Title: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 16, 2005, 12:53:45 PM Quote from: Ireland Online Brosnan 'wanted' $42 million' to play Bond again (http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=133826536&p=y338z7z4z) 16/02/2005 - 09:57:25 Pierce Brosnan was dropped from playing James Bond because he demanded $42m (€31.9m) to reprise his role as the superspy for a fifth time. Pierce Brosnan was dropped from playing James Bond because he demanded $42m (€31.9m) to reprise his role as the superspy for a fifth time. Producers balked at the demand and axed the 51-year-old Irishman - in favour of finding a new 007 for the upcoming 21st Bond blockbuster Casino Royale. Brosnan has spoken of being "surprised, disappointed and saddened" that 'Die another day', which grossed $456m (€348m) will be his last outing as 007 - but claims his wage "was an honest fee in terms of how much blood, sweat and tears I put into the role". But industry magazine Variety's editor-in-chief Peter Bart says Brosnan "priced himself out of the market" with a reported "compensation package" that "would total north of $40 million" Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 16, 2005, 12:56:02 PM Quote from: Ireland Online claims his wage "was an honest fee in terms of how much blood, sweat and tears I put into the role". Is blood, sweat and tears synonymous with bullshit? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Llava on February 16, 2005, 01:04:45 PM I can honestly say that Die Another Day was one of the best performances I've seen in my lifetime.
In other news, I, too, am full of shit. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: MaceVanHoffen on February 16, 2005, 01:05:09 PM Quote from: Ireland Online Brosnan 'wanted' $42 million' to play Bond again (http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=133826536&p=y338z7z4z) Pierce Brosnan was dropped from playing James Bond because he demanded $42m (€31.9m) ... 'Die another day', which grossed $456m (€348m) ... Brosnan is demanding a little less than 10% of the gross from his last picture, which puts it into perspective. I haven't liked Bond flicks since Connery, but it seems to me that people (men, mostly) see Bond flicks for three reasons: (1) the Bond girls, and (2) the Bond girls, and (3) the actor playing Bond. Possibly a fourth reason would be seeing the actor playing Bond getting shacked up with 1 or more Bond girls. Call me crazy, but 10% of the gross of a film seems a reasonable request for the central actor in it. Even though I hate modern Bond movies, I have to concede that not just any actor can play him. The real problem is that the studio doesn't see it that way. EDIT: I like grammar! Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Llava on February 16, 2005, 01:07:34 PM Even though I hate modern Bond movies, I have to concede that not just any actor can play him. The real problem is that the studio doesn't see it that way. Coming soon: (http://www.moviepostershop.com/item_img/1-15249.jpg) Diesel. Vin Diesel. Actually, I'd say that this has a better shot: (http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/Colin_Farrell_calendar.jpg) After all... he's from some part of English-speaking Europe. That's all that matters. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 16, 2005, 01:09:14 PM Can I say Clive Owen again?
Clive Owen. Thanks. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: kidder on February 16, 2005, 01:11:29 PM Sean Connery would be worth 42 million...or more. It would be the BIGGEST BOND MOVIE EVER.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on February 16, 2005, 01:13:28 PM Sean Connery would be worth 42 million...or more. It would be the BIGGEST BOND MOVIE EVER. Except his Bond vehicle would be a Lincoln Towncar, and he'd chase villans with the left turn blinker on the whole way. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: kidder on February 16, 2005, 01:14:50 PM Sean Connery would be worth 42 million...or more. It would be the BIGGEST BOND MOVIE EVER. Except his Bond vehicle would be a Lincoln Towncar, and he'd chase villans with the left turn blinker on the whole way. You think he's a bit old? Hehe, I'm still chuckling about that. I still think he could do it. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: MaceVanHoffen on February 16, 2005, 01:18:54 PM Can I say Clive Owen again? Clive Owen. Thanks. Hell yeah. Clive Owen would rock. That might make me shell out money to see a Bond movie in the theatre instead of watching 1-minute intervals on cable during commercials. Anything would be better than the sucktastic Timothy Dalton. Dalton's a good actor. He just ain't Bond. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 16, 2005, 01:23:51 PM Can I say Clive Owen again? Clive Owen. Thanks. Hell yeah. Clive Owen would rock. That might make me shell out money to see a Bond movie in the theatre instead of watching 1-minute intervals on cable during commercials. Anything would be better than the sucktastic Timothy Dalton. Dalton's a good actor. He just ain't Bond. He was better than Roger. I miss George. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: HaemishM on February 16, 2005, 01:30:41 PM $42 million is EXCESSIVE, even in Hollywood where excess is the name of the game. That's goddamn highway robbery.
Yes, Clive Owen please. However, it will more than likely be someone they can pay less, such as the Aussie guy who plays on that Swiffer Wet Jet commercial and who played Kano in Mortal Kombat. And please, FUCK NO, do not make it Colin FUCKING FARRELL. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 16, 2005, 01:41:42 PM The blood, sweat, and tears came about when NBC screwed him out of becoming Bond after Roger Moore left, which is how we got Timothy Dalton for a while.
Personally, I'd like to see Jude Law as Bond. Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 16, 2005, 01:42:34 PM Jude Law does a bad serious/suave. He's much more comedic than the past bonds (case in point: Down with Love). I'm sorry, but he's no good for the role.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 16, 2005, 01:45:29 PM Didn't you see Gattaca?
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 16, 2005, 01:45:42 PM I'm sick of the whole thing. They all seem to same now. They need to spice it up, I think.
(http://www.deliciousironing.com/images/userphotos/James%20Bondage.GIF) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 16, 2005, 01:46:04 PM Yea I saw Gattaca, and he's done nothing like it since. And he wasn't suave and gave no smooth one-liners in it.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: MaceVanHoffen on February 16, 2005, 02:05:51 PM $42 million is EXCESSIVE ... The raw amount is excessive, absolutely. No one is really worth $42 million. The actor playing Bond is, IMHO, 10% or more of why people go to see Bond flicks, and therefore that actor is worth 10% of the revenue. That's why I think it's a "reasonable" request. I'd certainly rather see that 10% go into an actor's hands (and even the crew's hands) instead of the studio's. Most studios would just waste the profit on (even) more craptastic actors in movies that regale us with mediocrity. Maybe pulling money away from studios will someday stop the Uwe Bolls of the world from getting hired. I can only dream. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: MisterNoisy on February 16, 2005, 02:31:21 PM I was under the impression that Brosnan didn't want to do any more Bond flicks (http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5550607). If so, this is just him talking crazy to encourage MGM to shop elsewhere.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Trippy on February 16, 2005, 03:50:29 PM Yea I saw Gattaca, and he's done nothing like it since. And he wasn't suave and gave no smooth one-liners in it. I thought he had that suave thing going in Sky Captain.Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Trippy on February 16, 2005, 03:57:00 PM $42 million is EXCESSIVE, even in Hollywood where excess is the name of the game. But not unprecedented. Tom Cruise took a percentage of gross (no salary) for MI:2 and Last Samurai and made around $75 million and $45 million respectively.Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on February 16, 2005, 04:18:08 PM That is because he's Tom Fucking Cruise.
And yes, please no more Colin Farrell....from what I heard/imagine, he absolutly butchered Alexander....but I'm something of a purist when it comes to history-based films. On a sidenote, can someone please make Hollywood stop squandering such historical movie possibilities? You get a great story like The Illiad or Alexander, and these dipshit studios for some reason see a reason to cut it up...this stuff has survived for more than 2 millenia for a reason. Also, last week I managed to sit through about 1/3rd of Troy....can someone please explain to me why someone thought it was neccessary to cut out a good, I dunno, 60% of the original story? If LotR can be made into an almost direct port to the screen (from what I've heard, as I've only seen the first of the three), why not The Illiad? PS - To stay on topic, while Brosnan's price may have seemed extreme, Bond films also gross a metric fuckton of cash, so it doesn't seem that unreasonable. I personally like Brosnan as an actor, so w/e. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Margalis on February 16, 2005, 10:35:37 PM Yes, Clive Owen please. However, it will more than likely be someone they can pay less, such as the Aussie guy who plays on that Swiffer Wet Jet commercial and who played Kano in Mortal Kombat. Considering that guy has been dead for a year or two, I imagine it would be quite cheap. 42 million is obviously crazy. Who gives a shit? Personally I think all Bond films suck ass, the newer ones even moreso than the older ones. Edit: They all have the exact same plot, are poorly written and predictable. They are like daytime soaps and wresting, dramatic re-enactment of the same thing over and over again. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: HaemishM on February 17, 2005, 08:16:05 AM Bond films lost a lot of creative steam after the first four or five of them. About the only thing propping them up is the performance of the lead and the tits of whoever is this week's Bond girl. The Brosnan films have been EXTREMELY uneven, going from ok but silly (Goldeneye's motorcycle parachute), to pretty decent (the one with Michelle Yeoh and Terri Hatcher), to downright fucking awful (The World is Not Enough), to watchable but not Connery-worthy in Die Another Day (thank you for no Halle Berry spinoff). The production company needs to read the goddamn books again. The over-the-top gadgetry and formulaic nature of the Roger Moore movies have stained the series and taken way too much attention. They need to go back to the more down-to-earth formula of the Ian Fleming books.
Bond is a fucking assasin after all, and only one movie, the second Dalton film, ever really acknowledges that. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on February 17, 2005, 08:30:56 AM Yes, the License to Kill needs to be renewed.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: ahoythematey on February 17, 2005, 10:08:06 AM Methinks MGM should watch the Indiana Jones flicks for pointers on retaining the fantastical aspects of the bond world with down-to-earth realism. It would also help to have a Bond actor capable of such.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: eldaec on February 17, 2005, 10:50:04 AM Jude Law does a bad serious/suave. He's much more comedic than the past bonds (case in point: Down with Love). I'm sorry, but he's no good for the role. Jude Law's 'Down with Love' performance as 'a person not in that film' was excellent. I have never seen anyone play 'a person who isn't here' better. In other apparently unrelated news, I can't imagine Ewan MacGregor as Bond either, nor can I imagine he or Jude Law would want to do it. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: kidder on February 17, 2005, 10:54:29 AM Ewan MacGregor or Jude Law are both too prissy to be the next Bond. Clive Owen, I can see being a suave badass.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 17, 2005, 11:56:17 AM Jude Law's 'Down with Love' performance as 'a person not in that film' was excellent. I have never seen anyone play 'a person who isn't here' better. Kevin Costner's role as Alex, the dead guy in "The Big Chill" is widely regarded as one of the best examples. (Some have even called it Costner's best acting performance in his career! *rimshot*) Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Riggswolfe on February 18, 2005, 08:43:38 AM The worst rumor about Bond I have heard is that Orlando Bloom may be the next Bond so they can aim at younger audiences.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on February 18, 2005, 09:11:57 AM I guess I should just go on a genocidal rampage against this "younger audience" so they have nothing to aim for.
Fuck you Orlando Bloom, for pussifying one of the greatest and oldest epics in human history. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 09:17:19 AM I quite like the Rowan Atkinson rumour. He could do it!
(http://www.thisisthelakedistrict.co.uk/_images/db/6/87/Johnny_English.68711.full.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: WayAbvPar on February 18, 2005, 09:21:20 AM If it was Rowan Atkinson from BlackAdder II or III, he could do it. I could do without his Mr. Bean persona.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Mortriden on February 18, 2005, 09:24:59 AM I could do without Rowan Atkinson. Anywhere. In anything. Ever.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 09:35:34 AM I like the Blackadder series the best, too. He was quite fun in Not the Nine O'clock News, too, which he wrote for and acted in. I'm not a huge fan of Mr. Bean... the series or the film. He has a lovely collection of cars, too!
(http://www.virtrade.com/auto/pic/ast_zag_3.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 18, 2005, 09:39:38 AM I have a small man-crush on Alan Davies and wouldn't mind seeing him get the role.
(http://web.ukonline.co.uk/liane.broadley/alan/images/alan4.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 18, 2005, 09:47:32 AM Rowan Atkinson, Alan Davies?
I may as well throw Eddie Izzard in the mix: (http://us.ent4.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/strand_releasing/all_the_queen_s_men/eddie_izzard/queen.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 09:52:16 AM I LOVE Alan Davies! I'm a big fan of Jonathan Creek. Anyone notice that the magician from that show was Giles from Buffy? Alan Davies as James Bond? Ooh... I don't know about that, Shockeye. I don't know if he can be quite classy enough. By the way, I was joking about Rowan Atkinson being 007... I just love the rumour, though.
A lot of people have the look... most of the ones mentioned here seem like they'd be good at it. Clive Owen sounds good to me and Connery could surely do it... I mean, never say never again, right? Just 20 years later... again. Eddie Izzard is wonderful and is probably a good enough actor to actually pull it off. (though James Bond never struck me as being very demanding as far as acting goes) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 18, 2005, 09:54:45 AM Giles wasn't arrogant enough to be the magician. I liked the guy they replaced him with.
Alan probably can't pull off James Bond, but I wanted an excuse to post his picture. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 10:01:41 AM Giles wasn't arrogant enough to be the magician. I liked the guy they replaced him with. Alan probably can't pull off James Bond, but I wanted an excuse to post his picture. You are such a fanboi! One of the things I've always loved about you is your tendancy towards shades of pink. Needless to say, it's a very manly shade of pink. Needless to say. :-) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 18, 2005, 10:05:03 AM My pink only goes so far. I refuse to watch "Gilmore Girls".
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 18, 2005, 10:08:03 AM I would think Eddie Izzard could actually pull off being Bond, but I was less-than-impressed by his work in Shadow of the Vampire. Then again, he was playing a bad actor in the movie, so perhaps he was acting badly on purpose.
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 18, 2005, 10:08:51 AM I just posted a picture of a transvestite (albeit an "executive" transvetite). How I managed to avoid being called a "shade of pink", I'll never know (not that I would want to be called such though).
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 18, 2005, 10:11:44 AM I just posted a picture of a transvestite (albeit an "executive" transvetite). How I managed to avoid being called a "shade of pink", I'll never know (not that I would want to be called such though). But Eddie is known for comedy, not just for dressing up. Unlike RuPaul. If you'd posted a picture of RuPaul then you could've been called various things. Eddie Izzard, not so much. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: eldaec on February 18, 2005, 10:17:40 AM Fuck you Orlando Bloom, for pussifying one of the greatest and oldest epics in human history. Troy was plenty ruined by any number of things before Mr Bloom. It isn't going to be anyone that famous anyhow - it'll be someone in at least their late thirties who is happy to tie their entire career to Bond, now that they know they are never going to be *really* famous any other way. Colin Salmon (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0758760/) should be a real contender; I suspect Jack Davenport (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0202603/) would be a good pick, but won't get it because he's now throughly typecast; I'd be interested to see Christopher Ecclestone (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001172/) try the role, but only if he can dump the mancunian accent. If you want an outsider, try Richard Roxburgh (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0746896/), Austrailian is close enough to British for noone to mind much, and he's demonstrated an ability to play British a number of times. Whoever it is, I'll be very surprised if it's anyone better known than one of those I listed above. EDIT: Oh, and if Davenport, Ecclestone, and Roxburgh don't get it, they'd all make decent Bond villians at some point. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 10:21:06 AM I think Stray is rather pink. I like that so many of you are in touch with your feminine side. Some of you could use some work, though. My own husband, Righ, and Haemish seem completely hopeless, for example. Righ will cuddle... but only in a very deep voice. Schild does try to be a wee bit pink, but fails miserably. I love him for trying, however.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 18, 2005, 10:27:39 AM "Rather" pink? :oops:
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 10:34:01 AM Sorry... I meant a wee bit pink, not rather pink with emphasis on rather. A little pink is nice. No pink at all is slightly scary.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 18, 2005, 11:08:48 AM Nah I'm just kidding. Emphasis on "rather" is probably closer to the truth. More than I care to admit. I'm a boyfriend and girlfriend all at once (Hmm...Did I just say that? I mean it in the most "normal" way possible...Not in the Eddie Izzard sense :-P).
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 18, 2005, 11:12:24 AM My pink only goes so far. I refuse to watch "Gilmore Girls". This, coming from the guy that owns Sledgehammer on DVD. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 11:15:26 AM Hey! I love Peter Gabriel!
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Righ on February 18, 2005, 11:22:01 AM Rhys Ifans should be the next James Bond.
(http://www.dailyllama.com/news/2002/images/rhys_ifans.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 18, 2005, 11:23:04 AM No, this Sledge Hammer! (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0090525/)
(http://www.lethaldeath.com/Crimson/Images/ResidentDVDvil/Sledge%20Hammer.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on February 18, 2005, 11:23:41 AM Signe should do a pink list of all the posters.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 18, 2005, 11:24:19 AM Rhys Ifans should be the next James Bond. (http://i.imdb.com/mptv1.gif) While he was wonderful in "Notting Hill" and "The Replacements", he's just too lanky to be Bond. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 18, 2005, 11:24:51 AM Now, did you have to go and kill this thread by posting that image? I was ok with them thinking it was something else.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 18, 2005, 11:33:59 AM The series had its moments. It's interesting to contrast the characters in the Pilot with how the actual series turned out.
When they found out they were cancelled, they actually blew up the world in nuclear war at the end of Season Two. No half-measures with this show! Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 18, 2005, 01:09:19 PM I've never even heard of that Sledgehammer!
Sorry. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Margalis on February 18, 2005, 07:12:45 PM I used to love that show! Wasn't there one where the main character got made into some sort of boom-box robot or something like that?
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Llava on February 18, 2005, 09:26:13 PM I remember watching that with my parents. I seem to recall one episode in which he tackles a vampire.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Margalis on February 18, 2005, 11:25:38 PM Wouldn't he also fall down the stairs all the time?
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 19, 2005, 05:26:28 AM That show sounds like "Get Smart!" I love that show. They used to have repeats all the time but I haven't seen any in ages. I don't know why very, very silly spy spoofs appeal to me... I suppose it's some sort of character flaw. I thought the Austin Powers films were outrageously funny, too.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 19, 2005, 07:35:20 AM Instead of a spy spoof, it was a cop spoof. Sledge Hammer was more like Dirty Harry meets Police Squad. It wasn't nearly as funny, though.
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 19, 2005, 08:14:02 AM I thought I should mention that season four of Jonathan Creek started last Monday on BBC America. Just in case someone didn't know....
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 26, 2005, 10:59:41 AM Quote from: Guardian Unlimited Nip/Tuck star may squeeze into Bond role (http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Guardian/0,4029,1425285,00.html) Staff and agencies Friday February 25, 2005 Julian McMahon, the Australian-born star of US cable hit Nip/Tuck who will play Doctor Doom in the big screen version of Fantastic Four this summer, is the latest actor to stake his claim to the James Bond role. McMahon says 007 producers told him the race to succeed Pierce Brosnan was between him and one other person. Franchise producers are expected to announce later this year who will become the next incarnation of the British superspy. Clive Owen is regarded the frontrunner and has seen his stock rise in recent months with a Golden Globe win and an Academy Award nomination for Closer. Other performers who have been associated with the role include Ewan McGregor, Stuart Townsend, Colin Farrell and Robbie Williams. Martin Campbell will direct the 21st Bond instalment and told reporters this week the story will focus on the character's early days as a secret agent and will be grittier than previous outings, featuring a scene where Bond is threatened with castration by an enemy. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 26, 2005, 11:54:20 AM I will now log my 57th vote for Clive Owen as James Bond.
The guy from Nip/Tuck is too goddamn sleazy. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 26, 2005, 12:55:35 PM I will now log my 57th vote for Clive Owen as James Bond. The guy from Nip/Tuck is too goddamn sleazy. That and he's going to ruin Dr. Doom. I did like him on "Charmed". He fit that role pretty well and he was completely useless on "Profiler". Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Big Gulp on February 26, 2005, 01:30:39 PM It really doesn't matter, Jason Bourne is the new James Bond.
It's basically just a mixture of Day of the Jackal mixed with the Bond movies to begin with. And it's so much more gratifying than Bond because it's smarter, grittier, and while thrilling, still technically still within the realm of believability. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 26, 2005, 03:08:09 PM Isn't Jason Bourne a fictional character?
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 26, 2005, 03:48:55 PM James Bond is too. All he's saying is that Jason Bourne is the new James Bond as red is the new yellow. Or whatever.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 26, 2005, 04:09:28 PM Oh God. I can't believe I asked that. I just realised what he meant. I thought there was some actor named Jason Bourne but couldn't find him when I googled.
D'oh! Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on February 26, 2005, 04:29:10 PM Isn't Jason Bourne a fictional character? Aren't you? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on February 26, 2005, 05:44:45 PM I might be a fig newton of your imagination... I seem to have crunchy bits that get stuck between your teeth, though so chances are, I'm the real deal.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 26, 2005, 07:14:22 PM I'm sorry, the Bourne Identity is cool and all, but a character named "Jason" is not going to be the new Bond.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 26, 2005, 08:53:49 PM I'm sorry, the Bourne Identity is cool and all, but a character named "Jason" is not going to be the new Bond. James and Jason. Bourne and Bond. Hey, guess what, I think they've already done it. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 26, 2005, 09:56:57 PM I'm sorry, the Bourne Identity is cool and all, but a character named "Jason" is not going to be the new Bond. James and Jason. Bourne and Bond. Hey, guess what, I think they've already done it. Wait...I thought this guy was the replacement Bond, *if anything*? (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/saint1.jpg) Wait a second, I mean this guy: (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/saint2.jpg) As for Jason Bourne...Yeah, he's a spy (or something like that), and definitely an asskicker. I'm sure he could even kick the shit out of James Bond as well. But is that enough to replace Bond? No. Why? No sense of cool. On one hand, you have Bourne, who doesn't even know his identity, let alone how to be cool. He just knows how to kill. On the other hand, you have Bond, who not only knows his own identity -- he's even impressed by the sound of his own name. And not only can he kill -- he does it wearing a goddamn tuxedo. Flak jackets just aren't that cool. Secondly, Bond Girls. Bourne has had what? One pasty Russian damsel in distress? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 26, 2005, 10:34:32 PM Val Kilmer would be an interesting Bond. Seriously though, I wish the Saint had become a series [of movies].
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 26, 2005, 10:51:37 PM Val would be interesting, but I think he'd be too old. He's 45; only 6 years younger than Brosnan. Jude Law is only 32.
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 26, 2005, 10:57:08 PM Val would be interesting, but I think he'd be too old. He's 45; only 6 years younger than Brosnan. Six years is 3-4 movies. Jude Law wouldn't make a good Bond. Too many facial blemishes. His head isn't the right shape. And he has too much wonky english charm. Like Hugh Grant. Stop suggesting him. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 26, 2005, 11:28:47 PM Stop shooting him down.
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on February 26, 2005, 11:34:22 PM Not a chance. You'd be terrible at casting in Hollywood.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 27, 2005, 12:02:57 AM I'm almost positive I could find a quote of Jude saying "Huh? No fucking way!"
That's how bad the idea is. Or maybe you know a friend of a friend of a friend that knows him, Bruce? Care to send the question to him? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 27, 2005, 01:50:05 AM Or maybe you know a friend of a friend of a friend that knows him, Bruce? Care to send the question to him? No, but I did ask Val Kilmer, and he told me Schild was artsty fartsy. Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Stephen Zepp on February 27, 2005, 07:39:02 AM I'm almost positive I could find a quote of Jude saying "Huh? No fucking way!" That's how bad the idea is. Or maybe you know a friend of a friend of a friend that knows him, Bruce? Care to send the question to him? Hmm...I thought that baiting members wasn't allowed? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Murgos on February 27, 2005, 07:49:58 AM Hmm...I thought that baiting members wasn't allowed? Baiting, otoh, is perfectly acceptible as long as you're not baiting Bruce, which you should be ashamed to do anyway because there is no skill in it and it's utterly predictable. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Big Gulp on February 27, 2005, 08:01:06 AM No sense of cool. On one hand, you have Bourne, who doesn't even know his identity, let alone how to be cool. He just knows how to kill. On the other hand, you have Bond, who not only knows his own identity -- he's even impressed by the sound of his own name. And not only can he kill -- he does it wearing a goddamn tuxedo. Flak jackets just aren't that cool. See, that's my problem with the Bond series as it currently stands. It's gotten too debonair and wussified. When Connery had the role he brought to it a certain sense of rough and tumbleness; Bond wasn't afraid to get his hands dirty. That really changed when Roger Moore got ahold of the role, and changed it quite a bit for the worse in my opinion, Bond being suave and using gadgetry became the sole focus of the movies, and consequently they lost a lot of their soul. Now, you watch something like Day of the Jackal (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069947/) and it works on a different level. Sure it's still an "espionage" thriller, but the hero (villain?) works in the realm of reality. He doesn't stay ahead of his opponents through superhuman feats or gadgets, but through methodically working his way around problems and sheer ingenuity. He isn't a superman, just an extremely capable person who exhibits a level of ruthless efficiency to achieve his goals. That's sort of the zeitgeist that the Bourne series taps into (although not quite as well, IMO). Both types of movies are sheer escapism, I just prefer the latter to the former. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Murgos on February 27, 2005, 09:15:57 AM He doesn't stay ahead of his opponents through superhuman feats or gadgets, but through methodically working his way around problems and sheer ingenuity. He isn't a superman, just an extremely capable person who exhibits a level of ruthless efficiency to achieve his goals. That's sort of the zeitgeist that the Bourne series taps into (although not quite as well, IMO). Interestingly thats almost exactly the James Bond from the books. Red headed, boxer type who looks like a palooka (He's decribed as thick fingered and even with a cauliflower ear, I seem to recall) but continuously destroys these fiendish plots through ruthlessness and ingenuity. Sean Connery was probably the closest Bond to the books and so it's not really a surprise that the stories 'fit' him better. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on February 27, 2005, 10:21:43 AM Red headed, boxer type who looks like a palooka (He's decribed as thick fingered and even with a cauliflower ear, I seem to recall) but continuously destroys these fiendish plots through ruthlessness and ingenuity. So in the books, he's just a smarter version of this guy? (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/lonestar627/Misc/vinniejones.jpg) Anyways...Whatever the case, I'm not defending the Moore or Brosnan Bond over Bourne. Brosnan wears the Tux because he's metrosexual. While the Connery Bond just likes to have some class. There's a difference there. Just because I'm saying the character has to be smooth doesn't mean I'm trying to wussify it. Not at all. It's possible to be both -- It's just that few actors can pull that off. And that's where I'd have to agree with schild about Clive Owen. Owen's got some of the same traits Connery has -- a little rough around the edges, and can be convincing as an asskicker...But he can also play it smooth as well . If you want to see the Bond flicks recover what they lost in the past -- Owen would be the man for the job, I think. If you want to see the G.I. Joe version of the espionage flick, then yeah, Bourne's got that covered. But I find it hard to believe that particular take on the genre can replace James Bond, or that something similar was the original intent of the Fleming books. Was the whole "smooth alpha male international spy" thing just made up for the movies or what? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Trippy on February 27, 2005, 04:44:42 PM He doesn't stay ahead of his opponents through superhuman feats or gadgets, but through methodically working his way around problems and sheer ingenuity. He isn't a superman, just an extremely capable person who exhibits a level of ruthless efficiency to achieve his goals. That's sort of the zeitgeist that the Bourne series taps into (although not quite as well, IMO). Interestingly thats almost exactly the James Bond from the books. Red headed, boxer type who looks like a palooka (He's decribed as thick fingered and even with a cauliflower ear, I seem to recall) but continuously destroys these fiendish plots through ruthlessness and ingenuity. Sean Connery was probably the closest Bond to the books and so it's not really a surprise that the stories 'fit' him better. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on February 27, 2005, 05:38:34 PM LOL, just my luck, Chris Rock goes off on Jude Law at the Oscar's tonight.
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: HaemishM on February 28, 2005, 11:25:46 AM Dalton was closer to the book Bond than any of the others. Owen would be the best out there, although I think it'd be brilliant to see Vinnie Jones in that role. "Look 'ere, mate, you wanna tell me wat SMERSH is up to, or do I gotta break your fuckin' fingers right bloody off? You don't wanna be messin' wif me there, boy."
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SnotBag on March 13, 2005, 09:34:49 PM Quote I miss George. Jason Statham (http://www.jackiekcooper.com/VideoColumns/JasonStratham.jpg) Why stick another pretty boy in there, switch up the franchise... Statham would be better at the action than Clive. At least Clive got to do soft-core porn with Natalie Portman. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on March 13, 2005, 11:27:33 PM Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on March 13, 2005, 11:28:48 PM Closer. Terrible fucking movie. Try to find an .avi of the scene or something. They don't deserve your money. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on March 14, 2005, 02:02:36 PM Any got a link? My Google-Fu is weak today it seems.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on March 14, 2005, 02:34:10 PM Any got a link? My Google-Fu is weak today it seems. It's this scene (http://www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0376541/Ss/0376541/SG-02.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0376541). I'm not hunting a video down for you. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on March 14, 2005, 03:55:15 PM Everything I came up with was either a still, in Russian, or some kinda pay-to-download deal.
Oh well. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SirBruce on March 14, 2005, 04:48:35 PM Mmmm, pink hair....
Bruce Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Arnold on March 14, 2005, 10:04:59 PM Sean Connery would be worth 42 million...or more. It would be the BIGGEST BOND MOVIE EVER. Except his Bond vehicle would be a Lincoln Towncar, and he'd chase villans with the left turn blinker on the whole way. You think he's a bit old? Hehe, I'm still chuckling about that. I still think he could do it. That guy from the Highlander TV show looks like a young Connery. They should have him do it. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on March 31, 2005, 09:20:21 AM Quote from: The Scoop Vince Vaughn is unhappy with the level of professionalism in Hollywood. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7047010/) The 35-year-old actor, who has starred in such classics as “Starsky and Hutch” and “Thumbsucker” and who is rumored to be the top choice as the new James Bond — bemoaned how today’s stars just don’t take the time to study their craft. “When I got to LA, I took more classes. I always wanted new information,” the “Be Cool” star tells the April/May issue of Complex magazine. “That was what we all tried to do back then. It’s different now. There’s a real focus on trying to be really famous or coming off really cool and, in Hollywood, it’s not cool to try at something. It’s much cooler to have never taken acting classes, to act like you don’t care, to not try.” Vince Vaughn is up for Bond? Excuse me? WTF? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on March 31, 2005, 09:21:12 AM This Vodka martini is so fucking money and it doesn't even know it!
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: HaemishM on March 31, 2005, 09:29:58 AM Should Vaughn actually get the role, Ian Fleming's zombie corpse will rise from the grave and anally rape every executive involved. Not that Vaughn wouldn't do well, it just seems like some kind of unholy sacrilege not to at least get a native of the UK (or Australia) to do the job.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on March 31, 2005, 09:55:49 AM You shouldn't have to feign the accent to do Bond. That's my take.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on April 02, 2005, 10:12:15 AM Closer. Terrible fucking movie. Try to find an .avi of the scene or something. They don't deserve your money. Apparently my mother had picked up the DVD at some point. Horrible scene, not even "softcore pr0n". I'd stab myself before watching this the whole way through, just like AI. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on April 02, 2005, 11:07:00 AM Has anyone mentioned Rufus Sewell as a possible Bond? He might be able to pull it off.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Murgos on April 06, 2005, 11:21:25 AM http://icseftonandwestlancs.icnetwork.co.uk/icsouthport/nationalnews/tm_objectid=15371332&method=full&siteid=60252&headline=daniel-craig--the-next-james-bond--name_page.html
Quote Actor Daniel Craig is to be the next James Bond, it has been reported. He has been offered a three-film deal by producer Barbara Broccoli, according to The Sun. Craig, 37, starred in the gangster film Layer Cake. The newspaper said he had been competing with fellow British actor Clive Owen to take over from Pierce Brosnan. However, Owen had told casting agents he did not want the job as he feared it might limit his career. Other names mentioned at different times in connection with the 007 role have included Eric Bana, Jude Law, Heath Ledger, Ewan McGregor, Dougray Scott and Australian Hugh Jackman (http://nicrator.free.fr/images/film5f3.jpg) edit: I think Clive Owen would have made a great Bond and I'm glad to see he was in final contention. Even if I think it makes him a dumbass to pass up what will probably a guaranteed $100 mil minimum payoff. I don't think I know this guy at all. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on April 06, 2005, 11:26:00 AM Never heard of him. I'm entirely uninterested in Bond now.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2005, 11:35:30 AM Never heard of him. I'm entirely uninterested in Bond now. Has your mancrush on Clive Owen evaporated now? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on April 06, 2005, 11:36:45 AM Never heard of him. I'm entirely uninterested in Bond now. Has your mancrush on Clive Owen evaporated now?Liking a guys work isn't a mancrush. Clive Owen does good work when he isn't handed absolute shit. The number of actors in the world vs. the number of good actor's is terrible. Clive's one of the good ones. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2005, 11:40:54 AM Never heard of him. I'm entirely uninterested in Bond now. Has your mancrush on Clive Owen evaporated now?Liking a guys work isn't a mancrush. Clive Owen does good work when he isn't handed absolute shit. The number of actors in the world vs. the number of good actor's is terrible. Clive's one of the good ones. So.....no Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: MaceVanHoffen on April 06, 2005, 01:47:17 PM Has your mancrush on Clive Owen evaporated now? Liking a guys work isn't a mancrush. Clive Owen does good work when he isn't handed absolute shit. The number of actors in the world vs. the number of good actor's is terrible. Clive's one of the good ones. So.....no My mancrush on Clive Owen is still going strong. I want to have his manbabies. Especially after Sin City. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Furiously on April 06, 2005, 02:37:15 PM I'd really like to see some decent scripts for the next few 007 movies.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Murgos on April 06, 2005, 02:54:35 PM I'd really like to see some decent scripts for the next few 007 movies. Hahahahahahahaha...Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2005, 08:18:24 PM I'd really like to see some decent scripts for the next few 007 movies. Hahahahahahahaha...The next Bond girl will probably be named Gimi Moorewood, and she'll help James find and destroy caches of weapons hidden deep in the deserts of the middle east, with sexy results. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on April 06, 2005, 08:20:19 PM Don't forget, she'll be played by Nikki Cox or someone equally busty. And be a rocket scientist on the side. Normally a brain surgeon with a love of advanced botany.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Paelos on April 06, 2005, 08:23:08 PM Don't forget, she'll be played by Nikki Cox or someone equally busty. And be a rocket scientist on the side. Normally a brain surgeon with a love of advanced botany. You know what, they should get Dan Brown to write it. He has that nailed. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on April 06, 2005, 08:25:02 PM I just scrolled up and looked at the new bond again.
I got depressed. Go figure. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Triforcer on April 06, 2005, 11:50:38 PM The Bond scripts have been lame ever since the Soviet Union went under. Now they fight moguls who want to take over the world's media or people who want to blow up an oil pipeline. Given the dearth of supervillain white nations currently, they have to keep doing the same as it wouldn't be PC to take on Islam. He'll probably fight the IRA or a businessman who wants to slightly destabilize Icelandic currency in order to collapse a CIA arm funded by Haitian penny stocks.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Abagadro on April 06, 2005, 11:54:04 PM He should take on Hank Scorpio in the next one.
Bond has been crap since old man Broccoli died. Oh, and I also have a mancrush on Clive Owen. And Gregory Peck. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on April 06, 2005, 11:56:40 PM Oh, and I also have a mancrush on Clive Owen. And Gregory Peck. You've been drinking again, haven't you? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Abagadro on April 07, 2005, 12:01:07 AM Yes.
I just dropped a grand to lousy suck-out bastards while 4-tabling 5/10 limit hold 'em, so now I am into the bourbon. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Mortriden on April 07, 2005, 08:11:49 AM Next time just send it my way and I'll tell you how great you are... then put the money to good use.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: HaemishM on April 07, 2005, 09:28:27 AM I think at this point in the franchise, it's almost immaterial who Bond is because the script is doomed to suck ass. Only, it will suck ass according to a perfect formula of suckiness. They really need to re-read the Fleming books, and go back to that tonality. It could still be perfectly relevant in today's society.
But they won't do that. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Miasma on April 07, 2005, 10:37:04 AM (http://film.onet.pl/_i/plotki/duze/d/daniel_craig_1.jpg)
I'm hoping the picked a less "dashingly handsome" person because they do intend to go back to Bond being a gritty assassin. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Abagadro on April 07, 2005, 03:07:13 PM I really need to stop posting while intoxicated.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on April 07, 2005, 03:38:29 PM I really need to stop posting while intoxicated. Never! Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: SnotBag on April 19, 2005, 09:57:45 AM Any got a link? My Google-Fu is weak today it seems. NSFW http://deansplanet.com/natalie_portman-stripper_pole.html Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Strazos on April 19, 2005, 06:07:05 PM Any got a link? My Google-Fu is weak today it seems. NSFW http://deansplanet.com/natalie_portman-stripper_pole.html Apparently my mother had picked up the DVD at some point. Horrible scene, not even "softcore pr0n". I'd stab myself before watching this the whole way through, just like AI. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on April 19, 2005, 06:07:46 PM Yes, "Closer" is a terrible fucking movie. And a waste of every single actor in it.
Didn't I say that the first time it was mentioned? I do think so. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on August 17, 2005, 10:28:39 AM Quote from: Local 10 Brosnan Told His Bond Days Are Over (http://www.local10.com/entertainment/4863326/detail.html) POSTED: 12:51 pm EDT August 17, 2005 UPDATED: 1:07 pm EDT August 17, 2005 NEW YORK -- Pierce Brosnan was apparently shaken, but not stirred when he was told his days of playing James Bond were over. Brosnan told Entertainment Weekly he got a surprising phone call telling him his services as James Bond were no longer needed. He said at first it was a "titanic jolt to the system" but it was followed by "a great sense of calm." Brosnan said he has a "sense of liberation" now that the days of playing Bond are officially behind him. "I can do anything I want to do now," Brosnan told the magazine. "I'm not beholden to them or anyone. I'm not shackled by some contracted image." The actor said he never felt complete ownership of the Bond character because he would have to say "stupid one-liners," which he said he loathed. Brosnan, 52, starred in four James Bond movies. The first came in 1995 with "GoldenEye," which was followed by "Tomorrow Never Dies," "The World Is Not Enough" and "Die Another Day." The actor starred in television's "Remington Steele" when he was first was offered to replace Roger Moore as Bond role in the 1980s, but had to decline it due to contractual obligations to the show. Welsh actor Timothy Dalton (who was actually offered the role after the original Bond, Sean Connery, quit for the first time) took the role instead. Dalton did two Bond movies before the franchise got caught up in legal entanglements. When things were settled, Dalton declined to continue and Brosnan was offered -- and took -- the role of the famed character. In addition to the Bond movies, Brosnan's screen credits include "Mrs. Doubtfire," "The Thomas Crown Affair" and "Laws of Attraction." Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: shiznitz on August 18, 2005, 11:02:13 AM How could they ignore The Tailor of Panama? His character in that movie is how the real James Bond would act (i.e.self-interested scamster) if such a person could actually exist.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: AOFanboi on August 19, 2005, 09:04:51 AM How could they ignore The Tailor of Panama? His character in that movie is how the real James Bond would act (i.e.self-interested scamster) if such a person could actually exist. That movie was based on a very good book by a very good author, and hence was by implication better than the Bonds.Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on August 25, 2005, 02:03:35 PM Quote from: Sci Fi Wire Visnjic Up For 007? (http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?category=0&id=32176) TV Guide columnist Michael Ausiello reported a rumor that Goran Visnjic (Elektra) is under consideration for the role of James Bond. Ausiello offers no source for his report that the Croatian-born actor, best known as Dr. Luka Kovac on NBC's ER, is under consideration for the role, last filled by Pierce Brosnan. "Yes, it's true," Ausiello writes. "But should he get the role, it wouldn't mean the end of Kovac." Ausiello quotes ER executive producer David Zabel as saying that the production could film a bunch of stuff with Kovac at one time for later episodes or that Visnjic could work on both at the same time. Hugh Jackman has reportedly turned down the 007 role. The next Bond movie is a remake of Casino Royale. No.. just no. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Llava on August 25, 2005, 02:09:33 PM Just hire Vin Diesel! You know you want to! He was born to be Bond... X-TREME BOND!!!
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on October 12, 2005, 12:00:08 PM Quote from: Hollywood Reporter Daniel Craig odds-on favorite for 007 (http://www.detnews.com/2005/screens/0510/12/ent-346618.htm) By Tatiana Siegel / The Hollywood Reporter (http://www.detnews.com/pix/2005/10/12/entwire/craig.jpg) British actor Daniel Craig might be holding the winning hand in the James Bond/"Casino Royale" sweepstakes. Most handicappers have had Craig, star of this summer's "Layer Cake," on the shortlist for some time, and on Tuesday, London's Daily Mail upped the ante by reporting that Craig will indeed fill the shoes of the mythic Agent 007. Separately, sources close to the project say the actor is close to being officially tapped as the new Bond. In keeping with its tight-lipped policy regarding "Casino Royale," a spokesman for Sony Pictures, which will release the gambling-themed Bond film -- scheduled to go before the cameras in early 2006 under Martin Campbell's direction -- said: "We are not commenting on rumors. When we have an announcement to make, we will let you know." In May, Craig addressed the Bond scuttlebutt during an interview with online movie news Web site IGN FilmForce. "There's a lot of rumors floating around," he said. "It's not a bad position to be in. If even half of them or a third of them are true, it's not a bad position to be in." Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on October 12, 2005, 12:06:10 PM He'll make a great Bond.
And posterchild for the third reich. Motherfucker. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on October 12, 2005, 12:09:55 PM But..But..Don't you like Third Reich "style" at least?
Yes, I know you're Jewish, and this isn't a sick joke, but I could have sworn... Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on October 12, 2005, 12:22:38 PM I'm not offended and I also have no clue what you're talking about. What's "third reich" style?
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on October 12, 2005, 12:30:53 PM Armbands. You're crazy for armbands.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on October 12, 2005, 12:31:02 PM Haha.
Immaculate grey SS uniforms? Black, knee high boots? I thought I had heard you mention a liking for it when you wanted to make a "6th Column" guild in CoH. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: schild on October 12, 2005, 12:33:33 PM Armbands. You're crazy for armbands. You mean tattoos. Stray, it was all a reference to the Bazooko's Circus stuff from Hunter S. Thompson. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on October 12, 2005, 12:39:02 PM Gotcha...
Seriously though, for the longest time you confused the shit out of me. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: koboshi on October 13, 2005, 11:08:04 AM Just finished watching layer cake and unfortunately Daniel Craig will probably make a damn fine bond. I mean I have couple of actors I'd rather see in the role (Clive Owen, Ewan McGregor, Jude Law) but this guy has the bond cool that any actor who might take on the mantle needs.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Soln on October 13, 2005, 11:50:59 AM hopefully he'll be able to reproduce the general tone of the early Bonds. For me, its typified by From Russia with Love, and that great scene in Dr.No where Bond shoots that scientist in cold blood in his cabana. That's the kind of Bond I always liked -- Cold!
(http://www.mdf.ru/i/photo/010/10469.jpg) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Shockeye on October 15, 2005, 01:26:40 PM Quote from: Scifi Wire It's Official: Craig's 007 (http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?category=0&id=32825) As expected, English actor Daniel Craig (Layer Cake) was announced as the new James Bond on Oct. 14 in a news conference in London, ending months of speculation over who would take over from Pierce Brosnan as 007, the Reuters news service reported. The 37-year-old actor swept up the River Thames on a power launch to a news conference, escorted by Royal Marines boats, the news service reported. Craig will become the first blond Bond and told reporters: "I'm kind of speechless at the moment." The casting of one of cinema's most iconic characters closes the successful four-film run of Irishman Brosnan. Craig will make his debut as the martini-swilling superspy in Casino Royale, the 21st Bond film, which starts shooting in January. Craig's hiring ends months of speculation about who would replace Brosnan. Candidates included Britons Clive Owen and Jude Law, Australia's Hugh Jackman and TV's Goran Visnjic. Only five actors have played Bond since the first film, Dr. No, more than 40 years ago. Brosnan, Sean Connery and Roger Moore were well-loved mainstays as the secret agent, while George Lazenby and Timothy Dalton were less successful. Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Ironwood on October 17, 2005, 07:19:13 AM Yeah, it's always a good idea not to arrive kinda speechless to a news conference.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Yegolev on October 17, 2005, 10:51:20 AM Things named "Casino Royale" have a habit of sucking.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Bunk on October 18, 2005, 03:32:53 PM Quote from: Scifi Wire It's Official: Craig's 007 (http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?category=0&id=32825) Craig's hiring ends months of speculation about who would replace Brosnan. Candidates included Britons Clive Owen and Jude Law, Australia's Hugh Jackman and TV's Goran Visnjic. err? Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Yegolev on October 18, 2005, 09:44:09 PM Tuvaloo's Goran Visnjic.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: TheWalrus on October 18, 2005, 10:45:47 PM Gesundheit. You were saying?
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Trippy on May 03, 2006, 12:00:49 AM Necro!
French language Casino Royale trailer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVd-Sqc7hMw) Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: stray on May 03, 2006, 12:28:42 AM Still looks a little over the top, but not as bad I thought it'd be.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Signe on May 03, 2006, 05:21:27 AM Wasn't Casino Royale the Bond spoof? That didn't look like a spoof!
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: tar on May 03, 2006, 06:04:52 AM There was a Casino Royale bond spoof film (David Niven?) but it's also the first novel.
Title: Re: "The name is Bond. Moneygrubbing Bond." Post by: Sky on May 03, 2006, 06:58:25 AM We saw Casino Royale (http://imdb.com/title/tt0061452/) a couple weeks ago (Starring Peter Sellers, Niven, Orson Welles, Woody Allen, etc). It's technically a spoof, but we kept wondering if it was made while LSD was still legal. It made little sense and was totally fucking bizarre.
|