|
Title: Well dang Post by: Baldrake on February 20, 2008, 11:21:12 AM Teh interweb isn't as dangerous as we all thought (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080220.wpredator20/BNStory/Technology/home).
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: JWIV on February 20, 2008, 12:22:16 PM Teh interweb isn't as dangerous as we all thought (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080220.wpredator20/BNStory/Technology/home). Bullshit liberal pedo media! CSI and SVU tells me otherwise! Nothing but serial killers and pedo's on the internet! Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Murgos on February 20, 2008, 12:38:43 PM Meh, the child porn scare tactics are just an excuse to pass legislation that benefits a privileged few at the expense of the majority, not because it saves any children. I highly doubt that there has been any statistical difference in the number of statutory rape cases before the advent of the internet and now.
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Samwise on February 21, 2008, 08:25:28 AM Quote none of the victims were under 12 years of age (http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8126/bearnotimpressedsz2.png) Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Nerf on February 21, 2008, 01:52:56 PM Everyone knows there are no 12 year olds on the internet anyways, only perverts, FBI agents, and perverts working for Dateline.
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Sky on February 22, 2008, 06:32:37 AM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: bhodi on February 22, 2008, 06:38:32 AM I prefer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment_%28film%29
mmmmmmmmmmmm. I would hit it like the fist of an angry god. I'd hit it so hard whoever could pull me out would become king of england. And so on.... Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Margalis on February 22, 2008, 10:10:46 PM That movie was absolutely awful and she is not hot.
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Signe on February 23, 2008, 06:56:40 AM Who are we talking about? Catherine Zeta-Jones? At least that's the woman listed on the film in the wiki... or someone else? Sorry. I'm confused again. If it IS her and by "she is not hot", you mean "she is not pretty", then I think you're nuts. She's absolutely lovely, regardless of her acting... which seems ok in the few things I've seen.
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Selby on February 23, 2008, 08:46:09 AM That movie was absolutely awful... Wow. Someone else agreed with me! I was ostracized from my group of friends for dare speaking out about ZJDouglas' butt being featured so prominently in the previews and then delivering us such a sub-par film product.Title: Re: Well dang Post by: HaemishM on February 25, 2008, 09:00:20 AM I enjoyed Entrapment, but yes, it was a really shitty movie.
However, saying Catherine Zeta-Jones is not hot is just :ye_gods: crazy-Dash territory. Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Teleku on February 25, 2008, 01:29:48 PM Sorry Margalis, but you need to hand in your Man Badge. You can get it back once you've redeemed yourself.
Title: Re: Well dang Post by: Llava on February 26, 2008, 02:41:25 AM You know, if we didn't make pedophilia such a taboo, the pedophiles could have already told us all this and saved us, I'm sure, a decent chunk of taxpayer money.
Sort of makes you think about who the real monsters are. (It's still the pedophiles.) |