|
Title: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: Kenrick on November 30, 2005, 10:51:02 AM ...because The Rock wouldn't have been there to protect me from this motherfucker:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/30/051130183023.fgq8rof0.html (http://www.cinema.com/image_lib/3888_0477_thumb.jpg) Title: Re: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: Shockeye on November 30, 2005, 11:07:17 AM Harry Hamlin helped contribute to their extinction.
(http://www.scifimoviepage.com/images/clash1.jpg) Title: Re: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: WayAbvPar on November 30, 2005, 12:26:07 PM Harry Hamlin helped contribute to their extinction. (http://www.scifimoviepage.com/images/clash1.jpg) It is scary that I knew the story was about a giant scorpion as soon as I saw your comment. Either that or a Medusa... Damn that movie looks cheesy now, but I still love it. Title: Re: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: Nebu on November 30, 2005, 12:58:08 PM Please tell me that isn't "Clash of the Titans".
It looked so much cooler when I was a kid. Title: Re: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: Shockeye on November 30, 2005, 01:00:21 PM Please tell me that isn't "Clash of the Titans". It looked so much cooler when I was a kid. It is and it did. Title: Re: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: Pococurante on November 30, 2005, 08:05:20 PM Bah. Stop action only started meeting its match these last three to five years. Wallace & Grommit shows there's still plenty of life in the medium.
Title: Re: 1 more reason I'm glad I wasn't born 330 million years ago Post by: Samwise on November 30, 2005, 08:12:16 PM Stop action can look pretty good on its own, but it usually looks really bad if it's bluescreened into a live action shot. Especially if the framerate on the stop action is lower, or they screw up the lighting, or both (like in most old movies where it's used heavily), because the difference is visually jarring.
|