|
Title: Ouch. Post by: SurfD on January 24, 2010, 10:17:51 PM Someone in the local channel i was just in was passing around the following Killboard link
http://ragefororder.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7044 Man, that has got to hurt. Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: IainC on January 25, 2010, 01:19:30 AM What the hell is a Cyclops?
Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: schild on January 25, 2010, 01:35:44 AM Total ISK Loss: 62,449,386,877.00
Total Module drop? 50B lol Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Phildo on January 25, 2010, 01:44:13 AM Cyclops is a fighterbomber. The new hotness for supercarriers.
Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Amarr HM on January 25, 2010, 05:24:20 AM Those figures look slightly wrong. Chelms cap recharger is not worth 8b only about 2b, Titan BPs are about 20b though so it's more like a 30b drop and 20b destruction. Still though nice gank.
Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: palmer_eldritch on January 25, 2010, 11:05:54 AM That's the guy who trolled Goonswarm into thinking he was taking his corp out of Sys-K recently. His corp seems to have left Sys-k :)
It's an amazing gank if it's real. Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Phildo on February 07, 2010, 03:27:07 PM Thread name is appropriate:
http://rooksandkings.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=6454 Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Endie on February 07, 2010, 04:26:16 PM I am never quite sure about stacked BPs, but I suspect that the ISK figure is inflated by multiple BPCs being valued as BPOs.
Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Amarr HM on February 07, 2010, 07:15:10 PM That's an amazing gank.
I am never quite sure about stacked BPs, but I suspect that the ISK figure is inflated by multiple BPCs being valued as BPOs. Afaik stacked BPs means BPO in every case, cause you can't stack a copy. Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Nope on February 08, 2010, 05:41:08 AM That's an amazing gank. I am never quite sure about stacked BPs, but I suspect that the ISK figure is inflated by multiple BPCs being valued as BPOs. Afaik stacked BPs means BPO in every case, cause you can't stack a copy. I am up for testing this with some ammo blueprints now that I am back in empire. Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Amarr HM on February 08, 2010, 05:50:22 AM Once they are researched they are considered used and therefore unstackable.
Title: Re: Ouch. Post by: Pax on February 08, 2010, 06:18:56 AM Once they are researched they are considered used and therefore unstackable. To expand on this, it is enough to copy a BPO or manufacture something from a BPO (even unresearched one) to make it used and therefore unstackable. |