Title: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: pants on February 08, 2008, 02:23:08 AM http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/wowmini/en/
Oh, this is just pure joy. A WoW tabletop miniatures game. Fan-bloody-tastic :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: cmlancas on February 08, 2008, 03:42:31 AM Can I AFK camp AV for phat lewt? :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Simond on February 08, 2008, 03:55:58 AM If Blizzard really wants to mess with GW, all they have to do is price their miniatures about 10% below the WARHAMS going rate.
Next up - Starcraft tabletop with Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: cmlancas on February 08, 2008, 03:57:02 AM I like that the first three posts all end in :awesome_for_real:.
Well, four now. :awesome_for_real: Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Dtrain on February 08, 2008, 04:11:03 AM No wai! This has nothing to do with Warhammer - Blizzard has the most original ideas ever. :awesome_for_real:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Trippy on February 08, 2008, 05:32:26 AM Not the same market :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Draegan on February 08, 2008, 06:02:47 AM Can I solo any of the campaigns? :uhrr:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Signe on February 08, 2008, 06:10:12 AM Can I solo any of the campaigns? :uhrr: Err... isn't that just playing with your dollies? Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Nevermore on February 08, 2008, 06:20:40 AM Action figures!
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: schild on February 08, 2008, 06:26:49 AM I want to cover my desk in peons and have BS player on auto-repeat with an MP3 that just repeats "oooooh k, yes boss, i'll get right on that."
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: tmp on February 08, 2008, 06:35:37 AM Thought they had that one out already.
(http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/comics/20050207.jpg) Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 08, 2008, 06:44:42 AM lol, i own the board game...and that rules not in there, lol. But its funny.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: IainC on February 08, 2008, 06:58:23 AM Reading the FAQ, it sounds more like Heroclix than Warhammer.
Prepainted minis, 1-5 characters per side etc. Interestingly though the figures are designed and 'paint detailed' by Mike McVey (http://www.studiomcvey.com/). Those of you as beardy as I am will remember him as GW's painting wunderkind who went on to be a sculptor before leaving GW at around the same time that I did. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: tasmia on February 08, 2008, 06:58:50 AM Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Johny Cee on February 08, 2008, 07:09:39 AM SsssssSssssssSssssssSSSSSSssssss Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 08, 2008, 07:11:22 AM Yes, i know. The grammar snake and spelling skunk are at constant odds with me. Thanks for bringing it up. :cry2:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Yegolev on February 08, 2008, 07:37:18 AM I must report that the Grammar Snake has just resigned in disgust. We are actively seeking a replacement snake.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 08, 2008, 07:40:06 AM I'm sorry.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Ratman_tf on February 08, 2008, 07:44:34 AM According to the main WoW page, there will be rules to raid with the miniatures.
... :ye_gods: I'll probably get some so my Decepticons have some gnomes to step on. :grin: Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: tmp on February 08, 2008, 07:52:35 AM According to the main WoW page, there will be rules to raid with the miniatures. Hopefully they remembered to put option for Master Looter in, just imagine all the ninja drama otherwise.... :ye_gods: Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: schild on February 08, 2008, 08:17:28 AM How about a grammar & spelling monkey. I think I posted one in another thread.
He seems like a double threat. And he works for bananas. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: lesion on February 08, 2008, 08:34:07 AM Grammar midwife: it's a contraction!
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Typhon on February 08, 2008, 09:29:20 AM Does the G&S monkey fling poo? If so, I vote yes!
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: ajax34i on February 08, 2008, 09:54:00 AM As long as all the figurines can fit in one square (hex?), like they do in-game when people raid some of the boss encounters.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: sidereal on February 08, 2008, 12:24:03 PM Next up - Starcraft tabletop with If it's small-scale (meaning individual rather than squad activation, a la Mordheim) and the minis cost less than a testicle and a half each (a la GW) I will setup a separate checking account to pay for an army right now. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Trippy on February 08, 2008, 02:12:46 PM Reading the FAQ, it sounds more like Heroclix than Warhammer. Exactly.Prepainted minis, 1-5 characters per side etc. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: K9 on February 08, 2008, 02:25:13 PM Interestingly though the figures are designed and 'paint detailed' by Mike McVey (http://www.studiomcvey.com/). Those of you as beardy as I am will remember him as GW's painting wunderkind who went on to be a sculptor before leaving GW at around the same time that I did. Even to this day I am compelled to stop in front of GW stores and oogle the miniatures on display, before remembering that I also need money to eat, and that my attempts to paint the minatures were :ye_gods: Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: WayAbvPar on February 08, 2008, 02:59:12 PM Action figures! I have always preferred inaction figures. (http://www.jpbenterprise.com/Pictures/D0086-ClerksBobIAFB.jpg) Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Tannhauser on February 08, 2008, 03:38:21 PM GODDAMIT BLIZZARD, JUST TAKE ALL MY DAMN MONEY AND TIME! I DON'T NEED TO EAT OR OR HAVE A LIFE!
hehe I shouted on teh intarwebs Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Calantus on February 08, 2008, 06:19:42 PM I'm not sure this is a good idea. I think anybody who's going to buy this is probably already broke from the card game.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: stu on February 08, 2008, 06:38:25 PM That's why God made credit cards. :ye_gods:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Johny Cee on February 08, 2008, 07:45:11 PM How about a grammar & spelling monkey. I think I posted one in another thread. He seems like a double threat. And he works for bananas. This is another step in the insidious monkey plot to assume control of the site! Edit: (http://services.tucows.com/developers/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/language_war_monkey_knife_fight.jpg) Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Modern Angel on February 08, 2008, 08:00:10 PM So odds on a GW lawsuit after all these years since Blizz just jumped in the toy soldier pool?
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Soukyan on February 08, 2008, 08:27:31 PM 2 thread for the price of 1. Combined with that necro-post, this has been quite the day for readers everywhere.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Azazel on February 09, 2008, 04:35:14 PM So odds on a GW lawsuit after all these years since Blizz just jumped in the toy soldier pool? Too late. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Modern Angel on February 10, 2008, 05:40:15 AM I've never found any concrete information that GW actually ever sued Blizzard for IP infringement. A lot of people on the intertubes SAY that GW did it but there doesn't seem to be one whit of proof.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Kirth on February 10, 2008, 07:23:01 AM I've never found any concrete information that GW actually ever sued Blizzard for IP infringement. A lot of people on the intertubes SAY that GW did it but there doesn't seem to be one whit of proof. I think the popular rumor is Blizz developed on their own, or on part of GW, warcraft and were then turned down, or GW backed out, and they renamed stuff and released it. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Modern Angel on February 10, 2008, 09:24:38 AM Right, which I've heard as well. But there's never, to my knowledge, been a lawsuit. It probably won't happen. I'm just tossing out that on the slim chance it did I wouldn't be surprised. Company with their back against the wall financially pulls the trigger when something 90% like their stuff visually comes out and invades their core business? Just saying...
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: IainC on February 10, 2008, 10:01:35 AM To my knowledge there never was a lawsuit, nor any suggestion of one.
As to the popular rumour that Warcraft was originally intended to be a Warhammer RTS and that Blizz had to remove GW's IP at the last minute, I really don't know. It is a persistent rumour and I remember asking Andy Jones about it years ago (AJ was the licencing manager for GW), I didn't get a conclusive answer though. Unless some old time Blizzard devs want to come out of the woodwork, I doubt it will ever be proven one way or the other. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Ratman_tf on February 10, 2008, 12:25:02 PM I can't believe no one's posted this yet.
(http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2006/20060410.jpg) Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Kirth on February 10, 2008, 12:33:40 PM I can't believe no one's posted this yet. (http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2006/20060410.jpg) One of my Favs. I want to get the t-shirt with it on it. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: DeathInABottle on February 10, 2008, 01:51:51 PM Anyone else think those things are hideously ugly?
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Righ on February 10, 2008, 03:16:05 PM The cartoons? I do, yes.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Teleku on February 10, 2008, 05:24:22 PM Err, what?
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Surlyboi on February 10, 2008, 07:46:06 PM And now WoWtards will play with miniatures and think Blizzard invented them too. :oh_i_see:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Aez on February 10, 2008, 08:01:06 PM They didn't?
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Chenghiz on February 10, 2008, 11:44:49 PM It's been said before but these won't hit the same market at all. Prepainted preassembled minis for a small scale battle just aren't in the same league as unpainted multipart models for large-scale battles, and this won't affect GW any more than heroclix or battletech or DnD minis did. Also, the overall miniature quality is pretty unimpressive.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: schild on February 10, 2008, 11:50:17 PM Saying these are unimpressive and liking the graphics in WoW is a pretty lol situation to me. These look like 1:1 copies of the WoW models. Which is to say, even polygon (or lack thereof) is accounted for.
Just shows you how lowtech that shit is when it's put into a tangible form. In fact, having looked at them again, the models look better than their in-game counterparts. Unfortunately, still completely ugly. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Modern Angel on February 11, 2008, 03:58:26 AM It's been said before but these won't hit the same market at all. Prepainted preassembled minis for a small scale battle just aren't in the same league as unpainted multipart models for large-scale battles, and this won't affect GW any more than heroclix or battletech or DnD minis did. Also, the overall miniature quality is pretty unimpressive. Except that those things were and are competition? I know people firsthand who simply didn't have time to paint miniatures anymore so got their toys on a chessboard fix with the games you just mentioned. Hell, go to any GW focused messageboard and the great hope AND fear (depending on who you ask) is that GW makes a move to pre-painted Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Surlyboi on February 11, 2008, 04:16:56 AM Hell, I'm still kinda pissed they went to plastic models. :angryfist:
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Typhon on February 11, 2008, 04:23:12 AM I would think that GW would be happy about this - there's going to be some part of those 10 million WoW subscribers that get introduced to minature battles via WoW minatures. Seems like GW could use a few new customers.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: tmp on February 11, 2008, 04:51:17 AM I would think that GW would be happy about this - there's going to be some part of those 10 million WoW subscribers that get introduced to minature battles via WoW minatures. Seems like GW could use a few new customers. Not sure if there's much to be happy about for them... i.e. how many MMOs got new subscribers out of 10 mil. WoW players, large part of which got introduced to MMOs via said WoW?Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Modern Angel on February 11, 2008, 04:53:06 AM Or how many people gave up miniatures and tabletop for the instant gratification of MMOs. I don't think it's a coincidence that GW's stock dropped and tabletop games across the board had sales drops at the same time that MMOs became the Big Entertainment Thing.
Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Ratman_tf on February 11, 2008, 08:20:31 AM Hell, I'm still kinda pissed they went to plastic models. :angryfist: Fuck that. Plastic is easier to assemble and mod. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Mrbloodworth on February 11, 2008, 09:00:20 AM To my knowledge there never was a lawsuit, nor any suggestion of one. As to the popular rumour that Warcraft was originally intended to be a Warhammer RTS and that Blizz had to remove GW's IP at the last minute, I really don't know. It is a persistent rumour and I remember asking Andy Jones about it years ago (AJ was the licencing manager for GW), I didn't get a conclusive answer though. Unless some old time Blizzard devs want to come out of the woodwork, I doubt it will ever be proven one way or the other. True. But its rather easy to make the connection just by looking at the two products. Even the art style... Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Chenghiz on February 11, 2008, 09:50:40 AM Saying these are unimpressive and liking the graphics in WoW is a pretty lol situation to me. These look like 1:1 copies of the WoW models. Which is to say, even polygon (or lack thereof) is accounted for. Just shows you how lowtech that shit is when it's put into a tangible form. In fact, having looked at them again, the models look better than their in-game counterparts. Unfortunately, still completely ugly. In comparison the line of action figures based off WoW characters looks great, and while they are larger it's easy to see that just increasing the amount of detail (turning some of the texture detail into actual geometry) makes them stand out a lot better. Quote Except that those things were and are competition? I know people firsthand who simply didn't have time to paint miniatures anymore so got their toys on a chessboard fix with the games you just mentioned. Hell, go to any GW focused messageboard and the great hope AND fear (depending on who you ask) is that GW makes a move to pre-painted Heroclix type stuff is great for people who are transitioning from MtG to miniatures or something like that but there's just a vast difference between the time investment and depth of gameplay between those and games like Warhammer. Also, most GW focused messageboards are full of mouthbreathing idiots, and that's really not an exaggeration at all. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Venkman on February 11, 2008, 01:45:20 PM And besides, it's not like the WH40k set is ignoring eBay. One buddy of mine makes all his gaming cash on painting miniatures. Five other buddies spend all their gaming cash on painted miniatures.
The WoW thing is different. Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Ingmar on February 11, 2008, 02:22:50 PM This isn't really competing with GW.
The main people who have something to potentially worry about here IMO: www.wizards.com/minis Title: Re: Blizzard to GW: Well - you gonna move in on my turf eh? Post by: Rondaror on February 11, 2008, 03:06:01 PM The games market is not necessarily divided into tabletop gamers and computer gamers, as the intersection between both is quite big. It's the gamer, having a hobby, like soccer or tennis, who wants to have fun, sharing his hobby with others. A MMO has the advantage of high accessibility, as you don't need a schedule to meet others in RL. You can just go online and start playing.
A fast food table top, like the Blizzard one, can introduce players into the table top world and is going to be more for the good of GW, then to the bad. MMO in general took their share of the gamers community (market), and let the table top games suffer from that...that's were the collapse of table top games started....of course the mighty TCG shit as well took a good portion of it. |