f13.net

f13.net General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Johny Cee on June 01, 2006, 07:57:23 PM



Title: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 01, 2006, 07:57:23 PM
Since the last TV thread has sunk too far to be necroed,  I figured we need a new one.

Sopranos --  The big season finale coming up.  The major question is whether they'll continue to set up a NY vs. NJ war,  or if we'll have another last minute reconciliation like we did with the last season.

Supposedly next season is the last,  and a gang war would make some fun TV.

Deadwood -- New season starts next Sunday.  The previews for it have been great,  really setting the tone.  You have the mining situation heating up (Widow Garrett vs. Hearst),  Swearengen (cocksucker!) and Bullock,  Tolliver who is just an evil evil bastard,  and historically lots more Western legends are supposed to breeze into town.

Rescue Me --  Season 3 started on Monday.

I missed the premier,  but rewatched season 2 on DVD.  FUCK, this is good drama.  The most painful portrayal of alcoholism I think I've ever seen.

FX replays the hell out of it,  so will catch the premier on Sunday at 10pm.

Venture Bros -- Restarting in June with season 2.  I love this show.  It really speaks to how much potential the animated format has.  The characters manage to be real people and cartoonish archetypes at the same time.

And it's immensely quotable.

Justice League -- My nostalgia kick.  Great superhero action cartoon.  Cartoon Network has been screwing with the schedule,  so I think I've missed most of this final season.  It gets my vote as best realization on screen of what comics can be and do.

I'm still mourning the death of Dead Like Me,  which was a neat character based show with minor comedy/supernatural elements to leaven the fact that it often dealth with very serious topics (death, relationships, family, work).

Sort of on my radar:  Dresden Files and Battlestar Galactica.

Dresden Files should be airing sometime soon,  and is an adaption of Jim Butcher's "Dresden Files" series of books.  Noir detective fiction meets supernatural/alternate reality.  Basically,  supernatural critters live side by side with real world stuff,  but ordinary people have a tough time seeing/believing it.  Has a Whedonesque vibe,  though I hope there will be much more plot progression....

Battlestar Galactica....   I dropped the ball here.  I like the series,  but work and social pressures meant I missed the entire last season.  May have to hold out for the DVDs and catch up.

I know it's great TV.

Anyway,  folks have anything more to add?  I'm a sporadic TV viewer,  so I always like to be turned on to something good.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 01, 2006, 08:07:23 PM
I finally started watching Deadwood. Season 1 was great, but I'm starting to loseinterest at the beginning of 2. Probably won't bother with 3. Burned out on Sopranos in the same way as well.

Probably not relevant to this thread, but I've pretty much kept my TV on Discovery Science 90% of the time. It's like the good ole days, when American Chopper and "When Tornadoes Strike!!" didn't exist.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 01, 2006, 08:14:07 PM
There was a blub in EW this week that because Milch is starting some other show that this will be the last season of Deadwood and he even turned down the ability to have a 3-5 episode "final" season to wrap up storylines. They apparently didn't renew any of the contracts for the actors. No other confirmation beyond that at this point but that sounds really stupid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 01, 2006, 08:14:45 PM
I finally started watching Deadwood. Season 1 was great, but I'm starting to loseinterest at the beginning of 2. Probably won't bother with 3. Burned out Sopranos a long time ago as well.

Probably not relevant to this thread, but I've pretty much kept my TV on Discovery Science 90% of the time. It's like the good ole days, when American Chopper and "When Tornadoes Strike!!" didn't exist.

Season 2 of Deadwood starts off slowly.  Al is sidelined for a while,  the Doctor doesn't show up much,  Janey Stubbs is kind of meh.  Bout half way in it gets going.

Tolliver starts acting like a complete evil bastard,  Woo's problems,  and the behind the scenes politicking and deal-making are all interesting.  The triumphant return of Swearengen marks where the show starts going full bore.

The Swearengen monolgues are amazing, I think.  I thought that monologues were completely a lost art.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on June 01, 2006, 08:32:53 PM
There was a blub in EW this week that because Milch is starting some other show that this will be the last season of Deadwood and he even turned down the ability to have a 3-5 episode "final" season to wrap up storylines. They apparently didn't renew any of the contracts for the actors. No other confirmation beyond that at this point but that sounds really stupid.

Yes, the actors are all free to pursue other work. If they do manage to get HBO to pay for a wrap up, they'll probably have to call in other actors to fill some of the key roles. As Al would say: If I bleet when I speak that’s because I just got fuckin’ fleeced.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on June 01, 2006, 11:20:21 PM
I was thinking about necro posting the old thread. Did you guys hear that Surface was canceled? :(

I'm not watching anything right now, but the cool thing is SG-1 and Atlantis start right after the World Cup is over :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Kenrick on June 02, 2006, 05:17:39 AM
I'm still mourning the death of Dead Like Me,  which was a neat character based show with minor comedy/supernatural elements to leaven the fact that it often dealth with very serious topics (death, relationships, family, work).

That was definitely an interesting show... but I never could get the image out of my head of that main star being an adolescent lesbian (http://imdb.com/title/tt0256459/).  Kind of ruined it for me for some reason.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 02, 2006, 05:48:38 AM
Just started watching Boston Legal. Haven't we had like 3 threads that devolved into conversations about Dead Like Me. Dresden Files sounds interesting and maybe I'm not getting the Whedon comparison, but his shit and Dresden seem like they aren't alike at all. During the summer I generally fall back to watching foreign (read: asian) drama and anime and then pick up my american tv watching in the fall. I'll still watch the same shit: Smallville, Gilmore Girls, House, etc.

Edit: Oh, and Supernatural. That show is just fucking awesome. As much as I love Grey's Anatomy, I'm super happy they killed off Denny since he became a star on Supernatural. I didn't want to see him have to choose to play a bit part, even IF he got to touch Katherine Heigl's boobies every week - every man deserves that. Or at least Denny did.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 02, 2006, 06:03:11 AM
I'm sorry....  Your post was a blur after "Katherine Heigl's boobies".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 02, 2006, 06:32:17 AM
That girls is extremely hawt.  I still have a couple of her pictures on this laptop.

Yeah, I'm posting from work on a work laptop;  your point ?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 02, 2006, 08:38:41 AM
I've been watching the same old stuff, Bullshit is in new episodes and is always fun. Discovery HD when it's nature or science, though I do enjoy American Chopper. HDNet has some great programming, HDNet World Report is usually intense and a nice fairly in-depth look at news like news channels don't do. Sound Off with Matt Pinfield is cool, too, he's a good interviewer.

Been into the Food stuff lately, License to Grill, Good Eats, Jacques Pepin (on PBS). Dr Who is ok, I don't enjoy it as much as I do the Stargates, but it's good saturday morning stuff (thanks, DVR). I'm watching Odyssey 5, some HD channel is playing the first season, it's not quite as good as Who imo, but it's helping fill the Stargate jones...

Mostly nature, science, food, current events (not news, though) and music.

Network stuff: The Office and Earl is about it.

Guilty stuff: Supergroup. I love Nuge.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 02, 2006, 08:43:17 AM
This will be Deadwood's last season, and Justice League has already finished its run. I forgot about Rescue Me, and I didn't see it on my Tivo, so I have to make sure I get it sometime this weekend.

Most of my TV viewing has come to an end with the end of most of the seasons. I will say that The Unit, Dennis Haysbert's new thing, has been surprisingly good. It's got a bit too much Desperate Housewives, but the action bits outweigh those.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 02, 2006, 09:33:56 AM
I finally started watching Deadwood. Season 1 was great, but I'm starting to loseinterest at the beginning of 2. Probably won't bother with 3. Burned out Sopranos a long time ago as well.

Probably not relevant to this thread, but I've pretty much kept my TV on Discovery Science 90% of the time. It's like the good ole days, when American Chopper and "When Tornadoes Strike!!" didn't exist.

Season 2 of Deadwood starts off slowly.  Al is sidelined for a while,  the Doctor doesn't show up much,  Janey Stubbs is kind of meh.  Bout half way in it gets going.

Tolliver starts acting like a complete evil bastard,  Woo's problems,  and the behind the scenes politicking and deal-making are all interesting.  The triumphant return of Swearengen marks where the show starts going full bore.

The Swearengen monolgues are amazing, I think.  I thought that monologues were completely a lost art.


Reqiuem for a Gleet contained one of the most horrifying scenes ever put to film. /shudder

I missed Season 1, and started watching the first ep of Season 2 (then went and bought season 1!). I enjoyed all of them, to tell the truth. 2 has more multi-episode storylines, so I guess some of the eps can seem slow. I loved it though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 02, 2006, 10:22:58 AM
Was that horrifying episode the one where Al has to pass the kidneystone?

Yeah, that one makes me cringe now, just thinking about it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 02, 2006, 11:21:56 AM
If by "pass" you mean "have a metal rod shoved up his urethra," then yes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on June 05, 2006, 09:32:34 AM
I'm trying to figure out Justice League's episodes, but it's confusing. Justice League had 2 seasons, than the show was renamed to Justice League Unlimited and had 3 more seasons, that are not seasons 3,4 and 5 of JL, but rather 1,2 and 3 of JLU. Did I get that right?

In other news - The 4400 season 3 is starting this Sunday. Woot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 05, 2006, 10:30:35 AM
Sopranos season finale was rather anti-climactic.  It was a very good episode, but it would have been better as great mid-season episode rather than a non-cliffhanger, doom is in the air "season finale".   Waiting for 8 more emminently disappointing episodes is going to be torture.  At least I get one more year of Deadwood. Woot.

*Possible vague spoiler, SKIP IF YOU TIVO'D BIG LOVE*
Big Love season finale was great.  Cloe Sevigny can really act. The Hendrickson family is fucking screwed and seeing how they'll possibly get out of this is going to make for great TV.  Painful, but great.  It's amazing how badly they could get burnt by pissing off Roman's pre-pubescent wife to be.  That little bitch needs to die screaming (kill Roman off while you're at it, eh?).  I've got a feeling this may be a show that doesn't end up ever becoming a happy ending.
*VAGUE BUT OBVIOUS SPOILER DONE*

Gilmore Girls season finale was terrible as was much of the season.  I love how someone can set up a 5 season long love story and have it crumble in a season due to two characters all of the sudden acting differently that they have for the past five years.  A story that thrives on writing simply cannot stand being poorly written and having poorly constructed plots.  The creator (who is also the head writer) has left the show.  Either it'll get horribly worse as all of the characters will start sounding different (the dialogue in this show is rather unique) or it'll right itself and all of the sudden we'll get a "hey, sorry about last season, we know we fucked up" reversal in the current story line.  Seriously, if it pans out like it's heading, I'm going to end up garroting someone.

If I only get another half season out of Veronica Mars, I'm going to be pissed off. Best show on TV. If you watch this show and aren't hooked after a few episodes, you have no soul. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on June 05, 2006, 10:36:21 AM
I'm trying to figure out Justice League's episodes, but it's confusing. Justice League had 2 seasons, than the show was renamed to Justice League Unlimited and had 3 more seasons, that are not seasons 3,4 and 5 of JL, but rather 1,2 and 3 of JLU. Did I get that right?

Yes.

They're done by the same people, but it's set several years after Justice League was and includes a much, much more varied cast of characters.

Justice League contained only:
    * Superman
    * Batman
    * Wonder Woman
    * Flash
    * Green Lantern
    * J'onn J'onzz
    * Hawkgirl

JLU contained:
    * All of the above
    * Aquaman
    * Supergirl
    * Atom
    * Black Canary
    * Booster Gold
    * Captain Atom
    * Doctor Fate
    * Elongated Man
    * Green Arrow
    * Huntress
    * Mister Terrific (Michael Holt)
    * The Question
    * Zatanna
    * Vixen
    * Hawk
    * Dove
    * Stargirl
    * Shining Knight
    * Dr. Light
    * Fire
    * Red Tornado
    * Ice
    * Steel
    * Crimson Avenger
    * Speedy
    * S.T.R.I.P.E.
    * Vigilante
    * Rocket Red
    * Orion
    * B'wana Beast
    * Wildcat
    * Ah fuck it, here. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characters_appearing_in_Justice_League_Unlimited#Full_Roster)

Naturally, with such a huge cast each given episode featured a few particular characters.  Hawk & Dove even got their own episode, pretty much.

It's more like a spin-off of Justice League than anything, except it still contains all the original characters, and it does even resolve and hint to story arcs that happened not only in Justice League, but in other Bruce Timm DC animated shows.  For instance, there's a Batman Beyond story in there.

Cartoon Network has been screwy with this series since forever.  I can almost never catch it.  I never see any advertisments for it, and they move it all over the place in the schedule.  So I gave up, and I'm going to pick it up on DVD when it comes out.

But I have to say, it's probably my favorite comic book cartoon, even among Bruce Timm's other work.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sunbury on June 05, 2006, 10:44:15 AM

I just watched the Pilot epsiode of "Korgoth of Barbaria" on Adult Swim / Cartoon Network.  It was both hyper-violent and hilarious at the same time, esp. to DND / Fantasy fans.  Its now my favorite Adult Swim offering but won't start up until later this year.

http://media.tv.ign.com/media/829/829954/imgs_1.html


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on June 05, 2006, 10:59:10 AM
I'm trying to figure out Justice League's episodes, but it's confusing. Justice League had 2 seasons, than the show was renamed to Justice League Unlimited and had 3 more seasons, that are not seasons 3,4 and 5 of JL, but rather 1,2 and 3 of JLU. Did I get that right?
stuff

Thanks. The crappy thing is I saw JLU first, now I'll have to watch JL. Well, anyway, I'll live.

Rasix - what's that about Veronica Mars, is it going to get canceled or something? I love that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 05, 2006, 12:39:15 PM

I just watched the Pilot epsiode of "Korgoth of Barbaria" on Adult Swim / Cartoon Network.  It was both hyper-violent and hilarious at the same time, esp. to DND / Fantasy fans.  Its now my favorite Adult Swim offering but won't start up until later this year.

http://media.tv.ign.com/media/829/829954/imgs_1.html

Yeah, it was quite good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 05, 2006, 01:34:23 PM

Rasix - what's that about Veronica Mars, is it going to get canceled or something? I love that show.

Quote
Straight from the horse's mouth, Rob Thomas just e-mailed me to confirm that Veronica Mars has been renewed for a third season. The show got a 22-episode order that, depending on ratings, can be reduced to 13.

The show's always had horrible raitings despite being universally loved by TV critics and having a cult following (much like Arrested Development, Firefly, Wonderfalls.. need I go on).   I have hopes, however, that'll make the full 22.  After each season it's been doubtful that the show would even be renewed, but it still manages to carry on.  I hope they don't have to make too many concessions this season, there was quite a bit of new casting and plot direction that was an attempt to gather new viewers or that originated as a directive by someone other than the creative staff or creator.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 05, 2006, 02:27:20 PM
Am I the only one here that watches The Office, US version?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 05, 2006, 02:37:28 PM
Am I the only one here that watches The Office, US version?

Nope!  I didn't like the first season at all, it was too Steve Carrell focused.  Second season was solid gold though; they've really got a great cast and they used them all rather well.  Great season finale also (a ton of shit happened).  The office conflict resolution episode was one of the funniest things I've ever seen.

Dwight (one of his complaints against Jim, there's an entire box full of them): My phone hit me in the head.
Jim (explaining to camera): Yah, I kept adding nickels to his handset and when he got use to the weight I just removed them.

Dwight: Everytime I typed my name, it showed up as "Diapers".
Jim : Simple macro.

Dwight: At the end of my day, my desk was two feet closer to the copier. 
Jim: That one was tricky.  Everytime I got up I moved his desk a couple inches.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 05, 2006, 02:37:43 PM
I have gotten into The Office in the past few months. Still think the UK version was vastly superior, but the American version is pretty damned funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 05, 2006, 02:46:24 PM
I watch the Office US religiously. It is definitely one of the funniest things on TV, especially when coupled with My Name is Earl on the same night.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on June 05, 2006, 03:12:46 PM
I have gotten into The Office in the past few months. Still think the UK version was vastly superior, but the American version is pretty damned funny.

I'm not so sure its that pronounced. It's hard to replace Gervais, but there's some remarkable casting for the US version, and its just right for its market. Besides, I think they did the awkward office relationship (Tim/Pam rather than Gareth/Dawn) better this time round. I'd like to see Le Bureau (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0463261/).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on June 05, 2006, 05:14:23 PM
Looks like Deadwood will get a couple specials to wrap up the show (http://tv.ign.com/articles/711/711233p1.html).

Quote
Deadwood fans will be very happy to learn that there will be proper closure for the western drama, as Variety is reporting an agreement has been reached between creator David Milch and HBO to produce a pair of two-hour specials that will serve as a finale for the series. Last month HBO had decided to not renew options for the cast of the show, effectively ending the series and in the process greatly upsetting fans, and by most accounts Milch, who felt the show was being prematurely pulled; season 3 has completed production and will begin airing this month. Milch had always intended the series to run for four seasons, but HBO had grown concerned with the expensive economics of the series, which cost approximately $5 million an episode to produce, and had decided to cut the series short.

However, as we reported last week , the scrapping of the Deadwood set had been called off, as HBO worked to strike a new deal with Milch for a continuation and wrap up for the show. With Milch now in place, new deals will have to be negotiated with the cast, who will be signing for the pair of two-hour specials instead of a full season. HBO feels confident they can work out deals with all the necessary cast members of the large ensemble, which includes Timothy Olyphant and Ian McShane, in his Golden Globe winning role as Al Swearengen.

Each episode of Deadwood has taken place over just one day, but with the specials, Milch will change up that format, enabling him to cover a larger period of time for the characters than he would in normal episodes. At first HBO and Milch discussed a truncated six-episode season four, but Milch is said to prefer the two specials as a way to end his story. No word yet on when the specials will go into production or air, but season 3 of Deadwood debuts on Sunday, June 11th



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 06, 2006, 02:53:29 AM
FIVE MILLION AN EPISODE ?

How can people spend that much money making a 45 minute thing about cowboys ?



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 06, 2006, 03:08:37 AM
FIVE MILLION AN EPISODE ?

If only that other show with cowboys (err..in space) had this kind of budget. Or any budget at all, for that matter.

[edit] Production values are great in Deadwood though. I'm not surprised.

Plus it's a larger than average cast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 06, 2006, 03:25:25 AM
I watch the Office US religiously. It is definitely one of the funniest things on TV, especially when coupled with My Name is Earl on the same night.

My Name is Earl is just awesome.  A genuine treasure.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 06, 2006, 07:23:21 AM
I might look for the UK version of The Office, but the US one is really good and I don't need more TV.  I don't care for the romance portion, but of course the Jim vs Dwight stuff is top-notch.  Dwight's deadpan is one of the best I have ever seen.  The day they had badges made?  "That .. is enormous. ... I am not a security threat. ... My middle name is not 'Fart'."  One of my favorites is when Jim moves his desk into the restroom and then calls him asking for some data... Dwight's "I have given you this so many times already" or however it goes should be in a comedy textbook on how to deadpan.

The only other thing I bother to watch is Family Guy and Robot Chicken.  Waiting on Galactica and Venture.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 06, 2006, 11:01:47 AM
HBO is rerunning Season 3 of The Wire starting this Sunday. It is a great show. It helps if you've seen the first two seasons (which are on DVD and are also great) but each season has a somewhat contained storyline.

EDIT: An in that same badges ep was the classic Dwight line: "I don't smile. It's a sign of submission in primates. When someone smiles at me all I see is a chimpanzee begging for its life."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on June 06, 2006, 01:52:22 PM
(http://www.todomaipu.cl/modules/Galeria/gallery/Humor%20en%20fotos/Mascotas/chimp_smile.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lantyssa on June 07, 2006, 02:48:52 PM
FIVE MILLION AN EPISODE ?

If only that other show with cowboys (err..in space) had this kind of budget. Or any budget at all, for that matter.
It would not help when the broadcaster changes its time slot every other week and decides not to air episodes, air them out of order, or produce commercials that emphasize everything the show is not.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 12, 2006, 12:18:18 PM
WOOOHOOO! New Deadwood last night! I had forgotten how much I love this show until the ep ended last night and I was FURIOUS that I had to wait a week for another fix. All kinds of good stuff, including Bullock beating the everliving shit out of EB (which has needed to be done for 2+ seasons now).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on June 12, 2006, 12:59:03 PM
WOOOHOOO! New Deadwood last night! I had forgotten how much I love this show until the ep ended last night and I was FURIOUS that I had to wait a week for another fix. All kinds of good stuff, including Bullock beating the everliving shit out of EB (which has needed to be done for 2+ seasons now).

I also forgot how much I liked Deadwood. Its nice to watch a quality show again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on June 12, 2006, 03:25:55 PM
Anyone know what was up with Bullock fidgeting with his nose when me met with Hearst?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on June 12, 2006, 03:54:55 PM
I was wondering about that myself.  I liked the episode, it seemed to have more of a season one feel to it.  I felt like they lost their way a little bit in the second season (it was still awesome, of course).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 12, 2006, 04:51:23 PM
The nose thing was some sort of nervous tic (notice he did it when talking to his wife- who, by the way, needs a nude scene stat). I am guessing there will be some sort of further explanation for it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 25, 2006, 08:10:14 PM
With the return of Woo,  Deadwood seems to be picking up the pace.  Al is minus a finger,  Hearst insinuates rape and states that he almost decided to kill Bullock,  and the Ellsworths aren't getting along.  By the way,  the doctor appears to be coughing up large portions of his lungs. 


Did I miss Venture Bros premiere?  I was watching the repeat of Rescue Me,  when I realised Venture might be starting up again.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on June 25, 2006, 08:28:02 PM
Yes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 25, 2006, 11:24:45 PM
Random Deadwood thoughts:

I was a bit nonplused by the first two eps of Deadwood, but McRaney is really starting to elevate things.  This show is about bad guys fighting against worse guys and they seem to be getting back to that. The upcoming confrontation between Hearst and Dan looks like it might just be freaking awesome.

They can frankly jetison Joanie and Jane at this point and I wouldn't give two shits. Joanie is getting particularly pointless and lame.

Richardson is rapidly becoming my favorite character based solely on his use of antler talismen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 26, 2006, 07:58:32 AM
Did I miss Venture Bros premiere?  I was watching the repeat of Rescue Me,  when I realised Venture might be starting up again.

It's on the TiVo.  Hector took Dracula out behind the woodshed last night, so tonight is Venture Bros.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on June 26, 2006, 08:08:32 AM
Damn!  I completely forgot about Deadwood last night.  Oh well, I guess that means I can use my On Demand (which we finally got installed last week, yay!) and catch it.

Oh, and I love Richardson, too.  When he's at the midpoint of the stairs worshipping the moose and Al walks by saying, "Fuckin' pagan." I laughed my ass off.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 26, 2006, 09:31:42 AM
Did I miss Venture Bros premiere?  I was watching the repeat of Rescue Me,  when I realised Venture might be starting up again.

It's on the TiVo.  Hector took Dracula out behind the woodshed last night, so tonight is Venture Bros.

The Venture Bros. was outstanding. They plan on using more villains this season, as well as the Monarch, and I applaud this. Especially when that villain is the horribly gay King Gorilla.

"Death-prone children" - Le art.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 26, 2006, 09:34:19 AM
Random Deadwood thoughts:

I was a bit nonplused by the first two eps of Deadwood, but McRaney is really starting to elevate things.  This show is about bad guys fighting against worse guys and they seem to be getting back to that. The upcoming confrontation between Hearst and Dan looks like it might just be freaking awesome.

They can frankly jetison Joanie and Jane at this point and I wouldn't give two shits. Joanie is getting particularly pointless and lame.

Richardson is rapidly becoming my favorite character based solely on his use of antler talismen.


Interesting. I LOVED the first 2 episodes, and thought last night, while still top quality, wasn't quite as good. I completely agree about Joanie and Jane, although Joanie needs a nude scene before she goes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 26, 2006, 10:16:00 AM
It's probably my latent misogyny showing up because I really can't find myself giving a crap about any of the female characters on this show. Since the first eps had a lot of Joanie, Jane, Alma and Trixie stuff they just didn't light my fire up all that much.  The stuff in Al's place with the murders was good stuff though particularly how Hearst is now using the second incident to back off Bulllock.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on June 26, 2006, 10:33:11 AM
Interesting. I LOVED the first 2 episodes, and thought last night, while still top quality, wasn't quite as good. I completely agree about Joanie and Jane, although Joanie needs a nude scene before she goes.

I thought the second episode was the best one, with this one right on it's heels.  Hearst is coming along as a great character, worse than Al or Cy, because he doesn't indulge in any of their petty human frailties.  He's just an insanely rich, completely unscrupulous bastard whose only focus in life is "the color".  I never thought Major Dad would look so completely evil.

And yeah, the women's arcs are completely worthless.  I never liked Jane or Joanie.  Alma could be interesting considering that aside from Al and Bullock she's the only one who could really fuck up Hearst's plans.  They just need to utilize her.

ETA:  Oh, and Ellsworth needs to lay down the Papa Stick.  He's the only saint on this show, and she treats him like shit because she'd rather be banging the sheriff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 26, 2006, 11:22:20 AM
I love Jane. "Why the fuck is everyone whisperin' 'round here lately?" "Look at that, a piss puddle. Must've missed that when I planted my ass there last night."

Seems like Joanie could be an interesting character if they'd go somewhere with her instead of just having her meander aimlessly. I was hoping she was going to off Cy and take his place over or something.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on June 26, 2006, 12:24:33 PM
This season looks to be the best one yet.  Hearst is a great villain, and his "aunt" looks like an entertaining side character.  EB and Richardson have been A+.  I like Jane's comic relief and Seth is more interesting as borderline-insane.  I agree that Joanie's story has been uninspired; they need to give her something more interesting to do or less screen time.  I like her awkward relationship with Charlie and would like to see them do something with that.

I am a bit nervous that the big load of new characters in last week's episode, with at least two more minor characters from last season coming back next week, will dilute the focus of the show too much.  I thought that was the source of a lot of the problems with season 2, but I may be in the minority on that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 26, 2006, 04:47:58 PM
I can see why HBO was bitching about the Deadwood budget.  They populate the series with alot of recurring characters,  and like to sprinkle in some "name" actors.

Most TV series,  they're lucky to have one or two people you've heard of.  Most of the actors on Deadwood you can place from previous work.

And now Brian Cox joins the cast....

Deadwood is staying historically accurate in at least one thing with Hearst:  he was illiterate.  Hence the crude drawing he sent to Al.

McRaney is channeling a deeply disturbed individual with Hearst.  Barely held back from completely sociopathic behavior.  And Cy....  Cy is just as oily and conniving as you can get.

I'm a little pissed at missing Venture Bros premiere.  Looks like I'm staying up late on Thursday.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on June 26, 2006, 11:11:35 PM
Justice League is ok, but no animated show can ever do the "serious" thing like Batman the Animated Series did (the first one from the early/mid nineties, not the crappily drawn later one).  That show was just so many levels of awesome.


Title: Heroes!
Post by: Broughden on June 27, 2006, 03:30:33 AM
Let me start by saying that given our nerdish love of all things superheroish I felt this topic deserved its on thread. If the admins dont agree feel free to stick in the Television thread.


Coming to NBC this fall: Heroes (http://www.nbc.com/NBC_First_Look/Heroes/)

Just saw the first trailer/commercial tonight. You can watch it at the link above.
Initial impressions are that it looks like X-Men + Unbreakable + The 4400 combined. However given NBC's normally high production values it certianly looks better than any super hero related shows that the WB has ever released. The director is David Semel whose work includes this summer's Windfall series, the mini-series Revelations, American Dreams, and more.


(Having just found out they cancelled Surface...screw NBC. Im sure this show will get a large following, I will love it, and then NBC will cancel it and replace it with Law and Order: America's Got Fear Factor)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Broughden on June 27, 2006, 06:11:44 AM
I was thinking about necro posting the old thread. Did you guys hear that Surface was canceled? :(

WTF?!? Surface was cancelled? I hadn't been paying attention to this thread previously and just read that today. Why? That was one of my favorite new shows from that season! Damn them all to hell!

Im sure the idiots at NBC will replace it with some low cost low budget reality TV tripe.

(I googled the news about Surface and found that Invasion was cancelled as well.)

I guess NBC thinks everyone wants to watch either talent shows or reality shows because of their low production costs.  :-(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 27, 2006, 09:30:01 AM
I've heard that Heroes is decent enough to watch. Chris Ryall of Comics 101 (http://www.comics101.com/onehandclapping//?mode=project&action=view&project=One%20Hand%20Clapping&chapter=29) seemed to like it.

And yes, they'll probably shitcan it after a great season like they did with Surface. I'd like to whoop the boys that thought not renewing Surface was a good idea. That season finale was just one of the best, most exciting pieces of TV fiction I've seen in a while.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on June 27, 2006, 10:20:00 AM
I didn't realize Deadwood had started yet.  I'll have to catch up or something.

I wish they'd do something interesting with Joanie.  She's a good actress.  Jane is an interesting character; she needs something other than being the town drunk.

I can't get the idea that Bulloch is gay out of my head.  He just does not strike me as interested in women - any woman - at all.  I don't buy his heterosexual interest.  It looks too fake.

With regard to the Sopranos, I thought it was the worst season ever.  None of it was compelling to me at all.  Time to wrap it up.

Rescue Me has been great this season, although the end of last week's episode was upsetting.  I'm still puzzling over it.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 27, 2006, 11:20:30 AM
Rescue Me has been great this season, although the end of last week's episode was upsetting.  I'm still puzzling over it.

Yeah, me too. It reminds me of a rape scene in an issue of the comic Cerebus years ago. How does one sympathize with a main character who rapes his wife?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 27, 2006, 12:28:03 PM
Quote
He just does not strike me as interested in women - any woman - at all.
The scene with him and his (soon to be) wife drinking tea sitting side by side was awesome. Victorian culture ftw.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 27, 2006, 12:49:49 PM
The canceling of Surface was pretty bad. But what do you want? All of the actors were shitty. There's a reason Lake Bell was removed from Boston Legal.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on June 27, 2006, 05:12:18 PM
I'm a little pissed at missing Venture Bros premiere.  Looks like I'm staying up late on Thursday.
:heart:Or, you can get the fix. (http://www.adultswim.com/adultswimfix/index.jsp) :heart:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on June 27, 2006, 06:11:35 PM
My problem with the end of Rescue Me last week was he raped her and she got all into it. That's the stuff bad usenet groups are made of.

This season Tommy has been made to look like a complete bad-ass in very contrived ways.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 27, 2006, 09:13:55 PM
I'm a little pissed at missing Venture Bros premiere.  Looks like I'm staying up late on Thursday.
:heart:Or, you can get the fix. (http://www.adultswim.com/adultswimfix/index.jsp) :heart:

Saw that.  I'm not going to watch Venture Bros on a tiny screen.

It actually isn't staying up late with my crazy insomnia.

As for Rescue Me:

Tommy has never been a sympathetic character.  He's completely broken.  Everytime the show does something to make him sympathetic,  they've always turned around and had him be a complete asshole.

Every character on the show is a completely dysfunctional mess.

Garrity is fucking hilarious.  Especially when he and the proby start up the synergy of stupid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on June 29, 2006, 12:03:32 PM
:
As for Rescue Me:

Tommy has never been a sympathetic character.  He's completely broken.  Everytime the show does something to make him sympathetic,  they've always turned around and had him be a complete asshole.

Agreed.  Every time I start to like him he goes and does something completely fucked up and then I hate him again.  I have really started to hate Janet this season.  She's every bit as fucked up as Tommy, which I didn't exactly see before.

Quote
Every character on the show is a completely dysfunctional mess.

Garrity is fucking hilarious.  Especially when he and the proby start up the synergy of stupid.

One of the things I liked about Laura was that she wasn't completely dysfunctional.  She was a particularly nice foil for Garrity.  I would have preferred to see her and whatsisname prettyboy continue to function as coworkers after their thing was over.  Too bad she's out.

And yeah, Garrity and Proby.  Gold.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 29, 2006, 01:16:42 PM
Article about the rape scene controversy with some statements by the writer (http://www.sltrib.com/outdoors/ci_3991358)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 29, 2006, 01:30:06 PM
Article about the rape scene controversy with some statements by the writer (http://www.sltrib.com/outdoors/ci_3991358)

That confirms what I thought about the scene, that at some point, karma was going to pay back Tommy. It always seems to.

I think the scene was MEANT to make you uncomfortable and confused. The whole show should do that, considering just how much of a cocksucker most of the characters really are. That scene just happened to do nothing to really protect you from that realization, whereas most others do.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 03, 2006, 10:27:14 AM
Can I just say that I fucking  :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: Deadwood? This (last) season is going way too fast. Loved last night's episode, although I could have done without even implied sex involving Con Stapleton. The preview for next week looked AMAZING too.

Also- Holy CRAP the guy who plays Hostetler is huge. He towers over Bullock, who isn't exactly short.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on July 03, 2006, 11:00:35 AM
The preview for next week looked AMAZING too.

Yeah, I'm looking forward to the Dan vs. Captain Turner cage match.  I also expected Al to at least act a little bit more obsequious towards Hearst in that meeting, if only to lull him.  Al losing his shit strikes me as out of character.  It is nice seeing Cy so utterly playing the bitch, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 03, 2006, 11:09:49 AM
Blah...

Got a call and had to go out to dinner and drinks, so missed my TV.  I watch 3 damn TV shows and I tend to miss them.

Caught Venture Bros.  Still good.  Henchmen 21 and 24 are great.  A little disappointed that Brock got rid of the mullet,  though the giant sideburns are nice.  The interactions with the henchmen tend to be the best part of the show.

The kegger with Monarch's and Underbite's henchmen was hysterical last season.

Going to have to catch Deadwood one of the million times HBO replays it.  Like the Sopranos,  this is a show that you want to see blood in the streets and the main characters (Bullock, in particular) going on a rage-fuelled rampage.  I've pretty much come to the conclusion that the Hearst plotline is going to resolve in an akward and unfulfilling manner, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 03, 2006, 11:40:47 AM
The preview for next week looked AMAZING too.

Yeah, I'm looking forward to the Dan vs. Captain Turner cage match.  I also expected Al to at least act a little bit more obsequious towards Hearst in that meeting, if only to lull him.  Al losing his shit strikes me as out of character.  It is nice seeing Cy so utterly playing the bitch, though.

I think the blowjob soliloquy about the orphanage was telling- Al feels the same sort of impotence against Hearst as he did against the proctor who wouldn't let him join his mother, and it REALLY REALLY bothers him (even to the point of physical impotence with Dolly). Hearst sounds like he might be moving away from the camp soon since it is getting to civilized for him, so Al might get to take some measure of revenge against a few of Hearst's proxies. God I hope Dan kicks the shit out the Captain...his "Morning....great time of day to go FUCK YOURSELF!" was priceless.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on July 03, 2006, 04:28:29 PM
I just started watching Battlestar Galactica (bought the first season).  HOLY SHIT.  This is awesome!  I hope the rest the series remains this good!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 03, 2006, 04:46:30 PM
It actually gets better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on July 03, 2006, 04:50:59 PM
I am beyond impressed.  Friends have told me to watch it for awhile.  The military representation is completely spot on.  I mean reactions, how people respond, all of it.  I have an enormous erection and am only on the pilot (first?) episode!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 04, 2006, 10:47:41 AM
God I hope Dan kicks the shit out the Captain...his "Morning....great time of day to go FUCK YOURSELF!" was priceless.

Yeah, normally I'm not a big Meatloaf fan, but the Dan character just seems to bring out all the good acting ability in him. Al's impotence was very key; it's what's been keeping Hearst alive. Otherwise, he'd just have someone take care of Hearst or at least try. The "civilizing" of the camp is just as big a symbolic restraint on Al as is the attack by Hearst.

The story is working on a whole lot of levels and building to what will be a great climax.

EDIT: Battlestar does get better. There are going to be some "filler" episodes, which are still better than most things on TV nowadays. But for the most part, it just keeps ramping up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on July 04, 2006, 12:24:14 PM
Yeah, normally I'm not a big Meatloaf fan, but the Dan character just seems to bring out all the good acting ability in him.

Ummm, that's not Meatloaf.  He played Cameron Diaz' retarded brother in Something About Mary.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 04, 2006, 07:44:07 PM
I find that I am really enjoying It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.  I only just heard about it and now I am watching it on Fox, FX and my wife's Ipod.  I could have been Charlie if it wasn't for my wife's intervention, and if I had eventually developed more of a work ethic.

Venture Bros teasing with many of the rumors of what would happen in this episode was great.  It's like the writers were laughing at us.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 04, 2006, 09:13:58 PM
Alright,  Deadwood was great.  Thank god HBO replays the hell out of things.

The Bullock character is very good:  he's intelligent, principled, and surrounded by scumbags and lowlifes.  He can barely keep his anger in check.

The dog loyalty of Dan really makes him as a character.  The way he takes a child-like hurt when Al passes him over for a job.  It makes what could be a one note thug character much deeper.

What was the deal with Al and the bagman? (Can't remember his name....)  He was a buddy of Wolcott's?


I have to admit,  I watched some UFC junk on Spike.  Got sucked into a program showing Royce Gracie's old fights.  The old stuff has almost a cartoonish supervillainy air about it with guys showing up in odd costumes sporting nth degree black belts in martial arts schools you've never heard of.

Seeing Gracie make guys that outweighed him by 40-75 lbs tap out is kind of interesting. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 04, 2006, 09:18:44 PM
Old UFC is awesome, I remember watching it for free on USA.

Back then it was truly a wacky mix, there were no weight classes and MMA was not well-known. You would end up with a pure boxer, a huge wrestler, a skinny karate dude, etc.

New UFC is still good, from a technical and skill persepective it is much better, but the flavor is not the same, it's no longer the clash of styles it once was.

---

It's Always Sunny in Philidelphia is good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 04, 2006, 09:37:00 PM
Old UFC is awesome, I remember watching it for free on USA.

Back then it was truly a wacky mix, there were no weight classes and MMA was not well-known. You would end up with a pure boxer, a huge wrestler, a skinny karate dude, etc.

New UFC is still good, from a technical and skill persepective it is much better, but the flavor is not the same, it's no longer the clash of styles it once was.

---

It's Always Sunny in Philidelphia is good.

New UFC looks like they really changed the rules to give strikers a better chance.  Padding on hands means you can hit people HARD without breaking your hand (which happened quite a bit in old UFC),  and it looks like they toned down the more brutal stuff (Gracie's elbows, all kinds of groin shots, etc.)  Standing everybody up each round also gives strikers a good chance.

One of the Gracie/Shamrock fights went to time,  the ref stood them up for another 5,  and that's when Shamrock demolished Gracie's face with one punch.  It went to a draw,  but Gracie was a mess.

Old UFC was like watching a car wreck:  in a matter of seconds someone could be permanently disabled.  Most of the time, the grappler closed and then avoided shots until he could throw on an arm bar or choke hold. 

The ref reactions were great in old UFC.  They'd jump in the second someone got a disabling hold on and tapped,  or when some big bruiser finally lined up some solid hits.  Even then, they were late sometimes.  Gracie managed to break some kung fu guys arm in a matter of seconds when it looked like the kung fu guy had the advantage.

Meh...  Guess I'm just channeling my inner meathead a bit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 05, 2006, 09:11:32 AM
Yeah, normally I'm not a big Meatloaf fan, but the Dan character just seems to bring out all the good acting ability in him.

Ummm, that's not Meatloaf.  He played Cameron Diaz' retarded brother in Something About Mary.

Holy shit, you are correct (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0114868/). I have been laboring under the misapprehension that this actor was Meatloaf, when he actually played Meatloaf on that VH1 movie or something. I R DUMBASS.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 05, 2006, 09:16:12 AM
Quote
What was the deal with Al and the bagman? (Can't remember his name....)  He was a buddy of Wolcott's?

Silas Adams. He used to run with a guy named Hawkeye (who Dan beat the ever-living shit out last season- or maybe the first). Al doesn't like Hawkeye, and has apparently forbidden Adams from hanging out with him. Al wants to use Adams to act as a disloyal employee- he has been with Al the shortest time, and is probably the most intelligent of Al's henchmen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 05, 2006, 10:26:15 AM
Quote
What was the deal with Al and the bagman? (Can't remember his name....)  He was a buddy of Wolcott's?

Silas Adams. He used to run with a guy named Hawkeye (who Dan beat the ever-living shit out last season- or maybe the first). Al doesn't like Hawkeye, and has apparently forbidden Adams from hanging out with him. Al wants to use Adams to act as a disloyal employee- he has been with Al the shortest time, and is probably the most intelligent of Al's henchmen.

Ahhhh.  Al said Hawkeye and not Wolcott?  I was confused because I misheard what was said. 

 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 05, 2006, 11:14:54 AM
I don't think Al said his name- he referred to him obliquely. Adams used the name Hawkeye when he responded though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 05, 2006, 11:38:22 AM
If my memory serves, Adams was one of the bagmen for the judge that was trying to blackmail Al with the warrant back in Ohio (or wherever). Al essentially turned Adams and he helped in Al's plot against the judge. I think the latest conversation was about how he wanted Adams to act as a similar double-agent type guy with Hearst and that he could because of both his reputation and somewhat looser ties to Al.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 06, 2006, 09:01:04 PM
I posted this in the comics thread, but Blade The Series has been pretty good so far. The pilot was a bit slow but set up some stuff, the second episode was 5 times better, it was really enjoyable.

I'm a sucker for this sort of genre stuff. It reminds of the kind of stuff I loved to watch when I was a kid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 08, 2006, 03:59:43 PM
Emmy nominations are out,  and people are bitching about them already.

The big (and well deserved) news to me:  Dennis Leary got a nom for best Actor.

Other than that....   Deadwood, BSG, etc got shut out.  Surprise.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 09, 2006, 10:36:26 AM
Emmy nominations are out,  and people are bitching about them already.

The big (and well deserved) news to me:  Dennis Leary got a nom for best Actor.

About time. Did the Office get some best actor/actress nods for Jim and Pam?

Quote
Other than that....   Deadwood, BSG, etc got shut out.  Surprise.

A fucking crime.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 09, 2006, 11:31:55 AM
How does Rainn Wilson not get nominated?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 09, 2006, 11:52:20 AM
The biggest point of contention seems to be the number of nominations for L&O: SVU.  At least they could have nominated Ice T.  I love the delicious irony of the guy who made "Cop Killer" playing a TV cop.

Sopranos got alot less noms then usual, too.  The only notable one was for Michael Imperioli (Christopher),  who has really grown as an actor throughout the series.  I thought his performance in the season finale was excellent.  Nothing for Gandolfini or Falco.

People are pretty confused by Lost not even getting nominated.  It did win the Emmy last year.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on July 09, 2006, 09:27:09 PM
Latest episode of Deadwood has left me at a loss for words. Dan v. Captain "Sea Creature" Turner was worth the advanced billing.

Just a great episode, Deadwood is at its best when stuff is happening left and right.  I can even forgive the opening scene with Con Stapelton.  I'd say more, but I'd hate to spoil this episode for anyone that has it on Tivo.

edit: I want some Wu. Can we please get a little Wu?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 09, 2006, 10:00:23 PM
Re: Deadwood

Holy Fucking Shit!


That is all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 10, 2006, 12:58:36 AM
Dennis Leary does not deserve a nomination. It isn't acting if you just play yourself.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on July 10, 2006, 09:04:18 AM
I don't think that's entirely fair. Yes, there are definite moments in Rescue Me where Leary is doing a stand-up routine within a script, but there are many other instances where he acts out emotions pertaining to the script that are good, solid acting.

If on the other hand you're bewailing the horrible trend in Hollywood in general, namely, to have actors not really take on a different personality but essentially just play themselves within a story, then I agree. But if that's your beef, start a lot higher than that. Harrison Ford, Nicholas Cage, Christopher Walken, Jack Nicholson, just to name a few, simply play themselves within a script.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 10, 2006, 10:08:09 AM
Re: Deadwood

Holy Fucking Shit!


That is all.

ARRGH! Didn't get home from Cali until midnight last night, so I haven't had a chance to watch it yet. Can't wait!!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 10, 2006, 11:30:53 AM
Dennis Leary does not deserve a nomination. It isn't acting if you just play yourself.

Yeah, that really isn't fair. Sure, there's bits of himself in there, but there's also some truly good acting moments that have nothing to do with the standup. Sure, it helps that the  part is written for you by you, but you still have to pull it off and he does.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on July 10, 2006, 11:42:18 AM
Christopher Walken

In fairness, his movies wouldn't be as good if he played anyone but himself.  He is simply more entertaining that just about any fictional character out there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 10, 2006, 12:50:56 PM
Walken acted in the Deer Hunter at least...and in Joe Dirt.

Leary's character in Rescue Me is basically the same character as in Demolition Man, Suicide Kings, etc.

Chiklis and Walton Goggins both deserve a nod far more than Leary. I suppose it's bad form to nominate the same people over and over again but really. I would rate Julian (Christian Troy) from Nip/Tuck higher than Leary as well. (Truly an underrated performance) Leary isn't even close to the best male actor on his own network.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on July 10, 2006, 10:09:35 PM
Christopher Walken

In fairness, his movies wouldn't be as good if he played anyone but himself.  He is simply more entertaining that just about any fictional character out there.

Yes.

God I love Poolhall Junkies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 10, 2006, 10:19:48 PM
If you want a good Walken performance in a good movie that few people saw I would suggest Scotland, PA.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 10, 2006, 10:22:05 PM
Uh...."Acting" isn't necessarily being something than what you are, but being something other than what you feel or think. There's a difference there -- You can still essentially be "yourself" and act. People do it all the time.

Say, for example, you come to work late and your boss wants an explanation -- If you simply give him a convincing story/lie, then you are acting. If you say your lines in a way that's believable, then you're acting. It's not all funny voices and/or flashy character transformation. It's more generally about conveying things that aren't really there -- And sometimes, that's simply about fabricating emotions.


Or in other words, Christopher Walken acts all the time.

* This post brought to you by the Stella Adler School of Snobbery


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 10, 2006, 10:28:03 PM
Walken acted in the Deer Hunter at least...and in Joe Dirt.

Leary's character in Rescue Me is basically the same character as in Demolition Man, Suicide Kings, etc.

Chiklis and Walton Goggins both deserve a nod far more than Leary. I suppose it's bad form to nominate the same people over and over again but really. I would rate Julian (Christian Troy) from Nip/Tuck higher than Leary as well. (Truly an underrated performance) Leary isn't even close to the best male actor on his own network.

"Rescue Me" deserved a best drama or a writing nod.

Just the fact the show has the balls to give you characters that can do such despicable things.  There isn't a one, besides maybe Lou,  who isn't a mess.

Leary does play the same guy everytime.  I think he gets credit, though, for the way he handles the character in the "big event" things:  the death of his son,  dealing with his wife troubles, the fights with Sheila...  and what might be the most painful depiction of alcoholism going.  Sitting in his truck, chugging and wincing, and just looking mean/depressed.

There are alot of actors who deserved the nod over him, though, I agree.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on July 11, 2006, 10:17:32 AM
Uh...."Acting" isn't necessarily being something than what you are, but being something other than what you feel or think. There's a difference there -- You can still essentially be "yourself" and act. People do it all the time.

Say, for example, you come to work late and your boss wants an explanation -- If you simply give him a convincing story/lie, then you are acting. If you say your lines in a way that's believable, then you're acting. It's not all funny voices and/or flashy character transformation. It's more generally about conveying things that aren't really there -- And sometimes, that's simply about fabricating emotions.


Or in other words, Christopher Walken acts all the time.

* This post brought to you by the Stella Adler School of Snobbery

But the problem is, that's the sort of acting I can do.  And do really well.

And I'm not an actor.  So it's not impressive that someone who gets paid shitloads of money, solely to do that, can do it too.

Now becoming an entirely different person, that's impressive.  I can't do that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on July 12, 2006, 07:23:43 AM
STARGATES THIS FRIDAY. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Watched a preview thingie. Richard Dean Anderson is appearing in episodes in both atlantis and sg-1. Awesome. Can't wait. I'm a fanboi :(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on July 12, 2006, 07:26:20 AM
Any bets on Eureka?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 12, 2006, 07:32:11 AM
WOOHOO. I'm an SG fanboi, too. Been watching for so many years now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 12, 2006, 08:20:11 AM
Now becoming an entirely different person, that's impressive.

Impressive, sure.....But nobody actually does that. Actors aren't schizos. They're just liars.

Any role that calls for a little more surface decoration is still going to rely on and employ the same exact things as the "actors who play themselves". The real masks are joy, anger, pain, sadness, experience with a thing, inexperience with a thing, etc.. If an actor can't do those convincingly, then they're just an impressionist and a clown. A Rob Schneider (sorry Rob). Not an actor. Good actors are the ones who can interpret and display all the emotional/experiential subtleties of the person contained in a script, regardless if the role requires them to do it in a funny voice or not (and 9 times out of 10, there's just little room for that kind of stuff. It's not an actor's fault if they appear to be "normal").


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on July 12, 2006, 09:07:26 AM
I think there are actors out there who occasionally take on roles that are entirely different personalities from who they are commonly seen as. Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast, Charlize Theron in Monster or Brad Pitt in Snatch come to mind. Not a matter of simply acting out emotions pertaining to a character's circumstances, but adapting an entirely different person's point of view. That's the kind of acting that impresses.

Of course, you're fighting a hollywood trend that only wants roles for main characters that Joe Schmoe can empathize with, so its not often a good measure for an actor when there are so few roles that are really demanding.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 12, 2006, 09:20:20 AM
Any bets on Eureka?

It certainly looks interesting enough to Tivo.

EDIT: I finally caught the Deadwood episode. Holy fuck, that fight scene turned my stomach. Maybe it was because I dig the Dan character, or just the gruesomeness but fuck, they pulled no punches. That show continually amazes me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 12, 2006, 10:29:26 AM
Quote
I finally caught the Deadwood episode. Holy fuck, that fight scene turned my stomach. Maybe it was because I dig the Dan character, or just the gruesomeness but fuck, they pulled no punches. That show continually amazes me.

I finally caught it last night as well. WOW. The fight scene really felt REAL, and was just brutal. The rest of the episode was top notch as well. Poor Hostetler. I REALLY REALLY REALLY hope Steve does something out of line so Bullock can just shoot his ignorant racist ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: trotski on July 12, 2006, 11:05:07 AM
Agreed.  Goddamn that fight scene was amazing.  This show just continues to get better and better, not even a mediocre episode yet this season.  They have all been fantastic.  When are Joanie and Jane gonna hook it up?  :-D


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on July 12, 2006, 11:15:01 AM
When are Joanie and Jane gonna hook it up?  :-D

When they move into Joanie's new place and Jane takes a bath. This story line will be great just for the reaction it will illicit from Charlie.

My wife and I are hoping for a violent end for Steve (and a final resting place in the belly of one of Wu's pigs).  I'm somewhat amazed at how high strung Hostetler was, but one can only imagine the shit he's had to endure throughout his life.

Ohh, and the new season of Reno 911 started up.  The last scene had my wife laughing for minutes after it ended. 



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 13, 2006, 01:29:46 AM
I think there are actors out there who occasionally take on roles that are entirely different personalities from who they are commonly seen as. Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast, Charlize Theron in Monster or Brad Pitt in Snatch come to mind. Not a matter of simply acting out emotions pertaining to a character's circumstances, but adapting an entirely different person's point of view.

All of the things I mentioned are about adapting to an entirely different point of view. All good actors are displaying a different point of view other than what they have -- It's just that "different point of view" isn't always going to be so loud and externalized. Such things shouldn't be some kind of litmus test. It's not that simple.

[edit]

To further add (and this will probably better sum up what I'm trying to say here): The process and amount of preparation in creating good characters is always the same. No matter how they look in the end. The actual mechanics in the performance phase are dictacted by the character itself, and what you learned during the preparation.

But it isn't like there's a whole of group of "better" actors out there who somehow have a better use of mechanics. Any good actor can do that stuff. It's just that not every character they have an opportunity to play or are interested in playing makes use of those things all the time.

If anything, what you should be judging people on is how they approach the first phase. The bad actors are the ones who do nothing here and lack the imagination to build a character. It's either all mechanics and gags to them, or worse yet, some can't even do that. Some just say their lines and suck on both fronts.


All that being said, I haven't even seen the Dennis Leary show that originally sparked this discussion. Maybe he sucks. I don't know.  :-P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on July 15, 2006, 04:06:53 PM
We should just make a new thread so me and sky can froth about how awesome sg-1 and atlantis were :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 17, 2006, 07:15:49 AM
Holy shitballs. I liked when Sheppard referred to his stunt (latching onto the hive ship just before they went into hyperspace) "Something I saw in a movie once" Very strong shows for each series.

I'm a week behind on Deadwood, but that was a prett good episode, too. Dan vs the Cap ftw!

All hell has broken loose on all three series :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WindiaN on July 17, 2006, 11:01:52 AM
i heard the new season of weeds is supposed to come out in august, anybody else watch that show? I think the first few episodes of season one are amazing but it sort of tails off with really funny parts mixed. I'm really looking forward to the new season though!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 17, 2006, 05:22:22 PM
Venture Bros. last night cracked me up.  God, I love that show.

How are Claudia Black and Ben Browder doing on SG-1?  I loved Farscape,  but the few times I've caught the new lineup on SG-1 I'm depressed by how sane and staid they have Browder's character acting.

An intereting link to AICN on HBO programming:

http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=23840

Looks like Rome may be done.  Not surprised.  Mediocre ratings for a massively expensive program are trouble.

Big Love is back,  but can't say that it kept my interest.

Deadwood is done and the creator's next series is slotted into the lineup.  Deadwood was also supposed to be massively expensive to make.  My take is mostly that the creator wanted to head on to different projects.


Any of our Canadian friends know if/when the next season of Dr. Who is coming to a Canadian station?  I think I get most of the national Canadian stations,  so I'd love a heads up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on July 17, 2006, 05:52:03 PM
I'm not sure which show gave me a bigger chubby last nice; The Venture Bros. or Deadwood.

They were both great.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on July 17, 2006, 10:27:53 PM
I always wanted to get Poe in a headlock!  Look at that thing, it's like a pumpkin!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 18, 2006, 06:21:29 AM
Quote
How are Claudia Black and Ben Browder doing on SG-1?  I loved Farscape,  but the few times I've caught the new lineup on SG-1 I'm depressed by how sane and staid they have Browder's character acting.
Black has been great, she was given an interesting character. Maybe one of the strongest characters in the show's history. Crichton isn't bad, but he isn't real compelling, either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on July 18, 2006, 06:48:00 AM
While not current shows, they are TV shows, so I thought this would be the best place to mention.....

Carnivale Season 2, as well as the complete series of Brisco County, Jr., are supposed to be released today.  I should be picking both up pretty soon.  I loved Brisco, and I'm looking forward to watching it again.  And Carnivale was....well....Carnivale.  Shame it had to be cancelled, especially on the cliffhanger of sorts it left off with. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 18, 2006, 08:00:33 AM
That's a damn shame about Rome, and I knew the news about Deadwood. For an episode where not a lot happened, the Deadwood episode from Sunday night was just great.

Venture Bros. was great. Reassure me that I'm not on crack... there wasn't a Part One of this story, right? The voice of the guy who played Katz's son (and Coach McGirk) as Orpheus' master was just perfect.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on July 18, 2006, 08:55:03 AM
While not current shows, they are TV shows, so I thought this would be the best place to mention.....

Carnivale Season 2, as well as the complete series of Brisco County, Jr., are supposed to be released today.  I should be picking both up pretty soon.  I loved Brisco, and I'm looking forward to watching it again.

Agreed. Much man-love for Bruce Campbell.  I don't get paid until Friday, but that's why we have Credit Cards. Thanks for the heads-up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on July 18, 2006, 09:21:49 AM
Venture Bros. was great. Reassure me that I'm not on crack... there wasn't a Part One of this story, right? The voice of the guy who played Katz's son (and Coach McGirk) as Orpheus' master was just perfect.

I seem to remember something about last week's being Escape From The Mummy Temple or whatever, but I didn't watch it.  That's just what it was on my Info button.

And yeah, no one delivers deadpan like H. Jon Benjamin.  He's a riot in everything.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on July 18, 2006, 09:24:21 AM
Anybody heard anything  about Heroes?  New show on NBC Mondays starting this fall.  The premise has me queasily optimistic. I'll watch the pilot, at the least.

Here's one of about  a half dozen or so YouTube clips NBC has put up there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbR-c1rm5oM


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sauced on July 18, 2006, 10:40:35 AM
The good news about Deadwood, anyway, is that Milch (and everyone else) agreed to make 2 2-hour movies for HBO, so that'll be something.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on July 18, 2006, 11:29:42 AM
No there wasn't a part 1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Venture_Bros._episodes#Season_1:_2004)

I think the joke is that we never get to see Venture Bros. actually go on their adventures.  We only get to see small clips and left to wondering WTF! is going.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 18, 2006, 11:40:41 AM
No there wasn't a part 1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Venture_Bros._episodes#Season_1:_2004)

I think the joke is that we never get to see Venture Bros. actually go on their adventures.  We only get to see small clips and left to wondering WTF! is going.

That's exactly what I thought.

Chris Ryall of Scott Tipton's Comics 101 seemed to think Heroes was decent (http://www.comics101.com/onehandclapping//?mode=project&action=view&project=One%20Hand%20Clapping&chapter=29).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 18, 2006, 09:19:45 PM
Rescue Me continues to be pretty fucking good.

I also watched Eureka....  and it was...  uncharacteristic of Scifi's usual output.  Sort of X-files with a sense of humor, the production was good (unlike the cheeseball junk they usually serve out), and the BSG preview looked amazing.  I might actually watch it again.

Anyone here ever watch It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia??  I ask just because you get bombarded with commercials for it while watching Rescue Me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 18, 2006, 09:37:58 PM
Bah, forgot to mention:

The only reason I saw any of Eureaka was because Scifi started airing Dead Like Me tonight (pilot was tonight.)  A damn good show.  They'll have to edit down some of the language (I seem to recall that they liked saying fuck alot)....


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on July 18, 2006, 09:52:34 PM
I feel I should point out that the complete set of The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. (http://www.warnervideo.com/brisco/us/html/) was just released on DVD.  Now there was a good TV series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on July 18, 2006, 11:53:50 PM
This may be old, but the Wiki entry on 24 has some info on the next president.  Sort of interesting and something I didn't expect at all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on July 18, 2006, 11:55:59 PM
Isn't reading ahead on a show like 24 completely missing the point?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on July 18, 2006, 11:56:27 PM
Also:  Eureka was good.  I'm going to be watching in the future.  Dead Like Me: meh.  It feels to me like a show that could have been great except for some horrendous miscasting (cept its one of those situations where I can't feel out exactly who is miscasted, but I know its holding the show back).  I'll skip it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2006, 06:49:54 AM
Time Warner in this area picked up Universal HD a couple months ago, which is airing BSG in HD. Now, I'm not a big BSG fan (remember my "Heretic" grief title?), but it brings home one thing that's bothered me a long time:

I want SciFi in HD!

Mostly for Stargates, though. I think the rest of their programming sucks, especially their cheesy movies. Mansquito? WTF.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on July 19, 2006, 06:51:59 AM
Triforcer, Ellen Muth, Mandy Patinkin and whoever plays the british-ish white dude make Dead Like Me COMPLETELY worth watching. it's ont of the best shows I've ever seen. Ever.

Also, only 6 weeks or so til the new Boston Legal. Anyone else see the season finale this past May? Fucking brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 19, 2006, 08:06:43 AM
Anyone here ever watch It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia??  I ask just because you get bombarded with commercials for it while watching Rescue Me.

Yes. That show is fifteen kinds of wrong, but it's funny as fuck. It's like watching four friends from the Vault Network try to get along with intelligent society, or similarly it's like Seinfeld with cursing and no filter.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on July 19, 2006, 10:47:15 AM
I feel I should point out that the complete set of The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. (http://www.warnervideo.com/brisco/us/html/) was just released on DVD.  Now there was a good TV series.

It's also $79.95 at Best Buy.  It's a good show, but I don't know that it's $80 worth of 'good' for 27 shows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 19, 2006, 11:19:58 AM
Triforcer, Ellen Muth, Mandy Patinkin and whoever plays the british-ish white dude make Dead Like Me COMPLETELY worth watching. it's ont of the best shows I've ever seen. Ever.
Triforcer was in Dead Like Me?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 19, 2006, 12:53:44 PM
Ha ha The Adeventures of Brisco County Jr. ruled, one of the few shows my dad and I both liked.

It's Always Sunny is great, it's just so wrong all the time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on July 19, 2006, 01:43:35 PM
I feel I should point out that the complete set of The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. (http://www.warnervideo.com/brisco/us/html/) was just released on DVD.  Now there was a good TV series.

It's also $79.95 at Best Buy.  It's a good show, but I don't know that it's $80 worth of 'good' for 27 shows.

Loved that show.  Only 65 at mine, you sure they priced it right?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 19, 2006, 02:21:34 PM
I feel I should point out that the complete set of The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. (http://www.warnervideo.com/brisco/us/html/) was just released on DVD.  Now there was a good TV series.

It's also $79.95 at Best Buy.  It's a good show, but I don't know that it's $80 worth of 'good' for 27 shows.

Loved that show.  Only 65 at mine, you sure they priced it right?

Older shows with limited popularity I'll wait for it to hit the clearance rack.  Picked up The Job complete series that way for $30.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on July 19, 2006, 03:50:35 PM
Loved that show.  Only 65 at mine, you sure they priced it right?

Likely not.  This particular Best Buy has a history of pricing things wrong.  I got Stadium Arcadium for $9.99 that way.  I'll take a look someplace else over the weekend, thx for the heads-up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on July 19, 2006, 04:40:39 PM
BSG season 3 preview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_ccvhY5-I)

Holy hell.

Edit: I just clicked my own link because it's that good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 01, 2006, 07:59:16 AM
Been watching Lucky Louie on HBO. Pretty funny show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on August 01, 2006, 08:56:37 AM
BSG season 3 preview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7_ccvhY5-I)

Holy hell.

Edit: I just clicked my own link because it's that good.

Uhm, pray tell what grabbed your attention? It looked positively awful. More teenage angst with accompanied emo soundtrack.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 01, 2006, 09:00:32 AM
Uhm, pray tell what grabbed your attention? It looked positively awful. More teenage angst with accompanied emo soundtrack.
So you didn't like season 1&2 then?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on August 01, 2006, 09:14:05 AM
I liked season 2 better than season 1, but obviously not for the same reasons that the people who made the above trailer think I did.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 07, 2006, 05:54:37 AM
I don't know what it was, but last night's Venture Brothers had me laughing the whole time.  The pill-popping Johnny Quest was another nice nod & slap at its source material after last season's Race Bannon death.

 "IGNORE ME"


Metalpokalypse I'm not sure on, though. It was amusing but so hard to understand (audibly that is.) I didn't catch all the jokes.  Their fans pride over the injuries sustained and dropping the stage on the crowd gave me a good laugh, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 07, 2006, 09:07:34 AM
Venture: It's pretty clear that first season wasn't a fluke. I absolutely love how they are slowly filing in the pieces of Venture history.  I was hoping Sally would move in with Rusty for a while.  A co-dependent girlfriend would prefect for the show.

Metal: I am getting tired of the 15 min cartoons, just when you start getting interested in whats going on its over.  It worked for ATHF because there is no story, so they can just jump in.  HB:AL works because scripts are really tight.  Last night's metal was neither.  Plus the hard to hear/follow problem, it kinda sucked. But it was interesting enough that I give another look see.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on August 07, 2006, 09:24:18 AM
I do love Brendon Small, but Metal wasn't nearly as good as Home Movies to me.

I won't change the channel when it's on (like I do for some AS shows), but I won't be seeking it out or anything.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on August 08, 2006, 03:11:20 PM
In 1972 a crack commando unit was sent to Craphole Island on Oceanic Flight 815 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tni4h7kRb-k)

LOST MEETS THE A-TEAM!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 08, 2006, 04:49:57 PM
Blade: The Series kicks ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on August 09, 2006, 05:51:48 AM
I've been pleasantly surprised by Blade.  I didn't like the movies and the potential for camp seemed very high but so far the writing for the show has been solid.  I like all the political machinations; it reminds me of Vampire: The Masquerade only without all the emo angst crap.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on August 09, 2006, 03:42:01 PM
I've been pleasantly surprised by Blade.  I didn't like the movies and the potential for camp seemed very high but so far the writing for the show has been solid.  I like all the political machinations; it reminds me of Vampire: The Masquerade only without all the emo angst crap.

Someone should do a review of this show.  I had no idea there even was a Blade: Series!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 09, 2006, 03:47:55 PM
It's on a shitty channel. I keep forgetting about it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on August 09, 2006, 03:56:50 PM
It's on a shitty channel. I keep forgetting about it.

I do exactly the same thing.  I stumble across a show I like, such as Monk or that new Psych, and unless I miraculously remember to set it to record with the DVR, I forget the whole channel exists.  I've never even stumbled across this show, however.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 09, 2006, 06:15:49 PM
I'll write a review tonight!

(Springs into action)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on August 10, 2006, 12:07:36 AM
Seriously, he already wrote it.  That was some good springing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 10, 2006, 12:13:57 AM
I'm tightly coiled.

You can take that however you want. Multiple ways even.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on August 14, 2006, 12:24:28 PM
HOLY FUCKING SHIT. Last night may have been the best episode of Deadwood in all 3 seasons. If not for the ongoing annoyance of the theatre troupe subplot (which, while I love Brain Cox, is slowly killing me), and Jane's long drunken rant about her dream, it was nearly perfect. Al was in season 1 form, leaping off the balcony like fucking Batman to rescue Mrs. Ellsworth, and then later kicking the everliving shit out of the head Pinkerton and then slitting his throat. Good times.


I have also finally been ensnared by Entourage. Jeremy Piven was SO born to play Ari Gold.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on August 14, 2006, 12:37:39 PM
HOLY FUCKING SHIT. Last night may have been the best episode of Deadwood in all 3 seasons. If not for the ongoing annoyance of the theatre troupe subplot (which, while I love Brain Cox, is slowly killing me), and Jane's long drunken rant about her dream, it was nearly perfect. Al was in season 1 form, leaping off the balcony like fucking Batman to rescue Mrs. Ellsworth, and then later kicking the everliving shit out of the head Pinkerton and then slitting his throat. Good times.


I have also finally been ensnared by Entourage. Jeremy Piven was SO born to play Ari Gold.

Yes, last night's episode was buckets full of awesome and Dan Dority (W. Earl Brown) wrote it! So many great lines and scenes..

Johnny: "Longest a rug's lasted so far.."
Al: "Wu." (as to what to do with the body)
Al goading Hearst after killing the head "brick".
Hearst spitting on EB to make himself feel like a big shot again.
Alma: "I'm going to need to remove my corset."

And Bullock looked pissed. That was a look of such complete fury that it completely unnerved Sol and Martha.

Next episode looks like a "bad times" episode.  Hopefully leading to a waterfall of comeuppance for Hearst.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 14, 2006, 04:25:14 PM
HOLY FUCKING SHIT. Last night may have been the best episode of Deadwood in all 3 seasons. If not for the ongoing annoyance of the theatre troupe subplot (which, while I love Brain Cox, is slowly killing me), and Jane's long drunken rant about her dream, it was nearly perfect. Al was in season 1 form, leaping off the balcony like fucking Batman to rescue Mrs. Ellsworth, and then later kicking the everliving shit out of the head Pinkerton and then slitting his throat. Good times.


I have also finally been ensnared by Entourage. Jeremy Piven was SO born to play Ari Gold.

Yes, last night's episode was buckets full of awesome and Dan Dority (W. Earl Brown) wrote it! So many great lines and scenes..

Johnny: "Longest a rug's lasted so far.."
Al: "Wu." (as to what to do with the body)
Al goading Hearst after killing the head "brick".
Hearst spitting on EB to make himself feel like a big shot again.
Alma: "I'm going to need to remove my corset."

And Bullock looked pissed. That was a look of such complete fury that it completely unnerved Sol and Martha.

Next episode looks like a "bad times" episode.  Hopefully leading to a waterfall of comeuppance for Hearst.

W. Earl Brown (Dan Dority) played Cameron Diaz's retarded brother in "There's Something About Mary".  That kind of blew my mind.  Not as much as when I was watching some History Channel show on Roman engineering and they had Peter Weller (Robocop) on as one of the experts on Rome.....   I guess he's a part-time history lecturer at Syracuse.

Good episode of Deadwood.  Great night of TV.  I do get the feeling that the whole buildup is going to be anticlimatic.

I've been sucked into Entourage.  Piven has always been entertaining,  but Ari Gold is his niche.  He plays a sortof asshole better then anyone.

Venture Brothers was hilarious.  Brock running around naked (with appropriately placed gray square), covered in blood,  carrying around a severed head....   Trina's goth friend gets propositioned by Dr. Girlfriend to go into the supervillain business.  Hank ("sort of looks like Buddy Holly") and Dean ("looks like Fred from Scooby Doo")....


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 14, 2006, 04:34:12 PM
Oh...

The second season of "Dr. Who" is set to start playing on Scifi in late September (29th?),  at about the same time BSG makes it's return.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 14, 2006, 04:37:37 PM
Not as much as when I was watching some History Channel show on Roman engineering and they had Peter Weller (Robocop) on as one of the experts on Rome.....   I guess he's a part-time history lecturer at Syracuse.

Yeah, I saw that too.

Quote
Piven has always been entertaining,  but Ari Gold is his niche.  He plays a sortof asshole better then anyone.

He's definitely great at that, but I still can't bring myself to watch that show. That aspect of Hollywood the writers are drawing from just doesn't interest or entertain me. If the show was totally about Piven's character, and everything was done through his eyes, maybe I'd watch it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on August 14, 2006, 05:12:09 PM
That is basically how I watch it. Everything that happens all leads to Ari's reaction to it. Hell, waiting for him to explode is half the fun!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 14, 2006, 05:57:12 PM
You echoed my opinions about the theater troupe plot line exactly. I like Cox and he was good with McRainey in that scene they did together, but otherwise he could have never shown up and nothing would have changed. I really don't know where Milch is/was going with that whole thing, unless he is setting up some weird Hamlet play within a play thing with Hearst or justaposition on where Al "might have been."  Meh.


The way Al is twisting up Hearst is just a beauty to behold and I'm just waiting for Oliphant to "Go" batshit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 15, 2006, 08:34:34 AM
Deadwood was indeed a fantastic episode. The way Milch can have me laughing my ass off at the death of the Pinkerton guy is just beauty. I still don't know where the theatre troupe subplot is going, but I dig Brian Cox enough to trust him with it. Watching him chew scenery is just great. And Oliphant is just showing his acting chops to be exemplary.

Venture Bros. was one of the best of the entire series. Brock and the villains make that show, especially the Monarch. Following on the heels of last week's brouhaha with the Impossibles, which was the next best episode of the series, I hope Adult Swim did the smart thing and signed them for at least 2 more seasons after this one.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on August 15, 2006, 01:10:38 PM
Brock diving in through the bathroom window, naked and covered in blood, for some reason cracked me the hell up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on August 15, 2006, 03:45:24 PM
Been watching Lucky Louie on HBO. Pretty funny show.

Ummm...  No.

That show has single handedly pushed me far in the direction of cancelling HBO.  With them stupidly killing off a Deadwood season 4, and 2007 being the last season for Rome, I'll cancel happily.  If shit like Big Love, Entourage, and Lucky Louie (I can't emphasize enough how much I loathe that fucking show) are any indication of future programming, HBO just isn't worth the money anymore.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 15, 2006, 08:51:46 PM
Rescue Me had another solid episode.  Shit hit the fan, big time.  Some good funny parts,  but looks like a couple characters my not be returning for the next season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on August 19, 2006, 04:09:00 AM
Did anyone see SG1 last night? It had a Farscape parody in it that was hysterical.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 20, 2006, 06:54:51 PM
Ok. I've moved from being disappointed that HBO didn't do anything it could to keep Deadwood going to now being seriously fucking pissed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 20, 2006, 08:04:08 PM
Ok. I've moved from being disappointed that HBO didn't do anything it could to keep Deadwood going to now being seriously fucking pissed.

Great quotes tonight:

"Reason....  ain't his long suit"

"Woo.  Big man."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on August 20, 2006, 09:45:04 PM
Ok. I've moved from being disappointed that HBO didn't do anything it could to keep Deadwood going to now being seriously fucking pissed.

They pulled the same crap with Carnivale, and I'm not going to put up with any more.  I get jerked around enough by network TV shows, I'll be damned if I'm going to pay good money to continually get the rug pulled out from under me.  I'll be cancelling on Monday, and I'll just torrent season 2 (which has been chooped down to 10 episodes) of Rome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 20, 2006, 09:58:31 PM
Carnivale was pretty decent (and I'm a huge Clancy Brown fan) but Deadwood is on a whole different level. They should have thrown David Chase under the bus two years ago so they could have all that Sopranos money to put into shows like Deadwood.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 21, 2006, 07:40:09 AM
But....Deadwood has a huge budget as it is. Same with Rome.

People simply aren't watching them, that's all. Don't blame HBO. Hell, they were the ones who had the guts to actually make TV shows based off of ancient Rome, a traveling carnival troupe, a funeral home business, a Mormon polygamist, and the Wild West in the first place --- Which nobody else is doing. If there wasn't an HBO, you wouldn't have gotten any of it. They deserve some credit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2006, 08:21:42 AM
(and I'm a huge Clancy Brown fan)

(http://www.threemoviebuffs.com/miscreview/highlander3.jpg)
(http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/images/bb_3.jpg)
(http://www.kartelle.com/actors/spongebob/krabs/Krabs10.gif)

He and I share a birthday.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 21, 2006, 12:26:54 PM
But....Deadwood has a huge budget as it is. Same with Rome.

People simply aren't watching them, that's all. Don't blame HBO. Hell, they were the ones who had the guts to actually make TV shows based off of ancient Rome, a traveling carnival troupe, a funeral home business, a Mormon polygamist, and the Wild West in the first place --- Which nobody else is doing. If there wasn't an HBO, you wouldn't have gotten any of it. They deserve some credit.


My point being that Deadwood could have had more seasons, not that more money could be spent on it right now.  And HBO doesn't make its money on ratings, it makes it on subscriptions. Getting people into great shows only to yank them away is not a good way to ensure retention.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on August 21, 2006, 12:39:47 PM
Agreed. I was all set to cancel HBO after Deadwood was over. Then I got hooked on Entourage. I should probably just buy the DVDs after this season though; cheaper than paying $15 a month or whatever they are raping me for.


Poor Ellsworth. Didn't even get a chance to take any of Hearst's hired guns out with him. That sucked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 21, 2006, 01:08:32 PM
Yeah, I had to rewind that part of Deadwood to make sure Ellsworth got capped. That sucked, because I really loved that character. And who knows how fucking long we'll have to wait to finish the story once the season is done. They haven't specified a starting point for the movies have they?

I loved the direction on this episode, especially the closeups on E.B. and some of the shots of Al. They just fit the situation so perfectly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on August 21, 2006, 01:19:56 PM
But....Deadwood has a huge budget as it is. Same with Rome.

Ummm...? Is Rome canceled? I was wondering what the fuck happened to it... They came and shot the second season here (Bulgaria), 'cause it's cheap so I naturally assumed they were at least going to air that. Never really heard anything about it after that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on August 21, 2006, 01:46:04 PM
Ummm...? Is Rome canceled? I was wondering what the fuck happened to it... They came and shot the second season here (Bulgaria), 'cause it's cheap so I naturally assumed they were at least going to air that. Never really heard anything about it after that.

They trimmed down season 2 from the usual 12 episode allotment to 10 episodes, and it will apparently be the last season.  It also sounds like they'll have to drastically speed up the pace, because from what I hear they're planning on going all the way to when Octavian received the title of Augustus.  He was well into middle age by that point, so we're talking a timeframe of 30-40 years they're going to have to breeze through in 10 episodes.  Sure, they accelerated the timeline in season 1, but not that drastically.  So much so that they're going to have to replace Max Pirkis, because there's no way in hell he'd be able to play a man in his 30's or 40's.

I don't necessarily mind that shows get cancelled.  I do mind shows being cancelled without resolution when I'm paying a subscription to watch them.  And that's why I cancelled HBO earlier today.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 21, 2006, 02:31:28 PM
Yeah, I never understood the impetus behind the cancellation of things like Carnivale. It can't be for bad ratings, because they don't make their money off of ratings. The only thing I can figure is that someone at HBO isn't happy with the cost vs. profit from DVD sales. Rome I can understand, as it's damn expensive. I wasn't aware Deadwood cost as much but that may be because of all the talent in the cast. It's still a damn shame.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 21, 2006, 04:35:33 PM
Yeah, I never understood the impetus behind the cancellation of things like Carnivale. It can't be for bad ratings, because they don't make their money off of ratings. The only thing I can figure is that someone at HBO isn't happy with the cost vs. profit from DVD sales. Rome I can understand, as it's damn expensive. I wasn't aware Deadwood cost as much but that may be because of all the talent in the cast. It's still a damn shame.

I think it's earlier in this thread, but Deadwood is really really expensive to shoot.  Period pieces generally are,  and the huge cast on Deadwood must not help...  I remember reading something about union minimum salaries for recurring actors/"listed in credits" being fairly onerous,  which is why so many shows have a small stable of main characters with others only showing up enough for "guest" status.

HBO must have some formula they use to calculate ratings as a function of subscribers brought in....

Sopranos, despite not being as good or as popular as it used to be,  still generally dwarfs the rest of the lineup in ratings.

I put alot of the blame on the creator of Deadwood...  David Milch, right?  He knew the show was getting poor ratings for the budget,  and HBO offered him an out to close up the series (6 or 8 episode season),  and he passed.  That's more than alot of networks do....  the fact that he was pushing his surf-drama thing must not have helped him out.

For all that I like Deadwood,  you have to admit the pace of the show is glacial.  This past season,  we spent 6 or 8 episodes with barely anything happening while we had to follow a huge number of plotlines that were just not very good.  Kahn (Caan?) and whatever the hell he was doing,  Jane, way too much Steve the Drunk (reminds me of how much Sopranos focused on Vito), the ultimately pointless Ellsworth/opium/Mr. Ellsworth moving out thread, the theater troop, etc.

The show tends to suffer when they don't feature the actors that chew up the scenery....  Al, the Doctor, Bullock, Tolliver....  And many of the more entertaining minor characters were used poorly or ignored.  Udder is a pretty interesting character,  and plays well off of the mains.  Jane is better playing off of Udder the rest.  Sol Star was massively underused,  and Trixie was given not much real meat.  WOO! who disappeared for most of the season.

Spoilers

Last episode was great, don't get me wrong.  Should have known Mr. Ellsworth was going to end up dead...  every character that isn't an asshole (Al, Tolliver) or tragically flawed (Jane, Bullock, the Doctor) gets killed real fast.  I honestly expect Mrs. Bullock or Udder to buy it some time soon.

I just wish they had cut the buildup down a few episodes and kicked off the climax a couple episodes back.  Even if there was going to be a new season,  I don't see how this one could have ended on anything but an anticlimatic note.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on August 21, 2006, 11:37:01 PM
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh. They cancled SG-1 (http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/istargate_sg-1i_cancelled_iatlan.shtml).

What the fuck? And after the 200th episode which was fucking awesome.  I've been watching that for YEARS. :cry:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 22, 2006, 05:32:21 AM
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh. They cancled SG-1 (http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/istargate_sg-1i_cancelled_iatlan.shtml).

What the fuck? And after the 200th episode which was fucking awesome.  I've been watching that for YEARS. :cry:

It was only a matter of time.  I begin to think Ben Bowder really pissed some exec over at Sci-Fi off.

For a moment I thought it was the expense, then I remembered BSG which has to be much more expensive.  Wonder if that'll survive another year. 

That article mentions Sci-Fi is a top-10 cable network.  Really? The fuck? I can't tolerate anything on it anymore with the exception of BSG, am I missing something here?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 22, 2006, 06:13:47 AM
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh. They cancled SG-1 (http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/istargate_sg-1i_cancelled_iatlan.shtml).

What the fuck? And after the 200th episode which was fucking awesome.  I've been watching that for YEARS. :cry:

It was only a matter of time.  I begin to think Ben Bowder really pissed some exec over at Sci-Fi off.

For a moment I thought it was the expense, then I remembered BSG which has to be much more expensive.  Wonder if that'll survive another year. 

That article mentions Sci-Fi is a top-10 cable network.  Really? The fuck? I can't tolerate anything on it anymore with the exception of BSG, am I missing something here?

Obviously you underestimate the draw of cliched B-grade monster movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 22, 2006, 06:47:00 AM
SG-1 cancelled? Now I'm down to 3 shows on normal cable. Maybe by the time I buy a house they'll have cancelled everything I watch. One can hope. I don't see the Daily Show being cancelled any time soon, but I thought that about Stewart's great talk show.

I wish they'd cancel that shitty BSG. And every movie SciFi has ever made. Mansquito? Really?
Quote
Ironically, this is the first year since Season Four that plans were already in place, both creatively and in signed actor contracts, for another year.
And that sucks. I don't think they'll be able to close the story arcs, unless they somehow do it via cameos on SG-A.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 22, 2006, 10:41:07 AM
I was, at one time, afraid they might merge SG-1 and SG-A.  Looks more likely now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on August 22, 2006, 03:39:45 PM
Carnivale at least somewhat deserved its cancellation.  The last 4 episodes of the 2nd season were a complete mess.

I wish they'd cancel that shitty BSG.

*record-needle-screeching-off-the-track*

BSG is the best thing Sci-Fi's ever aired.  This includes shows with muppets, and belt-buckle headed aliens.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 23, 2006, 06:36:55 AM
My old grief title was 'Heathen' for my views on the BSG crapfest.

We watched the Spike Lee flick about Katrina on HBO, it was intense. There were four acts, and only act three was a little weak (Spike being Spike), the rest was required viewing for all Americans imo. Make sure the kiddies are in bed, though. Bloated bodies and f-bombs galore.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on August 27, 2006, 10:22:02 PM
That's it?!?! (http://www.hbo.com/deadwood/)

Talk about an anti-climax.  You've got 18 of Hawkeye's thugs, plus a midget who's apparently good with a knife, 150 of Wu's chung kuo motherfuckers, and a whole posse of Hearst's Pinkerton's and nothing happens?  The only body in the episode was the scapegoat whore's...  What about Sophia and Ellsworth, etc?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 27, 2006, 10:25:42 PM
BSG was a shitty political drama disguised as shitty sci-fi.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 27, 2006, 10:35:08 PM
Gonna have to agree.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on August 27, 2006, 10:37:52 PM
BSG was a shitty political drama disguised as shitty sci-fi.

IT HURTS MY EARS. I'd be amused to hear what you consider good sci-fi. It'd probably include Nic Cage in some way.

At least you can recommend a good RPG. So, you've got that going for you..


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 27, 2006, 10:39:40 PM
Good sci-fi?

Are you kidding?

On TV?

I dunno, maybe an episode or two of X-Files. The rest was awesome government drama disguised as shitty sci-fi.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 27, 2006, 11:13:32 PM
I'll try not to be too negative, but BSG doesn't contain many of elements of sci-fi that I usually gravitate towards. I've commented on it's militaristic theme before, so I won't get into that. The main reason why I don't like it is that there's just no sense of adventure, mystery, or otherwordliness to it that I tend to associate with science fiction. I don't feel like I'm being transported anywhere. The BSG world seems to be 100 times less stimulating than my own.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on August 28, 2006, 12:15:45 AM
BSG is Vampire The Masquerade IN SPAAAACE!! A notch down from Deep Space 9, and lord knows that was a pile of crap. Last decent sci-fi out there was Firefly, then before that Farscape, but even that lost steam towards the end. Even Star Trek Enterprise was a better show than BSG by far, and I refer to Enterprise as 'Teh Republican years'.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 28, 2006, 12:47:03 AM
Deep Space Nine had some of the same bleak undertones, but at least not everything was like that. It's Trek -- it can't be too unadventurous or negative, no matter how hard you try, whether you place the characters on a space station, or toss them in a galactic war. Quite a few DS9 episodes were some of the funniest things in Trek, I think. Especially this one (http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/68242.html). Any of the episodes with this guy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Combs) were always great as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xerapis on August 28, 2006, 01:11:03 AM
Please realize that shortly after I conquer this pitiful planet..

I will execute all those who dislike BSG and DS9.

You have been warned.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 28, 2006, 02:23:40 AM
See, I said I wasn't going to be negative, but now you're threatening conquest.

It's not Vampire the Masquerade in SPAAAACE. It's worse. It's part Flight 93 in SPAAAACE and part shitty Nam flick like Hamburger Hill in SPAAAACE. Sci-fi couldn't be more depressing. And boring.

Secondly, there are few portraits of the universe, life, and cultures around the characters and their war. Few moments of civilian pleasures or off duty storylines -- It's like going to a party and hearing someone talking about their job all night. It's all business and war and bad actors playing space marines.

Thirdly, no Han Solo. Fuck all of the characters in BSG. They're all sheep.

And the ladies...Man, the ladies. Every single one of them (except the robot!!) is so butch, they make Tasha Yar look like Strawberry Shortcake.

(http://online.tvguide.com/images/pgimg/Battlestar-Katee-Sackhoff6.jpg)

A cigar? Are you fucking kidding me?

You know who she reminds of?

This guy:

(http://www.canalrcn.com/images/imagenes/Williamgr)

Third Rock from the Sun is more compelling sci-fi than Battlestar Galactica.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sairon on August 28, 2006, 04:26:10 AM
BSG is one of the few sci-fi series I can bare to watch. I've seen some eps of the old school trek, and some of enterprise. I simply can't stomach it, it just gets to fucking silly once they start talking about technology. Also, unless it's comedy, I can't keep the intrest up in series where it doesn't matter if I miss 50 episodes, where there's no meaningful plot advancement at all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on August 28, 2006, 06:30:05 AM
I'm glad other people also hate BSG, it's a fucking terrible show.  I'd cite specific examples but I have blocked out almost all the memories.  The only really stupid thing I remember is the pointless parallel of the flower nuclear girl (http://www.adjab.com/2006/06/12/lyndon-johnsons-flower-girl-ad/) that got killed.  I threw out the first season DVDs I bought (which I only purchased because so many people here liked it) so that they could not be viewed again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on August 28, 2006, 07:25:22 AM
Last decent sci-fi out there was Firefly

Though I really enjoy Firefly, I have to question classifying it as sci-fi.  It happens to be set in the future, but all of the themes and plots make me classify it as a Western.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 28, 2006, 08:21:34 AM
Third Rock from the Sun is more compelling sci-fi than Battlestar Galactica.

And Starship Troopers (the book) was bad political commentary disguised as sci-fi.

Oh wait, no it wasn't. I'd really be interested to see what you think is GOOD sci-fi. BSG is great drama with a sci-fi tilt. It doesn't need "Beedeebeedebee" Twiki to make it good sci-fi.

EDIT: Good sci-fi has more to do with just having "teh futchure" or technology or alien cultures. The science/alien/tech stuff is just a prop for a good story. When it becomes the focus of the story, you have the shitties parts of Star Trek, or the Matrix.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 28, 2006, 08:28:13 AM
Last decent sci-fi out there was Firefly

Though I really enjoy Firefly, I have to question classifying it as sci-fi.  It happens to be set in the future, but all of the themes and plots make me classify it as a Western.

Western motifs, yeah, but I don't see western themes. Still looks like sci-fi to me.

Dune has elements that resemble stories containing the clash between imperial and native cultures, like the ones you'd see in Last of the Mohicans. In other places, it resembles Anna Karenina or War and Peace. In others, the Bible or Koran. The story is set 10,000 years in the future, and looks more like something from the 7th, 18th, or 19th century. There's virtual no space travel, no computers, and barely any kind of warfare outside blades and hand to hand combat. Not even Firefly is that much of a throwback to older times. And yet, Dune is considered one of the greatest (if not "the" greatest) sci-fi stories ever.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 28, 2006, 08:33:15 AM
Yay, a sci-fi definition argument. The internet loves those.

I think good sci-fi is that which is based on fictional science.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on August 28, 2006, 08:40:13 AM
Hey, I'm just trying to have a conversation with Llava. Didn't know it was going to be some big internet event.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 28, 2006, 04:19:01 PM
That's it?!?! (http://www.hbo.com/deadwood/)

Talk about an anti-climax.  You've got 18 of Hawkeye's thugs, plus a midget who's apparently good with a knife, 150 of Wu's chung kuo motherfuckers, and a whole posse of Hearst's Pinkerton's and nothing happens?  The only body in the episode was the scapegoat whore's...  What about Sophia and Ellsworth, etc?

Yah.  Fuck.  THIS IS WHY YOU GOT CANCELLED.

I mean....  You could take this season,  cut out all the useless and boring scenes and plotlines,  paste it together and have maybe 2 or 3 hours of decent TV.  And most of that would be Al and Woo. (I'm looking at you Steve the Drunk and Theater People.  Get out.)

The two redeeming moments:  Tolliver gets back to being an evil bastard,  and Al has a conversation with the indian head in the box for the first time this season.

Is Venture Bros. a new episode next week?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on August 28, 2006, 04:23:58 PM
The two redeeming moments:  Tolliver gets back to being an evil bastard,  and Al has a conversation with the indian head in the box for the first time this season.

He talked to Chief Head-in-a-box before the Dan/Sea Creature fight.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 28, 2006, 04:28:18 PM
You guys are on crack. That finale was great.  I loved how Cox was basically the Greek Chorus for the episode with his opening soliloquy and was instrumental in getting Hearst to beat feet. His character finally paid off.

Al was masterful the entire episode and Johnny finally got some balls. Utter was awesome in his confrontation with Hearst and his thug in the voting line.

What did you expect? A street war?  They always knew they were outgunned, outmanned and outmaneuvered with Hearst. The shot of Hawkeye's people was hillarious as they were so pathetic.  Rag-tag townies don't get over on someone like George Hearst.  They were always in survival mode and managed to survive. That was all they could ever hope for.  

This was filmed before it was established it wasn't coming back so of course there was no grand conclusion.  Powerful people like Hearst don't get a "comeuppance" that would make you feel all fuzzy. Hell, he died as a U.S. Senator.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 28, 2006, 04:44:49 PM
BSG is ok but I can't get into it because the pacing is just atrocious.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 28, 2006, 04:59:48 PM
You guys are on crack. That finale was great.  I loved how Cox was basically the Greek Chorus for the episode with his opening soliloquy and was instrumental in getting Hearst to beat feet. His character finally paid off.

Al was masterful the entire episode and Johnny finally got some balls. Utter was awesome in his confrontation with Hearst and his thug in the voting line.

What did you expect? A street war?  They always knew they were outgunned, outmanned and outmaneuvered with Hearst. The shot of Hawkeye's people was hilarious as they were so pathetic.  Rag-tag townies don't get over on someone like George Hearst.  They were always in survival mode and managed to survive. That was all they could ever hope for.  

This was filmed before it was established it wasn't coming back so of course there was no grand conclusion.  Powerful people like Hearst don't get a "comeuppance" that would make you feel all fuzzy. Hell, he died as a U.S. Senator.

My problem is that the "Hearst vs. town" plot was hugely watered down by the inclusion of marginal or forgettable plot threads.  The fact that the plot had to come out with Hearst winning meant that you had a...  18 or 20 episode buildup over the course of 2 years for nothing, because of the way the last few episodes were handled.

If you can never use the threat of violence/extermination, then the characters behavior becomes unbelievable posturing for the camera.  If you wanted to emphasize that "surviving=win" then you needed to stress and pile on the characters' vulnerabilities, desperation, slim chances, etc.

If you're going to have a anti-climatic winddown that proves that plot/story is unimportant,  you better have some great characters with interesting and witty interactions.  Season 1 & 2 had the characters and the interactions,  season 3.... not so good.





Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 28, 2006, 10:26:43 PM
I disagree that it was anticlimactic. It is more that the characters we rooted for essentially lost, which makes it more of a tragic ending. The final shot of Al scrubbing his floor, literally with the blood of the innocent on his hands was pretty powerful if you ask me.

I also disagree that there was a lack of good/witty character interaction, but that is likely more personal taste/opinion.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on August 31, 2006, 05:11:43 AM
BattleStar Galactica news:

September 5th "webisodes" will air.  Evidently they will be through www.scifi.com/pulse/ , 10 episodes total, and will feature events between the second and third series.  Also, a new series is currently in development.  It is titled "Caprica" and will take place 50 years before the current episodes.

My fan boi meter just blew!



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 31, 2006, 05:32:07 AM
Great. Another series. I bet it'll be awesome like Atlantis. Or Lone Gunmen.

In GOOD tv news, new episode of House next week. Also, Grey's Anatomy. I expect Heroes to air in a week or so as well, but whether or not that's good TV or a Colors of Benetton ad in disguise is yet to be seen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on August 31, 2006, 05:35:08 AM
Great. Another series. I bet it'll be awesome like Atlantis. Or Lone Gunmen.

In GOOD tv news, new episode of House next week. Also, Grey's Anatomy. I expect Heroes to air in a week or so as well, but whether or not that's good TV or a Colors of Benetton ad in disguise is yet to be seen.

Whats with the negativity lately?  You getting all gothic on us?  I think you just need a hug!

Greys Anatomy.  <snicker>


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 31, 2006, 05:38:25 AM
What negativity? If it's directed to television sci-fi, WoW, or UO MMOGs - I can't really say it counts. So I ask! What negativity?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on August 31, 2006, 05:43:13 AM
Did they air the pilot of Heroes or was it some leak or something like that? Anyway, it was boring, dull and uninspired.

House  :heart:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on August 31, 2006, 08:47:52 AM
House is to Grey's Anatomy as Hill Street Blues is to Dukes of Hazzard mang.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 31, 2006, 09:23:48 AM
I think Heroes isn't until the 25th of Sept.

About the Deadwood finale, I don't think it was so anticlimatic as it was not meant to be the ending. They didn't discover it was the last regular show until after it was done. As a setup for season 4, I thought it worked fine. Had it been the last thing ever, it would have been galling.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Simond on September 01, 2006, 07:56:28 AM
Speaking of sci-fi on telly: Kirk shot first! (http://trekmovie.com/2006/08/28/star-trek-tos-gets-redone-with-new-cgi/)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 01, 2006, 08:38:49 AM
I also have my reservations about a BSG spinoff.  BSG is (was?) great, but unless the writers have so much extra energy that they can devote it to another series, it's just going to be Typical TV Writers and end up being the DS9 of this universe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 01, 2006, 08:39:44 AM
it's just going to be Typical TV Writers and end up being the DS9 of this universe.

You mean superior to the show it spun off from in every way except ratings?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 01, 2006, 08:41:22 AM
it's just going to be Typical TV Writers and end up being the DS9 of this universe.

You mean superior to the show it spun off from in every way except ratings?

I can't have a coherent discussion with anyone who likes DS9.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 01, 2006, 08:43:09 AM
DS9 was a decent show, and actually went beyond the "solve all problems with completely made-up tech terms" formula that TNG fell back on. Better characters (mostly), better plots, better everything.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 01, 2006, 11:25:26 AM
DS9 got going once they changed Commander Sisko into Captain Hawk and they gave him a cool ship.  They still should have given him a big-ass chrome .45 though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on September 01, 2006, 10:26:07 PM
DS9 was a decent show, and actually went beyond the "solve all problems with completely made-up tech terms" formula that TNG fell back on. Better characters (mostly), better plots, better everything.

REVERSE POLARITY, DAMMIT!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 01, 2006, 11:50:51 PM
About the Deadwood finale, I don't think it was so anticlimatic as it was not meant to be the ending. They didn't discover it was the last regular show until after it was done. As a setup for season 4, I thought it worked fine. Had it been the last thing ever, it would have been galling.

It's a major problem with the series' tempo if they're slow playing the plot to stretch out through multiple seasons/years at a glacial pace without any kind of intermediary plots or resolutions.  If you're a casual viewer,  or if you just don't bother to rewatch old episodes,  you start missing important details from 2-3 years ago that are being dragged out as plot devices currently. 

It's a good way to turn a decent or entertaining series with a continuing storyline into a self-referential circle jerk that alienates the casual viewer.  Look at the last few seasons of X-files, for instance.  I used to watch that show off and on until about the 5th or 6th season when you couldn't tell who was dead or not, and what exactly the sides/plot lines were, etc. without keeping a journal.

I had no clue for a while who the hell Hawkeye was, before folks here reminded me he was Adams old partner from season 2.  And all of a sudden in the last 2 or 3 episodes he became an important figure that got referred to a bunch. 

After seeing season 3 in it's entirety,  I don't have much of a problem with the cancellation.  Obviously, HBO had issues with Milch's pacing and lack of intermediate storylines/resolutions.  The original HBO offer of 6 or 8 episodes in season 4 to wrap up the series would have meant Milch could have parsed out the filler storylines (theater group; anything with Kahn & Tolliver's flunkies; cut back the EB/Richardson stuff, the Joanie/Jane stuff, the Joanie/Tolliver stuff, the Steve the Drunk stuff, the fire engine, the Aunt Lou stuff, etc.) while finishing the main conflicts.

The secondary/tertiary plots are good in small doses,  but the amount of time devoted to some of them was amazing.

Season 2 was better,  with the intermediate plot involving Wolcott that resolved in the last episode while at the same time setting up the season 3 conflict with Hearst.  Season 2 just felt more focused.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 02, 2006, 01:47:41 PM
Sounds like DS9 where often times the irrelevant subplot would be the main point of the episode.

DS9 as originally conceived had a huge problem in that without a ship they can't really have any adventures other than people invading the space station, which seemed to happen an awful lot in the first few seasons.

In TNG you can fly to some new planet and have wacky adventures, in DS9 the adventures have to come to you.

---

I also had a real problem when they introduced the Dominion and the episode where the Enterprise-class ship gets destroyed. The entire thing seemed really stupid, send a giant ship with hundreds of crew on it to rescue one guy or something like that. I forget the exact details but I remember it being really contrived in that it was some of the dumbest tactics ever. Risk our biggest and best ship with hundreds of crew when we are clearly getting our asses kicked...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 03, 2006, 10:51:53 AM
What's with "Tourgasm" anyways? I never heard of Dane Cook before, but the audience attendance at his stand-up shows are like rock concerts. Some of these are like arena sized venues. Thousands of people surrounding a center stage with this guy telling half-assed Seinfeld meets Fratboy jokes. And they don't laugh at him -- They scream. They go freaking wild everytime the guy opens his mouth.

And apparently, he's a good and popular enough comedian to have an HBO series that documents the "behind the scenes" of his tour, but not the actual stand-up routine. According to HBO, he's so good that I shouldn't really have to hear his jokes at all.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 03, 2006, 10:56:28 AM
The actual concert is on HBO tomorrow night.  Here's an interesting take on him:

http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/review/2006/09/03/dane_cook/


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 03, 2006, 11:26:15 AM
Amazing. I could have probably written that same article word for word. Must be some "shared experience" thing for people who don't like Dane Cook, in the same way Cook shares complete and utter bullshit with his audience.


Though I would disagree on the point that HBO is forsaking other interests. They've also been good to Bill Maher (something like 4 specials, as well as the fantastic Bill Maher Show). He is everything Dane Cook is not.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 03, 2006, 02:58:40 PM
I remember hearing about Dane Cook recently and I thought to myself "is that the same guy they show of 4 year old repeats of premium blend on Comedy Central who does the routine about the ex-girlfriend from Aliens? WTF!"

His "humor" is horrible. I think he just plays to the college crowd who go for "the experience" more than any real value. I was really confused when I started hearing about how popular he is now, since he's just a jobber with zero talent.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on September 03, 2006, 07:33:25 PM
You guys are full of shit.

Standup comedy is one of the things I'm really into, and I have a lot of it.  Dane Cook, while overrated, is a funny guy most of the time.  He's no Mitch Hedberg or Patton Oswalt, but he's a funny fucking guy.  If you can't see that, you're too old for comedy.

As he goes more and more blue, I feel his act gets weaker, and I wish he'd turn it around and start doing stuff like he did on his half hour special for Comedy Central.  That was him at his best- funny in the same way that Robot Chicken is funny.  "Dangerous If Swallowed" was a good performance, but "Retaliation", while it had some classic moments, was definitely weaker.

Are his jokes political or philosophical?  Fuck no.  He's just up there making people laugh.  If you can't get into that, you've made comedy too complicated.

Most of the press surrounding him, though, is because he's a good looking and young guy, and there really aren't any of those in comedy.  Women want to fuck him.  He gets groupies.  That's pretty unique.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 03, 2006, 08:19:17 PM
If you can't see that, you're too old for comedy.

What does that mean really? I don't understand.

Whatever it means, the guy is 5 years older than me. And I'm probably just 5 years older than you.

Granted, I didn't go to college and fratboys come in second on my hate list, but that really doesn't matter. I'm quite capable of being entertained by people of all walks of life. Hell, my favorite comedian ever is a British transvestite who does a big bulk of his act entirely in French -- Without translation at that. And I still find it hilarious. Carlin, Maher, and Penn Gillette are rabid atheists, more or less, while I'm a Christian, and I love those guys. I have every single Richard Pryor album -- and he's a dead black man who once lit himself on fire smoking crack. I have little in common with him either.

Rita freakin' Rudner is funnier than Dane Cook.

I'm really that unimpressed by him. I would barely even call him a comedian, let alone a funny one. I'd like to think that he's just the fortunate beneficiary of stupid friends in high places. Or that he sold his soul to Tony Robbins. I don't know.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 03, 2006, 08:24:30 PM
Dane Cook really isn't that funny.

Neither is Mitch Hedberg really. For that matter, drug jokes never did it for me unless they came from George Carlin.

It's not a matter of being too old for comedy. It's a matter of not laughing at shitty jokes.

Dane Cook is kinda like Battlestar Galactica.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on September 03, 2006, 11:23:01 PM
The thing is, Dane Cook got really popular when Comedy Central aired his half hour special and everyone who saw it made a big deal out of it.  He's in my top 5 for those, easily.  And this happened before he got really famous.  I hadn't heard of him, I saw the special, I made an effort to remember his name and check him out more.  If I got into him then, is it so unbelievable to imagine that other people just agreed with me?  Given that he's been doing standup since the early 90's, is it hard to imagine that he's refined a style that, while it might not appeal to you specifically, appeals to a lot of people?  Because it doesn't appeal to you specifically, does that make him untalented and unfunny?

And it has nothing to do with hating fratboys.  I hate them with the white hot passion of the sun, but I still like Dane Cook.

Him, Dimitri Martin, Mitch Hedberg, Dwayne Kennedy, and Brian Posehn all had fantastic specials that made me want to learn more.

Unfortunately, Dane Cook is undergoing what happened with Ron White- he's getting more exposure than he has material.  Ron White just kept throwing out the same jokes that worked before, and Dane Cook is hastily trying to make up more jokes, with limited success in my opinion but it's selling so more power to him.

Is he as amazing as people are treating him?  No, not really.  But he was good enough to stand out.

(Schild's opinion doesn't count.  The only things in the world he seems to think are funny are Family Guy, "GENTLEMEN... MORE CORN!" and that horrifying Hulk comic.)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 03, 2006, 11:36:38 PM
You have to admit his incredible popularity is pretty silly. The guy is not any funnier than 100 other comics. He just appeals to the right demographics.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on September 03, 2006, 11:55:36 PM
The extreme popularity he has is excessive, yes, as I've said.  But he's good enough to stand out among the crowd.

(Forgot to mention Todd Glass in the list of comedians above.  But he's only really strong when he's making fun of standup comedy cliches.  "My dad was always in the wrong business.  Like we'd call the plumber, '$100 for plumbing? I must be in the wrong business!' Or at a restaurant, '$7 for a hamburger? I must be in the wrong business!' One time I heard him haggling with a hooker, '$20 for a handjob? I must be in the wrong business!' And I keep doing the bit over and over and over.")

Neither is as good as Demetri Martin, though. (http://youtube.com/watch?v=GydbEUAA5Mg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 05, 2006, 06:42:34 AM
Quote
Dane Cook, while overrated, is a funny guy most of the time.  He's no Mitch Hedberg or Patton Oswalt, but he's a funny fucking guy.
Man, that show Patton was doing about his tour was pretty good. Except that Zack douche that my girlfriend labelled the 'comedy dementor' (instead of sucking out life like a dementor, he sucked out the funny). Patton and Brian just sitting around laughing about how geeky they are is funnier than Cook imo.

I know taste is subjective, but I don't know how you can't like Mitch. My girlfriend doesn't like drug humor at all and has to laugh when he's on, because he was hilarious. Sure, he's no Carlin....but Carlin is no Carlin anymore. Got too bitter after the FCC battle imo.

I wondered where I recognized Martin's name, from the Daily Show, one of the few shows I watched not cancelled this year. I'm really going to miss Rob Cordry, he was comedy gold. Whenever I see a Hummer I think of 'Cut to my hooptie' and him driving from the back of the Hummer to the front in a compact car.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2006, 07:16:31 AM
"The Comedians of Comedy" was the name of Patton's special. Yeah, that was pretty funny.


I liked Mitch Hedberg. I don't see him as a "stoner" act so much as I do a "Stoner Steven Wright" act. And Steven Wright is hilarious. The stoner part of Mitch was just a brand of delivery. Sometimes funny in itself, but not the actual gimmick.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on September 05, 2006, 08:12:52 AM
The subject matter of his jokes infrequently deal with drugs.

"I like an escalator, because an escalator can never break.  It can only become stairs.  There will never be an 'Escalator Out Of Order' sign.  Only 'Escalator, Temporarily Stairs.... Sorry For The Convenience'."

I'm surprised you don't like Zach Galifianakis (http://youtube.com/watch?v=OvX3hzYaRmg).  His style is similar to Mitch's, just minus the stoner tone of voice and slightly more absurd.  The first three minutes or so are a bit weak, but once he starts doing his characters I crack up, and most of the jokes with his piano are gold.  I didn't get to see all of Comedians of Comedy, unfortunately, so I didn't get an impression of him on that, just from his half hour special.

Patton Oswalt had a special previous to Comedians of Comedy, just a standard half hour (maybe an hour, can't remember) standup performance.  His Facts About Midgets are priceless.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 05, 2006, 08:20:22 AM
(Schild's opinion doesn't count. The only things in the world he seems to think are funny are Family Guy, "GENTLEMEN... MORE CORN!" and that horrifying Hulk comic.)

Come now. That's not even remotely all that I find funny. But let's just take a long look at the comics discussed here.

If we were to make a tiered list, would it look something like this?

A. Robin Williams, George Carlin, Bill Cosby, Seinfeld, Richard Pryor, etc.
B. Jon Stewart, Lewis Black, Dave Chapelle, Chris Rock, Pauly Shore's Dad, Stephen Wright etc.
C. Everyone else.

I know. That list is entirely unfair. I gerrymandered it. No one has the balls to drop Chapelle in the same category as Cosby. No one is going to say Stewart is a better satirist than Carlin (though he may be, but Carlin had a much better vocabulary being a linguist and all - also, Stewart is kind of a pussy). And most certainly Hedberg, Cook and the like are not going to be placed in the second category because - while they may write their own jokes - none of them are completely original. And none of them are even remotely near as funny as say Chappele or Black when they're "on."

That said, what a bunch of third tier fucking predictable daytime comedy hacks. Keke.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on September 05, 2006, 08:48:24 AM
Come now. That's not even remotely all that I find funny.

I know,  I'm just being a smartass because you don't like Futurama or the Simpsons and I don't understand that, but whenever I've been around you you're laughing most of the time so you definitely find something funny.

By the way, I changed my avatar to St. Augustine in reference to us going to Austin.  Still available are Stone Cold Steve Austin, Austin Powers, The $6million Man Steve Austin, and way more I'm not thinking about.  But no one's going to do this but me, are they?  Hrmph.  Fine, I'll just be the only cool one then.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on September 05, 2006, 09:13:09 AM
also, Stewart is kind of a pussy).

Uhm, what? Not to rush to some patriotic defense of Stewart, but at least he's ruffled enough political feathers to get news media coverage. Can't say the same for anyone else on that list.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2006, 09:29:37 AM
By the way, I changed my avatar to St. Augustine in reference to us going to Austin.

Heh?

I thought I knew a lot about Augustine....Didn't realize Austin was short for it. And I'm ashamed that an atheist did.

Anyhow, I could meet up with you guys, y'know. If you dare.

[edit]

Speaking of Texas and Comedians:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNzQEQjfYog (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNzQEQjfYog)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 05, 2006, 01:58:29 PM
DS9 got going once they changed Commander Sisko into Captain Hawk and they gave him a cool ship.  They still should have given him a big-ass chrome .45 though.

You know what, you are probably right.  I think my problem was that I started watching it from the start, before TNG went away, whereupon DS9 magically got better.  Not better enough for me to give a shit about Emotionless Alien #3 and O'Brien's marital issues with his shrew, and I really felt no compassion for how hard it must be to be a single father in charge of a space station.

Hedberg was funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on September 05, 2006, 02:38:15 PM
I thought I knew a lot about Augustine....Didn't realize Austin was short for it. And I'm ashamed that an atheist did.

I think he's confused with Florida (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Augustine%2C_Florida). I've linked Old Three Hundred (http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/OO/umo1.html) before, it's this guy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_F._Austin)'s doing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 05, 2006, 02:49:14 PM
Yeah, I knew Austin was named after Stephen F., but apparently, the "Austin" name itself is a shortened/Anglicized? version of Augustine.

There was a St. Augustine of Canterbury some 200 years after the original St. Augustine of Hippo. Somewhere along the line, the Canterbury guy became known as "St. Austin". Either for linguistical reasons or to differentiate from the original Augustine. Could be the same deal that happened with "St. Anselm". There's the original St. Anselm of Canterbury (widely known for the Ontological argument), and another St. Anselm -- Who's better known as St. Elmo (patron saint of Muppets and shitty Rob Lowe flicks).

Also, the monastic sect known as the "Augustine friars" is also called the "Austin friars".



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on September 05, 2006, 04:49:34 PM
Yes, that's the etymology - from the old French contraction Aousten of the Latin Augustine. But it's a bit of a jump to throw in the old Hippo as the source of Austin. You could as well choose Octavian.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on September 05, 2006, 06:56:29 PM
You give me way too much credit.

I went to Wikipedia.

I looked up 'Austin'.

I picked one of the options listed on the disambiguation page.

I liked this better than the others one I recognized.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on September 05, 2006, 07:33:01 PM
Just limit an image search. (http://images.google.com/images?q=austin+-texas+-tx&hl=en&btnG=Search+Images) But, yeah, nice cleric.

(http://austinhealey.com/gallery/3003/falawn.jpg)

(http://www.austingtr.com/images/products/AU850N_large.jpg)

(http://www.netglimse.com/images/celebs/bio/sn_deniseaustin.jpg)

My favorite was the universal air chest. Oh, its the one below.


[ Edit: removed image link for password protected page: ]

http://www.austinorgans.com/images/logo-new.gif


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 06, 2006, 06:14:02 AM
I think you've invented a new term. We've all heard of airheads, but the new class of airheads, the botoxed and blimp-chested versions...airchests. I like it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on September 06, 2006, 07:17:07 AM
Or airthreads.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on September 06, 2006, 07:50:22 AM
I'm a big Deadwood fan, but they did have an unwieldy number of characters for what they were trying to do.  The actors, for example.  I know the point is to show that Deadwood is becoming a real town.  And Giving Al a friend to play off of was a useful device.  But why spend so much screen time with the other actors and their relationships?  I just wasn't feeling it.  Then you have perfectly interesting characters like Joni and Tolliver who just kind of didn't get used much at all for the first half of the season (Joni) or all of it (Toliver) except for forced scenes here and there that amount to little more than "remember this is a character, we might use him/her again sometime so we don't want you to forget him/her."

The one thing that really bothered me was how every single female character on the show turned into a weepy, irrational coward by the end of the season.  Calamity Jane spent most of the season cowering from Tolliver and avoiding getting involved in the brewing battle between the town and Hearst.  SHE'S GODDAMN CALAMITY JANE.  CALAMITY.  Not "shrinking violet Jane."  If Utter was going to plug some deserving jackasses, she'd be there.  The same is true of Trixie, who was portrayed as pretty clever for two seasons and then suddenly loses her head, takes off her shirt (of course!) and shoots Hearts with a pop-gun in the least vulnerable spot imaginable, and then collapses into a sobbing heap.  That's just not the Trixie I've grown to know and love for the past two seasons.

Still a great show, just those two things got on my nerves.  Looking forward to the two 2-hour episodes to see how they finish it up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 06, 2006, 09:26:59 AM
I agree with what you said. I think they wasted the entire interlude with Tolliver and the preacher. And Joni was traipsing through the plotline like she wanted to do something, but just farted around to no avail. I didn't mind the Steve plot too much, but it just seems the whole season meandered way too much and wasted a lot of good potential. Maybe it's a good thing it got cancelled.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 06, 2006, 09:53:24 PM
DS9 got going once they changed Commander Sisko into Captain Hawk and they gave him a cool ship.  They still should have given him a big-ass chrome .45 though.

You know what, you are probably right.  I think my problem was that I started watching it from the start, before TNG went away, whereupon DS9 magically got better.  Not better enough for me to give a shit about Emotionless Alien #3 and O'Brien's marital issues with his shrew, and I really felt no compassion for how hard it must be to be a single father in charge of a space station.

Hedberg was funny.

Was that a Hedberg gag?  If so, I unknowingly channeled him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 08, 2006, 05:30:35 PM
Was that a Hedberg gag?  If so, I unknowingly channeled him.

No, I am just too lazy to quote people.  My wife hates how I start talking about something without giving context, but that's just who I am.

Nice avatar, just when I think you've gotten a super lawyer avatar, you find one that is superer.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 08, 2006, 06:21:56 PM
Quote
Nice avatar, just when I think you've gotten a super lawyer avatar, you find one that is superer.

Heh. Thanks. For some reason while I was arguing with some people online (not here) that sketch popped into my head. It is one of my all-time faves. I have a special place in my heart for Cirroc, but Nathan Thurm fits my view of lawyerdom at the moment.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on September 08, 2006, 06:37:25 PM
For the Brits - you lucky bastards:

BBC4 TV Stiff Weekend  schedule

BBC FOUR Week 37 / 2006       
Friday 15 Sep

21:00 Ian Dury On My Life - 60mins Stiff Night   
22:00 If It Ain't Stiff Part 1 - 45mins 1 of 2 Stiff Night   
22:45 Stiff At The BBC Part 1 - 30mins 1 of 2 Stiff Night   
23:15 2nd House:So You Wanna Be A Rock'n'roll Star - 80 mins Stiff Night   
00:35 The History of the Pub - Time Shift - 40mins Stiff Night   
01:15 If It Ain't Stiff Part 1 - 45mins Repeat                     
02:00 Stiff At The BBC Part 1 - 30mins Repeat

BBC FOUR Week 38 / 2006
Saturday 16 Sep

21:00 Stiff At The BBC Part 2 - 60mins 2 of 2  Stiff Night 2 
22:00 If It Ain't Stiff  Part 2 - 45mins 2 of 2  Stiff Night 2 
22:45 Young Guns Go For It: Madness - 40mins Stiff Night 2 
23:25 Shane Macgowan: The Great Hunger - 60mins Stiff Night 2 
00:25 Son Of The Stiff Tour Movie - 50mins Stiff Night 2 
01:15 If It Ain't Stiff  Part 2 - 45mins Repeat                   
02:00 Stiff At The BBC Part 2 - 60mins Repeat               

But hopefully I'll be able to get torrents somewhere. :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 09, 2006, 11:00:16 PM
Just a reminder that The Wire starts a new season tonight (Sun) on HBO. If you haven't watched this show you are missing out. Although there are recurring characters/plotlines from previous seasons they tend to be rather self-contained stories each season.  However, if you miss episodes you will get lost quickly so hop on board with the premier.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on September 10, 2006, 12:15:09 AM
The Wire is possibly the best television show of the last 3 years, with the possible exception of Monk, which is so different a category that its hard to compare. By best, I mean better than the Sopranos, better than any CSI, including Vegas and yes, dare I say it, its better than Deadwood. It makes NYPD Blue look like quaint amateur theatrics.

I envy those people who have never seen it, that they get to see the whole 3 seasons on DVD whenever they please! I want to go back in time, or have my memories deleted so I can see it again. I just finished the 3rd season and I have been down about it, since now I have to wait at least a year for the 4th season to come out on DVD (I don't own a television, I rent all tv shows).

Don't ask what its about, because the topic, wiretapping drug crime bosses in Baltimore, doesn't adequately capture its art. Just warning, tho, the 1st season starts a bit slow, much like Deadwood did.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 10, 2006, 05:16:24 PM
Pink is singing "I hate myself for loving you" with modified lyrics to introduce NFL on NBC.

I can't decide if this is amusing or the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 10, 2006, 06:34:39 PM
Watched Heroes last night.

Liked it. A lot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 10, 2006, 06:44:50 PM
Pink is singing "I hate myself for loving you" with modified lyrics to introduce NFL on NBC.

I can't decide if this is amusing or the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life.

Can't it be both?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 10, 2006, 08:29:36 PM
It can and it was.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 10, 2006, 08:55:45 PM
The Wire is possibly the best television show of the last 3 years, with the possible exception of Monk, which is so different a category that its hard to compare. By best, I mean better than the Sopranos, better than any CSI, including Vegas and yes, dare I say it, its better than Deadwood. It makes NYPD Blue look like quaint amateur theatrics.

I envy those people who have never seen it, that they get to see the whole 3 seasons on DVD whenever they please! I want to go back in time, or have my memories deleted so I can see it again. I just finished the 3rd season and I have been down about it, since now I have to wait at least a year for the 4th season to come out on DVD (I don't own a television, I rent all tv shows).

That's how I feel about The Shield and Rescue Me - which in my opinion are the best shows on television today, maybe ever.

Rescue Me did not disappoint this year - I think it gets better each season.  And I'm so very looking forward to The Shield again.  I've not yet caught The Wire, but I set it up for TiVo.  Need to rent the previous 3 seasons also.

Started watching House, which is compelling.  Wish it was on an edgier network - like FX or HBO.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on September 10, 2006, 09:04:43 PM
You know, I totally forgot about The Shield and Rescue Me. They come in close seconds to the Wire. The Wire is just a few hairs better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 11, 2006, 10:00:14 AM
Watched Heroes last night.

Liked it. A lot.

Ah crap. I forgot to set the TiVo. Are they going to replay the pilot any time soon?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on September 11, 2006, 12:08:27 PM
The show premiers on the 25th of September.  I'm assuming you've missed nothing you won't eventually see. 



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 11, 2006, 01:02:50 PM
I like Rescue Me and it has sustained levels of brilliance but it can also be worthless melodrama.  That we now apparently have to have AT LEAST two tragedies happen at the end of every season is wearing a bit thin on me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 11, 2006, 03:51:00 PM
Rescue Me is about halfway between The Shield and Nip/Tuck.

Nip/Tuck is all melodrama and I can watch it for what it is, a male-oriented soap opera. The Shield is serious.

Resuce Me kind of annoys me because it tries to toe that line without really deciding to be either. I can't take the serious parts seriously.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on September 11, 2006, 04:36:50 PM
Heh, the Wire makes the Shield look like casual viewing. Don't get me wrong, I lust after both, but with the Wire, I've found myself saying to myself, "I'm not emotionally ready to deal with an episode of the Wire today". It can be dark dark dark, without any glamor or glossing over the horrors of poverty and drug use.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 11, 2006, 04:40:45 PM
If I ever manage to get a position teaching public administration I am going to include The Wire in my curriculum.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 12, 2006, 09:27:05 AM
Re: The Wire - Checked my local video store for season 1.  It was checked out.  TiVo'ing season whatever it is now, though.

Should I wait until I'm up to sequence?  Does it matter?

Re: Heroes - is that now on, or is that premiering Sept. 25?  I'm confused.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 12, 2006, 09:29:35 AM
It's premiering Sept. 25th, but there is a version of the pilot out on BitTorrent sites now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on September 12, 2006, 09:40:43 AM
Re: The Wire - Checked my local video store for season 1.  It was checked out.  TiVo'ing season whatever it is now, though.

Should I wait until I'm up to sequence?  Does it matter?

I'd have to say yes, its worth waiting, simply for the enjoyment factor. The new season will give away a lot of surprises in the first 3 seasons. In this series, main characters die when you least expect it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on September 12, 2006, 02:10:39 PM
The Wire always kills off my favorite characters :(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on September 13, 2006, 09:12:23 AM
Well, here's a site with a breakdown of the Fall Preview:

http://www.bullz-eye.com/television_reviews/fall_preview/2006/home.htm (http://www.bullz-eye.com/television_reviews/fall_preview/2006/home.htm)

My take on a few of these shows:

Brothers and Sisters - don't see myself watching this, it's about quirky grownup family life supposedly. Arrested Development already did that in a better, more insane fashion.
The Knights of Prosperity - I just can't see a show about robbing Mick Jagger having legs.
Help me, Help you - God, Ted Danson looks really really old now. Please go away and stop pissing on my memories of you in Cheers.
The Nine - It's supposedly about what happens to people after a hostage standoff, but you don't actually see the standoff when the show starts. Thanks, but I don't need another LOST trying to fill in the gaps of characters' lives.
Ugly Betty - whoever greenlighted this estrogen-fest should be personally dragged out into the street and shot.
The Class - it sounds like a Friends clone
Smith - great actors, but the premise of a man with a double-life trying to get in one last job before he goes straight? That's really cliche at this point.
Shark - It's got James Woods, it's worth checking out for that alone.
Jericho - yeah it's like LOST meets The Stand, no more clones please.
Vanished - I simply don't care where she went or anything about this show.
Standoff - I keep waiting for Ron Livingston to ask the hostages if they got the memo on TPS reports.
Justice - it's like Law & Order, except meaner.
'Til Death - it could go either way. The premise of two married couples in completely different periods of their marriage is solid, but if the writing isn't sharp it would go from a scathing comedic analysis of American marriage to sheer stupidity.
Heroes - comic book geeks across the US will overload the internet on this one with both the good, bad, and extremely nerdy.
Studio 60 - Matthew Perry in a deadpan comedy role. If you like him, and you like making fun of SNL, this would work.
Friday Night Lights - please, God, no more glorifying Texas Football. I lived it, I went to school in Texas, and it's a pathetic crock of shit. We shouldn't be diefying these rednecks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on September 13, 2006, 09:22:15 AM
'Til Death - it could go either way. The premise of two married couples in completely different periods of their marriage is solid, but if the writing isn't sharp it would go from a scathing comedic analysis of American marriage to sheer stupidity.

I watched the first episode and couldn't get into it. I don't even recall laughing.  I never liked the guy from Raymond, though (Perhaps because I despised that show.  Hand in your balls, Ray, oh wait your mom & wife have them.)  and I keep seeing the young guy and want to yell "Shitbrick"  or wait for him to hit on the older woman.

The show after it - Happy Hour - has gotten very little press and was pretty good. (Smalltown boy dumped by his Hot hometown girl once they're in the city.  He moves in with a Bachelor whose just lost his bacheloring buddy to a shrewish controlling woman.)    Perhaps because the alcoholic drifter lead reminds me of a guy I knew in college, but I found it to be a much better show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 13, 2006, 05:04:52 PM
The series premiere of Men in Trees was on last night and I caught part of it. It looks like Northern Exposure meets Sex in the City  -- i.e. cliched already and they are just getting started. I like Anne Heche when she plays comedic roles, though, so I may watch a few of them.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 14, 2006, 10:09:23 AM
_Standoff_  had an excellent premiere, which in the second show became just another show.  I'm so disappointed; it had great potential - not to mention some of my favorite watchable actors lately (Gina Torres/Ron Livingston/Rosemarie DeWitt), and now it's normal drek.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on September 14, 2006, 02:42:05 PM
_Standoff_  had an excellent premiere, which in the second show became just another show.  I'm so disappointed; it had great potential - not to mention some of my favorite watchable actors lately (Gina Torres/Ron Livingston/Rosemarie DeWitt), and now it's normal drek.



My thoughts exactly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 15, 2006, 08:18:56 AM
I missed the premiere of Standoff, but watched the second episode last night. I liked it well enough, so the pilot must have been really good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 18, 2006, 09:24:48 AM
Universal HD is putting on a couple of scifi shows, they're just wrapping up season 1 of BSG. It's not too bad, but I'm still not that thrilled with it. I'm just an HD whore and it's a SciFi show in HD. Wish they'd start SG1 from season 1 in HD!

Sunday the 24th starts BSG season 2 plus Firefly. Just saw Serenity, which was very enjoyable, so I'm looking forward to Firefly.

Anyone watch Supernova over the summer? I like that it showcased rock talent, and I'm glad Dilana didn't win and get stuck playing with crappy Supernova :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on September 18, 2006, 10:03:51 AM
Here is my list of things to add to my DVR. Ones marked with * are my girlfriends shows, and ones marked with a ? and shows I wanted to check out.

Nip/Tuck (FX) Sept. 5
Cops (Fox) Sept. 9
Survivor (CBS) Sept. 14
CSI: Miami (CBS) Sept. 18
CSI (CBS) Sept. 21
Office (NBC) Sept. 21
* Without A Trace Sept. 24
? Heros (NBC) Sept. 25
America’s Funniest Home Videos (ABC) Oct. 1
Lost (ABC) Oct. 4
* South Park (CC) Oct. 4
Rome (HBO) Jan. 7
The Shield (FX) Jan. 9
* American Idol (Fox) Jan. 16

I hope heros turns out good, I like the xmen rip off theme.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on September 18, 2006, 10:24:20 AM
Here is my list of things to add to my DVR. Ones marked with * are my girlfriends shows, and ones marked with a ? and shows I wanted to check out.

Nip/Tuck (FX) Sept. 5
Cops (Fox) Sept. 9
Survivor (CBS) Sept. 14
CSI: Miami (CBS) Sept. 18
CSI (CBS) Sept. 21
Office (NBC) Sept. 21
* Without A Trace Sept. 24
? Heros (NBC) Sept. 25
America’s Funniest Home Videos (ABC) Oct. 1
Lost (ABC) Oct. 4
* South Park (CC) Oct. 4
Rome (HBO) Jan. 7
The Shield (FX) Jan. 9
* American Idol (Fox) Jan. 16

I hope heros turns out good, I like the xmen rip off theme.

Your girlfriend likes South Park and you don't?  Without knowing either of you, you don't deserve her.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 18, 2006, 10:30:44 AM
Quote
Cops (Fox) Sept. 9


I had no idea this was still on, or that anyone still watches it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on September 18, 2006, 11:02:09 AM
Here is my list of things to add to my DVR. Ones marked with * are my girlfriends shows, and ones marked with a ? and shows I wanted to check out.

Lost (ABC) Oct. 4
I loved the first season of Lost but the second started really badly, I stopped watching about five episodes in.  Did it ever get better?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 18, 2006, 11:13:08 AM
If the pilot is any indication, Heroes is worth watching.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 18, 2006, 01:02:52 PM
I love the DVR version of America's Funniest Home Videos. It's about 20 minutes long.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on September 18, 2006, 10:07:20 PM
Here is my list of things to add to my DVR. Ones marked with * are my girlfriends shows, and ones marked with a ? and shows I wanted to check out.

Lost (ABC) Oct. 4
I loved the first season of Lost but the second started really badly, I stopped watching about five episodes in.  Did it ever get better?

The short answer is yes. The long answer is not until the last 4 episodes. So, the long and short is if you took an average, it ended up meh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 19, 2006, 09:30:39 AM
I thought season 2 was great.  Any ep where Eko or Locke had a big role kicked ass.  Plus, more Clancy Brown!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on September 19, 2006, 09:35:43 AM
I agree and I like season 2 more because it feels like it is going some place.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: trotski on September 19, 2006, 10:22:15 AM
Anyone see the premiere of 'Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip'?

I really enjoyed it.  Good pace to the show, Sorkin writing is never horrible, and I like the parallels to real events (i.e. one character's drug addiction, like Sorkin). Anyway if you haven't seen it, I highly recommend it.

I think Perry and Whitford will make a good team, hopefully they keep up the momentum.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on September 19, 2006, 10:28:56 AM
Your girlfriend likes South Park and you don't?  Without knowing either of you, you don't deserve her.

I like South Park, but not enough to add it to my DVR list. For me its more of a watch it when its on and I have time show.


Quote
Cops (Fox) Sept. 9

I had no idea this was still on, or that anyone still watches it.

I love watching Cops. I get a kick out of seeing the white trash people.


I love the DVR version of America's Funniest Home Videos. It's about 20 minutes long.

Yeah. Also, it makes me feel old when I get excited about AFV. But since the new host took over the show has been much better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 19, 2006, 10:38:33 AM
Surprised _House_ didn't make your list.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on September 19, 2006, 11:19:51 AM
Surprised _House_ didn't make your list.


I cant stand House. Every episode I saw was exactually the same. Some patient comes in with a wierd problem no one can figure out, and then House figures it out on a hunch with no real evidence, then he has to go against the hospital and the family of the patent to administer treatment that saves the patent just in time. Blah.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 19, 2006, 11:52:13 AM
Quote
But since the new host took over the show has been much better.
Fast forwarding past that dopey new host is partly why it's so short for us :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 19, 2006, 12:16:34 PM
I haven't given much of a chance to any TV series outside the HBO ones in awhile, but I'll probably watch Smith tonight. A criminal/heist show with Ray Liotta and Virginia Madsen has to be good, right?

Also, as a sidenote, Bruce McCullough, of all people, recently directed a comedy with Liotta in it. Not sure when it's being released though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on September 19, 2006, 12:34:15 PM
Quote
But since the new host took over the show has been much better.
Fast forwarding past that dopey new host is partly why it's so short for us :)

Yeah, but its the host who does the voice overs also. The new guy mostly lets the videos be funny for themselves. The last guy tried to *make* all the videos funny with wierd voices and stupid shit. If you watch one of the older shows now, its painful compaired to the newer ones.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 19, 2006, 05:04:14 PM
Anyone see the premiere of 'Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip'?
Yeah I saw it. Has promise. I thought they were trying too hard with the dialog. The odd thing about the show is that it's supposed to be about an SNL-type show but there was very little humor -- i.e. it's a drama about a comedy show. The next episode may be better in that regard.

Quote
I really enjoyed it.  Good pace to the show, Sorkin writing is never horrible, and I like the parallels to real events (i.e. one character's drug addiction, like Sorkin). Anyway if you haven't seen it, I highly recommend it.
Matthew Perry was addicted to Vicodin in RL as well.

Quote
I think Perry and Whitford will make a good team, hopefully they keep up the momentum.
Yeah they do make a good team -- it definitely feels like they've been buddies for a long time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 19, 2006, 05:07:29 PM
Studio 60 will be good shit. I enjoyed it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 19, 2006, 05:31:40 PM
Surprised _House_ didn't make your list.
I cant stand House. Every episode I saw was exactually the same. Some patient comes in with a wierd problem no one can figure out, and then House figures it out on a hunch with no real evidence,
I understand what you are saying but I see it more like Sherlock Holmes' "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." They have all the symptoms so they do have evidence but after they rule out all the conventional diagnoses all that remains is the improbable one.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 19, 2006, 07:13:10 PM
Surprised _House_ didn't make your list.


I cant stand House. Every episode I saw was exactually the same. Some patient comes in with a wierd problem no one can figure out, and then House figures it out on a hunch with no real evidence, then he has to go against the hospital and the family of the patent to administer treatment that saves the patent just in time. Blah.

Heh.  Every episode, my husband says, "I bet it's caused by a tick!"



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 19, 2006, 07:16:25 PM
I love House.

We blame Epstein Bar syndrome when every episode starts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 20, 2006, 06:19:50 AM
I love House.

We blame Epstein Bar syndrome when every episode starts.
(http://www.roberthegyes.com/kotter9.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on September 20, 2006, 07:43:49 AM
Funny, when I watch house I'm always thinking it's a fun game of "Find the Tumor."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on September 20, 2006, 08:02:05 AM
Copper.  Watched two episodes of House in a row where the problem was Copper.

You'd think they'd pace it better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 20, 2006, 08:03:46 AM
House isn't about the illnesses, or the mystery. House is about watching these characters grow through shit in the context of the diseases. House could be about sewage workers trying to find the dead alligator corpses clogging up the toilets of everyone in New Jersey, and it'd still be a fantastic show, because the actors are fantastic and the writing is crisp and consistent. It's also one of those shows that if you only watch it once, and out of order, you'll be missing all the context that makes it worth watching and it will just look like "disease of the week" TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on September 20, 2006, 08:06:11 AM
You know my feelings on House.  It's awesome.  But the point still stands - Pacing of the problems could be better.

And some of them are really and truly awfully disturbing.

(Favourite Episode was the Lecture Hall One.)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 20, 2006, 08:09:41 AM
The pacing of the illnesses on House are just an artifact of the format. If there were any sort of sense applied to them, each one would stretch across several shows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on September 20, 2006, 08:57:45 AM
Just caught Smith and Studio 60, both were decent and worth a watch.

Smith reminds me of Heat which is always good and I'm interested in where the characters are going.  Also makes me wonder whatever happened to that show Thief.

Edit: The Wire ruins all other cop shows.  Be careful if you watch it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 20, 2006, 09:29:47 AM
Caught Studio 60 last night on TiVo. I really liked it (but I have a hetero man-crush on Aaron Sorkin, so that was to be expected). The casting was mostly good, but I couldn't get over the fact that Amanda Peet appears to have 10-15 extra teeth in her head. Chandler and Josh Lyman look like they will make a good team. I hope they get a chance to bring Judd Hirsch back at some point- I liked his character a lot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 20, 2006, 11:17:00 AM
Just caught Smith and Studio 60, both were decent and worth a watch.

Smith reminds me of Heat which is always good and I'm interested in where the characters are going.  Also makes me wonder whatever happened to that show Thief.

It got shitcanned after the first season finale.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 20, 2006, 02:13:16 PM
I like the premise/concept of Smith. However, the instant I heard "from the Producer of The West Wing and ER" I instantly abandoned all hope. Not sure I will bother to even check it out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 20, 2006, 03:19:18 PM
Thief didn't live up to it's promise for me.  Started off great, then fell apart.  I don't know what happened; it's as if they got a whole new team of people or something behind the scenes.

I won't miss it but I hope to see the actors again in other interesting shows.  They were great; just not given much cohesion.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on September 21, 2006, 08:31:38 AM
If the pilot is any indication, Heroes is worth watching.

Friend had taped it and I watched it last night. Much better then I anticipated.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 28, 2006, 04:40:08 PM
Heroes definitely has some potential, but it might take a while to get there. Too many characters, too little exposition to tell me wtf was going on. I don't get Ali Larter's power at all (other than to be continually cast as a hot girl when she is actually a butterface). Is it a split personality? Does she have a ghost twin that fucks people up?

All in all I still found it intriguing enough to Season Pass it. God bless TiVo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 29, 2006, 07:25:47 AM
I dunno, I didn't like Heroes much. I'm going to give it another shot and DVR it next week, but it's On Notice. I'm glad Universal HD picked up Firefly, that's a good show. They're going to air the Dickey Betts show on HDNet again, for those that have that channel. His band smokes, and he's upgraded his second guitar player (on tour, not in this show) to Andy Aledort, the guitar magazine guy. The Stargate cliffhangers leading to the season ends were both great, I can't believe they'll cancel SG-1 now that it's back in full swing. Ah, well.

Dwight got a hooker!  :-D


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 29, 2006, 10:11:33 AM
Quote
Dwight got a hooker! 


LMAO! I wish that was a one hour episode- so much more they could have done with that situation, Michael's 'party', and the rest of the convention.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 03, 2006, 11:52:46 AM
Dwight got a hooker!  :-D

Heh... pretty much the only thing I watch now is The Office and Venture Bros.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 03, 2006, 12:04:59 PM
S60 was solid again last night. Amanda Peet is slowly growing on me in her role, and I think Steven Weber is great playing a corporate stooge. Once we get to know the characters better it will really be fun.

TiVo'ed Heroes, but haven't had time to watch it yet. Still have high hopes...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on October 03, 2006, 01:22:47 PM
Heroes was very good last night.  Writing looks good so far.

Speaking of good writing, it seems that Blade isn't going to be renewed for a second season.  I guess Spike TV couldn't find any room in their schedule for a well written show, what with the eleventy billion CSI reruns they play every single night.

Has anyone seen Smith?  The description makes it sound like it's a rehash of Thief, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.  Haven't had a chance to watch it yet though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 03, 2006, 02:44:57 PM
Blade got shitcanned? Bit of a shame considering the cliffhanger they left it on. But really, it wasn't a show about Blade, it was a show about a bunch of vampires that happened to have Blade in it. And it was more like Blade-lite than actual Blade. Or Blade 3-era Blade.

I finally caught the season(series) finale to Thief the other night. That show started with a good bit of promise, but the wheels really came off in the end. The whole subplot with the daughter was interesting on paper, but it just seemed to get in the way of the story rather than deepen it. The same goes for the Chinese assassin subplot, especially when he kills his boss. If the whole point of his pursuit of the main character was to save face for Uncle Lau, why kill him or his annoying nephew?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 03, 2006, 09:28:53 PM
That sucks about Blade. Maybe sci-fi will pick it up or something like that.

They really blew it with the pilot, which was terrible compared to other episodes. It was nice to have a fresh genre-fiction voice amongst the Stargates and Whedon-projects of the world.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 03, 2006, 10:45:53 PM
S60 was solid again last night. Amanda Peet is slowly growing on me in her role, and I think Steven Weber is great playing a corporate stooge. Once we get to know the characters better it will really be fun.
Enjoy it while it lasts, it's sinking fast in the ratings. My problem with the show is that it's not nearly as well cast as The West Wing was. Matthew Perry, Bradley Whitford, Amanda Peet and Steven Weber are all good but all the cast members are incredibly uninteresting including, sadly, D.L. Hughley.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on October 03, 2006, 10:55:12 PM
http://hughley.ytmnsfw.com/


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 04, 2006, 09:34:43 AM
Over the weekend I discovered that SciFi is now showing the Tenant episodes of Doctor Who, and of course I have removed the thingy from my Tivo since it seemed to want to continue recording the Eccleston episodes... dammit.  Now I will have to either wait until they start showing them again or torrent them.  Bleh, I guess it's Torrent Time for me.  And BSG starts up again this week, no?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 04, 2006, 10:06:54 AM
S60 was solid again last night. Amanda Peet is slowly growing on me in her role, and I think Steven Weber is great playing a corporate stooge. Once we get to know the characters better it will really be fun.
Enjoy it while it lasts, it's sinking fast in the ratings. My problem with the show is that it's not nearly as well cast as The West Wing was. Matthew Perry, Bradley Whitford, Amanda Peet and Steven Weber are all good but all the cast members are incredibly uninteresting including, sadly, D.L. Hughley.


Yep. Seems America isn't as interested in being smugly told how bad TV is as I am  :evil:

Watched the 2nd ep of Heroes. Wow. That is some dark shit. It is kind of giving me a Lost feel, in that they feel the need to show several minutes of scenes from previous episodes to catch everyone up. Hope that doesn't continue- that just bugs the hell out of me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 04, 2006, 12:35:11 PM
Heroes was real good. I imagine they are probably going to continue with the "previously on" type of scenes, because the continuity is going to get pretty complex. There are what, 7 major characters, each with a set of minor characters who have their own subplots, as well as the "villain." That's going to be a lot to catch up on for a new viewer.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 04, 2006, 12:54:25 PM
The resemblance to the Lost format wise is striking.  We have come a long way since Babylon 5.  If I like a show, I don't mind recaps.  It is better than the episodic format.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 04, 2006, 01:24:32 PM
Heroes is nothing like Lost. Lost had no clue where it was going. Just when it couldn't get more ridiculous, it raised the bar. Heroes on the other hand seems to know EXACTLY what it's doing. There are multiple, very clear and very present dangers. They come in the form of 2 supervillains and 1 g-man. The groups and their motives are well-defined. Also, they've created the ULTIMATE storyline character. You have a guy who can jump Into The Future. That's right. He sets up the story arcs. He's Spoiler Man, he tells you how it's gonna be, and it's fucking brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 04, 2006, 01:51:57 PM
Well, and the painter guy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 04, 2006, 04:56:09 PM
Best shows on TV right now:

1.) Weeds
2.) Gray's Anatomy


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 04, 2006, 05:11:41 PM
Best shows on TV right now:

1.) Weeds
2.) Gray's Anatomy


I have heard good things about Weeds. If the show was called Izzie's Anatomy and was on HBO (to provide numerous glimpses of said anatomy), I would be far more interested.  :heart: Katherine Heigl...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 04, 2006, 05:48:37 PM
The resemblance to the Lost format wise is striking.  We have come a long way since Babylon 5.  If I like a show, I don't mind recaps.  It is better than the episodic format.

Storyline driven TV in a 22 or 26 episode format sucks.  Catching a show every week becomes a necessity,  rather than a joy,  and the storyline tends to get either MASSIVELY dragged out (Firefly, most Whedon stuff)  or so convoluted that it's impenetrable as the run progresses(X-files seasons 5+).

I refuse to watch anything with an ongoing storyline of more than 13 episodes in a season.  Rome, Sopranos, Rescue Me, etc.  all tend to have ongoing stories,  and wrap them up well and on time. 

Deadwood would have been in that last group if season 3 didn't seem to drag it's feet so much.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 05, 2006, 02:16:45 AM
Heroes is great. I'm sticking with it.



Until it gets canceled, of course.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 05, 2006, 01:02:27 PM
Best shows on TV right now:

1.) Weeds
2.) Gray's Anatomy


No, it really isn't. Grey's Anatomy is just ER with more sex and less medical stuff. It's painful to watch. You want a good medical drama? Watch House.

Also, Eureka's season finale was last night and it was damn good. That show has consistently been pretty brilliant and if Sci-Fi fucks it over, they deserve to be trampled by Sodomites.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on October 05, 2006, 01:33:05 PM
Also, Eureka's season finale was last night and it was damn good. That show has consistently been pretty brilliant and if Sci-Fi fucks it over, they deserve to be trampled by Sodomites.

I've only ever seen the premiere episode of Eureka and that season finale and I liked em both.  Hell if sci-fi decides to actually show the rest on rerun, instead of all the bug-of-the-week-movies-crap, then I will definately watch them. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 05, 2006, 06:58:04 PM
Also, Eureka's season finale was last night and it was damn good. That show has consistently been pretty brilliant and if Sci-Fi fucks it over, they deserve to be trampled by Sodomites.

I've only ever seen the premiere episode of Eureka and that season finale and I liked em both.  Hell if sci-fi decides to actually show the rest on rerun, instead of all the bug-of-the-week-movies-crap, then I will definately watch them. 

I've been watching it occasionally.  It's Northern Exposure meets X-Files, and a pretty good show.  My life is too stressful at the moment to do much else.

Wiki link:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_(TV_series)

According to Wiki,  it's picked up for a second season as well as being broadcast in the UK.  I vote for an Ironwood review!

Edit:  Bah,  get to the end of the wiki story after writing this and they make the Northern Exposure comparison.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 05, 2006, 11:08:31 PM

I have heard good things about Weeds. If the show was called Izzie's Anatomy and was on HBO (to provide numerous glimpses of said anatomy), I would be far more interested.  :heart: Katherine Heigl...

I couldn't agree more. I've loved her ever since she was in that movie on the Disney Channel. Mmmmmm...



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 05, 2006, 11:39:10 PM
I'm liking Shark.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 06, 2006, 12:12:47 PM
I want to work in Jim's new Office, though I'd get them to play BF2 instead of CoD.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on October 06, 2006, 12:25:58 PM
I want to work in Jim's new Office, though I'd get them to play BF2 instead of CoD.
Crappy work computers could probably only handle CoD.

I think The Office is the only program I actually bother to watch on TV, I'll watch My Name is Earl but mainly because it comes on before The Office.

That was a great episode.  Him running around trying to kill people with the smoke grenade, the emergency meeting, getting yelled at for spawning as a sniper, heh.

Coworker "Why did you do that!?"
Jim "I'm just trying to kill the Germans."
Coworker "WE'RE THE GERMANS, SHOOT THE BRITISH."
Jim "We're on teams?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 06, 2006, 07:31:45 PM
Smith is gone. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061007/tv_nm/smith_dc)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 06, 2006, 08:18:02 PM
BSG was awesome.. and then they ruined part of it in the 'this season on BSG' trailer.   :-(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 06, 2006, 08:29:21 PM
James Woods rules so there is a limit to how bad Shark can be. Hell I'll even watch John Carpenter's Vampires.

How many movies has Woods been in where he wasn't the best actor by far?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 06, 2006, 09:19:34 PM
How many movies has Woods been in where he wasn't the best actor by far?

Casino maybe? And even then, I'm not sure about that. At the very least, he was just as good as Pesci and De Niro. None of them were as good as Sharon Stone.


Anyways, I like him too. Didn't realize he was in a new show.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 07, 2006, 07:02:56 AM

  I vote for an Ironwood review!


I wanted to see this, but have managed to miss EVERY SINGLE EPISODE so far.  And it's been on for a while.

I guess I'd have to do something about that to do a review.

Or I could just assume I'd hate it like the rest of existence.

:P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 07, 2006, 06:50:15 PM
I want to work in Jim's new Office, though I'd get them to play BF2 instead of CoD.
Crappy work computers could probably only handle CoD.

I think The Office is the only program I actually bother to watch on TV, I'll watch My Name is Earl but mainly because it comes on before The Office.

That was a great episode.  Him running around trying to kill people with the smoke grenade, the emergency meeting, getting yelled at for spawning as a sniper, heh.

Coworker "Why did you do that!?"
Jim "I'm just trying to kill the Germans."
Coworker "WE'RE THE GERMANS, SHOOT THE BRITISH."
Jim "We're on teams?"

I laughed so hard during that sequence, my fiance seriously thinks I am retarded now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 08, 2006, 12:18:24 AM
After catching up with the premier I had on DVR I can firmly say without reservation that BSG is robot fucking Jesus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 08, 2006, 02:11:13 AM
Hi.

Is there a show that started this year where the moon has exploded?


Don't do a search for that. You'll regret it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 08, 2006, 04:22:13 AM
Don't diss Space 1999 bitchcakes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 08, 2006, 08:11:12 PM
New best Venture Bros. ever!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 08, 2006, 08:31:40 PM
BSG was awesome.. and then they ruined part of it in the 'this season on BSG' trailer.   :-(

OH YEAH, WHAT THE FUCK?!  Jesus.  God damn them.  Way to screw it up, jackoffs.  Still, BSG gets eleven thumbs-up.

The Call of Duty section of The Office was, alone, approximately as game-funny as the entire Southpark WoW episode.  Hell, just the part where his boss called the emergency meeting was as game-funny as anything.

Moon exploding?  What?
(http://www.thundarr.com/thundarr/trio.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 09, 2006, 01:12:23 AM
BSG was awesome.. and then they ruined part of it in the 'this season on BSG' trailer.   :-(

OH YEAH, WHAT THE FUCK?!  Jesus.  God damn them.  Way to screw it up, jackoffs.  Still, BSG gets eleven thumbs-up.

The Call of Duty section of The Office was, alone, approximately as game-funny as the entire Southpark WoW episode.  Hell, just the part where his boss called the emergency meeting was as game-funny as anything.


The meeting part was awesome. On an unrelated note, I decided to set up a season pass for Heroes today, have I already missed too much?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 09, 2006, 01:54:37 AM
Download the torrents of the first two episodes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 09, 2006, 08:54:40 AM
Considering torrenting Heroes as well.  But I have some Doctor Who to catch up on, and Final Fantasy VII isn't going to play itself.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 09, 2006, 08:57:03 AM
Download the torrents of the first two episodes.

Yes. Heroes is going to be heavily continuity dependent, and if you haven't caught it from the first episode, you'll miss a lot. But it's worth it to find the episodes. Do it now.

BSG was fucking awesome. They pulled it off. I thought for sure advancing the timeline like that would fuck them up, but it's actually freed them to do some interesting stories. I was a bit disappointed in the overly-obvious references to current events (suicide bombings, torture, etc.) as I felt they were a bit too heavy-handed. But other than that, a great start. The whole Kara stepford wife thing was freaky.

Bones continues to be fantastic. I was worried about the change in directors, as I liked the old guy, but the new chick has a different dynamic that hasn't screwed up the show, just pushed some relationships in different directions.

I may be in the minority here now, but I still think Lost is pulling off a good season.

Also, watch the Nine. I was skeptical of the show and don't know if they can pull off a full season, but I liked the pilot a lot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 09, 2006, 09:00:06 AM
The whole Kara stepford wife thing was freaky.

It's about one hundred times more freaky if you have a child.  Just saying.

I'm fine with the social commentary, that's the purview of sci-fi after all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 09, 2006, 09:10:24 AM
I'm fine with the social commentary, that's the purview of sci-fi after all.

I agree, I just thought they were a bit heavy-handed with it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 09, 2006, 09:17:25 AM

Bones continues to be fantastic. I was worried about the change in directors, as I liked the old guy, but the new chick has a different dynamic that hasn't screwed up the show, just pushed some relationships in different directions.

What ?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 09, 2006, 10:30:45 AM

Bones continues to be fantastic. I was worried about the change in directors, as I liked the old guy, but the new chick has a different dynamic that hasn't screwed up the show, just pushed some relationships in different directions.

What ?

They removed one of the characters, the head (or director) of the Jeffersonian Institute (said he was on sabbatical for two months) and put in a new character (Cam) who was over Bones and her team. She's very direct and abrasive, and comes from a police background. I liked the actor and character of the old director, and wasn't sure about the new chick. But she's worked out well, pushing the relationships in unexpected directions.

I just didn't want to write all that, because if you've seen the show, you'll know what I'm talking about. And if you haven't seen the show, you should.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 09, 2006, 11:51:18 AM
Um, No.  Please Dear God No.


Please tell me you're not talking about Bones, the show about reconstructing crappy crimes with a supercomputer while Angel looks on with puppy dog eyes ?

'Cause if so I watched the whole first series while my wife dribbled over Boreanaz and all I can say is it's the worst and most moronic show I've ever, ever been subjected to.

Say it ain't so.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 09, 2006, 12:02:18 PM
I finally caught up over the weekend and watched The Office and Lost.

The Office-
Just HILARIOUS. God that show is good. Although Jim can no longer be my hero if he sucks at FPSs. Nothing is more annoying than a n00bler with a sniper rifle (and a smoke grenade!). Obviously he is going to start dating the woman behind him and then Pam will pine for him and it will be a reverse of the past 2 seasons. I am fine with that.

Lost-

Wow. I keep waiting for this show to get boring, but I was fascinated. It was pretty dark watching the heroes get mind-raped into submission/compliance. Also very interesting start with the book club in the bucolic village being interrupted by the EMP and the plane crash. What King book were they reading? I was guessing it was The Stand, which has a lot of parallels with the situation between the crash survivors and The Others.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 09, 2006, 12:15:36 PM
Um, No.  Please Dear God No.


Please tell me you're not talking about Bones, the show about reconstructing crappy crimes with a supercomputer while Angel looks on with puppy dog eyes ?

'Cause if so I watched the whole first series while my wife dribbled over Boreanaz and all I can say is it's the worst and most moronic show I've ever, ever been subjected to.

Say it ain't so.


It is. Don't know what you're complaining about, I like that show. I like the chemistry between Boreanz and Deschannel. I like all the characters. It's like House, it's a show you watch for the characters with the mysteries being window dressing. Of course, House has much better acting, but still. I like it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 09, 2006, 12:19:50 PM
 :cry:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on October 09, 2006, 12:22:07 PM
I watch it for the gooey bits.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on October 09, 2006, 12:47:07 PM
I watch it for Bones (the Doctor). She reminds me of an old flame of mine. Eerily so, even down to the way the hair falls into her face. Of course it could be that emotionally stunted thing, but who knows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 09, 2006, 06:30:39 PM
Bones is one of my "must record" shows. It has that X-Files/Odd Couple thing going where the guy, Agent Booth, is the "touchy-feely" type and the woman, Dr. Temperance "Bones" Breenan, is the logical/rational one, though Brennan is much more of a nerd than Scully was. Though it's a forensic show a la CSI I actually watch it for the characters rather than the forensic/science. I like the chemistry between Boreanaz and Deschanel as well and this season they are fleshing out some of the other characters like with the cute romance between Jack and Angela, two of Bones's assistants.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on October 09, 2006, 07:25:38 PM
Lost and House are on at the same time.  Going to have to TiVo one on the kids' so I can TiVo the other on mine.

I'm on the fence with Lost right now.  Not as good as it was, but it all depends on where they go.

I've missed BSG completely.  Guess I'll rent it when the DVD comes out. 

Shark - not only stars James Woods but costars Jeri Ryan (played 7of9 and incredibly watchable) and is directed by Spike Lee.  I'm liking this more and more.

The Wire - I rented Season 1, first 2 dvds, the video store doesn't have the 3rd, but they have the 4th and 5th.  I now have 5 episodes on my TiVo from this season, so I'm going to just start watching now.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 09, 2006, 07:53:43 PM
Lost and House are on at the same time.  Going to have to TiVo one on the kids' so I can TiVo the other on mine.

Pika?  Lost and Gray's Anatomy are on at the same time, I thought.  They moved House to 8:00 on Tuesday instead of 9:00 so they could fit in that horrible missing senator's wife show.  However, the official site says it's coming back at 9:00 on Tues. the 31st. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 09, 2006, 11:23:38 PM
Lost and Grey's Anatomy are both ABC so it would be hard to schedule them at the same time (Lost is Wednesday's, GA is Thursday's).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 10, 2006, 03:11:31 AM
I wish I could fast forward a year ahead so I can buy the entire season of Heroes on DVD. This is the first time in a long while where I've watched a show as it was being aired -- that kind of pacing will not do.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 10, 2006, 03:14:33 AM
I watch it for the gooey bits.

So does Christine, but Angel never seems to get them out.

I don't get the love.  It's like you've all admitted that you like watching  Emmerdale.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 10, 2006, 03:35:19 AM
I wish I could fast forward a year ahead so I can buy the entire season of Heroes on DVD. This is the first time in a long while where I've watched a show as it was being aired -- that kind of pacing will not do.

Holy shit. Ookii and I JUST had that conversation.

I swear to god if it suffers the same fate as Veritas, I will go off the grid for years.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 10, 2006, 04:05:29 AM
Lost and Grey's Anatomy are both ABC so it would be hard to schedule them at the same time (Lost is Wednesday's, GA is Thursday's).

My mistake, I remember what it is the co-worker was complaining is on at the same time now, CSI and Grey's Anatomy.  I think I also know why Xanthippe is thinking House and Lost were on at the same time; last week Fox showed a House rerun on Wednesday in place of whatever was usually there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on October 10, 2006, 11:23:08 AM
I wish I could fast forward a year ahead so I can buy the entire season of Heroes on DVD. This is the first time in a long while where I've watched a show as it was being aired -- that kind of pacing will not do.

Holy shit. Ookii and I JUST had that conversation.

I swear to god if it suffers the same fate as Veritas, I will go off the grid for years.

What does Heroes have to do with the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 10, 2006, 11:32:28 AM
Luck that girl has the power to regenerate because she has a habit of dying. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on October 10, 2006, 11:34:07 AM
Luck that girl has the power to regenerate because she has a habit of dying. 

I sighed very loudly when that mistake football hit turned her into Linda Blair.

BSG was Cylon Jesus. Lost was good (Jack has a glass jaw).

Tonight I subject myself to more punishment via Gilmore Girls.  Watching someone destroy a romance angle that they spent 6 years building tends to raise the bile in the back of my throat.  At least Veronica Mars follows it up and tends to wash the bad taste out of your mouth.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 10, 2006, 11:46:28 AM
I swear to god if it suffers the same fate as Veritas, I will go off the grid for years.
Quote from: Cat Man
What does Heroes have to do with the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System?

Veritas (http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/veritas/index.jsp)?  What?

Tonight I subject myself to more punishment via Gilmore Girls.

I actually enjoy this show when my system is muted.  Well, OK... tolerate.  I'm not really sure what is going on most of the time, whereas something like Desire is perfectly understandable without sound.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 10, 2006, 11:51:58 AM
Maybe I'll start calling her the Venture Sister.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: StGabe on October 10, 2006, 12:12:08 PM
Quote
Storyline driven TV in a 22 or 26 episode format sucks.  Catching a show every week becomes a necessity,  rather than a joy,  and the storyline tends to get either MASSIVELY dragged out (Firefly, most Whedon stuff)  or so convoluted that it's impenetrable as the run progresses(X-files seasons 5+).

That's why DVD's and downloading TV rocks (Heroes is on iTunes and probably illegally available all over the place).

As far as dragging out plot, that doesn't have to happen if they take a lot of time to develop the plot up front.  If they are writing from scratch every week then yes, you get lots of filler, but you just have to look at B5 for how it can be done right.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 11, 2006, 01:56:41 AM
I finally caught up over the weekend and watched The Office and Lost.

The Office-
Just HILARIOUS. God that show is good. Although Jim can no longer be my hero if he sucks at FPSs. Nothing is more annoying than a n00bler with a sniper rifle (and a smoke grenade!). Obviously he is going to start dating the woman behind him and then Pam will pine for him and it will be a reverse of the past 2 seasons. I am fine with that.

Lost-

Wow. I keep waiting for this show to get boring, but I was fascinated. It was pretty dark watching the heroes get mind-raped into submission/compliance. Also very interesting start with the book club in the bucolic village being interrupted by the EMP and the plane crash. What King book were they reading? I was guessing it was The Stand, which has a lot of parallels with the situation between the crash survivors and The Others.

I agree, and I hope it makes Pam realize how retarded she was. As far as Lost, I seriously think they need to start giving answers to some of the plot lines, but they just keep introducing new stuff. I might have to read The Stand, I think I have that book in my room actually.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 11, 2006, 11:44:51 AM
I might have to read The Stand, I think I have that book in my room actually.

Just read up to where they meet up with the old woman, then skip to the end.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on October 11, 2006, 12:46:34 PM
I wish I could fast forward a year ahead so I can buy the entire season of Heroes on DVD. This is the first time in a long while where I've watched a show as it was being aired -- that kind of pacing will not do.

I really hope Heroes has 1 or 2 seasons and then says, "We told our story. Thanks for watching." Otherwise it is going to turn into a steaming pile of badness. I have the same fear about BSG in a couple years too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 12, 2006, 11:30:19 AM
Quote
I might have to read The Stand, I think I have that book in my room actually.

It has some Steven King-y bits that are annoying, but for the most part it is a really interesting book. I would have loved it if he left out the semi-supernatural bits; the story of the world basically coming to an end was worth telling by itself. Well worth a look IMHO.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 12, 2006, 11:55:31 AM
I agree on the Stand. The post-apocalypse survival part was great, the pseudo-magical gathering of villians in Las Vegas was stupid. Glad I read it, though. He's written a few good books hobbled by crappy magic plot devices.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 12, 2006, 11:57:41 AM
The end was a cop-out like the end of the Dark Tower.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 12, 2006, 12:13:21 PM
The Stand had the same problem that other King books do for me: he starts off with a perfectly engaging realistic story, then cocks it up by totally changing things and going supernatural.  I can also point to Insomnia, although it didn't take too long for the weird shit to get in the way of the startup story.

I probably should have not suggested you skip to the end.  Now I remember the end was retarded.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on October 12, 2006, 09:24:24 PM
I accidentally caught the third episode of Jericho, found it intriguing, and watched the fourth ep last night. Having grown up in the Cold War, any post-apocalyptic tale is going to hook me, but it's essentially Fallout 90210. OC of the Flies, Dawson's Apocalypse. They keep *almost* running out of food/fuel/luxuries, but never quite enough to affect them. So there's a bar open, a party at a teenager's house, and everyone has good personal hygeine.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 12, 2006, 10:49:38 PM
Well it looks like WayAbvPar was spot on. Jim and that girl behind him seem to be hitting it off. He went through so much trouble to get her that big of chips, awwwwww  :heart:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 13, 2006, 07:33:36 AM
We need a Pam/New Girl oil wresting match over Jim.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: shiznitz on October 13, 2006, 08:11:07 AM
Jericho would be better if the whole cast slowly suffered from radiation sickness.

In real life.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 13, 2006, 09:40:43 AM
Ah, shit. We forgot to watch Earl/Office last night. Sonofa.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 13, 2006, 09:48:00 AM
Please tell me you have a TiVo to go with your ginormous TV, Sky. Otherwise I shall be forced to laugh uncontrollably at you  :evil:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 13, 2006, 10:02:57 AM
I keep forgetting to DVR those two shows because we normally watch them in (ecch) real-time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 13, 2006, 11:22:01 AM
How can you stand to watch TV in real-time? I get antsy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 13, 2006, 11:30:28 AM
I always think that when we are watching it. It's the only couple shows we still watch in real-time. We were at my mother's house monday and it was pure torture watching plain old tv, no cable just the old roof antenna. From suffering through commercials to having no idea what was on other channels, it's amazing how quickly you can get used to the luxuries of modern pay tv.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on October 13, 2006, 12:19:58 PM
Even if I want to watch in real time I will wait x minutes/hours and then catch up to it midstream (I do this with hockey games alot). I can't STAND commercials. Although the cell phone one with the guy confronting his friend about seeing his girfriend's # in his friend's phone and then it rings to the tune of "Secret Lovers" cracks me up to no end.

Lost was excellent again this week. Season 2 was uneven, but 3 is hitting home for me. I think there should be copious shots of Kate bending over in every episode, both frontal and from behind. That is just quality TV right there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 13, 2006, 01:39:24 PM
There was some cell phone commercial with a mom and daughter doing a bizaroo teen conversation that was chuckleworthy the first time I saw it.

But ohfuck the slimey national committee campaign ads. One is accusing our DA who is running for some office of thinking it's ok to let rapists walk. A guy who spent his career thus far trying to put away rapists. It's nuckin' futz. I love the voice-over guy, though. I want that job, political slime ad voice-over guy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 13, 2006, 04:56:04 PM
You missed Earl, Sky?  The you missed a great little montage of all the after effects of  Randy's various breakups.  It was him sitting there holding the 80's cassette player with with "Time After Time" playing through all these various scenes. It had me in stitches.  I just couldn't stop laughing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on October 13, 2006, 05:02:41 PM
I agree on the Stand. The post-apocalypse survival part was great, the pseudo-magical gathering of villians in Las Vegas was stupid. Glad I read it, though. He's written a few good books hobbled by crappy magic plot devices.

/tangent: For a better 800 page Post Apocolyptic book - try Swan Song by Robert R McCammon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 14, 2006, 01:45:34 AM
How can you stand to watch TV in real-time? I get antsy.

Me too. The only time I see commercials is when I watch football, cuz I HAVE to watch the Cowboys live.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 14, 2006, 01:46:18 AM
We need a Pam/New Girl oil wresting match over Jim.

Oh yeah, that would be awesome. I got $50 on the new girl.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on October 14, 2006, 05:59:47 PM
I'm completely hooked on heroes now. Bastards.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 15, 2006, 04:33:03 AM
I'm completely hooked on heroes now. Bastards.

Me too. Anyone know where I can get the first two episodes? Or will I have to wait until it comes out on DVD?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 15, 2006, 04:36:27 AM
Still enjoying Six Degrees.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 15, 2006, 04:39:07 AM
Still enjoying Six Degrees.

Never even heard of it? A quick review?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 15, 2006, 05:14:59 AM
Handful of people meet one another through a series of coincidences. It's basically taken from the Six Degrees rule where you know everyone through a minute chain of people (ya know, 6, like Kevin Bacon). But it's actually very well cast. You've got Bridget Moynahan, that guy from Crazy/Beautiful (who ends up being a damn fine actor - tv caliber at least), Erika Christenson, that dude from Rodger Dodger (who is just awesome), and a hdnful of other b-list people who are turning out the performance of their lives.

The story ain't half bad either. I fear though, at this pace, they won't have a big enough reveal for me at the end of the season. There's a couple loose ends I'm already worried about. It's probably the fourth best show on TV right now (tied with Grey's Anatomy). That's not particularly fair though since Heroes, House, and Shark are all above it...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on October 15, 2006, 02:02:43 PM
I'm completely hooked on heroes now. Bastards.

Me too. Anyone know where I can get the first two episodes? Or will I have to wait until it comes out on DVD?
Torrents. I sent you a PM.

I find it obnoxious you can watch the latest episode (http://www.nbc.com/Video/rewind/full_episodes/?show=heroes), but not the previous ones legitimately (http://www.nbc.com/Heroes/). Oh well, they don't really need another solid gold humvee.

Also, I can confirm that BSG is robot jesus. I have seen the light. I held off for 3 episodes, trying to give myself a head start, but after this evening I'm now stuck week to week just like everybody else. I really need to limit myself to watching only box sets.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 16, 2006, 01:30:00 AM
Handful of people meet one another through a series of coincidences. It's basically taken from the Six Degrees rule where you know everyone through a minute chain of people (ya know, 6, like Kevin Bacon). But it's actually very well cast. You've got Bridget Moynahan, that guy from Crazy/Beautiful (who ends up being a damn fine actor - tv caliber at least), Erika Christenson, that dude from Rodger Dodger (who is just awesome), and a hdnful of other b-list people who are turning out the performance of their lives.

The story ain't half bad either. I fear though, at this pace, they won't have a big enough reveal for me at the end of the season. There's a couple loose ends I'm already worried about. It's probably the fourth best show on TV right now (tied with Grey's Anatomy). That's not particularly fair though since Heroes, House, and Shark are all above it...

I actually saw part of that the other night, lol, I didn't even realize that's what it was called. A Gray's Anatomy fan? Awesome, me too. You forgot Weeds, which is definitely top 3. I thought Six Degrees was alright, and am in love with that woman photgrapher. Mmmmm.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 16, 2006, 01:31:38 AM
I'm completely hooked on heroes now. Bastards.

Me too. Anyone know where I can get the first two episodes? Or will I have to wait until it comes out on DVD?
Torrents. I sent you a PM.

I find it obnoxious you can watch the latest episode (http://www.nbc.com/Video/rewind/full_episodes/?show=heroes), but not the previous ones legitimately (http://www.nbc.com/Heroes/). Oh well, they don't really need another solid gold humvee.

Thank you very much. Yeah I don't really understand why they would do that. I can see taking them off when they get ready to release it on DVD, but whatever.

Sorry for the double post, I don't know how to quote two replies in one post. I'm a noob :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 16, 2006, 07:01:24 AM
Me too. The only time I see commercials is when I watch football, cuz I HAVE to watch the Cowboys live.
That's why they play two games at once except for the night games, which seem like they go on for years. We tend to gather for the first game of the day and switch between NBC and Fox (who really need to get their HD shit together on Time Warner imo). Bills game wasn't even in HD. I was rooting for the Lions because my buddy is a hardcore Bills fan, but that Losman scramble pass was sweet. Roy Williams had a hell of a day, even if one of the dipshit announcers referred to him as the singing cowboy (who was Roy Rogers).

Siragusa should not be allowed to have a microphone, Shannon Sharpe is also on notice for his primitive grunting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on October 16, 2006, 09:26:51 AM
I wasn't sure the 3rd season of BSG was going to be that great, the first episode was sort of blah to me. Then the second one just rocked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 16, 2006, 11:22:07 AM
Siragusa should not be allowed to have a microphone, Shannon Sharpe is also on notice for his primitive grunting.

QFT.

Also, why do the halftime shows feel they have to spend 3 minutes per commercial break, and 30 seconds trying to break down highlights and stats on 5 or 6 games. Fuck, you'd have to be on crack and speed just to try to keep up, and with guys like Bradshaw and Sharpe, it's impossible. JUST SHOW ME THE GODDAMN HIGHLIGHTS. If you have to continue giving out 3-minute commercial breaks, at least cut out the peanut gallery commentary and just focus on the stats and highlights.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 16, 2006, 07:14:24 PM
Goddamn Heroes.  This is worse than watching 24 on the 'show me more, damnit' factor.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on October 17, 2006, 08:10:38 AM
Goddamn Heroes.  This is worse than watching 24 on the 'show me more, damnit' factor.

Was trying to figure our what was happening on the subway last night, and damn - I expected it was who is was but the loop they threw in was awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 17, 2006, 10:03:41 AM
Hiro is the man, and Heroes is the best show on TV right now. I was practically cheering at the ending they threw in there last night.

Also, Venture Bros. 2-parter was fan-fucking-tastic. They took what was a fairly low-key sardonic show and just threw in everything and the kitchen sink. I can't believe Adult Swim actually considered not renewing that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 17, 2006, 11:15:00 AM
Not only is Venture awesome, and the two-parter superb, they love Bowie.  Half his lines were lyrics, and when I pointed out his reply to Brock's direction to start on the second verse, she pointed out that I like Bowie way too much.

Edit: pretty sure the shirtless guy was Iggy Pop but I can't place the other one... although my wife took the obvious one: he's Taco.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 17, 2006, 11:20:09 AM
Yeah, the shirtless one was Iggy Pop, but the Taco guy? Not sure, but Taco is a good guess. Falco maybe?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 17, 2006, 11:38:12 AM
Good ol' Wikipedia says it is Klaus Nomi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Nomi).  He was a backup singer for Bowie on SNL in 1974.  Awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 17, 2006, 11:54:50 AM
I can't say enough good things about Venture Bros. and BSG.

I am worried Heroes will going south.  There has been a few cheesy things and this "Save the Cheerleader, save the world" thing looks more of the same.

Lost is really pissing me off with their refusal tell us who the Others are.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 17, 2006, 01:38:29 PM
Lost is really pissing me off with their refusal tell us who the Others are.

They are the people charged with making sure no one fucks with the equation on the island. Or something (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-eHEYswgK8).



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 17, 2006, 04:38:01 PM
This last Heroes episode felt shorter than the others.

Also, like all of you, I'm really liking it, but I just realized how slow this storyline is developing. It's only now in the 4th episode where more characters are actually meeting and interacting with each other.

And I still don't know what's going on.

Is this going to be an X-Files thing or what (i.e. Mulder still on the search for his sister 6 seasons in)?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 17, 2006, 05:12:28 PM
The creators of Heroes has already said get comfortable for an epic. I'm thinking more like Babylon 5 than X-Files, since it probably has a structure of beginning, middle and end (or will) whereas X-Files just lost its way after season 4 and never did wrap the story up with any clarity.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 17, 2006, 05:39:53 PM
The creators of Heroes has already said get comfortable for an epic. I'm thinking more like Babylon 5 than X-Files, since it probably has a structure of beginning, middle and end (or will) whereas X-Files just lost its way after season 4 and never did wrap the story up with any clarity.

X-files last episode (or was it 2) wrapped everything up nicely.  I hadden't caught anything out of the Robert Patrick season, and I was able to follow just fine.   Cancer man explained it all, Scully heard we were all fucked, found Mulder and they waited for the inevitable in a Motel room as Cancer man was blown to bits by an Apache.  The End.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 17, 2006, 09:37:25 PM
That was not a good wrap up at all. It felt completely unfinished to me. It was like that was the halfway point of the story, not the end. Great, there's an alien invasion in 2012 and we're all fucked. That's it? Weak sauce.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 18, 2006, 02:42:32 AM
Lost is really pissing me off with their refusal tell us who the Others are.

They are the people charged with making sure no one fucks with the equation on the island. Or something (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-eHEYswgK8).



Ok, that video really confused me. Not trying to look too stupid here, but was that released by ABC or something?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on October 18, 2006, 07:27:04 AM
I still enjoy Smallville (six seasons going strong).  Season 5 and 6 (so far) seem to be getting away from the "Kryptonite infected angsty emo kid kidnaps Lana and Clark throws him through a wall in the three second window Lana is looking away" theme.  The show has been written well pretty consistently and I've never found a reason to stop watching. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 18, 2006, 07:42:06 AM
I stopped watching when they introduced an actual Lois instead of that being Chloe's pen name. I liked that it was Lana and Clark, but you always knew he'd end up with Chloe. The show itself was meh aside from that triangular tension, once they blew that I had had enough.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 18, 2006, 09:53:14 AM
Lost is really pissing me off with their refusal tell us who the Others are.

They are the people charged with making sure no one fucks with the equation on the island. Or something (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-eHEYswgK8).

Ok, that video really confused me. Not trying to look too stupid here, but was that released by ABC or something?

It was part of some web marketing push they put out before the season 3 began. It was split up into 5 or 6 different pieces and someone put it all together. It doesn't answer a lot, but you can infer a bit from it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 18, 2006, 10:12:16 AM
That was not a good wrap up at all. It felt completely unfinished to me. It was like that was the halfway point of the story, not the end. Great, there's an alien invasion in 2012 and we're all fucked. That's it? Weak sauce.

Yep, that's it.  We're all doomed, end of story, fade to black.  Congrats, you spent the last 6 seasons enjoying, not a heroic epic, but a tale of future doom. No happy ending here for you, anything you do is futile.

X-files always enjoyed the gloomy endings.  Just look at the poor Lone Gunmen.


Of course, I'm also one of the folks who hopes when Jordan writes his last book everyone fails, the Shadow wins, the end.  I like dark endings.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 18, 2006, 11:54:57 PM
30 Rock is showing promise.

Also there's a three hour Heroes marathon on Sunday starting at 8/7c for those who missed them.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 19, 2006, 01:11:33 AM
Lost is really pissing me off with their refusal tell us who the Others are.

They are the people charged with making sure no one fucks with the equation on the island. Or something (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-eHEYswgK8).

Ok, that video really confused me. Not trying to look too stupid here, but was that released by ABC or something?

It was part of some web marketing push they put out before the season 3 began. It was split up into 5 or 6 different pieces and someone put it all together. It doesn't answer a lot, but you can infer a bit from it.

Thank you, I'll have to watch it again with that in mind.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 19, 2006, 09:06:26 AM
Locke is getting ridiculous.   It wouldn't surprise me to see him buy a pet turtle and then in the next scene watch the turtle betray him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on October 19, 2006, 09:48:24 AM
So I see you've hit the spoilers too, tazelbain!

But seriously, there are suckers that fall for everything and therefore get conned more than other people. The Sawyers of this world can smell the Lockes of this world miles against the wind. Thats one of the more believable things in Lost.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 19, 2006, 11:30:00 AM
But seriously, there are suckers that fall for everything and therefore get conned more than other people.
We call them Bush supporters.   :rimshot:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 20, 2006, 08:09:48 AM
Oh, and if a friend comes over, sees that you have a lot of fertilizer and offers to help you blow something up, that's not a time to laugh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on October 20, 2006, 10:11:56 AM
After that subway scene I have decided I shall now refer to him as Hiro Protagonist.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 20, 2006, 11:55:47 AM
After that subway scene I have decided I shall now refer to him as Hiro Protagonist.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. That shit rocked the house.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xerapis on October 21, 2006, 04:51:17 AM
I just watched episode 4 of BSG.

I'm in awe.

There's just no other way to put it.

I was actually jumping out of my chair and yelling.  In a good way! ^^

Truly powerful television show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Surlyboi on October 21, 2006, 08:15:36 AM
I will cut and paste possibly the best quote summing up last night's BSG over on TWoP (http://televisionwithoutpity.com).

Quote
Adama jumped the entire fucking Battlestar into atmosphere.
What? What? Who does that?
I'm fairly certain that voids the hell out of the warranty. I'm fairly certain there's little red and yellow stickers on the underside of Galactica that say:
"Warning, Do Not Plow Into Some Planet's Unsuspecting Stratosphere Like The World's Grimmest And Most Heavily Armored Fat Kid Jumping Into A Pool Full Of People He Hates Screaming Cannonball With A Grenade In His Teeth, Yeah, We're Talking To You Adama, 'Cause Jesus Christ."
If I'm a Humlon, and I look out of the window of my compound and see this... psychotic act of badassery, in my heart I know we're just never going to subjugate or defeat these people.

Amen. Best show on TV? Battlestar Fucking Galactica.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on October 21, 2006, 10:04:57 AM
I will cut and paste possibly the best quote summing up last night's BSG over on TWoP (http://televisionwithoutpity.com).

Quote
Adama jumped the entire fucking Battlestar into atmosphere.
What? What? Who does that?
I'm fairly certain that voids the hell out of the warranty. I'm fairly certain there's little red and yellow stickers on the underside of Galactica that say:
"Warning, Do Not Plow Into Some Planet's Unsuspecting Stratosphere Like The World's Grimmest And Most Heavily Armored Fat Kid Jumping Into A Pool Full Of People He Hates Screaming Cannonball With A Grenade In His Teeth, Yeah, We're Talking To You Adama, 'Cause Jesus Christ."
If I'm a Humlon, and I look out of the window of my compound and see this... psychotic act of badassery, in my heart I know we're just never going to subjugate or defeat these people.

Thanks for the spoiler, asshole.

Amen. Best show on TV? Battlestar Fucking Galactica.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 21, 2006, 01:57:22 PM
Even knowing what happened, it's badass.   I watched it the second time just to see it again.  :-o


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jayce on October 21, 2006, 05:00:06 PM
Even knowing what happened, it's badass.   I watched it the second time just to see it again.  :-o

Me too. I never watch the epidodes of anything we DVR really, but I fast forwarded to this to check it out again.

I also like how every other SF show/movie has to come up with this huge justification as to why they have to leave the atmosphere/system to jump to light speed.  BSG?  Hover 5 feet off the ground, jump.  Sweet.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Numtini on October 21, 2006, 06:24:21 PM
If Michael Hogan (Tigh) doesn't win the Emmy, they might as well just close up shop and forget about the whole thing.

(Unless they give it to James Callis-Gaius)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 21, 2006, 10:58:51 PM
You assume the Academy hands out things based on merit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on October 22, 2006, 02:45:52 AM
Think he means they should shut down the Emmys.

Which they should anyways.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 22, 2006, 03:21:18 AM
You corrected Yegolev, and I correct you:

Numtini is a she.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 22, 2006, 11:29:37 AM
Yeah, that BSG episode kicked all kinds of ass, especially the jump in atmosphere bit. Talk about a nut clenching moment. How do you top that? This season is going to have to work hard as hell to ramp up the tension, because that was just spectacular. I have to tip my hat to these guys. It was a huge narrative risk to jump the timeframe a year forward, even more of a risk to break up the dynamics that existed by splitting up the characters and putting them on the underside of a repressive society. And they pulled it off.

How do the producers of Independence Day manage that? Who thought they had it in them to hire the writers capable of it? Hats off.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on October 22, 2006, 11:51:47 AM
You corrected Yegolev, and I correct you:

Numtini is a she.

Fuck, I keep forgetting.

Girls should stop using the Internet to make things less confusing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 22, 2006, 01:33:41 PM
Quote
How do the producers of Independence Day manage that? Who thought they had it in them to hire the writers capable of it? Hats off.


Who are you referring to here? I don't think David Eick, Paul M. Leonard or Ronald D. Moore had anything to do with ID4.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 22, 2006, 10:24:25 PM
BSG is one of the better shows on TV,  when Olmos isn't on screen.  When he is,  it becomes something mythic.  "Prepare for some turbulence"....


Was running down some Jim Butcher stuff this afternoon, and came across info on "Dresden Files" which is set to air on Scifi in January.

The producer is the guy that brought us Relic Hunter and Mutant X.  <shudder> And Nic Cage is a producer.

Maybe I'll skip this in order to not poison my appreciation of the books.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: XboxGod on October 23, 2006, 01:44:44 AM
I was happy that NBC the last three episodes of Heroes tonight, wish they would have aired the pilot, but at least I got the torrent for that already. Thanks guys ;)



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on October 23, 2006, 05:50:08 AM
BSG + Heroes + Venture Bros. = all the television anyone needs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 23, 2006, 06:54:56 AM
Heroes + House + Shark + Grey's Anatomy + Six Degrees + Supernatural = more hours than I have in a week for TV.

math itt


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 23, 2006, 08:04:16 AM
Quote
How do the producers of Independence Day manage that? Who thought they had it in them to hire the writers capable of it? Hats off.


Who are you referring to here? I don't think David Eick, Paul M. Leonard or Ronald D. Moore had anything to do with ID4.

You are correct. For some reason, I kept thinking Devlin had something to do with BSG, and he was completely unconnected. Oh well, still a great fucking show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 23, 2006, 09:49:58 AM
The UniversalHD run of BSG is up to the one where the Chief builds the stealth fighter monster-garage-style. I've stuck with it from the first episode and it's starting to grow on me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 24, 2006, 04:50:25 AM
I'm liking Studio 60 more. Hopefully it'll get picked up for the rest of the season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 24, 2006, 08:59:58 PM
Can we break off a Heros spoiler thread?  I have all four hours on my Tivo and haven't caught up yet.

Or is this whole thread considered a spoiler free-for-all?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 24, 2006, 11:46:02 PM
Can we break off a Heros spoiler thread?  I have all four hours on my Tivo and haven't caught up yet.
Yeah I was just thinking about doing that this afternoon before I stepped out for the evening.

Quote
Or is this whole thread considered a spoiler free-for-all?
It's kind of hard to make a thread about television shows spoiler-free but I did split the most recent Heroes stuff off on its own.

New Heroes thread (with lots of spoilers) (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=8498.0)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 25, 2006, 10:34:23 AM
The UniversalHD run of BSG is up to the one....

What?  BSG on UHD?  Time to find an extra $10 a month, obviously.  I watch The Office in HD, but HD is rather wasted there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on October 25, 2006, 09:54:37 PM
I just saw BSG 4th episode.  My God.

Greatest.  Movie/Show EVER. 

I am in AWE.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 25, 2006, 10:09:15 PM
By "Movie/Show" do you mean greatest out of any TV movies, or do you literally mean greatest out of any movies and shows?

Like, is it merely greater than Roots and Lonesome Dove, or is it also greater than Citizen Kane and Belle De Jour?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 25, 2006, 11:12:24 PM
That came off far too serious. Mentioning Catherine Deneuve can in no way be used for friendly jest.

So....

What is the best TV movie anyways?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on October 26, 2006, 12:55:11 AM
Back in Community College I decided to take a Screenwriting class, and my teacher made a big deal out of his experience.  See, he'd been nominated for an Emmy.  As a producer.

What did he produce?

Some shitty made-for-TV movie starring the guy from Quantum Leap (I want to say Scott Bakula was his name).

He showed us a clip.  It was Quantum-Leap-Guy crashing a small plane into a lake.

I nominate that for best TV Movie ever.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 26, 2006, 08:54:52 AM
The UniversalHD run of BSG is up to the one....

What?  BSG on UHD?  Time to find an extra $10 a month, obviously.  I watch The Office in HD, but HD is rather wasted there.
Yep, it's in the second season I think. Anyway, the ep I mentioned with Chief building the stealth ship was the latest one. They also just started the first season of Firefly, that's a great show.

My film appreciation prof and I used to argue like crazy. We agreed Hitchcock was cool, but he went to school with Brian DePalma and thought he was the best director ever and I was heavy into Kubrick at the time, who he dismissed as a hack. I can't really think of any tv movies, so I'll just say when the Bradys went to Hawai'i.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on October 26, 2006, 04:42:23 PM


How do the producers of Independence Day manage that? Who thought they had it in them to hire the writers capable of it? Hats off.

I think it's the Canadian influence. (For anyone who doesn't know, it's shot in Vancouver and half the cast is Canadian)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 27, 2006, 12:32:39 PM
TV movies?  Does the Dune serial count?  The non-Lynch one?

No no no, wait... The Man with the Screaming Brain.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: murdoc on October 27, 2006, 02:23:03 PM

They also just started the first season of Firefly, that's a great show.


Wife and I just ran through the DVD set of Firefly again. She's not a sci-fi fan by any means, but she can't understand how that show "failed" either. Such good stuff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 27, 2006, 02:46:10 PM
I am staring to think the name is an issue.  Neither firefly nor serenity gives you much of a clue what the show is about or entice you investigate more.

Another thing, big story arcs.  Firefly had one.  It was pretty good too.  But if you watched only one show, you may not even notice it. Needed to make it more obvious.  And of course if you are going to big story arcs, show the episodes in order. Duh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 28, 2006, 01:11:13 AM
The problem with Firefly was primarily the scheduling and how it was jerked around so badly. I am a sci-fi nerd and I never even heard about it until it was off the air from Fox.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on October 28, 2006, 01:59:17 AM
Yeah they played the Firefly episodes out-of-order, in differing timeslots, and some episodes were missed (never aired). So what you see now - episodes in order, with a story arc - was not an experience anyone had until the DVD was released, months after the show was cancelled.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on October 29, 2006, 07:44:07 PM
Speaking of Firefly/Serenity, are they making more?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on October 29, 2006, 09:50:22 PM
Nope. Josh Whedon (sp?) has said over and over again he is DONE with that universe and would the rabid fans please leave him alone, thanks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 29, 2006, 09:52:22 PM
He's busy working on Wonder Woman. He should open the license up for books to get all the fanbois off of his back (maybe he already has, I don't follow franchise fiction).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on October 29, 2006, 10:01:27 PM
I'd write one.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on October 30, 2006, 12:14:19 PM
I'd write one.

 You killed Chewie you bastard!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on October 30, 2006, 06:22:17 PM
Nope. Josh Whedon (sp?) has said over and over again he is DONE with that universe and would the rabid fans please leave him alone, thanks.
Well, I feel he's learned his lesson. Maybe next time he won't work for Fox and thus CREATE rabid fans who then feel they've gotten the shaft and have to follow him around, begging for more.

I understand Sci-Fi did a bit of gentle checking to see if Fox would part with the rights for new shows (this was before Serenity was released) and Fox said "No". Whedon won't work for Fox anymore (I believe he was quite emphatic about that), Fox won't part with something it suspects is worth money, and I don't think the rights revert to Whedon until something like 2010.

Pity, though. Looked like there was a wealth of good stories there. It's been a good decade for decent Sci-Fi. The latter half of DS9, Farscape, Firefly, BSG, the Stargates, the new Dr. Who... Heroes counts too, I'd say. Even Futurama is coming back. Sci-Fi isn't all technobabble and gadgets (hell, that's the lazy side of it). Good sci-fi talks about what it means to be human. What it means to reach. It's ethics, and humanity, and fucking people and I for one was sick and goddamn tired of it just being phasers and teleporters when it came to TV.

The Lathe of Heaven's gadgets didn't have a goddamn thing to do with the book, anymore than Sense and Sensibility was about how fucking boring Victorian England was. Dune wasn't about ornithopters or sandworms and Childhood's End was not about "Fucking aliens! In spaceships! Woah!".

Goddamn lazy ass writers. I'll take my 13 episodes of Firefly and consider it's death worthwhile if it means future writers have to actually know what the fuck sci-fi is supposed to be because of it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 30, 2006, 11:19:23 PM
I've come to the conclusion that Futurama is the greatest sci-fi show ever. I'm glad it's coming back.

Seriously. It seems like my favorite elements and episodes of other sci fi shows is the comedic stuff --- and Futurama is all about being funny. I tend to hate science fiction that takes itself too seriously (I'm looking at you BSG).

And if it isn't overt comedy, at the very least, I like sci fi to have some absurdity to it. Dune (especially the books), what little of Heinlein I've read, Star Trek, Buck Rogers, most comic books, Arnold movies -- all pretty funny on some level.

This might be why I hate fantasy (outside Conan...and some stuff from Warhammer....both of which are funny).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on October 30, 2006, 11:26:07 PM
Maybe next time he won't work for Fox and thus CREATE rabid fans who then feel they've gotten the shaft and have to follow him around, begging for more.

Rule #1 of Showbusiness:

Never leave them wanting more.  Drive off your fans with as much oversaturation as possible. See: George Lucas

(That started off ironic and ended up looking true.)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 31, 2006, 12:30:38 AM

I understand Sci-Fi did a bit of gentle checking to see if Fox would part with the rights for new shows (this was before Serenity was released) and Fox said "No". Whedon won't work for Fox anymore (I believe he was quite emphatic about that), Fox won't part with something it suspects is worth money, and I don't think the rights revert to Whedon until something like 2010.

I don't get that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on October 31, 2006, 01:32:14 AM
I'm liking Studio 60 more. Hopefully it'll get picked up for the rest of the season.


Apparently not. Studio 60 getting the axe? (http://www.tv.com/story/6954.html). That's just sad, I really liked that one :(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 31, 2006, 02:36:02 AM
I'm liking Studio 60 more. Hopefully it'll get picked up for the rest of the season.
Apparently not. Studio 60 getting the axe? (http://www.tv.com/story/6954.html). That's just sad, I really liked that one :(
They did order up 3 more episodes but it's unclear if they will be aired -- last night they showed Friday Night Lights intead of Studio 60 but the Web page says they will be back next week so presumably they will show at least one more episode and then decide.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 31, 2006, 06:47:41 AM
My DVR was all set to record the office and earl last week, I checked a couple hours beforehand because we went out of town. But it didn't record it. Goddamned technorogy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on October 31, 2006, 07:15:34 AM
IIRC they were re-runs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on October 31, 2006, 09:43:13 AM

I understand Sci-Fi did a bit of gentle checking to see if Fox would part with the rights for new shows (this was before Serenity was released) and Fox said "No". Whedon won't work for Fox anymore (I believe he was quite emphatic about that), Fox won't part with something it suspects is worth money, and I don't think the rights revert to Whedon until something like 2010.

I don't get that.
I'm not sure what you don't get, but as best I understand the situation:

1) Fox owns the rights to Firefly until something like 2008 or 2010, when they revert to Whedon if Fox doesn't actually make more shows. These are JUST the rights to air new episodes, and only for TV. I think Whedon also has to agree.
2) Whedon owned the non-TV show rights -- so he could sell and produce Serenity. I think Whedon might own the syndication rights. If not, Sci-Fi either bought those rights or paid for the right to air Firefly on Sci-Fi.
3) Whedon won't work for Fox anymore -- period -- so even if Fox said "Okay, I wanna make new episodes of Firefly", Whedon won't do it.

Whenever TV shows, movies, books, etc are being created and sold, there's a shit ton of legal crap. Rights to the show, rights to syndication of the show, rights to toys, rights of first refusal to spinoffs of the show, rights to this and rights to that. Whedon -- when he made the deal with Fox to produce Firefly -- gave up as little as possible (I think he still has bad memories of some of the Buffy and Angel shit).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on October 31, 2006, 10:36:21 AM
Whedon has not exactly stated that he has moved on; just that there will be nothing in the foreseeable future.  He did say he would like to delve into the universe more, but in the manner of a movie, not TV.  He stated recently that he would like to do a straight to DVD format with like 12 hours or so of footage, that way he could shoot the whole thing and people would not need to wait for the story archs to finish.  Check out his blog, he is filled with ideas.

But, due to legal reason, he cannot at this time.  Who knows what may happen in the future.  At least Serenity was close to breaking even.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 31, 2006, 11:35:20 AM
There's going to be some SG-1 straight-to-DVD action to wrap up the Ori stuff, I read on some fansite.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on October 31, 2006, 11:51:58 AM
I'm not sure what you don't get, but as best I understand the situation:

I don't get why they think it's worth money.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on October 31, 2006, 12:02:12 PM
I'm not sure what you don't get, but as best I understand the situation:

I don't get why they think it's worth money.
I have no idea either. Perhaps they simply don't want to sell the property and see someone else make money on it, but don't want to invest to make money on it themselves. Perhaps they've been trying to get Whedon to restart it for Fox, but he won't play ball, and it's just a big game of "FUCK YOU/NO, FUCK YOU!" on both sides.

Perhaps they're just morons. I mean, their TV executives do seem pretty stupid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 31, 2006, 12:09:11 PM
Perhaps they're just morons. I mean, their TV executives do seem pretty stupid.

It's Fox. When the fuck have they ever made any sense whatsoever? They throw more good money away than the government.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on October 31, 2006, 12:45:21 PM
I think they should cancel Family Guy again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on November 04, 2006, 12:31:06 PM
I really liked BSG ep 6. Those profound episodes with the moody music and editing are unlike any other sci-fi series. Didn't miss the action element at all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on November 04, 2006, 03:16:17 PM
Bravo started airing episodes of Six Feet Under recently, and I'm hooked.  I can't believe I didn't watch this when it was on HBO.  I think I assumed it would be a "gay" television show, and just dismissed it.  It's the first show I've seen that portrays gay people in a way that I not only can stand watching, but actually find enjoyable.

It's also been amusing to see half the leading cast of Deadwood having small roles on the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on November 06, 2006, 09:34:18 AM
I think they should cancel Family Guy again.

Last night's ep had some seriously hysterical moments.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 09, 2006, 09:53:20 PM
Studio 60 picked up for a full season (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_en_tv/tv_studio60).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on November 09, 2006, 10:40:01 PM
I think they should cancel Family Guy again.

Last night's ep had some seriously hysterical moments.

I was just making fun of Fox, their dumbass moves and clear inability to tell what their audience wants.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 10, 2006, 06:44:52 AM
(http://www.jenanne.com/mt-static/archives/20050326trainwreck.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 11, 2006, 01:50:38 AM
Men in Trees is moving to ABC's primo time slot for new shows -- Thursday's at 10pm after Grey's Anatomy -- on November 30th. That means that Six Degrees, which has that slot now is either moving somewhere else (perhaps swapping with MiT) or is being cancelled.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 22, 2006, 07:02:07 AM
American Music Awards. What a complete bag of garbage. The only remotely enjoyable thing was Fall Out Boy, and I don't dig the new pop punk, and their mix was terrible (but then, so was everyone who didn't have a 8Hz bass drum beat). It got bad toward the end when they announce that joker chamillionaire and we just bust out laughing. The presenters were a procession of people I can't abide. Manilow medley?? My lady owes me big time for making me sit through that garbage. Glitzy mainstream clear channel riaa force-fed garbage.

There was literally nobody on that show who I listen to, RHCP won two but they weren't actually in the building.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2006, 07:39:20 AM
Yeah I don't get popular music these days but I get to say that cause I'm an old fart. Like that Gwen Stefani "song", for example. Rodgers and Hammerstein must have been rolling over in their graves. Carrie Underwood looked good, though, even though that outfit was a bit odd. She looks like she's been working out. And I'm glad they invited the Dixie Chicks to perform. Tenacious D was a let down -- hopefully the movie will be better.

Edit: "movie" not "move"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 22, 2006, 08:29:21 AM
Kyle did pretty good but Jables just phoned it in vocally.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on December 03, 2006, 02:55:56 AM
Do we have a place yet to talk about the BSG "Fight Club" soap opera episode? I kinda liked it, but people all over the Internet want to kill me for that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on December 03, 2006, 03:10:19 AM
Do we have a place yet to talk about the BSG "Fight Club" soap opera episode? I kinda liked it, but people all over the Internet want to kill me for that.
There's nothing preventing you from starting a thread to discuss the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on December 03, 2006, 05:21:53 AM
No, but we usually discuss it in here. Having been away for a week, and posting over a day after it aired, I was thinking I'd missed something. Seen so much negativity about that episode elsewhere.

The thing I found bizarre was the amount of blood and the vicious beatings, as opposed to actual boxing matches. Beating someone into unconsciousness seemed to be treated like a minor event, among people who are the last surviving members of the human race. Other than that, it was a better episode than I expected it to be and I thought it answered some questions about Starbuck's frame of mind and set her moving forwrads again, but lots of people felt it was a substandard soap opera.

I think Anders and Dee (spouses of Starbuck and Apollo) now stand to become wild cards in the plot if Kara and Lee are an item. What will the scriptwriters do with two strong actors with tough, aggrieved characters? Hope it's a bit more sinister than just making them an item, too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on December 03, 2006, 10:20:13 AM

I think Anders and Dee (spouses of Starbuck and Apollo) now stand to become wild cards in the plot if Kara and Lee are an item. What will the scriptwriters do with two strong actors with tough, aggrieved characters? Hope it's a bit more sinister than just making them an item, too.

I liked the episode a lot. When I saw the promos I was thinking, "Ohh shit, another craphole gimmick ep like that noir one or Scar". It managed to work in the boxing framework very well. Lots of little nuances everywhere and some rather biting bits of dialogue.

It's interesting, it seemed like Anders walked away assuming they were still fighting. Dee seems to be a bit more perceptive (can't stop feeling sorry for Dee, I like her). Whether this leads to another attempt at their doomed-to-failure romance?  Who knows, but at least they reconciled.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jayce on December 03, 2006, 03:13:32 PM
I liked the episode for itself to some extent (I've seen better) but what I really was hoping for was some downtime, which this episode delivered. 

I think it's a mistake to have the heroes save the world in each and every episode.  Sometimes you have to slow down and have some good old fashioned character development.  I think realizing that is what separates good scifi from more of the same.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 04, 2006, 12:21:47 AM
So.....They've been airing Rome Season 2 commercials on HBO.

Also, World of Warcraft and Peter Gibbons unite (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kT6hKRyZL4g).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 10, 2006, 09:18:37 PM
I am so stoked to watch the season finale of The Wire in 45 minutes that I invented a 14 foot PVC pipe with a golf club cleaning tool taped to the end Dish Snow-Scrubberoffer.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 10, 2006, 09:57:53 PM
12 Oz. Mouse must be some project to see just how far one can get away with broadcasting complete crap.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 10, 2006, 11:41:10 PM
Aqua Teen Hunger Force has also gone off the deep end of suck. Williams Street needs to take a break.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 11, 2006, 12:04:17 AM
I keep seeing (what seems like) repeats of ATHF. I've missed quite a few though, so it's still funny to me.

More than half of Williams' series are pretty bad though. I agree.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on December 11, 2006, 08:20:31 AM
Aqua Teen Hunger Force has also gone off the deep end of suck. Williams Street needs to take a break.

Yeah, the latest season of Aqua Teen seems to have ceded all control to the guy who writes 12 oz. Mouse. It's just 10 minutes of seeing how many times they can say the word "dick" "pussy" or something else offensive without any real reason for any of it. The guy making the rocket ship out of dicks was just retarded. The only episode this season that was any good was the one with the Mooninites and it didn't have nearly the same oomph as previous appearances by those characters.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on December 11, 2006, 10:29:50 AM
I am so stoked to watch the season finale of The Wire in 45 minutes that I invented a 14 foot PVC pipe with a golf club cleaning tool taped to the end Dish Snow-Scrubberoffer.
Thirteen episodes later and they are finally going to start to open a criminal case, next season.  I know it's a slower moving police drama but damn.  :evil:

Yeah, yeah, I know it was more about the kids and school this season.  I actually started watching it because a few of you said you liked it and have since bought seasons one and two.  I'm hoping someone will track down season three as a Christmas present but if not I'll pick it up myself so I can find out how that whole Barksdale thing ended, although it was already alluded to this season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on December 11, 2006, 11:43:49 AM
I always feel bad when people don't watch The Wire from season 1 when I tell them to.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 11, 2006, 12:00:32 PM
Heroes + House + Shark + Grey's Anatomy + Six Degrees + Supernatural = more hours than I have in a week for TV.

math itt

Nah, Supernatural, BSG, and Dexter is all the TV anyone needs. I can't believe none of you people talk about Dexter, I am more hooked on it than BSG now.

About Dexter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_%28TV_series%29 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_%28TV_series%29)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 11, 2006, 01:33:01 PM
My Dad keeps telling me about Dexter, but the main actor really turns me off. He looks and behaves like a cheesy soap opera villain. I could possibly tolerate him in one episode, but not an entire series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 11, 2006, 01:45:33 PM
About the BSG Airing of Grievances, my wife said it was very soap-opera-y, to which I replied if it involved boxing matches I'd probably watch Knot's Landing.  Character development is good.  Also, my wife never liked Kat.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on December 11, 2006, 02:06:39 PM
I didn't like the boxing episode, but I have come to accept that there is going to be a few filler episode between the "OMG WTF awesome!" episodes.

Anyway, This one was good but I loved this weeks pre-view. "Take Baltar, please!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 11, 2006, 02:21:37 PM
I always feel bad when people don't watch The Wire from season 1 when I tell them to.

That episode last night was pretty amazing. That little 3 minute montage at the end packed more substance and plot into it than most shows have in an entire season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 11, 2006, 07:17:27 PM
I've caught bits and pieces of Dexter,  was sort of interesting,  but haven't made the effort to sit down and catch an entire episode.  I was mostly trying to figure out where the hell I knew the blonde that plays Dexters girlfriend from...

Very much looking forward to season 2 of Rome,  and really hope my closing comes through before it starts.  The process of buying a house has been killing me, and I'm without HBO at the moment.  I look forward to more Pullo,  Verenus,  and Octavian;  not to mention what a serious asshole I'm sure Antony is going to be. 

Bring back Cleopatra.  Please.

Hate to say it,  but I've really been caught up with UFC on Spike.  Some really pretty good fights there (not counting anything with Ken Shamrock),  and they've made good efforts to add the drama element with the Ultimate Fighter while simultaneously pushing their more charasmatic people and fighters (Ortiz, Dana, St. Pierre, etc.)

Some of what goes on is pretty amazing.  BJ Penn's flexibility and natural talent,  Liddell's intenstiy (that guy's scary),  the power some guys like Hughes and Ortiz show off....



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on December 13, 2006, 12:54:50 PM
Anyone else think The Lost Room is great.  Maybe I am just a sucker for Fantasy set in the present.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 13, 2006, 07:20:29 PM
Anyone else think The Lost Door Room is great.  Maybe I am just a sucker for Fantasy set in the present.

The Lost Room is pretty good.  Helped much by the fact that they went out and snagged some decent actors (dude from Sports Night and Six Feet Under, Juliette Marguilles, Kevin Pollack, Spud from Trainspotting) and a good writer.

It feels very much like an adaption of a Tim Powers book.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 14, 2006, 06:52:27 AM
I've caught bits and pieces of Dexter,  was sort of interesting,  but haven't made the effort to sit down and catch an entire episode.  I was mostly trying to figure out where the hell I knew the blonde that plays Dexters girlfriend from...

She played Darla on Buffy and Angel. (for you Whedon haters  he has nothing to do with Dexter, and no other actors from his shows are involved.) She was also in an episode of Supernatural about a faith healer. (My girlfriend told me who she was, I was going "she looks vaguely familiar".)

I highly recommend Dexter if you have Showtime. It has beat out BSG as the best thing on TV IMO. They somehow manage to balance intense and humorous at the same time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jayce on December 15, 2006, 11:56:04 PM
So, BSG is moving to 10pm/9c Sunday.  What kind of time slot is that?

Pretty good midseason cliffhanger.  Though it's pretty clear that the nukes won't hit the ground, given the fact that the preview shows people on the ground still alive, which sort of dampens the hanging part.

I think The Passage (previous episode) was one of their best so far.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 18, 2006, 12:09:47 PM
So, BSG is moving to 10pm/9c Sunday.  What kind of time slot is that?

A fucking shitty one.  I'd actually be angry about it if I wasn't using TiVo.  The question I have is, what is going to be on Friday night now?  Extra SG-1?  That show is a pox upon our civilization.

Though it's pretty clear that the nukes won't hit the ground, given the fact that the preview shows people on the ground still alive, which sort of dampens the hanging part.

I can't watch those upcoming-scene segments.  They just fuck up everything.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 18, 2006, 12:40:47 PM
So, BSG is moving to 10pm/9c Sunday.  What kind of time slot is that?

A fucking shitty one.  I'd actually be angry about it if I wasn't using TiVo.  The question I have is, what is going to be on Friday night now?  Extra SG-1?  That show is a pox upon our civilization.

Isn't Sunday considered a better time slot than Friday evening?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on December 18, 2006, 12:46:41 PM
Now it will be in the same time slot as Adultswim's 9:30c slot where they have been putting their flagship shows.  I hope I don't ever have to choose between BSG and Venture Bros.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on December 18, 2006, 01:17:17 PM
So, BSG is moving to 10pm/9c Sunday.  What kind of time slot is that?

A fucking shitty one.  I'd actually be angry about it if I wasn't using TiVo.  The question I have is, what is going to be on Friday night now?  Extra SG-1?  That show is a pox upon our civilization.


I think the Dresden Files?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on December 18, 2006, 06:19:47 PM
So, BSG is moving to 10pm/9c Sunday.  What kind of time slot is that?
A fucking shitty one.  I'd actually be angry about it if I wasn't using TiVo.  The question I have is, what is going to be on Friday night now?  Extra SG-1?  That show is a pox upon our civilization.
Isn't Sunday considered a better time slot than Friday evening?
Generally speaking it is. BSG may have a skewed demographic with nonstandard viewing habits since it's a Sci-Fi show and it's on cable but for a typical network broadcast show moving from Friday to Sunday would be a huge promotion like when Fox did that with X-Files.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 18, 2006, 08:35:27 PM
Dresden and BSG are going to be on Sunday nights, either the 8-10 slot or the 9-11 slot.  I'm not sure what's being left on Fridays.

Friday (and Saturday) nights are fucking killing grounds for TV shows, in general.

Anyone else notice how piloty The Lost Room left it's ending?  Are they just fishing for a part 2 mini,  or was the network thinking of trying to produce a series?

That would be pretty interesting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on December 19, 2006, 08:33:53 AM
I haven't watched it yet, but Lost Room was built as a pilot type of deal. Sci-Fi does own an option for a series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on December 19, 2006, 08:44:23 AM
I think the Riverworld mini was the same deal.  Too bad that didn't catch on.
Given the lack buzz about LR, I doubt it will be picked up either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jayce on December 19, 2006, 10:58:34 AM
Now that I think on it, I agree - Sunday is a promotion.  It's hard to remember what it's like being the sort of person that does ... stuff... on Friday nights. I'm domesticated.

On an unrelated note, I came back a day later to check and see if anyone had responded to my BSG post.  I was still the last post when I checked the thread, but by the time I returned to the forum, Yegolev had posted! Eerie...

(I was too lazy to make note of it then, but I hereby attach this interesting coincidence to this post as a rider.)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on December 19, 2006, 12:26:22 PM
Weekends...  keke.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on December 19, 2006, 12:28:33 PM
I didn't even realize that BSG was in the dreaded Friday night slot. Up here it plays on Saturdays at 6:00PM. Thank noodlies for DVR.

The Passage did impress me. As soon as the episode started I had it pegged for a generic filler episode. "Oh my god will she make it?!? Yep she did." type stuff. They suprised me with how it went.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on December 20, 2006, 06:38:54 AM
Bah. Unless you have SciFi in HD or have a burning desire to view shows brand-new, just watch it on UniversalHD (again, if you have that option). HD BSG is friggin great, like the ep where they faced Scar in the asteroid field.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on December 20, 2006, 06:41:04 AM
I highly recommend Dexter if you have Showtime. It has beat out BSG as the best thing on TV IMO. They somehow manage to balance intense and humorous at the same time.

Yep.  Excellent, excellent show.  I like the fact that they really haven't tried to "humanize" the character.  He's a flatout sociopath, and you can never really forget it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on December 20, 2006, 07:17:24 AM
Oh I don't know. He came across as pretty humanized when his girlfriend gave him that little surprise a few episodes ago. :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on December 21, 2006, 06:52:36 AM
Finished the Lost Room the other night. Wally kinda made the show for me. The ending was far too weak though. Also, did they want Dakota Fanning and just couldn't get her?

The objects thing was totally cool when they were talking about them. Dark and hilarious. But the total package was just unbelievably meh.

I think I'm gonna watch Taken for the 4th or 5th time though. That's a miniseries that just doesn't get old (for reasons I can't quite put my finger on).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on December 21, 2006, 09:44:34 AM
I've been enjoying 4400 for some reason I can't put my finger on either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on December 21, 2006, 10:51:55 AM
I just finished watching the season finale of Dexter. It was just amazingly good - better than any other show I've watched this season. Kudos to whoever it was that first mentioned it here.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on December 21, 2006, 02:02:33 PM
I just finished watching the season finale of Dexter. It was just amazingly good - better than any other show I've watched this season. Kudos to whoever it was that first mentioned it here.

Lab geek my ass!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 22, 2006, 11:53:04 PM
Finished the Lost Room the other night. Wally kinda made the show for me. The ending was far too weak though. Also, did they want Dakota Fanning and just couldn't get her?

The objects thing was totally cool when they were talking about them. Dark and hilarious. But the total package was just unbelievably meh.

I think I'm gonna watch Taken for the 4th or 5th time though. That's a miniseries that just doesn't get old (for reasons I can't quite put my finger on).

I liked the whole idea of the Objects,  and how they created huge moral dilemmas because they expanded the capacity to act.  Sort of a modern take on the whole Ring of Invisibility shtick.  Generally,  people who had Objects led miserable lives...   not because of mystical curse mumbo jumbo,  but because the Objects freed them to behave outside of societal norms and their actions then conflicted with the characters own moral codes.

Lots of interesting characters,  and good character development.  Would be interesting as a series if they kept the same caliber of writing and acting.

I actually liked Margaret Cho in this, too....  and I think she's terrible in nearly everything she does.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on December 23, 2006, 09:14:00 AM
I love Dexter.  It might have been me who mentioned it on f13.  We have a special deal from Comcast because we're new in the area for Showtime, Starz and HBO and I thought I'd get rid of Starz and Showtime, but now I'm keeping Showtime because of Dexter.  I watched Lost, too, and thought it was pretty good.  Better than most stuff I've seen on the Sci Fi channel.  I appreciate when people post about stuff they find on the Sci Fi channel because I never remember to check it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 23, 2006, 10:16:59 PM
I love Dexter.  It might have been me who mentioned it on f13.  We have a special deal from Comcast because we're new in the area for Showtime, Starz and HBO and I thought I'd get rid of Starz and Showtime, but now I'm keeping Showtime because of Dexter.  I watched Lost, too, and thought it was pretty good.  Better than most stuff I've seen on the Sci Fi channel.  I appreciate when people post about stuff they find on the Sci Fi channel because I never remember to check it.

Scifi is like alot of cable....  Huge amounts of suck/mediocrity with occasional gems.  Farscape and BSG,  for some people Stargate.  Eureka is a pretty good show,  as are some of the things they pick up after cancellation like Dead Like Me and Firefly.

I think Dresden has alot of potential....  fun books, and the author is involved in the series.  For Hoax,  later books add a pretty neat overall storyline going on in the background while they lose some of the very episodic feel.

I'll have to catch up on Dexter, sometime.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 24, 2006, 06:39:27 AM
Those new Rome commercials on HBO are getting me stoked. Starts January 14. Yeah!

Personally, I find the rise of Octavian and the Cleopatra/Marc Antony story to be more interesting than Julius.

Also, Titus Pullo must die.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 24, 2006, 09:24:57 PM
Those new Rome commercials on HBO are getting me stoked. Starts January 14. Yeah!

Personally, I find the rise of Octavian and the Cleopatra/Marc Antony story to be more interesting than Julius.

Also, Titus Pullo must die.

No!  Not Titus Pullo!

It will be interesting to see what they do with Caeserian (the kid Cleo had that she claimed as Julius Ceaser's)...   I believe he was assassinated by one of the factions to clear up who was the successor to Julius.

Moving into my new place now, hope I have cable for the Rome premier....


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2006, 04:12:53 AM
Octavian kills Cleo's kid.

Since it's really Titus' son in the show though, and Titus and Octavian are pals, that will be interesting to see how it turns out.

Titus still needs to die though. What he did to Eirene's fiance was the last straw (speaking of Eirene, I hope it isn't her who does it. She's possibly the only character in the entire series who've never done one thing wrong. A complete innocent. She should stay that way.).

Titus is also the greatest character on the show too. Don't get me wrong. I like him.

[EDIT]

Actually, just about everybody should die. They're all horrible.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on December 25, 2006, 05:18:53 AM
Since it's really Titus' son in the show though, and Titus and Octavian are pals, that will be interesting to see how it turns out.

You really think Augustus would hesitate to kill off Pullo's offspring?  Not a chance.  And Pullo won't be dying anytime soon.  He's allied himself to the winning faction.  Vorenus, on the other hand, has tied himself to Antony's sinking ship.  If they cover the battle of Actium, that's where he'll likely bite the dust.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2006, 06:05:31 AM
I definitely don't think Octavian would hesitate, but I'm curious what Pullo would try to do to Octavian.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 25, 2006, 01:00:14 PM
Since it's really Titus' son in the show though, and Titus and Octavian are pals, that will be interesting to see how it turns out.

You really think Augustus would hesitate to kill off Pullo's offspring?  Not a chance.  And Pullo won't be dying anytime soon.  He's allied himself to the winning faction.  Vorenus, on the other hand, has tied himself to Antony's sinking ship.  If they cover the battle of Actium, that's where he'll likely bite the dust.

Thanks Stray,  couldn't remember if it was Antony or Octavian that had killed Caeser's (faux) kid to clear up who was Caeser's heir.

Octavian and Antony were allied under the Second Triumverate (fuck if I can remember the third partner....  he was really sort of a warm body) after crushing the Senate forces.  Octavian switches sides a couple of times in there,  so it'll give Lucius Vorenus a chance to come on over to the winners.

Octavian is just too smart and manipulative not to see the value of getting Vorenus over to his side.  Vorenus is a popular/near mythic figure in Rome for the rescue of Pullo,  has served/commanded in the Legions,  and was bumped up to Senatorial rank by Gaius Julius.  He's worth about 8 or 10 Brutus' or any of the other conspirators that did Julius in.

And of course,  he's going to be vulnerable to some heavy duty manipulation with the death of his wife.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2006, 03:21:37 PM
The third man in the Second Triumvirate was Marcus Lepidus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Aemilius_Lepidus_%2849_BC%29). An old supporter of Julius Caesar, but a politician who also had the ear of the Senate. He was also married to Brutus' sister. Octavian eventually turned on him after defeating Antony, but only sent him off to exile.

He also rescued his mother-in-law from execution (Servilia/Caesar's mistress/Brutus' mother).

Kind of odd that they didn't introduce this guy at all in the first season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 25, 2006, 03:59:43 PM
I mentioned Dexter a few pages ago because I was hoping to get some of you guys to watch it. It's currently, by far, my favorite show on TV. I sometimes go a week or two before watching my DVRed BSG, but I watch Dexter the night it comes on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 25, 2006, 06:20:46 PM
The third man in the Second Triumvirate was Marcus Lepidus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Aemilius_Lepidus_%2849_BC%29). An old supporter of Julius Caesar, but a politician who also had the ear of the Senate. He was also married to Brutus' sister. Octavian eventually turned on him after defeating Antony, but only sent him off to exile.

He also rescued his mother-in-law from execution (Servilia/Caesar's mistress/Brutus' mother).

Kind of odd that they didn't introduce this guy at all in the first season.

Bah, you Wiki'd it.  No fair!

I kept wanting to say Crassus,  but he was in the First Triumverate with Ceasar and Pompei.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2006, 06:44:46 PM
Oops! Sorry about that ;).

Now that you mentioned Crassus, it kind of sucks that they didn't start Rome Season 1 during that period. Would have been interesting seeing the younger Julius and Pompey, as well as Spartacus. We could have had all of that, and not such a quick departure of Caesar for the series as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 25, 2006, 09:33:36 PM
Oops! Sorry about that ;).

Now that you mentioned Crassus, it kind of sucks that they didn't start Rome Season 1 during that period. Would have been interesting seeing the younger Julius and Pompey, as well as Spartacus. We could have had all of that, and not such a quick departure of Caesar for the series as well.

Yah, but then you'd have to show the conquest of Gaul,  the invasion of Britain (twice), etc.

Crassus' son was one of Ceasar's generals for a while,  before he joined his father out east in time to be slaughtered by the Parthians.

One thing the show didn't do enough of:  the casual brutality endemic to Rome.  More than once,  Ceaser condemned one of his legions to decimate themselves...  Or emphasize the very poor standing of women (even noble women) in the society.

One of the reasons why Christianity spread so quickly was that the religion was much more egalitarian then basic Roman society.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 05, 2007, 06:41:13 AM
Universal HD is a great channel. They just picked up Stargate Atlantis, I'm assuming to fill the gap now that season two of BSG wrapped up (I think - the crazy two-parter about the election and New Caprica). I really hope they get the new seasons, BSG was made to be viewed in HD. How far did Firefly get before it was cancelled? I mean seasons, no spoiling please :) Time slot for SG:A was Thursday 10pm, not sure if that's going to be permanent. They also picked up Surface, I'll DVR the first few episodes to replace my Firefly viewing time if it's not too bad. Surface ep1 is on Saturday (and then repeated ad nauseum for some reason).

Also in HDland news, InHD2 disappeared :( but was replaced by Music:HD, a conglomeration run by MTV, VH1, and CMT. So far a pretty weak lineup, a weak new Skynyrd was on last night (the third guitarist was some Johhny Hollywood douche, but worth watching for Billy Powell), HD Storytellers with Pearl Jam. A bunch of shitty pop country videos. Pop country is so bad. I love country music (especially bluegrass), but that CMT shit ain't country, boy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 05, 2007, 09:40:40 AM
CMT shit isn't country, it just smells like it. Like shit, I mean, shit stuck to cowboy boots.

Firefly had 13 episodes I think. Not even a full season, and not all the episodes were aired originally.

The BSG episode you speak of was the finale of season 2. Season 3 starts with the occupation of New Caprica by the Cylons.

Surface is worth sticking with. It had some characters that were annoying, and it stretched believability in places, but it all builds up to one helluva season (and unfortunately series) finale. I've seen few finales that were that good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 05, 2007, 11:49:19 AM
Apparently I just saw the last aired episode, Objects in Space. Sucks it got cancelled, it was a fun show with good dialogue. They had also aired the previously unaired episodes, which is cool. So I guess that's that for Firefly.  And looks like BSG is wrapped up for a season or more unless they overlap the SciFi season, which I kinda doubt.

http://www.tv.com/battlestar-galactica-2003/show/23557/episode_listings.html?season=3&tag=nav_bar;3

I'll take your advice on Surface, as I like to have two shows to watch. I wish they'd start SG-1 from the beginning, too. Or maybe even Farscape, though that show was pretty loony.

Found this too:

http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/video/index.php?cat=webisodes&vid=29339


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 09, 2007, 10:00:47 AM
Update: just saw a commercial during UniversalHD's airing of Atlantis...BSG season three starts later this month! I think it said the 28th..

Update 2: Saturday January 27th (http://www.universalhd.com/Schedule/search.bravo?month=2007-01&time_zone=ET&keyword=Battlestar).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on January 09, 2007, 12:50:22 PM
The dad from Stuart Little saves another life and goes to court tonight.

My wife pointed that out to me, and it sticks in my head every time I watch House.

He was in two of the Blackadder series as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 09, 2007, 12:53:47 PM
He was the villain in the last episode of series II (as well as the drinking contest ep), so he was actually in 3 of them  :-D


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on January 09, 2007, 04:29:29 PM
I still find it really hard to mesh the way he talks in House with the nancy boy way he spoke in BA III.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 09, 2007, 05:17:00 PM
ROME!!!

HBO is replaying Season 1 at 8 all week in preparation for the rollout of Season 2 on Sunday.
 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 09, 2007, 06:57:47 PM
ROME!!!

HBO is replaying Season 1 at 8 all week in preparation for the rollout of Season 2 on Sunday.
 

About damn time, never saw half of them and damned if I'd pay HBO series prices.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 09, 2007, 07:01:50 PM
I got my refill through On Demand. Do you guys have that? It's almost as much as a convenience as disk recording.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 09, 2007, 07:11:05 PM
My friend has that.... thats how I watched the first 4 or so then it disappeared entirely for a few months and then only showed the later episodes.  I can't stand skipping eps so I just didn't watch it after that. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: RhyssaFireheart on January 09, 2007, 10:22:41 PM
So I'm hoping and praying that the local DirecTV installer shows up on Saturday the 20th like they claimed they would, and gets our new HD dish and DVR setup.  I want to be able to finally record some of these shows.  Plus, The Dresden Files start Sunday evening and I'm sure I'll forget to watch.  Not sure how I feel about that though.  The guy playing Harry just doesn't fit my mental image.  Still, I'm hoping it's interesting and well done.

Oh yeah, maybe I'll watch part 2 of season 3 instead of waiting for the DVDs to come out.  That reminds me, must get season 2 DVDs back from friend so I can watch. EDIT - maybe I should mention I was talking about BSG in this here line.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 10, 2007, 06:28:43 AM
I got my refill through On Demand. Do you guys have that? It's almost as much as a convenience as disk recording.
Not in HD :(

I can't get too down on Time-Warner right now, the addition of UniHD has been too cool, even if the MusicHD channel has sucked wind thus far. Watched the first ep of Surface and it seems pretty cool, in an x-files way. One thing that bothers me is the female scientist is actually /too/ hot. Distracts from watching the actual show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 11, 2007, 01:59:10 AM
Ok. I've pimped this before, but I just finished up watching the second season finale of The Wire. I've been watching the 1st and 2nd seasons that I received for X-mas, one or two eps a night since. If you have not watched this show

GO BUY IT, RENT IT OR ON DEMAND IT RIGHT NOW

This is the single best television show ever put to celluloid (or whatever the hell they use for TV). Start at the beginning because it is important. Things that happen in the very first ep reverberate through the whole series.



/currently as drunk as Bunk or McNoltey pissing on the tracks


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on January 11, 2007, 03:02:37 AM
When you say it's the single best Television series ever, you mean it's HBO caliber. Fucking every show from HBO gets called that. And you know what? They're all good fucking TV. And anyone who likes TV eventually ends up watching HBO stuff. Either that or they don't have any interest in good TV. This isn't a subjective thing. Except Carnivale, what an overrated piece of shit. Thankfully HBO realized that pretty quickly.

Rome starts this week.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 11, 2007, 09:00:53 AM
My wife has suddenly become a big fan of Metalocalypse.  She's so fucking metal.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 11, 2007, 09:58:50 AM
My wife has suddenly become a big fan of Metalocalypse.  She's so fucking metal.

Lucky.  Mine just shakes her head, rolls her eyes and says "Oh, jeez."    She wasn't all that impressed with Kogarth of Barbaria either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sissygirlman on January 11, 2007, 11:22:00 AM
So, anyone know what this season of Rome has in store for us? 

Brutus vs Mark Anthony ?

Mark anthony vs Octavian ?

Both ?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 11, 2007, 12:31:35 PM
My wife has suddenly become a big fan of Metalocalypse.  She's so fucking metal.

Lucky.  Mine just shakes her head, rolls her eyes and says "Oh, jeez."    She wasn't all that impressed with Kogarth of Barbaria either.

I am pretty surprised, really, because she is really the opposite of metal.  It took a couple viewings, maybe three.  Also, she's a fan of Home Movies and Brendon Small, and was willing to give it a shot.  It helps a great deal that it is actually very funny, particularly Skwisgaar's comments.  "...a producer det can't find snakes from dildos..." and whatnot.

We can only understand about ten percent of what Murderface says.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 11, 2007, 02:35:30 PM
So, anyone know what this season of Rome has in store for us? 

Brutus vs Mark Anthony ?

Mark anthony vs Octavian ?

Both ?


"If He can't keep me dry, Triton can suck my dick!"
"Pullo!  When will you ever learn to keep your mouth shut"
<ship sinks>

If the show follows history, potential spoilers:


Senate vs Mark Anthony.  Octavian switches sides to Anthony.  Octavian/Anthony/Lepidus take out Brutus/wayward Senators (Cicero dead).  A couple of Pompei's sons try a rebellion in Spain,  put down.  Peace,  while Anthony heads out to Egypt.  Ocatavian vs. Anthony.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 11, 2007, 02:54:32 PM
I must admit I am not metal and luck warm towards the show. But I kinda like where they are going with the Illuminati and the band manager.  Frisky Dingo is more my style, but they need to find a part for Brett Butler.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sissygirlman on January 13, 2007, 12:37:33 AM
So, anyone know what this season of Rome has in store for us? 

Brutus vs Mark Anthony ?

Mark anthony vs Octavian ?

Both ?


"If He can't keep me dry, Triton can suck my dick!"
"Pullo!  When will you ever learn to keep your mouth shut"
<ship sinks>

If the show follows history, potential spoilers:


Senate vs Mark Anthony.  Octavian switches sides to Anthony.  Octavian/Anthony/Lepidus take out Brutus/wayward Senators (Cicero dead).  A couple of Pompei's sons try a rebellion in Spain,  put down.  Peace,  while Anthony heads out to Egypt.  Ocatavian vs. Anthony.
nice summary, but you left out Anthony banging Cleopatra, his slave girls, his officers wives, random chick A. etc etc


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 13, 2007, 12:43:17 AM
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, Pullo will be on Octavian's side until Octavian decides to kill Caesarean. Then shit will go crazy after that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ganon on January 13, 2007, 01:32:22 AM
I found some cheap Xena: Warrior Princess DVDs the other day.  It is still as timeless and perfect as when the episodes ran. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on January 13, 2007, 08:22:25 PM
So, anyone know what this season of Rome has in store for us? 

Brutus vs Mark Anthony ?

Mark anthony vs Octavian ?

Both ?

This was a dumb post. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 14, 2007, 08:10:37 PM
Rome!

Good kickoff episode, though they kill you with what they show and what they don't.  Octavian will emerge as a player next week.  Atia was just whiny and self-centered. (More so then usual.)  Anthony was pretty good.  Verenus and Pullo at the end of the episode were classic.

I really like what they do with the cinematagraphy and shadow in this show.  They like to put shadow on one side of an actors face, especially in dramatic moments, that forces you to focus on the side that's lighted.  It's almost like you're looking at a bust in profile.  Or something.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 14, 2007, 10:07:34 PM
Anthony was pretty good.

Anthony kicked ass.

I really hope that dude was just lying to Verenus (about his daughters). Maybe he just knew it was over for him, and decided to say that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on January 15, 2007, 07:05:08 AM
Anthony kicked ass.

Yep.  I really wish they'd showed Octavian laying down the law more, though.  He's the pater familias, and he needs to put Atia in her place.  Sure, he mentioned it this episode, but he really didn't push the matter.  I'll grant you that noble women had some say in Roman society, but the pater familias was the fucking law, period, and Atia would be well aware of that.  They could kill members of their family, sell them into slavery, etc and it was all perfectly legal.  The head of the family had absolute power in that society.

I also wish they'd had it so he heard about Caesar's will while he was in Greece so he'd have to come back and confront Antony, rather than this immediate partnership they seem to have going.  Antony was not at all happy to have someone calling himself Caesar barging into the city while he's chasing away the liberators and trying to set up his own dictatorship.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 15, 2007, 07:30:11 AM
It was better times.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sissygirlman on January 15, 2007, 09:48:37 AM
I think Anthony has a good actor starring as him, matched with him being histories better characters.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on January 15, 2007, 12:11:51 PM
Anthony kicked ass.

Yep.  I really wish they'd showed Octavian laying down the law more, though.  He's the pater familias, and he needs to put Atia in her place.  Sure, he mentioned it this episode, but he really didn't push the matter.  I'll grant you that noble women had some say in Roman society, but the pater familias was the fucking law, period, and Atia would be well aware of that.  They could kill members of their family, sell them into slavery, etc and it was all perfectly legal.  The head of the family had absolute power in that society.


Actually, I liked how rather than trying to just bully his mother in to doing what he wanted (and thus making an enemy of her), he played subtley to her greed and got what he wanted anyway. The wry little smile he showed after she changed her mind about leaving Rome was perfect.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on January 15, 2007, 01:20:44 PM
Actually, I liked how rather than trying to just bully his mother in to doing what he wanted (and thus making an enemy of her), he played subtley to her greed and got what he wanted anyway. The wry little smile he showed after she changed her mind about leaving Rome was perfect.

True enough, and I'd sort of thought about that, but on the other hand her little edicts still irk me when she isn't the head of family (that's Octavian), has never been the head of the family (that was Octavian's father until his death, and then Caesar), and never can be the head of the family (she's a woman).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 15, 2007, 04:18:51 PM
Rome has the opposite problem Deadwood had:  Too much story to pack in.

12 episode seasons mean they have to fast forward through some interesting stuff to get to the big events,  and cuts down on the character development.  Anthony was great,  but they pushed the rift between Anthony and Atia really quickly to ready the way for Cleopatra next episode.  Octavian is great,  but they haven't been moving his character development quickly enough so there's going to be one episode where we get the brief transition from kid to defacto leader of Rome.

It looks like they're going to fast forward to the Second Triumverate (maybe not even bringing in Lepidus as more than a stooge) to get to the Anthony/Octavian confrontation.

That said....  I really liked the way Octavian started to man up this episode.  He put forward the plan,  which worked,  and also pushed him ahead as a power behind Anthony.  All of Gaius Julius' land and property to Octavian, as well as his name?  Oops, you fucked up Anthony.  I loved how he went to Pullo and confessed his whole part in the disaster. 

Honestly,  Pullo will be torn but he may stick to Octavian (there seems to be some kind of budding mentor/student or confessor-type relationship building there) even over killing Ceasarion.  Pullo would make a hell of a Praetorian bodyguard for Octavian.  The dude is flat out a badass,  who life treats poorly...   only two people show him the respect he craves:  Verenus (awkwardly, as is his way) and Octavian, who treats him far above his station.


Also, agreeing with Big Gulp, they really don't push some of the innate inequalities in Roman life (I've said it before) in favor of the "omg, they weren't repressed Puritans when it comes to sex!!11!1" angle.

Literally,  Roman women had virtually no standing in Roman society.  Sure, the Romans weren't afraid of public nudity or explicit sexual portrayal (see temples to Priopasm!) but....  HBO hammers home the sex angle,  then makes Servilla an equal partner in the conspiricy.  It glorifies how liberal the Romans were in some aspects,  and ignores how amazingly backward in others.

Hell, one of the reasons why the Roman mob turned on Anthony was because he was seen as being too much under the influence of Cleo.  And of adopting too many foreign customs, of course.

There was an Emperor who was widely criticized (maybe even deposed) because he was seen as listening and doing what his wife wanted.

That being said,  there have been some good scenes showing the difference in standing...  like Niobe serving Verenus while not eating,  and some of the husband/wife interactions.

The head of family had nearly all legal rights in Roman society.  The lesser men,  and all women, couldn't even legally own anything.  This extended to patron relationships between noble families and freedmen.



Well...  I'm in a bind next week.  I want to watch Rome, but either Dresden or BSG will be on during that time slot.  BSG is great TV,  that understands pacing,  and I have high hopes for the Dresden adaption....


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on January 15, 2007, 06:10:59 PM
The head of family had nearly all legal rights in Roman society.  The lesser men,  and all women, couldn't even legally own anything.  This extended to patron relationships between noble families and freedmen.

They also don't really go into just how deep the whole pater familias concept goes.  Just because you've reached the age of maturity, gotten married and started a family of your own doesn't mean you're now the pater familias.  Father still alive?  His brother?  You and your entire family will be living with him (along with your brothers and unmarried sisters), and you technically own nothing.  Everything you own (including your life) belongs to the pater familias.  Your children belong to him, your slaves are his.

The wrinkle here is that when a woman gets married off (usually around 13-14 years old) she belongs to the family she marries into, and then belongs to the pater familias of that family.  Now the woman is given a dowry that can't be touched (actually it can, but it needs to be paid back), and if she's divorced (a common occurence), the dowry comes with her.  Then there's adoption, which the Romans had a strange view towards.  There was no bias against adoption...  Caesar may have been Octavian's great uncle, but as soon as he's named heir he's Caesar's son, end of story.  The Romans didn't really see any difference between adopted children and biological children.  Furthermore, Octavian inherits the name completely.  He's no longer "Octavian", he's "Caesar" and would insist that he be addressed as such.  This'll come in very helpful when Octavian needs to get together a private army that's completely loyal to him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 15, 2007, 07:51:38 PM
Because nobody else said anything about it.

WITH.

HIS.

FUCKING.

TEETH.

BITCH.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 16, 2007, 09:11:28 AM
Ya, that was pretty hardcore.  Enough to ignore the fact that all major terrorist plots against the United States originate in Los Angeles 15-20 minutes from CTU headquarters.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 16, 2007, 09:16:25 AM
In my mind when ever he does anything crazy, he screams, "I'm Jack Bauer, bitch!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 16, 2007, 09:53:24 AM
Ya, that was pretty hardcore.  Enough to ignore the fact that all major terrorist plots against the United States originate in Los Angeles 15-20 minutes from CTU headquarters.

Yeah, that particular plot point got pretty thin around the 3rd season, but now I just have campy fun with it. (Part of the problem being LA thinks it's the center of the known universe..)  The same with everyone who dobuts Jack dieing some horrific/ tragic death.  (Which is why I'm fairly sure Chloe is safe this season.  She's the Prophet of Bauer) I'm thinking that some sort of biblicly-toned epic poem could be written, and it would be hilarious.

   "And on the 5th day, Jack did rise from the dead and rip-out the throats of the unbelievers.  Then did CTU fuck-up by disbelieving and was incinerated in firey, nuclear death."

In my mind when ever he does anything crazy, he screams, "I'm Jack Bauer, bitch!"

Doesn't everybody?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on January 16, 2007, 09:56:24 AM
So, has he died and been miraculously brought back to life yet this season?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 16, 2007, 11:40:08 AM
No, but after being stabbed by what I can only assume to be rebar in his ass, and being stabbed in his shoulder, he's just dandy (apart from the nuke and shootings) a few hours later.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 16, 2007, 12:28:07 PM
What kind of torture would make those marks on his hand? Electrified water?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 19, 2007, 05:16:46 AM
What kind of torture would make those marks on his hand? Electrified water?

I've been going with acid.  Why on the hand? I dunno, makes cool scars?


And since I'm amazed nobody's posted it here yet; HBO picks-up Song of Ice & Fire (http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117957532.html?categoryid=1236&cs=1&p=0).  Each book is to be a season, but there's no timeframe given as to when the first season might happen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 19, 2007, 05:32:55 AM
I posted it in the Book thread. Wasn't sure where to put it.  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on January 22, 2007, 12:06:01 AM
Was it just me, or did they irreversibly fuck up Dresden Files in just one episode?  :|  Really disappointed with the changes they made.

Of course, I've only been through book 2.. are they perhaps starting after the books conclude?  I can't imagine that much changing. Gah, maybe it'll get better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 22, 2007, 03:59:22 AM
Rome season 2 is shaping to be better than the first. The guy playing Antony is perfect. I just hope the new guy they got to play the older Octavian (at least that's what I heard they were doing) is as good as that kid.

Lucius Verenus has tranformed into a Dark Pimp Lord from Hell. Awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on January 22, 2007, 04:16:13 AM
Decided to watch Weeds S1 because of the sale at Target (they have like 30 series at $17.99 for a season or two). Picked that up with some Roswell, Grey's Anatomy, and Dead Like Me. $80 for 4 box sets? Ok. But yea, Weeds was pretty damn great. I can deal without the housekeepers though. Short of that, the show is fantastic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on January 22, 2007, 07:35:27 AM
Was it just me, or did they irreversibly fuck up Dresden Files in just one episode?  :|  Really disappointed with the changes they made.

Of course, I've only been through book 2.. are they perhaps starting after the books conclude?  I can't imagine that much changing. Gah, maybe it'll get better.

Having read all the books, I was rather annoyed with all the changes they made, with most of them seeming pretty arbitrary.  And I had thought the premier was going to follow the plot of the first book, just to get into the swing of things.  Either way, I'm rather meh on it, but my GF liked it.  I'll keep watching to see where they go and if it gets better, but....I had higher hopes. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 22, 2007, 08:32:57 AM
Desden:  Not a bad show, has potential.
BSG: Still kicking ass, Caprica Six pwns,  D'anna gets pwned.  Baltar is still worthless and brillant. The stupid love square is still annoying.
Frisky Dingo: Great ending, but the kinda of ending where you doubt the show is going to be renewed.

Adultswim has really been sucking these days.  Smokingun, Assy, squidbillies, endless parade of FG and Futurama.  Actually I don't mind 'rama, but I figure most people are tired of it by now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 22, 2007, 09:59:56 AM
Adultswim has really been sucking these days.  Smokingun, Assy, squidbillies, endless parade of FG and Futurama.  Actually I don't mind 'rama, but I figure most people are tired of it by now.

But Dingo and Metalapocalypse have made up for the crappy new shows and the really shitty quality of Aqua Teen this year.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 22, 2007, 04:13:54 PM
The Cylon models changing allegiance every other episode is beginning to grate on me.  Never knowing for sure if it's Caprica Six, Boomer, etc only makes it worse.

I've also never been happy about the little insight into Cylon rebirth process.  I think it's been implied that they somehow share memories when they resurrect.  That would make more sense as to why they needed to box Xena's entire model line.  But if they share memories, wouldn't Athena have gained all the memories of Boomer?  Wouldn't those new memories drastically change who she is now?  Meh.

And the whole, "Oh look, another ancient relic we've just happened to stumble upon which is imminently important but never have talked about before just now, and won't again after this episode" is very snooze.  I get that it's supposed to be fate (or at least really, really look like it), but it feels like they're just trying to force the plot along.  Do not like.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 22, 2007, 07:52:59 PM
HIS FUCKING BROTHER IS THAT DOUCHE???  Lame.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 22, 2007, 09:24:08 PM
HIS FUCKING BROTHER IS THAT DOUCHE???  Lame.

Agreed. This season is not starting out well. I think last season was the pinnacle with Itzin and its heading way down hill from there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 22, 2007, 10:20:52 PM
I'll take a thousand flip-flop toasters over the hot-cold love affair between Major Douche and Caption Skanky.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 23, 2007, 02:36:29 AM
Who's watching Rome?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on January 23, 2007, 04:58:12 AM
Who's watching Rome?

I have a standing rule at my place:  all talking, fidgeting, and crinkling of popcorn bags will cease between the hours of 9:00 PM EST and 10:00 PM EST.  Anyone who disregards this rule will be punished.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 23, 2007, 09:33:15 AM
Who's watching Rome?

I am finally buying into the hype and watched Ep 14 last night. I am now hooked, but On Demand only goes back as far as Ep 9. I have been deeply in lust with Polly Walker since Patriot Games, so I was delighted to see her again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: RhyssaFireheart on January 23, 2007, 10:04:37 AM
Was it just me, or did they irreversibly fuck up Dresden Files in just one episode?  :|  Really disappointed with the changes they made.

Of course, I've only been through book 2.. are they perhaps starting after the books conclude?  I can't imagine that much changing. Gah, maybe it'll get better.

Having read all the books, I was rather annoyed with all the changes they made, with most of them seeming pretty arbitrary.  And I had thought the premier was going to follow the plot of the first book, just to get into the swing of things.  Either way, I'm rather meh on it, but my GF liked it.  I'll keep watching to see where they go and if it gets better, but....I had higher hopes. 

That's what I thought as well - they'd go with the book plots first.  I'm not entirely sure if I like it or not (I just can't seem to like the actor for some reason.) and the husband's mad because I won't let him delete the show off the DVR yet.  I can accept a few changes (like Bob being a person, as long as he has to get back into the skull) but some really do seem arbitrary.  Still working on the Karrin -> Connie change.  WTF was that done? 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 23, 2007, 01:45:20 PM
I think I'd enjoy Frisky Dingo if I smoked a bowl beforehand.  As it is, I just pretend it's Robot Chicken since I don't know what the fuck is going on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 23, 2007, 06:27:10 PM
Was it just me, or did they irreversibly fuck up Dresden Files in just one episode?  :|  Really disappointed with the changes they made.

Of course, I've only been through book 2.. are they perhaps starting after the books conclude?  I can't imagine that much changing. Gah, maybe it'll get better.

Having read all the books, I was rather annoyed with all the changes they made, with most of them seeming pretty arbitrary.  And I had thought the premier was going to follow the plot of the first book, just to get into the swing of things.  Either way, I'm rather meh on it, but my GF liked it.  I'll keep watching to see where they go and if it gets better, but....I had higher hopes. 

That's what I thought as well - they'd go with the book plots first.  I'm not entirely sure if I like it or not (I just can't seem to like the actor for some reason.) and the husband's mad because I won't let him delete the show off the DVR yet.  I can accept a few changes (like Bob being a person, as long as he has to get back into the skull) but some really do seem arbitrary.  Still working on the Karrin -> Connie change.  WTF was that done? 


The Jim Butcher official website has some interesting info on the adaption, like name/plot changes.  Supposedly,  there is Chicago cop named Karrin Murphy,  so they couldn't use the name in the series, for instance.

Some of the other changes were more stylistic,  like changing from a VW beetle to a WW2 surplus jeep.  Link to some podcast doohickey from Butcher on style changes:  http://www.jim-butcher.com/bb/index.php/topic,1651.0.html

It was alright,  but one of those shows that will sink or swim 5 or 10 episodes in.  Long as they stick to character development and intereaction,  and stay away from cheesy special effects, it might be decent.

I LOVE to read nerd fury about how their precious books are changed in the conversion from page to screen, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 24, 2007, 08:23:29 AM
Having never read the Dresden Files books, I liked the first episode. It felt like a cable horror/sci-fi show at times, but it didn't make me want to turn off. The whole set of characters could have used a better setup episode, though, as there were too many characters with connections that weren't explained. I'll keep watching, but I'm not totally sold yet.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on January 24, 2007, 08:47:00 AM
The whole set of characters could have used a better setup episode, though, as there were too many characters with connections that weren't explained.

It rather felt like a second episode of a series as opposed to the first.  Murphy was barely touched on, and all of Dresden's connections to people overall just seemed to be obliquely touched on.  Maybe it's a situation similar to Firefly, where there's an actual pilot that's been filmed that actually sets up everything, but they didn't open with it.  It just didn't have the flow of a first episode of a series, but more of just another installment.  I would think (hope) that they'd do Dresden as a serial drama type show, with overarching plots and continuity, and this episode did a pisspoor job of setting something like that up.  If they're not going to do that, and it'll be mostly episodic with little to no continuity, like ST: TNG or something, I doubt I'll be watching.  While the books are standalone in a way, they do build off of each other, with events in prior books having definite impacts on what's happening in the current one.  That's one of the things I like about it. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 24, 2007, 10:08:36 AM
Who's watching Rome?

I  missed too much of it, though what I've seen looks interesting. I'll probably do what I find myself doing more and more with television. Get it on DvD. In fact, a friend and I were talking the other day, it's almost better for us just to wait for DvD because then we can watch the episodes as quickly as we want and we have no commercials to deal with.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on January 24, 2007, 07:26:41 PM
and we have no commercials to deal with.

It's an HBO show, no commercials.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 25, 2007, 07:53:52 AM
and we have no commercials to deal with.

It's an HBO show, no commercials.

I know, I was speaking of TV shows in general.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 25, 2007, 09:17:41 AM
Commercials? That's what a DVR is for. Time Warner's last firmware update added 4x ff/rewind. Soooo fast. Real-time tv makes me ill, damned commercials.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 25, 2007, 02:11:14 PM
Commercials? That's what a DVR is for. Time Warner's last firmware update added 4x ff/rewind. Soooo fast. Real-time tv makes me ill, damned commercials.

Agreed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 25, 2007, 05:58:07 PM
Time Warner's last firmware update added 4x ff/rewind.

Wow.  You have the PS3 of cable boxes.  Welcome to 2005.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on January 25, 2007, 06:33:58 PM
I've actually started using my DVR to watch sports. I just start recording when the game starts and don't actually switch over until 30 minutes have gone by. I had to do it during the college bowl games because of that horrible freaking Dodge commercial with the stupid Rock'em'Sock'em robot hitting the truck EVERY BREAK!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 26, 2007, 05:47:32 AM
I've actually started using my DVR to watch sports. I just start recording when the game starts and don't actually switch over until 30 minutes have gone by. I had to do it during the college bowl games because of that horrible freaking Dodge commercial with the stupid Rock'em'Sock'em robot hitting the truck EVERY BREAK!

Yup, I do this too, had it timed so that by the time I caught up, it was beginning of 4th quarter.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 26, 2007, 08:00:02 AM
I've been Tivoing the sports since I got it. It makes sports so much better to watch. Skip commericals, skip huddles, skip the agonizing moments of crotch-scratching by the batters between pitches, skip halftime monkey spanking, skip timeouts, skip setting up free kicks, skip all the shit but what's important. It's a beautiful thing. I generally let the game get at least an hour or more before watching it, because I'm zipping through it without the huddles and such.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 26, 2007, 08:05:27 AM
I don't mind TiVoing other sports, but I have to watch my football live. I have too many people I call during games (or who call me); I gotta be on the same page as they are.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on January 26, 2007, 12:48:40 PM
I love watching Hockey DVR'd, but its a nighmare around here avoiding spoilers. I recorded a Canucks game one night while at a class, kept the radio off all the way home, made only one stop - 7-11. I looked in, there were no customers, just the clerk, who was East Indian. As a general rule around here, most East Indians don't follow hockey. First thing out of the guys mouth - "So I hear the Canucks lost bad tonight, huh?"

I've taken to preemptively cutting cashiers off and warning them not to say anything. Especially in the cold beer stores.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 26, 2007, 09:37:37 PM
I just updated my home computer, something I swore I wouldn't do for video games anymore.  The reason?  To get a TV Card & XP Media Center edition.   Zomg I'm in love.  Now I wish I'd bought 2 cards so I could recod 24 AND Heroes since they're on at the same time.  :x :|


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on January 28, 2007, 07:07:25 AM
24 - Bad season so far. Weak plot and weak acting from a team that has previously delivered. Every item in the plot so far is a rehashed version of something they've done before. It's also sending out right-wing political vibes at a more alarming rate:

* China is evil.
* Terrorist attacks by Middle Eastern people are a constant threat in the USA.
* Guantanamo is full of terrorsts who must not be released.
* Most Middle Eastern people you meet turn out to be terrorists in the end.
* Certain kinds of presidents will negotiate with terrorists (black? democrat?)
* Racial concentration camps, while controversial, are a useful tool.
* Small, tactical nukes are a useful weapon.

And counter-terrorist units watch Fox News.

Prison Break - The first season was excellent. I watched most of the second season in one sitting and found it excellent too, then read that most people were disappointed. Now that it has resumed, I'm still a fan. It needs to end soon though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 28, 2007, 07:16:15 PM
Rome -- First transitional/tying up loose ends episode, I guess.

The anticipation for Augustus Caesar is building up. Hope the new guy is just as good as the kid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on January 28, 2007, 08:36:50 PM
Rome -- First transitional/tying up loose ends episode, I guess.

The anticipation for Augustus Caesar is building up. Hope the new guy is just as good as the kid.

Yeah, that was the first Rome episode I've seen that I felt was a little bit substandard.  It had some moments, but overall it just seemed to be a little lacking.

I hope they casted older Octavian right, but I have my doubts.  Max Pirkis completely sold me on his characterization, and I don't see anyone doing the work he's already done justice.  I actually pity the guy they hired as a replacement.  That's got to be like following Jimi Hendrix when you're a ukulele player.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 29, 2007, 03:11:33 AM
24 - Bad season so far. Weak plot and weak acting from a team that has previously delivered. Every item in the plot so far is a rehashed version of something they've done before. It's also sending out right-wing political vibes at a more alarming rate:

Sorry, but I've always found this "24 is right-wing propaganda" to be complete bullshit.  I sit every week on the most liberal law school campus in the most liberal city in America watching 24 in a dorm with about a dozen very left-wing fellow fans.  Sorry to sirbruce this, but judging by your comments its almost like you've never seen the show before this season.   

Quote
* China is evil.

Jack killed their ambassador, remember?  And the U.S. government refused to hand him over.  Its also not a slanderous lie that China uses torture on dissidents.  The show shows about every episode that while China may torture, SO DO WE.   

Quote
* Terrorist attacks by Middle Eastern people are a constant threat in the USA.
* Guantanamo is full of terrorsts who must not be released.
* Most Middle Eastern people you meet turn out to be terrorists in the end.

Last season was about white Chechnyan terrorists, and a white president ordering terrorism and killing a successful and beloved former black President (using Graham, another white guy).  And do you recall the last time Muslims were used, when Audrey's sister and the Muslim guy were getting married?  Who turned out to be the terrorist then?  Do we really have to go back through every season and show all the non-Arabic villains?

Quote
* Certain kinds of presidents will negotiate with terrorists (black? democrat?)

See my last point.  Have you noticed that all the Republican presidents portrayed have pretty well been fuckups (keeler, logan?).  And remember the season where all of Palmer's white generals wanted to nuke the entire ME, but he believed Jack and averted thermonuclear war?  And who is the president's scheming, evil adviser now?  You are basically asserting that "showing weak black president" equals "showing a black president who isn't angelic and perfect in every way".  Remember that the man is in the shadow of his brother, and maybe was elevated to a position he wouldn't have reached otherwise. That's just realism, not racism.
[/quote]

Quote
* Racial concentration camps, while controversial, are a useful tool.

Are you joking?  The episodes so far have done everything but scream "THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL AND FASCIST AND OUT OF CONTROL".  Do you remember the plot point where Waleed was beaten and thrown in there for no reason?  Can you really take dialogue like "Not a single Japanase interned was found to have been part of a plot against America"..."Not that we KNOW OF, Mr. President" as right-wing propaganda instead of ridiculing the right?  I can't believe anyone is that devoid of sarchas-dar. 

Quote
* Small, tactical nukes are a useful weapon.

I don't even know what you are trying to say here.  They weren't used by the U.S., they were used against us.  If anything, you should be criticizing the fact that they are shown to be effective, because that will give terrorists the idea. 

However, we do agree that as a show the season sucks this year.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on January 29, 2007, 03:42:55 AM
Sorry, but I've always found this "24 is right-wing propaganda" to be complete bullshit.  I sit every week on the most liberal law school campus in the most liberal city in America watching 24 in a dorm with about a dozen very left-wing fellow fans.  Sorry to sirbruce this, but judging by your comments its almost like you've never seen the show before this season.   

I'm not going to debate political specifics with you. This is the television thread, all I was doing was posting my opinion of the TV show.

In answer to your presumption that I haven't watched 24 in the past, I've seen all of seasons 1, 2 and 5. I really enjoyed those. There was some right-wing propaganda in them, but nothing that really bothered me. But I just think series 6, apart from the weak plot and bad acting, is further weakened by going far further to the right than ever.

I presume you're aware that Joel Surnow (co-creator of 24) - described as "a right-wing fanatic" by Neal Gabler on Fox after having dinner with him - is currently wearing two production hats? One is 24, the other is a right-wing version of the Daily Show that he proposed and devised for Fox.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 31, 2007, 08:38:21 AM
I finally finished watching The Lost Room on my Tivo and holy shit that was a good mini-series. There's talk about it being a pilot for a regular show, but the numbers were only so-so. I'm sure the Sci-Fi/USA execs will decide not to make it into a series but they should. That was fantastic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 31, 2007, 01:56:16 PM
I'm so ignoring that BSG thread over there. Season 3 in HD just started last saturday night.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 31, 2007, 09:48:15 PM
Quote
I sit every week on the most liberal law school campus in the most liberal city in America watching 24 in a dorm with about a dozen very left-wing fellow fans.

You go to Cornell University in Ithaca NY?

I've lived in Cambridge and Ithaca, it's no contest. Cambridge can't even sniff Ithaca. Ithaca has its own currency!

---

I've never understood anyone liking 24 in the first place, the show is just silly. The first season was a horrendous collection of cliches, predictable moments, Kim running out of the frying pan and into the fire over and over again...in my mind I group it with Lost as "shows that obviously suck but for whatever reason appeal to a huge number of people."

Edit: Funny link: http://www.freerepublic.com/~behindliberallines/

Is this serious or not? I have no idea, it is pretty hilariously stupid though. Oh no, solar panels! A school where each child gets individual attention! People not voting for the worst President in history! NOOOO! We Ithaca commies also brought you a coed University in 1865 - EVIL!

Not to make this too political (too late!) but it really scares me that places like Ithaca and Cambridge are considered super-liberal when they should be just slightly left of center. If you think Cambridge is some crazy beatnik liberal hangout go spend 5 minutes at the Plough and Stars or Cantab Lounge, it has plenty of crusty conservatives.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 01, 2007, 07:06:43 AM
I'd move to Ithica. Close to home, nicer community than the dumpster thugs around here.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 01, 2007, 08:26:29 AM
I've never understood anyone liking 24 in the first place, the show is just silly. The first season was a horrendous collection of cliches, predictable moments, Kim running out of the frying pan and into the fire over and over again...in my mind I group it with Lost as "shows that obviously suck but for whatever reason appeal to a huge number of people."

Meh, 24 was ok the first two seasons, but by the 3rd I felt like they were recycling everything from the past 2 seasons, just with new bad guys. I stopped watching. I'm still watching Lost and can't understand why people hate it so much.

Quote
Edit: Funny link: http://www.freerepublic.com/~behindliberallines/

Those cunts should avail themselves of some of that liberal commie edumacation. They misspelled gamut.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 01, 2007, 10:14:08 AM
Last season was really good primarily due to the performances of Gregory Itzin and Jean Smart (plus some good William Devain schene chewing). So far this season sucks balls.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 01, 2007, 09:18:51 PM
This new Sarah Silverman show is terrible.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on February 01, 2007, 10:02:55 PM
Terribly awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on February 02, 2007, 04:58:37 AM
The 10 mins I watched were funny.  But then I passed out, so ymmv.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 05, 2007, 01:42:33 PM
Doesn't anyone else use the DVR to make your own calls over the refs' halfassed drunken guesses?

I think we have managed to watch all of the Metalocalypse episodes.  I never thought that I would ever see my wife laugh at someone being horribly mutiliated.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on February 05, 2007, 09:24:33 PM
24 picked it up a bit tonight.  Although everybody I watched with guessed the "who is the engineer" thing 10 minutes before it happened, the rest was fun.  The dad thing at the end surprised me, the Vice President looks appropriately evil, and the President gave an incredibly clunky speech that just screamed "Someone in the Cabinet ally with Lennox to shoot me pls".  Things are looking up. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 06, 2007, 01:35:15 AM
I wonder if EO 1066 was an intentional nod to EO 9066.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 06, 2007, 08:37:09 AM
Doesn't anyone else use the DVR to make your own calls over the refs' halfassed drunken guesses?

Yes. Or just to get a replay before the official replays. And mostly, to fast forward through the endless replays shown when a challenge is made with idiotic voiceovers from the broadcastes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 06, 2007, 08:48:35 AM
Yeah, I use the DVR a lot watching football. We rewind a lot of plays and talk about what different players are doing, good moves by linemen, players out of position, etc. It's one of the coolest things evar imo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 06, 2007, 11:18:00 AM
We just need a teleprompter to go with it.  All the running up to the screen and pointing while trying to scream in the other person's ear just how blind they are is rather difficult.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 06, 2007, 12:02:56 PM
Maybe a laser pointer...but we don't really yell at each other. We do rarely disagree...but with gigantovision, the plays are pretty obvious :P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Polysorbate80 on February 06, 2007, 02:11:56 PM
We just need a teleprompter to go with it.  All the running up to the screen and pointing while trying to scream in the other person's ear just how blind they are is rather difficult.

You mean a Telestrator?  That's the tool for sketching on the screen.

A Teleprompter is used to display scripts for the dolts sitting in front of the camera.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 06, 2007, 07:10:50 PM
Hmm yeah, that thing.  The thing where I can draw a big arrow at someone's foot and write OUT OF BOUNDS on the screen.  Bonus points for having an attached air horn.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on February 07, 2007, 04:14:51 AM
24 picked it up a bit tonight.  Although everybody I watched with guessed the "who is the engineer" thing 10 minutes before it happened, the rest was fun.  The dad thing at the end surprised me, the Vice President looks appropriately evil, and the President gave an incredibly clunky speech that just screamed "Someone in the Cabinet ally with Lennox to shoot me pls".  Things are looking up. 

You and I seem to disagree on everything 24, but I can't understand why anyone could fail to call it drivel.

The scriptwriting was appalling. There were lines and lines of the campest, cheesiest, worst acted dialogue ever spoken in 24.

How could you not pick the dad thing when he murdered his own already-beaten guard? (Jack's mild reaction was lame)

I don't think the incredibly clunky presidential speech was anything but bad scriptwriting.

And the right-wing message was delivered again - the US uses chemical torture of terrorism suspects. In early 24s, Jack was pushing the envelope with his methods. Now, it's standard practice with a support team of torture experts and injections on hand.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 07, 2007, 07:42:45 AM
Powers Booth's jaw clenching was indeed riveting though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 07, 2007, 08:34:42 AM
You see what you want to see with 24, I suppose.   I don't see any right-wing messages, if anything I've been seeing a, "Look how bad it COULD get. We're not there yet, let's not let it get there, and stop all this fear-mongering in reality kplzthx" message.  Something much more moderate/ leftist thorugh the use of showing extreme-right politics 'in action' and how things still go to shit/ produce no results.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 07, 2007, 10:33:22 AM
"Didn't Ben Franklin have syphilis?"

God The Office rules.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 07, 2007, 11:26:35 AM
"Didn't Ben Franklin have syphilis?"

God The Office rules.
Yes. Yes it does. I like the american version even better than the UK version (and I liked that alot). Sometimes I wonder if they have a writer that works in our office.

"What up, spinstahs?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on February 07, 2007, 01:01:42 PM
if anything I've been seeing a, "Look how bad it COULD get. We're not there yet, let's not let it get there, and stop all this fear-mongering in reality kplzthx" message

As a series made by an ultra-conservative friend of Rush Limbaugh, I seriously doubt 24 is trying to say "stop all this fear-mongering in reality". I hope it's giving that message, but it's sure as hell not intended :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 09, 2007, 01:32:16 PM
Long ass article on the politics of 24 and its effects (http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070219fa_fact_mayer)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 09, 2007, 01:36:19 PM
The Office again-

Seeing Ryan bat the bouquet away from Kelly may be the funniest thing I have seen in ages.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 09, 2007, 02:02:57 PM
Long ass article on the politics of 24 and its effects (http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070219fa_fact_mayer)

Wow. I have never seen 24, but planned to eventually pick up the DVDs and check it out. After reading that, I might just skip it. Not really a fan of putting money in the pockets of people like Joel Surnow.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on February 09, 2007, 03:04:00 PM
The Office again-

Seeing Ryan bat the bouquet away from Kelly may be the funniest thing I have seen in ages.

That was an interesting episode.  There were a lot cringe-it's-Michael scenes, but a lot of gold too.  Had a feeling Jim wouldn't take Pam leaving with Ray well.

The Pavolvian experiment at the start was just awesome.  I was dying.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 09, 2007, 03:34:37 PM
Haha ya! I love how Jim is just bored out of his mind, but finds novel ways to entertain himself. They need to have an ep where Jim finds a website that Dwight posts on and then trolls him with all sorts of personal details  :-D


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 11, 2007, 10:25:20 PM
Does anyone watch Extras (HBO/Gervais)?

Great show  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 12, 2007, 06:29:27 AM
The Office again-

Seeing Ryan bat the bouquet away from Kelly may be the funniest thing I have seen in ages.
I was crying I laughed so hard. My girlfriend believes we are Jim and Pam (and she may have valid reasons for such since we work in the same office)...they showed Pam's car on the last episode and it's the same she drives. Getting creepy imo.
Quote
Does anyone watch Extras (HBO/Gervais)?
Saw the last one and put it on the expanding DVR queue. We're having a laugh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on February 12, 2007, 08:13:58 AM
Rome is so great.  On episode 4 of the second season and loving it so damn much.  Had to watch a few episodes of last season again to remember what's going on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 12, 2007, 08:23:28 AM
That was an interesting episode.  There were a lot cringe-it's-Michael scenes, but a lot of gold too.  Had a feeling Jim wouldn't take Pam leaving with Ray well.

I'm betting on a Pam/Roy wedding as this season's cliffhanger finale. They have got to milk the Pam/Jim relationship for all its worth, as I'm sure it's a big female draw.

Jim's practical jokes are just hysterical, made even more so because I used to be friends with a guy that was astonishingly similar to Dwight.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 12, 2007, 09:52:28 AM
Rome is so great.  On episode 4 of the second season and loving it so damn much.  Had to watch a few episodes of last season again to remember what's going on.

I am utterly in love with Atia. She is such a scheming c*nt...you gotta love her!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 12, 2007, 12:57:40 PM
Does anyone watch Extras (HBO/Gervais)?

I just want to see the one with Bowie.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 12, 2007, 01:04:14 PM
Last night had Ian McKellan. Gervais was cast in one of his plays. Turned out to be some gay romp story. Funny ensues.


Atia is definitely a scheming witch. Especially the episode before the last.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 12, 2007, 01:08:54 PM
I personally dislike the grammies (My Humps? Really?), but my girlfriend likes to watch them. She was good enough not to watch it while I was in the room, but I'm glad she left it on when she left last night. Awesome tribute to James Brown, they had his MC guy (who's name I don't know) come out and hang his cape on a mic stand.

Also, Smokey Robinson has been hanging out with Kenny Rogers, apparently. His plastic surgeon, at least.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on February 12, 2007, 06:37:09 PM
I personally dislike the grammies (My Humps? Really?), but my girlfriend likes to watch them. She was good enough not to watch it while I was in the room, but I'm glad she left it on when she left last night. Awesome tribute to James Brown, they had his MC guy (who's name I don't know) come out and hang his cape on a mic stand.

Also, Smokey Robinson has been hanging out with Kenny Rogers, apparently. His plastic surgeon, at least.
The Grammys were actually pretty good this year if only for the first 3 minutes when The Police performed Roxanne -- damn they sounded good *and* they are going on tour! I liked the performances by Corinne Bailey Rae and John Legend, two people I'd never heard of before until yesterday. That girl that won that contest to sing with Justin Timberlake sounded surprisingly good, though she dances like a white person (she's black). I'm glad the Dixie Chicks made a clean sweep of things as well.

Edit: typos


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 12, 2007, 08:02:52 PM
The whats?

I was watching Simpsons,King of the Hill, Family Guy, American Dad & BSG.  I haven't a clue what the rest of you were doing, but it sounds like it had to do with giving control of the TV to the wife.  For shame.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Llava on February 12, 2007, 08:24:45 PM
I was at the Tempe Improv watching Greg Behrendt (http://www.gregbehrendt.com/media/video/colbert.mov) do stand-up.  He rocked, and this was his first show in like 2 or 3 years.  I didn't even realize it was Grammy night, and when I found out I gave this much of a shit:
|-|

That's not much.  In fact, it's very little.  Practically none.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 13, 2007, 01:36:04 PM
I bet Cheddar watches the Greg Behrendt Show.  Unless, of course, it is on at the same time as The View.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on February 13, 2007, 02:13:11 PM
Zing!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 14, 2007, 07:52:23 AM
The whats?

I was watching Simpsons,King of the Hill, Family Guy, American Dad & BSG.  I haven't a clue what the rest of you were doing, but it sounds like it had to do with giving control of the TV to the wife.  For shame.

My wife watches what you watch.  Add some Frisky Dingo, Venture Bros. and Metalocalypse for total compliance.  She's awesome.

I don't like The Simpsons or King of the Hill anymore.  I'm done.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: eldaec on February 15, 2007, 06:53:44 AM
Long ass article on the politics of 24 and its effects (http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070219fa_fact_mayer)

Wow. I have never seen 24, but planned to eventually pick up the DVDs and check it out. After reading that, I might just skip it. Not really a fan of putting money in the pockets of people like Joel Surnow.

You should pick up season 1 anyway.

Season 1 is largely devoid of the political background that sneaks into later seasons. If anything, the first season leans toward the liberal, wheras later seasons tend to use the torture plot device as a crutch (though the big-business-secret-government-conspiracy-plot-lines still come up a lot as well).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 15, 2007, 11:38:35 AM
You guys are killing me with the BSG thread btw   :|

Spoilery, if a bit delayed:

Season three is totally great, I'm glad I gave the show a chance when they started airing it on UniHD. Last saturday was the ep where Ellen got busted, Chief saves his old lady, Boomer finds out her kid may have lived, and Adama ends the ep with the command to go to New Caprica. Holy shitballs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 15, 2007, 12:17:53 PM
One of the cooler shows I've seen lately was on the History Channel.  Didn't catch the name of it, unfortunately, as I only got to see bits and pieces of it.  Anyway, they had interviews with retired Navy / Air Force pilots, and using computer graphics re-enacted dog fights during the Vietnam War (Crusaders vs MiGs).  I've seen parts of it twice, but can't seem to catch it from start to finish.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on February 15, 2007, 12:47:20 PM
Sounds like Dogfights.

History Channel has been right up my alley as of late.  The special on the sinking of the Bismarck, which I think was  Dogfights, the shows about Carthage, Templar contruction and Greek engineering have kept me seeing a lot more of the history channel's logo on my Tivo.

M3  and Beyond Top Secret anr nice, but they make me want to fact check everything  I don't have enough time to do that as I'd like.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 15, 2007, 12:56:58 PM
They had a good history of snipers yesterday.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 15, 2007, 01:16:57 PM
They had a good history of snipers yesterday.

I DID catch that.  The one where they went through the history of the M-1 Garrand (sp??), M-14, M-16 and other weapons was pretty interesting as well.

Quote from: sigil
Sounds like Dogfights.
 

Very cool.  I'll be sure to look for it more often. 

Quote from: sigil
History Channel has been right up my alley as of late

Same here.  Some really good shows the last few weeks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on February 15, 2007, 02:24:16 PM
I've caught something called "Fight Science" a few times. I don't know if it's just the one special, or a series that I somehow keep catching the exact same half-episode of.

Seemed very interesting, but I felt they could do more with it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 15, 2007, 08:13:21 PM
I've enjoyed the History Channel series hosted by Peter Weller about ancient engineering quite a bit.  Covers alot of interesting ground,  and it's fucking Robocop. 

I burst out laughing at least once an episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 15, 2007, 08:40:15 PM
For fresh laugh-out-loud-ness, we have started watching Dirty Jobs.  It is actually the host, Mike Rowe, that is the funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 15, 2007, 08:45:46 PM
I burst out laughing at least once an episode.

Not sure what you're laughing at, but he gets pretty psyched up sometimes and uses a lot of non-academic lingo. So I think he's funny for that.


As for documentaries, there was a good series on Discovery Science recently called 2057. It should rerun soon.

Basically, it's a combination of interviews and well produced dramatizations of what life will be like 50 years from now. Futurism, but with a highly educated bent. The main narrator is Michio Kaku (probably the only physicist on earth who can actually talk to laymen, without dumbing things down too much). It covers a wide variety of subjects like the energy crisis, future weaponry and armor, cyber crimes, whatever.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 15, 2007, 08:57:32 PM
2057 can bite by ass.  I'm still angry about previous versions of that program and how they turned out to be TOTAL LIES.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 15, 2007, 10:28:45 PM
I've enjoyed the History Channel series hosted by Peter Weller about ancient engineering quite a bit.  Covers alot of interesting ground,  and it's fucking Robocop. 

I burst out laughing at least once an episode.

I read somewhere that Weller is getting his PhD in Renaissance art and lectures at Syracuse.  Who'da thunk it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 15, 2007, 11:35:57 PM
Yeah, I heard he has or is getting some sort of serious credentials.

"Bitches out!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 16, 2007, 04:25:39 AM
Earlier in this thread I think I mention he has a Masters in History,  and is a part-time lecturer at Syracuse University.

He'll always be Robocop to me, though.  "I'd buy that for a dollar!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 16, 2007, 12:35:42 PM
"I'd buy that for a dollar!"

I thought that was "The Running Man".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on February 16, 2007, 01:01:10 PM
No that was, "Who loves you?" and "Who do you love?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 16, 2007, 03:21:28 PM
I believe it is "bitches leave."


Earlier in this thread I think I mention he has a Masters in History,  and is a part-time lecturer at Syracuse University.

Woops. I think I read it first in Wired magazine (hey, I got it free) but sorry for being repetitive.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 16, 2007, 03:51:10 PM
I also wanted to say that The Office last night was hilarious, especially Michael's lecture (although it also had more pathos than this version usually has).

It was directed by Joss Whedon which is somewhat odd.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Gutboy Barrelhouse on February 16, 2007, 04:26:23 PM
On a sad note:

BOISE, Idaho (AP) -- Hit the mute button for a moment of silence: The co-inventor of the TV remote has died.

Robert Adler, who won an Emmy Award along with fellow engineer Eugene Polley for the device that made couch potatoship possible, died Thursday of heart failure at a Boise nursing home at 93, Zenith Electronics Corp. said Friday.

In his six-decade career with Zenith, Adler was a prolific inventor, earning more than 180 U.S. patents. He was best known for his 1956 Zenith Space Command remote control, which helped make TV a truly sedentary pastime.

The National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences awarded Adler and co-inventor Polley, another Zenith engineer, an Emmy in 1997 for the landmark invention.

Adler joined Zenith's research division in 1941 after earning a doctorate in physics from the University of Vienna. He retired as research vice president in 1979, and served as a technical consultant until 1999, when Zenith merged with LG Electronics Inc.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published his most recent patent application, for advances in touch screen technology, on February 1.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 16, 2007, 05:55:58 PM
I believe it is "bitches leave."

Red Forman does indeed say "Bitches leave".



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 16, 2007, 09:26:31 PM
For fresh laugh-out-loud-ness, we have started watching Dirty Jobs.  It is actually the host, Mike Rowe, that is the funny.

Absolutely one of the best shows on TV, IMHO.  He's a great 'storyteller', if that label can be applied to him.  He seems like he would be a blast to have more than a few beers with.  The monkey episode is hands down one of the best he's done.

Edit:  I would LOVE to see the unedited outtakes from that show


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 16, 2007, 11:46:36 PM
Fuck yeah it is "bitches leave."

Got it confused with T2 where Robert Patrick deadpans "get...out..." to the helicopter pilot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on February 18, 2007, 03:58:16 PM
I also wanted to say that The Office last night was hilarious, especially Michael's lecture (although it also had more pathos than this version usually has).

It was directed by Joss Whedon which is somewhat odd.

So THAT's where the vampire stuff came from  8-)  I love the office, although I wish they'd lay off the Pam/Roy/Jim/Karen crap for awhile.  Its obvious that it was cruising toward a resolution and then the producers went "Oh shit, our show isn't canceled yet, now we can't resolve it for 4 years, better put everything back". 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Arthur_Parker on February 19, 2007, 07:30:22 AM
Anyone see Top Gear?  Last night's show featured a British space shuttle. (http://www.topgear.com/content/features/stories/2007/02/stories/03/1.html)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 19, 2007, 08:16:24 AM
I love the office, although I wish they'd lay off the Pam/Roy/Jim/Karen crap for awhile. 

I'm telling you, get settled in for the long haul on that storyline. Pam and Roy WILL get married or have a wedding as the cliffhanger for this season. I can feel it in my bones. That's the hook that keeps the women viewers involved, at least in the minds of the producers I'm sure. It's a good relationship, has a lot of chemisty, something they probably didn't plan on when they started. That's going to be the hook. They're already renewed for a 3rd season (and have been since they renewed the 2nd season) so I'm sure they've been planned out for a while.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on February 21, 2007, 08:30:59 AM
I don't know if it's the new actor, the writing, or both, but I am not digging the new Augustus on Rome.  Perhaps the old Augustus was too clever all the time, but spending so much screentime beating us over the head with his cluelessness re: all things military is weakening his character too much imo.

I loved seeing the old physchopath Pullo back though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 21, 2007, 09:24:33 AM
I thought the time he screwed over Cicero in the Senate was a good moment (episode before last, I think?).

The younger kid was much better though. Besides Pullo, I think he was the best element of the show.

Back to the older Octavian: I was under the impression that the real Octavian wasn't exactly a genius in the military department. He depended on generals, and his greatest victory (Actium) was due to an informant (EDIT: And a zerg).


I loved seeing the old physchopath Pullo back though.

That last episode was surreal.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on February 22, 2007, 04:27:33 AM
I loved just before he killed Cicero, "You will achieve immortality. My name will be recorded in history and so will the name of my killer."

"Oh you mean history, I thought... nevermind."

Now we just need to wait for Cleopatra to return, I want to see Attia get burned by Anthony.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 26, 2007, 01:05:09 AM
WTF? What happened to Rome? No show tonight, and no shows scheduled on their site for awhile. Season 2 can't be over yet, can it?

And if they just skipped last night's episode for the Academy Awards, that REALLY pisses me off. I'm happy for Scorsese, but I piss on that crap. This is HBO damnit -- Just air the episode. It repeats several times after that anyways. It's not like it's one of the big networks where if someone misses something, they'll never get to see it again.

I have nothing now, except tomorrow's Heroes episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on February 26, 2007, 07:45:42 AM
A slow week might be a good thing for me.  My DVR's starting to get a bit congested.

Rome's only got 4 episodes left, btw.

So.. looks like they already canceled or sent Studio 60 to pasture? Can't say I'm surprised, even though I watch it and occasionally enjoy the endeavor.  When a show goes from being about bad comedy to being about bad romances and no one's watching?  Not good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on February 26, 2007, 07:57:29 AM
So.. looks like they already canceled or sent Studio 60 to pasture? Can't say I'm surprised, even though I watch it and occasionally enjoy the endeavor.  When a show goes from being about bad comedy to being about bad romances and no one's watching?  Not good.
They ordered up a full season (22 episodes) of Studio 60 but yeah its ratings keep languishing despite the lead in from Heroes so they are giving The Donnelly's or whatever it's called its trial run sooner rather than later (was supposed to be later in March, I believe).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on February 26, 2007, 10:52:44 PM
Spring training is starting soon, so at least that may save me from some of crap I've seen out there. I still watch LOST, but I've got the same relationship with that show I had with DAOC for two years, so that's nothing new. I just make sure to hide the bruises better now.

I started watching NCIS because it amused me, and I'm pretty happy with that show. Crazy goth chick is pretty funny and has her hot moments, and the "Israeli" chick is smoking, but oddly cast since the actress is actually from Chile. I'm guessing it would have been hard to take Sarah Silverman seriously in the role.

I find myself watching Netflix more these days than TV, but I don't have HBO, and that seems to be where most of your topics come from.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on February 27, 2007, 06:24:24 AM
"I'd buy that for a dollar!"

I thought that was "The Running Man".

Nope, it was robocop. It is on that crazy tv show that seems to play alot on tvs in the background.

Well is in two of my all-time fave sci-fi movies. Robocop and Screamers, though the last is admittedly a guilty pleasure.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 27, 2007, 11:23:51 AM
You sure it wasn't Total Recall?  That general timeframe is a blur to me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 27, 2007, 11:25:01 AM
Definitely Robocop.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 27, 2007, 11:32:36 AM
Yep, Robocop. Background TV shots of the crazy salesmen guy with two hotties in each hand saying "I'd buy that for a dollar!!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daoV-LsINiA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daoV-LsINiA)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xilren's Twin on February 28, 2007, 03:00:02 PM
For those who may have read some of the books but not caught the show, SciFi is showing the first 5 episodes ofthe Dresden Files (http://www.scifi.com/dresden/) series tonight at 7pm.  While not exactly true to the source materials, it's not bad; been DVR'ing them.

Xilren


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 04, 2007, 10:03:19 PM
I watched "The Winner" in it's debut tonight.

Once again the laughtrack was really really bad in these types of shows. Please, tone that shit back so we don't notice it when your joke fails. The scenes with his parents were NEVER funny. At all. That's a lost cause, please dump those scenes or retool the concept.

However, the show is not without merit. It's a lot like the 40-year-old virgin except it expands more on the premise outside of just sex. It goes into the comedy of a man reaching adolescence at age 32, and meeting a common friend in the woman's son that he's interested in. They both go through dual experiences of not knowing what the hell to do with the opposite sex, and it's extremely funny in certain situations. The casting of his love interest, her son, and Rob Courdry as the main character are all spot on, and they perform well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on March 05, 2007, 07:23:33 AM
Great new show on HGTV or DIY or one of those channels called Secret Spaces, all about secret doors and chambers in people's houses. Being one of my favorite subjects, I was enthralled. Amazing show, lots of good ideas. My favorite was a chess set where placing certain pieces in a certain configuration triggered the door latch.

Also had RG's pad in Austin! I want his science room imo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on March 05, 2007, 12:19:28 PM
Thursday night, the Sarah Silverman Program debuted up here. Was no advertising for it at all, I only found out due to a blurb in the local paper. It's playing Thursday nights at 10:30 on the Comedy Netwok here. It wasn't even listed on my PVR's guide at the time.

All I can say is, that woman is fucked up royally, and damn do I lover her for it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 15, 2007, 08:05:29 PM
Because I despise basketball, I watched both Andy Richter and Jeff Goldbloom's new shows.  Richter's was 'meh'  it's the usual Andy Richter stuff, teetering on the edge of brillantly bizarre but never going over the edge and blossoming.  Then again I've always felt that way about him, he seems destined to be "Mr. Almost but not quite."

 Goldbloom's show was far too interesting for it to become popular, which is unfortunate because it was pretty good.  I liked the take of a detective coming back after his parter's death, but he visualizes and talks-to the victims (and his ex partner) to work through the case.  It's like a mix of CSI, and Ghost Whisperer, but without the boobs and JLH's extra-large head.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on March 15, 2007, 11:06:41 PM
Goldbloom's show was far too interesting for it to become popular, which is unfortunate because it was pretty good.  I liked the take of a detective coming back after his parter's death, but he visualizes and talks-to the victims (and his ex partner) to work through the case.  It's like a mix of CSI, and Ghost Whisperer, but without the boobs and JLH's extra-large head.
It's not really a forensics show. It's more like generic detective show meets The Sixth Sense/Ghost Whisperer/Tru Calling/et al. It wasn't too bad, though. The "No hablo engles" episode could be funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 16, 2007, 05:34:58 AM
Good point, I don't know why I said CSI, other than it was on my mind because it wasn't on last night.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ozzu on March 17, 2007, 05:05:46 AM
For fresh laugh-out-loud-ness, we have started watching Dirty Jobs.  It is actually the host, Mike Rowe, that is the funny.

Absolutely one of the best shows on TV, IMHO.  He's a great 'storyteller', if that label can be applied to him.  He seems like he would be a blast to have more than a few beers with.  The monkey episode is hands down one of the best he's done.

Edit:  I would LOVE to see the unedited outtakes from that show

QFT.  :-D Also, I've mentioned it before, but Mythbusters is way way up there on the list of great shows. The myths are just as good as the early myths and the show is much funnier now that the crew has been together for a while. Hell, I'd just watch to see what shirt Adam will be wearing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 17, 2007, 09:35:39 AM
I hate the Mythbusters "B team".  The rest of the show is golden.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on March 19, 2007, 09:26:53 AM
I hate the Mythbusters "B team".  The rest of the show is golden.

I don't mind Tory or Kari (she is just so damned cute), but Grant is SUCH a dork.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 19, 2007, 10:49:24 AM
Come on, Grant's dorkiness carries the build team.  Tory is the one that has his balls electrocuted and Keri is the one that paints things, which leaves Grant to do the actual enginering.  There's also the girl that does the welding, forget her name, but she's good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on March 19, 2007, 11:06:38 AM
She seems to have been bumped from on camera work for the most part for some reason. I can't remember her name either...

Is one of my favorite shows, though.

Oh, and yes, Keri Byron makes the build team worth watching all by her perky self.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on March 19, 2007, 11:22:05 AM
Welding chick is Jess, IIRC. She was in the dog episode briefly as the judge of the dog show. Kind of a butterface  :-D


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 19, 2007, 11:36:49 AM
She's the one who went into the MRI on the "tatoos explode in a MRI" episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 20, 2007, 10:03:03 AM
I don't think Ninja Warrior has been mentioned here.  It's on G4 so I'd suggest using a TiVo to watch it, but it's good fun.  The summary is that it's a Japanese show called Sasuke, with an obstacle course in four stages, some parts of which look like something a ninja would be expected to do.  The first stage generally reduces the number of contestatns from one hundred to ten; this is the "William Hung" portion of the show.  Even better, there are recurring failures who just want to be on TV.  Stage two is even harder, and stage three is ridiculous.  Apparently it's been going on since at least 1998 and so far only one guy has gotten to the end.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja_Warrior


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 21, 2007, 08:04:05 PM
Lost is really starting to pick up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 21, 2007, 08:32:09 PM
I read that as "Loot is really starting to pick up".  Twice.  /sadf


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 21, 2007, 09:06:42 PM
Lost is really starting to pick up.

Yeah, it is. In ways that I honestly can say I never saw coming at all. Still, they aren't answering any questions, they are just revealing things you didn't really give a shit about in the first place. Oooooooh, so that's how Locke broke his back. Who gives a shit?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 22, 2007, 07:31:34 AM
Lost is really starting to pick up.

Yes. I think they finally have a destination they are moving towards and I like where it's heading, especially with Locke's character. Needs more Sayeed ass-whooping though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 22, 2007, 09:51:44 AM
Lost is really starting to pick up.

Yeah, it is. In ways that I honestly can say I never saw coming at all. Still, they aren't answering any questions, they are just revealing things you didn't really give a shit about in the first place. Oooooooh, so that's how Locke broke his back. Who gives a shit?

You may not care about the how, but it's significant to the character, his evolviing story and "the magic box" (which apparently IS very large) why it happened and who did it.

How many more new episodes this season, though?  5? 6?  I see this going the same place it did last year.. almost but not quite giving us answers, then stringing us along some new direction next season.  Grr.  :x


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 22, 2007, 10:11:50 AM
Is it a real magic box, or a clever turn of phrase on Ben's part because he had Locke's dad and knew it'd be Locke's dream come true?  Ben is too slippery to take anything at face value.  Although it would explain why the Others live so well, but why didn't they repair the communications. 

And the preview for next week was even more puzzling.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on March 23, 2007, 08:54:56 AM
G4 makes me wish it were possible to kick a tv network in the balls.

Destroy TechTV and solid programming like Screen Savers and Call for Help. Then air only G4-format 'tech' shows (vapid trendycool young hipsters). At 2am for an hour. Then fill the bulk of the day with Star Trek reruns and other syndicated garbage that has nothing to do with gaming.

Comcast took a decent tech channel (and a crappy gaming channel) and destroyed both of them, a ghetto Spike or summat.

Bah. Right in the nuts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 23, 2007, 06:07:26 PM
I usually enjoy AMC ignoring the whole "Classics" part of their name...

but "Catwoman?"

W. T. F.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on March 23, 2007, 06:10:49 PM
Well at least they showed Conan first, CROM.   Since catwoman came on I've gotten alot of stuff done at the house :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 26, 2007, 09:18:00 AM
I usually enjoy AMC ignoring the whole "Classics" part of their name...

but "Catwoman?"

W. T. F.

I saw that on the guide and had a similar WTF moment. Catwoman is like cancer, it does nothing for the viewer except eat away at the very physical fabric of their being. I mean, ok, some of the more recent things they've shown could be considered a Classic, but shouldn't a classic be at least 5-10 years old and not, you know, suck more nuts than a gaggle of crack whores?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on March 26, 2007, 10:37:44 AM
There is a god! (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/03/26/bc.fbn.mondaynightfootb.ap/index.html) Now, if only someone can get Kornnheiser the hell off MNF.

And in sadder news, Rome is done. Decent ending and the last episodes were pretty good.  I'll miss it.  My HBO subscription is on its last legs.  It's probably to the point now that just buying full season DVDs is magnitudes cheaper than subscribing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 26, 2007, 11:33:36 AM
Jaws over Theismann is a damn good thing, but fuck do they need to euthanize Kornhole. He's just death to the broadcast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on March 26, 2007, 11:35:55 AM
There is a god! (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/03/26/bc.fbn.mondaynightfootb.ap/index.html) Now, if only someone can get Kornnheiser the hell off MNF.

And in sadder news, Rome is done. Decent ending and the last episodes were pretty good.  I'll miss it.  My HBO subscription is on its last legs.  It's probably to the point now that just buying full season DVDs is magnitudes cheaper than subscribing.


Thank GOD someone finally listened and shitcanned Theismann. Have the last 4 Romes on DVR, and am working my way through the first season on DVD. At least Entourage is starting back up soon! (Sue me- it is a guilty pleasure, and Piven fucking ROCKS).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 26, 2007, 11:41:17 AM
Jaws over Theismann is a damn good thing, but fuck do they need to euthanize Kornhole. He's just death to the broadcast.

Jaws is a great move as he's always been the smartest football announcer I've known. I've never had the same malice towards Kornheiser that yall do, but I do think he should have one more season to shake off the image he had last year. He would be a great announcer if he'd take the handcuffs off a little about the players themselves rather than just trying to analyze the game. He's much funnier when he does that on PTI.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 26, 2007, 11:43:55 AM
No, Kornhole is just a loudmouth douchebag who has no business being in a booth. He doesn't add anything to the discussion besides vitriolic attitude. It would be like putting me in the booth if every player was Terrell Owens. Nothing good would come off it, other than venomous ranting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 26, 2007, 11:51:25 AM
He doesn't add anything to the discussion besides vitriolic attitude.

The comedic irony here is gold, you do realize?  :-P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 26, 2007, 12:12:07 PM
Which is why I put this bit in my statement.

It would be like putting me in the booth if every player was Terrell Owens. Nothing good would come off it, other than venomous ranting.

But I'd at least like to think my vitriol has base.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 26, 2007, 12:33:34 PM
Most of the time, yes. Although, I'd love to see Kornheiser call Theisman a cockmuffin just for the inevitable fallout.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 26, 2007, 01:27:58 PM
That would be glorious.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on March 27, 2007, 01:05:47 PM
Was sad to see Rome end.  I was at least hoping they would keep a window open for a possible future special or something.  Agreed on the HBO subscription losing its luster.  So many good shows are gone or going; soon Curb Your Enthusiasm will be all I have left.

Ditto on Kornheiser needing to be shot like a dog.  It was bad enough that he took over the Washington Post sports page but MNF is too fucking far.  He knows jack shit about football and tells jokes only 55+ year old white guys think are funny (nonstop no less).  Clearly he's the answer to MNF's ratings problems.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 27, 2007, 01:26:11 PM
I'm hoping that the final episodes of The Sopranos are as good as the first three seasons were since they can start killing everyone off as they please.  It will probably wind up sucking as bad as seasons 4, 5 and 6 though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on March 27, 2007, 01:44:49 PM
My DVR snatched the new Penn & Teller episode. Woohoo! Kinda weakish (obesity, don't remember much of the content but it didn't make us argue, so it had to have been weak :P), but I hope the new season delivers like in the past.

If you guys get a chance to see Flip This House with the Montelongo's, I recommend it. Scary if you're in the market; also funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on March 27, 2007, 04:03:27 PM
Was sad to see Rome end.  I was at least hoping they would keep a window open for a possible future special or something.

I was hoping they'd extend the Antony and Cleopatra story into a 3rd season. Then it just skipped like 3 or 4 years around episode 18 (telling from how much Verenus' son/stepson/grandson grew up).

Oh well. Rome was originally intended as a miniseries anyways. We're lucky we even got two seasons worth.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 28, 2007, 05:24:30 AM
Ya, just finished Rome, good stuff.  Ditto re: the time jumps, I do like the way they used the younger children to show us how much time had passed.

Although, I do have to say wtf to Marc fucking Anthony doing a whole:

"What do ya mean, funny? Let me understand this cause, I don't know maybe it's me, I'm a little fucked up maybe, but I'm funny how? I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh... I'm here to fuckin' amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how? How am I funny?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 28, 2007, 09:48:56 PM
Great episode of Lost tonight. Now that things are back on the main island the show is really picking back up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 28, 2007, 10:03:07 PM
Great episode of Lost tonight. Now that things are back on the main island the show is really picking back up.

Interesting. I sort of thought of it as a copout "clip-show" type of thing for them to waste time. I was sitting there at the beginning going, "Oh good, we're going to focus an entire show around characters I couldn't give a shit about." The fact they went all Cask of Amontillado with it was just a twist to cover up the fact they didn't say anything the whole time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on March 28, 2007, 10:33:45 PM
Yeah, it was a filler episode.  At first I didn't like it at all, retconning a bunch of stuff to make them seem important.  But then it started to feel almost like an inside joke.

And the ending was perfect.  I've been wanting them to die since they appeared.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 28, 2007, 10:54:27 PM
Quote
copout "clip-show"

I didn't think that at all. I'm a sucker for self-referential stuff so I thought it was very clever how they worked them into the prior story-lines/scenes, particularly when everyone's reaction to them (likely planned) was "who the fuck are these people and where did they come from," cleverly voiced in the ep. by Sawyer. Seeing parts of the crash was cool and there were payoffs like why Paolo was in the bathroom at the Pearl and that Ben used it to spy on Jack/create the plan. It wasn't a "clip show" so much because it was from a different perspective. Very Rashomon. The ending was nice and creepy as an added bonus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 29, 2007, 09:11:03 AM
I didn't much like last night's Lost episode. It did feel very much a filler episode, dispensing with characters I never really liked. The fact that every 3rd person on that plane was some kind of con man or crook is getting a bit hard to take. What I really didn't like was the two of them finding a hatch and just opening it like it was nothing. Didn't Locke find the first hatch near the airplane and have to get dynamite to blow the thing open? That part didn't fit to me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 29, 2007, 09:51:13 AM
Explains a few little details like were the Other's poison darts come from.
I think that walkie-talkie is going to be important.

I hope they bring back Bernard and Rose.  The island seems to like Rose in the same way it likes John.  She could still play an important role and he undoubtly would be her knight.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 29, 2007, 10:32:07 AM
I'm with Abo.  I liked it as an episode, filler or not, just because it got back into the 'fucked-up stuff' vibe of the first season.   The ending was perfect, and I just laughed like a madman at how dark and twisted it was.   I almost empathized and felt bad for them, until I rememberd how they offed the geezer.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 29, 2007, 04:08:55 PM
Ok it wasn't a clip show, but it felt like that to me. The whole "let's look at things from a different perspective" is bullshit in this kind of show because it's an island. Honestly, if they keep throwing more crappy character backstories at us, they could go on forever. I just don't care about EVERY member on that plane. This isn't Oliver Twist, the character list is long enough.

Also, I'm with Haemish, it's becoming harder to accept that 75% of the people on the damn plane has a criminal past or connection.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 29, 2007, 04:51:07 PM
>Also, I'm with Haemish, it's becoming harder to accept that 75% of the people on the damn plane has a criminal past or connection.
But people being magically cured when they come to the island is not hard to accept?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 29, 2007, 09:40:26 PM
>Also, I'm with Haemish, it's becoming harder to accept that 75% of the people on the damn plane has a criminal past or connection.
But people being magically cured when they come to the island is not hard to accept?

No, that's crap as well, but it's two characters. I can suspend a little disbelief over two people when it's written well. Making the entire plane into a randomly assigned Con-Air? There are just better vehicles for that kind of assumption. It's piss-poor characterization.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 30, 2007, 07:49:12 AM
>Also, I'm with Haemish, it's becoming harder to accept that 75% of the people on the damn plane has a criminal past or connection.
But people being magically cured when they come to the island is not hard to accept?

That part I don't have a problem with, it's part of the suspension of disbelief that I normally achieve on a sci-fi/adventure show. But really, there's just so many goddamn crooked fuckers all on this same flight from Australia. Making them really tangenital characters for a season and a half before focusing a whole episode on them in which you kill them? It just screams "We have HOW MANY more episodes to write for this season? SHIT SHIT SHIT!"

I still love the show, and I thought it was a good episode by itself. I just think in the whole fabric of the show it was a bit wasted.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 30, 2007, 09:07:50 AM
>Also, I'm with Haemish, it's becoming harder to accept that 75% of the people on the damn plane has a criminal past or connection.
But people being magically cured when they come to the island is not hard to accept?

No, that's crap as well, but it's two characters. I can suspend a little disbelief over two people when it's written well. Making the entire plane into a randomly assigned Con-Air? There are just better vehicles for that kind of assumption. It's piss-poor characterization.

It's not 75% of the people, though.  The flight carried 361 people, there were 71 survivors (49 in the front, 22 in the tail.)   That's 20%.  Then the Others took the "Good" people, leaving only the fucked-up and the criminals who are our "heroes."  Therefore, some bit less than 20% of the flight are criminals...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on March 30, 2007, 09:36:14 AM
The most infuriating part of Lost is how none of the crash survivors bother to ask any of the Others how they know so much about people they've never met before.  I could understand why they wouldn't have told Sawyer or Kate (had they bothered to ask), since they were never in a position to force any answers.  But Jack sure was.  So was Locke.  All the time Ben was smugly telling Locke all the things he knew about Locke's background while Locke had a gun on him, did Locke ever ask "How do you know all that?"  Of course not.

In completely unrelated news, The Shield is back this Tuesday.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 30, 2007, 10:04:44 AM
To follow up Merusk's point, the list of flat out criminals I come up with is:

Sawyer
Kate
Jin
Eko
Paolo/hot chick

The last two are just throw away McGuffins, so you really only have 4. I didn't count Sayid becuase he was a soldier or Charlie becuase he was just a junkie. Who am I missing?

Plus, the whole point is that these are fucked up people. All four of the above had some extenuating circumstances about how they got into crime in the first place. Criminals are also some of the better dramatic devices for a multitude of reasons, so I just don't see that as a reason for bagging on the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 30, 2007, 04:36:27 PM
I'm pretty sure Shannon was running a con on her family for fraud, and I thought Anna-Lucia was a dirty cop. I'm not sure on those two, but they were slimy at the very least.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 30, 2007, 04:45:33 PM
Worst of all Claire was a goth.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 31, 2007, 05:36:29 PM
Anna-Lucia was a dirty cop, having murdered a suspect in cold blood.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 31, 2007, 06:30:38 PM
More of a vigilante than cold blood if you ask me. All of their crimes are somewhat morally ambiguous which is what is interesting. The only one's that weren't were the people that were just buried alive.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 31, 2007, 10:57:11 PM
More of a vigilante than cold blood if you ask me. All of their crimes are somewhat morally ambiguous which is what is interesting. The only one's that weren't were the people that were just buried alive.

Uh, Sawyer murdered a guy in cold blood. The wrong guy at that. That's not really ambiguous.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on March 31, 2007, 11:11:28 PM
Still, killing the guy that was responsible for the death of your parents wouldn't be as bad as killing for money. It was an honest mistake in a way.

At least he will get a second chance. If they keep up that everybody is connected spiel, there will be an ominous look on Lockes dad face when somebody mentiones the name Sawyer for the first time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 31, 2007, 11:24:09 PM
More of a vigilante than cold blood if you ask me. All of their crimes are somewhat morally ambiguous which is what is interesting. The only one's that weren't were the people that were just buried alive.

Uh, Sawyer murdered a guy in cold blood. The wrong guy at that. That's not really ambiguous.

As has been pointed out, it wasn't exactly "in cold blood." It was misguided vengence and he was a patsy manipulated into doing it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 01, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
I got a chance to watch a shitload of a backwards marathon of Perfect Hair Forever tonight on Adult Swim.

Only one word in the english language can describe this show...

Art.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 01, 2007, 09:24:42 AM
It was pretty damn amusing, I'll give it that.  Didn't know it was going backwards, as I came in at about 11:45.  Huh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on April 04, 2007, 10:14:33 AM
Anyone else watching The Riches?  So far it hasn't been a bad way to spend an hour.  Eddie Izzard and Minnie Driver are both a lot of fun to watch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 04, 2007, 12:29:49 PM
Just when I thought Lovecraft-inspired (and oh so loosely) movies couldn't get any worse, I saw The Halfway House (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0390073/) last night. Part D-grade horror movie, part softcore porn, all cheese. Amazing in it's badness. Best feature: Sgt. Dick Sheen (and of course the obligatory shower scene). I stuck with it all the way to the credits and was rewarded with one of the worst theme songs imaginable, like some drunken retard wanting to be Tool and Korn with a home recording kit and a bottle of moonshine.

I'm surprised it wasn't enough to call up Cthulhu.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on April 09, 2007, 07:41:52 PM
Great episode of 24 tonight.  Dormitory consensus is it was the best in the last couple months.  And the secondary plot just got rolling. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on April 09, 2007, 07:45:43 PM
I like the characters in The Riches, but watching Izzard squirm when he's asked anything about the law is painful.  I'm somewhat surprised that noone's made a fuss over his little kid being a cross-dresser.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on April 10, 2007, 06:53:47 AM
The Sopranos suck.  That episode sucked just as bad as the last two seasons sucked.  Sucked.

And they destroyed Tony's character.  We always knew he was a bad guy but he never did anything so bad that he was plainly evil.  Now that he ordered some innocent father killed for a little money and to get revenge on Bobby he's just out and out evil and can't garner any sympathy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 10, 2007, 09:38:41 AM
Great episode of 24 tonight.  Dormitory consensus is it was the best in the last couple months.  And the secondary plot just got rolling. 


(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y222/Abagadro/jump_the_shark.gif)



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 10, 2007, 09:44:23 AM
I like the characters in The Riches, but watching Izzard squirm when he's asked anything about the law is painful.  I'm somewhat surprised that noone's made a fuss over his little kid being a cross-dresser.

I keep trying to figure out if that's a nod toward's Izzard's own proclivities or something that was in there before they did the casting.

  As for nobody making a fuss, it's pretty subtle things, like ribbons in the hair or girls shoes, and it's on a show that isn't getting a lot of national attention (from what I've noticed at least).   Were it to become one of the top 10 you'd hear about it all over.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 10, 2007, 10:00:04 AM
The real question is whether the kid is an executive transvestite.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 10, 2007, 04:30:22 PM
Of course not, he's a Gypsy (sorry, Romani..).  Executive transvestites are for buffers!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on April 10, 2007, 08:09:39 PM
The Sopranos opening was low key.  I made the mistake of skimming a review, and that shot most of the surprises.  Not alot going on here, after a 15 month? wait.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on April 11, 2007, 08:19:08 AM
I liked the Sopranos opener.  With all the focus on family and Carmella getting hurt in the Tony-Bobby fight I presume they are setting up the fact that Tony, who convinces himself that he does everything for his family, will lose them because of his job (and his job because he's trying to stay in his family's good graces). 

I think something very bad will happen to Carmella (she gets killed/finds out about Adriana/gets arrested to get to Tony) and that will finally destroy him.  And both Tony and Phil are softies on their way out of power.

The tragedy is that we all know that he jumps at Obi-Wan kills people for money and gets his limbs chopped off gets killed/jailed out of pride rather than love for his family.

I could be totally wrong.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 11, 2007, 08:38:14 AM
I had it (Sopranos) on the DVR, but I decided to erase it to make more room for the Planet Earth series on DiscoveryHD. Holy shit that is a great show and you should all be watching it. Amazing cinematography.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on April 11, 2007, 08:41:13 AM
I'm watching and recording all of them. It's awesome.

Extreme engineering is pretty freaking cool too.. I wish they'd rerun some of the other HD shows, they seem to be shown once and vanish without a trace.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on April 11, 2007, 09:02:29 AM
Planet Earth is brilliantly shot and all but when I watched that baby elephant get seperated from its mother in a sandstorm and eventually pick up her scent only to follow it in the wrong direction as the camera slowly pans out to this baby elephant slowly marching to a lonely death from starvation in a vast, empty desert I had to turn it off and haven't been able to watch it again since.  :cry:

I did see this fucking awesome HD documentary about one particular beaver dam that I would suggest to anybody if I could remember the title.  It might just be "beavers."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 11, 2007, 09:10:05 AM
I tried to find that film but I ended up with a much different type of documentary.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on April 11, 2007, 09:12:55 AM
That was pretty depressing... as was the polar bear who attacks the walrus herd and gets gored, just sort of gives up and lies down... it really strikes home how brutal and unforgiving the animal kingdom is... It's amazing how close animals come to starving every single month/year of their lives and how much of a struggle it really is.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on April 11, 2007, 09:18:38 AM
I tried to find that film but I ended up with a much different type of documentary.

I also saw this fantastic documentary on the sociology of womens' prisons.  You should look for that one, too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on April 11, 2007, 09:20:14 AM
That was the most bored I have ever been watching an episode of the Sopranos. The biggest problem for me would be that Janice and his wife are probably my least favorite characters of the show's entire run, and they decided to have them in every fucking scene of that episode. That was the first time I ever actually started fast forwarding while watching a non-repeat show that didn't have commercials.

Oh, and my guess is that in some convoluted manner, Tony ends up killing Carmella himself at the end.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 11, 2007, 09:38:55 AM
Ya, I've been watching a lot of Discovery HD Theater recently.  That show is fantastic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on April 11, 2007, 10:21:56 AM
I did see this fucking awesome HD documentary about one particular beaver dam that I would suggest to anybody if I could remember the title.  It might just be "beavers."

Beavers 16 was much better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 11, 2007, 11:35:13 AM
I did see this fucking awesome HD documentary about one particular beaver dam that I would suggest to anybody if I could remember the title.  It might just be "beavers."
That was an awesome show, I remember it. The one where a bear attacks the lodge at one point?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on April 11, 2007, 12:38:17 PM
I did see this fucking awesome HD documentary about one particular beaver dam that I would suggest to anybody if I could remember the title.  It might just be "beavers."
That was an awesome show, I remember it. The one where a bear attacks the lodge at one point?

Yes.  They are pretty incredible little critters.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on April 12, 2007, 03:21:08 PM
Lost: Juliet is still in cohorts with Ben after everything that has happened?  Hard to believe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on April 12, 2007, 03:24:51 PM
I did see this fucking awesome HD documentary about one particular beaver dam that I would suggest to anybody if I could remember the title.  It might just be "beavers."
That was an awesome show, I remember it. The one where a bear attacks the lodge at one point?

Yes.  They are pretty incredible little critters.

Best dam movie I ever saw....


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 13, 2007, 07:34:02 AM
Have we mentioned Bullshit is airing new episodes? That took forever imo (and one was on BOOBIES).

Where the hell is Lucky Louie? Don't Chappelle me, CK.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 13, 2007, 10:33:42 AM
Have we mentioned Bullshit is airing new episodes? That took forever imo (and one was on BOOBIES).

Where the hell is Lucky Louie? Don't Chappelle me, CK.

WTF can't Bullshit be on HBO? It is not reason enough on its own to subscribe to Showtime.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 13, 2007, 02:23:10 PM
In honor of The Office returning in style, I present this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm3xlJ0yQOE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efanpop%2Ecom%2Fspots%2Fthe%2Doffice%2D%252528us%252529%2Fvideos%2F20410). This is the kind of thing for which YouTube was made. Awesome!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 13, 2007, 03:16:28 PM
In honor of The Office returning in style, I present this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm3xlJ0yQOE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efanpop%2Ecom%2Fspots%2Fthe%2Doffice%2D%252528us%252529%2Fvideos%2F20410). This is the kind of thing for which YouTube was made. Awesome!

That was really well done.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on April 13, 2007, 06:53:10 PM
In honor of The Office returning in style, I present this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm3xlJ0yQOE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efanpop%2Ecom%2Fspots%2Fthe%2Doffice%2D%252528us%252529%2Fvideos%2F20410). This is the kind of thing for which YouTube was made. Awesome!

Haha, wicked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on April 13, 2007, 07:30:06 PM
Have we mentioned Bullshit is airing new episodes? That took forever imo (and one was on BOOBIES).

Where the hell is Lucky Louie? Don't Chappelle me, CK.

WTF can't Bullshit be on HBO? It is not reason enough on its own to subscribe to Showtime.

2nd season of Dexter should be coming up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 13, 2007, 07:42:23 PM
That new Jeff Goldblum show, Raines, is pretty damn good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on April 13, 2007, 10:09:06 PM
That new Jeff Goldblum show, Raines, is pretty damn good.
I wouldn't say damn good, but it has promise. However given that it's on Friday nights I'm not sure it's going to survive past its inaugural season. I do like the fact that he's not actually seeing and talking to "ghosts". The original promos for the show made it seem like it was detective show meets Sixth Sense/Ghost Whisperer/Tru Calling/Medium/et al but that's not actually what's going on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mandrel on April 13, 2007, 10:36:01 PM
That new Jeff Goldblum show, Raines, is pretty damn good.
I wouldn't say damn good, but it has promise. However given that it's on Friday nights I'm not sure it's going to survive past its inaugural season. I do like the fact that he's not actually seeing and talking to "ghosts". The original promos for the show made it seem like it was detective show meets Sixth Sense/Ghost Whisperer/Tru Calling/Medium/et al but that's not actually what's going on.


Nope, he's just the "crazy detective", that's his "thing".

I've liked the couple of episodes I've seen.  I was disappointed by the Friday night switch though.  How many nights are actually viable for new shows once Dancing with the Stars, American Idol and Deal or No Deal are on?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on April 15, 2007, 08:16:40 PM
"You may have checked out with my superior officer, but you haven't checked out with me."

Painkiller Jane was beyond aweful.  Drive was pretty good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 15, 2007, 08:52:00 PM
What can I say, I'm a big Jeff Goldblum fan.

Really, if they made a show with Jeff Goldblum and Tim Curry where Jeff was a scientist and Tim was a sociopath, it might just be the last thing I ever watch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on April 15, 2007, 09:27:38 PM
I can see them doing this... Only they would be a gay couple and Rutger Hauer would be their therapist...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 16, 2007, 04:49:02 AM
I wish I didn't like Drive as much as I did.  It's like a scripted, high-def, Amazing Race.  Also, Nathan Fillion delivers crafty one-liners.

Interesting to see how they stretch it out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on April 16, 2007, 05:28:01 AM
2nd'd on the Painkiller Jane awfulness. Also wasn't really impressed with the Stargate season premiers.

I liked Drive, but don't see how they will be able to keep it up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on April 16, 2007, 06:47:29 AM
"You may have checked out with my superior officer, but you haven't checked out with me."

Painkiller Jane was beyond aweful.  Drive was pretty good.


I can't even express how bad Painkiller Jane was.  It's like it was written by retarded monkeys.  On the other hand Drive, while completely ridiculous, was a lot of fun.  I'm a huge fan of Nathan Fillion anyway, so that didn't hurt.  Drive is like a silly but fun popcorn movie on TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 16, 2007, 02:46:04 PM
I can see them doing this... Only they would be a gay couple and Rutger Hauer would be their therapist...

It needs Bruce Campbell in there somewhere to be complete. Maybe he's their smarmy neighbor.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on April 16, 2007, 03:14:15 PM
Alf could be his roommate!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on April 16, 2007, 05:59:51 PM
I can see them doing this... Only they would be a gay couple and Rutger Hauer would be their therapist...

It needs Bruce Campbell in there somewhere to be complete. Maybe he's their smarmy neighbor.

I would watch this.  It would have to be fucking insano Rutger Hauer, though.  "Wake up!  It's time to die!" 

Definitely needs Powers Boothe being despicable and smarmy too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on April 16, 2007, 06:14:21 PM
By the way:

Opinions on the latest Sopranos episode?

I liked it.  A return to mob drama,  while cooking up some nice interpersonal dysfunction.  An important death,  and it seems we'll have fun politics out of New York.

It's too bad Meadow is going to be a doctor.  I was nursing a secret hope that she would end up in law school,  have a change of morals, and wind up taking over her father's empire.


If you can't tell,  tax season is over tomorrow so I have time and energy to post and what not.  Just have to tell someone they owe $280,000 to Uncle Sam and I'm home free!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 18, 2007, 03:26:09 AM
Oh, forgot to mention.

The Tudors is good too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 18, 2007, 07:35:48 AM
We've got the Tudors loaded up on the DVR but haven't gotten to them yet (and we need to, the HD episodes are big).

Has anyone been watching the great America at a Crossroads that's been on PBS via Frontline? Two nights ago they had a bunch of soldier-created content and last night they looked into the sects as gangs. Last night's in particular was amazing, just incredible footage. One 'highlight' was our guys working with the iraqi police to find a weapons stash, while the IP were talking on camera about how it was a tiny stash and the real stash was with some mullah one of the guys followed. Nobody there spoke iraqish, so it wasn't translated until the editing stage.

Must-see tv, up there with Spike Lee's joint on New Orleans. The stuff the mainstream media /should/ be focusing on.

Also, SG-1 and Atlantis are airing again on Sci-Fi.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 18, 2007, 09:44:33 AM
Let me just say, Natalie Dormer = Super Hot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on April 18, 2007, 10:45:48 AM
The Sopranos is ok.  I didn't really enjoy last season, and think this season so far is much better.  The show is done though, should have been over by now.  I love the actors but the scripts just aren't grabbing me much.  What else is there to do but end it?

The Riches has me hooked. 

We got an HD TV for ourselves for Christmas, but only get about 6 HD channels.  Living Planet on Discovery is awesome.

The Shield is the best show on TV.

About to give up on Lost, it's just pissing me off way too much.

Missed too many Heroes.  Now I'm going to rent it on DVD so I can catch it next season (assuming there is one).

Want to see the Tudors but don't get Showtime.  Another DVD to rent.

Rome enthralled me.  What an excellent series that was.

House is becoming repetitive.  Would like to see Hugh Laurie on an FX show.

24 is my favorite show to hoot at.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on April 18, 2007, 11:04:17 AM
By the way:

Opinions on the latest Sopranos episode?

I liked it.  A return to mob drama,  while cooking up some nice interpersonal dysfunction.  An important death,  and it seems we'll have fun politics out of New York.

Liked it.  I like the mob stuff and Tony actually having a worthwhile session with Melfi (and being less of a douchebag) a lot more than the boring family stuff.  Phil is going to start hurting people I think.  I also am a little displeased at the de-emphazising of Meadow.

Watched the first episode of The Tudors.  Didn't like it.  Boring.  (Maybe I've read/watched too much Shakespeare)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on April 18, 2007, 11:11:51 AM
By the way:

Opinions on the latest Sopranos episode?

I liked it.  A return to mob drama,  while cooking up some nice interpersonal dysfunction.  An important death,  and it seems we'll have fun politics out of New York.

Liked it.  I like the mob stuff and Tony actually having a worthwhile session with Melfi (and being less of a douchebag) a lot more than the boring family stuff.  Phil is going to start hurting people I think.  I also am a little displeased at the de-emphazising of Meadow.

Watched the first episode of The Tudors.  Didn't like it.  Boring.  (Maybe I've read/watched too much Shakespeare)

New York is going to be a nightmare.  And I bet Tony is going to play that situation to its fullest. 

Spoilers:

Good send off to Johny Sacs.  Little Carmine entertains me,  they way he can switch back and forth between being almost wise and a complete idiot.  Phil is sort of one note,  and he really comes into his own only when he goes on the warpath.

I like the way Christopher's character has grown.  Tony and Carmelia fall back on old behavior soooo often, like the first episode, with Tony getting sly backhanded revenge on Bobby or Carmelia externalizing her own emotional conflicts on to other people.

Meadow is always a character that comes in,  seems to be right in it, and disappears again with her plot threads seemingly discarded.  AJ is just there for idiot value, I think....

Need more Paulie!

Anyone know what lake they were supposed to be at in the Adirondacks?  If it's that close to Montreal,  that's right in my neck of the woods.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 18, 2007, 11:37:46 AM
When does Entourage start up again?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 18, 2007, 11:41:36 AM
I didn't really think The Tudors was all that awesome.  Needs... something.  I've seen worse, no doubt.  Wife likes it, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on April 18, 2007, 11:43:15 AM
When does Entourage start up again?

Already has.  Synched up with the Sopranos.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on April 18, 2007, 11:49:43 AM
I've been watching Dresden Files.  I like it.  I don't know why.  I think the season is over, though.  Maybe.  I hope Dexter comes back.  I miss him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 18, 2007, 12:09:17 PM
I've been watching Dresden Files.  I like it.  I don't know why.  I think the season is over, though.  Maybe.  I hope Dexter comes back.  I miss him.

I want Dexter back too.  But I don't want them to bring it back and fuck up the goodness w/ the original season by stretching the story.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 18, 2007, 12:21:20 PM
Tudors picks up in episode 3.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 18, 2007, 12:22:08 PM
Tudors picks up in episode 3.

To the TiVo!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 18, 2007, 12:31:12 PM
Tudors picks up in episode 3.
To the TiVo!

Natalie Dormer starts getting naked in episode 3.

Also, some neat political shit starts happening.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 18, 2007, 12:33:30 PM
Oh, naked, well that does have its place but I found a fascinating piece of cinema on the internet last night that should have plenty of replay value.  I was hoping you would say that Sam Neil was joined by other actual actors.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 18, 2007, 12:38:37 PM
The brit from Dead Like Me is getting more lines...

Yea, that's about it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on April 18, 2007, 03:11:53 PM
Hey is that the same guy that plays Holt in Dirt?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 18, 2007, 04:06:10 PM
Nope. Holt is played by Josh Stewart, while Mason (Dead Like Me) was played by Callum Blue.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 20, 2007, 07:39:53 AM
My Name is Earl. I love Norm MacDonald. I love Norm doing his Burt Reynolds.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 22, 2007, 02:58:59 AM
Christ. Painkiller Jane is some dogshit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: eldaec on April 22, 2007, 03:14:47 AM
I am informed that you American types are getting the second series of Life on Mars starting April 30 assuming you have BBC America.

You should watch that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 22, 2007, 03:15:49 AM
Is there going to be another season of Primeval?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: eldaec on April 22, 2007, 03:29:13 AM
Apparently yes.

It's ITV so I didn't watch the first one. Typically it's safe to assume that everything on ITV is shit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 22, 2007, 03:53:56 AM
I can stand very little british television because of the pisspoor broadcast qualty (even on big name things, MI-6, Life on mars, etc), but I was able to stand primeval. Probably because of the absolutely ridiculous premise.

Why does Britain broadcast everything through a time machine back to the 70s and then back to us? It really fucks up the video quality.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on April 22, 2007, 04:02:51 AM
I can stand very little british television because of the pisspoor broadcast qualty (even on big name things, MI-6, Life on mars, etc), but I was able to stand primeval. Probably because of the absolutely ridiculous premise.


Yet more evidence, were it needed, that you're completely insane.  And have no taste.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 22, 2007, 04:33:46 AM
I hear what Schild's trying to say. Some British shows (really, just Euro shows in general) look like they're using old equipment and sets . While I loved it, I first thought Ab Fab was just reruns of a British show from the 80's. It had the set and film quality of a show like All in the Family. If it wasn't for the references, clothes, and styling, I wouldn't have known it was contemporary.

Red Dwarf had the quality of a MST3K skit (the stuff they did in-between making fun of bad movies). Really amateur-ish.

There's this BBC Robin Hood TV series on right now -- I kind of like it, but something like that would probably get the feature film treatment in the States.

[edit] Spelling


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on April 22, 2007, 04:38:38 AM
Robin Hood deserves the cast, crew and writers to be bundled into a mini and the mini set on fire.

Then release the wolves.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 22, 2007, 04:43:05 AM
I've only seen about four episodes. I don't mind it so far.

Then again, I only turn it on when there's nothing else on (BBC On Demand). ;)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 22, 2007, 09:03:29 AM
I can stand very little british television because of the pisspoor broadcast qualty (even on big name things, MI-6, Life on mars, etc), but I was able to stand primeval. Probably because of the absolutely ridiculous premise.
Yet more evidence, were it needed, that you're completely insane.  And have no taste.
Seriously, the shows look like they were made by equipment that would be used in a 70s porn. You can claim otherwise, and claim I have no taste, but it doesn't prove anything other than you have bad eyes.

The worst part, is that the quality is that bad ON DVD.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 22, 2007, 09:26:32 AM
OTOH, I think that most broadcasts on the Sci-Fi channel look pretty bad too. Many of which are American.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 22, 2007, 09:38:18 AM
OTOH, I think that most broadcasts on the Sci-Fi channel look pretty bad too. Many of which are American.

Oh they look like dogshit. But our news channels at least don't look like a college/high school public access LEARN SPANISH channel.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: eldaec on April 22, 2007, 01:20:26 PM
Why does Britain broadcast everything through a time machine back to the 70s and then back to us? It really fucks up the video quality.

It's actually the reverse, the British production companies use as little image manipulation as possible, and end up with images that, when compared to reality, look far more 'accurate'. The British public wails and moans whenever a popular British show is put out with US style image filtering.

The problem is that this makes special effects look far more obvious, and makes it harder for editors to add atmosphere in post production. Everything looks like it is set in a TV studio.

The second problem is that you can never convince a British producer to shell out for extras. That was never more obvious than on Spooks/MI6 which appeared to present a world where SIS had at most eight employees.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 22, 2007, 01:35:19 PM
Is Primeval that show with the lesbian ghost?  That was pretty crappy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 22, 2007, 01:48:54 PM
Heh. No. Primeval is about a rift in the space time continuum that let's monsters through.

Quote
It's actually the reverse, the British production companies use as little image manipulation as possible, and end up with images that, when compared to reality, look far more 'accurate'. The British public wails and moans whenever a popular British show is put out with US style image filtering.

The problem is that this makes special effects look far more obvious, and makes it harder for editors to add atmosphere in post production. Everything looks like it is set in a TV studio.

The second problem is that you can never convince a British producer to shell out for extras. That was never more obvious than on Spooks/MI6 which appeared to present a world where SIS had at most eight employees.

Yea, MI6 is the show that really set me off. Before I coped with it because I mostly watched comedy and after SCTV, you can watch anything. But the moment suspense/action stuff came up, oh man, trash. Someone should really tell the BBC that everything they make looks like dogshit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 23, 2007, 06:47:04 AM
Now, if they were actually coming from the moon, that would be super-duper.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on April 23, 2007, 06:59:08 AM
Is anyone watching Jericho? I just started watching it next week and it's very... fallouty. Especially the last episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 23, 2007, 07:00:40 AM
I have seen a few episodes where Major Dad goes with some people to a lawless town to get parts.  Trouble is, everything on CBS makes me feel like I am watching Diagnosis: Murder.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on April 23, 2007, 07:22:36 AM
It's a weird show. On one hand, it's sci-fi with broad story arcs that we know and love.  On the other, it's folksy oatmeal-style dialogue and cinematography can be tiresome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 23, 2007, 07:34:27 AM
Ah yes, that's what I was trying to think of: it's very CBS... that is to say it's very Wilford Brimley and/or Angela Lansbury.  I feel like I need to have a Reader's Digest and some Aspercreme nearby while I watch it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on April 23, 2007, 07:54:13 AM
Yeah, well, it's the only post-appocalyptic anti-utopia show right now. Or am I wrong? And I fucking LOVE this setting... I guess I played fallout at a very impressionable age.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on April 23, 2007, 08:01:47 AM
Watching The Lost Room again.

So good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on April 23, 2007, 11:41:24 AM
Watching The Lost Room again.

So good.

One thing you can say for scifi despite all the shit they ladle out is when they get something right, they get it right.  Great miniseries.  Would be interesting as a full television series,  but I don't see how they could go anywhere but down from the mini.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: kaid on April 23, 2007, 02:28:45 PM
Hehe scifi isn't afraid to trot out a whole bunch of dogs in hope one of them is actually a diamond. They get it wrong a lot but then when they get it right it can be quite good. I am oddly entertained by eureka and am glad that got a second season. Still I like bad zombie films so take anything I say with a brain eating grain of salt.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on April 23, 2007, 02:38:19 PM
I loved LR, but knew it wouldn't get picked up.  It focused more on the sci-fi elements than the characters.  That was more "hardcore" sci-fi than what most people like.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Big Gulp on April 23, 2007, 05:02:53 PM
Okay, I've been sitting on season 2 of Battlestar Galactica for like, 6 months now, and I've decided to finally watch it.  Good so far, but I absolutely cannot stand Starbuck.  Shitty character, shitty actress, all in all just pure shit.  Anyone else having this reaction, or is it just me?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on April 23, 2007, 08:44:38 PM
Okay, I've been sitting on season 2 of Battlestar Galactica for like, 6 months now, and I've decided to finally watch it.  Good so far, but I absolutely cannot stand Starbuck.  Shitty character, shitty actress, all in all just pure shit.  Anyone else having this reaction, or is it just me?

Not a big Starbuck fan,  though I missed almost all of season 2.  It's some consolation that shitty things keep happening to her, though.

I watch for Tigh, Adama, and the Pres.  Fun, fun characters.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: eldaec on April 24, 2007, 06:02:54 AM
Starbuck was ok when she had less angst and some kind of functional relationship with other people. Season 1 she was fine. Season 2 she is ok some of the time. Season 3 she's as annoying as everyone else and in season 3 that's pretty damn annoying.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 24, 2007, 06:19:55 AM
If annoying means real, then sure. I think the whole love quadrangle thing is a good subplot, though the editing in the last UniHD episode (the one with Baltar's interrogation) was too much. They've done a great job of growing the characters, imo. If you think they're acting annoying, well, you try being on the run for years after your entire civilization was destroyed, unsure which day will be your last.

I think there are three or four episodes left in season three on UniHD, some good stuff. I can almost participate in the BSG thread here now ;)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 24, 2007, 06:21:04 AM
I thought she was annoying in the first episode.

There are other reasons why I don't like that show, but she didn't help.

Also, she kind of resembles William Forsythe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 26, 2007, 07:30:36 AM
Drive cancelled after 3 weeks. (http://community.tvguide.com/blog/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/700000049)

Why does Fox hate me so.

Actually, why do the television companies hate Tim Minear?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 26, 2007, 09:23:47 AM
Fuck, I haven't even watched the premiere episode of Drive on the Tivo yet. Fucking Fox.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on April 26, 2007, 09:32:06 AM
That's too bad, it was a fun show.  Silly sure, but fun to watch.  I guess it needed more Dom DeLouise and Jackie Chan.

Edit: Maybe Nathan Fillion screwed some Fox exec's wife or something.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 26, 2007, 09:37:31 AM
Also, she kind of resembles William Forsythe.
I was thinking more Lee Marvin.

 :evil:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on April 26, 2007, 10:03:58 AM
That stinks.  It's not Great Television, but it was entertaining enough.  I could be entertainined watching Nathan Fillion do just about anything, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 26, 2007, 03:54:22 PM
Nathan Fillion is starting to remind me of Ted McGinley. If he shows up in your cast, the show is doomed. Not that he is a bad actor or anything, it is just the way things seem to work.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 26, 2007, 03:58:16 PM
Also, she kind of resembles William Forsythe.
I was thinking more Lee Marvin.

 :evil:

Seriously, I thought she was Forsythe's daughter or sister when I first saw BSG. Looked like him and acted like him.

I have seen her in a more flattering light though. She just comes off that way as Starbuck.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 03, 2007, 05:08:49 AM
So, I'm almost caught up w/ the Shield.

Fucking great season so far.  On episode 5 atm.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on May 03, 2007, 06:03:37 AM
I'll dump this here since its the tv thread. I recently downloaded season one of Arrested Development as I somehow managed to miss the shows entire run. Based on watching the first two episodes, I think I may have missed out on something special.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on May 03, 2007, 08:15:43 AM
I've been enjoying Gumbel 2 Gumbel: Beach Justice.  Who knew so many crimes started on beaches? 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 03, 2007, 08:47:05 AM
For those who stopped watching Lost because it never went anywhere, last night was the place it was going. It's going to be a helluva great end to the season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on May 03, 2007, 08:56:45 AM
For those who stopped watching Lost because it never went anywhere, last night was the place it was going. It's going to be a helluva great end to the season.

Should that turn out to be the case for real, it's exactly what every internet idiot predicted from the beginning of the first season as one of the main reasons for the island. I'm seriously hoping it's not the whole Purgatory thing because I think it's a copout.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 03, 2007, 09:00:19 AM
I still think The Purgatory thing COULD be true, but it could just as easily be a ruse. Ben has shown the capability to pull some strings out in the real world for no reason other than to fuck with people (Juliet being shown her sister and the kid). Why couldn't he have caused Locke's dad's car crash and secret transfer to the island?

The more I think on it, the more I believe it's a red herring.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 03, 2007, 09:18:19 AM
It is, unless they've changed their stance from Season 1 when people started postulating Purgatory and they said, "No, it's not."



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on May 03, 2007, 09:19:04 AM
Did Locke say thanks to Sawyer or did Sawyer say it to Locke?

The pace of Lost is great.  Doesn't feel like they are trying stretch it out like season 1 & 2.

I could have believed Purgatory thing in season 1 but not now.  Magic Island that is powerful enough to hide itself from the modern world is really the only thing that makes sense.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 03, 2007, 09:20:28 AM
I'll dump this here since its the tv thread. I recently downloaded season one of Arrested Development as I somehow managed to miss the shows entire run. Based on watching the first two episodes, I think I may have missed out on something special.

Run, don't walk and get the entire run on DVD. You will love it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 03, 2007, 09:28:41 AM
It is, unless they've changed their stance from Season 1 when people started postulating Purgatory and they said, "No, it's not."



Keep in mind the guys in charge now aren't exactly the same guys. I think Abrams had a bit more pull in season 1, but absolutely none now. I'd take nothing they said as truth.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 03, 2007, 10:09:25 AM
It's not hell and it's not purgatory. Too many people in the outside world interact with it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on May 03, 2007, 10:34:17 AM
It's not hell and it's not purgatory. Too many people in the outside world interact with it.

(http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:_PBtvJXgNZ4yMM:http://mywebpages.comcast)?



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on May 03, 2007, 10:45:14 AM
Anyone still watching the Sopranos?

What the hell was last episode about?  Tony has a gambling problem.  WTF?  Since when has he been gambling?

They pull this shit out of thin air for a show that used to be one of the best, that has a terrific cast, and the storylines have just turned to utter crap the past two seasons (this and last).

Too bad they didn't end it two years ago, or whenever Adriana was taken out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on May 03, 2007, 11:30:44 AM
I'll dump this here since its the tv thread. I recently downloaded season one of Arrested Development as I somehow managed to miss the shows entire run. Based on watching the first two episodes, I think I may have missed out on something special.

Run, don't walk and get the entire run on DVD. You will love it.

I thought they jumped the shark a bit on season 3.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on May 03, 2007, 11:39:07 AM
As I understand it Tony is hellbent on losing on every occasion so that he can remove the good luck debt he got himself into by surviving the gunshot.

It doesn't make any sense otherwise with Tonys obvious disdain for "degenerate gamblers".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 03, 2007, 01:25:41 PM
Tony has gambled throughout the entire series. They were constantly going to underground casinos or Atlantic city. Furio almost pushed him into the rotor blades of a chopper on one trip.  It's only become a problem now because his guys aren't earning as much for him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 03, 2007, 02:14:39 PM
I'll dump this here since its the tv thread. I recently downloaded season one of Arrested Development as I somehow managed to miss the shows entire run. Based on watching the first two episodes, I think I may have missed out on something special.

Run, don't walk and get the entire run on DVD. You will love it.

I thought they jumped the shark a bit on season 3.

I think they knew they weren't getting renewed and so decided to just give the finger to Fox and make the show as strange and inside joke-y as possible.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on May 03, 2007, 02:23:56 PM
How can you go wrong with a retarded Charlize Theron?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on May 03, 2007, 02:35:15 PM
I'd much rather have a non-retarded Charlize Theron.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on May 03, 2007, 02:47:34 PM
Woops! (http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_122080846.html)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on May 03, 2007, 03:11:44 PM
I like that she "Immediately hit record", to save it for her husband.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on May 04, 2007, 09:07:58 AM
I like how she's afraid to watch TV now. People like that make me laugh. And weep.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 04, 2007, 12:45:59 PM
Comcast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 04, 2007, 12:55:37 PM
SciFi all day marathon of John Doe today.

Happy happy Hat.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: FatuousTwat on May 05, 2007, 12:58:21 AM
Oh damnit I missed it. I really liked that show. For some reason, it reminds me of Sentinel (90's tv show) and 7 days... I think Sentinel and John Doe are set in the same city.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 05, 2007, 05:44:16 AM
Gray's Anatomy took a turn for the shitter today. They decided to try to add in the spinoff shit for Madison's show.

That's just not gonna fly. Introducing 9 characters to try and get people to watch a second TV show and then killing off a recurring character in the main portion of the show with no REAL leadup does not a good season finale make.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 05, 2007, 05:56:32 AM
Gray's Anatomy took a turn for the shitter today. They decided to try to add in the spinoff shit for Madison's show.

That's just not gonna fly. Introducing 9 characters to try and get people to watch a second TV show and then killing off a recurring character in the main portion of the show with no REAL leadup does not a good season finale make.
I didn't think it was that bad. I like that they seem to be going for a more humorous bent with Kate Walsh's (Dr. Addison Montgomery) show. Grey's Anatomy, while not as grim and depressing as something like E.R., can still be very "tiring" to watch with all the crap that they constantly throw at the characters.

The no leadup thing was presumably intentional given that the whole thing was supposed to be very sudden. They had lots of other scenes in earlier episodes where Meredith was slowly trying to connect with her other family.

Possible spoiler about Shark's season finale:
Shark's season finale was awesome. Just when you thought James Woods' character might be going a bit soft by being on the "good side" he pulls quite the doozy on his arch-enemy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 05, 2007, 06:17:02 AM
Where the fuck did I come up with Madison. That's how little I care about this woman.

If I wanted to watch a dramedy about the trials and tribulations of a nearly barren doctor, I'd turn on the Oxygen network. Get that crap out of my angsty surgeons in training drama.

Edit: Watching Shark tomorrow. No spoilers please. :P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 05, 2007, 06:57:32 AM
Where the fuck did I come up with Madison. That's how little I care about this woman.
Addison, Madison, that's pretty close.

Quote
Edit: Watching Shark tomorrow. No spoilers please. :P
Oops I probably gave too much away then. Forget I said anything about it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 05, 2007, 06:58:34 AM
Where the fuck did I come up with Madison. That's how little I care about this woman.
Addison, Madison, that's pretty close.

Quote
Edit: Watching Shark tomorrow. No spoilers please. :P
Oops I probably gave too much away then. Forget I said anything about it.

Neg. Still haven't read the sentence. I saw the word Shark and skipped straight to the reply box.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 05, 2007, 07:01:19 AM
Neg. Still haven't read the sentence. I saw the word Shark and skipped straight to the reply box.
Oh okay I changed it to black text just in case.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 05, 2007, 11:47:47 AM
Ah, glad I didn't post the comment I was going to after seeing it, then.  I'll do it Monday sometime, it was a spectacular episode.

Instead, I'll say "Fuck Fucking gimmicks and bullshit to sell outdated media sources." 

Been bugging me ever since I saw the first ad for it, but "Scratch & Sniff" My Name is Earl?  Fucking WHY?  WHY do producers ever think this kind of gimmicky shit is worthwhile?   It doesn't work when you syndicate the show.  It doesn't work when you rerun it later in the season?  Yet every now and then some dumb fuck thinks, "Oh I KNOW! Let's make a 3-d Episode of 'Moonlighting'!  We'll stick the glasses in the TV guides!"   

Sure, that worked in the 80s when everyone HAD a fucking TV guide.. but wtf, it's 2007.  I think the last TV guide I actually bought was in 1997, right before I got cable that shows me the same goddamn thing using the "Guide" button.  (And in fact, is even better because it changes the fucking channel FOR ME. )

Arg. Some shit is so stupid it makes my head pound.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 05, 2007, 07:31:57 PM
Holy shit.

Shark just raised the bar.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on May 05, 2007, 08:32:29 PM
Gray's Anatomy took a turn for the shitter today. They decided to try to add in the spinoff shit for Madison's show.

That's just not gonna fly. Introducing 9 characters to try and get people to watch a second TV show and then killing off a recurring character in the main portion of the show with no REAL leadup does not a good season finale make.

You realize that wasn't the season finale, right?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on May 05, 2007, 08:33:03 PM
Stopped watching Shark several episodes ago when they became formulaic.  Now I wish I'd caught the last one.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 05, 2007, 11:44:44 PM
Stopped watching Shark several episodes ago when they became formulaic.  Now I wish I'd caught the last one.
Yeah the show started off really strong then it muddled around for a while -- the stories with his daughter were especially annoying.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on May 06, 2007, 05:38:07 AM
I quit Shark with all that daughter shit. Are you telling me I should endure that because it gets better again after that?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 06, 2007, 09:37:11 AM
Well, the show has a couple high points. The daughter shit never got to me because I liked the character of Shark. But the ending is totally kickass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on May 06, 2007, 04:52:00 PM
Hmm.... 

New Rescue Me starts in June.  That's really at the top of my list for good TV right now.  Looking forward to that and new Dr. Who.

Sopranos, Rome, BSG, etc. are good,  but not spectacular,  or have their best years behind them.  Hell, my favorite BSG episode is probably "33" which was the first of the series, right?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on May 07, 2007, 04:51:51 PM
Series 3 of Dr. Who has been a bit of a mixed bag so far. First episode is a nice straightforward introduction of the new companion and then off having random adventures. I'd assuming I'm not spoiling too much to say that the Daleks reappear, though how they're handled is interesting. Possibly a very new direction in how they're handled which will be a change from the last two. Still haven't started revealing anything of the metaplot but it looks like Capt. Jack might be making an appearance. Hooray for possibly gay, immortal aliens I guess.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on May 08, 2007, 05:13:56 AM
The next couple of episodes of Who are going to be fantastic.

But I don't want to spoil it for anyone.

The Metaplot really just got going with 'The Lazarus Experiment' and it's only going to build from there.  You really want to catch the final two-parter.


Oh and I don't even like Freema.  I think she's a pain in the arse.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on May 10, 2007, 06:29:45 AM
Holy shit.

Shark just raised the bar.

Thank you for not spoiling it, watched it last night. I still think the first episode of that particular story arc was the best of the season for Shark, this was quite good. Maybe a little over the top in the payoff, but I admit I didn't see it coming.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on May 23, 2007, 08:03:54 PM
So...

What the fuck just happened on Lost?  And why did Jack say "bring my father down here, and if I'm drunker than he is..."?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 23, 2007, 08:31:54 PM
So...

What the fuck just happened on Lost?  And why did Jack say "bring my father down here, and if I'm drunker than he is..."?

Yeah, not a fucking clue.  I was thinking he was in the past until the whole Kate scene, so that line made sense at the time. Now, not a fucking clue.

And Charlie offed it.  Wasn't quite expecting that one.. nor the bulletproof VW bus.   I wonder if next season begins 'x-years later' or something.  That'd be some serious bs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 23, 2007, 09:43:10 PM
The Lost writers have invented the swirly plot.  Next year they'll have at least one less viewer.  Me!  I mean not me!  You know what I mean.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 23, 2007, 11:58:03 PM
How could you drop the show after that 2 hours? Fucking great television.

As for the "my father" thing, Jack was both drunk on tripping on Oxy. He is delusional. He knew his father was dead because he forged the Rx he was trying to fill and told the pharmacist that it was a waste of time trying to call him.  The guy he was talking to was the Chief of Surgery, which was the position his dad held if my memory serves. Jack was just fucked up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on May 24, 2007, 12:23:06 AM
How could you drop the show after that 2 hours? Fucking great television.

As for the "my father" thing, Jack was both drunk on tripping on Oxy. He is delusional. He knew his father was dead because he forged the Rx he was trying to fill and told the pharmacist that it was a waste of time trying to call him.  The guy he was talking to was the Chief of Surgery, which was the position his dad held if my memory serves. Jack was just fucked up.

Or it could merely be the future...OF AN ALTERNATE PAST.  My prediction is the series starts back in the civilized world, and Jack does a Desmond-style "life-rewind" where he doesn't use the phone. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 24, 2007, 04:58:09 AM
I thought the finale was superfuckingawesome.

Although, future-Kate looks a bit airbrushed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 24, 2007, 05:22:07 AM
The last episode was okay but I didn't understand it!  The ending didn't make a bit of sense to me.  I have no idea what the heck is going on.  At all.  In any of it's 47 sub plots.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on May 24, 2007, 05:25:51 AM
Jack being fucked up when he mentioned his father is the simplest answer, I just wasn't sure.  The perscription could simply have been that his father wouldn't give him painkillers and he would be ashamed to ask.  It just seemed odd that after at least a few years, he would think his dad was alive.  But he did say, "call my dad down here" and it's unlikely that his dad still works there after Jack had him fired... so he probably was just tripping.

I don't think it's a possible future though.  If that was the case, I don't think they would have made such a big deal about not telling us who died, or why noone went to his funeral.  Since it was in a poor black neighborhood, I'm guesssing it was Michael. 

I liked the show, except for the fact that they didn't answer a single fucking question and managed to raise a bunch more.  I was hoping for just a little resolution to some questions.  I also don't get why the island wanted indian-chick dead, since it healed her.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 24, 2007, 05:33:14 AM
Maybe he dad comes back.  They seem to do that there sometimes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 24, 2007, 08:48:32 AM
I keep questioning the island on the heal thing as well.  Mr. Badass Russian has been dead 4 times now, and he keeps getting up within hours, if not minutes.  If he had a higher body count, we could file him along with Freddy, Jason and Mike.   Meanwhile Locke and Ben heal at accelerated, but not normal rate, and I suspect if either one died they'd be gone for good.

It just seems sloppy at some point.

I'm guessing it was Walt in the coffin, actually.  It was a fairly small coffin, so I'm going with a kid. Meaning it's Walt or Aaron.

What really sucks is, like BSG that's it for 2007. No new episodes until Feburary '08.  WTF is up with TV shows suddenly deciding to pull this kind of crap.  At this rate, I expect we'll see Heroes stopping until 2010 after the next season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: AcidCat on May 24, 2007, 08:50:57 AM
Damn that Lost finale was the best two hours of network TV I've ever seen. Heaping bowls of awesome that I will still be digesting days from now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2007, 09:05:08 AM
There are all sort of hi-res, enhanced stills of the paper Jack is reading going around the net right now and all that is shows is Jo_____ (or Je_____)  ___atham of New York as the person who died and that they hanged themselves. So know one seems to have a clue.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 24, 2007, 10:06:50 AM
Some site I read today mentioned that Michael's full name was something like Jonathan Michael somethingorother.

Edit: It was Digg: " by nicc 1 hour ago 
[comment buried, show commenthide comment] + 2 diggs   the prevailing theory is that the casket is for Michael whose full name is Jonathan Michael Chantham and he is from NYC. the obit states that the man is from New York, his first name starts with a "J" and the last name ends in a "...tham"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 24, 2007, 11:16:42 AM
What happened to the big scary black cloud that was chasing everyone around?  Where did it go?  I keep thinking I must have missed some episodes but I don't think I did.  I even recorded it when we went away.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 24, 2007, 11:25:07 AM
You missed the epidsode where Jack manages to capture the cloud in a Ball jar and then he takes to to New Jersey.

He releases it there and hence the black cloud.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 24, 2007, 03:42:05 PM
I'd believe it. That show couldn't find itself for even a moment. Talk about writing at the last minute.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on May 24, 2007, 04:38:27 PM
Charlie wins the "Most Pointless Death Ever' award.  Because he couldn't just, you know, stand on the other side of the hatch and close it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 24, 2007, 05:16:19 PM
But if he doesn't die, the prophecy doesn't come true.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: squirrel on May 24, 2007, 05:23:01 PM
Charlie wins the "Most Pointless Death Ever' award.  Because he couldn't just, you know, stand on the other side of the hatch and close it.

Yeah - wow was I irritated with that scene, for a tonne of reasons. It really brought down what I considered otherwise a solid entertaining episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2007, 06:38:24 PM
He did it on purpose.  He considered it his destiny and a requirement for the rescue of Claire based upon Desmond's vision.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 24, 2007, 06:56:22 PM
He did it on purpose.  He considered it his destiny and a requirement for the rescue of Claire based upon Desmond's vision.

You should write the show.  At least you explain stuff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on May 24, 2007, 07:16:24 PM
He did it on purpose.  He considered it his destiny and a requirement for the rescue of Claire based upon Desmond's vision.

So in other words, Desmond killed him.  If he had just kept his mouth shut Charlie wouldn't have entered himself into the Darwin Awards.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2007, 07:24:36 PM
Eh. It's one of those chicken and egg things. Desmond had saved him 4 times previously from being killed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on May 24, 2007, 07:35:05 PM
I think it was mostly to keep Desmond out of the room to see Penelope.  Desmond had him all prepared to die, so he didn't do what any normal person would have done: save themself first.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on May 24, 2007, 08:01:24 PM
Eh. It's one of those chicken and egg things. Desmond had saved him 4 times previously from being killed.

Which is why he didn't need to die that time either, the way it was written.  Now don't get me wrong, Charlie was annoying and I don't mind seeing him go.  It just seems that the scene could have been written much, much better pretty much from top to bottom.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 24, 2007, 08:48:26 PM
But him not dying changed outcomes. He was convinced his death was necessary for the quid pro quo of Claire getting rescued. It might not have needed to happen that way, but that was his mindset for the last two episodes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on May 25, 2007, 07:22:06 AM
I am miffed that the purpose of the Others has not been revealed even after a whole season of hanging out with these people.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on May 25, 2007, 08:01:25 AM
I get the whole "Charlie thought he had to die in order to save Claire & little whatshisname" thing.  Still, I would have liked it better if they had put him in some situation where he had to get himself killed in order to flip the switch or to save Desmond from dying.  They way they played it (hey, I could easily just swim out of here to the surface even if there weren't scuba suits lying about [after all, I swam down here], and even though we've accomplished everything we came here to accomplish and my death won't further any of our objectives, I'm going to commit suicide because Desmond told me he had a vision that I'd die after flipping the switch) lacks intuitive plausibility.  Sure, it could be the case that if Charlie went back to the surface he would somehow fuck things up to prevent "rescue" by whatever nefarious group Naomi works for, but it's just unwieldy when you could easily put him in a situation where his sacrifice makes some evident sense.  His conversion is also hard to square with the fact that just a couple hours earlier, when he thought he could save the day and stay alive after realizing the station was full of air, he was ecstatic about it.  I don't think it was a huge problem, I just think it was too distracting and not in step with the rest of the show. 

On the "who is dead" thing, I have to imagine the lost people knew internet fans would see the obituary, so I think it's probably a red herring.  Did we ever learn Ben's full name?  If not, I'm going with Jeremy Bentham to keep up the British philosopher theme and underline Ben's brutal utilitarian calculus.  I though the guy in the coffin was Ben from the start (or possibly Sawyer, if he does something bad to Kate later on), so I'm naturally inclined to buy theories that jibe with my preexisting beliefs :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 25, 2007, 09:03:44 AM
Overall I liked the Lost season finale. Charlie might have been able to save himself, if he waited with the air until the chamber filled up, then tried to swim out the hole. He was wee enough to fit I think. I hated that he died, even though the writers pretty much told us all along that he was going to die. I was just hoping they'd find a way to "change the future."

Based on Charlie dying, I think the future we see with Jack at the end is a certainty. It's bizarre, though. Kate is obviously with Sawyer. Did Jack say "He died?" I would have thought it was Juliet otherwise.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 25, 2007, 01:52:52 PM
Ads are starting to pop up for the new season of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on May 26, 2007, 08:44:00 AM
Thought about making a thread of its own...

Anyhoot, this (http://www.starwars.com/video/view/000486.html) looks  a w e s o m e.

June 17, 2007.  Gotta remember this.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 26, 2007, 10:58:27 AM
That is going to kick so much ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zonk on May 26, 2007, 04:11:28 PM
Based on Charlie dying, I think the future we see with Jack at the end is a certainty. It's bizarre, though.

I would agree, and I find it more than a little bit frustrating. I hate the idea of watching a story for the first time where I already know the ending. WWII movies aside, the ultimate reason I didn't enjoy the Star Wars prequel trilogy is because all the 'tension' was moot: I knew how things turned out.

My hope is that the flashforward we saw was just one possible future, and next season will be spent trying to stop that from happening. I'm glad they're going with the 'set timetable, only a few episodes a season' HBO approach from now on. Lost really needs that kind of focus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on May 26, 2007, 10:41:59 PM
There is no way that is the definite future.  Being overweight and growing a beard is the one sure television sign of a dystopian future/alternate universe that must not come to pass.  I stand by my theory that future dystopian Jack time travels or somesuch, like Desmond. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on May 27, 2007, 12:36:01 AM
It's not hell and it's not purgatory. Too many people in the outside world interact with it.

I'm waiting for them to find a can of Ubik.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 28, 2007, 05:07:55 PM
In case you haven't been watching History Channel for the last week or so, there's a 2-hour special called "Star Wars: The Legacy Revealed" on tonight.  Think of it as a visual Joseph Campbell book, but aimed exclusively at Star Wars.   There's also a "Star Wars Tech" (in the Modern Marvels paradigm) show that will show before and after the special.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on May 28, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
How is anyone not incredibly sick of Star Wars at this point?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 28, 2007, 05:52:35 PM
How is anyone not incredibly sick of Star Wars at this point?

Same way others aren't sick of Star Trek, Anime or MMOs I imagine.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 29, 2007, 02:01:20 PM
How is anyone not incredibly sick of Star Wars at this point?

Easy.  I have only seen Star Wars about three times, which is about one more than the number of times I have seen The Star Wars holiday Special.  Did not play SWG.  Did play the KotORs.  Did not watch any Star Wars Cartoon.  Did not have any of the toys.  So I figure the Robot Chicken version will be a hoot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on May 29, 2007, 02:20:47 PM
Sorry, to clarify I think the Robot Chicken thing will be a hoot too, I was talking about the history channel specials.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on May 29, 2007, 02:29:45 PM
The History Channel thing could go either way.  I would be mostly interested in learning about Lucas' source material.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 29, 2007, 02:38:32 PM
The History Channel thing could go either way.  I would be mostly interested in learning about Lucas' source material.

T'was nifty.  Like I said was more of a visual Joseph Campbell dissection of the entire 6-movie arc than anything else.  Lots of people (Kevin Smith, Tom Brokaw, Joss Whedon, JJ Abrams) talking about their views on SW's cultural impact, interspersed with academics who would talk about the literary and mythological parallels. 

The Tech thing was just your usual examination of, "Oh this wouldn't work because of physics" (sound in space) and "well, we're damn close to having this" or "we've got a working miniature version, so as the tech develops, it's entirely plausible we could see something like that." (mentally/ nerve controlled robotic limbs and Plasma shields/ space "windows")  Still, if you enjoy examinations of sci-fi science it was as good as the Star Trek one they did a few months back.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on June 06, 2007, 07:33:19 AM
So did anyone else watch the season finales of The Shield and/or The Riches?  Did anyone else feel like both of them felt very... unfinished?  Now Heroes and Grey's Anatomy both had great season finales, I thought.  Both of them wrapped up most of the season's storylines while adding in some forshadowing to next season.  The Sheild finale just felt like a typical episode.  It advanced plots but didn't really resolve anything.  The episode itself felt complete, but it certainly didn't feel like a complete season. 

The finale for The Riches was even worse with respect to wrapping up the season.  I guess it was trying to go for some kind of cliffhanger, but it ended up feeling like the episode itself just had the end chopped off.  I was really surprised to see ending credits start up where there should have been at least 10 more minutes of episode.  I enjoy the show in spite of the fact that the plotlines are pretty far fetched, mostly because I really like the characters.  The good news is that it's been confirmed it's been renewed for another season.  It was just a very unsatisfying way to end the season, in my opinion.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on June 06, 2007, 07:53:40 AM
I don't think I have ever experienced so much anxious anticipation for a TV show as I am for the Sopranos finale since Twin Peaks season 1 back when I was an angsty teenager.  I think this season has been almost perfect thus far.  I can't believe they got Silv like that, without bringing anyone down with him :cry:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 06, 2007, 08:49:49 AM
Only thing we've been watching lately is Stewart and the Showtime series the Tudors. Tudors is a bit misguided, a lot of bad subplots. Overall it's not too bad, my girlfriend is a historical fiction buff so she likes it a bit more than I do. The biggest downfall is the shitty casting of Henry, the lead character. He and Lord Suffolk have the acting prowess of a pile of dirt. Luckily, almost every other actor and actress is well-cast. The Queen is amazing, easily the best, and Wolsey is good. The Princess, who just died (yay) was awful, some vapid supermodel and I simply couldn't stop obsessing on her freakish collagen-injected freak lips.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 06, 2007, 09:25:45 AM
I haven't watched the Shield season finale yet, but did they get renewed for another season? I was surprised at how quickly the finale came. It didn't even seem like the normal 13-episode run.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on June 06, 2007, 10:18:04 AM
This 'season' was actually originally the second half of last season, iirc.  It's supposed to be on for one more season, but I don't know if that's refering to a full season or these new half seasons.

Edit: Dirt was also renewed for another season in case you want to watch more Courtney Cox masturbating with a vibrator.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 06, 2007, 10:22:25 AM
Quote
Edit: Dirt was also renewed for another season in case you want to watch more Courtney Cox masturbating with a vibrator.

Nice. i need to catch up on it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 06, 2007, 10:50:10 AM
The last episode of The Sopranos seems to have already been leaked on the retardweb.  Also, someone leaked the winner of Gordon Ramsey's cooking competition show, Hell's Kitchen even though it the first episode was only aired on Monday.  Sheesh. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on June 06, 2007, 10:57:25 AM
The last episode of The Sopranos seems to have already been leaked on the retardweb.  Also, someone leaked the winner of Gordon Ramsey's cooking competition show, Hell's Kitchen even though it the first episode was only aired on Monday.  Sheesh. 

You sure do know alot about leaks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: trotski on June 06, 2007, 11:05:25 AM
The last episode of The Sopranos seems to have already been leaked on the retardweb.   

Part of me is praying the leaked ep is some sort of red herring...but who knows, I will be very disappointed if it is indeed how the show ends.

Regardless, I am unbelievably stoked for the last episode, and I'm having a Sopranos Finale Party at my house...Italian food, wine, and Sopranos.  Probably somewhat stereotypical, but meh, it'll be a good time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sauced on June 06, 2007, 11:07:59 AM
I loved the end of The Shield, but it was definitely a setup to a final season epic shitstorm.  Going to be a long wait.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on June 06, 2007, 11:42:10 AM
Yeah, what the fuck is up with them splitting the shield seasons into two parts?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on June 06, 2007, 12:01:58 PM
The last episode of The Sopranos seems to have already been leaked on the retardweb.   

Part of me is praying the leaked ep is some sort of red herring...but who knows, I will be very disappointed if it is indeed how the show ends.

Regardless, I am unbelievably stoked for the last episode, and I'm having a Sopranos Finale Party at my house...Italian food, wine, and Sopranos.  Probably somewhat stereotypical, but meh, it'll be a good time.

I think you should do an Entourage party instead- fast food, Cristal, pot, blow, and tons of high class call girls.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on June 06, 2007, 07:52:29 PM
Scifi channel is going to be showing Anime on Monday nights, it looks like every week will be eps from 3 different series, including Macross Plus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on June 07, 2007, 09:30:55 AM
CBS signed off on another seven episodes of Jericho after fans of the show shipped 20 tons of peanuts to the HQ. (http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/cnet/2007-06-07-peanuts-resurrect-jericho_N.htm)

I kinda liked the show. Not a bad spin on what would be the mother of all coups. It suffered from  the usual TV shortcomings, but I'm not disappointed to see it get one more shot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on June 07, 2007, 09:41:32 AM
CBS signed off on another seven episodes of Jericho after fans of the show shipped 20 tons of peanuts to the HQ. (http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/cnet/2007-06-07-peanuts-resurrect-jericho_N.htm)

I kinda liked the show. Not a bad spin on what would be the mother of all coups. It suffered from  the usual TV shortcomings, but I'm not disappointed to see it get one more shot.

From the very brief preview I gave it, it seemed like some high school drama but in the future.  Am I totally off base?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on June 07, 2007, 09:46:44 AM
From the very brief preview I gave it, it seemed like some high school drama but in the future.  Am I totally off base?

Uh... yeah.

Like Hrose talking about LOTRO off-base.

Jherico was about a small town in Colorodo dealing with the aftermath of a nuclear strike that wiped out lots of major cities in the US.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on June 07, 2007, 09:57:10 AM
Kansas, but it would have made more sense to be in Colorado, since they could actually see the mountains, which ain't happening in that area of the world.

Imagine if tomorrow afternoon, ten to 15 Nuclear weapons went off at various locations around the US.  Infrastructure shuts down, except for small pockets. The US Breaking up into five or six separate nations. Mass Chaos and devastation.

Now, film seventh heaven  in the middle of it.

There was a bit of Who's a good guy  or bad guy, Some love interests, and a home wrecker that made me give up on it for a while. The First third (shit blows up but we don't know how much) and the last third of the season (bad things happening and finding out how bad things really are) are decent. Heroes was ten times the show, but this was worth the half hour a week it took to watch it  with tivo.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on June 07, 2007, 10:04:50 AM
Kansas, but it would have made more sense to be in Colorado, since they could actually see the mountains, which ain't happening in that area of the world.

Woah, really? Kansas? WTF.. they had survivors trickling in from Denver and - like you mention - the mountains.   Hurk..

But then I didn't watch much, just caught an episode or two here and there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on June 07, 2007, 10:31:17 AM
it's believable that folks would come from the mountains and Denver to there, it's just another couple hundred miles, maybe the earth is smaller in Jericho's universe ;)

A dual tuner Tivo made possible picking up a lot of shows that would fall through the cracks otherwise. most of them ddeservedly so, but Jericho was alright. Nothing award winning, but it'll do.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on June 07, 2007, 01:49:13 PM
Now, film seventh heaven  in the middle of it.

There was a bit of Who's a good guy  or bad guy, Some love interests, and a home wrecker that made me give up on it for a while. The First third (shit blows up but we don't know how much) and the last third of the season (bad things happening and finding out how bad things really are) are decent.


Ah, that's what I meant.  I must of caught a shitty part.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on June 07, 2007, 10:14:58 PM
Comcast.

I have read nothing past this post but this made me giggle.  A LOT.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 08, 2007, 08:05:34 AM
I finally watched the Shield Season Finale. WTF? That's a season finale? Is it the first half of the season or the .5 part of the season? It didn't end well for a show which I don't expect to see for another what, 6 months to a year? Why did Vick stomp out of the review board hearing? And wasn't that in 3 days instead of that night? It was a good episode, just weird.

Shane is so dead.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on June 09, 2007, 06:49:26 PM
The Shield schedule got all messed up towards the end of season 5, they weren't sure how many more episodes there were going to be. Originally there were only going to be something like 6 more episodes after the end of season 5, then there was going to be one more season, then one and a half or something like that - hard to follow.

Basically the season we just saw was actually the end of season 5 and the start of season 6, or something like that...honestly I have no idea.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 10, 2007, 08:10:08 PM
Last episode of The Sopranos was ALMOST brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 10, 2007, 10:24:08 PM
I need to process it more. It was either a brilliant use of unresolved tension and red-herring threats as an allegory of current life in America, or a really cheap use of technique to obscure not having really any place to take the story to a conclusion.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 10, 2007, 10:27:59 PM
Last episode of The Sopranos was ALMOST brilliant.

Um.

What?


Seriously.  What?


I'm not sure if you're being your usual funny deadpan comedic self or actually being serious.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on June 11, 2007, 05:30:31 AM
I thought it was good.

Didn't care too much for the ending, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Selby on June 11, 2007, 05:51:08 AM
Didn't care too much for the ending, though.
Everybody I have talked to is furious about the ending.  Me, I personally felt they did a good job.  It ended however you wanted it to.  They set it up, and then let you decide.  I was expecting more, but considering the trend of having whole series of episodes where absolutely NOTHING happens in the past few seasons, it ended decently.  I'm glad it is over.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 11, 2007, 06:25:33 AM
I liked the ending too, very Sopranos-y.  A typical ending featuring a massive shootout isn't the way to end one of the more innovative shows ever made.  It would have felt like a hollow boilerplate type finale.

I bet the cable companies had to handle thousands and thousands of angry people calling up screaming about how their cable went out at the end.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on June 11, 2007, 06:32:55 AM
It took me about an hour to proccess it all, and to come down from the adreniline high of the last five minutes. Fucking Brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: RhyssaFireheart on June 11, 2007, 07:01:13 AM
I was one of those people going WTF?!?!?! at the ending, but the husband hit up the message boards after and read a few good theories about the ending there.

I guess one of the more popular explanations comes from something Tony and Bobby were talking about out in the boat up at the lake - how you never knew it when you got shot/died - didn't hear/see/feel anything.  That was someone with the theory that the either the guy who went into the bathroom came out and shot Tony or the two black guys who came in right before Meadow.  The husband is convinced Meadow was upset about something besides not able to parallel park properly.

Was I the only one that found Phil's death to be absolutely hysterical?  Yeah, if it had been real I would have been horrified, but seeing that just made both of us laugh.  All the buildup and then he gets taken out like that?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on June 11, 2007, 07:37:41 AM
I've read a bunch of theories already on the whole blackout thing, but I'm sticking with the "life goes on" theme. He gave us the one thing that we didn't expect - everything going Tony's way. Or at least as much as it ever does.

Phil's Dead
A.J.'s happy
Meadow seems to be accepting the family business
Carm's well, at least she isn't trying to leave him again
He seems to have found a new therapist to pursue

Sure, he's got the whole trial thing coming, but at this point, who knows what will happen with that. We got five minutes of the most tense TV I've ever seen, and then BAM! Nothing happened. Yea, I went through the whole WTF, did my cable die? thing, but once it was done and I reflected on the episode, I loved it.

One item I loved that I haven't seen discussed much yet is Paulie, and his whole turmoil at finally being offered some respect from Tony, and not knowing how to take it.

The whole episode had tons of great little moments, both in red herrings and in comedy bits. I loved AJ's comment on no SUVs as he hops in to the BMW, and then tries to justify it's milleage.

Janice's comment about getting past the shit from her Mom, and how no one thanks her for that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on June 11, 2007, 07:56:14 AM
I thought it was one of the better episodes in general, but the first thought that struck me after seeing the ending was "well, at least now the franchise is wide open for a Sopranos movie."



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 11, 2007, 08:05:25 AM
Yes, that's why I thought it was "almost" brilliant.  At the end of a series or a movie, whenever my first thought is, "Ah.  I guess there will be a sequel", I believe the ending is a cop out.  I don't mind if I still have questions after, or some is not completely resolved, but I like feeling at the end it is an end.  If they can work in a movie or something, fine... I just don't like that feeling that's why they ended it that way.  I loved all the confusion and excitement at the end, however.  The whole time I was saying to Righ, "it must be him!  No, him!  Who's that???  Look!  He stood up!"  If he'd been sitting close enough, I probably would have been poking him.  Poor Righ.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Simond on June 11, 2007, 08:20:40 AM
Time for some Dr Who: The latest (UK) episode was low budget, Doctor-light...and utterly awesome. Clever use of time travel, a new enemy with amazing-yet-dirt-cheap 'costumes', and a real horror movie vibe.

And if the last 15 seconds didn't instill a severe phobia of statues in small children nationwide, there's no justice.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: RhyssaFireheart on June 11, 2007, 08:35:50 AM
Yes, that's why I thought it was "almost" brilliant.  At the end of a series or a movie, whenever my first thought is, "Ah.  I guess there will be a sequel", I believe the ending is a cop out.  I don't mind if I still have questions after, or some is not completely resolved, but I like feeling at the end it is an end.  If they can work in a movie or something, fine... I just don't like that feeling that's why they ended it that way.  I loved all the confusion and excitement at the end, however.  The whole time I was saying to Righ, "it must be him!  No, him!  Who's that???  Look!  He stood up!"  If he'd been sitting close enough, I probably would have been poking him.  Poor Righ.

Exactly!  I kept thinking it was going to be the guy with the vest shooting.  Then the nervous looking guy at the counter.  Then the two punks...  It was tense.  And then.... nothing.  My husband said it was open for a movie as well, but I hope they don't go that route.  The ending will have people speculating about it for a while, but a movie would answer any questions and ruin the whole "what do you think happened?" part.  They did a good job of wrapping everything up, I'll give them that.  Tony manipulating Paulie into taking the cursed position was funny as well.  He really does know what buttons to push to get his way.

The Chicago Trib ran a contest for people to write in and guess the ending.  Most went with the blazing shoot-out ending, but a few said that Tony would be sitting on the deck by the pool and the ducks would move back in.  I'm glad it wasn't either to be honest.  Too cliche all around.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 11, 2007, 08:46:36 AM
Time for some Dr Who: The latest (UK) episode was low budget, Doctor-light...and utterly awesome. Clever use of time travel, a new enemy with amazing-yet-dirt-cheap 'costumes', and a real horror movie vibe.

And if the last 15 seconds didn't instill a severe phobia of statues in small children nationwide, there's no justice.

One of the best I've seen yet with clever, clever writing and some great acting.  The fact that it was almost entirely devoid of The Doctor was doubly impressive.  I'm always up for a Wibbly Wobbly, Timey-Wimey explanation.  Cutting the fat out of episodes for a 45 burst is the best thing the revisited Dr Who has ever done.

Tho I'm sure I had a thread devoted to this topic buried somewhere...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on June 11, 2007, 09:14:38 AM
I have never felt so tense watching TV in my life as I did during the last scene of the Sopranos finale.  I figured they would go with the "same as it ever was" ending with the last scene being Tony going out to pick up the paper or whatever.  But I was just begging for the episode to end whichever way as the tension built in that scene.

I think it's a good way of leaving us with a shot inside Tony's mind.  This is what his life has always been, this is what his life will always be.  Always on guard, always waiting for the other shoe to drop.  Except when he distracts himself with momentary pleasures. 

Love how they seduced AJ to a conventional life while Meadow seduced herself.

A+  Only thing I would have liked to see was some Melfi.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on June 11, 2007, 10:34:18 AM
A+  Only thing I would have liked to see was some Melfi.

Speaking of Melfi, I was so disappointed that Tony never avenged her rape.  I really really really really really wanted that guy to be tortured and then killed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sauced on June 11, 2007, 10:37:39 AM
Sure, but that would have been the end of the only person on the show with moral character.

I thought it was brilliant, personally.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 11, 2007, 10:41:14 AM
They left a lot of the old plot threads unfinished, which is fine.

It would have been funny if the ending consisted of that Russian Chrissy and Pauly wounded but might not have killed in the forest came out of nowhere and just gunned down everyone at the safehouse :lol:.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: trotski on June 11, 2007, 01:59:07 PM
I liked the episode, it was a little hard to follow what was the possibly the best Sopranos episode of all time, last week.  But good none the less.

The ending was great, although I did the same thing and curse HBO for what I thought was a blackout.  And for the record, I'm in the Tony's dead camp.  Just too much information points in that direction.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 11, 2007, 06:35:21 PM
I seriously doubt Chase will do a movie based upon everyhing I have read. After procesing it since yesterday, I am coming down on the brilliant camp.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: El Gallo on June 12, 2007, 09:30:23 PM
I am looking forward to the Simpsons doing their take on the Sopranos ending.  This will be a hackneyed cliche cultural reference for a long time, and I wonder if we'll forget the impact it had initially.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on June 27, 2007, 11:13:06 AM
Family Guy jumps on the Star Wars bandwagon:
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117965865.html?categoryid=1237&cs=1

I just watched the Star Wars Robot Chicken episode last night.  It wasn't bad.  I noticed Seth McFarlane used three different voices in as many portrayals of Palpatine, starting with Quagmire then Brian and finally Stewie.  This is OK, since that is two more voices than Steven Blum has.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 27, 2007, 11:34:06 AM
I think someone posted a trailer of that Family Guy episode, it looks pretty funny.

Yeah, here it is. (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=6536.msg311210#msg311210)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 27, 2007, 11:37:52 AM
"John from Cincinnati" is actually pretty decent.  I'm liking it a lot so far and am already into the "I can't wait for the next episode" mode.

The premise isn't very interesting honestly.  The acting by the kid in it is cringe worthy. The Deadwood style dialog (in spots) can be a little disjointing (Charlie Utter still talks like Charlie Utter).  But somehow, it just works.  This could be a very enjoyable series if it's allowed to play out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on June 27, 2007, 12:16:34 PM
I thought it was a lttle better than okay.  Part of RC's charm is the surprise of unexpected references.  That is washed out when it is limited to a theme.

I really like the (non) ending of SG1. While it didn't settle anything, it did seem to complete the "Earth becoming a mature civilization" theme.  I hope they make the movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 27, 2007, 12:23:59 PM
The onion provides closure to those who didn't like the Sopranos ending. (http://www.theonion.com/content/news/james_gandolfini_shot_by_closure)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on June 28, 2007, 08:41:29 PM
Burn Notice was pretty decent. Tried to be a little too slick for me, but it's early yet.  I'll give it a shot over the summer at least, if only to see Bruce in another TV series.  Anyone else catch it?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 28, 2007, 09:25:50 PM
The commercials for Burn Notice looked interesting, but missed the premier.  Would have definitely caught it if I knew that Bruce Campbell is in it.

Finally caught Rescue Me this week....  alot of Dennis Leary's character doing his awkward lieing schtick.  Looks like they killed off a major character at the end of the episode, though.

Proby and Garrity continue to be comedy gold.  Uncle Teddy was also relatively amusing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 29, 2007, 09:17:14 AM
Bruce Campbell is in another series called Burn Notice? What channel is it on?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on June 29, 2007, 09:37:39 AM
Bruce Campbell is in another series called Burn Notice? What channel is it on?

He's a guest-star, not the main character.  It's on USA, Thursdays at 10.   It's about a spy who's been fired, the "burn notice" but he doesn't know why.  The gov't is stalking him to keep an eye out and has frozen all his assets, etc, and he has to stay in Miami 'or else.'   Bruce plays one of his friends, a former agent from the 80's who's also retired in Miami.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 29, 2007, 09:39:03 AM
I remember seeing a preview for that, and promptly forgetting about it. I'll have to search the Tivo for it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 30, 2007, 07:45:15 AM
The David Milch School Of Screenwriting (http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/david-milch-screenwriting.php)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 02, 2007, 08:53:08 AM
The David Milch School Of Screenwriting (http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/david-milch-screenwriting.php)

Awesome. I will never forgive that fucker for leaving Deadwood hanging.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on July 02, 2007, 11:26:11 AM
I don't see any talk about John From Cincinnati here yet. 4 episodes in and I am totally hooked. I think the guy playing John is brilliant, and the Deadwood-esque speak gives it a little edge.

What do you guys think?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 02, 2007, 12:21:22 PM
I didn't know that guy was making that new show I had no idea about. It's a dumb name. I thought maybe John Ritter was in it.

I fuckin' loved Deadwood. What a waste of talent. I have a hard time imagining a cast as brilliant as the Deadwood cast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 02, 2007, 12:31:04 PM
I don't see any talk about John From Cincinnati here yet. 4 episodes in and I am totally hooked. I think the guy playing John is brilliant, and the Deadwood-esque speak gives it a little edge.

What do you guys think?

We've been watching from the start and I like it a lot.  I didn't know who was making it the frist time we saw it but the Deadwood candence made it pretty obvious. 

FYI  Dexter comes back on September 30!  Yay!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on July 02, 2007, 12:45:06 PM
I didn't know that guy was making that new show I had no idea about. It's a dumb name. I thought maybe John Ritter was in it.

I fuckin' loved Deadwood. What a waste of talent. I have a hard time imagining a cast as brilliant as the Deadwood cast.

You have to watch the show to understand. I am totally hooked. Probably helps that I live close to the area the show is set in, and grew up in the surf culture. But damn, I enjoy that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on July 02, 2007, 04:22:46 PM
I thought maybe John Ritter was in it.

Now that would certainly be a trick. I take it Signe was the casting agent?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on July 02, 2007, 04:31:08 PM
I don't see any talk about John From Cincinnati here yet. 4 episodes in and I am totally hooked. I think the guy playing John is brilliant, and the Deadwood-esque speak gives it a little edge.

What do you guys think?

Quote from: me, previous page
"John from Cincinnati" is actually pretty decent.  I'm liking it a lot so far and am already into the "I can't wait for the next episode" mode.

The premise isn't very interesting honestly.  The acting by the kid in it is cringe worthy. The Deadwood style dialog (in spots) can be a little disjointing (Charlie Utter still talks like Charlie Utter).  But somehow, it just works.  This could be a very enjoyable series if it's allowed to play out.

Haven't seen episode 4 yet. The HD run of the show comes on after my wife likes watching TV, so I'll probably watch it tonight.

And John is just awesome.  Great character played by the evil American from Wimbledon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 02, 2007, 04:35:26 PM
No more zombie jokes.  I'm all about the milk these days. 

John From Cincinnati is a lot more than surfing, though.  In fact, when I saw the start, I was sure I wasn't going to enjoy it BECAUSE of the surfing.  I was wrong.  It's very good.  Excellent character development, too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 03, 2007, 06:14:03 AM
I think that's a genetically modified cow. Its brains are in its udder. Carry on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on July 03, 2007, 12:01:30 PM
Al Bundy is in it. How can you not like a show with Al Bundy?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on July 03, 2007, 12:43:45 PM
The acting by the kid in it is cringe worthy.

I agree to an extent, but growing up here (Southern California) I did know a few kids that acted just like that kid. So its ether horrible, or brilliant. I cant decide yet. Also, I loved Episode 4. I also am to the "I cant wait for next week" feeling. Hell, I am sort of considering stopping watching the show just so I can watch it on DVD.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 08, 2007, 07:08:23 PM
My favorite line by far has to be Steady Fready's from last week when the hottie asks for Butchie.

Care to leave a message...on my face...with your ass?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 09, 2007, 07:01:56 AM
Is that some kind of scatological come-on? Eeeww.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on July 09, 2007, 10:00:48 AM
Latest episode was your typical Milch momentum killer.  His shows have a great way of losing traction.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 09, 2007, 10:18:19 AM
I didn't enjoy last night's episode very much.  It did seem rather disjointed.   :|


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 09, 2007, 12:32:57 PM
Bruce Campbell is in another series called Burn Notice? What channel is it on?

He's a guest-star, not the main character.  It's on USA, Thursdays at 10.   It's about a spy who's been fired, the "burn notice" but he doesn't know why.  The gov't is stalking him to keep an eye out and has frozen all his assets, etc, and he has to stay in Miami 'or else.'   Bruce plays one of his friends, a former agent from the 80's who's also retired in Miami.

For those who have not watched this show, DO SO. It is fucking great. The main character is played by Jeffrey Donovan, who I love from an old USA series that only lasted 1 season, Touching Evil. That was a great show, and this is better. Lots of clever funny lines and decent plots.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 09, 2007, 12:44:52 PM
The weather has gone from constant TStorms and rain to hazy, hot and humid so I've been watching a bit too much TV lately.  I did see Burn Notice (twice now) and I like it.  It's very funny. 

A remake of Evil Dead is in the works, but there will be no Ash.  Bruce Campbell and Sam Rami are producing it.   Someone has started a rumour that Uwe Boll might direct.   That can not be allowed to happen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on July 09, 2007, 12:52:40 PM
I just have to post this Signe-friendly picture - make sure to eat right!
(http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/9460/zfpwr9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on July 09, 2007, 12:53:50 PM
Just how much liver constitutes a servering of liver Signe?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 09, 2007, 03:26:00 PM
IMMA VEGAMATARIANIST!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 09, 2007, 03:33:09 PM
Bruce Campbell is in another series called Burn Notice? What channel is it on?

He's a guest-star, not the main character.  It's on USA, Thursdays at 10.   It's about a spy who's been fired, the "burn notice" but he doesn't know why.  The gov't is stalking him to keep an eye out and has frozen all his assets, etc, and he has to stay in Miami 'or else.'   Bruce plays one of his friends, a former agent from the 80's who's also retired in Miami.

For those who have not watched this show, DO SO. It is fucking great. The main character is played by Jeffrey Donovan, who I love from an old USA series that only lasted 1 season, Touching Evil. That was a great show, and this is better. Lots of clever funny lines and decent plots.

I had it on while reading the other day.  It's a very typical summer run Cable program:  quirky,  of good quality,  that you'll enjoy watching.  Just like most of the other stuff I've generally enjoyed when I caught,  but haven't made the time to regularly watch (Eureka, Monk, etc.).

I like the age of designer/niche TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Chimpy on July 09, 2007, 04:59:48 PM
I just have to post this Signe-friendly picture - make sure to eat right!
(http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/9460/zfpwr9.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

Best.
Picture.
Ever.

:vv:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on July 09, 2007, 05:23:16 PM
I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but I'm still enjoying the hell out of 4400.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: RhyssaFireheart on July 09, 2007, 10:16:32 PM
Has anyone caught Ice Road Truckers (http://www.history.com/minisites/iceroadtruckers) Sundays on the History channel?  Those are some crazy truck drivers, but I find it interesting to watch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on July 10, 2007, 07:41:47 AM
I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but I'm still enjoying the hell out of 4400.

4400 has been fairly interesting this season so far.  It's been better since they abandoned the crappy X-Files thing they originally seemed to be going for a few season back.  It's no Heroes but it's entertaining.  I hope they keep exploring the themes of the impact of promicin on society.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 10, 2007, 07:59:03 AM
IMMA VEGAMATARIANIST!
You eat dead retards?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on July 10, 2007, 08:51:32 AM
John From Cincinnati is a lot more than surfing, though.  In fact, when I saw the start, I was sure I wasn't going to enjoy it BECAUSE of the surfing.  I was wrong.  It's very good.  Excellent character development, too.

It reminds me of Deadwood.  It's got some of the Deadwood actors, and surely some of the scriptwriters.

I'm liking it, teetering on the edge of loving it or not though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morfiend on July 17, 2007, 03:27:42 PM
John From Cincinnati is a lot more than surfing, though.  In fact, when I saw the start, I was sure I wasn't going to enjoy it BECAUSE of the surfing.  I was wrong.  It's very good.  Excellent character development, too.

It reminds me of Deadwood.  It's got some of the Deadwood actors, and surely some of the scriptwriters.

I'm liking it, teetering on the edge of loving it or not though.

The show last week was not good. This last Sundays was amazing. The end was really good, if fucking weird as all hell.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 17, 2007, 05:21:21 PM
Some interesting stuff gleaned from aintitcool.com

- Scifi channel is producing Farscape webisodes (Henson team is on board,  but don't say if they're covering Crichton or not) and webisodes of Adama's early years. 

- The Deadwood TV Movie deal to tie up the story line may be in trouble.  Milch appears to not be pushing it,  and a large portion of the cast has other committments.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on July 18, 2007, 08:43:15 PM
Sooo.... the first 2 episodes of Dexter have hit the internet.  Curse those fuckers for pushing the air date to September.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 20, 2007, 11:03:58 PM
I'm looking forward to Damages on FX, I love me some Glenn Close. She's good in everything.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on July 21, 2007, 01:06:27 AM
Reaper, on the CW, seems like a pretty funny show.

http://cwtv.com/thecw/reaper (http://cwtv.com/thecw/reaper)

I watched the first episode and laughed out loud a few times.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on July 23, 2007, 12:38:38 PM
Hi, I just arrived from 2003, I'm watching a great show called Entourage on HBO.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on July 23, 2007, 12:39:12 PM
Oh wait - no I'm getting it on Netflix. Damn... That was creepy. I'm in the right time again!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 24, 2007, 07:11:28 AM
Finally getting around to watching some more of Planet Earth we DVR'd off Discovery HD. Not only is the HD footage amazing, the stuff they captured is just insane. Some of the best nature footage ever shot imo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 24, 2007, 09:31:36 AM
Hi, I just arrived from 2003, I'm watching a great show called Entourage on HBO.

I have the first 2 seasons on DVD- you should have borrowed them, n00b.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Hayduke on July 24, 2007, 09:56:13 PM
Entourage is great, but I prefer my fantasy fiction to have lasers and starships.  The guy playing Vincent Chase being a sex idol is just too far-fetched even for me, they could give that role to Sanjaya and it'd be less of a miscast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on July 25, 2007, 11:33:14 AM
So I finally finished watching Season 3 of Doctor Who last night. You now all have my permission to discuss it here.

I love the "sutble" political inuendos the show has had. "Wow! We just managed to turn back time and undo every horrible thing that happened in the last year - starting ten seconds after the President of the USA got disintegrated."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on July 25, 2007, 12:46:49 PM
You mean that wasn't a horrible thing ?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on July 25, 2007, 01:11:34 PM
I just can't stand Mickey and my viewing of the show has suffered greatly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Engels on July 25, 2007, 01:24:03 PM
So anyone here into the series "Hustle", from the BBC? I just got done with season 1 on DVD, and I was pleasantly surprised. Its about five con artists running short/long cons each episode. So far, its been pretty fun. The cons aren't The Sting level of cleverness, but enough to hang on some semi-decent character development on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 25, 2007, 03:01:03 PM
Damages was pretty good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on July 25, 2007, 03:16:02 PM
So anyone here into the series "Hustle", from the BBC? I just got done with season 1 on DVD, and I was pleasantly surprised. Its about five con artists running short/long cons each episode. So far, its been pretty fun. The cons aren't The Sting level of cleverness, but enough to hang on some semi-decent character development on.

You'll wish it'd stopped at two seasons.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on July 25, 2007, 04:59:24 PM
Damages was pretty good.

Something about it bothers me, but I can't quite figure out what it was.  Something about Close's character seeming too unreal and evil already.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on July 25, 2007, 05:18:56 PM
It is certainly a bit dramatic, but so is most FX stuff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 27, 2007, 10:35:06 PM
Not sure if it has been mentioned, but Dogfights on the History Channel is a fantastic show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on July 28, 2007, 01:03:34 AM
Hi, I just arrived from 2003, I'm watching a great show called Entourage on HBO.

I have the first 2 seasons on DVD- you should have borrowed them, n00b.

Bring over season 2!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 29, 2007, 11:11:47 AM
Damages was pretty good.

Something about it bothers me, but I can't quite figure out what it was.  Something about Close's character seeming too unreal and evil already.

Danson's onus of moral culpability is focused on his family.  He has regrets about what he did,  but he will sacrifice his employees to make sure that no doom will befall is blood.

Close is a Crusader.  She sees what is right,  and is willing to make the small sacrifices for the greater good.  Sacrifice others and even her own family.  She has little respect for individuals,  and feels only that her will can guide them to the just result.  She has regrets that she can't be ordinary,  and take joy in simple things.

Very good show. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on July 30, 2007, 02:59:22 AM
Just started watching "Mad Men" on AMC.

Very high quality drama, centered around an early 1960's Madison Avenue advertising executive.  Quite a few uncomfortable scenes regarding racism, sexual harassment, smoking and psychiatry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Men (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Men)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 30, 2007, 10:49:52 AM
Hi, I just arrived from 2003, I'm watching a great show called Entourage on HBO.

I have the first 2 seasons on DVD- you should have borrowed them, n00b.

Bring over season 2!

I will be home by about 6:30 tonight. You know where I live.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Venkman on July 30, 2007, 03:50:10 PM
Been watching Burn Notice and actually like it. Some wierd camera work that takes getting used to. And it is just another in a long line of formulaec "reluctant detective with issues" show, but it is fun.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 06, 2007, 03:39:41 PM
Is there any chance this new flash gordon show is not complete crap?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 06, 2007, 03:49:25 PM
Is there any chance this new flash gordon show is not complete crap?

Not if it wants to remain true to the source.

FLASH, AHAAAAAA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQVLFn2PTzY)*


(Yes I know Flash is older than that.)



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on August 06, 2007, 10:38:34 PM
That movie had the Queen soundtrack going for it. That alone elated it over the crap category. It looks quite ridiculous, but it still sounds good!

The new series won't have that benefit, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on August 07, 2007, 11:50:57 AM
Season Two of The Tick came out today.  For some (probably legal) reason the bastards left out the episode with the Galactus parody where The Tick was sent to blow the "CHA" out of the moon.  Shitheads.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 08, 2007, 12:51:20 AM
That movie had the Queen soundtrack going for it. That alone elated it over the crap category. It looks quite ridiculous, but it still sounds good!

The new series won't have that benefit, though.

The Movie had a Blue Peter presenter poisoned then skewered.

It was awesome in every way shape and form.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on August 08, 2007, 04:14:12 AM
Of course, most of the actors where European. There had to be a Blue Peter presenter in there as well :)



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 08, 2007, 09:36:22 AM
You know why Timothy Dalton never worked for me as Bond?  In my mind I kept seeing him running around in green and hearing "Flash! Ahaahh.."

They needed Brian Blessed as a villan for Dalton.

"No Mr. Bond, I expect you to DIIIIIIIIIII(v)E!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on August 08, 2007, 09:40:06 AM
Is there any chance this new flash gordon show is not complete crap?

What pisses me off is that they took Dresden Files off for friggin that Flash Gordon and Painkiller Jane crap. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 08, 2007, 09:47:25 AM
I think this Flash Gordon TV series IS using the Queen theme song. There's awesome on a bun. And being that Flash Gordon has ALWAYS been campy, my expectations are that I won't really care if they go silly on it, I'll probably like it anyway.

Did they not renew Dresden Files for a second season?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on August 08, 2007, 10:52:07 AM
Did they not renew Dresden Files for a second season?

Nope. (http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Roush-Dispatch/Dresden-Sci-Fis/800019821)  I found the show pretty dull, to be honest.  Still, it wasn't that bad and was certainly better than the majority of the crap that's shown on Sci Fi.  How Painkiller Pain Jane* managed to warrant 22 episodes to Dresden's 12 is beyond me.

*Edit: Fixed, but the mistake probably better reflects the series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on August 08, 2007, 10:56:36 AM
Did they not renew Dresden Files for a second season?

Nope. (http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Roush-Dispatch/Dresden-Sci-Fis/800019821)  I found the show pretty dull, to be honest.  Still, it wasn't that bad and was certainly better than the majority of the crap that's shown on Sci Fi.  How Painkiller Pain managed to warrant 22 episodes to Dresden's 12 is beyond me.

This satisfies my nerdrage.  The show (at least the first five or so I watched) was a complete affront to the books.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on August 08, 2007, 11:06:04 AM
Did they not renew Dresden Files for a second season?

Nope. (http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Roush-Dispatch/Dresden-Sci-Fis/800019821)  I found the show pretty dull, to be honest.  Still, it wasn't that bad and was certainly better than the majority of the crap that's shown on Sci Fi.  How Painkiller Pain managed to warrant 22 episodes to Dresden's 12 is beyond me.

This satisfies my nerdrage.  The show (at least the first five or so I watched) was a complete affront to the books.

I had actually never heard of Dresden Files before the TV show.  This is the same with most of the people I know.  The books are superior, of course, but I found the show better then nothing, and at least one of the better Sci Fi shows for certain.  BSG being the only other one I really watch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 08, 2007, 11:10:08 AM
Dresden had potential that the writers just never seemed capable of pulling off. The episodes were too scattered to have hard continuity and they never seemed to get beyond "magic baddie of the week" syndrome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on August 08, 2007, 12:00:27 PM
Dresden had potential that the writers just never seemed capable of pulling off. The episodes were too scattered to have hard continuity and they never seemed to get beyond "magic baddie of the week" syndrome.

If you've read the books that "magic baddie of the week" is almost the same formula.  The books themselves are a fun read but I don't think they are very deep in and of themselves.  I think the 12 episode season was also a problem, I think given more time and more of a commitment the show would have been alot better.  At least Paul Blackthorne got himself a new job on ABC (I think) in a prime time gig.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 08, 2007, 03:35:46 PM
Dresden had potential that the writers just never seemed capable of pulling off. The episodes were too scattered to have hard continuity and they never seemed to get beyond "magic baddie of the week" syndrome.

Like Evildrider, I'd never heard of the books until I saw you all bitching about them.  Watching the show, it felt very much like "Charmed with a 30 year old man"

I can see why it failed.  Charmed sucked, and was saved only by boobies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 11, 2007, 07:23:55 AM
They totally fucked up Ming.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 11, 2007, 07:31:03 AM
They totally fucked up Ming.

The whole damn show put me to sleep.  Too much angst and "wahhh, DADDY" not enough action. It's fucking FLASH GORDON, and the most action we got was him beating up a robot with a frying pan at the midway point.  Maybe they can salvage it, but the "Coming up" preview looked like too many disparate episodes mashed together to show action.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: angry.bob on August 11, 2007, 08:11:49 PM
They totally fucked up Ming.

In every way. They should have gotten George Takei. I bet he's cheap and available, and he's proven to be able to do hamfisted, over-the-top self importance. Slap on a sequined robe, skullcap, a Fu Manchu goatee and BAM! Ming. I have no idea what they're going for with a 30 year old blonde surfer ming. He lloks like he would have had his daughter when he was 8. And his daughter needed to be way hotter. She reminded me of a bank teller. I don't want Ming's daughter to remind me of a bank teller.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on August 12, 2007, 11:19:20 AM
I don't think George Takei is either cheap or available right now, being in Heroes and all.

The rest I agree with. What the fuck was that? Why did they call that thing Flash Gordon, just so that they could reuse some names and don't have to think up ones on their own?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 13, 2007, 08:41:09 AM
Yeah, I blogged about the great big pile of meh that was Flash Gordon. It had nothing in common with any of the Gordon mythos, and just ended up being generic, mediocre schlock.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 14, 2007, 06:50:07 AM
I had it lined up for the DVR, but I watched the first fifteen-twenty minutes and cancelled it. That show sucked. Never got to see Ming get fucked up.

I am mildly enjoying Blade, though. They're airing the series in HD and I've been DVRing it. Pretty schlocky, but not too bad. They have also been doing Stargate Atlantis, but is suprises me how many filler episodes that show has already. I've skipped about half of them. Mostly waiting for it to catch up to the SciFi timeline and start watching new eps in HD.

Also, when is BSG's next season starting in HD fer crissakes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 14, 2007, 02:53:30 PM
Also, when is BSG's next season starting in HD fer crissakes.

The HD season was about 3-6 months behind the regular season, wasn't it?   If so you've got ~8 months to a year.  The next regular season doesn't start until Januaryish of '08.  Bastards.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 14, 2007, 02:57:32 PM
Yep.  TV sucks.

I'm totally excited about that GEICO caveman show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 14, 2007, 03:01:03 PM
Is Blade the vampire show? I enjoyed that; in fact I wrote a review of it here.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 14, 2007, 05:32:13 PM
Anyone else enjoying Damages as much as I am?  Loving Danson and Glen Close.  Great to see a show where you can't tell the good guys from the bad guys.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 15, 2007, 08:52:21 AM
I saw an episode of Magnum P.I. last weekend where Ted Danson was the villain.  His bald spot was pretty obvious during a couple scenes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on August 15, 2007, 07:16:55 PM
Anyone else enjoying Damages as much as I am?  Loving Danson and Glen Close.  Great to see a show where you can't tell the good guys from the bad guys.

Yeah, I look forward to watching it.  Compelling.

Right now it's Damages and Flight of the Concords.  Big Love had what I thought was a terrific episode 2 or 3 back - it really sucked me in.  Rescue Me is another favorite, although weaker this season, I think. 

The Shield is my most-looking-forward-to series.  I swear, it's the best series I've ever seen on TV, and it keeps getting better and better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 16, 2007, 09:42:29 PM
I love Glenn Close. But after weeks of pimping Damages I've managed to miss the last episode and a half. It's not the kind of show you can just have on while you do other stuff and I haven't had the time for it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 17, 2007, 01:43:07 PM
Anyone else enjoying Damages as much as I am?  Loving Danson and Glen Close.  Great to see a show where you can't tell the good guys from the bad guys.

Yeah, I look forward to watching it.  Compelling.

Right now it's Damages and Flight of the Concords.  Big Love had what I thought was a terrific episode 2 or 3 back - it really sucked me in.  Rescue Me is another favorite, although weaker this season, I think. 

The Shield is my most-looking-forward-to series.  I swear, it's the best series I've ever seen on TV, and it keeps getting better and better.

I don't love Flight of the Concords.  Just not my style of humor.  I occassionaly watch it and Entourage,  but neither is really compelling.

Entourage has been pretty uneven,  though they do make the most of the relaxed HBO atmosphere.  The storylines just aren't great,  even though Drama and Ari can both be entertaining as hell.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: trotski on August 17, 2007, 02:47:55 PM
Love Flight of the Conchords, and Entourage.  Although I do agree that Entourage is pretty uneven, writing-wise. I've got a bunch of Damages waiting to watch, keep forgetting I have them Tivo'd.

Has anyone watched 'Live From Abbey Road' on Sundance? This is a great show. Last night the artists were The Kooks (meh), Wynton Marsalis, and Muse.  Muse blew my fucking mind.  I love their albums, but had never seen them live -- awesome. Any music fans should check this show out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 19, 2007, 10:49:56 AM
The 2nd episode of Flash Gordon was even worse than the first. I'm only going to give this crappy show one more go, and only because the previews for next episode showed Flash on Mongo where the story should be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 19, 2007, 04:56:51 PM
Why do you continue to punish yourself with things you do not enjoy?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 19, 2007, 09:11:54 PM
The 2nd episode of Flash Gordon was even worse than the first. I'm only going to give this crappy show one more go, and only because the previews for next episode showed Flash on Mongo where the story should be.
WHAT? THE HEART FELT DRAMA OF MING AND DAUGHTER DOESN'T MOVE YOU?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on August 20, 2007, 12:22:16 AM
If it's "Things you don't Enjoy" you're looking for, allow me to recommend Torchwood. It's a spin-off from the new Doctor Who series on BBC featuring Captain Jack from season 1. Ironwood warned me that it was awful but I couldn't fully appreciate just how awful awful could be until I downloaded it from a torrent site and watched the first few episodes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 20, 2007, 07:12:07 AM
Oh ho, thanks for the warning.  The wife asked me what was up with the Captain Jack show.  I think I should tell her it was canned.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 20, 2007, 09:16:48 AM
Why do you continue to punish yourself with things you do not enjoy?

Because there is an insatiable need inside me to find out just how bad the shit can get. And it's Flash Gordon. Somewhere, deep in the subcockles of my blackened, jaded heart is the glimmer of hope that they can pull this stinker out of the shitpile and bring it up to at least Dresden Files quality, because it is Flash Gordon and even Uwe Boll shouldn't be able to fuck up the goodness that is Flash Gordon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 20, 2007, 11:15:27 AM
I WARNED YOU !!  I TOLE YOU !!!

DO NOT LOOK AT TORCHWOOD !  AVOID THE GIMLET STARE !!!!

BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH.


And whatnot.

Seriously, if you're going to watch Torchwood, you're in for some extreme pain.  It's fucking awful.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 20, 2007, 04:59:29 PM
I can't imagine anything being as bad as Painkiller Jane. It's unpossible.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on August 20, 2007, 05:51:47 PM
You've never seen an Uwe Boll movie?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on August 20, 2007, 06:22:20 PM
Painkiller Jane and Flash Gordon were pretty bad but, then, I don't think I actually have ever seen a Uwe Boll film.  I think I almost watched "Alone in the Dark" but Righ knew better and read me some reviews first so I didn't bother.  If I remember, the reviews were about the worst I'd ever heard.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 20, 2007, 08:41:35 PM
I can't imagine anything being as bad as Painkiller Jane. It's unpossible.


Umm.  Painkiller Jane and Flash aren't that bad.  They're unwatchably boring,  but not bad.  Black Scorpion,  which was on a few years ago,  made my eyes bleed. That was bad.

It was incredibly campy, bad superhero stuff.... with awful fight scenes, a plot you could drive cars through, terrible actors, and Adam fucking West hamming it up as a villain who,  no shit, got his super powers from toxic waste.

It was if someone took Family Guy and tried to make a serious low budget drama-action series out of it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on August 23, 2007, 07:47:12 AM
I just bought South Park season ten and it has a 14 day WoW trial disc inside it :-).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xerapis on August 23, 2007, 07:48:55 PM
I liked Torchwood.  I even bought Jack's coat from an UK military surplus site.

SO :P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: pants on August 23, 2007, 08:03:23 PM
I watched the first episode of Torchwood - and thought it was ok except for the whole 'WE'RE IN WALES!  YES, WALES!  NOT LONDON, CARDIFF.  ITS IN WALES!  ALL THE PEOPLE ARE WELSH!  WELSH PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE TOO'.  I was expecting a bloody men's choir to start singing the end credits or something.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on August 24, 2007, 05:43:11 AM
I watched the first episode of Torchwood - and thought it was ok except for the whole 'WE'RE IN WALES!  YES, WALES!  NOT LONDON, CARDIFF.  ITS IN WALES!  ALL THE PEOPLE ARE WELSH!  WELSH PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE TOO'.  I was expecting a bloody men's choir to start singing the end credits or something.

Cymru am byth!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 24, 2007, 05:53:25 AM
I liked Torchwood.  I even bought Jack's coat from an UK military surplus site.

SO :P

So what ?

Are you trying to prove the existance of mentally damaged people ?  I'm aware they exist.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 24, 2007, 11:13:23 AM
I watched the first episode of Torchwood - and thought it was ok except for the whole 'WE'RE IN WALES!  YES, WALES!  NOT LONDON, CARDIFF.  ITS IN WALES!  ALL THE PEOPLE ARE WELSH!  WELSH PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE TOO'.  I was expecting a bloody men's choir to start singing the end credits or something.

Rather like the new Doctor Who.  What's the deal with Cardiff?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 24, 2007, 11:31:15 AM
I really felt John from Cincinatti was unbearable. I watched the first episode and, oh my god the dialogue. Jesus. Bad.

Also, THE OCEAN WASN'T LOUD ENOUGH. DO WE HAVE TO BE REMINDED WE'RE NEAR WATER EVERY SECOND OF THE GODDAMN EPISODE?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 27, 2007, 09:59:50 AM
I'm definitely done with Flash Gordon. They can't even make a trip to Mongo interesting, or a dryhumping scene with Aura and Flash in any way tittilating. Aura is just such a terrible, terrible actress. The goddamn bounty hunter is more interesting than the entire cast, and I hated her character's introduction. The show is just so bland and uninspired, it doesn't attempt to be anything but a dead fish.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 27, 2007, 10:07:44 AM
Ya, it looks like they have brought over their Saturday Night "cheap chum" to Fridays.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 27, 2007, 10:11:11 AM
I really felt John from Cincinatti was unbearable. I watched the first episode and, oh my god the dialogue. Jesus. Bad.

Also, THE OCEAN WASN'T LOUD ENOUGH. DO WE HAVE TO BE REMINDED WE'RE NEAR WATER EVERY SECOND OF THE GODDAMN EPISODE?

Hold up! You dislike the dialog in J.F.C, but enjoy it in Disgaea 2? *shutters*

I completely understand how we disagreed about that title now.

I think the differences between us are now hard codded. lol.

Andy way, continue with thread. I currently do not watch TV, Through various means, i watch shows in DvD form, IF i like them. And no commercials are a dream (for non HBO type shows). So i am getting recommendations from this thread.  :thumbs_up:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 27, 2007, 10:43:39 AM
Watched the first two episodes of Californication on Showtime.  It is funny at times, and Duchovny is good in the role.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 27, 2007, 11:06:38 AM
Watched the first two episodes of Californication on Showtime.  It is funny at times, and Duchovny is good in the role.

The mini first episode was kinda funny, a dark sexual comedy, if you will. I'm guessing your saying the rest of the series is good?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on August 27, 2007, 11:27:23 AM
Uhh, do you read posts at all or just say whatever is on your mind?


As for JFC, the show deserved to be canned.  It needed to be canceled to teach Milch a fucking lesson.  That stupid cocksucker needs to jump off his Shakespearean dialog gimmick. It worked in Deadwood for a number of reasons.  First, how the fuck do we know what people sounded like back then?  Also, the actors on Deadwood were real actors (and they had Al).  Granted there's some crossover with JFC and some good additions (Luis Guzman), but some of the poorer actors (Kai, Shawn, hairlip) made it just sound stupid.  Hell, that dialog just sounds stupid in a modern context.  Say what you mean, you stupid assholes and quit spilling your guts to no one in particular every time the fancy strikes you.  Saying "yes" or "maybe" doesn't need to be a 8 sentence paragraph.

If this post were written by David Milch, I'd be saying all of this to a parrot or a perhaps a stapler if it had enough emotional meaning. 

Also the pacing was again, horrible.  Milch has a tendency, due to the verbal diarrhea, to have absolutely nothing happen in an episode.  Yah, that's a good way to get people hooked to your show, have nothing happen and have no one understand what anyone's saying.  AND HAVE IT BE ABOUT SURFING. Have everyone in the show be equally unlikeable except for characters that are just unintelligible. I guess he thought since Deadwood was such a critical darling, he could meander his way through a season and survive.  Ask Tim Minnear or Joss Whedon about how well that works out and their shows didn't have near the pacing problems or the other quality issues that plagued this show.

I thought the show was interesting and had some potential, but I expected this cancellation like I expected Monday to come after Sunday.  I ponder, Slinky on my desk, was it justified?  Was there some sort of mystical gathering of the moons that made it so?  Do you will it, Slinky?  Are you some how bending these events to your will or are you being bent to theirs? Oh no, slipped into Milch-land for a second. 

While this show was moderately intriguing for a while, I'm pissed off with HBO for wasting my time with it.

At least Big Love kicked ass this year, even if Bill Hendrickson is about as likeable as a pedophile.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 27, 2007, 11:50:47 AM
Uhh, do you read posts at all or just say whatever is on your mind?

Little of both, but i asked, just because someone fits the role, doesn't make the show as a while, good. Besides, its all opinions in this thread. I enjoyed the first (short) episode, but it really could go any direction after that, so i asked. That, and i watch everything like that on DvD or otherwise, and pay little attention to when it came out and how many episodes it has.. I watched the entire Lost series up to its last episode that way... Sometimes 3 a night..depending..good stuff to watch it that way.

As for JFC, the show deserved to be canned.  It needed to be canceled to teach Milch a fucking lesson.  That stupid cocksucker needs to jump off his Shakespearean dialog gimmick. It worked in Deadwood for a number of reasons.  First, how the fuck do we know what people sounded like back then?  Also, the actors on Deadwood were real actors (and they had Al).  Granted there's some crossover with JFC and some good additions (Luis Guzman), but some of the poorer actors (Kai, Shawn, hairlip) made it just sound stupid.  Hell, that dialog just sounds stupid in a modern context.  Say what you mean, you stupid assholes and quit spilling your guts to no one in particular every time the fancy strikes you.  Saying "yes" or "maybe" doesn't need to be a 8 sentence paragraph.

If this post were written by David Milch, I'd be saying all of this to a parrot or a perhaps a stapler if it had enough emotional meaning. 

Also the pacing was again, horrible.  Milch has a tendency, due to the verbal diarrhea, to have absolutely nothing happen in an episode.  Yah, that's a good way to get people hooked to your show, have nothing happen and have no one understand what anyone's saying.  AND HAVE IT BE ABOUT SURFING. Have everyone in the show be equally unlikeable except for characters that are just unintelligible. I guess he thought since Deadwood was such a critical darling, he could meander his way through a season and survive.  Ask Tim Minnear or Joss Whedon about how well that works out and their shows didn't have near the pacing problems or the other quality issues that plagued this show.

I thought the show was interesting and had some potential, but I expected this cancellation like I expected Monday to come after Sunday.  I ponder, Slinky on my desk, was it justified?  Was there some sort of mystical gathering of the moons that made it so?  Do you will it, Slinky?  Are you some how bending these events to your will or are you being bent to theirs? Oh no, slipped into Milch-land for a second. 

While this show was moderately intriguing for a while, I'm pissed off with HBO for wasting my time with it.

At least Big Love kicked ass this year, even if Bill Hendrickson is about as likeable as a pedophile.

I don't agree with allot of that. Best show ever? maybe not...good, different, odd, and entertaining would be how i describe it. I disliked big love. Weeds was ,however, kinda cool, and to short lived. I do wonder if Shawn is just that way, or if thats how the character was written, so i do find him kind of odd, so i guess i agree there, unless thats just the way the character is..

EDITS: Spelling/grammer


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 27, 2007, 08:25:12 PM
Quote
but some of the poorer actors (Kai,

Just FYI, but Keala Kennelly (i.e. "Kai") isn't an actor. She is a world class surfer. I actually thought she was decent in the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on August 28, 2007, 11:41:46 AM
Quote
but some of the poorer actors (Kai,

Just FYI, but Keala Kennelly (i.e. "Kai") isn't an actor. She is a world class surfer. I actually thought she was decent in the show.

I thought she was quite good considering she's not an actor.  Would have loved to see her surf more, though.

I don't think the show suffered from the acting or the writing so much as from the pacing, as stated above.  Watching episodes and not knowing what the fuck is going on is ok for a week or two but by the end of the season, there should be more answers than questions.  Lost is barely, minimally competent in this regard.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 28, 2007, 12:51:28 PM
Watched the first two episodes of Californication on Showtime.  It is funny at times, and Duchovny is good in the role.

The mini first episode was kinda funny, a dark sexual comedy, if you will. I'm guessing your saying the rest of the series is good?

Not really, just saying if you have an hour to spend on TV, this is better than a lot of the shit you might watch.  I have only watched the pilot and the second, and I can see where it is going already.  This one will hinge on the comedy, which it started off well with, and Duchovny's character.  Which, really, is the core of the jokes.  Great?  Not really.  Good?  Sure.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 29, 2007, 05:53:23 AM
That's a super hot Not-16-Year-Old.

I'll like this show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on August 29, 2007, 06:35:24 AM
That's a super hot Not-16-Year-Old.

I'll like this show.

What show?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 29, 2007, 06:57:35 AM
That's a super hot Not-16-Year-Old.

I'll like this show.

What show?
Californication.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on August 29, 2007, 08:05:45 AM
Ah, yes, I failed to mention the quantity of titties in Californication.  That 16-year-old is more like 26.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 30, 2007, 07:04:51 AM
Ah, yes, I failed to mention the quantity of titties in Californication.  That 16-year-old is more like 26.

She's 20. And super hot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 30, 2007, 08:48:42 AM
That's a super hot Not-16-Year-Old.

I'll like this show.


Would you enjoy the punches? lol.


(I like how he flinches every time she comes in the room, lol)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 30, 2007, 09:32:37 AM
Would you enjoy the punches? lol.

From her? Yes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 30, 2007, 09:42:59 AM
Would you enjoy the punches? lol.

From her? Yes.

Heh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 30, 2007, 04:51:10 PM
Would you enjoy the punches? lol.

From her? Yes.

"The spirit is willing,  but the flesh is bruised and spongy" --Zap Branigan


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 30, 2007, 06:54:55 PM
That was a great episode. Especially the alternate smiling/frowning regarding death by snoo snoo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 30, 2007, 08:38:59 PM
Don't forget about the basketball fundamentals.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on August 30, 2007, 09:30:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYrnG-6uV94


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on August 31, 2007, 04:24:02 AM
She's not that hot. Looks like someone raked her face when she was still a toddler.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on August 31, 2007, 04:38:57 AM
Huh?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on August 31, 2007, 04:48:02 AM
That rake accident probably happened during the shooting of "The Nanny".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on August 31, 2007, 10:39:09 AM
I was surprised to learn today that, in one of the stranger casting choices I've seen, Nathan Fillion will be joining the regular series cast of Desperate Housewives as a gynecologist.  Will this lead to the cancellation of the show, or does Fillion's particular Kiss of Death only apply to shows on FOX?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on August 31, 2007, 04:09:27 PM
Don't forget about the basketball fundamentals.

Ha ha good call.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on August 31, 2007, 04:46:10 PM
I was surprised to learn today that, in one of the stranger casting choices I've seen, Nathan Fillion will be joining the regular series cast of Desperate Housewives as a gynecologist.  Will this lead to the cancellation of the show, or does Fillion's particular Kiss of Death only apply to shows on FOX?
Mostly just FOX.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 03, 2007, 09:30:14 PM
FoTC was freaking hilarious this week if you get the dancing reference.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 04, 2007, 08:48:55 AM
I dunno, I'm not real big on fiction most of the time. Watching the new lobstering show on Discovery, LOBSTAH WAHS! My family is mostly lobsterers in Maine, so it's an interesting show as it's what I would be doing if WW2 hadn't displaced my grandfather.

Misering our last few Planet Earth HD episodes like they are video gold..."NO, we can't watch two in a row. Maybe we can watch another one next week." Only two left, forests and caves. Best tv in evar, but they only have time to touch on subjects that could be entire shows themselves.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on September 04, 2007, 12:47:09 PM
Those are the two best ones, IMO.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 11, 2007, 10:02:31 PM
My review of the Sarah Connor Chronicles First Episode.

AWESOME.

I'D FUCK A ROBOT.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on September 11, 2007, 10:16:46 PM
I'D FUCK A ROBOT.
You'd fuck a splintery hole.

I don't trust you when it comes to TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 12, 2007, 01:02:12 AM
I'D FUCK A ROBOT.
You'd fuck a splintery hole.

I don't trust you when it comes to TV.
(http://forums.f13.net/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=2977;type=avatar)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on September 12, 2007, 06:43:46 AM
My review of the Sarah Connor Chronicles First Episode.

AWESOME.

I'D FUCK A ROBOT.

When is this show starting? I can't seem to find any information on it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 12, 2007, 09:23:27 AM
You say that like it's a bad thing.

EDIT: Oh, and I saw the preview for this week's Flash Gordon, now with Hawkmen.

Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes? If lack of wings doesn't kill that series, nothing will.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on September 12, 2007, 09:48:54 AM
You say that like it's a bad thing.

EDIT: Oh, and I saw the preview for this week's Flash Gordon, now with Hawkmen.

Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes? If lack of wings doesn't kill that series, nothing will.
When I turn to Sci-Fi, I actually cover my eyes lest I see some sort of "Flash Gordon" commercial. I think it kills brain cells. This makes watching "Eureka" hard, I admit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on September 18, 2007, 09:13:27 AM
I just watched the preview episodes of a couple of new NBC series on Cox On-demand.

Bionic Woman was ok. It's got Miguel Ferra the dick corporate guy from the first Robocop movie. He's playing basically the evil government guy here. Chief Tyrol was in the first episode briefly but I'm not sure why, it seems to tie into a storyline involving the Bionic Woman's boyfriend's evil father. So far, it's interesting but could go either way.

I also watched Chuck. I liked it alot. The hot blond parading around in her bra and panties while preparing for a "date" with Chuck helped alot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on September 18, 2007, 09:16:34 AM
Prison Break had the worst, most illogical product placement EVER yesterday. Did anyone else catch it?  More later.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2007, 09:21:21 AM
Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes?

Like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pumaman)?

Also: It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 18, 2007, 09:23:58 AM
Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes?

Like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pumaman)?

Yep, pretty much like that.

Quote
Also: It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia

That show continues to bring the kind of funny that makes you cringe. You don't want to laugh at it but you just can't help it. The football tryouts episode was hysterical.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 18, 2007, 09:54:48 AM
Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes?

Like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pumaman)?

Oh fuck me.  Is that episode of Mystery Science Theater available on DVD?  I was cracking up just reading the wikipedia entry.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2007, 10:22:51 AM
Not sure.  I have watched most of those movies without the benefit of Joel or Mike.  This includes Puma Man, Santa Claus Conquers the Martians, and many others which have rotted the memory centers in which they once resided.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stu on September 18, 2007, 11:03:33 AM
This is pretty funny if you're a fan of The Office:

http://blog.nbc.com/CreedThoughts/ (http://blog.nbc.com/CreedThoughts/)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 18, 2007, 12:07:16 PM
Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes?

Like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pumaman)?

Oh fuck me.  Is that episode of Mystery Science Theater available on DVD?  I was cracking up just reading the wikipedia entry.

I don't know, but I taped it years ago and it is one of my all-time favorite MST3Ks.  Just the intro where Tom pronounces Thepumaman as one word is enough to crack me up.  Be warned, the Thepumaman theme-song is insidious and will stick in your head for days afterward.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 18, 2007, 09:04:53 PM
Did I mention the fucking Hawkmen don't even have wings, just shitty looking capes?

Like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pumaman)?

Oh fuck me.  Is that episode of Mystery Science Theater available on DVD?  I was cracking up just reading the wikipedia entry.

It hasn't been released as part of the DVD collections.

I've been trying to PM you, but I'm not sure it is working. I have that episode as an .avi. I can put it on a disk and mail it to you if you want.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 20, 2007, 06:24:11 AM
Well, I'd like to thank American TV producers for fucking up another idea. Watched Ramsey's (Etreme Home) Kitchen (Makeover) Nightmares. Talk about not getting the fucking concept.

- A show about restaurants and cooking had approximately 30 seconds of cooking footage.
- the point of the show is to help improve the running of a business, not fucking buying them a new kitchen
- I know, instead of cooking, lets inlude ten minutes of canned shots of people wiping counters and organizing menus! Don't want Americans to think they are watching show about food!
- Best of all, after 48 minutes of the idiot doing his best Tony Soprano, we get a two minute "I have seen the light and will mend my ways" And then they all played on a jumpy castle! Fuckin 'ell.
- Finally, they cut out the key payoff of the original show, Ramsey coming back a month later to see how badly they've fucked everything up.

That was really painful to watch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 20, 2007, 06:37:57 AM
Time did pass in that episode beyond just that one week. E.g. there was no way they could've organized that community event during that week, and they showed that thing at the end about how Peter had transformed himself into a little angel after Gordon was gone. I agree that the show was weak. I like Gordon, though, (Bonnie should've won!), so I'll watch a couple more and see how it goes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 06:56:47 AM
(Bonnie should've won!)

LIES.  No one in that group was worth a damn.  Maybe Waffle House chick with a couple of years more experience.

But yeah, Kitchen Nightmares was a disappointment.  Even Hell's Kitchen irks me because it isn't so much about cooking as it is about showing Ramsey having a meltdown.  "DONKEY!!"  Hell's Kitchen has evolved into a drinking game at my house.  Or is that 'devolved.'

And how much of that was staged?  The guy was obviously doing his best coked up Ralph Cifferetto impression, and it seemed like he told his friends to "drop by" while the cameras were rolling.  I'll bet they met up afterwards and high-fived on the awseome fist fight that they almost, kinda, sorta, maybe, in-a-way insinuated that they could have, should have, would have had if they hadn't been restrained.

But it is nice to humanize Ramsey by comparison.  For that it was worth watching. 

Fox has adopted a style of editing where they take ten hours of footage and show you an hour's worth of half second cut aways with trumpet flares over the dialogue.  Its tiresome.  It worked for one season of The Apprentice and now it's industry standard. 


Another five days until House?  Sheesh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 20, 2007, 07:07:04 AM
(Bonnie should've won!)
LIES.  No one in that group was worth a damn.  Maybe Waffle House chick with a couple of years more experience.
I didn't say she was good cook.. :-D (Though she did do quite well in the challenges)



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 07:16:10 AM
I didn't say she was good cook.. :-D (Though she did do quite well in the challenges)

So you're using the same criteria that Ramsey uses to judge.  /wink

But, yes, I would concede that she was more familiar with the -type- of cooking that he would expect in his kitchen.  Waffle House chick was just a better cook; it was obvious she had been on a line for some time. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 20, 2007, 07:19:18 AM
Caught some of that Kitchen Nightmares show, it was pretty funny. The host was no supernanny, she'd have laid out in no uncertain words how Peter was fucking over his entire family rather than try to be subtle about it. I stopped watching and recorded it to watch with the fiancee because we know a guy exactly like Peter irl, so it'll be fun to watch. That restaurant could've been a multi-episode deal, they had a lot of different angles to work.  The host also swore way too much, the bleeping got obnoxious (along with the little mouth blur).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on September 20, 2007, 07:25:59 AM
I forgot to watch that and I really wanted to, I loved the British series.  Damn.

It's a shame that they're bleeping him, they should put it on late enough that they don't have to do that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 07:36:37 AM
The host also swore way too much, the bleeping got obnoxious (along with the little mouth blur).

I'm almost tempted to just wait for the dvds in hopes that it isn't censored.  But asking Gordon Ramsey to refrain from discharging expletives is akin to, crap I hate this phrase, herding cats.  Watch Hell's Kitchen next season to see him in his element.  The cursing is more in context when there's a donkey screwing up his line.

I loved the British series.

Funny how they have the best television.  Limey bastards.  The Office, Extras, [insert] Idol, Ramsey's shows, even the silly Nanny stuff has been ported here.  At least for House they just skipped the British version and hired a British actor.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 20, 2007, 07:37:09 AM
Caught some of that Kitchen Nightmares show, it was pretty funny. The host was no supernanny, she'd have laid out in no uncertain words how Peter was fucking over his entire family rather than try to be subtle about it. I stopped watching and recorded it to watch with the fiancee because we know a guy exactly like Peter irl, so it'll be fun to watch. That restaurant could've been a multi-episode deal, they had a lot of different angles to work.  The host also swore way too much, the bleeping got obnoxious (along with the little mouth blur).

The original British version was actually a show about the restaurant business, not this weak shit Fox has thrown at us. I'll stick to my reruns of the original on Food Network. Oh, and the host is Gordon Ramsey, what the fuck were you expecting to come out of his mouth? It's much less annoying on Cable where they don't bleep and blur it. (Or stage 90% of it like Fox did)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 20, 2007, 07:38:49 AM
You people have pretty low standards for TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 07:40:13 AM
You people have pretty low standards for TV.

Are their higher standards for TV? 

I missed that memo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on September 20, 2007, 07:40:55 AM
Just a warning that if you buy the Family Guy DVD set you are actually only getting half of the season, they split it again.  I was fine with it last time because it allowed them to get the season/volume numbers in sync again but now they're just trying to bilk us.  If it works it will set a very bad precedent and will start happening more and more.  It's like they want me to start bittorrenting TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 20, 2007, 07:41:22 AM
Any of you get to see the Canadian version of Food Network down there? One show I've gotten hooked on is Restaurant Makeover. Its set in Toronto, and is basically an Executive Chef and a designer redoing failing restaurants. They match the owner's investment dollor to dollar, and then gut the place and rebuild it. Meanwhile the chef tries to teach the resident cook how to do more than boil water.

The star of the show though is Igor the construction crew chief.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 20, 2007, 07:47:06 AM
You people have pretty low standards for TV.
The Fall season doesn't start until next week so for this week there's only a handful of new episodes/premieres from shows getting an early start.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 08:04:30 AM
You people have pretty low standards for TV.
The Fall season doesn't start until next week so for this week there's only a handful of new episodes/premieres from shows getting an early start.

And let's be honest: TV is a distraction.  I didn't watch Kitchen Nightmares expecting high drama.  It was so-so at best, and I'm not going to pretend that I hated it just to convince some internet asshat that I have high standards.  The same goes for K-Ville.  It was no NYPD Blue; it was so-so at best and it will (maybe) get a little better.  Good shows are few and far between and usually take time to mature.  Go watch the first season of Seinfeld and tell me that it would make it past episode one by today's standards.

When shows like Deadwood and Huff are given short runs on pay networks, my trust in executives to make their decisions based on 'standards' goes out the window.  They see million-dollar per episode price tags.  They will continue to pump out easy-to-film 'reality' crap rather than pay for good scripts and direction.

But I didn't think that anyone really wanted to rehash that tired old argument.  I thought that it was understood that we are in the reality TV decade and we had best suck it up in the meantime.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 20, 2007, 08:39:07 AM
I wasn't rehashing any arguments, just making a comment.  We all know how it works, as you said.

I think I'm more of a gadfly than an asshat.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 20, 2007, 08:46:46 AM
The only kitchen show I can tolerate is Top Chef. At least the contestants on that show can cook and Tom Collichio + the occasional Tony Bourdaine is better than anything else anyone can even offer.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 08:56:24 AM
I wasn't rehashing any arguments, just making a comment.  We all know how it works, as you said.

It came off as a bit Hyacinth Bucket.  "Ooooo Richard you'll never believe what the neighbors are watching..."  I'll be a bit touchy until I get my House fix next week.

Quote
I think I'm more of a gadfly than an asshat.

Internet Asshat is a term of endearment by now, isn't it?



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 20, 2007, 12:07:50 PM
Any of you get to see the Canadian version of Food Network down there? One show I've gotten hooked on is Restaurant Makeover. Its set in Toronto, and is basically an Executive Chef and a designer redoing failing restaurants. They match the owner's investment dollor to dollar, and then gut the place and rebuild it. Meanwhile the chef tries to teach the resident cook how to do more than boil water.

The star of the show though is Igor the construction crew chief.

They've shown that on the American Food Network. It's a decent watch.

Top Chef is definitely good fun TV, especially when Bourdain is on there savaging someone. Next Food Network Star was ok until I saw Top Chef, now it pales in comparison. It's such a show about image and warm fuzzies, while Top Chef is about food and assholes.

Fuck Gordon Ramsey in his tiny ass. I've never seen what makes me think I should give a shit about him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on September 20, 2007, 12:35:52 PM
Anyone catch the new softporn HBO show?  Tell Me You Love Me.  It stars a lot of people who you've seen in something or other.

It's terrible.  I wanted to like this show, but it's whinier than 30something was.  I didn't make it through the first episode.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 20, 2007, 12:43:27 PM
I wanted to like this show, but it's whinier than 30something was.

You have just guaranteed that I will avoid it at all costs.  Somehow, I had managed to completely block out thirtysomething until I read that post.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 20, 2007, 12:53:22 PM
Top Chef is far and away the best competetive cooking show as far as the whole reality tv thing goes.  Hell's Kitchen is fun to watch just because they hand Gordon Ramsey a bunch of idiots to run his restaurant.  Kitchen Nightmares BBC stlye > Fox style, but I still had fun watching it. 



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on September 20, 2007, 12:55:45 PM
I had the thrill of watching "Highlander: The Source".

It was super fucking awesome.  Better than the Matrix, Boondock Saints, and Firefly PUT TOGETHER.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on September 20, 2007, 02:25:19 PM
I had the thrill of watching "Highlander: The Source".

It was super fucking awesome.  Better than the Matrix, Boondock Saints, and Firefly PUT TOGETHER.
I think you're being sarcastic. However, it's on my Tivo because "What the hell, I plan to be drunk sometime this weekend". :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 20, 2007, 02:33:32 PM
Top Chef is far and away the best competetive cooking show as far as the whole reality tv thing goes. 

Ok, I've had about enough of this. It's time for Chairman Mark Dascascos to kick all of your asses.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 20, 2007, 02:51:28 PM
I had the thrill of watching "Highlander: The Source".

It was super fucking awesome.  Better than the Matrix, Boondock Saints, and Firefly PUT TOGETHER.
I think you're being sarcastic. However, it's on my Tivo because "What the hell, I plan to be drunk sometime this weekend". :)

There's no sarcasm there. Methos is probably one of the best characters ever conceived. In all likelihood, even if it's total shit, it's better than all 3 of those things put together. Of course poopy is better than whatever the child of Matrix and Firefly would be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 20, 2007, 02:54:02 PM
Top Chef is far and away the best competetive cooking show as far as the whole reality tv thing goes.  Hell's Kitchen is fun to watch just because they hand Gordon Ramsey a bunch of idiots to run his restaurant.  Kitchen Nightmares BBC stlye > Fox style, but I still had fun watching it. 

I kind of got into Top Chef for a few episodes.  Then got completely turned off by the judges.  They seem to be waaaaay overcritical.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 20, 2007, 02:56:46 PM
OVER CRITICAL? YOU POST ON F13.

Also, most of those people are SUCCESSFUL CHEFS. Not the fucking moron troglodyte retards you see on Hell's Kitchen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on September 20, 2007, 02:57:33 PM
I had the thrill of watching "Highlander: The Source".

It was super fucking awesome.  Better than the Matrix, Boondock Saints, and Firefly PUT TOGETHER.
I think you're being sarcastic. However, it's on my Tivo because "What the hell, I plan to be drunk sometime this weekend". :)

I certainly think he is.  It was god awful, imo.  I stopped watching about 30-45 mins in.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 20, 2007, 03:01:21 PM
Top Chef is far and away the best competetive cooking show as far as the whole reality tv thing goes. 

Ok, I've had about enough of this. It's time for Chairman Mark Dascascos to kick all of your asses.

Lol.. Japanese Iron Chef and the new Iron Chef are fun to watch.. but they aren't in the same build as say Top Chef and Hell's Kitchen.  I like Iron Chef as a matter of fact it's what got me into watching cooking shows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 20, 2007, 03:04:07 PM
OVER CRITICAL? YOU POST ON F13.

Also, most of those people are SUCCESSFUL CHEFS. Not the fucking moron troglodyte retards you see on Hell's Kitchen.

They were Waterthread overcritical,  not F13 critical.

It just felt like some of the judges criticism was for the sole purpose of creating teh drama for reality tv viewing pleasure in seeing people freak out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 20, 2007, 03:08:37 PM
OVER CRITICAL? YOU POST ON F13.

Also, most of those people are SUCCESSFUL CHEFS. Not the fucking moron troglodyte retards you see on Hell's Kitchen.

They were Waterthread overcritical,  not F13 critical.

It just felt like some of the judges criticism was for the sole purpose of creating teh drama for reality tv viewing pleasure in seeing people freak out.

Well, I'm sorry you think that, because it's entirely wrong. These are restaurant/business owners and executive chefs as contestants. Colicchio and co have not changed their tune even once since the first episode of the first season. You COULD accuse them of a little drama when they picked Ilan to move forward last season. But Sam had a bad night, so it's a tough call. Anyway, no, they're not being overly critical. Sometimes they aren't critical enough. I'm sorry if you thought that brocolli looked good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on September 20, 2007, 05:34:23 PM
I was being sarcastic.  It is so god awful bad.  I mean, really, really, really bad.  And I love the Highlander universe.  Watched the show every damn day after school.

But the movie.

TOTAL SHIT.  I mean, TOTAL.

But ya, go watch, you'll see.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 20, 2007, 05:49:04 PM
OVER CRITICAL? YOU POST ON F13.

Also, most of those people are SUCCESSFUL CHEFS. Not the fucking moron troglodyte retards you see on Hell's Kitchen.

They were Waterthread overcritical,  not F13 critical.

It just felt like some of the judges criticism was for the sole purpose of creating teh drama for reality tv viewing pleasure in seeing people freak out.

Well, I'm sorry you think that, because it's entirely wrong. These are restaurant/business owners and executive chefs as contestants. Colicchio and co have not changed their tune even once since the first episode of the first season. You COULD accuse them of a little drama when they picked Ilan to move forward last season. But Sam had a bad night, so it's a tough call. Anyway, no, they're not being overly critical. Sometimes they aren't critical enough. I'm sorry if you thought that brocolli looked good.

The only times I think they are over critical was like with the last episode and Casey's Coq au vin.  Sure it wasn't a 'true' coq au vin but more of an interpretation of one.  The fact that Colicchio really made a big thing of that was kind of rediculous... mainly because where in the hell, in the US, are you going to find rooster meat or an older chicken that should be used in it.  It was more of a naming problem more then anything else and that probably cost her the win over Hung.  Sometimes they just nitpick a little too much.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 20, 2007, 07:29:10 PM
If you like Top Chef you really need to read Bourdaine's blog over on bravotv.com. He does one for every episode and they are all sorts of awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 20, 2007, 07:47:05 PM
Yeah I read his blog.. I've been a fan of Bourdain for a long time, ever since i saw his old TV show.  I watch his new one on the Travel Channel when i get a chance, but I tend to forget when it comes on.  He does tend to hate on alot of people though, especially if they work for the Food Network.  I saw him bash Rachel Ray on one of his newer shows and Sandra lee on a video I saw awhile back. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 21, 2007, 01:21:19 AM
OVER CRITICAL? YOU POST ON F13.

Also, most of those people are SUCCESSFUL CHEFS. Not the fucking moron troglodyte retards you see on Hell's Kitchen.

They were Waterthread overcritical,  not F13 critical.

It just felt like some of the judges criticism was for the sole purpose of creating teh drama for reality tv viewing pleasure in seeing people freak out.

Well, I'm sorry you think that, because it's entirely wrong. These are restaurant/business owners and executive chefs as contestants. Colicchio and co have not changed their tune even once since the first episode of the first season. You COULD accuse them of a little drama when they picked Ilan to move forward last season. But Sam had a bad night, so it's a tough call. Anyway, no, they're not being overly critical. Sometimes they aren't critical enough. I'm sorry if you thought that brocolli looked good.

The only times I think they are over critical was like with the last episode and Casey's Coq au vin.  Sure it wasn't a 'true' coq au vin but more of an interpretation of one.  The fact that Colicchio really made a big thing of that was kind of rediculous... mainly because where in the hell, in the US, are you going to find rooster meat or an older chicken that should be used in it.  It was more of a naming problem more then anything else and that probably cost her the win over Hung.  Sometimes they just nitpick a little too much.

I prefer Casey to Hung. But she's nowhere near as good of a cook. Hung is an egotistical prick. He's a bastard and a chauvinist, but he's a damn fine cook.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 21, 2007, 01:35:31 AM
OVER CRITICAL? YOU POST ON F13.

Also, most of those people are SUCCESSFUL CHEFS. Not the fucking moron troglodyte retards you see on Hell's Kitchen.

They were Waterthread overcritical,  not F13 critical.

It just felt like some of the judges criticism was for the sole purpose of creating teh drama for reality tv viewing pleasure in seeing people freak out.

Well, I'm sorry you think that, because it's entirely wrong. These are restaurant/business owners and executive chefs as contestants. Colicchio and co have not changed their tune even once since the first episode of the first season. You COULD accuse them of a little drama when they picked Ilan to move forward last season. But Sam had a bad night, so it's a tough call. Anyway, no, they're not being overly critical. Sometimes they aren't critical enough. I'm sorry if you thought that brocolli looked good.

The only times I think they are over critical was like with the last episode and Casey's Coq au vin.  Sure it wasn't a 'true' coq au vin but more of an interpretation of one.  The fact that Colicchio really made a big thing of that was kind of rediculous... mainly because where in the hell, in the US, are you going to find rooster meat or an older chicken that should be used in it.  It was more of a naming problem more then anything else and that probably cost her the win over Hung.  Sometimes they just nitpick a little too much.

I prefer Casey to Hung. But she's nowhere near as good of a cook. Hung is an egotistical prick. He's a bastard and a chauvinist, but he's a damn fine cook.

I think there's no doubt when it comes to technical ability that Hung outclasses everyone else.  I do think that Casey will beat him, simply cuz she's shown to have a better palett and pushes her cooking more.  I do have to admit, I still hate Marcell from season 2 more then Hung.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 21, 2007, 01:39:29 AM
No one is worse than Stephen. I wanted to punch him when he showed up this season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 21, 2007, 01:58:36 AM
Haha, ya and he's a Sommelier now, so that's jacked up his ego even more.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 21, 2007, 02:13:11 AM
He was a sommelier when the show came on. Like, before.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 21, 2007, 08:15:35 AM
It's time for Chairman Mark Dascascos to kick all of your asses.
So America, with an open heart and an empty stomach, I say unto you in the words of my uncle: Allez Cuisine!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 21, 2007, 08:17:31 AM
Stephen and Marcel should both be put in a blender turned on hi. Hung is an asshole, but I found Howie more of an asshole for most of the season than Hung. Hung will likely lose to Casey because he has had a tendency to phone it in when he doesn't have a lot of respect for the dish. I was surprised that Sarae hung around as long as she did. She seemed to have no fucking clue what she was doing most of the season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on September 21, 2007, 12:14:41 PM
Anyone catch the new softporn HBO show?  Tell Me You Love Me.  It stars a lot of people who you've seen in something or other.

It's terrible.  I wanted to like this show, but it's whinier than 30something was.  I didn't make it through the first episode.



I fast forwarded through it this morning to the interesting bits. Not sure if I will actually watch the entire show or not.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 21, 2007, 12:20:53 PM
He was a sommelier when the show came on. Like, before.

Ahh my bad, I didn't really see much of season 1, I just remember them saying he had just passed his sommelier tests or something this season when he showed up for the restaurant challenge.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on September 24, 2007, 10:00:34 AM
Internet Asshat is a term of endearment by now, isn't it?

When you capitalize it that way, I'm tempted to put it on a business card.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on September 24, 2007, 06:59:09 PM
Last night's hour-long Star Wars Family Guy...if you don't think it was the greatest thing you've ever seen, ever, YOU HATE JOY. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on September 24, 2007, 07:37:40 PM
Last night's hour-long Star Wars Family Guy...if you don't think it was the greatest thing you've ever seen, ever, YOU HATE JOY. 

The little back and forth between Chris and Peter at the end there was great, too.

"[Robot Chicken's Star Wars episode] doubled their viewership!"
"Oh so double what, 10 people?  That's 20 fans. Oooh."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 24, 2007, 08:51:39 PM
That was indeed fantastic. Not only the jokes (which were legion and had a very high "good" ratio), but the animation itself was really good. It's almost like they rotoscoped some scenes it was so close to the original.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on September 24, 2007, 10:24:17 PM
I was living out of a hotel for two weeks and only got like 10 channels, one of which was HBO, so I watched both eps of "Show Me You Love Me." It was pretty awful. Few of the characters were either likeable or hateable. And I'm tired of the whole "blah blah surbuban life is so terrible" cliche. There was nothing fun about it, or even interesting about it. The only character I could really even stand was the husband in the couple that were trying to conceive, only because he seemed like a normal person.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 25, 2007, 06:20:48 AM
That was indeed fantastic. Not only the jokes (which were legion and had a very high "good" ratio), but the animation itself was really good. It's almost like they rotoscoped some scenes it was so close to the original.

Would not shock me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 25, 2007, 06:37:42 AM
Watched the premier of Chuck last night. Enjoyed it. It had everything a great series needs:
- pointless hot chick getting dressed segments
- Angry Napolean complex Best Buy employee as a foil to the hero
- Jayne
- Jayne working at Best Buy
- It was Awesome!



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 25, 2007, 06:43:28 AM
Watched the premier of Chuck last night. Enjoyed it. It had everything a great series needs:
- pointless hot chick getting dressed segments
- Angry Napolean complex Best Buy employee as a foil to the hero
- Jayne
- Jayne working at Best Buy
- It was Awesome!

Glad to see I'm not the only one that tuned in to a show just because Adam Baldwin was in it.

CBC was showing the final 3 episodes of Dr. Who's third season last night,  almost opted for that instead.

Anyone been watching the new Ken Burns documentary, "The War"?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on September 25, 2007, 08:39:27 AM
Anyone been watching the new Ken Burns documentary, "The War"?
Recording it. i heard about it from his speech on cspan talking about the movie; the guy's a damned good orator.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 25, 2007, 08:39:56 AM
JAYNE IS IN CHUCK? AS A BEST BUY EMPLOYEE?

Oh hell yes. I Tivoed this but haven't caught it yet. I'm glad I did.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on September 25, 2007, 09:59:34 AM
Don't get too excited. The "Jayne as a Best Buy" employee stuff was all clips from next week's episode. :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on September 25, 2007, 01:31:22 PM
JAYNE IS IN CHUCK? AS A BEST BUY EMPLOYEE?

Oh hell yes. I Tivoed this but haven't caught it yet. I'm glad I did.

Jayne is an insane "shoot first" NSA guy undercover in Best Buy! My favorite moment in the pilot:

Chuck's ex-college room-mate who is a rogue CIA spy is running through a parking lot after some crazy fight sequences. BLAM! He drops dead from a gunshot.

Jayne in a deadpan voice: "Stop or I'll shot."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on September 25, 2007, 01:43:39 PM
Chuck's ex-college room-mate who is a rogue CIA spy
This part annoyed me, but I guess they are leaving vague for future plot hooks.

Pretty good for a first show.  I didn't realize it was Jayne until I read it here.

Quantum Leap 2.0, on the other hand, sucked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on September 25, 2007, 01:48:09 PM
Chuck's ex-college room-mate who is a rogue CIA spy
This part annoyed me, but I guess they are leaving vague for future plot hooks.

Pretty good for a first show.  I didn't realize it was Jayne until I read it here.


Me too. There wasn't so much as a hint as to why he went rogue. I'm pretty sure sending the stuff to Chuck was a total freak accident however. I also wonder how much "hot blond CIA chick" knows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 25, 2007, 06:17:09 PM
Prison Break is just as good as last the last 2 seasons so far. 
Heroes, same thing, starting off good.
Chuck.. had never heard of it but I caught it on NBC.com.. Awesome show!  I was surprised.
Journeyman... meh, forgettable.  Didn't really hook me at all.
Reaper.. has some possibilities.  I dug the pilot episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on September 25, 2007, 07:32:26 PM
Liked Reaper.  I have nothing in particular against Ray Wise's performance, but John Glover spoiled me in the Devil regard.  It showed hints that it could be the next Buffy. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 25, 2007, 07:48:14 PM
Chuck's ex-college room-mate who is a rogue CIA spy
This part annoyed me, but I guess they are leaving vague for future plot hooks.

Pretty good for a first show.  I didn't realize it was Jayne until I read it here.


Me too. There wasn't so much as a hint as to why he went rogue. I'm pretty sure sending the stuff to Chuck was a total freak accident however. I also wonder how much "hot blond CIA chick" knows.

I doubt it was an accident, he sent the email in the form of a game they used to play in college.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 26, 2007, 06:11:17 AM

I doubt it was an accident, he sent the email in the form of a game they used to play in college.

How to spot someone under 25 - he refered to Zork as "a game".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 26, 2007, 08:48:46 AM
Chuck was awesome. It started a bit slow, with some of the humor not quite hitting the hilarity it should have, but by the end I was hooked. That chick is teh hotness. I can't wait to see Adam Baldwin as a Buy More drone. That may be the best part of the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 26, 2007, 09:04:03 AM

I doubt it was an accident, he sent the email in the form of a game they used to play in college.

How to spot someone under 25 - he refered to Zork as "a game".

You'd be wrong if you mean me.   :wink:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on September 26, 2007, 01:31:23 PM
The Zork reference didn't ring true with me. Supposedly Chuck graduated university 5 years ago right? Someone graduating that recently certainly wouldn't have been playing Zork.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 26, 2007, 02:00:15 PM
I played a java version of the original mainframe version within the last five years.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 26, 2007, 02:01:27 PM
The Zork reference didn't ring true with me. Supposedly Chuck graduated university 5 years ago right? Someone graduating that recently certainly wouldn't have been playing Zork.

He and Bryce had programmed their own Zork knockoff,  not that they were playing the original game/s in college.  That sounds pretty college-ish,  at least for a Stanford engineering kid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on September 26, 2007, 03:13:03 PM
Ah OK that makes sense then.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 27, 2007, 06:06:30 AM
However, he stated that they programmed in on a TRS80. I guess a colledge kid might have one of those in his closet for nostalgia sake... If it was supposed to be a standard computer at the time, then he went to school in the late 80s/early 90s. None of the timeline really works.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 27, 2007, 06:28:11 AM
TRS80 was standard in the late 80s/early 90s? I was programming on those (writing my own zork-style adventures) in the early 80s. Mid-80s to early 90s I was on a C64 or dumb terminal (which I had also used in the 70s when I was a kid). In 93 even I could afford a 486.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on September 27, 2007, 06:45:17 AM
TRS80 was standard in the late 80s/early 90s? I was programming on those (writing my own zork-style adventures) in the early 80s. Mid-80s to early 90s I was on a C64 or dumb terminal (which I had also used in the 70s when I was a kid). In 93 even I could afford a 486.

Yes they were. In fact, our computer classes at my high school were on TRS80s and I graduated in 1990.

And yeah, I totally forgot about the zork thing. In my defense I watched the pilot two weeks ago on Cox On Demand. Ok, so now I'm more puzzled. Why Chuck?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Gutboy Barrelhouse on September 27, 2007, 07:23:44 AM
And the game they referenced was named "Chork" like everything else it was a play on words. And yes Yvonne Strahovski is teh hot. Some interesting facts about her:

Within days of her arrival in Los Angeles just a few short months ago, Strahovski immediately landed her role in NBC's "Chuck."

As her name suggests, she is of Polish descent and speaks fluent Polish.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on October 03, 2007, 01:10:39 AM
I'm in the goo!

American Dad > Family guy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on October 03, 2007, 06:18:01 AM
Did anyone watch the 2nd episode of Chuck? I enjoyed it and not just because of her Weinerlicious outfit. Though it helped. Alot. I think Adam Baldwin alone is enough to keep me watching it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on October 03, 2007, 07:13:58 AM
So, apparently Law and Order:  SVU had an episode dealing with a game called 'AY' or something, a game with online avatars and real estate and all that, and a sex predator who found his victim on it or something.  I couldn't watch more than 10 minutes of it as I found it flipping channels, as it was as silly as always.  Perhaps we can expect all sorts of attention on Second Life now. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 03, 2007, 07:57:29 AM
I like Chuck. It's the only new show so far that I like, though Life shows some promise.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: murdoc on October 03, 2007, 08:05:28 AM
I think Adam Baldwin alone is enough to keep me watching it.

I'm pretty 'meh' about Chuck. I really want to like it. I think it's a show written for my demographic, but the 2nd episode was really, really dumb.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 03, 2007, 08:42:20 AM
That's why I like it. It's a spoof and it's got that over-the-top campiness of Ugly Betty but more interesting subject matter (to me).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 03, 2007, 08:51:06 AM
BTW Pushing Daisies is premiering tonight which the critics are raving about.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 03, 2007, 12:03:27 PM
I'm digging Chuck. I'm not sure if it's got legs, since they've hinted that at some point, the spies will have to choose between offing Chuck or saving him and disobeying their superiors. But I'm enjoying it. The Morgan character bits are funny to me, as are Capt. Awesome.

And the chick is really hot. Like smoking hot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on October 03, 2007, 06:09:44 PM
I like Chuck but I wonder if I wouldn't like it more if it were half an hour.  It seems a bit too sitcom-y for an hour. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 03, 2007, 07:27:55 PM
Pushing Daisies was far, far better than I expected.   I like it and the narrative style but I can't quite recall what it reminds me of.

Of course, since I liked it I expect it to be gone in 3 weeks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 03, 2007, 08:42:14 PM
Pushing Daisies was far, far better than I expected.   I like it and the narrative style but I can't quite recall what it reminds me of.

Of course, since I liked it I expect it to be gone in 3 weeks.

Pushing Daisies was good.  Interesting characters, interesting narrative devices.  Even some pretty good use of color.  I'm actually enjoying Life. 

I'm not sure why I bother watching network shows though...  I always lose interest.  I have the attention span of a mayfly when it comes to TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 03, 2007, 08:44:28 PM
Late to the party, but Californication is my new favorite show. Duchovny was already the funniest guy on TV when the X-Files was around, and he wasn't even trying then.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 04, 2007, 05:39:43 AM
Pushing Daisies was far, far better than I expected.   I like it and the narrative style but I can't quite recall what it reminds me of.

Of course, since I liked it I expect it to be gone in 3 weeks.
Pushing Daisies was good.  Interesting characters, interesting narrative devices.  Even some pretty good use of color.  I'm actually enjoying Life. 
Yeah Pushing Daisies was interesting. It has a Burton-esque look to it and a rapid-fire dialog style somewhat akin to Gilmore Girls. I'm not sure how they are going to sustain the not touching thing for an entire season, though.

On unrelated notes the writing on The Bionic Woman really bites and it may be worth watching Dirty Sexy Money just for Donald Sutherland's performances.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 04, 2007, 09:49:46 AM
Pushing Daisies was far, far better than I expected.   I like it and the narrative style but I can't quite recall what it reminds me of.

Of course, since I liked it I expect it to be gone in 3 weeks.
Pushing Daisies was good.  Interesting characters, interesting narrative devices.  Even some pretty good use of color.  I'm actually enjoying Life. 
Yeah Pushing Daisies was interesting. It has a Burton-esque look to it and a rapid-fire dialog style somewhat akin to Gilmore Girls. I'm not sure how they are going to sustain the not touching thing for an entire season, though.

On unrelated notes the writing on The Bionic Woman really bites and it may be worth watching Dirty Sexy Money just for Donald Sutherland's performances.


Pushing Daisies gave me more of a "lighter Coen brothers" vibe then a Burton vibe. 

There's some good ingredients,  but Bionic Woman is getting fucked up in the execution or the editing.  The pacing feels off,  and the lead sucks.  It feels like the showrunner wants to emphasize character work,  but then someone else goes in and cuts the character development in favor of bad action scenes.  The pilot felt like someone had take a two-hour show and chopped it back to one hour.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 04, 2007, 06:10:27 PM
Three Sheets (on Mojo) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5xeB369NGE)

Anyone else watch this?




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on October 04, 2007, 06:17:21 PM
Three Sheets (on Mojo) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5xeB369NGE)

Anyone else watch this?




I hope he insured his liver.   :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 05, 2007, 04:31:41 AM
I can't find downloads for that show :( :( :( :(.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 05, 2007, 05:22:14 AM
Nope. Kind of a new channel too. You can get one episode on their website though : Link (http://mojohd.com/video/?sid=6) (Croatia)

Season 1 is already on DVD, for what it's worth.

Brussels was the funniest one I've seen so far..

(http://www.mojohd.com/mojoseries/threesheets/images/countries/belgium.jpg)

That dude on the right just stumbles on camera and tries to hijack the show for awhile. Zane wasn't too happy about it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 05, 2007, 05:55:05 AM
The show is HD only on tv and it's 1.33:1 on the DVD set?

No thanks. That's depressing as hell too. DVDs are only $22, heh. :(:(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 05, 2007, 07:16:07 AM
Three Sheets (on Mojo) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5xeB369NGE)

Anyone else watch this?
I love Zane, he's pretty funny. Drink when you see the monkey. Been watching that show for a while now. Mojo isn't technically new, one of the InHD channels had a mojo night of programming (with 3 sheets) and eventually changed over. Same thing happened with InHD2>MHD.

I'd like to see a more uncensored version of the show, there are definite nod and winks going on all the time (for instance in Jamaica when he does the hangover remedy).

There was a 'beer thief' in Paris, too, though he was moving in on Zane's champagne. My favorite moment was from that show, getting the uptight Parisian champagne snob to chug Cristal. Or maybe the Ireland episode when he's trying to pick up some gaelic sayings and one guy is speaking to him in english with such a heavy accent Zane thought he was speaking gaelic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Wolf on October 09, 2007, 10:03:28 AM
Anyone know what's going on with Boondocks? There's an episode on the net. Is it running again?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 09, 2007, 10:28:38 AM
Season 2 started last night.  Premier on Monday, replay on Saturday.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on October 10, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
I saw a replay of Life on Bravo or some other channel.  I liked it.  It has the guy who played Colonel Winters from Band of Brothers in it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on October 10, 2007, 09:35:03 PM
I saw a replay of Life on Bravo or some other channel.  I liked it.  It has the guy who played Colonel Winters from Band of Brothers in it.

Yeah, looks pretty good so far.  The dude's got a weird looking face, but so far the show is interesting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on October 11, 2007, 11:29:42 AM
South Park was awesome last night, especially if you hate Bono. 

And the graphic that kept showing "Emmy Award Winning Series" during parts of the show was classic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Furiously on October 11, 2007, 08:55:38 PM
I think Adam Baldwin alone is enough to keep me watching it.

I'm pretty 'meh' about Chuck. I really want to like it. I think it's a show written for my demographic, but the 2nd episode was really, really dumb.

When they imitated the 24 split screen action, I was laughing. They really need to reveal that Bryce picked him because he has a photographic memory.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 11, 2007, 09:25:06 PM
I'm not a fan of the SP eps that focus on real-life people. There have been a couple exceptions (J-Lo and Barbra for example) but mostly they seem more mean-spirited than funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on October 11, 2007, 09:31:16 PM
I'm not a fan of the SP eps that focus on real-life people. There have been a couple exceptions (J-Lo and Barbra for example) but mostly they seem more mean-spirited than funny.

I think that's the point though.  lol.

But, in general, they tend to pick on people that are full of themselves.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 11, 2007, 10:58:21 PM
That's true but the way they do it is not particularly humorous. For example I thought the Al Gore episode was awful, because it was just the same joke over and over. I didn't catch all of the Bono episode but it seemed like much the same. I like Gore and I don't know much about Bono but if you want to attack them that's fine, just make it funny. It seems like the plots for these episodes start as "Man, I hate Bono!" and then that's the entire episode.

I'll say the same about the Paris Hilton episode. She's a slut, ok...that by itself is not a half-hour of material.

On the other hand the J-Lo episode was awesome, because it had a variety of jokes and situations.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on October 14, 2007, 09:12:41 PM
Speaking of cartoons...

I think Frisky Dingo might be my favorite show on TV right now.  It's the perfect amount of batshit crazy to keep me watching and laughing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 15, 2007, 09:35:09 AM
That's true but the way they do it is not particularly humorous. For example I thought the Al Gore episode was awful, because it was just the same joke over and over. I didn't catch all of the Bono episode but it seemed like much the same. I like Gore and I don't know much about Bono but if you want to attack them that's fine, just make it funny. It seems like the plots for these episodes start as "Man, I hate Bono!" and then that's the entire episode.

I'll say the same about the Paris Hilton episode. She's a slut, ok...that by itself is not a half-hour of material.

On the other hand the J-Lo episode was awesome, because it had a variety of jokes and situations.

Part of the problem is that they are have gotten so absolutly full of themselves, that they need a show to poke the same kind of fun at them.  Listening to interviews with them now, as opposed to when they started, it becomes apparent they feel obligated to do the mean-spirited thing not because it's funny, but because their point of view is right and just and you're an idiot for not lapping it up.  They're enacting the same sin as the folks they mock.  It's amusing in a pathetic sort of way.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 15, 2007, 09:40:52 AM
I only recently discovered Versus on my cable box.

They've been playing the Rugby World Cup at odd times.  I love me some rugby on TV.  Caught the end of the US/South Africa match (South Africa was destroying the US team on the scoreboard,  but the play was alot closer),  and the last part of the France/England game (England pulls out a win in the final minutes).

Supposedly going to show the finals of the World Cup next Sunday.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on October 15, 2007, 10:42:59 AM
South Park was awesome last night, especially if you hate Bono. 

And the graphic that kept showing "Emmy Award Winning Series" during parts of the show was classic.

It was an entire episode wrapped around poop jokes. I mean really was it that funny? I didn't think so. It was funny how Bono came out of every room with flashing lights, cowboy hat, and firing off the finger guns going "Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!" However, it couldn't hold a whole show up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 15, 2007, 12:19:59 PM
I only recently discovered Versus on my cable box.

They've been playing the Rugby World Cup at odd times.  I love me some rugby on TV.  Caught the end of the US/South Africa match (South Africa was destroying the US team on the scoreboard,  but the play was alot closer),  and the last part of the France/England game (England pulls out a win in the final minutes).

Supposedly going to show the finals of the World Cup next Sunday.

If you have Directv, the Setanta Sports channel you can order ($14.99 a month) has about as much Rugby coverage as it does soccer coverage.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 15, 2007, 11:34:27 PM
Samantha Who? has potential. Christina Applegate was better than I expected her to be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 16, 2007, 03:25:52 AM
Newest words from Californication:

"Vaganus", "Remorstitude", "Lesbyterian"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on October 16, 2007, 02:53:46 PM
Christina Applegate was better than I expected her to be.

She was typecast by Married With Children and is a much better actress than given credit for being.
.
.
.

No House tonight.

Fucking baseball.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on October 16, 2007, 03:09:33 PM
Watching the promos for Bee Movie, who stole Seinfeld's funny?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 16, 2007, 03:10:28 PM
Watching the promos for Bee Movie, who stole Seinfeld's funny?

Children.

Also, House got booted for a sport no one gives a shit about anymore?

America has it's values all fucked up.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on October 16, 2007, 04:02:25 PM
Watching the promos for Bee Movie, who stole Seinfeld's funny?

Children.

Also, House got booted for a sport no one gives a shit about anymore?

America has it's values all fucked up.

Yeah, following the national past time? What a country!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 16, 2007, 05:33:25 PM
Quote
It was an entire episode wrapped around poop jokes. I mean really was it that funny? I didn't think so

Poop jokes on South Park. Whodathunkit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on October 16, 2007, 09:11:02 PM
Quote
It was an entire episode wrapped around poop jokes. I mean really was it that funny? I didn't think so

Poop jokes on South Park. Whodathunkit.

Yeah, one or two fine, but the two episodes I can think of that were completely about shit were beyond gross/stupid. This one and the one where Cartman learns to crap out of his mouth.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 16, 2007, 09:17:10 PM
Didn't see either Mr. Hanky episode eh?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on October 16, 2007, 09:37:09 PM
Didn't see either Mr. Hanky episode eh?

They were equally as stupid, but didn't gross me out. It was a talking turd, whoop-de-poo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 17, 2007, 05:46:22 PM
Yesterday I was stuck in a hotel and watched Weeds, Dexter and Californication. All were pretty good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on October 18, 2007, 08:45:59 AM
I really, really want to watch Dexter, but I refuse to support Showtime since they canceled Huff.

That was fucking stupid.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on October 18, 2007, 12:00:31 PM
I really, really want to watch Dexter, but I refuse to support Showtime since they canceled Huff.

That was fucking stupid.

Get the first season on DVD. If I refused to support networks for cancelling shows I liked I wouldn't watch any TV at all. Not that that's a bad thing mind you...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on October 18, 2007, 12:17:48 PM
I actually bought the DVDs based on word of mouth and subscribed to Showtime to watch the second season.  I started to like Weeds, and it was great to be able to see Bullsh!t as it aired.

But then, within a gnat's lifespan after Huff started winning awards, they canceled it with zero resolution to any of the plotlines.  Bastards.

My point is that Showtime is a pay network, and while I may disagree with Fox canceling a ton of shows with potential*, at least I'm not paying them directly. 

But, having been two years, I think I may have voiced my opinion about Huff.  Showtime has ignored it, and it's time for me to bite the bullet and resubscribe.

Maybe I should just encourage the rest of you bastards to go get the Season One Huff DVDs. (http://www.amazon.com/Huff-Complete-Ellen-S-Pressman/dp/B000E3L7F0/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-0589462-4786246?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1192734754&sr=8-1)


*Anchorwoman was my new favorite show within the first five minutes.  Zip it, Yegolev.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: raydeen on October 25, 2007, 10:27:54 PM
OK, I did a quick search of the forums and gathered that no one had talked about these shows yet.

My two favorite shows of the fall season:

Cavemen and Big Bang Theory.

OK. I'm prepared for a deluge of  :awesome_for_real: and general flaming, but these two shows have had me in tears. It took me a few episodes to get into Cavemen, but I immediately dug Big Bang Theory. Every sentence had a comedic twist on some arcane physics/astronomical/sci-fi thingy that I'm in to. And Cavemen is just too funny because it even exists. It hasn't quite met the standards of the commercials (and I guess I'm probably in the minority that finds them funny to no end), but it's getting better (or at least growing on me like a fungus).

I'm fully prepared to be called a fool. Or a tool. But these two shows have brought me back to common network TV. I'd given up on everything but FOX since Max Headroom and Twin Peaks were canceled  way back when.

I have a history of loving stupid shows. WKRP, Night Court, Married With Children....if that helps explain my psyche.

Give it to me with both barrels.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 25, 2007, 10:48:47 PM
It hasn't quite met the standards of the commercials

I can't flame you, I feel too sorry for you.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on October 26, 2007, 12:45:48 AM
Cavemen is a horrible, horrible show.

And this is from the guy who likes the new Flash Gordon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on October 26, 2007, 12:57:41 AM
Carpoolers on the other hand I find quite funny. It will be a pity if it goes down the toilet because its being bundled with Cavemen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: raydeen on October 26, 2007, 04:06:59 AM
Cavemen is a horrible, horrible show.

And this is from the guy who likes the new Flash Gordon.

Now, I couldn't get into Flash. And I generally like campy sci-fi. Andromeda was a fav of mine until the local affiliate started screwing with the schedule. Never did really see the last season because of that.

And as for feeling sorry for me, eh. I'm liking Cavemen if for no other reason that it's not shoving a laugh track down my throat. It's got that Malcolm in the Middle vibe where it's not telling you when to laugh. You do that on your own if you feel something is funny. And if you thought the first show was a turn off, give it another spin. I thought the first one was very weak, but I think it's getting funnier.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on October 26, 2007, 06:44:31 AM
Enjoy Cavemen while you can.

If you can call that enjoyment.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on October 26, 2007, 06:49:05 AM
I'd given up on everything but FOX since Max Headroom and Twin Peaks were canceled  way back when.


See, this tells me what I need to know. Fox is the worst about cancelling promising shows, followed closely by NBC.

As for what I'm watching, this season I'm watching more TV than I have in a decade:

Dexter
Chuck
Heroes
Reaper
Bionic Woman
Supernatural
Moonlight

I fully expect Moonlight to get canceled and because it's NBC I give Chuck a 50/50 chance which sucks because it is by far my favorite of the new shows. I think Reaper will hang on because the CW needs something to put on the air and I enjoy Reaper but Sam and Andy's courtship is already painful. As the devil said "Get the soul or get the girl. I don't care which but do something!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 26, 2007, 07:53:04 AM
Chuck is my favorite new show as well. NBC is not Fox and I doubt they will cancel Chuck before they finish airing all the episodes the've ordered so far even though the ratings have been so-so so far. Bionic Woman continues to suck though I watch it anyways. Moonlight is doing fine, for a Friday show, so I doubt CBS will cancel it any time soon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on October 26, 2007, 07:54:27 AM
Give it to me with both barrels.

What was your opinion of Beans Baxter?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 26, 2007, 08:29:46 AM
Big Bang Theory

It's not a favorite of mine, but I find it damn funny. It's completely unbelieveable, and really, there's no reason for the chick to even give any of these guys the time of day. But fuck is it funny, especially the geeks who aren't the guy that used to play David on Roseanne. The episode where they break into her apartment to straighten the place up was just a scream.

I like Chuck a lot, though I like Journeyman better. Maybe it's because I didn't watch Quantam Leap, or maybe it's just a mancrush on Kevin McKidd, but I dig that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 26, 2007, 08:54:22 AM
I have a history of loving stupid shows. WKRP, Night Court, Married With Children....if that helps explain my psyche.

See, the thing about those three shows is they were genuinely funny, and (for the most part) still hold up even today. (Night Court and MWC both suffered from 'on the air too damn long' comedy syndrome.)

Caveman?  Nothing there at all.  It was taking a pop culture reference and trying to pretend it's more than it actually is.   Imagine if someone had tried to turn the "Where's the Beef" lady into a show rather than just commercalizing the hell out of it for the year and a half it was big. 




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: raydeen on October 26, 2007, 10:36:01 AM
Big Bang Theory

It's not a favorite of mine, but I find it damn funny. It's completely unbelieveable, and really, there's no reason for the chick to even give any of these guys the time of day. But fuck is it funny, especially the geeks who aren't the guy that used to play David on Roseanne. The episode where they break into her apartment to straighten the place up was just a scream.

I like Chuck a lot, though I like Journeyman better. Maybe it's because I didn't watch Quantam Leap, or maybe it's just a mancrush on Kevin McKidd, but I dig that show.

I'm going to have to try to catch Chuck online (if NBC is showing it-haven't really checked yet). As for Big Bang, the best visual joke in it is the fact that when they go up or down the stairs in their apartment complex, it's the same set for every floor with only minor adjustments made to the furniture or decor.

I've been digging on Journeyman but have pretty much lost interest in Bionic Woman. I think the only reason I'm watching it is because Starbuck is the bad girl.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 26, 2007, 11:07:48 AM
I gave up on Bionic Woman after the third episode. They were trying to pack too much into each episode, and none of the stories were making any sense or coming to any reasonable conclusion. It wasn't terrible, I just found myself unable to care about any of the characters.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 26, 2007, 11:48:15 AM
Haven't been watching much tube lately, but I did catch an amazing Frontline the other night. You can watch it online here:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/showdown/


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 27, 2007, 12:55:33 AM
Someone please name some good shows with long story arcs and little filler. I don't care about subject matter. Just list some stuff.

Also, I don't watch much TV, so don't worry if I've seen something or not. About the only things that come to mind at the moment are Heroes, Rome, Deadwood, and DS9.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 27, 2007, 01:22:41 AM
Dirty Sexy Money.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on October 27, 2007, 03:42:27 AM
Spooks, season 6
Doctor Who, series 1&3
K-Ville, season 1
Secret Diary of a Call Girl, season 1



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on October 27, 2007, 04:46:51 AM
Twin Peaks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: raydeen on October 27, 2007, 07:54:20 AM
The Shield. The seasons are short but they pack a lot in. I'd also recommend Rescue Me. I'd like to recommend 24 but the general population here would probably advise against it. I like me some shootin' screamin' drunk drivin' Kiefer though. Season 2 was probably the best.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Gutboy Barrelhouse on October 27, 2007, 09:20:59 PM
Yes Chuck is available online at NBC.com. I am finding myself watching more on my PC than on TV now since every show I watch is available online now it seems.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 27, 2007, 09:48:28 PM
Thanks, keep em coming. I've seen Twin Peaks (not sure why I had you pegged for a Lynch hater, Schild, but I did), but I could use something like that again!

24 may be a long story arc, but it kind of goes against the appeal of long-story-arc oriented writing to me. I like these type of shows mainly for the realistic character development -- but Jack Bauer, from what I can tell, is the complete antithesis of realistic character development. He's got way too much shit going on in his life  :wink:



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on October 27, 2007, 10:27:07 PM
The Wire.

Best TV show ever made. Period.


On another note, just got my Dish HD hooked up today and am loving it. The only problem is now SD now looks like total ass just by comparison.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on October 28, 2007, 12:22:09 AM
House.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on October 28, 2007, 02:21:04 AM
House.
The storylines in House are more episodic than continuous.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on October 28, 2007, 12:10:05 PM
The storylines in House are more episodic than continuous.
Apologies.  I saw the "good" but skipped over the "long story arc" part of the request.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on October 29, 2007, 08:44:12 AM
House has season long story arcs, they just aren't traditionally what you'd consider season-long story arcs. They are more about character development than something actually happening.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on October 29, 2007, 09:32:55 AM
Thanks, keep em coming. I've seen Twin Peaks (not sure why I had you pegged for a Lynch hater, Schild, but I did), but I could use something like that again!

24 may be a long story arc, but it kind of goes against the appeal of long-story-arc oriented writing to me. I like these type of shows mainly for the realistic character development -- but Jack Bauer, from what I can tell, is the complete antithesis of realistic character development. He's got way too much shit going on in his life  :wink:



Have you watched Farscape yet Stray?  I think you can pick up the DVDs pretty cheaply now.

For my money,  it's the best recent "true" (aliens and spaceships) scifi series.  There's an overall story arc,  which lead to the worst series cancellation cliffhanger evar!  Thankfully,  Scifi Channel ponyed up the money to do a 4 hour miniseries to close out events.  Some of the power of the series is lost watching it in chunks on DVD because they loved to use cliffhangers.

Going to second Rescue Me.  Damn great series.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on October 29, 2007, 09:45:19 AM
What happened to Rescue Me this season?  Is it over?  It seemed pretty meh compared to every other season.  I think the last episode I saw was September 19, and didn't seem anything like a season ender.

Top TV show of all time:  The Shield. If you haven't seen it, go rent season 1 and watch.  Then continue in order.  I think it's gotten better over time.  Last season was phenomenal.

The Wire's also good.

Damages ended up being quite good, I thought.  Not quite in the same class.

The new season of 24 looks very promising.  It's as much fun to make fun of as to watch; it kind of veers between the two for me.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on October 29, 2007, 09:53:56 AM
Damages ended up being quite good, I thought.  Not quite in the same class.

The ending was really unsatisfactory for me but I'm not quite sure why.  I watched it again on Saturday night, and I still had that "meh, that's lame." feeling about it.   I think it would have been more appealing if that episode had been the climax of the story, rather than the resolution... but that doesn't work out well either.  Hrm.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on October 29, 2007, 10:39:51 AM
Damages ended up being quite good, I thought.  Not quite in the same class.

The ending was really unsatisfactory for me but I'm not quite sure why.  I watched it again on Saturday night, and I still had that "meh, that's lame." feeling about it.   I think it would have been more appealing if that episode had been the climax of the story, rather than the resolution... but that doesn't work out well either.  Hrm.

The problem was the ending just didn't live up to all that build-up during the season.  It all made sense and was satisfactory, but it wasn't satisfying.  It was like great foreplay but bad sex.  I also have a feeling when the writers realized the show would be picked up for another season, they changed the ending a bit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on October 29, 2007, 12:21:32 PM
Don't forget "Dr. Katz, Professional Therapist" !


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on October 29, 2007, 01:24:09 PM
I forget about Farscape. Mmm...Chiana...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on October 29, 2007, 07:34:17 PM
Have you watched Farscape yet Stray?  I think you can pick up the DVDs pretty cheaply now.

For my money,  it's the best recent "true" (aliens and spaceships) scifi series.  There's an overall story arc,  which lead to the worst series cancellation cliffhanger evar!  Thankfully,  Scifi Channel ponyed up the money to do a 4 hour miniseries to close out events.  Some of the power of the series is lost watching it in chunks on DVD because they loved to use cliffhangers.


I love Farscape, but I'm really hesitant to recommend it to anyone.  It takes a good 1.5 to 2 seasons before it gets good, and Crichton is a very difficult character to warm up to.  It's got a lot of schlocky sci-fi staple episodes.  It's got some filler but does a fairly decent job of advancing a rather awesome and rewarding long term story line. 

The mini-series has a WTF moment or two, but I guess that's inevitable with what they had to accomplish. 

The series is still somewhat expensive at $80 bucks a season, but at least it's not $115 to $140 per anymore. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on October 29, 2007, 07:53:21 PM
I tried watching Farscape when it first came out. Didn't like it.

Both my old man and brother are big Wire fans...Forgot about that one. I'll give it a chance sooner or later. I'll try the Shield too.

Rescue Me or K-Ville. The idea of a show with Katrina refugees, or post 9/11 firefighters doesn't appeal to me. Honestly, I try to avoid anything on TV remotely dealing with either subjects these days.


Not long story arc based (well, perhaps they're a mix of linear and episodic), but believe it or not, i've never seen Buffy or Smallville. I downloaded the first seasons of each on a lark, but I'm liking them a lot so far.

Also, and I'm not sure if this is was intentional, but do these two shows almost seem identical to anyone else? It's like they applied the Buffy formula to the Superman universe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on October 29, 2007, 10:21:45 PM
Go get Six Feet Under


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 01, 2007, 03:53:15 PM
Never thought I'd see Whedon do another TV series for Fox, but it looks like he's working on a series called Dollhouse (http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/james-hibberd/2007/10/joss_whedon_returns_to_fox_wit.php) starring Eliza Dushku.

Quote
Joss Whedon, the creator of acclaimed cult favorites “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Angel” and “Firefly,” is returning to Fox and reuniting with “Buffy” regular Eliza Dushku for a new action-drama called “Dollhouse.”

Fox has given a seven-episode commitment to the 20th Century Fox Television project for a planned debut next year.

“It deals with our darkest impulses and our best ones,” Whedon says. “It deals with all the things I like to deal with—strength, weakness, power and corruption.”

“Dollhouse” stars Dushku as Echo, one of a group of secret agents living in a futuristic dorm. Each has the ability to be imprinted with custom personalities and abilities for special assignments. When they return, their newly acquired memories are wiped. The show follows Echo as she takes on a variety of assignments—some romantic, some adventurous, some uplifting, some illegal—and gains awareness of her role and confinement.

Any bets on whether or not it will make it past the seven-episode commitment, or if all seven episodes will even air?



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 01, 2007, 04:04:12 PM
Have to wait and see what day of the week it'll be shown on.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on November 01, 2007, 04:43:08 PM

Any bets on whether or not it will make it past the seven-episode commitment, or if all seven episodes will even air?


It will be scheduled for Friday nights, it'll be shown out of order, and it'll be canceled after the 4th episode, which will be the one guest staring Nathan Fillion.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 02, 2007, 12:10:04 AM
Speaking of Whedon, I mentioned that i just recently started watching Buffy...

So umm.. I'm on the second season. Does Xander die anytime soon? Cuz I might give up on the show if he doesn't.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 02, 2007, 12:12:46 AM
Speaking of Whedon, I mentioned that i just recently started watching Buffy...

So umm.. I'm on the second season. Does Xander die anytime soon? Cuz I might give up on the show if he doesn't.
No, he doesn't.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 02, 2007, 12:15:09 AM
Pity. Perhaps he can tolerable if he lays off the whole jealousy thing though. It's really pathetic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on November 02, 2007, 12:17:23 AM
Yes he does eventually.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 03, 2007, 07:54:17 AM
Oh, and just to give my impression of Smallville...

Great show (although Chloe is kind of irritating in the same way Xander is...). I wish there wasn't so much filler, and not so much bizarre shit happening because of Kryptonite, but the main, self discovery story arc is pretty great. I just got to the episode where Christopher Reeve tells him he's Kal El.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on November 03, 2007, 08:21:27 AM
I still don't get the love for Buffy and Smallville.  I've given both multiple tries but I never can get into them.  I thought Angel and Firefly were great, though, so I'm not just a Whedon-hater.

So Farscape's still $80 a season?  Great, looks like I'll ask for B5 this year instead as those finally dropped to $40 for a season.  I agree with Rasix, though, it takes a while to warm-up to Farscape for some folks.  I got into it right at the beginning (it helped it was the only decent space & alien sci-fi on TV at the time) and it had some really fun episodes, but I know the wife didn't get into it until I really made her start watching it.  Oh, and ditto on the "WTF" moments in the miniseries wrap-up.  Grrr.  :cry:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 03, 2007, 02:37:51 PM
I still don't get the love for Buffy and Smallville.  I've given both multiple tries but I never can get into them.  I thought Angel and Firefly were great, though, so I'm not just a Whedon-hater.

Which seasons of Buffy did try watching?  That show had some pretty big ups and downs. 

Couldn't get into Smallville at all.  There have been some decent episodes (the Red Kryptonite stuff in particular), but the show spends way too much time spinning it's wheels.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 03, 2007, 04:00:59 PM
I'm liking Smallville a lot more than Buffy simply because it's.... Superman. I agree about it spinning it's wheels though. But I find that Buffy does the same. I mentioned above that both have a similar formula. Only instead of the Hellmouth, it's the Meteor Rocks with Smallville. When they stop wasting time and get to the main storylines though, Smallville is more interesting to me.

Looking forward to Brainiac... Since Marsters is probably the only villain that has stood out in Buffy for me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 04, 2007, 01:36:28 AM
I'm liking Smallville a lot more than Buffy simply because it's.... Superman. I agree about it spinning it's wheels though. But I find that Buffy does the same. I mentioned above that both have a similar formula. Only instead of the Hellmouth, it's the Meteor Rocks with Smallville. When they stop wasting time and get to the main storylines though, Smallville is more interesting to me.

I think it's generally referred to as the "monster of the week" formula.  Smallville has never felt like Superman to me.  Superman isn't about ancient prophesies drawn on cave walls by Native Americans, and love triangles between Clark, Lana, and Lex.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 04, 2007, 05:37:44 AM
Heh, I'm a sucker for Native American clichés. I think the show would have been best served being told as a miniseries or something, but there's still enough of the whole Superman mythos here to keep me interested. Better than other TV show attempts at least. And better than that Singer flick.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on November 04, 2007, 02:15:45 PM
Heh, I'm a sucker for Native American clichés. I think the show would have been best served being told as a miniseries or something, but there's still enough of the whole Superman mythos here to keep me interested. Better than other TV show attempts at least. And better than that Singer flick.


I watch Smallville too.  I kind of lost track of it around season 3-4 but got back into it.  The newer seasons are what got me back into watching, as it moved away from the whole "dawsons creek" vibe I got from when they were still in high school. 

The mythology isn't too bad, at least they do give reasons and explain more as you go along in the series. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on November 04, 2007, 08:44:11 PM
I think Meg and the hotdogs on Family Guy tonight was the raunchiest thing I have ever seen on network TV.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on November 05, 2007, 12:48:09 AM
Couldn't get into Smallville at all.  There have been some decent episodes (the Red Kryptonite stuff in particular), but the show spends way too much time spinning it's wheels.

The only eps of Smallville I've liked are the ones with Sarah Carter and the red kryptonite, mostly because Sarah Carter was hot as hell in those.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on November 05, 2007, 09:18:08 AM
Writer's strike!  :awesome_for_real:

So no more Daily Show for a bit. Guess I'll read instead.. damn books!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 05, 2007, 11:49:07 AM
Smallville had a lot of potential. The monster of the week thing hurt it alot, and I stopped watching when they brought in Lois. They had such a great love triangle thing with Lana/Clark/Chloe and then Chloe starts writing things under the pen name Lois...best moment in the series imo.

Best superman-y moment for me (remembering I dropped out in what, 2nd season or so) was when he accidentally flew when Lana was trapped in the pickup in the tornado.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 06, 2007, 07:27:40 AM
This writer's strike is going to piss me off. It may cost a few new shows any chance at renewing, including Chuck which is among my favorite shows on TV. (in fact, I'd say only Dexter beats it.)

Fuck writers. Fuck producers. Fuck TV executives. This is why I went for a decade and watched maybe one series that whole time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on November 06, 2007, 07:46:30 AM
Writers strike is going to have a bigger effect on TV sooner rather than later.  All the major showrunners have said that they will not cross the picket lines and will not work on any more episodes in a producer capacity.

That basically means that any shows that aren't yet in the can won't get completed.  Expect to see shows dry up in the next couple of weeks.

Pencils Down Means Pencils Down (http://www.wga.org/subpage_member.aspx?id=2529)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on November 06, 2007, 07:48:12 AM
So Chuck's Stanford professor was testing out Intersect technology as bonus questions on his tests.  Chuck scored extremely well, which is why Bryce knew Chuck could absorb it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2007, 07:58:19 AM
Writers strike is going to have a bigger effect on TV sooner rather than later.  All the major showrunners have said that they will not cross the picket lines and will not work on any more episodes in a producer capacity.

That basically means that any shows that aren't yet in the can won't get completed.  Expect to see shows dry up in the next couple of weeks.

Pencils Down Means Pencils Down (http://www.wga.org/subpage_member.aspx?id=2529)
Shows that have stockpiled scripts in anticipation of the strike can continue to shoot until they run out of scripts. Most of the major scripted TV shows (not counting talk shows) have scripts to last them through this year.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 06, 2007, 08:12:08 AM
If there's any type of job with a limitless amount of scabs, it would be writers.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on November 06, 2007, 08:12:21 AM
Shows that have stockpiled scripts in anticipation of the strike can continue to shoot until they run out of scripts. Most of the major scripted TV shows (not counting talk shows) have scripts to last them through this year.

It's not going to prove quite that simple.  Just about all the major shows have writers on set to help with script changes as and when needed but they're not going to be there for a start.  The point about the showrunners not crossing the line is that they're not going to do any work that could, in any way, be seen as affecting the writing - including editing.  

An email from Shawn Ryan (creator of The Shield and The Unit) probably sums it up (http://www.unitedhollywood.com/2007/11/showrunners-stop-tv.html).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on November 06, 2007, 08:16:51 AM
If there's any type of job with a limitless amount of scabs, it would be writers.

You're not wrong. (http://www.hollywoodscabwriter.com/)

The WGA has basically promised to not accept anyone who crosses the picket line as a member in the future.  This will effectively mean that people who do so won't be able to get jobs with contracted companies after the strike is over.  Similarly WGGB members, while feasibly able to work for members of the AMPTP, will be shooting themselves in the foot with regard to future work - all for the sake of a quick and easy payday now.  There's a lot of solidarity here amongst writers for the strike.  Mainly because what they're striking about will have an impact for them too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 06, 2007, 08:18:09 AM
If there's any type of job with a limitless amount of scabs, it would be writers.

Actually no. The problem is, that if you are a scab, you can never join the WGA and it is pretty much the only game in town in Hollywood. So, nope. This strike is gonna cripple the entertainment industry, especially television.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 06, 2007, 08:23:09 AM
Not really saying anyone's going to do that. Just making a joke.  :wink:

....Though it should be said that thousands out there will struggle to attain WGA+Hollywood employment status no matter how respectful and dilligent they are. There's bound to be a few who probably wouldn't mind cashing in for the short term, thinking that's the best they'll get anyways.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2007, 08:24:24 AM
Shows that have stockpiled scripts in anticipation of the strike can continue to shoot until they run out of scripts. Most of the major scripted TV shows (not counting talk shows) have scripts to last them through this year.
It's not going to prove quite that simple.  Just about all the major shows have writers on set to help with script changes as and when needed but they're not going to be there for a start.  The point about the showrunners not crossing the line is that they're not going to do any work that could, in any way, be seen as affecting the writing - including editing.  

An email from Shawn Ryan (creator of The Shield and The Unit) probably sums it up (http://www.unitedhollywood.com/2007/11/showrunners-stop-tv.html).
Doesn't mean that production on those shows is going to stop it just means they'll have to make due without that help.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 06, 2007, 09:02:00 AM
As a writer myself, I'm totally behind the writer's strike. Both DVD and Internet revenues are going to be the money of the future, and they deserve to get their piece of that pie just like the Screen Actor's Guild and the production companies. The fact that the writers took DVD revenue off the table and the companies still gave them a big FU is fucking sickening.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 06, 2007, 09:05:39 AM
As a writer myself, I'm totally behind the writer's strike. Both DVD and Internet revenues are going to be the money of the future, and they deserve to get their piece of that pie just like the Screen Actor's Guild and the production companies. The fact that the writers took DVD revenue off the table and the companies still gave them a big FU is fucking sickening.

I am very selfishly pissed at all sides, but intellectually I side with the writers. The executives are being pricks and so everyone is suffering. I think they're hoping that the writers will cave and come back for whatever scraps they throw to them. I'm sure part of this also boils down to the fact that revenue for all parties in television is shrinking as they lose audience to cable and the internet and so everyone is getting selfish to hold on to what little is left.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 06, 2007, 09:09:35 AM
That's part of it. The revenue from broadcasting on the TV is shrinking, but they networks are replacing that revenue with ad revenue from replaying the episodes on the Internet, and the DVD box sales have been a huge boon (though one that's fizzling out these days). The networks want to keep that DVD gravy train coming as long as possible, just like they did with syndication money a few years ago. And the Internet revenue, they are just figuring out how much of that money has just been left on the table while they fought against offering show downloads.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 06, 2007, 09:24:19 AM
Writer strike during one of the greatest game release cycles ever? Eh, ok. Thanks, actually.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: murdoc on November 06, 2007, 09:30:38 AM
Writer strike during one of the greatest game release cycles ever? Eh, ok. Thanks, actually.

Agree ++


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on November 06, 2007, 09:32:12 AM
Yah, no shit.  Thanks guys.  Now I can catch up on all of the books waiting on my shelves, movies I haven't seen, and gaming backlog. 

 :thumbs_up:

I'll really only be pissed if this affects BSG (which I guess it will).  Other TV, ehh, I'll be OK without it.

Edit: come to think of it, this is really only slightly more annoying than a MLB, NHL or NBA strike.  :|


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 06, 2007, 12:07:51 PM
I'll really only be pissed if this affects BSG (which I guess it will).  Other TV, ehh, I'll be OK without it.



Since BSG isn't coming out until April now and is going to split its final season into 2 parts I'm on the verge of not giving a shit about how it all ends now. Really, the only characters in that show I still care about are Adama, hot blond cylon, Gaius, and hot Asian cylon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 06, 2007, 02:49:11 PM
Brian K. Vaughn talking about the Writer's Strike (http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=135331).

There's some seriously fucked up shit in there. The Writer's currently get 4 cents per DVD sold. 4 FUCKING CENTS. They were asking for 8 cents.

It just boggles my fucking mind. The creators of these things that sell for $100 box sets and they get 4 pennies and some asshead is bitching about giving them 8 pennies. That's fucking criminal.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on November 06, 2007, 02:58:38 PM
Look it's all your favorite tv shows going on hiatus for a year (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34700)

Quote from: Rasix
I'll really only be pissed if this affects BSG (which I guess it will).  Other TV, ehh, I'll be OK without it.

Quote from: AintItCool
Outside of Universal this morning was the bearded one himself, ["Battlestar Galactica" showrunner] Ron Moore, picketing the Universal Studios Gates with the entire writing staff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on November 06, 2007, 03:15:26 PM
I'll really only be pissed if this affects BSG (which I guess it will).  Other TV, ehh, I'll be OK without it.



Since BSG isn't coming out until April now and is going to split its final season into 2 parts I'm on the verge of not giving a shit about how it all ends now. Really, the only characters in that show I still care about are Adama, hot blond cylon, Gaius, and hot Asian cylon.

Spoiler: http://home.comcast.net/~daelus/bsg-spoiler.jpg


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2007, 04:45:44 PM
Brian K. Vaughn talking about the Writer's Strike (http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=135331).

There's some seriously fucked up shit in there. The Writer's currently get 4 cents per DVD sold. 4 FUCKING CENTS. They were asking for 8 cents.

It just boggles my fucking mind. The creators of these things that sell for $100 box sets and they get 4 pennies and some asshead is bitching about giving them 8 pennies. That's fucking criminal.
And that was supposedly the sticking point in their negotiations until the WGA dropped it at the last minute and the studios still wouldn't budge on the Internet, aka "New Media", stuff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2007, 04:50:16 PM
Look it's all your favorite tv shows going on hiatus for a year (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34700)
As I said above picketing showrunners doesn't mean those shows will stop production on the scripts they already have written.

On the other hand...
Quote
Joss Whedon reports that his old "Buffy" actors Alyson Hannigan (now on "How I Met Your Mother") and David Boreanaz (now on "Bones") were both picketing alongside the writers outside the Fox lot.
Well fuck that means no more new Bones epsidoes other than the ones they have already filmed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on November 06, 2007, 06:48:18 PM
Look it's all your favorite tv shows going on hiatus for a year (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34700)
As I said above picketing showrunners doesn't mean those shows will stop production on the scripts they already have written.

From the link

Quote
“We have non-writing producers on the show who are perfectly capable of doing any non-writing producing duties,” Mr. Daniels said. “They want me do to writing-producing and just pretend it’s producing. Every decision you make has a writing aspect to it. If they really just thought it was producing, they could just as easily get somebody else to do these tasks."

It would seem as if you need writers even while filming to rewrite scenes on the fly and the like.  I'm sure The Office is more akin to this than other shows, but I don't think the writers write a script and the directors film it verbatim.  It's a living process.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2007, 07:24:22 PM
They can manage without having the real writers around (sitcoms less so, though).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on November 06, 2007, 07:29:02 PM
I didn't know until now that writers were unionized.  Seems odd, given that shows can get cancelled at any time and the usual union restrictions about layoffs would be out the window.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on November 06, 2007, 08:06:01 PM
I'm no expert on labor relations, but I believe anyone can collectively bargain for a contract, regardless of whether they are technically a "union." I believe they distinguish themselves specifically as a "guild" rather than a union and don't have NLRB protection. They enforce things not based upon the unionization, "closed shop", employment position based concepts but upon the promise that if anyone goes outside the guild system they will be blackballed. It's really an old school model.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 06, 2007, 09:01:59 PM
Guild. Correct. Same with actors and filmmakers...Though the union stuff comes into play every once in awhile.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on November 06, 2007, 09:12:20 PM
Hollywood is very highly regulated. It's really a marvel, especially compared to software engineering, how they can keep things largely on-time and on-budget while negotiating a morass of regulations.

Nobody is going to give me a "hell yeah" for the Sarah Carter eps of Smallville? :pedobear:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 06, 2007, 09:13:54 PM
I just saw the first ep with her. Hot, squeeky little blonde. So umm.. Hell yeah.

Didn't see anything about red kryptonite yet though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on November 06, 2007, 09:16:29 PM
So this means no more LOST for me huh? I always knew they'd just leave it with a bunch of questions to fuck us all over.

"The writers already know the ending"... my ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 06, 2007, 10:05:22 PM
Lost had a definite end date of 2010 (48 more episodes, 16 per season) so yeah the writers probably do know the ending in vague terms.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 06, 2007, 10:50:01 PM
Lost has been made up on the fly for 2-3 years now.

Why are people still watching it? It turned from awesomest show ever to horseshit in record time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on November 07, 2007, 03:59:09 AM
Brian K. Vaughn talking about the Writer's Strike (http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=135331).

There's some seriously fucked up shit in there. The Writer's currently get 4 cents per DVD sold. 4 FUCKING CENTS. They were asking for 8 cents.

It just boggles my fucking mind. The creators of these things that sell for $100 box sets and they get 4 pennies and some asshead is bitching about giving them 8 pennies. That's fucking criminal.

Considering that I've been using the internet for longer than I've had a DVD player, it beggars belief that the AMPTP are still referring to the internet as "New Media" and trying to screw the writers over it just like they did with Home Video and DVDs 20 years ago. It beggars further belief that they are trying to claim that the DVD market is stagnating despite the fact that it is increasing by 4% each year and is bringing in over $16 billion a year (and that's a 2 year old figure). 

In percentage terms, the 4c increase that Haemish quoted relates to 0.3% of the profit made in a DVD sale.  The AMPTP are refusing this.

For this supposedly "new" media (i.e. downloadable or streaming content that's available over the internet and, in time, with the right technological advances, through your TV thereby meaning that it might well be the ONLY method of distribution in the future) the AMPTP want to pay the following percentage to writers as residual fees.  0 (Zero) %. 

It's totally fucked up.

The thing is that it's the tip of the iceberg.  If the writers cave then it gives the AMPTP leverage of the Actors and the Directors whose guild contracts are up for renewal next year.  While it's easy to say "Sure!  Why do Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt need to go on strike over money - they're fucking loaded!", it's the unknown actors and those trying to make a break into the industry who will be affected.  Just as it is with the writers and the directors.  If the newbies can't sustain a living because they don't get residual payments then the industry is going to suffer in the long term. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on November 07, 2007, 08:19:54 AM
Lost has been made up on the fly for 2-3 years now.

Why are people still watching it? It turned from awesomest show ever to horseshit in record time.

Because there are no sports on Wednesdays that I give a shit about.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on November 07, 2007, 08:42:43 AM
Lost has been made up on the fly for 2-3 years now.

Why are people still watching it? It turned from awesomest show ever to horseshit in record time.

And it's also gone from horseshit to incredibly awesome in the same record time.  That last season finale pwned EVERYTHING else on television.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 07, 2007, 09:43:26 AM
I still dig Lost, but I don't give up on shows as quick as some of you guys.

Yeah, not wanting to give writers residuals on "New Media?" FUCK YOU. Fuck you with a  :hello_thar: hiding in your fucking closet, you taintscrubbers. The shitheels know that 10 years from now, DVD sales will be a pittance of what they get off of "New Media" downloads, Tivo just being the type of the iceberg. Not paying residuals on that shit is fucking highway robbery and the writers need to hang on to that point like grim fucking death. When the time comes, the directors and actors need to sink their teeth into it as well.

If all my shows went off the air tomorrow, at least I'd have football to watch, and watch it I will until the shows get back on the air. It'll suck, but I'm more than willing to side with the writers on this one, not just because it's the right thing to do, but because I'd one day love to be one of them.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on November 07, 2007, 09:52:20 AM
Hollywood is very highly regulated. It's really a marvel, especially compared to software engineering, how they can keep things largely on-time and on-budget while negotiating a morass of regulations.

Nobody is going to give me a "hell yeah" for the Sarah Carter eps of Smallville? :pedobear:

(http://www.thatblondegirl.net/Gallery/Smallville/Promos/smpromo3.jpg)

She also nearly made DoA the Movie worth watching  :awesome_for_real:

Woot! My first reason to sue the smiley!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on November 07, 2007, 09:53:49 AM
Netflix was invented to cover scenarios such as this.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 07, 2007, 10:35:55 AM
She also nearly made DoA the Movie worth watching  :awesome_for_real:

Woot! My first reason to sue the smiley!

First off,why sue the smiley? What did it do to you?

Secondly, I enjoyed DOA. Sad but true. Then again I went in expecting Uwe Boll bad so almost anything was a pleasant surprise. Besides, the woman from My Name Is Earl was actually funny in it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on November 07, 2007, 10:40:56 AM
My only concern is that an extended strike will lead to even more 'reality' programming, which will force me to go on an extended killing spree. I don't have that kind of time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on November 07, 2007, 11:01:28 AM
I didn't know until now that writers were unionized.  Seems odd, given that shows can get cancelled at any time and the usual union restrictions about layoffs would be out the window.
Not all unions exist because of layoffs -- in fact, most don't, or at least didn't start that way.

Unions exist for a reason. I'm starting to suspect we might see a resurgence, in the strangest places, over the next few decades -- if not unions, then something equivilant. I wouldn't have thought that five years ago, but things are getting wonky enough in the white-collar world that they might start snagging more blue-collar concepts. I'm sure they'd call themselves something else, but it'd be the same thing.

I'm on the writer's side here, even if it means no good TV for awhile. And I hope it gets settled fast, because the last fucking strike led to reality TV which has haunted the world since.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on November 07, 2007, 12:59:33 PM
Most "reality TV" employs writers. They have the host, the narration, and a lot of them feed the contestants lines and do actual plotting as well.

In addition if people like editors are also striking then they are screwed anyway.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on November 07, 2007, 01:29:44 PM
Most "reality TV" employs writers. They have the host, the narration, and a lot of them feed the contestants lines and do actual plotting as well.

In addition if people like editors are also striking then they are screwed anyway.
Well, the writers voted like 90% in favor of the strike -- I'm not sure if they knew their guild had already compromised on DVD residuals (originally asking for a boost to 8 cents and then being willing to accept the current 4 cents, which was the sticking point according to 'management' -- obviously not the case), but if they hadn't that number would be higher.

Strike compliance is pretty close to 100%, and there's not going to be many scabs -- or anyone even willing to walk the line, because the Writer's Guild is threatening to blacklist anyone who does, and it's not something they have a real problem doing. It appears the talent is highly supportive of the strike -- I can't recall the proper term, but a lot are basically calling in sick or busy or whatnot. Not technically striking, but not working either. They're supportive, of course, because they ALSO want the same sorts of rediduals the writers are asking for, and their contract expires not too long from now. If the writers win, the actors probably won't even have to fight to get a similar deal.

It appears traditional unions -- teamsters and the like -- are being supportive as well, which doesn't really surprise me either. There's a lot of bad things about unions (about as many bad things as there are about companies, frankly) but they DO tend to be supportive of each other in general.

I have no idea how long the strike will go on, but my money's on the writers. They have a more sympathetic case, for one. They have the support of the actor's guild for two. And it's costing the companies god knows how much each day this goes on -- and while you can fill the gap with reality programming, the writers didn't give them a lot of lead time -- and you can't do a lot of reality movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on November 07, 2007, 03:10:19 PM
Most "reality TV" employs writers. They have the host, the narration, and a lot of them feed the contestants lines and do actual plotting as well.

In addition if people like editors are also striking then they are screwed anyway.

Reality TV, I believe, is currently one of the areas not covered under WGA contracts.  It was something else that they were trying to put on the table.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 07, 2007, 04:39:15 PM
Some reality TV shows like Dancing with the Stars use WGA writers. Most do not.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: voodoolily on November 07, 2007, 06:43:11 PM
Tears, Shears and Beauty on BET is full of win. (http://www.bet.com/OnTV/BETJShows/shearstears/)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 07, 2007, 09:33:30 PM
OK, so I saw the Red Kryptonite episode... In full agreement there.

I gotta say though, it kind of pisses me off too. I think I need to take a break from Smallville, just like Buffy. Clark's parents need to get smacked.

[edit] Or maybe I hate the Superman character more than I think. That little kid who played the Flash should have his own show instead..

[edit] Dude wtf? They killed her off? Bah


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on November 07, 2007, 09:47:43 PM
You know what? Fuck the studios for this ever coming up. Writing makes or breaks entertainment, period. Be strong writers!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on November 08, 2007, 12:31:42 AM
I don't watch Smallville regularly, I just lucked out and happened to see that Red Kryptonite episode, one of the ten or so I've seen total. The other 9 sucked.

She did I good job playing the cool crazy chick in that episode...not that I care about her acting that much but whatever.  :pedobear:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 08, 2007, 12:37:40 AM
Pedobear isn't necessary. She's almost 30. ;)

[edit] Btw, she was actually hotter in the first episode. When she first started stalking Clark, she teleported into his bed in her panties. He wussed out as usual (well...his parents broke in, but still...).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on November 08, 2007, 01:33:14 PM
Yes but I'm 73.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 08, 2007, 08:31:01 PM
The Office writers on why they are striking:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6hqP0c0_gw


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on November 08, 2007, 09:54:17 PM
That was pretty funny and sad. "Promos"...fucking lawyers...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on November 08, 2007, 09:58:28 PM
Hey now, we just parrot what our sleazy clients come up with.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: DraconianOne on November 09, 2007, 03:20:43 AM
Should probably start a new thread for this but as it's television.  Current status of (some) shows:

Quote
30 ROCK * Shooting #210 through November 9th. * No additional scripts have been written.

BIG BANG THEORY * Production shut down.

CAPTAIN, THE * Shooting #102 November 8th ­ 14th. * Have scripts for #103 and #104 (production will conclude 11/30).

CARPOOLERS * Production shut down 11/16

CAVEMEN * Shooting #113 November 7th ­ 13th. * No additional scripts had been ordered.

COLD CASE * Production shut down 11/16

DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES * Production shut down.

DIRT * Prepping #206 for a November 20th ­ 30th shoot. * Script written for #207 (only).

DIRTY SEXY MONEY * Shooting #111 November 8th ­ 19th. * Prepping #112 next week. Shoots o/a 11/21. * There are other scripts written but it¹s unclear if production will continue.

ELI STONE * Prepping #111 now which shoots ~ 11/15­11/26. * Not clear if there¹s another script that¹s been written.

GHOST WHISPERER * Shooting #312 November 12th ­ 21st. * No additional scripts written.

GREEK * Shooting #1018 starting November 15th. * No additional scripts (20 episode order) written.

HEROES * Production shut down 11/9.

K-VILLE * Shot #110 October 28th ­ November 8th. * No update.

MEDIUM * Prepping 069-09 for a shoot November 15th ­ 28th. * No additional scripts have been written.

NUMBERS * Prepping #412 for a shoot November 19th ­ 30th. * No additional scripts have been written

OCTOBER ROAD * Shooting #210 November 9th ­ 21st. * Have scripts through #213

OFFICE, THE * Production shut down.

OLD CHRISTINE * Production shut down.

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT * Canceled production on #210 (was meant to shoot 11/7-11/13) * No additional scripts written * Production shut down.

SAMANTHA WHO * Production shut down 11/12

SWINGTOWN * Shooting episode #103 11/9­11/21. * No additional scripts written.

ŒTIL DEATH * Episode #212 completes production on November 9th. * No answer at casting office

TWO AND A HALF MEN * Production shut down.

UGLY BETTY * Shooting ³Odor in the Court² 11/9 ­ 11/20 * Prepping ³A Thousand Words Before Friday² next week, starts o/a 11/21. * No additional scripts available after that.

WITHOUT A TRACE * Production shut down 11/22.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 09, 2007, 06:23:35 AM
Damn it, what about Chuck, Reaper, and Supernatural? Those are the ones I really care about!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on November 09, 2007, 07:15:23 AM
Quote
CAVEMEN * Shooting #113 November 7th ­ 13th. * No additional scripts had been ordered.

But can you really say that's because of the strike?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 09, 2007, 07:36:23 AM
The Office writers on why they are striking:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6hqP0c0_gw


7 Million Itunes downloads @ .04 cents per download = $280,000 that writers are owed. That's some serious cheddar. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 09, 2007, 07:48:39 AM
OK, so I didn't totally give up on Smallville.. Michael Rosenbaum just went from OK to completely badass. Knowing the pacing of this show now though, he'll probably revert back to OK again.... But it was nice to see the REAL Lex Luthor for a change.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 09, 2007, 09:04:58 AM
Hey now, we just parrot what our sleazy clients come up with.

I LOLed.

Been watching more It's Always Sunny.  Considering the three main actors are also the creators and writers, I'm assuming it will be safe from the strike.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 09, 2007, 09:17:00 AM
I think Sunny has finished their season (or at least production) but I did see the Rob creator guy on a list of striking writers.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 09, 2007, 01:02:42 PM
It's hard to know or care about seasons with TiVo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 09, 2007, 02:04:02 PM
I have such a backlog of shit I haven't seen (and can download in their entirety) that I'm not losing anything out of this either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on November 10, 2007, 03:37:47 PM
OK Ming just chopped the finger off a slave girl because she cut him while she was shaving him. Now that's proper Mingish behaviour! He can't help it if he looks like Corbin Bernson.

The new Flash Gordon show rocks.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 11, 2007, 09:07:56 PM
Sorry to ramble on about Smallville (LTTP and all that), but man, has anyone ever seen the Aquaman episode? That's about as cheesy as it gets (as if Aquaman wasn't already bad enough). I've seen more talent from porn stars.

The Green Arrow has turned out to be pretty cool though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 12, 2007, 02:21:34 AM
Sorry to ramble on about Smallville (LTTP and all that), but man, has anyone ever seen the Aquaman episode? That's about as cheesy as it gets (as if Aquaman wasn't already bad enough). I've seen more talent from porn stars.

The Green Arrow has turned out to be pretty cool though.

Yeah, Aquaman was pretty much crap, but then as I've said, I think the bigger problem with the show is that it seems to lack any clear direction.  They don't seem to want to make Clark "Superman" until the end of the series, and they likely aren't going to end the series until the ratings are no longer there to support it.  I'm sure I'll probably watch the last five episodes of the series, in whatever season that happens to be in (fucking Charmed lasted 8 years), but until then I fully expect them to get by on dragging in various DC characters to guest star, or giving Superman characters recurring roles (maybe they'll bring in Bibbo for next season).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 12, 2007, 04:45:06 AM
I don't know.. Superman could come sooner. The Green Arrow dude is starting to chew Clark's ass out a lot about wasting his time bundling hay.

[EDIT] Wait a sec... How much of this have you seen? I'm only on last season still, but.... they pretty much have a version of the Justice League already (by name as well). Impulse/Flash, Cyborg, Green Arrow, and Aquaman are all a team. Martian Manhunter is starting to pop up, helping Clark now too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 13, 2007, 10:04:37 PM
Vel, I recommend you give it a shot again. It really has a lot more direction than it would seem at first. Basically everything happening now is sort of like a long version of Kal El's training sequence in the beginning of the first movie. The whole rite of passage thing with Jor El, etc.. Less and less Dawson's Creek shit is happening, and like I said above, the DC universe is starting to flesh out as well. Green Arrow and the rest of those dudes are waiting on Clark to get his shit together, slowly forming Justice League, Martian Manhunter is starting to pop up, and the last season just ended on a cliffhanger battle between Clark Kent and Bizarro.


OK, enough about Smallville from me :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 14, 2007, 12:11:08 PM
I don't know.. Superman could come sooner. The Green Arrow dude is starting to chew Clark's ass out a lot about wasting his time bundling hay.

[EDIT] Wait a sec... How much of this have you seen? I'm only on last season still, but.... they pretty much have a version of the Justice League already (by name as well). Impulse/Flash, Cyborg, Green Arrow, and Aquaman are all a team. Martian Manhunter is starting to pop up, helping Clark now too.

That in some ways is part of my problem with the show.  It seems like they're so bound to the name Smallville, and to their original plans of never having Clark suit up as Superman until possibly the end of the series, that they're holding him back, but trying to move things forward by introducing the Justice League, Supergirl, Lois Lane, and Jimmy Olson.  It's got this bizarre feel like "we can't move Clark into Metropolis yet, so let's just have everyone else end up in Smallville for various reasons".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 14, 2007, 12:22:54 PM
They're not doing a bad job at that though. Sure, they're redefining some things, but it's not done outrageously or anything like that. About the only ones who are really fleshed out and know themselves are the Green Arrow and Aquaman. Cyborg's a newb, Impulse/Flash is still a kid. Supergirl has a long way to go. Lex has his moments, but he's not complete dick just yet. Lois is only now getting into reporting. Everyone is kind of figuring themselves out in a way just like Clark is.

Secondly, although it's called Smallville, it's taking place there less and less as time goes on. He doesn't meet up with Green Arrow except in Metropolis (and I think his team mainly works out of Star City or some shit).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 14, 2007, 12:25:18 PM
I've said it before, I'll say it again. No cape, no watch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 14, 2007, 12:33:04 PM
Lol, well.. umm.. He's got a red jacket, with a blue t-shirt ;)


Seriously though... Currently (finally up to date on the last episode), Clark's being a shit about the cape thing. I get ya. Some chick actually gave him a red cape, but he just hung it up by his barn.

...

One final thing -- I think it's hilarious that Zod (Terrence Stamp) is the voice of Jor-El. It's also kind of cool how everyone who's been involved with Superman productions over the past 30 years has made an appearance in the show. Chris Reeves being the big one. Then Margot Kidder. Helen Slater as his Kryptonian mother. Dean Kain. Even the chick that plays Martha Kent was Lana in one of the Reeves movies. Now if only they could get Gene Hackman and Ned Beatty somehow...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 14, 2007, 12:48:53 PM
Shows creators said they never wanted to have him in a cape.

Mostly because capes are for jerks. It's like the graphical stamp of gay.

Anyway, Justice League getting formed? Time to pick up the rest of the DVDs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on November 14, 2007, 01:10:29 PM
Shows creators said they never wanted to have him in a cape.

Mostly because capes are for jerks. It's like the graphical stamp of gay.

Anyway, Justice League getting formed? Time to pick up the rest of the DVDs.

It's actually a copywright thing.  They said they wouldn't ever be able to show him in the full costume on Smallville.  That may change if the Superman/superboy legal troubles ever get finalized.

And yeah the Justice League.. is sort of formed already, with Green Arrow leading Impulse, Cyborg, and Aquaman.  Supes hasn't really officially joined them.  Also Chloe pretty much acted as their communications/info officer in one of the episodes with the codename watchtower.

Last season and this season have been pretty good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 14, 2007, 01:53:59 PM
Gay or not, without the cape, he's not Superman. Now, if they wanted to do a Conner Kent thing and give him the black T-Shirt with the red S, I'd be able to go with them. But without that? He's just generic bohunk superhero guy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 14, 2007, 02:57:38 PM
Umm, a "bohunk" is another word for gypsy/bohemian. Last I checked, Tom Welling wasn't even close to that description :wink:

..

Seriously though... I know what you mean -- but think you're wrong. It's more than that. The main gist of the character, as it stands so far in the show, is him trying to come to grips with his Kryptonian identity and that of being raised as a human. In this version of story, he fights the path handed to him by Jor-El (who has it more in mind for him to be a sort of ruler, albeit a benevolent one), and at the same time, considers Jonathan Kent, with all of the humanity that Jor-El lacks, to still be a little small minded. Instead of following either one fully, Clark slowly creates something on his own from the two.

So that's what keeps me interested. The idea that Clark himself creates Superman. That it isn't a part of his "destiny" at all. That he has to learn a lot of things before making it to that point.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 14, 2007, 03:04:08 PM
Anyway, Justice League getting formed? Time to pick up the rest of the DVDs.

It's a Justice League made up of Clark, Flash, Green Arrow, Cyborg, and Aquaman (they haven't been allowed to put Bruce Wayne in the show, and Wonder Woman is unlikely also).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 14, 2007, 03:10:38 PM
Someone explain to me these "copyright" issues. What's that supposed to mean? Why no suit? Why no Bruce Wayne? It's all owned by Time Warner, right? I figure that they could put Neo and Bugs Bunny in the show if they really wanted to.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 14, 2007, 03:21:56 PM
Someone explain to me these "copyright" issues. What's that supposed to mean? Why no suit? Why no Bruce Wayne? It's all owned by Time Warner, right? I figure that they could put Neo and Bugs Bunny in the show if they really wanted to.

In the case of Bruce Wayne, it's not a copyright issue.  It's some sort of conflict with WB's film division, who apparently don't want Bruce Wayne to appear on Smallville, I guess because they see it as something that could potentially hurt the Batman movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 14, 2007, 04:20:13 PM
Someone explain to me these "copyright" issues. What's that supposed to mean? Why no suit? Why no Bruce Wayne? It's all owned by Time Warner, right? I figure that they could put Neo and Bugs Bunny in the show if they really wanted to.

http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/08/02/superboy-copyright-faq/


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 15, 2007, 12:19:24 AM
Hmm, it's a shame and all how they screwed Seigel back in the day, but as far as my entertainment goes, I hope the case is ruled in DC's favor and "Superboy" is never brought up again. Hell, the character in the show isn't nearly a "boy" anyhow. He hasn't been in a highschool for a few seasons, and even when he was, I'd hardly consider highschool to be a "boy's age" either. Lastly, the actor playing him is in his 30's.

And as far as the show is currently being written, he is very much Superman. Chloe already jokingly calls him that, and he's been called the Man of Steel several times by others. Also, the traditional "S" logo pops up throughout the show. I figured that he just didn't have the suit because that's not where the story is at yet.

[EDIT]

In the case of Bruce Wayne, it's not a copyright issue.  It's some sort of conflict with WB's film division, who apparently don't want Bruce Wayne to appear on Smallville, I guess because they see it as something that could potentially hurt the Batman movies.

I suppose that Wayne isn't really necessary yet anyhow. He doesn't become Batman until, like, he's in his mid-20's, early 30's or something right? With Supes already the defacto "veteran" superhero by then. So I guess it doesn't fit with Smallville's chronology anyways.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 15, 2007, 01:04:02 AM
Hell, the character in the show isn't nearly a "boy" anyhow. He hasn't been in a highschool for a few seasons, and even when he was, I'd hardly consider highschool to be a "boy's age" either. Lastly, the actor playing him is in his 30's.
Superboy was of that age (high school) when he was part of the Legion of Super-Heroes and in fact of whole slew of those characters had "Boy" or "Kid" names -- that's just how their creators named them back then.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 15, 2007, 09:15:20 AM
Copyright law is SO FUCKED. While I would normally agree with authors claiming copyright on their creations, especially after the dirty tricks Warner used in the 40's to make their own Superboy, Mr. Siegel is dead. His family, like the Tolkein family, is exerting way too much influence over the copyrights of the original author. It's legal, but copyright was never meant to be an inheritance, it was meant to protect a living author from being screwed. To me, what the Siegels are doing is just as fucked as what Disney does with their attempts to protect Steamboat Mickey.

And what about Schuster? Is he not getting any of this luv for a character he helped create?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on November 16, 2007, 07:27:47 PM
You think that story is messy you should check out what has been going on with the Winnie the Pooh copyright case for the last 20 years.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 16, 2007, 07:58:51 PM
Gay or not, without the cape, he's not Superman.

Superman is an idea. Not a costume. Don't be a punk.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on November 16, 2007, 08:02:37 PM
Gay or not, without the cape, he's not Superman.

Superman is an idea. Not a costume. Don't be a punk.
LOL, you are touchy.  You quit smoking or something?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 16, 2007, 11:15:50 PM
Gay or not, without the cape, he's not Superman.

Superman is an idea. Not a costume. Don't be a punk.
LOL, you are touchy.  You quit smoking or something?
Eh? What's touchy about that?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 19, 2007, 09:14:57 AM
Gay or not, without the cape, he's not Superman.

Superman is an idea. Not a costume. Don't be a punk.

No, Superman is an icon. Icons can be fucked with, but some things must remain consistent or the idea is lost. Supes without the cape is like Jesus without the cross.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 19, 2007, 09:15:52 AM
Gay or not, without the cape, he's not Superman.

Superman is an idea. Not a costume. Don't be a punk.

No, Superman is an icon. Icons can be fucked with, but some things must remain consistent or the idea is lost. Supes without the cape is like Jesus without the cross.
You're crazy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 19, 2007, 09:50:09 AM
I won't go as far and say that Superman without a cape isn't Superman but he definitely looks "wrong" to me when drawn without it, as does Batman for that matter.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2007, 09:54:26 AM
Capes are cool when he's flying.

Umm... Perhaps that's why the original artists gave him one in the first place.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on November 19, 2007, 11:08:15 AM
Superman is all about the blue and red, a big S, and a silly haircut. I don't think the cape is going to break up my view of the icon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 19, 2007, 11:14:27 AM
Supes without the cape is like Jesus without the cross.
So it would be Superman without all the tacked-on psuedo-mystical magic reincarnation mythos garbage that totally clouds the true message he came here to give?

You just made Superman without a cape so much more interesting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 19, 2007, 01:37:31 PM
Superman without a cape is Moses.  Sheesh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2007, 01:42:38 PM
Moses had a cape too.

(http://myhero.com/images/philosophers/moses/moses2.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 19, 2007, 02:28:09 PM
Supes without the cape is like Jesus without the cross.
So it would be Superman without all the tacked-on psuedo-mystical magic reincarnation mythos garbage that totally clouds the true message he came here to give?

You just made Superman without a cape so much more interesting.

Supes without a cape is just another hero with super-strength who can fly. The cape (and really the whole costume, Big S and all) is what makes him an identifable icon. Smallville's Clark isn't an identifiable icon, he's just an angsty teen heartthrob with superpowers. He might as well be Peter on Heroes (though I think Peter is cooler).

If they didn't try to convince me it's Superman, i.e. called it something besides Smallville, and him something besides Clark Kent, I'd probably be able to watch it. But my comic geek roots won't let me enjoy a Superman that purposefully ignores the cape/costume combo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 19, 2007, 02:57:17 PM
OK, now I'm in agreement with Schild. I mean, the cape is cool, but hardly what seperates him from other characters. I don't even read the comics and know that at least. I think the only one cheapening Superman is you.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on November 19, 2007, 02:59:49 PM
Clark is wearing the red and blue Superman colours constantly this season. The cape will come eventually.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on November 19, 2007, 11:12:51 PM
Maybe not, maybe Smallville-Clark watched the Incredibles.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 08:17:08 AM
It's not cheapening the character of Superman to ask that creators maintain some consistency with the goddamn history of the character. There's a new take on the character and then there's blatant pussyfooting with the history. He wore the cape, the red and blue and the big S as a teenager. To say that he didn't and try to claim it's the same character is just horseshit. It's at best an Elseworlds take on the character, which is fine, but don't sell it to me as Superman.

Cos it ain't Superman, it's a teenage kid with super-powers and Kryptonite monsters of the week.

It's like that execrable Birds of Prey show they tried to foist on us, only Black Canary was a teenage psychic runaway without sonic powers and Huntress was a slutty dressed goth chick. The story was mildly entertaining, but it wasn't Birds of Prey.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 20, 2007, 08:23:36 AM
Lol, I can't believe the cape is holding you back that much. How funny.

[edit] Actually, I'm surprised. You seem to a like a lot of character development in stories -- which is what the gist of the "no cape" Clark in Smallville comes down to. He's far more interesting than some guy with the Superman title as his default birthright. In Smallville, he grows into the part. Not only that, but like I said earlier, he creates the Superman identity himself. It's not given to him by Jor-El.

Anyways, the show is 7 seasons and counting. It wouldn't have lasted that long if it sucked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on November 20, 2007, 09:41:17 AM
You do realize what station it's on, don't you.  7th Heaven anyone?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on November 20, 2007, 09:41:54 AM
Television RAPES Your Childhood for 3488 points!
You DIE!

Play again? y/[n]
>


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 09:52:15 AM
he creates the Superman identity himself. It's not given to him by Jor-El.

Superman wasn't given the identity by Jor-El. If anything, his values and the core of his character comes from the Kents. Jor-El is really just a side character, a plot device to get him to Earth, even in the movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 20, 2007, 10:28:49 AM
From what I remember in the movies, Jor-El sent him not just to propagate whatever was left of his race, but that Kal-El be some kind of guardian/savior for Earth. He gave him a cape and everything, specifically talked about what the "yellow sun" would do to him, and basically wrote out his entire destiny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 11:23:27 AM
That's because Richard Donner made shit up that is in no way true to the character. While I enjoy the movies, especially 2, that shit ain't in the comics. Jor-El has alternated between being a plot device to being a well-meaning fucker that manages to aid an authoritarian government.

And the more I think about the Donner movies, even as good as the fighting in #2 was, lots of things about the character are just plain wrong. Giving up the powers to be with Lois Lane... that's just not Superman.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 20, 2007, 11:26:07 AM
Quote
Giving up the powers to be with Lois Lane... that's just not Superman.

Love conquers all. That's part of superman.

I really don't know where you're coming up with this stuff. Superman is not the same man as his father. He's the Kent's Son.

Also, Superman has a character has gone through so much back and forth in the comics that it's almost safer to just take the canon from the movies or smallville. They do a better job at most of that shit anyway. Particularly Smallville.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 20, 2007, 11:58:50 AM
That's because Richard Donner made shit up that is in no way true to the character. While I enjoy the movies, especially 2, that shit ain't in the comics. Jor-El has alternated between being a plot device to being a well-meaning fucker that manages to aid an authoritarian government.

And the more I think about the Donner movies, even as good as the fighting in #2 was, lots of things about the character are just plain wrong. Giving up the powers to be with Lois Lane... that's just not Superman.
But hey....he had a cape!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 12:06:17 PM
Quote
Giving up the powers to be with Lois Lane... that's just not Superman.

Love conquers all. That's part of superman.

I really don't know where you're coming up with this stuff.

Probably from 30 years of reading and enjoying comic books. The movies are not true to the character. Hell, Lois and Clark was truer to the character than either Smallville or the Donner movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 20, 2007, 12:09:58 PM
Why do you hate Freedom?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 12:15:58 PM
Because Freedom's been killed, George Bush has skinned it, is wearing Freedom like he's Leatherface, and is currently fucking me up the ass without even the benefit of a reacharound.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 20, 2007, 12:20:39 PM
Quote
Probably from 30 years of reading and enjoying comic books. The movies are not true to the character. Hell, Lois and Clark was truer to the character than either Smallville or the Donner movies.

Maybe the solution is to stop reading the comic books.

I mean, comeon, the fucking cape?

I lolled. Twice.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on November 20, 2007, 12:26:52 PM
You'd think someone that can stomach a DBZ game on the Wii would be able to look past a piece of fabric.  :headscratch:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 20, 2007, 12:27:35 PM
30 years of reading and enjoying comic books. The movies are not true to the character. Hell, Lois and Clark was truer to the character than either Smallville or the Donner movies.
True to which character, though? 30 years is only part of Supes' legacy, going back to what, the 30s? How many writers and historical revisions has that been, and which is authoritative?

edit: Found this site: http://www.supermanhomepage.com/comics/comics.php?topic=comics-SupermanTimeLine

Sounds like the Man of Steel plotline seems most consistent for his early life, and Smallville captures quite a bit of that.

Disclaimers: I liked Smallville's approach for the most part, with the caveat I mentioned earlier about Lois/Chloe. Also, I was a rabid Marvel fan and disliked DC outside Swamp Thing and Detective comics.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on November 20, 2007, 12:28:06 PM
I get what Haemish is saying, the Superman character was never first and foremost about his relationships with others and the effect of hiding his identity on them and himself. It was primarily about Superman fighting teh evil for truth, justice and a big helping of Apple Pie. I know that might come off as derogatory but it was the point of the comic version. Smallville puts the relationships first, it doesn't use his identity as a superpowered incognito as a potential plot point in a supervillian plot but uses the supervillian as a point in the identity plot.

I disagree that the character is different but there's a massive change of focus between Superman in Smallville and Superman, to the extent that it's very much a different sort of story altogether. Superman never used the secret identity thing in the same way that Spiderman did in the comics, it was more often than not a little tool for a bit of extra suspense or comedy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 20, 2007, 12:35:30 PM
Anyways, the show is 7 seasons and counting. It wouldn't have lasted that long if it sucked.

Charmed lasted 8 years.  From what I could tell from the commercials, the last season or two seemed to consist almost entirely of episodes that were flimsy excuses for the women to dress up as Mermaids, or Superheroes, or whatever other fantasies they could work into the show for the lonely guys at home watching.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 20, 2007, 12:41:48 PM
Some shows die a slow death, when they should have ended sooner (X-Files comes to mind). I don't think that's the case with Smallville though. It's getting better over time, not worse.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 01:48:36 PM
Notice I've never said that Smallville was a BAD show. It actually looks decent from what I've seen. It's just not Superman to me, and thus I can't watch it. Maybe when it's over I'll Netflix the whole thing and curse my self for stupidity. But for now, it just ain't Superman to me. NowhereMan encapsulated my thoughts better than I have.

As for the DBZ Wii game, try it. It really is a shitton better than it has any right to be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on November 20, 2007, 01:55:42 PM
Just wanted to say yeah Chuck!  Great episode, they managed to up the ante and start a plotline that is more than just an episode or two.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on November 20, 2007, 02:33:10 PM
How do you guys manage to talk about Superman in various mediums for a page or two without mentioning the Timm/Dini animated Superman?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 20, 2007, 02:41:13 PM
Because that's a true, iconic version of Superman, and we were talking about Smallville.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 20, 2007, 03:02:57 PM
The Superman in those cartoons is all business. Which is boring to me. Batman or Iron Man are the more interesting "all business" characters to me (probably because they bring their demons to the job). Smallville, otoh, opened up a lot of things about Superman that I never paid attention to -- that of someone struggling with keeping secrets, grasping for some sense of identity, and simply wanting to be normal, but having all kinds of obstacles in the way of that. Similar to the Peter Parker story, I guess.

This may be overstating it, but outside comics, the closest thing that I can think of in comparison to it is the Last Temptation of Christ. The Donner movies tried to touch on that angle briefly too, but Smallville carries the idea further. When it's at it's best at least.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on November 20, 2007, 05:24:48 PM
Just wanted to say yeah Chuck!  Great episode, they managed to up the ante and start a plotline that is more than just an episode or two.
Which is going to get cut off very abruptly unless the strike ends soon :sad_panda:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 21, 2007, 07:45:01 AM
Just wanted to say yeah Chuck!  Great episode, they managed to up the ante and start a plotline that is more than just an episode or two.

Yes, awesome episode. I called the ending when I saw the previews for this week's show, but it was still cool to see.

It's funny I didn't recognize the actor playing Brice. He was one of the fugitives on the mediocre Traveller show that ABC ran this past summer.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on November 21, 2007, 01:04:12 PM
Some shows die a slow death, when they should have ended sooner (X-Files comes to mind). I don't think that's the case with Smallville though. It's getting better over time, not worse.

And I think if the show were to last another five years, they'd still be dragging out the story to avoid making him Superman.  They've never seemed to have an overall plan, which is sad because they have point A (Clark living with Ma and Pa Kent in Smallville) and point B (Clark adopting his Superman identity, moving to Metropolis, becoming areporter) and yet they've completely been unable to tell a story that moves from point A to point B because they've decided they can't reach point B until the end of the series.  Instead they bring in points C, D, E, etc... (Clark meeting Lois, the formation of the Justice League) and drop them in the series at random creating a jumbled mess. 

So now we have Clark knowing Lois for several years before he moved to Metropolis (and due to restrictions put in place by WB before Superman Returns released, the writers weren't allowed to hint at a future relationship between the two of them), and pretty much throwing out the whole dynamic of the iconic Superman/Clark/Lois relationship in the process.  Instead of Superman being one of the main inspirations for other superheroes, we have him more or less following the Green Arrow's lead?  I agree with Haem.  This really isn't Superman.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 21, 2007, 01:36:41 PM
Pa Kent is dead, Ma Kent became a State Senator (and is moving to US Senator/DC). Clark is preparing to pack up to go to Fortress of Solitude to finally listen to what Jor-El wants to teach him -- but first, he must get rid of some Phantom Zone stragglers... Which he just finished up with. Supergirl has complicated things a bit though. Lex is becoming shittier than ever, and it's unlikely him and Clark will ever be "buddies" again. Green Arrow is waiting for Clark to do what has to do, but he's pretty much expecting him to join his team. Lois is finally a reporter.

I don't know dude.. Seems like it's moving on from typical Smallville based stuff to me.

[edit] Oh, and he's hardly following the Green Arrow. Do you guys just talk without watching or what? Green Arrow has explicitly said how he can't measure up to him, and doesn't understand why he doesn't join now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on November 21, 2007, 01:42:42 PM
So, how many seasons is Smallville?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 21, 2007, 01:52:14 PM
It's on 7 now, but if you haven't watched it, you could just start at 5 or something (and maybe brush up on the early eps as well).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on November 24, 2007, 06:49:19 PM
Is it worth going back to season 1 and watching?  My brother has been a big fan and recommended it to me, but I quite got around to watching it.  (Read the comics as a kid, though in the 60s).  Is it still about the fight for truth, justice and the American way, or has it become pc?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on November 24, 2007, 06:57:27 PM
Yeah, it's worth watching season 1. Yeah, he fights for justice and all that, but he's still figuring himself out at that stage too, which is kind of the show's charm. The only real problem with the first season is that the writing is a bit serialized. The stories themselves can be cool, but it can get on your nerves a bit if you like longer story arcs like me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on November 24, 2007, 07:53:34 PM
I liked the first few seasons of Smallville. I watched them at first partly because they filmed half of it within a mile of where I grew up, but it was still entertaining. The "cafe" Lana ends up owning is actually the local cheapy movie theatre in a town called Cloverdale. The show lost me once they started reaching the Indian burial ground (I'm 1/8 Mi'kmaq, I don't have to say native 'merican) and the Jor'el crap.

Oh yea, the reason I came here. Just watched BSG Razor. Enjoyed it, hyped me for the next season like it should have. Nice to see Michele Forbes playing supreme psycho again. If you haven't seen it, it has a cameoish appearance that made my inner 70's fanboi goo.

"By your command."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on November 24, 2007, 08:40:16 PM
If you haven't seen it, it has a cameoish appearance that made my inner 70's fanboi goo.

"By your command."


Heh.. I had the same reaction.  My wife just shook her head at me as I explained why it was so awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on November 24, 2007, 09:00:50 PM
Razor was good; Helena Cain is a total bitch and I'm glad she'd dead. I'd have mutinied and tried to kill her myself.

Please explain the by your command and the gold dealie. I never watched the original. I surmised that the originals were offshoots and evolutionary dead-ends and will never be mentioned in the series again. and the gold one was some sort of leader caste.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on November 25, 2007, 01:06:32 PM
Ok, my stupid DVR glitched and deleted 2 key minutes. Right when the shriveled up hybrid dude told Major Shoots McCivilians to come closer to have her sins forgiven it cut out and didn't pick up until after the commercial break where Adama and Lee are chatting. Can someone fill me on what happened there?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on November 25, 2007, 02:07:48 PM
The old hybrid guy told her that Kara Thrace was destined to lead humanity to Armageddon if they followed her. She started to pass that along to Apollo but their communications went out.  And then she set off the nuke.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on November 25, 2007, 02:30:26 PM
Ah, thanks. That's a rather significant plot point that my DVR tried to deny me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on November 26, 2007, 05:50:37 AM

Please explain the by your command and the gold dealie. I never watched the original. I surmised that the originals were offshoots and evolutionary dead-ends and will never be mentioned in the series again. and the gold one was some sort of leader caste.

Yea, you have the gist of it. There were various ranks in the show, and any lower ranked Cylon always responded to higher ranks with By your command. I also think it was the fact that you actually had Centurions piloting the raider that was cool to me, since that was something they took out in the new series when they made Raiders in to their own entities.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on November 26, 2007, 09:57:48 AM
Exactly.  It was a pure fanservice moment for us old timers.   Kind of like how Dirk Benedict bumped into the Cylon in the A-team's opening credits.

The only thing that was missing was the constant "woo-woo" of their eye scanners. (Or maybe I'm going more deaf than I thought..)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on November 26, 2007, 10:45:14 AM

The only thing that was missing was the constant "woo-woo" of their eye scanners. (Or maybe I'm going more deaf than I thought..)

It was there, I had my surround turned up pretty high.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on November 26, 2007, 11:05:15 AM
I didn't watch, hoping UniversalHD picks it up soon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on November 27, 2007, 06:13:16 AM
Started watching Journeyman recently. Is decent.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on November 27, 2007, 06:38:23 AM

Please explain the by your command and the gold dealie. I never watched the original. I surmised that the originals were offshoots and evolutionary dead-ends and will never be mentioned in the series again. and the gold one was some sort of leader caste.

Yea, you have the gist of it. There were various ranks in the show, and any lower ranked Cylon always responded to higher ranks with By your command. I also think it was the fact that you actually had Centurions piloting the raider that was cool to me, since that was something they took out in the new series when they made Raiders in to their own entities.

Those original Cylons always sounded to me like they came right out of a certain old (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berzerk)  video game (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAkOZNP8XIA&feature=related).

Edit: Stealth Youtube edit!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 27, 2007, 08:44:40 AM
I watched BSG: Razor.

SPOILERS (In case you haven't seen it yet):







Was anyone else pissed off by the elder Adama in this episode? First, he goes along on the mission, which makes sense, but claims it's Lee's command. Then he OVERRIDES Lee's command at the first critical moment, but when it comes time to decide who gets to sacrifice themself with the nuke, he tells Lee it's his decision. WTF? Either all the command decisions are Lee's, or none of them are. It felt like another tacked-on conflict just to build some needless dramatic tension. Other than that, I liked the story a good bit. Cain was a complete cunt. Too bad Shaw bought it, she could have been a good addition to the crew.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on November 27, 2007, 10:13:02 AM
Pineapple.

I am not sure why I love this show.  I know it's completely retard but I don't care.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 27, 2007, 10:54:52 AM
Best Chuck Episode Yet. I really dig where they are going with the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on November 27, 2007, 10:59:41 AM
Chuck got picked up for a full season today. In other news rumor is the Writer's strike is almost over. Apparently the agents talked to each party separately and things are close to being fixed.

And I love Chuck. Yvonne Strahotsky helps of course.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on November 27, 2007, 12:18:34 PM
Oh, and more on BSG: Razor. Is it just me, or is Number Six SOOOOOOOO much hotter as the strawberry blonde lesbian? I mean, she was always decently hot as the blonde #6, but that more understated look she was sporting right up until they figured out she was a Cylon was just SMOKING.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on November 27, 2007, 03:25:33 PM
I'm glad Chuck got a full season.  It's one of my favorite new shows this season. 

Plus the smoking hot blonde and the addition of Adam Baldwin do alot to enhance the show.  :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on November 27, 2007, 11:24:56 PM
Oh, and more on BSG: Razor. Is it just me, or is Number Six SOOOOOOOO much hotter as the strawberry blonde lesbian? I mean, she was always decently hot as the blonde #6, but that more understated look she was sporting right up until they figured out she was a Cylon was just SMOKING.
Agreed.  Tricia Helfer is sooooo much more hot when she's not trying to be.  The supermodel clothes and makeup just cover up her already fantastic natural beauty.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on December 03, 2007, 09:34:18 PM
If there's one thing I've disliked about the last 2 seasons of Dexter, it's been the Dokes character.  That is until yesterday.  The scenes with him near finally redeemed that character.  You could really feel him being overcome with dread, revulsion and sickness all a the same time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 04, 2007, 06:58:34 AM
If there's one thing I've disliked about the last 2 seasons of Dexter, it's been the Dokes character.  That is until yesterday.  The scenes with him near finally redeemed that character.  You could really feel him being overcome with dread, revulsion and sickness all a the same time.

Dexter has been really good this season. I'm actually still in suspense about Doakes. I think he has a 50/50 chance of surviving the season. I'm now anxiously awaiting Lila's death however.

I think it's cool how they're really messing with Dexter in this season.

Now to talk about my other current favorite, Chuck.

How did you guys like last night's episode? And I wonder what will happen when it comes back after the new year? I don't think Adam Baldwin will actually try to kill him, but it seems to me that Chuck being targetted is going to disrupt the "normal" parts of the show. And has anyone else noticed Awesome and Ellie seem to have lesser roles as the season goes on? And lastly, I'm actually warming up to Morgen since he started going out with Anna.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on December 04, 2007, 07:18:46 AM
Chuck wasn't one of the better episodes. On the other hand it had Sarah in her underwear *and* a bikini so it wasn't all bad. Morgan is still annoying.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 04, 2007, 10:40:45 AM
I tried to watch Tin Man on Sunday,  since Scifi has a pretty good record on miniseries (The Lost Room, Galactica, Farscape, etc).

Wow.  I couldn't watch it for more then 15 minutes at a time before turning the channel,  despite the fact that Scifi dropped some heavy money on getting name actors.  Just poor and uninteresting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on December 05, 2007, 03:42:49 PM
I saw the whole thing and was pretty impressed, I like what they did with it.  The tie-in to the original oz was pretty lame though, and I think it really could've done without it.  (Time apparently moves at the same rate in Oz as in our world, yet generations upon generations upon generations of dorothy's magical ancestors have been around in..60 years?)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 05, 2007, 03:46:13 PM
I'm an Alan Cumming fanboy. Pretty gay, right?

Anyways, I'll probably dl it or something. My cable doesn't have Sci-Fi on demand unfortunately.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 05, 2007, 09:07:35 PM
I saw the whole thing and was pretty impressed, I like what they did with it.  The tie-in to the original oz was pretty lame though, and I think it really could've done without it.  (Time apparently moves at the same rate in Oz as in our world, yet generations upon generations upon generations of dorothy's magical ancestors have been around in..60 years?)

Hmm, my thoughs:

1) Monkeys fly out of her boobs.
2) I see what the DG actress was trying for, but it was a fucking bad idea. Her character sapped my will to live at times.
3) Part Two was the high point, such as it was.
4) I thought the Emerald would be bigger.
5) Set design and costuming was pretty solid.
6) Dude, stop calling it "The O. Z". Seriously. It wasn't funny the first time, you rejects. You should have just called it "Oz" or used the full name.

Mostly, if they'd decided to do "darker reimaging" with less nods to the original and a lot less "Look how clever we are" bits in there, it would have been better. I think the idea was pretty solid -- but then, I've read Wicked and have a soft spot for Darker Oz. I certainly liked the Tin Men as gunslinger/cops, and the kind of Steampunk/Art Deco versus Art Noveau dichtomy in the sets was nice. They just needed a serious pass at the script to remove some of the "Wee! Look how clever we are" and some good acting direction and they'd have had a much better show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on December 06, 2007, 11:34:47 AM
My local NBC affiliated decided to preempt this week's Chuck for a fucking Billy Graham Crusade. Thanks, Billy.  :mob:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 06, 2007, 11:38:10 AM
My local NBC affiliated decided to preempt this week's Chuck for a fucking Billy Graham Crusade. Thanks, Billy.  :mob:

Seriously, that's a sin worthy of storming the local affiliate and hanging them all from the rafters. I'd probably fire off several very angry emails about that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on December 06, 2007, 12:31:03 PM
S'ok, I figure we're about 1 year away from simulcast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on December 06, 2007, 02:08:25 PM
My local NBC affiliated decided to preempt this week's Chuck for a fucking Billy Graham Crusade. Thanks, Billy.  :mob:

You gotta get yourself into a nice blue agnostic-leaning state, my man.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on December 06, 2007, 06:15:28 PM
My local NBC affiliated decided to preempt this week's Chuck for a fucking Billy Graham Crusade. Thanks, Billy.  :mob:
Check your listings to see if it's being rebroadcast this week. My NBC station shows it again on Saturdays. Or just download it from NBC or the usual places.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on December 06, 2007, 08:40:23 PM
I saw the whole thing and was pretty impressed, I like what they did with it.  The tie-in to the original oz was pretty lame though, and I think it really could've done without it.  (Time apparently moves at the same rate in Oz as in our world, yet generations upon generations upon generations of dorothy's magical ancestors have been around in..60 years?)

Hmm, my thoughs:

1) Monkeys fly out of her boobsSee bold italics, two of my favorite things, in one! How could you not love this?
2) I see what the DG actress was trying for, but it was a fucking bad idea. Her character sapped my will to live at times the goo out of my penis.
3) Part Two was the high point, such as it was.
4) I thought the Emerald would be bigger.
5) Set design and costuming was pretty solid.
6) Dude, stop calling it "The O. Z". Seriously. It wasn't funny the first time, you rejects. You should have just called it "Oz" or used the full name.

Mostly, if they'd decided to do "darker reimaging" with less nods to the original and a lot less "Look how clever we are" bits in there, it would have been better. I think the idea was pretty solid -- but then, I've read Wicked and have a soft spot for Darker Oz. I certainly liked the Tin Men as gunslinger/cops, and the kind of Steampunk/Art Deco versus Art Noveau dichtomy in the sets was nice. They just needed a serious pass at the script to remove some of the "Wee! Look how clever we are" and some good acting direction and they'd have had a much better show.

It was 6 hours, it's bound to drag in a few parts, should've been cut down to 4 with less filler, but overall still worth watching, I would've gladly shelled out $8 at the theatre for the experience.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 06, 2007, 08:53:47 PM
It was 6 hours, it's bound to drag in a few parts, should've been cut down to 4 with less filler, but overall still worth watching, I would've gladly shelled out $8 at the theatre for the experience.
I don't regret watching it. I think if they'd have tossed the Flash Gordon idiots they had working on it, and made some changes here and there in the script and art direction it couild have been a very solid mini-series. I suppose what irked me the most is I saw what it could have been and was, for the Sci-Fi channel at least, surprisingly cloose to getting.

Also, whoever said "Hey, let's call him Ahamo" was a fucking moron. Although when DG said "What's Ahamo" if they'd have cut to Alan Cumming muggijng at the camera, that would have made it okay.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on December 06, 2007, 10:12:35 PM
They should have spent all that money for Tin Man on another season of Dresden Files.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 06, 2007, 10:57:37 PM
They should have spent all that money for Tin Man on another season of Dresden Files.   :awesome_for_real:
No kidding. Dresden Files had decent ratings, but not among the key male demographics.

However, I understand Tin Man was originally pitched as a series -- last Tin Man in a conquered Oz, which I think could have been good in the right hands.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 07, 2007, 06:26:01 PM
The last season of The Wire starts up on January 6th on HBO. If you haven't seen the show, you should go out and rent (or buy, they are that good) seasons 1-4 so you can watch season 5.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on December 08, 2007, 09:11:54 PM
The last season of The Wire starts up on January 6th on HBO. If you haven't seen the show, you should go out and rent (or buy, they are that good) seasons 1-4 so you can watch season 5.

I just watched Season 1. It was amazing. And now I have a whole four seasons more to watch! Really impressed with HBO - Rome, Deadwood, The Wire, etc.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 03:12:42 AM
So... Can someone give me a rundown on what happened in Buffy as to make a show like Angel possible? I stopped watching a little bit after Spike took over that little vampire clan, and Angel went bad, killed the computer teacher, and joined him. The show started boring me for various reasons, but I thought Spike and Angel were cool... Figured I'd give Angel a chance.

Anyways, how did those two become good? What the hell did Angel do to get Buffy's little group to even accept him back again (I'm assuming she did..)? WTF turned Spike into a do-gooder? Just spoil everything if you can.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on December 18, 2007, 03:22:46 AM
So... Can someone give me a rundown on what happened in Buffy as to make a show like Angel possible? I stopped watching a little bit after Spike took over that little vampire clan, and Angel went bad, killed the computer teacher, and joined him. The show started boring me for various reasons, but I thought Spike and Angel were cool... Figured I'd give Angel a chance.

Anyways, how did those two become good? What the hell did Angel do to get Buffy's little group to even accept him back again (I'm assuming she did..)? WTF turned Spike into a do-gooder? Just spoil everything if you can.

You couldn't make it through 3 seasons of Buffy to find out some of these answers (Spike becoming good is really the only thing you'd need to see the last couple seasons to understand)?  If you found Season 2 of Buffy boring (it's generally thought of as being the best season), I'm not sure how long you'd last with Angel (which was even more hit or miss than Buffy, except for the final season which was good stuff).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 03:39:57 AM
Hmm, looking at the buffy episode list, it appears that I stopped watching RIGHT before Angel redeemed himself...? I guess I'll give it a shot again. I'm more interested in what happened to Spike though. Are you saying that I have to watch entire seasons just to get the story there? Huh...? :\


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on December 18, 2007, 04:21:28 AM
The glib answer is that it all revolves around sex with Buffy. The long-winded answer is you can read the Wikipedia entries:

Angel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_(Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer))
Spike (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_(Buffyverse))

Edit: fixed links, SMFcode doesn't like parens in URLs, spelling



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 04:33:15 AM
Spike (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_(Buffyverse))


(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7d/William_pratt.gif)


Lol, maybe I'm gonna have to watch the rest of Buffy, after all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on December 18, 2007, 04:52:57 AM
Because of an old gypsy curse Angel got his soul back like a hundred years before he even met Buffy so he was good for as long as she knew him. The kicker was that the curse only lasted until he had a moment of perfect happiness and that happened for him when he and Buffy slept together. That's why he suddenly became evil and joined up with Spike again.

...
He got better and was spun off for his own show.
...

Spike started to take a greater role in things and the chemistry between him and Buffy got pretty strong but he was still a soul-less monster and Buffy knew that and rejected him because of it. This upset him and he went off towards the end of season 6 and ended up getting his soul back which turned him good just in time to participate in the last season of Buffy and save the world at the cost of his own life. Yay for Spike!



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 05:35:57 AM
I know about the Gypsy Curse. I just don't understand how he got good again. Or WHY in the hell would Buffy want him around after all of that. And most of all, Giles -- I mean, he killed his girlfriend.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on December 18, 2007, 05:56:52 AM
Since you obviously rather have us tell you than watch those episodes yourself:

Willow cast a spell to give him his soul again using the same curse the Gypsies used the first time. She found the spell on a floppy disk prepared by Giles girlfriend right before Angelus killed her.

Buffy sent him to hell in a fight (moments after the spell worked), but due to their truest love ever he returned next season summoned by her thinking about him. She hid him from the others because they all would have killed his sorry ass again. Then as the next apocalypse approached, they had more important things to do.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 18, 2007, 05:59:19 AM
Oh, and Giles never ever forgave him.  Those of you who thought he did weren't paying attention.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on December 18, 2007, 06:04:10 AM
Indeed, the Librarian can hold a grudge like its nobodies business. Once a Vampire is on his bad side, he can passive-agressive the shit out of him. Or plot to have him killed by a third person so that Buffy isn't mad at him for killing her boy toy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 06:19:42 AM
Since you obviously rather have us tell you than watch those episodes yourself

I already said I'd give them a shot again. At least the Angel related stuff. I'm just responding at one little issue at this point. It doesn't hurt anyone.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on December 18, 2007, 06:25:47 AM
I just think we are spoilering quite some twists in the plot at this point. It might hurt your viewing pleasure. Oh, what am I saying, its Buffy the Vampire Slayer, its plot twists are not exactly rocket science. Ask away, I'll try to answer it!  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 18, 2007, 06:44:25 AM
Heh, so far you've told me what I want to know. It's just that I caught an episode of Angel last night and it entertained me. Seemed like a funnier show. Now I want to jump to that and fast forward through Buffy.

I am downloading seasons 2 & 3 of Buffy right now though, but if I get the urge to rush through again, I'll ask.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on December 18, 2007, 06:47:42 AM
Angel did get to be pretty funny especially towards the end. My personal favourite was the episode where he was turned into a muppet. :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 18, 2007, 07:09:53 AM
I laughed hardest at the one where Wesley got his throat slit.

Good Times.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on December 18, 2007, 07:50:49 AM
You just hated poor Wesley because he was English. Bastard.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 18, 2007, 08:11:12 AM
Indeed, the Librarian can hold a grudge like its nobodies business. Once a Vampire is on his bad side, he can passive-agressive the shit out of him. Or plot to have him killed by a third person so that Buffy isn't mad at him for killing her boy toy.
Giles was fucking awesome. My only complaint was that I firmly believe he should have continued kicking Evil Angry Willow's fucking ass, rather than "lose" and let Xander redeem her with love or some shit.

Evil Angry Willow was not nearly as fun as Bisexual Vampire Evil Willow, and I got sick of her ass about 10 seconds after she went all ugly and crazy. Although I did support the skinning of the Geek Squad members.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on December 18, 2007, 11:35:36 AM
Angel did get to be pretty funny especially towards the end. My personal favourite was the episode where he was turned into a muppet. :)

It helped that they brought Ben Edlund (creator of the Tick) on as a writer in the last season.  He's the one who wrote the puppet episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on December 18, 2007, 11:42:42 AM
Evil Angry Willow was not nearly as fun as Bisexual Vampire Evil Willow, and I got sick of her ass about 10 seconds after she went all ugly and crazy. Although I did support the skinning of the Geek Squad members.

Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow had better skin.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on December 18, 2007, 12:44:07 PM
Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow had better skin.
One of the best lines of the show was Willow's (after meeting Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow) "And I think I'm kind of gay" remark.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on December 18, 2007, 01:05:58 PM
Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow had better skin.
One of the best lines of the show was Willow's (after meeting Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow) "And I think I'm kind of gay" remark.

Foreshadowing!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on December 18, 2007, 01:43:13 PM
Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow had better skin.
One of the best lines of the show was Willow's (after meeting Evil Bisexual Vampire Willow) "And I think I'm kind of gay" remark.

Actually I liked the follow up by Angel and (I think) Giles better.

Giles: "Vampire personalities are nothing like the real one."
Angel: "Well actually...." *gets an evil look from Giles. "he's right."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 21, 2007, 06:11:54 PM
Glad I picked it up again. Faith and that Mayor dude are great characters. Season 3 is much better than 1 or 2... Not sure why 2 is even a fan favorite. It sucked. As much as I liked Spike, Drusella and evil Angel ruined it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on December 21, 2007, 08:17:50 PM
There's some tv channel that I never noticed before named Ion TV.  (We have Comcast)  Sunday they're broadcasting Hogfather. 

Hogfather
Sunday, December 23rd at 7/6c
Starring Joss Ackland, Sir David Jason, David Warner, Sir Ian Richardson, Michelle Dockery, Stephen Marcus

Ian Richardson's role is the voice of DEATH, which is a wonderful choice.  I love his voice.  Anyway, just thought fans would want to know since I haven't noticed anyone chatting about it.  I have to warn you, however, that it is a two part, 189 minute show but with all the adverts it's 240 minutes long.  EEK.  We watched "Flood" (meh... but it has Robert Carlyle, David Suchet, and some other notables), and there's a HUGE number of adverts.  I suggest DVR'ing it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cim on December 22, 2007, 09:52:22 AM
 I miss angel. ;_;


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 24, 2007, 05:33:08 AM
GAH! I think I'd like to see Willow die now rather than Xander. If there's anything that Joss Whedon truly sucks at, it's writing about "love" and whatnot. This guy must not know shit except his own painful experiences. His characters just become completely unbearable when they get the shaft, or start pining for someone.


And WTF is this fascination with Willow anyways? She's almost unbearable to begin with.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on December 24, 2007, 06:48:40 AM
Redhead.

Really, I'm easy like that!  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on December 24, 2007, 07:09:26 AM
She is gormless.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 24, 2007, 07:24:10 AM
On the flipside, the episode "Hush" from season 4 is great (the one with those "Gentleman" dudes, who silence people). I'll have to show that one to friends who have been wondering why I'm even watching this show.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on December 25, 2007, 08:08:39 AM
Ok, I don't even know what tv show we're talking about anymore.   (http://forums.ratedesi.com/images/smilies/icon_shrug_no.gif)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 25, 2007, 09:25:03 AM
Still talking about Buffy. "Hush" is a good episode for someone who has never given it a chance.

Finally started on Angel too. It's OK, but it needs a good villain asap.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: rattran on December 25, 2007, 10:33:59 AM
Angel gets a bunch of different villains, but never really got one that clicked I think.

I've been spending my tv time catching up on The Mighty Boosh. Fun, wierd show. http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/mightyboosh/ (http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/mightyboosh/) Noel Fielding was amusing thes season on Never Mind the Buzzcocks, and is a blast on his own show. Definitely not for everyone, but it fits my humor.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on December 27, 2007, 06:31:06 AM
"Once More, with Feeling" from season 6 is also a great episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 27, 2007, 09:23:20 AM
Angel gets a bunch of different villains, but never really got one that clicked I think.

Seriously, what's up with that? Same writers as Buffy, right? Buffy has only had one shitty villain really: The Master. Everything else is pretty good. Faith, the Mayor, Spike, Angelus, Adam

And to top it off, they just killed off Doyle.. And replaced him with Wesley? What?!



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on December 27, 2007, 09:30:54 AM
Angel gets a bunch of different villains, but never really got one that clicked I think.

Seriously, what's up with that? Same writers as Buffy, right? Buffy has only had one shitty villain really: The Master. Everything else is pretty good. Faith, the Mayor, Spike, Angelus, Adam

And to top it off, they just killed off Doyle.. And replaced him with Wesley? What?!



Supposedly....  the actor that played Doyle had a pretty serious drug problem (died of an overdose a couple years after getting axed from the show),  and he was dragging David Boreanaz into a party lifestyle.

I really liked the guy as Doyle.  Wesley grows on you, though.

I kind of liked Elizabeth Rohm on the show,  though she does nothing for me on Law & Order.

Edit:

I liked Adam as a villain, but he wasn't the original villain that year.  I'm pretty sure the "big bad" was supposed to be the government agency,  but the actress playing the doctor got an offer to do something else and jumped on it forcing the writers to go with the Adam plotline.  I could be misremembering.

My interest in Buffy only lasted through seasons 3-5,  and Angel only season 1 and 2. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on December 27, 2007, 10:57:43 AM
"Once More, with Feeling" from season 6 is also a great episode.

It better be. People hype it up quite a bit.... And all I know is that I hate musicals with a passion.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on December 27, 2007, 10:59:38 AM
There's some tv channel that I never noticed before named Ion TV.  (We have Comcast)  Sunday they're broadcasting Hogfather. 

Hogfather
Sunday, December 23rd at 7/6c
Starring Joss Ackland, Sir David Jason, David Warner, Sir Ian Richardson, Michelle Dockery, Stephen Marcus

Ian Richardson's role is the voice of DEATH, which is a wonderful choice.  I love his voice.  Anyway, just thought fans would want to know since I haven't noticed anyone chatting about it.  I have to warn you, however, that it is a two part, 189 minute show but with all the adverts it's 240 minutes long.  EEK.  We watched "Flood" (meh... but it has Robert Carlyle, David Suchet, and some other notables), and there's a HUGE number of adverts.  I suggest DVR'ing it.

Yeah man, i got this on DvD, its one of the best "Xmass" movies out. Its brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on December 30, 2007, 12:50:01 AM
I think we have reached the apocalypse. I just saw an ad for "Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew" (http://imdb.com/title/tt1114705/fullcredits#cast) which will be on VH1. No, it was not a spoof.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 30, 2007, 03:49:39 AM
"Once More, with Feeling" from season 6 is also a great episode.

It better be. People hype it up quite a bit.... And all I know is that I hate musicals with a passion.

It Blows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on December 30, 2007, 05:02:51 AM
Does it blow for any particular reason or are you just doing your cranky old man that hates anything popular routine again?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 30, 2007, 05:59:02 AM
It's a Musical Episode of Buffy.  It throws a fucking rock into an already in progress plotline that was fundamentally important and adult for the sake of a couple of shitty dance routines and corny/funny songs.

It drags the romance of two of the couples right into the limelight with the wankiest wankfest routines imaginable.  Indeed, the whole fucking episode is worthless except the line 'I think this line is mostly filler' line.

The baddy makes NO FUCKING SENSE AT ALL, in a program where the baddies pretty much always make sense.

It Blows.

I don't hate everything popular.  Don't be a nonce.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on December 30, 2007, 06:03:12 AM
I would have said it blows because Xander makes no sense at all characterwise, and the big reveal is stupid.

The peaceful coexistence of serious and somber alongside corny and funny was always one of the trademarks of Buffy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on December 30, 2007, 09:31:44 AM
Um ?

I don't get the Xander Reference.


Corny/Funny Songs are different.  Way Different.  Don't make me bop you on the head.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on December 30, 2007, 11:11:32 AM
i won't try to find an excuse for the fact that they wanted to make a musical episode. And despite them obviously having fun with it, it didn't really work for me. The plot just sucked.

But Funny/Corny right next to the most dreadful arcs happened all the time. Of course, if your problem is the songs instead of the corny/funny, then I can't argue against that.

I'm just glad they never got to make a musical version of an Angel episode, or - god forbid- Firefly with impromptu dance performances during firefights.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 02, 2008, 05:19:46 PM
Yah, so Adult Swim lost Futurama, and it winds-up on Comedy Central?  :uhrr:  Hopefully they'll use it as something to replace the other god awful animation shows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on January 02, 2008, 05:36:27 PM
Yah, so Adult Swim lost Futurama, and it winds-up on Comedy Central?  :uhrr:  Hopefully they'll use it as something to replace the other god awful animation shows.

Comedy Central is responsible for bringing Futurama back from the dead though.  :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 03, 2008, 06:19:08 PM
I take back the comment about Angel lacking good villains. The whole Wolfram and Hart thing kicks ass.

And Wesley has turned out to be a great character... Surprised me.

All in all, Angel is definitely better than Buffy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Prospero on January 03, 2008, 06:29:48 PM
Angel really found its feet after the first season. I still like Buffy, but Angel was good solid fun. Things get sketchy in season 4 I think, but the final season was solid. I'm hoping the strike doesn't kill off Joss' new show. I need more plucky, comical heroes/heroines in my diet.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 04, 2008, 08:35:14 AM
Angel really found its feet after the first season. I still like Buffy, but Angel was good solid fun. Things get sketchy in season 4 I think, but the final season was solid. I'm hoping the strike doesn't kill off Joss' new show. I need more plucky, comical heroes/heroines in my diet.

I started watching Angel from the beginning this week to give me something to do on the treadmill (NY resolutions ftl). I had forgotten how goddamned good that show was, even from the beginning. The first season had some crappy throwaway episodes, but it was very solid overall.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on January 04, 2008, 05:57:30 PM
The whole "Conner" thing was a bit of a low point in the show.  Adding emo teen angst is never a good idea.   Some bad spots in the last season (including the throw away death(s)), but Angel was good fun. 

I miss Joss Whedon shows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 04, 2008, 06:13:13 PM
Don't think I've gotten to Conner yet? I'm just starting the third season. Looks like Winifred is gonna part of the cast finally (those were the only eps I've seen before).

I'm really starting to hate Buffy though. First it was Xander (who eventually got cool), then the general whiny nature of some of the love story shit, and now it's Buffy sister. They need to bring in another precocious 14 year old to punch that little chick in the nose. Also, Spike is underutilized and gets shit upon a bit too much.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on January 04, 2008, 06:38:17 PM
I always found Angel to be much better than Buffy. I couldn't stand to watch most BtS episodes, and even thought the few Angel episodes she was in sucked.  I honestly believe most of the  :heart: for Buffy is only lust for SMG and AH.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 04, 2008, 07:06:38 PM
There was one episode I watched recently where Angel was trying to help Faith get her head together again... SMG made a cameo and tried telling Angel off about it. He basically just wtfpwned her ass in one scene and told her to get the hell off of his show (so to speak). It said a lot.


Speaking of Faith, there isn't an actress in any of these of shows that has a thing on her. Eliza Dushku is megahot, and even more so as a megabitch.  She should have gotten her own spin-off and wtfpwned Buffy's ass on it too.

Doesn't sound like she'll be much of a bitch in that new Whedon series though, but I'll give it a shot anyways.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 05, 2008, 09:58:20 AM
I've been catching a Brit show called "Life on Mars" on BBC America recently. Stars the guy who played the Master last on Doctor Who (the young crazy one, not the old fucker) as a cop who gets run over in present day England and wakes up in 1973 Manchester as a cop. He keeps having flashes that makes him think he's in a coma in 2007 and being instructed to do things in 1973 before he can come back. I dig it. The episodes they have now aren't the first season, not sure what season they are on, but it's a good, quirky show.

EDIT: Apparently, the season I'm watching is the 2nd and final season. I don't want to read the Wiki entry too much to keep from spoiling the later shows.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 05, 2008, 01:19:59 PM
Just STOP.

Get the Whole of the 1st season and the 2nd from ANYWHERE and watch 'em in sequence.

It's a brilliant show.  Not really sure how the fuck it's managing to translate itself across the water, but it's brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on January 06, 2008, 02:49:22 AM
Angel gets a bunch of different villains, but never really got one that clicked I think.

I've been spending my tv time catching up on The Mighty Boosh. Fun, wierd show. http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/mightyboosh/ (http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/mightyboosh/) Noel Fielding was amusing thes season on Never Mind the Buzzcocks, and is a blast on his own show. Definitely not for everyone, but it fits my humor.

I really love this show, if you're happy with its style you might want to also check out their live show which is essentially them without any kind of BBC censor. In some respects they get a bit carried away with the randomness but it's also got some really great moments.

Somewhat off topic (It's not about Buffy!?!) as it's not strictly TV but anyone who hasn't seen the latest Secret Policeman's Ball (Amnesty International comedy) really should do themselves a favour and watch it. Features some great stand up and good sketches, wide enough variety of comedy that you'll probably find some new series or performers you like.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 06, 2008, 05:22:38 AM
Somewhat off topic (It's not about Buffy!?!)

Heh yeah sorry about that. Late to the party and all... Lucky that I'm not recapping every episode I've been watching.  :wink:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on January 06, 2008, 06:27:31 AM
Heh it's ok, I've never really properly sat down and watched Buffy, seen lots of random episodes, and it's interesting enough to hear some of the meta-plot stuff.

Also thanks to the Christmas holidays I've been watching an inordinante amount of Top Gear and QI. Top Gear is an amusing enough show that used to be about reviewing cars. It has since become about doing stupid stunts, showing off ridiculous super cars and interviewing celebrities with a blokey cast of 3 guys who are obviously enjoying themselves. It's not high quality television but its pretty entertaining, especially some of the specials that involve a race to the north pole with one of them on a sled and the other two driving. Not sure how well the humour would translate to the States but their race from Florida to New Orleans in cars they bought for $1000 (that involves driving through Mississipi with "Man Love Rules OK" and other such comments painted on their cars)

QI is a comedy show masquerading as a quiz (along the lines of Have I got News for You) where contestants get points awarded for giving interesting answers and lose them for giving obvious (and wrong) ones. It's quite funny, hosted by Stephen Fry and if you enjoy trivia you'll absolutely love it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 06, 2008, 02:24:20 PM
The Wire starts back up tonight. Watch it. You probably won't completely understand what is going on but you will see it is so good you will go rent the first 4 seasons.

EDIT: Right before the new ep, they are doing a recap called the "Wire Odyssey" which will catch you up on major plot points.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 07, 2008, 08:11:04 AM
OK, Buffy Update #342

I take back what I said about Dawn. She doesn't just need to be punched in the nose -- she needs her throat sliced.

The reason I dislike her is the same reason I disliked Xander at first (as well as Willow and her stuttering girlfriend later on) -- they're all self absorbed, needy little bitches. But Dawn truly takes the cake.

Just to give an example -- I just watched one episode where Buffy had a birthday party... And as the party was winding down, and people were getting ready to leave, they all find out that they're trapped in Buffy's house for some mysterious reason. They can't open the door to go outside, and even get physically paralyzed when they think of exiting. Eventually, a scene comes where everyone is huddled together and starts worrying.. Some people express concern about not being able to make it to work, school, appointments, etc.. Then out of the fucking blue, Dawn starts stomping her foot, crying "You just don't want to be here any longer because of me, right??!!" and then storms off to her room screaming. Everyone's like "WTF???" Needless to say, she turns out to be the culprit (she made some wish to a demon so that everyone would spend time with her).

And every fucking episode since she's appeared has been like that. Just the episode before it was like that. Buffy thinks she accidentally killed some random chick while hunting demons -- she decides to report herself to the cops -- but before she does so, she tries to have some sisterly talk with Dawn, tells her what she did, and that she was going to the police. Then immediately Dawn goes ballistic and starts crying about how Buffy doesn't care about her anyways. No argument, nothing. It just segued into some psycho rant. And this girl's 16 years old -- wtf is her problem?

Anyways, I'd be surprised if anyone reads this -- but if you do, please tell me that this "Conner" angst thing from Angel (which someone mentioned above) doesn't get nearly as bad. That's been a pretty damn good show so far, with characters who actually act like adults.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 07, 2008, 08:41:09 AM
Just STOP.

Get the Whole of the 1st season and the 2nd from ANYWHERE and watch 'em in sequence.

It's a brilliant show.  Not really sure how the fuck it's managing to translate itself across the water, but it's brilliant.


Very very well, at least for me. The slang is sometimes hard to understand, but I can follow the stories well enough, and I love the guy playing Hyde. Does the second season resolve anything, and if not, are there talks of anymore seasons?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 07, 2008, 08:45:52 AM
Top Gear is an amusing enough show that used to be about reviewing cars. It has since become about doing stupid stunts, showing off ridiculous super cars and interviewing celebrities with a blokey cast of 3 guys who are obviously enjoying themselves. It's not high quality television but its pretty entertaining, especially some of the specials that involve a race to the north pole with one of them on a sled and the other two driving. Not sure how well the humour would translate to the States but their race from Florida to New Orleans in cars they bought for $1000 (that involves driving through Mississipi with "Man Love Rules OK" and other such comments painted on their cars)

Top Gear is hilarious. But the show where they drove through the US didn't almost get them killed in Mississippi... it was Alabama where they got chased off for the Man Love Rules and Hillary for President comments. The only thing they noted in Mississippi was when they got rained on in one of our gully washer storms.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 07, 2008, 08:46:49 AM
The Conner angst is ...different.

No really, I remember thinking "Not another instantgrowth teenager, what the fuck is wrong with these people?"

But at least on this show people don't only want to punch him in the face for his behaviour - they actually do!  :awesome_for_real:


Life on Mars is adorable, it actually reminds me of some old police series I grew up with - Kottan ermittelt. And no, that was never translated or something! :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 07, 2008, 09:23:35 AM
OK, Buffy Update #342

I take back what I said about Dawn. She doesn't just need to be punched in the nose -- she needs her throat sliced.

The reason I dislike her is the same reason I disliked Xander at first (as well as Willow and her stuttering girlfriend later on) -- they're all self absorbed, needy little bitches. But Dawn truly takes the cake.

Just to give an example -- I just watched one episode where Buffy had a birthday party... And as the party was winding down, and people were getting ready to leave, they all find out that they're trapped in Buffy's house for some mysterious reason. They can't open the door to go outside, and even get physically paralyzed when they think of exiting. Eventually, a scene comes where everyone is huddled together and starts worrying.. Some people express concern about not being able to make it to work, school, appointments, etc.. Then out of the fucking blue, Dawn starts stomping her foot, crying "You just don't want to be here any longer because of me, right??!!" and then storms off to her room screaming. Everyone's like "WTF???" Needless to say, she turns out to be the culprit (she made some wish to a demon so that everyone would spend time with her).

And every fucking episode since she's appeared has been like that. Just the episode before it was like that. Buffy thinks she accidentally killed some random chick while hunting demons -- she decides to report herself to the cops -- but before she does so, she tries to have some sisterly talk with Dawn, tells her what she did, and that she was going to the police. Then immediately Dawn goes ballistic and starts crying about how Buffy doesn't care about her anyways. No argument, nothing. It just segued into some psycho rant. And this girl's 16 years old -- wtf is her problem?

Anyways, I'd be surprised if anyone reads this -- but if you do, please tell me that this "Conner" angst thing from Angel (which someone mentioned above) doesn't get nearly as bad. That's been a pretty damn good show so far, with characters who actually act like adults.

I'm sorry I didn't chime in earlier on this.  My Buffy advice is:  Watch seasons 1-3, then pretend the rest never existed.  It sounds like its too late for you, but perhaps I can save some other lurking soul.   


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 07, 2008, 09:50:31 AM
Stars the guy who played the Master last on Doctor Who (the young crazy one, not the old fucker)

That would be Eric Roberts, I believe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 07, 2008, 10:06:35 AM
Your believe is somewhat misguided here. His name is John Simm!  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 07, 2008, 10:43:44 AM
There is a Master in the post-Eccleston era?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 07, 2008, 10:48:45 AM
Indeed there is, at the end of the third season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on January 07, 2008, 10:50:46 AM
He is what was good about Human Traffic, too.  Him and Danny Dyer.  I loves 'em.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on January 07, 2008, 11:12:07 AM
Anyways, I'd be surprised if anyone reads this -- but if you do, please tell me that this "Conner" angst thing from Angel (which someone mentioned above) doesn't get nearly as bad. That's been a pretty damn good show so far, with characters who actually act like adults.

Conner doesn't get quite as whiny as Dawn, but you'll get to hate him so much more.  In fact I hated the whole second-to-last season of Angel (making the final season even that much more impressive as it's probably the biggest change in quality I've ever seen in a TV show going from one season to the next).  Dawn at least improves somewhat in the last couple seasons.  Conner just sucks.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 07, 2008, 11:22:57 AM
Conner doesn't get quite as whiny as Dawn, but you'll get to hate him so much more.  In fact I hated the whole second-to-last season of Angel (making the final season even that much more impressive as it's probably the biggest change in quality I've ever seen in a TV show going from one season to the next).  Dawn at least improves somewhat in the last couple seasons.  Conner just sucks.
If I understand the timeline correctly, the change in quality was pretty much directly due to Firefly being cancelled. Joss came back to focus on Angel during the last season, since Firefly was no longer a going concern.

(Fuck. Why the hell isn't someone picking up that goddamn show? Family Guy came back, Futurama came back -- there's a fucking history of shows the morons at Fox killed coming back to life. Why not Firefly? When's it gonna be my turn?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 07, 2008, 09:17:35 PM
I really enjoy Top Gear. It's so goofy yet cool at the same time. I was really glad that Hammond came out of that horrific accident so well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: lamaros on January 07, 2008, 09:30:35 PM
I really enjoy Top Gear. It's so goofy yet cool at the same time. I was really glad that Hammond came out of that horrific accident so well.

I watched the Africa episode yesterday. Very funny and enjoyable.

They're trying to make a local Australian version here at the moment. *shudder*


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 07, 2008, 11:31:13 PM
Holy shit? Wesley got his throat sliced? Man, he already had it bad after Gunn snatched away Fred.  :oops:

It sounds like its too late for you, but perhaps I can save some other lurking soul.   

Yeah... I keep wanting to back out, but everytime some kind of Buffy-Angel crossover happens, I get trapped into watching Buffy again, and forget why I dislike it.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Prospero on January 07, 2008, 11:52:31 PM
The North Pole episode of Top Gear is a damn good time. I was tickled to find out BBC puts most of Top Gear on youtube.  :heart: BBC

Now if only they'd put the full episodes of Doctor Who and League of Gentlemen up my world would be complete.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 08, 2008, 01:36:04 AM
Holy shit? Wesley got his throat sliced? Man, he already had it bad after Gunn snatched away Fred.  :oops:

Do you not read my posts or was it that you just didn't believe me ?

Best scene in Angel.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 08, 2008, 01:36:58 AM
And every fucking episode since she's appeared has been like that. Just the episode before it was like that. Buffy thinks she accidentally killed some random chick while hunting demons -- she decides to report herself to the cops -- but before she does so, she tries to have some sisterly talk with Dawn, tells her what she did, and that she was going to the police. Then immediately Dawn goes ballistic and starts crying about how Buffy doesn't care about her anyways. No argument, nothing. It just segued into some psycho rant. And this girl's 16 years old -- wtf is her problem?

You haven't raised many 16 year old girls, have you ?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 08, 2008, 11:03:56 AM
There is a Master in the post-Eccleston era?

Yes, at the end of season 3, and he was pretty damn cooky. It was a good ending to another great season, even without Billie Piper.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 09, 2008, 02:36:00 AM
You liked the ending?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 09, 2008, 02:42:11 AM
Personally I liked the master as the dark mirror of the current doctor. The plot of the ending sucked, though. Especially the "Now we all say Doctor to revive him" masterplan shit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on January 09, 2008, 02:49:39 AM
That ending simply wasn't Dr. Who. The Doctor isn't meant to beat his opponents by turning into fucking Neo and flying around stopping bullets because of the magical power of wishes. It came off as fucking lame writing that stretched the believability of a show that is usually incredibly good at spinning crazy ass stroylines.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 09, 2008, 02:51:14 AM
Tinkerbell Jesus Nonsense, I thought.  Let's revive with the healing power of LUV.

Also, the 'let's just reboot everything' made the previous episodes entirely pointless.

Never mind that the whole thing was nicked from every other show in the universe.  The Ming the Merciless ring scene was the final nail in the coffin.

It's a shame, because the preceding episode was fantastic.  Simm's Master was brilliant, though a departure from what was expected.  The phone conversation between Master and Doctor was awesome in every way.  The Master admitting that he was a coward (finally) was beautifully handled.  It was such a strong episode and then it just got flung away for pantomime nonsense.

er.

IMO.

Sorry, I'm getting carried away again.  A show for kids.  For Kids.

Sorry.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 09, 2008, 02:55:33 AM
I also really liked the dawning realization that the Doctor is essentially as broken as the master, for essentially the same reasons, but it had a different effect on him. That put a nice spin on an age-old-rivalry. But maybe thats not news for people who saw all episodes of the old series as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 09, 2008, 06:04:38 AM

I'm sorry I didn't chime in earlier on this.  My Buffy advice is:  Watch seasons 1-3, then pretend the rest never existed.  It sounds like its too late for you, but perhaps I can save some other lurking soul.   

That's shitty advice. Season 5 of Buffy is the best season of the show by far.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 09, 2008, 06:09:19 AM
Buffy Season 5 introduced Dawn. That blemish can't be removed from a Season easily.

Graduation Day acts a a fine finish to a great series if you are willing to let it go out on a high note.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 09, 2008, 08:25:24 AM
You liked the ending?


Yes, I did. Sure, it was a bit fairy-hippy-luv-conquers type of shit, but based on the concept of the technology the Master was using, it was inevitable. He had a great big psychic energy manipulator and the Doctor just redirected that energy to himself. It's not much different than "The Tardis is actually alive and gives Rose all its Tardis energy" thing. The Paradox machine resetting everything was just to keep the timeline consistent, because if they hadn't, that whole "Humans survive to the end of the universe" thing wouldn't have happened.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 09, 2008, 08:26:58 AM
I suspect I took more issue with the way that it was handled.

Which was poorly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on January 09, 2008, 08:41:07 AM
The fact that there were some great moments in it didn't help that I hated the rest of it. Also the fact that the episode didn't really have any of the doctor in but instead was pretty much all Martha didn't help much, while I don't mind companions having more to do and not being totally useless rubes good only for getting kidnapped they really shouldn't be the main focus of a series finale.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 09, 2008, 09:32:21 AM

I'm sorry I didn't chime in earlier on this.  My Buffy advice is:  Watch seasons 1-3, then pretend the rest never existed.  It sounds like its too late for you, but perhaps I can save some other lurking soul.   

That's shitty advice. Season 5 of Buffy is the best season of the show by far.

You won't see me say this often, but here goes- I agree with Triforcer. Once Buffy left high school, the whole dynamic of the show changed (losing Angel and Cordelia didn't help either).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on January 09, 2008, 10:11:41 AM
Flash Gordon just keeps getting better. Ming tried to kill a baby in the last episode and they keep trying to work in lyrics from the Queen song into the dialogue which amuses me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 09, 2008, 10:44:58 AM
Flash Gordon just keeps getting better.
You are what is wrong with TV. The police will be by shortly to confiscate your television.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on January 09, 2008, 11:08:35 AM
Flash Gordon just keeps getting better. Ming tried to kill a baby in the last episode and they keep trying to work in lyrics from the Queen song into the dialogue which amuses me.

Well, it only had one direction to go since it certainly couldn't get any worse.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on January 09, 2008, 11:32:12 AM
If anyone is looking for something new to watch Psych isn't that bad, it's definitely fits the bill for being entertaining.

And of course The Wire Season 5 just started, now that's good stuff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 09, 2008, 11:34:40 AM
And don't forget the incest plot point.

See the makers of Flash take "can't get any worse" as a challenge to dig the hole deeper, not as an opportunity to climb out.

And I submit the Hawkman episode as proof the Flash is deliberately bad not just accidently bad.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: JWIV on January 09, 2008, 11:41:16 AM
And don't forget the incest plot point.

See the makers of Flash take "can't get any worse" as a challenge to dig the hole deeper, not as an opportunity to climb out.

And I submit the Hawkman episode as proof the Flash is deliberately bad not just accidently bad.

How the fuck did anyone get past the first episode of Flash Gordon?  It's one of the worst things I have ever seen. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: rattran on January 09, 2008, 12:35:06 PM
I couldn't even make it through the first episode. And I :heart: the old serials.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on January 09, 2008, 02:07:09 PM
Well far be it from me to challenge the F13 group-think on the issue.  :awesome_for_real:


But... Journeyman is cancelled and Flash Gordon isn't. It must be some kind of conspiracy!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 09, 2008, 02:28:31 PM
Journeyman got canceled?

God damn, why do I even bother anymore.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 09, 2008, 02:40:51 PM
Well far be it from me to challenge the F13 group-think on the issue.  :awesome_for_real:


But... Journeyman is cancelled and Flash Gordon isn't. It must be some kind of conspiracy!

WHAT? Link that please, because I need something else to make me hate TV execs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 09, 2008, 02:53:48 PM
Old news.  They said they didn't have plans on picking up any further seasons sometime before the finale.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: JWIV on January 09, 2008, 03:00:01 PM
Well far be it from me to challenge the F13 group-think on the issue.  :awesome_for_real:


But... Journeyman is cancelled and Flash Gordon isn't. It must be some kind of conspiracy!

WHAT? Link that please, because I need something else to make me hate TV execs.

http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/detail/index.jsp?uuid=a210f827-8ffc-4882-834d-8fc1af7eb40c



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on January 09, 2008, 03:04:41 PM
Ming is pleased by your tears. :grin:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 09, 2008, 03:16:42 PM

I'm sorry I didn't chime in earlier on this.  My Buffy advice is:  Watch seasons 1-3, then pretend the rest never existed.  It sounds like its too late for you, but perhaps I can save some other lurking soul.   

That's shitty advice. Season 5 of Buffy is the best season of the show by far.

Season 5 was the last season I really watched.  It was inconsistent as hell.

There was some decent growth in the supporting characters (Xander, Anya, Spike),  and "The Body" is a great, great episode.  Much of the rest was pretty meh,  including Glory.  Though Giles little scene with Glory at the end of the finale is pretty solid.


Anyone catch the new episodes of The Daily Show and Colbert Report?  Stewart and Colbert were both on top of their games.  Colbert had me rolling with his "Who wants to be a pirate?" bit when interviewing the labor economist from Harvard.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 09, 2008, 08:57:42 PM
Well far be it from me to challenge the F13 group-think on the issue.  :awesome_for_real:


But... Journeyman is cancelled and Flash Gordon isn't. It must be some kind of conspiracy!

WHAT? Link that please, because I need something else to make me hate TV execs.

http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/detail/index.jsp?uuid=a210f827-8ffc-4882-834d-8fc1af7eb40c



Motherdouchebags.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 10, 2008, 08:18:36 AM
Really Journeyman wasn't very good.  It had just one trick: "watch time travel force screw some boring dude and his family"  While I admit there was some interest in what the time travel force was, not nearly enough to sit through multi-seasons.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 10, 2008, 08:26:46 AM
I disagree with what you said, but since America and douchebag TV execs do not, just imagine  :pedobear: is gigantic and standing behind you.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 10, 2008, 08:30:46 AM
There is a Master in the post-Eccleston era?

Yes, at the end of season 3, and he was pretty damn cooky. It was a good ending to another great season, even without Billie Piper.

I am having trouble getting through the, uh, second season (I don't like The Renumbering, I think it's season 28 that is the first Tennant?), not because of anything other than no one else in my house likes Who and I have lots of games to play.  I'll give it another whack now that I know there's a Master in there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 10, 2008, 08:33:22 AM
The Master's in Season 3 (I guess 29?) but Season 2's ending is really damn good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 10, 2008, 09:50:05 AM
If anyone is looking for something new to watch Psych isn't that bad, it's definitely fits the bill for being entertaining.
The shows are a bit inconsistant, but even the bad ones are better than most of what's on TV.

They're NOT good mysteries -- it's generally easy to pick out who did it from the beginning, and the "how they did it" isn't tough. I know a few people who were expecting good whodunnit TV, and were really disappointed. It's appeal is in the dialogue and characters, and it's really well done. Some really excellent casting and top-notch writing (the psych-outs are hilarious).

Then again, I'm partial to shows that throw in a lot of references (you're not expected to get them ALL!) from the 70s onward. Just as an example, there was an episode that took place at a comic book convention. Of the four possible culprits, three of them shared the same first name as one of the various Robins, which I admit not noticing first time through. The odd man out, of course, did it.

Plus, they mocked Batman and Robin harshly, if by proxy. And that movie STILL has not gotten trashed enough.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Prospero on January 10, 2008, 11:35:00 AM
I really like Psych. It is the only TV show that can consistently pull me away from computer games. The only real lull for me was the beginning of the second season where they felt like Shawn had to "lose" for three episodes at the beginning. It's like they were shooting for depth of character or something, and it was weak. Personally I watch the show to watch Shawn bullshit his way through wacky adventures, not to listen to him whine.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on January 10, 2008, 11:42:29 AM
I really like Psych. It is the only TV show that can consistently pull me away from computer games. The only real lull for me was the beginning of the second season where they felt like Shawn had to "lose" for three episodes at the beginning. It's like they were shooting for depth of character or something, and it was weak. Personally I watch the show to watch Shawn bullshit his way through wacky adventures, not to listen to him whine.
Dinosaur episode was awesome -- "Those marks are from the bite of a T-Rex!" (and being RIGHT!). I was a bit sad to see the pregnant interim chief finally have her baby, since frankly the "gigantically pregnant and thus not willing to deal with shit" aspect just worked so well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: ClydeJr on January 10, 2008, 11:52:27 AM
(http://www.yumcha.org/BSGLastSupper.jpg)

A more spoilery version (http://www.yumcha.org/bsg_last_supper.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 10, 2008, 11:57:02 AM
lol


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 10, 2008, 12:04:18 PM
[snip BSG picture]

A more spoilery version (http://www.yumcha.org/bsg_last_supper.jpg)

Making me wait a year for half a season has killed my interest in this series. It is reason #94204203572 that SciFi has pissed me off lately.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 11, 2008, 02:41:19 AM
There was some decent growth in the supporting characters (Xander, Anya, Spike),  and "The Body" is a great, great episode.  Much of the rest was pretty meh,  including Glory.

I liked Glory. The actress was good... Just something about the writing, I think. No scratch that. Silly me. It was all Dawn's fault. But I've gone over that.

Speaking of pissed off teens, I'm finally delving a little more into the Conner episodes. Not even close as bad as Dawn. Not sure where you guys are getting at there. The kid was born from two vampires, one of which killed herself to give birth to him; kidnapped by a 18th century madmen who completely warped his mind about his real father; transported into the Hell dimension, and defended his life from God knows what for 17-18 years, etc.. I'd say that he's got a right to be an emo fuckhead, just a bit.

Glad to see Wesley got some consolation after getting the royally fucked treatment of having his throat sliced and losing the waifish girl of his dreams to a thug. Lilah's a good hookup. Pretty milf-y. Though I suspect she'll eventually slice his throat too one day.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 11, 2008, 02:46:14 AM

 Though I suspect she'll eventually slice his throat too one day.


You're funny.  You're going to look back at this quote soon and laugh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 11, 2008, 05:40:12 AM
CBS is going to start playing Dexter

http://tv.ign.com/articles/843/843788p1.html


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 11, 2008, 05:43:07 AM
I'm not sure that is a good thing. Don't they have to protect the poor viewers of open channels against those things freely shown on pay TV? Won't they have to make cuts in the series?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 11, 2008, 06:49:33 AM
CBS is going to start playing Dexter

http://tv.ign.com/articles/843/843788p1.html

After they edit it each episode will be totally neutered.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 11, 2008, 06:50:15 AM
They're going to edit it, and it'll be on at 10 or 11.  It'll be funny to see what they do with Dexter's sister, since every other word out of her mouth is "Fuck".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on January 11, 2008, 04:03:38 PM
I picture something like the last part of this:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0SfMbQW3Fs


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on January 11, 2008, 08:28:42 PM
Anybody else watching American Gladiators so far?  I'm enjoying it quite a bit actually.  They do a great balance of campyness and real physical competition.  Its got a whole running man/smash TV vibe to it (with out the violent death obviously, heh).  Seen the gladiators beat the hell out of the challengers in some hilariously awesome ways, and they must have buffed the eliminator, because everybody is almost dead by the time they finish it.

The only part I don't like about it is the constant interviewing of each contestant at the start and end of every event.  I liked the original where you didn't know fuck about the contestants other than they were random_skinny_dude_in_tights_001 trying not to get smashed by giant muscle men in spandex.  Kind of helped the Smash TV feel to it, heh.  But I guess it can't be helped, but still, they need to realize that when goading these people to talk tough before each event, they end up sounded retarded half the time because they don't know what the hell to say.

But anywho, I'm liking it alot, and have a reason to watch TV again.  Anybody else watch it?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 11, 2008, 09:40:31 PM
I saw the first 2 episodes.  Every single person on it looks like an actor, and I wouldn't doubt if the whole thing was fake.

Not really wild about Thunderlips being the host, either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 11, 2008, 10:11:59 PM
It's not bad. Crush is hot and piledrived someone.

I do agree that the interviews sound like people are being fed lines and told to act like characters, and there are too many of them in general. I don't need to hear some dumbass talking about how he is a mongoose or monkey after every event.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on January 12, 2008, 07:15:44 PM
Nah, they were definitely to awkward in trying to come up with lines to be actors.  They all seem to be plausibly normal people to me (except several of them are douchebags).  Plus with some of the massive fuck ups in some of the events on the part of the contestants and the gladiators, I'm sure none of its fake.  The interviews are just annoying.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 13, 2008, 04:55:54 PM
Anyone watching Sarah Conner Chronicles?

I haven't seen the promos for it, I have no idea what the gist of the series is. The directing of the action scenes is already annoying me slightly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 13, 2008, 04:57:28 PM
I'm recording it. Probably will just watch it later in the week.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 13, 2008, 05:49:48 PM
Does *everything* these days have to be about teens?

It seems that no matter what the subject matter producers find a way to cast a bunch of good-looking but ill-fitting actors. Sorry but I can't buy a 100 pound 20-something girl as a bad ass.

If Aliens was made today it would be done with the cast of American Pie.

I'm getting sick of being asked to believe that Tara Reid is an archeologist and Denise Richards is a nuclear physicist.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 13, 2008, 06:00:20 PM
I hear ya, but it's all about appealing to the top demographic. I'm sure you know that though.

As for the 100 lb girl, are you talking about Summer Glau? I still haven't watched this to know what you're talking about, but she was cool in Firefly I thought. And no doubt why she was cast here. She was basically the Terminator there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 13, 2008, 06:59:58 PM
"You may want to put those back in the holster."  :awesome_for_real:

So, how long before the robot discovers it has REAL EMOTIONS and jumps in the sack with Emo boy?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 13, 2008, 07:02:51 PM
I'm talking about the good Terminator chick. IMDB tells me that you are right, it's Summer Glau.

Sorry but I don't buy her picking people up and smashing them into walls, nor do I understand why people from the future would send a skinny undersized brat back in time to protect them. It really strains credulity. I'm not a fan of Joss Whedon and he seems to love skinny girls who couldn't punch a hole in a paper bag playing badasses.

It's one thing if she was very quick and feral, I could maybe buy that. But Hulk-like strength? No. Yeah...I know she is a robot blah blah...

Triforcer: Yeah, this series has Emo drama written all over it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 13, 2008, 07:20:17 PM
Terminator 3 was the same way (Kristanna Loken) as was Terminator 2 (Robert Patrick, not that he was a wimp but compare to Arnold...).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 13, 2008, 07:25:36 PM
In T2 they at least made up for it with the fact that Robert Patrick did some genuinely cool shit and appeared to be technologically superior. I don't think this series has the budget to do anything similar.

Anyway in this case the person who looks weak is the good guy, which is ok. Fighting an uphill battle makes for good drama. It would probably be better if they played her as much weaker than the baddies, rather than pretty bad-ass herself, and made up some story to explain why she was the best they could do under the circumstances.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 13, 2008, 09:57:02 PM
I finished watching it. It's okay so far. It looks like they are going to be playing up the whole time travel bit a lot more in the series. There's also some weird "mysterious past (future)" thing going on with Cameron (Summer Glau's character).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on January 14, 2008, 06:11:14 AM
I think Trippy has the gist of it. I'm sure it will fall in to a whole teen angst angle, but with the time hopping, knowing that John in the future is the one who has reprogrammed some of them, etc, I'm sure there's lots of hidden story to tell.

Plus she's hot, and I always find it cool when Firefly alum show up in shows I'm interested in watching.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: murdoc on January 14, 2008, 07:26:09 AM
I like how she had a personality when she was just John's classmate, but as soon as she made herself know as a machine, that all disappeared... unless you count eating a potato chip as personality.

I found it meh, but there's nothing else on right now so I'll probably watch a few episodes. Best part about it is that the Wife wants to watch the Terminator movies again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 14, 2008, 07:40:18 AM
I like the gun that was hidden in the vault.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 14, 2008, 01:59:21 PM

 Though I suspect she'll eventually slice his throat too one day.


You're funny.  You're going to look back at this quote soon and laugh.

Ouch! Didn't see that coming.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: murdoc on January 14, 2008, 02:35:12 PM
I like the gun that was hidden in the vault.



The gun that was in multiple safety deposit boxes, but the fucking Time Machine was just sitting there in one piece :roll:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Slyfeind on January 14, 2008, 06:56:09 PM
The gun that was in multiple safety deposit boxes, but the fucking Time Machine was just sitting there in one piece :roll:

Because the gun was too big to fit in one box, silly! DUH!

Summer really pulled off the robot thing. I had no problem believing she could push over a truck, or throw Arnold's equivalent through a wall. And she's hot. Problem is, so is Sarah Connor. I don't think Sarah Connor should be hot. I think she should be a ragged warrior and a mom combined in a nearly-psychotic package. But not hot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 14, 2008, 07:20:59 PM
I recall that Linda Hamilton was considered hot in her day too, especially T2.

I never thought so myself, just saying.


Either way, I don't particularly care for seeing some ugly butch chick on tv every week. Hot is good the last time I checked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 14, 2008, 09:00:01 PM
Quick question (as someone who has had all 3 terminator movies explained to me, but I haven't seen them):  I know Skynet itself is sentient, but are the individual terminators?  I only ask to evaluate the possibility of the writers going with some shitty Angel-style conversion.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2008, 09:19:58 PM
The terminators are certainly "self-aware" if that's what you mean by "sentient". However it gets more complicated depending on which version of T2 you consider "canon". In the theatrical T2 Arnold's terminator is able to learn and adapt while in the field (learning to become more human-like) however in the original script and in the "special edition" that's on DVD the terminators are sent into the field with "read-only" memories -- i.e. they can't "learn" on their own -- unless a special switch on the CPU is manually flipped which the terminator can't do by itself which is what they do to Arnold's CPU but not before Sarah Connor tries to smash the CPU after removing it but is stopped by John.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 14, 2008, 09:22:06 PM
^^^^^
What he said

Quick question (as someone who has had all 3 terminator movies explained to me, but I haven't seen them):  I know Skynet itself is sentient, but are the individual terminators?  I only ask to evaluate the possibility of the writers going with some shitty Angel-style conversion.

There was a scene that was cut and then re-added to T2 that said all terminators have the same learning CPU but they have them basically locked down so they don't think too much on their own.  Open up the head casing flip a switch and you basically can have EMO-BOT. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 14, 2008, 09:27:09 PM
They don't appear to have emotions though.

Also Trippy, congrats on that run-on sentence. It's a doozy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 14, 2008, 09:30:40 PM
They don't appear to have emotions though.

Also Trippy, congrats on that run-on sentence. It's a doozy.

Not in the movie, but then he wasn't 'learning' for that long before he was deactivated, plus it seemed to pick up on sacrifice well enough.  Ultimately we have no idea what kinda crap they will shovel into this at any moment though so I wouldn't be surprised if they threw emotions in there too at some point.... unless it gets canceled before then. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 14, 2008, 09:36:09 PM
Ah, I see.  Thanks. 

And my actual verdict on the show: I am intrigued enough to keep watching for the time being.  Having Cameron do what she did to Enrique was either really shitty writing or very revolutionary for a prime time "good" guy. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2008, 09:38:06 PM
They don't appear to have emotions though.
They can certainly simulate emotions and Arnold's terminator developed a sense of humor by the end of the movie ("I need a vacation").


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 14, 2008, 09:43:20 PM
I recall that Linda Hamilton was considered hot in her day too, especially T2.
She was in "Beauty and the Beast" (the TV show not the Disney movie) so yes some people think so though I never found her that attractive. In T2 it was because of how buff she got (though that wasn't her doing the pullups in her ward cell).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 14, 2008, 09:52:21 PM
I don't care about it being in the vault.  I like that it because it was cool looking and because it seems a plausable cold-fussion weapon.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 15, 2008, 12:08:36 AM
And my actual verdict on the show: I am intrigued enough to keep watching for the time being.  Having Cameron do what she did to Enrique was either really shitty writing or very revolutionary for a prime time "good" guy. 
I think the writing has been pretty good so far. They've kept the storyline established in the movies and they've done a good job with the way they've answered some of the obvious questions though they are still keeping Cameron's future/past mysterious. There's obviously something special about her relationship with the future John -- i.e. she's not just some random terminator unit they sent back to the past.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on January 15, 2008, 04:12:58 AM

 Though I suspect she'll eventually slice his throat too one day.


You're funny.  You're going to look back at this quote soon and laugh.

Ouch! Didn't see that coming.

^^


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 15, 2008, 04:16:37 AM
Since those American bastards deny me my Television I try out some of the more obscure UK stuff.

Not expecting much I downloaded the pilot of Honest. That was unexpectedly funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 15, 2008, 05:33:06 AM
Since those American bastards deny me my Television I try out some of the more obscure UK stuff.

Not expecting much I downloaded the pilot of Honest. That was unexpectedly funny.

I was overseas this Christmas and caught some British Spy show.  It was very very good.  Completely 100% believable.  But I have no idea what it was called.  Revolved around MI-6 I think.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on January 15, 2008, 05:40:55 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spooks

?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on January 15, 2008, 05:52:12 AM
Was about to say that he could just go rent the show at Blockbuster or buy it at Best Buy. But BBC shows are way overpriced considering their crap production value. Anyway, yea, definitely Spooks/MI-5.

Also, Primeval starts a new "season" soon. Season is in quotes since BBC can't count either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 15, 2008, 07:41:10 AM
I recall that Linda Hamilton was considered hot in her day too, especially T2.

I never thought so myself, just saying.

Linda Hamilton was goddamn hot as hell in the T2/Beauty and the Beast days. It was a strange hot, but it was still hot.

EDIT: Also, Spooks (played as MI-5 in the US) was a damn good show the first 3 seasons. I haven't seen it since then, though. I need to Netflix it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Slyfeind on January 15, 2008, 12:18:18 PM
I wouldn't say Linda Hamilton was hot. She was pretty, but not as far as hot. In T2, she wasn't attractive at all to me. She looked like she stank of motor oil and sweat, and could kill you with a bubble gum wrapper...which I thought was cool. She was all borderline psycho and drank tequila straight from the bottle rawr etc.

But yeah, hot is preferable to a scary butch woman, although in the second part she seemed more motherly, which is something she was missing from the first part.

I'm still liking it, and hoping it keeps its stride.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 15, 2008, 01:01:36 PM
Hmmm... motherly like a midwife from System Shock 2.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 15, 2008, 01:18:15 PM
But yeah, hot is preferable to a scary butch woman, although in the second part she seemed more motherly, which is something she was missing from the first part.
She made pancakes for John in part 1 :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on January 18, 2008, 11:19:30 AM
Well, I downloaded and watched the first episode of season 2 Torchwood the other day.  In this episode James Marsters proves that there is indeed no career for him at all outside of the Buffyverse.

Next week's episode has Martha Jones from last season's Doctor Who in it. I'm not convinced that she'll be enough to save it. I mean... even Spike failed for crying out loud.

Ah well. New episode of Flash Gordon is on tonight. That will make everything better! :grin:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 18, 2008, 12:21:08 PM
I caught the premiere of Torchwood on BBC America and it seems like a decent enough show.  Gonna have to Tivo it sometime, hopefully they run repeats alot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: rattran on January 18, 2008, 12:35:52 PM
Torchwood was okay in season 1, season 2 looks to be more of the same. Nothing special.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: voodoolily on January 18, 2008, 12:47:50 PM
(http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/funny-pictures-mythbuster-cat.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 19, 2008, 06:43:34 AM
Angel: Damn, what a bummer. That's no way to end a series. It had at least one season left in it.

Terminator: So am I misunderstanding something, or are they remaining mostly stationary in LA? Is that the premise: to fight off SkyNet in one location?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on January 19, 2008, 02:05:28 PM
I wouldn't say Linda Hamilton was hot. She was pretty, but not as far as hot. In T2, she wasn't attractive at all to me. She looked like she stank of motor oil and sweat, and could kill you with a bubble gum wrapper...which I thought was cool. She was all borderline psycho and drank tequila straight from the bottle rawr etc.


See, I find that rather hot myself...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 20, 2008, 09:08:06 AM
Having watched the second episode of Terminator, I'm finding myself enjoying the show. They've gone some places I never expected, especially the time travel forward bit and the sending freedom fighters back thing. Logical choices, but something the movies seemed to shy away from. I have been extremely surprised, because I really expected to hate it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 20, 2008, 03:14:56 PM
In the movies it was implied that sending someone/thing back in time was a difficult thing to do. That's one thing they've changed in the TV show from the movies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 20, 2008, 04:04:33 PM
I don't remember that they said it was difficult in the movies.  Only that they blew up the facility after they sent Reese through so no one could follow. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 20, 2008, 04:22:41 PM
It's implied because otherwise the robots would've sent more than one terminator into the past to kill Sarah and John (and Katherine Brewster) in the movies since that's the logical thing for Skynet to do (more terminators means greater chance of success).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on January 20, 2008, 05:03:54 PM
In the first movie they didn't send any more because the Humans had just stormed the base they were using.  They just got there too late before they sent one through.  I'm guessing they didn't have many time machines laying around to replace it easily. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 20, 2008, 05:10:04 PM
Yes you keep repeating that but all that does is reinforce my point.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 20, 2008, 06:50:21 PM
The film version was always inconsistent.  Why the hell didn't Skynet send back Robert Patrick to kill Sarah Connor the first time, instead of a model that a lone human actually had a chance of beating?

Time travel stories never hold up to any sort of logic without massive amounts of hand-waving.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on January 20, 2008, 07:43:49 PM
Yeah, after all if any of the operatives sent back in time actually succeed (whether killing John Connor or ensuring that humanity defeats SkyNet) then it only makes sense that they would then swamp the past with other operatives to make sure they won, thus removing the need for them to send anyone back and creating a paradox.

Basically once you take into account that there are points farther into the future than when the terminator (or freedom fighter) gets sent back, the whole idea falls apart.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 20, 2008, 08:14:12 PM
Breaking Bad was just on AMC, and I thought it was really good.  I can't really think of any show off the top of my head like it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 20, 2008, 08:18:40 PM
It's a good show though. Stop it, you guys!

I'm just a little wait-and-see on the Sarah Conner being stationary in LA idea though. I mean, that might be a better idea storywise... You can start building a "world" that way, with lots of recurring side characters and villains, etc.. I would like that.

But then, that's not exactly the type of story I've seen from anything Terminator. Even though T1 and T2 were mostly filled with scenes in LA, they were very "mobile" stories. A lot of action done on the move. This TV series sounds like something completely different.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on January 21, 2008, 06:33:05 PM
Damnit, the Sarah O'Terminator show has me hooked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 21, 2008, 07:34:04 PM
The high school sidestory today was retarded, but overall I am still liking the show. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 21, 2008, 10:16:02 PM
What was retarded about it? Hopefully there's more of it -- that's the one part of the show where there could be more comic relief. The bits where the Terminator tried to be more human were always the funny parts of the movies.

That's just me though. As I've said a hundred times elsewhere, I only like sci-fi with a good dose of comedy.

Speaking of which... Did you say earlier that you've never seen the movies? Why?? Or rather... How??


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 22, 2008, 05:56:08 AM
Ya, the Terminator Goes to Highschool part was funny when they first started it, but then, I really didn't want it to drag on.  Good for them for throwing someone off a roof.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 22, 2008, 11:16:10 AM
I was pleasantly surprised that they let the chick take a street dive. I was expecting the typical "We must save her" shit. The Terminator being a fucking cold, calculating terminator, and Sarah agreeing with her was a pleasant switch, especially after Sara wussed out on killing the geek. I really hope they minimize the cutesy Terminator learning emotions shit. It gets very old very quick, like Data on Star Trek: TNG (to reference another thread).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on January 22, 2008, 12:21:55 PM
I thought she had a "highschool girl" program that she was running when she was looking for John @ the beginning.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 22, 2008, 12:59:18 PM
Haven't been able to get into the terminator tv show.  I would have thought that River Tam kicking ass would have been a sure hit with me, but I'm not feeling it.  I don't think I like any of the actors at all besides the terminator chick.  Plus all the timeline inconsistencies are a bitch.   


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 22, 2008, 01:06:41 PM
I think I'm watching it for Sarah Conner herself. Cool character, here and elsewhere... and the big thing missing from the last flick (among other things). Doesn't hurt that this chick is hotter than Linda Hamilton too. She'll eventually be the cool asskicker to watch this show for, not River.

Timeline... Bah.

[edit] Huh, just realized she was the chick in 300.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 22, 2008, 01:49:05 PM
I don't understand the timeline complaints.  The timeline has been in flux since the first movie.  Time travel does that.  Changing the timeline is the central plot of the second movie.

And what John understands and Sarah doesn't is: Sky.net comes into existence, not from a single event, but from a system(United States Technology and Military).  She is trying to extinguish potential starting points.  But the system is still in place and new starting points will emerge.  Stop one person from making a break through in AI, sooner or later another person is going try also.  As soon as one person does, the Military will take advantage that break through and build Sky.net.  Sky.net's timeline gets changed but its existence stays the same.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on January 22, 2008, 02:21:38 PM
I hate time travel plot devices in general, so that's probably why.  Plus it's a TV series, so it doesn't have the big budget for 'splosions to make me forget whatever the fuck stupid paradox they've just created.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 23, 2008, 06:40:19 AM
Chuck is back with two new episodes tomorrow (Thursday, 1/24).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 23, 2008, 06:50:44 AM
I'm seriously excited while simultaneously annoyed at the night switch. Are they trying to mess up viewership? And what's with two new episodes during a strike?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 23, 2008, 08:25:10 AM
I don't understand the timeline complaints.  The timeline has been in flux since the first movie.  Time travel does that.  Changing the timeline is the central plot of the second movie.

And what John understands and Sarah doesn't is: Sky.net comes into existence, not from a single event, but from a system(United States Technology and Military).  She is trying to extinguish potential starting points.  But the system is still in place and new starting points will emerge.  Stop one person from making a break through in AI, sooner or later another person is going try also.  As soon as one person does, the Military will take advantage that break through and build Sky.net.  Sky.net's timeline gets changed but its existence stays the same.

Of course, that logic may apply equally to the terminators killing John.  Its always been my theory that the point of the movies is that neither Skynet nor the humans can change anything, that time travel is only good for observation and rearranging deck chairs.  John and Sarah pop off a few programmers, Skynet still gets made.  Terminators get John, somebody else leads the resistance and gets Skynet anyway. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 23, 2008, 09:05:27 AM
Breaking Bad was just on AMC, and I thought it was really good.  I can't really think of any show off the top of my head like it.

Yeah, I watched it last night, and dug it. It didn't go like I thought it would, which was a pleasant surprise.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 23, 2008, 09:55:19 AM
I am like a year plus late, but I have really gotten into Survivorman (Discovery/Science or OLN). Les Stroud seems like a humble, likeable guy (quite unlike the other survivor show D-bag), and his voice sounds a lot like a friend of mine. I am totally addicted at this point.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on January 23, 2008, 04:17:34 PM
I love Les Stroud.

Me too.  Between that and Deadliest Catch, I could live on Discovery channel.  Literally.  Give me Discovery channel and a pocket knife and set me free in the wilds.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on January 23, 2008, 04:33:17 PM
I actually enjoy the MonsterQuest show.  There's so much unintentional humor that I have to believe it's a very suble satire on contempory urban myths.

(Dramatization)
Xenobiologist Cryptozoologist:  This video is obviously of a very large black panther,  possibly a maneater by the way he is accustomed to human presence.
Videoguy:  Maybe a large housecat.
Cat expert:  Housecat.
Panther refuge worker: Housecat.
Farmer:  I don't know what it was,  but I make sure to carry mah rifle with me at all times now!

Geldoned


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 23, 2008, 06:27:18 PM
I really hope they minimize the cutesy Terminator learning emotions shit. It gets very old very quick, like Data on Star Trek: TNG (to reference another thread).

(http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:cx3faSY4xnlNNM:http://www.oldmanmusings.)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on January 23, 2008, 08:47:40 PM
I actually enjoy the MonsterQuest show.  There's so much unintentional humor that I have to believe it's a very suble satire on contempory urban myths.

(Dramatization)
Xenobiologist:  This video is obviously of a very large black panther,  possibly a maneater by the way he is accustomed to human presence.
Videoguy:  Maybe a large housecat.
Cat expert:  Housecat.
Panther refuge worker: Housecat.
Farmer:  I don't know what it was,  but I make sure to carry mah rifle with me at all times now!

I tried watching it since I love stuff like the Loch Ness Monster and such, but its so tedious and BORING.
They can't even make a giant bird trying to fly off with some dude exciting.
Those fucks need to go back and watch Unsolved Mysteries and come round once they make an interesting topic.. INTERESTING.
As is, its like the Cryptozoological version of Al Capone's Vault only weekly.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 24, 2008, 08:00:41 AM
I like MonsterQuest too, but it seems like they are struggling to find subjects every week. It would be nice to see someone throw a bunch of money and scientific methods at Bigfoot and see what they can find. It would make better television than giant housecats and oversized birds and whatnot.


I remember a Bigfoot-centric show from a couple of years ago...had 1 season, with a female lead host/type. Can't remember the name of it to save my life though. It was decent, but needed more time/effort/money.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: pants on January 24, 2008, 01:42:45 PM
The West Wing is really good.  Its so good that I actually watched the whole Matt Santos vs Arnie Vinick televised debate, and I've never watched a real debate from start to finish.

I realise its not the most up-to-date TV news around, but just thought I'd share.  :heart:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on January 24, 2008, 02:04:29 PM
I tried watching Breaking Bad last night.

Unbearable dreck.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on January 25, 2008, 05:31:37 AM
I've started watching Flight of the Conchords on DVD recently, the inspiring story of New Zealand's fourth most popular parody folk band trying to make it big in America. I think it was on HBO, if you like your humour dry and enjoy parody songs in your shows you'll love it.

Song from the show. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmDTSQtK20c)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: hulons1 on January 25, 2008, 06:47:33 AM
"Sara wussed out on killing the geek"

Hot or not, Linda Hamilton would have put 3 in the geek's head. She would have downed a bottle of booze afterwards but the deed would have been done.

And She was hot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 25, 2008, 07:27:28 AM
I've started watching Flight of the Conchords on DVD recently, the inspiring story of New Zealand's fourth most popular parody folk band trying to make it big in America. I think it was on HBO, if you like your humour dry and enjoy parody songs in your shows you'll love it.
I tried getting the fiancee into it via the wrong method. I kept singing the 'Most Beautiful Girl' song to her. She thought it was funny (and I'm a walking parody song, so at first she thought it was an original :)) but never translated to watching the show. Now she's marking them for recording on the DVR and we're catching up.

That Monsterquest stuff reminds me of Paranormal something or other. There was one ep filmed nearby (in Syracuse), so I tuned in, because I'm a skeptical mofo. It was pretty funny. Turns out the evil spirit was some old bag that was hanging out around the house, friend of the family. Every single episode has been total nonsense. For all the people that believe in that shit, I'd like to see a single shred of evidence ever.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on January 25, 2008, 07:29:16 AM
Chuck is back with two new episodes tomorrow (Thursday, 1/24).

And how delicious they were.

I especially liked the second.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 25, 2008, 02:29:10 PM
"Robbing" the Buy More was inspired.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: voodoolily on January 25, 2008, 03:51:29 PM
Has anyone noticed how many people who had one episode on Freaks and Geeks now have totally viable careers, while the kid who played Sam has been in two series that were cancelled in one season or less?

Cameos:
Shia LaBeouf (spelling?) played the school mascot
that girl who's in Dirt (the show with Courtney Cox)
that girl who was the little sister in Election (okay, she hasn't done much since that, but still)

And also,
Seth Rogan has lots of jobs
the girl who played Lindsey has been on ER for like, a million years


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 26, 2008, 02:27:11 PM
Chuck is back with two new episodes tomorrow (Thursday, 1/24).

And how delicious they were.

I especially liked the second.

Yes. The Chuck episodes were Awesome. Especially the bits with Capt. Awesome, who is quickly becoming one of my favorite bit characters. The writer's strike needs to get done fucking soon and get this show back on the air.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 28, 2008, 06:57:24 AM
Has anyone noticed how many people who had one episode on Freaks and Geeks now have totally viable careers, while the kid who played Sam has been in two series that were cancelled in one season or less?
My fiancee loves that show and I was going to get her the DVD for xmas, but they want a bundle for some multi-DVD thing. The show was like one damned season, goddamned milking capitalist scum. Chairman Meow is watching!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on January 28, 2008, 02:41:04 PM
Has anyone noticed how many people who had one episode on Freaks and Geeks now have totally viable careers, while the kid who played Sam has been in two series that were cancelled in one season or less?

Cameos:
Shia LaBeouf (spelling?) played the school mascot
that girl who's in Dirt (the show with Courtney Cox)
that girl who was the little sister in Election (okay, she hasn't done much since that, but still)

And also,
Seth Rogan has lots of jobs
the girl who played Lindsey has been on ER for like, a million years

Hell, the tall lanky glasses kid from the show is a moderator at RPGnet.  He is a big White Wolf fanboy.  And a wussy as RPGnetters are wont to be.
He almost makes me not like the show anymore.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 28, 2008, 05:09:08 PM
Aww wtf? Terminator replaced by the State of the Union address? Hasn't Bush already fucked the country enough? :x


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on January 28, 2008, 05:18:03 PM
LAST TIME A SHOW GOT PREEMPTED BY BUSH IT WAS VERITAS.

THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 28, 2008, 06:06:24 PM
Quote from: Stray link=162.msg403035#msg403035 date=1201568948
Aww wtf? Terminator replaced by the State of the Union address? Hasn't Bush already fucked the country enough? :x

This pushed me over the edge.  I'm a communist now.   :uhrr:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on January 28, 2008, 10:00:38 PM
You were always a flaming liberal in your soft nougaty center. We just had to keep licking you.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on January 29, 2008, 04:57:26 AM
Aww wtf? Terminator replaced by the State of the Union address? Hasn't Bush already fucked the country enough? :x
Ah I was wondering why it was a repeat.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2008, 06:58:40 AM
Ah I was wondering why it was a repeat.
The SotU?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2008, 07:16:54 AM
No, the Terminator series.. They played a repeat an hour early (the first episode), and replace the State of the Union in the usual 8:00 PM timeslot. :\


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2008, 07:44:04 AM
Yeah, forgot the green.  :grin:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on January 29, 2008, 07:45:41 AM
Anyone know if they are still making the journeyman series?

write strike is still on right?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2008, 08:06:31 AM
Yeah, forgot the green.  :grin:

Oops...

Yeah, that's pretty funny. Can't believe I answered that seriously.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on January 29, 2008, 08:18:09 AM
Caught the last few minutes of the Terminator show last night while sending British trade convoys to visit Davey Jones. I was reasonably impressed. Even if I wasn't, I might still start watching it for Summer Glau. Dear lord she looked good. Apparently the director of photography feels the same; nearly every shot of her had the camera right about breast level. Now that is quality television!  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 29, 2008, 09:20:32 AM
Anyone know if they are still making the journeyman series?

write strike is still on right?

Writer's strike is still on, but Journeyman got shitcanned.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2008, 11:05:37 AM
Late night talk shows are always pretty cheesy, but I caught some of Leno's monologue last night and I think he's actually doing better material than his writers were providing. Like he was getting some of his standup timing back. Still cheesy, but you can't expect much out of late night.

Any of you actually watch the SotU or should I venture into politics? It was pretty funny, chock full o' logical inconsistencies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2008, 11:43:29 AM
Yeah, there's a SotU discussion in progress there.


I don't catch talk shows too much anymore, but I'm still a fan of Conan. Used to be better with Andy Richter though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 29, 2008, 11:59:55 AM
Why would I watch the SotU?  Also, I avoid political discussions on F13 so as to remain amicable with as many of you as possible.  Seems like I watch a lot of Spongebob, Peep, Between the Lions, and some Fairly Oddparents.

Speaking of Fairly Oddparents, they are apparently adding a fairy baby.  Death knell!  I'm cautiously optimistic that the excellent writing will support the addition of a Fairy Doo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on January 29, 2008, 12:12:27 PM
I try to avoid politics, too. Don't like getting upset over things I can't do much about. Do what you can, stay informed, and let it go. Trying to bring the fiancee around to that point of view. She wants to watch the Republican debates, I see no reason to waste my time. I won't vote Republican, and we're probably screwed if any of those guys get in.

I like watching music and science stuff, also people getting hit in the nuts (AFHV). Most of what is discussed here is lost on me because I don't watch a lot of fictional tv.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 29, 2008, 12:17:43 PM
Oh, God, how could I forget the near-daily AFHV and it's counterpart America's Funniest Pets & People.  AFP&P is top choice since the boy loves watching cats fall off of things.  I need to curtail the AFV since he whacked me in the balls accidentally this past weekend and he ran to mommy laughing as he told her all about it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on January 29, 2008, 02:15:13 PM
Oh, God, how could I forget the near-daily AFHV and it's counterpart America's Funniest Pets & People.  AFP&P is top choice since the boy loves watching cats fall off of things.  I need to curtail the AFV since he whacked me in the balls accidentally this past weekend and he ran to mommy laughing as he told her all about it.

If you're watching AFHV or AFP&P this is no less than you deserve. Sorry. You're directly responsible for the decline of Western civilization as we know it!.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on January 29, 2008, 02:32:01 PM
So, uh... Sam Raimi is working on a TV series based on Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth novels (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i062b16e707aa9991beca376ab4ce2189).



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on January 29, 2008, 02:33:03 PM
Why?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on January 29, 2008, 02:47:07 PM
Needed to wash the taste of Spider Man 3 out of his mouth?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on January 29, 2008, 02:48:54 PM
If you're watching AFHV or AFP&P this is no less than you deserve. Sorry. You're directly responsible for the decline of Western civilization as we know it!.

If I may be allowed to defend myself, I transfer blame to my four-year-old son.  I'm trying to get him interested in the Stooges rather than cats falling off of shelving.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on January 29, 2008, 03:02:20 PM
Could be cool if they cut Temple of the Winds crap and quit huping Ayn Rand's leg so hard.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2008, 03:54:17 PM
Raimi should just make a straight up comedy. He's one of the few who can be "funny" just on visuals alone.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on January 29, 2008, 04:25:11 PM
Raimi should just make a straight up comedy. He's one of the few who can be "funny" just on visuals alone.

I actually miss Xena and Hercules.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on January 29, 2008, 07:15:43 PM
The West Wing is really good.  Its so good that I actually watched the whole Matt Santos vs Arnie Vinick televised debate, and I've never watched a real debate from start to finish.

I realise its not the most up-to-date TV news around, but just thought I'd share.  :heart:


Hey, I haven't seen it. I think that should be next on my list. I'm always out of the loop when it comes to TV. I'm JUST starting to watch Lost now. Sawyer is funny.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on January 29, 2008, 08:53:00 PM
Raimi should just make a straight up comedy. He's one of the few who can be "funny" just on visuals alone.

I actually miss Xena and Hercules.   :awesome_for_real:

Yes.  Those shows reached levels of awesome not seen before or since.  I think Hercules was a hard sell to the core demographic (young men) because of all the shirtless men constantly parading around.  Although I don't think Iolaus ever oiled him up while both were sitting in a hot spring, ala Xena/Gabrielle. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on January 29, 2008, 11:11:43 PM
I too enjoyed those shows. Xena a little less because it was too serious at times, although the evil-ish chick rival (Calypso?) was both hot and crazy, which is another way of saying extra hot.

I even watched the cruddy Hercules made for TV movies, with Tawny Kitaen as his wife IIRC.

Those two shows spawned off a mess of successor that sadly all sucked. (Beast Master, Sinbad (?), one about some jungle chick, etc etc)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 06, 2008, 05:42:06 AM
So, I would like to start watching one of the following series:

- Babylon 5
- Battlestar Galactica
- Stargate SG-1 (and Atlantis)

In your opinion, which one should I choose?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on February 06, 2008, 05:52:24 AM
In that order.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on February 06, 2008, 07:26:58 AM
One and two are both great options. While Stargate has its purpose and audience, it doesn't stand up to the other two.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on February 06, 2008, 10:43:47 AM
Stay away from the Babylon 5 spin-offs, though.  So bad.

It's been a while, but I think the last 2 or 3 made-for-TV movies were completely forgettable as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 06, 2008, 04:05:37 PM
All the Stargate series are crap IMO, lowest common denominator sci-fi.

Can't go wrong with either of the other two series. I would start with B5 since it's over. But yes, avoid the movies and spinoffs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 06, 2008, 04:45:41 PM
So, I would like to start watching one of the following series:

- Babylon 5
- Battlestar Galactica
- Stargate SG-1 (and Atlantis)

In your opinion, which one should I choose?

Babylon 5 is old school scifi.  Big ideas, big storylines, sometimes really cheesy/inconsistent,  sometimes genius. 

BG is a (good) character-based drama with scifi trappings,  and a couple of great actors. 

SG1 is light, fluffy modern scifi that's entertaining and somehow you've started watching it regularly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on February 06, 2008, 05:07:25 PM
BSG is the only one I have actually watched.  (Woulda got into B5, but the DVD set costs are bullshit, just like Deep Space Nine (which has reduced to cowshit levels).)

I think its totally kickass and one of my favorite TV shows.

Some folks seem to hate the latest season but they suck.

BSG has decent allegory to modern days, cool stories, it generally doesn't get silly, its got very little forced humor or Joss Whedonesque suckass quipping (All scifi/horror quipping is shit.  GET OUT OF MY SHOWS DAMMIT.) yet its not so unbearably dark as to be an endless procession of doom and wrist slitting.

And a lot of hot chicks.  Really, really hot chicks.  Apparently the ladies get their eye candy too.  (Equal opportunity cake.)



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 06, 2008, 05:13:04 PM
You could also watch Space: Above and Beyond, a personal favorite of mine.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on February 06, 2008, 05:21:16 PM
Speaking of Fairly Oddparents, they are apparently adding a fairy baby.  Death knell!  I'm cautiously optimistic that the excellent writing will support the addition of a Fairy Doo.

I don't know how I feel about that!  I haven't watched the show in a couple of years but it's topnotch comedy.  Going to have to start watching it again.

(My son is now at the fascinated with ratings age.  If it's rated R, he wants to see it. Or thinks he does.  He's watching Sarah Connor Chronicles but that's about it for the TV14 shows for him.  He's not quite ready for Heroes or Lost.)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on February 06, 2008, 05:22:19 PM
BSG has decent allegory to modern days, cool stories, it generally doesn't get silly, its got very little forced humor or Joss Whedonesque suckass quipping (All scifi/horror quipping is shit.  GET OUT OF MY SHOWS DAMMIT.) yet its not so unbearably dark as to be an endless procession of doom and wrist slitting.

Are you serious?  I love Joss Whedonesque quipping.   LOVE IT.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on February 06, 2008, 05:29:35 PM
How can you mention hercules and xena and forget to mention Cleopatra 2525 and Jack of all Trades?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=4YmnG2pzVgQ

Best opening song EVAR.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 06, 2008, 05:30:37 PM
I have to admit I did watch Cleopatra 2525, and yes the theme song was awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 06, 2008, 06:20:03 PM
You could also watch Space: Above and Beyond, a personal favorite of mine.

My favorite was Farscape,  so obviously take anything I say with a grain of salt. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 06, 2008, 06:21:52 PM
You're off the team.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 06, 2008, 07:09:23 PM
Here, you linked the wrong one.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_VNsjjYRgjc&feature=related

 :awesome_for_real:

Cleo had an interesting villian but I really preferred Jack.  No big surprise that the one with the half-naked bimbos got the full half hour slot, though.  :heartbreak:


Speaking of B5 I got season 1 & 2 for x-mas and have been watching them during the days Netflix is in transit.  Watching seaon 1 again I'm trying to remember why I liked Sinclair so much and was so ticked when they brought in Sheridan.  Of course, as JMS points out in the comentary, part of that is the forced resolution to some crisis in every episode but man, that guy was almost hammier than Shatner.

Still, great to watch it all again knowing the whole story and picking up stuff I'd missed/ forgotten.  The major-arc episodes stand out as so much better because of that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 06, 2008, 07:13:26 PM
Personally I hated Sinclair. Something about his acting just rubbed me the wrong way.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on February 06, 2008, 07:25:07 PM
BSG has decent allegory to modern days, cool stories, it generally doesn't get silly, its got very little forced humor or Joss Whedonesque suckass quipping (All scifi/horror quipping is shit.  GET OUT OF MY SHOWS DAMMIT.) yet its not so unbearably dark as to be an endless procession of doom and wrist slitting.

Are you serious?  I love Joss Whedonesque quipping.   LOVE IT.

I'm a huge massive nerd of levels heretofore unseen outside of the unwashed, LARP, pocket protector wearing kind, yet I utterly despise everything Joss Whedon has ever done.  (Outside of Firefly which I have not watched and generally refuse to, since I already know its quipland in space.)  Hated Buffy, hated Angel more since it could have been good if they stopped with the quippy shit, hated Alien Resurrection outside of Ron Perlman, and hated his X Men run. (First 2 trades.  I wasn't subjecting myself to any more of that early 80s throwback ass.)

I know its geek heresy but I just don't like anything the man has done.  He seems like a nice guy and all, I just find his stuff to be shit.

And that every Brownshirt needs to be slapped in the face with Ron Jeremy's wang.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 06, 2008, 07:31:04 PM
You're off the team.

 :cry:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 06, 2008, 07:32:52 PM
I didn't even know those shows were supposed to be geeky. The people who were trying to get me into Buffy for years weren't anything like that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 06, 2008, 08:26:57 PM
Probably the difference between people who simply liked Buffy and people who are Whedonophiles.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on February 06, 2008, 09:01:33 PM
So, I would like to start watching one of the following series:

- Babylon 5
- Battlestar Galactica
- Stargate SG-1 (and Atlantis)

In your opinion, which one should I choose?
B5: Hasn't aged well -- the cheese factor and special effects just don't work as well. Still, it kicked off multi-season arcs and real story telling in sci-fi, even if they had to do shit filler episodes 70% of the time the first few seasons. (Fucking Grey 17 Is Missing? Fuck you, Grey 17 and your lame ass monster of the week).

BG: Sad to say, only seen the miniseries. Just picked up the first season on DVD and have been assured it's the bee's knees.

SG-1: It's "planet of the week" shit. I like it a lot, but it's a lot like ST:TNG -- they dabble in arcs, tend to have a lot of reoccuring villians and problems, and there's generally an attempt made to address some of the issues involved. In the end, though, they don't push it too far -- it's light, with occasional really good episodes. The production values, especially in later seasons, are pretty high and I've been told they took rather extreme steps to get the military side of it fairly believable. (The Air Force has a liason with them, and the SG-1 producers won some sort of award for realistic and positive potrayal of the US Air Force.). It's not great, but it's solid. Their version of Groundhog Day (time loop) was fucking awesome, though. :)

There's also Farscape. It's-- fuck if I can describe it. Chaotic sci-fi soap opera in a universe that looks like a cross between the Muppets and a BDSM coinventio? Once you get past the muppets,(no mean feat, I admit) it's just plain old unique. I liked it, once I figured out what the hell was going on. Scorpius was one heck of a great villian, though. I never did figure out who --- or what -- that guy was working for.

I have a hard time recommending that one, because it's one of those "like it or hate it" type of shows, and damned if I can figure out what makes people feel either way.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 06, 2008, 09:21:06 PM
Quote
a universe that looks like a cross between the Muppets and a BDSM coinventio?

Heh. This made me giggle.

There is some great cleavage on that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Morat20 on February 06, 2008, 10:15:54 PM
Quote
a universe that looks like a cross between the Muppets and a BDSM coinventio?

Heh. This made me giggle.

There is some great cleavage on that show.
I admit, I was there for Aeryn Sun in leather pants. Oddly, my wife appeared to be watching it for John Chricton in leather pants. I don't get the appeal myself. :)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 07, 2008, 04:02:30 AM
Scorpius was one heck of a great villian, though. I never did figure out who --- or what -- that guy was working for.

Scorpy was great, yes indeed.  As to who he was working for.  Like all great villains: Himself.

Chiana was always the one that did it for me. Rawr.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 07, 2008, 04:32:55 AM
Couldn't get past the henson look myself.. And the one guy that wasnt in lousy makeup (the lead character i guess?) was a dork.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on February 07, 2008, 06:08:51 AM
I feel sad that I made my first reply without bringing up Farscape. I still haven't quite managed to get every episode, but if you watch them in order to keep the story straight, its a great show. You will eventually get past its muppetness. The only other show I can think of that had a similar feel to Farscape would be Lexx, which was interesting yet odd.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 07, 2008, 08:25:53 AM
Thank you guys for the comments ! By the way, yesterday night I watched the Battlestar Galactica 2003 mini series (or huge pilot, if you want) and I liked it: it has a certain Wing Commander-esque (and thus, fricking awesome) feeling to it, especially when you see the ships in the launch hangar, some of the personalities aboard the Battlestar and so on.

And of course, just in time for the mini-series finale I decided Sharon "Boomer" Valerii was my favorite character, and well, you know...:P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 07, 2008, 09:22:48 AM
The only other show I can think of that had a similar feel to Farscape would be Lexx, which was interesting yet odd.

I never bring up Lexx, because there's always someone who'll give you, "so you're a pervert then," responses.  I thought it was a great, fun show with some interesting characterizations.  Plus it added-in Rutger Hauer towards the end, so win.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: JWIV on February 07, 2008, 09:31:21 AM
The only other show I can think of that had a similar feel to Farscape would be Lexx, which was interesting yet odd.

I never bring up Lexx, because there's always someone who'll give you, "so you're a pervert then," responses.  I thought it was a great, fun show with some interesting characterizations.  Plus it added-in Rutger Hauer towards the end, so win.

The movies were fun - the tv series however was complete rubbish.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 07, 2008, 09:33:56 AM
Lexx the series was just geek wank fantasy pandering of the worst kind. It needed to be a straight to DVD softcore pr0n series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 07, 2008, 09:40:18 AM
See what I mean, Bunk?   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 07, 2008, 09:46:52 AM
I didn't call you a perv for watching it.

The writers, though? Complete fucking  :pedobear:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on February 07, 2008, 10:14:47 AM
Couldn't get past the henson look myself.. And the one guy that wasnt in lousy makeup (the lead character i guess?) was a dork.

Crichton is pretty annoying protagonist for about the first 2 seasons of the show.  He's almost just completely unlikable in that time frame. I find it hard to enjoy shows where the protagonist is someone you want to clobber with a lead pipe. 

However, the show increases dramatically in quality in around mid to end point of the second season. I had been told this and I'm not sure I would have stuck it out if I hadn't known.   Once the momentum starts going on the show it really moves at a nice pace and the story line is ultimately rewarding, despite a few WTF moments in the wrap up miniseries & last few shows of the regular series.  The only other major issue I have is that there's plenty of filler episodes that cover the standard sci-fi schtick and those are generally poorly executed. 

Not a show I'd recommend to anyone, you really have to be willing to deal with the show finding itself for what isn't a trivial amount of time. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on February 07, 2008, 10:16:56 AM
Lexx the series was just geek wank fantasy pandering of the worst kind. It needed to be a straight to DVD softcore pr0n series.

Prince is one of my all-time top five TV villains.  That man was money. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on February 07, 2008, 02:18:42 PM
Thank you guys for the comments ! By the way, yesterday night I watched the Battlestar Galactica 2003 mini series (or huge pilot, if you want) and I liked it: it has a certain Wing Commander-esque (and thus, fricking awesome) feeling to it, especially when you see the ships in the launch hangar, some of the personalities aboard the Battlestar and so on.

And of course, just in time for the mini-series finale I decided Sharon "Boomer" Valerii was my favorite character, and well, you know...:P

Just keep watching.  Just keep watching.   :nda:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on February 07, 2008, 02:37:59 PM
Lexx the series was just geek wank fantasy pandering of the worst kind. It needed to be a straight to DVD softcore pr0n series.

Lexx was a German/Canadian produced series.  As we all know from these boards,  the only thing more perverse than a German is a Canadian.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2008, 02:50:33 PM
Prison Break is Awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 07, 2008, 03:06:00 PM
Has it gotten better? S1 was very cool, then S2 sucked hard and I got bored with it and only watched every few weeks.  (Surprisingly,  I was able to keep-up with the complex twists.  :awesome_for_real:)  I started watching S3 and got annoyed/ bored around the time they chopped-off Sarah's head because the actress realized the show wasn't going anywhere and haven't really watched since.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2008, 03:08:18 PM
Boxed Set.  Series One.  I'm in the UK.

Oh and thanks for the spoiler.

 :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 07, 2008, 03:20:47 PM
Fuck, sorry.  I thought you were picking it up on Torrent or something.

You don't want to watch after S1 anyway.  Really, I'm not kidding here.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2008, 03:39:05 PM
Don't sweat it.  While I'd been avoiding specifics, the general suckiness of 3 was being made clear everywhere.

Season one (of which I just finished the last episode) was really, really worthwhile TV.  It did, however, have major flaws in that, to my mind, the 'intrigue' stuff I quite literally didn't give a fuck about.

However, it did get you invested in the Characterisation to the point I am now tempted (despite it being midnight here) to break open the seal on box 2 and have a look.

Damn my wife for her infernal presentage !


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Righ on February 07, 2008, 05:17:16 PM
Strike over. (http://www.cnbc.com/id/23057002)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 07, 2008, 05:35:35 PM
The problem with Prison Break is that you can only build up to the break for so long, and once it occurs the show is logically over. They broke out or died trying - the end.

It's the kind of thing that should probably run for a season or two then hit a clear end. Unfortunately the ratings were such that they'll keep it going even though the original concept has been lost.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 07, 2008, 05:43:13 PM
Strike over. (http://www.cnbc.com/id/23057002)

Good.

Now please you "Lost" crew: move your ass back to Hawaii, asap. kthxbye.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 07, 2008, 08:02:21 PM
Lost has been showing new episodes.  I guess they have some stashed away.  Of course, it does seem very much as if they've given up the ghost on resolving anything.  I don't think it'll last it's projected ending in 2010, even with the decrease in the number of episodes.  There's too many wandering plots to fix at this point, I think.  I gave up on trying to figure anything out.  I just watch it to see what Locke does next, really.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 07, 2008, 08:11:00 PM
They admitted that they make up the story as they go along and that they don't have resolutions in mind. They also said (they being writers) that the numbers mean nothing and that's the entire explanation.

I watch both Project Runway and Make me a Supermodel. (Cue VDL calling me a faggot) Am I alone there? Also I'm in love with Holly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 07, 2008, 08:12:19 PM
My wife and I watch Project Runway. I'll one-up you by saying that I also watch What Not to Wear with the missus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 07, 2008, 08:15:00 PM
Holly?  From Red Dwarf?  I'm confused again maybe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on February 07, 2008, 08:37:53 PM
Holly from Make Me a Supermodel.

http://www.bravotv.com/Make_Me_A_Supermodel/season/1/photos/models.php?model=holly

I like the reality shows like Project Runway and Top Chef because I feel like I'm learning a little about something vaguely interesting. Err...I mean yes...my girlfriend forces me to watch this crap against my will...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 07, 2008, 09:10:45 PM
Top Chef is great food porn.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on February 07, 2008, 09:11:36 PM
I watch Project Runway with my wife.  As a rule I don't watch reality TV because I think it's stupid crap, but my wife likes it when I watch it with her. The show isn't totally devoid of entertainment and they try not to focus on the stupid interpersonal drama.

Plus, I can always just play on my iphone or laptop through most of the show and it still counts to her as watching it as long as I catch the runway section.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 07, 2008, 09:18:29 PM
I thought the flaming queens having to dress the WWE Divas last night was comedy gold on several levels.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 08, 2008, 04:45:16 AM
They admitted that they make up the story as they go along and that they don't have resolutions in mind. They also said (they being writers) that the numbers mean nothing and that's the entire explanation.
That's what upsets me the most about Lost, knowing that the ending is going to be absolutely terrible.  There is no way they can explain half the stuff they've done so it's either going to be unresolved, have a copout ending (Aliens! It was all a bad dream Jack was having!) or some bullshit nebulous end in which we're supposed to "resolve it ourselves".  Most likely the latter.

You just have to enjoy the ride and try not to worry about the brick wall at the end of the road.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on February 08, 2008, 04:54:35 AM
Next you'll be telling me you didn't enjoy the last episode of Quantum Leap.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 08, 2008, 06:08:01 AM
Quote from: Eisner
Eisner did not elaborate on terms of the agreement. He said he expects most of the media companies affected by the strike to have "small" write-downs as a result of the deal. Eisner said the deal was struck last Friday.

As a result of studio cutbacks, however, many of the writers who went on strike are unlikely to return to the same big-money contracts they'd had as individuals with the studios, Eisner said.
I hate businessmen. Disneycorp...ahh how I loved Disney World when I was a kid, a land of magic. Didn't realize the magic was necromancy.

(I was a Warner Bros kid, anyway)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 08, 2008, 09:05:48 AM
Next you'll be telling me you didn't enjoy the last episode of Quantum Leap.

Wait a sec, you did?  "Sorry bout your luck, you get to help Al but you're fucked forever. Continue jumping."  Seriously?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on February 08, 2008, 11:53:09 AM
Lost promised they'd tie up all the loose ends.  Instead, we get more.

I want to know about the polar bears.  Both of them.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 08, 2008, 11:56:38 AM
They promised they'd tie up all the loose ends by 2010. We're only 2 episodes into the new season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on February 08, 2008, 11:59:02 AM
This remote island has more people going through it than grand central station.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 08, 2008, 12:12:29 PM
I just started watching it. Lucky me, I guess. I haven't seen anything too unexplainable. Still in the beginning of the second season. Sawyer's still my favorite character. Michael's an insufferable asshole.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on February 08, 2008, 12:13:17 PM
They promised they'd tie up all the loose ends by 2010. We're only 2 episodes into the new season.

You are the perfect MOG player.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 08, 2008, 01:41:32 PM
And yet I'm not playing any MMOG's. Fancy that.

No, I just haven't seen anything in the show yet that makes me go OMGZHATE!1! While I can see where other people might get pissed at the show, I still enjoy it. I enjoy the characters, the interaction, and the mystery which yes, might never be explained to my satisfaction.

I also liked the last episode of Seinfeld and hated Buffy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 08, 2008, 01:57:32 PM
I want to know about the polar bears.  Both of them.
They sort of explained those in season three.  The sentient cloud of black smoke however... no, not yet, and I'm not holding my breath either.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 08, 2008, 02:16:49 PM
Don't worry folks.

The Writers of Lost have a VISION  :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on February 08, 2008, 02:43:29 PM
You guys are missing the point.

The Lawnmowerman has joined the cast.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 08, 2008, 03:19:02 PM
/rabid fanboi mode -on

But seriously: I started watching Lost last year when my ex-girlfriend gave me the Season 1 box set as a birthday gift.

The writing, the pace, the characterization, everything is just on a superior level compared to any other TV show out there. Maybe it's the greatest series of all time, seriously (Before Lost, my favorite ones were Twin Peaks and Chris Carter's Millennium)

Of course it also comes down to personal tastes with the plot, the setting and so on, but the complexity is amazing. Most of all, I like how coherent they managed to stay throughout the entire three seasons (and counting). While there are surely mysteries they created on the run, from what I understand they have a clear, big picture in mind they are following.

Or, maybe, it's just the magic turtle.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 08, 2008, 03:25:28 PM
I don't think it's that great. Good, but not greatest. Three's Company is the greatest series of all time, I think.  :-P

One thing I don't like about Lost is how unreasonable/impatient/generally immature and shitty some of the characters get when they have a conflict of some sort. Like when Walt was kidnapped from Michael, Michael just started going off on everyone else. Like it was their fault. Jin is kind of the same way when he has a problem. Also, the pregnant girl... Total psycho bitch for the most part. Charlie's a little more chilled out, but he gets pretty unreasonable too.

Which brings me to Sawyer... If anyone has a reason to be a fussy bitch, it's him. Instead, he's just a dick, and laughing his ass off at everybody else. I like that.

[edit] Which is to say, I don't know anybody so unreasonable like that. So to me, it's bad writing.

I know people like Sawyer however.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: AcidCat on February 08, 2008, 03:39:53 PM
Lost is the only show I watch. Like Lucas I was also a big fan of Twin Peaks, but that magic really only lasted one season, the second turned to crap. Lost has already lasted quite a bit longer and shows no signs of jumping the shark. Right now the main weakness of the show is just - too many characters, and not enough time to spend with all of them -  and they keep adding more. It's like, Desmond has hardly said anything yet this season - where's his future vision right now when we need it? Anyway that's just a matter of being patient and just waiting for them to get around to focusing on that character again. I'm not at all concerned about how the show will end, I'm just enjoying the ride.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on February 08, 2008, 08:09:21 PM
I want to know about the polar bears.  Both of them.
They sort of explained those in season three.  The sentient cloud of black smoke however... no, not yet, and I'm not holding my breath either.

So how does the polar bear skeleton with the Dharma tag that's found at the archaeological dig in Tunisia fit into that explanation?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: AcidCat on February 08, 2008, 08:51:23 PM
I want to know about the polar bears.  Both of them.
They sort of explained those in season three.  The sentient cloud of black smoke however... no, not yet, and I'm not holding my breath either.

So how does the polar bear skeleton with the Dharma tag that's found at the archaeological dig in Tunisia fit into that explanation?

It just means that there was a Dharma facility there at some point. Beyond that - who knows? The mystery is half the fun. It's not a show for people that want everything to make sense within one episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 09, 2008, 03:01:55 AM
Yep, I agree. The "journey" so far has been great. Regarding the ending, I just hope is coherent with what they have been showing for three seasons and with what they will show in the next three (counting the fourth one as well).

The Dharma Initiative dabbled in various scientific experiments: they could have created a facility in Tunisia, or maybe it's the result of a teleportation experiment. Anyways, what's more interesting about that scene, is the reaction of the newly introduced antropologist character (Charlotte) : when she discovers the Dharma Logo she's actually happy, suggesting that finding traces of the Initiative was her primary purpose.
-----

Finally, the pace of this fourth season has quite increased. While they keep adding more "edges" (secrets) they also make events "happen" faster.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 09, 2008, 05:44:33 AM
I guess they increased the pace because they've cut the number of episodes and have given a set time to end.  I don't mind some mysteries remaining mysteries but not really in this sort of show.  It might be interesting and the writing might be okay (I don't think it's any great shakes, myself) but to lose control over your story like that just seems amateur, doesn't it?  I think I watch more to see how much the writers are going screw up the story (I'm not sure "story" is the right word) they have now and how many new plots they'll introduce, never to be resolved.  The show is a bit of a train wreck.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rendakor on February 09, 2008, 08:44:09 AM
Way too many new characters in Lost this season. I hate Miles already. Needs more Sawyer, also needs more Sayid. I don't remember any explanation for the polar bears; someone PM me with it if its spoilerific?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on February 09, 2008, 10:45:43 AM
There are a lot of rumors that they plan to produce 3-6 more LOST episodes this season:

http://www.collider.com/entertainment/tv/article.asp/aid/6890/tcid/1
http://www.docarzt.com/lost-news/the-strike-is-most-definitely.php


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 09, 2008, 01:37:29 PM
I don't remember any explanation for the polar bears; someone PM me with it if its spoilerific?
Well I'm just going from memory here, it's only a spoiler if you haven't watched the third season.  In black: The Dharma research facility on the smaller island had various experiments running.  One was a modified skinner box (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinner_box) but using the polar bears instead of rats.  They were kept in the same two cages that they used to lock up Sawyer and Kate.  I assume they were released onto the other island for some reason.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 09, 2008, 02:07:12 PM
Sawyer calling Locke "Colonel Kurtz" was one of the funnier things I've seen on TV for a while.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rendakor on February 10, 2008, 08:38:19 AM
Ohh yea, thanks Miasmic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on February 11, 2008, 07:16:29 AM
On Extreme Makeover: Home Edition last night they put  a terracotta warrior in the guy's bedroom. How fucking cool is that?

Also, it's probably the best show ever made because it's doing shit the government should probably be doing for guys like that, lost his leg in Iraq, died twice, wife left him a year after he got home, raising his 4 kids in a shithole of a house that makes my ghetto apartment look palatial. I shop at Sears because of that show, it's the best advertising in the world. Only wish every network and retail outlet would start up a similar show.

Ok, back to Lost.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: croaker69 on February 11, 2008, 07:34:16 AM
On Extreme Makeover: Home Edition last night they put  a terracotta warrior in the guy's bedroom. How fucking cool is that?

Also, it's probably the best show ever made because it's doing shit the government should probably be doing for guys like that, lost his leg in Iraq, died twice, wife left him a year after he got home, raising his 4 kids in a shithole of a house that makes my ghetto apartment look palatial. I shop at Sears because of that show, it's the best advertising in the world. Only wish every network and retail outlet would start up a similar show.

Ok, back to Lost.

You sure this has nothing to do with Lost?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 11, 2008, 03:09:16 PM
A guide to what could happen to your show due to the strike. (http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/strike-fallout-a-complete-guide-to-how-your-favorite-shows-are-affected/)  They might be cutting lost down to 13 episodes from 16.  I don't know how they would do that unless they extend the next season though, this isn't really a show where you can just cut three episodes worth of plot...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on February 11, 2008, 03:33:37 PM
A guide to what could happen to your show due to the strike. (http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/strike-fallout-a-complete-guide-to-how-your-favorite-shows-are-affected/)  They might be cutting lost down to 13 episodes from 16.  I don't know how they would do that unless they extend the next season though, this isn't really a show where you can just cut three episodes worth of plot...

Everything I've read tells me they need more of this and focusing on what they have going instead of adding new characters, could be the perfect thing for them :P



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 11, 2008, 05:19:54 PM
I'm not worried about the new characters, judging by what they have done to them in past seasons they are probably all red shirts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 11, 2008, 05:30:45 PM
Depends on how many actors get popped for DUI while filming, I imagine.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on February 11, 2008, 07:08:01 PM
So, there was a Jericho marathon this weekend, which I DVR'd (wifes dead mother was a fan).  I am a huge fan of post apoc; why not check it out?


Holy shit, this show is the bomb.  It grabbed me like no other show since BSG.  Check it out, 4 serious.


And please, no spoilers.  I am only 14 episodes or so in.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on February 12, 2008, 12:42:21 AM
Flash Gordon ended it's season on a high note last Friday. Flash and the Gang defeated the Evil Ming and he was executed.

Or was he!!!11!  :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on February 12, 2008, 05:06:03 AM
I'm pretty sure the deviant brother is going to be evil now, if ming comes back it won't be a major uprising, maybe a minor annoyance and a small 1-3 episode plotline.  Them being stuck on mongo could make the next season interesting though, it's better that way anyways, their earth plotlines sucked ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on February 12, 2008, 05:50:47 AM
Yeah, I was getting the evil vibe from the deviant brother too. Still, you just can't have Flash Gordon without Ming the Merciless. They've taken enough liberties with the mythology. Ming going away permanently would be too much even for me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 12, 2008, 08:44:12 AM
I'm pretty sure Flash Gordon got shitcanned. There will be no next season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on February 12, 2008, 09:04:48 AM
You are wrong, wrong, wrong. A quality show like Flash Gordon could never be cancelled. That is strictly the fate of lesser shows like Journeyman. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on February 14, 2008, 01:16:37 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/TV/02/14/tv.24delay.ap/index.html

REVENGEANCEFUL.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: sigil on February 14, 2008, 04:15:13 PM
Jericho was one of my faves, once they tightened up the plot  in the second half.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on February 14, 2008, 06:49:06 PM
So... tonight's Lost plot twist:


(http://galleryhidden.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/12/17/badsanta1.jpg)

Are you fucking with me?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 15, 2008, 01:05:41 AM
I've finally caught up to the current eps. Season 3 was the shit, but I'm having a hard time getting into 4 so far. Not sure what you mean about plot twist. I don't even know wtf the plot is to begin with.

Here's hoping Michael makes some kind of re-appearance soon.. So someone can kill his dumb ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 15, 2008, 08:53:38 AM
I dug Lost and the plot twist. Not necessarily because it made sense, but because it was unexpected but not so crazy that I couldn't believe it based on the characters involved.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 15, 2008, 08:55:16 AM
Wait.. What plot twist? I'm actually confused here. The entire show is a freakin plot twist.  :-P

Are you talking about Ben and Sayid?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 15, 2008, 09:01:05 AM
That's what I'm talking about.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 15, 2008, 09:08:26 AM
Ah k... I'm not surprised at all is what I'm saying, I guess. I can't rely on anything really. Except the general portrayal of the characters -- Jack's a leader, Sawyer's a dick, Locke's a kook, Desmond says "Brutha" a lot, etc.. Other than that, shit keeps on twisting and changing. Even the main plot -- getting off the island -- even that is a bad idea now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on February 15, 2008, 09:28:55 AM
Jack's a leader

Can't really agree there. Jack was a lousy leader through the whole series.


Wasn't THAT surprised by the Sayid/Ben twist. The way they explained it made sense. Sayid is not really squeamish, and if he does it to protect the other survivors, he'll not lose much sleep over killing people. The only question is if Ben plays him or not.

Edit: Whole, not hole


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 15, 2008, 09:37:03 AM
The only question is if Ben plays him or not.

Well, that would be Ben's "reliable character trait", wouldn't it? Ben is most definitely playing Sayid. It's just a question of how.




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on February 15, 2008, 01:33:55 PM
Forget all that, I just want to engage in speculation about whether McNulty is about to have a meltdown on The Wire.  He hesitated at the end of episode 6 and I think his conscience finally surfaced. And the next episode is directed by his actor, Dominic West.

Also the city desk editor Gus Haynes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Haynes) is one of the most accurate portrayals of a newsroom role I've seen on film. The actor has done his research.

Trivia: the actor playing journalist Alma Gutierrez is married in real life to the actor who used to play D'Angelo Barksdale.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 15, 2008, 03:15:39 PM

Also the city desk editor Gus Haynes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Haynes) is one of the most accurate portrayals of a newsroom role I've seen on film. The actor has done his research.


That's Clark Johnson. He was great on Homocide and has directed some great episodes of The Wire, The Shield and other shows. He directed the final eps for both those series in fact. I can't wait to see them.  I want to see me some Omar kicking ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 15, 2008, 04:50:53 PM

Also the city desk editor Gus Haynes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Haynes) is one of the most accurate portrayals of a newsroom role I've seen on film. The actor has done his research.


That's Clark Johnson. He was great on Homocide and has directed some great episodes of The Wire, The Shield and other shows. He directed the final eps for both those series in fact. I can't wait to see them.  I want to see me some Omar kicking ass.
I really like that guy too, I've never seen a real news room but that guy just screams it he's taken to the role so well.

McNulty has always been an asshole, and not the kind you love to hate either, he's just an asshole.  Now that he's gone nuts, I bet he gets killed in this final season, either that or absolutely disgraced, thrown off the force and possibly jailed himself.

I'm thinking Carcetti might get taken out too...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on February 15, 2008, 08:28:53 PM

Also the city desk editor Gus Haynes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Haynes) is one of the most accurate portrayals of a newsroom role I've seen on film. The actor has done his research.


That's Clark Johnson. He was great on Homocide and has directed some great episodes of The Wire, The Shield and other shows. He directed the final eps for both those series in fact. I can't wait to see them.  I want to see me some Omar kicking ass.

Turns out he directed the first episode of The Wire in season 1, and will be director of the final episode of the Wire in the final season, and now he is also one of the best actors in it. What a legend.

McNulty has always been an asshole, and not the kind you love to hate either, he's just an asshole.  Now that he's gone nuts, I bet he gets killed in this final season, either that or absolutely disgraced, thrown off the force and possibly jailed himself.

I'm thinking Carcetti might get taken out too...

Good theories - yes I think the only way out is for McNulty to die. Hopefully at the hands of Marlo, Chris and Snoop, recorded on a wire.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Velorath on February 17, 2008, 03:22:25 PM
This is the first person I've seen speak out against the writers strike settlement.  Maybe it should be no surprise that it's Harlan Ellison, who has always been one to let people know when something pisses him off.

Quote
HARLAN ELLISON ON THE WRITERS STRIKE SETTLEMENT

YOU HAVE MY PERMISSION TO RE-POST THIS ANYWHERE:

Creds: got here in 1962, written for just about everybody, won the Writers Guild Award four times for solo work, sat on the WGAw Board twice, worked on negotiating committees, and was out on the picket lines with my NICK COUNTER SLEEPS WITH THE FISHE$$$ sign. You may have heard my name. I am a Union guy, I am a Guild guy, I am loyal. I fuckin’ LOVE the Guild.

And I voted NO on accepting this deal.

My reasons are good, and they are plentiful; Patric Verrone will be saddened by what I am about to say; long-time friends will shake their heads; but this I say without equivocation…

THEY BEAT US LIKE A YELLOW DOG. IT IS A SHIT DEAL. We finally got a timorous generation that has never had to strike, to get their asses out there, and we had to put up with the usual cowardly spineless babbling horse’s asses who kept mumbling “lessgo bac’ta work” over and over, as if it would make them one iota a better writer. But after months on the line, and them finally bouncing that pus-sucking dipthong Nick Counter, we rushed headlong into a shabby, scabrous, underfed shovelfulla shit clutched to the affections of toss-in-the-towel summer soldiers trembling before the Awe of the Alliance.

My Guild did what it did in 1988. It trembled and sold us out. It gave away the EXACT co-terminus expiration date with SAG for some bullshit short-line substitute; it got us no more control of our words; it sneak-abandoned the animator and reality beanfield hands before anyone even forced it on them; it made nice so no one would think we were meanies; it let the Alliance play us like the village idiot. The WGAw folded like a Texaco Road Map from back in the day.

And I am ashamed of this Guild, as I was when Shavelson was the prexy, and we wasted our efforts and lost out on technology that we had to strike for THIS time. 17 days of streaming tv!!!????? Geezus, you bleating wimps, why not just turn over your old granny for gang-rape?

You deserve all the opprobrium you get. While this nutty festschrift of demented pleasure at being allowed to go back to work in the rice paddy is filling your cowardly hearts with joy and relief that the grips and the staff at the Ivy and street sweepers won’t be saying nasty shit behind your back, remember this:

You are their bitches. They outslugged you, outthought you, outmaneuvered you; and in the end you ripped off your pants, painted yer asses blue, and said yes sir, may I have another.

Please excuse my temerity. I’m just a sad old man who has fallen among Quislings, Turncoats, Hacks and Cowards.

I must go now to whoops. My gorge has become buoyant.

Respectfully, Yr. Pal, Harlan Ellison


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on February 17, 2008, 04:38:38 PM
Ah, Ellison is one of those "if we don't get everything we wanted, exactly, we betrayed the cause of unionism forever to the Man" types.  Noninsane people realize that compromises are usually necessary.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 17, 2008, 07:26:33 PM
As always, Ellison is a bag of dick. The deal ain't perfect, but from what I could understand from the reading I did on the deal, it was as decent as it was going to get.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on February 17, 2008, 07:41:44 PM
Knight Rider was actually pretty decent, albeit a completely predictable plot.  But then it's fucking Knight Rider, I'm not looking for depth and complexity in it.    I also got a kick out of the throw-back references to the old show and the 'cameo' by the original K.I.T.T. as well.  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 18, 2008, 08:02:29 AM
I almost never watched television when I was a kid.  In fact, until we moved to the US several years ago, I didn't watch much.  I guess I missed most of these TV shows and films that are re-makes of originals.  I guess the nostalgia must make them better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 18, 2008, 08:12:29 AM
I'm practically the "Cable Guy". Heh. It's kind of pathetic actually. My parents put a tv in my room when I was real young, so I already had a bad schedule in my elementary years, staying up late watching all kinds of crap.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 18, 2008, 09:26:03 AM
If I wasn't in school, I was outside.  I would have been outside 24/7 if allowed.  I only stayed in when forced... like if there was a severe electrical storm or something.  It was only as an adult that I became mushroom-like. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 18, 2008, 09:28:40 AM
I spent a lot of time outside too! Got the scars to prove it.  :grin:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on February 18, 2008, 12:41:59 PM
KR was lackluster like Bionic Woman.  Sci Fi = buzzword bingo.  Where all the characters are one dimensional, act hard-boiled and deliver stilled dialog.  They could have been a little less blatant about the whole thing being a car commercial.

The only thing I liked was that the new wasn't pretentous like the old one. 

But it would be nice, for once, that these shows have some concern for our civil liberities.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 18, 2008, 01:03:37 PM
I'd love to see a revival of "cars" in shows though. Remember that about the 80's? Cars were practically part of the cast in quite a few of them... Knight Rider, Hardcastle, Starskey, A-Team, even Magnum PI and Miami Vice.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on February 18, 2008, 01:05:31 PM
Cars didn't make the A-Team awesome, jumping off of things and tackling the bad guys made the A-Team awesome.  It also told us that bad guys can't hit the broad side of a van with full auto mini 14s.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 18, 2008, 01:09:06 PM
Well I didn't say it made it awesome. Just that their ride was kind of part of the cast.

A-Team is still awesome though. Hope they never remake it.

Hell, KR isn't all that dated either. Didn't need to be remade. Plus, Hasselhoff is almost as irreplaceable as Shatner. Can't really be done.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 18, 2008, 02:08:38 PM
They'll remake it.  You know they will.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 18, 2008, 02:39:34 PM
Y'know, I wouldn't mind a new show with the same premise. That'd be great. Just don't call it the A-Team.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on February 19, 2008, 09:51:45 AM
Lost: I'm most curious about the finale last season when Kate said, "He'll be expecting me" or something to the sort.  I wonder if the HE is Ben now that we know he's alive and has convinced Sayid to work for him.

Terminator: I gotta say I like where this is going.  Carmeron the lying robot!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 19, 2008, 10:39:01 AM
I think it's cool that they went into some of the future storyline, with Kyle and his bro. More of that please.

[edit] As for Lost...

I don't think it's Ben. If it was, then Jack would be working with him too, would he not? I mean... Jack wants to get back to the island. So does Ben. So why would they be working against each other?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on February 19, 2008, 12:02:54 PM
When did Ben say that he wanted to get back to the island? I only remember him telling Sayid to kill XYZ to save his friends.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 19, 2008, 12:15:48 PM
Yeah I guess you're right. He never exactly said he wanted to go back. Heh. I'm just assuming he does because he was so vehement about not wanting to leave in the first place. I mean, he pretty much sabotaged every way that allowed people to leave or even communicate. Why would he want to stay in the "real world" now?

Speaking of which, wtf is doing off the island anyways? I'm not sure if I dozed off or not. Is he assumed to be one the "6" survivors, or did he slither his way off the island alone?

And who's funeral was that? I first thought it may have been Sawyer's...considering that there wasn't anyone there to visit but Jack. The only other candidate I could think of is Locke, who probably doesn't have anyone either. But... Both of those guys are supposedly staying on the island.

Quite a lot of shit to explain, I guess. Not just Ben and sentient black clouds of smoke.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 19, 2008, 08:30:25 PM
I think the consensus at the end of last season was that it was Michael's funeral.

I don't think Ben can be one of the Oceanic 6 since he wasn't on the Oceanic flight. His organization can come and go from the island so I don't see why he couldn't have just left assuming they sent in other sub or boat.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 20, 2008, 04:39:09 AM
I think the consensus at the end of last season was that it was Michael's funeral.

I don't think Ben can be one of the Oceanic 6 since he wasn't on the Oceanic flight. His organization can come and go from the island so I don't see why he couldn't have just left assuming they sent in other sub or boat.
Yes they set the funeral parlour in a poorer black section of town so I can only assume it is either Michael or Walt, unless they introduce a new black character.  I would also assume Ben's deal with Michael would have included a new identity, he couldn't have one of the flight survivors pop back up which explains why no one was at his funeral.  I don't think Michael and Walt would have counted to the six since that is a media term and the media shouldn't know about them.  Of course Walt is apparently still on the island anyways...  I'm also assuming the black list people killed him but that's a total guess.

The Wire:  That was another great episode, I liked the parallel bit with the cops and reporters.  You know why no one watches this show - the two and a half minute opening titles with the niche music.

And why did they give McNulty an Armani type tailor this season, that doesn't really fit the character, department or city at all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 20, 2008, 05:25:48 AM
I haven't watched the Wire because I tend to avoid cop shows. My old man and bro, and I guess everyone here sings it's praises, so it's on my list. As is the Shield.

Michael: Shit, yeah, I think you guys are right. I really must have dozed off somewhere. Did they happen to explain HOW he died by the way? I remember the funeral parlor guy asking Jack if he wanted to open the coffin. That disappointing now that I think about it. Michael deserved a mutilating death.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 21, 2008, 06:52:54 PM
On the end of The Wire. (http://www.newsweek.com/id/114438?from=rss)  I didn't read much of it in case there is some sort of spoiler.  I did find out he was actually at the Baltimore Sun himself though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 22, 2008, 07:10:28 AM
I don't think the writers of Lost are going to be getting any courtroom drama work in their futures, that was very meh.

And could one of the lawyers tell me if that even made any sense, it felt like a Matlock episode with the judge saying "I'm going to allow this".  Would Kate's mother's testimony be hearsay and useless and would a judge ever allow a character witness with no pertinent testimony into the actual trial?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on February 22, 2008, 07:28:45 AM
Kate does an amazing job for making Sawyer look like a good guy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 07:34:41 AM
Sawyer IS a good guy. Really, despite his shenanigans, you know where he stands.. Him and Jack are about the only two who can really be trusted to not flip out too much.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on February 22, 2008, 07:53:57 AM
I agree on Sawyer, but disagree on "I'm cool from one of my nervous breakdowns to the next"Jack. Locke can aggravate him without problems. Also, Sayid and Jin look very outflipresistant to me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 22, 2008, 08:36:59 AM
No one on the show is a "good guy." That's the point of the characters, they all have their flaws and act according to them. Sawyer wants to do right, but he can't help himself... he killed the guy who conned his mom, he conned the hot chick, made her a con woman then fucked off, he killed the guy in Australia. Jack has stability problems, as well as an inability to get over things.

There are no good guys on the island, except maybe Hugo. And he's bugfuck nuts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 08:57:19 AM
I just mean as far as they conduct themselves on the island... You can at least trust Sawyer and Jack to not go all nuts like Michael was, and now Locke is. Sawyer might be a freeloader and horde shit, but he isn't gonna stab anyone in the back really. Jin might be the next trustworthy guy... I guess he's over his xenophobia at least. I guess Desmond's cool too, forgot about him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on February 22, 2008, 09:53:14 AM
Sawyer IS a good guy. Really, despite his shenanigans, you know where he stands.. Him and Jack are about the only two who can really be trusted to not flip out too much.
(http://images.lostpedia.com/images/1/12/4x01_JackGun.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 10:23:04 AM
That was him pointing a gun at Ben, right? Or was it Locke?

Either way, they deserve to die.

What are they, supposed to be following the 10 Commandments in order to be good here?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 23, 2008, 09:06:42 AM
The mother's testimony would not be hearsay because it is an admission against interest which is an exception to the hearsay rule. But ya, the courtroom scene, like all TV courtroom scenes, wasn't very plausible. Kate looked mega-hot though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 23, 2008, 09:34:58 AM
It looked like a real courtroom though! All white and sterile, not aged and wooden.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on February 23, 2008, 10:25:47 AM
They can try and kill Locke and Ben but no one really dies in this show.  Whether they come back from the dead or just in flashbacks, they all come back.  Unfortunately, killing people usually starts up another story that will eventually be unresolved. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on February 23, 2008, 10:33:38 AM
Except when you drink and drive. The island can't stand that!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 23, 2008, 01:34:05 PM
The show needs more chicks. Too many have died.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 23, 2008, 02:16:22 PM
Nah, just more Kate in skimpy tanks or pencil skirts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 24, 2008, 08:55:28 PM
The Wire was fucking nails this week. God I am going to miss this show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on February 25, 2008, 06:30:15 AM
After much soul searching I'm okay with how they took out Omar.  That bit with McNulty being profiled was great if wildly unrealistic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on February 25, 2008, 10:34:51 AM
That was him pointing a gun at Ben, right? Or was it Locke?

Either way, they deserve to die.

What are they, supposed to be following the 10 Commandments in order to be good here?
It was pointed at Locke, and he pulled the trigger, but it misfired.

"Don't kill people" may be one of the Ten Commandments, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad idea.  As Sayid, the torturer,  mentioned, "it's just not good diplomacy."  Besides, the picture was more in response to your comment that Jack can be trusted "not to flip out too much."  That image came to mind the moment I read that.

Not that I'm a huge fan of Locke.  He's always been a little spiritually unstable, but man has he gone off the deep end this season.  I don't think he deserves to die, rather he deserves the withdrawal of the island's favor.  I think that would hurt him more.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on February 25, 2008, 11:00:14 AM
Well, by flipping out, I just mean betraying people like Michael did (and just how he generally blamed everyone around him for his problems as well); or how Locke runs off from time to time on his little soul searching quests, and tries to banish you if you question him about it (like he's doing with Kate right now), or how Charlie almost drowned a baby because he thought that was how he should baptize him.

Jack may be on edge, but that's because he's about the only one with an ability to manage and lead people --- he doesn't even want to lead anyone either (unlike Locke), so that just adds to his attitude. I don't blame him for to kill Locke though -- Locke causes damage to the entire group -- even gets them killed in the process.

That being said, Jack has yet to actually kill anyone on or off the island... Or hell, they haven't even really showed anything where he betrayed anyone's trust either really. Sure he makes funny flipped out looking faces, but even Sun has more things to be guilty about than he does (what with the whole screwing that rich guy while married to her husband thing).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on February 27, 2008, 11:12:22 AM
Lost:  It wouldn't surprise me if Locke turned out to be the least nutty guy of all, since he's now supposed to be the nuttiest guy.

Show is pissing me off yet I still watch it.

The Wire:  Finally got all caught up.  Wow, what a season.  What a show.  It and The Shield are the best television ever.  Very different shows, both gritty, both engrossingly well done.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on February 27, 2008, 11:57:44 AM
I just started watching The Wire, and I can't believe I've missed this show for so long.  And I've had HBO since it started.  I'm only about halfway into the first season, but I can tell already that its fantastic.  It does remind me of The Shield, but with more heart.  The Shield is just sadistic at times - not that there's anything wrong with that.  I broke my own cardinal rule of not watching an episode of a show out of context, but I watched one from this season of The Wire and I immediately put them all on Netflix.  I can't wait to catch up.

Dexter.  I had to break my Showtime boycott (ala Huff) to watch this, and it was worth it.  I can barely watch the opening credits, but the show itself doesn't bother me.  Is that weird?  And how in the hell did they clean it up for network?  Good God.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 28, 2008, 11:05:32 AM
So, there's a 4th Doctor Who season (http://www.scifi.com/sja/) coming soon after all. I was under the impression they were going to take a year off before filming the season with Donna Noble as the new companion. Nope, it's coming to Sci-Fi in April. Martha Jones will play a part in the season as well. Double plus gud.

Also, the Sarah Jane character gets her own spin-off series, which hopefully will be good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on February 28, 2008, 02:56:49 PM
I've been wondering what happened to Who.. I thought there was supposed to be new episodes in January... At least there still Torchwood.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on February 29, 2008, 06:32:22 AM
Lost 4x05: what a serious mindfuck we got  :drill: :drill:

One of the greatest episodes of the entire saga, just like "Flashes Before Your Eyes" (and again, with Desmond and Penny as the main characters portrayed). I guess some might not like it because it dwelves into a kinda more irrational territory, but I just love movies concerning paradox, time travels and suchlike ("Butterfly Effect", for example). Stellar performance by the actor playing Daniel Faraday, and great performance by the white bunny in the labyrinth. Race on! :P


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on February 29, 2008, 07:29:02 AM
That little bit of time-travel mystery added to Lost was a good addition, some more fantastical added to what at times can be a story that's too much about ordinary people. I like it when they play up the werid/sci-fi aspects of the island.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on February 29, 2008, 07:45:12 AM
Penny's Dad was buying some book related to the Lost metagame, some journal by some explorer back in the day that originally discovered the island.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 29, 2008, 09:31:10 AM
That little bit of time-travel mystery added to Lost was a good addition, some more fantastical added to what at times can be a story that's too much about ordinary people. I like it when they play up the werid/sci-fi aspects of the island.

I wish they would get back to that, i loved the resident evil feel of the dharma corp and the mystery of them on the island.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on February 29, 2008, 06:10:27 PM
The book was the first mate's log from the Black Swan which is the slave ship found in the middle of the Island and came from the family of Alvar Hanso whose foundation ran the Dharma project.

I read a post from Damon Lindelof (show runner for Lost and executive producer of upcoming Trek) in some Trek forum interview that this episode (which I thought was absolutely brilliant, the show is always kick-ass when centered on Desmond IMO) is an homage to the series finally of Next Generation "All Good Things..."  He says it is the best series ending episode of all time and they wanted to do an episode like it and didn't want it at the end of the series because that would be too derivative.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on March 02, 2008, 12:19:13 PM
Not mad at Lost anymore.  Last episode fixed that.  Best ever, maybe.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 03, 2008, 08:44:37 AM
The book was the first mate's log from the Black Swan which is the slave ship found in the middle of the Island and came from the family of Alvar Hanso whose foundation ran the Dharma project.


Black Rock.

Also, Ep5, did they start, AND end a plot twist in one episode? OMFG!!! (yes i watched it)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 04, 2008, 08:48:54 AM
So I missed the first hour of the season finale of Terminator last night.  Caught the second hour though.

The show went from "I like this, look forward to next week" to "Jesus Christ, I like this so much now that FOX has to cancel it."

The scene that moved it for me was when the Cash started playing and you knew all the agents were gonna die, but the way it was filmed w/ the water and muted sounds and the Man Comes Around playing in the background just moved the show to another level for me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on March 05, 2008, 06:27:43 PM
It seemed a little risky by the director - it could have come off as too pretentious, or just as trying to get around a difficult to film fight scene, but putting Cash in there made it work.

Despite the fact that Signe hates Johnny Cash.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on March 05, 2008, 07:56:50 PM
I loved the finale.  Fox will cancel it. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 06, 2008, 08:12:15 AM
Goddamn you, you may be right.

The series has been worlds better than I ever expected it to be. It was a shitton better than the 3rd movie. So yeah, Fox will probably shitcan it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 06, 2008, 08:37:18 AM
I think they will cancel.  Wikipedia list the ratings for the shows like this:

11.1
6.2
5.3
5.5
5.1
4.9
6.7
7.9
8.2

It did go out okay but the middle is Jericho territory.  No doubt the anti-dvr bias of nelsons is screwing it as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 06, 2008, 08:46:01 AM
No doubt the anti-dvr bias of nelsons is screwing it as well.


This, more than anything, is what will screw it.  The show is aimed at a demographic that simply doesn't watch TV the way the Neilsons are say viewers watch TV.  The audience's viewing habits have changed due to lifestyle and technology, but let's just continue to assume that all of the US sits down at a regular time every evening/ week to watch their particular show(s).   


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 06, 2008, 09:10:46 AM
I've actually been doing alot of my tv viewing lately at the respective network websites.  I wonder if they'll start to factor that in.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on March 06, 2008, 09:12:15 AM
No doubt the anti-dvr bias of nelsons is screwing it as well.


This, more than anything, is what will screw it.  The show is aimed at a demographic that simply doesn't watch TV the way the Neilsons are say viewers watch TV.  The audience's viewing habits have changed due to lifestyle and technology, but let's just continue to assume that all of the US sits down at a regular time every evening/ week to watch their particular show(s).   

If the networks were to admit that, it would completely fuck the way they calculate the prices on their ad space (which us DVR types skip anyway).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on March 06, 2008, 10:43:30 AM
The Terminator show really has met and exceeded expectations.  Hell, I watched some of T2 last night and for the first time I thought, 'this looks so dated.'

I thought the first hour this week was especially strong.  I want to marry Cameron and have little bionic children.  What?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on March 06, 2008, 12:11:34 PM
The irony is that DVR companies could get some golden data from DVRs. Time Warner could see all the crap I've got set to 'record all new episodes' or whatever.

We joke that our 'scheduled recordings' list is a graveyard of quality programming. So many great shows sitting in there, long cancelled...waiting in vain for a next new episode that will never arrive.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on March 06, 2008, 12:31:06 PM
So I'm not the only one?  Mine is the same way.  Sometimes it pays off, though.  New episodes of The Riches coming soon!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on March 06, 2008, 01:01:52 PM
I'm holding out for more Bullshit! and Lucky Louie. Or more than the single episode of Secret Spaces, which highlighted houses with secret chambers. Guess who was the highlight of the one and only episode? Rich Garriot!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on March 06, 2008, 03:40:17 PM
No doubt the anti-dvr bias of nelsons is screwing it as well.


This, more than anything, is what will screw it.  The show is aimed at a demographic that simply doesn't watch TV the way the Neilsons are say viewers watch TV.  The audience's viewing habits have changed due to lifestyle and technology, but let's just continue to assume that all of the US sits down at a regular time every evening/ week to watch their particular show(s).   

If the networks were to admit that, it would completely fuck the way they calculate the prices on their ad space (which us DVR types skip anyway).

Which, I believe, is the one reason they will never ever data mine the DVRs.  Remember the internet ad implosion?  They see that doom coming and are trying to push it way the fuck off so they can continue their handwaving about "x-million see your ad! Ignore the follow-through part that doomed internet clickage!"



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on March 07, 2008, 09:18:06 AM
It seemed a little risky by the director - it could have come off as too pretentious, or just as trying to get around a difficult to film fight scene, but putting Cash in there made it work.

Despite the fact that Signe hates Johnny Cash.

I had to read this twice,  because the first time I read the bold. 

The Terminator scene was solid.  It didn't hurt that the Cash song always reminds me of the title sequence in the Dawn of the Dead remake,  which was another bad ass use of the song.  It's a solid show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 09, 2008, 09:49:52 AM
Tonight's the last episode of The Wire, I don't think they will be able to wrap everything up to my satisfaction in sixty minutes.  They have to crucify McNulty, reveal the fraud, take out the lawyer, find an informant in the court, prosecute/kill Marlo, prove the reporter to be a fraud, wrap up the Mayor's ambitions and as far as I'm concerned they need to deal with the Greek too.  He's only been on air this season for maybe ten seconds and he's the main guy I've wanted them to nail since season two.  Either I'm not getting all that or the last ten minutes will just be a series of clips set to music of people being arrested/prosecuted/changing careers...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 09, 2008, 09:52:18 AM
It's a 95 minute episode, but knowing Simon he won't resolve everything, which is sorta his point for the whole series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on March 09, 2008, 06:13:58 PM
In Treatment might be one of the best TV shows I've ever seen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 09, 2008, 07:13:56 PM
The Wire finale was a thing of beauty. I'm actually in tears right now both in appreciate and sadness that there will be no more.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 09, 2008, 07:48:33 PM
NYT has a review of it up already. (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/arts/television/10stan.html?hp)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 11, 2008, 12:25:10 PM
So, The Tudors (http://www.sho.com/site/tudors/home.do?source=shocom_nav).

Good show. watched all of season 1.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 12, 2008, 01:21:42 PM
I finally got through watching all of Jericho's first season, and I can definitely recommend the show. Good pacing for the season. It does fall into some schmaltzy family touchy-feely TV formula at times, but the story is strong enough to overcome it. The acting is good, and the only characters that are really annoying are ones that are supposed to be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on March 12, 2008, 03:31:08 PM
Top Chef returns tonight,  for all your food porn needs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 12, 2008, 04:30:27 PM
Awesome, I'll check out Jericho.  What time is Top Chef?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on March 12, 2008, 05:17:39 PM
Awesome, I'll check out Jericho.  What time is Top Chef?

10 PM on Bravo.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on March 13, 2008, 12:37:55 AM
Tonight's the last episode of The Wire, I don't think they will be able to wrap everything up to my satisfaction in sixty minutes.  They have to crucify McNulty, reveal the fraud, take out the lawyer, find an informant in the court, prosecute/kill Marlo, prove the reporter to be a fraud, wrap up the Mayor's ambitions and as far as I'm concerned they need to deal with the Greek too.  He's only been on air this season for maybe ten seconds and he's the main guy I've wanted them to nail since season two.  Either I'm not getting all that or the last ten minutes will just be a series of clips set to music of people being arrested/prosecuted/changing careers...

I'd say they tied up pretty much everything you mentioned except the last, and still did the clips set to music, but for a broader purpose :) It was awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on March 13, 2008, 12:44:21 PM
I've watched the first season and some of the early episodes of the second season of Jericho and I'll second the thumbs up. It's does a very good job on pacing as well as keeping a couple of different storylines all going well together. I saw some comparisons on that front with Galactica insofar as they're mixing up survival from hostile forces, internal politics and struggle as well as throwing in some fun conspiracy related story. I also think they handle the setting of post-apocalyptic America pretty well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 13, 2008, 12:46:47 PM
Having now seen the first episode of Jericho Season 2, I think it's pretty cool that the entire first season was really nothing more than a setup for the events that season 2 is kicking off. 22 episodes of setup. It's like Babylon 5, only with a tighter first season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 13, 2008, 01:23:35 PM
Then I guess you don't want me talking about about awesome the last show was?  Too bad there is virtually no chance of a third season. I wonder if Sci Fi could pick it up?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 13, 2008, 02:16:51 PM
I doubt Sci-Fi would want to put down the budget for the show, but who knows? They could do one or two less Mansquito movies and get an episode or two out of it. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 14, 2008, 10:10:50 AM
I didn't much like last night's Lost, it was allright though.  What turned out to be the Jin flashback was just a retarded stunt, that whole thing added absolutely nothing to the plot because it was only done to fake out the audience.  Next episode looks solid though, then a hiatus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on March 14, 2008, 01:54:41 PM
I didn't much like last night's Lost, it was allright though.  What turned out to be the Jin flashback was just a retarded stunt, that whole thing added absolutely nothing to the plot because it was only done to fake out the audience.  Next episode looks solid though, then a hiatus.

I knew something was up. I kept thinking that Jin and Sun couldn't both be the last 2 out of the 6. That wouldn't make any sense in terms of main characters and drama. I think the last one of the 6 is Sawyer. I think Locke gets bumped off here at some point for going on a tyrannical rampage, or Ben whacks him. There's no other main characters left.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 14, 2008, 03:53:56 PM
Well others could live but not leave the island.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 14, 2008, 04:08:14 PM
Well others could live but not leave the island.
Yes that's pretty much a sure thing, I assume Locke stays with most of the survivors.  I'm have no idea who number six will be, Jin could even still be in the running since I'm not sure if they visited a grave or just a monument at the end there.  I assume if Claire left that she'd be with the baby instead of Kate.  Michael's back in play too but if that was his funeral last season I think it would have attracted more press/people.  If Sawyer leaves too then that leaves whatever plots still going on the island bereft of main characters.

I had to look up Claire's name and wikipedia seems to think Jin is one of the six, I think they're wrong.

Edit: Heh I  just looked at the edits for the page and someone pointed out that Jin's death was written as the day of the crash so he's not one of the six and the wiki page is wrong.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 14, 2008, 10:56:51 PM
Michael has to be #6. They said this episode revealed all of the 6 and he is the only other one off the island. He is also the most likely candidate for the coffin in last season's finale.

EDIT: From reading around, lots of people seem to think Aaron is #6.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on March 15, 2008, 01:30:04 AM
I thought it was weird that they brought in Zoe Bell, and just killed her off in her first episode. I guess they needed her to pull off that stunt? :\

Michael better not redeem himself. I was all set and ready for him to die horribly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on March 15, 2008, 03:12:35 AM
In Treatment might be one of the best TV shows I've ever seen.

This show kind of scares me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 15, 2008, 05:51:53 AM
So we've got:

1. Jack
2. Kate
3. Sayeed
4. Hurley
5. Sun
6. Aaron (technically).


Although, would Aaron be considered a 'survivor' if he was born there?

I liked the episode alot, but I've always liked Jin/Sun plot.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on March 15, 2008, 07:09:48 AM
Supposedly one of the lost podcasts says that neither Ben nor Aaron count to the six.  I'm not listening to a podcast to verify that though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on March 15, 2008, 07:52:41 AM
I thought it was weird that they brought in Zoe Bell, and just killed her off in her first episode. I guess they needed her to pull off that stunt? :\

Michael better not redeem himself. I was all set and ready for him to die horribly.

I suspect she will play a larger role in Michael's flashbacks next week.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on March 15, 2008, 05:17:15 PM
The Return of Jezebel James looks promising. It's basically The Odd Couple but with two sisters. Unfortunately it's on FOX on Fridays which means it'll probably be cancelled prematurely, though with the strike this TV season they may at least show all the episodes they've made.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on March 15, 2008, 05:22:38 PM
Any show placed in the Fox Friday Slot basically assures I will skip it simply due to the fact it will never, ever be resolved.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on March 15, 2008, 05:24:30 PM
Not exactly TV related, but has anyone seen the movie "The TV Set" with David Duchovny. Funny shit, about the trials and tribulations of getting a pilot on air (and timeslots).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on March 15, 2008, 07:09:42 PM
Any show placed in the Fox Friday Slot basically assures I will skip it simply due to the fact it will never, ever be resolved.
They sometimes get resolved if they get released on DVDs. Wonderfalls (which I'm still bitter about) was that way. Even though it wasn't a full season they did resolve the main story arc by the last episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on March 18, 2008, 06:34:05 AM
Time Warner just added six (or so) new HD channels. Mostly Discovery stuff, History, Science, second Discovery, Animal Planet, a couple others.

History and Science are my two favorite channels. I'm stoked. Do people still say that?  :geezer:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 18, 2008, 07:43:17 AM
History HD finally!

That's awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on March 22, 2008, 09:34:43 AM
Jericho was cancelled. (http://tinyurl.com/ywvnpv)

I never watched this, but meant to.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cim on March 23, 2008, 09:57:57 PM
It was canceled again? This is the second time!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on March 23, 2008, 10:53:37 PM
It was canceled again? This is the second time!

:( 

I really liked that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on March 24, 2008, 12:02:44 AM
Well. at least they had warning this time. They made two season ending episodes and one of them was to end the series if they weren't renewed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on March 24, 2008, 04:04:38 AM
Not a surprise. It was cancelled then uncancelled when crazed fans mailed in a bunch of peanuts or something like that. Usually shows that are axed but get a reprieve thanks to rabid fans are axed again soon enough.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 24, 2008, 07:04:00 AM
Jericho was cancelled. (http://tinyurl.com/ywvnpv)

I never watched this, but meant to.

FUCKITY FUCK FUCK FUCKERS FUCK.

Rampaging Thundercunts. While I'm not surprised, it's still a fucked decision. The fact they don't count Tivo's, Internet streaming or Itunes downloads when considering the ratings of a show tell me they are complete pigfuckers.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on March 24, 2008, 07:41:22 AM
I was going to say, "Or that they care about ensuring advertisers don't see how much of the content they're subsidising is being viewed without their adverts."

But then I realised that I was just paraphrasing you with more words.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on March 24, 2008, 08:44:47 AM
Thing is, there are ads on the Jericho episodes on the Net. It's only one ad per commercial break (usually a 15-second) but advertisers are paying, and probably at a lower rate because it's a rebroadcast and not a live showing. I would hope THOSE advertisers are getting some numbers on views and click-thrus, otherwise those are some dumb motherfuckers.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on March 24, 2008, 09:47:53 AM
It'll be a long time before networks get with the times and gauge viewer interest in these ways. I'm sure there'll be many more shows that get the shaft before that happens. It sucks, but it's pointless to bitch about. :\

Hell, they barely even factor in DVD sales or reruns. Even if the shit is mega-popular it takes a long time for them to reconsider. Look at how long Family Guy was off the air.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on March 24, 2008, 09:57:56 AM
Fuck even the record industry has happily moved to using download charts to track sales.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on March 24, 2008, 01:17:51 PM
Has anyone been watching New Amsterdam? I just finished the pilot episode and it's looking pretty good. They've only been showing it since the beginning of the month. It must be a mid season replacement.

It's about a homicide detective in New York City who is like 400 years old because he was cursed to be immortal until he meets his one true love. It sounds stupider than it is but at least it's a change from the vampire stuff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on March 25, 2008, 05:41:24 AM
I thought New Amsterdam was boring as hell.  It's still a step up from the craptacular Moonlight, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on March 25, 2008, 06:08:21 AM
I didn't like it much, either.  I wonder if they have some of these "new" shows in storage, waiting for a rainy day or something.  I expect a lot of them will simply disappear when everything gets back to normal.  I thought the first season of Jericho was interesting and then I lost interest.  Nothing I saw in the new season changed my mind.  I thought the writing, especially dialog, was pretty bad.  I haven't made up my mind if Eli Stone is entertaining or if I just have a crush on Sick Boy again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on March 25, 2008, 06:35:37 AM
Hmm, maybe I'll like it less when I've seen more of it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on March 25, 2008, 07:12:28 AM
Hmm, maybe I'll like it less when I've seen more of it.

The last few months we've been so desperate for entertainment when it's telly time that we've ended up watching all sorts of rubbish.  Not that the show is all rubbish... I just didn't find it very interesting.  I watched it, though.  Why?  I was desperate!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on March 25, 2008, 07:34:45 AM
Mid-season replacements are usually mid-season replacements for a reason. I just read that New Amsterdam has shut down production already and is unlikely to be renewed.

http://www.tv.com/new-amsterdam/show/68703/story/10324.html

Funny bit: It was going to start at the start of the season but was bumped by "Don't Forget the Lyrics." Lol.

Sounds like it was axed before it even aired.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on March 25, 2008, 07:53:30 AM
You talk as if being cancelled has anything at all to do with the quality of a television show.  :grin:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 25, 2008, 12:23:21 PM
Just a heads up.

Hulu.com is out of beta and all south park episodes are now streaming at soutparkstudios.com


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Zetleft on March 25, 2008, 04:37:31 PM
Jericho was cancelled. (http://tinyurl.com/ywvnpv)

I never watched this, but meant to.

This is why I don't watch TV shows.  I've only started watching the reruns they are showing on sci fi and really liked it.... that's the kiss of death, sorry guys.   I can't be blamed for the first cancellation though   :uhrr:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on March 25, 2008, 08:55:45 PM
The ending to Jericho was pretty good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 26, 2008, 05:40:46 AM
I just started watching it.  About 7 episodes in.  Decent enough so far.  Although, it's painfully obvious why Skeet doesn't get very many acting jobs.  Also, the music is terrible/terribly timed.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on March 26, 2008, 07:56:14 AM
Just a heads up.

Hulu.com is out of beta and all south park episodes are now streaming at soutparkstudios.com

Work well, I highly recommend you go to season 11 and watch the Imagination Land trilogy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on March 26, 2008, 08:03:17 AM
Ya, I started it last night.  So awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on March 28, 2008, 07:55:37 PM
My wife recently discovered Cheap Seats on ESPN Classic and is, at this very moment, laughing her fucking ass off watching it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Xanthippe on March 31, 2008, 09:50:17 AM
We've been enjoying the HBO series John Adams.  I believe it's a 10 part series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: K9 on April 02, 2008, 01:24:34 PM
Is anyone watching Dirty Sexy Money? The series finally came to the UK recently and I caught the 2nd (3rd?) episode last night and enjoyed it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on April 02, 2008, 03:37:31 PM
It's not showing at the moment in the US because of the strike (and might not again this season) but I did enjoy it while it was on. The lead character is a bit bland (presumably intentionally) but Donald Sutherland is really good on it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on April 03, 2008, 12:11:36 AM
Well I just got around to watch the first 6 seasons of scrubs on DVD. All around a great series but in and after Season 5 it got really tiring.
It just seems that they didn't really know what to do with the characters any longer.

Cox's speeches were annoying and I still can't get around that whole "Give J.D. another girlfriend for two episodes just so that he can fuck it up again by being really childish"

In the first few seasons everybody had his/her quirks but overall they were portrayed as humans. Starting with season 5 the cast got really one-dimensional and they highlighted the quirky just too much. Especially the characters of Cox and J.D. which got from likeable but strange to "Oh my god I can't stand their antics any longer"

Oh and I can't still get over the whole J.D, and Kim and their unplanned child storyline. They really jumped the shark on this one in my opinion.

As far as Battlestar Galactica is concerned I'm still stuck in season 2. Great show but I can't watch more than one or to episodes at a time. Bleak and tough all around. Take the Pegasus episode for example, murder, attempted rape, political schemes and the like. Hard to watch at times without flinching but great, great writing. Sometimes I wonder how they manage to broadcast that without concerned parents getting their panties in a twist.

Oh and can anyone explain to me why they didn't make Adama an Admiral. You know before Pegasus arrived he commanded the whole Colony fleet so it might be a wise move to not have him lose his position by that really cold-hearted bitch.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on April 03, 2008, 05:04:31 AM
I liked the funny parts of scrubs and tried to watch it when it first came out but I couldn't get over the jarring combination of silly comedy and terrible diseases killing people all over the place.

* funny scene *
* patient is given three months to live, dying from cancer *
* funny scene *

 :sad_panda:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 03, 2008, 06:31:33 AM
We've been enjoying the HBO series John Adams.  I believe it's a 10 part series.
I'm really, really into the Adams series. One of my favorite time periods. I live in a very historic region, and we have a lot of original materials from the time period in our closed stacks. And when General Knox (the fatass) rolls through and then they show one of his temporary fortifications, I got shivers because that is exactly the spot my great-great-great-great-great-grandfather was at the time, he fought with Knox. He was probably one of the guys in that scene.

The acting is top-notch, it's pretty good on every level from sets to cinematography, though some of the CGI stuff is a bit overly obvious. Giamatti is brilliant, but everyone is doing a great job.

But it highlights the atrocious acting by the lead in the Tudors (my fiancee's favorite time period). We watched ep1-3 of Adams over the weekend and the first ep of the new season of Tudors last night and it was difficult (for me). Especially when the Henry character is surrounded by some decent actors (the Queen, Thomas, and last season Woolsey).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on April 03, 2008, 05:45:33 PM
Oh and can anyone explain to me why they didn't make Adama an Admiral. You know before Pegasus arrived he commanded the whole Colony fleet so it might be a wise move to not have him lose his position by that really cold-hearted bitch.

They didn't have the pin until she died.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Yegolev on April 04, 2008, 07:26:54 AM
I find Scrubs to be great in syndication since I can watch five or ten minutes of it every few nights while making dinner.  If I had to grind out multiple seasons consecutively, I'd probably stab Zach Braff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 04, 2008, 07:39:45 AM
NEW BATTLESTAR TONIGHT! (http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on April 15, 2008, 01:39:23 PM
I got say Dirt was surprising good this (short) season.  The new owner is a riot.  The photographer is an amazing actor.  Coutney Cox's "I hate celebrities" crusade is so satifying.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 15, 2008, 01:41:08 PM
Yeah, i've caught a few eps. I like it too. I also like Eddie Izzard's show, though I'm afraid it might not last.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Slayerik on April 16, 2008, 09:28:11 AM
Deadliest Catch is teh win.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 16, 2008, 10:23:58 AM
Deadliest Catch should have been named Water, Weather, and White Trash.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 16, 2008, 10:31:42 AM
It's still an entertaining show, though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on April 16, 2008, 11:14:18 AM
It's the pinnacle of white trash.  It's white trash you can be proud of.  More :drill: than :ye_gods:.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 16, 2008, 02:34:33 PM
If you can be proud of them, they're not trash. They're Rural.  There's a HUUUUGE difference.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on April 16, 2008, 07:20:35 PM
Did anyone see the new episode of The Office yet?  I can't remember laughing that hard because of a TV show in a long long time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 16, 2008, 08:47:47 PM
Did anyone see the new episode of The Office yet?  I can't remember laughing that hard because of a TV show in a long long time.

You took me by the haaaaand. And maaaade me a maaaan.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stu on April 16, 2008, 09:09:19 PM
I'm just glad some new episodes are on! I laughed at Michael Scott as the battered housewife who wants to have kids with his abusive mate.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on April 16, 2008, 09:10:58 PM
And to top it all off the newest episode of Boston Legal was fantastic.  Tv!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 17, 2008, 06:25:05 AM
Did anyone see the new episode of The Office yet?  I can't remember laughing that hard because of a TV show in a long long time.
Sometimes I stand and watch it (the tiny plasma tv) for hours.

Michael tries to hug Angela: "No."

Jan doing the twirl with Tuna's hand while he sits on the sofa.

But the song was the best. Reminds me of a cd submission by the artist we got a few years ago. On CD-R with a hand-written songlist. And a note saying mixed badly. And another note saying songs I might record in the future, with a list. And note saying one of those future songs "I might not record". A cd of the most tone-deaf, yet mesmerizingly bad songs I've heard.

The Office pwns, babe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 17, 2008, 09:29:09 AM
That Office episode was a scream. You have to worry about such a long layoff affecting the quality of the show, but that episode was all win.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 17, 2008, 09:50:50 AM
ROFL at the $200 TV.

"What seems to be the problem, officers?" "Not now, Dwight."

"My apartment is on fire." (whispers) "Flooded." "Flooded."

"I have soft teeth."




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 18, 2008, 05:58:23 AM
"Pam?"

"Can you wait while I tie my shoe?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on April 21, 2008, 09:53:42 AM
That was awesome. I was also howling when Michael was grilling Phyllis about the professional softball player- "Would she fit in a regular-sized rowboat? Would it capsize?"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 21, 2008, 10:44:55 AM
We're catching up on Earl. Great line when the faith healer's dad wants Earl to pretend to be injured.

"Let me see you limp."

Earl unzips his pants.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on April 22, 2008, 04:32:39 PM
Preview of The Venture Bros. 3rd season.  The G.I. Joe bit at the end is hilarious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN5BRwkdqWw


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on April 23, 2008, 08:07:14 AM
She'll be back. (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3icfe13ead83e2831b92a2631aad07931d)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 23, 2008, 08:09:59 AM
Reneging on family guy and now this. I guess the days of Fox making boneheaded moves is over?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on April 23, 2008, 03:43:29 PM
Speaking of necroshows, when are the new episodes of Futurama supposed to begin on comedy central?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 23, 2008, 04:05:25 PM
Last month.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on April 23, 2008, 04:06:49 PM
Erm, they already started, or they were supposed to?  I havn't heard a thing about new ones in awhile.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on April 23, 2008, 04:16:07 PM
There was a new futurama movie that came out last year, and the first "new" episodes airing on comedy central is the movie, but split up. Then there's completely new material following after that (I think 16 episodes are already made or something?).

[edit] Also, 3 other dvd movies are being made (each roughly 4 episodes long).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on April 23, 2008, 08:53:12 PM
Ah, I saw that movie, I thought there was more already ):


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on April 24, 2008, 06:02:57 AM
Just got around to watching last friday's Maher.

I  :heart: Cornel West.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 24, 2008, 10:10:34 PM
Lost is so fucking money this season it is scary.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 25, 2008, 09:26:50 AM
I never thought I'd empathize with Ben, EVER.  Fuckers.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: AcidCat on April 25, 2008, 09:43:03 AM
That episode was fucking amazing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on April 25, 2008, 09:56:29 AM
Wow, bar none the most awesome episode ever of LOST. I've always kind of liked Ben's character because he's a sly bastard who seems to be in control of every situation even when he's locked up. This episode just makes me like him even more. Whitmore is a dick. Two evil geniuses locked into a battle of wills?

 :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 25, 2008, 10:18:52 AM
I'm glad you guys like it all.

I'm just confused as hell.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on April 25, 2008, 11:26:38 AM
Lostpedia (http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Main_Page) helped me out a lot, and the best part is it doesn't have any spoilers!

I would highly suggest going there, even though I've seen every episode I couldn't keep up when talking with a co-worker since I didn't play the game or watch the webisodes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 25, 2008, 11:35:44 AM
I'm glad they are finally giving Ben some depth beyond just evil crazy fucker. That episode was definitely money. Anyone know how many are left in this season? It seems like they are building to a whole bunch of shit in a very short time frame, but that may just be me not knowing how many episodes are left.

Also, Ben teleported off the island to Tunisia. Amirite?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on April 25, 2008, 11:59:30 AM
The Office was a touch uneven this week.  I'm worried that with Jim and Pam together we have a Moonlighting problem going on- the secondary story was stupid.  However "A month ago, people were worried that if they visited our website they would be molested" is pure fucking gold. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on April 25, 2008, 12:01:38 PM
Also, Ben teleported off the island to Tunisia. Amirite?
Neither location would explain the parka, unless the travel itself is very cold...

I'm pretty upset they killed the girl, that wasn't very nice.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on April 25, 2008, 01:26:58 PM
Budget cuts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 25, 2008, 05:21:58 PM
Also, Ben teleported off the island to Tunisia. Amirite?
Neither location would explain the parka, unless the travel itself is very cold...

I'm pretty upset they killed the girl, that wasn't very nice.

He was wearing a parka with Halliwax's name on it (the dude in all the Dharma videos even though he uses multiple names) so there is whole bunches of shit related to that we don't yet know about. 

I wouldn't put this as the best ep (that would be "The Constant") but it rocked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on April 25, 2008, 09:18:31 PM
I never got why you all loved "The Constant," but that's different strokes for different folks. Time travel bullshit drives me nuts.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 25, 2008, 09:24:12 PM
I loved that episode for multiple reasons including that it was a reworking of a great TNG episode, that Henry Ian Cusick is a great actor that pulled it off masterfully, that it went a long way to explaining what is going on with the island and that it was seamlessly done.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on April 25, 2008, 09:29:15 PM
I loved that episode for multiple reasons including that it was a reworking of a great TNG episode, that Henry Ian Cusick is a great actor that pulled it off masterfully, that it went a long way to explaining what is going on with the island and that it was seamlessly done.

All good reasons. I liked the episode myself in spite of the time travel theme. I guess that's something. Best ever to me? No.

Watching Ben call down the thunder and watching him deal with a man changing the rules? Sorry, that's pure win for me.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 25, 2008, 09:34:30 PM
Can't argue with that. "The Shape of Things to Come" definitely ranks up in the top five eps for me. It's really hilarious that a guy who was slated for a two ep guest spot is now the central character for the whole series. Ben is freaking Jason Bourne, Moriarity, Dr. Manhattan and Batman all rolled into one. Emerson should win an Emmy but like Greogry Itzin on 24 will be overlooked.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 25, 2008, 09:56:50 PM
Speaking of good TV actors, I've been watching the first season of B5 on hulu and I am continually amazed at how good Katsulas (and to a tiny esser degree Jurasik) are on that series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on April 25, 2008, 10:02:28 PM
Can't argue with that. "The Shape of Things to Come" definitely ranks up in the top five eps for me. It's really hilarious that a guy who was slated for a two ep guest spot is now the central character for the whole series. Ben is freaking Jason Bourne, Moriarity, Dr. Manhattan and Batman all rolled into one. Emerson should win an Emmy but like Greogry Itzin on 24 will be overlooked.

Agreed. Ben gives Jaime Lannister a run for his money. If yall understand the reference.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on April 25, 2008, 10:24:11 PM
Speaking of good TV actors, I've been watching the first season of B5 on hulu and I am continually amazed at how good Katsulas (and to a tiny esser degree Jurasik) are on that series.

Those two were my favorites. The first season captain was the absolute worst though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on April 25, 2008, 10:32:13 PM
I don't think he was that bad. O'Hare is a stage actor and you can really see that aspect in his performance.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on April 26, 2008, 05:16:49 AM
Katsulas was an interesting guy from JMS's comments on the S1 disk.  He'd go completely into character as soon as he had the makeup on, and wouldn't leave until it came off.  JMH said something about even on breaks when smoking he'd be G'Kar smoking a cig which was a bizarre experience. 

Jurasik it was just interesting to find out had been in Tron.  He looked damn different by the time B5 came around. And not just from the hair. Which was, btw, the result of a joke and a misunderstanding. Jurasik came out from makeup the first time with the hair like that and asked JMS "hey what do you think, looks great right?"  JMS thought he was serious and told him it looked fantastic because he thought Jurasik really liked it. Jurasik then didn't have the heart to tell him it was a joke because he thought the same as JMS.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on April 26, 2008, 03:08:12 PM
If you haven't seen the other seasons of B5, you are in for a treat. Katsulas was just an incredible actor, and you could tell he had some fantastic chemistry with Jurasik. Those two were the heart of the show and the universe, IMO, and that's part of why the later takes in that universe have not been as good. Jurasik has mostly retired from acting, and Katsulas has died. Those two characters, played by those two actors, gave us all the best dramatic beats for that series, and not having that conflict made the other stories weaker.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on April 30, 2008, 04:00:47 PM
So I've been watching Friday Night Lights (just finishing up the first season).  Once I got over the whole "26 year olds playing highschoolers", it's a really fantastic show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on April 30, 2008, 11:52:37 PM
I ignored this series because I neither know nor care about American Football. Is it a fantastic show despite this (if for example I pretend they play baseball)?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 01, 2008, 04:02:12 AM
Not as much.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on May 14, 2008, 10:18:12 AM
Who saw this weeks House?

Amaza-zing!  :awesome_for_real: :awesome_for_real: :awesome_for_real:

I also read that CBS picked up a show called "Eleventh Hour", it's a US adaptation of a British series and the pilot is being filmed with a budget of 4 million dollars.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 14, 2008, 02:42:46 PM
Probably making up for the fact British shows cost $4 to make. For an entire season.

Including actors.

And food.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 14, 2008, 05:40:56 PM
Who saw this weeks House?

Amaza-zing!  :awesome_for_real: :awesome_for_real: :awesome_for_real:
House has been really good this year. The competition storyline to find the replacements was hilarious from start to finish. And then the storyline with Amber being Wilson's girlfriend was a woot as well. I didn't think having double the number of supporting cast members (the 3 that quit at the end of last season but are still in the show and the 3 replacements plus Amber) would work out but it has.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 15, 2008, 04:32:51 PM
Who saw this weeks House?

Amaza-zing!  :awesome_for_real: :awesome_for_real: :awesome_for_real:
House has been really good this year. The competition storyline to find the replacements was hilarious from start to finish. And then the storyline with Amber being Wilson's girlfriend was a woot as well. I didn't think having double the number of supporting cast members (the 3 that quit at the end of last season but are still in the show and the 3 replacements plus Amber) would work out but it has.


I think they finally realized we don't give a shit about the supporting characters beyond their interactions with House and doing his bidding.  They were on a dangerous path of giving them too much back story and face time last season with Cutty's baby issues, Wilson's divorce, C&C sleeping together and Foreman's "Omg I'm House" angst.  Taking the focus away from them to the point that we still haven't seen much of the new group's lives made the series better.


Unrelated Tangent:  WTF is with Klondike buying all this ad space and product placements on NBC tonight? They bought the whole background and the banner ads on TVguide.com, too.  If I watched ER I'd expect them to ice a wound with the fucking things.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on May 15, 2008, 07:01:37 PM
The Office was pure undiluted awesome.  I've never felt as satisfied about the fate of a TV character as I did watching the Ryan scene. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 15, 2008, 08:28:59 PM
(http://www.thenibble.com/zine/draft1/images/Ice-Cream-Sandwich.jpg)

Summer is almost here.  It's time for ice cream! 



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 16, 2008, 06:46:45 PM
Never thought I'd see Whedon do another TV series for Fox, but it looks like he's working on a series called Dollhouse (http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/james-hibberd/2007/10/joss_whedon_returns_to_fox_wit.php) starring Eliza Dushku.

Quote
Joss Whedon, the creator of acclaimed cult favorites “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Angel” and “Firefly,” is returning to Fox and reuniting with “Buffy” regular Eliza Dushku for a new action-drama called “Dollhouse.”

Fox has given a seven-episode commitment to the 20th Century Fox Television project for a planned debut next year.

“It deals with our darkest impulses and our best ones,” Whedon says. “It deals with all the things I like to deal with—strength, weakness, power and corruption.”

“Dollhouse” stars Dushku as Echo, one of a group of secret agents living in a futuristic dorm. Each has the ability to be imprinted with custom personalities and abilities for special assignments. When they return, their newly acquired memories are wiped. The show follows Echo as she takes on a variety of assignments—some romantic, some adventurous, some uplifting, some illegal—and gains awareness of her role and confinement.

Any bets on whether or not it will make it past the seven-episode commitment, or if all seven episodes will even air?
Dollhouse trailer up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3ul5EUJWxs


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 16, 2008, 07:19:27 PM
The Office was pure undiluted awesome.  I've never felt as satisfied about the fate of a TV character as I did watching the Ryan scene. 

The whole Kevin-as-a-retard thing was absolutely hilarious. I hope Amy Ryan is on the show for a while.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on May 17, 2008, 11:13:43 AM
Latest episode of Dr. Who was entertaining, remarkably silly and clearly a "filler" but I still enjoyed myself. Don't know how many of you are UK/Proxied into BBC iPlayer but it's probably a better way of killing an hour than a lot of TV. Only if you are definitely a Dr. Who fan though, I don't think it'd really grab anyone who didn't already love it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on May 17, 2008, 11:19:46 AM
I'm so glad Whedon always goes outside his comfort zone.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 18, 2008, 08:23:55 PM
Wooooo, Dethklok is back! Metal wedding!

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y222/Abagadro/metalocalypse4.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Selby on May 18, 2008, 08:38:44 PM
So... The Simpsons... does anyone even watch this show anymore?  I caught an episode tonight and outside of a few sight gags and giggles here and there, I kep wondering what else was on TV or what else I could be doing...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 19, 2008, 09:24:36 AM
The Office season finale was fantastic. How they can continue to take such a small concept and stretch it out more than a full season and actually make the characters grow is fabulous understated writing. Especially when the shows are still funny.

The Dollhouse show looks good, but it does remind me a bit of the River storyline from Serenity/Firefly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on May 19, 2008, 03:52:00 PM
I would HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend somehow seeing the original British version of Life on Mars before this drivel comes out:

http://www.denofgeek.com/television/55121/life_on_mars_us_trailer.html (http://www.denofgeek.com/television/55121/life_on_mars_us_trailer.html)

It's in my top 5 Shows of all time, which are roughly (in no particular order):
Life on Mars (British)
Sports Night
Lost (don't hate)
Twin Peaks
Monty Python/Seinfeld


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Samwise on May 19, 2008, 05:53:24 PM
Latest episode of Dr. Who was entertaining, remarkably silly and clearly a "filler" but I still enjoyed myself. Don't know how many of you are UK/Proxied into BBC iPlayer but it's probably a better way of killing an hour than a lot of TV. Only if you are definitely a Dr. Who fan though, I don't think it'd really grab anyone who didn't already love it.

I've been loving this entire season.  And here's hoping we see more of Jenny.   :pedobear:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on May 19, 2008, 07:13:07 PM
^^ We are only on the Sontaran Stratagem 2 parter.  With blue balls since the conclusion isn't for TWO WEEKS ARGH.  BSG is the same way.  Luckily Sarah Jane Adventures are always 2 parters so I just wait till my DVR has both half hours and watch them back to back, but to do this to BSG and Who?

FUCK YOU SCI FI.  *Nerdrage*


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on May 20, 2008, 04:25:05 AM
I got the impression that they set Jenny up for a spin-off, though having her show up a few more times in the main series wouldn't be overly shocking. It would at least mean there'd be female talent to rival David Tennant  :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on May 20, 2008, 04:59:50 AM
[I've been loving this entire season.  And here's hoping we see more of Jenny.   :pedobear:
A couple of years and 50 pounds and they'll give her, her own series.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 20, 2008, 07:26:12 AM
Quote
The Office season finale was fantastic.

Amen. The whole episode was just pitch perfect, with the exception of the very last scene. While a great twist, it seems incredibly out of character for both people involved.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on May 20, 2008, 08:27:17 AM
Any must see television out there?

Unfortunately apart from all of the CSIs no network here in germany touches quality entertainment with a ten foot pole.

24 got cancelled
Battlestar Galactica got cancelled
Heroes is the next candidate to be cancelled

So I am looking for imports to fuel my love for american television. So what would you recommend?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on May 20, 2008, 08:32:39 AM
Rome, if you haven't seen it yet. Especially season 1 -- truly one of the best television shows ever made.

Three Sheets, if you can get that.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on May 20, 2008, 08:43:22 AM
After the last two episodes especially, House.  The Office, Pysch, Weeds, Entourage, The Tudors, Greys Anatomy, Ugly Betty, Scrubs, Chuck, Reaper, Flight of the Conchords, and those are just the shows that are running currently.  You could always get DVDs of old throwbacks like Alias, Sliders, Twin Peaks, Sports Night, or Arrested Development.

Of course you also know that Heroes and 24 are still going on so you could always acquire them, and BSG is on its last season so the DVDs will come out soon enough.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 20, 2008, 09:36:10 AM
Quote
You could always get DVDs of old throwbacks like Alias, Sliders, Twin Peaks, Sports Night, or Arrested Development.

Last time I looked, Sports Night was no longer in DVD production. I tried to order it from a place that still reported it in stock, but got the inevitable "Duh, our website was out of date" mail soon after. I KNEW I should have bought it myself, but I thought it was in the perfect price range for a gift, so I left it on my Amazon Gift List for years.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on May 20, 2008, 09:46:47 AM
I didn't know!

Schild has the DVDs and I have a DVD burner, just sayin'.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 20, 2008, 10:40:08 AM
I would HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend somehow seeing the original British version of Life on Mars before this drivel comes out:

http://www.denofgeek.com/television/55121/life_on_mars_us_trailer.html (http://www.denofgeek.com/television/55121/life_on_mars_us_trailer.html)

Oh, for fuck's sake. NO. NO. NO NO NO NO NO. Fuck no.

Too much fucking comedy, too many laughs and cheeky '70's jokes. I like Lenny Clarke and the guy playing the boss cop, but FUCK NO. They will totally fuck up what is an incredible series. Stop it. Just stop. If you want to put on a hit, buy the rights to the original and run that shit on American television.

Fuckheads.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on May 20, 2008, 01:39:04 PM
Quote
The Office season finale was fantastic.

Amen. The whole episode was just pitch perfect, with the exception of the very last scene. While a great twist, it seems incredibly out of character for both people involved.
Haven't you been watching the sexual expliots of the GOP?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 20, 2008, 08:42:47 PM
So I am looking for imports to fuel my love for american television. So what would you recommend?
Bones.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on May 20, 2008, 08:56:58 PM
I should have said this much earlier, but I just finished watching the first season finale of Reaper on the CW.  Fantastic show, highly recommend the season when its released on DvD. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on May 20, 2008, 10:15:35 PM
Bones.

Yeah, except that season finale? Killed off much of my goodwill. The contrast to the superb House finale made it particularly jarring.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on May 21, 2008, 01:38:37 AM
Yeah I agree. That came out of nowhere. And the beginning part with Booth was totally stupid. I blame it on the strike :awesome_for_real: and it's still my favorite show. They should've just ended with Bones's dad -- that was a very good episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on May 21, 2008, 03:44:13 AM
Quote
You could always get DVDs of old throwbacks like Alias, Sliders, Twin Peaks, Sports Night, or Arrested Development.

Last time I looked, Sports Night was no longer in DVD production. I tried to order it from a place that still reported it in stock, but got the inevitable "Duh, our website was out of date" mail soon after. I KNEW I should have bought it myself, but I thought it was in the perfect price range for a gift, so I left it on my Amazon Gift List for years.

http://www.tvsquad.com/2008/05/20/sports-night-10th-anniversary-box-set-coming-this-fall/


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on May 21, 2008, 07:38:38 AM
Quote
You could always get DVDs of old throwbacks like Alias, Sliders, Twin Peaks, Sports Night, or Arrested Development.

Last time I looked, Sports Night was no longer in DVD production. I tried to order it from a place that still reported it in stock, but got the inevitable "Duh, our website was out of date" mail soon after. I KNEW I should have bought it myself, but I thought it was in the perfect price range for a gift, so I left it on my Amazon Gift List for years.

http://www.tvsquad.com/2008/05/20/sports-night-10th-anniversary-box-set-coming-this-fall/

 :thumbs_up: :hulk_rock: :inluv: :rock: :rock_hard:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on May 23, 2008, 03:36:30 PM
10 hours of digitally remastered Flying Circus being shown this Monday from 9 am EDT to 7 pm EDT on BBC America.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Samwise on May 23, 2008, 03:56:42 PM
The problem with Monty Python's Flying Circus is that most of it sucked.  I say this as someone who bought the complete DVD set.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on May 23, 2008, 04:02:51 PM
The problem with Monty Python's Flying Circus is that most of it sucked.  I say this as someone who bought the complete DVD set.
I hate that set.  All the annoying unskippable bits at the front, the really annoying animations they use to navigate the menu (which itself is terrible), no simple "play all" ability.

And yes only about one third of the sketches are funny, but those one third are really good.  That last season without Cleese was a total write off though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on May 23, 2008, 04:10:44 PM
I just watch "And Now for Something Completely Different". It's most of their best skits... Hell, I think there's only one great one I've seen that isn't in it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 25, 2008, 08:35:47 PM
Bones.

Yeah, except that season finale? Killed off much of my goodwill. The contrast to the superb House finale made it particularly jarring.

Yeah. What... the... fuck? The main draw of Bones is how those characters interact in the context of the mysteries. Throwing the identity of the apprentice in there like they did (trying not to spoil it) was so out of fucking left field it was playing soccer in some other fucking city. It made no sense, much less sense than one of the other red herrings they threw out there during that episode. Not to mention it had no real bread crumbs in any of the other stories on that serial killer during the season. I really wonder if the next season is going to have any steam at all. I also hated that they removed that character with all the pomp and fanfare of a character getting killed heroically in the line of duty, as if they completely forgot what he did. That episode was a major misstep.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on May 26, 2008, 07:50:17 AM
I also very much disliked the last episode of Bones.  Not because I liked that character, which I did, but because it almost seemed like an afterthought.  I've watched the entire series so far and it just seemed bizarre. 

Also, after the finale of Lost, I guess we should just post the same stuff over and over in this thread.  Right?  In keeping with the festive re-run series... or how TV people like to call them:  Encore Presentations.   Those dumbasses.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Samwise on May 26, 2008, 08:54:15 AM
I just watch "And Now for Something Completely Different". It's most of their best skits... Hell, I think there's only one great one I've seen that isn't in it.

Live at the Hollywood Bowl is also a good one (the best IMO).  Between those two you've got almost all the good sketches (Dead Parrot not included).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on May 26, 2008, 08:56:51 AM
I think I've seen that once. It's not a late one, when Graham Chapman died, right?

Dead Parrot is in Something Different. The best version too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on May 26, 2008, 12:35:03 PM
I think I've seen that once. It's not a late one, when Graham Chapman died, right?

Dead Parrot is in Something Different. The best version too.

No, Grahm was alive for the Hollywood Bowl shows they did in the early 80's.  Cleese makes reference to it often, including on the show I think you're thinking of; the one where they have Grahm's "ashes" in the urn with the picture of his face on it?  That was the reunion show in Aspen in '88 hosted by Robert Klein. It's on the Monty Python Live! (http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Monty_Python_Live/60030581?trkid=222336&lnkctr=srchrd-sr&strkid=845099615_0_0) collection. (along with the mocumentery from the mid 80's hosted by Steve Martin that was pretty amusing. )

This collection (http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Monty_Python_The_Life_of_Python_Vol._2/60020318?trkid=188469) was also pretty amusing as I just finished watching it two weeks ago.  Only one of the German episodes, but Palin's spoof of his travel show where he goes and visits several of the locations where the skits were filmed some 25-30 years later was pretty good.  Only worth it if you're really into Python, though.  If you're just looking for a collection of sketches don't bother.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on May 26, 2008, 01:12:43 PM
I actually thought the sketch versions in Something Different were a bit flat, almost like they were too rehearsed. I much preferred the Nudge Nudge, Dead Parrot and Lumberjack skits from Flying Circus to the Something Different versions.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on May 26, 2008, 01:18:05 PM
Man, all of those are better on Something Different, I think. Maybe it just depends on what you saw first.

I have every nuance of Different's version of Lumberjack seared into my brain. I could not see it any other way.


Yeah, that Robert Klein show was the one I was talking about. I remember those Hollywood versions now though.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on May 27, 2008, 08:09:43 AM
The whole Kevin-as-a-retard thing was absolutely hilarious.
For some reason I couldn't stop laughing at those scenes.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on June 01, 2008, 07:12:21 AM
11:30 pm

(http://www.xoospace.com/myspace/backgrounds/25501.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 01, 2008, 09:04:26 AM
NEW VENTURE BROTHERS?  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on June 01, 2008, 11:55:28 AM
Hell yeah.  Thanks for the reminder, I'd forgotten. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on June 01, 2008, 08:41:01 PM
Fuck, Venture Bros. is awesome.

Number 21 (talking about Brock Sampson):  Maybe he can kill with words.  Maybe his name is a killing word?

I fucking lost it there.


Monarch quoted the "Kill them all.  God will recognize his own." line from the Albigensian Crusade as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 01, 2008, 09:25:57 PM
Speaking of awesome refs, how about Metalocalypse riffing on Fitzcarraldo.  I wonder how many Dethklok fans like Werner Hertzog.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on June 02, 2008, 05:42:39 AM
NEW VENTURE BROTHERS?  :awesome_for_real:

Nice. We don't actually get Venture Bros. up here, so I wathed torrents of the entire thing and just finished season two about a week ago. Perfect timing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 02, 2008, 08:39:11 AM
Did anyone watch that Andromeda Strain miniseries on A&E?

So... many... bad... things. It started out well in the first two hours, but just absolutely fell apart on the second episode. The last 30 minutes were just decidely painful piling on, one calamity after another after another. Who builds a vertical maintenance tunnel over a nuclear cooling vent 4 stories high WITHOUT A FUCKING LADDER? Not to mention all the unresolved and unanswered plot twists around the origin of the virus. A lot of decent talent and effects put into a really shitty shit shit shit story.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 02, 2008, 10:20:54 AM
I liked the original, so I endured the A&E version. I want that time back. At least I had beer to console me.

The bit about flashing lights making the oriental guy epileptic was so tacked on and meaningless, when it was one of the critical plot points of the original. Eh, it was just awful piled on a stack of bad.

And it came through a wormhole from the future?  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 02, 2008, 02:48:05 PM
That was produced by Ridley Scott.  He just doesn't care anymore, does he?  Do you know that if you buy the DvD you can hear them say "crap" the two times it was bleeped?   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on June 02, 2008, 03:34:04 PM
Is the original one released on DVD? The andromeda strain and Alien left distinct impressions in my childhood


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on June 02, 2008, 06:25:29 PM
Veronica Cartwright almost throwing up for real duing the chestburster scene in Alien is the single greatest line of dialogue ever recorded.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 03, 2008, 06:37:51 AM
That was produced by Ridley Scott.  He just doesn't care anymore, does he?  Do you know that if you buy the DvD you can hear them say "crap" the two times it was bleeped?   :awesome_for_real:

What was weird was that they bleeped the cursing in the first 2 hours (even on such ok words as "ass") but then the second two hours they just let it go. The whole production was just really slapdash and sloppy. I want that time back.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 03, 2008, 06:43:14 AM
I think the worst part about it was how it highlighted a change from the way movies were made in the 60s and 70s. I loved the long edits, the dialogue-heavy scripts, often you had to pay attention to figure out what was going on. Now it's all beautiful people (well, except maybe Ricky Shroeder) and action scenes and edits chopped all to hell. Movie making has gone to shit.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on June 03, 2008, 08:57:47 AM
Yeah, it was bad bad bad. It started out OK, and then got progressively worse. They kept plot points from the previous movie (epilepsy) but the ceased having any meaning.

So many plot holes, and they built the superbug up to be stronger and stronger and finally just deus ex machina'd it away.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 03, 2008, 10:50:01 AM
What? I'm sure there were enough helicopters to spray the magic technology spray over several states and not miss a single spot!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 03, 2008, 10:57:40 AM
And of course it would immediately kill the virus and turn every piece of flora and fauna back to its natural color!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on June 07, 2008, 02:47:45 PM
They're putting the new eps of the Venture Bros. online early (http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=8a25c3921a57f78e011a5a022517007b)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 08, 2008, 07:04:24 PM
New mini-series on the U.S. Space program starts tonight on Discovery. Called When We Left Earth. Lots of new, internal NASA footage. The first episode was really good so expect the rest to be as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 09, 2008, 05:36:34 AM
Don't beat me up if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that I saw it advertised that it'll be on On Demand, too.  Which would be awesome since I always miss at least one episode of any mini-series.  It's like a tradition or something. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 10, 2008, 05:50:36 AM
Well I finally caught up on all the LOST episodes by watching them online. This season finale didn't really do much for me outside of Sun's performance when the boat exploded. Honestly, it was all very predictable because of the time travel element. There wasn't a lot they could do with all the flashback/forward nonesense they've been pulling this year. I suspected who was in the coffin from the moment I saw that scene, but the finale did little more for me than to go, WTF about the underground moving lair.

I'm pretty sure they are going to cancel the show before they answer any of the questions they keep avoiding:

1 - What the hell is the smoke monster and where did it come from?
2 - Why does this island possess such unique properties?
3 - Why was there a polar bear on the island?
4 - What's the deal with all the dead people that keep showing up?
5 - Who are these people that never seem to age and move from character to character with seemingly effortless ease?
6 - What is Ben's real backstory? (the only one I really care about) We get endless nonesense about every other dumbass on the island except him.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 10, 2008, 05:53:25 AM
At least one of those questions has already been answered...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 10, 2008, 05:55:08 AM
At least one of those questions has already been answered...

Care to fill me in?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 10, 2008, 06:05:27 AM
I have been enjoying this show much more since I stopped trying to figure out the story.  Srsly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on June 10, 2008, 06:13:31 AM
The polar bears were brought to the island for experiments and were kept in the pens that Sawyer and Vagina were held captive in.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on June 10, 2008, 06:30:24 AM
Very happy with season 4.  Plenty of action, little downtime.  Still got 2 more seasons to go.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 10, 2008, 07:14:46 AM
The polar bears were brought to the island for experiments and were kept in the pens that Sawyer and Vagina were held captive in.

Fair enough, I must have glossed over that fact. Still, what the hell is up with the moving island?

Next time on LOST: The island enters an amateur magic competition...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 10, 2008, 07:26:01 AM
I think we know most of Ben's back story too, all we're really missing is his falling out with Rousseau and how he went from traitor to leader with Jacob's blessing.

But yes those other questions will never be answered with any satisfaction, we have to accept that the ending will either be incomplete or really stupid and just enjoy the ride until we hit that brick wall.

As for my guess on:

4 - What's the deal with all the dead people that keep showing up?
5 - Who are these people that never seem to age and move from character to character with seemingly effortless ease?

I fear it might be a time travel thing.  The dead people have traveled forward before their deaths and that one guy with the mascara travels backwards.

Edit: They might even explain the island moving via time travel.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on June 10, 2008, 07:32:19 AM
I don't know why you guys think that.  This season has been awesome, and they are moving forward with answering questions faster than they ever have.  They got the studios to give them an exact date to end by, and now they are writing ahead with a full plot to have everything worked out.  I'm confident it will all be explained (minus some random side crap they wrote in back in season 2/3 that they just abandon).  They've been revealing more and more about the island, and I already have a much much better idea now of how the island works and the story behind the others.  Obviously just theories, but they given us so much more information to work with that I feel much confident in working it out.

The show is on fire.  Loved this entire season.  Very confident now that they will wrap it up in the next two seasons perfectly.

We NEED to have more series that have a finite start/end date.  You just can't make a truly deep storyline for a series if you have no idea when its going to end and have to keep making up shit along the way.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Miasma on June 10, 2008, 07:35:51 AM
We're agreeing the season was great, I don't think anyone has said otherwise.  But they have done so much bizarre stuff there is no way they will be able to clearly answer the "how" questions without resorting to something really weak like aliens or ghosts or time travel.

They seem to be headed on the time travel route which is the lesser of the evils but is still a cop out.

And for every answer they give they also create two new questions.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on June 10, 2008, 08:04:57 AM
We're agreeing the season was great, I don't think anyone has said otherwise.  But they have done so much bizarre stuff there is no way they will be able to clearly answer the "how" questions without resorting to something really weak like aliens or ghosts or time travel.

They seem to be headed on the time travel route which is the lesser of the evils but is still a cop out.

And for every answer they give they also create two new questions.
If its presented in a compelling story, I don't see how its a cop out.  We have clearly left the realm of mundane realty.  As long it's a good story and doesn't contradict itself, Lost could go to Mystism or Science Fiction to explain what is happening.  Finding out a mundane explanation would be the biggest cop out.  "It was all an elaborate prank!"  "Mushrooms of the island release hallucinogens!" "It's just a videogame!"



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 10, 2008, 08:52:46 AM
We're agreeing the season was great, I don't think anyone has said otherwise.  But they have done so much bizarre stuff there is no way they will be able to clearly answer the "how" questions without resorting to something really weak like aliens or ghosts or time travel.

They seem to be headed on the time travel route which is the lesser of the evils but is still a cop out.

How is any of those a copout? From the minute we heard the RAAWWWRRGGGG ZOMG DINOSAUR in the first episode, it was clear there was going to be some kind of bizarre, time-travelling/aliens/mystical shit going on. Dead people walking in the 3rd episode? Polar bears in the tropics? A crippled man walking while claiming the island is speaking to him?

I'm not sure what kind of "non-cop-out" explanation you were expecting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on June 10, 2008, 09:04:06 AM
It was all the dream of some autistic kid!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 10, 2008, 09:15:37 AM
Now see THAT would have been a copout.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on June 10, 2008, 09:31:05 AM
Yeah, basically what they said.  Time travel/sci-fi is perfectly fine, if its done well.  And they way they've shown it so far (with Desmond) has been really bad ass and well done.  I like the way its going.

And I don't know how you think they can't tie up everything in two more seasons.  I feel if they tried, they could easily do it in one.  But 2 should be more than enough, especially now that they have focus.

Of course they could easily still fuck it all to hell and gone, but after season 4, I have a lot more faith, heh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 10, 2008, 12:12:46 PM
Polar bears were used to turn the donkey wheel that moved the island because it was so cold in there.  That's why Charlotte found the polarbear skeleton with a Dharma colar in Tunesia, the same place that Ben ended up after he activated the machine.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: lac on June 10, 2008, 12:35:46 PM
Quote
Polar bears were used to turn the donkey wheel that moved the island because it was so cold in there.  That's why Charlotte found the polarbear skeleton with a Dharma colar in Tunesia, the same place that Ben ended up after he activated the machine.
Erm, this is Lost, which started with a bunch of people that planecrashed onto an island?
I saw the first few episodes, back then, and it seemed really well made.

Now they have polar bears turning tropical islands and machines that catapult people to tunesia?

Damn.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on June 11, 2008, 10:59:31 AM
Well, the polar bears turning the wheel part is just a theory... pretty good one though.  It actually kinda makes sense, for all its silliness.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on June 11, 2008, 12:58:40 PM
(http://www.explosm.net/db/files/Comics/Dave/comicjackface1.png)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 11, 2008, 08:17:23 PM
Well, the polar bears turning the wheel part is just a theory... pretty good one though.  It actually kinda makes sense, for all its silliness.

Yeah it makes a lot of sense, but why the hell is there a wheel, why does the island need to be moving around, how does it work, where does it go....AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on June 11, 2008, 10:20:00 PM
I'm still predicting a Ubik ending, or An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge for the more literate among us.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on June 11, 2008, 11:08:43 PM
I'm still predicting a Ubik ending, or An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge for the more literate among us.  :awesome_for_real:
I'm pretty sure they wouldn't dare do that at this point.  They have already said they are all still alive in interviews.

Though funny enough, one of the things that really jumped out to me was a scene when Locke was first looking around the hatch, at the book shelf.  Right next to the book he grabbed was "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge".  I remember thinking YOU BASTARDS.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Margalis on June 12, 2008, 12:51:06 AM
The guy in Owl Creek Bridge was alive - for another 5 seconds or so.

Closing shot of Lost finale - plane breaking up, screams, fade to black. You heard it here first!

Honestly, the real ending I expect is some crazy hodgepodge of shit that makes no sense.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 12, 2008, 07:22:26 AM
It has to be something with time travel, honestly. It's the only corner they have painted themselves into.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on June 12, 2008, 07:29:43 AM
Thats actually what I'm thinking as well.  I think theres a fair chance it will be kind of a cross with what Margalis thinks, and through some sort of wierd time/reality altering event at the end everything will be undone like it never happened, thus bringing back everybody who's been killed, and the original plane never crashes.  Or something, who knows.

But I don't think time travel is a corner they painted themselves into, and I think it would be totally awesome for them to use it.   :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 12, 2008, 07:44:21 AM
The island exists in a nexus of time and space. It's not quite in this time/space, and as a result time works differently on the island, hence Dan's physics experiments, Nestor Carbonell's lack of aging, etc. The dead people are the energies/souls of the dead that are given form by the island's unique dimensional placement.

Or sum'in.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on June 12, 2008, 08:57:19 AM
So, having not watched Lost since half way through season two, it's safe to assume that the stupid show still makes absolutely no fucking sense?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 12, 2008, 10:22:26 AM
It makes more sense now, but only if you've really been paying attention.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on June 12, 2008, 11:14:12 AM
There's still very little that has been clearly explained, but an overall picture and sense of direction is starting to emerge nonetheless. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 17, 2008, 06:45:46 AM
Is that the show where Fonzie jumps over the polar bear on an island?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 18, 2008, 05:54:15 AM
Just saw the pilot of The Fringe. Should be good. Deals with a scientist that studied fringe sciences until he was locked up. Teleportation and reanimation and whatnot. Also, some sort of rambaldi-esque conspiracy called The Pattern.

Looks like JJ has still got it despite Lost being a pile of shit. Caution: If you don't like lost, you're right. If you like lost, this is Trollbait and you're doing it wrong.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on June 18, 2008, 06:05:11 AM
I will see how this develops as well. But another worldwide conspiracy in another of his series? I'm waiting for the unified worldwide conspiracy that ties them all together.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 18, 2008, 09:50:31 AM
I will see how this develops as well. But another worldwide conspiracy in another of his series? I'm waiting for the unified worldwide conspiracy that ties them all together.

This isn't so much worldwide as it is corporate conspiracy working with dirty science on the fringe of black magic type shit.

In other words, it's like modern day lovecraft. Sort of.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 18, 2008, 09:55:36 AM
I never heard of Fringe but I want to see it, I think.  Did you steal the pilot or is it available somewhere?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 18, 2008, 10:01:39 AM
i found such a thing on the interwab some member of the press leaked it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on June 18, 2008, 11:45:29 AM
Modern day Lovecraft sounds neat. I'll give it a try.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 18, 2008, 03:00:40 PM
It's not modern day lovecraft it's just obviously inspired a bit by it. Or rather, some of the horrible things this scientist tinkered with is part of it. It's also very updated, cybernetics manufacturer. Also, some political undertones about the state of world affairs, which could enter the boring side if they continue. But theoretically JJ Abrams shouldn't fuck it up. Theoretically. Unfortunately, it's being marketed... very badly.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 18, 2008, 11:04:46 PM
What network is this supposed to be on?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on June 18, 2008, 11:13:10 PM
FOX.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on June 18, 2008, 11:15:13 PM
It's fucked then.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 18, 2008, 11:17:28 PM
Heh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on June 18, 2008, 11:22:26 PM
That's only guarenteed if it's on Fridays, otherwise it has a chance.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 20, 2008, 05:25:06 AM
Life on Mars US Remake isn't bad. Not great. But not bad. First episode is easily found.

In Plain Sight isn't that great.

Season 1 of Secret Diaries of a Call Girl UK wasn't great.

I don't like not having a job.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 20, 2008, 06:45:10 AM
I don't like not having a job.
Awright, that's enough QQ drama out of you!

 :awesome_for_real:



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 20, 2008, 06:46:06 AM
I don't like not having a job.
Awright, that's enough QQ drama out of you!

 :awesome_for_real:

I should've said "I don't like having a job, I'm willing to watch boring TV I'd never watch otherwise." >_>


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 20, 2008, 08:04:57 AM
Life on Mars US Remake isn't bad. Not great. But not bad. First episode is easily found.

Is it not great/not bad on its own, or in comparison to the UK version?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 20, 2008, 08:54:10 AM
I should've said "I don't like having a job, I'm willing to watch boring TV I'd never watch otherwise." >_>
Why are you trying to make this thread all about you?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tebonas on June 20, 2008, 11:28:37 AM
Its crap in comparison to the UK version. Especially the actor that plays Sam Tyler. You don't give a fuck about him and hope he dies in his coma.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on June 23, 2008, 06:57:54 AM
Venture Bros. continues to kick mighty amounts of ass.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 24, 2008, 07:21:46 AM
I am still sad no one here is watching The Tudors (http://www.sho.com/site/tudors/home.do).

Its a really fantastic show.

(http://a.abcnews.com/images/Entertainment/ht_Tudors1_080326_ssv.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 24, 2008, 07:42:36 AM
I am still sad no one here is watching The Tudors (http://www.sho.com/site/tudors/home.do).

Its a really fantastic show.
Except for the abysmal acting of the lead character and Anne, sure.

We were watching it, but my fucking DVR decided to record over four episodes I had marked Do Not Delete. Also fucked our last two episodes of John Adams, which featured some stellar acting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on June 24, 2008, 08:44:10 AM
I'm incredibly, INCREDIBLY cheap and refuse to pay for "Home Box Office" or any of the "Movie" channels because the last time I did (~2000) I got 2 months of movies I didn't want to see back in 1989 when they were first released.    Yeah, $19.95 a month for that? No thx.  Now with Netflix on demand from the 'net in addition to the disc service I see no need to do anything but wait for it to come out on DVD and watch it then.  For about 1/2 the price and with no interruptions.  :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 24, 2008, 08:45:17 AM
I am still sad no one here is watching The Tudors (http://www.sho.com/site/tudors/home.do).

Its a really fantastic show.
Except for the abysmal acting of the lead character and Anne, sure.

I disagree. Its not steller, but the show as a whole is good, and i liked the lead in Gormenghast, and this.

I'm incredibly, INCREDIBLY cheap and refuse to pay for "Home Box Office" or any of the "Movie" channels because the last time I did (~2000) I got 2 months of movies I didn't want to see back in 1989 when they were first released.    Yeah, $19.95 a month for that? No thx.  Now with Netflix on demand from the 'net in addition to the disc service I see no need to do anything but wait for it to come out on DVD and watch it then.  For about 1/2 the price and with no interruptions.  :drill:

First season is out on DvD...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 24, 2008, 08:58:03 AM
Venture Bros. continues to kick mighty amounts of ass.

Yes. "THE SHRUBS HAVE KNIVES!!!" God that was so full of awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 24, 2008, 08:58:50 AM
Heh, we switched recently from HBO to Showtime. 

I like the Tudors, it's not my favorite though.  If you know a little history, there's no surprise to the plot.  :drill:  I think the problem with the actors that play Anne/Henry as they're forced to do a lot of weird shit at times to force the show back on track towards where the actual history says they should be.   They've made some odd decisions at times with character motivations.

Dexter, however, is pure gold.  First season got a little offtrack toward the middle, but finished strongly.  Despite the major deus ex machina moment in season 2, it was enjoyable from start to finish.

Need to got caught up with Weeds before we start up on that.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 24, 2008, 09:19:14 AM
Best thing on Showtime is Californication... Hell, best thing around period, besides Rome. Too bad it's only one season, and will probably remain so.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 24, 2008, 09:19:48 AM
Need to got caught up with Weeds before we start up on that.

Same here, i seemed to have missed an entire season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 24, 2008, 09:20:16 AM
Californication is already halfway through filming the second season, airs end of september, same week season 1 dvd box set comes out. Unless you were talking about Rome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 24, 2008, 09:22:31 AM
Wha..? Fuck yeah.

Yes, I was talking about Cali. It ended on what could be interpreted as a final note, so I figured it was over with.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 24, 2008, 09:27:49 AM
It was originally signed for 2 seasons so, I'd imagine it gained enough viewership to not break that contract. It was a fantastic show, but entirely too fucking uneven. And the guy that plays Bill sucks. Glad they practically ditched him, literally.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 24, 2008, 09:30:02 AM
Dude, Bill is exactly what he should be. Lurch. That guy is perfect for it.

He does have his cool moment though, in one of Hank's dreams, as the Priest.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 24, 2008, 09:31:20 AM
One moment in that many episodes does not make a character. The flat chested redhead was more interesting.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 24, 2008, 09:37:30 AM
Oh, I hated that chick. That's the one thing I don't understand..Why Hank hooked up with that bitch. Not hot, not interesting. Though he broke up with her for a pretty funny reason, I guess.

Bill is way more interesting to have around. I love to hate him. Besides, without him, there isn't that hot, pyscho 16 yr old daughter of his.

[edit] They should bring back that pornstar into the show. I love crossovers.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on June 24, 2008, 10:11:09 AM
David Simon's mini-series adaptation of Generation Kill starts in a couple of weeks on HBO.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on June 24, 2008, 10:40:16 AM
It was originally signed for 2 seasons so, I'd imagine it gained enough viewership to not break that contract.

It wasn't viewership that was going to kill it, from my understanding, but the RHCP's lawsuit.  Did that finally get settled then?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 24, 2008, 11:48:25 AM
The only reason I got Showtime is for Dexter and the last episode of that is probably the last time I had the channel on.  I meant to watch Californication and Weeds but kept forgetting. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on June 24, 2008, 12:04:34 PM
Best thing on Showtime is Californication... Hell, best thing around period, besides Rome. Too bad it's only one season, and will probably remain so.

Shut your dirty mouth before you find yourself in little garbage bags in Miami harbor!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 24, 2008, 12:10:55 PM
Hmm. Why's that?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Brogarn on June 25, 2008, 05:40:36 AM
Hmm. Why's that?

Dexter reference.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 25, 2008, 06:44:41 AM
Watched the first two episodes of Californication and first 3 of Weeds yesterday.

Great stuff.  Weeds wasn't as awesome as the build up, but Californication was hilarious and my gods... the boobs.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 26, 2008, 04:24:45 AM
"I Survived a Japanese Gameshow" is going to do NOTHING for Japanese American race relations.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on June 26, 2008, 04:42:13 AM
Are they actually Japanese gameshows or just made up ones?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on June 26, 2008, 04:43:14 AM
Oh, it's an actual show filmed at Toho studios in Japan. Like, an american reality show where it's the same contestants each week taking part in classic japanese tv gameshow events. It's fairly brilliant. The audience is japanese and the host is japanese.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on June 26, 2008, 06:44:00 AM
The Japanese probably won't care much as long as Clive James isn't hosting it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on June 26, 2008, 07:30:16 AM
"I Survived a Japanese Gameshow" is going to do NOTHING for Japanese American race relations.

I'll watch the actual shows on G4. Ninja Warrior and Unbeatable Banzuke are 100000000X better than any American gameshow. Ever. A gameshow with an obstacle course so hard that an Olympic gold medalist in gymnatics can't complete the course? A show that has been on for close to a decade and has had one winner?

The Japanese make American Gladiator look like a bunch of pussies.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 26, 2008, 08:29:14 AM
I'm fairly positive there is no such thing as "pussy" on American Gladiators.

(http://www.geekologie.com/2007/08/24/american-gladiators.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 26, 2008, 09:52:50 AM
Are you being literal due to the assumption of rampant steroid use?  :awesome_for_real:

Anyhoo, finished Californication.  Loved it.  Show set some pretty high standards for itself, so I was a bit disappointed in a few parts that felt recycled/cliche.  And in general, I hate using a wedding as a final episode. And.. I thought the flat redhead was fairly hot with her hair straight. 

I imagine everything will just fall to shit for Hank as soon as season 2 starts.  Without going into spoilers, there's still a big anvil hanging over his head that could come crashing down at any moment and there's still the whole unresolved literary issue.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 26, 2008, 10:01:43 AM
I'm pretty sure I know what anvil you're talking about.. But not quite.

I just figured the writing issue was taken care of. He always said he was blocked only because of Karen.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on June 26, 2008, 11:15:40 AM

I just figured the writing issue was taken care of. He always said he was blocked only because of Karen.

Referring more to the unsettled status of Fucking & Punching: A Love Story.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Brogarn on June 27, 2008, 10:58:34 AM
Is anyone else in corny love with that damn Discovery Channel commercial where they're all chanting boom di yada or some such? It gets stuck in my head but I'm actually ok with it. It's so freakin happy, I can't help but bob my head back and forth while chanting boom di yada. Maybe it's some kind of mind control.  :ye_gods:

 :tinfoil:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on June 27, 2008, 11:03:03 AM
I like the Boom Di Yada commercial. The wife hates it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on June 27, 2008, 11:43:33 AM
I'm fairly positive there is no such thing as "pussy" on American Gladiators.

<image snipped>

Watch Ninja Warrior and get back to me. None of those people would finish the first stage, let alone all four.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on June 27, 2008, 12:21:13 PM
*Whoosh* ---- Right over Rigg's head.  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on June 27, 2008, 12:22:59 PM
I'm fairly positive there is no such thing as "pussy" on American Gladiators.

<image snipped>

Watch Ninja Warrior and get back to me. None of those people would finish the first stage, let alone all four.
(https://dl.getdropbox.com/u/42529/sarchasm10zkcg8.jpg)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Riggswolfe on June 27, 2008, 12:40:23 PM
*Whoosh* ---- Right over Rigg's head.  :-)

I see what you did there. Sheesh, I don't usually miss those things. More caffeine! Stat!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on June 30, 2008, 04:08:26 PM
Tin Man is better and cheaper than Valium.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on July 07, 2008, 12:04:44 AM
Not necessarily recommending it, but NBC is about to hit the US with 14 confidently-commissioned episodes of a comedy called Kath & Kim. It's a US remake of an Australian series (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niE7yY518fE), much like they remade the UK series The Office. Now is your last opportunity to google "kath and kim" and see how the internet looks before there was only ever a US series, so you can be oldschool.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on July 07, 2008, 12:53:51 PM
Hmm.  I think Rusty is going to be happy he never made it with Dr. Quymn.  She looks like another child of Jonas Venture Sr. to me.  Genetic sexual attraction indeed.  Anyway another excellant episode.  Dean is becoming quite the stud.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 07, 2008, 01:11:43 PM
For some reason Brock's line of "thanks for a new low" had me absolutely busting up.  Warburton consistenrty just rocks the delivery on that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on July 07, 2008, 04:25:57 PM
While it's been a bit weird to have so much flashback type stuff shown this season, Venture Bros. has been stellar. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 08, 2008, 09:03:52 AM
"The Power of Christ compels you! The power of Christ compels you!"

God that episode was wintastic.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on July 08, 2008, 09:19:52 AM
My favorite line was actually at the very end:

"Where were you?"
"Getting my ass handed to me by a #@%$ orangutan!"


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 08, 2008, 10:15:35 AM
Hmm.  I think Rusty is going to be happy he never made it with Dr. Quymn.  She looks like another child of Jonas Venture Sr. to me.  Genetic sexual attraction indeed.  Anyway another excellant episode.  Dean is becoming quite the stud.

Yah, they pretty heavily hint that Quymn is Rusty's half-sister.  Both having sets of twins (which is genetic) and muscle-bound bodyguards,  both have parent issues/insecurities, both seem to kind of ignore the kids while the bodyguard has a closer relationship with the kids, etc.

I mean, besides the fact that her father is obviously gay and her mother was carrying on an affair with Jonas Venture Sr.

I like the way they're taking Dean in a kind of geek chic direction.  Much more interesting than the "standard nerd" that he was in the early series.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 14, 2008, 09:17:28 PM
If you aren't watching Generation Kill you should be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 14, 2008, 10:27:09 PM
Does it glorify war with a bunch of "Hoorah", like, say Jarhead?

Or is it tragic and bleak, like Platoon?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on July 15, 2008, 12:32:57 AM
http://www.adultswim.com/americaloveslists/vb_brockbeatdowns/index.html

10 best Brock beatdowns, #6 almost made me cry.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on July 15, 2008, 12:51:32 AM
Fuck you non US blocked videos!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 15, 2008, 08:39:10 AM
I loved this week's Venture.

"I don't know where I am. There's just some guy down here running around screaming 'I am a firestarter!'"

Prodigy. Lulz.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 15, 2008, 09:53:15 AM
I liked the prodigy guy too but the previous eps. of the season were so awesome that this one suffered a bit in comparison, although the Blackula Hunter was great.

On Generation Kill, it's not rah-rah or a downer.  It's based on a non-fiction book and is more about how lower eschelon people have to deal with craziness coming down the chain of command and how individuals deal with the institutions they find themselves a part of.  It's also really funny but does have  have some pathos mixed in.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on July 15, 2008, 10:31:33 AM
"I go where the blacktion is."  :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Teleku on July 15, 2008, 01:50:28 PM
Does it glorify war with a bunch of "Hoorah", like, say Jarhead?

Or is it tragic and bleak, like Platoon?
How the hell did you get "glorify war" out of Jarhead?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on July 15, 2008, 02:08:37 PM
Generation Kill kicks all kinds of ass. Knowing quite a few British army types though seeing marines makes me a bit :ye_gods:. The Sergeant Major is fucking win and the inclusion of some actual incompetent officers is a nice touch. I knew a TA captain who actually reminded me a bit of the guy in this, he was more of a clueless upper class Brit type idiot though, did two tours in Afghanistan and I'm amazed noone in his squadron died.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 15, 2008, 02:57:59 PM
Does it glorify war with a bunch of "Hoorah", like, say Jarhead?

Or is it tragic and bleak, like Platoon?
How the hell did you get "glorify war" out of Jarhead?

Well, like I said, "Hoorah" sums it up. Except for the "sort of living in shambles" end, it looks like a damn 2 hr Army of One commercial. Too much posturing for my tastes. Not as bad as Blackhawk Down, but unlikeable enough. Not enough Sgt. Barnes and mangled kids. I want to see an ending to a Gulf War film like my old neighbor's story.. totally fucked in the head, hopped up on half a dozen medications, shooting the neighborhood cats, losing his family, and then trying to win his family over every other night by creeping into the driveway with a bucket of KFC chicken. Jake Gyllenhaal living in an efficiency space just doesn't quite cut it for me.

Basically, I think any war movie that doesn't include the line (however indirectly) "The horror...the horror" is a piece of shit. Give me Glory, Apocalypse Now,  Deerhunter, and a Shot Through the Heart instead.

Same goes for games. Fucking Socom.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on July 15, 2008, 03:06:01 PM
You are describing anti-war movies, which are different from war movies.

Give me Full Metal Jacket - fuck the preaching.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 15, 2008, 03:09:07 PM
Even Kubrick failed on the "horror" unfortunately... Well, except for the fat guy.

He made everything else way too fun.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on July 15, 2008, 03:14:00 PM
He had already made Paths of Glory, which is as anti-war as it gets.  Paths of Glory has the best 'the horror...' moment.

FMJ is war, no politics, just war.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on July 15, 2008, 03:23:26 PM
Even Kubrick failed on the "horror" unfortunately... Well, except for the fat guy.

He made everything else way too fun.

You're a pussy. War is kickass!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on July 15, 2008, 03:26:48 PM
In fairness not everyone who goes to war gets completely fucked up. Couple of months ago I had a few nights out with a Lt. who'd just got back from the final part of his time in Basra and he spent a good portion of the time trying to convince me to sign up. Sandhurst was apparently one of the best times of his life and apparently life in Basra wasn't too bad and everything else was awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on July 15, 2008, 03:57:04 PM
In fairness not everyone who goes to war gets completely fucked up. Couple of months ago I had a few nights out with a Lt. who'd just got back from the final part of his time in Basra and he spent a good portion of the time trying to convince me to sign up. Sandhurst was apparently one of the best times of his life and apparently life in Basra wasn't too bad and everything else was awesome.

What he said.  There are a couple of us war vets around- we are fully functional (away from this messageboard!) members of society.   :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on July 15, 2008, 04:11:10 PM
In fairness after a few nights out with him and seeing you post I'm not sure "fully functional" is the phrase I'd use :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 15, 2008, 04:37:48 PM
I have another DS vet acquaintance who seems stable, I guess, but more in a stoic kind of way. I'm not sure if that's healthy.

Even my (late) grandpa, who was a sweet old man, still had a lot of demons. He never told me a war story once, and refused to watch anything about WW2 50 years later (absolutely refused to watch Saving Private Ryan, etc..).




Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: croaker69 on July 15, 2008, 05:25:38 PM
I have another DS vet acquaintance who seems stable, I guess, but more in a stoic kind of way. I'm not sure if that's healthy.

Even my (late) grandpa, who was a sweet old man, still had a lot of demons. He never told me a war story once, and refused to watch anything about WW2 50 years later (absolutely refused to watch Saving Private Ryan, etc..).


Dude you're reaching.  Everyone has demons, even people who've never been near a war.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 15, 2008, 06:43:00 PM
I'm not reaching anywhere. Haven't even lifted a hand. I stay right where I am, and shut up. I could never relate in any way to my grandfather, or Vietnam veterans I knew or know, or whoever. Not everyone has demons like that. War's what the real monsters are made of. I mean, I can actually talk about my demons at least.

And because of all that, I match my preference for popularized portrayals of war to go in that direction. They don't seem like "politics" to me. They seem like honest enough "horrors". There must be real reasons, not politics, on why I saw people I grew up around crack and blow their brains out. They went through shit similar in these movies. And that's the about the best way I'll probably ever understand them.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on July 15, 2008, 07:34:45 PM
I'm not reaching anywhere. Haven't even lifted a hand. I stay right where I am, and shut up. I could never relate in any way to my grandfather, or Vietnam veterans I knew or know, or whoever. Not everyone has demons like that. War's what the real monsters are made of. I mean, I can actually talk about my demons at least.

And because of all that, I match my preference for popularized portrayals of war to go in that direction. They don't seem like "politics" to me. They seem like honest enough "horrors". There must be real reasons, not politics, on why I saw people I grew up around crack and blow their brains out. They went through shit similar in these movies. And that's the about the best way I'll probably ever understand them.

Don't be an idiot. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Paelos on July 15, 2008, 09:28:00 PM
I'm not reaching anywhere. Haven't even lifted a hand. I stay right where I am, and shut up. I could never relate in any way to my grandfather, or Vietnam veterans I knew or know, or whoever. Not everyone has demons like that. War's what the real monsters are made of. I mean, I can actually talk about my demons at least.

And because of all that, I match my preference for popularized portrayals of war to go in that direction. They don't seem like "politics" to me. They seem like honest enough "horrors". There must be real reasons, not politics, on why I saw people I grew up around crack and blow their brains out. They went through shit similar in these movies. And that's the about the best way I'll probably ever understand them.

What? Crack? Movies?

Movies don't help you understand people. They help you understand whatever the director was trying to say. It's not real, it's an interpretation of the real.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 16, 2008, 01:23:43 AM
I only said that they "seem like honest enough 'horrors'", not merely "politics". And "about the best way" that I could understand a war experience. Not that I do understand, or that it is the best way to understand. The whole point I'm trying to articulate there is that I don't understand. Not sure how it got turned around into the complete opposite.

The only thing I know is that I've seen more tragic aftermaths than I have seen "guys telling me how fun it was". It's going to color my impressions -- and my preferences for movies. That isn't a reason to get into a debate -- comparing what people we've met (or are) isn't even possible to get into a debate about.

Or if you guys are just pissed that I don't like Jarhead, then fuck off!  :-) I'd rather watch Iron Eagle II -- at least that one still had Chappy in it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on July 16, 2008, 05:43:46 AM
I could never relate in any way to my grandfather, or Vietnam veterans I knew or know, or whoever. Not everyone has demons like that. War's what the real monsters are made of. I mean, I can actually talk about my demons at least.
Stray, seriously. You're way off base on this one. War is only one of many avenues of horror that people won't talk about or can't cope with.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 16, 2008, 06:39:53 AM
When I was in Nam, I just laid about doing smack and eating cheesy poofs.  Everyone seemed very nice.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 16, 2008, 07:51:59 AM
Does it glorify war with a bunch of "Hoorah", like, say Jarhead?

Or is it tragic and bleak, like Platoon?
How the hell did you get "glorify war" out of Jarhead?

Well, like I said, "Hoorah" sums it up. Except for the "sort of living in shambles" end, it looks like a damn 2 hr Army of One commercial. Too much posturing for my tastes. Not as bad as Blackhawk Down, but unlikeable enough. Not enough Sgt. Barnes and mangled kids. I want to see an ending to a Gulf War film like my old neighbor's story.. totally fucked in the head, hopped up on half a dozen medications, shooting the neighborhood cats, losing his family, and then trying to win his family over every other night by creeping into the driveway with a bucket of KFC chicken. Jake Gyllenhaal living in an efficiency space just doesn't quite cut it for me.

I do believe you completely and utterly missed the point of Jarhead. Like really really badly.

It wasn't an "anti-war" movie. It wasn't about showing the horrors of war. It was about THAT war in THAT place, and how almost sanitized and far-removed from "THE HORROR THE HORROR" much of our modern military is. The main character goes in thinking he's going to be rah rah killing motherfuckers left and right and... never gets to fire a shot. It ain't Full Metal Jacket profound, but it's got its moments. It's almost war as black comedy.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 16, 2008, 09:33:09 AM
No, I knew what it was about. The rah rah still drowns out everything -- and my simple point is that I hate that shit. There are better, more respectful representations of Marines than being a bunch of perverse, chest beating retards.

Kind of the most ironic display of that kind of imagery though -- I'll give it that. It wants to focus on the chest beating, down to the very end where the guy's still all nostalgic and shit, but yet, it's one of the war stories where the guy has little excuse to beat his chest about anything. All he has are ideals. And it's not done as black comedy -- the writer/character took himself seriously.

When you say "THAT war in THAT place" though, are you just talking his specific place, or Iraq in general? Because there was plenty of "horror" there to write about apparently, from either side. I mean, sure, "action" can be a lot more remote in modern wars, but if it is, then good deal -- just don't tell me a story about it, where all I get is some stooge who was dying to shoot someone. The guys who do shoot or get shot, who do have a reason to beat their chests, are usually less idealistic about it and more cynical -- I'd rather hear what they have to say (if they'll say it). Not this GI Joe shit.

[edit] I've filled my "shit" quota for the week, I think.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 16, 2008, 10:06:28 AM
I could never relate in any way to my grandfather, or Vietnam veterans I knew or know, or whoever. Not everyone has demons like that. War's what the real monsters are made of. I mean, I can actually talk about my demons at least.
Stray, seriously. You're way off base on this one. War is only one of many avenues of horror that people won't talk about or can't cope with.

How am I off-base?

I don't understand why I have to re-qualify everything I say around here, but here goes:

"Not everyone has demons like that".

Been a victim or close by to victims of brutality, murder, and violence, for example? Then sure, I'd expect your demons to be pretty bad. They are singular, encapsulated moments of War, if you will. Private equivalents to it. I have dead friends who were victims -- but they weren't dying in my arms or anything. I saw one murder when I was 7, from a distance. Still not enough for me to relate.

I can't say that I have demons like that -- I'm not sure why saying that I lack that kind of experience is "off base" or even imagined to be a subject up for debate. I know what I have and haven't been through. That's just....how it is. Perhaps everyone is as haunted as a battle worn war veteran except me. All I know is that I can only speak for myself and say "I don't have problems like that", and won't presume to imagine that I do (and hopefully never will). If you can, then I'm sorry to hear that, but I wasn't labeling anyone but myself in the first place.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on July 16, 2008, 12:19:21 PM
When you say "THAT war in THAT place" though, are you just talking his specific place, or Iraq in general? Because there was plenty of "horror" there to write about apparently, from either side. I mean, sure, "action" can be a lot more remote in modern wars, but if it is, then good deal -- just don't tell me a story about it, where all I get is some stooge who was dying to shoot someone. The guys who do shoot or get shot, who do have a reason to beat their chests, are usually less idealistic about it and more cynical -- I'd rather hear what they have to say (if they'll say it). Not this GI Joe shit.

I meant Iraq War #1 (not the current clusterfuck). In comparison to really... every other war in existence, it was extremely sane/sanitary/antiseptic, especially from the viewpoint of the typical American. It's easy to do the rah rah nationalist patriotism when the viscera is not being experienced. And this character did not experience it. He was as much a spectator to the whole war as the American public. Of course he didn't change his idealism about the Marines... he had no real trauma to base any kind of belief-altering experience on. Neither did the American public and guess what... 10 years later and we're right back in the same place, rah rahing as a country into a war we didn't need. Sorry for getting political, but again, the movie was about war as an abstract concept, but the reality of one particular war in one particular place. I didn't see it as jingoistic at all, more of a subtle statement of the point I just made.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on July 16, 2008, 02:20:15 PM
How am I off-base?

I don't understand why I have to re-qualify everything I say around here, but here goes:

"Not everyone has demons like that".
I don't understand either -- I understood what you meant the first time.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: croaker69 on July 16, 2008, 03:07:00 PM
I have another DS vet acquaintance who seems stable, I guess, but more in a stoic kind of way. I'm not sure if that's healthy.


Sorry Stray, not trying to attack you.  The above statement just left the impression with me that you were trying to bend reality to fit your preconceived ideas about what war HAS to do to a person.  Some people just aren't that sensitive, for better or for worse.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on July 16, 2008, 03:47:30 PM
It all depends on what you see. It has nothing to do with how sensitive (read: "weak") you are.  Way to fall into stereotypes that're quietly killing GIs when they come home.

Anyone who's seen real combat doesn't like reliving it and it's all a lot can do not to relive it when they close their eyes.  This has been my experience with WWII vets straight up to current day when I can get them to talk at all. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: croaker69 on July 16, 2008, 03:49:52 PM
It all depends on what you see. It has nothing to do with how sensitive (read: "weak") you are.  Way to fall into stereotypes that're quietly killing GIs when they come home.

Anyone who's seen real combat doesn't like reliving it and it's all a lot can do not to relive it when they close their eyes.  This has been my experience with WWII vets straight up to current day when I can get them to talk at all. 

I don't see being sensitive as being weak and didn't mean it that way.  Here's another way of saying it, people are different.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 16, 2008, 07:02:01 PM
Sure, some people are different, I'll grant that, I guess. I mean, Audie Murphy supposedly saw some serious shit, but still managed to adjust and even become a minor (and charismatic) movie star after WW2. Or maybe he just had the right stimuli after the war to help him adjust, I don't know.


Back to Television...

Jesus, I've watched Californication like 6 times now. Hank Moody is my guru. I identify so much with the heartbreak and self-loathing of this guy.

"Just take it from someone who's been on the frontlines: That shit is emptier than a Michael Bay joint."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on July 20, 2008, 08:04:36 PM
"I'm... giving your robot chlamydia."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on July 21, 2008, 07:54:37 AM
"I couldn't run because I had a lighter up my ass."

"Okay, NOW I believe you're Hank's friend."


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 21, 2008, 08:02:26 AM
Watched the first two episodes of Generation Kill last night. I wasn't sold during the first, but was thoroughly digging it by the end of the second.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 21, 2008, 08:46:25 AM
I'n really enjoying it and it is staying incredibly faithful to the book. 

One fun tidbit.  The guy playing Fruity Rudy is the real Fruity Rudy.  Simon has said they couldn't find an actor good looking enough to play him who could also deliver his spacey dialogue like it needed to be.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 21, 2008, 09:21:08 AM
I heard elsewhere that the redneck racist is also a real Marine. Not sure about the veracity, but it would be depressingly appropriate.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 21, 2008, 09:33:10 AM
The guy playong Maj. Eckoff, the guy just below Godfather, was on The Wire so I looked him up on IMDB.  Turns out he is a Marine and actually commanded the 4th Light Armored Recon in Iraq in 2003.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on July 24, 2008, 07:42:20 PM
HBO is not safe late at night.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on July 24, 2008, 09:42:19 PM
HBO is not safe late at night.
It's safe. It's very safe.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on July 25, 2008, 05:31:22 AM
For any of you that watch Eureka on Sci-Fi new episodes start the 29th.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 25, 2008, 07:03:17 AM
I've finished watching all the Californication episodes on On Demand now and really enjoyed all of them.  It's very funny!

Oh, and why is HBO not safe at night?  The only reason that I don't ditch it is because of Flight of the Conchords and they have some really good documentaries.  Their new series, True Blood, maybe looks kind of sort of interesting, too, although I'm not usually big on vampire crap. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on July 25, 2008, 07:24:42 AM
They have this Cathouse show that will foil even your best laid plans for that half hour.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on July 25, 2008, 07:28:02 AM
Air Force Annie FTW!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 25, 2008, 07:42:03 AM
She scares the shit out of me.

I liked Isabella, at least until she started doing hard core DP porn. She looks pretty beat up now.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ookii on July 25, 2008, 07:53:38 AM
She scares the shit out of me.

I liked Isabella, at least until she started doing hard core DP porn. She looks pretty beat up now.

She is by far the hottest one there.  You should post links!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on July 25, 2008, 08:58:57 AM
I am at work, but a GIS for "isabella soprano" should turn up some extremely NSFW additions for your collection. For academic study, of course.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: fuser on July 25, 2008, 09:28:16 AM
The guy playong Maj. Eckoff, the guy just below Godfather, was on The Wire so I looked him up on IMDB.  Turns out he is a Marine and actually commanded the 4th Light Armored Recon in Iraq in 2003.

Another major one from the Wire is the hummvee "rip fuel'd" driver (Ziggy from port themed season two).

Amazingly good series so far, glad from all accounts the book is treated well by David Simon (Come on HBO produce Treme (http://blog.nola.com/davewalker/2008/07/more_on_david_simons_treme.html#ThewireHBO))

(edit for Treme link)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 27, 2008, 10:49:22 PM
Been watching it. Pretty cool show, I agree. As for the stuff I mentioned about chest beating, there was a cool scene in the last ep that I watched, where some marine was talking about his mom playing some patriotic country song, and he was like fuck that shit. He was a marine, and had better things to do. Good stuff.

The Godfather is fucking cool.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on July 27, 2008, 11:51:40 PM
Mad Men season 2 started tonight. 

Season 1 was awfully good.  The guy that played Don Draper did a hell of a job and got the Golden Globe for it too. 

I recommend checking this show out.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on July 28, 2008, 01:51:49 AM
For something more low brow.

The latest Top Gear episode was hilarious.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on July 28, 2008, 06:15:41 AM
Mad Men season 2 started tonight. 

Season 1 was awfully good.  The guy that played Don Draper did a hell of a job and got the Golden Globe for it too. 

I recommend checking this show out.

I watched a couple of those because they were on On Demand and then I completely forgot about it.  They actually were pretty good, in a kind of soap opera way.  Well acted, too.  I'll have to check to see if it's still around, sometimes the old ones disappear when the new ones start.  Also, we're switching to FIOS tomorrow - just to see if there's any difference.  It only saves us like $20, but we get that 20 up/ 20 down internet thingy and the first 3 months everything is totally almost free.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nebu on July 28, 2008, 06:30:33 AM
Mad Men season 2 started tonight. 

Season 1 was awfully good.  The guy that played Don Draper did a hell of a job and got the Golden Globe for it too. 

I recommend checking this show out.

I'm not much of a television person, but I must agree.  I watched a marathon of season 1 and was quite drawn in.  The show is well made and has a great period feel to it.  The start of the second season was ok, but it hasn't completely drawn me in. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on July 28, 2008, 07:29:24 AM
For something more low brow.

The latest Top Gear episode was hilarious.

Uh, not sure if cars are too low brow. We're just talking about stripper and war shows, y'know?  :wink:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on July 28, 2008, 03:00:43 PM
The start of the second season was ok, but it hasn't completely drawn me in. 

It was really odd and felt out of place.  I think this is mostly due to it being set 14 months later and us not knowing about how all of the conflicts were resolved. Looks like someone's going to be slipping up again soon though.  :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on July 29, 2008, 12:06:22 PM
I watched a couple of those because they were on On Demand and then I completely forgot about it.  They actually were pretty good, in a kind of soap opera way.  Well acted, too.  I'll have to check to see if it's still around, sometimes the old ones disappear when the new ones start.  Also, we're switching to FIOS tomorrow - just to see if there's any difference.  It only saves us like $20, but we get that 20 up/ 20 down internet thingy and the first 3 months everything is totally almost free.

We just expanded the line up in NY to include a gazillion HD channels.  Also, the internet connection is rock solid!

And yet I still cannot get it in my neighborhood.  :(


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on July 29, 2008, 05:57:11 PM
Season premier of Eureka was tonight on Sci-fi, and really, really dissapointing.

The whole thing just didn't make any fucking sense, it's a top-secret city that noone knows about, why would the DOD bring in the gal who coined the term "downsizing" to examine a bunch of research, of course it's inefficient, it's fucking research!

Then the whole "this city has to pull it's own weight" quip, when last season they're explaining to us that technology Eureka developed 50 years ago is just now getting released, for fucks sake they have a fusion reactor in the coffee shop.

Just completely dissapointing, the episodic storyline on the rogue drone was good as they always are, but where they're going with the season long ark is just  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nerf on August 01, 2008, 08:04:12 PM
New Venture Brothers this weekend, up now on Adultswim.com

Easily one of the best yet, definately the best of the season.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 04, 2008, 05:16:18 AM
Been watching Holmes on Homes. I like when tv actually makes people's lives better.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Reg on August 04, 2008, 05:18:37 AM
I just heard that Flash Gordon got cancelled and now I'm sad. I can only assume it was somehow the fault of the Welsh.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on August 04, 2008, 05:49:49 AM
Been watching Holmes on Homes. I like when tv actually makes people's lives better.

Great show, it's good to hear that you guys get it below the border. For those that haven't seen it, its basically Extreme Home Makeover, only without twenty minutes of staged crying, and with a real contractor instead of an overly flamboyant douchebag for a host.

Mike Holmes/Ty Pennington cage mach. That, I'd pay to see.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 04, 2008, 06:27:20 AM
Been watching Holmes on Homes. I like when tv actually makes people's lives better.

In change of pace, I've been watching House in my house.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 04, 2008, 08:21:27 AM
I got tricked into watching Twin Peaks with a friend.





 :-o


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on August 04, 2008, 08:58:56 AM
I got tricked into watching Twin Peaks with a friend.





 :-o

It only work if you were on a hill.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 04, 2008, 11:57:15 AM
I got tricked into watching Twin Peaks with a friend.





 :-o

It only work if you were on a hill.

what? lol.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Triforcer on August 04, 2008, 11:59:17 AM
I was watching Lost, but then I woke up. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on August 11, 2008, 07:23:13 AM
Another good Venture ep. last night.  We finally got a solid possibility of who/what happened to Jonas Venture, and Rusty actually surprised me a bit. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 11, 2008, 07:45:04 AM
It was so-so on the funny; strong on the story.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on August 11, 2008, 10:35:32 AM
I enjoyed the Venture version of the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.

"It's not as if we are trying to be a guild... of calamitous intent!"

Quote
...and Rusty actually surprised me a bit.
I actually thought that bit was somewhat overdue.  Everyone else so far in season 3 has shown a little more depth in their character, except Rusty.  I'm glad to see that maybe there's more to him than 'self-interested douchebag.'


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: tazelbain on August 11, 2008, 10:53:29 AM
I want to hear more about the villainy of Nikola Tesla.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mazakiel on August 11, 2008, 11:05:16 AM
At the risk of appearing silly for analyzing Venture plot, the whole thing with Dr. Killinger was probably something of a wakeup call for him about where he really was.  But this season has been good overall in showing depth to all the characters, for both good and ill. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 11, 2008, 06:21:19 PM
I want to hear more about the villainy of Nikola Tesla.

And of course, David Bowie played Nikola Tesla in The Prestige.

I loved the Victorian guild henchmen,  with the stovepipe hats.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 11, 2008, 09:08:56 PM
Finally finished both seasons of Life on Mars. Goddamnit, I love DCI Hunt. The ending was a bit Jacob's Laddery in a positive way, but I liked it well enough. I could have watched Glenister and Simms play off of each other for 5 or 6 seasons.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on August 11, 2008, 09:31:58 PM
I don't much like game shows but I love the Sayonara Boys.

Why can't they just show the Sayonara Boys running off with people and ditch the game show bit?  That would be awesome.  (http://smileys.on-my-web.com/repository/Laughing/lol-069.gif)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evil Elvis on August 15, 2008, 03:15:09 PM
Holy shit.  Best. Venture. Bros. Ever.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on August 18, 2008, 11:15:25 AM
I am very sad that there is only one more Generation Kill. I have enjoyed the hell out of it. Doesn't really have the emotional impact of Band of Brothers, but is definitely that type of quality.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 18, 2008, 11:22:39 AM
They are doing an amazing job of puting the book on the screen. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 18, 2008, 11:47:26 AM
I just really loved the feel of what it's like for a unit in a combat zone. I don't think I'll ever be there but I know enough people who have (and done a small amount of the training) to really appreciate a feeling of accuracy. The whole subplot with the officers actually probably engages me emotionally more than the random shooting of civilians (which it shouldn't, I just find myself thinking that one's an inevitable consequence of war while the other's seriously unfair).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jeff Kelly on August 20, 2008, 06:17:58 AM
I watched the Comedy Central Roast of Bob Saget and I seriously don't get it.

It was basically a one hour recycling of "Bob Saget is unfunny" and "Bob Saget is gay" jokes done by second rate 'comedians' that had to use teleprompters to remember their gags.

God that was boring


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 20, 2008, 09:22:21 AM
Now currently watching Jeremiah (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0290966/).


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: bhodi on August 20, 2008, 09:29:55 AM
Never heard of it. Is it good? I do like JMS...


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 20, 2008, 09:42:58 AM
I watched the Comedy Central Roast of Bob Saget and I seriously don't get it.

It was basically a one hour recycling of "Bob Saget is unfunny" and "Bob Saget is gay" jokes done by second rate 'comedians' that had to use teleprompters to remember their gags.

God that was boring

It was not good. 

I appreciate what Norm Macdonald's bit was (he was basically irl trolling the roast),  but it was not entertaining.

Cloris Leechman was great,  and almost redeemed the huge waste of time it was.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 20, 2008, 09:46:36 AM
Never heard of it. Is it good? I do like JMS...

So far, yes, im not out of season 1 yet however. Contains more social and civil commentary from the man that brought you bab5, some rather silly, some rather brilliant.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 20, 2008, 09:57:47 AM
I watched the Comedy Central Roast of Bob Saget and I seriously don't get it.

It was basically a one hour recycling of "Bob Saget is unfunny" and "Bob Saget is gay" jokes done by second rate 'comedians' that had to use teleprompters to remember their gags.

God that was boring

It was not good. 

I appreciate what Norm Macdonald's bit was (he was basically irl trolling the roast),  but it was not entertaining.

Cloris Leechman was great,  and almost redeemed the huge waste of time it was.

Yeah Norm's bit was great.  The lack of laughs underscores just how seriously everyone there takes themselves and how if it's not about fucking, weed or drinking it's not a 'joke' in the US these days.  Cloris was also really fucking funny but I got the feeling more people were lauging out of respect than actually thinking she was funny. Comedy is dead.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on August 23, 2008, 08:20:31 AM
(Spoilers about the first season of BattleStar Galactica)



I've been watching the miniseries plus the entire first season of Battlestar Galactica during this past week.

I ABSOLUTELY loved it (the "Wing Commander" feel is awesome)...until the two last episodes. Geeze, it was so enthralling...

...but wasn't it a little TOO CONVENIENT to find Kobol so suddenly? The plot lines, so nicely intertwined until that point, suddenly sped-up. Was the Network unsure about a possible second season or something?

I found everything a little dull and messy (Sharon-Galactica coming to terms with her being a Cylon, the convenient spot where the Kobol expedition landed, right beside the Opera Threatre). The timing of the last episode is cool, how all the events are portrayed together, but again I stopped watching with a bittersweet feeling; a couple of more in-depth episodes would have explained everything better, IMO.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rishathra on August 23, 2008, 03:50:57 PM
This is unfortunately a theme that will run throughout the series.  Several episodes of shuffling feet followed by a whole bunch of shit crammed together in one episode, as if the writers forgot about the plot they were supposed to be advancing and then remembered all of a sudden.

Ultimately, still very much worth watching, though, IMO.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 23, 2008, 03:55:08 PM
This is unfortunately a theme that will run throughout the series.  Several episodes of shuffling feet followed by a whole bunch of shit crammed together in one episode, as if the writers forgot about the plot they were supposed to be advancing and then remembered all of a sudden.

Ultimately, still very much worth watching, though, IMO.

This is made worse by the fact that some episodes bust through the barriers of Greatest TV Episodes Ever (The first episode "33" or whatever;  New Caprica episodes).

It's really tough to go from that back to what would otherwise be a mediocre-to-good soap opera/drama episode or backstory episode.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 24, 2008, 09:38:31 PM
"Fucking robot got grease all over my dress"

I'm going to miss Venture Bros.  Seriously, it better not be another 3 year layoff.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on August 24, 2008, 10:11:30 PM
I read that they had already started working on the next season a few months ago, so we might see it as early as next year.

Also: WHY DID YOU BUCKLE THE SEAT BELT!?!  :heartbreak:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 25, 2008, 04:33:39 AM
I read that they had already started working on the next season a few months ago, so we might see it as early as next year.

Also: WHY DID YOU BUCKLE THE SEAT BELT!?!  :heartbreak:

WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on August 25, 2008, 06:20:07 AM
Just bought the first three seasons of the Venture Brothers on iTunes based on the comments here.

Watched the first twelve episodes on a flight... I have to say, it is different.  Some very funny parts, but a lot of  :uhrr: and  :ye_gods: parts as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 25, 2008, 07:34:59 AM
"Fucking robot got grease all over my dress"

I'm going to miss Venture Bros.  Seriously, it better not be another 3 year layoff.

I think the original layoff after the first season was because Cartoon Network wasn't sure they wanted to renew it or not. They dicked around for about a year on whether or not to renew, so when they finally did, it took them a while to make new episodes. But they renewed for season 2 and 3 at the same time, which is why the two seasons came so close together.

How the hell they couldn't make up their minds to renew or not I'll never figure out. That show is just a gem.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 25, 2008, 09:40:30 AM
"Fucking robot got grease all over my dress"

I'm going to miss Venture Bros.  Seriously, it better not be another 3 year layoff.

I think the original layoff after the first season was because Cartoon Network wasn't sure they wanted to renew it or not. They dicked around for about a year on whether or not to renew, so when they finally did, it took them a while to make new episodes. But they renewed for season 2 and 3 at the same time, which is why the two seasons came so close together.

How the hell they couldn't make up their minds to renew or not I'll never figure out. That show is just a gem.

There was 2 years between the Season 2 debut and Season 3 debut.


From what I've read,  not much has been done with Season 4 and both Doc Hammer and Jackson Public claim to be "exhausted."  They're looking at taking a fairly big break before starting on Season 4,  and the earliest we'll see that is September next year. 

Of course,  if Cartoon Network decides to plug Venture in for a Summer start as per usual we'll be looking at a two year hiatus.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Merusk on August 25, 2008, 09:54:38 AM
I'd rather have a 2-year hiatus that keeps the quality up, than turn into Family Guy for the adventure-cartoon crowd.  :grin:

Speaking of adventure cartoons.. there isn't a fucking one on tv these days.  Not one.  No, TMNT doens't count and you'll see why if you watch it sometime. (My god its awful.) My kids aren't getting enough animated violence. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 25, 2008, 11:07:49 AM
Adventure cartoons?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNVYWJOEy9A


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on August 25, 2008, 11:32:19 AM
"Fucking robot got grease all over my dress"

I'm going to miss Venture Bros.  Seriously, it better not be another 3 year layoff.

I think the original layoff after the first season was because Cartoon Network wasn't sure they wanted to renew it or not. They dicked around for about a year on whether or not to renew, so when they finally did, it took them a while to make new episodes. But they renewed for season 2 and 3 at the same time, which is why the two seasons came so close together.

How the hell they couldn't make up their minds to renew or not I'll never figure out. That show is just a gem.

The problem is the numbers.  Endless repeats of Family Guy seem to do better than everything else on Adult Swim,

Venture Brothers are one of the two things on the channel worth watching, the other being Shin Chan.

Neither one seems to hit the top 3 in their "Numbers Game" ratings updates very often.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on August 25, 2008, 11:38:09 AM
Speaking of TMNT, they're airing the most recent TMNT movie on hbo/sho/evs. I got sucked in by the animation, it was phenomenal. Movie was lame, but I watched the whole thing because the animation was just that good.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on August 25, 2008, 12:46:55 PM
Speaking of TMNT, they're airing the most recent TMNT movie on hbo/sho/evs. I got sucked in by the animation, it was phenomenal. Movie was lame, but I watched the whole thing because the animation was just that good.

I kind of liked it, but I wish they would have gone full tilt TMNT instead of the more kidified version.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on August 25, 2008, 02:57:08 PM
I wanted to kiss Captain Patterson full on the lips last night for his actions during the football game. It is so fucking depressing that those asshats are actually real people with real responsibilities in the military.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 25, 2008, 04:18:30 PM
It was fucking good finale. I didn't quite the football game though, was it just soldiers who were all really stressed out and upset finding some outlet for their emotions? Definitely the impression I got with Ray and Rudi but have I just forgotten something else that went on to explain the Capt.? Also Godfather's explanation at the end for not shitcanning Capt. America put things in perspective somewhat for why the obvious moves don't always get made. The whole thing was a brilliant piece of television.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 25, 2008, 05:00:10 PM
Patterson knows that Encino Man is a total moron and got tired of his BS regarding how great he is and how lousy Alpha Company was. In the book it was actually a race where he saw Encino Man body check some enlisted guys during a race because he knew he was going to lose.  Patterson didn't punch him but he did tackle him and put him in a headlock.

The whole series was great and I highly recommend the book. I was so happy they included the "I'm running serpentine!" scene as that is one of my favorites from the book.

BTW, Captain America was promoted to a prestigious position after the period shown in the show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on August 25, 2008, 05:04:25 PM
I missed something.

What show is this?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on August 25, 2008, 05:28:03 PM
Generation Kill.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: MrHat on August 25, 2008, 05:41:06 PM
Cool.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: NowhereMan on August 25, 2008, 05:49:41 PM
BTW, Captain America was promoted to a prestigious position after the period shown in the show.

Well his uncle is a full bird colonel :oh_i_see:

Though that makes me wonder, I presume most of the people this is about have read the book and now get to see their lives put up on the small screen. I wonder what this is going to be like if you're someone like Capt. America, especially if he's still in the Marines.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: WayAbvPar on August 26, 2008, 08:00:57 AM
Quote
The whole series was great and I highly recommend the book. I was so happy they included the "I'm running serpentine!" scene as that is one of my favorites from the book.

I ordered it yesterday.

Every time anyone runs away from gunfire onscreen I always say "Serpentine!". I can't believe he actually quoted "The In-Laws" though. That was awesome.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Lucas on August 27, 2008, 02:46:48 PM
By the way, I'm also currently watching the fourth season of Alias. It's friggin' amazing!!!!

I  :heart: everyone in that series, bad guys, good guys, whatever. Total kneeling fanboi.

That is all.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on August 27, 2008, 07:00:43 PM
So was Buffy really that big hit of a show?

I've been watching the Buffy seasons... for the first time, and not very impressed.

The first couple seasons were ok, then it just gets harder and harder to watch.  I've been struggling to get through season 6. 

Is Angel a better series?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Cheddar on August 27, 2008, 07:07:59 PM
So was Buffy really that big hit of a show?

I've been watching the Buffy seasons... for the first time, and not very impressed.

The first couple seasons were ok, then it just gets harder and harder to watch.  I've been struggling to get through season 6. 

Is Angel a better series?

Yes.  Sometimes it delves into childish realms, but it is a LOT more dark and gritty.  I wouldn't put it up there with Firefly, but its worth the 20 bucks I spent on Amazon to get all 5 seasons.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on August 27, 2008, 07:20:42 PM
"Fucking robot got grease all over my dress"

I'm going to miss Venture Bros.  Seriously, it better not be another 3 year layoff.

I think the original layoff after the first season was because Cartoon Network wasn't sure they wanted to renew it or not. They dicked around for about a year on whether or not to renew, so when they finally did, it took them a while to make new episodes. But they renewed for season 2 and 3 at the same time, which is why the two seasons came so close together.

How the hell they couldn't make up their minds to renew or not I'll never figure out. That show is just a gem.

The problem is the numbers.  Endless repeats of Family Guy seem to do better than everything else on Adult Swim,

Venture Brothers are one of the two things on the channel worth watching, the other being Shin Chan.

Neither one seems to hit the top 3 in their "Numbers Game" ratings updates very often.

The premiere episode for the latest season of Venture did pretty big numbers.  Also, on adultswim.com generally Venture is hitting 500,000+ views.

Metalocalypse is a pretty solid show as well.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on August 27, 2008, 07:52:29 PM
Venture Brothers is pretty much the only show I watch off Cartoon Network nowadays.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on August 28, 2008, 12:27:41 AM
So was Buffy really that big hit of a show?
It was for the WB which isn't saying a whole lot when you compare it to all the all the network broadcast shows at the time. It did have a very loyal viewing audience and the show generated a lot of "buzz" (e.g. for "Hush" and "Once More With Feeling") even though not that many people watched it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 28, 2008, 03:36:18 AM
Generation Kill is amazing.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 28, 2008, 07:46:18 AM
So BBC America started their new (for America) sci-fi show Primeval.

Not terrible. Looks like it may have an interesting subplot to string together the monster of the week plots. I found it kind of hard to understand the thick Scots accent of the main character, and I usually don't have a problem with that. But the show's been decent enough to muddle through. For you UK folks who might have seen it, does it build to something decent?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on August 28, 2008, 04:03:06 PM
So BBC America started their new (for America) sci-fi show Primeval.

Not terrible. Looks like it may have an interesting subplot to string together the monster of the week plots. I found it kind of hard to understand the thick Scots accent of the main character, and I usually don't have a problem with that. But the show's been decent enough to muddle through. For you UK folks who might have seen it, does it build to something decent?

STOP WATCHING PRIMEVAL NOW!  It is awful shit.

 I wish I could have those hours back.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on August 29, 2008, 01:48:21 AM
Thick scots accent.  lol.

You have got to get me on the phone.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on August 29, 2008, 03:11:28 AM
Thick scots accent.  lol.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXGu68R2NKA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXGu68R2NKA)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on August 29, 2008, 03:12:25 AM
I liked primeval. It was total trash, but I liked it. Both seasons.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on August 29, 2008, 11:49:40 AM
I enjoyed the first 2 episodes and all.  Its no Battlestar Galactica, but its fun and entertaining enough.

Plus, hottie dancing around in her underwear because she "needs to keep her apartment warm for the little dinosaur she is keeping as a pet".

We can't have cold dinosaurs now can we?  It wouldn't be civilized!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on August 29, 2008, 12:07:07 PM
Well, maybe we'll all eventually find a game we'll want to play together and Ironwood can shout at us on TS  We'll make him guild leader for a laugh.  I'll lol at all the "what?"  "what did he say?"  complaints.  Shit, I get it on TS and I don't have any sort of accent at all! 

Ironwood will make you all cry. 


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on August 30, 2008, 01:28:10 PM
Thick scots accent.  lol.

You have got to get me on the phone.



It's gotten better since the pilot. Maybe it was just bad sound mixing, but it he was tough to understand in the pilot. That video though? Are those even words?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on August 31, 2008, 02:37:02 PM
It's gotten better since the pilot. Maybe it was just bad sound mixing, but it he was tough to understand in the pilot. That video though? Are those even words?

I understand every word. Southern US accents on the other hand, can be incomprehensible. Reminds me of when my mother, a Scottish teacher who speaks fluent French and emigrated to Australia, was told she couldn't possibly be allowed to teach French "because you have an accent" ... by Australians.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 02, 2008, 07:30:38 AM
Our high school had an Italian French teacher. He was seriously old world. They used to do a class trip to France. I used to imagine all these French people wondering who these assholes were, Americans speaking French with a heavy Italian accent.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 03, 2008, 10:55:54 AM
OH HAY.

Entourage (S5), 09/07
Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles (S2), 09/8
Prison Break (S4), 09/08
Fringe (New), 09/09

It begins!



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 03, 2008, 12:01:07 PM
Its back?


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 03, 2008, 12:01:45 PM
You know it.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Rasix on September 03, 2008, 12:07:45 PM
Huh, looks like I may be missing Entourage this year.  No big loss.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 03, 2008, 01:40:29 PM
Its back?

You knew it'd be back.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Tale on September 03, 2008, 02:00:09 PM
Prison Break (S4), 09/08

Jumped the shark in series 3 when a major character turned into a severed head in a box (it even had someone else's face on freeze frame, because the actor was fired from the show). But having watched three seasons of painfully drawn-out cliffhangers, I'm going to lose an hour a week again.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 03, 2008, 02:46:44 PM
I don't like Prison Break. Not even halfway through the first season I bugged out. I figured someone else here cared.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 03, 2008, 02:48:08 PM

No honestly, i thought it was done for. I am very excited and will spread the news to my si-fi night buddy's.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Trippy on September 03, 2008, 02:53:27 PM
They've been pimping it (and the rest of their Fall lineup) all Summer on FOX.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Oban on September 03, 2008, 03:30:35 PM
Mad Men.

Holy fuck, this is what all TV should be like.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 03, 2008, 04:52:08 PM
Prison Break (S4), 09/08

Jumped the shark in series 3 when a major character turned into a severed head in a box (it even had someone else's face on freeze frame, because the actor was fired from the show). But having watched three seasons of painfully drawn-out cliffhangers, I'm going to lose an hour a week again.


I love me some Prison Break, i don't know why.  This season started out pretty good and there's a reason for a different head in the box.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 03, 2008, 07:44:52 PM
The Shield was kick-ass last night.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 03, 2008, 08:11:16 PM
OH HAY.

Entourage (S5), 09/07
Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles (S2), 09/8
Prison Break (S4), 09/08
Fringe (New), 09/09

It begins!



Looking forward to True Blood here (the 8th?). There's kind of a lack of supernatural shows atm...and now an HBO one? Sign me up!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 03, 2008, 08:13:19 PM
So was Buffy really that big hit of a show?

I've been watching the Buffy seasons... for the first time, and not very impressed.

The first couple seasons were ok, then it just gets harder and harder to watch.  I've been struggling to get through season 6. 

Is Angel a better series?

Angel's definitely better..and funnier. I stuck with Buffy pretty much for Spike, I guess. He ends up making Angel an even better series later on too.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 03, 2008, 08:18:55 PM
Yeah I just got through the first Season of Angel and I definitely like it better then Buffy so far.

Ya Spike is a great character, I like James Marsters. 

I got stalled on season 6 of Buffy.. I just can't keep going.  lol.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Bunk on September 03, 2008, 08:25:00 PM

No honestly, i thought it was done for. I am very excited and will spread the news to my si-fi night buddy's.

Damnit, know one aknowledges my witty jokes.

That being said, I'm really glad its coming back to, even with 90210 boy.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ironwood on September 04, 2008, 06:20:24 AM
Thick scots accent.  lol.

You have got to get me on the phone.



It's gotten better since the pilot. Maybe it was just bad sound mixing, but it he was tough to understand in the pilot. That video though? Are those even words?

The Scottish Dolmio chaps are pretty much perfect Glaswegian.  Yes, I can sound like that.  Yes, It makes WoW Raiding hard.

Except for 'Shut it the fucking lot of yeez'.  I use that a lot.



Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Signe on September 04, 2008, 07:27:53 AM
Buffy was just okay in the beginning.  Spike started turning into a big pussy eventually.  Angel was maybe a bit better but they both eventually turned into a load of tired old shitey shite.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Jain Zar on September 04, 2008, 03:44:44 PM
Buffy was just okay in the beginning.  Spike started turning into a big pussy eventually.  Angel was maybe a bit better but they both eventually turned into a load of tired old shitey shite.

I never thought either show was much good to begin with.  Too much "witty" banter and oh so smarmy characters shitting up what could have been a very cool pair of scary shows.

But Whedon loves his witty dialogue. 

It also shit up Alien Resurrection.

Its why whenever I hear about how great Firefly was supposed to be I tend to roll my eyes.  Nothing else the guy has done has been worth a shit, how would this be any difference?

If the success of it and the movie are anything to go by, the answer is "ITS NOT".


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: stray on September 04, 2008, 04:53:57 PM
Uh, witty is pretty much a given. Not sure why you say it's too much or bother expecting something else, when that's exactly what his schtick is all about. I mean, shit, it's called Buffy the Vampire Slayer for crissakes.  :-)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Prospero on September 04, 2008, 05:00:25 PM
I'll confess to being a sucker for the witty banter. It's one of things that makes the last episode pretty cool. After a couple grim seasons with a whole lotta angst, there is a brief return to their old high school selves.

Of course I also like Psych, so clearly I am pro-banter.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Johny Cee on September 04, 2008, 05:44:41 PM
Uh, witty is pretty much a given. Not sure why you say it's too much or bother expecting something else, when that's exactly what his schtick is all about. I mean, shit, it's called Buffy the Vampire Slayer for crissakes.  :-)

He writes all his characters the same.  Every one.  They all deliver lines and jokes in the same snarky tone, and use the same speech patterns.  And he needs to give the whole "dark reluctant hero" schtick a fucking rest.  And he needed to not rip off Farscape so badly when he came up with Firefly.

Except for Adam Baldwin as Jayne.  He's  :drill:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Ingmar on September 04, 2008, 05:46:12 PM
He's like Tarentino that way (all the dialogue is the same) but I'll grant, the type of dialogue he settled on isn't nearly as annoying.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 05, 2008, 09:02:16 AM
They've been pimping it (and the rest of their Fall lineup) all Summer on FOX.


I don't watch TV  :grin:

Uh, being fans of both. Farscape and firefly, have little in common.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: schild on September 05, 2008, 09:03:57 AM

No one acknowledged it because my "You know it" was supposed to be the same joke. Let's be friends in our misery. Failures of humor unite. Untie!


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Abagadro on September 07, 2008, 04:11:43 PM
Be sure to watch Hole in the Wall on Fox tonight. A show where people try to jump through foam walls via people-shaped holes.

No I'm not joking.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 07, 2008, 04:15:06 PM
Be sure to watch Hole in the Wall on Fox tonight. A show where people try to jump through foam walls via people-shaped holes.

No I'm not joking.  :uhrr:

Yet another thing stolen from the Japanese.  Human Tetris (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bekQU9l8hk&feature=rec-fresh)


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: HaemishM on September 08, 2008, 08:17:40 AM
They should have left it in fucking Japan. It's worth about one YouTube viewing and that's it. Or at least named it something other than Fucking Hole in the Wall.

Suggested title: Glory Hole


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 08, 2008, 02:17:19 PM
Haha.. well if you notice on that clip.. that shit's on it's 20th Anniversary.  I mean they seriously found a way to make that crap last 20 years? 

Mind you.. the first couple of vids I watched it was hillarious.  More for the reactions of the players then anything else.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Grand Design on September 08, 2008, 03:50:08 PM
Mad Men.

Holy fuck, this is what all TV should be like.

An extremely well done show that suffers from not being picked up by HBO, who passed.  Instead, its on AMC.  Frankly, I'm glad HBO passed because they probably would have pushed Weiner to make it 'sexier' and its perfect the way it is now.

How can a show about 60's advertising executives be interesting?  Watch a couple of episodes - I can't really put it into words.  One episode in particular (Red in the Face?) was just superb. 

Unfortunately, I didn't Netflix it until season two had begun, so I'm stuck in limbo until its released on DVD.





Tonight.  Terminator.  Be there.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Nevermore on September 08, 2008, 08:52:11 PM
Mad Men.

Holy fuck, this is what all TV should be like.

An extremely well done show that suffers from not being picked up by HBO, who passed.  Instead, its on AMC.  Frankly, I'm glad HBO passed because they probably would have pushed Weiner to make it 'sexier' and its perfect the way it is now.

How can a show about 60's advertising executives be interesting?  Watch a couple of episodes - I can't really put it into words.  One episode in particular (Red in the Face?) was just superb. 

Unfortunately, I didn't Netflix it until season two had begun, so I'm stuck in limbo until its released on DVD.

It's interesting because of all the subtleties going on.  I for one am very glad it wasn't picked up by HBO because I wouldn't be able to watch it if it had been.

Sort of like how I can't watch True Blood.  That makes me a  :sad_panda:


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Evildrider on September 08, 2008, 09:50:15 PM
They should have left it in fucking Japan. It's worth about one YouTube viewing and that's it. Or at least named it something other than Fucking Hole in the Wall.

Suggested title: Glory Hole


Holy crap.. the prize is up to $125k for that show.


Title: Re: Television thread
Post by: Sky on September 09, 2008, 06:20:23 AM
So. Time Warner moved UniHD. While it's nice to have a shitload more HD channels (kinda, when did the learning channel turn into the LCD channel), on Saturday I noticed BSG running. Put it on and they're talking about Starbuck's return. Motherfucker, looks like I got fucked on the new season in HD. Probably get fucked for Atlantis, too. Bleh.