Title: Children of Men Post by: schild on January 03, 2007, 12:42:59 AM Oscars.
If you get the opportunity, you can not miss this movie. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Velorath on January 03, 2007, 12:44:08 AM Oscars. If you get the opportunity, you can not miss this movie. Well, no I can't miss it, but that's only because I'll be subjected to it at work. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: schild on January 03, 2007, 12:46:56 AM Subjected?
Bullshit. You'll enjoy every viewing of this thing. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Velorath on January 03, 2007, 12:52:15 AM Subjected? Bullshit. You'll enjoy every viewing of this thing. Well that's possible, and in all seriousness I have been looking forward to it. I should be getting a couple prints of it in tomorrow that I'll have to build so I guess I'll find out soon. Hell, I managed to enjoy Dreamgirls. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: ahoythematey on January 03, 2007, 01:52:06 AM Are you sure you aren't being lulled in by your love of Clive Owen?
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Ironwood on January 03, 2007, 02:55:04 AM Sorry, after the last 4 months, I'm not going to see anything that has 'Babies are Wondrous' as the central premise.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: schild on January 03, 2007, 03:16:40 AM The other two guys who watched it with me were stunned by the awesome that is Children of Men.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Ironwood on January 03, 2007, 03:18:25 AM And they're thinking of adopting now that the state lets them marry ?
:| Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: schild on January 03, 2007, 03:20:31 AM What?
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Ironwood on January 03, 2007, 03:23:30 AM Nevermind. I'm not taking being back at work too well. I have hit snark overdrive.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Signe on January 03, 2007, 07:46:09 AM I have giggled uncontrollably and still am.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Fabricated on January 03, 2007, 08:45:23 AM Oh yeah, this is the movie where everyone on earth suddenly can't have kids anymore and than like a few decades later the world has become Mad Max with Audis, some black woman mysteriously becomes pregnant and the rest of the movie is a "It's a small shitty hell-like world afterall" ride to a group of predictably secluded scientists.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Cheddar on January 03, 2007, 08:57:15 AM Oh, this movie looks hot. I will go watch it Friday.
I am a huge fan of dystopia and zombies. But not in that order. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: tazelbain on January 03, 2007, 09:05:04 AM Those damn Aschen are trying to conquer us again.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Krakrok on January 03, 2007, 10:00:40 AM Didn't Children of Men see Aeon Flux?
Edit: Sliders has a similar episode as well except 99.99% of the men died. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Yoru on January 03, 2007, 10:35:40 AM This sounds like a crappier, softened-up adaptation of Frank Herbert's "The White Plague".
Which I never actually finished reading... hm.. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Rasix on January 03, 2007, 10:46:48 AM 94% on Rotten Tomatoes plus Clive Owen. Yah. I'll be there.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Tale on January 03, 2007, 03:39:09 PM I'm surprised the US is only getting this in cinemas now. It's been and gone months ago in most of the world (http://imdb.com/title/tt0206634/releaseinfo).
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: angry.bob on January 03, 2007, 07:30:05 PM I'm surprised the US is only getting this in cinemas now. It's been and gone months ago in most of the world (http://imdb.com/title/tt0206634/releaseinfo). Shhhhhhh! Most American's don't realize we're not #1 at anything anymore, even in the order of movie releases. But at least our high retard/atheist quotient means that we're triple blessed by the love of Jesus. And who needs anything worldly when you have such a powerful blessing? And Ironwood, babies ARE wondrous. The key is in making your wife do everyting and you just play with it a couple hours a day while she cleans the house and makes more bottles. And to those of you about to bitch about my misogyny, one of us works 10 hours a day, 6 days a week and the other one stays at home and doesn't have a job aside from watching the kid. I'll be damned if I work 10 hours and then come home and wash the dishes she dirtied making food for herself. Also, The Wicker Man sucked. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Ironwood on January 04, 2007, 01:02:49 AM I'm surprised the US is only getting this in cinemas now. It's been and gone months ago in most of the world (http://imdb.com/title/tt0206634/releaseinfo). Yeah, I thought I'd already missed this opportunity ages ago, but I'm still drugged up, so I couldn't be sure. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Big Gulp on January 04, 2007, 06:04:20 AM Apparently it's "selected cities" too, so we're only getting a limited release. It's shades of 28 Days Later and The Descent all over again... Talk about leaving perfectly good money on the table.
Is it just that there aren't enough prints to go around? Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Tale on January 04, 2007, 07:55:34 AM Oh well, at least you got it before Kuwait.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Lantyssa on January 04, 2007, 11:56:48 AM I'm sure watching the kid and taking care of the house is only a couple hours a day job. :-P
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: MrHat on January 04, 2007, 11:57:13 AM I'm super excited to watch this, mainly because I have a huge man-crush on Clive.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: ahoythematey on January 04, 2007, 05:48:27 PM Those damn Aschen are trying to conquer us again. I'm awfully ashamed to have understood this. Bring back General Hammond, beyotches! Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Velorath on January 04, 2007, 08:46:41 PM Apparently it's "selected cities" too, so we're only getting a limited release. It's shades of 28 Days Later and The Descent all over again... Talk about leaving perfectly good money on the table. Is it just that there aren't enough prints to go around? They actually started the limited release a little over a week back, and it will be expanding to more theaters tomorrow. I don't think it has anything to do with a limited number of prints. The ones I built today were new, so it's not like I had to wait for another theater to finish with them. My understanding is that limited releases are usually used for marketing reasons, starting small and allowing positive word of mouth to spread before the larger opening. December is also a fairly tough month to compete in, while January and February often end up as the dumping ground for shit movies (Ghost Rider, I'm looking at you). Going up against shit like Codename: The Cleaner probably seemed more appealing than going up against Dreamgirls or Night at the Museum. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Polysorbate80 on January 05, 2007, 08:36:59 AM I'm sure watching the kid and taking care of the house is only a couple hours a day job. :-P Of course, that's the easy part. It's re-cleaning the house after the kids have destroyed it (faster than you can clean it in the first place) that takes more hours than are in the day. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: MrHat on January 06, 2007, 07:01:51 PM Best Foreign Film.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Abagadro on January 06, 2007, 09:11:09 PM This movie is amazing. Great, great film. It has the best single-take sequence in movie history. Go see it. Really.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: bhodi on January 06, 2007, 09:40:49 PM I agree. Excellent movie. Two, spoiler-laden questions for those who have seen it:
1) Why would the ENTIRE british army, after seeing the most amazing thing in 40 years, completely forget about her and her baby? I would think it would be more along the lines of "let's get you to saftey!" 2) On the bus near the end, what was the point of the man and the dog dragging people off the bus? Was it a scare tactic to convince people not to come back? Was the camp full? You saw the makings of execution squads out the window, but you didn't really see any of THEM get shot, so i was a bit confused. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: schild on January 06, 2007, 10:14:39 PM Best Foreign Film. What? This movie is american through and through. Only America produces movies that look like United Colors of Benneton ads. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Venkman on January 07, 2007, 05:19:29 AM Been wanting to see this. Haven't read anything, on purpose. Makes sense the rest of the world saw it first to. Until this past November, it would have excommunicable blasphemy in the U.S.
Quote from: angry.bob And to those of you about to bitch about my misogyny, one of us works 10 hours a day, 6 days a week and the other one stays at home and doesn't have a job aside from watching Fighting words. ;) Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: MrHat on January 07, 2007, 10:58:13 AM Best Foreign Film. What? This movie is american through and through. Only America produces movies that look like United Colors of Benneton ads. Felt foreign. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: sinij on January 08, 2007, 12:08:57 PM Best movie I have seen in a long time. I was impressed by story, characters and set.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Yegolev on January 08, 2007, 02:17:54 PM Want to see the movie. Clive Owen.
Babies are no fun. Toddlers, however, are lots of fun. Until six months in they are basically like lumps that shit everywhere. After that, the awesome starts. I would much, much rather be at work than at home. Here I can at least ignore people during lunch or go eat something at a restaurant. Less crying and smell of shit, too. Of course, I'd swap places with the wife if she could make any amount of money. Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: LK on January 08, 2007, 03:58:12 PM I'll be seeing it this Friday. Glad to know it'll be interesting.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: tazelbain on January 08, 2007, 04:50:34 PM I went in expecting more propaganda, but really their wasn't much. Plenty of bad behavior all around and really what can you expect in a world with everything falling apart. Even if you lived in a part of the world that wasn't fucked, you'd still have to deal with all kinds of imported fuckedupness that you are bound to attract.
Title: Re: Children of Men Post by: Miguel on January 09, 2007, 02:20:57 PM Generally I thought it was a pretty good flick.
I give two thumbs up to the camera work and the acting. Clive Owen did what Clive Owen does best: go through the entire movie without so much as cracking a smile or showing the faintest bit of emotion: yet it still worked perfectly just like in Croupier. Some of those single-camera action takes literally had everything in the theater visibly forward in their seats for long periods of time. I never felt like I wasn't in the thick of things from start to finish. The storyline was a little better than 'meh' to me. I guess I'm growing tired of the old 'we must band together and sing cum-bah-ya or else we are DOOMED' storyline. I thought some of the more politicized aspects were rather blatant and could have been left out without effecting the overall feel and pace however. But that was just me. A definite must see though! |