to do.  I'm about ready to ask you to post pictures from your camera phone so I can see the screen...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on May 22, 2013, 03:28:28 PM
Best I can tell I have managed to make the disk non-bootable in some arcane and irreversible way. Fixing this is above my pay-grade though; I think I'm going to just return the disk and try again.

Thanks for all the time and help though, I appreciate it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on May 23, 2013, 07:51:07 PM
I went ahead and ordered an HDMI-to-DisplayPort and a component audio adapter to connect my PS3 to my PC monitor and surround sound speakers.

Neither of them work.

/headdesk

Since I don't have anything else to connect the PS3 to, I can't even tell if the adapters don't work, or if it's the console. EDIT: When I try to switch the monitor source to the DisplayPort, it says no signal. Likewise I get no indication of a signal through the speakers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 23, 2013, 08:49:28 PM
You'll need to fiddle with the PS3 settings. Remember above I said the PS3 has settings for selecting the audio output. It also has settings for selecting video output.

Under Settings -> Display Settings -> Video Output Settings

make sure it's HDMI and not component that's selected as the video output.

Under Settings -> Sound Settings -> Audio Output Settings

make sure it's "Audio Input Connector / SCART / AV MULTI" that's selected, not HDMI.

You'll probably need to unplug the AV Multi connector so you can get the video output to default to HDMI. Then you can plug in the AV Multi and then switch the audio.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on May 23, 2013, 09:03:55 PM
Thanks to my cousin and his amazing collection of wires and adapters, it's working. The problems appeared to start with the HDMI to DisplayPort adapter being dead - rectified with a cable he had that's HDMI to DVI. Right now I'm swapping cables on the back of the monitor. I can deal with that, can probably get a switcher sometime in the future. Sound is only in stereo of course, but since I'll mostly be playing stereo mixed subtitled anime through it, it's not likely I'll even notice.

So! Panic and despair over a faulty adapter. It's working beautifully now. Eheh.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 23, 2013, 09:08:44 PM
Finally! :drill:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 13, 2013, 02:48:30 AM
What do people use for incremental copying of files if they can't use DFS ?

Like, If I have two folders in different locations and I want to update the second one with only changes ?  I'm using SychroniseIT right now and it's doing odd things and copying shit it shouldn't need to...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on June 13, 2013, 04:15:01 AM
I use FreeFileSync (http://sourceforge.net/projects/freefilesync/).

Be warned, the installer has Yahoo! toolbar AIDS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 13, 2013, 06:57:32 AM
rsync :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on June 13, 2013, 07:31:01 AM
Dropbox.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 13, 2013, 08:17:40 AM
rsync :awesome_for_real:

I figure if someone is working on Windows they hate themselves, so this is a valid answer.

As for my question, I'm in about the same boat that I was a year ago in regard to turning my home movies into playable bluray discs.  At this point I've decided that the device firmware of modern devices isn't going to work with the authoring software that came with my camera, and so I'm forced to consider spending even more money on a tool that will get the job done.  Before I wade into C-NET or something, does anyone have any tips or suggestions?  I'm certainly not going to avoid a linux-based solution, either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 13, 2013, 08:36:38 AM
rsync :awesome_for_real:

I figure if someone is working on Windows they hate themselves, so this is a valid answer.

As for my question, I'm in about the same boat that I was a year ago in regard to turning my home movies into playable bluray discs.  At this point I've decided that the device firmware of modern devices isn't going to work with the authoring software that came with my camera, and so I'm forced to consider spending even more money on a tool that will get the job done.  Before I wade into C-NET or something, does anyone have any tips or suggestions?  I'm certainly not going to avoid a linux-based solution, either.

Is there a reason why you want them on bluray disks as opposed to say on a media server (or even youtube) and able to be streamed to wherever? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 13, 2013, 08:38:28 AM
Is there a reason why you want them on bluray disks as opposed to say on a media server (or even youtube) and able to be streamed to wherever? 

Yes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 13, 2013, 08:52:09 AM
rsync :awesome_for_real:


Actually, I knew I was going to get this answer and I wish to hell it was an option.

Sometimes the right tool for the job is in someone elses toolbox in another country.  Ah well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 13, 2013, 09:09:39 AM
pretty sure you can run rsync on windows with cygwin


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 14, 2013, 04:05:46 AM
How sure can you be without capitals ?  EH ?  ANSWER ME THAT !!!

 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 14, 2013, 06:29:10 AM
Well, there is a rsync in the download list.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 14, 2013, 06:50:29 AM
Well, there is a rsync in the download list.
THIS!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 14, 2013, 10:02:38 AM
pretty sure you can run rsync on windows with cygwin
You can.  I used to do that for machines back at UH.

Edit:  I used this:  cwrsync (https://www.itefix.no/i2/cwrsync).  Looks like they may have given it a GUI now, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 14, 2013, 01:33:53 PM
I have to PAY FOR THIS ?  DAMN YOU SIR !!

 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 17, 2013, 07:02:20 AM
Only if you use the fancy GUI.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on June 27, 2013, 12:36:43 AM
Need some help:  My son's PC seems to be having problems with Windows 7 at the moment...when it boots up in normal mode, it seems to go to the desktop just fine, but you can do literally nothing except move the mouse around.  Cannot boot a CD from this state, either.  Have tried to go into Safe Mode and do a restore, and that seems to boot up to an empty desktop and then hang.  In Safe Mode itself, all the usual stuff seems to work in that mode (can open windows, internet, etc.), but oddly it won't let me run a Windows disk for a re-install...not sure the CD drive is working at all, but I haven't tested that with other discs.  Is the optical drive even supposed to work in Safe Mode?  Can't remember.  At the same time, when I tried to reboot the machine from the DVD drive to start reinstallation, it doesn't seem to recognize it at all.  It seems to give up on installing from the disk and then just attempts to boot normally.

Any thoughts?  I started to think faulty power supply, but then why does it seem to work in Safe Mode.  And then when I think faulty optical disk drive, that doesn't explain why Windows isn't working in normal mode.  And yet, I cannot boot from the disk drive at all.  I am stuck.  I build all of our PCs, and I have not run into something like this before.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on June 27, 2013, 01:42:43 AM
Try making a Win 7 installation disk on a USB key and boot from that, or just a USB boot disk. Could be the SATA interface is fucked?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on June 27, 2013, 01:49:26 AM
That was pretty much going to be my next option (other than opening the case and making sure the connection to the dvd is working).  I find it strange and unlikely that I would have both a drive issue and a windows issue at the same time...unless something else was also going on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on June 27, 2013, 01:50:39 AM
Come to think of it, I have an external DVD drive I can use first, which would be easier then messing with a USB.  Will have to try that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 27, 2013, 09:16:56 AM
Need some help:  My son's PC seems to be having problems with Windows 7 at the moment...when it boots up in normal mode, it seems to go to the desktop just fine, but you can do literally nothing except move the mouse around.  Cannot boot a CD from this state, either.  Have tried to go into Safe Mode and do a restore, and that seems to boot up to an empty desktop and then hang.  In Safe Mode itself, all the usual stuff seems to work in that mode (can open windows, internet, etc.), but oddly it won't let me run a Windows disk for a re-install...not sure the CD drive is working at all, but I haven't tested that with other discs.  Is the optical drive even supposed to work in Safe Mode?  Can't remember.  At the same time, when I tried to reboot the machine from the DVD drive to start reinstallation, it doesn't seem to recognize it at all.  It seems to give up on installing from the disk and then just attempts to boot normally.

Any thoughts?  I started to think faulty power supply, but then why does it seem to work in Safe Mode.  And then when I think faulty optical disk drive, that doesn't explain why Windows isn't working in normal mode.  And yet, I cannot boot from the disk drive at all.  I am stuck.  I build all of our PCs, and I have not run into something like this before.
Can you get to the Event Viewer?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on June 28, 2013, 08:36:06 AM
I can, for all the good it does...might as well be in Martian.  What am I looking for?  Main errors up are System Control Manager and Distributed COM.

External drive not working.  Not recognizing Windows CD (could be an issue with the CD, but I have used it before).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on June 28, 2013, 12:19:48 PM
Install linux on a usb, try booting into that and see what happens. If the cd drive is still inoperable you can rule out any kind of virus or software misconfiguration.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 28, 2013, 03:19:09 PM
I can, for all the good it does...might as well be in Martian.  What am I looking for?  Main errors up are System Control Manager and Distributed COM.

External drive not working.  Not recognizing Windows CD (could be an issue with the CD, but I have used it before).
When you say not recognized do you mean the disk spins but nothing is executed? Or does the disk not even spin?

As for Event Viewer do you see any Critical errors?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 29, 2013, 01:41:43 PM
Cookies in the new Steam client are turned off in the browser so I can't check out through PayPal. Looks like LORD GABEN doesn't want me buying Rogue Legacy and Surgeon Simulator.

Hilarious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on June 29, 2013, 10:08:59 PM
I can, for all the good it does...might as well be in Martian.  What am I looking for?  Main errors up are System Control Manager and Distributed COM.

External drive not working.  Not recognizing Windows CD (could be an issue with the CD, but I have used it before).
When you say not recognized do you mean the disk spins but nothing is executed? Or does the disk not even spin?

As for Event Viewer do you see any Critical errors?


Disk spins, but not recognized.  Same happens with both internal and external drives.

As for critical errors...does that imply the ones with the red triangle?  Because that would primarily be those two listed above.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 30, 2013, 11:28:55 AM
Anyone have some personal experience based thoughts they would like to share on wireless ac?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 08, 2013, 07:26:20 AM
I want to import a CSV into Excel but it's too big.  I'm not sure what my options are during import.  Can it be imported into separate tabs?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 08, 2013, 08:48:09 AM
I want to import a CSV into Excel but it's too big.  I'm not sure what my options are during import.  Can it be imported into separate tabs?
I don't think so, my first reaction would be to just tail the file to slice it into manageable chunks then import those individually.  It isn't elegant but you would probably be finished and on your merry way in pretty short order.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on July 08, 2013, 08:56:14 AM
I want to import a CSV into Excel but it's too big.  I'm not sure what my options are during import.  Can it be imported into separate tabs?

Have you just tried opening it in Excel not importing it? And like Salamok said probably using tail to chunk it up is the simplest solution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 08, 2013, 02:27:47 PM
Looks like the final answer is: Just deal with these 450 individual CSV.  It's some amount more of work, but less so than writing a report generator.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 08, 2013, 03:12:06 PM
Looks like the final answer is: Just deal with these 450 individual CSV.  It's some amount more of work, but less so than writing a report generator.
That is terribad, in this case i would import the file into.an SQL compliant database and generate reports from there. Theoretically you could even connect directly to the CSV file from Excel vía ODBC and pull data in that way but Excel is not tuned to deal with 500 million row data sets so i would not even attempt to use it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 09, 2013, 06:08:00 AM
I did consider it but the small scale means using Access or something else in that league.  We would all rather use awk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 09, 2013, 08:26:20 AM
I did consider it but the small scale means using Access or something else in that league.  We would all rather use awk.
Mysql copy the file local and import it then use phpmyadmin as a report writer.  If you already have a linux workstation it takes like 5 minutes to get lamp+phpmyadmin on it.  I guess it comes down to if you are trying to build a solution or just solve the current problem once.  If the latter you just grab the closest hammer you are familiar with, get it done and move on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 09, 2013, 08:54:30 AM
I might do that if I was the end user, but after some discussion the guy actually using the CSV seems fine doing it by what I consider the hard way.  This is actually a semi-completed project that I was working on before my promotion, and in reality I'm doing that account favors since the client isn't paying us for engineering services.  Now, if they get serious about creating some decent report, then I'll look at the mysql since that seems like the best idea.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on July 09, 2013, 09:35:31 PM
Probably the wrong place for it, but I have a large XML file that contains (among other things) two tags "title" and "url" (or something similar). Which, of course, are a bookmark title and URL.

I ONLY have this in an XML file (which is a backup of some favorites thing).

I need to scrape those two fields and write them out into something freakin' chrome can import, with the goal of eventually getting it into my stupid android phone. For reasons I am NOT sure of, my old Droid didn't sync my bookmarks (or it somehow got hosed -- everything else synced fine) so when I got my new phone, I've got squat for bookmarks.

The reason I have only the XML instead of the actual favorites/bookmarks from the old phone's browser is I never rooted my old phone, and for reasons that totally escape me, my old phone's browser (Opera, I think) decided NOT to store the bookmarks on the SD card (like I thought) but in a folder on the phone proper -- one that can only be seen if you have root.

Which I don't.

*grumble*. Any suggestions? Or am I pretty much just gonna have to write a quick scraper to yank these out and format them chrome bookmark style and drop it in the right spot on my new phone?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 10, 2013, 05:51:13 AM
Probably the wrong place for it, but I have a large XML file that contains (among other things) two tags "title" and "url" (or something similar). Which, of course, are a bookmark title and URL.

I ONLY have this in an XML file (which is a backup of some favorites thing).

I need to scrape those two fields and write them out into something freakin' chrome can import, with the goal of eventually getting it into my stupid android phone. For reasons I am NOT sure of, my old Droid didn't sync my bookmarks (or it somehow got hosed -- everything else synced fine) so when I got my new phone, I've got squat for bookmarks.

The reason I have only the XML instead of the actual favorites/bookmarks from the old phone's browser is I never rooted my old phone, and for reasons that totally escape me, my old phone's browser (Opera, I think) decided NOT to store the bookmarks on the SD card (like I thought) but in a folder on the phone proper -- one that can only be seen if you have root.

Which I don't.

*grumble*. Any suggestions? Or am I pretty much just gonna have to write a quick scraper to yank these out and format them chrome bookmark style and drop it in the right spot on my new phone?
Well you are in luck xpath + xslt is used to query data from an xml file...  Oh wait nm that isn't any easier than just scraping the file.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 10, 2013, 07:54:39 AM
It'll probably be easier to just navigate to the pages and re-bookmark them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 23, 2013, 02:06:28 PM
House got struck by lightning last night and apparently my surge protector didn't protect my computer.  Here's the problem: My computer won't start up using the start button.

- I used a paperclip to jump the power and ground on my power supply and the supply seems to be ok (fan spins, drives boot, etc.) 

Does this mean that I fried my mobo?  Is there an easy way to test if this is the case?  Could it be anything else?

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2013, 04:35:34 PM
Does it smell like you fried your motherboard?

Do you have another power supply you can test with?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 23, 2013, 04:47:02 PM
If you jump the power and ground with a paperclip, you can test the power supply.  It's fine.   It happened late last night and I didn't notice until after work.  Any smell would have been swept away by my AC while I was at work.

I'm just trying to whittle down my other possibilities. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2013, 05:03:47 PM
I would still try another power supply if you have one. The power supply puts out current on a bunch of different lines at a bunch of different voltages and may not be sending out enough current on, say, the main motherboard 12V power connector. Does your motherboard have any lights or a POST code display that light up when you try and power it on?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 23, 2013, 05:26:14 PM
When I jump the power supply fans work, the power supply fan spins, and CD & HDD spin.  Nothing from the mother board when I try too boot normally.  No lights, no fan, nothing.  I'm thinking that the power isn't being distributed by the mother board. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2013, 05:35:39 PM
If you pull out the main motherboard power connector does either end look damaged? How hard is to remove the motherboard from the case? It may be short circuiting against the case somehow now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 23, 2013, 07:52:08 PM
Worked flawlessly for 3 months.  I'm guessing something got fried on the Mobo.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on July 24, 2013, 08:49:36 AM
If the Mobo is fried most likely other things in your computer are fried also or partially damaged. I have repaired a few machines that got fried in this manner over the years and usually the best bet is to just replace it if you can afford it. You start replacing pieces of it and stuff keeps failing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 24, 2013, 10:20:21 AM
If the Mobo is fried most likely other things in your computer are fried also or partially damaged. I have repaired a few machines that got fried in this manner over the years and usually the best bet is to just replace it if you can afford it. You start replacing pieces of it and stuff keeps failing.

You may be right.  I ordered a new mobo this morning and will start there.  If the mobo fried then it's likely the memory fried as well.  I'll start with one thing at a time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 24, 2013, 12:12:21 PM
Then start with the power supply.  :-P

Just because it turns on when you jump it doesn't mean it's good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 24, 2013, 12:37:39 PM
Then start with the power supply.  :-P

Just because it turns on when you jump it doesn't mean it's good.

I think you missed it above.  When I bypass the mobo and jump it, everything gets power just fine.  I do have a backup power supply, but I'm about 99% sure it's not the issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on July 24, 2013, 04:14:11 PM
Word of warning you will probably want to test the new mobo and parts with the spare power supply first. I had one buddy that replaced his fried mobo and fried his new one because he did not replace the power supply.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on July 25, 2013, 04:42:37 AM
This makes me appreciate my job where I can just snag a card or motherboard or PSU out of the pile of stripped out spare parts and bring it home to test things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 25, 2013, 06:05:41 AM
There are places that will test your PSU for you for a small fee (I think it is like $12 at Fry's).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 25, 2013, 07:25:55 AM
There are places that will test your PSU for you for a small fee (I think it is like $12 at Fry's).

I'm fortunate enough to have an O-scope and multimeter in my lab and a bunch of bored electrical engineers 3 floors down.  If the mobo doesn't fix it, I may just go bug some of the senior students.  They love playing with this stuff. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on July 25, 2013, 07:29:09 PM
New mobo solved the problem.  Thanks to everyone for their suggestions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on July 27, 2013, 12:02:04 PM
If you jump the power and ground with a paperclip, you can test the power supply.  It's fine.   It happened late last night and I didn't notice until after work.  Any smell would have been swept away by my AC while I was at work.

I'm just trying to whittle down my other possibilities. 

That smell NEVER goes away...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on August 13, 2013, 02:10:10 PM
Anyone want to talk me out of the Razer Taipan? It was down to that and the SteelSeries Sensei so thoughts/experiences with either would be useful. The Razer is the devil I know, I have used them for years and don't have many bad things to say about them other than they are quite easy to break and I wish they came with more replacement feet. I had an Abyssus most recently and it was a great mouse.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on August 13, 2013, 08:09:01 PM
The Sensei is a solid workhorse. I've been gaming on mine (MLG edition) since I think December and it's help up well so far; my only problem with it is that with my grip and small hands, reaching the forward side button is impossible without shifting my whole hand forward. I had the exact same issue with my old Razer Diamondback (which I still use at work, but after years of service the LMB switch and the scroll wheel detents have become too flaky for gaming) though so if you're okay with the side buttons on your current Razer stuff the Sensei should be fine.

Oh, and the other issue, if you care about this sort of thing, is that the profiling software is clunky shit and it's pretty arbitrary which settings are kept on your PC and which are kept on the mouse, so the "keep your settings onboard and use them anywhere" schtick is only true if you care only about sensitivity settings and not button assignments, which screws me over a bit as an occasional left-handed mouser. From what I recall, though, Razer's software was equally shit (Diamondback had no onboard storage so no idea there).

I consider myself a SteelSeries convert but the products are so similar in design goals that it mostly just boils down to which aesthetics and frills you prefer. Honestly the most noticeable difference between the two (that isn't accounted for by comparing a newer top-of-the-line model to an outdated middle-of-the-road one) is that I slightly prefer the casing on the Sensei. I do miss the trademark grippy, rubbery Razer feel sometimes but the slick surface on the Sensei is so much tougher and easier to clean that I don't think I'd go back... unless I could confirm that my thumb could actually reach the buttons on the Naga Hex, then I'd be all over that. First people to send me a gaming-quality mouse with multiple thumb buttons I can actually reach has me as a customer for life. I really need to try one of those super-adjustable R.A.T. things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Quinton on August 14, 2013, 07:17:13 PM
Has anybody seen a three button mouse with three actual buttons?  Like the old Logitech wedge mice?

I would like a wheel, but I don't want the wheel to be the middle button -- the middle button should be no harder or awkward to press than the left or right buttons, and should not have any side-effects to pressing.

For CAD/modeling software, X11, games like DOTA2 where B2 is a camera control modifier, etc, I really really want an actual button.  Surely *somebody* makes a real three button mouse still?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 14, 2013, 07:39:42 PM
Has anybody seen a three button mouse with three actual buttons?  Like the old Logitech wedge mice?
There are plenty of mice with three or more buttons but none that I've found that have a button between the left and right buttons that's also not a scroll wheel.

Quote
I would like a wheel, but I don't want the wheel to be the middle button -- the middle button should be no harder or awkward to press than the left or right buttons, and should not have any side-effects to pressing.
I have the same issue as I use it for pasting having learned Unix on NeWS and X11 and pushing down on a scroll wheel usually causes things to scroll (as well as paste). What I do is use Logitech mice that have tilt scroll wheels and set the left and right tilts to be middle buttons (though I usually only tilt to the left). I've been using that setup for a long time now and it works very well for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Quinton on August 15, 2013, 03:22:27 AM
It looks like HP sells the DY651A which is a three-button optical USB mouse (no wheel).

These guys sell a fancy ergo three-button mouse with wheel and fw/bk rocker switch by the thumb:
http://ergo.contour-design.com/ergonomic-mouse/contour-mouse

Ordering one of each to check them out.

Alternatively, perhaps a gaming mouse with a thumb switch or two would be workable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: JWIV on August 16, 2013, 06:28:33 PM
I'm declaring victory here. I think. Jesus what a pain in the ass. Basically, I snagged an old system off my brother and decided to take the components and move it to a better case.  I blew out the case before doing so however, as it was completely filthy. Which somehow managed to short out the DIMM slots on the motherboard. At which point, I said "Welp, Wife gets a free upgrade now" as her system runs a compatible board. However, it required a BIOS update in order to support a quad core cpu.  No problem! Looked up the specs on the board, tried ASUS's graphical tool which completely fucked up the BIOS update and was unable to recover via their 'crash free BIOS' shit. 

That all said - one BIOS chip later (thank god they didn't solder them down on the P5 boards), the wife now has moved from 4gigs of RAM and Core 2 Duo to 8 gigs and a Core 2 Quad.

Lessons learned

1) I've never blown a mother board using canned air before, but it can happen. Have to keep that in mind.
2) Never ever ever ever NEVER update a BIOS from Windows. Go into BIOS and use their EZTool instead.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on August 16, 2013, 06:47:04 PM
1) I've never blown a mother board using canned air before, but it can happen. Have to keep that in mind.

Get one of these and the condensation from compressed air is a thing of the past. (http://www.amazon.com/Metro-Vacuum-ED500-500-Watt-Electric/dp/B001J4ZOAW)  Also, it's got a hell of a lot more power than a can can produce.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 19, 2013, 06:26:59 AM
An air compressor is one of the first tools I bought once I acquired a house, doesn't seem to have near as much condensation as air from a can and it never runs out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 19, 2013, 03:49:51 PM
An air compressor is one of the first tools I bought once I acquired a house, doesn't seem to have near as much condensation as air from a can and it never runs out.

Have to worry about oil with an air compressor though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on August 20, 2013, 06:08:44 PM
THIS  (http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.asp?Model=4Core1600Twins-P35) is my motherboard and it looks like I will finally be able to replace/upgrade my memory. Apparently 4 GB RAM are a real bottleneck performancewise, I have been checking the resource monitor in the last few days and whenever I run something more demanding than Chrome or Firefox, physical memory usage is at 100% with lots and lots and lots of HD activity.
Now, could someone please, for the love of god explain to me what kind of RAM and I can (and should) install in this ancient piece of technology ?

I can't make heads or tails out of this:

Quote
- Dual Channel DDR3/DDR2 memory technology*
- 2 x DDR3 DIMM slots
- Supports DDR3 1333/1066/800 non-ECC, un-buffered memory
- Max. capacity: 4GB**
- 4 x DDR2 DIMM slots
- Supports DDR2 1066/800/667 non-ECC, un-buffered memory
- Max. capacity: 16GB**

edit: I have a feeling I have asked this question before, when I upgraded my graphic card, but could not find that post.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on August 20, 2013, 07:16:10 PM
- 4 x DDR2 DIMM slots
- Supports DDR2 1066/800/667 non-ECC, un-buffered memory
- Max. capacity: 16GB**

This is the important part, you can't mix ddr2 and ddr3, so if you want to go past 4gb total memory, you'll need to get some ddr2. Either match what you have, or drop in a fresh new pair/quad. I'd suggest going with a pair of 4gb sticks, but due to being old, it'll cost nearly as much (~100€ per 4gb chip) as just upgrading your motherboard/chip/memory to something more modern.

TL;DR Old computer stuff costs too much to upgrade. Save your money and replace it soon.

Every time I type the Euro symbol, I'm amused that they picked Zoidberg as their currency symbol.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 21, 2013, 08:59:18 AM
Ya, looks like you have one of those hybrid memory P35 chipset boards that could take DDR2 and DDR3 ram. I'm using one at the moment, my old gaming machine at work! Unless you're economically constrained for the long term, I would recommend upgrading.

If you can't, then buy the ram. It SHOULD be as simple as buying DDR2 ram, two sticks of 4 GB, and bob's your uncle. However, be sure to read any documentation on the board to make sure there's no funkiness in changing. If memory serves there were some serious problems moving from DDR2 to DDR3 on some boards that were eventually sorted out through a BIOS flash.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on August 22, 2013, 08:11:29 AM
Ok, stuff got weird(ish). I managed to get 2 new 4 GB DDR2 667 sticks (IBM even).

When I opened my case I found that I had 2 1 GB DDR2 and 2 512 MB DDR2 installed. So I had only 3 GB of RAM instead of the 4 I always assumed. Looks like the RAM fairy sneaked into my appartment and installed some strange combination because I don't remember putting those in.

When I installed my new RAM (just the 2 new ones) my graphic card failed to send a signal. From the last time I had RAM problems (years ago) I thought I remembered that the BIOS is supposed to give warning sounds when it detects failed RAM when you start the computer.

Right now I am back to only using the 2 1 GB sticks and wonder if the ram is bad or if I did something wrong (I did NOT try to shove them in the DDR3 slots  :awesome_for_real: )

Also for some reason I have the weird feeling that at least windows performance is a bit improved, is that possible ?

edit: Forget the performance gain, I was seeing things , system slowed down to a crawl. I put the old RAM back in and it seems that I was seeing things earlier because now my BIOS and Windows tell me that I got two different sets of 2 X 1 GB RAM installed. I get the feeling that I might have been trying to install hardware that was not compatible with my system.

What I got now installed is:

2X Kingston PC2 6400 DDR2-80
2X Samsung PC2 6400 DDR2-80

1 set of RAM is about half the size of the other, specwise the difference seems to be (according to Sisoftware Sandra):
Technology: 8X(128MX8) and Standard timings: 5-6-6-18 3-24-6-3 (Samsung)
Technology: 16X(24MX8) and Standard timings: 5-5-5-18 3-23-6-3 (Kingston)

The RAM I got is supposed to be "IBM PC2-5300  8GB (DIMM 240, 667 MHz, 2x 4GB) DDR2-RAM"

Also I seem to have a maximum FSB of 400 and in my Bios it is set to 266 according to my motherboard manual I should run either 800, 1066 or 1333 Mhz FSB for 667Mhz RAM. Could this be the problem ?
I suppose here is some kind of multiplier at work ?






Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on August 22, 2013, 10:39:17 AM
Yay, my home PC has gone into a lovely nvlddmkm.sys blue screen crash loop.  Sometimes it'll even manage to make it all of the way to loading Windows before it poops out.  Apparently this is a common problem, so I'll try some of the solutions I've seen.  Fucking nvidia.

Somewhat related, my PC seems to freeze up every day or two.  It just straight locks.  No blue screen, but mouse/kb stops working and the clock stops advancing time.  No error in the logs at all that would indicate what's happening. Could this be a motherboard issue or RAM?  I'm a bit worried that with all of the work I had to do a year or two back to fix my video card issues (RMA'd) that somehow I damaged some of the board components.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: satael on August 22, 2013, 10:55:36 AM
Ok, stuff got weird(ish). I managed to get 2 new 4 GB DDR2 667 sticks (IBM even).

When I opened my case I found that I had 2 1 GB DDR2 and 2 512 MB DDR2 installed. So I had only 3 GB of RAM instead of the 4 I always assumed. Looks like the RAM fairy sneaked into my appartment and installed some strange combination because I don't remember putting those in.

When I installed my new RAM (just the 2 new ones) my graphic card failed to send a signal. From the last time I had RAM problems (years ago) I thought I remembered that the BIOS is supposed to give warning sounds when it detects failed RAM when you start the computer.

Right now I am back to only using the 2 1 GB sticks and wonder if the ram is bad or if I did something wrong (I did NOT try to shove them in the DDR3 slots  :awesome_for_real: )

Also for some reason I have the weird feeling that at least windows performance is a bit improved, is that possible ?
In theory if the 512mb sticks were slower than the 1gb sticks then your memory would run at the lowest common denominator. And if that had been set in BIOS manually it could explain why your new sticks (if they were of different speed) wouldn't work when you tried.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on August 22, 2013, 11:07:58 AM
In theory if the 512mb sticks were slower than the 1gb sticks then your memory would run at the lowest common denominator. And if that had been set in BIOS manually it could explain why your new sticks (if they were of different speed) wouldn't work when you tried.
Updated my previous post, apparently I was seeing things. RAM speed in the BIOS was set to AUTO last time I checked.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 22, 2013, 11:12:45 AM
Yay, my home PC has gone into a lovely nvlddmkm.sys blue screen crash loop.  Sometimes it'll even manage to make it all of the way to loading Windows before it poops out.  Apparently this is a common problem, so I'll try some of the solutions I've seen.  Fucking nvidia.

Somewhat related, my PC seems to freeze up every day or two.  It just straight locks.  No blue screen, but mouse/kb stops working and the clock stops advancing time.  No error in the logs at all that would indicate what's happening. Could this be a motherboard issue or RAM?  I'm a bit worried that with all of the work I had to do a year or two back to fix my video card issues (RMA'd) that somehow I damaged some of the board components.
What are the temps when it locks up?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on August 22, 2013, 11:15:34 AM
It'll lock at idle.  Maybe 40-50C.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 22, 2013, 02:39:05 PM
Anyone have experience with RAID using MLC SSD's on database and/or web servers?  My worry is the heavy write usage from website log files and database writes but  even though my budget doesn't allow for enterprise SLC drives I am thikning there is still some faster than mechanical and yet still stable configuration that can use high end MLC drives.  Serverwise I was thinking of going with a Dell Poweredge 720xd (24x 2.5" bays) with a PERC 710P RAID controller not sure how compatible that would be with aftermarket drives or even which drives to get or what RAID config to use.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 22, 2013, 02:52:27 PM
We use the Intel 320s (mostly 160s, some larger) on our MySQL boxes. We're not using RAID on those, though, and instead have master-master replication setup for handling failures. Why would you want to run your Web servers and put your Web logs on SSDs?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 22, 2013, 03:45:15 PM
Mostly because we are soon to be implementing a slow as fuck cms and my initial reaction is to throw hardware at it. 

edit - The site we are running probably isn't busy enough to justify a cluster.  I'm thinking single MS 2012 production server running 2 nodes (1 MS SQL Server and 1 IIS node) and loaded up with SSDs, then a second test server with mostly the same setup and no SSDs.  Not sure what exactly is causing the CMS slowness but the fastest implementation I have seen has been delivering the html document (just the text document no image or script includes) in 3.5 seconds and most of the sites I have seen are even slower than that, my guess is way too many queries but it could also be excessive analytics or logging.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 22, 2013, 07:47:08 PM
Is it an ASP.NET CMS?

If so, throwing disc speed at it probably won't speed it up after a certain point, you need to make sure all the rendered .NET pages stay in cache. We just moved to Sitefinity and we have another box that does a wget on all pages on the production/test sites every I think 10 minutes. With that, there is literally (after the initial loads of the page) zero difference in performance between a box with 4 cores and 16GB of RAM and a box with 2 cores and 8GB of RAM. Before we started running the wget script to keep it in the asp.net cache, pages that were not visited frequently would take up to 20 seconds to load. Now everything loads pretty much as one would expect for your general website.

When I watch the performance tab on the task manager on initial page loads, it pegs 2 cores for 15-20 seconds.

This is with the storage for both the IIS and the SQL guests on the 15k tier of our Compellent.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 23, 2013, 07:19:53 AM
Yeah Sitefinity is exactly the CMS I am moving to.

Now everything loads pretty much as one would expect for your general website.

My expectation is that you should be able to deliver a web page w/o relying on cache in under a second and a half.  Obviously that will never happen with Sitefinity, so is your wget script dynamically crawling the site or do you manually configure it with the pages you want it to hit?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 23, 2013, 09:06:24 AM
I have a love-hate relationship with Sitefinity. The site we did for one of our clients is one of the reasons behind one of their big patches two Christmases ago. It does some amazing things but the backend is fucking slow as shit most of the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 23, 2013, 09:15:04 AM
I'm going into it thinking of it as a rapid website development tool.  In a few months, after we have revamped and organized our hundreds of content pages, I'll probably migrate to something else.  The module builder is like 80% awesome and 20% wtf.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 23, 2013, 10:39:59 AM
It'll lock at idle.  Maybe 40-50C.
Try a different power supply.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 23, 2013, 03:46:49 PM
Yeah Sitefinity is exactly the CMS I am moving to.

Now everything loads pretty much as one would expect for your general website.

My expectation is that you should be able to deliver a web page w/o relying on cache in under a second and a half.  Obviously that will never happen with Sitefinity, so is your wget script dynamically crawling the site or do you manually configure it with the pages you want it to hit?

The cache stuff you can blame Microsoft for (from what I could tell from my reading into it a few months ago), asp.net code is just plain slow to run.

Our crawler just has the DNS names of the sites to crawl explicitly listed (we don't have many). It runs as a windows scheduled task on a box we have run a number of scripts. I can send you a snippet of the code if you want, it is all of like 10 lines.

Sitefinity, in my opinion after 8 months of trying to get it to do what they say it can do, is not worth the hassle. Any product that requires you to both make settings changes in the web gui and then go and make changes in the config files manually is clownshoes. And any product that requires you to actually write your own code pages to secure the backend (oh yeah, and you can't IP whitelist the backend because the master css files are stored in that directory...:mob: ), ugh.

And don't get me started on their "documentation", I have had to put in support tickets just to get them to explain to me how I am actually supposed to get something to work when I follow their instructions to the letter only to find "oh, you need to change this config file manually!".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 24, 2013, 08:51:06 AM
The .Net excuse is a cop out, both Ektron and Sitecore are plenty fast enough.  I agree that not being able to do the entire thing through the gui makes the gui just an extra PITA step to learn/go through but it isn't like every time you toss a new page up you need to go through that.  I hear the forums are halfway decent for muddling through stuff.  Have you done any VS development for Sitefinity yet (aka Sitethunder)?  I was really hoping to use Sitecore instead but having to tackle the learning curve on top of a major redesign of 2 largish websites had everyone scared there.  Hopefully once we get everything redone in Sitefinity we can revisit migrating to Sitecore.

edit - My gut feeling is that the speed issues in Sitefinity have more to do with them being forced to use the entire gambit of Telerik widgets and doodads (Kendo UI, Radcontrols, etc...) and that while these may be fine for writing web applications in .Net they aren't tuned very well to the extra burdens associated with creating a templating engine/cms.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 24, 2013, 08:57:50 AM
The .Net excuse is a cop out, both Ektron and Sitecore are plenty fast enough.  I agree that not being able to do the entire thing through the gui makes the gui just an extra PITA step to learn/go through but it isn't like every time you toss a new page up you need to go through that.  I hear the forums are halfway decent for muddling through stuff.  Have you done any VS development for Sitefinity yet (aka Sitethunder)?  I was really hoping to use Sitecore instead but having to tackle the learning curve on top of a major redesign of 2 largish websites had everyone scared there.  Hopefully once we get everything redone in Sitefinity we can revisit migrating to Sitecore.

I am strictly the infrastructure/server guy (I am not a programmer of any sort, tweaking scripts is about all I do). The "web developers" are the ones doing all of the other stuff and they are, well let's just say that using the term developer in their title is not very truthful.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on August 27, 2013, 10:34:39 PM
It'll lock at idle.  Maybe 40-50C.
Try a different power supply.


Don't have a spare with enough juice for the current vid card.  Anyhow, it started bugging out again.  Image would distort and then the system would freeze.  Tried reseating it, blowing out dust.  Computer wouldn't even boot anymore. 

This fucking card.  It never sat right in the slot and the previous one had a fan die on it.  This is the RMA'd one. There's so much crap hanging off it, it wiggles its way out of the slot and does this from time to time. However, I'm afraid it's past the point of no return now.  I don't think I can even RMA it anymore, as it's been a while.

Put the 8800gt in.  At this point I think I'm going to have to start replacing a number of parts.  Vid card first, I suppose.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on August 28, 2013, 12:03:24 PM
Anyone have any tips on a free IIS log interpreter that we can use in an enterprise environment?  We have a rogue project we're trying to keep under wraps until the right time. 

Like this, but free.  (I know, I know.)  :awesome_for_real:

http://www.lizard-labs.net/log_parser_lizard.aspx


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 28, 2013, 12:47:13 PM
Maybe Awstats + ActiveState Perl?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 28, 2013, 01:04:28 PM
Painful to set up but it is probably the best you are going to get for free.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on August 28, 2013, 01:21:58 PM
Thanks much!  I'll run it through the team and see what's what.  Much appreciated!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 30, 2013, 05:20:28 AM
Those awful pictures that slide down your screen to stay in the same position as you scroll are getting more and more obnoxiously common.  Is there something I can do maybe with a Firefox addon that'll get rid of these things?  I'd so far as to change browsers if I have to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Pennilenko on August 30, 2013, 06:20:31 AM
Those awful pictures that slide down your screen to stay in the same position as you scroll are getting more and more obnoxiously common.  Is there something I can do maybe with a Firefox addon that'll get rid of these things?  I'd so far as to change browsers if I have to.

I use Adblock plus, combined with Ghostery, and BetterPrivacy.. I never see those pictures you speak of.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on August 30, 2013, 07:07:12 AM
I use "Element Hiding Helper" that integrates itself with adblock.  Then you can open up adblock and an option to hide elements will be there.  I have wound up hiding so many annoying things that I think it is making firefox slow down though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 30, 2013, 07:19:17 AM
noscript and just don't whitelist any add providers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 30, 2013, 07:50:23 AM
Noscript!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 30, 2013, 12:27:11 PM
Sigh. I used to run NoScript but it got annoying looking at its alarms on every single page I went to.  Oh well, maybe its gotten better in the last couple of years.

edit: Oh! and thanks all for the answers to my question.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 30, 2013, 12:31:43 PM
Just turn off the alerts.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on August 30, 2013, 01:15:19 PM
OK it's installed and the alerts are turned off but when I go to salon.com I still see the obnoxious little search/facebook/twitter buttons that are permanently at the top of the page even if I try to scroll away.  Is there something I need to do to them to block them?  I tried rightclicking on them but nothing seemed obvious to do.

edit: I figured it out.  I added the extension to Adblock Plus that disables social media buttons and that seemed to do it.  I'll have to mess around a little to see if it's blocking more or less than what I want.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on August 31, 2013, 09:16:11 PM
My internet connection's been a bit flakey lately -- (ATT u-verse). Seems like every weeked I start getting more and more packet loss until the dang thing just decides it can't even resolve hosts, and then I reboot the stupid router/box/gateway/whatever and then it works.

Which, okay, I can live with.

The think that just really irritates me is Windows 7. I reboot the router, the router comes back up and EVERY device in the household (phones, Xbox, iPads, etc) all find the wifi, reconnect, and go on with life.

Except Windows 7 on my PC. Which takes another five minutes or so before it FINALLY sees the network is back up and can reconnect. I cannot for the life of me figure out why.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 01, 2013, 06:57:42 AM
My internet connection's been a bit flakey lately -- (ATT u-verse). Seems like every weeked I start getting more and more packet loss until the dang thing just decides it can't even resolve hosts, and then I reboot the stupid router/box/gateway/whatever and then it works.

Which, okay, I can live with.

The think that just really irritates me is Windows 7. I reboot the router, the router comes back up and EVERY device in the household (phones, Xbox, iPads, etc) all find the wifi, reconnect, and go on with life.

Except Windows 7 on my PC. Which takes another five minutes or so before it FINALLY sees the network is back up and can reconnect. I cannot for the life of me figure out why.

You probably should check and see if it has multiple cached networks and delete them (Merge and delete network locations). That shit will cause all kinds of funkytown stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 10, 2013, 11:48:46 AM
So doing a small bit of reading and revisiting my earlier idea that there should be some way to increase the number of IP addresses available on the work network without modifying immediately modifying the subnet mask of every single device.  

Given the following IPv4 info:

Address: 172.16.1.10
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 172.16.1.2

If I take the above and plug it into this subnet calculator I found:
http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/SubnetCalculator.jsp?ipAddress=172.16.1.10&cidr=24

Could I change this /24 subnet to a /23 and double my available addresses by just modifying the subnet on the gateway and any new clients?  My half assed logic here is that changing it to a /23 does not modify the Broadcast Address of 172.16.1.255...  I realized 172.16.1.xxx stuff that is still configured for the /24 subnet wont see things on 172.16.0.xxx but what if I am just dropping in a stand alone lamp server or something that doesn't need to interact with the rest of the network (other than the gateway)?  Long term goal would be to update the subnet masks for every device to 255.255.254.0 but in the mean time would it be likely to break anything by just updating the gateway?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 10, 2013, 02:13:34 PM
My computer is currently a Q9450 with a 4800 series Radeon and 4GB of RAM.

What is the most likely culprit for games locking up, dropping out, and reloading. I suspect it's that I simply don't have enough RAM to load the game into memory properly. I'd like it to not be my GPU or Processor, so that's basically wishful thinking.

Edit: Firefox, Trilian, and Steam are running on bootup (oh, and everything.exe). It uses up 2.4GB of my 4GB total. Comeon be a memory issue!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on September 10, 2013, 02:23:48 PM
You could be running into swapping with that much used already but I don't know that it would be a cause of lockups. My gut says video card. 64 bit OS?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 10, 2013, 02:26:58 PM
Win7 64. I believe it's a graphics swapping issue. It's not a hard lock. it like dumps video memory and reloads the games. Runs fine for 5-30 minutes depending on the game and does it again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 10, 2013, 02:28:19 PM
When looking for what isn't working: always bet on ATi.
(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/85916/passenger57-snipes.jpg)

Also W7 with 4GB RAM is awful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on September 10, 2013, 02:34:36 PM
That is a classic ATI graphics driver crash it sounds like to me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 10, 2013, 02:42:12 PM
Should I roll back from the newest drivers to a specific one or install the beta ones? Also, sounds like I should buy a bucket of ram.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on September 10, 2013, 08:16:50 PM
I agree I would try rolling back from the newest drivers first. I generally stay far away from the bleeding edge of the ATI drivers historically I have had nothing but issues. As far as ram goes its a cheap upgrade so why not?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: K9 on September 11, 2013, 07:22:04 AM
I have a printers question.

My mother wants a new printer, and although I have tried to convince her that for the amount of stuff she needs to print she'd be better off using the printer at the local library, she's set on having one at home. My inclination is that a monochrome laserjet should offer the cheapest solution in the long run, given that she prints maybe 1-2 pages per week, and it's almost always text (nothing that requires colour).

Does this seem right, or would an inkjet/bubblejet be a better option? It seems that ink is horribly expensive, and might not last well given how infrequently she prints.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 11, 2013, 07:30:09 AM
I would recommend a laser printer, a good-ish one. Mostly because inkjets suck and cheap printers turn into doorstops after 6 months.  Something like this: http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=19&l=en&sku=225-4114

I have a middle of the road Dell home office color laser printer - works great, always picks up the paper, never smears. Had to replace the black & color cartridges once in 4 years, and that was with me printing a lot for school.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 08:49:04 AM
I realized I didn't even know what RAM was in my machine. I have an ASUS P5KC and I'm running 4GB of DDR2 800 whereas my mobo can also take DDR3 1333.

I'm a fucking idiot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on September 11, 2013, 09:39:57 AM
Laser is a good choice for a simple printer. At the volume she is talking about most likely the cartridges would go bad on a inkjet before they ran out. I would probably recommend one of the small office versions and just monochrome rather than color. You get a decent sized cartridge for a relatively cheap price and at the volume you are talking about the one cartridge would probably last 10 years :).

And schild looks like you can only put 8 GB in that board so you are out maybe 80 bucks shipped for decent ram. I would still downgrade your video drivers though I noticed the newest ones crashed a few games for me.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 09:47:56 AM
I'm trying to dig around for the most stable drivers for the 4890. No good answers that are less than a year or two old. Bleh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 01:10:16 PM
Guess I'll swing up to Fry's today and pick up some more DDR2-800. Hope they have 4 year old Corsair memory.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 11, 2013, 03:50:57 PM
I have a printers question.

My mother wants a new printer, and although I have tried to convince her that for the amount of stuff she needs to print she'd be better off using the printer at the local library, she's set on having one at home. My inclination is that a monochrome laserjet should offer the cheapest solution in the long run, given that she prints maybe 1-2 pages per week, and it's almost always text (nothing that requires colour).

Does this seem right, or would an inkjet/bubblejet be a better option? It seems that ink is horribly expensive, and might not last well given how infrequently she prints.

The brother small laser printers are great for the price. I bought one for like 55 bucks a couple years ago and it works good for the rare occasions I need to print something.

I have an HL-2230 which is the monochrome USB only version of their basic printer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 08:31:27 PM
Put 4 more gigs in of the same type of ram. Graphics card aint outputting anything wtf halp


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 11, 2013, 08:35:42 PM
Do you see your startup BIOS stuff? If so can you boot into Safe Mode? If you don't see any startup BIOS output take the new memory out :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 08:38:05 PM
Could not see the BIOS stuff. Actually took the OLD memory out and left the new stuff in and it booted like nothing had changed. :???:

I didn't click to go into BIOS setup to see if I had disabled the 2nd RAM slot, but why would i do that, that's goofy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 08:41:06 PM
I just went into CPU-Z. Maybe I did fuck something up. This mobo has 6 slots for RAM but is only seeing 4 of the slots.

Granted 2 of the slots are for DDR3. So maybe it's only recognizing the DDR2 slots. I don't fucking know. Goddamn computers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 08:42:20 PM
I'm gonna try rebooting with memory just in the 2nd and 4th slot and see what happens.

TRIAL AND ERROR WHOOOO


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 11, 2013, 08:54:04 PM
Goddamn computers.

Fucking-A


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 09:05:30 PM
There's no reason this shouldn't be working. I'm just going to return it and get 2x4GB chips instead of 4x 2GB chips. Just, ugh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2013, 09:06:16 PM
Anyone have 8GB (2x 4GB matching sticks) lying around since everyone has moved from DDR2 to DDR3 except for me? =D


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 08:47:10 AM
I can not find a fucking concensus of any sort for the most recent & most stable radeon drivers on the goddamn internet. If I wanted an answer from 2002 though, that's readily available.  :mob: :tantrum:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 12, 2013, 09:09:06 AM
There aren't any stable Radeon drivers, that I know of.  Also I believe it's called Catalyst now?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 10:09:33 AM
I thought Catalyst was the control center and drivers were still just drivers. I don't know "or care" hurrrr.

Ok, here's a better question then.

What is the best & most cost-effective graphics card I can find for this mobo: http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/P5KC/

Edit: Should probably include my power supply, which is a uhhh, Zalman ZM-600HP: http://www.zalman.com/eng/product/Product_Read.php?Idx=633

Edit 2: Bonus points if they carry it at Fry's and I can get it while I return this RAM.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 12, 2013, 10:37:26 AM
http://www.frys.com/product/7311574?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 12, 2013, 11:23:50 AM
My point was that you might find more info if you use "catalyst" instead of "radeon".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on September 12, 2013, 12:00:33 PM
Strange motherboard, I am reading that it will only take 4GB of DDR3 ram total. But it will take 8 GB of DDR2 ram. There was talk of a BIOS upgrade but since ASUS site is shitting the bed here at work I cannot look it up for you.

For the video card I would try the 12.X series of drivers. When windows 8 came out they pushed a ton of crap out pretty quickly and switching to something earlier might be the solution. Since this is considered a "mature" product you will probably not see many bug fixes in the future to resolve the problems you are seeing. So maybe a newer card makes sense. Shrug. Trippy linked a decent card that should work fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 12:17:57 PM
At frys now. Simply buying the nvidia 660.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 12, 2013, 01:15:54 PM
You probably should have just put that on your registry.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 01:19:23 PM
Naw, that's ghetto.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 02:11:55 PM
Finishing part of the install that failed (PhysX unload/reload) but things seem to be going well. Also, this thing is a lot quieter than the 4890 beast and sucks up less power. So, yayyyyyyyy. Oh, and for whatever reason the NVidia shit takes up about 200mb less RAM, so that's a plus. I idle at 2.0-2.2 now instead of 2.2-2.4GB used on boot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 02:21:19 PM
Launching a game. Let's see what breaks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 03:03:07 PM
Graphics card solved my problems. RAM is more stable, after full install and cleanout of other shit, I'm down to 1.8GB used at idle. Games aren't stuttering anymore. YAYAYYYYYYY IT'S LIKE A NEW PC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on September 12, 2013, 03:06:49 PM
Flip dem cards. Scare yo self.

Glad you got it fixed.  I went for the nuclear option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 03:39:35 PM
I will next year probably.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2013, 08:07:07 PM
Was able to play Dishonored, among other things, on max settings for all the things.

Felt good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on September 13, 2013, 07:45:26 AM
If you haven't done it, track down the ati removal tool to make sure all the crap is cleaned out. Sometimes the catalyst un-installer doesn't get it all, particularly if you're switching companies.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 13, 2013, 07:49:46 AM
I just manually did it and freed up another 6GB of space. ATI really likes just keeping shit around on a computer. Backups of every driver package I ever installed. Bleh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ragnoros on September 14, 2013, 10:51:01 AM
To be fair, I just cleaned out 2GB of old Nvidia drivers the other day as well.

Anyway, I just bought a SSD to replace my grinding, ten year old HDD. Is there anything pertinent I should know for setup/general use specific to SSDs?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 14, 2013, 11:20:50 AM
To be fair, I just cleaned out 2GB of old Nvidia drivers the other day as well.

Anyway, I just bought a SSD to replace my grinding, ten year old HDD. Is there anything pertinent I should know for setup/general use specific to SSDs?

Never defrag (windows shouldn't even allow you to if it properly detects it as an SSD), turn off search indexing on the SSD, make sure AHCI mode is turned on on your motherboard, if you can do a clean install on the SSD do so.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 15, 2013, 03:39:08 PM
To be fair, I just cleaned out 2GB of old Nvidia drivers the other day as well.

Anyway, I just bought a SSD to replace my grinding, ten year old HDD. Is there anything pertinent I should know for setup/general use specific to SSDs?

I did a clean Windows install on my SSD then moved the Users folder to a non-SSD drive (this has My Pictures, My Documents, My Music, etc in it). PITA, but probably worth it since most of my editing is done in those folders - including Dropbox syncs.

Probably would have moved Program Files too, but that's a big mess I didn't want to deal with. So far my 120GB SSD is enough for Windows and my installed programs, with games installed on my 1TB RAID array (Users is here too).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 15, 2013, 06:52:35 PM
And ayup, all my computer issues are gone. Yay cureall fix.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 16, 2013, 01:30:36 PM
I think checking for firmware updates on any SSD might still be a great idea.  It was definitely a great idea two or three years ago.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 24, 2013, 11:38:38 PM
7" tablets, discuss.

We bought a fire for my kid two years ago and returned it because it just didn't have solid parental controls.  Now she's 8 and my folks want to buy her a tablet so she can Skype/Netflix and a few games on it.  Thoughts on the different models?  The $200 price point is fairly compelling to us.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 24, 2013, 11:43:57 PM
Dunno about the parental controls but there's a Nexus 7 model that's $199.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 25, 2013, 07:07:45 AM
I have a rev 2 nexus on the way ask me again in a week.  IIRC I saw some other higher end Asus tablet coming out soon that had a micro SD slot!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on September 25, 2013, 04:49:18 PM
7" tablets, discuss.

We bought a fire for my kid two years ago and returned it because it just didn't have solid parental controls.  Now she's 8 and my folks want to buy her a tablet so she can Skype/Netflix and a few games on it.  Thoughts on the different models?  The $200 price point is fairly compelling to us.

Sold my G1 Nexus 7 for the G2 model.  Build quality and speakers are both much better than the first gen model and the screen is gorgeous.  Outstanding little widget.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Raknor on September 30, 2013, 10:22:30 AM
I know this is the "build a PC" thread. But does anyone have any recommendations on a wireless router around $100? Ours seems to be having issues since the last electrical storm. I don't mind spending a little more if I can future proof myself a bit.

Looking for gigabit wired ports (4) and connecting 6 apple devices to the wireless. We stream a fair amount of netflix movies/shows. Our condo isn't huge so I don't need a ton of range. 

I hate shopping for routers. Half the reviews are glowing and the other half seem to label them as complete junk.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 30, 2013, 10:34:20 AM
Well your budget makes it hard to recommend something since I wouldn't recommend anything that wasn't at least dual-band 802.11ac capable and those are more expensive. The TRENDnet TEW-800MB AC1200 has those features plus 4 Gigabit Ethernet ports for $99 at Newegg but I have no idea how good it is.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 30, 2013, 01:28:40 PM
With so much apple going on you might consider an AirPort Extreme (http://www.apple.com/airport-extreme/) although it is double you stated budget.  I wonder how well the beam forming works with 6 devices connected simultaneously. 

I too would opt for something that supports wireless ac, unfortunately this is at odds with my mantra of don't spend more than $100 on a wifi router as all the consumer grade ones seem to melt themselves to death within 2 years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Shannow on October 08, 2013, 07:20:12 AM
Hated the idea of opening a thread so I'll ask here. Anyone have any contacts or tips on getting to someone useful inside of EA customer service?

Further proof that Origin is the tool of the devil: While setting up my son's Xbox account for FIFA 14 Ultimate team to be linked to the web app and mobile app I had to create an origin ID for him...once we linked the accounts EA decided it would then reset my son's FUT accounts...effectively zeroing them out (on both FIFA 13 and 14 actually) This meant removing all cards, players etc and resetting him back to level 0. As you can imagine after he just dumped 75 bucks into buying packs on FUT he is rather...distraught (actually imagine the wrath of a 13 year old...it's kinda scary really).....Traditional methods of opening a ticket through the website seem to be about as useless as tits on a bull so I thought I would ask here.
Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on October 08, 2013, 10:06:56 AM
Hated the idea of opening a thread so I'll ask here. Anyone have any contacts or tips on getting to someone useful inside of EA customer service?

Good luck - I'd be surprised if such a thing exists.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on October 23, 2013, 07:14:44 PM
Set top box advice?

Have an early Roku and considering a Roku3, but primarily we'd like something that will include YouTube along with Amazon, Hulu, Netflix etc. and also allow for offline storage (so we can stream videos from it).  Does not need to be a DVR.  Thanks Friends!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 24, 2013, 05:20:29 AM
Roku is probably the best box for the commercial streams you mentioned. If you are looking for streamable offline storage why not buy something like a Synology and then have the Roku connect to it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on November 10, 2013, 10:19:08 AM
Has chrome shat the bed lately or something ? I actually liked it very much until a few days a go strange things started to happen. I keep getting "This Webpage has a Redirect Loop" errors, youtube, gmail, facebook and chrome are having issues staying logged in and every once in a while I can only access the main page of a website. Clicking on any podcasts on stuffyoushouldknow.com would redirect me to www.stuffyoushouldknow.com. If I copy/paste the same link from chrome into firefox it works like a charm.

What the fuck google ? Interestingly enough, if I search for solutions to this problems, the links I can click all get the redirect loop error. Haelp!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on November 10, 2013, 11:04:46 AM
Some sort of addon that is screwing up after chrome auto updated itself maybe?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on November 10, 2013, 12:38:03 PM
I found some task bar software and some anti-phising software from panda media installed when I checked under "programs and features" (I hate windows 8 btw). the name of the anti-phishing software appeared in the url of some of the strange redirects I had been seeing.

Time to change my passwords, I guess ?  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on November 10, 2013, 01:13:22 PM
Never heard of that, depends on if these panda people are legit or not I guess.  One way to prevent phising would be to change all links to first go to their site to check whether or not they are valid and if so redirect.  Cure sounds kinda worse than disease though, I wouldn't use something like that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 11, 2013, 05:16:45 AM
Pando media shit is usually tied to their "media accelerator" or whatever they call it. It is used as the downloader for a number of games that have launchers/downloaders (I think LotRO was the last game I installed that had it?). It is usually games that you download a small 5MB or so "installer" that all it does is install the Pando stuff and then kick off a download of the actual game/content.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 11, 2013, 06:51:39 AM
Yeah, Pando is pretty much a craptastic torrent client for ftp games, which floods your connection randomly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 11, 2013, 01:33:40 PM
Soooo, I'm finally going to be upgrading my phone after many many years. While part of me wants to get another cheapie flip-phone out of spite for all the folks who are just constantly glued to their stupid phones, I don't think it's going to happen.

SO, what I'm looking for is:

What sorts of opinions do folks have of the Android phones offered by Verizon (my legacy plan is with them)? I would very much not like to get an iPhone, just because everyone and their mother has one it seems. Also, do the non-iPhones offered by Verizon generally have the capacity to accept other sim cards? This is a big deal, as I;m only in the US for another 7 months or so before heading off to Mexico, and I'd rather not have to buy Another phone to use there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 11, 2013, 02:01:48 PM
Get a Nexus 5. Oh wait that doesn't support Verizon :awesome_for_real: :oh_i_see:

I believe all of Verizon's LTE smartphones also include GSM sim slots for international use but you would be stuck with a 2 year contract on those (unless you cough up the extra money). Their prepaid phones (with no contracts) are really sucky.

Shopping for a phone that you plan on using internationally gets even more complicated cause the 3G/LTE data bands that are used in other countries typically differ from the ones used here in the US so if you wanted the fastest data speeds in Mexico you would need to choose your phone carefully.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 11, 2013, 06:41:39 PM
The 2-year contract doesn't actually bother me, as I still share the account with family.

Anyway, if I want to be sure that I'll get full functionality from my phone in Mexico, what do I need to be looking at?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 11, 2013, 09:00:42 PM
According to the Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LTE_networks#Americas) if you want LTE support in Mexico you need something that supports LTE band 4 (aka AWS-1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Wireless_Services)). The US GSM carriers (AT&T, T-Mobile) use that band for their LTE phones and Verizon has just started supporting it though Verizon phone support is spotty since the service is only apparently available in NYC right now. The Verizon Galaxy S4 supposedly now supports band 4 (http://www.droid-life.com/2013/10/28/verizon-galaxy-s4-android-4-3-update-is-build-vruemj7-includes-gear-support-and-actives-lte-band-4/) with its Android 4.3 update.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Shannow on November 26, 2013, 01:01:39 PM
Hated the idea of opening a thread so I'll ask here. Anyone have any contacts or tips on getting to someone useful inside of EA customer service?

Good luck - I'd be surprised if such a thing exists.

Well it only took 7 weeks but EA finally fixed the problem..:P Their 'game advisers' are actually easy to contact and quite nice (especially the Irish dudes) the problem is they are completely unable to help you and have to escalate everything up to the black hole that is the 'studio'.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on November 27, 2013, 07:55:36 AM
I'm tired of fan noise and want to take the plunge (har har) into liquid cooling. Which is completely unnecessary for my modest setup where higher-quality silent fans would probably do the trick, but I want to learn something new and I don't have much else to splurge on on Black Friday. Anything I should know beforehand that Google won't tell me? Brands to avoid?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on November 27, 2013, 08:04:47 AM
Any advice people would offer probably involves "don't do that" :awesome_for_real:.  Most liquid cooling still uses fans, to cool the liquid, then you also get water pump noise.  I don't think people do it for silence, they do it so they can overclock more than is possible with just fans.

Which fans are causing the noise?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on November 27, 2013, 12:42:51 PM
That is probably good advice. I think it's the CPU fan that's the worst, so probably a decent aftermarket solution would be a more practical and less exciting course of action.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 27, 2013, 04:53:34 PM
Disable all fans. Dip the whole computer in a vat of mineral oil. Problem solved (sorta ).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 29, 2013, 11:13:21 AM
Soooo, friend offering me a new iPad Air 32gb for $500 - worth it?

I'm not even sure what I would do with it since I have my PC and laptop, but if it's an actual good deal I'm sure I could find something to do.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 29, 2013, 12:27:02 PM
If that's a WiFi model (no cellular data option) that's just $100 off retail price. Apple is also having a Black Friday sale today with a free $75 gift card with iPad Air purchases so you are really only saving $25 assuming you made the deal today.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 30, 2013, 04:52:27 AM
My GTX 660 Ti OC has now taken to crashing the driver every 2 minutes.

Anyone had any useful experience of this ?  So many theories on the internet, Power Management being the main finger pointed.

I'm going to reformat this whole fucking thing today to see if it helps, but I'm tearing my hair out here. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 30, 2013, 08:36:42 AM
Did you install a new driver recently? I would do a custom / clean install of some WHQL drivers before reformatting. Is the fan working?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 30, 2013, 10:47:38 AM
Aye, when the driver crashes, fan drops to zero, but I can set it to 100% and watch them buzzing away. The temps on the card are fine (barely above freezing for fucks sake), so I hve no idea what's going on.

Johnny Internet says this is hugely common, but all of them reccomend different drivers that 'work for them'.

I've cleaned it oot - it was a good suggestion I was already in the process of - and it's a little more stable, but some of the games handle the driver crashing and some just die.

I'm too old for this shit.
 

On a related note, you should get paid for these threads.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on December 04, 2013, 01:57:04 PM
According to the Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LTE_networks#Americas) if you want LTE support in Mexico you need something that supports LTE band 4 (aka AWS-1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Wireless_Services)). The US GSM carriers (AT&T, T-Mobile) use that band for their LTE phones and Verizon has just started supporting it though Verizon phone support is spotty since the service is only apparently available in NYC right now. The Verizon Galaxy S4 supposedly now supports band 4 (http://www.droid-life.com/2013/10/28/verizon-galaxy-s4-android-4-3-update-is-build-vruemj7-includes-gear-support-and-actives-lte-band-4/) with its Android 4.3 update.


Thanks again, buddy - just picked one up and it seems very fancy so far. It's going to take some time to start typing things efficiently and really making proper use of the phone. Even if it is complete overkill for my purposes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on December 07, 2013, 06:29:48 AM
Computer's been running fine for awhile. But around October it would fail to start up once every 5-10 times. The fans would turn on, but I don't think the boot chime happens, and then it just hangs. Usually a complete shut down or two after that would make it load completely. But I don't consider that a fix :-)

At first I thought maybe the HD, but tests of that and then the RAM both came back normal. I haven't made any changes to the BIOS ever (it's not OC'd), and the only software I've installed is the usual Windows updates and Black Flag.

This problem isn't consistent, so it's hard to tell where the failure is (occasionally) happening.

I'm thinking PSU maybe? There a good way to test that beyond looking at voltages in Speccy?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on December 07, 2013, 09:53:02 AM
Sounds similar to something I was experiencing in Benin (and I don't think it's happened yet since my PC arrived).

I'm inclined to think it was a power issue for me, though I doubt that's the problem in your case.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 07, 2013, 10:29:38 AM
Computer's been running fine for awhile. But around October it would fail to start up once every 5-10 times. The fans would turn on, but I don't think the boot chime happens, and then it just hangs. Usually a complete shut down or two after that would make it load completely. But I don't consider that a fix :-)

At first I thought maybe the HD, but tests of that and then the RAM both came back normal. I haven't made any changes to the BIOS ever (it's not OC'd), and the only software I've installed is the usual Windows updates and Black Flag.

This problem isn't consistent, so it's hard to tell where the failure is (occasionally) happening.

I'm thinking PSU maybe? There a good way to test that beyond looking at voltages in Speccy?
Plug the computer into a different outlet. Unplug some stuff (extra hard drives, DVD drives, etc.).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on December 07, 2013, 12:20:39 PM
Sheesh, I shoulda thought of that. Thanks Trippy. That's my next step.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 07, 2013, 02:19:49 PM
Also make sure to use a different power strip (and even a different power cord if you want to be super paranoid).

We had an older server which was running our control system server for the power plant showing a power supply failure that would not clear even after we replaced the PSU which we assumed had a failure on the motherboard connection. When we upgraded and retired the box, when I went to move a different machine to that rack/slot and reused the power cord I got a PSU failure. Ended up that the power cord was bad, when I grabbed a different cord it worked fine (and the power cord was not super old either).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on December 07, 2013, 06:12:25 PM
Good point. Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 12, 2013, 02:09:01 PM
My computer is regressing significantly in gaming ability. It's performing terribly at games it used to display perfectly well.

I dunno what to do about it. I'm poking around with drivers and testing it on 3Dmark and wondering what went wrong. What's the first thing I should do when trying to isolate the cause of my computer's decline?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 12, 2013, 02:15:27 PM
Describe the performance issues you have having now.

What's your computer spec?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 12, 2013, 02:26:14 PM
low framerate, seemingly unimpacted by setting games down to low settings. Stuttering. Both in games and in video playback. Games it used to play just fine (MWO, SWTOR, etc) now have low framerates that crash down to slideshow levels in many situations.

Win 7 64 bit
Intel core 15-2500k CPU @ 3.30ghz (4 cpu's) ~3.3GHz
8192mb ram
page file 2876mb used 13470mb available

graphics card is amd radeon HD 6800 series

may be some driver issues somewhere; the previous administrator user account on the computer got hosed and I had to essentially start from scratch in the drivers dept.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 12, 2013, 02:32:57 PM
I would turn off your page file temporarily. Is everything running off of a hard drive? If so what's the SMART status on it? Do you have another drive you can move some games to? Are the games on the same drive as the OS and page file?

For the video drivers I would try and do a clean install (i.e. deleting the existing drivers first).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 12, 2013, 03:22:58 PM
alright, I disabled the page file, did a test on the disk and (as far as I am reading it) it's OK across the board. I'll test a game and then try the deletion and reinstallation of the video drivers ..


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 12, 2013, 06:39:23 PM
Seems fishy to page out 2.5GB when you have 8GB RAM.

Question: is there a tool that can create a bootable recovery ISO of a running RHEL server?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 12, 2013, 07:00:15 PM
If you burn the RHEL LiveCD/DVD of the release you are on to a disk it'll have a recovery mode.

If you are trying to burn an ISO of what's on the server right now you'll want something like Linux Live Kit (http://www.linux-live.org/). Not sure if Linux Live Kit will install the rescue mode that's part of the RHEL boot disc, though.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 13, 2013, 07:55:30 AM
I know I don't know linux words for things, but this sounds unnecessarily complex.  I want to run a OS backup of a running RHEL server and I want that backup image to be bootable such that I can use it to install a clone of that system.  Via Ignite or Kickstart or whatever RHEL uses for network installation, which I believe supports ISO images.  Ideally this will never be needed, but if alt-boot fails then no one wants to fuck around with a traditional reinstall.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 13, 2013, 11:43:08 AM
After page file / deleting and replacing drivers: the game seems to present greater stability in Huttball tests in SWTOR but framerates remain conspicuously low and games get skippy a lot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 13, 2013, 11:49:53 AM
Is it choppy on a consistent basis or does it come and go? E.g. is it choppy as you move into a new area but then it's okay until you move into another new area?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on December 13, 2013, 12:25:39 PM
My take is that when it gets to the point that you're noticing it, it's always faster to reinstall windows than to find the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 13, 2013, 12:52:02 PM
I know I don't know linux words for things, but this sounds unnecessarily complex.  I want to run a OS backup of a running RHEL server and I want that backup image to be bootable such that I can use it to install a clone of that system.  Via Ignite or Kickstart or whatever RHEL uses for network installation, which I believe supports ISO images.  Ideally this will never be needed, but if alt-boot fails then no one wants to fuck around with a traditional reinstall.
Kickstart won't do what you want. Kickstart is the way to automate the standard RH installation process which installs everything from packages (RPMs). In other words the Kickstart config "answers" all the questions you would normally answer manually when installing RH and runs through the standard installation procedure. You can create custom repos for Kickstart to pull packages from but that's different than cloning a system or just copying the already installed files.

You probably want something like Clonezilla (http://www.clonezilla.org/) which will clone a drive/partition onto a bootable disk and then allow you to clone that image back onto another machine. There's also a server edition that allows you to do this over a network if you need to create multiple clones at once.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 13, 2013, 01:55:36 PM
It would be for system recovery, but I'll look at Clonezilla.  Typically a system build is a planned event and we don't care very much how long it takes, but when a server goes POOF we would like to get it online again ASAP.

AIX does this very easily, I just can't correlate mksysb to anything on linux.

EDIT: It must be because linux wasn't around in the tape-backup era, otherwise I assume these tools would exist.  OH WELL.  I'll keep looking around.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 13, 2013, 05:14:31 PM
My take is that when it gets to the point that you're noticing it, it's always faster to reinstall windows than to find the problem.

I think that may be the route i have to take. I just don't have my windows 7 registration info anymore and argh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 13, 2013, 05:16:49 PM
I built myself a new gaming computer when I ran into that problem :awesome_for_real: :oh_i_see:



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on December 13, 2013, 07:22:12 PM
It would be for system recovery, but I'll look at Clonezilla.  Typically a system build is a planned event and we don't care very much how long it takes, but when a server goes POOF we would like to get it online again ASAP.

AIX does this very easily, I just can't correlate mksysb to anything on linux.

EDIT: It must be because linux wasn't around in the tape-backup era, otherwise I assume these tools would exist.  OH WELL.  I'll keep looking around.

I would be converting it to a VM then it is easy peasy to back up and restore in minutes, plus you can move it around to different physical hardware:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/V2V_Guide/chap-V2V_Guide-P2V_Migration_Converting_Physical_Machines_to_Virtual_Machines.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 13, 2013, 10:54:24 PM
I'm noticing some significant improvements in overall stability now, though in some games it still likes to drag in the teens, framerate-wise, and it's still a bit jumpy, especially when entering new areas.

I believe i can actually use amd overdrive and have it be stable now. huh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 13, 2013, 10:59:18 PM
Jumpy moving into new areas likely means your disk I/O is suffering (trying to load textures and level information from disk onto the card). You'll probably want to get an SSD at some point dedicated to games.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samprimary on December 13, 2013, 11:42:00 PM
Yeahhh, probably going to start with the ssd then.

This has been very useful information! Thanks for taking the time to help me figure out some solutions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 16, 2013, 09:47:03 AM
I would be converting it to a VM then it is easy peasy to back up and restore in minutes, plus you can move it around to different physical hardware:

I didn't ask about that since if it's not a VM now, I assumed there must be a reason for it.  Or the guy that asked me is thinking too primitively.  But yes, VMware should easily do this.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 16, 2013, 02:29:45 PM
P2V works pretty well if your VMware environment has access to the same IP/network space as the physical box so that you can keep your configuration (ours doesn't for a number of stupid reasons).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 16, 2013, 08:02:23 PM
Well, that would entail a migration project in all likelihood.  Not that I know anything about P2V except generally what it does.  The Winders admins used it for migration work that I wasn't directly involved in... I was using real computing systems. :why_so_serious:

Anyway, even if I decide that VMware backups are now the way to go, it still seems like it is or was a big gap in linux enterprise solutioning that you can't just take a backup of a server and then BOOM restore it in place or elsewhere.  Luckily I won't have to worry too much about it.  Not my project.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 16, 2013, 09:34:50 PM
it still seems like it is or was a big gap in linux enterprise solutioning that you can't just take a backup of a server and then BOOM restore it in place or elsewhere.  Luckily I won't have to worry too much about it.
Yes, you can.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 16, 2013, 10:06:04 PM
I'll amend it, then, to say that I don't know how to do it in a slick manner.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 22, 2013, 04:27:21 PM
I'm not ready for IPv6, suddenly things that I used to be familiar with do not look familiar (why does my gateway have letters in it  :ye_gods: ) anyone got a good link that explains what just happened and why?

Comcast seems to have rolled it out in the last couple weeks and ever since my network (especially wireless) has been way less good/reliable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 23, 2013, 05:06:39 AM
I'm not ready for IPv6, suddenly things that I used to be familiar with do not look familiar (why does my gateway have letters in it  :ye_gods: ) anyone got a good link that explains what just happened and why?

Comcast seems to have rolled it out in the last couple weeks and ever since my network (especially wireless) has been way less good/reliable.

If your devices are having problems with IPv6, just turn it off on your router. AFAIK Comcast runs dual-stack so it won't hurt your ability to connect to anything (unless it is v6 only, but I have not heard of anything that has gone that way yet).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 06, 2014, 04:05:47 PM
Mom wants to spend $400 to $600 on a new laptop. Someone just point me to whatever the standard is for things in that price range. 10 points to the Wizard School of their choice if it's an amazon link because I'm shameless. I don't really care where the link comes from. Here's what you need to know about the laptop:

She'll use, uhhh Outlook and Microsoft Word. Maybe Powerpoint if she's feeling saucy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 06, 2014, 04:32:08 PM
How portable does it need to be? Does she have good eyesight (i.e. can use a small screen with very high DPI)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 06, 2014, 04:33:28 PM
How portable does it need to be? Does she have good eyesight (i.e. can use a small screen with very high DPI)?
I'm thinking between 14 and 16" but 17" may be too bulky. I wouldn't go smaller than 14 though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on January 06, 2014, 07:38:13 PM
Have fun with the Windows 8, I just walked into Costco and told my Dad to buy this one, then spent the next 3 days getting it to look like something he was used to:
http://www.costco.com/Dell-Inspiron-15-Touchscreen-Laptop-%7c-Intel-Core-i3.product.100082432.html

edit - the Metro replacement for Outlook is shit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 07, 2014, 03:15:26 PM
How portable does it need to be? Does she have good eyesight (i.e. can use a small screen with very high DPI)?
Any luck?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on January 07, 2014, 03:57:20 PM
Have fun with the Windows 8, I just walked into Costco and told my Dad to buy this one, then spent the next 3 days getting it to look like something he was used to:
http://www.costco.com/Dell-Inspiron-15-Touchscreen-Laptop-%7c-Intel-Core-i3.product.100082432.html

edit - the Metro replacement for Outlook is shit.

I had to do something similar for my wife. Similar model too. She uses Desktop mode exclusively. After configuring a bunch of shit, her Win8 experience is basically the same as Win7 except that the Start menu is a full screen set of tiles instead of the clean list of icons and names she was used to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 07, 2014, 07:22:04 PM
How portable does it need to be? Does she have good eyesight (i.e. can use a small screen with very high DPI)?
Any luck?
Dell Inspiron 15 (http://smile.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_st?keywords=dell+laptop+inspiron+15&qid=1389151206&rh=n%3A172282%2Cn%3A541966%2Cn%3A565108%2Ck%3Adell+laptop+inspiron+15%2Cp_85%3A2470955011%2Cp_89%3ADell&sort=popularity-rank). One issue with those though is they only have 1366 x 768 screens.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 16, 2014, 06:18:52 AM
Recommendations on IP-phone management software to replace the free one from Comcast?  Office of five to seven phones.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 16, 2014, 01:04:12 PM
What sort of capabilities are you talking about here?  And price?  Are you talking a full PBX?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 16, 2014, 03:33:19 PM
Recommendations on IP-phone management software to replace the free one from Comcast?  Office of five to seven phones.

I have heard a lot of people say they like Asterisk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 17, 2014, 06:13:36 AM
What sort of capabilities are you talking about here?  And price?  Are you talking a full PBX?

Basic capability but not as dumb-ass bare-bones as the free offering.  Not a PBX since... IP phones?  I don't really know anything about IP phone systems other than they probably just run as a service on a Win server.

One complaint from the wife is that she gets VM on her PC but still has to dial in the phone to delete the message and have the light stop blinking.  Or something.  Also something about not being able to transfer calls.  She wasn't completely coherent in her ranting, also I didn't take notes.  I expect she wants:
1. Email on VM toggle
2. Transfer and conference without any BS
3. Respectable but simple message management

I suppose the best way to think of her office is to imagine an office of five people set in a 1970's TV show.  Barney Miller will yell to Sgt. Fish that someone want to talk to him, and he transfers the call over to Fish's desk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 17, 2014, 06:39:18 AM
I have heard a lot of people say they like Asterisk.

Apparently this is a framework, which would be great if I was going to deploy a phone system myself.

I just talked to my wife a few minutes ago and she said "Don't look for a phone system, I'm paying Ryan to do that."  So, thanks everyone. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 17, 2014, 04:39:22 PM
She has an office of 5 people? What do they use for email/calendaring?

If they are already semi-invested in MS products, going with the Office365 tier that includes lync might not be a bad choice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 21, 2014, 05:42:12 AM
As far as I know, they use Office.  I'll remember O360 for when it comes up again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 21, 2014, 03:51:20 PM
Ironwood would be more knowledgeable about this than me, but when I last priced it out it really seemed like Office365 was such a better deal for the money than paying for stand alone Office licensing for a small business. I could not get the people I was pricing it out for to go for it because, well, they are 'special'  :drill:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 21, 2014, 04:47:08 PM
Yes, people like to "own" things.

I read the front page or two of the site and it looks nice and cheap, as well as somewhat fancy.  The thing I immediately wondered about was how to go about setting up Lync with office phones, and decided I'd let Ryan worry about it. :awesome_for_real:  If it was my office, I'd probably do it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 21, 2014, 11:04:18 PM
I am not sure how office365 handles stand alone IP phones but there are several different varieties of them that work well with the full blown version. I have a USB Polycom CX300 on my desk that works like a normal phone when I am signed into lync on the computer (it is basically a headset shaped like a desk phone)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 22, 2014, 06:41:46 AM
Sorry, I don't regularly check this thread :

Chimpy is right.  I would seriously look at 365 for this.  Owning things is a retarded excuse not to go for it, since with IP phones or software, you don't own shit these days anyway.

With 365 the additional functionality you get on smart and mobile phones as part of the package is also a huge bonus to consider.  Possibly one of the new Mid-Sized business offerings might work for you ?  I don't really recommend the small business flavours because they suck so much ass.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on January 22, 2014, 10:54:40 AM
Had a friend with a 5+ year old desktop gaming machine that has probably been on its last legs for awhile. He was having what I thought were power issues (couldn't run his cd drive and external hd at the same time) so I had him get a solid SeaSonic PSU that he can also carry over to his next build that we'll have to do sometime this year I'd  bet.

So his computer wouldn't post after he had torn it down and hooked everything back up but that was just because he had not plugged in the 4-pin ATX correctly. I fixed that and the computer seemed fine, I ordered the new PSU and told him I'd come hook it up when it showed.

Apparently the machine worked for a couple of days but he stopped getting a display.

I can't get a display and what is even more strange is I'm not getting solid power seemingly to the main usb ports. I get no light from mice except a brief flash when I unplug them but some random wifi dongle does get enough power to flash blinky green lights.

I've:
-tested both the old psu and the new psu.
-tried two different gpu's and tried to use the mobo built in vga and dvi.
-tested 2 monitors

And I can't get any display.

Its gotta be motherboard right? What should I try? I can't think of anything beyond clearing the CMOS battery which is just a thing I remember from way back when nothing I've done before.

The HD spins, all fans work, including on the gpu's.

I'm pretty sure its not PSU since one is brand new.

I'm pretty sure its not Monitor since one is brand new.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 22, 2014, 11:23:09 AM
If the motherboard has a BIOS reset button I would try that. Is there an internal speaker hooked up so you can hear POST beeps or does it have a POST code display on the MB?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 22, 2014, 12:04:21 PM
With 365 the additional functionality you get on smart and mobile phones as part of the package is also a huge bonus to consider.  Possibly one of the new Mid-Sized business offerings might work for you ?  I don't really recommend the small business flavours because they suck so much ass.

I'd like more detail due to academic curiosity and from being an unpaid consultant, but I'd need to pay you.  The amount and brand of ass may or may not be tolerable, for the money involved; I can always say "Yeah, but it's only $5 per month."  Also we will need for the old folks to retire; that may seem odd but they are impervious to technology and own the place.  Anyway, I primed the pump today with 360 and was not immediately rejected.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 22, 2014, 01:35:35 PM
365 is neither complicated nor arcane.  I'm happy to provide information and advice.

Frankly, it's just the same way of doing stuff that they'll always have done, so I wouldn't worry them unduly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on January 24, 2014, 02:24:36 PM
I have heard a lot of people say they like Asterisk.
Since I forgot to check back, I just wanted to mention that Asterisk can do quite a bit, but it can be a pain to manage, too.  You need someone who can dedicate enough time to it.  Preferably one with programming experience that doesn't mind learning its scripting language.

Switchvox is a decent low-cost PBX if you have a good number of office phones.  (It's built on Asterisk and has a pretty good GUI, but you can't modify anything the GUI doesn't have a setting for either...)

Most places will probably be better off going with Office 365 or a big PBX like Cisco if they need to do it in-house.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 24, 2014, 03:02:00 PM
This group of misfits has the IT they deserve.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Signe on February 19, 2014, 12:09:48 PM
I have tried and tried and tried to register this stoopid new computer and it just won't do it.  I keep getting stoopid registration pop-ups that I can't seem to disable.  Do I REALLY need to register my computer?  Ok, so this isn't really a tech question and I don't really care all that much but I wanted to see Trippy say something.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 19, 2014, 12:11:20 PM
What kind of computer and OS is (are?) it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Signe on February 19, 2014, 12:18:46 PM
Wow, you are quick. 

It's an Asus M51AC-B05 and it's running 8.1 which I hate but I made it look like 7.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 19, 2014, 12:35:52 PM
ASUS laptops typically come with a lot of bloatware including that product registration program. Go to Control Panel -> Uninstall a Program and see if there's an "ASUS Product Register Program" or similar and uninstall it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Signe on February 19, 2014, 01:59:24 PM
It's not there and, yes, I spent the yesterday removing all the shit they stick on it.  Annoying.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 19, 2014, 02:03:59 PM
If you can figure out how to get to the Run command in Windows 8 you can try 'msconfig' (no quotes) and then go to the startup items sections and see what sort of crap is in there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Signe on February 20, 2014, 08:44:10 AM
I pretty much found most stuff that was bothering me and deleted or disabled it but I can't find that registration thingy.  I emailed the company and complained.  I'm sure they're spending all their time trying to find a solution for me which is why they haven't written back. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on February 20, 2014, 02:09:24 PM
What is it wanting you to register?  Windows? The ASUS laptop? Some other piece of software?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on February 21, 2014, 07:49:46 AM
Its probably the hardware.  Like Trippy said, ASUS loves to have you register their shit.  I had the same issue with my PC until I got fed up and just registered the motherboard and CPU.

In Windows 8, you can hit Windows-C to bring up the charm bar on the right, which has a search function similar to the Windows menu in 7.  In case you want to mess around with msconfig like Trippy also suggested.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Signe on February 21, 2014, 10:18:44 AM
Asus wants me to register.  I've disabled nearly everything that says "Asus" so I'll see if it happens again.  I did try and search for it separately with no success and msconfig was where I went first.  I have that app that makes my desktop look like 7 so all that stuff is where I'm used to it being.  I have no idea why Windows decided I needed to have two weird screens to look at before I get to my desktop.  This computer also tricked me into having a password.  I don't want a password but it won't let me not have it now.  Luckily this thing has other features I like or it would be so sent back to the annoying place from whence it came. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on February 21, 2014, 12:11:32 PM
They might have been sneaky by putting the registration program in a more obvious place, the startup folder.

And I googled windows 8 startup folder in case microsoft screwed with that too, and they did.  Hopefully you can still get there from your windows 7 lookalike program by just going to the start menu but if not here is the horrible way windows 8 makes you do it.

http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/where-is-startup-folder-how-to-edit-startup-items-in-windows-8/

Edit: I dunno if this would help with the password. (http://www.pcworld.com/article/2054380/disable-windows-logon-password.html)  It also looks horrible to use due to windows 8.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Signe on February 22, 2014, 08:36:08 AM
It hasn't shown up lately.  I don't know exactly what I did but I went to all the places you guys said to and turned off all sorts of things that looked dodgy and I suppose something worked.  I still have the password issue, though.  Anyway, thanks to everyone for helping with this small, yet very frustrating, issue.  I haven't heard back from the company.  Maybe I should let them know they can stop frantically working on my problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on February 23, 2014, 05:55:31 PM
Anyone familliar / knowledgable with the inner workings of No-Script for Firefox?

Recent update of No-Script seems to have broken the comments functionality of the WoWhead website.  Literally every other feature works, but I can not manage to bring up the comments section for anything on the site.  I have tried allowing EVERYTHING I can possibly allow through for the site under the No-script options menu, and it still remains unavailable.  Driving me a bit nuts.

edit: Annnddd never mind.  Turns out manually updating it to the current beta build fixed the problem. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Selby on February 23, 2014, 08:21:14 PM
Anyone familliar / knowledgable with the inner workings of No-Script for Firefox?
Yeah, something they did in the latest "auto update" RC broke JavaScript, even for white listed sites.  I went back to the previous stable version and it fixed it.  Was quite a frustrating Saturday morning for me until I figured it out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on February 24, 2014, 03:55:54 AM
Anyone have recommendations for a reasonably good mid-range tablet? I was looking at the Samsung Galaxy TAB3 10.1" 16GB, except it turns out it lacks even a micro-USB port.

I plan to use it primarily for browsing PDFs for tabletop games (rulebooks, etc and some are pretty damned big), eBooks, surfing the internets and such. I'd like at least a 10" screen but no need to be larger - like I said - it's very much going to be a rulebook proxy to keep wear and tear off expensive hardcovers and the like, so I don't want a small one.

Also, no iPads please.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on February 24, 2014, 05:23:54 AM
Ah, I would've recommended the Nexus 7 without hesitation but that won't do if you're set on a 10" screen.

The Nexus 10 is a bit long in the tooth now and suffers from the problem that I feel all 10"+ tablets have which is they're too expensive. All of them! That size screen requires more processing power & RAM (unless it's really low resolution), more powerful batteries and generally raises the cost of tablets out of what I consider sensible for their capabilities.

If I had to make recommendations then I'd still put the Nexus 10 first. The Sony Experia Z is worth a look but it's even more expensive, although it's nice to use and feels like a quality bit of kit. The Lenovo Yoga pad is one I've heard good things about (although people complain it's lacking in oomph a bit) but I've not used it myself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on March 03, 2014, 09:19:23 PM
Hm. Someone from work is recommending this one pretty heavily:

http://www.harveynorman.com.au/microsoft-surface-pro-128gb-tablet.html?CAWELAID=1925826175&gclid=CPyf_qiP-LwCFRMIvAodZU4AVA&gclsrc=aw.ds

It's a bit more than I wanted to spend - but are there any major advantages/disadvantages with going with a Win8 tablet vs Android? Or this one specifically vs the Nexus 10?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 03, 2014, 10:57:25 PM
Well, it's a Windows machine, and if you're familiar with Android at all you know what a different beast Windows is.

But, $600. Still, it's a lot better than the launch price of those which I seem to recall was about double that. They've halved in price because nobody bought them. Most of the reviews I read of the Surfaces were dominated by outrage at the exorbitant cost, but I've not read anything about them since the huge price drops. Do some review hunting, see what you think.

But, heh, $600.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on March 03, 2014, 11:03:06 PM
Yeah, well, it's AU$600 though - and we always get ripped off on this shit. The Nexus 10 is $400 comparatively, so 32gb vs 89gb (after Win8 takes it's space off the 128 - not sure how much Android takes up) - but the theory is I can use it for Office etc (I can get a cheap copy from work) and as more of a portable computer/netbook than as just a tablet to use for wargame rulebooks. So I'm wondering if it's worth half again over the Nexus 10. Comparatively.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 04, 2014, 12:33:37 AM
Hmm, well given that the Nexus is so expensive for you it does make the Surface look like a decent option then for sure.

The Nexus is a content consumption device, you couldn't do any serious work on it. The Surface might actually be usable for Office, especially with one of those keyboard cover things, if they're not hideously overpriced.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 04, 2014, 05:52:29 AM
If you want/need to work in MS Office then a Surface Pro is what you will probably want to look at. The Surface Pro 2 included a lot of improvements over the original (and has had a stealth speed bump since release) and is pretty much a midrange laptop/desktop replacement capable machine with the correct peripherals.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on March 08, 2014, 05:54:03 AM
Got a Surface Pro 1 - they're half the price of the SP2 right now. Also got the keyboard and a Bluetooth mouse. So far I've been using it more like a netbook than a tablet, but I have put my gaming PDFs onto it, so I can use it for the initial purpose whenever I like now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on March 11, 2014, 12:53:31 PM
This may not be quick. It may also have been answered previously, but I don't have the time to plumb the thread. Sorry.

My OS hard drive is failing, for the second time in five years. But it's not dead yet, just suffers lock ups now and again. I have a new drive, and while I can just reinstall everything from scratch, it seems to me there must be some way to copy all the data from the old OS drive to a new, then ditch the old and set the BIOS to boot off the new copy. It would save me days of install time and hundreds of Gigs of download.

Any place I could go for instructions on this?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 11, 2014, 01:01:22 PM
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/back-up-programs-system-settings-files#1TC=windows-7

? ? ? ?

Why are question marks making a cry-face?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 11, 2014, 02:48:09 PM
Because it's hard to see the little question marks above the dude's face.  That's why I made my own for when I want to use : huh :.

(http://hotlink.escapedredpanda.net/smiley/huh.gif)

I know it's painful, but with a new drive I really prefer doing a fresh install.  It usually runs better in the long run.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on March 11, 2014, 03:16:29 PM
I'll give that a look, thanks.

It's going to end up being a "kind of" fresh install. Once I get my current Vista-64 install moved to a new and roomier HD, I'm going to run my upgrade to Win7. I think that gets me back to a near-fresh state, without having to reinstall all my utilities and games.

And if that's an incorrect assumption... well, then there'd be no reason to not nuke from orbit and start anew.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 11, 2014, 03:19:08 PM
I think more than 65% of my accumulated utilities are no longer "installed".  It's not really as bad as it sounds.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 11, 2014, 03:19:43 PM
Unless you can't possibly avoid it, never ever do an in place upgrade on Windows. If you want to keep profile stuff, use Windows Easy Transfer (included in Vista and up) to copy your files to a location then after setting up the new machine from scratch import said profiles.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on March 11, 2014, 11:45:44 PM
Windows Easy Transfer doesn't seem to be a solution for my particular problem - I don't have an entire new machine I'm looking to transfer files and settings to, I'm replacing the OS hard drive on a single system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on March 12, 2014, 02:18:38 AM
Sorry, are we missing the point ?  Do you want to reinstall or just copy the partition from the old drive to a new drive ?  Because the second option is really, really, really easy and there's a shitton of freeware that'll do it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 12, 2014, 06:03:52 AM
Windows Easy Transfer doesn't seem to be a solution for my particular problem - I don't have an entire new machine I'm looking to transfer files and settings to, I'm replacing the OS hard drive on a single system.

Easy Transfer allows you to save to a disk or network location as an option. If you install a fresh windows 7 (hint, if you are "upgrading" from Vista you should do a clean install) even on the same physical hardware it will still be a different system in the eyes of Easy Transfer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on March 18, 2014, 10:21:41 AM
Can someone recommend a tool or method on PC for capturing the audio from YouTube?  I was hoping there was an easy solution than recording stteams with Audacity or the like.  I'd like to do this AFK or not have manually manage starting / stopping recording.   Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on March 18, 2014, 10:51:57 AM
I think this still works. (http://www.youtube-mp3.org/)  It just converts the whole thing to mp3, you can't start/stop/edit, I'm not sure what you mean by that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 18, 2014, 11:05:01 AM
Can someone recommend a tool or method on PC for capturing the audio from YouTube?  I was hoping there was an easy solution than recording stteams with Audacity or the like.  I'd like to do this AFK or not have manually manage starting / stopping recording.   Thanks.
Download the video and then use a tool like mp4box or ffmpeg to extract the audio track.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Xuri on March 18, 2014, 09:53:52 PM
Btw, any videos you watch on YouTube will be stored in your browser's cache as long as you have the browser tab open. Look through the cache folders for files in the several-megabyte-large category, copy the most likely file (by timestamp), rename from .tmp extension (or whatever browser stores it in) to .flv (Flash Video) extension. Play in your favourite media player (VLC!).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 19, 2014, 07:12:56 AM
Most higher resolution YouTube videos are in mp4 (H.264) format now. Also there are like a bazillion browser extensions that make downloading YouTube videos trivial, though Google did make a change recently to how they stream 1080p videos that makes capturing those more difficult.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Fabricated on March 19, 2014, 07:22:07 AM
Windows Easy Transfer doesn't seem to be a solution for my particular problem - I don't have an entire new machine I'm looking to transfer files and settings to, I'm replacing the OS hard drive on a single system.
Try Clonezilla.

http://clonezilla.org/

Burn a CD, boot it, copy a disk image to an external drive. Replace the failing HDD, boot the CD, load the image onto the new HDD. Dunno if windows will complain/freak out license-wise or if the replacement drive is a different model/size however.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on March 19, 2014, 08:21:54 AM
I'm getting too angry at all the free email services screwing up what should be a simple interface, doing creepier and creepier things with my data, constantly trying to make me sign in to their shitty messanger services and so on.  I only now realized they are appending First and Last name to my sender's email address.  I didn't create sendYourShittySpamHere@yahoo.com so that I could give away my real name...  Neither yahoo nor outlook has a way to turn that off.

At any rate, can anyone recommend a nice, simple email service that I pay a yearly charge for so that they don't read all my emails and try to advertise to me or sell my info.  Something that won't suddenly go bankrupt leaving the email account unreachable.  Maybe I should just put in the effort of creating my own domain.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 19, 2014, 09:19:26 AM
My domain host costs like $70 a year and gives unlimited mailboxes on top of the hosting.  It's totally worth it for me.  Though it's not why I got the hosting, I probably use it more for e-mail than anything else.

So yeah, if you're thinking about creating a domain, there's a solid benefit right there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on March 19, 2014, 11:36:23 PM
My domain host costs like $70 a year and gives unlimited mailboxes on top of the hosting.  It's totally worth it for me.  Though it's not why I got the hosting, I probably use it more for e-mail than anything else.
Ha, same here. I got in trouble with them a couple months ago for inadvertantly letting an unprotected Drupal instance run completely unmanaged for five years, whereupon spambots nearly murdered the shared server. I was all, "drop whatever databases you want but please don't turn off my email."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 20, 2014, 08:47:56 AM
I believe I use the same hosting as Lant, although I still use gmail as my primary.  Besides the unlimited email addresses, you can basically do whatever you want with your domain: HTML, SQL, whatever; I love these guys.  I stopped updating my site quite a while ago, though I still have my Amazon Associates link on it for easy kickback action.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on March 21, 2014, 11:28:50 AM
The PC died last night. I never got a chance to install the new HD, because my wife didn't get a chance to mail me my Vista install disks. But the way it broke leads me to believe the HD was never the problem at all.

I turn the box on, and never even get a BIOS post message. Am I correct to conclude this means the motherboard is dead?

If so, is it possible to move a CPU from an old MB to a new one? I don't think I've ever seen/heard of it being done.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on March 21, 2014, 12:38:40 PM
Quote
I turn the box on, and never even get a BIOS post message. Am I correct to conclude this means the motherboard is dead?

Motherboard, CPU, GPU, or memory. Something hardware. Some systems will beep or blink to tell you which one. Definitely not the hard drive though.

Quote
If so, is it possible to move a CPU from an old MB to a new one? I don't think I've ever seen/heard of it being done.

Absolutely. Take off the cooler carefully. The goop will stick it to the CPU and it might take some joggling to get it loose. Then the CPU just comes out by moving hte lever. You need to get the heat transfer goop off the CPU and apply a fresh coat when you remount the cooler on the new board. I'd probably clean it while it's on the dead board so you don't damage the pins or spill alcohol on the new mobo.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 21, 2014, 12:50:44 PM
The PC died last night. I never got a chance to install the new HD, because my wife didn't get a chance to mail me my Vista install disks. But the way it broke leads me to believe the HD was never the problem at all.

I turn the box on, and never even get a BIOS post message. Am I correct to conclude this means the motherboard is dead?

If so, is it possible to move a CPU from an old MB to a new one? I don't think I've ever seen/heard of it being done.
Could be power supply. Yes you can move the CPU but depending on the age of the CPU you may have difficulty finding a motherboard for it. These days Intel literally changes CPU sockets every chip design.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on March 21, 2014, 01:03:17 PM
Yeaaaah. Newegg lists precisely one model that fits an Intel Core 2 Quad and DDR2, from a no-name manufacturer. But I don't really have the money to buy a new CPU as well.

I don't think it's the power supply - my problems up to this point have involved BSODs and hard system lockups. I've lost PSUs before, and the effects were different.

EDIT: Moving the rest of this to "building a new PC," since that's what I;m looking at in one way or another.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 21, 2014, 01:55:16 PM
Yeaaaah. Newegg lists precisely one model that fits an Intel Core 2 Quad and DDR2, from a no-name manufacturer. But I don't really have the money to buy a new CPU as well.

I don't think it's the power supply - my problems up to this point have involved BSODs and hard system lockups. I've lost PSUs before, and the effects were different.

Bad PSU can cause just about any kind of failure condition you can imagine. If a machine won't post it is usually the first thing I would try and replace/test.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 22, 2014, 08:14:29 AM
Need a new router.
  • Have always liked the Linksys admin environment. But given what I've seen Cisco been doing, I couldn't be convinced to go to another manufacturer.
  • I definitely don't want one that requires some jank software installation. Fine if the device comes with a disk as long as I can ignore the disk. I seriously would consider the E900 (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007IL764W) if for no other reason than it's the only one that doesn't have the Cisco Connect Software included.
  • Want 4 ethernet ports, not sure if I really want to pay the premium for 1000Base-T. I don't do a lot of things between computers and devices, it's usually devices to internet. Have three wired devices and 8-12 wireless ones on any given day. Only 2-3 are ever watching video at any given time. One will be gaming, the rest are like Facebook and email.
  • Hadn't given much thought to USB Storage Port before I started seeing that option. Would be nice to hang a NAS on this.
  • Don't absolutely need a media server. We're mostly iTunes based. Just because.
  • Finally, range is important but I can strategically place this one. We have a wide property. So either I can get this router to cover it good enough, or I consider  ones with proven extender devices that work well?
Given the above, seems like a relatively short list. The first three or Cisco, the fourth is the asus one I stumbled on:

Linksys EA3500 App-Enabled N750 Dual-Band Wireless-N Router with Gigabit and USB (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004T9RR4A)- $100 avg ($70 on deal)- Basically the same tech as my current router, fine as a like-to-like replacement.
Linksys E2500 (N600) Advanced Simultaneous Dual-Band Wireless-N Router (http://www.amazon.com/Linksys-E2500-Simultaneous-Dual-Band-Wireless-N/dp/B004T9RR4A/ref=dp_ob_title_ce)- $100 avg ($70 on deal). Not 1000Base-T, but also no Cisco Cloud Connect, which reads like the exact kind of thing I'll need some convincing is worth it.
Linksys EA6500 Smart Wi-Fi Dual-Band AC Router with Gigabit and 2x USB (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008I21EA2)- $200 avg ($165 on deal). Has everything, but including that Cloud thing, and I'm suspicious of anything called "SimpleTapTechnology" because that sounds like "Simple[and proprietary download this software crap]Technology".
ASUS RT-AC66U Dual-Band Wireless-AC1750 Gigabit Router (http://www.amazon.com/RT-AC66U-Dual-Band-Wireless-AC1750-Gigabit-Router/dp/B008ABOJKS/ref=dp_ob_title_ce)- $200 avg ($168 on deal) Good price, Gigabit WAN which is nice but I'll never get that from Cox. Not sure if those antennae are just something they threw in for looks or if they really do anything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on March 22, 2014, 09:12:35 AM
And regarding routers, who is on top of what is actually secure these days?  File security (WPA2 is no good anymore?) on top of those other requirements.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 22, 2014, 11:19:02 AM
Need a new router.
  • Have always liked the Linksys admin environment. But given what I've seen Cisco been doing, I couldn't be convinced to go to another manufacturer.
  • I definitely don't want one that requires some jank software installation. Fine if the device comes with a disk as long as I can ignore the disk. I seriously would consider the E900 (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007IL764W) if for no other reason than it's the only one that doesn't have the Cisco Connect Software included.
  • Want 4 ethernet ports, not sure if I really want to pay the premium for 1000Base-T. I don't do a lot of things between computers and devices, it's usually devices to internet. Have three wired devices and 8-12 wireless ones on any given day. Only 2-3 are ever watching video at any given time. One will be gaming, the rest are like Facebook and email.
  • Hadn't given much thought to USB Storage Port before I started seeing that option. Would be nice to hang a NAS on this.
  • Don't absolutely need a media server. We're mostly iTunes based. Just because.
  • Finally, range is important but I can strategically place this one. We have a wide property. So either I can get this router to cover it good enough, or I consider  ones with proven extender devices that work well?
Given the above, seems like a relatively short list. The first three or Cisco, the fourth is the asus one I stumbled on:

Linksys EA3500 App-Enabled N750 Dual-Band Wireless-N Router with Gigabit and USB (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004T9RR4A)- $100 avg ($70 on deal)- Basically the same tech as my current router, fine as a like-to-like replacement.
Linksys E2500 (N600) Advanced Simultaneous Dual-Band Wireless-N Router (http://www.amazon.com/Linksys-E2500-Simultaneous-Dual-Band-Wireless-N/dp/B004T9RR4A/ref=dp_ob_title_ce)- $100 avg ($70 on deal). Not 1000Base-T, but also no Cisco Cloud Connect, which reads like the exact kind of thing I'll need some convincing is worth it.
Linksys EA6500 Smart Wi-Fi Dual-Band AC Router with Gigabit and 2x USB (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008I21EA2)- $200 avg ($165 on deal). Has everything, but including that Cloud thing, and I'm suspicious of anything called "SimpleTapTechnology" because that sounds like "Simple[and proprietary download this software crap]Technology".
ASUS RT-AC66U Dual-Band Wireless-AC1750 Gigabit Router (http://www.amazon.com/RT-AC66U-Dual-Band-Wireless-AC1750-Gigabit-Router/dp/B008ABOJKS/ref=dp_ob_title_ce)- $200 avg ($168 on deal) Good price, Gigabit WAN which is nice but I'll never get that from Cox. Not sure if those antennae are just something they threw in for looks or if they really do anything.

Cisco no longer owns Linksys, they sold it to Belkin. Belkin has historically made some of the shittiest, worst security home routers in existence.

I have heard generally positive reviews for the Apple Airport base stations/time capsules but they are a bit spendy.

My advice is to not try to throw too many eggs into the basket of your wireless router. If you want a NAS buy a NAS device. NAS manufacturers tend to update their software more frequently than router firmware so if a security hole is found it is more likely to be closed. There are several file security vulnerabilities targeting home routers (one of the most recent was on an ASUS and was pretty egregious) out there right now. Buy a router that has the connection speed you want in the price range you are looking for.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 22, 2014, 11:29:10 AM
Ah good point about Linksys. Yea I had a Belkin router once. Once. /dannyvermin.

A couple of folks I know love their Airports. Nothing against the device per se, but too expensive for what I need.

I'll look up the security things about Asus. I'm liking that model more and more. I don't live in a densely populated city or anything, but I also don't want a device/platform so insecure even some local yokel could screw with it.

Edit: meant to ask: was the Asus (and apparently Linksys) issue one of those where people weren't changing the default settings on their browsers? Some of the quick googl'ing I did implied that, but did also talk about how Asus updated their firmware and Linksys was "aware of the issue".

Exploiting default settings is one thing. I put that somewhat on the end user. But if it's more than that, I'd be worried.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 22, 2014, 11:47:54 AM
The ASUS one was that if you used the USB port to attach storage, people could acess the file system of the attached device from outside of the local network. I don't think this was isolated to those who did not change their default username/password.

I can't remember where I read the article, it was a couple months ago though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 22, 2014, 11:53:27 AM
Yea there were a few Feb and early March articles I found. Some were pretty egregious. This article (http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/03/hackers-hijack-300000-plus-wireless-routers-make-malicious-changes) for example went through a bunch of notes. Interestingly, in the comments, two themes seem to come up:

  • There are fans of Buffalo routers (http://www.amazon.com/BUFFALO-AirStation-HighPower-Wireless-WZR-600DHP/dp/B0096239G0); and in large part because:
  • There are fans of the DD-WRT firmware which come by default on Buffalo (guess can be side-loaded on others)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 22, 2014, 12:06:08 PM
Buffalo hardware is absolute shit. We used them running DD-WRT as cheap access points for a dumb "per unit wireless" setup for apartment complexes at the ISP I worked at and they were horrid. Of course, this was a few years ago but I still would never buy something with their name on it. Also, Buffalo does not install DD-WRT by default, they install their own custom firmware which is based on DD-WRT. Most of those people who are fans of it because it "has DD-WRT" are people who hear all the "DD-WRT > all, if you don't use DD-WRT you are a n00b" comments on the internet and jump on them to be in the cool kids club.

If you are wanting to go DD-WRT/Tomato/OpenWRT, just buy hardware that you see is supported by the newest release of said OS build and buy that and flash it yourself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 22, 2014, 01:30:01 PM
ASUS RT-AC66U Dual-Band Wireless-AC1750 Gigabit Router (http://www.amazon.com/RT-AC66U-Dual-Band-Wireless-AC1750-Gigabit-Router/dp/B008ABOJKS/ref=dp_ob_title_ce)- $200 avg ($168 on deal) Good price, Gigabit WAN which is nice but I'll never get that from Cox. Not sure if those antennae are just something they threw in for looks or if they really do anything.
I have the NetGear Nighthawk (http://www.netgear.com/home/products/networking/wifi-routers/R7000.aspx) which is a direct competitor to the above router as both have "AC1900" support. My previous long-term router was the previous gen Time Capsule which worked very well. The internal power supply on that died though after many years so I switched to the latest gen Time Capsule. Unfortunately the one I got couldn't keep a stable connection so I replaced it with the Nighthawk. The USB attached storage (aka "ReadyShare") didn't work so well for me on the Nighthawk so I turned it off. The wireless connection part is working fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 22, 2014, 01:56:00 PM
Nice. Thanks guys. Good points on Buffalo Chimpy. I had never even heard of DD-WRT. I'll check out that router Trippy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 22, 2014, 03:38:18 PM
I have a NetGear N600 and it's served me well.  I don't have that many users at once, though I do have a few switches hanging off it since we have computers, consoles, printer, and NAS plus any visiting devices.

The older NetGear that got hit by lightning was solid.  D-Link isn't too bad, but is definitely built more cheaply.  I think I'd pick Netgear between the three, with a Linksys being at the bottom of my list.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on March 22, 2014, 04:36:09 PM
I'm not sure I'll ever forgive Netgear for those flat silver routers they were making way back in 2002-6 that were such utter utter shit. They were also way ahead of the curve in terms of the end of useful customer service. I remember calling them, getting India then being told "if you want real CS you need to pay a membership fee". Fuck those guys.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on March 22, 2014, 06:21:45 PM
Does anyone have any idea why, when I'm forced to reboot my router and internet connection, it takes Windows 7 approximately eight million hours to see the wireless connection again?

Last time every other wireless device in the house -- iPads, phones, Xbox, laptops -- saw the network the second it came up. It took Windows 7 a good ten minutes, despite me hammering the refresh button.

It simply refused to admit that wireless connection even existed. It wasn't an option to try to connect to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 22, 2014, 10:20:05 PM
Gigabit on your 4-5 port router isn't exactly a premium item, I would go so far as to think that anything that didn't have gigabit is using outdated crap you don't want.  I have a netgear wndr3800 I thought I was happy with but here I am at the year mark and it is displaying typical wireless router meltdown syndrome.  I think my next router is going to be an airport extreme and if that one starts crapping out before the 2 year mark I'm going to build my own damn wifi router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on March 24, 2014, 05:07:06 AM
Quote
The USB attached storage (aka "ReadyShare") didn't work so well for me on the Nighthawk so I turned it off. The wireless connection part is working fine.

We have an earlier model and I'd say the same thing. For storage, it just wasn't reliable. The throughput on the router is great and the range is decent though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 24, 2014, 12:01:06 PM
I'll risk being completely unhelpful and say that my WRT54GL router is still humming.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 24, 2014, 12:53:22 PM
I'll risk being completely unhelpful and say that my WRT54GL router is still humming.

And since Linksys is in touch with the world they think you will upgrade to this:
http://www.cnet.com/products/linksys-wrt1900ac-wireless-router/

They probably can't give you the same 10 years of trouble free performance but hey it is really all about the crappy blue retro looking case.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on March 25, 2014, 11:18:54 PM
Trippy and Chimpy - there's a good chance you were right.

I got the PC working again and tonight I heard some weird noises from inside the case. I cracked it open and investigated. When I powered it up I found the PSU exhaust fan has stopped working.

My first priority has become to replace that. We'll see how performance is afterwards. It's probably still a good idea to upgrade the 2009-vintage mobo, CPU, and RAM.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 28, 2014, 12:21:15 PM
So I was building a server using Dell's server configuration tool and I was curious what would be a faster RAID setup:

8 drives in RAID 5 using: 300GB 15K RPM SAS 6Gbps 2.5in Hot-plug Hard Drive

OR

3 drives in RAID 5 using: 1.2TB 10K RPM SAS 6Gbps 2.5in Hot-plug Hard Drive

On the one hand you have spindle speed and more drives to stripe and on the other your presumably have a much greater storage density.  Is this a no brainer shoot from the hip decision or is it impossible to answer without more detailed performance statistics for each drive?

The chasis can handle 24 drives so leaving room to upgrade the amount of storage I have doesn't really impact my decision overly much.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 28, 2014, 12:27:36 PM
Faster for what? Reading or writing or both?

Is this software RAID 5 or are you using hardware RAID cards?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 28, 2014, 01:05:06 PM
Hardware raid and although I realize RAID 5 is more conducive to faster read speeds I would think faster drives would increase both read and write speeds.

edit - the setup I am looking at is building a big monster hyper V host system to run our core business application, I was planning on a RAID 1 channel for the primary and log drives (so host os + 3 vxhd's for the 3 guest VM OS drives and 3 more vxhd's for the guest VM logging drives) then throw all the data drives for these on a RAID 5 channel (a vxhd for the sql server databases, a vxhd for the oracle database, a vxhd for the IIS websites).  Works out to each of the 3 VMs having 3 vxhd's mounted (os, log and data).

edit2 - According to Tom's Hardware (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/raid-5-scaling-tests-drives,852-7.html) the gains when using 8 drives vs. 3 drives can be dramatic and I think I can count on Dell to not sell me 300gb 15k drives that perform significantly worse than 1.2tb 10k drives and most likely even perform better.  So I guess it is pretty safe to assume that the 8x15k/300gb drive RAID 5 setup will perform better than the 3x10k/1.2tb drive setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 28, 2014, 01:58:39 PM
I leave that sort of thing to the SAN engineers, but just looking at it real quick my gut tells me 8 drives will be better than 3, provided your striping works worth a damn.  Because once you have to read from disk, you have already lost.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 28, 2014, 04:11:41 PM
Your definition of "monster" Hyper-V box and mine must be in totally different universes. I am curious as to why you are virtualizing if you are putting everything on one host (including storage) if this is for a single application.

As far as performance goes, the general consensus is that RAID 5 with disks 1TB and larger is bad juju and you want to go with RAID 6 with larger disks as your chance of disk failure is highest during a rebuild. Which means you need to have more disks than just the 3 you are speccing.

Which model Dell are you looking at? You can get 15k drives in 600GB if you go with 3.5" instead of 2.5".

If all 3 VMs require even a decent amount of IOPS you are going to have performance issues running them on the same LUN.

I highly recommend going with a SAN of some sort (and since you are talking Hyper-V, using a Cluster Shared Volume to store your vhd files on even if your cluster only has one host to start, that way you can add hosts and migrate guests between them with a lot less hassle). The MD3220i is a decent enough SAN (though it does not have a hardware VSS provider so if you use something like Veeam for backup you can't do off-host backup processing, which is lame.) The base model EqualLogic might fit the bill for you.

What kind of specs are you looking at? Also, if you are currently running on Dell hardware, they have a nice tool that you can run for like 24-48 hours which you send the data to them and they analyze it and tell you what your target IOPS are for the application.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on March 29, 2014, 02:15:49 PM
A decent SAN is going to be over budget, current trend in my sector seems to be moving away from SANs for apps with smaller volumes of data.  The app is a piece of crap "enterprise" java web app with an oracle database (soon to be migrated to MS SQL Server), we also have a light duty SQL Server that stores supplemental data to the enterprise app mostly custom stuff we wrote that integrates.  I wouldn't consider any of this large scale and any performance problems we currently have are pretty likely due to the poor quality of the enterprise app.  I was hoping to pick up some gain by setting up a virtual switch in hyper V and having the application VM and database VMs talk over that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 29, 2014, 04:00:12 PM
Are you running separate servers for your databases or running them as separate databases inside the same instance of Oracle/SQL? It sounds like you are running the former if you are talking about using an internal to the host network connection.

If you are transferring that much data between databases/apps that you think network latency and throughput are going to give you big performance gains you are not going to want that data coming from the same LUN, regardless of the speed of the disks in the host.

Also, RAID 10 is how you probably want to be configuring your disk as that is the best performance for transactional stuff. You could try it all running off of one RAID 10 pool.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 29, 2014, 06:36:52 PM
Disks are cheap, so I like RAID 10.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 29, 2014, 06:43:01 PM
Still haven't settled on a router. However, question about a family member's network.

They've got a Verizon DSL modem/router. It's 4 ethernet ports with built in wifi, in an office where they have six devices that need wires. They've been swapping ethernet cables in and out for devices as needed. I didn't know this until a few hours ago. It rankles.

I don't like modem/router combos but I don't know if they have a choice. How hard would it be to plug in an 8-port ethernet router into their modem/router, so they can get all the ports they need and then some? Is there any setting change I need to make in the DSL modem/router to let the router (which I'd plug into port 1) be able to sub-divide IPs further? Is that how it even works? I've never done anything more than worry about one router at a time.

If there's a For Dummies site out there for something like this, I'd be happy to read it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 29, 2014, 07:24:54 PM
I don't like modem/router combos but I don't know if they have a choice. How hard would it be to plug in an 8-port ethernet router into their modem/router, so they can get all the ports they need and then some?
Have them get an 8-port Gigabit switch like this one (http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-Unmanaged-Gigabit-GREENnet-TEG-S80g/dp/B001QUA6RA/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1396145603&sr=1-1&keywords=gigabit+switch+8+port). Then they just connect the two with a regular Ethernet cable and it just works*.

Quote
Is there any setting change I need to make in the DSL modem/router to let the router (which I'd plug into port 1) be able to sub-divide IPs further?
No.

* Technically you have to plug the Ethernet cable going from any of the ports on the router to the "uplink" port on the Ethernet switch. These days, however, any of the ports on even the cheapest Ethernet switches are "Auto-MDIX" which means any of them can act as the uplink port. If they happen to somehow get an ancient hub/switch that has a port specially marked as "Uplink" on the unit they should use that port instead.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 29, 2014, 08:06:02 PM
That's perfect, thanks Trippy!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on March 31, 2014, 07:28:36 AM
Yep, it'll work fine.  I have a router off my DSL, and then a switch connected to that for all the TV components.  At the old house it was reversed since the computer room was upstairs and the TV by the cable modem.  Never had an issue except it is an old switch that has a few bad ports.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 03, 2014, 03:05:40 PM
My font for Wikipedia recently started looking weird; I can't think of anything I did to change it, and it only happens in Firefox (v26). Things look fine in Chrome. Anyone have any ideas?
Pic:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 03, 2014, 03:17:57 PM
Is it zoomed out maybe?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 03, 2014, 04:37:47 PM
My font for Wikipedia recently started looking weird; I can't think of anything I did to change it, and it only happens in Firefox (v26). Things look fine in Chrome. Anyone have any ideas?
Pic:
Yes they changed the CSS:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-03-26/Op-ed

which may be affecting Firefox. Try clearing your browser cache.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 03, 2014, 05:42:15 PM
My font for Wikipedia recently started looking weird; I can't think of anything I did to change it, and it only happens in Firefox (v26). Things look fine in Chrome. Anyone have any ideas?
Pic:
Yes they changed the CSS:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-03-26/Op-ed

which may be affecting Firefox. Try clearing your browser cache.
No luck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 03, 2014, 07:43:50 PM
Try upgrading to 29? (or 28 if you don't want beta I think).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 03, 2014, 08:46:01 PM
Went to 28, still nothing. I guess I can start using Chrome for Wikipedia in addition to YT uploads.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 04, 2014, 01:34:40 AM
There's an addon called Theme Font & Size Changer (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/) that I use on the living room PC to make webpages more readable on a high DPI screen. Might be worth a try.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on April 04, 2014, 03:43:21 AM
The first comment on that page explains an opt out but it looks like you would have to be logged in.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 04, 2014, 03:50:49 PM
Except I'm not trying to opt out of the intended changes; my text doesn't look like it does in their example picture.
On the right is what it's supposed to look like, on the left is what it looks like on my end. I also don't even have a wikipedia account, nor do I feel like making one on the hope that it fixes.

apocrypha, might try that out, thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 06, 2014, 09:06:07 PM
Except I'm not trying to opt out of the intended changes; my text doesn't look like it does in their example picture.
Do you use the no script FF plugin?  If so check it's options and enable @font-face.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 08, 2014, 02:23:03 PM
Except I'm not trying to opt out of the intended changes; my text doesn't look like it does in their example picture.
Do you use the no script FF plugin?  If so check it's options and enable @font-face.
This fixed it, thanks a lot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on April 13, 2014, 02:00:52 PM
I've needed a password manager for awhile and after this week it's obviously overdue.  I'm looking at Lastpass and Keepass, should I be looking at any others? 

Initial overview of Lastpass seems to yield a few issues with security.  Being tied to the web seems to defeat the purpose of a manager.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 13, 2014, 03:33:49 PM
I like Password Safe.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2014, 05:58:19 PM
I use 1Password on PC, Mac, and iOS sync'd with Dropbox.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 13, 2014, 09:20:56 PM
This seems to be a fairly handy feature of lastpass:
http://lifehacker.com/lastpass-now-tells-you-which-heartbleed-affected-passwo-1561522244

I guess the upside of an online manager is it is easier for them to notify you of stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 14, 2014, 08:29:28 AM
I use 1Password on PC, Mac, and iOS sync'd with Dropbox.


What changed your mind about running Dropbox?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 14, 2014, 09:39:33 AM
Convenience. Also I only use Dropbox for 1Password which encrypts the 1Password data file before writing to disk so I don't have to worry about Dropbox giving my passwords to whomever it pleases.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on April 27, 2014, 02:37:24 PM
Anyone know why this file (below) would get put into my registry whenever I run a specific program?

HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FileExts\.2

Tried looking on Google, but all it said was that it might be associated with a trojan.  I've used CCcleaner, Malwarebytes, and superantispiware professional and they all find nothing but this bad registry error.  Hijack this says that it's a scary file, but I can't seem to figure out why a clean file keeps creating it.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 27, 2014, 03:20:56 PM
What program is adding that to the registry?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on April 27, 2014, 04:26:38 PM
What program is adding that to the registry?

It happens when I mod WoT with XVM.  The xvm file isn't corrupted, so I don't know why the registry is being created.  All I know is that as soon as it shows up in my registry, I can no longer access the XVM site and the mod crashes my game.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 27, 2014, 07:37:01 PM
You could make a batch file that clears the key.  Now that doesn't answer why it happens, which you probably want to solve in the long run, but to avoid having to hand-edit it all the time:

@echo off
REG DELETE HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FileExts\.2


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on April 28, 2014, 05:08:36 AM
CCCleaner takes care of the file.  I'm more interested in the reasons behind why such a file would have been generated in the first place. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 29, 2014, 07:02:08 AM
Registry entries aren't files.  They're lines that Windows, and unfortunately other programs, use for all kinds of information.  If permissions aren't locked down, they're as easy to add or change as that one line I posted.

Because of that, and terrible programming practices, people stick all kinds of shit in the registry that shouldn't go there.

(I really, really want the Windows registry to go away.  I wouldn't mind a master file that lets you know where to find settings, but it should be a reference and not a control.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on April 29, 2014, 09:26:51 AM
Thanks Lantyssa.  I need to be more careful with the terms that I use. 

I'm just interested in finding the source.  I think I've solved the issue but would like to better understand the process by which it occurred in the first place.  I've been reading a lot of tech support forums over the past week and it's shown me that there are a lot of similar issues out there with no real solution... it's a world of work-arounds.

The whole thing makes me glad that I'm not in the programming/coding world.  What a mess.   


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 29, 2014, 10:26:05 AM
I am pretty sure there are ways to audit what is being written to the registry by what program when it is done, but as far as I know it is not straight forward.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on April 29, 2014, 10:29:39 AM
I am pretty sure there are ways to audit what is being written to the registry by what program when it is done, but as far as I know it is not straight forward.

While it may not be related to the issue I'm having, I've been trying to learn more about python logs for this reason.  I'm hoping to better understand the process behind how things work or at least the order or operation.  This stuff is pretty fascinating.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Fordel on May 08, 2014, 12:21:40 PM
What's a decent anti-virus replacement for MS Essentials on old and bust XP systems? Both my father and sister are still on XP and are unlikely to get a newer version of windows any time soon.


Also, are any of those parental control programs actually worth a damn at all? Apparently my nephew is googling naughty things already  :why_so_serious: .


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 08, 2014, 02:29:17 PM
MS is still going to release definition updates for MSE on XP until July 2015.


Malwarebytes is pretty good and if you pay for the full version it will do active scanning.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on May 12, 2014, 10:50:47 AM
I need new headphones.  My shitty steelseries ones are starting to completely die now.  Previously, I could get them to work by wiggling them a bit in the socket, but now they're just completely fading out.  My other standbys are complete ear rape and I dislike using earbuds for an extended period of time.

I've had the Logitech G35's recommended to me by a couple people.  I mostly just care about comfort and the option to use a semi-decent mic. I don't talk much on voice coms in games (my house has thin walls and my voice carries well), so that's not super important quality wise.  Sound quality isn't something I need to pay a premium for, as I'm not much of an audiophile.

Any other suggestions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on May 12, 2014, 11:54:55 AM
These are slightly above the price point of what I would consider "cheap" I have not tried them but I am tempted:
http://www.amazon.com/Wireless-Stereo-Headset-Playstation-3/dp/B0053OLY9O/ref=cm_cd_al_qh_dp_i

Generally whenever I buy Sony headphones my expectations are exceeded, of course when I do buy Sony headphones my expectations are not in the "omfg these are gonna be awesome" range.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Miasma on May 12, 2014, 12:05:42 PM
I like my terribly named (G4ME) Sennheiser headset.  I don't think I'd buy them again however as they cost too much, I bought them at the time because they were one of the first headsets to cover the entire ear which was a huge step up for comfort.  That logitech set looks like it would do the same thing for less money.  I don't trust usb based sound and think the fake leather padding would be sticky and uncomfortable though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 12, 2014, 01:13:27 PM
If you are looking for headphones without a mic, the MDR-7506 by Sony is still one of the best you can buy. The cheaper MDR-V6 are also decent but they are not quite the same build quality (I use them at work) as the 7506.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 12, 2014, 02:25:24 PM
I use the G35 too. I have an older model Corsair Vengeance 2000 as well but that isn't as comfortable on my head.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 12, 2014, 04:31:58 PM
I was watching my son this evening and I believe that the Sony headset cord is possibly delicious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on May 13, 2014, 09:52:40 AM
I have the MDR-V6 Sony monitor headset and other than not having a mike and a rather cumbersome telephone style coiled chord, the sound quality is truly fantastic. Note that it is not USB, and that can confuse the living crap out of your system's board if it can't tell the difference between a headphone jack and your speaker jack.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on May 20, 2014, 01:29:17 PM
Help me with a nagging Exchange problem!  I have a client whose mail is syncing fine between the server, her Outlook and her iPhone.  Except that when she reads a mail in one, it still shows up as new in Outlook or the iPhone.  Webmail is seeing that they have been read, but not passing that information along to anything else.  What gives?

Relevant specs:
Exchange Server 2010 running on Small Business Server 2011 x64
Outlook 2010
Not sure which version of the iPhone, unfortunately


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on May 20, 2014, 03:19:04 PM
Web mail is reading from the server, whereas the Outlook and iPhone are downloading the messages to the device itself.  The state of being read is going to be particular to the device reading it.  I'm not sure there's  solution for this if they're going to be using all devices simultaneously.  

At least, that's my understanding of it.  My father-in-law had the exact same issue, and that explanation seemed to suffice for him.

disclaimer: I don't do this for a living.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 20, 2014, 03:24:20 PM
With IMAP the read/unread status gets sync'd up on the server but who the fuck knows what Microsoft is doing with it's own stuff.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 20, 2014, 05:42:48 PM
Is cached exchange mode turned on in the Outlook desktop client?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on May 21, 2014, 05:50:41 AM
Yes to cached exchange mode.

Rasix, the trick here is that normally, you can tell when an email has been read on another device/webmail.  Exchange shares that information.  In this one instance, however, it's not passing that part along even though it's sending the emails through and deleting them off everything when, say, the phone deletes an email.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 21, 2014, 06:02:32 AM
Have them turn cached exchange mode off on the desktop client and see if that changes any behavior.

Also, did they add the exchange account to their iPhone by selecting the type "Microsoft Exchange" (which uses ActiveSync)?

Sometimes removing and re-adding the account to the phone resolves weird issues.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on May 21, 2014, 06:20:06 AM
Outlook and Webmail shouldn't be having those types of problems.  With the IPhone I'd suggest the wrong type of synch was enabled, but if it's happening between webmail and Outlook, something is very fucked.

You can try turning of cached mode, of course, but that's basically turning outlook into a webmail client at this stage and probably won't be much use, unless it's really not synching THERE either, in which case, I refer you to the very fucked.

Let us know.  We have a lot of Exchange people here and I regularly get shite like this with the 365 stuff due to mobile devices.  Blackberry in particular is the fucking devil.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 21, 2014, 10:29:36 AM
Speaking of Blackberry being the devil, I got an email this morning letting IT pros on campus know that there are 400 devices in the campus BES not seen in over 6 months which are causing huge server load issues because BES checks every device stored in the database sequentially (and I think that may be by creation date  :awesome_for_real:) and waits for it to time out before going on to try the next one. Apparently syncs for the like 12 people left on campus using a Blackberry are behaving more like Phildo's iPhone scenario.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on May 21, 2014, 01:14:01 PM
That's funny, because most of my attempts to Google my issue have resulted in Blackberry forums links.

Update: The issue doesn't happen in cached exchange mode, and in cached mode if Outlook receives the email initially marked as read (ie I read it in the web app while Outlook is closed, before Outlook has seen it at all) then it appears as read.  I'm cleaning the crap out of the associated data files right now.  Rebuilding the profile didn't help.

I feel like there's a deeper exchange setting at fault here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 21, 2014, 03:52:55 PM
So wait, it works when cached exchange mode is on but not when it is off?  :ye_gods:

... I refer you to the very fucked.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on May 22, 2014, 07:26:44 AM
No, I think I wrote that backwards.  The issue happens in cached mode, and doesn't occur in online mode.  Sorry!

We rebooted the server overnight and it doesn't seem to have fixed the issue.  I'm going to chalk it up to some arcane setting being broken and talk to the senior exchange guy here.  This is above my paygrade.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 22, 2014, 04:45:03 PM
Did you delete their OST and PST files in their profile?

Outlook rebuilds them on startup and I have seen some wacky shit because of corrupted OST/PST files.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on May 23, 2014, 11:49:16 AM
I didn't delete the OST, but I did repair the PST file about 8 times in a row.  Still don't think it's localized to Outlook, I think I'm going to need to build the client a fresh exchange profile.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 23, 2014, 04:38:18 PM
Seriously, don't even bother repairing PST/OST files. Nuke the mother fuckers from orbit and have them relaunch outlook. 95% of the shit that used to be only stored in those files is kept on the server now anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on June 28, 2014, 09:18:12 PM
Having a very strange Win7 problem.  For whatever reason, a new SATA cable I applied either borked something on my motherboard or it caused a Windows update to churn.  Regardless, I removed it, and I've removed every other drive and USB connection, but I'm unable to get a system repair disk or the Win 7 install disk to appear.  Black screen every time.

1. put in system repair DVD (made on a 32bit version of Win7; mine is 64bit)
2. find the DVD and 1 SSD that supposed to be c:\ after POST test -- set DVD to boot
3. boot from DVD -- spins alot, DOS progress bar working
4. DVD stops spinning, black screen, nothing appears (No mouse cursor, no keyboard input)

I assume this is a MBR problem, but I can't get the repair disk to get to it.  Any ideas?  I've checked cables etc.  Also, I tried booting from my Win7 64bit install disk but it similarly goes to the Windows progress animation, and then freezes. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 29, 2014, 05:57:42 AM
Make sure your bios/uefi boot mode did not get changed. This sounds suspiciously like what happened when dell replaced a motherboard which we had not set to bios boot like we should have. Would not find a valid windows partition.

Also Check your sata operation mode if it is ahci or legacy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 29, 2014, 10:58:26 AM
Doesn't Windows 7 nuke itself if you change the uefi setting in the bios?  Be careful with that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on June 29, 2014, 04:23:26 PM
Im out of my depth.  This is an ASROCK board with UEFI and the SATA cables were set to IDE.  There's only 2 now connected -- the DVD drive and the one SSD with Win 7 as c:\.  Setting them both to "AHCI" didn't solve the behavior below -- DVD just spins out and things hang and go black after the loading animations. 

So, let's assume the UEFI did get changed -- any advice what to do?  Thanks BTW!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 29, 2014, 11:38:21 PM
Do you have another computer you can use? If so take the hard drive out of the one that's giving you trouble and back it up on the other computer. As for the motherboard BIOS/UEFI you could try doing a factory reset but again back up your hard drive first.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on July 01, 2014, 02:09:45 PM
I need a good recommendation for a camera and mic for making Youtube videos. Ideally a webcam so I can also use it for twitch streaming, but that's not a hard requirement. No idea where to even begin, short of just using my phone for video which seems dumb.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 01, 2014, 03:22:45 PM
Budget, for starters.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on July 01, 2014, 05:34:42 PM
I've no idea what these sorts of things go for. $100-$200ish total seems reasonable; I don't want some $20 webcam that's going to give me shit quality but I'm not making super-serious, try-to-earn-money-from-YT videos either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 02, 2014, 07:31:17 AM
I have more than one URL which leads to a Java app, and these Java apps are of course very particular about the version I am using.  One, in fact, only works with Java 7u51.  My question is: does a thing exist which lets me define a particular Java for a particular URL or app, so that I don't have to go into the java console and disable all the versions except the one I want to use at that moment?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on July 02, 2014, 09:00:20 AM
I've no idea what these sorts of things go for. $100-$200ish total seems reasonable; I don't want some $20 webcam that's going to give me shit quality but I'm not making super-serious, try-to-earn-money-from-YT videos either.

How portable do you need it to be? Is this just for your desk, or do you want to record video to later post to youtube? There's a cheaper GoPro camera for about 200, but that may be overkill.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 02, 2014, 09:34:27 AM
I have more than one URL which leads to a Java app, and these Java apps are of course very particular about the version I am using.  One, in fact, only works with Java 7u51.  My question is: does a thing exist which lets me define a particular Java for a particular URL or app, so that I don't have to go into the java console and disable all the versions except the one I want to use at that moment?
For apps, if it's launching as a JAR file you can specify the path to the version of java you want.  If it's an executable then you'll probably have to set up some environment variables ahead of time, and no telling how it will behave if you have multiple apps at different levels going.

For a web page... you might be SoL.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 02, 2014, 11:15:20 AM
The "web page" is just a front end to miscellaneous Java apps.  I'm not executing any JARs directly, these are apps which come packed in software and firmware updates for appliances or nodes of appliances.  I'm not likely to be able to modify most or any of the apps, but I do use launching URLs which are unique.

Sounds like I'm SOL, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 02, 2014, 11:17:28 AM
Are these using Java Web Start (javaws)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on July 02, 2014, 11:17:47 AM
I've no idea what these sorts of things go for. $100-$200ish total seems reasonable; I don't want some $20 webcam that's going to give me shit quality but I'm not making super-serious, try-to-earn-money-from-YT videos either.

How portable do you need it to be? Is this just for your desk, or do you want to record video to later post to youtube? There's a cheaper GoPro camera for about 200, but that may be overkill.
Just for my desk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 02, 2014, 11:33:40 AM
Are these using Java Web Start (javaws)?

I'm not sure if it's javaws.exe or some other binary.  I'm afeared that I'd need to enable tracing to figure out that (although I can do it).  These are appliances, after all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 02, 2014, 11:50:15 AM
Setup a bunch of different VMs each with a different version of Java? :awesome_for_real: (That's what I used to do to test IE versions)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 02, 2014, 12:04:19 PM
:oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 02, 2014, 02:29:21 PM
Go to a programming forum and make a fuck java in the ear post, when the drones come out to defend it present them with your problem?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 02, 2014, 09:25:40 PM
The confusion continues.  So, I had a SSD reformated to NTFS ready to install Win7 over, but I sense I have more problems upstream.  I have UEFI capable motherboard, and I don't know if the original Win7 SSD install was on BIOS or UEFI (Im learning about these dependencies).  So I assume getting that right is important.

Further complications:  I have ACHI and IDE capable SATA ports, but I don't know which to pick.  The boot up is finding a UEFI and SATA capable DVD player, but only a SATA capable SSD.  Behavior I know get is the DVD drive spins out with animation dying off -- nothing starts.  And this happens even trying to install Ubuntu (just a blank screen with a flashing cursor).

So I assume the problem is picking the right SATA drive, but I don't know why this isn't working.  I mean, it's a clean SSD with a DVD player capable of being found as UEFI or BIOS (only the SSD I guess is BIOS).  Just selecing one or the other for DVD drive is not helping.  HALP!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 03, 2014, 12:53:06 PM
Go to a programming forum and make a fuck java in the ear post, when the drones come out to defend it present them with your problem?

Awesome.  But, who doesn't loathe java?  Everyone I know hates it like hobbitses.

Also fuck UEFI in the ear.

Soln, possibly there are some firmware updates required for mainboard or DVD drive?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on July 03, 2014, 01:18:12 PM
Had a client today experience an issue with converting Word documents to PDF files using Acrobat Elements.  It would stall out about 1/4 of the way through the progress bar for some files, but not others.  Eventually, I worked out that it would work if I changed the font of the documents that aren't working.  The font that didn't work?  Times New Roman.

I'm crazy and there's probably a different/better solution than changing away from one of the most prevalent fonts in the world, right?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 03, 2014, 04:21:40 PM
The confusion continues.  So, I had a SSD reformated to NTFS ready to install Win7 over, but I sense I have more problems upstream.  I have UEFI capable motherboard, and I don't know if the original Win7 SSD install was on BIOS or UEFI (Im learning about these dependencies).  So I assume getting that right is important.

Further complications:  I have ACHI and IDE capable SATA ports, but I don't know which to pick.  The boot up is finding a UEFI and SATA capable DVD player, but only a SATA capable SSD.  Behavior I know get is the DVD drive spins out with animation dying off -- nothing starts.  And this happens even trying to install Ubuntu (just a blank screen with a flashing cursor).

So I assume the problem is picking the right SATA drive, but I don't know why this isn't working.  I mean, it's a clean SSD with a DVD player capable of being found as UEFI or BIOS (only the SSD I guess is BIOS).  Just selecing one or the other for DVD drive is not helping.  HALP!

You have to use AHCI with an SSD for trim support to work. BIOS should be fine for the SSD as long as the motherboard chipset supports AHCI in BIOS mode.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on July 04, 2014, 02:19:13 PM
I upgraded my bios to the right make & model, but now there's no bios splash screen at all.  Just a blank screen, no cursor.  Any ideas?  Call Nerd Herd?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 04, 2014, 07:51:10 PM
Factory reset.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on July 06, 2014, 11:26:48 AM
I'm looking at the Logitech C920 and Blue's Yeti for my video/audio recording combo. Anyone have direct experience with either? Both have great reviews on Amazon and Newegg.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on July 06, 2014, 12:25:15 PM
iphone OS update completely fucks router. Apparently while its updating every other device wired or wifi is booted from the network. Its not a problem because I guess it comes back when the update is completed but wtf is wrong with Apple shit?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on July 20, 2014, 04:05:51 PM
I just built a new machine with a fresh install of Win7-64 Home Premium. I'm in the process of installing utilities, and I've come across a problem.

When I try to run some installs - not all, but some - I get the error "The ordinal 459 could not be located in the dynamic link library urlmon.dll." I could install Adobe Flash, but not Adobe Reader. I could install Firefox, but not WinRAR.

A Google search turned up a handful of general urlmon suggestions that did nothing to resolve my issue. Any ideas?


EDIT: Never mind. I installed a stack of "optional" Win 7 updates, and that seems to have corrected the problem.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on July 23, 2014, 12:52:15 AM
Logitech mice: Is the G400s a worthy successor to the MX518 (greatest mouse ever made)? My MX518 is starting to have problems with the scroll wheel.  :sad:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2014, 01:08:45 AM
Texture is apparently a bit different but otherwise very similar. Unfortunately it doesn't have a tilt-wheel* so I haven't tried it myself.

* That also means the G5 was actually the greatest mouse ever made since it was the same shape and design as the MX 518 but was laser instead of optical and it had a tilt wheel (plus weights if you cared about that sort of thing).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 23, 2014, 07:30:33 AM
I can't speak to the MX518, but I went from a G5 (the greatest mouse ever made) to a G400s recently.  It's like going from an Audi to a Corolla. 

I was trying to save a few bones because the new G5 replacement is like $80, but the added weight and sensitivity to the G5 is missing.  The G400s's cord is so thin that one of my cats will chew through it soon enough, so I'll just splurge for the nice mouse then.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on July 23, 2014, 04:01:25 PM
The G5 replacement is the G500 right? The positioning of the thumb buttons looks different on that compared to the 518/400s.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2014, 04:05:30 PM
Yes the thumb buttons are different. I don't like them cause my thumb hits the lower middle thumb button.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on July 23, 2014, 05:03:26 PM
After three days, my new PC stopped working in pretty much the same way my old one finally did - the monitor doesn't receive any signal from the video card. Judging by sound, it boots fine otherwise.

The monitor works perfectly fine with my PS3. The only old parts in the new machine are drives (1x BD-ROM, 2x HD) and the PSU I bought just two months ago. Is it reasonable to guess that the PSU isn't sending enough power to the card? I can't imagine what else would cause the same problem in two entirely different systems. I think it's putting out more than I need (650w), but if I'm wrong, or it's faulty...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2014, 05:37:07 PM
What CPU does the new one have? If it has an integrated GPU (like an Intel HD Graphics 4600) you could try pulling out the dedicated card and trying the integrated GPU.

Other things to try/check:

* Can you hear the fan(s) on the GPU start up?

* Is the card well seated in the slot? Sadly even in this day and age most motherboard / PCI-e card / case combinations result in GPU cards that don't quite sit properly in the PCI-e slots (usually one end or the other is not all the way seated).

* Did you try a different PCI-e slot?

Edit: or


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on July 23, 2014, 05:42:50 PM
There's no integrated GPU, but there is another PCIe slot I can try if reseating does nothing.

I definitely hear the fans. It's a Radeon R9 270X (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202050), if that's useful.

EDIT: CPU is an i5-4670 Haswell (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116898). The Radeon's power req is listed (rather vaguely) as "500W or greater"


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2014, 05:48:03 PM
What's your power supply model? Are both 6-pin power inputs connected on the card?

Also is your PC hooked up to an UPS that has an Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR)? If not you might want to consider getting one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on July 23, 2014, 05:54:18 PM
PSU is a Corsair RM650 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139054&cm_re=650w_power_supply-_-17-139-054-_-Product). I bought it as a replacement in May, so there shouldn't be too much degradation yet. EDIT: I should probably note that the PSU fan is only supposed to turn on when it's under "medium to high load." I've never seen it turn on.

I'm using both inputs. I don't have a UPS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 23, 2014, 06:02:09 PM
Okay that PS puts out plenty of power on the +12V lines so that wouldn't be the issue (unless the PS is bad), especially since you aren't getting video when the GPU isn't even loaded.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 23, 2014, 06:05:14 PM
The G5 replacement is the G500 right? The positioning of the thumb buttons looks different on that compared to the 518/400s.

I believe the current version is the G500s.  Thing is damn busy looking though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on July 23, 2014, 08:15:04 PM
I don't know if it was reseating the card or swapping the power cable to a different outlet on the PSU, but it's working for now. :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on July 24, 2014, 01:51:59 PM
Ended up going with the 400s. Hopefully it will pass the test.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on July 25, 2014, 02:48:47 PM
Let me know; my MX518 is still holding up well but it can't last forever.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 26, 2014, 01:07:49 AM
I've just had to replace a G500 because it only lasted just over a year. It seemed to develop a stutter, as if it was losing tracking, or as if the DPI was changing randomly. I don't consider one year an acceptable lifespan for a mouse advertised and priced as a premium gaming mouse.

I've replaced it with a Razor Deathadder, which is lovely to use.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 28, 2014, 07:27:29 AM
Is there some quality guide on analyzing BSODs?  Not finding what I want via google.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 29, 2014, 07:26:37 AM
Usually a BSOD is either corrupt/shitty drivers or failing hardware.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 29, 2014, 08:11:47 AM
I'd like to find out which one, if I can.  I'm hoping that a page fault in a non-paged area is a software issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 29, 2014, 11:18:06 AM
What's the non-stack dump portion say?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ingmar on July 29, 2014, 01:31:26 PM
Let me know; my MX518 is still holding up well but it can't last forever.

Thus far it's been fine use-wise. I'm a bit concerned about the cable; it's thinner than the 518's, which makes it more vulnerable to our wire-biting cat, and I saw some reviews complaining that the spot where it attaches to the mouse can sometimes wear out fairly quickly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 29, 2014, 01:42:56 PM
What's the non-stack dump portion say?

the what now

The dump has not yet completed.  I moved it to another hard disk, so I might have one if it does it again.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 29, 2014, 02:20:10 PM
The portion in yellow. (http://forumscdn.tweaktown.com/attachments/asus/5171d1351046809-bsod-bad_pool_header-bsod-0xa-sample-labeled-screen-shot.jpg)  The bit in red probably won't tell you much.  Unless you have the tools to analyze the full stack dump, there's not much need to get the full thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 29, 2014, 02:50:06 PM
PAGE FAULT IN NONPAGED AREA


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 29, 2014, 04:46:21 PM
Potentially bad or failing RAM, but like all 'useful' Windows errors it could be a dozen other things, too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 29, 2014, 07:27:46 PM
If you can, reseat the RAM and see if that helps. Running the diagnostics from the bios boot screen should put you into the memory test if the machine has that option as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 30, 2014, 03:57:24 AM
I ran the W7 memory test, so I'll see if there is a BIOS variant.  I'll also reseat the RAM... eventually.  Ram sticks that unseat themselves are why I leave my rig running all the time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 31, 2014, 08:31:02 AM
Different computer.  Symptom: on first power-on, the CPU fan spins and immediately stops.  Subsequent presses of the mode-control will not power on the fan.  Unplug/plug in the PSU and I can get the fan to spin once more but not again.

I replaced the mobo but since the symptom is the same, that can't be it.  I removed all the other parts, so it has to be CPU or RAM.  Looking for opinions before I buy a new one of either.

Probably the fucking AMD CPU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2014, 09:20:10 AM
Different computer.  Symptom: on first power-on, the CPU fan spins and immediately stops.  Subsequent presses of the mode-control will not power on the fan.  Unplug/plug in the PSU and I can get the fan to spin once more but not again.

I replaced the mobo but since the symptom is the same, that can't be it.  I removed all the other parts, so it has to be CPU or RAM.  Looking for opinions before I buy a new one of either.

Probably the fucking AMD CPU.
Take the motherboard out of the case and try powering it on that way. You may be shorting something. Otherwise it does sound like the CPU.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 31, 2014, 09:28:21 AM
I did that with the previous mobo, since I did that in the past, but I'll try it with the new one before ordering another CPU (if that's what they are still called in the x86 arch).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2014, 09:31:14 AM
AMD calls their CPUs with integrated GPUs "APUs" now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 31, 2014, 09:32:40 AM
You tried a different PSU, too?  I'd lean towards CPU otherwise.  Bad memory just tends to have it lock, but not power off.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 31, 2014, 11:08:51 AM
I didn't try another PSU but I consider it "known working" since it was just dandy with the prior boards.  I may not have another PSU which will work.

EDIT for contemplation of the difference in a "core" and a "CPU/APU" and a "processor board/card".  This is a terminological minefield, I expect, which would require me to have a relatively deep understanding of x86 architecture to be able to use the right words.  I have a pretty OK picture in my head of how Power7 and Power8 work in this regard, not sure what is going on with Intel/AMD chips.  But that's actually why I'm building this (or trying to build it).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on August 06, 2014, 07:10:16 AM
Anyone have print tracking software that works on both Mac and PC they'd recommend?  I'm getting sick of our print services company and looking at firing them and their shitty software.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 08, 2014, 11:56:33 AM
MS Word 2013: The scroll bar goes to sleep after 1-2 seconds and I have to move the pointer to be able to scroll up or down.  Internet search didn't show me anything about disabling this feature.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 09, 2014, 10:02:44 PM
Office 2013 is fucking terrible, full stop. It is a bunch of stupid user interface changes that make things less functional than before. I don't think there is a single change in 2013 that I have seen so far that makes it more user friendly for any task.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on August 10, 2014, 02:00:15 PM
I need a good webcam capture program. The stock Logitech program won't record audio from a different mic, nor in acceptable resolution/framerate/file type.

Edit: I downloaded Debut, which records well. However, the videos won't playback in either VLC or MPC. Sony Vegas reads them fine so I guess it will work, but I like previewing my stuff first. Pic of the error below. Seems to be a codec issue, except I recorded it in Lagarith which I've been using for forever.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on August 10, 2014, 08:47:06 PM
FFSplit or OBS? What do you use to stream?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on August 10, 2014, 08:55:04 PM
Hmm, good call. I use OBS to stream and didn't think about messing with quality settings.

Edit: OBS doesn't actually have a lot of options. Can't change the frame rate, only x264 encoding (there are two greyed-out options, Quick Sync and Nvidia NVENC), only mp4 and flv file formats, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on August 10, 2014, 09:45:00 PM
Pretty sure FFsplit is pretty good about all that stuff. Been a while since I've used it though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Stormwaltz on August 17, 2014, 11:20:28 PM
I don't necessarily need a mechanical, or 16.8 million colors, but after a bottle of Three Philosophers exploded through cork and cage and into to my keyboard, I do need a new backlit.*

I noticed the Rosewill RGB80 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823201071) is currently on sale for $100 on Newegg. Reviews seem generally positive. Anyone here have an experience with it, or an alternate suggestion?



* I bought my now-gummed up Saitek Eclipse II in 2008, and most of the keys are worn-out blobs of color; it has served with honor and distinction.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on August 18, 2014, 11:18:11 AM
Really, everyone needs a mechanical. No idea about that one, but at work I've had the previous model w/10key/MX browns and it's been fine. That one appears to have blues so it will be clicky.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on August 18, 2014, 12:41:12 PM
I noticed the Rosewill RGB80 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823201071) is currently on sale for $100 on Newegg. Reviews seem generally positive. Anyone here have an experience with it, or an alternate suggestion?

Lack of number pad would kill that for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on August 18, 2014, 03:11:06 PM
I've had a G510 for years and love it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: JRave on August 19, 2014, 08:37:49 AM
I had a couple of Rosewill's first attempts into mechanical keyboards the rk-9000s.  First one was great but had Blues so was pretty loud.  I then got their 2nd gen that had other switch options, going for the reds.  It was a great keyboard until the micro usb connection within the keyboard itself failed because of bad soldering.  The one you linked has the usb connection in a different spot, but I would still shy away.

I've since moved onto a CMStorm XT which has been rock solid. As such I would recommend looking into the CM Storm line.  They have couple that had backlights, Trigger, Quickfire Ultimate, and Quickfire TK.  The TK can be found on Amazon for less than $100 in multiple switch types.

http://www.amazon.com/CM-Storm-QuickFire-TK-Mechanical/dp/B00A378L4C

{edit: wrong info}
Apparently both the Trigger and Ultimate are discontinued, and I'm unsure if Coolermaster has plans for anymore backlight keyboards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Numtini on August 21, 2014, 04:01:09 AM
The big thing unique about that Rosewill is it has color adjustable LEDs, which even a year ago when I first bought a mech were things we were told weren't possible. I know Corsair is coming out with one soon, but it seems to be delayed and I think the first generation is red switches only.

I have a Ducky Shine III with pink LEDs and couldn't be happier with it. Plus it has a glowing snake on the spacebar for the year of the snake. mechanicalkeyboards.com has a great selection of weird ass keyboards you won't find elsewhere.

FWIW, my evangelism on mechanical keyboards is because a year ago I was getting extreme cramping and pain in my fingers to the point where I was considering going to a doctor about it and when I switched keyboards, it essentially just plain went away.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on August 21, 2014, 05:43:34 AM
I'm looking for a video capture card to record PS3/PS4, and saw this external one:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B008ZT8QKO/ref=redir_mdp_mobile?qid=1408624296&ref_=lp_284824_1_5&s=pc&sr=1-5

Anyone have any experience with it? If not, any suggestions on which one to go with? External isn't a must; I just thought it would be convenient.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2014, 07:06:43 AM
I just obtained one.  It's super easy to use and works much better than I expected.  Youtube uploads can be done directly from the software.  Works great on a not-so-hot laptop.  Have not tried the streaming function.

I thought there was some way to incorporate XBL chat into your recordings but I haven't figured out that one yet.

Something that I didn't find out until I unboxed it is that the PS3 will not let you record HDMI, but they give you a PS3 component cable with the PVR.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on August 22, 2014, 09:52:50 AM
FWIW, my evangelism on mechanical keyboards is because a year ago I was getting extreme cramping and pain in my fingers to the point where I was considering going to a doctor about it and when I switched keyboards, it essentially just plain went away.

I'm now re-interested in this mostly because of the input lag I'm experiencing in WoT. I once had a mechanical keyboard from Thermaltake, but the keys were WAAAAY too tough to depress (cherry black) and it was essentially a useless thing for gaming unless you had gorilla hands.

Do you have any recommendations for fast response mechanical ones that have the old 'ergo' split keyboard configuration? All of the ones I see have the traditional lay out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 01, 2014, 11:30:35 AM
So, I now apparently have two access points in my house:

1) my Mexican modem with Mexican IP
2) VPN router with US IP

So things work alright with my laptop - I simply swap my wireless connection to the VPN when needed. However, I'm not sure how it will work once I set my desktop up using ethernet. Obviously, I will need to connect to both devices with two network connections. But once that is done, how do I manage which traffic uses which connection?

Most of the time, using the Mexican IP will be fine. However, when I want to watch Netflix, or conduct a transaction needing a US IP, how will that work?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 01, 2014, 11:55:07 PM
Hola Unblocker is your friend, at least for things like Netflix or any time you want an Americanized version of things like that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on September 02, 2014, 06:44:40 AM
I'd be impressed if you could actually stream anything through a VPN on Mexican internet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 02, 2014, 06:26:20 PM
Um, HD Netflix comes right through without a problem on my laptop and iPad.

Any other ideas? I already have the router and service - might as well use it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Shannow on September 03, 2014, 08:00:12 AM
Any suggestions for a good HD recovery specialist in MA? (aka HD maybe completely borked and needs actual physical retrieval). Preferably one that isn't going to cost me 2k.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 05, 2014, 08:41:36 AM
Thinking about finally using a Password Manager of some kind (the free kind) to manage my passwords between my desktops at work and home. I sometimes work from the house too, so I need to be able to share the passwords between the two desktops and maybe my cell phone and tablet. Sell me on either LastPass or Keepass.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 05, 2014, 08:57:24 AM
They both suck (integration with browsers is hard) but they both work OK. Pick your poison.

Personally, I use LastPass.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 05, 2014, 09:15:34 AM
1Password (with Dropbox account).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 05, 2014, 10:34:18 AM
Keepass has never betrayed me.  Have not tried the others.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 05, 2014, 11:38:01 PM
AFAIK Lastpass is the only one that says that if you forget your master key they can't help you, you're boned. I.e. they have no way of accessing your data, which is what makes them the only genuinely secure one. I have a friend who requires some kind of security clearance for his work and he says Lastpass is the one they are told to use.

I find it well worth paying the $12/year for the mobile app too, YMMV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 12, 2014, 07:16:24 PM
So, any suggestions for a new TV?

I'm looking for something snazzy that comes in 60" or so and ships from Amazon. Not sure what the new hotness is, so left to my own devices I'd tend towards a Samsung.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 13, 2014, 05:28:23 AM
Samsung is pretty much the way to go for the most part.  If you are spending that kind of money (60 inch kind), then just go ahead and get the 4k Samsung.  It is very unlikely you would regret it.

I have the 2013 version of the 55 inch 4k TV.  It is sweet, even with absolutely zero 4k content being displayed on it.

Note:  if getting 4k content on it is important to you in the near term, make sure you get a 2014 version.  The older versions require a physical upgrade of the separate box that comes with the TV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 13, 2014, 08:22:01 AM
I'm not even sure where I would get 4K content - I'm pretty much only gong to be doing Blurays, Netflix, PS4, and other streaming options on it.

I just want a nice TV, finally.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 13, 2014, 03:43:25 PM
Wait a month then go look at a Vizio P series 4k TV (http://www.vizio.com/p-series) if you like what you see get that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 14, 2014, 10:51:18 PM
I'm not even sure where I would get 4K content - I'm pretty much only gong to be doing Blurays, Netflix, PS4, and other streaming options on it.

I just want a nice TV, finally.

Even so, the 4k TV at that size will be the best TV you can get and I doubt the cost difference is huge anymore (if they even make a non 4k TV at that size).  And as has been the case for all intents over the last nearly 10 years, Samsung is the way to go.  You said snazzy, so I assume you are not going after a budget model.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on September 15, 2014, 09:09:24 AM
Are you sure you have room for 60"? At 42" inches, my TV seems just perfect for ~6-8ft away.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 15, 2014, 11:52:26 AM
When sizing replacement Intel machines, seems like there would be some sort of calculator or at least an estimator which would let me know approximately how many modern Intel cores I would need in order to replace a number of Intel cores from six years ago.  Anyone know of something like that?  It doesn't need to be a tool; an algorithm or table would be better than what I'm doing right now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 18, 2014, 04:41:46 AM
I just use the CPU ranking website to look at relative rankings between old and new processor models. I will dig up the link when I get to a computer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2014, 06:31:24 AM
That would be nice.  Although after a very short discussion with a VMware engineer, I'm probably going to be bringing F1-mechanic ideas to a Chevy repair shop.  I'm going to see how many ESX classes I can cram in this year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 18, 2014, 08:18:05 AM
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/index.php (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/index.php) Is the ranking website I use, should work for what you need. Vaguely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2014, 08:41:04 AM
Apparently "vaguely" is all I need.  :uhrr:  Stupid Intel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on September 18, 2014, 08:49:37 PM
I think this may be a quick question:

Have been keeping a friends' kid's PC alive for a bit. It's good hardware, a bit dated, but does what he needs very well. In Feb replaced PSU, in April the GPU and HD.

Recently he started getting what seemed like random BSODs. I narrowed it down (I thought) to a burned out wifi card (I personally don't get wifi and desktop gaming PCs, but YMMV). Removed that, returned it, had them run ethernet, didn't hear from them for a few days. Ran into them and turns out it's still BSODing. Computer turns on fine, but no matter what he's doing, about three minutes after the desktop fully loads, it bluescreens.

Wiped the drive, everything's fine. Works like a charm. Until I plug in the ethernet cable. Then it hangs for a few seconds and goes blue.

I'm thinking it's something corrupted on the motherboard related to the networking parts, and that sounds like a new mobo. $150 for a new board and they're fine with that, but would rather know.

This sound familiar to anyone?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 18, 2014, 08:54:57 PM
Take a picture of the BSoD and post it here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 19, 2014, 06:26:15 AM
If it's only the ethernet that's fried you could also consider getting a network card if there are any free expansion slots.  (Though screenshot as Trippy asks might tell us more.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 20, 2014, 11:04:59 AM
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/index.php (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/index.php) Is the ranking website I use, should work for what you need. Vaguely.

That is the site I use as well. Intel is very coy on what the actual performance gains are between generations. Basically I have come to the conclusion that for most cases for VMware hosts the following guidelines are good for choosing processors:

This is, of course, dependent on what price point you are wanting to hit:

1) RAM is almost without fail going to be your capacity bottleneck, not CPU power.
2) Always plan on 2-sockets (since licensing for most things comes in 2-socket increments + rule 1, in 2 years of running VMware clusters with dozens of guests per host I have only once run into CPU issues and that was an isolated case due to a poorly coded SQL job that needed tons of cores to complete in less than 36 hours.)
3) Get the biggest on-die cache you can afford
4) Buy higher clock rates if you can,  but buy the most cores you can per socket
   *rule 4 caveat for MSSQL host-based licensing: if you are building boxes to be dedicated hosts for MSSQL servers to save on per-machine licensing, get as much speed as you can out of fewer cores as they charge per CPU core on the host so it gets pricy fast even with good volume agreements.
5) VMware recommends leaving Hyper-threading on in all of their documentation, so your number of vCPUs will be double the number of physical cores.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 20, 2014, 09:58:49 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations for video conversion software?

I'm recording Elite: Dangerous in 1440p and want to shrink the files down without crushing the quality. Fraps is the only thing I've found that records without killing my PC but it makes HUGE files. There are a vast number of free video conversion programs but I have no idea which are a) any good and b) not stuffed with malware. I also know nothing about good ways to compress video.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 20, 2014, 11:17:51 PM
https://handbrake.fr/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 21, 2014, 01:17:15 AM
Cool, testing now, thank you.

Oh that works like a charm. Cheers! High res Elite videos coming soon :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 21, 2014, 02:37:07 PM
Anyone have any ideas on why it seems like whenever I watch Netflix from a Mexican IP vs US IP, it seems I get more choices from Mexico? Example - I cannot watch season 5 of Archer from a US IP, but I can from a Mexican one.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on September 21, 2014, 03:04:23 PM
Less copyright restrictions probably.  Canadian Netflix tends to have even fewer shows than the US.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 21, 2014, 03:36:47 PM
Licensing agreements for music, television, and movies are all done by country (sometimes region). Depending on the locale, it may be easier to get things than the U.S. because there is no cable/broadcast channel that airs the show and thus has exclusive rights for a certain length of time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on September 21, 2014, 08:06:20 PM
I

I'm thinking it's something corrupted on the motherboard related to the networking parts, and that sounds like a new mobo. $150 for a new board and they're fine with that, but would rather know.

This sound familiar to anyone?

I'm a few days late to this tech support party, but have you ran memtest to check the RAM?

What you are describing could very well be bad memory, except for the ethernet part, which might just be coincidence.

Anyway, check it before you get a whole new motherboard and stick bad memory back into it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on September 21, 2014, 11:04:16 PM
Anyone have any ideas on why it seems like whenever I watch Netflix from a Mexican IP vs US IP, it seems I get more choices from Mexico? Example - I cannot watch season 5 of Archer from a US IP, but I can from a Mexican one.  :uhrr:

I tried to clue you in a page or two ago, but maybe I was being too vague.

If you are using a PC, you want to go download a little plugin thingy called Hola Unblocker.  Takes less than a minute.  It will magically transport you to the US version of pretty much everything your little heart desires.  Or any other country that it happens to support.  It is absolutely brilliant for people like us who want the US content from foreign IPs.  It will also get you around that "this video not available in your country" thing.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 22, 2014, 06:01:59 AM
This is, of course, dependent on what price point you are wanting to hit:

1) RAM is almost without fail going to be your capacity bottleneck, not CPU power.
2) Always plan on 2-sockets (since licensing for most things comes in 2-socket increments + rule 1, in 2 years of running VMware clusters with dozens of guests per host I have only once run into CPU issues and that was an isolated case due to a poorly coded SQL job that needed tons of cores to complete in less than 36 hours.)
3) Get the biggest on-die cache you can afford
4) Buy higher clock rates if you can,  but buy the most cores you can per socket
   *rule 4 caveat for MSSQL host-based licensing: if you are building boxes to be dedicated hosts for MSSQL servers to save on per-machine licensing, get as much speed as you can out of fewer cores as they charge per CPU core on the host so it gets pricy fast even with good volume agreements.
5) VMware recommends leaving Hyper-threading on in all of their documentation, so your number of vCPUs will be double the number of physical cores.

Fortunately, I'm not bothered by cost.

The way it works for this customer (and many others) is that there is a standard hardware BOM so there isn't any decision to be made with your points unless there is some additional requirement that manages to exceed the standard.  Using a standard will cut out a lot of work and streamline deployments, provided you do enough of them.  Also standards are good.

At the moment my choice of frames is set in stone, so really all I need to do is figure out how many vcpu to assign to a VM which will take over for a physical Intel frame with eight cores.  The VM engineer said to just assign two vcpu, that works in 95% of the cases.  I find that to be very sloppy but I don't seem to have a lot of tools and I also don't want to spend a huge amount of effort for something that won't matter in the end.  Not this time, anyway.  I asked questions about processor entitlements and pool capping, which seemed to confuse him.

Interestingly, anything with a database (Oracle and sometimes RAC in this case) and this client will insist on a physical machine.  Whatever, it's their money.  Although there might be reasons for this in ESX-land, which is why I want to read up on it.  But you hit on one reason I want a granular approach.  I can tell someone, based on perf metrics from a workload, how many fractional Power cores will be needed and calculate license costs from that.  Easy with IBM equipment, apparently trial-and-error or overallocate-and-pray with Intel equipment.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on September 22, 2014, 07:08:45 AM
I've got an SSD that has started to vanish after 45-90 min of uptime -- both windows and the bios can't see it until I turn off the computer for 10-15 min.  Is this an overheating issue that I can solve or is the drive failing?

If I do need to replace the drive, what is the modern equivalent of Norton Ghost?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 22, 2014, 07:32:51 AM
Ghost is still a thing, but not sure where to get it.  I just hear the Winders engineers talk about it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on September 22, 2014, 07:50:17 AM
My Samsung 830 ssd came with a copy of ghost.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on September 22, 2014, 07:59:06 AM
For VMware, always start with as few cores as possible and see if you are getting resource starved. The way the CPU scheduler works, you want as few cores as possible because for a job to be cleared all cores allocated to the guest must be free on the host for it to run (even if it is a tiny task) so a guest with 8 cores allocated will always have to wait until 8 cores are free to get CPU time on the host.

Father Mike: Arconis true image is pretty much the consumer equivalent of ghost that cones with a lot of SSD drives now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on September 22, 2014, 08:18:27 AM
Thanks for the replies, folks.  I guess I'm off to newegg. 

Worse than the replacement cost is not having my main box while the new drive is in shipping.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 22, 2014, 09:23:18 AM
I've got an SSD that has started to vanish after 45-90 min of uptime -- both windows and the bios can't see it until I turn off the computer for 10-15 min.  Is this an overheating issue that I can solve or is the drive failing?

If I do need to replace the drive, what is the modern equivalent of Norton Ghost?
It would be hard for an SSD to overheat itself (2 watts is about the max an SSD will draw). However there may be something else within your comp that's overheating like your CPU or GPU. You should run a temp monitoring tool to narrow down what it might be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on September 22, 2014, 09:51:38 AM
I use SpeedFan to check my internals every so often.  It gives me blue 'down arrows' (which i have always taken to mean "below expected") on everything except AUX, which is green.  I suspected for a moment that AUX might be one of the motherboard bridges, and it was overheating and not transferring data from the drive, but I believe the MB system checks would shut down before they'd let things get that critical.

The problem is, this drive is my boot drive, so when it goes away, the system crashes.  If it is failing, I want to preserve whatever life it has left.   So I'm not inclined to run it just to tinker/troubleshoot until I get it imaged over.  Once I get it imaged, then I'll poke at it, or let it run so I can examine the failure state more closely.

The reason I suspected overheating was the obscene amount of dust and cat fur in the case (go-go canned air and mini-vac!).  It is shocking how much that has built up in just over a year.  As long as I'm asking for advice, does anyone have good experiences with a HEPA-type room air filter for managing dust, etc. in an office area?  The room is a finished basement, in a house with two cats.  Yeah, I quickly googled it, but the results are all over the map on price and efficacy claims.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 22, 2014, 09:55:49 AM
For VMware, always start with as few cores as possible and see if you are getting resource starved. The way the CPU scheduler works, you want as few cores as possible because for a job to be cleared all cores allocated to the guest must be free on the host for it to run (even if it is a tiny task) so a guest with 8 cores allocated will always have to wait until 8 cores are free to get CPU time on the host.

Wow.  Good to know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on September 22, 2014, 12:50:23 PM


The reason I suspected overheating was the obscene amount of dust and cat fur in the case (go-go canned air and mini-vac!).  It is shocking how much that has built up in just over a year.  As long as I'm asking for advice, does anyone have good experiences with a HEPA-type room air filter for managing dust, etc. in an office area?  The room is a finished basement, in a house with two cats.  Yeah, I quickly googled it, but the results are all over the map on price and efficacy claims.

I've found that running HEPAs actually kicks up more dust and hair, so I end up cleaning the PC more than leaving fans off.  My new routine is to sweep the floor twice a week and run the HEPA for an hour or two after sweeping, then turn it off until I sweep again.  YMMV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 22, 2014, 09:57:20 PM
Anyone have any ideas on why it seems like whenever I watch Netflix from a Mexican IP vs US IP, it seems I get more choices from Mexico? Example - I cannot watch season 5 of Archer from a US IP, but I can from a Mexican one.  :uhrr:

I tried to clue you in a page or two ago, but maybe I was being too vague.

If you are using a PC, you want to go download a little plugin thingy called Hola Unblocker.  Takes less than a minute.  It will magically transport you to the US version of pretty much everything your little heart desires.  Or any other country that it happens to support.  It is absolutely brilliant for people like us who want the US content from foreign IPs.  It will also get you around that "this video not available in your country" thing.

I think you believe I have a problem I don't actually have - I have access to both Mexican and US IPs.

The ONLY issue is that, for whatever reason, on my Mexican IP I cannot use Netflix on the laptop because it says I cannot stream from my location...though my tablet and phone are able to with the "Mexican" selection.

The question was more just because it seemed bizarre to me (though makes sense now, vis-a-vis lack of exclusive broadcast conflicts in MX).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on September 23, 2014, 06:06:23 PM
I set up a pair of HEPA filters for a client's printer setup, the dyesub printers are quite sensitive to dust and hair. Worked like a charm.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on September 24, 2014, 09:50:41 AM
Father Mike: Arconis true image is pretty much the consumer equivalent of ghost that cones with a lot of SSD drives now.

Wound up going with Clonezilla.  The Samsung software wouldn't copy the master boot record nor make the cloned drive bootable.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on September 28, 2014, 04:40:23 PM
Wait a month then go look at a Vizio P series 4k TV (http://www.vizio.com/p-series) if you like what you see get that.

Holy shit, the 70 inch one is only $2,499? Goddamnit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on September 28, 2014, 07:02:26 PM
Ended up going with this purty one:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IN2WIXY/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IN2WIXY/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1)

I'll have to let people know how it goes when it gets here in a few weeks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 16, 2014, 08:11:22 AM
Acrobat Pro character recognition and conversion is not 100% awesome.  Is there some other product that works well to create searchable text from scans?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 16, 2014, 09:56:46 AM
Acrobat Pro character recognition and conversion is not 100% awesome.  Is there some other product that works well to create searchable text from scans?
I wish you were right but you are wrong, when compared to the competition Adobe is 100% awesome when it comes to OCR.  The exceptions might be found baked in to some expensive enterprise document management systems but I doubt it even then.  A few years ago I tried out OCRopus (back when it was based on tesseract) and it was not fun.  Since then the OCRopus folks have decided to roll their own and it has not yet caught up to what tesseract was capable of.

edit - In the event that I am full of shit please be posting your findings here as I would love nothing more than to eliminate any current or future dependence I may have on Adobe products.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 16, 2014, 10:26:10 AM
Reality accepted: 90%

I'll post back if I find something better than Acrobat Pro.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on October 16, 2014, 10:51:24 AM
Reality accepted: 90%

I'll post back if I find something better than Acrobat Pro.

There is better than acrobat pro but it is another Adobe solution geared towards bulk OCR (think of it as Acrobat Pro - the server edition).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 16, 2014, 07:25:17 PM
ABBYY FineReader is the best OCR I have seen. It is not that cheap though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on October 17, 2014, 07:56:40 AM
Interesting, I've seen that on some of my clients' machines, but none of them seem to know what it is or why they have it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 20, 2014, 08:06:33 AM
I believe I need to use DNS servers that do not belong to AT+T.  I used OpenDNS a number of years ago, but not sure if they are still preferred.  Any suggestions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 20, 2014, 08:31:00 AM
I'm currently using DNS Made Easy (http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/) for my stuff. Simple, cheap, no problems.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 20, 2014, 08:41:07 AM
Actually I just need to direct my home router to some DNS server that isn't the ones supplied by my ISP, and I think DNS Made Easy is overkill.  Unless this is the world we live in now... I haven't looked into non-ISP-provided DNS service in a number of years.

Occasionally, name resolution anywhere on my home LAN takes close to or over 1000 milliseconds.  This is a large pain.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 20, 2014, 09:11:04 AM
I believe I need to use DNS servers that do not belong to AT+T.  I used OpenDNS a number of years ago, but not sure if they are still preferred.  Any suggestions?
Use Google if you don't mind them knowing even more about you than they already do: 8.8.8.8


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 20, 2014, 09:19:05 AM
Ah misunderstood the DNS question. Yeah Google DNS servers are probably a good option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 20, 2014, 10:10:39 AM
My credit card is stolen every four to six months already, so I suppose Google is fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on October 20, 2014, 11:01:41 AM
I have my ISP as my primary and Google as my secondary.  Generally works pretty well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 20, 2014, 12:39:12 PM
I decided to not do anything difficult like split my network by starting up DHCP on one of the routers set to use alternate DNS... I just changed the DNS settings on my PC and the PS4.  If that fixes things, I'll gradually do this on the other networked equipments.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 21, 2014, 11:36:01 AM
Anyone know how to completely remove history/cache/cookies/location services from an iPad?

It's running iOS 8.1, but turning off location services, clearing history, cookies and data from the Settings is still retaining a local zip code for a website I'm viewing.  I can't figure out how it's pulling that information, it shouldn't do that from my wireless connection, I hope.

Weird.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 21, 2014, 11:42:32 AM
Anyone know how to completely remove history/cache/cookies/location services from an iPad?

It's running iOS 8.1, but turning off location services, clearing history, cookies and data from the Settings is still retaining a local zip code for a website I'm viewing.  I can't figure out how it's pulling that information, it shouldn't do that from my wireless connection, I hope.

Weird.
Are you on Wi-Fi? Sites can guess your ZIP code by IP address.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 21, 2014, 11:47:51 AM
That's what I figured. 

It's adding the zip as text into the input field on the site, which effectively is bypassing any type of "do not track" tools the ipad has.  Which is only a problem when the users can actually see the information we're collecting.

Thanks Trippy, that was helpful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 21, 2014, 01:27:20 PM
A trial last night seems to indicate that changing the DNS servers in my PS4 has eliminated all of the ass that I was getting while trying to play Destiny.  Seems to have fixed up the PC as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on October 24, 2014, 06:02:36 AM
Met with Marketing for next year's planning yesterday. They're looking for a hosted solution that also does page management because we don't do enough to keep a fulltime web dev employed. Sort of a one-stop shop that will take responsibility for both uptime and page templates, etc.

Our current guys are middlemen who push hosting out to Rackspace and therefore are really just taking our money since they always claim any problems are Rackspace's fault.

Any suggestions from the peanut gallery?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 24, 2014, 06:24:24 AM
Thoroughly read the contract before you sign it. :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on October 24, 2014, 07:58:29 AM
Thoroughly read the contract before you sign it. :why_so_serious:

They're just looking for suggestions from us, already leaning towards Rackspace.Marketing will sign it.

So you already know THAT outcome.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 24, 2014, 08:50:15 AM
As far as I know, Rackspace is the de facto cloud provider that isn't Amazon.  However I have no experience with their services since they are a competitor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 24, 2014, 09:16:23 AM
I am a bit confused by your request as it sounds like you were asking about hosted web platforms with all the CMS bells and whistles but then you sound like you moved into just plain old cloud hosting of website data you already have.

I am sure there are dozens of MSPs out there that could do what exactly you are looking for in either respect. (At a minimum)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on October 24, 2014, 09:49:39 AM
We use Rackspace, Microsoft azure and Amazon AWS here at work. Rackspace is not the cheapest solution but our up time has been pretty impressive and I haven't honestly had any issues. No idea why you are looking at them though if you are just doing a simple CMS style site. Because almost any hosting company can handle that. Just don't go with the el-cheapo outfits and you will be fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on October 24, 2014, 03:26:24 PM
Sort of a one-stop shop that will take responsibility for both uptime and page templates, etc.
Do those exist? My impression is that most actual hosting providers aren't going to touch your site beyond making sure that it is connected to the internet and maybe is generating HTTP 200's, so you'd need a middleman, but I could be entirely wrong.

In any case, I happen to be a support troll for a managed hosting provider that caters to a lot of small-to-medium businesses without their own IT departments, so if you like the idea of me being the guy responsible for not fucking up your website, PM me. :why_so_serious:

I don't go near the sales guys so I have no idea how we compare to Rackspace economically.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on October 26, 2014, 09:00:32 PM
I am a bit confused by your request as it sounds like you were asking about hosted web platforms with all the CMS bells and whistles but then you sound like you moved into just plain old cloud hosting of website data you already have.

I am sure there are dozens of MSPs out there that could do what exactly you are looking for in either respect. (At a minimum)

Hey, good, you're as understanding of it as I am then.  I asked because I know a lot of you do web monkeying, I'm not the lead and we were only being 'consulted' on it because we're doing annual planning.

We launched a "new" website last year and evidently the design company we used is all proprietary template-based. One of the requirements was that it be easy to update with no tinkering, just upload articles to a site via wordpress and have them drop in. So now that they're realizing, hey, we're paying these guys to be middlemen and they're not doing anything for us it's been decided to start looking elsewhere.  However, since the templates were proprietary they're not sure we'll get the site if we move.

God forbid you ever involve your IT department in any tech issues prior to making decisions.  No, you're supposed to run to them the day before a marketing initiative or trade show. Long after decisions about things have been made and you can't figure out why you can't get your iPhone to stream videos to your PC and 4 TVs at the same time over the convention center wireless.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 27, 2014, 09:39:44 AM
Rabbit not appearing from hat, go find the magician.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on October 27, 2014, 10:35:24 AM
I love when a project is planned, budgeted, approved and funded before I'm involved. It doesn't happen too often, but often enough that it makes me crazy. If you have not consulted the person actually responsible for purchasing and installing the relevant stuff, your budget (and possibly the entire project) is completely fabricated from wishes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on October 27, 2014, 12:43:25 PM
IT is just support, they aren't actively involved in "The Real Work."

 :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on October 30, 2014, 05:33:10 PM
Have a tech neophyte with a Windows 7 Lenovo laptop and a Sony Bravia he wants to wireless mirror his screen too, and he's got an Apple TV and Chromecast. Chromecast only does Chrome browser (I haven't had luck gettin the "experimental" share whole screen to work), so I was thinking Apple TV with AirServer (http://www.airserver.com/).

Anyone have a better idea?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 30, 2014, 05:40:07 PM
If the laptop has WiDi he could use a WiDi receiver:

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/connect-mobile-device-tv-wireless.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on October 30, 2014, 07:15:59 PM
Wow, interesting, I'll see if his TV is compatible. Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 10, 2014, 08:35:13 AM
So I want to increase the memory in my PC and, as ever, am slightly confused about the options.

Motherboard is an Asus P6T and the memory section of the manual says:
Quote
• A*: Supports two (2) modules inserted into slot A1 and B1 as one pair of Dual-channel memory configuration
• B*: Supports three (3) modules inserted into the orange slots (A1, B1 and C1) as one set of Triple-channel memory configuration
• C*: Supports four (4) modules inserted into the orange slots (A1, B1 and C1) and the black slot A2 as one set of Triple-channel memory configuration
• D*: Supports six (6) modules inserted into both the orange slots and the black slots as two set of Triple-channel memory configuration

Currently it's got 6Gb installed like this:

So, should I get 2x8Gb or 3x4Gb DDR3 1066MHz? Will 12Gb in 3 sticks as triple channel have any benefits over 16Gb in 2 sticks as double channel?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 10, 2014, 08:47:40 AM
I would get 3x4gb and purchase a set that is advertised as triple channel ram.  I would guess that memory advertised as not triple channel ram would work fine as well but personally I would just bite the bullet as long as you are fine with a 12gb upgrade vs a 16gb upgrade it actually comes out to be cheaper.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 10, 2014, 09:16:27 AM
Brilliant, thanks Salamok.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 10, 2014, 05:09:19 PM
I have a similar Asus board, I opted to pull the triple channel 6gb and dropped 2 8gb sticks in. Works fine, and was cheaper at the time than 3 decent 4gb sticks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 10, 2014, 11:21:16 PM
Oh well, I ordered the 3x4Gb ones now! Prices were pretty much identical either way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 11, 2014, 09:30:09 AM
Since you will soon have two 3-channel kits you could just slot the new ones into the open slots and get 18 gb.  (Or reverse them.  Too busy to look at exact specs to see which is better for your board.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 11, 2014, 11:07:48 AM
Zomg really? Awesome  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 11, 2014, 12:11:27 PM
I've been trying to figure this one out since the picture made it look like there were 3x6GB modules installed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 11, 2014, 01:03:02 PM
It's a kit, so total 6 gb, but really three sticks of 2 gb each.  Thus the 6 (3x2).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 11, 2014, 06:58:57 PM
Any particular suggestions on a wifi adapter for a PC? I'd rather not have to add in a card, so I've been looking at the USB adapters. Is there any particular drawback to be aware of besides an uptick in latency and (as far as I can tell, inconsequential) lower bandwidth versus ethernet?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on November 11, 2014, 07:04:17 PM
I fondly remember some games just not fucking working with a wireless PC card.  Good luck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on November 11, 2014, 07:35:00 PM
Eh, I just need to occasionally swap networks, though since my routers are right here I could just move the cable between the two as needed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 11, 2014, 07:45:42 PM
Any particular suggestions on a wifi adapter for a PC? I'd rather not have to add in a card, so I've been looking at the USB adapters. Is there any particular drawback to be aware of besides an uptick in latency and (as far as I can tell, inconsequential) lower bandwidth versus ethernet?
Try to get one that's made by the same manufacturer of your wireless router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 11, 2014, 10:09:54 PM
I just got whatever was cheap and hoped for the best. Ok so far.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 12, 2014, 03:04:02 AM
It's a kit, so total 6 gb, but really three sticks of 2 gb each.  Thus the 6 (3x2).

Yep, this :)

The new 12gb kit just arrived, so I've plugged them in (after 10 fruitless minutes of trying to get them in the wrong way round). Only 12Gb is showing though, the original 6Gb kit isn't appearing any more.

I'm not overly bothered if I can't make both sets work together but it'd be nice. Any ideas what I can try to make it happen?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on November 12, 2014, 07:26:19 AM
It's possible the board doesn't support the full 18 gb, or the order needs to be switched, or gods know what.

Do the sticks register in BIOS?  Memory isn't something I futz around with in great detail, so I can't offer much more without doing some serious research.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 12, 2014, 08:04:13 AM
Nah the BIOS is only picking up 12Gb. TBH I really am not concerned, 12Gb is plenty, Minecraft is using all it possibly can now ;)  I was just wondering if there was something obvious, but I cba to futz with it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 12, 2014, 09:12:41 AM
Only suggestion is to check your MB manual.  BIOS is complicated these days.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 12, 2014, 09:48:21 AM
May have to manually set the memory speed and timings.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 12, 2014, 09:52:39 AM
I had a poke around in the BIOS timings section. Got confused. Backed away. 12Gb is fine.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 12, 2014, 10:17:15 AM
May have to manually set the memory speed and timings.

Looking back, seems he is mixing clock speeds; 1333MHz old, 1066MHz new.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 12, 2014, 10:22:03 AM
Looking back, seems he is mixing clock speeds; 1333MHz old, 1066MHz new.

Other way round, didn't notice until I'd ordered.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 12, 2014, 10:28:34 AM
Dusty pic shows 1333MHz?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on November 12, 2014, 11:02:37 AM
Sorry, yeah, the new stuff is 1600Mhz. Also it's less dusty in there now. Slightly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 13, 2014, 12:16:18 PM
Any particular suggestions on a wifi adapter for a PC?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833704045

Been on my machine for a couple years now and I like it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 27, 2014, 10:32:58 PM
Is a mechanical keyboard that great?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 28, 2014, 08:52:46 AM
They are generally more durable than keyboards with cheap ass dome switches and some people like the feel of certain mechanical switches.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on November 28, 2014, 08:56:13 AM
Is a mechanical keyboard that great?

Depends on if you use them or if someone in the same room as you uses them. The build quality is usually better and some users prefer the more "heavy" and mechanical action. They are fucking obnoxious though because they are generally much louder.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 30, 2014, 03:00:46 PM
Is a mechanical keyboard that great?

Depends on if you use them or if someone in the same room as you uses them. The build quality is usually better and some users prefer the more "heavy" and mechanical action. They are fucking obnoxious though because they are generally much louder.

Lol basically my feelings exactly, I loved my old school mechanicals (enough to have a small stash of spares) the wife however banned them from the house about 10 years ago.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on December 23, 2014, 08:33:23 PM
Anybody messed around with triple-monitor setups for gaming? Where you take three identical resolution flat panels and configure them to work like a single (really wide) monitor?

I'm currently debating between getting 3 cheap monitors (probably 4:3), 2 1080p (match my current laptop screen), or just saying "screw it" and springing for the 21:9 2560x1080 ultrawidescreen. The first is cheapest and would put the least strain on my video card (I would probably get 1024x768), the second is easier but is pushing a hell of a lot of pixels, and the third is pricy (starting around $400) but only 28% more pixels and as easy as just plugging it in.

Just finding that I *really* need better peripheral vision in MWO. Anyone out there already tried any of these? Better yet, more than one and can tell me how they actually compare?

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 30, 2014, 04:08:46 PM
No experience but off the top of my head it occurs to me that finding 4:3 aspect ratio monitors is gonna be a pain. Also, monitors that old probably have thick bezels that would cut down on immersion.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 30, 2014, 06:31:11 PM
Our old house still is mostly made of lath and plaster, and we've got a few obstructions in the house that are preventing a solid wireless signal from making it upstairs.  I'm thinking about wiring the house up for the TV and the upstairs computers.  I'm currently looking at running from the modem to a 4 port wireless router, then from that router to the TV area and three other PCs in various areas of the house. 

Should I invest in Cat6 at this point?

How do I handle the TV area, which has three devices (PS3, Wii, something extra)?  Do I run three dedicated lines up there, or can I use a switch in the TV area to split a single line to the three devices?

Any recommendations on setup and/or gear for this are welcomed!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 30, 2014, 06:39:01 PM
A switch is fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2014, 07:10:59 PM
Should I invest in Cat6 at this point?

To go with Cat6 vs Cat5e really comes down to price more than anything for home wiring, if you can get Cat6 for close to the same price you might as well go with Cat6. Cat5e will get you gigabit ethernet and is somewhat easier to work with. In a house you are not going to run into the crosstalk situations you would run into in a typical structured cabling setup where a large number of cables are running parallel in close proximity that Cat6 is really designed to mitigate so your performance difference is probably not even going to be noticable.

I went with Cat5e when I wired my house after I bought it mainly because I could get it in a siamese cable with RG-6Q coax (http://www.summitsource.com/steren-772wh-structured-composite-cable-quad-shielded-siamese-cat5e-data-video-pair-coaxial-cable-white-combo-multimedia-wall-coaxial-network-cable-part-300772-p-8830.html) for cheap. (Got a 300' roll for like 120 bucks when I bought it). I have everything running to an 8-port patch panel and coax splitter attached to the wall in my furnace closet. I have a trendnet 5 port gigabit switch on my TV stand that all my entertainment devices plug into. Each room has a single wall plate with a cable jack and an ethernet port on it.

Overall I spent about 250 bucks and about 10 hours pulling wire to get it all set up but it is definitely worth it.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on December 30, 2014, 10:08:10 PM
Did you look at/try the power line Ethernet adapters? In theory, you could plug one in by your main router, add a Cat 5 between the router and adapter, put another wall adapter upstairs, plug another wifi router (bridge mode) into that adapter. Not sure how well they work - I have a pair but haven't tried them out yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 31, 2014, 01:16:43 AM
My buddy had pretty good success with his.  It's a good idea to try out, and cheaper than running cable.  My only concern was that the electrical in this old house is not in great shape.  We've got only a small panel and it's running knob+tube, romex and armored cable all out of it.  I don't know how adding that power line adapter would affect the electrical and I'm not sure I want to test it.  Good idea, though.

Current plan is to pay off the $9k we just put into the new sewer line by summer, then do the electrical after. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 31, 2014, 01:46:24 AM
I can vouch for the powerline networking stuff, it's really good. Our house is 110 years old with 1m thick walls that kill wifi dead. Our wiring is a mish-mash of 40 year old fuck-knows-what-regulations-applied stuff and recently redone sections. We got a couple of powerline adapters and they're great.

Only problem area is what we call the workshop, which is a separate building with it's own consumer unit, basically on a completely different main from the house.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 31, 2014, 09:41:04 AM
I have two breaker panels in my house and so I basically got lucky in finding two electrical outlets on the same bar which were in places I needed them.  My upstairs office is using it to connect two PCs to the downstairs router nest.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on December 31, 2014, 12:09:05 PM
I'm in the market for a 24 or 27 inch monitor that's good for gaming yet has IPS quality viewing angles and color gamut. I know that Asus is coming out with an expensive 10 bit IPS 5 ms  response time monitor in the next month or so, but I'm gonna poke here if anyone has a had a good buy recently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: CaptainNapkin on December 31, 2014, 04:36:42 PM
Are you folks with powerline all using the NetGear stuff or a different brand? Been wanting to try this, hate running wire.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 31, 2014, 10:03:44 PM
I'm in the market for a 24 or 27 inch monitor that's good for gaming yet has IPS quality viewing angles and color gamut. I know that Asus is coming out with an expensive 10 bit IPS 5 ms  response time monitor in the next month or so, but I'm gonna poke here if anyone has a had a good buy recently.
I use two different 27" 1080p IPS displays -- the ASUS VG27AH and the Dell S2740L. For me both work fine for gaming. I like the display quality of the Dell slightly better (e.g. the Dell has a more uniform brightness) but the Dell has a super reflective surface cause it's so glossy and has no AG coating. Both are also 6-bit panels.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_s2740l.htm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 31, 2014, 11:56:49 PM
Are you folks with powerline all using the NetGear stuff or a different brand? Been wanting to try this, hate running wire.

Mine are TP-Link because they were affordable. Have had no problems at all with them. I've got a friend who's got Netgear ones that he also says work great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on January 02, 2015, 09:57:17 AM
I use two different 27" 1080p IPS displays -- the ASUS VG27AH and the Dell S2740L. For me both work fine for gaming. I like the display quality of the Dell slightly better (e.g. the Dell has a more uniform brightness) but the Dell has a super reflective surface cause it's so glossy and has no AG coating. Both are also 6-bit panels.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_s2740l.htm


Thanks for the reply Trippy. Unfortunately, we like matt rather than gloss so that Dell, although it looks great in just about every regard, would get an immediate veto from the missus. That said, Dells are looking more and more like a good direction to go in. I know they don't have that gaming 'panache' that Asus does, but they do seem to pay attention to 'old fashioned' values such as color.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 02, 2015, 10:18:54 AM
Forgot to note that I am using ZyXEL powerline networking.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 02, 2015, 02:35:00 PM
I use two different 27" 1080p IPS displays -- the ASUS VG27AH and the Dell S2740L. For me both work fine for gaming. I like the display quality of the Dell slightly better (e.g. the Dell has a more uniform brightness) but the Dell has a super reflective surface cause it's so glossy and has no AG coating. Both are also 6-bit panels.

http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_s2740l.htm


Thanks for the reply Trippy. Unfortunately, we like matt rather than gloss so that Dell, although it looks great in just about every regard, would get an immediate veto from the missus. That said, Dells are looking more and more like a good direction to go in. I know they don't have that gaming 'panache' that Asus does, but they do seem to pay attention to 'old fashioned' values such as color.
I am not a big fan of 16:9 but they bought me two U2414H monitors at work and they are nice. They have no bezel except about 3/8" at the bottom so dual monitors is pretty seamless. Looks like they just released a 16:10 version, the U2415 which looks to be similar in terms of bezel size.

I know people who have the slightly older U2412H monitors and love them for just about everything, gaming included.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 04, 2015, 11:36:38 AM
Well, I haven't pulled the trigger yet, but I think I'm going to go with a 29" ultra-wide (same vertical measurement as a 22", but 1/3 wider, 2560x1080) and soundbar. In addition to the question of whether my 870m can push 6 megapixels, I'd be trying to integrate three different interfaces (with all the associated frame sync issues). Triple monitor is just too unwieldy an assembly to try and match with a laptop, and a "display" six times as wide as it is tall is probably just a little too much peripheral vision.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on January 09, 2015, 08:17:22 PM
Any recommendations on mouse and keyboard?  I have some Amazon credit and was hoping to upgrade my $11 keyboard and this shitty G400s I bought recently.  Torn between that and a new monitor after reading about folks getting some 27" ones above.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 10, 2015, 05:20:14 PM
Asked this in the build thread but probably should have gone here:

So it turns out my router is throttling my internet speed.  Any recommendations for a good wireless router?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 10, 2015, 06:04:28 PM
Asked this in the build thread but probably should have gone here:

So it turns out my router is throttling my internet speed.  Any recommendations for a good wireless router?


Apple Airport base stations are really nice. Never heard any complaints about them but they are more expensive than others.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 10, 2015, 06:06:04 PM
ASUS RT-AC68U.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 10, 2015, 09:27:25 PM
Well, I wound up going with a 29" AOC ultra wide screen (21:9 ratio, 2560x1080) and a Visio 29" soundbar. Umm, wow.

It's the same vertical screen height as a normal 22" 16:9, and can function as one (with black pillars).  I haven't had a chance to actually play a game with it yet, but I did fire up MWO and run around the testing grounds, it really does give you a wider FoV in that game (some others restrict your horizontal FoV to a fixed number of degrees and wider screens mean narrower verticals), which will come in handy.

For movies, it is just sweet. 21:9 works out to 2.35:1, which is very close to a true cinematic ratio, so movies that haven't been cut down to 16:9 for BluRay release fill the whole screen. The built in speakers aren't much (tinny and underpowered, as usual), but with the soundbar, it's great, better sound from that 2.0 soundbar than I would get from a cheap 5.1/7.1 system, without wires and little boxes all over the place.

I had considered a 34" LG (same resolution, there's also a 1440p version) but decided against it both because it was too big and heavy to mount on an articulated springloaded arm, and because there are lots of complaints of light bleed from inconsistent quality, and gamers said it suffered from ghosting. Glad I went a little smaller just because I can't imagine being comfortable sitting only a desk-width away from anything wider than the 29".

At $350, the AOC is a bit pricey (but no worse than the 27" ultra-HD's that are currently popular, never mind the 4k's) and I probably wouldn't have done it under normal circumstances (I had some leftover grant money I had to either spend or give back). It's both cheaper and reportedly better for gaming than the other 29" ultrawides, which run $410-440. It's quite a bit cheaper than the 34" models, which start at $600 and go up fast ($1300 for the curved LG 1440p 21:9).

I'll have to see how it does in my dorm room on an articulated arm (which hasn't arrived yet), but right now I'm ready to say to hell with the 200 PPI ultra-high definition models, ultrawide is the way to go big.

--Dave

Edit: The AOC also supports *all* of the video I/O formats (HDMI, DVI, VGA, and DisplayPort 1.2 both in and out). The only thing it doesn't have is optical audio, which is a big bucket of idgaf for me. All of the others are missing at least one of those (usually VGA), and most don't have DP daisy-chaining. It does just fine at outputting analog audio to my soundbar from a DP input. As a bonus the DP output is the only one coming directly from the NVidia chipset on my laptop, so I just shaved at least one frame worth of display lag.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 10, 2015, 10:08:28 PM
ASUS RT-AC68U.


Any benefit to going up to the P model of that for the faster processor? Its 20 bucks more.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 11, 2015, 12:41:34 AM
Probably not.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 17, 2015, 07:54:16 AM
Is there some error log other than Event Viewer in Win7?  I thought I had fixed my wife's computer when I replaced the optical drive, but it is again crashing and the only notable thing I see in Event Viewer is a kernel power.  I am once again thinking it might be the C: drive, the hangup there is that the ISO I tried to use to boot it to update the C: ... won't boot.  I do not have any idea where to look to determine root cause on these machines.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on January 20, 2015, 07:36:06 PM
I've had a couple BSODs over the last few months, with the error code "IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL"; Google suggests its a memory issue involving a new hardware/driver install, or an OS upgrade but I haven't done any of those. Any ideas what random part might be dying?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on January 20, 2015, 07:46:36 PM
I get that a lot when my video card is about to say goodbye.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on January 21, 2015, 09:37:38 AM
I had it with a flaky memory stick last year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 23, 2015, 12:31:57 PM
Best gaming laptop under $1400?

Does this exist?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 23, 2015, 12:47:28 PM
Not at $1400, unless there's a sale/rebate. At $1500 you can get a 970M.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 24, 2015, 12:16:14 AM
Best gaming laptop under $1400?

Does this exist?
You can get the low end of the MSI Dominator line for $1200 (870M, 8gb, i7 4800MQ). Mine is the Dominator Dragon (same but i7 4810MQ and a shiny red case for $50 more, no longer available). $1500 gets you the same basic model but with a 128gb SSd and the 970M (but downgrades the screen to 15.6").

If I were buying today rather than 6 months ago, I'd bite the bullet for the 970M, but it wasn't available under the $2000 point at the time. The smaller integrated screen isn't that big a deal, as you'll generally be using an external monitor for gaming.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 25, 2015, 09:26:04 AM
Good info.  Another $100 won't be hard to push her into.

Follow up: could the 970M handle The Sims 3 with ALL OF THE ADDONS?  Plus <INSERT EXPONENT HERE> community content?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 25, 2015, 11:50:37 AM
A 970m is like a slightly slower GTX 760. A GTX 260 can pretty much max out The Sims 3 (http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/the_sims_3__high_end_vga_performance,4.html) (min FPS 71) so the 970m is way overkill if that's what this laptop is going to be used for.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 25, 2015, 01:58:47 PM
Yeah, the 970M is a beast of a card, comparing favorably with $300 desktop cards and is currently the best non-SLI option for laptops (given the recent price drop, that is probably about to change).  It will not only run Sims 3 with all of the options, it will probably be future-proofed against the next generation of the Sims franchise.  The 870M is about 60% of the 970M, and nearly as much overkill for Sims 3.

You're really looking at the question of how long this is going to be her primary computer, and what will she be running towards the end of that life cycle.  If she's going to be using it for 4-5 years, get the 970M.  If she'll probably be replacing it in 2-3 when the original battery degrades it to tethered mode, get the 870M and put the difference into SSD, RAM, or a new external monitor.  Another reason to overkill on GPU is that we're about to shift to ultra-high resolution, 1440p, 2K, and 'Ultra Wide".  What is overkill at 1920x1080 may not be at 3840x2160 or 3440x1440.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 28, 2015, 08:24:12 AM
Dave, you're absolutely on the right track.  I'm going to try one last time to fix her tower computer (reseat RAM, potentially buy replacement sticks) and if I can't, then it's going to be the one she uses for Sims 4 (which will eventually have as much content as Sims 3) and remote-desktop into work.

Found this:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=9514707&CatId=3998
Seems legit.  I assume it has WiFi because laptop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 28, 2015, 12:26:27 PM
That's an exceptionally good deal on that Asus, I'd jump on it quickly if you can convince her to pay the extra $200.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 30, 2015, 11:04:40 AM
Since she's the only one of us that is employed, I don't have a lot of pull at the moment. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 03, 2015, 12:17:13 AM
ASUS RT-AC68U.


Thanks for recommending this. I've been up on it for about 2 weeks and it is working great. Kicked up my speeds (both wired and wi-fi) by a factor of 4.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 03, 2015, 08:41:50 AM
:thumbs_up:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 09, 2015, 09:33:20 AM
So I have a Gforce 550 low end card for work. I have a motherboard with built in intel graphics. The video card doesn't seem to handle both DVI and VGA to two monitors without sending a weak signal to the VGA connected one, causing odd pixel 'shaking' for lack of a better word. I have therefore connected the VGA to the onboard video and left the DVI on the video card. This works fine in Windows, but I'm not getting automatic detection in Linux Mint (Cinnamon). Does anyone know the best way in Linux Mint Cinnamon to get the desktop environment to 'find' the new onboard connection?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 09, 2015, 09:54:16 AM
Did you install the Intel graphics driver?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on February 09, 2015, 10:40:06 AM
I ran the Intel installer and I -think- it has the drivers:

$ lspci | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF116 [GeForce GTX 550 Ti] (rev a1)


$ sudo inxi -Gxz
Graphics:  Card-1: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller bus-ID: 00:02.0
           Card-2: NVIDIA GF116 [GeForce GTX 550 Ti] bus-ID: 01:00.0
           X.org: 1.15.1 drivers: nvidia,intel (unloaded: fbdev,vesa,nouveau) tty size: 80x24 Advanced Data: N/A for root

The issue seems more that Cinnamon doesn't want to see the second monitor un the System Settings > Display applet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on March 24, 2015, 11:47:50 PM
Should I install my games on my SSD or SATA drive?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 25, 2015, 01:51:18 AM
As many on the SSD as will fit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 25, 2015, 04:30:20 AM
Yeah, presumably anything where you might want some improved performance or general startup/load times.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 30, 2015, 06:19:12 PM
ASUS RT-AC68U.


Thanks for recommending this. I've been up on it for about 2 weeks and it is working great. Kicked up my speeds (both wired and wi-fi) by a factor of 4.
Fuck, is that thing THAT good?

Sheit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 02, 2015, 10:21:47 PM
Anyone know anything about making PDFs? I've got a lot of homebrew D&D content in text form (Open Office .odt) that I'd like to put into one file with bookmarks and shit. I'd also maybe like to add some pictures and/or change the background from plain white, but those are less important. This isn't serious enough that I want to spend money on a program, just something to put all of my content in one place for my players instead of having to send out 20+ documents.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 03, 2015, 05:27:14 AM
Do the formatting in your word processor, then either save as PDF (if it is an option) or get pdfcreator off the web and "print to" that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 03, 2015, 07:51:34 AM
I'll second PDF Creator.  There are others out there if that gives you trouble.  (Cute PDF is one we use as an alternate.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 04, 2015, 07:39:23 AM
Quick browser question: Is it still Chrome > Firefox > IE/Spartan/whatever for speed and compatibility? Or has that changed recently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on April 04, 2015, 08:25:07 AM
Quick browser question: Is it still Chrome > Firefox > IE/Spartan/whatever for speed and compatibility? Or has that changed recently.

That's a really great question. I find I'm currently using 35% Firefox, 65% Chrome now, where I used Chrome exclusively over the past ~5 years. Chrome is a damn memory hog. You'll likely get different responses here.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 04, 2015, 02:53:29 PM
I'm a Firefox fanboi; Chrome is an awful memory hog.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on April 04, 2015, 08:50:06 PM
Thanks. Yea, I've been having some Chrome issues on a couple of my machines and it seems memory related. Or at least process related (there's always 5 processes minimum).

Separate question now:

I have a Netgear Nighthawk R7000 router. All of a sudden it seems the 2.4ghz portion shit the bed. I can't get any devices to connect to it no matter what I set, and some of these devices don't like the 5G option (two old Kindles). Google's been no help to me. Everyone wants to talk about DD-WRT or some other model.

I could accept burning out a channel maybe. Bought this thing only a year ago. We only have like 16 devices, but only six are used at any given time. I've never heard of a channel burning out before. But I've never had one that could do 2.4ghz and 5ghz either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 07, 2015, 09:25:33 PM
Does anyone know the best way in Linux Mint Cinnamon to get the desktop environment to 'find' the new onboard connection?

It has been 3 years since I looked into it but last I checked it was some extremely difficult shit (i would say unpossible but there are a handful of crazies in the world that slogged through it) to get any flavor of Linux to run multiple monitors across different brands of GPUs.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 11, 2015, 07:33:26 PM
Got the new PC together (no POST errors, woo!) but my browser is doing something weird: whenever I visit certain pages (the f13 advanced search page in particular) the monitor dims. I've disabled Adaptive Brightness on startup according to a Google, but their other suggestion is to disable monitor dimming under Display in Advanced Power Settings and that option isn't there for me.

Edit: Fixed it by switching my HDTV to Game mode, which also got rid of the input lag I was about to whine about.

Edit 2: Now I'm noticing that images are like...grainy. Google seems to indicate that this is a problem when using an HDMI cable to hook up an HDTV as a monitor; I was using a VGA cable before with a VGA-DVI adapter and I assumed that the HDMI would be an upgrade. Is there a fix? I know we have a lot of people using TVs as monitors (hai2uSky) so hopefully someone knows what's up.

Edit 3: Switching from 1080p down to 1680x1050 fixed it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on April 11, 2015, 09:14:09 PM
Got the new PC together (no POST errors, woo!) but my browser is doing something weird: whenever I visit certain pages (the f13 advanced search page in particular) the monitor dims. I've disabled Adaptive Brightness on startup according to a Google, but their other suggestion is to disable monitor dimming under Display in Advanced Power Settings and that option isn't there for me.

Edit: Fixed it by switching my HDTV to Game mode, which also got rid of the input lag I was about to whine about.

Edit 2: Now I'm noticing that images are like...grainy. Google seems to indicate that this is a problem when using an HDMI cable to hook up an HDTV as a monitor; I was using a VGA cable before with a VGA-DVI adapter and I assumed that the HDMI would be an upgrade. Is there a fix? I know we have a lot of people using TVs as monitors (hai2uSky) so hopefully someone knows what's up.

Edit 3: Switching from 1080p down to 1680x1050 fixed it.

Could be a few things. Does the tv have a PC input mode? Check to see if it does, maybe where you set it to game mode. Or somewhere else, it would depend on the model. And make sure your HDTV is actually 1080p and not 1080i.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 11, 2015, 10:01:24 PM
There's no PC setting in where I found Game mode; there is a PC option in another menu but it's greyed out. Someone suggested I rename the HDMI input to PC HDMI to trick the monitor into thinking it's a PC and unlock said option, but no dice. The TV is in fact 1080p, plays 1080p fine on my PS4.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on April 11, 2015, 10:44:31 PM
If that option was just 'PC', then try using the name PC or maybe PC DVI instead of PC HDMI.

The grayed out PC option is probably your best bet. Try and figure out why it's grayed out. Try plugging your hdmi cable into every hdmi plug on the tv. Sometimes they have more than one input, and certain settings are available on only one of them. For reasons. It may also only be available through a dvi input, if your tv happens to have one. If it does try just using a dvi-d cable and run the audio separately. At 1080p 60hz, the image quality will be equivalent.

edit: Oh, and was the PC option grayed out while you were running the vga/dvi adapter? Because dvi-i cables carry both digital and analog signals. The adapter won't actually convert a vga signal into digital. It just passes the analog through the dvi-i. If you were doing that while checking the pc option, then that might be why it was grayed out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 11, 2015, 11:09:29 PM
Renaming it to "PC" didn't work either, nor did the other HDMI ports. It doesn't have a DVI input (although it was advertised with one, it has an HDMI port that's labeled DVI :uhrr:). I will try using the VGA cable and the adapter again tomorrow, or maybe direct VGA; I'm getting screen tearing too that wasn't there on the old system and VSync isn't fixing it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 12, 2015, 07:19:57 AM
If there is something labeled "PC" on the TV menu it is probably the D-sub connector on the back (VGA).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 12, 2015, 12:06:43 PM
You may need to fiddle with stuff on the PC end. E.g. if you are plugged in through the motherboard HDMI output you are going through the Intel integrated GPU and there's a separate Intel control panel you have fiddle with to make sure the port is outputting 1080p.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 12, 2015, 01:01:29 PM
I'm plugged in through my GFX card, which is a GeForce 960. I've messed around in there a bit but nothing I changed seemed helpful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 12, 2015, 01:25:21 PM
What's your TV?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on April 13, 2015, 03:49:25 PM
Let's assume everything below is totally legal.

Say I downloaded a movie off a newsgroup and it's not playing and it came with an EXE for a codec that I'm certainly not fucking installing. Does anyone know what codec these files are ACTUALLY using?


Decided to google it. Obnoxious.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2015, 03:52:19 PM
ffprobe which is part of ffmpeg will work. There are other tools as well with GUIs that will let you inspect media containers to see the codecs used inside.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 13, 2015, 04:41:58 PM
This is my TV here: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/sharp-42-class-42-diag--led-1080p-hdtv-black/5420123.p?id=1219128175218

Schild, you downloaded a video that came with an .EXE and you're surprised that it's not working? :awesome_for_real: The CCCP handles almost all video/audio codecs these days anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2015, 04:49:37 PM
Go to Menu -> Picture -> Advanced settings and make sure you have these settings:

View Mode: Normal
Overscan: Off
Active Backlight: Off
Motion Enhancement: Off
Color Temperature: Normal or Warm
Noise Reduction: Off
Active Contrast: Off


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on April 13, 2015, 05:03:35 PM
nzbgeek has lifetime membership for $30.

It has, as of today, already been worth every penny.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 13, 2015, 05:16:36 PM
Go to Menu -> Picture -> Advanced settings and make sure you have these settings:

View Mode: Normal
Overscan: Off
Active Backlight: Off
Motion Enhancement: Off
Color Temperature: Normal or Warm
Noise Reduction: Off
Active Contrast: Off

My View Mode is set to Wide because normal squishes everything and puts big black bars on either side of my screen. Other settings have been set that way the whole time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2015, 05:20:22 PM
If you see black bars with PC input via HDMI on the Normal setting your PC is not outputting 16:9 video.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 13, 2015, 09:18:55 PM
Hmm, I guess the black bars thing was happening at 1680x1050 in Normal but it doesn't happen at 1080p. Pictures still look strange and grainy in 1080p though, even with it set to Normal.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2015, 09:24:42 PM
Post a picture.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 13, 2015, 09:44:54 PM
Post a picture.

Had to take them with my phone.
1080p:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kq21f4atfwmzpf5/2015-04-13%2023.42.56.jpg?dl=0
1680x1050:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fekrgobfcr4mqm4/2015-04-13%2023.43.31.jpg?dl=0


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on April 13, 2015, 10:47:16 PM
How do I extract a series of files ending in .x01 - .xwhatever.

Weird ass Not Rars all up in my grill.


7Zip will chew through anything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 14, 2015, 01:31:12 AM
View something with more text on PC and compare with same page on PS4 in its browser. At this point though I would say your TV just isn't very good.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on April 14, 2015, 04:38:39 AM
I checked the manual for your tv model. Chimpy was right, the PC option is referring to a vga input on the back of the tv.

Hmm, I guess the black bars thing was happening at 1680x1050 in Normal but it doesn't happen at 1080p. Pictures still look strange and grainy in 1080p though, even with it set to Normal.

Yeah, 1680x1050 is 1.6, you'll get bars on a 1.78 ratio display. That's unrelated. Lets try a few more things. The reviews look good, and mention the picture being sharp, so I doubt it's just the tv being crap. Turn CeC off. Set the view mode to normal. And check the borders of the tv display to make sure there isn't still some kind of overscan going on. If the edges of the screen are getting chopped off, or you have extra border around the edges, then you still have some kind of overscan going on.

Before you do anything else, be sure to upgrade your gpu drivers to whatever is current.

Run an hdmi cable from the gpu to an hdmi port on the tv. If you have a dvi/hdmi converter, connect your gpu on a dvi port and your tv on the hdmi port labelled dvi. This may be necessary later, if these changes don't work.

Right click and go to the nvidia control panel.

First off, go to 'view HDCP status' and make sure that's not broken. It'd a content protection thing, and if something isn't getting recognised correctly, it might be doing something stupid.

Go to 'set up digital audio' and disable everything. Apparently sometimes audio over hdmi can futz with the chroma subsampling to reduce bandwidth and your tv might not like that.

Then go to 'change resolution'. Be sure the gpu is actually set to 1920x1080. Supposedly your tv can handle 120hz. Go ahead and try 120 if it isn't already set there, but just set the gpu to 60hz for now.

Next, go to 'adjust desktop size and position'. Under the 'size' tab, disable desktop resizing. Go to the 'scaling' tab and set perform scaling on GPU and check override.

If none of this did anything, then my best guess is it's an edid problem. Go to 'Adjust desktop color settings'. Do you have an option to change the color format and/or chroma subsampling? Try all possible combinations of 4:4:4 4:2:2 and 4:2:0 chroma and RGB/YCrCb. If this doesn't work, or you can't adjust the color settings manually, then the only other thing I can think of would be to manually edit a custom GPU output profile.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 14, 2015, 07:51:37 PM
I've tried most of your suggestions with no luck. However, the color format refuses to change. I have RGB and YCbCr444 as options, but trying to switch from RGB to YCbCr doesn't work. I change the selection in the dropdown menu, the screen goes black for a second then comes back looking identical with RGB still selected. I don't have a separate section for chroma.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on April 17, 2015, 09:32:37 PM
I've tried most of your suggestions with no luck. However, the color format refuses to change. I have RGB and YCbCr444 as options, but trying to switch from RGB to YCbCr doesn't work. I change the selection in the dropdown menu, the screen goes black for a second then comes back looking identical with RGB still selected. I don't have a separate section for chroma.


*shrug* Checked a thread that said your model tv should support 4:4:4, so subsampling shouldn't be the cause of the image problems. You might try going into the tv's settings and turning sharpness all the way down. Sometimes tv's use a sharp filter that can look really bad on high frequency data like text. Probably not the solution, but it's worth trying.

It might be a problem with EDID. That's supposed to let these things talk to each other and tell them what their specifications are so they can send the right stuff. But hd standards are a huge clusterfuck and they just don't work sometimes. Like your gpu will see a tv, and it'll do processing to talk to a tv, and your tv will see a pc, and do processing to talk to a pc at the same time. Or neither will. If you haven't already, I'd try pluggin a dvi to hdmi adapter into your gpu. Sometimes dvi is just better behaved. But if that doesn't work, then short of ugly stuff like manually editing custom configurations you'll probably just be out of luck. Sorry.

If that's the case, you'll probably get the best quality from using a dvi to vga adapter on the gpu, and running a good vga cable to the pc in port on the back of the tv. Then select the PC option on the tv, which should no longer be grayed out. You may have to fiddle with some timing settings on the tv and/or nvidia control panel, but it's just analog so it should work once everything is set up right.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 20, 2015, 11:38:10 PM
Got an odd problem that's stumping me.

I have a small server here that I run headless, using Remote Desktop to connect to it. It's running the Windows 10 technical preview (which I'm really liking, as an aside). On Saturday our router died so I switched to an old one that I had lying around while waiting for a replacement. Now all of a sudden Remote Desktop won't work, just won't connect, as if the server isn't there. I can access it's shared files & folders over the network fine and plugging a monitor & mouse into it all looks OK. No permissions or settings have changed at all, just the router. I can still do Remote Desktop connection to the other PCs in the house just fine.

I've ordered a cheap DVI monitor switch as a stop-gap solution but I'd much rather have RDP working again. Anyone got any ideas what might have gone wrong?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 21, 2015, 01:10:14 AM
Does RDC see the computer but it doesn't accept the credentials?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 01:55:27 AM
Nope, doesn't see it at all. I can see the PC in Explorer though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 21, 2015, 01:59:41 AM
Make sure the "allow remote connections" setting (wherever it is in Windows 10) is still enabled.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 03:04:12 AM
Yep, checked that. Also checked the user permissions are set right, tried deleting the connection entry on the PC that's trying to connect and recreated it. Checked the IP address hasn't changed. Tried using the IP directly instead of the server name.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 21, 2015, 06:05:48 AM
Go into the windows firewall settings. In properties, turn on logging of dropped packets. Then try to connect to it and see if traffic to port 3389 shows up.

That'll tell you if the traffic is getting through to the machine but getting dropped.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 07:04:45 AM
OK, took me some time to work out how to turn the packet logging on :-)

Nothing showing in the log file when I try to connect, so it looks like it's not reaching the server at all.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 21, 2015, 08:14:00 AM
Windows 7 and above has two security levels of RDP, one that only works with Windows 7 and above, which is the one on by default. Check to see if the 'less secure' option is selected or if you are using the Win7+ one. Try the less secure one; I don't know if the 'new' RDP protocol uses a new port or what's up with that, but it may be blocked by your older router.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 21, 2015, 09:12:18 AM
If he is connecting via Ethernet inside his house, the router should not be doing anything to the traffic. At least I have never heard of a consumer grade device that does layer3 filtering on the internal switch. And I would expect 137/445 to be blocked before 3389 since those are more vulnerable.

But stranger things have happened.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 09:19:36 AM
Hmm, can't find that option Engels.

A minor fly in the ointment is that I can't remember the old router admin password so I can't dick about with it checking ports etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 21, 2015, 10:28:01 AM
This spot here:

(http://i.imgur.com/PnZD4t2.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 10:54:50 AM
Aha! That wasn't actually it, but in poking around in settings on the server I discovered that windows 10 had decided it was on a public network when the router changed and therefore the firewall was blocking RDP.

Sorted. Thanks for the help everyone :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 21, 2015, 12:09:23 PM
Hmm, that's odd. Public network doesn't block RDP by default on Windows 7 or 8. I hope it doesn't do so in 10 or I'm gonna have to mess with extra stuff at work when that comes out. Mutter...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 21, 2015, 12:49:22 PM
Not outgoing connections, but incoming ones.  It gives me all kinds of headaches.

"Goddammit you stupid machine, it's the same network it was yesterday and the week before that, and the month before both of them.  It's a server!  I am not plugging it in at my local Starbucks.  Why the hell do you think this is a public network!?!"


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 01:06:14 PM
Not outgoing connections, but incoming ones.  It gives me all kinds of headaches.

"Goddammit you stupid machine, it's the same network it was yesterday and the week before that, and the month before both of them.  It's a server!  I am not plugging it in at my local Starbucks.  Why the hell do you think this is a public network!?!"

This exactly. I have no idea why swapping routers made it decide it was a public network but it's very annoying. Still, at least I'm wise to it's tricksy ways now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 21, 2015, 01:11:03 PM
I always set my rules for all network types on Windows servers. Sure, I would love to lock it down to domain only for almost everything but you never know when the network detection is going to throw you for a loop and change. I have edge firewalls for the bulk of stuff, and my servers don't live on subnets I don't control.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on April 21, 2015, 02:18:18 PM
Not outgoing connections, but incoming ones. 

Wait, on a Windows 10 desktop, one cannot remote desktop -into- the desktop on a Public network setting by default? Because that a change from Windows 7. We haven't used Win 8 except on a few tablets here and there, so I can't comment on that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on April 21, 2015, 04:06:20 PM
I haven't touched 10 yet so I cannot say, but I would not be surprised if it denies it by default.  (I mean, really, it's a smart thing to do.  Just annoying if it decides your home network is public when it's not.

Hopefully I work up the nerve to tell work to stuff it before 10 comes out so I don't have to worry about it.  Just want to get this renewal cert under my belt...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 21, 2015, 11:22:15 PM
Wait, on a Windows 10 desktop, one cannot remote desktop -into- the desktop on a Public network setting by default?

That seems to be the case at the moment, yes.

I've submitted feedback about it, no idea if there's the slightest chance in Basingstoke that it will have any effect.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 25, 2015, 08:46:49 AM
So I unplugged my computer today, opened up the case, vaccumed up some dust (on the floor of the case), packed it back up.

And now it won't turn on. No power of any kind, no lights, no sound heat or movement.

I've tried to check everything I could think/search. It won't turn on with only the MB connected. The PSU to wall cable still works and the wall socket still has power (both confirmed with monitor). I've checked the PSU to mb connections several times. I've taken out the CMOS battery for 15 min and retried. I'm using the mb power buttons and not the case ones.

I don't have a means to check the PSU unit itself at the moment but I'm wondering if I'm correct in my assumption that either the PSU or mb must have gone? The computer is less than six months old.

The only other thing that may be relevant is that when I opened the case I noticed that the CPU fan was loose and the connection between it and the processor had been lost. Messing up the thermal compount a little.

I'm assuming this was the case prior to me opening the case, when the computer was working fine, as I didn't touch it.

I have not had any issues of any sort with the comp before this.

Any ideas on what might be the problem and what I could check?

Have I somehow stuffed the PSU/mb or processor?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on April 25, 2015, 11:45:53 AM
Maybe fried something with the static from the vacuum cleaner?  There is a good reason we use canned air to blow shit all over the place as opposed to vacuuming the insides of computers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 25, 2015, 12:47:46 PM
Did you somehow short the motherboard to the case? I would take the motherboard out of the case and try to power it on that way.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 25, 2015, 05:49:40 PM
I'm not sure what you mean Trippy, just take the MB out and try to power it on with the PSU? How would that differ from doing it in the case?

Also if no action there any way to see if it is psu or mb issue?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on April 25, 2015, 05:57:24 PM
If the computer was working fine before you took it apart, then the cpu fan being loose wouldn't be the problem. It's not like it'll start overheating the minute you turn the computer on.

You can do a ghetto psu test by pluggin a fan or something into the unit and shorting power on to ground using a paperclip or something. Leave everything else unplugged, and don't leave the thing running like this, but just turning it on for a second or two to see if the fan spins up is fine. It doesn't tell you if the psu is fully functional, but if the fan spins up correctly it probably is.

http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-power-up-an-ATX-Power-Supply-without-a-PC/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVt3nYv4zlU

And yeah, take the mb out of the case, just to make sure there isn't a screw or something wedged in there and shorting something out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 25, 2015, 06:24:22 PM
Cheers for the tips, PSU runs the fan when shorted, mb does nothing at all when just it is plugged in to the PSU.

Pretty conclusive that I've fried the mb then, right? I guess I could have fried more part too tho? Or would it be less likely to bugger the HDS, ram and GPU? Would suck if I somehow stuffed the whole computer.

Edit: looks like this might be a common issue with my mb. Asroxk extreme gameing z97. There's a a reddit post with the exact issue.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on April 25, 2015, 06:29:38 PM
Make sure your RAM is still well seated too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 25, 2015, 06:58:57 PM
Confirmed I have the exact same issue from the reddit thread.http://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/2jrt1b/psarequest_possible_reoccurring_problem_with_the/

Hopefully this means I didn't damage anything else, at least.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 27, 2015, 02:55:20 AM
Possibly stupid question: should I remove and apply some new thermal compound when putting the cpu and fan in to the new MB? I assume yeah...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 27, 2015, 04:48:39 AM
Possibly stupid question: should I remove and apply some new thermal compound when putting the cpu and fan in to the new MB? I assume yeah...

If it is damaged, definitely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 27, 2015, 05:00:11 AM
Possibly stupid question: should I remove and apply some new thermal compound when putting the cpu and fan in to the new MB? I assume yeah...

If it is damaged, definitely.


Fo sho.  I had a similar problem in one of the boys' PCs six months ago where I noticed that the fans were working too hard and the CPU temp was borderline extreme (and causing slowdowns).  The connection between the CPU and fan was going to poop.  I repasted it, and it instantly dropped 30 freaking degrees.  Celsius, that is.  Never before have I seen so clearly demonstrated just how important that stupid paste really is.

Also, surely you can RMA that mb?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 27, 2015, 02:20:38 PM
Yeah working through that now. Impatient to be without a computer for however long this is going to take though.

3-5 weeks.

What's the point of a warranty that only replaces parts that takes that long. Let me take a replacement up front at least so I can actually use my PC for the next month!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 29, 2015, 12:48:53 PM
Making progress on my file repo project using AWS.  Finally figured out what I was doing wrong with S3 access via boto, so now I can get_all_buckets() and everything.

The question concerns whether to write my own file put-get program in python, or is there a canned tool which either:
1. Creates something like a nfs mount which I can use as a location for vsftp files.
2. Some other tool that works with vsftp somehow.
3. Something other than vsftp for uploads?

Since I'm supposed to be learning python, I'm inclined to write my own thing but I am curious about how this might be best done.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 29, 2015, 12:59:23 PM
You can use S3FS if you want to use FUSE.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 29, 2015, 01:00:31 PM
Saw that in a google search, but the enrgish was bad.  I'll give it a try.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 01, 2015, 12:58:31 PM
I suddenly find myself in the position of having to set up DNS on our network. Kinda got hung out to dry by our system people, not too happy about the way they did it.

We're running an apache server for our media dispenser and it works great outside our network. However, inside our network it won't accept the connection to the URL that points to the external IP (there is a working internal IP, the apache server is in a DMZ and we have multiple vlans staff/public/etc on some cisco doohickey the system people have locked me out of). Our system folks said we need to set up our own DNS and good luck byekthx. We'd like to get the service up and running ASAP, since it's working except this one issue.

Never having looked at linux but having many years experience using the command line supporting our OSX file server, should I bother trying to tech myself enough linux and bind to get it running?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 01, 2015, 01:04:05 PM
What are your workstations using for their DNS server?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 01, 2015, 01:07:47 PM
Is there a reason why you can't just use a URL that has the internal IP address instead of the hostname? You can setup your own DNS server but then you have to tell all the clients that need to access that media server to use that DNS server. Do you control the DHCP server?

I haven't tried this guide I found myself but it should give you an idea what would involved in setting up your own DNS server:

https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-bind-as-a-private-network-dns-server-on-ubuntu-14-04

Edit: Also if there are only a handful of devices that need to access this media server and they all have proper /etc/hosts (or equivalent) files it's probably a lot easier to just customize those files.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 01, 2015, 02:58:18 PM
Chimpy: google dns, mostly

Trippy, it's a subdomain that is accessed primarily via the web, using the external IP that forwards to the webserver in the dmz. I don't control the DHCP but they said they would point it as needed after I go ahead and learn linux and set up dns by myself.

For our computers in the library, I could edit /etc/hosts, that's how I'm running it for my work computer for now. Changing the 75 or so machines wouldn't be ideal, but it's doable.

Problem is wireless and mobile patrons inside the library. Currently they're SOL and we strive to provide our services on anything that walks through the door. (And technically mobile patrons could just turn off wifi to connect externally via cell but blah).

Times like this is when I get resentful of not being allowed to do the lower level network stuff, I hate being at the mercy of a not necessarily cooperative agency. They just decide they don't want to do it and throw some contractual language at me, when for the most part we cooperate way beyond what our contract stipulates because we try not to be douchebags in a cooperative nonprofit environment where their mission statement is to serve the member libraries. But I digress. (We're also the only library asking for anything more advanced than 'order and set up our computers for us, might magicians', so I guess we're uppity and whatnot)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on May 01, 2015, 03:22:57 PM
Setting up bind is trivial to do and the link that Trippy posted should be straight forward enough. Just make sure you spend a little time "hardening" the server. Since you are allowing any public user to connect to it you will get some people that will most likely have something malicious attack it. Preferably put the server behind a firewall and only allow the dns ports through the firewall to that ip space.

Also a word of warning, if you setup a domain that is valid and is using external dns servers make sure you replicate any and all records for it. So for example you have www.example.com, you also want to setup example.com and if the media server is something like media.example.com make sure you set that up as well. This is really important to make sure that it is as seamless as possible to the end users.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 01, 2015, 04:45:05 PM
DNS is pretty simple, though most of my experience is on the Windows side.  Other than the commands it's just a matter of getting it all straight.  If I understand it, your setup is something such as:

WAN IP:  7.7.7.7 (library.sky.net)
DMZ IP:  172.16.50.10
LAN IP:  192.168.1.25

So from outside someone can go to http://library.sky.net and get to the server.  Inside trying to go to that address times out, because the routers don't want to send a connection out then back in.  You can get there by using http://192.168.1.25, but you want patrons to use the name address?

What DNS servers do computers on the network currently use?  Is it all public stuff like Google or your Library's ISP?  Do you not have internal name addresses at all, only numerics?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 01, 2015, 05:12:21 PM
If it is accessible via the DMZ, then you should just have everything go to that IP (and unless there is some really pressing reason why you need to have an internal IP, get rid of the internal interface entirely.) Give that DMZ address a DNS host record that is advertised to the world and then have your internal staff go out through the "Cisco doohickey" to get to the pages just like anyone else.

Provided your internal staff who need to connect to this resource are able to get out to the web, that is going to be a hell of a lot easier to set up and manage than running your own internal DNS server. It also keeps that box from becoming an easy gateway into your trusted network if it is compromised.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2015, 09:23:47 AM
If it is accessible via the DMZ, then you should just have everything go to that IP (and unless there is some really pressing reason why you need to have an internal IP, get rid of the internal interface entirely.) Give that DMZ address a DNS host record that is advertised to the world and then have your internal staff go out through the "Cisco doohickey" to get to the pages just like anyone else.

Provided your internal staff who need to connect to this resource are able to get out to the web, that is going to be a hell of a lot easier to set up and manage than running your own internal DNS server. It also keeps that box from becoming an easy gateway into your trusted network if it is compromised.
Want to come work for our library system? This is the kind of response I was hoping to get from them. They hired some Melvin and paid for his Cisco certs and I get 'good luck, buddy'. Guaranteed that kid is looking for jobs, he believes 'libraries are for old people' (since the system doesn't serve the public, they don't see our patronage).

Aaanyway.

Killing that internal interface sounds like one of those obvious things I should've thought of :) I only use it for smb to dick around with a couple files, which I could easily do over the web. Trying to think of any other use for it, and coming up empty. So I'd request he kills the internal interfaces and locks down whatever he's opened between the dmz and the internal network (which as I type it doesn't make any sense anyway!)

I'll request that change and see how it goes...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2015, 09:30:48 AM
Hmm, my VNC software is using the internal interface and won't use the external one (connection refused).

Is there some limitation on the router that won't let it connect to the external interface the connection is originating from?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hammond on May 04, 2015, 12:35:40 PM
Hmm, my VNC software is using the internal interface and won't use the external one (connection refused).

Is there some limitation on the router that won't let it connect to the external interface the connection is originating from?

Yes the problem you are running into is due to traffic coming from the same interface. And you really really should not be managing the server from the outside ip anyway. Judging from what you posted so far I think we do not have enough information about your setup. If you are running into this issue your public users will most likely run into the same.

Here is my guess on your setup.

1 internet connection which both your Guest users (patrons) and the Library (you) share. They are split up to a guest network and the library network separated on different Vlans (think separate networks). The Server is in a DMZ(dmz is really in its own vlan) which really allows both the guest users and your users to access it. And allows external users to access it as well. This is a pretty standard setup for networks. To do what Chimpy suggests in this scenario you have to implement something called Hair-pinning.  https://nat0.net/cisco-asa-hairpinning/  . Not all network devices support that and it can create additional load for the network device let alone not many network guys really understand how that works... Which is probably why the network guys kicked it over to you. They really don't understand how to make it work.

I take it the Media server you are running is a linux box? if so just install bind have the network guy forward the DNS ports internally and call it good. Make sure he doesn't expose those ports to the internet and you should have no more issues than you already have. Just keep in mind if they setup that server to act as a DNS forwarder in the DHCP any and all users that get ips from that DHCP scope (which is hopefully just the guest network users) will then be using that server for dns resolution. Its probably the quickest solution although from a security standpoint it royally sucks.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on May 04, 2015, 01:58:08 PM
That's why I was asking about the setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on May 04, 2015, 08:18:54 PM
My kid has been trying to up her YouTube video quality. She really likes the Minecraft videos that people makes, and she's been making her own for almost a year.

So now she wants an editing program. Does anyone know of a decent, cheap video recorder and editor software? She would like to incorporate her webcam and mic, she's really trying to emulate the Stampy and IhasCupquake folks.

For better or worse...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 04, 2015, 08:40:58 PM
My kid has been trying to up her YouTube video quality. She really likes the Minecraft videos that people makes, and she's been making her own for almost a year.

So now she wants an editing program. Does anyone know of a decent, cheap video recorder and editor software? She would like to incorporate her webcam and mic, she's really trying to emulate the Stampy and IhasCupquake folks.

For better or worse...
The Webcam thing is likely done through something like OBS (https://obsproject.com/). If you wander over to twitch.tv (http://twitch.tv) you can see what people are doing with software like that. For basic video editing I usually use some version of the non-Pro Vegas (http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/vegassoftware).

Just a word of caution: I would be very careful letting her post videos of herself on YouTube. There are very bad people out there who may decide to harass and stalk her.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on May 04, 2015, 08:47:44 PM
OBS is good for streaming, but it's kind of shit at recording. I used FRAPS for recording for years, but it doesn't like my new PC so I switched to Dxtory (http://exkode.com/dxtory-features-en.html) on the recommendation of a friend. Both of those can give really high quality, but will eat up HD space (for example, I have a 2m30s 1080x30 video that's 9.9 gigs).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 04, 2015, 08:54:30 PM
DNS is pretty simple, though most of my experience is on the Windows side.  Other than the commands it's just a matter of getting it all straight.  If I understand it, your setup is something such as:

WAN IP:  7.7.7.7 (library.sky.net)
DMZ IP:  172.16.50.10
LAN IP:  192.168.1.25

So from outside someone can go to http://library.sky.net and get to the server.  Inside trying to go to that address times out, because the routers don't want to send a connection out then back in.  You can get there by using http://192.168.1.25, but you want patrons to use the name address?
That is pretty much teh IP setup.

Main problem as it stands is that we want patrons to connect to library.sky.net from our website, both inside the library and at home.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 04, 2015, 08:55:07 PM
OBS is good for streaming, but it's kind of shit at recording. I used FRAPS for recording for years, but it doesn't like my new PC so I switched to Dxtory (http://exkode.com/dxtory-features-en.html) on the recommendation of a friend. Both of those can give really high quality, but will eat up HD space (for example, I have a 2m30s 1080x30 video that's 9.9 gigs).
I would assume she already has something that's doing the game video capture since Hawkbit said she's already making Minecraft videos. So she needs something that can do the overlay and add an extra audio track both of which OBS can do if you are doing it while you play or you can do it afterwards in something like Vegas.

Edit: For game video capture I'm using Action! (https://mirillis.com/en/products/action.html) now. I tried to use Bandicam for a while but it seemed to be pretty unstable causing various games to crash while recording. I also tried NVIDIA's ShadowPlay but that has a horrible 4 GB file size limit in Windows 7 so I quickly gave up on that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on May 04, 2015, 10:09:08 PM

The Webcam thing is likely done through something like OBS (https://obsproject.com/). If you wander over to twitch.tv (http://twitch.tv) you can see what people are doing with software like that. For basic video editing I usually use some version of the non-Pro Vegas (http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/vegassoftware).

Just a word of caution: I would be very careful letting her post videos of herself on YouTube. There are very bad people out there who may decide to harass and stalk her.


Thanks, Trippy and Rendakor. I've been part of her profile since the beginning, so if something bad happens I'm aware. Thanks for the reminder, though. Much appreciated for the tips.

EDIT: Our first attempt last year was with FRAPS, but it really didn't seem to hold up on the notebook she uses. She's using Bandicam free now, which leaves a watermark and is 10 minutes max. It's fine, but she's really trying to take it to the next level.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 05, 2015, 05:55:17 PM
My son was using the Hauppauge HD PVR2, however I can't really comment on the relative quality since I don't watch those videos.  From my view telling him to close the laptop for dinner, it looks fine to me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on May 05, 2015, 11:16:48 PM
Have you tried XSplit?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on June 02, 2015, 05:20:59 PM
Anyone else having issues with a newer (GTX9xx) card and the most recent nVidia drivers?  After updating to anything after the GTA5 drivers (350.12), I got weird artifacting and lockups in all of my 3D applications until I reverted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 03, 2015, 12:09:36 PM
Deprived of Visio.  Google Draw suuuuuucks.  I need to make serious diagrams but I don't want to spend any amount of money beyond what I must.  What do you use?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 03, 2015, 12:30:20 PM
OmniGraffle? :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 03, 2015, 12:37:45 PM
Well, exchanging this Win7 machine for a Mac isn't completely out of the question.  Since I'm learning an entire enterprise architecture from the ground up, though, I'm not sure I can handle that conversion right now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 03, 2015, 12:42:17 PM
There's an iPad version too :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 03, 2015, 01:04:12 PM
Why don't I just draw on paper and take a picture?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 03, 2015, 01:08:30 PM
Sure, that'll work too!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 03, 2015, 01:37:40 PM
I used to use SmartDraw and liked it quite a bit more than Visio, but haven't done any flowcharting in a few years so I don't know what the latest versions are like. Dia Diagram is open source, and looks functional (if a bit short on aesthetic bells and whistles): http://dia-installer.de/ (http://dia-installer.de/)

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on June 03, 2015, 03:00:41 PM
Visio is awesome. I haven't found a replacement. SmartDraw is OK, but you might as well buy Visio.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 04, 2015, 04:15:54 AM
You can get Visio on Subscription through 365.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 04, 2015, 05:16:15 PM
Deprived of Visio.  Google Draw suuuuuucks.  I need to make serious diagrams but I don't want to spend any amount of money beyond what I must.  What do you use?

Depends on what kind of diagrams if it is for CASE type stuff then mockingbird and cacoo are both fairly decent, they are both on this list http://mashable.com/2010/07/15/wireframing-tools/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 06, 2015, 10:12:10 PM
I'll check out some of those.  Use will be your standard IT network diagramming, which mostly requires boxes, text, and lines that stay attached to their fucking vertices when I'm moving things around in order to make it less byzantine.  Remembering a font choice would be great also, Google.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 02:55:37 PM
Best Gigabit Switch, 8 port minimum. Wouldn't mind going bigger, can put modem and shit on top. Hit me with choices.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2015, 02:59:47 PM
http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-Unmanaged-Gigabit-GREENnet-TEG-S80g/dp/B001QUA6RA


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 03:44:05 PM
seriously? Trendnet? Never would've guessed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 08, 2015, 03:48:19 PM
They make the best consumer grade Ethernet switches at this point. The greens are really good and are usually cheaper than the competition.

Next best would probably be a netgear GS-108 (if they even make them anymore).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 03:51:56 PM
that is so strange to me


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 04:00:23 PM
So, this would be the best 16-port option? 8 port caps me out IMMEDIATELY:

http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-Unmanaged-Gigabit-GREENnet-TEG-S80g/dp/B001QUA6RA


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2015, 04:01:56 PM
Yup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 04:45:29 PM
I errrr, isn't this the newer model of the same thing? If so, gonna just order it when I get home from the store:

http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-Unmanaged-Gigabit-GREENnet-TEG-S82g/dp/B00C2H0YFU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1433807078&sr=8-1&keywords=TRENDnet+TEG-S82g


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2015, 05:03:36 PM
Do you mean this one?

http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-16-Port-Unmanaged-GREENnet-TEG-S16DG/dp/B0044GJ516

This one is for rack mounting:

http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-Unmanaged-GREENnet-Rack-Mount-TEG-S16G

You can get either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 07:33:35 PM
I linked the s82g, which would strike me as an update to the s80g but wtf do i know


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2015, 07:42:20 PM
I thought you wanted 16 ports now?

The specs seem to be the same between the 80g and 82g (and there's an 81g with the same specs too). The only thing I can see that's different is the design of the case. If you like the 82g go for it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2015, 07:44:03 PM
S82 ships faster lol


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ragnoros on June 12, 2015, 04:16:46 PM
How are PS4 loading times vs. PC these days? Thinking about picking up a PS4 as a stopgap until I can afford to upgrade my 7 year old PC for higher end games like Witcher 3, DA:I, Fallout 4, etc.

Comparing Witcher for example, a mid-high end PC and PS4 are fairly indistinguishable graphically, other than some foliage density and reported pop-in issues. I'm having a harder time finding info on load times. Anyone have info from friends or double dips?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 12, 2015, 04:43:05 PM
Since a mid to high end PC is going to be loading games from an SSD, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the PS4 will be molasses slow by comparison.

But compared to a 7 year old PC, it might feel like an upgrade.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 16, 2015, 10:35:05 AM
How are PS4 loading times vs. PC these days?

A $500 PC is a better investment than a $300-$400 PS4. Here:

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ryYLXL

Edit: I'm not saying buy that. I would never buy an AMD processor. Not since like 2001. But I'm just showing you how woeful this gen of consoles happens to be.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 16, 2015, 12:14:58 PM
I will say this: If you are gaming on PC, GET AN SSD. Break open the piggie-bank, sell a kidney, put off that video-card upgrade, if you are playing games on a PC and you do not have the games and OS loading from an SSD, you are doing it wrong. Even a 128gb model will make you a believer, and you can get those for $50.

Crucial MX100 250GB, $90. (http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-BX100-250GB-Internal-Solid/dp/B00RQA6TEI/) Same model I have in this rig, will max out SATA III for read speeds, 450MB/sec (a mere 200-250 MB/sec for writing). Tested reliability actually better than spinning platters.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: CaptainNapkin on June 17, 2015, 08:07:45 AM
A colleague is relocating from the US to Germany and looking to retain his US services of Netflix and HBO Go.

Will he need to go through a VPN service or something in order to get to these 2 services? If so, any recommendations? Also, if he uses Apple TV (to retain HBO Go), would a hardware VPN device work with one of these services?

This stuff if out of my wheelhouse but I recall some of you do things such as this, so any ideas are appreciated. Maybe VPN isn't answer? I have no idea.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 17, 2015, 09:21:20 AM
The short answer is yes, he would need some form of VPN.

I have never used a commercial VPN provider, so I don't know if they have support for tunnels set up through a hardware device.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 17, 2015, 03:23:18 PM
PC mag is useful!

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2403388,00.asp

I'm pretty sure all of those just use a software client (similar to FortiNET) and the hardware is all on their end.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 17, 2015, 08:48:42 PM
Anyone know about NAS servers as MySQL and PHP hosts? I am considering various NAS options, mostly at the low end of 'business grade' (price around $130-150). My best options appear to be either the "BUFFALO LinkStation Pro Duo" (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008DWAGPG/) (outdated model, but the newer versions appear to have had the MySQL and PHP support removed until you get above the $200 price point) or the TerraMaster F2-NAS2 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NXL662Y/), which is better hardware but from a foreign company with poor english support materials and less friendly firmware and interface.

Right now I am leaning towards the Buffalo, just because it would be easier to get it to do what I want (which includes being accessible from the internet as well as using as a torrent box when I am locked behind unfriendly firewalls). But I'm not sure even what other options might be available (I looked into Synology, but they appear to be completely out of my price range even in diskless form).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 17, 2015, 08:59:04 PM
Buffalo stuff in my experience is utter crap.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 17, 2015, 09:15:28 PM
More looking offered up the Synology DS214se (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FWURI8K/), which is the very bottom end of their offerings. It's rather anemic hardware compared to the other two, though. Or there's the QNAP TS-212P-US (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00G2HZNXO/), another Chinese line I know nothing about, I think.

Theoretically the WD My Cloud EX2 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00I2P53NY/) is in the same range, but I have not generally been impressed with WD products beyond their core HDD lines. It certainly has a nice set of management apps to go with it, though (I don't need them, but this is really for someone else and if it doesn't need me to babysit it...).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2015, 09:15:54 PM
I can recommend the Synology 215j if you want to spend the extra $50 though I haven't used MySQL or PHP on it.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2015, 09:17:08 PM
More looking offered up the Synology DS214se (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FWURI8K/), which is the very bottom end of their offerings. It's rather anemic hardware compared to the other two, though. Or there's the QNAP TS-212P-US (http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00G2HZNXO/), another Chinese line I know nothing about, I think.
QNAP is Taiwanese and they make good stuff. More expensive than Synology, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 17, 2015, 09:26:08 PM
QNAP is Taiwanese and they make good stuff. More expensive than Synology, though.

In a choice between the QNAP TS-231 ($190) and the Synology 215j ($200), which would you go for? Keep in mind, the primary function of this thing is supposed to be serving media on a home network, I'm trying to shoehorn some extra functions into it, but it needs to be able to do that job without a lot of care and feeding.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2015, 09:39:31 PM
I would go with the Synology personally but they are very similar. QNAP makes better stuff at the higher end but Synology is as good or better at the lower end and the 215j probably has the higher throughput compared to the TS-231.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 17, 2015, 10:03:35 PM
Will they both play nicely with WD Green 3TB's, or do I need to look at other drives? Part of why I was looking for diskless was that I already had those drives, which were in an old Dell box I was using for pretty much the same function (but it shit the bed if you were trying to stream two different movies at the same time).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2015, 10:09:24 PM
The 215j does list a WD 3 TB green drive (WD30EZRX) as compatible but the TS-231 does not.

https://www.qnap.com/i/en/product_x_grade/product_intro.php?g_cat=1&II=155
https://www.synology.com/en-global/compatibility?search_by=products&category=hdds&p=1&product_bays=2&product_name=DS215j&filter_size=3TB

I use WD Reds in my Synologies (I have an older 213j too).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 17, 2015, 10:29:02 PM
Yeah, it appears that the Synology have an automatic script to detect and turn off the aggressive "sleep" on greens (they park the heads after even a very short period without reads/writes), essentially they don't let the drive park unless the whole system is being turned off. There are hacks to do the same thing on virtually anything, but the Synology does it the "right way", with directions to the drive controllers rather than reading/writing every few seconds whether it needs it or not.

So, it looks like the 215J is the plan. The QNAP had some other features that were nice (three USB 3.0 ports instead of one 3.0 and one 2.0, two RJ45 gigabit ports rather than just one, an eSATA connector), but not having to drop yet another $240+ on drives right away outweighs expansion features I'd probably never use. 3TB of storage (6GB if I drop to RAID0) ought to be enough for any practical use I have, if I need to add another set of drives a single 3.0 port will get the job done, and connecting it to multiple wired networks is something I'd probably never actually do.

For a home media server it's already ridiculous overkill, and for a development sandbox MySQL/PHP server it should do fine.  Thanks, without you I probably would have wound up going with the Buffalo out of sheer name recognition.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 18, 2015, 02:20:00 AM
That would have been a mistake.  As Chimpy said, they're fucking awful.  Also, Netgear NAS devices are currently all bugged to hell and delete all your shit.  Be warned the rest of you.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on June 18, 2015, 05:40:18 AM
I would go QNAP as it is the only NAS I have heard good things about from people I know but I also wouldn't attempt to run a webserver and/or database on a NAS.  It isn't that hard or expensive to build a small form factor Linux server.  The buffalos we have at work are the slowest pieces of shit ever.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 18, 2015, 06:17:34 AM
Synology stuff works great and they are constantly updating their software.

Also, you could probably just use the free tier of AWS if all you want to do is have a sandbox for Php and MySQL.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 18, 2015, 08:29:22 AM
That would have been a mistake.  As Chimpy said, they're fucking awful.  Also, Netgear NAS devices are currently all bugged to hell and delete all your shit.  Be warned the rest of you.


Shit.. well glad I didn't power it up and do a firmware upgrade then. Thanks for the warning.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 19, 2015, 07:29:08 AM
You may remember my post from a while back saying  'Oh, I seem to have lost terabytes of data from my NAS, time for a support call' with the follow up post 'Support People are dicks'.

Basically, the Netgears are meant to be able to handle and size of iSCSI disks.  What they don't tell you is that the latest firmware is bugged and can't calculate the size correctly.  So they let it fill up beyond where it can go to and then crash.  And, at that point, you lose all your data.  Like, All of it.  Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect Anything.

We were using the NAS to store some Cloud Backup shit at the time, so it was something I was able to come back from, but only from the client point of view.  All the apps and data we'd been storing locally because 'hell, may as well put it there' was lost for Good.

I was not a happy Panda.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on June 19, 2015, 09:18:42 AM
Happy friday?  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 19, 2015, 04:06:07 PM
Oh, was this a professional-grade device then? Mine's a consumer grade I use at home. Only 1TB, mirrored on both disks.


Awkward Segue:

I've encountered a very weird problem at work and I hope some of you actual network types might have some idea of WTF could be the problem.  There's an entire floor of the office who is having 'weird' issues on the project/ storage volume. If one user deletes/ creates or moves files, they will disappear/ show up/ be navigable on their machine, but not on anyone else's for minutes at a time.

I encountered this firsthand for the first time yesterday. Woman created a folder, pushed all her render textures to it and called me to say they were there for my inspection. I couldn't see the folder or the files and a refresh of Explorer didn't show them either. I have 2 PCs so I checked on the 2nd and it was the same situation until the 2nd refresh, when they showed themselves. They then also appeared on the Laptop I was originally on. Time to appearance was about 2 1/2 mins.

Any idea what the fuck might do this? It's only this single floor that has this issue, and it happens if they're on a deadline and saving/ pushing files around frequently almost like clockwork. Considering there's only ~25 people on this floor and the floor with 50+ people on it with deadlines every day I'm fairly certain it's not a write-speed problem on the project volume.  Those 50+ people push more data onto storage in an afternoon than the  25 do on deadline day.

Thoughts? Hints? Laughter?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 19, 2015, 04:14:58 PM
Does this help?

http://serverfault.com/questions/482174/slow-shared-folder-refresh-on-windows-7


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 19, 2015, 06:34:24 PM
Possibly. I'll have to test on Monday, so thanks.  Seems odd it only affects folders made by this floor, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 03, 2015, 04:55:27 PM
Just as an update, finally got the Synology DS215j up and running the other day. It serves it's primary function well, although I'm having issues getting DLNA to work properly that may be on the other side, when I browse to files in folder view it works fine.

The apps for Android work well, haven't tried on iOS yet. There are some management functions that don't work well or at all from the apps, but I can run everything from a PC web browser like a somewhat slow and chunky X Windows session, so no worries. It is a bit slow with downloading torrents, but that may be more externally caused, at least I can initiate them from anywhere, then download from the NAS over HTTP.

It's been pretty painless to set up so far. Haven't delved into the web server functions yet, I assume they'll be a little harder.

--Dave

Edit: The iOS apps work pretty much identically to the Android apps, suspect they're HTML5. The DS Video is very cool, Synology DSM tracks down IMDB info from the filenames and puts the proper cover image on them, automagically (it sometimes gets them wrong, for example the Rio cover image is a picture of Katy Perry). I have it set to index just the "kid movies" sub folder, which lets me dump her stuff in there, she can use the DS Video app to access all of them, and she sees movie-poster cover images instead of text on folders full of confusing file labels.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on July 05, 2015, 01:19:41 PM
Just as an update, finally got the Synology DS215j up and running the other day. It serves it's primary function well, although I'm having issues getting DLNA to work properly that may be on the other side, when I browse to files in folder view it works fine.

The apps for Android work well, haven't tried on iOS yet. There are some management functions that don't work well or at all from the apps, but I can run everything from a PC web browser like a somewhat slow and chunky X Windows session, so no worries. It is a bit slow with downloading torrents, but that may be more externally caused, at least I can initiate them from anywhere, then download from the NAS over HTTP.

It's been pretty painless to set up so far. Haven't delved into the web server functions yet, I assume they'll be a little harder.

--Dave

Edit: The iOS apps work pretty much identically to the Android apps, suspect they're HTML5. The DS Video is very cool, Synology DSM tracks down IMDB info from the filenames and puts the proper cover image on them, automagically (it sometimes gets them wrong, for example the Rio cover image is a picture of Katy Perry). I have it set to index just the "kid movies" sub folder, which lets me dump her stuff in there, she can use the DS Video app to access all of them, and she sees movie-poster cover images instead of text on folders full of confusing file labels.



Suddenly I am no longer satisfied with my ten year old Toshiba tablet running Kode and plugged into an external USB drive...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 05, 2015, 02:35:06 PM
Suddenly I am no longer satisfied with my ten year old Toshiba tablet running Kode and plugged into an external USB drive...
You shouldn't be. Having potentially thousands of movies accessible from anywhere in the world (although my outbound bandwidth might get swamped serving up more than one or two at a time), with an interface that literally a child can use easily (admittedly, one that has had her own tablet since her 4th birthday), and for the most part it all just *works*. They have their own DDNS solution (that automatically detects when you are on the local network and routes you by local net IP if possible), all of their apps transparently use it, and everything pretty much just *works*, no fuss no muss. My DLNA issues (not being able to jump around or pause the videos) turned out to be client related, it automatically set the drives up as RAID1, once I registered the product and set my "QuickConnect" alias, it simply *works* as a NAS and home media server, including over the internet. On *anything*, from her iPod Touch to her Alienware Alpha.

If I had anything to bitch about at all, it would be that they divided the remote functions between a half dozen different apps instead of just one, and I'm not completely sure even that is a bad thing; It is literally impossible for my daughter to screw any of this up, because the only app loaded on her devices (DS Video) can not do *anything* but browse and play videos that have been indexed by the corresponding server app. Even if she loaded the other apps, she'd need the password to make them connect (DS Video saves the login info, but other apps that are loaded get shared only the QuickConnect and account name, not the password).

No more trying to keep track of which videos are loaded on her PC, her tablets, on any of several different USB drives. No more pouting and fussing because the movie she just absolutely *has* to watch isn't on any of the devices we brought with us. No more finding out that she accidentally wiped out gigabytes of videos because she figured out how to delete the video she didn't want to watch the rest of before she figured out how to skip to the end. She can not delete or change those videos in any way. She can not even *see* all the other stuff on the NAS, never mind get into the administrative functions (I don't keep porn on the network, but I don't want my 6 year old queuing up the Saw movies). I can even set up a different user account for her (with permissions for only her directories), if I decide that I want to use DS Video myself while still not putting gorror flicks where she can get at them.

Whoever designed this app has kids, I'm sure of it. And everything just *works*, if I wasn't the sort that has to get in and fiddle with stuff, I would have been done messing with it in about an hour (except for copying files, the bad thing about WD Greens is that they are *slooooow*), with no more technical skill required than it takes to use Office.

And with only a bit more knowledge required, I have a remote Torrent box I can access via HTTPS from anywhere in the world, and a VPN host I could configure to hop ports faster than my university IT staff would be able to identify. It's fucking beautiful, it does everything I was doing with that ancient Dell box running Ubuntu, but better and generally with only a few clicks instead of endless fiddling. It's not particularly beefy hardware, but I threw the worst realistic case I could come up with at it (saving 40 GB of files being transferred by SFTP as fast as the drives could write them while serving up 2 1080P movies over HTTPS and downloading 10 torrents simultaneously) and the CPU only got to 60-65%.

It'll do. Quit fiddling with USB thumb drives, get one of these.

--Dave

EDIT: And after that glowing testimonial, I have to add this little caution; Do doublecheck the meta-data the automated process picks for the videos. "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" somehow wound up with the meta-data for "White Man's Revenge 2". That could have been...extremely awkward (although it was just meta-data, if you clicked on it you got the right movie). I was tempted to put the cover image in here, but I think this thread is supposed to be SFW. So I will just link it on a site that won't set the firewall alarms ringing (linked page is still NSFW): http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=7263030&style=ice


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 07, 2015, 09:35:29 AM
Good sales pitch.

I've managed to locate the Startup directory on Win 2012, which is great.  Now I'm looking for something that I have never ever looked for on a Microsoft OS: a Shutdown directory.  Does this exist?  If you haven't guessed, I want some commands processed before a OS halt on Win2012.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 07, 2015, 12:54:14 PM
There isn't a shutdown directory, but you can use GPO to run scripts at logon and logoff.

TechNet article on it. (https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc783802%28v=ws.10%29.aspx)  Of course this assumes you're using Active Directory.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 07, 2015, 01:05:13 PM
It's a standalone 2012 machine.  Stupid Bill Gates.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 07, 2015, 01:40:20 PM
It's a standalone 2012 machine.  Stupid Bill Gates.

The vast majority of Group Policy is available through the local group policy editor for stand alone machines.

Just open the run prompt and enter "gpedit.msc" which will open the Local Group Policy Editor window. In the Computer Configuration section there is a place for Scripts (startup/shutdown).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 08, 2015, 06:51:14 AM
Thanks, I'll give it a try.  Although I'm not sure if I can even do what I want from a separate process.  Does Windows have anything similar to signal processing?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 08, 2015, 09:40:32 AM
Can you give a rough example of what you're trying to do.  It's sounding more and more like what you want isn't possible without some creative thought though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 08, 2015, 09:59:51 AM
I don't know if it is possible in any case but some general questions arose due to my research.  I'm satisfied with the general answers.

Specifically, I'd like to have a Terraria server stop gracefully on system shutdown.  I figure this isn't possible simply because the program was not written to handle external signals, but I did then wonder if signal communication was possible on Windows at all, from an academic perspective.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 08, 2015, 10:39:28 AM
When in doubt, check to see if it can be done in PowerShell.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 08, 2015, 11:17:36 AM
Ah.  That would entirely depend on whether a running Terraria server can accept input from the command line.  More than likely not.  (It would require reserving ports for communication or having some kind of helper app running, and most Windows programs just don't do that.)

I see it has console commands, but that's probably from an existing window.  Because of that you can probably can do something with AutoIt.  Once you get an AutoIt script that can make the console window the focus, you can have it enter console commands to shut it down gracefully.  The script itself could be called as part of logoff.  So theoretically it is possible, if you're willing to use a third-party program to provide you the functionality through work-arounds.

I did find AutoIt invaluable for automating a lot of processes on Windows systems, including manipulating data in a variety of different files.  (Plain text, MS Office documents, web pages, command lines, etc.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on July 08, 2015, 03:22:15 PM
If it can be piped into a command line, it's really easy, assuming a graceful shutdown.

Because all you'll need in that instance is a damn batch file, right ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on July 08, 2015, 03:54:29 PM
I don't know anything about what you need to do to shut down a terraria server, but even if it doesn't accept console commands, I'd imagine you could have a powershell script that runs an AHK macro before logoff that emulates the mouseclicks and button presses that are needed to shut the server down. Kind of a fiddly hack, but if you're willing to set it up it should be able to do pretty much anything short of any active logic or decision making.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 08, 2015, 06:16:08 PM
Well, this conversation is already much more productive than any of my other technical questions.

So, TerrariaServer.exe does indeed pop a console window into which commands can be typed.  In fact, without editing the config file, you have to enter some parameters just to get it going.  After editing the conf file, it pretty much just pops up a console window which acts as STDIN/STDOUT (does Win have STDERR?).  It then will sit there, waiting on you to type "exit" which saves the world and quits.  If not for the required step of saving the world, I'd pretty much say "fuck it".

Sounds like "piping to a command line" is a thing in... what?  CMD.EXE?  Powershell (which is POSIX compliant)?  Maybe not what I need here but I'd like to see an example of whatever Ironwood was talking about.  I might be thinking of it incorrectly, but I'd love a batch file (in the Shutdown gpedit thing) which would tell TerrariaServer.exe to "exit" so it would save the world state before dying.

Or a proper linux port. :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 08, 2015, 07:37:08 PM
In a CMD (or powershell) window, type the following:

C:\<DIRECTORY THAT TERRARIA IS IN>\terraria.exe /?

Typically that will tell you what command line switches you can run with the exe. From the sound of the behavior you mentioned, it probably will take a terraria.exe /exit command directly from the command prompt (you could even try that).

If that is the case, you can just put the full command you want into a text file, rename it whatever.bat, and then use the Shutdown scripts in local group policy to run that.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on July 08, 2015, 09:18:43 PM
The problem will likely be that the command has to be entered into the existing command window.  Once the first instance is running it's possible that running TERRARIA.EXE with a switch will work, but more than likely it will either say "Terraria.exe is already running" and shut down (gracefully or not) or it will spawn a second instance with whatever flags you have.

That's why I was saying use AutoIt.  You can grab the window name, make it the focus, then have it enter text or do mouse clicks.  (This way even if other windows are open and the focus, the Terrarria one is used.)  Presumably the Auto Hot Key that Goreschach suggested will too, I'm just not familiar with it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 09, 2015, 12:03:57 PM
Scary thing is I think I could actually do that on a mac with scripting. And I'm a big dummy.

But I had to do a thing like that once (basically what Lant said about giving focus to the correct window and interacting with it's menus).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 09, 2015, 01:38:35 PM
Yes, if this was not Windows then this entire conversation would not exist.  Lant's solution seems most likely, and I'll get around to trying it sooner or later.  Until then, I'll have to RDP into the instance and shut her down gracefully, which is only a minor annoyance really.  Having the OS trigger a world save when I told AWS to stop the instance would just be icing on the gravy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on July 11, 2015, 05:58:13 PM
I want to remap my break key to paste the text string: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

How do? Also, if you say Autohotkeys, just slash your wrists with a butter knife.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on July 12, 2015, 09:16:40 PM
what

edit: that post reads like, "I want to edit my ugly cousin out of this photo I took; what software do I use? Don't say Photoshop; I don't need any of that fancy stuff."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 12, 2015, 09:19:42 PM
He wants a keyboard macro so when presses Break it types out "¯\_(ツ)_/¯".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 12, 2015, 09:54:10 PM
He wants a keyboard macro so when presses Break it types out "¯\_(ツ)_/¯".

He wants a programmable keyboard, but since he insists on using mechanicals, I don't believe such a beast exists. It's Auto Hotkeys, or something equivalent. I used to use a clip-board utility that might be able to do what he wants, but now I can't even remember the name of it.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 13, 2015, 06:59:52 AM
Am I allowed to say "shell aliases" instead of AutoHotkeys?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 17, 2015, 03:41:35 PM
Probably not the right place, but it's tech related, so...

Fitbit - my wife wants one. She's been using the app on her phone and she's a pretty active person. Pros/cons? Model differences?

Any advice is helpful! Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 17, 2015, 03:43:38 PM
Why does she want one? Or, stated another way, what is she trying to track?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 17, 2015, 03:46:22 PM
That's a great question.

She's been good about putting her calories in the app, along with her exercise info. The app already seems to calculate steps and such, so I'm not sure what else the wristband is providing that the app on her phone isn't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on July 17, 2015, 08:57:17 PM
It can count steps without the phone (maybe more accurate) and I think it does something with sleep cycles too. But with the stuff in the phone, if she always carries it, she probably doesn't need a wrist band. I'd give you mine but I think my wife wants to use it for some reason.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2015, 08:29:08 PM
I don't like the whole steps thing. We've been using Runtastic's free app to track our walks, turns out we usually walk 3 miles in the evening. Also like that it maps out the walk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on July 24, 2015, 09:05:35 PM
It can count steps without the phone (maybe more accurate) and I think it does something with sleep cycles too. But with the stuff in the phone, if she always carries it, she probably doesn't need a wrist band. I'd give you mine but I think my wife wants to use it for some reason.

Yea that's kind of it. My wife has the entry level fitbit and likes it. It's not even a wristband, but a belt clip. Woe be the days she forgets to put it on :-). But my iPhone 6 does all the same stuff and I'm usually carrying it around anyway. There's also an app for sleep cycles.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 26, 2015, 05:23:56 PM
DNS Servers: My ISP's DNS is prone to bouts of flakiness, where suddenly it just stops responding for a minute at a time or more. Although I can work around this by configuring each device to use the Google DNS servers as backups, they will first wait for my ISP's to time out, and they (the google servers) are fairly slow to respond themselves. What I would like to do is configure a DNS server on my NAS, but as this is not something I have ever messed with before, I don't know where to start. It seems like the normal use for this is designed to be the DNS server for a domain, forwarding routing information to other DNS servers, I don't need this, I just need it to provide DNS lookups for systems on my LAN.

Any pointers, even a link to a *useful* "How do I?" listicle would help?

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 26, 2015, 06:27:25 PM
Have you checked your router to see if you can set the DNS servers given out via DHCP in the DHCP options?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 26, 2015, 06:37:23 PM
Have you checked your router to see if you can set the DNS servers given out via DHCP in the DHCP options?
Yeah, not possible, it's hardwired to get them from the ISP's DNS servers.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 27, 2015, 09:40:50 AM
I don't want to be That Guy, but what is the reason to not use Google DNS as primary?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 27, 2015, 11:13:35 AM
I don't want to be That Guy, but what is the reason to not use Google DNS as primary?

I misread his post, I thought that is what he was doing but was not wanting to do it manually.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 27, 2015, 11:17:20 AM
More toward the question, my ISP-supplied gateway does not have any facility to change the DNS servers, which is expected since that's how AT+T keeps some control of where you go.  I had to alter the DNS entries on individual equipment.  I believe this was easier than setting up my own DNS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 27, 2015, 11:42:40 AM
Get your own router and change the DNS servers in the DHCP settings in there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 27, 2015, 12:55:57 PM
Get your own router and change the DNS servers in the DHCP settings in there.

Tried that, unfortunately, that breaks the TV receivers (yes, they're on the same network, unfortunately they won't work if I put the modem into Pass-Through mode, even if they are plugged into the modem and not the overall network). I think I got it working, I set up the NAS' DNS server to operate in 'Forwarding' mode, with caching (so it only depends on the exterior DNS servers the first time each 24 hours that it is requested for a particular hostname). Been testing it out overnight with my personal machine, seems to work acceptably.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 27, 2015, 01:35:36 PM
Don't put the provider's modem/router into pass-through mode -- have your router create a separate network. E.g. your provider's modem/router will create, say, 192.168.0.X, and your router will be on that network at, say, 192.168.0.2, then your router will create a separate network at 192.168.1.X with the gateway address 192.168.1.1. Your TV receivers can stay on 192.168.0.X but your other devices will connect to your router on 192.168.1.X.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 28, 2015, 10:42:35 AM
Well, that worked for the DNS problem, but the wireless TV set-tops went out and the DVR got flaky. They've got those things loaded down with all kinds of hyper-paranoid security features so people don't use them in a VPN, and apparently having two IP networks on the same LAN is one of the things that sets them off.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 28, 2015, 11:12:52 AM
Huh, weird, okay.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 07, 2015, 10:35:12 PM
So for the last two weeks I've been trying to upload a video to Youtube. I've used different resolutions, codecs, etc via the GoPro studio application.

Every time, it uploads fine, but then fails to convert after an extremely long wait. Any idea why, or what I might be doing wrong?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 07, 2015, 10:53:55 PM
Download a tool like Mediainfo that will show your container and codec info and post that info here:

http://mediaarea.net/en-us/MediaInfo/Download/Windows

(http://i.imgur.com/aiXz5oL.png)

YouTube can handle a bunch of formats but to make it easiest on their system you'll want your video to be in the MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 container type, with the video using the H.264 codec and the audio using AAC, MP3 or WAV.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on August 07, 2015, 10:56:59 PM
Is it a GoPro 3 or 4? I seem to remember that the GoPro 3's do some funny shit with their videos and that their MP4's aren't quite standard. You may find you have to convert it to a different format before uploading it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 09, 2015, 01:54:05 PM
It's a Hero Silver 4.

All the videos play just fine on my system, so no idea why Youtube is having a stroke when trying to convert them.

Here are a few versions I've tried to upload. The upload goes through, but they all fail to convert (whatever that means):

https://flic.kr/p/wc8H3K (https://flic.kr/p/wc8H3K)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 09, 2015, 02:44:03 PM
Still need video specs inscluding codec and container info.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 10, 2015, 09:44:43 PM
Trying again with more info:

https://flic.kr/p/wUSmDb (https://flic.kr/p/wUSmDb)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 10, 2015, 09:57:26 PM
Yeah...those are not standard formats. See if the editor tool that can view/edit that file can export/reencode to an MP4 container with the H.264 video codec. The audio is fine as PCM (same as WAV format) or you can convert that to AAC to make the file smaller when uploading.

For the video format you'll want to keep the native 1280 x 720 resolution (720p), for H.264 bitrate pick something around 5 - 7 megabits per second and keep the 16:9 aspect ratio and 29.97 frame rate.

For audio if you want to switch to AAC pick either 256 kilobits per second or 384 kilobits per second, stereo, 48 KHz.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 11, 2015, 08:13:37 PM
Weird - I was hitting the right options in the software, but for whatever reason...they were not being acknowledged. But we're good to go now!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on August 14, 2015, 09:37:16 AM
So I'm going to use the Win 10 upgrade to replace an old HD and finally move to an SSD+HDD setup.   Any tips for putting Windows on an SSD?  Should I partition the SSD or just leave it as one drive (240gb).  Should I attempt to move my user/documents folder or temp folder off the SSD or is that just a losing battle?  Basically this is only a gaming computer so I want some space on the SSD for games that need it and the rest of my library I can move off to the bigger drive.

Also I'm a bit late to the Terraria question but you should be able to start and stop it gracefully with a simple service wrapper.   You could try just a generic 3rd party one or just write a simple one in .Net and just send the save/exit command through standard input.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 14, 2015, 10:23:20 AM
The only stuff you should probably worry about tossing off to a spinning drive are things like music and videos which are sequentially read and the software reading them has significant enough buffering that you won't notice any change in performance. Those things also take up the most space.

Regular documents are, for the vast majority of people, going to take up less than 1GB of your hard drive space anyway.

I would just use a single partition, personally. (Windows setup's default partition map with the system reserved and recovery partitions is fine).

I have a 256GB SSD that I have had for years and even with all of the cruft (and all of my audio files because I was too lazy to move them) and iPhone backups made by iTunes I still have 60+ GB free.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on August 14, 2015, 11:03:20 AM
There's no need to partition the SSD (more than Windows does by default, anyway), and unless you're working with large video files there's not much point in moving your temp files off of it, either, they just won't be big enough to matter.  I actually like using the SSD even when I am working with video just because it's so damned *fast*, but none of my video projects are particularly large.

With a 240GB SSD, I almost never need to worry about having enough space, every few months I might go through and delete a few games I haven't been playing. I keep the bulk data (especially movies/TV) on the HDD, when it isn't on the NAS.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 14, 2015, 11:05:04 AM
Windows 10 also will be more space efficient than Windows 7 simply due to the update cleanup/compression of the WinSxS folder that happens automatically. No need to run the disk cleanup wizard every few months to delete years worth of superseded updates.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 16, 2015, 03:45:12 AM
What's the software of choice for recording these days ?  Say I wanted to record a hex game or two that I was playing ?

Why, yes, Free WOULD be nice...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on August 16, 2015, 06:57:42 AM
After trying a few things I found XSplit (https://www.xsplit.com/) to be the one I liked the best.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 16, 2015, 09:05:36 AM
What's the software of choice for recording these days ?  Say I wanted to record a hex game or two that I was playing ?

Why, yes, Free WOULD be nice...
If you have an NVIDIA card use their built in recording software.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 16, 2015, 09:53:12 AM
I do not.  It is an AMD of Evil.   :heartbreak:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 16, 2015, 10:14:11 AM
You could try AMD's Gaming Evolved client then (was Raptr):

http://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/technologies-gaming/raptr


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 16, 2015, 01:41:41 PM
So I'm going to use the Win 10 upgrade to replace an old HD and finally move to an SSD+HDD setup.   Any tips for putting Windows on an SSD?  Should I partition the SSD or just leave it as one drive (240gb).  Should I attempt to move my user/documents folder or temp folder off the SSD or is that just a losing battle?  Basically this is only a gaming computer so I want some space on the SSD for games that need it and the rest of my library I can move off to the bigger drive.

Also I'm a bit late to the Terraria question but you should be able to start and stop it gracefully with a simple service wrapper.   You could try just a generic 3rd party one or just write a simple one in .Net and just send the save/exit command through standard input.

I'll put "write something in .NET" down as a distant option.

I currently have 5 storage devices in my computer, plus a bluray writer.  2 of these are SSDs.  Obviously I would recommend just tacking on a new storage unit when needed.  I also don't like bothering with partitioning on Windows.  I'm not running a database or anything that might suddenly jam up my storage, but even so I keep things separated by physical devices.

I moved my OS from a 60GB SSD (too small) to a 250GB one using Todo Backup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 26, 2015, 12:45:34 PM
I have to replace my work laptop which is a bulky POS (aka cheap) Dell (with max res of 1600 x 900 on a 17" laptop!!), so I did some research and decided to get one of these:
ASUS ZenBook UX305 (http://www.anandtech.com/show/9104/asus-zenbook-ux305-review)

I'm a bit skeptical about using a laptop with a mobile chip in it (Intel Core-M) but almost 10 hours of battery life would be awesome.

If anyone cares, I'll report back after using it for a month or so.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 26, 2015, 02:06:39 PM
I have a zen book for work and it does get ridiculous battery life and is nice and light but we stopped using them because the workstation admin is a lazy moron and did not do a good job of testing and was having people end up not being able to connect to wireless consistently and getting blue screens when bit locker was turned on.

I am sure if the guy had a clue he would have been able to get the proper drivers packaged but he doesn't so now we give out Lenovo X1 carbons (which are nicer machines, granted).

The low power chips are just fine for performance, I was able to play games just as well on it as I do on my old home desktop when I was in Vegas for a conference last year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on August 26, 2015, 06:50:42 PM
I just picked up a UX303LA, also for work. I only unboxed it this morning but it seems solid. For some reason I thought it would have a matte screen, though. It disappointingly does not.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 26, 2015, 08:47:37 PM
I just picked up a UX303LA, also for work. I only unboxed it this morning but it seems solid. For some reason I thought it would have a matte screen, though. It disappointingly does not.

I don't think anyone sells an ultrabook with a matte screen.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 26, 2015, 09:02:02 PM
The UX305 is matte. So is the Dell XPS 13 (2015 edition, without the Ultra HD screen).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 15, 2015, 04:23:38 AM
What's the software of choice for recording these days ?  Say I wanted to record a hex game or two that I was playing ?

Why, yes, Free WOULD be nice...
If you have an NVIDIA card use their built in recording software.


Revisiting this discussion. I forgot when I recommended XSplit that I'd purchased a license for it back when I was making Elite:Tedious videos. That license has now expired and it's pretty much useless without one. The Nvidia Shadowplay is no use for me because it doesn't do OpenGL, and I'm recording Minecraft.

Any other suggestions for recording software?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 15, 2015, 08:15:39 AM
Well if you are used to using streaming software to record you could try OBS since it's free. I'm still trying to find something I like besides just using FRAPS. I have Bandicam, Action!, DXtory and ShadowPlay as well and they all have issues.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 15, 2015, 08:44:28 AM
I'll have a look at OBS, thanks for the suggestion.

I did get Shadowplay working by setting it to record the desktop then just switching Minecraft to fullscreen mode after starting the recording. Works pretty well and has much less of a FPS hit than FRAPS for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 15, 2015, 10:06:59 AM
Yes ShadowPlay's encoder is GPU-accelerated. However it's fundamentally flawed if you aren't using Windows 8+ since it'll split the recording into 3.8 GB chunks which is why I don't use it on my Windows 7 gaming PC.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 15, 2015, 11:23:44 AM
As luck would have it I'm using Windows 10 so that shouldn't be an issue for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on September 15, 2015, 06:25:14 PM
Have you tried FFSplit? Like OBS, it's geared towards streaming but can record to disk as well. I rarely see it come up in these discussions so I'm not sure if there's something "wrong" with it, but it worked very well for me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on September 15, 2015, 10:37:59 PM
Added to the list, thanks ezrast. The Shadowplay recording looks really soft for some reason, like the contrast is low or something.

OK, tested a few things out including FFSplit and OBS. Shadowplay blows everything else away for me simply because of the GPU acceleration. I can record at 1080p 60fps with it while anything else struggles to maintain 20 fps. Old CPU, modern video card syndrome!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 02, 2015, 01:00:42 PM
I'm trying to remember the discussion over password managers.  I'm faced with a decision over what to do about my passwords now that I'm using a Mac at work, yet W7 still dominates my home infrastructure.  KeePass is problematic.  I'd like to find something that will work equally well in both worlds... if it exists.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 02, 2015, 01:15:35 PM
If you are willing pay 1Password (+Dropbox) will do the job. I use it on Windows, OS X, iOS and Android.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 02, 2015, 01:18:58 PM
Early votes are for 1Password, and it has a converter utility.  I've paid for stupidier things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 02, 2015, 01:25:29 PM
Been using LastPass for a couple of years now on Android, Win & *nix. Not got 1st hand experience on Macs but have friends who use it on them and swear by it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 02, 2015, 02:35:40 PM
I'm trying to remember the discussion over password managers.  I'm faced with a decision over what to do about my passwords now that I'm using a Mac at work, yet W7 still dominates my home infrastructure.  KeePass is problematic.  I'd like to find something that will work equally well in both worlds... if it exists.

I use a product called "Strip Password Manager" which has Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS client and syncs through dropbox, wifi, or google drive.

It cost me about 20 bucks up front but hasn't cost me anything since.

At the time I was looking for password managers for iOS, it was the only one that properly encrypted the database on the phone according to several reviews.

Works great.

https://www.zetetic.net/strip/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 05, 2015, 07:25:27 AM
Data import looks like a minefield for STRIP, otherwise looks like a winner.  Need testing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 06, 2015, 01:11:23 PM
LassPass refuses to import properly, so that is out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 06, 2015, 02:33:02 PM
Ugh, poop. I have no experience of importing because when I switched to LastPass I basically generated new, enormous passwords for everything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 07, 2015, 07:48:33 AM
Right.  If I was just looking for something cross-platform, I'd be set.  Unfortunately I have years of passwords in a KeepAss DB.  I suppose I COULD manually...  :uhrr:  Still looking at 1Password.

However I can't see the in-app purchase of 1Password (Android) to take me to the purchase screen, so I don't even know how much they want for it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on October 07, 2015, 12:29:54 PM
Well their store (https://agilebits.com/store) says $50 for a single license for Mac or Win, but they do seem to be going out of their way to hide the Android price for some reason.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 07, 2015, 12:36:25 PM
Right.  If I was just looking for something cross-platform, I'd be set.  Unfortunately I have years of passwords in a KeepAss DB.  I suppose I COULD manually...  :uhrr:  Still looking at 1Password.

However I can't see the in-app purchase of 1Password (Android) to take me to the purchase screen, so I don't even know how much they want for it.
https://guides.agilebits.com/1password-android/4/en/topic/premium-features


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 12, 2015, 09:54:03 AM
Android Premium issue is unresolved but I decided that I don't really care since I already operate in RO mode on mobile anyway.  Bought the 1Password Mac+Win bundle and found a coupon, so it's working as I wanted for ~$33.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on October 15, 2015, 01:20:38 PM
This has me stumped.

New custom build. Put everything in, start it up. No display. Oh shit I forgot the CPU power connector. Plug that in. System posts to bios fine.

In Bios I was messing around with the case fan settings. Trying to find the speed settings that the owner would tolerate and because I was bored. Suddenly after saving new settings the system will not display after restart.

Wtf?

I ended up resetting the CMOS to get back to being able to boot into bios. Decided not to fuck with anything. Left it all at default. Proceed to installing windows...

Windows (7) looks to be installing fine. But on its first mandated restart of the process...  no display coming out of restart.

????

I could force a restart manually and then I could get display (along with "windows wasn't shut down" bs) but now I'm getting seriously concerned.

I finish the windows install. Get to desktop. Install some drivers in the hopes that things will smooth out. Restart the machine and no display signal.

I'm super confused about what this could be.

-Its not the monitor (works with another setup).
-Its not heat

-Can it be cpu / ram install/heatgrease/heatsink/seating/issues? I can boot in, post, see desktop, do things fine seemingly until I restart and then I'm fucked. That's not normally what I would expect.

-Can it be power? It doesn't act like any power issue I've seen and this is a rock solid way up for the job SeaSonic PSU.

-Is it mobo? If it is what the fuck is broken exactly? I'm using Z97-A/USB 3.1's AVI port with the cpu's Intel® HD Graphics 4600. This feels like where I am most likely to fuck up as almost every machine I've made or used ever uses a discrete card.

***

What should I test/try next?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 15, 2015, 01:29:11 PM
Quote
-Is it mobo? If it is what the fuck is broken exactly? I'm using Z97-A/USB 3.1's AVI port with the cpu's Intel® HD Graphics 4600. This feels like where I am most likely to fuck up as almost every machine I've made or used ever uses a discrete card.

***

What should I test/try next?

Can you plug into a different display port on the mobo? That one could be faulty.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 15, 2015, 01:39:36 PM
Do you see the lights on the motherboard and are the MB connector fans all spinning when there's no display output?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 15, 2015, 02:17:43 PM
Did you check the BIOS to make sure on-board video or either disabled or set to secondary?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 15, 2015, 02:19:31 PM
He's trying to use the on-board video.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on October 15, 2015, 03:51:28 PM
Quote
-Is it mobo? If it is what the fuck is broken exactly? I'm using Z97-A/USB 3.1's AVI port with the cpu's Intel® HD Graphics 4600. This feels like where I am most likely to fuck up as almost every machine I've made or used ever uses a discrete card.

***

What should I test/try next?

Can you plug into a different display port on the mobo? That one could be faulty.

Did you check the BIOS to make sure on-board video or either disabled or set to secondary?

I'm using the on-board video using the only DVI to DVI available. I'll take a look at the BIOS and see if there is any on-board settings to look at but again the mystery is why does it only give a display signal some of the time.

Do you see the lights on the motherboard and are the MB connector fans all spinning when there's no display output?

Yes the fans are spinning, the mobo lights up correctly and I have power to the kb and can turn on capslock/numlock lights. So it looks like it is making some progress but I'm not getting any display. However come to think of it I've never gotten the windows startup sound to play from behind the black screen, I'll see if I can.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 15, 2015, 03:53:13 PM
I'm using the on-board video using the only DVI to DVI available. I'll take a look at the BIOS and see if there is any on-board settings to look at but again the mystery is why does it only give a display signal some of the time.

If there's an HDMI out or some other output type, it would be worth it to plug that into another monitor to see if it behaves the same. If it does there are potentially serious issues afoot. If it behaves fine then it's likely an issue with just the DVI output (which may or may not be OK to live with).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 15, 2015, 04:18:56 PM
Yes the fans are spinning, the mobo lights up correctly and I have power to the kb and can turn on capslock/numlock lights. So it looks like it is making some progress but I'm not getting any display. However come to think of it I've never gotten the windows startup sound to play from behind the black screen, I'll see if I can.
At this point I would suspect a driver issue. If you mash the F8 key to boot into the boot menu and start up in safe mode (assuming you can see the selections) can you consistently get Windows to display the desktop?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on October 15, 2015, 04:32:21 PM
I'd make sure the BIOS is updated: https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/Z97A/HelpDesk_Download/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 15, 2015, 04:57:06 PM
If the motherboard is new, Windows 7's generic graphics drivers might not be fully compatible with it.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Engels on October 16, 2015, 08:54:43 AM
Yes the fans are spinning, the mobo lights up correctly and I have power to the kb and can turn on capslock/numlock lights. So it looks like it is making some progress but I'm not getting any display. However come to think of it I've never gotten the windows startup sound to play from behind the black screen, I'll see if I can.
At this point I would suspect a driver issue. If you mash the F8 key to boot into the boot menu and start up in safe mode (assuming you can see the selections) can you consistently get Windows to display the desktop?


Just apropos of nothing, if you are running Windows 8-10, safe mode can't be accessed via F8 anymore. Shift-restart is the easiest way, assuming you can get to the desktop. http://www.digitalcitizen.life/4-ways-boot-safe-mode-windows-10


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on October 16, 2015, 12:28:18 PM
I'm using the on-board video using the only DVI to DVI available. I'll take a look at the BIOS and see if there is any on-board settings to look at but again the mystery is why does it only give a display signal some of the time.

If there's an HDMI out or some other output type, it would be worth it to plug that into another monitor to see if it behaves the same. If it does there are potentially serious issues afoot. If it behaves fine then it's likely an issue with just the DVI output (which may or may not be OK to live with).

This looks like the winner. I need to test a bit more and also to make sure that the DVI isn't just being fucked over by some kind of missing driver / driver failure but using a VGA to VGA seems to have 100% success rate of displaying bios/safe mode/normal desktop.

You guys are the best, many thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 04, 2015, 01:12:22 PM
I want (possibly need) to do low-level PE work on linux lvm and the dumb-ass shit I am getting via google isn't helping.  Does anyone know of anyplace to get deep info on linux lvm, or can confirm that it indeed does not exist?  Also I specifically this minute could do with figuring out why I get range errors when trying to use pvmove to shuffle PE around.  The man page is not helping at all, and neither is google.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on November 09, 2015, 09:54:14 PM
Stupid question was here. Meant modem. Answer is no.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 10, 2015, 12:56:40 PM
That isn't even a question, is it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on November 15, 2015, 01:23:04 PM
I'd like advice on buying or building a proxy behind my Comcast cable modem.  I don't have enough confidence with Comcast to leave their wireless router as is without extra security to things like a sharred Time Capsule.

Any advice?  I'm not sure what to trust on the market.  Thank ye.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 15, 2015, 03:20:08 PM
I am confused. Do you not have a router behind the cable modem?

Also, for 70 bucks you can buy a compatible cable modem that does not have their wireless bullshit in it and save yourself the 7 (or is it now 8?) bucks a month for modem rental.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on November 15, 2015, 06:31:09 PM
We're using their wireless router built into the modem.  Bad idea?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 15, 2015, 06:45:30 PM
We're using their wireless router built into the modem.  Bad idea?
Yes. At best, it won't be very good at maintaining the network compared to a dedicated access point. The one I got from Time Warner, I could transfer between computers on my home network at no better than 10-15 megabits/second (between 1 and 2 megabytes) over a nominally 802.11n network that should have been capable of at least 10 times that much. Even between two computers hardwired (ethernet) to the nominal gigabit ports were lucky to get an actual 10 megabytes per second.

I put everything on a TrendNet gigabit unmanaged switch (16 ports and enough internal bandwidth to serve them all at top speed) and a dedicated TP-Link Archer C7 for the wifi, cost about $200 total. But even a $50 dedicated wifi access point would outperform the one built into the modem.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 15, 2015, 07:46:00 PM
We're using their wireless router built into the modem.  Bad idea?

If you are concerned about security, very much so.

I don't have any specific recommendations for wireless routers at this point as my five year old Cisco/linksys still does what I need, but for Comcast compatible cable modems, the surfboard SB6121 is great.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 16, 2015, 11:51:31 AM
The Archer C7 I am using for an access point is a full fledged gateway router. I had to reconfigure it to be only an access point because it was breaking the set tops in the new house, but that was because AT&T was doing something weird, it should have been compatible.

The C7 by itself is more than adequate for the typical residential setup, with lots of wifi bandwidth (up to 1.75 gigabit) and support for up to 4 SSID's (which can all use different channels), I added the switch because the house had ethernet pre-wired and I wanted to connect every port so I wouldn't have to mess with patch cables every time someone wanted to hook something new up (it's my ex-wife's place, I visit my daughter there regularly but I am not always around to tend the network).

I set up one SSID for B/G, for the tablets (and all the other bits and bobs with built in wifi), another for N (so the systems that could do that wouldn't have to share bandwidth all the other crap), and another for AC (which only my laptop can use right now). It's covering a huge house, 3 floors and about 4000 square feet, from one spot (although I am not sure how the AC would reach).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 16, 2015, 01:57:58 PM
I'd like advice on buying or building a proxy behind my Comcast cable modem.  I don't have enough confidence with Comcast to leave their wireless router as is without extra security to things like a sharred Time Capsule.

Any advice?  I'm not sure what to trust on the market.  Thank ye.
Do you have phone line connected through your cable modem or just Internet? You can get your own cable modem, though if yours has phone those are harder to find, or you can get a separate wireless router as other people have suggested and use that instead. BTW you can turn off the "public" Wi-Fi access point thingy on your Comcast provided modem (assuming it's a newer one with that feature) through the Web site -- you can't do it in the admin UI for the modem itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on November 16, 2015, 02:45:37 PM
Is there a browser that's NOT a complete crashy POS??


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 16, 2015, 04:41:07 PM
Do you have phone line connected through your cable modem or just Internet? You can get your own cable modem, though if yours has phone those are harder to find, or you can get a separate wireless router as other people have suggested and use that instead.
Was just going to suggest this. When I cut my (cable-based) landline phone, I ditched the TW-supplied modem (and monthly fee) for a Motorola SurfBoard SB6141 (now Arris, I believe). Bumped my max Steam download speeds from 1.2 to 2.1 (over my ASUS WIFI router). Paid for itself years ago, one of the best tech purchases I've made.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 16, 2015, 04:43:25 PM
Is there a browser that's NOT a complete crashy POS??
Opera? :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 17, 2015, 06:03:44 AM
I haven't even used Opera so no idea.  Chrome works OK with 16GB RAM.  Godspeed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Soln on November 19, 2015, 08:28:15 PM
Thanks guys.  I will start researching reliable, secure routers once more.  Hit me with any other recommendations.  (Yes, we also use the cable modem for phone.  I gave up on wifi routers when the cable box's seemed more consistent than the DLink we had.  Wifi routers constantly seem to have their firmware going wonky or just going stale).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 19, 2015, 08:46:08 PM
You had a D-Link...reliable and secure are two words I have real trouble putting on items produced by them.  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 20, 2015, 07:58:43 AM
I have a blanket recommendation to install a 3rd-party router software (dd-wrt for example) on anything that will take it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 22, 2015, 10:19:54 PM
I have a blanket recommendation to install a 3rd-party router software (dd-wrt for example) on anything that will take it.

How much config is involved in putting dd-wrt on a router?  Do you just flash it and then let it rip or is there more than the usual amount of config involved when compared to setting up a store bought router?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 23, 2015, 10:32:08 AM
My experience is that it does work out of the gate, but you can do a lot of things with it if you want.  More than typical firmwares.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 23, 2015, 05:58:02 PM
Yeah, I haven't used it, but in essence you've got a stripped down Linux box running on your router, it's still going to be limited by the physical hardware but it's going to be inherently more flexible than the original system. You might have to turn off the FTP server to free up ram and cycles for the VPN host, or some such, but you get the options that are normally reserved for the 'business grade' versions of the system.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Shannow on December 04, 2015, 01:07:13 PM
Quick question on current generation Xbox One's and controllers, do they still need the converter to take a headset with a 3.5mm jack to work? Or can you plug directly into controller now? Seems to be some confusion on this issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 06, 2015, 10:56:37 AM
My dual monitor setup seems to have crapped out.  Booted up today and my main monitor was blank.  Swapped the DVI inputs and it came back but the other one is now blank.  I assume something has gone bad on my video card, but is there any other explanation for such a circumstance?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 06, 2015, 11:08:46 AM
Did you check the Display control panel to make sure multiple displays is still configured? Did you try different video cables?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 06, 2015, 04:42:38 PM
Yes on the first.

I doubt it is cables as I just swapped the two cables on the DVI ports and the originally dark one came on.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 06, 2015, 06:07:45 PM
Did you install a new video card driver recently?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 06, 2015, 09:41:04 PM
My dual monitor setup seems to have crapped out.  Booted up today and my main monitor was blank.  Swapped the DVI inputs and it came back but the other one is now blank.  I assume something has gone bad on my video card, but is there any other explanation for such a circumstance?

Well you've eliminated that either monitor is dead/bad so far. So next I'd want to eliminate that either cable is bad or that either DVI port is bad. If you can't find a physical culprit its time to start figuring out what is borked at the software layer.

So I'd take the monitor + cable combination that is working, then move that cable and that monitor to the other DVI port. See if it works. If not it sounds like the DVI port itself. Take a look at it maybe and see if seems loose or something?

I guess another relevant question might be if Windows is detecting both monitors in hardware manager?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 07, 2015, 06:05:30 PM
Ya, the control panel had both of them in the configuration.  I didn't do a whole lot but for some reason I booted up today and they both worked again so it is some gremlin. I guess I'll just wait to see if it goes down again before doing much of anything.

Thanks for the help.


EDIT: Lol, okay was just doing normal stuff tonight and got an error message for some application with a bunch of strange numbers and then the one monitor quit.   Restarting doesn't fix it, but shutting down and then turning it on does.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Lantyssa on December 08, 2015, 08:45:02 AM
Sounds like driver corruption.  You may want to try reinstalling or updating your video drivers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 08, 2015, 06:21:35 PM
Yeah I'd def fresh install the drivers for GPU and both Monitors at that point.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jimbo on December 09, 2015, 09:26:29 PM
Do we have a stupid hackers thread? Had someone call me and say his name was Mark Jacobs, phone number 122 771 2352, and claim he was with Windows security. He wanted me to log in because my computer was hijacked and attacking other computers. I asked him how he got past the firewall, the spyware killers, and the anti-virus program. I said I don't believe you are really with windows and he hung up. Pretty crappy scam, Microsoft has so many of these calls that they squish one and another springs up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on December 09, 2015, 11:41:48 PM
Unfortunately they work on a lot of people. My uncle, in his 60s, total techno-phobe, got fleeced by one a couple of years ago. Got his bank account drained once they'd completely compromised his computer and all his details. The bank were really shitty about it too and he ended up a couple of grand out of pocket. He won't have a PC any more.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on December 10, 2015, 07:00:08 AM
When I worked at Gamestop, every few months we would get an email about some poor employee who had just been fired because someone called and convinced them to empty out the registers and wire the money somewhere via Western Union. It's not even hacking, just social engineering.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on December 13, 2015, 11:35:57 AM
Which ad-blocker should I use for Chrome? Adblock Plus, Adblock, uBlock? Was running ABP and it unfortunately crippled PSN pages for me, so it got the boot. Since there are so many of the damned things out there, I thought I'd ask you guys.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on December 14, 2015, 09:29:26 PM
Adblock


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on December 22, 2015, 05:23:56 PM
I know we had some discussion here a while back, but I can't be arsed to search for it.

What's the proper replacement for the Greatest Mouse of All Time (tm), the Logitech MX518? Need something for my laptop: wired, with a good dpi and a few side buttons but I don't need a numpad on there or anything super expensive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 22, 2015, 05:38:16 PM
I think you meant the G5 but they don't make that one anymore either. I use the G502 now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on December 22, 2015, 05:49:31 PM
My G700 can function as a wired mouse (mine came with a cable that plugs in securely, molded to slot in so it looks like a wired mouse), and has better button placement than the G502, IMO. 4 thumb buttons, 4 index finger buttons, plus a DPI button on the middle finger.

Good compromise between bare bones and the insanity of something like the Nostromo.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on December 22, 2015, 07:08:27 PM
G502 looks good, thanks. I don't want to spend the extra cash on a wireless mouse I'll never unplug.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 25, 2015, 08:39:20 PM
Might be the wrong thread, but I'm gonna bite the bullet on a NAS or similar. Right now I've got a rather ad-hoc setup wherein my files are backed up via Mozy, some of my wife's files are (but only from her desktop, not her laptop), and none of my kid's are from either his laptop or tablet. I don't mind plugging it into my router, and plan to do all of the maintaince/setup stuff from my desktop. I anticipate 90% of the use will be from laptops and tablets.

Ideally, i want to set up a simple network share that I can partition off into segments (three private areas, a family area, and a wife/me only shared area). I'd really like it to be responsive enough for my wife or kid to do work on the share directly (working with files on the share, not syncing files to the share or manually backing them up). And since I already use Mozy, I'd like to be able to point Mozy at it and back it up remotely in case of total loss. (Fire, theft, angry person with an axe, whatever).

It's really about 50% storage to get crap off my desktop, and 50% "work areas for me, wife, kid" with simple and easy access control. I don't want my kid in my tax documents, for instance. :)

I'm pretty lazy, have no interest in building my own, so I'm basically stuck with canned solutions. I was glancing at the WD 6TB MyCloud Ex2, but I've got no real basis for comparison other than "price" and "reviews that may or may not be paid for".

Anyone got any recommendations?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on December 25, 2015, 09:33:51 PM
I've been really happy with the Synology 215j I got based on the answers I got when I was asking that question in this thread. The apps on both the server side and on Android just *work*, in addition to supporting backups from other computers over the LAN, it can back up itself to offsite storage, mirror OneDrive/Dropbox/Google Drive in both directions, sync folders to your systems, and bypass network restrictions by relaying everything through their MYDS site (their version of virtual DNS forwarding, it also supports various forms of actual Dynamic DNS forwarding).

It will run hosts for Plex, DLNA, and its own media management (which is pretty good, mine is set up to serve my daughter's movies). I also have it configured so I can select torrents from my phone or tablet, automatically launch the DS Download android client, start the download, and after finishing move the files to the Cloud Drive folder where they will automatically sync to my laptop, all from a university network that is extremely hostile to file sharing (the DS 215j is at my ex-wife's). I've got a database, a web server, and PHP environment all running for light duty Dev work....

The list goes on, and all of this was *ridiculously* easy to set up. I installed a couple of cheap WD Green drives, then just accessed the manager for it from a web browser and it was easy point and click from there. All for under $200 (not counting the drives).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 25, 2015, 11:15:00 PM
The EX2 is slow -- it would be better to get a WD MyCloud Mirror Gen 2 if you want one of the WD NAS units. The NAS benchmark that's probably most applicable for what you want to do with it is the Intel NAS Performance Toolkit (NASPT) Office Productivity benchmark which tests reading and writing small 1K and 4K files. If you scroll down to the Office Productivity benchmark on this page (http://www.anandtech.com/show/9705/western-digital-my-cloud-mirror-gen-2-review/3) you can see that the EX2 is at the bottom while the MyCloud Mirror Gen 2 is at the top.

The Synology is a good option if you want something with much more functionality and the price is about the same as the Gen 2.

For Mozy my understanding is that you would need a Pro license if you wanted it to backup a network shared drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 26, 2015, 07:20:28 AM
The EX2 is slow -- it would be better to get a WD MyCloud Mirror Gen 2 if you want one of the WD NAS units. The NAS benchmark that's probably most applicable for what you want to do with it is the Intel NAS Performance Toolkit (NASPT) Office Productivity benchmark which tests reading and writing small 1K and 4K files. If you scroll down to the Office Productivity benchmark on this page (http://www.anandtech.com/show/9705/western-digital-my-cloud-mirror-gen-2-review/3) you can see that the EX2 is at the bottom while the MyCloud Mirror Gen 2 is at the top.

The Synology is a good option if you want something with much more functionality and the price is about the same as the Gen 2.

For Mozy my understanding is that you would need a Pro license if you wanted it to backup a network shared drive.

Of course you do, because only businesses have NAS right? Ugh.

That's exactly the sort of advice I was looking for, though. Thanks!

What's the point of the USB 3.0 ports on the back? For an external drive for additional backup? (Actually not a bad idea....)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on December 26, 2015, 09:33:22 AM
Yes the USB port is used to add additional storage or as a backup drive for the contents of the internal drives. On the Synologies it can also be used to turn a USB printer it a network printer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on December 26, 2015, 10:53:55 AM
Oh, and for security controls the Synology is also fairly easy. My 7 year old's stuff is all set up with a different user ID, that only has permissions for the Synology media manager and the folders with her movies. It is literally not possible for her to delete anything (doesn't have the permissions) and she can't see the grownup movies even if she managed to figure out how to browse the folders.

--Dqve


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 01, 2016, 04:07:10 PM
I suppose this one can go here, doesn't seem to warrant a big thread to discuss it, IMO.

So I've got a 7 year old NAS device and it only accepts (2) 1TB drives max. It's nearly full and I'm looking at upgrading. Thoughts on getting a (4) drive NAS vs. paying the $60 per year for Amazon cloud drive?
I'm looking for storage of Music, Photos and backup of my Movie rips. Any other services I should even be considering?

I'm still seriously considering a hardware-based solution because over-time it's more cost effective, unless the cloud is truly "Unlimited." I've gotten 7 years out of my NAS and it only cost me $120, so dropping $200 on another should last me nearly as long. The only risk I take is loss of a drive, which has yet to happen to me in 23 years of owning a PC. (I think I might be due)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 01, 2016, 04:26:05 PM
A 4 drive NAS is going to run you a lot more than $200. Even the cheap ones are going to run you 2-300 without drives.

As far as just using a cloud provider or a NAS, there are pros and cons to each approach (and to a hybrid approach).



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 01, 2016, 04:58:25 PM
Derp, I meant 2-bay. I'd been looking at 4 bay at Micorcenter this morning and debated that because the 4-bay QNAP was on sale for ~$270 in-store. 

Synology was $219 for a 2-bay drive and I've got some 1TB HDDs lying about from the office since we moved to SSDs and the boss was just going to toss them. I'd be getting another 2tb for the price of 4 years of Amazon, and not having to worry about having files snooped in one of the Government's "let us just browse for a few hours" boredom runs.  OR surprise subpoenas because I'd uploaded a ripped movie I'm not allowed to; which is all of them.

4 bay is tempting but only if I look at seriously ripping all our DVDs to digital storage.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 01, 2016, 05:11:06 PM
I would grab a 2 bay Synology, then buy two 3, 4, or 6TB NAS drives (WD Red, etc.) and mirror them. Total cost would still be around $400 depending on drive size. Synology has the best operating software/features of all the NAS devices I have had exposure to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 01, 2016, 05:27:52 PM
Synology and QNAP are about the same and both are very good. I have a couple of 2-bay Synologies (213j and 215j) and am setting up a 4-bay QNAP (TS-431+) that I got on sale. With a 2-bay I would recommend mirroring (RAID 1) which means you only get half the total disk capacity as usable storage. With a 4-bay you can go to RAID 5 which gives you 3/4 of the total disk capacity as usable storage.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on January 03, 2016, 08:06:57 AM
I guess my "solution" of piling a bunch of old drives together along with a hub and some fifteen dollar USB adapters plugged into an old broken screened laptop is right out then?

 :awesome_for_real:

Cheap and it sorta works!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on January 05, 2016, 02:09:33 PM
So I'd been having screen tearing issues since I built this PC early last year. Finally figured out that turning on Win 7 Aero's window transparency fixes it...but it looks awful and I hate it. A shitty UI is better than screen tearing, but does anyone know if there's a workaround I'm missing?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 05, 2016, 02:21:46 PM
Enable transparency but drag the color intensity slider all the right effectively making things opaque again?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on January 05, 2016, 02:38:54 PM
It's like 90% opaque but I guess it'll do. I don't really like being alt-tabbed out of a game and seeing it move behind my web browser.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 14, 2016, 08:20:23 AM
Synology and QNAP are about the same and both are very good. I have a couple of 2-bay Synologies (213j and 215j) and am setting up a 4-bay QNAP (TS-431+) that I got on sale. With a 2-bay I would recommend mirroring (RAID 1) which means you only get half the total disk capacity as usable storage. With a 4-bay you can go to RAID 5 which gives you 3/4 of the total disk capacity as usable storage.


Thanks, I was leaning towards the qNAP. I'm not concerned with RAID arrays, anything REALLY crucial like family photos I cna't replace go onto the Cloud for free (yay prime, found that feature while researching)



I guess my "solution" of piling a bunch of old drives together along with a hub and some fifteen dollar USB adapters plugged into an old broken screened laptop is right out then?

 :awesome_for_real:

Cheap and it sorta works!

I considered doing this wiht an old PC, reformatting it and installing Linux to run the drives. However the machines I have draw so much more power than a device that I decided against it.



Anyway - current issue.  Something's up with my graphics card that I'm getting intermittent screen black-outs. This only has started happening in the last 3 months and the connections are all solid and working as far as I can tell. It occurs any time the card is under load and I move about, jostling the floor and case. I think the problem is the Nvidia card is very large and unsupported, so when it's running it heats up and is flexing, losing connection in the PCI slot.  I can see some visible flex in the card itself that lends weight to this theory. I can't think of anything else it might be, either. (It's an Nvidia 760 if I remember right)

Any Non-jury-rigged solutions for graphics card support? Otherwise I'm going with the old popsicle sticks and paperclips method to see if that fixes things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2016, 08:29:22 AM
Is this in a tower case? If so try putting the case on its side so the card is upright to see if that helps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 14, 2016, 09:03:17 AM
It is a tower, yeah. Good idea, though I'll want to dismount the HDD and lay it flat since it's a physical drive, correct? I always thought it was a bad idea to mount those vertically.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2016, 09:17:59 AM
In the very old days you weren't supposed to change the orientation of the drive after it was formatted. These days it doesn't matter what orientation the drive is in as long as it's 90 degrees (and even that's not really mandatory) and you can change the orientation after formatting.

http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21533&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

Edit: "on the side" positioning:

WDC NAS
(http://i.imgur.com/4qJ40ay.jpg)

PS4
(http://i.imgur.com/ILSS2BH.png)


"On the end" positioning:

USB drive dock
(http://i.imgur.com/R09YFKv.png)

Apple Time Capsule (hard drive inside)
(http://i.imgur.com/pDDEQL3.jpg)





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 14, 2016, 10:31:22 AM
How would changing the orientation of the video card help? Just because it might be flexing?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2016, 10:42:20 AM
In many cases the case PCI(e) slot openings aren't aligned properly with the motherboard PCI(e) slots and a number of potentially bad things can happen. One is the card doesn't sit down all the way into the slot. I.e. the case slots are slightly higher than what the motherboard expects so the card is partially "suspended" above the slot. Another problem is openings and "floor" of the case where the motherboard is screwed into aren't at exactly 90 degrees and when you screw the card into the slot opening the end of the card furthest from the slot opening pops up out of the slot. The reverse can also be true where the end closest to the slot opening sticks up out of the slot.

If the above is true resting the case so the card is vertical let's gravity do some of the work in keeping the card in the slot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on January 15, 2016, 05:55:43 PM
So, this isn't a quick tech question, but more of a WTF do I tell them beyond "you're screwed"?

My wife is an attorney; her firm is winding down the current practice and is being acquired by an out-of-state firm looking to build their business in WA. The IT guy quit a few weeks ago and they have to move offices in the next 3-4 days. I don't know what happened, but the server move and hosting service fell through. So they're looking for ideas on what to do with a server rack that needs to be maintained for access to old case files and they need a decision in the next day or two. The new firm refuses to have anything to do with the existing server, based on separation of client bases.

So I'm thinking:

A: Hire someone to upload the stack into AWS or Rackspace and have it hosted there, but they're balking at potential security problems on that.

B: Hire someone to physically move the server, set it back up with hosting and keep it maintained like in a server farm? I'm not even sure of what or who would do that.

If anyone has any ideas to get started, please let me know. This is clownshoes and if it wasn't my wife's job this is attached to I'd calmly step back away.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 15, 2016, 08:04:49 PM
What city is this and how many servers and how much storage are we talking about here?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on January 15, 2016, 08:30:38 PM
Seattle.
Appears to be one or two server blades.
I don't know how much storage. Maybe 1-5 TB?

They sent me a crappy pic but it's a side-angle so I have no idea really what is there.  It looks like a 7' rack but only half of it is actually used. Maybe 4 small boxes on the top which I'd guess are switches or routers of some sort based on size and the 10+ ethernet cables coming from the front of each. On the bottom are another 4 larger width boxes which appear to be the server blades and/or storage array.

I don't even know how old it is, which might have helped determine rough specs. I'm really coming at this from a top-level view.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 15, 2016, 08:35:53 PM
Are there any apps that run on these or are they really just file servers? Is this Windows and/or Unix/Linux? Are the servers currently connected to the Internet (public IPs) or only accessible on the intranet?

Edit: also how much upload bandwidth do these servers have access to?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 15, 2016, 08:58:46 PM
Also, if they know, are the applications running on this equipment already virtualized with VMware or Hyper-V or are these individual physical servers? If it is already virtualized, moving it to one of the vendor's public clouds is relatively easy. A lot of companies and government organizations have their data in cloud providers these days (including HIPPA stuff) when it comes to data security those providers are actually pretty good. I would actually be more concerned about the security of a one-off rack of servers/storage in some office than at a cloud provider.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on January 15, 2016, 10:50:10 PM
I really don't know any of these answers, though I'm 95% positive they're Internet connected, as my wife can VPN into her work system. I can't imagine they're using any other cloud-based systems, only that primary server to do all that work. I also assume the server/s are used primarily for file servers to house their case histories.

What these questions really hammer home is that they need to just suck it up and hire someone ASAP to handle. I suspect they balked at the cost of the quotes they received and never bothered to follow up with contracting the service.

Much appreciated for the list of questions - it's not in my wheelhouse, and it's not in theirs. At the very least I can tell them to get some contracted help. What type of service should I refer them to? General IT, or are there folks that specialize in this sort of thing?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 15, 2016, 11:00:49 PM
Most general IT shops should be able to handle something like this or know who to forward them to, especially in a market as big as Seattle.

Last minute is going to cost them probably twice what they got quoted.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on January 15, 2016, 11:20:09 PM
Thank you both for your time and expertise. I really appreciate the assist.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on January 20, 2016, 10:21:31 AM
So is there a simple program that will assist me in speed checking all the links of my home network, other than just timing the time it takes to move a test file back and forth?

I'm not looking to be overwhelmed with information, just speed check and maybe packet loss as I play with network configurations.

Must be able to handle transfers between Android and Windows devices.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 20, 2016, 01:23:37 PM
Do you have multiple routers/ switches set-up on your home network that it's an issue?  When I set mine up all I had to make certain of was that my wiring was good for Gigabit between the wall and the Patch panel. (Wired right, all copper touching) That involved a physical device to test the wires.

Once that was good, I had to make sure the switch was set-up properly and patch-in. Since the switch is gigabit that handles the speed there just fine. I'm only talking between local devices so I don't need to ping/ tracert/ etc. One 42-port switch and done.

After that it's all about how fast your ethernet cards, memory buffer and write speed are on the devices in question. (My old 7000rpm hdd on the old PC will be much slower than the 10,000rpm HDD on the new one which is slower than SSD)

Am I wrong on that or am I missing something else in this equation?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on January 20, 2016, 01:36:16 PM
I'm talking wireless transfer speeds and reliability in particular. I was hoping that there was a simple speedtest like app that would, for instance, move a test file between machines and give me a reading of the actual average bandwidth. Right now I'm using a stopwatch and a 67 meg test file.

As for my home network, well it's a hodgepodge of old laptops and tablets and usb hubs that would be thrown off the Serenity for being too junky.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 20, 2016, 05:18:48 PM
The stopwatch is probably the cheapest route. The other speed test apps I know of hit the internet rather than stay local. Make sure you use the same device for all of your tests or you will see variances in how each OS/device handles the files rather than just network throughput.

You could try something like this on your laptop: http://www.totusoft.com/lanspeed1.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 20, 2016, 05:46:27 PM
Android has an app that our sysadmin found via Reddit r/sysadmin.  No iPhone version so I don't know the name. It did signal strength and signal mapping for wifi networks and I THINK it did speed testing too but I'm not sure.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 20, 2016, 06:01:58 PM
Android has an app that our sysadmin found via Reddit r/sysadmin.  No iPhone version so I don't know the name. It did signal strength and signal mapping for wifi networks and I THINK it did speed testing too but I'm not sure.

Apple changed their iOS SDK/APIs a long time ago to stop apps like that from working (in iOS 5 or 6).

NetStumbler is a Windows application that does wifi mapping.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on January 20, 2016, 08:43:15 PM
The stopwatch is probably the cheapest route. The other speed test apps I know of hit the internet rather than stay local. Make sure you use the same device for all of your tests or you will see variances in how each OS/device handles the files rather than just network throughput.

You could try something like this on your laptop: http://www.totusoft.com/lanspeed1.html


Thanks. That looks to be just the thing, at least for the Windows side of the network. Speed to and fro the Android stuff isn't that big a deal anyhoo...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 24, 2016, 06:46:00 PM
Here's an annoying one - I was merrily playing Dragon's Dogma on the PC last night. Said good night to a buddy of mine, and shut it down.

This morning, the box appears to be dead - nothing happens when I attempt to fire it up, no lights functioning on the MB. It's not the outlet, or the cord. As far as I can tell, everything else connected to that UPS is working just fine.

I'm thinking it's either the PSU or the MB, but I don't know of any easy ways to be sure. I could, theoretically, salvage the PSU from the system I built back in 2008 - it should be plenty powerful enough to try to make the system boot. I'm loathe to do this however, as not only do I not know if the sockets have changed too much in that time (system built in 2014), but the cabling is done up really nice and I'm not sure I know how to remove it.

Any easy ideas on testing either the MB or PSU? I cannot imagine it'd be anything else. There are no other apparent problems with the hardware, and the system has been rock solid since I got it.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 24, 2016, 07:09:54 PM
If you aren't afraid of blowing yourself up :awesome_for_real: you can test the power supply disconnected from everything but a few case fans by using a paper clip to simulate having the power supply plugged into the motherboard.

You need to short the pin with the green wire on the motherboard connector to any of the pins with a black ground wire using the paper clip.

http://support.antec.com/support/solutions/articles/1000015319-is-my-power-supply-dead-the-paperclip-test

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ojwcj-Alm_c (shaky cam and you can't really see the pins well but he verbally goes over what the article talks about).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on February 07, 2016, 11:39:16 AM
Finally committing to running about 75 feet of network cable to stream movies and games to the living room.

The question: do I need Cat 6 over Cat 5? If it makes any difference, the box I am running to is going to be using one of those Ethernet to usb adapters anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 07, 2016, 12:13:39 PM
I would get Cat 5e.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 07, 2016, 12:40:18 PM
I would get Cat 5e.


This.

If you are wanting to go nuts and run good Coax at the same time, get some siamese cable. http://www.summitsource.com/steren-772wh-structured-composite-cable-home-quad-shielded-siamese-cat5e-data-video-pair-coaxial-cable-white-combo-multimedia-wall-coaxial-network-cable-part-300772-p-8829.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on February 07, 2016, 01:15:31 PM
Thanks. I've given up on the wifi route for game streaming. House is just too sprawling. Now I wish I had gone ahead and just run net cable to every room when we were building (I did run coax, as it happens).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 08, 2016, 08:49:56 PM
I'm in the same boat.  Sucks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on February 09, 2016, 02:05:53 PM
My Radeon drivers keep crashing, even when I'm just sitting on my desktop clicking on the Spotify app. I assume it's a Windows 10 related issue as I didn't have this problem before upgrading.

Anyone run into this and figure out how to fix it?

At least it will recover on it's own, but nothing like a blank screen for 5 seconds while in the middle of a Rocket League match!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on February 09, 2016, 03:53:32 PM
This may be too esoteric...

I need a monitor upgrade and the special requirement is clear text while scrolling. So think long tall documents with tons of text and needing to be able to skim them while scrolling through. Some LCD's for whatever reason seem to blur the shit out of things as you use the mouse wheel to scroll. I'm not sure what monitor spec to be looking for here.

Refresh rate? Response time? Both? Something else?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 09, 2016, 04:09:45 PM
What browsers and OSes do you see this blurry text while scrolling in? Do you see it in non-browsers as well (e.g. MS Word)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on February 09, 2016, 04:20:12 PM
I replaced the old ViewSonic monitor with a temporary Asus decent-but-whatever monitor and suddenly the user had a problem I'd never heard of that needed fixing. Its been demonstrated to me, the text in both pdf readers and firefox is blurry when you scroll. Like there isn't even an attempt to bring things into focus until the scroll movement ends.

I believe it has to be a hardware issue because nothing changed at the software layer besides the monitor drivers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 09, 2016, 04:29:01 PM
What about Chrome? Firefox has known issues with scrolling and blurring text (Chrome does too for that matter but its not as bad). In Firefox there are a bunch of things you can turn off to see if that fixes the problem (Google on "firefox scrolling blurry text"). If fiddling with the Firefox settings fixes the problem then the problem is likely an issue with using the GPU to do text rendering.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on February 10, 2016, 01:19:25 PM
Try going to options>advanced and turning off smooth scrolling. It'll scroll faster anyways.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on February 13, 2016, 08:53:38 AM
Okay well *that's* an improvement -- turns out wired does indeed beat wireless, at least in this house.

So with the very simple network I've got here to start, do I really need a switch? I'm just running gaming machine to router, then router to micro-PC multimedia system (it's hooked to my TV). I also have an old laptop with an external drive attached plugged into the router to stream media.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 13, 2016, 09:10:31 AM
Okay well *that's* an improvement -- turns out wired does indeed beat wireless, at least in this house.

So with the very simple network I've got here to start, do I really need a switch? I'm just running gaming machine to router, then router to micro-PC multimedia system (it's hooked to my TV). I also have an old laptop with an external drive attached plugged into the router to stream media.

The builtin switch on your router is fine unless you need more ports.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 13, 2016, 01:33:26 PM
Okay well *that's* an improvement -- turns out wired does indeed beat wireless, at least in this house.

So with the very simple network I've got here to start, do I really need a switch? I'm just running gaming machine to router, then router to micro-PC multimedia system (it's hooked to my TV). I also have an old laptop with an external drive attached plugged into the router to stream media.
The builtin switch on your router is fine unless you need more ports.
If it's Gigabit Ethernet. If it's not, get a Gigabit switch.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 13, 2016, 02:16:45 PM
I might upgrade my 500gb ps4 into a 2tb system - any hdd recommendations in the sub-$100 range?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 13, 2016, 04:08:46 PM
There's only one 2 TB internal hard drive that will fit, the Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003 2TB HDD (made by Seagate, branded by Samsung). Fortunately for you you can find it for ~$100.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 13, 2016, 05:43:06 PM
Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 23, 2016, 06:21:04 PM
Since gigabit switches have come up...
I love my WRT54GL and even that WRT54GS a little bit.  However 100Mb is kinda crap.  Are there recommended gigabit hardwares which I might be able to customize via dd-wrt or similar?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 23, 2016, 06:38:21 PM
I think you would be a prime candidate for a Mikrotik.  :drill:

http://routerboard.com/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 24, 2016, 03:59:13 PM
Nice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 26, 2016, 07:16:41 AM
I bought a MacBook Pro for my wife. In setting up for her work VPN access, they're requesting she install Webroot AV. Does anyone have experience with the Webroot brand? They seem a bit pricey compared to all the free solutions I've used on PC over the last 15 years.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 29, 2016, 01:33:47 PM
I find it somewhat dumb that she has to pay for her own VPN client.  I do not believe it can hurt to try alternate solutions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 10, 2016, 08:07:52 AM
New power supply from the office last night, mobo is sending power to everything but I don't get a POST beep. However, I think I disabled that but I can't remember.

The monitors don't detect anything from the Graphics card or the MOBO when I plug into both. Any other ways I can check to see if the MOBO is totally fried.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 10, 2016, 08:10:55 AM
Is there a button or something to do a BIOS reset?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 10, 2016, 10:14:02 AM
I'm sure there is. I'll have to hunt down the motherboard instructions online.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 25, 2016, 09:05:35 PM
So I just finished my two-part upgrade (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=18439.msg1411271#msg1411271) to a GTX 970 and an Crucial SSD (last minute switch out). The card works awesome. Used that for two nights before having time to upgrade the HD.

I went from Windows 7 to Windows 10 during the freebie Windows 10 upgrade window. So I don't have a Windows 10 disk. But since the SSD came with Acronis True Image, I was able to clone my HD to my SSD no problem.

Well, until I booted to the SSD.

I've got the SSD and the HD both hooked up on my mobo (SATA 2). I got the SSD to boot. But after logging in to Windows 10, I get a flashing screen (every second). After googling, looks like a pretty common occurence. However, the most cited solution (deactivate two windows services while in safe mode) does not solve my problem. If I turn off those two services, my task bar won't completely load and I get a "memory 0x00223EF.... canot be accessed" error. This is whether I click/unclick/restart from normal mode all the way down to bare bones Safe Mode.

The two other solutions I've seen are the same as above plus removing iCloud (which I don't have) or Norton (which I never ever will have).

Has anyone run into this? Only things I can think of are:

1. Clone's not working. If it's not working, do I need to wipe the SSD, install Windows 7 there and then apply the Windows 10 freebie upgrade to that drive?
2. Clone's fine but the nVidia driver's not working. I assume either I follow the solution in #1 or I remove the nVidia driver from my HD and then clone again and then install nVidia there.
3. Clone's fine but I should disconnect my HD and just have my SSD plugged in.

The reason I haven't tried #3 yet is I'm paranoid. I've never seen this before and don't want to get too crazy with hardware. I know, I'm already knee deep in this, but I figured I'd ask before continuing :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 25, 2016, 11:36:52 PM
Create a Windows 10 bootable USB key, disconnect the HDD and do a clean install Windows 10 on wiped SSD.

My experience has been that a clean Win 10 install is a lot better than the upgrade path, it solved multiple problems I was having on 2 separate machines.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 26, 2016, 05:27:42 AM
Awesome thank you I'll try that later this morning.

Edit: got everything up and running. The computer certainly boots faster. But I'm surprised by the lack of improvement in Division loading times (loading the game and loading Fast Travels). The only difference seems to be as I'm running around the world. The content does stream in faster during that period, and the game doesn't crash if I turn too fast while sprinting.

Another question: safe to defrag SSDs right? I try and do that once per quarter at minimum. Probably dumb question but in my googling about the SSD issue yesterday, I ran into a post from someone who said don't.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on March 27, 2016, 07:35:27 AM
There is no need to defrag an SSD. The purpose of defragging is to put all of a file into one place in sequential order on the disk, which lets the drive read it in one go, without jumping around the platter.

SSD doesn't care where the data is, it's all solid state RAM (random access memory) anyway, so defragging just causes it to do a lot of writes. Writes are bad, for flash based SSD's, eventually they use up the disk. Although SSD's have reached a point where that isn't as big a deal as it used to be (they used to have only single-digit thousands of writes before Bad Things happened, now it's hundreds of thousands to millions), since there is literally no gain from doing it, don't.

If I had to guess, I'd say your loading times are bottlenecking on bus transfers to the video ram, are you sure it's running at x16? Some of those multi-card SLI's only have x8 or x4, although usually they can support a single in x16 they may need the BIOS tweaked to do it.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 27, 2016, 08:57:20 AM
Windows should recognize that your drive is an SSD and enable TRIM and disable "Disk Optimization" (which includes defragmentation) automatically.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on March 27, 2016, 09:21:05 AM
Edit: got everything up and running. The computer certainly boots faster. But I'm surprised by the lack of improvement in Division loading times (loading the game and loading Fast Travels). The only difference seems to be as I'm running around the world. The content does stream in faster during that period, and the game doesn't crash if I turn too fast while sprinting.

The Division has *horrible* loading times. I wouldn't use it as a benchmark.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on March 28, 2016, 03:13:49 PM
Thanks folks. So, no defragging, I'll deactivate optimization if it's active, and don't use Division as a benchmark.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 03, 2016, 10:14:33 AM
More of a security question here. I am trying to download a utility to hopefully unfuck my son's Kindle Fire (it is stuck in a boot loop of some kind). Amazon wants to sell me a new one, since it is like 3 whole weeks outside of the 90 day warranty (seriously, fuck you Amazon). I have found 2 or 3 different possibles, but they are A) hosted on Mediafire and B) (and more importantly) get scrubbed by my AV as containing Trojans. I am thinking these could be false positives, but I am not terribly interested in risking my PC to find out.

Anyone have experience with these? Or have any advice on how to fix the Fire that doesn't involve handing money to Amazon?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on April 03, 2016, 11:39:09 AM
Have you tried to do a factory reset on the Kindle? Or installing Cyanogenmod? looked this up, Kindles more recent than 2012 apparently don't work

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Goreschach on April 03, 2016, 08:25:24 PM
Do kindles have one of those reset holes you stick a paperclip into? Have you tried that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 04, 2016, 09:46:37 AM
No reset hole. Can't do a factory reset because it doesn't respond to any input. Just restarts to the Amazon logo over and over again. When I plug it into the USB port on the PC I can hear the connect/disconnect chime over and over as the PC recognizes it and then loses it.

After a feedback email in which I reminded Amazon that I have purchased quite a few Kindles from them (seriously, probably 10 or more over the years for my family and myself), I got a return email from Kindle support asking me to call back and discuss an exception to the policy. So I clicked the link, got a call, spent 20 minutes being put on hold various times, and was told they do not have the power to offer an exception to the policy.

So now I am on a Quixotic crusade to prevent anyone else from ever buying a Kindle Fire (the regular e-readers are much less shitty). Fight the power!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on April 04, 2016, 11:43:19 AM
Right, I have a friend who had similar problems with a new Kindle last week and she got a replacement yesterday. Keep trying, took her 3 phone calls.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 08, 2016, 03:44:12 PM
Anyone here know anything about making a podcast? I'd like to record and cast our D&D sessions, but have no idea where to start. I've got a decent mic but no idea what to use for recording/editing software or where to host that sort of thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 08, 2016, 04:10:13 PM
Anyone here know anything about making a podcast? I'd like to record and cast our D&D sessions, but have no idea where to start. I've got a decent mic but no idea what to use for recording/editing software
What platform are you on?

Quote
or where to host that sort of thing.
SoundCloud.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on April 08, 2016, 04:23:07 PM
Windows. 7 on my main machine, 10 on the laptop that will be recording.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 22, 2016, 05:34:13 PM
Random question: I just noticed my LCD monitor has gone...weird. The two bottom corners have these triangular dim spots. Everything still shows, but it's like the brightness suddenly drops.

I think it happened abruptly (but then again, maybe I just didn't notice it until my wife called attention to it).

Any ideas? Dying LCD monitor? Wife/kid/random bump to some weird NVIDIA setting or monitor setting? Loose cable?

Edited to add: This is a desktop monitor, not a laptop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 22, 2016, 05:55:35 PM
Picture?

Sounds like your backlighting is dying.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 22, 2016, 06:08:38 PM
Picture?

Sounds like your backlighting is dying.

Duh, I'm an idiot. I went to post a screenshot which clearly would not show the dimming.

Here:
(https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByxBK4zwKfw-TlZnV1U1Q3lmaEFfck1IbXg4Q1h4YV9zWkRV/view?usp=sharing)

I have no idea why that won't open. Clicking it in a new tab works though.

I went ahead and ordered a new monitor. This thing is a good five or six years old at least, and whatever it was was instant. I didn't see it this morning, and there wasn't any driver updates, setting changes, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 25, 2016, 05:32:39 PM
Yep, monitor. Now I have a new one. Which is a slightly different size, which is killing my OCD. I'm going to ignore the urge to fiddle too much with the settings, given how (in contrast) awfully dim my old LCD had become.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 26, 2016, 07:35:53 AM
Close to pulling the trigger on a NAS. Just getting tired of random bullshit and we need centralized storage. Do we still like the Synology (currently DS216j)? Probably adding a pair of 3TB Reds for price/tb sweetness, though my tendency would be to go a bit higher for future-proofing of cat videos.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 26, 2016, 07:54:23 AM
Synology is still a good bet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on April 26, 2016, 10:49:39 AM
The DS215j has been going great for me, the 216j supports larger drives (up to 8tb), faster CPU (1.3ghz instead of 800mhz), and has 2 USB 3.0 ports instead of 1. You can add external drives via the USB port and have the DS manage them, which gives you some future headroom.

The cheap-ass WD Greens I have in mine are doing fine, but it doesn't get stressed much (rare that it is streaming more than 2 videos). The management apps work great, but my university network doesn't play nice with them so I wind up using the web interface via Synology's relay most of the time. Setup was pretty painless once I locked it onto one IP from the router. It will wipe anything on the drives when you mount them.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on April 26, 2016, 08:24:21 PM
Close to pulling the trigger on a NAS. Just getting tired of random bullshit and we need centralized storage. Do we still like the Synology (currently DS216j)? Probably adding a pair of 3TB Reds for price/tb sweetness, though my tendency would be to go a bit higher for future-proofing of cat videos.
Let me know how it works if you get it. That's my next big purchase, and the Synology is top of my list.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on May 12, 2016, 08:29:33 AM
Soundcloud isn't going to work for podcast hosting; it's $15/month for unlimited hosting (free is only 3 hours :oh_i_see:) and I'm not ready to pay an MMO sub just yet. Anyone know of something decent that's free?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 14, 2016, 06:08:17 PM
We want to cut the cord again. But this time I want to give the wife DVR capabilities (we didn't have it last time we tried).

I'm not worried about the cost. It just needs to be super simple for her. I never watch TV. I'm eyeing the Tivo Roamio OTA DVR (https://www.tivo.com/shop/ota-detail), but I'm wondering if there's a better option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 14, 2016, 07:10:31 PM
Do you have a computer that you can hook up to your TV full-time?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 14, 2016, 08:52:37 PM
I could cobble one together. What's the best software/remote/hardware combo to get so she could use it easily?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 14, 2016, 09:39:24 PM
You'll need a capture device, preferably with multiple tuners, some software that can record live TV and play it back, and a PC with a decent CPU and lots of drive space (and reasonably fast if you have a quad-capture device). You'll probably also want a remote that will work with your TV software unless you are used to using a mouse and keyboard from the couch.

If you have a Windows 7 PC you can use that would likely be the easiest since it comes with Windows Media Center so you don't need any additional software. Media Center is sort of available for Windows 8/8.1 but the Media Pack add-on which you would have to purchase may be hard to get since Microsoft stopped selling it to resellers/distributors. Other software you can try include MediaPortal (http://www.team-mediaportal.com/) and Kodi (https://kodi.tv/) (formerly XBMC). Of those three I've only used Media Center for recording TV. I used other commercial software but they are no longer available (SageTV* and BeyondTV).

A capture device would be something like this Hauppauge PCIe card with quad tuners (http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_quadhd.html). I haven't used that particular one but I've used a bunch of their older products, both internal (PCI or PCIe) and external (USB).

For a drive you'll want a 7200 RPM drive if you are going with a quad-tuner. If you are going with a single or dual-tuner a 5400/5900 RPM drive would work fine.

You can also use multiple drives, though depending on your software you may have to move files over manually to the other drives -- i.e. some software can only record to a single drive but can playback from multiple drives.

* SageTV has been open-sourced but is looks to be kind of a pain to get setup and running now that it is no longer a commercial product


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Venkman on May 15, 2016, 04:55:44 PM
Thanks Trippy. I have an older box with a Hauppage device in it that I'd been cannabalizing. I'll resurrect that. If I recall the software was servicable. Came with a remote and the IR receiver on a 6' cable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MrHat on May 20, 2016, 09:45:25 AM
Anyone have any experience with those KBM devices for Playstation?

Some RL friends of mine refuse to play Overwatch on PC and want to play it on PS4 and I don't want to struggle w/ the controller and would like to use a KBM.

Has anyone successfully used a Xim adapter or something similar?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 20, 2016, 11:21:03 AM
Probably best just to find new friends.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on May 23, 2016, 05:50:31 AM
Anyone have any experience with those KBM devices for Playstation?

Some RL friends of mine refuse to play Overwatch on PC and want to play it on PS4 and I don't want to struggle w/ the controller and would like to use a KBM.

Has anyone successfully used a Xim adapter or something similar?
I used a CronusMax for a while to play Destiny; it was alright but not great. Kind of a pain in the ass to set up, and you need your PC right next to your PS4.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 05, 2016, 09:55:44 PM
Kind of a ridiculous question: has anyone seen anything about NAS made to shove SSDs into them. So you know, smaller, quieter, etc
 Gonna need at least a good Nas if not a full server for the house.

Boyo I know nothing about servers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 05, 2016, 11:34:25 PM
Yes there are but you probably don't want one.

https://www.synology.com/en-us/products/DS416slim#overview

That thing only has 4 bays so the amount you can store is minimal. Also the performance is not SSD speed cause Gigabit Ethernet. You can stick 2.5" SSDs in NASes with standard 3.5" bays with adapter sleds. If your NAS is mostly idle or out of the way the reduced noise benefit is minimal to nonexistent.

How much are you trying to store?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 06, 2016, 09:54:26 AM
You can stick SATA SSD's into anything that uses SATA interfaces, which includes nearly every NAS, but as Trippy pointed out you're limited to about 100 MB/sec by the NIC (60 MB/sec on AC wireless) and you can approach that with a 4-bay RAID on normal platters. Since you can stick the NAS literally anywhere you can get power to it (using wireless if needed), noise, power draw, and heat is rarely a major consideration.

There aren't many applications for NAS that need faster rather than big and cheap, so not many people have SSD's in their NAS.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2016, 01:32:57 PM
Honestly this was just a case of wanting a small a NAS as possible. Right now I'm erring towards one of the QNAP i5s or i7s so I can offload Plex duty to the NAS. But honestly, I know so little about which harddrives are worthwhile these days that I'd just be throwing shit at the wall to see what stuck. If I went for regular HDDs, I'd probably do 16-32TB. It would be the media center / storage for the entire house.

Actually, at this moment, I'm deciding whether or not I want a ridiculous box in a closet and have multiple terminal setups in the house rather than just a desk in one place. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 06, 2016, 01:45:21 PM
Get the 5400 RPM Western Digital Reds of the appropriate size.

If you want 32 TB you won't be able to get that in a 4-bay NAS unless you don't want any redundancy. RAID 5 in a 4-bay with 8 TB drives will net you 24 TB.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2016, 02:01:10 PM
Stability wise - which is what I really care about end of the day. What about this: http://www.amazon.com/QNAP-TVS-671-i5-8G-US-6-Bay-3-0GHz-10G-ready/dp/B00S0XRY2G

In Raid 10 with 6TB Red Drives (yielding, I believe 18TB). I don't know how any of the raid systems work btw, never actually bothered with it. Just cursory glances at pros and cons.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 06, 2016, 02:10:17 PM
Yes a 6-bay NAS with 6 TB drives will net you 18 TB in RAID 1 or RAID 10 mode.

You don't need a powerful CPU to just serve media. You do need it if you want do things like transcoding or fast encryption/decryption (assuming it doesn't have a dedicated hardware encryption chip) on the NAS itself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2016, 02:22:24 PM
I don't think I'm wrong, but I do believe if I'm running Plex on it, I need the transcoding. Almost all my files are 1080p+ at this point.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 06, 2016, 02:31:52 PM
The only benefit of CPU on a NAS is transcoding when serving media (when the source file isn't compatible with the destination device) and a full-up Intel CPU is overkill for that purpose. If you want to jump to the high end like that, the Synology 1815+ is an 8-bay that can be upgraded to 18 bays, allowing a truly ridiculous maximum capacity of 108TB (54 in RAID or Synology's own mirroring/striping architecture). Or the 2415+ is about the same price as that QNap, but with 12 bays (upgradeable to 24). Either one should handle transcoding.

And of course, you can always start tacking on USB 3.0 enclosures for even more capacity, but that loses you the single-volume benefits. You lose the 10G NIC (both Synology have 4x1G ports), but since streaming 4K video only needs 15Mbps (bits, not Bytes) that's not a real issue.

--Dave

Edit: And the Synology have hardware encryption, if that's a concern. If you really want the raw horsepower, and cost isn't a factor, then you might as well just get a full tower server,  fill it with PCIe SSD's, and some ridiculous server GPGPU architecture with 1080 GTX cards running on CUDA.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 06, 2016, 05:28:50 PM
RAID 5 in a 4-bay with 8 TB drives will net you 24 TB.

RAID 5 on drives that big is so likely to have a second disk fail during rebuild that it is almost as if you didn't use any type of disk redundancy at all. Rebuild times are astronomical even with higher speed disks.

And if you are trying to get 20+ TB of storage with some form of resiliency for a disk failure, buying a tower server that has enough drive bays and a decent RAID adapter with a good cache battery will probably be cheaper than a NAS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 06, 2016, 06:25:13 PM
It might be cheaper but it's also a huge amount of work. I've built two "file server" towers. One is an unRAID server and the other was going to be Windows Home Server until they removed Drive Extender and became a regular Windows Home box with a lot of network shares. While it was educational specing and sourcing the parts and setting up and configuring both it took a lot time and the servers themselves are incredibly bulky and heavy and difficult to move. My current active setup using Synology and QNAP NASes, while it doesn't currently store as much as those tower servers, it much nicer to live with than the towers.

Edit: and


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2016, 06:42:34 PM
Right now my other option is to just buy a goddamn server from Dell or something. But I know NOTHING about current server tech. I've allotted $2000-$3000 for this build including drives.

i_have_no_idea_what_im_doing.gif


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 06, 2016, 06:45:35 PM
I didn't mean to imply it would be easy but wanting 20-30 TB of storage while being protected from a drive failure is always going to be both expensive and not entirely simple to setup correctly.

EDIT: If that is your budget, something like the QNAP you linked is probably your best bet. Definitely go with RAID 1 or 10 if you are using that big of drives.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2016, 06:49:25 PM
You'd think it would be simple and easy to setup, because you know, it's 2016 and file sizes are getting massive. I expect I'll be waiting until a Kickstarter changes the way I think about immersion circulators network attached storage.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 06, 2016, 07:36:07 PM
I don't know about QNAP, but my Synology hardware setup was literally "Open case, plug in drives, close case, power on and wait for it to finish formatting." Took about 15 seconds to run through the basic setup after that, and Plex took longer to download than to set up.

Synology has a pretty turnkey set of apps for media serving, it doesn't get complicated until you start in on using it remotely over the internet (and even that wasn't hard).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 06, 2016, 08:43:54 PM
You'd think it would be simple and easy to setup, because you know, it's 2016 and file sizes are getting massive.
They are easy to setup if you buy something from a (good) NAS provider like Dave said above. However you pay a premium for that convenience.

Quote
I expect I'll be waiting until a Kickstarter changes the way I think about immersion circulators network attached storage.
The main issue is there still isn't a good platform to build upon that isn't proprietary/costly. FreeNAS probably comes closet (and is free) but it's still more of a hobbyist thing rather than a consumer-level product. Microsoft *had* a platform (though paid) with Windows Home Server and in fact you could buy WHS servers from vendors like HP that essentially did what you want to do now but they basically killed off that product by removing its one killer feature (the Drive Extender feature I mentioned above). MS is working on a bunch of "next-gen" stuff that in theory could be the basis for such a platform (again) but they've been working on it for a long time now and it still isn't finished yet and probably won't be until like 2022 before all of it ends up in the consumer version of Windows.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2016, 08:50:03 PM
boo


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2016, 06:33:37 AM
Set up the synology on my wifi router's wired lan ports and it's only getting about half the speed my wireless connections get. I forgot that about this router (ASUS RT-N12), I use wifi on my main pc even though it sits right at the router.

Any idea why the wired connections would be so much slower than wireless? Setup was about as simple as it could be for the NAS, but I got tired of waiting for the plugins to download over that connection and went to bed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2016, 06:43:23 AM
How are you testing the speed? How are the drives configured in the NAS?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2016, 07:37:41 AM
I'm just going by performance in general. My initial testing years ago was just Steam download speeds, but that's been pretty accurate across all applications.

When I set up Windows 10 (also last night), everything was downloading so pokey over ethernet I snagged the wifi adapter driver and shut off ethernet (I use a USB adapter: TP-LINK TL-WN722N). Everything was downloading normally after that.

I went to bed before getting to any configuration on the NAS. Just put the drives in, turned it on, set up the admin acc't and was downloading the default apps it wants to install.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2016, 11:32:37 AM
I'm still confused. As you saying your PCs are downloading slow over Ethernet or the NAS is or both?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 08, 2016, 12:35:09 PM
Is this the router you got from the broadband provider? Because those usually suck. I built the network here around a Trendnet 'unmanaged switch' (so called because it has the internal capacity to run every port at full speed) because the supposedly gigabit ports on the router that AT&T gave me was lucky to manage a total network transfer of 100 Mbit.

One of the results was that ethernet-to-ethernet transfer rates maxed at 4 MB/sec or so, while having one on Wifi and one on ethernet more than doubled the speed. A good Archer C7 WAP and the good ethernet hub, with the AT&T router only used for the TV and internet, seriously improved the performance (enough that the cheap WD Greens are the limiting factor with 16-20 MB/sec).

The crappy stuff they give out for broadband service is adequate for connecting all your household devices to the internet. If you are trying to connect devices to each other (for example, streaming from your NAS), they suck balls.

--Dave (and not in a fun way)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2016, 12:51:42 PM
Is this the router you got from the broadband provider?
Oh hell no. I don't use their cable 'modem', either.

So far I'm just talking WAN to LAN speeds, so far the NAS still isn't up and running for LAN to LAN.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 08, 2016, 12:58:49 PM
Are you sure that's a Gigabit Ethernet port? It sounds like you've connected to a Fast Ethernet port. What's the brand and model number of that AT&T router?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 08, 2016, 01:04:44 PM
He said above:

https://www.asus.com/Networking/RTN12/ (https://www.asus.com/Networking/RTN12/)

Specs say that it has 10/100 ports, and it's probably short on actual switching capacity.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2016, 01:24:31 PM
Wouldn't 100Mbps ethernet still be faster at downloads than wifi, when I'm only talking about one device on router?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 08, 2016, 02:14:37 PM
Not in this case, even theoretically, your router has 300 Mbps capacity on the wireless (dual band N) and only 100 on the ethernet. And that's ignoring switching capacity, many cheap switches and routers don't have enough switching to run more than one port, in one direction, at full capacity (where my 16-port 'unmanaged switch' has 32 Gbps internal switching capacity, enough to serve every port at max in both directions).

In essence, your router is a decent consumer WAP with gateway routing and ethernet switching tacked on, in that order of priorities. The ethernet ports are an afterthought, adequate for a printer but not ready for serious intra-network demands.

--Dave

Edit: My Archer C7 has an absolute Wifi bandwidth of 1750 Mbps, and in theory could overwhelm the gigabit capacity of the connection to the switch. But since my limiting factor is usually my cheap NAS hard drives or the broadband, and not that connection, I don't worry about it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2016, 02:27:59 PM
Neither here nor there, but I have never once seen a wifi signal max out it's speed or anywhere near it even under ideal circumstances with no known bottleneck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2016, 02:34:30 PM
Another pita: my copy of Windows 7 is an upgrade of Windows XP back when you could get 7 for $50. I only have the key for retail XP (the original key). This will not activate Windows 10. Windows 7 only gives me a 'Product ID' and the key is encrypted in the registry.

I am hesitant to pay $119 for Windows 10 only to have it give me problems when I upgrade my mobo/cpu/ram (the next candidate on the upgrade cycle).

I guess I could nuke this SSD install, go back to 7 on the hdd, upgrade that to Win 10 and clone it to the SSD? Sounds like a few possible points of failure as well as ending up with a nice new install of W10 with a ton of old registry crap and 5 years of accumulated file crap (which is why I wanted the clean install!).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 08, 2016, 02:39:45 PM
Neither here nor there, but I have never once seen a wifi signal max out it's speed or anywhere near it even under ideal circumstances with no known bottleneck.
I have gotten real transfer speeds of 45 MB/sec on a nominal 650 Mbps AC wireless connection from my laptop. That's the closest I've ever gotten to topping out the system, and since it was just about the write speed of the system I was transferring into (the source was the SSD on my laptop), I don't know where the bottleneck ultimately was. My general rule of thumb has been that Wifi is good for half of whatever it said the connection speed was.

I suspect that his real switching capacity on the ethernet is significantly short of even the nominal speed, by what he's describing. I overbuilt for what is ultimately just a residential network, but he's close to the other extreme. As soon as he gets outside of the normal consumer profile, the shortcomings choke his performance.

--Dave

Fake edit: Can't help on the W10 stuff, I haven't actually bitten the bullet on that myself.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on June 08, 2016, 02:57:01 PM
Another pita: my copy of Windows 7 is an upgrade of Windows XP back when you could get 7 for $50. I only have the key for retail XP (the original key). This will not activate Windows 10. Windows 7 only gives me a 'Product ID' and the key is encrypted in the registry.

I am hesitant to pay $119 for Windows 10 only to have it give me problems when I upgrade my mobo/cpu/ram (the next candidate on the upgrade cycle).

I guess I could nuke this SSD install, go back to 7 on the hdd, upgrade that to Win 10 and clone it to the SSD? Sounds like a few possible points of failure as well as ending up with a nice new install of W10 with a ton of old registry crap and 5 years of accumulated file crap (which is why I wanted the clean install!).
Just buy Windows 10. Or post in Useless Conversation asking if anybody has a copy or can get a cheap one from Digital River.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 08, 2016, 04:51:23 PM
Anyway, the TP-Link Archer C7 is down under $100 now, and by itself will be good for the typical residential situation and roughly a drop-in for what Sky has now. It's the low end of their business line, and mine has given me literally zero problems (I rebooted it once, and I am not even sure it needed that). Upgrades the ethernet to gigabit, gets you 3 channel N and 2 channel AC, functions as a gateway.

Archer C7 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833704177&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-PC&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-PC-_-pla-_-Network+-+Wireless+Routers-_-N82E16833704177&gclid=Cj0KEQjwhN-6BRCJsePgxru9iIwBEiQAI8rq8yphgdTeJiUSHgmWkOYykIDwncoXYQfbNyd_y-Op9VMaAqbS8P8HAQ&gclsrc=aw.ds)

I configured mine for separate BG and N networks so the tablets don't screw the bandwidth for the older PC's.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 08, 2016, 07:34:16 PM
Ok, I'll want the gigabit ethernet at least, so may as well bump up the wifi while I'm at it. Going to snag a TP-Link Archer C9 and upgrade my adapter to a Archer T4UH. I've been really happy with the high gain TP-Link USB wifi adapter, so may as well get something that can hang with the faster router.

Hope this 'free' upgrade doesn't continue to get more expensive  :drill:

And yeah, schild...that's probably the easiest and best solution this side of the law.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 10, 2016, 09:46:23 PM
Yeah, moving to 801.11AC: GREAT GODDAMNED IDEA

Srsly. Woah. Between that and the SSD, I'm living in the future.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 13, 2016, 09:52:59 AM
Also in the Living In The Future Department:
My son needs a new laptop since his is pooping out bluescreens.  It occurred to me that if he is going into tech (he is minimally learning Python and Robot C for middle school) that he should just go ahead and move to OSX.  I'm looking at MacBook refurbs but since this is my first foray into that arena, I wanted to get some opinions on where, which, and how much.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 13, 2016, 09:56:59 AM
I've had good experience with refurbed Macs. I've only bought directly from Apple. http://www.apple.com/shop/browse/home/specialdeals


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 13, 2016, 11:16:37 AM
It occurred to me that if he is going into tech (he is minimally learning Python and Robot C for middle school) that he should just go ahead and move to OSX.
That's macOS now. OS X is so yesterday.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 13, 2016, 11:26:38 AM
And yet http://www.apple.com/osx/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 13, 2016, 11:32:17 AM
Edit: Some of the new stuff in macOS Sierra:

http://techcrunch.com/2016/06/13/os-x-is-now-macos-and-gets-support-for-siri-auto-unlock-and-more/

(http://i.imgur.com/OUdJlDj.png)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on June 13, 2016, 12:19:42 PM
I didn't think that OSX image was real... :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 13, 2016, 12:35:41 PM
Edit: Some of the new stuff in macOS Sierra:

Ah, gotcha. I don't generally watch Apple hype. Good they dropped the X, but of course they had to find a douchey way to do it. Still hanging on to the iOS thing, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 13, 2016, 08:58:49 PM
It occurred to me that if he is going into tech (he is minimally learning Python and Robot C for middle school) that he should just go ahead and move to OSX.
That's macOS now. OS X is so yesterday.


So it is.  So.  It.  Is.

I don't like "Sierra".


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 14, 2016, 06:23:37 AM
We gon' get it. Probably a massive upgrade next year, all whatever Apple is slinging at the time. Should be fun.

I honestly don't give a shit about OS anymore, haven't for a long time. Horror stories of W10 and it's been fine at home. The only time I even begin to give shits is when it's so outdated developers stop supporting it. The worst was the switch from PowerPC to Intel, with a few mactards skeptical about this new chip. Sucked because it was before I had the reins of power, so we bought a shitload of PowerPC macs that year (I finangled myself an intel, even the Core Solo was better than PowerPC, and had longer legs).

God that guy has no right making purchasing decisions. He's old school mac, buys on emotion. And he's broiling because he's been completely cut out of the tech loop after years of incompetence. I'm no guru by a long shot, but at least I acknowledge it and try to learn and listen to people who know what the hell they're talking about (also why I'd be a good manager, hah).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 17, 2016, 12:38:43 PM
If I told you, "Hey, I want to move my company files into the Cloud and never maintain a local file server again" what would you do?

Oh, and they don't want to replicate a whole file structure on each local machine either.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 17, 2016, 12:42:15 PM
I don't understand the last part but Box and Dropbox do that sort of thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on June 17, 2016, 12:46:18 PM
If I told you, "Hey, I want to move my company files into the Cloud and never maintain a local file server again" what would you do?

Oh, and they don't want to replicate a whole file structure on each local machine either.  :awesome_for_real:

So.. they want a system that means their entire file structure is completely unavailable if the internet goes down? What I would do is tell them that they're fucking idiots and explain, slowly, with small words, how cheap HDDs are and why there is no reason at all not to have their files locally available.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 17, 2016, 01:31:01 PM
I am sure AutoDesk has a cloud repository service they want to sell you. And since an architecture firm is already paying AutoDesk taxes already, what is a few more zeros?  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 17, 2016, 02:29:38 PM
If I told you, "Hey, I want to move my company files into the Cloud and never maintain a local file server again" what would you do?

Oh, and they don't want to replicate a whole file structure on each local machine either.  :awesome_for_real:

So.. they want a system that means their entire file structure is completely unavailable if the internet goes down? What I would do is tell them that they're fucking idiots and explain, slowly, with small words, how cheap HDDs are and why there is no reason at all not to have their files locally available.

Yeah, there were guys in the room arguing this. Their CEO wants to be 100% cloud all the time though, so guess what they're doing!  :awesome_for_real:

I mean, ideally I can see how great it would be. No need to worry if NY/ LA/ Houston remembered to sync today. Also, they're a construction-management firm and the guys in the field currently have to FTP back to 'home' to access the file server and make revisions. This creates tons of downtime and a fileserver in the cloud would honestly fix it for them.

I don't understand the last part but Box and Dropbox do that sort of thing.

Box and Dropbox require local caching and they don't want that because its tons of space on each team member's machine. It also means if Ted didn't sync or was travelling offline and edits his files, things get fucked when he next syncs up.

Their users are currently using Dropbox or Amazon drive accounts to share files cross-country and the above scenario was outlined as being a problem.

I also get the feeling they're just looking to reduce costs and see IT/ Server storage space as a good option to cut. "Everything's in the cloud now. Just save it out there, it's cheaper than paying for hardware every few years and those guys who never do anything but fuck around!"

Of course, not having local-copies also doesn't work for CAD files with x-refs, but this is a C-level discussion and they wanted options.

I am sure AutoDesk has a cloud repository service they want to sell you. And since an architecture firm is already paying AutoDesk taxes already, what is a few more zeros?  :why_so_serious:

Yep, Autodesk has a few. There's A360 Drive that works like Dropbox and Box. Again, it requires local management and creates a local cache of all data you have access to.  With their BIM 360 Team and BIM 360 Docs solutions it's a manual upload process for anything rather than an auto-sync or URL to upload files to. Missed dollars there.

I've groused at their team about it before because this isn't the first client to ask. I said something along the lines of, "why don't you have real cloud service functionality?"  They didn't reply back after they asked me to elaborate and I explained a scenario similar to the above.

Then again anything cloud apparently local copies to sync from so vOv

Found this article saying a firm's done it. No experience with the company or the named solutions provider, though.
http://www.cio.com/article/2456297/cloud-computing/architectural-firm-puts-giant-data-files-in-the-cloud.html

Our IT guy suggested TNT drive which mimics a mapped network drive for an Amazon S3 bucket. This could work but I can imagine it's beacoup expensive. https://tntdrive.com/

Since I'm not a Cloud Services guy and the BIM 360 solutions aren't what they're looking for, I thought I'd ask what y'all would say.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 17, 2016, 02:56:00 PM
Do they want to pay the (much higher) costs to ensure their remote locations all have adequate bandwidth to be working on AutoCAD/Revit files over the WAN? Because that shit will get expensive quick. Putting Office documents in the cloud is nothing like putting AutoDesk files which are running into the Gigs each in many cases.

And when they get complaints from all of their draftsmen stating "It takes me 10 minutes to open a drawing, and 10 minutes to save any changes" they will have fun too.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on June 17, 2016, 03:02:50 PM
Work at my job stops if the network shares go down. Nobody is supposed to work locally, but to a mapped network setup. It's got impressive uptime, I admit, and it's nice (the automatic backups have saved my ass from a few dumb mistakes). But people just go home if the network is down for more than an hour.

Which does happen. And that's managed locally.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 18, 2016, 04:07:09 PM
Super big network or just poorly managed/ funded? I haven't seen network problems like that as a thing from anyone I've talked to in years. Weird.

Do they want to pay the (much higher) costs to ensure their remote locations all have adequate bandwidth to be working on AutoCAD/Revit files over the WAN? Because that shit will get expensive quick. Putting Office documents in the cloud is nothing like putting AutoDesk files which are running into the Gigs each in many cases.

And when they get complaints from all of their draftsmen stating "It takes me 10 minutes to open a drawing, and 10 minutes to save any changes" they will have fun too.

I couldn't even tell you if they'd considered that. I was in the discussion as a product consultant for Autodesk stuff and we're not supposed to go off our niche.

I dropped some hints about such problems, the Forticache option my old firm used and what the delay there was and how we had to increase the size of our network pipe. I also pointed them at Panzura devices and sent along the info about TNT. I think it all flew over the heads of the collective people in the room, though.

That's part of the beauty of consultancy; You aren't responsible for the bad decisions others want to make, only the information you give them. The Autodesk solutions weren't what they wanted, so they can move on and burn dough looking for their white whale. I'm not going back to IT where I'm responsible for the delay because the CEO read a Forbes article where a multi-billion dollar firm implemented a solution, so clearly our $34 million dollar company can do a smaller one 'on a budget.'   :awesome_for_real:

Though - there IS a good option for Revit files: Collaboration For Revit via BIM 360 Team. It's pretty damn awesome for shared models. If you need to do that take a look at it. There's *some* points I'm not a fan of (you can't host .dwg or .jpg links or your .RFA library in the cloud) but all of the .RVT work can be stored off-location. There's a bit-comparison tool as well so the sync process is actually faster than hosting locally. (seems to me they should put that in the base program.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 18, 2016, 05:41:33 PM
Super big network or just poorly managed/ funded? I haven't seen network problems like that as a thing from anyone I've talked to in years. Weird.
If I worked at a satellite office for a big firm and got to take the day off every time there were "network problems", I imagine there would be a wide variety of "problems". Some of them wouldn't even involve a pulled plug.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 18, 2016, 05:49:08 PM
Good point. I'm too honest.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 18, 2016, 10:41:34 PM
I'm not going back to IT where I'm responsible for the delay because the CEO read a Forbes article where a multi-billion dollar firm implemented a solution, so clearly our $34 million dollar company can do a smaller one 'on a budget.'   :awesome_for_real:
Actually, this is exactly my specialty. I take ideas from libraries with triple the budget and quintuple the manpower and implement it more efficiently, improving on the original idea most of the time. We're pretty much in a different class than the rest of our library system because nobody else is paying anything but lip service to real innovation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 19, 2016, 03:45:46 PM
Yeah my problem was they wanted the same hardware, capability and capacity for the smaller budget.

Did I tell you the story of how we were tasked with doing a broadcast with a two week timeframe? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 19, 2016, 04:05:30 PM
CEOs and CFOs keep hearing about how "the cloud can reduce your IT costs by 80% or more."

Which is true only of cap ex IT spending. In most cases, op ex spending goes up to the point of being an even bigger amount of money.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Surlyboi on June 19, 2016, 04:14:54 PM
Pretty much that. I turned down a job at a management consulting firm this past winter because they were looking to go whole hog on "the cloud" and none of the c-suite knew their asses from a hole in the ground about the potential ramifications.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 19, 2016, 07:32:04 PM
I kinda want to get into consulting. Convince suits to go with these trendy options, lots of buzzwords. Laugh at the poor suckers who have to deal with it while I go cash my checks.

That's my evil fetish.

edit: I was shoulder-surfing a webinar where they were explaining it might be too soon for libraries to invest in 3d computing (VR sets). Probably next year, once the market shakes out.

I was like...to what end? /jackiechan


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 22, 2016, 09:19:50 PM
Here's a weird question for folks:

Look at my avatar - what font do you think that is? I'm trying to figure it out for a separate project.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on June 22, 2016, 09:58:53 PM
https://www.fontspring.com/matcherator?matcherator_img=1qlfrupg8cska1e4rfu4goawijhalmzd

OR

https://www.fontsquirrel.com/matcherator?matcherator_img=3ak9r7g3yi6np7304l4gtdfxnclaj8wd#scroll_to_matches

No exact matches, nothing really even close. It's pretty custom. These might get you an idea though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 23, 2016, 09:54:38 PM
After digging and digging and digging, I think I found it:

http://www.fontspace.com/solar-sister/chang-and-eng (http://www.fontspace.com/solar-sister/chang-and-eng)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 23, 2016, 09:56:35 PM
Good job.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 17, 2016, 09:34:10 AM
Having some trouble with wifi signal in the front 1/3 of the house. We've got a few thick brick walls and a crawlspace that seems to be blocking signal from the front. Is there a 'cheap' (sub-$100) way to beef it up? I have powerline adapters that run up there already for the things that are hardwired like the PS4; am I better off trying to use a wifi extender or just set up a second router? They're pretty much the same price from what I can see.

Or, maybe simply upgrading to a better router may improve performance? Any recommendations would be helpful.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 17, 2016, 10:04:11 AM
Adding access points is really the only good way to deal with spotty coverage. Especially with 5Ghz modes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 17, 2016, 10:58:21 AM
A cheap thing that's worth trying is relocating your router. Friend of mine had similar problems and put his router in the middle of the attic. Worked like a charm. Most ceilings are wood and plaster, compared to brick walls.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on July 17, 2016, 07:20:53 PM
Similar situation for me, I've been thinking of using the powerline ethernet adapters to put an access point upstairs. But I think I might be able to move the WAP to a more centeral location in the basement and fix most of the problem - the challenge is how to run the Cat5 I have back toward the desk in the office (since it's also the wired router for main PC/printer/VoIP phone).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 18, 2016, 01:04:16 AM
I've been using powerline adapters for years now, they mostly work great. Only issue I have is that in this house we've got a 'workshop', which is a separate building from the main house, which is on a different ring main, and they don't work across that.

I have another networking issue. I'm running a small Minecraft server at home but I don't have a static IP. Every time my router reboots it gets a new IP and I'd rather not shell out £5.50 extra a month to BT to get a static IP. Is there an easy alternative method I can use so that I don't have to give people a new IP to connect to all the time?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 18, 2016, 05:51:34 AM
Use something like noip.com if you don't own a domain name. If you own a domain name there are more options available.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 18, 2016, 07:52:42 AM
I do own a domain name, pray tell me more about options.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on July 18, 2016, 07:55:58 AM
Some power line adapters have wifi transmitters built-in. Would those work?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 18, 2016, 02:31:18 PM
I do own a domain name, pray tell me more about options.
You are looking for a "dynamic DNS" service that ideally would be:

* Reliable
* Let's you use your own domain without needing to transfer it to them
* Has a client that runs on the OS your Minecraft server runs on that will automatically update your DNS info when your IP changes
* Free

Googling around I didn't see anything that had all of the above features. The two closest I found are Zonomi (https://zonomi.com) and EntryDNS (https://entrydns.net/help) (formerly EasyDNS). Zonomi doesn't provide any clients though they have an API and there are some 3rd party clients that may work with it. EntryDNS has a one-time $10 fee but provides clients.

Another alternative is if you know how to do some HTTP programming and your domain registrar has an DNS HTTP API you could write your own client to update the DNS IP information whenever your IP changes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Pennilenko on July 18, 2016, 03:05:51 PM
I use Dyn DNS for my dynamic DNS needs. They even have a handy client for keeping the IP  address updated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 18, 2016, 03:14:12 PM
DynDNS is good for this sort of thing if you are wiling to pay. They were the benchmark back when they were free.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on July 18, 2016, 05:27:41 PM
I just switched my router to wifi n only... The signal propagates a ton better and it's a ton faster.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 18, 2016, 10:29:42 PM
Brilliant, thanks Trippy. I had looked at DynDNS before but was put off by the cost. I can cope with a $10 one-off fee :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on July 19, 2016, 09:53:50 AM
I just switched my router to wifi n only... The signal propagates a ton better and it's a ton faster.

I have my router on G and N and I found the N signal didn't work real well in some areas, but G worked fine. Are you suggesting that by turning off G my N signal might be better?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 19, 2016, 09:59:36 AM
I just switched my router to wifi n only... The signal propagates a ton better and it's a ton faster.

I have my router on G and N and I found the N signal didn't work real well in some areas, but G worked fine. Are you suggesting that by turning off G my N signal might be better?

It really depends on your router. If all of your devices and your router support N on the 2.4 spectrum, turning G off will probably help quite a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 21, 2016, 11:36:15 AM
Follow up on the DNS thing. I signed up to EntryDNS and that seems to be working fine, although I can't work out how to use my domain name with it, but I can sort that out with them.

My (minor) issue at the moment is that to make it work I've set up a Windows 10 task that repeats every hour to refresh the DNS, and when it activates it pops up a DOS box momentarily... which takes bloody focus. Highly annoying. Any way I can make it NOT take focus from everything else?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on July 21, 2016, 01:10:22 PM
If it were me, I'd write a program that would run as a service and do the same thing (but without ever opening a window). But that may not help you.

--Dave

Edit: This link claims to have a workaround:

www.howtogeek.com/tips/how-to-run-a-scheduled-task-without-a-command-window-appearing (http://www.howtogeek.com/tips/how-to-run-a-scheduled-task-without-a-command-window-appearing)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on July 21, 2016, 02:07:11 PM
I shall play with that, thanks.  Edit: Seems to have worked flawlessly, thank you for your Google-fu! :-)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Furiously on July 21, 2016, 10:37:49 PM
I just switched my router to wifi n only... The signal propagates a ton better and it's a ton faster.

I have my router on G and N and I found the N signal didn't work real well in some areas, but G worked fine. Are you suggesting that by turning off G my N signal might be better?

It really depends on your router. If all of your devices and your router support N on the 2.4 spectrum, turning G off will probably help quite a bit.

WWDRT might also have been installed and wide channel option selected. I'm not sure what it all does but I get 32 Megabit connections through my WiFi. Where I was getting 6-9 at most before.

So also what are people's thoughts on the Nvidia 1060... It looks like a decent mid-range card. I was hoping the 1070's would have popped below 400, I'm sure they will eventually.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 09, 2016, 10:20:12 AM
Pretty sure I know the answer to this one, but in case I'm missing something obvious to you guys....................

My cheapy wireless keyboard is doing stuff like typing out c1`r\' when I press the r key, and various other keys are doing fun things like suspending the machine when pressed.

I've gone through all the keyboard settings, other keyboards seem to be working fine, batteries are good and no viruses detected, so I'm figuring the keyboard is most likely physically busted and I need to just throw it out and pick up another.

Thoughts?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on August 09, 2016, 11:17:24 AM
Borrow another keyboard, confirm that your shit is busted. Or just buy a USB keyboard if you don't want to put your fingers on someone else's keyboard, they're like $10.

--Dave

EDIT: I should read better: You already confirmed it with another keyboard. Yeah, your shit is busted, get a new one. Keyboards and mice aren't designed to be repaired.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on August 09, 2016, 11:37:03 AM
Keyboards mice and other peripherals are pretty much disposable. Just get a new one. Even a wireless model won't run you a lot.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 14, 2016, 05:46:17 AM
Keyboards mice and other peripherals are pretty much disposable. Just get a new one. Even a wireless model won't run you a lot.

I plan on being buried with my K95 RGB.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jimbo on August 23, 2016, 11:33:02 AM
I'm going to donate to the Goodwill Industry an old laptop I have, how do you all make your laptop or desktop ready to donate/dispose? Is wiping the hard drive enough? Dang I was reading up on it, don't forget if you donate a mobile phone to wipe it too. Now to keep reading...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 23, 2016, 11:38:12 AM
I take out the drives and secure erase them (assuming I don't keep them). But that's just me being paranoid.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on August 23, 2016, 12:44:54 PM
More of a PC question but I'm not building it so I'll ask here.

Anyone have a good site for budget laptops? Wife may need one for a new job (Yeah they don't provide, don't get me started there.) and the requirements are so low that it's laughable.

Quote
·         Minimum OS Version: Windows 7 with Service Pack 1
·         Computer Type: PC compatible (no Macs)
·         Internet Browser: Internet Explorer 7 or Higher
·         Monitor Size: 17 inches or greater
·         Minimum RAM: 2 GB or higher
· Minimum Processor Speed: 1 GHZ (1000 MHz) or better on multi-core processors.
2 GHZ (2000 MHz) on single-core processors
·         Internet Connection: DSL or cable connection only (no modem access OR satellite connections)
·         Minimum Software Requirements: Updated Antivirus Software such as: Microsoft Security Essentials (Free), AVG (Free), Avast (Free), Trend Micro, Norton, McAfee, BitDefender, Kaspersky.
·        Video conferencing capabilities, i.e.: Skype, or Facetime for Interviews
·        5 GB free space for software installation
·        Download speed of 3072Kbps and upload speed of 512Kbps
·        1 Free USB Port

I may just throw some crap into a case and be done with it when all's said and done, just need to compare my parts and time vs. a provided solution.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 23, 2016, 12:47:44 PM
I take out the drives and secure erase them (assuming I don't keep them). But that's just me being paranoid.

Do you also run them over a giant rare earth magnet (an industrial one meant for hanging hundreds of pounds) or is that just me?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 23, 2016, 12:51:06 PM
More of a PC question but I'm not building it so I'll ask here.

Anyone have a good site for budget laptops? Wife may need one for a new job (Yeah they don't provide, don't get me started there.) and the requirements are so low that it's laughable.

Quote
·         Minimum OS Version: Windows 7 with Service Pack 1
·         Computer Type: PC compatible (no Macs)
·         Internet Browser: Internet Explorer 7 or Higher
·         Monitor Size: 17 inches or greater
·         Minimum RAM: 2 GB or higher
· Minimum Processor Speed: 1 GHZ (1000 MHz) or better on multi-core processors.
2 GHZ (2000 MHz) on single-core processors
·         Internet Connection: DSL or cable connection only (no modem access OR satellite connections)
·         Minimum Software Requirements: Updated Antivirus Software such as: Microsoft Security Essentials (Free), AVG (Free), Avast (Free), Trend Micro, Norton, McAfee, BitDefender, Kaspersky.
·        Video conferencing capabilities, i.e.: Skype, or Facetime for Interviews
·        5 GB free space for software installation
·        Download speed of 3072Kbps and upload speed of 512Kbps
·        1 Free USB Port

I may just throw some crap into a case and be done with it when all's said and done, just need to compare my parts and time vs. a provided solution.

Just look around your town for one of those crappy independent computer service places. They almost always have some used refurbs on sale for super cheap.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 23, 2016, 12:52:34 PM
I take out the drives and secure erase them (assuming I don't keep them). But that's just me being paranoid.
Do you also run them over a giant rare earth magnet (an industrial one meant for hanging hundreds of pounds) or is that just me?
Nope.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on August 25, 2016, 01:21:09 PM
I take out the drives and secure erase them (assuming I don't keep them). But that's just me being paranoid.

Do you also run them over a giant rare earth magnet (an industrial one meant for hanging hundreds of pounds) or is that just me?
I figure that if 7-pass random overwrite is good enough for the CIA, it's good enough for me. If I was *that* worried about what was on them, I'd drill them, then roast them on the barbecue.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on August 25, 2016, 03:33:24 PM
I still gut old hard drives for the fridge magnets. Good luck getting much data after that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 25, 2016, 07:57:21 PM
I do that, too. And One of our old server spindles I bent the platters into a 'sculpture' that sits on my desk.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on October 06, 2016, 04:46:47 PM
I bought this laptop (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834298944) last November, and put this Sandisk SSD (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820173012) into it. Yesterday morning it appears to have shat the bed; when I power it on, it tells me no bootable disk. I check the BIOS and it doesn't see the SSD at all; I pulled it out and hooked it up to my desktop and that doesn't see the SSD either. Any other steps you guys could think of to get this thing to work? Or failing that, any at-home recovery options for a drive that the PC fails to recognize? Any reason why an 11 month old SSD would die?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 06, 2016, 05:13:37 PM
SATA controller on the drive probably died. It can happen.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on October 06, 2016, 05:43:38 PM
Anything I can do to fix it or at least recover my data?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Reg on October 07, 2016, 05:15:37 AM
My Google Now cards keep disappearing. I've googled this problem and tried a couple of things. Turning off my location brings them back temporarily sometimes but they always disappear again. I've tried turning the cards off and deleting my preferences but that fails claiming there's a network error. There's nothing wrong with the network.

Does anyone have any ideas? This is affecting all of my devices and it's really annoying. I love my Google Now cards.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on October 07, 2016, 07:48:55 AM
Anything I can do to fix it or at least recover my data?

Did you use the same SATA cable in both?  If so there's always a small chance the cable failed and not the drive.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on October 07, 2016, 07:57:06 PM
Nope. Pulled a working cable from a storage drive to test it on the desktop.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on October 13, 2016, 01:53:42 PM
Is there a good PC benchmarking/stress software that's free? I'm having some freezing recent freezing issues, and I'd like to put my PC through the paces to see if I can replicate. Bonus if the program also stresses the graphic card so I can make sure temps are stable.

To be more specific about the issue, I've had unexpected reboot while playing MGSV, and a couple times I've had a program petty much infinitely load. Once I was I think firefox and the other was DotA2.  Can't even CAD out of it and kill the process.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 13, 2016, 02:52:48 PM
Furmark (http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/) is the best I've used for maxing GPU temp(s) and checking GPU stability. The nice thing about Furmark is you can visually see when the GPU is having issues (the fur hairs will freak out in strange ways). CPU Burn-In (http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/cpu_burn_in.html) is what I usually use for maxing out CPU temps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jimbo on November 21, 2016, 07:23:43 AM
Hey all, for anti-virus and anti-spyware do I need more? I buy ESET Nod32 and keep it upgraded all the time for my anti-virus program, then use Spybot S&D & SuperAntiSpyware for more protection (both are the free versions). So far that combo of those 3 have been very good for my Son's computer and mine. Is there anything else I should be looking at getting for protection? I used to get LifeLock for free with my oldest job, but haven't thought of getting it.

Oh still haven't erased my old laptop to donate to the Goodwill, I'm paranoid as I used it for school and my personal stuff, so it has passwords to everything still in it. I want to get rid of it, but the idea of someone getting my passwords and causing havoc would suck.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 22, 2016, 09:21:57 AM
Any wireless router recommendations? I have 50mbs service and consistently get 50mbps on anything wired. My existing router is a 5year old medialink and has been intermittently dropping connections on the wireless devices in house.

$100-$200 is ok. Thanks!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 22, 2016, 11:18:40 AM
I've been happy with my TP-Link AC1900 Archer C9 (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PDLRHFW/) paired with a TP-Link Archer AC1200 T4UH (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TQD235C).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Jimbo on November 22, 2016, 02:09:35 PM
I've had mine since 2014, from ASUS ASUS RT-AC87U Dual-band 4x4 AC2400 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16833320208), there newer one is even faster, AC5300 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16833320244) and more expensive. Though I have the PC's and the PS4 on wired internet from it, then use the wireless when I was using my laptop or the kids laptops or cell phones/kindles, seems it would let us do a ton of stuff (that and we have the fastest cable internet I could get for homeowners in my area). I'll probably get this for my travel computer when I go travel nursing ASUS AC3100 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16833320313).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 22, 2016, 04:57:41 PM
I've been happy with my TP-Link AC1900 Archer C9 (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PDLRHFW/) paired with a TP-Link Archer AC1200 T4UH (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TQD235C).
I've been happy with my Archer C7, but it is functioning strictly as an AP, if it were also acting as a router the fact it is single core might be an issue. The C9 is essentially the same, but with one more N band channel supported and a second core. It's a $50 upgrade between them ($85 vs $135), so if you (Hawkbit) don't think you'd be stressing it (not using the server functions, essentially) it might not be worth it.

If it were me doing it now, I would probably spring for it (it was close to a $100 gap when I was shopping).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 24, 2016, 08:16:03 AM
I've been happy with my TP-Link AC1900 Archer C9 (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PDLRHFW/) paired with a TP-Link Archer AC1200 T4UH (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TQD235C).

I ended up doing the C9 - thanks to everyone that gave input.

So this thing is pretty badass. I have to fault them for making such a short power cord and for not making the unit mountable. But the quality is really good. The only problems I have (not TP-Link's fault) is the PS4 which doesn't have a 5Ghz capable adapter and I'm getting very unreliable connection tests through it.

What's amazing is that I'm paying for 50mbs service and I've only been able to ever pull 50mbs when wired, but I'm pulling 60mbs with this new router. Awesome!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 24, 2016, 05:04:51 PM
The difference that router and adapter have made (along with a bonded cable modem I bought a couple years back) is ridiculous. I'm paying for a 10Mbps line but I'm getting 60Mbps  :drillf:

I put the old lady's stuff on the 2.4 radio  :hello_kitty:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 24, 2016, 05:30:16 PM
The difference that router and adapter have made (along with a bonded cable modem I bought a couple years back) is ridiculous. I'm paying for a 10Mbps line but I'm getting 60Mbps  :drillf:

I put the old lady's stuff on the 2.4 radio  :hello_kitty:
Would you feel dumb if I told you that Amazon cut the price $50 right after you bought yours?

I have my C7 configured with the "guest" SSID for B/G devices only (mostly the tablets) and most of the PC's are on the other 2.4 network (my laptop is the only one using the AC 5ghz band). The only time it matters is when I am making big transfers between the laptop and the NAS, nothing else needs more than the N's 150mbps.

They're all named the same except for the network type (BG, N, AC) appended. The BG network is duplicated on the cable modem, to fill in a blind spot on one side of the house. Keeping the legacy devices on their own SSID keeps them from slowing down the PC's.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 24, 2016, 06:42:10 PM

Would you feel dumb if I told you that Amazon cut the price $50 right after you bought yours?

Yes. DOH!

Sadly, Amazon doesn't do price protection, so I'm either out the $35 difference or I'm playing the "order a new one, send that one back for a refund" game.

Thanks for letting me know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on November 24, 2016, 09:08:02 PM

Would you feel dumb if I told you that Amazon cut the price $50 right after you bought yours?

Yes. DOH!

Sadly, Amazon doesn't do price protection, so I'm either out the $35 difference or I'm playing the "order a new one, send that one back for a refund" game.

Thanks for letting me know.

They kinda do. Get them on chat right now and explain that youd be happy to return a used item to buy a new one for less and you'll get your $50.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on November 25, 2016, 01:09:05 AM
Nope, they steadfastly refuse - five different people I've chatted or talked to.

It is so weird, they're going to pay for shipping it back on an open-box item, so they can pay to ship a new one out a lower price. I guess once you start up a rocketship company logistics become secondary. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: grebo on November 25, 2016, 09:27:21 AM
Question for you tech gurus.

Need to get 2 laptops for my 15yo daughters.  Main point of interest is probably gaming so I'd like something with decent GPU performance.  Budget is sub $400 each which puts me solidly in cheap territory.  Used to be that I'd have no problem sorting out the best bang for my buck, but now the range of available processors and GPU stuff is dizzying.  I have no clue and am having a lot of trouble getting a clue on what might be better than what, or if I should just not worry so much about the processor and get the best hdd/memory config I can.

Any help?  Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on November 25, 2016, 10:17:48 AM
Be careful what you define as "gaming". You can't get what most of us would call a "gaming" laptop in that price range, but if the focus is on older games and without maxxing out graphics settings, there may be options.

Here's an Acer laptop for $399.99 at NewEgg (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834315422) (NOT endorsing this model, just a reference point) that actually has an Nvidia 940MX, but that's anemic compared to anything you'd find on a desktop.

But for reference, the laptop I use regularly is a 4-yr-old Asus N53SV with an 540M (about 40% of the performance of the 940MX, according to userbenchmark.com). I've played Fallout 3 (with mods), Skyrim (with mods), GTA:SA, Guild Wars 2, and a lot of modded Minecraft on it without problems. Granted, all settings will be at medium, and framerates will be in the 20-40 range, but it's playable.

Processors haven't really improved in performance in 4+ years. It's all about the graphics. Without a discrete graphics card of some kind, gaming options will be limited, and there are very few low end laptops with discrete graphics.

EDIT: Some of the newer processors have vastly better integrated graphics, but as far as I can tell they're still all pretty sad compared to any discrete graphics. I'm skeptical of some of the benchmarks, though; the integrated graphics on my laptop (Intel HD 3000 in the I7-2670QM processor) supposedly benchmark at almost 50% of the discrete 540M, but none of the games I listed are remotely playable (<10 FPS) without using the discrete 540M.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: grebo on November 25, 2016, 11:13:15 AM
Thanks for that, good stuff.

Actually that laptop does look pretty good, and built in graphics hardware all seem all but nonexistent at this price point (other than the stuff that comes built in to the processor) Plus the 8gb/1tb make it more attractive too...

Honestly they're not really in to whatever the newest fps is, they just play Minecraft/Trove/online stuff without too much graphics requirements.. my 4yo desktop with whatever was mid-range 4 years ago for a graphics card is more than sufficient for what they put on it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 25, 2016, 11:56:47 AM
Look for laptops with the following Intel HD Graphics GPUs:

HD Graphics 5300/5500/5600 (Broadwell CPUs)
HD Graphics 515/520/530 (Skylake CPUs)

The Skylake integrated GPUs are better than the Broadwell ones despite their lower numbers. Basically you want Broadwell or Skylake GT2 tier GPU (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics) or better.

Here's the search on Newegg for just new items from Newegg (http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=Property&N=100006740%20601107792%20601107737%20601183266%20600551521%20600551516%20600563996%20600565854%20601190643%20600563992%204814&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=96) (excludes refurb and 3rd party sellers).

This Acer model has the 520 for $320: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834315670

If you prefer Dell this one has the 5500 for $399: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16834299304

Monoprice has an HP with the 5500 for $299: http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=18557

Edit: here are some benchmarks:

http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/three-generations-intel-hd-graphics-tested/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: grebo on November 25, 2016, 01:45:10 PM
Thanks for all that!  Helps a lot to know what to look for.  I'll probably go with one of those mentioned, and will decide today.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Severian on November 27, 2016, 06:39:50 PM
Back to routers for a moment, I discovered an impressive deal through Slickdeals for an ASUS TM-AC1900 ($129.95 at Amazon) which is rebranded and offered through the T-Mobile store for $109 -$10 -$40 = $59 w/ free overnight shipping. I just ordered one a few minutes ago.
Details: Slickdeals (https://slickdeals.net/f/9330575-asus-tm-ac1900-wireless-ac1900-dual-band-gigabit-router-59-free-shipping)
T-Mobile Store: Router (http://www.t-mobile.com/accessories/t-mobile-wi-fi-cellspot-router.html)
The shipping costs disappear once you get to the final checkout, and that includes the overnight option, which I took. The router has T-Mobile firmware which you can flash to ASUS or to options like Merlin or Tomato (see the Slickdeals page and comments) but it works fine out the box and I don't plan to go to the trouble.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on November 27, 2016, 06:50:49 PM
Back to routers for a moment, I discovered an impressive deal through Slickdeals for an ASUS TM-AC1900 ($129.95 at Amazon) which is rebranded and offered through the T-Mobile store for $109 -$10 -$40 = $59 w/ free overnight shipping. I just ordered one a few minutes ago.
Details: Slickdeals (https://slickdeals.net/f/9330575-asus-tm-ac1900-wireless-ac1900-dual-band-gigabit-router-59-free-shipping)
T-Mobile Store: Router (http://www.t-mobile.com/accessories/t-mobile-wi-fi-cellspot-router.html)
The shipping costs disappear once you get to the final checkout, and that includes the overnight option, which I took. The router has T-Mobile firmware which you can flash to ASUS or to options like Merlin or Tomato (see the Slickdeals page and comments) but it works fine out the box and I don't plan to go to the trouble.

If it didn't come with recently updated firmware, or you didn't flash it yourself, it's probably already compromised due to multiple vulnerabilities. (http://baesystemsai.blogspot.com/2016/04/multiple-vulnerabilities-affecting.html)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Severian on November 27, 2016, 08:29:04 PM
Thanks for that. After spending some time looking into it, even though the router will auto-update to the latest T-Mobile firmware, that's still over five months old and lagging behind (https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/5bhvvz/tmobile_ac1900_route_ever_going_to_get_a_firmware/d9olx9d/). Looks like I'll be sweating over the tricky flash to one of the alternatives.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on November 28, 2016, 08:15:35 PM
Dropped my ipad on the way into the hotel today and shattered the screen. Of course. Anyone have experience replacing the screens and what the success rate is? The kit was only $20 so I'm not concerned about cost, just tips and anecodtes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 28, 2016, 08:29:20 PM
Find the teardown for your model on iFixit (https://www.ifixit.com/) and you'll understand what it'll take to take it apart.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 29, 2016, 08:14:31 AM
Initial reading: "I dropped my load on the way into the hotel today..."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 20, 2016, 11:25:45 AM
How do I get started as a pseudo-noob on networking security? Not looking to change careers or anything from being a web dev, but looking to get back to basics on the hardware/networking security side of things. Any books or resources, keeping it on the newb-intermediate side, please?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 20, 2016, 02:45:39 PM
Look into comptia prep books for Security+. It's an easy test and the books cover the basics of network security.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: vos on December 21, 2016, 09:32:23 AM
https://www.cybrary.it/ is an excellent free resource to get you started


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 21, 2016, 08:42:34 PM
Thanks, both - I should have remembered the Security+, and that second post link is amazingly helpful. Much appreciated.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 22, 2016, 09:05:13 AM
Security+ involves a lot of WiFi and memorizing numbers.  Just saying.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 22, 2016, 09:54:26 AM
Security+ involves a lot of WiFi and memorizing numbers.  Just saying.
I did the last version, it was probably a bit lighter on the wifi stuff.

Tons of memorization, though. I wrote out charts that I was reviewing in the parking lot before the test. Not that I needed it since I got something like an 850 and I don't work with 80% of what was on the test.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on December 29, 2016, 10:25:05 PM
Is the Apple TV a good streaming player? I actually need one more streaming device, and they're offering a Gen 4 free with 3 months paid up front on Directv Now ($105).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on December 29, 2016, 10:54:15 PM
Is the Apple TV a good streaming player? I actually need one more streaming device, and they're offering a Gen 4 free with 3 months paid up front on Directv Now ($105).

I like mine. It obviously doesn't do Prime video, but everything else it does is pretty good. Netflix interface is pretty decent, so is HBONow.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on December 29, 2016, 11:16:00 PM
Do you use it for Plex? Does anyone here use one for Plex?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 05, 2017, 02:11:09 AM
Bought a rather nice GTX 1060 6Gb only to find that while it throws around games like a wrestler on crack, it also disables the RealTek onboard sound.

So everything looks great, but I can't hear it being great.

All the 'usual' fixes of updating drivers (card, sound and mobo) have come to naught.  Disabling the Graphic Audio doesn't do shit either.

I'm quite fucked off, just in case any Trippy has any bright ideas...



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 05, 2017, 09:17:44 AM
Did you check your sound settings to see if it has switched to outputting to HDMI (i.e. out your video cable) instead of your motherboard audio output jacks?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 05, 2017, 10:14:37 AM
I did indeed, but the usual options (speakers) are claiming that they are not plugged in.  Which is a common manifestation of this problem and also utter bollocks. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 05, 2017, 10:50:40 AM
Did you check your BIOS for any audio settings? I.e. did it disable your Realtek audio in your BIOS when you installed the video card?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 05, 2017, 11:25:20 AM
Checked and no.  Updated the bios also, no joy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 05, 2017, 03:36:52 PM
Did you try deleting (not just disabling) the NVIDIA audio drivers?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 05, 2017, 04:31:41 PM
Weird, I just had to fix a computer with the opposite problem: It refused to output audio through the HDMI via the video card sound chipset. Had to uninstall the inboard audio and the video card drivers completely, then install the reference drivers for both (not the ones from the card/mobo manufacturers, but the ones straight from RealTek and NVidia).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: JRave on January 05, 2017, 08:33:58 PM
This has been an on and off issue with Nvidia and Realtek for 5+ years now.  I had it happen to me once, but I can't recall how I fixed it.  I do know I don't use HDMI currently, so that might be how it fixed itself.  I also have nvidia audio disabled in the device manager.

I can make one minor suggestion to test via bios.  Go into the Bios and disable onboard sound and then enable it.  Reboot and see if that fixed things.  Apparently it is common for onboard sound to get disabled via bios, however the way nvidia's driver/install does things doesn't always display properly in the different types of bios.

Oh and make sure the onboard sound in bios is not set to "auto" if your bios has that option.  That can disable onboard sound when pci-e graphics is enabled in bios.  Really weird interactions with things, and it always seems to point back to Nvidia's drivers doing something you would not assume they are doing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 10, 2017, 11:53:12 AM
More a warning than anything else ;  don't ever use the @Bios updater.  It fucks things.

Be Smart.  Boot into Bios and use USB rather than a shortcut.  Shortcuts suck balls.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kail on January 14, 2017, 12:57:28 AM
Been having some really weird issues with my wireless internet for a few weeks now, wondering if I need a new modem or what.

The thing works fine when I switch the computer on, then after a while it tells me there's no available connections detected and I'm dumped in to offline mode.  I can switch off my wi-fi and switch it back on and it works again, but typically goes offline again after 10 min or so.  When it's online, the signal strength never looks bad, I'm only about 15 feet from the router.  It just jumps straight from "good" to "none" and stays there, sometimes for a few seconds, sometimes for a few hours.

Resetting the router doesn't seem to do anything helpful, and I haven't noticed this happening with my phone even when it's right next to the computer, so I suspect the issue is with something in the computer itself (meaning, my problem) rather than a problem with something somewhere farther down the line (meaning, the cable company's problem).  Other people have complained about the wireless being flaky, though, so I don't know how much is just them complaining and how much is an indicator that it IS something to call the cable company about.  People using computers wired in to the network claim it works fine for them, so it looks like if there is an issue, it looks like a wireless only thing.

Any advice?  Something obvious I'm missing?  Some driver to update?  A windows diagnostic tool that returns a result other than "shrug"?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2017, 09:31:13 AM
Need to know your PC's wireless adapter, your phone model and your wireless router model. Also is your router broacasting multiple SSIDs? It's possible one of the antennas on the wireless router or your wireless adapter is going bad. If your phone uses a different antenna that may explain why it's not losing its connection.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on January 14, 2017, 02:46:55 PM
Any advice?  Something obvious I'm missing?  Some driver to update?  A windows diagnostic tool that returns a result other than "shrug"?

If you're using Windows 10, it has incredibly flaky wireless support. Between bad default drivers and buggy "helper" software (WiFi Sense), my partner was about ready to run a 100' cable through the house so she could actually use the Internet. Eventually, a combination of scrubbing and reinstalling drivers, disabling WiFi Sense, and tweaking every power-saving feature to try to keep Windows 10 from powering down the wifi adapter fixed it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on January 15, 2017, 12:02:07 AM
Our legacy Dropbox Public folders are going away later this year. I can't find any other way to get image links that work on the forums inline. Do any of the Dropbox alternatives out there do this better? Is OwnCloud any good, assuming I have access to a VPS and lots of free time? I don't strictly need anything fancier than an FTP bucket on a static hosting service, but that requires a lot more clicks per image than Dropbox currently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 15, 2017, 02:12:42 PM
Yea I'm pretty upset about this Dropbox change. :(


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 15, 2017, 02:30:48 PM
Huh.

For here I would just switch to imgur.com. OwnCloud may work depending on the size of your VPS but it's work to setup.

Edit: the only trick now with imgur.com is you need to right-click or otherwise get the real URL of your upload image to paste that into here cause they don't display that now after you upload the image(s).

E.g. here's an Imgur image from the Warframe subreddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/Warframe/comments/5o3x8g/the_place_snipers_are_made_for/).

http://imgur.com/IuJJrl4

If you go to the above URL and right-click on the image and copy the image URL you get:

http://i.imgur.com/IuJJrl4.jpg

and that's what you would use here.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on January 15, 2017, 02:48:27 PM
Can we be sure to not end up hotlinking imgur's malware?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 15, 2017, 03:02:15 PM
The .jpg link is just the JPEG file -- not an Imgur HTML page which may or may not have any popups or ad iframes.

Of course you still have to risk using Imgur to upload the file and get the image link in the first place.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Kail on January 16, 2017, 06:31:21 PM
Need to know your PC's wireless adapter, your phone model and your wireless router model. Also is your router broacasting multiple SSIDs? It's possible one of the antennas on the wireless router or your wireless adapter is going bad. If your phone uses a different antenna that may explain why it's not losing its connection.

The router is broadcasting two SSIDs, one normal one and one 5G one that the mobiles tap in to.  I hadn't realized that they were separate physical systems.  The phone seems to connect OK to either one, but the PC can't see the 5G one.  Not sure if the phone is having trouble on the non-5G network or not, it seems to switch back and forth whenever it loses signal.

The wireless router I'm not sure about, it's either an Arris TM602G/115 or a Morotola SBG6782-HH.  I suspect the Motorola because that's the one with the network SSIDs written on it.  This stuff is pretty much in my "someone else's problem" box so if I can't get this sorted out I might break down and just call a tech.

PC Wireless looks like a Broadcom BCM43142, the phone is a SM-N900W8 (Samsung Galaxy Note 3).

Updating the driver software again as I post this.  If that doesn't work, I'll try disabling WiFi Sense, and then a call to tech support if there's still issues.  Thanks for the advice!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on January 16, 2017, 08:04:18 PM
The wireless router I'm not sure about, it's either an Arris TM602G/115 or a Morotola SBG6782-HH.  I suspect the Motorola because that's the one with the network SSIDs written on it.  This stuff is pretty much in my "someone else's problem" box so if I can't get this sorted out I might break down and just call a tech.

Many Arris cable modems released since 2008 (!!!) have remote-exploit vulnerabilities baked into them unless you updated the firmware after mid-2016.





Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 16, 2017, 10:26:59 PM
A pox on Dropbox. We should all go out of our way to badmouth them for this one.

It was a good run and they were the best no-bullshit image host. My blog is about to be shut down, since the last 5 years of images is about to go bye bye. Guess how happy I am about that? I guess it's finally time to host up, since it's starting to get all businessy lately.

Do they really think this is going to get people to buy in somehow? I hope it's worth the massive amount of ill will they're bringing on themselves.

Because fuuuuuck dropbox. It's the new Flikr!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bungee on January 17, 2017, 06:29:41 AM
A pox on Dropbox. We should all go out of our way to badmouth them for this one.

No shit, my GFs office uses Dropbox for basically all their documents (I know...) and everything is gone now. No event logs, nothing. Folders just gone. And you of course have to file a ticket and wait for at least 3 workdays to get an answer...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 17, 2017, 08:16:20 AM
What's this? Some kind of file age restriction for free accounts?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 17, 2017, 09:51:53 AM
Quote
We’re always looking to improve the Dropbox sharing experience. The Public folder was the first sharing method we introduced, and since then, we’ve built even better ways for you to share securely and work together with your team.

As a result, we’ll soon be ending support for the Public folder. Dropbox Basic users will be able to use the Public folder until March 15, 2017. After that date the files in your Public folder will become private, and links to these files will be deactivated. Your files will remain safe in Dropbox.

If you’d like to keep sharing files in your Public folder, you can create new shared links. Just make sure to send the new URLs to your collaborators.

In addition to shared links, we have a number of sharing options designed to make collaboration easier and give you more control. To learn more, visit our Help Center.

The Dropbox team
My read is that they want any link to go to their page, rather than just be an image host. They've been moving toward being a collaborative platform for a while now. Which is fine, but taking a dump on your early supporters kinda sucks. Flikr did exactly the same thing when Yahoo bought them out, there was a way to actually link to the naked image iirc, but it was a pita and not worth it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 17, 2017, 10:32:57 AM
Flickr.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 17, 2017, 10:44:14 AM
A pox on Dropbox. We should all go out of our way to badmouth them for this one.

No shit, my GFs office uses Dropbox for basically all their documents (I know...) and everything is gone now. No event logs, nothing. Folders just gone. And you of course have to file a ticket and wait for at least 3 workdays to get an answer...

That sounds completely different than what's being discussed. I'm surprised nobody had a local backup either. My office uses Dropbox as well and if we wiped it accidentally or Dropbox did one of us traveling shlubs would have a backup to restore even if the web restore had somehow been wiped. 

Sounds more like someone was acting maliciously at her company.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on January 17, 2017, 11:56:45 PM
For simple image hosting is there anything wrong with Imgur? I stopped using dropbox for that kind of thing ages ago because their links regularly fucked up, it got harder and harder to direct link to files and Imgur is quick and easy.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 18, 2017, 06:42:30 AM
I like Dropbox's folder layout and UI in general. It's really easy to do the simple things I need to do and keep everything organized.

I don't know why you'd find it hard to direct link to dropbox images, it's literally a button to pop up the url.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Bungee on January 20, 2017, 12:52:50 PM
No shit, my GFs office uses Dropbox for basically all their documents (I know...) and everything is gone now. No event logs, nothing. Folders just gone. And you of course have to file a ticket and wait for at least 3 workdays to get an answer...
*snip*
Sounds more like someone was acting maliciously at her company.

Nah, it's a lot more... incompetence than maliciousness. It's a non-profit where nobody knows how "any of this" works. Even their IT guy made me want to punch him when I heard what "actions" he took.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 25, 2017, 06:23:58 PM
Since I built my new rig it doesn't want to find the printer hooked up to the router.   I try to search for it in settings and it just won't come up. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on January 25, 2017, 06:39:28 PM
Download the drivers for it manually?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 25, 2017, 07:02:34 PM
Meh, figured it out. Needed to tell it the IP address.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on January 26, 2017, 11:20:07 AM
I have a new job. I am now an IP Manager, meaning I'm overseeing development of software addins for my company. (Yay managers who can't code.)

I have a need of a helpfile-writing software now. I nabbed a copy of HelpNDoc which my the VP over me used years ago and he's wondering if there's a freeware/ cheaper/ different thing out there now. Any suggestions from you code monkeys?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on January 26, 2017, 12:31:02 PM
I used RoboHelp for about 3 years in the 90s  :ye_gods:

It was simple and good back then, but not cheap.  No idea if that has changed in the last ... [oh, christ!] 20 years.

Edit: Looks like it got gobbled up by Adobe along the way.  So now I know it's not cheap.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on February 04, 2017, 09:10:59 AM
Made a post about NASes like ten pages back. Finally ended up getting a WD PR4100 16TB as it has acceleration and can run a Plex server with multiple streams.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Phildo on February 14, 2017, 07:33:02 AM
Does anyone have experience administering an office with multiple Macs?  It's been a nightmare juggling Apple IDs lately and I haven't been able to find a solution other than having an individual one for each system.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on February 14, 2017, 07:43:26 AM
That's how we did it as it was the easiest way. I'm sure surly or samwise or sky might have different opinions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 14, 2017, 08:38:17 AM
Not sure why you need individual Apple IDs? I use one to install core software for people.

We just use local users, but their server software is cheap and easy to set up network users.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 16, 2017, 01:15:43 PM
Hack stuff moved here:

http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=25552.0


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on February 16, 2017, 02:06:01 PM
Not sure why you need individual Apple IDs? I use one to install core software for people.

We just use local users, but their server software is cheap and easy to set up network users.

We didn't use local users, and they had to be able to work through the Windows network. I had it explained to me as, "it's the only way to get them hooked into the windows environment." I don't know that it was the case but since I wasn't the netadmin I didn't see the need to question it.

Given you're talking about running Apple server software for network users, I suppose they were correct.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 04, 2017, 07:46:56 AM
For those of you who want to know about what wi-fi routers to buy etc, this article is great at explaining how wi-fi works and what the numbers you see on devices don't mean.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/03/802-eleventy-what-a-deep-dive-into-why-wi-fi-kind-of-sucks/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on March 04, 2017, 02:07:15 PM
I have always used the rule of thumb that total bandwidth on wifi is half of whatever the lowest connection rate on the network was, divided between all systems on the network. My fastest connection is 650mbps (ac for the laptop), and 40MB/second is the fastest I have ever seen from it in actual transfers (reading from the NAS onto the laptops SSD, going the other way I am limited to 20MB/sec writes for the cheap WD Green drives). I have separate networks for B/G, N, and AC, and get the results I expect for the "50% of nominal" rule of thumb.

Main thing seems to be having different Tx/Rx sets on the router for each network (edit: And different networks for each type), so the slow systems don't bottleneck the fast ones.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 15, 2017, 12:59:01 PM
So now that Dropbox has now fully fucked my 5-yr old blog by disabling links to all the pics on it....

What are people using for Dropbox replacements for image hosting? I don't want to do imgur or whatever, I like the privacy and control of Dropbox, the pseudo-ftp server feel of it. Time to bite the bullet and get my own hosting or is there another good option out there?

Also, fuck Dropbox right in their shitty whimholes. "Oh, we decided you don't work this way, so now you can't." I know they gave a few months lead-in that it was coming, but I'm not going to go back and edit 5 years worth of sometimes daily art posts. Not to mention several forums I've linked images to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 16, 2017, 08:47:18 AM
1. I don't know of a decent replacement for Dropbox Public folder, but then I haven't looked very hard.  I'd like to find one.

2. Yes, fuck Dropbox.  I only keep things in there now because: a) free, b) lazy

2.a Might start putting things in my IBM Box account (unlimited storage) but the problem is that I don't know how long I'll be working here.
2.b There should exist a pre-made front end for a S3 static HTML site which enumerates all the objects... unless that isn't "static".  I'm not a web programmer.

3. Don't edit, use sed or one of the hipster editors like Atom (atom.io).  Atom will do search+replace on all files in a dir tree.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 16, 2017, 09:32:34 AM
Bit the bullet and bought some hosting. I think I'll try to move my entire site (including broken image links) over, just to have the historical text intact.

Couldn't bring myself to consider any solutions that were subject to whim again. Working with a lot of Google products has made my tolerance for changing fundamental shit 'just cuz' entirely nonexistent.

I don't know that fancy talk, I'm just a potato farmer. Sounds like what I want, but eh.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2017, 09:59:31 AM
Google cancels shit all the time. They aren't a good example to use in this situation.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on March 16, 2017, 10:28:39 AM
Google cancels shit all the time. They aren't a good example to use in this situation.

Think they were his *bad* example, because they are always breaking their shit.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 16, 2017, 11:53:50 AM
Yep.

So many random changes that break things for us that any time someone else pulls it...

(http://i.imgur.com/4MjblnB.gif)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 16, 2017, 12:33:28 PM
Why do I think Adaptive geometry/ model degredation is a thing in game engines? Have I made that up in my head?

i.e. load fewer polys the farther from the camera you are.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2017, 12:40:58 PM
Nope it's been a thing for a while now. I still remember there was an article in a gaming magazine like CGW talking about that technology being used in the original concept of TF2 (a military shooter, not the cartoony thing it became).

http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/1999/cn031799.htm


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on March 16, 2017, 12:42:09 PM
I want to say its usually called LoD or Level of Detail.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on March 16, 2017, 01:19:58 PM
Poly-count LOD has been in game engines forever. It was already old hat in the graphics research world 25 years ago, and I remember games for the Voodoo2 that had it. If done poorly, it's really obvious especially in terrain--distant mountains will change shape as you get closer, trees (and people!) can lose limbs, cars become boxes, etc.

The ROAM algorithm (for real-time optimally adapting meshes) (http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=267028) (ACM digital library citation) was first published in 1997. A decade later, there were already papers about use of modified ROAM in game engines (https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijcgt/2008/753584/). I worked on a large-scale visual simulation systems before (1993+) then that had adaptive model degradation for distant models and terrain, but it was computed statically because of customer requirements on model fidelity.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on March 16, 2017, 01:24:45 PM
As you can see in my link above Intel's technology was from 1999.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 16, 2017, 01:43:43 PM
And yet mountains still change shape as you approach in 2017.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on March 16, 2017, 01:44:30 PM
Oh the dropbox public folder is finally gone? Yeah, I don't know how to use dropbox now


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 16, 2017, 04:01:20 PM
Nope it's been a thing for a while now. I still remember there was an article in a gaming magazine like CGW talking about that technology being used in the original concept of TF2 (a military shooter, not the cartoony thing it became).

http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/1999/cn031799.htm


Yeah that's what I thought. So clearly the people in my software dev group using Unity, Unreal and Stingray for AR/ VR have no idea how the fuck to utilize this.  The complaint with the hololens on a call today was they had to manually downgrade everything in maya to make some models work and not stutter.

Which meant loss of fidelity for the overall project meaning AR "wasn't yet viable" for things like demoing how something comes apart if you're loooing at a complex object or machine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 16, 2017, 07:53:15 PM
Oh the dropbox public folder is finally gone? Yeah, I don't know how to use dropbox now
My fiancee was using it the way they wanted, with the app installed and a sync folder on her computer and I kinda boggled at that. Have to get her properly using the synology.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on March 22, 2017, 07:57:18 AM
Oh the dropbox public folder is finally gone? Yeah, I don't know how to use dropbox now
My fiancee was using it the way they wanted, with the app installed and a sync folder on her computer and I kinda boggled at that. Have to get her properly using the synology.

That's how I've always used dropbox. How were you guys using it and what did they get rid of?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 22, 2017, 08:00:04 AM
They used to have a Public folder that let you embed images on forums. So if any of the images in my older posts have disappeared, it's because they removed that feature.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Teleku on March 24, 2017, 03:12:58 AM
Heh.  The State Department blocks everything about dropbox on our network (even going to their website).  So all I saw was a series of X's when ever you assholes linked pictures from your dropbox to here while browsing at work.  I welcome this change!   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 24, 2017, 05:43:31 AM
They used to have a Public folder that let you embed images on forums. So if any of the images in my older posts have disappeared, it's because they removed that feature.

Yeah, no more free image hosting. We can give a link but it requires a click-through to their cookie-laden ad-frame viewer.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on March 24, 2017, 05:46:23 AM
You can't really blame them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 24, 2017, 05:57:23 AM
Not really, no. Any gripes are purely selfish on my part and I realize that. If I want to host images I can use a paid service, it's just *effort* vs "eh I'm already using this site for files..."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 24, 2017, 09:40:59 AM
Someone explain what the problem is with Imgur?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 24, 2017, 09:49:02 AM
It's shit?  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 25, 2017, 11:51:49 AM
Not really, no. Any gripes are purely selfish on my part and I realize that. If I want to host images I can use a paid service, it's just *effort* vs "eh I'm already using this site for files..."
Yep, I completely understand why they did it. And bitching about losing 6 years of free hosting is  :why_so_serious: Especially as they gave us plenty of notification it was happening...

I've only use imgur for temporary stuff, don't know how their ui is for more robust image hosting options.

I went with my own hosting because then I can just set it up with my own url and if I change hosts it won't break everything.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 28, 2017, 05:03:23 AM
Imgur seems fine for me for simple stuff, if you create an account you can have as many separate albums as you want, you can make your images private, upload is fast and simple, you can link directly to images, etc. The only time it shits the bed a bit is when Reddit USA all come online at once in the evening and it gets a bit overloaded.

Unrelated, but can anyone recommend a lightweight & free program for drawing simple things like flowcharts etc.? Something like PowePoint or Visio but much, much simpler. I want boxes, lines, text, maybe a snappable grid, not much more. It needs to run on a low end windows PC (Surface Pro 3). I tried LibreOffice but it was slow as fuck. It's only got 4Gb of RAM and Windows 10 eats half of that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 28, 2017, 05:36:53 AM
I recently found Pencil for UI mock-ups, it's got a flowchart piece to it. It's pretty simple and easy to use as well as free. My biggest complaint is that it doesn't seem to keep the layers/ draw order correct when I open old files.

http://pencil.evolus.vn/

Fake Edit: Just went to the site and there's a new version. I had 2.x which was where I had the problem. No idea what 3.0 is like

Real edit: Also, you could try SnagIt by Techsmith. It's meant to be a screenshot markup program, but you could use it for flowcharts if so desired. Pencil would be my first choice, though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 28, 2017, 06:13:37 AM
Pencil seems perfect and runs like a dream, thank you!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 28, 2017, 09:48:46 AM
Have you saved, closed and then reopened your file yet? That's where all the surprises happened.  I opened one of my 2.x files and it's fucked, but I haven't corrected it to see if 3.0 fixed things.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on March 28, 2017, 10:54:39 AM
I have, and even re-opened on a different machine, and all is well. It really is exactly what I was looking for :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on March 29, 2017, 05:58:04 AM
Awesome! Glad to help!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on April 20, 2017, 04:51:55 AM
Any decent free pdf editors? I want to add pages, re-jig order, etc.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on April 20, 2017, 02:37:11 PM
Free? haha! CutePDF works ok, its cheap but not amazing. I use it to reorder and splice PDFs together.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on April 21, 2017, 06:49:09 PM
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/feature/software/how-edit-pdf-for-free-3653069/

I've tried PDFpro and PDFx-change at cheap companies before and they both had problems. Still, free is free.

The comment in that page seems doable, though. I just tried it and wasn't able to insert pages but could edit a text/ vector PDF:

Quote
For me, this also worked well:

1. Upload pdf in google drive.

2. Right click the pdf in google drive & open with google docs.(This will create another copy of the pdf in google-doc format)

3. Edit the file in google docs & then download as pdf

If you need to do anything like marking-up those PDFs you can not beat Bluebeam. It's fucking amazing. Sure, it was designed for the AEC industry but it's so easy to use and has a ton of features. Price is probably steeper than you'd like at $350, but the maintenance is cheaper than Adobe at $99 per year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 21, 2017, 08:36:16 PM
The last couple of posts remind me that I need to put in my $9 yearly "Home Use Program" order in at the U for Creative Cloud.  :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on May 03, 2017, 02:17:06 PM
Any recommendations for non-Adobe photo editing tools? I dislike their pricing schemes and wonder if other options like Affinity are almost as good.

Forgot to qualify: I'm not a pro, I am starting to get back into hobby photography and need a way to manage and minor edit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 03, 2017, 03:38:32 PM
The last couple of posts remind me that I need to put in my $9 yearly "Home Use Program" order in at the U for Creative Cloud.  :grin:
hate you so much


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 06, 2017, 11:42:31 AM
So quick question: I've got u-verse, and I can't really move the wireless router from it's current position. I've got a fairly small house (under 1500 sq ft) but there's a lot of dead spots, mostly because the router is at one corner of the house -- so two of the other corners get shit signal strength.

So I'm looking at repeaters and found those, some things called mesh extenders, etc. No idea what I really need here, never had to bother with it.

Basically looking for a solution that'll play well with U-verse so I don't have to figure out whatever dumb-ass system they have and increase signal strength to the back half of the house without, well, much effort on my part.

As close to plug and play as possible is ideal. I just want to plug them into a wall in one or two places and get more even signal strength, and not spend six hours cussing out U-verse and dealing with technical support and digging through forums trying to find answers on obscure settings.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 06, 2017, 11:42:27 PM
The mesh shit is pricey but i believe the best one is still the Netgear Orbi.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: apocrypha on May 07, 2017, 03:37:48 AM
Standard wifi repeaters create a new wifi network for each repeater and you just connect to whichever one in the room you're in has the best signal. For instance in my house our main wifi network is called Nebulous and we have two extenders that create Nebulous_EXT1 and Nebulous_EXT2, which both connect to the same network but are actually separate wifi networks.

A mesh system extends the same network throughout it's coverage, so we'd just have Nebulous everywhere in the house. Mesh is still very expensive since it's really aimed at businesses, but it's getting cheaper all the time.

If you can cope with separate networks then the standard extenders work fine and are a lot cheaper, and most devices these days are smart enough to just automatically connect to the best signal. I'd love to have mesh because some things have to be manually told which network to connect to when you move from room to room which is a pain, but it's not cheap enough for me yet.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on May 07, 2017, 07:13:45 AM
Question for all you networking types out there:

I am trying to track down an issue that is driving me up the wall with my home network setup.

I rent from someone who lets me use their home internet system.  My current setup is basically my PC and other devices hook into my Netgear router, which then hooks into their home router (unsure of model, but I can prob get the info pretty easy), which has the direct Network feed.
My issue is that for some reason I have been unable to isolate, I am getting annoying connection issues with what may be DNS lookups or something similar.  For example, when I load a website, there is about a 50% chance that half the images on the page simply do not load at all, or that the page itself just fails to load.  I can re-fresh the page a few times and suddenly everything loads fine.

As far as i can tell all my drivers and firmware are 100% up to date on my end, so I am wondering if there is just some kind of bad handshaking going on between my router and theirs.

If anyone has any suggestions as to things i could try, that would be great.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 07, 2017, 09:18:18 AM
Double-NAT is always a recipe for weird shit to happen. Is there any way you can test without your router in the mix?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 07, 2017, 09:28:10 AM
Thanks. I think mesh is what I want then -- I'd prefer not to have one network piggybacking off another, as the "Why can't I connect to X" followed by futzing with ports is already annoying enough. (Although, thankfully, a lot less common than it used to be). Doing it through two routers seems nightmarish.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 07, 2017, 10:57:25 AM
Question for all you networking types out there:

I am trying to track down an issue that is driving me up the wall with my home network setup.

I rent from someone who lets me use their home internet system.  My current setup is basically my PC and other devices hook into my Netgear router, which then hooks into their home router (unsure of model, but I can prob get the info pretty easy), which has the direct Network feed.
My issue is that for some reason I have been unable to isolate, I am getting annoying connection issues with what may be DNS lookups or something similar.  For example, when I load a website, there is about a 50% chance that half the images on the page simply do not load at all, or that the page itself just fails to load.  I can re-fresh the page a few times and suddenly everything loads fine.

As far as i can tell all my drivers and firmware are 100% up to date on my end, so I am wondering if there is just some kind of bad handshaking going on between my router and theirs.

If anyone has any suggestions as to things i could try, that would be great.
Enable the network debug panel in your browser (e.g. Network tab in Developer Tools in Chrome) and watch what happens when you visit/reload a page. If you see "stalls" on individual URLs do an nslookup using a shell on that host name to see if there's a delay in DNS lookup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 08, 2017, 09:51:30 AM
I am trying to track down an issue that is driving me up the wall with my home network setup.

I rent from someone who lets me use their home internet system...I am wondering if there is just some kind of bad handshaking going on between my router and theirs.
Any way you can wire into their modem directly and run a parallel router and cut out the issues trying to run a serial setup?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on May 08, 2017, 01:11:02 PM
I am trying to track down an issue that is driving me up the wall with my home network setup.

I rent from someone who lets me use their home internet system...I am wondering if there is just some kind of bad handshaking going on between my router and theirs.
Any way you can wire into their modem directly and run a parallel router and cut out the issues trying to run a serial setup?
Should be possible to set up the router as just an AP, without the double NAT, still have your own wifi SSID but use the house system for NAT/DHCP/DNS. That's how mine is set up here.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 08, 2017, 03:13:50 PM
Yeah you can set your router to "bridge" mode.

However double-NATing / adding an extra router in the chain will not by itself cause connection "hangs". Most people probably don't realize that today's wireless cable "modems" are actually routers and not strictly modems, so if you hook up your own router to one you are already double-NATing unless you explicitly set one of the routers to bridge mode.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 09, 2017, 12:15:50 PM
Assuming that Uverse is Uverse, since I can't even see the wireless network that my receivers use, and you have to do that "press button and run to the other room without dying" thing, I'm terribly suspicious that I can't use an off-the-shelf extender.

I await the full story.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on May 09, 2017, 12:19:14 PM
You can get a utility to detect "hidden" SSIDs if you really want to know what your receivers are connecting to.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 09, 2017, 01:24:56 PM
They are connecting to a wifi endpoint that connects to the gateway via ethernet, but the mystery is if I can extend that wifi using off-the-shelf equipment.

Actually that was only a question since I read Morat's post.  The wifi works well enough, especially compared to coax.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 12, 2017, 09:59:27 PM
Well, my wife's laptop has shit itself in the most godawful way.

To sum up:

1. I foolishly attempted a Windows update. It...did not work. (Got stuck downloading updates). Rebooted. Couldn't even START downloading updates.
2. Attempted to reset the windows update service, per the MSN "Our Windows Update Shit fucks up all the time and gets stuck".
3. Explorer crashes right after I restart the services.
4. On reboot, everything normal -- log into profile -- black screen with cursor. FUCK.
5. Fail to get into safe mode.
6. Get into OS recovery, attempt to reset OS.
7. Hangs at 3% for hours.
8. Gets rebooted. Now can't get into OS recovery (bootinit.exe exception).
9. Boots back to main. Starts scanning/repairing HD. Stuck at 63%. FUCK.

I'm about 95% sure the hard drive is fucked. Nothing else should be able to fuck up the OS recovery shit. A lovely growing hard drive failure, however, could.

Under warranty, but fuckit...so much data lost.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Torinak on May 12, 2017, 10:14:09 PM
My partner had a laptop hard drive fail with similar symptoms. It turned out that only a small number of sectors were bad, but they were in the critical places for the Windows 10 kernel and bootstrap loading files. It looked like Windows thought the corrupted files were the "right" ones so it'd helpfully clobber whatever we replaced the usable ones with (manually or through Windows Update) and re-corrupt the drive until it wouldn't boot at all. We moved the drive to another computer and were able to get 99%+ of the data off of it. So, all may not be lost.

You may have to buy a (cheap) drive chassis depending on the connection used by the laptop's drive and what you have available on other systems. We were fortunate in that we had a spare SATA to USB cable that worked just fine for data and power.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 12, 2017, 10:22:55 PM
My partner had a laptop hard drive fail with similar symptoms. It turned out that only a small number of sectors were bad, but they were in the critical places for the Windows 10 kernel and bootstrap loading files. It looked like Windows thought the corrupted files were the "right" ones so it'd helpfully clobber whatever we replaced the usable ones with (manually or through Windows Update) and re-corrupt the drive until it wouldn't boot at all. We moved the drive to another computer and were able to get 99%+ of the data off of it. So, all may not be lost.

You may have to buy a (cheap) drive chassis depending on the connection used by the laptop's drive and what you have available on other systems. We were fortunate in that we had a spare SATA to USB cable that worked just fine for data and power.
I have one of those, but I'm honestly not sure how the hell to get the drive out of this thing. It's a pretty new laptop. I couldn't even locate the battery. (Admittedly, I just turned it over and said "Where's the battery" and then said "Fuck it, it doesn't matter" and went about my day".

As it's under warranty, it's pretty much shipping it to them for a new one and writing off the data. There isn't much, thankfully --  she's had it less than a year and hasn't really done much with it.

If it's still stuck at 63% in the morning, I'll use the boot menu's diagnostics to check the drive. It's a three hour process for what I thought was a low-likelihood event. Now I'm thinking....pretty likely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 12, 2017, 10:32:37 PM
leave it plugged in, let it run that shit until it finishes.

My mom's computer spent like 9 hours running the chkdsk verification/auto-repair shit during a set of updates on windows 10 and now it works fine.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 12, 2017, 10:40:49 PM
leave it plugged in, let it run that shit until it finishes.

My mom's computer spent like 9 hours running the chkdsk verification/auto-repair shit during a set of updates on windows 10 and now it works fine.
Yeah, it finally powered through that and is now offering me options. I'm mulling between rolling back to a restore point or resetting the OS.

Edited to add: Dell is a fucking dick. They've got their own damn OS restore shit in there that makes finding safe mode a nightmare of random guessing. And I can't get far enough into the login cycle to tell it to reboot into safe mode.

Minor success. After way too many hours, I managed to convince it to boot to safe mode. Managed to log into a profile (lots of messages about how a system restore didn't complete. Yes, I know). Managed to get chkdsk to freaking run. Restarted computer, now running chkdsk. When it finishes that mess, I'll just have to figure out where the log files are....

Going to bed. I suspect chkdsk will be running awhile.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 13, 2017, 05:01:01 PM
Success. No bad sectors, just a ridiculous propagating corruption caused by Windows update. Corrupted something important looking. Managed to get it repaired enough to reset the OS entirely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on May 14, 2017, 07:05:05 PM
Windows Updates take either 10 seconds or 18 hours.

It's fun.

Dell's in particular are a hot fucking mess. My Surface Book is pretty flawless and fast with updates though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on May 19, 2017, 03:57:12 PM
Windows Updates take either 10 seconds or 18 hours.

It's fun.

Dell's in particular are a hot fucking mess. My Surface Book is pretty flawless and fast with updates though.
I spend most of my time with Dells unfucking them. Like...right out of the box it's "Remove all this shit".

Also, McAfee is fucking malware, not a virus scanner.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on May 20, 2017, 07:37:39 PM
Just in case you guys haven't come across it yet, don't buy Office pre-installed on a Dell. I don't but in a thread on the topic of MS's awful new authentication for retail keys, a ton of people are complaining about basically all keys on Dells being pirated. Assumed that it's the Chinese stealing them before they hit the water.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on May 21, 2017, 12:21:09 PM
Honestly, if someone asks me about Office for their home PC these days I just recommend that if they want the genuine MS deal and don't want to deal with LibreOffice's differences they should just get a personal Office365 sub.

Of course, most of the people I give PC advice to these days get it through the Home Use program through their employer's VLA so it doesn't come up often.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 23, 2017, 12:19:17 AM
Inspiration for what to say to people with PC problems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow0lr63y4Mw


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 14, 2017, 10:16:56 AM
Here's an odd one - if a PC has been totally unhooked for about a year, sitting in its box, should I be expecting any issues when I go to boot it back up?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 14, 2017, 11:00:56 AM
It's possible the battery on the bios may have died. Other than that, nothing I can think of.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on June 14, 2017, 11:05:53 AM
Is that thing "just" a battery, and hence easily replaceable?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Merusk on June 14, 2017, 11:25:54 AM
It may depend on the motherboard, but pretty much, yes.  Oh and it's CMOS not Bios.. it *was* Bios a long time ago but these days it's just the clock so you shouldn't have problems like, "Computer has no BIOS, can't boot-up."


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Draegan on August 09, 2017, 07:03:50 AM
Is replacing a screen on a Asus rog laptop as easy as it looks?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on August 25, 2017, 09:32:09 AM
Since I've been out for a while, has anything really changed regarding ethernet cables? I'm having gigabit internet set up in my place, but unfortunately the modem is on the other side of the room from where my PC will be, so I'll need to run may 30ft of cable around the edge of the room over to my PC.

Is there any specific type of cabling I should be looking at, or is grabbing something from Amazon sufficient?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 25, 2017, 01:11:45 PM
Cat5e is fine for gigabit. You can go cat6 if you want but there is really no reason, esp in the >100ft distances you are talking about.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on August 25, 2017, 02:07:18 PM
Don't crimp or bend cat6 if you go that route. It's far less pliable than cat5e, so watch how you bend it around the room corners.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 25, 2017, 02:44:11 PM
Don't crimp or bend cat6 if you go that route. It's far less pliable than cat5e, so watch how you bend it around the room corners.

You don't want to "crimp" any type of cable, ever. That leads to broken conductors.

And while Cat6 is not as flexible as Cat5 due to how the cable is constructed, patch cables made of stranded cable will always be more flexible than ones made of solid.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 26, 2017, 11:00:13 AM
I've got an off the wall question here that maybe should go somewhere else, but here goes.

Anybody know how to get rid of a Google Reminder that won't go away?

Months ago I was planning ahead to cook, so I left a reminder for myself to take the meat out of the freezer to defrost when I got home. Google kinda botched the text of the reminder, so I deleted the original and replaced it with a more grammatical version. Somehow, I managed to confuse it.

So now every once in a while my phone chirps and tells me, "Tonight to take the meat out of the freezer." It has a done button, but when I press it the reminder will only go away for: 1) a few minutes, 2) days, 3) sometimes weeks. Then boom, out of the blue, chime, "Tonight to take the meat out of the freezer."

It's starting to creep me out.

The reminder does not list at all in my history, so can't delete it there. Deleting the Google News cache got rid of it for maybe a month. I thought it was truly gone, then boom, "Tonight to take the meat out of the freezer."

Web searches for this problem have given me nada. There has got to be something simple I'm missing -- anybody have any help?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on August 28, 2017, 07:28:35 AM
I'm just guessing -

Log into google calendar.  Click to show your task list if it is hidden.  Look for a recurring task and delete it or try clicking 'show completed tasks' and delete any ones in there.  Also search your calendar for it in case it's setup as an event, and if so delete it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 28, 2017, 10:37:16 AM
I'm just guessing -

Log into google calendar.  Click to show your task list if it is hidden.  Look for a recurring task and delete it or try clicking 'show completed tasks' and delete any ones in there.  Also search your calendar for it in case it's setup as an event, and if so delete it.

Thanks for the help. Still stumped though. I can even find the old corrected version in the completed tasks ("Take the meat out of the freezer," Aug 2016 -- I've been putting up with this for a year?). This weird "ghost" reminder is not listed anywhere until it shows up.

I'm starting to think that Google AI has developed a really bad sense of humor...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on August 28, 2017, 11:03:27 AM
I guess iPhone I uses google calendar and Android uses the google app.  Any chance you're on Android?  Best of luck, that would drive me crazy!

https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/3122344?co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&oco=1


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 28, 2017, 11:13:38 AM
I guess iPhone I uses google calendar and Android uses the google app.  Any chance you're on Android?  Best of luck, that would drive me crazy!

https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/3122344?co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&oco=1

Yep, on Android.

Guess I'll have to file a support ticket, for all the good that will do. Or just learn to live with "Tonight to take the meat out of the freezer."

There are worse problems I guess...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 30, 2017, 07:22:40 AM
Library site hacked. Fucking Russkies.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on September 07, 2017, 03:24:59 PM
I'm getting an Invalid Security Certificate error when trying to visit f13 on my desktop. Phone and laptop work fine. I had to add a security exception in order to get here; not sure if there's something I fucked up but it just started happening randomly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on September 07, 2017, 03:29:24 PM
I'm getting an Invalid Security Certificate error when trying to visit f13 on my desktop. Phone and laptop work fine. I had to add a security exception in order to get here; not sure if there's something I fucked up but it just started happening randomly.
Working as intended :awesome_for_real:

We don't have a proper SSL cert for f13.net at the moment -- just the generic self-signed one that's created as part of the control panel that came with the server.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ceryse on October 19, 2017, 07:30:25 PM
I'm hoping someone here can help me with something that has me stumped;

One of the computers on my network (I have three) isn't able to even come close to the upload speeds it should. It should be getting 150/150 down/up, but is getting 174/0.6 down/up. The other two computers on the network are getting a consistent 174/148 down/up.

I have no idea why this is the case, but it seems to be a Windows issue and not a hardware issue as when I booted into a portable OS (Ubuntu) I was getting the proper speeds; 172/146. I've looked at the various settings I can find and compared them across all three computers and they are all identical (all of them are wired and using Windows 7).

This kind of thing is way outside my wheelhouse and I haven't found much via google that would seem to help. The problem has been on-going for months now -- I'm not entirely sure when it started. Anyone got an idea?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on October 19, 2017, 07:58:29 PM
Probably a driver issue. See if you can find an updated one for your network/wireless card?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 19, 2017, 08:12:32 PM
Sounds like a duplex issue, like your card is set to half duplex.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ceryse on October 20, 2017, 11:20:35 PM
Turned out neither was the issue (drivers are one of the first thing I check, and it was set to Full Duplex). To be honest, I still don't know what the exact issue was. I fixed it by doing something in the router settings. I fiddled with it for a few hours, rebooted the computer and.. problem solved.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on October 30, 2017, 06:21:25 AM
I'm having a strange issue on one of my PCs.   It works fine all day but then when I wake up in the morning it's powered off and will not power back on.  Even holding the power button down does nothing.  When it's in this weird state, the media reader on the front still has it's light on, so it still has some amount of power going to it.  If I unplug the PC for 10 seconds or so and then try, it powers right up.

The second time this happened, it booted to a bios corrupted screen and it had to restore the bios.

I'm not sure if it's a power supply or a motherboard issue.  I've had issues with an identical motherboard in one of my other PCs, so I'm leaning towards the motherboard just going bad.  Curious if anyone has an ideas.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 30, 2017, 12:35:35 PM
It's easier to swap out a power supply so I would do that first. Also if you aren't plugged into an UPS with AVR (preferably with sine wave output) I would do that too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on November 01, 2017, 07:15:52 PM
So this is more for my own personal edification, as the laptop's under warranty and so it's being fixed free of charge.

Hybrid drive and it's failing in the weirdest way. Sometimes it'll boot, sometimes it won't. It's sluggish as hell (and has been for awhile, possibly the whole time we've had it. That usual damn 100% hard drive usage thing. I'll fix it, and it'll come back). Anyways, SSD's portion's not popping up on the hardware menu when I run diagnostics, it's failing at least one of the hard drive diagnostics as well. Intel Rapid Storage Technology complained at least once that the SSD failed.

But....my experience with hard drives is the pretty much either work, or they don't.

So what's going on? Can the SSD fail independently? Bad card? Loose connection?

I mean my best guess is the SSD is dead, or at least not working properly and failing a lot, which would account for why it's randomly slow as shit but that I never seem to find bad sectors or a corrupt OS or any of the usual signs of hard drive failure, and why it generally boots.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 02, 2017, 05:13:35 AM
I had one cosair ssd go funky just as you described. Turns out it was a failing seagate conventional drive on the same controller. Took it out, ssd has been fine for the past year.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on November 21, 2017, 02:03:52 PM
I'm completely lost on a family over the phone tech support.

1. User cleans dust and shit out of computer. Boots up. Gets ASUS "power surge detected" message. You are supposed to be able to access BIOS from this, when hitting F1 to access the rig just hangs indefinitely.

Things that don't help:
-reseating everything.
-boot without GPU
-CMOS cleear

So to my layman brain it sounds like one of those shit is this PSU or Mobo things. To me trying a diff PSU is the obvious move.

BUT here's the "wtf does this mean" thing for me that I have to think has significance but I'm completely lost on:

I said "try with 1 stick of RAM" here are the results of messing w/ ram configs.
-either stick by itself in any of the 4 DIMMS = computer will not even complete power up, fans start to spin, power goes off thing happens
-the mobo manual
http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/LGA1155/P8Z77-V_LE/E7505-P8Z77-V_LE.pdf
recommends using the blue "high compatibility" DIMMS

BUT

the 2 sticks in the blue DIMMS no power up
the 2 sticks in the black DIMMS will power up but only with a specific ordering of sticks. So like Stick X in one of the DIMMS and Stick Y in the other.

what the fuck? I've honestly never come across odd shit like this when doing the 1 stick thing.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 21, 2017, 04:08:36 PM
The one stick not working is weird, unless it's only the blue slots that can handle the single/odd sticks (1 or 3 sticks total) and both the blue slots are now bad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on November 22, 2017, 07:33:46 PM
They say the blues are higher compat but 1 stick in any of the 4 is supposedly acceptable. But no single stick in any slot can post

Mystery to me but im expecting a report on what happens w a diff psu soon


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on November 22, 2017, 07:37:50 PM
Can anyone suggest a wireless router for gaming and streaming tv (sling, netflix, etc) that is a decent bang-for-buck?

Currently have an ASUS NT 66U, so would need something that would be a decent upgrade.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on November 22, 2017, 07:38:47 PM
I've had the Netgear AC1750 for about 6 months and have no complaints.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 22, 2017, 08:47:55 PM
Can anyone suggest a wireless router for gaming and streaming tv (sling, netflix, etc) that is a decent bang-for-buck?

Currently have an ASUS NT 66U, so would need something that would be a decent upgrade.

Thanks.
I have the TP Link AC1900 Archer C9 and it's pretty nice (I matched it with a TP Link AC1200 Archer T4UH high gain adapter). Having the Gb port for the NAS was my main reason to get it, but the speeds are good. Recent talk here about vulnerabilities in pretty much all consumer routers saw me put the Mikrotik RouterBoard hAP AC on my wishlist.

Assuming you have upgraded your cable modem to a DOCSIS 3? I have a Motorola Surfboard SB6141 that bumped up my speeds nicely.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Nebu on November 22, 2017, 08:49:11 PM
Assuming you have upgraded your cable modem to a DOCSIS 3? I have a Motorola Surfboard SB6141 that bumped up my speeds nicely.

I did and thank you for the suggestions!



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 23, 2017, 03:30:59 AM
Mikrotik hAP AC: will cost you less than anything that looks like a spaceship, will be faster, and they update their software regularly.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on December 08, 2017, 08:31:04 PM
Wasn't sure where to ask this, so I figured here was about as good as anywhere else.

I am looking for an App / Widget / Gadget / whatever that will interact with a Google Sheets spreadsheet to give me the ability to build a simple, interactive, Button Based User Interface element for the Data in the sheet.   The end product I am looking to design is basically similar to an Othello Game board (except using hexes), where clicking on a grid hex will toggle the hex state, as well as toggle any adjoining hex states based on set conditions.  I pretty much have all the data and toggle relationship logic worked out, I just can't find any kind of solution to attaching it to a GUI that doesn't either look massively fucking ugly (I CAN do it entirely inside a Google Sheet, but the result is Intensely god awful to look at and needlessly complicated), or require me to pretty much teach myself an entire programming language just so I can build my own app.

Surely there must be SOME kind of already built app that lets me make something with interactive buttons that reference google sheet cells.....


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on December 09, 2017, 09:32:57 AM
I have never seen anything like that - the closest thing I can think of is this bit of code we heavily modified for our use to rip the data out of the sheet and into a JSON blob: http://blog.pamelafox.org/2013/06/exporting-google-spreadsheet-as-json.html

But that would be working away from your problem, not towards it. Maybe it will spark and idea though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on December 29, 2017, 11:00:35 AM
Once again I think I am making something relatively simple into something way harder than it has to be.

This is a networking issue. Here is what I have right now, stripped to fundamentals (sorry for the dropbox link, imgur is being a pain right now).

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kg9cfgmygpza5bd/WhatIHaveNow.jpg?dl=0

The MBR1200 is actually a good cellular compatible modem/router that allows me to switch at will from multiple WAN sources, set up failover states, the whole nine yards. I can easily switch my internet source from EVDO to Satellite from the comfort of my sofa. The only problem is the way I have it set up now is that it is all or nothing, when I would rather have both networks operating side by side, like this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gvlq5fafn0v2og0/WhatIWant.jpg?dl=0

What kind of switch would work in the ???? spot? Is this thing  (https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAE8J6H57023&cm_re=dual_wan_router-_-9SIAE8J6H57023-_-Product) what I want? Or some other hub or switch?



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hoax on December 29, 2017, 01:32:14 PM
They say the blues are higher compat but 1 stick in any of the 4 is supposedly acceptable. But no single stick in any slot can post

Mystery to me but im expecting a report on what happens w a diff psu soon

Something died on the mobo, haven't been able to figure out what/why/how but swapping PSU was not a fix swapping out mobo for a replacement (same board) fixed it EZ.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2017, 06:53:56 AM
Once again I think I am making something relatively simple into something way harder than it has to be.

This is a networking issue. Here is what I have right now, stripped to fundamentals (sorry for the dropbox link, imgur is being a pain right now).

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kg9cfgmygpza5bd/WhatIHaveNow.jpg?dl=0

The MBR1200 is actually a good cellular compatible modem/router that allows me to switch at will from multiple WAN sources, set up failover states, the whole nine yards. I can easily switch my internet source from EVDO to Satellite from the comfort of my sofa. The only problem is the way I have it set up now is that it is all or nothing, when I would rather have both networks operating side by side, like this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gvlq5fafn0v2og0/WhatIWant.jpg?dl=0

What kind of switch would work in the ???? spot? Is this thing  (https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAE8J6H57023&cm_re=dual_wan_router-_-9SIAE8J6H57023-_-Product) what I want? Or some other hub or switch?



You need a load balancer, not a switch. Search for "WAN load balancing" on google for more details.

You can probably do it with a Mikrotik since they are mega feature rich but balancing across separate links that go to different providers and use different technologies is always a pain in the ass to get right and for a home use case is basically way more hassle than it is worth. When I worked at an ISP we did some load balancing and out network engineers had to tweak shit daily to fix issues our customers at those sites were having.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on December 30, 2017, 08:49:18 AM
Once again I think I am making something relatively simple into something way harder than it has to be.

This is a networking issue. Here is what I have right now, stripped to fundamentals (sorry for the dropbox link, imgur is being a pain right now).

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kg9cfgmygpza5bd/WhatIHaveNow.jpg?dl=0

The MBR1200 is actually a good cellular compatible modem/router that allows me to switch at will from multiple WAN sources, set up failover states, the whole nine yards. I can easily switch my internet source from EVDO to Satellite from the comfort of my sofa. The only problem is the way I have it set up now is that it is all or nothing, when I would rather have both networks operating side by side, like this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gvlq5fafn0v2og0/WhatIWant.jpg?dl=0

What kind of switch would work in the ???? spot? Is this thing  (https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAE8J6H57023&cm_re=dual_wan_router-_-9SIAE8J6H57023-_-Product) what I want? Or some other hub or switch?



You need a load balancer, not a switch. Search for "WAN load balancing" on google for more details.

You can probably do it with a Mikrotik since they are mega feature rich but balancing across separate links that go to different providers and use different technologies is always a pain in the ass to get right and for a home use case is basically way more hassle than it is worth. When I worked at an ISP we did some load balancing and out network engineers had to tweak shit daily to fix issues our customers at those sites were having.

Thanks for taking a look at this Chimpy -- I know I can come up with some really oddball home use cases. The thing is I can achieve pretty much what I want by physically walking upstairs and swapping some cables around. I was hoping for some type of switchboard contraption that would automate the process.

Googling and searching for WAN load balancing on Newegg takes me right back to the Dual Wan Router (https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAE8J6H57023&cm_re=dual_wan_router-_-9SIAE8J6H57023-_-Product) that I put in the link. It looks like some cheapy Chinese knockoff but it's on sale for fifty bucks. One complication is that I have to use the Cradlepoint MBR1200 router to connect to the cellular receiver, which means I'd have to go Cellular receiver => MBR1200 => Dual Wan Router, which I guess would work, even though it seriously under utilizes the Cradlepoint.

Do you see any reason that sort of daisy chain wouldn't work?

Again, thanks for glancing at this. I know any professional who actually looked at my home setup would probably run away screaming.

 :why_so_serious:


Edit for clarity: With the setup I have right now I can already switch at will between one internet source and another using the Cradlepoint, but the problem is it switches the entire network. I want to have two networks running simultaneously, but pick and choose which one I want to hook up to from the entertainment system. Obviously if I left everything wireless that would be easy, but my house is sprawling and I already have a cable ran, so I'd like to use it. Plus, streaming just generally sucks with WiFi anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on December 30, 2017, 10:45:06 AM
Call me old fashioned but if I ever felt a need to have different upstream providers I would just physically switch the cables as necessary because the only ways to make things "easy to switch" requires an amount of work and expense on hardware that I am not willing to invest.

You should move somewhere with better internet options.  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 02, 2018, 06:48:22 AM
Streaming what? I'm only streaming 1080p video, but it's fine over wifi.

edit: with good transceivers on both ends. Fiancee has a crappy one in her laptop and struggles a bit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on January 02, 2018, 09:47:52 AM
Streaming what? I'm only streaming 1080p video, but it's fine over wifi.

edit: with good transceivers on both ends. Fiancee has a crappy one in her laptop and struggles a bit.

Game streaming, which requires a lot of back and forth of course. I have a gaming rig set up in my office that I stream to a microPC connected to the media center in the living room. Works pretty well as long as I keep it plugged in. That said, I could beef up my wifi, add another repeater or maybe even go the whole mesh route, but I already got this ethernet cable running through the walls, and games stream through it pretty well lagless right now. I just want to have the best of all worlds.

I think I do have it figured out, just waiting on a part.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 12, 2018, 02:36:46 AM
So what IS the console of choice these days ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 12, 2018, 07:41:14 AM
Switch or PS4 (regular, not Pro).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 12, 2018, 11:42:55 AM
Why not Pro ?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 12, 2018, 01:14:13 PM
Basically Sony left it up to each developer/publisher how they want to support the more powerful hardware in the Pro. And the extra hardware in the Pro is not powerful enough to real native 4K at locked 30fps or 60fps for the most demanding graphics titles that do support 4k so compromises have to be made in various ways (less resolution upscaled or checkerboarding, FPS not locked, etc.). And 1080p users don't necessarily benefit from a better experience either. So if you care about this sort of thing you have to research each game you are thinking about getting to see whether or not it supports 4k or runs better at 1080p and what that experience might be like.

Digital Foundry is the best source I found for a technical examination of how games run on the PS4 Pro but they only examine a small subset of them:

https://www.youtube.com/user/DigitalFoundry/search?query=ps4+pro

Other references:

https://www.polygon.com/2017/6/5/15684152/playstation-4-pro-interview (state of the Pro back in June, not actually an interview)
http://www.ign.com/wikis/playstation-4/PS4_Pro_Game_Upgrades_and_Differences
https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/235274-how-sonys-playstation-4-pro-does-4k-without-delivering-4k
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkerboard_rendering


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 12, 2018, 01:57:16 PM
I would've bought a PS4 for the games, but I prefer the MS controller. Yes, I'm aware there are ways around that.

Still, apart from PS exclusives (which are enough to warrant buying the PS4 imo), the xbone is a solid machine that does what a console needs to do. Xbone S if you go that way.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Samwise on January 12, 2018, 02:07:59 PM
I like my PS4 well enough but haven't compared vs the Xbone.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 18, 2018, 09:31:44 AM
No one is buying Xboxen, from what I gather.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 18, 2018, 10:00:36 AM
No one is buying Xboxen, from what I gather.
Gather skill -1

(https://i.imgur.com/DiDsdkd.png)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 19, 2018, 02:14:47 PM
That's because everyone already has a PS4, jackass. :awesome_for_real:

Why would MS give a Xbox to Terry Crews that had both his name and his face on it? Because they need to sell a few units and are scraping the fuck out of that barrel.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 19, 2018, 02:53:03 PM
I honestly struggle to think of one game that I'd need to buy the Xbox One for - the latest Forza games are the only ones that come to mind. However, now that I have Gran Turismo Sport on the PS4, Forza has no draw.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 19, 2018, 03:04:23 PM
If you have a decent gaming PC there's almost no reason to get an Xbox One cause all the newest Microsoft games like Forza are on both.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Strazos on January 21, 2018, 12:44:11 PM
I'm just curious about the people still buying a 360 or PS3.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 21, 2018, 12:56:55 PM
I've actually thought about getting a PS3 on the cheap just to grab some games I've missed but nothing has been so monumental that I have to go out and do it right this minute.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on January 21, 2018, 08:15:23 PM
 The Switch has a fine lineup, but you've played literally all of it before. The Switch, also, I would not call a home console. It shines as a portable unit.

The PS4/Pro is the best box for just games.

The Xbox is a fucking joke and Microsoft should kill it. But if you really want to watch 4k Blu-Rays, the XboneS or whatever is your only option among the consoles.

tl;dr: This console generation is the exact same as EVERY OTHER GENERATION since the PlayStation first came out.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 22, 2018, 09:20:12 AM
I've actually been really happy with my PS4 but I can say this generation is really the first console generation where there seems to be literally no reason to own every single console unless you are just OCD and have to have everything. Platform exclusives are so rare nowadays and I'm not sure there's enough of a difference in hardware for one to matter over the other. The Switch's portable option seems a neat trick but again unless you are a big Zelda or Mario fan, there's not much of a library for it to push it over a PS4 or Xbone.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on January 24, 2018, 03:35:53 PM
Is anyone using a curved display for gaming? How is it? Does it distort/confuse the picture on the sides?

Something like this:     https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-34-Inch-Widescreen-Monitor-C34F791/dp/B01M1D7JVO


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on January 25, 2018, 08:02:27 AM
Is anyone using a curved display for gaming? How is it? Does it distort/confuse the picture on the sides?

Something like this:     https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-34-Inch-Widescreen-Monitor-C34F791/dp/B01M1D7JVO
If you sit at the focal point, it actually removes the distortion you have learned to ignore on flat screens. If you sit considerable closer or farther than that, no so much, but still no worse than a flat screen.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on January 26, 2018, 03:49:24 AM
So. I am baffled.

I upgraded to a Geforce GTX 1060 6 GB.
I used to use a rather old Flatscreen TV (Telefunken brand, an old German manufactor that has been sold to some Turkish company and ceased to do any customer support at all) as my monitor via HDMI. There was the odd bug that I would only be able to boot up my PC when the HDMI cable was not connected to said TV, I could connect tit just fine once I got past the first windows screen.
Now. With my new Geforce card I run into a different problem. I can see my desktop on the TV but for some reason the TV itself does not seem to be able to detect that it is actually connected so I get a rather annoying pop up on the screen telling me the device is going to shut down in 5:00 minutes.
I'll try to rephrase that to make it more clear.

TLDR: I try to connect an old TV via HDMI to my PC and the TV does not detect the connection, but it displays the desktop just fine before shutting down after 5 minutes.

Any ideas ? German television is garbage so I have no other use for that thing. :grin:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on January 27, 2018, 06:03:06 AM
Might be the cable, I had a similar ssue with a Dell monitor at work and it was the cheap minidisplay port cable they shipped with the monitor.

Telefunken used to make the best reel to reel tape recorders  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on January 28, 2018, 11:47:38 AM
My PC's power button appears to be dying; turning the PC on requires me to kinda wiggle the button and press several times to get it to boot up. Is this a replacable part, generally, or should I look into buying a new case? Are there any ways of booting a PC without using the power button?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on January 28, 2018, 11:59:11 AM
The mechanism behind the button might be replaceable but it depends on how "custom" your case is (i.e. whether or not it uses a non-standard switch). You can also get a replacement generic switch (https://www.amazon.com/Electop-Power-Button-Computer-Switch/dp/B01LMZZFWO/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1517169404&sr=8-4&keywords=power+switch) and just bypass the button on the case. Some motherboards also have a setting in BIOS to power on via the keyboard. Otherwise in an emergency you can short the two power switch pins on the motherboard header yourself with a screwdriver, paperclip, etc.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tale on January 28, 2018, 02:01:26 PM
So. I am baffled.

I upgraded to a Geforce GTX 1060 6 GB.
I used to use a rather old Flatscreen TV (Telefunken brand, an old German manufactor that has been sold to some Turkish company and ceased to do any customer support at all) as my monitor via HDMI. There was the odd bug that I would only be able to boot up my PC when the HDMI cable was not connected to said TV, I could connect tit just fine once I got past the first windows screen.
Now. With my new Geforce card I run into a different problem. I can see my desktop on the TV but for some reason the TV itself does not seem to be able to detect that it is actually connected so I get a rather annoying pop up on the screen telling me the device is going to shut down in 5:00 minutes.
I'll try to rephrase that to make it more clear.

TLDR: I try to connect an old TV via HDMI to my PC and the TV does not detect the connection, but it displays the desktop just fine before shutting down after 5 minutes.

Any ideas ? German television is garbage so I have no other use for that thing. :grin:

It depends what you want to run on your PC and display on your TV, but I picked up a cheap second-hand Alienware Alpha R1 as a secondary machine to use with my TV. It is a small gaming PC that looks like a console, designed to be connected to a TV. It's good at running games released up until about a year ago, so I found lots of people were selling them in order to upgrade. I sometimes also do my work from home on it. I added a Roccat Sova couch gaming keyboard. Cost me a few hundred bucks all up, and leaves my other PC in a more office-like environment in another room.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on January 28, 2018, 02:37:28 PM
I added a Roccat Sova couch gaming keyboard.
Oooo....

I was wondering why nobody had made one yet. I probably should've invented that 15 years ago! Though I am pretty used to them being separate.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Der Helm on January 29, 2018, 09:14:32 AM
Might be the cable, I had a similar ssue with a Dell monitor at work and it was the cheap minidisplay port cable they shipped with the monitor.

Telefunken used to make the best reel to reel tape recorders  :why_so_serious:
Tried different cables, no luck. I connected an Amazon Fire stick, just for testing purposes, same "no sognal detected" message.
Deactivated and then reactivated all avaible Sources in the OSD-menu and now at least the fire stick works.
Weird.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on June 11, 2018, 05:00:11 PM
Where do we stand on password managers at the moment? It looks like 1Password shifted to cloud based storage from what I can see, wondering if there are better alternatives but also trying to get an easy to use program to keep my family using it too.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 11, 2018, 05:15:13 PM
What's wrong with cloud-based storage? The 1Password password file is encrypted so even if they somehow got into the cloud storage account it'll take a substantial level of work (like NSA-level) to unencrypt your password file assuming you didn't use a weak password.

I'm still using older non-subscription 1Password versions (OS X, Windows, iOS, Android) with Dropbox as the shared storage mechanism so I can't really help you on alternatives. I do check every once in a while but haven't heard of anything better.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on June 11, 2018, 05:20:21 PM
Where do we stand on password managers at the moment? It looks like 1Password shifted to cloud based storage from what I can see, wondering if there are better alternatives but also trying to get an easy to use program to keep my family using it too.
I've started using Google Auth for 2FA on everything that supports it. If it involves money and doesn't support it, it's a reminder to use payment methods that can't tap my bank account directly. Squarecash, usually (it informs me immediately of every transaction).

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on June 11, 2018, 06:57:09 PM
Thanks both. I'm using 2FA for anything that offers it. I just need to get a secure handle on all my passwords.

It looks like 1Password is now a subscription only service and works somewhat like LastPass, which has had a few notable security flaws over the last few years. However, it looks like 1Password hasn't had the same flaws come to light yet. I'm just being cheap and don't want to pay a sub. :/


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on June 12, 2018, 05:51:12 AM
I still use KeePass.  It's free but there's no mobile or cloud support (at least that I'm aware of), I back it up to manually.

Works great though.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on June 12, 2018, 02:09:37 PM
If you have iOS devices, Codebook (was Strip Password Manager previously) is pretty awesome in terms of usability. It has a Windows/Mac client that you get like 5 installs for if you buy a license (separate from the few bucks for the iphone version). It can sync via wifi, dropbox, and google drive.

I have been using it for probably 4 years now and like it a lot overall.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Teleku on July 11, 2018, 06:29:28 AM
So, question for anybody who may know.

I just built myself a new PC (wooo).  I made sure to link my Windows 10 installation to my Microsoft account on the old machine, and have the actual product key written down as well.  However, I apparently forgot to deactivate my old installation on the old machine (boo) before I ripped it apart and formatted the drive.  I have 10 installed on this new rig, but it informs me they cannot activate it (obviously still letting me use it for the time being).  They wont take my product key, and even though I'm logged in under my Microsoft account, wont recognize my digital licence.  When I hit the option that says 'made hardware changes recently', it shows my old PC.  If I tell it that 'that's the device I'm currently using' (which is literally my only option I can choose) it errors out and says it can't activate. 

So, question is, if I forgot to deactivate my install on the old machine that is now dead and gone, is there any way to get Microsoft to transfer my active windows 10 licence to the new machine?  1.)  Hoping there is a way to do it without having to get on the phone with MS tech support for 5 hours from Laos.  2.)  Want to know ahead of time if MS will just tell me to fuck off in this situation anyways before I get on the phone with them for 5 hours.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on July 11, 2018, 08:36:05 AM
MS was a cunt about my reinstall on a new drive in the SAME MACHINE. So I just bought a new copy of W10, because it cost less than my time trying to get them to understand something so simple.

I'm sure that's the plan, anyway.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on July 11, 2018, 11:51:45 AM
So, question for anybody who may know.

I just built myself a new PC (wooo).  I made sure to link my Windows 10 installation to my Microsoft account on the old machine, and have the actual product key written down as well.  However, I apparently forgot to deactivate my old installation on the old machine (boo) before I ripped it apart and formatted the drive.  I have 10 installed on this new rig, but it informs me they cannot activate it (obviously still letting me use it for the time being).  They wont take my product key, and even though I'm logged in under my Microsoft account, wont recognize my digital licence.  When I hit the option that says 'made hardware changes recently', it shows my old PC.  If I tell it that 'that's the device I'm currently using' (which is literally my only option I can choose) it errors out and says it can't activate. 

So, question is, if I forgot to deactivate my install on the old machine that is now dead and gone, is there any way to get Microsoft to transfer my active windows 10 licence to the new machine?  1.)  Hoping there is a way to do it without having to get on the phone with MS tech support for 5 hours from Laos.  2.)  Want to know ahead of time if MS will just tell me to fuck off in this situation anyways before I get on the phone with them for 5 hours.



I haven't had to in a while, but the times I've had to call Microsoft tech support over an activation issue usually was completed promptly. Like maybe five minutes tops -- they had the process streamlined pretty well.

That said, this was before Windows 10, so maybe they're being pricks about it now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 12, 2018, 10:13:35 PM
I believe if you read the fine print, individually licensed copies of Windows are not transferable between computers. At least that was the case with previous versions. Not sure what the fuck is up with Windows 10.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Teleku on July 13, 2018, 04:49:04 AM
Yeah, I'm getting info all over the place on that when I google.  Hypothetically, you can deactivate your current install of windows via command line.  Then when you go to install onto a new machine, it will activate.  But I forgot to do that before I killed my old machine, and even on that I'm seeing mixed info.  Oh well, weekends here, I'll have time to give them a call and see whats what.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on July 13, 2018, 08:37:54 PM
I believe if you read the fine print, individually licensed copies of Windows are not transferable between computers. At least that was the case with previous versions. Not sure what the fuck is up with Windows 10.

I usually referred it it as an "upgrade," not a new computer. As in I  have just replaced the power supply, case, motherboard, hard drive, ram, cpu and optical drive. Other than that, it's the same computer...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 12, 2018, 10:08:31 PM
Does anyone have any (preferably free or cheap) networking software recommendations for home use?

I'm getting kinda tired of having to redo all my networking shares every dang major Windows update. Maybe the problem is I am stubbornly not using the Homegroup option, but just sharing specific folders between various machines. And pretty much every big update the network forgets itself.

And yes thanks but even though "Don't use Windows" is appreciated, but it's the devil I know.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 12, 2018, 10:21:16 PM
If you have a good Internet connection, use a cloud solution (Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, etc.)?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on August 12, 2018, 10:54:08 PM
I'm just curious about the people still buying a 360 or PS3.
Far as I know, a PS3 is still a pretty nice investment because it has software emulator support for like 98% of the PS1 library, so you are basically getting 2 consoles for the price of one.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Tale on August 13, 2018, 12:11:11 AM
I'm just curious about the people still buying a 360 or PS3.
Far as I know, a PS3 is still a pretty nice investment because it has software emulator support for like 98% of the PS1 library, so you are basically getting 2 consoles for the price of one.

Woo... 8 month answers. I wanna too.

I still have a PS3 because I spend all my time using a console-style gaming PC so I haven't upgraded to the current generation of actual consoles. I find the PS3 controls and apps very laggy compared with today's other devices, but it is still usable and playable. They have upgraded the PlayStation Store software to the point where it's supposed to be seamless with the PS4 version, but that just makes it very laggy. On the other hand, it's still a VERY worthy Blu-Ray player and I used it just the other night to watch one. It's hooked up to a new 4K OLED TV that has built-in Netflix and Amazon Prime, so I don't have much call for Blu-Rays, but the PS3 is faster than the actual Blu-Ray player attached to the TV in the other room.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on August 13, 2018, 12:17:11 AM
Hah, oops.  Just realized how old that post I replied to was.  That's what I get for just browsing back to the previous page while half asleep.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 13, 2018, 10:35:15 AM
If you have a good Internet connection, use a cloud solution (Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, etc.)?


Satellite, and capped. Cloud based is okay for small files, but multi gig video and stuff takes a lot of time and burns out my cap pretty fast.

It's actually not such a big deal to reset the shares every time I guess. Every third party solution I've looked into looked like it would take a similar level of fiddling with from time to time too -- so six of one, half dozen of the other...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 13, 2018, 10:46:09 AM
Get a NAS then?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 13, 2018, 02:03:57 PM
What Trippy is trying to say is that you need to use anything other than shared folders on your Win workstation. Some dedicated "thing" that you aren't using for work/play. I'm probably going to finally buy a NAS soon, despite being all cloudy and shit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 13, 2018, 02:43:15 PM
Weeellll, you see...

Right now I do have a Network Attached Storage "solution." It's an old Acer laptop with some external storage disks hooked up with USB cables.

It honestly works pretty well. I stream movies from it with no hitch using Kodi, and also use it as a central server for music and such. It's just that it uses whatever witchcraft Windows works by to transfer files from other devices on the local network, and sometimes it forgets where everything is and I have to reset shares.

Thus why I was asking if there was a better third party way to tie it all together. Or I could just keep taking the five minutes it takes every few months to tell it where all the transfer folders are on the other machines.

I appreciate the answers.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 15, 2018, 04:55:15 AM
If you are wanting to map shared folders on Windows machines on a local network, you are always going to be using SMB even if you are running a NAS so if your non-server machines are losing their shared drive mappings on updates they are probably going to lose them on updates if you are using a NAS.

But using a laptop as a file server might actually be more of your problem than the windows part.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 15, 2018, 09:32:24 AM


But using a laptop as a file server might actually be more of your problem than the windows part.



True. The thing is it "just works." It responds to WOL, and I can remote into it to perform more general computing tasks such as file downloading, or making perfectly legal backup copies of DVDs, that sort of thing. It's a good way to keep from throwing away an old obsolete machine.

One of these days it'll die and I'll get a proper NAS -- or go completely nuts and try to repurpose one of these old Android 4.1 tablets I have laying around....


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 15, 2018, 10:59:22 AM
LOL ... ?  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 17, 2018, 10:59:33 AM


But using a laptop as a file server might actually be more of your problem than the windows part.



True. The thing is it "just works."

If you are complaining about things being broken, then it isn't "just working" :p


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Mandella on August 17, 2018, 07:13:02 PM
Ha ha. Some maintenance is always required -- especially if I'm the engineer.

So digging into the problem otherwise, I've found the issue. Microsoft has depreciated Homegroup and reworked how files are transferred. They really, really want you to use OneDrive even on a LAN.

Right. I don't think so. But you can still just share out files by individual user or Everyone, so that works, for now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on October 04, 2018, 02:25:42 AM
Might be a bit of a long shot, but I figure there must be a few AV technophiles on here, so I have a question:

I work at a movie theater.  We frequently have corporate bookings and groups that rent out our theaters for presentations.  Our current AV setup for such events is, to put it loosely, "antiquated".  We usually end up running a longass VGA / Audio cable from all the way up in the projection booth down to the front of the theater so they can connect a laptop to it for presentations.  The VGA cable is for the video, obviously, and the Audio cable runs into a fairly basic mixer board we use in the event that they also need to mix in a signal from a Wireless Microphone.  The sad part is, we COULD be using an HDMI connection, but we usually can't, because the way our external inputs are set up for the projectors, we have no way to mix an HDMI input + the Mixer for audio (meaning if we want to use HDMI we are unable to use the Microphones).

I know there are a load of HDMI extender / splitter box type options.  Google and Amazon are stuffed to the gills with options when I search.  However, what I am looking for is something basic that will take a Stereo Audio Input (jack type does not matter, we can work around that) + an HDMI input, and output both as a single HDMI output signal.

Anyone familiar with anything of that nature?  Everything I can find seems to do the opposite: take one HDMI signal in and output everything else imaginable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on October 04, 2018, 06:29:52 AM
I’m not 100% sure but I think you’re looking for an HDMI audio embedder. They also make deembedders which is the opposite of your use case.  Take a look at these and see if that makes sense.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/Embedders-De-Embedders/ci/8070/N/4028759656

https://www.amazon.com/gofanco-Prophecy-Audio-Extractor-Embedder/dp/B07F6QXP7N/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1538659527&sr=8-3&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=hdmi+audio+embedder&dpPl=1&dpID=313sVI0G94L&ref=plSrch



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 04, 2018, 05:43:10 PM
Wait, so your projectors can't use HDMI audio but you want to merge HDMI + audio IN to an HDMI OUT?

First off, I think you should invest in a set of HDMI extenders that use Cat6 cable so you can have a jack on the wall by the screen and then one in the projection booth.

Take your pick of one of these depending upon your needs: https://www.monoprice.com/category/HDMI-Extender/12146486

Then, if you want to split out the audio from the HDMI signal from Mr Laptop in your projection booth and send it to your mixer that has your mics etc as inputs and your house speakers as outputs you can use something like this: https://www.fullcompass.com/prod/536620-tripp-lite-p130-000-audio-uhd-4kx2k-hdmi-audio-de-embedder-extracter-?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI3u3jiYju3QIVCLnACh16uAC0EAQYAyABEgIaTfD_BwE

TrippLite probably makes the HDMI extenders as well. They are a good quality brand in my experience and usually price competitive with the alibaba re-brand specials you find on Amazon.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on October 04, 2018, 10:19:39 PM
Quote
Wait, so your projectors can't use HDMI audio but you want to merge HDMI + audio IN to an HDMI OUT?
Nah, the projectors can do HDMI video and audio from an external source just fine (ie, we can hook a Blue Ray player up and everything works perfectly).  What they can't do is an HDMI connection + second audio source simultaneously (Ie, Blue Ray player + secondary audio source, such as a microphone).

The amazon link Hawkbit suggested is pretty much exactly what I am looking for.

And yeah, we are probably going to look into one of the HDMI to cat6/7 extender kits as well.

General idea is:
Laptop Out (HDMI) + Audio feed from Mixer for Microphones -> Embedder Device (Outputs HDMI video + combined Audio signal) -> HDMI Extender (will need about 100 to 150 foot range) -> HDMI input on projector.

A short and sweet summary of what I want is basically the equivalent of a Karaoke box, just without the attached microphones (since we have our own):  Something that can take an existing HDMI signal (audio and video) and ADD a second Audio stream into it, with the output result being an HDMI output containing the Video stream + both combined audio streams.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on October 04, 2018, 11:02:57 PM
After thinking about it in terms of Karaoke, I stumbled across this on amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/HDMI-Karaoke-Mixer-Amplifier-Connector/dp/B07FNVZ15D/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1538719195&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=HDMI+Karaoke&psc=1

which seems to be practically perfect for what we are looking for.

(I did notice that quite a lot of the "audio inserters / embedders" that were listed were actually more like "audio replacers" which would filter out and remove the original HDMI audio track and replace it with the external track, which wasn't exactly what we were looking for).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 05, 2018, 11:02:12 AM
You need to split out the audio (with device like I linked) patch it into your mixer with your mics, and then embed it back in with one of the other type devices. That is both the easiest and the best quality output option.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 06, 2018, 05:56:13 AM
Anyone have experience with Crowdstrike on linux?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on November 07, 2018, 11:30:47 PM
It’s required to install if you work where we do.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 08, 2018, 07:46:58 AM
Very helpful  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 12, 2019, 08:12:19 AM
Does anyone have a recommendation for free or sub-$50 photo slideshow software? I need to run a loop of ~500 jpeg for about 8 hours. Microsoft photos will technically do that, yet it doesn’t allow for adjustment of slide time or image text layover for a few of the photos where I want to display a name.

I’m also still waiting to see what the technical layout of the place is, not sure it I can run this off usb stick or if I’ll have to run it off hdmi from my notebook. Anyways, any advice would be great, please.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on March 12, 2019, 07:15:19 PM
We were using screenly for a psuedo video-wall thing at work, not sure how much it costs (though I know it was pretty cheap) or what features still exist as they apparently changed how it worked.

It ran off a Raspberry Pi connecting to their website where the slideshow was setup.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on April 08, 2019, 08:34:13 PM
My PS4 will boot to the main system screen and I can play all my games, access the store and download games. However, it will no longer boot into safe mode. Does anyone have any ideas on how to resolve?

I went through all the steps here and it still won't boot into safe mode: https://www.playstation.com/en-nz/get-help/help-library/system---hardware/power---system-stability/issues-accessing-ps4-safe-mode/

Damn thing is running pretty crappy and I was hope to defrag the drive, but can't do that without safe mode.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 08, 2019, 09:49:31 PM
Have you tried cleaning it and/or unplugging it and leaving it unplugged for a while (more than the 20 minutes listed on the Sony page)?

Also you should back up your saves onto a USB stick/drive if you haven't already.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PS4/comments/6sdpwi/my_ps4_wont_go_into_safe_mode/
https://www.reddit.com/r/PS4/comments/8hkvzr/ps4_beeps_once_flashes_blue_for_a_second_and/
https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/View/225366/PS4+beeps+once+then+turns+off


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on April 08, 2019, 10:03:07 PM
Thanks - everything is backed up into PS+ cloud luckily. Thanks for the advice, I'll leave it overnight unplugged and see if it helps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on April 09, 2019, 05:56:16 PM
Got it working. The fix? Dropped it ~3 inches off the ground onto a yoga mat. Booted into safe mode on the first try and I could defrag, working like a champ now. I'm guessing chip creep of some sort then?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 09, 2019, 07:19:22 PM
More like it needs cleaning -- it's very rare for chips to be socketed without also being latched somehow these days.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 12, 2019, 09:55:56 AM
Dropping three inches onto a mat was how we fixed hard disk stiction back in Ye Olde Days.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 16, 2019, 12:02:09 PM
How good would a 970GTX @ 1080p look on a 4k tv?

I'm hoping that even pushing 1080p from my old pc will be a slight improvement over the rear projection of the old DLP set?

Because after reading the reviews of the new 6 series of QLEDs, I decided to snag a 2018 model for less than BF pricing because I don't want to wait 2 years to get one (and hope Samsung improves the line for 2020). The 2019 sets still look decent, but overall it seems (for the 6 series) the 2018 sets are better quality.

But there goes the fun budget for this year, hah. Ended up getting an 83" set because I just can't see getting a /smaller/ tv, what would I call it? Certainly not George.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MisterNoisy on April 17, 2019, 04:20:42 PM
How good would a 970GTX @ 1080p look on a 4k tv?

I'm hoping that even pushing 1080p from my old pc will be a slight improvement over the rear projection of the old DLP set?

Because after reading the reviews of the new 6 series of QLEDs, I decided to snag a 2018 model for less than BF pricing because I don't want to wait 2 years to get one (and hope Samsung improves the line for 2020). The 2019 sets still look decent, but overall it seems (for the 6 series) the 2018 sets are better quality.

But there goes the fun budget for this year, hah. Ended up getting an 83" set because I just can't see getting a /smaller/ tv, what would I call it? Certainly not George.

At TV viewing distances, I'd wager you'll be fine.  My brother was using a 40" 4K set as his monitor (at typical monitor distance) in 1080p for games with a 1060 and didn't have any complaints.  

That said, I sent him my 1070 so that he could either push the resolution to 1440p (or 4K in less demanding stuff) or crank everything to ultra at 1080.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 23, 2019, 04:18:52 AM
Not totally comparable, but I have a regular projector that is 1080p that I have run with a 970 in the past....I now have a 1080 instead, but it makes almost no difference at 1080p.

And I have a 65" regular 4k LED that I use primarily as a computer monitor.

Now, while rear projection would probably mean better quality (because of the smaller screen size and therefore increased pixel density) than my regular projector.........virtually any LED technology of this generation is going to look WAAAAAAY better.  1080p on a 4k screen looks glorious for almost everything.  One of Samsung QLEDs is probably going to go even beyond that.  It isn't like before, where showing SD signals on an HD tv would just make the SD look even shittier.

I still use the project for most TV and Movie viewing.  But that is because of screen size, not quality.  The color and details are never as good.

Edit:  to add a bit of reference, that new Sekiro game....looks pretty nice in 1080p on the projector.  Looks great in 1080p on the 4K LED.  Looks...maybe a little better in 4K on the 4K LED.  In other words, looks great either way on the LED, and far better than the projector.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 23, 2019, 06:40:55 AM
Yeah, I've been pleasantly surprised with cable content. I expected that to be a wash, but it's improved remarkably (in that the fiancee remarked on it and she never notices stuff like that). I was really leery of a seeming sidegrade (since I'm primarily using 1080p content), but yeah, the pixel density and direct picture (vs rear proj) makes a huge difference. I hadn't realized the amount of screen sag I'd been getting on the ancient Mitsu set! And for the first time since 2003 it's nice to not have to deal with overscan and setting up custom resolutions.

For PC stuff, 4k looks pretty sketchy. Civ V keeps trying to load into a tiny corner box, lots of games don't scale text/UI. Windows itself is great, scales nicely. I'll keep it at 1080 for most stuff on PC. I could see a gpu benefitting the games that already struggled, GTA V in particular. PC graphics are so much nicer than PS4 but sluggish, the PS4 version runs smooth but the reduction in fidelity and more importantly, density and variety of cars, npcs, etc, is a huge bummer.

The PS4 has (of course) been a lot smoother, overall. Spider-man is smooth af in 4k so far, RDR2 less so. Madden stutters enough that I set the PS4 to 1080p before launching. Luckily, the set preserves settings not just per input, but per source resolution per input.

The only gripes I have are lack of full array backlight and the settings are a bit gimped on the lower end sets in the line. I'm not one to get hung up on stuff like that, though, since I don't fancy paying $20k for a tv to deal with it...


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 23, 2019, 07:52:26 AM
Yeah, that 970 will probably only do older shit in 4K, and then the UI scaling will be a coin toss.

Another thing I learned recently, to a small amount of dismay, is that you may need to beware of routing through a surround receiver.  I was doing that for a while, but once I finally got the itch to do some 4K gaming on the LED TV, I started noticing problems.  There were strange things that made me think something was clocked too high and possibly overheating, but that clearly was not the case, temps were low on everything.  Going direct from the PC to the TV solved the problem instantly, so it is all but certain that my surround receiver - which is a fairly high end Pioneer Elite, but about 5 years old - cannot really do 4K pass-through.  I think it will do low intensive shit, but trying things like GTA5 and Sekiro in 4K made everything take a dump.  Too many bits and bytes, methinks.  So only pass the video through a receiver if you know it is certified 4K.  I was surprised this was an issue, I just assumed as a passthrough it was not going to be a potential factor.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 23, 2019, 09:59:04 AM
My receiver has 3 optical inputs and zero hdmi  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 23, 2019, 10:22:29 AM
So, from the 90s then  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 23, 2019, 11:57:35 AM
So, from the 90s then  :awesome_for_real:
Might've been 2001.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 23, 2019, 10:53:34 PM
My subwoofer is from....94?  It is connected via RCA plug  :why_so_serious:  Sometimes the old shit is the good shit.  I will part with it the day it burns up.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 24, 2019, 08:29:11 AM
Do they have a new connector for subs? Mine is maybe 5 years old (the board on my 18yr old one went) and connects with an RCA.

I do need some solid stereo speakers once the budget recovers a bit. Never really got around to adding them, since I don't listen to much music through the system. But I do play Rocksmith, so it would be nice to have some better sound than my old L/R set from the surround kit (which are actually decent, super beefy magnets in them).

I've looked a couple times over the years, but haven't found a good combination of sound and not massive and normal living room friendly (I don't live in a spaceship!).

Now that I'm going to wall mount the tv, I'll also probably look at some new surrounds to put in the walls. Used to move the tv around a bit, so needed to move speakers, previously.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 24, 2019, 02:46:50 PM
If it is a powered subwoofer, it will have an RCA in as the frequencies that subs handle are non-directional and thus are mono.

If your sub is that old, you should make sure that the ring around the cone has not decayed. If it has, you can take it to a stereo repair shop and get it re-coned for less than 100 bucks (happened to me, my sub was about 10-15 years old when I took it in to be repaired.)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 24, 2019, 10:40:37 PM
Yeah, that makes sense now that I think about it.  My old sub is so awesome that I haven't even looked at any others since I bought it several decades ago, so they probably are all RCA or wired leads for connections for all I know.  It also appears to still be in perfect condition still, though I imagine at some point the electronics are going to take a shit on me.  That will be a sad, sad day.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 25, 2019, 07:02:04 AM
The fail point for just about any modern version of older technology is the circuit board.

That's why most of my musical gear is point to point unless it was invented after 1980 (DSPs, digital recorders).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on April 25, 2019, 07:59:48 AM
Not really sure if this goes here or the music thread but since it's currently on topic I'll put it here.  

Anyone have any advice on choosing a stereo receiver?  My living room has built in speakers and I'd like to take advantage of it.  The price ranges on receivers is so broad I'm a little unsure what I should even be looking at.  My wife bought me a cheap-ish Panasonic receiver a number of years ago and it was absolute garbage and was totally broken within a year and a half, so I'd like to get something at least a little better this time.  I won't need to buy speakers but I will need a sub.

I'd only need 5.1 support.  I'm not an audiophile.  A radio tuner is fine but most of my music would be either via Bluetooth or WiFi.  Other than that I'd pretty much just be hooking up a TV and an Apple TV (or similar device).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 25, 2019, 09:28:50 AM
7.1 is mostly just a.....unnecessary extra.  I have it, but few apps and software actually support it, and even when they do the content usually does not take advantage of it anyway.  And even in the event the stars align....it does not really blow you away.  5.1 is required, but 7.1 is kinda meh.

I usually buy middle range new stuff.  Technics, Sony, Panasonic.  It has all been pretty decent.  The Pioneer Elite I mentioned a few posts ago, I bought it use (about 2 years old at the time) for about a third of the original price.  Ended up being cheaper than a mid-range receiver and it is WAAAAAAAAAAAY better.  Holy shit.  I thought it would mostly be better from a features POV, and it is that, but the sound is dramatically better.  Also very powerful.  I feel like I got a steal.  So if you are willing to take the risk, that is totally what I would do.  I will probably never buy a new receiver ever again, just buy the leftovers of rich people who have to have the latest and greatest.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on April 25, 2019, 11:25:13 AM
I did notice, in the email pushes I'm getting after buying my tv, that there seem to be "4k" receivers on the market. I'm sure there's a lot of marketing hype, but I wonder if they update the HDMI subsystems to handle the higher bandwidth needs were talking about earlier? I'm not in the market, but if you're going to push your hdmi through the receiver, it's worth looking into.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 25, 2019, 03:49:48 PM
I did notice, in the email pushes I'm getting after buying my tv, that there seem to be "4k" receivers on the market. I'm sure there's a lot of marketing hype, but I wonder if they update the HDMI subsystems to handle the higher bandwidth needs were talking about earlier? I'm not in the market, but if you're going to push your hdmi through the receiver, it's worth looking into.

If they are marketing it as "4k" then it means their HDMI ports and switching circuitry are capable of handling the necessary bandwidth, mostly.

As far as receivers go, I have been pretty happy with the Pioneer one I bought on Newegg about 10 years ago now for like $225 bucks. Which surprised me as I usually was not a fan of their stuff back when I was an AV nerd. It has I think 5 HDMI inputs that lets me switch between a number of different devices without fucking with my TV. As per above, mine was marketed as "3D 1080P" if that tells you what was the AV fad of the day at the time.

The most important thing is to make sure that whatever you get, that it has a powerful enough amplifier. Contrary to what people think "makes sense", more speakers are blown from being driven by an under-powered amplifier than one too big. Of course, pretty much anything on the market now is going to have enough oomph.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 25, 2019, 11:14:28 PM
Yeah, a 4k stamp would mean they have certified the bandwidth of the HDMI.  I used to think this was bullshit, but a few years back when we started getting into monitor resolutions beyond 1080p, it became clear that older HDMI versions wouldn't cut it any longer (it would throttle, for example, the refresh rate).  So yeah, it matters.  My brain fart was more due to thinking that it made no difference if it was just a "pass through", but that is me being a retard.....my old receiver did pass through, not the new one.  The Pioneer Elite is actually processing, so it definitely would need to meet the 4k standard, which it doesn't.

No big deal, I have other options.  But if I were in the market for a new receiver, it might be a consideration.  The only reason I have this problem in the first place is because of the retarded decision of video card manufactures to cut down the number of HDMI outputs in favor of Display Port outputs.  I would bet my left testicle that HDMI is still vastly more common as an interface, so why anyone would put 1 HDMI out and 3 Display Port outs on a video card is beyond me.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on April 26, 2019, 05:26:59 AM
Displayport is royalty free, hdmi costs $10kUSD/year, plus $0.04-$0.15 per connector.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 26, 2019, 09:04:41 AM
No shit?  The more you know....

Still, would have been nice if, you know, DP had more of a presence before they started such a dramatic shift away from HDMI.  And the HDMI is still there, so they are not saving much.  15 cents on a card that cost me 800 bucks.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on April 29, 2019, 06:07:32 AM
I bought a few cables on amazon that were DP on one end and HDMI on the other for like $8.  They seem to work great, though I'm not doing 4k atm, so I can't vouch that they will work there.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on April 30, 2019, 02:54:47 AM
I am pretty sure they will work as long as the HDMI cable has the right level of cert.  And I actually ordered one of those a couple months ago, but it got lost during the shipment.  Probably because of Brexit (it was Amazon UK).  So now I am reminded to order another.  Might go with German Amazon this time.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on June 10, 2019, 10:11:22 AM
Anyone done cablecard on Charter (I'm on Spectrum, which is Charter's Time Warner region)?

Getting a tivo bolt 1TB in tomorrow, just wondering what to look out for that might trip me up (other than cable tech support). I'm also going to run an RG6 line, as I think I have RG59 or w/e in the attic.

When I picked up the cablecard the dude gave me a tuning adapter, because they have SDV on our network.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on June 10, 2019, 10:44:28 AM
I haven't used mine in a while and mine is with Comcast but pairing it can be a bit fiddly so you'll need to be patient with that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 22, 2019, 12:26:20 PM
Anyone have experience with setting up a Nest thermostat in multiple AC unit situation (3 thermostats 2 AC units)? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 31, 2019, 10:55:31 AM
How about some of the newer mesh based whole home wifi equipment, anyone have some preferences here?  I was thinking of getting a Netgear Orbi (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01K4CZOBS/) but Amazon seems to have a fuckton of refurbs so that scares me...

edit - I do see that they have had some problematic updates in the past which may have been a result of some refurb fodder and the main reason I am leaning towards the Orbi are the 4 ethernet ports per unit.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 31, 2019, 11:46:40 AM
Those things are huge. If that doesn't bother you it seems like a good choice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 31, 2019, 11:52:15 AM
Those things are huge.

Originally I was looking at the AmpliFi HD (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01L9O08PW/) which seems much more svelte but then it occured to me how much I dislike typing in wifi passwords on consoles, smart TV's and other devices that do not have a decent keyboard.  Shit I may even wire one to my desktop just to ditch the wifi manager.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on July 31, 2019, 12:05:14 PM
i got google wifi thing and it's fucking amazing - the pack of 3 completely blankets all 4 floors, the garage, both patios and like 20 feet outside


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on July 31, 2019, 12:16:14 PM
I looked into Google WiFi as well but a few minor items (ac1200, lack of extra ports) swayed me away from it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on August 01, 2019, 09:23:24 AM
I also have Google WiFi and love it.  It killed every dead space in the house that I had with the expensive non-mesh router + extender combo.  Only complaint is no USB port for Network storage.  The App is great too.  It might be annoying if you're a network nerd that wants to super engineer your home network.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 13, 2019, 08:58:05 AM
Alrighty, completed setup of the Netgear Orbi and so far it works amazing, hopefully it doesn't melt itself to a slow death or get broken by the automatic updates.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 13, 2019, 01:25:23 PM
It occurred to me that Google Wifi would be a great solution to the lakehouse wifi problems we have.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on August 17, 2019, 10:14:41 PM
It occurred to me that Google Wifi would be a great solution to the lakehouse wifi problems we have.
#1percentproblems


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 19, 2019, 10:37:19 AM
So I inherited a partial home theater setup in the new house, there are 4 speakers in the walls (looks like it is wired for 7.1 though), a 1080p projector mounted to the ceiling and a nice 12' screen.  I had Spectrum drop in a cable box and the picture is good, to temporarily get sound I just plugged some computer speakers into the cable box.  I am now ready to work on a more permanent solution and the last receiver I bought was in 1989.  I do not want to spend a ton of money, I want something easy to use and doesn't require the volume cranked to 11 to hear dialog, I also am planning on upgrading the projector to a 4k benq when the lamp goes out, so thinking I should get something that will support 4k.  Currently looking at what seem to be some popular options on Amazon:

Yamaha RX-V385 5.1-Channel 4K Ultra HD AV Receiver with Bluetooth (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07BNXXJKB/)

Sony STRDH590 5.2 multi-channel 4k HDR AV Receiver with Bluetooth (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B078WG7HZY/)

I will also need a center channel speaker and a subwoofer.

Also, anyone have experience with Spectrum Cable + a Samsung Smart TV.  I can't seem to figure out how to get 1 remote to do everything (or even just handle all TV functions).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 19, 2019, 11:30:24 AM
Haha goddamned Spectrum.

I was at 3 remotes with my Spectrum DVR, Mitsu tv and Panasonic receiver. Now I'm up to 4 remotes with the tivo and Sammy smart tv.

Tivo as main remote
Sammy for source selection
Receiver remote for source selection
My old Spectrum DVR remote because the power button on my receiver remote is broken (it's 20 years old, so...).


Yeah. Fiancee is even less happy than me. I almost bought a new receiver just to drop the 4th remote.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 19, 2019, 01:31:56 PM
Haha goddamned Spectrum.

I was at 3 remotes with my Spectrum DVR, Mitsu tv and Panasonic receiver. Now I'm up to 4 remotes with the tivo and Sammy smart tv.

Tivo as main remote
Sammy for source selection
Receiver remote for source selection
My old Spectrum DVR remote because the power button on my receiver remote is broken (it's 20 years old, so...).


Yeah. Fiancee is even less happy than me. I almost bought a new receiver just to drop the 4th remote.

I moved over to AT&T/uverse when the Time Warner buyout was happening not really dissatisfied but wanted a new subscriber rate, now 2 years later I sign up with spectrum for the same reasons and am like holy fuck I want AT&T back.

edit - Also is there some special test you need to pass before they determine you are a big enough moron to design UX for TV menu's?  HBO app sucks, Spectrum channel guide sucks, Starz app sucks, showtime app sucks, where do they effing find these people?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on August 20, 2019, 09:18:10 PM
edit - Also is there some special test you need to pass before they determine you are a big enough moron to design UX for TV menu's?  HBO app sucks, Spectrum channel guide sucks, Starz app sucks, showtime app sucks, where do they effing find these people?
Patents. Everything relating to intuitive DVR/Smart TV UX is covered by patents, and working around them makes for fuck-awful messes.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on August 21, 2019, 10:49:37 AM
I want to see the patent that covers hitting the channel guide button with the channel guide already open will close it.  Or the one covering caching the channel guide info locally so it doesn't take 5 seconds to open up every time or maybe the one that covers being able to scroll back to see programming that has already happened.  All of these features existed in my channel guide 5 years ago but are mysteriously not present in the latest and greatest, maybe it is as you say and the first creator of a channel guide patented everything and now we are left with a screen full of suckage.  If I found out someone patented pagination for long lists and is holding it hostage I will die a little inside, no mr on demand movie list i do not want to scroll through your list of 740 movies and shit that starts with the word "The" does not get filed alphabetically under T.

These are all things that happen when the idiot child of a 1%er figures out how to set the clock on the microwave so his parents get him a computer job.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 22, 2019, 10:11:21 AM
Headsets again. I've been on the $20 bandwagon for about a year or two since they all seem to degrade after a while, however it is probably time to do another discovery on more robust options. This is for work but would apply to gaming as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 22, 2019, 11:12:58 AM
Do you want over the ear, on the ear or in the ear? Open or close backed? Wireless or wired?

Edit: oh you said headsets. How good a mic do you need?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 22, 2019, 11:55:55 AM
Over the ear is best for me. Do not need ANC.
As for mics, I don't think it needs to be high quality but something that doesn't slide across my shirt front while unmuted would be great. This is probably the main gripe I have with the $20 throwaways.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on August 22, 2019, 12:21:17 PM
I've been using the no longer sold Logitech G930 (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003VANOFY). over the ear, closed back headset, for almost 7 years now for my work headset needs (Zoom, Skype, etc.). Uses an USB wireless stick for connectively with decent range (can wander around the house a bit). Works transparently with both Mac and Windows. Mic quality is only so-so but it's better than other co-workers' headset mics so I haven't bothered to upgrade. Had to replace the pads at the beginning of this year cause they had fallen apart (but you can get replacements which is nice). The mic can be muted by moving the boom up and the switch handles that seems to be wearing out finally as sometimes when the boom is all the way down to unmuted it's still muted (moving up and down will fix that). But 7 years is reasonable amount of time to last.

The replacement models are the G935 (https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B07MP4HT95) or the G933 (https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B0148NPJ78). Haven't tried either so I don't how they compare to mine.

Logitech also makes non-gaming headsets if you want something that doesn't look so "gamer".

https://www.logitechg.com/en-us/products/gaming-audio.html

https://www.logitech.com/en-us/headsets


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 22, 2019, 01:25:11 PM
It's super annoying I can't use their wireless USB dongle on my xbox. Why do I have to be tethered to my controller with a 3.5mm?  :dead_horse:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on August 22, 2019, 04:18:36 PM
I bought a Corsair HS70 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07BR3RWBP/ref=twister_B07QBVKZD6?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1) a few weeks ago and the little I have used them they are surprisingly comfy. Not sure how great the audio quality is for VOIP applications but they don't crush my ears and they sound pretty good. They also don't look that much unlike a pair of normal can headphones. No RGB madness or anything like that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 22, 2019, 05:40:03 PM
It's super annoying I can't use their wireless USB dongle on my xbox. Why do I have to be tethered to my controller with a 3.5mm?  :dead_horse:

It's interesting you post this. I don't have a Xbox One, but for the 360 there was a sweet MS-branded earpiece that was fully wireless. I'd give a left nut to get one of these for the PS4, and I guess there isn't one for the Xbox either.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 23, 2019, 06:41:24 AM
I was mildly annoyed to learn that though the PS4pro supports bluetooth, it's for input devices, not output.   :oh_i_see:

So I can't use my jabras iems, which have a mic and everything. Blah.

And I have to plug my Senn cans into the controller? What kind of dystopian crap is this? :uhrr:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Viin on August 23, 2019, 07:23:13 AM
It's super annoying I can't use their wireless USB dongle on my xbox. Why do I have to be tethered to my controller with a 3.5mm?  :dead_horse:

It's interesting you post this. I don't have a Xbox One, but for the 360 there was a sweet MS-branded earpiece that was fully wireless. I'd give a left nut to get one of these for the PS4, and I guess there isn't one for the Xbox either.

As far as I know, the only MSFT supported "wireless" option is plugging in to the Xbox controller. Which, honestly, is pretty ingenious and gets everyone connected using cheap 3.5mm headsets. But I don't like the cord constantly being in my lap. The only wireless options I know of require a 'base station' that plugs in to the Xbox's digital optical audio out, and there's not many options to pick from. Here's an example of a more premium version: https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B01G3WBCQY


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 23, 2019, 10:05:31 AM
The item I was referencing: https://support.xbox.com/en-US/xbox-360/accessories/set-up-wireless-headset


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on August 23, 2019, 10:23:10 AM
I have a pair of  Steelseries Arctis 7 (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07FZVXS8H/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_U_y.byDbC0P2RDH). Solid mic. Works perfectly with the PC and PS4. Just have to plug in this dongle/receiver thing. Really long charge life. Not terribly light, but pretty comfortable.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on August 23, 2019, 11:09:05 AM
Nice!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on August 28, 2019, 11:47:50 PM
Have the same headset.  Very high quality.  The SteelSeries software on the PC also really makes it come alive.  Which makes me suspect it is a bit less good on a PS4, but even so....great headset.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Shannow on October 20, 2019, 05:12:30 PM
Need a new home laptop methinks. Nothing fancy, just be able to run some shitty Steam games, (no FPS stuff) and stream  shit. I'm poor atm so something under 1000.'

Suggestions?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 20, 2019, 05:35:11 PM
Go over to your local Micro Center and get this:

https://www.microcenter.com/product/606146/asus-tuf-fx505du-mb53-156-gaming-laptop-computer---black

Only thing that's not so great about the config is the 8 GB RAM but you can upgrade it yourself whenever.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on October 24, 2019, 07:13:34 PM
As I recall, Shannow is in Ireland, so Micro Centers may be thin on the ground.

Newegg has this, looks decent:

https://www.newegg.com/global/ie-en/obsidian-black-acer-aspire-7-a717-72g-700j-gaming-entertainment/p/N82E16834316435 (https://www.newegg.com/global/ie-en/obsidian-black-acer-aspire-7-a717-72g-700j-gaming-entertainment/p/N82E16834316435)

Just barely makes your budget cap, only one with 16GB that does.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on October 25, 2019, 05:10:16 AM
No, Shannow is in the Boston area.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on October 27, 2019, 11:08:55 PM
A family member wants to buy a gaming laptop, so naturally, they've asked me for advice. Price/performance, blabla.

I found this thing on sale (for a couple more days)
https://www.dell.com/en-au/shop/gaming-and-games/alienware-m17-gaming-laptop/spd/alienware-m17-laptop/awm17d10au?mkwid=sNa3LyxeO&pcrid=203090359674&pkw=&pmt=&pdv=c&ven1=sNa3LyxeO~203090359674~9011547612~c&ven2=~&dgc=st&dgseg=dhs&acd=10589238119234140&st=&cid=238119&lid=23414&ven3=110905154226882195&configurationid=f7b97e84-5032-4d3f-92f4-7a1d331a1f83

Seems good to me, but not a lot of RAM. Seems like DDR4 SODIMM 2666 is the type to use? Would either of these be good for bumping it up to 16gb? And if so, what's the practical difference between them? Both descriptions bang on about NUCs, so I figure best to check in here with the people who know WTF is going on...

https://www.centrecom.com.au/gskill-ripjaws-16gb-2666mhz-ddr4-sodimm-ram
https://www.centrecom.com.au/gskill-16gb-f4-2666c19s-16grs-ddr4-2666mhz-sodimm-ram

Are they both shit? Better option?
https://www.centrecom.com.au/notebook-ram?orderby=10&specs=466,236,237,238,248

https://www.amazon.com.au/s?k=SODIMM+DDR4+2666&ref=nb_sb_noss_2


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 28, 2019, 12:25:52 AM
A family member wants to buy a gaming laptop, so naturally, they've asked me for advice. Price/performance, blabla.

I found this thing on sale (for a couple more days)
https://www.dell.com/en-au/shop/gaming-and-games/alienware-m17-gaming-laptop/spd/alienware-m17-laptop/awm17d10au?mkwid=sNa3LyxeO&pcrid=203090359674&pkw=&pmt=&pdv=c&ven1=sNa3LyxeO~203090359674~9011547612~c&ven2=~&dgc=st&dgseg=dhs&acd=10589238119234140&st=&cid=238119&lid=23414&ven3=110905154226882195&configurationid=f7b97e84-5032-4d3f-92f4-7a1d331a1f83
Despite being on sale that's not a very good configuration. This one is smaller and not on sale but the same price and is a better configuration (16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, same GPU):

https://www.dell.com/en-au/shop/gaming-and-games/new-alienware-m15-gaming-laptop/spd/alienware-m15-r2-laptop/awm15d72au

There are also non-Dell models that are cheaper for the same GPU performance (GTX 1660 Ti in this case).

Quote
Seems good to me, but not a lot of RAM. Seems like DDR4 SODIMM 2666 is the type to use? Would either of these be good for bumping it up to 16gb? And if so, what's the practical difference between them? Both descriptions bang on about NUCs, so I figure best to check in here with the people who know WTF is going on...

https://www.centrecom.com.au/gskill-ripjaws-16gb-2666mhz-ddr4-sodimm-ram
https://www.centrecom.com.au/gskill-16gb-f4-2666c19s-16grs-ddr4-2666mhz-sodimm-ram

Are they both shit? Better option?
https://www.centrecom.com.au/notebook-ram?orderby=10&specs=466,236,237,238,248

https://www.amazon.com.au/s?k=SODIMM+DDR4+2666&ref=nb_sb_noss_2
Yes you want DDR4 SODIMMs with a minimal speed of 2666. However it's better to get a matching pair of 8 GB SODIMMs so you get dual-channel memory rather than a single 16 GB.

The top G.Skill is actually the better one cause it's got faster timings (CL18 vs CL19) which is why it's more expensive if it wasn't on sale. But you still don't want that one cause it's not a dual-channel kit.

This one is 2x8 GB CL15: https://www.amazon.com.au/Kingston-Technology-2666MHz-HX426S15IB2K2-16/dp/B01N2VUOBJ

This one is 2x8 GB CL19: https://www.amazon.com.au/Crucial-PC4-21300-SODIMM-260-Pin-Memory/dp/B071KP8CGG


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on October 28, 2019, 01:08:00 AM
Despite being on sale that's not a very good configuration. This one is smaller and not on sale but the same price and is a better configuration (16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, same GPU):
https://www.dell.com/en-au/shop/gaming-and-games/new-alienware-m15-gaming-laptop/spd/alienware-m15-r2-laptop/awm15d72au

I'll mention it, but I think the larger screen was an important consideration for them.


Quote
There are also non-Dell models that are cheaper for the same GPU performance (GTX 1660 Ti in this case).

I guess the difficulty there is figuring out what's good and less good and hot garbage, and of course, the price/performance/brand quality. I know less about gaming laptops than gaming desktops.

Anything here in the AU$2-2700 range that you'd recommend? (probably 17". expanding the RAM as an option)
https://www.jbhifi.com.au/collections/gaming-laptops
https://www.centrecom.com.au/gaming-laptops
https://www.harveynorman.com.au/games-central/pc-gaming/gaming-laptop?dir=asc&order=price#toolbar-top

Quote
Yes you want DDR4 SODIMMs with a minimal speed of 2666. However it's better to get a matching pair of 8 GB SODIMMs so you get dual-channel memory rather than a single 16 GB.
The top G.Skill is actually the better one cause it's got faster timings (CL18 vs CL19) which is why it's more expensive if it wasn't on sale. But you still don't want that one cause it's not a dual-channel kit.

I was going to suggest that they get 2x of the 16gb ram ones for 32gb. Would they work for that?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 28, 2019, 12:13:19 PM
I guess the difficulty there is figuring out what's good and less good and hot garbage, and of course, the price/performance/brand quality. I know less about gaming laptops than gaming desktops.

Anything here in the AU$2-2700 range that you'd recommend? (probably 17". expanding the RAM as an option)
https://www.jbhifi.com.au/collections/gaming-laptops
https://www.centrecom.com.au/gaming-laptops
https://www.harveynorman.com.au/games-central/pc-gaming/gaming-laptop?dir=asc&order=price#toolbar-top
JB HIFI and Harvey Norman don't have anything good in that price range. On Centre Com these are good:

https://www.centrecom.com.au/gaming-laptops?orderby=10&specs=44
https://www.centrecom.com.au/asus-rog-strix-scar-iii-gl731gv-173-fhd-144hz-rtx-2060-i7-gaming-laptop
https://www.centrecom.com.au/msi-ge75-9se-297au-173fhd-rtx-2060-i7-laptop

Quote
I was going to suggest that they get 2x of the 16gb ram ones for 32gb. Would they work for that?
That's fine if you want 32 GB RAM but again it's better if you get a matched pair kit (2x16 GB) like this:

https://www.amazon.com.au/Crucial-16GBx2-PC4-21300-SODIMM-260-Pin/dp/B071H38422


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Azazel on October 28, 2019, 02:11:57 PM
Thanks a ton for this as well - I'll pass it all on. :)


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 12, 2019, 08:30:43 AM
The old Sharp Aquos is finally in need of replacement. It was a great TV for a long time (in TV years). A very quick tour of the intertubes shows a lot of manufacturers but I don't see Sharp come up on review sites. So, I turn to F13 to see if anyone here has any thoughts on TV manufacturers before I get too deep into researching.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 12, 2019, 09:43:51 AM
I've been happy with my Samsung QLED (2018 6 series), but I generally like Samsung stuff. Sony has some good sets and was my runner up when I was shopping around.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 12, 2019, 10:34:45 AM
Sony has that Sony-surcharge, though. Which is fine if it has the quality to warrant it.

I do see a lot of Samsung. Unsure about LG.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: rattran on November 12, 2019, 04:27:02 PM
My boss loves LG. He gets a new one about every 18 months when the previous dies. I've had good luck with Samsung, one I got from Circuit City a couple years before they bankrupted is still going strong.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 12, 2019, 04:30:59 PM
The old Sharp Aquos is finally in need of replacement. It was a great TV for a long time (in TV years). A very quick tour of the intertubes shows a lot of manufacturers but I don't see Sharp come up on review sites. So, I turn to F13 to see if anyone here has any thoughts on TV manufacturers before I get too deep into researching.
For OLED LG is the benchmark (LG makes pretty much everybody's OLED panels), for LED Samsung is the benchmark and Sony has both types and is competitive though you may pay a premium (less likely to have discounts).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 13, 2019, 06:03:04 AM
He gets a new one about every 18 months when the previous dies.

 :oh_i_see:

As for OLED, I need a 51" diagonal. This seems hard to find. Will probably end up with a LED.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 13, 2019, 07:46:20 AM
My level of care about black levels did not rise to the price difference of an OLED.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 13, 2019, 07:47:36 AM
He gets a new one about every 18 months when the previous dies.

 :oh_i_see:

As for OLED, I need a 51" diagonal. This seems hard to find. Will probably end up with a LED.

Well, you don't get to just state the size you want and they make one for you.  Also, the rule of thumb is always to get one size bigger than what you think.  Conveniently, that means you want a 55", which is also probably the sweet spot from a price POV as well.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 13, 2019, 08:34:54 AM
The TV must fit within a 48" x 32" space.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 13, 2019, 08:41:20 AM
Heh, a 55 inch is going to be very close to 48.  Maybe you could just shove it in there.  Or the real answer:  find more space, you caveman.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 13, 2019, 12:25:39 PM
I've got two TCL 4K, one 49 inch (which would definitely fit your space) and a 55 inch (which is apparently 1 inch too wide). The built-in Roku is pretty good (with both Wi-Fi and Ethernet). For $250-280, it's hard to go wrong.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 13, 2019, 04:03:31 PM
My biggest problem with Samsung is you can't install android apps, so if there isn't a Samsung version that is worth a crap you are stuck.  I do remember wanting something and being blocked by this but I can't remember what it was.  Pretty happy with my 2018 4k Samsung qled as well, in addition to the TV quality it is fairly decent looking when it is not being used (which for me is most of the time).  The other extremely annoying feature of Samsung Smart TV's is you can only pair a single Samsung remote to it and I would love to have two of them.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 14, 2019, 11:17:04 AM
I'm using a $250 TCL 4k right now as a work monitor. The pic quality is not great, in that the pixels are somewhat obvious. When plugged into a PS4, it looks less good than the Sharp Aquos. The forget-the-brand 4k at the office has a much better picture.

I don't need anything in this TV other than a TV since I already have a Roku, plus the various doohickeys such as the PS4. I just need a viewer into my PS4, Roku, etc. Maybe it is Samsung this round. Need to get cabinet measurements.

The Aquos I have is exactly 47.9 inches wide. I knew this day would come, but it is still sad.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 16, 2019, 11:28:40 AM
What you need to do is tear everything off the wall, drop in some AV surround sound and get a projector.  Anyone who doesn't think they "need" this has not experienced the current quality of a decent entry level setup.  Quit being a pussy and rip your 1990's era cabinetry out!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 17, 2019, 04:18:28 AM
As someone who uses a projector as a main display, I can only heartily second that idea.  And who has tv cabinets anymore anyway?  I bet it's teak.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 18, 2019, 07:50:07 AM
I have a 71" 4k in the basement already. I installed the sound system myself, with ceiling speakers and wires behind the drywall. That TV just hangs on the wall like a regular American's system.

As for projectors, a friend is an expert in the field and I could do that if I wanted to. But I already have a TV in the basement.

The cabinets are actually custom bookshelves. They stay. I'll put a fishtank in there before I tear them down.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 18, 2019, 09:22:00 AM
I'm considering putting a built-in wall of bookshelves around my new tv, since it has a lux mount and I doubt I'll go bigger than 82". I need so many more bookshelves but also the wall space for art. The struggle is real.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 18, 2019, 12:09:21 PM
The opening for the TV seemed way too large in 2002.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 19, 2019, 01:17:01 PM
Samsung's sets are on sale over at BB, the 55" range is 48.7" - 48.8" wide  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 20, 2019, 05:33:34 AM
Thanks for the tip. I got all excited about the Samsung UN55RU7100FXZA for $448 but I see it is 48.8" wide. Will keep looking.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: MahrinSkel on November 20, 2019, 10:17:48 AM
The problem you've got is that a 55" screen is just over 48" wide without any bezel, and there's a void between 50" and 55" screens: Literally nobody makes a 53" screen to put into a TV, which is what would give you a TV that would just fit the space.

--Dave


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 20, 2019, 11:27:19 AM
Another option could be putting in an articulating mount. Mine will pull out 2' from the wall. Then you could just let the back of the tv rest a bit proud of the cabinet.

Depending on the tv/bezel it could look cheesy, but it might also squeeze something bigger in.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 21, 2019, 05:35:05 AM
Or just mount a plywood box the same depth as it takes to make the front of a flat mount be where the front of the shelves are and attach it securely to the wall and the TV to it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 21, 2019, 06:13:56 AM
I like that idea better. Add a piano hinge and have a secret compartment behind the tv!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 21, 2019, 06:17:59 AM
The problem you've got is that a 55" screen is just over 48" wide without any bezel, and there's a void between 50" and 55" screens: Literally nobody makes a 53" screen to put into a TV, which is what would give you a TV that would just fit the space.

--Dave

That's exactly it. The current set is 51" diagonal.

The hunt continues, in between T-giving prep, Radar cluster rebuilds, jazz band pickup/dropoffs, regular housekeeping, etc. Also I accidentally two recruiters at the same time and am sort of confusing the roles. I'm either going to Peter Gibbons them or... well, probably full Gibbons.

Another option could be putting in an articulating mount.

You guys are going to think I'm trolling you. Just remember that I live orthogonally to the rest of the world.

There is no wall behind the TV.

If there was some sort of cantilevered mount which didn't need to be screwed down, that would work.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 21, 2019, 06:41:25 AM
Wait....are you my mother?  Because that sounds exactly like what my mother has.  I have always thought you reminded me too much of myself somehow.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 21, 2019, 08:01:54 AM
You guys are going to think I'm trolling you. Just remember that I live orthogonally to the rest of the world.

I mean, that'd kinda my whole jam, so yeah. I consider it a good thing, because the 'rest of the world' seems to be fucking nuts.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 21, 2019, 08:05:10 AM
Wait....are you my mother?  Because that sounds exactly like what my mother has.  I have always thought you reminded me too much of myself somehow.

Yes (to the last part). We are not special. We are the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 21, 2019, 04:38:34 PM
You guys are going to think I'm trolling you. Just remember that I live orthogonally to the rest of the world.

There is no wall behind the TV.

So you are saying you could set up a rear projection system and haven't done it? 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 21, 2019, 11:59:24 PM
The only solution here is that you obviously need to submit a detailed floorplan of your living space, complete with furniture layout and this "supposed" wall unit that only has a 48" opening and was probably constructed in the 1950s and possibly isn't even placed next to a wall.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 22, 2019, 06:45:43 AM
Let's Nerf the hell out of this bitch!


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 26, 2019, 07:15:40 AM
I have a wall that I could project onto but I went and hung a 71" TV on it like some Greatest Generation dumbass.

The Samsung QN55Q70RAFXZA is 48.4" wide and therefore a perfect fit. However now the Budget Monster has risen from the Swamp of No Profits. Back to looking at gaming laptops that can do some sort of VR helmet thingy. Will see what the prices are in Feb just before the Super Bowl.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 26, 2019, 09:21:41 AM
Dammit man, don’t buy a laptop for VR.  If you are going to dump that kind of cash on something, get something that will do the job.  And that you can upgrade. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 26, 2019, 09:26:16 AM
I have a wall that I could project onto but I went and hung a 71" TV on it like some Greatest Generation dumbass.

The Samsung QN55Q70RAFXZA is 48.4" wide and therefore a perfect fit. However now the Budget Monster has risen from the Swamp of No Profits. Back to looking at gaming laptops that can do some sort of VR helmet thingy. Will see what the prices are in Feb just before the Super Bowl.
Having watched Samsung prices from Black Friday through Superbowl and then model clearance....buy on BF. Great prices on the Sammies right now.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 26, 2019, 10:11:55 AM
My phone broke in Barcelona and I need to get a new one.

What do people recommend? Had a google pixel, it did everything I really need.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 26, 2019, 10:47:24 AM
iPhone 11 :awesome_for_real:

On the Android side I've really only used the Nexus/Pixel phones. I got a Pixel 3 at a good price ($549) during the Prime Day sale. That one is the last to have the unlimited original quality storage (through 1/31/2022) if that sort of thing matters to you. The Pixel 3 XL is currently on sale for $549 on Google's store:

https://store.google.com/us/config/pixel_3

The reviews for the Pixel 4 I've seen have all been a resounding "meh". It is on sale right now ($200 off, $599/$699), though, so if you want the latest now would be a good time to get one:

https://store.google.com/us/config/pixel_4

The Pixel 3a is not on sale through Google but it's still $200 cheaper than the on sale Pixel 4 ($399 vs $599) so that's an option depending on your budget.

https://store.google.com/us/product/pixel_3a


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 26, 2019, 11:38:48 AM
Finding anywhere to get the Pixel here seems a drag. I'm not keep on ordering online as I don't have a reliable postal address. Orange supposedly has it, but the one store I asked had no idea at all.

Samsung Galaxy S10e seems my next options - if i can navigate getting the phone "unlocked".

Don't think I can afford the iPhone.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 26, 2019, 03:09:10 PM
Dammit man, don’t buy a laptop for VR.

I'm not. I'm buying one to play (certain) games and it would be nice to get one that does VR. We are not the VR-one-percent.

The problem with buying the TV now is that I won't be able to buy the birthday-pushed-six-months-to-christmas present of a laptop (according to the Budget Monster). I don't really need that backlight.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 27, 2019, 12:37:04 AM
Well that's fine, then.  Just be aware it still has to be a powerhouse.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 27, 2019, 07:05:25 AM
Sure, if it says "VR Ready" on the NewEgg page.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 27, 2019, 08:22:10 AM
I am mentally punching you through my screen right now.  Did you feel it?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 27, 2019, 12:04:57 PM
No, but it looked very real.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 27, 2019, 03:27:48 PM
Broken phone screen, how can I get my picture and such off it? My google-fu says I'm out of luck and will need professional help, at best?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 27, 2019, 10:52:56 PM
No, but it looked very real.

Hopefully you also noticed it was in surround sound.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rendakor on November 28, 2019, 04:45:11 AM
Broken phone screen, how can I get my picture and such off it? My google-fu says I'm out of luck and will need professional help, at best?
What happens when you hook it up to your PC?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on November 28, 2019, 09:30:25 AM
Broken phone screen, how can I get my picture and such off it? My google-fu says I'm out of luck and will need professional help, at best?
What happens when you hook it up to your PC?

Nada, as I can't use the screen to authorise media access.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 28, 2019, 09:42:29 AM
You cannot just replace the screen?  Wouldn’t you want to be doing that anyway?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 02, 2019, 07:26:36 AM
Broken phone screen, how can I get my picture and such off it? My google-fu says I'm out of luck and will need professional help, at best?

I'd take it to one of those repair guys.

I got the 48.4" wide TV and realized what I already knew: I don't have any right-angles in my house. So, after some cursing I have it in there but slightly turned to the right. It does help with the glare, though, and I can't see it from the sofa.

The thing I'm really having trouble getting used to are BLACK blacks. It all just feels off right now in terms of brightness and contrast. Starting off in Game Mode and will see if I can (or want to) ease into another mode.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 02, 2019, 08:57:24 AM
Pushed contrast has been a thing for a while now. I hate it in games, tbh.

The hardest thing about my new set is getting used to how stupidly bright the thing is. I'm running it as low as I can before it starts looking brown, I think it's at 20 backlight, ffs.

Is it a generational thing with people over-exposed to screens? I was thinking this because of not just the inability to get a decent brightness level on the set but also the fact that car manufacturers are making their lights as bright as reflected sunlight.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on December 02, 2019, 11:08:31 AM
Am I wrong that your last set was rear projection?  Projector are not bright generally speaking, and rear projection even less so...so modern flatscreens probably seem crazy bright by comparison.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on December 02, 2019, 11:14:58 AM
Yes, though it had a 185 watt bulb and I used to crank the brightness on it. I miss the DLP set. The new set is beautiful but nowhere near as practical. Weighs too much, fragile af, had to wall mount it so now I can't rearrange my living room seasonally. I'll probably go with a projector next time, and just build two mounts for it into the ceiling to accommodate summer and winter modes.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on February 29, 2020, 04:48:33 PM
Upgrading our TV, the current one is a bit long in the tooth. Any advice on this model, the Samsung Q70? Price point is in our range and looking at the TVs at Best Buy and it just felt like it had the best picture. PS4, hockey, football, occasional Switch and Netflix. We have a simple sound bar. 55" version is the largest we can put in our space.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07N4L5PKL?tag=georiot-us-default-20&th=1&psc=1&ascsubtag=trd-4617855090491299000-20


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Druzil on March 02, 2020, 05:54:27 AM
I just bought a 55" Q80 about a month ago and it's been great so far.  The only reason I went with the Q80 over the Q70 was the wider viewing angle which made sense for the room we were putting it in.  Otherwise I'd have bought the Q70.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 02, 2020, 07:41:32 AM
My Samsung Q55 is great. Still haven't tweaked the brightness perfectly, but it's about 95% OK so I haven't bothered.

Don't configure the network or you'll end up with tons of uninstallable cruft.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 02, 2020, 09:54:20 AM
I'm still digging my 2018 6-tier Samsung QLED. There's a little banding from the backlight on off-angles, but I normally sit pretty far to one side and it's rarely noticeable (only on a full panel white screen). It's likely worse on my set because it's so huge (82" or w/e).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 08, 2020, 09:45:10 PM
It's been so long not upgrading I have no idea what is going on. We bought a 65" Q70R on sale for under a grand - it's kinda too big for our room but whatever. Having trouble getting the image to look 'crisp' like the showroom floor.

Example: streaming NHLtv from the PS4 (not-pro) and the image looks kinda blurry. I *think* I have set up the image options correctly, so maybe this is just a lower-quality stream? Or should we switch out to a Roku that supports 4k?

When I look at the PS4 options on the TV it says 1920x1080 60p, which is not 4k - so I'm guessing the stream or PS4 doesn't support that. If anyone has a guide on this stuff without getting too lost in the weeds, I would appreciate it.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 08, 2020, 11:35:07 PM
Yeah, your PS4 won't do 4K.  On the other hand, that doesn't necessarily mean it should be "blurry".  And yeah, you could also have a shitty stream.

Kinda hard to give specific advice.  You cannot judge it fairly without a true 4K source of high quality.  That said, never expect it to look as good as it does in the store.  They crank up the all the brightness and color settings to max, and then run some specific hi res stuff on a loop.  Unless you do the same, it won't look the same. 


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on March 08, 2020, 11:52:37 PM
Thanks - I kinda figured it’s hard to tell through description. After tinkering a bit, games on the PS4 look damn amazing, as does some Netflix content like Altered Carbon. Most tv streaming does not look great, so I’m guessing the content from the stream is the problem. The ps4 is on LAN at around 80MB consistently which should be decent enough for solid streaming.

I’ll just have to work out a better solution for sports if I can.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 09, 2020, 12:26:22 AM
Sounds like you have it working like it should, and anything that looks poor is just some combination of a low quality stream being displayed at a lower resolution than the screen's native resolution.  Would be my guess.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 06, 2020, 06:49:35 PM
Doing a basic tech review of our household needs. For Password Managers, is 1Password still decent? I need something simple for the family - KeePass won't cut it there, too archaic for them to grasp.

What about email services? I'm trying to get away from Gmail, into something like ProtonMail or something less invasive. I'm ok with paying a bit for email.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on July 06, 2020, 07:36:52 PM
Yes 1Password is still good though they've changed their model to subscription-based.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on July 06, 2020, 11:14:46 PM
Somewhat random question:   Any Idea why my computer would suddenly just stop being able to play video in web browsers?

Like, I have had several times where I will be browsing video clips on Facebook or Imgur or checking out Youtube videos, and everything has been playing fine:  Videos play or auto play as you scroll through them and then suddenly, with out any rhyme or reason videos stop playing.  Like, completely unable to start a video, no matter what web broswer I switch to.  I usually use Firefox, but as soon as the issue starts it appears to affect any web-browser I use.  Firefox, IE, Chrome, video refuses to play on any of them: First frame of the video will load, it might cache the first few seconds, but the video NEVER plays, no matter what I do.  Closing and re-starting browsers has no effect. Opening new browsers has no effect.  Note: This ONLY affects web based video streaming.  Any video content played through a dedicated player such as downloaded TV episodes or digital movies play without issue.

So far, the only way I have managed to fix it once it starts happening is by rebooting my PC.  Any thoughts on what could be causing this phenomenon?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: tar on July 07, 2020, 01:32:37 AM
When in doubt, blame anti-virus. Which one do you use? Any appetite for changing it?

Also, does this affect any other devices or just the one PC? If it's just this one device that points to someting system local and a/v is probably the most likely culprit. Good place to start if nothing else.




Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on July 07, 2020, 10:12:33 PM
I use Panda AV as my free AV.
Not sure if it would be causing the issue, but I can always try turning it off next time the problem crops up and see if that helps.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on November 14, 2020, 10:23:04 AM
So, with the COVID quarantine ramping back up, We're trying to figure out a way to do video conference for Thanksgiving and Christmas.  The problem is that my in-laws don't even have wi-fi set up in their house.  We bought them a router a few years back, but my father-in-law unhooked it because he was worried about a neighbor "hacking" him.  Now, I can't travel across 3 states just to hook it back up.

Does anyone have a recommendation for a nationally franchised tech service?  Is there anything better than Geek Squad I can use to get in-home tech support for something this simple?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 14, 2020, 01:21:30 PM
Geek Squad is probably your best bet for that kind of thing.

That or see if there is a local shop with good ratings and call them for advice.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on November 14, 2020, 01:40:11 PM
Thanks!  I suspected as much, but it's good to have it confirmed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 14, 2020, 01:42:39 PM
So, with the COVID quarantine ramping back up, We're trying to figure out a way to do video conference for Thanksgiving and Christmas.  The problem is that my in-laws don't even have wi-fi set up in their house.  We bought them a router a few years back, but my father-in-law unhooked it because he was worried about a neighbor "hacking" him.  Now, I can't travel across 3 states just to hook it back up.
Do they not have a cellular phone with data service?

Quote
Does anyone have a recommendation for a nationally franchised tech service?  Is there anything better than Geek Squad I can use to get in-home tech support for something this simple?
If your father-in-law is paranoid about people spying on him Geed Squad is a horrible choice since they have spied on customers for the FBI and if he happens to Google that he's probably going to be pissed if you send them over to their place.

A couple of other options:

* See if the Internet service provider (Comcast, AT&T, etc.) will do installations for 3rd-party routers

* Dell has a home installation service though I have no idea how good or expensive they are and if they'll just hook up a router to a non-Dell PC


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on November 14, 2020, 03:07:15 PM
Do they not have a cellular phone with data service?

No, they have an old Nokia-style phone. Texts are frightening occurrences. 

If your father-in-law is paranoid about people spying on him Geed Squad is a horrible choice since they have spied on customers for the FBI and if he happens to Google that he's probably going to be pissed if you send them over to their place.

A couple of other options:

* See if the Internet service provider (Comcast, AT&T, etc.) will do installations for 3rd-party routers

* Dell has a home installation service though I have no idea how good or expensive they are and if they'll just hook up a router to a non-Dell PC

Didn't know about GS snooping like that.  Good to know.
Their internet is AT&T, and my wife just confirmed it's DSL, so this whole thing may be a bust due to connection speeds.
But I appreciate the suggestions.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on November 14, 2020, 04:24:59 PM
Going out on a limb here, but someone with a nokia phone who can be just fine with no wifi is probably ok not dealing with technobullshit for the holidays.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Father mike on November 15, 2020, 10:00:29 AM
Nope.  It's going to be a nightmare.  But my wife has decided that holiday video conferences are happening, so I'm just strapping in for the ride.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on November 15, 2020, 12:00:21 PM
Buy them a cheap smart phone with a pre-paid SIM, install zoom on it, and have them use that.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on November 16, 2020, 03:11:46 AM
Nope.  It's going to be a nightmare.  But my wife has decided that holiday video conferences are happening, so I'm just strapping in for the ride.

Seems the most entertaining way to do it would be to do nothing other than recommending the Geek Squad and standing back to watch the lulz unfold.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Draegan on November 18, 2020, 11:52:13 AM
Buy them a cheap smart phone with a pre-paid SIM, install zoom on it, and have them use that.

This is your best bet. Especially for someone not tech savvy. You can easily make sure they just know how to turn it on and plug it in.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on November 19, 2020, 07:17:30 PM
Lookng for some input re: Media Servers for streaming to PS4.

I have never used my PS4 as a streaming media platform for streaming from my PC before, but currently find myself taking an extended vacation with my folks at home due to the pandemic, and due to space constraints, plopping my PC in the room with the TV isn't really viable, so I decided I would setup my PS4 so I could stream stuff to it.

Any vets here have any input on Media Server options?  I considered just going with the basic Media Server that comes with Windows 10, but figured there must be at least a few decent freeware Media Server apps out there that would likely do the job better.  A cursory google search seems to give pretty good reviews for something called the Universal Media Serve, which has been maintained and improved since the days of the PS3, but I thought I might canvass the gang here for recommendations and input.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 19, 2020, 08:14:17 PM
Why not just try the Windows 10 DLNA server and see how that goes? Universal Media Server (which I haven't used) may in fact be the greatest thing since sliced bread but their front page and other docs are so out-of-date it's hard to tell if that's truly the case. Like, the PS4 is not even listed on the Supported Devices page (it is mentioned at the bottom of the front page). Projects in that sort of state often require a lot of futzing around to get working properly, though I have no idea if that's the case with UMS.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on November 21, 2020, 03:44:23 PM
So, the Win 10 media server seems to be fine, but now I have run into a new wrinkle.  A large swath of my media library (specifically video content) appears to have audio tracks that the PS4 is unable to play back.   I can find the file easy enough, and the video plays fine, but it throws me an error about being unable to process the audio.

Any idea if there is any stream casting type options that would work with the PS4?  Like, play content on my PC (so the pc does the Audio / Video processing) and just stream the result through the PS4 onto the TV?

If that isn't an option, it looks like hauling my PC into the living room might be my only option to watch a lot of this stuff.


Well, feel free to disregard this.  Turns out the issue is that the basic Win 10 DLNA server setup is basically just shit as a media server, and wasn't doing any kind of background transcoding or mixing of the files.   Decided to give the Universal Media Server app a spin for kicks, and it does everything fine.   It even properly identified the embedded subtitles in my copy of Kung-fu Hustle, which the Win10 system couldn't find.

Leave it to Microsoft to make something that works, but is functionally useless.......


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on February 26, 2021, 02:58:53 PM
Anyone else having issues with the latest Windows update?

2 days ago, Windows rolled out an update patch that was slightly more "serious" than their usual little tweak patches.   Since that update, I have had my computer Blue Screen of Death on me twice (Blue screen, error info collection notice, QR code in bottom left of screen I can scan if I feel like it), something that literally has not happened in several YEARS previous to this update.

Not sure if it is just a coincidence or not, but both times the crash happened, the only thing I was doing was scrolling through my facebook feed in Firefox.

I wrote the first occurrence off as something possibly weird with the actual patch process, as after I rebooted the OS did a small patch / update while rebooting, but this second BSOD how has me wondering.

Whats even stranger is that both reported error messages were different.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 26, 2021, 05:54:03 PM
You on Windows Insider or whatever they call it?

Because the last MS windows patch for normal people was released on Feb 9th.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on February 26, 2021, 08:43:02 PM
Not on insider that I am aware of.

All i know is that I had a windows update occur about 2 days ago (the update specifically warned me that it might take a little longer than normal because it was more than just a basic patch) and in the 2 or 3 days since the update I have had 2 BSOD crashes, which never happened to me before.

System info lists me as:

Edition   Windows 10 Pro
Version   20H2
Installed on   ‎2/‎25/‎2021 
OS build   19042.804
Experience   Windows Feature Experience Pack 120.2212.551.0

if any of that helps?
(assuming that Installed On date has something to do with the tiny patch/update the system processed after the first BSOD, as nothing else makes sense).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 26, 2021, 08:48:46 PM
How old is your CPU?

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/287469/win10-20h2-bsod-when-complicated-applications-are.html


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on February 26, 2021, 09:47:05 PM
its an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz.

Would that count as "4th generation or older"?

Judging by the info submitted in that question, it seems like lots of active "panels" (I assume this means active apps or instances of programs) can trigger the BSOD.  I confess that I do like to run Firefox with a buttload of tabs open, and both crashes usually occurred when browsing facebook (which might "queue up" several discrete background actions in connection with starting / pausing every video i scroll by), so maybe it's related?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on February 26, 2021, 09:56:22 PM
No that's 6th gen Skylake so may not be the same issue.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on February 26, 2021, 11:34:31 PM
Well, just had my 3rd BSOD.

the Stop Code was : SYSTEM_SERVICE_EXCEPTION (which I believe was also the stop code for the first one).
and once again, it happened while browsing facebook.  This is starting to get irritating.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on February 27, 2021, 01:32:22 AM
I also BSODed yesterday for the first time in recent memory.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on February 27, 2021, 07:32:08 AM
Well, that's nice, as I have a 2nd gen cpu  :why_so_serious:

In related news, Facebook has also been crashing on my mac's chrome. Luckily, I don't give a shit about facebook.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on February 28, 2021, 07:16:44 AM
Ahh, your "window" to pause feature updates/major releases must have expired so you are on 20H2.

I am guessing facebook is trying to do something uncouth with memory.

But you probably want to check and make sure your motherboard BIOS is up to date, and that your drivers are all also up to date.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: SurfD on February 28, 2021, 10:48:20 PM
Whelp, BSOD Number 4.  Stop code: SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED

Probably going to spend an hour or so tomorrow checking for Bios and Motherboard Driver updates, too tired to deal with this shit at the moment.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Sky on March 01, 2021, 01:35:01 PM
Or just fuck facebook.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Cyrrex on March 01, 2021, 10:44:32 PM
And now I had my facebook app on my ipad crash three times yesterday.  I think it's this thread.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Hawkbit on July 12, 2021, 10:51:56 AM
Anyone have any favorite mesh wifi? Our Archer C9 doesn't quite get get to the front of the house (lathe and plaster walls).

Wondering if I just need a wifi extender; I get signal but it drops frequently.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: lamaros on August 08, 2021, 01:22:42 AM
Edit. NM


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on October 07, 2021, 05:01:01 PM
I've got an older Dell PC (I dunno, maybe 10 years old 8? Fuck if I can recall) running Windows 10 and it's got a 2.4GHz wifi card. I have no idea of any of the specs of the card, or how it's slotted, or anything. I can look them up I guess?

I'd like to replace that with a 5GHz one but.....what should I get?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on October 07, 2021, 06:17:31 PM
You mean something like this?

https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-desktop-10-9-10-14-Archer-T2U/dp/B08D72GSMS

That assumes you have an USB 3.0 port available.

If you don't have that but have a free PCI-e slot then you are looking at something like this:

https://www.amazon.com/Network-PCIe-WiFi-Card-PC/dp/B016K0896K


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Morat20 on October 08, 2021, 10:41:32 AM
You mean something like this?

https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-desktop-10-9-10-14-Archer-T2U/dp/B08D72GSMS

That assumes you have an USB 3.0 port available.

If you don't have that but have a free PCI-e slot then you are looking at something like this:

https://www.amazon.com/Network-PCIe-WiFi-Card-PC/dp/B016K0896K

Thanks. Exactly what I needed.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Rasix on November 13, 2021, 08:53:52 AM
OK, yesterday we had a power blip at the house and upon rebooting the BIOS was throwing up an error saying there was a problem with the CPU fan. This now seems to happen every other time the system is rebooted.

Given that there was a distinct cause and effect, I figure something has an issue. I'm guessing it's either the motherboard, the AIO, or the power supply. Am I right in that I should probably look at making some replacements here? The system is a few years old.



Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on November 13, 2021, 10:33:33 AM
What is the BIOS reporting the RPMs of the CPU / AIO fan(s) on boot up? Is the CPU fan variable RPM (PWM)? If it’s variable speed if you adjust the RPM settings / fan curve is the fan changing speeds accordingly? Is your AIO pump plugged into a fan / PWM header on the motherboard? Which AIO are you using?

Some (hopefully) simple things to try before disconnecting the major components:

* Plug the existing CPU fan into a different motherboard fan header

* Plug a different fan into the fan header used by the CPU fan

Doesn’t sound like a power supply issue given how little power fans draw relative to other components especially if the fan is powered from the motherboard and not a molex / SATA power supply connector (I’m assuming it’s powered by the motherboard because the BIOS “sees” that fan). Hopefully it’s just bad fan(s) rather than the motherboard fan header. If it is a fan header if there’s another one you can use like “case” or “aux” that might be a workaround. You can also get a SATA / USB powered variable RPM fan controller but you may lose the ability to set a fan curve based on a temp.

Also get an AVR (Automatic Voltage Regulation) UPS, preferably a sine wave one, if fluctuating power is a semi-regular thing in your area.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Salamok on November 30, 2021, 01:26:48 PM
Anyone have any favorite mesh wifi? Our Archer C9 doesn't quite get get to the front of the house (lathe and plaster walls).

Wondering if I just need a wifi extender; I get signal but it drops frequently.

My Orbi (AC3000 2 stations) seems okay, it doesn't piss me off on a regular basis and seems to do the job.  I did have to convert it to access points instead of a router and ditch Disney Circle (which I liked) when I switched ISP's since the AT&T guy couldn't figure out how to bypass the AT&T router and I was getting some weird dual NAT issue.  I have had the Orbi for 2.5 years and run 15+ devices through it and it covers a 3800+ sqft house (doesn't quite hit the backyard as much as I would like).


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: schild on December 02, 2021, 10:27:03 AM
love my google wifi bullshit


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on April 05, 2022, 06:55:51 PM
I have a 6-year-old Zenbook that needs a new power adapter. I don't think ASUS sells replacements anymore since everything is USB-C now and it's an older barrel-style plug ("ADP-45DW" is written on the casing and yields search results that look right). I would prefer one that does not burn my house down. Are there reputable third-party manufacturers in this space or is literally the whole market overseas fly-by-nights?


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Trippy on April 05, 2022, 07:10:01 PM
Most of the market is indeed fly-by-night unless you can find an OEM model. This one is not OEM but is UL Listed (shows the certificate) so it's probably less likely to burn your house down. Probably.

https://www.amazon.com/PowerSource-AC-Adapter-Charger-Asus-ZenBook-UX360CA-UX305UA-Power-Supply/dp/B07GX4PJHM


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: Chimpy on April 05, 2022, 07:16:25 PM
Did you contact ASUS?

Usually they have ways to sell you replacement power adapters that isn't obvious on their website.


Title: Re: Quick [tech] Questions Thread
Post by: ezrast on April 05, 2022, 07:20:27 PM
Interacting with a human had not occurred to me, no. Nor was UL Listing on my radar as a thing to look for. Thanks to you both.