f13.net

http://woodgears.ca/eyeball/index.html

I got a 6.26 overall, which is bleh.  I did get a few individual 0.0's though.  Gonna try again.

Edit:
3.89 Overall the second time.

Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at woodgears.ca.

Link works for me in Firefox.

Doesn't work for me either.

(http://www.clisham.com-a.googlepages.com/Picture5.png)

http://woodgears.ca/eyeball/

That work?  Google "The Eyeballing Game".

Works for me. I got an 8.88 at first, but I mislicked three times (!!) for a couple of 65s and a 30something  :oh_i_see:

Overall score: 5.79 on first try

5.88

3.8

11.89

Decidedly mediocre.

Average error:   8.19   (lower is better)

I have to admit, i got some wrong due to not understanding the mathematical terms used in the questions. Math, or anything related i fail, hard, at.

8.13

I finally got it working and I fuxx0red the triangle ones, now that I've looked it up I'm gonna do it again.

4.20

5.20. Still fuxx0red the triangles one. Maybe I'm just not getting it. I had 6 zeroes. Also, another test I wish was timed.

3.44. The equidistant inside the triangle was the hardest.

4.81, and that was without taking more than a few seconds on each one.  Much better than that color-matching thing.

I can never get close with that one either.

3.28 on my first attempt...where you supposed to do it for all three columns (I did)?

Edit:  dang, just saw all your scores...I must be unusually good at this sort of thing.  The only one I had even slight trouble was the parallelogram, and that was like a 6.5 average.

5.21

My first few were really off.  Then I remembered some of my trig and did better.  The parallelogram and midpoint were my downfall.

4.58

Dead on for bisecting angles 0.0, 0.1, 0.7

Brutal on triangle centre: 12.5, 5.0, 4.4

Got a 6.71. Can I blame my monitor for this one too? :grin:

I've been getting high 4s and low 5s. I tend to get bored with it during the third round and my score tanks.

I never had trig :)

3.22 on the second try.  I didn't get what they meant with the 'center of triangle' on the first pass.

OK, now I feel like shit. As far as this place goes, I'm not mediocre at all. Just a retard.

I fucked it up at first too... I'm sure that I can at least get under 10 on a second try.  :oh_i_see:

Tried a few more times and can't get out of 3.4-3.6 range. Keep messing up the parallelograms :|

5.64 first time.

Edit:  4.8 2nd time.  realized convergence was screwing me after first time.

Okay, so now I've tried this about four times, all scores between about 3.2 and 3.4

So what is really testing? 

Err I misread midpoind of sides as midpoint of angles and got a 60, so my average was ruined. Then I got bored when I found I had to do everything thrice. Why do all these tests make you do things over and over.

Was pleased I got a 0.0 though!

Your lemming potential.

3.96 first time. A nine something on bisecting the angle blew a great score.

3.99

I was bored and did this again, got 2.6.

Tempted to try for the high score now... mmm boredom.

Centre circle, bisect and parallelogram are letting me down. Right angle, convergance and midpoint are easy easy.

If you look quick I'm in the top 500. 2.21. Rather annoyed because I was sitting on 1.5 before a couple of 3.6s and a 7.  :uhrr:

Weird. First column, I got 1.08, with my worst score being a 3.0 and my best a 0. Second column, I start going way the hell off. :( Then I recover a bit towards the end.

Am #10 in the last 500 right now, with a score of 2.87, for the next few minutes I suppose.

8.04


Been up and out all day. Also, Phillies World Series game, so I think I did pretty well.

Also, are you guys just eyeballing it, or doing actual measurements and stuff? I've gotten close to 0, but no actual zero.

4.7

I'm happy, considering I was layin down and I can't friggin sleep.

I need to see an optometrist.

Was eyeballing it. I assume if you cheat you could get very close to zero often.

Convergance, right angle, bisect, and midpoint you should be able to get close to 0.0 pretty often if you have good eyesight. The others are tougher because you have to consider several measurements at once.

I was eyeballing it. No extraneous tools.

My eyesight is fine....20/17 and 20/20.

I guess I was just doing it wrong. Or my monitor sucks? I dunno.

Be sure you are running your LCD monitor at native res. Otherwise, everything will be distorted anyhow.

LCD?

Hehe, try cheaper 4 year old CRT.  :oh_i_see:

Curved screen?

Brain damage? :awesome_for_real:

No, it's flat.I think I did it wrong to begin with....

I hated trig/geometry anyway.

EDIT: Got it down to 5.33 on a second try. I think I wing it too much.

Um, you're supposed to "wing it" I think.  That's the point.

to establish variation and consistency.


has nothing to do with this type of test.  Its a test of judgement moreso then quality of occular vision.

Bad astigmatism could affect it I reckon, but only if it was uncorrected.

I should get completely intoxicated and then give this a shot.

No way?  :why_so_serious:

Well I had a pint of whiskey tonight and got a 3.81 so far. Will try a fifth tomorrow and see if I get better.

Heh. I like this guy.

Third go got me 2.82. Second parallelogram gave me 12.4 other wise might have been half decent.

I formed a trapezoid instead of a parallelogram on the first question.  :awesome_for_real: