Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 07, 2024, 05:27:47 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  The Gaming Graveyard  |  MMOG Discussion  |  Topic: Planetside 2 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 102 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Planetside 2  (Read 721612 times)
UnSub
Contributor
Posts: 8064


WWW
Reply #1400 on: March 08, 2012, 11:07:55 PM

Has catering to a broader audience ever worked in a genre that is already dripping with choices?

WoW.

Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1401 on: March 21, 2014, 06:18:15 AM


Apparently you can bling out your gat.


Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12003

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1402 on: March 21, 2014, 07:39:48 AM


Apparently you can bling out your gat.



So no scattermag? Well fuck... the disappointments keep right on rolling.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1403 on: March 23, 2014, 09:14:22 AM

Quote
    Q: Will there be additional NS and ES vehicles added in later patches?

    A: Keep in mind that each of the vehicles has different roles that it can play based on personalization. That will add a lot. But yea, we'll be adding more vehicles in the future for sure.

    Q: What lessons learned from PS have been introduced into PS2?

    A: I think the most important ones are on things like downtime and getting players to the action faster.

    Q: Will only certain people be able to spawn as squad leaders? Will there be a slot for a commander that controls their teams resources or makes calls on where missions should take place? Are there restrictions in place to allow only experienced players fill the role as commander?

    A: Nope, its all about who follows you - no hard restrictions.

    Q: One of the things that people(including myself) were concerned about over at /r/planetside was the idea of dedicated drivers being removed for MBTs. Shifting from the model used in planetside(driver + main gunner(and sometimes secondary gunner)) to a battlefield style, where the driver controls the main cannon. Does the team have any plans to address this concern?

    A: I've talked quite a bit about the driver gunner issue on MBTs in the past, so I don't want to rehash it too much. Suffice to say, drivers will be the gunners for tanks and MAY eventually be able to spec into having a dedicated gunner - that way the newer players don't feel ripped off that they can't shoot their tank and the really dedicated guys can have a dedicated experience with potentially some additional unlockable weapons for dedicated gunners to balance the # of players required

    Q: Will there be a "boot up" time for vehicles to prevent people hopping in and out of them to repair and hopping back in instantly?

    A: We'll probably implement a brief bootup time for vehicles.

    Q: Will we be able to show of medals and merits och chest (don't remember where it was and what the name of it was) but kill X people with X rifle/vehicle and get a medal to display.. in Planetside 2?

    A: We don't currently allow display of merits/medals on characters.

    Q: The Cross-Contintent strategic depth seems to be gone from PS2, by looking at the way continents are set up with 3 "sancutaries" at opposite locations. Will the cross-continent play exist in PS2 as it did in PS1, making a locked-out faction unable to hack any base unless that base was drained of NTU?

    A: One of our goals with the game was to keep more of the world active at any given time. Part of that is because we honestly can't produce the number of continents that were in PlanetSide with the level of hand crafted detail we're putting into them - so we need to use them more efficiently. So, looking purely at it through PS1 goggles it's less strategic since we don't have continent locks, but there are a lot of other nuances with the territory control system that should help retain a strong sense of strategic gameplay.

    Q: What I enjoyed about the Cert system of PS1 was the ability to use my variety of skills to quickly fit into a situation. For example, sneak into a base full of people(which is a rush in itself), hack out a MAX suit and wreak havoc. Will the class system make this sort of strategy impossible?

    A:No, the type of situation you just described is completely possible in Planetside 2.

    Q: Have you considered selling voice-packs(A:k.a greenhorn, rough, etc) in the store as a cosmetic item? If so, have you considered doing a voice-over yourself?

    A: Yes, we have. I even wanted to get some of the original voice macro packs on the store. Dunno about doing one myself, I HATE hearing my own voice, I can't even watch any of the Planetside 2 promotional stuff because of it.

    Q: As a long time fan of Planetside, seeing that you're using punkbuster really makes me nervous. It's widely known that punkbuster not only doesn't stop hackers, it annoys legit players because it often fails to update properly. Free to play will greatly exacerbate the hacking problems which are bound to happen with punkbuster.

    A: Punkbuster is going to be one facet of our anti-cheating strategy, not the only thing. I don't want to go too deep into this except to say that we hate hackers as much as you guys do, and we'll be doing everything we can to make sure that Planetside 2 is as hacker-free as possible. I also pinged our Technical Director to see if he had any additional info on this, here's what he said: "Anti-hacking is obviously very, very important to us. We pay attention to what the community is saying about it, and want everyone to know not a day goes by that we aren’t thinking about ways to better our anti-cheats/anti-hacks. Make no mistake, though, Punkbuster is just one of the tools in our toolbelt, it is by no means something we’re just leaning on. We have over a decade of experience with people doing everything they can do to get into our games, and even so we will do a better job with Planetside 2 than we have done before. As far as Tribes, I would suggest that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

    Q: About how big is the team developing Planetside 2? What kind of "resources" is Sony throwing at it? Any other details of the behind-the-scenes you could lend some insight on?

    A: Right now the game team is about 90 people. It's a seriously badass group of developers with tons of experience across MMO and FPS games. We're definitely putting a lot of effort into making this game, it's a passion project for not just the team but SOE as a whole all the way up to the brass.

    Q: What other mmos have you worked on other than PS2

    A: I've worked at SOE for over 10 years, I started in QA working on the original EverQuest expansions (around the time of Velious). My first design gig was on Star Wars: Galaxies where i mostly did data monkey work. on EverQuest 2 I created a lot of game systems such as the collections system, the arena pets system, exploration, lore and legends quests, etc etc. More recently I was the User interface / user experience lead on Free Realms and the creative director for Clone Wars Adventures.

    Q: Surgile, yay or nay?

    A: nay! in fact we don't have an activatable runspeed buff. All of our implants are passive.

    Q: I just wanted to say thank you.. for making a sequel to the greatest game I ever played. Just one question, will there be an acquisition timer for MAX's again ?

    A: We may have to institute a cool down on MAXes although we don't have one at the moment... like many things we're going to really see where the rubber meets the road once we get to betA:

    Q: Will the MAXes use the new shield system or will they retain the old armour system and still need repairs from engineers? What hit detection does PS2 use? Is it a client-side one, a server-side or a mix between them

    A: Right now MAXes use armor, they're the only infantry class without a shield and do require engineers to support them. The hit detection is a mix, there are clientside and serverside checks.

    Q: I know it's probably too early to give any exact answers, but I was wondering: How large is the initial beta wave expected would be? Considering how many copies of PC Gamer sold, and how many PS1 vets there are, how will players be prioritized as to who gets in first? Will opt-in sign ups even have a chance at getting in until much later?

    A: Not totally sure how large the initial beta wave will be. Probably in the hundreds - thousand range. That prioritized queue is a pool, so we'll pull from that pool until it's empty. This will all be based on our project needs. Beta is a really important tool for us on the game dev side and we need to be sure that we're getting our needs met so that we can make the best game possible. Opt-in signups will be invited later, again, as needed.

    Q: What feature in PS2 are you most excited about that wasn't in PS1? As in, what new addition do you think will "make" the game?

    A: I really hope the territory control system works as well as we think it will. If it does, it'll add a ton of freedom and strategic choices to the meta-game and keep the feeling of the game fresh every time you play, rather than playing in the same areas of the same continents over and over again.

    Q: Will the customization system focus on skins/textures or will there also be the option of changing parts of the model for the classes as well? ie. shoulder pads, helmets, boots, etc.

    A: There will be geometry changes possible with the cosmetic customization... we're trying to be careful to not go too overboard here though so that we maintain recognizable class silhouettes. There are a lot of VS screenshots out there! Tramell is a VS die hard (and die often) so he sneaks in VS screenshots as much as possible.

    Q: In PS2, every vehicle has some kind of mine protection,and everybody can use C4, no Spitfire turrets in PS2,no personal armor repair. What is there for an Engineer to do besides repair vehicles and place a manned turret? Can you place a manned turret almost anywhere or are you limited ,like in PS1?

    A: Engineers will have other tricks up their sleeves besides just the turret, being able to place dynamic cover, mines, and the like. Although vehicles will be able to have mine guards, they'll be giving up something to do that, so the assumption that everything will be safe from mines isn't totally accurate. Right now turrets can be placed virtually anywhere, but some restrictions may be added if we find it being heavily exploited in betA:

    Q: Will there be joystick support for aircraft when the beta goes live?

    A: Yes. I got a pretty slick Logitech G940 force feedback setup with rudders and a thrust stick the other day, it's a lot of fun to fly with.

    Q: What are the basic classes that everyone is going to get at first and will there be any unlockable ones?

    A: Currently no classes are "locked" from day one you can play any of the classes or drive any of the vehicles in the game. You can also freely switch between classes at equipment terminals or when respawning so you're never locked into a class. Each vehicle and class will have tons of customization and multiple roles to specialize in based on certification, so there will be role based things to unlock (i.e. being a surveillance focused infiltrator rather than a sniping focused infiltrator, etc)

    Q: Have you guys locked down what classes are going to be in the game?

    A: Yes, absolutely. We have 6 right now:

        Light Assault - quick strike commando type unit
        Heavy Assault - strong anti-vehicle or anti-infantry troop
        Engineer - combat deployables and vehicle support
        Medic - keeps you from being a blood smear on the ground
        Infiltrator - sneaky sniper / gadgeteer with cloaking suit
        M.A:X - large mechanized battle suit suitable for anti-air, anti-vehicle and anti-infantry depending on loadout

    Q: Will there be a way to "lock" a continent for your empire like in PS1?

    A: Right now we don't have the concept of continent locking. Each empire has a small foothold on each continent and can fight on them at any time. We're doing this because we want more areas of the world to be under contention at any given time than PlanetSide 1 tended to have. As with most things, this is something we'll adjust in beta if the need arises.

    Q: Is it possible for the PS2 server to handle thousands of players in one hexagon or at one base? or is there some kind of in game system thing that stops this from occurring? The largest battles in Planetside 1 had pretty rough framerates. So I'm wondering how this will be handled this time around.

    A: Truthfully any time 1000 players decide to stand next to each other you're going to have some problems. Luckily in Planetside you'll be most likely killing some percentage of those guys before they totally fill up your screen. We don't have any planned heavy handed methods to keep people from travelling where they want to within a continent, but we will be doing things like putting missions up to encourage players to spread out and keep around optimal player populations in battle areas.

    Q: What is your contingency plan if one of the factions get extremely under populated (let's say less than 10%)?

    A: Faction balance is a tricky problem for sure... it's one of the things on the project that keeps me up at night. Right now our plans are all positive incentives to play on the teams that have a lower population, we're trying to stay away from negative consequences for over-populated teams, although if we get a real problem with over population we'll probably have to do something heavy handed like that.

    Q: Spying - I am concerned about the ability to spy in a F2P game. What's stopping me from creating an account on an opposing faction, only to gather intelligence about troop locations, movement, and plans? I can use this information to my advantage. For example, I can gather data about how to flank a troop movement, inform my faction that a base was just left empty, or have my outfit change specs based on if a platoon is air heavy, vehicle heavy, etc... Please explain any mechanisms you have to deter people from doing things like this.

    A: Spying is another issue. We won't be stopping you from creating a player on enemy empires, we just can't. We'll have a good, robust grief system in place to keep you from being able to kill all the defenders of a base before going in yourself on your other empire, but that is definitely a challenge to combat.

    Q: AI (stated long term goal) - Would this be Auto-defense on bases? Attackable convoys for resources? Please no bots or companions, thanks.

    A: We have LONG term plans to add AI in the form of a fourth faction, we'll see if that pans out, but it should be pretty cool. Auto-turrets are something we could do right now but we just aren't - we want defense to be player-active, not passive. Might change in the future if necessary.

    Q: Humbly request the ability to prone at some point (your last AMA said no plans currently), even if it's not initial release. It just really helps with the realism aspect.

    A: Prone probably won't happen, if we do it it'd be well after release.

    Q: As a NC player, will I be able to buy or loot a Pulsar or Cycler? They all showed up in the cash shop and looked to be obtainable.

    A: The marketplace offerings we showed at GDC aren't representative of the final offerings, you won't be able to acquire cross-factional weapons. We also don't have looting in the game right now, although that's an ongoing debate.

    Q: Will the air vehicles have countermeasures to combat enemy AA missiles?

    A: Air vehicles will absolutely be able to equip countermeasures, although they'll be trading other functionality to do so.

    Q: In PS1, anti-armor rockets were near useless on infantry... In BF3 they were one-shot kills on infantry. Will PS2 rockets be closer to BF or PS?

    A: Direct rocket hits will probably kill light infantry classes in PS2, but the splash damage is tuned to not be as devastating to infantry as in BF3.

    Q: Will ANTs and NTUs still be a thing?

    A: Right now we don't have a concept of ANTs, but we still have logistical elements for sure, mobile respawn and resupply and the sort. Our facility capture gameplay is quite a bit different than the first game, though.

    Q: I heard they weren't going to include the Phantasm in PS2, why is that?

    A: Our goal with vehicles was to get as many different vehicle roles covered with the smallest number of vehicle and player customization. A Galaxy with a cloak module that had some strong tradeoffs might fill the void felt by Phantasm users at some point...

    Q: Will there be organizational tools for outfit leaders?

    A: A lot of our hopes for massive coordination both for outfits and in general rely on the mission system. Our design for the mission system is that players (including your outfit leaders) can create missions which are then accepted by players to complete. Ideally by having various levels of granularity we will allow large groups of people to coordinate without the overhead. We've got a lot of work to do to make this perfect, and my hope is that by having some big organized outfits helping us out in beta we can hammer out all the features that you guys want / need in order to have the best possible experience.

    Q: Have you guys decided on including a premium subscription yet?

    A: We will have a premium membership, although we haven't locked down exactly what that will include. Our goal has always been to create the game first and then build the business model that best services the game, rather than trying to conform the game to some particular business or membership model.

    Q: Will Planetside 2 make vehicles/deploy-able assets feel valuable and worth protecting?

    A: Vehicles you spawn will cost you personal resources, so you'll definitely want to keep them alive and not just toss them away.

    Q: How does day combat differ from night combat?

    A: Our plan is to make nighttime dynamic. Sometimes (like when there is a full moon) it might not be TOO dark, but other times it'll be really dark and having nightvision / spot lights will be highly advantageous.

    Q: Which community are you more looking forward to getting feedback from in the beta, the MW / BF players or the Planetside 1 players?

    A: I think each of those groups you mentioned (as well as non-shooter MMO players, old school arena shooter players, etc) will have valid feedback and concerns. The PlanetSide community is going to have the most expertise about how the massive shooter gameplay works, for sure.

    Q: PS2 looks so amazing, but I'm so very scared of it being too laggy in both framerate and network to play on such a massive scale as like.. 500+ people being in the same zone.

    A: We have a lot of projections and tests with hundreds and thousands of bot clients. Lag, network and framerate, are huge concerns for us also. These sorts of problems are why making MMO games are so difficult -- luckily we have a bit of experience with solving them.

    Q: Do we have the same Health/Armor mechanic in PS2 as we had in PS1, or is armor going to be more of a "damage reduction" thing? How is that mechanic working?

    A: Armor does have some damage mitigation properties, but it's a bit more flat than PS1. We have shields too which can be customized and will have various configurations per class.

    Q: Have you decided on a Vanu MAX ability yet?

    A: Still haven't finalized VS MAX abilities. What do you guys think would be cool?

    Q: Is the TR tank still going to require three people to be fully functional?

    A: No, the TR tank will be fully functional with the same crew compliment as the other ES tanks.

    Q: Will we be able to do old school "Generator-drop-and-hold" operations to seriously inconvenience the baddies, like we could back in Planetside 1?

    A: You'll definitely be able to do some cool coordinated behind-enemy-lines attacks - generator drop-and-hold isn't quite what it is since we don't have Lattice anymore, but similar concepts for sure.

    Q: Have you nailed down any of the Outfit game mechanics more than when we last talked?

    A: Outfit advancement mechanics are still in flux enough that I don't really want to commit on what it will look like quite yet.

    Q: How is F2P and the store going to work in beta? Will things be purchasable? Will purchases carry over after launch?

    A: once we're reasonably sure that we won't do any character wipes we might unlock commerce during betA:

    Q: Taunts, how are those going to work? Any cool ones?

    A: Taunts will play on the enemy screen when activated, we haven't implemented this system yet so I can't tell you which ones I think are cool yet

    Q: Spotting, max distance? Is it a cheap way to spot things? How do you intend to implement it?

    A: There will be a max distance on spotting, and a max number of spotted targets, we've been thinking about ways to make this a bit cooler and work better with massive battles - so don't expect it to be just like BF3 or something.

    Q: Will there be HATS?

    A: Yep, we have hats.

    Q: K : D... Is there something better to focus people on in what is essentially an objective based game? Score:death?

    A: Achievements. K : D is easily understandable and usually meaningful. Scoreeath may be another metric we surface.

    Q: Visual customisation, how in depth will it be? Customisation on the same level as changing individual armour parts like Halo maybe?

    A: it won't be as robust as Halo, they didn't need to worry about hundreds of players with hundreds of customizations. Ours will be leaner.

    Q: eSports, how do you intend to implement this? You've made hints about intending to.

    A: Tournament modes are something we've talked about adding post-launch. It's something i'm really passionate about so I'm looking forward to it.

    Q: Eyefinity, will it work? Also, track IR?

    A: Not sure on Eyefinity and TrackIR, we have them on our compatibility list but we haven't do anything to specifically implement either so far.

    Q: Do you guys use in-house tools to design the levels? I know the engine is in-house, but...what do you use to build the levels?

    A: we build our maps with an in house terrain tool and objects built in Maya and Zbrush

    Q: Entropy in cash transactions and trading? Bit like TF2 boxes and keys? Will that kind of thing be in?

    A: there is a design on the table about random loot (crate) type system. It's a fairly common mechanic in F2P games, dating back several years, and obviously it works quite well in TF2. We'll see...

    Q: Will all Implants be consumable (such as the XP Booster that we heard about)? Or will there be some that are slottable and remain indefinitely, such as a Fast-Reload Implant that might work like a CoD perk?

    A: All implants are consumable. They're a pretty important drain in our resource economy.

    Q: What are some Engineer-specific explosives? We've learned that some/all Classes have access to C4/Boomers/demopaks, and TwoThreeSix said that Engineers get the widest array of tactical bombs. What are some of them?

    A: Engineers are dope. They're exclusively able to deploy tank mines, they also have armor piercing underbarrel launchers which are exclusive. They'll have a turret that shoots explosive shells, through the cert system engineers can specialize in different explosives like HE claymores which do additional damage and we're playing around with having anti-AOE certs on them that cut down on damage taken through explosives (so they can hang out near vehicles and not get chewed up by the explosive damage as much)

    Q: Does the Combat Medic have access to heavier weapons than the Engineer? (ie- the Combat Medics in the amazing GDC demo were wielding non-carbine variants of their ES rifles; can Engineers wield non-carbine variants/assault variants as well?).

    A: Engineers and Medics will probably have very similar weapon classes, engineers are going to have the advantage of being able to deploy turrets that are extremely powerful, though stationary.

    Q: How many slots will an Engineer have available to them to carry devices/deployables? Will they be able to carry more than one device at a time? And/or would their be a sidegrade that allowed them to drop another kind of item (such as their sidearm or nanite-repair tool) in favor of holding two deployable items at a time?

    A: We're still messing around with the rules for this, right now they have a tool that allows them to deploy a variety of combat engineering - we'll probably break this apart and make you select what you'll be deploying ahead of time (maybe in a few buckets of available deployables)

    Q: Will it support SLI/Crossfire?

    A: We will support both SLI and Crossfire.

    Q: How does changing factions work? Like a cool down period before you can switch?

    A: You select an empire when you create your character and from then on you're locked into that empire. Since Planetside 2 is a free-to-play game there is no limit on the number of characters you could create to try out the other empires, though!

    Q: I've heard it said that a veteran player would have up to a 20% advantage over newbies, disregarding skill. Is this 20% from straight upgrades, or simply being more equipped to handle certain scenarios via sidegrades? both?

    A: This is sort of misleading... I'll try to clarify.

    Our goal is to allow no more than a ~20% variance in player power between someone whose unlocked lots of stuff and optimized their build and someone who hasn't. We really want the determining factor in any mano-a-mano battle to be player skill, no upgrades, implants, or whatever. So ideally a 5 minute player and a 5 year player can be competitive with one another.

    The vast majority of items that you can unlock are "sidegrades" that present some tradeoffs, i'm giving up damage to get a faster firing rate or giving up runspeed to carry a bigger gun. Obviously certain combinations of these will have benefits that aren't strictly 100% perfectly balanced against every other choice, but we hope to keep these imbalances to under 20% so that the competitive landscape can be maintained.

    Things that you'll be able to straight-up "upgrade" would be potentially things like having minor health regeneration, minor runspeed buffs, time to switch to ADS with different scopes, etc. Again, all totaled, we don't expect or want those differences to exceed a 20% variance.

    Q: There has been a lot of concern over the "cash" shop if you will and one thing you've always said is you won't be able to buy power, but "convenience" items are on the table. I'm almost more worried about that because what that seems like to me is faster respawn, lower timers, things like that.

    A: for me, "power" means i'm buying something that when I stand toe to toe with you gives me an advantage that you don't have. I have more health so it takes you longer to kill me, I have more bullets so I don't have to reload as often, etc.

    While faster respawn times or my ability to acquire resources faster are, from a certain point of view, increasing my power it doesn't affect my ability to kill you and your ability to kill me, so, to me isn't "buying power". Now, if your entire empire buys a theoretical implant that lets you respawn faster, your empire has a power advantage because they spend less time dead, but that's a kind of abstract view of things and kind of unrealistic. In reality, you're personally trading money for time - buying convenience, and that, in my book, is okay. I'm positive this will spark debate, and I'm looking forward to reading it!

    Q: How much of an importance will stealth be for Infiltrators? Will they be able to use the night/shadows and cloaking to sneak past people or will people just be able to spam markers on them and then the entire enemy team can just see that?

    A: Infiltrators will have a lot of different options, we see them being specialized to be 100% cloaked sneaky behind-enemy-lines guys who stab enemies to death or setup explosives, or as sniping / recon guys with weaker cloaks (time limited, limited visibility) who use their cloak to move from location to location and for "oh shit" moments when someone sneaks up on them. There will be a lot of possibilities, infiltrators are probably the most diverse class right now.

    Q: Are you guys going to consider bringing back the old voice commands from PS1?

    A: We have something similar (although simpler) than PS1. I really want to bring the VOICES back as customization.

    Q: I've heard you or one of the other developers say that you're focused on sidegrading rather than upgrading. Still, will max-level players have any sort of upgrade (or feature/ability) that low level players don't have?

    A: One of our goals is to keep a strong sense of competition between veterans and newer players. Obviously veterans will already have huge advantages in terms of knowing the game, knowing what weapons to use in what situations, etc. That's already quite a bit of advantages without layering on game mechanic advantages on top of it!

    Q: How will intercontinental travel work, Will I be able to fly my reaver into a warpgate to defend a base on a different cont. more speedy, or will have have to deconstruct in a spawn tube, load in a base wait a timer our possibly and spawn all over again.

    A: You'll be able to use warpgates to take vehicles from continent to continent.

    Q: Are we going to have destructible base components, I.E spawn tubes, Terms. Generators. On that, will I have to switch to a engineering class to repair theses. I.E if a gen is down and i cannot switch to this class could i possibly pull a glue gun out of a locker in a light class to repair the fallen gen?

    A: We'll have destructible objectives like equipment terminals in bases and engineers will be able to repair them.

    Q: A big part of the first one was side strafing, aka warping, will this be a valid tact ( or frustration to some people) in PS2

    A: We're doing everything we can to make the ADAD spamming not be possible in PS2.

    Q: Will we be seeing higher in Hacking like in PS1. I.E hack the command console of a base and disable radar. Poison turrets, So on and So fourth.

    A: We have a lot of plans for post-launch hacking enhancements, at ship it will most likely be fairly rudimentary since hacking isn't a big focus for us right now.

    Q: During the GDC demo I noticed a bunch of Object popping. I.E a tree would come out of nowhere, I'm assuming this is becuase of the alpha nature of PS2 right now. On that in terms of a graphical standpoint could a player tweek lets say flora density to improve gameplay performance?

    A: We don't have options for disabling flora right now. Anything that can affect gameplay we want to remain on, i.e. you can't disable weather, sunbeams, etc. This stuff is client side so it's probably not too difficult for someone to disable if they really wanted to.

    Q: Can explosives be attached to friendly maxes? What are the current limitations or thoughts on where it can be placed?

    A: Probably not on friendly MAXes. Enemy MAXes though, for sure.

    Q: Has there been any internal discussion about redesigning the magrider to function more like the TR and NC tanks with a free rotating turret and broader appearance?

    A: Lots of discussion, the current plan is to stick with the Magrider as is.

    Q: [VOICE] Are there persistent channels that exist, that officers in an outfit can have moderating privileges over?

    A: You'll have a guild channel that you have moderation controls of. We may allow you to create sub-channels.

    Q: [VOICE] Is there an ability to join more than one channel at a time? Such as, Outfit General, or Outfit Command

    A: If we allow multiple channels you'll be able to join multiple channels, toggling between them for push-to-talk might be an issue, you may have to bind several talk keys.

    Q: Can non-outfit individuals join our outfit channel if we wish?

    A: Right now no non-outfit players would be allowed in the outfit chat.

    Q: Is there an ability to tie out of game capabilities with the voice server, so we can see who is online without logging in game?

    A: You'll be able to see who is online without having to go in game.

    Q: Can a player create their own channel that isn't tied to an outfit/squad/vehicle that will remain persistent even if they log off?

    A: Right now there isn't ad hoc channel creation, but I imagine it would be fairly easy to add if that was a common request.

    Q: Will in-game voice be able to be detected by enemy players in close proximity? If that's not a baseline feature, will there be something like an implant that will let you eavesdrop?

    A: No, no cross-empire ease-dropping

    Q: T-ray described the Scythe flying like a UFO. Does that mean that it 'strafes' in mid-air? If not, can you elaborate on how it flies?

    A: It can move vertically and laterally at speeds far greater than the other ES planes

    Q: Will the VR Training zone be coming back?

    A: No VR training right now.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Speedy Cerviche
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2783


Reply #1404 on: March 25, 2012, 12:35:31 PM

solid Q&A.

Still have seen very little about the economy & resource system, very curious about it.
Malakili
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10596


Reply #1405 on: March 25, 2012, 12:40:53 PM

Quote
  Q: Will there be HATS?

    A: Yep, we have hats.

Looks like people are finally learning from Valve\

Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1406 on: March 29, 2012, 10:22:41 AM


Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Malakili
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10596


Reply #1407 on: March 29, 2012, 10:37:06 AM

About what what I was expecting to be honest.  Looks good enough at this point.
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23626


Reply #1408 on: March 29, 2012, 10:47:45 AM

That looks pretty good.
shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #1409 on: March 29, 2012, 11:45:04 AM

I agree that it looks great.  It will all come down to how the different load-outs limit you, but I guess you can change those when you die as long as you have earned enough exp to have a few trees open to you.  Going too deep into one class tree early on could really suck.  That said, it probably makes the most sense to someone who plans to get serious early.   Meaning me.   awesome, for real

NC MAX here I come.

I have never played WoW.
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12003

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1410 on: March 29, 2012, 11:57:44 AM

Pretty... sure. Still not drinking this kool-aid. I'm waiting to see interiors.  Ohhhhh, I see.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
Malakili
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10596


Reply #1411 on: March 29, 2012, 12:49:03 PM

That looks pretty good.


It depends on how the strategic stuff plays out, which we don't really have any feel for based on that video.  If it is just a decent shooter in a big world, then I'll just play a session based shooter which will probably have tighter, better gameplay.  If they manage to pull off everything in that video without neutering the strategic side, then I'm in.
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1412 on: March 29, 2012, 03:42:37 PM

Kinda funny the dichotomy between PS2 and Heroes and Generals.  The latter harps on its solid strat meta and the former on its pew pew abilities.  The development has been completely reversed between the two.  One gets the core strat/resource stuff in place and then worries about the units later, the other does the opposite.

My guess is there's something innately broken about PS2's system and/or they just can't decide how they want to make it work.

"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
Speedy Cerviche
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2783


Reply #1413 on: March 29, 2012, 04:51:44 PM

I just hope there's SOME meat on the strategic side... the lack of info is worrying though.
Malakili
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10596


Reply #1414 on: March 29, 2012, 04:54:16 PM

If after PS2 comes out I feel compelled to resubscribe to WW2O *again* I'm going to cry.
shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #1415 on: March 30, 2012, 07:10:45 AM

One of things that is not clear from the PS2 videos at this point is if the shortened TTK in infantry vs infantry combat has been extended to other areas.  If infantry TTK is only 1 second, how fast does an anti-infantry MAX mow down infantry?  What is the TTK on taking down a MAX if one is optimally specced for that?  Same with anti-ground/anti-air and armor v armor.

If a Vanguard is killed by 2 hits from another MBT, then combat is going to be spam and spawn over and over.  One could die very quickly in PS1 but that almost always happened from having the enemy focus fire on you.

I have never played WoW.
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1416 on: March 30, 2012, 07:30:58 AM

combat is going to be spam and spawn over and over.

Well, they are "borrowing" heavily from the BF series. 

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Speedy Cerviche
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2783


Reply #1417 on: March 30, 2012, 10:29:23 AM

Well exactly how many torso shots should a medium equip suit be able to take from an assault rifle? 2? 3? 4?

01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12003

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1418 on: March 30, 2012, 10:37:42 AM

There is a point of diminishing returns when it comes to realism and video games.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #1419 on: March 30, 2012, 10:47:13 AM

I am not questioning the absolute time or number of shots it should take.  I don't pretend to know that.  I am just wondering about the difference between specialized and general TTK.

Is the MAX AA loadout the same as the MBT AA loadout as far as Reaver TTK?  Does the anti-vehicle Reaver loadout kill a MBT faster than a MAX AV loadout?  I haven't seen anything in the previews that lays out these basic relationships.  If TTK overall is fast to begin with, are specializations going to be about getting an extra .25 seconds?

I have never played WoW.
Speedy Cerviche
Terracotta Army
Posts: 2783


Reply #1420 on: March 30, 2012, 10:52:20 AM

One would think combat vehicles overall would have to be significantly tougher than footsoldiers, in order to justify the extra resource expenses assuming (hoping) resources are actually meaningful.
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23626


Reply #1421 on: March 30, 2012, 12:43:29 PM

That looks pretty good.
It depends on how the strategic stuff plays out, which we don't really have any feel for based on that video.  If it is just a decent shooter in a big world, then I'll just play a session based shooter which will probably have tighter, better gameplay.  If they manage to pull off everything in that video without neutering the strategic side, then I'm in.
At this point in my gaming career I don't care so much about strategic aspect of the game -- I just want to PEW PEW PEW with lots of other people at the same time. I used to get pissed in PS when people weren't playing "to win" and also got pissed that gains made were so easy to erase. Now I'm realistic that even if the designers are able to come up with a cool strategic element to the game the players will find a way to screw things up just like they did in the original PS.
Malakili
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10596


Reply #1422 on: March 30, 2012, 01:45:08 PM


At this point in my gaming career I don't care so much about strategic aspect of the game -- I just want to PEW PEW PEW with lots of other people at the same time. I used to get pissed in PS when people weren't playing "to win" and also got pissed that gains made were so easy to erase. Now I'm realistic that even if the designers are able to come up with a cool strategic element to the game the players will find a way to screw things up just like they did in the original PS.


I can relate to that more or less, I just figure the "lot of people" only matter to me in a strategic setting.  If I want to pewpew I'm actually pretty happy with just Tribes: Ascend, and Counter Strike: GO is just around the corner.  If/when the pewpew is what I care about, I'd just as well have a smaller focused session based game.  The "lots of people" don't add a lot for me in and of themselves.

In other words, if all it is is an MMO Battlefield, I'd probably be just as happy with Battlefield.
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1423 on: March 31, 2012, 06:54:20 AM

I am not questioning the absolute time or number of shots it should take.  I don't pretend to know that.  I am just wondering about the difference between specialized and general TTK.

Is the MAX AA loadout the same as the MBT AA loadout as far as Reaver TTK?  Does the anti-vehicle Reaver loadout kill a MBT faster than a MAX AV loadout?  I haven't seen anything in the previews that lays out these basic relationships.  If TTK overall is fast to begin with, are specializations going to be about getting an extra .25 seconds?

Your worry would play right into resource mechanics with regards to equipment availability.  TTK may be 1 sec. on a max vs. reaver but it matters moreso in the sense there is limited supply on the Max.  If there's an unlimited supply of equipment (and you dont have to wait for availability) then TTK is less relevant.  You'd just die and come right back in.

Lemme simplify though with this question:  will there be attrition in this game at all?

"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12003

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1424 on: March 31, 2012, 09:04:07 AM

As much as I hate the direction this game seems to be heading, I would like to know how much ammo are you able to carry and how to you resupply. I get this dreadful suspicion that I am going to have a magic box thrown on the ground that grows bullets in my inventory.

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
Surlyboi
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10963

eat a bag of dicks


Reply #1425 on: April 01, 2012, 06:08:21 PM

As much as I hate the direction this game seems to be heading, I would like to know how much ammo are you able to carry and how to you resupply. I get this dreadful suspicion that I am going to have a magic box thrown on the ground that grows bullets in my inventory.

I have a feeling you're right.

Tuned in, immediately get to watch cringey Ubisoft talking head offering her deepest sympathies to the families impacted by the Orlando shooting while flanked by a man in a giraffe suit and some sort of "horrifically garish neon costumes through the ages" exhibit or something.  We need to stop this fucking planet right now and sort some shit out. -Kail
01101010
Terracotta Army
Posts: 12003

You call it an accident. I call it justice.


Reply #1426 on: April 02, 2012, 05:51:19 AM

I gotta baaaaaad feeling about this...

Does any one know where the love of God goes...When the waves turn the minutes to hours? -G. Lightfoot
shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #1427 on: April 02, 2012, 07:06:49 AM

I liked the "massive" in PS1 because as an undenied bottom quartile player in FPS games, I want a population large enough where there WILL be someone I can kill.   DRILLING AND MANLINESS

I have never played WoW.
Ghambit
Terracotta Army
Posts: 5576


Reply #1428 on: April 02, 2012, 07:16:34 AM

I liked the "massive" in PS1 because as an undenied bottom quartile player in FPS games, I want a population large enough where there WILL be someone I can kill.   DRILLING AND MANLINESS

Or at least something you can do besides shoot someone.

"See, the beauty of webgames is that I can play them on my phone while I'm plowing your mom."  -Samwise
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1429 on: April 16, 2012, 09:52:20 AM

So, you no longer hack bases anymore.

Awesome.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23626


Reply #1430 on: April 16, 2012, 09:56:04 AM

Head scratch

How do you cap cases now?
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1431 on: April 16, 2012, 10:03:53 AM

I'll give you a guess.


Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Trippy
Administrator
Posts: 23626


Reply #1432 on: April 16, 2012, 10:11:29 AM

Did they give hackers something new to do in PS2 then? Or did they reduce the importance of that cert overall?
Surlyboi
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10963

eat a bag of dicks


Reply #1433 on: April 16, 2012, 10:11:43 AM

Lame

Tuned in, immediately get to watch cringey Ubisoft talking head offering her deepest sympathies to the families impacted by the Orlando shooting while flanked by a man in a giraffe suit and some sort of "horrifically garish neon costumes through the ages" exhibit or something.  We need to stop this fucking planet right now and sort some shit out. -Kail
Mrbloodworth
Terracotta Army
Posts: 15148


Reply #1434 on: April 16, 2012, 10:39:45 AM

Did they give hackers something new to do in PS2 then? Or did they reduce the importance of that cert overall?


AFAIK, they still have doors. That are apparently more secure than Consoles now. Dam the VS and their technical marvels.

Hacking:

No Vehicle jacking.
Not needed for capturing.
Doors are hackable.
Terminals? Not even needed because you spawn with all equipment.
I have no idea what else.... But all cloakers are hackers and all hackers are cloakers now.


What I do not understand, Is it REALLY so hard to cover a guy while he is hacking a base? or is this just another "Battlefield does it" choice.

Because in my mind this is a step backwards.

One is a team who had the forethought and team building to bring the right equipment/skills to complete an objective, with all the pro/cons that comes with it. likely Including, many hours training together to insert that hacker.

The other is a bunch of people playing alone together that happen to be in range of the flag. Boom head shot.

Today's How-To: Scrambling a Thread to the Point of Incoherence in Only One Post with MrBloodworth . - schild
www.mrbloodworthproductions.com  www.amuletsbymerlin.com
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 102 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  The Gaming Graveyard  |  MMOG Discussion  |  Topic: Planetside 2  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC