Title: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 21, 2009, 06:17:59 PM Ok, I'm making the final push in talks with the wife to let me buy a PS3. What do I need to buy with it?
I'm fairly certain I need an extra HDMI cable and a second controller, but what else? How does the wireless hold up? I can't run a network cable for it. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on May 21, 2009, 06:20:06 PM Ok, I'm making the final push in talks with the wife to let me buy a PS3. What do I need to buy with it? I'm fairly certain I need an extra HDMI cable and a second controller, but what else? How does the wireless hold up? I can't run a network cable for it. Networking has worked fine for me so far. I haven't bought any additional peripherals for it. The HDMI cable I'm using is the one that came with my 360 Elite :grin: To expand a bit on the networking, I've only had problems when streaming HD tv shows to it. I've had to degrade the quality a bit using the Google PS3 media server. My PS3 is a fair distance from my router, however. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on May 21, 2009, 06:40:05 PM A terry cloth. Motherfucker collects dust more than any other electronic device, ever.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 21, 2009, 06:52:20 PM A terry cloth. Motherfucker collects dust more than any other electronic device, ever. From sitting around not being used? It's gotta do better than my Wii. Or did you mean literally? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on May 21, 2009, 06:54:51 PM Literally. My PS3 rarely spends a day without being powered on at least once. I meant that it's a dust-magnet.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 21, 2009, 07:13:30 PM Yeah, mine seems to get pretty dusty too.
Do the new PS3 packages come with rumble controllers? If not, I guess you should get some. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on May 21, 2009, 08:05:06 PM What do I need to buy with it? PS3 remote, If your going to do any media playback its cheap and works very well, as the only other option is the controller. Perhaps a bluetooth headset if you want to chat, just use a usb headset for comfort. How does the wireless hold up? I can't run a network cable for it. Found the wireless sketchy on media playback. Al tho I changed wifi routers and playback server so should really test it out again. Btw, grab ps3mediaserver (http://code.google.com/p/ps3mediaserver/) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 21, 2009, 08:10:25 PM I converted all of my movies to PS3 capable MPGs using handbrake and am able to stream 720p ones flawlessly over a WRT45G router that got equipped with OpenWRT.
I've really had no issues with wireless. PS3 remote is worth every penny. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on May 21, 2009, 08:13:08 PM I think you meant MP4s.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on May 21, 2009, 08:15:35 PM I converted all of my movies to PS3 capable MPGs using handbrake and am able to stream 720p ones flawlessly over a WRT45G router that got equipped with OpenWRT. I've really had no issues with wireless. Had a wrt54gl with dd-wrt using wpa2 and a pretty good db signal dropped all the time with "connection lost to server". Never could get past a ~45min show. We're talking a wifi signal of los five feet away. I'm convinced that router was cursed, playing with a new wrt54g2 atm. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 21, 2009, 08:23:49 PM I think you meant MP4s. No, I mean H264 encoded .mpgs.Fuser, I don't use any of that "on the fly" streaming conversion bullshit. I'm sure that stuff isn't helping. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on May 21, 2009, 08:39:13 PM I think you meant MP4s. No, I mean H264 encoded .mpgs.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 21, 2009, 08:51:26 PM I think you meant MP4s. No, I mean H264 encoded .mpgs.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on May 21, 2009, 11:19:54 PM I got the media remote... and never use it. The controller does just fine for me. If you plan to play multiplayer games at all I'd suggest a headset - the official one is supposed to be good but seems to be out of stock everywhere (in the UK anyway).
Can't comment on the wireless, never used it. Of course the other thing you'll be needing is a copy of Demon's Souls :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on May 22, 2009, 07:04:55 AM Uncharted.
Flower. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 22, 2009, 07:06:39 AM Ok, so gathering from this the only must-haves when I leave the store are an HDMI cable and some games. Thanks a ton, all. Now please to be wishing me lucks.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 22, 2009, 07:09:32 AM Yea, you'll need it, since you're buying a PS3 a mere few weeks before the slim is probably going to be announced.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on May 22, 2009, 07:13:56 AM Yea, you'll need it, since you're buying a PS3 a mere few weeks before the slim is probably going to be announced. There also is a rumored price drop happening soon too or has it already happened? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 22, 2009, 08:03:16 AM Yea, you'll need it, since you're buying a PS3 a mere few weeks before the slim is probably going to be announced. There also is a rumored price drop happening soon too or has it already happened? No one outside of Sony corporate/marketing knows when though. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on May 22, 2009, 08:08:28 AM I suppose if I had anything to add for a new PS3 buyer, it would be to immediately buy a larger 2.5" hard disk so that you don't later have to bother with transferring your data.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on May 22, 2009, 08:40:25 AM There's always a PS3 price drop happening soon. No one outside of Sony corporate/marketing knows when though. I can't see it happening with the way Sony is bleeding right now (the whole company, not just the games division). Plus, does't it still cost them like $40 for every PS3 sold? Honestly, I'd probably have already bought a PS3 if I didn't have a 360 already. Drake's Fortune, God of War 3, and Infamous all look like great exclusives. Are they worth a $400-$500 investment in a new console when I already have a comparable game machine? Nope. I can't be alone in this. Sony is just flat out boned for this generation. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 22, 2009, 08:49:11 AM Ok, I'm making the final push in talks with the wife to let me buy a PS3. What do I need to buy with it? I'm fairly certain I need an extra HDMI cable and a second controller, but what else? How does the wireless hold up? I can't run a network cable for it. HDMI cable, and wireless works great. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rattran on May 22, 2009, 10:28:28 AM Mine came with a hdmi cable, but I got a 20 gig. Are the newer ones not?
Monoprice (http://www.monoprice.com) is good for cheap cables, having color coordinated hdmi makes figuring out which goes where much easier, blue/ps3 red/hd-dvd green/360 Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 22, 2009, 11:12:40 AM Yea, you'll need it, since you're buying a PS3 a mere few weeks before the slim is probably going to be announced. Yep, I'm waiting at least a week or two post-E3 till I buy. I have that exact luck: as soon as I buy it the PS4 will be announced. heh. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Quinton on May 23, 2009, 12:15:20 AM Oh, snap. Right, I use handbrake for my ipod touch. Not my PS3. Hurf durf. Though, really, we're just derailing this. Anyway, yes, I use MKV2VOB. Derail is fine -- I'm interested in using my PS3 to play transcoded DVD content. Is MKV2VOB a single step thing or do I need to rip the DVDs with something else first? I'd love to get all my DVDs on the NAS in some format that doesn't lose (much) quality, suitable for playback on the PS3. I also vote for buying a PS3 remote -- the thing makes a great bluray player. Also I love the fact that the DVD player will do a straight 2x scale rather than just stretch-to-fit 1920x1080... much cleaner scaling that way. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 12:29:41 AM Not sure. Will check tomorrow.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 23, 2009, 12:43:09 AM I can't see it happening with the way Sony is bleeding right now (the whole company, not just the games division). Plus, does't it still cost them like $40 for every PS3 sold? Honestly, I'd probably have already bought a PS3 if I didn't have a 360 already. Drake's Fortune, God of War 3, and Infamous all look like great exclusives. Are they worth a $400-$500 investment in a new console when I already have a comparable game machine? Nope. I can't be alone in this. Sony is just flat out boned for this generation. To my mind, that would be the smartest thing they could do. The 360's proice drops have put the MS machine in many many homes that would not have had them in. Which is where your second paragraph comes in.. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rendakor on May 23, 2009, 12:46:35 AM Honestly, I'd probably have already bought a PS3 if I didn't have a 360 already. Drake's Fortune, God of War 3, and Infamous all look like great exclusives. Are they worth a $400-$500 investment in a new console when I already have a comparable game machine? Nope. I can't be alone in this. Sony is just flat out boned for this generation. I'm with you Big Gulp. I bought a 360 before the PS3 released, and with the system priced so high I can't justify it for anything out (or on the horizon). Losing the one exclusive I really cared about (FFXIII) was the nail in the coffin. Unless PS3 turns into JRPG heaven like the PS2 did, I'll probably wait til PS4/Xbox9001. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 23, 2009, 12:54:26 AM I don't think they're comparable. Maybe at first glance, I guess.. But there are subtle things about the system that when stacked up, makes it priced accordingly. I'd say that it was harder to stomach when released, but the 360 wasn't exactly cheap either. Not to mention that the PS3's price is relative to the 360, just for being released after it. Hell, relative pricing even lets Nintendo get away with the Wii's pricetag too. Which, technically, is far more ridiculous.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on May 23, 2009, 01:17:58 AM Derail is fine -- I'm interested in using my PS3 to play transcoded DVD content. Is MKV2VOB a single step thing or do I need to rip the DVDs with something else first? I'd love to get all my DVDs on the NAS in some format that doesn't lose (much) quality, suitable for playback on the PS3. Handbrake will rip DVDs, mkv2vob will convert to MP4 that the PS3 will play. It's pretty much lossless to my eyes, in fact some US import DVDs I ripped look better than playing from the DVD directly. And PS3 Media Server (http://code.google.com/p/ps3mediaserver/) running somewhere is a lot better for navigating etc. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on May 23, 2009, 01:21:51 AM Oh, snap. Right, I use handbrake for my ipod touch. Not my PS3. Hurf durf. Though, really, we're just derailing this. Anyway, yes, I use MKV2VOB. Derail is fine -- I'm interested in using my PS3 to play transcoded DVD content. Is MKV2VOB a single step thing or do I need to rip the DVDs with something else first? I'd love to get all my DVDs on the NAS in some format that doesn't lose (much) quality, suitable for playback on the PS3.mkv2vob is used to convert the latest high-quality Torrent movie standard of H.264 video and AC-3 audio in an MKV container file (superseding the older Xvid and MP3 in an AVI standard) to a VOB container that can play on a PS3. The PS3 can't read MKVs directly but it does support this funky H.264 in VOB format (H.264 in a VOB container is not part of the VOB spec, it's something Sony hacked support into). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Quinton on May 23, 2009, 01:53:53 AM If you rip your DVD into a single VOB file (a normal DVD has the movie split across multiple VOB files) the PS3 will play that fine without any conversion necessary. Oh, awesome. Disk is pretty cheap -- I'd love to just keep it in the original encoding. Are there any decent tools for ripping into a single vob? I forget what I used last time, but it did a filesystem level copy of the DVDs, giving me the multiple vob files and other gunk. Quote mkv2vob is used to convert the latest high-quality Torrent movie standard of H.264 video and AC-3 audio in an MKV container file (superseding the older Xvid and MP3 in an AVI standard) to a VOB container that can play on a PS3. The PS3 can't read MKVs directly but it does support this funky H.264 in VOB format (H.264 in a VOB container is not part of the VOB spec, it's something Sony hacked support into). Also very cool. I'm way behind the state of the art on this stuff. Yeah, all the TV I've been grabbing lately has been h264 in mkv containers. If I can easily convert this for playing with the ps3, I could ditch the little PC by the TV entirely. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on May 23, 2009, 02:21:08 AM If you rip your DVD into a single VOB file (a normal DVD has the movie split across multiple VOB files) the PS3 will play that fine without any conversion necessary. Oh, awesome. Disk is pretty cheap -- I'd love to just keep it in the original encoding. Are there any decent tools for ripping into a single vob? I forget what I used last time, but it did a filesystem level copy of the DVDs, giving me the multiple vob files and other gunk.If you go to Mode -> IFO it'll automatically select what it thinks is the main movie title (as in DVD title, not the name of the movie) and all of the chapters will be selected*. Under Tools -> Settings -> IFO Mode make sure "File Splitting" is set to "None". Then you just pick a place to put it and it'll put it all in a single VOB. You'll keep all the audio tracks and subtitles, if they are there, but you lose all the chapter markers, which can make navigation cumbersome depending on the player software. * If for some reason you only want some chapters (like you have a favorite scene you want to make into a separate movie) you can right click in that chapter selection box, "Select None", and then manually select the chapters you want to put into a VOB file. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on May 23, 2009, 04:25:07 AM I don't think they're comparable. Maybe at first glance, I guess.. Honestly, how are they not comparable? They're direct competitors for Christ's sake! I can see the whole, "But it plays Bluray!" argument, but frankly I just don't give a shit about that, particularly when I'm a filthy pirate who rips all his movies and blank Bluray media is too expensive. Beyond that? Yeah, they're comparable. They both play the same games more or less, at the same level of competency. This isn't like the Wii where a ported game has to take a massive drop in quality. We're still talking apples to apples here. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 23, 2009, 05:35:40 AM I wasn't saying any of that to particularly sell you on Blu-Ray or anything. To each his own. You're not right nor wrong. I was more interested in your general statement: "Sony is flat out boned this generation". And I think it's because the things that made it expensive, while justified, weren't obvious benefits from a gaming standpoint - like, say, much better graphics would be. You're an example of many people who don't give a shit about Blu-Ray, and therefore you put no value in it. So in turn, you just call the systems comparable. And if they are comparable in your mind, then sure, I see no reason to not pay less for a 360. It's exactly what you want.
Unfortunately, Sony is boned because quite a lot of you just wanted that too. But maybe boned is strong word. Definitely fail of some sort, but it's not like it's going anywhere, nor are the titles lacking or going to be lacking. It's still cool to have around, for sure. Not like some 3DO or some shit. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 23, 2009, 05:55:35 AM HD wars is (are?) the reason the PS3 blu-ray more expensive yadda yadda. Except BRD players are now much cheaper than buying an overpriced machine that plays pretty much the same thing as my 360 with fewer exclusives than I have fingers on one hand that I give a shit about while not upscaling my ps2 games.
Ahhh deja-vu threads. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 07:20:54 AM Yea, but you have shitty taste in games otherwise you'd have bought a PS3 already for Demon's Souls and Uncharted. But hey, don't let reality get in the way of shitty taste.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hindenburg on May 23, 2009, 07:24:21 AM You're all going full retard.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 07:27:30 AM You're all going full retard. Just saying. You don't get an opinion. You live in a country that probably spent less in total on legitimate games than *I* did last year.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hindenburg on May 23, 2009, 07:28:29 AM You're all going full retard. Just saying. You live in a country that Fix'd Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 23, 2009, 08:00:59 AM HD wars is (are?) the reason the PS3 blu-ray more expensive yadda yadda. Except BRD players are now much cheaper than buying an overpriced machine that plays pretty much the same thing as my 360 with fewer exclusives than I have fingers on one hand that I give a shit about while not upscaling my ps2 games. Ahhh deja-vu threads. :awesome_for_real: It isn't deja vu, because I care even less these days. As for exclusives, I don't even play games in general as much anymore, and I still can see that there are more than 5 good exclusives. For you to still like games, and say that, kind of amazes me. You have great hate, sir. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on May 23, 2009, 08:14:16 AM It isn't deja vu, because I care even less these days. As for exclusives, I don't even play games in general as much anymore, and I still can see that there are more than 5 good exclusives. For you to still like games, and say that, kind of amazes me. You have great hate, sir. :awesome_for_real: 5 is subjective. For instance, I've never understood the appeal of the Metal Gear series, so I'd pass that up even if it was on the 360. Demon's Souls? Isn't that basically just a Diablo clone? Yep, don't like that style of game. I'd have jumped on Little Big Planet if the controls hadn't shit the bed and made the game a whole lot less cool. For me that leaves Uncharted, Infamous, and the still unreleased God of War 3. What else am I missing that isn't a pile of Japanese stupidity? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 08:20:36 AM Quote Demon's Souls? Isn't that basically just a Diablo clone? Yep, don't like that style of game. You're just being ignorant now. Stop that. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on May 23, 2009, 08:24:22 AM Quote Demon's Souls? Isn't that basically just a Diablo clone? Yep, don't like that style of game. You're just being ignorant now. Stop that. I honestly don't know. Hence the question mark. I guess I could have looked it up, but I don't own a PS3, and therefore don't care. Of course, this kind of leads us back to the whole "Sony is boned" argument. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 08:25:44 AM Quote Demon's Souls? Isn't that basically just a Diablo clone? Yep, don't like that style of game. You're just being ignorant now. Stop that.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Musashi on May 23, 2009, 09:14:36 AM Foresaw this at first title glance.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 09:19:14 AM It was all fine and dandy until people came in who have absolutely no fucking interest in the console. It's like, "Why even click on the thread?"
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Musashi on May 23, 2009, 09:29:56 AM We come to the cockroach races to watch the cockroaches crash.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hoax on May 23, 2009, 09:38:01 AM Live costs money.
That is all. Also for the first time ever someone made hardware worse then Sony hardware. Fuck 360 Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Merusk on May 23, 2009, 10:21:15 AM So there's a slim coming out, eh? Any rumors on the price point? The wife and daughter are big Kingdom Hearts fans and I'm under penalty of death if I buy a 360 instead of a PS3, so I'm waiting it out at this point but that's good news for me.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Koyasha on May 23, 2009, 01:13:20 PM The two real questions for me will be, will the slim be reasonably priced, and will it have full backwards compatibility. I won't buy a PS3 without the latter, and can't buy it without the former.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 23, 2009, 01:40:47 PM I strongly doubt any iteration of the PS3 will do backwards compat. They're making too much money from PS2s still. I would love having it all in one console, but at the end of the day I just won't buy/play PS2 games if I get a PS3. I'd love it, but doubt it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Koyasha on May 23, 2009, 01:49:07 PM It's something of a matter of principle for me, because they had it at one time and then removed it. If they had never had full BC in the first place (like the 360) I wouldn't have this much of a hangup over it, but the idea that they had it and took it out pisses me off to the point that I refuse to give them money.
That said, if I ever have the money and see an old 60gb version with the hardware BC on ebay or something and feel in the right mood, I might chance buying it in that manner. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 23, 2009, 02:06:42 PM Quote It's something of a matter of principle for me, because they had it at one time and then removed it. What they took out was the PS2 chips that were just soldered onto the mainboard of the PS3. This is probably one of the reasons along with nanometer reduction that they were able to make a slim model at all. I can see being pissed about say, a giant 80GB without hardware back compat, but a slim model? That makes no sense. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: frankaustin on May 23, 2009, 04:22:19 PM Didn't some of the other models have software-based backwards compatibility, though? The 60gb and original 80gb models were both software-based, I thought. I remember being pretty annoyed that Sony decided to remove the software backwards compatibility from later models, and it wouldn't affect a slim model at all.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: IainC on May 23, 2009, 04:35:01 PM The Euro versions have no backwards compatibility at all, hardware or software.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Fordel on May 23, 2009, 04:46:13 PM I think I need a chart to keep track of all the PS3 versions around.
I'm only half being a smart ass here. :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: frankaustin on May 23, 2009, 04:54:02 PM I think I need a chart to keep track of all the PS3 versions around. I'm only half being a smart ass here. :uhrr: Ask and ye shall receive. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS3#Models) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Quinton on May 23, 2009, 06:36:05 PM Quote It's something of a matter of principle for me, because they had it at one time and then removed it. What they took out was the PS2 chips that were just soldered onto the mainboard of the PS3. This is probably one of the reasons along with nanometer reduction that they were able to make a slim model at all. The best of my understanding (based on interactions with some friend who work there and general observations) is that they thought they were going to be able to do entirely software based ps2 emulation, then it took longer than planned so they dropped in the ps2 chipset (similar to how ps2 "emulates" psx) as a stop-gap, then they either decided it was going to be really hard or expensive to actually make the software emulation solution work and/or just wasn't worth it. Which makes me glad I bought a launch PS3 which can play PS2 content. I bet we eventually see PS2 emulation, if only so that they can sell the PS2 library to us again via playstation store. If it's technically difficult (which I think it is -- PS2 is a really bizarro machine which would be a pain to emulate well without a *lot* of headroom), we might not see this until PS4 or whatever the next generation is. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Koyasha on May 23, 2009, 07:24:16 PM Didn't some of the other models have software-based backwards compatibility, though? The 60gb and original 80gb models were both software-based, I thought. I remember being pretty annoyed that Sony decided to remove the software backwards compatibility from later models, and it wouldn't affect a slim model at all. Yeah, removing the chip I can sort of understand, but both models in production now don't even have the limited software BC that the older ones did, and I suspect a slim version wouldn't either, and I see no technical reason why they can't. It may not be perfect BC, but neither is the 360's.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 23, 2009, 10:51:38 PM Yeah i'm glad i got an original model with the chip. Still a lot of entertainment to be had from the PS2
edit - that said, i'd be compelled to sell it for a hefty price :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on May 26, 2009, 08:31:30 AM My library of 360 games outnumbers my PS3 games something like 20:1. That said, I think the PS3 is a superior machine in nearly every way. Blu Ray. Built-in wireless. Negative RROD. Quieter. Connections. Nicer looking (eye of the beholder). Probably some other stuff I'm forgetting.
Also, I know some people aren't sold on Blu Ray. These are people I'll never understand. With the right setup, it is completely amazing and a whole metric fuckton better than standard DVD. The PS3 is, by most accounts, a really good BR player, and that justified the purchase as far as I am concerned. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on May 26, 2009, 09:06:35 AM Yeah i'm glad i got an original model with the chip. Still a lot of entertainment to be had from the PS2 I've got a slim PS2. So it finds itself easily on the TV stand shelves. Quote My library of 360 games outnumbers my PS3 games something like 20:1. That said, I think the PS3 is a superior machine in nearly every way. Blu Ray. Built-in wireless. Negative RROD. Quieter. Connections. Nicer looking (eye of the beholder). Probably some other stuff I'm forgetting. I'd almost rather play anything on the PS3 just because of the noise. The 360 is obnoxiously loud. The two game libraries of mine as starting to converge, but I've traded in a lot of 360 games and the only PS3 game that's made it back to Gamestop is LittleBigPlanet (I made some reaches with 360 game purchases that didn't work out). Still, the 360 is going to get exclusives and Bioware games will hit it before they're ported to PC, so it'll always have its use. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 26, 2009, 10:14:36 AM I'll get one in Sept/Oct I've been promised. It's a big purchase for us right now because we're paying off some debts. Shouldn't be too bad though, maybe I'll hear about a price drop before then, or the slimline unit.
Meh. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 26, 2009, 10:15:51 AM EA bought the Mass Effect IP. I'd imagine Bioware stuff will hit the PS3 also.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on May 26, 2009, 10:18:39 AM Well, I guess we've all learned who wears the pantalones over at the old Hawbit estate. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on May 26, 2009, 02:04:49 PM Sony kinda doesn't seem to want people to buy the thing though. Too expensive, and they pulled out BC with entirely too many models of the machine.
Given how insanely successful the PS2 is this is a serious drawback. I have too big of a PS2 library to buy an overpriced machine with a handful of worthwhile games! If I could get a used 20 gig for 200 or 250 for the 60 with BC I would for Little Big Planet, Disgaea 3, and Valkyria Chronicles. The Blu Ray and improved video output for my PS1 and 2 games would make the expenditure worth it. But as it stands, I am currently thinking about getting a 100 dollar slim PS2 to replace my aging early 00 machine and ignoring Sony this generation entirely. They seem about ready to do the same sort of incompatibility fuckup with the PSP, turning it into an iPod Touch except without half the popularity if not more. (And existing owners lose access to their UMD games? WTF?) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ingmar on May 26, 2009, 02:22:27 PM Infamous is the first PS3-only title that's really made me QQ a little that I can't get it. Going to take more than that to get me to spring for the console price given the economy though.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 26, 2009, 05:35:33 PM Well, I guess we've all learned who wears the pantalones over at the old Hawbit estate. :awesome_for_real: She's an attorney defending bank-side foreclosures. I'm a pseudo-librarian. She wears her pants and mine. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 26, 2009, 06:25:06 PM Afrika seems to be coming to America courtesy of Natsume.
This is a pretty amazing era for Sony, somehow among all their hubris, they seem to be inviting other devs into the PS3-era by letting them publish SCEI titles (the other 2 being Demon's Souls/Atlus and BADMAN (Yuusha)/NISA). Excitement. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: cosapi on May 27, 2009, 12:39:39 PM The ps3 seems to be the most appealing out of the three console systems at the moment. Truly the greatest joy of this console generation was not owning any. But I picked up demons souls asian version like 2 weeks before atlus announced the US release. I don't even own any current gen systems but didn't want to have to deal with the possibility of Demons Souls going for 100+ used in 1-2 years from now. Especially since it seemed to be one of the reasons to get a ps3 because it looks decent + unique, regardless of the fact based on what I've seen and heard about it, it sounds like "I Wanna Be The Guy The PS3 Game". So I doubt it's much like diablo. Diablo has always been more like Gauntlet NES with loot. Only reason to play = Necromancer.
If I absolutely had to go with a current gen console system, the ps3 seems like the one which sucks the least. 360 only has value if you import, for me anyways (cave shooters). And the wii, well, it's the wii. The only games of interest seem to be No More Heroes, that new Vanillaware game and Sin and Punishment 2. As for games like Galaxy and Smash Bros? No Thanks, I was tired of those before they were released. I was planning to get a ps3 after demons souls arrived, but since e3 was so close I figured I'd wait and see if any changes would be made. Though it's very unlikely, still planning to wait till after. My reasons for wanting a ps3 = Valkyria Chronicles, Demons Souls, MGS, "Project Trico"lol, and maybe Steambot Chronicles 2. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Murgos on May 27, 2009, 12:42:02 PM The ps3 seems to be the most appealing out of the three console systems at the moment. Truly the greatest joy of this console generation was not owning any. But I picked up demons souls asian version like 2 weeks before atlus announced the US release. I don't even own any current gen systems but didn't want to have to deal with the possibility of Demons Souls going for 100+ used in 1-2 years from now. Especially since it seemed to be one of the reasons to get a ps3 because it looks decent + unique, regardless of the fact based on what I've seen and heard about it, it sounds like "I Wanna Be The Guy The PS3 Game". So I doubt it's much like diablo. Diablo has always been more like Gauntlet NES with loot. Only reason to play = Necromancer. If I absolutely had to go with a current gen console system, the ps3 seems like the one which sucks the least. 360 only has value if you import, for me anyways (cave shooters). And the wii, well, it's the wii. The only games of interest seem to be No More Heroes, that new Vanillaware game and Sin and Punishment 2. As for games like Galaxy and Smash Bros? No Thanks, I was tired of those before they were released. I was planning to get a ps3 after demons souls arrived, but since e3 was so close I figured I'd wait and see if any changes would be made. Though it's very unlikely, still planning to wait till after. My reasons for wanting a ps3 = Valkyria Chronicles, Demons Souls, MGS, "Project Trico"lol, and maybe Steambot Chronicles 2. lol wat? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Morfiend on May 27, 2009, 01:29:13 PM (http://application.denofgeek.com/images/m/telek/scanners.jpg)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on May 27, 2009, 02:03:23 PM That was really fucking random.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on May 28, 2009, 05:06:38 AM I don't know how this got started, but Demon's Souls isn't like Diablo.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on May 28, 2009, 05:32:04 AM I don't know how this got started, but Demon's Souls isn't like Diablo. Yeah, well, you'll have a hard time proving that without sending me a copy of Demon Souls. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 28, 2009, 05:57:56 AM Yea, but you have shitty taste in games otherwise you'd have bought a PS3 already for Demon's Souls and Uncharted. But hey, don't let reality get in the way of shitty taste. It isn't deja vu, because I care even less these days. As for exclusives, I don't even play games in general as much anymore, and I still can see that there are more than 5 good exclusives. For you to still like games, and say that, kind of amazes me. You have great hate, sir. :awesome_for_real: There's Motorstorm and maybe the second one. Uncharted. Possibly Demons Souls and inFamous. That's 4.5 games I'm actively interested in playing. Not worth AU$700 to me just for the box that comes with a game or two I wouldn't have bought. Plus, say, AU$360 for the 5 above games (conservatively) brings me over $1k for that before even counting a second (or third, etc controller) or any other must have odds and bobs, or a new HDD. Not worth it. I'd probably do it if BC was still in it, but no, so, no. No personal interest in LBP, MGS, Resistance or Gran Turismo (or Halo, for that matter). I'd probably buy some Ratchet, even Singstar, etc if I owned the system but won't buy a system for Ratchet. I also don't give a shit about unreleased games that are in development. When they're released I'll start caring. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:PlayStation_3-only_games It was all fine and dandy until people came in who have absolutely no fucking interest in the console. It's like, "Why even click on the thread?" Don't you do this to pretty much every Wii or 360 thread? :roll: Besides, I have an interest in the console. Just not enough of an interest to buy one at this stage. I've always said here that I'll eventually get one, and that's probably still true. Really though, the BC is my sticking point at this stage. Now tell me about this Diablo game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 28, 2009, 10:31:31 AM PS3 = M.A.G (http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gameplay-premiere-mag/48643?type=flv)
/thread :why_so_serious: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Morfiend on May 28, 2009, 11:19:24 AM PS3 = M.A.G (http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gameplay-premiere-mag/48643?type=flv) /thread :why_so_serious: Using that logic. Phantom > PS3 and 360. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 28, 2009, 12:04:17 PM PS3 = M.A.G (http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gameplay-premiere-mag/48643?type=flv) /thread :why_so_serious: Using that logic. Phantom > PS3 and 360. :awesome_for_real: We are not using the same logic. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Soln on May 28, 2009, 12:28:19 PM We gave up on a media streaming server, and instead spent $100 on a brick USB. Far easier to move over all your files and watch them glitch free.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 28, 2009, 01:12:50 PM PS3 = M.A.G (http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gameplay-premiere-mag/48643?type=flv) /thread :why_so_serious: Yeah, looks nice. but FPS on a console using thumbsticks.. well I won't say = FAIL, but it's not for some of us, no matter how pretty the previews look. Also, GAMES IN THE FUTURE WILL BE BETTAR. Unreleased exclusives are irrelevent to me until they're released. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 28, 2009, 01:15:28 PM I do prefer my FPS with M&Kb. But, that looks sweet, and its made by zipper.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 28, 2009, 01:25:12 PM Also, GAMES IN THE FUTURE WILL BE BETTAR. Unreleased exclusives are irrelevent to me until they're released. Just say you don't care about the games of the present either, it's easier that way. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 28, 2009, 01:33:20 PM Why? Because I don't bother to jizz in my panties about something that may be out within a year? Or because I'm unfazed by half a dozen PS3 exclusives?
FWIW, the 360 at this point in time has fewer exclusives I would buy a system for, but that doesn't matter anymore because I already own the thing, and most of my games are non-exclusives anyway. Your wannabe snarky comment makes no sense anyway. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 28, 2009, 01:40:23 PM Snarky comment :awesome_for_real: Stop being so defensive. I'm just eating some pizza and talking a little bit here.
[edit] My "snarky comment's" point was that you were saying the same thing about games of the present, before they were released. You used that same kind of line, now they're here, you still don't care. Just unleash the hate already! :awesome_for_real: That's my point. And don't think I care that much to want to egg you on or anything. I don't really. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 28, 2009, 05:49:50 PM Defensive? Meh, you misinterpreted my tone as much as I did yours, baby. :heart: :awesome_for_real:
Not sure which games you're saying I was saying I don't care about before they were released. I'm sure there were upcoming but now-released games I didnt and continue to not give a fuck about, but that's par for the course for anyone. :awesome_for_real: The 4.5 PS3 exclusive games I listed I like, and would buy if they were on the 360. When I eventually get a PS3 I will snap them up, it's just not personally worthwhile for me right now. That shouldn't be too difficult to comprehend. :awesome_for_real: The rest of the PS3 exclusive library, and most all of the 360's exclusives I don't really care about. Most of the games I have a personal interest in are multiplatform. That shouldn't be too difficult to comprehend. :awesome_for_real: Those are the games I care about. I hope one day to marry one of them, I care for them so deeply. :awesome_for_real: :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on May 28, 2009, 08:00:02 PM Yeah, looks nice. but FPS on a console using thumbsticks.. well I won't say = FAIL, but it's not for some of us, no matter how pretty the previews look This part stood out to me. All the 360 has to really warrant purchasing it over any other console is shooters, so I found it odd when people say this, even factoring in the multiplatform. Not that I'm disagreeing about the mouse+keyboard bit... Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on May 28, 2009, 09:32:26 PM This part stood out to me. All the 360 has to really warrant purchasing it over any other console is shooters, so I found it odd when people say this, even factoring in the multiplatform. Not that I'm disagreeing about the mouse+keyboard bit... I bought my 360 for two reasons at the time: Chromehounds and Dead Rising. Strangely, I got a lot more value out of Chromehounds since I got into a really good clan of guys. Dead Rising is one of those games that should have been an instant classic but its random Japaneseness sabotaged it (stupid photo taking mini-game, escort mission hell, a finite time limit, etc). Unless a lot of that stuff is corrected, I'll probably skip DR2. Anyhow, what Azazel said goes for me, too. If I had to make the choice right now, I'd buy a PS3. I've already jumped into bed with a console, though, and the limited exclusives I'm interested in for that platform still don't compel me to shell out $400 minimum just to have the machine to play them. I still think Sony is boned this generation. To be fair, both MS and Sony got their asses handed to them by Nintendo, but Sony had such a huge position of strength last generation that losing so badly to MS has to gall them. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageru on May 28, 2009, 11:23:52 PM I find the huge companies subsidising the hardware and purchasing exclusives to give it value so distasteful I'm happy to miss out on anything unique to the console. Well, other than I wouldn't buy a wii anyway because while I like the concept of a casual gaming platform the actual product hurts my eyes too much. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 28, 2009, 11:36:28 PM I find the huge companies subsidising the hardware and purchasing exclusives to give it value so distasteful I'm happy to miss out on anything unique to the console. Out of curiosity, what exclusives do you think Sony bought? I'd really like to know. Unless you were talking about Microsoft. In which case, well, yes, that's always been their gameplan. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on May 29, 2009, 03:23:28 AM yeah, if anything some of the previous exclusives became non-exclusive because of microsoft's....mmm...deep well of generosity. really the only exclusives on PS3 are first and second house. and a few things that don't attract xbox gamer's as well, like jrpgs.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on May 29, 2009, 05:50:33 AM Pretty much in the same boat as some here. There are some exclusives I want, but not enough to shell out for another console at the PS3's current price point. They drop it down $100, and then I'm game. My 360 is enough for me otherwise.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageru on May 29, 2009, 06:55:44 AM Out of curiosity, what exclusives do you think Sony bought? I'd really like to know. Well, sure, microsoft have always used their monopoly supplied deep pockets to make up for the limitations of their products. I must admit I was surprised that you could suggest there are no PS3 exclusives. But I think what you are saying is that Sony funds or owns the game developers and thus isn't buying the exclusive rights to the title itself. Things like this - "Following this, Sony gave them a deal to develop LittleBigPlanet for the PlayStation 3 in exchange for exclusivity and ownership of the intellectual property" from wikipedia, them paying rockstar to produce a PS3 exclusive title, your comments in the demon soul's thread and the recent complaints over Sony messing about with ghostbusters makes it hard to argue they are not spending a lot of money slanting the market in favor of their own platform above and beyond any technical advantages it may have. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 29, 2009, 08:43:15 AM I'm quite serious when I say I have no clue what you're getting at and that your post is cryptic.
And how are they messing about with Ghostbusters? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageru on May 29, 2009, 09:06:36 AM They took over distribution and suddenly the xbox and PC release became "sometime later this year" rather than simultaneous is my understanding. I don't really follow console news that closely. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hindenburg on May 29, 2009, 09:10:44 AM Also, he explained why he holds the opinion that Sony "buys" exclusives.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 29, 2009, 09:18:46 AM In Europe, Ghostbusters might've been delayed, but then they didn't have a publisher at all in Europe at the time, as far as I know, no one was picking it up. In America, all the console versions are launching day and date together.
As for LittleBigPlanet, I think they courted the big 3. I know for a fact Nintendo turned them down first. I don't know if they went to Microsoft at all after Sony said yes. Quote I must admit I was surprised that you could suggest there are no PS3 exclusives. This comment makes no sense.Quote "Following this, Sony gave them a deal to develop LittleBigPlanet for the PlayStation 3 in exchange for exclusivity and ownership of the intellectual property" from wikipedia, them paying rockstar to produce a PS3 exclusive title, your comments in the demon soul's thread and the recent complaints over Sony messing about with ghostbusters makes it hard to argue they are not spending a lot of money slanting the market in favor of their own platform above and beyond any technical advantages it may have. I don't understand what you're saying about Demon's Souls here. From is neither Rockstars nor someone to have faith in prior to Demon's Souls. That was, as far as I'm concerned, total luck on their part.I can't think of a single case where Sony bought the rights to something and pulled Exclusivity away from Microsoft. Nintendo wouldn't make a good comparison because pulling an exclusive from them, well, that would just be strange. I don't even think Microsoft has tried to do that. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageru on May 29, 2009, 09:38:19 AM Sony paid the creators of little big planet and rockstar (and I am sure others) a huge amount of cash to make a game that will never be playable on the PC or 360. What definition of exclusive does that not fit? Simpler version. My PC is perfectly capable of playing little big planet. The studio that made little big planet would almost certainly make some additional cash (enough to cover porting or letting a third party do it) if they released a PC version on steam. They won't because under the terms of the contract with Sony they are not permitted to even if it made economic sense. Sony does this to increase the value of their proprietary hardware through making it the only way to play the game. The same argument no doubt works for a great many other titles (including things like demon soul's?). I find it distasteful and choose not to buy an un-needed duplicate hardware platform just because some corporations has tied games to owning it. They're legally entitled to make it a PS3 exclusive and I'm free to not buy it for that reason. This would be the same if I owned a PS3 and looked at microsoft exclusives. It would be a good result for the consumer if the market could decide which hardware platform is the best and games companies could decide which platforms they target. Purchasing or developing platform exclusive titles warps that. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 29, 2009, 09:52:16 AM Look, we know why people don't like exclusives.
But the majority of what you're saying is an entirely uneducated look at console gaming. What game did Sony pay a huge amount of money for? You do know Microsoft is the one paying for exclusive DLC right? And LA Noire was started back in the PS2 days when Sony didn't have to pay ANYONE for ANYTHING because they were the only game in town worth publishing on (hell, it might even be in production for the 360 as we speak). As for Little Big Planet, no, that's not quite how it worked sadly. I'm not sure Media Molecule ever wanted to do multiplatform stuff at all. The problem is you're using an argument that fits for Microsoft but makes no sense for Sony because you don't know: 1. How their exclusives came to be. 2. Don't follow console news. 3. Aren't very well informed as to the nature of the market. One of Sony's MAJOR problems this generation is the fact they're not doling out money for exclusives when what they desperately need is MOAR GAMES. More JRPGs, more good shooters, more Everything. They, by far, have the best first party games this gen and if they didn't before Demon's Souls/Uncharted, they sure as shit do now. But they just don't have the numbers they pulled back in the PS2 days. A lot of that is going to the Wii just because It's Cheap and has a large, if undefined (by publishers and marketing) userbase. Quote The same argument no doubt works for a great many other titles (including things like demon soul's?). No, they really really don't. It doesn't work at all simply because that's not Sony's gameplan. Look, there's a LOTS of things worth ragging on Sony for this gen. Their behavior with first party and exclusive games is not one of them. And for Demon's Souls, it's just a terrible argument. From doesn't make PC games (ever) and th game wouldn't have even worked on the 360 because the online component is a huge part of the game and Microsoft decided to split their userbase between silver and gold. Even if it wasn't a Sony owned IP, the game still wouldn't have come out on the 360.tl;dr Stop talking out of your ass. Unless you find some concrete example of Sony writing a huge check on a major product, you're just speaking from a totally uninformed position. Rag on something that's worth ragging on. Edit: The same goes for LittleBigPlanet btw, an online component that's sliced between paying and nonpaying people would ruin LittleBigPlanet. That's why Nintendo and Sony were the ones that were courted. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on May 29, 2009, 12:35:27 PM Sony's failure this generation has to do with 3 things.
1:Price 2:Price 3:Price Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Koyasha on May 29, 2009, 12:55:21 PM Yep. $200 less expensive at launch, and I would have gotten the PS3 within the first month or two. If any had been available, cause at that price they would have been selling out.
Now they're $200 less expensive, but they cut key functionality. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hoax on May 29, 2009, 03:41:14 PM Yeah $450 for a system is fucking stupid, no doubt about it. Never again I just don't like console games enough for it to be worth it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on May 29, 2009, 04:03:26 PM It's like everyone forgets how your nickled and dimed with the Xbox to even get a platform close to the PS3.
PS3 80Gb MGS Bundle $480 (I think, I had a crap load of giftgards etc but it's a lot less today) Xbox 360 Pro 60Gb $300 (Kung fu Panada/Lego Indy to get a jasper) Wireless adapter $90 Play and charge $30 Live! Gold $60 Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 29, 2009, 04:05:26 PM That's $60 per year, and a second controller + battery used to be $10 more, but I think they dropped in line when the PS3 ame out.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on May 29, 2009, 04:09:20 PM I'm not even going to mention the rage of a decent headset price.
$5-10 more for the remote control, it goes on and on... Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on May 29, 2009, 07:05:51 PM I'm not even going to mention the rage of a decent headset price. The PS3 pairs with any bluetooth headset right? I've tried several different headsets for my 360 and the best I found was my $1 cellphone headset. Which sucks. Also, has anyone tried this thing (http://www.splitfish.com/?uid=4nkpfqinh2cvv3t0) with the PS3? (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/680305/imgp7822.jpg) I'd like to know if there is lag and whether aiming feels mushy in-game. The revision released this year will be at E3 so I can imaginary test it out when I imaginary attend. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on May 29, 2009, 09:12:56 PM A friend swears by his, Schild was suppose to get one for review.. what happened with that?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on May 29, 2009, 09:20:02 PM A friend swears by his, Schild was suppose to get one for review.. what happened with that? They started releasing info about the new one.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on May 29, 2009, 09:28:05 PM It's like everyone forgets how your nickled and dimed with the Xbox to even get a platform close to the PS3. PS3 80Gb MGS Bundle $480 (I think, I had a crap load of giftgards etc but it's a lot less today) Xbox 360 Pro 60Gb $300 (Kung fu Panada/Lego Indy to get a jasper) Wireless adapter $90 Play and charge $30 Live! Gold $60 Not really - MS just offers an 'a la carte' approach versus Sony's 'everything in one box' arrangement. 360 = $200-300 Wireless adapter - I've got mine wired to my router right next to my PS3 and other consoles. Comically, I wish my Wii had an ethernet port out of the box. Wireless for something that will never get moved once connected is hardly a requirement. Play and charge - if you buy this, you fail. You can get 8 2500 MAh rechargeable AA batteries and a charger for $20, and never have to tether yourself to your console or leave it on all night just to charge your controller because the USB ports aren't powered unless the console is on. Gold - $30 for 13 months. If you're paying more for it, you should visit Amazon on occasion. For $250, you can be playing everything but the Sony exclusives. Sony needs to drop the price, but seeing as they're still losing ~$40 on each PS3, I'm not sure if they can. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hayduke on May 30, 2009, 12:32:06 PM I think being able to throw any 2.5" SATA drive in a PS3 merits consideration as well.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 30, 2009, 06:27:14 PM This part stood out to me. All the 360 has to really warrant purchasing it over any other console is shooters, so I found it odd when people say this, even factoring in the multiplatform. Not that I'm disagreeing about the mouse+keyboard bit... I bought my 360 about 18 months ago, not last week. The price difference, even then between ps3 and 360 was significant (it's even bigger now). Software was much more heavily slanted towards 360 in quality at the time. Also, Dead Rising and ZOMBIES! Though after playing it I found the same flaws with it that Big Gulp has. They both have positives and negatives as far as the accessories go, as well. Though wireless is a non-issue for me (I also have a Wii that I'll never hook up to the net because fuck buying a fucking RJ-45 plug for $80) I like how the PS3 can have any notebook HDD slotted in for a fraction of the cost of the 360's overpriced undersized HDDs. And so on in both directions. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Xanthippe on May 30, 2009, 09:23:06 PM We just got a PS3 a few weeks ago.
My son tells me that we absolutely cannot leave a disc in it when we power it down or else SOMETHING REALLY AWFUL WILL HAPPEN NO REALLY. I'm skeptical. What gives? Anyone know? Btw, wow am I impressed. Ratchet & Clank is the favorite of the few games we have. Crystal clear. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on May 30, 2009, 09:25:54 PM We just got a PS3 a few weeks ago. My son tells me that we absolutely cannot leave a disc in it when we power it down or else SOMETHING REALLY AWFUL WILL HAPPEN NO REALLY. I'm skeptical. What gives? Anyone know? I've left a disc in mine when powered down since I've had it. I'm afraid to do the same with my 360. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Quinton on May 30, 2009, 11:04:00 PM We just got a PS3 a few weeks ago. My son tells me that we absolutely cannot leave a disc in it when we power it down or else SOMETHING REALLY AWFUL WILL HAPPEN NO REALLY. I'm skeptical. What gives? Anyone know? Weird. Never heard of this. I bought my PS3 when the console launched in the US, and I believe it's almost always had a disc in it (either the last game I've been playing or movie I watched) since then, with no horrible side-effects that I'm aware of. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on May 30, 2009, 11:36:06 PM We just got a PS3 a few weeks ago. Is he worried that the disc is going to get damaged if he leaves it in? If so then he may have bought into the FUD that was going around during the Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD war days that Blu-Ray discs are easily damaged because the layer of plastic that sits between the "data material" and the outside world is thinner than it on an HD-DVD or a DVD disc. To compensate for this Blu-Ray discs have an "anti-scratch" coating (e.g. TDK's Durabis) to protect that side.My son tells me that we absolutely cannot leave a disc in it when we power it down or else SOMETHING REALLY AWFUL WILL HAPPEN NO REALLY. I'm skeptical. What gives? Anyone know? Btw, wow am I impressed. Ratchet & Clank is the favorite of the few games we have. Crystal clear. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mazakiel on May 31, 2009, 02:16:04 AM I've left discs in my PS3 since day one. BRD, DVD, games....not a single problem ever.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 31, 2009, 02:24:16 AM Never had an issue with discs left in my 360, either.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rattran on May 31, 2009, 04:52:17 AM I even drove my ps3 across the country with a disc in it (forgot about a bluray) with no ill effects. I think it's had a disc in it almost the entire time I've owned it.
And I bought the ps3 without wireless, as there's networking where it goes, and being able to simply pull out the 20gig drive and slot in a 320gig with no hassles was a joy after upgrading an xbox drive. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Xanthippe on May 31, 2009, 07:43:31 AM Thanks! It sounded dumb to me - I didn't think that it could be right.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on May 31, 2009, 10:04:23 AM Never had an issue with discs left in my 360, either. I'm sure nothing would come of me leaving discs in it. I'm just paranoid that I'm going to anger the Gods and red-ring the sucker. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on May 31, 2009, 03:01:06 PM Oh, psaw. That just happens naturally. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: funcro on June 04, 2009, 07:16:39 AM So no price cut announced at E3. I still want to play Demon's Souls when the Atlus US release is available. Buy now with the Dell 15% off + free shipping coupon or continue holding for a price cut?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 04, 2009, 08:30:54 AM I say wait for a slim, but that's logic talking (yes, I still think it's coming this year)
I always buy something when I can afford it. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tige on June 04, 2009, 08:35:20 AM So no price cut announced at E3. I still want to play Demon's Souls when the Atlus US release is available. Buy now with the Dell 15% off + free shipping coupon or continue holding for a price cut? Chances are you'll piss away the difference 8 times over by the time the price actually drops or if/when there will be a slim. Buy now if you can, import DS and your gaming world will be complete. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 04, 2009, 09:55:28 AM Dell has had PS3 offers quite a few times over the past three months. Don't make it seem like it's now or never.
Damn I really want one. There's a pretty fair number of games I'd like to see now. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Oz on June 04, 2009, 10:01:10 AM do what i did. start saving up little bits of cash. $20 here, $5 there, maybe an occasional $50, by the time you have actual money saved up maybe the slim will be here or maybe a cheaper PS3 in general.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on June 04, 2009, 10:30:18 AM So no price cut announced at E3. I still want to play Demon's Souls when the Atlus US release is available. Buy now with the Dell 15% off + free shipping coupon or continue holding for a price cut? You could always keep an eye on ebay. Got my PS3 there for $250 in perfect condition. I'd recommend checking the Buy it Now listings every so often (regular auctions always seem to end up fairly close to retail price, whereas with Buy it Now you can sometimes catch someone who doesn't know any better putting one up pretty cheap). If you find something for a good price, make sure the seller has a good feedback rating, read through the description a couple times to make sure you know what you're getting, and don't hesitate to ask the seller questions. Making a major purchase over ebay can be a bit scary for some people, but as long as you take all the proper steps, you should be ok. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on June 04, 2009, 11:10:10 AM So no price cut announced at E3. I still want to play Demon's Souls when the Atlus US release is available. Buy now with the Dell 15% off + free shipping coupon or continue holding for a price cut? You could always keep an eye on ebay. Got my PS3 there for $250 in perfect condition. I'd recommend checking the Buy it Now listings every so often (regular auctions always seem to end up fairly close to retail price, whereas with Buy it Now you can sometimes catch someone who doesn't know any better putting one up pretty cheap). If you find something for a good price, make sure the seller has a good feedback rating, read through the description a couple times to make sure you know what you're getting, and don't hesitate to ask the seller questions. Making a major purchase over ebay can be a bit scary for some people, but as long as you take all the proper steps, you should be ok. I'm not a fan of eBay, and greatly prefer not owning preowned things, but for picking up a ps3 and some games I ended up going this route which resulted in purchasing a 60gb version ($260 after shipping). I've seen ~10 of the 60gb in the last two weeks go for $250-300 and some had games, controllers, or HDMI cables with them. I was going to pick up a new retail one a while back but then figured I'd just get a 60gb one and get a 2yr SquareTrade warranty for $50 I think it was, and in the worst case scenario I end up with a brand new ps3 for a cheaper price. Sure I'd prefer a slim body type, but considering what I got at the prices I did ($130 for Demon Souls, SF4 + Akuma Controller, Uncharted, and Valk Chronicles) in close to new or brand new I'm very happy with the purchases off ebay. But the most important thing, to agree with Velo, watch the feedback ratings, ask questions, and be patient. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on June 04, 2009, 07:54:22 PM So no price cut announced at E3. I still want to play Demon's Souls when the Atlus US release is available. Buy now with the Dell 15% off + free shipping coupon or continue holding for a price cut? You could always keep an eye on ebay. Got my PS3 there for $250 in perfect condition. I'd recommend checking the Buy it Now listings every so often (regular auctions always seem to end up fairly close to retail price, whereas with Buy it Now you can sometimes catch someone who doesn't know any better putting one up pretty cheap). If you find something for a good price, make sure the seller has a good feedback rating, read through the description a couple times to make sure you know what you're getting, and don't hesitate to ask the seller questions. Making a major purchase over ebay can be a bit scary for some people, but as long as you take all the proper steps, you should be ok. I'm not a fan of eBay, and greatly prefer not owning preowned things, but for picking up a ps3 and some games I ended up going this route which resulted in purchasing a 60gb version ($260 after shipping). I've seen ~10 of the 60gb in the last two weeks go for $250-300 and some had games, controllers, or HDMI cables with them. I was going to pick up a new retail one a while back but then figured I'd just get a 60gb one and get a 2yr SquareTrade warranty for $50 I think it was, and in the worst case scenario I end up with a brand new ps3 for a cheaper price. Sure I'd prefer a slim body type, but considering what I got at the prices I did ($130 for Demon Souls, SF4 + Akuma Controller, Uncharted, and Valk Chronicles) in close to new or brand new I'm very happy with the purchases off ebay. But the most important thing, to agree with Velo, watch the feedback ratings, ask questions, and be patient. Just won an 80GB PS3 with BC off Ebay for $260. Now to hope the rest goes right. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 04, 2009, 07:56:07 PM 80GB PS3 is software back compat. There's a list somewhere with issues.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 04, 2009, 08:19:35 PM Yay for a cool wife!
Got a PS3 tonight (and a Samsung 32" 1080p LCD TV). Unfortunately, not the one I was telling you about, schild. Already sold; wasn't paying attention to the post date for the ad on craigslist. But nevertheless, stoked. Anyway, came with Uncharted, bought Infamous and MGS4 to go along with it. They (best buy) didn't have Demon Souls. Fuckers. Got it home. Unpacked everything. Forgot an HDMI cable. Doh. This question probably belongs in the Quick Tech Question thread, but can two wireless devices operate off the same Linksys WRT54GS router? I've got it set to WPA2whatever security thing for wireless devices. When I went to enter in the WPA Shared Key on the PS3 network set up, it promptly booted my wife offline on her laptop, telling her another device with the same IP has logged on (or something similar). So, I'm guessing the answer is "no"? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on June 04, 2009, 08:24:31 PM 80GB PS3 is software back compat. There's a list somewhere with issues. Heres hoping its an HE (http://playstation.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/playstation.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=232&p_sid=XpJjnzzj), oh and the search linky (http://www.us.playstation.com/Support/CompatibleStatus) schild's talking about. Uncharted, bought Infamous and MGS4 to go along with it. They (best buy) didn't have Demon Souls. Demon Souls is only an import at the moment, NA release is coming up sometime.Quote And the USB wired controller is going to have to go. It's only needed for charging ;)Quote This question probably belongs in the Quick Tech Question thread, but can two wireless devices operate off the same Linksys WRT54GS router? I've got it set to WPA2whatever security thing for wireless devices. When I went to enter in the WPA Shared Key on the PS3 network set up, it promptly booted my wife offline on her laptop, telling her another device with the same IP has logged on (or something similar). So, I'm guessing the answer is "no"? Yes its no problem to operate two or more devices off of the wireless access point. Did you copy the same IP as your wifes? If so just increment the IP or use DHCP on the router to handling passing IP's out by itself. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 04, 2009, 08:29:58 PM Yes its no problem to operate two or more devices off of the wireless access point. Did you copy the same IP as your wifes? If so just increment the IP or use DHCP on the router to handling passing IP's out by itself. Thanks for the other info. Now, I'm going to be real honest here. I have NO idea what you just said. So, I'm going to answer yes to 'copy the same IP', and 'saywhodawhat?' to the rest. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on June 04, 2009, 08:41:04 PM nothing really
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on June 04, 2009, 08:57:33 PM 80GB PS3 is software back compat. There's a list somewhere with issues. Yeah, I know. Figured it wasn't a big deal, as I recently bought a used PS2 (we use my roommates as mine is a first gen and is quite temperamental) for the girlfriend to use at school, and she'll be completely done soon. Probably will pick up Uncharted and Disgaea 3 as a kick off, and BlazBlue and KOF next month will now be purchased on this instead of 360. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Koyasha on June 04, 2009, 09:49:46 PM 80GB PS3 is software back compat. There's a list somewhere with issues. According to Wikipedia (assuming that chart is correct) the 80GB model in production now has no backwards compatiblity whatsoever. Only the older 80GB model that is now no longer in production has the software compatibility.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 04, 2009, 11:01:04 PM 80GB PS3 is software back compat. There's a list somewhere with issues. According to Wikipedia (assuming that chart is correct) the 80GB model in production now has no backwards compatiblity whatsoever. Only the older 80GB model that is now no longer in production has the software compatibility.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on June 05, 2009, 07:50:58 AM How long does it take the wireless controller to charge, and does it charge with the system off? A few hours to charge to 100%, and the PS3's USB ports are not powered when the system is off. Old Motorola cellphone chargers (Mini-USB) work great, though. As for backcompat, the easiest way to check is to count the USB ports on the front of your PS3. If there's 4, you have software BC. If there's only 2, you don't. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ard on June 05, 2009, 11:06:35 AM 80GB PS3 is software back compat. There's a list somewhere with issues. You can check for specific games here: http://www.us.playstation.com/Support/CompatibleStatus (http://www.us.playstation.com/Support/CompatibleStatus) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tale on June 05, 2009, 05:46:52 PM If I owned a PS3 and not an XBox 360 (never owned either of them yet), would it still feel like I was missing some of the best games? For a long time as a neutral observer, the 360 seemed like where the best games were. The 360's red ring problems and nickel-and-diming always put me off, as did the PS3's upfront cost, but I might pick one now.
I'm primarily a PC gamer. I already have a Sony Blu-Ray player (came with my Sony HDTV), a Wii and balance board (because I'm fascinated by input device technologies), and a long-dead Xbox 1 (Christmas tree lights problem). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on June 05, 2009, 07:28:46 PM You'd be missing out on Gears of War 2, Fable 2, some Halo games, and that's about it. Even Alan Wake is supposed to get a release on Vista.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 05, 2009, 07:44:38 PM Is there any word on PC launches for Fable 2 and Gears 2? Both those games' first editions were released on PC 9-12 months after xbox.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 05, 2009, 08:26:07 PM Is there any word on PC launches for Fable 2 and Gears 2? Both those games' first editions were released on PC 9-12 months after xbox. They'll be announced eventually. I really can't recommend Fable 2 to anybody though. That thing is a joke.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Dion on June 06, 2009, 02:49:19 PM Is there any word on PC launches for Fable 2 and Gears 2? Both those games' first editions were released on PC 9-12 months after xbox. They'll be announced eventually. I really can't recommend Fable 2 to anybody though. That thing is a joke.I don't think GoW2 will get on PC, Cliffy B raged about piracy with the first game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 06, 2009, 11:12:30 PM Finally got the PS3 hooked up tonight with an HDMI. Getting lots of blue static pops. The fuck?
Any ideas? First inclination is a bad HDMI cable. Edit: Also, freezes up 17 percent in to updating Drakes Fortune. Awesome. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 06, 2009, 11:19:46 PM Oh, Craigslist. How doth never disappoint. :(
Try formatting the whole damn thing or something. If you haven't, you should've anyway. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: SnakeCharmer on June 07, 2009, 12:03:01 AM Bought it new.
Fixed the connection/download issue. Moved it to another TV. Worked flawlessly. So either I'm getting some bad interference in my office or the TV is bad. Going to pull the TV out of the office and set it up temporarily somewhere else and see what happens. FWIW, my router is sitting 4 feet away from the TV that's acting up. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 07, 2009, 12:05:00 AM I get green noise on some screens on my Vizio if it helps you feel better. But mine is ooooooooooooooold. I could probably fix it, but I'm lazy and it doesn't effect gaming.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 08, 2009, 09:08:49 PM My purchase might be getting bumped up to mid-July. From there I only need to see if we'll get a price drop or slimline announcement.
The PS2 game thread got me thinking. What are the must-haves for the PS3? I'm going to pick up InFamous because it looks cool, along with Uncharted. I'll snag Demons Souls when it goes American. What else? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on June 08, 2009, 09:30:30 PM Depending on your game type/genre preferences:
Resistance 1/2 MotoStorm 1/2 Metal Gear Solid Little Big Planet If you don't have a 360 and are after more than platform exclusives: Saints Row 2 Guitar Hero WT/Rock Band 2 Lego Star Wars Hard to go much more into depth without knowing what genres you like. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on June 08, 2009, 11:18:39 PM Ratchet & Clank. Yes, I love this series and I'm not insane.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on June 08, 2009, 11:35:45 PM lol, almost every exclusive is pretty fun to me, barring the downloadables. heavy on the action side, but they're all pretty good. just depends on whether you like their respective atmosphere or not. top games for me are uncharted, lbp, and maybe now that i think about it, valkyria.
I'd say download Wipeout HD at least. There's a new Wipeout in the works, but Wipeout HD's pretty cheap. umm.. the Last Guy is pretty cool too. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on June 09, 2009, 12:07:50 AM My purchase might be getting bumped up to mid-July. From there I only need to see if we'll get a price drop or slimline announcement. The PS2 game thread got me thinking. What are the must-haves for the PS3? I'm going to pick up InFamous because it looks cool, along with Uncharted. I'll snag Demons Souls when it goes American. What else? MGS4 Disgaea 3 (If you're into srpgs) Valkyria Chronicles I did not like LBP, but a lot have. The jumping physics drove me crazy. Other genres like shooters and racers, I'm just not that into. Multi-platform console you can figure out for yourself. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 09, 2009, 05:32:36 AM Ratchet & Clank. Yes, I love this series and I'm not insane. I enjoyed the first two on PS2 very much. When they made the design shift for the third/Deadlocked I felt it lost something. How do the new ones hold up in comparison? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on June 09, 2009, 08:35:34 AM Ratchet & Clank. Yes, I love this series and I'm not insane. I enjoyed the first two on PS2 very much. When they made the design shift for the third/Deadlocked I felt it lost something. How do the new ones hold up in comparison? I've been replaying the first one recently and it's got some definite charm, like the chatty Gadgetron vendor and the music. I do find that I miss some of the bits added to the later ones, though. The Future portion of the series continues the development of the line towards relatively story-heavy play while keeping Deadlock's refined (?) combat. I'm not in love with most of the weapons in the Future games, unfortunately, but the platforming and combat is great. It's still funny, too. Personally I feel that Quest for Booty is even stronger than Tools of Destruction, which is good because the generation-leap problem was very obvious in ToD. QfB has some great puzzles and atmosphere. QfB is also damn funny. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on June 09, 2009, 03:37:42 PM For anyone else in Canada. Dell Canada (http://accessories.dell.com/sna/products/Games_Entertainment/productdetail.aspx?c=ca&l=en&s=dhs&cs=cadhs1&sku=A1518790&dgc=AF&cid=3881&lid=77903) has the Logitech cordless Mediaboard Pro PS3 (http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/gaming/playstation_3/devices/3616&cl=US,EN) on for $39.99 +tax (shipping is free).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on June 09, 2009, 04:21:28 PM How is the wireless keypad compared to the keyboard? If it is a decent accessory I'd much rather have the keypad over a keyboard.
Also, I hear about 3.5" HDD tray adapters so I could use regular desktop HDD instead of the more expensive 2.5" HDD, has anyone tried one they'd recommend? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hoax on June 09, 2009, 08:58:07 PM If I owned a PS3 and not an XBox 360 (never owned either of them yet), would it still feel like I was missing some of the best games? For a long time as a neutral observer, the 360 seemed like where the best games were. The 360's red ring problems and nickel-and-diming always put me off, as did the PS3's upfront cost, but I might pick one now. I'm primarily a PC gamer. I already have a Sony Blu-Ray player (came with my Sony HDTV), a Wii and balance board (because I'm fascinated by input device technologies), and a long-dead Xbox 1 (Christmas tree lights problem). If you've gone this long unless you want to play RPG's, 2d fighters or racing games I'm not sure what the point is. You have BR which means you can't justify it as a player and as a pc gamer I would expect you to not need shooters. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 11, 2009, 04:39:58 AM http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001FRTP94?ie=UTF8&tag=f13-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001FRTP94
PS3 is the deal of the day (80GB @ $350). There's 3 editions on the page, click the one that just says 80GB. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 11, 2009, 06:25:44 AM Dammit I don't quite have the cash for it. Thanks for the link though.
I wonder if this means they're clearing them out for a new bundle like Target and Walmart are getting. Or clearing for an announcement. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on June 12, 2009, 07:37:13 AM The PS3 I purchased off Ebay, pulled out the hard drive, popped in a 500GB (it's what I had lying around), hooked it up, and went to the races. Watched a bit of Casino Royale on Blu-Ray (pretty!), played some Uncharted (pretty and fun!), and downloaded some stuff from the Playstatino Store.
I think I prefer the Xbox Live Marketplace overall, but I dig spending real money instead of fucking around with Microsoft points. Plus my girlfriend just about died being able to get FF7 on her PSP. Only thing I'm not feeling is demo installation. I downloaded something, and I can't do much with it without an install, so why doesn't it just do it automatically? I'm assuming that while Microsofts demos and such are straight executables, the PSN stuff is archived in some fashion? It just seems like a weird extra step. After Uncharted, I'm probably going after Infamous next. BlazBlue/KOF will probably be for 360, since I already picked up the FightPad for SF4, and there can't be that much difference between the two revs. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on June 12, 2009, 08:43:50 AM Only thing I'm not feeling is demo installation. I downloaded something, and I can't do much with it without an install, so why doesn't it just do it automatically? I'm assuming that while Microsofts demos and such are straight executables, the PSN stuff is archived in some fashion? It just seems like a weird extra step. I agree, this bothers me a tiny bit, but really the fact that I can use actual money instead of abstract points really takes care of most of my gripes. Also I can't seem to remove an expired credit card from my XBLive config, which is something I have to pay attention to every time I add points, so PSN++. Buying things on PSN is so easy that I have to remember to SLOW DOWN and see if that LBP costume is also part of a bundle which might save me a dollar or two. I also like the Add To Cart bit for when I'm buying a lot of little things. I really wish that I had had the patience or foresight at the time to replace my PS3 disk immediately. Good job. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Oz on June 12, 2009, 11:58:38 AM i found a way to avoid the double install hassle of the PSN. que everything you want to download from store late at night. then go to far right and choose "shut down" and check the little box for it to shut down after it installs. go to bed.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on June 12, 2009, 12:05:39 PM Neat.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on June 14, 2009, 04:47:25 AM Is there a way/workaround so that you can use PS2 controllers on the PS3?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on June 14, 2009, 02:13:24 PM Is there a way/workaround so that you can use PS2 controllers on the PS3? No sir. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hoax on June 14, 2009, 10:44:13 PM Apparently there is no way to get the ps3 controllers to work w/ vista64 or any 3rd party controllers that suck less. I'm looking at you L2 and R2 you fuckers.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 19, 2009, 06:37:54 PM Expect a price drop in 31 days because I just got mine today! What a smooth system. Makes my little Wii look so lonely next to it.
My 4yr old immediately took to the controller, had her little Sackboy jumping all around and changing it's colors. That's something she simply couldn't do on the Wii. The Wii controller setup isn't intuitive enough. Picked up: LBP Ratchet and Clank: Tools of something or other Oblivion (because it crashed all the time on my PC) InFamous SW: Force Unleashed Really stoked. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on June 19, 2009, 07:50:08 PM Expect a price drop in 31 days because I just got mine today! That would make Activision happy since they threatened to pull PS3 support if there isn't a price drop soon. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tale on June 19, 2009, 09:27:52 PM If I owned a PS3 and not an XBox 360 (never owned either of them yet), would it still feel like I was missing some of the best games? For a long time as a neutral observer, the 360 seemed like where the best games were. The 360's red ring problems and nickel-and-diming always put me off, as did the PS3's upfront cost, but I might pick one now. I'm primarily a PC gamer. I already have a Sony Blu-Ray player (came with my Sony HDTV), a Wii and balance board (because I'm fascinated by input device technologies), and a long-dead Xbox 1 (Christmas tree lights problem). If you've gone this long unless you want to play RPG's, 2d fighters or racing games I'm not sure what the point is. You have BR which means you can't justify it as a player and as a pc gamer I would expect you to not need shooters. I think you're right. I just have to be patient for PC release dates and ultimately I can play everything with what I've already got. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 19, 2009, 09:39:54 PM Expect a price drop in 31 days because I just got mine today! That would make Activision happy since they threatened to pull PS3 support if there isn't a price drop soon.Not that it matters, their products are on par with EA's bad days now. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on June 20, 2009, 01:56:00 AM Expect a price drop in 31 days because I just got mine today! That would make Activision happy since they threatened to pull PS3 support if there isn't a price drop soon.Not that it matters, their products are on par with EA's bad days now. Of course they do have what's probably the biggest selling non-Nintendo franchise of this gen. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on June 20, 2009, 02:51:45 AM hm... what's the PS3 selling for in the US? $400?
If they sold it here in Aust for that equivalent, it'd be under (or about) AU$490-$500 and I'd be much more likely to buy one. Instead they insist on keeping the RRP sky-high at AU$690-700. Or in your money, that's US$570. So I continue to not own a PS3. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: naum on June 22, 2009, 08:09:54 AM Activision’s Kotick: ‘We May Not Make Games For The PS3 Next Year’ (http://paidcontent.org/article/419-activisions-kotick-we-may-not-make-games-for-the-ps3-next-year-)
Quote “It’s expensive to develop for the console, and the Wii and the Xbox are just selling better,” Kotick told the Times Online. “Games generate a better return on invested capital on the Xbox than on the PlayStation.” Publishers typically plan game release schedules roughly one to two years in advance—and Kotick said Activision was thinking hard about whether to release games for the PS3 and the handheld PSP in 2010 and 2011. That would mean no future iterations of the best-selling Guitar Hero or Call of Duty franchises for PS3 owners—which could spark a downward spiral of even fewer console sales for Sony. (As for other publishers following suit, that could go either way. Rivals could choose to cut their losses, or spotlight the fact that they still put out PS3 games as a value proposition). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on June 22, 2009, 08:10:59 AM There's a thread about that asshat.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 22, 2009, 08:59:26 AM Yesterday I hooked up the PS3 to our 42" Sony LCD we bought earlier this year and moved the old janky DVD player upstairs for kid use. We were halfway through the first season of Lost on DVD on the old player and decide last night to watch a few more episodes. Holy Cow!! The picture off the PS3/HDMI cabling is phenomenal.
Also, LBP is tons of fun. I see how people were off about the controls feeling a little loose, but the charm of the game makes up for it so far. Both the kid and my wife really had a good time. But you know the best part? I can download Spyro 1-3 (for PS1) from PSN for my wife. She's going to go crazy, those are her favorite games ever. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hayduke on June 22, 2009, 09:06:35 AM Amazon's doing Gold Box sales for PS3 today it looks like.
Gold Box (http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox) Nothing terribly interesting except CoD4 and what looks to be Fallout 3 though. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on June 22, 2009, 09:25:40 AM Amazon's doing Gold Box sales for PS3 today it looks like. Gold Box (http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox) Nothing terribly interesting except CoD4 and what looks to be Fallout 3 though. Looks like it will be HAWX, GH: Metallica and Fallout 3 on sale later today, after Wolverine and CoD4. From what I can gather from the clues. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hayduke on June 22, 2009, 09:28:02 AM The CoD4 deal is all day.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 05, 2009, 01:31:48 PM Yes yes yes its rumors about a PS3 slim but here's some interesting tidbits
Quote from: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/08/the-ps3-slim-is-coming-evidence-builds-for-updated-system.ars During a recent financial call, Sony also revealed that the cost to manufacture the console is way down. "The cost reduction since we introduced the PS3 is very substantial and this is on schedule,” Nobuyuki Oneda Sony Corp's CEO and Executive Vice President stated on the call, as reported by TotalVideoGames. While he declined to comment on specific numbers initially, he finally admitted the cost has dropped around 70 percent. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 05, 2009, 01:56:15 PM That's old.
I got a splitfish frag 2.0 in the mail today. Wondering what game I should try it with. Would try Modern Warfare but don't have it for the PS3. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Sky on August 05, 2009, 02:10:46 PM The government's been using PS3s in array, so that's gotta be helping with moving units and driving down cost of production.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 05, 2009, 02:12:54 PM The government's been using PS3s in array, so that's gotta be helping with moving units and driving down cost of production. Tons of places have been doing that - since release. I'm not sure why you'd think that would drive down the cost of production. I'd wager it really doesn't move that many units, not in the short term and especially not in the long term.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on August 05, 2009, 03:12:40 PM The government's been using PS3s in array, so that's gotta be helping with moving units and driving down cost of production. I think they'd rather be moving units to people who buy games. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on August 05, 2009, 07:16:49 PM Its nice to see they have gotten production down. Maybe its time to I dunno, pass this shit on to consumers so I can play the handful of games that were dipshit enough to be PS3 exclusives?
Price goes down meaning used 20 gig BC machines should go down. I then buy one, for a nice 200-250 and pop in a 100 gig HD for like 50 more bones eventually. (I cant believe how easy it is to replace the HD. I guess even SONY can do something right eventually..) I can then play LBP, Disgaea 3, and Operation Darkness with maids instead of characters dressed like they might actually be in mid 20th century Europe. And possibly that Demon Soul game everyone here spooges over. You would figure the cornholding Nintendo's cheaper products have given them might have gotten through their thick skulls by now. They finally made a system that doesn't break if you look at it funny, but then they screw the pooch on price. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 05, 2009, 07:18:37 PM Operation Darkness is a 360 exclusive.
Little Big Planet is owned by Sony. NISA and SCEI are like brothers. They've always approved of their work where they wouldn't approve others. After the success of Disgaea, they had to, and it was a smart move. The price on 20GB won't go down unless BC comes back. You talk tough for someone who says absolutely ridiculous shit. You should stop that. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 05, 2009, 07:32:05 PM I got a splitfish frag 2.0 in the mail today. Please to be seeing a review asap. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 05, 2009, 09:24:43 PM I got a splitfish frag 2.0 in the mail today. Please to be seeing a review asap. If it were a Razer mouse type short throw set of buttons, I'd recommend it to anyone - at least for Resistance 1 which is what I tested it with. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on August 05, 2009, 11:16:24 PM When aiming with the SplitFish mouse does it feel as responsive as aiming on the PC?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 05, 2009, 11:41:34 PM When aiming with the SplitFish mouse does it feel as responsive as aiming on the PC? No, it feels as responsive as a console. Except my accuracy is much much better, I don't ZOOM close to a head and inch to it with an analog stick, instead I zoom right to the head. If that makes sense. Mouse still sucks an egg.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 06, 2009, 12:27:55 AM Mouse still sucks an egg. Curious is it more of a spring issue, plastic molding or just a piece of shit? I don't understand why they just don't put a USB type a socket + 5 button hid device support in its firmware and keep the price the same. Do some "works best" with xyz vendor who knows their shit on mouse building but have it all tinker able/profiles for major mice in its desktop app. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 06, 2009, 12:31:25 AM Because the mouse has the standard PS3 buttons on it + start. So, X, Y, O, etc. It's hard to explain how bad it is, seriously. I can't find the words, except "bad."
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on August 06, 2009, 06:32:32 AM I just bought a FragFX v2 last week as well, and all of the buttons (both on the mouse and the nunchuck part) are super cheap feeling: squishy, with lots of play and wiggling around and absolutely none of the positive feedback that you get from even the cheapest PC mouse. I think it's a product of making each button an analog input instead of a purely digital one (you can check this using their comically bad programming & customization software). The mouse is also a tad small for my liking.
That said, it beats the piss out of thumbstick aiming. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 06, 2009, 08:25:15 AM Yeah, I'm still getting one. Hopefully they may change the manufacturing by my birthday.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on August 06, 2009, 01:01:02 PM Operation Darkness is a 360 exclusive. Learn to read. I was referring to Valkryia Chronicles. Since its sort of the same game as Operation Darkness, only more Otaku. Since the cast of OD don't dress like maids and shit and almost look like they may actually be in a WW2 combat zone. Just one with zombies, vampires, and werewolves in it. (Man, throwing a grenade at a zombie horde just doesn't get old.) And I could really give a shit about game company politics. Its always been stupid and it always will be. Nintendo started this crap back in the 80s (or at least perfected it) and its really never ended since. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hayduke on August 06, 2009, 01:50:30 PM That's some powerful stupid.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on August 06, 2009, 01:55:16 PM Operation Darkness is a 360 exclusive. Learn to read. I was referring to Valkryia Chronicles. Since its sort of the same game as Operation Darkness, only more Otaku. Since the cast of OD don't dress like maids and shit and almost look like they may actually be in a WW2 combat zone. Just one with zombies, vampires, and werewolves in it. (Man, throwing a grenade at a zombie horde just doesn't get old.) And I could really give a shit about game company politics. Its always been stupid and it always will be. Nintendo started this crap back in the 80s (or at least perfected it) and its really never ended since. :facepalm: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on August 06, 2009, 02:08:33 PM Operation Darkness is maggot-infested shit next to Valkyria Chronicles.
If you don't give a shit about company politics, why are you acting childish over Sony's? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 06, 2009, 02:09:44 PM Because he's a cheap, deluded, stupid asshole.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on August 06, 2009, 02:24:12 PM Operation Darkness is maggot-infested shit next to Valkyria Chronicles. It's maggot-infested shit even before you start comparing it to Valkyria Chronicles. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on August 06, 2009, 09:54:04 PM Its funny I am having fun with it, but oh well.
Schild you don't like Dragon Quest so clearly your opinion of games is like, totally wrong. So suck mah balls. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on August 07, 2009, 08:39:57 AM Zombies, vampires, werewolves <> WWII <> watercolor people in a fake europish nation
Someone help me with the math, I'm not sure it's valid. Maybe I should just play the game since it's fun. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Murgos on August 07, 2009, 08:44:21 AM I don't know about the full game but the Demo for Operation Darkness was putrid feces.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on August 07, 2009, 08:47:45 AM I would have made more sense if I had specified Valkyria Chronicles.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 12, 2009, 07:27:06 AM Silly question, I was cleaning up some data last night (old saved game data from trials) and decided to run the system updater. It re pulled/reinstalled 2.80. This ever happen to anyone else that you reinstall a system firmware previously installed?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on August 12, 2009, 05:10:22 PM Not I.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on August 16, 2009, 09:25:41 PM I have enough to buy a mid-priced game tomorrow. I've played quite a few through demos and such and I'm down to two. Which? I can't decide.
Uncharted (now that it's $30) Valkyria Chronicles I've got lots of 'actiony' games already, but don't have any RPGs, of which VC is supposed to be decent. Then again, Uncharted is supposed to rock. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on August 16, 2009, 10:24:56 PM Valkyria Chronicles is more of a sRPG. You don't go a questin'.
Both are worth the money. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on August 17, 2009, 12:12:33 AM Hard choice, though I'd probably lean towards Valkyria Chronicles if only because the best Sega RPG's have a bad habit of becoming near impossible to find. Skies of Arcadia is one example.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 17, 2009, 04:28:17 PM Didn't want to start a new thread but Little Big Planet GOTY (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/08/17/announcing-littlebigplanet-%E2%80%93-game-of-the-year-edition/) edition announced, Modnation racers beta invite in the box.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on August 17, 2009, 04:29:10 PM It's a trap!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 17, 2009, 04:30:06 PM Son of a bitch. I want that beta.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on August 17, 2009, 04:50:36 PM Didn't want to start a new thread but Little Big Planet GOTY (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/08/17/announcing-littlebigplanet-%E2%80%93-game-of-the-year-edition/) edition announced, Modnation racers beta invite in the box. Well, I did want to pick LBP up at some point. Guess that would be a good excuse. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Margalis on August 17, 2009, 05:09:15 PM I wonder what the long-term effect of double-dipping in the VG industry will be? From a consumer standpoint any game that relies heavily on DLC looks to be a much better bargain if you just wait, and unlike movies games don't cost 19.99.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 17, 2009, 05:12:07 PM I wonder what the long-term effect of double-dipping in the VG industry will be? From a consumer standpoint any game that relies heavily on DLC looks to be a much better bargain if you just wait, and unlike movies games don't cost 19.99. I can tell you I had no interest in purchasing Fallout3 till their GOTY was announced with all the content. Question is hows the PS3 port of it play? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 17, 2009, 05:14:36 PM Having played it on the 360 and PC, I can assure you that it doesn't matter how it plays, you should get it on the PC.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Margalis on August 17, 2009, 05:19:46 PM Fallout 3 was exactly what I was thinking of specifically.
Although I guess the comparison to movies is flawed in that you can't buy things like commentary as DLC for a DVD. When DVDs double dip typically the later editions offer things you couldn't get anywhere else, whereas games offer things you could already get just as a more attractive bundle. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on August 17, 2009, 05:27:40 PM Games with paid DLC generally tend to come in cheaper when the bundled versions are released.
I don't see a problem with this. It's essentially the same thing many games with expansions already do. Offer a "gold" or "platinum" version with all of the expansions included. Grabs people on the fence, bargain seekers and others. It's not going anywhere as a strategy. Some games have hurt their potential for not going this route. People that want the game and don't care about saving $30 dollars a year down the road will still buy it at release. Future DLC isn't going to affect my purchases one bit. Of course, I've tended to ignore DLC for the most part as I rarely think it's worth the purchase. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on August 17, 2009, 06:01:29 PM I wonder what the long-term effect of double-dipping in the VG industry will be? From a consumer standpoint any game that relies heavily on DLC looks to be a much better bargain if you just wait, and unlike movies games don't cost 19.99. Any game, DLC or not is a better bargain if you wait. GOTY editions don't generally save you much, if any additional money over buying the base game (which will be heavily discounted at that point) plus all the DLC included in the GOTY version. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on August 18, 2009, 04:33:53 AM Any game, DLC or not is a better bargain if you wait. This for sure ^^ I've just ordered 3 games for £40, much nicer than 1 for £40 :awesome_for_real: You just have to wait 3-6 months. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on August 18, 2009, 05:55:53 AM Essentially you pay the premium for the content sooner than others, even DLC works this way. The big problem I see for companies is when they start releasing a relaunch pack and not adding some of it to DLC for their customers who paid the premium, like LA is doing with SW:Unleashed repack. That gets under my skin because I already paid and it definitely makes me want to wait on their games in the future. That could have some impact on future launch sales, maybe.
Don't punish me for paying you more money, earlier. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on August 18, 2009, 07:32:22 AM PS3 Slim $299 at Kmart! (http://www.kmart.com/shc/s/p_10151_10104_018W014436760001P?adCell=W2)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 18, 2009, 07:39:03 AM Nice.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 09:38:38 AM Wierd PSN is offline for two hours during the conference too.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 10:39:52 AM PS3 Slim $299 at Kmart! (http://www.kmart.com/shc/s/p_10151_10104_018W014436760001P?adCell=W2) That pretty much takes the piss outta the press conference, as if everything else didn't before.Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 10:48:04 AM AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND HERE WE GO
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 10:54:39 AM I haven't posted yet because nothing notable has happened. They're doing their normal song and dance about numbers.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 10:57:17 AM I am very interested to learn if GAMESCOM deserves a thread hijack.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 10:58:25 AM It's a 2 hour press conference and Microsoft and Nintendo have exactly nothing in SonyLa,, errrrrr Europe. Yea, it'll probably be "important." It'd be a lot more important if someone had lugged a fucking video camera there.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 11:06:07 AM http://blog.eu.playstation.com/2009/08/18/live-from-gamescom-scee-press-conference/
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 11:06:49 AM Yea, without a live feed, I'm already bored. E3 ruined me. Don't even have the strength for cap lock.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 11:08:10 AM Digital comics?!?!
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stu on August 18, 2009, 11:10:17 AM laem
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tige on August 18, 2009, 11:11:07 AM Didn't want to start a new thread but Little Big Planet GOTY (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/08/17/announcing-littlebigplanet-%E2%80%93-game-of-the-year-edition/) edition announced, Modnation racers beta invite in the box. I wish they would have LBP sackboys as the characters instead of trying duplicate them in modnation. So far the press conference is underwhelming. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 11:11:36 AM The most shocking thing about this press conference thus far, and I have 3 different live blogs open, all using Cover It Live, is how slow of a typer Crecente is - we're talking dog slow. Jem Alexander at SCEE however is a maelstrom of words.
Quote I wish they would have LBP sackboys as the characters instead of trying duplicate them in modnation. I disagree with what you said. Modnation racers is aping a few select designer toy styles with incredible precision. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 11:12:31 AM Bah. I'm going to have to wait for the summary before I return to proclaim "N U T ' S I N Y O U R M O U T H" or not.
Unless we want to start taking shots at Crescente. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 11:13:37 AM "The Digital Reader isn't just comics, though -- more on that at a later date."
Pondering with the ebook reader stuff as of late you will be able to sync etc Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 11:13:44 AM PSP Apps are called Minis. Instead of you know, "Games." In 15 seconds, we'll know if they have balls to make indie games.
Wait, make that 0 seconds, and no. Still going to be licensed shit. Not taking on the iPhone this round! Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 11:14:13 AM Fuckit, I'm showering, text isn't fun. I'll get myself filled in on this news later.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 11:33:49 AM Slim PS3 is official first week of sept $299, all the same features. Pricedrop on existing ps3 hardware today.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: rattran on August 18, 2009, 11:41:47 AM No mention of BC that I saw. And I wonder if the slim will have as easily replaced a drive as the regular ps3.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Murgos on August 18, 2009, 11:43:24 AM Whoa, the PS3 in the US is 1/3rd the price it is in Europe and slightly less even than in Japan?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 11:45:40 AM No mention of BC that I saw. Nope "same features" was the wording so no BC. Not like you could of really expected it as its been totally ripped out now for a while of the PS3. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: NiX on August 18, 2009, 11:50:28 AM Shitty that BC isn't making a comeback.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: funcro on August 18, 2009, 12:45:43 PM Does it look to anyone like the hard drive in the Slim is going to be easily user replaceable?
SCEI marketing materials as presented by Engadget. (http://www.engadget.com/photos/sonys-slimmer-ps3/2216344/) I have no experience with the existing PS3, and it's too dark to tell easily in that picture. If I can't upgrade the hard drive in the Slim, I'll get a price reduced Heavy (or whatever they end up being called) instead. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 12:52:20 PM Based on those photos, I'd say no. Or at least it won't be as easy.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: MisterNoisy on August 18, 2009, 12:52:26 PM I think the HDD access hatch has been relocated to the front of the machine (the little panel with all the logos to the right of the USB ports).
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 12:53:14 PM Yea, that is where it would have to be but my glass is half empty.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: AutomaticZen on August 18, 2009, 01:04:32 PM You lose the touch-panel buttons, seemingly the ability to switch out the hard drive, and a stand costs extra. But otherwise, it's about time Sony.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 01:06:42 PM Where's the pictures of the power brick?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stu on August 18, 2009, 01:07:53 PM Oooo. That Slim looks sharp. I hope the speculation about the hard drives being a pain isn't true.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 01:09:28 PM Where's the pictures of the power brick? Reference PS2 Slim power brick. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hawkbit on August 18, 2009, 01:15:02 PM Was anything mentioned about backwards compat for PS2?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 18, 2009, 01:15:24 PM Quote Spec sheet: * Product name: PlayStation 3 * Product code: CECH-2000A (Charcoal Black) * CPU: Cell Broadband Engine™ * GPU: RSX * Audio output: LPCM 7.1ch, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby TrueHD, DTS, DTS-HD, AAC. * Memory: 256MB XDR Main RAM, 256MB GDDR3 VRAM * Hard disk: 120GB 2.5" Serial ATA * USB 2.0 ports: 2 * Networking: Ethernet (10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T), IEEE 802.11 b/g, Bluetooth 2.0 (+EDR) * Controller: Wireless Controller (Bluetooth) x 1 * AV outputs: HDMI x 1, AV MULTI OUT x 1, Digital out (optical) x 1 * Resolutions: 1080p, 1080i, 720p, 480p, 480i (for PAL 576p, 576i) * BD / DVD / CD drive (read only): BD × 2 (BD-ROM), DVD × 8 (DVD-ROM), CD × 24 (CD-ROM) * Power: AC 220 – 240, 50/60Hz * Power consumption: Approx. 250W * External dimensions (excluding maximum projecting part): Approx. 290 × 65 × 290 mm (width × height × length) * Mass: Approx. 3.2kg * Included in box: PlayStation 3 system × 1, Wireless Controller (DUALSHOCK 3) × 1, AC power cord × 1, AV cable × 1, USB cable × 1 Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: AutomaticZen on August 18, 2009, 01:18:44 PM Was anything mentioned about backwards compat for PS2? No. And it's probably not coming back for awhile. Sony likes selling PS2s. It's was only in there to get you to buy a PS3 NOW! Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 01:24:04 PM It's was only in there to get you to buy a PS3 NOW! It worked! :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 01:27:08 PM Reference PS2 Slim power brick. :oh_i_see: Quote Power consumption: Approx. 250W No way its using a PS2 slim size power brick. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 18, 2009, 01:29:14 PM Yea, I was way off. I'm thinking it's external and XBOX sized.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 01:55:07 PM Yeah its going to be big, I'm curious about the lack of any obvious fan in the new slim. There's no air intake at the front or the sides/bottom either.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 18, 2009, 02:50:58 PM New Heavy Rain trailer (http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gc-09-heavy-rain/54362).
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yoru on August 18, 2009, 03:02:53 PM I'm hearing 299 euro for a EU PS3-Slim. Anyone know if these fuckers are region-locked?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hindenburg on August 18, 2009, 03:11:56 PM AV cables? Seriously?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 03:13:18 PM It's a 250W power supply, it could very well be internal.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 18, 2009, 03:15:27 PM Super Stardust team does top-down zombie shooter, Dead Nation for PSN. (http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3175639)
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 03:38:06 PM It's a 250W power supply, it could very well be internal. On second looks that might be right as there's a marking for AC on the back and the specs mention an AC cable but no brick etc. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hawkbit on August 18, 2009, 03:46:32 PM Was anything mentioned about backwards compat for PS2? No. And it's probably not coming back for awhile. Sony likes selling PS2s. It's was only in there to get you to buy a PS3 NOW! That's cool then. I just bought one a few months back. If the slims had BC I'd feel ripped off, but that's really the only issue. The extra $100 is w/e. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 18, 2009, 04:00:40 PM New Heavy Rain trailer (http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gc-09-heavy-rain/54362). Whoa. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 04:21:18 PM I refuse to click the Heavy Rain trailer. I know it's awesome, of course it's awesome but I must go in blind.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 04:31:31 PM Hard drive is in the front, still easily removed.
No power supply. Keke. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: funcro on August 18, 2009, 04:39:34 PM Hard drive is in the front, still easily removed. No power supply. Keke. Crap. Now choosing between the Slim and the price reduced Uncharted bundle is actually a difficult decision. I wanted an easy out. :why_so_serious: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 04:39:59 PM The obvious answer? Both. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: NiX on August 18, 2009, 04:49:29 PM No BC? Not that it would be a deal breaker if I were considering buying one.
FUUUUUUUUUUUU! This is terrible! If I get a paying position I'm fucked. Demon's Souls + Cheaper slimline PS3. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 05:12:34 PM Oh hai new trophies/profiles already on playstation.com
![]() Get your Portable ID! (http://www.us.playstation.com/PSN/SignUp) Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Margalis on August 18, 2009, 05:20:32 PM That zombie game looks almost identical to the Zombie Apocalypse game that Konami (?) just released. (I think it released already...)
$299 price is pretty much the best anyone could have hoped for on PS3. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 18, 2009, 05:26:05 PM What a pain in the ass to find:
Playstation Network -> Login -> My Profile -> Tiny Portable ID button ![]() (http://www.us.playstation.com/PSN/SignUp) Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Merusk on August 18, 2009, 05:59:31 PM No BC? Not that it would be a deal breaker if I were considering buying one. Do ANY of the PS3's have BC nowadays? I know it kept getting scaled back. Not that it matters as I still have a fully functional PS2. The slim will get me to buy a PS3, finally, around x-mas. Yeah its going to be big, I'm curious about the lack of any obvious fan in the new slim. There's no air intake at the front or the sides/bottom either. The C.net article (http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10312144-1.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1) I read mentioned they cut the power consumption in half using the new cell processors, so the fans can be smaller than on the current PS3's. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 18, 2009, 07:02:51 PM Do ANY of the PS3's have BC nowadays? I know it kept getting scaled back. Not that it matters as I still have a fully functional PS2. The slim will get me to buy a PS3, finally, around x-mas. None have PS2 BC. Last shipping confirmed units were the MGS bundle which was last fall. Yeah its going to be big, I'm curious about the lack of any obvious fan in the new slim. There's no air intake at the front or the sides/bottom either. The C.net article (http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10312144-1.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1) I read mentioned they cut the power consumption in half using the new cell processors, so the fans can be smaller than on the current PS3's. Still theres a ton of venting on my current PS3-badonkadonk. Really amazed at how little obvious cooling it requires. Must be heatpipes taking it all to the back but wtf is the cold air intake. I cannot wait till someone rips it apart to see the layout inside. Think the lower cost of the units now drives up demands for someone to break the PS3 copyright protection? I'm really shocked at how long the PS3 has stayed un-modded. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ahoythematey on August 18, 2009, 07:18:57 PM I guess PSN is being hammered, I can't access my Tiny ID.
I have to admit that the slim is looking awfully sexy, and I'm damn near tempted to grab it and save my launch system for PS2 chicanery. Maybe when the price is reduced further... Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hawkbit on August 18, 2009, 07:31:27 PM Wish the portable IDs were about 1/4 of the height so I could put it in my sig. Not putting that monster in there as is though. Avoiding the ire of the mods.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: John Difool on August 18, 2009, 09:09:03 PM It will be interesting to see what kind of bump this gives to their sales. I'm personally in no hurry to ditch my 20gb (upgraded hdd to 160gb) machine as I actually use the BC frequently.
Let's see what that trophy card thing looks like ![]() Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ahoythematey on August 18, 2009, 09:29:44 PM ![]() Suddenly, I'm feeling inadequate. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Fabricated on August 18, 2009, 09:35:18 PM I like the PS3 Slim design, a lot. A lot less ridiculously monolithic than the old style. I do however enjoy my ol' 60GB and its hardware back compatibility.
I feel like I should replay Uncharted again suddenly. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 18, 2009, 11:08:06 PM Do ANY of the PS3's have BC nowadays? I know it kept getting scaled back. Not that it matters as I still have a fully functional PS2. The slim will get me to buy a PS3, finally, around x-mas. The reason it matters for people like me is because I'd like slightly less clutter in my home entertainment area, but more significantly, because upscaling actually makes a I'll continue to wait and see. The Australian Price will, I'm sure, continue to be horrifying. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Trippy on August 18, 2009, 11:46:57 PM Wish the portable IDs were about 1/4 of the height so I could put it in my sig. Not putting that monster in there as is though. Avoiding the ire of the mods. Wise decision :awesome_for_real:Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: apocrypha on August 18, 2009, 11:54:32 PM PSN EU doesn't seem to have the tiny ones :oh_i_see:
(http://mypsn.eu.playstation.com/psn/profile/Apocryphai.png) (http://eu.playstation.com/psn/profile/Apocryphai/) Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 19, 2009, 01:39:42 AM I'll continue to wait and see. The Australian Price will, I'm sure, continue to be horrifying. Got an email from EB just now. AU$499, Available from Sep 3rd. AU$499 = US$409 US$299 = AU$364 So we're only being shafted by about $100 this time. Yay. :why_so_serious: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ahoythematey on August 19, 2009, 01:42:29 AM I'm not saying it's in any way reasonable, but why not import from another region?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 19, 2009, 01:48:12 AM I'm not saying it's in any way reasonable, but why not import from another region? (http://www.alpha-duplication.com/pages/duplication/images/blu-ray-region-map.png) This is what is known as Australia getting treated like Africa. Which is to say "no one gave a shit when they decided to draw up blu-ray regions." Yes, that means - imo - Europe was fucked also. Japan and America and Hong Kong being the same region? PRICELESS. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: apocrypha on August 19, 2009, 02:35:48 AM Poor French Guiana as a tiny island of blue in the yellow mass :p
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 19, 2009, 02:48:37 AM Has anyone used an external HDD with a PS3 before? Maybe that's an option, if you want to expand with this one. ??? Either way, I'm sure the built in 120gb is enough, so long as you're not trying to make it a media center or something.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 19, 2009, 02:51:09 AM Anyone upset with the lack of certain release dates and such for PS3 stuff should really go look at the Microsoft thread.
I made a joke about Microsoft TOTALLY RUNNING OUT OF STEAM last year at some point. Whatwith companies like Ensemble shutting down and Big Huge Games just hitting the toilet and flushing itself and Bungie "switching teams" and the PGR people just leaving them behind. But honestly, I didn't think it'd be so bad that Molyneux wanks for 48 minutes and that's the whole presser. Quote Has anyone used an external HDD with a PS3 before? Maybe that's an option, if you want to expand with this one. Huh Either way, I'm sure the built in 120gb is enough, so long as you're not trying to make it a media center or something. The hard drive. Can. Be. Upgraded. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ahoythematey on August 19, 2009, 03:06:40 AM External HDD, yes, I've used one before for transferring music. As schild said, though, the internal can be upgraded. Easily.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 19, 2009, 03:10:56 AM Ah..
I'm still fine with 60gb surprisingly. I don't care to keep demos on there for long though. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ahoythematey on August 19, 2009, 03:16:05 AM Honestly, I don't anticipate needing to upgrade the hdd if you aren't looking to store a large amount of video on the machine. Even then, just plugging the usb cable from my external works fine, so I haven't bothered.
Having the option to do so without having my wallet raped is nice, though. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 19, 2009, 03:26:52 AM i'll start adding video to my machine when PSN home gives me a bravia, and streams it on there in mini version. :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 19, 2009, 03:48:59 AM I'm not saying it's in any way reasonable, but why not import from another region? This is what is known as Australia getting treated like Africa.Which is to say "no one gave a shit when they decided to draw up blu-ray regions." Yes, that means - imo - Europe was fucked also. Japan and America and Hong Kong being the same region? PRICELESS. Schild got it in one. If the PS3 had BC I'd buy one, or if we were the same Blu-Ray region as The US or HK, I'd import one from the US or HK. Games being R-free while movies are not is really an annoying move. As it stands, I could import one from the US/HK, but then it wouldn't run a lot of local discs. Yes I can import them, but sometimes it's just nice to go down to the local big-w or JB sale and buy a bunch of movie discs and not have to research if they'll work or not. Since DVD region locking became a bit of a joke here from the beginning (most brands), DVD imports were never a problem. Unless you got a Sony dvd player... Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yoru on August 19, 2009, 04:00:49 AM I'm not saying it's in any way reasonable, but why not import from another region? (http://www.alpha-duplication.com/pages/duplication/images/blu-ray-region-map.png) This is what is known as Australia getting treated like Africa. Which is to say "no one gave a shit when they decided to draw up blu-ray regions." Yes, that means - imo - Europe was fucked also. Japan and America and Hong Kong being the same region? PRICELESS. Is that region-locking for movies only, or games too? Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hindenburg on August 19, 2009, 06:48:59 AM Still theres a ton of venting on my current PS3-badonkadonk. Really amazed at how little obvious cooling it requires. Must be heatpipes taking it all to the back but wtf is the cold air intake. I cannot wait till someone rips it apart to see the layout inside. Have fun. (http://www.llamma.com/PS3/repair/PS3_disassembly_tutorial.htm) Dissipator's a bit of a monster. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 19, 2009, 09:38:35 AM Quote Is that region-locking for movies only, or games too? Only movies. I think there's like one EA game or some shit that's region locked. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Merusk on August 19, 2009, 04:46:41 PM It's a 250W power supply, it could very well be internal. On second looks that might be right as there's a marking for AC on the back and the specs mention an AC cable but no brick etc. No brick. http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-10109_7-10001399-1.html?s=1&o=10001398&tag=thum;nextThum Gallery of them unboxing a slim PS3. The last pic is the standard-looking PS cord vs the X-box power brick. Only composite cables in the box, but IIRC the PS3's have been doing that for a bit now as a cost-cutting measure. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 19, 2009, 04:49:35 PM No brick. http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-10109_7-10001399-1.html?s=1&o=10001398&tag=thum;nextThum Gallery of them unboxing a slim PS3. The last pic is the standard-looking PS cord vs the X-box power brick. Only composite cables in the box, but IIRC the PS3's have been doing that for a bit now as a cost-cutting measure. That's really impressive no external power supply :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tannhauser on August 19, 2009, 04:52:55 PM The last pic you linked to shows a brick.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 19, 2009, 04:54:09 PM Yea, the 360 power brick.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Merusk on August 19, 2009, 04:57:51 PM Reading captions is hard.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tannhauser on August 19, 2009, 06:13:49 PM In my defense your avatar is distracting.
Oh and LOL at the inevitable price drop. Maybe next generation Sony! Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tale on August 19, 2009, 06:41:21 PM That's really impressive no external power supply :awesome_for_real: External power supplies keep the heat away from the main box. Not having an external brick means the heat is inside the PS3. They must be confident that it's not much. Or more likely, the new hardware produces so little heat that it's safe to include the PSU heat. I think the Slim looks great and I plan to buy one. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hayduke on August 19, 2009, 11:20:37 PM Did the original fats have power bricks? Because the newer fats don't.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 19, 2009, 11:21:10 PM Did the original fats have power bricks? Because the newer fats don't. No.Oh and LOL at the inevitable price drop. Maybe next generation Sony! I don't understand this post. Maybe next-gen what? The PS3 is now $50 more than the Wii. Fifty. Dollars. Anyone who even buys a Wii from here on out is plum retarded - OR - doesn't have an HDTV. In which case, they're pretty much plum retarded, or broke and shouldn't be buying gaming systems. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 20, 2009, 01:23:11 AM Could be interesting when the cutthroat Christmas bundles and sales start up. No need to rush into the initial batch.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 20, 2009, 01:26:35 AM Could be interesting when the cutthroat Christmas bundles and sales start up. No need to rush into the initial batch. You only say that because you're in Australia. :awesome_for_real:Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 20, 2009, 06:27:36 AM I see a 360 in one of those pictures, so it must come with one of those as well.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Cyrrex on August 20, 2009, 07:25:12 AM I see a 360 in one of those pictures, so it must come with one of those as well. God damn stupid bundle bullshit. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 20, 2009, 03:52:46 PM People interested in picking up a Slim for the holiday season might want to think about pre-ordering soon (http://gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24932).
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 20, 2009, 04:07:50 PM People interested in picking up a Slim for the holiday season might want to think about pre-ordering soon (http://gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24932). Some places are offering sales on current 80gb ps3. Down to $269 CAD at staples :grin: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 20, 2009, 04:12:33 PM Could be interesting when the cutthroat Christmas bundles and sales start up. No need to rush into the initial batch. You only say that because you're in Australia. :awesome_for_real:Nah, I have a 360 remember, and with all but a few PS3 exclusives that I'm interested in being readily available to me already.. :awesome_for_real: Velorath - I'm sure if there's a local shortage here, they can just reroute some PS3s from Nigeria or Botswana. Or I'll wait till next christmas. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ghambit on August 20, 2009, 06:10:30 PM Any chance the original 80GB PS3 will be bundled (perhaps with Uncharted) for $300 somewhere?
I like the slim, but have no real need for 120GB and no bundle. And anyone here besides me who actually likes the styling on the old version better? edit: christ, BB is already pretty much sold out Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 20, 2009, 06:14:29 PM $299 was the magic price point Sony needed. It has been pretty obvious for a long time now they needed to get there, and well, they did. And that's that.
I'm really not sure what Microsoft's next move is as they don't have shit for exclusives coming out. Nintendo will just drop their price at TGS in response most likely. Or Space World. Or whatever the hell their event is. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 20, 2009, 08:31:40 PM Any chance the original 80GB PS3 will be bundled (perhaps with Uncharted) for $300 somewhere? I like the slim, but have no real need for 120GB and no bundle. And anyone here besides me who actually likes the styling on the old version better? edit: christ, BB is already pretty much sold out Yeah, I like the styling of the old ones, but smaller is definitely better. The network name for my PS3 has been Monolith from Day 1. :grin: That said, it's still the best PS3 (the 60 gig/BC). One of the few times I've splurged for gaming hardware, and not regretting it. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 20, 2009, 08:53:25 PM $299 was the magic price point Sony needed. It has been pretty obvious for a long time now they needed to get there, and well, they did. And that's that. I'm really not sure what Microsoft's next move is as they don't have shit for exclusives coming out. Nintendo will just drop their price at TGS in response most likely. Or Space World. Or whatever the hell their event is. MS's next move will likely be the Natal bundle sometime next year. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 20, 2009, 08:55:58 PM $299 was the magic price point Sony needed. It has been pretty obvious for a long time now they needed to get there, and well, they did. And that's that. I'm really not sure what Microsoft's next move is as they don't have shit for exclusives coming out. Nintendo will just drop their price at TGS in response most likely. Or Space World. Or whatever the hell their event is. MS's next move will likely be the Natal bundle sometime next year. The woman without child and pedophile install base simply isn't high enough. 8-) Edit: Also, by then GT5, Uncharted 2, and FFXIV will be out. Not to mention that FFXIII is apparently coming out on the PS3 before the 360 version now. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 20, 2009, 11:12:34 PM Price, marketing, and media backing so far have been the biggest factors in each consoles' success so far. Games, not so much.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tannhauser on August 21, 2009, 04:41:20 AM $299 was the magic price point Sony needed. It has been pretty obvious for a long time now they needed to get there, and well, they did. And that's that. I'm really not sure what Microsoft's next move is as they don't have shit for exclusives coming out. Nintendo will just drop their price at TGS in response most likely. Or Space World. Or whatever the hell their event is. MS's next move will likely be the Natal bundle sometime next year. The woman without child and pedophile install base simply isn't high enough. 8-) Edit: Also, by then GT5, Uncharted 2, and FFXIV will be out. Not to mention that FFXIII is apparently coming out on the PS3 before the 360 version now. Well, the 360 has Halo ODST and Mass Effect 2 coming out. And those are exclusive to the 360. So I doubt they are terrified of the Slim. $299, like you said, has been obviously needed. With it's features, that should be the tipping point to get cheap ass people like me to fork over. Sony has rocketed out of the gate, but the 360 and Wii are halfway around the track. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 21, 2009, 04:47:39 AM I don't know that Halo ODST and Mass Effect 2 will attract new customers to the 360 though. Chances are if you're interested in those games you already got a 360 for Halo 3 and ME1. Splinter Cell: Conviction might bring in some people though, and maybe Alan Wake if they market it well.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2009, 08:03:23 AM I agree with Velorath. Who doesn't already have a 360 that might want one? I'd wager the same people who would buy used copies of Halo and Gears of War to go with it. I'm not counting the people who are buying replacement 360s.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 21, 2009, 08:09:07 AM I've still not bought a 360.. I wouldn't mind having one, but other shit comes up, and it's not really important.
This sounds exactly like the same thing I did last time around. I bought the Xbox when it was really on the cheap, and just used it for a couple of Bioware RPG's. :grin: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ghambit on August 21, 2009, 12:10:59 PM The 360 needs to embrace itself as a creation machine and let the PS3 be for raw exclusive entertainment.
As it's looking now, that's where the companies seem to be steering themselves. Problem is, one market is much larger than the other. :oh_i_see: Aaaaaand, BB just took down their slim pre-orders and pretty much their entire stock is gone. Time to go retail hunting. My HDTV arrives on Monday, must has PS3. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hoax on August 21, 2009, 01:14:04 PM And anyone here besides me who actually likes the styling on the old version better? edit: christ, BB is already pretty much sold out Yeah, I like the styling of the old ones, but smaller is definitely better. The network name for my PS3 has been Monolith from Day 1. :grin: That said, it's still the best PS3 (the 60 gig/BC). One of the few times I've splurged for gaming hardware, and not regretting it. You guys are crazy, the ps3 is probably the ugliest thing I've ever spent over $100 on. It looks like a squat fugly mass of cheap black plastic that is always dusty looking. I don't regret the purchase, but I do wish I had more time and money for bluray discs, god BR is fantastic looking. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 21, 2009, 01:20:14 PM Quote You guys are crazy, the ps3 is probably the ugliest thing I've ever spent over $100. I'd agree if Microsoft hadn't started making consoles. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hindenburg on August 21, 2009, 01:24:36 PM You're gonna argue which console is uglier? Cue special olympics pic.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hoax on August 21, 2009, 01:26:45 PM We're not, because I said its the ugliest thing I ever spent over $100 on, I wouldn't ever buy a Microsoft console even if it was the last console on earth.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 21, 2009, 01:32:23 PM You're gonna argue which console is uglier? Cue special olympics pic. Considering most of them tend to be out in a living room where everyone can see it, yea, I like my consoles to be aesthetically pleasing. The PS3 at least blends in nice with home theater equipment and doesn't look out of place. The 360 looks like a tumor in a wooden or black entertainment center. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2009, 01:47:47 PM I named mine Knight Rider.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ghambit on August 21, 2009, 02:29:35 PM The 360 was never really designed as a home theatre piece. Was always just a raw-gaming machine (big reason why many treat em like crap and carry them in gaming backpacks). And anything "gamerish" is usually quite ugly. I like the old PS3 design because the buttons are minimal and the gloss finish matches high-end HDTVs. That matte finish on the slim to me would stick out a lot more on a TV stand.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 21, 2009, 02:32:05 PM The 360 was never really designed as a home theatre piece. Was always just a raw-gaming maching This is bullshit. They had videos, exclusively got Netflix, tv shows, and all sorts of other non-gaming shit before Sony. Not to mention they tried to downplay Blu-Ray, and tack on a nasty looking HD-DVD player. Add to that the insult of their HDD pricing and their release of a black one with a much larger hard disc - called ELITE, no less (still surprised Pioneer wasn't all up on their ass) - and you've got something more than a "raw-gaming machine." Which it never was, since when you played games it was doomed to break. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2009, 02:53:00 PM I'm actually having a hard time finding my games under all the advertisements and videos and shit, so, uh... what schild said.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Merusk on August 21, 2009, 03:57:02 PM Who doesn't already have a 360 that might want one? Me, but the continued hardware failure rate means I'll probably never buy one, even though I'd have liked to. If MS had fixed that, I'd have bought one long ago and not looked twice at the PS3. Now that Sony has hit my $ threshold, I'll give them my cash and ignore the 360. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ard on August 21, 2009, 04:23:15 PM I'm actually having a hard time finding my games under all the advertisements and videos and shit, so, uh... what schild said. This is why my Xbox almost never gets turned on anymore, and why I for the most part don't buy games for it. I hate the NXE. I liked the old UI. It was functional albeit a bit ugly. The fact that loading the game in the tray isn't the first option that pops up now when the system loads is beyond retarded (assuming you don't have autoload turned on, which I don't, because it mostly gets used for the Arcade games). Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 21, 2009, 05:52:44 PM The 360 needs to embrace itself as a creation machine and let the PS3 be for raw exclusive entertainment. As it's looking now, that's where the companies seem to be steering themselves. Problem is, one market is much larger than the other. :oh_i_see: Nah, The 360 has the gamer lead at the moment (new PS3 price point will lessen that) so they were going after the left-field-casual demographic with project :pedobear: and stupid Molyneaux presentations. Really though, it's the 3rd parties who make all the best stuff (IMO) so it doesn't matter what they (or Sony) try to embrace at this point. As for ugly consoles, the 360 is okay looking. You should be thinking about the US SNES, or the ugliest of them all, the Original XBox. You know, shaped like an X. With a circle of stupid in the middle of the top of the casing. Still makes for a great media centre, though. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2009, 06:05:07 PM Who doesn't already have a 360 that might want one? Me, but the continued hardware failure rate means I'll probably never buy one, even though I'd have liked to. If MS had fixed that, I'd have bought one long ago and not looked twice at the PS3. Now that Sony has hit my $ threshold, I'll give them my cash and ignore the 360. You aptly point out that you are someone who might not want one. Ard. Ard. Hey, Ard. Last Remnant. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ard on August 21, 2009, 06:06:30 PM I've been playing it. But it's the only thing my Xbox has been turned on for in like the last six months since I finished Tales of Vesperia, and I'm still thinking I should have just paid full price for the PC version.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2009, 06:07:57 PM I KNOW BECUZ DATS WAT IVE BEEN DOIN
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ard on August 21, 2009, 06:12:43 PM THIS THREAD R4 PS3, GTFO :uhrr:
edit: this applies to both of me, if that wasn't obvious, or you, or... whatever, I'm so confused Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 21, 2009, 07:01:57 PM I don't mean to say the PS3 is some hallmark of design, but I prefer the piano black to the duller black on the slim. I've got Samsung equipment to match it, I guess. :oh_i_see:
Generally speaking, I don't think there's actually been a cool looking console since the PS1 :P Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 21, 2009, 08:29:31 PM I don't even think the PS1 looked good. But who cares? Let's face it, no game console looks so good that it won't be a cockblock. "Yea, baby, this is my pad..." "Like, is that a GameCube? Gross. I'm outie! Come on, girls."
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 21, 2009, 11:46:47 PM Oh, I'm quite embarrassed that I have a PS3. Good thing no one really knows how much it cost.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 22, 2009, 12:01:09 AM Oh, I'm quite embarrassed that I have a PS3. Good thing no one really knows how much it cost. What a pussy, I'm not embarrassed and I have two. Of course, I refuse to splitscreen game, so it makes some back-asswards sense to have two. Also, because I got the second one for $214 and it's a 60GB BC.Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Fabricated on August 22, 2009, 12:13:49 AM I don't get why Miicrosoft hasn't done a slim or at least a redesign of the console since the pieces of shit I guess have a failure rate of 50% or thereabouts.
That's fucking class action lawsuit material, but I think the same study that reported that said that only like 4% or so of 360 owners wouldn't buy another one due to the poor build quality. They've got some real retards on the hook. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hawkbit on August 22, 2009, 02:48:58 AM I think I've put more hours on my 2 month old PS3 than I have on my 2 year old Wii. Unless Sony really screws things up in the next decade or two, I'm not sure I'll buy another company's console ever. Unless they go super cheap, like buying a 360 at $100 or something. The only issue there is that it's not just $100. Need cables, extra controllers, Live access, etc.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: CaptainNapkin on August 22, 2009, 10:17:40 AM Too much hype a few months ago over Demon's Souls so at this price I broke down and pre-ordered a slim. Just got a shipping update on it - Delivery estimate: August 27, 2009. Didn't expect it that fast, I haven't even ordered a copy of DS yet. Time to search threads to see what else I need to pick up.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hawkbit on August 22, 2009, 11:10:08 AM Uncharted is down to MSRP of $30, MGS4 is the same. My favorite game so far has been InFAMOUS. Had to get Oblivion because it never ran correctly on my PC.
Download Fat Princess and Flower, both of which were great experiences. That should hold you off for a few weeks. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 22, 2009, 11:30:42 AM I'd hold off on MGS4 if your ever going to attempt to do trophies with it. I sent my PS3 in for servicing (fan issue) and lost all my save game data so now i'm waiting for if they ever patch it like Uncharted was.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tale on August 23, 2009, 02:58:33 AM I'll continue to wait and see. The Australian Price will, I'm sure, continue to be horrifying. Got an email from EB just now. AU$499, Available from Sep 3rd. AU$499 = US$409 US$299 = AU$364 So we're only being shafted by about $100 this time. Yay. Today I pre-ordered a PS3 Slim at JB Hi-Fi for A$494 with a HDMI cable thrown in. The "Game" chain of stores is buying used Wii consoles for A$280-ish instore credit. So I'll probably trade them my Wii for some PS3 games. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 23, 2009, 07:34:29 AM um.. well done?
I'll wait until later, when the christmas bundles arrive though, since when I get a PS3 I'll also want another HDMI cable, a second controller, a BR remote, a bigger HDD to swap in right away, and, you know, some games. That'll bump up the purchase by at least $300 before any of those game things get involved. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ahoythematey on August 23, 2009, 10:57:28 AM You need a drive bigger than 120 right away?
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: NiX on August 23, 2009, 11:07:00 AM You need a drive bigger than 120 right away? That's what I was thinking. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: stray on August 23, 2009, 12:13:17 PM It's really more than adequate. Unless, like I said, you want to turn it into a media center. But why would you if had a PC? Games will certainly not hog that space.. Especially if you were very discriminating when it comes to games. Which you are. :grin:
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 23, 2009, 03:18:01 PM I'd get the larger drive upfront so I then never have to think or worry about it later, and more importantly don't have to lose my saves and such. My original XBox makes for a fine media centre on the second TV. The PS3 by the way will be plugged into my TV and not my monitor. Basically, throw a TB in there, and forget about it forever.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tale on August 24, 2009, 04:37:40 AM um.. well done? I'll wait until later, when the christmas bundles arrive though, since when I get a PS3 I'll also want another HDMI cable, a second controller, a BR remote, a bigger HDD to swap in right away, and, you know, some games. That'll bump up the purchase by at least $300 before any of those game things get involved. BTW if you have a Sony Bravia TV you won't need a remote. The Slim has Bravia Sync which lets you use the TV remote. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 24, 2009, 04:44:44 AM I don't know what the hell people are putting on either console that they need bigger drives (unless they have really cheap 360s with like 20GB drives).
I have 2 60GB PS3s and neither is halfway full. I delete shit when I playing it. I have an elite 360 with a harddrive that is incapable of being filled. Mostly because it will probably never get turned on again. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tale on August 24, 2009, 05:45:42 AM I don't know what the hell people are putting on either console that they need bigger drives (unless they have really cheap 360s with like 20GB drives). Video on demand stuff? I have no idea what such services are available or what the quality/retention time is, just suggesting what could fill drives. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 24, 2009, 05:46:46 AM Anyone on this board that uses video on demand instead of just grabbing shit off the net and streaming it has shamed me and my people. And by my people, I mean the jews.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Tale on August 24, 2009, 05:48:59 AM [... goes off to watch true.blood.0210.hdtv.xvid-notv]
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Hawkbit on August 24, 2009, 06:08:33 AM um.. well done? I'll wait until later, when the christmas bundles arrive though, since when I get a PS3 I'll also want another HDMI cable, a second controller, a BR remote, a bigger HDD to swap in right away, and, you know, some games. That'll bump up the purchase by at least $300 before any of those game things get involved. BTW if you have a Sony Bravia TV you won't need a remote. The Slim has Bravia Sync which lets you use the TV remote. That's slim only, right? I've never been able to get my Bravia to recognize my 80gig PS3 as an HDMI device, although it is. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 24, 2009, 06:09:33 AM Surely that's a function of the firmware and not the hardware, in which case it might come with FW3.00.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 24, 2009, 06:14:38 AM I'll throw my hat in with the "get a larger drive right away if you are going to do it at all" group. No, I haven't filled up my 60GB.
Also you won't lose your saves if you do a backup to an external, so it's not really critical, just bothersome. A note about the Backup option is that it seems to get everything, so you will either want a large external or you will need to pick-and-choose if you are using a USB stick or something. I almost said Memory Stick. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Velorath on August 24, 2009, 12:01:51 PM I have an elite 360 with a harddrive that is incapable of being filled. Mostly because it will probably never get turned on again. :awesome_for_real: That's going to make it pretty hard to play Alan Wake. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 24, 2009, 12:23:40 PM I have an elite 360 with a harddrive that is incapable of being filled. Mostly because it will probably never get turned on again. :awesome_for_real: That's going to make it pretty hard to play Alan Wake. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: CaptainNapkin on August 24, 2009, 09:26:23 PM Anyone on this board that uses video on demand instead of just grabbing shit off the net and streaming it has shamed me and my people. And by my people, I mean the jews. If streaming Netflix classifies as VOD then I'm guilty... with a Tivo & 360 it's the best 9 bucks/month I've ever spent. Besides I'm old and lazy and consider torrents a hassle vs. that cost. But like others mentioned, the streaming takes up little to no drive space. With a 120g drive in my 360 I just recently hit 50% capacity, and I'm lazy about cleaning stuff off it.... I still feel dirty paying for it. edit - typing is hard Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 24, 2009, 10:19:03 PM I don't know what the hell people are putting on either console that they need bigger drives (unless they have really cheap 360s with like 20GB drives). I have 2 60GB PS3s and neither is halfway full. I delete shit when I playing it. I have an elite 360 with a harddrive that is incapable of being filled. Mostly because it will probably never get turned on again. :awesome_for_real: Guitar Hero/Rock Band DLC mostly, XBLA Games, a half dozen or so demos that can sit there till I get around to demoing them. Also with a good chunk of "real" games I'm playing at any given time installed to save the wear on the drive. I also had a bunch of videos on it at one point. And yeah, we know you :heart: your ps3 and don't like your 360. Good for you. Maybe you should sell/trade in that sucker along with your Wii? :awesome_for_real: BTW if you have a Sony Bravia TV you won't need a remote. The Slim has Bravia Sync which lets you use the TV remote. I have a Samsung, but that's interesting to know at least. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 24, 2009, 10:21:37 PM And yeah, we know you :heart: your ps3 and don't like your 360. Good for you. Maybe you should sell/trade in that sucker along with your Wii? :awesome_for_real: I keep the shitty systems just in case they have something I absolutely positively can not miss. Even the Gamecube had a couple games I HAD TO PLAY DAY 1. But then I got them on the PS2 and enjoyed them more there (god I hated the GC controller). Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Azazel on August 24, 2009, 11:02:18 PM That's a fair enough cop.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ffc on August 25, 2009, 02:42:05 PM /derail
Until now I kept consoles until they broke or the next generation hit but this holiday season I may sell my Wii. Natal and the PS3 wands will let me go full retard just fine and I won't have to deal with terrible graphics to do so. Depends on how strong I feel the call of Mario and Zelda I guess. /rerail A local Best Buy has a bunch of slims in stock today and I am going to pick one up. Besides Uncharted I was thinking about Folklore. Posts from 2007 seem to approve but will it feel dated now? Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 25, 2009, 02:58:28 PM Folklore always felt dated, but boy is it gorgeous.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 25, 2009, 04:56:12 PM I don't think age is Folklore's problem. Don't forget to get the dlc for it.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Trippy on August 25, 2009, 05:04:33 PM Fuck! The PS3 Slim can't run Linux.
Edit: or I should say they removed the ability to install other OSes on it. It could probably still run Linux if somebody figured out a way around that (like taking the drive out, installing Linux that way and putting it back in). Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: fuser on August 25, 2009, 05:14:04 PM Fuck! The PS3 Slim can't run Linux. Is this confirmed on 2.80 or newer firmware? Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Trippy on August 25, 2009, 05:16:49 PM Dunno. The articles I read didn't mention if they removed that feature from the non-slims in a firmware update. I would doubt it though.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Yegolev on August 25, 2009, 06:33:07 PM What version do the Slims ship with? I kinda assumed 3.0 but no idea.
Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: schild on August 25, 2009, 07:21:12 PM Fuck! The PS3 Slim can't run Linux. Oh, whatever will we do. :roll: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: bhodi on August 26, 2009, 10:05:26 AM They are not removing it from the non-slims. They are removing it from the slims due to the overhead required to support it from a hardware perspective. The quote was something like "Other OSes were not in our 'lower cost' efforts and thus were removed". Non-slims will continue to support booting from other OSes.
Not that it matters as they still refuse to unlock the RSX chip. No "real" development can occur until they do and I've given up hope that it will ever be the case. The chief reason I bought a PS3 is that I was under the impression that it would replace my aging XBMC. I was very, totally, and horribly wrong. Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: ffc on August 27, 2009, 01:49:39 AM What version do the Slims ship with? I kinda assumed 3.0 but no idea. Mine came with 2.76. Also, I was not prepared for the XMB to rock my face with awesome compared to the other consoles' menus. Have the multiplayer connectivity issues in Fat Princess been successfully fixed? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on August 27, 2009, 07:02:12 AM Nice, they ship them out such that you can patch it right away.
The XMB is what a console interface should be. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on August 27, 2009, 08:06:47 AM Nice, they ship them out such that you can patch it right away. The XMB is what a console interface should be. And you can mod that fucker without paying for expensive themes! Second thing I did after putting in a larger hard drive. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on August 27, 2009, 10:51:34 AM Good point, you can use any old jpg as a background. Pictures of the family can make it hard to find the icons, but if you want to whip up something in a editor and use it, easy easy easy. Also there are quite a few decent themes for free. Currently I have the inFamous icons with the standard wavy background.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 27, 2009, 10:53:55 AM Good point, you can use any old jpg as a background. Pictures of the family can make it hard to find the icons, but if you want to whip up something in a editor and use it, easy easy easy. Also there are quite a few decent themes for free. Currently I have the inFamous icons with the standard wavy background. Or you can use high quality PNGs and not have artifacts.Title: Re: PS3 [HIJACKED FOR GAMESCOM] Post by: Ard on August 27, 2009, 11:09:05 AM Have the multiplayer connectivity issues in Fat Princess been successfully fixed? Yes. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: SnakeCharmer on August 28, 2009, 11:58:17 AM So. Um. Does anyone make a better PS3 controller than Sony?
Really, really hate the PS3 controller. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: CaptainNapkin on August 29, 2009, 04:13:55 PM So my slim showed up the other day and I must say I was impressed out of the box. It's got a good footprint, it's quiet and I didn't have to spend an extra hour during setup to figure out how to hide a monstrous power brick since there is none, yay! My copy of Demon's Souls hasn't showed up yet so I picked up a used copy of the original Uncharted on the cheap and it's a fun little game. I think I'm most excited about the silence of this thing though, as my 360 has been my main DVD system it's nice to not need to crank the volume up to overcome the noise of the system. I probably need to poke around more, but my initial opinion is that 360 still wins on the interface and online integration fronts. I'm one of the wacky ones that prefered the switch to the new 360 UI. Not to mention, jumping on the PS3 bandwagon now gives me a few of the now classic early releases on the cheap, which is a bonus.
I also haven't figured out if there's a setting to allow downloads to continue after powering the unit off, still waiting for 3 demos to finish DL and show up as playable. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on August 29, 2009, 06:17:56 PM I also haven't figured out if there's a setting to allow downloads to continue after powering the unit off, still waiting for 3 demos to finish DL and show up as playable. IIRCC, just go to "shut down" over the profile names, and you will get the option. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 29, 2009, 06:29:37 PM If I wanted to upgrade the HD on the PS3 (slim) after I had a bunch of saves and other data on it, would this method work?:
* Take out existing drive * Install new drive (using firmware on flash drive) * Hook up old drive via USB (i.e. installed in an external case) * Copy files from old drive to new drive Basically I'm trying to decide if I get a PS3 soon whether or not to upgrade the HD immediately or wait a while until I fill the original drive. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tannhauser on August 29, 2009, 07:39:38 PM I didn't investigate, but at BB earlier I saw the slim was sold out. However they had a 80gp unit for $299 right beside it. Why would you buy the slim in this case?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 29, 2009, 07:46:23 PM 40 GB more space and about half the power usage (if you care about such things).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 29, 2009, 07:48:59 PM 40 GB more space and about half the power usage (if you care about such things). Technically it should work. I lost all my saves swapping consoles tho :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 29, 2009, 07:50:16 PM Technically it should work. I lost all my saves swapping consoles tho :uhrr: What happened?Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on August 30, 2009, 02:38:20 AM I copied my PS3 data to my PC via 4GB flash drive. It's just normal files in folders, nothing magical. This includes the PS2 and PS1 saves I carry around. I'm suppose your method would work but if it was me, I'd copy the files to an external that wasn't part of the swap process.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 30, 2009, 02:27:45 PM What happened? It said the data was secure content written for the previous console. Where the chip/id/mac whatever it uses to prevent copying of data, it wouldn't restore the saved data. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 31, 2009, 09:37:06 PM Firmware 3.0 just went live.
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/08/31/playstation-3-firmware-v3-00-update-imminent/ Edit:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 31, 2009, 10:51:27 PM You are required to update to 3.00 if you want to access the store now :oh_i_see:
Couple things missing from the above plus link but mentioned in the release notes: Audio can now be output to multiple connectors simultaneously During video playback the right stick can now control the speed and direction Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 31, 2009, 11:03:23 PM Holy shit those sparkles are annoying.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 31, 2009, 11:11:06 PM FUCK you can't turn off the scrolling ticker now FUCK
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on August 31, 2009, 11:11:55 PM FUCK you can't turn off the scrolling ticker now FUCK You'll live.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on August 31, 2009, 11:20:47 PM Maybe. They better have a panda avatar soon, though!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 31, 2009, 11:36:23 PM The network file access is way faster, and generating thumbnails isn't bogging down as much. Also a new slider indicator when your scrolling down a lot of content to show how far from top and to the bottom you are.
Also i think they did something with the media control. Unless its new to me you can hold on the circle right to fast forward and release to go to play. So a tap + hold sets you up at 10x speed and then release to jump right into play. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on August 31, 2009, 11:37:57 PM Oh rewinding streaming content way more fluid @10x
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on September 01, 2009, 04:30:17 AM I don't mind the sparklies, there seems to be no enforced scrolling ticker on the EU version and I do like the better media streaming a lot.
Not keen on the giant icons though :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 01, 2009, 06:09:36 AM Audio can now be output to multiple connectors simultaneously Cool. Now only if they could do the same thing for the video, that'd be golden. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 01, 2009, 06:45:40 AM I didn't even know you could turn off the ticker. Didn't look, though. I will have to update this afternoon, didn't know it was up.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 01, 2009, 07:02:21 AM That's like the first thing I did when setting up my PS3. I hate those sorts of animated visual distractions.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: bhodi on September 01, 2009, 07:49:21 AM Same. Fuck I don't need to be thrown advertisements the instant I turn on my ps3.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on September 01, 2009, 08:21:05 AM The whole store under every menu is pretty much crap when regions like canada cannot buy videos :uhrr:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 01, 2009, 08:32:41 AM I don't spend enough time staring at the XMB for it to bother me, I guess. Or I spend too much time having the 360 Dashboard inflicted upon me to feel any nag from the ticker. vOv I'm suspicious of the new store thingy, integrating it more tightly into the XMB could pass my annoyance threshold. I can't wait to find out how angry this update makes me!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 01, 2009, 09:07:53 AM On the old version I was having issues with downloading demos in the background, even if only 1 was in process it wouldn't work. This update fixed that issue so I'm happy with it overall.
I didn't mind the sparkles or ticker that much since I was able to pay no mind to them. I don't like them, but it's not troublesome or going to make me want to punt my ps3 or anything. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 01, 2009, 10:08:15 AM Change your background theme to remove sparkles.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 01, 2009, 05:01:26 PM First thing I did after installing the update was switch back to the classic theme.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 01, 2009, 06:10:19 PM I just switched the background to Classic, the oh-so-slightly-larger icons are fine. The new font is also just a tiny bit larger, which is good for me and my setup. That ticker is a bit more distracting, though.
I found a few new options, or I think I did since I don't remember seeing them, such as the option to turn the controller off after 10 minutes of inactivity. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 01, 2009, 06:12:54 PM I found a few new options, or I think I did since I don't remember seeing them, such as the option to turn the controller off after 10 minutes of inactivity. That was in there before 3.00. My Slim which came with 2.72 or something like that had that in there already.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 01, 2009, 06:21:27 PM I have an active imagination.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on September 02, 2009, 01:36:50 PM The price on 20GB won't go down unless BC comes back. It did, and so did the 60 I bought from Gamestop. Schild wrong? HOW CAN THIS BE? :P Too bad I didn't get any manuals or boxes or anything. Just a massive ass clamshell that threatened to cut me. Thankfully my upscale DVD player's HDMI cable works on the things so no need to compete with the 360 and Wii for the component/composite slots. Opening cinematic to Cross Edge looks purdy. Wish I could put the Sixaxis LR 2 Triggers on the 360 controller, and the Wii's Classic Controller D Pad. I would then have a damned perfect controller. I plan on getting a Madcatz SF4 TE stick since I can use it on 3 generations of PS games, plus on my iMac for Mame and Commodore 64 titles. H.E.R.O. would be :awesome_for_real: with a fearsome beast like that. I have Warhammer 40K to play so more thoughts and questions will wait. (And speaking of expensive shit I don't need I preordered the new badass Space Hulk boardgame. ) Mock away fanboys. (Oh yeah, Operation Darkness is pretty kickass, outside of it being on the abusive side of the SRPG difficulty curve. Its no Fire Emblem or X Com Terror From the Deep mind you, but it sure as hell isn't Shining Force either. One mission ended up taking 2 weeks of casual play to beat and it required grinding France, a little Energon, and a lot of luck.) I currently have cheap ebay bids (hell, selling crap I don't need on ebay is financing this economically retarded purchase!) on LBP, Disgaea 3, and Valkyria Chronicles. Outside of Demon's Souls though there aren't many games I absolutely must have, though I will probably get Virtua Fighter 5, SF4, and Soul Calibur 4 since I will have a stupidly expensive/awesome joystick. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 02, 2009, 02:19:35 PM Quote It did, and so did the 60 I bought from Gamestop. Schild wrong? HOW CAN THIS BE? :P Gamestop had them used for $200 and $299 respectively when I got my second 60GB. Are you telling me they went down further from there? If so, I can't be blamed for them being idiots. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on September 02, 2009, 02:25:22 PM Gamestop's website lists the 60 at $329.99.
My 80 doesn't have BC anyways, so I'm probably going to sell it to a friend and grab a Slim. Smaller and more power efficient. If I had a BC system, I wouldn't even think about it. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on September 02, 2009, 05:32:57 PM I currently have cheap ebay bids (hell, selling crap I don't need on ebay is financing this economically retarded purchase!) on LBP, Disgaea 3, and Valkyria Chronicles. Outside of Demon's Souls though there aren't many games I absolutely must have . . . . I found a new copy of Folklore for $15 and am waiting for it to arrive. I had first tried a local GameStop that was supposed to have it in stock but a manager had taken it. :uhrr: While at GameStop the clerk tried to sell me on some other PS3 games and I told him I wasn't really interested in anything until Demon's Souls. He laughed and told me to stay away from it because it is too hard to be fun. He went on to say if you go around a corner you might get killed because you didn't have your shield up. Then you have to fight back to your body. And you might die again. You see other players dying. And the bosses will kill you. At first I didn't understand how he viewed anything he just said as a negative. And then it clicked. Standing in front of me was bizarro schild. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Khaldun on September 02, 2009, 06:08:43 PM Me love Wii, it am the best!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 02, 2009, 09:25:04 PM While at GameStop the clerk tried to sell me on some other PS3 games and I told him I wasn't really interested in anything until Demon's Souls. He laughed and told me to stay away from it because it is too hard to be fun. He went on to say if you go around a corner you might get killed because you didn't have your shield up. Then you have to fight back to your body. And you might die again. You see other players dying. And the bosses will kill you. At first I didn't understand how he viewed anything he just said as a negative. And then it clicked. Standing in front of me was bizarro schild. Is there a demo of it on PSN? No idea about this gamestop manager, but that description sounds as fun as Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 02, 2009, 09:27:11 PM (And speaking of expensive shit I don't need I preordered the new badass Space Hulk boardgame. ) Mock away fanboys. saturday, Saturday! SATURDAY! :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 02, 2009, 09:35:00 PM I currently have cheap ebay bids (hell, selling crap I don't need on ebay is financing this economically retarded purchase!) on LBP, Disgaea 3, and Valkyria Chronicles. Outside of Demon's Souls though there aren't many games I absolutely must have . . . . I found a new copy of Folklore for $15 and am waiting for it to arrive. I had first tried a local GameStop that was supposed to have it in stock but a manager had taken it. :uhrr: While at GameStop the clerk tried to sell me on some other PS3 games and I told him I wasn't really interested in anything until Demon's Souls. He laughed and told me to stay away from it because it is too hard to be fun. He went on to say if you go around a corner you might get killed because you didn't have your shield up. Then you have to fight back to your body. And you might die again. You see other players dying. And the bosses will kill you. At first I didn't understand how he viewed anything he just said as a negative. And then it clicked. Standing in front of me was bizarro schild. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on September 02, 2009, 10:30:42 PM No idea about this gamestop manager, but that description [of Demon's Souls] sounds as fun as Haha, that is exactly what I thought. I was reminded specifically of dying several times in a row and losing a level while trying to recover my corpse in the bottom of Dalnir. Oh how I raged. But looking back with my rose colored glasses through a rose colored window in my rose colored house, I miss consequences to dying. Not EQ though. That can burn. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 02, 2009, 10:52:21 PM Quote Is there a demo of it on PSN? It's the best console game I've ever played.No idea about this gamestop manager, but that description sounds as fun as pounding nails into my dick old-school Everquest. And there wasn't a demo in Asia, so I can't imagine there would be one here. I can't think of a single Atlus game that ever got a demo for that matter. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 03, 2009, 06:57:35 AM I almost linked this (http://www.holybadman.com/) but realized it's N1 and not Atlus. I get those two confused a good bit.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on September 03, 2009, 12:25:05 PM This sounds like any one of the gamestop people in Austin. I have yet to find a good gaming store here, which is shocking simply because of how many game devs there are. For new games you are pretty much screwed, but you may want to check out Game Over (http://www.gameovervideogames.com/). Gamefellas (http://www.gamefellasentertainment.com/) isn't as nice a store, but they almost always have some nice deals on older systems. When gamestop and EB merged, Austin pretty much ceased to have good game stores for buying current stuff. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 03, 2009, 06:32:12 PM Having to use FAT32 for the filesystem sucks donkey balls.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 03, 2009, 06:35:26 PM This sounds like any one of the gamestop people in Austin. I have yet to find a good gaming store here, which is shocking simply because of how many game devs there are. For new games you are pretty much screwed, but you may want to check out Game Over (http://www.gameovervideogames.com/). Gamefellas (http://www.gamefellasentertainment.com/) isn't as nice a store, but they almost always have some nice deals on older systems. When gamestop and EB merged, Austin pretty much ceased to have good game stores for buying current stuff. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ahoythematey on September 03, 2009, 08:11:42 PM Sounds like one of us has had some abnormal experiences then, because I've generally had a reasonable experience in Game Over. Gamefellas is very hit-or-miss, but I have found a few things there that were underpriced.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 03, 2009, 09:33:53 PM The PS3 Slim hard drive replacement is very easy. There's one screw on the bottom hidden behind a small panel you have remove (a fingernail can pop the panel open or you can use a small screwdriver). Then the panel in front that the hard drive hides behind slides open and you just pull the hard drive tray out (the hard drive is underneath the Blu-ray drive on the Slim). The screws were very easy to remove on my machine, unlike some of the stories I read about the screws on the fatties.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on September 03, 2009, 10:53:09 PM (And speaking of expensive shit I don't need I preordered the new badass Space Hulk boardgame. ) Mock away fanboys. saturday, Saturday! SATURDAY! :awesome_for_real: Oh, you mean Wednesday? My Marines are clipped off, and filed, just waiting for me to Dremel off all the Blood Angels iconography and make them Crimson Fists and Pre Heresy World Eaters. The door holders are all basecoated black and awaiting some silver drybrushing. The Broodlord is clipped together and prepped, and a couple of his homies are too. (I prefer the original Space Hulk era Stealers personally. But these will get painted up classical GS colorscheme.) All the pieces are organized and in baggies. And to prepare for the upcoming Genestealer Apocalypse I have been playing some V2: http://wargamedork.blogspot.com/2009/08/space-hulk-mission-1-1-comic-report.html And of course, using VMWare Fusion to take the Space Wolves through Teardown's Space Hulk V1 game. (Yes I have a bright and shiny PS3 and I am mostly playing with toy soldiers and low graphics fanmade projects.) But I do have a quick PS3 question. Is Smooth and Widescreen the only BC options? I was expecting something... sharper, ala some Antialiasing or tricks the emulators all pull off. (Oh yeah anyone who wants to friend me can do so as I am on as Cpt_Rufus ) And how is Resistance Fall of Man? And can I really use Mouse Keyboard for it if I want? Oh and my fancypants joystick will need to be pretty so which of these 5 pictures (4 are in 1) would be best? http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2530/3885018671_2980e4a953_o.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2527/3885018587_86f7c6f6f9_o.png I'm partial to Nei, the Vindicare Assassin, and the VF1S with Fast Packs in Gerwalk for how they would look on a joystick face, but I do like all of them. Finding nice widescreen pictures I would like was a pain! Now I just have to hope that just announced Data East arcade collection gets on the PS3 as well. Bad Dudes and Magical Drop 3 with a nice joystick? Hell yeah. (Shutup about emulators. I go legal first dammit.) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 03, 2009, 10:55:11 PM What the hell are you doing?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on September 03, 2009, 10:59:58 PM What the hell are you doing? As I mentioned I am gonna get that ridiculously expensive Madcatz SF4 TE stick for my new expensive game console. You can mod them in various ways including the art. Thus the pictures are ones I may choose from to use on my stick. And thus I am asking for art opinions on them. But in the interests of page size, I shall turn them into a link instead. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 03, 2009, 11:06:29 PM Spoiler tags work too.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 04, 2009, 12:59:38 AM Oh, you mean Wednesday? My Marines are clipped off, and filed, just waiting for me to Dremel off all the Blood Angels iconography and make them Crimson Fists and Pre Heresy World Eaters. The door holders are all basecoated black and awaiting some silver drybrushing. The Broodlord is clipped together and prepped, and a couple of his homies are too. (I prefer the original Space Hulk era Stealers personally. But these will get painted up classical GS colorscheme.) All the pieces are organized and in baggies. It's tomorrow here. So picking it up then. Might open it up and have a browse, but no chance of playing it for a few weeks, so they can sit unpainted on the sprues for awhile. Or possibly forever. Quote Oh and my fancypants joystick will need to be pretty so which of these 5 pictures (4 are in 1) would be best? http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2530/3885018671_2980e4a953_o.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2527/3885018587_86f7c6f6f9_o.png I'm partial to Nei, the Vindicare Assassin, and the VF1S with Fast Packs in Gerwalk for how they would look on a joystick face, but I do like all of them. Finding nice widescreen pictures I would like was a pain! Um, dunno. Whatever you like? Prettying up a joystick with printed artwork is a bit like using those stupid stickers they give you with Guitar Hero games to me. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 01:04:33 AM Jain Zar's tremendously bad taste in artwork aside, the SFIV CE sticks do need their picture replaced, and the buttons needs to be replaced with Sanwa buttons, but that's neither here nor there. It's nothing like using the guitar hero stickers.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 04, 2009, 01:11:03 AM These things?
http://www.itechnews.net/2008/12/11/mad-catz-street-fighter-iv-fightstick/ (http://www.itechnews.net/2008/12/11/mad-catz-street-fighter-iv-fightstick/) I can't contain my indifference for the artwork. But for me, agonizing over replacing them (especially with those pics) is the same thing. Really though, he can do what he wants. I won't ever use his joystick, :why_so_serious: so what do I care? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 01:13:06 AM These things? Well, yea, agonizing over pictures is just stupid. And yes, particularly when they're THOSE pictures. This one is much better.http://www.itechnews.net/2008/12/11/mad-catz-street-fighter-iv-fightstick/ (http://www.itechnews.net/2008/12/11/mad-catz-street-fighter-iv-fightstick/) I can't contain my indifference for the artwork. But for me, agonizing over replacing them (especially with those pics) is the same thing. Really though, he can do what he wants. I won't ever use his joystick, :why_so_serious: so what do I care? (http://l337sheet.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/pedostickte1.jpg?w=500&h=333) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 04, 2009, 01:17:01 AM ok, I LOLed. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Jain Zar on September 04, 2009, 01:51:04 AM Ok then Mr Art snob types, then you find me some good art to use.
My preferences: Phantasy Star and Ultima series (Solo games not the online MMO stuff), Robotech, Super Robot Taisen, Contra, Castlevania, Aliens Transformers G1 and Beast Wars, Warhammer 40K (Chaos Space Marines primarily). I also like the Batfamily, Giant robots of all sorts, the SR 71 Blackbird, and Dragon Quest. Put your mouse clicks where yer mouths are then. I am open to suggestions. Constructive ones. I know, that's HARD and all, but why not try it on for size? Its amazing what it can accomplish. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: FatuousTwat on September 04, 2009, 03:27:26 AM These things? Well, yea, agonizing over pictures is just stupid. And yes, particularly when they're THOSE pictures. This one is much better.http://www.itechnews.net/2008/12/11/mad-catz-street-fighter-iv-fightstick/ (http://www.itechnews.net/2008/12/11/mad-catz-street-fighter-iv-fightstick/) I can't contain my indifference for the artwork. But for me, agonizing over replacing them (especially with those pics) is the same thing. Really though, he can do what he wants. I won't ever use his joystick, :why_so_serious: so what do I care? (http://l337sheet.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/pedostickte1.jpg?w=500&h=333) Would have been much better if they could have somehow made his crotch under the stick. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 04, 2009, 04:09:43 AM See, this is your problem:
My preferences: Phantasy Star and Ultima series (Solo games not the online MMO stuff), Robotech, Super Robot Taisen, Contra, Castlevania, Aliens Transformers G1 and Beast Wars, Warhammer 40K (Chaos Space Marines primarily). I also like the Batfamily, Giant robots of all sorts, the SR 71 Blackbird, and Dragon Quest. I mean, I like some of those things too, but I don't need them on my joystick. But here, take your pick of Blackbirds. http://images.google.com.au/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=sr-71+blackbird&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=t96gSseQHISIkAXA1pjXDw&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1 Or if you like Alien, buy this book, and get a colour photocopy done of the image of your choice. http://www.museumsyndicate.com/item.php?item=20214 Or this one (large format book - both of these are worth owning): http://www.biblio.com/books/74639012.html There's also a bunch of decent-quality Giger images here if you just want to print. http://www.museumsyndicate.com/artist.php?artist=561 If you must do 40k, fuck that shitty wannabe-Mark Gibbons pencil art and go right for the good stuff: http://www.redknuckle.com/images/sales/world%20eater.jpg http://www.freewebs.com/trolllock/mark_gibbons_warhammer_004.jpg http://www.redknuckle.com/images/illustrations/fabius.jpg http://www.redknuckle.com/ This one is perfect for a joystick in terms of layout http://www.redknuckle.com/images/0808/grimaldus08_main.jpg For Batman, stay away from cutesy fanfic line art and go right for the good stuff. :awesome_for_real: http://thecia.com.au/reviews/b/images/batman-and-robin-6.jpg ..Okay. but there's evocative stuff like this around. http://www.studiodaily.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/batman_imax.jpg Or, you know, whatever Phantasy Star charpics or Southern Cross Dana Sterling wankfest floats your boat. Like I said, it's your joystick. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 04, 2009, 06:45:06 AM Having to use FAT32 for the filesystem sucks donkey balls. Are you trying to install linux? I, for one, am interested in your tales even if I'm not interested in doing it myself. Also, I agree about fat32. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 07:39:30 AM No I wasn't since I have the Slim. Formatting a drive larger than 32 GB for FAT32 turns out to be an issue under Windows XP. And then when I did manage to get a drive formatted larger than 32 GB it would BSoD one of my Windows machines :uhrr:
I also now understand why people take the time to convert stuff to H.264 to playback on the PS3 even though it can play MPEG-2 files and converting to H.264 takes forever. With MPEG-2 you are much more likely to bump into the 4 GB file size limitation on FAT32. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 04, 2009, 08:12:25 AM Is streaming from a PC not an option?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 08:13:06 AM Ok then Mr Art snob types, then you find me some good art to use. First of all, your taste in shit sucks. So that's a big problem. Second of all:My preferences: Phantasy Star and Ultima series (Solo games not the online MMO stuff), Robotech, Super Robot Taisen, Contra, Castlevania, Aliens Transformers G1 and Beast Wars, Warhammer 40K (Chaos Space Marines primarily). I also like the Batfamily, Giant robots of all sorts, the SR 71 Blackbird, and Dragon Quest. Put your mouse clicks where yer mouths are then. I am open to suggestions. Constructive ones. I know, that's HARD and all, but why not try it on for size? Its amazing what it can accomplish. http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/39720/games/castlevania/Castlevania_pck.jpg http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/39720/games/castlevania/Cv_Cover_copy.jpg But I don't really believe you when you say you like Castlevania given all that other shit. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 08:13:21 AM Is streaming from a PC not an option? I do this off my NAS and my Windows box. It's so easy to join!Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on September 04, 2009, 08:21:46 AM converting to H.264 takes forever. ffmpeg + cron, you can script it to auto convert for you and dump the result anywhere your script can access via the network. Seems pretty fast as long as what you are converting can fit in memory but that may be due to the settings i was using. side edit to keep on topic: any chance the Sony Aino (http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/products/mobilephones/topics/aino/fastwebhsdpa) isn't going to be a piece of shit? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Murgos on September 04, 2009, 08:23:33 AM Is streaming from a PC not an option? I do this off my NAS and my Windows box. It's so easy to join!What NAS are you using? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 08:24:39 AM Is streaming from a PC not an option? I do this off my NAS and my Windows box. It's so easy to join!Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 08:26:32 AM converting to H.264 takes forever. ffmpeg + cron, you can script it to auto convert for you and dump the result anywhere your script can access via the network. Seems pretty fast as long as what you are converting can fit in memory but that may be due to the settings i was using.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 08:27:15 AM My computer converts H.264 at 70 frames per second. I don't understand why yours is going so slowly.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 08:28:17 AM Is streaming from a PC not an option? You can stream though a media server. It doesn't seem to like AC-3, though. Not sure why yet.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 08:29:01 AM Is streaming from a PC not an option? You can stream though a media server. It doesn't seem to like AC-3, though. Not sure why yet.Edit: I Suppose I should mention, I never stream anything above 720p. All of my hard drives are old 7200RPM crap. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 08:31:32 AM My computer converts H.264 at 70 frames per second. I don't understand why yours is going so slowly. Cause you are using sucky settings? :awesome_for_real:Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on September 04, 2009, 08:40:07 AM converting to H.264 takes forever. ffmpeg + cron, you can script it to auto convert for you and dump the result anywhere your script can access via the network. Seems pretty fast as long as what you are converting can fit in memory but that may be due to the settings i was using.Not sure how you got to 6fps, I've only used ffmpeg to down convert 720p to flv for the web, a 500meg source file (30min or so of video) takes like 10 minutes to convert. Which is 3 to 5 times faster than doing the same job using the craptastic adobe flv encoder on Win XP. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 08:41:54 AM ffmpeg's Sorenson codec conversion is blazing fast. It's how YouTube manages to keep up with their load.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on September 04, 2009, 02:27:56 PM Random..
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/09/vgcharz-20090904-383.jpg) Link (http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/ps3-and-xbox-360-hardware-sales-jump-last-week-amid-price-cuts/) Thought it was interesting that the 360 and PS3 are competitive with the Wii, for a change. Who knows if that lasts. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 04, 2009, 02:40:46 PM On the week of the new PS3 release you'd expect to see a nice spike.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 04, 2009, 02:55:35 PM 100%+ sales over last week is a nice spike, but next week will be interesting as well with the $100 price drop on the 360 elite to match the ps3 slim price point.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 04, 2009, 02:56:19 PM The thing about a 360 price drop is that more people already have one. I saw some inbred assholes pick up a PS3 Slim at the Best Buy today. It has begun.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 04, 2009, 03:03:48 PM I can't help but notice the "Source: VGChartz" text in the bottom right of that image.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 04, 2009, 03:04:44 PM True, and I do agree to that point. The only thing is, though, the ps3 with their 100% increase in sales over last week is just now selling equal amounts of units as the 360 is before the 360 elite's $100 price drop. That's why I think the next week, well the next few months really, will be very interesting to watch.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 04, 2009, 03:05:19 PM 100%+ sales over last week is a nice spike, but next week will be interesting as well with the $100 price drop on the 360 elite to match the ps3 slim price point. Speaking as someone who owns a 360, doesnt yet own a PS3 and as someone who has been quite critical of the PS3 since it's release, I have to say that a new buyer would have to be stupid to pick up an Elite over a PS3 if they were the same price. For a list of reasons as long as my arm. In fact, there's no point to the Elite at this stage anyway. Put the 120gb drive on the Pro as standard and call it a day. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tale on September 04, 2009, 08:29:41 PM Got my PS3 Slim (previously only had a PC and a Wii). Got a pre-order deal with a HDMI cable and Assassin's Creed thrown in, and still $10 cheaper than other stores. Grabbed a second-hand copy of FIFA 09 which I've been wanting to play. Also bought bargain bin Gears of War and Halo 2 for PC, because I've never played them and catching up years late on PC is my solution to missing Xbox 360 content :)
Years ago, I attended the launch of the original PS3 as a journalist, and considered it laughably feature-bloated and overpriced. But in 2009, the Slim is about right for a current console. Impressed with how compact it is for how powerful it is. Looks tiny sitting on top of the Tivo. The range of capabilities is great - slotted right into my Wi-Fi household out of the box, plays any format of disc from CDs to Blu-ray, and stores CD music. It's great that unadulterated USB is used to connect stuff. The Blu-ray loading is WAY faster than my dedicated Sony Blu-ray player (which will go to my sister or ebay), but the picture and sound output in Blu-ray is noticeably weaker (on a Sony Bravia HDTV hooked up to a Yamaha amp and JM Lab hi-fi speakers). The buildings at the start of The Dark Knight Blu-ray shimmer amazingly on the Blu-ray player, but not so much on the PS3 Slim. The DVD upscaling also looks weaker than the old Blu-ray player. I'll cope - it all still looks great, just not quite as great, but the speed of operation and versatility of the device are a good trade-off. Oddly the CD music output from the PS3 Slim sounds better than the Blu-ray player. I lasted about 5 minutes in PS Home or whatever their online world is. That seemed awful, like they had asked EQ2 launch-era SOE for MMO advice. Messed about with real games for a while, then went to bed. Woke up and played another CD, saved it on the PS3. Part of the household now. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 04, 2009, 08:56:19 PM Have you fiddled with the video preferences yet (for blu-ray/hdmi/and video).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 04, 2009, 09:06:12 PM God I fucking hate quick time events. The developers who put those in games need to be round up and shot.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tale on September 04, 2009, 10:02:23 PM Have you fiddled with the video preferences yet (for blu-ray/hdmi/and video). Probably not enough. I looked at sound output preferences and they confused me. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 07:06:03 AM What are people using for voice chat on their PS3s? (Planning ahead for MAG :awesome_for_real:)
I'm looking at the Sony PS3 Bluetooth ear piece and the Turtle Beach P21 headphones. Any other good options out there? I tried my cell phone Bluetooth ear piece (BlueAnt Z9) but the quality wasn't so great and it doesn't have the nice features like the Sony one has (mute button, in-game viewing of settings, etc.). The TB headphones worry me cause I have a fat head and I'm not sure they would fit especially since I wear glasses and circumaural ear pieces tend to press the ear stems painfully into my head but I like how you get game sound and voice sound from just the headphones (which is what I'm used to on my PC) rather than having two separate audio sources. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 09, 2009, 07:07:23 AM I'm using the blue-tooth ear bud that came with warhawk.
EDIT: looked it up, Jabra BT125 BlueTooth Headset Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 07:09:46 AM Edit: Does the Jabra have a mute button?
Does it look like this guy? PlayStation 3 Bluetooth Headset (http://www.amazon.com/PlayStation-3-Bluetooth-Headset/dp/B001BR95PW/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1252499658&sr=1-9) I know SOCOM and EndWar are bundled with the above but I'm not sure which model Warhawk comes with. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 09, 2009, 07:17:05 AM (Some of) The warhawk box(s) comes with this one: Jabra BT125 (http://reviews.cnet.com/headsets/jabra-bt125/4505-13831_7-32117555.html)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 07:18:55 AM Do any of the buttons on the Jabra work in-game as a mic mute button?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 09, 2009, 08:03:25 AM Do any of the buttons on the Jabra work in-game as a mic mute button? That i do not know, honestly I dont have many hours using it, but you asked what we would be using. Never needed to mute the mic, best I can do is look for the manual when I get home for you. I think schild has this model as well, maybe he knows more. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 08:09:46 AM There's probably some way but it's not always convenient (on the Z9 you have to hold the Vol- button for 3 seconds) and I'm just used to muting things on my cell phone itself. The Sony model is nice cause it has a nice big honking mute button right on the front (side) of it.
The reason why I'm asking is I have year around allergies so I don't thinking you guys want to hear me constantly blowing my nose into the mic :uhrr: :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 09, 2009, 08:12:38 AM The reason why I'm asking is I have year around allergies so I don't thinking you guys want to hear me constantly blowing my nose into the mic :uhrr: :awesome_for_real: yeahhhh dont do that. :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 09, 2009, 09:34:07 AM Okay, I bought an old style 80GB PS3 on Sunday, and I'm just not feeling the love. I bought Infamous, Little Big Planet, and Uncharted for it, and the only game there that really struck me as concentrated awesome was Uncharted. I hate the way the controllers feel (I understand that that's probably just because I'm so used to the 360), particularly how twitchy the analog sticks are; they're just way too sensitive for me. Needless to say, I've got the buyer's remorse real bad and will be taking it back today. If this were my only console I'd be quite happy with it, but considering that I already own a 360, the exclusives for the PS3 just aren't good enough to justify owning both.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 09:35:05 AM What didn't you like about Infamous?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 09:37:03 AM So get rid of the 360. The on exclusives there are Forza and Halo. Nothing else is even worth mentioning.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 09, 2009, 09:38:48 AM So get rid of the 360. The on exclusives there are Forza and Halo. Nothing else is even worth mentioning. I can return the PS3 for the full value of it. I can sell the 360 for what, $50 at PawnStop? I also own something like 20 games for the 360. Why would I ditch a platform I'm already heavily invested in for one that I'm not all that happy with? Quote What didn't you like about Infamous? It's not that I didn't like it, it's a decent game. If it were out for the 360 I'd proudly own that copy. It's not worth owning a new system, though. I'd call it a B+ game.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 09:39:48 AM Culdcept Saga.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 09:40:02 AM So get rid of the 360. The on exclusives there are Forza and Halo. Nothing else is even worth mentioning. I can return the PS3 for the full value of it. I can sell the 360 for what, $50 at PawnStop? I also own something like 20 games for the 360. Why would I ditch a platform I'm already heavily invested in for one that I'm not all that happy with? HAHAHAHAHA. No, seriously. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 09, 2009, 09:43:05 AM Demon's Souls. HAHAHAHAHA. No, seriously. Looks good. $300 good? I have my doubts. Be honest with me, how Japanese is it? I realize it's dark fantasy, but it was also made in Japan by Japanese people, which means I'll probably hate the damn thing if past history is at all reliable. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 09:43:58 AM I'll let everyone else answer since I can't be trusted.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 09:45:00 AM No you can't :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 10:00:16 AM I didn't detect any weeaboo in Demon's Souls, but I might not be trustable either. It's probably too hard for you, though.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 09, 2009, 10:07:20 AM It's probably too hard for you, though. 'Nuff said. I don't react well to frustration. I like my fun tubes heavily greased, thankyouverymuch. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 10:14:32 AM It's a great game, but the fact that you will die in the intro might irritate you. It's one of those games where the player has to skill up to get anywhere. I'm all about fun these days, and even fishing in Animal Crossing stresses me out.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 10:15:32 AM Even if you don't die in the intro, a dragon punches you in the face and kills you to make sure you die.
It's pretty much the game I use to define whether people game for fun or game as a cathartic hobby these days. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 09, 2009, 10:19:47 AM Even if you don't die in the intro, a dragon punches you in the face and kills you to make sure you die. Of all the millions of crazy things you've said about the game, this one has probably guaranteed my purchase. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 10:24:06 AM You know, the things he says about the game are not actually crazy. He does froth a lot but he keeps to the facts.
I'm saving this game for when I don't have a job. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 09, 2009, 10:25:49 AM Heh, I played Dragon Souls for about 30 minutes yesterday after not playing for months. Got stomped repeatedly. It really is a game that you get drastically better at the more you play.
Unfortunately the baby woke up and I had to leave a corpse with 5000 or so souls on it. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 09, 2009, 10:31:41 AM You know, the things he says about the game are not actually crazy. He does froth a lot but he keeps to the facts. I'm going to second this, nothing on here has been a lie or over exaggerated. The game is truly phenominal and you only die because you suck. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 09, 2009, 10:35:53 AM I dont think I would take back the ps3, mostly, because I think that felling you have, is the 360 huge slow ass controller withdraw.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 09, 2009, 10:38:18 AM I dont think I would take back the ps3, mostly, because I think that felling you have, is the 360 huge slow ass controller withdraw. Getting ready to go right now. Honestly, there's one exclusive game that I bought that was fantastic, and that was Uncharted. Unfortunately it's not exactly a game with shitloads of replayability. Sorry, but $300 for one really fantastic game isn't worth it to me. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 09, 2009, 10:39:31 AM You're more of a Madden/Halo type anyhow. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 10:41:14 AM Heh, I played Dragon Souls for about 30 minutes yesterday after not playing for months. Got stomped repeatedly. It really is a game that you get drastically better at the more you play. Unfortunately the baby woke up and I had to leave a corpse with 5000 or so souls on it. :awesome_for_real: This is the main reason I don't boot it up now. I'd like to make some progress but I know that I'll just spend hours trying to not die in the beginning area. No, not right now. I dont think I would take back the ps3, mostly, because I think that felling you have, is the 360 huge slow ass controller withdraw. I was thinking the same thing. Untraining yourself from the 360 controller might be hard. Usually there are sliders to change stick sensitivity in game options, so I was thinking it must be the stick placement, grip size and convex caps. I'd also like to ask BG what was wrong with inFamous? Not that it matters, just curious. As for $300 for a console, I suppose you have to consider how many times you are expected to pony up for a replacement. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 10:42:19 AM I don't think it's worth trying to convince him otherwise. He's going to end up buying it again after reams and reams of shit comes out for it, but we can just wait til that happens to post nelson_haha.gif.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 10:43:23 AM It's a toss up between that and his next RROD.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 09, 2009, 11:34:10 AM Unfortunately the baby woke up and I had to leave a corpse with 5000 or so souls on it. :awesome_for_real: :ye_gods: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 11:40:05 AM Bah, I've left that much and more laying around and can't blame anyone except myself: couldn't get back to where I died.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 09, 2009, 11:43:09 AM :oh_i_see:
I'll try again. Unfortunately the baby woke up and I had to leave a corpse ... Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 11:47:11 AM :facepalm:
When you start talking about something other than games, I can be slow to notice. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 09, 2009, 11:58:18 AM I can assure you there was no infanticide. I thought I was being rather clear within the whole new father/Demon's Souls framework. :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 09, 2009, 12:04:45 PM I dont think I would take back the ps3, mostly, because I think that felling you have, is the 360 huge slow ass controller withdraw. Getting ready to go right now. Honestly, there's one exclusive game that I bought that was fantastic, and that was Uncharted. Unfortunately it's not exactly a game with shitloads of replayability. Sorry, but $300 for one really fantastic game isn't worth it to me. I could have sworn there were more games than three on the PS3. :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 12:18:58 PM Not sure about more than three exclusives, but I haven't paid much attention since I decided to buy everything on PS3 from now on.
Let's see, there's Demon's Souls, Disgaea 3, some Bluray variant of any God of War, Gran Turismo 5 (whenever that materializes), infamous (apparently subject to opinion), LittleBigPlanet (YMMFVAL), Metal Gear Solid 4, ModNation Racers (next year), Ratchet & Clank Future series, Siren: Blood Curse (if you like that sort of thing), Uncharted 1+2 (I have confidence), and Valkyria Chronicles. I don't know if White Knight Chronicles (early 2010) will be any good, but hey, Level 5. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 12:29:02 PM schild's recommendations are on the Wiki:
http://wiki.f13.net/index.php/Recommendations:_PS3_%26_PSN Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 12:37:14 PM He doesn't have Ratchet & Clank so his relevancy is called into question.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on September 09, 2009, 01:07:18 PM Just found out the other night that the last GT5:Prologue patch ate my saved file :uhrr:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 09, 2009, 01:19:12 PM He doesn't have Ratchet & Clank so his relevancy is called into question. Especially since he has Dynasty Warriors: Gundam, and Heavenly Sword on there. Maybe that acceptable back when the PS3 was new and there still weren't a lot of games out, but I can't imagine recommending those to anybody now. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 09, 2009, 01:22:19 PM I don't think it's worth trying to convince him otherwise. He's going to end up buying it again after reams and reams of shit comes out for it, but we can just wait til that happens to post nelson_haha.gif. Why? If and when they've got more games that I actually want then I'll buy the system again. What, do you think the system will get more expensive by then? What exactly have I lost? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on September 09, 2009, 02:22:01 PM I find the 360's sticks superior as well, but the PS3 controller is a better general purpose controller.
Either way, I only paid under $250, so I'm satisfied. I'll probably trade up to the Slim at some point, but no rush. Uncharted, Infamous, and Disgaea 3 were worth the purchase, and Sony's E3 showing is what made me take the plunge anyways. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 09, 2009, 03:08:11 PM I didn't detect any weeaboo in Demon's Souls, but I might not be trustable either. It's probably too hard for you, though. Heh, ate lunch with one of the few "gamer" types at work. When I said the game was from Japan, he immediately started in with the JRPG cliche critiques. Then when I said it was hard, and explained some of the difficulty, he immediately dismissed it. When I said it was difficult, but you get better and really get into it, he dismissed that as well. People don't want to get better at games any more, I think they expect Fable 2/Halo level of difficulty so they can feel good about trouncing shit AI and uninspired level design. If I can tollerate it, it really isn't that bad. I couldn't even finish Super Mario Galaxy, which both my brother-in-law and 11 year old nephew manged to (last level frustrated me a bit too much). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 03:09:17 PM He doesn't have Ratchet & Clank so his relevancy is called into question. Especially since he has Dynasty Warriors: Gundam, and Heavenly Sword on there. Maybe that acceptable back when the PS3 was new and there still weren't a lot of games out, but I can't imagine recommending those to anybody now.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 09, 2009, 03:12:56 PM He doesn't have Ratchet & Clank so his relevancy is called into question. Especially since he has Dynasty Warriors: Gundam, and Heavenly Sword on there. Maybe that acceptable back when the PS3 was new and there still weren't a lot of games out, but I can't imagine recommending those to anybody now.Would you really recommend either of those games to anybody at this point? Especially considering Heavenly Sword is still pretty much full price at places like Amazon? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 03:14:04 PM Heavenly Sword? Sure. I would. I enjoyed the shit out of it. Genji 2 though? Not so much. Lair? Not so much. Dynasty Warriors Gundam? Sure, 1 or 2. But I'd say they're both cheating bastards of games and overly hard unless you start at a lower difficulty.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ard on September 09, 2009, 03:14:11 PM Fuck you, I liked Lair.
I'd also recommend Heavenly Sword to people, so my taste might be in question. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 03:15:50 PM Fuck you, I liked Lair. Your taste is far more in question due to Lair than Heavenly Sword.I'd also recommend Heavenly Sword to people, so my taste might be in question. Heavenly Sword is worth playing just for the voice-acting of the "bad guys" if nothing else. Also, they did a nice job with her hair (most of the time). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on September 09, 2009, 03:20:52 PM Also, they did a nice job with her hair (most of the time). That is exactly what I look for in a game! Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 03:34:32 PM That was a not so veiled jab at the thread that is currently about hair.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Riggswolfe on September 09, 2009, 03:52:14 PM Not sure about more than three exclusives, but I haven't paid much attention since I decided to buy everything on PS3 from now on. You know, I'm almost the exact opposite. Especially because when I read review sites that do a head to head I almost always see something like "oddly, the PS3 version had more slowdown/graphical issues/other technical bugs than the 360 version." I just finally decided that for whatever reasons alot of devs have more problems with the PS3. I suspect it's something akin to the issues the Sega Saturn had: the architecture is just hard to program for. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 09, 2009, 04:17:58 PM Hmmm, shit. I just realized: The PS3 Slim doesn't come with an HDMI cable, does it?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 09, 2009, 04:19:14 PM Hmmm, shit. I just realized: The PS3 Slim doesn't come with an HDMI cable, does it? $10 with shipping from newegg. I think my PS3 only came with a composite cable. I happen to use my 360 elite cable for mine. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 09, 2009, 04:26:46 PM Yeah, its just that it was one more thing to order that I forgot to.
But now I realize its probably a moot point, as my monitor came with an HDMI cable I'm not using. So hurray! Only thing left to worry about when it finally arrives is how to plug it into my computer speakers. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 04:30:16 PM The Slim only comes with an AV cable with composite and stereo outputs (RCA jacks).
Only thing left to worry about when it finally arrives is how to plug it into my computer speakers. If your computer speakers accept stereo RCA inputs then you don't need anything extra. You will need to change the Sound Settings so sound is coming out of the AV Multi connector rather than the HDMI port (or you can have sound coming out of both if you want on the Slim).If your computer speakers only accept an 1/8" stereo mini jack you'll want something like this thingy (http://www.amazon.com/3-5MM-Stereo-Male-Female-inch/dp/B0016LC5VY/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=musical-instruments&qid=1252536214&sr=8-2). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 09, 2009, 04:34:37 PM Fuck you, I liked Lair. Your taste is far more in question due to Lair than Heavenly Sword.I'd also recommend Heavenly Sword to people, so my taste might be in question. Heavenly Sword is worth playing just for the voice-acting of the "bad guys" if nothing else. Also, they did a nice job with her hair (most of the time). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 09, 2009, 05:49:56 PM Not sure about more than three exclusives, but I haven't paid much attention since I decided to buy everything on PS3 from now on. You know, I'm almost the exact opposite. Especially because when I read review sites that do a head to head I almost always see something like "oddly, the PS3 version had more slowdown/graphical issues/other technical bugs than the 360 version." I just finally decided that for whatever reasons alot of devs have more problems with the PS3. I suspect it's something akin to the issues the Sega Saturn had: the architecture is just hard to program for. Ah, then I know why we are opposites. If I want a game and it is available on PS3 and 360, I get it on PS3 because of the 360 console itself being garbagy. It's like an outboard motor with advertisements that locks up after long periods of not saving, plus it has Miis on it and doesn't like static IP addresses. Although it hasn't locked up with Last Remnant for some reason, probably because I can save anywhere. That game has terrible performance anyway, probably for the best that Squeenix couldn't get Unreal Engine to work on PS3. The PS3 has been out long enough that I'm hoping the learning curve is mostly done. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 09, 2009, 08:31:50 PM I'm at the point where I'm starting to consider where games are superior on the PS3 over the 360. - I've held off buying Arkham Asylum until I get a PS3 because of the big chunks of exclusive DLC.
I perfer the 360 in general, but paying for Live isn't attractive, nor is the limited storage space. Especially with the 120gb HDD limit compared to unlimited for the PS3, and the fact that I have a bunch of music games on 360 that are the things that suck up all the HDD space.. :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 09, 2009, 09:55:43 PM Fuck you, I liked Lair. Your taste is far more in question due to Lair than Heavenly Sword.I'd also recommend Heavenly Sword to people, so my taste might be in question. Heavenly Sword is worth playing just for the voice-acting of the "bad guys" if nothing else. Also, they did a nice job with her hair (most of the time). Also, you can turn off the after touch shit and just control that stuff manually. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on September 09, 2009, 11:16:01 PM Maybe the acting is a love or hate thing. :grin: I thought the whole game was pretty good and underrated.. Probably selling at a cheap price these days to boot.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 09, 2009, 11:32:18 PM it's one I plan to pick up on the cheap. Now if only I could find that thread where we discussed the best games to pick up for a PS3, I could plan my software pre-purchases... :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 10, 2009, 02:35:30 AM Maybe the acting is a love or hate thing. :grin: I thought the whole game was pretty good and underrated.. Probably selling at a cheap price these days to boot. Maybe if you buy it from a 3rd party seller on amazon or something. Don't think it's even in print anymore but amazon is selling it for about $50 still with 4 left in stock. EB doesn't have it available online but lists it for $50 as well. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 10, 2009, 02:42:18 AM I bought my copy through Amazon from a 3rd party.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 10, 2009, 02:48:12 AM Given the length of the game, I think it would probably be better to rent rather than purchase.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 10, 2009, 07:59:42 AM it's one I plan to pick up on the cheap. Now if only I could find that thread where we discussed the best games to pick up for a PS3, I could plan my software pre-purchases... :why_so_serious: The two I found helpful when picking up my ps3 were this one (http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=15953.0) and the F13 wiki suggestions (http://wiki.f13.net/index.php/Recommendations:_PS3_%26_PSN). It just seems the suggestions list isn't updated with any 2009 games though. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 10, 2009, 08:14:01 AM For 2009 so far, there's Arkham Asylum and inFamous. I'd add Prototype if you liked Crackdown or the good Hulk game, it's good fun.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 10, 2009, 08:19:03 AM UFC 2009 (cross platform) was pretty decent as well. Sunk a lot of hours into that.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 10, 2009, 08:25:24 AM For PSN downloads, Fat Princess. At $15 I don't see how that isn't worth mentioning as a must have.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 10, 2009, 08:40:11 AM If you like console shooters (LOL) there's Killzone 2 as a PS3 exclusive from this year as well. It has very nice visuals but the actual gameplay, while very polished, is nothing special, at least as far as I've played through so far. Haven't tried MP yet (I suck at console shooters).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Big Gulp on September 10, 2009, 08:54:41 AM If you like console shooters (LOL) there's Killzone 2 as a PS3 exclusive from this year as well. It has very nice visuals but the actual gameplay, while very polished, is nothing special, at least as far as I've played through so far. Haven't tried MP yet (I suck at console shooters). My biggest gripe with Infamous was the lack of aim assist. There's already too much shooting in that game, and without an aim assist I'm not just not going to be bothered to play it with analog sticks. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stu on September 10, 2009, 09:06:25 AM Two months now and I still can't stop playing as Destructoid on Bomberman Ultra with my roomies. Fun game.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ard on September 10, 2009, 10:51:12 AM If you like console shooters (LOL) there's Killzone 2 as a PS3 exclusive from this year as well. There's also Resistance 2, although it was technically from the very end of last year. I still vastly prefer it's coop mode to anything else I've seen. Haven't mucked around with it's competitive mode though. It's weapons are a lot more fun than killzone's. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 10, 2009, 01:59:37 PM The Slim only comes with an AV cable with composite and stereo outputs (RCA jacks). Awesome! Thanks for the tips. I'm actually a complete noob when it comes to sound and video wiring. Perhaps you (or anybody else) could help me out here. This is the situation.Only thing left to worry about when it finally arrives is how to plug it into my computer speakers. If your computer speakers accept stereo RCA inputs then you don't need anything extra. You will need to change the Sound Settings so sound is coming out of the AV Multi connector rather than the HDMI port (or you can have sound coming out of both if you want on the Slim).If your computer speakers only accept an 1/8" stereo mini jack you'll want something like this thingy (http://www.amazon.com/3-5MM-Stereo-Male-Female-inch/dp/B0016LC5VY/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=musical-instruments&qid=1252536214&sr=8-2). Heres my speakers: (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/41488/speakersmain.jpg) Green and Pink cords plug into my PC. There is one jack on the sub where the cord for the speakers plugs into. The little circle disk thing is the volume control, and contains the only jacks I can find for plugging anything else into. These jacks are for the microphone and headphones. (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/41488/speakersdial.jpg) So, what would I need to do? Would I have to run the converter thing you linked into something like the microphone jack? Run the PS3 cables through some other weird splitter converter thing so the green/pink cords are shared between both the PC And PS3? I'm rather lost. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Phire on September 10, 2009, 02:15:16 PM Maybe the acting is a love or hate thing. :grin: I thought the whole game was pretty good and underrated.. Probably selling at a cheap price these days to boot. I hated the acting and voices in Heavenly Sword. They were so over the top and silly that it would have ruined the game if the rest hadn't been equally as bad... Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tairnyn on September 10, 2009, 02:51:14 PM For PSN downloads, Fat Princess. At $15 I don't see how that isn't worth mentioning as a must have. I considered grabbing this the other day but I'm still a bit wary. Is this the kind of MP game that can be fun to hop in a server or play for an hour or two or is the fun dependent on being lucky and getting on a good team? (or playing against a terrible one) None of my friends have a PS3 (yet!) so I hesitate to spend money on a game if 9/16ths of the fun is playing with friends. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 10, 2009, 02:59:28 PM I've had fun on crappy teams, but can't deny it's more fun with even teams or just being on the winning side. IMO though, as short as the single player mode is (1.5-2hours or so), I still think that alone was worth the $15 just due to how fun it was.
You can't go wrong when the end credits play Sir Mix A Lot, the main prince is named Prince Albert, and the biggest part of the game is playing capture the flag with a princess whom you have to fatten up so the other team needs more people to carry her. All this while chopping people's heads off :heart: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 10, 2009, 03:18:09 PM Teleku, I believe the thing we need to find out first is what sort of audio input your PC has. Could be optical or minijack. PS3 outputs optical, which I only remember because I use that, otherwise probably RCA plugs.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on September 10, 2009, 04:04:29 PM Is [Fat Princess] the kind of MP game that can be fun to hop in a server or play for an hour or two or is the fun dependent on being lucky and getting on a good team? (or playing against a terrible one) The fun in multiplayer Fat Princess comes from any form of successful teamwork. Every team will have at least one non-idiot player. Pick a complimentary class and stick with the non-idiot(s) and you will have fun. But you will see the occasional player who decides to help "defend" by repeatedly throwing big bombs around your castle, blowing up your teammates and gates, with no attacker in sight. If you don't want multiplayer then instead of Fat Princess with bots I suggest Flower. I was not sure about zooming flower petals around but its good. Plus it has more immersive and intuitive motion controls than any non-Wii Sports game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 10, 2009, 04:31:17 PM Teleku, I believe the thing we need to find out first is what sort of audio input your PC has. Could be optical or minijack. PS3 outputs optical, which I only remember because I use that, otherwise probably RCA plugs. Well, heres the back of my motherboard (an Asus P6T):(http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/41488/p6tmotherboard.jpg) I use the onboard sound card, which has the standard 6 audio connectors (what ever type of jack those are). I just realized looking through the specs, however, that I have 1 S/PDIF Optical jack also. Which I've never even bothered figuring out WTF it did, but am now reading is for optical sound. So, yah me? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 10, 2009, 05:16:51 PM Maybe the acting is a love or hate thing. :grin: I thought the whole game was pretty good and underrated.. Probably selling at a cheap price these days to boot. I hated the acting and voices in Heavenly Sword. They were so over the top and silly that it would have ruined the game if the rest hadn't been equally as bad...Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 10, 2009, 05:29:32 PM Don't let things like "they were supposed to be over-the-top and silly" get in the way of complaining about it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 10, 2009, 07:53:19 PM If you like console shooters (LOL) there's Killzone 2 as a PS3 exclusive from this year as well. It has very nice visuals but the actual gameplay, while very polished, is nothing special, at least as far as I've played through so far. Haven't tried MP yet (I suck at console shooters). My biggest gripe with Infamous was the lack of aim assist. There's already too much shooting in that game, and without an aim assist I'm not just not going to be bothered to play it with analog sticks.The first shooter I tried was Uncharted and I sucked so bad at it I had to melee all the enemies in the very first scene. Tried Killzone 2 and I could barely hit stuff there. Finally switched to Infamous and did fine there once I learned you could escape via the rooftops and your basic attack has pretty decent range for sniping enemies on the roofs. Then when I switched back to Uncharted I found I wasn't so sucky at shooting anymore (it's still painful compared to using a mouse, of course). If you ever do get a PS3 again and play Infamous I recommend you give the "escape to a rooftop" strategy a try anytime you engage more than 1 or 2 enemies on the ground until you get good enough with thumbstick aiming. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 10, 2009, 07:57:42 PM Teleku, I believe the thing we need to find out first is what sort of audio input your PC has. Could be optical or minijack. PS3 outputs optical, which I only remember because I use that, otherwise probably RCA plugs. Well, heres the back of my motherboard (an Asus P6T):(http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/41488/p6tmotherboard.jpg) I use the onboard sound card, which has the standard 6 audio connectors (what ever type of jack those are). I just realized looking through the specs, however, that I have 1 S/PDIF Optical jack also. Which I've never even bothered figuring out WTF it did, but am now reading is for optical sound. So, yah me? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 10, 2009, 08:03:56 PM For PSN downloads, Fat Princess. At $15 I don't see how that isn't worth mentioning as a must have. I considered grabbing this the other day but I'm still a bit wary. Is this the kind of MP game that can be fun to hop in a server or play for an hour or two or is the fun dependent on being lucky and getting on a good team? (or playing against a terrible one) None of my friends have a PS3 (yet!) so I hesitate to spend money on a game if 9/16ths of the fun is playing with friends.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ard on September 10, 2009, 08:49:32 PM I tend to just search for deathmatch or tower games, to avoid that problem. Capture the flag in ANY online game tends to breakdown into retardation.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 10, 2009, 11:39:06 PM Welp. Ordered my first PS3 games last night from a super-cheap place in the UK. Should be here next week. I figure I'll get a handful (5-10) of cheap but good games in advance of the console itself, so I don't have a PS3 and like one thing to play on it.
Heavenly Sword and Motorstorm. I would have gotten Uncharted as well, but they were out of stock. So I'll get it in a few weeks. Maybe Overlord as well, since to buy the PS3 game with DLC included, new from the UK costs about AU$4 more than buying the DLC pack for 360, and doesn't take up HDD space. When Demons Souls comes out in the US, I'll see if any kind F13er wants to pick it up for me from whoever is selling it cheap, and if not, I'll wait until the play-asia price drops a bit. (No Euro or AU release on the cards, you see). Don't want to get too much, since I'll no doubt be buying a Christmas bundle that has a few games attached. Infamous when the price drops a bit, Arkham I'll buy at the same time as the PS3, Prototype when the price drops a bit (on whichever of the 2 platforms). UFC I'll wait until the next one, which will no doubt be much improved. I liked the demo, I can just see that the followup will have a lot of stuff fixed, and it's only about 8-10 months away (with plenty of other stuff to play, see above). WTF is Fat Princess? Oh, I know Schild is a SingStar fan - what are those games actually like? As unmanly as it is, my wife and I enjoy playing these games together (GH, Lips, RB, etc). From what I understand, Singstar is like Lips, only vastly superior. What's it like? (yeah I know, I have read wikipedia - but I want to know what humans think as well). Resistance and the other one (Killzone??) - both FPS and no 3PS option? For some reason I can handle 3rd person console shooters but not FPS. Do Warhawk or Valkyria Chronicles have a demo? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on September 10, 2009, 11:44:03 PM Do Warhawk or Valkyria Chronicles have a demo? Valkyria Chronicles *had* a demo on the PSN unsure if its still there. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on September 10, 2009, 11:44:41 PM What's cool about Valkyria Chronicles is that you don't need a demo. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 11, 2009, 12:01:01 AM Thanks for all the help Trippy!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 11, 2009, 12:46:21 AM What's cool about Valkyria Chronicles is that you don't need a demo. :awesome_for_real: Because you're sending me a copy for free? :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 11, 2009, 01:14:25 AM The first shooter I tried was Uncharted and I sucked so bad at it I had to melee all the enemies in the very first scene. Did you ever figure out that just shooting from the hip autoaims? :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 11, 2009, 02:59:17 AM Resistance and the other one (Killzone??) - both FPS and no 3PS option? For some reason I can handle 3rd person console shooters but not FPS. Both are first-person only (barring where you are controlling vehicles and such).Quote Do Warhawk or Valkyria Chronicles have a demo? Yes. The PlayStation Store has a lot of PS3 demos available. They tend to be quite large (usually > 1 GB each), though.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 11, 2009, 03:09:37 AM The first shooter I tried was Uncharted and I sucked so bad at it I had to melee all the enemies in the very first scene. Did you ever figure out that just shooting from the hip autoaims? :grin:Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 11, 2009, 04:46:51 AM Both are first-person only (barring where you are controlling vehicles and such). Yes. The PlayStation Store has a lot of PS3 demos available. They tend to be quite large (usually > 1 GB each), though. Thank you and thank you. I'll skip the shooters and pick up both demos before popping for the games. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 11, 2009, 06:56:21 AM PS3 hardware question:
Friend of mine comes over once a week with some movies and or videos on a external hard drive. I had been streaming the nights entertainment from my PC using azures (i could never get that PS3 server program to work...ever.) So, last night we tried to hook up the drive directly as the ps3 is currently running on wireless because i have/do not want to take a cable from the back of my apartment to the front. Anyway. It did not see the drive. I read it needs to be a fat32 formatted drive to be seen (and of course, its not). SO, we tried a thumb drive, the machine recognized just fine, but said there were no videos present, i assume this is format or codex issue (something i guess the azures was fixing?). Other than that, I'm not sure whats up/wrong. Anyone have any experiences reading videos and movies in data form off external drives or thumbs? Tips, considerations, rules of note? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Riggswolfe on September 11, 2009, 07:16:53 AM Ah, then I know why we are opposites. If I want a game and it is available on PS3 and 360, I get it on PS3 because of the 360 console itself being garbagy. It's like an outboard motor with advertisements that locks up after long periods of not saving, plus it has Miis on it and doesn't like static IP addresses. Although it hasn't locked up with Last Remnant for some reason, probably because I can save anywhere. That game has terrible performance anyway, probably for the best that Squeenix couldn't get Unreal Engine to work on PS3. The PS3 has been out long enough that I'm hoping the learning curve is mostly done. To your last point, I still see those kinds of things to this day. Usually, all I buy for the PS3 are its exclusives with rare exceptions where the PS3 gets a better "extra". Like Soul Calibur 4. If I had to have a Star Wars character in my Soul Calibur I much preferred Vader. As for your main point, I'm one of those weird people who has had zero problems with his 360. I'm an odd statistical anomaly. I got my 360 a couple of months after launch, when they were still new enough that you had to get there early and get in a line to get one. I got the next to last one that day. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 11, 2009, 07:23:37 AM It did not see the drive. I read it needs to be a fat32 formatted drive to be seen (and of course, its not). SO, we tried a thumb drive, the machine recognized just fine, but said there were no videos present, i assume this is format or codex issue (something i guess the azures was fixing?). Other than that, I'm not sure whats up/wrong. Make a directory called "VIDEO" at the root directory. Then put whatever videos in there. You can make subfolders in there if you like as well. There may be issues with the container format and codecs if you try and play them straight from the PS3 rather than streaming it through a media server. H.264/AAC in an MP4 container is the preferred combination but it does support a few other formats:Anyone have any experiences reading videos and movies in data form off external drives or thumbs? Tips, considerations, rules of note? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_system_software Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 11, 2009, 07:35:02 AM Odd, it says AVI, we had AVI on the thumb, but not in the VIDEO folder. Persnickety thing.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 11, 2009, 07:38:31 AM It supports AVI as a container but it only supports a small subset of the possible codecs that can be within it. Xvid/Divx + MP3 works fine, though.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 11, 2009, 09:28:30 AM WTF is Fat Princess? Fat Princess is a download-only, top-down, capture-the-flag multiplayer game. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAhRZVT7P0w Also, when you get your PS3 connected, go cruising through PSN for a little while. The 3.00 firmware makes it kinda hard to avoid PSN now, but that's OK because it is very nice. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 11, 2009, 11:56:03 AM So is there anything else I should be aware of other than Fat Princess that isn't on the PS3 recommendation list (why isn't it on btw, heard lots of great things about it)? List looks pretty solid for all the top games worth playing.
Though I've just noticed that the Playstation section lacks Final Fantasy Tactics. Where does one submit recommendations for the wiki so that I can fix this horribly horrible over site? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 11, 2009, 11:58:24 AM So is there anything else I should be aware of other than Fat Princess that isn't on the PS3 recommendation list (why isn't it on btw, heard lots of great things about it)? List looks pretty solid for all the top games worth playing. I think the recommendations are very disc-centric, which is why I suggested browsing PSN. Though I've just noticed that the Playstation section lacks Final Fantasy Tactics. Where does one submit recommendations for the wiki so that I can fix this horribly horrible over site? Oversight. Also, NiX is in charge of the wiki. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 11, 2009, 03:55:45 PM So is there anything else I should be aware of other than Fat Princess that isn't on the PS3 recommendation list (why isn't it on btw, heard lots of great things about it)? List looks pretty solid for all the top games worth playing. I think the recommendations are very disc-centric, which is why I suggested browsing PSN.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 12, 2009, 01:03:32 AM The #10 Top Download on the PlayStation Store at the moment is "Bat Country" :awesome_for_real:
(It's a Rockband song by Avenged Sevenfold) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 13, 2009, 01:50:55 AM What's cool about Valkyria Chronicles is that you don't need a demo. :awesome_for_real: Also, Walmart is selling it for $20 (sold out online though, and not sure if this is a permanent price). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on September 13, 2009, 05:25:10 PM What's cool about Valkyria Chronicles is that you don't need a demo. :awesome_for_real: Also, Walmart is selling it for $20 (sold out online though, and not sure if this is a permanent price). Thanks for the tip on that. It's one that was on my list but couldn't justify the $40 with at least two full price games next month. Picked it up, but had to wade through gaggles of trailer trash to get there. Likely would have been better to just pay the $40. :) That's only the second thing I've bought in my life at Walmart. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 14, 2009, 12:20:20 AM Also, Walmart is selling it for $20 (sold out online though, and not sure if this is a permanent price). Thanks for that heads up, there's a few people I wanted to send this to this holiday season so this will be great to order from. Picked it up, but had to wade through gaggles of trailer trash to get there. Likely would have been better to just pay the $40. :) That's only the second thing I've bought in my life at Walmart. Walmart Bingo (http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k46/revritter/Wal-martBingo-1.jpg) makes those trips much easier to deal with Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 14, 2009, 01:10:47 AM Ok then Mr Art snob types, then you find me some good art to use. Put your mouse clicks where yer mouths are then. I am open to suggestions. Constructive ones. I know, that's HARD and all, but why not try it on for size? Its amazing what it can accomplish. How'd you go with that, by the way? You got suggestions from both of us a week or more ago now. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 16, 2009, 12:54:47 PM Dammit! I was registering my name with PSN, was almost through, then it suddenly said connection to the host timed out. Had to restart again, but now its saying I can't use my username. Can't log in with it either, so apparently its now lost in limbo land. Damn you again Sony!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on September 16, 2009, 03:03:03 PM Dammit! I was registering my name with PSN, was almost through, then it suddenly said connection to the host timed out. Had to restart again, but now its saying I can't use my username. Can't log in with it either, so apparently its now lost in limbo land. Damn you again Sony! So you tried registering on your PS3? I had to stop part way through my registration but I did it on my computer and picked up where I left off without a problem. Try https://store.playstation.com/login.gvm Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 16, 2009, 04:54:23 PM What's this threads power level sir?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 16, 2009, 04:58:13 PM (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/39720/f13/ps3_power_level.png)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Lounge on September 16, 2009, 05:58:31 PM It did not see the drive. I read it needs to be a fat32 formatted drive to be seen (and of course, its not). SO, we tried a thumb drive, the machine recognized just fine, but said there were no videos present, i assume this is format or codex issue (something i guess the azures was fixing?). Other than that, I'm not sure whats up/wrong. Make a directory called "VIDEO" at the root directory. Then put whatever videos in there. You can make subfolders in there if you like as well. There may be issues with the container format and codecs if you try and play them straight from the PS3 rather than streaming it through a media server. H.264/AAC in an MP4 container is the preferred combination but it does support a few other formats:Anyone have any experiences reading videos and movies in data form off external drives or thumbs? Tips, considerations, rules of note? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_system_software You can also hit the triangle button with the drive selected on the movies part of the XMB. There's a show all or something similarly named that will show you everything on the drive and not just what is in the VIDEO folder. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 16, 2009, 06:41:43 PM (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/39720/f13/ps3_power_level.png) That makes sense. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 16, 2009, 07:27:42 PM Dammit! I was registering my name with PSN, was almost through, then it suddenly said connection to the host timed out. Had to restart again, but now its saying I can't use my username. Can't log in with it either, so apparently its now lost in limbo land. Damn you again Sony! So you tried registering on your PS3? I had to stop part way through my registration but I did it on my computer and picked up where I left off without a problem. Try https://store.playstation.com/login.gvm Really digging the PS3. PSN is really nice, love the functionality of the system, the built in wireless for everything is great, and graphics look awesome on my HD monitor. Odd considering how much I was bashing the PS3 when it came out, but now they've finally improved enough to draw me in. Except, of course, this brand new most updated slim version I bought doesn't play fucking PS2 games, but it wouldn't be Sony if they didn't fuck me somehow. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 07:47:04 AM Odd considering how much I was bashing the PS3 when it came out, but now they've finally improved enough to draw me in. You mean it's cheaper, right? Except, of course, this brand new most updated slim version I bought doesn't play fucking PS2 games, but it wouldn't be Sony if they didn't fuck me somehow. /nelsonmuntz Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 17, 2009, 08:09:31 AM Yea, I'm not really sure what he means by changed, since none of that stuff he listed has had a substantial change that he would know about, if at all. Even the PSN changes have been incremental and frankly there wasn't a problem with it at launch.
So, yea, it's cheaper. That's all they changed. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 09:00:45 AM They also striped out a lot of shit without adding anything... but I guess that's what he meant: cheaper.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 17, 2009, 09:29:54 AM Here's a really stupid question for you guys. Assuming that converting the power isn't a problem, what is preventing taking a North American PS3 and hooking it up to an HD television in Europe? Same question for a 360, while we're at it.
I mean, logically I cannot see why resolution would be an issue, because it isn't like we're talking about PAL vs NTSC resolution differences (720p is 720p, no?). And the region coding (which isn't a problem for the PS3 anyway) would be between the game and the machine, not the machine and the TV. Or am I way off? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 17, 2009, 10:18:13 AM Sorry, changed was to strong of a word. I just meant to say that they finally got it at a decent price point (matched with the 120 gig HD), while finally building up a big enough library of games to get me to commit. There was practically no reason to own one the first couple years with the library they had, especially at the price. Also, the smaller size is quite nice (old PS3 was god damn huge).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Quinton on September 17, 2009, 11:40:43 AM 720p should be 720p the world over. Not sure about bluray regions though (they're different than DVD regions but I forget how exactly).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 11:59:42 AM The BluRay region map was posted somewhere around here. Duplicating for great justice.
(http://www.alpha-duplication.com/pages/duplication/images/blu-ray-region-map.png) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 17, 2009, 12:03:10 PM Right, I know that the region coding can prevent you from playing a North America disk on a European, but that isn't the question I am asking. What I want to know is what is stopping someone from taking a NA machine with NA disks and plugging it into a 720p European television set.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 12:29:07 PM I think 720p is 720p, like Quinton said. Let us know how it goes. :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 17, 2009, 12:36:22 PM I was hoping for a more definitive statement, Yeg. I'm asking on behalf of someone else, and I'd hate to recommend lugging a 90 pound console across the ocean for a short trip only to find that it isn't going to work.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 12:42:34 PM Well, I found
Quote Anything sold in Europe with a HD-READY logo on it, will display 1080i and 720p. at http://www.avforums.com/forums/ps3-media-streaming/477721-can-ps3-play-blu-ray-720p.htmlTitle: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 17, 2009, 12:44:49 PM Yeah, and I guess I already knew that. But is there anything else preventing this from working? I'm starting to think it's worth a shot.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 12:48:33 PM But is there anything else preventing this from working? Your recalcitrance? :why_so_serious: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Falconeer on September 17, 2009, 02:08:41 PM The BluRay region map was posted somewhere around here. Duplicating for great justice. (http://www.alpha-duplication.com/pages/duplication/images/blu-ray-region-map.png) I didn't really read this thread, just opened last page and saw this map, so ignore me if I am asking somehting that has been debated before. But.. what's with that map? I thought blurays were regionless. I bought NA games and they work on my PS3, and I recently bought a bluray movie in the States (Rocknrolla) and keeps working on my PS3. What am I missing? But since I am here, let me ask you all something very important to me and my PS3 (*summons Schild*): WERE THE HELL ARE MY BELOVED JRPGs?! I bought this console almost 3 years ago and the only JRPGs I am playing on it are PS2 ones. Yeah, Disgaea 3, Valkyria's Chronicles, and that's it. What the fuck went/is going wrong? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on September 17, 2009, 02:41:39 PM But is there anything else preventing this from working? Your recalcitrance? :why_so_serious: Zing! Again, I just don't want to be the douche that tells this guy it's going to work and then, you know, it not working. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: jth on September 17, 2009, 03:02:56 PM I thought blurays were regionless. I bought NA games and they work on my PS3, and I recently bought a bluray movie in the States (Rocknrolla) and keeps working on my PS3. What am I missing? PS3 games are region free. Blu-Ray movies are supposed to be region locked, but in reality very few of them are even if it says so in the box.But since I am here, let me ask you all something very important to me and my PS3 (*summons Schild*): WERE THE HELL ARE MY BELOVED JRPGs?! I bought this console almost 3 years ago and the only JRPGs I am playing on it are PS2 ones. Yeah, Disgaea 3, Valkyria's Chronicles, and that's it. What the fuck went/is going wrong? It really is a bit odd that at the moment XBOX360 has more JRPG's than PS3. Not that much more, but still.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 17, 2009, 03:50:20 PM Lots of blu-ray movies aren't region locked.
http://www.dtvforum.info/index.php?showtopic=50447 Or do a similar google search. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on September 17, 2009, 03:52:28 PM How about regular DVD's is it unlocked to play all regions or is there a hack to unlock it?
My wife doesn't like watching her Aussie stuff on the computer and our current DVD doesn't have a region unlock code/hack. I suppose I could just burn a region free copy on my PC but that is a pain. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: jth on September 17, 2009, 03:59:23 PM How about regular DVD's is it unlocked to play all regions or is there a hack to unlock it? Unfortunately DVD playback on PS3 is region locked, and as far as I know there's no way around it yet. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 17, 2009, 05:34:46 PM But since I am here, let me ask you all something very important to me and my PS3 (*summons Schild*): WERE THE HELL ARE MY BELOVED JRPGs?! I bought this console almost 3 years ago and the only JRPGs I am playing on it are PS2 ones. Yeah, Disgaea 3, Valkyria's Chronicles, and that's it. What the fuck went/is going wrong? Hey, could be worst. I can't even play the PS2 JRPG's on mine, so I just have to hope they eventually port them over :awesome_for_real:.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on September 17, 2009, 05:46:18 PM In other news, Final Fantasy Tactics was released on the PSN in today's update. Though they seem to have forgotten to add a speed up combat option which is going to piss me off.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 17, 2009, 05:51:46 PM Valkyria Chronicles is a PS3 game. If it makes you feel better, the 360 JRPGs are not well-liked.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 17, 2009, 06:03:57 PM Not well-liked is an understatement. They're universally bad. The Mistwalker stuff was almost passable, but not really.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Falconeer on September 17, 2009, 06:13:43 PM So, what's coming other than 3D heroes and FFXIII?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 17, 2009, 06:20:51 PM White Knight Chronicles, Star Ocean: The Fixed Version, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Last Rebellion (NISA), and I'm sure some other stuff that hasn't been announced. It's a short list compared to the PS2 though for sure.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 17, 2009, 08:42:19 PM But is there anything else preventing this from working? Your recalcitrance?:why_so_serious: Again, I just don't want to be the douche that tells this guy it's going to work and then, you know, it not working. If the display in Europe is "HD ready 1080p" then they will be fine. If it's just "HD ready" they may have to tweak a few things since the PS3 prefers to display at 1080p (though lots of games are only 720p). Also the US PS3 slim does have a universal power supply. Dunno about the older models. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 17, 2009, 11:29:38 PM OK, I'm having some issues with the wireless network. When ever I turn on Fat Princess, it informs me I need to download the 1.2 update, which is pretty small. It starts going, but always stops somewhere between 9 and 13%. It states that the PS3 was disconnected from the digital media server. I then try again, and the same thing keeps happening. This is also happening for the MAG update. I know the damn thing works with my wireless connection though, because I downloaded MAG, Mega-man 9, and Fat Princess, much larger files, with no problems or disconnects at all. But it chokes and dies every time I try to do these small updates Whats even more weird is that I tried it once, and suddenly fat princess loaded fine, not even asking for an update. I played around with it for awhile, then stopped the game. When I tried to load it again, I'm back to the ever failing update again.
Uh, anybody have any ideas? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on September 17, 2009, 11:57:11 PM OK, I'm having some issues with the wireless network. When ever I turn on Fat Princess, it informs me I need to download the 1.2 update, which is pretty small. It starts going, but always stops somewhere between 9 and 13%. It states that the PS3 was disconnected from the digital media server. I then try again, and the same thing keeps happening. This is also happening for the MAG update. I know the damn thing works with my wireless connection though, because I downloaded MAG, Mega-man 9, and Fat Princess, much larger files, with no problems or disconnects at all. But it chokes and dies every time I try to do these small updates Whats even more weird is that I tried it once, and suddenly fat princess loaded fine, not even asking for an update. I played around with it for awhile, then stopped the game. When I tried to load it again, I'm back to the ever failing update again. Uh, anybody have any ideas? Wireless just being flakey maybe? My experiences with wireless networking have always consisted of "works sometimes, not others, for no readily apparent reason". Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2009, 06:27:06 AM Wireless just being flakey. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2009, 07:22:06 AM Star Ocean: The Fixed Version Seems unlikely. :oh_i_see: I can't remember the title but I think Nippon Ichi is putting out a PS3 game that isn't Trinity Universe. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 18, 2009, 07:56:52 AM Star Ocean: The Fixed Version Seems unlikely. :oh_i_see: I can't remember the title but I think Nippon Ichi is putting out a PS3 game that isn't Trinity Universe. Edit: Trinity Universe is published by Idea Factory, so I'm nothing but worried about that. Last Rebellion is being made by N1 in tandem with Hitmaker. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2009, 08:19:17 AM Eh, yea, I confused that one with some idea that Atlus is putting out a 3D Atelier game. Need sleep. I blame Fallen Earth.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 18, 2009, 08:20:03 AM In other news, Final Fantasy Tactics was released on the PSN in today's update. Though they seem to have forgotten to add a speed up combat option which is going to piss me off. Just saw this, I think I'll buy this version for my yearly playthrough of FFT. Anyone know of other changes besides the Dark & Onion Knight class additions and the multiplayer support? Also, anyone see anything on the MP and if it is any good? I am thinking co-op play would be a bit weird, but some good group vs group action in competitive play would be :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 18, 2009, 08:32:17 AM Eh? Did they release FFT from the PSP or PS1? This would be the first PS1 game they've made changes too if it's the latter.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2009, 08:32:44 AM Wait, Final Fantasy Tactics, multiplyer? Where can i find info on what is different in this version?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on September 18, 2009, 08:34:46 AM From everything I'm seeing, it's actually the PS1 version moded as opposed to the PSP war of the lions version. Especially since it's the PS1 logo even popping up on my screen when I launch it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 18, 2009, 08:35:54 AM So, they added MP and the new classes to the PS1 version? I'm finding that hard to swallow.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2009, 08:37:03 AM From everything I'm seeing, it's actually the PS1 version moded as opposed to the PSP war of the lions version. Especially since it's the PS1 logo even popping up on my screen when I launch it. I love the original. I still need more info, Google is simply telling me that its there, and the PSN website is as detailed as ever (http://www.us.playstation.com/PSN/Store/20288). :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 18, 2009, 08:38:30 AM I don't intend to buy FFT twice unless some magical process allows me to use my original saves.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on September 18, 2009, 08:44:14 AM From everything I'm seeing, it's actually the PS1 version moded as opposed to the PSP war of the lions version. Especially since it's the PS1 logo even popping up on my screen when I launch it. I love the original. I still need more info, Google is simply telling me that its there, and the PSN website is as detailed as ever (http://www.us.playstation.com/PSN/Store/20288). :oh_i_see: As far as I can tell this is a straight up vanilla port of the PS1 version, not the War of the Lions version. The graphics are definitely a bit dated, but for being over a decade old, hold up tolerably well. There is no multiplayer or any of the cutscenes or enhancements from the War of the Lions version. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 18, 2009, 08:45:20 AM edit: i'm a fucking idiot looking at the wrong article :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on September 18, 2009, 08:47:07 AM Segoris - that's the PSP version, not the downloadable PSN.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 18, 2009, 08:48:01 AM That's the PSP version. We're talking about the PSN version.
Edit: Doh, beaten by new page. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on September 18, 2009, 08:49:10 AM Yeah, removing that shit. I was looking at the wrong article after googling "fft psn"
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2009, 08:53:51 AM From everything I'm seeing, it's actually the PS1 version moded as opposed to the PSP war of the lions version. Especially since it's the PS1 logo even popping up on my screen when I launch it. I love the original. I still need more info, Google is simply telling me that its there, and the PSN website is as detailed as ever (http://www.us.playstation.com/PSN/Store/20288). :oh_i_see: As far as I can tell this is a straight up vanilla port of the PS1 version, not the War of the Lions version. The graphics are definitely a bit dated, but for being over a decade old, hold up tolerably well. There is no multiplayer or any of the cutscenes or enhancements from the War of the Lions version. Category: RPG, Strategy Publisher: SCEA Available platforms: PS one™ Release Date: Jan 1998 Players: 2 ? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 18, 2009, 08:55:54 AM Second Player can use another controller afaik and alternate in battle.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 18, 2009, 08:57:32 AM Oh well, I'm getting it anyway.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on September 18, 2009, 02:08:13 PM New video up on the motion controller in detail (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/09/motion-controller-update-part-iii-deep-dive-into-the-e3-demo/) of what was left out or not shown at E3.
So when's tiger woods golf going come out for ps3 with this? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Falconeer on September 18, 2009, 04:39:26 PM Speaking of JRPG, juggling with PSN Japan I found the video for Tales of Vesperia. That reminded me of Eternal Sonata, which I completely missed. Is it worth it?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ingmar on September 18, 2009, 04:42:12 PM Eternal Sonata is a weird fucking game. How much tolerance do you have for long documentary breaks about the life of Frederic Chopin?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: jth on September 18, 2009, 05:40:27 PM I wanted to like Eternal Sonata based on some reviews, so I bought it (the 360 version). I managed to endure about four hours of it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on September 19, 2009, 01:06:16 AM Eternal Sonata had promise. Unfortunately the writing and plot were so horrible I couldn't stomach it past the "betrayal". Game treated you like a retard.
Plus, way, way too many trash monster encounters. The battle system was interesting, just not interesting enough to be fighting every 20 steps. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 21, 2009, 07:41:13 AM They kept changing the battle system as you went, adding timers and generally making it more difficult by changing how it played. Kind of like Baten Kaitos, not coincidentally. It wasn't as bad as Star Ocean, but it was bad. I much preferred Infinite Undiscovery to this.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 22, 2009, 04:52:28 AM I understand that Schild is a Singstar man.
Do the wired USB Rock Band/GHWT mics work with Singstar? - I have 360 ones, but since they're just Logitech USB mics, they should be much of a muchness I figure.. but I would like to get confirmation before I let my wife buy a Singstar game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on September 22, 2009, 05:36:12 AM My wife went to a Singstar party about a month ago. When she got home, she said "Tomorrow, you're buying me Singstar". Those were the last words she spoke for five days because she sang so much she lost her voice. Not sure if I should end up buying it for her or not.
EDIT: Also had a cool gaming moment yesterday. My daughter is 4 1/2 and yesterday she figured out what the popit does in LBP. She was yelling and hollering after putting moustaches and new eyes on her sack'girl'. It's also pink now, of course. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on September 22, 2009, 10:18:44 AM Hope this comes to light..
Sony Planning PSN Import Section (http://www.gameswire.net/news/sony-planning-psn-japanese-import-section_345.html) Quote Following recent news that Yakuza 3 wouldn't be released in the West and then news to the contrary stating that this was actually under discussion, it's now come to light that such titles may find their way over to Western homes via PSN, rather than traditional boxed release. Translating and preparing Japanese games for an unfamiliar Western market has always been something of a risky business cost-wise for publishers. As such PSN provides a cheap way of being able to deliver niche Japanese titles to the small minority of consumers that crave them, without incurring a massive loss on all the usual physical costs. A leaked document from SEGA HQ, which has additionally revealed details of Sony's intention to release the entire PS2 back catalogue on PSN along with some Dreamcast titles, states: "Could put Japanese games directly on PSN for download in a special Japanese Import section (pricing $9.99 to $39.99 for full game)." "Might need to localize menus at least with subtitles." "SCEA interested in helping on MKTG side if they can have period of exclusivity." Obviously this is merely at the discussion stage at present, but use of the word "exclusivity" does suggest that talks have gone further than mere brainstorming. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on September 22, 2009, 10:24:33 AM My wife went to a Singstar party about a month ago. When she got home, she said "Tomorrow, you're buying me Singstar". Those were the last words she spoke for five days because she sang so much she lost her voice. Not sure if I should end up buying it for her or not. EDIT: Also had a cool gaming moment yesterday. My daughter is 4 1/2 and yesterday she figured out what the popit does in LBP. She was yelling and hollering after putting moustaches and new eyes on her sack'girl'. It's also pink now, of course. Is Singstar that much cooler than Rock Band's vocals? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hayduke on September 22, 2009, 11:26:42 AM OK, I'm having some issues with the wireless network. When ever I turn on Fat Princess, it informs me I need to download the 1.2 update, which is pretty small. It starts going, but always stops somewhere between 9 and 13%. Uh, anybody have any ideas? Turn off media servers on your PS3. I think it's under Internet Connection in the settings. Media Servers: Disabled. I don't know why, but I can't download anything if I have media servers enabled Hope this comes to light.. That can't be real. No console company could be that cool. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 22, 2009, 01:20:01 PM Hope this comes to light.. Sony Planning PSN Import Section (http://www.gameswire.net/news/sony-planning-psn-japanese-import-section_345.html) Quote Following recent news that Yakuza 3 wouldn't be released in the West and then news to the contrary stating that this was actually under discussion, it's now come to light that such titles may find their way over to Western homes via PSN, rather than traditional boxed release. Translating and preparing Japanese games for an unfamiliar Western market has always been something of a risky business cost-wise for publishers. As such PSN provides a cheap way of being able to deliver niche Japanese titles to the small minority of consumers that crave them, without incurring a massive loss on all the usual physical costs. A leaked document from SEGA HQ, which has additionally revealed details of Sony's intention to release the entire PS2 back catalogue on PSN along with some Dreamcast titles, states: "Could put Japanese games directly on PSN for download in a special Japanese Import section (pricing $9.99 to $39.99 for full game)." "Might need to localize menus at least with subtitles." "SCEA interested in helping on MKTG side if they can have period of exclusivity." Obviously this is merely at the discussion stage at present, but use of the word "exclusivity" does suggest that talks have gone further than mere brainstorming. Alright, in case some might miss it, the BIG news if this is the case is that they are talking about putting PS2 games on PSN. Assuming it is true. I'm thinking not. They probably meant SEGA's PS1 library. Also, Dreamcast games? Those are going to be ported to a Sony console? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 22, 2009, 01:46:42 PM What's the point of putting PS2 games on PSN now that Sony has removed BC from the PS3? And how many people outside of Japan actually have the network adapter + hard drive (which they don't sell anymore and even if they did they don't work on the PS2 slim) on their PS2s? 10 people maybe?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on September 22, 2009, 02:18:21 PM What's the point of putting PS2 games on PSN now that Sony has removed BC from the PS3? They can charge you $10-20 per game instead of letting you buy used PS2 games from GameStop. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 22, 2009, 04:00:08 PM What's the point of putting PS2 games on PSN now that Sony has removed BC from the PS3? And how many people outside of Japan actually have the network adapter + hard drive (which they don't sell anymore and even if they did they don't work on the PS2 slim) on their PS2s? 10 people maybe? Wait, wouldn't removing BC from the PS3 be a big reason to then offer PS2 games over PSN?Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on September 22, 2009, 04:12:04 PM The user base with BC compatible PS3s is basically fixed right now (modulo the old units people have horded and aren't using right now) and as a percentage of the total installed base is getting smaller every minute.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 22, 2009, 04:20:42 PM The user base with BC compatible PS3s is basically fixed right now (modulo the old units people have horded and aren't using right now) and as a percentage of the total installed base is getting smaller every minute. I think Teleku is assuming that the PS2 games that would be put up on PSN would work on non-BC PS3's, and that by removing BC in PS3's, Sony would essentially be forcing us to rebuy PS2 games if we want to play them on the PS3. Of course right now the whole leak seems like a bunch of "wouldn't it be cool if..." pie in the sky suggestions from Sega to Sony anyway. Edit: Also, the article Stray linked to really sucks, and cherry picks a small number of quotes with no real context. Here is the leak in full that's been going around: Quote SCEA Meeting Aug 5th Notes Aug 6 2009 – DRAFT FOR COMMENTS Objectives of Meeting Dyer agreed to regular quarterly meetings with SOA Sony PS3 SCEA reiterated plans to sell 13 million PS3s this year Big announcement back half of year they can’t talk about (potentially price cut of PS3 to reach hardware goals) SCEA commented on indexing between PS3 and 360 SKUs, should be around 2:1 to garner most favorable treatment. Motion Controller Spring 2010 launch (March in JP) No bundle/pricing details yet, should come Sept 1 Plan on selling 4-5MM units WW SCEA agreed to provide a list of Sega IP that would work well with the motion controller, Virtua Tennis was an example Motion Controller support allows easy way to differentiate PS3 SKU Other differentiation opportunities include PSP/PS3 interoperability – think of features that would make users want to buy both PS3 and PSP SKUs. Alpha Protocol Michael Foster, product evaluator, said AP felt barely RPG. Initial level too challenging for players. “Mass Effect felt more RPG.” Review notes sent to John Merlino a few weeks prior. After meeting Gerald mentioned AP is a high priority for his team. Planet 51 Sell in of PS3 SKU – SCEA noted that other movie titles on PS3 had underperformed as well (inc. Transformers) this cycle. Dyer suggests contacting Susan at Walmart and asking what she wants in the pack to sell this SKU (movie tix etc) Other possibilities are Hybrid movie disc (BD 25 or 50 with Game and Movie on same disc). Bayonetta Collectors edition with Bayonetta Action Figure Novo recommended launching PSN demo around Xmas based off a Jan 5th Ship date with 2-3 week run out to launch. 3-4 weeks is usually ideal demo timing with fresh content every week leading up to launch (trailers, insider video about PG heritage, video blogs). Vancouver 2010 HOME, Olympic destination would garner a lot of positive attention from SCEA Should be doing same with Bayonetta, Marvel etc. Easy to launch in all territories. HOME merchandizing opportunities (clothes etc). Sonic Racing Open to DLC to differentiate PS3 SKU – not ratchet and clank but other characters maybe characters from Rare or Fable universes Yakuza Could put Japanese games directly on PSN for download in a special Japanese Import section (pricing $9.99 to $39.99 for full game). Might need to localize menus at least with subtitles. SCEA interested in helping on MKTG side if they can have period of exclusivity. AVP Another great HOME candidate AVP avatars Hybrid BD disc with movie Iron Man 2 Great candidate for HOME space – explore Tony Stark’s lab etc. Should have one for Marvel in general. PSU2 Could do bundle at GameStop with PSP 30-35K units on UMD, Go, or both. Valkyria 1937 Could bundle with PSP as well. Vanquish and Aliens: CM Opportunity for PS3/PSP interoperability (see Eidos Batman, Army of Two, Assassin’s Creed for good examples). If we offer that SCEA would be really interested in having us at their booth next E3. Thor SCEA would like a look at the code soon. Sonic Anniversary Could put out collectors edition with all old sonic games on one BD disc. “Best of Sonic” for around $99. SCEA would love PSN exclusive power ups/different game modes (like Castlevania’s flip it over/backwards) PS2 emulator for PS3 (confidential) SCEA wants to sell all PS2 titles on PSN (GTA Vice City/Sonic/etc) For co Marketing money show PS3 controller on TV ads – similar to EA Madden Spots, NCAA, etc… London Olympics Perfect opportunity for Motion Controller integration. DC Digital Titles If we provide a list of DC titles SCEA will let us know which ones they’re interested in having exclusively. If we give them a long period of exclusivity they’ll give us more marketing support. PSP Titles For SKU differentiation it’s best to offer features that are slightly different from PS3 version. Titles that are coming up on PSP are Assassin’s Creed II, GTA China Wars, Resident Evil, Little Big Planet – all massive franchises. SCEA has a specific PSP deck which they can send up with their hardware director for a chat. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 22, 2009, 04:24:45 PM Ah, yeah, thats exactly what I was thinking. I thought they had just removed the hardware in it that allowed the PS3 to read the PS2 disks, but I guess it also might not be able to read it from the hard drive either. Which would suck.
As somebody who never bought any PS2 games in the first place, giving a download option for them all would be pretty rad. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 22, 2009, 04:31:58 PM Well it does say in the leak, PS2 emulator for PS3. I don't think there's any way imaginable that they can get the PS2's entire catalog working through software emulation though, so I think the "sell all PS2 titles" part is either just poorly worded and not really what they meant to say, or Sega has misinterpreted Sony's plans. Also keep in mind that this leak was just a draft, and contains some odd mistakes like:
Quote Sonic Racing Open to DLC to differentiate PS3 SKU – not ratchet and clank but other characters maybe characters from Rare or Fable universes Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 22, 2009, 07:11:46 PM My wife went to a Singstar party about a month ago. When she got home, she said "Tomorrow, you're buying me Singstar". Those were the last words she spoke for five days because she sang so much she lost her voice. Not sure if I should end up buying it for her or not. EDIT: Also had a cool gaming moment yesterday. My daughter is 4 1/2 and yesterday she figured out what the popit does in LBP. She was yelling and hollering after putting moustaches and new eyes on her sack'girl'. It's also pink now, of course. Is Singstar that much cooler than Rock Band's vocals? It's the multiple Vocals thing that would appeal. But thanks for reminding me - I need to play some serious RB/GH this week! Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 22, 2009, 07:14:46 PM Just saying, I predicted this exact PS2 on PS3 thing - exactly as they're putting it - well before launch.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on September 22, 2009, 09:51:30 PM Just saying, I predicted this exact PS2 on PS3 thing - exactly as they're putting it - well before launch. You predicted they'd pull bc from PS3's shortly after launching, and then contemplate releasing an unspecified amount of PS2 games on PSN in an unknown timeframe? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on September 22, 2009, 10:55:43 PM He predicted that they'd be selling their large back catalogue of games via downloads (just like Steam was already doing) onto their console with large hard drive and broadband support before launch.
It's not exactly a stretch. As for the rest of Velorath's post.. :drill: :why_so_serious: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 23, 2009, 06:28:44 AM What's the point of putting PS2 games on PSN now that Sony has removed BC from the PS3? And how many people outside of Japan actually have the network adapter + hard drive (which they don't sell anymore and even if they did they don't work on the PS2 slim) on their PS2s? 10 people maybe? PS1 and 2 games on the PSN work just fine on the PS3. One assumes there has been some re-factoring to the titles if they hit the store. The issue with PS2 games on the ps3, is your discs can not be adjusted or recoded. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 23, 2009, 07:02:24 AM PS1 and 2 games on the PSN work just fine on the PS3. Which PS2 games have you seen on PSN? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on September 23, 2009, 09:03:28 AM PS1 and 2 games on the PSN work just fine on the PS3. Which PS2 games have you seen on PSN? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on September 23, 2009, 09:43:10 AM Stop, you are ruining it!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Teleku on September 23, 2009, 10:10:54 PM OK, I'm having some issues with the wireless network. When ever I turn on Fat Princess, it informs me I need to download the 1.2 update, which is pretty small. It starts going, but always stops somewhere between 9 and 13%. Uh, anybody have any ideas? Turn off media servers on your PS3. I think it's under Internet Connection in the settings. Media Servers: Disabled. I don't know why, but I can't download anything if I have media servers enabled Which begs the question, WTF does enabling media severs for the PS3 even mean? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on September 24, 2009, 06:31:04 AM I think it means it will actively sniff the network to find media servers?
Here you go. (http://manuals.playstation.net/document/en/ps3/current/settings/connectdlna.html) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Nerf on September 24, 2009, 05:44:18 PM I haven't had any problem with downloading while media servers are enabled on either PS3 (one first gen ps2 BC, another new as of a month ago), so it might just be a rare issue. That said, the media server thing fucking rocks, being able to watch your entire downloaded library on the bigass HDTV without having to run any wires anywhere is the shit.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Tannhauser on September 30, 2009, 07:52:55 PM Will a wireless mouse work with a PS3 thru a USB connection? I know they have wireless keyboards.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on October 01, 2009, 06:57:14 AM Will a wireless mouse work with a PS3 thru a USB connection? I know they have wireless keyboards. Should. Do not see why it would not. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ard on October 01, 2009, 10:47:59 AM A mouse would work if there was any software/games on the PS3 that supported a mouse. Games have to be made to specifically accept that input vs a controller, and I don't know of any for the ps3 that do. All the fake mouse controllers (the splitfish and whatnot) for the ps3 do it by pretending to be the controller and using the mouse as joystick input.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on October 01, 2009, 10:54:41 AM A mouse would work if there was any software/games on the PS3 that supported a mouse. Games have to be made to specifically accept that input vs a controller, and I don't know of any for the ps3 that do. All the fake mouse controllers (the splitfish and whatnot) for the ps3 do it by pretending to be the controller and using the mouse as joystick input. Unreal Engine 3 supports mouse/keyboard input on the PS3 and UT3 on PS3 allows for such. Dunno about other UE3 engine games.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on October 01, 2009, 10:56:00 AM Of course the game/software has to support it. But it will work and the PS3 will see it. You can use it for the browser if you want.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hayduke on October 01, 2009, 10:56:20 AM Which begs the question, WTF does enabling media severs for the PS3 even mean? Lets you see media servers on your network? I use PlayOn for Hulu and Netflix (not sure Hulu still works). And ps3mediaserver for ripped shit. I don't keep media files on my PS3 at all unless it's mp3s for custom soundtracks. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: CaptainNapkin on October 05, 2009, 08:16:34 PM As a gamefly renter... I'm really beginning to dislike how the PS3 does game updates. Yet another game arrives today, plop it in to get a message that it needs an update. On my Xbox that's usually under a minute... on PS3 it usually goes like it's going as I type this... 608meg update and You cannot perform a background download of this content. 12 minute download is the ETA and when it's done 10 bucks says itll tell me it now needs to be installed which will be another few minutes.
Instant gratification this thing is not. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on October 05, 2009, 08:23:07 PM I can't think of many games with updates like that. What'd you rent? Warhawk? SOCOM?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: CaptainNapkin on October 05, 2009, 09:05:16 PM MotorStorm: Pacific Rift. That probably added to the frustration, it's just an arcade racer, I just wanted to jump in and play. By your comment I have hope it's not truly the norm and just the luck of the draw on the games I've picked to date. Coupled with my severe gaming ADD it's a lot of updatin' and installin' I do.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Hawkbit on October 05, 2009, 09:08:50 PM Burnout Paradise has a crapload of install as well. I recently got halfway through reinstalling it, then realized I didn't want to play the game that badly to begin with.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on October 05, 2009, 10:00:47 PM gug. I'll set Motorstorm PR up to download the update tonight then so when I get around to playing it, I'll be able to actually do so...
:uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on October 06, 2009, 06:25:20 AM The worst offender I've run into yet is Hot Shots Golf. The last time I put the disc in, it performed a huge update on boot, then after I restarted it to play it ran another huge update when I tried to go online. Total time was something like an hour or so.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on October 06, 2009, 10:21:34 AM MotorStorm: Pacific Rift. That probably added to the frustration, it's just an arcade racer, I just wanted to jump in and play. By your comment I have hope it's not truly the norm and just the luck of the draw on the games I've picked to date. Coupled with my severe gaming ADD it's a lot of updatin' and installin' I do. By the sounds of it you don't want games to be supported after release? If you hate updating so much, the solution is simple - disable the PS3's network interface. No updates, just plop in the disc and play. No trophies either, but I assume you don't care about them being you're only renting. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on October 06, 2009, 12:15:39 PM I find the "horribly long update" games to be in the minority, but still it is bothersome when I don't know what it is fixing and can only concentrate on the little bar.
Of course, I play quite a few PS2 games. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on October 06, 2009, 04:14:09 PM GT5:Prologue is brutal also, quite a few patches to download.
I don't mind them as i'll wander off to do other things but its the patches that require a download, install, reboot, and start the whole process again. The audio queue's keep messing me up as its not one release to current patch but a bunch of incremental crap (it was either LBP/GT5:P or burnout). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on October 06, 2009, 07:26:28 PM MotorStorm: Pacific Rift. That probably added to the frustration, it's just an arcade racer, I just wanted to jump in and play. By your comment I have hope it's not truly the norm and just the luck of the draw on the games I've picked to date. Coupled with my severe gaming ADD it's a lot of updatin' and installin' I do. By the sounds of it you don't want games to be supported after release? If you hate updating so much, the solution is simple - disable the PS3's network interface. No updates, just plop in the disc and play. No trophies either, but I assume you don't care about them being you're only renting. What's the deal with trophies anyway? I do put in a little extra to 360 games to achievement whore at times, but not serious 100% catass effort. PS3/Trophies don't have or add to a gamerscore, and while I went into my "house" once, I couldnt see anything in there aside from an opportunity to flush real money for virtual items like tshirts and desks via microtrans (which the 360 is now following). But yeah, where are they and how can I see them? I guess they seem even more useless than achievements. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: CaptainNapkin on October 06, 2009, 09:09:53 PM MotorStorm: Pacific Rift. That probably added to the frustration, it's just an arcade racer, I just wanted to jump in and play. By your comment I have hope it's not truly the norm and just the luck of the draw on the games I've picked to date. Coupled with my severe gaming ADD it's a lot of updatin' and installin' I do. By the sounds of it you don't want games to be supported after release? If you hate updating so much, the solution is simple - disable the PS3's network interface. No updates, just plop in the disc and play. No trophies either, but I assume you don't care about them being you're only renting. And I don't really get the trophies either. I see the message when I earn them but I must be missing the point, there's nothing to them that makes me want to earn more. The 360 always has that little number flashing at me reminding me it wants to grow. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on October 07, 2009, 02:52:49 AM They are a vanity thing. They are ranked in bronze, silver, gold and platinum, with platinum being the "You've got all trophies for this game" trophy and they are visible on your psn ID, something like this:
(http://mypsn.eu.playstation.com/psn/profile/Kageh.png) (http://eu.playstation.com/psn/profile/Kageh/) So you can basically brag about how many gold and platinum trophies you have earned. Which, in my case, is zero! :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on October 07, 2009, 07:30:27 AM The only real difference between a Trophy and an Achievement is that one does not carry a point value, and there is no cumulative numerical score. You can see a summary in your profile, over on the right side of the XMB, otherwise you can go up a couple of icons in the Game column to the Trophy icon and see each of your games and a completion percentage. Really, same thing but missing the points.
The only reason I was interested in Home at all was the idea that I could get some sort of decorative item which indicated my successes; trophies, if you will. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on October 07, 2009, 02:26:01 PM The only real difference between a Trophy and an Achievement is that one does not carry a point value, and there is no cumulative numerical score. You can see a summary in your profile, over on the right side of the XMB, otherwise you can go up a couple of icons in the Game column to the Trophy icon and see each of your games and a completion percentage. Really, same thing but missing the points. The only reason I was interested in Home at all was the idea that I could get some sort of decorative item which indicated my successes; trophies, if you will. :oh_i_see: Um, yea. I was kind of expecting to see my trophies in my house. Silly me. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Lounge on October 07, 2009, 03:49:19 PM The only real difference between a Trophy and an Achievement is that one does not carry a point value, and there is no cumulative numerical score. You can see a summary in your profile, over on the right side of the XMB, otherwise you can go up a couple of icons in the Game column to the Trophy icon and see each of your games and a completion percentage. Really, same thing but missing the points. The only reason I was interested in Home at all was the idea that I could get some sort of decorative item which indicated my successes; trophies, if you will. :oh_i_see: There is a cumulative level based on the number of trophies. I think its pretty much as good as a score. The difference as I see it is how prominent that score is displayed. On Live it's in your face everywhere whereas on PSN you have to dig into their profile a bit to see it. At this point though aren't most people over trophies/achievements? I'm certainly past the point where I go out of my way to get them. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on October 07, 2009, 06:54:17 PM I'm a whore for achievements/trophies, cumulative score or not. Slightly irritated that I can't decorate my apartment with them.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on October 07, 2009, 10:21:22 PM I don't knock myself out over getting 100 of every doohickey, but I do like the little ding-grats of getting them. And searching out the achievements often goes along with getting various unlocks in some games as well.
Trophies are more like "wut?" Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on October 08, 2009, 02:42:20 AM Yeah, I agree that trophies just don't have the same appeal as achievements, which is kinda sad since all Sony had to do was just copy MS. Instead they came up with that whole thing about being able to display your trophies in Home, which presumably got shit-canned when they realized that nobody gives a shit about Home.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on October 09, 2009, 06:11:18 AM Which is stupid because that's the only reason to give a shit about Home.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Le0 on October 13, 2009, 01:14:07 AM I'm about to buy meself a PS3 Slim and I was wondering something, I'm from Switzerland and over here we speak French / German / Italian (National languages) So of course when registering with PSN Switzerland I had only these 3 options as langagues.
The thing is I like playing my games in "VO" which is most of the time English and my question is this, the language in games is it dependant on the language of your console or from the disc you buy? Also is there any possibilities for me to set the language of my console to be english and not french? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on October 13, 2009, 01:25:31 AM Language can be set somewhere in the system settings, I changed mine to english there as I live in Austria and it came with default language german.
I *think* the games default to your PS3 language settings, and for multi-lingual games you can usually set the language manually somewhere too. So far, I managed to play all my PS3 games in english. I also usually buy them at play.com or amazon.co.uk, because they are way cheaper there than at the local retailers. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on October 13, 2009, 01:33:17 AM Which is stupid because that's the only reason to give a shit about Home. I doubt most people would have given a shit about it anyway. I barely look at peoples' achievements when they have their gamertags linked in their sigs, so I can't picture myself ever going out of my way to visit someone's trophy room. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Le0 on October 13, 2009, 03:59:14 AM Language can be set somewhere in the system settings, I changed mine to english there as I live in Austria and it came with default language german. I *think* the games default to your PS3 language settings, and for multi-lingual games you can usually set the language manually somewhere too. So far, I managed to play all my PS3 games in english. I also usually buy them at play.com or amazon.co.uk, because they are way cheaper there than at the local retailers. Cool thanks, glad to hear it, I'll mostly order my games thru these sites as well so its no prob. One more thing, do you own Demon's Souls? If so is it playable on MP from Europe or is it laggy as hell or something? I have the US version on its way and I'm wondering. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on October 13, 2009, 04:33:45 AM My US version is on the way as well, but I own the asian one and MP is perfectly fine so far. I think the US version won't be very different (I think) because MP is hosted on one of the PS3s from the participating players and the blue ghosts are just sync'ing with the body form player who plays host. The "central servers" probably only work as hubs for matchmaking and distributing the message notes on the ground.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on October 13, 2009, 10:48:15 PM Uncharted 2 stuff moved to original thread:
http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=15444.0 Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on October 14, 2009, 10:57:02 AM Which is stupid because that's the only reason to give a shit about Home. I doubt most people would have given a shit about it anyway. I barely look at peoples' achievements when they have their gamertags linked in their sigs, so I can't picture myself ever going out of my way to visit someone's trophy room. Oh, I don't care about other people's achievements or trophies. Well, sometimes I do the thing where you compare yours to your friend's, but even that is very rare. No, it is just for my own pleasure. I'm a collector. Otherwise I agree. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on October 15, 2009, 02:11:05 PM This.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on November 19, 2009, 01:43:38 PM The Source (Canada) PS3 80Gb non slim (http://www.thesource.ca/estore/Product.aspx?aff=IntactEarnings&language=EN-CA&ref=2000&product=5815006) limited clearance in-store only $229.99
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on November 20, 2009, 05:23:53 AM So the "there is no ethernet cable connected" popups shall continue....
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on November 22, 2009, 02:54:05 PM Apparently David Turek, IBM's Vice President, says in this (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/SC09-IBM-laesst-Cell-Prozessor-auslaufen-864497.html) article (German) that IBM is canceling Cell processor development. What this means for Sony is likely profound, as they pinned quite a bit of cost in this generation to the Cell processor, and likely hoped to keep the core in the future. Developers taking it upon themselves to learn the complicated Cell structure today might begin resenting their investment.
One also wonders if Sony is forced to abandon the Cell processor what this will mean for future backwards compatibility. Two generations lacking backward compatibility could be received quite poorly by the community. Also, if you are fluent in German, please post a translated version of this page! Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on November 22, 2009, 03:02:08 PM They are cancelling development of a dual CPU/32 SPE model.
Quote Internet, such as sparrows HPCwire already shouted from the rooftops, now has IBM's Vice President of Deep Computing, David Turek, confirmed in an interview with heise online that the planned successor to the current PowerXCell 8i processor with dual PowerPC processors and 32 SPEs not will give. Thus was the Cell design, but not dead, says that parts of it will reappear in another form. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on November 22, 2009, 03:09:16 PM As optimistic as I'd like to be, most places claim they're dropping out of the Cell race entirely, not just stopping the development of one particular version. Although these translation engines are weak, the comment that "parts of it will show up in other forms" suggests they'll be taking some technology from the Cell into another processor design they have, but the roadmap for the Cell itself has ended.
Some additional discussion on the matter: http://www.playstationuniversity.com/ibm-cancels-cell-processor-development-1295/ Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on November 22, 2009, 06:24:39 PM One also wonders if Sony is forced to abandon the Cell processor what this will mean for future backwards compatibility. Two generations lacking backward compatibility could be received quite poorly by the community. I think a lot of the grief that Sony took about the lack of backwards compatability (when they removed it) was because the PS3 upscaled PS2 games. Since the PS3 is already HD-ready and capable, includes a BRD and HDMI output, it'll be less likely to upset people if they have to keep their PS3 for it's own games. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on November 22, 2009, 08:06:30 PM Well, they could quell resentment I guess by just going intel? Heh.. But then, Sony just loves differentiating themselves.
Not sure how much Toshiba had involvement with Cell. Maybe they'll just sort of go their own route, like Motorola did with PowerPC (vs IBM). I would hope the Cell "alliance" is not actually dependent on just one company. :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on November 23, 2009, 11:20:26 AM One also wonders if Sony is forced to abandon the Cell processor what this will mean for future backwards compatibility. Two generations lacking backward compatibility could be received quite poorly by the community. I think a lot of the grief that Sony took about the lack of backwards compatability (when they removed it) was because the PS3 upscaled PS2 games. Since the PS3 is already HD-ready and capable, includes a BRD and HDMI output, it'll be less likely to upset people if they have to keep their PS3 for it's own games. The upscaler was pretty crappy as far as PS2 games went though, way inferior to the DVD upscaling engine for Blu-Ray for example. I found playing games on my PS2 and using various noise reduction/softening filters on my TV made SD input look noticeably better than using the PS3 upscaler and HDMI - except for way sharper text with the PS3 upscaling. I think the outrage was more about the general lack and removal of the option as most of the people caring about PS2 compatibility probably had a PS2 available, they just didn't want to use two devices. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on November 23, 2009, 12:37:07 PM The current upscaling makes me happy. Also, I would primarily be angry about having to connect two devices, secondarily missing out on the various format options. Tertiarily, I'd have to buy a shit-ton of memory cards.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on November 24, 2009, 09:18:00 AM Tertiarily I just want to go on the record in admiration for your use of this word. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on November 24, 2009, 09:35:21 AM Tertiarily I just want to go on the record in admiration for your use of this word. You realize he learned that from a motherboard manual. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on November 24, 2009, 09:56:51 AM Tertiarily I just want to go on the record in admiration for your use of this word. You realize he learned that from a motherboard manual. If you're trying to increase the amount of impressiveness that is Yegolev, it is working. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on November 24, 2009, 10:30:48 AM Just following the pattern.
I don't read fucking motherboard manuals. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on November 24, 2009, 04:47:03 PM The upscaler was pretty crappy as far as PS2 games went though, way inferior to the DVD upscaling engine for Blu-Ray for example. I found playing games on my PS2 and using various noise reduction/softening filters on my TV made SD input look noticeably better than using the PS3 upscaler and HDMI - except for way sharper text with the PS3 upscaling. I think the outrage was more about the general lack and removal of the option as most of the people caring about PS2 compatibility probably had a PS2 available, they just didn't want to use two devices. I never got to see it, but I found the 360's upscaling to be surprisingly good, so I assumed Sony's upscaler wouls have been just as good. Hence my own rage and refusal to buy a PS3 for a long time (until the slim price drop). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on November 24, 2009, 10:45:54 PM Just following the pattern. I don't read fucking motherboard manuals. :oh_i_see: Obviously, 15 years ago when you learned how to set up that tertiary drive there was no further need for the manual. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on November 25, 2009, 08:11:13 AM Just following the pattern. I don't read fucking motherboard manuals. :oh_i_see: Obviously, 15 years ago when you learned how to set up that tertiary drive there was no further need for the manual. Hmm. Yes. Also, I am now much less impressed with myself. Is anyone being signed out of PSN at random? I am and it is pissing me off. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stu on November 29, 2009, 01:01:17 AM Just picked up The Last Guy and Bomberman Ultra for five bucks each on PSN. Good deal.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on November 29, 2009, 02:24:49 PM A couple days ago my PS3 controller started desyncing itself. It's fully charged and I can turn the PS3 on with the controller's PS button but then the controller's 4 lights keep blinking and it won't navigate the menu or turn the PS3 back off. I can resync it by connecting the controller to the PS3 via USB while the PS3 is off and then turn on the PS3 (either by the PS3 power button or the controller's PS button). Then I disconnect the controller and it will remain sync'd but within a day of turning the PS3 off the controller will desync itself again.
If I try to resync via USB cable while the PS3 is on, after I press the PS button on the controller and see it is sync'd and charging if I disconnect the USB cable the controller returns to desync'd status with 4 blinking lights. I tried to recreate the problem by turning the controller off/on as well as the PS3 off/on but the desync'ing seems to only occur after the PS3 has been off for a few hours. I looked up these symptoms and tried resetting the controller with the button on its back but it has not made a difference. Anyone know what's going on? The only thing I can think of is how I used to charge the controller on my PC with no problem but I recently installed Windows 7 so something automagically broke. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on November 30, 2009, 09:07:11 AM If I try to resync via USB cable while the PS3 is on, after I press the PS button on the controller and see it is sync'd and charging if I disconnect the USB cable the controller returns to desync'd status with 4 blinking lights. I tried to recreate the problem by turning the controller off/on as well as the PS3 off/on but the desync'ing seems to only occur after the PS3 has been off for a few hours. I looked up these symptoms and tried resetting the controller with the button on its back but it has not made a difference. Question, do you have a slim and 3.10? It seems to be a bug effecting the line as a friends controllers wouldn't even work wireless and had to be USB connected. He reset with the controller with the pin also but I cannot remember if it worked sporadically. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on November 30, 2009, 11:54:00 AM Yep, I have a slim and 3.10. If this is a bug then at least it wasn't my magic touch that broke it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on November 30, 2009, 12:15:20 PM There's a few threads in the official ps3 forums so your not alone, check out http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3updates&thread.id=138234
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on November 30, 2009, 02:38:41 PM Thanks for that link. Looks like a bluetooth issue.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: waffel on December 01, 2009, 10:33:13 PM Well, picked up a PS3 slim 120g for 250 today. I have some questions.
Originally, before I planned on a PS3, I was going to HDMi my PC to my LCD as a monitor and watch movies that way. However, after purchasing the PS3 I'd like to use that instead. From what I've been reading, watching streaming HD content wirelessly is nearly impossible unless you have an N network, or kill the quality. So, it looks like the other option would be to send the movies to the PS3 HD, and then watch them off that. Question is, would the quality be better/worse than just hooking the LCD up via the vid card in the PC? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 01, 2009, 10:45:43 PM Well, picked up a PS3 slim 120g for 250 today. I have some questions. Rephrase the question.Originally, before I planned on a PS3, I was going to HDMi my PC to my LCD as a monitor and watch movies that way. However, after purchasing the PS3 I'd like to use that instead. From what I've been reading, watching streaming HD content wirelessly is nearly impossible unless you have an N network, or kill the quality. So, it looks like the other option would be to send the movies to the PS3 HD, and then watch them off that. Question is, would the quality be better/worse than just hooking the LCD up via the vid card in the PC? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: waffel on December 01, 2009, 10:52:08 PM PC ->(HDMI)-> 1080p LCD
or PC ->Wired Ethernet-> PS3 -> 1080p LCD Which would be a better choice as far as quality/ease/etc? In first case, I'm playing video from PC, send case I'm playing video from PS3. I'm talking about 1080p/720p .mkv files Looks like I'd be using ps3mediaserver if I were to stream from PS3. On PC I'd be using Powerdvd 9. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on December 02, 2009, 12:19:35 AM Then the question boils down to "PS3 Media Server" vs. "PowerDVD 9" for HD content watching? Should be pretty much the same if you use cable ethernet.
I'm using the PC with PS3 Media Server and WLAN connection to the PS3. I can stream 720p content fine while throttling the bandwidth somewhere around 15Mbit/sec. Once I try 1080p and the bitrate goes above 20 MBit/sec via WLAN, I start to get stuttering. 720p looks good enough for me on my set. You might want to experiment with PS3 Media Server encoding settings and file types and see what works best to you. I usually transcode the files on the fly to mpeg in order to use subtitles. Maybe using .mkv for HD content works with lower bitrates, not sure. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 02, 2009, 01:12:25 AM I'm not a big fan of using a Media Server unless you happen to have all the files in formats the PS3 can handle without needing any transcoding by the Media Server.
You'll have to experiment with it like Kageh suggested but if you can already hook your PC up to your monitor it seems kind of weird to have both your PC chewing up substantial CPU cycles (assuming you are transcoding) and your PS3 running just to watch a video you can already play on your PC. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on December 02, 2009, 03:03:08 AM I've actually compared the 2 directly recently and found the PS3 gave me much better video quality than the PC did.
Streaming from PC to PS3 over the LAN using ps3mediaserver compared to HDMI directly from PC and the PS3 streamed video (1080p) looked sharper, clearer and with better colours than using VLC, WMP or PowerDVD from the PC. I have no idea why that should be the case but it very clearly was. The disadvantage is the streaming with a media server is clunky and slow. Fast-forwarding or skipping to halfway through a video is very difficult, lags badly and often just doesn't work, whereas that was all fine when playing them directly from the PC. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 02, 2009, 08:03:56 AM Wireless G just isn't sufficient for streaming higher quality video; I recommend simply copying over the entire content of the movie/show or whatever you're watching. Browse to the file on the PS3 when your media server is up, but rather than pressing X to play the file, press the Triangle button for options. Select "Copy", and the PS3 will download the entire file. Once the file is done downloading, it'll run perfectly and allow everything from pausing to rewind and fast forward. Enjoy!
Personally, one of my biggest wishes for future firmware upgrades is a) more codec support (MKV, ISO, IMG, etc) and b) Samba share support so we can push content to the PS3. If Sony does that they'd have a media tank that competes with the best of 'em. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: waffel on December 02, 2009, 02:41:08 PM Ok cool, I have a gigabit cable/LAN so I'll probably stream wired. If that doesn't work then I'll move it to the PS3's HD and try that. Thanks for the tips.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 04, 2009, 11:27:18 AM White Knight Chronicles gets a release date of Feb 2, 2010 (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/12/white-knight-chronicles-international-edition-coming-to-ps3-february-2-2010/). Is this game still worth picking up? I read that it wasn't received very well in Japan. Is that true?
From what I can see they have exactly 1 month to make any and all sales before Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on December 04, 2009, 11:33:33 AM Browse to the file on the PS3 when your media server is up, but rather than pressing X to play the file, press the Triangle button for options. Select "Copy", and the PS3 will download the entire file. Mother fucker, really? I cant believe I ever found/thought of that. I always just let stuff buffer up. Thank you. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on December 04, 2009, 12:08:02 PM White Knight Chronicles gets a release date of Feb 2, 2010 (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/12/white-knight-chronicles-international-edition-coming-to-ps3-february-2-2010/). Is this game still worth picking up? I read that it wasn't received very well in Japan. Is that true? From what I can see they have exactly 1 month to make any and all sales before I think a lot of the criticism was in regards to the online stuff, which seems to have been improved quite a bit (including the addition of voice chat). I'll probably pick it up although I expect that I'll still be playing Mass Effect 2 at that point. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rendakor on December 07, 2009, 09:18:29 PM Anyone else having problems syncing the controller to the PS3? If I use my controller to turn the system on, it turns on then all 4 lights just flash. Pushing the PS button on it does nothing; turning on additional controllers at this point also just puts them in 4-flashing mode.
However, if I turn the system on FIRST with its button, then turn the controller on, it syncs fine. :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on December 07, 2009, 10:15:02 PM Look up the page.
I'm not updating my PS3 until there's 3.10.1 fuck that noise. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rendakor on December 07, 2009, 10:16:36 PM :uhrr: Reading is hard. Sorry about that.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 08, 2009, 11:09:36 AM So Yahoo advises in their Christmas Gift Guide to stay away from the PS3 (http://customsites.yahoo.com/financiallyfit/finance/article-108318-3394-3-gifts-you-may-want-to-avoid-html?ywaad=ad0035). Why?
Quote It's all fun and games until the battery dies. Unlike its competitors, which use replaceable AA batteries, the PS3's remote control is glued shut. When the battery goes, Sony customers have to blow $55 on a new controller. Sony says there's an "environmental benefit" since gamers don't have to toss their batteries on a regular basis, but Isidor Buchmann, president of battery-equipment maker Cadex Electronics, says captive batteries are becoming common because it's cheaper for companies to eliminate the battery housing and hatch. It seems the Microsoft acquisition of Yahoo might be having some affects I wasn't expecting. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on December 08, 2009, 11:12:11 AM I bought my at launch, I have not had to replace a single thing.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 08, 2009, 11:26:18 AM No doubt, but the way they've worded the article, it sure makes it sound like once your controller runs out of juice, you have head out to the store and buy a new PS3 controller. Gotta wonder what the hell is going through this guy's mind.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on December 08, 2009, 11:41:57 AM Anne Kadet is a fearmongering shitheel and I've already begun writing a letter to all of the editors above her breaking down her bullshit in a magazine that's supposed to be reasonably sane. Fuck her and the horse she rode in on.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Malakili on December 08, 2009, 11:46:22 AM Step 1) Microsoft Buys Yahoo
Step 2) Yahoo says don't buy PS3 Step 3) ???? Step 4) Xbox Profit!! Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on December 08, 2009, 12:31:35 PM http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/12/ps3-3-15-system-software-update/
New 3.15 firmware incoming, hopefully it fixes the bluetooth sync issues for owners. Has a new feature to transfer owned data from one PS3 to another system on the same LAN without the need of external storage, huzza? :why_so_serious: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 08, 2009, 12:37:10 PM I have a PS3 now and am playing Uncharted 2 which looks pretty good in 1080p. I like it. Are there any other must have's for the system that one of you chaps can recommend?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 08, 2009, 12:38:23 PM I have a PS3 now and am playing Uncharted 2 which looks pretty good in 1080p. I like it. Are there any other must have's for the system that one of you chaps can recommend? Get a sick sound system. Boom. Boom. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on December 08, 2009, 12:38:39 PM I have a PS3 now and am playing Uncharted 2 which looks pretty good in 1080p. I like it. Are there any other must have's for the system that one of you chaps can recommend? InFamous Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 08, 2009, 12:39:05 PM I have 5.1. It sounds decent enough. Never heard of InFamous. I'll scope it out and maybe GameFly it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 08, 2009, 12:42:33 PM I have 5.1. It sounds decent enough. Never heard of InFamous. I'll scope it out and maybe GameFly it. Way to leave out the details :oh_i_see: Don't we have like a dozen threads or even discussions within this very thread on the subject of PS3 "must-have" games already? Do we have to do this every time someone's mom buys them a PS3 for taking out the garbage? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on December 08, 2009, 12:44:08 PM It's on sale now, bestbuy is selling it for $39 and free DLC this week (the blades)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on December 08, 2009, 01:13:15 PM I have a PS3 now and am playing Uncharted 2 which looks pretty good in 1080p. I like it. Are there any other must have's for the system that one of you chaps can recommend? Batman: Arkham Asylum (also, I thought there was a way to get the rechargables in the PS3 controller changed? I read something somewhere that mentioned it, not sure how accurate it was/is though...) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 08, 2009, 01:22:21 PM I have a PS3 now and am playing Uncharted 2 which looks pretty good in 1080p. I like it. Are there any other must have's for the system that one of you chaps can recommend? Hasn't been updated in a while but:http://wiki.f13.net/index.php/Recommendations:_PS3_%26_PSN Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 08, 2009, 01:30:39 PM Hasn't been updated in a while but: http://wiki.f13.net/index.php/Recommendations:_PS3_%26_PSN Nice call - didn't know that even existed. The topic comes up often enough that the page deserves to be both updated and stickied. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on December 08, 2009, 01:45:14 PM Derail, but.. You should change the color of the forums to the color of that wiki. :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on December 08, 2009, 05:49:46 PM So is the dvd/blue-ray remote that is bundled with the costco ps3 bundle even worth having if you have a universal remote? Are there some wtfpwn nonstandard must have keys on it or something?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on December 08, 2009, 06:48:24 PM If you can fully navigate the XMB and select menu options, then I guess you're fine. I've never tried another remote, but that's all the official one does. There's a PS power button on the remote to turn things on and off.. I doubt you could do that with just any remote, but maybe I'm wrong.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 08, 2009, 09:20:22 PM Why do you even need a remote? I don't get it. I thought all controllers were wireless. At least mine are.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 08, 2009, 09:30:02 PM So is the dvd/blue-ray remote that is bundled with the costco ps3 bundle even worth having if you have a universal remote? Are there some wtfpwn nonstandard must have keys on it or something? It depends on your universal remote. Remember - the Playstation communicates via Bluetooth - not IR like 99.9% of remotes out there. There's a really good chance your existing remote will not work with the PS3. Technically speaking if you wanted to keep things simple and down to 1 remote, you could always get the Logitech Harmony Adapter (http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Harmony-Adapter-Playstation-3/dp/B00267S7XW/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1260336338&sr=8-4) plus a Harmony Remote. I believe there are some Harmony remotes as well which have built in Bluetooh support. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on December 08, 2009, 09:33:59 PM Why do you even need a remote? I don't get it. I thought all controllers were wireless. At least mine are. I got it back in a time when George Bush told me I should spend. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 08, 2009, 09:36:24 PM So is the dvd/blue-ray remote that is bundled with the costco ps3 bundle even worth having if you have a universal remote? Are there some wtfpwn nonstandard must have keys on it or something? Depends if your universal remote can control the PS3 as BitWarrior said. The Sony remote does have a ton of non-standard buttons (about half are non-standard not counting the number buttons) as it includes all the controller buttons plus Red, Green, Blue, Yellow buttons but you don't use them except for maybe the Triangle button when watching movies.Edit: I should mention the Sony PS3 remote is nice as you can navigate things like the PS Store, media content, etc. with just one hand, unlike the controller*. I use my remote all the time even when not watching movies. * well technically you could use the controller to navigate with one hand too but it's not easy. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on December 09, 2009, 06:43:15 AM Technically speaking if you wanted to keep things simple and down to 1 remote, you could always get the Logitech Harmony Adapter (http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Harmony-Adapter-Playstation-3/dp/B00267S7XW/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1260336338&sr=8-4) plus a Harmony Remote. I believe there are some Harmony remotes as well which have built in Bluetooh support. I bought a cheap ($10) Nyko PS3 IR remote from Gamestop and have programmed my Harmony to send commands to the IR dongle that came with it. Sadly, you can't turn the PS3 on with it, but it handles everything else. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on December 09, 2009, 10:24:02 AM Glad I asked, I was unaware it needs a bluetooth remote. Guess I'll just tell my wife to get the costco bundle that includes the remote.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 09, 2009, 01:04:07 PM Why do you guys want PS3 specific remotes so bad? Or even at all? As far as I know all PS3 controllers are wireless and you can power on the system wirelessly with the controller, as well as easily navigate the menus. I feel like a PS3 specific remote would bring nothing to the table except more clutter. What am I missing?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: apocrypha on December 09, 2009, 02:00:10 PM What am I missing? Nothing I can see. I got a remote with my PS3 (part of the bundle I got) and have never, ever used it. All I can think is that it would be useful for people who were incapable of working out how to use the controller. My mother springs to mind, but then she wouldn't be able to understand the XMB anyway. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 09, 2009, 02:15:22 PM Why do you guys want PS3 specific remotes so bad? Or even at all? As far as I know all PS3 controllers are wireless and you can power on the system wirelessly with the controller, as well as easily navigate the menus. I feel like a PS3 specific remote would bring nothing to the table except more clutter. What am I missing? Controlling the movie player with the controller is a frickin pain the butt.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 09, 2009, 02:23:35 PM OK, well I thought maybe there was some cool shit I didn't even know about. It's probably just a preference thing.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on December 09, 2009, 02:25:50 PM For me it was just my semi-OCD desire to have everything operated from one remote, since that's why I have the thing. It helped that it was a cheap solution. It's by no means necessary.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 09, 2009, 04:51:04 PM So your PS3 remote also operates the rest of your home theatre devices? I have a Harmony remote but it doesn't turn on the PS3.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on December 09, 2009, 06:07:52 PM Other way around. The Harmony now controls everything. I just bought the cheap PS3 remote to add the IR receiver that Sony left out. :P
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 09, 2009, 06:43:12 PM Ohhhhh. So your Harmony remote interfaces with your PS3 remote as an intermediary to turn on/off your PS3? Classy.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: MisterNoisy on December 09, 2009, 10:09:24 PM Ohhhhh. So your Harmony remote interfaces with your PS3 remote as an intermediary to turn on/off your PS3? Classy. Huh? I'm not sure you understand - the Nyko remote comes with an IR receiver dongle that plugs into one of the PS3's USB ports and enables the PS3 to receive commands from the Harmony remote. The actual Nyko remote is in a box somewhere and has never even had batteries in it - I only wanted the IR dongle it came with. I only mentioned it because it was a hell of a lot cheaper than Logitech's $60 widget and does largely the same thing. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on December 10, 2009, 07:56:37 AM Oh ok, cool, I might actually get one of those then.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: NiX on December 10, 2009, 08:13:08 AM Anyone know of any impending deals for the holidays? Maybe a new fancy bundle or whatnot.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on December 10, 2009, 01:57:09 PM Anyone know of any impending deals for the holidays? Maybe a new fancy bundle or whatnot. I keep seeing decent Wii and Xbox deals, haven't noticed PS3.. but maybe since I have one, that's why. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on December 10, 2009, 02:06:15 PM Walmart had a dark night on blue-ray + infamous + arcane asylum for $299.
I think Best Buy had the best deal rachet and clank + little big planet for $299. And costco has the ps3 remote + uncharted for like $340. Not sure if any of these besides the costco one are still available though. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on December 10, 2009, 02:23:23 PM I'm not seeing any bundles that are worth it (and not sold out online) for Bestbuy or Walmart. Walmart does have a bundle sold out online (maybe available in store) that is the console, controller, remote, game of choice from a decent list, and an accessory for $389. That would be a bit better value then the Costco one imo which is basically face value of the entire package with the word "bundle" tagged on ($299 for console, ~$25 for Uncharted, ~$15 for the remote since it's on sale now anyways).
Maybe there is a Dell x% off coupon flying around the internet somewhere? I think it was slickdeals that normally has those from time to time for some % off, which would be pretty smooth if no decent bundles pop up. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on December 10, 2009, 02:49:00 PM These were the black Friday deals: http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation-3/sony-unveils-new-black-friday-ps3-slim-bundle-deals/ (http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation-3/sony-unveils-new-black-friday-ps3-slim-bundle-deals/)
Quote Amazon: 120GB PS3 system inFAMOUS and Killzone 2 for $299 and $10 Amazon promotional credit • Best Buy: 120GB PS3 system with LittleBigPlanet: Game of the Year and Ratchet and Clank Future: A Crack in Time $299 • GameStop: 120GB PS3 system with God of War Collection (1 & 2) and LittleBigPlanet: Game of the Year $299 • Sony Style: 120GB PS3 system with UNCHARTED: Drake’s Fortune and inFAMOUS $299 • Walmart: 120GB PS3 system with inFAMOUS and Batman Arkham Asylum, plus the Dark Knight Blu-ray Disc Movie $299 Only Dell coupon code I see that might apply is the $20 off electronics and accessories one. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: NiX on December 10, 2009, 05:23:31 PM I'm in Canada, which would explain why I haven't heard of those deals. I missed out on the 40" bravia + PS3 for $1000. If there ends up being a deal at Wal-Mart I can get my buddy to grab a discount for me, guess I'll have to look around.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on December 10, 2009, 05:28:16 PM Yeah, I just don't think those Black Friday deals are still running though which is why I went looking for other bundles that may be available. I'm definitely not finding the BF bundles/sales on any of those retailer's websites.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on December 11, 2009, 04:41:53 AM I'm in Canada, which would explain why I haven't heard of those deals. I missed out on the 40" bravia + PS3 for $1000. If there ends up being a deal at Wal-Mart I can get my buddy to grab a discount for me, guess I'll have to look around. Real canadian super store has their last no tax event on Saturday/Sunday so you could pick up a slim for $299, either that or Dell might have some bundle deals again around boxing week. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on December 11, 2009, 12:19:36 PM So, I just got word that my promotion is official and I'm getting a 10% pay raise (with another 5+% next june). So I figured I'd celebrate by getting a ps3 since my 360 is banned and I dont' feel like putting more money into it.
Sooo, what are some games I should get? I'll probably get uncharted 1 since I heard so much about it. Anything else? I'm probably going to get it from Best Buy so I can get 18 months of no interest if that affects the decision at all. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 11, 2009, 01:05:42 PM So, I just got word that my promotion is official and I'm getting a 10% pay raise (with another 5+% next june). So I figured I'd celebrate by getting a ps3 since my 360 is banned and I dont' feel like putting more money into it. See here:Sooo, what are some games I should get? I'll probably get uncharted 1 since I heard so much about it. Anything else? I'm probably going to get it from Best Buy so I can get 18 months of no interest if that affects the decision at all. http://forums.f13.net/index.php?topic=18433.0 Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on December 11, 2009, 01:29:29 PM Sorry never saw that. Didn't even know there was an f13 wiki.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on December 11, 2009, 01:56:10 PM Real canadian super store has their last no tax event on Saturday/Sunday so you could pick up a slim for $299, either that or Dell might have some bundle deals again around boxing week. You guys get a week for Boxing Day? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on December 11, 2009, 02:08:58 PM Real canadian super store has their last no tax event on Saturday/Sunday so you could pick up a slim for $299, either that or Dell might have some bundle deals again around boxing week. You guys get a week for Boxing Day? Usually meant to spread out the insanity - most stores now run and advertise "Boxing Week" rather than the single day. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on December 18, 2009, 07:25:27 AM http://www.us.playstation.com/modnation/onlinebeta/
Beta has started and yes the vouchers went out via email this morning :drill: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on December 18, 2009, 08:35:44 AM Good timing I was just looking at racing games to play with the wife. I think i'll go buy a copy of little big planet and get my beta voucher, hope it has a split screen or h2h 2 players on 1 console option.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on December 19, 2009, 12:38:22 AM Have they released the update that unfucks wireless controllers yet?
I'm still avoiding the previous update. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on December 19, 2009, 12:50:59 AM It doesn't look like the 3.15 update fixes that problem and it breaks a bunch of other stuff as well... :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on December 19, 2009, 01:25:40 AM I guess I'll stick to the PC and 360 for MP gaming for the next ...forseeable future. :uhrr:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on January 02, 2010, 11:46:35 PM Valkyria Chronicles available for $20 right now from Gamestop (http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=4058)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: NiX on January 02, 2010, 11:59:26 PM Anyone know if the most recent firmware causes freezing? BF1943 and Uncharted 2 have both frozen once. Not a huge issue, but it was a hard lock and I know when 3.0 came out it buggered up Uncharted 1.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on January 04, 2010, 05:06:53 AM My ps3 froze once while playing Infamous. Since I am a new ps3 owner, I haven't played on previous firmware, but it was updated to the latest.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on January 04, 2010, 03:32:12 PM No freezes on current one for me so far, 60 GB EU launch model and 80 GB fat PS3.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Dion on January 05, 2010, 10:20:43 AM Anyone know if the most recent firmware causes freezing? BF1943 and Uncharted 2 have both frozen once. Not a huge issue, but it was a hard lock and I know when 3.0 came out it buggered up Uncharted 1. Uncharted 2 froze twice for me, both in loading screens or cinematics.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on January 05, 2010, 10:23:35 AM Think I'll go on ignoring the most recent upgrade then. Uncharted 2 froze on me once during a rather large explosion. Thank goodness that game compulsively autosaves.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: NiX on January 05, 2010, 04:03:14 PM I was just walking up stairs when it froze, unless an explosion happened off screen. Haven't had any issues since and thank god it hasn't locked up during Demon's Souls. Then I would be angry.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Dion on January 06, 2010, 04:39:43 PM Uncharted 2 froze again in chapter 25, the same time it froze last time... Really annoying.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on January 06, 2010, 04:41:58 PM Uncharted 2 froze again in chapter 25, the same time it froze last time... Really annoying. What's your system version and which PS3 do you have?Title: Re: PS3 Post by: dusematic on January 06, 2010, 08:11:16 PM I have an original 60gb PS3 and have had zero probs.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on January 06, 2010, 09:53:15 PM 60gb here too, but I'm not even bothering until I see less complaints here. :grin:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on January 07, 2010, 11:10:11 AM I don't recall any lockups in Uncharted 2. 60GB release model. Might have happened once but, really, compared to the 360 it is NEGLIGIBLE and I don't really notice.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on January 08, 2010, 05:57:46 AM Never had a lock up. If i did, I would look in the software developers direction before I would at the hardware.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on January 08, 2010, 11:59:11 PM I don't recall any lockups in Uncharted 2. 60GB release model. Might have happened once but, really, compared to the 360 it is NEGLIGIBLE and I don't really notice. You just had a controller trashed (for the time being) with the sync issues, didn't you? Or is that only the case with one game? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on January 09, 2010, 06:25:15 AM I don't recall any lockups in Uncharted 2. 60GB release model. Might have happened once but, really, compared to the 360 it is NEGLIGIBLE and I don't really notice. You just had a controller trashed (for the time being) with the sync issues, didn't you? Or is that only the case with one game? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on January 09, 2010, 07:51:38 AM Yeah I know, but he was talking about his controller no longer syncing while playing it. Which suggests a hardware (well, firmware) issue more than a software one.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on January 10, 2010, 03:11:27 PM Like I said, I haven't played many PS2 games lately, the most recent being Mana Khemia 2 from a few months ago. Might be some firmware conflict with the PS2 emulator, might be Rogue Galaxy itself, but hard to say unless I get back into the PS2 backlog with games that I have not had a desync with... which would actually be every PS2 title I played in 2009. I did have some desync problems long ago but they disappeared well before v3 firmware arrived. Since I have a PS3 model that is no longer manufactured, it is possible that they are going to leave me out in the cold as far as testing fw updates. That would be a shit move, but the "global economic crisis" has managed to turn many companies into complete dickbags.
This wasn't just a desync, though. The four LEDs started a fast-flash and I could not turn it off; this was faster than the flash it does when connecting to the PS3. I plugged it in and it kept doing it. Activating another controller worked fine, so I used that one to shut down the system. New problem, I think. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: NiX on January 10, 2010, 05:12:20 PM Never had a lock up. If i did, I would look in the software developers direction before I would at the hardware. A lot of freezing issues and syncing issues were caused by firmware. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on January 12, 2010, 03:11:54 AM This wasn't just a desync, though. The four LEDs started a fast-flash and I could not turn it off; this was faster than the flash it does when connecting to the PS3. I plugged it in and it kept doing it. Activating another controller worked fine, so I used that one to shut down the system. New problem, I think. So does the controller work again now with PS3 games? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on January 12, 2010, 09:07:59 AM This wasn't just a desync, though. The four LEDs started a fast-flash and I could not turn it off; this was faster than the flash it does when connecting to the PS3. I plugged it in and it kept doing it. Activating another controller worked fine, so I used that one to shut down the system. New problem, I think. So does the controller work again now with PS3 games? Works fine, although I have not used that particular one other than to test it just now. It is one of my Sixaxises, not the Dualshock3. I don't recall having a desync or other controller problem in a PS3 game, but at launch I mostly played PS2 games. The emulator has always been a bit behind the curve, in my opinion. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on January 12, 2010, 03:34:46 PM I realized I had already patched to this version awhile back.. So.. umm, no hiccups with my 60gig either.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on January 13, 2010, 08:30:30 AM GT5 is now delayed with no new timetable :heartbreak:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on January 13, 2010, 10:34:49 AM GT5 is now delayed with no new timetable :heartbreak: I was interested until I read a review stating that the ai runs the same race every time and doesn't follow collision detection rules with other cars controlled by the ai. Of course I haven't gone so far as to ask the good people here if any of that is true. edit: on a semi related note is there a decent ps3 racing game with split screen view so I can race my wife? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on January 13, 2010, 03:43:54 PM Not sure what kind of racing you have in mind, but Pacific Rift can split up to 4
I'm sure GT will be worth the wait.. There are a lot of good titles out there though. Not just Forza. I never thought I'd say this, but even Codemasters is becoming a worthy competitor to Polyphony (Grid and Dirt.. although they could be better). [edit] Not entirely true.. as those games will probably never have as many cars (and they're not straight sims). There is good shit out there to hold you off tho Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on February 13, 2010, 10:39:43 AM You can get fl0w for free today on the PSN store.
Just logon and download fl0w via games -> ps3 games -> d-g -> and you should see fl0w full game for free. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on February 13, 2010, 04:44:06 PM You can get fl0w for free today on the PSN store. Just logon and download fl0w via games -> ps3 games -> d-g -> and you should see fl0w full game for free. Nice, I forgot to check it out after I caught the reference to it in Flower. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on February 17, 2010, 10:13:17 AM Quick question since I don't want to necro the Lair thread from 2008 - would Lair be a good game now that its controls are finally sane? (ie: not six-axis based)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on February 17, 2010, 04:23:47 PM You can get fl0w for free today on the PSN store. Just logon and download fl0w via games -> ps3 games -> d-g -> and you should see fl0w full game for free. Nice, I forgot to check it out after I caught the reference to it in Flower. Managed to pick it up the other day. You can definitely feel the control scheme similarities to Flower. Easily worth the low low price of FREE. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 20, 2010, 10:42:46 AM Hustle Kings is pretty good, well worth the $10 (if you like Pool at least).
Blade Kitten (http://www.viddler.com/explore/sceablog/videos/809/35.633) looks like a decent PSN title, coming soon. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Merusk on February 21, 2010, 03:12:08 PM So what's the deal with these lately? You can't find them online or in stores right now, are they selling out for a new bundle to be released, under-manufacturing, or are they really 'flying off the shelves' 3years later? Sony's exec warned about 'shortages' back in September, but I can't imagine they're still having them without fueling it themselves.
I ask because I was going to buy one now that the taxes are done, but you can't find the damn things. I might just go ahead and get the Elite instead, as there's very few 'want to play' exclusives I'd miss out on. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on February 21, 2010, 09:49:07 PM I ask because I was going to buy one now that the taxes are done... I believe you just answered your own question. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stu on February 21, 2010, 09:52:25 PM Fuck! I have to do my taxes.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on February 21, 2010, 10:54:23 PM So what's the deal with these lately? You can't find them online or in stores right now, are they selling out for a new bundle to be released, under-manufacturing, or are they really 'flying off the shelves' 3years later? Sony's exec warned about 'shortages' back in September, but I can't imagine they're still having them without fueling it themselves. I can find them almost everywhere. Lots of people are buying slims though. Quote I might just go ahead and get the Elite instead That would be stupid, because... Quote as there's very few 'want to play' exclusives I'd miss out on. ...this is wrong. SCEA is the only company of the two with any sizable number of exclusives unless you count Halo, which is largely irrelevant now. Demon's Souls, Gran Turismo, Last Guardian, Heavy Rain, Uncharted, MAG, Killzone 2, Little Big Planet, Mod Nation Racers, WipeOut, Twisted Metal, Echo Chrome, Disgaea, Folklore, God of War, Hot Shots series, Heavenly Sword, 3D Dot Heroes etc, etc, etc, etc. Microsoft's list is like Fable, Halo, Forza. And uhhhhhh. I don't know. Shadow Complex. You know, just go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_3_games and sort by exclusivity. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 22, 2010, 12:34:11 AM While I've grown to like my 360, some of the better exclusives on it are not exclusives anymore now (ME, Bioshock, Gears, etc). It's especially useful for me since I don't have a good gaming PC.. The current 360 exclusives that are left are pretty cool (Dead Rising, Vesparia, Ace Combat, Forza), but I think Sony has offered the more unique experiences, and has a higher quantity now. I think the only Sony exclusives that I didn't care for was Lair and Infamous (and Infamous isn't necessarily bad.. I just got motion sickness from it hehe).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on February 22, 2010, 01:35:31 AM When did Gears of War stop being a MS exclusive? I never heard about anything like that. Or are you counting the PC?
Maybe you are, since you also mention Mass Effect. Bioshock is the only one of the three that's now on PS3. Despite Schild's list being half-filled with shit titles, I'd have to agree that the PS3 has more exclusives these days that *I* would like to play, but it really depends on how many mean anything to *you*. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:PlayStation_3-only_games http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_games Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on February 22, 2010, 01:41:47 AM Despite Schild's list being half-filled with shit titles :popcorn:Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on February 22, 2010, 02:40:13 AM Despite Schild's list being half-filled with shit titles :popcorn:He's got somewhat of a point. Disgaea, Folklore, Heavenly Sword, MAG, and Hot Shots, are about as well regarded as 360 exclusives Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Banjo Kazooie, or the Viva Pinata games. I don't think any of them really stand up as reasons to pick one system over the other. I do think the PS3 still has a better lineup, especially for people who have a decent PC (for those that don't, Mass Effect would almost balance it out in my opinion and possibly Splinter Cell Conviction), but the 360 does still have some potentially good exclusives coming out this year like Crackdown 2 and Alan Wake (which is no longer getting a PC release). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 22, 2010, 03:20:46 AM When did Gears of War stop being a MS exclusive? I never heard about anything like that. Or are you counting the PC? Maybe you are, since you also mention Mass Effect. Bioshock is the only one of the three that's now on PS3. Despite Schild's list being half-filled with shit titles, I'd have to agree that the PS3 has more exclusives these days that *I* would like to play, but it really depends on how many mean anything to *you*. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:PlayStation_3-only_games http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_games No, I meant Gears is a PC title too. Sorry if I confused you. For me, an Xbox is pretty useful since..... well, look at the grief title, I've got a Mac (but then, I think Gears may even be on the Mac??). Anyways, if you have a gaming PC, you can get a taste of some of better 360 titles, I guess. That's all I'm saying. -- Folklore and Heavenly Sword are pretty underrated imo. But then, I've not played Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey yet (to name a few of the 360 titles mentioned above). I heard LO was decent... Personally, PERSONALLY, nothing has topped MGS4 and Valkyria Chronicles. I like the PS3 for those alone. :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Merusk on February 22, 2010, 03:43:04 AM You know, just go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_3_games and sort by exclusivity. I did. :awesome_for_real: Yeah, no 120 slims and none of the next tier up, either. Best Buy, Target, Wal*Mart, even fucking Meijer had nothing in stock. Very fucking weird. Out of that List, I recall folks here Panning Heavenly Sword for some reason, and God of War is the only one I really care about missing. The console is more for the kids, as I'm getting too old and involved in my career to have much time for games anymore. For that reason the 360 makes more sense since then they could play with their cousins on Live. Meh. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 22, 2010, 03:56:53 AM If it's for kids, I guess you could swing either way with one.
Heavenly Sword is a merely a victim of being an early release (same with Folklore). They were not omfgawesome titles at a time that people were wanting one, but they are good games in their own right. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Merusk on February 22, 2010, 03:27:39 PM Bought a factory refub'd 40g today for $60 less than the 120gb slim. Plus it's got the more attractive case, so win IMO. Picked up Spyro, Ratchet & Clank, Heavenly Sword (It was $20, what the hell, eh) and Vylkyria Chronicles. VC was also only $20, I thought that it'd be more considering the raves y'all had for it.
The story I heard re: shortages is that 1) Japanese tax season just happened and so they were holding back exports they'd have to have paid tax on while paying last years taxes and 2) Chinese new year happened after that, meaning factories were shut down for a week or better so there's a shortage. Not sure I buy either, but it's at least plausible. Oh, best buy online is also sold out, as is Amazon (Unless you use one of their associated resellers who are price gouging atm.) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 22, 2010, 03:42:12 PM VC is cheap because it too was underrated.
Since you went PS3 in the end, check out Little Big Planet after your kids exhaust Spyro. :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on February 22, 2010, 03:48:56 PM VC was also only $20, I thought that it'd be more considering the raves y'all had for it. Quality doesn't always translate into sales. Next to MGS4 and the Uncharted series, it might be the best game on the system. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on February 22, 2010, 04:33:19 PM VC is cheap because it too was underrated. It got pretty high ratings in most reviews. It's just a niche game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on February 22, 2010, 05:57:47 PM No, I meant Gears is a PC title too. Sorry if I confused you. For me, an Xbox is pretty useful since..... well, look at the grief title, I've got a Mac (but then, I think Gears may even be on the Mac??). Anyways, if you have a gaming PC, you can get a taste of some of better 360 titles, I guess. That's all I'm saying. No problem, I get you. Quote Personally, PERSONALLY, nothing has topped MGS4 and Valkyria Chronicles. I like the PS3 for those alone. :grin: Again, no problem. In fact, you make my point there. It all depends on which (if any) of either console's exclusives mean shit to each individual. For me, MGS and Halo, Forza and GT (if it ever comes out) are all as meaningless as each other, despite being amongst each console's "PHWOAR" exclusives. FWIW, I have no problems with Heavenly Sword. I own it, and my wife also enjoys it. Take it for what it is - a simple but fun choppy-chop game that is now sold cheaply since it was a launch title. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on February 22, 2010, 06:06:16 PM Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on February 23, 2010, 08:07:35 AM LO was terribly gorgeous and not "bad" per se, but it certainly wasn't "good." Sakaguchi will get it right... eventually.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on February 23, 2010, 08:17:28 AM It had its moments until I got tired of those moments. It could have been a very good game with better pacing (frequent 30-60+ minute stretches of no-save gameplay is not acceptable), less of an overly sappy plot, and a more engaging/ess "retro for retro's sake" feel to the combat.
Still, it has one of the most geniune gut wrenching moments I've seen in a game and an interesting take on life as an immortal. I'd rebuy it on the cheap and finish it.. if I was ever left bed ridden and jobless for around 6 months. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 23, 2010, 11:14:28 AM Hmm, I'll keep it in mind until it's cheaper too.
I just bought Blue Dragon though. Under $10, so whatever. :oh_i_see: Also found Earth Defense Force under $10. :awesome_for_real: But it's time to play Heavy Rain for now. :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Lounge on February 23, 2010, 11:50:22 AM LO was terribly gorgeous and not "bad" per se, but it certainly wasn't "good." Sakaguchi will get it right... eventually. LO looked great, but the voice acting on all but one character was so terrible. The gameplay itself was mediocre at best. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: NiX on February 24, 2010, 04:51:31 AM Just noticed that no Canadian website lists VC. I don't know if they're spelling it differently, but even searching each section by page comes up with nothing. The fuck.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on February 24, 2010, 08:40:09 AM Just noticed that no Canadian website lists VC. I don't know if they're spelling it differently, but even searching each section by page comes up with nothing. The fuck. It's just hard to fine. I have seen it once in store best buy but never again. Amazon.ca (http://www.amazon.ca/Sega-Of-America-Inc-69020/dp/B0016C3260?SubscriptionId=0RCYPK6P87KG2XNF0RR2&tag=shopbotca-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B0016C3260) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Merusk on February 24, 2010, 03:46:59 PM I picked it up at a Gamestop.
A few hours in and I can see why it wasn't widely accepted. There's a few things that are driving me fucking batty about it, but it's a pretty fun game regardless of those flaws. Hate the way the storyline is broken up into 8 cut scenes a 'chapter' however... just show me it all at fucking once, thanks. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 24, 2010, 04:20:03 PM I picked it up at a Gamestop. A few hours in and I can see why it wasn't widely accepted. There's a few things that are driving me fucking batty about it, but it's a pretty fun game regardless of those flaws. Hate the way the storyline is broken up into 8 cut scenes a 'chapter' however... just show me it all at fucking once, thanks. I suppose you'll see over time that you're better off with the chapter/section breakdowns. More time for training/equipping/setting up units for a specific map, that sort of thing. I think it's not widely accepted more for the fact that few even know about it (relatively speaking), and, I suppose, maybe too cute for some people. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on February 26, 2010, 08:11:50 AM Anyone opinions on the best drivers for PS3 controllers on a PC?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on February 26, 2010, 11:23:23 AM Can't say I've tried it myself, but at a glance, it seems like no matter what, the sixaxis controls would never be utilized. Not that it'd matter.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stu on February 26, 2010, 01:35:36 PM Anyone pick up Greed Corp on PSN yet?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on March 10, 2010, 12:23:02 PM Sony's GDC Press Conference is scheduled to start at 4pm PST today. Most sites are live blogging it, while a few will also be doing live video streams.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 10, 2010, 12:40:58 PM Next firmware to enable 3D. (http://www.softsailor.com/news/7068-2010-ps3-firmware-update-to-bring-on-3d-games.html)
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on March 10, 2010, 02:55:37 PM Please get GT5 out this year (newish Nights Trailer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7AJaIAp09c)).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 10, 2010, 04:35:25 PM Holy fuck this music. Kill me now.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 10, 2010, 04:38:15 PM The Playstation Move Subcontroller.
lol Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 10, 2010, 04:57:47 PM All of the "Move" games they showed still relied heavily on pre-scripted moves. Everyone's punch ends up looking the same no matter how they throw it, which is understandable since the game(s) seemed not to know where the users' body is. (otherwise u end up with awkward motion)
So if the Eye isnt enough to get a good read on where the body is so they can make adequate use of the resolution they have, then they're gonna have to start selling the damned bodysuits. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 10, 2010, 05:02:03 PM Quote So if the Eye isnt enough to get a good read on where the body is so they can make adequate use of the resolution they have, then they're gonna have to start selling the damned bodysuits. What are you talking about? In last years demo it had full 1:1 tracking of the wands in the paint and lightsaber demos. The game does know, theoretically, where the bodies are placed, but no one wants their exact (arm)stance and positioning dictated into a fighting game. It would look like, well, something that shouldn't be said in mixed company. Edit: Also, why even care? I mean, it's more waggle. Great. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 10, 2010, 05:35:48 PM Quote So if the Eye isnt enough to get a good read on where the body is so they can make adequate use of the resolution they have, then they're gonna have to start selling the damned bodysuits. What are you talking about? In last years demo it had full 1:1 tracking of the wands in the paint and lightsaber demos. The game does know, theoretically, where the bodies are placed, but no one wants their exact (arm)stance and positioning dictated into a fighting game. It would look like, well, something that shouldn't be said in mixed company. Edit: Also, why even care? I mean, it's more waggle. Great. The paint stuff and other social crap had 1:1 hand tracking because that's all they require, but none of the fighting games in the GDC had 1:1 in actual combat. OOC you could move your limbs around, but once you made a move it was scripted. Aside from that, w/o true bodily representation a Gamer always in the back of their mind knows "this could be done a lot better with a gamepad or mouse." Games that are truly virtual have no such limitation save for physical ability. And what's so bad about wanting to actually be able to spar with your friends? I cant be the only one who wants their exact body position dictated into a game. To me, there's no point for the waggle otherwise. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ingmar on March 10, 2010, 05:36:49 PM Um... because people want to have a fighting game they can play without actually having to know a martial art?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 10, 2010, 07:26:00 PM Um... because people want to have a fighting game they can play without actually having to know a martial art? I wouldnt be so sure about that. Sure, it's kind of a paradigm-shifting opinion, but I dont think it's that outta left field. People ultimately want to get inside the game, not fool around in different ways outside of it. The latter is ok in the short-term, but it gets old rather fast, especially with today's tech. and market. <shrug> I'm sure there's something in the pipe using Move that's a bit more extreme, just so far I havent seen it... maybe at E3. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on March 10, 2010, 08:11:42 PM 2010, year of the peripherals:
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2938963/p.jpg) (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2938963/w.jpg) (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2938963/x.jpg) :ye_gods: ¿ƃuıuəddɐɥ sı ʇɐɥʍ Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 10, 2010, 08:28:43 PM Quote And what's so bad about wanting to actually be able to spar with your friends? I cant be the only one who wants their exact body position dictated into a game. To me, there's no point for the waggle otherwise. You are. Seriously. Go spar with friends if that's what you want. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: HaemishM on March 11, 2010, 08:43:18 AM I like the Move videos I've seen. It may actually be something like what i wanted the waggle remote be.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 11, 2010, 09:31:22 AM I'd pick up NMH for the PS3 if it has Move support.
Also, I'd like WiiSports PS3. ... Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on March 11, 2010, 10:13:17 AM Quote And what's so bad about wanting to actually be able to spar with your friends? I cant be the only one who wants their exact body position dictated into a game. To me, there's no point for the waggle otherwise. You are. Seriously. Go spar with friends if that's what you want. This may be too general a point for this discussion... But probably the only problem I have with waggle enthusiasts is that they somehow think that gaming was always meant to move more and more into the realm of simulation - that waggle is closer to some kind of realization of true gaming... and I should jump for joy the more something departs from typical controls into something more realistic.. But typical gaming controls have always been their own thing that I appreciated in and of themselves. It has it's own inherent patterns/puzzles/memory challenges that I get a kick out of. It's not like I was playing all along because of the lack of a more realistic simulation of this or that activity. It's not like I've been biding my time all of these years waiting to really mimic Ken's spin kick or realistically jump on toadstool heads or whatever. Game controls have always been fine as they are.. something waggle can stand beside.. but not replace. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on March 11, 2010, 11:34:46 AM That's all well and fine, but if you guys don't think that Real Swordfighting 2011 (or somesuch) wouldn't sell to a certain piece of the populace, you are raving bonkers. I am aware that there are significant problems to delivering such an experience, but I guarantee that there are plenty who want to see that level of realism.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on March 11, 2010, 11:51:06 AM I didn't say it wouldn't sell. I'd try it myself.
I would really hate to see this stuff get so common/popular though, to the point where programming controls with the typical gaming paradigm isn't considered anymore. Fuck that. ...... and, that's pretty much why I'm not a big Wii fan. It's generally waggle or nothing. They push it the point where you don't even get an option to control some games the traditional way. When some are argubably better off on a gamepad. It's a case of over-enthusism for waggle, like it's a one-size-fits-all solution to gaming. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 11, 2010, 11:55:04 AM That's all well and fine, but if you guys don't think that Real Swordfighting 2011 (or somesuch) wouldn't sell to a certain piece of the populace, you are raving bonkers. I am aware that there are significant problems to delivering such an experience, but I guarantee that there are plenty who want to see that level of realism. This. Maybe it's just a question of simulation vs. game. I've always been a sim phreak, but I know I'm not the only one that is. I am in agreeance that motion-designers at this point need to take a more definitive stance on what they're trying to do though, instead of blurring the lines. Either make it sim and dont half-ass, or make a quality "gaming" experience. Down the road perhaps the two will meet in the middle. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Lantyssa on March 11, 2010, 12:04:01 PM They think they want to see it.
When they see what happens when a camera shows them how dorky they really look because the system mimicked their exact moves, they will never play the game again. It's a terrible idea. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Cyrrex on March 11, 2010, 12:06:30 PM I didn't say it wouldn't sell. I'd try it myself. I would really hate to see this stuff get so common/popular though, to the point where programming controls with the typical gaming paradigm isn't considered anymore. Fuck that. ...... and, that's pretty much why I'm not a big Wii fan. It's generally waggle or nothing. They push it the point where you don't even get an option to control some games the traditional way. When some are argubably better off on a gamepad. It's a case of over-enthusism for waggle, like it's a one-size-fits-all solution to gaming. I don't think there's any danger of the "typical gaming paradigm" going away over night. As evidenced in this very thread, I think that makes up the majority. I see waggle as a means to an end. In most cases it sucks, but in a few cases where it actually feels like a more realistic control, I think it works well. Better fidelity and a good method of capturing body position will hopefully take this to the next level, but even that is just another means to an end. There are three major problems they have to overcome before they reach the nirvana state...imagine my fictional swordfighting game: first, there is no feedback. The clashing of swords will only be on the screen, and getting hit has no real world consequence (other than simply losing) forcing you to react to it. Second, you have to accept that balance is not something you are trying to achieve. If I'm either in better physical condition than you or am a trained fighter, the advantage is mine. Third, no fear. I learned in the military that the biggest problem with field exercises where you are trying to mimic a true battle scenario is that neither side is afraid to fail and will therefore take stupid and unacceptable risks, which completely alters the level of realism you experience. I don't think the can solve the first until we're in some form of virtual reality. The second is what will make this niche. The third isn't something many people would even want to change, for obvious reasons. I'm not even sure what I'm trying to say anymore. Except that I think this is all just part of the process of getting us to a totally different gaming paradigm. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ingmar on March 11, 2010, 12:08:07 PM people who want exact perfect fighting game simulation : people who want to play regular fighting games :: people who want exact perfect guitar playing simulation : people who want to play regular guitar controller games
You're a tiny little niche market. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on March 11, 2010, 12:27:06 PM You know what? I'd buy swordfighting with 1:1 waggle. If I liked golf properly, I'd buy 1:1 golf. Tennis. etc.
I can almost guarantee that the most popular 1:1 swordfighting game would be the Star Wars lightsaber one. Not entirely because gamesrs are nerds, but because it would be populated with fantastical characters, and a waggle/button combo would have your character jumping and flipping around like fucking Darth Maul on amphetamines, because people want that fantastical stuff which they can't do themselves. It's called escapism. but... People ultimately want to get inside the game, not fool around in different ways outside of it. The latter is ok in the short-term, but it gets old rather fast, especially with today's tech. and market. Oh, you mean the gaming industry through it's entire history to date? Yes, clearly people have gotten tired of that. :oh_i_see: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on March 11, 2010, 01:45:15 PM Sword-fighting 1:1 mechanics break down when you get to collisions. Real life sword-fighting works because you can parry by colliding with the enemy's sword and deflecting ti's force forward into another direction. You can't mimic this because you don't have the resistance to go with it. Furthermore, you have no resistance while cutting someone, so you have to have gameplay systems designed around "My sword is sitting right through your torso and not moving". It just presents way too many weird scenarios.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 11, 2010, 01:56:32 PM Sword-fighting 1:1 mechanics break down when you get to collisions. Real life sword-fighting works because you can parry by colliding with the enemy's sword and deflecting ti's force forward into another direction. You can't mimic this because you don't have the resistance to go with it. Furthermore, you have no resistance while cutting someone, so you have to have gameplay systems designed around "My sword is sitting right through your torso and not moving". It just presents way too many weird scenarios. This is overly negative and just plain ridiculous. Play more Wii Sports Resort and you'll see that there are possibilities in the space of 1:1 motion sensing and canned animations that can be both an interesting experience and a good game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 11, 2010, 02:28:23 PM People ultimately want to get inside the game, not fool around in different ways outside of it. The latter is ok in the short-term, but it gets old rather fast, especially with today's tech. and market. Oh, you mean the gaming industry through it's entire history to date? Yes, clearly people have gotten tired of that. :oh_i_see: No, I mean the various gimicky peripherals in the past that are/were nothing more than simple, short-term diversions. They may sell some boxes, but they were ultimately failures in the fickle gaming market. There's a difference between adding to gaming and just feeding it snacks. Sure, people like their snacks but they're not gonna turn down the Kobe beef entree. Anyways, gimme a 1:1 version of Bushido Blade and I'll be a happy man. Maybe use a balance board for movement and/or dodging. Make it ELO-based with ladders, tourneys, and pro. training modules both NPC and PC generated... maybe even a virtual dojo. For that matter, a virtual Wushu dojo (to study all its forms) wouldnt be a bad idea either. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 11, 2010, 02:32:22 PM I just want to point out that you dream of stuff that would be entirely unfun in an actual game. It's creepy. A 1:1 version of Bushido Blade would be god damn terrible.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: AutomaticZen on March 11, 2010, 02:46:53 PM No, I mean the various gimicky peripherals in the past that are/were nothing more than simple, short-term diversions. They may sell some boxes, but they were ultimately failures in the fickle gaming market. There's a difference between adding to gaming and just feeding it snacks. Sure, people like their snacks but they're not gonna turn down the Kobe beef entree. Anyways, gimme a 1:1 version of Bushido Blade and I'll be a happy man. Maybe use a balance board for movement and/or dodging. Make it ELO-based with ladders, tourneys, and pro. training modules both NPC and PC generated... maybe even a virtual dojo. For that matter, a virtual Wushu dojo (to study all its forms) wouldnt be a bad idea either. Just go take a kendo class or something. That's a lot of dreaming for something you can already do. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ingmar on March 11, 2010, 02:47:43 PM How is that Ride controller working out for you?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on March 11, 2010, 02:52:26 PM It's funny.. Skateboarding, guitar playing, and martial arts are all things I enjoy and do regularly. I'm sure I'm not alone. Yet, I've never desired games to simulate them. They're representations of those things are fun in and of themselves.
[edit] "Their", not "they're". Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Merusk on March 11, 2010, 03:52:30 PM You want a holodeck, we get it. But then you only THINK you want it, because it becomes "the outdoors" for the things you're asking for. You know, that think you're avoiding right now by playing video games instead of taking classes in any of this stuff.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on March 11, 2010, 04:04:05 PM The problem with trying to simulate a physical activity soley though a controller like this, is that you can't. Not with building in a huge amount of assumptions and very lame abstractions that clash with the original intent.
In modeling, say, a tennis game you don't have anything to really account for moment. So you make the characters automatically move to the ball or you assign it to a D-pad that isn't being used. Your game has failed right then and there without even getting to other issues. How much fidelity do you want to build in? You add some realistic physics based on racquet head speed, angle, timing, follow through, foot work (ohh wait), and then your game can no longer be played by the average Joe and probably gets enough of the physical modeling wrong to annoy someone familiar with the game. So, you have to abstract all of these aspects and allow for a wide range of possible swings, while most likely introducing the ability to game the system because your controller is imprecise. So now you have Wii tennis. Yay. :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 11, 2010, 08:03:32 PM You want a holodeck, we get it. But then you only THINK you want it, because it becomes "the outdoors" for the things you're asking for. You know, that think you're avoiding right now by playing video games instead of taking classes in any of this stuff. Classes for this stuff in many cases arent geographically or monetarily possible. Which ironically is the whole purpose of the "holodeck." So yah, you kinda retorted your own cynicism. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 11, 2010, 08:37:03 PM You want a holodeck, we get it. But then you only THINK you want it, because it becomes "the outdoors" for the things you're asking for. You know, that think you're avoiding right now by playing video games instead of taking classes in any of this stuff. Classes for this stuff in many cases arent geographically or monetarily possible. Which ironically is the whole purpose of the "holodeck." So yah, you kinda retorted your own cynicism.Title: Re: PS3 Post by: HaemishM on March 12, 2010, 11:14:44 AM For me, motion controls are all about adding to immersion. If that's done with true 1:1 motion mapping, so be it. If it takes a certain range of motions to trigger decent pre-scripted animations and actions, I'm fine with that too. I don't really give a fuck HOW it's done, so long as the added immersion is there and the game is worth a fuck. Most of the Wii waggle games neither added immersion nor were great games.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 12, 2010, 11:28:58 AM We all know the initial and most likely most popular will be the ones with a good amount of allowance. However we also should know, someone is going to try a 1:1 version.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 12, 2010, 12:58:42 PM For me, motion controls are all about adding to immersion. If that's done with true 1:1 motion mapping, so be it. If it takes a certain range of motions to trigger decent pre-scripted animations and actions, I'm fine with that too. I don't really give a fuck HOW it's done, so long as the added immersion is there and the game is worth a fuck. Most of the Wii waggle games neither added immersion nor were great games. QFT The answer to this question of whether motion controls is useful or not is really a sidestep from the conversation occurring here. Some games used motion control really well; Wii Sports Resort, No More Heroes, Winning Eleven. These games didn't have motion control sitting in for button controls. And only one of them attempts 1:1 control. The thing that brings them all together is that all of these games were *built* for motion control. It's not if the motion control is done 1:1 that makes it good. It's if the motion control fits in with the game that makes it good. If you own a Wii and haven't figured this out, you've been asleep at the wheel. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on March 12, 2010, 01:01:09 PM Unless you can plug something into my head so "I know Kung-fu" I don't want to flail around my living room trying to do a roundhouse kick on someone.
Plus I don't play games that I can't drink beer while playing. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 12, 2010, 01:26:13 PM Quote No More Heroes, Winning Eleven Quote These games didn't have motion control sitting in for button controls. You're wrong. In fact, it's PRECISELY what they had. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 12, 2010, 01:44:01 PM Sorry. Winning Eleven used the Wiimote as a laser pointer to direct the players on the field. It was really satisfying in the same way it is satisfying to tell your teammates where to go in a real sport. Also, I'm not 100% sure, but the kicking always felt analog to me. It's a much different experience playing that one.
And while No More Heroes used a lot of motion controls that were in fact binary, a lot of them were linked to the specific feeling Suda wanted you to feel at the moment you committed the action (I'm talking wrestling moves more than battery charging. Though that does fit in quite well here) in addition to player stance being linked directly to the direction the Wiimote was held. Tilted up for standard attacks, tilted down for sneakier attacks. It's all about how the game feels. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 12, 2010, 01:52:37 PM And buttons and analog sticks can do all of that and have for a long, long time. You're now making the argument that they're "different enough" for you. Which is fine, but don't reverse what you said 3 posts prior because someone called you on it, just say "yea, you're right, my bad" or whatever.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 12, 2010, 02:24:23 PM I never said that these games are "different enough". I'm saying that these games were made from the ground up for motion controls. That you can substitute buttons or analog sticks doesn't matter.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 12, 2010, 03:34:33 PM :facepalm:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on March 12, 2010, 04:22:49 PM This here thread got all messed up by that last tangent. Let's talk about something else. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Musashi on March 12, 2010, 04:58:58 PM Next month I am buying a PS3. I'd really like to find one of those backwards compatible ones so I can play all my games on my PC monitor (has hdmi in). So I've been keeping an eye out, and doing a little poking around. It seems they are out there to be had, but most commonly on ebay. I'm not sure I want to pay all that money for electronic equipment on ebay. That said, I'll do it if I have to. There were also a few on Craigslist which isn't ideal either. I'm wondering if they ever come into EBStop, Fry's, or what-have-you as refurbs and aren't immediately gouged to like 500$? Someplace I can bring it back in if it immediately dies? Or is there's a better way to get hold of one that I am unaware of? Are there any hardware upgrades that newer models have that the older ones don't? Are they worth not worrying about backwards compatibility?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on March 12, 2010, 05:03:27 PM Probably not easy finding one in Gamestop.
New hardware-wise, the newer ones just have larger hard drives and come with rumble controllers, I think. I don't know if BC is worth it. You could probably buy a new PS3 and a seperate PS2 for the same amount of cash. It's convenient though. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 12, 2010, 05:44:02 PM Next month I am buying a PS3. I'd really like to find one of those backwards compatible ones so I can play all my games on my PC monitor (has hdmi in). So I've been keeping an eye out, and doing a little poking around. It seems they are out there to be had, but most commonly on ebay. I'm not sure I want to pay all that money for electronic equipment on ebay. That said, I'll do it if I have to. There were also a few on Craigslist which isn't ideal either. I'm wondering if they ever come into EBStop, Fry's, or what-have-you as refurbs and aren't immediately gouged to like 500$? Someplace I can bring it back in if it immediately dies? Or is there's a better way to get hold of one that I am unaware of? Are there any hardware upgrades that newer models have that the older ones don't? Are they worth not worrying about backwards compatibility? They guys at my Gamestop know me. They're not exactly the nicest people in the world, but they know my videogame addiction is necessary for their business, so they *would have* ordered a 60gig from another store to their store. The GS they would have had it shipped from was 5 minutes from my friend's house, so she picked it up for me on one of her trips home instead. It's a hassle, but it's the only way to get a warranty (I'm pretty sure it's just 30 days, though). $350 isn't a bad price, either. That said, good luck making friends with GS employees. Especially if they're 360 fans. :-\ Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on March 12, 2010, 06:55:58 PM I'm thinking of trading my dust collecting video collection in at gamestop and buying a PS3 tomorrow. I have no need for my 360 or the games on it anymore, and I haven't touched them in years and GS is having a deal right now, I might save some cash.
I used to horde all my games as a collection, now for some reason, I see them all as a waste of space. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on March 12, 2010, 08:04:33 PM You should offer the games on f13. If your GS is anything like my EB, you'll get worse than a pittance for them.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on March 12, 2010, 09:49:16 PM I'd get a pittance for them regardless. Plus I wouldn't charge much for the games I have. You can get most of them for bargain prices I would imagine already.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on March 12, 2010, 10:19:38 PM They may still have the 50% bonus going on. Adds up. I traded in two Wii games that ending up being worth $52 (as opposed to the $40 worth toward FFXIII I would have gotten with their other deal).
I only really save games I love anymore or games that I plan on replaying. One and done games.. tend to go back if they're not RPGs. I don't tend to get much replay value from action titles. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: stray on March 12, 2010, 10:33:38 PM I can only keep things around if they have some intrinsic replay value. I have kept VC simply out of sheer adoration (although it's somewhat replayable).. But the only other story game is Dragon Age for dev created content. Whats left is a few fighter and racers. Don't care much for the replay/online value of shooters.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on March 13, 2010, 12:09:19 AM I keep my old/finished games since they're pretty close to worthless for trade-ins, and I can't be bothered with the effort of trying to sell them through forums etc.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on March 13, 2010, 06:48:33 AM They may still have the 50% bonus going on. Adds up. I traded in two Wii games that ending up being worth $52 (as opposed to the $40 worth toward FFXIII I would have gotten with their other deal). I only really save games I love anymore or games that I plan on replaying. One and done games.. tend to go back if they're not RPGs. I don't tend to get much replay value from action titles. They actually have about three deals going on right now that add bonus money towards FFXIII and PS3's. Gonna take advantage of that. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on March 13, 2010, 11:04:44 AM So I sold my old Xbox360 and Wii console. I sold a shit ton of old shitty PS2 games along with 2 or 3 Wii games and my 360 games, and believe it or not, a few Gamecube games. I sold a few extra controllers etc. as well.
Managed to score 400 bucks that converted into a PS3, Demon Souls, and FFXIII a long with 30 extra bucks in credit. All brand new. Not a bad haul. My receipt I took home is 3 feet long. I was going to take a picture of it but I'm pretty sure no one would care, and I would be ridiculed for owning PS2's The Bouncer. Now I've got a shit load of old Xbox (not 360) games that they wouldn't buy. Anyone want any? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: HaemishM on March 13, 2010, 11:16:00 AM Quote No More Heroes, Winning Eleven Quote These games didn't have motion control sitting in for button controls. You're wrong. In fact, it's PRECISELY what they had. Don't know about Winning Eleven (is that Pro Evolution in the US?) but No More Heroes DID have annoying button-press waggle in them. The only part of No More Heroes that wasn't annoying fuckfaced waggle was the goddamn boss battles (which is what the entire game should have consisted of). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: caladein on March 13, 2010, 10:48:53 PM Don't know about Winning Eleven (is that Pro Evolution in the US?) Yes. As for trade-ins, I usually don't bother with it unless there's a special going on (like when Amazon launched their trade-in program I cleaned a nice bit of shelf space). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on March 15, 2010, 06:51:48 AM About saving games, I used the fact that I don't trade in games twice this past weekend to help someone remember a game. We wanted to know what game was it that removed mana from the sequel (spurred by the FFXIII combat system), and after staring at the shelves for a bit we figured out it was Fable/II. Also one other, but I don't remember what we were confused about. Interestingly, I could probably remember if I went down and stared at the shelves for a bit.
Not ready to replace my TV for 3D. You guys let me know how it turns out. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on March 15, 2010, 01:37:22 PM Yeah, I'm not keen on needing to wear goggles to watch TV in my own home. Or have a pile of spare goggles sitting around in case someone else should happen to come and visit, and want to watch a movie.
Fuck goggles. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on March 15, 2010, 01:55:54 PM The Wii's IR sensor allows you to control the field ("free run") in Pro Evo / Winning Eleven in a way not possible on other consoles. These controls are not waggle and cannot be substituted with analogue sticks or buttons. To say otherwise means you haven't seen or played it.
If the PS3 gets PES 2011 in HD with the exact same Wii controls then it will be the greatest Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on March 15, 2010, 01:59:27 PM Ok.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on March 15, 2010, 03:29:06 PM Yeah, I'm not keen on needing to wear goggles to watch TV in my own home. Or have a pile of spare goggles sitting around in case someone else should happen to come and visit, and want to watch a movie. Fuck goggles. Especially since 3D glasses are supposed to cost around $150 each (according to Samsung's recently announced prices anyway). Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on March 15, 2010, 03:34:47 PM Are we ready to replace this thread with a subforum yet?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on March 15, 2010, 09:24:43 PM :why_so_serious:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on March 16, 2010, 11:20:31 AM It's absolutely brilliant of Sony not to have PS3's in stock at a lot of retailers on the day when one of their biggest releases hits. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on March 19, 2010, 05:57:35 AM well blah. Looks like PS3s still have freezing issues. My PS3 completely froze while playing Dragon Age last night.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on March 19, 2010, 06:27:40 AM At the risk of being labeled a fanboi, I can't think of any console I have had that hasn't frozen. Except maybe the Wii.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on March 19, 2010, 06:37:01 AM Eh the only reason I get annoyed is because haven't been playing consoles much. So out of the last 5 times I've gamed on it in the past 1.5 months it's frozen twice.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Draegan on March 19, 2010, 06:48:04 AM My brand new PS3 ha sound issues some times where I end up having to reboot it.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 19, 2010, 07:08:08 AM well blah. Looks like PS3s still have freezing issues. My PS3 completely froze while playing Dragon Age last night. Still? When did they ever have freezing issues that it would require the word "still?" Are you sure you aren't playing on a 360?Seriously though, out of thousands and thousands of hours of gaming on both of my PS3s, I can count on one hand how many times they've frozen. And it's generally due to the game. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: KallDrexx on March 19, 2010, 07:17:37 AM Still? When did they ever have freezing issues that it would require the word "still?" Are you sure you aren't playing on a 360? Seriously though, out of thousands and thousands of hours of gaming on both of my PS3s, I can count on one hand how many times they've frozen. And it's generally due to the game. Erm if you look a few pages back there are a couple of people talking about freezing in the latest firmware. That's the only reason I used the word "still", and even posted this. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 19, 2010, 07:20:56 AM Hm. Mine didn't, but during that clock "debacle" I didn't turn mine on, I just waited for the date to roll over. :|
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on March 19, 2010, 07:52:37 AM I'm willing to blame software to a degree, but if it happens in multiple games then it's HW+FW. I have a 60GB release PS3, though, so I can't be much help. Maybe people who wanted a cheaper PS3 got exactly what they asked for.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on March 19, 2010, 07:58:41 AM Mine's frozen once. Happened in Uncharted 2 during the tank scene, where there was a lot of terrain being deformed by a shell blast. 360 has frozen a couple times (Mass Effect), but I don't play it a lot. Wii, I don't think has frozen ever, but it doesn't actually have to try hard either.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: HaemishM on March 19, 2010, 09:53:07 AM At the risk of being labeled a fanboi, I can't think of any console I have had that hasn't frozen. Except maybe the Wii. You weren't playing the right games on your Wii then. Or the wrong ones. Far Cry not only froze on me, the freeze totally boofooed my save game. That was a blessing in disguise because it meant I didn't have to play Far Cry for the Wii anymore. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on March 19, 2010, 06:40:00 PM Why are you playing games like that on the Wii?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on March 19, 2010, 07:17:16 PM Why are you playing games like that on the Wii? He chose.. poorly. (http://www.johnqcasual.com/images/lastcrusade-knight.jpg) Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Pennilenko on March 20, 2010, 05:13:44 PM I finally get the wife to okay a PS3 after spending thousands of dollars on higher end matching PCs, and there is a damn artificial shortage.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Velorath on March 20, 2010, 08:15:06 PM It's not artificial, it's just poor planning. I'm pretty sure Sony would love to have ps3's on the shelf right now.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Ghambit on March 21, 2010, 10:57:01 AM I finally get the wife to okay a PS3 after spending thousands of dollars on higher end matching PCs, and there is a damn artificial shortage. Plenty of broke people on Ebay/Craigslist trying to dump their consoles. Typically for the price of a new one you can get all the controllers, cables, bigger HDD, and a plethora of games. Normally I wouldnt recommend doing this for a console, but for the PS3 I think it's fine. Xbox?? not so much. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on March 27, 2010, 06:29:18 AM I replaced my 60GB disk with a 320GB 7200RPM one. Was easy enough, just took a while. Now I can download that Dragon Age expansion.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on March 28, 2010, 06:08:35 PM Quote from: http://blog.us.playstation.com/2010/03/28/ps3-firmware-v3-21-update The next system software update for the PlayStation 3 (PS3) system will be released on April 1, 2010 (JST), and will disable the “Install Other OS” feature that was available on the PS3 systems prior to the current slimmer models, launched in September 2009. This feature enabled users to install an operating system, but due to security concerns, Sony Computer Entertainment will remove the functionality through the 3.21 system software update. Little early for an April 1st joke? Oh and if you don't update you won't get any PSN features and any bluray discs that require the firmware :grin: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Quinton on March 28, 2010, 11:47:21 PM Sounds an awful lot like:
1. oops there's a bug or potential bug in the hypervisor 2. fixing bugs is HARD 3. let's just remove the other os feature to reduce the risk, instead Kinda weak, really. Either their security is really bad (such that they can't secure the hypervisor against an untrusted client OS, kinda defeating the entire point of it), or they're too lazy to really fix it and are hoping nobody finds a local exploit to run untrusted code under their GameOS (which then could be used to attack the hypervisor, which apparently is not being fixed). Glad I picked up a ps3 slim now -- I'll use that for gaming and hang onto the older 60GB release model should I ever find the time for more linux-on-ps3 hacking. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on March 29, 2010, 02:01:15 AM I don't like the sound of disabling Linux either, but my Linux experience at launch was "Yay me, got it working, what now?" and I never went back to it. Did you guys use it for anything useful on the PS3?
P.S. Don't think this is going to hurt the PS3 compute cluster users much since they probably aren't forced to upgrade. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Trippy on March 29, 2010, 02:28:59 AM The PS3 hypervisor was hacked a few months ago. This is presumably part of Sony's response to that hack.
http://rdist.root.org/2010/01/27/how-the-ps3-hypervisor-was-hacked/ Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on March 29, 2010, 08:04:02 AM I don't like the sound of disabling Linux either, but my Linux experience at launch was "Yay me, got it working, what now?" and I never went back to it. Did you guys use it for anything useful on the PS3? P.S. Don't think this is going to hurt the PS3 compute cluster users much since they probably aren't forced to upgrade. Linux isn't really that great on PS3. If you're good with Linux you can get it optimized pretty well to run stuff like SNES emulators, but... why. I wonder what happens to people already with Linux partitions? Does it just not work anymore? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Kageh on March 29, 2010, 08:15:54 AM Yes, seems the partition is not accessible anymore afterwards, says so under the link fuser posted.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on March 29, 2010, 08:23:13 AM The PS3 hypervisor was hacked a few months ago. This is presumably part of Sony's response to that hack. http://rdist.root.org/2010/01/27/how-the-ps3-hypervisor-was-hacked/ Seem's like they are spooked and want to cut it off now. The percentage of ps3's is probably low where other os is totally removed from slims and never an option to access it. The "fat" stock has got to be gone and totally out of production. I wonder what happens to people already with Linux partitions? Does it just not work anymore? Data's gone with no way to access it again post update. Well besides removing the hard drive and using a PC to mount the partitions. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on March 29, 2010, 08:36:23 AM I can see the logic in not supporting a product that has been replaced. I didn't use it, I run linux on a PC like a normal person.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on March 29, 2010, 09:04:35 AM Without RSX access, Linux on the PS3 was stupid anyway. Keeping pirates out by shutting off access seems like a fine solution.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: BitWarrior on March 29, 2010, 10:58:46 AM Include more codec support (MKV, ISO, IMG, Flac, OGG, etc), samba shares and create an app marketplace, and pretty much any and all reasons to have linux installed are gone (for the normal public).
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on March 29, 2010, 11:06:30 AM Well, except for Linux nerds, they really don't need a reason to install it on any machine, they seem to like the process. :grin:
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on March 31, 2010, 10:05:13 PM Anyone running a router with dnsmasq feel free to add the following line (and yes that's my http server):
address=/fus01.ps3.update.playstation.net/74.207.232.74 Title: Re: PS3 Post by: ffc on March 31, 2010, 10:46:42 PM Anyone running a router with dnsmasq feel free to add the following line (and yes that's my http server): address=/fus01.ps3.update.playstation.net/74.207.232.74 I'm running Tomato and I found the dnsmasq entry field but what happens when I enter your line? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on April 01, 2010, 05:55:58 AM I'm running Tomato and I found the dnsmasq entry field but what happens when I enter your line? When a PS3 first attempts a connection to the internet it sends a http request to fus01.ps3.update.playstation.net to pull the file /update/ps3/list/us/ps3-updatelist.txt The update list defines what the current PS3 firmware is, in this case 3.21. In order to avoid the 3.21 update people are running proxy servers to replace the file but this is quite cumbersome. The dnsmasq changes the dns entry so when you attempt to retrieve the normal PS3 update file it will switch to a non Sony server. The non Sony server will respond saying 3.15 is the latest firmware and currently you can still log on the PSN and have full features. It's a quick and easy I'm sure at some point they will flip a switch requiring the 3.21 firmware. If you use the line and at any point in the future you want to install the update or require it you can just simply remove the line from dnsmasq and resume normal ps3 updates. You can check out the differences in the live (http://fus01.ps3.update.playstation.net/update/ps3/list/us/ps3-updatelist.txt) and my (http://74.207.232.74/update/ps3/list/us/ps3-updatelist.txt) ps3-updatelist.txt file. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on April 01, 2010, 06:33:27 AM I am confused, what are you guys doing? Bypassing the firmware updates?
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Yegolev on April 01, 2010, 07:26:16 AM Look out, here comes Principal Skinner!
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: waffel on April 06, 2010, 09:54:58 PM Welp, looks like my 5 month old PS3 (with at max 50 hours of 'blu ray laser' time) no longer reads Blu Rays.
Put in FF13, watched the screen turn black, noticed it was just sitting there doing nothing. Got out of the 'game' and took out disc, put it back in, and nada. Tried other games, nothing. Tried CDs/DVDs and they play fine. Reset settings. Got into Safemode. Reset settings and fixed a corrupted file system. No luck. Even restored system to factory settings and still nothing (wiped the drive in the process) Needless to say, I'm quite fucking pissed. The PS3 is kept fairly clean, no dust build up in any of the back ports, I use it mainly for movies/netflix/pandora. I rarely use the blu ray drive. So my options look like: Buy can of compressed air and go to town on the air ports and maybe inside the drive Try to fix/clean the laser myself Send it into Sony and see it in a month. Disappointing to say the least. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: schild on April 07, 2010, 06:59:18 AM Bad luck, guy.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on April 07, 2010, 07:03:11 AM Welp, looks like my 5 month old PS3 (with at max 50 hours of 'blu ray laser' time) no longer reads Blu Rays. Put in FF13, watched the screen turn black, noticed it was just sitting there doing nothing. Got out of the 'game' and took out disc, put it back in, and nada. Tried other games, nothing. Tried CDs/DVDs and they play fine. Reset settings. Got into Safemode. Reset settings and fixed a corrupted file system. No luck. Even restored system to factory settings and still nothing (wiped the drive in the process) Needless to say, I'm quite fucking pissed. The PS3 is kept fairly clean, no dust build up in any of the back ports, I use it mainly for movies/netflix/pandora. I rarely use the blu ray drive. So my options look like: Buy can of compressed air and go to town on the air ports and maybe inside the drive Try to fix/clean the laser myself Send it into Sony and see it in a month. Disappointing to say the least. Dude I just bought Bad Company 2 for PS3 so I could play it with you. Wtf lame. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on April 07, 2010, 04:06:35 PM Welp, looks like my 5 month old PS3 (with at max 50 hours of 'blu ray laser' time) no longer reads Blu Rays. Isn't there a 1 year warranty? Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on April 07, 2010, 04:22:17 PM Welp, looks like my 5 month old PS3 (with at max 50 hours of 'blu ray laser' time) no longer reads Blu Rays. Isn't there a 1 year warranty? There is. I had my PS3 sent back over 6months in because I found the system fan too loud. They shipped out a whole new replacement unit for free and noted the warranty on the replacement is the 1year from the original purchase date. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: waffel on April 07, 2010, 04:30:41 PM Well, now the PS3 won't read DVDs, sometimes reads CDs, and sometimes reads blu rays but never finishes loading one.
Going to be calling Sony tomorrow. :sad: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on June 30, 2010, 08:17:43 AM Looks like it's pay service time!
http://us.playstation.com/playstation-plus/ Anyone sign up for this yet? Or figure if it's even worth it. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on June 30, 2010, 08:51:19 AM Out of the features listed (spoilered below) the beta invites and store discounts seem like the only items on there worth anything. Certainly not $50/yr worth though depending on what betas and what games are discounted
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: fuser on June 30, 2010, 09:08:38 AM Depends, Wipeout HD is free if you pay for the service, also a free
There's also an incentive deal, if you pay for one or twelve months you get an additional 3 months free. The first few months better be packed with some good deals. Still no cross game voicechat :uhrr: Title: Re: PS3 Post by: jakonovski on June 30, 2010, 09:19:47 AM There's a catch on the "free" games. Turns out you're merely renting them, because as soon as you stop paying you lose the "free" games.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on June 30, 2010, 09:22:43 AM Personally, I don't care for Wipeout or Warhawk and that's why I think it comes down to what games are free/discounted. Admittedly it could be really great or a big bust, and it's just not enough (and I don't think they'll make a habit of offering free games or good discounts on items I'd personally want). Just looking over this months discounted and free game list, the only thing that seems alright is the Fat Princess DLC for 20% off.
Now, if they offered discounts on official PS3 gear (headset, mini keyboard, etc) that would be something I'd go for and I'd actually buy Sony's items instead of using 3rd party. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on June 30, 2010, 09:29:37 AM Fuck, or even just ONE free movie rental per month included would have been awesome.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on June 30, 2010, 09:32:10 AM Fuck, or even just ONE free movie rental per month included would have been awesome. That would have been great as well, absolutely. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: JWIV on June 30, 2010, 09:35:39 AM Fuck, or even just ONE free movie rental per month included would have been awesome. That would have been great as well, absolutely. This is irritating me the more I think about it. The amount of shit Sony leaves on the table drives me bonkers and it all stems from the fact that they simply can not get the divisions to agree on fuck all. A perfect opportunity to highlight their movie service and to reiterate the point of the PS3 being a complete entertainment solution, and instead, they fall right back into limiting the PS3 as a gaming console and Playstation Plus as strictly a gaming service. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on June 30, 2010, 11:26:04 AM How about the ability to install games to the HD, I friggen hate loading disks (damn you netflix!). I don't buy many games but the choice is about 3x easier to make if it is something off of psn vs. a dvd.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Azazel on July 05, 2010, 07:21:58 PM You'll always have to put a disc in. Basic anti-piracy measure.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on July 14, 2010, 08:53:27 AM So, my Sixaxis controller finally got to the point where I have to keep it plugged in to use. That said, I'm looking for a new controller and thinking I'll get a Dual Shock 3 bundle with either Resistance 2 or Killzone 2. Any opinions on which would be the better game? I figure for ~$15 more than buying a controller alone that trying out KZ2 or Res2 would be worth it.
Also, anyone know if places like Best Buy who do electronics recycling accept PS3 controllers, if not are there any suggestions on who would handle that? I'd rather toss it to a recycling plant then just dump it in the trash. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Salamok on July 14, 2010, 09:18:07 AM I have read 1 recent review that says the latest round of dual shock controllers are not the same quality as previous controllers. There are aftermarket replacement batteries available for your existing controller for under $10. I think I would give that a shot while biding my time for the new tron controllers.
Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on July 14, 2010, 09:28:44 AM Thanks for that heads up, I didn't know about the new controllers. Also, and I don't know why, I thought I remember hearing that Sixaxis batteries weren't replaceable. Though a quick google search does show replacement batteries and that will be the route I take for the time being.
Also, there are some links of Sony stating they'll replace Sixaxis controllers for free when the battery dies. Anyone know if that is still true? That would be nice after new controllers come out. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: rrazcueta on July 14, 2010, 11:14:56 PM So, my Sixaxis controller finally got to the point where I have to keep it plugged in to use. That said, I'm looking for a new controller and thinking I'll get a Dual Shock 3 bundle with either Resistance 2 or Killzone 2. Any opinions on which would be the better game? I figure for ~$15 more than buying a controller alone that trying out KZ2 or Res2 would be worth it. Also, anyone know if places like Best Buy who do electronics recycling accept PS3 controllers, if not are there any suggestions on who would handle that? I'd rather toss it to a recycling plant then just dump it in the trash. Though both are kind of "meh" after playing really good shooters, KZ2 is the one I liked more. It's just really pretty, and the online multiplayer is actually good. Unfortunately it's hard to keep playing KZ2 online because it's just so harsh. Kind of wish there was a FFA mode. Warning: if you're used to easy peasy aiming like kb/m then avoid KZ2 like the plague. It has a momentum based rotation that is hard to adjust to. It makes you feel like a lumbering hulk, so it's hard to adjust after playing something like BFBC2. If you are interested in R2 I don't think it'd be bad for $15. It's fun enough, and if you get a chance to play it online co-op you should. It's kind of sparse online in that game now, but the online co-op is awesome for a bit. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Segoris on July 15, 2010, 06:47:11 AM Thanks for the feedback.
As an update though, it ended up not being the battery. The controller worked while plugged into the PS3 but not without being plugged in, this is why I figured it was simply a dead battery. When I got home though, I thought that since when pushing the PS button on the controller the 4 lights at the top would still blink meaning it must still have some charge if it was able to do that and figured that it must have been because I just updated to the latest PSN version. That was the problem, the PSN update de-synched my controller and I just needed to push the little reset button (I didn't even know about this button, though being a wireless controller it makes sense) on the back of the controller while it was plugged in. So no KZ2 or R2 but that's probably for the best right now with the backlog of games I already have. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on July 15, 2010, 08:07:53 AM Uhh.. what the fuck did they do with the PSN? I can't even log into PSN online. What kind of website fucking lags out my entire PC?
FACK. Who designed this website? Jesus H. This is horrible. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Mrbloodworth on July 15, 2010, 08:45:36 AM Uhh.. what the fuck did they do with the PSN? I can't even log into PSN online. What kind of website fucking lags out my entire PC? FACK. Who designed this website? Jesus H. This is horrible. http://us.playstation.com/ - That? Runs fine for me. But ti does use a large dose of flash, but nothing performance chugging. Title: Re: PS3 Post by: Rasix on July 15, 2010, 08:51:36 AM It's interesting. It chugs and wont' even load the log in on my home pc, but my crappy work laptop loads it just fine. Just a horrible, horrible designed site. Finally figured out how to change my billing info. DEATHSPANK INC!
|