Title: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on May 15, 2013, 11:43:41 AM First trailer here. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tDxDEjDMreA)
Loved Pitch Black and even liked Chronicles of Riddick, but I'm glad that this is closer to the former than the latter. Looks pretty good imo. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 11:47:40 AM OHMANOHMANOHMANOHMANOHMANOHMAN
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Ironwood on May 15, 2013, 11:51:19 AM Yeah. Yeah, why not.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Samwise on May 15, 2013, 11:51:33 AM Wait, didn't he become High Emperor of the Necromongers or something at the end of the last movie (btw spoilers)? Why is he stranded on some bumfuck planet with monsters again? Why do I care?
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Evildrider on May 15, 2013, 11:54:52 AM Wait, didn't he become High Emperor of the Necromongers or something at the end of the last movie (btw spoilers)? Why is he stranded on some bumfuck planet with monsters again? Why do I care? My guess he ran away or tried to disband the Necromongers and is now being hunted for it. One of the guys that's hunting him in the trailer has Necromonger armor on. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Ironwood on May 15, 2013, 11:55:38 AM You don't care. They've remade Pitch Black and since it's a reboot you don't care. YOU DON'T CARE.
None of the above may be true, but I don't care either. Also, Starbuck. And someone else who looks even more attractive. So there's that. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 11:57:15 AM Starbuck looks like a man. I don't see the appeal with her.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: RhyssaFireheart on May 15, 2013, 12:03:12 PM OHMANOHMANOHMANOHMANOHMANOHMAN You don't care. They've remade Pitch Black and since it's a reboot you don't care. YOU DON'T CARE. Oh yes, please. Something about Vin Diesel's voice as Riddick is just awesome, IMO. And Ironwood's right, it's just Pitch Black rebooted, but who cares!None of the above may be true, but I don't care either. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 15, 2013, 12:09:18 PM Starbuck looks like a man. I don't see the appeal with her. She's a feisty female. I can see the attraction even if she was plain which she's not, same for Ripley, more interesting character than some girly type who needs to be saved all the time. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 12:19:38 PM Feisty?
Really? Also, people were sexually attracted to Ripley? Am I missing a joke here? I've heard this before, mind you, but I've always shrugged it off and laughed internally. Now I'm just flat out asking wtf. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: K9 on May 15, 2013, 12:34:42 PM Yes
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Ironwood on May 15, 2013, 12:48:01 PM Sigourney Weaver is lovely and quite sexy. Ripley is just Sigourney Weaver. If you don't like, you don't like, but don't be that guy.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: ghost on May 15, 2013, 12:55:38 PM Looks almost like a remake of Pitch Black. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 15, 2013, 12:55:45 PM Yeah, I don't know what to say, I'm equally confused how anyone could not find Ripley attractive. It's a strong character who doesn't take any shit played by Sigourney Weaver.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Trippy on May 15, 2013, 12:59:30 PM She was kind of hot walking around in her underwear in the first one :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: HaemishM on May 15, 2013, 01:14:36 PM Yep, I'm down.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Rishathra on May 15, 2013, 01:14:46 PM I thought Pitch Black was better than Chronicles, but I liked a lot of what Chronicles was doing, or tried to do, and I was exited about the implications at the end. (King Conan shot ftw!) So I'm excited to see more Riddick, but a little disappointed that it seems they drop the Necromonger arc almost completely, some random dude wearing the armor notwithstanding. Granted, it is completely within Riddick's character to become all-powerful ruler of an undead-ish army, and immediately go, 'Fuck you guys, fuck this throne, fuck this place, I'm out. Paece.' *mic drop*
My feelings, in short: Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 01:21:09 PM Allow me to be very specific:
Starbuck is a strict downgrade in the "hot girl" department from Radha Mitchell, Alexa Davalos, and Thandie Newton. and Judi Dench. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Brofellos on May 15, 2013, 01:22:56 PM Hey man count your blessings it could have easily been Michelle Rodriguez
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 01:23:21 PM RIDDICK: THE ANIMAL SIDE
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Brofellos on May 15, 2013, 01:24:51 PM Now I'm picturing movies like this if they totally botched casting the female. What if, like, Carey Mulligan was in it. (I mean that would make me like it more but I've got a pretty obvious type, soooooo)
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 01:28:01 PM Or like, Batman with Maggie Gyllenhaal.
Wait. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Brofellos on May 15, 2013, 01:30:01 PM She also has this unfortunate condition known as 'looks vaguely like the gravity around her is like 3x everyone else'
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Bzalthek on May 15, 2013, 01:30:07 PM Unf. Pitch Black / Chronicles are some of my favorite shit. I'm glad to see it's back.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: 01101010 on May 15, 2013, 01:36:32 PM Or like, Batman with Maggie Gyllenhaal. Wait. And here I thought I was the only one who is completely repulsed by her. Everyone I chatted with about Batman seemed to be gaga over her. Good to know. And what is wrong with Rodriguez other than terrible acting? I find her tomboyish-ness kinda hot. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Brofellos on May 15, 2013, 01:38:52 PM Or like, Batman with Maggie Gyllenhaal. Wait. And here I thought I was the only one who is completely repulsed by her. Everyone I chatted with about Batman seemed to be gaga over her. Good to know. And what is wrong with Rodriguez other than terrible acting? I find her tomboyish-ness kinda hot. Well I personally don't find 'bad-ass girl' trope attractive, but mostly I was mocking how she's always in action movies as the plucky female (see: L.A., Battle) Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on May 15, 2013, 01:44:09 PM She almost ruined Fast and the Furious. Every single one she was in.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: ghost on May 15, 2013, 01:46:48 PM Yeah, I don't know what to say, I'm equally confused how anyone could not find Ripley attractive. It's a strong character who doesn't take any shit played by Sigourney Weaver. I don't. She's a little too manly for me, particularly in the later movies. Then again, I just watched Resurrection the other night and that may have put me off. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Brofellos on May 15, 2013, 01:59:01 PM She almost ruined Fast and the Furious. Every single one she was in. But she's in the new one, which can't not be awesome because it has the Rock and Vin Diesel in it. A paradox. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on May 15, 2013, 02:22:48 PM I think Michelle Rodriguez is hot, although she does remind me of an ex from high school. I never thought Katee Sackhoff was anything too special.. but I'd still do her over Maggie Gyllenhall and Thandie Newton.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: ghost on May 15, 2013, 02:24:57 PM Katie Sackhoff is the only one in your list that is okay.
Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 15, 2013, 02:28:24 PM Yeah, I don't know what to say, I'm equally confused how anyone could not find Ripley attractive. It's a strong character who doesn't take any shit played by Sigourney Weaver. I don't. She's a little too manly for me, particularly in the later movies. Then again, I just watched Resurrection the other night and that may have put me off. I was trying, after rereading, trying poorly, to get across the point that attraction is such a subjective thing that I don't personally see any point to discussing it. But yeah, I was more talking about Alien. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ironwood on May 15, 2013, 02:31:30 PM Indeed.
If anyone thinks it really matters, please post a pic of your significant other so I can call her butt ugly. :why_so_serious: Title: Re: Riddick Post by: JWIV on May 15, 2013, 02:34:27 PM Lets get back to what's important - mostly how fucking awesome and terrible this movie is going to be.
Bonus Throne Picture from Chronicles Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 15, 2013, 02:39:30 PM I'll have to rewatch the first two movies, I can't remember much except I liked pitch black more than the 2nd. Is it fair to say Riddick is just Conan in space or is there more to it?
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: ghost on May 15, 2013, 02:48:37 PM You guys haven't frequented the NSFW T and A thread, have you? :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Samwise on May 15, 2013, 02:50:11 PM I wouldn't say there's "more" to it, but it's not quite that. Conan's more of the hero of his story, whereas things tend to happen AROUND Riddick and he just sort of kills anything that inconveniences him.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ironwood on May 15, 2013, 02:56:26 PM See, Pitch Black and Chronicles had pretty much fuck all to do with each other. That's the strange thing. Pitch Black was a stand alone story that wasn't even really about Riddick (he just turned out to be the best thing about it) and then they spun off some very, very weird shit around him.
PB is the better film for sure though and it also has Claudia in it. Oh yes. Not Inconsiderably so. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: ghost on May 15, 2013, 02:57:54 PM I wouldn't say there's "more" to it, but it's not quite that. Conan's more of the hero of his story, whereas things tend to happen AROUND Riddick and he just sort of kills anything that inconveniences him. He does at time seem to have important moral decisions and he seems to make the right choices. It's like a "good guy inside a rapist" teaser. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Bzalthek on May 15, 2013, 03:10:28 PM See, Pitch Black and Chronicles had pretty much fuck all to do with each other. That's the strange thing. Pitch Black was a stand alone story that wasn't even really about Riddick (he just turned out to be the best thing about it) and then they spun off some very, very weird shit around him. PB is the better film for sure though and it also has Claudia in it. Oh yes. Not Inconsiderably so. I totally forgot Claudia was in PB. I need to watch that again. Claudia does strange things to me. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Viin on May 15, 2013, 08:44:53 PM I'll have to rewatch the first two movies, I can't remember much except I liked pitch black more than the 2nd. Don't forget to watch the anime series too. Title: Re: Riddick. Post by: Ratman_tf on May 16, 2013, 12:54:16 AM Looks almost like a remake of Pitch Black. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing. Except the other characters don't look remotely as interesting as the ones from Pitch Black. I'll watch it, but I don't think it's going to be as 'fresh' as Pitch Black was when it came out. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Arthur_Parker on May 19, 2013, 12:03:31 PM I rewatched the first two movies, I remember the first as good but I enjoyed the 2nd one too, so I'm looking forward to the new one.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Tannhauser on May 19, 2013, 02:22:52 PM I have serious Boneitis for all the ladies mentioned except for Maggie Gyllenhall. She did have a couple of sexy scenes in The Secretary though.
Count me in the Riddick fan club. The Conan comparison is fairly decent. The first movie was 'The Hobbit' and the second was all three LOTR books combined. Plus, Dame Judi Dench slumming for a paycheck. Or maybe paycheque. Good to see Starbuck get work. She cleans up real good. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Teleku on May 19, 2013, 02:29:29 PM I'm down. Enjoyed the first two.
PB was probably the better movie, but I still ended up really liking the second movie for the crazy lore/setting. Its probably the closest we're ever going to get of live action Warhammer 40K for the foreseeable future. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on June 17, 2013, 12:49:56 PM International Riddick Trailer. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDPB2wUpff0)
Man this looks good. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Tannhauser on June 17, 2013, 03:37:01 PM Maybe those bounty hunters should have packed night vision gear on their starship. :awesome_for_real:
Honestly, who STILL fucks with Riddick? Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Tebonas on June 18, 2013, 04:19:24 AM I guess not many people who fuck with Riddick survive to warn others not to do it?
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Abagadro on June 18, 2013, 09:51:09 PM Although it had some goofy shit in it, Chronicles is one of those movies I appreciate because it actually has some cool sci-fi/space opera stuff in it that doesn't make it into films all that much these days. Not all that interested in another Pitch Black (although I liked that too on its own terms, plus Claudia!) as that is mostly just action/horror tropes.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Mattemeo on June 21, 2013, 06:42:04 AM I feel deeply depressed that this thread has already reached 2 pages. Pitch Black was a nice little throw-away scifi actioner with a vaguely interesting anti-hero lead, but it was what it was and required nothing more.
Chronicles of Riddick proved beyond a doubt that Pitch Black was where it should have stopped. Literally one of the worst movies I've ever had to pay money to see, ranked alongside AvP and the first Dungeons & Dragons movie (I couldn't say anything about the sequels to those films as I simply wouldn't give those bottom feeders responsible any more encouragement). I understand the concept of a vanity project but why pick one that makes you look so fucking bad? Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Lakov_Sanite on June 21, 2013, 07:04:50 AM Some people just don't like fun...
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Hawkbit on June 21, 2013, 07:06:11 AM Seriously.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: K9 on June 21, 2013, 07:22:53 AM Some people just don't like fun... *Looks at the Star Trek thread* :grin: Title: Re: Riddick Post by: tazelbain on June 21, 2013, 08:17:12 AM The key difference is Riddick isn't switching genres on an existing beloved IP.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: K9 on June 21, 2013, 09:24:31 AM :uhrr:
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Pennilenko on June 21, 2013, 10:22:06 AM I can't ever take f13 seriously when it comes to anything even remotely related to movies, books or music. However, this place is still my go to for rock solid gaming information/opinions, political conversation, and useless discussion. Oh yeah can't forget current events. Movie reviews...from here...foooooget aboutit.
To stay on topic, this movie looks awesome, and yes I will enjoy Riddick killing shit without nerdfucking the movie to death because it isn't realistic enough. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Arthur_Parker on June 21, 2013, 10:48:38 AM WUA got banned because of the Battleship movie, that cracks me up every time I think of it.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Pennilenko on June 21, 2013, 12:07:34 PM WUA got banned because of the Battleship movie, that cracks me up every time I think of it. Oh man, I went back to read that thread, he ramped up pretty quick into a froth. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Rendakor on June 21, 2013, 03:14:40 PM I'm with Mattemeo; Pitch Black was good while Chronicles was shitty and we didn't need any more Riddick. I don't really like Vin much as an actor though, so I'm biased.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Hayduke on June 21, 2013, 05:31:40 PM I kind of agree. Pitch Black was fun for kind of being a small movie with a forced setting operating in very limited constraints. But it never needed a sequel. The natural inclination of sequels is to go bigger and louder, which is exactly the opposite of what made Pitch Black entertaining.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Margalis on June 22, 2013, 02:39:56 AM Although it had some goofy shit in it, Chronicles is one of those movies I appreciate because it actually has some cool sci-fi/space opera stuff in it that doesn't make it into films all that much these days. I kind of agree, with the caveat that it was a bad movie and most of the cool stuff didn't work. But I do appreciate that it was not an established IP and had a pretty unique and ambitious vision. There is a good movie buried in there somewhere, it just didn't emerge due to execution issues. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: MediumHigh on June 22, 2013, 07:25:45 AM My girlfriend loves chronicles, to me it was a joyless riff on star wars the empire strikes back.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ghambit on June 22, 2013, 10:57:18 PM WUA got banned because of the Battleship movie, that cracks me up every time I think of it. Oh man, I went back to read that thread, he ramped up pretty quick into a froth. I helped. It was fun. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Furiously on June 29, 2013, 11:09:12 AM I feel deeply depressed that this thread has already reached 2 pages. Pitch Black was a nice little throw-away scifi actioner with a vaguely interesting anti-hero lead, but it was what it was and required nothing more. Chronicles of Riddick proved beyond a doubt that Pitch Black was where it should have stopped. Literally one of the worst movies I've ever had to pay money to see, ranked alongside AvP and the first Dungeons & Dragons movie (I couldn't say anything about the sequels to those films as I simply wouldn't give those bottom feeders responsible any more encouragement). I understand the concept of a vanity project but why pick one that makes you look so fucking bad? Yea, but this is about Pitch Black/Chronicles, not XXX. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Soulflame on June 30, 2013, 08:27:57 PM I like Pitch Black well enough, will watch Chronicles if it comes on, and at least one of the AvP movies (the first one, I think) is also entertaining.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on July 19, 2013, 03:26:23 PM Yeah... let's cut him loose. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Dm9zRogpE)
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ghambit on July 19, 2013, 05:50:47 PM (http://i46.tinypic.com/vy5oc2.jpg)
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on July 19, 2013, 09:44:53 PM Yeah... let's cut him loose. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Dm9zRogpE) sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetTitle: Re: Riddick Post by: Pennilenko on July 19, 2013, 10:33:53 PM Yeah... let's cut him loose. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Dm9zRogpE) That looks awesome, and I give no fucks about the opinions of haters. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Venkman on July 20, 2013, 09:03:35 AM "Yeaaa.... let's cut him loose".
Frakkin'* awesome! But, dumb question: wasn't he like the guy in charge at the end of the last movie? * couldn't resist Title: Re: Riddick Post by: K9 on July 20, 2013, 10:09:48 AM Yeaaaaaaah
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: HaemishM on July 20, 2013, 11:32:21 AM I'm down. And yes, fuck the haters. That just looks cool.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on July 20, 2013, 11:34:19 AM Darniaq, none of the Riddick stuff has really been in any MEANINGFUL order. Mostly due to both the video games being considered canon. As such "time" or rather, "chronology" of the movies and what's happening almost doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ard on July 20, 2013, 11:40:23 AM This is still somewhere after Chronicles of Riddick, since Karl Urban is back playing the necromonger dude again. I'm not sure how any of that fits in, but I'm sure it'll either be explained, or no one will bother to give any fucks either way, since that's not the point.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Venkman on July 20, 2013, 03:08:13 PM Darniaq, none of the Riddick stuff has really been in any MEANINGFUL order. Mostly due to both the video games being considered canon. As such "time" or rather, "chronology" of the movies and what's happening almost doesn't matter. Ah ok. So more standalone affairs than some strict arc. That's fine with me since they're exactly the kind of movie I like. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Abagadro on July 20, 2013, 06:15:11 PM That flying motorcycle stuff had a stinky whiff of Judge Dredd in it.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on July 20, 2013, 10:41:28 PM That flying motorcycle stuff had a stinky whiff of Judge Dredd in it. Well he also does the Superman seat grab in XXX. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on July 21, 2013, 08:05:32 AM Darniaq, none of the Riddick stuff has really been in any MEANINGFUL order. Mostly due to both the video games being considered canon. As such "time" or rather, "chronology" of the movies and what's happening almost doesn't matter. Ah ok. So more standalone affairs than some strict arc. That's fine with me since they're exactly the kind of movie I like. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Pennilenko on July 21, 2013, 09:53:10 AM In the movie business if you turn out winner after winner, monetarily speaking, you get to do pretty much what ever you want.
Is it wrong to have a man crush on Vin? Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on July 21, 2013, 12:14:10 PM Is it wrong to have a man crush on Vin? If it's wrong, I don't want to be right.Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ard on July 21, 2013, 12:40:28 PM Don't worry, I'm sure he'll still respect you in the morning.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on July 21, 2013, 12:54:20 PM In the movie business if you turn out winner after winner, monetarily speaking, you get to do pretty much what ever you want. Is it wrong to have a man crush on Vin? Vin Diesel had to take a huge pay cut to make Riddick. I saw an interview where he was talking about how he used Fast and Furious 6 to make up for the lack of paycheck. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: schild on July 21, 2013, 12:55:17 PM Well, Diesel's huge pay cut still results in millions of dollars. Also, from the beginning he said the Riddick stuff was a labor of love. He's basically just larping in them. (the only acceptable larping ever)
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Tannhauser on July 21, 2013, 02:24:38 PM I like Riddick because he's such an over the top bad ass, but Diesel somehow makes it work.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Surlyboi on July 21, 2013, 03:27:31 PM Well, Diesel's huge pay cut still results in millions of dollars. Also, from the beginning he said the Riddick stuff was a labor of love. He's basically just larping in them. (the only acceptable larping ever) Sigged. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Lakov_Sanite on July 22, 2013, 06:19:52 AM Riddick for what it is, is great. It's an 80's sci-fi/action movie and chronicles is still watchable when it comes on tv.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Bzalthek on July 23, 2013, 02:34:44 PM Shhh, don't try to explain it. Just feel it. Let it flow through you.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on August 30, 2013, 11:00:44 AM So Vin had to leverage his house to get the money to make Riddick. (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/vin-diesel-risked-all-riddick-617586)
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: KallDrexx on August 30, 2013, 03:33:33 PM So Vin had to leverage his house to get the money to make Riddick. (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/vin-diesel-risked-all-riddick-617586) Quote Plans for more Riddick are already in the works, as Diesel confirmed to THR that Twohy is currently writing the next installment. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Viin on August 31, 2013, 06:10:58 PM Shit I hope he didn't leverage my house too.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Riggswolfe on September 01, 2013, 10:56:29 PM I grabbed the Blu Ray 3-pack they just put out for $5 after my $10 gift card I had. It had the unrated versions of both Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick and I watched both. I didn't notice a difference in Pitch Black really but Chronicles? That's a totally different movie. I remember being 'meh' about it when I saw it in the Theaters and later on cable but the 'director's cut' changed my entire view of that film. You really see the mythology they were going for and realize that the cut we got in the theaters truly was butchered.
I am now going to see this next movie on Friday if I can pull it off! Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Evildrider on September 01, 2013, 11:29:04 PM Yeah the director's cut adds some Furyan back story to Chronicles. It really makes it better.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Setanta on September 02, 2013, 01:37:38 AM Signed.
PB was awesome and the director's cut of Chronicles was good value. I still think his best film was Iron Giant though Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Khaldun on September 03, 2013, 09:22:55 AM I always liked Chronicles even with its issues. It reminded me of some reason of the game Emperor of the Fading Suns, which I always loved even though it was broken in so many ways.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: MahrinSkel on September 05, 2013, 09:55:58 PM The version of Chronicles currently on cable is not the theatrical cut, apparently it's not the Director's Cut from the blu-ray either but something in between, mostly a few seconds added here and there that helps tie the plot together a little better (the Purifier's actions when he meets Riddick aren't quite so random, for example).
Going to watch the blu-ray version sometime soon, see how it compares. --Dave Title: Re: Riddick Post by: kaid on September 06, 2013, 09:17:55 AM Well, Diesel's huge pay cut still results in millions of dollars. Also, from the beginning he said the Riddick stuff was a labor of love. He's basically just larping in them. (the only acceptable larping ever) Yup he is still getting a big payday and doing something he wants to do for fun so its win win. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Speedy Cerviche on September 06, 2013, 09:30:19 AM I like the way Diesel seems to really care about the stuff he makes, even though it is pop, and not be content with just shoveling out nonsensical crap as long as it makes money (unlike say JJ Abrams).. He has pride in his work. Even Fast & Furious where he has taken over producing, he is trying to close plotholes and create some continuity that makes sense.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Merusk on September 06, 2013, 11:15:30 AM I always believe it's because he's such a gigantic nerd. I'd like to think he'd fit in with this crowd in terms of bitching about details.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ironwood on September 06, 2013, 02:09:45 PM Um, is this good ?
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Velorath on September 06, 2013, 06:39:27 PM Um, is this good ? Not really. It's a much slower paced Pitch Black with some cringe inducing dialog in parts. Plus Riddick is apparently now so awesome he can turn lesbians straight which I'm sure isn't offensive to the gay community at all. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: SurfD on September 06, 2013, 08:35:12 PM Um, is this good ? Not really. It's a much slower paced Pitch Black with some cringe inducing dialog in parts. Plus Riddick is apparently now so awesome he can turn lesbians straight which I'm sure isn't offensive to the gay community at all. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Velorath on September 06, 2013, 08:39:16 PM If I'm not mistaken, her exact words were "I don't fuck guys".
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Ghambit on September 06, 2013, 08:48:13 PM Saw it. This was basically sci-fi Rambo+pitch black; or came close to it. I liked the movie, but didn't love it, nor was it better then the 1st two. Sackhoff was also too much of a distraction, in a good way though I guess.
Definitely felt like Diesel is setting up for an ongoing thing here; unlike Chronicles which in production was only slated as a one-shot thing. I can give it a pass with the assumption that there will be more as on its own the movie doesn't stand up. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Tannhauser on September 07, 2013, 04:15:27 AM Um, is this good ? Not really. It's a much slower paced Pitch Black with some cringe inducing dialog in parts. Plus Riddick is apparently now so awesome he can turn lesbians straight which I'm sure isn't offensive to the gay community at all. Kramer did it first. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Khaldun on September 07, 2013, 05:04:31 AM If I'm not mistaken, her exact words were "I don't fuck guys". Saw it quoted in a review: "I don't fuck guys, I fuck them up." Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Velorath on September 07, 2013, 10:16:21 AM The character just doesn't work anymore. There's none of the mystery about him that made his character at least somewhat interesting in Pitch Black, so they seem to keep trying to push what a badass he is, while at the same time reminding us that deep down he's really a nice guy who rescues puppies and defends children. Riddick himself says near the beginning of the movie that somewhere along the line he lost his edge, and that's sadly appearent throughout the movie because they're trying so damn hard to convince us otherwise.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Stokowski on September 08, 2013, 05:57:40 AM Plus, doesn't Vin have one too many chins for this sort of thing, these days?
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Surlyboi on September 08, 2013, 09:44:52 AM He is no longer diesel.
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Lakov_Sanite on September 08, 2013, 09:06:37 PM Vin Unleaded
Title: Re: Riddick Post by: K9 on September 11, 2013, 04:03:55 AM I watched this last night; it's a fun film, and I think it's better than Chronicles. It's nowhere near as good as Pitch Black, but then it was never going to recapture that feeling. As a film about Riddick, the man in all his psychotic, anti-hero glory it does a good job I think.
That said, I felt sorry for Katee Sackhoff who gets arguably some of the worst dialogue of any character in any film ever. This film would have been better off if it had zero female characters; there's no need to put a token one in, it's not like it's going to convince anyone that the film somehow offers a sympathetic and meaningful portrayal of women. Title: Re: Riddick Post by: Rishathra on September 11, 2013, 05:41:23 AM That said, I felt sorry for Katee Sackhoff who gets arguably some of the worst dialogue of any character in any film ever. So much this. Every single thing about her character was a cliche, with several of the cliches contradicting themselves. There was no actual character there. No disrespect to her as an actress, as it wasn't anything she did that was the problem, it was just a horribly, horribly written role. |