f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Serious Business => Topic started by: taolurker on March 09, 2010, 09:43:37 AM



Title: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: taolurker on March 09, 2010, 09:43:37 AM
Lindsay Lohan wants to sue E trade over commercial with Milkaholic?

Is this real? (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/entertainment/post/2010/03/lindsay-lohan-sues-e-trade-over-ad-baby/1)

According to the New York post? (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/lohan_such_baby_jVdQWABj9z0MgXzCv1Nh1O)




really?

 :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: 01101010 on March 09, 2010, 09:48:16 AM
Ummm... well, when you piss all over your acting career and melt from hotty to ugh, you gotta find some way to pay the bills and rehab. (and in saying that, I am reaching so far off that I will have to climb back on the couch after falling)

Oh and I liked that e-trade commercial, but not as much as the shank-a-potomus one (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRPRVTQl6Sc).

edit: for the link


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Cyrrex on March 09, 2010, 10:31:22 AM
So, to keep this topic even remotely interesting, let's talk about the e-trade commercials in general.  The shank--a-potomus one was brilliant, but I think it is also the last of the good ones.  The new ones absolutely suck.  They have changed them on some fundamental level that I cannot put my finger on.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Rasix on March 09, 2010, 10:33:10 AM
They have changed them on some fundamental level that I cannot put my finger on.

New or older baby in the commercials. Not as cute.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Cyrrex on March 09, 2010, 10:35:35 AM
They have changed them on some fundamental level that I cannot put my finger on.

New or older baby in the commercials. Not as cute.

Yes, that's part of it.  But it's more than that.  Like the suits have taken over and ruined a good thing.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Musashi on March 09, 2010, 10:46:43 AM
They're claiming that 'Lindsay' is a single name as recognizable as 'Oprah.'  Seems like this is more intended to make that the case, than prove it already was. 


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Nebu on March 09, 2010, 10:58:53 AM
Lindsay, like most of Hollywood, has more money than sense. 

Hey!  I pretend to be other people for a living.  Please take me seriously!  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Dren on March 09, 2010, 12:54:19 PM
They have changed them on some fundamental level that I cannot put my finger on.

New or older baby in the commercials. Not as cute.

Yes, that's part of it.  But it's more than that.  Like the suits have taken over and ruined a good thing.

For me, the baby used to be imitating that "one guy" you all know that is probably high up in sales at some company and seems to have the "know how" on all-things-making-money.  He plays hard and works hard.

Lately, they are having multiple babies do weird singing skits and related activities.  They just don't jive with anything I'm familiar with or can relate to...  Barber shop quartet?  Huh?


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Ingmar on March 09, 2010, 01:39:43 PM
Wait, wait. People found those commercials anything other than creepy/annoying?


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Signe on March 09, 2010, 01:41:48 PM
Wait, wait. People found those commercials anything other than creepy/annoying?

I completely agree.  I think these are among the creepiest adverts I've ever seen. 


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Nebu on March 09, 2010, 02:11:45 PM
I love the E-Trade commercials.  Especially the one where he calls the guy in the background "Shank-o-potomus"


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Malakili on March 09, 2010, 02:46:17 PM
The only one I've really liked was the one where the baby starts to sing and the other one tells him its "not the venue."

Also, I imagine this is just a publicity stunt, I doubt people were associating this commercial with Lindsay Lohan...but anyone who has read/seen this story now will.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Merusk on March 09, 2010, 03:32:04 PM
I've never liked the e-trade baby commercials.  They were always fairly annoying to me on some level I just can't pin down. That is until the milkaholic one.  That one actually got a really good laugh out of me.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: LK on March 09, 2010, 04:02:05 PM
What a cunt.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Sky on March 10, 2010, 06:32:31 AM
The only one I've really liked was the one where the baby starts to sing and the other one tells him its "not the venue."
Take...these broken wings...

They're ok commercials, usually get a chuckle out of me the first couple times.

Now every time I hear Lindsey Lohan's name I'll think Milkaholic. Nice going, Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 10, 2010, 11:55:51 AM
I had to turn away from the puke one.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Ozzu on March 10, 2010, 05:19:03 PM
...and learn to flyyyy again...
 
:grin:


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Cyrrex on March 11, 2010, 05:32:17 AM
Thanks, been looking for a new avatar.


Title: Re: Lindsay Lohan sues E trade?
Post by: Righ on March 11, 2010, 09:22:36 AM
Talking baby ads got old the very first time they were ever used (Herod's tax raising commercials in ancient Judea, I believe).