Title: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 11, 2010, 11:45:57 AM http://battlestar-galactica.bigpoint.com/
http://gamertube.com/video-1840068-Battlestar Galactica: E3 2010 Trailer Dang it, there goes my chances of being funded and getting this IP for a game I have had in my head for years now. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Pezzle on June 11, 2010, 12:02:48 PM Maybe if it was the 1978 version..
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 11, 2010, 12:06:53 PM Maybe if it was the 1978 version.. :ye_gods:Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: HaemishM on June 11, 2010, 12:24:49 PM Fuck's sake, WHY? How do you win, by leaving your ship on auto pilot to crash into the sun while you frolic in a loincloth?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Numtini on June 11, 2010, 12:28:52 PM It makes no sense to make a game out of a property that is done and over.
(Unless someone's going to fund Larson's lunatic idea to remake the original series with all its anti-democratic right wing aspects intact.) Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 11, 2010, 01:42:17 PM You don't get it. It's a sandbox! How many humans were alive after the Cylon nuking of the 12 colonies? 47000? You are one of them, and since it's skill based (no levels) you can become anything from a lawyer to a marine, from a journalist to a viper pilot, from a mechanic specialist to a cook in one of the many cantinas. No one can play a officer, a commander, or the President. In the meantime, war rages on. I guess you can call it Galactica Galaxies.
(I am really curious to actually find out where the hell are they going with this). Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ghambit on June 11, 2010, 05:10:23 PM Dont we have a BSGO thread in the browsergame section or something?
Also, where are people getting design info. on this thing? How do we know it's a sandbox? Gimme quotes. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 11, 2010, 05:53:11 PM No, I made that up. The irony got lost in translation.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 11, 2010, 05:54:28 PM No, I made that up. The irony got lost in translation. You got him all excited. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ghambit on June 11, 2010, 06:28:06 PM Fucker.
I've already x-ed out the fall season 'cause of this thing. Then again, I've also started drafting nerdragey hatemail for Bigpoint if/when it bombs. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 11, 2010, 11:21:34 PM That 'if' was cute.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Modern Angel on June 12, 2010, 04:52:51 AM Maybe if it was the 1978 version.. Seconding. Starbuck is a fucking dude and Lorne Greene or gtfo. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 12, 2010, 05:19:02 AM What's cool in Starbuck being a dude?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Pezzle on June 12, 2010, 06:42:50 AM What's cool about changing Starbuck into a chick?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 12, 2010, 06:51:14 AM What's cool about changing Starbuck into a chick? Katee Sackhoff. More seriously, diversity. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: TripleDES on June 12, 2010, 06:56:40 AM No newtonian physics flight model. Fuk dat.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Modern Angel on June 12, 2010, 07:00:45 AM Fuck diversity. LORNE GREENE.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Sir T on June 12, 2010, 12:54:03 PM (http://media.battlestarwiki.org/images/4/40/AdamaLL1.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Sir T on June 12, 2010, 01:02:03 PM In fact
(http://media.battlestarwiki.org/images/3/3d/The_Hand_of_God_%28TOS%29.jpg) or gtfo. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 12, 2010, 01:43:15 PM No newtonian physics flight model. Fuk dat. Newton is deeeeeeeeeeeead! Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 12, 2010, 01:52:27 PM Stop being silly and dissing the new Galactica. Why you people didn't complain in 1987 when they made a new, silly Star Trek?
Now, get off my Battlestar. Dismissed. (http://www.hotflick.net/flicks/1982_Blade_Runner/982BLR_Edward_James_Olmos_001.jpg) Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Chimpy on June 12, 2010, 02:35:38 PM Any show with Dirk Benedict is inherently greater than the same show sans Dirk Benedict.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Pezzle on June 12, 2010, 03:28:34 PM Diversity my ass. If you want to make a new story you do not need to use the same characters. I am not going to sit here and bash the new Galactica, it was simply not interesting enough for me. It dragged on and lost my interest. The point is, why remake something? Why not do something new with the franchise?
As for the Star Trek comments, were you reading this board in 1987? Sure it was the same ship name but the crew was different and played different roles. Different names, different expectations. If you want to reskin things I will take the original, thanks. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 12, 2010, 04:02:42 PM Why you people didn't complain in 1987 when they made a new, silly Star Trek? The fuck we didn't. Also, they could have had hot chick Viper pilots AND Dirk Benedict. I don't know why they didn't. I can't imagine he would have been asking for that much money since he hasn't worked since the seventies. With that said, she wasn't a bad character. She just should never have been saddled with the 'Starbuck' moniker. It made it stupid. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Modern Angel on June 12, 2010, 04:37:23 PM Not to mention that TNG wasn't exactly a purported remake of the original series. BSG was them taking a fun, cheesy Star Wars ripoff space opera and turned it into some half-assed character study for people who think Dragonlance is literature.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 12, 2010, 05:13:17 PM Not to mention that TNG wasn't exactly a purported remake of the original series. BSG was them taking a fun, cheesy Star Wars ripoff space opera and turned it into some half-assed character study for people who think Dragonlance is literature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZm47SrmuwM Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Chimpy on June 12, 2010, 06:33:13 PM Not to mention that TNG wasn't exactly a purported remake of the original series. BSG was them taking a fun, cheesy Star Wars ripoff space opera and turned it into some half-assed character study for people who think Dragonlance is literature. Oh man, that is sig worth commentary right there. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 13, 2010, 02:26:19 AM Quote Quote from: Modern Angel on June 12, 2010, 05:37:23 pm BSG was them taking a fun, cheesy Star Wars ripoff space opera and turned it into some half-assed character study for people who think Dragonlance is literature. On sunday morning, after a rough night, I can't do better than this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Battlestar_Galactica). Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 13, 2010, 02:45:08 AM I'm just going to post here and say this:
The new Battlestar was an amazing series (no matter how bad you thought the ending itself was) and about a billion times better than the original. I mean literally, every single actor in the new series is greater than any actor from the old series in every single way. They were all shitty inferiors. The worst thing the new battlestar had going for it was the fact that it had the name "Battlestar Galactica" in its name, a well known shitty series. It would probably have done better if it had been named differently. The new battlestar is the ONLY Battlestar, and I'll forgot there was anything before it from here on. You can all go fuck yourselves. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 13, 2010, 08:48:28 AM The original show was Battlestar Ponderosa. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Simond on June 13, 2010, 09:11:14 AM Wait, there's people who prefer the 70's BSG to the remake, and not in a "secretly ironic" way? :uhrr:
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Modern Angel on June 13, 2010, 11:30:03 AM Or they're both terrible because genre fiction almost universally sucks but one BSG was a fun romp while the other was ponderous tripe.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 13, 2010, 12:37:09 PM The new Battlestar was an amazing series until it turned into Days of our Lives in space.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Margalis on June 14, 2010, 12:25:20 AM Original BSG was laughably bad, well behind even stuff like Buck Rogers. For something to be a "fun romp" it has to actually be fun rather than being painfully bad.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Cyrrex on June 14, 2010, 06:40:18 AM I'm just going to post here and say this: The new Battlestar was an amazing series (no matter how bad you thought the ending itself was) and about a billion times better than the original. I mean literally, every single actor in the new series is greater than any actor from the old series in every single way. They were all shitty inferiors. The worst thing the new battlestar had going for it was the fact that it had the name "Battlestar Galactica" in its name, a well known shitty series. It would probably have done better if it had been named differently. The new battlestar is the ONLY Battlestar, and I'll forgot there was anything before it from here on. You can all go fuck yourselves. This. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Shatter on June 14, 2010, 07:56:52 AM The new Battlestar was an amazing series until it turned into Days of our Lives in space. This. Its also why Stargate Universe sucks, its EMOgate. I dont give a shit that X character's dad touched her when she was 11 and thats why she has relationship issues, go through the dam stargate and shoot some motherf*cking bad guys. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 14, 2010, 09:14:33 AM I don't think the point is that the old one was good in any quantifiable way, outside of Dirk Benedict's awesomeness. The point is that the new one is really overrated. I was okay with the new one until the fat suit. Pretty much everything after that sucked sweaty balls.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: tazelbain on June 14, 2010, 11:02:20 AM I was in it until Baltar's trial.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: HaemishM on June 14, 2010, 12:28:40 PM What's cool about changing Starbuck into a Fixed that for you. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Cyrrex on June 14, 2010, 12:33:23 PM What's cool about changing Starbuck into a Fixed that for you. Wat. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 14, 2010, 12:34:00 PM What's cool about changing Starbuck into a Fixed that for you. Even if it was the case, what's wrong with that? Even more diversity, which is good. Leave transexuals alone, please. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 14, 2010, 12:35:24 PM I think they are a bit incomparable, one was a campy family show, the other, wasn't. Whatever you may think of it.
Lets talk about Galactica 1980 now. With the scusess of games like farmvile, it might just work! Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: HaemishM on June 14, 2010, 12:36:05 PM I'm saying I've seen manly trannies that are hotter than Katie Sackoff.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Cyrrex on June 14, 2010, 12:37:29 PM I'm saying I've seen manly trannies that are hotter than Katie Sackoff. Maybe you just like you some trannies. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: HaemishM on June 14, 2010, 12:54:13 PM As long as they don't look like Katie Sackoff. :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 14, 2010, 03:02:46 PM The new Battlestar was an amazing series until it turned into Days of our Lives in space. Fair enough, but most of that was limited to the second half of the series (while if you don't think the first two seasons were some of the best TV ever made, your just plain broken), which is why the second half was less than stellar (most of it was in the 3rd season actually). Even then, it was only a small portion of the show, and season 3&4 were still quite good on the whole.As to the MMO, its a browser based game...... I'm having a hard time seeing it be very advanced, or even fun... Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Sir T on June 15, 2010, 02:54:54 AM My friends were beginning to bitch "So, where are the Cylons/space battles/action?" even in the second half of season 1. Hate to stun you but the emo was there from the start.
You can safely say that only 1 in 3 episodes of the original series were good, but those good episodes were very good, and the whole thing was fun. At least it didn't have the Cylons as emo immoral nymphomaniacs. Now Galactica 1980. THAT was pure shit. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 15, 2010, 06:50:25 AM My friends were beginning to bitch "So, where are the Cylons/space battles/action?" even in the second half of season 1. Hate to stun you but the emo was there from the start. Sure, but I could squint my eyes and pretend that it wasn't a soap opera for the first couple of seasons. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Slyfeind on June 15, 2010, 06:58:41 AM There were space battles in the new BSG?
And the original had more diversity. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 15, 2010, 08:41:20 AM My friends were beginning to bitch "So, where are the Cylons/space battles/action?" even in the second half of season 1. Hate to stun you but the emo was there from the start. It was a character drama with great characters, set in space, with sporadic AMAZING space battles (just not constantly). It was a modern space opera. It was only "emo" starting into season 3 when they did those horrible character episodes and really started to fuck with the characters because they were running out of idea's. Unless you consider anything resembling drama "emo". I find the bitching about "space battles" funny as well, since there was still plenty of action and tension throughout the series, and the outright battles were some of the best space battles I've ever seen.You can safely say that only 1 in 3 episodes of the original series were good, but those good episodes were very good, and the whole thing was fun. At least it didn't have the Cylons as emo immoral nymphomaniacs. Now Galactica 1980. THAT was pure shit. In any event: Wait, there's people who prefer the 70's BSG to the remake, and not in a "secretly ironic" way? :uhrr: Yes. :oh_i_see:Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Khaldun on June 15, 2010, 08:50:45 AM Muffit and Boxey.
Muffit and Boxey. MUFFIT and BOXEY. Like, that's the standard unit of kids-in-shows hideousness. "Hey, Wesley on Star Trek: the Next Generation was about 5.6 Muffitboxies, I think." "Yeah, but Will Robinson only was about .75 Muffitboxies, he was pretty decent." Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 15, 2010, 10:37:20 AM Hey now. Boxey turned out to be Atreyu.
Also. Teleku. You're overselling it. The series was overrated. There are major parts of it that are totally laughable. And for a character study, it had some pretty weak characters. Baltar, President Stands with a Fist, Apollo, the Asian Cylon (though hot), the One-eyed Canadian Woodsman First Officer in space - these characters all sucked balls for various reasons. It is not the best TV ever made. It's not even in the discussion. It's among some of the best SciFi TV made recently. And quite frankly, that's not saying too much. It's a hell of a lot better than Caprica. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 15, 2010, 12:18:19 PM I'm fine with people not liking it (though I think your crazy, but hey, to each there own). It's more the fact that I can't even begin to wrap my head around people actually liking the older one better than the new one. The old one had a decent pilot/movie, and very quickly became completely unwatchable in every single way. Even if you hate the new one you'd have to agree it had some semblance of story telling and depth. GI Joe had more depth and story than the original BSG.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Reg on June 15, 2010, 12:25:40 PM The old one was awful. It was so awful that Star Trek fans wouldn't watch it even though it was the only science fiction on television at the time. Instead we'd just watch reruns of the original trek while waiting for the movie.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 15, 2010, 02:30:11 PM GI Joe had more depth and story than the original BSG. The original Battlestar had more depth than most of the shit that was on TV in 1978. I'd be willing to bet that most of the people here who are disagreeing with you had the misfortune of being alive in a time when Laverne & Shirley was the top rated show on TV. Also. Star Trek fans watched the old BSG too. You're not fooling anyone. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: ghost on June 15, 2010, 02:34:16 PM I'm holding out for Firefly online :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Soulflame on June 15, 2010, 03:33:22 PM How many of you are even old enough to have watched the original run of BSG? :geezer:
It was decent for the time. I watched the whole run, and while I can't say it was excellent, it wasn't outright terrible. At least compared to whatever else you could watch on TV. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Reg on June 15, 2010, 04:05:34 PM I'm old enough. And I hated it as did all my nerdy Trekkie friends. To be fair though I was in university and heavy drinking won out over TV viewing every time.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Lantyssa on June 15, 2010, 04:08:04 PM I watched the original. A little younger than Reg, but I loved it. Probably because anything sci-fi held my interest.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Pezzle on June 15, 2010, 04:15:29 PM Watched it and liked it enough to keep watching. The new BSG had me wandering off because it was boring.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Threash on June 15, 2010, 04:17:06 PM I liked the old one fine, but i was like five. New one was completely redemeed by cool space battles + incredibly hot half naked cylons, the rest of it sucked horribly.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Reg on June 15, 2010, 04:17:32 PM I bet you guys identified with Boxie and wanted a robot dog just like his!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Lantyssa on June 15, 2010, 04:43:00 PM I did! Also wanted a Cylon.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: UnSub on June 15, 2010, 06:22:50 PM I'm holding out for Firefly online :awesome_for_real: First announced in 2006. (http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/12/72263) :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Trippy on June 15, 2010, 07:46:19 PM How many of you are even old enough to have watched the original run of BSG? :geezer: I watched the original run as a kid. The episode where Jane Seymour's character dies scarred me for life :oh_i_see:It was decent for the time. I watched the whole run, and while I can't say it was excellent, it wasn't outright terrible. At least compared to whatever else you could watch on TV. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: raydeen on June 15, 2010, 07:57:56 PM I watched the original when it was on. I still love watching the reruns on Hulu. It's a show from a different time, place and perspective. I hold the old and new in the highest regard with the only shows that currently beat them out being Doctor Who (all of it) and Babylon 5.
The thing that was so cool about the original was the fact that there wasn't one piece of fake computer prop on the bridge of the Galactica. It was actually all medical diagnostic equipment and that's why it looked so damn good (for the time). I still think it does. And viper helmets. God I want a Colonial Viper helmet. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Abagadro on June 15, 2010, 08:00:31 PM The original was pretty cool back in the day. It was appointment television for my 8 year old self. Many of the problems with it were attributable to being rushed in its production and its limited budget. For what they had to work with they pulled off some pretty cool shit.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 15, 2010, 09:23:29 PM I did! Also wanted a Cylon. Fuck that. I was terrified of the Cylons. They were my Daleks. :uhrr: :grin: Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Pezzle on June 15, 2010, 10:49:41 PM EXTERMINATE!! EXTERMINATE!!
Now those were good frighting times. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Lantyssa on June 16, 2010, 05:28:35 AM Daleks were cute! I dunno why, but I never found aliens on TV shows frightening, even the baddies. Maybe I understood intuitively from an early age that anything which wanted to wipe out the human race had the right idea. ;D
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Nebu on June 16, 2010, 08:20:10 AM Jesus Christ, what's next: Buck Rogers Online?
Star Trek Online: FAIL Star Wars Online: FAIL If you can't make it work with those licenses, why not just use a little creativity and make a failure with your own name on it. That was the recipe for Tabula Rasa. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Pezzle on June 16, 2010, 08:30:38 AM Why not Buck Rogers? There might be a remake of the TV show on the way. Perfect timing!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Abagadro on June 16, 2010, 08:44:34 AM If they can digitize Erin Gray (circa 1980) in a cat suit I'm all for it.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Falconeer on June 16, 2010, 08:56:26 AM Jesus Christ, what's next: Buck Rogers Online? Star Trek Online: FAIL Star Wars Online: FAIL If you can't make it work with those licenses, why not just use a little creativity and make a failure with your own name on it. That was the recipe for Tabula Rasa. Stargate Online Firefly Online Mass Effect Online? That might work. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 16, 2010, 09:40:44 AM If they can digitize Erin Gray (circa 1980) in a cat suit I'm all for it. Yes, pls. Also. (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/963220/300px-scorpius2.jpg) This needs to be a shitty MMO. I'd play it no matter what. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Mrbloodworth on June 29, 2010, 08:03:02 AM Quote Bigpoint Games, a successful publisher of many casual free-to-play MMOs in Europe, was recently revealed as heading up a new MMO based on the Battlestar Galactica IP. We literally knew just about nothing else about the game until the reveal of the game's first trailer just before E3 , where we learned that we'd be able to play as either Humans or Cylons. Needless to say we were intrigued to find out more about the game when E3 rolled around, and so I stopped by the Bigpoint booth on the E3 show floor to find out what the game was all about. advertisement To start, Battlestar Galactica is not a full fledged traditional MMO that you might be expecting from such a significant IP. Instead, the game will be a fairly casual free-to-play browser-based MMO developed on the extremely versatile Unity engine that appears to be so popular with developers these days. For the uninitiated, Battlestar Galactica is based off of the recent reboot of the popular 70's sci-fi series of the same name where humans create robotic beings known as Cylons to assist them as soldiers of war. In true sci-fi fashion they eventually turn on their Human masters. The Cylons were actually quite successful in their near genocide, eradicating all but roughly 50,000 humans who escape along with the Battlestar Galactica (an aging human warship) to settle elsewhere in the galaxy, but are subsequently pursued by the relentless Cylons. The game is set following the events of season two of the 2003 re-imagining of the series and is focused primarily on combat, though there will be a number of minable resources and economy features, however our Bigpoint rep was unable to provide any further details here. Battlestar Galactica Online features a hybrid skill based and level based system, where players can eventually learn just about any skill but will also be able to ascend various ranks. Like EVE Online (at least for now), Jumpgate Evolution and Black Prophecy, Battlestar Galactica Online will not feature any ground based interaction as players will be restricted to their ships, which by the way, will be customizable in a number of ways. I was given a brief demo of pre-alpha BSG:O gameplay, which I was genuinely surprised to see as I'd honestly expected a brief introduction to the game, but I was pleasantly surprised that Bigpoint was confident enough to show off their game. The person demoing the game was flying a medium sized starfighter that appeared to have an action-y control scheme similar to Jumpgate Evolution. We weren't shown too much of the game, but we could see the Battlestar Galactica itself out in the distance. I also noticed an experience bar and some hotkeyed abilities. Given the fact that BSG:O is a free-to-play title I had to ask about how Bigpoint plans on going about implementing the item shop with this game. The Bigpoint rep revealed that your typical item shop trappings will be available containing convenience items and fluff, but that we'd also be seeing gameplay affecting items in the shop as well. I raised this as a concern, given that while Western games are slowly warming up to the Free to Play model, many of us are decidedly against items that affect gameplay. I was told that in Europe, players are fairly accepting of this sort of thing, and they don't anticipate it to be a huge issue here in the US. I guess we'll have to find out when the game launches later this year. (http://images.mmorpg.com/features/4349/images/4349_1.jpg) (http://images.mmorpg.com/features/4349/images/4349_2.jpg) Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: eldaec on June 29, 2010, 11:17:05 AM The game is set following the events of season two of the 2003 re-imagining of the series and is focused primarily on combat, Am I getting confused, or is that the part where Lee puts on a fatsuit, the two battlestars float about pointlessly with a skeleton crew because there is nothing to fight, and the rest of the human population sit around on Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 29, 2010, 11:36:29 AM I think what they probably meant is after the new Caprica arc, which was just the first few episodes of season 3. That time frame would make much more sense then during new caprica (or before it for that matter).
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 29, 2010, 01:43:59 PM Quote Like EVE Online (at least for now), Jumpgate Evolution and Black Prophecy, Battlestar Galactica Online will not feature any ground based interaction as players will be restricted to their ships, which by the way, will be customizable in a number of ways. I don't think this game will appeal to the average nuBSG fan. I predict a niche of a niche title. Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Teleku on June 29, 2010, 04:34:49 PM Eh, I think they're are plenty of non-BSG fan's who will happily play it (if its actually decent). Its a free to play space sim game, that's all anybody needs to know, or will care about. It's not like people who don't know about or care about BSG wouldn't try it either. Weather its called BSG or Jumpgate only matters in how many extra people you can lure to play it due to name recognition.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: sinij on June 30, 2010, 07:16:57 PM Anyone complaining about new Galactica needs to re-watch original to refresh your mind on how awful most of it really was.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Musashi on June 30, 2010, 07:21:58 PM Anyone complaining how old Galactica is more awful than new Galactica needs to go back in time and flip through the 8 available channels.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Ratman_tf on June 30, 2010, 11:39:41 PM Anyone complaining about new Galactica needs to re-watch original to refresh your mind on how awful most of it really was. So? Pointing out the sins of the first show doesn't excuse the ones of the new. And I have a high tolerance for cheese, so I'd probably enjoy revisiting oBSG. I recently re-watched Buck Rogers on Hulu, and still loved it. :grin: Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Chimpy on July 01, 2010, 05:16:09 AM Anyone complaining how old Galactica is more awful than new Galactica needs to go back in time and flip through the 8 available channels. You had 8 channels? You lucky bastard! Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Sir T on July 01, 2010, 05:32:08 AM At that time I had 2. Your point?
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: tgr on July 01, 2010, 08:05:21 AM At that time I had 2. Your point? And you had to walk uphill, in the rain, both ways, just to watch them? :grin:Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Bzalthek on July 01, 2010, 09:21:46 AM I didn't like Old Galactica. I liked the memories of anticipating new-awesome as I was a child. It is no longer new-awesome, but Old Galactica is still associated with new-awesome in my mind because I have never bothered going back and abusing those memories with reality.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Jherad on July 01, 2010, 11:55:11 AM I loved the old Battlestar Galactica - the height of sophistication compared to some of the alternatives:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/10/B7_Cast_A.jpg) Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: HaemishM on July 01, 2010, 12:13:26 PM You shut your dirty whore mouth.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 01, 2010, 12:39:38 PM And some of you think i'm the crazy one.
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Sir T on July 02, 2010, 07:07:36 AM Avon calling!
Title: Re: Battlestar Galactica Online Post by: Soln on July 02, 2010, 05:17:04 PM best SF character ever. Lawful Evil FTW.
|