Title: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 07, 2005, 07:01:43 AM well, more like typical "burned out employee who quit" ranting, but there is a pr0n angle to this one (former EQ2 CSR who quit SoE to do porn) so the story may have some legs.
Though my first thought after reading this was that I wanted to see Koster's 65-page manual on how to be a good CSR, which means I've been hanging out here far too long. Quote Work gossip RETURNETH (and things) I haven't bothered thinking or writing about SOE since I quit a few months ago but apparently a lot of other people have. In fact, it seems that the "unmasking of Faarwolf" raised quite a few questions about work vs. outside life and has (or had) a lot of people talking about it. Like I said, I've not checked up on any of these sites since I quit so all this is news to me, while it might be old for everyone else out there. A few minutes ago someone linked me this article on Aggro Me, an EQII/MMO-related blog that I used to read fairly religiously (in fact, I read it as a part of my job at SOE). Following that, I found a similar article on Broken Toys and several other mentions on various blogs, all of which rather (stupidly in retrospect because really, wtf did I expect?) surprised me. Not in a BAD way, none of these mentions seem particularly negative really, but just in that it was really worth mention at all. Anyway, late as this is I'd like to clarify a few things regarding my leaving SOE "to do porn". First off, I didn't get fired nor was I asked to leave. I put in my notice a full 2 months before I left in the interest of giving the EQII team ample time to find and train my replacement...which they didn't do anyway since they lagged until after I left. Secondly, I did my damndest to keep my private and professional lives seperate and I think I did a very good job. People on the EQII forums often wondered why I refused to have my picture taken at events and why I wouldn't post one of myself like a lot of other Dev team members did. I even made it into a bit of a game, saying that it was because I looked like a Troll (which had the effect of everyone assuming I was hot). A few people figured it out but they kept quiet and didn't make a scene, which I very much appreciated. By the same token, a lot of people on the EQII Dev Team knew about my hobbies outside of work, including upper management, and nobody cared. A few of them even signed up! It was never discussed but the general idea seemed to be that as long as it didn't affect my work, nobody really cared. I never discussed where I worked in my LJ or on my site and I never discussed my hobbies while at work. In short, it was never an issue. As my site took off I realized that this wasn't going to be an indefinite situation. I chose pr0n over EQII Dev because 1. It pays better; 2. I don't have to deal with being micromanaged (or managed at all); 3. After the management changed, I hated my job anyway and 4. EQII was going nowhere (and I HATED San Diego to boot). I only accepted the job at SOE because I loved my work in the first place; I took a serious pay cut from working in IT to work there as a fucking forum moderator. I loved it though...I MISS the damn forums sometimes...the haiku, oh my! But the work environment just became the utter suck so /endjob. Wanna know what turned me off about SOE? Well, first off I watched a girl with NO experience at all get promoted over me because she waggled her tits at her boss. I'm not an office flirt whatsoever and tend to keep to myself, so I totally lost on that front because I wasn't willing to go the hoebag omg-let-me-sit-on-ur-lap route. I was more like "gtf out of my cube and let me work in peace, you fag" so, no promotions for me. Strike one. Strike two was the fact that executive staff at SOE just kept making idiotic decisions and leaving Community Relations to clean up the mess. They outright lied to the customer base on several occasions and made me, who would have preferred to say "yeah we lied, our bad", make up excuses and bullshit that I knew the customer base wouldn't buy. I HATED that. Strike three was the management change. I do not refer to the promotion of Gallenite - that dude was seriously one of my favorite people at the entire company and a total badass to work with - or really to Blackguard either because he busted his ass and really loved the game. Largely it was the "we want more but will give you less to do it with" atmosphere, the 65-fucking-page-long manual on how to be a good Rep written by Raph Koster, having meetings in order to schedule meetings (wtf??) and Brenlo constantly micromanaging everything once he got promoted. Prior to that, I liked him just fine and as a person I still do; I just would never want to work under him again because he wants in on everything and I hate that. All this, coupled with the fact that the job was completely dead-end unless I wanted to flash some titty or work 18 hour days + in unpaid overtime in order to kiss someone's ass hard enough that they would move me onto a different team pretty much killed the magic for me. I still have a good view of the company but yeah...I was just done with it. 2 years with no movement at all? Fuck that. If I have to jiggle my tits in order to get somewhere then I'll do that on my own time where I'll get paid more to do it. Pure logic, that. Once I quit I figured there was no reason to keep it a secret anymore so I talked about it publicly. Keep in mind that I didn't do that until after I quit SOE though...I never went there while I was an employee; I've more respect than that. Also, in regards to selling my EQII Dev stuff on eBay...well, I don't play EQ2 anymore and I got rid of a lot of things I didn't need when I moved, and that was among them. I saved some stuff - my signed poster, a collector's edition box, etc., but I sold the big stuff to help pay for my relocation. I'm not what you'd call a sentimental person at all so dragging that stuff around wasn't doing me any good, and anyway the sword was just a Kit Rae stamped with the EQII logo...it's not even really custom made. In summary, I think that people should be allowed to do whatever they want to outside of work so long as it doesn't affect their job performance or overall effectiveness, and any vague two-bit arguments about how it's just "not right" or somehow unethical and the people who make those arguments can just take a hike off the highest cliff they can find. My employer doesn't buy the rights to my life when they start cutting me paychecks, dig? 'Nuff said. From http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/143511.html via Fires of Heaven. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 07:15:35 AM If she's gonna act like she has balls, she needs to step up the ante and name people. If she doesn't do that it's just more drama queening.
This falls under the "the Internet is serious business" saying. But for fun I'll entertain the notion that these upcoming sentences are true since the rest is just more of the gaming industry norm of bitching and moaning after the employer stops cutting your check. Quote Well, first off I watched a girl with NO experience at all get promoted over me because she waggled her tits at her boss. 1. Girls who wag their tits in an office get promotions. It's called the real world. And I agree, it's not fair. Get a helmet. Me? I go out of my way not to compete with tits. I'd lose. Even if you don't have them, moobs always lose. If there was a real case here you'd own part of Sony. Quote Strike two was the fact that executive staff at SOE just kept making idiotic decisions and leaving Community Relations to clean up the mess. 2. Community Relations people clean up messes. THAT'S THE JOB. The rest is the easy part. Perhaps your lack of wanting to clean up messes and dissension is why you didn't get the raises. Maybe the other girl was just willing to do it and she had nice tits. There's something to be said about doing what you're paid to do. Too much moral value? You shouldn't have sat around this long letting the anger brew. Which leads us back to point 1: Life isn't fair, get a helmet. I'm definately not supporting SOE here, but this sort of shit is like going to a forum to make that last post about why you're leaving. Edit: And holy jesus, she went into pr0n? Die in a hypocrisy fire. THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY IS BASED ON SHAKING BOOBIES TO GET AHEAD, YOU CRAZY BITCH. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 07, 2005, 08:30:21 AM SFW intro page to her site http://www.beautydestroyed.com/
Pretty, has a sense of style, but takes herself a wee bit seriously for my taste. Plus the name reeks of whiney surburban goth. Damn kids need to get off my lawn. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 08:39:24 AM Her job with SOE, unlike her job running a porn site, had nothing to do with boobie shaking. How is there any hypocracy there? The two things are completely unrelated. And booby shaking is NOT part of the real world of business. If people were promoted because their boss solicited sexual favours and they complied, it's beyond wrong. It's unethical, illegal and creates an unhealthy, nasty work environment.
She can't name people, by the way, until her NDA has expired. You don't encourage people to break their NDAs here. In fact, quite the opposite. Why should you encourage her? She could be in a wee bit of trouble for the little she said there anyway. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Surlyboi on December 07, 2005, 08:42:02 AM What Signe said...
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 08:44:13 AM How is Waggling your tits at the uppers in a bid for promotion any different then what has been going on at SOE for I don't know..an age now? Anyone who's been around the "community" or the guide program knows that before you even get accepted :P It's retarded and not right but it happens. Call it practice for your intro into the adult industry. Only if you did something like this in the porn industry well they would videotape it and call it a fetish.
This one is a moron. I feel bad for her. Really. You sad, gamer porn girl #234,789,00000000000000001. This one gets no sympathy from me. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 07, 2005, 09:03:59 AM People who think that endemic sexual harrassment is somehow the fault of the victims are the morons.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 09:06:00 AM And.. how is she not a moron?
I understand the difference here. Point is. Bitching about using sexuality to get ahead and then going forth and using it as your source of income makes your point null and void. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 07, 2005, 09:09:07 AM Nope. The porn industry does not generally involve constant sexual harrassment. There's a difference between getting the tits oot for the lads and having to sleep with the boss to get ahead.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Bunk on December 07, 2005, 09:14:18 AM Yea, sorry Schild, I have to agree with Signe here, the two are not related, and shouldn't be.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Xanthippe on December 07, 2005, 09:24:01 AM Though my first thought after reading this was that I wanted to see Koster's 65-page manual on how to be a good CSR, which means I've been hanging out here far too long. That was my second thought. My first thought was that it was about twice as long as was interesting. I'll disagree that there's no difference between girls who shake their tits for promotions and girls who manage their own pr0n sites. The former would appeal to bottoms; the latter to tops. Different people use different methods. I do wonder at how a person can be so seemingly worldly but actually be quite naive. I've never worked for SOE, but the behavior described doesn't surprise me in the least. The company culture at SOE strikes me (as an outsider) as being rife with corrupt practices insofar as how the employees are treated - just look at how the customers are treated. Why would a person not stop to think that maybe something is rotten at the top tier? (Clearly, I have better things to do right now that I'm avoiding...) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 07, 2005, 09:26:49 AM The original poster didn't say that the girl who got the promotion by shaking her tatas actually slept with anyone. She just said that tata shaker was a flirt. Guess what? Flirts often get the attention of male bosses whether or not they suck at their job. As a matter of fact, without giving any poontang at all, flirts can generally get all kinds of perks and favors just because they are HAWT. When you start talking about an office full of geeks, double that. It isn't sexual harrassment, because it isn't like it goes anywhere. But I have seen it.
We had a few hawt women work at my ad agency a few years ago as account execs. They were hawt, one of which was smoking hawt. I'm not being a pig, or exaggerating, this woman was just attractive. Neither one of them was particularly good at their job. One of them was really bad (or at least took on all the bad habits of her immediate supervisor, who also sucks). Neither got fired. The smoking hawt one could call our sys admin (who was happily married and faithful) and get whatever she wanted immediately, whereas other people in the office would call him and either get voicemail or get put on the backburner. Yes, it sucks. But people respond to flirting especially men. I ain't saying it's right, but it's the way of things. And none of those are things that get people arrested, fired or sued. As for this whole posting, /meh. More juicy, stupid Internet gossip shit that'll be forgotten in a month. Or less. And when it comes to community management, I got a clue for all you motherfuckers working that job. Not only does it suck, but if you have the SLIGHTEST bit of moral compunctions about lying to someone, YOU ARE IN THE WRONG MOTHERFUCKING JOB, DICKHEAD. Public relations (which is what community management is all about) is nothing more than finding the right lies to tell people so they feel ok about giving you their money/vote now and in the future. It is managing truth in such a way that it's palatable to the general public. The people doing it have NO MORALS ABOUT THEIR JOB WHATSOEVER, though they may otherwise be fine people. If you can't handle telling a lie, YOU SHOULD NOT BE IN PUBLIC RELATIONS. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 09:39:23 AM See? Just like I've said all along... MMOs suck. Inside, outside, upside down, with boobies, without boobies... suck.
I'm not entirely sure why we play such evil sucky things. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 07, 2005, 09:40:32 AM Because we like boobies?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 09:45:37 AM You love boobies. All of them. I cry.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 09:47:36 AM Jebus... how many boobies do you have?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 09:48:08 AM 12. Don't you?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Soln on December 07, 2005, 09:49:11 AM Because we like boobies? we have a weener Clicky (http://www.codemasters.com/rfonline/screenshots.php) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 09:54:18 AM Because we like boobies? we have a weener Clicky (http://www.codemasters.com/rfonline/screenshots.php) Keep it in your trousers, Sunshine. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 09:57:40 AM The two things are completely related - how? Because she obviously doesn't have the....ahem... assets to shake for her boss at SOE or wherever so she went into the porn industry where everyone gets off to *something.* I'm more interested in who this person who got the raises was so I can judge for myself if it was titty shaking that got her the raises or if competing with little miss goth w/ the mindset of a 13 year old just wasn't very rough competition.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 07, 2005, 09:58:37 AM She has enough assets to shake them if she wanted. She just didn't want to. She shouldn't have to, but human beings don't do very well at that idealized state of being thing.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 09:59:15 AM Ya know, this is capitalism. You go with what works. Even if it's a bit ethically shady.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 10:10:55 AM She sure looks like she has titties enough to shake if she wanted to stoop to that sort of thing. I see the porn industry and the gaming industry as the same thing... they're both industries. No one should have to work in an atmosphere that mandates if you will not please your boss in ways that are outside the scope of your job, you won't progress as far as someone who does. It's unethical and illegal. Just because people and places like that exist, "ethically shady" as you put it, doesn't mean we should accept it. I have no idea what it's like to work at SOE. If this is common knowledge, I guess I never paid much attention. If I were to get a job there, I would not only be surprised, I would be shocked. Hopefully that doesn't make me an idiot or a moron... I don't think I am.
I don't know, schild... sometimes I get the impression you have very little respect for women. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 10:13:01 AM You just said it, right there. It's unethical and illegal. Hence the reason I don't believe it. I'm attacking it because the whole situation obviously got a little sand in the wrong place. But in reality, I think she didn't get the promotions because she didn't do things in the right corporate way and they went with someone a little more morally flexible when it came to dealing with people on the forums. I can't say I disagree.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 10:23:24 AM Maybe it's not true... I have no idea. Your comments, however, went beyond whether she is truthful or not. You made generalised statements regarding work ethics and morality. You said this:
Quote The two things are completely related - how? Because she obviously doesn't have the....ahem... assets to shake for her boss at SOE or wherever so she went into the porn industry where everyone gets off to *something. And this: Quote Ya know, this is capitalism. You go with what works. Even if it's a bit ethically shady. These are not really the sort of comments to reassure people that one is a person of good character. Maybe you're just being funny or snarky or whatever, but if you actually believe those comments, it makes me sort of sad. This whole country is based on capitalism, which isn't the sort of thing that inspires huge amounts of ethic behaviour, but I know for a fact that there are companies that make sure the work environment is decent. The ones that don't, the "shady" ones, should be forced to change. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Samwise on December 07, 2005, 10:34:34 AM I'm pretty sure that if you get passed up for a promotion solely because someone else shook her tits at the boss, and you can actually demonstrate that (e.g. you can dig up your performance reviews and show that you're obviously better qualified for the job than the tit-shaker), you've got grounds for a lawsuit.
I had to sit through sexual harassment training at work last week and one of the topics covered was the importance of avoiding even the appearance of giving preferential treatment because of sexual favors, since it opens the doors to all sorts of trouble. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 10:43:55 AM Well, I could be idealistic and just, you know, agree. But that would be far too easy and unlike me. And I'm not much of an idealist.
So I'm not sure what makes you sad, me believing that the world isn't peaches and cream or that companies may actually do this sort of shit on a regular basis? At the end of all this it seems more and more obvious to me that this girl didn't get promotions and whatnot simply because she was annoying. I know nothing about her, I don't think I've ever interacted with her or read any of her posts on the SOE forums, but after reading that blog post she annoyed the hell out of me. I can't imagine what dealing with her on an everyday basis would be like. In other words: I don't believe her tale of woe. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: shiznitz on December 07, 2005, 10:46:06 AM In my office, it's not boobs but hair color. Blondes (even bottled blondes) never get yelled at no matter how badly they fuck up.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 10:57:29 AM I was finger waggling sad at you because it sounded as if you were complacent. If you're not, I'll cheer up. If you are, I'll give you such a pince... someday.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 11:02:20 AM I was finger waggling sad at you because it sounded as if you were complacent. If you're not, I'll cheer up. If you are, I'll give you such a pince... someday. Maybe at the annual F13 picnic? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 11:25:21 AM I hope it's as good as the one they had last year.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 11:30:44 AM We have to convince them to bring the lime jello again.
Jello. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Soukyan on December 07, 2005, 11:33:11 AM I hope it's as good as the one they had last year. Someday I'll get an invitation... someday... maybe... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 11:44:06 AM Yes, lime jello is the only flavour I'll wrestle in. Try and convince schild that a cocktail weenie on a Ritz is NOT a grilled hotdog.
You don't want to go through the invitation ritual, Soukyan. I still can't wipe the image from my eyes or get the taste out of my mouth. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: shiznitz on December 07, 2005, 12:47:11 PM Yeah, that bleachy taste sticks with ya the whole day.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: WayAbvPar on December 07, 2005, 12:57:05 PM I failed my google-fu roll. I desperately wanted to post a pic of Roy Munson drinking 'milk' out of a bucket.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 07, 2005, 02:38:04 PM It seems to me that the majority of situations where one woman is resentful over another woman receiving a promotion, and blaming it on "jiggling titties", it's a result of some insecurity or other issue, and much less about any substance. Not that such promotions don't, haven't, or can't happen - just that they are much more rare than complaining women would lead you to believe.
Maybe she did get passed up due to lack of jiggles. I would be more likely to guess that it is her personality (she says she kept to herself - not a desirable attribute for management), hated her job (often such distaste is apparent), hated management (previous++), did not put in hours apparently necessary (sorry, but if it takes "18 hour days" to stand out, then that's what you do), and that management knew about her "hobbies" (would make execs wary). Depends on how lax the cluture is, but if she was walking around with piercings while on the job, that might be a strike against her too (unprofessional). All in all, she sounds far too much like a malcontent. I wouldn't promote someone like her either. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Evil Elvis on December 07, 2005, 02:40:30 PM The chick disliked her previous job, and made (what appears to be) a single post about it. It's not like she called the BBB or filed some lawsuit. I really don't see what she's done to draw anyone's ire on this. Just because she was a bit naive in expecing the general populace to be more than walking, talking shit-bags doesn't mean she deserves to be slammed for it.
Or are we just being callow dickheads today? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 02:45:56 PM The chick disliked her previous job, and made (what appears to be) a single post about it. It's not like she called the BBB or filed some lawsuit. I really don't see what she's done to draw anyone's ire on this. Just because she was a bit naive in expecing the general populace to be more than walking, talking shit-bags doesn't mean she deserves to be slammed for it. Or are we just being callow dickheads today? We're not being callow dickheads. She's being the WindupNutsackette of SOE. She should have filed a lawsuit if what she says is true. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Samwise on December 07, 2005, 02:48:49 PM She should have filed a lawsuit if what she says is true. That's pretty much my take. If her story is true, then it's reprehensible, but there are laws in place that are supposed to help prevent that sort of thing, and she's not taking advantage of them. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Evil Elvis on December 07, 2005, 02:59:49 PM So now she's obligated to hiring a lawyer, and filing a lawsuit because she felt her boss was a prick?
Do you realise how absurd that sounds? Edit: It's possible her boss didn't do anything she could prove as sexual harrasment. It's possible it skirted the law. It's possible it's all some insecure fantasy she made up to make herself feel better. I don't care. It's a post on a website about disliking her job. People bitch about their jobs every day. I don't see what the big deal here is. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 03:01:22 PM Not everyone in this world is as litigious as you guys seem to be. Righ had a good lawsuit against the last company he worked for, everyone including lawyers agreed but we didn't sue. Why? Mostly because I didn't think I could handle the stress. So don't be so eager to assume your nature is everyone's... it's not.
As for Roac: It's a blessing to have someone like yourself around here to set all us women straight. I don't know where we get our wild ideas. Must be all those hormones or something. And about not promoting people because they have piercings because it's an indication you are malcontent... (http://gallery.photographyreview.com/data/photography/524/242049/stick-in-the-mud.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 07, 2005, 03:01:47 PM So now she's obligated to hiring a lawyer, and filing a lawsuit because she felt her boss was a prick? Do you realise how absurd that sounds? Not because her boss was a prick. If she thought her boss was promoting based on sexual favors (or sexual discrimination), she's either obliged to hire a lawyer and deal with it or shut the fuck up and stop whining on the Internet. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Samwise on December 07, 2005, 03:03:11 PM If it was preventing her from doing her job well, it's not absurd at all. Again, those laws exist for a reason. Companies like SOE have an obligation not to create hostile work environments or somesuch.
On the other hand, if she's happier now and has no regrets about leaving SOE, then I agree it'd be silly to sue because they haven't really hurt her. Which makes the silly thing the fact that she's slinging wild accusations on her blog. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 07, 2005, 03:03:31 PM Isn't your blog where you get to whine and complain?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 03:04:37 PM So now she's obligated to hiring a lawyer, and filing a lawsuit because she felt her boss was a prick? Do you realise how absurd that sounds? Yes. Because that's not what we're saying, at all. She's not obligated to anything. It's just what she should do. Victim of a horrendous amount of sexual harrassment and you can prove it? Go for it. Of course, if I were SOE I'd be all over her ass for libel if it weren't true. Freedom of press doesn't protect you from making your ex-employer look like a bunch of sexual harrasing shovanistic jacktards. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Stephen Zepp on December 07, 2005, 03:10:15 PM Isn't your blog where you get to whine and complain? I have to go with Signe here--it's not like she went to PCGamer and did an interview or something. She posted an entry in her own .blog...look at it from this perspective: f13 posts more derogatory/libellious statements daily in a public forum, and f13 aims itself to be a community information release point for gamers...throwing stones and all you know? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Nebu on December 07, 2005, 03:12:20 PM I'm of the opinion most lawsuits of this type are more wars of attrition than a search for the truth. I can understand why she wouldn't want to sue given the big picture.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tige on December 07, 2005, 03:33:51 PM ...look at it from this perspective: f13 posts more derogatory/libellious statements daily in a public forum, and f13 aims itself to be a community information release point for gamers...throwing stones and all you know? Ziiiinnnngg!!! Cheap Shot. Subjective opinions of games and swags about whats going on behind the scenes are quite different than alleging criminal/civil wrongdoing. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Evil Elvis on December 07, 2005, 03:34:52 PM I didn't read anything on her post that screamed sexual harassment or sexual discrimination.
Your boss saying he's gonna need a beej if you want your Christmas bonus: illegal. Your boss being nice to women who shake their ass and titties: not illegal. If some unqualified ass kisser got a promotion over you, would you file a lawsuit? Or would try to get on with your life, and find a better job headed by a better class of people? We have to deal with things we feel are unfair all the time, but that doesn't mean we're always entitled to sue, or that it's even in our best interest. And to hold some woman on a forum-moderator salary accountable for taking on the SOE legal deparment because her boss acted like a typical guy? Crazy. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 07, 2005, 03:38:25 PM Angry goth chick refuses to debase herself for money so she goes and debases herself for money.
Wake me when she gets around to doing some penetration. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Stephen Zepp on December 07, 2005, 03:42:38 PM ...look at it from this perspective: f13 posts more derogatory/libellious statements daily in a public forum, and f13 aims itself to be a community information release point for gamers...throwing stones and all you know? Ziiiinnnngg!!! Cheap Shot. Subjective opinions of games and swags about whats going on behind the scenes are quite different than alleging criminal/civil wrongdoing. I didn't see anywhere in what was posted where she alleged criminal/civil wrongdoing. She made a blog entry in response to a discussion elsewhere regarding her personal reasons for leaving SOE, including a couple of examples about why she felt she was treated unfairly. Alternatively known as posting her subjective opinions about game developers and personal observations about what was going on behind the scenes. I also don't think that f13 violates any criminal/civil laws...that wasn't my point. I was more focused on the fact that we here make some pretty strong observations about our opinions, some of which could be taken much more personally than anything I saw her write ;) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 03:50:51 PM I didn't see anywhere in what was posted where she alleged criminal/civil wrongdoing. She made a blog entry in response to a discussion elsewhere regarding her personal reasons for leaving SOE, including a couple of examples about why she felt she was treated unfairly. Alternatively known as posting her subjective opinions about game developers and personal observations about what was going on behind the scenes. Quote from: Pr0n Star Wanna know what turned me off about SOE? Well, first off I watched a girl with NO experience at all get promoted over me because she waggled her tits at her boss. I'm not an office flirt whatsoever and tend to keep to myself, so I totally lost on that front because I wasn't willing to go the hoebag omg-let-me-sit-on-ur-lap route. I was more like "gtf out of my cube and let me work in peace, you fag" so, no promotions for me. Strike one. Strike two was the fact that executive staff at SOE just kept making idiotic decisions and leaving Community Relations to clean up the mess. They outright lied to the customer base on several occasions and made me, who would have preferred to say "yeah we lied, our bad", make up excuses and bullshit that I knew the customer base wouldn't buy. I HATED that. Strike three was the management change. I do not refer to the promotion of Gallenite - that dude was seriously one of my favorite people at the entire company and a total badass to work with - or really to Blackguard either because he busted his ass and really loved the game. Largely it was the "we want more but will give you less to do it with" atmosphere, the 65-fucking-page-long manual on how to be a good Rep written by Raph Koster, having meetings in order to schedule meetings (wtf??) and Brenlo constantly micromanaging everything once he got promoted. Prior to that, I liked him just fine and as a person I still do; I just would never want to work under him again because he wants in on everything and I hate that. All this, coupled with the fact that the job was completely dead-end unless I wanted to flash some titty or work 18 hour days + in unpaid overtime in order to kiss someone's ass hard enough that they would move me onto a different team pretty much killed the magic for me. I still have a good view of the company but yeah...I was just done with it. 2 years with no movement at all? Fuck that. If I have to jiggle my tits in order to get somewhere then I'll do that on my own time where I'll get paid more to do it. Pure logic, that. That is a clean cut case of sexual harassment. Ironically, if any of it were true I'd believe the part about her calling her boss a fag before the "tits" gal shows up and takes her precious promotion. I like the second highlighted part though because it shows - A. That she didn't deserve the raise because she has the maturity level of a 3rd grader and B. She's obviously willing to wave her tits around. I just hope she didn't suck any dick on the way through the parking lot. Seriously, she should be blacklisted from the gaming community for this shit. It's the direct opposite of EA_Spouse. Quote I also don't think that f13 violates any criminal/civil laws...that wasn't my point. We're more of the whistleblowing type than the "break the laws" type. This woman on the other hand is a whistleblower who might be able to make a solid case but instead takes her deep swelling (har) aggression out on a digital diary. Not a news site. A diary. Quote I was more focused on the fact that we here make some pretty strong observations about our opinions, some of which could be taken much more personally than anything I saw her write ;) We're obviously satire (at LEAST 90% of the time) while this kooky chick obviously isn't. Also, we don't take responsibility for what our crazy ass posters type (and we love each and every one of you. Well almost each and every one). Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Stephen Zepp on December 07, 2005, 04:00:30 PM Dude--she responded to multiple posts on the Internet about her, giving her position. And in my personal opinion, actually did it with a good combination of "keep it real" language/descriptions, and at least semi-professionalism.
There is a really big difference between being in a game development job but feeling any pressure whatsoever to use sexual advantages to advance, and being in the porn industry where using sexual advantages to advance is a willing choice, not a pressured one. And, she did it on her own personal blog, not in a place designed specifically to attract a focused audience relavent to the topic she posted about. There are hundreds of blogs that are orders of magnitude worse than what she posted, and my personal opinion is that this wasn't an attack, but simply a response. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 04:06:18 PM Did you just say "keep it real" language and mean it? In reality land where I'm from I'd call what she said "tactless" and "bad form." But hey, who am I to judge, her job was basically public relations.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Simond on December 07, 2005, 04:10:12 PM Did you just say "keep it real" language and mean it? In reality land where I'm from I'd call what she said "tactless" and "bad form." But hey, who am I to judge, her job was basically public relations. Tactless and bad form usually get you promoted at SOE (cf Brenlo).Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Evil Elvis on December 07, 2005, 04:17:53 PM That is a clean cut case of sexual harassment. No, it's not. It would be sexual discrimination. If true, it wouldn't change her right to file suit, but it's the sort of thing that makes a big difference when you're looking for a new job anyway. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Nija on December 07, 2005, 04:19:10 PM heh, I've actually met this chick.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 07, 2005, 04:35:19 PM As for Roac: It's a blessing to have someone like yourself around here to set all us women straight. I don't know where we get our wild ideas. Must be all those hormones or something. And about not promoting people because they have piercings because it's an indication you are malcontent... Whenever people fail, the gut reaction is to blame someone else. Everyone does it, but women have certain cards they can play. Race is another. Age is another. It's easy to cry discrimination, and people often do when it's unwarranted. Everyone has some damn excuse, and some people feel the need to insert more drama into theirs than others. If it's not something this dramatic, it's something else. They are brown nosers, they have connections, whatever. But it can't - mustn't - be because of some failing in the person doing the whining. Sorry, I don't buy it. I've seen far too much of it. And yes, there are people who really do get screwed over illegal reasons. But if they are mature, they will either take the legal recourse, or just deal with it and move on with life. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 07, 2005, 04:38:41 PM I have to go with Signe here--it's not like she went to PCGamer and did an interview or something. Yes, it is exactly like that. The only difference is in readership, and that is something unknowable. Her entry could easily get /.'d and get 10x what PCGamer would ever draw. This wasn't an entry into a diary, it was made in public. Public statements invite response. Air your dirty laundry, and people are likely to tell you that you stink. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Margalis on December 07, 2005, 04:46:22 PM Blogs are the new personal homepage - nobody gives a shit 99% of the time.
What is the problem here? Some person is bitching about their former work on a blog. Ok. Maybe she was harrassed, maybe she wasn't. We don't know, and that's all there is to it. There is no deeper analysis possible. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 04:49:34 PM Blogs are the new personal homepage - nobody gives a shit 99% of the time. The gaming industry is small and desperate for drama. This fits the bill. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 07, 2005, 04:50:48 PM Forums are the water cooler of the internet - nobody gives a shit 99% of the time.
What's the problem here? Some people are bitching about someone else who said something. Ok. Maybe it was true, maybe it wasn't. We don't know, but the point of water coolers are to rehash that sort of thing. No other reason need exist. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Reg on December 07, 2005, 04:54:29 PM I wonder if she'd be taking less heat over what was a pretty tame post criticizing her previous employers if she hadn't spurned a job that so many here would have been thrilled to take, with a pay cut, just for the entry into the gaming industry?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Typhon on December 07, 2005, 04:58:55 PM She should have just sucked cock, if it's good enough for the players, it's good enough for the reps.
:rimshot: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 07, 2005, 05:00:10 PM Nice hips.
That's my water cooler comment. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 07, 2005, 05:05:17 PM I don't like her.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 07, 2005, 05:06:00 PM I don't like her. I don't think your avatar does either. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Merusk on December 07, 2005, 05:06:55 PM Angry goth chick refuses to debase herself for money so she goes and debases herself for money. Wake me when she gets around to doing some penetration. She won't, it's in her 'hire me' info. Girl on Girl only, no girl on guy. If you go read the 'about malice' section at the above-linked site you'll see she's one effed up person. "I don't do porn because daddy touched me, how dare you assert that. Yes, he touched me, but I do it because I like it." Err.. ko. She's a hot, whiny goth chick who'll have fuckall for a career once gravity hits her. This was posted over on Corp a while ago, and I've checked out the site/ blog a few times since then. (Free shots of nice tits do that for a guy.) While I agree that there is NOTHING acceptable at all about Sexual Harassment, I'm more inclined to believe - based on what I've read - that it's a delusion. She's ALWAYS the victim, everyone's out to get her, or fuck her over, or see how much shit they can dump on her. I'm more inclined to believe that Bush has a master plan for Iraq than I am the SOE allegations from her at this point. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 07, 2005, 05:15:21 PM I don't like her. I don't think your avatar does either. But both my avatar and me agree: We want to read Raph's 65 page manual. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Margalis on December 07, 2005, 08:11:42 PM I'm more inclined to believe that Bush has a master plan for Iraq than I am the SOE allegations from her at this point. OH SNAP! I will say I agree with what Roac said: If you have a disdain for work that will probably come through to other people and turn them off. But who knows - or cares. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Margalis on December 07, 2005, 08:15:50 PM I understand the difference here. Point is. Bitching about using sexuality to get ahead and then going forth and using it as your source of income makes your point null and void. Err...that's like saying a football player can't complain if you tackle him and start to beat him up while he is grocery shopping. In porn sexuality is the commodity you bring to the table. At most other jobs it isn't supposed to be. I'm not black so I probably wouldn't be hired to play a black man in a movie - does that mean it's also ok to not hire me for any other job? Yeah..not really. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 07, 2005, 09:11:28 PM I understand the difference here. Point is. Bitching about using sexuality to get ahead and then going forth and using it as your source of income makes your point null and void. Err...that's like saying a football player can't complain if you tackle him and start to beat him up while he is grocery shopping. That is a bad analogy. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 07, 2005, 10:44:50 PM Hrm. Honestly, other than teh boobies i'm not sure why this is a story we care about. From what i can read, she wasn't sexually harrased at work, at least not to the point where a lawsuit is a reasonable recourse. The jiggly bitch who got the promotion may have been unprofessional, and the manager who promoted her incompetent, but these are HR issues, not legal ones.
Primarily this peaks our interest because of two points: * She's relatively hawt * She does goth porn Otherwise it's a relatively dull story of a CSR who chose to move on. Big Whoop. Dunno, i just don't buy that she is either a martyr illuminating the vicious harrasement and sexism of America's corporate underbelly - or that she is a manipulative vixen playing the hearts and minds of innocent gamers. She's a relatively attractive CSR/Dev who realized that pr0n pays better than a 9-7 corporate job. Wow. Big revelation... not. Having seen her site I can say that she can shake it plenty well, and well, to be a pig - i'd hit it. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 07, 2005, 10:51:01 PM (http://forumpics.info/main.php?g2_view=core:DownloadItem&g2_itemId=1411&g2_serialNumber=2)
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 07, 2005, 11:17:12 PM No. Please.
Besides, she looks like the type who hits back guys who say "I'd hit it". Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 07, 2005, 11:58:32 PM I understand the difference here. Point is. Bitching about using sexuality to get ahead and then going forth and using it as your source of income makes your point null and void. Err...that's like saying a football player can't complain if you tackle him and start to beat him up while he is grocery shopping. In porn sexuality is the commodity you bring to the table. At most other jobs it isn't supposed to be. I'm not black so I probably wouldn't be hired to play a black man in a movie - does that mean it's also ok to not hire me for any other job? Yeah..not really. Should I have said: in this instance? Maybe that would have cushioned my point a bit better for you? She's allowed to complain about the atmosphere at her work as much as she likes. Just like we are allowed to give our opinion on it if she chooses to make it public. She did. I expressed my opinion. I think that if you complain on a blog about being passed over due to one girl jiggling her breasticles and the uppers drooling and promoting her over a more moral you, and you don't do something to rectify the situation while you are in it: I.E. Tell a supervisor, tell someone over that supervisor, complain to HR then you are a contributing factor to the very situation in which you are bitching and moaning about. As for this one.. Hope she enjoys her job and doesn't bitch about being sexually harassed in this one. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: 5150 on December 08, 2005, 01:56:28 AM Gotta agree with wanting to read Raph's manual
A Theory of Support perhaps? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 08, 2005, 02:34:49 AM Besides, she looks like the type who hits back guys who say "I'd hit it". I would bet that every woman i've ever been intimate with would hit someone who used "I'd hit it" seriously. That said, i don't understand your aversion, she's pretty cute imo, not really my type but she's got some confidence, relatively pretty face, nice bod. So ya, what Ronald up there said. EDIT: And to stay on topic - i don't think she has done anything that should result in her being villified, by the same token by her own description she obviously wasn't a fit at SOE. I once managed a fairly senior team lead (reporting and metrics) who in turn had a team of 2 people. Awesome lady - also a stripper in her spare time to both make coin and get kinda naughty. Didn't effect my evaluation of her nor her teams, but then she was awesome at her day job. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Slyfeind on December 08, 2005, 02:54:28 AM I have seen cases of a girl who giggles more often and does less-than-adequate work, gets promoted over the fat dude who kicks ass at his job.
I have also seen cases of girls being passed up for promotion based on their merit, and they blow it all out of proportion. They bring on the drama. I can't remember the comedian who said it, but at every job a woman works at, there's always another woman "out to destroy me!!!" If it's a mega-corporation, you're screwed, because they can afford better lawyers than you. Yeah, it sucks, it's unethical, there are laws, but they got the cash and you don't. Sucks, huh? Hell yes it sucks. It sucks so much hairy llama balls that...well, it just sucks. (Insert some analogy with sucking llama balls, and Chile wool exports, and llamas being sterile from all the ball-sucking. Or something. I was giggling to myself when I wrote it, but it just looked stupid on the screen.) But ultimately, you just gotta pack up and move on. Which is what she did. And I don't blame her for bitching about it. I would, too. Because it sucks hairy llama balls. Also bear in mind men are genetically programmed to butt heads over pieces of ass and chunks of meat, then go to sleep for the rest of the day. THESE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE IN CHARGE OF CORPORATIONS. Women have been genetically programmed to take care of everybody when the men get themselves killed after butting heads. These people should be in charge of companies. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 08, 2005, 03:05:49 AM My second point is this: men are genetically programmed to butt heads over pieces of ass and chunks of meat, then go to sleep for the rest of the day. THESE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE IN CHARGE OF CORPORATIONS. Women have been genetically programmed to take care of everybody when the men get themselves killed after butting heads. These people should be in charge of companies. Agreed. I aspire to senior management - i've worked for $1 billion dollar plus software companies for about 10 years now, after a 6 year stint in adverstising. I got my MBA part-time recently as it's a must have for roles above director. All only relevant in that my experience has taught me that regardless of management education and industry i'd generally much rather have a team of women reporting to me and i'd much rather report to a woman. They just seem to get shit done better. That said, i've had several absolutley stellar male bosses, i don't want to generalize but overall my experience is consistant with Sly's. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 08, 2005, 03:05:55 AM And to stay on topic Umm...Which topic is that? :wink: That said, i don't understand your aversion No aversion here. I just never liked the statement "I'd hit it". Not sure why. It's a kind of "Stifler-ish", I guess......And I'd rather "hit" Stifler, if anyone. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 06:21:21 AM I don't understand what "Stifler" means.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 06:28:56 AM I like hot naked goth girls, though there's so much free pron out there that I'd never pay a pay site. I don't see the big deal about someone bitching on the internet, it's pretty much standard practice, though she does seem to be of the Internet.Serious.Business. set, when in actuality who really gives a shit about hordes of people you'll never see, meet or do?
I am aroused (mentally) by the idea of seeing Raph's CS manual though.. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 08, 2005, 06:34:53 AM Assuming Raph wrote a 65 page manual - why would he? Not that he doesn't have a talent for writing, but I'd have figured there's a manager over CS who would be better suited to the task.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Sky on December 08, 2005, 06:44:30 AM I love lamp.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 07:19:41 AM Assuming Raph wrote a 65 page manual - why would he? Not that he doesn't have a talent for writing, but I'd have figured there's a manager over CS who would be better suited to the task. He ran a big, huge MUD, didn't he? I was admin on one of those... it's all about handling people, innit? I bet he did an excellent job on that sort of manual. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 07:22:47 AM So I started reading Lum's site after the linkage on another thread and I hobbled onto this amusing link about PornGothGirl.
http://www.anyuzer.com/archives/159.php Some of you have probably already seen it, but it adds a bit of interesting perspective to the guesses of her personality. Anyone here like peanuts? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 07:27:27 AM Here's the thing, despite my harsh words, I don't mean to crucify this girl. I just want to knock her back to reality land. She shat on a job most people would do for free, complained about someone getting a job position over her on a blog that she knows ex-employees will find out about, and then went into porn. Though, she apparently had already done some porn. Or something. Really, none of that matters to me. At the end of the day she's in desperate need of a smack with the cluebat.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 08, 2005, 07:33:06 AM He ran a big, huge MUD, didn't he? I was admin on one of those... it's all about handling people, innit? I bet he did an excellent job on that sort of manual. I wasn't insulting his qualifications, hence the disclaimer. I would think, however, that a CS manager is better suited to writing policies for CS, as opposed to a designer/architect/creative lead. I admin'd a big, huge MUD for a while too, as well as worked as lead forum mod, but my full time job is IT and I'm not particularly inclined to do someone else's job without there being a very pressing need (I have more than enough to occupy me that is mine already). So, I'm just curious why he would. I'd guess due to some personal interest with it, but I'm still curious. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 08, 2005, 07:38:07 AM Sigh.
One might almost imagine she's creating this torrent of publicity to generate traffic for her website. Almost. Whore. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: d4rkj3di on December 08, 2005, 08:24:45 AM Here's the thing, despite my harsh words, I don't mean to crucify this girl. I just want to knock her back to reality land. She shat on a job most people would do for free, complained about someone getting a job position over her on a blog that she knows ex-employees will find out about, and then went into porn. Though, she apparently had already done some porn. Or something. Really, none of that matters to me. At the end of the day she's in desperate need of a smack with the cluebat. Anyone who would choose to work at a job for a large game company for free, is an idiot. I think what schild is trying to tell us, is that most people are idiots. As to Faarwolf/Malice, I think she already is in reality land, and has a firmer grasp on it than most. At least she's not a Fragdoll.Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 08:29:53 AM Anyone who would choose to work at a job for a large game company for free, is an idiot. I think what schild is trying to tell us, is that most people are idiots. As to Faarwolf/Malice, I think she already is in reality land, and has a firmer grasp on it than most. At least she's not a Fragdoll. A fragdoll writing "LAST POST, LOL!!11!!" would have been more acceptable than a forum moderator going off the handle. But the more I think about it, and I'm not trying to start a crusade here or anything, maybe forum moderators should be paid more. They are the ones who, after all, deal with all of the customer bullshit on the front lines. But it's a thankless job. Anyone knows that going in - or at least should know that. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Xanthippe on December 08, 2005, 08:49:50 AM Forum mods don't get paid?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 08:53:52 AM Forum mods don't get paid? More implies too little for the job. Not "none." Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Hoax on December 08, 2005, 08:58:41 AM 1. This should be heading for the den... somebody must be offended about something in here.
2. Where is raph, I too want to read at least the meeting section of the manual to confirm the meetings to schedule meetings angle. 3. You should all be ashamed for something, depends on who you are!@!! 4. I'm giving the "best theory" award to: she wants more traffic to her pr0n site. :Love_Letters: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 09:47:15 AM Half of you guys here need a good spanking. But why should I? It's not as if you pay me!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Nebu on December 08, 2005, 09:55:43 AM Half of you guys here need a good spanking. But why should I? It's not as if you pay me! Step 1: Get a webcam. Step 2: ? ? ? Step 3: PROFIT! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 08, 2005, 10:10:12 AM I don't understand what "Stifler" means. (http://kino.tiscali.cz/apollo/pictures/20039583553167004.jpg) Obnoxious dude from American Pie. Representative of the modern day frat boy idiot. I don't know where exactly "I'd hit it" came from though. Maybe Jay from Jay and Silent Bob? Sounds like something he'd say too. Either way, the saying has run it's course. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 08, 2005, 10:11:20 AM 1. This should be heading for the den... somebody must be offended about something in here. You can see her whenever it rains From Rome to New Orleans dancing on the graves Burden by the heart she loves her sunglasses after dark And every single day her little life falls apart She's out to look so macabre and alone She's close to hook on her dying Just like a gothic girl Lost in the darken world My lil' gothic girl Darkerside jewel are your razor cuts for real baby You can see she's on her road to ruin Stigmata from crucifixion on her pale white skin Tribal pagan art she loves her tatooed egyptian mark And every single day her love will tear us apart Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 08, 2005, 10:12:35 AM Singsong Nonono. It's no fun if you try to get it denned. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 08, 2005, 10:14:55 AM Singsong Nonono. It's no fun if you try to get it denned. No fun for you maybe. I'm having a ball. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 10:15:48 AM Everyone should try and get it denned. The mods should try and restrain themselves and let's see which lyrics break them.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: WayAbvPar on December 08, 2005, 10:27:33 AM I am not denning it until I get paid for being a mod. I'll be over here, holding my breath.
Maybe I should threaten to start my own porn site. I think there would be a healthy profit margin from people paying me NOT to post pics of myself naked... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 10:35:05 AM I think there would be a healthy profit margin from people paying me NOT to post pics of myself naked... I would pay for that. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 08, 2005, 11:11:32 AM f13 posts more derogatory/libellious statements daily in a public forum You goddamn right. Glad of you to notice. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 08, 2005, 11:18:00 AM I wonder if she'd be taking less heat over what was a pretty tame post criticizing her previous employers if she hadn't spurned a job that so many here would have been thrilled to take, with a pay cut, just for the entry into the gaming industry? Anyone willing to take a pay cut just to work in the games industry at HER former job (i.e. SOE community flak) deserves to get treated to EA-style hours, MickeyD's pay, and orgies she can't join in going on around him/her 24 hours a day. I mean, shit, there's working for peanuts, and working to be beaten severely about the head and neck with a purple King Kong dildo. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 08, 2005, 11:22:03 AM Assuming Raph wrote a 65 page manual - why would he? Not that he doesn't have a talent for writing, but I'd have figured there's a manager over CS who would be better suited to the task. Not based on SOE's track record before Raph got there. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 08, 2005, 11:29:44 AM Assuming Raph wrote a 65 page manual - why would he? Not that he doesn't have a talent for writing, but I'd have figured there's a manager over CS who would be better suited to the task. Well, they had him design SWG. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: shiznitz on December 08, 2005, 11:56:52 AM Everyone coming down hard on this woman should be ashamed of themselves. We all know that women who do porn for a living are perfectly well-adjusted human beings.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Alkiera on December 08, 2005, 01:37:05 PM Everyone coming down hard on this woman should be ashamed of themselves. We all know that women who do porn for a living are perfectly well-adjusted human beings. I think the green was overkill. Anyone who bothered to look at her bio knows she's got more than a few issues. Abusive drugged up parents, school peer problems, leaving home at 16, doing drugs herself... Yeah. Well adjusted. Alkiera Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 08, 2005, 01:43:10 PM Everyone coming down hard on this woman should be ashamed of themselves. We all know that women who do porn for a living are perfectly well-adjusted human beings. I think the green was overkill. Anyone who bothered to look at her bio knows she's got more than a few issues. Abusive drugged up parents, school peer problems, leaving home at 16, doing drugs herself... Yeah. Well adjusted. And she seems to be anti-Raph. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Hoax on December 08, 2005, 02:05:47 PM I think we should organize an online petition for her to remove all anti-Raph sentiment from her nudie and/or blog sites? :roll:
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: shiznitz on December 08, 2005, 02:12:42 PM Everyone coming down hard on this woman should be ashamed of themselves. We all know that women who do porn for a living are perfectly well-adjusted human beings. I think the green was overkill. Anyone who bothered to look at her bio knows she's got more than a few issues. Abusive drugged up parents, school peer problems, leaving home at 16, doing drugs herself... Yeah. Well adjusted. Alkiera This thread is overkill. I was trying to kill it. I failed. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Alkiera on December 08, 2005, 02:15:12 PM Everyone coming down hard on this woman should be ashamed of themselves. We all know that women who do porn for a living are perfectly well-adjusted human beings. I think the green was overkill. Anyone who bothered to look at her bio knows she's got more than a few issues. Abusive drugged up parents, school peer problems, leaving home at 16, doing drugs herself... Yeah. Well adjusted. And she seems to be anti-male. FIFY Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 02:15:32 PM Try harder. Sing something. Post some hobbit pr0n. That usually gets someone right on it.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Malathor on December 08, 2005, 02:44:08 PM This is the dumbest thread I've ever read here. What a load of sanctimonious bullshit.
And she seems to be anti-Raph. Then she's more qualified to be running SOE than the current management. Is there some other relevance to any of this? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Evil Elvis on December 08, 2005, 02:49:49 PM Then she's more qualified to be running SOE than the current management. Is there some other relevance to any of this? Zing! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 02:54:04 PM This is the dumbest thread I've ever read here. What a load of sanctimonious bullshit. Having started the thread, I have to ask, do you know what that means? Or were you not talking to me. Because, having read back, I was being anything BUT sanctimonious. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Malathor on December 08, 2005, 03:14:00 PM This is the dumbest thread I've ever read here. What a load of sanctimonious bullshit. Having started the thread, I have to ask, do you know what that means? Or were you not talking to me. Because, having read back, I was being anything BUT sanctimonious. We're not being callow dickheads. She's being the WindupNutsackette of SOE. She should have filed a lawsuit if what she says is true. Oh, please. One line from a blog turned into a semi-serious discussion of sexual harassment in the workplace? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Raph on December 08, 2005, 05:59:50 PM I honestly cannot believe how much attention the throwaway remark about the 65 page community relations policies manual has gotten. :P
I wrote it when I was asked to create a community relations dept at SOE. That happened shortly after I got the CCO job. Prior to that, there was no dept, there were CRMs on individual games, and there was no consistent policy. EQ had no forums, SWG had extnsive community stuff, other games were somewhere in between. The manual says, in short form, - if you're not into community, here's why you should do it: retention, acquisition, respecting your customer. Here's some hard data to prove it. - the jobs you need are: mods, events person (if you will do that part), community relations manager, possibly assts to them, and QA/CS liaison. Here's handy job descs you can use when hiring. - btw, the CRM for a game should be considered a lead on the team - you need to meet regularly with the following folks: marketing, CS, QA, producers, team leads. You need to tell them what's up, what the community is antsy about, what stuff you're doing, and you need to hear what stuff they are doing with the game - you should be doing the following: forum posts (multiple a day). Newsletters -- not marketingy ones either. Features on the website including behind the scenes stuff. Fun little contests and such on the forums. Showcasing player-made stuff, like art, fan films, roleplaying, etc. You really should think about having a correspondent program. - btw, yes, you need to run forums. All our games will have forums henceforth. Here's the stock policies on bannings, etc. - here's some advice on handling problems: always be honest, be prompt, don't overpromise, etc etc. - here's the escalation process when something goes all woppy-jawed. - here's some books and websites tht might be helpful (Amy Jo Kim's book, etc) - now, the entire second half of the manual is the latest boring legal policies that you have to post on all the sites. That's pretty much it. We then proceeded to get forums for every game, CRMs for every game, and most of the doc implemented. And then Alan took over running the newly created dept. The End. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 08, 2005, 06:02:25 PM Sure you claim that's all there was, but you left out the neat-o cartoons on every other page!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 08, 2005, 06:05:22 PM I honestly cannot believe how much attention the throwaway remark about the 65 page community relations policies manual has gotten. :P Well, other than the boobies that was pretty much the most interesting tidbit in this whole teacup sized tempest. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Merusk on December 08, 2005, 07:09:53 PM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/)
With that I think the thread can die. :-D Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 07:13:40 PM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/) With that I think the thread can die. :-D Quote ere we have a bunch of geeks who probably have never even laid eyes on a real woman whose last name wasn't Dotjaypeegee talking shit about me...why? Those are big blocks of text describing her current customer base. You know what she needs? Community relations. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 08, 2005, 08:10:42 PM I honestly cannot believe how much attention the throwaway remark about the 65 page community relations policies manual has gotten. :P Well, honestly, the throwaway remark was the most interesting thing she said. Good points, btw. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 08, 2005, 08:31:34 PM Boring article.
At least she's kind of attractive. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 08:44:37 PM We love Raph and need to know every aspect of his life. Especially the bits he doesn't want us to know. He has kind eyes and a sweet smile, too.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Surlyboi on December 08, 2005, 08:48:21 PM We love Raph and need to know every aspect of his life. Especially the bits he doesn't want us to know. He has kind eyes and a sweet smile, too. But would you hit it? :evil: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 08:49:27 PM We love Raph and need to know every aspect of his life. Especially the bits he doesn't want us to know. He has kind eyes and a sweet smile, too. But would you hit it? :evil: HRose would. Edit: We're talking about Raph, rite? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Surlyboi on December 08, 2005, 08:53:19 PM Yeah, Raph.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 08:55:41 PM I'm a married woman. Of course I wouldn't "hit it". But he does have kind eyes and a sweet smile and I'm sure he gets offers from people wanting to hit him all the time.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 08, 2005, 09:00:14 PM Are you taking bets on that? I could use some easy money. :evil:
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 09:25:26 PM I'm a married woman. Of course I wouldn't "hit it". But he does have kind eyes and a sweet smile and I'm sure he gets offers from people wanting to hit him all the time. Am I the only person here that hasn't seen what Raph looks like? Now I feel cheated. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 09:28:46 PM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/) That is one angry attention whore, and just a whore in general.With that I think the thread can die. :-D Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 09:35:00 PM I'd say she's a bit upset at the attention this has been getting.
Poor girl. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 09:36:02 PM She's more upset that people insulted her ability to perform tech work.
I insult her ability to stay on the meds. Jesus. It would have been classy to say nothing. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 08, 2005, 09:53:45 PM Well, now someone has linked her site to this site. This will end in pear shaped tears.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Slyfeind on December 08, 2005, 09:54:04 PM Am I the only person here that hasn't seen what Raph looks like? Now I feel cheated. Wow, surely you jest. But in case you're serious, http://www.raphkoster.com. See him play the guitar! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 09:55:42 PM Well, now someone has linked her site to this site. This will end in Indeed. And I haven't even had the chance to say that the only nude "modeling" is in an art class. If someone's jerking off to you, it's porn. But hey, what do I know about semantics or art. Edit: Ooooooh, it was someone anonymous. We should hire a private investigator. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 08, 2005, 09:59:10 PM Well, now someone has linked her site to this site. This will end in pear shaped tears. Yeah, that almost never ends well. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 10:05:23 PM I'm still trying to decide who is worse now since people are starting to get really ANGRY. over the INTERNET.
Us for the whole "lol internet" discussion where we chuckle amoung ourselves for stating the obvious (that she's a whore, and an angry one at that) and slapping eachother on the back because HOO BOY WE SURE PEGGED HER (despite however right we may be). Or her, for being an angry whore. She should just shrug, turn on the webcam, and make out with her ugly girlfriend some more. She's gotta be at least a subscription or two up with all this fun internet going on. I do give her one thing though, while she's around a 7/10 after the liberal use of photoshop and eyeliner, she knows good site design. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 08, 2005, 10:14:21 PM (http://www.betweenthecovers.com/images/59182.jpg)
Oh wait, was that too much? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 10:29:13 PM While I agree with some of what's been said about her (Internet.Serious.Business, try-too-hard keepin'-it'real-ness) I don't see the need to label her a whore. Well an attentioon whore yes, but a regular one, no. She's got a nice face and decent body, and if she wants to make money off of that, who gives a shit?
If you're happy to do it, I can't see how softcore boobie-waving and a bit of a finger-twiddle on your own terms is worse than working at Wally-World, or McBurgers and absolutely hating your shitty job. As for the shitty, fucked-up childhood, it's a typical finger-point towards people who do porn, but shit, that happens to millions of people who don't do porn as well. I've heard that some non-porn people have been known to take drugs. :roll: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Velorath on December 08, 2005, 10:32:23 PM I'm still trying to decide who is worse now since people are starting to get really ANGRY. over the INTERNET. Us for the whole "lol internet" discussion where we chuckle amoung ourselves for stating the obvious (that she's a whore, and an angry one at that) and slapping eachother on the back because HOO BOY WE SURE PEGGED HER (despite however right we may be). Or her, for being an angry whore. She should just shrug, turn on the webcam, and make out with her ugly girlfriend some more. She's gotta be at least a subscription or two up with all this fun internet going on. I do give her one thing though, while she's around a 7/10 after the liberal use of photoshop and eyeliner, she knows good site design. Who's worse? The sycophants who post on her website I guess. I don't know, there's just something sad about a bunch of Internet geeks who are kissing a woman's ass on a porn site in the vain hope that she might one day let one of them fuck her, trying to act superior to other groups of Internet geeks. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 10:34:26 PM While I agree with some of what's been said about her (Internet.Serious.Business, try-too-hard keepin'-it'real-ness) I don't see the need to label her a whore. Well an attentioon whore yes, but a regular one, no. She's got a nice face and decent body, and if she wants to make money off of that, who gives a shit? She's making good money and isn't a wage slave to anyone because she capitalized on her natural assets, hey, good for her. Seriously, thumbs up there. Not many people can do that.And on the financial end she's the winner here, because this is nothing but free publicity and probably more subs. She's still an angry whore though. Who's worse? The sycophants who post on her website I guess. I don't know, there's just something sad about a bunch of Internet geeks who are kissing a woman's ass on a porn site in the vain hope that she might one day let one of them fuck her, trying to act superior to other groups of Internet geeks. Which puzzles me. I wonder if she let them in on the big secret that she's a lesbian.Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 10:40:01 PM Am I the only person here that hasn't seen what Raph looks like? Now I feel cheated. Wow, surely you jest. But in case you're serious, http://www.raphkoster.com. See him play the guitar! Dead serious. I mean aside from his book and the drawings and all. I don't really pay attention. Aww he does have an adorable teddy bearish quality about him. You just want to pinch his cheeks! (Face, people.) Now that someone has gone about linking us to resentful-cam-girl01 maybe we will even get a little cross contamination. She'll come here and yell at us all. It will be great fun and much sadness. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 10:42:41 PM It would certainly be some good internet, that's for sure.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 10:55:17 PM I just want to know what the difference is between shaking tits for a promotion and shaking your tits on teh intarweb for a...promotion? Really though, I find the whole situation baffling and private. Which makes it more fun to talk about! She's like her own tabloid!
(http://www.westernstage.org/BatBoy/images/BBpic_bw.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 10:56:50 PM I don't recall seeing that shot of her girlfriend on the website.
:rimshot: I'll be here all night folks, be sure to try the veal. I say we turn this thread into a contest to see how uncomfortable we can make Raph for having posted in it. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 11:03:07 PM She's still an angry whore though. See, I don't see which bit makes her a whore. She apparently only fucks her girlfriend on the website, and the rest of the time it looks like she just squeezes her boobies together and shakes her rump. Which is pretty much like a stripper. A whore is generally taken to be a woman who fucks anyone who moves/is super easy (as opposed to a "stud", which is apparently a good thing). Unless you've just got some conservative/puritan moral code that says anyone who is naked and seen by anyone outside their bedroom is automatically a whoresluthooker... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:04:31 PM I say we turn this thread into a contest to see how uncomfortable we can make Raph for having posted in it. He hired her? (http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/175/249/1600/orly.jpg) (http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/large/yarly-34109.jpg) Really, I have no clue. But those owls are funny shit and employment was the only thing I could come up with. Har. Edit: Azazel, whores fuck for money. Sluts fuck for free. Technically, selling your body for money makes you a whore. More semantics. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 11:12:24 PM She's still an angry whore though. See, I don't see which bit makes her a whore. She apparently only fucks her girlfriend on the website, and the rest of the time it looks like she just squeezes her boobies together and shakes her rump. Which is pretty much like a stripper. A whore is generally taken to be a woman who fucks anyone who moves/is super easy (as opposed to a "stud", which is apparently a good thing). Unless you've just got some conservative/puritan moral code that says anyone who is naked and seen by anyone outside their bedroom is automatically a whoresluthooker... I don't think she's a whore, personally. Or a slut for that matter. I mean really it's your body, do as you please with it while you have it and gravity isn't sucking it to the floor. I just feel bad she seems so....angsty and sad. It makes me weep. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 11:12:51 PM But she's not fucking YOU. Which is a semantic difference. Though it depends on who's interpretation/dictionary we're using if you want to get really pedantic. She's in California, right? They have specific laws there which say that making porn is not "prostitution", which is why pretty much the whole US porn industry is there.
Of course, if the argument sinks to arguing over exact word meanings, we're kinda missing the point. Which is that "whore" is a pretty derogatory term, much like "fag" or many others I don't need to go into here. I'm wondering why Fab has decided to choose that word. Whether he's just being a net.badass or looks down on people in any aspect of the skin trade or whether he has some moral qualms with it.. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:18:53 PM He chose the word whore because she sells her body, duderino. What I'm interested in is why you care so much. Whoring isn't illegal in vegas. Does that make prostitutes less prostitute....ty? How about this, she's an intarweb escort service. The closest thing you're going to get to the internet is selling a video of yourself and a shampoo bottle or whatever. I mean really, did he touch you in a bad place?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 11:20:07 PM But she's not fucking YOU. Which is a semantic difference. Though it depends on who's interpretation/dictionary we're using if you want to get really pedantic. She's in California, right? They have specific laws there which say that making porn is not "prostitution", which is why pretty much the whole US porn industry is there. Of course, if the argument sinks to arguing over exact word meanings, we're kinda missing the point. Which is that "whore" is a pretty derogatory term, much like "fag" or many others I don't need to go into here. I'm wondering why Fab has decided to choose that word. Whether he's just being a net.badass or looks down on people in any aspect of the skin trade or whether he has some moral qualms with it.. Fabricated..I'm in the porn business, don't you still love me? I am, after all, still cute for a stubby shortling. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 11:21:56 PM I'll remember to use more politically correct or funnier terms for people selling their bodies next time.
I hear "strumpet" is a funny word. It sure sounds funny. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:22:55 PM Poptart, You're not IN porn. Please, don't be sympathetic. Undeserved.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 11:24:25 PM I have to be sympathetic. It's good karma.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 11:25:28 PM Does this mean I can tell people I was in the porn business at one point because I worked at Movie Gallery for a while? Because that would kick ass.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:30:33 PM I have to be sympathetic. It's good karma. Internet karma? I guess Miss Boobies won't be getting much love from the gaming industry then. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 11:34:48 PM He chose the word whore because she sells her body, duderino. What I'm interested in is why you care so much. Whoring isn't illegal in vegas. Does that make prostitutes less prostitute....ty? How about this, she's an intarweb escort service. The closest thing you're going to get to the internet is selling a video of yourself and a shampoo bottle or whatever. I mean really, did he touch you in a bad place? See I disagree with you here. She's not selling her body, she's letting you look at it for money. You don't get to fuck her (though her blog and forums I'm sure are full of snivelling fanbois who think one day it might happen). Why I care so much is twofold: 1) I disagree with calling her a whore, because I don't see what she does as being a whore. 2) it's something to crap on about with you clowns on the intertron while I try to unfuck my installation of Nero on the other PC. Your last two sentences don't make sense to me.. is she selling the shampoo bottle? Or am I supposed to be using it to jerk off with it? Or both? Was it me or her who got touched? And by who? There's a difference between "selling" and "showing off", Fab. Else you may as well call runway models, Victoria's Secret models and half the untalented actresses in Hollywood "whores" as well. :heart: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:36:54 PM 1. Her website isn't free. She's selling her body. Making money off of it. Whatever.
2. Words are hard. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 08, 2005, 11:39:17 PM Your puritan founding fathers really fucked you guys up, didn't they?
A webcam is running while she fools around with her girlfriend. If for you that is the same thing as her spreading for some sweaty fat stranger then you have to straighten out your unpleasentometers. She is in porn business, but she is no whore. She chooses her sexual partner and what she does with him/her. The difference might not be that great for a horny male, but it makes all the difference to a woman, or so I was told. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 11:39:36 PM 1. Her website isn't free. She's selling her body. Making money off of it. Whatever. 2. Words are hard. 1. Like pro bodybuilders? Matey, she's showing pictures. Making money off of it, yes. Sucking you off for $100, nope. 2. Not as hard as I am. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 11:46:48 PM I will have to remember this particular topic for later use. People get really weird about the word whore.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 08, 2005, 11:47:09 PM He chose the word whore because she sells her body, duderino. What I'm interested in is why you care so much. Whoring isn't illegal in vegas. Does that make prostitutes less prostitute....ty? How about this, she's an intarweb escort service. The closest thing you're going to get to the internet is selling a video of yourself and a shampoo bottle or whatever. I mean really, did he touch you in a bad place? Technicality: Prostitution is illegal in Las Vegas. Very. They also have pretty restrictive laws concerning peelers/burlesque. Now elsewhere in Nevada there's a different PoV. Anyway, she's not a 'whore' in the sense you'd say 'wow i blew my rent on whisky and whores'. However, as others have articulated, she's a whore in the same way some celebreties are. She sells herself, not a seperate product she produces. But who cares. She's moderatley hot, she games, and she does porn. It's a slow news day story but sbout it. Oh and i too would like to read the manual, just for the record. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 08, 2005, 11:49:00 PM There is an enormous amount of pornography on the internet.
You know where else you can use the word whore? Camping whore. AWP WHORE. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 11:49:47 PM There is an enormous amount of pornography on the internet. But not a lot of whores I guess.Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 11:50:12 PM I have to be sympathetic. It's good karma. Internet karma? I guess Miss Boobies won't be getting much love from the gaming industry then. Are you kidding? Expect her to have her own game soon. Somewhere, if she keeps getting the attention she is getting, will get hired for something involving the game industry. And I don't want to read the manual. Besides, didn't someone a few years back post information specific to a CS Manual for one of the companies out there? Or am I thinking of another disgruntled worker that simply posted something on a forum. There are just so many of them out there. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 08, 2005, 11:52:28 PM Enormous isn't a big enough word. In fact, when i read her post/blog and saw the site my first thought was 'who the fuck is paying $15 a month for *this* porn?'. As a north american male i'm pretty familiar with porn and my internet activities concerning it are mostly related to the time i spend avoiding the trigantinormous amounts out there.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:53:22 PM Alright, fuckit. I'm getting tired of the semantics and I didn't want to go here:
Quote whore ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hôr, hr) n. A prostitute. A person considered sexually promiscuous. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations. To compromise one's principles for personal gain. Why? Because she's willing to shake her tits while dressed as a goth kiddie for direct cash but not willing to show a little cleavage for indirect cash - a raise. She's a goddamn whore. Now, there's nothing wrong with that. I had a subscription to suicidegirls.com for a while for christ's sake. But seriously, go back to my original problem. She complained about showing cleavage because she shouldn't "have to" and then goes (back?) into porn. Christfuck. Stop taking it so personally. And stop using the term whore so literally. Poptart: One word for you: Teledildonics. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 08, 2005, 11:53:51 PM I kid you not, I just spent the last 1/2 hour trying to find a picture of non-naked tits (that I didn't have to retouch) and all I could find was this:
(http://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/category/11-17-05/OSBRPZZZZZZ/ftr1.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 08, 2005, 11:54:41 PM Just do a safesearch with a celebrity name n00b. I've manually REMOVED the option for safesearch from google in my browsers. I don't even like the option. It's far too inviting.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 08, 2005, 11:55:40 PM Poptart: One word for you: Teledildonics. This is the best thread on the forum now.Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 11:56:40 PM Alright, fuckit. I'm getting tired of the semantics and I didn't want to go here: Quote whore ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hôr, hr) n. A prostitute. A person considered sexually promiscuous. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations. To compromise one's principles for personal gain. Why? Because she's willing to shake her tits while dressed as a goth kiddie for direct cash but not willing to show a little cleavage for indirect cash - a raise. She's a goddamn whore. Now, there's nothing wrong with that. I had a subscription to suicidegirls.com for a while for christ's sake. But seriously, go back to my original problem. She complained about showing cleavage because she shouldn't "have to" and then goes (back?) into porn. Christfuck. Stop taking it so personally. And stop using the term whore so literally. Poptart: One word for you: Teledildonics. Teledildonics makes me giggle. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 08, 2005, 11:57:14 PM Just do a safesearch with a celebrity name n00b. I've manually REMOVED the option for safesearch from google in my browsers. I don't even like the option. It's far too inviting. Safesearch? Just used that and still found naked tits. Edit: "When we can sustain a multi-sensory surround good enough for teledildonics, *then* we'll know we're getting somewhere." Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 11:58:28 PM I will have to remember this particular topic for later use. People get really weird about the word whore. Yeah, some people seem to take it a bit like kike, spic, wetback, wog, jew, gook, slope, chink, faggot, fag, poof, poofter, nigger, nigga, and so forth if it's used in a derogatory sense by people looking down on them, rather than as a "reclaimed" word. Feel free to edit any of those terms if they go against this forum's rules of good taste, etc. BTW, I'm at least of those terms I just typed, which I guess means it's ok for me to use those ones, but not the others. I think Tebonas nailed it, actually. Though she's definately an attention whore. But really, who truly gives a shit outside of her "it's a girl on the internet" fanbois? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 08, 2005, 11:59:09 PM Just do a safesearch with a celebrity name n00b. I've manually REMOVED the option for safesearch from google in my browsers. I don't even like the option. It's far too inviting. Safesearch? Just used that and still found naked tits. Why didn't you just go to Fredricksofhollywood.com? All the non naked breasticles you could want. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2005, 11:59:56 PM There is an enormous amount of pornography on the internet. You know where else you can use the word whore? Camping whore. AWP WHORE. Loot whore. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:00:26 AM There is an enormous amount of pornography on the internet. You know where else you can use the word whore? Camping whore. AWP WHORE. Loot whore. Cock whore. Edit: Found more breastesses! (http://www.washacadsci.org/flowers/daisies,%20a%20young%20girl%20with.pierre-auguste%20renoir.large.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:00:41 AM I will have to remember this particular topic for later use. People get really weird about the word whore. Yeah, some people seem to take it a bit like kike, spic, wetback, wog, jew, gook, slope, chink, faggot, fag, poof, poofter, nigger, nigga, and so forth if it's used in a derogatory sense by people looking down on them, rather than as a "reclaimed" word. Feel free to edit any of those terms if they go against this forum's rules of good taste, etc. BTW, I'm at least of those terms I just typed, which I guess means it's ok for me to use those ones, but not the others. Yes, it's just like that. IN INSANE-O WORLD WHERE UP IS DOWN, BLACK IS WHITE AND LASAGNA IS DOUGHNUTS. Quote Though she's definately an attention whore. But really, who truly gives a shit outside of her "it's a girl on the internet" fanbois? She does, or else we wouldn't be talking about it. I think she's more deserving of ridicule than the fragdolls or [PMS]. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 09, 2005, 12:04:30 AM I'm interested in seeing the word whore "reclaimed" by the downtrodden masses of whores everywhere.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:05:17 AM I'm interested in seeing the word whore "reclaimed" by the downtrodden masses of whores everywhere. here's a face for the stamps. (http://www.whatsupwiththat.info/photos/news/clbad.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 12:05:29 AM Alright, fuckit. I'm getting tired of the semantics and I didn't want to go here: Quote whore ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hôr, hr) n. A prostitute. A person considered sexually promiscuous. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations. To compromise one's principles for personal gain. Why? Because she's willing to shake her tits while dressed as a goth kiddie for direct cash but not willing to show a little cleavage for indirect cash - a raise. She's a goddamn whore. But dewd, a few posts up, according to you she was a whore because she's showing her titties on the interweb for money. Now she's a whore because you think she's compromised her principles. Make up your mind. She's not a prostitute. She's not directly having sexual relations with a client in exchange for payment, which is a legal definition of prostitution as well as your definition of whore just there. Damn, I can't keep up withthe posts here anymore. Aren't you lot mostly supposed to be asleep now? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:07:17 AM But dewd, a few posts up, according to you she was a whore because she's showing her titties on the interweb for money. Now she's a whore because you think she's compromised her principles. Make up your mind. Uh. In conclusion, she's a whore. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 09, 2005, 12:07:27 AM Sleep would be lovely.
But really, it's the thought of teledildonics that's keeping me awake at night. I can't stop the giggling. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:08:22 AM It's thursday. Showing your body for money isn't comprimised principles for personal gain? I'm sorry, I'm pretty sure I have the majority of earth on my side in saying that it is, no matter how much I love zee porn.
See, you don't want to call her a whore because you enjoy the shit. I have no problem calling her a whore and I enjoy the shit. Stop taking it so personally. But I would like to know where on the doll the webcam touched you. I think I just found a way to make millions. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:09:10 AM Where's my powerglove.
Edit: Found it. (http://www.gamersgraveyard.com/repository/nes/peripherals/images/powerglove.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:09:51 AM Where's my powerglove. Azazel's showing it to the SOE girl. "Hey, you want to see my...powerglove?" Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 09, 2005, 12:12:40 AM At this point I'm thinking we should send her a thank you letter for this topic.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:14:57 AM At this point I'm thinking we should send her a thank you letter for this topic. We could send her one of these: NSFW (http://www.slashdong.org/images/articles/freesex1/freesex.jpg) I'll pay shipping. Edit: lol slashdong.org Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:15:29 AM At this point I'm thinking we should send her a thank you letter for this topic. We could send her one of these: NSFW (http://www.slashdong.org/images/articles/freesex1/freesex.jpg) I'll pay shipping. You googled teledildonics you silly fucker! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 09, 2005, 12:16:17 AM See what happens when you throw no sleep in with teledildonics and web porn?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:16:28 AM Awesome.
Edit: Sweet merciful Christ, there's a lot of porn on the internet. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 09, 2005, 12:17:02 AM God, and that's the EXACT SAME MIDTOWER CASE I USE.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 09, 2005, 12:17:45 AM Now all you need is the attachment and the floppy disk.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:17:53 AM God, and that's the EXACT SAME MIDTOWER CASE I USE. Should we expect a review this weekend? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:18:14 AM God, and that's the EXACT SAME MIDTOWER CASE I USE. You foxy minx! I didn't know you ran slashdong. I thought I met Kyle at AGC! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 09, 2005, 12:20:26 AM God, and that's the EXACT SAME MIDTOWER CASE I USE. Should we expect a review this weekend? You foxy minx! I didn't know you ran slashdong. I thought I met Kyle at AGC! And here I thought I was careful enough to imply that the computer case itself the slashdong is embedded in on that picture is the same model of case I happen to own. WORDS ARE HARDTitle: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 12:20:44 AM Shit, I'm at work and don't dare googling the stuff you do. 7 hours to go till I can.
I'm definitely a whore. i'm compromising my principles of free information flow (web searches) for personal gain. Namely my next paycheck. DAMN Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:22:14 AM Like I said, being a whore isn't something I have a problem with.
Being a whore and blaming a whore for being a whore is something else entirely. Hypocritical whore. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:23:33 AM Hippowhore.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 12:24:28 AM I kid you not, I just spent the last 1/2 hour trying to find a picture of non-naked tits (that I didn't have to retouch) and all I could find was this: (http://www2.victoriassecret.com/images/category/11-17-05/OSBRPZZZZZZ/ftr1.jpg) Hm.. now this chick seems to be using her body rather than any talent or skills here. And I'm betting she didn't do it for free. WHORE!! (or do I need to whack off to it for it to count?) schild, well, obviously she does. This shitstorm in a teacup is probably making her year, despite the fact that most all of us will have forgotten about it by this time next week. I'm sure it's doing wonders for her site's hits, and what with the gaming-geek factor of the people reading about this shit combined with her personal forumy bloggy touch and net.geek.girl persona is probably translating to $16.95 a month more than a few times over. Guys on the internet (especially single ones, but not exclusively so) who can talk to the owner of the titties that they're whacking off to, tend to make extreme fanbois. Throw in the fact that she worked at SOE FTW. Kinda like porn performer Asia Carerra being a UT player. And yeah Fab, I know (through the intarweb) some people that proudly call themselves whores. I think they're more than a little silly to do so, but hey, I'm not the world's arbiter of taste, good or otherwise. later posts: schild: saying that someone showing their titties for personal gain = comprimised principles for personal gain doesn't work because, odd as it may be, each person has their own principles. Hers are obviously different to yours. Just like mine are different to both of yours. You might nit agree with them, but you don't get to tell the world what it's personal morals and principles are, see? Me enjoying porn has nothing to do with enjoying it or now (and I do) it's because the term is so derogatory. I like the actor Samuel L Jackson, but I don't say "I like that nigger". As for personally, I'm just arguing with people on the internet, mate. Most of the posters here are smarter than the usual fuckwad on net.forums, which just makes the argument more fun. Now I'm not trolling, and I do legitimately disagree with describing whateverhernameis as a whore, but I'm enjoying the posting. Much :heart: for that PC case though. But you'll have to be the one to send her the thankyou note. My powerglove stopped working just now as it got a bit ..wet on the inside. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 12:25:01 AM I admit I went for the literal definition of whore in this thread at first. Context is important in translations if you are a non native speaker. In your definition of whore, everybody is a whore anyway. So why should anybody care.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 12:27:50 AM It's thursday. Huh? Don't you guys work on Fridays or sammat? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:29:09 AM Whores have Friday off.
Edit for sensitivity. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:31:49 AM Azazel obviously has some personal bad experience to be trying this hard.
That said, Azazel, stop reaching. Whore stopped being derogatory in 1994. Now, cunt, that's a derogatory thing to call a woman. Also clambake and spunkbucket - but whore? No. Are you hiding something? I don't know a single guy who really knows any girl born after 1975 who would be as offended as you by the word whore. PARTICULARLY girls who dwell in netspaces. My grandparents would be offended, my mother would be offended, but they haven't been desensitized by the intarweb. And if this girl is offended? Then she's a stupid and naive as well. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:36:07 AM Clambake?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 12:36:57 AM Cultural differences? Around here "Hure"(=Whore) still gets women riled up and angry quite good. Maybe in Australia as well?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 12:38:46 AM Azazel obviously has some personal bad experience to be trying this hard. That said, Azazel, stop reaching. Whore stopped being derogatory in 1994. Now, cunt, that's a derogatory thing to call a woman. Also clambake and spunkbucket - but whore? No. Are you hiding something? I don't know a single guy who really knows any girl born after 1975 who would be as offended as you by the word whore. PARTICULARLY girls who dwell in netspaces. My grandparents would be offended, my mother would be offended, but they haven't been desensitized by the intarweb. And if this girl is offended? Then she's a stupid and naive as well. Nah, I have bad experiences in my life, but not with this particular word, or any words really.. I'm not sure what she thinks, you'll have to ask her. GJ on trying to personalise the argument as you flipflopped around on why you were calling her a whore/how you were trying to define it though. You really have no idea how offended or not I am by the word though mate, I'm as faceless as you are. For the record though, I personally think that it's disrespectful and dumb, but in a different way to, say, you or I calling one another cockjockeys. As usual, I think Tebonas also has a good handle on it. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:40:29 AM Clambake? This is not a place to talk about tarter sauce. I'm just not going there. Obscure sexual slurs just isn't my bag. Quote Cultural differences? Around here "Hure"(=Whore) still gets women riled up and angry quite good. Maybe in Australia as well? Not in America. Not since MTV's Grind. Quote More azazel... Dude, I've said 50 times I have no problem with it and I'm not using it offensively. You, however, are obviously tiffed by the word. I'm asking why. If you don't want to talk about it, that's cool. But understand right now, that dude, sometimes a whore doesn't need a dick in her to be a whore. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:44:50 AM You really have no idea how offended or not I am by the word though mate, I'm as faceless as you are. But I do have an idea. You're still talking about it. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:51:53 AM (http://glitterrock.org/jeocaps16/whatisthedifferencecorrectfor500.jpg)
Just felt appropriate. Title: ~ Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 12:52:26 AM Dude, I've said 50 times I have no problem with it and I'm not using it offensively. You, however, are obviously tiffed by the word. I'm asking why. If you don't want to talk about it, that's cool. But understand right now, that dude, sometimes a whore doesn't need a dick in her to be a whore. Maaaate. I told you that I think the word is disrespectful and stupid. Admittedly, using it as part of slinging generalised shit to faeless people on the internet isn't so bad, but MTV's grind or not, I think you'll get slightly more than a "meh" reaction if you use it in the real world. You work at EB or some other software store, right? Try usinmg it to your female customers in an inoffensive tone. "How may I help you, whore?" if you'd like to test it's inoffensiveness. :roll: And your last sentence. ..so after all that work you did with semantics and quoting dictionary.com or whereever you googled that definition from, after having all your arguments beaten, (SHE COMPROMISED MY PRINCIPLES!!~) you've just decided to just go back to the most base argument of all, with some "you're taking this way to personally, d00d" throw in.. So sad. :heartbreak: (you need a crying smiley) I'm still talking about it since I'm clearing space off this machine across the network and I can't do anything more productive like play WoW or BF2 or SWBF2 for a bit. On the other hand, you're still bullshitting on as much as I am... ..does this mean you really care? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 12:55:40 AM Are you guys gonna kiss?
Title: Re: ~ Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 12:57:04 AM Maaaate. I told you that I think the word is disrespectful and stupid. Admittedly, using it as part of slinging generalised shit to faeless people on the internet isn't so bad, but MTV's grind or not, I think you'll get slightly more than a "meh" reaction if you use it in the real world. You work at EB or some other software store, right? Try usinmg it to your female customers in an inoffensive tone. "How may I help you, whore?" if you'd like to test it's inoffensiveness. :roll: Are we in an EB? Is this not the internet? Quote And your last sentence. ..so after all that work you did with semantics and quoting dictionary.com or whereever you googled that definition from, after having all your arguments beaten, (SHE COMPROMISED MY PRINCIPLES!!~) you've just decided to just go back to the most base argument of all, with some "you're taking this way to personally, d00d" throw in.. So sad. :heartbreak: (you need a crying smiley) The definition was all I needed. You're still going. She didn't comprimise my principles. She comprimised HER principles. She didn't want to shake tits for a job she took demotions for but she'll shake tits for namesless people on the net. Like I said, words are hard. She couldn't comprimise my principles if she did a broadway play involving a man dressed as Gandhi fucking her in the ass while she was dressed up as Hitler and having someone in the crowd dressed up as Pol Pot handing out propaganda papers. Quote I'm still talking about it since I'm clearing space off this machine across the network and I can't do anything more productive like play WoW or BF2 or SWBF2 for a bit. On the other hand, you're still bullshitting on as much as I am... ..does this mean you really care? I really, really do. This is the closest thing to drama we get in the industry. And trust me when I say this, we take what we can get. Are you her girlfriend? SHE'S NOT PAYING YOU WELL, IS SHE? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 01:02:25 AM Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Samwise on December 09, 2005, 01:02:37 AM Seems more appropriate to a thread devoted to a camgirl:
(http://www.glitterrock.org/jeocaps16/alexoffscreenthanksguysjustfeedstraightlines.jpg) I couldn't find the "Horsemen" one. :-( And now... kittens! (http://www.forumspile.com/Kittens/Kitten_066.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 01:07:37 AM The evil strangling of mother kittens by their offspring has to stop!
Poor mother kittens! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 01:08:28 AM (http://rimba.co.uk/store/images/apollo/images/200x200/590131.jpg)
Just putting that out there. Title: Re: ~ Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 01:21:05 AM Are we in an EB? Is this not the internet? Oh sorry, I thought you were explaining to me how the word hasn't been offensive since 1994. My bad. Quote The definition was all I needed. You're still going. She didn't comprimise my principles. She comprimised HER principles. She didn't want to shake tits for a job she took demotions for but she'll shake tits for namesless people on the net. Like I said, words are hard. She couldn't comprimise my principles if she did a broadway play involving a man dressed as Gandhi fucking her in the ass while she was dressed up as Hitler and having someone in the crowd dressed up as Pol Pot handing out propaganda papers. No, you were going on about your opinion being gospel and the rest of the world agreeing with you. See? Quote Showing your body for money isn't comprimised principles for personal gain? I'm sorry, I'm pretty sure I have the majority of earth on my side in saying that it is, no matter how much I love zee porn. Like I told you before, people's principles are their own. Just because you think that A and B are the same doesn't mean that everyone else does. Because you are not the arbiter of anyone else's morals. See how that works? Seriously mate, you keep changing your argument and reasoning every third post or so, and throwing in "this is personal to you, isn't it?" every other post doesn't help your argument one bit. Straw men are lovely this time of year though, so I've heard. Quote I really, really do. This is the closest thing to drama we get in the industry. And trust me when I say this, we take what we can get. Are you her girlfriend? SHE'S NOT PAYING YOU WELL, IS SHE? Yes, I am really her girlfriend, and no, she's not giving me enough money or dildo-satisfaction, so I'll be taking my powerglove and the PC case of lurve and leaving in the night. As for really caring, hey I'm as entertained as you are, I'm sure. But it doesn't mean I truly care. You know as well as I do that she'll be pretty much forgotten in a week, as I said before. I'll grant you that's no reason not to watch the drama as it unfolds. Were you the one who posted the f13 link to her boards? *kiss* Oh, cute kittens, and nice catgirl, too. http://www.catwoman-copycat.net/home.htm Title: Re: ~ Post by: Evil Elvis on December 09, 2005, 01:22:27 AM The definition was all I needed. You're still going. She didn't comprimise my principles. She comprimised HER principles. She didn't want to shake tits for a job she took demotions for but she'll shake tits for namesless people on the net. Like I said, words are hard. She couldn't comprimise my principles if she did a broadway play involving a man dressed as Gandhi fucking her in the ass while she was dressed up as Hitler and having someone in the crowd dressed up as Pol Pot handing out propaganda papers. Whore she may be, you're seriously grasping at straws on this whole hypocrisy thing. Especially when you've already stated in this thread you felt her claims - if valid - were unacceptable in the workplace. Just because she's willing to do something of her own volition doesn't mean she's not entitled to the same basic rights as the rest of us, or that she doesn't have the right to be offended. Stop being difficult. Now, more teledildonics plz. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 01:26:24 AM But difficult is what schild does. There's many threads here attesting to that.
anyway, my shitty maintenence is done with, so I'm going to go blow shit up and then maybe whack some foozles. I'll catch up with the fun and games later on. See if you can find any good pix of that drow Realdoll the EQ freak ordered a couple of years ago, please. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 01:30:29 AM I'm definately in bizarro world here if I'm [the only one] seeing a difference in flaunting your boobs at the workplace or flaunting them on the internet. I mean seriously, she apparently has had the webspace and has been around for a while. So whoever wanted to at her workplace could have probably found nude pics of her without much effort. Which means she might as well have been flaunting her boobs. Which means she wasn't getting promotions because she sucked at customer service. Which is pretty obvious given the blog posts. That's all I was getting at.... at first.
Then I defended Fabricated for stating the obvious. And some people got all in a tizzy. I'll go to sensitivity training before I decide to put sand in some users' manginas next time. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Triforcer on December 09, 2005, 02:08:32 AM Then I defended Fabricated for stating the obvious. And some people got all in a tizzy. I'll go to sensitivity training before I decide to put sand in some users' manginas next time. You've forgotten that while people here are for the most part normal and will rightfully laugh when some schmoe in Mississippi sandblasts his genitals, we collectively have specific weak spots that our cutting and trenchant wits would otherwise savage. The following, in the entire LTM Diaspora, cannot be criticized: 1) Internet dating. 2) Internet MMO dating. 3) 40 year old man dressing up as 15 year old Japanese girls. 4) 15 year old boys having sex with 40 year old women. 5) Apparently this, for some reason. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 02:10:20 AM I always forget about number five.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 09, 2005, 03:50:33 AM Hmmm. I come back and there's a seven page thread. Strangely arguing about a word that I was first to use in the thread. And yet no-one's called me on it.
It's almost like people like to bash the 'Puritanical Americans', but no-one wants to touch the 'Angry Scotsmen'. Fair enough. I ain't gonna dance back and forth on this one. I'm not even inclined to argue it : She's a whore. If your only definition of being a whore is someone who takes a Penis and puts it in their Vagina shortly before putting the Penis's currency into the Vagina's Bank Account, then you are a complete and utter fucking knob. In so many ways is this woman a whore. Attention whore, link whore, cash whore, principle whore. She's a fucking, fucking whore. Don't ever make me agree even remotely with Schild again. It's upsetting. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 04:10:24 AM You are as wrong as Schild is, but less entertaining when poked with a stick.
In a thread about sexuality and porn, OF COURSE the first applied definition of whore is the literal one, not the other one. But the problem with Schilds opinion is not the usage of the word whore. His problem is that he thinks there is no difference between women who market their body on their own and women that are forced (or think to be forced) to market their body to achieve things on an unrelated field. This was your opinion as well? Sorry, missed that. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 09, 2005, 04:16:11 AM Mate, she's even posted on that damn blog of hers that 'The Increased Traffic to My Website is a Bonus tho !'
Lol. wtf. !!!!oneone. Yes, I imagine it is a bonus. A totally unexpected bonus I'm sure. A totally unplanned and unexpected bonus. A totally unplanned and unexpected and welcome because your car is broke down and you need a new one bonus. A totally..... Nope, can't do it anymore. Whore. kthx. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Numtini on December 09, 2005, 04:28:22 AM She's a whore? No, she stopped working at SOE and now runs her own porn site. She used to be a whore, now she's a businesswoman.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 04:32:38 AM In a thread about sexuality and porn, OF COURSE the first applied definition of whore is the literal one, not the other one. But the problem with Schilds opinion is not the usage of the word whore. His problem is that he thinks there is no difference between women who market their body on their own and women that are forced (or think to be forced) to market their body to achieve things on an unrelated field. ONCE AGAIN, just before I pass out, I'll repeat myself. I did not say that SHE was force to flaunt at SOE. I did not say that she THOUGHT she should be forced. I'm saying she obviously wasn't getting promoted based on her performance. Which, given the writing on her pretty little blog, was trashy - but rather that someone else flaunted and god the raise. My point being that if this was the sad truth of it, she should have stood up for women everywhere. Instead she posted a whiny little bit on her website talking about problems and SOE, making allegations, and how porn is a better fit. I can't believe I had to type that for the fourth or fifth time. Next time I'm just quoting myself from 7 pages ago. Now, there is a difference between women that market their body on their own and people that are forced. But since we're talking about a hypothetical situation at the moment since I don't believe Ms. Wacko, we'll just pretend it all played out. Someone who's willing to market her body on her own website is pissed at another girl who was willing to flash a little cleavage around the office to get ahead. Odds are the second girl wasn't forced and understood the playing field. If my competition was a girl who did porn I'd certainly up the ante. Sure, it's not right. But at the end of the day - they're both whores. Now what's the problem here? Do I stutter? Are the sentences all fragmented and full of spelling errors? Or is it not clear to you that both of these girls are insane even though the second girl was probably a better fit for the job (promotions) because she was willing to do what the brass said? Retention is probably, at least, 30% consumer relations. This girl, our goth friend, bites ass at it. And look at her goddamn picture on the website. You think people had to see her naked at SOE's office? Hell no, they can imagine it and look up pictures. I would seriously consider putting real money on a court case if something ever arose on it. "The case of the sexually discriminated against amateur porn starlet vs. SOE." Oh yes, it would be an epic battle. Sony could get a public defender for it and come off clean as a whistle. No judge in his right mind would buy her brand of bullshit. Little miss damaged goods just wants to blame everyone but herself. Now, someone can call me a shallow prick. But I'm simply not going to bend for this "victim." Of course, I could be wrong, but it's not likely. Our girl here seems to be all about self-empowerment, hence the passing of the buck. If she had a case, it would have been all over the gamingsphere. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Merusk on December 09, 2005, 04:35:55 AM My god you people were bored last night.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 09, 2005, 04:38:14 AM My god you people were bored last night. I caught up on Veronica Mars, Dead Like Me (again) and a wee bit of Magic the Gathering Online. I also :nda: and :nintendo:. But in between it all this was the most far fetched thread that kept me entertained today. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 04:49:04 AM The fact that she thinks she would have to show her boobies to get a promotion in a Customer Service job makes her at worst deluded.
And, in the real world if the other girl really would have gotten ahead soley by flashing a little cleavage that would be terrible wrong. Lawsuit wrong. Bosses fired because of it wrong. Yes, girls get ahead by using their female guiles. If it is suspected they are branded office slut. If it can be proven by somebody who was in line for the promotion you have your lawsuit. In no possible way is that "understanding the playing field". If that would be the playing field at Sony, the lawyers would have a field day. I don't care for this girl one iota. She probably is one of these whiny bitches (not in the female dog sense) with a sense of entitlement blown out of proportion. I just don't find an openly sexually charged workspace ok just because she is a whiny bitch. Working day between two free days. Nobody calls, nothing to do. You can't even imagine how bored I am...l Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 09, 2005, 04:52:52 AM I can.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 04:54:30 AM Yes, I presume after this thread you can.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Soukyan on December 09, 2005, 05:02:54 AM My god you people were bored last night. I'll say they were. This thread died on the first page amd it's up to ... 7? *boggle* Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 09, 2005, 05:03:32 AM But the problem with Schilds opinion is not the usage of the word whore. His problem is that he thinks there is no difference between women who market their body on their own and women that are forced (or think to be forced) to market their body to achieve things on an unrelated field. This was your opinion as well? Sorry, missed that. You stealth edited this in. If I understand you correctly, this is not my opinion as well. My opinion differs. Assuming that you have understood his opinion. Of course, my opinion believes that this silly cunt wasn't forced to do any such thing, nor was her colleague who got promoted forced to do any such thing. I think she's an incredible attention whore with a fucking jealous streak a mile wide because Mommy and Daddy didn't fucking want her. I think she should go and fucking kill herself and stop blaming those around her for her own fucking shortcomings. See why it's best not to get involved ? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 09, 2005, 05:08:05 AM I think of her as you do. And I don't say that just because I can go home in under half an hour.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: 5150 on December 09, 2005, 05:33:35 AM I honestly cannot believe how much attention the throwaway remark about the 65 page community relations policies manual has gotten. :P I'm probably not going to make myself popular [with Raph] but it would seem that, as far as SWG goes, no one at SOE read the version of the manual Raph described........ Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 05:41:10 AM Fuck, even I'll agree with Ironwood on that one...
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Calantus on December 09, 2005, 05:47:24 AM Oh comeon... she a goth chic with a troubled past made up of druggo parents, abuse, rejection, leaving home early, personal drug abuse, and black makeup. She runs a porn/webcame/whateverthefuck site where she flashes boobies while modeling B&D outfits. She then complains about someone being promoted above her for supposedly flashing their tatas, and how it cannot possibly be because she is a crazy goth psycho bitch who most probably does not get on well with the higherups (she thinks wolves are better than people my she must love and get along with everyone). She then throws a tantrum and accusations while whoring it all out to get attention and site visitors.
Pfft. We've all heard it before I'm sure. It's like she printed it from a textbook. How did this hit 7 pages again? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 09, 2005, 05:48:15 AM This entire thread has a big fat hairy ass.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Dren on December 09, 2005, 05:51:14 AM This entire thread has a big fat hairy ass. That jiggles... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 09, 2005, 06:07:24 AM Ahh wake up..
Have you first cup of hot chocolate.. And read the morning F13's. What more could a girl want? This entire thread has probably served some sadistic purpose in her. She is, after all, Malice. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Soln on December 09, 2005, 06:22:16 AM "Ho-ho-ho"
(http://www.blueharvest.net/images/xmas/xmasyoda.jpg) Edit: kitten add (http://www.chris-franklin.co.uk/news/december/912/friends/kitten.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Calantus on December 09, 2005, 06:35:45 AM Sheep the add.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 07:02:58 AM Pfft. We've all heard it before I'm sure. It's like she printed it from a textbook. How did this hit 7 pages again? Well, for the last few pages, I had crap I had to do with my gaming computer so I couldn't blow pretend monsters up, and I was bored. schild.. well, he was up late watching tv, I think, and also obviously just as bored. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 09, 2005, 07:27:59 AM I'm a married woman. Of course I wouldn't "hit it". But he does have kind eyes and a sweet smile and I'm sure he gets offers from people wanting to hit him all the time. He seems very hugable. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: cevik on December 09, 2005, 07:38:53 AM I'm a married woman. Of course I wouldn't "hit it". But he does have kind eyes and a sweet smile and I'm sure he gets offers from people wanting to hit him all the time. He seems very hugable. Combined with your avatar, this is my favorite post of all time. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 09, 2005, 07:59:53 AM His avatar scares me. It's some actor, right? It's not him, is it?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 08:15:23 AM HOW THE HOLY MONKEY FUCK DID THIS IDIOTIC THREAD GET TO BE SEVEN FUCKING PAGES?!??!!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!?!?!?!?
And since I'm catching up from page 4 of the Retardathon central: - btw, the CRM for a game should be considered a lead on the team Yes. They should also be without soul when you hire them, because the job will take whatever fractured pieces of humanity they have left and grind it up into little jagged bits that even a dog wouldn't swallw. CRM's are the trudging damned. Quote btw, yes, you need to run forums. All our games will have forums henceforth. Here's the stock policies on bannings, etc. No, I'll have to disagree here. Forums only cause no-life geeks to feel entitled to communication with the devs. Their self-importance does not need anymore inflation than it already had. That's what guilds are for. Fuck forums in their tiny little earhole. Pick correspondents out of people you learn you can trust and tell the rest to fuck off to the Vault. See why I'd never make a good CRM? Or maybe I'd make a great one, because the Internet has already removed what little parts of my soul were left after working in marketing. Quote - here's some advice on handling problems: always be honest, be prompt, don't overpromise, etc etc. /rimshot When is SOE going to implement this policy? /rimshot :rimshot: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 08:24:14 AM Your puritan founding fathers really fucked you guys up, didn't they? Yes, unfortunately they did. Quote A webcam is running while she fools around with her girlfriend. If for you that is the same thing as her spreading for some sweaty fat stranger then you have to straighten out your unpleasentometers. She is in porn business, but she is no whore. She chooses her sexual partner and what she does with him/her. The difference might not be that great for a horny male, but it makes all the difference to a woman, or so I was told. What you said. She's selling pictures of her body, not her body. That's not whoring. It's modeling. It is pr0n. There's nothing wrong with pr0n. Being in the pr0n industry doesn't make you a whore, having guys pay you money so they can fuck you, that makes you a whore. She sells masturbatory stimulation. That's a good thing (TM). Comma goddamnit. I think if everyone masturbated at least 50% more than they currently do, we'd all be a much happier people. And more tired. And hungry. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 09, 2005, 08:32:22 AM She's a whore? No, she stopped working at SOE and now runs her own porn site. She used to be a whore, now she's a businesswoman. Numtini wins this thread. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 09, 2005, 08:37:53 AM It's 10:30 am. Did you HAVE to put such huge RED font? I mean really. Wasn't I picked on for the very same thing? Tsk Tsk.
We are now on page 8 and I say Numtini hasn't won. We need somoene to start keeping score. Any takers? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 08:40:42 AM I will agree with schild on one thing. She's a huge fucking hypocrite.
Why? Because she whines and complains that the reason she didn't get promoted was because another female in the offcie jiggled her titties at the bosses and she didn't. Yet, she makes money now (and then apparently) by jiggling her titties on a web site for complete strangers. Does no one see that as a hypocritical contradiction? Ok, good others do. She's not a whore whore. She's an attention whore, that's obvious. But not a whore whore. The winner of this thread? Isn't it obvious? It's the former SOE employee turned pr0n goddess who apparently is going to get more subscriptions out of all this attention. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 09, 2005, 08:43:27 AM This thread has surpassed my wildest dreams. The sexual harassment clusterfuck, our favorite red-named celeb making an appearance, the YA RLY owl, Haem's giant red text, cross-linkage, lots of furious anger about nothing fueled by a Sir Bruce style semantic argument, and a really nice rack.
This thread pretty much sums up the entire internet. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Merusk on December 09, 2005, 08:45:52 AM This thread pretty much sums up the entire internet. I can think of a few key things missing from it still. D Smrt, Furries, and mangina. It's damn close though. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 08:46:30 AM This thread pretty much sums up the entire internet. I can think of a few key things missing from it still. D Smrt, Furries, and mangina. It's damn close though. Don't give them anymore fucking ideas. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Margalis on December 09, 2005, 08:49:23 AM I will agree with schild on one thing. She's a huge fucking hypocrite. Why? Because she whines and complains that the reason she didn't get promoted was because another female in the offcie jiggled her titties at the bosses and she didn't. Yet, she makes money now (and then apparently) by jiggling her titties on a web site for complete strangers. You guys just don't get it. In porn, jiggling your tits is a job requirement. It's what you are SUPPOSED to be judged on. Working at SOE there is a different set of job criteria. If you are really good at cleaning up elephant shit that matters a lot if you work in a zoo. Does it matter if you are an Opera singer? No. You are supposed to be judged based on what you bring to the table relevant to the job. The context matters. This is such a simple context, I can't believe people don't get it. Would you hire a CEO because he was good at soccer? Or choose a soccer player for the US Olypmic team because he was good at hockey? Her point is not just that the other girls wiggled her tits - her point is that wiggling her tits is not supposed to have anything to do with the job. It's not a good reason to be promoted in a company environment. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Dren on December 09, 2005, 09:10:05 AM Should jigglies be required for a better position in an office that does not need employees with jigglies to function?
No Did the women in question display jigglies and get preferencial treatment at said office? Source untrustworthy, lack of information from all parties. It will never be settled without a doubt. Am I missing anything? Oh to the question of firing her in the first place: If I bring in a print out of other women's jigglies for them to be signed out of adoration, is that wrong? Is it? Or is pornography banned from the office? Are pornographers banned as well? Should I have her sign it after work someplace else? Is it any different then? At what point in the day do I acceptably go from coworker or boss to fan? If she didn't have a site, but allowed coworkers to view her body after work for money, should she have kept her job then? How is having a site to do the same thing any different? As a manager, I'd have fired her too. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 09, 2005, 09:11:01 AM You know, when I said I was more interested in Raph's 65 page manual than what a net porn star says, I mean it. :sad_panda:
What in the world got into everyone last night anyway? Holy crap. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 09:12:25 AM No, it isn't SUPPOSED to have anything to do with her job. But guess what? People aren't fucking robots. And people, ESPECIALLY MEN, will respond to positive behaviour towards them much better than they do to neutral or negative behaviour.
I am guilty of it myself. Here's an example of what I mean. Say I work the counter in retail. 3 customers approach me for service. A is bouncy, blonde, has big tits and is boisterous, and whether purposeful or not, is flirty. Chick B is a woman with little or no emotion evident, a no-nonesense business as usual type of person. She isn't cold, but she isn't warm either, she's just neutral. Finally, Chick C is a goth chick who is semi-attractive, but really cold, snotty or otherwise not engaging as a person. Without being rude, even her body language tells me she could give two shits what I thought or what service I render to her. Guess what? Chick A is going to get better service from me than either B or C, simply by the way she responded to me. Now, this won't be true all the time, but 90% of the time, yeah, A's going to get my best, followed by B then C. Is that right? No, but it's reality. There's no sexual discrimination there. I'm just responding as a human being. You get more flies with honey is a cliche because it's true a lot of the time. The reason we mention her hypocrisy in this regard is because she chose to whine about one of her co-workers getting a raise for flirting (and since all we've heard her say is something that sounds like flirting instead of actual sexual favors), something she refused to do. But then she does something that essentially involves flirting for money. One of these things is EXACTLY like the other. If someone was asking her to blow him for a promotion, that would be wrong. But if someone is just rewarding friendliness, that may not be right, but it isn't wrong, and it should be expected. Because that's how humans are. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Alkiera on December 09, 2005, 09:13:15 AM Should jigglies be required for a better position in an office that does not need employees with jigglies to function? No Did the women in question display jigglies and get preferencial treatment at said office? Source untrustworthy, lack of information from all parties. It will never be settled without a doubt. Am I missing anything? Oh to the question of firing her in the first place: If I bring in a print out of other women's jigglies for them to be signed out of adoration, is that wrong? Is it? Or is pornography banned from the office? Are pornographers banned as well? Should I have her sign it after work someplace else? Is it any different then? At what point in the day do I acceptably go from coworker or boss to fan? If she didn't have a site, but allowed coworkers to view her body after work for money, should she have kept her job then? How is having a site to do the same thing any different? As a manager, I'd have fired her too. Except, she wasn't fired, she quit. She gave like a month's notice, and then stopped showing up for work. That is not getting fired. She decided she'd had it with the work environment at SOE, and her side job(running a porn site) became her primary job. Again, just to repeat, there was NO firing. Alkiera Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Dren on December 09, 2005, 09:15:24 AM I'd have fired her anyway. :-D
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Hoax on December 09, 2005, 09:16:16 AM After Sherlock Holmsing all the facts.. I've decided these are the events that led to what we have now.
-She's doing the pr0n site, everyone at her office knows about. -Therefore anything her boss (who must be a douche, this IS sony) says to her gets turned into innuendo by her "everything is about meeee" brain. -So she's probably the same annoying, classless, stupid (insulting geeks on your website when your doing soft goth pr0n for $15/mo?) attention whore we have all now been introduced to. -Some other babe shows up at the office, has a great personality, or just isn't an angry closet goth lesbo (nicer tits even who knows), and gets a promotion -Psycho-whore flips out, and due to the drugs/abusive parents/I do pr0n/general skewed world-view thing assumes that other babe must have flashed boobies!!! -She quits in a rage, then realizes she has like 17 subs for her stupid goth pr0n website, so she blogs some shit, and watches the sub numbers rise... In the end she wins, because there is no such thing as bad publicity. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 09:18:35 AM In the end she wins, because there is no such thing as bad publicity. In other words, her life is the MMOG release cycle. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: shiznitz on December 09, 2005, 09:22:11 AM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/) With that I think the thread can die. :-D NSFW fucker. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Rasix on December 09, 2005, 09:22:37 AM Haem, it may be fucked up, but it's still not hypocrisy. Hate to bring it down to a semantic argument, but it is. Calling someone a hypocrite is a pretty serious thing to do and is just not applicable in this case. She knew where to shake her tits for cash and where that is considered part of the job. She knew in her SOE job, this should not effect how her job performance is rated and how promotions are given. Perhaps she was using the term "shake her tits" to refer to the overall demeanor of the other individual, but we can't know this based on what is said.
Sorry, the hypocrite claim just doesn't fly here. It's like Alanis Morisette's song "Ironic". Rain on your wedding day isn't ironic, it's just shitty. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Merusk on December 09, 2005, 09:31:54 AM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/) With that I think the thread can die. :-D NSFW fucker. Eh? I didn't pay attention, just went to the LJ site rather than the other because the other was most definatly not. However, the whole thread's about porn and her porn site, I have no idea why you thought it'd be safe in the first place. If I bring in a print out of other women's jigglies for them to be signed out of adoration, is that wrong? Is it? Or is pornography banned from the office? Are pornographers banned as well? Should I have her sign it after work someplace else? Is it any different then? At what point in the day do I acceptably go from coworker or boss to fan? You never move from 'boss' to 'other' as long as that person works under you. Examples of successful suits on the part of the plantiff that were given in the previous harassment & managers seminar I was at included: A party at being held at an employee's house and someone put on some porn. One of the coworkers made a comment about how one of the actresses looked like one of the female coworkers while she was there. A manager was present as well, and laughed along. The manager was successfuly sued for creating a hostile working environment. Whoopsie. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 09, 2005, 09:32:20 AM How about whiny? Two-faced? Disingenuous?
She doesn't want to shake her tits for more money, so she goes and shakes her tits for more money. Yes, it's inappropriate at one and required at the other. That doesn't keep it from sounding silly that she would frown on someone else "shaking their moneymaker" for more attention at one place, then go and shake her moneymaker at another place. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 09, 2005, 09:34:48 AM MY THREAD WANTS TO LIIIIIIVE!!
I feel like Richard Pryor in Superman II. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Dren on December 09, 2005, 09:46:06 AM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/) With that I think the thread can die. :-D NSFW fucker. Eh? I didn't pay attention, just went to the LJ site rather than the other because the other was most definatly not. However, the whole thread's about porn and her porn site, I have no idea why you thought it'd be safe in the first place. If I bring in a print out of other women's jigglies for them to be signed out of adoration, is that wrong? Is it? Or is pornography banned from the office? Are pornographers banned as well? Should I have her sign it after work someplace else? Is it any different then? At what point in the day do I acceptably go from coworker or boss to fan? You never move from 'boss' to 'other' as long as that person works under you. Examples of successful suits on the part of the plantiff that were given in the previous harassment & managers seminar I was at included: A party at being held at an employee's house and someone put on some porn. One of the coworkers made a comment about how one of the actresses looked like one of the female coworkers while she was there. A manager was present as well, and laughed along. The manager was successfuly sued for creating a hostile working environment. Whoopsie. The case you state here is correct. He should have been slapped hard on that. First he shouldn't have allowed a damned porno being played in front of a group of coworkers and if he couldn't stop it he should have left. The difference in your arguement and mine is that the actress in question *IS* the coworker! That is completely different. Are you now saying he can't even ask her what she does outside of work? As soon as she says, "I do porn on the internet," is he now liable?? Again, I ask you this simple question,"What is the difference between allowing bosses and coworkers to view my naked body outside of work FOR MONEY and having a website that allows the same thing?" Are you going to say, "Well, it is up to you to just not look. SHAME on you!" The boss placing people in uncomfortable situations is unforgiveable, but what about the employee doing the same thing? Plus, I cannot see how she can say jiggling her jigglies for free just to butter up the boss is worse than allowing the same thing to happen except he has to pay for it up front! The Internet is public, people! Once you put something of yourself out there, it is available to EVERYONE! You have gone from viewing content to creating content. There IS a responsibility associated with that act. Be ready to answer to it. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 09, 2005, 09:53:25 AM In other words, her life is the MMOG release cycle. Hur hur. You said release cycle. (http://www.beavis-butthead.ru/pictures2/crap.jpg) RELEASE! RELEASE! (http://www.beavis-butthead.ru/pictures/stars.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: 5150 on December 09, 2005, 10:00:29 AM I think if everyone masturbated at least 50% more than they currently do, we'd all be a much happier people. And more tired. And hungry. Then I'd probably have RSI and not enough time left to do anything constructive Did I actually type that?!?! BTW Righ your last post had me in fucking stitches! :-D Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Margalis on December 09, 2005, 10:36:47 AM How about whiny? Two-faced? Disingenuous? It may be whiny, but if it is true I don't really see it as very whiny. It certainly is not two-faced or disingenuous. It's really very simple - at a job you should be judged based on *relevant* criteria. It's a very straightforward, simple and easily defendable position. What the person may be doing at some other job really doesn't matter. The problem here, again, is not that someone was flirting or shaking her rack. The problem was they got promoted (supposedly) for it. Whether or not the complainer shakes her rack at another job (which requires it) or at a bar after work really isn't relevant at all. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 09, 2005, 10:43:00 AM Wow, you people stayed up all night internetting away.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Dren on December 09, 2005, 10:51:58 AM How about whiny? Two-faced? Disingenuous? It may be whiny, but if it is true I don't really see it as very whiny. It certainly is not two-faced or disingenuous. It's really very simple - at a job you should be judged based on *relevant* criteria. It's a very straightforward, simple and easily defendable position. What the person may be doing at some other job really doesn't matter. The problem here, again, is not that someone was flirting or shaking her rack. The problem was they got promoted (supposedly) for it. Whether or not the complainer shakes her rack at another job (which requires it) or at a bar after work really isn't relevant at all. Yes it is. If you are going to tell us that nothing from outside of work finds its way into work, I'd have to call you a liar. If somebody wants to be taken seriously about their own personal pasttimes or hobbies or other employment, then there should not be any reason aspects of those activities couldn't be discussed openly at the other job in question. When I find out that a person has a similar hobby or one I find interesting outside of work, I talked to them about it. It is called being nice and respecting that person's interests and trying to find common ground. That's how a team becomes coesive and effective. Many times there is a bit of teasing going on to break the tension and stress of work. Some of that could be perceived as using ones body to get ahead in a job where that shouldn't be the criteria, but seriously in an indirect way it is. If a person is part of a team and is unwilling to open up to a reasonable degree, they become a weak link in the chain. People start to prefer not to work with them or just not as much. The team starts to become a group of indivuals and that is just not as effective. Now how does that work when a person is as described by this Malice in question? What do I talk to her about at work? "Have you had any good pictures added to your site lately? Did they bring in more money for you?" Everyone of those questions would be great if the person were selling potholders. Porn, not so much. If the boss were asking these questions of her and she got promoted, how would that look from that perspective to the other women in the firm? If the other women had actually had sex with the boss or physically lifted her shirt for him, then that is a completely different story, but if it was just casual friendliness being displayed and she was rewarded for it. Well, that IS how it works and I'm not sure the alternative would be any better. Nice gals finish first. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Warryyr on December 09, 2005, 10:52:14 AM "Ho-ho-ho" (http://www.blueharvest.net/images/xmas/xmasyoda.jpg) Edit: kitten add (http://www.chris-franklin.co.uk/news/december/912/friends/kitten.jpg) Hey, that cat's my avatar! Yippee. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 09, 2005, 11:17:09 AM Internet, Seriouis Buziness. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/2005/12/08/) With that I think the thread can die. :-D NSFW fucker. That picture wasn't there before. The other one was quite harmless. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: 5150 on December 09, 2005, 12:15:54 PM Wow, you people stayed up all night internetting away. I hear that thar interweb is global thing GMT ftw! (or something) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Cheddar on December 09, 2005, 12:33:32 PM Wow, you people stayed up all night internetting away. I hear that thar interweb is global thing GMT ftw! (or something) Europeans do not have computers. We all know that. I missed the monthly interesting thread :( Damnit, there is always January! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 09, 2005, 12:44:55 PM Wow, you people stayed up all night internetting away. I hear that thar interweb is global thing GMT ftw! (or something) Europeans do not have computers. We all know that. I missed the monthly interesting thread :( Damnit, there is always January! You are always late to the party. Get with the program! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 08:05:36 PM I have to admit, I never even read the first 10 or so posts.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 09, 2005, 08:14:53 PM I have to admit, I never even read the first 10 or so posts. If you keep that up, you'll NEVER know what the topic started out to be! I bet you think this thread is about boobies, don't you? Just like all the other threads you pop in on at the end! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Cheddar on December 09, 2005, 08:18:44 PM Signe, this thread IS about boobies. And its glorious.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 09, 2005, 08:23:36 PM (http://www.vroma.org/images/mcmanus_images/venusmelos_5.jpg)
Edit: So much porn... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 08:45:03 PM Wow, you people stayed up all night internetting away. It was evening for me. Fun as this thread is, it's not worth an all-nighter... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 09, 2005, 08:55:44 PM I wonder if anyone noticed the preview video where she shakes her boobs for money...
This, after she rants about a girl she worked with....who shakes her boobs for money... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 09, 2005, 09:06:35 PM Yeah I watched it. Nice boobs.
I missed the part where the people at her work knew about her porn site. I had the impression that none of them knew till after she left and started blogging on ? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 10, 2005, 01:33:07 AM A couple more posts of teh drama. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/malice_bd/)
Ya know, if she can keep up this speed of rambling like a newly minted schoolgirl, she could provide entertainment in boredom for at least a year. This is my favorite part from the last 3 posts though: Quote I would just like to state that the more I get flamed, the more money I make. That's right...people talk about me, which makes other people get curious enough to check me out, and then a couple dozen sign up. I've gotten over a dozen new signups since that discussion started. They talk about how they think I'm unattractive, but then they post dozens of pictures of me and link my site and give me even more traffic ^^. And other guild members email me going omfg you're hawt! It all serves my purpose...the more you bitch about and try to mock me the more good you're actually doing me. Please, please please sign up for the girl's site. I want to see how many people it would take to make her realize she's shaking her tits for a promotion. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Typhon on December 10, 2005, 06:13:17 AM Please, please please sign up for the girl's site. I want to see how many people it would take to make her realize she's shaking her tits for a promotion. Admit it, El Gallo is paying you to "get my baby to 10!" Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 10, 2005, 06:32:32 AM I like Curry.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 10, 2005, 08:20:30 AM I would kill for a proper Chicken Biryani.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 10, 2005, 08:39:39 AM Over a dozen since this crap started? Big fucking deal.
:roll: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Velorath on December 10, 2005, 09:37:28 AM When you run a "porn" site and still can't afford a working car, that might be a good sign that maybe you didn't make the greatest career choice.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Merusk on December 10, 2005, 10:45:20 AM When you run a "porn" site and still can't afford a working car, that might be a good sign that maybe you didn't make the greatest career choice. Well that's evidence, as well as: Over a dozen since this crap started? Big fucking deal. And being excited enough about your # of people online to make Quote Holy shit...180 people on my site right now. 180 x $16/mo = another $2880. I <3 flamers. a title..WOo hoo! 34k a year (before taxes) in California! She's rich! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: ahoythematey on December 10, 2005, 11:35:42 AM Wow.
Did bruce kill somebody and steal their account? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 10, 2005, 01:52:24 PM I couldn't even bring myself to read that dribble.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Slyfeind on December 10, 2005, 02:17:03 PM Quote I would just like to state that the more I get flamed, the more money I make. That's right...people talk about me, which makes other people get curious enough to check me out, and then a couple dozen sign up. I've gotten over a dozen new signups since that discussion started. They talk about how they think I'm unattractive, but then they post dozens of pictures of me and link my site and give me even more traffic ^^. And other guild members email me going omfg you're hawt! It all serves my purpose...the more you bitch about and try to mock me the more good you're actually doing me. Oh gawd, she's not supposed to actually TELL anyone! She should be all in an uproar going "*SOB!* Please don't make fun of me! You're making me feel like what I'm doing is WRONG! Like I'm NAUGHTY! How naughty do I feel? Why, funny you should ask, I'll show you in my next update, but only for members!" Or something. Anyway, yay money. I'm an actor therefore I'm a whore too. However you can get it. *shrug* Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Samwise on December 10, 2005, 03:39:26 PM I couldn't even bring myself to read that dribble. I've seen people do this about five times this week. FFS. (http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/dribble.html) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 10, 2005, 03:40:22 PM I've never seen anyone replace drivel with dribble. Jesus. That's astoundingly bad.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 10, 2005, 03:47:38 PM I didn't even know there was a "dribble". Hmm!
I myself use neither "drivel" or "dribble", but "drool" instead (ex. "Do you really believe that drool?"). Hopefully I haven't made a mistake as well. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 11, 2005, 02:03:38 PM Raph's manual really is more interesting than her. Promise.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Xanthippe on December 11, 2005, 04:38:41 PM Whore stopped being derogatory in 1994. Now, cunt, that's a derogatory thing to call a woman. Also clambake and spunkbucket - but whore? No. Are you hiding something? I don't know a single guy who really knows any girl born after 1975 who would be as offended as you by the word whore. PARTICULARLY girls who dwell in netspaces. My grandparents would be offended, my mother would be offended, but they haven't been desensitized by the intarweb. And if this girl is offended? Then she's a stupid and naive as well. Reality check please. I graduated high school in 1975, but I cannot believe things have changed this much. I've been on the intarweb for a very long time, and am desensitized by most things, but I don't buy this. I think most of the females I know of any age would be mightily offended to be called a whore. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 11, 2005, 04:42:29 PM I think "bitch", if anything, is the only derogatory word that females might have learned to laugh off these days. Calling someone a "whore" might not be dropping the bomb as some words would be, but it's getting up there.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 04:48:14 PM Reality check please. I graduated high school in 1975, but I cannot believe things have changed this much. I've been on the intarweb for a very long time, and am desensitized by most things, but I don't buy this. I think most of the females I know of any age would be mightily offended to be called a whore. I was referring to girls that graduated high school after MTV's Grind started coming on the air at 4pm after school. Or even after 90210/Dawson's Creek/etc. I'm a little over a year out of college and the generation that I graduated with graduated whore into its vernacular about a little more than a decade ago. Slut is still a little taboo, but whore? Definately not, we're talking about a demographic youth between 18-25 that thinks a nice dinner is necessary before any sort of sex. Also see: Girls Gone Wild and any number of the dating shows on the air compared to what was on in the 70s. Coincidentally, this is also the generation quite raised on modern video games. Oh yea, and rap. If rap can't desensitize you, nothing will. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 11, 2005, 05:02:08 PM Also See: Ever-changing definitions and various backpedalling while clinging to "I am right! Dammit!" FTW
Whore stopped being derogatory in 1994. Now, cunt, that's a derogatory thing to call a woman. Also clambake and spunkbucket - but whore? No. And fuck MTV's "Grind" that you keep trying to use as an excuse for claiming that social mores have changed everywhere. Give it up, mate. You don't get to tell girls what they are or should be offended by. You're just some faceless wanker on the internet, like the rest of us. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 11, 2005, 05:37:15 PM Heh. Context is everything. Come over to my city where the word Cunt is regularly used in Management meetings. Whore barely registers.
But we HAVE NO CLASS. I now return you to your regularly scheduled dick-fencing. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 11, 2005, 05:46:11 PM Nothing pisses me off more than a bunch of men pretending to be experts on women.
Quote I was referring to girls that graduated high school after MTV's Grind started coming on the air at 4pm after school. Or even after 90210/Dawson's Creek/etc. I'm a little over a year out of college and the generation that I graduated with graduated whore into its vernacular about a little more than a decade ago. Slut is still a little taboo, but whore? Definately not, we're talking about a demographic youth between 18-25 that thinks a nice dinner is necessary before any sort of sex. Also see: Girls Gone Wild and any number of the dating shows on the air compared to what was on in the 70s. Coincidentally, this is also the generation quite raised on modern video games. Oh yea, and rap. If rap can't desensitize you, nothing will. Bollocks... just bollocks. Stick to what you know... faggy Japanese trends and... wait, I'll come up with something. Well, maybe not. The three women who would talk to you in college are obviously abnormal and the ones you see on cheap tv shows are not real. For being such the expert, you sure know how to piss women off! Plonker. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 11, 2005, 05:56:20 PM I thought the girls on Girls Gone Wild were real.
That was CGI? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 11, 2005, 05:56:33 PM Okay. Signe's mad. Not good.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 11, 2005, 06:01:17 PM Nothing pisses me off more than a bunch of men pretending to be experts on women. Turnabout is fair play considering Cosmopolitan is still around.Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 06:05:06 PM Give it up, mate. You don't get to tell girls what they are or should be offended by. You're just some faceless wanker on the internet, like the rest of us. The problem here is age difference and the sensitivity issues that come with it. I'm being railed against by women who are completely out of the age bracket to which I'm referring. I already said, before any of these last few posts came up that there are a whole mess of women who would still be offended by it. And they're speaking up, despite the fact I already agreed with them. There are much more insulting things that could be said than "whore." On top of that, no one ever said they were an expert on women. Christ, that didn't even enter into the equation. But the pervasiveness of colloquialisms? Yea, I think I have some experience with that. As Ironwood just said, it barely registers. And it barely registers amongst the people I have contact with as well. You want to piss off a high school or college girl these days? Call them a cheap slut or a cuntrag. You want to make yourself look 30-40 years old, call them whore. It just doesn't have the destroyer like powers it once had. Hell, on a scale of 1-10 it probably hits about a 2. Maybe a 3. To people 15-30 years older than me? Probably about a 7-8. It's just how things go. In 10-15 years I would suspect "cunt" won't be all that and a bag of chips either. Age makes all the difference in the world. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 06:07:42 PM Nothing pisses me off more than a bunch of men pretending to be experts on women. Turnabout is fair play considering Cosmopolitan is still around.Over 38% of Maxim readers are women. Just...putting that out there. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 11, 2005, 05:18:00 PM This site appears to be broken. I can't go into it further as I have to do something else. Someone do something!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Xanthippe on December 11, 2005, 05:44:43 PM Okay. Signe's mad. Not good. Maybe this will make her feel better. (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/Wheres_Waldoooo/silly%20pix/Aphex20twin.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 11, 2005, 05:47:05 PM As Ironwood just said, it barely registers. Ironwood was talking about Glasgow. Heck you only have to go as far south as East Kilbride (http://www.google.com/local?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&safe=off&q=east+kilbride&near=Glasgow,+UK&sa=X&oi=localr) for Glaswegian vernacular to be unacceptable. Actually the younger generations in Glasgow (post city of kultchir) are more uptight about colourful language than Billy Connolly's generation. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 11, 2005, 07:42:44 PM If you really want to be cutting edge, you call a woman a Slore (slut + whore, i think you get it).
It'll put hair on your chest, I swear. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Lum on December 11, 2005, 08:01:02 PM Nothing pisses me off more than a bunch of men pretending to be experts on women. I freely confess to not being an expert on women, so I asked one. She looked at me with that "Are you *seriously* asking me this question" death stare, so I'd have to say no, being called "whores" do not amuse women. Generally, I've found they prefer being called by their name, or occasionally "pooky", or in the rarest of cases "chica". But if you use "whore" as an endearment, you probably think you are a "pimp". Note: you're not. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 11, 2005, 08:29:01 PM Boo boo kitty fuck?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 11, 2005, 08:34:24 PM She must be new at life, or something.
Cry. Some. More. Newb. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 11, 2005, 08:47:05 PM If you really want to be cutting edge, you call a woman a Slore (slut + whore, i think you get it). It'll put a hare on your chest, I swear. Bruce? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 11, 2005, 08:54:40 PM If you really want to be cutting edge, you call a woman a Slore (slut + whore, i think you get it). It'll put a hare on your chest, I swear. Bruce? I saw bruce running amok tonight. /emote bunny hop It sent shivers into my waking soul. Help me. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 09:16:27 PM Nothing pisses me off more than a bunch of men pretending to be experts on women. I freely confess to not being an expert on women, so I asked one. She looked at me with that "Are you *seriously* asking me this question" death stare, so I'd have to say no, being called "whores" do not amuse women. Generally, I've found they prefer being called by their name, or occasionally "pooky", or in the rarest of cases "chica". But if you use "whore" as an endearment, you probably think you are a "pimp". Note: you're not. Now I see what's wrong here. There seems to have been the belief that I meant you could call a random woman on the street or someone who is almost a stranger a whore. No, you couldn't even get away with "idiot." But if I'd said to one of my friends in high school "Stop being such a whore" it wouldn't have even set off the "you done hurt me" meter. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: stray on December 11, 2005, 09:24:03 PM Don't explain yourself. Nobody listens.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 09:26:52 PM Don't explain yourself. Nobody listens. That's because people on the internet go to stage 6-2 of Super Mario Bros. 3 and get the Hammer Bros. costume when they get offended by shit that shouldn't offend them. Because it's the internet. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 11, 2005, 09:58:05 PM so how about that internet?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 11, 2005, 10:09:37 PM I hear the explanation changes every post. GO GO INTERNET!
But we were at one point discussing if Ms CSR was a "whore" since she poses naked on the interweb which somehow morphed into "calling her a whore really isn't offensive, says me, so it's ok." Swearing in Scotland is ok, 'cos they're all 'ard men. And you know what they say about 'ard men... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 11, 2005, 10:29:09 PM I hear the explanation changes every post. GO GO INTERNET! But we do agree she's a whore right?But we were at one point discussing if Ms CSR was a "whore" since she poses naked on the interweb which somehow morphed into "calling her a whore really isn't offensive, says me, so it's ok." Swearing in Scotland is ok, 'cos they're all 'ard men. And you know what they say about 'ard men... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 10:29:34 PM Fabricated beat me to it.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 11, 2005, 11:04:57 PM Reading this thread made me listen to the conversations of several specimens in schilds supposed "age bracket".
He is right. Well, in parts at least. The German equivalents of whore (Nutte and Hure to be specific) are comonly used amongst them. But the intention is still to piss of the other person, but it does not seem to make much of an impression. I was surprised, but I am not willing to put this theory to a test and actually call another human being ( or a woman for that matter :evil: ) anything degoratory, I am too old to run away from mobs of mad women. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 11, 2005, 11:12:29 PM Finally I see the problem.
Me being in the 30-40 bracket, Schild is one of those youngsters that don't speak the same language as us old people! Get off my lawn, boy! And take that Fabri friend of yours with you or I'll call Mrs. Cated! @Der Helm: Use a bicycle! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 11, 2005, 11:28:10 PM @Der Helm: Use a bicycle! Hm, I have to think about that. (http://www.toysdirect.co.uk/products/medium/thomas12bike.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 11, 2005, 11:32:04 PM He is right. Well, in parts at least. The German equivalents of whore (Nutte and Hure to be specific) are comonly used amongst them. But the intention is still to piss of the other person, but it does not seem to make much of an impression. My point. Quote ...I am not willing to put this theory to a test and actually call another human being ( or a woman for that matter :evil: ) anything degoratory, I am too old to run away from mobs of mad women. Agreed. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Fabricated on December 11, 2005, 11:50:12 PM Finally I see the problem. But, but! We were going to go see Leo Auffmann's Happiness Machine and get some shaved ice!Me being in the 30-40 bracket, Schild is one of those youngsters that don't speak the same language as us old people! Get off my lawn, boy! And take that Fabri friend of yours with you or I'll call Mrs. Cated! God, you reminded me of how much I hate Ray Bradbury. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 12, 2005, 12:59:54 AM Of the attention kind, definately, of the slut kind, nope.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Calantus on December 12, 2005, 01:50:21 AM Not that I particularly want to wade into this whole whore debate, but schild is actually right here. I use "whore" and "slut" all the time (though most often addressed to my mates/brother). I probably use it as often as I use "bitch", and I've never had anyone get pissy at me over any of them. And yes I mean things like just flat out calling a girl a whore or slut to her face for something she'd done/said and she not going berzerk over it. Naturally if I called someone a whore just out of the blue I wouldn't make a very good impression, but I'd get much the same reaction calling them an idiot under the circumstances.
So yeah, you guys must be out of touch or something. :P EDIT: I DO remember one incident when a friend called a girl a slut and she went off crying and wouldnt look at him for days, but that was back in 7th grade. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 12, 2005, 01:53:18 AM Of the attention kind, definately, of the slut kind, nope. I have it on good authority that her milkshakes bring all the boys to the yard. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 12, 2005, 02:21:53 AM So yeah, you guys must be out of touch or something. :P 7th grade ? Whoa, I am more out of touch than I thought. I am not sure lots of 7th graders knew even the meaning of the word slut.EDIT: I DO remember one incident when a friend called a girl a slut and she went off crying and wouldn't look at him for days, but that was back in 7th grade. (7th grade means you are somewhat around 12 years old over here, YMMV and whatnot) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 12, 2005, 02:24:07 AM 7th grade ? Whoa, I am more out of touch than I thought. I am not sure lots of 7th graders knew even the meaning of the word slut. 12-13 years old in the states. And hell yes most 7th grade girls know about the word slut. Hell, I remember hearing it more during the summer between 6th and 7th grade than I did during my entire time in college. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 12, 2005, 02:33:47 AM I feel old!
Fuck off and die the lot of you! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 12, 2005, 02:38:23 AM 12-13 years old in the states. And hell yes most 7th grade girls know about the word slut. Hell, I remember hearing it more during the summer between 6th and 7th grade than I did during my entire time in college. Well, 5 years really seem to make a difference. But you Americans always have to be ahead of the curve, don't you. :evil: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 12, 2005, 02:39:44 AM I feel old! You first old man.Fuck off and die the lot of you! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: 5150 on December 12, 2005, 04:48:06 AM Raph's manual really is more interesting than her. Promise. Agreed Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 12, 2005, 05:17:48 AM Swearing in Scotland is ok, 'cos they're all 'ard men. And you know what they say about 'ard men... Not everywhere. If you use that sort of language in Edinburgh, they'll Morris Dance you right out of town. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Xanthippe on December 12, 2005, 07:14:59 AM I think I've come up with a great intarweb test for mmog players to find out if "she" is really a female or not - (or maybe just if "whore" has lost its punch among women).
While grouped with a female avatar, try this - call the females whores when you speak to them. See who quits the group. I d-double-dare you. :hello_kitty_2: Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 12, 2005, 07:24:20 AM Woot, page ten. The highlight of my internet career. I'd like to thank my momma, Elvis, the academy and all the little people who made this possible.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Typhon on December 12, 2005, 07:25:43 AM Admit it, El Gallo is paying you to "get my baby to 10!" I'm modifying my theory, I now believe that El Gallo is paying both Schild and Signe to keep this thread going. Edit: see?! he's there, ...watching, ...gloating. A payoff is the only reasonable explanation. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 12, 2005, 08:18:01 AM I don't know about schild, but he's definitely pretending to be me.
(I want my underwear back, you perv!) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 12, 2005, 09:22:10 AM We should put big, NSFW furry pr0n ad banners on this thread alone, so we can not only rake in the dough, but warp your fragile little minds in the bargain. Because you fuckers took this thread to page 11.
Her nipples go to 11. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 12, 2005, 09:23:59 AM It's my fault it went to 11. I'm sorry. :oops: I should have been more careful.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 12, 2005, 09:24:31 AM I like nipples.
I bet Raph has beautiful nipples. I bet a person could write a 65-page manual on Raph's nipples. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: WayAbvPar on December 12, 2005, 09:36:04 AM I like nipples. I bet Raph has beautiful nipples. I bet a person could write a 65-page manual on Raph's nipples. So I guess I will be skipping breakfast now. (we need a gagging emoticon) This thread is nearly every kind of wrong there is. And that is NOT an invitation to find other wrongness to add. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Evil Elvis on December 12, 2005, 09:40:56 AM (http://noticias.hispavista.com/imagenes/internacional/2005/03/26/a20050326034440.jpg)
This thread needs a mercy killing. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 12, 2005, 09:49:11 AM Of the attention kind, definately, of the slut kind, nope. I have it on good authority that her milkshakes bring all the boys to the yard. I found teh funnehs, but now the whole office is looking at me funny. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: tazelbain on December 12, 2005, 11:01:27 AM There needs to be a "dead to me" button that permanently removes a thread from my view, so I don't accidently view one of these degenerate threads again.
EDIT: English, Motherfucker, do you speak it? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 12, 2005, 11:02:05 AM There needs to be a "dead to me" button that permanently removes a thread from my view, so I don't accidently one of these degenerate threads again. Your sentence. It is missing words. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 12, 2005, 11:03:28 AM There needs to be a "dead to me" button that permanently removes a thread from my view, so I don't accidently enjoy one of these degenerate threads again. Your sentence. It is missing words. I fixed it for him there. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Nebu on December 12, 2005, 11:06:14 AM I wouldn't mess with Mordechai Jefferson Carver if I were you.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Morfiend on December 12, 2005, 11:32:29 AM Thread Says " Den Me!"
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 12, 2005, 11:46:00 AM Not before page 12!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 12, 2005, 08:25:30 PM You can't see tits on the radio.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Calantus on December 12, 2005, 08:29:32 PM I am quite certain there is not a single item in the whole world that lacks a novelty version with tits attached.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: schild on December 12, 2005, 09:00:10 PM I am quite certain there is not a single item in the whole world that lacks a novelty version with tits attached. Then I want my game developer bobblehead collection. And the moob variant. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: 5150 on December 12, 2005, 11:55:55 PM I like nipples. I bet Raph has beautiful nipples. I bet a person could write a 65-page manual on Raph's nipples. I'll pass, ta. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 13, 2005, 04:24:32 AM Not that I particularly want to wade into this whole whore debate, but schild is actually right here. I use "whore" and "slut" all the time (though most often addressed to my mates/brother). So yeah, you guys must be out of touch or something. :P EDIT: I DO remember one incident when a friend called a girl a slut and she went off crying and wouldnt look at him for days, but that was back in 7th grade. Translation: My limited personal experiences (which apparently involve calling fellow males the term) = a representitive sampling of the offensiveness of the word to females, everywhere. uh-huh. Guys who know each other well always adress each other using profanity. My mates and I call each other all kinds of things, just like you do. But it's the difference between calling your mate "buttcheeks" and someone you barely know the same term that gets you the lose here. Can we talk about something more interesting now? Has she posted any new retardeness yet? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 13, 2005, 04:37:52 AM Hasn't this thread hit 12 pages yet? Why are you all slacking?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 13, 2005, 05:17:44 AM Once they get 12, their gonna want 13... you know that. They like this thread. It's about titties.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 13, 2005, 05:29:58 AM It's about titties. Thank you for reminding me, this thread needs more nipples !(http://images.ebsco.com/pob/KnightRifles/catalog/Red_Hot_Nipple.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Calantus on December 13, 2005, 08:04:53 AM Translation: My limited personal experiences (which apparently involve calling fellow males the term) = a representitive sampling of the offensiveness of the word to females, everywhere. uh-huh. Way to miss the point. When I say that it is most often addressed to my brother/friends I was using to balance me saying I use the terms "often". I most certainly don't go around calling other people derogatory names all the time, be the word whore or otherwise. I even specifically said I'd called girls whores to their faces, and you missed it. And no, when I said girls I didn't just mean "friends who are female" I mean girls to whome I had no business calling anything too severe if I didn't want my eyes clawed out. But hey, I guess my sample is too small. All the OTHER young girls think being called a whore is so dreadfully awful. I bet they wouldn't even tell you about the blowjobs and handjobs they gave their boyfriend on the weekend when you asked "so what did you get up to on the weekend?" casually during homeroom. I will say anal sex hadn't seemed to have caught on in a big way with the young slutties back then though, but I guess a couple years can change matters. I have actually used the term "young slutties" to address groups of girls btw, including girls I'd ran into at a party who I didn't know at all, and weren't even from my suburb. They generally don't mind at all, and most actually find the term amusing. Meh. I really should have known better than to try it. Once people get the "you're wrong" attitude in place they don't give a flying fuck what is said or who is saying it. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 13, 2005, 09:05:50 AM Meh. I really should have known better than to try it. Once people get the "you're wrong" attitude in place they don't give a flying fuck what is said or who is saying it. You're wrong about that. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: MrHat on December 13, 2005, 06:55:08 PM (http://www.hookahcompany.com/images_products/297_big.jpg)
In arabic, we call them 'bizza", or nipples. Hookah ends. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Calantus on December 13, 2005, 09:10:28 PM Meh. I really should have known better than to try it. Once people get the "you're wrong" attitude in place they don't give a flying fuck what is said or who is saying it. You're wrong about that. I believe that it is YOU who are wrong. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Rasix on December 13, 2005, 11:09:11 PM 10 paces, turn, and fire.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Azazel on December 14, 2005, 02:29:50 PM 10 paces, turn, and fire. ..but remember kids, the barrel goes under the chin, facing upwards and back. Simply putting the barrel in your mouth and aiming backward is asking for a world of fun when they save you... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 15, 2005, 04:31:09 AM Remember kids, it's down the road, not across the street
(http://people.freenet.de/shady/69.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 15, 2005, 05:20:05 AM Yeah, you guys really hate your kids, don't you ?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 15, 2005, 06:10:44 AM Yeah, you guys really hate your kids, don't you ? The img is from a Euro site, not a US one. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Sky on December 15, 2005, 07:07:22 AM Remember kids, Buddy says jump head-first off a tall building! Feet-first means wheelchairs.
Wheelchairs are fun, too! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 15, 2005, 07:22:27 AM No wonder! I keep finding tall buildings and trying to jump up!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 15, 2005, 07:43:57 AM A US-Europe "who hates their kids more" pissing contest is the only thing I can think of that would make this thread better.
Oh, wait. I heard a buxom EQ2 forum moderator quit her job and started a nudie site. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 15, 2005, 07:51:17 AM A US-Europe "who hates their kids more" pissing contest is the only thing I can think of that would make this thread better. I wasn't pissing on Europe, just Ironwood who seems to have unresolved issues regarding the US. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: HaemishM on December 15, 2005, 07:55:32 AM I hardly think they are unresolved.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 15, 2005, 07:59:01 AM And we're off!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: cevik on December 15, 2005, 08:04:43 AM And we're off! One response from Ironwood, not mentioning locality at all (I took the "you" to mean the two posters above, perhaps I'm wrong). Five responses from others, baiting Ironwood into a fight. Yes.. lets blame Ironwood. Fucking Goddamned Euros. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 15, 2005, 08:10:02 AM Yeah, you guys really hate your kids, don't you ? I would not call it hate.I despise them, after they start to behave like the assholes that adolescents are ... And now get of my lawn ... *shakes fist* Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 15, 2005, 08:15:20 AM Fucking Goddamned Euros. What about them ? (http://viladoconde.blogs.sapo.pt/arquivo/euros.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 15, 2005, 08:22:28 AM Only people outside of Great Britain and poncey posh buggers consider it part of Europe. Don't try and use any logic here... it will be ignored and deservedly so.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: cevik on December 15, 2005, 08:24:52 AM Fucking Goddamned Euros. What about them ? (http://viladoconde.blogs.sapo.pt/arquivo/euros.jpg) They are fucking heavy, that's what. Once someone threw one at my head and it hurt. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 15, 2005, 08:37:03 AM And we're off! One response from Ironwood, not mentioning locality at all (I took the "you" to mean the two posters above, perhaps I'm wrong). Five responses from others, baiting Ironwood into a fight. Yes.. lets blame Ironwood. Fucking Goddamned Euros. Wait, what happened there ? ? ? Yes, I was meaning the two posters above me who made suicide references to kids. Seriously, is there a chat channel or a Vent server somewhere where you guys have got together and started calling me an Anti-American Dick behind my back ? I have no idea where half this shit is coming from. All I know is I get most of my posting done while you are asleep, which is really depressing. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Tebonas on December 15, 2005, 09:20:22 AM You are an Anti-American dick. All of us Europeans are. Also, last I heard most US democrats are. Enjoy the company.
Bummer about your posting hours, I share your pain. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Sky on December 15, 2005, 09:47:19 AM Fuck the democrats, try being an american libertarian. In the land of fucking liberty, fer crissakes.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Venkman on December 15, 2005, 09:56:44 AM Fuck the democrats, try being an american libertarian. In the land of fucking liberty, fer crissakes. Wait a sec. I thought you were a librarian!Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Bunk on December 15, 2005, 01:21:52 PM You are an Anti-American dick. All of us Europeans are. Also, last I heard most US democrats are. Enjoy the company. Bummer about your posting hours, I share your pain. Can us Canadians jump in on this too? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 15, 2005, 01:56:55 PM Canadians think I'm a dick too ?
I give up. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Nebu on December 15, 2005, 01:58:21 PM That's the beauty of being a political independant: I can think that everyone is an idiot.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: cevik on December 15, 2005, 02:02:03 PM Canadians think I'm a dick too ? I give up. When the anti-European sentiment drives you into your darkest moments of depression, I shall give you a beacon of shining light at which you can stare and realise exactly how well you have it and much worse it could be: You could have to live over here with these assholes. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Bunk on December 15, 2005, 03:59:50 PM Canadians think I'm a dick too ? I give up. Actually, we wanted to jump in on the America hating stuff. So long as we can hate them politely of course. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 15, 2005, 04:52:06 PM Why must you hate all Americans? Just hate on the administration.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 15, 2005, 05:17:38 PM I once met a Canadian named William Arthur. He was pleasant.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 15, 2005, 05:38:07 PM Nix is Canadian.
He's pleasant, albeit strange. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Samwise on December 15, 2005, 05:53:05 PM Nix is Canadian. He's pleasant, albeit strange. I think that nicely sums up all the Canadians I know, actually. Not that I'm stereotyping. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Typhon on December 15, 2005, 06:14:09 PM Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 15, 2005, 06:24:44 PM Nix is sweet. Sometimes I want to pinch him really, really hard.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 15, 2005, 06:48:02 PM Why must you hate all Americans? Just hate on the administration. All Americans can be democratically elected to be a part of the administration. It's safer this way. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Velorath on December 15, 2005, 06:55:26 PM Why must you hate all Americans? Just hate on the administration. All Americans can be democratically elected to be a part of the administration. Well, that was the original concept anyway. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Roac on December 15, 2005, 09:17:08 PM Why must you hate all Americans? Just hate on the administration. All Americans can be democratically elected to be a part of the administration. Well, that was the original concept anyway. No, the original concept was to empower white male landowners. Extending that to everyone else was a later addition. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: squirrel on December 15, 2005, 11:45:07 PM Nix is Canadian. He's pleasant, albeit strange. I think that nicely sums up all the Canadians I know, actually. Not that I'm stereotyping. And, conversely, most Americans i know. Without the pleasant bit of course. :P No, no, i'm a Canadian who actually like Americans. But yes, i do despise your current administration. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 16, 2005, 01:36:30 AM I made it clear in another thread (to Sky, who, you know, asked) that of the Americans I've met I didn't like many of them but that my main 'issues', as Roac puts it, lie firmly with the current Administration. I have nothing personal against American People, except the same contempt with which I hold ALL people, all over the globe.
After 1800 posts, I'm surprised I have to make that clear again. But there you go. PS - I put a Canadian up the other month. She was lovely. And doing my brother. So, I'd go with nice but very, very, very strange. I mean, MY BROTHER. Sheesh. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 16, 2005, 05:16:25 AM What did yoiu put her up?
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 16, 2005, 06:09:16 AM You know, I knew I'd get called on that.
"To put someone up" means to provide them with room and board on a temporary timescale. AS YOU WELL KNEW ! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Der Helm on December 16, 2005, 06:20:46 AM "To put someone up" means to provide them with room and board on a temporary timescale. I have to admit, I was thinking of something else ...Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: cevik on December 16, 2005, 07:10:18 AM Why must you hate all Americans? Just hate on the administration. Look, I am American and I hate all Americans, except maybe 3 or 4. I can hardly blame the people overseas, who only see our exported Reality TV shows, which includes the hit "But Foriegn Relations Are Hard Work. We Even Had To Work Some Saturdays." Hell, for the first 2 months after the election all the Administration talked about was how the Americans, despite being begged for mercy by the rest of the world, gave them a mandate. How can you possibility hate the Administration and not hate the rest of us for enabling them? By all practical counts, it's our fault. They should hate us a lot more than they hate the Administration. The Administration had spent 10 years in think tanks discussing exactly what they would do if we gave them power, and they are doing those exact things. We are the people that fucking let them do it. I posit that you should not hate the Administration, instead you should hate all Americans. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: El Gallo on December 16, 2005, 07:24:07 AM Will jiggle manboobs for page 13! Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 16, 2005, 07:34:49 AM Will jiggle manboobs for page 13! (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v719/Epiphany1483/72601manboobscontestant15_marvin2.jpg) Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 16, 2005, 07:36:56 AM Oh, that's so not-safe-for-anything...
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Signe on December 16, 2005, 07:47:52 AM How can this man be allowed to continue to censor ME! It's not fair, I tell you!
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Shockeye on December 16, 2005, 07:54:22 AM How can this man be allowed to continue to censor ME! It's not fair, I tell you! Life isn't fair. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Soln on December 16, 2005, 08:01:57 AM You are an Anti-American dick. All of us Europeans are. Also, last I heard most US democrats are. Enjoy the company. Bummer about your posting hours, I share your pain. Can us Canadians jump in on this too? Go Leafs! And how did Halifax end up with the Commonwealth Games -- we don't even have a stadium? Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 16, 2005, 12:01:25 PM Cevik,
I really don't like your use of the word "we" and you generalizing statements about "us." I have no hand in what these idiots do, and did what I could to prevent what has occured. It's really not fair for you to simply clump people like me with the idiots that oh-so-passionately voted these people in, because they were scared of brown people. But whatever, this isn't even an argument worth having. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Typhon on December 17, 2005, 06:28:27 AM Strazos fix the quotes, it took my limited mental capacity 5 minutes to figure out that the above response is your text, not cevix. If I hadn't done this recently myself, would never have figured it out.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Strazos on December 17, 2005, 09:03:16 AM That seems like a personal problem.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Righ on December 17, 2005, 11:17:38 AM I really don't like your use of the word "we" and you generalizing statements about "us." That seems like a personal problem. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Blackguard on December 17, 2005, 07:20:01 PM I honestly cannot believe how much attention the throwaway remark about the 65 page community relations policies manual has gotten. :P I've read through the manual a few times, and we pretty much run according to the book that it is. I'm a lead on EverQuest II (CRM), I have reps for three languages, we have an events person on the team, two QA liaisons, and all the other fun stuff. Someday I'll write a nice shiny book on Community Relations after convincing Raph and Brenlo to work on it with me, and this is a great bit of reference material. Long, yes, but very useful.I wrote it when I was asked to create a community relations dept at SOE. That happened shortly after I got the CCO job. Prior to that, there was no dept, there were CRMs on individual games, and there was no consistent policy. EQ had no forums, SWG had extnsive community stuff, other games were somewhere in between. The manual says, in short form, - if you're not into community, here's why you should do it: retention, acquisition, respecting your customer. Here's some hard data to prove it. - the jobs you need are: mods, events person (if you will do that part), community relations manager, possibly assts to them, and QA/CS liaison. Here's handy job descs you can use when hiring. - btw, the CRM for a game should be considered a lead on the team - you need to meet regularly with the following folks: marketing, CS, QA, producers, team leads. You need to tell them what's up, what the community is antsy about, what stuff you're doing, and you need to hear what stuff they are doing with the game - you should be doing the following: forum posts (multiple a day). Newsletters -- not marketingy ones either. Features on the website including behind the scenes stuff. Fun little contests and such on the forums. Showcasing player-made stuff, like art, fan films, roleplaying, etc. You really should think about having a correspondent program. - btw, yes, you need to run forums. All our games will have forums henceforth. Here's the stock policies on bannings, etc. - here's some advice on handling problems: always be honest, be prompt, don't overpromise, etc etc. - here's the escalation process when something goes all woppy-jawed. - here's some books and websites tht might be helpful (Amy Jo Kim's book, etc) - now, the entire second half of the manual is the latest boring legal policies that you have to post on all the sites. That's pretty much it. We then proceeded to get forums for every game, CRMs for every game, and most of the doc implemented. And then Alan took over running the newly created dept. The End. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Margalis on December 18, 2005, 01:34:50 AM What did this have to do with jiggling boobs again? :-P
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Miasma on December 18, 2005, 08:39:08 AM Someday I'll write a nice shiny book on Community Relations after convincing Raph and Brenlo to work on it with me, and this is a great bit of reference material. Long, yes, but very useful. Section 3: Hiring PracticesPotential CRM Candidates Should Have the Following Qualities:
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SnakeCharmer on December 18, 2005, 07:06:01 PM Quote I've read through the manual a few times, and we pretty much run according to the book that it is. I'm a lead on EverQuest II (CRM), I have reps for three languages, we have an events person on the team, two QA liaisons, and all the other fun stuff. Someday I'll write a nice shiny book on Community Relations after convincing Raph and Brenlo to work on it with me, and this is a great bit of reference material. Long, yes, but very useful. Brenlo is a complete and total tool. Scratch that. I have more respect for my hedge trimmers than that guy... Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 19, 2005, 03:09:01 AM Giggle @ Miasma.
Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: SuperPopTart on December 19, 2005, 06:05:34 AM Quote I've read through the manual a few times, and we pretty much run according to the book that it is. I'm a lead on EverQuest II (CRM), I have reps for three languages, we have an events person on the team, two QA liaisons, and all the other fun stuff. Someday I'll write a nice shiny book on Community Relations after convincing Raph and Brenlo to work on it with me, and this is a great bit of reference material. Long, yes, but very useful. Brenlo is a complete and total tool. Scratch that. I have more respect for my hedge trimmers than that guy... Only redeemable soul at SOE: Mennix. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: cevik on December 19, 2005, 07:09:54 AM Cevik, I really don't like your use of the word "we" and you generalizing statements about "us." Too bad, we own these fuckers and by extension they reflect on us. Don't like, it? Go back to kindergarten where life is fair. Quote I have no hand in what these idiots do, and did what I could to prevent what has occured. It's really not fair for you to simply clump people like me with the idiots that oh-so-passionately voted these people in, because they were scared of brown people. I did what I could to get these assholes out of office as well, and apparently I didn't do enough. Want to redeem yourself in the eyes of the world? Then we need to do more next time. Want a dose of reality? The Sunni Arab being tortured in Iraq as we speak doesn't give a flying fuck about your Faux Outrage when he clumps all Americans together in the same boat. Voted for them or not, volunteered for the other guy or not, doesn't matter, in the court of the world we're fucked, so we may as well learn to deal with it, because complaining on a message board about games isn't going to do you one iota of good. Title: Re: More SoE office drama Post by: Ironwood on December 19, 2005, 07:37:43 AM But I like complaining on this messageboard about games. Some games suck. So you have to complain about them.
FACT. |