f13.net

f13.net General Forums => Serious Business => Topic started by: Lakov_Sanite on February 21, 2008, 09:39:47 AM



Title: American Idol.
Post by: Lakov_Sanite on February 21, 2008, 09:39:47 AM
Yes, American Idol. I know it's useless, I know it's complete and utter tripe but I also know I'm not the only one here who watches with some sort of morbid curiousity. Shall we discuss?



Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 21, 2008, 09:40:41 AM
You go first.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Lakov_Sanite on February 21, 2008, 09:45:25 AM
What, besides my utter crush on Brooke?  Well I think this year has some really strong talent, I'm not really the kind to predict winners but I'm leaning towards the men this year. Besides a few stand-outs most of the girls are pretty cookie cutter and bland.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 21, 2008, 10:38:20 AM
They just about all suck.  I predict the winner will be either an Australian or a girl who is mostly crap but poppy and cute enough for Simon to sell for a year and then dump.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 10:56:19 AM
No Melinda.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 21, 2008, 11:10:11 AM
I don't know what that means.   :?


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Cadaverine on February 21, 2008, 11:18:08 AM
No means no.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 11:28:58 AM
(http://www.cinemablend.com/images/sections/4266/4266.jpg)
No Melinda-style great singer. Some decent talent, but we're probably done watching now that the silly preliminaries are over.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: WayAbvPar on February 21, 2008, 11:29:50 AM
Never watched it, never will. There isn't a Hell hot enough for the producers of 95% of reality TV.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 11:53:46 AM
Eh, I don't mind some of it. Idol can be ok when it's rough but talented singers coming into their own. It's fun to watch the process, knowing they are starting their careers totally owned by Cowell...

Rockstar was a much better series, I hope they do another one. Having song interpretations and much more interaction with the band was cool. Also, Dilana.




Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Nebu on February 21, 2008, 12:39:39 PM
I'll stick with Top Chef for my reality fix.  The whole Idol thing got old fast, especially after the Rick Astley clone came in second a couple years ago.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 21, 2008, 12:41:58 PM
Oh, right.  I remember her.  I'm so bad with names.  She was good but she was already a professional singer.  She was a ringer.  Totally shouldn't have even been in the competition.  I'm sure they pepper their shows with them.  I'm not crazy about professional athletes being in the Olympics, either, although I watch and enjoy some of the sports.  I don't mind when I forget to watch American Idol.  It's a terrible show.  I thought Rockstar and that INXS one was pretty awful, too.  When I watch television, I have a tendency to watch incredibly bad stuff.   :uhrr: 

(I watch Survivor and Big Brother, too.  Poor Righ.  And I  :heart: :heart: :heart: Top Chef and anything with Gordon Ramsey)


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Nebu on February 21, 2008, 12:51:10 PM
And I  :heart: :heart: :heart: Top Chef and anything with Gordon Ramsey)

Kitchen Nightmares on BBC is one of my favorites! 


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Sky on February 21, 2008, 01:07:10 PM
She was good but she was already a professional singer.  She was a ringer.  Totally shouldn't have even been in the competition.
Professional backup singer. Big difference. I was actually rooting for her to lose, so she wouldn't get stuck with a Cowell contract. Good way to get a lot of national face-time and get your voice out there for people to see.

Gordon Ramsey is fun. I can tell when the fiancee is watching him when I'm in the kitchen and all I hear out of the living room is BEEP BEEP BEEP.

You think YOU watch bad stuff, Sig? I'm the king of bad tv, but it's got to be the right bad tv. Entertainingly bad. Last weekend we were watching the jewelry home shopping channel for about an hour because it was pretty hilarious. Those people are nuts. And that's without smoking weed. I'd watch the dumbest shit and laugh my ass off when I was a smoker.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Righ on February 21, 2008, 01:21:49 PM
This is the show where every week contestants are required to sing pre-arranged cover versions of famous songs and then force to listen to three people tell them that they have to "be original" and "stay true to themselves".

Here's the drama for this year, KKKirsty Lee:

(http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/2936/screencapbritneyhoevy0.jpg)

Courtesy of Vote for the Worst:

http://www.votefortheworst.com/forum/topic4079.html


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Lakov_Sanite on February 21, 2008, 01:41:58 PM
yee-haw them theres a sweet southern gurl
/end good old boy

I should be clear, this show is a total train wreck I just...I don't know, I'm compelled to watch. I think mostly I enjoy watching them butcher good songs or go up and sing horribly inappropriate ones for a pop-ish competition "moon river?!"  things like that.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: cmlancas on February 21, 2008, 01:48:02 PM
Wasn't there one that a guy sang to his mother? I think it was a Marvin Gaye song or something.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 21, 2008, 04:24:51 PM
The Australian bloke sang "Bohemian Rhapsody".  That's sort of a song to your mother.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: cmlancas on February 21, 2008, 04:28:30 PM
Nah, this one was like, "Let's make love, mommy," instead of, I can sing!


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: HaemishM on February 22, 2008, 09:54:43 AM
The only interesting parts of American Idol are when Cowell is raping the idiots who think they can sing but can't. Once they get serious, it's boring as fuck. The songs are really shitty muzak versions of already shitty songs, and the winners are barely heard from again.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Grand Design on February 22, 2008, 10:55:20 AM
I watch Idol with the same morbid curiosity with which I pick my nose.

Sometimes there are some real winners, but most of the time I just stare and ask, "where did that come from?"



I've had my eye on the Irish gal since she nailed "How Do I Get You Alone?"


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 22, 2008, 12:20:31 PM
Yes.  The Irish girl and the Australian guy are definitely the best of American Idol this year.  (http://www.invision.smileyville.net/smilies/doh%20(15).gif)


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Lakov_Sanite on February 22, 2008, 12:45:22 PM
Yes.  The Irish girl and the Australian guy are definitely the best of American Idol this year.  (http://www.invision.smileyville.net/smilies/doh%20(15).gif)

 :oh_i_see: ^

I can see them both playing up the whole "American Dream" angle though. You know, wanting to be a citizen, making it big. With all the worry about illegal immigration these days I can see this going over well, also she's incredibly cute on tv but she does not photo well at ALL.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Grand Design on February 22, 2008, 12:57:03 PM
I like the idea of a couple of foreigners stealing the show. 

It would be like me getting a ticket to Dublin on Irish Idol because I survived the mass imbibement semi-finals.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: stray on February 22, 2008, 01:16:41 PM
I don't know about Australians, but I suspect that EVERY Irish person can sing well.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Righ on February 22, 2008, 04:02:47 PM
That is incorrect. Even many of the ones that can, shouldn't.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Obo on February 22, 2008, 04:10:46 PM
Of course we can. Sure weren't we winning Eurovision year after year.  :drill:


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Margalis on February 22, 2008, 10:13:34 PM
The thing that annoys me about Idol is how the singers and the audience all pretend to be into shit like Aretha Franklin and Marvin Gaye when you know that they're really into Maroon 5.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Grand Design on February 23, 2008, 06:15:43 AM
Its not that they are pretending to like good music, its that the producers know we wouldn't tune in if the song selection was Fallout Boy and Maroon 5.  I get the impression that the ones with real talent are familiar with the older stuff (Melinda Doolittle), while the others who only want to giggle in front of the camera have to listen to the oldies station with their dad in the car before an audition.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Selby on February 23, 2008, 08:47:55 AM
I'd rather them sing Maroon 5 and Fallout Boy than G-Unit or Ludacris...


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Margalis on February 24, 2008, 01:50:06 PM
Its not that they are pretending to like good music, its that the producers know we wouldn't tune in if the song selection was Fallout Boy and Maroon 5. 

Is that actually true? I bet an Idol show that covered what the audience actually listens to would do quite well.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Righ on February 24, 2008, 02:38:47 PM
Possibly, but its unlikely to happen, especially at an individual level. The main reason that the contestants are required to sing certain songs is that there is a limited amount of time for the singers to practice with the band, so they tend to have a selection of songs to choose from. They also tend to use songs penned by professional songwriters - I'm sure that it makes life simpler for the production company, but its also a case of the mainstream music industry patting itself on the back wherever possible.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Trippy on February 24, 2008, 06:46:52 PM
Actually they are pretty flexible on AI. Last year Blake Lewis sung all sorts of obscure (to me) songs. There are issues with getting the rights to be able to perform the songs and all that but unless it's a particular artist's theme night (like say an Elton John night) the singers have a lot of latitude to choose.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Righ on February 24, 2008, 09:20:59 PM
They weren't especially obscure (http://top40.about.com/od/blakelewis/Blake_Lewis.htm) (and I think all were Sony BMG or Universal). Though one was a Maroon 5 song. :-P


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: stray on February 24, 2008, 10:14:36 PM
C'mon, who doesn't like Aretha and Marvin Gaye? I mean, I'm sure most of these contestants are dumb and young, but those are two names that universally known and loved. I'm willing to give Idol contestants that credit at least.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 25, 2008, 06:43:12 AM
I'm not crazy about Aretha Franklin and Marvin Gaye.  And I don't much care for Johnny Cash, either.  Don't kill me.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Sky on February 25, 2008, 06:48:13 AM
I was thinking Blake should join Maroon 5. He did their material quite well, and it actually turned me onto the band, they're pretty good for pop stuff.

Also, Signe is a zombie.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 25, 2008, 06:52:32 AM
FUCKU!!!!


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Nebu on February 25, 2008, 07:05:51 AM
I think Aretha is one of those artists that is better appreciated with a context.  Johnny Cash is a love/hate thing.  I think people either really love the guy or they don't. 


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Grand Design on February 25, 2008, 07:10:52 AM
Yeah, but Marvin Gaye?  I thought everyone loved him.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Bunk on February 25, 2008, 07:24:32 AM
I'd have forgiven you if you stopped before hating on Johnny. I woke up to "Hurt" this morning on my alarm clock. Seemed a really appropriate way to start a Monday.

Oh, and I admit to being a bit of a reality tv junkie.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Signe on February 25, 2008, 08:08:35 AM
I didn't say I hated him.  I don't even hate the other two.  I'm just not a fan.  OR A ZOMBIE!


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: HaemishM on February 25, 2008, 09:02:49 AM
C'mon, who doesn't like Aretha and Marvin Gaye? I mean, I'm sure most of these contestants are dumb and young, but those are two names that universally known and loved. I'm willing to give Idol contestants that credit at least.

I love Aretha and Marvin Gaye. I don't love barely-talented, pretty-faced assclowns butchering a muzak version of those two artists' great works.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: cmlancas on February 26, 2008, 06:09:23 PM
Oh. Just so you all know:


David Archuleta. Good luck anyone else winning. This guy sounds like a combination of Richard Marx and Josh Groban to me. Completely relevant and actually pretty damn good.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Righ on February 26, 2008, 06:49:11 PM
David Archuleta... Completely relevant

Quote
Musical Influences: Natalie Cole, Stevie Wonder, Kirk Franklin, Bryan Adams.

So not completely relevant then. :)


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: cmlancas on February 26, 2008, 07:17:36 PM
Did you hear him? He's good. Like, nobody else on the guys' side should be singing with him good.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Righ on February 26, 2008, 08:38:10 PM
Most of the people on the guys side shouldn't be there, that's for sure. The judges have to keep repeating that this is the best season ever in the hopes that somebody will believe them. He is good, though I do prefer the Aussie ringer.


Title: Re: American Idol.
Post by: Trippy on February 27, 2008, 02:16:05 AM
David Archuleta. Good luck anyone else winning. This guy sounds like a combination of Richard Marx and Josh Groban to me. Completely relevant and actually pretty damn good.
He's trying way too hard to change up his songs. Just sing the fucking melody. You don't need to tack on two or three extra syllables to every word. He's the Anwar Robinson of this season.