Title: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: stray on November 02, 2005, 11:47:57 PM Ahem...This is all pretty useless, but I just had to share these.
Tell me, am I wrong for thinking Picture #3 is funny? (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/pitbullvsbull1.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/pitbullvsbull2.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/pitbullvsbull3.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/pitbullvsbull4.jpg) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Der Helm on November 03, 2005, 03:13:33 AM Tell me, am I wrong for thinking Picture #3 is funny? No. It IS funny. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Murgos on November 03, 2005, 06:00:52 AM Bull baiting, pretty popular for the last 2 or 3 thousand years, seems to have quieted down recently though.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Pococurante on November 03, 2005, 10:57:33 AM The perfect use for pitbulls.
As much as I love dogs I would happily pull the lever that made every residential pitbull disappear into an alternate dimension. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 03, 2005, 11:12:17 AM God damn it. I want to see those fucking pussyass pitbulls go up against a bull with horns.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 03, 2005, 12:11:59 PM I'm upset. Are they dead? :-(
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 03, 2005, 12:30:38 PM Goddamn better be.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Mr_PeaCH on November 03, 2005, 12:45:47 PM Off-hand, judging from photo #2 mainly, either that bull is extremely large or those pit-bulls are puppies.
Still funny though. /shrug A photo study in futility if you will. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Daeven on November 03, 2005, 07:11:29 PM I'm upset. Are they dead? :-( They've been stepped on by a 2000lb bull. What do you think?Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 03, 2005, 07:14:06 PM I'm upset. Are they dead? :-( They've been stepped on by a 2000lb bull. What do you think?I think you people are nasty ! Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Fabricated on November 03, 2005, 07:29:44 PM I saw that last week, and I want to know the story behind those pictures.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: stray on November 03, 2005, 08:04:43 PM I saw that last week, and I want to know the story behind those pictures. I heard they were taken by a military photographer during the Katrina aftermath. Can't verify it or come up with anything myself though. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: stray on November 03, 2005, 08:50:37 PM Oh, and by the way, if you take it upon yourself to do the research and try to find out the story behind this, try not to use words like "dog", "Katrina", or "aftermath" in Google Image Search.
In some cases, there is plenty that I can be "upset" about just as much as Signe. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 06, 2005, 03:12:22 PM This (http://www.kxan.com/Global/story.asp?S=4080152) is why I have no pity for the dead pitbulls pictured above. Now if the bull could just do the same to their owner, the world would be that much of a better place.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 06, 2005, 03:32:45 PM Nope, not gonna click on that ... God only knows what you're willing to burn my eyes with to make a point. I'm much less upset when the owner of a dog who has taught it to be a killer suffers than the dog... needless to say. I don't believe people should teach dogs to attack with intent to harm. I don't believe people should domesticate wolves or allow wolves and dogs to breed... especially since in many places if puppies are found to be part wolf, they destroy them all according to their laws. I don't believe that people should mix breeds to create the most aggressive dog they can... such as the popular mix of Rottweiller, Mastiff and Pitbull. I think those people should be invited to spend some time in our fine jails and fined so much they can hardly afford to live and never be allowed to own an animal again. I also believe that a large dog that shows aggression and the inclination to harm people should be destroyed. I had an aggressive dog once... never again. So I'm not some sort of PETA nutter or anything.
I just don't like looking at dead things much. It makes me cry. :cry: Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 06, 2005, 03:55:28 PM Nope, not gonna click on that ... God only knows what you're willing to burn my eyes with to make a point. Oh, c'mon sig. It's just a print article. Quote Pit bulls attack six people, terrorize neighborhood; child critically injured CARY, Ill. A ten-year-old boy is in critical condition a day after three pit bulls escaped from a home in Cary, Illinois, and went on a rampage. Authorities say the pit bulls attacked several people before police shot and killed the dogs. No charges have been filed, but McHenry County Sheriff Keith Nygren says a criminal investigation is under way. Neighbors say the attacks started late Saturday afternoon when children going door-to-door for a fund-raiser arrived at the home of the man who owned the dogs. Police say the pit bulls attacked the two children, and when the dogs' owner tried to stop them, the dogs turned on him and bit off his thumb. The boy's father tried to protect his son and was attacked. The dogs went after another neighbor as well. Residents threw rocks at the dogs and honked car horns to try to distract them before police arrived and shot the animals. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 06, 2005, 05:34:21 PM Oh, ok... I thought maybe it was more dead stuff. :-) I forgive you.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: stray on November 06, 2005, 06:12:17 PM I do like wolves, but it's an even crazier idea than raising killer pitbulls. Pitbulls aren't shit in comparison (either in ferocity or potential/strength). Additionally, a wolf doesn't even need to be trained that way in order to be hostile.
As for crossbreeds, there was one guy I knew who had a half-wolf for awhile, and that thing could be friendly one day and really aggressive the next. He had him for several years since a pup, and then one day, the dog even turned on him. It was chained up at the time, and the dog still hurt him pretty bad. Needless to say, he put it to sleep. I didn't know him all that well though, and I wonder what I never saw and how exactly he raised it. I remember watching some documentary about domesticated wolves, specifically halfwolves, and many owners never had these problems with them. That a halfbreed could be raised almost like any other dog. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: stray on November 06, 2005, 06:23:23 PM Some interesting guidelines here (http://www.wolftrust.org.uk/raisingawolf.html). That one would have to go through all of this trouble is evidence enough of the negativity of it, I guess.
Quote So You Want To Raise A Wolf (or Wolfdog)? Deliberate well on the actualities of raising a wolf - which equally applies to raising wolfdogs - before you think of getting a wolf as a pet. Just a few considerations are: Legality Many countries, states and local regions have their own particular laws governing the keeping of wolves. Find out about the laws which relate to your area. You may need a licence. Neighbours Before you make a move it is a good idea to consult your neighbours. They may object strongly to howling and perceived danger. Only one wolf? You should raise at least two wolves as they need the company of their own species and may well develop behaviour problems if raised as singletons. Of course, two wolves doubles your costs and work load. Partners & helpers You should enlist helpers, of both sexes, because you cannot raise cubs alone. At least have a caring partner who is as much accepted by the cubs and as committed as you are. Your partner should take care of the wolves when you are around and also carry on if you are incapacitated or disappear (eg hospitalised, imprisoned, die) so that your wolves are not abandoned to fate. The new-born You will have to take your cubs from their mother at two weeks of age (cruel for the mother if these are her only cubs). Later than this is too late as the wolves will never socialise properly to human society. Bathing You must constantly swab your cubs' bottoms to empty their anal sacs and to stimulate them to relieve themselves. At their age they cannot relieve themselves without help. There mother would naturally do this herself by licking them. Food Exotic animals have special nutritional needs that are difficult for the average pet owner to meet. Your cubs must be bottle fed around the clock for two weeks, then weaned on a diet of high quality meat. An adult wolf needs 1 to 2.5 kg (2 to 5 lbs) of quality meat daily along with bones, skin and fur. Ordinary pet food is inadequate. Handling You have to know the proper way to handle a wolf cub. Doing the wrong thing can make incurable problems in later life. For example: Dogs Organise well controlled meetings with dogs a few times a week. This will help prevent your cubs fearing dogs when adult. Having dogs as company will also help prevent them completely imprinting on humans. If they imprint on humans they will tend to devote their attention to people instead of their own kind. People Organise people of both genders and different ages to be with your cubs so that the cubs can approach and inspect them (not the other way around). This must be on the cubs' home ground so that they are not afraid and can withdraw to a refuge to get away from people if necessary. Leash & Muzzle Train your cubs at the right time to wear a leash and muzzle - and make the experience pleasurable for them. Always use a pleasant experience as a reward when they do what you want. (Never use punishment - this applies to any dog or animal.) Whether cub or adult, never let your wolves run about without a leash or they may grow to hate restraint and control. You never know if you may need to use a muzzle some time. Housing The minimum housing recommend by the American Zoological Association (modified by any local law) for one large canid is an enclosure of 4m x 4m (12 x 12 ft), ie 16 sq metres (150 square ft), increased by 50% for each additional canid. Fences must be at least 2m (6 ft) high and need an overhang at the top, to prevent jumping out, and an inside skirt buried below ground, to prevent tunnelling. You should use chain link or equivalent and may need a pair of gates (so that one gate is always closed for security). You may also need an outer perimeter fence at least 2m (6 ft) high and about that distance from the main fence to prevent people, especially children, getting a shock if they try poking their fingers through the primary fence. Exercise You cannot duplicate the wolf's territorial needs; nevertheless your wolves will need abundant exercise that exceeds the average dog's demand. Do not keep your wolf in a village, town or city; you both need room for manoeuvre. Learning & Relationships Keep in mind what (you think) your wolves are learning and that wolves never stop leaning. You must always ensure that your wolves know they are subordinate to you when they are adult. Should your adult wolves seriously attack and injure you (eg if they try to be dominant), you must carry on your relationship; if you think you cannot then you should not consider getting a wolf in the first place. 15 Years Your commitment has to last up to fifteen years, for that is how long wolves can live in captivity. Remember: a wolf is for life. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Sky on November 07, 2005, 06:38:47 AM My band had a wolf for a while. Could never housebreak that pissing fucker. The Akida kept him in line, those are some incredibly great dogs. But the wolf was pretty tame because we got it young and it knew it's place in the order, saw the band as its pack. One annoying thing was every time it heard a siren, it'd howl. I thought it was cool, actually...the neighbors, not so much. Was great when we'd be jamming in the studio, when the singer'd hit a high note, you could hear the wolf howling outside, too.
That article is funny - high quality meats only, heh. Because wolves in the wild are only hunting Grade A Prime. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: RhyssaFireheart on November 07, 2005, 06:47:16 AM Quote Pit bulls attack six people, terrorize neighborhood; child critically injured CARY, Ill. ... Freaky thing about this is that my husband and I were eating dinner in the local tavern in Cary that evening. He took me to a bar next to the train station there and while we were eating we heard the sirens. Going by the two local papers - Daily Herald and the Chicago Tribune - one said the dogs were pit bulls and the other wouldn't/couldn't identify a breed, but according to neighbors, the dogs weren't a problem prior to this. They were confined in the house and got out when the kids came by. It doesn't sound like a breed issue, more like a territorial issue to me. Any dog that becomes territorial for any reason can be aggressive. Hell, my dad was a letter carrier for 18 years and while he managed to avoid being bitten, it was a close thing in a few cases apparently. I still boggle over him telling us about an agressive St. Bernard that tried to get at him over a fence. We owned Saints and trying to wrap our brains around one of those big couch potatoes being aggressive... couldn't do it. Anyways, dogs aren't inherently aggressive or mean. It's all in how they are raised and taught that brings out the best or worst in them. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 07, 2005, 07:26:12 AM Which is why I don't mind seeing the owners of dogs trained to hurt, hurt themselves. It's despicable what some people do. Wolves, however, remain unpredictable even when domesticated. Those sorts of things haven't been bred out of them. One of the reasons most wolves are difficult to housebreak is because of their overwhelming urge to mark territory... it's also one of the reasons they can become suddenly aggressive.
My dad was a letter carrier for about 20 years, too, by the way, and has had some close calls. :-) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 07, 2005, 09:03:13 AM Freaky thing about this is that my husband and I were eating dinner in the local tavern in Cary that evening. He took me to a bar next to the train station there and while we were eating we heard the sirens. That is freaky, rhyssa! Also freaky: there was a murder suicide in my apartment complex this weekend... in the building right next to ours no less! :-o http://news8austin.com/content/top_stories/default.asp?ArID=149181 I've heard rumors that it was a couple in their 60's... very odd. Anyway. Carry on. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: WayAbvPar on November 07, 2005, 10:57:14 AM Quote still boggle over him telling us about an agressive St. Bernard that tried to get at him over a fence. We owned Saints and trying to wrap our brains around one of those big couch potatoes being aggressive... couldn't do it. (http://okladki-divx.neostrada.pl/covers/c/cujo.jpg) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 07, 2005, 12:31:14 PM IMHO Cujo woulda been a lot more fucking scary if it had been a wolf hybrid or a pit bull.
St. Bernard's are just too fluffy, even if they are the size of a VW Bug. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 07, 2005, 12:37:14 PM The two years I worked at Taos Ski Valley (a gazillion years ago) St. Bernard's were very popular, of course. They always are in ski areas. I was surprised at how aggressive some of them were.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: WayAbvPar on November 07, 2005, 01:26:54 PM IMHO Cujo woulda been a lot more fucking scary if it had been a wolf hybrid or a pit bull. St. Bernard's are just too fluffy, even if they are the size of a VW Bug. I think that was why they used a Saint Bernard- something that cute and snuggly becoming a killing machine is kinda terrifying. See Pet Sematary for further examples- cute cat and later cute kid go quite bad. Plus, the Bernard was probably easier to train/keep in line. I can't imagine what the insurance rates would be for filming with a pitbull or wolf hybrid :-P Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 07, 2005, 05:36:13 PM I think I'm going to fire up the dv cam and shoot Cujo II: The Whitening... using my 1 year old westie...
ROWR!!!!!! (http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y131/jwjones79/IMG_0786.jpg) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 07, 2005, 07:41:01 PM eek!
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 08, 2005, 04:02:24 AM Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Murgos on November 08, 2005, 05:29:05 AM My uncle had a wolf - husky mix. Nicest dog I ever knew.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Bunk on November 08, 2005, 11:34:38 AM I understand the hate for pitbulls, and yes pic 3 is damn funny, but a dead dog is a sad thing, period.
People raising dogs residentially to be viscous should just be shot. People selling pitbulls to people that will raise them that way should also be shot. My sister has a two year old pitbull/rottie cross named Harley. He's cuter than a straight pitbull, but still very intimidating looking. He's also a world class suck. Yes, he can fetch a log that outweighs him out of the ocean with ease, but this dog doesn't have a mean bone in his body. Because he was raised properly. He hasn't quite figured out that he's a bit too big to sleep on your lap though, still does it whenever you let him. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Pococurante on November 08, 2005, 11:42:47 AM There's no shortage of evidence certain breeds are inherently unstable regardless of their upbringing/training. Pits are definitely near if not at the top of that list.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 08, 2005, 12:01:54 PM This is the dog my sister and I rescued from a shelter.
(http://img433.imageshack.us/img433/4851/02lokiweb1bj.jpg) Yes, she is apparently the tiniest pitbull in existence. She's the smartest dog I've ever seen... and we used to own Alsatians which are very, very smart. She's terribly silly and immensely entertaining. She would only bite you if you bit her first... and probably not even then. Don't be fooled, however, pitbulls are often bred to be aggressive. Same with chows, and some other breeds, but any breed can be aggressive It has a lot to do with the sort of training a dog has, but also you have to factor in what sorts of traits were concentrated on when breeding a dog. It's not all that difficult to breed unwanted traits out, however. (my mother used to breed German Shepherds/Alsatians) Unneutered male dogs bite the most and children under 10 are the most bit. If I were the parent of a small child, I would be very careful what sort of breed to get. I have had dogs that I felt I loved as if they were a family member. If that dog were to show aggressive tendencies towards humans and if I were not able to have that corrected through training, I would have that dog destroyed in spite of how much it hurt me. Regardless of how much of a silly person I might appear to be, I do have my head screwed on properly when it comes to things like this. So yes... if I had to worry that an animal I owned and loved dearly was capable of seriously harming an human I didn't know and could care less about as an individual, I would have the animal put to sleep before I would chance a tragic accident. This thread makes me sad. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Pococurante on November 08, 2005, 12:11:28 PM She has a sweet face.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: RhyssaFireheart on November 08, 2005, 06:20:29 PM I think I'm going to fire up the dv cam and shoot Cujo II: The Whitening... using my 1 year old westie... ROWR!!!!!! I'll see your ROWR!!!!!! and raise you this! (http://coeurdefeu.com/hosted/caymancrazy.jpg) *sigh* Digital cameras can be too damn slow sometimes. Signe, your dog looks like a sweetie all the way. Cujo - I hated that fucking movie. It got to be so annoying when we'd take our Saint somewhere as kids and people would come up going "Oh look, it's CUJO!" No it's not, if he were Cujo he'd be trying to tear your fucking head off, moron. His name is Barney (and/or Max). We used to get it with both the Saints we owned. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Furiously on November 10, 2005, 12:16:18 PM This is the dog my sister and I rescued from a shelter. (http://img433.imageshack.us/img433/4851/02lokiweb1bj.jpg) Yes, she is apparently the tiniest pitbull in existence. She's the smartest dog I've ever seen... and we used to own Alsatians which are very, very smart. She's terribly silly and immensely entertaining. She would only bite you if you bit her first... and probably not even then. Don't be fooled, however, pitbulls are often bred to be aggressive. Same with chows, and some other breeds, but any breed can be aggressive It has a lot to do with the sort of training a dog has, but also you have to factor in what sorts of traits were concentrated on when breeding a dog. It's not all that difficult to breed unwanted traits out, however. (my mother used to breed German Shepherds/Alsatians) Unneutered male dogs bite the most and children under 10 are the most bit. If I were the parent of a small child, I would be very careful what sort of breed to get. I have had dogs that I felt I loved as if they were a family member. If that dog were to show aggressive tendencies towards humans and if I were not able to have that corrected through training, I would have that dog destroyed in spite of how much it hurt me. Regardless of how much of a silly person I might appear to be, I do have my head screwed on properly when it comes to things like this. So yes... if I had to worry that an animal I owned and loved dearly was capable of seriously harming an human I didn't know and could care less about as an individual, I would have the animal put to sleep before I would chance a tragic accident. This thread makes me sad. Me too - one of my good friends has a pitbull that is the biggest pussycat in the world. Extremely gentle and loving dog. (They have a 2 month old and a 2 year old and I've seen the 2 year old pull themselves up from the ground grabbing the dog's face). Then again, we had a german shepard as a kid that was the same way, unless you were a stranger who was wearing a hat or black. Then she would go into Cujo mode. (Note - there was no training for either of these.) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: CaptainNapkin on November 10, 2005, 12:17:44 PM I agree with you Signe, "this thread makes me sad" as well. I was reading through it and about ready for a hot-headed reply, but I'm happy that you posted what you did, in a nice calm way that I'd probably be incapable of myself.
All the anti-pitbull (or anti-any breed) crap is all because people just jump on the media hype and accept it as fact without seeing the real picture. So yeah.. the video games are murder simulators... kids shoot other kids, must be because kids are inherently evil and violent, I say we ban kids! See what a wonderful thought process. I'm not saying there are not evil dogs out there, but it has nothing to do with the breed. I'm not just the spokesperson... I'm also a client... Look how horribly mean mine is... cramming his 75lb ass into the small crate so his main squeeze can sleep in the bigger one... (http://www.saboism.com/files/pics/clutch_stuffed01.jpg) Yes, he's an idiot... but he does crap like this that keeps me laughing... he's a big baby. No, he's not propped up or set up in this pic either (http://www.saboism.com/files/pics/clutch2.jpg). (I admit, I threw this one in for comedic value only) Anyway, don't believe what ya read... if I made no sense it's because this topic ticks me off... for every story or pic of a dog tragedy, there are countless others of happiness... those, of course, are not newsworthy. :heartbreak: And yes, I've seen some of the bad ones. I've had friends with dogs that were trained for fighting. Those dogs need to be put to sleep, and the owners lined up and shot, on TV, primetime. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: kaid on November 10, 2005, 01:16:56 PM I will agree that a lot of a dogs behavior is how they are trained or not trained but pitbulls like it or not are a very agressive by nature breed. If trained well this can be trained out of them mostly but even the best trained ones still can be very dangerous.
My friend had a pitbull and a german shepherd. They used to love eachother and play all the time. Until one day for no reason we could ever figure out the pitbull freaked out and litterally ripped the shepherd to pieces. The pitbull tore the sheperds throat out and pretty much eviscerated it. And this was from a good tempered well trained pitbull that I had never so much as heard growl at anything before and I cannot to this day figure out what caused it to flip and slaughter his playmate. kaid Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: CaptainNapkin on November 10, 2005, 02:09:12 PM I respectfully disagree, pitbulls are not aggressive by nature. One unfortunate incident does not represent and entire breed. Your experience could have happened with ANY dog. The thing is, if it's a pitbull that gets aggressive, it's ugly because of their power. They are just strong and capable animals.
Petey's heart is broken... (http://www.saboism.com/files/pics/petey.jpg) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Toast on November 10, 2005, 02:36:50 PM I hate pit bulls. It's crazy how many pit bull mixes there are in the animal shelter here in Austin.
I prefer my pets to be non-lethal. If my dog does go postal because something or someone freaks it out, it's nice to only have to worry about "did it break the skin?" Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Bunk on November 10, 2005, 04:03:21 PM The problem with pitbulls is the breeders that continue to breed them. I would not complain if we essentially bred the species in to muttdom, simply because we really don't have a need of a dog with that much power and destructive capabilities in today's world.
That being said, it's still unfair to direct the hate at the dogs themselves. Its sure as hell not thier fault. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 10, 2005, 04:33:21 PM I hate pit bulls. It's crazy how many pit bull mixes there are in the animal shelter here in Austin. I prefer my pets to be non-lethal. If my dog does go postal because something or someone freaks it out, it's nice to only have to worry about "did it break the skin?" I lolled... halfway through reading that first sentence, I was already saying to myself, "Self, I wonder where he's talking about. Sounds like Austin." Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Miasma on November 10, 2005, 05:14:00 PM All the anti-pitbull (or anti-any breed) crap is all because people just jump on the media hype and accept it as fact without seeing the real picture. I saw several real pictures at the beginning of the thread, they are of two pitbulls vicious and crazy enough to try and kill a bull.Half of the pitbull stories I have heard involve terrible owners, the other half are like Kaid's story where one suddenly snaps for no reason. It doesn't matter how cute and nice they seem to be right now because they can turn on you at any moment. I'm sure all pitbull owners say things like "they are great with my kids", right up until the baby is mauled. (http://www.newsnet5.com/news/4184524/detail.html?subid=22100405&qs=1;bp=t) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Paelos on November 10, 2005, 09:31:34 PM There are dead dogs in a picture and amazingly this didn't end up in the den. Hey mods, that's pretty sick.
Next it'll be hey look at all the happy kittens drowning. Fuckers. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Merusk on November 10, 2005, 09:44:49 PM There are dead dogs in a picture and amazingly this didn't end up in the den. Hey mods, that's pretty sick. Next it'll be hey look at all the happy kittens drowning. Fuckers. It's ok because they're evil dogs and the world would be better off without them. Like the Irish. All the anti-pitbull (or anti-any breed) crap is all because people just jump on the media hype and accept it as fact without seeing the real picture. I saw several real pictures at the beginning of the thread, they are of two pitbulls vicious and crazy enough to try and kill a bull.Hi. Welcome to the "bull" part of "Bull Terrier." Bulldog History. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldog) Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: RhyssaFireheart on November 11, 2005, 12:12:09 AM Hi. Welcome to the "bull" part of "Bull Terrier." Bulldog History. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldog) I think this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull) might have been the link you were looking for, although the other is relevent for the history of the orgin breed for pit bulls. And while it's sad that the dogs ended up dead, if the rumour someone else mentioned - that they were strays after Katrina - wouldn't you be getting a bit desperate for food if you were in their paws? Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: stray on November 11, 2005, 04:04:13 AM I only made the post because Picture #3 was funny in a Loony Toons sort of way. It has nothing to do with hating pitbulls or wanting to shoot kittens.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Merusk on November 11, 2005, 06:18:48 AM Hi. Welcome to the "bull" part of "Bull Terrier." Bulldog History. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldog) I think this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull) might have been the link you were looking for, although the other is relevent for the history of the orgin breed for pit bulls. Whoops.. clicked the english bulldog link then ripped the link without hitting the back button. Anywho, yeah, Pitbull History is doing exactly that type of thing and Bulldogs (their ancestors) were bred for Bull Baiting. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: HaemishM on November 11, 2005, 08:36:18 AM It wasn't immediately clear to me in the pictures that the pitbulls were dead. No exposed viscera and such.
And really, the #3 pic was really fucking funny. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Pococurante on November 11, 2005, 01:48:10 PM From the Wikipedia link for pitbulls:
Quote Statistics Of the 199 dog-attack fatalities in the USA between 1979 and 1996, dogs identified as pit bulls were responsible for 60 attacks—just under a third. The next most-dangerous group was Rottweilers, responsible for 29 attacks (statistics from the CDC). According to The Age, pit bull terriers have been responsible for four of the seven dog attacks in which Australians have died between 1991 and 2002. The Endangered Dog Breeds Association of Australia denies these figures, claiming that pit bull terriers have caused no known fatalities. Most Australian state governments have introduced new legislation specific to pit bulls. While the numbers are relatively small it's inescapable that these perfect pets occasionally are the ultimate nightmare and of all dogs the most likely to snap. I view having one around the house exactly the same as I view being a gun owner without a gunsafe. This quote made me chuckle: Quote Although they are short, they have extremely high muscle density and are generally capable of executing a standing four foot vertical jump. I saw this one time - damn dog literally levitated straight up four feet and landed on a ramp we were using to load out furniture. We used to play "fetch the stick" by throwing a four-foot very heavy log and the dog would catch it in mid-air/mid-run without even ducking his head. The owners had to put him down once he got older - his wife made him as she no longer felt the kids were safe. I agree with her - damn things scared the hell out of me. Sweet dog when he was younger though. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Merusk on November 11, 2005, 05:25:27 PM From the Wikipedia link for pitbulls: Quote Statistics Of the 199 dog-attack fatalities in the USA between 1979 and 1996, dogs identified as pit bulls were responsible for 60 attacks—just under a third. The next most-dangerous group was Rottweilers, responsible for 29 attacks (statistics from the CDC). According to The Age, pit bull terriers have been responsible for four of the seven dog attacks in which Australians have died between 1991 and 2002. The Endangered Dog Breeds Association of Australia denies these figures, claiming that pit bull terriers have caused no known fatalities. Most Australian state governments have introduced new legislation specific to pit bulls. While the numbers are relatively small it's inescapable that these perfect pets occasionally are the ultimate nightmare and of all dogs the most likely to snap. I view having one around the house exactly the same as I view being a gun owner without a gunsafe. I found similar numbers just googling around, but then found another study for the same time period that indicated that among non-fatal dog bites, Shepards and then Chows are the most likely to bite. They didn't mention Rotts or Pitts in that study, though, so it makes you wonder what's up with it. (I was looking for info on Dalmations, which I'd heard are fairly neurotic and also prone to biting due to inbreeding.. no place mentioned them. Also interesting the much-feared Dobe was lower on bites and fatalities than the "friendly" Shephard or Malamute) All it leads me to believe is that having any kind of powerful dog when you have young kids just isn't among the best of ideas. Particularly if you had the dog first, since it'll try and establish dominance at some point. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Margalis on November 11, 2005, 07:56:51 PM It wasn't immediately clear to me in the pictures that the pitbulls were dead. No exposed viscera and such. In one of the pictures the dog lying on the ground in the foreground appears to have a large pool of blood around the head. Doesn't look like a shadow, too dark and you can see the shadow of the dog and the person off-frame going into the frame whereas the blood is coming towards the camera. Last night I broke into my landlord's apartment with a screwdriver in about 15 seconds. (She asked me too, locked herself out) I think I have a career as some sort of super-sleuth. CSI, here I come! Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 12, 2005, 04:09:39 PM Last night I broke into my landlord's apartment with a screwdriver in about 15 seconds. (She asked me too, locked herself out) I think I have a career as some sort of super-sleuth. CSI, here I come! Or a crook. I probably wouldn't have a Pitbull as a pet if I had small children. Or a Rottweiller, Chow Chow, Mastiff, Akita or any number of other dogs. If I owned one and had a baby, I would probably find it another home. I think people just need to use common sense... if there is the slightest chance that an animal of mine could hurt a person because of an unpredictable nature, it would have to be put to sleep. I wouldn't even try to find that sort of an animal a home. By law, a dog is a possession... like a blender or a gun. :-) If something is in my possession and kills or even hurts a person, I'm responsible. Sorry... I don't want that sort of responsibility. It's not just because I could be tossed in jail, either. I had a dog who bit my nephew in the face when he was only three. The bite was't serious but it could have been. I still have nightmares about it sometimes. I want my animals to be just like me... all bark, no bite. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: kaid on November 14, 2005, 09:39:20 AM I can believe that a malamute would be higher on the fatality list than dobermans. My god if a malamute wanted to kick your ass you are smoked those things are freaking huge. Most malamutes I have seen are very even tempered but the males especially un neutered ones really need to be trained well or there can be dominance issues.
kaid Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Sky on November 14, 2005, 11:24:16 AM I dated a girl with one of those monstrosities once. I was very scared, glad we broke up far away from her house.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 14, 2005, 12:01:53 PM I got to meet a 190 lb. Irish Wolfhound at the austin celtic festival last weekend. Was pretty spiffy. Huge dog but oddly nonthreatening. :-D
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Bunk on November 14, 2005, 02:54:16 PM This quote made me chuckle: Quote Although they are short, they have extremely high muscle density and are generally capable of executing a standing four foot vertical jump. I saw this one time - damn dog literally levitated straight up four feet and landed on a ramp we were using to load out furniture. We used to play "fetch the stick" by throwing a four-foot very heavy log and the dog would catch it in mid-air/mid-run without even ducking his head. The owners had to put him down once he got older - his wife made him as she no longer felt the kids were safe. I agree with her - damn things scared the hell out of me. Sweet dog when he was younger though. My sister's Rottie/Pit can clear a four foot fence like it isn't there. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: kaid on November 15, 2005, 02:52:04 PM Wolfhounds are pussycats those things are immense but due to that just don't seem to think of much as a threat to them. A game store owner around here used to have one. The thing when it was a puppy was over 100 pounds hehe YIKES. Nice dog though very quite but he like to snuggle with people and when you have a 180+ pound dog leaning on you it can be a bit much.
kaid Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Kenrick on November 27, 2005, 06:27:50 PM Exhibit 4,213,673(b):
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/27/D8E5326O0.html Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: voodoolily on November 28, 2005, 10:05:01 AM Most of the dogs I've ever liked were either tiny (what I deem to be leash-trainable cats) or ginormous. I think Borzois are beautiful, but they're infamously non-child-friendly. If I ever own a dog, I want a whippet or a mini-doberman. They're like little fairy horses! :hello_kitty:
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: kaid on November 28, 2005, 10:25:37 AM Friend has a pair of minature itallian greyhounds. Like little fairy ninja horses that steal stuff they arnt supposed to faster than your eye can follow.
Kaid Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: WayAbvPar on November 28, 2005, 12:23:01 PM Exhibit 4,213,673(b): http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/27/D8E5326O0.html They should put the owner to sleep along with the dogs. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Signe on November 28, 2005, 03:25:07 PM They should den the top part of this thread and just leave the bottom... the bottom part is beautiful. :-)
Someone should also give me back my den permissions before I start with the hobbit pr0n. :x Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Nebu on November 28, 2005, 03:32:44 PM Don't laugh, but when I worked in the ER I saw a lot of bite injuries caused by Daschunds. Apparently it's not uncommon for them to snap if you get in their face. Too many trips down the badger hole I'm guessing.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: voodoolily on November 29, 2005, 10:40:15 AM When I was a kid my Nana had a chihuahua named Bambi who was infamously impatient with children. She warned my brother and me to not tease Bambi, but my brother was relentless and one time when he was sticking out his tongue all "nyah nyah" Bambi nipped him on the tongue. Drew blood and everything. Everyone laughed because my bro totally deserved it. He never fucked with that little dog again.
Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: WayAbvPar on November 29, 2005, 11:00:12 AM Don't laugh, but when I worked in the ER I saw a lot of bite injuries caused by Daschunds. Apparently it's not uncommon for them to snap if you get in their face. Too many trips down the badger hole I'm guessing. Daschunds are mean little fuckers. There was one up the street from my house when I was a kid that used to terrify me...it would come charging out of its yard and bark like hell, trying to nip at me. One day, I had had enough. I picked up a handful of sand and gravel; when the little bastard got close enough in its charge, I threw it right in its face. It yelped, turned around, and ran like hell back to its yard. I am guessing the sand got into its beady little eyes. Never left its yard in pursuit of me again, although it did continue to bark. Title: Re: Pitbulls vs Bull Post by: Pococurante on November 30, 2005, 07:57:38 PM If I was all belly and phallus with no legs to speak of I'd be damn irritable too. ;)
|