Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2024, 01:16:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Search:     Advanced search
we're back, baby
*
Home Help Search Login Register
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Sports / Fantasy Sports  |  Topic: F13 Fantasy Football 2014 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14 Go Down Print
Author Topic: F13 Fantasy Football 2014  (Read 81129 times)
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42632

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #210 on: October 06, 2014, 02:43:43 PM

Hey, it works for me. Trade accepted. Neither one has been lighting the world on fire, but I'm more confident in Fitzgerald even with *Unknown QB off the Street* than Colston right now.

shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #211 on: October 06, 2014, 06:12:24 PM

And I am thinking that anyone with Brees is better than an aging Larry F with no name QB!  That is what makes a market.

I have never played WoW.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #212 on: October 06, 2014, 08:17:33 PM

I'm playing against a guy with Percy Harvin and laughing.  How many TD's has he had taken away due to penalties tonight?

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #213 on: October 06, 2014, 08:41:49 PM

I'm playing against a guy with Percy Harvin and laughing.  How many TD's has he had taken away due to penalties tonight?

Guy I'm playing in the other league just needed 6 points from Percy to win. Just six.

He got 4.50,  why so serious?

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19268


Reply #214 on: October 06, 2014, 10:04:39 PM

I'm playing against a guy with Percy Harvin and laughing.  How many TD's has he had taken away due to penalties tonight?

 Heartbreak

When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
Zetleft
Terracotta Army
Posts: 792


Reply #215 on: October 06, 2014, 11:09:50 PM

I'm playing against a guy with Percy Harvin and laughing.  How many TD's has he had taken away due to penalties tonight?

 Heartbreak
He never did get his 4th touchdown... I'm sure that one would have held up :p
shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #216 on: October 07, 2014, 06:59:36 AM

With 5 weeks down, time for a review.

QB: Luck leads the position and was drafted in Round 6 by Roosters. Peyton is 4th and Rodgers is 6th. Rivers at #2 is the big surprise so far, Drunks grabbed him in Round 9!  Many fantasy pros liked Matt Ryan (Round 5) this year. I thought they were nuts. I am wrong so far.

WR: Once again, Roosters proved adept at the draft by grabbing the #1 WR through 5 weeks, Antonio Brown, early in Round 3.  My stretch for Maclin in Round 5 has panned out so far.  The draft grader hated that pick.  Injuries have plagued Megatron and AJ this year. Two Green Bay WRs are in the top 4!  Edelman has not lived up to the early hype due to Brady's problems.  Kelvin Benjamin is less than a point from being in the top 10 as a rookie.  The Panthers picked a good one and so did Attack Monkies (11th round). We have discusses Steve Smith already so I won't go back there.

RB: Ginger Gorillas grabbed DeMarco Murray in Round 2 and he has blown the field away so far (although some of his peers have had a bye week already).  His fragility has not emerged yet and who thought the Cowboys would run so much? Not me.  The bigger story, though, is the stink coming from LeSean and Jamaal. Those early draft pick disappointments have been hard for their owners to overcome. However, both picked RBs in round 2 as well and those picks, Bell and Foster, have produced like 1st rounders.  Two old dogs, Bradshaw (#7) and Fred Jackson (#11) just won't quit the NFL.  Bradshaw saved me a few times and he went undrafted.  Drunks' Round 12 pick of Sproles looked like genius through 3 weeks but the Eagles are having trouble running now.

TE: Jimmy Graham has not lived up to the Round 1 hype.  His 58 points would make him the #8 WR this year so far. Thomas (Round 4) is the #1 TE so far, but he is only 12pts ahead of #10 while the #1 to #10 spread among WRs is almost 30pts.  Drafting TEs in the early rounds is a risky bet that apparently even the fantasy pros fall for every 10 years or so.  The hype on Graham was monstrous this year.  I like that Antonio Gates has seen a revival (#4) after going undrafted.  I was an ass in hindfight for leaving him on the board in favor of Pitta.

DEF: This year is a great example of why you don't waste a mid-round pick on Defense.  Two teams (probably autodrafters) took DEF in Round 7 and the better pick of those two, SF, is #15 so far.  Attack Monkies grabbed HOU in the 8th and has gotten solid top ten TE type points from them.  Nonthing I saw anywhere in the fantasy pro world suggested Philly and Buffalo would be at the top of this list. 

I have never played WoW.
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #217 on: October 07, 2014, 07:16:45 AM

Like the recap. I'm just happy to be 2-3 right now after my WR performances. Ugh.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42632

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #218 on: October 07, 2014, 08:44:16 AM

The WR pool is hellaciously shallow this year. You either get one of the top five or six, or you are sucking hind tit hoping for a TD on one of your guys. Trying to waiver wire a WR is a fruitless endeavor - it's pure luck to get a good one who will likely have 2 weeks at most of breakout numbers and 14 weeks of suck. RB's to me seem to be on a bit of an upsurge but again - if you didn't get the right ones, you are fucked. Even the sure things haven't been.

Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #219 on: October 07, 2014, 09:00:42 AM

Hypothetically speaking, would anyone here choose Ronnie Hillman over Chris Johnson going forward?  I could also potentially drop Trent Richardson, and I'm already dumping Taliaferro for a tight end to cover a bye week.  My ace RB in this league is Chris Ivory and I've got James Starks as my longshot.

I hate my team in this league, and yet I'm 4-1.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42632

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #220 on: October 07, 2014, 09:20:17 AM

If Chris Johnson is someone you are counting on, you're fucked.  why so serious? Taliaferro is a dud - Forsett is getting most of those carries.

WayAbvPar
Moderator
Posts: 19268


Reply #221 on: October 07, 2014, 09:59:03 AM

Yeah, I thought Chris Johnson might do something since his QB is dogshit, but Chris Ivory is stealing his job. He got paid and then immediately got lazy. Chone Figgins-esque.

When speaking of the MMOG industry, the glass may be half full, but it's full of urine. HaemishM

Always wear clean underwear because you never know when a Tory Government is going to fuck you.- Ironwood

Libertarians make fun of everyone because they can't see beyond the event horizons of their own assholes Surlyboi
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42632

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #222 on: October 07, 2014, 10:03:55 AM

To be fair, Chris Johnson was lazy on the Titans last year too, so the Jets shouldn't be in the least bit surprised he's riding a lawn chair this season. Their GM is utter shit.

Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #223 on: October 07, 2014, 10:46:32 AM

Taliaferro put up fantasy numbers two games in a row before he fell off, so considering my situation before that he was a decent pickup.  Anyway, I'm going to cut Johnson loose unless someone convinces me not to in the next 12 hours or so.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #224 on: October 07, 2014, 10:51:38 AM

Hypothetically speaking, would anyone here choose Ronnie Hillman over Chris Johnson going forward?  I could also potentially drop Trent Richardson, and I'm already dumping Taliaferro for a tight end to cover a bye week.  My ace RB in this league is Chris Ivory and I've got James Starks as my longshot.

I don't think Hillman has any long term value in that platoon.  Juwan Thompson looks to be the sleeper pick there.

Is Andre Williams available?  He's worth a flier too.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #225 on: October 07, 2014, 10:57:11 AM

Nah, Williams was drafted.  It's a very deep 14-team league.  The following RBs are available with over 2% ownership rates: Robert Turbin, Danny Woodhead, Ray Rice and Terrance West.  The only other conceivable pickup this week would be Brandon Oliver, but who knows where he stands in two weeks either.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #226 on: October 07, 2014, 11:01:38 AM

Grab Oliver.  He's like a stronger version of Sproles.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Nevermore
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4740


Reply #227 on: October 07, 2014, 11:33:56 AM

Yeah, even when Mathews comes back Oliver is a good bet to take on the Woodhead 3rd down back role.  Woodhead, by the way, is out for the year if I remember correctly.

Over and out.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42632

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #228 on: October 07, 2014, 11:44:14 AM

Yes, Woodhead is hosed. Terrence West is also not going to get you shit.

Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #229 on: October 07, 2014, 01:51:39 PM

So the current order is Oliver for Johnson, and Hillman for Johnson in case someone else wants Oliver more.  Dropping Taliafero for a TE that I can then flip back into some RB the following week, and swapping kickers because I'm fickle like that.
Yegolev
Moderator
Posts: 24440

2/10 WOULD NOT INGEST


WWW
Reply #230 on: October 08, 2014, 08:43:26 AM

My wife told me yesterday YOU BETTER NOT GRAB OLIVER so I figured he was worth a look... but I forgot to go for him. why so serious?

Why am I homeless?  Why do all you motherfuckers need homes is the real question.
They called it The Prayer, its answer was law
Mommy come back 'cause the water's all gone
Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #231 on: October 08, 2014, 10:11:46 AM

Haha, I spread my risk out.  Grabbed Oliver in one league, Hillman in another and Williams in the 3rd.  I will probably regret Hillman the most.
MrHat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7432

Out of the frying pan, into the fire.


Reply #232 on: October 08, 2014, 12:03:41 PM

Haha, I spread my risk out.  Grabbed Oliver in one league, Hillman in another and Williams in the 3rd.  I will probably regret Hillman the most.

Ya. Broncos will probably roll with whoever they feel like between Hillman+CJ+Thomas then when Ball gets back he'll likely only get 50% of the snaps.

Good for the team, bad for fantasy.

Or I could be stunningly wrong.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #233 on: October 08, 2014, 12:37:47 PM

I think Thomas will be their feature back by the end of the season... but still part of a 3 headed platoon.  None of them will ever be fantasy gold.  Just a flex spot option in a deep league.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #234 on: October 09, 2014, 07:52:17 AM

New fantasy decision question: Wes Welker or Steve Smith Sr. for my flex spot?  I also have Cordarralle Patterson, but have lost all faith in the Minnesota offense. 

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #235 on: October 09, 2014, 07:56:49 AM

I'm looking to trade for a good TE starter if people are interested in a WR. Welker, Benjamin, and Sanu are on the table. Julio Jones is possibly on the table for a top 5 TE option.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
Cyrrex
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10603


Reply #236 on: October 09, 2014, 08:01:11 AM

I assume that is main league, in which case I am a sad panda because I have Delanie Walker that I am not using.  I think he must be close to top five, but I haven't checked.

"...maybe if you cleaned the piss out of the sunny d bottles under your desks and returned em, you could upgrade you vid cards, fucken lusers.." - Grunk
Paelos
Contributor
Posts: 27075

Error 404: Title not found.


Reply #237 on: October 09, 2014, 08:22:14 AM

Yeah in the main league.

CPA, CFO, Sports Fan, Game when I have the time
MrHat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7432

Out of the frying pan, into the fire.


Reply #238 on: October 09, 2014, 08:35:29 AM

I assume that is main league, in which case I am a sad panda because I have Delanie Walker that I am not using.  I think he must be close to top five, but I haven't checked.

He is in that Awesome Value TD Tier 2, just below the Ultra Reliable Tier 1 of Julius/Gronk/Graham.

I think TEs look like this Rest of Season (in order PPR):

Tier 1 (no brainer starts, you drafted them high for reliability)
Julius
Gronk
Graham

Tier 2 (each has a very high floor and can post no.1 TE numbers each week based on TD)
Olsen
Martellus
Delanie

Tier 3 (mini Gronk pick up)
Kelce

Tier 4 (who the eff knows if they catch a TD, but its very likely)
Gates
Cameron (Q)
Reed (Q)
Vernon (Q)
Donnell
Allen
Ertz

Tier 5 (high floor crew 3-4 catches 30-50 yards)
Heath
Witten
Daniels
Cook

Tier 6 (upside specials)
Wright
Green
Paul
Toilolo
Ebron
Sefarian-Jenkins

Basically, T1-5 is every week starter (T1-2 are so great they are legit flex plays over most RBs/WRs depending on the league). Kelce I think is super great and has a chance to be the fourth TE drafted off the board next year.  T4 will win you a match up but its flukey.  T5 won't lose you a match up.  T6 is stash and hope for second half of season performance (Wright or SJ) or injuries to WRs/TEs on the team (Green, Paul, Toilolo, Ebron can all become 3rd down/TD targets if the main RBs/WRs/TEs go down).

Been spending a lot of time looking at TEs these last few weeks since Rudolph went down.  He was my TE in basically all my leagues.  In my money league ($2k pot), I've got amazing players everywhere but TE, so I've been trying to figure out proper trade value for each of those guys.  Currently I'm trying to trade Ball straight up for Kelce, as their values are intersecting about now (bye week).


Edit: Forgot Ertz, added to T4 due to PHI implosion.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2014, 08:39:33 AM by MrHat »
Phildo
Contributor
Posts: 5872


Reply #239 on: October 09, 2014, 08:36:09 AM

Wes Welker or Steve Smith Sr.

That's a good problem to have, both have great matchups this week.  I'm currently rolling smith over Sanders in one league, but I'm waffling over it heavily.

I actually dropped Patterson for Smith since some dummy let him go last week.
HaemishM
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 42632

the Confederate flag underneath the stone in my class ring


WWW
Reply #240 on: October 09, 2014, 08:38:00 AM

You forgot Zach Ertz in your TE pool. He's actually been giving me steady numbers each week.

MrHat
Terracotta Army
Posts: 7432

Out of the frying pan, into the fire.


Reply #241 on: October 09, 2014, 08:38:27 AM

Wes Welker or Steve Smith Sr.

That's a good problem to have, both have great matchups this week.  I'm currently rolling smith over Sanders in one league, but I'm waffling over it heavily.

I actually dropped Patterson for Smith since some dummy let him go last week.

I want to say be careful with Smith as no matter what he is old and it's a lot of running around to do for the whole season.  But:
shiznitz
Terracotta Army
Posts: 4268

the plural of mangina


Reply #242 on: October 09, 2014, 09:32:07 AM

New fantasy decision question: Wes Welker or Steve Smith Sr. for my flex spot?  I also have Cordarralle Patterson, but have lost all faith in the Minnesota offense. 

While both match-ups are good, Welker just has too much competition for looks. Flacco always looks for Smith first these days.  Smith has 49 looks to Welker's 18.  I just don't see any reason to expect that differential to reverse.

I have never played WoW.
Nebu
Terracotta Army
Posts: 17613


Reply #243 on: October 09, 2014, 10:34:01 AM

While both match-ups are good, Welker just has too much competition for looks. Flacco always looks for Smith first these days.  Smith has 49 looks to Welker's 18.  I just don't see any reason to expect that differential to reverse.

While I agree with your fundamental premise, remember that Welker has played 2 games and Smith has played 5.  I'm only considering Welker for 2 reasons.  1) the Jets are weak in the middle against the pass and 2) Welker needs the ball to stay productive.  Manning learned this last year.  I'm guessing that it's pretty likely that Welker may see more red zone balls this week.  I'm just not sure I want to bet on it.

"Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other."

-  Mark Twain
Cyrrex
Terracotta Army
Posts: 10603


Reply #244 on: October 09, 2014, 10:38:21 AM

Yeah, and Sanders is emerging to be the real deal and no reason to think Peyton will stop throwing to him.  He even tore up the Seattle secondary.  Naturally, I sat him that week.

Also, in JV league, I have both Delanie Walker and Gronk.  Will consider trades, but I will be blunt here:  I would only trade either of them for a top level RB, and more likely it would be for Walker.  I also have an abundance of WRs still...I think Malcolm Floyd and Mike Wallace are more or less permanent bench warmers, at least until Percy Harvin sprains his vag.

"...maybe if you cleaned the piss out of the sunny d bottles under your desks and returned em, you could upgrade you vid cards, fucken lusers.." - Grunk
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14 Go Up Print 
f13.net  |  f13.net General Forums  |  General Discussion  |  Sports / Fantasy Sports  |  Topic: F13 Fantasy Football 2014  
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC