f13.net

f13.net General Forums => TV => Topic started by: Evildrider on May 24, 2009, 10:04:34 AM



Title: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on May 24, 2009, 10:04:34 AM
Ok, so I watched it.. and I liked it.   :ye_gods:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on May 24, 2009, 02:16:49 PM
Inspired casting, great music, not sure how they'll be able to sustain it for a full season, though.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on May 24, 2009, 08:07:30 PM
Inspired casting, great music, not sure how they'll be able to sustain it for a full season, though.


That was my thought too. 

The casting is perfect so far, but I wonder how big they are gonna grow the Glee club as the show progresses.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: HaemishM on May 26, 2009, 07:44:54 AM
When did you become a woman?  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Jeff Kelly on May 26, 2009, 09:01:36 AM
The cast is too uneven as far as singing and dancing is concerned if they want to continue that. The Journey piece was definitively great but the guy completely sunk compared to the girl.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tebonas on May 26, 2009, 09:08:20 AM
So whats it about? Vampire Hunters, Robots from the future, or snarky professionals?

Give me something. Right now it sounds like High School Musical, the series.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: HaemishM on May 26, 2009, 09:23:38 AM
Give me something. Right now it sounds like High School Musical, the series.

I think you have it surrounded.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: schild on May 26, 2009, 12:37:41 PM
I walked in when my roommate was watching the end. All I could think was "This was better on Family Guy."

I can't believe Terminator died so that shit like this could exist.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on May 26, 2009, 04:12:52 PM
The cast is too uneven as far as singing and dancing is concerned if they want to continue that. The Journey piece was definitively great but the guy completely sunk compared to the girl.
Yes he's the only one of them that's not a seasoned performer in real life and it shows. However it does fit his character's background. He's just a jock that likes singing to himself in the shower. The girl on the other hand has been doing this since she was a toddler (on the show).


Give me something. Right now it sounds like High School Musical, the series.
The blurb from the FOX site:

Quote
From Ryan Murphy, the creator of "Nip/Tuck" and "Popular," comes GLEE, a one-hour musical comedy that follows an optimistic high school teacher as he tries to transform the Glee Club and inspire a group of ragtag performers to make it to the biggest competition of all: Nationals.

Will Schuester, a young optimistic teacher, has offered to take on the Herculean task of restoring McKinley's Glee Club to its former glory. Everyone around him thinks he's nuts. He's out to prove them all wrong.


I walked in when my roommate was watching the end. All I could think was "This was better on Family Guy."

I can't believe Terminator died so that shit like this could exist.
You are better off blaming Whedon :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on May 26, 2009, 05:10:00 PM
BTW the Pilot episode is still available on Hulu:

http://www.hulu.com/watch/73740/glee-pilot


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: schild on May 27, 2009, 12:17:27 AM
BTW the Pilot episode is still available on Hulu:

http://www.hulu.com/watch/73740/glee-pilot
oh thank god i was worried i'd have to catch a rerun


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Paelos on May 27, 2009, 09:56:04 AM
I made it 5 minutes. I stopped caring.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on May 27, 2009, 09:59:42 AM
I didn't expect to like it at all, but I thought it was entertaining.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: stu on May 30, 2009, 01:38:43 PM
So... there's only the one episode until the fall season begins?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on May 30, 2009, 02:30:18 PM
Yep, it's part of the marketing for the show.  Seems to have been a good choice, it's getting alot of "buzz".


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tebonas on June 02, 2009, 12:06:40 PM
So, I was bored with the lack of new TV series for my rowing workout and I actually thought better than nothing.

That actually worked for me, I think the understated humor did it. "We never found out who my real dad is"


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: LanTheWarder on June 16, 2009, 09:05:41 AM
Couldn't make it through the whole episode it just didn't do anything for me.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: bhodi on September 12, 2009, 07:03:21 AM
Even a gay friend of mine said this show was too gay for him.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on September 12, 2009, 02:40:11 PM
Ookii denned my repeat thread, but I like it for its likeness to Election. I lolled at the first and second episodes. It doesn't try too hard, which is a nice change.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: schild on September 12, 2009, 03:05:00 PM
Ookii can't den a thread, I did.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tannhauser on September 12, 2009, 03:21:00 PM
It's a fun show, the main girl is adorable.  But I don't know how they can sustain it either.  The female coach is amusing too.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Rasix on September 17, 2009, 10:35:21 AM
Last episode had some really lazy writing.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: 01101010 on September 17, 2009, 11:13:52 AM
Last episode had some really lazy writing.

Indeed. The OCD teacher girl is sadly the most dynamic of the crew. Every single person on that show is built so one-dimensional it almost pains me to watch. I give it one more episode before I go on my merry way.

--and can someone please explain to me why the cheerleaders wear their uniforms EVERY SINGLE DAY? I get the underlying purpose, but is it really THAT necessary?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on September 17, 2009, 12:04:30 PM
I can't think of any reason why you'd complain about those uniforms. Maybe they have a low costume budget.

Yeah, last night's episode wasn't that great, but I'm hoping it was just a lull.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Ookii on September 17, 2009, 11:04:33 PM
I'm trying to figure out if it's worse that I watch this or Ugly Betty.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Signe on September 18, 2009, 06:50:55 AM
I think it's awesome that you watch those shows.  You're in touch with whatever side it is that covers that sort of thing.  You should be proud of it!



(http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/images/smilies/dog.gif)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Paelos on September 18, 2009, 11:42:22 PM
The show is horrid in the 30s promos they put on TV and the radio. I can't imagine sitting through a full episode for an hour.

But then again they gave it more of a chance than anything with a remote Sci-Fi fanbase, so it's got legs.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Chimpy on September 19, 2009, 08:20:48 AM
It is a campy musical melodrama.

That formula has worked for getting eyeballs into seats in this country for 125 years.

You don't have to think, you get to laugh, and you see pretty girls singing and dancing around. Very much in the formula that has been selling out musical comedies since the late 1800s.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Signe on September 19, 2009, 10:43:58 AM
It is a campy musical melodrama.

That formula has worked for getting eyeballs into seats in this country for 125 years.

You don't have to think, you get to laugh, and you see pretty girls singing and dancing around. Very much in the formula that has been selling out musical comedies since the late 1800s.

That you, Grandpa Shirley?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Chimpy on September 19, 2009, 12:39:26 PM
Sorry, 7 semesters of theatre history classes in college/grad school. One of which was entirely devoted to the crap that was considered American Theatre in the 18th and 19th centuries.



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tannhauser on September 19, 2009, 07:03:08 PM
Ok 3rd episode was boring.  Falling off my radar.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on September 19, 2009, 10:56:06 PM
I can see this surviving for a while despite itself just based on what it's up against. The alternatives are SVU, The new Ed O'Neil show followed by "Cougar Town" , and Criminal Minds.  Seems like it'll capture a nice niche and live on.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: 01101010 on September 20, 2009, 06:02:41 AM
I may survive the season up against those other shows sure, but I can see it getting moved to Friday nights next season (which is the death knell for most shows on the alphabet stations).


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Gobbeldygook on October 01, 2009, 05:21:31 AM
I can completely see Kristin Chenoweth getting an emmy nod for best guest star for this episode.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on October 01, 2009, 11:08:39 AM
I thought last night's episode was excellent as well. Even the musical numbers were entertaining (instead of something I just tolerate).


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Ragnoros on November 11, 2009, 09:01:29 PM
Just happened to walk into the living room as my sisters were watching this. I never walked out. Quite enjoyable.

"I wanna be very clear, I still have the use of my penis."  :drill:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on November 14, 2009, 08:58:28 AM
Whatsername's stutter has always bothered me as sounding really fake.  I'm glad to learn it was in-character bad acting rather than real-world bad acting.

Also, they need to stop humanizing Sue.  It confuses me.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on November 14, 2009, 10:27:44 AM
Whatsername's stutter has always bothered me as sounding really fake.  I'm glad to learn it was in-character bad acting rather than real-world bad acting.

Also, they need to stop humanizing Sue.  It confuses me.


Seriously, it's hard to hate her when she does nice things!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on December 10, 2009, 11:24:50 AM
The season finale was  :drill:.  I'm glad they had the balls to resolve the major plot points rather than stretching the same shit out for another season.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on December 10, 2009, 11:53:56 AM
Not season finale -- it was the Fall finale.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on December 10, 2009, 12:06:41 PM
Leaving aside that Fall is a season -- when do we get new episodes?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on December 10, 2009, 01:56:26 PM
For new episodes it's going to be after AI (or near the end of it).



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on December 10, 2009, 01:58:09 PM
I can't tell you how proud I am that it took me a minute to figure out what "AI" is.   :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Rasix on December 10, 2009, 02:26:27 PM
I can't tell you how proud I am that it took me a minute to figure out what "AI" is.   :awesome_for_real:

Took me a while too.  Nadir of my TV season.   Nothing like being bombarded about the next mediocre singer that I'll never hear about again.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on December 10, 2009, 02:27:46 PM
Carrie Underwood just had a Christmas special on FOX. :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on December 10, 2009, 04:52:17 PM
Who?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on December 10, 2009, 04:58:58 PM
She dated Tony Romo before Jessica Simpson did.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on December 10, 2009, 05:04:02 PM
Who?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on December 12, 2009, 12:19:15 PM
"Sex isn't dating, if it was, Santana and I would be dating."

Hawt.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: NowhereMan on January 23, 2010, 05:07:09 PM
Ok randomly watched this because I was bored and seem to have run out of trash to entertain me. It was fun. If I was going to start thinking for even a second I'd complain that they had a horrible schizophrenia in writing characters, back to back they went from nice and balanced one episode to psycho bitch the next. It does the fill the need of fun, mindless entertainment with some really good moments and overall enjoyable music. Ridiculous enough to pull it off much of the plot without making me gag.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on February 26, 2010, 09:06:15 AM
This is making it's way over to the UK and I have to say I'm enjoying it. It's pretty mindless, but I like it.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on February 26, 2010, 05:37:54 PM
This is making it's way over to the UK and I have to say I'm enjoying it. It's pretty mindless, but I like it.

It's a fun show, the ppl that think it's "OMG! HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL" are missing out I think.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: NowhereMan on February 28, 2010, 04:15:46 PM
Honestly from what I've seen of it, it's more like Desperate Housewives with music and teenagers.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on April 14, 2010, 11:40:42 AM
Did you know that dolphins are just gay sharks?




Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on May 28, 2010, 08:20:43 AM
Is anyone still watching this? The second season got off to a sluggish start but has been picking up. The Madonna episode was probably the best episode they have done so far.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on May 28, 2010, 09:44:43 AM
Still watching.  I liked that in the last episode they actually did an original arrangement for a song.  And in the same scene hung a nice lampshade on the fact that the pianist is always improbably lurking in the background.

I was really annoyed by the obvious lip syncing (or maybe it was just really heavy autotune usage) in the "Bad Romance" cover, though.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tebonas on May 28, 2010, 09:56:30 AM
Still watching it, still liking it. Except that Kurt/Finn fiasco.

Kurt is clearly a crazy manipulative stalker. Letting Finn use a curse word he never used before just so that Kurts fathers rant seems justified is such a transparent viewer manipulation that it was extremely off-putting.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on May 28, 2010, 10:03:32 AM
I was really annoyed by the obvious lip syncing (or maybe it was just really heavy autotune usage) in the "Bad Romance" cover, though.
It's lip syncing. They rerecord the songs in the studio after (or maybe even before) filming the scene(s).


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Rasix on May 28, 2010, 10:53:39 AM
The "faggy" scene was a bit uncomfortable, but really well written/acted.  You'd expect that sort of reaction out of teenagers, and you'll see that sort of reaction for a long time to come. 

But really, what did Kurt expect?  His motives are completely transparent.  It'd be just as bad if you were in close quarters with a girl you didn't like sans the added homophobia angle.

Not a big fan of Gaga/Kiss so the music wasn't particularly strong for me this episode, but they were a little less clumsy when dealing with the issues unlike a few of the previous episodes.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on May 30, 2010, 04:01:28 PM
The Kurt/Finn thing is awkward, but I agree that the acting was generally pretty convincing. Both characters are fairly sympathetic, which helps. I'm glad they're managing to spin up some new and interesting plot lines, since so many shows seem to fall down a plot black hole in their second season. The main plot line which seems to have gone dead for no particular reason is the Will-Emma one though.

The quip about the pianist was a brilliant little touch.

Santana makes the best Gaga by a long way, although all of their costumes were pretty awesome


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on June 01, 2010, 02:15:47 PM
Still loving it! I was a little sad to see how quickly they tied up the "Shelby is Rachel's mom" arc, but they still have plenty of stories to work with. Can't wait for tonight's episode!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on June 04, 2010, 10:24:26 AM
Finn is 16 all of a sudden?  :headscratch:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Reg on June 04, 2010, 10:40:09 AM
Stars of high school based shows always start off 16 in the first year don't they?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on June 04, 2010, 10:41:33 AM
Stars of high school based shows always start off 16 in the first year don't they?

I don't think they are supposed to be all Freshman.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on June 04, 2010, 10:45:32 AM
Wasn't he about to 'go off to college' in the previous season, when he still thought Quinn's kid was his?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on June 04, 2010, 12:25:36 PM
Wasn't he about to 'go off to college' in the previous season, when he still thought Quinn's kid was his?

I think he's a junior.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: March on June 08, 2010, 07:12:07 PM
"I'm not going to shake your hand, Will; I've seen the car you drive and I don't want to catch Poor."

"What kind of world would that be? A world where I couldn't make fun of you for tearing up more than Michael Landon in a sweeps week episode of Little House on the Prairie"

It took them all year, but I think they finally got the Sue calibration instruments to work.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on June 09, 2010, 12:03:34 AM
I was meh on most of the songs, and in general I think the music was stronger in the early episodes than it's been in the recent ones, but when they started doing To Sir With Love... well, I may have been a little verklempt.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on June 09, 2010, 02:40:47 AM
I liked the songs in the first thirdish of the season better as well but I was totally stoked when I found out the finale would be a Journey episode :awesome_for_real: and it didn't disappoint.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on June 10, 2010, 11:53:29 AM
Man, it just now occurred to me that Sue did a really nice thing by letting Will think that she was the reason they lost.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tannhauser on June 10, 2010, 03:28:10 PM
Oh wow, that's true. :)

Journey songs were great also. 


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on June 10, 2010, 05:31:57 PM
Goddamn my wife and child for watching this while I'm in the same room, I started to pick it up after the Madonna episode.  Yes I like Madonna, fuck you.

Man, it just now occurred to me that Sue did a really nice thing by letting Will think that she was the reason they lost.

I thought the same thing about it being 'nice' and that the whole end was too much of a 180 for the Sue-Will relationship.   The Sue I'd been seeing for the last half a season would have laughed in his face, smirked and walked away letting the club fail.  This turnaround felt forced, even if the 'real stars' were all mean and nasty to her enough to have made her empathize with the outsiders.  She'd shaken off enough personal attacks and real hits to her ego over the year that giving in on that one and being the 'hero' seemed forced.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on June 10, 2010, 09:31:49 PM
Sue suddenly being nice didn't bother me quite as much as Mercedes and Kurt suddenly being happy to play second fiddle to Rachael and Finn.  There were entire episodes in the first half of the season that centered around them fighting to not be the token girly dude and the token black chick.  Then they get to regionals and it's the Rachael and Finn Show again with not a complaint from either of them.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on June 10, 2010, 09:40:47 PM
Well that was kind of the point. Mercedes and Kurt tried to get out of the shadow of Rachel (Kurt wasn't competing for the male lead parts) including joining the Cheerios at one point but it didn't work out so they came back and accepted their backup roles, at least for now. Jesse was Finn's competition for male lead part and in fact took that role from Finn while Jesse was in New Directions but when he went back to Vocal Adrenaline, Finn got his part back.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on June 11, 2010, 07:29:07 AM
Kurt and Mercedes were still in the cheerios. In the episode before regionals, they won the big cheer competition because Kurt did like a 10-minute solo.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on June 11, 2010, 09:42:29 AM
It was 14 minutes. Of Celine Dion. In French. And that's true Kurt is still in the Cheerios. It was only Mercedes that left the Cheerios after her fling with Puck.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on June 11, 2010, 01:35:46 PM
I was bummed that the funk they brought in the previous episode ended up amounting to diddly squat for intimidation against Vocal Adrenaline.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on June 11, 2010, 01:45:45 PM
Almost nothing they do ever amounts to diddly squat in the greater "arc".  They spend the whole season practicing songs and making costumes and coming up with fancy choreography that they're going to use to win at the competition, and then come competition time they don't use any of it (except Don't Stop Believing).  Which I guess is so we don't get bored seeing the same songs over and over again -- but I think it'd actually be pretty cool if they'd done a bunch of songs over the course of the season and then picked the three best to do again but more awesome for the season finale.  But then, I'm a freak in that I like the "rough" and unaccompanied numbers better than the high production value ones in general.

Also, "To Sir With Love" was a better performance than anything they did at regionals IMO.  If nothing else, it was a much better ensemble piece (despite being originally written for one voice).


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on June 14, 2010, 03:35:36 AM
Finale was, ok. It felt like they tried to cram two or three episodes worth of story into a single episode though



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on June 17, 2010, 12:54:27 PM
I saw a coworker watching this, so I was like hm, what's all the fuss about. I found the finale performance online and was all "OMG OMG THIS IS SO MUCH AWESOME" So now I'm watching the series, starting with Ep 2 because the pilot isn't online anywhere.

I must say, it's pretty cool going into it, after knowing where it's headed. I saw the sheet music for Journey and was all, "Mmm hmm," nod knowingly.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Ratman_tf on June 18, 2010, 08:22:14 PM
And through second hand exposure, this show is giving me diabeetus.



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on June 18, 2010, 10:28:13 PM
Omg omg things are happening, and stuff!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on June 22, 2010, 03:31:41 PM
I saw a coworker watching this, so I was like hm, what's all the fuss about. I found the finale performance online and was all "OMG OMG THIS IS SO MUCH AWESOME" So now I'm watching the series, starting with Ep 2 because the pilot isn't online anywhere.

I must say, it's pretty cool going into it, after knowing where it's headed. I saw the sheet music for Journey and was all, "Mmm hmm," nod knowingly.

I watched the pilot on Hulu when the show first aired, but it's not there anymore.  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on June 22, 2010, 03:57:28 PM
I just went out at got the damn DVD. Those video diaries are freakin' cute. I was glad to see them eating big ass pizzas. I'm tired of watching actors starve themselves!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on June 22, 2010, 04:57:26 PM
Library!

Then again, it's probably only in our library whenever my wife wants to pick it up because it's a singing and dancing show and I live in redneck country.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on September 21, 2010, 09:12:23 PM
Speaking of actors starving themselves, I saw pictures of Lea lately and she needs a freakin' sammich. I was afraid that shit was gonna happen.  :uhrr:

HOLY CRAP NEW SEASON!


Spoilered just in case, though I imagine anyone who's gonna see it has already.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on September 22, 2010, 10:27:34 AM
Speaking of actors starving themselves, I saw pictures of Lea lately and she needs a freakin' sammich. I was afraid that shit was gonna happen.  :uhrr:


She is totally skinny, it's true. But her bangs are really cute.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on September 22, 2010, 10:30:11 AM
Also, I thought it was kinda funny that they addressed the "Will sucks at rap" by having Artie rap in what, every song? They just need less rapping. Period.

Also, meow! at the new kid Sam (Gus Van Sant's wet dream).  :drillf:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on September 22, 2010, 10:38:48 AM
Heh. I bet he's all gay and stuff.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on September 22, 2010, 03:34:52 PM
Ugh. I wish Mike Chang would have just stood there and sung whem Sam was auditioning. He's like this really creepy mime now, dancing around while everybody else sings. I suppose it can be attributed to how he loves dance and never gets the chance to do it outside that room. But still, holy crap! Even Brittany stands still once in a while!

Brittany was cute running off with her new sexual harrasment doll. Hehehehe.  :heart:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on September 22, 2010, 03:56:57 PM
Ugh. I wish Mike Chang would have just stood there and sung whem Sam was auditioning. He's like this really creepy mime now, dancing around while everybody else sings.

Yes.  I think the problem is that they haven't figured out what his character is beyond "Asian guy who likes to dance around a lot".


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on September 24, 2010, 03:29:15 PM
I watched it again last night, and when Quinn and Santana were fighting, I got chills when Brittany said, so quietly, "Stop the violence." At first I thought it was funny, but then realized it just might be a sign of a horrible history of abuse, of which Brittany has only been able to survive by pretending to be so dumb....


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on September 25, 2010, 08:31:19 AM
Agreed with most of the points; the plot seemed a little over-worked, but I'm still look forward to a season which I hope will remain mostly lighthearted.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on September 29, 2010, 01:22:32 PM
BRITNEY SPEARS SEX RIOT.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on September 29, 2010, 10:43:05 PM
I watched it again last night, and when Quinn and Santana were fighting, I got chills when Brittany said, so quietly, "Stop the violence." At first I thought it was funny, but then realized it just might be a sign of a horrible history of abuse, of which Brittany has only been able to survive by pretending to be so dumb....

Nah, Brittany is just that dumb.

And more talented than all of them. Bitch.

Seriously, after the Britney Spears episode, if there was any doubt in my mind that Brittany and Santana are what made me watch the show, that doubt is gone.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on September 30, 2010, 07:12:52 AM
Seriously, after the Britney Spears episode, if there was any doubt in my mind that Brittany and Santana are what made me watch the show, that doubt is gone.

Yeah.  And Britney S Pears is hotter than I thought.  Holy shiet.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on September 30, 2010, 07:16:03 AM
For some reason she just looks a hundred times hotter with hair framing her face. Which is odd, since I think the other two cheerios look better with the ponytail look.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on September 30, 2010, 10:32:27 AM
Man, that hair made her sodamnhot in Artie's dream sequence last year, despite being dressed kinda frumpy at the time.

Holy crap. Even in an episode where she had almost half the screentime as everyone else, she still managed to keep it subtle. (Except when she was shoving her body right up in the camera.  :grin: )


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on October 01, 2010, 01:00:54 PM
Unfortunately for Rachel she falls below the Vicky Mendoza diagonal

Fortunately, Santana and Brittany are just stupidly hot.

Will is being a bit too douchey right now, I prefer him as the nice guy.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on October 01, 2010, 01:11:55 PM
For some reason she just looks a hundred times hotter with hair framing her face. Which is odd, since I think the other two cheerios look better with the ponytail look.

Finally watched the episode last night, and I concur 100%.  My theory is that it's her nose.  Big hair has a way of making otherwise prominent facial features look more in balance with the rest of the face.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: sigil on October 05, 2010, 07:46:03 PM
Agreed with most of the points; the plot seemed a little over-worked, but I'm still look forward to a season which I hope will remain mostly lighthearted.

Tonights episode hit waay too close to personal experience.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 05, 2010, 10:15:14 PM
I was surprised that

NOT what I was expecting at all. Freaking amazing. And on top of that, they still brought the funny.

Also the guy who plays Finn is getting better. They'll always face the auto-tuner; shit, they got like a day to learn the songs sometimes. But he put some serious mojo into it nonetheless.

Also,


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on October 06, 2010, 08:32:57 AM
I liked the episode, thought it did a decent enough job of expressing both sides of the issue.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on October 06, 2010, 08:43:00 AM
I wonder if they had to pay the people who made Across the Universe anything to use their version of that song.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on October 06, 2010, 02:28:59 PM
Love that arrangement - my favorite song in that movie. Some of the other songs in this episode, well, PVRs were made for fast forwarding Yentl.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 06, 2010, 02:45:00 PM
I actually liked the Yentl bit. We got to see Rachel not be a complete bitch for a couple minutes.

(Disclaimer: I loves me some showtunes (no homo).)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on October 06, 2010, 02:48:59 PM
BTW, is it me or has Kurt gone from being mostly likable to asshole over the course of the series?  I felt like he really took a plunge in the episode where he schemed and plotted to get Finn sleeping in his room, and during this episode he was just pretty much a dick to everyone (including his dad at the beginning of the episode, so he doesn't get to use the "going through a rough time" excuse for that one).


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on October 06, 2010, 04:07:10 PM
I think it comes and goes; it seems like pretty much all the other kids at school treat him like shit because he's gay, and Glee is the only place where he is accepted for who he is. I'm not sure he was ever that sweet, he always seemed to have a bit of an (understandable) edge. Frankly I think he's one of the most convincing characters in the show, he's flawed but not in an overly exaggerated way, unlike Rachel or Santana. I'd agree with you that the only part of him that I didn't find convincing was the whole "get Finn to love me" plot or whatever the fuck that was, that made fuckall sense.

What's getting me is the whole "hey here's two new interesting characters!" oh wait "yoink, they're gone". I don't get wht they're doing there, but some new blood would have been nice I think.

I have to say, I think this episode and the earlier one with Kurt and his Father have been some of the best episodes the show has done.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 06, 2010, 09:02:43 PM
I don't think any of the characters are meant to be that likable. They need to have their asshole sides, or it becomes High School Musical.

I can understand Kurt not wanting others' prayers. I just started injecting myself with Cimzia for my Crohn's, and all of a sudden everybody was all "Hang on, you are in my prayers, get well soon," whatever the fuck. I fucking hate pity, and I especially hate people dumping their Gods on me. I manage to say "Thank you" and just grit my teeth through it, but I'm getting near 40 now. Kurt's just a kid. If he didn't act out occasionally, I wouldn't believe him human at all.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Tebonas on October 08, 2010, 08:11:41 AM
The only real bad thing about Kurts characterization was the Finn stalking fiasko, and only insofar as it was presented by the writers as the ok thing to do.

He is kind of a snippy bitch, but in a believable way for a teenage boy and not in an exaggerated "TV gay" way.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 08, 2010, 11:35:53 AM
Interesting, I didn't get that at all. To me it was more like "Hey kids, this is what to do if you want to alienate your straight friends."


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 13, 2010, 10:01:32 AM
And as if on cue, last night we got a sympathetic look on both sides of that particular coin. I'm not too cool with the way Kurt's dad handled the conversation, but it was believable. I like how they still keep shit real between each other, even though Burt just got out of the hospital. Burt doesn't baby his son, so Kurt sure ain't gonna baby his dad.

Sad. Meatball. :(


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on October 14, 2010, 10:37:54 AM
They were tired of scissoring.   :drillf:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on October 14, 2010, 10:39:29 AM
Sad. Meatball. :(

Agree.  Stupid Artie.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 14, 2010, 11:30:54 AM
They were tired of scissoring.   :drillf:

Hawt! I like it when they actually address their sex life instead of just making it some kind of joke. Not only does it keep the characters honest, but it is also hawt.

WTF IS THAT CREEPY AVATAR SAMWISE  :ye_gods: (also agreed re: stupid Artie.)



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on October 14, 2010, 11:34:49 AM
WTF IS THAT CREEPY AVATAR SAMWISE  :ye_gods:

You asked for it. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lqfQi7146U)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 14, 2010, 01:35:39 PM
WTF IS THAT CREEPY AVATAR SAMWISE  :ye_gods:

You asked for it. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lqfQi7146U)

Nooooooooooooooo /vader  :uhrr:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on October 14, 2010, 02:30:23 PM
WTF IS THAT CREEPY AVATAR SAMWISE  :ye_gods:

You asked for it. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lqfQi7146U)

NSFW but much better vid! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQp5l4-sfFA)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on October 16, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
I really liked the duets; Tina and Mike were a lot of fun, Kurt was great and Mercedes and Santana were also really good. It was a bit too obvious for comfort that Quinn was lip-synching in hers, but it was forgivable.

What was the deal with Rachel and Finn's duet; I understand that it pissed all the others off, but I don't know the song, nor the context. Also frankly I think they missed a trick by not doing Springtime for Hitler  :why_so_serious:

Sad. Meatball. :(

Agree.  Stupid Artie.

And as if on cue, last night we got a sympathetic look on both sides of that particular coin. I'm not too cool with the way Kurt's dad handled the conversation, but it was believable. I like how they still keep shit real between each other, even though Burt just got out of the hospital. Burt doesn't baby his son, so Kurt sure ain't gonna baby his dad.

I thought he handled it fairly well to be honest, but otherwise I agree with you. Overall I like this episode, the series is starting to grow some legs, and I'm pleased with how they're handling the chanracters. I'm still curious about the other Asian girl, and wtf is up with Puck.

edit: Also

"The Clintons?"  :awesome_for_real:

Every week a winner.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 17, 2010, 01:01:13 AM
Quote
What was the deal with Rachel and Finn's duet; I understand that it pissed all the others off, but I don't know the song, nor the context. Also frankly I think they missed a trick by not doing Springtime for Hitler  :why_so_serious:

A lot of people missed that, myself included. Apparently she was supposed to be a Catholic school girl, and the song was about having sex or something. Everybody I know thought she was dressed as a nun, and didn't understand the song. Even so, given the World of Glee, it was small potatoes compared to the Britney Spears Sex Riot, marijuana brownies, and kicking old ladies down stairs.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Samwise on October 26, 2010, 08:46:23 PM
Tonight's episode...  :why_so_serious:

Just pure awesome.  Especially the cameo by Brad and Eddie.  And "Toucha Toucha".


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on October 26, 2010, 10:22:43 PM
Heh! Barry Bostwick and Meatloaf. I can't stand Rocky Horror, but they made it awesome. And I love it when Sue is right. And by love it I mean I hate it. But by that I mean I love it.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on October 27, 2010, 08:05:23 AM
Fun episode


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on November 12, 2010, 06:22:11 AM


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on November 12, 2010, 06:38:49 AM
That was better Katy Perry than Katy Perry.

Seriously, I'd love to see her naked, but if she never sang again, I'd be ok with it.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 12, 2010, 10:34:27 AM

I called the meatheads being closet Muscle Marys like, two episodes into season 1.  :drillf:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on November 12, 2010, 12:08:00 PM
To me, Glee seems to be getting more and more serious and a bit over the time with "sending a message" with each episode.  I'd like to get back to lighthearted fun and jokes that you're not sure should be on a primetime network show.



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on November 12, 2010, 12:14:19 PM

I called the meatheads being closet Muscle Marys like, two episodes into season 1.  :drillf:

Well yeah, it was kinda obvious at least one of 'em would be.

I'm still kinda hoping Kurt and *cough* Blaine (really? that was the best they could come up with for a private school kid?) hook up, just so he can stop being a whiny little bitch.

Also, Artie and Puck as a team is badass.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 12, 2010, 02:14:29 PM
Just caught it last night. That was seriously the most gay and the least gay episode they've done yet. At the same time! Amazing. I can just see them going "Dude, an entire boy's school singing to Kurt? Too gay! We need Lea Michele in tight leather STAT!"

I liked how the white gay bully (tried to google the character's name but the Internet is currently awash with tons of articles going "OMG GLEE DO NOT UNDERSTAND GAYS" for some stupid fucking reason) is still a bully and didn't get transformed overnight into an understanding nice guy. I don't know who Kurt will end up with now! Who can say! Hmmmm! Heh, the producers have said several times that Kurt will hook up with a member of the football team, or a new kid, or a rival kid, or even someone from Vocal Adrenaline.

And I'm kinda missing Rachel and/or Finn episodes. It's been nice focusing on the others for a while, but eh.

Oh and btw, it may be interesting to note the actor playing White-gay-bully is actually a decent singer, and was even in a Glee club back in high school. WILL HE JOIN GLEE???


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 12, 2010, 03:12:23 PM
Here's the "omg glee is bad gay advice" thing I mentioned earlier:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leah-anthony-libresco/glees-gay-suicide-psa-it_b_781815.html

The writer of that article seems to think that everybody involved in the bullying handled it poorly. Given the outcome of the episode, I think that was the point.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 12, 2010, 03:52:38 PM

I liked how the white gay bully (tried to google the character's name but the Internet is currently awash with tons of articles going "OMG GLEE DO NOT UNDERSTAND GAYS" for some stupid fucking reason) is still a bully and didn't get transformed overnight into an understanding nice guy. I don't know who Kurt will end up with now! Who can say! Hmmmm! Heh, the producers have said several times that Kurt will hook up with a member of the football team, or a new kid, or a rival kid, or even someone from Vocal Adrenaline.



The gay bully sexually assaulted Kurt. I hope Kurt doesn't go all Stockholm Syndrome on that shit, but I also don't want to watch the downer of Glee exploring sexual assault-as-episode fodder.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 12, 2010, 03:59:30 PM
Yeah that kinda creeped me out. I was spoiled on the bully's gayness before I saw the episode, so I went past that "OMG" moment and went straight to the "Ewww."

Hopefully they'll make light of it. Strange thing to hope for, but they've made it work before. (q.v. the original Glee teacher in episode 1)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on November 12, 2010, 04:29:35 PM
Here's the "omg glee is bad gay advice" thing I mentioned earlier:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leah-anthony-libresco/glees-gay-suicide-psa-it_b_781815.html

The writer of that article seems to think that everybody involved in the bullying handled it poorly. Given the outcome of the episode, I think that was the point.

I personally think the writer of this article lives in lala land. I make no destruction in who is being bullied. But FFS grow some. Does it matter that is a gay person, or a nerd, or some fat girl? Being bullied is being bullied. Confront that shit, you may get an ass whopping. But thinking someone is always going to be there to save in the real world is absolutely ludicrous. I speak from experience, being a "Victim (*sigh*)* of bulling myself.

The gay bully sexually assaulted Kurt.

Sweet mother of god! Really? Wow.... Really? That's really what you want to classify it as? REALLY?

I was cheering the entire time Kurt decided to confront.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 12, 2010, 04:38:41 PM


The gay bully sexually assaulted Kurt.

Sweet mother of god! Really? Wow.... Really? That's really what you want to classify it as? REALLY?

I was cheering the entire time Kurt decided to confront.

Kinda, yeah. If it had been a girl instead of Kurt, with some big dude using physical force to intimidate and restrain her and then planted a weird, intense kiss, what would you call that? I didn't say 'rape', but this was definitely assault.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on November 12, 2010, 04:44:23 PM
More like an act of confused desperation. Even Kurt knew that.

For reference.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEVn8xpyLS4

I see a dude in a moment of frustration go for it, and get rejected. (he goes in for a second time) Blane had it right, "Hes not coming out anytime soon".


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 12, 2010, 04:54:39 PM
Ehhhh....

Okay, he wasn't being malevolent in his intentions, but it was still a pretty fucked-up situation. People commit all kinds of crimes in a moment of desperation or frustration ("passion").


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on November 12, 2010, 04:57:44 PM
I think he was a bit upset that Kurt said "Your not my type".

Are you telling me you have never liked someone, and when they told you something like that, you didn't just go for it? Perhaps in the vain hope of changing there mind, fireworks and all that?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 12, 2010, 07:47:14 PM
Well, first off, I'm a woman, so I've never been at the physical size advantage with anyone that I've put a "move" on. Second, since I'm a woman I've never really had a guy say "no thanks" until much too late.  :oh_i_see:

There's a difference between the lean-in and a full-on head-grab. And it was in the middle of a very violent situation! How can you not see that Kurt was terrified of this jock? The kiss was a surprise, but it doesn't remove the violence from the situation, not one whit.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on November 12, 2010, 08:01:31 PM
Eh, when I watched it, I saw Kurt shocked at the kiss, then completely shocked about being privy to  the secret "jock guy" just exposed, likely a bunch of pity for him. Hence why Kurt got that Blane dude to go talk to him..



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 13, 2010, 10:18:41 AM
Yeah I didn't see "going for it". I just saw outright assault. But I can imagine Kurt forgiving him for it, because it wasn't really horrible assault. Just the kissing version of pushing against the lockers.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Xerapis on November 16, 2010, 06:15:19 PM
Dear Glee,

You know I love you. But if you ever touch Singin in the Rain again, I will cut you.


Love,

X


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 17, 2010, 12:44:25 AM
Yeah I wasn't terribly fond of that either. The episode was downright awesome until that...that...whatever that was.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on November 17, 2010, 06:48:52 AM
That whole episode was... disjointed. Plot points just kind of flying around and inbetween musical moments that just kind of occured. That said, it actually made me enjoy watching Gwyneth Paltrow in something, which I'm not sure has ever happened before. I actually thought the attempt at Singing in the Rain was a much better example of a successfull "mashup" than either of the travesties from the week before.

Hated the All that Jazz number, but I've always hated that song/musical/movie/Liza Minnelli


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 17, 2010, 12:50:01 PM
I don't think that was as much a story-episode, as it was a Gwyneth-episode. Just my impression.

Oh, and holy crap creepy: "There's someone out there for you." Karovsky walks by and winks. Then later on, TEENAGE DEATH THREAT!

Also, "Gay, gay-gay, gaygaygay. Oh look at that, I open up my mouth and a tiny pink purse falls out!"


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 17, 2010, 02:29:32 PM
I hated Gwyneth Paltrow in it. They auto-tuned her all to fuck and it was clearly an attempt at covertly promoting the new movie she's in (does she play Loretta Lynn?). Yick.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on November 17, 2010, 03:21:45 PM
I'm just amazed they managed to make her seem like she has a personality


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on November 18, 2010, 06:20:34 AM
Yea, that's more what I was getting at.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on November 18, 2010, 08:03:33 AM
Lotta of weird, awesome and funny things in this episode.  The thermometer and vasoline and playing sick baby?   :awesome_for_real:

Also, "Gay, gay-gay, gaygaygay. Oh look at that, I open up my mouth and a tiny pink purse falls out!"

I was rolling with this one.  Awesome.

I hated the "All That Jazz" number.  It was terrible and I've seen it done better.

When Shoester? Shuester? was hallucinating and all the Glee people were small kids was funny too.

The Singing in the Rain was pretty bad.  I love the set and the choreography but the song was just awful.  The song they mashed it with fucking drives me insane every time I hear it.

Edit:
I forgot, "There has to be a Journey song we haven't done yet!"


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 18, 2010, 10:42:42 AM
I'm sure I'm in the minority on this one, but I'm really missing Rachel Berry. The first season was generally through her eyes, and it gave the whole arc a sense of focus. Now it's all over the place, she's become even more of a charicature of herself, has one or two lines per episode, and it's all a bunch of stuff that happens to a bunch of different people. It's nobody's story anymore.

The producers have said several times that they want to go more in-depth on all the characters this season, so I have a feeling it's intentional, but it just feels disjointed.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 18, 2010, 11:23:47 AM
No, I agree with you. I miss Rachel, too. I love her insufferable egotism.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on November 18, 2010, 01:43:01 PM
I agree as well.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 19, 2010, 04:43:24 PM
I'm sure her recording was auto-tuned (everybody is, duh), but I don't know about "the fuck out of". She has that jerky tonality with everything she sings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjx5wSXROl0



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 23, 2010, 10:59:39 PM
Okay, Sue fucking rocked. It's awesome to see her do the right thing. I hope she doesn't make a habit of it though.  :grin:

And the "Glee wedding" was good old fashioned Glee cheese. Oh man, been a while since we've had some of that.



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on November 24, 2010, 12:47:36 AM
Okay, Sue fucking rocked. It's awesome to see her do the right thing. I hope she doesn't make a habit of it though.  :grin:
She did something similar, though not quite as impactful, at the end of the religion episode too.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on November 24, 2010, 10:16:48 AM
I loved this episode, too. Straight up misty-eyed cheese-fest.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 24, 2010, 12:17:15 PM
I'm starting to think that to combat the "Rachel-hate" they're making us fall more in love with Kurt, then make him Best Buddies with Rachel. They do a duet together, she offers him a solo, and next week she's quietly cheering him on from the audience....

http://insidetv.ew.com/2010/11/24/glee-darren-criss-train-hey-soul-sister/



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on November 25, 2010, 08:19:00 AM
I fucking loved this ep. Misty-eyed cheese doesn't describe it. It did make me dread the remaining planning I have to do for my own wedding a little less.

And sue's dress was badass. Still trying to talk the missus into something like it.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on November 30, 2010, 11:28:51 PM
Thank you Glee for moar Rachel. Also, love the straight-off-Internet-comments line from Quinn, "Mostly you're just annoying but now I find I want to punch you every time you open your mouth."


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on December 01, 2010, 03:43:13 PM
Also, love the straight-off-Internet-comments line from Quinn, "Mostly you're just annoying but now I find I want to punch you every time you open your mouth."

That is exactly what I thought as well.

I hated seeing Rachel so castrated again, but at least they weren't side-stepping the "let everyone have a turn" issue this time.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on December 02, 2010, 05:56:18 PM
I thought this was one of the best episodes they have done, and it tied up a lot of the slightly more ponderous story arcs too.

Florence + The Machine was an interesting choice.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on December 07, 2010, 09:18:06 PM
Okay so Glee Christmas was amazing. I didn't think they'd take the Grinch as far as they did. Freaking brilliant.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on December 08, 2010, 06:16:53 AM
I didn't have much hope when it started, as I was expecting a non story wrapped around annoying Christmas Choir songs. By the end of it though, I was happy. Three bits made it work for me:

 - Becky the Reindog
 - Brittney in Cindy Lou Who braids
 - and that stupid Whoville song which for some reason allways gets to me this time of year.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on December 08, 2010, 08:03:00 AM
Yes, yes and yes. All three of those things made this ep rock.

Those and the fact that I think Artie and Brittany are the best couple evar.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on December 08, 2010, 08:38:54 AM
Sorry, but my inner letch is still hoping for a Brittney / Santana reuniting. That, and I really find the Artie character annoying.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on December 08, 2010, 09:06:11 AM
Sorry, but my inner letch is still hoping for a Brittney / Santana reuniting. That, and I really find the Artie character annoying.

Not that I disagree about the hotness of Brittany/Santana (oh so hot), but Bartie is just so damn cute.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on December 08, 2010, 12:13:53 PM
Odd lack of Chanukah though, in what has been an otherwise fairly Jew-friendly show so far.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on December 08, 2010, 12:18:15 PM
I thought the "Baby It's Cold Outside" was pretty meh.  Curt's voice is perfect for the female role, but the other dude's voice wasn't right for it, it was too soft imo.

The rest of the ep was great.  I love me some Grinch.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on December 08, 2010, 03:38:16 PM
I didn't have much hope when it started, as I was expecting a non story wrapped around annoying Christmas Choir songs. By the end of it though, I was happy. Three bits made it work for me:

 - Becky the Reindog
 - Brittney in Cindy Lou Who braids
 - and that stupid Whoville song which for some reason allways gets to me this time of year.

Totes.

But does anyone besides Sauced and me think that Becky is basically a pirate's slave-monkey to Sue? Doesn't seem very pro-handicapable to me.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on December 08, 2010, 03:56:43 PM
Odd lack of Chanukah though, in what has been an otherwise fairly Jew-friendly show so far.
The Jewish reference was the Chinese food on Christmas Day quip from Rachel.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on December 08, 2010, 03:57:49 PM
But does anyone besides Sauced and me think that Becky is basically a pirate's slave-monkey to Sue? Doesn't seem very pro-handicapable to me.

Yes, pirate slave monkey, but I get the feeling that they're ignoring the handicapable angle completely. Or, Sue is empowering a Downs kid in a way that she (Becky) wouldn't be empowered otherwise. (By turning her eeeeevil MUAHAHAHAHA. Er, but in a fun way.)

The Jewish reference was the Chinese food on Christmas Day quip from Rachel.

Ah, good catch, I missed that.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on December 09, 2010, 05:23:27 AM
But does anyone besides Sauced and me think that Becky is basically a pirate's slave-monkey to Sue? Doesn't seem very pro-handicapable to me.

Yes and no.  It's a very big sister/ little sister relationship.   If you didn't have siblings you wouldn't quite get it, but if you did think about how the older of you always managed to manipulate the other into being your accomplice.  It's using people being confused for love and very fitting for the emotional child Sue is.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on December 09, 2010, 10:29:09 AM
I have a younger brother, but he never really did my bidding. I didn't try to use him as my personal assistant, though, either.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on December 09, 2010, 10:54:18 AM
Then you missed out on one of the great joys of siblinghood!  As the eldest of 4 I had several minions, and they had their own.  Well until you got to the youngest, but they're the youngest so fuckem!  They get all the attention anyway.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on December 09, 2010, 01:15:01 PM
But does anyone besides Sauced and me think that Becky is basically a pirate's slave-monkey to Sue? Doesn't seem very pro-handicapable to me.
No. Sue heaps abuse on Becky because she treats Becky as if she wasn't handicapped. There was an early episode in Season 1 where Becky was in Cheerio tryouts or something like that and Sue insulted her performance just like she would've to a person without Down's. And Becky, I believe, appreciates that because it makes her feel like she's more like a regular person.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on December 09, 2010, 01:22:23 PM
No. Sue heaps abuse on Becky because she treats Becky as if she wasn't handicapped. There was an early episode in Season 1 where Becky was in Cheerio tryouts or something like that and Sue insulted her performance just like she would've to a person without Down's. And Becky, I believe, appreciates that because it makes her feel like she's more like a regular person.

THOSE BETTER BE TEARS OF JOY!!!

I think that universal bitchiness also came across when she was insulting Kurt, calling him a girl's name, and Kurt accused her of bullying. So she just used a different insult.  :awesome_for_real:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on December 10, 2010, 10:06:08 AM
But does anyone besides Sauced and me think that Becky is basically a pirate's slave-monkey to Sue? Doesn't seem very pro-handicapable to me.
No. Sue heaps abuse on Becky because she treats Becky as if she wasn't handicapped. There was an early episode in Season 1 where Becky was in Cheerio tryouts or something like that and Sue insulted her performance just like she would've to a person without Down's. And Becky, I believe, appreciates that because it makes her feel like she's more like a regular person.

No, I remember all that but she doesn't ever insult Becky like she does everyone else, she just uses her to do her bidding. I mean, it'd be a lot funnier if Sue called Becky "Corky" once in awhile to keep it real, naw mean?  :why_so_serious:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on December 10, 2010, 01:28:43 PM
Given her natural born sister's also has downs, she's never going to heap abuse on her based on that.  Never.   Remember the episode where they introduced her sister and she donated to have wheelchair ramps installed.  She's got a soft spot for disabilities.  That's the main reason I see it as an elder/ younger sibling relationship rather than anything else.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on December 10, 2010, 02:15:05 PM
Yeah, I know all that! I still think it's fucked up that she treats Becky like her little henchman. That's all.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on December 11, 2010, 08:55:05 AM
Yeah, I know all that! I still think it's fucked up that she treats Becky like her little henchman. That's all.

Anyone in the position of henchman would be treated as a henchmen.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on February 18, 2011, 09:04:54 AM
"...consider my offer, not only am i giving visitation rights to the set of rambunctious twins that live on my rib cage, you get the chance to show that pastry face finn that he can’t mess with sam evans."

Love me some Santana.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Ookii on February 18, 2011, 10:18:17 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/IDj6C.gif)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on February 18, 2011, 10:44:04 AM
Santana's had a lot to do this season, and I'm lovin' it. She's so mega-bitchy, just because she can be.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Draegan on February 22, 2011, 06:35:22 AM
I just love Santana.  Don't tell my fiancee.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Ookii on February 22, 2011, 10:45:02 AM
This calls for another gif:

(http://i.imgur.com/H58MO.gif)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on February 23, 2011, 01:18:13 PM
just cause I can...

(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lh1v3tSxSX1qd1agyo1_400.gif)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on February 23, 2011, 02:15:36 PM
I'd do body shots off of Heather Morris anyday!   :drill:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Merusk on February 23, 2011, 02:33:51 PM
Lots of bitching on Facebook over this last one and how inappropriate it was.  Not to mention bitching that "teenagers don't all act like this." 
Erm.

The inappropriate one I can go either way on.  The show is rated PG not PG-13 after all and can push the limits at times.  Still, the important part of that rating is it means, "HEY, discuss this material with your kids!"  Funny that the ones bitching or saying they won't let their 10 year olds/ teens watch this one are the parents who I know get blitzed now and did so in high school.



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on February 23, 2011, 03:21:16 PM
I'm glad there's bitching about it, because it means the show hasn't lost its edge. Every time the story looks like an After School Special, it twists it just enough to keep away from it.

Remember kids, it's ok to be drunk all week long in school, as long as you don't get caught!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on February 26, 2011, 11:40:58 PM
Ke-dollar sign-ha


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on March 09, 2011, 06:45:51 AM
Well, they certainly went a direction I wasn't expecting with this episode.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on March 09, 2011, 07:51:07 AM
I think they stirred a lot of shit up. And a week before Regionals too! Whatever will happen next!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: K9 on March 09, 2011, 08:58:23 AM
The quality of Glee episodes seems to be very variable over this current season; and my enthusiasm to watch the show has ebbed somewhat.

So I watch it in the background while doing chores, laundry and such, and that seems to work.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on March 15, 2011, 09:49:00 PM
OH MAN! Welcome back, Rachel.

Anyone think they're gonna get shit for that uberCatholic Tea Party character?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on March 15, 2011, 10:12:00 PM
I'm sure they are hoping they do.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on March 16, 2011, 10:44:09 AM
Normally I fiercely avoid rightwing blogs, but the proverbial tears shed here tasted great with my morning mocha.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/03/16/kathy-griffin-glee-bashes-sarah-palin-and-christine-odonnell-depicts-

Edit: And here's looking back. The last paragraph made me laugh.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/19/kathy-griffin-glee-guest-star_n_825493.html

I think I'm getting so much catharsis out of this because like most people, I have friends who are hard right, and I had an altercation with one of them yesterday, right before the show. It made me pretty sad. Then last night felt like Ryan Murphy was right there with me.



Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 16, 2011, 11:00:44 AM
Normally I fiercely avoid rightwing blogs, but the proverbial tears shed here tasted great with my morning mocha.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/03/16/kathy-griffin-glee-bashes-sarah-palin-and-christine-odonnell-depicts-

Oh man, that is good.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on March 16, 2011, 01:02:10 PM
I am kinda bummed Sue was just thrown in for comic relief. I was hoping she'd actually be part of the competition. But maybe the episode had enough going on already.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on March 17, 2011, 09:28:04 PM
Normally I fiercely avoid rightwing blogs, but the proverbial tears shed here tasted great with my morning mocha.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/03/16/kathy-griffin-glee-bashes-sarah-palin-and-christine-odonnell-depicts-

Oh man, that is good.

Not to veer too far into politics, but oh god, the comments. Echo chamber circle jerks for the win.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Bunk on March 18, 2011, 07:35:02 AM
The weirdest comments to read in a thread like that are the ones that sound like they are making well thought out commentary. The "derp" type responses are eeasy to ignore, its the well though out ones that scare me.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on March 18, 2011, 03:02:08 PM
Yeah, it's totally Griffin's character that will alienate the rightwing nutjobs, and not at all the hot boy-on-boy makeout session (which was sweet, and very PG, but the first time I've ever seen gay teenage male characters kiss on TV).  :drillf:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on March 18, 2011, 04:44:23 PM
Well, it's easier to rail against an obvious stereotype and look like you're not being a homophobic asshat than rail against the squicky boy on boy action and reveal yourself to be a homophobic asshat.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on March 18, 2011, 10:42:00 PM
Pfft! They didn't like Glee anyway!


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on May 18, 2011, 11:52:14 AM
Was anybody else expecting Sue, at any minute, to go
WTF? Totally didn't work for me. Also, the "A" plot (auditions for star player) was filler, and boring.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: voodoolily on May 19, 2011, 01:57:53 PM
I was a little surprised that she didn't do that. Oh well. Sue has a little heart after all.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on May 19, 2011, 03:06:39 PM
I'm actually not, for all her inner bitch, Sue has always had a soft spot for her sister or anything that reminds her of her.  Her taking Becky into the Cheerios is just an example of that.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on May 19, 2011, 09:20:01 PM
Oh Sue definitely has a soft spot. But there was no indication to viewers that her sister actually died. For all we know, she could have hired the funeral attendants as actors. Bah, I feel cheated.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on May 19, 2011, 09:48:33 PM
Oh Sue definitely has a soft spot. But there was no indication to viewers that her sister actually died. For all we know, she could have hired the funeral attendants as actors. Bah, I feel cheated.

That's what I mean though, I don't think she would ever use her sister like that.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on May 20, 2011, 12:00:14 AM
I think she pretty clearly would.

Actually, it wouldn't be using her sister, in any way. It would be Sue and her sister cooking up some shennanigans together. They did it before when they "emancipated" themselves from their mother, in the wedding episode. They high-fived at the end, and read storybooks together. That's the sort of thing we were given to expect with this episode. So when that didn't happen, it fell flat.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 20, 2011, 06:23:05 AM
No, she would not. Thats an area she will not cross. She may be evil, but he sister transcends this. Every villain has a reason for being a villain, he sister is a huge part of that. That does not mean she wont use her passing as more fuel however, hence running for office.

Also, hay look, the jock is gay and confused, who would have thunk it.  :oh_i_see:


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on May 20, 2011, 07:47:59 AM
No, she would not. Thats an area she will not cross. She may be evil, but he sister transcends this. Every villain has a reason for being a villain, he sister is a huge part of that. That does not mean she wont use her passing as more fuel however, hence running for office.

I agree that she wouldn't use her sister. But she would scheme with her sister, because she's done it before.

Quote
Also, hay look, the jock is gay and confused, who would have thunk it.  :oh_i_see:

He's a big sweetiepants now.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on May 20, 2011, 01:52:27 PM
No, she would not. Thats an area she will not cross. She may be evil, but he sister transcends this. Every villain has a reason for being a villain, he sister is a huge part of that. That does not mean she wont use her passing as more fuel however, hence running for office.

I agree that she wouldn't use her sister. But she would scheme with her sister, because she's done it before.


She's never schemed with her sister.  The event that you referred to happened many years ago when the Sue and her sister were young.  Her mother wasn't around so Sue got them both emancipated, since she was the one taking care of both of them anyway.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on May 20, 2011, 02:19:37 PM
The event I'm referring to was this season; Sue's wedding, where she married herself, culminating with Sue and Jean high-fiving in bed curled up with a book, in an "us against the world" moment.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Slyfeind on May 24, 2011, 10:27:58 PM
Finale. Spectacular. Lots of fun. Nothing too big, just a good fun episode.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Morat20 on January 23, 2013, 06:06:14 PM
Just to rez the thread: Apparently Glee just up and decided to rip off Jonathan Coulton. They took his arrangement of Baby Got Back and decided to use it. (I think it's on tomorrow?).

Apparently not only did they not bother to change it at all (having pretty much just stolen the karoake version he put out) but they even left in the line "Johnny C's in trouble" which I'd imagine is gonna be hard to explain.

Fox's apparent position is they got permission from the owner of Baby Got Back, and don't need Coulton's at all. Or even to mention it to him. Legally, derivative works ARE covered under copyright (and Coulton had permission to use Baby Got Back) and if nothing else the instrumental and backing tracks to his version are entirely different than the original.

Even if Fox's legal wonks are correct, it's still kind of a dickish thing to do. (And apparently not the first time -- they ripped off DJ Earworm too, apparently, awhile back).


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Johny Cee on January 23, 2013, 08:49:18 PM
Just to rez the thread: Apparently Glee just up and decided to rip off Jonathan Coulton. They took his arrangement of Baby Got Back and decided to use it. (I think it's on tomorrow?).

Apparently not only did they not bother to change it at all (having pretty much just stolen the karoake version he put out) but they even left in the line "Johnny C's in trouble" which I'd imagine is gonna be hard to explain.

Fox's apparent position is they got permission from the owner of Baby Got Back, and don't need Coulton's at all. Or even to mention it to him. Legally, derivative works ARE covered under copyright (and Coulton had permission to use Baby Got Back) and if nothing else the instrumental and backing tracks to his version are entirely different than the original.

Even if Fox's legal wonks are correct, it's still kind of a dickish thing to do. (And apparently not the first time -- they ripped off DJ Earworm too, apparently, awhile back).

Why am I in trouble?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Surlyboi on January 23, 2013, 08:56:33 PM
Because when you see that round thing in your face you get sprung?


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: eldaec on January 23, 2013, 11:55:09 PM
Watched a couple of s4 episodes.

This show is now broken. They need to cut the fucking cord and let the New York plot go.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Ironwood on January 24, 2013, 05:41:17 AM
JC is being such a good sport about this.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Johny Cee on January 24, 2013, 08:12:49 AM
Because when you see that round thing in your face you get sprung?

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3577/3691506212_625d2eb3e0.jpg)


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Morat20 on January 24, 2013, 04:58:25 PM
Because when you see that round thing in your face you get sprung?
He does need to get his springer unsprung. Or resprung. I don't know how cyborgs work.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on July 14, 2013, 03:33:31 AM
Although I don't watch this show much anymore there was some sad news.  Cory Monteith aka Finn Hudson was found dead in his hotel room last night.  He was 31.

He was pretty talented and had a future ahead of him even after the show.  Although from what I've read he's had a drug problem since he was 13 and was recently in rehab.  No foul play is suspected, but I assume it's drug related.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Trippy on July 14, 2013, 10:14:47 PM
Yeah it's sad.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Teleku on July 17, 2013, 07:45:41 AM
Yeah, fatal combo of alcohol and heroin from what I read.

Though perhaps the saddest part is that the very last thing he tweeted about before dying was SHARKNADO.


Title: Re: Glee
Post by: Evildrider on July 17, 2013, 11:28:48 AM
From what I read it looks like his "friends" in Canada were pretty bad for feeding his habit too.  He'd do good when he was in the states and around his gf Lea Michelle, but he'd always be right back into it when he went home to Canada.  I guess they were even trying to stop him from even going back up there.