f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Eve Online => Topic started by: dwindlehop on June 29, 2006, 04:45:40 PM



Title: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on June 29, 2006, 04:45:40 PM
How's this for 0.0 ratting or mining guard?

Cyclone

720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
Heavy Missile Launcher I [29xHavoc Heavy Missile]
Heavy Missile Launcher I [29xHavoc Heavy Missile]
Heavy Missile Launcher I [29xHavoc Heavy Missile]

Shield Boost Amplifier I
Medium Shield Booster II
Cap Recharger I
Invulnerability Field I
Invulnerability Field I

Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I

Valkyrie I
Valkyrie I
Warrior I
Warrior I
Warrior I
Light Armor Maintenance Bot I

3619 shield, 14.54/s, E/T/K/Ex=41/53/64/76
2875 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
2456.7029760000005 cap, +25.91/s, -26.4/s
198.0 m/s
QF says 3 min 02 sec to kill Angel War General, dunno what it would be with reloading/npc tank taken into account

Light Armor Maintenance Bot is there to fix up a shield tanking gang member who goes into armor while we're far from station. With BC 3 (which I don't have yet) the active tank looks like 48 hp/s for 10 minutes, or indefinitely with just one invuln. Adding active to passive, that's 262 dps before resists for Ex dmg. I'm mostly worried about tanking EM damage (106 dps before resists, which is low), both from big Angels as well as lone HACs trying to ruin our fun. Should I swap out an Invuln for a EM Hardener?

I'm also looking for thoughts on where to take my skills over the next month. I could go to 5 on Energy Systems Operation, or start on the EM/EX/K/T Shield Compensation skills, or pump up my BC skill. I'd really like to find a fitting that has a good tank that lasts five minutes or more with a gyrostab in the lows.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Megrim on June 29, 2006, 05:04:13 PM
You might want to switch the 720s for 650s. They have better dps.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on June 29, 2006, 05:14:11 PM
Er, no? How do you figure?

650: 4/12.75=0.31
720: 5.75/15.75=0.365

720s have half the capacity... Are you saying reloading time switches it around? 720s hold 13 Fusion, 650s hold 26. So 650s do 26x4/(12.75*26+10)=.304 and 720s do 13x5.75/(13*15.75+10)=0.348. So 720s are just better, as far as I can tell.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 29, 2006, 05:26:39 PM
The 720s also have a longer range, which adds to the DPS slightly. I have a very similar setup on mine-

named 720s x5
named Heavy Launchers x3

Named Shield Recharger
Med Shield Booster II
Invuln. Field
Kinetic Hardener
Named AB (for looting purposes...don't wanna give up the DPS that a tractor beam would take)

PDU
Named Damage Control
Named Gyrostab
Named Tracking Enhancer


Once I figured out what ammo to use (I was using ammo that was doing the LEAST damage possible due to resists), I can take dual 950k BS + support frigs/cruisers with ease. Like to find something slightly bigger to see how the tank holds up. I am sure it would be fine to tank any NPC if I swapped the AB for an explosive hardener.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Megrim on June 29, 2006, 05:46:37 PM
Er, no? How do you figure?

650: 4/12.75=0.31
720: 5.75/15.75=0.365

720s have half the capacity... Are you saying reloading time switches it around? 720s hold 13 Fusion, 650s hold 26. So 650s do 26x4/(12.75*26+10)=.304 and 720s do 13x5.75/(13*15.75+10)=0.348. So 720s are just better, as far as I can tell.

I don't mean to question your maths, but those formulas are exact? I definitely remember the 650s out-dps'ing the 720s.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on June 29, 2006, 06:32:46 PM
The 220s out-dpsed the 425s because the reload on the 425s was too often until they boosted the capacity. I think 720s have always been better than 650s.
Here's what QF says:
Damage Output Stats   
[ 200 | 21] 650mm Artillery Cannon I [26xFusion M]
Rate of fire : 8.583 sec
Damage modifier : 5.2118
Scan resolution : 125.0
Tracking speed : 0.02835
Estimated best Range : 21236.0m.
Chance to hit : 86.28%
Shield One Shot Damage (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 12.5 + 33.4 = 45.9
Damage / sec (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 1.5 + 3.9 = 5.4
Armor One Shot Damage (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 15.6 + 75.1 = 90.7
Damage / sec (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 1.8 + 8.7 = 10.5
Structure One Shot Damage (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 20.8 + 83.4 = 104.2
Damage / sec (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 2.4 + 9.7 = 12.1     

[ 250 | 24] 720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
Rate of fire : 10.603 sec
Damage modifier : 6.8109
Scan resolution : 125.0
Tracking speed : 0.0231
Estimated best Range : 24600.0m.
Chance to hit : 93.71%
Shield One Shot Damage (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 16.3 + 43.6 = 59.9
Damage / sec (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 1.5 + 4.1 = 5.6
Armor One Shot Damage (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 20.4 + 98.1 = 118.5
Damage / sec (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 1.9 + 9.3 = 11.2
Structure One Shot Damage (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 27.2 + 109.0 = 136.2
Damage / sec (EM+TH+KI+EX) : 0.0 + 0.0 + 2.6 + 10.3 = 12.9

QF says the 720 is better by 6% instead of 17% as I calculated. QF believes the damage multiplier on 650s is 4.4x, but the item database (http://www.eve-online.com/itemdatabase/shipequipment/turretsbays/projectileturrets/artillerycannons/medium/492.asp) thinks it is 4x. I'll info a 650 in game and see which is right. Either set of numbers works with my math, though, and they both say 720s are better. Kinda silly if they weren't, for the grid they suck up.  :-D


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Megrim on June 29, 2006, 06:37:01 PM
I must have been following AC logic then, on the assumption that the 720s were better for alpha strikes, with the 650s being better over time.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on June 29, 2006, 06:38:17 PM
The 720s also have a longer range, which adds to the DPS slightly. I have a very similar setup on mine-

named 720s x5
named Heavy Launchers x3

Named Shield Recharger
Med Shield Booster II
Invuln. Field
Kinetic Hardener
Named AB (for looting purposes...don't wanna give up the DPS that a tractor beam would take)

PDU
Named Damage Control
Named Gyrostab
Named Tracking Enhancer


Once I figured out what ammo to use (I was using ammo that was doing the LEAST damage possible due to resists), I can take dual 950k BS + support frigs/cruisers with ease. Like to find something slightly bigger to see how the tank holds up. I am sure it would be fine to tank any NPC if I swapped the AB for an explosive hardener.
I want to fit an AB myself, actually. Any particular reason for the shield recharger? How long can you run the booster+hardeners?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Strazos on June 29, 2006, 07:32:22 PM
I'm really jealous of these damn Cyclone BCs running around now. I may have to duel someone to see how I really stack up in my Ferox.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 30, 2006, 07:05:46 AM
The 720s also have a longer range, which adds to the DPS slightly. I have a very similar setup on mine-

named 720s x5
named Heavy Launchers x3

Named Shield Recharger
Med Shield Booster II
Invuln. Field
Kinetic Hardener
Named AB (for looting purposes...don't wanna give up the DPS that a tractor beam would take)

PDU
Named Damage Control
Named Gyrostab
Named Tracking Enhancer


Once I figured out what ammo to use (I was using ammo that was doing the LEAST damage possible due to resists), I can take dual 950k BS + support frigs/cruisers with ease. Like to find something slightly bigger to see how the tank holds up. I am sure it would be fine to tank any NPC if I swapped the AB for an explosive hardener.
I want to fit an AB myself, actually. Any particular reason for the shield recharger? How long can you run the booster+hardeners?

It is a work in progress- this is the first ship I have ever had to shield tank in, so I am feeling my way around. With the PDU. the recharger, and the Cyclone Battlecruiser bonus, I get pretty decent passive regen. The booster is for tanking big spawns (or, eventually, PvP). If/when I get my specific damage compensation skills to 4 or 5, I may try for a totally passive tank with some shield relays (ala the Ferox). That is a lot of training though, when I have tons of other stuff to work on...


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on June 30, 2006, 10:01:42 AM
It is a work in progress- this is the first ship I have ever had to shield tank in, so I am feeling my way around. With the PDU. the recharger, and the Cyclone Battlecruiser bonus, I get pretty decent passive regen. The booster is for tanking big spawns (or, eventually, PvP). If/when I get my specific damage compensation skills to 4 or 5, I may try for a totally passive tank with some shield relays (ala the Ferox). That is a lot of training though, when I have tons of other stuff to work on...
The BC bonus doesn't apply to passive regen, does it?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 30, 2006, 11:05:27 AM
I thought it was shield regen, but it is shield boosting, so you are probably right.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 06, 2006, 05:25:19 PM
I played around with the tanking spreadsheet (from http://www.eve-tanking.com/) and decided it was better to have 3x hardeners rather than 2x invulns and a cap recharger. I'll have to offline one hardener per fight because I don't have the CPU. With Elec5 I could have 2x hardeners and a resistance amp online at once, which is probably what I'll do. With Energy Grid Upgrades 5 I could have a hardener again, but I doubt I'll be taking Energy Grid Upgrades to 5 any time soon.

Cyclone

5x 720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
3x Heavy Missile Launcher I [29xHavoc Heavy Missile]

Medium Shield Booster II
Explosion Dampening Field I
Heat Dissipation Field I
Shield Boost Amplifier I
Ballistic Deflection Field I

4x Power Diagnostic System I

2x Valkyrie I
3x Warrior I
Light Armor Maintenance Bot I

3619 shield, 14.54/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/60/70/80
2875 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
2354.340352 cap, +19.21/s, -24.8/s (-22.8/s with just 2 hardeners)
198.0 m/s
3 min 19 sec on a Saint, 2 min 56 sec on a War General (better skills than last time is only difference dps-wise)

Using Ex, Kin, and Th hardeners, the spreadsheet says I can tank 3 Thrones for 266.83 seconds or 3 Saints for 241.31 seconds. Against Seraphim (EM) I would have to run. Once I get BC to 4 (three days left) I'll be able to tank 3 Thrones for more than 5 minutes. With Energy Systems Operation 4 (1 day left), I'll have the cap to run my tank for five minutes flat out, or indefinitely with a 90% duty cycle.

Trying to figure out which three hardeners to use, I looked at all the basic BC and BS Angel damage. I thought perhaps other people might find this useful, so here it is. Two basic asteroid BSs do thermal, and one does EM. There's also two which do primarily kinetic, which I didn't realize. The missile damage, which is always Ex, does increase the overall Ex percentage by quite a bit. There's also a big smear of different damage types on the smaller boats and Arch Angels, but the table gets too messy. Download the spreadsheet yourself.

Turret:Missile:
NPC Name:No. of them.EMExplKinThermDamage Mod:Rate of Fire:EMExplKinThermMissile Rate of Fire:Explosion Radius:Explosion Velocity:
Enemy 1Angel Saint0008327.38502700015400250
Enemy 2Angel Malakim0032804.151.50000100
Enemy 3Angel Nephilim0083207.38502700013.75400250
Enemy 4Angel Seraphim02016801050300009225375
Enemy 5Angel Throne3032804.351.50000100
Enemy 6Angel General0082802.51.502700021400250
Enemy 7Angel War General0032803.381.50000100
Enemy 8Angel Commander00328031.50000100
Enemy 9Angel Cherubim0008321050300009226.23377.05
Enemy 10Angel Warlord0032802.751.502700022.5400250
Enemy 11Angel Legatus0108408507500341.6832
Enemy 12Angel Legionnaire001440650150006.2585.25639.38
Enemy 13Angel Praefectus0041404.51.50000100
Enemy 14Angel Primus0041406.2550150005.7584.84636.3
Enemy 15Angel Tribuni0014404.251.50000100
Enemy 16Angel Tribunus0004168507500341.81836.1


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Soln on July 07, 2006, 07:14:20 AM
Can you stack Invulnerability Field I?  regardless, Cyclones do seem sweet (I've been saving for a Ferox)


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Roac on July 07, 2006, 07:26:13 AM
I've been flying a Ferox for a few weeks.  It's a nice step up from a Caracel for missions due to the shield boost - both from inheritly more shields and from fitting better shield mods.  The loss of firepower is fine, esp. since you can't snipe in deadspace, and because I tend to eat more missiles than fire them.  Unless you wanted to cheaply fit gang mods, I'm not sure I'd carry one into PvP, as I think the Caracel (or a BS if you want to go up) might play better and for less cash. 


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Yoru on July 07, 2006, 10:20:36 AM
Can you stack Invulnerability Field I?  regardless, Cyclones do seem sweet (I've been saving for a Ferox)

Yes, but each time you add another one, you get diminishing returns.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 07, 2006, 11:12:09 AM
2x Invulns give a EM of 41% from 0. 3x invulns starts to really feel the stacking penalty: they go to just 49%.

My main problem with invulns is the cap. They eat -4/s. A single damage type hardener eats -2/s. Also, when ratting I can keep one hardener unactive depending on what I'm fighting, using even less cap. With invulns I can't selectively keep one or two off to help manage cap without taking more damage.

I can keep all the single damage hardeners online if I get the right named ones. Time to go market hunting.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Comstar on July 07, 2006, 04:17:32 PM
Hmm, all these cyclones don't seem to be playing to it's strength: extra projectiles and extra shield boosting.
5x220 AC  (Fusion for the Angels)
1 Heavy Launcher (because I don't need 3 NOSs, Havoc missles)
2 medium NOS (because I need them to run the AB/Shield Booster)

Afterburner
Shield Booster Med II
Shield boost Amplifer (30%+the cyclones bonus)
Large shield (because I dont have the skill for an invunrability field)
Webber (because I'm going to be under 10km range with the AC's, and stopping angel cruisers running away and firing missles back at me. Also inty's die)

3 Gyros (Bonus to the cylones bonus)
Engine overdrive (with my close range weapons, I need to get close, fast. Faster than a nano-fiber and the smaller cargo space isn't a problem too much, I tend to run out of ammo by the time my cargo is full anyway)

And 4 Valkyries to much away at whatever I'm targetting, or deal with Frigates while I go for the cruisers/battleships. Quite good vs Arch Angel Frigates.


Now I can take on a single Angel Battleship +escorts without a problem. I could take on 2 Angel Saints + escorts, but it's risky and I lost my first Cyclone doing that when I got cought on a asteroid. Battleships are actually easier to take on than the missle firing angel cruisers, because once I get close to them, they can't hit me at the speed I'm going around them. This setup, I can rat in -0.05 space.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 07, 2006, 04:51:10 PM
I'd go for a large shield booster if you want to run Nos. Gives you something to do with all that cap. And hardeners make your boost bigger. Try the large booster and some hardeners in place of the amp and extender once you have the skills. Large shield booster 2 is 50% more hp/s than Med booster 2 & amplifier.

I need to play more so I stumble across some of the bigger spawns to test my tank.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Engels on July 07, 2006, 07:34:00 PM
I'm confused. What are you calling hardeners? Because in game, the things they call hardeners are armor-only resists hull upgrades that go on the low power slot.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 07, 2006, 10:44:10 PM
Shields have med power slots mods that behave exactly like the armor mods. They're also called hardeners.

http://www.eve-online.com/itemdatabase/shipequipment/shield/shieldhardeners/default.asp


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Engels on July 08, 2006, 08:35:05 AM
Shields have med power slots mods that behave exactly like the armor mods. They're also called hardeners.

http://www.eve-online.com/itemdatabase/shipequipment/shield/shieldhardeners/default.asp

Well, I'll be ... never saw that. Thanks!


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 08, 2006, 04:20:04 PM
Didn't find anything bigger than 3x 950k (Warlords?) plus 2x Phalanxes. Tank held up fine. Had to feather the booster a bit just before I finished off the first one because I let 3 drones die so my dps blew, but the shield regen held the fort between boosts.

Unfortunately I found another spawn exactly like this and didn't engage the booster or hardeners and went afk. um, yeah.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 09, 2006, 03:57:40 PM
Got in a new Cyclone and found 2x Nephilim plus 3x Phalanx. Took down the Phalanxes first. No tank issues. Got another spawn of the same type and went for the Nephilim first, which was a big mistake. The five ships together can break my tank before I can bring down the BS. Didn't lose the ship, but I did go below 50% armor. I'm slowly figuring out best practices for these big rats. Also important is not sending out med drones until all the rats target me, because they'll bring down a med drone in a hurry.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Raging Turtle on July 09, 2006, 06:06:56 PM
Yep, always take out the little guys first


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Reg on July 10, 2006, 03:56:47 AM
Definitely. The little guys are the ones who will web and scramble you too.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 10, 2006, 10:07:38 AM
Interesting new datum! Guys in local claim, and my limited experience confirms, that if you leave escorts alive the BSs respawn much faster. This is a very bad idea with scramming escorts or those nasty Phalanxes, but with 2x Saints and 3x Hunters it's a breeze. Found a spawn like that this morning (and offlined my kinetic for thermal resist) and by the time I killed one Saint a second had popped up. I did quite a few Saints chained like that, and eventually had to go to work. Very handy for income. No problem to tank, either.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 10, 2006, 11:41:01 AM
Wow- gonna have to try that.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Raging Turtle on July 10, 2006, 11:51:34 AM
Interesting new datum! Guys in local claim, and my limited experience confirms, that if you leave escorts alive the BSs respawn much faster. This is a very bad idea with scramming escorts or those nasty Phalanxes, but with 2x Saints and 3x Hunters it's a breeze. Found a spawn like that this morning (and offlined my kinetic for thermal resist) and by the time I killed one Saint a second had popped up. I did quite a few Saints chained like that, and eventually had to go to work. Very handy for income. No problem to tank, either.

Define much faster?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 10, 2006, 11:56:51 AM
It takes me four to five minutes to down a Saint. I don't know exactly how long; it varies depending on the initial range. In that four to five minutes, I'd say the second Saint spawns with about a minute and a half left on the first Saint. So one Saint spawns roughly every three and a half minutes. People who do lots of mining or belt clearing might have a better idea of what the respawn rate is if you kill all the ships. I'd guesstimate about a full spawn every twenty minutes?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Gong on July 10, 2006, 02:31:23 PM
Interesting new datum! Guys in local claim, and my limited experience confirms, that if you leave escorts alive the BSs respawn much faster. This is a very bad idea with scramming escorts or those nasty Phalanxes, but with 2x Saints and 3x Hunters it's a breeze. Found a spawn like that this morning (and offlined my kinetic for thermal resist) and by the time I killed one Saint a second had popped up. I did quite a few Saints chained like that, and eventually had to go to work. Very handy for income. No problem to tank, either.

Define much faster?

It's called Chaining. as long as you leave at least one member of a spawn alive, the rest of the group will respawn in exactly the same composition, whereas killing it all will result in a random new configuration of enemies. so once you get a nice highvalue multi-battleship spawn, you can keep milking it over and over.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Raging Turtle on July 10, 2006, 03:10:10 PM
Very useful to know.  No wonder I got the feeling I was the only one warping from belt to belt to rat...

A few questions:  Does the spawn reset if the group warps out, as rats will occasionally do?  Is there still a chance for a named/commander unit to spawn in place of a regular rat ship?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Der Helm on July 10, 2006, 10:32:27 PM
Yesterday, I just got my feet wet in 0.0, ratting with my little cyclone in 0.0 (JLO if memory serves me right). Even with a sup par fitting, this little baby shield tanks the spawns without a problem.

Right now I am running a standard setup with active hardeners and a medium shield booster.

I am thinking about trying out a passive resist setup, since my autocannons and missiles don't use cap at all, so I can fit lots of shield recoils (trading cap-recharge for shieldrecharge)

Anyone ever tried this with a cyclone ? On the official forums I found a passive tanked rifter setup that looked promising, any idea if it will work out with a cyclone (even if I neglect the shield booster bonus by going passive) ?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Gong on July 11, 2006, 08:06:56 AM
Very useful to know.  No wonder I got the feeling I was the only one warping from belt to belt to rat...

A few questions:  Does the spawn reset if the group warps out, as rats will occasionally do?  Is there still a chance for a named/commander unit to spawn in place of a regular rat ship?

Nah, it stays the same - the spawn is just warping to another belt, after all. The spawn will still respawn the same way, but they'll be in the new belt. If you were asking if the spawn that replaces them would be reset and in a new random configuration, then yes, it will be a new group of enemies that eventually respawns to take their place. You can still find your old friends in whatever belt they went to. It's not so much that this process makes the overall respawn hugely faster (it does seem somewhat faster), the biggest benefit is that you don't waste time on bullshit spawns like 7x 100k battlecruisers or things like that.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: edlavallee on July 11, 2006, 09:10:24 AM
Question: If you do find said bullshit spawn, would it be wide to eliminate them and hope that something better will replace it?


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 11, 2006, 09:18:46 AM
That is my feeling- kill the crappy spawns and hope a rare pops.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Gong on July 11, 2006, 09:43:50 AM
Question: If you do find said bullshit spawn, would it be wide to eliminate them and hope that something better will replace it?

correct.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Llyse on July 12, 2006, 02:54:34 PM
Chaining definitely works btw, had a triple spawn of 1.5mills Thrones, left the frigs went to a double spawn of Saints ( god they hurt) By the time I finished that and another single spawn of Saints the Thrones were back  :-D


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 12, 2006, 02:57:08 PM
Yeah Saints are a PITA to tank when you are set up for the normal Angel damage.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 18, 2006, 10:47:58 AM
Using Ex, Kin, and Th hardeners, the spreadsheet says I can tank 3 Thrones for 266.83 seconds or 3 Saints for 241.31 seconds. Against Seraphim (EM) I would have to run. Once I get BC to 4 (three days left) I'll be able to tank 3 Thrones for more than 5 minutes. With Energy Systems Operation 4 (1 day left), I'll have the cap to run my tank for five minutes flat out, or indefinitely with a 90% duty cycle.
I found 3x Saints and had to run. The numbers I quoted had all three hardeners active, which I don't have the CPU for. There's two minutes' difference between having all three hardeners going and having just the Ex & Th. I still don't have BC4 (yay margin trading). With BC4 and Elec5, I'll be all set. I only have 24 hours left on BC4, but Elec5 is still another week at least. I'm still trying to figure out an interim fitting that can take 3 Thrones or 3 Saints.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 18, 2006, 11:33:02 AM
FFS, a decent pair of named launchers will make it work, if I have Elec5, or named launchers + named hardeners if I don't. I have a Malkuth, so I just need one more. I can't believe I've been offlining my stupid hardeners for a week and a half. Where're those stupid Saints?

Now I can concentrate on shield and cap skills instead of Electronics.

Cyclone

720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
720mm Howitzer Artillery I [13xFusion M]
Heavy Missile Launcher I [29xHavoc Heavy Missile]
'Malkuth' Heavy Missile Launcher I [32xHavoc Heavy Missile]
'Malkuth' Heavy Missile Launcher I [32xHavoc Heavy Missile]

Medium Shield Booster II
Explosion Dampening Field I
Heat Dissipation Field I
Shield Boost Amplifier I
Ballistic Deflection Field I

Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I

Valkyrie I
Valkyrie I
Warrior I
Warrior I
Valkyrie I

3619 shield, 14.54/s, E/T/K/Ex=0/60/70/80
3000 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
2354.340352 cap, +21.1/s, -24.8/s
198.0 m/s
100.7 DPS (2:17 to take down a War General)

a bunch of grid and like 7 cpu left over

I can run all mods flat out for about four minutes, so versus three Saints I'd run my cap into the ground until I took one down and then burn my shields while my cap got back up to 29%. I think it might work.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Der Helm on July 18, 2006, 10:39:34 PM
Yesterday I bought the Minmatar Battleship skill.And trained it to level II

I'll be gone for about a week (www.metalcamp.com) that is enough time to get my gunnery skill to 5 so I can train large projectile turrets.

Now all I need is 150 million credits for a decent BS, insurance and a cushion to fall back on.

So I hope you guys have a setup that will allow me to tank those 1mill+ BS rats,when I come back. I need the cash.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 20, 2006, 11:36:49 AM
It's not difficult to run a 10MN MWD indefinitely with a Cyclone. You can also get a 100MN AB on and run that indefinitely with decent Navigation skills. Has anyone attempted either one of these with ACs? I'm sure whatever BS you were targeting would completely miss you but I'm not sure about the other BSs. Might be fun to experiment with.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Strazos on July 20, 2006, 11:43:55 AM
Der Helm, you could probably tank 1m+ BSs in your own BS in your sleep...I practically can in a Ferox.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: dwindlehop on July 20, 2006, 04:27:58 PM
While I'm looking around for more Malkuth launchers I will also try to find a Large Shield Booster II. Then I could try this guy:
Cyclone

Medium Nosferatu I
Medium Nosferatu I
Medium Nosferatu I
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon I [106xFusion M]
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon I [106xFusion M]
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon I [106xFusion M]
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon I [106xFusion M]
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon I [106xFusion M]

Invulnerability Field I
Invulnerability Field I
F-S15 Braced Deflection Shield Matrix
100MN Afterburner I
Large Shield Booster II

Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I
Power Diagnostic System I

Valkyrie I
Valkyrie I
Valkyrie I
Warrior I
Warrior I

3619 shield, 14.54/s, E/T/K/Ex=41/53/64/86
3000 armor, E/T/K/Ex=70/35/25/10
2354.340352 cap, +21.1/s, -69.421/s
721.908 m/s
102.5 DPS (2:14 to down a War General)

I calculate I can keep the booster on 70% of the time with the afterburner off. The absolute tanking isn't as good as my arty version versus Saints, but I'd have a chance versus a couple of Seraphim if I ever find any. If I can avoid taking hits by going 720 m/s all the time I think it'll do better than my arty fitting. With the AB on, I hover around 55% cap, so I can run the booster a few cycles if the shield regen can't handle whatever damage I eat. I'm not sure how many hits I can avoid by going fast, though.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: edlavallee on July 20, 2006, 04:54:51 PM
You need Malkuth Launchers? Hit me up in game and make me sift thru my stash... I seem to remember one dropped last time I was ratting.


Title: Re: more 0.0 ratting!
Post by: Furiously on July 21, 2006, 11:18:15 AM
Yesterday I bought the Minmatar Battleship skill.And trained it to level II

I'll be gone for about a week (www.metalcamp.com) that is enough time to get my gunnery skill to 5 so I can train large projectile turrets.

Now all I need is 150 million credits for a decent BS, insurance and a cushion to fall back on.

So I hope you guys have a setup that will allow me to tank those 1mill+ BS rats,when I come back. I need the cash.

If you want to tank rats, get an AF. If you want to damage them however....