Title: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: UnSub on May 08, 2009, 05:30:24 AM New Playboy browser MMO in production. (http://www.joltonline.com/news/10_jolt_announces_playboy_manager)
Don't worry - you don't have to play as a bunny. You get to be their manager. Official site (http://www.playboymanager.com/) - apparently one of the classes is 'douchebag', given the character art. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Dion on May 08, 2009, 05:59:18 AM Who will play this :ye_gods:
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: IainC on May 08, 2009, 06:03:55 AM Quote In Playboy Manager, you play a crack talent agent :drill: :drillf: :drill: Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Yegolev on May 08, 2009, 06:27:50 AM Quote In Playboy Manager, you play a crack talent agent :drill: :drillf: :drill: Fantastic. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Azaroth on May 08, 2009, 06:59:54 AM Managing talent with crack?
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Murgos on May 08, 2009, 07:02:56 AM No. Managing the talented cracks of your clients.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Ratman_tf on May 08, 2009, 07:55:27 AM Quote Playboy Manager is a continuous game designed to be played in short bursts from any Internet browser at any time. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: WayAbvPar on May 08, 2009, 08:37:28 AM Quote Playboy Manager is a continuous game designed to be played in short bursts from any Internet browser at any time. :awesome_for_real: I have been playing that since I got internet access. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: patience on May 08, 2009, 09:25:56 AM If this game can't be torrented it will fail...
..or not. :hello_thar: Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: schild on May 08, 2009, 09:29:09 AM Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: tmp on May 08, 2009, 10:20:17 AM Official site (http://www.playboymanager.com/) - apparently one of the classes is 'douchebag', given the character art. I appreciate subtle self-derogatory humour that's giving the "manager" featured there a sickly, greenish pale skin. Lack of hairy palms is bit of a letdown, though.Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: patience on May 08, 2009, 10:40:34 AM Quote Combining the best elements of trading card and turn-based gaming, Playboy Manager is the only online game to feature exclusive content from Playboy, including videos and photos of breathtaking Playboy models. I'm not familiar entirely with their audience but I doubt this won't be a disappointment for them. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Lantyssa on May 08, 2009, 12:06:11 PM If the model on their front page is any indication of the content, I can't see how it will go over well. Also they're the ones that did that crappy Zork browser game.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: tmp on May 08, 2009, 12:50:15 PM If the model on their front page is any indication of the content, I can't see how it will go over well. What do you mean?Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Mrbloodworth on May 08, 2009, 01:28:39 PM If the model on their front page is any indication of the content, I can't see how it will go over well. Also they're the ones that did that crappy Zork browser game. It changes with a refresh. Don't ask how i know. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Ghambit on May 08, 2009, 02:03:08 PM This would be cool if they did it like Leisure Suit Larry set loose in the Playboy mansion.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: sam, an eggplant on May 08, 2009, 02:25:25 PM Boobies are always relevant, and I don't see why an adult-themed casual browser game wouldn't be successful, if it didn't suck. But of course this will suck.
If it were me, I would take a hint from the second life prostitutes and offer a service facilitating that sort of interaction with highly customizable sexualized anatomically correct (or anatomically exaggerated) avatars, jap dating-game style "gameplay", and integrated VOIP. Johns pay per minute or per sex act, depending on the whore's wishes, and whores are paid in a standard affiliate relationship, but they would not be required to charge anything. Call it "the playboy's party" and have offer varied mise en scene like the playboy mansion, the playboy grotto, a highschool locker room, the back seat of a parked convertible, shit like that. Wrap it around a social-networking type shell, so everybody can keep in touch, review the whores' performance, talk about their cats, and so on. If there's one thing we've learned, it's that "value" is not a major impediment to guys trying to masturbate. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Musashi on May 08, 2009, 02:54:09 PM I don't think Playboy wants to go there. Their image is more about being the kind of guy who doesn't have to pay for it. You just described Red Light District Online.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Goreschach on May 08, 2009, 03:00:02 PM Boobies are always relevant, and I don't see why an adult-themed casual browser game wouldn't be successful, if it didn't suck. This isn't the 50's, it's not like porn is hard to find now. A game like that would be superfluous. The reason that Second Life and its ilk are successful is because they cater to the freakjobs. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: sam, an eggplant on May 08, 2009, 03:01:42 PM Playboy was behind the times with affiliate sites and such; that's why they purchased spice and ICS a couple of years ago, purveyors of hotel pay per view porn and owners of such fine sites as gofuckyourself.com, bigsausagepizza.com, cumoneileen.com, orgynation, amateurpages, 10dollarlesbians, clubjenna, etc. They wanted to get into affiliates badly to compete with hustler, bangbros, etc, but flubbed it, and are now reportedly selling them off. Christy Hefner leaving was not a good sign.
Playboy very badly wants that hardcore revenue, but you're right in that they don't want to deface the playboy brand with it, because at this point, that brand is all they have. Then again, if they don't do something, this recession will put them out of business. Porno hasn't been hard to find for a long time. Phonesex lines and camwhores still do quite well, however, because they offer real human interaction. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Lantyssa on May 08, 2009, 03:40:11 PM If the model on their front page is any indication of the content, I can't see how it will go over well. What do you mean?It changes with a refresh. Ah. Because the model they showed was scary when I looked.Don't ask how i know. How do you know? ;D Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Grimwell on May 08, 2009, 03:41:57 PM It's hard not to subscribed to their twitter page for this promotion. It sends comments immediately. I tested it.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Redgiant on May 08, 2009, 07:51:36 PM Bet it only supports WASD with no mouse. And numpad for you lefties.
Who would want to occupy both hands? Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: UnSub on May 08, 2009, 08:41:13 PM Playboy was behind the times with affiliate sites and such; that's why they purchased spice and ICS a couple of years ago, purveyors of hotel pay per view porn and owners of such fine sites as gofuckyourself.com, bigsausagepizza.com, cumoneileen.com, orgynation, amateurpages, 10dollarlesbians, clubjenna, etc. They wanted to get into affiliates badly to compete with hustler, bangbros, etc, but flubbed it, and are now reportedly selling them off. Christy Hefner leaving was not a good sign. Playboy very badly wants that hardcore revenue, but you're right in that they don't want to deface the playboy brand with it, because at this point, that brand is all they have. Then again, if they don't do something, this recession will put them out of business. Porno hasn't been hard to find for a long time. Phonesex lines and camwhores still do quite well, however, because they offer real human interaction. This has been educational. I liked how one of the sign-up benefits was a chance to win a lifetime sub to Playboy. I thought, "How long is Playboy still going to be around, anyway?". I'd say it isn't going to work because the lifestyle Playboy tries to sell - classy and somewhat innocent sleaze, or something like it - is a bit outdated. Especially since hardcore is so easy to find for free. A MMO is going to keep people coming for a look at some boobs, but as AoC found out, boobs don't keep an audience post-launch. And if it is even vaguely successful I'd expect someone to copy the basic mechanics and make a more explicit version - Virtual Pimp Online - where you 'manage talent' in more detailed ways. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Big Gulp on May 08, 2009, 08:51:33 PM I'd say it isn't going to work because the lifestyle Playboy tries to sell - classy and somewhat innocent sleaze, or something like it - is a bit outdated. Especially since hardcore is so easy to find for free. With stuff like YouPorn and RedTube I can't fathom how any nudie mags stay in business, regardless of how hardcore they are. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Signe on May 08, 2009, 10:00:49 PM Because most people men them for the articles.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: schild on May 08, 2009, 10:25:15 PM Because most people men them for the articles. I don't anything for men. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Ratman_tf on May 08, 2009, 10:48:33 PM Because most people men them for the articles. I don't anything for men. That's not what I herd. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: schild on May 09, 2009, 12:50:11 AM Because most people men them for the articles. I don't anything for men.Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: squirrel on May 09, 2009, 01:04:04 AM Who will play this :ye_gods: Erhm. Um. Yeah. I will. Well, I'd beta it. Who knows, the breasts might be totally imba. And apparently it's cool. No word if they'll tell the wife though. (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/119380/temp.png) Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: sam, an eggplant on May 09, 2009, 07:08:16 AM I really think the secret to success in an adult MMO isn't to sell hardcore pornography but to facilitate hardcore interactions between players with no set prices on the marketplace. Whores may charge more to do certain things, or because they or their avatar is more attractive, or for voicechat or live webcam. Or there may be no money at all changing place, with an established couple using it for convenient long distance mutual masturbation. Or a singles line, with random horndogs getting off on each other. If the platform is good, all of these things could grow from it, and monetization would be easy because again, one of the few things people will pay for on the internet is an orgasm.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: UnSub on May 09, 2009, 07:27:54 AM I'd say it isn't going to work because the lifestyle Playboy tries to sell - classy and somewhat innocent sleaze, or something like it - is a bit outdated. Especially since hardcore is so easy to find for free. With stuff like YouPorn and RedTube I can't fathom how any nudie mags stay in business, regardless of how hardcore they are. Not everyone has the internet or access to high speed broadband. And, same with other printed materials, some people just prefer paper. But yeah, it is why newspapers, magazines et al are going broke - because the internet gives up everything and much quicker / convenient than it takes to release another paper issue. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Signe on May 09, 2009, 08:31:41 AM Because most people men them for the articles. I don't anything for men. Oh shuddup you. You know what I meant. Don't make me use that edit feature! Dammit. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Sir T on May 09, 2009, 09:53:10 AM Boobies are always relevant, and I don't see why an adult-themed casual browser game wouldn't be successful, if it didn't suck. But of course this will suck. If it were me, I would take a hint from the second life prostitutes and offer a service facilitating that sort of interaction with highly customizable sexualized anatomically correct (or anatomically exaggerated) avatars, jap dating-game style "gameplay", and integrated VOIP. Johns pay per minute or per sex act, depending on the whore's wishes, and whores are paid in a standard affiliate relationship, but they would not be required to charge anything. Call it "the playboy's party" and have offer varied mise en scene like the playboy mansion, the playboy grotto, a highschool locker room, the back seat of a parked convertible, shit like that. Wrap it around a social-networking type shell, so everybody can keep in touch, review the whores' performance, talk about their cats, and so on. If there's one thing we've learned, it's that "value" is not a major impediment to guys trying to masturbate. So what you're saying is... they should offer a virtual Penis THAT REALLY WORKS!!! Gotcha. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Nevermore on May 10, 2009, 06:10:42 PM Teledildonics is so last year.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: schild on May 10, 2009, 06:12:44 PM Teledildonics is so last year. Try 3-4 years ago.Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Rendakor on May 10, 2009, 06:14:47 PM Teledildonics is so last year. I have no idea what that is. But I'm not sure I want to google it either. :ye_gods:Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Lantyssa on May 11, 2009, 07:42:22 AM "Reach out and touch [yourself]."
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: tmp on May 11, 2009, 07:56:45 AM It's fufme (http://www.welookdoyou.com/fufme/index.shtml.html)* for those who missed the joke.
*) url not necessarily SFW Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Slyfeind on May 11, 2009, 12:55:56 PM Hehehe! Teledildonics still makes me giggle. Hehehehehehe. Teledildonics.
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: Engels on May 11, 2009, 09:57:30 PM Perfecting the science. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDVlgI76tDw) Sorta NSFW for obviously sexual toys
Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: MrHat on May 12, 2009, 06:36:53 AM I used a teledildonics reference once for a patent application.
No joke. Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: UnSub on May 12, 2009, 07:05:58 PM I used a teledildonics reference once for a patent application. No joke. The patent on fleshlights must be moneyhats for you. :grin: Title: Re: Playboy continues to struggle in remaining relevant... Post by: VainEldritch on May 17, 2009, 02:26:36 AM As in *Whack* *Whack* *Whacketty* *whack* beater...? Sorry, that "crack manager" line on the site put me in smut mode. |