Author
|
Topic: Space Thread (Read 541759 times)
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
Nothing special, just thought it looks nice: A timelapse from Mars Express, who is orbiting since 2003. In this remarkable movie, the Visual Monitoring Camera (VMC) on Mars Express was used for the first time to image the limb of Mars during most of a complete orbit, showing in good detail the atmosphere seen ‘on edge’ at the apparent border between the planet’s surface and space.
The movie was stitched together from a series of 403 still images acquired by the camera during 13:45–19:09 GMT on 29 April 2016, during orbit 15624.
The spacecraft was commanded to turn as it orbited Mars, which kept the camera pointing at the brightest point on the horizon as Mars Express passed over the southern hemisphere.
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Jeff Kelly
Terracotta Army
Posts: 6921
I'm an apathetic, hedonistic, utilitarian, nihilistic existentialist.
|
landed it again. Damn it!
|
|
|
|
Mandella
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1236
|
landed it again. Damn it!
It's starting to be a trend!
|
|
|
|
Surlyboi
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10963
eat a bag of dicks
|
|
Tuned in, immediately get to watch cringey Ubisoft talking head offering her deepest sympathies to the families impacted by the Orlando shooting while flanked by a man in a giraffe suit and some sort of "horrifically garish neon costumes through the ages" exhibit or something. We need to stop this fucking planet right now and sort some shit out. -Kail
|
|
|
Sir T
Terracotta Army
Posts: 14223
|
Ran fine here on Firefox.
|
Hic sunt dracones.
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
This is kind of place to find a derelict starship full of eggs: It's 67P of course, taken by Rosetta two days ago. The Picture is an out-take of a wider image that has been rotated & cropped to produce the "I am standing on it" effect. Full view here
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Bungee
Terracotta Army
Posts: 897
|
|
Freedom is the raid target. -tazelbain
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
Not content with shitting up the Funny Picture thread with Polandballs I am now taking over the Space thread too! (Don't mean to be spammy, but it's a beautiful image...) Last nights Ariane 5 start - her (it's?) heaviest* so far - 10730 kg to GTO (Geostationary Transfer Orbit). The video itself worth a watch too, rare day launch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5P_8PNKsrE(*Heaviest to GTO, low earth orbit to ISS has been 21 tons)
|
|
« Last Edit: June 19, 2016, 09:27:06 AM by calapine »
|
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Mosesandstick
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2476
|
That is a beautiful shot, I wish there was a higher res version!
|
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
That is a beautiful shot, I wish there was a higher res version!
I wrote CNES and asked. No idea how they are about public outreach, but let's see.
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Morat20
Terracotta Army
Posts: 18529
|
Hubble got re-upped for five years. Hopefully by the time that runs out, Space-X can get a manned vehicle high enough for a quick-and-dirty service. (Batteries and gryos are what it really needs, although I'm sure there's a ton of instrument packages they could swap out).
JWST is going to be fantastic, but it's not looking at the same wavelengths. If they can keep Hubble running, it's worth the rather small investment.
|
|
|
|
Abagadro
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12227
Possibly the only user with more posts in the Den than PC/Console Gaming.
|
2001 is on TCM right now if you want to get in the mood for Juno's arrival.
|
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”
-H.L. Mencken
|
|
|
Mosesandstick
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2476
|
I wrote CNES and asked. No idea how they are about public outreach, but let's see.
Wow, thank you!
|
|
|
|
Lucas
Terracotta Army
Posts: 3298
Further proof that Italians have suspect taste in games.
|
Yep, it's now confirmed: a rocky planet orbits the binary star system of Proxima Centauri, our closest neighbor http://edition.cnn.com/2016/08/24/health/proxima-b-centauri-rocky-planet-habitable-zone-neighbor-star/index.htmlProxima b is a rocky, terrestrial planet with a surface -- unlike a gas giant, such as Jupiter -- that is 1.3 times the size of Earth and orbits its star every 11.2 days. It is in a close orbit of Proxima Centauri: only 5% of the distance between the Earth and the sun. They are even closer together than Mercury and the sun. But because its star is much cooler and fainter than our sun, Proxima b has a temperature that is suitable for liquid water to exist on the surface without evaporating. Researchers estimate that if the planet has an atmosphere, which could be assumed but isn't known, it may be between 86 to 104 degrees Fahrenheit on the surface. Without an atmosphere, it could be -22 to -40 degrees Fahrenheit. To put that in perspective, Earth would be -4 degrees if it didn't have an atmosphere, Reiners said. But, yeah, why it took so long to discover it, given the relatively small distance? It comes down to an understanding of the star this planet orbits, as well as how data collection has evolved during the last 16 years. Proxima Centauri is a low-mass red dwarf star, known as an M-class dwarf, that happens to be close to the bright binary star Alpha Centauri AB, which outshines its cool stepbrother, so to speak. All of these stars are within the faint Centaurus constellation, which can't be seen with the unaided eye. M-class dwarves are not well understood in comparison with other types of stars, Reiners said. Because of that, researchers don't know much about the history of these stars or their radiation in the early days. "But within the field of exoplants, [researchers] have recently realized that looking for planets around M dwarves is what is going to be the most spectacular, because you can find these plants in the liquid water zone more easily than other stars," Reiners said.
Because it's an active star, Proxima Centauri can behave in varied ways that mimic the presence of a planet, according to the study. Researchers wanted to observe it for a long period of time, so for the first half of this year, telescopes around the world were pointed at Proxima Centauri. The researchers looked for a "Doppler wobble," or back and forth wobble of Proxima Centauri that would be caused by the gravitational pull of a planet in orbit. This was combined with research, data and published studies of Proxima Centauri dating to 2000. "The significance of the detection went sky high," Anglada-Escudé said. "Statistically, there was no doubt. We have found a planet around Proxima Centauri." More stuff in the article linked above. Excited Can't wait for my next four or five incarnations or so: I want to embark on the inevitable "noah's ark" that is going to head there
|
" He's so impatient, it's like watching a teenager fuck a glorious older woman." - Ironwood on J.J. Abrams
|
|
|
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576
|
What would the radiation and mag fields be like that close to the star?? Is it a linear degradation with temperature?
|
"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom." -Samwise
|
|
|
pxib
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4701
|
Mag field decays really quick, and radiation is going to be significantly less than it is here on Earth because red dwarfs release orders of magnitude fewer of the higher energy particles to begin with. The big trouble is that solar flares on some red dwarfs are just as impressive as the ones on yellow dwarfs like our sun, and the smaller distance they have to travel they'd be considerably less diffuse... and that could be pretty devastating. Proxima is just such a creature, and produces occasional bursts of X-ray fun.
Also it would always be, to our eyes, darker on the planet since so much of the radiation is in the invisible infra-red.
|
if at last you do succeed, never try again
|
|
|
Bungee
Terracotta Army
Posts: 897
|
|
Freedom is the raid target. -tazelbain
|
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
I went through a video of the explosion with a Frame-By-Frame function. The two images are ~ 16 milliseconds apart, source is a 60 FPS recording Youtube
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Chimpy
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10622
|
While it sucks that this happened, I think an event like this was needed and long overdue.
Musk's (and by extension, SpaceX's) hubris needed to be reigned in a bit. There have been reports of shoddy QA/QC on their manufacturing processes for years and they have been given a pass by the nerdisphere because "Musk is a visionary!" and "SpaceX hasn't had a failure in forever!". I am not saying that this was due to a manufacturing defect, but the "build it faster and cheaper, we need to ramp up our schedule because MARS!" attitude is pervasive and has the potential to be dangerous.
It happening now where the only loss was a few hundred million in hardware and a slipped launch schedule is much better than if it happened during a manned flight. Treating everything in the world as sonething that should be done in a Silicon Valley dot.com startup fashion is a dangerous outlook to have.
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2016, 12:52:38 PM by Chimpy »
|
|
'Reality' is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
While it sucks that this happened, I think an event like this was needed and long overdue.
Musk's (and by extension, SpaceX's) hubris needed to be reigned in a bit. There have been reports of shoddy QA/QC on their manufacturing processes for years and they have been given a pass by the nerdisphere because "Musk is a visionary!" and "SpaceX hasn't had a failure in forever!". I am not saying that this was due to a manufacturing defect, but the "build it faster and cheaper, we need to ramp up our schedule because MARS!" attitude is pervasive and has the potential to be dangerous.
It happening now where the only loss was a few hundred million in hardware and a slipped launch schedule is much better than if it happened during a manned flight. Treating everything in the world as sonething that should be done in a Silicon Valley dot.com startup fashion is a dangerous outlook to have.
Some months ago I went through Glassdoor reviews of SpaceX and complains about practices on the workshop floor (so workers, not the engineers) cropped up a lot. What I remember: "You don't get decent training from the supervisor, its figure it out yourself" "People work in sneakers, no safety shoes" "Higher ups are all ex-car managers and have no clue about work procedures in aerospace manufacture" This seems to fit as well: Putting the payload on the rocket before the hotfire test - to save one single day - just cost them (their customer) > $300 million. (The satellite was insured, but only AFTER rocket ignition...ouch)
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2016, 01:13:32 PM by calapine »
|
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23637
|
Hacking rocket science and space travel -- what could possibly go wrong?
|
|
|
|
Phildo
|
Hacking rocket science and space travel -- what could possibly go wrong?
|
|
|
|
Strazos
Greetings from the Slave Coast
Posts: 15542
The World's Worst Game: Curry or Covid
|
Some would call that a disaster; I'd call it an adventure.
|
Fear the Backstab! "Plato said the virtuous man is at all times ready for a grammar snake attack." - we are lesion "Hell is other people." -Sartre
|
|
|
TheWalrus
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4320
|
Better to learn it now, than when people are on board. Echoes of the Challenger bullshit.
|
vanilla folders - MediumHigh
|
|
|
Khaldun
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15182
|
|
|
|
|
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12006
You call it an accident. I call it justice.
|
Some would call that a disaster; I'd call it an adventure. I call it justice.
|
Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
|
|
|
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42651
the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring
|
Wait, they put the payload on the rocket for the TEST? To save themselves a day?
HOLY FUCK. My first thought when I read about the explosion being on a test run and not the final flight was "well, at least they didn't blow up their probably very expensive payload."
... the fuck?
|
|
|
|
|
Mandella
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1236
|
Wait, they put the payload on the rocket for the TEST? To save themselves a day?
HOLY FUCK. My first thought when I read about the explosion being on a test run and not the final flight was "well, at least they didn't blow up their probably very expensive payload."
... the fuck?
I'm not a rocket scientist either, just a guy who tries to keep up with this stuff, so take the following accordingly. As I understand the process, the rocket has been static fired and pressurization tested already. This test was more accurately a pre-flight dress rehearsal, where all systems were brought up to launch readiness together. Since the satellite connections and pre-flight programming are some of the things being tested, it doesn't make a lot of sense to not have the payload in place while doing it. At this point only small bugs should be remaining anyway -- the sort of things that could cause a short hold during actual launch, but might cause the launch window to be missed. Clearly, something more than a small bug remained. But since the launch was going to be in less than two days whatever flaw caused the explosion now would have likely caused the explosion then. I have no idea what de Selding is going on about. (He's with Spaceflight News isn't he? -- I couldn't find the article where he supported his tweet.) This is not Kerbal. You don't just snap the payload off the stack with a mouse. If you are going to do a pad test then you'll need to drop the rocket back horizontally, move it back to the assembly area, attach the payload, move it back and set back vertical. Then you'd need to test it again because moving it means things changed. Now what SpaceX *had* been considering was to skip this test altogether, since they figured they had the pre-flight pretty well nailed down by now. Again, clearly not. Insurance: Launch insurance does not kick in because there was no launch. (As an aside, if it had blown up on launch day it would still not kick in, since it blew pre-ignition.) However, standard accident and loss insurance does. There is a report that Musk does not insure his rockets, but the pre-launch payload insurance is actually (as far as I understand it) the responsibility of of the payload owner. I have no idea what their policy particulars are, but probably not as good as the launch failure payout, which normally includes time and service loss compensation. Zuckerberg: Facebook had planned to lease some of the satellite's bandwidth for a few years, and thus Zuckerberg used the words "our satellite" in his own post on the matter. So some mainstream media has been reporting "SpaceX Blast Destroys Facebook Satellite." Yes, poor wording by Zuckerberg completely collapsed the media's factchecking ability. More News at Eleven (or not). tl;dr version, IMHO the problem was not the test, but whatever screwup caused the blast, and that is where accusations of poor work practices have some validity. I don't know. I've got no inside view on SpaceX at all. Wish I did, even if it was just running the cafeteria. But personally I'm going to hold off joining the witchhunt until some more information comes out revealing just what exactly went wrong. Oh, postscript I guess. If it had happened with actual crew onboard (assuming launch day, they would not have been onboard during the test), then the crew safety system would have lifted them and the capsule away from the blast. Assuming it worked right of course, but hey, at least they have one designed in, unlike the Shuttle where we flew it in deathtrap configuration for decades and just got used to the fact that if anything went wrong it was just going to be a full party wipe.
|
|
« Last Edit: September 02, 2016, 09:37:57 AM by Mandella »
|
|
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
Wait, they put the payload on the rocket for the TEST? To save themselves a day?
HOLY FUCK. My first thought when I read about the explosion being on a test run and not the final flight was "well, at least they didn't blow up their probably very expensive payload."
... the fuck?
I have no idea what de Selding is going on about. (He's with Spaceflight News isn't he? -- I couldn't find the article where he supported his tweet.) This is not Kerbal. You don't just snap the payload off the stack with a mouse. If you are going to do a pad test then you'll need to drop the rocket back horizontally, move it back to the assembly area, attach the payload, move it back and set back vertical. Then you'd need to test it again because moving it means things changed. Now what SpaceX *had* been considering was to skip this test altogether, since they figured they had the pre-flight pretty well nailed down by now. Yes, he is the Spacenews Paris Bureau chief. SpaceX used to perform the final static fire tests without the payload attached, then - if successful - lower the rocket, wheel it to the integration building, attach the payload, and erect it again for final launch. As seen below: The image is from the static fire test for the SES-8 sat launch (3 days before scheduled launch), taken on the same launchpad (SLC-40) as yesterdays rocket. As can be seen there is no payload fairing on top. Some time ago SpaceX started doing the tests with the satellites already on board, thus avoiding one work step. Which now backfired...
|
|
« Last Edit: September 02, 2016, 10:17:32 AM by calapine »
|
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
Mandella
Terracotta Army
Posts: 1236
|
Wait, they put the payload on the rocket for the TEST? To save themselves a day?
HOLY FUCK. My first thought when I read about the explosion being on a test run and not the final flight was "well, at least they didn't blow up their probably very expensive payload."
... the fuck?
I have no idea what de Selding is going on about. (He's with Spaceflight News isn't he? -- I couldn't find the article where he supported his tweet.) This is not Kerbal. You don't just snap the payload off the stack with a mouse. If you are going to do a pad test then you'll need to drop the rocket back horizontally, move it back to the assembly area, attach the payload, move it back and set back vertical. Then you'd need to test it again because moving it means things changed. Now what SpaceX *had* been considering was to skip this test altogether, since they figured they had the pre-flight pretty well nailed down by now. Yes, he is the Spacenews Paris Bureau chief. SpaceX used to perform the final static fire tests without the payload attached, then - if successful - lower the rocket, wheel it to the integration building, attach the payload, and erect it again for final launch. As seen below: The image is from the static fire test for the SES-8 sat launch (3 days before scheduled launch), taken on the same launchpad (SLC-40) as yesterdays rocket. As can be seen there is no payload fairing on top. Some time ago SpaceX started doing the tests with the satellites already on board, thus avoiding one work step. Which now backfired... Okay found it. Yeah they changed their procedure in 2014, although saying it was done solely to save money and time is arguable. In any case, I imagine SpaceX is re-examining that decision now...
|
|
|
|
Chimpy
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10622
|
The fact that they ever did vertical testing without the payload is the weird thing.
Pretty much all other horizontal integrators flip the rocket upright once when it reaches the pad and don't tilt it back down to avoid additional stress on the rocket. Also, it makes no sense to test the systems in a non integrated state and give it a green light for the launch as tilting it down and adding things changes the configuration/loading.
|
'Reality' is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
|
|
|
calapine
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7352
Solely responsible for the thread on "The Condom Wall."
|
The fact that they ever did vertical testing without the payload is the weird thing.
Pretty much all other horizontal integrators flip the rocket upright once when it reaches the pad and don't tilt it back down to avoid additional stress on the rocket. Also, it makes no sense to test the systems in a non integrated state and give it a green light for the launch as tilting it down and adding things changes the configuration/loading.
The 'entire rocket hotfire test' is an SpaceX speciality. Neither ULA, Arianespace nor the Russians do it. For Ariane5 I know the main engine will be fired twice as part of acceptance testing before delivery, but that's before it's part of the rocket stack.
|
Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic!
|
|
|
|
|