f13.net

f13.net General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Jacob0883 on September 06, 2005, 05:31:29 PM



Title: Quick Law Question
Post by: Jacob0883 on September 06, 2005, 05:31:29 PM
This question is in relation to the UCC.

Is a seller forced to make a reasonable effort to resell its good before comencing a breach of contract if the repudation was effective, but wrongful?


Title: Re: Quick Law Question
Post by: Kenrick on September 07, 2005, 05:11:05 AM
I'm sorry I can't provide an answer to your question, but I will say this:

This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass.


Title: Re: Quick Law Question
Post by: CmdrSlack on September 07, 2005, 08:40:39 AM
This question is in relation to the UCC.

Is a seller forced to make a reasonable effort to resell its good before comencing a breach of contract if the repudation was effective, but wrongful?

I've managed to forget as much about Article 2 as I've learned, but I'm going to guess that any duty to mitigate damages is, at best, going to go towards ultimate damages that can be claimed, not the timing of filing a lawsuit.  If you repudiate, IIRC, outside of a few situations, that is a breach, effective or no, wrongful or no.

I could be totally wrong, I don't do much UCC work.