Title: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: DraconianOne on February 03, 2014, 02:32:01 PM I hate myself for even starting this thread but I feel duty bound to point out that the Superb Owl teaser for Transformers 4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F33PCUTWPk) has Optimus Prime riding on Grimlock's back.
(http://screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Transformers-4-Grimlock-Optimus-Prime-570x294.jpg) I hate myself more because, despite loathing the first three films, I find myself looking at that and thinking "Fuck yeah!" But I'll no doubt end up finding it as fucking awful as the ones that came before and then hate myself for wasting two hours of my life. Quote from: Michael Bay With this trailer, I feed people hope to poison their souls. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Evildrider on February 03, 2014, 06:44:22 PM At least Mark Wahlberg is leaps and bounds better than Shia Ledouche and Megan Fox combined.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Lakov_Sanite on February 04, 2014, 05:50:23 AM As long as he's fighting evil giant robots and not trees.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: shiznitz on February 04, 2014, 07:27:48 AM At least Mark Wahlberg is leaps and bounds better than Shia Ledouche and Megan Fox combined. You insult Mr Wahlberg by even suggesting anyone anywhere could even imagine he isn't better than at least THREE people combined. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Riggswolfe on February 06, 2014, 08:08:07 AM I genuinely enjoyed most of the first Transformers movie. There were parts that made me wince but in general it was fun, in particular I like the scene where Bumblebee calls down the other autobots and they come down as meteors. That scene was very well made.
The 2nd movie was god awful. The script wasn't totally their fault as I think there was a writer's strike but the directing and editing were awful as well. The third movie had some good moments but was still pretty bad. It was better than the 2nd movie but still not in anyway a good movie. What would make these movies 1000000X better is to reduce the roles the humans play by 80%, redesign the robots so they are easily distinguishable (say what you want about how the 80s versions have aged but you can tell at a glance which character is which, I find that difficult to do in these movies with the exception of Optimus) and get Michael Bay's editor to stop taking cocaine long enough to get over his addiction to quick cuts during fights. None of that will happen in this movie so at best it will be tolerable. In no way, shape, or form will I pay to see this in the theater or even VOD. I'll wait for Netflix. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: TheWalrus on February 06, 2014, 12:16:47 PM I will throw on my eyepatch and park my ship in a bay.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on February 06, 2014, 12:38:24 PM First one really wasn't THAT bad. It's just it was a real launchpad for the other two which were, frankly, keech.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: K9 on February 06, 2014, 03:02:44 PM Agreed, the first one was dumb, but it was dumb in a fun way that wasn't overly insulting to anyone with above-potato intelligence. Two was dire, I haven't even seen the third all the way through I think (if I did I have purged the memory).
I'm not rushing to see this one. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: KallDrexx on February 06, 2014, 08:27:18 PM I will say one good thing about #2, they had a few really awesome robot vs robot fight scenes that did not switch cameras often. In the first movie a lot of the fights involved a LOT of camera switching for each fight action. In the 2nd (at least in the optimus battle) they stayed on a single camera for a good 10-20 seconds which (imo) made the fight look better.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ard on February 06, 2014, 10:27:58 PM I'm going to say it. I shouldn't. I'm going to anyways. I liked Transformers 3. It was hokey, it's plot was seriously wtf, Nimoy was just odd, but fuck it, it focused mostly on the robots. It's what I wanted Transformers 1 to be. Transformers 2 however is something I wish I could take back having ever seen.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2014, 01:33:13 AM You can say it and I will defend your right to do so. However, you're not right. You're just not.
I will agree that it focused on the robots and the story COULD have been made interesting, but it just came off as 'curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.' I can't imagine there as a single kid anywhere surprised, let alone adults. Also, wasn't that the one where they were INSIDE the sideways toppling skyscraper ? I can't really remember, but it was a huge black morass of retarded. The first one worked because of all the very cool Transformers bits. The chopper landing and then wasting the base. The aforementioned meteor shower turning into goddamn robots in disguise. Starscream at the Dam. Megatron chewing scenery like he was Agent Smith or something. I could have done without some of the humans and, frankly, the scorpion under the sand was retarded, but it wasn't awful. And then we get the half naked transformer with the tongue. Jesus. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Tannhauser on February 07, 2014, 02:51:41 AM I kinda liked the first one but hated the second one so quit the series. I didn't watch Transformers when it was on, so I couldn't make out which robot was which. The action scenes in 2 were terrible, I couldn't tell what was going on. The first one I wouldn't mind watching again though.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Lakov_Sanite on February 07, 2014, 05:47:41 AM If you didn't see the third you missed the giant transformer truck nuts
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Chimpy on February 07, 2014, 06:16:33 AM If you didn't see the third you missed the giant transformer truck nuts Jesus christ why did you have to remind me? I had blanked out about 99.99% of that piece of shit and now it is storming back. :ye_gods: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Cyrrex on February 07, 2014, 06:18:23 AM Going to pick a nit here...in that pick up above, Optimus appears to be standing on or stepping over Grimlock's head. Judging by that pic alone, his volume would appear to be roughly half that of Grimlock's head. Grimlock is a T-Rex analogue of some kind, no? And Optimus a big ass truck. So in other words, I am supposed to believe that a T-Rex is something like 20 times the size of a semi truck. That, or they somehow change size when they transform. It pissed me off when the cartoon did that shit in the 80s (my brain decided to excuse Megatron for some reason), and it pisses me off now.
Or do I have some facts wrong? Biggest peeve from these movies, though, tends to be the fact that you couldn't tell the robots apart most of the time. That, combined with the editing of the fight scenes, made it look like whirling balls of scrap metal exploding for some reason. Think some of this improved slightly in the 2nd and 3rd, only to be replaced by ghettobots and leg humping decepticons. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2014, 06:26:23 AM Oh God, the ghettobots.
The Horror, the horror. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Cyrrex on February 07, 2014, 07:16:02 AM I thought of another thing that bothered the shit out of me. Devastator. There may have been some pretense (I can't clearly recall) of it being created out of a few different construction vehicle, but then it turns into some big...thing. Not a giant robot clearly made out of five individual and recognizable vehicles, but some big confusing shape that seemed to be more worm-like than humanoid shaped. Talk about a missed opportunity. Probably the thing I loved most about the Transformers back in the day were the combiners - Aerialbots, Constructicons, Stunticons and Combaticons. Seems like such low hanging fruit, if only they could do shit right, which to a large degree includes making them coherent, recognizable shapes. Let Menasor loose on London, and presto.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2014, 07:25:54 AM Nah, Devastator was used for a scrotum joke.
It was fucking lame. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ard on February 07, 2014, 07:42:44 AM You can say it and I will defend your right to do so. However, you're not right. You're just not. Why do you even care that I liked a movie? I have problems with that given my statement was completely objective. I'm able to shut my brain off for stupid shit, that's pretty easily documented over the course of my posts here. The third movie worked for me in a way that none of the others did. It's not like I'm contributing to any of this since I saw it via netflix, and I don't really have any expectations from the new movie, other than that I won't be seeing it when it comes out, much like all the rest. I was mostly just surprised that I actually liked the third movie enough to second guess myself and go back and watch the second movie, which I really regret having done. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2014, 07:44:38 AM I care that people think Tracey Emin is an artist too, if it helps.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Cyrrex on February 07, 2014, 07:54:53 AM Nah, Devastator was used for a scrotum joke. It was fucking lame. Yeah, it WAS lame. That's kinda my point. Something that should have obviously been completely awesome, and it pretty much wasn't in any way. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Hoax on February 07, 2014, 11:09:26 AM I only saw Transformers #1.
I liked the Megan Fox fixing the car scene. That one fight scene you could sort of see. When Bumblebee transformed while putting him into the driver's seat. Everything in the final fight where Megatron was being a badass plane transforming and fucking shit up and ripping bitches in half. I didn't like black transformers talking jive. The dog peeing on transformers. All of the fight scenes that were impossible to follow. How much time was wasted with the stupid FBI or whatever guy and general human interaction bullshit. How human's were relevant in fights between giant robots. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on February 07, 2014, 11:13:48 AM Well, in fairness, if you didn't like Jazz, he really got his due at the end of the film.
:ye_gods: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: TheWalrus on February 07, 2014, 02:29:32 PM That part actually sucked. I really liked Jazz as a kid. I hoped they'd find a way to revive him somehow. Don't they backup software?
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Trippy on March 05, 2014, 10:30:22 PM Latest trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubGpDoyJvmI Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Lakov_Sanite on March 06, 2014, 05:25:58 AM 'Murica!
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on March 06, 2014, 11:41:47 AM Latest trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubGpDoyJvmI That looked good. It's probably not going to be. Also, Prime's back to normal truck ? That's pretty awesome. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: NowhereMan on March 07, 2014, 09:52:39 PM I knew nothing about this and am kind of disappointed it isn't about transformers landing on pre-historic earth and just fighting each other/dinosaurs. The movie seems less ridiculous as a concept and way less interesting.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Riggswolfe on March 10, 2014, 06:48:01 AM That looked like shit. Way too much stuff with humans. Humans turn on the autobots because? Independence Day rip off saucer invasion. That guy with the shaved head is going to be the annoying scenery chewing government agent of the movie.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: SurfD on June 27, 2014, 12:24:57 AM So. Just finished watching the early bird screening at work. Was pretty much everything I expected it to be. Bigass summer blockbuster with largely paper thin plot, where lots of shit blows up.
One thing I will say. This is probably one of the few times where at least the trailers actually managed to give away almost nothing about what is going on. Pretty much everything in the trailers is simply a tease, and generally turns out to not be what you thought it was. Other then the Dinobots, who are just bigass, kickass dinosaurbots. If I had one major gripe about the move it would be: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: jgsugden on June 27, 2014, 08:21:24 AM Due to my misspent youth watching the cartoon, I've been looking for some reason to believe this would be worth watching.
Sadly, no. It isn't even going onto the end of my 200+ long Netflix disk queue. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Maven on June 27, 2014, 11:22:17 AM After reading this 500-page dissertation (http://www.scribd.com/doc/210677266/I-actually-kind-of-appreciate-the-Transformers-movies) from Something Awful on the Transformers film trilogy, painting Optimus Prime as a blood-thirsty villain and Megatron as the sympathetic hero, Sam Witwicky as an audience insert and metaphor for the ineffectual man-children Millenials, and its gushing, overwhelming love of what Dark of the Moon accomplished ...
...it provides a reasonable alternative perspective even if not all of it was intended when they made it or even an accurate analysis. However, I do like that Dark of Moon had some serious subtlety in some of its composition, and I wonder if they maintained that. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Merusk on June 27, 2014, 06:55:36 PM Just saw this with my son because he's still big into the movies. At nearly three hours make sure you hit the bathroom after the first hour. Take your kids out after the CIA is chasing Marky Mark and the funky bunch, nothing good happens there for a good 15 mins.
The pandering to China. Oh dear lord, the pandering. It was so transparent where the scenes were going to be cut and pasted to make it "Rah, Rah, Beijing" and how they were going to work it so the Chinese underling in the US version is the woman in charge in China. Dinobots don't show until the last 30-40 mins. Boo. They also set up for the 5th movie which will be Prime in Space vs. The Quintessons (though they aren't mentioned by name.) As for Megatron: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: SurfD on June 28, 2014, 01:21:27 AM As for Megatron: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Merusk on June 28, 2014, 08:51:10 AM And the turtles would have been aliens unless Hasbro said "uhh. No"
Michael Bay cares not for the rules of your silly universe. Even when they're referenced in the movie he disobeys them in. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Lakov_Sanite on June 28, 2014, 02:19:38 PM lol, lore in a michael bay movie? Hahahaha, no. Fuck, he doesn't care about continuity between his own movies and you think he'd give a fuck about anything else?
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Cyrrex on June 29, 2014, 06:59:10 AM I've been wondering why he even bothers with all the "spark" business in the first place. It is stupid as fuck, and it isn't like he cares about the lore anyway. They should just be super intelligent AIs, and just leave it at that. Just a bad plot device.
Hell, I just wish someone would make a movie about cars, trucks and planes that simply transform into robots that are still somewhat recognizable as the cars, trucks and planes that they originally came from. It was the easiest thing in the world for him to pull off, and he blew it. Sounds like he is going to blow it even more with this latest one. I don't mind the overdone explosions and the shitty plot, just make your stupid robots cool, asswipe. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Evildrider on June 29, 2014, 12:26:01 PM You want a GoBots movie?
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: dd0029 on June 29, 2014, 04:50:31 PM There were many, many huh? moments in this one. Most notable were the geographic shifts, though nothing quite like stepping out of the Smithsonian into a plane graveyard in Arizona. The one that really got me was useless boyfriend carrying around a laminated card in his wallet with the text of Texas' Romeo and Juliet law. Though Marky Mark was entertaining with most of his quips.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: SurfD on June 29, 2014, 11:28:26 PM There were many, many huh? moments in this one. Most notable were the geographic shifts, though nothing quite like stepping out of the Smithsonian into a plane graveyard in Arizona. The one that really got me was useless boyfriend carrying around a laminated card in his wallet with the text of Texas' Romeo and Juliet law. Though Marky Mark was entertaining with most of his quips. Eh, given the way Useless Girlfriend probably described her father to Useless Boyfriend, I imagine he had the card entirely because he knew he would need it as part of his "Hi, Im dating your daughter and you cant stop me" defense when the two finally met. They just met under different circumstances then originally predicted.Personally (and granted, this IS a movie about Transforming CARS), I had a good laugh at a lot of the "OMG" Product Placement "OMG", shots. Like the totally deliberate slow motion "look how sexy this car is" shot of Lockdown Transforming into a Lamborghini and rolling oh so stylishly past the smouldering metal statue of comic relief guy. Or the "Beats by Dre didnt totally pay us a shitload of money to plug the Pill there, nope." Though I did get a good kick out of Rainbow Dash. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Setanta on June 30, 2014, 01:24:56 AM If you didn't see the third you missed the giant transformer truck nuts Truck nuts nothing - I'm hoping Bay hasn't seen this: (http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--wIlIIm-o--/17e84rl2hbm28gif.gif) Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on June 30, 2014, 03:50:33 AM That's shopped.
:awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Threash on July 03, 2014, 08:06:18 PM Nicola Peltz is the most perfect human being that has ever existed and her mere presence in this movie makes it a masterpiece for the ages.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Merusk on July 04, 2014, 07:49:03 AM I disagree. Made me uncomfortable since she was being so sexualized and was clearly meant to be under 18 as that was a "plot" point.
Doesn't help that my own daughter is only a year younger than her character was meant to be. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: HaemishM on July 04, 2014, 09:39:10 AM Doesn't help that my own daughter is only a year younger than her character was meant to be. Sucks ass ogling a hottie and realizing that chick isn't half your age. :uhrr: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ginaz on July 04, 2014, 09:55:35 PM Doesn't help that my own daughter is only a year younger than her character was meant to be. Sucks ass ogling a hottie and realizing that chick isn't half your age. :uhrr: I sometimes feel like an old perv ogling 25 year olds. :ye_gods: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ironwood on July 05, 2014, 03:03:32 AM Yeah, if you're going to start worrying now that we're all advancing well into senility, you might as well just give up.
That said, it bothers me sometimes that my younger male friends will point out someone as 'gorgeous' who just looks like she needs tucked up in her bed and a story read to her. :heartbreak: Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Merusk on July 05, 2014, 11:29:54 AM Elena's still under 10. It gets so much worse, man.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: angry.bob on July 05, 2014, 09:11:06 PM Nicola Peltz is the most perfect human being that has ever existed and her mere presence in this movie makes it a masterpiece for the ages. Eh, after the hour mark she just looked like some rancid tart who just finished up some particularly rough trade. Maybe it was me but Marky Mark and her didn't look more than 5 or so years apart. they really needed someone younger looking for that role. Yeah, I know that teen girls look like that now, but it was just way too distracting in the movie. Also, I did not know this thing was 3 hours long. I bought my 7yo a large drink and he guzzled it down since he isn't allowed soda except at movies. Luckily there wasn't enough of a plot to have missed anything going to the bathroom. I still haven't figured out how this movie was 3 hours yet had a plot that would fit on a cocktail napkin while at the same time explained almost nothing. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: rk47 on July 08, 2014, 02:24:45 AM Watched this.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Hoax on July 09, 2014, 10:11:54 AM :Love_Letters:
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Sir T on July 09, 2014, 11:59:30 AM Marry Me.
Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: kaid on July 09, 2014, 12:06:25 PM There were many, many huh? moments in this one. Most notable were the geographic shifts, though nothing quite like stepping out of the Smithsonian into a plane graveyard in Arizona. The one that really got me was useless boyfriend carrying around a laminated card in his wallet with the text of Texas' Romeo and Juliet law. Though Marky Mark was entertaining with most of his quips. I can almost see some 20 year old doof dating a 16/17 year old girl doing that though wave it in a cops face if he catches you with your hand up her shirt. Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: rk47 on July 20, 2014, 08:56:39 PM CALLING ALL AUTOBOT
CALLING ALL AUTOBOT CALLING ALL AUTOBOT Title: Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction Post by: Ratman_tf on September 04, 2014, 07:22:39 PM Since my epic return from the outer reaches, I thought I'd post my opinion on this latest TF movie, since I've ranted about the others in the past.
I didn't watch it. Fuck you Michael Bay. (http://tilallaremine.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/hoist-goes-hollywood.jpg) |