Title: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stu on October 28, 2008, 08:22:20 PM It's available on Hulu.com! Man, I love the Halloween season, and I love this movie. For me, this is the greatest horror flick ever made (and it doesn't even contain female nudity [or females, for that matter, but I digress]). The film takes it's time getting to where it needs to be- a lost art in modern horror. I could go on, but I'm sure most here have seen this movie at least once. I own The Thing on DVD, but whatevs.
P.S. Christine and The Blob remake are also on Hulu. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: sidereal on October 28, 2008, 09:06:21 PM Gave me nightmares for 12 years. Awesome movie.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Slyfeind on October 28, 2008, 09:09:40 PM I never understood why the one guy flipped off the other guy with his ring finger.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Samwise on October 28, 2008, 09:41:50 PM I just saw this for the first time, thanks to Hulu. Good flick. I'm guessing it's not coincidence that the whole blood test thing reminded me of BSG.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: schild on October 28, 2008, 11:21:33 PM This movie really shines in high-def.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stray on October 29, 2008, 12:13:16 AM The game really pissed me off though. I remember it being... overwhelming.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on October 29, 2008, 12:40:37 AM There is no bigger Carpenter fan than myself. Love this movie. By the way the short story is great as well and much closer to the movie than the lame '51 version was.
Adrienne Barbeau was at the local library today but I couldn't make it. I was going to ask her to sign my Escape from New York. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Ingmar on October 30, 2008, 05:39:22 PM Obligatory linking of this whenever The Thing is mentioned:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7AH4JyuNs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7AH4JyuNs) Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: FatuousTwat on October 30, 2008, 08:20:23 PM Obligatory linking of this whenever The Thing is mentioned: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7AH4JyuNs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT7AH4JyuNs) That is fucking awesome. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: sidereal on October 30, 2008, 09:17:36 PM So awesome.
Were those official John Carpenter's The Thing action figures? Do want. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Johny Cee on October 30, 2008, 09:23:23 PM So awesome. Were those official John Carpenter's The Thing action figures? Do want. Those were GI Joes. You'll notice Shipwreck by the bar most of the time. Boy, I wish Carpenter could get his shit together. That guy used to take a shoestring budget and do weird and interesting things.... Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on November 01, 2008, 07:35:12 PM He hasn't really done anything since Ghosts of Mars. He's attached to a couple of projects that are supposedly about to start shooting, dunno if that's really going to happen though.
I watched They Live again the other day. The part where Piper is in the store where all the snooty aliens are talking to normal humans is so fucking funny. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Riggswolfe on November 03, 2008, 06:34:36 AM The Thing is John Carpenter at his best. It's also probably my favorite Russell/Carpenter team up, even over Escape from New York.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Evildrider on November 03, 2008, 03:24:49 PM What? Big Trouble in Little China was the best evar! :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stu on November 03, 2008, 07:16:38 PM Big Trouble in Little China is truly awesome, but in a different way. It's more :hulk_rock: than :eek3:.
They Live is a good bridge between the two. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: SnakeCharmer on November 03, 2008, 07:19:39 PM I've always enjoyed In The Mouth of Madness as Carpenters best work. Still gives me the willies when I watch it.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Zetleft on November 03, 2008, 09:37:02 PM All great movies but wheres the Prince of Darkness love. :drill:
That one scene when she opens her eyes still creeps me out. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stray on November 03, 2008, 10:05:05 PM God, we all have our favorites, I guess. Mine would be Escape from NY. Been hunting for a door sized snake plissken poster for years.
Escape, The Thing, Big Trouble.. We can all agree that Kurt Russell was pretty awesome back in the day at least. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on November 04, 2008, 12:38:40 AM I just finished rewatching Prince of Darkness 5 minutes ago. Weird ooze dripping upward and pooling on the ceiling, demon creature reaching through a mirror into a watery anti-world. Really creepy movie, gives me the willies more than any other carpenter film. Thanks God they gave Dennis Dunn all the homo jokes to lighten the mood.
Also "You will not be saved by the God Plutonium" is probably my favorite line from any movie, ever, and it's not even spoken. The idea of God, Satan and science all sort of comingling is ripe territory. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Riggswolfe on November 04, 2008, 06:21:11 AM God, we all have our favorites, I guess. Mine would be Escape from NY. Been hunting for a door sized snake plissken poster for years. Escape, The Thing, Big Trouble.. We can all agree that Kurt Russell was pretty awesome back in the day at least. Yeah, those two were great together. I can't think of any other actor/director team ups that were so full of win. And when I said the Thing is my favorite, it's something like 100% - 99%. So it's not a total blowout. Big Trouble in particular grew on me over the years, especially when I realized that Kurt Russell is the sidekick and not the hero of the movie. It made the whole thing click better for me. Of course, he thinks he's the hero but that's part of the charm. I wonder if Prince of Darkness is on DvD. I didn't know that was a Carpenter movie. My main memories of that movie are Donald Pleasance and the weird vial of "evil" in the basement of the church. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stray on November 04, 2008, 10:18:17 AM Yeah, those two were great together. I can't think of any other actor/director team ups that were so full of win. OK, that I can't agree with. :-) (http://tokumeikan.com/yojimbo2.jpg) (http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2007/11/brando%20kazan%20copy.jpg) (http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2007/11/Scorsese%20De%20Niro.jpg) Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: sidereal on November 04, 2008, 10:55:23 AM It's on.
(http://www.channel4.com/4laughs/media/images/caption/2007/February/C0072_wk7_clerksII_L.jpg) Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Evildrider on November 04, 2008, 11:17:35 AM I wonder if Prince of Darkness is on DvD. I didn't know that was a Carpenter movie. My main memories of that movie are Donald Pleasance and the weird vial of "evil" in the basement of the church. It's part of the "Apocolypse Trilogy" that Carpenter wanted.. They don't share actors or storylines really, but they were The Thing, Prince of Darkness, and In the Mouth of Madness. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: schild on November 04, 2008, 01:46:31 PM Yeah, those two were great together. I can't think of any other actor/director team ups that were so full of win. OK, that I can't agree with. :-) How could you miss John Woo and Chow Yun Fat? Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stray on November 04, 2008, 02:16:56 PM I've think I've stated before that I..... kinda don't like them a whole lot. :awesome_for_real:
Well, I like Chow Yun Fat. But as far as Woo goes, it's just not my thing, besides the cool choreography. And perhaps my favorite film from them (Hard Boiled) is perhaps their corniest and over-the-top. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: ahoythematey on November 04, 2008, 10:06:56 PM I think Chow Yun Fat is an amazing actor that rarely gets the kind of roles that would show his range, and John Woo is one of those many shackles.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: apocrypha on November 04, 2008, 11:13:45 PM I just finished rewatching Prince of Darkness 5 minutes ago. Weird ooze dripping upward and pooling on the ceiling, demon creature reaching through a mirror into a watery anti-world. Really creepy movie, gives me the willies more than any other carpenter film. Thanks God they gave Dennis Dunn all the homo jokes to lighten the mood. Also "You will not be saved by the God Plutonium" is probably my favorite line from any movie, ever, and it's not even spoken. The idea of God, Satan and science all sort of comingling is ripe territory. OK that sounds awesome. And it is available on dvd, I've just ordered it :) Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stu on November 04, 2008, 11:28:42 PM Prince of Darkness has always been badass in my view, but... Holeee fuck?! I never realized that was Alice Cooper playing the maniacal homeless guy until reading the film credits just now.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: justdave on November 05, 2008, 01:59:59 PM Prince of Darkness has always been badass in my view, but... Holeee fuck?! I never realized that was Alice Cooper playing the maniacal homeless guy until reading the film credits just now. that's the one thing that puts PoD behind The Thing for sheer creepy in my book...Thing is unrelenting, but the bit in the middle where Alice Cooper stabs someone with a bicycle kind of...jars. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: apocrypha on November 05, 2008, 11:57:53 PM Watched this lastnight, cool film, it's dated more than The Thing has though - too many 80's hairdos and mustaches! And the bicycle thing was at least novel. I've never seen someone killed with half a bicycle in a film before :)
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on November 06, 2008, 01:18:11 AM The great thing about that is the lingering shot of the guy propped up on the bicycle dead.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: DraconianOne on November 06, 2008, 04:41:11 AM Funnily enough, I watched Prince of Darkness a couple of weeks ago. It is a good movie despite itself - some of the dialogue is fucking awful, the acting is terrible (apart from Donald Pleasance and Victor Wong) but the story and storytelling is brilliant. And that ending just creeps me out no end.
Made up for watching Village of the Damned a few weeks before that. That's going in the other thread. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: NowhereMan on November 06, 2008, 05:12:46 AM Oh God, Prince of Darkness. I saw that when I was about 10 and it scared the crap out of me, I think I'd actually repressed memories of it until just now. Not sure how it would stand up but I remember it being seriously creepy, not full of shock horror but still very fucking scary.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: justdave on November 06, 2008, 07:23:05 PM I think my biggest thing with The Thing was that I saw it when I was a ute, and the combinition of paranoia (which I didin't quite get) plus blood monster burnt some sort of imprimatur of scared on me, so even when I watch it now, it's kind of like 'Oh, yeah, there's Keith David, he was pretty good in OH FUCK THIS IS WHERE THE BLOOD JUMPS OUT OF THE DISH'.
Same thing with The Fog, which has one of the single greatest camera shots ever filmed. I actually saw PoD after Big Trouble, so I didn't really take it seriously (Egg is teaching a physics class?) until the jar of devil, and it didn't really register until the end scene, which was awesome. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: WindupAtheist on November 09, 2008, 07:06:10 PM John Carpenter's The Thing is the best horror movie ever put on film, period.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stu on January 30, 2009, 10:28:23 PM So, looks like a prequel is in the works. Hrmm...
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/universal-officially-announces-the-thing-from-new-caprica.php (http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/universal-officially-announces-the-thing-from-new-caprica.php) Quote This isn’t necessarily new news, but it does move recent rumors into the realm of official announcement. Universal has hired Ronald Moore to write the big-budget “remake/re-imagining/prequel” of John Carpenter’s The Thing. They’ve also hired on Matthijs Van Heijningen to direct. Variety confirms the film will take place in the Norwegian camp that first discovered, housed, and was destroyed by the shape-shifting bastard from the nether regions of space. This info has been floating around as rumor for a while, but now that it’s official the same comments, questions, and issues remain. The best part of the announcement (the only good part actually) is the involvement of Moore. The man has shown his brilliance for the past few years with his Battlestar Galactica reboot, so there’s a chance this could actually be interesting. Van Heijningen is a wild card, as his previous credits consist solely of commercials. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on January 31, 2009, 12:13:09 AM Spoiler: They all die and the thing is frozen in ice. :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: UnSub on January 31, 2009, 08:10:42 AM Spoiler: They all die and the thing is frozen in ice. :oh_i_see: ... except for the dog. There is no way that this prequel film can live up to "The Thing". No way. It isn't needed to explain anything. Bad stuff happened at the Norwegian camp. That's it, end of story. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Big Gulp on January 31, 2009, 08:28:43 AM There is no way that this prequel film can live up to "The Thing". No way. It isn't needed to explain anything. Bad stuff happened at the Norwegian camp. That's it, end of story. I love how all these remakes are farmed out to McMovie directors and fucking scabs. Who in their right mind would even want to try and better The Thing, Halloween, or Texas Chainsaw Massacre? They're classics for a goddamned reason. Remakes and sequels are where you separate actual directors from hacks. Case in point: David Fincher and Alien 3. He didn't say, "Hey, I'm going to remake Aliens, but bigger and better!". He's smart enough to know that you're not going to out-action Cameron, so he goes a different route. You get some hack like Brett Ratner, though, and he'll reshoot Man Hunter with a higher budget and just call it Red Dragon. Not an ounce of shame that he's taking sloppy seconds from Michael Mann, because again, he's a scab hack who's just in it for the paycheck. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stray on January 31, 2009, 08:43:23 AM One horror remake I wouldn't mind seeing (not to say one is planned) is Poltergeist. The world needs a good haunted house movie again. And umm... it might be one of the cases that'll benefit from modern effects. Besides, it's not classic enough as to seem untouchable, like Chainsaw. It could probably be improved upon.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: HaemishM on January 31, 2009, 09:40:26 AM There is zero fucking reason to make a prequel to The Thing, and especially not something by that grabass Ronald Moore. I'm sure halfway through the movie, 3 of the residents of the camp will turn out to be Things in hiding.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Ozzu on January 31, 2009, 03:35:10 PM It could be much worse. At least it isn't a remake. It's pretty tough to top the best horror movie of all time with scrubs.
Still, I wish they would just leave this "franchise" alone. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Yegolev on January 31, 2009, 07:02:27 PM The world needs a good haunted house movie again. Keep saying that and we will get another House of Wax. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Jain Zar on February 01, 2009, 01:21:43 PM There is no way that this prequel film can live up to "The Thing". No way. It isn't needed to explain anything. Bad stuff happened at the Norwegian camp. That's it, end of story. I love how all these remakes are farmed out to McMovie directors and fucking scabs. Who in their right mind would even want to try and better The Thing, Halloween, or Texas Chainsaw Massacre? They're classics for a goddamned reason. Remakes and sequels are where you separate actual directors from hacks. Case in point: David Fincher and Alien 3. He didn't say, "Hey, I'm going to remake Aliens, but bigger and better!". He's smart enough to know that you're not going to out-action Cameron, so he goes a different route. You get some hack like Brett Ratner, though, and he'll reshoot Man Hunter with a higher budget and just call it Red Dragon. Not an ounce of shame that he's taking sloppy seconds from Michael Mann, because again, he's a scab hack who's just in it for the paycheck. The thing is, Alien 3 was a piece of shit. On its own its a passable movie with a bunch of bald guys who all look alike. As a sequel to my favorite movie of all time its a giant pile of ass that basically tells the audience of Aliens "HEY FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER!" by stomping over the whole fucking POINT of it. Though Fincher wasn't the guy responsible for Fight Club and Seven then. He was a music video director who Fox probably hoped wouldn't piss of Weaver and her giant fucking ego. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Big Gulp on February 01, 2009, 02:06:41 PM Though Fincher wasn't the guy responsible for Fight Club and Seven then. He was a music video director who Fox probably hoped wouldn't piss of Weaver and her giant fucking ego. He came in when another director flaked, and then the studio recut his version of the movie. What you're seeing isn't David Fincher's Alien 3 (and even with that said, it's still not bad), it's 20th Century Fox's. To this day we don't have a directors cut of Alien 3 because Fincher washed his hands of the whole thing. Fincher learned from that and never let another movie get taken out of his hands. For instance, the producers of Seven were adamant that that movie wouldn't end with a head in a box. Fincher was willing to walk away from the movie unless he got the version he wanted. And thankfully, now that he's tied to the hip with Brad Pitt he can basically do what he wants. Contrast that with Ratner, who essentially is just an errand boy for the studios. He'll come in, shoot quick, edit quick, and wrap it up under budget. The studios love him for it, but he produces shit. A guy like that is always going to get work because he doesn't cause problems for the studios and will happily be their little bitch. Of course, that doesn't produce art, but it's great at producing fast food movies and generating profit. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Tannhauser on February 01, 2009, 03:21:35 PM Big Trouble is my fave Carpenter movie. I mean come on!
But The Thing is one seriously fuckin' scary movie. And gross. It ranks up with Jaws for suspense and dread. PoD is a great film too, but not in the same league as the two above. Hmm gotta Netflix me some Carpenter movies... Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: apocrypha on February 01, 2009, 11:14:26 PM The thing is, Alien 3 was a piece of shit. On its own its a passable movie with a bunch of bald guys who all look alike. As a sequel to my favorite movie of all time its a giant pile of ass that basically tells the audience of Aliens "HEY FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER!" by stomping over the whole fucking POINT of it. Alien 3 is my favourite of the franchise. Aliens was a great film but it was an action flick, not a suspense survival film like Alien. I thought Alien 3 brought it back to the original and made the alien actually seem powerful and dangerous again. Plus, whole thing was an allegorical piece about the early treatment of AIDS sufferers imo. Totally agree that Aliens & Alien 3 appeal to different audiences, but I don't think that's a bad thing. You could make exactly the same criticism of Aliens with respect to fans of Alien. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on February 01, 2009, 11:40:38 PM Quote The thing is, Alien 3 was a piece of shit. On its own its a passable movie with a bunch of bald guys who all look alike. As a sequel to my favorite movie of all time its a giant pile of ass that basically tells the audience of Aliens "HEY FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER!" by stomping over the whole fucking POINT of it. This is exactly my view. Killing off two of the characters in the opening credits? If you don't want to do a sequel just say no. It reeks of the way new comic writers take over, immediately kill off the characters they don't like and resurrect old characters they do like. If you are continuing a series you have to show some basic respect for it, you can't just lazily jettison the parts that don't appeal to you. And yes, a bunch of pasty white dudes who all look alike was a terrible direction to go in, especially after the strong and diverse casts of both earlier movies. The camerawork was mostly crappy as well, all the Alien chase scenes were terrible. The original is vastly superior in every respect. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: DraconianOne on February 02, 2009, 02:49:20 AM Must be that time of year. I could have sworn we had exactly the same discussion about Aliens, Alien 3 & Alien Resurrection about this time last year just before AvP:R came out.
As for the Ron Moore doing a remake/whatever of "The Thing" - which part of this is news? Ron Moore announced he was working on this in June 2007 (http://www.collider.com/entertainment/interviews/article.asp/aid/4581/tcid/1) - so it was hardly a rumour and definitely not new news. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Ironwood on February 02, 2009, 03:04:17 AM Plus, whole thing was an allegorical piece about the early treatment of AIDS sufferers imo. What ? Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: apocrypha on February 02, 2009, 05:52:44 AM Plus, whole thing was an allegorical piece about the early treatment of AIDS sufferers imo. What ? Quote The big picture Alien3 by David Fincher Science fiction has always held a fascination for me. It has the potential to construct alternative worlds where you can create utopias, while actually talking about what concerns us today. The Alien trilogy framed a whole genre of science fiction film with its three very different narratives linked by the character of Ripley (played by Sigourney Weaver), a strong assertive female lead not prepared to submit to either the company or the Freudian monster that seeks to possess her. If the first film, Alien, introduces the idea of body horror, of the boundaries of the body under threat, the second, Aliens, is a Vietnam war film with high tech guns aiding marines on a rescue mission. The third Alien3, directed by David Fincher is fundamentally different and worth watching. Written by Vincent Ward, who made the excellent film The Navigator, the film sees Ripley crash landing on an isolated prison planet. From the beginning this instalment of the trilogy is very different from the others. The other two survivors from the previous film Hicks, a soldier, and Newt, a young girl turn out to be dead and so the neat nuclear family unit that is part of the right wing message of Aliens is shattered in the 1990s version. The bleak, desolate planet on which Ripley finds herself is populated by a colony of male prisoners beyond the pale of even other prison populations. Its talk of contagion, viruses and the iconography of the prisoners all point to what the film is about for me an allegory for Aids. What the film turns on is the growing realisation amongst these men that they have no choice but to fight for their very existence because, along with Ripley, who carries an alien foetus inside her, an alien has also landed on the planet. Some of the prisoners seek to blame Ripley for unwittingly bringing the monster with her but she is defended by the leader of the group who sees her as much a victim as the rest of them and unites with her to try and destroy it. Most effective in the film is the strength of resistance of Ripley and the prisoners who are fighting not just the monster but the corporation that wants it as a weapon. The parallel experience of gay men in America and Britain fighting not just a virus but state indifference and prejudice couldn't be clearer. In one scene they gather to decide on their course of action. The company lackey says they should wait for it to rescue them and not do anything that might rock the boat, but Ripley argues they should remember that in the eyes of the corporation they are all expendable. Dillon, the leader of the prisoners, continues in the same vein, `You're all gonna die. The only question is how you check out, on your feet or on your knees begging. I ain't much for begging. Nobody gave me nothing. So I say fuck that thing. Let's fight it.' This could be straight from the speech by Larry Kramer which launched Act Up (the militant gay activist group) in New York when he said, `If my speech tonight doesn't scare the shit out of you, we're in real trouble. If what you're hearing doesn't rouse you to anger, fury, rage and action, gay men have no future here on earth. How long does it take before you get angry and fight back?' Ripley soon realises that she is carrying an alien foetus inside her and this makes her a valuable commodity to the company. She refuses to let them control her body and rather than allow herself to be taken alive to breed the alien, she throws herself into the fire. Some people might view this as a negative ending, but I think it's like the ending to Thelma and Louise where rather than let the state take away the freedom they have come to discover they carry on driving. Alien3 isn't a cheery film but then the experience of the last 15 years of Aids hasn't been either. However, it has been one where a group of people marginalised and considered expendable have learnt to fight back and not accept the status quo. The `fuck you' that the remaining survivor exclaims at the end of the film to the company thugs isn't the clearest declaration of socialist thinking, but the spirit of resistance is where socialists start. John Lynch Now I think that review (from Socialist Review, 1996) takes it a step too far, and that that particular view is just one possible interpretation, or even just an indication of subconscious influences on Fincher, but I think the parallels are strong. I know I'm in a minority in liking Alien3, but there is more depth to the film than most people seem to think, and if it disappointed fans of the gung-ho action flick (of which there's no shortage in Hollywood) then so be it. There are so many cliches in mainstream films, so much predictability and safe, formulaic output, that personally I cherish any decent attempt to break some of those cliches and for me Alien 3 does that very well. Edit: On-topic! A prequal of The Thing that wasn't predictable, formulaic, cliche-ridden Hollywood tripe would be worth making. Magic 8-ball says "Unlikely". Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Ironwood on February 02, 2009, 07:01:46 AM "Away and raffle yer bunnet."
:oh_i_see: Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Engels on February 02, 2009, 09:15:34 AM I'm with apocrypha on this one. Aliens was a fun movie, but it was hardly nuanced. The two subsequent movies utterly fail at mass-market appeal , but of course cannot be taken seriously as art house movies, so they fall through the cracks. I'm not saying that in the future they will be called Classics of 20th century cinema or some such, but they did explore the core questions the original movie, Alien, brought up. I personally really liked the last movie, in particular for the art involved. Of course, they made the mistake of trying to put some action into the flick, and as many of us know, the French just aren't that hot on making action flicks, Femm Nikita aside.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: LK on February 02, 2009, 09:22:36 AM Seems the popular trend nowadays is to mine movie / TV IP from the 80's in the hope that they can reignite them (Terminator, Transformers, GI Joe, The Thing, etc.). I imagine around 2020 we'll start seeing movies that take advantage of quality 90's movies.
... Ok, probably just more sequels from extremely popular 80's flicks. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Merusk on February 02, 2009, 09:30:23 AM Seems the popular trend nowadays is to mine movie / TV IP from the 80's in the hope that they can reignite them (Terminator, Transformers, GI Joe, The Thing, etc.). I imagine around 2020 we'll start seeing movies that take advantage of quality 90's movies. ... Ok, probably just more sequels from extremely popular 80's flicks. It'll depend on what the 30 somethings then were into 10 years ago. Pokemon? Blue's Clues "behind the scenes" comedy? I don't know. In 2030 you can expect another Star Wars revisit and some Yu-Gi-Oh with another Batman revamp based on my nephews and son's tastes. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Nevermore on February 02, 2009, 10:02:01 AM I eagerly await the sequel to Independence Day, wherein the evil alien overlord Llib Setag finally patches that security flaw in their flying saucer OS and recommences the attack on Earth.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: stu on February 02, 2009, 10:02:15 AM As for the Ron Moore doing a remake/whatever of "The Thing" - which part of this is news? Ron Moore announced he was working on this in June 2007 (http://www.collider.com/entertainment/interviews/article.asp/aid/4581/tcid/1) - so it was hardly a rumour and definitely not new news. lrn2read. The first sentence of that article I linked says "this isn't necessarily new news." The point is, there's actually some movement on it. Sometimes you're alright, but for the most part you're a jerkoff. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: DraconianOne on February 02, 2009, 11:54:25 AM Sometimes you're alright, but for the most part you're a jerkoff. That's exactly what my wife says to me. It must be true. Now I think that review (from Socialist Review, 1996) takes it a step too far, and that that particular view is just one possible interpretation, or even just an indication of subconscious influences on Fincher, but I think the parallels are strong. That interpretation has got to be one of the worst I've ever read about Alien3 but then it is from the Socialist Review and so he does have an agenda which no doubt involves ignoring anything to do with religion including the very explicit themes of faith, punishment, redemption and sacrifice. Also, don't blame Fincher - he just helmed it. Look to Walter Hill and David Giler who wrote the screenplay for it. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: SnakeCharmer on February 02, 2009, 12:00:06 PM That..um...interpretation of Aliens3 was almost as an entertaining read as the premise that Firefly/Serenity was an entire series and movie was nothing but a sexist slam against women or something equally retarded.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Jain Zar on February 02, 2009, 02:18:42 PM That review is pure shit. An ad hoc potential family is clearly RIGHT WING?
Seriously? Really? And I have been bitter about Alien 3 since it came out, and seeing Weaver's comments in the Alien Quadrilogy set just set the angry on overdrive. Fucking egotistical CUNT. Even worse considering the Mark Verheiden Aliens Dark Horse comic trilogy was so fucking superior to the 2 Alien movies we got after Aliens its not even funny. (Of course Weaver wouldn't want THAT. It made the stories about Newt and not RIPLEY ALL THE TIME. ) As far as I am concerned 3 and Resurrection are alternate timeline movies from a more horrible, sucky universe where mediocre, silly movies come from. Yet its funny I don't have the bile for AvP 1 and 2 everyone else seems to. I don't expect high intelligence from them, and its got Aliens and Predators killing people and each other so pass the nachos and beer. (Though again, Dark Horse did it better. Hawt Japanese corporate type learns to unbitch herself and help save cattle rancher space colonists at the same time. And becomes such a bad ass she actually gets adopted by a Predator hunting pack! ) Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: WindupAtheist on February 02, 2009, 02:28:49 PM Alien 3 was shit. If you like it, fuck you.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Tannhauser on February 02, 2009, 03:25:10 PM No fucking way Aliens 3 is a good movie.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Merusk on February 02, 2009, 03:49:34 PM You should have known Newt was gonna be dead when they announced A3. She's not an integral part of the story, and the girl was 14 by then. Get over it already. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: sidereal on February 02, 2009, 04:14:21 PM IS THAT ALL YOU GOT?!
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: DraconianOne on February 02, 2009, 05:06:55 PM You should have known Newt was gonna be dead when they announced A3. She's not an integral part of the story, and the girl was 14 by then. Get over it already. :awesome_for_real: Frankly, Newt should never haved survived Aliens. But's that my own problem and I'm dealing with it my own way, thank you very much. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on February 02, 2009, 08:37:51 PM Quote Hicks, a soldier, and Newt, a young girl turn out to be dead and so the neat nuclear family unit that is part of the right wing message of Aliens is shattered in the 1990s version. Really? A movie where macho military clowns are beat down by savages, where the military-industrial complex kills of an entire colony of people in order to cultivate a biological super-weapon and where the main human badguy is a slick corporate schill has a right wing message? Not seeing it. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: apocrypha on February 02, 2009, 11:52:41 PM Now I think that review (from Socialist Review, 1996) takes it a step too far I gave the source of that review for a reason guys, try not to froth too much :why_so_serious: Alien 3 was shit. If you like it, fuck you. Yeah cos the world would be awesome if we all had identical tastes wouldn't it? :roll: Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Ironwood on February 03, 2009, 01:15:42 AM Yes.
It would be interesting, at least, to watch all you assholes try to fuck my wife. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Riggswolfe on February 03, 2009, 12:21:22 PM To go back to an earlier derail:
I got PoD on DVD after our earlier discussion. I'd forgotten how fucking creepy that movie is. Creepy dream images from the future? Yeah, fuck that. Oh, and the ending? Haunting. Very haunting. Oh, and how did I forget that the blond brother from Simon and Simon is in that movie? Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: HaemishM on February 03, 2009, 12:38:10 PM Oh, and how did I forget that the blond brother from Simon and Simon is in that movie? It was that rocking pr0n moustache he was sporting. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Soln on February 03, 2009, 02:33:07 PM I am not horror fan, but this was impressive.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: UnSub on February 04, 2009, 04:21:08 AM Yes. It would be interesting, at least, to watch all you assholes try to fuck my wife. All at once, or would there be a line? Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Oban on February 04, 2009, 03:28:23 PM Wow, not touching that comment with a ten foot pole.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: sidereal on February 04, 2009, 03:29:46 PM I'm not going to touch a comment about that comment that involves the word 'pole'.
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: UnSub on February 04, 2009, 03:53:06 PM Wow, not touching that comment with a ten foot pole. Hey, he said he wanted to watch. :grin: Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: chargerrich on February 10, 2009, 09:49:40 AM Quite possibly the best horror movie ever... How did the same person that made this masterpiece make Ghosts of Mars? :ye_gods:
Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: DraconianOne on February 10, 2009, 11:24:41 AM Quite possibly the best horror movie ever... How did the same person that made this masterpiece make Ghosts of Mars? :ye_gods: Ghosts of Mars is Citizen Kane compared to his remake of Village of the Damned. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: apocrypha on February 10, 2009, 01:24:54 PM Wow, not touching that comment with a ten foot pole. Hey, he said he wanted to watch. :grin: That reminds me, I need to watch Being There again. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: UnSub on February 11, 2009, 08:17:39 PM Quite possibly the best horror movie ever... How did the same person that made this masterpiece make Ghosts of Mars? :ye_gods: Ghosts of Mars is Citizen Kane compared to his remake of Village of the Damned. "Vampires" was also awful. Just awful. Title: Re: John Carpenter's The Thing Post by: Margalis on February 11, 2009, 11:10:05 PM Naw, Vampires was fine. Not great but not bad. The female actress did annoy but I liked the overall plotline, the other acting and the general vibe.
Village of the Damned was truly awful. At least movies like Ghosts of Mars and Vampires are fun, Village of the Damned was just deadly dull. |